alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Single Tier Label Claim (STLC)

Industry Guidance

Last Modified: 

Print

As part of a movement in 2015 toward single-tier effectiveness statements, 9CFR

112.5(b) was amended to require publication of efficacy and safety study summaries

on the APHIS website Licensed Veterinary Biological Product Information. This web

page provides details to licensees, permittees, and applicants on preparing and

submitting information for those summaries.

A summary of a single study is known herein as an Individual Study Summary (ISS).

It is prepared by the licensee and reviewed/edited/cleared by the Center for

Veterinary Biologics (CVB) for standard content and appearance. All of the ISSs

applicable to a single biological product are then compiled into a Product

Compilation Summary (PCS), which is posted to Licensed Veterinary Biological

Product Information. The compilation is performed by the CVB.

Scope of Products Affected by Single-Tier

Vaccines (including prescription platform products), bacterins, toxoids, and

immunomodulators are included under the scope of the new rule.

Products exempted include: antibody products, diagnostic test kits,

autogenous, and allergenic extracts.
Scope of Studies Requiring Single-Tier Summaries

Review this section to determine which of your firm's studies require an Individual

Study Summary

Individual Study Summary (ISS) Procedure

Use the ISS template provided by the CVB. Refer to the line-wise instructions

provided in the following section for details on how to prepare the ISS. Submit the

ISS to CVB as a Microsoft Word document to facilitate editing by CVB. Contact the

CVB at CVB.Single.Tier@usda.gov if you do not have access to Microsoft Word

software.

ISS template

ISS template line-wise instructions

Data Requirements

Submission guidance and instructions

Examples of a variety of Individual Study Summaries *Updated April 8, 2020

Implementation timeline *Updated November 19, 2019

Product Compilation Summaries (PCSs)

Review this section for more information on Product Compilation Summaries

Updating Product Codes Associated With

Approved ISSs

Licensees and permittees may need to update the list of product codes associated

with a cleared (approved) ISS. See more instructions.

Revisions to Outlines of Production for Single Tier

Label Claims
Review this document for more information on Outline of Production Revisions for

Single Tier Label Claim and see an example

Do you want a printable version of all the STLC

guidance?

Click here for the printable version of the "Guidance to Industry Preparing

Supporting Summaries for Single Tier (Single Label Claim) Effectiveness Statements"

document

Questions?

Questions may be directed to CVB.Single.Tier@usda.gov.
#### Impact Financial Services v. Kama'aina Termite & Pest Control, Inc.

27887

09/29/2008

Affirmed
Major Instruments and Agreements

on Santa Monica Airport Land (prepared by LA ADO - August 2007

Date Instrument Action

August 10, Instrument of Surrendered leasehold interest in land and conveyed easements and

1948 Transfer improvements

April 6, 1949 Quitclaim Deed Conveyed 21 acres to City without usual restrictions, conditions, etc.

April 25, 1952 Release Released Lot A of George Tract from all conditions, restrictions, etc.,

of Instrument of Transfer dated August 10, 1948.

September 15, Release The April 25, 1952 release was amended to include provision to

1952 protect airport activities.

Grants permission to abandon Runway No. I and releases obligation

o operate and maintain the runway for use and benefit of public.

March 5, 1956 Release Released Runway No. 1 only from the terms, covenants, conditions,

eservations, and restrictions set forth in Instrument of Transfer dated

~u~st 10, 1948.

Consents to use substantial portion of area located in southeast

section of the airport for uses compatible with airport operations to

provide expanded employment and revenue and increased parkland

for the city.

January 31, Settlement

1984 Agreement Consents to use of land designated as parkland and residual land

therein for other than airport purposes, releases the City and this

parkland and residual land from all conditions, covenants, and

estrictions imposed by the Instrument of Transfer dated August 10,

1948.

EXHIBIT

i~/Y1·ra
#### Karl R. LYMAN and Edith K. Lyman, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Howard F. HATCH and Leland G. Brooks, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 14164.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 3, 1976.

Glen J. Ellis, Maxfield, Gammon, Ellis & Dalebout, Provo, for defendants and appellants.

Dallas H. Young, Jr., Ivie & Young, Provo, for plaintiffs and respondents.

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a judgment on a promissory note awarded by the trial court, sitting without a jury. Affirmed, with costs on appeal to plaintiffs.

The defendants (appellants here) urge that although they signed the note, subject of this litigation, the obligation attendant thereto was an offspring of a nudum pac-um document that did not mean what it clearly said. This, it is averred, is because the history of its conception resulted in still birth because of technical aspects relating to 1) limited partnership interests, 2) statutory violations of partnership interests, and 3) because “owners of a corporation are not the owners of the corporations’ [sic] property.”

Withal this diversionary atmosphere, the appellants themselves, somewhat inconsistently, but more concisely and correctly advertised the real structure on which this appeal is bottomed, in that part of their brief entitled “Relief Sought on Appeal,” wherein they asked for reversal because “there was a failure of consideration for the note and that the same [for that reason] was unenforceable.”

Defendant Hatch, after having testified at great length in what proved to be far from a bullet-proof defense, — more in the nature of a truce or surrender, — conceded that when he signed the note he “assumed it was a legal note” and that he was to receive as a quid pro quo “for having signed it,” — “six thousand dollars worth of stock.”

*911The trial judge listened for hours about partnership liability, general and limited partnership concepts, testimony about other adjunctive cases involving antecedent res judicata arguments, — and came up with something with which we agree, — that without his requesting briefs or arguments or anything else, — and while still on the bench, — ad hocly, — and we think correctly, —and on the very last page of the transcript, — said: “I think the defendants have failed to prove failure1 of consideration in the matter . . . The court will be in recess.” This may have been an apologia for threadbare patience, but a study in a discernment of the only real issue in this case: The principle that a plaintiff must sustain the burden of what he asserts. We join the trial court in concluding such obligation was not evident here.

ELLETT, CROCKETT and TUCK-ETT, JJ., concur.

MAUGHAN, J., concurs in the result.

1

. It is assumed that the trial court used “failure” as consonant with “lack” of consideration.
cc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk Walter William Bulkeley

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2 MIME kalE111111111
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply604Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Arthur Phillip... (not verified)PermalinkAugust 28, 2018 - 1:25amThanks for the very interesting historical article.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 243 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representative in respect to promoting 

a strong national energy policy that supports the innovative and hardworking men and women in the oil and gas industry who have led 

the charge in a United States energy revolution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2015 

Mr. CONAWAY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representative in respect to promoting a strong national energy policy that 

supports the innovative and hard-working men and 

women in the oil and gas industry who have led the 

charge in a United States energy revolution. 

Whereas the United States is blessed by an abundance of 

natural resources and strong entrepreneurial, creative, 

and industrious spirit; 

Whereas pioneering techniques such as horizontal drilling and 

hydraulic fracturing have sparked an unprecedented 

boom in oilfields in Texas, Pennsylvania, North Dakota, 

Ohio, Colorado, and across the country; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 243 IH 

Whereas the United States has become a global leader in 

both oil and natural gas exploration due solely to the tireless and innovative efforts of every wildcatter, roustabout, 

roughneck, driller, derrickman, toolpusher, landman, 

company man, and many more; 

Whereas the economic impact of the boom created by the 

technological advances is felt throughout communities 

and industries outside of the oilfield through job creation 

and increased market demand; 

Whereas the oil and natural gas industry has continued to be 

a bright spot supporting thousands of jobs in a sluggish 

economy strapped by burdensome regulatory overreach 

and antiquated policies of bygone eras; 

Whereas the United States depends on their exhaustive hours 

and dangerous work to power homes, pave roads, fuel 

cars, farm lands, and everything that keeps the Nation 

running; 

Whereas the United States depends on their exhaustive hours 

and dangerous work to increase our energy independence, 

bolster national security, create jobs, and promote economic growth; and 

Whereas the House of Representatives recognizes that the 

United States energy policies must be as adaptive and innovative as the hard-working men and women in the oil 

patch: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 policies that— 

3 (1) cut through bureaucratic red tape to en4 courage domestic energy resurgence; 

5 (2) reduce harmful, job-killing regulations; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 243 IH 

1 (3) eliminate an obsolete, decades-old crude oil 

2 export ban to reduce price volatility, increase market 

3 stability, and promote economic growth. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Mark R.Tauscher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | May 11, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Mark R. Tauscher    |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   | Mark R. Tauscher        |
|   |         |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, James G.Thomasch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | May 11, 2004 | By:    | /s/ James G. Thomasch   |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   | James G. Thomasch       |
|   |         |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
28137

#### State v. Tyler

Affirmed
#### Kiehm v. Adams

25411

05/13/2004

Denied

Hawai'i , -P.3d-
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the filing by Applied Energetics, Inc. (the “company”) of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) I, Humberto A. Astorga, Principal Financial Officer of the company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(i)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company.




This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Financial Officer of Applied Energetics, Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Applied Energetics, Inc. and will be retained by Applied Energetics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Humberto A. AstorgaHumberto A. AstorgaPrincipal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting OfficerDate: May 10, 2011
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

NAHMS Poultry Studies

Last Modified: 

Print

NAHMS has conducted five studies on health and management practices on U.S.

poultry operations: Layers 2013, Poultry 2010, Poultry Small Enterprise 2007, Poultry

2004, and Layers 1999.

See the complete list of all NAHMS studies and related materials

Loading...
Poultry Studies
Organ"iration Petron Con:aettid t Date I Response" !

","lj",,~1UU~il'~'). ,Akn-':>Jl-\,hllnui".n Eli C:"ili

I

i 7il}"l(i

, I

lh~i"m,l ,\.irlllk' ;H~".-i:;l1ion IlJ:l.\'t 1."11~'{'" 7:IJI10

.\If(rJ,fl O"l\~rs.'" I'j][il~ AS$I>l:T;)filln II~{>b~rl11 :It!;:l1"in I

"lii JilD

,

I

,

,

,VI".-\ .\Iarl; L"pet.

I

7;j}qQ

I

I

-I!

L
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Charles Marion Russell Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
John B. Weaver

Materials
    Bronze

Year
    1959

Location
      
National Statuary Hall

This statue of Charles Marion Russell was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Montana in 1959.

Charles Marion Russell, noted American cowboy artist, was born in St. Louis, Missouri, on March 19, 1864. At the age of 16 he went to Montana to fulfill his dream of being a cowboy. While on the range, he began sketching to amuse his companions. As his natural talent matured, his watercolors and oils became popular. Gradually, painting became his life's work. He never became a skillful cowhand, despite his 16 years of effort.

In 1896, after marrying Nancy Cooper, who became his business manager, he settled down and built a studio in Great Falls, Montana. His works portrayed Indians, cattle round-ups, and the sort of frontier scenes that people in eastern cities found fascinating. His paintings, first sold in saloons and general stores, soon were used as illustrations in newspapers and began to appear in art galleries in New York, Boston, Chicago, and Los Angeles. He became famous. Several of his paintings were exhibited at the St. Louis World's Fair in 1904 and at the London Doré Galleries in 1914. By 1920 a painting of Russell's could sell for $10,000.00. Russell was also a superb sculptor. By 1904 his small wax figures of mounted cowboys, Indians, and animals were being cast in bronze and sold by Tiffany and Co. in New York.

Russell died on October 24, 1926, in Great Falls, Montana. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM 10-Q AT
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            3,276,000
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    35,660,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                        502,000
<INVENTORY>                                      21,273,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 61,227,000
<PP&E>                                           12,551,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  156,852,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            29,384,000
<BONDS>                                          78,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             21,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       55,494,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    156,852,000
<SALES>                                          61,522,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 61,522,000
<CGS>                                            29,628,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    29,628,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5,426,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4,310,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,770,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2,540,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2,540,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .11
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 231 (Monday, December 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 84185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0786]


Agency Information Collection Activity: Department of Veterans 
(VA) Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment (VR&E) Longitudinal Study 
Survey Questionnaire; Withdrawn

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Tuesday, November 28, 2023, the Veterans Benefits 
Administration (VA), published a notice in the Federal Register 
announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection 
``Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Vocational Rehabilitation and 
Employment (VR&E) Longitudinal Study Survey Questionnaire''. This 
notice was published in error; therefore, this document corrects that 
error by withdrawing this FR notice, document number 2023-26141.

DATES: As of November 28, 2023, the FR notice published at 88 FR 227 on 
Tuesday, November 28, 2023, is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maribel Aponte, Office of Enterprise 
and Integration, Data Governance Analytics (008), 810 Vermont Ave. NW, 
Washington, DC 20006, (202) 266-4688 or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83eee2f1eae1e6efade2f3ecedf7e6c3f5e2ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd909c8f949f9891d39c8d92938998bd8b9cd39a928b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FR Doc. 2023-26141, published on Tuesday, 
November 28, 2023, is withdrawn by this notice.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Maribel Aponte,
VA PRA Clearance Officer, Office of Enterprise and Integration/Data 
Governance Analytics, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023-26506 Filed 12-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>