alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subsidiaries of the Company
                   and State of Incorporation or Formation
     
     CV Warehouse 75, Inc.                        Florida
     CV Warehouse 76, Inc.                        Florida
     CV Warehouse 78, Inc.                        Florida
     W.X. Properties, Inc.                        Florida
     D.X. Properties, Inc.                        Florida
     GRX Corp.                                    Florida
     LRX Properties, Inc.                         Florida
     Montgomery CV Realty Trust                   Delaware
     Montgomery CV Realty L.P.                    Delaware
     Recreation Mortgages L.P.                    Delaware
     Recreation Mortgages LLC                     Delaware
     Drexel Realty, Inc.                          Pennsylvania
     Royce Realty, Inc.                           Pennsylvania
     MGA Payroll Company, Inc.                    Pennsylvania
     Rio Grande Associates                        Pennsylvania
     Rio Grande Associates LLC                    Delaware
     Danville Plaza Associates, L.P.              Delaware
     Danville Plaza LLC                           Delaware
     Woodbourne Square Associates, L.P.           Delaware
     Woodbourne Square LLC                        Delaware
     Chesterbrook Village Center Associates, L.P. Delaware
     Chesterbrook Village Center LLC              Delaware
     Mount Carmel Plaza Associates, L.P.          Delaware
     Mount Carmel Plaza LLC                       Delaware
     Glenmont Associates, L.P.                    Pennsylvania
     Glenmont LLC                                 Delaware
     Plymouth Plaza Associates, L.P.              Delaware
     Plymouth Plaza LLC                           Delaware
     County Line Plaza Realty Associates, L.P.    Delaware
     County Line Plaza Realty, LLC                Delaware
     555 Scott Street Associates, L.P.            Delaware
     555 Scott Street LLC                         Delaware
     Route 6 Office Max Center Associates, L.P.   Delaware
     Route 6 Office Max Center LLC                Delaware
#### Carrilho v. Carrilho

25119, 25496

12/24/2003

Affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 24, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 17, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 21 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-63, CP2024-64.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-25899 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# L_2004277EN.01002701.xml

| 26.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 277/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 277/27

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 56/2004

of 23 April 2004

amending Annex XXII (Company law) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XXII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 15/2004 of 6 February 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XXII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 15/2004 of 6 February 2004 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2003/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 amending Council Directive 68/151/EEC, as regards disclosure requirements in respect of certain types of companies (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2003/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 amending Council Directive 68/151/EEC, as regards disclosure requirements in respect of certain types of companies (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 68/151/EEC) of Annex XXII to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32003 L 0058: Directive 2003/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 amending Council Directive 68/151/EEC, as regards disclosure requirements in respect of certain types of companies (OJ L 221, 4.9.2003, p. 13).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32003 L 0058: Directive 2003/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 amending Council Directive 68/151/EEC, as regards disclosure requirements in respect of certain types of companies (OJ L 221, 4.9.2003, p. 13).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2003/58/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 April 2004, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 April 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

P. WESTERLUND

---

(1)  
  OJ L 116, 22.4.2004, p. 68.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 221, 4.9.2003, p. 13.

2

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

History of Requirement Updates for

Live Animal Exports

Last Modified: 

Print

This page serves as a resource for you to find and view updates to live animal export

requirements posted to APHIS' International Regulations for Animal Exports and Pet

Travel.

Learn more at International Regulations for Animal Exports and Pet Travel. 

Want to receive email notifications from APHIS when updates are added below?

Subscribe to our email list and select the "Veterinary Services - IREGS Live Animals

Updates (Exports)" topic. 

The table below is searchable and sortable. Use the “Search” box to filter the table

for entries containing the keyword(s) you enter, or click on the column headings

within the table to sort by date, country, commodity category or detail, and action

performed.

Loading...
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
John Hanson Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Richard E. Brooks

Materials
    Bronze

Year
    1903

Location
      
Hall of Columns

This statue of John Hanson was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Maryland in 1903.

John Hanson was born in Charles County, Maryland, on April 3, 1715. While serving in the Maryland Assembly from 1757 to 1773 he was active in raising troops and providing arms. In 1779 Hanson served as a delegate to the Continental Congress, where he helped to resolve the western lands issue, thereby facilitating the ratification of the Articles of Confederation.

From 1781 to 1782 he was "President of the United States in Congress Assembled" under the Articles of Confederation. As the presiding officer of Congress, Hanson was responsible for initiating a number of programs that helped America gain a world position. During his tenure the first consular service was established, a post office department was initiated, a national bank was chartered, progress was made towards taking the first census, and a uniform system of coinage was adopted. As "President," Hanson also signed a treaty with Holland affirming the indebtedness of the United States for a loan from that country. In addition, he signed all laws, regulations, official papers and letters.

Hanson died on November 15, 1783, at the age of 68. His contributions to the government under the Articles of Confederation were absorbed by the new federal government. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
AMENDMENT #3 TO MANAGEMENT SERVICE AGREEMENT


WHEREAS,  Standard  Management  Corporation  and  Standard  Life  Insurance
Company  of  Indiana  have  entered  into  a  Management  Service Agreement
effective August 1, 1992.

AND  WHEREAS,  Standard Management Corporation and Standard Life  Insurance
Company of Indiana  have  entered  into  Amendment  #1  to  this Management
Service Agreement effective January 1, 1995.

AND  WHEREAS,  Standard Management Corporation and Standard Life  Insurance
Company of Indiana  have  entered  into  Amendment  #2  to  this Management
Services Agreement effective January 1, 1997.

NOW THEREFORE, effective January 1, 1999, paragraph 4 of such  agreement as
amended  by Amendment #1 and Amendment #2 shall be amended by deleting  the
former paragraph 4 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

              4.   In consideration for the services provided in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3, Standard  agrees  to  pay  the  company a monthly fee of Three
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000) which is due  and  payable  within  ten
(10) days from the receipt of the invoice.


IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed effective January 1,
1999 this Amendment #3 to the Management Service Agreement.


STANDARD MANAGEMENTSTANDARD LIFE INSURANCE
CORPORATIONCOMPANY OF INDIANA


By: _________________________By: ________________________________
Edward T. StahlRaymond J. Ohlson
Executive Vice President & President
Director Corporate Development
24232

#### State v. Lum

Affirmed
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7090

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DOMINIC ANTHONY DICLEMENTE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (5:95-cr-00010-RLV; 5:07-cv-00066-RLV)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 25, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Clark Fischer, RANDOLPH & FISCHER, Winston-Salem, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United

States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dominic Anthony Diclemente seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Diclemente has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 31.9
  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
    CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CILCORP INC.
    (required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
    Form 10-K
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)) Rules 13a-15(f) 15d-15(f))
  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared; b)
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
    caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
    designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
    regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
    preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
    accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and d)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and    a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:
    February 29, 2008
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply563Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Susan (not verified) (not verified)PermalinkMay 17, 2017 - 2:28pmWhat a wonderful use of tax dollars, and what a clever solution to this problem. This was delightful to read.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Mason-Dixon
Bancshares, Inc. September 30, 1998 financial statements and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      22,150,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         416,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            10,449,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                188,595,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     364,166,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       556,755,607
<LOANS>                                    461,428,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  9,193,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,083,283,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 613,208,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                48,860,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         10,850,000
<LONG-TERM>                                328,637,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,059,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,571,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,083,283,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             36,857,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,566,537
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,052,293
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            61,286,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          18,401,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          32,877,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       28,409,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                3,614,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             505,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             27,153,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,084,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   8,084,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,084,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.10
<LOANS-NON>                                  6,176,507
<LOANS-PAST>                                   321,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               831,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             11,379,033
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             5,231,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                2,992,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   417,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            9,193,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         9,193,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Thomas M. Galbreath, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk Comity,

January 16, 1959.

*David P. Sipperly*for administrator.

*Anne F. Mead*for Anne O’Brien, claimant.

Edgar F. Hazleton, S.

This is a motion by the administrator for an order granting summary judgment against a claimant; or, in the alternative, dismissing the subject claim for failure to prosecute.

The claim herein has been duly filed with and rejected by the administrator, and more than three months have passed since its rejection. No petition for a voluntary accounting has been filed by the administrator, and no petition for a compulsory accounting proceeding has been filed by the claimant, although *243more than seven months has passed since the granting of letters of administration.

There is no question as to the availability of the remedy of summary judgment in the Surrogate’s Court (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 316; Rules Civ. Prac., rules 3, 113; *Matter of Pascal,*309 N. Y. 108, 113; *Matter of Fishkind,*271 App. Div. 1013); and presumably, a motion under section 181 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 156 of the Buies of Civil Practice would be proper in the Surrogate’s Court by virtue of section 316 of the Surrogate’s Court Act and rule 3 of the Buies of Civil Practice, also, in a proceeding. However, these motions may be made only in pending proceedings. A petition, citation, and answer (and/or objections) are the analogue of the summons, complaint and answer; the filing and rejection of a notice of claim are not. A proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court is commenced by the filing of a petition (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 48). The filing and rejection of a notice of claim does not accomplish this result *(Matter of Evans,*183 Misc. 717) except for the limited purpose of tolling a Statute of Limitations (see *Matter of Schorer,*272 N. Y. 247). Moreover, with respect to the particular subject matter of this motion, section 211 of the Surrogate’s Court Act directs that the determination be made in an accounting proceeding. Accordingly, the court would have no authority to grant this motion, regardless of its merits. Accordingly, the motion is denied in its entirety.

Settle order on notice denying motion in its entirety.