alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24
 
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned persons whose
signature appear immediately below, does hereby constitute and appoint Ronald D.
Hunter and Stephen M. Coons, each with full power to act alone, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign on behalf of the undersigned an Annual Report on Form 10-K
("Form 10-K") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary
to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agent, or his substitute lawfully do or cause to be done
by virtue hereof.
 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 29 day of August 1997.
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                    <C>
                /s/ RONALD D. HUNTER                                    /s/ PAUL B. PHEFFER
-----------------------------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------
                  Ronald D. Hunter                                        Paul B. Pheffer
 
              /s/ GERALD R. HOCHGESANG                                 /s/ RAYMOND J. OHLSON
-----------------------------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------
                Gerald R. Hochgesang                                     Raymond J. Ohlson
 
                 /s/ EDWARD T. STAHL                                   /s/ STEPHEN M. COONS
-----------------------------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------
                   Edward T. Stahl                                       Stephen M. Coons
 
               /s/ MARTIAL R. KNIESER                                   /s/ RAMESH H. BHAT
-----------------------------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------
                 Martial R. Knieser                                       Ramesh H. Bhat
 
                 /s/ JAMES C. LANSHE                                    /s/ ROBERT A. BORNS
-----------------------------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------
                   James C. Lanshe                                        Robert A. Borns
</TABLE>
September 10, 2004

25609

#### Moore & Moore v. Kepuhi Point Reef, LLC

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              May-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   Aug-31-2000
<CASH>                                              19,133
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      126,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                         8,372
<INVENTORY>                                         29,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   177,652
<PP&E>                                             622,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                     174,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,299,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              206,672
<BONDS>                                          1,620,854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               946
<OTHER-SE>                                         552,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,299,983
<SALES>                                            145,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   145,244
<CGS>                                               30,478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       67,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  41,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     36,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18,678
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 23,851
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        23,851
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.25



</TABLE>
#### State v. Sherman

22351

03/20/2000

Affirmed
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Gus D. Halas, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of T-3 EnergyServices, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (d) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (e) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         */*s/ GUS D. HALAS    Gus D. Halas    Chief Executive Officer
May 12, 2006

27143

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 184 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 184

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require the House 
             to meet 5 days a week for 39 weeks each year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2015

 Mr. Peters submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require the House 
             to meet 5 days a week for 39 weeks each year.

    Resolved, That (a) rule XIV of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
    ``7. There shall be votes held in the House or in the Committee of 
the Whole House on the State of the Union for 5 consecutive days each 
week except--
            ``(a) during any recess there shall be no votes, except 
        there shall be not more than 13 recess weeks during each 
        calendar year; or
            ``(b) during any week in which there is a holiday, then 
        votes shall be held on 4 days.''.
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect with the 
first session of Congress beginning on the date of adoption of this 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending June 30,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Michael T. Prior, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                       the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|                        | Atlantic  Tele-Network, Inc. |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                        |                              |   |
| Date:  August 11, 2008 | By:                     | /s/  Michael T. Prior |
|                        |                              | Michael  T. Prior |
|                        |                              | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income  Fund XII,  Ltd. at March 31,  2000,  and its  statement  of
income for the three  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference  to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund XII,  Ltd.  for the three  months
ended March 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         2,779,834<F2>
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                   54,912
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         23,211,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,223,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40,548,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     39,290,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,548,023
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,048,494
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  238,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,036,139
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,036,139
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,036,139
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>
Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd. has an unclassified
balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown  above for  current  assets and
current liabilities.
<F2>
Includes $790,250 in restricted cash.
</FN>




</TABLE>
#### RAY v. CARR.

No. 7324.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided Sept. 5, 1939.

Richard A. Harman, John G. Epaminonda, and Joseph L. Borda, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Sefton Darr and James O’D. Moran, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, VINSON, and RUTLEDGE, Associate Justices.

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

Appellant filed in the District Court his bill for an injunction against Edward M. Carr. The bill alleges that the defendant is clerk of the Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of the Municipal Court; that a judgment against appellant in that court was obtained without proper service of process upon appellant, and is therefore void; and that an attachment in aid of that judgment was served upon appellant’s employer. It does not appear that appellant exhausted his remedies in the Municipal Court by moving to vacate the judgment. The bill prays that defendant be restrained from issuing any attachment, garnishment, or execution for the enforcement of the judgment. There is also a prayer for damages. The District Court dismissed the bill.

Whether or not appellant was properly served with process in the suit against him, he cannot prevail in the present suit. He does not allege that he has any defense to the claim on which he was sued in the Municipal Court. Though the authorities are divided, the prevailing rule refuses, in the absence of such an allegation, to restrain the enforcement of void judgments, including judgments obtained without service.1 Stephens v. Bruce, 216 Ala. 677, 114 So. 306; Baskin v. Mosaic Templars of America, 176 Ark. 940, 4 S.W.2d 932; Fitzhugh v. Central Trust Co., 146 Kan. 585, 72 P.2d 959; Fowler v. Lee, 10 Gill & J., Md., 358, 364, 32 Am.Dec. 172; Braun v. Quinn, 112 Neb. 485, 199 N.W. 828, 39 A.L.R. 411; Barnhart v. Aiken, 39 Ohio App. 172, 177 N.E. 284; 1 Black, Judgments, 2d ed., Sec. 376. Cf. Reeves v. Slater, 36 App.D.C. 488, 492. Appellant apparently “claims only the barren right of being permitted to defend against a claim to which he had no defense.” Gre*239gory v. Ford, 14 Cal. 139, 142, 73 Am. Dec. 639, 641. As he seeks equity, he must do equity. Moreover appellant’s judgment creditor, the Regal Clothing Company, is not a party here. In the circumstances of this case, a bill by a judgment debtor to restrain the enforcement of a judgment cannot be maintained against an officer of the court as sole defendant; it must be brought against the owner of the judgment, for he is the real party in interest. Cf. McFarlin v. Camp, 150 Ga. 38, 102 S.E. 349; Harrison v. Wallton’s Executor, 95 Va. 721, 30 S.E. 372, 41 L.R.A. 703, 64 Am.St.Rep. 830. Ordinarily “the absence of the plaintiff in the original suit is a fatal defect.” Harwood v. Railroad Company, 17 Wall. 78, 84 U.S. 78, 81, 21 L.Ed. 558. Appellant complains that the Clothing Company’s rights against him were litigated in his absence, and at the same time seeks to litigate his rights against the Clothing Company in its absence.

Affirmed.

1

 Notes, 39 A.L.R. 414; 118 A.L.R. 1498.
TERRA NITROGEN COMPANY, L.P.

Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P. (the Company) for the period
ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony J. Nocchiero, Vice President of Terra Nitrogen GP Inc., the general
partner of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:



/s/ ANTHONY J. NOCCHIERO Anthony J. Nocchiero Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Terra Nitrogen GP Inc., general partner of Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P.
(Principal Financial Officer)


Dated:
August 6, 2010

37

---



QuickLinks
If you see signs of illness, take action right away! Phone Number

Veterinarian 

Cooperative Extension Office 

State Veterinarian/Animal or Poultry Diagnostic Lab 

USDA 866.536.7593

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Report Sick Birds
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:  November 10, 2003                /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                        Title: President and Treasurer

                                        A  signed   original  of  this   written
                                        statement  required  by Section  906 has
                                        been  provided  to CNL  Income  Fund XI,
                                        Ltd.  and will be retained by CNL Income
                                        Fund  XI,  Ltd.  and  furnished  to  the
                                        Securities  and Exchange  Commission  or
                                        its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Ben Blumenthal and Jack Friedberg, Defendants.

City Magistrates’ Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan,

June 12, 1959.

*Robert L. Graham, Jr.,*for Ben Blumenthal, defendant.

*Solomon Weiss*for Jack Friedberg, defendant.

Maurice E. Downing, M.

These two defendants are charged with a violation of section B32-127.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York in that they were engaged in selling second-hand articles without a required license from the Department of Licenses.

The defendant Blumenthal concedes that he does sell as a small part of his business cancelled postage stamps and defendant Friedberg that he does sell old coins as part of his business.

At the close of the trial the court reserved decision on separate motions to dismiss each complaint on the ground that such transactions were not intended by the lawmakers to be within the definition of “ second-hand articles.”

The court has carefully examined the statute and the exceptions recited therein and finds that it has no application to the transactions carried on by these defendants.

The motions to dismiss are therefore granted. Complaint dismissed in each case.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Blackburn, Appellant.

(No. 31744

Decided May 4, 1949.)

*555
      *Mr. Alva J. Russell,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Jackson B. Morris,*for appellee.

*Mr. Roy C. Blackburn, in propria persona.*

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of' right be, and the game hereby is, dismissed for the' reason that no debatable constitutional question is-involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Stewart, Turner: and Taft, JJ., concur.

Zimmerman, J., not participating.
United States Department of Agriculture
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Wildlife Services Directive

August 13, 2014

LOANING EQUIPMENT

1, PURPOSE

To provide guidelines for loaning program-owned equipment to cooperators and the public.

2. REPLACEMENT HIGHLIGHTS

This directive replaces Wildlife Services (WS) Directive 4.005 dated October 31, 2003.

3. POLICY

a. WS equipment may be loaned to cooperating organizations or private individuals at
the discretion of the Director or State Director.

b. WS personnel shall give verbal or written instructions on the safe and proper use of
loaned equipment, and alert the cooperator to potential hazards.

c. WS equipment may be loaned for any designated period of time that is appropriate to
resolve the problem. However, if the equipment is likely to be needed for an extended period of
time, individuals should be encouraged to acquire their own.

d. Foot-hold traps, snares and M-44 devices will not be loaned to the public.

4. IMPLEMENTATION
a. Loaned equipment must:

1) be legal for use by the public,
2) not pose an unreasonable safety or health hazard, and
3) be sufficiently durable to withstand use by the public.

b. Equipment loans shall be documented on a completed WS Form 24, Temporary
Assignment of Government Property to Private Individuals, or other appropriate written
document.


Wildlife Services Directive 4.165 page 2

c. Cooperators are expected to replace loaned equipment that is lost, damaged, or stolen.

5. APPLICABILITY

This directive applies to all employees of Wildlife Services.

Meat?

William H. Clay
Deputy Administrator
January 13, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DON MCCAFFETY, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00756-CV V.

JOYCE MCCAFFETY, ET AL, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on June 17, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Don McCaffety.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.