alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeWhat We DoMajor Projects
Deferred Maintenance
        
                  The Basics
      
Location
    U.S. Capitol Building
          U.S. Capitol Grounds
          Capitol Reflecting Pool
          Capitol Power Plant
          Rayburn House Office Building
          Thomas Jefferson Building
          John Adams Building
          U.S. Botanic Garden Production Facility

Status
    On GoingWhen the Architect of the Capitol (AOC) does not receive enough funding to pay for all maintenance and repairs required across the U.S. Capitol campus, work gets deferred due to budget constraints.

The failure to take care of major repairs and/or restore building components that have reached the end of their useful lives results in a deferred maintenance backlog. Infrastructure that is not properly cared for with scheduled maintenance and timely repair work can become unsightly, unsafe, more susceptible to damage, and can deteriorate more quickly.

Below are the most important maintenance needs for continued successful operation of the buildings and infrastructure across the Capitol campus, with a focus on reliability, safety, maintenance costs and energy conservation.

Air handling replacement
	Fire alarm system replacement
	Pipe repairs and replacement
	Roofing repairs and replacement
	Stone preservation
	Tunnel maintenance and repairs
	Water valve repairs
	Waterproofing replacementProperly maintained Capitol campus facilities reflect the pride of the nation. The AOC's goal is to address facility needs in an energy efficient and fiscally responsible manner to continue to serve Congress and the Supreme Court, preserve America's Capitol and inspire memorable experiences.
          
    
      

      We love our jobs. Do you? Come work with us.
        View Job Listings Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Benton and Bray Argued at Richmond, Virginia

CARLTON A. VAUGHAN, III MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 1596-96-2 JUDGE RICHARD S. BRAY JANUARY 20, 1998 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HANOVER COUNTY Richard H.C. Taylor, Judge L. Willis Robertson, Jr. (Cosby and Robertson, on brief), for appellant. Monica S. McElyea, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Carlton A. Vaughan, III, (defendant) appeals his conviction for several burglaries and related grand larcenies, arguing that the prosecutions violated Code § 19.2-243, the "speedy trial" statute. We agree and reverse the convictions. Defendant is familiar with the salient procedural history, and we recite only those circumstances necessary to a disposition of this appeal. Defendant and codefendants, John Bradley Madison and Gerald E. Baker, Jr., were prosecuted before the trial court for several burglaries and attendant offenses. Each defendant was represented by separate counsel, but the respective prosecutions shared identical procedural courses, together with like motions,

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - arguments, orders and other events pertaining to the speedy trial issue. Accordingly, each defendant appealed his convictions to this Court, asserting that Code § 19.2-243 barred the disputed prosecutions and convictions.

In Baker v. Commonwealth , a panel of this Court concluded that the Commonwealth had "fail[ed] to provide [codefendant Baker] a speedy trial as required by Code § 19.2-243" and reversed the convictions. 25 Va. App. 19, 20-21, 486 S.E.2d 111, 112, aff'd en banc , 26 Va. App. 175, 493 S.E.2d ____ (1997). Finding that Baker controls the disposition of this appeal, we similarly reverse and dismiss the instant convictions.

Reversed and dismissed.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0638 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-266-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### State v. Sambueno

17500

04/09/96

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Page School Class of 1982 Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    American Holly

Year
    1982

Location
      
Capitol Square, N.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text of the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Memorial Tree

*Ilex opaca*
(American Holly)

Planted by
1982 Graduation Class Page School

June 14, 1982 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE>

                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                      UNITED WASTE SYSTEMS, INC.
         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<CAPTION>
                                   Three Months        Three Months
                                      Ended                Ended
                                   March 31, 1997      March 31, 1996

<S>                               <C>                  <C>
Net income                        $       8,834,862    $    5,777,584

Historical weighted average
  common shares outstanding              40,413,674        36,499,932
Dilution of common stock options
    and warrants (1)                      2,292,990         2,573,420
Weighted average common shares 
  outstanding                            42,706,664        39,073,352
                                               $.21              $.15
</TABLE>
-----------------------
(1)  Based upon the treasury stock approach
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10K - YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                       179
<INVENTORY>                                      7,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,355
<PP&E>                                          27,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,987
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,408
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,017
<SALES>                                         28,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,693
<CGS>                                           23,274
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    375
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,675
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,050
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>
Before

DALY, BROWN, and de GROOT

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Aaron C. HAMILTON

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 202400034

_________________________

Decided: 19 July 2024

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judges:

Adam J. Workman

Sentence adjudged 3 October 2023 by a special court-martial convened 

at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a 

military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for five months, and a bad-conduct discharge.1

For Appellant:

Lieutenant Colonel Gregory P. Adams, USMCR

 

1 Appellant received 147 days of confinement credit.
United States v. Hamilton, NMCCA No. 202400034

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred.2

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON

Clerk of Court

 

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1569 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11, 2019 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff 

and Yuma to the list of locations in which court shall 

be held in the judicial district for the State of Arizona. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1569 RDS

1 SECTION 1. DISTRICT COURTS IN THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

2 FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA. 

3 Section 82 of title 28, United States Code, is amend4 ed by striking ‘‘Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, and Tucson’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘Flagstaff, Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tuc6 son, and Yuma’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 10, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 3, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00763

- CR

IN RE Shane CAIN

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On Octobe r 30, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has

considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The

court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on November 3 rd , 2014.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3 rd day of November, 2014

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 91

- 0984

- CR, styled The State of Texas v. Shane McClaine Cain , pending

in the 2nd 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable W.C. Kirkendall presiding.
#### State v. Senensi

18284

10/31/96

Vacated
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Washington's Farewell Address, 1796
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

In his farewell address at the end of his second term as president, George Washington urged America, "Observe good faith and justice toward all nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all." He is depicted here at his desk with Alexander Hamilton, who helped him write the address.

**Left:** The sawyer symbolizes Americans' increasing use of the land's natural resources.

**Right:** Sailing ships represent the importance of commerce with other nations.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The central east-west corridor is referred to as the Great Experiment Hall because it chronicles in 16 murals the legislative milestones of three centuries, from the signing of the Mayflower Compact in 1629 to the enactment of women's suffrage in 1920. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Exhibit 4.2

 

Pinduoduo Inc.

 

	
 

NAME AND ADDRESS
    	
 

CERTIFICATE NUMBER
    	
 

DISTINCTIVE NUMBERS
    	
 

PAR VALUE PER SHARE
    
	
OF SHAREHOLDER
    	
 
    	
 

FROM

 
    	
 

TO

 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
AO5
    	
 
    	
 
    	
USD 0.000005
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
DATE OF ISSUE
    	
NO. OF SHARES
    	
CONSIDERATION   PAID
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    


 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

 

SHARE CERTIFICATE

OF

Pinduoduo Inc.

INCORPORATED IN THE  CAYMAN ISLANDS

 

The authorised share capital of the Company is US$400,000 divided into 80,000,000,000 shares comprising of (i) 77,300,000,000  Class A Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.000005 each, (ii) 2,200,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.000005 each and (iii) 500,000,000 shares of a par value of US$0.000005 each of such class or classes (however designated) as the board of directors may determine in accordance with Article 9 of the Articles. Subject to the Companies Law and the Articles, the Company shall have power to redeem or purchase any of its Shares and to increase or reduce its authorised share capital and to sub-divide or consolidate the said Shares or any of them and to issue all or any part of its capital whether original, redeemed, increased or reduced with or without any preference, priority, special privilege or other rights or subject to any postponement of rights or to any conditions or restrictions whatsoever and so that unless the conditions of issue shall otherwise expressly provide every issue of shares whether stated to be ordinary, preference or otherwise shall be subject to the powers on the part of the Company hereinbefore provided.

 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE UNDERMENTIONED PERSON IS THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF THE SHARES SPECIFIED HEREUNDER SUBJECT TO THE RULES AND LAWS GOVERNING THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMPANY

 

	
SHAREHOLDER
    	
NO. OF

 

SHARES
    	
DISTINCTIVE   NUMBERS
    	
 

CERTIFICATE

 

NUMBER

 
    	
 

DATE OF

 

ISSUE

 
    
	
 

FROM

 
    	
 

TO

 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
AO5
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    


 

GIVEN UNDER THE COMMON SEAL OF THE COMPANY ON THE DATE STATED ABOVE AND IN THE PRESENCE OF

 

 

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    
	
DIRECTOR
    	
 
    


 

 

NO TRANSFER OF ANY OF THE ABOVE SHARES CAN BE REGISTERED UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY THIS CERTIFICATE
January 9, 2008

28054

#### State v. Dela Cruz

Affirmed
**EXHIBIT31.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James G. Thomasch, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC SystemsInc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b) [Not Applicable];

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
| Date: August 9, 2006 |   | /s/ James G. Thomasch   |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                 |   | James G. Thomasch       |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----