alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01005301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/53

---

Article 7

The Union shall ensure consistency between its policies and activities, taking all of its objectives into account and in accordance with the principle of conferral of powers.

---
Exhibit 10.21

 

6th AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LICENSE AGREEMENT

 

6th AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LICENSE AGREEMENT, (“6th Amendment”) effective as of June 10, 2016 (“Effective Date”), by and between The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, having an address at 100 Europa Drive, Suite 430, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27517, (“University”), and Liquidia Technologies, Inc., a corporation existing under the laws of Delaware, and having an address at 419 Davis Drive, Suite 100, Morrisville, NC 27560 (“Licensee”).

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS, Licensee and University have entered into an Amended and Restated License Agreement dated as of December 15, 2008, First Amendment dated June 8, 2009, Second Amendment dated June 1, 2012, Third Amendment dated October 7, 2014, 4th Amendment dated July 22, 2015, and 5th Amendment dated November 12, 2015 (collectively the “Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, University and Licensee wish to amend the Agreement to extend the term for Milestone U under the Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth below.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained in the Agreement and herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1.                                      The date for completion of Milestone U shall be amended to replace “January 1, 2018”, with “December 31, 2020”.

 

2.                                      This 6th Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this 6th Amendment to Amended and Restated License Agreement by their duly authorized officers or representatives.

 

	
THE   UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL
    	
 
    	
LIQUIDIA   TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
BY:
    	
/s/   Jacqueline Quay
    	
 
    	
BY:
    	
/s/   Shawn Glidden
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Jacqueline   Quay
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Shawn   Glidden
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Director   of Licensing, OCED
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
VP   Legal Affairs & Secretary
#### B. F., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. J-76-322.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

June 4, 1976.

*992Wesley B. Bennett, Sallisaw, for appellant.

John W. Russell Jr., Dist. Atty., for ap-pellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BLISS, Judge:

Appellant, B. F., was adjudicated a delinquent child and a ward of the court in the Sequoyah County District Court, Case No. JF-76-14, pursuant to 10 O.S.1971, § 1114. From this adjudication the Appellant has perfected an attempted appeal to this Court.

The Appellant predicates the appeal solely upon the contention that the Juvenile Court should have sustained his Demurrer to the Evidence presented at the adjudicatory hearing. The Appellant asserts the evidence was insufficient for the reason that the only evidence connecting the Appellant with the crime charged by the allegations of the Petition was the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.

We find the Appellant’s position should be sustained by this Court’s decision in *Smith v. State,*Okl.Cr., 525 P.2d 1251 (1974).

However, the record in the instant reflects that this appeal is taken from an adjudicatory order adjudging B. F. to be a juvenile and a ward of the court and not an appeal from a final dispositional order of the Juvenile Court. Thus, no final ap-pealable order has been entered by the Juvenile Court. See *Matter of B.*J., Okl. Cr., 546 P.2d 1354 (1976). For this reason, the instant appeal is *DISMISSED.*Before proceeding with the dispositional hearing, the trial court’s attention is directed to *Smith v. State,*supra.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to issue the Mandate *FORTHWITH.*

BRETT, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Traveling From Another Country

Last Modified: 

Print

Travelers entering the United States must declare all agricultural and wildlife

products to U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials. They will determine

whether your products can enter the country after checking to make sure they meet

entry requirements and do not harbor harmful foreign pests or diseases. We

recommend that you keep receipts and original packaging for agricultural products

as proof of their country of origin.

Know What You CAN and CANNOT Bring into the

United States

If there is something special you want to bring with you from another country, you’ll

need to plan ahead. Get specific guidance by choosing from the types of items

below.

As long as you declare all agricultural products to U.S. Customs and Border

Protection officials, you will not face any penalties—even if an inspector

determines that the items cannot enter the country.
What Do You Want To Bring into the United

States?

Meat, Poultry, and Seafood 

Fruits and Vegetables 

Plants, Plant Parts, Cut Flowers, and Seeds 

Coffee, Tea, Honey, Nuts, and Spices 

Soil, Peat, Sand, Clay, Rocks, and Stones 
Dairy and Egg Products 

Souvenirs 

Musical Instruments 

Pets 

Need Help?
Traveling to Hawai’i for the Festival of the Pacific Arts and Culture

(FestPAC) with a costume or cultural item made from plant or animal

material? FestPAC attendees with agricultural imports should contact the APHIS

Honolulu Plant Inspection Station at 1-808-834-3240 or email:

honolulu.pis@usda.gov for details on how to import these materials legally. Plan

early. Paperwork may be required.

Plants and Plant Products

Plants and plant products can include fruits, vegetables, plant parts, seeds, soil, and

souvenirs made from wood or plants. If you have questions about whether a

particular plant or plant product can be brought into the United States, contact

USDA’s Plant Import Information.

For general questions:

Plant Permits Team

Email: plantproducts.permits@usda.gov

Phone: 877-770-5990

Animal Products

Animal products can include meat, milk, dairy, and eggs. If you have questions

about whether a particular animal product can be brought into the United States,

contact USDA’s Animal Product Import and Export unit.

For general requests:

Animal Product Import and Export Team

Email: apie@usda.gov

Phone: 301-851-3300

Note:
Email is preferred.

Traveling From Another Country Contacts
25586

#### State v. Maneafaiga

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Phytosanitary Issues Management

Last Modified: 

Print

The Phytosanitary Issues Management (PIM) unit facilitates and negotiates, through

the use of scientifically based processes, the safe export and import of agricultural

commodities.

PIM acts on behalf of APHIS' Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) program as the

recognized National Plant Protection Organization (NPPO) for the United States under

the International Plant Protection Convention. Consistent with responsibilities of this

role, PIM does the following:

Serves as the primary point of contact for communications with trading

partners (NPPO) concerning phytosanitary issues

Works to remove trade technical barriers by:

Encouraging trading partners to harmonize with international standards

and guidelines

Initiating and presenting scientific and technical studies to support safe,

science-based trade

Building domestic and international consensus among trading partners,

industry, scientific community, PPQ, and other U.S. agencies for feasible,

science-based solutions to technical trade barriers

Working with the PPQ field organization and State regulatory officers to

implement new programs and procedures to support science-based trade

Plant Health Technical Bilateral Meetings 
View information about upcoming Plant Health Technical Bilateral Meetings

Glossary of Phytosanitary Terms 

The International Plant Protection Convention's Glossary of Phytosanitary Terms is a

reference standard, listing terms and definitions with specific meaning for

phytosanitary systems worldwide.
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Requesting Wildlife Services Support 

Last Modified: 

Print

Wildlife Services has offices in every State ready to support you in resolving your

wildlife damage concerns. Contact your local office for information on wildlife

damage management, technical assistance, and support for your management

efforts.
Contact Our State Offices

Wildlife Services leads our Nation's efforts to manage conflicts between people and

wildlife so they can coexist. We have professionals available throughout the country

to help address wildlife-related problems, such as livestock predation, crop losses,

property damage, and more. What can we help you with?

Get information about managing wildlife damage caused by feral swine,

vultures, waterfowl, starlings and blackbirds, nutria, beavers, brown tree snakes

, or other wildlife.

Learn how nonlethal predator management can protect livestock on your farm

or ranch.

Confirm if APHIS has conducted wildlife management activities, such as rabies

oral vaccination bait drops, in your area.

Find out about focus areas of wildlife management in your State.

Wildlife Damage Assistance

Find your State office in the dropdown menu or call 866-4USDA-WS to be

automatically routed to a State office based on the area code you are calling from.

- Select a State - ▾

Loading...

Requesting Wildlife Services Support Contacts

Learn About Wildlife Services' Work

National Programs 

Wildlife Services provides Federal leadership and expertise to resolve wildlife

conflicts to allow people and wildlife to coexist. Our national programs are vital to

the success of this mission. 

Operational Activities 

Our employees carryout a range of operational activities to protect agriculture,

natural resources, property and health and safety. 

Protected Resources 
We use an integrated wildlife damage management approach to protect agriculture,

natural resources, property, and human health and safety.

National Wildlife Research Center 

The National Wildlife Research Center is the research unit of Wildlife

Services. Scientists and support staff are dedicated to finding solutions to

challenging wildlife damage management problems related to agriculture, natural

resources, property, and human health and safety.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Paul Pincus Memorial Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Pin Oak

Year
    1995

Location
      
Capitol Square, N.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text of the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds 
Memorial Tree

*Quercus palustris*
(Pin Oak)

Sponsored by 
Sen. Paul Sarbanes

In Honor of Paul Pincus's 
Retirement, Landscape Architect

September 15, 1995 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# --

# ~ . .**~- .·."** **.** __ c¢: · .

# ·~**··· ·~·**  .. J' ···. .

# ·.**{,l ~~** **=** ..... ·

.·.-

..

# tJ ·. '

.. ;**·~ ~**  ,- : ,**~ ~~;**  UNMANNED AERIAL SoLUTIONs, INc.



### Blue

- Chip Unmanned Aerial Solutions, Inc. Attn: C lint P. Stevens 1965 South Beech St. Wichita, KS 67207 316

- 305-5498

April 22, 2015

US. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations 1200 New Jersey Ave

. , SE Washington, DC 20590 

### Re: Request to amend and allow for Blue-Chip UAS, Inc. the ability to utilize additional sUAS platforms under the same direction as provided within exemption #11172, docket# FAA -2 014

- 0787

- 0009,

. approved February 10, 2015. Dear Sir/Madam, Dear Sir or Madam ; Blue

- Chip Unmanned Aerial Solutions, Inc

. (Blue

- Chip UAS) was issued an exemption under Section 333 of the " FAA Modernization and Reform act of 

### 2012 " (the "Reform Act") numbered 

### 11172 (the Exempt io n) for the purpose of conducting UAS operations within the oil and gas , agriculture , wildlife and aerial photography industries. Blue-Chip UAS , herby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow an additional type of electric " FL'Xed Wing " unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to be operated in full compliance with the conditions set forth within the Exemption

. Blue-Chip UAS, requests permission to operate the following UAS based on their type , size , weight, and speed under the same terms and conditions contained within the Exemption and provided by the parameters set forth in regards to capabilities and limitations ide ntified within the Flight Operations Manual and Maintenance Manual attached as provided.Precision Hawk Lancaster Altavian Nova F6500 Fixed Wing Fixed Wing 4ft Span 9ft Span Weight <lOlbs <16lbs Speed <60mph <70mph Blue

- Chip UAS, respectfully requests the same finding from the FAA as provided to Aerial Mob, LLC as to their amended exemption numbered 11066A, docket ID FAA-2014-0353, dated February 2, 2015. As indicated, the FAA found the amendment request was not precedent setting, that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register and that any delay in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the organization

. Thank you for your time in regards to this petition and please direct any correspondence to 

### Mr. C lint Stevens.

Clint P. Stevens Executive Director & Co

-Founder Blue

- Chip UAS, Inc. 316

- 305

- 5498

cc: Robert Pappas Kiera Jones John Barbagallo
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05732

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05732\05732_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

05732\05732_ Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 05732\05732_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05732\05732_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05732\05732_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05732\05732_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05732\05732_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_0ME4WB1_4.TIF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL1_5.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL10.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL11_1.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL15.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL16.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL2_7.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL3_3.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL4_3.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL5_2.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL6_2.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL7_2.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL8_2.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05732\Supporting Documents\05732_CVGRPL9_3.tif Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
27372

#### Tupuola v. State

Affirmed
No. 92-7856.

#### Cole *v.*Mississippi (two cases).

Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.
#### Earl C. FREIS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WHEELER MACHINERY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 14184.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 8, 1976.

*909Lyle J. Barnes, Kaysville, for plaintiff and appellant.

Raymond M. Berry, of Worsley, Snow & Christensen, Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a judgment of no cause of action following a jury verdict to the same effect. Affirmed with costs on appeal to respondent.

Mr. Freis, plaintiff, was a driver sitting in the cab of his truck-tractor pulling two trailers, that, while motionless, in a traffic line awaiting clearance after a traffic accident up front, claims to have been injured when another truck-trailer, approaching from behind and driven by defendant’s driver Bosch, who in inclement weather, in attempting to avoid a collision, took evasive action by attempting to straddle a road median, but negligently in doing so, struck a glancing blow against the door of plaintiff’s cab.

Plaintiff, according to believable evidence, in a sort of res gestae situation, told several onlookers he was not injured. Nonetheless, about 14 months later- he reported an injury to his neck to his superior and filed a suit attributing such injury to the incident mentioned.

On evidence that the rather voluminous record reveals to be controversial and somewhat speculative, but believable, in favor of defendant, the jury came up with a no cause of action verdict.

Mr. Freis advances two points on appeal, —1) That it was error to give the case to the jury, — and having done so, not to have upset it, and 2) in not granting a new trial, — all of which adds up to one point: That the evidence did not support the verdict, — with which urgence this court cannot subscribe.

The jury was confronted with two questions: 1) Was there negligence attributable to defendant? and 2) Was plaintiff injured?- — -to both of which the jury answered no.

The record would indicate that the question of negligence may have been one that would require a jury to examine the evidence more carefully than in the run of the mill case, — but we are not they who in the first instance decide a controversial factual matter as this case presents, unless arbitrariness, and/or caprice rise to plague us. We see no alternative here save to affirm.

CROCKETT, J., concurs.

ELLETT,.TUCKETT and MAUGHAN, JJ., concur in the result.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 In connection with the Quarterly Report of T-3 Energy Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Gus D. Halas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ GUS D. HALASGus D. HalasChief Executive OfficerMay 5, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to T-3 Energy
Services, Inc. and will be retained by T-3 Energy Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
September 21, 2006

25590

#### Bender v. Lee

Affirmed
44 P.3d 287

April 18, 2002

22873

#### Foytik v. Chandler

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply11796Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Johnathan Wells (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 24, 2022 - 1:39amThis is a awesome story, Congrats keep moving FORWARD.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SEVEN

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 337

(ex Article 284 TEC)

(ex Article 284 TEC)

The Commission may, within the limits and under conditions laid down by the Council acting by a simple majority in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties, collect any information and carry out any checks required for the performance of the tasks entrusted to it.

---
January 26, 2000

22182

#### State v. Norris

Affirmed