alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### David HINKLE, Appellant, v. The CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, Appellee.

No. M-76-109.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 25, 1977.

Robert A. Jackson, Oklahoma City, Daniel K. Zorn, Legal Intern, for appellant.

Walter M. Powell, Municipal Counselor, Curtis L. Smith, Asst. Municipal Counselor, Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BLISS, Judge.

Appellant, David Hinkle, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was convicted by the Oklahoma City Municipal Court, a court not of record, for the offense of Disorderly Conduct, pursuant to the Oklahoma City Ordinances, Section 21-94, and sentenced to a fine of Thirty-five ($35.00) Dollars. The defendant appealed this conviction to the District Court, Oklahoma County, Case No. CA-75-284, pursuant to 11 O.S.1971, § 958.-14, wherein a trial de novo was held, jury being waived. The District Court found the defendant guilty as charged and sentenced defendant to pay a fine of Thirty-five ($35.00) Dollars. The defendant now appeals to this Court requesting that the judgment and sentence of the District Court, affirming his conviction be reversed with instructions to dismiss.

We need only point out to the defendant the case *Scheidt v. Rakestraw,*Okl.Cr., 548 P.2d 677 (1976), wherein this Court constructed 11 O.S.1971, § 958.14. In that case, this Court held that when a defendant appeals a conviction from a Municipal Court not of record to the District Court, and a trial de novo is then held, such an appeal is final, and that the Court of Criminal Appeals exercises no appellate jurisdiction over the District Court in such proceedings. Accordingly, the defendant’s appeal in the instant case is *DISMISSED.*

BRETT, P. J., and BUSSEY, J. concur.
#### Doe, In re: John (DOB 4/16/91)

16659

9/11/96

Affirmed
25957, 25958, 25959, 25960

#### Doe, In re; Doe Children, In re

Affirmed
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centennial
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended February 29, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officer's knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: April 14, 2004

By: /s/ Michael J. Small
    -----------------------
Name:  Michael J. Small
Title: Chief Executive Officer and Director

                                       42
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000853566
<NAME> BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,633,488
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,633,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,356,474)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,313,561)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Avian Disease

Last Modified: 

Print

We keep a close eye on avian diseases, preventing and controlling their impact on

our Nation's birds, people, environment, and economy.

Avian Influenza 

Avian influenza, or bird flu, is a viral disease with two main types: highly pathogenic

avian influenza and low pathogenicity avian influenza.
Virulent Newcastle Disease 

Virulent Newcastle disease, formerly known as exotic Newcastle disease, is a

contagious and fatal viral disease of birds and poultry.

Disease Prevention and Management Programs

National Animal Health Monitoring System Poultry Studies

National Poultry Improvement Plan

Defend the Flock
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0618

 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM171AD

A300-57-6029, R07 --- 6/6/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008