alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


         The following are the subsidiaries of the Company. The voting stock of
each subsidiary is directly or indirectly 100% owned by the Company. Employment
Solutions, Inc. is an active subsidiary. Each of the remaining subsidiaries is
inactive.

(1) Employment Solutions, Inc., incorporated in South Carolina

(2) RSI Holdings of Florida, Inc., incorporated in Florida.

(3) Sunbelt Distributors, Inc., incorporated in South Carolina.

(4) HomeAdd Financial Corporation, incorporated in South Carolina.

(5) HomeAdd Financial Services Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of HomeAdd
    Financial Corporation, incorporated in North Carolina.
Fac ID Facility Name Street City

4609 A-1 Precious Metal Plating, Inc. 36 Sixth Road Woburn

15 ACTON METAL PROCESSING CORP. 47 ATHLETIC FIELD RD. WALTHAM

17 ADTEC ELECTROPLATING INC. 125 GLENN ST. LAWRENCE

18 ADTEC ELECTROPLATING INC. 22 BALLARD RD. LAWRENCE

3504 Aerospace Support 44 Russo Circle Agawam

73 AOTCO METAL FINISHING CO. INC. 11 SUBURBAN PARK DR. BILLERICA

4754 Callahan, F.M., & Son, Inc. 22 Sharon Street Malden

155 CAMBRIDGE PLATING CO. 39 HITTINGER ST. BELMONT

171 Central Metal Finishing, Inc. 80 Flagship Drive North Andover

3503 Chrome Plating of Waltham 265 Pleasant Street Watertown

4779 Ciardi, E., Co., Inc. 96 Liberty St. Chelsea

4782 Circle Finishing, Inc. 19 Graf Road Newburyport

4783 Circle Metal Finishing, Inc. 55 Chase Street Methuen

4792 Coastal Metal Finishing, Inc. 2 Little's Court Merrimac

3508 CPI-Beverly Microwave Division 150 Sohier Road Beverly

3520 Danaher Tool Group 116 Wason Avenue Springfield

241 DAV-TECH PLATING INC. 40 CEDAR HILL ST. MARLBOROUGH

4869 Everett Plating & Metal Finishing Company P.O. Box 928 Saugus

345 FOUNTAIN PLATING CO. INC. 492 PROSPECT AVE. WEST SPRINGFIELD

3521 Garrepy Platers 722 Plantation Street Worcester

4909 Gill, Patrick J. & Sons 9 Fowle Street Woburn

436 INDEPENDENT PLATING CO. INC. 35 NEW ST. WORCESTER

3519 KRH Rolls, Inc. 10 Lucci Drive Orange

5006 La Rosee, H., & Sons, Inc. 15 Broad Street Hudson

508 Light Metal Platers Inc. 70 Clematis Avenue WALTHAM

3511 LS Starrett Company 121 Crescent Street Athol

5068 Mystic Plating Corp. 213 Corporation Way Medford

611 NATIONAL METAL FINISHING CORP. 175 PROGRESS AVE. SPRINGFIELD

3505 PIO. Valley Plating 60 Canal Street Holyoke

693 POLY-METAL FINISHING INC. 1 ALLEN ST. BLDG. 218 SPRINGFIELD

3514 Royal Plating & Polishing Co., Inc. 740 Crane Avenue Pittsfield

3516 South Shore Plating Company, Inc. 28 Forest Ave. Quincy

829 STANDARD PLATING INC. 964 MAIN ST WEST SPRINGFIELD

938 VALLEY PLATING INC. 412 ALBANY ST. SPRINGFIELD

3513 Walton & Lonsbury Incorporated 78 North Avenue Attleboro

962 WESTFIELD ELECTROPLATING CO. 68 N. ELM ST. WESTFIELD

3517 Westford Anodizing Corporation 12 North Main Street Westford

964 Whitman Company, Inc. 356 South Avenue Whitman
County State Zip Hard DecorativeAnodizing

MA 01801

MIDDLESEXMA 02451

ESSEX MA 01840 X

ESSEX MA 01843

MA 01101 X

MIDDLESEXMA 01821 X X

MA 02148

MIDDLESEXMA 02478 X

MA 01845 6106 X X

MA 02472

MA 02150

MA 01950 4114 X

MA 01844 3771 X

MA 01860

MA 01915 X

MA 01107 X

MIDDLESEXMA 01752 X

MA 01906

HAMPDENMA 01089 X X

MA 01605

MA 01801

WORCESTERMA 01605 X X

MA 01364 X

MA 01749

Boston MA 02154 X

MA 01331 X

MA 02155 5195

HAMPDENMA 01104 X X

MA 01040 X

HAMPDENMA 01108

MA 01201 X X

MA 02169 X

 SPRINGFIELD MA 01089 X X X

HAMPDENMA 01105 X

MA 02703 X

HAMPDENMA 01085 X X

MA 01886 X

Plymouth MA 02382 X
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      21,896,646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,212,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,109,346
<PP&E>                                     107,695,973
<DEPRECIATION>                              48,775,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,029,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,085,531
<BONDS>                                     38,467,220
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,476,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                82,029,526
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,649,964
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,131,994
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             844,967
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,673,003
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,673,003
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,673,003
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 522 

Supporting the designation of November 1 through November 7, 2015, as 

‘‘National Apprenticeship Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2015 

Miss RICE of New York (for herself, Mr. POCAN, Ms. WILSON of Florida, and 

Mr. POLIS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of November 1 through November 

7, 2015, as ‘‘National Apprenticeship Week’’. 

Whereas there are more than 445,000 active apprenticeships 

throughout the United States; 

Whereas an apprentice earns an average starting annual salary of over $50,000, and can earn $300,000 more over 

the course of his or her career than someone who does 

not serve as an apprentice; 

Whereas for every $1 spent on apprenticeships, employers receive $1.47 back in increased productivity; 

Whereas apprenticeships provide the training and skills needed to meet the demands of a 21st-century economy; 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 522 IH 

Whereas the Department of Labor recently awarded $175 

million in American Apprenticeship Grants to 46 recipients; 

Whereas apprenticeships offer employers the opportunity to 

build a continuous stream of talent in-house, instead of 

looking outside to hire new workers; and 

Whereas more than 150,000 employers and labor management organizations participate in registered apprenticeship programs: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Ap3 prenticeship Week’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the importance of apprentice5 ships in developing a well-trained and highly-skilled 

6 workforce; and 

7 (3) commends organizations and employers that 

8 actively support apprenticeship programs. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 450 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 450

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 27, 2015.
    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution, the House shall 
proceed to the consideration in the House of the bill (H.R. 597) to reauthorize 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States, and for other purposes. All points 
of order against consideration of the bill are waived. An amendment in the 
nature of a substitute consisting of the text of H.R. 3611, as introduced, shall 
be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on 
any further amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services or their 
respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to the consideration of 
H.R. 597.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Martin v. Ozawa

23444

12/14/2001

Affirmed
Exhibit 99.2

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ANDTREASURER PURSUANT**

**TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of AutoImmune Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, as of the date of this statement, theCompany’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the three period ended March 31, 2003. 

 

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section906 of the Sabarnes-Oxley Act of 2002. This statement is not “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Act or any other federal or state law or regulation.

 

Date: May 15, 2003 

By: /s/    Heather A.Ellerkamp                    

Name: Heather A. Ellerkamp 

Title: Director of Finance andTreasurer
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Commercial Truck Fee

Last Modified: 

Print

The AQI program inspects commercial trucks and their cargo arriving at land ports in

the customs territory of the United States from Mexico and Canada.

User fee regulations (7 CFR 354.3(a)) define a commercial truck as: “A self-propelled

vehicle designed and used for transporting property for compensation or hire. Empty

trucks and truck cabs without trailers fitting this description are included.”

Commercial truck fee regulations are listed in 7 CFR 354.3(c).

The Cost and What It Covers

The current commercial truck fee is $7.29 per crossing or $291.60 for the calendar

year (see 7 CFR 354.3(c)). This fee covers the direct and indirect costs of clearing a

truck, including:

Reviewing manifests and documentation with incoming cargo

Targeted, risk-based cargo inspection or clearance.

Inspecting agricultural and agricultural-related commodities, compliant wood

packaging material, and packing materials to screen for the presence of plant

pests and contaminants, ensure compliance with regulations, and determine

entry status
Inspecting the truck and conveyance for contaminants, pests, or invasive

species

Identifying pests found during inspection

Safeguarding shipments pending APHIS’ decision on treatment or final

disposition

Issuing phytosanitary permits for commodities moved by truck

Paying the Fee

As described in 7 CFR 354.3(c), you can pay the commercial truck user fee upon

each arrival at a U.S. land border port or prepay by purchasing a transponder that

allows unlimited crossings within the calendar year. U.S. Customs and Border

Protection remits commercial truck fee collections to APHIS monthly.

Transponders save time and money by:

Offering a reduced annual inspection fee.

Decreasing border wait times because you have prepaid for AQI services and

don’t have to wait in line to pay the cashier.

Refer to CBP’s User Fee, Transponder, and Decal Information for instructions on how

to apply for a transponder or prepay the single crossing fee.

Reimbursable Overtime Services

Customers may request and receive AQI services associated with activities typically

covered by an AQI user fee outside the normal tour of duty of the employee(s)

providing the requested service. In such cases, overtime charges may be assessed

as outlined in 7 CFR 354.1.

APHIS Reimbursable Overtime Services

Refer to the APHIS Reimbursable Overtime Services web page for additional

information including how to pay the reimbursable overtime fee.

CBP Reimbursable Overtime Services
Any requests for agriculture reimbursable overtime will be made in accordance with

CBP port policy. Please contact your local CBP Port of Entry.
#### Brian MAGUIRE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Sam W. SMITH, Warden, Utah State Prison, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 14145.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 16, 1976.

Brian Maguire, pro se.

*698Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., William W. Barrett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

CROCKETT, Justice:

Brian Edward Maguire appeals from the refusal of the district court to grant his petition in habeas corpus in which he seeks to have declared void his conviction of second-degree murder.

Defendant was charged with first-degree murder. He waived trial by jury and chose to be tried by the court. The court dismissed the first-degree murder charge and found the defendant guilty of murder in the second degree. Petitioner appealed that conviction, claiming that it was error for the trial court to allow him to waive his right of trial by jury; and he also contended that due to rulings which seemed to render the death penalty as provided in our statute incapable of being imposed, the court 'was without jurisdiction to try him on a first-degree murder charge. These arguments were considered and his conviction was af firmed.1

In addition to raising the same arguments in this proceeding, petitioner also contends that because he was charged with first-degree murder, and that charge was dismissed, that this should be deemed to include dismissal of what he says is the different crime of second-degree murder.

We have frequently said: that habeas corpus cannot properly be used as a means of taking a belated appeal and invoking claims of error that could and should have been raised timely and in the regular means provided for appeal.2 Further, it is and always has been the law that second-degree murder is a lesser included offense in first-degree murder; and consequently that one charged with first-degree murder is also charged with second-degree murder; and that if the evidence so justifies, he may be convicted of the latter offense, under a charge of first-degree murder.3

The denial of the petition is affirmed. No costs awarded.

HENRIOD, C. J., and ELLETT, TUCKETT and MAUGHAN, JJ.', concur.

1

. *State v. Maguire,*529 P.2d 421 (Utah 1974).

2

. *Bruce v. East, Sheriff,*43 Utah 327, 134 P. 1175 (1913); *Bryant v. Turner,*19 Utah 2d 284, 431 P.2d 121 (1967).

3

. *State v. Brennan,*13 Utah 2d 195, 371 P.2d 27 (1962) ; *State v. Kulcis,*65 Utah 362, 237 P. 476 (1925).
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, Mark R. Tauscher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  November 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Mark R. Tauscher    |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                          |   | Mark R. Tauscher        |
|                          |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, James G. Thomasch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  November 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/ James G. Thomasch   |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                          |   | James G. Thomasch       |
|                          |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
October 28, 2004

25740

#### Lolohea v. State

Affirmed
#### John L. COTTON, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. Robert Jerry HAND, Appellee (Defendant below).

No. 4760.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

April 20, 1977.

John L. Cotton, pro se.

Richard H. Peek, Casper, for appellee.

Before GUTHRIE, C. J., and McCLIN-TOCK, RAPER, THOMAS and ROSE, JJ.

ORDER

GUTHRIE, Chief Justice.

Appellee Robert Jerry Hand having filed a motion to dismiss appeal based upon the failure of appellant Cotton to serve a true and correct copy of his notice of appeal on appellee as required by Rule 73(a), W.R. C.P., and the court having reviewed not only said motion and the affidavit in support thereof but the entire file, including the brief filed by appellant, and it appearing that appellant did not serve a notice of appeal as required by Rule 73(a), supra; and an examination of the brief tendered by appellant reveals a failure to comply with Rule 12(b)(4), Rules of the Supreme Court, by his failure to make any reference to any record pages upon which he alleges there appears evidence which would create a conflict of material fact; nor can we say that we find a succinct statement of the *1344argument upon which appellant relies for reversal, *Texas Gulf Sulphur Company v. Robles,*Wyo., 511 P.2d 963, 967; and although the merits of an appeal are not usually to be considered on a motion to dismiss, *Enos*v. *Keating,*36 Wyo. 318, 255 P. 1; *Security First National Bank of Los Angeles v. King,*45 Wyo. 93, 15 P.2d 1112, it is clear from even the most cursory reading of the facts herein that there is a total lack of legal basis for appellant’s appeal. Municipal judges, such as appellee Hand, as with all other judges, are clothed in the mantle of judicial immunity, and cannot be found liable for any action taken while acting, as here, in a judicial capacity, *Linde v. Bentley,*Wyo., 482 P.2d 121; *Pierson*v. *Ray,*386 U.S. 547, 87 S.Ct. 1213, 18 L.Ed.2d 288; *Imbler v. Pachtman,*424 U.S. 409, 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128. Even if Rule 73(a), W.R.C.P., had been complied with, we would have no choice but to affirm the trial court’s granting of summary judgment.

The court further finds there is no reasonable cause for this appeal and that there should be taxed as part of the costs in the case a reasonable fee in the sum of $50 to the counsel of appellee, along with any and all other costs, Rule 72(k), W.R.C.P.; *Keller v. Anderson,*Wyo., 554 P.2d 1253.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that ap-pellee’s motion for dismissal of the appeal be and the same is granted and that the appeal be dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of said court shall tax the sum of $50 as a fee for appellee’s counsel and all other proper costs as provided by law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME, AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW AND IS QUILIFIED
IN ITS INTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             783
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      415
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1028
<PP&E>                                           56608
<DEPRECIATION>                                    8641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   51528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1650
<BONDS>                                          34828
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          6759
<OTHER-SE>                                        2109
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     51528
<SALES>                                           9076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  9364
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   571
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    859
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                859
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       859
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Paul C. McDonnel, Chief Financial Officer of Arrowhead Research
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 11, 2008



/S/    PAUL C.
MCDONNELPaul C. McDonnelChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)


A signed original of these written statements required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to Arrowhead Research Corporation and will be retained by Arrowhead Research Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.