alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

How To Import Plants and Plant

Products into the United States 

Last Modified: 

Print

Import requirements vary depending on the specific commodity and country of

origin. You can find this information in our ACIR database.

Agricultural Commodity Import Requirements

(ACIR)

START HERE if you are new to the process or do not know the

type of import permit you need.

Go to ACIR

The ACIR database contains import requirements (including Federal import orders)

for the following agricultural commodities:

Cut flowers and greenery

Fresh fruit and vegetables
Pest organisms

Processed fruit and vegetables

Plants and seeds for planting and propagation

Seeds not for planting

Soil, soil amendments, and rocks

Wood products and byproducts

Can't find your agricultural commodity in ACIR? Please contact us.

Import Permits

START HERE if you already know the specific permit you need.

Log in to eFile

APHIS eFile is the online system to apply for and receive import and transit permits

for plants, plant pests, soil, and agricultural products.

First time user? Create an account.

Things To Know When Importing Plants and Plant

Products

Commodity Import Approval Process 

If the plant, or plant product you want to import is not already an approved

commodity or undergoing a pest risk analysis, you must initiate a commodity import

request.

Controlled Import Permits 

Some plants and plants products are restricted, which means you need to follow

additional requirements to import them into the United States.

Packaging Materials Risks and Best Practices 
Learn more about wood packaging materials, the risks they can pose to the United

States, and how APHIS regulates them.

Lacey Act Declaration 

The Lacey Act combats the illegal trafficking of wildlife, fish, and plants. Find out if

your commodity needs a declaration.

Phytosanitary Treatments for Imported Commodities 

Some imported commodities may need a phytosanitary treatment before they enter

the United States to make sure they are free of pests and diseases.

Have a question about importing plants or plant products?

Visit Our Trade Contacts Directory
Exhibit 4.3


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated July 12, 2018, with respect to the financial statement of Smart Trust 387 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-224601) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 12, 2018
February 22, 2002

22376

#### State v. Hubert

Affirmed
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION* IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND 

 * 

 * Misc. Docket AG, No. 79 

Petitioner * 

 * September Term, 2013 

v. * 

 * IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR

ANTHONY MAURICE HARMON * 

 * PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY

 * 

 Respondent * CASE NO. CAE 13-37835 

 

*********************************************

ORDER

 Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein and 

pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 24th day of July, 2014, 

 ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that Anthony Maurice Harmon, be, and 

he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and 

it is further

 ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Anthony Maurice 

Harmon from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection 

Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance 

with Maryland Rule 16-772(d). 

 /s/ Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. 

 Senior Judge
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Mary B. Criss, Defendant.

County Court, Westchester County,

February 14, 1957.

*Allan V. Everard*for defendant..

*194
      *Joseph F. Gagliardi, District Attorney (Warren J. Schneider*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Harold T. Garrity, J.

Defendant moves for an order directing a Police Justice to file his return in the appeal herein.

There apparently has been an inadvertent error in citing the particular subdivision of the Vehicle and Traffic Law of which defendant was convicted in defendant’s affidavit submitted in connection with her appeal, as well as in defendant’s instant order to show cause.

The conviction and sentence are obviously predicated on subdivision 5 of section 70 of the said statute and not subdivision 2 thereof. This is confirmed by the affidavit submitted in opposition.

We reluctantly conclude that the Police Justice is somewhat disingenuous in urging that the inadvertent error results in there being ‘ *‘*no conviction of said defendant before this court, ’ ’ therefore rendering it *‘ ‘*impossible for your deponent to file a Return herein.”

Defendant has been convicted of a serious crime and grave punishment has been imposed. Our criminal law, in either its substantative or adjective aspects, was never intended to bar a defendant from a review of his conviction by an appellate court.

The venerable maxim that a litigant is entitled to his *“*day in court ” is not limited to a trial court. It necessarily encompasses an opportunity to be made available to a defendant, if he is so-minded, to urge before an appellate court that he has, in fact or in law, been deprived of his day in court by virtue of an unlawful or erroneous determination by a lower court.

It ill-behooves those responsible for the prosecution or adjudication of criminal proceedings to invoke picayune technical objections to bar appellate review. Short of a clear showing that "the People have been prejudiced, no appellate court should refuse to entertain jurisdiction where there have been genuine and reasonable efforts to perfect such appeal. The same criteria should be and are almost universally applied by prosecutors and lower courts.

Defendant’s motion is granted. The Police Justice is directed to file his return within 10 days after service of a copy of the order with notice of entry.

Submit order.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF R

. A

. A

., T

. J

. A

. AND S

. M. A

., CHILD REN

,

Appellant

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 21 3

- C V

Appeal from the

65 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 201 8 DCM 5057 )

O R D E R

In order to protect the identity of the minor children who are the subject of this appeal, the

Court has determined on its own motion that it is necessary to identify the children by their initials,

R. A. A., T. J. A. and S. M. A.

, and the parent by initials as well, in all papers submitted to the

Court, including letters, motions, and briefs. See Tex.R.App.P. 9..8. The Court will also refer to

the children and parent by their initials in correspondence, orders, and in its opinion and judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21 st d ay of August

, 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000879555
<NAME> BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND III LP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             124,093,743
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               124,093,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,246
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,669,692)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,540,446)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1 Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 3:35 PM

To: 'Hill, Jonathan'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Info rmation - Building 10, LLC

Dear Mr. Jonathan Hill:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 0107). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by

Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and

not consider closed

‐ set filming in your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention before

the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to

333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information

described above by 4/28/15.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3602-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (FEMA-3602-EM), dated October 8, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on October 8, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Teresa Y. Serata, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

This action terminates the appointment of Benigno B. Ruiz as Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

                        The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance                               ( print page 83563)                            (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.                    

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-26270 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
# • 11/01/93 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 89 Revision to the PetroLeum**Refini~g** Primary and Secondary OiL/Water/SoLidsSeparation SLudge Listings (F037 and F038) 56 FR 21955-21960 May 13, 1991 (RCRA CLuster I, HSWA Rule)
Note: This checkList amends the Listings of F037 and F038 which.weremade at·55 FR 46354 (November 2, 1990; Revision CheckList 81). This ruLerevises and narrows these listings by 1) excLuding non-contact, once-through cooLing water fromF037 and F038 Listings and 2) not including, within the scope of the F038· listing, floats generated in or after aggressive biologicaL treatment units. States wishing to adopt this optional changeare stronglyencouraged to adopt this changeat the same time the Revision Checklist 81provisions are adopted.

FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION STATE ANALOG IS: MORE EQUIV- STRINALENT. GENT BROADER IN· SCOPE PART 261 • IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS·WASTE WAC 173-303
SUBPART D - LISTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTES


### t HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES revise description of F037 andF038 261.31(a) 9904 

## x 

# •

•
May 13, 1991 - Page 1 of 1
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

NAHLN-Related Publications

Last Modified: 

Print

Browse NAHLN-related publications, including our newsletter, disease response

guidance, and more.

Newsletter and Other Publications

Updated Title Topic

March 2024 Newsletter: The NAHLN Update* General

2020

Year 3 Report: NAHLN Antimicrobial Resistance

Pilot Project

Antimicrobial

resistance

2019

Year 2 Report: NAHLN Antimicrobial Resistance

Pilot Project

Antimicrobial

resistance
Updated Title Topic

2018

Year 1 Report: NAHLN Antimicrobial Resistance

Pilot Project

Antimicrobial

resistance

October

2018

Update on NAHLN Activities** General

* For past newsletters, visit About NAHLN.

** Also available in Microsoft Powerpoint format upon request

See More See Less

Assay Performance Characteristics

Vesicular Stomatitis Virus rRT-PCR—Equines 

Veterinary Services Disease Response

Foreign Animal Disease Preparedness and Response (FAD PReP) is the United States'

comprehensive preparedness and response strategy for FAD threats. Below are key

FAD PReP documents. To view all FAD PReP documents and resources, visit Foreign

Animal Disease Preparedness and Response.

Updated Title Topic

December

2020

VS Guidance 12001.4: Policy for the Investigation of

Potential Foreign Animal Disease/Emerging Disease

Incidents

Policy

October

2015

APHIS Foreign Animal Disease Framework: Response

Strategies

FAD PReP

Manual

2022

APHIS Foreign Animal Disease (FAD) Investigation Manual

(16.71 MB)

FAD PReP

Manual

Guiding Documents

NAHLN Strategic Plan 2022—2025 

Concept Paper: A Proposal for a Revised Structure of the NAHLN 
(PDF, 121.26 KB)

October 2012

History

Updated Title Topic

2022 20 Years: 2020–2022 NAHLN Report

2013 NAHLN Overview (Founding Principles)* Presentation

2010 10-Year Anniversary: NAHLN Report

2005 Growing the NAHLN (54.35 KB) AAVLD/NAHLN White Paper**

2002 NAHLN (271.99 KB) AAVLD/NAHLN White Paper***

* Also available in Microsoft Powerpoint format upon request

** Progress and plans, need for full implementation/increased funding

*** Background, benefits, risk, what's needed

See More See Less

Scenario Testing Reports

Summary and Analysis of the NAHLN HPAI Exercise Program 

Related Links

NAHLN Laboratories

NAHLN Surveillance and Preparedness

About NAHLN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             554,077
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      346,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                        43,188
<INVENTORY>                                        237,757
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,403,531
<PP&E>                                           3,433,117
<DEPRECIATION>                                     836,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,901,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,485,628
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,461,461
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             8,620
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,946,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,901,918
<SALES>                                          1,650,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,650,955
<CGS>                                              471,956
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,222,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   888,981
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    43,188
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,858,683)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,858,683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,858,683)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.61)




</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-10628

DONN DEVERAL MARTIN,

Petitioner–Appellant

v.

WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent–Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CV-447

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donn Deveral Martin, Texas prisoner # 1454022, seeks a certificate of 

appealability (“COA”) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 application for federal habeas corpus relief. The district court dismissed 

Martin’s petition for habeas relief on procedural grounds. The district court 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 12-10628 Document: 00512599117 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
No. 12-10628

adopted the magistrate judge’s conclusion that because Martin’s convictions 

became final on August 11, 2009, Martin’s “petition, deemed filed on June 23, 

2011, is untimely” under the one-year statute of limitations prescribed in 28 

U.S.C. § 2244(d). The district court did not decide or consider the merits of 

Martin’s constitutional claims.

We then denied Martin’s motion for a COA, noting that Martin had not 

shown “that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court 

was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000).

The Supreme Court vacated judgment on December 6, 2013, and 

remanded this case for reconsideration in light of its opinion in McQuiggin v. 

Perkins, 133 S. Ct. 1924 (2013). There, the Supreme Court held, “actual 

innocence, if proved, serves as a gateway through which a petitioner may pass 

[if] the impediment is . . . expiration of the statute of limitations.” Id. at 1928.

In light of Perkins, this Court finds “that jurists of reason would find it 

debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484. Moreover, because the district court understandably

focused on the statute-of-limitations issue, we do not have an adequate record 

on the merits to determine whether Martin’s actual-innocence claim was 

meritless. See Houser v. Dretke, 395 F.3d 560, 562 (5th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, 

we GRANT the COA and REMAND this case for reconsideration of Martin’s 

actual-innocence claim in light of Perkins. As to Martin’s other claims, we 

DENY Martin’s COA. We express no opinion on the ultimate disposition of 

Martin’s § 2254 petition.

2

 Case: 12-10628 Document: 00512599117 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 313 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 313

Expressing support for designation of May 23rd as ``National Rosie the 
                             Riveter Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2015

    Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself, Ms. Speier, Mr. Huffman, and Mr. 
 DeSaulnier) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for designation of May 23rd as ``National Rosie the 
                             Riveter Day''.

Whereas National Rosie the Riveter Day is a collective national effort to raise 
        awareness of the 16 million women working during World War II;
Whereas Americans have chosen to honor female workers who contributed on the 
        home front during World War II;
Whereas these women left their homes to work or volunteer full-time in 
        factories, farms, shipyards, airplane factories, banks, and other 
        institutions in support of the military overseas;
Whereas these women worked with the USO and Red Cross, drove trucks, riveted 
        airplane parts, collected critical materials, rolled bandages, and 
        served on rationing boards;
Whereas it is fitting and proper to recognize and preserve the history and 
        legacy of working women, including volunteer women, during World War II 
        to promote cooperation and fellowship among such women and their 
        descendants;
Whereas these women and their descendants wish to further the advancement of 
        patriotic ideas, excellence in the workplace, and loyalty to the United 
        States of America; and
Whereas May 23rd would be an appropriate date to designate as ``National Rosie 
        the Riveter Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``National Rosie the 
        Riveter Day''; and
            (2) acknowledges the important role played by women in 
        World War II.
                                 <all>
```