66798 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Notices 

and make recommendations to the 

Secretary and the Secretary of Health 

and Human Services on matters relating 

to the administration of the OSH Act. 

Under the OSH Act, Congress intended 

NACOSH to be a continuing advisory 

committee of indefinite duration. 

NACOSH operates in accordance with 

the Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(FACA) (5 U.S.C. App. 2) and OSHA’s 

regulations on NACOSH (29 CFR part 

1912a). Pursuant to FACA and its 

implementing regulations (41 CFR 102– 

3), the NACOSH charter must be 

renewed every two years. The charter 

expires two years from the date it is 

signed and filed. 

To read or download a copy of the 

new NACOSH charter, go to Docket No. 

OSHA–2010–0012 at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal. The charter also is 

available on the NACOSH page on 

OSHA’s Web page at http:// 

www.osha.gov and at the OSHA Docket 

Office, N–2625, U.S. Department of 

Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 

693–2350. In addition, the charter may 

be viewed or downloaded at the Federal 

Advisory Committees Database at 

http://www.fido.gov. 

Authority and Signature 

David Michaels, PhD, MPH, Assistant 

Secretary of Labor for Occupational 

Safety and Health, directed the 

preparation of this notice under the 

authority granted by Sections 6(b) and 

7(a) of the Occupational Safety and 

Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 655, 656), 

the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 

U.S.C. App. 2), 29 CFR part 1912a, 41 

CFR 102–3, and Secretary of Labor’s 

Order 4—2010 (75 FR 55355 (9/10/ 

2010)). 

Signed at Washington, DC, on October 26, 

2010. 

David Michaels, 

Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational 

Safety and Health. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27439 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–72,743] 

Ormet Primary Aluminum Corporation 

Including On-Site Temporary Workers, 

Hannibal, OH; Notice of Revised 

Determination on Reconsideration 

By application dated March 11, 2010, 

a company official requested 

administrative reconsideration of the 

Department’s negative determination 

regarding eligibility for workers and 

former workers of Ormet Primary 

Aluminum Corporation, including onsite temporary workers, Hannibal, Ohio 

(subject firm) to apply for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

The initial investigation, initiated 

November 3, 2009, resulted in a 

negative determination, issued on 

February 16, 2010, that was based on 

the finding that imports did not 

contribute importantly to worker 

separations at the subject firm and no 

shift in production to a foreign country 

occurred. The notice of negative 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on March 12, 2010 (75 

FR 11925). 

To support the request for 

reconsideration, the petitioner supplied 

additional information regarding overall 

United States production, consumption, 

and importation of primary and 

secondary aluminum to supplement that 

which was gathered during the initial 

investigation. 

During the reconsideration 

investigation, the Department of Labor 

examined the petitioner’s allegations 

and obtained current aggregate data on 

aluminum production and imports 

through 2009 which was not available 

during the original investigation period. 

An analysis of that data shows that 

the ratio of U.S. imports to U.S. 

shipments of aluminum (primary and 

secondary) increased significantly from 

2008 to 2009, reaching a level well over 

100 percent in 2009. This increased 

reliance on aggregate imports of 

aluminum contributed importantly to 

the layoffs at the subject facility. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the additional 

facts obtained on reconsideration, I 

determine that workers of Ormet 

Primary Aluminum Corporation, 

including on-site temporary workers, 

Hannibal, Ohio, who were engaged in 

employment related to the production of 

primary aluminum, meet the worker 

group certification criteria under 

Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 

272(a). In accordance with Section 223 

of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, I make the 

following certification: 

‘‘All workers of Ormet Primary Aluminum 

Corporation, including on-site temporary 

workers, Hannibal, Ohio, who became totally 

or partially separated from employment on or 

after October 27, 2008, through two years 

from the date of this certification, and all 

workers in the group threatened with total or 

partial separation from employment on date 

of certification through two years from the 

date of certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 

amended.’’ 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 21st day of 

October, 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27384 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 

Copyright Royalty Board 

[Docket No. 2010–6 CRB CD 2008] 

Distribution of the 2008 Cable Royalty 

Funds 

AGENCY: Copyright Royalty Board, 

Library of Congress. 

ACTION: Notice requesting comments. 

SUMMARY: The Copyright Royalty Judges 

are soliciting comments on a motion of 

Phase I claimants for partial distribution 

in connection with the 2008 cable 

royalty funds. The Judges are also 

requesting comments as to the existence 

of Phase I and Phase II controversies 

with respect to the distribution of 2008 

cable royalty funds. 

DATES: Comments are due on or before 

November 29, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent 

electronically to crb@loc.gov. In the 

alternative, send an original, five copies, 

and an electronic copy on a CD either 

by mail or hand delivery. Please do not 

use multiple means of transmission. 

Comments may not be delivered by an 

overnight delivery service other than the 

U.S. Postal Service Express Mail. If by 

mail (including overnight delivery), 

comments must be addressed to: 

Copyright Royalty Board, P.O. Box 

70977, Washington, DC 20024–0977. If 

hand delivered by a private party, 

comments must be brought to the 

Library of Congress, James Madison 

Memorial Building, LM–401, 101 

Independence Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20559–6000. If 

delivered by a commercial courier, 

comments must be delivered to the 

Congressional Courier Acceptance Site 

located at 2nd and D Street, NE., 

Washington, DC. The envelope must be 

addressed to: Copyright Royalty Board, 

Library of Congress, James Madison 

Memorial Building, LM–403, 101 

Independence Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20559–6000. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard Strasser, Senior Attorney, or 

Gina Giuffreda, Attorney Advisor, by 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Notices 66799 

1The ‘‘Phase I Parties’’ are the Program Suppliers, 

Joint Sports Claimants, Public Television 

Claimants, Commercial Television Claimants 

(represented by National Association of 

Broadcasters), Music Claimants (represented by 

American Society of Composers, Authors and 

Publishers, Broadcast Music, Inc., and SESAC, Inc.), 

Canadian Claimants, National Public Radio, and the 

Devotional Claimants. In Phase I of a cable royalty 

distribution proceeding, royalties are allocated 

among certain categories of broadcast programming 

that have been retransmitted by cable systems. The 

categories have traditionally been movies and 

syndicated television series, sports programming, 

commercial and noncommercial broadcaster-owned 

programming, religious programming, music, public 

radio programming, and Canadian programming. In 

Phase II of a cable royalty distribution proceeding, 

royalties are allocated among claimants within each 

of the Phase I categories. 

1The ‘‘Phase I Claimants’’ are the Program 

Suppliers, Joint Sports Claimants, Broadcaster 

Claimants Group, Music Claimants (American 

Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, 

Broadcast Music, Inc., and SESAC, Inc.), and 

Devotional Claimants. In Phase I of a satellite 

royalty distribution proceeding, royalties are 

allocated among certain categories of broadcast 

programming that have been retransmitted by 

satellite systems. The categories have traditionally 

been movies and syndicated television series, sports 

programming, commercial broadcaster-owned 

programming, religious programming, and music. 

Public Television Claimants, Canadian Claimants, 

and National Public Radio, which traditionally have 

received Phase I shares of cable royalties, do not 

claim Phase I shares of the satellite royalty funds. 

In Phase II of a satellite royalty distribution 

proceeding, royalties are allocated among claimants 

within each of the Phase I categories. 

telephone at (202) 707–7658 or e-mail at 

crb@loc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Each year 

cable systems must submit royalty 

payments to the Register of Copyrights 

as required by the statutory license set 

forth in section 111 of the Copyright Act 

for the retransmission to cable 

subscribers of over-the-air television 

and radio broadcast signals. See 17 

U.S.C. 111(d). These royalties are then 

distributed to copyright owners whose 

works were included in a qualifying 

transmission and who timely filed a 

claim for royalties. Allocation of the 

royalties collected occurs in one of two 

ways. In the first instance, these funds 

will be distributed through a negotiated 

settlement among the parties. 17 U.S.C. 

111(d)(4)(A). If the claimants do not 

reach an agreement with respect to the 

royalties, the Copyright Royalty Judges 

(‘‘Judges’’) must conduct a proceeding to 

determine the distribution of any 

royalties that remain in controversy. 17 

U.S.C. 111(d)(4)(B). 

On September 22, 2010, 

representatives of the Phase I claimant 

categories (the ‘‘Phase I Parties’’) 1 filed 

with the Judges a motion requesting a 

partial distribution of 50% of the 2008 

cable royalty funds pursuant to Section 

801(b)(3)(C) of the Copyright Act. 17 

U.S.C. 801(b)(3)(C). Under that section 

of the Copyright Act, before ruling on a 

partial distribution motion the Judges 

must publish a notice in the Federal 

Register seeking responses to the 

motion to ascertain whether any 

claimant entitled to receive such royalty 

fees has a reasonable objection to the 

proposed distribution. Consequently, 

this Notice seeks comments from 

interested claimants on whether any 

reasonable objection exists that would 

preclude the distribution of 50% of the 

2008 cable royalty funds to the Phase I 

Parties. The Judges must be advised of 

the existence and extent of all such 

objections by the end of the comment 

period. The Judges will not consider any 

objections with respect to the partial 

distribution motion that come to their 

attention after the close of that period. 

The Judges also seek comment on the 

existence and extent of any 

controversies to the 2008 cable royalty 

funds at Phase I or Phase II with respect 

to those funds that would remain if the 

partial distribution is granted. 

The Motion of Phase I Claimants for 

Partial Distribution is posted on the 

Copyright Royalty Board Web site at 

http://www.loc.gov/crb. 

Dated: October 20, 2010. 

James Scott Sledge, 

Chief U.S. Copyright Royalty Judge. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27332 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1410–72–P 

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 

Copyright Royalty Board 

[Docket No. 2010–7 CRB SD 2008] 

Distribution of the 2008 Satellite 

Royalty Funds 

AGENCY: Copyright Royalty Board, 

Library of Congress. 

ACTION: Notice requesting comments. 

SUMMARY: The Copyright Royalty Judges 

are soliciting comments on a motion of 

Phase I claimants for partial distribution 

in connection with the 2008 satellite 

royalty funds. The Judges are also 

requesting comments as to the existence 

of Phase I and Phase II controversies 

with respect to the distribution of 2008 

satellite royalty funds. 

DATES: Comments are due on or before 

November 29, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent 

electronically to crb@loc.gov. In the 

alternative, send an original, five copies, 

and an electronic copy on a CD either 

by mail or hand delivery. Please do not 

use multiple means of transmission. 

Comments may not be delivered by an 

overnight delivery service other than the 

U.S. Postal Service Express Mail. If by 

mail (including overnight delivery), 

comments must be addressed to: 

Copyright Royalty Board, P.O. Box 

70977, Washington, DC 20024–0977. If 

hand delivered by a private party, 

comments must be brought to the 

Library of Congress, James Madison 

Memorial Building, LM–401, 101 

Independence Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20559–6000. If 

delivered by a commercial courier, 

comments must be delivered to the 

Congressional Courier Acceptance Site 

located at 2nd and D Street, NE., 

Washington, DC. The envelope must be 

addressed to: Copyright Royalty Board, 

Library of Congress, James Madison 

Memorial Building, LM–403, 101 

Independence Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20559–6000. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard Strasser, Senior Attorney, or 

Gina Giuffreda, Attorney Advisor, by 

telephone at (202) 707–7658 or e-mail at 

crb@loc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 6, 2010, representatives of the 

Phase I claimant categories (the ‘‘Phase 

I Claimants’’) 1 filed with the Judges a 

motion requesting a partial distribution 

of 50% of the 2008 satellite royalty 

funds pursuant to section 801(b)(3)(C) of 

the Copyright Act. 17 U.S.C. 

801(b)(3)(C). That section requires that 

the Judges publish a notice in the 

Federal Register seeking responses to 

the motion for partial distribution to 

ascertain whether any claimant entitled 

to receive such fees has a reasonable 

objection to the requested distribution 

before ruling on the motion. 

Consequently, this Notice seeks 

comments from interested claimants on 

whether any reasonable objection exists 

that would preclude the distribution of 

50% of the 2008 satellite royalty funds 

to the Phase I Claimants. The Judges 

must be advised of the existence and 

extent of all such objections by the end 

of the comment period. The Judges will 

not consider any objections with respect 

to the partial distribution motion that 

come to their attention after the close of 

that period. 

The Judges also seek comment on the 

existence and extent of any 

controversies to the 2008 satellite 

royalty funds at Phase I or Phase II with 

respect to those funds that would 

remain if the motion for partial 

distribution is granted. 

The Motion of the Phase I Claimants 

for Partial Distribution is posted on the 

Copyright Royalty Board Web site at 

http://www.loc.gov/crb. 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES