alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of the Treasury[, and] the Secretary of Energy

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, after carefully considering the reports submitted to the Congress by the Energy Information Administration, including the report submitted in October 2023, and other relevant factors, including global economic conditions, the level of spare capacity, and the availability of strategic reserves, I determine, pursuant to section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Public Law 112-81, and consistent with prior determinations, that there is a sufficient supply of petroleum and petroleum products from countries other than Iran to permit a significant reduction in the volume of petroleum and petroleum products purchased from Iran by or through foreign financial institutions.

I will continue to monitor this situation closely.

                        The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                         *Federal Register*.                    

[FR Doc. 2023-26130

Billing code 4710-10-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7737

DARRELL HENRY WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOE COAKLEY, Warden, Hazelton USP,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:18-cv-00046-FPS)

Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 17, 2020

Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell Henry Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darrell Henry Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Williams’ 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2241 (2018) petition in which he sought to challenge his sentence by way of the savings 

clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018). Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge his 

sentence in a traditional writ of habeas corpus pursuant to § 2241 if a § 2255 motion would 

be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. 

[Section] 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of a sentence 

when: (1) at the time of sentencing, settled law of this circuit or the Supreme 

Court established the legality of the sentence; (2) subsequent to the prisoner’s 

direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the aforementioned settled substantive 

law changed and was deemed to apply retroactively on collateral review; 

(3) the prisoner is unable to meet the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255(h)(2) 

for second or successive motions; and (4) due to this retroactive change, the 

sentence now presents an error sufficiently grave to be deemed a fundamental 

defect.

United States v. Wheeler, 886 F.3d 415, 429 (4th Cir. 2018). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although 

we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Williams v. Coakley, No. 5:18-cv-00046-FPS (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 29, 2019). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply11783Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Julie Williamson (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 8, 2022 - 11:23amDennis, thank you for sharing your story. By pulling back the curtain you are giving hope to so many who may feel like they are alone in their pain. Thank you for caring.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**EXHIBIT 23**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements onForm S-3 and the related Prospectuses and in the following Registration Statements on Form S-8 of Centex Corporation and Subsidiaries:       Form S-3 Registration No. 333-49966 Form S-8 Registration No. 33-55083 Registration No. 333-49966-01   Registration No. 33-55083-01 Registration No. 333-49966-02   Registration No. 33-55083-02 Registration No. 333-49966-03   Registration No. 333-28229 Registration No. 333-49966-04   Registration No. 333-28229-01 Registration No. 333-54722   Registration No. 333-28229-02 Registration No. 333-54722-01   Registration No. 333-55717 Registration No. 333-54722-02   Registration No. 333-55717-01 Registration No. 333-83212   Registration No. 333-55717-02 Registration No. 333-83212-01   Registration No. 333-74185 Registration No. 333-83212-02   Registration No. 333-74185-01 Registration No. 333-83212-03   Registration No. 333-74185-02 Registration No. 333-83212-04   Registration No. 333-86041 Registration No. 333-117470   Registration No. 333-86041-01 Registration No. 333-117470-01   Registration No. 333-86041-02 Registration No. 333-117470-02   Registration No. 333-37956 Registration No. 333-122355   Registration No. 333-68790     Registration No. 333-68790-01     Registration No. 333-68790-02     Registration No. 333-100682     Registration No. 333-100682-01     Registration No. 333-100682-02     Registration No. 333-103440     Registration No. 333-103440-01     Registration No. 333-103440-02     Registration No. 333-107701     Registration No. 333-107701-01     Registration No. 333-107701-02     Registration No. 333-109869     Registration No. 333-109869-01     Registration No. 333-109869-02     Registration No. 333-110269     Registration No. 333-110269-01     Registration No. 333-110269-02     Registration No. 33-44575
of our reports dated May 26, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofCentex Corporation and Subsidiaries,Centex Corporation and Subsidiaries management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of CentexCorporation and Subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2005.
**Exhibit31.2**

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

I,Mark E. Ashdown, Chief Financial Officer of DynTek Inc. certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March31, 2007 of DynTek, Inc.;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 21, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ Mark E. Ashdown     |   |
|--------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|               |   |   | Mark E. Ashdown         |   |
|               |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
#### State v. Ah Mau

17413

5/30/96

Affirmed
#### State v. Jim

25513

09/02/2004

Denied

105 Hawai'i 319, 97 P.3d 395
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 943 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the requirement 

for employer disclosure of information on health care coverage of employees who are Medicare beneficiaries, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mr. LEWIS (for himself and Mr. REICHERT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal 

the requirement for employer disclosure of information 

on health care coverage of employees who are Medicare 

beneficiaries, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Employer 

5 Relief Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 943 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEALING SECTION 1862(b)(5) OF THE SOCIAL SE2 CURITY ACT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1862(b) of the Social Se4 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(b)) is amended by striking 

5 paragraph (5). 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact8 ment of this Act and shall apply to information required 

9 to be provided on or after January 1, 2016. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1996
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         642,886
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  389,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,032,096
<PP&E>                                      17,587,240
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,519,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,099,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,099,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,099,994
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,648,740
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,062,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   647,151
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
26322

#### Galdeira v. Student Transp., Inc.

Affirmed
WhatDotheClocksSay?
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the filing by Applied Energetics, Inc. (the “company”) of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
(the “Report”) I, Humberto A. Astorga, Principal Accounting Officer of the
company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(i)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(ii)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      company.




This
certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
Accounting Officer of Applied Energetics, Inc. with the requirements of Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other
purposes. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Applied Energetics, Inc. and will be retained by Applied
Energetics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.




/s/ Humberto A.
      AstorgaHumberto
      A. AstorgaPrincipal
      Accounting Officer





Date:  November
9, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|Date:             |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|November 21, 2005 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

FOIA Logs

Last Modified: 

Print

Did you know that APHIS receives hundreds of FOIA requests each year? To find

information about the FOIA requests APHIS has received in the past 5 years, you can

review our monthly FOIA logs below. The FOIA logs include the identification

number, requester name and organization, request description, and received date

for each request. For more information about a request listed in the FOIA Logs or to

obtain older FOIA logs, visit How To Submit a FOIA Request.  

2024

February (154.42 KB)

January (244.84 KB)

2023

December (2.69 MB)

November (3.16 MB)

October (230.53 KB)
September (943.48 KB)

August (362.82 KB)

July (1.33 MB)

June (968.73 KB)

May (989.58 KB)

April (175.42 KB)

March (826.17 KB)

February (817.33 KB)

January (866.45 KB)

2022

December (809.73 KB)

November (805.97 KB)

October (310.07 KB)

September (1.03 MB)

August (1003.19 KB)

July (972.54 KB)
June (984.73 KB)

May (1.12 MB)

April (895.5 KB)

March (818.24 KB)

February (858.59 KB)

January (813.05 KB)

2021

December (239.39 KB)

November (573.42 KB)

October (160.03 KB)

September (273.85 KB)

August (405.97 KB)

July (370.12 KB)

June (394.01 KB)

May (285.65 KB)

April (312.72 KB)
March (227.71 KB)

February (321.27 KB)

January (243.4 KB)

2020

December (272.98 KB)

November (836.65 KB)

October (802.22 KB)

September (315.86 KB)

August (300.92 KB)

July (224.4 KB)

June (392.06 KB)

May (255.82 KB)

April (299.31 KB)

March (348.16 KB)

February (268.49 KB)

January  (299.65 KB)
2019

December (309.68 KB)

November (263.14 KB)

October (293.75 KB)

September (342.76 KB)

August (330.84 KB)

July (262.16 KB)

June (1.03 MB)

May (472.14 KB)

April (254.2 KB)

March (314.32 KB)

February (548.41 KB)

January (227.87 KB)

Related Links

How to Submit a Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Request
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7898

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROY STEVE DAVIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-89-407-A; CA-05-1209-1) Submitted: February 10, 2006 Decided: March 6, 2006 Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Vacated by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roy Steve Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Owen Matthew Kendler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Roy Steve Davis mailed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. While Davis directed his motion to this court, the district court improperly docketed the motion as one in that court under § 2255. The district court then entered an order construing the motion as one seeking authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion and denied it. Davis timely appealed. Under § 2244, a motion seeking authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion “shall be determined by a three-judge panel of the court of appeals.” § 2244(b)(3)(B).Because Davis clearly sought authorization from this court under § 2244, the district court lacked jurisdiction to act on it. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order. By separate order entered this day, we direct that Davis’ § 2244 motion be filed and docketed in this court. We will then review and act on the motion in due course. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order. We deny Davis’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. VACATED