alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.22


AMSOUTH BANK





January 30, 2002

Mr. Craig Carra
Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc
147 Keystone Dr.
Montgomeryville, PA 18936-9638

RE:  Covenant waivers to Credit Agreement between Surgical Laser
     Technologies, Inc. and AmSouth Bank dated May 31, 2000

Dear Craig:

AmSouth Bank hereby consents to the following Credit Agreement waivers:

1.)      Waive violation of Section 7.02, which required maintaining an interest
         coverage (as defined in that credit agreement dated May 31, 2000) of
         2.25x. This waiver pertains to the fiscal year ended 12/30/01.

2.)      Waive violation of Section 7.03, which required maintaining a
         Debt/Tangible Net Worth of not more than .50x. This waiver pertains to
         the fiscal year ended 12/30/01.

These aforementioned waivers shall be retroactively effective on 12/30/01.
Should you need additional documentation, please feel free to contact me at
(205) 391-5685.

Sincerely,             RECEIVED AND ACKNOWLEDGED THIS 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2002.



Rhett D. Jordan                         Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc.
Vice President                          By:  /s/ Craig K. Carra
                                          ---------------------
                                        Craig K. Carra
                                        Treasurer


RDJ/ct
January 25, 2006

26070

#### State v. Kealoha

Vacated and Remanded
27308

#### Lutu v. Oahu Transit Services, Inc.

Affirmed
18455

#### Western Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., Matter of Application of

Dismissed
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 10119 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ARNOLDO MENDOZA LEPEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:17

- CR

- 40

- 2

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arnoldo Mendoza Lepez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lepez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Lepez ’s claims of ine ffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 10, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-10119 Document: 00515111188 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2019No. 19

- 10119

2 prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lepez ’s response. We concur with counsel’s

assessme nt that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 19-10119 Document: 00515111188 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/10/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income  Partners  1989-B,  Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         390,534
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  402,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               792,569
<PP&E>                                         8,517,702
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,532,503)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,871,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,407
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,673,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,871,732
<SALES>                                        1,637,588
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,668,209
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  967,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                545,642
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            545,642
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   545,642
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  adiministrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Kenneth D. Walter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ Kenneth D. Walter

Kenneth D. Walter

Chief Financial Officer



March 16, 2005
August 31, 2005

24166

#### Aarona v. GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co., Inc.

Affirmed
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule15d-14(b)**

**Of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of DynTek, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to Rule13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18U.S.C. Section1350, that based on my knowledge:

 

(1)           the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), fullycomplies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: February  17, 2006 | /s/ Robert I.  Webber                  |   |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Robert I. Webber                       |
|                      | President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Revised MATS preamble 

 12/16/2011 08:09 PM 

 

From: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450 

EO12866NESHAPMACT_NSPSforUtilitiesMATS2060_AP52Final20111216a.docx 

Redline 121611a vs. 121611.docx
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 13

- 00210

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF E.B.K.
- R. , a child From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 00852 Honorable H. Paul Canales, Judge Pres iding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Ju stice Delivered and Filed: September 11 , 2013
AFFIRMED This is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating appellant ’s parental rights. Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concluded that the appeal is frivolous and with out merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R. , No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from order terminating parental rights), disp. on merits , 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). Counsel certified that a copy of appellant’s brief was delivered to appellant who was advised of her right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief was filed. After04

- 13

- 00210

- CV reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The order of the trial court is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

PER CURIAM

- 2

-
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.;

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 19, 2004
/s/ John P. Manning   
John P. Manning 
Principal Executive Officer
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Importing Camelids (Camels, Llamas,

Alpacas and Guanacos) into the

United States

Last Modified: 

Print

USDA APHIS regulates the importation of all ruminants and their germplasm

(embryos/oocytes, semen, cloning tissue) to prevent the spread of animal diseases.
Ruminants include all animals which chew the cud, such as cattle, buffaloes, sheep,

goats, deer, antelopes, camels, llamas and giraffes.

View Countries From Which Camelids and Their Germplasm May Be Imported

Farmed camelids may only be imported from the countries listed on this page.

Live Camelids

Australia; a permit and export health certificate are required.

Protocol Farmed Camelids from Australia (306.67 KB) - 2020

Canada

Protocol Domestic Camelids from Canada (335.16 KB) - 2020

What You Need To Know

U.S. transits are classified as shipments presented to a U.S. port of entry for

conveyance purposes to then be transported to a destination country shortly

after. Notice Regarding APHIS Live Animal Import and Third-Country Import

Transit Permits (272.29 KB).

Please note that any animals and their germplasm transiting the United States

must not transit countries with questionable disease statuses prior to reaching

a U.S. port of entry.

All transits require a contingency plan. Please submit your contingency plan

with your permit application (VS 17-129 (106.94 KB)) to laipermits@usda.gov.

To submit an import permit electronically, visit APHIS eFile.

If you are applying to import live animals, semen, and embryos, you may submit

applications by email to laipermits@usda.gov

Contact Us
Live Animal Imports

For questions about import permits or permit applications:

Live Animal Import Permit Team

Email: laipermits@usda.gov

Phone: 301-851-3000

For general questions related to the import of a live animal:

Live Animal Import and Export

Email: laie@usda.gov

Phone: 301-851-3300

All Contacts
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Pat Lane Swanzy, Jr., Appellant

No. 06-12-00157-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the of County, Texas (Tr. Ct. 

No. 2012F00110). Opinion delivered by 

Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and 

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Pat Lane Swanzy, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 29, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### In the Matter of Joseph Gray, Petitioner, against George Maislen et al., Constituting the Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Freeport, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

April 13, 1954.

*Sanford A. Davison*for petitioner.

*Lester H. Baumann*for respondents.

Percy Stoddart, J.

This is a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act in which an order is sought annulling a determination of an “ alleged” Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Freeport.

*162Section 175 of the Village Law provides that the board of trustees of a village may enact zoning ordinances and may appoint a board of appeals to determine or vary the application of such ordinances. Under section 179-b it is provided in part: 1 ‘ Such board of trustees *shall provide for the appointment of a board of appeals consisting of three or five members,*each to be appointed for three years. The board of trustees shall have the power to remove any member of the board for cause and after public hearing. Vacancies shall be filled for the unexpired term of the member whose place has become vacant.” (Italics supplied.) The Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Freeport in section 15 of chapter 10 of the Unified Code of Ordinances provided for a Board of Appeals of five members.

It appears that at the time of the hearing on the petitioner’s application to review a denial of a permit by the Superintendent of Buildings, a vacancy existed on the Board of Appeals. The petitioner requested an adjournment on the ground that there was no Board of Appeals in existence. His request was denied and the hearing proceeded without any further participation in it by him.

Although section 179-b provides that the concurring vote of a majority of the board is sufficient to make a determination, and section 41 of the General Construction Law states that the majority of the “ whole number ” of a board shall constitute a quorum, neither section upholds the respondents’ contention that three members may act when only four members have been appointed. As the statute provides for a five-member board, there must be five appointed even though all need not be present to conduct a meeting.

In view of the foregoing, I consider it unnecessary to pass upon the other questions involved. The determination will be annulled and the matter returned to a lawfully constituted Board of Appeals for another hearing.

Settle order on notice.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T XU E J UN Z HO U, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 72502 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 123- 741 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , N . R . S M IT H , an dC H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. X ue Jun Z hou, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de ni a l of hi s appl i c a t i on f

orc anc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo que s t i ons of l aw and 

# FI LED SEP 26 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 72502 2 c o n s titu tio n a l c la im s , V i lchezv. H

older , 682 F . 3d 1195, 1198 ( 9th C i r . 2012) , and we d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. T h e B IA d idn o t errind ec li n in g to se p ar ately e v alu ate th e h ar d sh ip Z h o u ’s U ni t e d S t a t e s c i t i z e n s on w oul d e xpe r i e nc e i f the s on r e turne d t o C hi naw i th Z hou, w h e r e th e r e w a s in s u f

f ic ie n t e v id e n c e th a t Z h o u ’s s o n w o u lda c c o m p an yh im . See P e r ezv . I

N S , 96 F . 3d 39 0, 39 3 (9th C i r. 19 96 ) ( re qu i ri ng evi dence t o sup po rtan o th e rw is e s p e c u la tiv e h ar d s h ip s c e n ar io ) ; c f. Sa lc ido - Sa lc ido v . I

N S , 138 F . 3d 1 2 9 2 , 1 2 9 3 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 8 ) ( p e rc u r iam ) . Z h o u ’s ar g u m e n t th a t th e B I A f a ile dto co n sid erfin an cial h ar d sh ip is n o t sup p o rted b y th e r ec o rd . It fo ll o w s th at Z h o u ’s du e p r o c e s s c la im f

a ils . Se e L a ta v . I

N S , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e qui r i ng e rr orand s ubs t ant i a l pr e j udi c e f orape t i t i one rt o pr e va i l on adue proces s c l ai m ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Do you own or 

work with poultry?

Let’s keep our poultry 

healthy together.

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
1. Always practice good biosecurity.

 Review the 14 National Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP) 

Biosecurity Principles (www.poultryimprovement.org/documents/

StandardE-Biosecurity Principles.pdf) and create a biosecurity 

plan for your premises. 

2. Remember to wash your hands before and after coming 

into contact with poultry. 

If you don’t have soap and water, use hand sanitizer.

3. Protect yourself. 

Don’t kiss or snuggle with your birds. 

4. Protect your poultry.

 Put control programs in place for wild birds (including their feces and 

their feathers), rodents, and insects. Clean and disinfect any poultry 

equipment before and after use.

5. Monitor your flock’s health.

Know the signs of disease and check your flock daily for any signs

of illness. Quarantine sick birds right away.

6. Report sick birds!

 Call USDA toll-free at 1.866.536.7593 to reach our veterinarians. 

USDA can test your birds free of charge to make sure they don’t 

have a serious poultry disease.

For free resources and to learn more about good biosecurity, 

visit: www.aphis.usda.gov/animalhealth/defendtheflock

Let’s Keep Our Poultry Healthy Together

Program Aid No. 2248 | Issued September 2019

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 

Use these basic tips to keep your birds healthy 

and prevent the spread of serious diseases like 

avian influenza and virulent Newcastle disease.