alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 229 (Thursday, November 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 83595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26362]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 547]


Delegation of Authority Under the Creating Helpful Incentives To 
Produce Semiconductors (CHIPS) Act of 2022

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the 
laws of the United States, including section 1 of the State Department 
Basic Authorities Act (22 U.S.C. 2651a) and section 102(c) of the CHIPS 
Act of 2022 (Div. A, Pub. L. 117-167) (CHIPS Act), I hereby delegate 
the following functions to the extent authorized by law:
    <bullet> To the Director and the Deputy Director of the Office of 
U.S. Foreign Assistance, the function conferred upon the Secretary of 
State by section 102(c)(1) of the CHIPS Act to approve the transfer of 
amounts in the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors 
(CHIPS) for America International Technology Security and Innovation 
Fund (ITSI Fund) to foreign assistance accounts within the Department 
of State and the United States Agency for International Development and 
to accounts within the Export-Import Bank and the United States 
International Development Finance Corporation, as appropriate, to be 
used for such purposes and under the terms and conditions of the 
account to which transferred.
    <bullet> To the Under Secretary for Management, the function 
conferred upon the Secretary of State by section 102(c)(1) of the CHIPS 
Act to approve the transfer of amounts in the CHIPS ITSI Fund to 
diplomatic engagement accounts within the Department of State to be 
used for such purposes and under the terms and conditions of the 
account to which transferred.
    The Secretary, the Deputy Secretary, and the Deputy Secretary for 
Management and Resources may exercise any function or authority 
delegated herein. Any reference in this delegation of authority to a 
statute shall be deemed to be a reference to such statute as amended 
from time to time and shall be deemed to apply to any provision of law 
that is the same or substantially the same as such statute. This 
delegation of authority does not repeal or otherwise affect any other 
delegation of authority currently in effect.
    This delegation of authority will be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: July 3, 2023.
Antony J. Blinken,
Secretary of State.

    Editorial Note: This document was received for publication by 
the Office of the Federal Register on November 27, 2023.

[FR Doc. 2023-26362 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
August 31, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Amendment to Exemption 11426 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA 

Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket 

NO. FAA-2015-0173 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

 Alaska Aerial Media LLC. was issued an Exemption numbered 11426 

(hereinafter the Exemption) for the purpose of aerial cinematography 

and videography, as well as implementation of emergency use UAS systems with 

public entities. Alaska Aerial Media requests an amendment to the exemption to 

allow for night operation for use in aerial data collection applications with our 

aircraft previously approved via our amendments. 

Alaska Aerial Media LLC wishes to operate UAS systems at night

in Class G airspace with the use of LATAS software to mitigate safety 

concerns by watching manned traffic and UAS traffic while avoiding obstacles or 

collisions. Aircraft will have flight lights and use a Visual Observer that has inspected 

area before flight. Alaska Aerial Media is confident that UAS operations can 

reduce the risk associated with manned aviation. All operations of the additional 

UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption. 

 Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning 

this request for amendment to the Exemption. 

Sincerely, 

Ryan P. Marlow 

Alaska Aerial Media 

7960 Upper OMalley Road 

Anchorage Alaska 99507 

Tele: (907)-717-9794
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12956Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Ted Bechtol (not verified)PermalinkMarch 1, 2024 - 10:53amGreat to see the excellent work and professional progression that the Capitol Grounds and Arboretum jurisdiction has accomplished.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Michael T. Mino, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of T-3 Energy Services, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       */*s/ MICHAEL T. MINO         Michael T. Mino    Chief Financial Officer    November 5, 2007
Exhibit 31.1
IEA Income Fund X
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATIONS
     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IEA Income Fund X (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of theRegistrant, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and wehave:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 24, 2005
/s/ DENNIS J TIETZDennis J Tietz
June 10, 2004

24892

#### Hawaii Environmental Holdings v. Souza

Affirmed
H. Res. 219 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 22, 2015. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Takai. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 356 

Expressing support for designation of May 30 as ‘‘National Bartter Syndrome 

Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2015 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio (for himself and Mr. JOYCE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of May 30 as ‘‘National 

Bartter Syndrome Day’’. 

Whereas bartter syndrome is a rare kidney condition that 

causes an imbalance of potassium, sodium, chloride, and 

other molecules in the body; 

Whereas the antenatal form of bartter syndrome, which begins before birth, is often life-threatening and is characterized by abnormally high levels of amniotic fluid surrounding the affected fetus, premature delivery, and salt 

loss; 

Whereas the classical form of bartter syndrome, which begins 

in early childhood and tends to be less severe, causes individuals to experience fatigue, muscle weakness, growth 

delay, and developmental delay; 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 356 IH 

Whereas bartter syndrome likely affects approximately one 

per million people worldwide, although the exact prevalence is unknown; 

Whereas increased awareness and research of the bartter syndrome will promote accurate and early recognition of the 

disorder and help families with children suffering from 

this condition cope with the associated difficulties; and 

Whereas May 30 would be an appropriate date to designate 

as ‘‘National Bartter Syndrome Day’’: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘National Bartter Syndrome Day’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

FOIA: Will My Medical Records

Become Public Information?

Last Modified: 

Print

Attending Veterinarian Information - Select a Topic - ▾ Go

Any records that the USDA has in its possession may become publicly available

through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Inspectors will review a facility’s written program of veterinary care and any

associated medical records during an inspection, but the records typically remain in

the possession of the facility. Inspectors do NOT retain veterinary records for any

facility.

One exception is if a citation is issued in response to a routine inspection or a

complaint. In this case, supporting documentation may be copied to document the

citation. Those records would be uploaded to the USDA inspection database as part

of the citation. Because these records would now be in our possession, they are

subject to disclosure under specific requests per FOIA.

FOIA requests are fulfilled following redaction of any personally identifying

information.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of American Media Operations, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David J. Pecker, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/David J. Pecker
------------------
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus II Incorporated
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Sam P. Douglass, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 16, 2005 |  | /s/ Sam P. Douglass    
|                    |  | Sam P. Douglass        
|                    |  | Chairman               
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer



35
#### Ralph H. Lloyd, Respondent, *v.*Herman Karp, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

April 9, 1959.

*Vogel, Vogel & Fremont {Bernard Fremont*of'counsel), for appellant.

*Clarence W. Williamson, Jr.,*and *Albert P. Thill*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Order unanimously reversed upon the law, with $10 costs *to*defendant, and motion denied. In the absence of statutory authority, the District Court of the County of Nassau *873is without power to remove an action from the City Court of the City of Long Beach and consolidate it with an action pending in the District Court. (See *Blumenthal & Co.*v. *Tiedemann & Sons,*118 Misc. 560.)

Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Benjamin, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.
1 Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Ngo, Dan (FAA) Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 5:24 PM
To: 'gene@staeppen.com' Subject: Request for Information - FAA-2015-5144

Dear Mr. Gladden:

This letter is to inform you that we have rece ived and reviewed your reques t for an exemption under Section 333, Regulatory Docket No . FAA-2015-5144. Upon initial review , it was determined that more information was needed in order to move forward wit h your request. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your request.

 Please clarify the power source (i.e. battery/ gas/propane-powered) for th e aircraft below. The list represents an initial assessment of the aircraft that the FAA is unable to move forward with.

1. Leica Dragon 50

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov

. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by January 27, 2016. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

Regards,

Dan Ngo Office of Rulemaking, Aircra ft and Airport Rules Division Federal Aviation Administration
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

 

June 7, 2011 

Ms. Dorothy Beard 

Chief-Docket Operations 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Delta/Virgin Australia Group Antitrust Immunity Proceeding 

 Docket OST-2009-0155 

Dear Ms. Beard: 

For the reasons stated in the June 3 Joint Reply, Mr. Horan's comments are without merit. The 

Joint Applicants do not intend to respond further to Mr. Horan's unauthorized surreply. 

Sincerely, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc: Anita Mosner, Counsel for the Virgin Blue Group
RE: Additional questions on PNM's revised cost estimate for the SJGS SCR 
project
	Norem, Nancy 
	to:
	Joe Kordzi
	11/04/2010 02:08 PM
	Cc:
	"Gannon, Maureen", "McGuffey, Mack", "Fischer, Diane M.", "Lucas, Kyle 
J.", "Alvidrez, Richard (Miller)"
	Show Details



History:	This message has been replied to and forwarded.




Joe,
 
The attached information [AI E-23 101104.pdf, TechDocs_621215.pdf, PO_62 1215.pdf] responds to the three questions raised in your 
11/01/2010 email concerning SJRPP proposal as it relates to the San Juan 
SCR cost estimate.
 
Nancy
 
 

From: Kordzi.Joe@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Kordzi.Joe@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 11:39 AM
To: Norem, Nancy
Cc: Gannon, Maureen
Subject: Additional questions on PNM's revised cost estimate for the SJGS 
SCR project

Nancy, 

As we continue to review PNM's revised cost analysis, some additional 
questions came to light.  Please provide the following:   
(1) Any additional sections to the SJRPP proposal that were not otherwise 
provided.   
(2) Did the SJRPP project include modifications to the air heaters?  If 
yes, please provide a description of the modifications and the final 
vendor quote for the work.   
(3) Please provide a copy of the 3/15/07 RFQ for SJRPP and any 
modifications thereto. 


Regards,

Joe

" ... and miles to go before I sleep."
-- Robert Frost