alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Justinian I, Relief Portrait
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Gaetano Cecere

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1950

Location
      
House Chamber

Justinian I (c. 483-565) Byzantine emperor. Appointed Tribonian to compile and consolidate the Roman legal code into the Justinian Code, which he supplemented with a collection of rulings and precedents.

The 23 marble relief portraits over the gallery doors of the House Chamber in the U.S. Capitol depict historical figures noted for their work in establishing the principles that underlie American law. They were installed when the chamber was remodeled in 1949-1950. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Jeremiah W Oay) Nixon, Governor
. Sara P arker Pauley, Director 

# T OF NATURAL RESOURCES

www.dnr.mo.gov 

### MAY 2 2 2015
Mr. Mark J. Hague Acting Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region VII 11201 Renner Boulevard Lenexa, KS 66219 

### Re: Requestfor a I-year extension ofthe 2008 8-hour Ozone National AmbientAir Quality Standard (NAAQS) attainment deadline for the St. Louis ozone nonattainment area. Dear Mr. Hague: Pursuant to Section 181(a)(5) ofthe Clean Air Act (CAA) and the corresponding regulation at 40 CFR 51.1107(a), the Missouri Department ofNatural Resources' AirPollution Control Program (Air Program) hereby requests a I-year attainment date extension to July 20,2016 for the St. Louis marginal nonattainment areaunder the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Under these provisions, EPA may grant up to two I-year extensions iftwo criteria are met. Therefore we also attest in this letter, that the State has satisfied these requirements for the St. Louis ozone nonattainment area: 1. The State ofMissouri has complied with all requirements pertaining to the area inthe applicable ozone implementationplan

­
• On February 20, 2015, EPA approved the 81. Louis area's ozone maintenance plan, and redesignated the areato attainment, for the 1997 ozone standard [80 FR 9207];
• The AirProgram submitted to EPA a marginal areaplan for the St. Louis nonattainment area on September4, 2014 to address obligations under the 2008 ozone standard. This plan is now deemed to be complete by operation oflaw; and 2. No monitor operated by the State ofMissouri in the St. Louis arearecorded a 4th-highest daily 8-hour ozone air quality value at or above the level ofthe 2008 NAAQS (0.075 ppm) during the 2014 ozone season. On May 1,2015,the Air Program sentEPA a letter certifying that our ozone air quality data in the Air Quality System is complete, qualityassured ambient air quality monitoring data for the 2014 attainment year ozone season.


## o Recycled PaperMr. 

### Mark J. Hague Page Two
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Ifyou have any questions regarding this request, please contactMs. Wendy Vit, the Air Program's Planning Section Chief, at P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 orby telephone at (573) 751-4817. Sincerely,

# Ag:U:Np~ Kyra L. Moore Director KLM:jwc
May 21,2003

24958

#### Male Child, In re Adoption of v. Roe

Affirmed
40 P.3d 945

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

October 30, 2001

23598

#### State v. Temple

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 99.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Sr. Vice President of C&M Management Inc. and Director of Accounting of Boston Capital Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.



|                | Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.
|--------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                |                                        
|                | By:                                    
|                |                                        
|                |                                        
|                | By:                                    
|                |                                        
|                |                                        
|                | By:                                    
|                |                                        
|                |                                        
|Date:           |                                        
|August 20, 2002 | By:                                    
|                |                                        
|                |                                        
|                |                                        
|                |                                        
|                |
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

Honorable C, ii, County Attorney Kotley county Ilatador, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-7349 Ro: "L

*TheTax Colleator like to appbint
ge of her duties

Collector, enter of office as Tax office of County Treastion involves the construction of Article ich, with certain exceptions not here
Wo person shall hold or exeraiee, at the ~me tixie, morethan on0 civil office of emOlUnent

. . . .*577’ .

Honorable 0. W. Horrid, Page 2

In the case of Kirnbroughv, Barnett, 93Tex. 310, 5i S. Wr122, ous Su~relae Court saidr

Vuiilic office is the right, authority, and duty created and conferred by law by%iiich, for a given perioci @ither fixed by law or enduring at the pleasure of the creating powm, an individual is invested with eoraeportion of the sovereign functions of the $overnment to b:>exercised by hirJ for the bonefit OPthe public.* There aan be AQqiwstioil that the position of County Treasurer is a aivir offietn of molument. Section l+,J+ of Article XVX of th* Coribt~tutlon provides for such office in titlefollowirl& terra6I

*TheLe islature &hall prescribe the duties and provldo 8

of the OleUtiOA3 the qualified voters of each county in this tate, of a county treasurer 6.. , . whoshall have an office at the oountp seat, andhold their off&es-for twoyears, anduntil theirs suacesaors are qualified crudshall have sueh compensation as nay be provideAby la~.~ The Legislature prescribed ths~dutiea of such office in Title 36, R.C$3,

It Is nettled that deputy sheriffs and deputy count alarks are public offioers of this State. Dongeav. Beall; Y s. W. 2d 5311 SttiteV. Brooks, 42 Tex. 62i Towneav. Harris, 13 Tex, 5071 f:urray v. State, 678, Vi, 2d 274. Tkis office has P reviouely held iA Opinion No+O-4963 that a deputy constable ikewise Is a public officer of th%State. Bya parity of reaeoning and after consideration of Article 7252, the ArtW.e under which $e@y asaeseofa andaolleators are a?riointed we,feel that a deputy assessor and collector Is also a public officer, and that he holds a civil. office of eazolumentunder this State. Article 7252 providea, in part:

Y!Zaoh Asreasor andColbator of Taxes mayappoint one or nore deputies to amSet hail in theaeseement Andy collection of taxes, and nay rquire such bond fron the person m a.::xdnted, aa he deem neatmary for hia fndemityj and the Asse.saorand Collector of Taxes ahall. in all cases be liable end accountable for the proceedinv aadmisgonduct in office of hle’,~deputiee~ an8the deputies appoint6d in aooordance tith the orovisions of this Art;iclr shall do and perfow al.1 the duties imposed and fo.- qpired by law of Amessors andCol.lect.xs .of ‘i&m j and all rots of maohdeputiee done in confomlty with law rhall, be ae binding andvalid as if tine by the A&W&MIT ami Colleator of Tmceain pereonr , . .” Zt hollow that the County Treasurer my not elao eerve ae (LDeputy Tax Collector. Your6very truly

I
##### 



Exhibit 32.3
  SECTION 1350
    CERTIFICATION OF
    CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
    (required by Section 906 of the
    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  Form 10-K Form 10-K),
  (1)
    The
    Form 10-K
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
    or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the
    Form 10-K
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date:
    February 29, 2008
#### STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Joseph L. EK, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 13226.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Sept. 9, 1974.

David H. Day, Jay V. Barney, Murray, for defendant and appellant.

Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., Earl F. Dorius, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

ELLETT, Justice:

The defendant appeals from a conviction of robbery and makes the following assignments of error:

1. The trial court denied a defense motion to suppress which was based on a claim that the method of identifying the defendant was improper.

2. The trial court refused to permit a witness who had testified to act as interpreter for a deaf-mute witness called to the stand.

The victim of the robbery was shown a picture of the defendant and then permitted to view him in a hospital, where the victim recognized defendant as being one of the robbers. At the time, no charge had been filed against the defendant, and the officers were merely attempting to ascertain who committed the crime. There was nothing improper about the method used to secure the identification, and the trial court properly refused to suppress the evidence.

The defendant called three witnesses who testified to his alibi and then called a deaf mute as a fourth alibi witness. The daughter of the deaf mute had already testified and was called as an interpreter for her mother. Counsel for the State objected on the ground that there was an exclusion rule in effect and the daughter would not be a proper person to act as interpreter. Counsel for defendant, in making a proffer of proof, stated that the testimony would be cumulative. The court sustained the objection and explained his ruling as follows:

> I will explain to you, because I think you are entitled to have an explanation as to why I am sustaining Mr. Gammon’s objection. The interpreter has testified to the same events. I would not wish to place a strain on your proposed interpreter’s willingness to interpret, particularly on cross-examination, correctly an answer which would conflict with the *360person who is serving as interpreter’s own testimony.

In view of the fact that the court upon proper request had ordered witnesses to be excluded while other witnesses were testifying and further that the proffered interpreter had already testified in the matter, we do not think the trial court abused his discretion in refusing to permit the daughter to act as an interpreter. No other interpreter was called in lieu of the daughter, and no request was made for a continuance to secure another. Even if there was error (which we do not think there was), it was harmless, since three witnesses had already testified to the alibi of the defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.

CALLISTER, C. J., and HENRIOD, CROCKETT and TUCKETT, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

               <ARTICLE>                                                       5
                      
               <S>                                                           <C>
               <PERIOD-TYPE>                                               9-MOS
               <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1998
               <PERIOD-END>                                          SEP-30-1998
               <CASH>                                                  9,272,460
               <SECURITIES>                                                    0
               <RECEIVABLES>                                          15,735,721
               <ALLOWANCES>                                            2,121,242
               <INVENTORY>                                             7,222,769
               <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       27,557,489
               <PP&E>                                                  2,887,785
               <DEPRECIATION>                                          1,390,469
               <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         49,597,164
               <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   7,687,959
               <BONDS>                                                         0
               <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0 
               <PREFERRED>                                                 4,000
               <COMMON>                                                   13,313
               <OTHER-SE>                                             39,626,215
               <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           49,597,164
               <SALES>                                                13,947,836
               <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       14,452,813
               <CGS>                                                   4,334,274
               <TOTAL-COSTS>                                           4,556,464
               <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       15,253,136
               <LOSS-PROVISION>                                          368,772
               <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        721,813
               <INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (5,632,097)
               <INCOME-TAX>                                              232,213
               <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (5,864,310)
               <DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
               <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
               <CHANGES>                                                       0
               <NET-INCOME>                                          (5,864,310)
               <EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (0.79)
               <EPS-DILUTED>                                              (0.79)
                       
               
</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 11 , 2015 

# Order

Clerk August 11 , 2015

149372 (12 8 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 149372

v COA: 279161

Kent CC: 06

- 003485

- FC

DENNIS LEE TOMASIK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time

for filing its brief on appeal is GRANTED. The brief will be accepted as timely filed if

submitted on or before September 15, 2015.
# C_2016202EN.01018801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/188 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/188

---

Article 323

The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall ensure that the financial means are made available to allow the Union to fulfil its legal obligations in respect of third parties.

---
##### 



Exhibit 12.7
 Illinois Power Company
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Combined
Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Ratios)
 Year Ended December 31,2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004(1)
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006Net income from continuing operations
    
    $
    162,989
    
    
    $
    117,113
    
    
    $
    137,538
    
    
    $
    97,039
    
    
    $
    56,659Less- Change in accounting principle
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (2,294
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Less- Income from equity investee
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Add- Taxes based on income
    
    
    104,209
    
    
    
    76,023
    
    
    
    87,591
    
    
    
    65,171
    
    
    
    37,246Net income before income taxes and change in
accounting principle
    
    
    267,198
    
    
    
    195,430
    
    
    
    225,129
    
    
    
    162,210
    
    
    
    93,905Add- fixed charges:Interest on long term debt
    
    
    94,738
    
    
    
    146,045
    
    
    
    112,616
    
    
    
    41,028
    
    
    
    46,167Estimated interest cost within rental expense
    
    
    2,442
    
    
    
    1,895
    
    
    
    1,696
    
    
    
    1,290
    
    
    
    205Amortization of net debt premium, discount,
expenses and losses
    
    
    18,135
    
    
    
    17,751
    
    
    
    18,772
    
    
    
    2,315
    
    
    
    3,537Total fixed charges
    
    
    115,315
    
    
    
    165,691
    
    
    
    133,084
    
    
    
    44,633
    
    
    
    49,909Earnings available for fixed charges
    
    
    382,513
    
    
    
    361,121
    
    
    
    358,213
    
    
    
    206,843
    
    
    
    143,814Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    3.31
    
    
    
    2.17
    
    
    
    2.69
    
    
    
    4.63
    
    
    
    2.88Earnings required for combined fixed
charges and preferred stock dividends:Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    2,294
    
    
    
    2,294
    
    
    
    2,294
    
    
    
    2,294
    
    
    
    2,294Adjustment to pre-tax basis
    
    
    1,466
    
    
    
    1,434
    
    
    
    1,461
    
    
    
    1,542
    
    
    
    1,5083,760
    
    
    
    3,728
    
    
    
    3,755
    
    
    
    3,836
    
    
    
    3,802Combined fixed charges and preferred stock
dividend requirements
    
    $
    119,075
    
    
    $
    169,419
    
    
    $
    136,839
    
    
    $
    48,469
    
    
    $
    53,711Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
and preferred stock dividend requirements
    
    
    3.21
    
    
    
    2.13
    
    
    
    2.61
    
    
    
    4.26
    
    
    
    2.67
 
 (1)
    
    Ameren Corporation purchased Illinois Power Company on September 30, 2004, amounts include combined predecessor and successor
financial information.
**EXHIBIT 32.a**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofBoston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Manning,Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner ofthe Partnership’s general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after dueinquiry:

 
| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and  Exchange Act of 1934; and                |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                      |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result  of operations of the Partnership. |

 

 
| Date:              |   |                               |
|--------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
| July 14, 2005 |   | /s/ John P. Manning |   |
|               |   |                               |
|               |   | John P. Manning          |
|               |   | Principal Executive Officer        |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging,or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
19882

#### State v. Bohol

Affirmed
21753

#### State v. Shields

Affirmed