alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Estate of J. Frank Vieillard, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

February 11, 1959.

*Harry Pfeffer*for Howard Beales, petitioner.

*Shapiro Driscoll $ Gottschalk (John Giles*of counsel), for Elsie J. Vieillard and another.

John D. Bennett, S.

This is a proceeding pursuant to section 137 of the Surrogate’s Court Act which was commenced by an order to show cause directing the respondents, Elsie J. Vieillard and Zachary S. Zimmerman, to attend and be examined as to an alleged will executed by the decedent prior to the instrument offered for probate in another proceeding in which Elsie J. Vieillard, the widow of the decedent, is the petitioner. Upon *704the return date of the order to show cause, an alleged will dated February 5,1957 was produced and filed with the court. Certain red lines had been made in ink through the signature of J. Frank Vieillard, the decedent. One of the respondents, Mr. Zimmerman, was sworn and examined in this proceeding by the petitioner. Upon objection of the respondent, the examination was thereupon terminated pending a decision by this court as to the scope of an examination under section 137 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. Section 137 reads in part as follows: “ Whenever it shall appear by petition of any person claiming to be interested in the estate of a decedent, including a creditor, that there is reasonable ground to believe that any person has destroyed, retained, concealed, or is conspiring with others to destroy, retain or conceal a will or testamentary instrument of a decedent, or has any knowledge as to such facts, the court must make an order requiring the respondent to attend and be examined in the premises, and may in such order or otherwise in the proceeding require the production of any will or testamentary instrument.”

The leading case setting forth the practice and procedure under section 137 is *Matter of Johnson (Be Owen)*(253 App. Div. 698, 700) where the court said: *“*In such a proceeding the examination is not to discover evidence that may be used in any other proceeding beyond the fact that such a will is or was in existence. It does not contemplate that there shall be evidence taken concerning the mental or physical condition of the decedent at the time of making any such will, nor the circumstances of its execution, nor its provisions. The purpose is to discover whether any such paper purporting to be a will was drafted and executed or purported to be executed, without going into the question of validity * * * The purpose of the statute is salutary in that it offers opportunity to interested persons to discover the existence of a will which may represent the plan and purpose of the testator better than the one offered for probate.” (See, also, *Matter of*Yung, 216 App. Div. 595; *Matter of Connor,*131 Misc. 576; 2 Bradford Butler, New York Surrogate Law and Practice, § 906; 2 Jessup Redfield, Surrogates Law and Practice, § 970.)

The questions to which objections have been made relate to matters other than the existence of other wills. The authorities require that such objections be sustained.

Proceed accordingly.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



              Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-45019) pertaining to the RSI Holdings, Inc. Incentive Stock
Award Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-45021) pertaining
to the RSI Holdings, Inc. Stock Option Plan of our report dated October 9,
1996, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of RSI Holdings,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended August 31,
1996.






Greenville, South Carolina
October 18, 1996
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

NO. 09-0745

FREEDOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC., D/B/A THE BROWNSVILLE HERALD AND VALLEY MORNING STAR, PETITIONER

v.

JUAN ANTONIO CORONADO, ET AL., RESPONDENT

ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR REVIEW

**ORDER**

	1.	Pursuant to the notice of bankruptcy filed with this Court on September 4, 2009, this case is **ABATED.**TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2.

	2.	This case is removed from the Court's active docket until and shall be treated as closed, subject to reinstatement upon proper motion.  *See* TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3.  All motions and other documents pending or filed are abated subject to being reurged in the event the case is reinstated.  TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2 and 8.3.  It is the parties’ responsibility to immediately notify this Court once the automatic bankruptcy stay is lifted.

	Done at the City of Austin, this 8th day of September, 2009.

BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

By Jessica Hamby, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 85290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Office of 
Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, 
CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--RFA-OH-23-003, Panel B, 
Occupational Safety and Health Education and Research Centers (ERC).
    Dates: February 28-29, 2024.
    Times: 11 a.m.-5 p.m., EST.
    Place: Video-Assisted Meeting.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Michael Goldcamp, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, Office of Extramural Programs, National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 
26505. Telephone: (304) 285-5951; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e737951525a5d5f534e7e5d5a5d10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c9848ea6a5adaaa8a4b989aaadaae7aea6bf">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023-26843 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________ Nos. 99-2906 & 99-2907

________________ In re: Marion F. Pruss, also known as Law Offices of Marion F. Pruss,

Debtor. Marion F. Pruss,

Appellee,
v. Richard J. Butler and Kathleen Laughlin,

Appellants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit. [PUBLISHED]

________________ Submitted: May 11, 2000 Filed: October 10, 2000

________________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

________________ PER CURIAM.2

The court is informed that the underlying bankruptcy case has been dismissed by order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska, thereby making both of these appeals moot. Accordingly, It Is Ordered: 1. Inappeal number 99-2906 brought by the Chapter 7 Trustee, Mr. Butler, the appeal is dismissed as moot. 2. Inappeal number 99-2907 brought by the Chapter 13 Trustee, Ms. Laughlin, the appeal is dismissed as moot, and it is remanded to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel with directions that the panel vacate its opinion and judgment filed June 8, 1999. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Kaimi v. Broderick

17848

10/24/96

Affirmed
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 127 

Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, the contributions of these 

brave men and women who protect public safety, and expressing support 

for the designation of March 31, 2015, as National Lineman Appreciation 

Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2015 

Mr. MULVANEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, the contributions of these brave men and women who protect public 

safety, and expressing support for the designation of 

March 31, 2015, as National Lineman Appreciation Day. 

Whereas the profession of linemen is steeped in personal, 

family, and professional tradition; 

Whereas linemen are often first responders during storms 

and other catastrophic events, working to make the scene 

safe for other public safety heroes; 

Whereas linemen must work high atop powerlines 24 hours 

a day, 365 days a year, to keep electricity flowing; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 127 IH 

Whereas linemen play a vital role in the Nation’s economy by 

maintaining and growing the energy infrastructure of the 

United States; 

Whereas linemen must often work under dangerous conditions separated from their families to keep schools and 

businesses open; 

Whereas linemen put their lives on the line every day with 

little recognition from the community regarding the danger of their work; and 

Whereas March 31, 2015, would be an appropriate date to 

designate as National Lineman Appreciation Day: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the efforts of linemen in keeping 

3 the power on and protecting public safety; and 

4 (2) supports the designation of National Line5 man Appreciation Day. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
November 4, 2003

23896

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Standard
Management Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Paul B.
("Pete") Pheffer, President and Chief Financial Officer of Standard Management
Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1)      such Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of Standard Management Corporation.


                                    -------------------------------------------
March 6, 2003                       /s/ Paul B. ("Pete") Pheffer
                                    -----------------------------
                                    Paul B. ("Pete") Pheffer
                                    President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Cooke v. Marzec

25274

04/27/2004

Affirmed
#### Jou v. Medical Ins. Exchange of California

24450

05/30/2003

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply496Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  David Linn (no... (not verified)PermalinkJuly 27, 2018 - 10:53amInteresting to learn about things we may not notice but are important.  Thank you, Erin!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2144

JOSEPH R. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED; FIRST NORTH

AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 00-2145

JOSEPH R. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CIRCUIT CITY STORES; CIRCUIT CITY STORES,

INCORPORATED; FIRST NORTH AMERICAN NATIONAL

BANK,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

No. 00-2146

JOSEPH R. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED; FIRST NORTH

AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-98-1407-A, CA-99-695-A, CA-99-696-A)

Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 23, 2001

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph R. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Earle Duncan Getchell, Jr.,

MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Joseph R. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders denying

his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motions and his motion to vacate the judgment and remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Johnson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., Nos. CA-98-

1407-A; CA-99-695-A; CA-99-696-A (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 1, 2000,

entered Aug. 7, 2000; filed Aug. 3, 2000, entered Aug. 7, 2000;

filed Aug. 15, 2000, entered Aug. 19, 2000). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
July 24, 1998

20759

#### Johnson v. State

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

BSE Ongoing Monthly Surveillance

Program

Last Modified: 

Print

Public and animal health are protected from BSE by a stringent feed ban imposed by

the Food and Drug Administration in 1997 and by the removal of all specified risk

material which could harbor BSE. USDA also has a strong ongoing surveillance

program in place to detect signs of BSE in cattle in the United States. The program

samples approximately 25,000 animals each year and targets cattle populations

where the disease is most likely to be found. The targeted population for ongoing

surveillance focuses on cattle exhibiting signs of central nervous disorders or any

other signs that may be associated with BSE, including cattle that cannot walk, are

low-weight, injured, or dead. These types of cattle are sampled at farms, veterinary

diagnostic laboratories, public health laboratories, slaughter facilities, veterinary

clinics, and livestock markets.
Current Monthly Test Results

APHIS reports ongoing surveillance test totals monthly.

Collection Month FY2024

Number of 

Valid Samples OIE Points

October 2023 1,561 19,082

November 2023 2,324 21,047

December 2023 2,333 16,429

January 2024 2,958 21,370
Collection Month FY2024

Number of 

Valid Samples OIE Points

February 2024 3,023 25,325

March 2024 2,115 10,039

Total as of April 1, 2024 14,314 113,291

Beginning in Fiscal Year 2016, the BSE ongoing surveillance program will sample

approximately 25,000 animals each year. Under the program, USDA will continue to

collect samples from a variety of sites and from the cattle populations where the

disease is most likely to be detected.

Fiscal Year 2007-2016 Test Results

For Fiscal Years 2007-2015, the BSE ongoing surveillance program had a target of

testing approximately 40,000 animals per year.

OIE Surveillance Points: design prevalence of 1 case per 100,000 U.S. adult cattle

and 95% confidence; 300,000 OIE points over 7 years, or 42,857 OIE points on

average per year are required.

BSurvE Surveillance Points: design prevalence of 1 case per 1,000,000 U.S. adult

cattle and 95% confidence; 3,000,000 points over 7 years, or 428,571 BSurvE points

on average per year are required.

Samples Tested, OIE Points, and BSurvE Points by

Fiscal Year

Loading...

BSE Ongoing Surveillance Program Cumulative Totals

Valid Tests from September 1, 2006 to April 1, 2024: 575,700

OIE Points from September 1, 2006 to April 1, 2024 : 12,410,407

BSurvE Points from September 1, 2006 to April 1, 2024 : 29,606,054
(see "BSE Ongoing Surveillance Plan (187.01 KB)" for information on OIE and BSurvE

points)
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Senator J. Robert Kerrey Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Liberty Elm

Year
    1999

Location
      
Capitol Square, N.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text on the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Commemorative Tree

*Ulmus americana 'liberty'*
(Liberty Elm)

Planted by
No Greater Love & Sen. John McCain

To Honor Senator J. Robert Kerrey
Medal of Honor Recipient
U.S. Navy Seal

April 23, 1999
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    The Senator Kerrey tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.

The Senator Kerrey tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
    The Senator Kerrey tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.

The Senator Kerrey tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
    The Senator Kerrey tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

The Senator Kerrey tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

      Previous Image
        Next Image

          The Senator Kerrey tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
      The Senator Kerrey tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
      The Senator Kerrey tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of Leon Schinasi, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

May 19, 1959.

*Corbin, Bennett <& Delehanty*for Ruby Schinasi and others, as trustees, petitioners.

*Samuel A. Spiegel,*as special guardian for Gina R. Schinasi and others, infants, respondent.

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

The testator by paragraph Sixteenth of his will gave to his trustees permissive power to make investments beyond the scope of investments for trustees as authorized by law when the will was made. As it was the intent of the testator to enlarge rather than limit the investment powers of his trustees, the court finds that the grant to the trustees of power to make certain investments is no restriction upon the trustees’ power to make other investments consistent with section 21 of the Personal Property Law. *(Matter of Hilliard,*197 Misc. 1094; *Matter of Marquand,*203 Misc. 284; *City Bank Farmers Trust Co.*v. *Evans,*255 App. Div. 135; *Matter of Hamersley,*152 Misc. 903.) The court also finds that when the testator stated that his trustees might invest “in high grade bonds or other obligations * * * issued by the United States government or political subdivision thereof ” the meaning and effect of such words was to permit the trustees to invest in bonds, issued by any State, city and local government or political subdivision thereof. The proposed construction sought by the trustee is therefore adopted by this court.

Submit decree construing the will accordingly.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

National Wildlife Research Center

Research Areas

Last Modified: 

Print

Research Area Project Location

Agricultural Food Security and Safety Fort Collins, CO

Aquaculture Starkville, MS

Avian and Invasive Species Populations Gainesville, FL

Aviation Safety Sandusky, OH

Bird Damage Fargo, ND

Economics Fort Collins, CO

Feral Swine and Other Ungulates Fort Collins, CO

Forest and Wetland Resources Fort Collins, CO

Invasive Species on Islands Hilo, HI, Guam

Invasive Species on Islands: Brown Treesnakes Guam

Population Management/Reproductive Control Fort Collins, CO

Predator Management Logan, UT

Rabies Fort Collins, CO

Repellents Fort Collins, CO

Rodents Fort Collins, CO

Wildlife Disease Fort Collins, CO

Wildlife Genetics Fort Collins, CO

Support Area Unit Location
Animal Care Fort Collins, CO

Human Dimensions Fort Collins, CO

Information Services Fort Collins, CO

Laboratory Support Services Fort Collins, CO

Regulatory Support Services: Technology Transfer Fort Collins, CO

Regulatory Support Services: Product Registration Fort Collins, CO
#### Tokashiki v. Freitas

26635

04/11/2006

Vacated & remanded