alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Fw: Revised preamble and regulatory text Anna Wood to: Pam Long 02/23/2012 04:55 PM Cc: Juan Santiago From: Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US To: Pam Long/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA History: This message has been forwarded.


### FYI

_

______________________________ Anna Marie Wood Director, Air Quality Policy Division Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency AQPD (C504-01) 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541- 3604 Fax: (919) 541- 4028 ----- Forwarded by Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/23/2012 04:54 PM ----- From: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine

_J.

_ Kymn@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, MichaelS Brooks/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lynn Hutchinson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kristi Smith/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul Balserak/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/23/2012 04:50 PM Subject: Revised preamble and regulatory text 

### Christine, Per our conversation, please find attached the revisions we have made in response to the interagency comments. All changes have been "tracked" and explained in margin "bubble" comments for ease of review. We are available to discuss any questions the reviewers may have. Please don't hesitate to call if we can be of assistance. Thanks! Juan E. Santiago

Revised Step 3 Draft - OMB comment response 2-23-12.docx

Synthetic Minor Reg Text 2-23-12 Revisions.docx
#### Chinen v. Chinen

16498

11/13/95

Affirmed and Remanded in part
June 18, 2003

25329

#### Ramos v. State

Affirmed
#### Vaughn v. RFD Publications, Inc.

24093

03/20/2003

Affirmed
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                                  May 12, 2000

Intervisual Books, Inc.
FFM Acquisition Corp.
2716 Ocean Park Boulevard, Suite 2020
Santa Monica, California 90405

Re:  Intervisual Books, Inc. ("IBI")
     FFM Acquisition Corp. ("FFM")
     U.S. Bank National Association, as successor in interest to Santa Monica
     Bank ("USB")

Gentlemen:

Reference is hereby made to that certain Loan and Security Agreement, dated May
12, 1999 as subsequently amended, between IBI and FFM (collectively
"Borrowers"), on the one hand, and USB, on the other hand (the "Loan
Agreement"). Whereas the Loan Agreement matured on May 1, 2000, USB has agreed
to extend the maturity of the Loan Agreement to May 1, 2001. The purpose of
this letter is to confirm said extension of maturity until such time as formal
documentation between USB and Borrowers can be executed.

The Loan Agreement, as extended, will be on substantially the same terms and
conditions as currently contained in the Loan Agreement. The financial
covenants, however, will be subject to revision based upon Borrowers' financial
projections.

If you have any questions regarding the foregoing, please do not hesitate to
contact the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By:___________________ Mark Mitchell_________________

Title:____________ Vice President____________________

Acknowledged this 12th day of May, 2000

INTERVISUAL BOOKS, INC.                  FFM ACQUISITION CORP.
a California Corporation                 a California Corporation

By:__Dan P. Reavis________________       By:__ Dan P. Reavis________________
By:__CFO/EVP______________________       By:_________ President_____________
January 29, 1999

21516

#### Whitlock v. Russi

Dismissed
Order entered November 19, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00587-CR

BABAK TAHERZADEH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-12037-J

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 16, 2020 third motion for an 

extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER 

appellant’s brief due on December 16, 2020.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
March 7, 2002

23422

#### Doe Children, In re

Affirmed
# C_2016202EN.01016401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/164 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/164

---

Article 270

(ex Article 236 TEC)

(ex Article 236 TEC)

The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have jurisdiction in any dispute between the Union and its servants within the limits and under the conditions laid down in the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the Union.

---
AAM-13-117-E

January 8, 2013

 Exemption No. 10256A

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0422

Mr. Dale Schneider

Director of Operations, Chief Pilot and DER

Schneider Flight Service dba ARC Aviation

5836 Fayette Road, Suite 204

Durham, NC 27713

Dear Mr. Schneider:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10256. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 28, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Schneider Flight Service dba ARC Aviation (Schneider) for an extension 

of Exemption No. 10256. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) allows Schneider, which is operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Schneider.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10256

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Schneider are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Schneider part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10256 to May 31, 2015, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser, MD

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     We have issued our report dated January 25, 2002, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements of Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc. and
Subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 30, 2001. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
report in the Registration Statements of Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc. and
Subsidiaries on Form S-8 Registration Statement Numbers 33-32835, 33-38748,
33-42451, 33-49730, 33-83074, 333-19229 and 333-49110.


                                                        /s/ Grant Thornton LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 29, 2002
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 264 

Expressing support for Lunchtime Music on the Mall in the Nation’s capital 

to benefit the District of Columbia and regional residents as well as 

visitors and honor the public service of the performers and partners. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2015 

Ms. NORTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for Lunchtime Music on the Mall in 

the Nation’s capital to benefit the District of Columbia 

and regional residents as well as visitors and honor the 

public service of the performers and partners. 

Whereas the ‘‘National Mall Revitalization and Designation 

Act’’ seeks to enliven the National Mall for residents and 

visitors; 

Whereas the National Park Service, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the Smithsonian Institution, the DC Commission on the Arts and Humanities, 

and the DC Department of Parks and Recreation have 

now each agreed to be a partner and producer of the 

2015 Lunchtime Music on the Mall every Tuesday and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 264 IH 

Thursday from noon until 1:00 p.m. during the summer 

months; 

Whereas the National Mall is a national and DC tourist attraction; 

Whereas many Federal and other office workers work downtown and in the vicinity of the National Mall; 

Whereas the National Mall is a national treasure, supported 

by United States taxpayers to provide a unique park 

space with potential for a variety of outdoor enjoyment; 

Whereas many excellent amateur and professional musicians 

reside in the District of Columbia and the national capital region; 

Whereas the National Mall provides a natural stage for the 

display of city and regional talent; 

Whereas the National Park Service has made available a central location frequented by visitors and commuters alike 

for Lunchtime Music on the Mall; 

Whereas Lunchtime Music on the Mall offers benefits to 

many of the 20,000,000 visitors annually to Washington, 

DC; and 

Whereas 2015 is the fourth season for Lunchtime Music on 

the Mall: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the House recognizes and commends— 

3 (1) Lunchtime Music on the Mall as an en4 hancement to urban life and musical culture in the 

5 Nation’s capital and to appreciation of the National 

6 Mall; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 264 IH 

1 (2) local performers that bringing their talents 

2 to Lunchtime Music on the Mall; and 

3 (3) the National Park Service, the Washington 

4 Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the Smithso5 nian Institution, the DC Department of Parks and 

6 Recreation, and the DC Commission on the Arts and 

7 Humanities for their public service in providing live 

8 music performances at no charge to the public. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      32.2






**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL MANAGER**


Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
      undersigned, Linda J. Haines, Principal Financial Manager of Nutrition
      Management Services Company, a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), does
      hereby certify, to her knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of the
      Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
      15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
      in
      the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
              Linda
              J. HainesLinda
                J. HainesPrincipal
                Financial Manager





November
      19, 2007
# C_2016202EN.01018901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/189 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/189

---

Article 327

(ex Articles 27a to 27e, 40 to 40b and 43 to 45 TEU and ex Articles 11 and 11a TEC)

(ex Articles 27a

e

b

a

Any enhanced cooperation shall respect the competences, rights and obligations of those Member States which do not participate in it. Those Member States shall not impede its implementation by the participating Member States.

---
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeWhat We DoMajor Projects
Thurgood Marshall Façade Repair
        
                  The Basics
      
Location
    Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building

Status
    On Going
End Date
    2026Work to stabilize façade elements at the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building has begun.

Thurgood Marshall, constructed in 1992, is faced in a stone veneer that is deteriorating. The Architect of the Capitol and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts have mutually approved a targeted, risk-based approach that prioritizes waterproofing and façade stabilization, especially around the areas nearest to public walkways.

To support the work, the south sidewalk on F Street, NW, and Columbus Circle sidewalk adjoining Thurgood Marshall will be closed to pedestrians for the duration of the project. The north sidewalk on F Street, NW, and west sidewalk on Columbus Circle will remain open.

Signage will be placed directing pedestrians to open sidewalks which are ADA accessible and not impacted during this work.

**The project is estimated to be complete spring 2026.**

Image
    Map of project area.
          
    
      

      We love our jobs. Do you? Come work with us.
        View Job Listings Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### State v. Driessen

25748

08/09/2004

Affirmed
June 4, 2008

27477

#### Gomes v. Hawaii Labor Relations Bd.

Affirmed
CONSUMER MARGINAL ENERGY

RATES

James E. McMahon, LBNL

DOE Workshop

November 9-10, 1998

1

f06

*

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 38II
Economic Justification:

Two of Seven Factors Are Affected by

Marginal Energy Rates

* Economic impact on manufacturers & consumers

* Lifetime operating cost savings compared to increased

price

* Total projected energy savings

* Lessening of utility or performance

* Impact of any lessening of competition

* Need for national energy conservation

* Other factors the Secretary considers relevant

(e.g., oil security, environment)

2

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 38II
What's changing?

· PREVIOUSLY: Consumer energy bill savings

were estimated using average energy prices (national or by utility).

· NEW APPROACH: Estimated consumer

marginal energy rates will be used in

calculating energy bill savings for households

or buildings. In other words, the energy savings

will be valued at the margin, not at average

energy prices.

3

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 38II
Consumer Marginal Energy Rates:

Method

* Obtain database of individual customers or

buildings

· Design nationally representative sample of

customers

· Collect tariff information

· Develop and test method for matching tariffs with

customers (buildings)

· Calculate marginal rates for sample buildings

· Use sample marginal rates as estimates of

population marginal rates

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 38II
Extract consumer marginal energy rates

* Each sample building has baseline energy use

data and can be assigned to a tariff

* Calculate monthly energy bills (baseline) for

sample

* Calculate annual energy savings due to

standards.

* Distribute annual energy savings to months

* Calculate monthly energy bills for sample under

standards. (Hourly for time-of-use customers.)

* Use sample marginal rates as estimates of

national marginal rates. Calculate bill savings.

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 38II
Data Sources

Buildings database (MAISY)

- ca. 90,000 commercial; 60,000 residential

- stratified by state

- provides energy-related customer characteristics

- household load profiles

* Tariffs

- web-sites (APPA,EEI,NRECA utilities)

- commercial vendors

- public utility commissions

- utilities

* Monthly end use load profiles

- published literature

- utility studies

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 38II
## 14 

# .5 Polar Sea Ice Extent and Northern Lat itudes Temperature, 1880-2013 

# 100

14 80 13.5 60 13 40 12.5 20 12 

# A.V 0 11.5 -20 11 

## 10.5 ~ 0 

## 10 -60 ~~~0 ~~~h ~~~~ ~~~h ^°'0 0 ~ °' ~ h ~ °' ~ 0 ^°, ~ h ~ °, ,~ 0 ~ °'ry h ►.~~~ ~

°' ~ h ~ °' ~ 0 ~ °' ~ h ^°' ~ 0 ^ ~ b h +`°, ~ 0 ~ °' ~h '°' ,~0 ,.°'

,~h t. ~~ 0 ►.°j ~ h ,.°' ~~ +`°'

~ h ryo0 `yo0

h `yo ~~ ~ ,O

~ h Sources: For temperature--ftp://sidads.colorado.edu/DATASETS/NOAA/G02135/ For sea ice after 1978--ftp://sidads.colorado.edu/DATASETS/NOAA/G02135/

For sea ice before 1979--http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/SEAICE/timeseries.1870-2008 (National Snow and Ice Data center) 

### Annual data and 10-year moving averages; data mainly fron NOAA--see footnote 

## Sea Ice Extent, million squ e kilometers (left axis 1 ~ 

## }, r ~ r

~ ~ 

### Temperature, deviation from 1951-1980 average, 

## , t 

# ~ ' : ` 

# l ~ I

I ~
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00296

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF A.W. §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 324th District Court

of Tarrant County ( 324

- 013484

- 76 )

April 14, 2 0 22

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

It is furthe r ordered that Appellant Father shall pay all of the costs of this

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Mike Wallach

___________________ Justice Mike Wallach
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50391 Summary Calendar

JANIE T. OJEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-99-CV-815-JN

-------------------- February 20, 2002 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Janie Trevino Ojeda (“Ojeda”) appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of her application for supplemental security income (SSI). Ojeda contends that the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) findings were not supported by substantial evidence and that the ALJ did not apply the proper legal standard for her age. “Appellate review of the [Commissioner’s] denial of disability benefits is limited to determining whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record andNo. 01-50391 -2- whether the proper legal standards were used in evaluating the evidence.” Villa v. Sullivan , 895 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1990)(citation omitted); Ripley v. Chater , 67 F.3d 552, 555 (5th Cir. 1995). “‘Substantial evidence is more than a scintilla, less than a preponderance, and is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’” Villa , 895 F.2d at 1021-22 (citation omitted). WE AFFIRM, substantially for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s opinion Ojeda v. Massanari , No. A-99-CV-815- AA (W.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2001) (unpublished).
AFFIRMED.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Who Can Be An Attending

Veterinarian?

Last Modified: 

Print

Attending Veterinarian Information - Select a Topic - ▾ Go

The Animal Welfare Regulations define who can be an accredited veterinarian based

on education, training and/or experience, and authority. 
Specifically, the regulations define an attending veterinarian as a person who has:

Graduated from a veterinary school accredited by the American Veterinary

Medical Association (AVMA), or has a certification from the AVMA if a foreign

veterinary graduate, or has equivalent formal education as determined by the

Administrator,

Received training and/or experience in the care and management of the

species being attended, and

Been given direct or delegated authority by the regulated facility for activities

involving the veterinary care of their animals.

If the attending veterinarian does not have training or experience with every species

at the facility, they are encouraged to consult with another veterinarian who has

experience with these species. Individuals with expertise on a given species, such as

behaviorists or personnel at facilities with a good track record for USDA compliance

and animal welfare, may also be consulted. The facility may choose to employ an

additional veterinarian with expertise in this species as well.

What about State licensure or accreditation?

The Animal Welfare Regulations do not require State licensure or accreditation for

attending veterinarians. However, State licensure is required to issue health

certificates. It is also required in most States to administer rabies vaccinations.

Accreditation may also be required for issuing health certificates for interstate or

international transport.

In cases where the attending veterinarian is not licensed, a facility can use a

consulting veterinarian who is licensed to provide services regulated by that State

under the oversight of the attending veterinarian.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus II Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2004 (the Report), I, Sam P. Douglass, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                                 
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 17, 2004 |  |  |  | /S/    SAM P. DOUGLASS                          
|                    |  |  |  |                                                 
|                    |  |  |  | Sam P. Douglass Chairman Chief Executive Officer