alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 289 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 289

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that gun violence 
 is a public health issue and Congress should enact by the end of the 
  114th Congress comprehensive Federal legislation that protects the 
  Second Amendment and keeps communities safe and healthy, including 
 expanding enforceable background checks for all commercial gun sales, 
improving the mental health system in the United States, and making gun 
           trafficking and straw purchasing a Federal crime.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2015

 Mr. Lowenthal (for himself, Mr. Thompson of California, Ms. Esty, and 
 Mrs. Capps) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
  the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that gun violence 
 is a public health issue and Congress should enact by the end of the 
  114th Congress comprehensive Federal legislation that protects the 
  Second Amendment and keeps communities safe and healthy, including 
 expanding enforceable background checks for all commercial gun sales, 
improving the mental health system in the United States, and making gun 
           trafficking and straw purchasing a Federal crime.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) gun violence is a public health issue; and
            (2) Congress should enact by the end of the 114th Congress 
        comprehensive Federal legislation that protects the Second 
        Amendment and keeps communities safe and healthy, including 
        expanding enforceable background checks for all commercial gun 
        sales, improving the mental health system in the United States, 
        and making gun trafficking and straw purchasing a Federal 
        crime.
                                 <all>
```
#### JACOB CARATTINI *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 19872)

Hennessy, Pellegrino and Daly, Js.

Submitted on briefs June 12

officially released July 11, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
Forbearance
Agreement


 


This
forbearance agreement, created on July 27, 2018 is entered into by and between SharedLABS, Inc., (Borrower), and Kishore Khandavalli
(Lender).


 


WHEREAS,
the Borrower has previously entered into a loan agreement with the Lender, with a principal amount of two million eight hundred
and fifty thousand dollars, and an annual interest rate of 6.0%.


 


WHEREAS,
the Borrower has failed to adhere to the agreed schedule for repaying said loan, and as a result without forbearance would be
considered to have defaulted on the loan agreement’s terms,


 


WHEREAS,
the Lender has agreed not to demand immediate payment of the total loan balance in accordance with the existing loan agreement,
and has instead opted to grant the Borrower an extended opportunity to bring the loan’s balance current,


 


THEREFORE,
The Borrower and Lender agree to the following terms of this forbearance agreement:


 


1.
Forbearance


 


The
Lender has agreed to extend the due date of the past due amount on the associated loan agreement until (the earlier of) either
(i) additional equity or debt capital can be secured to make payments, or (ii) September 30, 2018, at which time all payments
and interest currently due under the terms of the agreement, will be due. The Lender agrees to refrain from taking any action
designed to demand or collect the loan’s balance prior to September 30, 2018.


 


Notwithstanding
the foregoing, in the event that payment is not made on or by September 30, 2018, but Borrower has received a bonafide term sheet
for financing or equity to come into the company, which it has provided to Lender and is in form reasonably acceptable to Lender,
Lender will extend his forbearance by a period of not more than 30 days in order to allow payment to be made by or on behalf of
Borrower to Lender.


 


3.
Absence of Waiver


 


This
forbearance agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any right or term contained in the original loan agreement documents or
the Contribution Agreement. The Lender shall continue to enjoy the full legal protections and benefits outlined in the original
loan agreement, the promissory note with respect to the loan, all other agreements, documents, and instruments with respect to
the loan,


 


4.
Authority


 


The
parties signing this forbearance agreement hereby warrant that they are authorized to enter into agreements on behalf of the parties
involved in the associated loan agreement, including without limitation this forbearance agreement.


 


5.
Acceptance


 


By
signing below, the Lender and Borrower agree to the terms of this forbearance agreement as an addendum to the existing loan agreement.


 


	BORROWER	 	LENDER
	 	 	 
	/s/
    Jason M. Cory	 	/s/
    Kishore Khandavalli
	Jason
    M. Cory, CEO	 	Kishore
    Khandavalli
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 229 (Thursday, November 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 83564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26277]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4724-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Hawaii; Amendment No. 7 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-4724-DR), dated August 10, 2023, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 13, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective September 30, 2023.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-26277 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 31.aI, John P. Manning, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund LimitedPartnership;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: July 16, 2007 /s/ John P. Manning   John P. Manning   Principal Executive Officer
19306

#### State v. Esau

Affirmed
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 84367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26754]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9 a.m., December 13, 2023.

PLACE: Members of the public wishing to attend the meeting must submit 
a written request at least 24 hours prior to the meeting to receive 
dial-in information. All requests must be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89daeceafbecfde8fbf0fde6fde1eccbe6e8fbedc9fbfbeba7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90c3f5f3e2f5e4f1e2e9e4ffe4f8f5d2fff1e2f4d0e2e2f2bef7ffe6">[email protected]</span></a>.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Office of Legislative Affairs Update.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stephanie Hillyard, Secretary to 
the Board, (312) 751-4920

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b)

    Dated: December 1, 2023.
Stephanie Hillyard,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-26754 Filed 12-1-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Mildred Kless, Defendant.

City Court of the City of Buffalo, Erie County,

March 16, 1959.

*Carman F. Ball, District Attorney (Robert T. Rosinski*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*Thomas M. Dean*for defendant.

*8Joseph P. Kuszyhski, J.

Questions have been raised on interpretation of section 2147 of the Penal Law, which makes it a misdemeanor to offer and sell meat on a Sunday.

The prosecution and the defense are in accord as to the facts; the police officer, on a Sunday afternoon at approximately 1:00 p.m. at a self-service market, serviced himself by selecting a frozen piece of steak; he then approached the exit where at the check-out station was the defendant whose function was to collect payment as the customers left with their purchases; and it is alleged that the defendant, Mildred Kless, in accepting payment, sold the frozen piece of steak.

The defense contends that frozen meats are exempt from the prohibitions of this section since it defines meats as “ fresh or salted ’ ’ and is silent on the point of ‘1 frozen ’ ’. To this view I do not hold. The language differentiates between cooked and uncooked meats, placing the accent on uncooked meats. Freezing is a process which keeps meats in a fresh state for indefinite periods; hence, frozen meats are uncooked fresh meats and within the prohibitions of section 2147 of the Penal Law.

The issue was also raised as to whether the defendant, an employee only, is the proper defendant; the argument being advanced that the owners should be charged with the violation. There is no bar to a corporation or partnership being charged with this misdemeanor. The defendant has no interest in the establishment. She has no voice in the policies of the market, as to what items of merchandise are to be carried, offered and sold to the public. To sell one must have title. Defendant derives no profit from the sale directly. She performs the menial task of receiving money for purchases from the business itself. Thus, this is no proof that the defendant herein intended to sell or offered for sale the prohibited meat, within the meaning of the statute, on a Sunday.

Then, too, I feel that in view of section 2149 of the Penal Law, which section orders a confiscation of exposed meats after a conviction for violation of section 2147, the proper defendant should be the owner or owners of said business for I fail to see how the court may order a confiscation of goods of one who is not a party to these proceedings. This confiscation statute refers to conviction of one having title. The defendant, as an employee, does not own the goods which were so exposed.

The motion of the defendant’s attorney that the defendant is not the proper party to be charged with offering for sale and selling the meats on Sunday is granted. The defendant is discharged.
184 P.3d 838

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### Jou v. Schmidt

27369

05/14/2008

Denied

117 Hawai'i 477, 184 P.3d 792
#### Elaine Green,* Petitioner, *v.*William Brown,* Respondent.

Family Court, Westchester County,

December 9, 1970.

*John J. 8. Mead, County Attorney*(F. *Sherwood Alexander*of counsel), for petitioner. *Arnold D. Roseman*for respondent.

*

 Names are fictitious for purpose of publication.

Anthony J. Cerrato, J.

In this proceeding, instituted pursuant to article 5 of the Family 'Court Act, petitioner seeks an order adjudging the respondent to be the father of a child born to her on January 29, 1967. In answer to the petition, the respondent entered a general denial and requested that a blood grouping test be performed.

By notice of motion dated October 8, 1970, the respondent moves this court for an order permitting him to take the deposition upon oral questions of the petitioner.

The taking of oral depositions is not specifically authorized by the Family Court Act. The Family Court Act does, however, provide that where the method of procedure is not prescribed, the provisions of the CPLR shall be applicable to the extent that they are appropriate (Family Ct. Act, § 165).

It is well settled in this jurisdiction that the Family Court has the authority and power to order a pretrial examination of a party *(Matter of Hirsch*v. *Hirsch,*53 Misc 2d 938; *Matter of Schwartz*v. *Schwartz,*23 A D 2d 204). There is however, no absolute right to have a pretrial examination in a Family Court proceeding. Despite the general liberality intended by *227CPLR 3101 and 3102 as to disclosure, a rule of caution continues with respect to the grant of disclosure in matrimonial actions and in analogous proceedings in the Family Court *(Matter of Rann*v. *Rann,*54 Misc 2d 704; *Nomako*v. *Ashton,*20 A D 2d 331). Furthermore, in *Matter of Doe*v. *Roe*(40 Misc 2d 148) the court held that the same restrictions which have heen applied to matrimonial actions should he applied to filiation proceedings, and an examination before trial should be denied in the absence of a showing of special circumstances.

In the instant proceeding, the respondent has met the burden of showing special circumstances and. is entitled to the relief requested. The petitioner commenced this proceeding some 20 months after the birth of her baby. In addition, although a demand for a bill of particulars was duly served, said bill was furnished some 20 months thereafter. It is now some four years after the alleged acts of sexual intercourse. Quite obviously, if the respondent is to adequately prepare and defend this action, he must know something more than the fact that the petitioner-has asked that he be declared the father of her child.

Accordingly, the instant motion is granted. The petitioner shall -submit to a disclosure within 30 days from the entry of an order to be submitted hereon.
CAUSE NO. 2014 – CI 19385 

LEVY TOWNHOUSE OWNERS, INC )( IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

 )(

 )( 408TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

VS )(

 )( BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS 

KATHLEEN BARRACO )(

NOTICE OF APPEAL

 This Notice of Appeal is filed by Kathleen Barraco, Respondent, a party to this 

proceeding who seeks to alter the trial court's judgment or other appealable order. 

 1. The trial court, cause number, and style of this case are as shown in the 

caption above. 

 2. Kathleen Barraco desires to appeal from the default judgment granted and 

entered on May 1, 2015. Defendant appeals the granting of said judgment as service was 

defective in the cause, whereby the court lacked jurisdiction. 

 3. Defendants Motion for New Trial was filed on June 1, 2015, and denied 

by operation of law on July 15, 2015. 

 4. This appeal is being taken to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, 

Bexar County Texas..

5. The deadline for filing the Notice of Appeal is August 15, 2015.

 Respectfully submitted 

 _/sBernard Buecker Bar no 03314500 

FILED

8/4/2015 2:15:18 PM

Donna Kay McKinney

Bexar County District Clerk

Accepted By: Consuelo Gomez

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/4/2015 2:36:24 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
2 

 310 S St Mary’s, # 1220 

 San Antonio, Texas 78205 

 Tel. 210 226 1788 Fax. 858 9307 

 Attorney for Anna Maria Cancino 

 mastholte@aol.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I certify that a true copy of this Notice of Appeal was served in accordance with 

rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on each party or that party's lead 

counsel as follows: 

Party: LEVY TOWNHOUSE OWNERS, INC 

Lead attorney: M. Susan Rice 

Address of service: 39340 IH 10 West, Suite D, Boerne, Texas 78006 

Method of service: srice@msricelaw.com & fax no. 1 888 840 1597 

Date of service: August 3, 2015. 

 A copy of this notice is being filed with the appellate clerk in accordance with 

rule 25.1(e) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

_/s Bernard Buecker 3 August 2015 

Bernard "Ben" Buecker 

Attorney for Respondent, Kathleen Barraco
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Coconut Rhinoceros Beetle

Last Modified: 

Print

The coconut rhinoceros beetle (CRB) attacks and damages coconut palms. It bores

into the tops of trees and feeds on the sap which can significantly reduce coconut

production and kill the trees. In addition, the CRB also feeds on economically

important crops, such as bananas, sugarcane, papayas, sisal, pineapples, taro, and

date palms. This pest is native to Southeast Asia and has spread throughout Asia

and the Western Pacific.
In 2013, CRB was found in a pest survey trap in Honolulu, Hawaii. We work with the

Hawaii Department of Agriculture, the University of Hawaii at Manoa and other

partners to survey, trap and manage CRB.

What To Look For

You can protect coconut palms from this damaging pest. Here's what to look for:

Appearance

Adult beetles are a brownish-black color and have a distinctive horn

projecting from their heads. They are big, shiny and stout, measuring

about 2 inches long and 3 quarters of an inch to almost an inch wide.

Larvae

Also called grubs, the larvae are usually a yellowish-white color. They can

be quite long, reaching almost 4 inches or more. They feed and develop in

dead, standing coconut trees and fallen coconut logs, or other types of

decaying organic mulch.

Holes

Adult CRBs create holes in palm frond stems. Typically, the holes span the

width of at least two fingers. You may also see coconut fibers around the

areas.

V-shaped damage

The V-shape could be right side up or upside down, resulting from CRBs

boring through developing leaves on palms trees. Younger palms are more

vulnerable than mature ones.

If you live in Hawaii and you see the beetle or beetle damage, report it immediately.

Visit CRBHawaii.org to see photos of the pest and the damage it causes and to learn

about its lifecycle.

How To Prevent This Pest

If you live in Hawaii, take these steps:
Allow authorized agricultural specialists access to your property to look for

CRBs, inspect mulch piles and hang traps. The traps, equipped with pheromone

lures and solar powered UV/LED lights, are scentless and harmless to humans

and pets. Survey specialists service traps every one to two weeks.

Invasive pests can hitchhike in international cargo and passenger baggage.

When you return from international travel, declare all agricultural items.

Fresh fruits, vegetables or plants shouldn't be brought or mailed to Hawaii

unless agricultural inspectors have cleared them beforehand.

How It Is Treated

Contact Coconut Rhinoceros Beetle Response if you suspect your palm tree is

infested or want to know more about what is being done in your area.

Report Plant Pests and Diseases

If you're in Hawaii, contact the Hawaii Department of Agriculture’s Pest Hotline by

calling or texting 808-643-PEST (7378) or emailing info@crbhawaii.org. If you're in

the continental United States, contact the plant health director in your State.

Find your State plant health director

Reports and Assessments

View All Final Environmental Documents