alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 60 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 444 

[Report No. 114–269] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3495) to amend title XIX 

of the Social Security Act to allow for greater State flexibility with 

respect to excluding providers who are involved in abortions, and waiving 

a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration 

of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 

Ms. FOXX, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3495) to amend 

title XIX of the Social Security Act to allow for greater 

State flexibility with respect to excluding providers who 

are involved in abortions, and waiving a requirement 

of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration 

of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 

Rules. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 3495) to amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 444 RH 

1 allow for greater State flexibility with respect to excluding 

2 providers who are involved in abortions. All points of order 

3 against consideration of the bill are waived. The amend4 ment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules ac5 companying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. 

6 The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 

7 points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, 

8 are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 

9 ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further 

10 amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening 

11 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

12 controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

13 the Committee on Energy and Commerce or their respec14 tive designees; and (2) one motion to recommit with or 

15 without instructions. 

16 SEC. 2. The requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

17 for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Com18 mittee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the 

19 House is waived with respect to any resolution reported 

20 through the legislative day of October 1, 2015. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 60 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 444 

[Report No. 114–269] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3495) 

Rules. tain resolutions reported from the Committee on of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certions, and waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) excluding providers who are involved in aborallow for greater State flexibility with respect to to amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Jun-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                          Jul-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                            Dec-31-1995                     
<CASH>                                          (87)
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   288
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                293    
<PP&E>                                         6392
<DEPRECIATION>                                  314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8641    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           826
<BONDS>                                        5939 
<COMMON>                                       5583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                     704
<OTHER-SE>                                    (4391)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8641
<SALES>                                         459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                459
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1114  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 38
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (925)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (925)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  66
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (859)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.40)
        

</TABLE>
#### Nakamura v. State

21978

09/26/2000

Vacated and Remanded
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Howard D. Siebenrock, Defendant.

Court of Special Sessions, Town of Webster, Monroe County,

December 14,1970.

*John C. Little, Jr., District Attorney (William Servís*of counsel), for plaintiff. *Michael Polozie*for defendant.

C. Benh Forsyth, J.

This matter came on for trial for a violation of subdivision (a) of section 1126 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law — crossing a double yellow line. At the time of the trial the defendant moved to dismiss this case upon the grounds that the verified bill of particulars did not state that it was on information and belief. Such motion is denied.

These proceedings were commenced with a simplified traffic information pursuant to section 147-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The defendant demanded a bill of particulars pursuant to sections 147-f and 147-g. The bill of particulars is for the purpose of giving the defendant reasonable information as to the nature and character of the violation (§ 147-g, subd. 2). This purpose can be accomplished by anyone having knowledge of the offense (whether or not he was an eyewitness) as long as the prosecution has (1) made a sufficient disclosure so the *182defendant may prepare Ms defense, and (2) is limited in its proof to such disclosure; it does not matter who verifies the hill ■of particulars.

The court’s jurisdiction rests on the simplified traffic information and not the bill of particulars *(People*v. *Weeks,*39 Misc 2d 765, revd. on other grounds 13 N Y 2d 944). Therefore the bill of particulars need not meet all the formal requirements of an information *(People*v. *Samsel,*59 Misc 2d 833). Simplified traffic information may be upon information and belief, without so stating *(People*v. *Boback,*23 N Y 2d 189). It would seem inconsistent to then require a higher standard of the bill of particulars than the information. It should also be mentioned that if the Legislature had intended the requirement of personal knowledge of those verifying bills of particulars, they should have said so *(People*v. *Baratta,*56 Misc 2d 447).

The proof satisfied the court that the defendant was guilty, and he therefore is fined $10.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 22
- 00359
- CR

__________________ EX PARTE JOSEPH COLONE

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 10
- 10213

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Joseph Colone appealed from an order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus. On December 19 , 202 3 , Colone filed a m otion to dismiss the appeal
as moot because he has pleaded guilty and the case upon which he had been seeking bail is now dispos ed and a final sentence has been imposed in this case

. The State agrees that the appeal i s moot and should be dismissed. Issues regarding pretrial bail are moot when the accused is no longer subject to pretrial confinement. See Martinez
v. State , 826 S.W.2 d 620, 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); Bennet v. State , 818 S.W.2d 199, 200 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).2 APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM Submitted on January 16 , 2024 Opin ion Delivered January 17, 2024 Do Not Publish Before Horton , Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

National Veterinary Accreditation

Program (NVAP) Error Report Form

Last Modified: 

Print

Submit

Comment 

Please indicate your concern(s):

○ Questions about Content 

○ Problem or Error (Incorrect spelling, text, broken links) 

○ Comments and Suggestions 

Name 

Email 

Questions, Comments, Technical Issues
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Mark R. Tauscher, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that, to his knowledge:

 

(1)               the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 15, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Mark R. Tauscher                  |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Mark R. Tauscher                      |
|                         |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, James G. Thomasch, Principal Financial Officerof the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that, to his knowledge:

 

(1)               the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:    November 15, 2010 | By:    | /s/ James G. Thomasch         |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                                      |   | James G. Thomasch             |
|                                      |   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                                      |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
#### Realty Associates, Ltd., Respondent, *v.*William Bausch, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

May 7, 1959.

*Philip T. Lombardo*for appellant.

*Louis Fine*for respondent.

*Per Curiam,.*

Single-room occupancy in excess of two persons is not forbidden in a building subject to section 248 of the Multiple Dwelling Law, provided that the rooms conform to the requirements of the section. In order to procure an eviction it is incumbent on the landlord to show that they do not *(Shapiro*v. Collins, 6 A D 2d 1038, revg. 12 Misc 2d 71).

The final order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to tenant to abide the event.

Concur — Hoestadter, J. P., Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.
18327

#### Carnett v. Carnett

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q AT
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,931,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,069,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       361,000
<INVENTORY>                                     13,209,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,224,000
<PP&E>                                           3,266,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,936,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,957,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            20,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,489,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,936,000
<SALES>                                         39,058,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,058,000
<CGS>                                           17,861,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,861,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,519,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,508,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,900,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,608,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,608,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .12
                                               


</TABLE>
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Commenting Opportunities: Wildlife

Services

Last Modified: 

Print

Tell us what you think!

Public participation is vital to the decision-making process in Wildlife Services. Your

input helps us make better-informed decisions about actions that may interest or

impact you. We offer opportunities for public comment. You can view and provide
feedback on National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents.

Members of the public are also welcome to join annual meetings of our National

Wildlife Services Advisory Committee.

Latest Commenting Opportunities

6/02/22

USDA Is Notifying the Public That the Secretary of Agriculture Is Soliciting

Nominations for the National Wildlife Services Advisory Committee

Final NEPA Documents

Visit Wildlife Services NEPA Documents to view copies of our final environmental

assessments, environmental impact statements, findings of no significant impact (or

"FONSIs"), and records of decision. For easy reference, the documents are organized

by area of focus (State or national program).

Related Links

APHIS: All Federal Register Posts

APHIS News and Updates

Stay in the Know

For the latest news about Wildlife Services, sign up for email updates.

Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Northern Wilderness
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

EverGreene Painting Studios

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1994

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

A lone explorer in a canoe enters the picture, symbolically from the east.About the Cox Corridors MuralsThe first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The western north-south corridor, called the Westward Expansion corridor, includes maps and scenes showing the growth of the United States from early exploration through the acquisition of Alaska and Hawaii. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Fund's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|Date:             |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|February 14, 2011 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc. N. Teal              
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### State v. Hunn

23718

02/07/2002

Affirmed
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1877
CLAUDIA SAILOR, a/k/a Claudia Sailor Nimocks, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, and FRANK CLEARY, Defendant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-755-BR) Submitted: December 22, 1998 Decided: January 20, 1999 Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Claudia Sailor, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Claudia Sailor filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). When the United States is a party, the unsuccessful litigant is accorded sixty days within which to file in the district court a notice of appeal from thejudgment or final order. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on March 31, 1998; Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on June 2, 1998, which is beyond the sixty-day appeal period. Appellant’s failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leavesthis court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant’s appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We deny Appellant’s motions for appointment of counsel and to delay responding to financial affidavit. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-4 rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, D. Geoffrey Shulman,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                            /s/ D. Geoffrey Shulman
                                            -----------------------
                                            D. Geoffrey Shulman
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                            (Principal Executive Officer), and
                                            Chief Financial Officer (Principal
                                            Financial Officer)

Date: November 13, 2003