alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT —APPELLATE DIVISION — FOURTH DEPARTMENT.

May 2, 1923.

#### THE PEOPLE v. MORRIS DEITSCH.

(205 App. Div. 446.)

Rape — Evidence—Testimony of complaining witness not corroborated within Penal Law, § 2013.

Testimony of tho complaining witness, a child nine years of age, on a prosecution for rape, is not sufficiently corroborated under section 2013 of the Penal Law by evidence which shows merely that the defendant was in the vicinity of child's home at about the time of the alleged crime.

Clark and Davis, JJ., dissent.

-Appeal by the defendant, Morris Deitsch, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, rendered against him at the Erie Trial Term on the 29th day of September, 1922, convicting him of the crime of rape in the first degree.

*John J. Brown,*for the appellant.

*Guy B. Moore, District Attorney*(J*ohn J. Kane, Assistant District Attorney,*of counsel), for the respondent.

Crouch, J.:

The defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree. The commission of the crime was sufficiently proved. The -sole question was whether or not the defendant committed it. He was identified by the complaining witness, a child about nine years of age. The only corroborating evidence was given by a woman residing nearby who testified that she saw defendant on the morning in question about ten minutes to eight standing in the street or in the entrance in front of the premises where the *361child lived; that he was standing still and muttering something. The child said the assault occurred about eight o’clock.

At most that was merely evidence of opportunity. It does not give the support required by law to the testimony of the female defiled. (Penal Law, § 2013; People v. Countryman, 201 App. Div. 805; People v. Kingsley, 166 id. 320; People v. Shaw, 158 id. 146; People v. O’Farrell, 175 N. Y. 326.)

The judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial granted.

All concur, except Clark and Davis, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance.

Judgment of conviction reversed and new trial granted.
106 P.3d 1120

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### Chun v. Board of Trustees of Employees' Retirement System of State of Hawai'i; Southwood v. Board of Trustees of Employees' Retirement System of State of Hawai'i

23892

02/22/2005

Denied

106 Hawai'i 416, 106 P.3d 339
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE II

FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

CHAPTER 1

THE CUSTOMS UNION

Article 31

(ex Article 26 TEC)

(ex Article 26 TEC)

Common Customs Tariff duties shall be fixed by the Council on a proposal from the Commission.

---
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

AND
THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant.

__________________________ 2009-1372, -1380, -1416, -1417

__________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in case nos. 06-CV-11109 and 06-CV-11585, Judge Rya W. Zobel.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

_________________________ MCKESSON TECHNOLOGIES INC. (FORMERLY MCKESSON INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, LLC), Plaintiff-Appellant

v.AKAMAI TECH v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS 2 MCKESSON TECH V

. EPIC SYSTEMS

EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________
2010-1291

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in case no. 06-C V -2965, Chief Judge Jack T. Camp.

________________________

ON MOTION

________________________

O R D E R

Appellant Akamai Technologies, Inc. in Appeal No. 2009-1372, and Appellant McKesson Technolgies Inc. in Appeal No. 2010-1291 separately move for a 14-day extension of time to file a reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
The motions are granted. The briefs are due September 6, 2011.AKAMAI TECH v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS MCKESSON TECH V

. EPIC SYSTEMS 3

F OR T HE C OURT

August 12, 2011 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Donald R. Dunner, Esq. Robert S. Frank, Jr., Esq. Aaron M. Panner, Esq. Daryl L. Joseffer, Esq. William H. Boice, Esq.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P. (the Company) for the
period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony J. Nocchiero, Vice President of Terra
Nitrogen GP Inc., the general partner of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



/s/ ANTHONY J. NOCCHIERO Anthony J. Nocchiero Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Terra Nitrogen GP Inc., general partner of
Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P.
(Principal Financial Officer)Dated: May 7, 2010


35

---
July15, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Raw data of demographics supporting the following documents:

“ Preliminary Review of Envi ronmental Justice Impacts” Document ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008- 0329-0519, “Preliminary Environmental Jus tice Analysis for Diversion of Secondary Materials and Other Impacts Relating to the Proposed Rule: Ident ification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials

That Are Solid Waste” Document ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329-0527

FROM: Tab Tesnau Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

EPA received a request for the de mographic data supporting the “ Preliminary Review of Environmental Justice Impacts” and the “Preliminary Environmental Justice Analysis for Diversion of Secondary Materials and Other Impacts Relating to the Proposed Rule: Identification of Non-Hazardous Sec ondary Materials That Are Solid Waste. ” Per that request, EPA is including this information in the docke t for this rule. The attached file contains demographic results at one and three miles around disposal and processing facilities, but does not include information about each facility so as to not infringe copyright protection.

Using U.S. Census data for 2000, EPA developed the demographic da ta for facilities that may

receive additional waste diverted from combustion. The copyrighted information that is not

included in the electronic docke t is the facility spreadsheet produced by Waste Business Journal (“Directory & Atlas of Non-Hazardous Waste Sites 2008”) a nd “The Scrap Tire & Rubber Users Directory” that identify site s that process scrap tires.

The full data set with the copyrighted informa tion has been added in hardcopy format to the docket (Document ID for the full hard copy version: EPA- HQ-RCRA-2008-0329-0554.1)

Attachment: raw data of demographics at one and three miles for the divers ion analysis (without facility information)
**Exhibit 23.5**

** **

**DeGolyer and MacNaughton**

5001 Spring Valley Road

Suite 800 East

Dallas, Texas 75244

 

February 21, 2008

 

 

Nexen Inc.

801-7thAvenue S.W.

Calgary,Alberta  T2P 3P7

 

Boardof Directors:

 

Wehereby consent to references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton relating to ourevaluation of certain oil and gas properties of Nexen Inc. (Nexen) contained inthe section entitled “Basis of Reserves Estimates” within “Reserves, Productionand Related Information” as set out in Part I, Items 1&2 Business andProperties of Nexen’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2007.

 
|   | Very  truly yours,            |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                          |
|   | /s/  DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON |
|   |                          |
|   | DeGOLYER  and MacNAUGHTON     |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Pecker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-K of American Media Operations, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238, 34-47986, 33-8618, and 33-8760];

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ DAVID J. PECKERDavid J. PeckerChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)


Date: August 30, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

# AGENCY:

U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

# ACTION:

Reopening of Notice of information collection; request for comment.

# SUMMARY:

USAID is reopening the comment period for its proposed information collection, “USAID Revisions to ADS 201 Evaluation Report Requirements”. Reopening the comment period will allow USAID to satisfy the 60-day public comment period required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA).

# DATES:

                        The comment period for the information collection published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on March 28, 2023, at 88 FR 18292, is reopened. Comments should be received on or before December 11, 2023.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 4 days of publication of this notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Tania Alfonso,                         *talfonso@usaid.gov,*                         202-712-0144.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    USAID, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on the proposed survey. USAID initially published a Notice of the proposed information collection, “USAID Revisions to ADS 201 Evaluation Report Requirements,” in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 28, 2023 [88 FR 18292]. Due to a clerical error, the comment period closed after 56 days on May 23, 2023, and therefore did not meet not the statutory 60-day comment period required by the PRA. To meet the 60-day comment period requirement, USAID is reopening the comment period for the Notice until December 11, 2023.                

Tania Alfonso,

PPL/LER, Program Cycle Supervisory Team Lead, USAID.

[FR Doc. 2023-26635 Filed 12-5-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6116-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.0




                      DIRECT INSITE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT






I, James A.  Cannavino,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Direct  Insite Corp.  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that::

(1)  The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the  Company for the three  months
     ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements
     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: May 22, 2006





                                        /s/James A. Cannavino
                                           -----------------------
                                           James A. Cannavino
                                           Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>




                      DIRECT INSITE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT






I, Michael J.  Beecher,  Chief  Financial  Officer of Direct  Insite Corp.  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the  Company for the three  months
     ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements
     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934); and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: May 22, 2006
                                     /s/ Michael J. Beecher
                                         -----------------------
                                         Michael J. Beecher
                                         Chief Financial Officer
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Peer Review

Last Modified: 

Print

The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is providing this information to meet

the requirements of Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) "Final Information

Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" in the Federal Register on January 14, 2005.

OMB's Peer Review Bulletin established government-wide guidance to enhance the

practice of peer review of the federal government's science documents. It requires

federal agencies to systematically plan for peer review of influential scientific

information (including highly influential scientific assessments) that the government

intends to disseminate in the foreseeable future. By making these plans publicly

available, members of the public know which scientific documents are being peer

reviewed and approximately when and how the peer review will take place. In some

cases, members of the public may be allowed to nominate experts chosen to

participate in peer review panels. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has issued

guidance consistent with OMB's Bulletin.

The Bulletin provides specific requirements for peer reviews of highly influential

scientific assessments and influential scientific information disseminated by Federal

agencies, including posting the agenda and plans for such peer reviews on agency

Web sites. Members of the public who wish to comment on an individual plan may

send an email message by following the instructions at the end of the plan.
Current Peer Reviews

Wildlife Services: Human Health and Ecological Risk

Assessments

Created Document

Submit a Comment

You may comment on a peer review plan by sending an email to Ron Hardman. In

the subject line of the message, write an abbreviated title of the review.

Submit a Comment

Related Links

Quality of Information
# -=

u·s AIRWAYS September 7,2010
Mr. Paul Gretch Ms. Esta Rosenberg U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590



### Re: Application of Mesa Airlines, Inc. for a Statement of Authorization to Codeshare with EVA (Docket DOT-OST-2010-0216)
Dear Mr. Gretch and Ms. Rosenberg: We have polled the air carriers on the attached service list regarding the above-referenced Application. We received no objections. Accordingly, we respectfully request expedited consideration ofthis Application. Sincerely,

# ~J.JL- Howard Kass Vice President

- Legal Affairs Benjamin T. Slocum Director and Assistant General Counsel

Attachment cc: Service List

1401 H Street NW, Suite 1075 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 326-5154 Fax: (202) 898-4810CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that, on September 7,2010, I caused to be served a copy ofthe foregoing Letter by email upon those addressees listed below: byerlyjr@state.gov (Department ofState) esta.rosenberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation) john.allen@faa.gov (FederalAviation Administration) hkamen@coair.com (Continental) dan.weiss@coair.com (Continental) rbkeiner@crowell.com (Counsel for Continental) carl.nelson@aa.com (American) sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta) jeff.morgan@delta.com (Delta) jhill@dlalaw.com (Counsel forJetBlue and Hawaiian) robert.land@jetblue.com (JetBlue) msinick@ssd.com (Counsel forAlaska) steve.morrisey@united.com (United) jeffrey.manley@united.com (United) pmurphy@lopmurphy.com (Counsel for USA 3000) jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel forSpirit) dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel forSpirit) rpommer@atlasair.com (Atlas) dvaughan@kelleydrye.com (Counsel for UPS) dfisher@kelleydrye.com (Counsel for UPS) anbird@fedex.com (FedEx) nssparks@fedex.com (FedEx) kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com (Polar) efaberman@wileyrein.com (Counsel forAirTran)

# ~rJt-- Be Jamln T. Slocum
NUMBER 13-22-00224-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL ANTHONY VARGAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion to abate and remand and 

motion to dismiss. On June 17, 2022, appellant, the State of Texas, by and through its 

Criminal District Attorney, Honorable Luis V. Saenz, filed a motion to dismiss its appeal 

pursuant to Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.2(a). No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion and 
2

dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, appellant’s motion to abate and remand is denied as 

moot, and the entire appeal is hereby dismissed.

CLARISSA SILVA

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

30th day of June, 2022.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

NAHMS Goat Studies

Last Modified: 

Print

NAHMS conducted studies on health and management practices on U.S. goat

operations in 2019 and 2009.

See the complete list of all NAHMS studies and related materials

Loading...
Goat Studies
128 P.3d 891

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### Kiehm v. Adams.

25411

01/19/2006

Denied

109 Hawai'i 296, 126 P.3d 339
28778

#### State v. Corn

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet of CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd. at June 30, 1997, and its
statement of income for the six months then ended and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund XII,
Ltd. for the six months ended June 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,744,454
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  219,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,043
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      22,281,166
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,301,771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,410,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,323,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,410,560
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,096,832
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  292,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,945,829
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,945,829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,945,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd has an
unclassified balance sheet, therefore, no values are shown above
for current assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>