alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                    1,302,622
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               514,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  0
<PP&E>                                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           47,318,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             0
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                               28,784,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             47,318,014
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          3,188,766
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          2,048,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             31,888
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          433,375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             674,840
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         674,840
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                674,840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                                     5
<LEGEND>
 This schedule  contains  summary  information  extracted from the  accompanying
 financial  statements  and is  qualified  in it entirety by  reference  to such
 financial statement.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                               14,663,888
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        12,631,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          2,810,335
<INVENTORY>                                                           8,454,809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     33,514,219
<PP&E>                                                                3,730,160
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        1,931,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       53,783,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 7,572,671
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                               4,000
<COMMON>                                                                 17,397
<OTHER-SE>                                                           44,379,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         53,783,204
<SALES>                                                               4,834,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      5,261,557
<CGS>                                                                 2,294,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         2,337,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      5,950,974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        614,224
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        2,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (3,450,662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (3,450,662)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (3,450,662)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                            (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            (0.21)


</TABLE>
#### Andrew Schneider, Plaintiff, *v.*Ralph Barone, Defendant,

County Court, Schenectady County,

July 8, 1959.

*Vorton B. Boghosian*for defendant.

*McDonald King*for plaintiff.

Archibald C. Wemple, J.

It appears that a default judgment for $2,959.80, was taken in Schenectady County Court on November 23, 1955, approximately four years ago. The defendant then and during all proceedings here and in Bankruptcy Court, has been represented by competent counsel at all times. In fact it appears from the moving papers that the defendant has been represented by several different counsel during successive periods prior to and subsequent to the time judgment was taken. Following the judgment an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding was instituted against this defendant by several creditors. This proceeding is still pending.

The defendant has failed to give a satisfactory explanation for the long delay in making the application herein. Neither has this defendant attached to his moving papers a proposed answer to the claim under which the judgment herein was granted. In fact, no meritorious defense to the claim has been indicated, nor has there been shown any mistake, surprise, inadvertence or excusable neglect on the part of the defendant or any of his several attorneys.

The defendant’s contention that the opening of the judgment herein would permit the vacating or discontinuance of the involuntary bankruptcy proceeding is without merit. Bankruptcies are predicated upon creditors ’ claims, not judgments as such. If indeed this defendant has any claim against one Alexander G-rasso, as alleged in the defendant’s affidavit, such claim appears to belong to the defendant’s trustee in bankruptcy, and/or the defendant herein, as their interests may appear. Frankly, it is beyond the understanding of this court hoW any claim against Grasso, a third party, has any bearing upon any *1010alleged defense of the defendant to the claim of the plaintiff herein.

The defendant herein has had ample time and opportunity to move to open the default judgment entered herein. In fact the defendant was once given an opportunity by this court to open this default and have his “ day in court ”, but defendant neglected to take advantage of this order. There has been no satisfactory explanation for the long delay or for defendant’s failure to proceed to open the default herein and try the case on the merits, under the terms as provided in the decision of this court on January 31, 1956.

The court herein points out that section 108 of the Civil Practice Act designates a limit of one year after notice of judgment for a person to apply to be relieved from a judgment taken against him, through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect.

Since the application was not made within one year, nor any showing of any of the four grounds above specified, nor is any fraud apparent, nor any valid reason stated for the long delay, nor any meritorious defense or proposed answer submitted, the application herein is denied.

Enter order accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 84346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Evaluating 
Neurocognitive Complications of Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes.
    Date: March 12, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Michele L. Barnard, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, 
National Institutes of Health, Room 7353, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, (301) 594-8898, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#76141704181704121b36130e02041758181f12121d58181f1e58111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e5c5f4c505f4c5a537e5b464a4c5f1050575a5a551050575610595148">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 29, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-26631 Filed 12-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Commenting Opportunities: Animal

Health

Last Modified: 

Print

Tell us what you think!

Public participation is vital to the regulatory and decision-making process at APHIS.

Your input helps us make better-informed decisions about actions that may interest

or impact you. We offer many opportunities for public comment on animal health
issues. You can view and provide feedback on proposed rules, concept papers, pest

and disease lists, and more.

Latest Commenting Opportunities

7/10/23

APHIS Announces Listening Sessions on Chronic Wasting Disease Herd Certification

Program Standards

9/05/22

USDA Publishes Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on New Framework for

Livestock Disease Indemnity Valuation

Ongoing Opportunities for Comment

Animal and Plant Diseases and Pests of Concern

For the 2018 Farm Bill, APHIS developed a list of 59 pests and diseases that pose the

most significant threat to U.S. agriculture. If you have information about a pest not

included on our list or has the potential to harm agriculture, please let us know here.

Related Links

APHIS: All Federal Register Posts

APHIS News and Updates

Stay in the Know

For the latest news about Veterinary Services, sign up for email updates.

Subscribe
EXHIBIT 99.2


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
              Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



     I, Eric M. Specter, the Chief Financial Officer of Charming Shoppes, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

     (1)  the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended February 1, 2003 (the
          "Form10-K"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.





Dated: April 15, 2003                                 /S/ ERIC M. SPECTER
                                                      -------------------
                                                      Eric M. Specter
                                                      Chief Financial Officer


[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Charming Shoppes, Inc. and will be retained by Charming Shoppes,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
July 30, 1998

20979

#### McElveen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  742,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          29,318
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 797,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        445,196
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           390
<OTHER-SE>                                     258,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   797,706
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,652
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (108,566)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (18,846)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (89,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (89,720)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.30)
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Bailey

17360

10/16/96

Reversed, Vacated and Remanded
#### STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Walter Edmund KEEN, Respondent.

No. 2492.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 20, 1976.

John M. Amick, Gen. Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Ass’n, Oklahoma City, for complainant.

Kainor Carson, Tulsa, for respondent.

SIMMS, Justice:

Respondent attorney was convicted of the felonious crime of Knowingly Concealing Stolen Property in the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, and sentenced to a term of one year in the county jail and a fine of $500.00 in accordance with a jury verdict.

No appeal was perfected from the judgment and sentence, and the conviction has become final. In fact, the sentence has been executed.

Pursuant to the Rules Governing the Oklahoma Bar Association, the Association filed with this Court a copy of the Information, and a certified copy of the Judgment of Conviction, and gave Notice to Respondent to appear and Show Cause, if any he had, why he should not be disciplined. See: 5 O.S.1971, Ch. 1-App. 1, Art. 10, Sec. 4(b) and (c).

At the Show Cause Hearing before this Court, Respondent personally appeared with counsel, and stipulated that the conviction had become final; that the offense involved “moral turpitude”; acknowledged that he was subject to disciplinary proceedings; and informed the Court that following the conviction by jury, he had voluntarily suspended himself from the practice of law.

Respondent further waived any claim of right under 5 O.S., Ch. 1-App. 1, Art. 10, Sec. 4(d) to submit a certified copy of the transcript taken in the trial tribunal. Respondent did not offer any evidence in mitigation, other than to maintain his innocence of the charge.

The record clearly shows that both procedural and substantive due process requirements have been met.

Complainant and Respondent both waived the filing of briefs, therefore, the only issue before this Court is the nature of discipline to be imposed upon Respondent.

In *State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association*v. *Seeyle,*Okl., 490 P.2d 1095, it was held that:

> “This Court will order a member of the Oklahoma Bar Association disbarred where such member has been convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude and the judgment of conviction has been affirmed on final appeal.”

There is no question as to the finality of the conviction in the instant case. No issue having been raised as to the conviction involving a crime of “moral turpitude”; *1134and no evidence in mitigation having been offered; it is the Order of this Court that Respondent, Walter Edmund Keen, BE DISBARRED.

Notice of the decision herein arrived at shall be given by the Chief Justice to the Respondent and the Oklahoma Bar Association in accordance with 5 O.S.1971, Ch. 1-App. 1, Art. 10, Sec. 16(c).

RESPONDENT DISBARRED.

DAVISON, LAVENDER, BARNES and DOOLIN, JJ., concur.

WILLIAMS, C. J., HODGES, V. C. J., and IRWIN and BERRY, JJ., concur in results.
Exhibit 99.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFG Investment Trust D (the Trust), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Trusts Managing Trustee, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 (1)  the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 
 /s/ Richard K Brock
 Richard K Brock
 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of AFG ASIT Corp.,
 the Managing Trustee of the Trust
 (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 May 12, 2003
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Randy Coffee (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 16, 2021 - 9:13amThank you all fir your dedicated support to our nation’s symbols and preserving their legacy for future generations. You are the real Patriots. We all owe you immense gratitude for the care and love you put in. Be safe and be well in your work.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2016202EN.01019201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/192 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/192

---

Article 336

(ex Article 283 TEC)

(ex Article 283 TEC)

The European Parliament and the Council shall, acting by means of regulations in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the other institutions concerned, lay down the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the Union.

---
June 17, 2005

25920

#### Yun Ki Cho v. Hawaii Nissan, Inc.

Affirmed