alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MICHAEL P. PATTON,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 324, 2024

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. N86015075DI

§ 

§ 

Submitted: September 4, 2024

Decided: September 12, 2024

ORDER

On July 10, 2024, the Superior Court sentenced the appellant, Michael P. 

Patton, for a violation of probation. This Court received Patton’s notice of appeal 

from the Superior Court’s decision on August 12, 2024. The Senior Court Clerk 

issued, by certified mail, a notice directing Patton to show cause why his appeal 

should not be dismissed as untimely filed.1 The notice instructed Patton to respond 

within ten days and advised that if he did not respond, dismissal of the appeal would 

be deemed to be unopposed. On August 22, 2024, the Court received the certifiedmail receipt indicating that the notice had been delivered. The appellant having 

1 DEL. SUPR. CT. R. 6.
2

failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period, 

dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b) 

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Noxious Weeds Program: Regulations

Last Modified: 

Print

Major Authorities

The Plant Protection Act (PDF; 130 Kb)

Federal Noxious Weed Act (PDF; 6 Kb)

Federal Seed Act

The Noxious Weed Control and Eradication Act of 2004 (PDF; 64 Kb)

Summary presentation on NWCEA (PDF; 3.78 Mb)

Regulations

Noxious Weed Regulations

Noxious Seed Regulation

Witchweed Quarantine
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 363 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the power 

of Congress to protect the right to vote. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2015 

Mr. NOLAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the power of Congress to protect the right to vote. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. PROTECTING THE RIGHT TO VOTE. 

3 It is the sense of the House of Representatives that— 

4 (1) Congress has the power to prohibit voter 

5 suppression activities; 

6 (2) in order to increase voter access and partici7 pation, Congress should require every State to create 

8 and maintain an online voter registration system 

9 and to automatically register eligible voters whose 

10 information is contained in the State’s motor vehicle 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 363 IH 

1 license registration system (with a 21-day opt-out 

2 period for those who wish to be taken off the reg3 istry); and 

4 (3) Congress should make Election Day a legal 

5 public holiday. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
January 5, 1999

21652

#### Hawaiian Soc. of Naturopathic Physicians v. Graulty

Affirmed
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6087

BRYAN KEITH RICHARDSON,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

RUSSELL PERDUE,

 Respondent – Appellee,

and

R. PERDUE, Warden; SMITH, A.W.; DOES 1 THRU 8,

 Respondents.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:14-cv-00061-FPS-JSK)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryan Keith Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bryan Keith Richardson, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Richardson v. Perdue, No. 5:14-cv-00061-

FPS-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement Nos.
333-105380,  333-95705,  333-01969,  333-17823, 333-17825, 333-70656, 333-87890,
333-115677,  and  333-124967  on Form S-8 of our  reports  dated  March 8, 2006,
relating to the  financial  statements  of  Applebee's  International,  Inc. and
subsidiaries  and management's  report on the  effectiveness of internal control
over  financial  reporting,  appearing  in this  Annual  Report  on Form 10-K of
Applebee's  International,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  for the  fiscal  year ended
December 25, 2005.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
March 9, 2006
#### Bueno v. Bueno

23778

02/11/2002

Affirmed
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

February 12, 2010

Before

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

CRYSTAL ELUSTRA and CHRIS LOPEZ, ] Appeal from the United

as mother and next friend of MORIAH ] States District Court for

ELUSTRA and NAJATI ELUSTRA, ] the Northern District of

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, ] Illinois, Eastern Division.

 ]

No. 09-2183 v. ] No. 08 C 3162

 ]

TOM MINEO and BRAD FRALICH, ] John W. Darrah,

individually and doing business as ] Judge.

BUFFALO WILD WINGS, ]

 Defendants-Appellees. ]

Order

The opinion of this court issued on February 9, 2010, is amended as follows:

Page 18, line 6, change “to each defendant” to “to each plaintiff.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                       9,379,020
<SECURITIES>                                   294,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,633,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,306,202
<PP&E>                                      54,369,633
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,008,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,667,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,882,864
<BONDS>                                     26,997,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,786,376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,667,080
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,543,226
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,002,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,895,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,645,816
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,645,816
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,645,816
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the condensed
consolidated financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statement.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,182
<SECURITIES>                                    15,032
<RECEIVABLES>                                      268
<ALLOWANCES>                                        36
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,011
<PP&E>                                           4,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,955
<SALES>                                            557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   557
<CGS>                                               64
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (162)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (379)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (814)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (814)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
#### Rucker et al., Appellants, *v.*Personal Finance Co. of Columbus, Inc., et al.; Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. et al., Appellees.

(No. 31686

Decided March 9, 1949.)

*Mr. Matthew L. Bigger,*for appellants.

*Mr. Henry A. Reinhard,’Messrs. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease*and *Mr. Carl H. Tangeman,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman,. Stewart and Taft, JJ., conciir.

Turner, J., not participating.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

R.D., a child

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 937

[ December 17, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Stacy M. Ross , Judge; L.T. Case No. 19003065DL

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano,

Assistant Attorney General, W est Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., M AY and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)I, Edward J. Puisis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dayton Superior Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        March 17, 2008   /s/ Edward J. Puisis   Edward J. Puisis    Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusCapitol Hill Facts
What is the function of the U.S. Capitol?
        
                  The United States Capitol Building houses the meeting chambers of the Senate (in the north wing) and the House of Representatives (in the south wing) – the two bodies that compose the legislative branch of the American government. It also includes the offices of congressional leadership, and it is used for ceremonies of national importance such as presidential inaugurations and the lying in state of eminent persons. The U.S. Capitol is also a museum of American art and history and is visited by millions of people every year. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply563Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  SHELLY RENEE B... (not verified)PermalinkMay 16, 2017 - 11:35amDear Humanitarian, thank YOU for the wonderful ramp. For the momma and her baby ducks. Praying for a more humane world of humans!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE CHARTER OF
                    EAST END INVESTMENT, INC.

     The undersigned corporation hereby executes these Articles of Amendment
pursuant to the General Corporation Law of the State of Nevada for the purpose
of amending its Charter as follows:

              1.  The name of the corporation is East End Investment, Inc.

              2.  The corporation hereby amends its name from East End
Investment, Inc. to The Theme Factory, Inc.

              3.  The date of the adoption of this amendment is October 16,
1989.

              4.  The number of shares outstanding and the number of shares
entitled to vote thereon is 1,034,500.

              5.  The number of shares voting for the amendment is 1,000,000
and the number against in zero (0).

              6.  There is only one class of stock, common voting stock,
together with warrants which are exercisable for common voting stock but no
warrants have been exercised.

              7.  This amendment does not give rise to dissenters' rights
or other shareholder's rights in that the only amendment is the change of
name.

              S.  Notice was given to all shareholders of the proposed
change by notice dated October 4, 1989 and a shareholder's resolution was
adopted at a duly convened shareholder's meeting on October 16, 1989, at which
all shareholders in attendance unanimously approved the amendment.

    In WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles are signed by the President and
Secretary of the corporation this 16th day of October, 1989.

                     East End Investment, Inc.

                            By:/s/Charles S. Barkley
                       Secretary
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centennial
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended November 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officer's knowledge:


      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Thomas Fitzpatrick
-----------------------
Thomas Fitzpatrick
Chief Financial Officer
March 9, 2000

22695

#### Zoeller v. Arcadia Retirement Residence

Affirmed
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50707

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS REYES-NAVA, 

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-00-CR-425-1-H

- - - - - - - - - -

February 15,2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesus Reyes-Nava appeals his sentence following his guilty

plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Reyes argues that his sentence

should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8

U.S.C. § 1326(a). Reyes acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court

review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 
No. 00-50707

- 2 -

Reyes’ argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S.

at 235. 

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.