alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd. at June 30, 1998, and its statement of income
for the six months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd. for the six months ended June 30,
1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,973,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  236,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                   120,958
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      22,281,166
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,620,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,206,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,079,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,206,624
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,917,221
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  279,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                84,667
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,575,026
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,575,026
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,575,026
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XII, ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN
THE REGISTRANTS FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       8,816,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,160,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,565,834
<PP&E>                                       5,920,898
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,528,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,152,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,708,611
<BONDS>                                      4,803,342
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,216,800
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,422,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,152,058
<SALES>                                      2,117,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,117,938
<CGS>                                          174,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,231,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             595,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (23,377,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (23,377,611)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (23,377,611)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)


</TABLE>
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Licensing Rule: Veterinary Care for

Dogs

Last Modified: 

Print

This page provides a general overview of the veterinary care requirements for dogs

covered under the changes to the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) that was published in

the Federal Register on May 13, 2020. The rule takes effect on November 9, 2020.

These changes aim to promote compliance, reduce licensing administrative burdens,

and strengthen safeguards to ensure humane care for animals covered under the

AWA.

Summary of Changes to Veterinary Care

Standards for Dogs

Section §3.13 of the new AWA regulations requires facilities to work with their

attending veterinarian to develop a written Program of Veterinary Care for dogs. 

Under the new regulation, the program must include a scheduled visit by the

attending veterinarian not less than once every 12 months, and all dogs on the

premises must receive an annual physical exam to ensure their health and
wellbeing.

A facility’s Program of Veterinary Care also needs to include vaccinations for

contagious and deadly diseases, as well as sampling and treatment for parasites and

other pests.  Facilities must also have preventative care plans in place to ensure

their dogs have healthy and unmatted coats, properly trimmed nails, and clean and

healthy eyes, ears, skin, and teeth.

In addition, facilities must maintain all medical records for their dogs and make them

available during inspections.  Medical records need to include identification, records

of routine husbandry, a description of any health-related issues, and records of

vaccinations and other tests.

Related Links

Animal Care - Program of Veterinary Care (APHIS Form 7002)

Animal Care - Program of Veterinary Care for Dogs (APHIS Form 7002a)

Licensing Rule

Licensing Rule: Watering Standards

Contact Us

If you have questions, please contact our office:

Animal Care Program

Email: animalcare@usda.gov

Phone: 970-494-7478

Fax: 970-494-7461

Mailing Address:

2150 Centre Ave.
Bldg. B, Mailstop 3W11

Fort Collins, CO 80526
Mexico-US cooperation

Duncan Wood

ITAM & Mexico Institute WWICS

http://www.issuu.com/ecspwwc/docs/usmexico_cooperation_in_renewable_energies
Wind

•Oaxaca •Baja Cal. •Tamaulipas •Private 

supply

•Export

Solar

•High 

insolation

•High cost •Lack of 

government 

support

•Long term 

export 

potential

Biofuels

•Ethanol •Jatropha •Biodiesel •Methane 

capture

•NADBank
 MREP of the 1990s and 2000s

 Geothermal cooperation

 Oaxaca wind projects

 La Rumorosa wind development for export

 NADBank projects 
Economic benefits

•Direct creation of 

temporary and permanent 

jobs

•Indirect creation of 

temporary and permanent

jobs – services sectors.

•Local and state government

energy savings through

self-supply projects–

benefits passed on to tax

payer

•Electricity subsidies for

local inhabitants.

•Electricity supply to off grid

communities

•Infrastructure investment 

(roads, water, etc)

Knowledge spillover and 

development of human 

capital

•Knowledge and 

information networks that

permeate through multiple

social spheres

•Specialization in institutes

of higher education.

•Creation of research and 

training centers.

•Increased interaction

between government, 

business and civil society.

Social participation

•Communication between

government, business and 

local populations.

•Make sure local community 

becomes stakeholder

•Acceptance of projects as 

driver of local development

•Lessons from Oaxaca
6 jobs per 

MW of 

turbine 

production

100-450 

jobs/yr/TWh

installed

For every job created in 

manufacturing installation

and operation of wind

energy, at least one more 

created in research, 

financing, consulting

services.

The importance of clusters

Texas example: 10,000 jobs 

from wind
Baja 

California

•Geothermal •Wind •Solar •Biogas

Sonora

•Solar •Biogas

Chihuahua

•Wind (W. 

Chihuahua)

•Solar •Biogas

Coahuila

•Biogas

Nuevo Leon

•Biogas –

45% of 

public 

lighting in 

Monterrey

Tamaulipas

•Wind •Biogas
WIND SOLAR

La Rumorosa – potential of between 

1.8GW (US DOE/NREL) -2.4 GW 

(RETI).

6 kWh/day/m2
•Public lighting in Mexicali (80%)

•Reduced tax bill

•50% subsidy on electricity bill

• Human capital spillover

La Rumorosa

1

•Wind for export – to California (RPS)

•$500/month for ranchers

Future 

development: 

•Financing

•Subsidies

•Infrastructure

•Regulation

•Social dimensions – how to ensure private sector fair play?

Obstacles:
Mexico’s Northeast

Tamaulipas:

•Wind energy 

potential

•No outlet to U.S.

•Private sector 

demand

•Need for state 

government 

support
27422

#### State v. Crawford

Affirmed
12 P.3d 882

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

October 9, 2000

22968

#### State v. Brown

Affirmed
#### Camp v. Camp.

26452

02/17/2006

Denied

109 Hawai'i 469, 128 P.3d 351
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 25, 2016

NO. 03

- 14

- 00555

- CR

John Charles Terry, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES ROSE, PE MBERTON, AND BOURLAN D

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court

. Appellant

John Charles Terry h as filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the Court grants the

motion, allows appellant to withdraw his notice of appeal, and dismisses the appeal. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

###### Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities

# AGENCY:

National Endowment for the Humanities.

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal for Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act and its implementing regulations, the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities (the Council) gives notice that the Charter for the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel advisory committee was renewed for an additional two-year period on November 17, 2023. The Council determined that renewing the advisory committee is in the public interest in connection with the duties imposed on the Council by the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Act, as amended.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elizabeth Voyatzis, Committee Management Officer, 400 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20506. Telephone: (202) 606-8322, facsimile (202) 606-8600, or email at                         *gencounsel@neh.gov.*                         Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter may be obtained by contacting the National Endowment for the Humanities' TDD terminal at (202) 606-8282.                    

Dated: November 28, 2023.

Jessica Graves,

Paralegal Specialist, National Endowment for the Humanities.

[FR Doc. 2023-26446 Filed 11-30-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
October 14, 2004

25926

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82345-82346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25970]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 10661-000]


Indiana Michigan Power Company; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

    The license for the Constantine Hydroelectric Project No. 10661 was 
issued for a period ending September 30, 2023.
    Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the 
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the 
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other 
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived 
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b) 
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth 
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an 
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to 
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the 
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project 
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be 
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b),

[[Page 82346]]

to continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else 
a license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the 
project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 10661 is issued to 
Indiana Michigan Power Company for a period effective October 1, 2023, 
through September 30, 2024, or until the issuance of a new license for 
the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. 
If issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place 
on or before September 30, 2024, notice is hereby given that, pursuant 
to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA 
is renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Indiana Michigan Power Company is authorized to 
continue operation of the Constantine Hydroelectric Project under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until the issuance of a 
subsequent license for the project or other disposition under the FPA, 
whichever comes first.

    Dated: November 17, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-25970 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Kappas et al., Appellants, *v.*Wilzbach, Appellee.

(No. 31669

Decided February 23, 1949.)

*Mr. Louis C. Capelle,*for appellants. '

*Mr. Henry M. Bruestle,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Maurice W. Jacobs,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Habt, Zimmerman, Turner and Taet, JJ., concur.

Stewart, J., not participating.
#### State v. Tai

24766

05/09/2003

Affirmed
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, the undersigned officer of ARI Network Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that:

         (1)      the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
                  ended October 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  December 16, 2002


                                       /s/ Brian E. Dearing
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Brian E. Dearing
                                       Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and President
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) ("W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand down an opinion but 1

is not required to do so."); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).

NUMBER 13-08-118-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

IN RE: DONALD WAYNE THIELEMAN

_______________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

_______________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1

Relator, Donald Wayne Thieleman, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the

above cause on January 18, 2008. However, the party filing a petition for a writ of

mandamus bears the burden of providing the court with a sufficient record to establish the

petitioner's right to mandamus relief. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7. The rules that govern our

review of relator's petition require, for example, that the petition be accompanied by a

certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator's claim for relief and

that was filed in any underlying proceeding. See id. at rule 52.7(a)(1); see also id. at rule
2

52.3(j) (required contents of appendix to petition include certified or sworn copy of "any

order complained of"). Relator has not submitted an appendix or any other material

constituting a record to support his petition. He, therefore, cannot demonstrate that the

trial court has abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,

is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See id. at rule 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 25th day of March, 2008.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 539 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 539

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 1, 2015.
    Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 8) to modernize energy infrastructure, build a 21st century energy 
and manufacturing workforce, bolster America's energy security and diplomacy, 
and promote energy efficiency and government accountability, and for other 
purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy 
and Commerce. After general debate, the Committee of the Whole shall rise 
without motion. No further consideration of the bill shall be in order except 
pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider 
in the House any joint resolution specified in section 3 of this resolution. All 
points of order against consideration of each such joint resolution are waived. 
Each such joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions in each such joint resolution are waived. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on each such joint resolution and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one motion to commit.
    Sec. 3.  The joint resolutions referred to in section 2 of this resolution 
are as follows:
     (a) The joint resolution (S.J. Res. 23) providing for congressional 
disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of a rule submitted 
by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ``Standards of Performance 
for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary 
Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units''.
    (b) The joint resolution (S.J. Res. 24) providing for congressional 
disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of a rule submitted 
by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ``Carbon Pollution Emission 
Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                           15,954
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                    24,002
<ALLOWANCES>                      1,583
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 46,373
<PP&E>                          151,697
<DEPRECIATION>                   31,464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  793,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            54,121
<BONDS>                         350,000
<COMMON>                            270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                     193,539
<OTHER-SE>                      126,318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    793,272
<SALES>                         105,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                106,898
<CGS>                            27,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   123,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               23,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (26,776)
<INCOME-TAX>                     (5,532)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (21,244)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                    (21,714)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (1.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0
        



</TABLE>