##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)



---



|x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005

OR



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commission File Number: 0-25629



---

CARROLS CORPORATION

(Exact name of
Registrant as specified in its charter)



---



|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                       |  | 16-0958146                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|                                                               | 
|968 James Street Syracuse, New York                            |  | 13203                               
|(Address of principal executive office)                        |  | (Zip Code)                          

Registrants telephone number, including area code: (315) 424-0513



---

Securities registered pursuant
to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None



---

Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes ̈No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  x    No ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes ̈No  x

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ̈Accelerated filer ̈Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)    Yes ̈No  x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as of July 19, 2005 is 10.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED
BY REFERENCE

None



---



---

##### Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Form 10-K/A) is being filed as Amendment No. 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005 (2004 Form 10-K), which
was originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on July 29, 2005. We are filing this Form 10-K/A to restate our consolidated financial statements for the 2004, 2003 and 2002 fiscal years to:
(1) correct our accounting for the depreciation of assets and recording of interest expense associated with sale-leaseback transactions accounted for under the financing method; (2) record twelve real estate transactions as financing
transactions as required under SFAS No. 98 rather than as sale-leaseback transactions as previously reported; (3) correct deferred taxes associated with certain previously acquired long-lived assets and liabilities; (4) record
proceeds from qualifying sale-leaseback transactions as an investing activity in the statements of cash flows rather than as a financing activity as previously reported; and (5) reflect the impact of changes in accounts payable related to the
acquisition of property, plant and equipment as a non-cash item in the statements of cash flows.

Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements in this Form 10-K/A for additional information on these current restatements.

This Form 10-K/A amends and restates
only certain information in the following sections as a result of the current restatements described above:

Part I Introductory
Paragraphs and Item 1. Business;

Part IIItem 6. Selected Financial Data;

Part IIItem 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations;

Part IIItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data;

Part IIItem 9A. Controls & Procedures; and

Part IIIItem 15. Exhibits and
Financial Statement Schedules.

In addition, we are also including currently dated Sarbanes Oxley Act Section 302 and Section 906
certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that are attached to this Form 10-K/A as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2.

For the convenience of the reader, this Form 10-K/A sets forth the entire Form 2004 10-K. However, this Form 10-K/A only amends and restates the Items described above to reflect the effects of the restatement and no
attempt has been made to modify or update other disclosures presented in our 2004 Form 10-K. Accordingly, except for the foregoing amended information, this Form 10-K/A continues to speak as of July 29, 2005 (the original filing date of the
2004 Form 10-K), and does not reflect events occurring after the filing of our 2004 Form 10-K and does not modify or update those disclosures affected by subsequent events. Forward looking statements made in the 2004 Form 10-K have not been revised
to reflect events, results or developments that have become known to us after the date of the original filing (other than the current restatements described above), and such forward looking statements should be read in their historical context.
Unless otherwise stated, the information in this Form 10-K/A not affected by such current restatements is unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time of the original filing.

Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, we refer to Carrols Corporation, a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1968, as Carrols and,
together, with its consolidated operations, as we, our and us unless otherwise indicated. Any reference to Carrols Holdings or Holdings refers to our sole stockholder and corporate parent,
Carrols Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation, unless otherwise indicated.

We use a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Sunday
closest to December 31. For convenience, all references herein to the fiscal years ended December 29, 2002, December 28, 2003 and January 2, 2005 will hereinafter be referred to as the fiscal years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Our fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 contained 53 weeks. Our fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 each contained 52 weeks.

We use the terms Segment EBITDA and Segment EBITDA margin in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A because we believe they are
useful financial indicators for measuring segment operating results. Segment EBITDA may not be necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to differences in methods of calculation.



1



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I

This 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A contains statements which constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Statements that are predictive in nature or that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions are forward-looking statements. These statements are often identified by the words may,
might, will, should, anticipate, believe, expect, intend, estimate, hope or similar expressions. In addition, expressions of our strategies,
intentions or plans are also forward looking statements. These statements reflect managements current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown. You are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their date. There are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements, many of which are beyond our control.
Investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We
have identified significant factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated or implied in the forward-looking statements. For more information, please see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsRisk Factors. We believe important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include the following, in addition to other risks and uncertainties discussed
herein:



| |  |  | Competitive conditions;
| | - |  | -----------------------



| |  |  | Regulatory factors;
| | - |  | -------------------



| |  |  | Environmental conditions and regulations;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------



| |  |  | General economic conditions, particularly at the retail level;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Weather conditions;
| | - |  | -------------------



| |  |  | Fuel prices;
| | - |  | ------------



| |  |  | Significant disruptions in service or supply by any of our suppliers or distributors;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Labor and employment benefit costs;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------



| |  |  | The outcome of pending or yet-to-be instituted legal proceedings;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Our ability to manage our growth and successfully implement our business strategy;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The risks associated with the expansion of our business;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | General risks associated with the restaurant industry;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Our inability to integrate any businesses we acquire;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Our borrowing costs and credit ratings, which may be influenced by the credit ratings of our competitors;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The availability and terms of necessary or desirable financing or refinancing and other related risks and uncertainties;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The risk of events similar to those of September 11, 2001 or an outbreak or escalation of any insurrection or armed conflict involving the United States or any other national
or international calamity; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Factors that affect the restaurant industry generally, including recalls if products become adulterated or misbranded, liability if product consumption causes injury, ingredient
disclosure and labeling laws and regulations and the possibility that consumers could lose confidence in the safety and quality of certain food products, as well as recent publicity concerning the health implications of obesity and transfatty acids
and other risks and uncertainties that are discussed herein.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, we refer to information,
forecasts and statistics regarding the restaurant industry. Unless otherwise indicated, all restaurant industry data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A refers to the U.S. restaurant industry and is taken from or based upon the Technomic
Information Services (Technomic) 2005 report entitled 2005 Technomic Top 500 Chain Restaurant Report. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A we also refer to information, forecasts and statistics from the U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Bureau of
Labor Statistics and Burger King Corporation, or BKC.



2



---

##### Table of Contents

Unless otherwise indicated, information regarding BKC in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A has been made publicly available by BKC. We believe that all of
these sources are reliable, but we have not independently verified any of this information and cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. The information and statistics we have used from Technomic reflect rounding adjustments.

Restatements

Current Restatement

Lease Financing Obligations

We reviewed our
accounting with respect to the depreciation of assets and recording of interest expense associated with lease financing obligations related to sale-leaseback transactions required to be accounted for under the financing method. Under the financing
method, the assets subject to these obligations remain on the consolidated balance sheet at their historical costs and continue to be depreciated over their useful lives; the proceeds we received from the transaction are recorded as a lease
financing obligation and the lease payments are applied as payments of principal and/or interest.

We previously considered the land and
building as a single asset and depreciated this asset (both land and building) over a depreciable life that was deemed to be the 20-year primary lease term of the underlying obligation. We have concluded that our prior accounting was in error
and that the portion of the asset representing land should not be depreciated and the depreciation of the building portion of this asset should continue using its original estimated useful life rather than the term of the underlying obligation. The
effect of this restatement resulted in a reduction of depreciation expense of $2.0 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and an increase to net income of $1.2 million, $1.2 million and $1.4 million in 2004, 2003
and 2002, respectively.

Historically, we allocated the related lease payments between interest and principal using an interest rate that
would fully amortize the lease financing obligation by the end of the primary lease term. Due to the change in depreciation described above, the assets subject to the lease financing obligations will have a net book value at the end of the primary
lease term, primarily for the land portion. To prevent the recognition of a non-cash loss or negative amortization of the obligation through the end of the primary lease term, it was necessary to reevaluate the selection of interest rates,
which included our incremental borrowing rate, and to adjust the rates used to amortize the lease financing obligations so that a lease obligation equal to or greater than the unamortized asset remained at the end of the primary lease term. The
effect of this restatement resulted in an increase in interest expense and decrease in net income related to the lease financing obligations of $2.7 million and $1.7 million in 2004, $2.5 million and $1.5 million in 2003 and $2.3 million and $1.1
million in 2002, respectively.

These restatements also resulted in an increase in the land and buildings subject to lease financing
obligations of $11.4 million and an increase in lease financing obligations of $14.6 million at December 31, 2004.

We also reviewed
previously reported sale-leaseback transactions and determined twelve additional real estate transactions were required to be recorded as financing transactions under SFAS No. 98 Accounting for Leases (SFAS No. 98)
due to certain forms of continuing involvement. The impact of this restatement is to keep the assets subject to such leases on the Companys balance sheet and to record the proceeds we received from these transactions (including the gains
previously deferred) as lease financing obligations. This restatement also affects our operating results by increasing the depreciation expense for buildings subject to these transactions and recharacterizing the lease payments, previously reported
as rent expense for these restaurants, as interest expense and principal repayments on the related financing obligations.

The effect of
this restatement (a) for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was to (i) reduce rent expense, by $1.1 million, $0.6 million, and $0.3 million, respectively; (ii) increase depreciation expense by $0.4 million, $0.2
million and $0.1 million, respectively and (iii) increase interest expense by $1.3 million, $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively; (iv) reduce net income by $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively; and (b) at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, to (i) increase the net book value of the land and buildings subject to lease financing obligations by $9.5 million and $6.6 million, respectively, (ii) reduce deferred income-sale/leaseback of real estate
by $3.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and (iii) increase lease financing obligations by $14.7 million and $10.2 million, respectively.

The net effect of the above current restatements was to decrease net income $0.9 million, $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Deferred Taxes

We also reviewed deferred taxes
recorded for certain long-lived assets and liabilities that were previously acquired in business combinations and the related differences between the income tax bases and the financial reporting bases of these assets and liabilities and determined
that the deferred taxes recorded at the acquisition dates were incorrect. The result of these restatements was to decrease goodwill and deferred tax liabilities by $2.1 million in the aggregate related to our 2000 acquisition of Taco Cabana and to
increase goodwill and deferred tax liabilities by $0.6 million related to our 1998 acquisition of Pollo Tropical. This restatement also cumulatively decreased goodwill amortization expense $0.1 million for periods prior to 2002.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

Statements of Cash Flows

The Company has corrected its previously issued financial statements to reflect the proceeds from qualifying sale-leaseback transactions within investing activities rather than as financing activities as previously
reported in the statements of cash flows. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, proceeds from qualifying sale-leaseback transactions included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements were $11.0 million, $44.2
million and $8.4 million, respectively. We have also restated our consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 to reflect the impact of changes in accounts payable related to the acquisition of
property and equipment as a non-cash item as required under SFAS No. 95.

See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
elsewhere in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for a complete discussion of the restatements, Selected Financial Data and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Amounts
affected by these restatements that appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A have also been restated.

Previous Restatement

Lease and Leasehold Improvement Accounting

We
reviewed our lease accounting policies following a host of announcements by many restaurant and retail companies that they were revising their accounting practices for leases. We historically followed the accounting practice of using the initial
lease term when determining operating versus capital lease classification and when calculating straight-line rent expense. In addition, we depreciated our buildings on leased land and leasehold improvements over a period that included both the
initial lease term plus one or more optional extension periods even if the option renewal was not reasonably assured (or the useful life of the asset if shorter).

Upon such review, we restated our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the unaudited quarterly financial information for 2003 and the first three quarters of 2004 to correct
errors in our lease accounting. Specifically, we revised our lease term for purposes of lease classification and calculating straight-line rent expense to only include renewal options that are reasonably assured of exercise because an economic
penalty, as defined under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for Leases, (SFAS 13) would be incurred in the event of non-renewal. We also revised our useful lives of leasehold improvements to
the shorter of their economic lives or the lease term as defined in SFAS 13. The primary impact of the restatement was to accelerate depreciation of buildings on leased land and leasehold improvements made subsequent to the lease inception date. The
restatement also reduced the lives of intangible assets related to leases. The aggregate effect of these adjustments at December 31, 2004 was a reduction of the net book value of leasehold improvements of $13.8 million and a reduction of the
net book value of intangible assets related to leases of $3.8 million.

In conjunction with the review of our lease accounting, we also
determined that adjustments were also necessary to lease liabilities for operating leases with non-level rents at the time of our acquisitions of Pollo Tropical in 1998 and Taco Cabana in 2000 as well as liabilities related to acquired leases with
above-market rentals for Taco Cabana. We have adjusted our purchase price allocations for these acquisitions and restated lease liabilities and goodwill as of the acquisition dates. We have also restated rent expense and interest expense for those
previously reported periods subsequent to each acquisition and restated goodwill amortization through December 31, 2001.

As a result
of these restatements rent expense increased $0.1 million in the first nine months of 2004, $0.3 million in 2003 and $0.7 million in 2002.

Accounting
for Franchise Rights

During the current year, we also reviewed our accounting policies for the amortization of franchise rights,
intangible assets pertaining to our acquisitions of Burger King restaurants, and determined that we made an error in the assessment of their remaining useful lives, as part of our adoption of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, (SFAS 142). As of January 1, 2002, amounts allocated to franchise rights for each acquisition are now amortized prospectively from that date using the straight-line method over the remaining average term of the
acquired franchise agreements at January 1, 2002, plus one twenty-year renewal period. Previously, we amortized the amounts allocated to franchise rights over periods ranging from twenty to forty years.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

In connection with the review of our accounting for franchise rights, we also determined that we
understated the franchise rights and deferred tax liabilities each by $14.0 million that pertained to an acquisition of 64 Burger King restaurants in 1997.

We have restated our financial statements for these adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the unaudited quarterly financial information for 2003 and the first three quarters of 2004. The
effect of the restatement was a reduction in amortization expense of $0.5 million for the first three quarters of 2004 and $0.8 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

Stock-based Compensation Expense

We reevaluated the
terms of our option plans and grants and concluded that provisions of certain options granted under our plans require us to account for these options using the variable accounting provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, (APB 25). Previously, we had accounted for these options under APB 25 using a fixed accounting treatment whereby compensation expense, if any, was only evaluated at the date of the
option grant. The most significant impact of this adjustment was to increase stock-based compensation expense, included in general and administrative expenses, by $2.2 million in the first nine months of 2004.

Accounting for Guarantor Financial Statements

In
addition, we have restated our financial statements to correct the disclosure related to the Company and its subsidiaries who guarantee certain of the Companys securities as of December 31, 2003 and for the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2002 to reflect the allocation of corporate costs and in addition, for the year ended December 31, 2003, the calculation of income tax expense applicable to the Guarantor Subsidiaries. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Summary Overview

Our Company

We are
one of the largest restaurant companies in the United States operating three restaurant brands in the quick-casual and quick-service restaurant segments with 537 company owned and operated restaurants in 17 states as of December 31, 2004. We
own, operate and franchise two Hispanic restaurant brands, Taco Cabana®and Pollo
Tropical®(together referred to by us as our Hispanic Brands) operating primarily in Texas
and Florida, respectively. We are also the largest Burger King®franchisee and have
operated Burger King restaurants since 1976. We believe that the diversification of our restaurant concepts and geographic dispersion of our restaurants provide us with balance and stability. For the year ended December 31, 2004 we had total
revenues of $697.9 million.

December 2004 Refinancing

On December 15, 2004, we completed the private placement of $180.0 million of our 9% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013, which we refer to as the notes. Concurrently, we repaid all outstanding
borrowings under our prior senior secured credit facility and amended and restated such senior credit facility with a new syndicate of lenders, which we refer to as the new senior credit facility. We received $400.0 million in total
proceeds that included the issuance of the 9% senior subordinated notes and term loan B borrowings of $220.0 million under the new senior credit facility. The proceeds were primarily utilized to repay borrowings outstanding under the prior senior
credit facility of $74.4 million, to retire all of our 91/2% senior subordinated notes due 2008 (including
redemption premiums) in the amount of $175.9 million, to pay a dividend to Holdings, our sole stockholder, in the amount of $116.8 million (and Holdings concurrently paid a dividend to its stockholders in the aggregate amount of $116.8 million), to
pay fees and expenses related to the refinancing of $8.8 million, and to pay a bonus to employees (including management) and a director, who owned options to purchase common stock of Holdings, totaling $20.9 million, which includes $0.6 million of
payroll taxes. We also recorded an $8.9 million loss on early extinguishment of debt primarily from the write-off of previously deferred financing costs and premiums in conjunction with the retirement of the 91/2% senior subordinated notes.



5



---

##### Table of Contents

Hispanic Brands

We acquired Pollo Tropical, Inc. in July 1998 and acquired Taco Cabana, Inc. in December 2000. Our Hispanic Brands combine the convenience of quick-service restaurants with the menu variety, use of fresh ingredients,
upscale decor and food quality of casual dining. As of December 31, 2004, our Hispanic Brands were comprised of 189 company-owned and 31 franchised restaurants and accounted for 47.0% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Due primarily to the acquisition of Taco Cabana in late 2000, total revenues for our Hispanic brands have increased from $95.6 million in 2000 to $328.0 million in 2004. During this time frame total combined segment EBITDA for our two Hispanic Brand
segments has increased from $21.7 million in 2000 to $58.0 million in 2004.

Taco Cabana

Taco Cabana restaurants combine fresh, high-quality Tex-Mex and traditional Mexican style food in a festive setting with the convenience and value of
quick-service restaurants. Menu items include sizzling fajitas, quesadillas, enchiladas, other Tex-Mex dishes, fresh-made flour tortillas, frozen margaritas and beer. Most menu items are made fresh daily in each of our Taco Cabana restaurants. Taco
Cabana pioneered the Mexican patio café concept with its first restaurant in San Antonio, Texas in 1978. As of December 31, 2004, we owned and operated 126 Taco Cabana restaurants located in Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico and franchised
seven Taco Cabana restaurants in Texas, New Mexico and Georgia. For the year ended December 31, 2004, Taco Cabana generated total revenues of $202.9 million and segment EBITDA of $30.1 million. In addition, for 2004, our company- owned Taco
Cabana restaurants generated average annual sales per restaurant of $1.6 million, which we believe is among the highest in the quick-casual segment, and average segment EBITDA per restaurant of $243,000.

Pollo Tropical

Pollo Tropical
restaurants combine high quality distinctive menu items and an inviting tropical setting with the convenience and value of quick-service restaurants. Our Pollo Tropical restaurants feature fresh grilled chicken marinated in a proprietary blend of
tropical fruit juices and spices and authentic made from scratch side dishes. Our menu also features other items including roast pork, a line of premium sandwiches and grilled ribs offered with a selection of sauces. Most menu items are
made fresh daily in each of our Pollo Tropical restaurants. Pollo Tropical opened its first company-owned restaurant in 1988 in Miami. As of December 31, 2004, we owned and operated a total of 63 Pollo Tropical restaurants, 54 of which were
located in south Florida and nine of which are located in central Florida. We also franchised 24 Pollo Tropical restaurants as of December 31, 2004, 20 of which were located in Puerto Rico, three in Ecuador and one in Miami. Since our
acquisition of Pollo Tropical, we have expanded the brand by 75% by opening 27 new restaurants. For the year ended December 31, 2004, our company-owned Pollo Tropical restaurants generated total revenues of $125.1 million and segment EBITDA of
$27.9 million. In addition, for 2004, our company-owned Pollo Tropical restaurants generated average annual sales per restaurant of $2.0 million, which we believe is among the highest in the quick-casual segment, and average segment EBITDA per
restaurant of $463,000.

Burger King

Burger King is one of the largest hamburger restaurant chains in the world and we are the largest Burger King franchisee. Burger King restaurants feature the popular flame-broiled WHOPPER®sandwich as well as hamburgers and other sandwiches, fries, salads, breakfast items and other
offerings typically found in quick-service hamburger restaurants. As of December 31, 2004, we operated 348 Burger King restaurants located in 13 Northeastern, Midwestern and Southeastern states. For the year ended December 31, 2004, our
Burger King restaurants generated total revenues of $369.8 million and segment EBITDA of $36.6 million. In addition, for 2004, our Burger King restaurants generated average annual sales per restaurant of $1.0 million and average segment EBITDA per
restaurant of $104,000.

Industry

The Restaurant Market

According to Technomic, total restaurant industry revenues in the United States for 2004 were $313.7
billion, an increase of 7.2% over 2003. Technomic indicates that the U.S. restaurant industry is comprised of five major segments: quick-service, quick-casual, family/mid-scale, casual dining and fine dining restaurants. Sales in the overall U. S.
restaurant industry are projected by Technomic to increase at a compound annual growth rate of 5.6% between 2004 and 2009.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

Quick-Casual Restaurants

Our Hispanic Brands are part of the quick-casual restaurant segment, which combines the convenience of quick-service restaurants with the menu variety,
use of fresh ingredients, upscale decor and food quality of casual dining. We believe that the quick-casual restaurant segment is one of the fastest growing segments of the restaurant industry. According to Technomic, sales growth in 2004 of
quick-casual chains in the Top 500 restaurant chains was 12.8% as compared to 7.9% for the overall Top 500 restaurant chains, which includes all five major segments.

Quick-casual restaurants are primarily distinguished by the following characteristics:



| |  |  | Quick-service or self-service format. Meals are purchased prior to receiving food. In some cases, payment may be made at a separate station from where the order was placed.
Also, servers may bring orders to the customers table.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Check averages between $7 and $10. Technomic reports that the average check at quick-casual restaurants in 2004 was between $7 and $10. This positions quick-casual
restaurants between traditional quick-service and casual dining in terms of pricing.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Food prepared to-order. Cooking platforms often feature last-minute preparation or assembly. We believe that in quick-casual concepts, customization of orders is generally
allowed and often encouraged. Display cooking is also common.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Fresh ingredients. Many concepts use the word fresh in their concept positioning and feature very descriptive menus highlighting these upgraded components.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Innovative food suited to sophisticated tastes. Many quick-casual concepts feature foods that have complex flavor profiles and use distinctive ingredient combinations in
order to distinguish their menus from more traditional fast food.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Upscale or highly developed decor. Wooden tables, upholstered seating and track lighting are some of the design features commonly found in quick-casual establishments.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We believe that our Hispanic Brands will benefit from the growing baby boomer demand for quick-casual dining and the
increasing consumer demand for, and acceptance of, variety and ethnic foods. We also believe that our Hispanic Brands will benefit from the relatively higher population growth rates in regions in which our restaurants are currently located.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

Our Burger King restaurants are part of the quick-service restaurant segment that Technomic indicates is
the largest of the five major segments of the U.S. restaurant chain industry. Technomic identifies nine major types of restaurants comprising the quick-service segment: hamburger; pizza/pasta; chicken; other sandwich; Mexican; ice cream/yogurt;
donut and cafeteria/buffet and family steak. According to Technomic, the quick-service restaurants included in the Top 100 quick-service restaurant chains in 2004 were divided by menu category as follows:

LOGO

According to Technomic, sales at all quick-service restaurants in the United States were $159.6 billion in
2004, representing 51% of total U.S. restaurant industry sales. Sales in this segment are projected by Technomic to increase at a compound annual growth rate of 5.4% between 2004 and 2009.

Quick-service restaurants are distinguished by the following characteristics:



| |  |  | High speed of service and customer use. It is estimated that a customer of a typical quick-service restaurant will spend no more than 20 minutes on the total quick-service
restaurant experience from the time of ordering to departure.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Convenience. Quick-service restaurants are typically located in places that are easily accessed and convenient to customers homes, places of work and commuter routes.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Limited menu choice and service. The menus at most quick-service restaurants have a limited number of standardized items. Typically, customers order at a counter or drive
thru and pick up food that then is taken to a seating area or consumed off the restaurant premises.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Value prices. At quick-service restaurants, according to Technomic, the average expenditure for an individual meal in 2003 was approximately $4 to $6.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We believe that the quick-service restaurant segment meets consumers desire for a convenient, reasonably priced
restaurant experience. In addition, we believe that the consumers need for meals prepared outside of the home, including takeout, has increased significantly over historical levels as a result of the greater numbers of working women and single
parent families. For example, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the percentage of mothers with children under age six participating in the workforce has increased from 39% in 1975 to 64% in 2002. According to the U.S. Census Bureau,
the number of children living in households with two parents has decreased from 80% to 69% over the same period.

Our Burger King
restaurants operate in the hamburger segment of the quick-service restaurant segment. The hamburger segment of the quick-service restaurant segment in the United States, which generated $54.2 billion in sales in 2004, is the largest segment of the
quick-service restaurant segment in the United States according to Technomic. Sales in this segment are projected by Technomic to increase at a compound annual growth rate of 5.0% between 2004 and 2009.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

Competitive Strengths

We believe the following strengths differentiate us from our competitors:

Strong Brand Names. We
believe our restaurant concepts are highly recognized brands in their market areas.

Hispanic Brands: Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical
are highly recognized brands in their market areas. We believe that the following factors have contributed to the success of our Hispanic Brands:



| |  |  | strong brand loyalty and awareness in their respective core markets;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | distinctive menu offerings that appeal to a broad and growing consumer base that we believe prefers food variety and different flavor profiles;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | high quality, freshly prepared food at attractive prices that provide consumers with convenience and value;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | concentrated store locations that enhance visibility and recognition and result in operating and marketing efficiencies;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | ability to effectively manage brand awareness, marketing and product development; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | high frequency of visits by our customers;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------

Burger
King: Since its introduction in 1954, the Burger King brand has become one of the most recognized brands in the restaurant industry. Each year Burger King spends between 4% and 5% of total system sales on advertising (a total of approximately
$2.3 billion over the past five years) to sustain and increase this high brand awareness. We believe that strong brand recognition, combined with food quality, value and convenience of Burger King restaurants; provide stability and potential growth
for the Burger King brand.

Stable and Diversified Cash Flows. We believe that the stability of our operating cash flows is due to
the proven success of our quick-casual and quick-service restaurant concepts, the high degree of customer awareness of our brands and our consistent focus on efficient and effective restaurant operations. Over the past five years, net cash provided
from operating activities has ranged from $46.3 million to $59.2 million and averaged $51.2 million. We also believe that multiple concepts operating in diverse geographic areas enable us to capitalize on regions that have rapidly growing
populations and to further reduce our dependence on the economic performance of any one particular region or restaurant concept. Taco Cabana, with its quick-casual restaurants primarily located in Texas, and Pollo Tropical, with its quick-casual
restaurants primarily located in Florida, have provided us with geographic, brand and concept diversity. In addition, our Burger King restaurants are geographically dispersed over 13 states in the Northeast, Southeast and Midwest regions.

Well Positioned to Continue to Capitalize on the Growing Population in Core Markets Served by Our Hispanic Brands. As of
December 31, 2004, we collectively owned and operated or franchised more than 200 restaurants under our Hispanic Brands. Our Hispanic Brand restaurants operate primarily in Texas and Florida, two markets experiencing significant population
growth. We expect sales from these restaurants to benefit from the continued population growth in these regions and from the growth of the U.S. Hispanic population, both of which are projected by the U.S. Census Bureau to exceed the national
average. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the U.S. population is forecast to grow by 4.1% from 2005 to 2010 and the population in Texas and Florida is forecast to grow by 6.4% and 6.7%, respectively, during that same period. In addition, the
growth of the Hispanic population is projected to outpace overall population growth and increase from 11.8% of the total U.S. population in 2000 to 18.2% by 2025.

Largest Burger King Franchisee. We are Burger Kings largest franchisee and are well positioned to leverage the scale and marketing power of one of the most recognized brands in the restaurant industry. We
believe that the quick-service hamburger restaurant segment is positioned to meet consumers desire for a convenient, reasonably priced restaurant experience. We believe that our experienced management team, effective management information
systems, and a comprehensive infrastructure enable us to operate more efficiently and better enhance restaurant margins and overall performance levels than most other Burger King franchisees. These strengths also enable us to selectively acquire
additional Burger King restaurants, continue to develop new restaurants and leverage this expertise across our Hispanic Brands.

Experienced Management Team. Our senior management has extensive experience in the restaurant industry and has a long and successful history of developing, acquiring and operating quick-service and quick-casual restaurants.
Management has successfully integrated the acquisitions of Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical. We believe that our senior management teams experience in operating restaurants and knowledge of the demographic and other characteristics of our core
markets provide us with a competitive advantage.



9



---

##### Table of Contents

Business Strategy

Our business strategy is to continue to increase revenues and cash flows through the development of new restaurants. Our business strategy also includes improvements in sales and profitability at our existing
restaurants through our new product offerings and effective marketing activities and through our operating efficiencies as a result of our training and management information systems. We may also pursue opportunities to expand our Hispanic Brands in
additional markets with demographics that are similar to the demographics of our existing markets:

Our strategy is based on our ability to
leverage our strong brand names. We realize significant benefits as an owner and operator of the Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical restaurant concepts and as a Burger King franchisee. These benefits are the result of the following:



| |  |  | strong recognition of the Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical brands in their core markets;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | ability to effectively manage brand awareness, marketing and product development for our Hispanic Brands;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | widespread recognition of the Burger King brand and flagship WHOPPER®product supported by a national advertising program; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | ability to capitalize on Burger Kings new product development capabilities.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Open Additional Restaurants. We believe that many of our existing markets continue to provide opportunities for the development of new Taco Cabana, Pollo Tropical and, to a lesser extent, Burger King
restaurants. Our staff of real estate and development professionals is responsible for new restaurant development. Before developing a new restaurant, we conduct an extensive site selection and evaluation process that includes in-depth demographic,
market and financial analyses. By selectively increasing the number of restaurants we operate in a particular market, we can increase brand awareness and effectively leverage our field supervision, corporate infrastructure and local marketing
expenditures. We intend to continue to utilize real estate leasing as a means of minimizing the amount of cash invested in new restaurants. We believe that cash generated from operations, borrowings under our new senior credit facility and leasing
will enable us to continue to pursue our strategy of new restaurant development with respect to our existing brands.

We believe there are
significant growth opportunities for our Hispanic Brand in our existing markets and other markets with demographics that are similar to the demographics of our existing markets. We plan to open new restaurants in our existing markets that may be
either freestanding buildings or restaurants contained within strip shopping centers (in-line restaurants) to further leverage our existing brand awareness. Developing in-line restaurants allows us to selectively expand our brand penetration and
visibility in certain of our existing markets, while doing so at a lower cost than developing a restaurant as a freestanding building. In addition, development of in-line restaurants permits us to further penetrate markets where freestanding
opportunities may be limited. We also believe that there may be opportunities to further expand these brands beyond their current core markets in Texas and Florida.

We believe there may also be opportunities to expand the number of Burger King restaurants we operate through selective acquisitions from other franchisees and through development of new restaurants in our existing
markets. We believe that selective acquisitions of additional Burger King restaurants would result in operating efficiencies from our proven abilities to reduce operating costs and achieve increased economies of scale by leveraging our
infrastructure and operating systems.

Grow Sales and Continue to Improve Restaurant Profitability. We maintain a disciplined
commitment to increasing the sales and profitability of our existing restaurants. Our strategy is to grow sales in our existing restaurants by continuing to develop new products for our Hispanic Brands, developing and enhancing the efficiency and
quality of our proprietary advertising and promotional programs and improving the customer experience at all of our restaurants. Our large base of restaurants, skilled management team and sophisticated management information and operating systems
enable us to optimize operating efficiencies for our restaurants. We are able to control restaurant labor and food costs, effectively manage our restaurant operations and ensure consistent application of operating controls through the use of our
sophisticated management information and point-of-sale systems. Our size and, in the case of Burger King, the size of the Burger King system, enable us to realize benefits from improved bargaining power for purchasing and cost management
initiatives. We believe these factors provide the basis for increased restaurant level and company profitability.



10



---

##### Table of Contents

Overview of Restaurant Concepts

Taco Cabana Restaurants

Our Taco Cabana quick-casual restaurants combine generous portions of fresh,
premium quality Tex-Mex and traditional Mexican style food with the convenience and value of quick-service restaurants. The restaurants typically provide interior, semi-enclosed and patio dining areas with a festive Mexican theme. Menu items include
flame-grilled beef and chicken fajitas served on sizzling iron skillets, quesadillas, traditional Mexican and American breakfasts, other Tex-Mex dishes and fresh, hot flour tortillas. Our Taco Cabana restaurants also offer a variety of beverage
choices, including margaritas and beer. Most of the menu items offered at Taco Cabana are prepared at each restaurant from fresh meat and produce ingredients delivered by suppliers to the restaurant, usually three times each week. Taco Cabana
utilizes fresh, high quality ingredients and prepares most items from scratch. In order to simplify operations and provide a more consistent product, Taco Cabana also uses a number of pre-prepared items.

Our typical Taco Cabana restaurants average approximately 3,200 square feet (exclusive of the exterior dining area) and provide seating for approximately
80 customers, with additional outside patio seating for approximately 50 customers. Taco Cabana restaurants are typically distinctive in appearance, conveying a Mexican theme and permitting easy identification by passing motorists. Our Taco Cabana
restaurants feature rounded fronts, as well as Southwest accents such as a clay tile roof, heavy wood beams and a trellis that shades the patio area, and the use of bright colors outside and inside. Corrugated metal wall panels, aged wood finishes
and distressed stainless steel counter tops are featured inside.

Taco Cabanas interior restaurant design features display cooking
that enables customers to observe fresh fajitas cooking on a grill, a machine making fresh, hot flour tortillas and the preparation of other food items. Upon entry, the customer places an order selected from an overhead menu board, proceeds down a
service line to where the order is picked up, and then passes a salsa bar en route to the dining area. The distinctive salsa bar offers Taco Cabana customers freshly prepared, authentic Tex-Mex ingredients such as salsa de fuego (made with charred
peppers and tomatoes), pico de gallo and salsa (all made from scratch throughout the day at each restaurant), cilantro, pickled jalapeno slices, crisp chopped onions and fresh sliced limes. Depending on the season, time of day and
personal preference, our customers can choose to dine in the restaurants brightly colored and festive interior dining area or in either the semi-enclosed or outdoor patio areas.

Our Taco Cabana restaurants provide the convenience of drive-thru windows as well as the ability for customers to dine-in or take-out. A majority of our
Taco Cabana restaurants are open 24 hours a day. Our hours of operation are continually evaluated for economic viability on a market and individual restaurant basis.

Pollo Tropical Restaurants

Our Pollo Tropical quick-casual restaurants combine high quality,
distinctive menu items and an inviting tropical setting with the convenience and value of quick-service restaurants. Pollo Tropical restaurants offer a unique selection of food items reflecting tropical and Caribbean influences and feature grilled
fresh chicken marinated in a proprietary blend of tropical fruit juices and spices. Chicken is grilled in view of our customers on large, open-flame grills. Pollo Tropical also features additional menu items such as roast pork, a line of
TropiChops® (a bowl containing rice, black beans, chicken or pork), a line of
premium sandwiches and grilled ribs that feature a selection of sauces. We also feature an array of distinctive and popular side dishes, including black beans and rice, yucatan fries and sweet plantains, as well as more traditional menu items such
as french fries, corn and tossed and caesar salads. We also offer uniquely Hispanic desserts, such as flan and tres leches.

Our Pollo
Tropical restaurants typically incorporate high ceilings, large windows, tropical plants, light colored woods, decorative tiles, a visually distinctive exterior entrance tower, lush landscaping and other signature architectural features, all
designed to create an airy, inviting and tropical atmosphere. We design our restaurants to conveniently serve a high volume of customer traffic while retaining an inviting, casual atmosphere.

Our Pollo Tropical restaurants are generally open for lunch, dinner and late night orders seven days per week from 11:00 am to midnight and offer
sit-down dining, counter take-out and drive-thru service to accommodate the varied schedules of families, business people and students. Our menu offers a variety of portion sizes to accommodate a single customer, family or large group. Pollo
Tropical restaurants also offer an economical catering menu, with special prices and portions to serve parties in excess of 25 people.

Our
Pollo Tropical restaurants typically provide seating for 80 to 100 customers and provide drive-thru service. At December 31, 2004 all of our company-owned Pollo Tropical restaurants were freestanding buildings except for five locations
contained within strip shopping centers and one street-level storefront location in an office building. Our typical freestanding Pollo Tropical restaurant ranges between 2,800 and 3,200 square feet.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

Burger King Restaurants

Burger King Corporation (BKC) is one of the largest quick-service hamburger restaurant chains in the world. According to BKC, at June 30,
2004 there were approximately 11,200 restaurants in 61 countries worldwide, including approximately 7,600 in the United States. Total BKC worldwide restaurant sales for the year ended June 30, 2004 were approximately $11.1 billion, of which
approximately $7.7 billion were in the United States.

Have It Your Way®service, flame broiling, generous portions and competitive prices characterize the Burger King system marketing strategy. Our Burger
King restaurants feature flame-broiled hamburgers and other sandwiches, the most popular of which is the WHOPPER®sandwich. The WHOPPER is a large, flame-broiled hamburger on a toasted bun garnished with mayonnaise, lettuce, onions, pickles and tomatoes. The basic menu of all Burger King restaurants consists of hamburgers,
cheeseburgers, chicken and fish sandwiches, breakfast items, french fries, onion rings, salads, chili, shakes, desserts, soft drinks and other beverages. In addition, promotional menu items are introduced periodically for limited periods. BKC
continually seeks to develop new products as it endeavors to enhance the menu and service of Burger King restaurants.

Our Burger King
restaurants are typically open seven days per week with minimum operating hours from 6:00 am to 11:00 pm. Burger King restaurants are quick-service restaurants of distinctive design and are generally located in high-traffic areas throughout the
United States. We believe that the primary competitive advantages of Burger King restaurants are:



| |  |  | brand recognition;
| | - |  | ------------------



| |  |  | convenience of location;
| | - |  | ------------------------



| |  |  | speed of service;
| | - |  | -----------------



| |  |  | quality; and
| | - |  | ------------



| |  |  | price.
| | - |  | ------

Burger King restaurants are designed to appeal to
a broad spectrum of consumers, with multiple day-part meal segments targeted to different groups of consumers.

Our Burger King restaurants
consist of one of several building types with various seating capacities. BKCs traditional freestanding restaurant contains approximately 2,800 to 3,200 square feet with seating capacity for 90 to 100 customers, has drive-thru service windows,
and has adjacent parking areas. As of December 31, 2004, 334 of our 348 Burger King restaurants were freestanding.



12



---

##### Table of Contents

Restaurant Economics

Selected restaurant operating data for our three restaurant concepts is as follows:



|                                                              |  |                         |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ---- |  | - | ----- | -
|                                                              |  | Year Ended December 31, |      
|                                                              |  | 2002                    |       |   | 2003 |   |       | 2004 | 
|Taco Cabana:                                                  |  |                         |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Average annual (52 weeks) sales per restaurant (in thousands) |  | $                       | 1,527 |   |      | $ | 1,523 |      |  | $ | 1,604 |  
|Average sales transaction                                     |  | $                       | 6.65  |   |      | $ | 6.66  |      |  | $ | 6.88  |  
|Drive-through sales as a percentage of total sales            |  |                         | 45.6  | % |      |   | 46.6  | %    |  |   | 47.2  | %
|Day part sales percentages:                                   |  |                         |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Breakfast                                                     |  |                         | 15.8  | % |      |   | 15.8  | %    |  |   | 16.0  | %
|Lunch                                                         |  |                         | 22.4  | % |      |   | 22.7  | %    |  |   | 23.1  | %
|Dinner                                                        |  |                         | 24.5  | % |      |   | 25.3  | %    |  |   | 25.4  | %
|Late night (9 pm to midnight)                                 |  |                         | 15.0  | % |      |   | 14.5  | %    |  |   | 14.1  | %
|Other (2 pm to 5 pm and midnight to 6 am)                     |  |                         | 22.3  | % |      |   | 21.7  | %    |  |   | 21.4  | %
|                                                              |  |                         |      
|Pollo Tropical:                                               |  |                         |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Average annual (52 weeks) sales per restaurant (in thousands) |  | $                       | 1,807 |   |      | $ | 1,838 |      |  | $ | 2,018 |  
|Average sales transaction                                     |  | $                       | 8.11  |   |      | $ | 8.18  |      |  | $ | 8.25  |  
|Drive-through sales as a percentage of total sales            |  |                         | 40.3  | % |      |   | 42.2  | %    |  |   | 42.5  | %
|Day part sales percentages:                                   |  |                         |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Lunch                                                         |  |                         | 46.7  | % |      |   | 45.9  | %    |  |   | 45.7  | %
|Dinner and late night                                         |  |                         | 53.3  | % |      |   | 54.1  | %    |  |   | 54.3  | %
|                                                              |  |                         |      
|Burger King:                                                  |  |                         |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Average annual (52 weeks) sales per restaurant (in thousands) |  | $                       | 1,069 |   |      | $ | 1,003 |      |  | $ | 1,034 |  
|Average sales transaction                                     |  | $                       | 4.46  |   |      | $ | 4.47  |      |  | $ | 4.74  |  
|Drive-through sales as a percentage of total sales            |  |                         | 60.5  | % |      |   | 61.8  | %    |  |   | 61.8  | %
|Day part sales percentages:                                   |  |                         |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Breakfast                                                     |  |                         | 14.3  | % |      |   | 14.6  | %    |  |   | 14.4  | %
|Lunch                                                         |  |                         | 33.4  | % |      |   | 33.4  | %    |  |   | 33.6  | %
|Dinner                                                        |  |                         | 27.1  | % |      |   | 26.9  | %    |  |   | 26.9  | %
|Afternoon and late night                                      |  |                         | 25.2  | % |      |   | 25.1  | %    |  |   | 25.1  | %

Restaurant Capital Costs

The cost of equipment, seating, signage and other interior costs of a standard new Taco Cabana restaurant currently is approximately $420,000 (excluding the cost of the land, building and site improvements). The cost
of the land generally ranges from $650,000 to $800,000. The cost of building and site improvements generally ranges from $800,000 to $850,000. We typically lease the real estate associated with our Taco Cabana restaurants.

The cost of equipment, seating, signage and other interior costs of a standard new Pollo Tropical restaurant currently is approximately $365,000
(excluding the cost of the land, building and site improvements). The cost of land generally ranges from $600,000 to $1,000,000. The cost of building and site improvements generally ranges from $800,000 to $900,000. We typically lease the real
estate associated with our Pollo Tropical restaurants.

The cost of the franchise fee, equipment, seating, signage and other interior costs
of a standard new Burger King restaurant currently is approximately $385,000 (excluding the cost of the land, building and site improvements). The cost of land generally ranges from $400,000 to $525,000. The cost of building and site improvements
generally ranges from $550,000 to $625,000. We typically lease the real estate associated with our Burger King restaurants.

Seasonality

Our business is moderately seasonal due to regional weather conditions. Sales from our Taco Cabana restaurants (located in Texas, Oklahoma and New
Mexico) and our Burger King restaurants (primarily located in the Northeast) are generally higher during the summer months than during the winter months. Sales from our Pollo Tropical restaurants (located in south and central Florida) are generally
higher during the winter months than during the summer months. We believe this seasonal impact is not material to our business as a whole because our multiple concepts operating in diverse geographic areas enable us to reduce our dependence on the
economic performance of any one particular region.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

Restaurant Locations

As of December 31, 2004, we owned and operated 126 Taco Cabana restaurants and franchised seven Taco Cabana restaurants located in the following states:



|           |  |       |  |            |  |      
|---------- |  | ----- |  | ---------- |  | -----
|           |  | Owned |  | Franchised |  | Total
|Texas      |  | 119   |  | 4          |  | 123  
|Oklahoma   |  | 6     |  |           |  | 6    
|New Mexico |  | 1     |  | 2          |  | 3    
|Georgia    |  |      |  | 1          |  | 1    
|           |  |       |  |            |  |      
|Total      |  | 126   |  | 7          |  | 133  
|           |  |       |  |            |  |      

As of December 31, 2004, we owned and operated 63 Pollo Tropical restaurants, all located in
Florida. In addition, of our 24 franchised Pollo Tropical restaurants, as of December 31, 2004, 20 are located in Puerto Rico; three are located in Ecuador and one in Miami.

The following table sets forth the locations of the 348 Burger King restaurants we operated at December 31, 2004:



|               |  |                 
|-------------- |  | ----------------
|State          |  | TotalRestaurants
|Connecticut    |  | 1               
|Indiana        |  | 5               
|Kentucky       |  | 9               
|Maine          |  | 4               
|Massachusetts  |  | 1               
|Michigan       |  | 26              
|New Jersey     |  | 2               
|New York       |  | 143             
|North Carolina |  | 40              
|Ohio           |  | 83              
|Pennsylvania   |  | 12              
|South Carolina |  | 21              
|Vermont        |  | 1               
|               |  |                 
|Total          |  | 348             
|               |  |                 

Operations

Management Structure

We conduct substantially all of our executive management, finance, marketing
and operations support functions from our corporate headquarters in Syracuse, New York, our Taco Cabana division headquarters in San Antonio, Texas and our Pollo Tropical division headquarters in Miami, Florida. The management structure of Taco
Cabana consists of an Executive Vice President of Operations, who has over 30 years of restaurant experience, and a Regional Vice President and a Regional Director supported by 17 district supervisors. The management structure for Pollo Tropical
consists of an Executive Vice President, who has over 30 years of experience in the restaurant industry, and a Vice President of Operations supported by eight district supervisors. Our Burger King operations are overseen by four Regional Directors,
three of whom are Vice Presidents, that have an average of 25 years of Burger King restaurant experience. Forty-four district supervisors that have an average of 20 years of restaurant management experience in the Burger King system support the
Regional Directors.

For each of our concepts, a district supervisor is responsible for the direct oversight of the day-to-day operations
of an average of approximately seven restaurants. Typically, district supervisors have previously served as restaurant managers at one of our restaurants. Regional directors, district supervisors and restaurant managers are compensated with a fixed
salary plus an incentive bonus based upon the performance of the restaurants under their supervision. Typically, our restaurants are staffed with hourly employees who are supervised by a salaried manager and two or three salaried assistant managers.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

Training

We maintain a comprehensive training and development program for all of our personnel and provide both classroom and in-restaurant training for our salaried and hourly personnel. The program emphasizes system-wide
operating procedures, food preparation methods and customer service standards for each of the concepts. In addition, BKCs training and development programs are also available to us as a franchisee.

Management Information Systems

Our
management information systems, which we believe are more sophisticated than systems typically utilized by other small quick-casual/quick-service restaurant operators and other Burger King franchisees, provide us with the ability to more efficiently
and effectively manage our restaurants and to ensure consistent application of operating controls at our restaurants. Our size also affords us the ability to maintain an in-house staff of information and restaurant systems professionals dedicated to
continuously enhancing our systems. In addition, these capabilities allow us to integrate newly developed or acquired restaurants and to leverage our investments in information technology over a larger base of restaurants.

Our restaurants generally employ touch-screen point-of-sale (POS) systems that are designed to facilitate accuracy and speed of order taking. These
systems are user-friendly, require limited cashier training and improve speed-of-service through the use of conversational order-taking techniques. The POS systems are integrated with PC-based applications at the restaurant that are designed to
facilitate financial and management control of our restaurant operations.

Our restaurant systems provide daily tracking and reporting of
traffic counts, menu item sales, labor and food data, and other key operating information for each restaurant. We electronically communicate with our restaurants on a daily basis, which enables us to collect this information for use in our corporate
management systems. Our corporate and divisional administrative headquarters house client/server-based systems that support all of our accounting, operating and reporting systems. We also operate a 24-hour, seven-day help desk at our corporate
headquarters that enables us to provide systems and operational support to our restaurant operations as required. Among other things, our restaurant information systems provide us with the ability to:



| |  |  | monitor labor utilization and sales trends on a real-time basis at each restaurant, enabling the restaurant manager to effectively manage to our established labor standards on a
timely basis;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | reduce shrinkage using restaurant-level inventory management and centralized standard costing systems;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | analyze sales and product mix data to help restaurant management personnel forecast production levels;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | monitor day-part drive-thru speed of service at each of our restaurants;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | systematically communicate human resource and payroll data to our administrative offices for efficient centralized management of labor costing and payroll processing;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | employ centralized control over price, menu and inventory management activities at the restaurant utilizing the remote access capabilities of our systems;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | take advantage of electronic commerce including our ability to place orders with suppliers and to integrate detailed invoice, receiving and product data with our inventory and
accounting systems; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | provide analyses, reporting and tools to enable all levels of management to review a wide-range of financial and operational data.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Information from our systems is available daily to the restaurant manager, who is expected to react quickly to trends or situations in his or her
restaurant. Our district supervisors also receive daily information for all restaurants under their control and have computer access to key operating data on a remote basis using our corporate intranet. Management personnel at all levels, from the
restaurant manager through senior management, monitor key restaurant performance indicators.

Site Selection

We believe that the location of our restaurants is a critical component of each restaurants success. We evaluate potential new sites on many
critical criteria including accessibility, visibility, costs, surrounding traffic patterns, competition and demographic characteristics. Our senior management determines the acceptability of all acquisition prospects and new sites, based upon
analyses prepared by our real estate and financial professionals and operations personnel.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

Burger King Franchise Agreements

Each of our Burger King restaurants operates under a separate franchise agreement with BKC. Our franchise agreements with BKC generally require, among other things, that all restaurants comply with specified design
criteria and be operated in a prescribed manner, including utilization of the standard Burger King menu. In addition, our Burger King franchise agreements generally require that our restaurants conform to BKCs current image and provide for
remodeling of our restaurants at the request of BKC during the tenth year of the agreements to conform to such current image. These franchise agreements with BKC provide for an initial term of 20 years and currently have an initial franchise fee of
$50,000. Any franchise agreement, including renewals, can be extended at our discretion for an additional 20-year term, with BKCs approval, provided the restaurant meets the then-current Burger King operating and image standards and the
franchisee is not in default under the terms of the franchise agreement. The franchise agreement fee for subsequent renewals is currently $50,000. BKC may not cancel or terminate our franchise agreements unless we are in default of the terms of the
agreements. We are not in default under any of the franchise agreements with BKC.

In order to renew a franchise agreement with BKC, a
franchisee is typically required to make capital improvements to the restaurant to bring it up to Burger Kings current design standards. The required capital improvements will vary widely depending upon the magnitude of the required changes
and the degree to which we have made interim improvements to the restaurant. We have 23 franchise agreements expiring in 2005, 18 franchise agreements expiring in 2006 and 17 franchise agreements expiring in 2007. If we determine that a restaurant
is under-performing, we may elect not to renew the franchise agreement. Of our franchise agreements expiring in 2005 and 2006, we currently anticipate that we would likely elect not to renew approximately 18 franchise agreements due to the cost of
the required capital improvements that we would need to make as a result of such renewals relative to the profitability of such restaurants. Based on the current profitability of such restaurants, we believe that the impact on our cash provided from
operating activities as a result of such non- renewals will not be material. The capital improvements cost per restaurant we may incur in connection with such franchise agreements that we elect to renew, may range from $350,000 to $450,000. Our
determination of whether to renew such franchise agreements is not final and is subject to further evaluation and may change, depending on many factors including our assessment of the anticipated future profitability of the subject restaurants and
BKCs requirements for renewing each such franchise.

We believe that we will be able to satisfy BKCs normal franchise agreement
renewal policies. Accordingly, we believe that renewal franchise agreements will be granted on a timely basis by BKC at the expiration of our existing franchise agreements. Historically, BKC has granted all of our requests for successor franchise
agreements.

In addition to the initial franchise fee, we generally pay to BKC a monthly royalty of 31/2% of the gross revenues from our Burger King restaurants. For a more detailed explanation of the franchise fees
see Franchise Fees and Early Successor Program below. We also contribute 4% of restaurant sales from our Burger King restaurants to fund BKCs national and regional advertising. BKC engages in substantial national and
regional advertising and promotional activities and other efforts to maintain and enhance the Burger King brand. We supplement from time to time BKCs marketing with local advertising and promotional campaigns. See Advertising and
Promotion.

Our franchise agreements with BKC do not give us exclusive rights to operate Burger King restaurants in any
defined territory. Although we believe that BKC generally seeks to ensure that newly granted franchises do not materially adversely affect the operations of existing Burger King restaurants, we cannot assure you that franchises granted by BKC to
third parties will not adversely affect any Burger King restaurants that we operate.

We are required to obtain BKCs consent before
we acquire existing Burger King restaurants from other franchisees or develop new Burger King restaurants. BKC also has the right of first refusal to purchase any Burger King restaurant that is being offered for sale by a franchisee. To date, BKC
has approved all of our acquisitions of Burger King restaurants from other franchisees; however, in two instances, BKC exercised its right of first refusal and purchased restaurants we sought to acquire.

Franchise Fees and Early Successor Program

On July 1, 2000, BKC increased its royalty and franchise fees for most new restaurants. The franchise fee for new restaurants increased from $40,000 to $50,000 for a 20-year agreement and the royalty rate increased from 31/2% of sales to 41/2% of sales, after a transitional period from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2003. For franchise agreements entered into during the transitional period, the royalty rate is 4.0% of sales for
the first ten years of the agreement and 41/2% of sales for the balance of the term.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

As of July 1, 2001, existing restaurants that renewed their franchise agreements pay a royalty of
41/2% of sales for the full term of the renewed agreement. The advertising contribution remained at 4.0% of
sales. The royalty rates for existing franchise agreements are not affected by these changes until the time of renewal.

BKC offered
a voluntary program to encourage franchisees to accelerate the renewal of their franchise agreements. Franchisees that elected to participate in the Early Successor Incentive Program were required to make capital improvements in their restaurants to
bring them up to Burger Kings current design image. Franchise agreements entered into under this program contain special provisions regarding the royalty rates including a reduction in the royalty for a period of time.

For commitments made prior to July 1, 2000 to renew franchise agreements under BKCs Fiscal 2000 Early Successor Incentive Program, the renewal
franchise fee remained at $40,000. The royalty rate under this program remained at 31/2% of sales through
March 31, 2002, at which time it was reduced to 23/4% of sales for the following five-year period. The
royalty rate reverts back to 31/2% of sales effective April 1, 2007 for the remainder of any of the initial
franchise term, and then increases to 41/2% of sales for the balance of the new agreement.

For commitments made between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2001 to renew franchise agreements under
BKCs Fiscal 2001 Early Successor Incentive Program, the renewal franchise fee increased to $50,000. The royalty rate remained at 31/2% of sales through September 30, 2002, at which time it was reduced to 3% of sales for a three-year period. The royalty rate reverts back to 31/2% of sales effective October 1, 2005 for the remainder of any of the initial franchise term, and then increases to 41/2% of sales for the balance of the new franchise agreement.

After evaluating the applicable royalty reductions and the acceleration of the required capital improvements, in 2000 we elected to renew 48 franchise
agreements under BKCs Early Successor Incentive Program. Our capital expenditures relating to these renewals have been completed. Burger King royalties, as a percentage of our Burger King restaurant sales, were 3.4% in 2004, 2003 and 2002.

Transformation Initiatives

Over the past four years, BKC mandated certain image and facility upgrades and offered franchisees certain initiatives to encourage and facilitate franchisees investment in these upgrades to their restaurants. These transformation
upgrades included the installation of new signage with the new Burger King logos, a new drive-thru equipment package, and where necessary, expenditures for painting, parking lot maintenance and landscaping. In addition, BKC defined enhancements to
the kitchen including a new high-speed toaster, improved product holding units and a new self-loading broiler capable of cooking at different speeds and temperatures to facilitate the preparation of a wider variety of menu items. By an amendment to
our franchise agreements, we committed:



| |  |  | to install the new signage in substantially all of our restaurants;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to spruce up our restaurants to the extent necessary, including painting, parking lot sealing/striping and landscaping;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to install the new drive-thru package, which includes new menu boards, an order confirmation unit and an improved speaker system; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to roll-out and install the new kitchen initiatives as approved and mandated by BKC which included improved toasting and holding equipment (Phase I initiatives) and a new broiler
(Phase II initiatives).
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BKC also arranged for the Coca-Cola Company and Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up, Inc. to make funds
available to franchisees to be used in connection with the transformation initiatives. By agreeing to make the investments associated with the transformation initiatives, we received $56,000 per restaurant in 2000, or $19.8 million in the aggregate,
from the fund established by Coca-Cola and Dr. Pepper. We also received $1.6 million from this fund on a supplemental basis in 2001 pertaining to completing the drive-thru package. For a discussion of the accounting treatment of the amounts
received from Coca-Cola and Dr. Pepper, see Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements.

We have completed all of the initiatives
above, with the exception of the Phase II kitchen initiatives, which have not yet been mandated by BKC. Total expenditures related to these activities over the past four years were $12.8 million.



17



---

##### Table of Contents

Hispanic Brands Franchise Operations

As of December 31, 2004, Taco Cabana had three franchisees operating a total of seven Taco Cabana restaurants. As of December 31, 2004, Pollo Tropical had three franchisees operating a total of 24 Pollo
Tropical restaurants located in Puerto Rico, Ecuador and Miami. While our existing franchisees may open new restaurants from time to time, we are not actively expanding our franchise operations at the present time.

All franchisees are required to operate their restaurants in compliance with certain methods, standards and specifications developed by us regarding such
matters as menu items, recipes, food preparation, materials, supplies, services, fixtures, furnishings, decor and signs. The franchisees have discretion to determine the prices to be charged to customers. In addition, all franchisees are required to
purchase substantially all food, ingredients, supplies and materials from suppliers approved by us.

Advertising and Promotion

We believe our Hispanic Brands are among the most highly recognized quick-casual restaurant brands in their core markets of Texas and south and central
Florida. Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical utilize an integrated, multi-level marketing approach that includes periodic chain-wide promotions, direct mail, in-store promotions, local store marketing and other strategies, including the use of radio and
television advertising in their major markets. Combination value meals are also utilized as well as limited time offer menu item promotions. Pollo Tropical advertises in both English and Spanish media throughout the year. As a percentage of our Taco
Cabana restaurant sales, Taco Cabanas advertising expenditures were 4.1% in 2004, 4.7% in 2003, and 4.3% in 2002. Taco Cabanas advertising expenditures, as a percentage of restaurant sales, were higher in 2003 than historical levels due
to additional promotions in certain markets. As a percentage of restaurant sales, Pollo Tropical advertising expenditures were 1.6% in 2004, due to lower television and radio advertising, and 3.6% in each of 2003 and 2002. We currently anticipate
our 2005 Pollo Tropical advertising expenditures to range between 2.0% and 2.5% of our Pollo Tropical restaurant sales, however the Company may elect in the future to further increase Pollo Tropical advertising expenditures to the historical levels
in 2003 and 2002.

The efficiency and quality of advertising and promotional programs can significantly affect quick-casual/quick-service
restaurant businesses. We believe that one of the major advantages of being a Burger King franchisee is the value of the extensive regional and national advertising and promotional programs conducted by BKC. In addition to the benefits derived from
BKCs advertising spending, we supplement from time to time BKCs advertising and promotional activities with our own local advertising and promotions, including the purchase of additional television, radio and print advertising. The
concentration of our Burger King restaurants in many of our markets permits us to leverage advertising in those markets. We also utilize promotional programs, such as combination value meals and discounted prices, targeted to our customers, in order
to create a flexible and directed marketing program.

We are generally required to contribute 4% of restaurant sales from our Burger King
restaurants to an advertising fund utilized by BKC for its advertising, promotional programs and public relations activities. BKCs advertising programs consist of national campaigns supplemented by local advertising. BKCs advertising
campaigns are generally carried on television, radio and in circulated print media (national and regional newspapers and magazines).

Product
Development

Each of Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical has separate and complete product research and development functions, comparable to
other large multi-unit restaurant companies. These capabilities enable us to continually refine our menu offerings and develop new products for introduction in our Hispanic Brand restaurants. These functions include:



| |  |  | fully equipped test kitchens;
| | - |  | -----------------------------



| |  |  | professional culinary and quality assurance team members;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | consumer research protocol;
| | - |  | ---------------------------



| |  |  | uniform and detailed product specification formats; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | product development committees that integrate marketing, operations, financial analysis and procurement.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Taco Cabanas test kitchen is located near our San Antonio division headquarters in leased commercial space. The facility includes a large test
kitchen, with equipment that mirrors the capability of a Taco Cabana restaurant, office space for all R&D staff, and a large tasting and meeting room. There are three permanent staff positions, including a Director of R&D, a Manager of
R&D and Quality Assurance and a staff assistant.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

Pollo Tropicals test kitchen is located in our Miami division headquarters. The facility includes
cooking equipment that mirrors the capability of a Pollo Tropical restaurant and a tasting area. There are three permanent staff positions, including a Director of R&D, a Manager of R&D and a Quality Assurance and Purchasing assistant.

Suppliers and Distributors

For our
Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical restaurants, we have negotiated directly with local and national suppliers for the purchase of food and beverage products and supplies to ensure consistent quality and freshness and to obtain competitive prices. Taco
Cabana and Pollo Tropical restaurants food and supplies are ordered from approved suppliers and are shipped via distributors to the restaurants. Both brands are responsible for monitoring quality control and supervision of these suppliers and
conduct inspections to observe the preparation and quality of products purchased. For our Taco Cabana restaurants, SYGMA Network, Inc. (SYGMA) serves as our primary distributor of food and beverage products and supplies. SYGMA purchases, warehouses
and distributes products for these restaurants under a distribution service agreement that expires on December 31, 2005. For our Pollo Tropical restaurants, Henry Lee, a division of Gordon Food Service, serves as our primary distributor of food
and paper products under an agreement that expires on March 16, 2007. We rely significantly on these suppliers but, in general, if any such suppliers are unable to service us, we believe that we have significant alternative sources available to
us to avoid any material disruption in service. However, we rely on Pilgrims Pride (formerly Conagra) and Gold Kist as our two suppliers of chicken for our Pollo Tropical restaurants and, although we believe that alternative sources of chicken
are available to us, if either such supplier is unable to service us, this could lead to a material disruption of service or supply until a new supplier is engaged, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. With respect to our
distributors for our Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical restaurants, although we believe that alternative distributors are available to us, if any of our distributors are unable to service us, this could lead to a material disruption of service or
supply until a new distributor is engaged, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are a member of a national
purchasing cooperative, Restaurant Services, Inc., created for the Burger King system. Restaurant Services is a non-profit independent cooperative that acts as the purchasing agent for approved distributors to the Burger King system and serves to
negotiate the lowest cost for the system. We use our purchasing power to negotiate directly with certain other vendors, to obtain favorable pricing and terms for supplying our restaurants. For our Burger King restaurants, we are required to purchase
all of our foodstuffs, paper goods and packaging materials from BKC-approved suppliers. We currently utilize four distributors to supply our Burger King restaurants with the majority of their foodstuffs in various geographical areas. We may purchase
non-food items such as kitchen utensils, equipment maintenance tools and other supplies from any suitable source so long as such items meet BKC product uniformity standards. All BKC-approved distributors are required to purchase foodstuffs and
supplies from BKC-approved manufacturers and purveyors. BKC is responsible for monitoring quality control and supervision of these manufacturers and conducts regular visits to observe the preparation of foodstuffs, and to run various tests to ensure
that only high quality foodstuffs are sold to BKC-approved suppliers. In addition, BKC coordinates and supervises audits of approved suppliers and distributors to determine continuing product specification compliance and to ensure that manufacturing
plant and distribution center standards are met. In the event these Burger King suppliers are unable to service us, we believe that we have significant alternative sources available to us to avoid any material disruption in service.

Quality Assurance

At each of our three concepts, our
operational focus is closely monitored to achieve a high level of customer satisfaction via speed, order accuracy and quality of service. Our senior management and restaurant management staffs are principally responsible for ensuring compliance with
our operating policies, and with respect to our Burger King restaurants, BKCs required operating procedures as well. We have uniform operating standards and specifications relating to the quality, preparation and selection of menu items,
maintenance and cleanliness of the premises and employee conduct. In order to maintain compliance with these operating standards and specifications, we distribute to our restaurant operations management team detailed reports measuring compliance
with various customer service standards and objectives, including the results of our mystery shopper program. These mystery shopper programs are conducted by an independent agency and consist of evaluations of speed, quality
of service and other operational objectives including the cleanliness of our restaurants.

We also operate in accordance with quality
assurance and health standards mandated by federal, state and local governmental laws and regulations. These standards include food preparation rules regarding, among other things, minimum cooking times and temperatures, maximum time standards for
holding prepared food, food handling guidelines and cleanliness. To maintain these standards, we conduct unscheduled inspections of our restaurants. In addition, restaurant managers conduct internal inspections for taste, quality, cleanliness and
food safety on a regular basis.



19



---

##### Table of Contents

Trademarks

We believe that our names and logos for our Hispanic Brands are important to our operations. We have registered our principal Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical logos and designs with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on the Principal
Register as a service mark for our restaurant services. We also have secured or have applied for state and federal registrations of several other advertising or promotional marks, including variations of our principal marks, and have applied for or
been granted registrations in foreign countries of our principal marks and several other marks. We intend to protect both Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical trademarks by appropriate legal action whenever necessary. In certain foreign countries, we have
been involved in trademark opposition proceedings to defend our rights to register certain trademarks.

Other than the Taco Cabana and
Pollo Tropical trademarks, we have no proprietary intellectual property other than the logo and trademark of Carrols. As a franchisee of Burger King, we also have contractual rights to use certain BKC-owned trademarks, service marks and other
intellectual property relating to the Burger King concept.

Government Regulation

Various federal, state and local laws affect our business, including various health, sanitation, fire and safety standards. Restaurants to be constructed
or remodeled are subject to state and local building code and zoning requirements. In connection with the development and remodeling of our restaurants, we may incur costs to meet certain federal, state and local regulations, including regulations
promulgated under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

We are subject to the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and various state laws
governing such matters as:



| |  |  | minimum wage requirements;
| | - |  | --------------------------



| |  |  | overtime; and
| | - |  | -------------



| |  |  | other working conditions and citizenship requirements.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------

A
significant number of our food service personnel are paid at rates related to the federal, and where applicable, state minimum wage and, accordingly, increases in the minimum wage have increased and in the future will increase wage rates at our
restaurants.

We are also subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws, rules and regulations. We believe that we conduct
our operations in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. None of the applicable environmental laws or regulations has had a material adverse effect on our consolidated operations, cash flows or financial
condition.

Taco Cabana is subject to alcoholic beverage control regulations that require state, county or municipal licenses or permits to
sell alcoholic beverages at each location. Typically, licenses must be renewed annually and may be revoked or suspended for cause at any time. Licensing entities, authorized with law enforcement authority, may issue violations and conduct audits and
investigations of the restaurants records and procedures. Alcoholic beverage control regulations relate to numerous aspects of daily operations of Taco Cabana restaurants, including minimum age for consumption, certification requirements for
employees, hours of operation, advertising, wholesale purchasing, inventory control and handling, storage and dispensing of alcoholic beverages. These regulations also prescribe certain required banking and accounting practices related to alcohol
sales and purchasing.

Taco Cabana is subject to state dram-shop laws in the states in which it operates. Dram-shop laws
provide a person injured by an intoxicated person the right to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to the intoxicated person. We have specific insurance that covers claims arising under dram-shop laws.
However, it is not assured that this insurance will be adequate to cover any claims that may be instituted against us.

With respect to the
franchising of Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical restaurants, we are subject to franchise and related regulations in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions where we offer and sell franchises. These regulations include obligations to provide
disclosure about our two concepts, the franchise agreements and the franchise system. The regulations also include obligations to register certain franchise documents in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, and obligations to disclose the substantive
relationship between the parties to the agreements.



20



---

##### Table of Contents

Competition

The restaurant industry is highly competitive with respect to price, service, location and food quality. In each of our markets, our restaurants compete with a large number of national and regional restaurant chains, as well as locally
owned restaurants, offering low- and medium-priced fare. We also compete with convenience stores, delicatessens and prepared food counters in supermarkets, grocery stores, cafeterias and other purveyors of moderately priced and quickly prepared
foods.

We believe that:



| |  |  | product quality and taste;
| | - |  | --------------------------



| |  |  | brand recognition;
| | - |  | ------------------



| |  |  | convenience of location;
| | - |  | ------------------------



| |  |  | speed of service;
| | - |  | -----------------



| |  |  | menu variety;
| | - |  | -------------



| |  |  | price; and
| | - |  | ----------



| |  |  | ambiance
| | - |  | --------

are the most important competitive factors in the quick-casual
and quick-service restaurant segments and that our three concepts effectively compete in each category.

Taco Cabanas restaurants,
although part of the quick-casual segment of the restaurant industry, primarily compete in Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico with quick-service restaurants, including those in the quick- service Mexican segment such as Taco Bell, quick-casual
restaurants and traditional casual dining Mexican restaurants. We believe that Taco Cabanas combination of freshly prepared food, distinctive ambiance and superior service help to distinguish Taco Cabana restaurants from quick-service
operators, while Taco Cabanas price-value relationship enables it to compete favorably with more expensive casual dining Mexican restaurants.

In addition to quick-service hamburger restaurant chains as well as other types of quick-casual restaurants, Pollo Tropicals competitors include the south and central Florida locations of national chicken-based concepts, such as
Boston Market and KFC, and regional grilled chicken concepts.

With respect to our Burger King restaurants, our largest competitors are
McDonalds and Wendys restaurants. According to publicly available information, McDonalds restaurants had aggregate U.S. system wide sales of $24.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2004 and operated 13,673 restaurants in
the United States at that date, and Wendys restaurants had aggregate system wide sales of $7.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2004 and operated 5,935 restaurants in the United States at that date.

Employees

As of December 31, 2004, we employed
approximately 16,300 persons, of which approximately 300 were administrative personnel and approximately 16,000 were restaurant operations personnel. None of our employees is covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our relations
with our employees are good.

Availability of Information

The Company files annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The public may read and copy any materials the Company files with the
SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet
site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.



21



---

##### Table of Contents

The Company makes available through its internet website (www.carrols.com) its annual report on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after
electronically filing such material with the SEC. The reference to the Companys website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the website and should not be considered part of this document.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

As of
December 31, 2004, we owned or leased the following restaurant properties:



|                            |  |                         |  |                          |  |                               |  |         
|--------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- |  | --------
|                            |  | OwnedLand;OwnedBuilding |  | LeasedLand;OwnedBuilding |  | LeasedLand;Leased Building(1) |  | Total(2)
|Restaurants:                |  |                         |  |                          |  |                               |  |         
|Taco Cabana                 |  | 4                       |  | 21                       |  | 101                           |  | 126     
|Pollo Tropical              |  | 1                       |  | 21                       |  | 41                            |  | 63      
|Burger King                 |  | 14                      |  | 28                       |  | 306                           |  | 348     
|                            |  |                         |  |                          |  |                               |  |         
|Total operating restaurants |  | 19                      |  | 70                       |  | 448                           |  | 537     
|                            |  |                         |  |                          |  |                               |  |         

---

|(1) | Includes 19 restaurants located in mall shopping centers.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Excludes restaurants operated by our franchisees. In addition, as of December 31, 2004, we had four restaurants under construction, three properties leased to third parties and
three properties available for sale or lease.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As of December 31, 2004, we leased 97% of our Taco Cabana restaurants,
98% of our Pollo Tropical restaurants and 96% of our Burger King restaurants. We typically enter into leases (including options to renew) from 20 to 40 years. The average remaining term for all leases, including options, is approximately 24 years.
Generally, we have been able to renew leases, upon or prior to their expiration, at the prevailing market rates.

Most of our Burger King
restaurant leases are coterminous with the related franchise agreements. We believe that we generally will be able to renew, at commercially reasonable rates, the leases whose terms expire prior to the expiration of that locations Burger King
franchise agreement.

Most leases require us, as lessee, to pay utility and water charges and real estate taxes. Certain leases also
require contingent rentals based upon a percentage of gross sales of the particular restaurant that exceed specified minimums. In some of our mall locations, we are also required to pay certain other charges such as a pro rata share of the
malls common area maintenance costs, insurance and security costs.

In addition to the restaurant locations set forth under
Restaurant Locations, we own a building with approximately 25,300 square feet at 968 James Street, Syracuse, New York, which houses our executive offices and most of our administrative operations for our Burger King restaurants. We
lease five small regional offices that support the management of our Burger King restaurants. We also lease 13,449 square feet at 7300 North Kendall Drive, 8th Floor, Miami, Florida, which houses most of our administrative operations for our Pollo
Tropical restaurants. In addition, we lease approximately 17,700 square feet of office space at 8918 Tesoro Drive, Suite 200, San Antonio, Texas, which houses most of our administrative operations for our Taco Cabana restaurants.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On April 20,
2005, Judge Frederick Scullin, Jr. issued a decision and order granting our Motion for Summary Judgment in the action filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on November 16, 1998 against us in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of New York under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which alleged that we had engaged in a pattern and practice of unlawful discrimination, harassment and retaliation against former and current female
employees. Subject to possible appeal by the EEOC, the case is dismissed, however the court noted that it was not ruling on the claims, if any, that individual employees might have against us. We do not believe that any individual claims, if any,
would have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

On November 30, 2002, four former hourly employees commenced a lawsuit against the Company in the
United States District Court for the Western District of New York entitled Dawn Seever, et al. v. Carrols Corporation. The lawsuit alleges, in substance, that the Company violated certain minimum wage laws under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act
and related state laws by requiring employees to work without recording their time and by retaliating against those who complained. The plaintiffs seek damages, costs and injunctive relief. They also seek to notify, and eventually certify, a class
consisting of current and former employees who, since 1998, have worked, or are working, for the Company. On February 25, 2005 the plaintiffs filed motions for judicial notice and to expand discovery class-wide. The Company has opposed
plaintiffs motions. It is too early to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or estimate the amount or range of potential loss. Consequently, it is not possible to predict what adverse impact, if any, this case could have on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations and cash flows. We intend to continue to contest this case vigorously.

We are a
party to various other litigation matters incidental to the conduct of our business. We do not believe that the outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None



23



---

##### Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

There is no established trading market for our capital stock. Carrols Holdings owns 10 shares of our common stock (representing 100% of our capital stock).

On December 22, 2004, our Board of Directors approved a one-time cash dividend of $116.8 million to our sole stockholder, Carrols Holdings, from the net proceeds of the sale of $180 million of the notes, and the
consummation of new senior credit facility with a new syndicate of lenders led by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., which provided for $220 million of term loan B borrowings and a $50 million five-year revolving credit facility. The special cash dividend
was paid on December 28, 2004.

We did not pay any cash dividends during fiscal 2003 and 2002. We have no present intention to declare
or pay any cash dividends on shares in the foreseeable future. Certain restrictive covenants contained in agreements governing our long-term indebtedness currently limit our ability to make dividend payments and certain other payments.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Restatements

Current Restatement

Lease Financing Obligations

We reviewed our accounting with respect to the depreciation of assets and recording of interest expense associated with lease financing
obligations related to sale-leaseback transactions required to be accounted for under the financing method. Under the financing method, the assets subject to these obligations remain on the consolidated balance sheet at their historical costs and
continue to be depreciated over their useful lives; the proceeds we received from the transaction are recorded as a lease financing obligation and the lease payments are applied as payments of principal and/or interest.

We previously considered the land and building as a single asset and depreciated this asset (both land and building) over a depreciable life that was
deemed to be the 20-year primary lease term of the underlying obligation. We have concluded that our prior accounting was in error and that the portion of the asset representing land should not be depreciated and the depreciation of the
building portion of this asset should continue using its original estimated useful life rather than the term of the underlying obligation. The effect of this restatement resulted in a reduction of depreciation expense of $2.0 million in each of the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and an increase to net income of $1.2 million, $1.2 million and $1.4 million in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

Historically, we allocated the related lease payments between interest and principal using an interest rate that would fully amortize the lease financing obligation by the end of the primary lease term. Due to the
change in depreciation described above, the assets subject to the lease financing obligations will have a net book value at the end of the primary lease term, primarily for the land portion. To prevent the recognition of a non-cash loss or
negative amortization of the obligation through the end of the primary lease term, it was necessary to reevaluate the selection of interest rates, which included our incremental borrowing rate, and to adjust the rates used to amortize the lease
financing obligations so that a lease obligation equal to or greater than the unamortized asset remained at the end of the primary lease term. The effect of this restatement resulted in an increase in interest expense and decrease in net income
related to the lease financing obligations of $2.7 million and $1.7 million in 2004, $2.5 million and $1.5 million in 2003 and $2.3 million and $1.1 million in 2002, respectively.

These restatements also resulted in an increase in the land and buildings subject to lease financing obligations of $11.4 million and an increase in
lease financing obligations of $14.6 million at December 31, 2004.

We also reviewed previously reported sale-leaseback transactions
and determined twelve additional real estate transactions were required to be recorded as financing transactions under SFAS No. 98 Accounting for Leases (SFAS No. 98) due to certain forms of continuing involvement.
The impact of this restatement is to keep the assets subject to such leases on the Companys balance sheet and to record the proceeds we received from these transactions (including the gains previously deferred) as lease financing obligations.
This restatement also affects our operating results by increasing the depreciation expense for buildings subject to these transactions and recharacterizing the lease payments, previously reported as rent expense for these restaurants, as interest
expense and principal repayments on the related financing obligations.

The effect of this restatement (a) for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was to (i) reduce rent expense, by $1.1 million, $0.6 million, and $0.3 million, respectively; (ii) increase depreciation expense by $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively,
(iii) increase interest expense by $1.3 million, $0.7 million and $0.3 million,



24



---

##### Table of Contents

respectively; and (iv) reduce net income by $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively; and (b) at December 31, 2004 and 2003, to
(i) increase the net book value of the land and buildings subject to lease financing obligations by $9.5 million and $6.6 million, respectively, (ii) reduce deferred income-sale/leaseback of real estate by $3.0 million and $2.2 million,
respectively, and (iii) increase lease financing obligations by $14.7 million and $10.2 million, respectively.

The net effect of the
above current restatements was to decrease net income $0.9 million, $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Deferred Taxes

We also reviewed deferred taxes recorded for certain long-lived assets and
liabilities that were previously acquired in business combinations and the related differences between the income tax bases and the financial reporting bases of these assets and liabilities and determined that the deferred taxes recorded at the
acquisition dates were incorrect. The result of these restatements was to decrease goodwill and deferred tax liabilities by $2.1 million in the aggregate related to our 2000 acquisition of Taco Cabana and to increase goodwill and deferred tax
liabilities by $0.6 million related to our 1998 acquisition of Pollo Tropical. This restatement also cumulatively decreased goodwill amortization expense $0.1 million for periods prior to 2002.

Statements of Cash Flows

The Company has corrected
its previously issued financial statements to reflect the proceeds from qualifying sale-leaseback transactions within investing activities rather than as financing activities as previously reported in the statements of cash flows. For the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, proceeds from qualifying sale-leaseback transactions included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements were $11.0 million, $44.2 million and $8.4 million, respectively. We have also restated
our consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 to reflect the impact of changes in accounts payable related to the acquisition of property and equipment as a non-cash item as required under SFAS
No. 95.

See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for a complete
discussion of the restatements, Selected Financial Data and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Amounts affected by these restatements that appear in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A have also been restated.

Previous Restatement

Lease and Leasehold Improvement Accounting

We reviewed our lease accounting policies following a host of announcements by
many restaurant and retail companies that they were revising their accounting practices for leases. We historically followed the accounting practice of using the initial lease term when determining operating versus capital lease classification and
when calculating straight-line rent expense. In addition, we depreciated our buildings on leased land and leasehold improvements over a period that included both the initial lease term plus one or more optional extension periods even if the option
renewal was not reasonably assured (or the useful life of the asset if shorter).

Upon such review, we restated our financial statements
for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the unaudited quarterly financial information for 2003 and the first three quarters of 2004 to correct errors in our lease accounting. Specifically, we revised our lease term for purposes of
lease classification and calculating straight-line rent expense to only include renewal options that are reasonably assured of exercise because an economic penalty, as defined under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13,
Accounting for Leases, (SFAS 13) would be incurred in the event of non-renewal. We also revised our useful lives of leasehold improvements to the shorter of their economic lives or the lease term as defined in SFAS 13. The
primary impact of the restatement was to accelerate depreciation of buildings on leased land and leasehold improvements made subsequent to the lease inception date. The restatement also reduced the lives of intangible assets related to leases. The
aggregate effect of these adjustments at December 31, 2004 was a reduction of the net book value of leasehold improvements of $13.8 million and a reduction of the net book value of intangible assets related to leases of $3.8 million.

In conjunction with the review of our lease accounting, we also determined that adjustments were also necessary to lease liabilities for
operating leases with non-level rents at the time of our acquisitions of Pollo Tropical in 1998 and Taco Cabana in 2000 as well as liabilities related to acquired leases with above-market rentals for Taco Cabana. We have adjusted our purchase price
allocations for these acquisitions and restated lease liabilities and goodwill as of the acquisition dates. We have also restated rent expense and interest expense for those previously reported periods subsequent to each acquisition and restated
goodwill amortization through December 31, 2001.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

As a result of these restatements rent expense increased $0.1 million in the first nine months of 2004,
$0.3 million in 2003 and $0.7 million in 2002.

Accounting for Franchise Rights

During the current year, we also reviewed our accounting policies for the amortization of franchise rights, intangible assets pertaining to our
acquisitions of Burger King restaurants, and determined that we made an error in the assessment of their remaining useful lives, as part of our adoption of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, (SFAS 142).
As of January 1, 2002, amounts allocated to franchise rights for each acquisition are now amortized prospectively from that date using the straight-line method over the remaining average term of the acquired franchise agreements at
January 1, 2002, plus one twenty-year renewal period. Previously, we amortized the amounts allocated to franchise rights over periods ranging from twenty to forty years.

In connection with the review of our accounting for franchise rights, we also determined that we understated the franchise rights and deferred tax
liabilities each by $14.0 million that pertained to an acquisition of 64 Burger King restaurants in 1997.

We have restated our financial
statements for these adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the unaudited quarterly financial information for 2003 and the first three quarters of 2004. The effect of the restatement was a reduction in amortization
expense of $0.5 million for the first three quarters of 2004 and $0.8 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

Stock-based
Compensation Expense

We reevaluated the terms of our option plans and grants and concluded that provisions of certain options granted
under our plans require us to account for these options using the variable accounting provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, (APB 25). Previously, we had
accounted for these options under APB 25 using a fixed accounting treatment whereby compensation expense, if any, was only evaluated at the date of the option grant. The most significant impact of this adjustment was to increase stock-based
compensation expense, included in general and administrative expenses, by $2.2 million in the first nine months of 2004.

Accounting for Guarantor
Financial Statements

In addition, we have restated our financial statements to correct the disclosure related to the Company and its
subsidiaries who guarantee certain of the Companys securities as of December 31, 2003 and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 to reflect the allocation of corporate costs and in addition, for the year ended
December 31, 2003, the calculation of income tax expense applicable to the Guarantor Subsidiaries. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following summary of selected financial data has been revised to reflect these restatements. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
original and current restatement adjustments for the years ended 2002, 2003 and 2004.

The following table sets forth our selected
consolidated financial data derived from our restated consolidated financial statements for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004. The information in the following table should be read together with our
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. Our acquisition of Taco Cabana was completed in late 2000 and, as a result, our financial data as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000 include the results of operations for Taco Cabana since December 20, 2000.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                                                                                                     |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------- | -------- | - | ----------------- | - | ------- | ----------------- |  | - | ----------------- | -- |  | ------------------ | ------- | -- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                                                                     |  | Year Ended December 31, |         
|                                                                                                                                     |  | (Restated)2000(1)       |          |   | (Restated)2001(1) |   |         | (Restated)2002(1) |  |   | (Restated)2003(1) |    |  | (Restated) 2004(1) |        
|                                                                                                                                     |  | (Dollars in thousands)  |         
|Statements of operations data:                                                                                                       |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Revenues:                                                                                                                            |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Restaurant sales                                                                                                                     |  | $                       | 465,862  |   |                   | $ | 654,710 |                   |  | $ | 655,545           |    |  | $                  | 643,579 |    |  | $ | 696,343 |  
|Franchise royalty revenues and fees                                                                                                  |  |                         | 1,039    |   |                   |   | 1,579   |                   |  |   | 1,482             |    |  |                    | 1,406   |    |  |   | 1,536   |  
|                                                                                                                                     |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Total revenues                                                                                                                       |  |                         | 466,901  |   |                   |   | 656,289 |                   |  |   | 657,027           |    |  |                    | 644,985 |    |  |   | 697,879 |  
|                                                                                                                                     |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Costs and expenses:                                                                                                                  |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Cost of sales                                                                                                                        |  |                         | 132,646  |   |                   |   | 189,947 |                   |  |   | 183,976           |    |  |                    | 181,182 |    |  |   | 202,624 |  
|Restaurant wages and related expenses                                                                                                |  |                         | 135,787  |   |                   |   | 192,918 |                   |  |   | 196,258           |    |  |                    | 194,315 |    |  |   | 206,732 |  
|Restaurant rent expense                                                                                                              |  |                         | 24,239   |   |                   |   | 31,459  |                   |  |   | 30,940            |    |  |                    | 31,089  |    |  |   | 34,606  |  
|Other restaurant operating expenses                                                                                                  |  |                         | 61,500   |   |                   |   | 86,435  |                   |  |   | 87,335            |    |  |                    | 89,880  |    |  |   | 92,891  |  
|Advertising expense                                                                                                                  |  |                         | 20,554   |   |                   |   | 28,830  |                   |  |   | 28,041            |    |  |                    | 27,351  |    |  |   | 24,711  |  
|General and administrative (including stock-based compensation expense (income) of $614, $101, $(151), $253 and $1,818
respectively) |  |                         | 27,017   |   |                   |   | 35,494  |                   |  |   | 36,459            |    |  |                    | 37,376  |    |  |   | 43,578  |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                                                                        |  |                         | 30,243   |   |                   |   | 45,461  |                   |  |   | 39,434            |    |  |                    | 40,228  |    |  |   | 38,521  |  
|Impairment losses                                                                                                                    |  |                         | 135      |   |                   |   | 578     |                   |  |   | 1,285             |    |  |                    | 4,151   |    |  |   | 1,544   |  
|Bonus to employees and director                                                                                                      |  |                         |         |   |                   |   |        |                   |  |   |                  |    |  |                    |        |    |  |   | 20,860  |  
|Other expense (income) (2)                                                                                                           |  |                         | (1,365   | ) |                   |   | 8,841   |                   |  |   |                  |    |  |                    |        |    |  |   | 2,320   |  
|                                                                                                                                     |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Total operating expenses                                                                                                             |  |                         | 430,756  |   |                   |   | 619,963 |                   |  |   | 603,728           |    |  |                    | 605,572 |    |  |   | 668,387 |  
|                                                                                                                                     |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Income from operations                                                                                                               |  |                         | 36,145   |   |                   |   | 36,326  |                   |  |   | 53,299            |    |  |                    | 39,413  |    |  |   | 29,492  |  
|Interest expense                                                                                                                     |  |                         | 31,099   |   |                   |   | 44,559  |                   |  |   | 39,329            |    |  |                    | 37,334  |    |  |   | 35,383  |  
|Loss on extinguishment of debt                                                                                                       |  |                         | 575      |   |                   |   |        |                   |  |   |                  |    |  |                    |        |    |  |   | 8,913   |  
|                                                                                                                                     |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Income (loss) before income taxes                                                                                                    |  |                         | 4,471    |   |                   |   | (8,233  | )                 |  |   | 13,970            |    |  |                    | 2,079   |    |  |   | (14,804 | )
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                                                                                                 |  |                         | 2,412    |   |                   |   | (1,428  | )                 |  |   | 4,929             |    |  |                    | 741     |    |  |   | (6,720  | )
|                                                                                                                                     |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Net income (loss)                                                                                                                    |  | $                       | 2,059    |   |                   | $ | (6,805  | )                 |  | $ | 9,041             |    |  | $                  | 1,338   |    |  | $ | (8,084  | )
|                                                                                                                                     |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Other financial data:                                                                                                                |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Cash provided from operating activities                                                                                              |  | $                       | 49,720   |   |                   | $ | 46,435  |                   |  | $ | 54,194            |    |  | $                  | 46,349  |    |  | $ | 59,211  |  
|Cash provided from (used for) investing activities                                                                                   |  |                         | (190,818 | ) |                   |   | (49,156 | )                 |  |   | (46,636           | )  |  |                    | 14,581  |    |  |   | (8,489  | )
|Cash provided from (used for) financing activities                                                                                   |  |                         | 141,909  |   |                   |   | 2,414   |                   |  |   | (7,425            | )  |  |                    | (61,054 | )  |  |   | (21,670 | )
|Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions                                                                                         |  |                         | 36,157   |   |                   |   | 47,575  |                   |  |   | 54,155            |    |  |                    | 30,371  |    |  |   | 19,073  |  
|Consolidated EBITDA, as defined (3) (4)                                                                                              |  |                         | 65,158   |   |                   |   | 89,418  |                   |  |   | 94,018            |    |  |                    | 83,792  |    |  |   | 69,557  |  
|                                                                                                                                     |  |                         |          |   |                  
|Operating statistics:                                                                                                                |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Total number of restaurants (at end of period)                                                                                       |  |                         | 521      |   |                   |   | 532     |                   |  |   | 529               |    |  |                    | 532     |    |  |   | 537     |  
|                                                                                                                                     |  |                         |          |   |                  
|Taco Cabana (6):                                                                                                                     |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Number of restaurants (at end of period)                                                                                             |  |                         | 117      |   |                   |   | 120     |                   |  |   | 116               |    |  |                    | 121     |    |  |   | 126     |  
|Average number of restaurants                                                                                                        |  |                         | 112.8    |   |                   |   | 120.3   |                   |  |   | 114.6             |    |  |                    | 118.9   |    |  |   | 123.9   |  
|Revenues:                                                                                                                            |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Restaurant sales                                                                                                                     |  | $                       | 170,315  |   |                   | $ | 177,398 |                   |  | $ | 174,982           |    |  | $                  | 181,068 |    |  | $ | 202,506 |  
|Franchise royalty revenues and fees                                                                                                  |  |                         | 376      |   |                   |   | 405     |                   |  |   | 429               |    |  |                    | 413     |    |  |   | 435     |  
|                                                                                                                                     |  |                         |          |   |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                    |         |    |  |   |         |  
|Total revenues                                                                                                                       |  |                         | 170,691  |   |                   |   | 177,803 |                   |  |   | 175,411           |    |  |                    | 181,481 |    |  |   | 202,941 |  
|Average annual sales per restaurant (7)                                                                                              |  |                         | 1,510    |   |                   |   | 1,475   |                   |  |   | 1,527             |    |  |                    | 1,523   |    |  |   | 1,604   |  
|Segment EBITDA                                                                                                                       |  |                         | 25,685   |   |                   |   | 26,032  |                   |  |   | 27,989            |    |  |                    | 24,206  |    |  |   | 30,082  |  
|Segment EBITDA margin (5)                                                                                                            |  |                         | 15.0     | % |                   |   | 14.6    | %                 |  |   | 16.0              | %  |  |                    | 13.3    | %  |  |   | 14.8    | %
|Change in comparable restaurant sales (8)                                                                                            |  |                         | 3.4      | % |                   |   | 1.6     | %                 |  |   | (0.2              | )% |  |                    | (3.0    | )% |  |   | 4.8     | %



27



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                          |  |                         |         |    |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                   |         |    |  |   |          |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- | -- | ----------------- | - | ------- | ----------------- |  | - | ----------------- | -- |  | ----------------- | ------- | -- |  | - | -------- | -
|                                          |  | Year ended December 31, |        
|                                          |  | (Restated)2000(1)       |         |    | (Restated)2001(1) |   |         | (Restated)2002(1) |  |   | (Restated)2003(1) |    |  | (Restated)2004(1) |        
|                                          |  | (Dollars in thousands)  |        
|Pollo Tropical:                           |  |                         |         |    |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                   |         |    |  |   |          |  
|Number of restaurants (at end of period)  |  |                         | 49      |    |                   |   | 53      |                   |  |   | 58                |    |  |                   | 60      |    |  |   | 63       |  
|Average number of restaurants             |  |                         | 45.6    |    |                   |   | 50.4    |                   |  |   | 55.6              |    |  |                   | 59.4    |    |  |   | 60.3     |  
|Revenues:                                 |  |                         |         |    |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                   |         |    |  |   |          |  
|Restaurant sales                          |  | $                       | 88,976  |    |                   | $ | 96,437  |                   |  | $ | 100,444           |    |  | $                 | 109,201 |    |  | $ | 124,000  |  
|Franchise royalty revenues and fees       |  |                         | 1,028   |    |                   |   | 1,174   |                   |  |   | 1,053             |    |  |                   | 993     |    |  |   | 1,101    |  
|                                          |  |                         |         |    |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                   |         |    |  |   |          |  
|Total revenues                            |  |                         | 90,004  |    |                   |   | 97,611  |                   |  |   | 101,497           |    |  |                   | 110,194 |    |  |   | 125,101  |  
|Average annual sales per restaurant (7)   |  |                         | 1,951   |    |                   |   | 1,913   |                   |  |   | 1,807             |    |  |                   | 1,838   |    |  |   | 2,018    |  
|Segment EBITDA                            |  |                         | 20,857  |    |                   |   | 21,987  |                   |  |   | 21,946            |    |  |                   | 22,489  |    |  |   | 27,891   |  
|Segment EBITDA margin (5)                 |  |                         | 23.2    | %  |                   |   | 22.5    | %                 |  |   | 21.6              | %  |  |                   | 20.4    | %  |  |   | 22.3     | %
|Change in comparable restaurant sales (8) |  |                         | 1.7     | %  |                   |   | (0.3    | )%                |  |   | (4.2              | )% |  |                   | 2.3     | %  |  |   | 10.6     | %
|                                          |  |                         |         |    |                  
|Burger King:                              |  |                         |         |    |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                   |         |    |  |   |          |  
|Number of restaurants (at end of period)  |  |                         | 355     |    |                   |   | 359     |                   |  |   | 355               |    |  |                   | 351     |    |  |   | 348      |  
|Average number of restaurants             |  |                         | 352.1   |    |                   |   | 353.3   |                   |  |   | 355.6             |    |  |                   | 352.2   |    |  |   | 350.9    |  
|Restaurant sales                          |  | $                       | 371,335 |    |                   | $ | 380,875 |                   |  | $ | 380,119           |    |  | $                 | 353,310 |    |  | $ | 369,837  |  
|Average annual sales per restaurant (7)   |  |                         | 1,055   |    |                   |   | 1,078   |                   |  |   | 1,069             |    |  |                   | 1,003   |    |  |   | 1,054    |  
|Segment EBITDA                            |  |                         | 44,040  |    |                   |   | 43,288  |                   |  |   | 43,932            |    |  |                   | 37,350  |    |  |   | 36,582   |  
|Segment EBITDA margin (5)                 |  |                         | 11.9    | %  |                   |   | 11.4    | %                 |  |   | 11.6              | %  |  |                   | 10.6    | %  |  |   | 9.9      | %
|Change in comparable restaurant sales (8) |  |                         | (2.5    | )% |                   |   | 1.3     | %                 |  |   | (1.3              | )% |  |                   | (7.2    | )% |  |   | 2.9      | %
|                                          |  |                         |         |    |                  
|Balance sheet data (at end of period):    |  |                         |         |    |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                   |         |    |  |   |          |  
|Total assets                              |  | $                       | 557,698 |    |                   | $ | 552,884 |                   |  | $ | 554,787           |    |  | $                 | 499,054 |    |  | $ | 516,246  |  
|Working capital                           |  |                         | (27,006 | )  |                   |   | (34,362 | )                 |  |   | (33,971           | )  |  |                   | (39,835 | )  |  |   | (24,515  | )
|Debt:                                     |  |                         |         |    |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                   |         |    |  |   |          |  
|Senior and senior subordinated debt       |  | $                       | 365,600 |    |                   | $ | 368,500 |                   |  | $ | 357,300           |    |  | $                 | 294,100 |    |  | $ | 400,000  |  
|Capital leases and other debt             |  |                         | 4,971   |    |                   |   | 4,575   |                   |  |   | 3,045             |    |  |                   | 1,732   |    |  |   | 1,225    |  
|Lease financing obligations               |  |                         | 96,139  |    |                   |   | 96,660  |                   |  |   | 102,738           |    |  |                   | 106,808 |    |  |   | 111,715  |  
|                                          |  |                         |         |    |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                   |         |    |  |   |          |  
|Total debt                                |  | $                       | 466,710 |    |                   | $ | 469,735 |                   |  | $ | 463,083           |    |  | $                 | 402,640 |    |  | $ | 512,940  |  
|                                          |  |                         |         |    |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                   |         |    |  |   |          |  
|Stockholders equity (deficit)            |  | $                       | 5,775   |    |                   | $ | (1,030  | )                 |  | $ | 8,011             |    |  | $                 | 9,349   |    |  | $ | (115,529 | )
|                                          |  |                         |         |    |                   |   |         |                   |  |   |                   |    |  |                   |         |    |  |   |          |  

---

|(1) | The restatement adjustments affecting fiscal years 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are set forth in the following table:
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



28



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                   |  |                         |         |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |                      |   |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------- | -------------------- |  | - | -------------------- | - |  | -------------------- | ------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                   |  | Year Ended December 31, |        
|                                                   |  | 2000                    |         |   | 2001                 |  
|                                                   |  | AsPreviouslyReported    |         |   | AsPreviouslyRestated |   |         | AsCurrently Restated |  |   | AsPreviouslyReported |   |  | AsPreviouslyRestated |         |   | AsCurrently Restated |  
|                                                   |  | (Dollars in thousands)  |        
|Statements of operations data:                     |  |                         |         |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |                      |   |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Restaurant rent expense                            |  | $                       | 24,187  |   |                      | $ | 24,315  |                      |  | $ | 24,239               |   |  | $                    | 31,207  |   |                      | $ | 31,531  |   |  | $ | 31,459  |  
|General and administrative expense                 |  |                         | 26,403  |   |                      |   | 27,017  |                      |  |   | 27,017               |   |  |                      | 35,393  |   |                      |   | 35,494  |   |  |   | 35,494  |  
|Depreciation and amortization                      |  |                         | 30,805  |   |                      |   | 31,348  |                      |  |   | 30,243               |   |  |                      | 45,958  |   |                      |   | 47,565  |   |  |   | 45,461  |  
|Total operating expenses                           |  |                         | 430,652 |   |                      |   | 431,937 |                      |  |   | 430,756              |   |  |                      | 620,107 |   |                      |   | 622,139 |   |  |   | 619,963 |  
|Income from operations                             |  |                         | 36,249  |   |                      |   | 34,964  |                      |  |   | 36,145               |   |  |                      | 36,182  |   |                      |   | 34,150  |   |  |   | 36,326  |  
|Interest expense                                   |  |                         | 29,571  |   |                      |   | 29,571  |                      |  |   | 31,099               |   |  |                      | 41,982  |   |                      |   | 42,322  |   |  |   | 44,559  |  
|Income (loss) before income taxes                  |  |                         | 6,103   |   |                      |   | 4,818   |                      |  |   | 4,471                |   |  |                      | (5,800  | ) |                      |   | (8,172  | ) |  |   | (8,233  | )
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes               |  |                         | 3,407   |   |                      |   | 2,551   |                      |  |   | 2,412                |   |  |                      | 274     |   |                      |   | (1,405  | ) |  |   | (1,428  | )
|Net income (loss)                                  |  |                         | 2,696   |   |                      |   | 2,267   |                      |  |   | 2,059                |   |  |                      | (6,074  | ) |                      |   | (6,767  | ) |  |   | (6,805  | )
|                                                   |  |                         |         |   |                      |  
|Other financial data:                              |  |                         |         |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |                      |   |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash provided from operating activities            |  | $                       | 50,862  |   |                      | $ | 50,862  |                      |  | $ | 49,720               |   |  | $                    | 47,968  |   |                      | $ | 47,968  |   |  | $ | 46,435  |  
|Cash provided from (used for) financing activities |  |                         | 140,767 |   |                      |   | 140,767 |                      |  |   | 141,909              |   |  |                      | 881     |   |                      |   | 881     |   |  |   | 2,414   |  
|                                                   |  |                         |         |   |                      |  
|Balance sheet data (at end of period):             |  |                         |         |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |                      |   |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Total assets                                       |  | $                       | 557,825 |   |                      | $ | 553,231 |                      |  | $ | 557,698              |   |  | $                    | 550,954 |   |                      | $ | 546,387 |   |  | $ | 552,884 |  
|Working capital                                    |  |                         | (28,539 | ) |                      |   | (28,539 | )                    |  |   | (27,006              | ) |  |                      | (36,131 | ) |                      |   | (36,131 | ) |  |   | (34,362 | )
|Total debt                                         |  |                         | 461,142 |   |                      |   | 461,142 |                      |  |   | 466,710              |   |  |                      | 462,115 |   |                      |   | 462,115 |   |  |   | 469,735 |  
|Stockholders equity (deficit)                     |  |                         | 14,962  |   |                      |   | 7,298   |                      |  |   | 5,775                |   |  |                      | 8,888   |   |                      |   | 531     |   |  |   | (1,030  | )



|                                                   |  |                         |         |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |                      |   |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------- | -------------------- |  | - | -------------------- | - |  | -------------------- | ------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                   |  | Year Ended December 31, |        
|                                                   |  | 2002                    |         |   | 2003                 |  
|                                                   |  | AsPreviouslyReported    |         |   | AsPreviouslyRestated |   |         | AsCurrently Restated |  |   | AsPreviouslyReported |   |  | AsPreviouslyRestated |         |   | AsCurrently Restated |  
|                                                   |  | (Dollars in thousands)  |        
|Statements of operations data:                     |  |                         |         |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |                      |   |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Restaurant rent expense                            |  | $                       | 30,494  |   |                      | $ | 31,187  |                      |  | $ | 30,940               |   |  | $                    | 31,383  |   |                      | $ | 31,710  |   |  | $ | 31,089  |  
|General and administrative expense                 |  |                         | 36,610  |   |                      |   | 36,459  |                      |  |   | 36,459               |   |  |                      | 37,123  |   |                      |   | 37,376  |   |  |   | 37,376  |  
|Depreciation and amortization                      |  |                         | 41,329  |   |                      |   | 41,352  |                      |  |   | 39,434               |   |  |                      | 41,657  |   |                      |   | 42,008  |   |  |   | 40,228  |  
|Total operating expenses                           |  |                         | 605,328 |   |                      |   | 605,893 |                      |  |   | 603,728              |   |  |                      | 607,042 |   |                      |   | 607,973 |   |  |   | 605,572 |  
|Income from operations                             |  |                         | 51,699  |   |                      |   | 51,134  |                      |  |   | 53,299               |   |  |                      | 37,943  |   |                      |   | 37,012  |   |  |   | 39,413  |  
|Interest expense                                   |  |                         | 36,392  |   |                      |   | 36,700  |                      |  |   | 39,329               |   |  |                      | 33,808  |   |                      |   | 34,069  |   |  |   | 37,334  |  
|Income before income taxes                         |  |                         | 15,307  |   |                      |   | 14,434  |                      |  |   | 13,970               |   |  |                      | 4,135   |   |                      |   | 2,943   |   |  |   | 2,079   |  
|Provision for income taxes                         |  |                         | 5,593   |   |                      |   | 5,169   |                      |  |   | 4,929                |   |  |                      | 1,767   |   |                      |   | 1,124   |   |  |   | 741     |  
|Net income                                         |  |                         | 9,714   |   |                      |   | 9,265   |                      |  |   | 9,041                |   |  |                      | 2,368   |   |                      |   | 1,819   |   |  |   | 1,338   |  
|                                                   |  |                         |         |   |                      |  
|Other financial data:                              |  |                         |         |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |                      |   |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash provided from operating activities            |  | $                       | 55,964  |   |                      | $ | 55,964  |                      |  | $ | 54,194               |   |  | $                    | 48,239  |   |                      | $ | 48,239  |   |  | $ | 46,349  |  
|Cash provided from (used for) investing activities |  |                         | (55,071 | ) |                      |   | (55,071 | )                    |  |   | (46,636              | ) |  |                      | (29,472 | ) |                      |   | (29,472 | ) |  |   | 14,581  |  
|Cash used for financing activities                 |  |                         | (760    | ) |                      |   | (760    | )                    |  |   | (7,425               | ) |  |                      | (18,891 | ) |                      |   | (18,891 | ) |  |   | (61,054 | )
|                                                   |  |                         |         |   |                      |  
|Balance sheet data (at end of period):             |  |                         |         |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |                      |   |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Total assets                                       |  | $                       | 546,296 |   |                      | $ | 541,626 |                      |  | $ | 554,787              |   |  | $                    | 486,080 |   |                      | $ | 481,386 |   |  | $ | 499,054 |  
|Working capital                                    |  |                         | (35,988 | ) |                      |   | (35,988 | )                    |  |   | (33,971              | ) |  |                      | (42,123 | ) |                      |   | (42,123 | ) |  |   | (39,835 | )
|Total debt                                         |  |                         | 447,047 |   |                      |   | 447,047 |                      |  |   | 463,083              |   |  |                      | 380,517 |   |                      |   | 380,517 |   |  |   | 402,640 |  
|Stockholders equity                               |  |                         | 18,602  |   |                      |   | 9,796   |                      |  |   | 8,011                |   |  |                      | 20,970  |   |                      |   | 11,615  |   |  |   | 9,349   |  



29



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                        |  |                             |          |   |             |   |          |  
|--------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | -------- | - | ----------- | - | -------- | -
|                                        |  | Year Ended December 31,2004 |         
|                                        |  | AsPreviouslyReported        |          |   | As Restated |  
|                                        |  | (Dollars in thousands)      |         
|Statements of operations data:          |  |                             |          |   |             |   |          |  
|Restaurant rent expense                 |  | $                           | 35,699   |   |             | $ | 34,606   |  
|Depreciation and amortization           |  |                             | 40,180   |   |             |   | 38,521   |  
|Total operating expense                 |  |                             | 671,139  |   |             |   | 668,387  |  
|Income from operations                  |  |                             | 26,740   |   |             |   | 29,492   |  
|Interest expense                        |  |                             | 31,320   |   |             |   | 35,383   |  
|Loss before income taxes                |  |                             | (13,493  | ) |             |   | (14,804  | )
|Benefit for income taxes                |  |                             | (6,288   | ) |             |   | (6,720   | )
|Net loss                                |  |                             | (7,205   | ) |             |   | (8,084   | )
|                                        |  |                            
|Other financial data:                   |  |                             |          |   |             |   |          |  
|Cash provided from operating activities |  | $                           | 62,652   |   |             | $ | 59,211   |  
|Cash used for investing activities      |  |                             | (20,626  | ) |             |   | (8,489   | )
|Cash used for financing activities      |  |                             | (12,974  | ) |             |   | (21,670  | )
|                                        |  |                            
|Balance sheet data (at end of period):  |  |                             |          |   |             |   |          |  
|Total assets                            |  | $                           | 493,072  |   |             | $ | 516,246  |  
|Working capital                         |  |                             | (27,110  | ) |             |   | (24,515  | )
|Total debt                              |  |                             | 483,622  |   |             |   | 512,940  |  
|Stockholders deficit                   |  |                             | (112,384 | ) |             |   | (115,529 | )

The previous restatement adjustments affecting fiscal years 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 were to
accelerate the depreciation of buildings and improvements on leased land and intangible assets related to leases, increase rent expense, increase interest expense and decrease goodwill amortization due to adjustments of the purchase price
allocations for the Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana acquisitions, and to record stock-based compensation expense from variable stock awards included in general and administrative expense. The cumulative effect of these adjustments affecting periods
prior to fiscal 2000 is reflected as a decrease of $7.2 million to our accumulated deficit at December 31, 1999. In addition, the restatement adjustments also include a reduction in amortization expense of Burger King franchise rights of $0.5
million for the first three quarters of 2004 and $0.8 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.

The current restatement adjustments affecting fiscal years 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were to reduce depreciation expense for the land portion of
lease financing obligation assets and increase interest expense on the lease financing obligations; decrease rent expense, increase interest expense and increase depreciation expense for twelve real estate transactions required to be recorded as
financing transactions; reclassify proceeds from qualifying sale-leaseback transactions from a financing activity to an investing activity on the statements of cash flows; and adjust capital expenditures, net cash used for investing activities and
net cash provided from operations for the change in the amount of capital expenditures included in accounts payable at the beginning and end of each year. The cumulative effect of these adjustments affecting periods prior to fiscal 2000 is reflected
as a decrease of $1.3 million to our accumulated deficit at December 31, 1999. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.



|(2) | Other income in 2000 was from the recognition of previously deferred contractual payments received from Ameriserve Food Distribution, Inc., which was recognized upon termination of
the related supply agreement in 2000. Other expense in 2001 resulted from the closure of seven Taco Cabana restaurants in the Phoenix, Arizona market and the discontinuance of restaurant development in that market. Other expense in 2004 resulted
from the write off of costs incurred in connection with a registration statement on Form S-1 for an offering of Enhanced Yield Securities and senior subordinated notes by Carrols Holdings that was withdrawn on October 25, 2004. See Note 9 to
the consolidated financial statements.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Consolidated EBITDA includes a charge in 2001 of $1.8 million resulting from the closure of seven Taco Cabana restaurants in the Phoenix, Arizona market and the discontinuance of
restaurant development in that market. Consolidated EBITDA in 2004 has been reduced by $2.3 million for the write off of costs associated with a registration statement on Form S-1 which was withdrawn and by $20.9 million for a bonus paid to
employees and a director (See Notes 9 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements).
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



30



---

##### Table of Contents

|(4) | Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------

Consolidated EBITDA is defined as income before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, impairment losses, and non-cash other income and expense. Consolidated EBITDA is presented because we believe it is a useful financial
indicator for the ability, on a consolidated basis, to service and/or incur indebtedness. However, Consolidated EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to consolidated cash flows as a measure of liquidity in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Consolidated EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to differences in methods of calculation. Management believes the most directly comparable measure to
Consolidated EBITDA calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles is net cash provided from operating activities.

A reconciliation of consolidated EBITDA to net cash provided from operating activities is presented below:



|                                                                                             |  |                         |         |   |                 |   |         |                 |  |   |                 |   |  |                 |         |   |  |   |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- | - | --------------- | - | ------- | --------------- |  | - | --------------- | - |  | --------------- | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                             |  | Year Ended December 31, |        
|(Dollars in thousands)                                                                       |  | (Restated) 2000         |         |   | (Restated) 2001 |   |         | (Restated) 2002 |  |   | (Restated) 2003 |   |  | (Restated) 2004 |        
|Consolidated EBITDA, as defined                                                              |  | $                       | 65,158  |   |                 | $ | 89,418  |                 |  | $ | 94,018          |   |  | $               | 83,792  |   |  | $ | 69,557  |  
|Adjustments to reconcile Consolidated EBITDA to net cash provided from operating activities: |  |                         |         |   |                 |   |         |                 |  |   |                 |   |  |                 |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Loss (gain) on sale of assets                                                                |  |                         |        |   |                 |   | 390     |                 |  |   | 24              |   |  |                 | (386    | ) |  |   | (176    | )
|Interest expense                                                                             |  |                         | (31,099 | ) |                 |   | (44,559 | )               |  |   | (39,329         | ) |  |                 | (37,334 | ) |  |   | (35,383 | )
|Amortization of deferred financing costs                                                     |  |                         | 791     |   |                 |   | 1,527   |                 |  |   | 1,528           |   |  |                 | 1,540   |   |  |   | 1,527   |  
|Accretion of interest on lease financing obligations                                         |  |                         | 231     |   |                 |   | 521     |                 |  |   | 478             |   |  |                 | 443     |   |  |   | 406     |  
|Benefit (provision) for income taxes                                                         |  |                         | (2,412  | ) |                 |   | 1,428   |                 |  |   | (4,929          | ) |  |                 | (741    | ) |  |   | 6,720   |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                                        |  |                         | 1,118   |   |                 |   | (3,117  | )               |  |   | 4,888           |   |  |                 | (1,156  | ) |  |   | (6,467  | )
|Change in operating assets and liabilities                                                   |  |                         | 15,933  |   |                 |   | (961    | )               |  |   | (2,484          | ) |  |                 | 191     |   |  |   | 23,027  |  
|Other expense (a)                                                                            |  |                         |        |   |                 |   | 1,788   |                 |  |   |                |   |  |                 |        |   |  |   |        |  
|                                                                                             |  |                         |         |   |                 |   |         |                 |  |   |                 |   |  |                 |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net cash provided from operating activities                                                  |  | $                       | 49,720  |   |                 | $ | 46,435  |                 |  | $ | 54,194          |   |  | $               | 46,349  |   |  | $ | 59,211  |  
|                                                                                             |  |                         |         |   |                 |   |         |                 |  |   |                 |   |  |                 |         |   |  |   |         |  

---

|(a) | Reflects occupancy and other exit costs related to the closure of seven Taco Cabana restaurants in the first quarter of 2001.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | Segment EBITDA margin is derived by dividing Segment EBITDA by total revenues applicable to the segment shown above.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | Taco Cabana was acquired in late 2000. Average restaurants, average sales and comparable sales data for periods prior to the acquisition are presented for informational purposes
only.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | Average annual (52 weeks) sales per restaurant are derived by dividing restaurant sales for the applicable year by the average number of restaurants for the applicable year.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(8) | The change in comparable restaurant sales is calculated using only those restaurants that have been open since the beginning of the earliest period being compared (12 months for
Burger King and 18 months for Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana).
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

We are one of the largest restaurant companies in the United States operating three restaurant brands in the quick-casual and quick-service restaurant segments with 537 company owned and operated restaurants in 17
states as of December 31, 2004. We own, operate and franchise two Hispanic restaurant brands, Taco Cabana®and Pollo Tropical®) operating primarily in Texas and Florida,
respectively. We are also the largest Burger King®franchisee and have operated Burger
King restaurants since 1976.

We use a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31. For convenience, all
references herein to the fiscal years ended December 29, 2002, December 28, 2003 and January 2, 2005 will hereinafter be referred to as the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Our fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 included 53 weeks. Our fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 each included 52 weeks.



31



---

##### Table of Contents

Recent Developments

Effective May 3, 2005, Holdings issued an aggregate of 260,600 shares of Holdings common stock in exchange for the cancellation and termination of an identical number of outstanding options to purchase
shares of Holdings common stock. As a consequence of the exchange, all outstanding stock options were cancelled and terminated. All shares were issued pursuant to stock award agreements, effective May 3, 2005, which provide that such
shares are fully vested and non-forfeitable upon issuance, but may not be sold or otherwise disposed of for a period of two years from the date of issuance. Such agreements also provide that up to an aggregate of 16% of each recipients shares
(for those recipients that were issued 100 or more shares) are subject to repurchase by Carrols Holdings (at its option) after December 31, 2006 under certain circumstances described in the award agreements. In addition, such shares may be
subject to repurchase by Carrols Holdings (at its option) in the event of a termination of employment before the occurrence of certain events. The Company expects to record a compensation charge in the second quarter of 2005 relative to these stock
awards.

Restatements

Current Restatement

Lease Financing Obligations

We
reviewed our accounting with respect to the depreciation of assets and recording of interest expense associated with lease financing obligations related to sale-leaseback transactions required to be accounted for under the financing method. Under
the financing method, the assets subject to these obligations remain on the consolidated balance sheet at their historical costs and continue to be depreciated over their useful lives; the proceeds we received from the transaction are recorded as a
lease financing obligation and the lease payments are applied as payments of principal and/or interest.

We previously considered the land
and building as a single asset and depreciated this asset (both land and building) over a depreciable life that was deemed to be the 20-year primary lease term of the underlying obligation. We have concluded that our prior accounting was in
error and that the portion of the asset representing land should not be depreciated and the depreciation of the building portion of this asset should continue using its original estimated useful life rather than the term of the underlying
obligation. The effect of this restatement resulted in a reduction of depreciation expense of $2.0 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and an increase to net income of $1.2 million, $1.2 million and $1.4 million
in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Historically, we allocated the related lease payments between interest and principal using an
interest rate that would fully amortize the lease financing obligation by the end of the primary lease term. Due to the change in depreciation described above, the assets subject to the lease financing obligations will have a net book value at the
end of the primary lease term, primarily for the land portion. To prevent the recognition of a non-cash loss or negative amortization of the obligation through the end of the primary lease term, it was necessary to reevaluate the selection of
interest rates, which included our incremental borrowing rate, and to adjust the rates used to amortize the lease financing obligations so that a lease obligation equal to or greater than the unamortized asset remained at the end of the primary
lease term. The effect of this restatement resulted in an increase in interest expense and decrease in net income related to the lease financing obligations of $2.7 and $1.7 million million in 2004, $2.5 million and $1.5 million in 2003 and $2.3
million and $1.1 million in 2002, respectively.

These restatements also resulted in an increase in the land and buildings subject to lease
financing obligations of $11.4 million and an increase in lease financing obligations of $14.6 million at December 31, 2004.

We also
reviewed previously reported sale-leaseback transactions and determined twelve additional real estate transactions were required to be recorded as financing transactions under SFAS No. 98 Accounting for Leases (SFAS
No. 98) due to certain forms of continuing involvement. The impact of this restatement is to keep the assets subject to such leases on the Companys balance sheet and to record the proceeds we received from these transactions
(including the gains previously deferred) as lease financing obligations. This restatement also affects our operating results by increasing the depreciation expense for buildings subject to these transactions and recharacterizing the lease payments,
previously reported as rent expense for these restaurants, as interest expense and principal repayments on the related financing obligations.

The effect of this restatement (a) for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was to (i) reduce rent expense, by $1.1 million, $0.6 million, and $0.3 million, respectively; (ii) increase depreciation expense by
$0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and (iii) increase interest expense by $1.3 million, $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively; and (iv) reduce net income by $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million,
respectively; and (b) at December 31, 2004 and 2003, to (i) increase the net book value of the land and buildings subject to lease financing obligations by $9.5 million and $6.6 million, respectively, (ii) reduce deferred
income-sale/leaseback of real estate by $3.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and (iii) increase lease financing obligations by $14.7 million and $10.2 million, respectively.



32



---

##### Table of Contents

The net effect of the above current restatements was to decrease net income $0.9 million, $0.5 million
and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Deferred Taxes

We also reviewed deferred taxes recorded for certain long-lived assets and liabilities that were previously acquired in business combinations and the
related differences between the income tax bases and the financial reporting bases of these assets and liabilities and determined that the deferred taxes recorded at the acquisition dates were incorrect. The result of these restatements was to
decrease goodwill and deferred tax liabilities by $2.1 million in the aggregate related to our 2000 acquisition of Taco Cabana and to increase goodwill and deferred tax liabilities by $0.6 million related to our 1998 acquisition of Pollo Tropical.
This restatement also cumulatively decreased goodwill amortization expense $0.1 million for periods prior to 2002.

Statements of Cash Flows

The Company has corrected its previously issued financial statements to reflect the proceeds from qualifying sale-leaseback
transactions within investing activities rather than as financing activities as previously reported in the statements of cash flows. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, proceeds from qualifying sale-leaseback transactions
included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements were $11.0 million, $44.2 million and $8.4 million, respectively. We have also restated our consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 to reflect the impact of changes in accounts payable related to the acquisition of property and equipment as a non-cash item as required under SFAS No. 95.

See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for a complete discussion of the restatements, Selected Financial Data and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Amounts affected by these restatements that appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A have also been restated.

Previous Restatement

Lease and Leasehold Improvement Accounting

We reviewed our lease accounting policies following a host of announcements by many restaurant and retail companies that they were
revising their accounting practices for leases. We historically followed the accounting practice of using the initial lease term when determining operating versus capital lease classification and when calculating straight-line rent expense. In
addition, we depreciated our buildings on leased land and leasehold improvements over a period that included both the initial lease term plus one or more optional extension periods even if the option renewal was not reasonably assured (or the useful
life of the asset if shorter).

Upon such review, we restated our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
and the unaudited quarterly financial information for 2003 and the first three quarters of 2004 to correct errors in our lease accounting. Specifically, we revised our lease term for purposes of lease classification and calculating straight-line
rent expense to only include renewal options that are reasonably assured of exercise because an economic penalty, as defined under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for Leases, (SFAS 13)
would be incurred in the event of non-renewal. We also revised our useful lives of leasehold improvements to the shorter of their economic lives or the lease term as defined in SFAS 13. The primary impact of the restatement was to accelerate
depreciation of buildings on leased land and leasehold improvements made subsequent to the lease inception date. The restatement also reduced the lives of intangible assets related to leases. The aggregate effect of these adjustments at
December 31, 2004 was a reduction of the net book value of leasehold improvements of $13.8 million and a reduction of the net book value of intangible assets related to leases of $3.8 million.

In conjunction with the review of our lease accounting, we also determined that adjustments were also necessary to lease liabilities for operating leases
with non-level rents at the time of our acquisitions of Pollo Tropical in 1998 and Taco Cabana in 2000 as well as liabilities related to acquired leases with above-market rentals for Taco Cabana. We have adjusted our purchase price allocations for
these acquisitions and restated lease liabilities and goodwill as of the acquisition dates. We have also restated rent expense and interest expense for those previously reported periods subsequent to each acquisition and restated goodwill
amortization through December 31, 2001.

As a result of these restatements rent expense increased $0.1 million in the first nine
months of 2004, $0.3 million in 2003 and $0.7 million in 2002.



33



---

##### Table of Contents

Accounting for Franchise Rights

During the current year, we also reviewed our accounting policies for the amortization of franchise rights, intangible assets pertaining to our acquisitions of Burger King restaurants, and determined that we made an
error in the assessment of their remaining useful lives, as part of our adoption of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, (SFAS 142). As of January 1, 2002, amounts allocated to franchise rights for
each acquisition are now amortized prospectively from that date using the straight-line method over the remaining average term of the acquired franchise agreements at January 1, 2002, plus one twenty-year renewal period. Previously, we
amortized the amounts allocated to franchise rights over periods ranging from twenty to forty years.

In connection with the review of our
accounting for franchise rights, we also determined that we understated the franchise rights and deferred tax liabilities each by $14.0 million that pertained to an acquisition of 64 Burger King restaurants in 1997.

We have restated our financial statements for these adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the unaudited quarterly financial
information for 2003 and the first three quarters of 2004. The effect of the restatement was a reduction in amortization expense of $0.5 million for the first three quarters of 2004 and $0.8 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2003
and 2002.

Stock-based Compensation Expense

We reevaluated the terms of our option plans and grants and concluded that provisions of certain options granted under our plans require us to account for these options using the variable accounting provisions of Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, (APB 25). Previously, we had accounted for these options under APB 25 using a fixed accounting treatment whereby compensation expense, if any, was only evaluated
at the date of the option grant. The most significant impact of this adjustment was to increase stock-based compensation expense, included in general and administrative expenses, by $2.2 million in the first nine months of 2004.

Accounting for Guarantor Financial Statements

In
addition, we have restated our financial statements to correct the disclosure related to the Company and its subsidiaries who guarantee certain of the Companys securities as of December 31, 2003 and for the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2002 to reflect the allocation of corporate costs and in addition, for the year ended December 31, 2003, the calculation of income tax expense applicable to the Guarantor Subsidiaries. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.

See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for a complete
discussion of the restatements. All previously reported amounts that appear in our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below have also been restated to report the revised amounts.

Significant Accounting Policies

Financial Reporting
Release No. 72 requires all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The following is a brief discussion of the more significant accounting
policies and methods used by us.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires us to make assumptions and estimates that can have a material impact on our results of operations. Sales recognition at company-operated restaurants is straightforward as customers pay for products at
the time of sale and inventory turns over very quickly. Payments to vendors for products sold in the restaurants are generally settled within 30 days. The earnings reporting process is covered by our system of internal controls, and generally does
not require significant management estimates and judgments. However, estimates and judgments, as noted below, are inherent in the assessment and recording of accrued occupancy costs, insurance liabilities, legal obligations, income taxes and the
valuation of goodwill and intangible assets for impairment. While we apply our judgment based on assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, actual results could vary from these assumptions. It is possible that materially
different amounts would be reported using different assumptions.

Accrued Occupancy Costs. We make estimates of accrued occupancy
costs pertaining to closed restaurant locations on an ongoing basis. These estimates require assessment and continuous evaluation of a number of factors such as the remaining contractual period under our lease obligations, the amount of sublease
income we are able to realize on a particular property and estimates of other costs such as property taxes. Differences between actual future events and prior estimates could result in adjustments to these accrued costs. At December 31, 2004 we
had three non-operating restaurant properties.



34



---

##### Table of Contents

Insurance Liabilities. We are self-insured for most workers compensation, general liability
and medical insurance claims. At December 31, 2004, we had $9.4 million accrued for these insurance claims. We record insurance liabilities based on historical and industry trends, which are continually monitored, and adjust accruals as
warranted by changing circumstances. Since there are many estimates and assumptions involved in recording these insurance liabilities, including the ability to estimate the future development of incurred claims based on historical trends,
differences between actual future events and prior estimates and assumptions could result in adjustments to these liabilities.

Legal
Obligations.In the normal course of business, we must make estimates of potential future legal obligations and liabilities, which require the use of managements judgment. Management may also use outside legal advice to assist in the
estimating process. However, the ultimate outcome of various legal issues could be different than management estimates and adjustments to income could be required.

Income Taxes. We record income tax liabilities utilizing known obligations and estimates of potential obligations. We are required to record a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that the value of
estimated deferred tax assets are different from those recorded. This would include making estimates and judgments on future taxable income, the consideration of feasible tax planning strategies and existing facts and circumstances. When the amount
of deferred tax assets to be realized is expected to be different from that recorded, the asset balance and income statement would reflect the change in the period such determination is made.

Carrols and its subsidiaries file their tax returns on a consolidated basis with Carrols Holdings. Carrols Holdings has determined that it should have
requested permission from the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) in order for Carrols Holdings and its subsidiaries to file consolidated federal income tax returns for certain prior taxable years. Accordingly, Carrols Holdings has filed
a ruling request with the IRS requesting such permission. We expect that such request will be granted. Moreover, if such request is denied, we believe that Carrols could still properly have filed a consolidated return with the subsidiaries
comprising the Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical businesses, but this result is uncertain. If the IRS were to successfully challenge the inclusion of those subsidiaries in our consolidated tax return, we have estimated that we would owe back taxes in
an aggregate amount ranging from approximately $5 million to approximately $8 million plus interest (tax-effected) ranging from approximately $0.7 million to approximately $1.1 million. In such event, we would have net operating loss carryforwards,
for individual subsidiaries, that could be utilized to offset future taxable income of our group, and only any interest charged would negatively impact our earnings.

Evaluation of Goodwill. We must evaluate our recorded intangible assets for impairment under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, on
an ongoing basis. We have elected to conduct our annual impairment review of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets at December 31. Our review at December 31, 2004 indicated there has been no impairment as of that date. This
annual evaluation requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding the fair value of our reporting units. These estimates may differ from actual future events.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets. We assess the potential impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We determine if
there is impairment at the restaurant level by comparing undiscounted future cash flows from the related long-lived assets with their respective carrying values. In determining future cash flows, significant estimates are made by us with respect to
future operating results of each restaurant over its remaining lease term. If assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment charge is measured by calculating the amount by which the asset carrying amount exceeds its fair value. This process
requires the use of estimates and assumptions, which are subject to a high degree of judgment. If these assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets.

Impairment of Burger King Franchise Rights. We assess the potential impairment of Burger King franchise rights whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We determine if there is impairment by comparing the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows from those acquired restaurants with the respective carrying value of franchise
rights for each Burger King acquisition. In determining future cash flows, significant estimates are made by us with respect to future operating results of each group of acquired restaurants over their remaining franchise life. If acquired franchise
rights are determined to be impaired, the impairment charge is measured by calculating the amount by which the franchise rights carrying amount exceeds its fair value. This process requires the use of estimates and assumptions, which are subject to
a high degree of judgment. If these assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets.



35



---

##### Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for fiscal years 2002, 2003 and 2004, selected restated operating results of Carrols as a percentage of total restaurant sales:



|                                      |  |                         |   |  |               |   |  |               |  
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | - |  | ------------- | - |  | ------------- | -
|                                      |  | Year Ended December 31, |  
|                                      |  | Restated 2002           |   |  | Restated 2003 |   |  | Restated 2004 |  
|Restaurant sales:                     |  |                         |   |  |               |   |  |               |  
|Taco Cabana                           |  | 26.7                    | % |  | 28.1          | % |  | 29.1          | %
|Pollo Tropical                        |  | 15.3                    | % |  | 17.0          | % |  | 17.8          | %
|Burger King                           |  | 58.0                    | % |  | 54.9          | % |  | 53.1          | %
|                                      |  |                         |   |  |               |   |  |               |  
|Total restaurant sales                |  | 100.0                   | % |  | 100.0         | % |  | 100.0         | %
|Costs and expenses:                   |  |                         |   |  |               |   |  |               |  
|Cost of sales                         |  | 28.1                    | % |  | 28.2          | % |  | 29.1          | %
|Restaurant wages and related expenses |  | 29.9                    | % |  | 30.2          | % |  | 29.7          | %
|Restaurant rent expense               |  | 4.7                     | % |  | 4.8           | % |  | 5.0           | %
|Other restaurant operating expenses   |  | 13.3                    | % |  | 14.0          | % |  | 13.3          | %
|Advertising expense                   |  | 4.3                     | % |  | 4.2           | % |  | 3.5           | %
|General and administrative            |  | 5.6                     | % |  | 5.8           | % |  | 6.3           | %
|Income from restaurant operations     |  | 7.9                     | % |  | 5.9           | % |  | 7.3           | %

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003

In 2004, we opened five new Taco Cabana restaurants, three new Pollo Tropical restaurants and one new Burger King restaurant and closed four Burger King
restaurants. Fiscal 2004 included 53 weeks compared to 52 weeks in fiscal 2003.

On June 22, 2004, Carrols Holdings filed a
registration statement on Form S-1 for an offering of Enhanced Yield Securities and senior subordinated notes. On October 25, 2004, Carrols Holdings withdrew its registration statement on Form S-1 with respect to the aforementioned securities.
We recorded the incurred costs related to this offering of $2.3 million in other expense in the third quarter of 2004.

Restaurant
Sales. Total restaurant sales for 2004 increased by $52.7 million, or 8.2%, to $696.3 million from $643.6 million in 2003 due to sales increases at all three of our restaurant concepts. The extra week in fiscal 2004 resulted in an increase in
total consolidated sales of $13.0 million attributable to our three restaurant concepts as follows: Taco Cabana$3.8 million; Pollo Tropical - $2.3 million; and Burger King - $6.9 million.

Taco Cabana restaurant sales were $202.5 million in 2004, and excluding the extra week in 2004 increased $17.6 million, or 9.7%, due in part to a 4.8%
sales increase at our comparable Taco Cabana restaurants and the net addition of ten restaurants since the beginning of 2003. Such increase in Taco Cabanas comparable restaurant sales in 2004 resulted from higher customer traffic, an increase
in the average sales transaction compared to 2003 and, to a lesser extent, modest menu price increases of approximately 1% which occurred early in the first quarter of 2004.

Pollo Tropical restaurant sales were $124.0 million in 2004, and excluding the extra week in 2004 increased $12.5 million, or 11.4% due primarily to a
10.6% sales increase at our comparable Pollo Tropical restaurants that resulted from an increase in customer traffic, and to a much lesser extent the addition of five restaurants since the beginning of 2003. There were no significant menu price
increases affecting 2004 results of our Pollo Tropical restaurants.

Burger King restaurant sales were $369.8 million in 2004, and
excluding the extra week in 2004 increased $9.6 million, or 2.7% due primarily to an increase in comparable restaurant sales of 2.9% due to increases in the average sales transaction at our Burger King restaurants from sales of new premium
sandwiches introduced in 2004. These increases were partially offset by reduced customer traffic, most notably in the first quarter of 2004. Our Burger King restaurants had menu price increases of approximately 1.5% in August 2004.

Operating Costs and Expenses. Cost of sales (food and paper costs), as a percentage of total restaurant sales, increased to 29.1% in 2004 from
28.2% in 2003. Taco Cabana cost of sales, as a percentage of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, increased to 29.8% in 2004 from 29.6% in 2003 due to higher beef commodity prices in 2004, offset partially by a modest price increase of 1.0% early in the
first quarter of 2004 and improvements in restaurant food controls. Pollo Tropical cost of sales, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales, increased to 31.4% in 2004 from 30.5% in 2003 due to increases in chicken commodity costs (0.6% of
Pollo sales) and lower vendor rebates (0.6% of Pollo sales), partially offset by improvements in



36



---

##### Table of Contents

restaurant food controls. Burger King cost of sales, as a percentage of Burger King restaurant sales, increased significantly to 27.9% in 2004 from 26.7% in
2003 due to an increase in beef commodity prices of approximately 13% (0.6% of Burger King sales), increases in other commodity costs including cheese and produce, (0.9% of Burger King sales) and sales of new menu items which have higher selling
prices but lower margins as a percentage of their selling prices (0.4% of Burger King sales). These increases were offset in part by the effect of menu price increases (0.5% of Burger King sales) and lower promotional sales discounts (0.2% of Burger
King sales) in 2004.

Restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of total restaurant sales, decreased to 29.7% in 2004 from
30.2% in 2003. Taco Cabana restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, decreased to 28.5% in 2004 from 28.8% in 2003 due to the effect on fixed labor costs of higher comparable restaurant sales volumes and
to the price increase in the first quarter of 2004, offset in part by higher medical insurance costs (0.2% of Taco Cabana sales). Pollo Tropical restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales, decreased to
25.3% in 2004 from 25.7% in 2003 due to the effect on fixed labor costs of higher comparable restaurant sales volumes and restaurant productive labor efficiencies. Burger King restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of Burger King
restaurant sales, decreased to 31.8% in 2004 from 32.3% in 2003 due primarily to the effect on fixed labor costs of higher comparable restaurant sales volumes (0.4% of Burger King sales) and lower restaurant incentive bonuses (0.2% of Burger King
sales), offset in part by higher medical insurance costs (0.1% of Burger King sales).

Restaurant rent expense, as a percentage of total
restaurant sales, increased to 5.0% in 2004 from 4.8% in 2003 due to sale-leaseback transactions that were completed in 2003 and 2004.

Other restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of total restaurant sales, decreased to 13.3% in 2004 from 14.0% in 2003. Taco Cabana other restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, decreased to
13.2% in 2004 from 13.6% in 2003 due to the effect on fixed operating costs of higher comparable restaurant sales volumes and lower utility costs. Pollo Tropical other restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant
sales, decreased to 10.9% in 2004 from 11.8% in 2003 due to lower general liability insurance costs (0.4% of Pollo Tropical sales), lower utility costs (0.3% of Pollo Tropical sales) and the effect of higher comparable restaurant sales volumes on
fixed operating costs. Burger King other restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of Burger King restaurant sales, decreased to 14.3% in 2004 from 14.8% in 2003 due primarily to lower repair and maintenance expenses (0.2% of Burger King sales)
and lower discretionary restaurant operating expenses (0.3% of Burger King sales).

Advertising expense, as a percentage of total
restaurant sales, decreased to 3.5% in 2004 from 4.2% in 2003. Taco Cabana advertising expense, as a percentage of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, decreased to 4.1% in 2004 from 4.7% in 2003 due to the timing of promotions in 2004 compared to the
prior year. Our Taco Cabana advertising expenditures in 2005 (as a percentage of sales) are anticipated to be comparable to 2004. Pollo Tropical advertising expense, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales, decreased significantly to 1.6%
in 2004 from 3.6% in 2003 due to lower television and radio advertising expenditures. Our Pollo Tropical advertising expenditures in 2005 are anticipated to range from 2.0% to 2.5% of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales. Burger King advertising expense,
as a percentage of Burger King restaurant sales, decreased to 3.9% in 2004 from 4.2% in 2003 due to lower local advertising expenditures in 2004.

General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total restaurant sales, increased to 6.3% in 2004 from 5.8% in 2003. General and administrative expenses increased $6.2 million to $43.6 million due primarily to increased
administrative bonus levels in 2004 of $4.7 million and an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $1.6 million.

Segment
EBITDA. Segment EBITDA is a measure of segment profit or loss reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of allocating resources to our segments and assessing their performance. Segment EBITDA is defined as earnings before
interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, impairment losses, stock-based compensation expense, bonus to employees and director, other expense and loss on extinguishment of debt. Segment EBITDA for our Taco Cabana restaurant segment
increased to $30.1 million in 2004 from $24.2 million in 2003. Segment EBITDA for our Pollo Tropical restaurant segment increased to $27.9 million in 2004 from $22.5 million in 2003. Segment EBITDA for our Burger King restaurant segment decreased to
$36.6 million in 2004 from $37.4 million in 2003. Our fiscal year 2004 included 53 weeks. The effect of the additional week in 2004 increased segment EBITDA by $1.4 million for our Taco Cabana restaurants, $0.9 million for our Pollo Tropical
restaurants and $2.1 million for our Burger King restaurants.

Depreciation and Amortization and Impairment Losses. Depreciation and
amortization expense decreased to $38.5 million in 2004 from $40.2 million in 2003 due primarily to lower equipment depreciation at our Burger King restaurants. Impairment losses were $1.5 million in 2004 and were related to certain underperforming
Burger King restaurants. Impairment losses were $4.2 million in 2003; $3.5 million of which were related to certain underperforming Taco Cabana restaurants and $0.7 million of which were related to certain underperforming Burger King restaurants.



37



---

##### Table of Contents

Bonus to Employees and Director. In conjunction with our December 2004 refinancing, we approved a
compensatory bonus payment of approximately $20.3 million to a number of employees (including management) and a director who owned options to purchase common stock on a pro rata basis in proportion to the number of shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise of options owned by such persons. The bonus payment was made in January 2005 and including applicable payroll taxes totaled $20.9 million.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $2.0 million to $35.4 million in 2004 from $37.3 million in 2003 due primarily to lower average debt balances in 2004, offset slightly by higher effective interest
rates on our floating rate debt. The average effective interest rate on all debt, excluding lease financing obligations, increased to 7.8% in 2004 from 7.2% in 2003. This increase was primarily from our senior subordinated notes comprising a greater
percentage of our total outstanding debt, as a result of our principal prepayments on borrowings under our prior senior credit facility. Interest expense on lease financing obligations was $11.3 million in 2004 compared to $10.6 million in 2003.

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate for 2004 was 45.4%. This rate is higher than the Federal
statutory tax rate of 34% due primarily to state franchise taxes.

Net Income (Loss).As a result of the foregoing, we incurred a
net loss of $8.1 million in 2004 compared to net income of $1.3 million in 2003.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002

In 2003, we opened eight new Taco Cabana restaurants, two new Pollo Tropical restaurants and two new Burger King restaurants. We closed two Taco Cabana
restaurants and temporarily closed one Taco Cabana restaurant due to a fire. In addition, we also closed six Burger King restaurants, including one location where we sold the restaurant property.

Restaurant Sales. Total restaurant sales for 2003 decreased 1.8% to $643.6 million from $655.6 million in 2002.

Taco Cabana restaurant sales increased 3.5% to $181.1 million in 2003 from $175.0 million in 2002 due to the opening of 14 restaurants since the
beginning of 2002, which had incremental sales in 2003 of $12.1 million. These incremental sales were partially offset by a sales decrease at our comparable Taco Cabana restaurants of 3.0% in 2003 and the closure of three Taco Cabana restaurants in
2003.

Pollo Tropical restaurant sales increased $8.8 million to $109.2 million in 2003, or 8.7%, due to the opening of seven new
restaurants since the beginning of 2002, which had incremental sales in 2003 of $6.5 million, and a sales increase in 2003 of 2.3% at our comparable Pollo Tropical restaurants.

Burger King restaurant sales decreased 7.1% to $353.3 million in 2003 from $380.1 million in 2002 due to a sales decline at our comparable Burger King
restaurants of 7.2% for 2003. This decline in Burger King restaurant sales was due to unsuccessful system-wide marketing and new product initiatives in 2003.

Operating Costs and Expenses. Cost of sales (food and paper costs), as a percentage of total restaurant sales, increased slightly to 28.2% in 2003 from 28.1% in 2002. Taco Cabana cost of sales, as a percentage
of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, increased to 29.6% in 2003 from 29.3% in 2002 due to higher cheese commodity prices and lower gross margins on 2003 promotional menu items, partially offset by lower contractual beef commodity prices in 2003. Pollo
Tropical cost of sales, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales, decreased to 30.5% in 2003 from 30.7% in 2002 due to lower chicken commodity prices in 2003, higher vendor rebates (0.3% of Pollo Tropical sales) and improvements in
restaurant food cost controls, partially offset by lower gross margins on new menu items introduced since July 2002. Burger King cost of sales, as a percentage of Burger King restaurant sales, decreased slightly to 26.7% in 2003 from 26.8% in 2002
due to higher vendor rebates, improvements in restaurant food cost controls and the effects of modest menu price increases in the fourth quarter of 2002, partially offset by higher beef commodity prices in the fourth quarter of 2003.

Restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of total restaurant sales, increased to 30.2% in 2003 from 29.9% in 2002. Taco Cabana restaurant
wages and related expenses, as a percentage of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, decreased slightly to 29.0% in 2003 from 29.1% in 2002 due to restaurant labor efficiencies in 2003 and reductions in restaurant productive labor rates (together
representing 0.4% of Taco Cabana sales) substantially offset by the effect of lower comparable restaurant sales volumes on fixed labor costs. Pollo Tropical restaurant wages and related expenses, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales,
decreased to 25.7% in 2003 from 26.4% in 2002 due to restaurant productive labor efficiencies in the second half of 2003 (0.3% of Pollo Tropical sales) and lower workers compensation costs (0.3% of Pollo Tropical sales). Burger King restaurant wages
and related expenses, as a percentage of Burger King restaurant sales, increased to 32.3% in 2003 from 31.2% in 2002 due to the effect of lower restaurant sales volumes on fixed labor costs (0.9% of Burger King sales) and higher medical and workers
compensation costs (0.5% of Burger King sales) partially offset by restaurant productive labor efficiencies (0.4% of Burger King sales).



38



---

##### Table of Contents

Restaurant rent expense, as a percentage of total restaurant sales, increased slightly to 4.8% in 2003
from 4.7% in 2002 due to sale-leaseback transactions completed in 2003 and 2002.

Other restaurant operating expenses (which includes
advertising), as a percentage of total restaurant sales, increased to 18.2% in 2003 from 17.6% in 2002. Taco Cabana other restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of Taco Cabana restaurant sales, increased to 18.3% in 2003 from 16.7% in 2002
due primarily to higher utility costs from increases in natural gas prices (0.8% of Taco Cabana sales) and, to a lesser extent, higher advertising costs due primarily to additional promotions in 2003 (0.4% of Taco Cabana sales). Pollo Tropical other
restaurant operating expenses, as a percentage of Pollo Tropical restaurant sales, increased to 15.5% in 2003 from 14.7% in 2002 due primarily to higher utility costs (0.6% of Pollo Tropical sales). Burger King other restaurant operating expenses,
as a percentage of Burger King restaurant sales, increased to 19.1% in 2003 from 18.7% in 2002 due to higher utility costs (0.4% of Burger King sales) and the effect of lower comparable restaurant sales volumes on fixed costs (0.3% of Burger King
sales). These factors were partially offset by lower discretionary restaurant operating expenditures and local advertising costs (together representing 0.3% of Burger King sales).

General and administrative expenses increased $0.9 million to $37.4 million in 2003 from $36.5 million in 2002. As a percentage of total restaurant
sales, general and administrative expenses increased to 5.8% in 2003 from 5.6% in 2002.

Segment EBITDA. Segment EBITDA is a measure
of segment profit or loss reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of allocating resources to our segments and assessing their performance. Segment EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization, impairment losses, stock-based compensation expense, bonus to employees and director, other expense and loss on extinguishment of debt. Segment EBITDA for our Taco Cabana restaurants decreased $3.8 million to $24.2 million in 2003 from
$28.0 million in 2002. Segment EBITDA for our Pollo Tropical restaurants increased $0.5 million to $22.5 million in 2003 from $21.9 million in 2002. Segment EBITDA for our Burger King restaurants decreased $6.6 million to $37.4 million in 2003 from
$43.9 million in 2002.

Depreciation and Amortization and Impairment Losses. Depreciation and amortization increased $0.8 in 2003
from 2002 due primarily to our capital expenditures in 2003 and in the latter part of 2002. Impairment losses were $4.2 million in 2003; $3.5 million related to certain underperforming Taco Cabana restaurants and $0.7 million which were related to
certain underperforming Burger King restaurants. Impairment losses were $1.3 million in 2002; $0.3 million which were related to certain underperforming Taco Cabana restaurants and $1.0 million which were related to certain underperforming Burger
King restaurants.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $2.0 million to $37.3 million in 2003 from $39.3 million in 2002 due
primarily to lower average debt balances in 2003, resulting primarily from the use of the net proceeds from our sale-leaseback transactions in 2003 to reduce debt under the prior senior credit facility and, to a lesser extent, lower effective
interest rates on our floating rate debt. The average effective interest rate on all debt, excluding lease financing obligations, was 7.2% for 2003 compared to 7.3% in 2002. Interest expense on lease financing obligations was $10.6 million in 2003
compared to $10.2 million in 2002.

Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate for 2003 was 35.7%. This rate was higher than the
federal statutory tax rate of 34% due primarily to state franchise taxes and foreign taxes. Our effective income tax rate was higher in 2003 compared to our rate in 2002 of 35.3% due to the decrease in our pretax income to $2.1 million in 2003 from
$14.0 million in 2002.

Net Income.As a result of the foregoing, net income was $1.3 million in 2003 compared to $9.0 million in
2002.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We do not have significant receivables or inventory and receive trade credit based upon negotiated terms in purchasing food products and other supplies.
We are able to operate with a substantial working capital deficit because:



| |  |  | restaurant operations are primarily conducted on a cash basis;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | rapid turnover results in a limited investment in inventories; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | cash from sales is usually received before related accounts for food, supplies and payroll become due.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



39



---

##### Table of Contents

Historically, our cash requirements have arisen from:



| |  |  | servicing our debt;
| | - |  | -------------------



| |  |  | ongoing capital reinvestment in our existing restaurants; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | financing the opening and equipping of new restaurants.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------

Interest payments under our debt obligations represent significant liquidity requirements for us. We believe cash generated from our operations and availability under our revolving credit facility will provide sufficient cash availability
to cover our working capital needs, capital expenditures, planned development and debt service requirements for the next twelve months.

Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $59.2 million, $46.3 million and $54.2 million, respectively. Our income tax payments included in operating
activities have been reduced in each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 due to the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards. As of December 31, 2004, we had $1.6 million of remaining net operating loss carryforwards
for federal income tax purposes, federal alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $2.9 million and federal work opportunity tax credit carryforwards of $2.9 million.

Investing Activities Including Capital Expenditures and Sale-Leaseback Transactions. Net cash used for investing activities for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2002 was $8.5 million and $46.6 million, respectively. Net cash provided from investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $14.6 million. Capital expenditures represent a major investment of cash for
us, and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, were $19.1 million, $30.4 million and $54.2 million, respectively. We sold one non-operating property and an excess land parcel for total net proceeds of $1.2 million in 2004 and in
2003 we sold four non-operating properties for net proceeds of $2.7 million and a Burger King operating property for net proceeds of $1.2 million. The net proceeds from these sales were used to reduce outstanding debt under our senior credit
facility.

In 2004, we sold eight restaurant properties in sale-leaseback transactions for net proceeds of $11.0 million. In 2003, we sold
31 restaurant properties in sale-leaseback transactions for net proceeds of $44.2 million. In 2002, we sold eleven restaurant properties in sale-leaseback transactions for net proceeds of $8.4 million. The net proceeds from all such sales were used
to reduce outstanding debt under our senior credit facility. For 2005, we anticipate that our net proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions will range from $6.0 million to $10 million.

Our capital expenditures primarily include (1) capital restaurant maintenance expenditures, (2) restaurant remodeling and (3) new
restaurant development. Capital restaurant maintenance expenditures include capital expenditures for the ongoing reinvestment and enhancement of our restaurants. Remodeling expenditures include capital expenditures for renovating and in some cases
rebuilding the interior and exterior of our existing restaurants, which in the past have generally been expenditures associated with franchise renewals with respect to our Burger King restaurants. Capital expenditures for new restaurant development
are associated with developing new restaurants including the purchase of related real estate.

The following table sets forth our capital
expenditures for the periods presented:



|                                        |  |                        |        |               |   |            |  |              |        |  |   |       
|--------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | ------ | ------------- | - | ---------- |  | ------------ | ------ |  | - | ------
|                                        |  | TacoCabana             |        | PolloTropical |   | BurgerKing |  | Consolidated
|                                        |  | (Dollars in thousands)
|Year Ended December 31, 2004:           |  |                        |        |               |   |            |  |              |        |  |   |       
|Restaurant maintenance expenditures (1) |  | $                      | 2,496  |               | $ | 2,094      |  | $            | 2,913  |  | $ | 7,503 
|Restaurant remodeling expenditures      |  |                        |       |               |   |           |  |              | 845    |  |   | 845   
|New restaurant development expenditures |  |                        | 4,059  |               |   | 4,542      |  |              | 1,053  |  |   | 9,654 
|Other capital expenditures              |  |                        | 89     |               |   | 248        |  |              | 734    |  |   | 1,071 
|                                        |  |                        |        |               |   |            |  |              |        |  |   |       
|Total capital expenditures              |  | $                      | 6,644  |               | $ | 6,884      |  | $            | 5,545  |  | $ | 19,073
|                                        |  |                        |        |               |   |            |  |              |        |  |   |       
|Number of new restaurant openings       |  |                        | 5      |               |   | 3          |  |              | 1      |  |   | 9     
|                                        |  |                        |        |              
|Year Ended December 31, 2003:           |  |                        |        |               |   |            |  |              |        |  |   |       
|Restaurant maintenance expenditures (1) |  | $                      | 2,697  |               | $ | 2,186      |  | $            | 2,061  |  | $ | 6,944 
|Restaurant remodeling expenditures      |  |                        | 121    |               |   | 26         |  |              | 3,170  |  |   | 3,317 
|New restaurant development expenditures |  |                        | 13,687 |               |   | 2,147      |  |              | 2,872  |  |   | 18,706
|Other capital expenditures              |  |                        | 322    |               |   | 232        |  |              | 850    |  |   | 1,404 
|                                        |  |                        |        |               |   |            |  |              |        |  |   |       
|Total capital expenditures              |  | $                      | 16,827 |               | $ | 4,591      |  | $            | 8,953  |  | $ | 30,371
|                                        |  |                        |        |               |   |            |  |              |        |  |   |       
|Number of new restaurant openings       |  |                        | 8      |               |   | 2          |  |              | 2      |  |   | 12    
|                                        |  |                        |        |              
|Year Ended December 31, 2002:           |  |                        |        |               |   |            |  |              |        |  |   |       
|Restaurant maintenance expenditures (1) |  | $                      | 2,144  |               | $ | 1,955      |  | $            | 4,919  |  | $ | 9,018 
|Restaurant remodeling expenditures      |  |                        | 3,555  |               |   |           |  |              | 12,699 |  |   | 16,254
|New restaurant development expenditures |  |                        | 11,050 |               |   | 7,302      |  |              | 9,113  |  |   | 27,465
|Other capital expenditures              |  |                        | 426    |               |   | 341        |  |              | 651    |  |   | 1,418 
|                                        |  |                        |        |               |   |            |  |              |        |  |   |       
|Total capital expenditures              |  | $                      | 17,175 |               | $ | 9,598      |  | $            | 27,382 |  | $ | 54,155
|                                        |  |                        |        |               |   |            |  |              |        |  |   |       
|Number of new restaurant openings       |  |                        | 6      |               |   | 5          |  |              | 10     |  |   | 21    

---

|(1) | Excludes restaurant repair and maintenance expenses included in other restaurant operating expenses in our consolidated financial statements. For the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, these restaurant repair and maintenance expenses were approximately $15.7 million, $15.3 million and $15.9 million, respectively.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



40



---

##### Table of Contents

In 2005, we anticipate that total capital expenditures will be approximately $30 million to $35 million.
These capital expenditures include approximately $14 million to $17 million for the development of new restaurants and purchase of related real estate applicable to our Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical restaurant concepts. In 2005 we anticipate
opening approximately three to five new Pollo Tropical restaurants (of which two have opened to date) and seven to nine new Taco Cabana restaurants (of which three have opened to date). Capital expenditures in 2005 also include expenditures of
approximately $14 million to $16 million for the ongoing reinvestment in our three restaurant concepts for remodeling costs and capital maintenance expenditures and approximately $2.0 million in other capital expenditures.

Financing Activities including December 2004 Refinancing. On December 15, 2004, we completed the private placement of $180.0 million of our
notes. Concurrently, we repaid all outstanding borrowings under our prior senior secured credit facility and amended and restated such senior credit facility with a new syndicate of lenders. We received $400.0 million in total proceeds that included
the issuance of the notes and term loan B borrowings of $220.0 million under the new senior credit facility. The proceeds were primarily utilized to repay borrowings outstanding under the prior senior credit facility of $74.4 million, to retire all
of our 91/2% senior subordinated notes due 2008 (including redemption premiums) in the amount of $175.9 million,
to pay a dividend to Holdings, our sole stockholder, in the amount of $116.8 million (and Holdings concurrently paid a dividend to its stockholders in the aggregate amount of $116.8 million), to pay fees and expenses related to the refinancing of
$8.8 million, and to pay a bonus to employees (including management) and a director, who owned options to purchase common stock of Holdings, totaling $20.9 million including $0.6 million of payroll taxes. We also recorded an $8.9 million loss on
early extinguishment of debt primarily from the write-off of previously deferred financing costs and premiums in conjunction with the retirement of the 91/2% senior subordinated notes.

Net cash used for financing activities for the
year ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $21.7 million, $61.1 million and $7.4 million, respectively. Financing activities in these periods consisted primarily of borrowings and repayments under our debt arrangements and proceeds from
the sales of restaurants in sale-leaseback transactions accounted for as lease financing obligations of $4.5 million, $3.6 million and $5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Indebtedness. The prior senior credit facility consisted of a $50.0 million revolving credit facility (including a standby letter of credit
facility for up to $20.0 million), a $70.0 million term loan A facility and an $80.0 million term loan B facility. In connection with the December 2004 refinancing, all amounts outstanding under the prior senior credit facility were repaid in full
and we amended and restated the prior senior credit facility.

New Senior Credit Facility. Concurrently with the consummation of the
December 2004 refinancing, we repaid all outstanding borrowings due under our prior senior credit facility and amended and restated that credit facility with a new syndicate of lenders. The new senior credit facility consists of a $50.0 million
revolving credit facility (including a sublimit of up to $20.0 million for letters of credit and up to $5.0 million for swingline loans), a $220.0 million term loan B facility and Incremental Facilities (as defined in the new senior credit
facility), at our option, of up to $100.0 million, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. At December 31, 2004, we had no borrowings outstanding on the revolving credit facility and $220 million of borrowings outstanding on the term
loan B facility and $39.1 million was available for borrowings under the revolving credit facility after reserving $10.9 million for letters of credit guaranteed by the facility.

The Incremental Facilities will be effected as term loan facilities that will mature and amortize in a manner reasonably acceptable to the Agent (as
defined in the new senior credit facility), but will not in any event have a shorter average life than the term loan B facility. The Incremental Facilities (i) will rank pari passu in right of payment and security with the revolving credit
facility and the term loan B facility and (ii) except as set forth above, will be treated substantially the same as (and in



41



---

##### Table of Contents

any event no more favorably than) the term loan B facility (including with respect to mandatory and voluntary prepayments and collateral and guarantee
position); provided that the Incremental Facilities may provide for material additional or different financial or other covenants applicable only during periods after the final maturity of the term loan B facility. Borrowings under the Incremental
Facilities will bear interest at a rate per annum that will not exceed the interest rate per annum on term loan B facility borrowings by more than 0.25% unless the interest rate on term loan B borrowings is concurrently increased to be no less than
0.25% less than the interest rate on borrowings under the Incremental Facilities. In order to request the Incremental Facilities, we must not be in default under the new senior credit facility, must be in pro forma compliance with certain financial
covenants and the proposed new borrowing must not require us to secure any other indebtedness with the new senior credit facility collateral.

The revolving credit facility will expire on December 31, 2009. The outstanding principal amount of term loan B facility borrowings will be repayable as follows: (i) an aggregate of $2.2 million per annum payable in four equal
quarterly installments for each of the first five years and (ii) in the sixth year, an aggregate of $209.0 million, payable in four equal quarterly installments with the final quarterly payment payable upon the term loan B facilitys
maturity on December 31, 2010.

Borrowings under the revolving credit facility will bear an interest rate per annum, at our option,
equal to (i) the sum of (a) the higher of (1) the rate of interest publicly announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as its prime rate in effect at its principal office in New York City and (2) the federal funds effective rate from
time to time plus 0.5% plus (b) a margin of 0.50%, 0.75%, 1.0%, 1.25% or 1.50% based on us achieving certain total leverage ratios (as defined in the new senior credit facility) or (ii) LIBOR (as defined in the new senior credit facility)
plus 2.00%, 2.25%, 2.50%, 2.75% or 3.00% based on us achieving certain total leverage ratios (as defined in the new senior credit facility).

Borrowings under the term loan B facility will bear interest at a per annum rate, at our option, of either (a) the sum of (i) the greater of (A) the rate of interest publicly announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as its
prime rate in effect at its principal office in New York City and (B) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.5%, plus (ii) 0.75% or 1.00% based on us achieving certain total leverage ratios or (b) LIBOR (as defined
in the new senior credit facility) plus 2.25% or 2.50% based us achieving certain total leverage ratios.

Our obligations under the new
senior credit facility are guaranteed by Carrols Holdings and all our material subsidiaries and are secured by a first priority lien and security interest on all of our and the guarantor subsidiaries assets, tangible or intangible, real,
personal or mixed, existing and newly acquired. In addition, all obligations under the new senior credit facility and the guarantees are secured by our and such subsidiaries pledge of all the outstanding capital stock of our subsidiaries.
Under the new senior credit facility, we are required to make mandatory prepayments of principal on term loan B facility borrowings (a) annually in an initial amount equal to 50% of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the new senior credit
facility), (b) in the event of certain dispositions of assets (all subject to certain exceptions) and insurance proceeds, in an amount equal to 100% of the net proceeds received by us therefrom, and (c) in an amount equal to 100% of the
net proceeds from any subsequent issuance of debt.

The new senior credit facility contains certain covenants, including, without
limitation, those limiting our and our subsidiaries ability to incur indebtedness, incur liens, sell or acquire assets or businesses, change the nature of its business, engage in transactions with related parties, make certain investments or
pay dividends. In addition, the new senior credit facility requires us to meet certain financial ratio tests. At December 31, 2004, we were in compliance with the covenants in its senior credit facility.

As a result of the original restatement of our financial statements as discussed in Note 2, we were in default under our new senior credit facility by
failing to timely furnish our annual audited financial statements for fiscal year 2004 to our lenders. On May 19, 2005, we obtained a waiver of such default from our lenders that extended the time period to deliver the audited financial
statements for the 2004 fiscal year as well as the financial statements for the first quarter of 2005 to July 31, 2005. While we currently anticipate delivering our first quarter financial statements by July 31, 2005, our failure to
deliver the financial statements for the first quarter of 2005 by July 31, 2005 would constitute an event of default under the new senior credit facility. If such an event of default occurs under our new senior credit facility that is not
waived, the lenders could cause all amounts outstanding with respect to the borrowings to be due and payable immediately which in turn would result in cross-defaults under the Indenture governing the notes. Our assets and cash flow may not be
sufficient to fully repay outstanding debt if accelerated upon an event of default.

Senior Subordinated Notes. On December 15,
2004, we issued $180.0 million of notes. The notes are unsecured and bear interest at a rate of 9% payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 (commencing July 15, 2005) and mature on January 15, 2013. The notes are
redeemable at the option of the Company in whole or in part on or after January 15, 2009 at a price of 104.5% of the principal amount if redeemed before January 15, 2010, 102.25% of the principal amount if redeemed after January 15,
2010 but before January 15, 2011 and at 100% of the principal amount after January 15, 2011.



42



---

##### Table of Contents

Restrictive covenants under the notes include limitations with respect to the Companys ability to
issue additional debt, incur liens, sell or acquire assets or businesses, pay dividends and make certain investments. We were in compliance at December 31, 2004 with the restrictive covenants with the Indenture, dated as of December 15,
2004, by and between us, as issuer, the guarantors, as the guarantors, and the Bank of New York, as trustee, which we refer to as the Indenture governing the notes.

In connection with sale of $180 million of the notes, we and certain of our subsidiaries, which we refer to as the guarantors, entered into a
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 15, 2004, with J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Lehman Brothers Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc. In general, the Registration
Rights Agreement provided that we and the guarantors agreed to file, and cause to become effective, a registration statement with the SEC in which we offer the holders of the notes the opportunity to exchange such notes for newly issued notes that
have terms which are identical to the notes due that are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to as the exchange offer.

Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, because we did not complete the exchange offer on or prior to June 13, 2005, the interest rate on our notes was increased by 0.25% per annum for the 90-day
period immediately following June 13, 2005 and will be increased by an additional 0.25% per annum for each subsequent 90-day period, with a maximum of 1.00% per annum of additional interest, in each case until the exchange offer is
completed or the notes become freely tradable under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.



43



---

##### Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations. The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and
commitments as of December 31, 2004 (in thousands):



|                                                    |  |                        |           |                  |   |             |  |             |         |                   |   |         |  |   |        
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | --------- | ---------------- | - | ----------- |  | ----------- | ------- | ----------------- | - | ------- |  | - | -------
|                                                    |  | Payments due by period
|Contractual Obligations                             |  | Total                  |           | Less than 1 Year |   | 1  3 Years |  | 3  5 Years |         | More than 5 Years
|Long-term debt obligations, including interest (1)  |  | $                      | 592,949   |                  | $ | 21,919      |  | $           | 59,467  |                   | $ | 59,005  |  | $ | 452,558
|Capital lease obligations, including interest (2)   |  |                        | 1,505     |                  |   | 534         |  |             | 727     |                   |   | 193     |  |   | 51     
|Operating lease obligations                         |  |                        | 306,658   |                  |   | 33,573      |  |             | 59,272  |                   |   | 46,647  |  |   | 167,166
|Lease financing obligations, including interest (3) |  |                        | 268,759   |                  |   | 10,729      |  |             | 21,777  |                   |   | 22,757  |  |   | 213,496
|                                                    |  |                        |           |                  |   |             |  |             |         |                   |   |         |  |   |        
|Total contractual obligations                       |  | $                      | 1,169,871 |                  | $ | 66,755      |  | $           | 141,243 |                   | $ | 128,602 |  | $ | 833,271
|                                                    |  |                        |           |                  |   |             |  |             |         |                   |   |         |  |   |        

---

|(1) | Our long-term debt obligations include $180 million of notes and $220 million of borrowings outstanding under the term loan B facility of our new senior credit facility. Interest
payments on our notes of $129,713 for all years presented are included at the coupon rate of 9%. Interest payments included above totaling $63,236 for all years presented on our term loan B facility are variable in nature and have been calculated
using an interest rate of 5.25% for each year (See Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RisksInterest Rate Risk).
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Includes interest of $280 in total for all years presented.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Includes interest of $157,044 in total for all years presented.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

We have not included obligations under our postretirement medical benefit plans in the contractual obligations table as our postretirement plan is not required to be funded in advance, but is funded as retiree medical claims are paid. Also
excluded from the contractual obligations table are payments we may make for workers compensation, general liability and employee healthcare claims for which we are self-insured. The majority of our recorded liabilities related to self-insured
employee health and insurance plans represent estimated reserves for incurred claims that have yet to be filed or settled.

Long-Term
Debt Obligations. Refer to Note 7 of the consolidated financial statements for details of our long-term debt.

Capital Lease and
Operating Lease Obligations. Refer to Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements for details of our capital lease and operating lease obligations.

Lease Financing Obligations. Refer to Note 8 of the consolidated financial statements for details of our lease financing obligations.

Inflation

The inflationary factors that have historically affected our results of operations include
increases in food and paper costs, labor and other operating expenses. Wages paid in our restaurants are impacted by changes in the Federal and state hourly minimum wage rates. Accordingly, changes in the Federal and state hourly minimum wage rates
directly affect our labor costs. The restaurant industry and we typically attempt to offset the effect of inflation, at least in part, through periodic menu price increases and various cost reduction programs. However, no assurance can be given that
we will be able to offset such inflationary cost increases in the future.

Recent Accounting Developments

In September 2004, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Topic D-108, Use of the Residual Method to Value Acquired Assets
Other than Goodwill, which requires companies, that have applied the residual method to value intangible assets, to perform an impairment test on those intangible assets by the end of the first quarter of 2005. We do not expect the provisions
of EITF Topic D-108 to materially effect our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) which replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. SFAS 123R requires the measurement of all employee share-based payments, including grants of employee stock options, using a fair-value-based method and the recording of such expense in the consolidated statements of operations. The
pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 no longer will be an alternative to financial statement recognition. In March 2005 the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 Share-Based Payment, SAB
No. 107 expresses views of the SEC staff regarding the interaction between SFAS 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides the staffs views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements. SFAS 123R is effective
for awards that are granted, modified, or settled in cash for the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005. We are currently evaluating the impact of these pronouncements on our financial statements.



44



---

##### Table of Contents

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets
(SFAS 153). This Statement amends the guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions (APB 29). APB 29 provided an exception to the basic measurement principle (fair value) for
exchanges of similar assets, requiring that some nonmonetary exchanges be recorded on a carryover basis. SFAS 153 eliminates the exception to fair value for exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchange
transactions that do not have commercial substance, that is, transactions that are not expected to result in significant changes in the cash flows of the reporting entity. The provisions of SFAS 153 are effective for exchanges of nonmonetary assets
occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 153 on its financial statements.

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that the term conditional as used in SFAS No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity even if the timing and/or settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of
an entity. Accordingly, the entity must record a liability for the conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 is effective for periods no later than fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2005. We are currently evaluating the impact of FIN 47 on our financial statements.

On June 30, 2005, tax
legislation in the state of Ohio was enacted that will significantly restructure the tax system for most corporate taxpayers. Included in the legislation is a multi-year phase-out of the state franchise tax and tangible personal property tax. These
taxes will be replaced with a Commercial Activity Tax that will be phased-in over a five-year period. We are evaluating the impact of this legislation and will record any impact therefrom in the second quarter of 2005.

Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the
risks described below, as well as other information and data included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our business, consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Intense competition in the restaurant industry could make it more difficult to expand our business and could also have a negative impact on our
operating results if customers favor our competitors or we are forced to change our pricing and other marketing strategies.

The
restaurant industry is highly competitive. In each of our markets, our restaurants compete with a large number of national and regional restaurant chains, as well as locally owned restaurants, offering low and medium-priced fare. We also compete
with convenience stores, delicatessens and prepared food counters in grocery stores, supermarkets, cafeterias and other purveyors of moderately priced and quickly prepared food.

Pollo Tropicals competitors include national and regional chicken-based concepts, such as Boston Market and Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC), and
regional grilled chicken concepts as well as quick-service hamburger restaurant chains and other types of quick-casual restaurants. Our Taco Cabana restaurants, although part of the quick-casual segment of the restaurant industry, compete with
quick-service restaurants, including those in the quick-service Mexican segment such as Taco Bell, other quick-casual restaurants and traditional casual dining Mexican restaurants.

With respect to our Burger King restaurants, our largest competitors are McDonalds and Wendys restaurants. According to Technomic,
McDonalds restaurants had aggregate U.S. system-wide sales of $24.4 billion in 2004 and operated 13,673 restaurants in the United States in 2004, and Wendys restaurants had aggregate system wide sales of $7.7 billion in 2004 and operated
5,935 restaurants in the United States in 2004.

To remain competitive, we, as well as certain of the other major quick-casual and
quick-service restaurant chains, have increasingly offered selected food items and combination meals at discounted prices. These changes in pricing and other marketing strategies have had, and in the future may continue to have, a negative impact on
our sales and earnings.



45



---

##### Table of Contents

Factors specific to the quick-casual and quick-service restaurant segments may adversely affect our consolidated
results of operations, which may cause a decrease in earnings and revenues.

The quick-casual and quick-service restaurant segments are
highly competitive and can be materially adversely affected by many factors, including:



| |  |  | changes in local, regional or national economic conditions;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in demographic trends;
| | - |  | ------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in consumer tastes;
| | - |  | ---------------------------



| |  |  | changes in traffic patterns;
| | - |  | ----------------------------



| |  |  | increases in fuel prices, including a continuation of the current relatively higher levels of gasoline prices;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | consumer concerns about health and nutrition;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------



| |  |  | increases in the number of, and particular locations of, competing restaurants;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | inflation;
| | - |  | ----------



| |  |  | increases in utility costs;
| | - |  | ---------------------------



| |  |  | increases in the cost of food, such as beef and chicken, and packaging;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | consumer dietary considerations;
| | - |  | --------------------------------



| |  |  | increased labor costs, including healthcare and minimum wage requirements;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | regional weather conditions; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------



| |  |  | the availability of experienced management and hourly-paid employees.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

We are highly dependent on the Burger King system and our ability to renew our franchise agreements with Burger King Corporation. The failure to renew our franchise agreements or Burger Kings failure to compete effectively could
materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations.

For the year ended December 31, 2004, our Burger King
restaurants contributed approximately 53% of our total revenues. Due to the nature of franchising and our agreements with BKC, our success is, to a large extent, directly related to the success of the nationwide Burger King system. In turn, the
ability of the nationwide Burger King system to compete effectively depends upon the success of the management of the Burger King system and the success of its advertising programs and new products. We cannot assure you that Burger King will be able
to compete effectively with other quick-service restaurants. As a result, any failure of Burger King to compete effectively would likely have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Each of our Burger King restaurants operates under a separate franchise agreement with BKC. Under our franchise agreements with BKC, we are required to
comply with operational programs established by BKC. For example, our franchise agreements with BKC require that our restaurants comply with specified design criteria. In addition, BKC generally has the right to require us during the tenth year of a
franchise agreement to remodel our restaurants to conform to the then-current image of Burger King, which may require the expenditure of considerable funds. In addition, although not required by the franchise agreements, we may not be able to avoid
adopting menu price discount promotions instituted by BKC that may be unprofitable.

BKCs consent is required for us to open new
Burger King restaurants and acquire existing Burger King restaurants from other franchisees. BKC has a right of first refusal to acquire existing Burger King restaurants that we may seek to acquire from other franchisees. We cannot assure you that
BKC will continue to consent to our development of new Burger King restaurants or our acquisitions of existing Burger King restaurants in the future or that it would not exercise its right of first refusal with regard to Burger King restaurants we
seek to acquire. To date, BKC has approved all of our acquisitions of Burger King restaurants from other franchisees; however, in two instances, BKC exercised its right of first refusal and purchased restaurants we sought to acquire.



46



---

##### Table of Contents

Our franchise agreements typically have a 20-year term after which BKCs consent is required to
receive a successor franchise agreement. As of December 31, 2004, we operated 348 Burger King restaurants. Our franchise agreements with BKC that are set to expire over the next three years are as follows:



| |  |  | 10 of our franchise agreements with BKC are due to expire in the last two quarters of 2005;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 18 of our franchise agreements with BKC are due to expire in 2006; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 17 of our franchise agreements with BKC are due to expire in 2007.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------

Although historically, BKC has granted all of our requests for successor franchise agreements, we cannot assure you that BKC will grant each of our requests for successor franchise agreements, and any failure of BKC
to renew our franchise agreements could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, as a condition of approval of a successor franchise agreement, BKC may require us to make capital improvements to particular restaurants to bring them up to
Burger King current design standards, which may require us to incur substantial costs.

In addition, our franchise agreements with BKC do
not give us exclusive rights to operate Burger King restaurants in any defined territory. Although we believe that BKC generally seeks to ensure that newly granted franchises do not materially adversely affect the operations of existing Burger King
restaurants, we cannot assure you that franchises granted by BKC to third parties will not adversely affect any Burger King restaurants that we operate.

Our continued growth depends on our ability to open and operate new restaurants profitably, which in turn depends on our continued access to capital, and newly acquired or developed restaurants may not perform as we expect and we cannot
assure you that our growth and development plans will be achieved.

Our continued growth depends on our ability to develop additional
Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants and to selectively acquire and develop additional Burger King restaurants. Development involves substantial risks, including the following:



| |  |  | the inability to fund development;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | development costs that exceed budgeted amounts;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | delays in completion of construction;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | the inability to obtain all necessary zoning and construction permits;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the inability to identify, or the unavailability of, suitable sites on acceptable leasing or purchase terms;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | developed restaurants that do not achieve desired revenue or cash flow levels once opened;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | incurring substantial unrecoverable costs in the event a development project is abandoned prior to completion;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the inability to recruit, train and retain managers and other employees necessary to staff each new restaurant;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in governmental rules, regulations and interpretations; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in general economic and business conditions.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------

We
cannot assure you that our growth and development plans can be achieved. Our development plans will require additional management, operational and financial resources. For example, we will be required to recruit and train managers and other
personnel for each new restaurant. We cannot assure you that we will be able to manage our expanding operations effectively and our failure to do so could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, our ability to open new restaurants
and to grow, as well as our ability to meet other anticipated capital needs, will depend on our continued access to external financing, including borrowings under our new senior credit facility. We cannot assure you that we will have access to the
capital we need on acceptable terms or at all, which could materially adversely affect our business.

Additionally, we may encounter
difficulties growing beyond our presence in our existing core markets. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully grow our market presence beyond the current key regions within our existing markets, as we may encounter
well-established competitors in new areas. In addition, we may be unable to find attractive locations or successfully market our products as we attempt to expand beyond our existing core markets, as the competitive circumstances and consumer
characteristics in these new areas may differ substantially from those in areas in which we currently operate. As a result of the foregoing, we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully integrate or profitably operate our new
restaurants outside our core markets.



47



---

##### Table of Contents

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our consolidated financial condition and our ability to operate
our business.

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2004, we had $512.9 million of outstanding
indebtedness, including $220 million of indebtedness under our new senior credit facility (excluding $10.9 million of outstanding letters of credit and $39.1 million of unused availability under our new senior credit facility), $180 million of
notes, $111.7 million of lease financing obligations and $1.2 million of capital leases and other debt. As a result, we are a highly leveraged company. This level of indebtedness could have important consequences, including the following:



| |  |  | it will limit our ability to borrow money to fund our working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and debt service requirements and other financing needs;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our interest expense would increase if interest rates in general increase because a substantial portion of our indebtedness, including all of our indebtedness under the new senior
credit facility, bears interest at floating rates;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | it may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and future business opportunities;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | we are more highly leveraged than some of our competitors, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | it may make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our business, industry or the economy in general;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations will be dedicated to the repayment of our indebtedness and related interest, including indebtedness we may incur in the
future, and will not be available for other purposes; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | there would be a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition if we were unable to service our indebtedness or obtain additional financing as needed.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may still incur significantly more debt, which could further exacerbate the risks described
above.

Although covenants under the new senior credit facility and the Indenture governing the notes limit our ability and the ability
of our present and future restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, the terms of the new senior credit facility and the Indenture governing the notes permit us to incur significant additional indebtedness, including unused
availability under our revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2005, we had $39.2 million available for additional borrowing under our revolving credit facility (after reserving for $10.8 million of letters of credit outstanding), subject to
compliance with customary borrowing conditions. Also under the terms of the new senior credit facility, we may borrow an additional $100.0 million, subject to certain conditions. In addition, neither the new senior credit facility nor the Indenture
governing the notes prevent us from incurring obligations that do not constitute indebtedness as defined in those documents. To the extent that we incur additional indebtedness or other obligations, the risks associated with our substantial leverage
described above, including our possible inability to service our debt, would increase.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to meet our
debt service obligations.

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures
will depend on our ability to generate cash from our future operations and on our continued access to external sources of financing. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other
factors that are beyond our control.

Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations and future borrowings under the
new senior credit facility or from other sources may not be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to repay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs, including capital expenditure requirements. If we complete an
acquisition, our debt service requirements could increase. A substantial portion of our indebtedness, including all of our indebtedness under the new senior credit facility, bears interest at floating rates, and therefore if interest rates increase,
our debt service requirements will increase. We may need to refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. We may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including the new senior credit facility and
the notes, on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we cannot service or refinance our indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as selling assets, seeking additional equity or reducing or delaying capital expenditures, strategic
acquisitions, investments and alliances, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Additionally, we may not be able to effect such actions, if necessary, on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.



48



---

##### Table of Contents

In addition, upon the incurrence of specific kinds of change of control events, we must offer to purchase
the notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the purchase date. We may not have sufficient funds available to make any required repurchases of the notes, and restrictions under our new senior credit facility
may not allow that repurchase. If we fail to repurchase the notes in that circumstance, we will be in default under the Indenture governing the notes and, under cross-default clauses, we will also be in default under the new senior credit facility.
In addition, certain change of control events will constitute an event of default under the new senior credit facility. A default under the new senior credit facility could result in an event of default under the Indenture if the administrative
agent or the lenders accelerate the debt under the new senior credit facility. In the event of a default under our new senior credit facility or the Indenture, the holders of the applicable indebtedness generally would be able to declare all of that
indebtedness to be due and payable as described in the following risk factor. Upon the occurrence of a change of control we could seek to refinance the indebtedness under the new senior credit facility and the notes or obtain a waiver from the
lenders or the noteholders. We cannot assure you, however, that we would be able to obtain a waiver or refinance our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, in which case we might be required to sell assets to satisfy our repayment
obligations. Any future debt that we incur may also contain restrictions on repayment of the notes or borrowings under our new senior credit facility upon a change of control.

Restrictive covenants in the new senior credit facility and the Indenture governing the notes may restrict our ability to operate our business and to pursue our business strategies; and defaults under our debt
instruments may allow the lenders to declare borrowings due and payable.

The new senior credit facility and the Indenture governing the
notes limit our ability, among other things, to:



| |  |  | incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | pay dividends or make distributions in respect of our capital stock or make certain other restricted payments or investments;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | sell assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | agree to limitations on our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to make distributions;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | enter into transactions with our subsidiaries and affiliates;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | incur liens;
| | - |  | ------------



| |  |  | enter into new lines of business; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | engage in consolidations, mergers or sales of substantially all of our assets.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition, the new senior credit facility restricts our ability to prepay our other indebtedness while borrowings under the new senior credit facility remain outstanding. The new senior credit facility also requires
us to maintain compliance with specified financial ratios. Our ability to comply with these ratios may be affected by events beyond our control.

The restrictions contained in the Indenture governing the notes and the new senior credit facility could:



| |  |  | limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions or meet capital needs or otherwise restrict our activities or business plans; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | adversely affect our ability to finance our operations, strategic acquisitions, investments or alliances or other capital needs or to engage in other business activities that would
be in our interest.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As noted above, our ability to remain in compliance with agreements and covenants in our debt
instruments depends upon our results of operations and may be affected by events beyond our control, including economic, financial and industry conditions. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will remain in compliance with those
agreements and covenants. As a result of the original restatement of our financial statements as discussed in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, we were in default under our new senior credit facility by failing to timely furnish our
annual audited financial statements for fiscal year 2004 to our lenders. On May 19, 2005, we obtained a waiver of such default from our lenders that extended the time period to deliver the audited financial statements for the 2004 fiscal year
as well as the financial statements for the first quarter of 2005 to July 31, 2005. Accordingly there can be no assurance that we will remain in compliance with agreements and covenants in our debt instruments. In the event of a default under
our new senior credit facility or the



49



---

##### Table of Contents

Indenture, the holders of the applicable indebtedness generally would be able to declare all of that indebtedness, together with accrued interest, to be due
and payable. In addition, borrowings under the new senior credit facility are secured by a first priority lien on all of our assets and, in the event of a default under that facility, the lenders generally would be entitled to seize the collateral.
In addition, default under one debt instrument could in turn permit lenders under other debt instruments to declare borrowings outstanding under those other instruments to be due and payable pursuant to cross default clauses. Moreover, upon the
occurrence of an event of default under the new senior credit facility, the commitment of the lenders to make any further loans to us would be terminated. Accordingly, the occurrence of a default under any debt instrument, unless cured or waived,
would likely have a material adverse effect on our business.

We can be adversely affected by widespread negative publicity regarding food quality,
illness, injury or other health concerns.

Negative publicity about food quality, illness, injury or other health concerns (including
health implications of obesity and transfatty acids) or similar issues stemming from one restaurant or a number of restaurants could materially adversely affect us, regardless of whether they pertain to our own restaurants. For example, health
concerns about the consumption of beef or chicken or by specific events such as the outbreak of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (mad cow disease) or Avian Influenza (bird flu) could lead to changes in consumer preferences, reduce consumption of our
products and adversely affect our financial performance. These events could reduce the available supply of beef or chicken or significantly raise the price of beef or chicken.

In addition, we cannot guarantee that our operational controls and employee training will be effective in preventing food-borne illnesses and other food
safety issues that may affect our restaurants. Food-borne illness incidents could be caused by food suppliers and transporters and, therefore, would be outside of our control. Any publicity relating to health concerns or the perceived or specific
outbreaks of food-borne illnesses or other food safety issues attributed to one or more of our restaurants, could result in a significant decrease in guest traffic in all of our restaurants and could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations. In addition, similar publicity or occurrences with respect to other restaurants or restaurant chains could also decrease our guest traffic and have a similar material adverse effect on us.

We may incur significant liability or reputational harm if claims are brought against us or against our franchisees.

We or our franchisees may be subject to complaints, regulatory proceedings or litigation from guests or other persons alleging food-related illness,
injuries suffered in our premises or other food quality, health or operational concerns, including environmental claims. In addition, in recent years a number of restaurant companies have been subject to lawsuits, including class action lawsuits,
alleging, among other things, violations of federal and state law regarding workplace and employment matters, discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination and wage, rest break, meal break and overtime compensation issues and, in the case of
quick service restaurants, alleging that they have failed to disclose the health risks associated with high-fat foods and that their marketing practices have encouraged obesity. We may also be subject to litigation or other actions initiated by
governmental authorities, our employees and our franchisees, among others, based upon these and other matters. A significant judgment against us could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance or liquidity. Adverse publicity
resulting from such allegations or occurrences or alleged discrimination or other operating issues stemming from one of our locations, a number of our locations or our franchisees could adversely affect our business, regardless of whether the
allegations are true, or whether we are ultimately held liable. Future cases which may be filed against us could materially adversely affect us if we lose such cases and have to pay substantial damages or if we settle such cases. In addition, any
future cases may materially and adversely affect our operations by increasing our litigation costs and diverting our attention and resources to address such actions. In addition, if a claim is successful, our insurance coverage may not be adequate
to cover all liabilities or losses and we may not be able to continue to maintain such insurance, or to obtain comparable insurance at a reasonable cost, if at all. If we suffer losses, liabilities or loss of income in excess of our insurance
coverage or if our insurance does not cover such loss, liability or loss of income, there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations. See Legal Proceedings.

Our expansion into new markets may present increased risks due to our unfamiliarity with the area.

Some of our new restaurants will be located in areas where we have little or no meaningful experience. Those markets may have different competitive
conditions, consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns than our existing markets, which may cause our new restaurants to be less successful than restaurants in our existing markets or to incur losses. An additional risk of expanding into
new markets is the lack of market awareness of the Pollo Tropical or Taco Cabana brand. Restaurants opened in new markets may open at lower average weekly sales volumes than restaurants opened in existing markets, and may have higher
restaurant-level operating expense ratios than in existing markets. Sales at restaurants opened in new markets may take longer to reach average unit volumes, if at all, thereby adversely affecting our consolidated operating results.



50



---

##### Table of Contents

Changes in consumer taste could negatively impact our business.

We obtain a significant portion of our revenues from the sale of hamburgers, chicken, various types of sandwiches, and Mexican and other ethnic foods. The
quick-casual and quick-service restaurant segments are characterized by the frequent introduction of new products, often accompanied by substantial promotional campaigns and are subject to changing consumer preferences, tastes, and eating and
purchasing habits. Our success depends on our ability to anticipate and respond to changing consumer preferences, tastes and eating and purchasing habits, as well other factors affecting the restaurant industry, including new market entrants and
demographic changes. We may be forced to make changes in our menu items in order to respond to changes in consumer tastes or dining patterns, and we may lose customers who do not prefer the new menu items. In recent years, numerous companies in the
quick-casual and quick-service restaurant segments have introduced products positioned to capitalize on the growing consumer preference for food products that are, or are perceived to be, healthy, nutritious, low in calories and low in fat content.
If we do not or, in the case of our Burger King restaurants, if BKC does not, continually develop and successfully introduce new menu offerings that appeal to changing consumer preferences or if we do not timely capitalize on new products, our
operating results will suffer. In addition, any significant event that adversely affects consumption of our products, such as cost, changing tastes or health concerns, could adversely affect our financial performance.

If a significant disruption in service or supply by any of our suppliers or distributors were to occur, it could create disruptions in the operations of our
restaurants, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our financial performance is dependent on our continuing
ability to offer fresh, premium quality food at competitive prices. If a significant disruption in service or supply by certain of our suppliers or distributors were to occur, it could create disruptions in the operations of our restaurants, which
could have a material adverse effect on us.

For our Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants, we have negotiated directly with local and
national suppliers for the purchase of food and beverage products and supplies. Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants food and supplies are ordered from approved suppliers and are shipped via distributors to the restaurants. For our Pollo
Tropical restaurants, Henry Lee, a division of Gordon Food Service, serves as our primary distributor of food and paper products. For our Taco Cabana restaurants, SYGMA Network, Inc. serves as our primary distributor of food and beverage products
and supplies. We also rely on Pilgrims Pride (formerly Conagra) and Gold Kist as our two suppliers of chicken for our Pollo Tropical restaurants and if either supplier is unable to service us, this could lead to a material disruption of
service or supply until a new supplier is engaged. With respect to our distributors for our Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants, if any of our distributors is unable to service us, this could lead to a material disruption of service or supply
until a new distributor is engaged, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If labor costs increase, we may not be able to make a
corresponding increase in our prices and our operating results may be adversely affected.

Wage rates for a substantial number of our
employees are at or slightly above the minimum wage. As federal and/or state minimum wage rates increase, we may need to increase not only the wage rates of our minimum wage employees but also the wages paid to the employees at wage rates which are
above the minimum wage, which will increase our costs. To the extent that we are not able to raise our prices to compensate for increases in wage rates, this could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

The efficiency and quality of our competitors advertising and promotional programs could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of
operations and financial condition.

Should our competitors increase spending on advertising and promotion, should the cost of
television or radio advertising increase, should our advertising funds materially decrease for any reason, or should our advertising and promotion be less effective than our competitors, there could be a material adverse effect on our
consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

Newly acquired or developed restaurants may reduce sales at our neighboring restaurants.

We intend to continue to open restaurants in our existing core markets, particularly the core markets served by our Pollo Tropical and
Taco Cabana restaurants. To the extent that we open a new restaurant in the vicinity of one or more of our existing restaurants within the same chain, it is possible that some of the customers who previously patronized those existing restaurants may
choose to patronize the new restaurant instead, reducing sales at those existing restaurants. Accordingly, to the extent we open new restaurants in our existing markets, sales at some of our existing restaurants in those markets may decline.



51



---

##### Table of Contents

Our business is regional and we therefore face risks related to reliance on certain markets.

As of December 31, 2004, excluding our franchised locations, all of our Pollo Tropical restaurants were located in Florida and approximately 94% of
our Taco Cabana restaurants were located in Texas. Also, as of December 31, 2004, 65% of our Burger King restaurants were located in New York and Ohio. Therefore, the economic conditions, state and local government regulations, weather
conditions or other conditions affecting Florida, Texas, New York and Ohio and the tourism industry affecting Florida may have a material impact on the success of our restaurants in those locations. For example, the events of September 11, 2001
had a significant negative impact on tourism in Florida, which adversely impacted the revenues and operating results at our Pollo Tropical restaurants.

We cannot assure you that the current locations of our existing restaurants will continue to be economically viable or that additional locations will be acquired at reasonable costs.

The location of our restaurants has significant influence on their success. We cannot assure you that current locations will continue to be economically
viable or that additional locations can be acquired at reasonable costs. In addition, the economic environment where restaurants are located could decline in the future, which could result in potentially reduced sales in those locations. We cannot
assure you that new sites will be as profitable as existing sites.

If the sale/leaseback market requires significantly higher yields, we may not enter
into sale/leaseback transactions and as a result would not receive the related net proceeds.

From time to time, we sell our restaurant
properties in sale/leaseback transactions. We historically have used, and intend to use, the net proceeds from such transactions to reduce outstanding debt and fund future capital expenditures for new restaurant development. However, the
sale/leaseback market may cease to be a reliable source of additional cash flows for us in the future if capitalization rates become less attractive or other unfavorable market conditions develop. For example, should the sale/leaseback market
require significantly higher yields, we may not enter into sale/leaseback transactions, which could adversely affect our ability to reduce outstanding debt and fund new capital expenditures for future restaurant development.

The loss of the services of our senior executives could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Our success depends to a large extent upon the continued services of our senior management, including Alan Vituli, Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Daniel T. Accordino, President and Chief Operating Officer, who have substantial experience in the restaurant industry. We believe that it would be extremely difficult to replace Messrs. Vituli and Accordino
with individuals having comparable experience. Consequently, the loss of the services of Mr. Vituli or Mr. Accordino could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Government regulation could adversely affect our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to extensive laws and regulations relating to the development and operation of restaurants, including regulations relating to the
following:



| |  |  | zoning;
| | - |  | -------



| |  |  | the preparation and sale of food;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------



| |  |  | liquor licenses which allow us to serve alcoholic beverages at our Taco Cabana restaurants;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | employer/employee relationships, including minimum wage requirements, overtime, working and safety conditions, and citizenship requirements;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | federal and state laws that prohibit discrimination and laws regulating design and operation of facilities, such as the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | federal and state regulations governing the operations of franchises, including rules promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the event that legislation having a negative impact on our business is adopted, you should be aware that it could have a material adverse impact on
us. For example, substantial increases in the minimum wage could adversely affect our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Local zoning or building codes or regulations can cause substantial delays in our ability to build and
open new restaurants.



52



---

##### Table of Contents

If one of our employees sells alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated or minor patron, we may be liable to third parties
for the acts of the patron.

We serve alcoholic beverages at our Taco Cabana restaurants and are subject to the dram-shop
statutes of the jurisdictions in which we serve alcoholic beverages. Dram-shop statutes generally provide that serving alcohol to an intoxicated or minor patron is a violation of the law.

In most jurisdictions, if one of our employees sells alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated or minor patron we may be liable to third parties for the acts
of the patron. We cannot guarantee that those patrons will not be served or that we will not be subject to liability for their acts. Our liquor liability insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover any potential liability and insurance may not
continue to be available on commercially acceptable terms or at all, or we may face increased deductibles on such insurance. Any increase in the number or size of dram-shop claims could have a material adverse effect on us as a result of
the costs of defending against such claims; paying deductibles and increased insurance premium amounts; implementing improved training and heightened control procedures for our employees; and paying any damages or settlements on such claims.

Federal, state and local environmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge, emission and disposal of hazardous materials could expose
us to liabilities, which could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations.

We are subject to a variety of federal, state
and local environmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge, emission and disposal of hazardous materials. We own and lease numerous parcels of real estate on which our restaurants are located.

Failure to comply with environmental laws could result in the imposition of severe penalties or restrictions on operations by governmental agencies or
courts of law that could adversely affect our operations. Also, if contamination is discovered on properties owned or operated by us, including properties we owned or operated in the past, we can be held liable for severe penalties and costs of
remediation. These penalties could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations.

We may, in the future, seek to pursue acquisitions and we
may not find restaurant companies that are suitable acquisition candidates or successfully operate or integrate any restaurant companies we may acquire.

We may in the future seek to acquire other restaurant chains. Although we believe that opportunities for future acquisitions may be available from time to time, increased competition for acquisition candidates exists
and may continue in the future. Consequently, there may be fewer acquisition opportunities available to us as well as higher acquisition prices. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, acquire, manage or successfully integrate
acquired restaurant companies without substantial costs, delays or operational or financial problems. In the event we are able to acquire other restaurant companies, the integration and operation of the acquired restaurants may place significant
demands on our management, which could adversely affect our ability to manage our existing restaurants. We also face the risk that our existing systems, procedures and financial controls will be inadequate to support any restaurant chains we may
acquire and that we may be unable to successfully integrate the operations and financial systems of any chains we may acquire with our own systems. While we may evaluate and discuss potential acquisitions from time to time, we currently have no
understandings, commitments or agreements with respect to any acquisitions. We may be required to obtain additional financing to fund future acquisitions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable
terms or at all. Both the new senior credit facility and the Indenture governing the notes contain restrictive covenants that may prevent us from incurring additional debt or acquiring additional restaurant chains.

Our failure or inability to enforce our trademarks or other proprietary rights could adversely affect our competitive position or the value of our brand.

We own certain common law trademark rights and a number of federal and international trademark and service mark registrations,
including the Pollo Tropical name and logo and Taco Cabana name and logo, and proprietary rights relating to certain of our core menu offerings. We believe that our trademarks and other proprietary rights are important to our success and our
competitive position. We, therefore, devote appropriate resources to the protection of our trademarks and proprietary rights. The protective actions that we take, however, may not be enough to prevent unauthorized usage or imitation by others, which
could harm our image, brand or competitive position and, if we commence litigation to enforce our rights, cause us to incur significant legal fees.



53



---

##### Table of Contents

We are not aware of any assertions that our trademarks or menu offerings infringe upon the proprietary
rights of third parties, but we cannot assure you that third parties will not claim infringement by us in the future. Any such claim, whether or not it has merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause delays in introducing new
menu items in the future or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. As a result, any such claim could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and consolidated financial condition.

Our failure to comply with the covenants contained in the new senior credit facility, the Indenture governing the notes or our other debt agreements, including as a
result of events beyond our control, could result in an event of default that could materially and adversely affect our consolidated operating results and financial condition.

Our new senior credit facility requires us to maintain specified financial ratios, including fixed charge coverage, senior leverage and total leverage
ratios (as such terms are defined in the new senior credit facility). In addition, our new senior credit facility and the Indenture governing the notes require us to comply with various operational and other covenants. If there were an event of
default under any of our debt instruments that was not cured or waived, the holders of the defaulted debt could cause all amounts outstanding with respect to the debt to be due and payable immediately, which in turn would result in cross defaults
under our other debt instruments. Our assets and cash flow may not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt instruments, either upon maturity or if accelerated upon an event of default.

If, when required, we are unable to repay, refinance or restructure our indebtedness under, or amend the covenants contained in, our new senior credit
facility, or if a default otherwise occurs, the lenders under our new senior credit facility could elect to terminate their commitments thereunder, cease making further loans, declare all borrowings outstanding, together with accrued interest and
other fees, to be immediately due and payable, institute foreclosure proceedings against those assets that secure the borrowings under our new senior credit facility and prevent us from making payments on the notes. Any such actions could force us
into bankruptcy or liquidation, and we cannot provide any assurance that we could repay our obligations under the notes in such an event.

The interests
of the stockholders of Carrols Holdings may be unique.

Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC and affiliated investment funds and BIB Holdings
(Bermuda) Ltd. control Carrols Holdings, our company and each of the guarantors of the notes. Madison Dearborn and BIB together will continue to have the ability to designate a majority of the board of directors of our company and Carrols Holdings,
and will be able to select our senior management team, determine our corporate and management policies and make decisions relating to fundamental corporate actions. The directors will have the authority to make decisions affecting our capital
structure, including the issuance of additional debt and declaration of dividends. In addition, the directors may authorize transactions, such as acquisitions, that could enhance the equity investment of Madison Dearborn and BIB while involving
risks to the interest of holders of the notes. The interests of Madison Dearborn and BIB may be unique and not be aligned with each other or any other party. See Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

There are restrictions on the ability to transfer or resell
the notes without registration under applicable securities laws.

The notes were offered and sold pursuant to an exemption from
registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and applicable state securities laws. Therefore, transfer or sale of the notes in the United States may occur only in a transaction registered under or exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and applicable state securities laws, which may cause a holder to be required to bear the risk of its investment for an indefinite period of time. We have agreed to use our reasonable best
efforts to commence an offer to exchange the notes for equivalent notes registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or, in certain circumstances, to register the reoffer and resale of the notes under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, but we cannot give any assurance that the necessary registration statement will become or remain effective.

There is no established trading
market for the notes, and no market for the notes may develop.

The notes, and, if issued, the exchange notes, are new issues of
securities for which there is no established trading market. We do not intend to have the notes listed on a national securities exchange or to arrange for quotation on any automated dealer quotation system, although we expect that the notes will
continue to be eligible for trading in The PORTAL Market. We have been advised a market has been made in the notes, and the exchange notes, if issued, as permitted by applicable laws and regulations. However, no one is obligated to make a market in
the Notes or, if issued, the exchange notes, and such market makers may discontinue their activity at any time without notice. Therefore, an active market for the notes or, if issued, the exchange notes, may not develop or, if developed, continue.
Historically, the market for non-investment grade debt has been subject to substantial volatility, which could adversely affect the prices at which the notes or, if issued,



54



---

##### Table of Contents

the exchange notes may be sold. In addition, subsequent to their initial issuance, the notes, and, if issued, the exchange notes, may trade at a discount
from their initial offering price, depending upon prevailing interest rates, the market for similar notes, our operating performance and other factors.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to market risk associated with fluctuations in interest rates, primarily limited to our senior credit facility. There were no borrowings
outstanding under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2004 and $220 million of borrowings outstanding under the term loan B facility. Revolving loans under our senior credit facility bear interest at a per annum rate, at our option of
either:



| | 1) | the greater of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus .50%, plus a margin ranging from .50% to 1.50% based on the Companys total leverage ratio; or
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.0% to 3.0% based on the Companys total leverage ratio.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Borrowings under the term loan B facility bear interest at a per annum rate, at the Companys option, of either:



| | 1) | the greater of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus .50%, plus a margin ranging from .75% to 1.0% based on the Companys total leverage ratio; or
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.25% to 2.50% based on the Companys total leverage ratio.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A 1% change in interest rates would have resulted in an increase or decrease in interest expense of approximately $1.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004.

Commodity Price Risk

We purchase certain products which are affected by commodity prices and are, therefore, subject to price volatility caused by weather, market conditions and other factors which are not considered predictable or within our control. Although
many of the products purchased are subject to changes in commodity prices, certain purchasing contracts or pricing arrangements have been negotiated in advance to minimize price volatility. Where possible, we use these types of purchasing techniques
to control costs as an alternative to directly managing financial instruments to hedge commodity prices. In many cases, we believe we will be able to address commodity cost increases that are significant and appear to be long-term in nature by
adjusting our menu pricing. However, long-term increases in commodity prices may result in lower restaurant-level operating margins.

ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The Index to Financial Statements attached hereto is set forth in Item 15.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There have been no changes in or disagreements with our independent registered public accountants on accounting or financial disclosures.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Restatement. As discussed in the Explanatory Note to this Form 10K/A, we have amended our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2005 to restate our consolidated financial statements for the 2004,
2003 and 2002 fiscal years. Refer to Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a complete discussion of the restatement.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our senior management is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d  15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in
the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuers management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing
similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.



55



---

##### Table of Contents

We have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as other key members of our management. In the evaluation,
we considered the restatement of our financial statements as discussed in detail in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II-Item 15. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of January 2, 2005.

Material Weaknesses in Internal Control
Over Financial ReportingA material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 2), or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management identified the following material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2005:

Personnel

In conjunction with filing this Form
10-K/A, which included the restatements as discussed in Note 2 to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements, management concluded that the Company did not have sufficient personnel with the appropriate knowledge and expertise to identify
and resolve certain complex accounting and tax matters. In addition, the Company did not perform the appropriate level of review commensurate with the Companys financial reporting requirements to ensure the consistent execution of its
responsibility in the areas of monitoring of controls, the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting policies and disclosures to support its accounting, tax and reporting functions. This material weakness contributed to certain of the
material weaknesses discussed below.

Controls over Applying the Lease Financing Method, SFAS No. 98 and Lease Accounting Policies

(a) Controls over the application of the financing method required under SFAS No. 98, with respect to the depreciation of assets subject to lease
financing obligations and the selection of the appropriate interest rate to apply to such financing obligations, were ineffective resulting in the failure to identify misstatements in property and equipment, lease financing obligations, deferred
income-sale/leaseback transactions, depreciation expense, interest expense and rent expense.

(b) Controls to identify leases that
contained provisions which constitute forms of continuing involvement requiring real estate transactions to be accounted for as financing transactions rather than as sale/leaseback transactions were ineffective. This resulted in the Companys
failure to identify misstatements in property and equipment, lease financing obligations, deferred income-sale/leaseback transactions, depreciation expense, interest expense and rent expense.

(c) Controls over the selection and application of lease accounting policies were not effective in determining lease terms for leasehold amortization
periods and recording acquisitions of leases with non-level or above-market rentals which failed to identify misstatements in property and equipment, goodwill, deferred lease liability, depreciation expense, amortization expense and rent expense.

Controls Related to Acquired Intangibles and Deferred Taxes in Conjunction with Acquisitions

(a) Controls over the application of SFAS No. 142 Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142) were not
effective in the evaluation of the amortization lives of franchise rights and the recording of deferred income tax liabilities related to franchise rights at the acquisition date resulting in misstatements of franchise rights, deferred income tax
liabilities, income tax expense, and amortization expense.

(b) Controls related to the preparation, periodic analysis and recording of
deferred taxes resulting from differences in financial reporting and tax bases of acquired assets and liabilities were not effective resulting in misstatements of deferred income tax assets and liabilities, goodwill and goodwill amortization expense
as well as the related footnotes.

Controls Over Certain Financial Statement Disclosures

(a) Controls over the preparation of the guarantor footnote disclosures were not effective resulting in the improper allocation of corporate general and
administrative and income tax expenses from the parent company only to the guarantor subsidiaries in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

(b) Controls over the preparation of the statements of cash flows were not effective resulting in (i) the improper classification of the proceeds
from qualifying sale leaseback transactions as financing cash flows versus investing cash flows and (ii) the improper recording of the amount of capital expenditures and changes in accounts payable which did not exclude non-cash expenditures.
These weaknesses resulted in the misstatements of the amount of net cash provided from (used for) operating activities, investing activities, financing activities and the amount of cash capital expenditures and in the changes in accounts payable.



56



---

##### Table of Contents

Controls Over Stock Option Accounting

Controls over the application of variable accounting for stock option agreements that contained several dividend provisions were not effective which
failed to identify a misstatement in stock-based compensation expense.

The control deficiencies described above resulted in the
restatement of the Companys consolidated financial statements for 2004, 2003 and 2002, and the unaudited quarterly financial information for 2004 and 2003, as well as audit adjustments to the 2004 consolidated financial statements.
Additionally, each of these control deficiencies could result in the material misstatement of the aforementioned accounts that would result in material misstatements to annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.
Accordingly, management has determined at January 2, 2005 that each of these control deficiencies constituted material weaknesses.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial ReportingNo change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2004 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.

Remediation of Material Weaknesses.Through the date of the filing of this
Form 10-K/A, we have remediated the following material weaknesses: item (c) under Controls over Applying the Lease Financing Method, SFAS No. 98 and Lease Accounting Policies; item (a) under Controls Related to Acquired Intangibles
and Deferred Taxes in Conjunction with Acquisitions; item (a) under Controls Over Certain Financial Statement Disclosures; and Controls Over Stock Option Accounting, as described above and have taken the following steps to improve our internal
controls.



| | (a) | We have made improvements with respect to the controls over leasing transactions in the application of lease accounting policies in determining lease terms, the assignment of
appropriate lives for leasehold improvements and intangible assets related to leases, and recording the acquisitions of leases with non-level rents and, in that regard we have: (i) performed staff training and enhanced our management review
over our procedures in determining the definition of lease term and the assignment of appropriate depreciable lives to leasehold improvements and intangible assets related to leases in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles,
and; (ii) enhanced documentation procedures to ensure appropriate accounting for straight-line rent expense for any acquired businesses;
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | We implemented procedures to appropriately apply variable accounting with regards to certain stock options. In addition, all stock options were cancelled and terminated during the
quarter ended July 3, 2005;
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | We improved our controls over the application of SFAS 142 in evaluating the amortization lives of franchise rights. We will continue to review any factors that would alter the
remaining lives of our franchise rights as circumstances change;
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (d) | We developed procedures to ensure that corporate general and administrative expenses and income tax expenses are properly allocated between the parent company only and
guarantor subsidiaries; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (e) | We have hired two senior-level finance professionals to augment the Companys controls and procedures pertaining to financial reporting.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition, we plan to take the following steps to remediate the material weaknesses at January 2, 2005 identified as a result of our evaluation:



| | (a) | establish procedures to properly depreciate assets subject to lease financing obligations and select the appropriate interest rate to apply under financing method required by SFAS
No. 98;
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | implement a more formalized review process including the involvement of both legal and accounting personnel to identify forms of continuing involvement in sale/leaseback
transactions;
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | further formalize, document and enhance the procedures and analysis around the reconciliation of deferred tax balances to the underlying financial reporting and tax bases; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (d) | hire additional accounting personnel with the appropriate expertise.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



57



---

##### Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The following table sets forth information about our
current directors, executive officers and other named officers.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                       
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Name                   |  | Age |  | Position                                              
|Alan Vituli            |  | 63  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer     
|Daniel T. Accordino    |  | 54  |  | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director       
|Paul R. Flanders       |  | 48  |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
|Joseph A. Zirkman      |  | 45  |  | Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary         
|Timothy J. LaLonde     |  | 48  |  | Vice President, Controller                            
|Michael A. Biviano     |  | 48  |  | Executive Vice President - Taco Cabana                
|James E. Tunnessen     |  | 50  |  | Executive Vice President - Pollo Tropical             
|Lewis S. Shaye         |  | 50  |  | Chief Concept Officer                                 
|Benjamin D. Chereskin |  | 46  |  | Director                                              
|Brian F. Gleason*     |  | 38  |  | Director                                              
|Robin P. Selati*       |  | 39  |  | Director                                              
|Olaseni Adeyemi Sonuga |  | 50  |  | Director                                              
|Clayton E. Wilhite*   |  | 59  |  | Director                                              

---

|* | Current member of audit committee
|- | ---------------------------------

| | Current member of compensation committee
|- | ----------------------------------------

Alan
Vituli has been Chairman of the Board since 1986 and Chief Executive Officer since March 1992. Mr Vituli is also Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Holdings. Between 1983 and 1985, Mr. Vituli was
employed by Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc. as a Senior Vice President responsible for real estate transactions. From 1966 until joining Smith Barney, Mr. Vituli was associated with the accounting firm of Coopers &
Lybrand, first as an employee and for the last 10 years as a partner. Among the positions held by Mr. Vituli at Coopers & Lybrand was National Director of Mergers and Acquisitions. Before joining Coopers & Lybrand,
Mr. Vituli was employed in a family-owned restaurant business. From 1993 through our acquisition of Pollo Tropical in 1998, Mr. Vituli served on the board of directors of Pollo Tropical. Mr. Vituli also serves on the board of
directors of Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc.

Daniel T. Accordino has been President, Chief Operating Officer and a Director
since February 1993. Before that, Mr. Accordino served as Executive Vice PresidentOperations from December 1986 and as Senior Vice President of Carrols from April 1984. From 1979 to April 1984, he was Vice President of Carrols responsible
for restaurant operations, having previously served as our Assistant Director of Restaurant Operations. Mr. Accordino has been an employee of ours since 1972.

Paul R. Flanders has been Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer since April 1997. Before joining us, he was Vice President-Corporate Controller of Fays Incorporated, a retailing chain,
from 1989 to 1997, and Vice President-Corporate Controller for Computer Consoles, Inc., a computer systems manufacturer, from 1982 to 1989. Mr. Flanders was also associated with the accounting firm of Touche Ross & Co. from 1977 to
1982.

Joseph A. Zirkman has been Vice President and General Counsel since January 1993. He was appointed Secretary in February
1993. Before joining us, Mr. Zirkman was an associate with the New York City law firm of Baer Marks & Upham beginning in 1986.

Timothy J. LaLonde has been Vice President, Controller since July 1997. Before joining us, he was a controller at Fays Incorporated, a retailing chain, from 1992 to 1997. Prior to that, he was a Senior Audit Manager with the
accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP, where he was employed since 1978.

Michael A. Biviano has been Executive Vice
President of Taco Cabana since January 2002. Prior to that, he was Vice President  Regional Director of Operations for our Burger King restaurants since 1989, having served as a district supervisor since 1983. Mr. Biviano has been an
employee of ours since 1973.

James E. Tunnessen has been Executive Vice President of Pollo Tropical since August 2003. Prior to
that he was Vice President  Regional Director of Operations for our Burger King restaurants since 1989, having served as a district supervisor from 1979. Mr. Tunnessen has been an employee of ours since 1972.



58



---

##### Table of Contents

Lewis S. Shaye has been Chief Concept Officer since January 2005. Prior to joining Carrols
Corporation he was Senior Vice President of Brand and Product Development for Papa Ginos Holding Corporation (PGH), which owned, operated and franchised the Papa Ginos Pizza and DAngelo Grilled Sandwich brands. Mr. Shaye
joined PGH in 1992 as Vice President of Operations and was promoted to Senior Vice President of Brand and Product Development in September 1995. Prior to joining PGH in 1992, Mr. Shaye was Senior District Manager at Marriott Corporation where
his responsibilities included operational accountability for premier Marriott contract foodservice locations.

Benjamin D. Chereskin
has served as a Director since March 1997. Mr. Chereskin is a Managing Director of Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, a private equity firm, and co-founded the firm in 1993. Before that, Mr. Chereskin was with First Chicago Venture Capital
for nine years. Mr. Chereskin also serves on the board of directors of Tuesday Morning Corporation; NWL Holdings, Inc.; Cinemark, Inc.; and Family Christian Stores, Inc.

Brian F. Gleason has served as a Director since October 2003. Mr. Gleason is a Managing Director and Executive Vice President of Phoenix
Management Services, Inc., a national corporate revitalization advisory firm. Mr. Gleason has been affiliated with Phoenix Management Services since 1996 and serves on its board of directors. Prior to that, Mr. Gleason worked in Corporate
Finance for Reliance Insurance Company since 1991. Mr. Gleason also serves on the board of directors of Thompson Products, Inc; International Intimates, Inc.; and Springfield Service Corp. Mr. Gleason is serving on the Board of Directors
as a designee of BIB Holdings. See Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

Robin P. Selati has served as a
Director since March 1997. Mr. Selati is a Managing Director of Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, a private equity firm, and joined the firm in 1993. Before 1993, Mr. Selati was associated with Alex Brown & Sons Incorporated in the
consumer/retail investment banking group. Mr. Selati also serves on the board of directors of Peter Piper, Inc., Tuesday Morning Corporation; NWL Holdings, Inc.; Cinemark, Inc.; Beverages & More, Inc.; Family Christian Stores, Inc.;
Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. and Pierre Foods, Inc.

Olaseni Adeyemi Sonugahas served as a Director since March 2004.
Mr. Sonuga is the Interim Group General Manager of Bahrain International Bank E.C., a Bahraini publicly quoted international investment bank that he became associated with in 2002. The stockholders and creditors of Bahrain International Bank
agreed in May of 2004 to an asset realization protocol under which Bahrain International Banks assets will be liquidated. Between 1999 and 2002, Mr. Sonuga served as Advisor to the Chairman of Oman Aviation Services Company SAOG, an Omani
listed company that owns Oman Air and also provides airport services at all Omani airports. Prior to this, he was a Vice President at Taib Bank, a Bahraini listed company since 1997. In the period 1992 to 1997, he was employed as the Business
Services Manager of the National Drilling Company of Abu Dhabi, UAE. He began his career as a Chartered Accountant in the UK in 1979 when he joined Touche Rosss London office.

Clayton E. Wilhite has served as a Director since July 1997. Since January 1998, Mr. Wilhite has been with CFI Group, Inc., has been its
Managing Partner since May 1998, and has served on its board of directors since September 1998. CFI Group, Inc. is an international management consulting firm specializing in measuring customer satisfaction. Between 1996 and 1998, he was the
Chairman of Thurloe Holdings, L.L.C. From August 1996 through our acquisition of Pollo Tropical, Mr. Wilhite served on the board of directors of Pollo Tropical, Inc. Before 1996, Mr. Wilhite was with the advertising firm of DArcy
Masius Benton & Bowles, Inc. having served as its Vice Chairman from 1995 to 1996, as President of DMB&B/North America from 1988 to 1995, and as Chairman and Managing Director of DMB&B/St. Louis from 1985 to 1988.

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. Our executive officers
are chosen by the Board and serve at its discretion. All of our directors also serve as directors of Carrols Holdings.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our audit committee is comprised of Robin P. Selati, Clayton E. Wilhite and Brian F. Gleason. The Board of Directors has determined
that we have at least one audit committee financial expert, Robin P. Selati, serving on the audit committee. Mr. Selati is serving on the Board of Directors as a designee of Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital
Partners II, L.P., principal stockholders of Carrols Holdings, in accordance with Carrols Holdings stockholders agreement. Consequently Mr. Selati is not deemed to be an independent director as such term is used in the federal
securities laws. Because our securities are not listed on any national securities exchange or Nasdaq, we are not required to have independent members of our Board of Directors or any committee thereof, including our audit committee.



59



---

##### Table of Contents

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial officer, general counsel, controller and other principal financial accounting and executive
employees. Our Code of Ethics is posted on our website at http://www.carrols.com. All amendments and waivers to the Code of Ethics will be disclosed through the website.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following tables set forth certain information for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 for our Chief Executive Officer and our next four most highly compensated executive officers who served as executive officers of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2004 and
whose annual compensation exceeded $100,000. Stock option data refers to the stock options of Carrols Holdings.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION
TABLE



|                                                                       |      |                     |  |                                                         |         |                   |         |           |        |     |  |        |     | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ----------------- | ------- | --------- | ------ | --- |  | ------ | --- | 
|                                                                       |      | Annual Compensation |  | Long-TermCompensationSecuritiesUnderlyingOptions (#)(2) |         | OtherCompensation |        
|                                                                       |      |                     | 
|Name and Principal Position                                            |      | Year                |  | Salary                                                  |         | Bonus(1)          |         |          
|Alan Vituli Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer          |      | 2004                |  | $                                                       | 561,000 |                   | $       | 9,251,531 |        |    |  | $      |    | 
|                                                                       | 2003 |                     |  | 550,008                                                 |         |                   |        |           |       |     |  | 17,000 | (3)
|                                                                       | 2002 |                     |  | 525,000                                                 |         |                   | 551,250 |           | 39,045 |     |  | 17,000 | (3)
|Daniel T. Accordino President, Chief Operating Officer and Director    |      | 2004                |  | $                                                       | 428,400 |                   | $       | 4,837,852 |        |    |  | $      |    | 
|                                                                       | 2003 |                     |  | 420,000                                                 |         |                   |        |           |       |     |  | 7,125  | (3)
|                                                                       | 2002 |                     |  | 400,008                                                 |         |                   | 360,007 |           | 26,030 |     |  | 7,125  | (3)
|Michael A. Biviano Executive Vice President  Taco Cabana              |      | 2004                |  | $                                                       | 244,800 |                   | $       | 716,933   |        | 783 |  | $      |    | 
|                                                                       | 2003 |                     |  | 234,231                                                 |         |                   |        |           | 1,044  |     |  |       |    
|                                                                       | 2002 |                     |  | 215,000                                                 |         |                   | 92,020  |           | 2,610  |     |  |       |    
|Paul R. Flanders Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |      | 2004                |  | $                                                       | 214,200 |                   | $       | 698,011   |        | 500 |  | $      |    | 
|                                                                       | 2003 |                     |  | 210,000                                                 |         |                   |        |           | 500    |     |  |       |    
|                                                                       | 2002 |                     |  | 200,004                                                 |         |                   | 180,004 |           | 1,900  |     |  |       |    
|Joseph A. Zirkman Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary        |      | 2004                |  | $                                                       | 214,200 |                   | $       | 656,586   |        | 500 |  | $      |    | 
|                                                                       | 2003 |                     |  | 210,000                                                 |         |                   |        |           | 500    |     |  |       |    
|                                                                       | 2002 |                     |  | 200,004                                                 |         |                   | 180,004 |           | 1,900  |     |  |       |    

---

|(1) | We provide bonus compensation to our executive officers based on an individuals achievement of certain specified objectives and our achievement of specified increases in
stockholder value. In January 2005, we also made a compensatory bonus distribution of approximately $20.3 million to a number of employee option holders, including our executive officers, in conjunction with the December 2004 refinancing. Bonuses
earned in 2004 by Mr. Vituli, Mr. Accordino, Mr. Biviano, Mr. Flanders and Mr. Zirkman, included $8,662,481, $4,452,922, $492,377, $505,231 and $463,806, respectively, for amounts earned in conjunction with this special
bonus distribution. Of the bonuses earned in 2000 by Mr. Vituli, Mr. Accordino, Mr. Flanders and Mr. Zirkman, $120,177, $108,000, $40,625 and $38,500, respectively, was subject to deferral, one-third to be paid in each of the
three succeeding years provided that stockholder value was at least equal to what it was in the year that the bonus was earned. Two-thirds of the aforementioned amounts were paid in 2002 and 2003 and the final one-third was forfeited.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



60



---

##### Table of Contents

|(2) | Reflects stock option grants for shares of Carrols Holdings common stock. In the case of Mr. Biviano, stock option grants were made under the 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term
Incentive Plan and are presented after giving effect to the combination of all of Carrols Holdings series of common stock into a single series of common stock. See Description of Plans  Reclassification of Carrols Holdings Common
Stock. In addition, all stock option awards were cancelled and terminated effective May 3, 2005 in exchange for stock awards. See Description of Plans  2005 Stock Awards.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Represents the premiums paid by us prior to July 2003 for split-dollar life insurance policies whereby Mr. Vituli and Mr. Accordino have designated beneficiaries.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table sets forth information with respect to stock options granted to each of our named executive officers
during the year ended December 31, 2004:



|                       |  |                                                       |  |                                                                                          |   |    |                              |        |                |            |  |   |        |  |   |        
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | -- | ---------------------------- | ------ | -------------- | ---------- |  | - | ------ |  | - | -------
|                       |  | Option Grants in Last Fiscal YearIndividual Grants(1) |  | Potential RealizableValue at
AssumedAnnual Rates of Stock Appreciation forOption Term(4)
|                       |  | Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingOptionsGranted(1)        |  | % of TotalOptionsGranted toEmployeesin 2004(1)                                           |   |    | ExercisePrice(PricePerShare) |        | ExpirationDate |           
|Name                   |  |                                                       |  |                                                                                          |   | 5% |                              | 10%   
|Michael A. Biviano (2) |  | 783                                                   |  | 7.0                                                                                      | % |    | $                            | 184.60 |                | 12/31/2014 |  | $ | 90,902 |  | $ | 230,362
|Paul R. Flanders (3)   |  | 500                                                   |  | 4.5                                                                                      | % |    | $                            | 127.00 |                | 12/31/2014 |  | $ | 39,935 |  | $ | 101,203
|Joseph A. Zirkman (3)  |  | 500                                                   |  | 4.5                                                                                      | % |    | $                            | 127.00 |                | 12/31/2014 |  | $ | 39,935 |  | $ | 101,203

---

|(1) | All outstanding stock option awards were cancelled and terminated effective May 3, 2005 in exchange for the issuance of an identical number of shares of common stock. See
Description of Plans  2005 Stock Awards.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Stock option grants for Mr. Biviano became exercisable at the rate of 20% per year beginning on December 31, 2004. All amounts give effect to the combination of all
of Carrols Holdings series of common stock into one series of common stock. See Description of Plans Reclassification of Carrols Holdings Common Stock.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Stock option grants for Mr. Flanders and Mr. Zirkman were granted under the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan. These options were for Carrols Holdings common stock and became
exercisable at the rate of 25% per year beginning on December 31, 2004.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Potential realizable value is based on an assumption that the price of common shares appreciates at 5% and 10% annually (compounded) from the date of grant until the end of the
option term. These calculations are based on requirements promulgated by the SEC and are not intended to forecast possible future appreciation of the stock price.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the last fiscal year, no
executive officer of ours served as a director of or member of a compensation committee of any entity for which any of the persons serving on our Board of Directors or on the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is an executive officer.
The Compensation Committee is comprised of Messrs. Chereskin, Wilhite and Gleason.

Board of Directors

Directors Compensation. Directors who are our employees do not receive any additional compensation for serving as directors. Directors who
are not our employees receive a fee of $15,000 per annum, and Mr. Wilhite also receives an additional fee of $500 for each special board or committee meeting attended by him. All directors are reimbursed for all reasonable expenses they incur
while acting as directors, including as members of any committee of the Board of Directors.

Liability Limitation. As permitted
under the Delaware General Corporation Law, our Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that a director will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of a fiduciary duty owed to our stockholders or
us. By its terms and in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, however, this provision does not eliminate or limit the liability of any of our directors:



| |  |  | for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | for an act or omission not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit; or
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | for an improper declaration of dividends or purchase or redemption of our securities.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Indemnification. Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.



61



---

##### Table of Contents

Description of Plans

Employee Retirement Plan. We offer salaried employees the option to participate in the Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan (the Plan). Under the Plan, our contributions begin to vest after
one year and fully vest after five years of service. A year of service is defined as a plan year during which an employee completes at least 1,000 hours of service. We may elect to contribute on an annual basis to the Plan. Our contributions are
equal to 50% of the employees contribution to a maximum contribution of $520 annually for any plan year that we participate in an employee match. The Plan includes a pre-tax savings option pursuant to section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code in addition to a post-tax savings option. Participating employees may contribute up to 18% of their salary annually to either of the savings options, subject to other limitations. The employees have various investment options available under a
trust established by the Plan. The employees contributions may be withdrawn at any time, subject to restrictions on future contributions. Our matching contributions may be withdrawn by the employee under certain conditions of financial
necessity or hardship as defined in the Plan. Our contributions to the Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan totaled $432,000 and $426,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. For the 2004 plan year, we did not
make any matching contributions.

Bonus Plans. We have cash bonus plans designed to promote and reward excellent performance by
providing employees with incentive compensation. Key senior management executives of each operating division can be eligible for bonuses equal to varying percentages of their respective annual salaries determined by our performance as well as the
divisions performance.

Reclassification of Carrols Holdings Common Stock. On October 27, 2004, Carrols Holdings, our
sole stockholder, eliminated its tracking stock capital structure by combining all of its series of authorized common stock into one series of common stock. In this regard, on October 27, 2004 the authorized series of common stock
known as Carrols Holdings Pollo Tropical class of common stock and Carrols Holdings Taco Cabana class of common stock were each converted into the series of common stock known as Carrols Stock. Since October 27, 2004, the Carrols
Stock has been renamed and is now referred to as common stock. We refer to the above-described transaction as the Combination. In contemplation of the Combination on October 6, 2004, the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Carrols Holdings was amended to clarify certain general provisions relating to a combination of its three authorized series of common stock. In addition, effective October 27, 2004, the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Carrols Holdings
was further amended to give effect to the combination.

Prior to October 27, 2004, no shares of Carrols Holdings Pollo Tropical
class of common stock or Carrols Holdings Taco Cabana class of common stock were outstanding. However, as a result of the combination, each outstanding option to purchase a share of Carrols Holdings, Pollo Tropical class of common stock
pursuant to the 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan was converted on October 27, 2004 into an option to purchase 0.4144 shares of Carrols Holdings common stock. Similarly, each outstanding option to purchase a share of Carrols
Holdings Taco Cabana class of common stock pursuant to the 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan was converted on October 27, 2004 into an option to purchase 0.0522 shares of Carrols Holdings common stock. As a result of the
combination, options to purchase a total of 97,000 shares of Carrols Holdings Pollo Tropical class of common stock and 409,400 shares of Carrols Holdings Taco Cabana class of common stock outstanding immediately prior to October 27,
2004 were converted, effective as of October 27, 2004, into options to purchase a total of 61,656 shares of Carrols Holdings common stock. These options, which were previously granted under the 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan and
the 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan, continued to be governed by such applicable plan, each of which was amended as of October 27, 2004 to reflect the combination.



62



---

##### Table of Contents

Long-Term Incentive Plans. Carrols Holdings maintains several long-term incentive plans. These
plans and the number of shares reserved for issuance or grant under such plan as of December 31, 2004 are listed below. All outstanding stock option awards were cancelled and terminated effective May 3, 2005 in exchange for the issuance of
an identical number of shares of common stock. See Description of Plans  2005 Stock Awards.



|                                                                          |  |                                               |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------- | -
|                                                                          |  | Number of SharesReserved forIssuance or Grant |  
|Carrols Holdings Corporation 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan                |  | 189,325                                       |  
|Carrols Holdings Corporation 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan            |  | 10,000                                        |  
|Carrols Holdings Corporation 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan |  | 41,440                                        | *
|Carrols Holdings Corporation 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan    |  | 26,100                                        | *

---

|* | After giving effect to the combination referred to above.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------

These plans are designed to advance our interests by providing an additional incentive to attract, retain and motivate qualified and competent persons through the encouragement of stock ownership or stock appreciation rights. Under the
terms of these plans, Carrols Holdings may grant awards such as Incentive Stock Options (as defined under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code), nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
performance shares and performance units and other stock-based awards to certain of our employees, including executive officers, and our subsidiaries officers and employees. Eligibility under the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan is
limited to non-employee directors of our board of directors. Directors that are our employees or employees of Madison Dearborn or BIB, or any of their respective affiliates are not eligible under this plan.

The 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan permit the compensation committee of Carrols Holdings board of directors
to grant, from time to time, options to purchase shares of Carrols Holdings common stock. Prior to October 27, 2004, the 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan provided for the granting of options to purchase shares of Carrols
Holdings Pollo Tropical class of common stock and the 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan provided for the granting of options to purchase shares of Carrols Holdings Taco Cabana class of common stock. Effective October 27,
2004, the 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan and 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan were amended to provide for the granting of options to purchase Carrols Holdings common stock.

The vesting periods for options and the expiration dates for exercisability of options granted under these plans are determined by our compensation
committee; however, the exercise period for an option granted may not exceed 10 years from the date of the grant. In February, 2002, the compensation committee of Carrols Holdings extended the expiration date to February 29, 2012 for all
options granted prior to March 1, 2002 under the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan for all named executive officers and certain other of our officers. Carrols Holdings compensation committee determines the option exercise price per share of any
option granted; however, the option price per share of an option intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option will not be less than the fair market value of Carrols Holdings common stock on the date such option is granted. Payment of such option
exercise price will generally be made:



| |  |  | in cash;
| | - |  | --------



| |  |  | by delivering shares of Carrols Holdings common stock already owned by the holder of such options;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | by delivering a promissory note (except in the case of executive officers and directors);
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | by a combination of any of the foregoing, in accordance with the terms of the particular plan, the applicable stock option agreement and any applicable guidelines of our
compensation committee in effect at the time; or
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | by any other means approved by Carrols Holdings compensation committee.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

If the holder of an option issued pursuant to these plans (other than executive officers or directors) elects to pay the exercise price of such option by delivering a promissory note, such promissory note may be
either:



| |  |  | unsecured and fully recourse against the holder of such option; or
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



63



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | nonrecourse with respect to payment of the principal amount, recourse with respect to the payment of interest, and secured by the shares of Carrols Holdings common stock being
purchased by such exercise and by other assets having a fair market value equal to not less than 40% of the exercise price of such option. In either event, such note will mature on the fifth anniversary of the date of the note and bear interest at
the rate provided under Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to
these plans, in the event of a change of control (as defined in the respective plan) any and all options issued and outstanding will vest and become exercisable in full on the date of such change of control.

As soon as practicable but no later than 30 days before such change of control, Carrols Holdings compensation committee will notify any holder of an
option granted under the respective plan of such change of control. Further, upon a change of control that qualifies as an approved sale (as defined in the respective plan) in which outstanding Carrols Holdings common stock is converted or exchanged
for or becomes a right to receive any cash, property or securities other than illiquid consideration (as defined in the respective plan),



| | (1) | each option granted under the respective plan will become exercisable solely for the amount of such cash, property or securities that the holder of such option would have been
entitled to had such option been exercised immediately prior to such event;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the holder of such option will be given an opportunity to either:
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| | (a) | exercise such option prior to the consummation of the approved sale and participate in such sale as a holder of Carrols Holdings common stock; or
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | upon consummation of the approved sale, receive in exchange for such option consideration equal to the amount determined by multiplying:
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (x) | the same amount of consideration per share received by the holders in connection with the approved sale less the exercise price per share of such option by
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (y) | the number of shares of common stock represented by such option; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | to the extent such option is not exercised prior to or simultaneous with such approved sale, any such option will be canceled.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2005 Stock Awards

Effective May 3, 2005,
Carrols Holdings issued an aggregate of 260,600 shares of Carrols Holdings common stock in exchange for the cancellation and termination of an identical number of outstanding options to purchase shares of Carrols Holdings common stock. As a
consequence of the exchange, all outstanding stock options were cancelled and terminated. All shares were issued pursuant to stock award agreements, effective May 3, 2005, which provide that such shares are fully vested and non-forfeitable upon
issuance, but may not be sold or otherwise disposed of for a period of two years from the date of issuance. Such agreements also provide that up to an aggregate of 16% of each recipients shares (for those recipients that were issued 100 or
more shares) are subject to repurchase by Carrols Holdings (at its option) after December 31, 2006 under certain circumstances described in the award agreements. In addition, such shares may be subject to repurchase by Carrols Holdings (at its
option) in the event of a termination of employment before the occurrence of certain events.

Description of Employment Agreements

Vituli Employment Agreement. Effective as of May 3, 2005, Carrols entered into an extension of an employment agreement with Alan Vituli which
extended the term of an employment agreement dated January 1, 1995, as amended April 3, 1996, as further amended and restated on March 27, 1997, as further amended and extended on April 1, 2002 and as further extended on
November 11, 2004, between Carrols and Mr. Vituli upon the same terms and conditions as previously set forth in the employment agreement. Pursuant to the employment agreement, which will expire on December 31, 2006, Mr. Vituli
will continue to serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Carrols. The employment agreement is subject to automatic renewals for successive one-year terms unless either Mr. Vituli or we elect not to renew by
giving written notice to the other at least 90 days before a scheduled expiration date. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Vituli receive a base salary, which was $600,000 when the agreement was extended on May 3, 2005, and
provides that such amount be increased annually by at least $25,000 on each January 1. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Vituli participates in Carrols Executive Bonus Plan and any of our stock option plans applicable to
executive employees. The employment agreement also requires us to provide (or reimburse the insurance cost of) medical coverage for



64



---

##### Table of Contents

Mr. Vituli and his spouse for their respective lives and to maintain the premium payments on a split-dollar life insurance policy on the life of
Mr. Vituli providing a death benefit of $1.5 million payable to an irrevocable trust designated by Mr. Vituli. The Company no longer provides for premium payments on this policy. The employment agreement also provides that if
Mr. Vitulis employment is terminated without cause (as defined in the employment agreement) within six months following a change of control (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Vituli will receive a cash lump sum equal to
his salary during the previous 12 months. The employment agreement also provides that if Mr. Vitulis employment is terminated by Carrols without cause (other than following a change in control as described above) or Mr. Vituli
resigns with good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Vituli will receive a cash payment in an amount equal to 2.99 times his average salary plus average annual bonus for the prior five years. The employment agreement includes
non-competition and non-solicitation provisions effective during the term of the employment agreement and for two years following its termination.

Accordino Employment Agreement. Effective as May 3, 2005, Carrols entered into an extension of an employment agreement with Daniel T. Accordino which extended the term of an employment agreement dated January 1, 1995, as
amended April 3, 1996, as further amended and restated on March 27, 1997, as further amended and extended on April 1, 2002 and as further extended on November 11, 2004, between Carrols and Mr. Accordino upon the same terms
and conditions as previously set forth in the employment agreement. Pursuant to the employment agreement, which will expire on December 31, 2006, Mr. Accordino will continue to serve as President and Chief Operating Officer of Carrols. The
employment agreement is subject to automatic renewals for successive one-year terms unless either Mr. Accordino or we elect not to renew by giving written notice to the other at least 90 days before a scheduled expiration date. The employment
agreement provides that Mr. Accordino receive a base salary, which was $460,000 when the agreement was extended, and provides that such amount be increased annually by at least $20,000 on each January 1. Pursuant to the employment
agreement, Mr. Accordino participates in Carrols Executive Bonus Plan and any of our stock option plans applicable to executive employees. The employment agreement also requires us to provide (or reimburse the insurance cost of) medical
coverage for Mr. Accordino and his spouse for their respective lives and to maintain the premium payments on a split-dollar life insurance policy on the life of Mr. Accordino providing a death benefit of $1.0 million payable to an
irrevocable trust designated by Mr. Accordino. The Company no longer provides for premium payments on this policy. The employment agreement also provides that if Mr. Accordinos employment is terminated without cause (as defined in
the employment agreement) within six months following a change of control (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Accordino will receive a cash lump sum equal to his salary during the previous 12 months. The employment agreement also
provides that if Mr. Accordinos employment is terminated by Carrols without cause (other than following a change in control as described above) or Mr. Accordino resigns with good reason (as defined in the employment agreement),
Mr. Accordino will receive a cash payment in an amount equal to 2.99 times his average salary plus average annual bonus for the prior five years. The employment agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions effective during
the term of the employment agreement and for two years following its termination.

Option Agreements

Vituli and Accordino Option Agreements Pursuant to the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan. In March 1997, Carrols Holdings granted options to purchase
43,350 and 28,900 shares of its common stock under the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $101.7646 per share in exchange for options then held by the Vituli Family Trust and by Mr. Accordino, respectively. These options had
a term of 10 years from the date of grant and became exercisable at varying rates through December 31, 2000 at which time they became fully vested. On March 1, 2002, the expiration date for these options was extended to February 29,
2012.

On March 1, 2002, Carrols Holdings granted to Mr. Vituli and Mr. Accordino, under the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan,
options to purchase 39,045 and 26,030 shares of its common stock, respectively. These options had a term of 10 years from the date of grant, an exercise price of $113.00 per share and were immediately exercisable when issued.

All outstanding stock option awards were cancelled and terminated effective May 3, 2005 in exchange for the issuance of an identical number of
shares of common stock. See Description of Plans  2005 Stock Awards.

Non-Plan Option Agreements. In March 1997,
Carrols Holdings granted to Mr. Vituli, Mr. Accordino and Mr. Zirkman nonqualified stock options to purchase 29,480, 2,579 and 368 shares, respectively, of its common stock at an exercise price of $101.7646 per share. The options had
a term of 10 years from the date of grant and became exercisable on the five consecutive anniversaries of the date of grant. On March 1, 2002, the expiration date for these options was extended to February 29, 2012. These options had
substantially the same terms as options issued under the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to: (1) the method of payment of the exercise price of the option and (2) the effect of a change of control (as defined in the 1996
Long-Term Incentive Plan).



65



---

##### Table of Contents

All outstanding stock option awards were cancelled and terminated effective May 3, 2005 in exchange
for the issuance of an identical number of shares of common stock. See Description of Plans  2005 Stock Awards.

Change of Control Agreement. On December 27, 2002, we entered into a change of control agreement with each of Mr. Flanders, Mr. Zirkman, and four of our other officers. Each change of control agreement provides that if
within one year following a change of control (as defined in the change of control agreement) of either Carrols Holdings or Carrols, an employees employment is terminated by us without cause (as defined in the change of control agreement) or
by the employee for good reason (as defined in the change of control agreement), then such employee will be entitled to receive (a) a lump sum payment in the amount equal to one years salary at the then current rate, (b) a prorated
bonus payment through the date of termination and in accordance with the Executive Bonus Plan then in effect and (c) continued coverage under our welfare and benefits plans for such employee and his dependents for a period of up to one year or
sooner if such benefits are provided to the employee by a new employer. The payments and benefits due under each change of control agreement cannot be reduced by any compensation earned by the employee or any benefits provided to the employee as a
result of employment by another employer or otherwise. The payments are also not subject to any set-off, counterclaim, recoupment, defense or other right that we may have against the employee.



66



---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth the number and percentage of shares of voting common stock of Carrols and of Carrols Holdings
beneficially owned, as of May 31, 2005, by (i) each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock; (ii) each member of our current board of directors; (iii) each of our named executive officers;
and (iv) all members of our board of directors and our executive officers as a group.

The amounts and percentages of common stock
beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that
person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or direct the disposition of such security. A person is
also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. All persons listed have sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares unless otherwise indicated.



|                                                         |  |                          |  |            |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ---------- | -
|                                                         |  | Shares BeneficiallyOwned | 
|                                                         |  | Number                   |  | Percentage |  
|Stockholder of Carrols Corporation:                      |  |                          |  |            |  
|Carrols Holdings Corporation                             |  | 10                       |  | 100        | %
|Stockholders of Carrols Holdings Corporation: (1)(2)     |  |                          |  |            |  
|BIB Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd. (3)                          |  | 566,667                  |  | 40.2       | %
|Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P.                  |  | 283,333                  |  | 20.1       | %
|Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P.               |  | 283,334                  |  | 20.1       | %
|Alan Vituli (4)                                          |  | 121,702                  |  | 8.7        | %
|Daniel T. Accordino                                      |  | 58,369                   |  | 4.1        | %
|Paul R. Flanders                                         |  | 6,525                    |  | *          |  
|Joseph A. Zirkman                                        |  | 6,113                    |  | *          |  
|Timothy J. LaLonde                                       |  | 2,022                    |  | *          |  
|Michael A. Biviano                                       |  | 6,359                    |  | *          |  
|James E. Tunnessen                                       |  | 4,544                    |  | *          |  
|Lewis S. Shaye                                           |  | 2,000                    |  | *          |  
|Benjamin D. Chereskin                                    |  |                         |  |           |  
|Brian F. Gleason                                         |  |                         |  |           |  
|Robin P. Selati                                          |  |                         |  |           |  
|Olaseni Adeyemi Sonuga                                   |  |                         |  |           |  
|Clayton E. Wilhite                                       |  | 4,000                    |  | *          |  
|Directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons) |  | 211,634                  |  | 15.0       | %

---

|* | Less than 1%
|- | ------------

|(1) | The percentage of outstanding shares is based on 1,406,744 shares of common stock outstanding as of May 31, 2005. The number of shares of common stock shown in the table
includes shares that were issued on May 3, 2005 to executive officers and a director in exchange for the cancellation and termination of all of their existing stock options. The number of shares issued to each person was identical to the number
of stock options held and were as follows: 111,875 shares for Mr. Vituli; 57,509 shares for Mr. Accordino; 6,525 shares for Mr. Flanders; 5,990 shares for Mr. Zirkman; 2,022 shares for Mr. LaLonde; 6,359 shares for
Mr. Biviano; 4,544 shares for Mr. Tunnessen; 2,000 shares for Mr. Shaye and 4,000 shares for Mr. Wilhite.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The address of BIB Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd is c/o Dilmun Investments, Inc., 84 West Park Place, Stamford, CT 06901. The address of both Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and
Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P. is Three First National Plaza, Suite 3800, Chicago, IL 60602. The address of the directors and executive officers listed is c/o Carrols Corporation, 968 James Street, Syracuse, NY 13203.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | These 566,667 shares of common stock were previously owned by Atlantic Restaurants, Inc., which was formed to effect the acquisition of Carrols in 1996. Atlantic Restaurants, which
was a wholly-owned subsidiary of BIB Holdings, was merged into BIB Holdings on February 10, 1999. BIB Holdings is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bahrain International Bank. The stockholders and creditors of Bahrain International Bank agreed in
May 2004 to an asset realization protocol under which Bahrain International Banks assets will be liquidated.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | All shares are held by the Vituli Family Trust and deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Vituli.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



67



---

##### Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2004, with respect to all of Carrols Holdings compensation plans under which equity securities of Carrols Holdings are authorized for issuance:



|                                                           |  |                                                                                         |  |                                                                         |        |                                                           |       
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | --------------------------------------------------------- | ------
|Plan category                                              |  | Number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options,warrants and
rights |  | Weighted averageexercise price ofoutstandingoptions, warrantsand rights |        | Number ofsecurities remainingavailable for futureissuance
|Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:    |  |                                                                                         |  |                                                                         |        |                                                           |       
|1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan                              |  | 185,597                                                                                 |  | $                                                                       | 110.22 |                                                           | 3,226 
|1998 Directors Stock Option Plan                          |  | 4,000                                                                                   |  | $                                                                       | 118.38 |                                                           | 6,000 
|1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan               |  | 19,503                                                                                  |  | $                                                                       | 153.40 |                                                           | 492   
|2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan                  |  | 20,809                                                                                  |  | $                                                                       | 156.46 |                                                           | 5,291 
|Non-Plan Options                                           |  | 32,427                                                                                  |  | $                                                                       | 101.76 |                                                           |      
|                                                           |  |                                                                                         |  |                                                                         |        |                                                           |       
|Subtotal                                                   |  | 262,336                                                                                 |  | $                                                                       | 116.18 |                                                           | 15,009
|Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |  |                                                                                        |  |                                                                         |       |                                                           |      
|                                                           |  |                                                                                         |  |                                                                         |        |                                                           |       
|Total                                                      |  | 262,336                                                                                 |  | $                                                                       | 116.18 |                                                           | 15,009
|                                                           |  |                                                                                         |  |                                                                         |        |                                                           |       

All outstanding stock option awards were cancelled and terminated effective May 3, 2005 in
exchange for the issuance of an identical number of shares of common stock. See Description of Plans  2005 Stock Awards.



|ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------

Stockholders Agreement. On March 27, 1997, in connection with the investment by Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., all holders of Carrols Holdings common stock entered
into a Stockholders Agreement. In general, the agreement (as amended in October 2003) provides that all holders of Carrols Holdings common stock will vote their common stock in order to cause the following individuals to be elected to the
Board of Directors of Carrols Holdings and each of its subsidiaries (including us):



| | (a) | three representatives designated collectively by Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., provided that the third designee shall not
be entitled to remain on the Board of Directors unless BIB Holdings has three designees serving on the Board of Directors at such time (so long as BIB Holdings is entitled to three Board designees at such time) subject to adjustment if the
percentage holdings of Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P. collectively, decreases below a certain threshold;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | three representatives designated by BIB Holdings, provided that the third designee shall not be entitled to remain on the Board of Directors unless Madison Dearborn has three
designees serving on the Board of Directors at such time (so long as Madison Dearborn is entitled to three Board designees at such time), subject to adjustment if the percentage holdings of BIB Holdings decreases below a certain threshold; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | two representatives designated by Mr. Vituli as long as Mr. Vituli is our Chief Executive Officer.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Currently, Messrs. Chereskin and Selati are serving on the Board of Directors as designees of Madison Dearborn, Messrs. Gleason, Sonuga and Wilhite are
serving on the Board of Directors as designees of BIB Holdings and Messrs. Vituli and Accordino are serving on the Board of Directors as designees of Mr. Vituli. Pursuant to the stockholders agreement as currently in effect, Madison Dearborn
has the right, at any time, to either cause a third designee to be elected to the Board of Directors or cause the removal of a third BIB Holdings designee from the Board of Directors.

In addition, the agreement provides for certain limitations on the ability of holders of Carrols Holdings common stock to sell, transfer, assign,
pledge or otherwise dispose of their common stock. The agreement contains covenants requiring us to obtain the prior consent of Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P., Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., and BIB Holdings before taking
certain actions including the redemption, purchase or other acquisition of Carrols Holdings capital stock, changing the capital budget approved by Carrols Holdings Board of Directors for that year or the entry into the ownership, active
management or operation of any business other than Burger King franchise restaurants.



68



---

##### Table of Contents

Registration Rights Agreement. On March 27, 1997, in connection with the investment by
Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., those entities, BIB Holdings, Alan Vituli, Daniel T. Accordino and Joseph A. Zirkman entered into a registration agreement with Carrols Holdings. The
registration agreement provides for demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to Carrols Holdings common stock. Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P. or BIB Holdings may demand
registration under the Securities Act of all or any portion of their shares of Carrols Holdings common stock or options for shares of Carrols Holdings common stock (the Registrable Securities), provided that:



| | (1) | in the case of the first demand registration, Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P., and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P. and BIB Holdings must consent to a demand
registration unless Carrols Holdings has completed a registered public offering of the Carrols Holdings common stock; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | all demand registrations on Form S-1 must be underwritten.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------

Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P. and Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., collectively, and BIB Holdings are each entitled to request:



| | (1) | three demand registrations on Form S-1 in which Carrols Holdings will pay all registration expenses, provided that the offering value of the Registrable Securities is at least $15
million; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | an unlimited number of demand registrations on Form S-3 in which Carrols Holdings will pay all registration expenses, provided that the offering value of the Registrable Securities
is at least $5 million with an underwritten offering equal to at least $10 million.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Whenever Carrols Holdings proposes to
register any of its securities (other than pursuant to a demand registration) and the registration form may be used for the registration of Registrable Securities, Carrols Holdings shall give prompt written notice to all holders of Registrable
Securities of its intention to effect such a registration and shall include in such registration all Registrable Securities to which Carrols Holdings has received written requests for inclusion in such registration within 20 days after receipt of
Carrols Holdings notice. Carrols Holdings shall pay the registration expenses of the holders of Registrable Securities in all such piggyback registrations. The Registration Agreement contains typical cut back provisions in
connection with both demand registrations and piggyback registrations. Carrols Holdings will provide the holders of the Registrable Securities with typical indemnification in the event of certain misstatements or omissions made in connection with
both demand registrations and piggyback registrations.



|ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|-------- | --------------------------------------

The
following table summarizes the aggregate fees billed to us by our independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP:



|                                   |  |                        |     |      |   |      
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | --- | ---- | - | -----
|                                   |  | Year EndedDecember 31,
|                                   |  | 2003                   |     | 2004
|                                   |  | (In thousands)        
|Audit Fees (a)                     |  | $                      | 322 |      | $ | 2,000
|Audit-Related Fees (b)             |  |                        | 4   |      |   | 507  
|                                   |  |                        |     |      |   |      
|Total Audit and Audit Related Fees |  |                        | 326 |      |   | 2,507
|Tax Fees (c)                       |  |                        | 48  |      |   | 114  
|All Other Fees (d)                 |  |                        | 7   |      |   |     
|                                   |  |                        |     |      |   |      
|Total                              |  | $                      | 381 |      | $ | 2,621
|                                   |  |                        |     |      |   |      

---

|(a) | Audit fees include services related to the audit of the Companys annual consolidated financial statements and review of the interim quarterly consolidated financial
statements. Audit fees for the year ended December 31, 2004 are amounts billed to date and are subject to finalization.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | Audit-related fees for 2003 were for annual employee benefit plan audits. Audit-related fees for 2004 were substantially in connection with our refinancing transactions during 2004
and $5,000 for employee benefit plan audits.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(c) | Fees for tax services billed in 2003 and 2004 consisted of $10,000 for tax compliance in each year and $38,000 and $104,000 respectively, for tax planning and advice, which included
an earnings and profits study.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(d) | Other fees for 2003 consisted of billings for actuarial services. PWC no longer provides actuarial services to the Company, effective in the third quarter of 2003.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



69



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                                                                                        |  |                       |   |  |      |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- | - |  | ---- | -
|                                                                                                                        |  | Year EndedDecember 31 |  
|                                                                                                                        |  | 2003                  |   |  | 2004 |  
|Percentage of Tax Planning and Advice Fees and All Other Fees to Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Compliance Fees |  | 13.4                  | % |  | 4.1  | %

In considering the nature of the services provided by the independent registered public
accountants, the Audit Committee determined that such services are compatible with the provision of independent audit services. The Audit Committee discussed these services with the independent auditor and Company management to determine that they
are permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Pre-Approval Policy

The services performed by the independent auditor in 2004 were pre-approved in
accordance with the pre-approval procedures adopted by the Audit Committee. All requests for audit, audit-related, tax, and other services must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval and cannot commence until such pre-approval
has been granted.



70



---

##### Table of Contents

PART IV



|ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|-------- | ------------------------------------------

(a) (1) Financial Statements



|                                                           |  |            
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------
|                                                           |  | Page       
|CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES                       |  |            
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm    |  | F-1        
|Financial Statements:                                      |  |            
|Consolidated Balance Sheets                                |  | F-2        
|Consolidated Statements of Operations                      |  | F-3        
|Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity |  | F-4        
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows                      |  | F-5        
|Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                 |  | F-6 to F-39

(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules



|         |  |                                   |  |     
|-------- |  | --------------------------------- |  | ----
|Schedule |  | Description                       |  | Page
|II       |  | Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |  | F-41

Schedules other than those listed are omitted for the reason that they are not required, not
applicable, or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

Separate financial statements of the
Company are not filed for the reasons that (1) consolidated statements of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries are filed and (2) the Company is primarily an operating Company and all subsidiaries included in the consolidated
financial statements filed are wholly-owned.

(a) (3) Exhibits

EXHIBIT INDEX



|              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|              | 
|3.1           |  | Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.(3)(a) to Carrols Corporations 1987 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                            
|              | 
|3.2           |  | Restated By-laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.(3)(b) to Carrols Corporations 1986 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                 
|              | 
|3.3           |  | Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Carrols Holdings Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Carrols Corporations September 30,
2001 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)
|              | 
|3.4           |  | Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Carrols Holdings Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Carrols Corporations Form 8-K filed on
November 1, 2004)              
|              | 
|3.5           |  | Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Carrols Holdings Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Carrols Corporations Form 8-K filed on
November 1, 2004)              



71



---

##### Table of Contents

|              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|              | 
|4.1           |  | Form of Stockholders Agreement by and among Carrols Holdings Corporation, Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P., Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., Atlantic Restaurants, Inc., Alan
Vituli, Daniel T. Accordino and Joseph A. Zirkman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Carrols Corporations 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                   
|              | 
|4.2           |  | First Amendment, dated as of October 14, 2003, to Carrols Holdings Corporation Stockholders Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Carrols Corporations 2004 Annual
Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                                                 
|              | 
|4.3           |  | Form of Registration Agreement by and among Carrols Holdings Corporation, Atlantic Restaurants, Inc., Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.P., Madison Dearborn Capital Partners II, L.P., Alan
Vituli, Daniel T. Accordino and Joseph A. Zirkman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Carrols Corporations 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                   
|              | 
|4.4           |  | Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 15, 2004, by and among Carrols Corporations, the Guarantors named therein, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC,
Lehman Brothers Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Carrols Corporations Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2004)
|              | 
|10.1 (1)      |  | Carrols Corporation 1996 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Carrols Corporation 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|              | 
|10.2 (1)      |  | Stock Option Agreement dated as of December 30, 1996 by and between Carrols Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Carrols Corporation 1996 Annual Report
on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                                               
|              | 
|10.3 (1)      |  | Stock Option Agreement dated as of December 30, 1996 by and between Carrols Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Carrols Corporation 1996 Annual
Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                                       
|              | 
|10.4 (1)      |  | Form of Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 27, 1997 by and between Carrols Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Carrols
Corporations 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                    
|              | 
|10.5 (1)      |  | Form of Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 27, 1997 by and between Carrols Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Carrols
Corporations 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                            
|              | 
|10.6 (1)      |  | Form of Carrols Holdings Corporation 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Carrols Corporations 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|              | 
|10.7 (1)      |  | Form of Stock Option Agreement by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Carrols Corporations 1996 Annual Report on Form
10-K)                                                                                                                                                                                          
|              | 
|10.8 (1)      |  | Form of Stock Option Agreement by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Carrols Corporations 1996 Annual Report
on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                                                  
|              | 
|10.9 (1)      |  | Form of Unvested Stock Option Agreement by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Carrols Corporations 1996 Annual
Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                                                 
|              | 
|10.10 (1)     |  | Form of Unvested Stock Option Agreement by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Carrols Corporations 1996
Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                                         



72



---

##### Table of Contents

|              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|              | 
|10.11 (1)     |  | Form of Unvested Stock Option Agreement by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Joseph A. Zirkman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to Carrols Corporations 1996 Annual
Report on Form 10-K)                                  
|              | 
|10.12 (1)     |  | Carrols Holdings Corporation 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Carrols Corporation Form S-4 filed on February 2, 1999)                                                                            
|              | 
|10.13 (1)     |  | Carrols Holdings Corporation 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Carrols Corporations September 30, 1999 Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q)                                                  
|              | 
|10.14 (1)     |  | Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan dated April 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Carrols Corporations 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                            
|              | 
|10.15 (1)     |  | Carrols Holdings Corporation 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Carrols Corporations 2002 Annual Report on Form
10-K)                                                                     
|              | 
|10.16 (1)     |  | Carrols Corporation and Subsidiaries Deferred Compensation Plan dated January 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Carrols Corporations March 31, 2002 Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q)                                         
|              | 
|10.17 (1)     |  | Extension of Employment Agreement dated March 27, 2002 by and between Carrols Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Carrols Corporations June 30,
2002 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)                      
|              | 
|10.18 (1)     |  | Extension of Employment Agreement dated March 27, 2002 by and between Carrols Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Carrols Corporations
June 30, 2002 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)              
|              | 
|10.19 (1)     |  | Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan July 1, 2002 Restatement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Carrols Corporations September 29, 2002 Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q)                                                      
|              | 
|10.20 (1)     |  | Addendum incorporating EGTRRA Compliance Amendment to Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan dated September 12, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Carrols
Corporations September 29, 2002 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q)
|              | 
|10.21 (1)     |  | Carrols Corporation Change of Control Agreement dated December 27, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Carrols Corporations 2003 Annual Report on Form
10-K)                                                                    
|              | 
|10.22 (1)     |  | Extension of Stock Option Awards dated March 1, 2002 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to Carrols Corporations 2003
Annual Report on Form 10-K)                           
|              | 
|10.23 (1)     |  | Extension of Stock Option Awards dated March 1, 2002 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Carrols
Corporations 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                   
|              | 
|10.24 (1)     |  | Extension of Stock Option Awards dated March 1, 2002 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Paul Flanders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Carrols Corporations
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                         
|              | 
|10.25 (1)     |  | Extension of Stock Option Awards dated March 1, 2002 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Joseph Zirkman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to Carrols Corporations
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                        
|              | 
|10.26 (1)     |  | Extension of Stock Option Awards dated March 1, 2002 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Timothy LaLonde (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Carrols Corporations
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                       



73



---

##### Table of Contents

|              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|              | 
|10.27 (1)     |  | Extension of Stock Option Awards dated March 1, 2002 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Michael Biviano (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Carrols Corporations
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                            
|              | 
|10.28 (1)     |  | First Amendment, dated as of January 1, 2004, to Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to Carrols Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                                                    
|              | 
|10.29 (1)     |  | Carrols Holdings Corporation First Amended and Restated 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Carrols Corporations 2004 Annual
Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                                            
|              | 
|10.30 (1)     |  | Extension of Employment Agreement dated November 11, 2004 by and between Carrols Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.30 to Carrols Corporations 2004
Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                                    
|              | 
|10.31 (1)     |  | Extension of Employment Agreement dated as of May 3, 2005 by and between Carrols Corporation and Alan Vituli (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.31 to Carrols Corporations 2004
Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                                    
|              | 
|10.32 (1)     |  | Extension of Employment Agreement dated November 11, 2004 by and between Carrols Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.32 to Carrols Corporations
2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                            
|              | 
|10.33 (1)     |  | Extension of Employment Agreement dated as of May 3, 2005 by and between Carrols Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.33 to Carrols Corporations
2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                            
|              | 
|10.34 (1)     |  | Amendment to Carrols Holdings Corporation 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Carrols Corporations Form 8-K filed on November 1,
2004)                                                                                                                                                                                        
|              | 
|10.35 (1)     |  | Amendment to Carrols Holdings Corporation 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Carrols Corporations Form 8-K filed on November 1,
2004)                                                                                                                                                                                           
|              | 
|10.36         |  | Loan Agreement dated as of December 15, 2004, by and among Carrols Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Bank of America N.A., Wachovia Bank, National Association, Manufacturers and Traders
Trust Company, Suntrust Bank and other lenders now or hereafter partied hereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Carrols Corporations Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2004)
|              | 
|10.37         |  | Indenture dated as of December 15, 2004, by and among Carrols Corporation and the Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Carrols Corporations Form
8-K filed on December 21, 2004)                                                                                                                                                               
|              | 
|10.38 (1)     |  | Form of Stock Award Agreement of Carrols Holdings Corporation dated as of May 3, 2005 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.38 to Carrols Corporations 2004 Annual Report on Form
10-K)                                                                                                                                                                                           
|              | 
|10.39 (1)     |  | Form of Exchange Agreement dated as of May 3, 2005 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Vituli Family Trust (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.39 to Carrols
Corporations 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                          
|              | 
|10.40 (1)     |  | Form of Stock Award Agreement dated as of May 3, 2005 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Daniel T. Accordino (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.40 to Carrols
Corporations 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                       
|              | 
|10.41 (1)     |  | Form of Stock Award Agreement dated as of May 3, 2005 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Clayton E. Wilhite (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.41 to Carrols
Corporations 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                        
|              | 
|10.42 (1)     |  | Form of Stock Award Agreement dated as of May 3, 2005 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Paul Flanders (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.42 to Carrols Corporations
2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                             
|              | 
|10.43 (1)     |  | Form of Stock Award Agreement dated as of May 3, 2005 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Joseph Zirkman (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.43 to Carrols Corporations
2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                                                                            



74



---

##### Table of Contents

|              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|              | 
|10.44 (1)     |  | Form of Stock Award Agreement dated as of May 3, 2005 by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation and Michael Biviano (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.44 to Carrols Corporations
2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
|              | 
|21.1          |  | List of Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to exhibit 21.1 to Carrols Corporations 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K)                                                                                                  
|              | 
|31.1 (2)      |  | Chief Executive Officers Certificate Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                                                                                            
|              | 
|31.2 (2)      |  | Chief Financial Officers Certificate Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                                                                                            
|              | 
|32.1 (2)      |  | Chief Executive Officers Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                                             
|              | 
|32.2 (2)      |  | Chief Financial Officers Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                                             

---

|(1) | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement identified pursuant to this report.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Filed herewith.
|--- | ---------------



75



---

##### Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Shareholder of Carrols Corporation:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under
Item 15(a)(1), present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Carrols Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing
under Item 15(a)(2), presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 have been restated.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Syracuse, New York

July 27, 2005, except for the current restatement section of Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements as to which the date is June 29, 2006



F-1



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2004 and 2003

(in
thousands of dollars)



|                                                                                               |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | -------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                               |  | Restated (Note 2) 2004 |          |   | Restated(Note 2)2003 |  
|ASSETS                                                                                         |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|Current assets:                                                                                |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                      |  | $                      | 31,466   |   |                      | $ | 2,414   |  
|Trade and other receivables, net of reserves of $81 and $94, respectively                      |  |                        | 2,578    |   |                      |   | 1,309   |  
|Inventories                                                                                    |  |                        | 4,831    |   |                      |   | 4,936   |  
|Prepaid rent                                                                                   |  |                        | 3,589    |   |                      |   | 2,534   |  
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                                      |  |                        | 4,358    |   |                      |   | 4,043   |  
|Refundable income taxes                                                                        |  |                        | 3,326    |   |                      |   |        |  
|Deferred income taxes (Note 10)                                                                |  |                        | 6,242    |   |                      |   | 6,286   |  
|                                                                                               |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|Total current assets                                                                           |  |                        | 56,390   |   |                      |   | 21,522  |  
|Property and equipment, net (Note 3)                                                           |  |                        | 213,489  |   |                      |   | 238,168 |  
|Franchise rights, net (Note 4)                                                                 |  |                        | 90,056   |   |                      |   | 93,289  |  
|Goodwill (Note 4)                                                                              |  |                        | 122,241  |   |                      |   | 122,241 |  
|Franchise agreements, at cost less accumulated amortization of $4,954 and $4,432, respectively |  |                        | 6,480    |   |                      |   | 6,959   |  
|Deferred income taxes (Note 10)                                                                |  |                        | 12,940   |   |                      |   | 6,430   |  
|Other assets                                                                                   |  |                        | 14,650   |   |                      |   | 10,445  |  
|                                                                                               |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|Total assets                                                                                   |  | $                      | 516,246  |   |                      | $ | 499,054 |  
|                                                                                               |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)                                                 |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|Current liabilities:                                                                           |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|Current portion of long-term debt (Note 7)                                                     |  | $                      | 2,611    |   |                      | $ | 14,005  |  
|Accounts payable                                                                               |  |                        | 17,581   |   |                      |   | 17,230  |  
|Accrued interest                                                                               |  |                        | 956      |   |                      |   | 1,549   |  
|Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits                                                    |  |                        | 24,940   |   |                      |   | 12,840  |  
|Accrued bonus to employees and director (Note 11)                                              |  |                        | 20,860   |   |                      |   |        |  
|Accrued income taxes payable                                                                   |  |                        |         |   |                      |   | 836     |  
|Other liabilities                                                                              |  |                        | 13,957   |   |                      |   | 14,897  |  
|                                                                                               |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|Total current liabilities                                                                      |  |                        | 80,905   |   |                      |   | 61,357  |  
|Long-term debt, net of current portion (Note 7)                                                |  |                        | 398,614  |   |                      |   | 281,827 |  
|Lease financing obligations (Note 8)                                                           |  |                        | 111,715  |   |                      |   | 106,808 |  
|Deferred incomesale-leaseback of real estate (Note 6)                                         |  |                        | 8,585    |   |                      |   | 6,652   |  
|Accrued postretirement benefits (Note 16)                                                      |  |                        | 3,504    |   |                      |   | 2,962   |  
|Other liabilities (Note 5)                                                                     |  |                        | 28,452   |   |                      |   | 30,099  |  
|                                                                                               |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|Total liabilities                                                                              |  |                        | 631,775  |   |                      |   | 489,705 |  
|                                                                                               |  |                       
|Commitments and contingencies (Notes 6 and 14)                                                 |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|                                                                                               |  |                       
|Stockholders equity (deficit) (Notes 11 and 12):                                              |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|Common stock, par value $1; authorized 1,000 shares, issued and outstanding  10 shares        |  |                        |         |   |                      |   |        |  
|Additional paid-in capital                                                                     |  |                        | (92,309  | ) |                      |   | 24,485  |  
|Accumulated deficit                                                                            |  |                        | (23,220  | ) |                      |   | (15,136 | )
|                                                                                               |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|Total stockholders equity (deficit)                                                           |  |                        | (115,529 | ) |                      |   | 9,349   |  
|                                                                                               |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit)                                           |  | $                      | 516,246  |   |                      | $ | 499,054 |  
|                                                                                               |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-2



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                                                                                                           |  |                        |         |   |                      |   |                      |  |   |        
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | ------- | - | -------------------- | - | -------------------- |  | - | -------
|                                                                                                                           |  | Restated (Note 2) 2004 |         |   | Restated(Note 2)2003 |   | Restated(Note 2)2002
|Revenues:                                                                                                                  |  |                        |         |   |                      |   |                      |  |   |        
|Restaurant sales                                                                                                           |  | $                      | 696,343 |   |                      | $ | 643,579              |  | $ | 655,545
|Franchise royalty revenues and fees                                                                                        |  |                        | 1,536   |   |                      |   | 1,406                |  |   | 1,482  
|                                                                                                                           |  |                        |         |   |                      |   |                      |  |   |        
|Total revenues                                                                                                             |  |                        | 697,879 |   |                      |   | 644,985              |  |   | 657,027
|                                                                                                                           |  |                        |         |   |                      |   |                      |  |   |        
|Costs and expenses:                                                                                                        |  |                        |         |   |                      |   |                      |  |   |        
|Cost of sales                                                                                                              |  |                        | 202,624 |   |                      |   | 181,182              |  |   | 183,976
|Restaurant wages and related expenses                                                                                      |  |                        | 206,732 |   |                      |   | 194,315              |  |   | 196,258
|Restaurant rent expense                                                                                                    |  |                        | 34,606  |   |                      |   | 31,089               |  |   | 30,940 
|Other restaurant operating expenses                                                                                        |  |                        | 92,891  |   |                      |   | 89,880               |  |   | 87,335 
|Advertising expense                                                                                                        |  |                        | 24,711  |   |                      |   | 27,351               |  |   | 28,041 
|General and administrative (including stock-based compensation expense (income) of $1,818, $253, and $(151), respectively) |  |                        | 43,578  |   |                      |   | 37,376               |  |   | 36,459 
|Depreciation and amortization                                                                                              |  |                        | 38,521  |   |                      |   | 40,228               |  |   | 39,434 
|Impairment losses (Note 3)                                                                                                 |  |                        | 1,544   |   |                      |   | 4,151                |  |   | 1,285  
|Bonus to employees and director (Note 11)                                                                                  |  |                        | 20,860  |   |                      |   |                     |  |   |       
|Other expense (Note 9)                                                                                                     |  |                        | 2,320   |   |                      |   |                     |  |   |       
|                                                                                                                           |  |                        |         |   |                      |   |                      |  |   |        
|Total operating expenses                                                                                                   |  |                        | 668,387 |   |                      |   | 605,572              |  |   | 603,728
|                                                                                                                           |  |                        |         |   |                      |   |                      |  |   |        
|Income from operations                                                                                                     |  |                        | 29,492  |   |                      |   | 39,413               |  |   | 53,299 
|Interest expense                                                                                                           |  |                        | 35,383  |   |                      |   | 37,334               |  |   | 39,329 
|Loss on extinguishment of debt (Note 7)                                                                                    |  |                        | 8,913   |   |                      |   |                     |  |   |       
|                                                                                                                           |  |                        |         |   |                      |   |                      |  |   |        
|Income (loss) before income taxes                                                                                          |  |                        | (14,804 | ) |                      |   | 2,079                |  |   | 13,970 
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes (Note 10)                                                                             |  |                        | (6,720  | ) |                      |   | 741                  |  |   | 4,929  
|                                                                                                                           |  |                        |         |   |                      |   |                      |  |   |        
|Net income (loss)                                                                                                          |  | $                      | (8,084  | ) |                      | $ | 1,338                |  | $ | 9,041  
|                                                                                                                           |  |                        |         |   |                      |   |                      |  |   |        

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-3



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(DEFICIT)

Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                                     |  |             |   |                           |   |          |                    |  |   |                                    |   |  |   |          |  
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- | - | ------------------------- | - | -------- | ------------------ |  | - | ---------------------------------- | - |  | - | -------- | -
|                                                     |  | CommonStock |   | AdditionalPaid-In-Capital |   |          | AccumulatedDeficit |  |   | TotalStockholdersEquity (Deficit) |  
|Balance at December 31, 2001, as previously reported |  | $           |  |                           | $ | 24,485   |                    |  | $ | (15,597                            | ) |  | $ | 8,888    |  
|Restatement adjustments (Note 2)                     |  |             |  |                           |   |         |                    |  |   | (9,918                             | ) |  |   | (9,918   | )
|                                                     |  |             |   |                           |   |          |                    |  |   |                                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Balance at December 31, 2001, restated (Note 2)      |  |             |  |                           |   | 24,485   |                    |  |   | (25,515                            | ) |  |   | (1,030   | )
|Net income (restated)                                |  |             |  |                           |   |         |                    |  |   | 9,041                              |   |  |   | 9,041    |  
|                                                     |  |             |   |                           |   |          |                    |  |   |                                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Balance at December 31, 2002, restated (Note 2)      |  |             |  |                           |   | 24,485   |                    |  |   | (16,474                            | ) |  |   | 8,011    |  
|Net income (restated)                                |  |             |  |                           |   |         |                    |  |   | 1,338                              |   |  |   | 1,338    |  
|                                                     |  |             |   |                           |   |          |                    |  |   |                                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Balance at December 31, 2003, restated (Note 2)      |  |             |  |                           |   | 24,485   |                    |  |   | (15,136                            | ) |  |   | 9,349    |  
|Net loss (restated)                                  |  |             |  |                           |   |         |                    |  |   | (8,084                             | ) |  |   | (8,084   | )
|Dividends declared (Note 11)                         |  |             |  |                           |   | (116,794 | )                  |  |   |                                   |   |  |   | (116,794 | )
|                                                     |  |             |   |                           |   |          |                    |  |   |                                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Balance at December 31, 2004, restated (Note 2)      |  | $           |  |                           | $ | (92,309  | )                  |  | $ | (23,220                            | ) |  | $ | (115,529 | )
|                                                     |  |             |   |                           |   |          |                    |  |   |                                    |   |  |   |          |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-4



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                                                                           |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------- | -------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------- | -------------------- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                           |  | Restated (Note 2) 2004 |          |   | Restated(Note 2)2003 |   |         | Restated(Note 2)2002 | 
|Cash flows provided from operating activities:                                             |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Net income (loss)                                                                          |  | $                      | (8,084   | ) |                      | $ | 1,338   |                      |  | $ | 9,041   |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided from operating activities: |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|(Gain)/loss on disposal of property and equipment                                          |  |                        | (176     | ) |                      |   | (386    | )                    |  |   | 24      |  
|Stock-based compensation                                                                   |  |                        | 1,818    |   |                      |   | 253     |                      |  |   | (151    | )
|Depreciation and amortization                                                              |  |                        | 38,521   |   |                      |   | 40,228  |                      |  |   | 39,434  |  
|Amortization of deferred financing costs                                                   |  |                        | 1,527    |   |                      |   | 1,540   |                      |  |   | 1,528   |  
|Amortization of unearned purchase discounts                                                |  |                        | (2,154   | ) |                      |   | (2,146  | )                    |  |   | (2,155  | )
|Amortization of deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions                            |  |                        | (458     | ) |                      |   | (180    | )                    |  |   | (21     | )
|Accretion of interest on lease financing obligations                                       |  |                        | 406      |   |                      |   | 443     |                      |  |   | 478     |  
|Impairment losses                                                                          |  |                        | 1,544    |   |                      |   | 4,151   |                      |  |   | 1,285   |  
|Loss on extinguishment of debt                                                             |  |                        | 8,913    |   |                      |   |        |                      |  |   |        |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                                      |  |                        | (6,466   | ) |                      |   | (1,156  | )                    |  |   | 4,888   |  
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                                               |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Income taxes                                                                               |  |                        | (4,162   | ) |                      |   | 2,089   |                      |  |   | 153     |  
|Accounts payable                                                                           |  |                        | (2,427   | ) |                      |   | 1,258   |                      |  |   | (521    | )
|Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits                                                |  |                        | 9,666    |   |                      |   | (3,585  | )                    |  |   | 2,143   |  
|Accrued bonus to employees and director                                                    |  |                        | 20,860   |   |                      |   |        |                      |  |   |        |  
|Other liabilities  current                                                                |  |                        | 1,762    |   |                      |   | 381     |                      |  |   | (450    | )
|Accrued interest                                                                           |  |                        | (593     | ) |                      |   | 134     |                      |  |   | (103    | )
|Other liabilities  long-term                                                              |  |                        | (428     | ) |                      |   | 475     |                      |  |   | (1,223  | )
|Other                                                                                      |  |                        | (858     | ) |                      |   | 1,512   |                      |  |   | (156    | )
|                                                                                           |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Net cash provided from operating activities                                                |  |                        | 59,211   |   |                      |   | 46,349  |                      |  |   | 54,194  |  
|                                                                                           |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Cash flows (used for) provided from investing activities:                                  |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Capital expenditures:                                                                      |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|New restaurant development                                                                 |  |                        | (10,408  | ) |                      |   | (18,706 | )                    |  |   | (27,465 | )
|Lessor reimbursement                                                                       |  |                        | 754      |   |                      |   |        |                      |  |   |        |  
|                                                                                           |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Net new restaurant development                                                             |  |                        | (9,654   | ) |                      |   | (18,706 | )                    |  |   | (27,465 | )
|Restaurant remodeling                                                                      |  |                        | (845     | ) |                      |   | (3,317  | )                    |  |   | (16,254 | )
|Other restaurant expenditures                                                              |  |                        | (7,503   | ) |                      |   | (6,944  | )                    |  |   | (9,018  | )
|Corporate and restaurant information systems                                               |  |                        | (1,071   | ) |                      |   | (1,404  | )                    |  |   | (1,418  | )
|                                                                                           |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Net capital expenditures                                                                   |  |                        | (19,073  | ) |                      |   | (30,371 | )                    |  |   | (54,155 | )
|Properties purchased for sale-leaseback                                                    |  |                        | (1,574   | ) |                      |   | (3,149  | )                    |  |   | (925    | )
|Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions                                                  |  |                        | 10,984   |   |                      |   | 44,180  |                      |  |   | 8,435   |  
|Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment                                       |  |                        | 1,174    |   |                      |   | 3,921   |                      |  |   | 9       |  
|                                                                                           |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Net cash (used for) provided from investing activities                                     |  |                        | (8,489   | ) |                      |   | 14,581  |                      |  |   | (46,636 | )
|                                                                                           |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Cash flows used for financing activities:                                                  |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Payments on revolving credit facility, net                                                 |  |                        | (600     | ) |                      |   | (52,200 | )                    |  |   | (2,700  | )
|Scheduled principal payments on term loans                                                 |  |                        | (10,125  | ) |                      |   | (11,000 | )                    |  |   | (8,500  | )
|Proceeds from issuance of debt                                                             |  |                        | 400,000  |   |                      |   |        |                      |  |   |        |  
|Tender and redemption of 91/2% senior subordinated notes                                   |  |                        | (175,756 | ) |                      |   |        |                      |  |   |        |  
|Repayment of borrowings under previous credit facility                                     |  |                        | (113,375 | ) |                      |   |        |                      |  |   |        |  
|Financing costs associated with issuance of debt and lease financing obligations           |  |                        | (9,013   | ) |                      |   | (186    | )                    |  |   | (296    | )
|Proceeds from lease financing obligations                                                  |  |                        | 4,500    |   |                      |   | 3,625   |                      |  |   | 5,600   |  
|Dividends paid                                                                             |  |                        | (116,794 | ) |                      |   |        |                      |  |   |        |  
|Payments on other notes payable, net                                                       |  |                        | (117     | ) |                      |   | (847    | )                    |  |   | (978    | )
|Principal payments on capital leases                                                       |  |                        | (390     | ) |                      |   | (446    | )                    |  |   | (551    | )
|                                                                                           |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Net cash used for financing activities                                                     |  |                        | (21,670  | ) |                      |   | (61,054 | )                    |  |   | (7,425  | )
|                                                                                           |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                                       |  |                        | 29,052   |   |                      |   | (124    | )                    |  |   | 133     |  
|Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year                                               |  |                        | 2,414    |   |                      |   | 2,538   |                      |  |   | 2,405   |  
|                                                                                           |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                                                     |  | $                      | 31,466   |   |                      | $ | 2,414   |                      |  | $ | 2,538   |  
|                                                                                           |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Supplemental disclosures:                                                                  |  |                        |          |   |                      |   |         |                      |  |   |         |  
|Interest paid on long-term debt and financing obligations                                  |  | $                      | 33,994   |   |                      | $ | 35,222  |                      |  | $ | 37,425  |  
|Income taxes paid (refunded), net                                                          |  | $                      | 3,905    |   |                      | $ | (195    | )                    |  | $ | 1,494   |  
|Increase (decrease) in accruals for capital expenditures                                   |  | $                      | 1,153    |   |                      | $ | (127    | )                    |  | $ |        |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-5



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Carrols Corporation and its subsidiaries (the
Company). All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Carrols Holdings Corporation (Holdings).

Business Description.At December 31, 2004, the Company operated, as franchisee, 348 quick-service restaurants under the trade name
Burger King in thirteen Northeastern, Midwestern and Southeastern states. At December 31, 2004, the Company also owned and operated 63 Pollo Tropical restaurants located in Florida and franchised 24 Pollo Tropical restaurants in
Puerto Rico, Ecuador and Florida. At December 31, 2004, the Company owned and operated 126 Taco Cabana restaurants located primarily in Texas and franchised seven restaurants in Texas, New Mexico and Georgia.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements. Estimates also
affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include: accrued occupancy costs, insurance liabilities, legal obligations, income taxes, evaluation of
goodwill, impairment of long-lived assets and impairment of Burger King franchise rights. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fiscal Year. The Company uses a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31. All references herein to fiscal years ended December 29, 2002, December 28, 2003 and January 2, 2005 will be
referred to as fiscal years December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Our fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 contained 53 weeks. Our fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 each contained 52 weeks.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to
be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2004 the Company had $28.0 million invested in money market funds.

Inventories.Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Inventories are primarily comprised of food and paper.

Property and Equipment. The Company capitalizes all direct costs incurred to construct and substantially improve its restaurants. These costs are depreciated and charged to expense based upon their property classification when placed
in service. Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Repair and maintenance activities are expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:



|                               |  |                                     
|------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Owned buildings                |  | 5 to 30 years                       
|Equipment                      |  | 3 to 15 years                       
|Computer hardware and software |  | 3 to 7 years                        
|Capital leases                 |  | Shorter of useful life or lease term

Leasehold improvements are being depreciated over the shorter of their useful lives or the
underlying lease term. In circumstances where an economic penalty, as defined under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for Leases (SFAS 13), would be presumed by not exercising one or more
renewal options under the lease, the Company includes those renewal option periods when determining the lease term. For significant leasehold improvements made during the latter part of the lease term, the Company amortizes those improvements over
the shorter of their useful life or an extended lease term. The extended lease term would consider the exercise of renewal options if the value of the improvements would cause a penalty to be incurred without the renewal of the option. Costs
incurred for new restaurants on leased land are depreciated over the lease term, which is generally a 20-year period.



F-6



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



Burger King Franchise Rights.For its Burger King restaurant acquisitions prior to
January 1, 2002, the Company has generally allocated to franchise rights, an intangible asset, the excess of purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The Company made an
assessment of remaining life of its intangible assets as part of its implementation of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, (SFAS 142). As of January 1, 2002, amounts allocated to franchise rights for
each acquisition are amortized using the straight-line method over the average remaining term of the acquired franchise agreements at January 1, 2002 plus one twenty year renewal period. The average remaining life of all franchise rights at
January 1, 2002 was approximately 31 years.

Burger King Franchise Agreements.Fees for initial franchises and renewals are
amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the agreement, which is generally twenty years.

Goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangibles. Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired. In accordance with SFAS 142 goodwill and intangible assets
with indefinite lives are no longer amortized, effective January 1, 2002, but are tested at least annually for impairment. The Company performs its impairment evaluation annually at December 31.

Long-Lived Assets.The Company assesses the recoverability of property and equipment and franchise rights by determining whether the carrying
value of these assets, over their respective remaining lives, can be recovered through undiscounted future operating cash flows. Impairment is reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts of these assets may not
be fully recoverable.

Deferred Financing Costs.Financing costs, that are included in other assets and were incurred in obtaining
long-term debt and financing obligations, are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related obligation as interest expense on a straight-line basis which approximates the effective interest method.

Leases. Leases are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 13 and other related authoritative guidance. Rent expense for leases that
contain scheduled rent increases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including any option period included in the determination of the lease term. Contingent rentals are generally based upon a percentage of sales or a
percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts and are generally not considered minimum rent payments but are recognized as rent expense when incurred.

Franchise Fees associated with Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants. Franchise fees are typically collected upon execution of an area development and/or franchise agreement. Franchise fees are initially
recorded as deferred revenue and are recognized in earnings when the franchised restaurants are opened, or upon forfeiture of such fees by the franchisees pursuant to the terms of the franchise development agreements.

Revenue Recognition. Revenues from Company owned and operated restaurants are recognized when payment is tendered at the time of sale. Franchise
royalty revenues associated with Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana restaurants are based on a percent of gross sales and are recorded as income when earned.

Income Taxes. The Company provides for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). Under the liability method specified
by SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities as measured by the tax rates that are anticipated to be in effect when these differences reverse.
The deferred tax provision generally represents the net change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes
the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when it is necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts for which realization is more likely than not. The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return with
Holdings.

Advertising Costs. All advertising costs are expensed as incurred.

Cost of Sales. The Company includes the cost of food, beverage and paper, less purchase discounts, in cost of sales.

Self Insurance. The Company is generally self-insured for workers compensation, general liability and medical insurance. The Company maintains
stop loss coverage for both individual and aggregate claim amounts. Losses are accrued based upon the Companys estimates of the aggregate liability for claims based on Company experience and certain actuarial methods used to measure such
estimates. The Company does not discount any of its self-insurance obligations.



F-7



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The following methods were used to estimate the fair
value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate the fair value:



| |  |  | Current Assets and Liabilities. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents and accrued liabilities approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those
instruments.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Senior Subordinated Notes. The fair values of outstanding senior subordinated notes are based on quoted market prices. The fair values at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were
approximately $186.3 million and $174.5 million, respectively.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Revolving and Term Loan Facilities. Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value. The
recorded amounts, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, approximated fair value.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stock-Based Compensation. At
December 31, 2004, the Company had four stock-based compensation plans. All outstanding stock option awards were cancelled and terminated effective May 3, 2005 in exchange for the issuance of an identical number of shares of common stock.
See Note 12  Stockholders Equity, Subsequent Event. SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (SFAS 123) permits entities to recognize as an expense over the vesting period the fair value of all
stock-based awards on the date of grant. Alternatively, SFAS 123 allows entities to continue to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, (APB 25) and
provide pro forma net income disclosures for employee stock option grants as if the fair-value-based method defined in SFAS 123 has been applied. The Company has not elected to change to the fair value-based-method of accounting for stock-based
compensation and will continue applying the provisions of APB 25 and provide the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123.

The
following table presents the Companys pro forma net income had compensation cost been determined based upon the fair value of the stock options at the grant date consistent with the fair-value based method of SFAS 123:



|                                                                                                                                                    |  |                         |        |   |                      |   |       |                      |  |   |        |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------ | - | -------------------- | - | ----- | -------------------- |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                                                                                                                    |  | Year Ended December 31, |       
|                                                                                                                                                    |  | Restated (Note 2) 2004  |        |   | Restated(Note 2)2003 |   |       | Restated(Note 2)2002 | 
|Net income (loss) - as reported                                                                                                                     |  | $                       | (8,084 | ) |                      | $ | 1,338 |                      |  | $ | 9,041  |  
|Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense/(income) included in reported net income (loss), net of related tax effects
(1)(2)                   |  |                         | 13,279 |   |                      |   | 152   |                      |  |   | (91    | )
|Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax
effects (2) |  |                         | (5,656 | ) |                      |   | (257  | )                    |  |   | (1,135 | )
|                                                                                                                                                    |  |                         |        |   |                      |   |       |                      |  |   |        |  
|Pro forma net income (loss)                                                                                                                         |  | $                       | (461   | ) |                      | $ | 1,233 |                      |  | $ | 7,815  |  
|                                                                                                                                                    |  |                         |        |   |                      |   |       |                      |  |   |        |  

---

|(1) | Amount includes compensation expense/(income) for certain stock options requiring variable accounting (see Note 12).
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | As a result of the December 2004 refinancing (See Note 7) in which a non-recurring dividend of $116.8 million was paid to Holdings, the equity value of the Company was reduced. In
conjunction with the December 2004 refinancing, the Company also approved a compensatory bonus payment of approximately $20.3 million to a number of employees (including management) and a director who owned options to purchase common stock on a pro
rata basis in proportion to the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options owned by such persons. The Company did not modify its outstanding stock options to reflect the reduction in equity value. Therefore, this reduction
has been offset against the $20.3 million bonus payment recorded for the determination of SFAS 123 compensation expense. The $20.3 million bonus payment, net of tax, has also been included in stock-based employee compensation expense included in
reported net loss in the above table.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-8



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



The fair value of each option grant was estimated using the minimum value option-pricing model with
the following weighted-average assumptions:



|                        |  |         |   |  |         |   |  |         |  
|----------------------- |  | ------- | - |  | ------- | - |  | ------- | -
|                        |  | 2004    |   |  | 2003    |   |  | 2002    |  
|Risk-free interest rate |  | 3.38    | % |  | 3.17    | % |  | 4.40    | %
|Annual dividend yield   |  | 0       | % |  | 0       | % |  | 0       | %
|Expected life           |  | 5 years |   |  | 5 years |   |  | 5 years |  

Recent Accounting Developments.In December 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation
No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities and Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46R). This interpretation replaces FIN 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. FIN 46R clarifies the
application of the majority voting interest requirement of ARB No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not
have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46R was effective in 2004 for the Company. The Company reviewed the provisions of FIN 46R in 2004 and
determined that it did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

On October 22, 2004, President Bush
signed into law the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (H.R. 4520) (the Act). The impact of the Act on the Companys tax provision and deferred taxes was immaterial.

In September 2004, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Topic D-108, Use of the Residual Method to Value Acquired Assets
Other than Goodwill, which requires companies, that have applied the residual method to value intangible assets, to perform an impairment test on those intangible assets by the end of the first quarter of 2005. The Company does not expect the
provisions of EITF Topic D-108 to materially effect its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) which replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB No. 25. SFAS 123R requires the measurement of all
employee share-based payments, including grants of employee stock options, using a fair-value-based method and the recording of such expense in the consolidated statements of operations. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123
no longer will be an alternative to financial statement recognition. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 Share-Based Payment, SAB No. 107 expresses views of the SEC staff regarding
the interaction between SFAS 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides the staffs views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements. SFAS 123R is effective for awards that are granted, modified, or settled in cash
for the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these pronouncements on its financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets (SFAS 153). This Statement amends the
guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions (APB 29). APB 29 provided an exception to the basic measurement principle (fair value) for exchanges of similar assets, requiring that some
nonmonetary exchanges be recorded on a carryover basis. SFAS 153 eliminates the exception to fair value for exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchange transactions that do not have commercial
substance, that is, transactions that are not expected to result in significant changes in the cash flows of the reporting entity. The provisions of SFAS 153 are effective for exchanges of nonmonetary assets occurring in fiscal periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 153 on its financial statements.

In March 2005, the FASB
issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that the term conditional as used in SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations, which refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity even if the timing and/or settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of an entity. Accordingly, the
entity must record a liability for the conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 is effective for periods no later than fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of FIN 47 on its financial statements.



F-9



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



On June 30, 2005, tax legislation in the state of Ohio was enacted that will significantly
restructure the tax system for most corporate taxpayers. Included in the legislation is a multi-year phase-out of the state franchise tax and tangible personal property tax. These taxes will be replaced with a Commercial Activity Tax that will be
phased-in over a five-year period. The Company is evaluating the impact of this legislation and will record any impact therefrom in the second quarter of 2005.

2. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

Current Restatement

Lease Financing Obligations

The Company reviewed its
accounting with respect to the depreciation of assets and recording of interest expense associated with lease financing obligations related to sale-leaseback transactions required to be accounted for under the financing method. Under the financing
method, the assets subject to these obligations remain on the consolidated balance sheet at their historical costs and continue to be depreciated over their useful lives; the proceeds the Company received from the transaction are recorded as a lease
financing obligation and the lease payments are applied as payments of principal and/or interest.

The Company previously considered the
land and building as a single asset and depreciated this asset (both land and building) over a depreciable life that was deemed to be the 20-year primary lease term of the underlying obligation. The Company has concluded that its prior
accounting was in error and that the portion of the asset representing land should not be depreciated and the depreciation of the building portion of this asset should continue using its original estimated useful life rather than the term of the
underlying obligation. The effect of this restatement resulted in a reduction of depreciation expense of $2.0 million in each of the years December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and an increase to net income of $1.2 million, $1.2 million and $1.4
million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Historically, the Company allocated the related lease payments between interest and principal
using an interest rate that would fully amortize the lease financing obligation by the end of the primary lease term. Due to the change in depreciation described above, the assets subject to the lease financing obligations will have a net book value
at the end of the primary lease term, primarily for the land portion. To prevent the recognition of a non-cash loss or negative amortization of the obligation through the end of the primary lease term, it was necessary to reevaluate the
selection of interest rates, which included the Companys incremental borrowing rate, and to adjust the rates used to amortize the lease financing obligations so that a lease obligation equal to or greater than the unamortized asset remained at
the end of the primary lease term. The effect of this restatement resulted in an increase in interest expense and decrease in net income related to the lease financing obligations of $2.7 million and $1.7 million in 2004, $2.5 million and $1.5
million in 2003 and $2.3 million and $1.1 million in 2002, respectively.

These restatements also resulted in an increase in land and
buildings subject to lease financing obligations of $11.4 million and an increase in lease financing obligations of $14.6 million at December 31, 2004.

The Company also reviewed previously reported sale-leaseback transactions and determined twelve additional real estate transactions were required to be recorded as financing transactions under SFAS No. 98
Accounting for Leases due to certain forms of continuing involvement. The impact of this restatement is to keep the assets subject to such leases on the Companys balance sheet and to record the proceeds the Company received from
these transactions (including the gains previously deferred) as lease financing obligations. This restatement also affects our operating results by increasing the depreciation expense for buildings subject to these transactions and recharacterizing
the lease payments, previously reported as rent expense for these restaurants, as interest expense and principal repayments on the related financing obligations.

The effect of this restatement (a) for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was to (i) reduce rent expense by $1.1 million, $0.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively; (ii) increase
depreciation expense by $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively; (iii) increase interest expense by $1.3 million, $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively; and (iv) reduce net income by $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.1
million, respectively; and (b) at December 31, 2004 and 2003 to (i) increase the net book value of the land and buildings subject to lease financing obligations by $9.5 million and $6.6 million, respectively, (ii) reduce deferred
income-sale/leaseback of real estate by $3.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and increase lease financing obligations by $14.7 million and $10.2 million, respectively.

The net effect of the above current restatements was to decrease net income $0.9 million, $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December
31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.



F-10



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



Deferred Taxes

The Company also reviewed deferred taxes recorded for certain long-lived assets and liabilities that were previously acquired in business combinations and the related differences between the income tax bases and the
financial reporting bases of these assets and liabilities and determined that the deferred taxes recorded at the acquisition dates were incorrect. The result of these restatements was to decrease goodwill and deferred tax liabilities by $2.1 million
in the aggregate related to our 2000 acquisition of Taco Cabana and to increase goodwill and deferred tax liabilities by $0.6 million related to our 1998 acquisition of Pollo Tropical. This restatement also cumulatively decreased goodwill
amortization expense by $0.1 million for periods prior to 2002.

Statements of Cash Flows

The Company has corrected it previously issued financial statements to reflect the proceeds from qualifying sale-leaseback transactions within investing
activities rather than as financing activities as previously reported in the statements of cash flows. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 proceeds from qualifying sale-leaseback transactions included in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements were $11.0 million, $44.2 million and $8.4 million, respectively. The Company has also restated its consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 to reflect the
impact of changes in accounts payable related to the acquisition of property and equipment as a non-cash item as required under SFAS No. 95.

Previous Restatement

Lease and Leasehold Improvement Accounting

The Company reviewed its lease accounting policies following a host of announcements by many restaurant and retail companies that they were revising their
accounting practices for leases. The Company historically followed the accounting practice of using the initial lease term when determining operating versus capital lease classification and when calculating straight-line rent expense. In addition,
the Company depreciated its buildings on leased land and leasehold improvements over a period that included both the initial lease term plus one or more optional extension periods even if the option renewal was not reasonably assured (or the useful
life of the asset if shorter).

Upon such review, the Company restated its financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003
and 2002 and the unaudited quarterly financial information for 2003 and the first three quarters of 2004 to correct errors in its lease accounting. Specifically, the Company revised its lease term for purposes of lease classification and calculating
straight-line rent expense to only include renewal options that are reasonably assured of exercise because an economic penalty, as defined under SFAS 13 would be incurred in the event of non-renewal. The Company also revised its useful lives of
leasehold improvements to the shorter of their economic lives or the lease term as defined in SFAS 13. The primary impact of the original restatement was to accelerate depreciation of buildings on leased land and leasehold improvements made
subsequent to the lease inception date. The original restatement also reduced the lives of intangible assets related to leases. The aggregate effect of these adjustments at December 31, 2004 was a reduction of the net book value of leasehold
improvements of $13.8 million and a reduction of the net book value of intangible assets related to leases of $3.8 million.

In conjunction
with the review of its lease accounting, the Company also determined that adjustments were necessary for lease liabilities for operating leases with non-level rents at the time of its acquisitions of Pollo Tropical in 1998 and Taco Cabana in 2000 as
well as liabilities related to acquired leases with above-market rentals for Taco Cabana. The Company has adjusted its purchase price allocations for these acquisitions and restated lease liabilities and goodwill as of the acquisition dates. The
Company has also restated rent expense and interest expense for those previously reported periods subsequent to each acquisition and restated goodwill amortization through December 31, 2001.

As a result of these original restatements rent expense increased $0.1 million in the first nine months of 2004, $0.3 million in 2003 and $0.7 million in
2002.

Accounting for Franchise Rights

During the current year, the Company also reviewed its accounting policies for the amortization of franchise rights, intangible assets pertaining to the acquisitions of Burger King restaurants, and determined that it made an error in the
assessment of their remaining useful lives as part of its adoption of SFAS 142. As of January 1, 2002, amounts allocated to franchise rights for each acquisition are now amortized prospectively from that date using the straight-line method over
the average remaining term of the acquired franchise agreements at January 1, 2002, plus one twenty-year renewal period. Previously, the Company amortized the amounts allocated to franchise rights over periods ranging from twenty to forty
years.



F-11



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



In connection with the review of its accounting for franchise rights, the Company also determined
that it understated the franchise rights and deferred tax liabilities each by $14.0 million that pertained to an acquisition of 64 Burger King restaurants in 1997.

The Company has restated its financial statements for these adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the unaudited quarterly financial information for 2003 and the first three quarters of
2004. The effect of the original restatement was a reduction in amortization expense of $0.5 million for the first three quarters of 2004 and $0.8 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

Stock-based Compensation Expense

The Company
reevaluated the terms of its option plans and grants and concluded that provisions of certain options granted under its plans require the Company to account for these options using the variable accounting provisions of APB 25. Previously, the
Company had accounted for these options under APB 25 using a fixed accounting treatment whereby compensation expense, if any, was only evaluated at the date of the option grant. The impact of this adjustment was to increase stock-based compensation
expense, included in general and administrative expenses, by $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and $253 for the year ended December 31, 2003 and to decrease stock-based compensation expense by $151 for the year ended
December 31, 2002.

Accounting for Guarantor Financial Statements

The Company has restated its financial statements to correct the disclosure related to the Company and its subsidiaries who guarantee certain of the Companys securities as of December 31, 2003 and for the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 to reflect the allocation of corporate costs to conform to the current year presentation and in addition, for the year ended December 31, 2003, the calculation of income tax expense applicable to the
Guarantor Subsidiaries. See Note 17.

The following table sets forth the previously reported amounts and the previously and currently
restated amounts reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements:



|                                                |  |                      |          |   |             |   |          |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | -------- | - | ----------- | - | -------- | -
|                                                |  | 2004                 |         
|                                                |  | AsPreviouslyReported |          |   | As Restated |  
|Consolidated Balance Sheet:                     |  |                      |          |   |             |   |          |  
|Property and equipment, net                     |  | $                    | 192,530  |   |             | $ | 213,489  |  
|Goodwill                                        |  |                      | 123,724  |   |             |   | 122,241  |  
|Deferred income taxes  long-term               |  |                      | 9,307    |   |             |   | 12,940   |  
|Other assets                                    |  |                      | 14,585   |   |             |   | 14,650   |  
|Total assets                                    |  |                      | 493,072  |   |             |   | 516,246  |  
|Current portion of lease financing obligations  |  |                      | 2,595    |   |             |   |         |  
|Total current liabilities                       |  |                      | 83,500   |   |             |   | 80,905   |  
|Lease financing obligations                     |  |                      | 79,802   |   |             |   | 111,715  |  
|Deferred income  sale-leaseback of real estate |  |                      | 11,584   |   |             |   | 8,585    |  
|Total liabilities                               |  |                      | 605,456  |   |             |   | 631,775  |  
|Accumulated deficit                             |  |                      | (20,075  | ) |             |   | (23,220  | )
|Total stockholders deficit                     |  |                      | (112,384 | ) |             |   | (115,529 | )
|Total liabilities and stockholders deficit     |  |                      | 493,072  |   |             |   | 516,246  |  



F-12



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                                |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |                     |  |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------- | ------------------- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                |  | 2003                 |        
|                                                |  | AsPreviouslyReported |         |   | AsPreviouslyRestated |   |         | AsCurrentlyRestated | 
|Consolidated Balance Sheet:                     |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |                     |  |   |         |  
|Property and equipment, net                     |  | $                    | 235,530 |   |                      | $ | 222,169 |                     |  | $ | 238,168 |  
|Franchise rights, net                           |  |                      | 79,189  |   |                      |   | 93,289  |                     |  |   | 93,289  |  
|Goodwill                                        |  |                      | 123,861 |   |                      |   | 123,724 |                     |  |   | 122,241 |  
|Deferred income taxes  long-term               |  |                      | 8,619   |   |                      |   | 3,228   |                     |  |   | 6,430   |  
|Other assets                                    |  |                      | 10,400  |   |                      |   | 10,495  |                     |  |   | 10,445  |  
|Total assets                                    |  |                      | 486,080 |   |                      |   | 481,386 |                     |  |   | 499,054 |  
|Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits     |  |                      | 11,574  |   |                      |   | 12,840  |                     |  |   | 12,840  |  
|Current portion of lease financing obligations  |  |                      | 2,288   |   |                      |   | 2,288   |                     |  |   |        |  
|Total current liabilities                       |  |                      | 62,379  |   |                      |   | 63,645  |                     |  |   | 61,357  |  
|Lease financing obligations                     |  |                      | 82,397  |   |                      |   | 82,397  |                     |  |   | 106,808 |  
|Deferred income  sale-leaseback of real estate |  |                      | 8,841   |   |                      |   | 8,841   |                     |  |   | 6,652   |  
|Other liabilities                               |  |                      | 26,704  |   |                      |   | 30,099  |                     |  |   | 30,099  |  
|Total liabilities                               |  |                      | 465,110 |   |                      |   | 469,771 |                     |  |   | 489,705 |  
|Accumulated deficit                             |  |                      | (3,515  | ) |                      |   | (12,870 | )                   |  |   | (15,136 | )
|Total stockholders equity                      |  |                      | 20,970  |   |                      |   | 11,615  |                     |  |   | 9,349   |  
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity      |  |                      | 486,080 |   |                      |   | 481,386 |                     |  |   | 499,054 |  



|                                                                                 |  |                      |         |   |            |   |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------- | - | ---------- | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                 |  | December 31, 2004    |        
|                                                                                 |  | AsPreviouslyReported |         |   | AsRestated |  
|Consolidated Statements of Operations:                                           |  |                      |         |   |            |   |         |  
|Restaurant rent expense                                                          |  | $                    | 35,699  |   |            | $ | 34,606  |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                    |  |                      | 40,180  |   |            |   | 38,521  |  
|Total operating expenses                                                         |  |                      | 671,139 |   |            |   | 668,387 |  
|Income from operations                                                           |  |                      | 26,740  |   |            |   | 29,492  |  
|Interest expense                                                                 |  |                      | 31,320  |   |            |   | 35,383  |  
|Loss before income taxes                                                         |  |                      | (13,493 | ) |            |   | (14,804 | )
|Benefit for income taxes                                                         |  |                      | (6,288  | ) |            |   | (6,720  | )
|Net loss                                                                         |  |                      | (7,205  | ) |            |   | (8,084  | )
|                                                                                 |  |                     
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:                                           |  |                      |         |   |            |   |         |  
|Net loss                                                                         |  | $                    | (7,205  | ) |            | $ | (8,084  | )
|Depreciation and amortization                                                    |  |                      | 40,180  |   |            |   | 38,521  |  
|Amortization of deferred financing costs                                         |  |                      | 1,419   |   |            |   | 1,527   |  
|Amortization of deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions                  |  |                      | (626    | ) |            |   | (458    | )
|Accretion of interest on lease financing obligations                             |  |                      |        |   |            |   | 406     |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                            |  |                      | (6,035  | ) |            |   | (6,466  | )
|Net cash provided from operating activities                                      |  |                      | 62,652  |   |            |   | 59,211  |  
|Net capital expenditures                                                         |  |                      | (20,226 | ) |            |   | (19,073 | )
|Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions                                        |  |                      | 15,263  |   |            |   | 10,984  |  
|Net cash used for investing activities                                           |  |                      | (20,626 | ) |            |   | (8,489  | )
|Principal payments on lease financing obligations                                |  |                      | (2,288  | ) |            |   |        |  
|Proceeds from lease financing obligations                                        |  |                      |        |   |            |   | 4,500   |  
|Financing costs associated with issuance of debt and lease financing obligations |  |                      | (8,792  | ) |            |   | (9,013  | )
|Net cash used for financing activities                                           |  |                      | (12,974 | ) |            |   | (21,670 | )



F-13



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                                                                 |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |                     |  |   |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------- | ------------------- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                 |  | December 31, 2003    |        
|                                                                                 |  | AsPreviouslyReported |         |   | AsPreviouslyRestated |   |         | AsCurrentlyRestated | 
|Consolidated Statements of Operations:                                           |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |                     |  |   |         |  
|Restaurant rent expense                                                          |  | $                    | 31,383  |   |                      | $ | 31,710  |                     |  | $ | 31,089  |  
|General and administrative expense                                               |  |                      | 37,123  |   |                      |   | 37,376  |                     |  |   | 37,376  |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                    |  |                      | 41,657  |   |                      |   | 42,008  |                     |  |   | 40,228  |  
|Total operating expenses                                                         |  |                      | 607,042 |   |                      |   | 607,973 |                     |  |   | 605,572 |  
|Income from operations                                                           |  |                      | 37,943  |   |                      |   | 37,012  |                     |  |   | 39,413  |  
|Interest expense                                                                 |  |                      | 33,808  |   |                      |   | 34,069  |                     |  |   | 37,334  |  
|Income before income taxes                                                       |  |                      | 4,135   |   |                      |   | 2,943   |                     |  |   | 2,079   |  
|Provision for income taxes                                                       |  |                      | 1,767   |   |                      |   | 1,124   |                     |  |   | 741     |  
|Net income                                                                       |  |                      | 2,368   |   |                      |   | 1,819   |                     |  |   | 1,338   |  
|                                                                                 |  |                      |        
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:                                           |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |                     |  |   |         |  
|Net income                                                                       |  | $                    | 2,368   |   |                      | $ | 1,819   |                     |  | $ | 1,338   |  
|Stock-based compensation                                                         |  |                      |        |   |                      |   | 253     |                     |  |   | 253     |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                    |  |                      | 41,657  |   |                      |   | 42,008  |                     |  |   | 40,228  |  
|Amortization of deferred financing costs                                         |  |                      | 1,445   |   |                      |   | 1,445   |                     |  |   | 1,540   |  
|Amortization of deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions                  |  |                      | (269    | ) |                      |   | (269    | )                   |  |   | (180    | )
|Accretion of interest on lease financing obligations                             |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                     |  |   | 443     |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                            |  |                      | (130    | ) |                      |   | (773    | )                   |  |   | (1,156  | )
|Other liabilities  long-term                                                    |  |                      | (2,259  | ) |                      |   | (3,817  | )                   |  |   | 475     |  
|Net cash provided from operating activities                                      |  |                      | 48,239  |   |                      |   | 48,239  |                     |  |   | 46,349  |  
|Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions                                        |  |                      | 47,619  |   |                      |   | 47,619  |                     |  |   | 44,180  |  
|Net capital expenditures                                                         |  |                      | (30,244 | ) |                      |   | (30,244 | )                   |  |   | (30,371 | )
|Net cash (used for) provided from investing activities                           |  |                      | (29,472 | ) |                      |   | (29,472 | )                   |  |   | 14,581  |  
|Financing costs associated with issuance of debt and lease financing obligations |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                     |  |   | (186    | )
|Proceeds from lease financing obligations                                        |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                     |  |   | 3,625   |  
|Principal payments on lease financing obligations                                |  |                      | (2,017  | ) |                      |   | (2,017  | )                   |  |   |        |  
|Net cash used for financing activities                                           |  |                      | (18,891 | ) |                      |   | (18,891 | )                   |  |   | (61,054 | )



|                                                                                 |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |                     |  |   |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------- | ------------------- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                 |  | December 31, 2002    |        
|                                                                                 |  | AsPreviouslyReported |         |   | AsPreviouslyRestated |   |         | AsCurrentlyRestated | 
|Consolidated Statements of Operations:                                           |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |                     |  |   |         |  
|Restaurant rent expense                                                          |  | $                    | 30,494  |   |                      | $ | 31,187  |                     |  | $ | 30,940  |  
|General and administrative expense                                               |  |                      | 36,610  |   |                      |   | 36,459  |                     |  |   | 36,459  |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                    |  |                      | 41,329  |   |                      |   | 41,352  |                     |  |   | 39,434  |  
|Total operating expenses                                                         |  |                      | 605,328 |   |                      |   | 605,893 |                     |  |   | 603,728 |  
|Income from operations                                                           |  |                      | 51,699  |   |                      |   | 51,134  |                     |  |   | 53,299  |  
|Interest expense                                                                 |  |                      | 36,392  |   |                      |   | 36,700  |                     |  |   | 39,329  |  
|Income before income taxes                                                       |  |                      | 15,307  |   |                      |   | 14,434  |                     |  |   | 13,970  |  
|Provision for income taxes                                                       |  |                      | 5,593   |   |                      |   | 5,169   |                     |  |   | 4,929   |  
|Net income                                                                       |  |                      | 9,714   |   |                      |   | 9,265   |                     |  |   | 9,041   |  
|                                                                                 |  |                      |        
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:                                           |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |                     |  |   |         |  
|Net income                                                                       |  | $                    | 9,714   |   |                      | $ | 9,265   |                     |  | $ | 9,041   |  
|Stock-based compensation                                                         |  |                      |        |   |                      |   | (151    | )                   |  |   | (151    | )
|Depreciation and amortization                                                    |  |                      | 41,329  |   |                      |   | 41,352  |                     |  |   | 39,434  |  
|Amortization of deferred financing costs                                         |  |                      | 1,437   |   |                      |   | 1,437   |                     |  |   | 1,528   |  
|Amortization of deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions                  |  |                      | (65     | ) |                      |   | (65     | )                   |  |   | (21     | )
|Accretion of interest on lease financing obligations                             |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                     |  |   | 478     |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                            |  |                      | 5,553   |   |                      |   | 5,129   |                     |  |   | 4,888   |  
|Other liabilities  long-term                                                    |  |                      | (4,379  | ) |                      |   | (5,533  | )                   |  |   | (1,223  | )
|Net cash provided from operating activities                                      |  |                      | 55,964  |   |                      |   | 55,964  |                     |  |   | 54,194  |  
|Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions                                        |  |                      | 13,738  |   |                      |   | 13,738  |                     |  |   | 8,435   |  
|Net cash used for investing activities                                           |  |                      | (55,071 | ) |                      |   | (55,071 | )                   |  |   | (46,636 | )
|Financing costs associated with issuance of debt and lease financing obligations |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                     |  |   | (296    | )
|Proceeds from lease financing obligations                                        |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                     |  |   | 5,600   |  
|Principal payments on lease financing obligations                                |  |                      | (1,769  | ) |                      |   | (1,769  | )                   |  |   |        |  
|Net cash used for financing activities                                           |  |                      | (760    | ) |                      |   | (760    | )                   |  |   | (7,425  | )



F-14



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity (Deficit):



|                                          |  |                      |         |   |                                      |   |         |                     |  |   |                      |   |  |                      |          |                     |  |   |        |  |   |          |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------- | - | ------------------------------------ | - | ------- | ------------------- |  | - | -------------------- | - |  | -------------------- | -------- | ------------------- |  | - | ------ |  | - | -------- | -
|                                          |  | Accumulated Deficit  |         |   | Total Stockholders Equity (Deficit) |  
|                                          |  | AsPreviouslyReported |         |   | AsPreviouslyRestated                 |   |         | AsCurrentlyRestated |  |   | AsPreviouslyReported |   |  | AsPreviouslyRestated |          | AsCurrentlyRestated | 
|Balance at December 31, 2001, as restated |  | $                    | (15,597 | ) |                                      | $ | (23,954 | )                   |  | $ | (25,515              | ) |  | $                    | 8,888    |                     |  | $ | 531    |  | $ | (1,030   | )
|Net income                                |  |                      | 9,714   |   |                                      |   | 9,265   |                     |  |   | 9,041                |   |  |                      | 9,714    |                     |  |   | 9,265  |  |   | 9,041    |  
|Balance at December 31, 2002              |  |                      | (5,883  | ) |                                      |   | (14,689 | )                   |  |   | (16,474              | ) |  |                      | 18,602   |                     |  |   | 9,796  |  |   | 8,011    |  
|Net income                                |  |                      | 2,368   |   |                                      |   | 1,819   |                     |  |   | 1,338                |   |  |                      | 2,368    |                     |  |   | 1,819  |  |   | 1,338    |  
|Balance at December 31, 2003              |  |                      | (3,515  | ) |                                      |   | (12,870 | )                   |  |   | (15,136              | ) |  |                      | 20,970   |                     |  |   | 11,615 |  |   | 9,349    |  
|Net loss                                  |  |                      | (7,205  | ) |                                      |   |        |                     |  |   | (8,084               | ) |  |                      | (7,205   | )                   |  |   |       |  |   | (8,084   | )
|Balance at December 31, 2004              |  |                      | (20,075 | ) |                                      |   | (12,870 | )                   |  |   | (23,220              | ) |  |                      | (112,384 | )                   |  |   | 11,615 |  |   | (115,529 | )

In the previous restatement, the accumulated deficit previously reported at December 31, 2001
of $15,597 had been restated to $23,954, which is an increase of $8,357, to reflect the effect of the previous restatement adjustments for the periods prior to fiscal 2002. Such cumulative adjustments also had the corresponding effect of decreasing
property and equipment by $10,542, increasing franchise rights by $12,519, decreasing goodwill by $3,416, increasing other lease related assets by $51, increasing accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits for stock-based compensation accruals by
$1,164, increasing other lease related liabilities by $2,626 and decreasing deferred tax assets by $3,179.

The accumulated deficit
previously restated at December 31, 2001 of $23,954 has been further restated to $25,515, which is an increase of $1,561, to reflect the effect of the current restatement adjustments for the periods prior to fiscal 2002. Such cumulative
adjustments had the corresponding effect of increasing property and equipment by $5,747, decreasing goodwill by $1,483, increasing deferred tax assets by $2,577, decreasing other assets by $343, increasing lease financing obligations by $8,189, and
decreasing deferred income-sale leaseback of real estate by $130.

All previously reported amounts affected by both the previous and the
current restatements that appear elsewhere in these footnotes to the consolidated financial statements have also been restated.



F-15



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



3. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment at December 31 consisted of the following:



|                                               |  |                        |          |   |                       |   |          |  
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | -------- | - | --------------------- | - | -------- | -
|                                               |  | Restated (Note 2) 2004 |          |   | Restated(Note 2) 2003 |  
|Land                                           |  | $                      | 54,682   |   |                       | $ | 58,161   |  
|Owned buildings                                |  |                        | 73,937   |   |                       |   | 76,509   |  
|Leasehold improvements                         |  |                        | 126,148  |   |                       |   | 120,863  |  
|Equipment                                      |  |                        | 178,994  |   |                       |   | 171,092  |  
|Capital leases                                 |  |                        | 12,299   |   |                       |   | 12,961   |  
|                                               |  |                        |          |   |                       |   |          |  
|                                               |  |                        | 446,060  |   |                       |   | 439,586  |  
|Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |  |                        | (232,571 | ) |                       |   | (201,418 | )
|                                               |  |                        |          |   |                       |   |          |  
|                                               |  | $                      | 213,489  |   |                       | $ | 238,168  |  
|                                               |  |                        |          |   |                       |   |          |  

Capital lease assets pertain primarily to buildings leased for certain restaurant locations.
Accumulated amortization pertaining to capital lease assets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $11,864 and $12,313, respectively. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, land of $45,551 and $44,018, respectively, and owned buildings of $57,186 and
$54,906, respectively, were subject to lease financing obligations accounted for under the financing method. Accumulated depreciation pertaining to owned buildings subject to lease financing obligations at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $21,877
and $18,672, respectively.

Depreciation expense for all property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
was $34,462, $36,024 and $35,317, respectively.

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, property and equipment, for impairment at the
restaurant level. If an indicator of impairment exists for any of the assets, an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by each restaurant is compared to that long-lived assets carrying value. If an asset is determined to be
impaired, the loss is measured by the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value. The Company recorded impairment charges for its segments, including Burger King franchise rights of $283 in 2004, as follows:



|            |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|----------- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | - | -----
|            |  | 2004 |       | 2003 |   | 2002 
|Burger King |  | $    | 1,544 |      | $ | 706   |  | $ | 1,033
|Taco Cabana |  |      |      |      |   | 3,445 |  |   | 252  
|            |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|            |  | $    | 1,544 |      | $ | 4,151 |  | $ | 1,285
|            |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |      

4. Goodwill and Franchise Rights

Goodwill.In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company has elected to test goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for
impairment at December 31. The Company has determined its reporting units to be at the operating segment level: regional operations of its Burger King restaurants, operating as franchisee; and Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana at the brand level.
No impairment losses have been recognized as a result of these tests since January 1, 2002.

Goodwill for Burger King, Pollo Tropical,
and Taco Cabana was $1,450, $56,307, and $64,484 respectively, at both December 31, 2004 and 2003.

Franchise Rights.The
Company assesses the potential impairment of franchise rights whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If an indicator of impairment exists, an estimate of the aggregate undiscounted cash
flows from the acquired restaurants is compared to the respective carrying value of franchise rights for each Burger King acquisition. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured by the excess of the carrying amount of the asset
over its fair value. The Company recorded impairment charges of $283 for the year ended December 31, 2004. No impairment charges were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. Following is a summary of the Companys
franchise rights as of the respective balance sheet dates:



F-16



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



|                 |  |                     |         |                         |   |                     |  |                         |         |  |   |       
|---------------- |  | ------------------- | ------- | ----------------------- | - | ------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- |  | - | ------
|                 |  | December 31, 2004   |         | December 31, 2003      
|                 |  | GrossCarryingAmount |         | AccumulatedAmortization |   | GrossCarryingAmount |  | AccumulatedAmortization
|Franchise Rights |  | $                   | 139,527 |                         | $ | 49,471              |  | $                       | 139,527 |  | $ | 46,238

Amortization expense related to Burger King franchise rights was $3,233 for each of the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. Estimated annual amortization is $3,233 for each of the years ending 2005 through 2009.

5. Other
Liabilities, Long-Term

Other liabilities, long-term, at December 31, consisted of the following:



|                                    |  |      |        |                    |   |       
|----------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ------------------ | - | ------
|                                    |  | 2004 |        | RestatedNote 22003
|Unearned purchase discounts         |  | $    | 8,611  |                    | $ | 10,888
|Accrued occupancy costs             |  |      | 11,400 |                    |   | 11,494
|Accrued workers compensation costs |  |      | 4,821  |                    |   | 3,848 
|Other                               |  |      | 3,620  |                    |   | 3,869 
|                                    |  |      |        |                    |   |       
|                                    |  | $    | 28,452 |                    | $ | 30,099
|                                    |  |      |        |                    |   |       

Unearned purchase discounts are amortized as a reduction of cost of sales either over the life of
the supplier contract or the estimated purchase commitment period. In 2000, Burger King Corporation arranged for the Coca-Cola Company and Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up, Inc. to provide funding to franchisees in connection with Burger Kings
transformation initiatives. The Company received approximately $19.8 million in 2000 and $1.6 million in 2001 under this arrangement with these suppliers. The total amount of these purchase discounts amortized for each of the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $2.2 million.

Accrued occupancy costs include obligations pertaining to closed restaurant
locations, contingent rent, accruals to expense operating lease rental payments on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and acquired leases with above market rentals.

In 2001, management made the decision to close seven Taco Cabana restaurants in the Phoenix, Arizona market and discontinue restaurant development
underway in that market. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company has $0.6 million in lease liability reserves at both dates and $0.1 and $0.2 million, respectively, in other exit cost reserves related to these restaurants that are included
in accrued occupancy costs. The following table presents the activity in the exit cost reserve:



|                  |  |      |     |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |        |  
|----------------- |  | ---- | --- | - | ---- | - | ---- | ---- |  | - | ------ | -
|                  |  | 2004 |     |   | 2003 |   |      | 2002 | 
|Beginning Balance |  | $    | 847 |   |      | $ | 700  |      |  | $ | 1,738  |  
|Additions         |  |      |    |   |      |   | 347  |      |  |   |       |  
|Payments          |  |      | (91 | ) |      |   | (200 | )    |  |   | (1,038 | )
|                  |  |      |     |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |        |  
|Ending Balance    |  | $    | 756 |   |      | $ | 847  |      |  | $ | 700    |  
|                  |  |      |     |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |        |  

6. Leases

The Company utilizes land and buildings in operation under various lease agreements. We do not consider any of these individual leases material to the Companys operations. Initial lease terms are generally for
twenty years and, in many cases, provide for renewal options and in some cases rent escalations. Certain leases require contingent rent, determined as a percentage of sales as defined by the terms of the applicable lease agreement. For most
locations, the Company is obligated for occupancy costs including payment of property taxes, insurance and utilities.

In the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company sold eight, thirty-one, and seven restaurant properties in sale-leaseback transactions for net proceeds of $10,984, $44,180 and $8,435, respectively. Deferred gains of $2,391, $5,399 and $1,330 for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, have been recorded as a result of these sale-leaseback transactions and are being amortized over the lives of the related leases. These related leases have been classified as
operating leases and generally contain a twenty-year initial term with renewal options. The amortization of deferred gains related to these sale-leaseback transactions was $458, $180 and $21 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.



F-17



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



Minimum rent commitments under capital and non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2004
were as follows:



|                                           |  |         |       |   |                             |   |        
|------------------------------------------ |  | ------- | ----- | - | --------------------------- | - | -------
|Years Ending                               |  | Capital |       |   | Restated (Note 2) Operating
|2005                                       |  | $       | 534   |   |                             | $ | 33,573 
|2006                                       |  |         | 438   |   |                             |   | 31,233 
|2007                                       |  |         | 289   |   |                             |   | 28,039 
|2008                                       |  |         | 114   |   |                             |   | 24,775 
|2009                                       |  |         | 79    |   |                             |   | 21,872 
|Thereafter                                 |  |         | 51    |   |                             |   | 167,166
|                                           |  |         |       |   |                             |   |        
|Total minimum lease payments               |  |         | 1,505 |   |                             | $ | 306,658
|                                           |  |         |       |   |                             |   |        
|Less amount representing interest          |  |         | (280  | ) |                             |   |        
|                                           |  |         |       |   |                             |   |        
|Total obligations under capital leases     |  |         | 1,225 |   |                             |   |        
|Less current portion                       |  |         | (411  | ) |                             |   |        
|                                           |  |         |       |   |                             |   |        
|Long-term obligations under capital leases |  | $       | 814   |   |                             |   |        
|                                           |  |         |       |   |                             |   |        

Total rent expense on operating leases, including percentage rent on both operating and capital
leases, for the past three fiscal years was as follows:



|                                               |  |                        |        |                      |   |                      |  |   |       
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | ------ | -------------------- | - | -------------------- |  | - | ------
|                                               |  | Restated (Note 2) 2004 |        | Restated(Note 2)2003 |   | Restated(Note 2)2002
|Minimum rent on real property                  |  | $                      | 32,509 |                      | $ | 29,100               |  | $ | 27,786
|Additional rent based on a percentage of sales |  |                        | 2,097  |                      |   | 1,989                |  |   | 3,154 
|                                               |  |                        |        |                      |   |                      |  |   |       
|Restaurant rent expense                        |  |                        | 34,606 |                      |   | 31,089               |  |   | 30,940
|Administrative rent                            |  |                        | 783    |                      |   | 782                  |  |   | 746   
|Equipment rent                                 |  |                        | 526    |                      |   | 373                  |  |   | 294   
|                                               |  |                        |        |                      |   |                      |  |   |       
|                                               |  | $                      | 35,915 |                      | $ | 32,244               |  | $ | 31,980
|                                               |  |                        |        |                      |   |                      |  |   |       

7. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt at December 31 consisted of:



|                                          |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------- | -
|                                          |  | 2004 |         |   | 2003 |  
|Secured:                                  |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Senior Credit Facility:                   |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Revolving credit facility                 |  | $    |        |   |      | $ | 600     |  
|Term loan A facility                      |  |      |        |   |      |   | 46,500  |  
|Term loan B facility                      |  |      | 220,000 |   |      |   | 77,000  |  
|Other notes payable                       |  |      |        |   |      |   | 117     |  
|Unsecured 91/2% senior subordinated notes |  |      |        |   |      |   | 170,000 |  
|Unsecured 9% senior subordinated notes    |  |      | 180,000 |   |      |   |        |  
|Capital leases                            |  |      | 1,225   |   |      |   | 1,615   |  
|                                          |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |  
|                                          |  |      | 401,225 |   |      |   | 295,832 |  
|Less current portion                      |  |      | (2,611  | ) |      |   | (14,005 | )
|                                          |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |  
|                                          |  | $    | 398,614 |   |      | $ | 281,827 |  
|                                          |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |  



F-18



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



December 2004 Refinancing

On December 15, 2004, the Company completed the private placement of $180.0 million of 9% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013. Concurrently, the
Company repaid all outstanding borrowings under its prior senior secured credit facility and amended and restated that credit facility with a new syndicate of lenders. The Company received $400.0 million in total proceeds that included the issuance
of the 9% senior subordinated notes and $220.0 million principal amount of term loan B borrowings under the senior credit facility. Those proceeds were primarily utilized to repay borrowings outstanding under the prior senior credit facility of
$74.4 million, to retire all unsecured 91/2% senior subordinated notes due 2008 outstanding in the amount,
including redemption premiums, of $175.9 million, to pay a dividend to Holdings and Holdings paid to its stockholders a dividend in the amount of $116.8 million, to pay fees and expenses related to the refinancing of $8.8 million, and to pay a bonus
to employees and a director totaling $20.9 million including payroll taxes of $0.6 million. See discussion of these payments in Note 11. The Company also recorded an $8.9 million loss on early extinguishment of debt from the write-off of previously
deferred financing costs and premiums in conjunction with the retirement of the 91/2% senior subordinated
notes.

Senior Secured Credit Facility:

On December 15, 2004, the Company entered into a new senior secured credit facility with a syndicate of lenders. The senior secured credit facility
provides for a revolving credit facility under which the Company may borrow up to $50.0 million (including a sub limit of up to $20.0 million for letters of credit and up to $5.0 million for swingline loans), a term loan B facility of $220.0 million
and incremental borrowing facilities, at the Companys option, of up to $100.0 million, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.

The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2003 was 4.5%. There were no borrowings outstanding on the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2004. After
reserving $10.9 million for letters of credit guaranteed by the facility, $39.1 million was available for borrowings under the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2004.

Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest at a per annum rate, at the Companys option, of either:



| | 1) | the greater of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus .50%, plus a margin ranging from .50% to 1.50% based on the Companys total leverage ratio; or
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.0% to 3.0% based on the Companys total leverage ratio.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Borrowings under the term loan B bear interest at a per annum rate, at the Companys option, of either:



| | 1) | the greater of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus .50%, plus a margin ranging from .75% to 1.0% based on the Companys total leverage ratio; or
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.25% to 2.50% based on the Companys total leverage ratio.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The revolving credit facility expires on December 31, 2009 and the term loan B facility matures on December 31, 2010.

Amounts under the term loan B facility are repayable as follows:



| | 1) | twenty quarterly installments of $0.55 million beginning on the last day of the first fiscal quarter in 2005; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | four quarterly installments of $52.25 million beginning with last day of the first fiscal quarter in 2010. The fourth and final installment is due and payable on the term loan B
maturity date.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Under the new senior credit facility, the Company is also required to make mandatory prepayments of principal
on term loan B facility borrowings (a) annually in an initial amount equal to 50% of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the new senior credit facility), (b) in the event of certain dispositions of assets (all subject to certain exceptions)
and insurance proceeds, in an amount equal to 100% of the net proceeds received by the Company, and (c) in an amount equal to 100% of the net proceeds from any subsequent issuance of debt.



F-19



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



In general, the Companys obligations under the new senior credit facility are guaranteed by
Holdings and all of the Companys material subsidiaries and are collateralized by all of the Companys and its subsidiaries assets, a pledge of the Companys common stock and the stock of each of the Companys subsidiaries. The
new senior credit facility contains certain covenants, including, without limitation, those limiting the Company and its subsidiaries ability to incur indebtedness, incur liens, sell or acquire assets or businesses, change the nature of its
business, engage in transactions with related parties, make certain investments or pay dividends. In addition, the Company is required to meet certain financial ratios, including fixed charge coverage, senior leverage, and total leverage ratios (all
as defined under the new senior credit facility). At December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with the covenants in its senior credit facility.

As a result of the original restatement of the Companys financial statements as discussed in Note 2, the Company was in default under its new senior credit facility by failing to timely furnish its annual
audited financial statements for fiscal year 2004 to its lenders. On May 19, 2005, the Company obtained a waiver of such default from its lenders that extended the time period to deliver the audited financial statements for the 2004 fiscal year
as well as the financial statements for the first quarter of 2005 to July 31, 2005. While the Company currently anticipates delivering its first quarter financial statements by July 31, 2005, its failure to deliver the financial statements
for the first quarter of 2005 by July 31, 2005 would constitute an event of default under the new senior credit facility. If such an event of default occurs under the new senior credit facility that is not waived, the lenders could cause all
amounts outstanding with respect to the borrowings to be due and payable immediately which in turn would result in cross defaults under the Indenture governing the senior subordinated notes. The Companys assets and cash flow may not be
sufficient to fully repay outstanding debt if accelerated upon an event of default.

Senior Subordinated Notes:

On December 15, 2004, the Company issued $180.0 million of 9% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013. The senior subordinated notes
bear interest at a rate of 9% payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 (commencing July 15, 2005) and mature on January 15, 2013. The notes are redeemable at the option of the Company in whole or in part on or after
January 15, 2009 at a price of 104.5% of the principal amount if redeemed before January 15, 2010, 102.25% of the principal amount if redeemed after January 15, 2010 but before January 15, 2011 and at 100% of the principal amount
after January 15, 2011.

In connection with the terms of the senior subordinated notes, because we did not complete an exchange offer
on or prior to June 13, 2005, the interest rate on the Companys 9% Senior Subordinated Notes was increased by 0.25% per annum for the 90-day period immediately following June 13, 2005 and will be increased by an additional
0.25% per annum for each subsequent 90-day period, with a maximum of 1.00% per annum of additional interest, in each case until an exchange offer is completed or the 9% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 become freely tradable under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Restrictive covenants under the 9% senior subordinated notes include limitations with respect to the
Companys ability to issue additional debt, incur liens, sell or acquire assets or businesses, pay dividends and make certain investments. The Company was in compliance at December 31, 2004 with the restrictive covenants with the indenture
governing the senior subordinated notes.

At December 31, 2004, principal payments required on all long-term debt are as follows:



|           |  |   |        
|---------- |  | - | -------
|2005       |  | $ | 2,611  
|2006       |  |   | 2,560  
|2007       |  |   | 2,446  
|2008       |  |   | 2,293  
|2009       |  |   | 2,268  
|Thereafter |  |   | 389,047
|           |  |   |        
|           |  | $ | 401,225
|           |  |   |        

The weighted average interest rate on all debt for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002 was 7.8%, 7.2% and 7.3%, respectively. Interest expense on the Companys long-term debt was $24,122, $26,689 and $29,156 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.



F-20



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



8. Lease Financing Obligations

The Company entered into sale-leaseback transactions in various years between 1991 and 2003 involving certain restaurant properties that have been classified as financing transactions under SFAS No. 98,
Accounting For Leases, (SFAS 98). Lease financing obligations pertain to real estate transactions required by SFAS 98 to be accounted for under the financing method. The assets (land and building) subject to these obligations
remain on the consolidated balance sheets at their historical costs and such assets (excluding land) continue to be depreciated over their remaining useful lives, the proceeds received by the Company from these transactions are recorded as a lease
financing obligation and the lease payments are applied as payments of principal and interest. The selection of the interest rate on lease financing obligations is evaluated based on the Companys incremental borrowing rate adjusted to the
rate required to prevent recognition of a non-cash loss or negative amortization of the obligation through the end of the primary lease term. If a purchase option exists for property subject to a lease financing obligation, this purchase option is
evaluated for its probability of exercise. At December 31, 2004 and 2003 there were no purchase options for properties subject to lease financing obligations that the Company deemed were probable of exercise.

These leases generally provide for an initial term of twenty years plus renewal options. The rent payable under such leases includes a minimum rent
provision and in some cases, includes rent based on a percentage of sales provision. These leases also require payment of property taxes, insurance and utilities.

Purchase options related to certain properties sold in real estate transactions accounted for under the financing method are held by an entity wholly-owned by the nephew of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company and such entity is deemed a related party.

At December 31, 2004, future minimum lease payments required on lease
financing obligations are as follows:



|                                            |  |                   |          |  
|------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | -------- | -
|                                            |  | Restated (Note 2) |         
|2005                                        |  | $                 | 10,729   |  
|2006                                        |  |                   | 10,830   |  
|2007                                        |  |                   | 10,947   |  
|2008                                        |  |                   | 11,332   |  
|2009                                        |  |                   | 11,425   |  
|Thereafter, through 2023                    |  |                   | 213,496  |  
|                                            |  |                   |          |  
|Total minimum lease payments                |  |                   | 268,759  |  
|Less: Interest implicit in lease obligation |  |                   | (157,044 | )
|                                            |  |                   |          |  
|Total lease financing obligations           |  | $                 | 111,715  |  
|                                            |  |                   |          |  

The interest rates on lease financing obligations range from 8.5% to 12.4%. Imputed interest
expense on lease financing obligations totaled $11,261, $10,645 and $10,173 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

9.
Other Expense

During 2004, the Companys parent company, Holdings, filed a registration statement on Form S-1 to register an
initial public offering of Enhanced Yield Securities (EYSs) and senior subordinated notes. Proceeds from this offering were to be used by the Company. On October 25, 2004 Holdings withdrew and terminated its registration of such securities. In
the third quarter of 2004, the Company expensed the costs incurred for this offering of $2.3 million.



F-21



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



10. Income Taxes

The income tax provision (benefit) was comprised of the following for the years ended December 31:



|                    |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                        |  |   |       |  
|------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------ | - | -------------------- | - | ------ | ---------------------- |  | - | ----- | -
|                    |  | Restated(Note 2)2004 |        |   | Restated(Note 2)2003 |   |        | Restated (Note 2) 2002 | 
|Current:            |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                        |  |   |       |  
|Federal             |  | $                    | (1,250 | ) |                      | $ | 1,404  |                        |  | $ | (591  | )
|Foreign             |  |                      | 306    |   |                      |   | 279    |                        |  |   | 272   |  
|State               |  |                      | 690    |   |                      |   | 214    |                        |  |   | 360   |  
|                    |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                        |  |   |       |  
|                    |  |                      | (254   | ) |                      |   | 1,897  |                        |  |   | 41    |  
|                    |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                        |  |   |       |  
|Deferred (prepaid): |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                        |  |   |       |  
|Federal             |  |                      | (3,981 | ) |                      |   | (1,305 | )                      |  |   | 4,979 |  
|State               |  |                      | (2,485 | ) |                      |   | 149    |                        |  |   | (91   | )
|                    |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                        |  |   |       |  
|                    |  |                      | (6,466 | ) |                      |   | (1,156 | )                      |  |   | 4,888 |  
|                    |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                        |  |   |       |  
|                    |  | $                    | (6,720 | ) |                      | $ | 741    |                        |  | $ | 4,929 |  
|                    |  |                      |        |   |                      |   |        |                        |  |   |       |  

The components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities at December 31, are as follows:



|                                                         |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------- | -
|                                                         |  | Restated(Note 2)2004 |         |   | Restated(Note 2)2003 |  
|Current deferred tax assets:                             |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |  
|Accounts receivable and other reserves                   |  | $                    | 181     |   |                      | $ | 249     |  
|Accrued vacation benefits                                |  |                      | 1,913   |   |                      |   | 1,533   |  
|Other accruals                                           |  |                      | 3,573   |   |                      |   | 2,695   |  
|Net federal operating loss carryforwards                 |  |                      | 575     |   |                      |   | 1,809   |  
|                                                         |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |  
|Total current deferred tax assets                        |  |                      | 6,242   |   |                      |   | 6,286   |  
|                                                         |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |  
|Long term deferred tax assets/(liabilities):             |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |  
|Deferred income on sale-leaseback of certain real estate |  |                      | 5,258   |   |                      |   | 4,292   |  
|Lease financing obligations                              |  |                      | 8,873   |   |                      |   | 7,580   |  
|Postretirement benefit expenses                          |  |                      | 1,386   |   |                      |   | 1,189   |  
|Property and equipment depreciation                      |  |                      | (775    | ) |                      |   | (5,049  | )
|Net state operating loss carryforwards                   |  |                      | 1,870   |   |                      |   | 926     |  
|Amortization of other intangible assets                  |  |                      | 2,995   |   |                      |   | 3,760   |  
|Amortization of franchise rights                         |  |                      | (22,129 | ) |                      |   | (22,016 | )
|Occupancy costs                                          |  |                      | 4,366   |   |                      |   | 4,981   |  
|Tax credit carryforwards                                 |  |                      | 6,213   |   |                      |   | 6,203   |  
|Unearned purchase discounts                              |  |                      | 4,258   |   |                      |   | 3,442   |  
|Other                                                    |  |                      | 625     |   |                      |   | 1,122   |  
|                                                         |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |  
|Total long-term net deferred tax assets                  |  |                      | 12,940  |   |                      |   | 6,430   |  
|                                                         |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |  
|Total net deferred tax assets                            |  | $                    | 19,182  |   |                      | $ | 12,716  |  
|                                                         |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |         |  

The Company has net operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax purposes of approximately
$1.6 million at December 31, 2004 that are not limited to their annual utilization. These net operating loss carryforwards expire in varying amounts beginning in 2019 through 2023. The Companys state net operating loss carryforwards
expire in varying amounts beginning in 2005 through 2024. In addition, the Company has available Federal alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $2.9 million with no expiration date and Federal employment tax credit carryforwards of $2.9
million that begin to expire in 2018.

Realization of the deferred income tax assets relating to net federal and state operating loss
carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of these carryforwards. Based upon results of operations, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will
generate sufficient future taxable income to fully realize the benefit of deferred tax assets, although there can be no assurance of this.



F-22



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective tax rates for the years
ended December 31 is as follows:



|                                                         |  |                      |        |   |                      |      |   |                      |   |      |   |  |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |      |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------ | - | -------------------- | ---- | - | -------------------- | - | ---- | - |  | ----- | - |  | - | ----- | - |  | ---- | -
|                                                         |  | Restated(Note 2)2004 |        |   | Restated(Note 2)2003 |      |   | Restated(Note 2)2002 |  
|Statutory federal income tax rate                        |  | $                    | (5,033 | ) |                      | 34.0 | % |                      | $ | 707  |   |  | 34.0  | % |  | $ | 4,750 |   |  | 34.0 | %
|State income and franchise taxes, net of federal benefit |  |                      | (1,366 | ) |                      | 9.2  |   |                      |   | 271  |   |  | 13.0  |   |  |   | 214   |   |  | 1.5  |  
|Non-deductible expenses                                  |  |                      | 5      |   |                      |     |   |                      |   | 101  |   |  | 4.8   |   |  |   | 42    |   |  | 0.3  |  
|Foreign taxes                                            |  |                      | 306    |   |                      | (2.1 | ) |                      |   | 279  |   |  | 13.2  |   |  |   | 273   |   |  | 2.0  |  
|Employment tax credits                                   |  |                      | (287   | ) |                      | 2.0  |   |                      |   | (354 | ) |  | (16.8 | ) |  |   | (202  | ) |  | (1.4 | )
|Deferred revaluation                                     |  |                      |       |   |                      |     |   |                      |   | (193 | ) |  | (9.2  | ) |  |   | (27   | ) |  | (0.2 | )
|Foreign tax credits                                      |  |                      | (306   | ) |                      | 2.1  |   |                      |   |     |   |  |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |     |  
|Miscellaneous                                            |  |                      | (39    | ) |                      | 0.2  |   |                      |   | (70  | ) |  | (3.3  | ) |  |   | (121  | ) |  | (0.9 | )
|                                                         |  |                      |        |   |                      |      |   |                      |   |      |   |  |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |      |  
|                                                         |  | $                    | (6,720 | ) |                      | 45.4 | % |                      | $ | 741  |   |  | 35.7  | % |  | $ | 4,929 |   |  | 35.3 | %
|                                                         |  |                      |        |   |                      |      |   |                      |   |      |   |  |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |      |  

The Company and its subsidiaries file their tax returns on a consolidated basis with its parent,
Holdings. The Company has determined that it should have requested permission from the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) in order for Holdings and its subsidiaries to file consolidated federal income tax returns for certain prior
taxable years. Accordingly, Holdings has filed a ruling request with the IRS requesting such permission. The Company expects that such request will be granted. Moreover, if such request is denied, the Company believes that it could still properly
have filed a consolidated return with the subsidiaries comprising the Taco Cabana and Pollo Tropical businesses, but this result is uncertain. If the IRS were to successfully challenge the inclusion of those subsidiaries in Carrols
consolidated tax return, it is estimated that the Company would owe back taxes in an aggregate amount ranging from approximately $5.1 million to approximately $8.1 million plus interest (tax-effected) ranging from approximately $0.7 million to
approximately $1.1 million. In such event, the Company would have net operating loss carryforwards that could be utilized to offset future taxable income of the Carrols group, and only the interest would negatively impact Carrols earnings.

11. Dividend and Bonus Payments

On
December 22, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the payment of a cash dividend of $116.8 million to Holdings from the net proceeds of the December 2004 refinancing. The cash dividend was paid on December 28, 2004 and
concurrently distributed by Holdings in a dividend to the stockholders of Holdings.

In conjunction with the December 2004 refinancing, the
Company also approved a compensatory bonus payment of approximately $20.3 million to a number of employees (including management) and a director who owned options to purchase common stock on a pro rata basis in proportion to the number of shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of options owned by such persons. The bonus payment was made in January 2005 and including applicable payroll taxes totaled $20.9 million.

12. Stockholders Equity

The Company.The Company has 1,000 shares of common stock
authorized of which 10 shares are issued and outstanding. The Company is 100% owned by Holdings. Dividends on the Companys common stock are restricted to amounts permitted by the new senior secured credit facility and the indenture entered
into with respect to the 9% senior subordinated notes.

Holdings.Holdings Restated Certificate of Incorporation authorizes
7,000,000 shares of common stock and 100,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.01. Of the 7,000,000 common shares authorized, 1,144,144 shares of Holdings common stock and no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2004.

Prior to October 27, 2004, Holdings authorized common stock had been designated to consist of three
series comprised of 3,000,000 shares of Carrols Stock, par value $0.01 per share, 2,000,000 shares of Pollo Tropical Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 2,000,000 shares of Taco Cabana Stock, par value $0.01 per share. The Pollo Tropical and Taco



F-23



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



Cabana classes of Holdings stock were considered tracking stocks, a class of stock which tracked the separate performance of Pollo Tropical and Taco
Cabana, respectively. On October 27, 2004, Holdings eliminated this tracking stock by combining all of its authorized series of common stock into one series of common stock. Holdings Pollo Tropical class of common stock and Holdings
Taco Cabana class of common stock were each converted into the series of common stock known as Carrols Stock, which at the time of the combination, was renamed and is now referred to as common stock.

At or prior to October 27, 2004, no shares of Holdings Pollo Tropical or Taco Cabana classes of common stock were outstanding. However, as a
result of the combination, each outstanding option to purchase a share of Holdings Pollo Tropical class of common stock pursuant to the 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan was converted on October 27, 2004 into an option to
purchase 0.4144 shares of Holdings common stock. Similarly, each outstanding option to purchase a share of Holdings Taco Cabana class of common stock pursuant to the 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan was converted on
October 27, 2004 into an option to purchase 0.0522 shares of Holdings common stock. Subsequent to the conversion of the tracking stock options, any Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana options previously considered to be fixed awards are now
considered to be variable as a result of the repricing and the reduction in the option price. Accordingly, the Company will recognize compensation expense for changes in the intrinsic option value over future periods.

Stock Options.In 1996, Holdings adopted a stock option plan entitled the 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan (1996 Plan) and authorized a
total of 106,250 shares of Holdings common stock. The number of shares reserved and authorized under this plan was increased to 111,250 in 2001 and to 189,325 in 2002. Options under this plan generally vest over a four-year period. In 1998,
Holdings adopted the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan (1998 Directors Plan) authorizing the grant of up to 10,000 options to non-employee directors. Options under this plan are exercisable over four years. Also, options for
32,427 shares of Holdings common stock not covered under any plan (Non Plan Options) were granted in 1997 at a price of $101.76 with vesting over a five-year period. On February 26, 2002, the Compensation Committee of Holdings
extended the expiration date for the Non Plan Options and the 1996 Plan options granted prior to March 1, 2002 to February 29, 2012 for all executive officers and certain other officers of the Company.

Holdings also adopted the 1998 Pollo Tropical Long-Term Incentive Plan (1998 Pollo Plan) authorizing to grant up to 41,440 shares of
Holdings common stock (100,000 shares of Holdings Pollo Tropical class of common stock prior to the conversion). Holdings also adopted the 2001 Taco Cabana Long-Term Incentive Plan (2001 Taco Plan) authorizing to grant up to
26,100 shares of Holdings common stock (500,000 shares of Holdings Taco Cabana class of common stock prior to the conversion). Options under both of these plans generally vest over a five-year period.

In December 2004, the terms of the Companys option grants were reevaluated. Under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, certain provisions of the option plans require the Company to account for its option plans using a variable accounting treatment. Under variable accounting, compensation expense must
be remeasured each balance sheet date based on the difference between the current market price of the Companys stock and the options exercise price. An accrual for compensation expense is determined based on the proportionate vested
amount of each option as prescribed by Financial Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans. Each period, adjustments to the accrual are recognized in the income
statement. Previously, the Company had accounted for its options using a fixed accounting treatment whereby compensation expense, if any, was only evaluated at the date of the option grant. The impact of this adjustment was to increase stock-based
compensation expense by $1,818 in fiscal year 2004 and $253 in fiscal year 2003 and decrease stock-based compensation expense by $151 in fiscal year 2002.



F-24



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



A summary of all option activity under Holdings stock option plans for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was as follows:



|                                                       |  |                |        |           |   |            |               |  |            |           |  |           |           |   |  |   |           |  
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------- | ------ | --------- | - | ---------- | ------------- |  | ---------- | --------- |  | --------- | --------- | - |  | - | --------- | -
|                                                       |  | NonPlanOptions |        | 1996 Plan |   |            | DirectorsPlan |  | Pollo Plan |           |  | Taco Plan |          
|Outstanding at December 31, 2001                       |  |                | 32,427 |           |   | 109,179    |               |  |            | 2,500     |  |           | 78,250    |   |  |   | 195,000   |  
|Granted                                                |  |                |       |           |   | 71,435     |               |  |            | 500       |  |           | 7,700     |   |  |   | 132,000   |  
|Canceled                                               |  |                |       |           |   | (511       | )             |  |            |          |  |           | (1,875    | ) |  |   | (21,000   | )
|                                                       |  |                |        |           |   |            |               |  |            |           |  |           |           |   |  |   |           |  
|Outstanding at December 31, 2002                       |  |                | 32,427 |           |   | 180,103    |               |  |            | 3,000     |  |           | 84,075    |   |  |   | 306,000   |  
|Granted                                                |  |                |       |           |   | 5,250      |               |  |            | 500       |  |           | 6,900     |   |  |   | 104,500   |  
|Canceled                                               |  |                |       |           |   | (1,705     | )             |  |            |          |  |           | (200      | ) |  |   | (71,500   | )
|                                                       |  |                |        |           |   |            |               |  |            |           |  |           |           |   |  |   |           |  
|Outstanding at December 31, 2003                       |  |                | 32,427 |           |   | 183,648    |               |  |            | 3,500     |  |           | 90,775    |   |  |   | 339,000   |  
|Granted                                                |  |                |       |           |   | 3,100      |               |  |            | 500       |  |           | 8,725     |   |  |   | 85,500    |  
|Canceled                                               |  |                |       |           |   | (649       | )             |  |            |          |  |           | (750      | ) |  |   | (15,724   | )
|Redeemed                                               |  |                |       |           |   | (502       | )             |  |            |          |  |           | (22,470   | ) |  |   |          |  
|Merger of tracking stock to common stock               |  |                |       |           |   |           |               |  |            |          |  |           | (56,777   | ) |  |   | (387,967  | )
|                                                       |  |                |        |           |   |            |               |  |            |           |  |           |           |   |  |   |           |  
|Outstanding at December 31, 2004                       |  |                | 32,427 |           |   | 185,597    |               |  |            | 4,000     |  |           | 19,503    |   |  |   | 20,809    |  
|                                                       |  |                |        |           |   |            |               |  |            |           |  |           |           |   |  |   |           |  
|                                                       |  |                |        |           |  
|                                                       |  | NonPlanOptions |        | 1996 Plan |   |            | DirectorsPlan |  | Pollo Plan |           |  | Taco Plan |          
|Grant Prices (in whole dollars):                       |  |                |        |           |   |            |               |  |            |           |  |           |           |   |  |   |           |  
|2002                                                   |  |                |       |           | $ | 113.00     |               |  | $          | 113.00    |  | $         | 153.00    |   |  | $ | 12.50     |  
|2003                                                   |  |                |       |           |   | 124.00     |               |  |            | 124.00    |  |           | 164.00    |   |  |   | 14.25     |  
|2004                                                   |  |                |       |           |   | 127.00     |               |  |            | 127.00    |  |           | 183.00    |   |  |   | 14.50     |  
|Average Option Price (in whole dollars):               |  |                |        |           |   |            |               |  |            |           |  |           |           |   |  |   |           |  
|At December 31, 2002                                   |  | $              | 101.76 |           | $ | 109.65     |               |  | $          | 116.00    |  | $         | 101.66    |   |  | $ | 11.92     |  
|At December 31, 2003                                   |  |                | 101.76 |           |   | 110.00     |               |  |            | 117.14    |  |           | 106.29    |   |  |   | 12.59     |  
|At December 31, 2004                                   |  |                | 101.76 |           |   | 110.22     |               |  |            | 118.38    |  |           | 153.40    |   |  |   | 156.46    |  
|Options Exercisable:                                   |  |                |        |           |   |            |               |  |            |           |  |           |           |   |  |   |           |  
|At December 31, 2002                                   |  |                | 32,427 |           |   | 170,725    |               |  |            | 2,250     |  |           | 62,065    |   |  |   | 96,600    |  
|At December 31, 2003                                   |  |                | 32,427 |           |   | 175,426    |               |  |            | 2,750     |  |           | 77,480    |   |  |   | 141,200   |  
|At December 31, 2004                                   |  |                | 32,427 |           |   | 179,185    |               |  |            | 3,250     |  |           | 13,432    |   |  |   | 11,029    |  
|Range of Exercise Prices for:                          |  |                |        |           |   |            |               |  |            |           |  |           |           |   |  |   |           |  
|Options Exercisable at December 31, 2004               |  | $              | 101.76 |           | $ | 101  $127 |               |  | $          | 110  127 |  | $         | 29  $285 |   |  | $ | 127  184 |  
|Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) |  |                | 7.3    |           |   | 7.2        |               |  |            | 6.1       |  |           | 6.0       |   |  |   | 7.4       |  

Subsequent Event.Effective May 3, 2005, Holdings issued an aggregate of 260,600
shares of Holdings common stock in exchange for the cancellation and termination of an identical number of outstanding options to purchase shares of Holdings common stock. As a consequence of the exchange, all outstanding stock options
were cancelled and terminated. All shares were issued pursuant to stock award agreements, which provide that such shares are fully vested and non-forfeitable upon issuance, but may not be sold or otherwise disposed of for a period of two years from
the date of issuance. Such agreements also provide that up to an aggregate of 16% of each recipients shares (for those recipients that were issued 100 or more shares) are subject to repurchase by Carrols Holdings (at its option) after
December 31, 2006 under certain circumstances described in the award agreements. In addition, such shares may be subject to repurchase by Carrols Holdings (at its option) in the event of a termination of employment before the occurrence of
certain events. The Company expects to record a compensation charge in the second quarter of 2005 relative to these stock awards.



F-25



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



13. Business Segment Information

The Company is engaged in the quick-service and quick-casual restaurant industry, with three restaurant concepts: Burger King operating as a franchisee, Pollo Tropical and Taco Cabana, both Company owned concepts. The
Companys Burger King restaurants are all located in the United States, primarily in the Northeast, Southeast and Midwest. Pollo Tropical is a regional quick-casual restaurant chain featuring grilled marinated chicken and authentic made
from scratch side dishes. Pollo Tropicals core markets are located in south and central Florida. Taco Cabana is a regional quick-casual restaurant chain featuring Mexican style food, including, flame-grilled beef and chicken fajitas,
quesadillas and other Tex-Mex dishes. Taco Cabanas core markets are primarily located in Texas.

The accounting policies of each
segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The following table includes measures of segment profit or loss reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of allocating resources to the
segments and assessing their performance. Segment EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, impairment losses, stock-based compensation expense, bonus to employees and director, other expense and
loss on extinguishment of debt.

The Other column includes corporate related items not allocated to reportable segments. Other
identifiable assets consist primarily of cash, certain other assets, corporate property and equipment, goodwill and deferred income taxes.



|                                            |  |             |         |                |   |                         |  |       |         |              |   |         |  |   |        
|------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- | ------- | -------------- | - | ----------------------- |  | ----- | ------- | ------------ | - | ------- |  | - | -------
|                                            |  | Taco Cabana |         | Pollo Tropical |   | Burger King Restaurants |  | Other |         | Consolidated
|Year Ended December 31, 2004 (as restated): |  |             |         |                |   |                         |  |       |         |              |   |         |  |   |        
|Revenues                                    |  | $           | 202,941 |                | $ | 125,101                 |  | $     | 369,837 |              | $ |        |  | $ | 697,879
|Cost of sales                               |  |             | 60,435  |                |   | 38,986                  |  |       | 103,203 |              |   |        |  |   | 202,624
|Restaurant wages and related expenses       |  |             | 57,702  |                |   | 31,380                  |  |       | 117,650 |              |   |        |  |   | 206,732
|Depreciation and amortization               |  |             | 9,884   |                |   | 4,460                   |  |       | 22,078  |              |   | 2,099   |  |   | 38,521 
|Segment EBITDA                              |  |             | 30,082  |                |   | 27,891                  |  |       | 36,582  |              |   |         |  |   |        
|Identifiable assets                         |  |             | 63,655  |                |   | 50,177                  |  |       | 198,015 |              |   | 204,399 |  |   | 516,246
|Capital expenditures                        |  |             | 6,555   |                |   | 6,636                   |  |       | 4,811   |              |   | 1,071   |  |   | 19,073 
|                                            |  |             |         |                |  
|Year Ended December 31, 2003 (as restated): |  |             |         |                |   |                         |  |       |         |              |   |         |  |   |        
|Revenues                                    |  | $           | 181,481 |                | $ | 110,194                 |  | $     | 353,310 |              | $ |        |  | $ | 644,985
|Cost of sales                               |  |             | 53,562  |                |   | 33,260                  |  |       | 94,360  |              |   |        |  |   | 181,182
|Restaurant wages and related expenses       |  |             | 52,214  |                |   | 28,105                  |  |       | 113,996 |              |   |        |  |   | 194,315
|Depreciation and amortization               |  |             | 8,707   |                |   | 4,451                   |  |       | 24,236  |              |   | 2,834   |  |   | 40,228 
|Segment EBITDA                              |  |             | 24,206  |                |   | 22,489                  |  |       | 37,350  |              |   |         |  |   |        
|Identifiable assets                         |  |             | 72,763  |                |   | 46,650                  |  |       | 220,025 |              |   | 159,616 |  |   | 499,054
|Capital expenditures                        |  |             | 16,505  |                |   | 4,359                   |  |       | 8,103   |              |   | 1,404   |  |   | 30,371 
|                                            |  |             |         |                |  
|Year Ended December 31, 2002 (as restated): |  |             |         |                |   |                         |  |       |         |              |   |         |  |   |        
|Revenues                                    |  | $           | 175,411 |                | $ | 101,497                 |  | $     | 380,119 |              | $ |        |  | $ | 657,027
|Cost of sales                               |  |             | 51,320  |                |   | 30,805                  |  |       | 101,851 |              |   |        |  |   | 183,976
|Restaurant wages and related expenses       |  |             | 51,007  |                |   | 26,497                  |  |       | 118,754 |              |   |        |  |   | 196,258
|Depreciation and amortization               |  |             | 7,948   |                |   | 3,966                   |  |       | 24,565  |              |   | 2,955   |  |   | 39,434 
|Segment EBITDA                              |  |             | 27,989  |                |   | 21,946                  |  |       | 43,932  |              |   |         |  |   |        
|Identifiable assets                         |  |             | 91,791  |                |   | 56,678                  |  |       | 243,732 |              |   | 162,586 |  |   | 554,787
|Capital expenditures                        |  |             | 16,749  |                |   | 9,257                   |  |       | 26,731  |              |   | 1,418   |  |   | 54,155 



F-26



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



A reconciliation of segment EBITDA to consolidated net income (loss) is as follows:



|                                          |  |                         |        |   |                    |   |                    |  |   |        |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------ | - | ------------------ |  | - | ------ | -
|                                          |  | Year Ended December 31, |       
|                                          |  | RestatedNote 2 2004     |        |   | RestatedNote 22003 |   | RestatedNote 22002 | 
|Segment EBITDA:                           |  |                         |        |   |                    |   |                    |  |   |        |  
|Taco Cabana                               |  | $                       | 30,082 |   |                    | $ | 24,206             |  | $ | 27,989 |  
|Pollo Tropical                            |  |                         | 27,891 |   |                    |   | 22,489             |  |   | 21,946 |  
|Burger King                               |  |                         | 36,582 |   |                    |   | 37,350             |  |   | 43,932 |  
|                                          |  |                         |        |   |                    |   |                    |  |   |        |  
|Subtotal                                  |  |                         | 94,555 |   |                    |   | 84,045             |  |   | 93,867 |  
|Less:                                     |  |                         |        |   |                    |   |                    |  |   |        |  
|Depreciation and amortization             |  |                         | 38,521 |   |                    |   | 40,228             |  |   | 39,434 |  
|Impairment losses                         |  |                         | 1,544  |   |                    |   | 4,151              |  |   | 1,285  |  
|Interest expense                          |  |                         | 35,383 |   |                    |   | 37,334             |  |   | 39,329 |  
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes      |  |                         | (6,720 | ) |                    |   | 741                |  |   | 4,929  |  
|Bonus to employees and director           |  |                         | 20,860 |   |                    |   |                   |  |   |       |  
|Stock-based compensation expense (income) |  |                         | 1,818  |   |                    |   | 253                |  |   | (151   | )
|Loss on extinguishment of debt            |  |                         | 8,913  |   |                    |   |                   |  |   |       |  
|Other expense                             |  |                         | 2,320  |   |                    |   |                   |  |   |       |  
|                                          |  |                         |        |   |                    |   |                    |  |   |        |  
|Net income (loss)                         |  | $                       | (8,084 | ) |                    | $ | 1,338              |  | $ | 9,041  |  
|                                          |  |                         |        |   |                    |   |                    |  |   |        |  

14. Commitments and Contingencies

On November 16, 1998, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of New York (the Court), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, against the Company. The complaint alleged that the Company engaged in a pattern and practice of unlawful discrimination, harassment and
retaliation against former and current female employees. The EEOC identified approximately 450 individuals that it believed represented the class of claimants and was seeking monetary and injunctive relief from Carrols.

On April 20, 2005, the Court issued a decision and order granting the Companys Motion for Summary Judgment which the Company filed in January
2004. Subject to possible appeal by the EEOC, the case is dismissed, however the court noted that it was not ruling on the claims, if any, that individual employees might have against the Company. The Company does not believe that any individual
claim, if any, would have a material adverse impact on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.

On
November 30, 2002, four former hourly employees commenced a lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York entitled Dawn Seever, et al. v. Carrols Corporation. The lawsuit alleges, in
substance, that the Company violated certain minimum wage laws under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and related state laws by requiring employees to work without recording their time and by retaliating against those who complained. The
plaintiffs seek damages, costs and injunctive relief. They also seek to notify, and eventually certify, a class consisting of current and former employees who, since 1998, have worked, or are working, for the Company. On February 25, 2005 the
plaintiffs filed motions for judicial notice and to expand discovery class-wide. The Company has opposed plaintiffs motions. It is too early to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or estimate the amount or range of
potential loss. Consequently, it is not possible to predict what adverse impact, if any, this case could have on the Companys consolidated financial condition or results of operations and cash flows. The Company intends to continue to contest
this case vigorously.

The Company is a party to various other litigation matters incidental to the conduct of business. The Company does
not believe that the outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.



F-27



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



15. Retirement Plans

Prior to July 1, 2002, the Company offered three retirement plans, a savings plan for its salaried Burger King employees (the Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan) and 401(k) plans for its
Pollo Tropical employees (the Pollo Tropical 401(k) Plan) and its Taco Cabana employees (the Taco Cabana Plan).

Effective July 1, 2002, the Company restated the Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, and the Pollo Tropical 401(k) Plan and the Taco Cabana Plan were merged into the Carrols Corporation Plan (the Plan). Under the
restated plan, the Companys contributions begin to vest after one year and fully vest after five years of service. A year of service is defined as a plan year during which an employee completes at least 1,000 hours of service. The Company may
elect to contribute to the Plan on an annual basis. The Companys contributions are equal to 50% of the employees contribution to a maximum Company contribution of $520 annually for any plan year that the Company participates in an
employee match. The Plan includes a savings option pursuant to section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code in addition to a post tax savings option. Participating employees may contribute up to 18% of their salary annually to either of the savings
options, subject to other limitations. The employees have various investment options available under a trust established by the Plan. Contributions to the Plan were $432 and $426 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. For
the 2004 plan year, the Company did not make any matching contributions.

Under the Pollo Tropical 401(k) Plan and Taco Cabana Plan, all
employees who were age 21 or older and who had been credited with at least 1,000 hours of service within 12 consecutive months were eligible to participate in the plan. Employees could contribute up to 15% of their salary on a pre-tax basis, and
could self-direct contributions to various investment options. The Company made discretionary matching contributions, which were allocated to participants based on the participants eligible deferrals during the plan year. Company contributions
to the Pollo Tropical 401(k) Plan and Taco Cabana Plan vested at a rate of 33% and 20%, respectively for each year of service and were $20 for the year ended December 31, 2002.



F-28



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



16. Postretirement Benefits

The Company provides postretirement medical and life insurance benefits covering substantially all Burger King administrative and restaurant management salaried employees. A December 31, measurement date is used
for the postretirement benefits. The following is the plan status and accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) at December 31, 2004 and 2003:



|                                                          |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ | -
|                                                          |  | 2004 |        |   | 2003 |  
|Change in benefit obligation:                             |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Benefit obligation at beginning of year                   |  | $    | 4,310  |   |      | $ | 3,331  |  
|Service cost                                              |  |      | 381    |   |      |   | 287    |  
|Interest cost                                             |  |      | 251    |   |      |   | 232    |  
|Plan participants contributions                          |  |      | 1      |   |      |   | 2      |  
|Actuarial loss                                            |  |      | 107    |   |      |   | 610    |  
|Benefits paid                                             |  |      | (107   | ) |      |   | (152   | )
|                                                          |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Benefit obligation at end of year                         |  |      | 4,943  |   |      |   | 4,310  |  
|Change in plan assets:                                    |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year            |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Employer contributions                                    |  |      | 106    |   |      |   | 150    |  
|Plan participants contributions                          |  |      | 1      |   |      |   | 2      |  
|Benefits paid                                             |  |      | (107   | ) |      |   | (152   | )
|                                                          |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Fair value of plan assets at end of year                  |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|                                                          |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Funded status                                             |  |      | 4,943  |   |      |   | 4,310  |  
|Unrecognized prior service cost                           |  |      | 103    |   |      |   | 133    |  
|Unrecognized net actuarial net loss                       |  |      | (1,542 | ) |      |   | (1,481 | )
|                                                          |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Accrued benefit cost                                      |  | $    | 3,504  |   |      | $ | 2,962  |  
|                                                          |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Weighted average assumptions:                             |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Discount rate used to determine benefit obligations       |  |      | 5.75   | % |      |   | 6.15   | %
|                                                          |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Discount rate used to determine net periodic benefit cost |  |      | 6.15   | % |      |   | 6.75   | %
|                                                          |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  

The discount rate is determined based on high-quality fixed income investments that match the
duration of expected retiree medical and life insurance benefits. The Company has typically used the corporate AA/Aa bond rate for this assumption.

Assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31:



|                                                                                  |  |       |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----- | - |  | ----- | - |  | ----- | -
|                                                                                  |  | 2004  |   |  | 2003  |   |  | 2002  |  
|Medical benefits cost trend rate assumed for the following year                   |  | 8.25  | % |  | 8.50  | % |  | 9.00  | %
|Prescription drug benefit cost trend rate assumed for the following year          |  | 12.00 | % |  | 12.00 | % |  | 13.00 | %
|Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate) |  | 5.00  | % |  | 5.00  | % |  | 5.00  | %
|Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate                                |  | 2012  |   |  | 2010  |   |  | 2010  |  

During 2005, the Company expects to contribute approximately $99 to its postretirement benefit
plan. The benefits expected to be paid in each year from 2005 through 2009 are $99, $100, $103, $107 and $125, respectively, and for the years 2010-2014 the aggregate amount of $1,027.

On May 19, 2004, FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-2 Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (FAS 106-2) was issued. FAS 106-2 provides guidance on the accounting for the effects of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act) for employers that sponsor
postretirement health care plans that provide prescription drug benefits. FAS 106-2 also requires those employers to provide certain disclosures in their financial statements regarding the effect of the federal subsidy provided by the Act (the
Subsidy) beginning in the third quarter of 2004. The Subsidy will not impact the Companys cash flows until 2006.



F-29



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



The Company has reviewed the methods prescribed in the Act to calculate the impact of the Subsidy.
Due to the Subsidy, for the year ended December 31, 2004, the effect on postretirement benefit expense was a reduction of $62 and the effect on the accumulated benefit obligation was a reduction of $646 at December 31, 2004.



|                                                |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |     |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --- | - | ---- | - | --- | ---- |  | - | --- | -
|                                                |  | 2004 |     |   | 2003 |   |     | 2002 | 
|Components of net periodic benefit cost:        |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |     |  
|Service cost                                    |  | $    | 381 |   |      | $ | 287 |      |  | $ | 223 |  
|Interest cost                                   |  |      | 251 |   |      |   | 232 |      |  |   | 195 |  
|Amortization of gains and losses                |  |      | 46  |   |      |   | 37  |      |  |   | 18  |  
|Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost |  |      | (30 | ) |      |   | (30 | )    |  |   | (30 | )
|                                                |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |     |  
|Net periodic postretirement benefit cost        |  | $    | 648 |   |      | $ | 526 |      |  | $ | 406 |  
|                                                |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |     |  

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the
health care plans. A one-percentage-point change in the health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:



|                                                        |  |            |     |            |   |      |  
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | --- | ---------- | - | ---- | -
|                                                        |  | 1%Increase |     | 1%Decrease |  
|Effect on total of service and interest cost components |  | $          | 130 |            | $ | (104 | )
|Effect on postretirement benefit obligation             |  |            | 930 |            |   | (756 | )

17. Guarantor Financial Statements

The Companys obligation under the $180.0 million 9% senior subordinated notes of the Company are, and the $170.0 million 91/2% senior subordinated notes of the Company were, jointly and severally guaranteed in full on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by certain of the Companys subsidiaries (Guarantor Subsidiaries), all of which are
directly or indirectly wholly-owned by the Company. These subsidiaries are:

Cabana Beverages, Inc.

Cabana Bevco LLC

Carrols Realty Holdings

Carrols Realty I Corp.

Carrols Realty II Corp.

Carrols J.G. Corp.

Quanta Advertising Corp.

Pollo Franchise, Inc.

Pollo Operations, Inc.

Taco Cabana, Inc.

TP Acquisition Corp.

TC Bevco
LLC

T.C. Management, Inc.

TC
Lease Holdings III, V and VI, Inc.

Get Real, Inc.

Texas Taco Cabana, L.P.

The following supplemental financial information sets forth on a condensed
consolidating basis, consolidating balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of cash flows for the Parent Company only, Guarantor Subsidiaries and for the Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. All previously reported amounts affected by both the previous and the current restatements discussed in Note 2 have also been restated.

For certain of the Companys sale-leaseback transactions, the Parent Company has guaranteed on an unsecured basis the rental payments of its
subsidiaries. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 90-14, Unsecured Guarantee by Parent of Subsidiarys Lease Payments in a Sale-Leaseback Transaction, the Company has included in the following Guarantor
Financial Statements amounts pertaining to these leases as if they were accounted for as financing transactions of the Guarantor subsidiaries. These adjustments are eliminated in consolidation.



F-30



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



For purposes of the guarantor financial statements, the Company and its subsidiaries determine the
applicable tax provision for each entity generally using the separate return method. Under this method, current and deferred taxes are allocated to each reporting entity as if it were to file a separate tax return. The rules followed by the
reporting entity in computing its tax obligation or refund, including the effects of the alternative minimum tax, would be the same as those followed in filing a separate return with the Internal Revenue Service. However, for purposes of evaluating
an entitys ability to realize its tax attributes, the Company assesses whether it is more likely than not that those assets will be realized at the consolidated level. Under this approach, to the extent that no valuation allowance has been
provided in the consolidated financial statements, there would typically be no need for a valuation allowance in the separate accounts of the individual entities. Any differences in the total of the income tax provision (benefit) for the Parent
Company Only and the Guarantor Subsidiaries, as calculated on the separate return method, and the consolidated income tax provision (benefit) are eliminated in consolidation.

The Company provides some administrative support to its subsidiaries related to executive management, information systems and certain accounting, legal
and other administrative functions. For purposes of the guarantor financial statements, the Company allocates such corporate costs on a specific identification basis, where applicable, or based on revenues or the number of restaurants for each
subsidiary. Management believes that these allocations are reasonable based on the nature of costs incurred. Prior to the current year, the Company did not allocate these corporate costs to its subsidiaries.

As part of the original restatement, the Company restated the guarantor financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002, to reflect the allocation of the corporate costs to conform to the current year presentation and, in 2003, the tax adjustment referred to below. The effect of these restatements resulted in allocations from the
Parent Company to the Guarantor Subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 of $1,438 and $1,483 for general and administrative expenses, respectively, and $219 and $222 for depreciation expense, respectively. The income tax
benefit related to these allocations included in the Guarantor Subsidiaries statement of operations was $590 and $529 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The cumulative impact, net of income taxes, on the Guarantor
Subsidiaries stockholders equity and the Parent Companys investment in subsidiaries for the allocation of corporate costs prior to January 1, 2002 was $1,289.

During 2003, the Parent Company entered into an intercompany agreement, retroactive to January 1, 2002, to charge interest to the Guarantor
Subsidiaries. The retroactive interest recorded in 2003 was $11,277. The Company has corrected the 2003 provision (benefit) for income taxes between the Parent Company only and the Guarantor Subsidiaries financial statements to reflect the tax
consequences of the retroactive interest charge in the year recorded for financial reporting purposes. The amount of this adjustment was a tax benefit of $3,834 included in the Guarantor Subsidiaries 2003 statement of operations.



F-31



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING
BALANCE SHEET (As Restated)

December 31, 2004

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                                     |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | -------- | - | ---------------------- | - | -------- | ------------ |  | - | ------------------ | - |  | - | -------- | -
|                                                     |  | Parent Company Only |          |   | Guarantor Subsidiaries |   |          | Eliminations |  |   | Consolidated Total |  
|ASSETS                                               |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Current assets:                                      |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                            |  | $                   | 29,195   |   |                        | $ | 2,271    |              |  | $ |                   |   |  | $ | 31,466   |  
|Trade and other receivables, net                     |  |                     | 336      |   |                        |   | 2,242    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 2,578    |  
|Inventories                                          |  |                     | 3,376    |   |                        |   | 1,455    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 4,831    |  
|Prepaid rent                                         |  |                     | 1,866    |   |                        |   | 1,723    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 3,589    |  
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets            |  |                     | 1,085    |   |                        |   | 3,273    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 4,358    |  
|Refundable income taxes                              |  |                     | 3,326    |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 3,326    |  
|Deferred income taxes                                |  |                     | 3,618    |   |                        |   | 2,624    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 6,242    |  
|                                                     |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Total current assets                                 |  |                     | 42,802   |   |                        |   | 13,588   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 56,390   |  
|Property and equipment, net                          |  |                     | 97,006   |   |                        |   | 140,532  |              |  |   | (24,049            | ) |  |   | 213,489  |  
|Franchise rights, net                                |  |                     | 90,056   |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 90,056   |  
|Goodwill                                             |  |                     | 1,450    |   |                        |   | 120,791  |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 122,241  |  
|Franchise agreements, net                            |  |                     | 6,480    |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 6,480    |  
|Intercompany receivable (payable)                    |  |                     | 148,424  |   |                        |   | (149,005 | )            |  |   | 581                |   |  |   |         |  
|Investment in subsidiaries                           |  |                     | 14,100   |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   | (14,100            | ) |  |   |         |  
|Deferred income taxes                                |  |                     | 3,198    |   |                        |   | 9,930    |              |  |   | (188               | ) |  |   | 12,940   |  
|Other assets                                         |  |                     | 10,442   |   |                        |   | 5,380    |              |  |   | (1,172             | ) |  |   | 14,650   |  
|                                                     |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Total assets                                         |  | $                   | 413,958  |   |                        | $ | 141,216  |              |  | $ | (38,928            | ) |  | $ | 516,246  |  
|                                                     |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)       |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Current liabilities:                                 |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Current portion of long-term debt                    |  | $                   | 2,343    |   |                        | $ | 268      |              |  | $ |                   |   |  | $ | 2,611    |  
|Accounts payable                                     |  |                     | 7,875    |   |                        |   | 9,706    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 17,581   |  
|Accrued interest                                     |  |                     | 956      |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 956      |  
|Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits          |  |                     | 16,142   |   |                        |   | 8,798    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 24,940   |  
|Accrued bonus to employees and director              |  |                     | 20,860   |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 20,860   |  
|Other liabilities                                    |  |                     | 8,586    |   |                        |   | 5,371    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 13,957   |  
|                                                     |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Total current liabilities                            |  |                     | 56,762   |   |                        |   | 24,143   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 80,905   |  
|Long-term debt, net of current portion               |  |                     | 398,233  |   |                        |   | 381      |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 398,614  |  
|Lease financing obligations                          |  |                     | 48,892   |   |                        |   | 91,313   |              |  |   | (28,490            | ) |  |   | 111,715  |  
|Deferred incomesale-leaseback of real estate        |  |                     | 4,086    |   |                        |   | 1,676    |              |  |   | 2,823              |   |  |   | 8,585    |  
|Accrued postretirement benefits                      |  |                     | 3,504    |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 3,504    |  
|Other liabilities                                    |  |                     | 18,010   |   |                        |   | 10,340   |              |  |   | 102                |   |  |   | 28,452   |  
|                                                     |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Total liabilities                                    |  |                     | 529,487  |   |                        |   | 127,853  |              |  |   | (25,565            | ) |  |   | 631,775  |  
|Commitments and contingencies                        |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Stockholders equity (deficit)                       |  |                     | (115,529 | ) |                        |   | 13,363   |              |  |   | (13,363            | ) |  |   | (115,529 | )
|                                                     |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) |  | $                   | 413,958  |   |                        | $ | 141,216  |              |  | $ | (38,928            | ) |  | $ | 516,246  |  
|                                                     |  |                     |          |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |          |  



F-32



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING
BALANCE SHEET (As Restated)

December 31, 2003

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                              |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | ------- | - | ---------------------- | - | -------- | ------------ |  | - | ------------------ | - |  | - | -------
|                                              |  | Parent Company Only |         |   | Guarantor Subsidiaries |   |          | Eliminations |  |   | Consolidated Total
|ASSETS                                        |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        
|Current assets:                               |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        
|Cash and cash equivalents                     |  | $                   | 708     |   |                        | $ | 1,706    |              |  | $ |                   |   |  | $ | 2,414  
|Trade and other receivables, net              |  |                     | 401     |   |                        |   | 908      |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 1,309  
|Inventories                                   |  |                     | 3,413   |   |                        |   | 1,523    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 4,936  
|Prepaid rent                                  |  |                     | 1,309   |   |                        |   | 1,225    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 2,534  
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets     |  |                     | 1,150   |   |                        |   | 2,893    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 4,043  
|Deferred income taxes                         |  |                     | 2,608   |   |                        |   | 3,678    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 6,286  
|                                              |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        
|Total current assets                          |  |                     | 9,589   |   |                        |   | 11,933   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 21,522 
|Property and equipment, net                   |  |                     | 116,429 |   |                        |   | 146,263  |              |  |   | (24,524            | ) |  |   | 238,168
|Franchise rights, net                         |  |                     | 93,289  |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 93,289 
|Goodwill                                      |  |                     | 1,450   |   |                        |   | 120,791  |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 122,241
|Franchise agreements, net                     |  |                     | 6,959   |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 6,959  
|Intercompany receivable (payable)             |  |                     | 162,465 |   |                        |   | (162,757 | )            |  |   | 292                |   |  |   |       
|Investment in subsidiaries                    |  |                     | 8,812   |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   | (8,812             | ) |  |   |       
|Deferred income taxes                         |  |                     | (741    | ) |                        |   | 7,186    |              |  |   | (15                | ) |  |   | 6,430  
|Other assets                                  |  |                     | 6,340   |   |                        |   | 5,411    |              |  |   | (1,306             | ) |  |   | 10,445 
|                                              |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        
|Total assets                                  |  | $                   | 404,592 |   |                        | $ | 128,827  |              |  | $ | (34,365            | ) |  | $ | 499,054
|                                              |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY          |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        
|Current liabilities:                          |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        
|Current portion of long-term debt             |  | $                   | 13,758  |   |                        | $ | 247      |              |  | $ |                   |   |  | $ | 14,005 
|Accounts payable                              |  |                     | 10,918  |   |                        |   | 6,312    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 17,230 
|Accrued interest                              |  |                     | 1,549   |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 1,549  
|Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits   |  |                     | 8,121   |   |                        |   | 4,719    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 12,840 
|Accrued income taxes payable                  |  |                     | 836     |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 836    
|Other liabilities                             |  |                     | 6,757   |   |                        |   | 8,140    |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 14,897 
|                                              |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        
|Total current liabilities                     |  |                     | 41,939  |   |                        |   | 19,418   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 61,357 
|Long-term debt, net of current portion        |  |                     | 281,176 |   |                        |   | 651      |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 281,827
|Lease financing obligations                   |  |                     | 47,674  |   |                        |   | 87,585   |              |  |   | (28,451            | ) |  |   | 106,808
|Deferred incomesale-leaseback of real estate |  |                     | 2,174   |   |                        |   | 1,502    |              |  |   | 2,976              |   |  |   | 6,652  
|Accrued postretirement benefits               |  |                     | 2,962   |   |                        |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 2,962  
|Other liabilities                             |  |                     | 19,318  |   |                        |   | 10,745   |              |  |   | 36                 |   |  |   | 30,099 
|                                              |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        
|Total liabilities                             |  |                     | 395,243 |   |                        |   | 119,901  |              |  |   | (25,439            | ) |  |   | 489,705
|Commitments and contingencies                 |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        
|Stockholders equity                          |  |                     | 9,349   |   |                        |   | 8,926    |              |  |   | (8,926             | ) |  |   | 9,349  
|                                              |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity    |  | $                   | 404,592 |   |                        | $ | 128,827  |              |  | $ | (34,365            | ) |  | $ | 499,054
|                                              |  |                     |         |   |                        |   |          |              |  |   |                    |   |  |   |        



F-33



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 (As Restated)

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- | - | --------------------- | - | ------------ |  | - | ----------------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                  |  | ParentCompanyOnly |         |   | GuarantorSubsidiaries |   | Eliminations |  |   | ConsolidatedTotal |  
|Revenues:                                                                         |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Restaurant sales                                                                  |  | $                 | 369,837 |   |                       | $ | 326,506      |  | $ |                  |   |  | $ | 696,343 |  
|Franchise royalty revenues and fees                                               |  |                   |        |   |                       |   | 1,536        |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 1,536   |  
|                                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Total revenues                                                                    |  |                   | 369,837 |   |                       |   | 328,042      |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 697,879 |  
|                                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Cost and expenses:                                                                |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Cost of sales                                                                     |  |                   | 103,203 |   |                       |   | 99,421       |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 202,624 |  
|Restaurant wages and related expenses                                             |  |                   | 117,650 |   |                       |   | 89,082       |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 206,732 |  
|Restaurant rent expense                                                           |  |                   | 21,809  |   |                       |   | 10,455       |  |   | 2,342             |   |  |   | 34,606  |  
|Other restaurant operating expenses                                               |  |                   | 52,712  |   |                       |   | 40,179       |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 92,891  |  
|Advertising expense                                                               |  |                   | 14,489  |   |                       |   | 10,222       |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 24,711  |  
|General and administrative (including stock-based compensation expense of $1,818) |  |                   | 21,033  |   |                       |   | 22,545       |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 43,578  |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                     |  |                   | 23,186  |   |                       |   | 15,810       |  |   | (475              | ) |  |   | 38,521  |  
|Impairment losses                                                                 |  |                   | 1,544   |   |                       |   |             |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 1,544   |  
|Bonus to employees and director                                                   |  |                   | 14,817  |   |                       |   | 6,043        |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 20,860  |  
|Other expense                                                                     |  |                   | 2,320   |   |                       |   |             |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 2,320   |  
|                                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Total operating expenses                                                          |  |                   | 372,763 |   |                       |   | 293,757      |  |   | 1,867             |   |  |   | 668,387 |  
|                                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Income (loss) from operations                                                     |  |                   | (2,926  | ) |                       |   | 34,285       |  |   | (1,867            | ) |  |   | 29,492  |  
|Interest expense                                                                  |  |                   | 28,615  |   |                       |   | 9,370        |  |   | (2,602            | ) |  |   | 35,383  |  
|Loss on extinguishment of debt                                                    |  |                   | 8,913   |   |                       |   |             |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 8,913   |  
|Intercompany interest allocations                                                 |  |                   | (18,225 | ) |                       |   | 18,225       |  |   |                  |   |  |   |        |  
|                                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Income (loss) before income taxes                                                 |  |                   | (22,229 | ) |                       |   | 6,690        |  |   | 735               |   |  |   | (14,804 | )
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                                              |  |                   | (8,857  | ) |                       |   | 2,253        |  |   | (116              | ) |  |   | (6,720  | )
|Equity income from subsidiaries                                                   |  |                   | 5,288   |   |                       |   |             |  |   | (5,288            | ) |  |   |        |  
|                                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Net income (loss)                                                                 |  | $                 | (8,084  | ) |                       | $ | 4,437        |  | $ | (4,437            | ) |  | $ | (8,084  | )
|                                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  



F-34



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (As Restated)

Year Ended December 31, 2003

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- | - | --------------------- | - | ------- | ------------ |  | - | ----------------- | - |  | - | -------
|                                                                                |  | ParentCompanyOnly |         |   | GuarantorSubsidiaries |   |         | Eliminations |  |   | ConsolidatedTotal
|Revenues:                                                                       |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Restaurant sales                                                                |  | $                 | 353,310 |   |                       | $ | 290,269 |              |  | $ |                  |   |  | $ | 643,579
|Franchise royalty revenues and fees                                             |  |                   |        |   |                       |   | 1,406   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 1,406  
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Total revenues                                                                  |  |                   | 353,310 |   |                       |   | 291,675 |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 644,985
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Costs and expenses:                                                             |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Cost of sales                                                                   |  |                   | 94,360  |   |                       |   | 86,822  |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 181,182
|Restaurant wages and related expenses                                           |  |                   | 113,996 |   |                       |   | 80,319  |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 194,315
|Restaurant rent expense                                                         |  |                   | 20,353  |   |                       |   | 9,419   |              |  |   | 1,317             |   |  |   | 31,089 
|Other restaurant operating expenses                                             |  |                   | 52,302  |   |                       |   | 37,578  |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 89,880 
|Advertising expense                                                             |  |                   | 14,923  |   |                       |   | 12,428  |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 27,351 
|General and administrative (including stock-based compensation expense of $253) |  |                   | 18,588  |   |                       |   | 17,984  |              |  |   | 804               |   |  |   | 37,376 
|Depreciation and amortization                                                   |  |                   | 26,010  |   |                       |   | 14,472  |              |  |   | (254              | ) |  |   | 40,228 
|Impairment losses                                                               |  |                   | 706     |   |                       |   | 3,445   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 4,151  
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Total operating expenses                                                        |  |                   | 341,238 |   |                       |   | 262,467 |              |  |   | 1,867             |   |  |   | 605,572
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Income from operations                                                          |  |                   | 12,072  |   |                       |   | 29,208  |              |  |   | (1,867            | ) |  |   | 39,413 
|Interest expense                                                                |  |                   | 30,742  |   |                       |   | 8,062   |              |  |   | (1,470            | ) |  |   | 37,334 
|Intercompany interest allocations                                               |  |                   | (29,502 | ) |                       |   | 29,502  |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   |       
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Income (loss) before income taxes                                               |  |                   | 10,832  |   |                       |   | (8,356  | )            |  |   | (397              | ) |  |   | 2,079  
|Provision for income taxes                                                      |  |                   | 17      |   |                       |   | 937     |              |  |   | (213              | ) |  |   | 741    
|Equity loss from subsidiaries                                                   |  |                   | (9,477  | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   | 9,477             |   |  |   |       
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Net income (loss)                                                               |  | $                 | 1,338   |   |                       | $ | (9,293  | )            |  | $ | 9,293             |   |  | $ | 1,338  
|                                                                                |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        



F-35



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (As Restated)

Year Ended December 31, 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                                                               |  |                   |         |   |                        |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------- | ------- | - | ---------------------- | - | ------------ |  | - | ----------------- | - |  | - | -------
|                                                                               |  | ParentCompanyOnly |         |   | Guarantor Subsidiaries |   | Eliminations |  |   | ConsolidatedTotal
|Revenues:                                                                      |  |                   |         |   |                        |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Restaurant sales                                                               |  | $                 | 380,119 |   |                        | $ | 275,426      |  | $ |                  |   |  | $ | 655,545
|Franchise royalty revenues and fees                                            |  |                   |        |   |                        |   | 1,482        |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 1,482  
|                                                                               |  |                   |         |   |                        |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Total revenues                                                                 |  |                   | 380,119 |   |                        |   | 276,908      |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 657,027
|                                                                               |  |                   |         |   |                        |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Costs and expenses:                                                            |  |                   |         |   |                        |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Cost of sales                                                                  |  |                   | 101,851 |   |                        |   | 82,125       |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 183,976
|Restaurant wages and related expenses                                          |  |                   | 118,754 |   |                        |   | 77,504       |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 196,258
|Restaurant rent expense                                                        |  |                   | 21,875  |   |                        |   | 9,050        |  |   | 15                |   |  |   | 30,940 
|Other restaurant operating expenses                                            |  |                   | 54,547  |   |                        |   | 32,788       |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 87,335 
|Advertising expense                                                            |  |                   | 16,831  |   |                        |   | 11,210       |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 28,041 
|General and administrative (including stock-based compensation income of $151) |  |                   | 20,846  |   |                        |   | 15,613       |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 36,459 
|Depreciation and amortization                                                  |  |                   | 26,246  |   |                        |   | 13,191       |  |   | (3                | ) |  |   | 39,434 
|Impairment losses                                                              |  |                   | 1,033   |   |                        |   | 252          |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 1,285  
|                                                                               |  |                   |         |   |                        |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Total operating expenses                                                       |  |                   | 361,983 |   |                        |   | 241,733      |  |   | 12                |   |  |   | 603,728
|                                                                               |  |                   |         |   |                        |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Income from operations                                                         |  |                   | 18,136  |   |                        |   | 35,175       |  |   | (12               | ) |  |   | 53,299 
|Interest expense                                                               |  |                   | 32,755  |   |                        |   | 6,592        |  |   | (18               | ) |  |   | 39,329 
|Intercompany interest allocations                                              |  |                   | (6,948  | ) |                        |   | 6,948        |  |   |                  |   |  |   |       
|                                                                               |  |                   |         |   |                        |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Income (loss) before income taxes                                              |  |                   | (7,671  | ) |                        |   | 21,635       |  |   | 6                 |   |  |   | 13,970 
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                                           |  |                   | (2,618  | ) |                        |   | 7,611        |  |   | (64               | ) |  |   | 4,929  
|Equity income from subsidiaries                                                |  |                   | 14,094  |   |                        |   |             |  |   | (14,094           | ) |  |   |       
|                                                                               |  |                   |         |   |                        |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        
|Net income                                                                     |  | $                 | 9,041   |   |                        | $ | 14,024       |  | $ | (14,024           | ) |  | $ | 9,041  
|                                                                               |  |                   |         |   |                        |   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |        



F-36



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (As Restated)

Year Ended December 31, 2004

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                                                                           |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------- | -------- | - | --------------------- | - | ------- | ------------ |  | - | ----------------- | - |  | - | -------- | -
|                                                                                           |  | ParentCompanyOnly |          |   | GuarantorSubsidiaries |   |         | Eliminations |  |   | ConsolidatedTotal |  
|Cash flows provided from operating activities:                                             |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|Net income (loss)                                                                          |  | $                 | (8,084   | ) |                       | $ | 4,437   |              |  | $ | (4,437            | ) |  | $ | (8,084   | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided from operating activities: |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|(Gain)/loss on disposal of property and equipment                                          |  |                   | (288     | ) |                       |   | 112     |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (176     | )
|Stock-based compensation expense                                                           |  |                   | 35       |   |                       |   | 1,783   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 1,818    |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                              |  |                   | 23,186   |   |                       |   | 15,810  |              |  |   | (475              | ) |  |   | 38,521   |  
|Amortization of deferred financing costs                                                   |  |                   | 1,396    |   |                       |   | 265     |              |  |   | (134              | ) |  |   | 1,527    |  
|Amortization of unearned purchase discounts                                                |  |                   | (2,154   | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (2,154   | )
|Amortization of deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions                            |  |                   | (205     | ) |                       |   | (100    | )            |  |   | (153              | ) |  |   | (458     | )
|Accretion of interest on lease financing obligations                                       |  |                   | (33      | ) |                       |   | 478     |              |  |   | (39               | ) |  |   | 406      |  
|Impairment losses                                                                          |  |                   | 1,544    |   |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 1,544    |  
|Loss on extinguishment of debt                                                             |  |                   | 8,913    |   |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 8,913    |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                                      |  |                   | (7,898   | ) |                       |   | 1,259   |              |  |   | 173               |   |  |   | (6,466   | )
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities                                                |  |                   | 36,954   |   |                       |   | (18,199 | )            |  |   | 5,065             |   |  |   | 23,820   |  
|                                                                                           |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|Net cash provided from operating activities                                                |  |                   | 53,366   |   |                       |   | 5,845   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 59,211   |  
|                                                                                           |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|Cash flows used for investing activities:                                                  |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|Capital expenditures:                                                                      |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|New restaurant development                                                                 |  |                   | (1,053   | ) |                       |   | (9,355  | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (10,408  | )
|Lessor reimbursement                                                                       |  |                   |         |   |                       |   | 754     |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 754      |  
|                                                                                           |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|Net new restaurant development                                                             |  |                   | (1,053   | ) |                       |   | (8,601  | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (9,654   | )
|Restaurant remodeling                                                                      |  |                   | (845     | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (845     | )
|Other restaurant expenditures                                                              |  |                   | (2,913   | ) |                       |   | (4,590  | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (7,503   | )
|Corporate and restaurant information systems                                               |  |                   | (734     | ) |                       |   | (337    | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (1,071   | )
|                                                                                           |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|Net capital expenditures                                                                   |  |                   | (5,545   | ) |                       |   | (13,528 | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (19,073  | )
|Properties purchased for sale-leaseback                                                    |  |                   | (1,574   | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (1,574   | )
|Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions                                                  |  |                   | 6,263    |   |                       |   | 4,721   |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   | 10,984   |  
|Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment                                       |  |                   | 488      |   |                       |   | 686     |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 1,174    |  
|                                                                                           |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|Net cash used for investing activities                                                     |  |                   | (368     | ) |                       |   | (8,121  | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (8,489   | )
|                                                                                           |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|Cash flows provided from (used for) financing activities:                                  |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|Payments on revolving credit facility, net                                                 |  |                   | (600     | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (600     | )
|Scheduled principal payments on term loans                                                 |  |                   | (10,125  | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (10,125  | )
|Proceeds from issuance of debt                                                             |  |                   | 400,000  |   |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 400,000  |  
|Tender and redemption of 91/2% senior subordinated notes                                   |  |                   | (175,756 | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (175,756 | )
|Repayment of borrowings under previous credit facility                                     |  |                   | (113,375 | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (113,375 | )
|Financing costs associated with issuance of debt and lease financing obligations           |  |                   | (8,853   | ) |                       |   | (160    | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (9,013   | )
|Proceeds from lease financing obligations                                                  |  |                   | 1,250    |   |                       |   | 3,250   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 4,500    |  
|Dividends paid                                                                             |  |                   | (116,794 | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (116,794 | )
|Payments on other notes payable, net                                                       |  |                   | (117     | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (117     | )
|Principal payments on capital leases                                                       |  |                   | (141     | ) |                       |   | (249    | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (390     | )
|                                                                                           |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities                                     |  |                   | (24,511  | ) |                       |   | 2,841   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (21,670  | )
|                                                                                           |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                                                  |  |                   | 28,487   |   |                       |   | 565     |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 29,052   |  
|Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year                                               |  |                   | 708      |   |                       |   | 1,706   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 2,414    |  
|                                                                                           |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  
|Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                                                     |  | $                 | 29,195   |   |                       | $ | 2,271   |              |  | $ |                  |   |  | $ | 31,466   |  
|                                                                                           |  |                   |          |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |          |  



F-37



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (As Restated)

Year Ended December 31, 2003

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                                                                                      |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- | - | --------------------- | - | ------- | ------------ |  | - | ----------------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                                      |  | ParentCompanyOnly |         |   | GuarantorSubsidiaries |   |         | Eliminations |  |   | ConsolidatedTotal |  
|Cash flows provided from (used for) operating activities:                                             |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Net income (loss)                                                                                     |  | $                 | 1,338   |   |                       | $ | (9,293  | )            |  | $ | 9,293             |   |  | $ | 1,338   |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided from (used for) operating activities: |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|(Gain)/loss on disposal of property and equipment                                                     |  |                   | (837    | ) |                       |   | 451     |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (386    | )
|Stock-based compensation expense                                                                      |  |                   |        |   |                       |   | 253     |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 253     |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                                         |  |                   | 26,010  |   |                       |   | 14,472  |              |  |   | (254              | ) |  |   | 40,228  |  
|Amortization of deferred financing costs                                                              |  |                   | 1,414   |   |                       |   | 205     |              |  |   | (79               | ) |  |   | 1,540   |  
|Amortization of unearned purchase discounts                                                           |  |                   | (2,146  | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (2,146  | )
|Amortization of deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions                                       |  |                   | (63     | ) |                       |   | (27     | )            |  |   | (90               | ) |  |   | (180    | )
|Accretion of interest on lease financing obligations                                                  |  |                   | 35      |   |                       |   | 429     |              |  |   | (21               | ) |  |   | 443     |  
|Impairment losses                                                                                     |  |                   | 706     |   |                       |   | 3,445   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 4,151   |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                                                 |  |                   | (2,625  | ) |                       |   | 1,454   |              |  |   | 15                |   |  |   | (1,156  | )
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities                                                           |  |                   | 37,194  |   |                       |   | (26,066 | )            |  |   | (8,864            | ) |  |   | 2,264   |  
|                                                                                                      |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Net cash provided from (used for) operating activities                                                |  |                   | 61,026  |   |                       |   | (14,677 | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 46,349  |  
|                                                                                                      |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash flows provided from (used for) investing activities:                                             |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Capital expenditures:                                                                                 |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|New restaurant development                                                                            |  |                   | (2,873  | ) |                       |   | (15,833 | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (18,706 | )
|Restaurant remodeling                                                                                 |  |                   | (3,170  | ) |                       |   | (147    | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (3,317  | )
|Other restaurant expenditures                                                                         |  |                   | (2,061  | ) |                       |   | (4,883  | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (6,944  | )
|Corporate and restaurant information systems                                                          |  |                   | (850    | ) |                       |   | (554    | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (1,404  | )
|                                                                                                      |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Total capital expenditures                                                                            |  |                   | (8,954  | ) |                       |   | (21,417 | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (30,371 | )
|Properties purchased for sale-leaseback                                                               |  |                   |        |   |                       |   | (3,149  | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (3,149  | )
|Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions                                                             |  |                   | 7,433   |   |                       |   | 14,976  |              |  |   | 21,771            |   |  |   | 44,180  |  
|Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment                                                  |  |                   | 1,251   |   |                       |   | 2,670   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 3,921   |  
|                                                                                                      |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Net cash provided from (used for) investing activities                                                |  |                   | (270    | ) |                       |   | (6,920  | )            |  |   | 21,771            |   |  |   | 14,581  |  
|                                                                                                      |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash flows provided from (used for) financing activities:                                             |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Payments on revolving credit facility, net                                                            |  |                   | (52,200 | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (52,200 | )
|Scheduled principal payments on term loans                                                            |  |                   | (11,000 | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (11,000 | )
|Financing costs associated with lease financing obligations                                           |  |                   | (186    | ) |                       |   | (1,159  | )            |  |   | 1,159             |   |  |   | (186    | )
|Proceeds from lease financing obligations                                                             |  |                   | 3,625   |   |                       |   | 22,930  |              |  |   | (22,930           | ) |  |   | 3,625   |  
|Payments on other notes payable, net                                                                  |  |                   | (847    | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (847    | )
|Principal payments on capital leases                                                                  |  |                   | (155    | ) |                       |   | (291    | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (446    | )
|                                                                                                      |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities                                                |  |                   | (60,763 | ) |                       |   | 21,480  |              |  |   | (21,771           | ) |  |   | (61,054 | )
|                                                                                                      |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                                                             |  |                   | (7      | ) |                       |   | (117    | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (124    | )
|Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year                                                          |  |                   | 715     |   |                       |   | 1,823   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 2,538   |  
|                                                                                                      |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                                                                |  | $                 | 708     |   |                       | $ | 1,706   |              |  | $ |                  |   |  | $ | 2,414   |  
|                                                                                                      |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  



F-38



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

CONSOLIDATING
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (As Restated)

Year Ended December 31, 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                                                                    |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- | - | --------------------- | - | ------- | ------------ |  | - | ----------------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                    |  | ParentCompanyOnly |         |   | GuarantorSubsidiaries |   |         | Eliminations |  |   | ConsolidatedTotal |  
|Cash flows provided from operating activities:                                      |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Net income                                                                          |  | $                 | 9,041   |   |                       | $ | 14,024  |              |  | $ | (14,024           | ) |  | $ | 9,041   |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided from operating activities: |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Loss on disposal of property and equipment                                          |  |                   |        |   |                       |   | 24      |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 24      |  
|Stock-based compensation income                                                     |  |                   | (151    | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (151    | )
|Depreciation and amortization                                                       |  |                   | 26,246  |   |                       |   | 13,191  |              |  |   | (3                | ) |  |   | 39,434  |  
|Amortization of deferred financing costs                                            |  |                   | 1,394   |   |                       |   | 135     |              |  |   | (1                | ) |  |   | 1,528   |  
|Amortization of unearned purchase discounts                                         |  |                   | (2,155  | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (2,155  | )
|Amortization of deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions                     |  |                   | (21     | ) |                       |   | 2       |              |  |   | (2                | ) |  |   | (21     | )
|Accretion of interest on lease financing obligations                                |  |                   | 60      |   |                       |   | 418     |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 478     |  
|Impairment losses                                                                   |  |                   | 1,033   |   |                       |   | 252     |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 1,285   |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                               |  |                   | (1,611  | ) |                       |   | 6,499   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 4,888   |  
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities                                         |  |                   | (9,246  | ) |                       |   | (4,941  | )            |  |   | 14,030            |   |  |   | (157    | )
|                                                                                    |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Net cash provided from operating activities                                         |  |                   | 24,590  |   |                       |   | 29,604  |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 54,194  |  
|                                                                                    |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash flows used for investing activities:                                           |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Capital expenditures:                                                               |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|New restaurant development                                                          |  |                   | (9,113  | ) |                       |   | (18,352 | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (27,465 | )
|Restaurant remodeling                                                               |  |                   | (12,699 | ) |                       |   | (3,555  | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (16,254 | )
|Other restaurant expenditures                                                       |  |                   | (4,919  | ) |                       |   | (4,099  | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (9,018  | )
|Corporate and restaurant information systems                                        |  |                   | (651    | ) |                       |   | (767    | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (1,418  | )
|                                                                                    |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Total capital expenditures                                                          |  |                   | (27,382 | ) |                       |   | (26,773 | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (54,155 | )
|Properties purchased for sale-leaseback                                             |  |                   | (925    | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (925    | )
|Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions                                           |  |                   | 2,097   |   |                       |   | 6,338   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 8,435   |  
|Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment                                |  |                   | 9       |   |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 9       |  
|                                                                                    |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Net cash used for investing activities                                              |  |                   | (26,201 | ) |                       |   | (20,435 | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (46,636 | )
|                                                                                    |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash flows provided from (used for) financing activities:                           |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Payments on revolving credit facility, net                                          |  |                   | (2,700  | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (2,700  | )
|Scheduled principal payments on term loans                                          |  |                   | (8,500  | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (8,500  | )
|Financing costs associated with lease financing obligations                         |  |                   | (233    | ) |                       |   | (63     | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (296    | )
|Proceeds from lease financing obligations                                           |  |                   | 4,250   |   |                       |   | 1,350   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 5,600   |  
|Payments on other notes payable, net                                                |  |                   | (978    | ) |                       |   |        |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (978    | )
|Principal payments on capital leases                                                |  |                   | (284    | ) |                       |   | (267    | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (551    | )
|Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions                                           |  |                   | 9,850   |   |                       |   | (9,850  | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   |        |  
|                                                                                    |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities                              |  |                   | 1,405   |   |                       |   | (8,830  | )            |  |   |                  |   |  |   | (7,425  | )
|                                                                                    |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                                |  |                   | (206    | ) |                       |   | 339     |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 133     |  
|Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year                                        |  |                   | 921     |   |                       |   | 1,484   |              |  |   |                  |   |  |   | 2,405   |  
|                                                                                    |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                                              |  | $                 | 715     |   |                       | $ | 1,823   |              |  | $ |                  |   |  | $ | 2,538   |  
|                                                                                    |  |                   |         |   |                       |   |         |              |  |   |                   |   |  |   |         |  



F-39



---

##### Table of Contents

Note 18. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (1)



|                  |  |                      |         |                      |         |         |                     |  |             |                      |   |                      |   |                     |  |                      |         |                      |   |                     |  |                      |         |  |                     |         |  |   |         |  |   |         |      |  |   |         |     
|----------------- |  | -------------------- | ------- | -------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------------------- |  | ----------- | -------------------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------- | -------------------- | - | ------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------- |  | ------------------- | ------- |  | - | ------- |  | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | ----
|                  |  | Quarter Ended        |        
|2004              |  | March 31             |         |                      | June 30 |         | September 30        |  | December 31 |                     
|                  |  | AsPreviouslyReported |         | AsPreviouslyRestated |         |         | AsCurrentlyRestated |  |             | AsPreviouslyReported |   | AsPreviouslyRestated |   | AsCurrentlyRestated |  | AsPreviouslyReported |         | AsPreviouslyRestated |   | AsCurrentlyRestated |  | AsPreviouslyReported |         |  | AsCurrentlyRestated |        
|Total revenues    |  | $                    | 156,900 |                      | $       | 156,900 |                     |  | $           | 156,900              |   |                      | $ | 177,923             |  | $                    | 177,923 |                      | $ | 177,923             |  | $                    | 178,162 |  | $                   | 178,162 |  | $ | 178,162 |  | $ | 184,894 |      |  | $ | 184,894 |     
|Gross profit (2)  |  |                      | 29,087  |                      |         | 29,019  |                     |  |             | 29,288               |   |                      |   | 35,304              |  |                      | 35,276  |                      |   | 35,549              |  |                      | 34,549  |  |                     | 34,456  |  |   | 34,732  |  |   | 36,471  |      |  |   | 36,746  |     
|Net income (loss) |  |                      | 379     |                      |         | (47     | )                   |  |             | (217                 | ) |                      |   | 4,053               |  |                      | 2,757   |                      |   | 2,632               |  |                      | 2,584   |  |                     | 1,769   |  |   | 1,615   |  |   | (11,684 | )(3) |  |   | (12,114 | )(3)



|                  |  |                      |         |   |                      |   |              |                     |             |   |                      |   |                      |   |                     |  |                      |         |                      |   |                     |  |                      |         |                      |   |                     |  |   |         |  |   |         |  |   |         |  |   |        
|----------------- |  | -------------------- | ------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------------ | ------------------- | ----------- | - | -------------------- | - | -------------------- | - | ------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------- | -------------------- | - | ------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------- | -------------------- | - | ------------------- |  | - | ------- |  | - | ------- |  | - | ------- |  | - | -------
|                  |  | Quarter Ended       
|2003              |  | March 31             |         |   | June 30              |   | September 30 |                     | December 31
|                  |  | AsPreviouslyReported |         |   | AsPreviouslyRestated |   |              | AsCurrentlyRestated |             |   | AsPreviouslyReported |   | AsPreviouslyRestated |   | AsCurrentlyRestated |  | AsPreviouslyReported |         | AsPreviouslyRestated |   | AsCurrentlyRestated |  | AsPreviouslyReported |         | AsPreviouslyRestated |   | AsCurrentlyRestated
|Total revenues    |  | $                    | 152,240 |   |                      | $ | 152,240      |                     |             | $ | 152,240              |   |                      | $ | 165,621             |  | $                    | 165,621 |                      | $ | 165,621             |  | $                    | 166,195 |                      | $ | 166,195             |  | $ | 166,195 |  | $ | 160,929 |  | $ | 160,929 |  | $ | 160,929
|Gross profit (2)  |  |                      | 26,312  |   |                      |   | 26,206       |                     |             |   | 26,328               |   |                      |   | 32,738              |  |                      | 32,651  |                      |   | 32,799              |  |                      | 32,208  |                      |   | 32,136              |  |   | 32,308  |  |   | 29,616  |  |   | 29,554  |  |   | 29,733 
|Net income (loss) |  |                      | (1,340  | ) |                      |   | (1,475       | )                   |             |   | (1,463               | ) |                      |   | 2,323               |  |                      | 2,336   |                      |   | 2,184               |  |                      | 795     |                      |   | 737                 |  |   | 572     |  |   | 590     |  |   | 221     |  |   | 45     

---

|(1) | See Note 2 regarding the restatement of previously issued financial statements.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Gross profit is defined as total revenues less cost of sales, restaurant wages and related expenses, restaurant rent expense, other restaurant operating expenses and advertising
expenses.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a $20.9 million non-recurring bonus payment including taxes (See Note 11) and incurred an $8.9 million loss on early
extinguishment of debt associated with the December 2004 refinancing (See Note 7).
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-40



---

##### Table of Contents

CARROLS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE IIVALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

(in thousands of dollars)



|                                               |  |                              |       |                            |   |                         |        |   |            |        |  |                       |      |      |  |   |      
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ----- | -------------------------- | - | ----------------------- | ------ | - | ---------- | ------ |  | --------------------- | ---- | ---- |  | - | -----
|Column A                                       |  | Column B                     |       | Col. C                     |   |                         | Col. D |   |            | Col. E
|Description                                    |  | Balance atBeginningof Period |       | Chargedto CostsandExpenses |   | Chargedto otheraccounts |        |   | Deductions |        |  | Balanceat EndofPeriod
|Year ended December 31, 2004:                  |  |                              |       |                            |   |                         |        |   |            |        |  |                       |      |      |  |   |      
|Reserve for doubtful trade accounts receivable |  | $                            | 94    |                            | $ |                        |        | $ |           |        |  | $                     | (13  | )(a) |  | $ | 81   
|Reserve for note receivable                    |  |                              | 1,184 |                            |   |                        |        |   |           |        |  |                       | (25  | )    |  |   | 1,159
|Year ended December 31, 2003:                  |  |                              |       |                            |   |                         |        |   |            |        |  |                       |      |      |  |   |      
|Reserve for doubtful trade accounts receivable |  | $                            | 128   |                            | $ |                        |        | $ |           |        |  | $                     | (34  | )(a) |  | $ | 94   
|Reserve for note receivable                    |  |                              |      |                            |   |                        |        |   | 1,200      | (b)    |  |                       | (16  | )    |  |   | 1,184
|Year ended December 31, 2002:                  |  |                              |       |                            |   |                         |        |   |            |        |  |                       |      |      |  |   |      
|Reserve for doubtful trade accounts receivable |  | $                            | 128   |                            | $ |                        |        | $ |           |        |  | $                     |     |      |  | $ | 128  
|Reserve for note receivable                    |  |                              | 238   |                            |   |                        |        |   |           |        |  |                       | (238 | )    |  |   |     

---

|(a) | Represents write-offs of accounts.
|--- | ----------------------------------

|(b) | Represents the establishment of a reserve for the total amount of a note receivable at the date of its issuance.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-41



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized
on the 30th day of June 2006.



CARROLS CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ ALAN VITULIAlan Vituli,Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



|                                                  |  |                                                             |  |              
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------
|Signature                                         |  | Title                                                       |  | Date         
|                                                  |  |                                                            
|/s/ ALAN VITULI Alan Vituli                       |  | Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |  | June 30, 2006
|                                                  |  |                                                            
|/s/ DANIEL T. ACCORDINO Daniel T. Accordino       |  | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director             |  | June 30, 2006
|                                                  |  |                                                            
|/s/ PAUL R. FLANDERS Paul R. Flanders             |  | Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer      |  | June 30, 2006
|                                                  |  |                                                            
|/s/ TIMOTHY J. LALONDE Timothy J. LaLonde         |  | Vice President  Controller                                 |  | June 30, 2006
|                                                  |  |                                                            
|/s/ BENJAMIN D. CHERESKIN Benjamin D. Chereskin   |  | Director                                                    |  | June 30, 2006
|                                                  |  |                                                            
|/s/ ROBIN P. SELATI Robin P. Selati               |  | Director                                                    |  | June 30, 2006
|                                                  |  |                                                            
|/s/ CLAYTON E. WILHITE Clayton E. Wilhite         |  | Director                                                    |  | June 30, 2006
|                                                  |  |                                                            
|/s/ BRIAN F. GLEASON Brian F. Gleason             |  | Director                                                    |  | June 30, 2006
|                                                  |  |                                                            
|/s/ OLASENI ADEYEMI SONUGA Olaseni Adeyemi Sonuga |  | Director                                                    |  | June 30, 2006