alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph Tittle, Appellant, *v.*Samuel Katz et al., Defendants, and Gertrude Bertorelli et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

April 2, 1959.

*Lieberman & Lee (Carroll & Trapani*of counsel), for appellant.

*Benjamin Sharaga*and *Harold H. Boxer*for respondents.

*868*Per Curiam.*

Bule XXVII of the New York City Court Buies is substantially the same as the Special Bule Bespecting Calendar Practice of the New York County Supreme Court. Under that rule, unless the defendant moves within 20 days after the filing of the certificate of readiness to strike the case from the calendar, he waives his right to take the plaintiff’s deposition, at least in the absence of special, unusual or extraordinary circumstances *(Price*v. *Brody,*7 A D 2d 204). No such circumstances are shown here, and the defendant did not move within 20 days to strike the case from the calendar.

It was, therefore, error to dismiss the complaint unless the plaintiff submitted to examination.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Concur — Hoestadter, J. P., Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.
----

| Re: | Charming      Shoppes Master Trust Class A FloatingRate |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Asset Backed      Certificates, Series 1999-2 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|

----

| Sincerely      yours,                                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |
| CLIPPER      RECEIVABLES COMPANY, LLC,                   |
| as      the Class A Purchaser                            |
| By: _________________                               |
| Name:                                                    |
| Title:                                                   |
|                                                     |
|                                                     |
| STATE      STREET GLOBAL MARKETS, LLC,                   |
| as      the Administrator                                |
| By: _________________                               |
| Name:  Thomas      Loughlin                    |
| Title:    Senior      Vice President |

|   | S-1 | Charming      Shoppes Series 1999-2Letter      Agreement |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------|

----

| CHARMING      SHOPPES RECEIVABLES CORP.,          |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| as      the Seller and as the Class B Purchaser   |
| By: ______________                           |
| Name:  Kirk      R. Simme               |
| Title:    Vice      President |
|                                              |
| SPIRIT      OF AMERICA, INC.                      |
| as      the Servicer                              |
| By: ______________                           |
| Name:  Kirk      R. Simme               |
| Title:    Vice      President |

|   | S-2 | Charming      Shoppes Series 1999-2Letter      Agreement |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Acknowledged      and Agreed:                     |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |
| STATE      STREET BANK & TRUST COMPANY,       |
| as      Liquidity Agent and Purchaser             |
|                                              |
|                                              |
| By: ___________________                      |
| Name:  Thomas      Loughlin             |
| Title:    Vice      President |

|   | S-3 | Charming      Shoppes Series 1999-2Letter      Agreement |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------|

----
May 11, 1999

21905

#### Hono Koa Vacation Club v. County of Maui

Affirmed
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Northwest Airlines, Inc., Delta Airlines, Inc. 

AirTran Airways Inc., Continental Airlines, 

Inc., Southwest Airlines, Inc. 

Complainants / Appellees 

Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis 

International Airport, BAA-Indianapolis 

Respondents / Appellants 

m 

l_,: —irDocket No. 16-07-04 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for FederallyAssisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules of Practice). Pursuant 

to the Rules of Practice, Section 16.11 (a), the date by which the Final Agency Decision 

will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to June 24, 2009. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination 

in this case. 

^•^ , 

Catherine M. Lang 

Acting Associate Adi 

for Airports 

istrator 

^j^ate 

zv^ 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on IUOJ I l3^M ? I caused to be placed in the 

United States mail (first class mail, postage ^id ) a true copy of the Notice of Extension 

of Time addressed to: 

For Complainants 

Robert E. Cohn 

Jonathan L. Abram 

Patrick R. Rizzi 

HOGAN & HARTSON, L.L.P. 

555 Thirteenth Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Brian Mattingly, 

Regional Director Airport Affairs 

Gary Bunce, 

Assistant General Counsel 

NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

2700 Lone Oak Parkway 

Eagan,MN 55121 

Joseph Zang 

Assistant General Counsel 

Rebecca Bays, 

General Attorney 

DELTA AIR LINES INC 

1030 Delta Boulevard 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

Richard P. Magurno 

Senior Vice President & General Counsel 

AIR TRAN AIRWAYS, INC 

9955 AirTran Boulevard 

Orlanda, FA 32827 

Lorraine B. Hailoway 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Counsel for Continental Airlines, Inc. 

Robert W. Kneisley 

Associate General Counsel 

Leslie Abbott 

Attorney 

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. 

1901 L Street, NW, Suite 640 

Washington, DC 20036 

Thomas Newton Boiling 

Managing Attorney, Regulatory Affairs 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC 

P.O. Box 4607 - HQSLG 

Houston, TX 77210 
For Respondents 

Pablo O. Nuesch 

Jeffrey A. Schwarz 

SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID LLP 

1333 New Hampshire Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20036 

Robert A. Duncan 

Airport Director 

Indianapolis Airport Authority 

Indianapolis International Airport 

2500 South High School Road, Suite 100 

Indianapolis, IN 46241-4943 

Copy to FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

^ Vl<^^^. 

Almaria Gd&ySnfor 

Office of/wport Compliance 

and Fiela Operations
EXHIBIT 23



                                       76
<PAGE>





                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion in this
Form 10-K of our report dated January 22, 1999. It should be noted that we have
not audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to January 3,
1999, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Philadelphia, PA
March 29, 1999



                                       77
<PAGE>

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Form S-8
Registration Statements File Nos. 33-32835, 33-38748, 33-42451, 33-49730,
33-83074, and 333-19229.

                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Philadelphia, PA
March 29, 1999



                                       78
<PAGE>
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

NOV 7 2003

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

MARK D. RICE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PRISCILLA HELM, OKC Police

Detective,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 03-6226

(D.C. No. 03-CV-252-R)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, BRISCOE, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.**

Defendant-Appellant Mark D. Rice, an inmate appearing pro se, appeals

from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b)(1) and § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which

relief may be granted. The district court counted the dismissal as a prior occasion
- 2 -

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The parties are familiar with the facts and we

will not repeat them herein. The district court correctly held that (1) this

successive § 1983 action cannot be used as a discovery tool for a collateral attack

on Mr. Rice’s convictions, and (2) the official capacity claim against the

individual defendant fails to allege a constitutional violation caused by a custom

or policy of the municipality. See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 488-90

(1973) (claim for injunctive relief is only cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2254);

Kutzner v. Montgomery County, 303 F.3d 339, 341 (5th Cir. 2002) (§ 1983 action

may not be used for discovery when remedy lies with § 2254); Collins v. City of

Harker Heights, 503 U.S. 115, 120-22 (1992) (constitutional violation must be

product of official custom or policy to hold municipality liable). We affirm for

substantially the reasons relied upon by the district court. R. Doc. 14. 

AFFIRMED. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and

immediate payment of the unpaid balance of the appellate filing fee is due.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
Annex 3

**USA COMMENTS IN RED FONT**

**WORK PROGRAMME FOR**

**THE TERRESTRIAL ANIMAL HEALTH STANDARDS COMMISSION**

Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2023	1

Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2023	1

Report of the Meeting of the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission/February 2023	1
#### CAPITAL TRAWLERS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Appellee. CUMBERLAND FISHERIES, INC. et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Appellee.

Nos. 6151, 6152.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

Dec. 3, 1963.

Joseph J. Lyman, Washington, D. C, with whom Benjamin Thompson, Portland, Me. and Philip G. Willard, Portland, Me, were on brief, for appellants.

Rufus E. Stetson, Jr, Atty, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C, with whom Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen, Washington, D. C, Lee A. Jackson and I. Henry Kutz, Attys, Dept, of Justice,. Washington, D. C, Alton A. Lessard, U. S. Atty, Portland, Me, and William E.. McKinley, Asst. U. S. Atty, Portland, Me, were on brief, for appellee.

Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the District Court on the opinion of Judge Gignoux, D.C., 216 F. Supp. 440.
December 20, 2005

26578

#### Bednarz v. State

Affirmed
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 

THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC. 

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO TRUST AGREEMENT 

This Amendment No. 1 to Trust Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of June 15, 2018 (the
“Effective Date”) by and between The Greenbrier Companies, Inc., an Oregon corporation (the “Company”), and Reliance Trust Company, a trust organization under the laws of the United States of America. 

RECITALS 

A.    The parties have entered into that certain Trust Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2012 (the
“Trust Agreement”), establishing a trust (the “Company Share Trust”) to hold shares of the Company’s common stock that are subject to deferral elections by participants in The Greenbrier Companies Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (the “Plan”). 
 B.    The parties wish to
amend the Trust Agreement to provide that voting rights associated with shares of Company common stock held in the Company Share Trust will be exercised by the Company. 

The parties therefore agree as follows: 

AGREEMENT 

1.    Amendment to Trust Agreement. Section 5(b) of the Trust Agreement is
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“(b)    All rights associated with assets of the Trust shall be
exercised by the Trustee and shall in no event be exercised by or rest with Plan participants, except that notwithstanding any other provision of this Trust Agreement, voting rights with respect to Trust assets will be exercised by the
Company.” 
 2.    No Further Amendments. Except as amended hereby, the Trust
Agreement remains in full force and effect. 
 This Amendment has been executed as of the Effective Date by a duly
authorized representative of each party. 
  

									
	The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.	 		 	Reliance Trust Company
					
	By:	 	  
	 		 	By:	  	  

					
	Title:	 	  
	 		 	Title:
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 16, 2021 No. 04-21-00242-CV ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS and Bill Magness, Appellants
v. CPS ENERGY , Appellee From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-CI-04574 Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellee's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to September 13, 2021.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of August, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12176Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Emily Ritter (not verified)PermalinkNovember 15, 2022 - 4:40pmI moved to the DMV after growing up in the Pisgah National Forest and I cannot wait to visit this piece of home in my new city.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Representative Joseph Walsh Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    American Beech

Year
    1920

Location
      
Capitol Square, S.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text on the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Memorial Tree

*Fagus grandiflora*
(American Beech)

Planted by
Representative Joseph Walsh (Mass.)

April 15, 1920
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    The Rep. Joseph Walsh tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.

The Rep. Joseph Walsh tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
    The Rep. Joseph Walsh tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.

The Rep. Joseph Walsh tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.
    The Rep. Joseph Walsh tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.

The Rep. Joseph Walsh tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
    The Rep. Joseph Walsh tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

The Rep. Joseph Walsh tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

      Previous Image
        Next Image

          The Rep. Joseph Walsh tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
      The Rep. Joseph Walsh tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.
      The Rep. Joseph Walsh tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
      The Rep. Joseph Walsh tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

NVAP: National Accreditation Number

Last Modified: 

Print

Each accredited veterinarian is assigned a six-digit National Accreditation Number

(NAN). A NAN does not authorize veterinarians to perform accredited duties

nationally. Veterinarians must be granted authorization from the APHIS Veterinary

Medical Officer overseeing each State in which they wish to perform accredited

duties.

You can use a NAN in the following ways:

1. To print Certificates of Completion for each Web-based module of APHIS

approved supplemental training (AAST)  

2. To create a record of attendance on the AAST Sign-In Sheet when attending

AAST lectures at veterinary conferences  

3. To document performance of accreditation duties, use your NAN as instructed

by the APHIS Veterinary Medical Officer overseeing each State in which you are

authorized

Contact Us

NVAP Coordinators
For questions about NVAP, contact your local NVAP Coordinator by selecting your

State or Territory from the dropdown menu below or visit More Information About

NVAP.

- Select a State - ▾

Loading...

All Contacts

Export requirements frequently change. Obtain current export requirements for live

animals or animal products before each shipment.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING COMPANY

(required by Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of Ameren Energy Generating Company (the Registrant) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Form 10-K), each undersigned officer of the Registrant does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  March 7, 2006



/s/ R. Alan KelleyR. Alan KelleyPresident(Principal Executive Officer)




/s/ Warner L. BaxterWarner L. BaxterChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 11.01

                             Interpore International
                      Computations of Net Income Per Share
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                      -----------------------------------------
                                                         1997           1996          1995
                                                      ------------  -------------  ------------
<S>                                                     <C>           <C>            <C>
Net income                                              $   2,771     $     658      $   2,038
                                                      ============  =============  ============

Shares used in computing net income per share - basic:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding                7,002         6,996          6,752

Effect of dilutive securities:
  Weighted average convertible preferred stock                 67           166            454
  Common share equivalents outstanding                        332           306            329
                                                      ------------  -------------  ------------
Shares used in computing net income per share -
diluted                                                     7,401         7,468          7,535
                                                      ============  =============  ============

Net income per share - basic                            $    0.40     $    0.09      $    0.30
                                                      ============  =============  ============

Net income per share - diluted                          $    0.37     $    0.09      $    0.27
                                                      ============  =============  ============
</TABLE>