alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1413 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

114)11-1-74 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Primed 7/10/2008 8:40:32 AM Sheet 114 of 114 
NEWS A-94-52 77 P.2 

.11-7^ 

OWENS CORNING PLANS TO SELL SHARE IN AOC 

I

nternational glass supplier Owens 

Coming (Toledo. Ohio) has announced 

plans to sell Its 50 percent interest ln 

resin supplier Alpha/Owens Coming 

(Collierville. Tenn.) for an undisclosed 

price. The companies teamed up in 1994 

in a Joint venture combining Alpha's 

open-mold resins with Owens Coming's 

closed-mold resins. 

"Our original intent was to divest ourselves from the rcsin business," says BUI 

Hamilton, media relations director for 

Owens Coming. "We felt the resin industry was consolidating, and we would be 

in a better position if we joined forces 

with another strong supplier. This would 

give us a more complete product offering* a stronger presence in the marketplace and an enterprise of greater value. 

The second step was to get out of the 

rcsin business while we were strong." 

The move to sell its share ln AOC was 

also prompted by the debt load Owens 

Corning incurred with the acquisitions 

of two large building products manufacturers, part of 17 acquisitions tn the last 

three years. With 22.000 employees ln 

more than 30 countries. Owens Coming 

boasts $4 billion in worldwide sales of 

its glass fiber and building materials. 

AOC reports $300 million ln annual 

sales and employs nearly 500 people, 

with five manufacturing locations tn the 

United States and Canada and a joint 

venture in Mexico. Polyester and vinyl 

ester resins manufactured by 

Alpha/Owens Coming arc used in automotive body parts, recreational boats. 

Infrastructure applications, and tub and 

shower enclosures. 

The venture successfully combines 

the strengths of the two partners and 

has realized significant synergies In 

material purchasing, facility management and operating expense reduction." 

Glen Hiner. Owens Coming chairandCEO. 

MERGERS & ACQUISITION! 

Cambridge Industries acquires 

Livingston Molded Products 

Cambridge Industries (Madison Heights. 

Mich.), fabricator of composite automotive 

and commercial truck parts, has acquired 

Livingston Molded Products Inc. (Auburn. 

Wash.), manufacturer of exterior body 

panels for heavy trucks. Livingston represents about $10 million in annual sales, 

compared with Cambridge's $500 million 

per year, and the acquisition gives Cambridge a manufacturing and assembly 

operation located near heavy truck customers on the West Coast 

The Livingston operation expands 

Cambridge's existing RTM. hand lay-up. 

SMC. injection molding and SRIM capabilities. "We expect to reap both logistical 

and value-added benefits from this 

acquisition, especially lower production 

and assembly costs, and shipping 

advantages." says Kevin Alder. Cambridge president 

Circle 104 on the reader service card Ss* ua at JEC Booth *C14 and D12. Alblnont Hall 

cCorp. 

Plastic Sales Inc. 

Interplastic Corp. (St. Paul. Minn.), one 

10 COMPOSITES TECHNOLOGY MARCH/APRIL 1998
WILLIE FLOYD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0897

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 22, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jan Shackelford, Judge.

Willie Floyd, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
:’ 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

raid taxe8. The Tax Oolleotor refuae8 to aooept the 

m.mey ror 8aid tare8 and tells $hem he oamot leg&my 

aooept 8am or 188~ a reoeipt before Ootober 1, 19l&. 

The s&d ptitlee are very lnsisknt ~JX¶ therefore we would 

apprsoiate a ruling from your Department on the following 

qU~8tiOLl8: 
Honorable Qttb P. Wore, page 2 

"1. can a duly eleoted and qualified Oocmty 

*x Oolleotor legally aoobpt Or Oolleot taxes On 

property @de year in advame of the Oumxnt year 

and beiore the Property ha8 be+ aasesaed for maid 

year and before the roll8 have been mde up ror 

the said year0 

oould 

“& If FOoUr tUWW43 18 hl th@ atfirllEltiV4, 

the Cowty Tax C$l$e$EOr lesue a valid tax 

reeelpt for the ~4 

.I 

Your requeet fO3 u) Opinion 18 aooomm& 

bye a brief writtea by, you, Which ha8 been Wit4 helpful to u 

ant3 ‘we thank ‘you iOr it. 

%l an8w8r to JrOUr fir8t qUWItiC?‘n, 10 obmne 

. 

While it 18 the rUIiOtiOII and duty ot the ax 

oo~l.eotor to oofleo~t taxe8, he ha8 no kmful authority to ooe 

proPJ8e eud.106 for tcuee, or ~give.a di8oount ror payment 0r 

taxes.biiOre the due date thereof, or* in truth, to oolleot 

t,axe~ la any way OF manner 03'at any time not authorized by 

the law OS Texas. 

. . 

rn order for any papment W a taxwvar to tb 

tax oolleotor to be a legal PWmWt Of 

that the payment be made in OUIT811OY* 

taxO8, it 18 nece8paz-y 

5 Tex, W8 

See Bryan V’. Stiberg, 

5s Tel. 36 t 

A~tin.V.'T~x; 1 8. Vf* (26 

)I 

601, and NV18 V. w, 

the eald oolldobor, at the time 0r the paynlsnt t0 

h by the -per, must be. either a valid inoumbent or the 

orrioe OS mx OoUeotor, or 8 de raeto holder the-r, Cia ma 

'I, sintt~n I, s. D., 234 8. W. 1090~ SOhdber V* Qmmnon, 31 

s. w. (a) 659); the property On whioh the tax paid iam have 

been p~+vioutily. entered OII tkm tax r0l.b towher with it8 ~tim 

(8~ Oeolge v. Dean, 47 Tex. 73) and the a86488ing roll8 most 

bm,bea reoaived by the TAX 00 1 lOotOr fma the ~~Seione~~ 

00-t b the 0880 of a re8ident~taxmyer, Or from the CO5Ptroller 

of publie Aoooun$s~ in the ease-of's non-reaideut taxpayer, (i?ee 

~exa8 c R. 0. R. Co., vw State, 73Civ- APPo 580; OraDcie County 

TV. Texas &ET. 01 R+ COSS 35 al+. App. 361, error refused; men 

v. Courtney, 24 'Xv. ARP* 86). 

The earliest day On wbioh roll8 Oan 'ie deliver& 

i. i

h the mneotor isr the first day Or Ootober. (See 0-e County 

i,. f. Texae d: N. 0. R. CO., 35 DIVE APR. 361, error raruaed). 

I~, '- 
Honorable Otto P. Z&ore, page 3 

FIRST ASSISTANT 

ATTORKEY GENERAL 

The tar oolleotor ha8 no authority to Oolleot taxes for.the ourren8 year before the firat day of 

Ootober* (Stae Orange County V. Tern8 ds R. 0. R..Co., 35 01~. 

App. 361, error refused). 

&I 80 aumh a8 the f+rpeyer is not authorized 

to pay, OP the tasoolleotor authorimeb to oollsot, taxes bsfore the roll8 are legally delivered to the tax oolleotor, it 

is,,therefoti, plafnly apparent that the tax oolleotor is uithout authority to now oolleoti the tare8 for the year 1944 Inqulred about by you.& 

Ogz amwer to the ilmt question auked by 

you renders it unaeoeesary to answer the other question.
Exhibit 32.1

LASERSIGHT INCORPORATED

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of LaserSight Incorporated (the Company) does hereby certify that:

| | 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the   Company for quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies   with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | 2. The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.                                                                                                   

|Dated: November 14, 2006 | /s/ Danghui (David) Liu
|------------------------ | -------------------------
|                         |                          
|                         | Danghui (David) Liu    
|                         | Chief   Executive Officer

The certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 1350, has been provided to LaserSight Incorporated and will be retained LaserSight Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1543 

To require the procurement of iron and steel products from American sources, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2019 

Mr. STAUBER (for himself, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. 

GUEST, Mr. GONZALEZ of Ohio, Mr. DUFFY, Mr. FORTENBERRY, and 

Mr. BOST) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To require the procurement of iron and steel products from 

American sources, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Workers for 

5 Security Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO BUY STEEL FROM AMERICAN 

7 SOURCES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—No funds appropriated or other9 wise available may be used by a head of an entity of the 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1543 IH

1 Federal Government for the procurement of a steel or iron 

2 product for the purpose of building a physical barrier 

3 along the land border with Mexico if the steel or iron prod4 uct is not produced in the United States unless the head 

5 of the entity concerned determines that— 

6 (1) the procurement of such a steel or iron 

7 product produced in the United States— 

8 (A) is inconsistent with a public interest or 

9 defense interest; or 

10 (B) would increase the cost of building a 

11 physical barrier along the land border with 

12 Mexico by more than 25 percent; or 

13 (2) no such steel or iron product produced in 

14 the United States is available. 

15 (b) PRODUCED IN THE UNITED STATES.—For the 

16 purposes of subsection (a), a steel or iron product shall 

17 be considered produced in the United States if the manu18 facturing of that product, from the initial melting stage 

19 through the application of coatings, occurred wholly in the 

20 United States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
February 13, 2004

24405

#### Defeo v. State

Affirmed
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth D. Walter,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


                                                /s/ Kenneth D. Walter
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Chief Financial Officer


March 31, 2003
December 31, 1997

19796

#### State v. Dicks

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDTED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,
AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,062,418
<SECURITIES>                                13,264,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,565,632
<PP&E>                                         142,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,707,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          760,449
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    36,710,743
<OTHER-SE>                                (20,745,310)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,707,635
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               241,521
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,427,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               541,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,727,696)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,727,696)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,727,696)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 13210 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:15

- cr - 00227

- GAP

- GJK

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JAMES CARL DORON WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the Unite d States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ ( April 19, 2017 ) Before HULL , WILSON and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Aaron Baghdadi , appointed counsel for James Williams in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

Case: 16-13210 Date Filed: 04/19/2017 Page: 1 of 22 appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Williams ’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED

. Because we have concluded that no arguable issues of merit exist, Williams ’s motions for appointment of new counsel and relief under Fed. R. App. P. 31 are DENIED as
moot. Case: 16-13210 Date Filed: 04/19/2017 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 10.2



                                       51
<PAGE>


                        TERMINATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT


Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc. ("Lessee") leased Unit T-2020 at the 422
Business Center (the "Premises"), under a Lease Agreement dated October 9, 1991
(the "Lease Agreement"), from Tioga Leasing Corporation, succeeded by Suburban
Management Co., Inc. ("Lessor") . Lessee vacated the Premises on November 22,
1996 so as to allow Lessor to let the space to the U.S. Post Office.

In consideration of the following promises, Lessor and Lessee hereby agree as
follows:

1.    Lessee shall pay to Lessee its security deposit of $5,000 plus
      interest, as provided in Section 29 of the Lease Agreement. Lessor
      shall make such payment to Lessee upon the mutual execution of this
      Termination and Release Agreement, without claims or offsets.

2.    Lessee shall pay, upon the mutual execution of this Termination and
      Release Agreement, rent in the amount of $13,310, and shall waive any
      claim for refund of rent paid for the portion of November 1996 during
      which Lessee had vacated the Premises.

3.    The Lease Agreement shall be deemed terminated by mutual agreement
      effective December 31, 1996.

4.    Subject to the foregoing provisions of this Termination and Release
      Agreement, Lessor and Lessee do hereby release and forever discharge
      each other, their heirs, executors, administrators, agents,
      shareholders, directors, officers, employees, subsidiaries and
      affiliates, from any and all claims, demands, costs, expenses, losses
      or liabilities arising from the Lease Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee, intending to be legally bound hereby,
have hereunder set their hand this the day of January 1997.

Lessee                                     Lessor
SURGICAL LASER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.          SUBURBAN MANAGEMENT CO. INC.

By:     /s/ Michael R. Stewart             By:   /s/ Gene Call, Vice President
       -------------------------------        ---------------------------------
            Michael R. Stewart,                      Gene Call, Vice President
             Vice President                
Attest:                                    Attest:

By:     /s/ Davis Woodward                 By:
       -------------------------------        ---------------------------------
            Davis Woodward, Secretary


                                       52
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 20, 2005 of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



| |  |                                                            |  | 
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ S. Patric Plumley                                      |  | 
| |  | S. Patric Plumley Chief Financial Officer October 24, 2005 |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



26
27599

#### State v. Souza

Affirmed
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

      ( print page 85336)    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 7, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 116 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-73, CP2024-75.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-26814 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P