alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TASK 54−12−01−400−801

Installation of the Forward Nacelle Leading Edge Fairing

1. General

A. The maintenance procedure that follows is for the installation of the forward nacelle

leading edge fairing. The leading edge fairing is an aerodynamic fairing which is installed

on the forward nacelle. These procedures are applicable to the left nacelle and the right

nacelle. The procedures for the left nacelle are given. Differences for the right nacelle

are identified.

2. Job Set−Up Information

Subtask 54−12−01−946−002

A. Reference Information

REFERENCE DESIGNATION

TASK 54−11−01−400−801 Installation of the Leading Edge Fairing Forward

Access Panels

TASK 54−11−06−400−801 Installation of the Leading Edge Fairing Aft

Access Panels

3. Job Set−Up

Subtask 54−12−01−860−002

A. Make sure that the aircraft is in the same configuration as in the removal task.

4. Procedure

Subtask 54−12−01−420−001

Refer to Figure 402.

A. Install the leading edge fairing as follows:

NOTE: Make sure that the surfaces are clean with no corrosion, paint, grease, or

preservation fluids.

(1) Hold the leading edge fairing (12) in the correct position on the nacelle. Use the

data on the identification label to identify its position.

(2) Install the 31 bolts (1).

(3) Install the 21 bolts (2).

(4) Install the 35 bolts (3).

(5) Install the six bolts (4).

(6) Install the two bolts (5).

(7) Install the two bolts (6).

(8) Install the two bolts (7).

(9) Install the six bolts (8).

(10) Install the four bolts (9) and the washers (10).

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE MANUAL

MASTER

EFFECTIVITY: See Pageblock 54−12−01 page 401 54−12−01 Page 406

Dec 05/2005
(11) Install the eight bolts (11) and the washers (10).

(12) Remove the identification label from the leading edge fairing (12).

5. Close Out

Subtask 54−12−01−410−001

A. Install the leading edge fairing forward access panel (Refer to

TASK 54−11−01−400−801).

Subtask 54−12−01−410−002

B. Install the leading edge fairing aft access panel (Refer to TASK 54−11−06−400−801).

Subtask 54−12−01−941−001

C. Remove all tools, equipment, and unwanted materials from the work area.

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE MANUAL

MASTER

EFFECTIVITY: See Pageblock 54−12−01 page 401 54−12−01 Page 407

Dec 05/2005
sh514b01.dg, bmcc/gv, 14/06/02

2

2

2

3

6

5

8

4

4

5

6

8

4

3

2

7

1

Unidentified holes on fairing item 12

are attached by bolt item 1.

NOTE

12

4

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE MANUAL

Leading Edge Fairing

Figure 402 (Sheet 1 of 3)

MASTER

EFFECTIVITY: See Pageblock 54−12−01 page 401 54−12−01 Page 408

Dec 05/2005
sh514a02.dg, bmcc/gv, 14/06/02

4

3

2

7

Unidentified holes on fairing item 12 4

are attached by bolt item 1.

NOTE

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE MANUAL

Leading Edge Fairing

Figure 402 (Sheet 2 of 3)

MASTER

EFFECTIVITY: See Pageblock 54−12−01 page 401 54−12−01 Page 409

Dec 05/2005
sh514a03.dg, bmcc/gv, 14/06/02

11

10

11

10

9

10

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE MANUAL

Leading Edge Fairing

Figure 402 (Sheet 3 of 3)

MASTER

EFFECTIVITY: See Pageblock 54−12−01 page 401 54−12−01 Page 410

Dec 05/2005
# EUR-Lex - 22004D0002 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22004D0002

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 2/2004 of 6 February 2004 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 116 , 22/04/2004 P. 0042 - 0043 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 2/2004

of 6 February 2004

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 106/2003 of 26 September 2003(1).

(2) Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 179/2003 of 5 December 2003(2).

(3) Commission Decision 2003/525/EC of 18 July 2003 deferring the date of implementation of Council Directive 1999/36/EC for certain transportable pressure equipment(3) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Annex II to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:

The following point is inserted after point 6b (Council Directive 1999/36/EC) of Chapter VIII:

"6c. 32003 D 0525: Commission Decision 2003/525/EC of 18 July 2003 deferring the date of implementation of Council Directive 1999/36/EC for certain transportable pressure equipment (OJ L 183, 22.7.2003, p. 45)."

Article 2

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:

1. Point 17g (Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) is renumbered as point 17h.

2. The following point is inserted after point 17f (Council Directive 1999/36/EC):

"17g. 32003 D 0525: Commission Decision 2003/525/EC of 18 July 2003 deferring the date of implementation of Council Directive 1999/36/EC for certain transportable pressure equipment (OJ L 183, 22.7.2003, p. 45)."

3. The following point is inserted after point 42c (Council Directive 1999/36/EC):

"42d. 32003 D 0525: Commission Decision 2003/525/EC of 18 July 2003 deferring the date of implementation of Council Directive 1999/36/EC for certain transportable pressure equipment (OJ L 183, 22.7.2003, p. 45)."

Article 3

The texts of Decision 2003/525/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 7 February 2004, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(4).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 February 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

P. Westerlund

(1) OJ L 331, 18.12.2003, p. 16.

(2) OJ L 88, 25.3.2004, p. 59.

(3) OJ L 183, 22.7.2003, p. 45.

(4) No constitutional requirements indicated.
19329

#### State v. Aku

January 23, 1997

Order No. 97-6

Vacated
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 22, 2022

NO. 03-21-00507-CV

Nicolas Moyer, Appellant

v.

Homeowners’ Association for Deer Creek Ranch, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER AND TRIANA

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on August 17, 2021. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that Nicolas Moyer has not prosecuted his appeal and did 

not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal 

for want of prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this 

Court and in the court below.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Wild Bird Avian Influenza

Surveillance

Last Modified: 

Print
Adams, Kevin (CST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Mr. Adams, 

Matthew Mitchell [mmitchell@agh.org] 

Thursday, November 03, 2011 2:07 PM 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Essential Air Service Bid in Alpena 

, -, ~ ;,'-;HT;~~;(:t>.:· - "'-·- ~~'- ' i _,, 

:- ·- I I ,_' 

I am writing in regards to the Essential Air Service bids for the Alpena County Airport. I think that the flying publicthose paying for the $3 Million dollar subsidy- deserve better than the Gulfstream International bid. This is a huge 

step down in service for the residents of all of Northeast Michigan. It would require multiple layovers in order to get to 

many major flying destinations. In order to visit my family in New Orleans it would take a minimum of 13 hours (on the 

best itinerary available) and cost over $700. It would require senior citizens to be on a plane for over an hour without a 

restroom. It would require many more cancellations due to the smaller plane. It would strand people out of state when 

flights get cancelled. 

The citizens of Northeast Michigan do not want the service being proposed by Gulfstream International. We would 

like to see our airport get to the point where we don't need the Essential Air Service. Our numbers have been climbing 

steadily. Delta, in its decision to retire its turbo-prop fleet, has done little or nothing to make their regional jet 

successful in Alpena. The people of Northeast Michigan were not even made aware of the jet service when it was here 

for a short while in the spring and I think that Delta would continue to be successful in Alpena if they worked with the 

Alpena County Airport to market their service. Enplanements have been up without the jet. The regional jet would be a 

great benefit to our communities and would make the numbers rise even more. 

Please do not accept the inadequate bid from Gulfstream lnternation. It is a waste of public money. The public should 

get something for what they are subsidizing. Gulfstream is not the answer and the people of Northeast Michigan will 

not use its service. 

Sincerely, 

Matt Mitchell 

Network Analyst 

MIS Department 

Alpena Regional Medical Center 

P 989.356.8064, F 989.356.7775 

mjmitchell@agh.org 

www.AipenaRegionaiMedicaiCenter.org 

This internet message may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure. It is 

intended for use only by the person to whom it is addressed. If you have received this in error, please (1) do not forward 

or use this information in any way; and (2) notify us immediately by responding to this email and then delete this email 

and any attachments from your computer. Thank you, Alpena Regional Medical Center 

1
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Chief Financial Officer of C&M Management Inc. and Director of Accounting of Boston Capital Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.



|                  | Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.
|----------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|Date:             |                                        
|February 20, 2004 | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply411Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Dia (not verified) (not verified)PermalinkJune 28, 2013 - 1:44pmGood Article. Thank you!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 610



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I No. CR-14-783

KAMRAN TYSHUN JACKSON APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered October 28, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE CONWAY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 15CR-13-154] HONORABLE JERRY RAMEY, JUDGE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge Kamran Tyshun Jackson appeals his Conway County jury conviction of one count of theft of property with a value over $1,000 but less than $5,000—a class D felony. His counsel initially filed a motion to be relieved as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k), stating that there were no nonfrivolous issues to present on appeal. However, on June 17, 2015, this court ordered rebriefing, finding that counsel’s brief at that time did not satisfy the requirements of Anders , supra , or Rule 4- 3(k), because it failed to address an adverse-sentencing decision. 1 This current appeal follows after rebriefing. Counsel has once again filed a motion to be relieved as counsel pursuant to Anders , upra , and Rule 4-3(k). The motion is accompanied by an abstract and addendum of

1 Jackson v. State , 2015 Ark. App. 400.Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 610

theproceedings below, which includes all objections and motions decided adversely to Jackson, and a brief in which counsel explains why there is nothing in the record that would support an appeal. Jackson was informed of his right to file pro se points for reversal, but he has not done so. The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error but whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. See Tucker v. State , 47 Ark. App. 96, 885 S.W.2d 904 (1994). From our review of the record and the brief presented to us, we find compliance with Rule 4-3(k) and hold that there is no merit to an appeal. Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted. G LOVER and B ROWN , JJ., agree. Files & Brasuell, PLLC , by: Toney B. Brasuell , for appellant. No response.

2
>thCourt ofAppgateDistrict

TEXAS/ 

### CATHYS.LUSK,C\ OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 .1- COPY

7/24/2015 CARR, DONNIE DALE V COA Case No. 12-14-00335-CR Tr. Ct. No. 007-0863-14 PD-0930-15 

### On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant's motion for an extension of time inwhich to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the petition has been extended to Monday, August 31, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition for Discretionary Review must be filed with the CourtofCriminal Appeals. Abel Acosta, Clerk A

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354 TYLER, TX 75701 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
#### State v. Sinagoga

22099

03/06/2002

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Confirmation Letters

Last Modified: 

Print

The table below provides confirmation requests submitted to APHIS and APHIS’

corresponding response. The definitions for the exemption categories in the table

are in the Table Key below. 

Table Key

(b)(1): A change resulting from cellular repair of a targeted DNA break in the

absence of an externally provided repair template

(b)(2): A targeted single base pair substitution

(b)(3): A gene known to occur in the plant’s gene pool, or a change in a targeted

sequence to correspond to a known allele of such a gene or to a known structural

variation present in the gene pool

(c): A plant-trait-mechanism of action combination that has been previously

reviewed for risks to plant health and determined by APHIS not be regulated under

this part, either via the Regulatory Status Review process or a petition submitted

pursuant to the legacy part 340 regulations.

Loading...
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 230 (Friday, December 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 83977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26549]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Federal Register CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  The meeting was 
noticed on November 28, 2023, at 88 FR 83164-65.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:  Wednesday, November 
29, 2023, from 10:00 a.m.-5:20 p.m. and Thursday, November 30, 2023, 
from 8:30 a.m.-2:05 p.m. Eastern.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING:  There are changes to two sessions on 
Wednesday, November 29, and one session on Thursday, November 30, 2023.

November 29, 2023

Original

Closed Session: 2:55-4:35 p.m.
<bullet> NSF SAHPR Update
<bullet> SAHPR-related Statement and Discussion with NSB
<bullet> Vote to move into Executive Plenary Closed
Closed (Executive) Session: 4:35-5:20 p.m.
<bullet> NSB/NSF Discussion of SAHPR-related Statement

Updated

Closed Session: 2:55-4:50 p.m.
<bullet> NSF SAHPR Update
<bullet> SAHPR-related Statements and Discussion with NSB
<bullet> Vote to move into Executive Plenary Closed

Closed (Executive) Session: 4:50-5:30 p.m.

<bullet> NSB/NSF Discussion of SAHPR-related Statements

November 30, 2023

Original

Open Session: 8:30-9:50 a.m.
<bullet> NSB Chair's Opening Remarks
<bullet> Presentation and Discussion, Office of the Chief Diversity and 
Inclusion Officer, Charles Barber
<bullet> NSB Committee Reports
    [cir] Committee on Awards and Facilities Next Generation Very Large 
Array
    [cir] Committee on Oversight
    [cir] NSB-NSF Commission on Merit Review

Updated

Open Session: 9:15-9:50 a.m.
<bullet> NSB Chair's Opening Remarks
<bullet> NSB Committee Reports
    [cir] Committee on Awards and Facilities Next Generation Very Large 
Array
    [cir] Committee on Oversight
    [cir] NSB-NSF Commission on Merit Review

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Chris Blair, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d7b4b5bbb6bea597b9a4b1f9b0b8a1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbd8d9d7dad2c9fbd5c8dd95dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>, 703/292-7000.

Ann E. Bushmiller,
Senior Legal Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-26549 Filed 11-29-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  August 20, 2007 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                          
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                       | Marc N. Teal, 
Principal Financial Officer