alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-1565

___________ Shirl D. Driver, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Michael Groose; Allen Luebbers; * Eastern District of Missouri. Nancy Belt; Cyndi Prudden; Robert * Capowski, * [PUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 7, 2001 Filed: December 13, 2001

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Shirl D. Driver, a Missouri inmate, alleged that prison officials violated her first- amendment, due-process, and equal-protection rights when they censored a music- cassette tape she had ordered through the mail, purportedly because the tape was determined to be a security risk under the prison’s mail policy. The District1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2- Court 1 granted summary judgment for defendants and denied Driver’s post-judgment motion. Driver appeals. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree that summary judgment was proper, essentially for the reasons stated by the District Court. SeeLiebe v. Norton , 157 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir. 1998) (de novo review). Concerning Driver's equal-protection claim, though her pleadings show that she is a member of a protected class, to avoid summary judgment it was incumbent upon her to come forward with evidence that would create a triable issue of fact as to whether she had been treated differently from similarly situated white inmates, and this she failed to do. In particular, her evidence does not show that any white inmates were allowed to receive through the mail, uncensored, the same explicit-lyric tape that she had ordered. There being no error in the District Court's grant of summary judgment,we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying Driver’s postjudgment motion. See Sanders v. Clemco Indus. , 862 F.2d 161, 169 (8th Cir. 1988) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Migratory Bird Depredation Permit

Process

Last Modified: 

Print

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issues Federal Migratory Bird Depredation Permits

to individuals and entities for lethal take of Migratory Birds when conditions warrant.

This take can include any migratory birds except for eagles and threatened and

endangered species. These permits designate the species, methods, and the

number of birds that may be taken, and are only valid for the individuals named on

the permits, permit locations, and dates of the permit.

Applicants who apply for a Migratory Bird Depredation Permit must apply to the U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service Regional Office. The application process involves the

following steps:

Step 1. Contact USDA Wildlife Services for technical assistance.

Step 2. If a permit is justified, a USDA biologist will issue a WS Form 37 to the

requestor.

Step 3. The requestor must submit a permit application to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service including the form 37 and a permit application fee.
WS Form 37 and USDA’s Role in the Permit

Process

Although the USDA Wildlife Services Program is not a regulatory program, we have a

role in some regulatory processes. Wildlife Services biologists conduct damage

evaluations to provide information to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the state

wildlife agency as part of their permit processes. WS provides technical assistance to

callers with migratory bird conflicts. In some cases, lethal take may be required to

resolve these issues or reinforce the effectiveness of non-lethal dispersal. In such

cases, WS biologists complete an evaluation form (Form 37) that describes the

incident and documents our recommendations for management options. When lethal

take is recommended, those forms are forwarded by the applicant with applications

and application fee for Federal Migratory Bird Depredation Permits.

Migratory Bird Depredation Permit Application

More about FWS permits and the Federal laws and Treaties that relate to migratory

birds
#### Rivera v. Rivera

27464

09/19/2006

Vacated, remanded & affirmed
H. Res. 2 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 6, 2015. 

Resolved, That the Senate be informed that a quorum of 

the House of Representatives has assembled; that John A. 

Boehner, a Representative from the State of Ohio, has been 

elected Speaker; and that Karen L. Haas, a citizen of the 

State of Maryland, has been elected Clerk of the House of 

Representatives of the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 6, 2014

NO. 03-11-00428-CR

Dromico Andree Washington a/k/a Andrew Washington a/k/a

Dromico Andrew Washington, Sr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED ON REMAND-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is 

made.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 289 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that gun violence 

is a public health issue and Congress should enact by the end of the 

114th Congress comprehensive Federal legislation that protects the Second Amendment and keeps communities safe and healthy, including 

expanding enforceable background checks for all commercial gun sales, 

improving the mental health system in the United States, and making 

gun trafficking and straw purchasing a Federal crime. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2015 

Mr. LOWENTHAL (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. ESTY, and 

Mrs. CAPPS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

gun violence is a public health issue and Congress should 

enact by the end of the 114th Congress comprehensive 

Federal legislation that protects the Second Amendment 

and keeps communities safe and healthy, including expanding enforceable background checks for all commercial gun sales, improving the mental health system in 

the United States, and making gun trafficking and straw 

purchasing a Federal crime. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 289 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) gun violence is a public health issue; and 

4 (2) Congress should enact by the end of the 

5 114th Congress comprehensive Federal legislation 

6 that protects the Second Amendment and keeps 

7 communities safe and healthy, including expanding 

8 enforceable background checks for all commercial 

9 gun sales, improving the mental health system in the 

10 United States, and making gun trafficking and 

11 straw purchasing a Federal crime. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Platt, Appellant, *v.*Penetryn System, Inc., Appellee.

(No. 31679

Decided March 2, 1949.)

*Mr. Karl J. Ertle,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Rowell, Roberts & Stapleton,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

.Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taet, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 11 a
                                
                      ARGUSS HOLDINGS, INC.
      STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



                                             Six Months Ended
                                         June 30,       June 30,
                                             1997           1996
                                                                 
NET INCOME (LOSS)                      $1,392,000      $(261,000)
                                                                 
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE                                       
                                                                 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES                                   
OUTSTANDING                             7,275,000       1,700,000
                                                                 
STOCK OPTIONS                             243,000               -
                                                           
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                        7,518,000       1,700,000
                                                                 
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE              $    .19        $  (.15)
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                         Three Months Ended
                                                                 
                                    June 30, 1997   June 30, 1996
                                                                 
NET INCOME (LOSS)                                                
                                         $774,000      $(320,000)
                                                                 
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE                                       
                                                                 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES                                   
OUTSTANDING                             7,279,000       1,700,000
                                                                 
STOCK OPTIONS                             262,000               -
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                        7,541,000       1,700,000
                                                                 
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE              $    .10        $  (.19)
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Organization

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS is made up of 6 programs, 5 management support units, and 1 office that

supports government-wide initiatives. We have more than 8,000 employees

stationed in 50 States, 4 Territories, and 35 countries.

View APHIS Organizational Chart

Operational Program Units

Animal Care 

Determines and promotes standards of humane care and treatment of animals

through inspections and educational efforts.

Learn More
Biotechnology Regulatory Services 

Protects agricultural and natural resources by ensuring safe development of

genetically engineered organisms using a science-based regulatory framework.

Learn More

International Services 
Provides international animal and plant health expertise to safeguard American

agricultural health and promote U.S. agricultural trade.

Learn More

Plant Protection and Quarantine 

Safeguards agriculture and natural resources from risks associated with the entry,

establishment, or spread of pests and noxious weeds.

Learn More
Veterinary Services 

Protects and improves the health, quality, and marketability of our nation's animals,

animal products, and veterinary biologics by preventing, controlling, and/or

eliminating animal diseases, and monitoring, and promoting animal health and

productivity.

Learn More
Wildlife Services 

Provides leadership to resolve wildlife conflicts and create a balance allowing people

and wildlife to peacefully coexist.

Learn More
Management Support Units

Emergency and Regulatory Compliance Services (ERCS) 

Provides leadership on all issues related to emergency preparedness and response,

regulatory investigative and enforcement activities, safety initiatives, and the

regulation of agricultural select agents.

Legislative and Public Affairs 

Manages communications with Congress, States, Tribes, industry stakeholders,

trading partners and the media.

Marketing and Regulatory Business Services 

Provides resource management and administrative services to APHIS and USDA’s

Agricultural Marketing Service.

Policy and Program Development 

Provides rigorous policy analysis and budgetary and regulatory development for

APHIS that is consistent with the Agency's environmental stewardship goals and

legal authorities. Also conducts critical programmatic evaluations and reviews to

ensure programs are operating efficiently and effectively.

Offices

Office of Civil Rights, Diversity, and Inclusion

Our Office of Civil Rights, Diversity, and Inclusion provides leadership, direction, and

technical support to all employees and external service recipients on Civil Rights

matters.

Office of the National Tribal Liaison

Our Office of the National Tribal Liaison serves as a single point of contact for Tribal

issues and works to ensure that relevant programs and policies are efficient, easy to

understand, accessible, and developed in consultation with the Native American
Tribes they impact.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Benton and Bray 

Argued at Richmond, Virginia 

CARLTON A. VAUGHAN, III 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 1596-96-2 JUDGE RICHARD S. BRAY 

 JANUARY 20, 1998 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HANOVER COUNTY 

Richard H.C. Taylor, Judge 

 L. Willis Robertson, Jr. (Cosby and 

Robertson, on brief), for appellant. 

 Monica S. McElyea, Assistant Attorney General 

(James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on 

 brief), for appellee. 

 Carlton A. Vaughan, III, (defendant) appeals his conviction 

for several burglaries and related grand larcenies, arguing that 

the prosecutions violated Code § 19.2-243, the "speedy trial" 

statute. We agree and reverse the convictions. 

 Defendant is familiar with the salient procedural history, 

and we recite only those circumstances necessary to a disposition 

of this appeal. 

 Defendant and codefendants, John Bradley Madison and Gerald 

E. Baker, Jr., were prosecuted before the trial court for several 

burglaries and attendant offenses. Each defendant was 

represented by separate counsel, but the respective prosecutions 

shared identical procedural courses, together with like motions, 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

arguments, orders and other events pertaining to the speedy trial 

issue. Accordingly, each defendant appealed his convictions to 

this Court, asserting that Code § 19.2-243 barred the disputed 

prosecutions and convictions. 

 In Baker v. Commonwealth, a panel of this Court concluded 

that the Commonwealth had "fail[ed] to provide [codefendant 

Baker] a speedy trial as required by Code § 19.2-243" and 

reversed the convictions. 25 Va. App. 19, 20-21, 486 S.E.2d 111, 

112, aff'd en banc, 26 Va. App. 175, 493 S.E.2d ____ (1997). 

 Finding that Baker controls the disposition of this appeal, 

we similarly reverse and dismiss the instant convictions. 

 Reversed and dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 254 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 254

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 12, 2015.
    Resolved, That the House has learned with profound sorrow of the death of 
the Honorable James Claude Wright, Jr., former Member of the House for 18 terms 
and Speaker of the House of Representatives for the One Hundredth and One 
Hundred First Congresses.
    Resolved, That in the death of the Honorable James Claude Wright, Jr., the 
United States and the State of Texas have lost a valued and eminent public 
servant and citizen.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the Senate and 
transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 99.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Director, Principal and Principal Executive Officer of C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.



|                  | Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.
|----------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|Date:             |                                        
|Novmeber 20, 2002 | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |
Transport Transports 

Canada Canada

 TP 7245E

 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your name. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian 

Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X. Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H, the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. 

Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard. 

This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. 

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communications Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8, or 1-800-305-2059, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp 

24-0022 (01-2005)

1/1 No.

CF-2014-09

Issue Date 

 12 February 2014 

Number: CF-2014-09 

Subject: Engine High Pressure Fuel Line Fretting 

Effective: 26 February 2014 

Applicability: Pratt & Whitney Canada (P&WC) model PW150A engines, serial number 

PCE-FA0916 and earlier. 

Compliance: As indicated below, unless already accomplished. 

Background: There have been reports of damage in excess of acceptable criteria to the high pressure 

fuel line from the P&WC PW150A engine flowmeter to the flow divider. Damage has 

included fretting wear through contact with the engine igniter cables. The contact is the 

result of incorrectly routed igniter cables. While there has been no report of associated

fuel leakage, the fretting wear, if undetected, could progress to a point where high 

pressure fuel would leak into the engine nacelle. 

P&WC has issued Service Bulletin (SB) 35274 to re-route the igniter cables with new 

support brackets and clamping points to prevent chafing between the igniter cables and 

their surrounding components. 

This AD mandates the incorporation of SB 35274. 

Corrective 

Actions: 

Within 36 months or when the engine is disassembled and access is available to the 

necessary subassembly, whichever occurs first, from the effective date of this AD, 

incorporate P&WC SB 35274, Revision No.1, dated 3 May 2012, or later revisions 

approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada. 

Compliance with the original issue of P&WC SB 35274 prior to the effective date of 

this AD, meets the requirement of this AD. 

Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

Philip Tang 

Acting Chief, Continuing Airworthiness 

Contact: Robin Lau, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 

613-996-9178 or e-mail AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
H. Res. 129 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 27, 2015. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the joint resolution 

(H.J. Res. 35) making further continuing appropriations for 

fiscal year 2015, and for other purposes. All points of order 

against consideration of the joint resolution are waived. The 

joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and 

(2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.