alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q AT
DECEMBER  31,  1996  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      256,054
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                             6,332,883
<ALLOWANCES>                                310,000
<INVENTORY>                               9,661,344
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         18,701,838
<PP&E>                                    2,090,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           65,543,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    18,025,134
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     13,917
<OTHER-SE>                               26,336,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             65,543,314
<SALES>                                  12,938,733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         12,938,733
<CGS>                                     5,824,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             5,824,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        1,375,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,530,533)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (475,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,055,533)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          (1,006,894)
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                             (2,062,427)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.15)
        


</TABLE>
May 24, 2006

27014

#### Hunt v. State

Affirmed
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 446 

Expressing support for designation of October 2 as ‘‘National Manufacturing 

Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself and Mrs. MILLER of Michigan) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of October 2 as ‘‘National 

Manufacturing Day’’. 

Whereas United States manufacturers provide 17,600,000 

jobs in the United States; 

Whereas manufacturing accounted for 12 percent of Gross 

Domestic Product in 2014; 

Whereas including pay and benefits, the annual mean earnings of a United States manufacturing worker is 

$77,506, almost $15,000 higher than the average wage 

of all other industries; 

Whereas manufacturing continues to be the backbone of the 

United States Economy, contributing 

$2,090,000,000,000 to the economy in 2014; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 446 IH 

Whereas manufacturers continue to transform the marketplace, performing more than 75 percent of non-government research and development, accounting for more innovation than any other sector; 

Whereas United States manufacturing workers’ productivity 

exceeds that of any other manufacturing economy; and 

Whereas in the past five 5 years, United States manufacturing has added over 700,000 jobs, marking the fastest 

pace of job growth since the 1990s: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the critical role manufacturing 

3 plays in the United States economy creating good 

4 paying jobs that help support working families; and 

5 (2) supports the designation of ‘‘National Man6 ufacturing Day’’, which honors the hardworking men 

7 and women of the United States manufacturing sec8 tor. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 23, 2009 

p1116 

Order 

 

November 23, 2009 

139249-50 

PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139249-50 

 COA: 283000; 283395 

Macomb CC: 2006-004495-NI 

ROZAFA TRANSPORT, INC. and 

GJERGI RROGOMI, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

GWENDOLYN NEILL, Personal Representative 

of the Estate of WILLIAM J. NEILL, Deceased, 

Intervening Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 9, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
DENIED and Opinion Filed July 27, 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 23 - 00727 - CV IN RE EBBY WADE , Relator Original Proceeding from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 073026 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Breedlove

Opinion by Justice Breedlove Before the Court is relator’s July 25, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus. Relator asks this Court to compel the trial court to rule on several pro se motions relator has filed in the trial court as well as any future motions he files. Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in numerous respects. S ee T EX . R. A PP . P . 52.1, 52.3(a)

– (c), (d)(1)

– (3), (f)

– (h), (j), (k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1). Among other defects, the petition is not certified,
see T EX . R. A PP . P . 52.3(j), and the petition is not supported by a sufficient record or appendix, see T EX . R. A PP . P . 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1). Thus, relator’s petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for– 2

–

consideration of mandamus relief. See In re Jones , No. 05

- 23

- 00492

- CV, No. 05

- 23

- 00493

- CV, 2023 WL 4101440, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas June 21, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); see also In re Salinas , No. 05

- 23

- 00544

- CV, No. 05

- 23

- 00545

- CV, 2023 WL 4101439, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas June 21, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of ma ndamus.

230727f.p05 /Maricela Breedlove/ MARICELA BREEDLOVE JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2  Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)  I, Jonathan N.
Rubin, as Chief Financial Officer of Magellan Health Services, Inc (the Company),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:  (1)the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K
of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.  /s/ JONATHAN N. RUBINJonathan N. RubinDate: February 26,
  2010
  Chief Financial Officer  1
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32(B)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard C.
Christopher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Richard C. Christopher
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard C. Christopher
                                        Vice President, Finance and Chief
                                        Financial Officer
                                        (principal financial officer)
Date: November 9, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       67
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer
of Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2005 of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ S. Patric PlumleyS. Patric PlumleyChief Financial OfficerMay 9, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



23
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 24, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00559

- CR

Stanley Foster BAKER, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 1755

- CR

- A Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On May 17, 2017, after granting a second motion for extension of time to file Appellant’s brief, we ordered appellate counsel, Ch ris Iles to file a brief with this court no later than July 10,

2017.

When no brief had been filed, on July 19, 2017, this court ordered Attorney Iles attorney to either file the appellant’s brief or a motion to dismiss this appeal no lat er than July
29, 2017. If no brief or motion was filed by that date, we warned this appeal would be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2). Attorney Iles was cautioned that, to protect appellant’s rights, th is court may “initiat[e] contempt proceedings against appellant’s counsel.” Id. R. 38.8(b)(4).

Attorney Iles filed a motion to suspend briefing deadlines; we construe this as a motion

for extension of time. The motion is GRANTED and thi s court’s show cause order is satisfied. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed in this court no later than August 18, 2017

. Absent extenuating circumstances, no further extension will be given

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of July, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada Chief Deputy Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### 4000 Old Pali Road Partners v. Lone Star of Kauai, Inc.

15675

11/26/93

Dismissed

862 P.2d 282
Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-75826, 333-01273, 333-03131,
333,18001, 333-76338 and 333-109263) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-58742, 33-76652, 33-94730, 333-24969, 33-94736, 333-40315, 333-48911, 333-40572, 333-104094, 333-104095, 333-115921, and 333-127987) of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., of our report
dated December 14, 2005 relating to the financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading Selected Financial Data in this Form 10K.



|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
|Boston,
Massachusetts     
|December 14, 2005
# EUR-Lex - 12012M054 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M054

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE VI: FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 54 (ex Article 52 TEU) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0044 - 0045 *

Article 54

(ex Article 52 TEU)

1. This Treaty shall be ratified by the High Contracting Parties in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the Government of the Italian Republic.

2. This Treaty shall enter into force on 1 January 1993, provided that all the Instruments of ratification have been deposited, or, failing that, on the first day of the month following the deposit of the Instrument of ratification by the last signatory State to take this step.

--------------------------------------------------
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Organization

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS is made up of 6 programs, 5 management support units, and 1 office that

supports government-wide initiatives. We have more than 8,000 employees

stationed in 50 States, 4 Territories, and 35 countries.

View APHIS Organizational Chart

Operational Program Units

Animal Care 

Determines and promotes standards of humane care and treatment of animals

through inspections and educational efforts.

Learn More
Biotechnology Regulatory Services 

Protects agricultural and natural resources by ensuring safe development of

genetically engineered organisms using a science-based regulatory framework.

Learn More

International Services 
Provides international animal and plant health expertise to safeguard American

agricultural health and promote U.S. agricultural trade.

Learn More

Plant Protection and Quarantine 

Safeguards agriculture and natural resources from risks associated with the entry,

establishment, or spread of pests and noxious weeds.

Learn More
Veterinary Services 

Protects and improves the health, quality, and marketability of our nation's animals,

animal products, and veterinary biologics by preventing, controlling, and/or

eliminating animal diseases, and monitoring, and promoting animal health and

productivity.

Learn More
Wildlife Services 

Provides leadership to resolve wildlife conflicts and create a balance allowing people

and wildlife to peacefully coexist.

Learn More
Management Support Units

Emergency and Regulatory Compliance Services (ERCS) 

Provides leadership on all issues related to emergency preparedness and response,

regulatory investigative and enforcement activities, safety initiatives, and the

regulation of agricultural select agents.

Legislative and Public Affairs 

Manages communications with Congress, States, Tribes, industry stakeholders,

trading partners and the media.

Marketing and Regulatory Business Services 

Provides resource management and administrative services to APHIS and USDA’s

Agricultural Marketing Service.

Policy and Program Development 

Provides rigorous policy analysis and budgetary and regulatory development for

APHIS that is consistent with the Agency's environmental stewardship goals and

legal authorities. Also conducts critical programmatic evaluations and reviews to

ensure programs are operating efficiently and effectively.

Offices

Office of Civil Rights, Diversity, and Inclusion

Our Office of Civil Rights, Diversity, and Inclusion provides leadership, direction, and

technical support to all employees and external service recipients on Civil Rights

matters.

Office of the National Tribal Liaison

Our Office of the National Tribal Liaison serves as a single point of contact for Tribal

issues and works to ensure that relevant programs and policies are efficient, easy to

understand, accessible, and developed in consultation with the Native American
Tribes they impact.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centennial
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended February 28, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officer's knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Michael J. Small
------------------------------------
Michael J. Small
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-16-00718-CV

IN RE Thomas THIBEAUX

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 28, 2016

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On November 1, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Real Party in Interest 

filed a response on December 13, 2016. The court has considered the petition for writ of 

mandamus and response and is of the opinion that Relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014-CI-17823, styled In the Interest of A.T., E.T. and B.T., Children,

pending in the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Renée Yanta presiding.
# Maine_county_differentials_2024
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


July 13, 2018


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 388 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on July 12, 2018, in accordance
with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We consent to
the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration
Statement (No. 333-224599) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the
Units of the Trusts and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                  


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual Report of  Applebee's  International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended  December 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and dates indicated  below,  hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended and (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:    February 28, 2007              By: /s/ David L. Goebel
     ---------------------                 -------------------------------------
                                           David L. Goebel
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual Report of  Applebee's  International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended  December 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and dates indicated  below,  hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended and (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:    February 28, 2007              By: /s/ Steven K. Lumpkin
     ---------------------                 -------------------------------------
                                           Steven K. Lumpkin
                                           Chief Financial Officer
#### Gladys Mills, Respondent, *v.*630 Park Associates et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 11, 1958.

*448
      *Samuel Mezansky*for 630 Park Associates, appellant.

*Sohn £ Okin (Louis Okin*of counsel), for Douglas L. Elliman & Co., Inc., appellant.

*Howard Hilton Spellman*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

It plainly appears from this record that the purchaser obtained by plaintiff repudiated her offer to buy the apartment and indeed plaintiff so testified.

The admission, made during proper cross-examination of plaintiff, as an adverse party, on a crucial issue of the case, was sufficient to nonsuit her.

Despite an agreement between a buyer and a seller upon a sale, a broker cannot recover commission where the customer procured by him *“*recedes from a willingness to buy”. *(Wiesenberger*v. *Mayers,*281 App. Div. 171.)

Under the circumstances, the complaint should have been dismissed on the merits and it follows that there is no support whatever for the judgment in plaintiff’s favor.

The judgment should be reversed, with $15 costs to each defendant, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Concur — Heoht, J. P., Steuer and Tilzee, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.
27553

#### Thomas v. Takabayashi

Affirmed