alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3


 


Amendment
No. 1 to Employment Agreement


 


This Amendment No.
1 to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of July 10, 2018, by and among B. Riley Financial,
Inc. (the “Company”) and Bryant R. Riley (the “Executive”). The above parties are referred
to collectively herein as the “Parties,” and individually as a “Party.”


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
have entered into an Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2018 (the “Existing Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Executive desire to amend the Existing Agreement to revise certain terms contained therein.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW THEREFORE, each
of the Parties, in consideration of the mutual promises hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby agree as follows:


 


1.             Definitions. Each capitalized term not defined herein shall have the definition ascribed to it in the Existing Agreement.


 


2.             Amendment. The Existing Agreement shall be amended as follows:


 


(a)            By deleting Section 1 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:


 


“Employment.
The Company shall employ the Executive as Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company (“Position”), and Executive
accepts such employment commencing on July 10, 2018 and continuing until terminated in accordance with the termination provisions
below (the “Employment Period”).”


 


(b)           By
deleting the second sentence of Section 3.2 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:


 


“Executive’s
target bonus shall be equal to not less than 150% of Executive’s Base Salary.”


 


3.             Full Force and Effect. Except as specifically modified or amended by the terms of this Amendment, the Existing Agreement
and all provisions contained therein are, and shall continue, in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed.


 


4.             Miscellaneous Provisions.


 


(a)           Further Assurances. Each Party, at the reasonable request of the other Party, and without additional consideration,
shall, from time to time (i) execute and deliver, or shall cause to be executed and delivered, such further certificates, agreements
or instruments, and (ii) take such other action, as the other Party may reasonably request, to consummate or implement the amendment
contemplated by this Amendment.


 



     


     


    

 


(b)           Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
to be an original and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument.


 


[Signature page follows]


 



    2


     


    

 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Parties have executed this Amendment on the date first written above.


 


	 	B. Riley Financial, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Phillip J. Ahn
	 	 	  Name: Phillip J. Ahn
	 	 	  Title: CFO & COO
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/Bryant R. Riley	 
	 	 	    Bryant R. Riley
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 331 

Expressing support for States to adopt ‘‘Racheal’s Law’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2015 

Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for States to adopt ‘‘Racheal’s Law’’. 

Whereas there are approximately 293,000 victims of sexual 

assault every year; 

Whereas 82 percent of sexual assaults were perpetrated by a 

non-stranger; 

Whereas 46 percent of rapists who were released from prison 

were re-arrested within 3 years of their release for another crime; of which 18.6 percent was for a violent offense; 

Whereas victims of sexual assault are 3 times more likely to 

suffer from depression, 6 times more likely to suffer from 

post-traumatic stress disorder, 13 times more likely to 

abuse alcohol, 26 times more likely to abuse drugs, and 

4 times more likely to contemplate suicide; and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 331 IH 

Whereas victim interaction with their offender can cause further emotional trauma: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) encourages States to ensure that victims of 

3 rape or sexual assault can file and obtain a restrain4 ing order against the guilty party for an indefinite 

5 period of time without the necessity of renewal or re6 filing; and 

7 (2) encourages States to ensure that victims of 

8 rape or sexual assault can be represented by an at9 torney instead of being physically present during 

10 hearings involving their convicted attacker. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1155

TEWODROS G. ABAYNEH, 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, 

 Respondent. 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals 

Submitted: October 16, 2008 Decided: November 17, 2008 

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Solomon Bekele, LAW OFFICES OF SOLOMON & ASSOCIATES, Silver 

Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant 

Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, 

Paul T. Cygnarowicz, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Tewodros G. Abayneh, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, 

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his 

applications for relief from removal. 

 Abayneh first challenges the determination that he 

failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal 

of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien 

“must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that 

no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear 

of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 

(1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude 

that Abayneh fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary 

result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Abayneh cannot 

meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. 

Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v.

Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Finally, we uphold 

the finding below that Abayneh failed to demonstrate that it is 

more likely than not that he would be tortured if removed to 

Ethiopia. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2008). 

 Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

 

2 
3 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
LASERSIGHT INCORPORATED

                                                                      Exhibit 32


      Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

      Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as created  by Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  LaserSight
Incorporated (the "Company") does hereby certifythat:

      1. The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the  quarterly
      period  ended  March  31,  2005 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
      requirements  of Section 13(a) or Section  15(d),  as  applicable,  of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



                                                / S Danghui ("David") Liu
Dated: April 25, 2005
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Danghui ("David") Liu,
                                                     Chief Executive Officer



                                                 / S Dorothy M. Cipolla
Dated: April 25, 2005
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                       Dorothy M. Cipolla,
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

      The  certifications  set forth  above are being  furnished  as an  exhibit
solely  pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United  States
Code,  and shall not be deemed to be "filed"  for  purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  nor  shall  they  be  deemed
incorporated  by reference in any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1934,  as
amended.

      A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 1350, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement required by Section 1350, has been provided to LaserSight Incorporated
and will be retained by LaserSight  Incorporated and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Notice; correction

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Aviation Administration, in cooperation with the National Park Service, published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on November 2, 2023, announcing the opportunity for the public to comment on the results of the FAA's efforts to identify historic properties, evaluate the properties' significance, and assess the undertaking's effects on them as part of the development of Air Tour Management Plan for Canyon de Chelly National Monument pursuant to the National Parks Air Tour Management Act of 2000 and its implementing regulations. The document contained an incorrect date regarding the comment deadline for the Consultation Documents for Public Comment Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Sandra Fox, (202) 267-0928,                         *Sandra.Y.Fox@faa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of November 2, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-24191, on page 75364, in the second column, correct the                     **DATES**                     caption to read: DATES: Any member of the public is encouraged to provide views on this project to the agencies. The agencies will accept and consider comments related to section 106. Comments must be received on or before December 4, 2023, by 11:59 MDT. Comments will be received on the PEPC website. The Park's website link is                     *https://parkplanning.nps.gov/​CACHATMP.*

Issued in Washington, DC, on November 28, 2023.

Sandra Fox,

Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA Office of Environment & Energy.

[FR Doc. 2023-26605 Filed 12-4-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seen on Screen TV Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Antoine Jarjour, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 20th day of November, 2012.








ANTOINE JARJOURAntoine JarjourChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES v. BROWN.

No. 4527.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Nov. 6, 1939.

Young M. Smith, Atty., Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C. (Claud N. Sapp, U. S. Atty., of Columbia, S. C., Julius C. Martin, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, D. C., and Wilbur C. Pickett, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for appellant

Sam J. Royall, of Florence, S. C. (Royall & Wright, of Florence, S. C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, NORTHCOTT, and SOPER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the government in a war risk insurance case. The policy of insurance was continued in force by payment of premiums until October 1, 1919, and the only question in the case was whether insured had become totally and permanently disabled on or before that date. The trial judge denied a motion by the government for a directed verdict and directed verdict for the plaintiff.

The insured had influenza in 1918 while serving over seas. He was discharged from the army August 27, 1919. When he arrived home his physical condition was bad and within two or three weeks he was stricken with what was diagnosed as an attack of pleurisy. He did not recover but continued to have a hacking cough and night sweats. He was unable to work and spent a large part of his time in bed. He continued to grow worse and in April 1921 was operated on for empyema, or pus in the thoracic cavity. The physician at this time made a positive diagnosis of tuberculosis and shortly thereafter insured was taken to a government hospital, where he continued to grow worse and finally died on June 3, 1923.

A history of insured’s illness, showing probable origin in influenza, the development of pleurisy so soon after his discharge from the army and a steady decline in health notwithstanding his refraining from work, is substantial evidence, we think, from which the jury might have inferred that insured had tuberculosis during the life of the policy and that it was of such character or had reached such stage at that time as to constitute total and permanent disability. The government’s motion for directed verdict was, therefore, properly denied. We do not think, however, that the evidence showed total and permanent disability during the life of the policy so conclusively as to warrant the direction of a verdict for plaintiff, and the judgment must he reversed and a new trial granted for that reason. Under the New Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. *402following section 723c, motion of both sides for a directed verdict no longer amounts to a waiver of jury trial. Rule 50(a).

Reversed.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
America and History
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Constantino Brumidi

Location
      
Capitol Rotunda

The first panel contains the only allegorical figures in the frieze. America, wearing a liberty cap, stands in the center with her spear and shield. To her right sits an Indian maiden with a bow and arrows, representing the untamed American continent. Also at America's feet is a female figure representing History, who holds a stone tablet to record events as they occur. An American eagle perches on a fasces (a bundle of rods symbolizing the authority of government). The man in the background to their right is in the same pose as the prospector at the end of "Discovery of Gold in California," since artist Constantino Brumidi planned to have this scene connect with his last one.

About the Frieze of American History

The frieze in the Rotunda of the United States Capitol contains a painted panorama depicting significant events in American history. Thomas U. Walter's 1859 cross-section drawing of the new dome (constructed 1855-1863) shows a recessed belt atop the Rotunda walls with relief sculpture.

Eventually it was painted in true fresco, a difficult and exacting technique in which the pigments are applied directly onto wet plaster. As the plaster cures the colors become part of the wall. Consequently, each section of plaster must be painted the day it is laid. The frieze is painted in grisaille, a monochrome of whites and browns that resembles sculpture. It measures 8 feet 4 inches in height and approximately 300 feet in circumference. It starts 58 feet above the floor. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
25766

#### State v. Sniffen

Affirmed
23882

#### State v. Kahapea

Affirmed
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 15, 2022

No. 04-22-00429-CV

TEXAS FIRST RENTALS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

MONTAGE DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC and Derick Murway,

Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-CI-08101

Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After this court granted Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the brief, we 

set Appellant’s brief due on September 14, 2022. On the once-extended due date, Appellant 

filed an unopposed second motion for an extension of time to file the brief.

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on October 14, 2022. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of September, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
January 20, 1999

21148

#### Grattafiori v. State

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jerrold J. Pellizzon, Chief Financial Officer of Ceradyne, Inc. (the Company),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (as amended, the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|Dated: February 3, 2005 
|                        
|/s/ JERROLD J. PELLIZZON
|Jerrold J. Pellizzon    
|Chief Financial Officer
9 P.3d 512

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

August 30, 2000

22301

#### Napolean v. Condotech’s Hawaii Resort

Affirmed
Exhibit 10.1
 AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Amendment Company Executive
 WHEREAS Employment Agreement
 WHEREAS
 NOW THEREFORE
 1.
    
    Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is amended by replacing COO each time such word
appears with President and Chief Executive Officer.2.
    
    Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is amended by replacing the first two sentences with
the following:Executive shall report to and be subject to the direction of the Board of Directors (the
Board) of CHATT Holdings LLC (CHATT). Executive shall perform and discharge such duties
and responsibilities for the Company as the Board of CHATT may from time to time reasonably
assign Executive. Executive understands and acknowledges that such duties shall be subject
to revision and modification by the Board of CHATT, as appropriate, upon reasonable notice
to Executive.3.
    
    Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement is amended by replacing $241,020 with
$400,000.12.4.
    
    Section 4(b) of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:Discretionary Bonus. During the portion of the Employment Period beginning
September 29, 2008, Executive shall be eligible to receive an annual cash bonus in such
amount, if any, as determined by the Board of CHATT in its sole discretion based upon the
achievement of goals and objectives approved by the Board of CHATT. Subject to the
foregoing sentence, the target annual bonus is 100% of Executives Base Salary.




---



##### 



5.
    
    Section 9(b)(iii) of the Employment Agreement is amended by replacing COO with President
and Chief Executive Officer.6.
    
    Defined terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have meanings given them in the
Employment Agreement.7.
    
    This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to
be an original, but all of which counterparts collectively shall constitute one and the same
instrument.8.
    
    Except as amended hereby, all of the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement are
hereby ratified and confirmed, and shall remain in full force and effect.
 
 2




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 AMES TRUE TEMPER, INC.
    
    
    
    EXECUTIVEBy:
    
    /s/ David M. Nuti
    
    
    
    /s/ Duane R. GreenlyName: David M. NutiTitle: Chief Financial Officer
    
    
    
    Duane R. Greenly
 3