alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LANCE R. LEFLEUR ROBERT J. BENTLEY
DIRECTOR GOVERNOR 

### Alabama Department of Environmental Management

adem.alabama.gov 1400 Coliseum Blvd. 36110-2400 ■ Post Office Box 301463

Montgomery, Alabama 36130-1463 r_, (334) 271-7700 ■ FAX (334) 271-7950 rn
_ C C; 

## April 11, 2014

r- O

_ 

## The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20460 

# ^ L'ear Ms. McCarthy: EPA will soon be preparing a guidance document for implementing Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act for the electric utility sector. ADEM has been made aware of an issue regarding whether certain "outside the plant boundary" activities can be considered toward GHG emission reductions, if such flexibility is to be utilized in compliance plans. ADEM is asking that:

If EPA proceeds with preparing a guidance document, and, If the guidance document or subsequent actions provide for compliance credits from "outside the plant boundary" progranis, and, If Alabama or other States choose to claim compliance credits from such programs, then, ADEM recommends that EPA provide for and quantify credits from waste-to-energy (WTE) plants and from recycling programs. Witl: respect to WTE facilities, EPA has published a stuuy which conciudes that each ton of municipal solid waste not landfilled as a result of being processed through a WTE facility prevents the equivalent release of a ton of CO2. ( www. epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/municipal/wte/airem litm#7 )

Birmingham Branch Decatur Branch Mobile Branch Mobile-Coastal 110 Vulcan Road 2715 Sandlin Road, S. W. 2204 Perimeter Road 4171 Commanders Drive Birmingham, AL 35209-4702 Decatur, AL 35603-1333 Mobile, AL 36615-1131 Mobile, AL 36615-1421 (205) 942-6168 (256) 353-1713 1 (251) 450-3400 (251) 432-6533 (205) 941-1603 (FAX) (256) 340-9359 (FAX) V I f '` (251) 479-2593 (FAX) (251) 432-6598 (FAX)

## Similarly, recycling a significant percentage of a ton of MSW, consisting mainly of paper with

some additional organics, should generate credits using the same assumptions, i.e., that the waste would not then form methane in a landfill and would not generate CO2 if the methane were flared or used as fuel. Please let me know if clarification is needed.

Sincer 

# ^
Lance R. LeFleur, Director
CC: Janet McCabe, Acting Assistant Administrator Joe Goffman, Senior Counsel

## „OOo° 

# MN^

f+7 ^ • LU I 

### 20a0 = 

## I^e4A < a ^ N —

^ - ^.

CK N —

J ^^ S ^^iiNn o a g

__ rx = 

# O ' ^ ^ -

ssvia w a31aOS32id p U 

### =



## Q Q ^= z = 

# zo3 = U co 

# ^ N 

# U z L` 1"^ 

## ¢Fy>^ ►^ Q ^t' 

### fL- WzzU v > 

### C4o^o .^. ^



# °w0.z

............ •#^ 3 ^ ^ 0 N N_ E E 0 V r C d E w m m 10 A ^ C A ^ O rD C m m ,^ 

### E! ^ ^ 

# W ^^s

O m o j x ¢ C 

# m ^ W ^ ^ V 

# © EE o

^ O ^ ^ C m O 10 Q a

a -,?!
# C_2016202EN.01003101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/31

---

Article 26

(ex Article 13 TEU)

(ex Article 13 TEU)

1.   The European Council shall identify the Union's strategic interests, determine the objectives of and define general guidelines for the common foreign and security policy, including for matters with defence implications. It shall adopt the necessary decisions.

If international developments so require, the President of the European Council shall convene an extraordinary meeting of the European Council in order to define the strategic lines of the Union's policy in the face of such developments.

2.   The Council shall frame the common foreign and security policy and take the decisions necessary for defining and implementing it on the basis of the general guidelines and strategic lines defined by the European Council.

The Council and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy shall ensure the unity, consistency and effectiveness of action by the Union.

3.   The common foreign and security policy shall be put into effect by the High Representative and by the Member States, using national and Union resources.

---
#### Saliem Attia, Plaintiff *v.*William Koelling et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Onondaga County,

May 25, 1959.

*Bond, Schoeneck & King*for Charles H. Auer, defendant.

*Shaffer <& Leverton*for plaintiff.

*501Carl W. Peterson, J.

The defendant, Charles H. Auer, by this motion asks for an order of preclusion.

From the affidavits submitted to the court, it appears that seven months elapsed between the service of the bill of particulars and the making of this motion.

The demand for a bill of particulars requires that the plaintiff furnish 17 different items of information. Buie 116 of the Buies of Civil Practice provides that in personal injury actions certain particulars may be required, and these are listed in subdivisions (a) through (i). Subdivision (j) of rule 116 of the Buies of Civil Practice provides that additional information may be required from a litigant in personal injury actions in the discretion of the court.

An examination of the demand for the bill of particulars and the bill of particulars furnished by the plaintiff in this action indicates that the plaintiff has furnished to the defendant all the information specifically required under the subdivision referred to in rule 116 of the Buies of Civil Practice, but in furnishing the bill of particulars, the plaintiff labeled demands 9 through 17 as improper.

The court is in accord with the position of the plaintiff. It appears to the court that demands 9 through 17 constitute demands for information beyond that required by law and beyond that which a fair exercise of judicial discretion should permit. The plaintiff has furnished a bill of particulars sufficient to meet the requirements of statute and sufficient to permit the defendant to prepare for trial.

Further, as a matter of procedure, this motion to preclude having been made more than seven months after the bill of particulars was served, is not timely made.

It, therefore, follows that the motion to preclude should be denied, without costs.

Submit order accordingly.
133 P.3d 1210

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

May 2, 2006

24458

#### Takaki v. Cambra

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Cornerstone Centennial Plaque Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### State v. Joseph.

27001

02/17/2006

Denied

109 Hawai'i 578, 128 P.3d 795
# EUR-Lex - 21999D0513(04) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 21999D0513(04)

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 68/98 of 4 July 1998 amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 123 , 13/05/1999 P. 0064 - 0064 *

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 68/98

of 4 July 1998

amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as adjusted by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 24/98 of 27 March 1998(1);

Whereas Decision No 165 of 30 June 1997 on the forms necessary for the application of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 and (EEC) No 574/72 (E 128 and E 128B)(2), adopted by the Administrative Commission of the European Communities on Social Security for Migrant Workers, is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 3.48 (Decision No 164) in Annex VI to the Agreement: "3.49 397 D 0823: Decision No 165 of 30 June 1997 on the forms necessary for the application of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 and (EEC) No 574/72 (E 128 and E 128B) (OJ L 341, 12.12.1997, p. 61)."

Article 2

The texts of Decision No 165 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, which are annexed to the respective language versions of this Decision, are authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 July 1998, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA section of, and in the EEA supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels, 4 July 1998.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

F. BARBASO

(1) OJ L 310, 19.11.1998, p. 4.

(2) OJ L 341, 12.12.1997, p. 61.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Parasitic Plant Genera List

Last Modified: 

Print

Confirm that the genus contains parasitic plants by checking the list of parasitic

plant genera. If your species is not on either list, use PPQ form 587.

* Some or all members of this genus are also regulated as Federal Noxious Weeds (7

CFR §360)

Loading...
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.3


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the previously filed registration statements on Form S-8 (numbers
33-44575; 33-29174; 2-95271; 2-51637; 2-54043; 2-59535; 2-68747; 2-78831;
33-55083-01; 33-55083-02; 333-28229-01; 333-28229-02) of our report dated May 9,
1997, incorporated by reference to 3333 Holding Corporation and Subsidiary and
Centex Development Company, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
March 31, 1997, and to all references to our firm included in these
registration statements.

Arthur Andersen LLP

Dallas, Texas
     June 27, 1997
#### Revlon, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*Henry Modell & Company, Inc. et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 28, 1959.

*Blumberg, Singer, Boss $ Gordon*for plaintiff.

*W. Edward Wood*for defendants.

Samuel H. Hofstadter, J.

Plaintiff moves for temporary injunction in enforcement of the Feld-Crawford Act (General Business Law, art. XXIV-A). The offending sales were made at the place of business operated by the defendants. In a subsequent action brought against another defendant, a similar application is before the court. On both motions, defendants urge the “ concessionaire ” defense, which alone requires any consideration.

The facts and circumstances of the offers for sale at the place of sale are sufficiently established to warrant temporary injunctive relief.

The concessionaire’s position is based on evasion. It is stated on behalf of that defendant that the notice given to the other defendants and dated November 7, 1958, came to its attention *“*after some delay” and after it had purchased substantial quantities of merchandise for sale for the next several months.

The offending sales were made as early as November 19, 1958, and as late as January 15,1959. The failure to more specifically state the date when the defendant received notice and made, as claimed, the purchase of its present stock, and to relate these facts to the dates of the offending sales, renders the defense insufficient, at this time at least, to defeat the present application. Indeed, it is not stated that there were no purchases made since the time when the defendant received notice.

Defendants urge that plaintiff may not enforce its fair-trade program because it sells at retail in competition with the retail trade. This contention is based on the operation by plaintiff of a salon on Fifth Avenue in New York City, which it maintains as part of its advertising program and where alone it sells at *592retail at the fair-traded prices as an incident to its consulting service, also offered as part of the advertising campaign. In these circumstances, the application is not thereby defeated. The motions are granted and the bond is fixed in each instance in the sum of $500.

Settle orders accordingly.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of D.S., J.S., and * From the 29th District Court

I.S., children, of Palo Pinto County,

 Trial Court No. C48326.

No. 11-19-00324-CV * February 13, 2020

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

 sitting by assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 31.10
  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
    CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CILCORP INC.
    (required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
    Form 10-K
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)) Rules 13a-15(f) 15d-15(f))
  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared; b)
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
    caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
    designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
    regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
    preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
    accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and d)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and    a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:
    February 29, 2008
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the previously filed registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos.
33-61223; 333-65217; 333-72893; 333-94221; and 333-96229) and on Form S-8 (Nos.
33-29174; 33-44575; 33-55083; 33-55083-01; 33-55083-02; 333-28229; 333-28229-01;
333-28229-02; 333-37956; 333-55717; 333-55717-01; 333-55717-02; 333-74185;
333-74185-01; 333-74185-02; 333-86041; 333-86041-01; and 333-86041-02) of our
report dated May 16, 2000, for Centex Corporation and Subsidiaries, 3333 Holding
Corporation and Subsidiary and Centex Development Company, L.P. and Subsidiaries
on Form 10-K for the years ended March 31, 2000, and to all references to our
Firm included in these registration statements.



                                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Dallas, Texas,
    May 30, 2000
TASK 54− 12 −01 −400 −801 Installation of the Forward Nacelle Leading Edge Fairing 1. General A. The maintenance procedure that follows is for the installation of the forward nacelle leading edge fairing. The leading edge fairing is an aerodynamic fairing which is installed on the forward nacelle. These procedures are applicable to the left nacelle and the right nacelle. The procedures for the left nacelle are given. Differences for the right nacelle are identified. 2. Job Set− Up Information Subtask 54 − 12 − 01 − 946 − 002 A. Reference Information REFERENCE DESIGNATION TASK 54 − 11 − 01 −400 − 801 Installation of the Leading Edge Fairing Forward Access Panels TASK 54 − 11 − 06 −400 − 801 Installation of the Leading Edge Fairing Aft Access Panels 3. Job Set− Up Subtask 54 − 12 − 01 − 860 − 002 A. Make sure that the aircraft is in the same configuration as in the removal task. 4. Procedure Subtask 54 − 12 − 01 −420 − 001 Refer to Figure 402. A. Install the leading edge fairing as follows: NOTE : Make sure that the surfaces are clean with no corrosion, paint, grease, or preservation fluids. (1) Hold the leading edge fairing (12) in the correct position on the nacelle. Use the data on the identification label to identify its position. (2) Install the 31 bolts (1). (3) Install the 21 bolts (2). (4) Install the 35 bolts (3). (5) Install the six bolts (4). (6) Install the two bolts (5). (7) Install the two bolts (6). (8) Install the two bolts (7). (9) Install the six bolts (8). (10) Install the four bolts (9) and the washers (10). AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE MANUAL

MASTER EFFECTIVITY: See Pageblock 54 − 12 − 01 page 401 

# 54 − 12 − 01 Page 406 Dec 05/2005(11) Install the eight bolts (11) and the washers (10). (12) Remove the identification label from the leading edge fairing (12). 5. Close Out Subtask 54 − 12 − 01 −410 − 001 A. Install the leading edge fairing forward access panel (Refer to TASK 54 − 11 − 01 −400 − 801). Subtask 54 − 12 − 01 −410 − 002 B. Install the leading edge fairing aft access panel (Refer to TASK 54 − 11 − 06 −400 − 801). Subtask 54 − 12 − 01 − 941 − 001 C. Remove all tools, equipment, and unwanted materials from the work area. AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE MANUAL

MASTER EFFECTIVITY: See Pageblock 54 − 12 − 01 page 401 

# 54 − 12 − 01 Page 407 Dec 05/2005sh514b01.dg, bmcc/gv, 14/06/02 2 2
2 3

6 5 8

4 4

5

6 8

4 3 2 7 1

Unidentified holes on fairing item 12 are attached by bolt item 1. NOTE 12

4 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE MANUAL

Leading Edge Fairing Figure 402 (Sheet 1 of 3) MASTER EFFECTIVITY: See Pageblock 54 − 12 − 01 page 401 

# 54 − 12 − 01 Page 408 Dec 05/2005sh514a02.dg, bmcc/gv, 14/06/02 4
3 2 7

4 Unidentified holes on fairing item 12 are attached by bolt item 1. NOTE AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE MANUAL

Leading Edge Fairing Figure 402 (Sheet 2 of 3) MASTER EFFECTIVITY: See Pageblock 54 − 12 − 01 page 401 

# 54 − 12 − 01 Page 409 Dec 05/2005sh514a03.dg, bmcc/gv, 14/06/02 11 10 11 10

9 10 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE MANUAL

Leading Edge Fairing Figure 402 (Sheet 3 of 3) MASTER EFFECTIVITY: See Pageblock 54 − 12 − 01 page 401 

# 54 − 12 − 01 Page 410 Dec 05/2005
**Exhibit 24.2****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     WHEREAS, UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, a Missouri corporation (herein referred to as the “Company”),is required to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, its annual report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2007; and     WHEREAS, each of the below undersigned is a director of the Company.     NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Thomas R. Voss and/orWarner L. Baxter and/or Steven R. Sullivan and/or Martin J. Lyons and/or Jerre E. Birdsong the trueand lawful attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned, for and in the name, place and stead of theundersigned, to affix the name of the undersigned to said Form 10-K and any amendments thereto,and, for the performance of the same acts, each with power to appoint in their place and stead andas their substitute, one or more attorneys-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power ofrevocation; hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact may do by virtuehereof.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 8th day of February2008:       Daniel F. Cole, Director /s/ Daniel F. Cole      Richard J. Mark, Director /s/ Richard J. Mark      Steven R. Sullivan, Director /s/ Steven R. Sullivan                 STATE OF MISSOURI  )      )  SS.CITY OF ST. LOUIS  )        On this 8th day of February, 2008, before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for saidState, personally appeared the above-named directors of Union Electric Company, known to me to bethe persons described in and who executed the foregoing power of attorney and acknowledged to methat they executed the same as their free act and deed for the purposes therein stated.     IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal.                  /s/ Donna S. Bilkey   DONNA S. BILKEY   Notary Public- Notary SealSTATE OF MISSOURI- JEFFERSON COUNTYCommission #06900096My Commission Expires 06/13/2010