• Check that the Confidence Level is indicated as "95%." If it is not, click on 

Confidence Level, then key in 95 in the adjacent cell. 

• Choose where you want the results to be displayed. If you click on the icon in the 

Output Range cell, you must select a cell in tile spreadsheet where you want the first 

cell of the results to appear and press enter. If you click on New Worksheet Ply, a 

new worJ<sheet will be inserted with the results displayed. If you click on New 

Workbook, a new workbook will be created with the results displayed. Selecting the 

other options, such as Labels and Residuals, provides additional results, but is not 

necessary for checking the data for bias. 

• After deciding where you want dte results displayed, click OK. 

The results will then he displayed in the selected location (starting in the cell you indicated for 

Output Range, new worksheet, or uew workbook). Figure Z.2-4 shows the outpm for the 

Example Problem A. The last two lines of the results pet1ain to the regression line intercept and 

the slope (labeled as "X Variable 1"). The lower and upper limits of the 95 percent confidence 

interval are displayed several columns to the right of the intercept and slope. If the confidence 

interval for the in tercept includes the value 0, and the confidence interval for the slope includes 

the value 1, the data satisfy the bias criteria. 

f.l&t« ~~ ,....__ ~O:IIIb )),y !;JJb 

rb 6il •l2& · ,, Itt <1 .-"# · .. .t: H O tt1 tmY.. }"og-~v (i) • 

.... " • )0 • s ' u ; :w-. m • "' . ~ ~ ~ fF: _ . (;t . o + 1 

f. SIJ~WAAY UJ a.. &.dol 

A e c o E o 1 ~~'ARY a.mocn , 

~ &£~~ StM'Ml':ll A Mllt;le R 0:93E 

s Sq~ t O.W.: 6 A4;vtttHPSi!vtrt O.W.C 

1 Slltt~ rtl ftf h ll1'il: 

S lo*l; ~ 

• IO NO/A 

11 dl ss 12 ~«or~' n 1 1.di 13 .~! ll 8.11$ 

"" 1.di 

""" 

, - _ l - <1.• . 

1

1

IS 

,.~,; 6 

7 III~I"

;;::::~~ J( ~~

OMi 

., ,. S1~~·~0t.v;t 

.378 

·~~~~~~;:~~~ lSt.H 

U 13 

Pw~c 

O.IGS 

!m(. 

O.Xtl ~~U'Nf>'~ I:Jn 

~~~!IS"' 

-fJ..a;t) 

~~(( !15-G% 

l:ul 

~ 16 X\"'oriKIP I (lh)4 0 (e) :2:3~ 2 S~:S- S. 0.~ 1.003 Oro& IOOl ,. 

,. 

,, 

21 

Zl 

" ,. 

,. 

71 

,. 

.. 

"' 

~>"' -~. • 11 \ :~ oir.~o f~~ l. ~011\-t >..~•OUit~uc ,{f~ M t.V.., ~ 

-

Figure Z.2-4. Output of Excel Regression Analysis for Example Pt'oblem A. 

Z-22 

" ..,. 

VESOlOOOO 
Appendix A 

Student's T-Distribution 

A· I 

VE$010001 
Student's T-Distribution: One-Sided at 95% Confidence lnten•al 

Number of pairs (n) Degrees of freedom Student's t,.,. value 

8 6 2.447 

9 7 2.365 ----· ·-!---·"·· ··-___ , ......... --···---

10 8 2.306 

Ll 9 2.262 

12 10 2.228 

13 I I l 2.201 

14 12 ! 2. 179 

15 13 ! 2.160 - 16 14 2.145 

17 15 2.131 

18 16 2.120 -··--------·-·-·· ·---- 19 17 2.1 10 

20 18 2.101 

21 19 2.093 

22 20 2.086 

23 21 2.080 

- --------·-· 24 22 1-----]..:.074 - -·· ... ------·-- --- 25 23 2.069 

26 24 2.064 

27 25 2.060 

28 26 2.056 

29 27 i 2.052 

30 28 ' 2.048 --· ---·-·- -- -----·····-- 31 29 2.045 

32 30 2.042 

33 31 2.040 

34 32 2.037 

35 33 2.035 

______36 ______ ......__ - 34 2.032 -- 37 35 2.030 

38 36 2.028 

39 37 2.026 - ·-····· ---- -- - 40 38 2.024 

41 39 2.023 

42 40 ! 2.021 

43 41 I 

' 2.020 

44 42 i 2.018 

(continue.d) 

A-2 

VES010002 
Student's T-Distribution (continued) 

Number of pairs (o) Degrees of freedom Student's ....... value 

45 43 2.017 

46 44 2.015 --···- ··-- 47 45 2.014 

48 46 2.013 

49 47 2.012 ,.,., ...... - ·-·· 50 48 2.01) 

51 49 2.010 

52 50 2.009 --- - ·--· 53 51 2.008 

54 52 2.007 

55 53 2.006 

56 54 2.005 

57 55 2.004 

58 56 2.003 

59 57 2.002 

60 58 2.002 

61 59 2.001 

62 60 2.000 

63 61 2.000 

64 62 i 1.999 

65 63 ! 1.998 

66 64 ! 1.998 

67 65 1.997 

68 66 1.997 

69 67 1.996 

70 68 1.995 

71 69 1.995 

72 70 1.994 

73 71 1.994 

74 72 1.993 

75 73 1.993 

76 74 1.993 

77 75 1.992 

78 76 1.992 

79 77 1.991 

80 78 1.991 

A-3 

VES010003 
VES010004.pdf 
Notes from Meeting w ith Veolia on Pre-draft of Title V Renewal 

Attendees: 

September 30, 2014 

9:30am 

EPA: Genevieve Damico, Andrea Morgan, David Ogulel, and Jar>e Woolums 

Veolia: Jeff Everett, Doug Harris, Joe Kellmeyer, Ryan Kemper, David Klarich, Greg Sledor and Dennis 

Warchol 

Veolla's Comments on the Fact Sheet 

Add an 's' to 'baghouse' 

Veolia provided a list of their suggested revisions to the fact sheet, and stated that the majority 

were self-explanatory and there was no need to walk through them at the meeting. 

One concern highlighted was the phrase, "emit large amounts of pollution• in terms of Title V 

applicability. Veolia does not b<!lieve it emits large amounts of pollution and is subject to Title V 

because it is subject to a MACT. 

Comments on t he Statement of Basis ISOBI 

Veolla Is concerr>ed by language that Implies that incinerators 2 and 3 are similar. They note that 

they are distinct units and burn different types of materials. Additionally, there is a vertical duct 

on unit 2 that results in a different cyclonic flow. 

Veolla also stated that there were some minor errors present In the SOB (le. misrepresentation 

of the size of a tank, and NEIC acronym was incorrectly defined) 

Veolla will make comments during the public comment period 

Veolia has concerns as to the fact that the inadequate FAP was used as justification for the 

CEMS and then both revisions to the FAP and CEMS were required in the permit. They find this 

link to be unclear and believe that the inadequate FAP should only b<! used to j ustify and 

enhanced FAP or the CEMS, not both. 

Comments on Title y Permit 

The requirement for a CEMS 

o Veolia notes that to their knowledge no facility in the US or world is currently operating 

a multi-metals CEMS. 

o Veolia notes that they have received affidavits from operators who had used a multimetal CEMS and states they do not work. 

o Veolla expressed concerns that the requirement to operate a CEMS would render the 

facility non-viable against Its competitors. 

o Veolla suggests that the i ssues EPA Identified with the FAP are not unique to Veolia and 

the justification EPA uses to require a multi-metal CEMS applies to all hazardous waste 

1 

VESOI0004 
incinerators. Therefore, all HWC should be required to operate a multi·metal CEMS 

through a MACT revision. 

o Doug Harris states that he would be unable to sign a compliance certification for the 

fadlity if multi-metal CEMS were required because he does not believe the instrument 

works. 

o Veolia expressed concerns about lack of a competitive market for CEMS and its ethical 

concerns regarding the fact that they believe it is essentially a sole-source contract. 

o Veolia expressed safety concerns when deviations occur 

• Waste may begin to react if it is not burned to completion 

• Veolia burns some controlled substances that they are not allowed to store, 

they would violate those rules if they were to have to stop incinerating due to a 

deviation. 

• If a deviation occurred while something in the blending tank was being burned, 

Veolia states that the tank farm would e.ssentially be shut down since it would 

no longer be able to feed to another incinerator and would prevent other tanks 

from being emptied. 

• Veolia believes most tanks contain at least some amount of heavy 

metals. 

• The standard is 12 ho urs, Veolia disagrees wit h a deviation being determined 

after 15 minutes of data and expressed averaging time concern . 

o Veolia believes that deviation could be defined more clearly in the permit. 

o Additionally Veolia is concerned that 3 CEMS are proposed in the renewal rather than 

the 1 CEMS proposed in the reopening. 

o Veolia indicates that on average, they have scheduled shutdowns once every 6·9 

months and the shutdowns last for 7·9 days. However, the other two incinerators are 

operational whenever the one Is shutdown. 

The FAP 

o Veolia requested to have the technical staff meet separately to discuss the FAP 

• They believe they have an improved feed stream analysis 

• Will schedule a meeting with Veolia to discuss 

o Veolia currently has 2 ICP's (and has a third on order) and 41ndirect Mercury Analyzers. 

o Veolla stated that the NEIC report was Informative and they have made changes as a 

result 

o They no longer along generators to use a standard profile for waste that contains heavy 

metals. 

The NOx, so,, Opacity, and VOM testing during CPT 

Veolla has no objection to doing initial baseline testing 

Veolia would prefer this be a one· time test at a separate time from the CPT test, 

suggested during confirmatory testing for difuran 

Veolia would be willing to replicate the parameter of the CPT testing for the other 

testing 

Doug Harris stated that he does not believe that the NOx, so,, Opacity, and VOM testing 

would threaten the viability ofVeolla. 

2 

VES010005 
Hospital M edical Infectious Waste 

Veolia does not burn hospital medical infe<:tious waste and does not anticipate burning 

it since it is not cost effective. However, they do have an IL permit that would allow 

them to burn it, they just currently choose not to. 

They would like the prohibition to burn hospital medical infectious waste removed from 

their permit in case they change their mind and would like to burn it in the future. 

EPA explained that prohibition-was added to the permit so they would have a nonapplicability determination and shield. The provision could be removed but Veolia 

would then lose It shield. Additionally, Veolla could always apply for a revision to burn it 

should they decide to burn It In the future. 

Veolia stated that they would need to discuss the matter further internally. 

3 

VES010006 
VES010007.pdf 
Comments on the Title V Permit 

Fact Sheet 

• Background Section, Paragraph 1 

Title V permits are required for all incinerators that are regulated under 

Subpart EEE not because the facility emits large amounts of pollution. 

Also the permit regulates emissions specified by regulation not the amount 

of pollution the facility can emit. 

• Background Section, Paragraph 2 

This paragraph is not relevant to this renewal permit so why have this 

paragraph in the Fact Sheet 

• Burning Hazardous Waste, Paragraph 4 

Modify second sentence to read "Carbon adsorption units are attached to 

each tank to help control emissions." Delete "gases occasionally escape 

from the tanks." 

• Burning Hazardous Waste, Paragraph 5 

Modify to· state "is maintained at'negatilie pressure to minimize emissions" 

instead of "is maintained at negative pressure so emissions don't escape." 

• Burning Hazardous Waste, Paragraph 5 

Reword last sentence to read uBefore some containerized waste is 

incinerated it Is packaged into more manageable containers." 

• Burning Hazardous Waste, Paragraph 7 

Last Line. Should state "bag houses" not a "bag house" and delete "which 

help control air pollution." 

• Burning Hazardous Waste, Paragraph 8 

First sentence, delete "to further help control air pollution." 

• Burning Hazardous Waste, Paragraph 9 

Second sentence, delete "as lime is an important material in this air 

pollution control technology." 

VES010007 
VES01 0008.pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subj ect: 

Attachments: 

Damico, Genevieve 

Monday, June 10, 2013 3:20PM 

Woolums, Jane; Ogulei, David; Morgan, Andrea; Mooney. John 

FW:Veolia 

Leiter to Genevieve Damico, USEPA.PDF 

From: Kellmeyer, Joseph [mailto:JKELLMEYER@thompsoncoburn.com] 

Sent Monday, June 10, 2013 3:06 PM 

To: Damico, Genevieve; Czerniak, George 

Cc: Ke!lmeyer, Joseph; Kemper, Ryan Russell 

Subject: Veolla 

Dear Genevieve -

Attached e~~se find correspondence relating to your meeting 1vith Veolia las! week 1 would appreciate someone giving 

me a call relating to !he issues discussed therein. 

Thanks. 

Joseph M. Kellmeyer 

Jke!lmevet@thompsonooburn.oom 

P: 314.552.6166 

F: 314.552.7166 

M: 314.602.6166 

Thompson Coburn LLP 

One US Bank Plaza 

Sl. Louis, MO 63101 

www lhompsoncoburo com 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This.mes~age and a1'{ anachments are lrom a Jaw firm. They are s·ofeiy fOJ !he use of the intended •-ecipient and moryconlai's 

prtvl!eged, confidential or cullet !egftlly JlfO(P.Cte(llnformaliOn 1r you t'lre nm tile inrended roclpie.\1, please <Jcstroy all oocies !A\l!lOOI .-e<)(ltng or <II!J¢IQ$ing tllt'!lr 

conil;!nts and nodfy the sen.der <1f the error by reply e·ma!l 

fAX DI$CLO$URE Tl"le IRS 1eQo1res Ulat we inform you lhalMy US . fcdtml tax adv.J:lO 1n thi& mcsst;ge (i11clvclrng any atl.actJucntsJ iS: not mtet~ded <r w11Uen to 

be used. anj .zernol be used. to (I) avoid any pooa!I!E!s under lhe lntemal Reven.-e Code or (h) PfOI'IlOle. macl<et or recommend to ~nother party any ltansadion:. 

anangemenl y other maliar 

VES010008 
VES010009.pdf 
~THO PSON r• cosuRN LLP 

JO$eph M. Keilmeyer 

p 314.552.6166 

F 314.S52.7166 

jketlme)·er@thompsoncobum.com 

June 10, 2013 

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Genevieve Damico 

Region 5 

77 W. Jackson Boulevard (A-ISJ) 

Chicago, Illinois 60604-3509 

Re: USEPA's Proposed Reopening of Air Pollution Control Title V Permit 

Dear Genevieve: 

I appreciate you and other members of the United States Environmental Protection Agency 

(~USEPA" or "Agency") meeting with my client, Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

(''Veolia'') on June 5, 2013 ("Meeting"). 

During the Meeting, Veolia and USEPA discussed the ramifications should Veolia appeal the 

Agency's reopening ofVeolia's Air Pollution Control Title V Permit or any terms or conditions 

related thereto (collectively "Conditions") to the Environmental Appeals Board ("EAB") and the 

EAB denied the petition or granted review of the petition and subsequently issued an order on 

the merits relating thereto. Veolia expressed the view that the EAB's decision becomes final 

Agency action and the Conditions must be implemented even ifVeolia appealed the EAB action 

to the Seventh Circuit, absent additional relief from the EAB or the Seventh Circuit which would 

delay the implementation of such Conditions during the pendency of the appeal to the Seventh 

Circuit ln response, US EPA expressed the view that requiring Veolia to implement such 

Conditions during the pendency of an appeal to the Seventh Circuit was neither USEPA's intent 

nor was implementation of such Conditions required by the law. 

For the sake of clarity, Veolia was relying primarily upon 40 C.F.R. § 71.1 I and various other 

authorities in forming its belief that additional relief would be needed following an EAB decision 

in order to avoid Veolia being required to implement the Conditions during tbe pendency of an 

appeal to the Seventt Circuit Veolia is prepared to defer to USEPA's opinion as expressed 

during the Meeting - specifically, should V eolia appeal the Agency's reopening of V eolia's Air 

Pollution Control Title V Permit or Conditions to the EAB and the EAB deny the petition or 

grant review of the petition and subsequently issue an order on the merits relating thereto, the 

law does not require Veolia to implement such Conditions during the pendency of an appeal of 

the EAB action to the Seventh Circuit In deferring to USEPA's opinion, Veolia simply wishes 

to ensure its rights are protected. In this regard, I would like to discuss USEPA's analysis further 

with you or your counsel. 

In any case, given USEPA's desire as expressed during the Meeting- to avoid Veolia 

implementing Conditions prior to the completion of Seventh Circuit judicial review, if such 

Thompson Cobum UP I Attorneys ot Low I One US Bonk Plozo I St. louis, Missouri 63101 

P 314.552.6000 IF 314.552.7000 I www.thompsoncobum.com 5749109 

VES010009 
June 10,2013 

Page 2 

review is desired, I believe the two parties can work together- if necessary, through an 

implementation schedule or otherwise- to avoid the unintended outcome ofVeolia being 

required to implement the Conditions prior to the completion of Seventh Circuit review. 

Please have someone from your office give me a call to discuss further at your convenience. 

Very truly yours, 

Thompson Coburn LLP 

Bv ~Jf . (j~t:( Ke!Jmeyer 

JlvfK/leb 

cc: George Czerniak, USEPA, Region 5 

Doug Harris 

5749109 

VESOIOOJO 
VES01 0011 .pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Hello David, 

David Moore <OallidM@cooperenvironmental.com> 

Wednesday, Apri 23, 2014 2:13PM 

Ogulei, David 

Cooper Environmental 

I j ust wanted to follow up to see if you were able to communicate with Dr. Fine at South Coast AQMD regarding our Xact 

systems in stack applications. Do you require any additional inform ation from us? 

Best regards, 

David Moore 

Director of Sales and Marketing 

Cooper Environmental Services LLC 

10180 SW Nimbus Ave. Suite J6 

Portland, OR 97223 

Phone #: 503-608·4444 

Mobile #: 503·970.8190 

Fax#: 503·624· 2120 

Email: OavldM@cooperenvironmental.com 

Website: www.cooperenwonmental.com 

VESOlOOll 
VES010012.pdf 
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGIONS 

77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD 

CHICAGO. ILI50604-3590 

,,· ' 

-tt.: SEP 1 1 ZV!3 • ;o. ~Y... ~ ~~~'1'"!~ ... .,~;.-'t." 

Douglas Harris, General Manager 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

7 Mobile A venue 

Sauget, lllinois 6220 I 

REPlY TO THEATIENTIONOF": 

Re: Notification of Incompleteness of 40 C.F.R. Part 71 Penni! Renewal Application 

Dear Mr. Harris: 

Tile U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has reviewed the application for renewal of a Clean 

Air Act (CAA) Title V permit that Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C., Sauget, Illinois 

(Veolia) submitted to EPA on AprilS and August 16, 2013. Veolia operates under a federal 

Title V Pennit to Operate No. V-IL-12716300103-08-01, which EPA issued on 

September 12, .2008, pursuant to Title V of the CAA and its implementing regulations at 

40 C.F.R Part 71.. \/eolia's permit expires on October 12, 2013. 

Completeness Determination 

Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 71.5(a)(2), EPA has determined that the information submitted in the 

·above referenced application is administratively complete. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. §§ 71.5 (a) 

(2) and 71.7(b), since we have deemed Veolia's permit application to be complete, Veolia is 

covered by an application shield, which allows Veolia to continue operating its facility even 

t11ough EPA has not yet issued Veolia's permit. Tliis application shield is in effect from the date 

of completeness until we have issued the final permit, provided Veolia submits any requested 

information by the specified deadlines. 

Please be av.'llre that the permit application shield does not mean we have already approved the 

requested permit, nor d_oes it mean that we have determined that you have adequately addressed 

compliance concerns in your application. The permit application shield means only that Veolia 

may operate its facility during the period until we have issued the final permil 

Recyc)edJ'Recyclable • Printed "ith Vegetst>le Oiil Based tM.s. on 100% Recyoeo Paper (100 ~ Con&(lmet) 

VES010012 
Duty to Provide Additional Information 

This application completeness determination does not constitute a thorough evaluation of the 

merits of the application. Pursuant to 40 C.P.R. § 7l.S(aX2), if we determine that additional 

information is necessary to evaluate the application or to take final action on it, we may request 

such information in writing and set a reasonable deadline for a response. 

Duty to Correct/Update Application 

Pursuant to 40 C.P.R.§ 71.5(b), if you find that you have omitted any relevant facts or have 

submitted incorrect information, you must promptly flle corrections to your application with our 

office. ln addition, if the facility becomes Subject to additional regulations before EPA makes a 

draft permit for this facility available for public comment, you must provide additional 

infonnatio'n to us addressing the new applicable requirements. 

This completeness detenninatinn does not affect your obligation to comply with all applicable 

requirements, including the lllinois State Implementation Plan, regardless of Title V pennit 

issuance. Furthennore, future changes at the facility, whether considered major or minor for 

construction permitting purposes, may necessitate updating your permit application. 

If you have any questions, please contact David Ogulei, of my staff, at (312) 353-0987. 

rely, .-, 

enevieve 

'fUc~Jt~ Damico 

Air Permits Section 

cc: Bob Bernoteit, Illinois EPA 

VESOI0013 
VES010014.pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

David, 

Dennis J Warchol <dennls.warchol@veoNaes.com> 

Tuesday, July 16, 201311:12 AM 

Ogulei, David 

Nancy L Paddock 

Title V Permit Application 

Can we call you at around 9 AM tomorrow to discuss your comments. I will have Nancy Paddock on the call who works 

for me and Kathy Strubberg our consultant who helped us with this application. If that time works, we will call you in 

your office. Thanks 

SERVICE FIRST SAfETY ALWAYS 

Dennis J. Warchol 

EHS Manager 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

Trade Waste Incineration Facalty 

#7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, IL 62201 

618-271-2804 (ext.169) 

618-271-2128 (fax) 

Dennis.warchoi@VeoliaES.com 

wvtv,,VeoliaES.com 

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 

contain confidential and prtvlleged Information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 

you are not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the 

original message and delete it from aU computers. 

) 

VES010014 
VES010015.pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Nancy L PaddOCk <nancy.paddocl<@veoliaes.com> 

Monday, December 09,2013 9:19AM 

Ogulel, David 

Dennis J Warchol 

RE: PTE and Actual Emlssioos 

AS Form PTE Summary%282 or 2%29rev5 (1).pdf 

Thank you, David. I wm take care or updating the table you sent />SAP. The revised PTE table is attadled to this message; the HAP PTE has been updated to 

reflect a total d29.44 TPY. The HAP PTE value In the August addendum was inaccurate due to a simple tabulation error. Is this a sutlldent elq)lanabon for the 

change? 

Thank you. 

Nancy Paddock 

Environmental Engineering Specialist 

Veojia ES Technical Solutions, LL.C. 

7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, IL 62201 

618.271.2804 (x-115) 

618.271.2128 (fax) 

Nancy.Paddock@VeqllaES,com 

www.VeoliaES.com 

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC. is for the sole use of the Intended redplent(s) and may contain confidendal and privileged 

lnfonnation. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by 

reply e·mail and destroy all copies of the original message and delete It from all computers. 

From: Ogulei, David (Ogulei.Davld@epa.gov) 

Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 9:01AM 

To: Nancy L Paddock 

Cc: Dennis J Warchol 

Subject: PTE and Actual Emissions 

Hi Nancy, 

Below is me rable we discussed today. As we discussed. could you provide me wiclt the data mar's missing from cltis cable? You may replace the table you 

currently have on page 18 of th~ addendum wilh this table. Also, please update dtc total HAPs value •• we discussed, ll!1d include an explanation for the 

update. Thanks! 

1 

VES010015 
Pollutant Potential to 2012 Actunl 2011 Actual 2010 Actual 2009 Actual 2008 Actual 

Emit (PTE) Emiss.ions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions 

PM 13.93 1.12 1.1 1.07 1.04 

PMoo 12.55 

PM2.1 

S02 66.19 0.49 0.49 0.52 0.496 

NOx 74.1 I 58.16 57.1 55.23 54.76 

VOM 15.63 1.51 1.62 1.74 1.7 

co 30.85 1.21 1.41 1.67 1.95 

Lead 0.0968 

Total HAPs 21.41 

Antimony (Sb) 

Arsenic (As) < 0.10 

Benzene < 0.40 

Beryllium (Be) < 0.05 

Cadmium (Cd) 

Chromium (Cr) 

Dioxins/Furans 

Hydrogen Chloride (HCI) 1.89 2.03 2.09 3.56 

lead 

Mercury (Hg) 0.055 

Nickel (Ni) 

Selenium (Se) 

Organic HAPs 

2 

VESOIOOI6 
David Oguld 

U.S. Hoviroomeotal Protection Agency 

Region 5 I Air & Rru:Uotion Division I A-18) 

77 West Jackson Blvd. 1 Chicab>O, Illinois 60604 

Phone: (312) 353-0987 1 Fax: (312) 692-2080 

Ogulci.Da,~d@cpa.gov 

3 

VES010017 
VES01 0018.pdf 
OMB Cont r 01 No 2060-0336 

U.S. EHVlRONMENTAl. PROTECTION AGENCY 

APPUCATION FOR FEDERAl. OPERATING PERMIT. 40 CFR PART 71 

FORM PTE • POTENTIAL TO EMIT SUMMARY 

INSTRUCTIONS: Complete this form o~ for thO faciity. You may find it helpful to COO'J)IGie totm EMISS for each GmisSlOn.s unit befo.-o 

completing this . FOf each emissions unit wi1h emissions thai count towards applicability, list the emissions unR tO and the 

PTE fOf the air pollutams lisl9d bGfow. It th«e are OU"'&r air poihAants not lsled below for whiCh tM source is a majOf source. 

provide attactune01s naming the air polutant 8nd showing ~;ab.l ioo of the total fOf that pollutant. ROUld values (O the nearest tenth of a ton. Add au values ~her in each coJOO\O and eoter the tO(al in the space pr<Mded at the bottom of the 

table. Also report these totals in section J of form GIS. 

Enissions UnitiO Re~:N ed Air Pollutants and Pollutan1s for which the Source ia Mator 

NOx voc S02 PM10 co 

(I=) 

HAP 

(tOMJYr) (looslyr) oonsi;r) (tons/yr) to~S/yr) ( (tonslyr) 

Tank60 0.0512 4.98E·05 

Tank 300 0.0287 2.71E·05 

Tank302 0. 1894 1.84E..Q4 

Tank 304 0.0567 5.45E.05 

Tank 306 0.0993 9.59E.05 

Tank 308 0.2218 2.14E..04 

Tank 310 0.2569 2.84£..()4 

Tank 312 0.3517 3.42£..()4 

Tank 314 0.21 17 2.05Jl..()4 

Bulk Solids Storage 2.56 O.OI ~R 

Fugitive Equipment Leaks 0.0738 0.0001 

Boiler I 4.51 0.248 0.027 0.343 3.79 

Emergeo4;y Genc.:r.ator # 1 0.441 O.Q35 0.029 0.031 0.095 0.0071 

Emergency GenetaUlr #2 0.441 0.035 0.029 0.031 0.095 0.0071 

TOTAlS 74.99 16.33 66.79 13.1 5 31.04 0.0968 29.44 

VES010018 
VES01 0019.pdf 
Discussion with Evonik DeGussa • MM CEMS [J 

s h M h 11 . . Jeff Ryan, Charles Hall, Dan Bivins, David 

ara ars a '

0 · Ogulei, Kim Garnett, Shannon Downey 10/0412012 08:58AM 

Cc: Sabrina Argentieri 

This message has been replied to and forwarded. 

I spoke with Theresa Rexall (sp?) at Evonik about the MM CEMS. She is happy to set up a call with the 

group to discuss what happened. She was not involved with MM CEMS at the time of operation but she 

will get the appropriate people who operated it to describe to us why they have ceased operating the 

CEMS. 

Generally, she said that there was a hard drive failure in 2009 whiCh was repaired and then a software 

failure in 2011 that they were unable to repair which would have required them to replace the system. 

Evonik got a quote from Pall for a new unit ($250,000 for the unit and $20,000 for the tape) and did a cost 

benefit analysis. They decided to not replace the unit since their waste is not variable and they did not 

see many spikes in metals and mercury while operating it. Evonik also had some problems with the 

sampling train. Those could be repaired but it added to the cost to get the MM CEMS running again. 

As for their waste analysis, they were not doing anything different while operating the MM CEMS so there 

was not a cost savings associated with waste analysis while operating the MM CEMS . 

We can set up a call in the next few weeks. If you are interested, please let me know your availability over 

the next two weeks. 

Thanks! 

Sarah Marshall 

Environmental Engineer 

Air Enforcement and Compliance Assurance BranCh 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 

312-886-6797 

Jeff Ryan Good morning everyone. I just wanted to let you ... 1010212012 07:47:38 AM 

From: 

To: 

Jeff Ryan/RTP/USEPAIUS 

Challes HaiVRSI\JSEPAIUS@EPA. Dan BivinsiRTPI\JSEPAIUS@EPA, David 

Ogulei/RSI\JSEPAIUS@EPA, Kim Gamett!RTPI\JSEPAIUS@EPA, Sarah 

Marshati/RS/USEPAIUS@EPA, 

Cc: 

Date: 

Richard H Lambert <lambef1_.richard_h@lilly.com>. Michael L Foste< <foster..michaeU@Iitly.corn> 

t 0/0212012 07:47AM 

Subject: Conference call with Eli Litty 

Good morning everyone. I just wanted to let you know that I have had a chat with Rick and Mike prior to 

our call today and I wanted to pass along some additional info. Mainly, that this conference call today is 

focused on technical issues. Rick and Mike can speak to their experiences w"h the system while they 

were responsible for its operation. I now know that they are no longer responsible for the incinerator and 

that Evonic DeGussa now owns and operates the facility (since 2010). As a result, our discussions are 

limited to the Ell Ully operations. 

Between Pall and Eli Lilly, several excellent papers and presentations have been provided. Initially, this 

is exaCIIy what you all were looking for. I hope everyone has had a Chance to go through them. In 

addition, I provided the links to the EPA documents that were produced specific to the alternative 

monitoring aspects. 

VES010019 
I hope this helps. 

Jeff 

Jeff Ryan 

U.S. Environmenlal Protection Agency 

Office of Research and Development 

National Risk Management Research Laboratory 

Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division 

Air Pollution Technology Branch 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Mail Drop E305·01 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

(919) 541·1437 (919) 541·0554 FAX 

"And all this science, I don't understand." 

"It's just my job 5 days a week" 

Elton John • Rocket Man 

VES010020 
VESO 1 0021. pdf 
APn - 1 2o1t 

(i)VEOLIA 

ENVIRONMENTAL SE:RViCES 

March 31, 2014 

Mr. David Ogulei 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Region S 

77 West Jackson Blvd 

Mall Code: AR-18J 

Chicago, ll 60604-3507 

Re: Veolia ES Tecl1nical Solutions, L.L.C. 

7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, IL 62201 

V-IL-1716300103-08.{)1 

(Fed-Ex'd) 

Certification for revisions to Trtle V Application for Renewal, August 2013 Addendum 

Dear Mr. Ogulei. 

Enclosed are revised pages lo the August 2013 Addendum to Veolia's Application for Title V renewal. 

These are hard copies of pages that have previously been submitted to you in electronic format. A 

signed Certifocation of Truth, Accuracy and Completeness (CTAC) EPA Form 5900-02 has also been 

included in lhls submitlal package. 

If you have questions on this submittal, please call me or Dennis Warchol at (618) 21-2804. 

Sincerely, 

Veolia ES Tecl1nical Solutions, L.L.C. 

Nancy L. Paddock 

Environmental Engineering Specialist 

Att. 

C: EPA File 

1#7 Mobil&· Avenue, Saugat. IL 62201 

(618) 271-2804 

WINW.v•ona.com 

VES010021 
ft EA~ United States - Environmental Protection · 

~jr' Agency OMB No. 2(16().()336, Approval Exvires 6/3012015 

Federal Operating Permit Program (40 CFR Part 7 1) 

CERTIFICATION OF TRUTH ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS (CTAC) 

This form must be completed, signed by the ' Responsible Official" designated for the 

facility or emission unit, and sent with each submission of documents (i.e .• application 

forms, updates to applications, reports, or any information required by a part 71 permit). 

A. Respons ible Offic ial 

Name: (Last) ....,~;l:iia rru;i~..... _______ (First) Douglas 

(MI) _ 

Title General Manager 

Street or P.O. Box _ _,#"'7'-M"""o,.bi.,le,...A.,.,e"' v n"' u,.e _____________ _ 

City Sauoet . State _IL_ . ZIP 62201 - ...lil§2. 

phone~ ..lZ1..- 2804 Ext. acsimile~ ..lZ1..-.l12a,. 

B. Certification of Truth, Accuracy and Completeness (to be signed by the 

responsible official) 

I certify under penalty of law, based on information and belief formed after 

reasonable inquiry, the statements and information contained in these documents 

are true, accurate and conlete. 

Name (signed) d>'a.u/M d~C> Name (typed) Doyqlas HarPs Date: _,2___ I 3 i I / 'f 

EPA Form 5900-02 

VES010022 
' ; 

; 

POLLUTANT PTE POLLUTANT PTE 

(tons/vrl {tons/yr) 

PM 12.62 BENZENE 0.36 

PM10 12.62 BERYLLIUM 0.04 

PM>..S 12.62 DIOXINIFURAN 9.97 x 10·

8 

so2 66.25 HCI/Ch 19.8 

NOx 74.99 LEAD 0.0968 

VOM{OZONE) 15.70 MERCURY 0.03 

co 31.04 METHANOL 0.4069 

TOTAL HAPS 21.4 NICKEL 0.0001 

ANTIMONY 0.0001 ORGANIC HAP 0.5287 COMPOm,."Ds 

ARSENIC 0.04 SELENIUM 0.0002 

The current facility's PTE is a summation of 1he potential to emit of each emission unit. 

B. Incinerators: Unit 2, Unit 3, and Unit 4 Emission Standard Requirements 

The regulations applicable to the incinerators are listed below. A listing of any nonapplicable requirements and the reasons for the non-applicability are provided in AppendLx 

B. 

1. VJSible Emissions 

a. Visible Emissions Limitations (35 lAC 212.123(a)] 

The emission of smoke or other particulate matter, with an opacity greater than 30 

percent, into the atmosphere from any emission source shall not be caused or allowed, 

except as allowed by 35 lAC 212.123(b) and 212.124. 

b. FugitivePartieulate Matter [35 lAC 212301 and 212.314] 

The facility sbitll not cause or allow the emission of fugitive particulate matter from 

any process, including any material handling or storage activity, that is visible by an 

observer looking generally overhead at a point beyond the property line of the source 

unless the wind speed is greater than 40.2 kilometers per hour (25 miles per hour.) 

except as described in 35 lAC 212.314. 

18 

VES010023 
. ....... 

I / 

B. List of Air Emission Sources with Regulatory Requirements 

Unit Name Unit Description 

Incineration Unit 2 Fixed Heartil Incineration Unit used in the destruction of 

b.u:ardous waste 

Incineration Unit 3 Fixed Hearth Incineration Unit used in the destruction of 

hazardous waste 

Incineration Unit 4 Rotary Kiln lneinerator (Tl'ansportable) used in the 

destruction of hazardous waste 

Material Processing Area I Material processing/repackaging, repackaging of 

containerized solid waste 

Material Processing Area 2 Material processing/repackaging, repackaging of 

containerized solid waste 

Lab Pack Repack Material processing/repackaging, repackaging of Lab Packs 

Drum Crusher Drums are crushed 

Bulk Feed Building Temporary storage of bulk solid wastes before being feed to 

Unit4 

Boiler 1 Steam Boiler used for steam generation at plant 

Tank#2 4,931-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank #4 4,931-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank #6 7,200-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank #8 5,820-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank #10 12,869-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank #20 I 2,869-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank#30 12,869-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank#40 12,869-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank #50 12,869-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank #60 12,869-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank#300 19,850-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank #302 30,000-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank #304 30,000-gallon tank used for tho storage of liquid waste 

Tank #306 30,000-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank#308 30,000-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank #3 10 30,000-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank #312 I 0,000-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank #314 I 0,000-gallon tank used for the storage of liquid waste 

Tank#390 30,000-gallon tank used for storage of No.2 Diesel Fuel 

Emergency Generator I #2 Fuel oil-fired (0.4 MMBrulhr, :S 112kW) 

Emergency Generator 2 #2 Fuel oil-fired (0.41--fMBtulhr, :S 112kW) 

57 

VES010024 
; ...... , 

. · .

• 

' 

/ 

calculated to be 0.8833 pounds VOM per hour and 3.87 tons YOM per year. The 

detailed calculations are provided below. 

Drums crushed per year • 350,400 (40 drums /hour, 8,760 hours/year 

VOM Emission Factor Calculation for Drum Crusher 

Emission Factor = Summation of Pounds YOM from Column I below 

= 0.0221 pounds per drum 

Maximum rate of crus!Ung = 40 drums per hour 

Maximum YOM emission rate = 0.0221 x 40 = 0.8833 pounds VOM per hour 

Maximum aMual VOM rare • 0.8833 x 179/2,000 c 0.0790 tons VOM per 

year 

Potential-To-Emit (PTE) 

Emissions - Volatile Organic Material (VOM) 

VOM Emission Factor Calculation for Drum Crusher 

Emission Factor = Summation of Pounds VOM from Column I 

• 0.0221 pounds per drum 

Maximum rate of crushing = 40 drums per hour 

Maximum YOM emission rate = 0.0221 x 40 = 0.8833 pounds VOM per hour 

Maximum annual YOM rate = 0.8833 x 8,760 /2,000 = 3.87 tons VOM per 

year 

PTE VOM emissions from drum crushing operations= 3.87 ton VOM/yr 

63 

VES010025 
.· ·: :· 

·····•·' 

10. Tanks 

All the tanks emit both VOM and benzene. The actual YOM emissions are those reported in 

the Annual Air Emissions Report for 2012. The YOM and benzene PTEs were calculated from 

tbe emission factor detennined using 2012 emission rates and throughputs. The emission factor 

was then multiplied times the maximum hourly throughput to yield the potential YOM 

emissions in pounds per hour; and then converted to tons per year using 8,760 hours per year. 

Tao k Emissions Summar.· 

Actual 2012 Emission 

Tank Emissions Factor PTE PTE 

Number Pollutant 2012 T hroughput (lbs/l fY (Lblbr} (Tonlyr} 

(lb/yr) (1 03 galsJyr} gals) 

VOM 1.58 0.0026 0.0052 0.0230 Tank ~2 602 Benzene 0.0015 2.49£-06 4.98!!-06 2. 8£~$ 

ank~ 

YOM 1.73 602 0.0029 0.0057 0.0252 

Benzene: I 0.017 2.82E-05 5.65~5 2.47E~4 

YOM 2.76 

3061 

0.0009 0.0018 0.0079 Tank~ 

Benzene 0.0027 8.321!-07 1.76E-1>6 7.73E~ 

Tank #S 

YOM 2.3! 

2461 

O.OOll 0.0023 0.0100 

Benzene 0.0027 l.IOE-06 2.19E-06 E~ 

YOM 10.68 0.0214 0.0427 0.1871 Tank #10 500 

Benzene 0.0104 2.08£.05 4.16£.05 1.82.E~4 

Tank#20 

VOM 1.12 

310 

0.0036 0.0072 0.0316 

Benzene 0.0011 3.55£.06 0E~ J.!IE-1>5 

YOM 2.33 0.0295 0.0590 0.2584 Tank NJO 79 Benzene 0.0023 2.91E-05 5.32E-05 2.55E-04 

Tank 1140 

VOM 2.42 657 0.0037 0.0074 0.0323 

Benzene 0.0023 J.SOE-06 7.00£.06 3.07E~5 

YOM 0.7650 0.0010 0.0020 0.0033 

Tank IISO 764 

Benzene 0.0007 9.46E·07 1.83£.06 8.03E~ 

YOM 5.55 0.0058 0.011 7 0.0512 

Tank 1160 950 Ben~e 0.0054 5.68£-06 l.l4E-05 4.98£..05 

YOM 1.90 

580 

0.0033 0.0066 0.0287 

Tank li300 

Benzene 0.0018 3.10E-06 6.ZIE-06 2.7 E~5 

YOM 11.74 0.0216 0.0432 0.1894 

Tank #302 543 

Benzene 0.0! 14 2.101!-05 4.20£.05 1.841!-04 

YOM 2.81 0.0065 0.0130 0.0567 

Tank#304 434 

Benzene 0.0027 6.22E-06 1.24~5 S.4SE-05 

YOM 5.28 0.011 3 0.0227 0.0993 

Tank #306 466 

Benume 0.0051 1.09E-05 2.19E-OS 9.59£.05 

VOM 8.99 0.0253 0.0506 0.22!8 

Tank #308 355 

Benzene 0.0087 2.45E-05 4.90E-05 2.. 5~4 

Tank #310 VOM 8.27 282 0.0293 0.0587 0.2569 

65 

VE$010026 
.--:-·-. 

· ... . Tank Emissions Summarv 

I Actual 2012 Emission ! 

Tank Emissions Factor j PTE PTE 

Number 

Pollutant 

1 

2012 T hroughput (lbs!l03 ! (Lblbr) (Too!yr) 

Ob/vr) (1 o' galslyr) ~als) ! 

; 

Benzme 0.0080 2.84E-05 ' 5.67E-05 2.48E-04 

Tank #312 

VOM 7.71 0.0402 0.0803 0.3517 

192 Benzene 0.0075 3.91E-05 7.81E-OS 3.421!-04 

Tank #314 

VOM 4.64 

192 

0.0242 0.0483 0.2117 

Benzene· 0.0045 2-34E-05 4.69E-OS 2.05E-04 

I L Emergency Generators 

An emergency generator that combusts #2 fuel oil is used for emergency power/energy 

requirements. The generator rating is less than II 2 kilowatts or I 50.2 horsepower. The 

maximum hourly design rate is approximately 0.4 MMBtu/hr. The generator is only used in 

the case of a power outage or nalUtal gas curtailment. Nonemergency operation is limited to 

maintenance and testing that is necessary to maintain the readiness of the unit. 

A second emergency generator is used oo operate the fire water pump in the event of an onsire 

fire. This generator also combusts #2 fuel oil and has a maximum bourly design rate of 

approximately 0.4 MM.Btulhr (< 112 kilowatt rating). 

When operated, the 112 fuel oil combustion generates emissions of PM, S~, NOx, CO, VOM 

and organic/inorganic HAPs. There are no emission control devices associated with these 

units. 

EmeT2eocv Generator Emissions Summary 

Ma.ximumHoorlv Heat lnout: 0.4 MMB!ttlhr (,:: 112 kW 150.2 Hol 

Maximum Hours of :looration """ vear. $00 br/\'r 

Emission 

Factor PTE PTE 

Pollutant (lblmmbto) Oblhr) (toosfvr) 

co 0.95 0.38 0.095 

VOM 0.35 0.14 0,035 

NOx 4.41 1.76 0.441 

PMz.5 0.31 0.124 0.03 1 

PM,o 0.31 0.124 0.031 

PM 0.31 0.124 0.031 

so, 0.29 0.1 16 0.029 

Aldehydes 0.07 0.028 0.007 

F ormaldehvde 0.00118 0.0005 0.0001 

66 

VES010027 
EMISSION 

UNIT (DIS\ DrumCru~ 

APPLICATION 

REFERENCE 

FOR ~!'LICABLE Rli'I>UJRMEm' 

Sectioi'IJV.J.4 

SectioniVJ.S 

J'Qi.itr. Requirem'eotsBol\.er Section IV.K..I 

Boik:r Section JV.K2 

Boiler Soe:tion rv .K.~ 

B.olloet SectioniV.K,4 

S.OUer tion N .X.S 

Boiler Section rv .K.6 

CITATION 

,CfR 7l.6(o)(lXi)(A) "'d 

40 CfR 7l.6(a)()) 

... .. 3S IAC2i6.12l 

40 CFR S~Alpart De 

lS lAC 1 12, 12J(a) 

Coo5U!Jttion p::rmi1 9508002S 

~OCFR 61 . .S2 

•o CF1\ 63 Sokpout ODODD 

B<lilu SecJ~n IV .lUI 40 CFl{ «,:~;(3) 

l:meueocv Generatori; _Re;;"uireme:nrs: ' · Emergo:ncy 

~ 

Sec.tKm lV.L.l 40 CFR 63 Su~ ZZZZ 

Emergency 

~ 

Section lV .L.2 <WCFR 63.6602 

Sec:cioniV.L.3 

GaSoline ~ora e. Tank: Reaulnments · · . ~ 

Gasoline Tank Section IV.MJ 351AC219.122 

-.- . 

'· ' 

COMPLIANCE METHOD 

NOx., COemi:ssion rate ca.lcu.1stions b6sc.d OJ'I monitottld eootennlioosdurins annuQJ. -~ andannua:l O!>CflltiliR: holm. 

Work pr-'l:tion for annool tur\c>oup. on~· lime energy e.>S(SSI"''lCnt, submi.ssioc of 

NOC. 

Wort J!Ca:.t;oc protcdures for IliA~ impection end idle opcntion will be 

followed. 

73 

VESOI0028 
Additional Recordkeepine 

Inspection As Required by 40 CPR 61 Subpart FF I Quarterly 

Inspection Certification I Quarterly 

Tank390 

Throughput Supplier invoices I Purchase frequency 

Emer~ency Generators 

Hours of opetalion and Install a non-resettable hour meter as During operation description of use required bv 40 CFR 63 Suboart ZZZZ 

Records of inspection of air cleaner, 

Inspection boses and belts as required by 40 CFR 

63 Suboarl ZZZZ 

Annually 

Startup, Shutdown Operating record and maintenance Per Occurrence and Malfunction time and records for oil and mter changes as annually duration reQuired bv 40 CFR 63 Su~l'an ZZZZ 

Veolia utilizes an extensive preventative maintenance (PM) program to keep equipment 

operational and prevent breakdowns and failures. This includes aspects such as documenting 

detailed maintenance histories on equipment, routine inspection, and lubrication programs for 

high-wear equipment and non-destructive testing of piping and vessels using techniques like 

ultrasound to assess integrity. The frequency of these activities varies depending upon the 

equipment, PM activity, and the incinerator's shutdown schedule. 

B. Reporting Req uirements 

Veolia reports information as required by the Hazardous Waste Combustor MACT standard, 

40 CFR 63~ Unit 2, 3, 4, Material Processing Area I and 2, Bulk Feed Building, Lab Pack 

Repack Area and all tanks that are used for the storage of liquid waste are also subject to 

requirements of 40 CPR 61 Subpart FF (Benzene NESHAP). In addition to lhe general 

reporting requirements summarized in the following tables, these units comply with all 

applicable reporting requirements as required by 40 CFR 61 Subpart FF. 

General Reporting Requirements 

Reference Reoort 

63 .1 0(d)(4) Compliance progress reports, if required as a condition of an 

extension oftbe compliance date granted under Sec. 63.6Cil~ 

63.10(d)(5)(i) Periodic startup, shutdown, and malfunction reports. 

63 I 0( d)(S)(ii) Immediate startup, shutdown, and malfunction rej)Orts~ 

63.10(e)(3) Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system 

I oerformance reoort and summarv reoort. 

63.1206( c )(2)(ii)(J3) Startuo. shutdown. and malfunction olan. 

63.1206(c)(3)(vi) Excessive exceedances reoorts. 

63. t206(c)(4)(iv) Eme111:ency safetY vent ooeninll: reoorts~ 

78 

VESOI0029 
' ... 

Reportinf{ Requirements 

Visual lnspeetioos and I Quarterly inspection certification as I Quarterly Monitorinp, Required by 40 CFR 61 Subpart FF 

Tan!< 390 

Emissions Inventory I Annual Emissions Report I ArulUal 

Eroergencv Genen tors 

Emlssion Inventory I Annual Emissions Report I Annual 

Veolia reports to the IEPA each occurrence of an A WFCO due to the combustion zone 

pressure being greater than allowable setpoints when evidence of visible emissions during the 

A WFCO exists. In addition, any failure to perform the work practice standards for the 

emergency generators will be reported. 

80 

VES010030 
OMS Control No 20$tl.()JJS 

U.S. ENVIRONt.IENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

APPUCATION FOR FEDERAl OPERATING PERMIT, 40 CFR PART 7! 

FORM PTE ·POTENTIAL TO EMIT SUMMARY ~ ...... : .. INSTIRUCTIONS: Complete thi! form onoe for the facility. You may WI. helpful to ecmptete fonn EMlSS for each emmions unit before 

cornplo:ing this form. f ot' e.ach omlulon.s unh with emissions that count tcwtards applicab4-my, fl!t the emissions uniliD and lhe 

PTE for the ai' pollutants fisted below. If there ere ether .Q pollutan!s not listed below forwdlich tne $ourte is a major source, 

provk:fe attachment$ n:M'I"'ing the air pollutant and showmg cafcut:tlon of the W I for that po!Mant Round values to tho neare:sl 

tenth of a ton. Add all va1ues together in each cobm and enter the total k\ the space provided at fhe bottom ot Ule table. Also 

r-rt theoelohlls il sectlon J of fonn GIS. 

Emloslon• Unit 10 R-lated Air PoHutants an4 Polluiant• lOt whlonthe Source 1$ Male< 

NOx 

~) S02 PM10 co Lead IW> ~ons/yr) (lonstyr) (tonstyr) Oonstyr) (IOn$!\'r) (tons/yr) 

UD.it 2 4.0 0.9 7.7 2.53 6.6 0.0202 4.166 

Unit 3 4.0 0.9 1.1 2.53 6.6 0.0202 4.166 

UD.it 4 6!.6 3.1 50.76 7.15 13.86 0.0564 11.78 

Lab Pack Repack 1.45 0.2418 

Material Processing 1 0.2387 0.0495 

.. Material Processing 2 ' 

0.2387 0.0495 

' 

Drum Crusher 3.87 0.9356 

Tank2 0.0230 2.18E..()5 

Tank4 0.0252 2.47E-04 

Tank6 0.0079 7.73E..Q6 

Tank 8 0.0100 9.61E..Q6 

Tank 10 0.1871 1.82E·OS 

Tank 20 0.0316 3.llll-05 

Tank 30 0.2584 2.5SE·04 

Tank40 0.0323 3.07E..()5 

I ., Tank 50 0.0088 8.03E-06 

' i 

z .. . · 

TOTALS TOTAL ON 2h"D FORM 

VES010031 
OMB COntrol No 2060-033& 

V.S, NV ON!~~ eNTAl PROTECTION AGENCY 

APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL OPERATING PERMIT, 40 CFR PART 71 

FORt• l"TE , POTIENTIAl TO EMIT SUUMARY 

INSTRUCTIOtiS: Comp!e\0 !tis form cnce for tbe f-acllly, You may l'lnd fl he"fil to COfll)lele iorm EM.ISS tor each oml$$ions unit before 

oompletj!'Q thi5 form. FOf eac:t! emissions unit with emiasions th~ oounl towards appkabiiity, tl$t the emiss-ions unit 10 and the 

PTE fiX the alt poli\Unts listed below. li thete ate other air polkitanfs not listed below for which the SO\.trc:e It a major SCXM"ca, 

provide attach !!Ients .am~ thG air poi!Ulant and showing calculation of the to1al for that pollutant RO(lnd values to the neares1 

tenth of a too. ACtJ all vafues tOo,}E!ther in each colurnn and ertief-the to1al in the space provi:Jed al the bottom of the table. Also 

n!port thue totals in section J of fom1 GIS. 

Emissions llnll iD R:tQulatlr:S Air PolkJtants ~nd Poll.ttants for whicb the Source ii l\llijOf 

~~ voc 502 PM10 co Lead K4P 

0001 (jooslyr) on•lyr) (1oos/ylj onolyr) (lon•f>'l) Oomlyr) 

Tank60 0.0512 4.98E-05 

Tank 300 0.0287 2.71E-05 

Tank 302 0.1894 l.S4E-04 

Tank304 0.0567 5.45E-05 

Tank 306 0.0993 9.59E-05 

: Tank308 0.2218 2.15E-04 

Tank 310 0.2569 2.48E-04 

Tank 312 0.3517 3.42E-04 

Tank 314 0.2117 2.05E-04 .. 

Bulk Solids Storage 2.56 0.0188 

Fugitive Equipment Leaks 0.0738 0.0001 

Boiler 1 4.51 0.24$ 0.027 0.343 3.79 0.00002 0.0037 

Emergency Generator #I 0.441 O.o35 0.029 0.031 0.095 0.0071 

Emergency Generator #2 0.441 0-035 0.029 0.03 1 0.095 0.0011 . 

.. TOTALS 74.99 15.63 66.25 12.62 30.85 0.0968 21.4 

VES010032 
OMS Con~ol No 2000-03)5 

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

AP?UCATION FOR FEDERAL O?ERATING PERMIT, 40 CFR PART 71 

FORM EMISS • EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS 

,4 .. ~ 

. 

~/ INSTRUCTIONS: Use thit form 1o caJa.Mte poientlil to em if (PTE) for applcibllty purposes and aci.tlal em!:ssiona for iee purpos.es for each .. emiuions unl, control device, or alternative operating scenario iddifiecl ln section 1 of tonn GIS. H form FEE does not need to 

be subm~ Wlh the appieati:>n., do not calcuhrto ad!Jal emiss-Ions. 

A. Emissions Untt 10 Unit 2 (1 of2) 

B. kll!!llnUfleatlon and Qua~n of Emissions 

Instructions: f"rrst, list each air pollutant that 1$ eilher l"'gu!ated at the uri. or present in frnljor amowrts. Second, lls.t any olher -s~utattd pollutarrt (for 

fee caiC!Aation) emitted a! the uni thai haY$ not ahady beM listed. Each HAP added to the 1st It this step may be slmpty HS18d as 

"HAP''", Ne'ICf, caleu'-1! PTE tO€ applicabiity purpoees end a dual emissions for fee purposes for e3C'It listed sir pollutanl Do ncn ak::ulate 

PTE fOt air polllblnts listed solaf}! for fee I)Uri)OSeS~ lnciude Ill fuglive$. inthJOmg those tl\at do not count towarcb 81)picabiity, when 

celculating ectual emissions. At a minm um, round lo the noarest tenth or a ton tor yeatty vaW or t.nth of a pound fot !'IOU'!y values. 

AUach examplE$ of calculations the! itiJstratas the methodology used. 

Air Po41u13nts (JRcludilg reguiaied aiJ polluWrta and Emission RsJes CAS No. 

pollutanl> fO< wtllcll me •""""' Is major) 

Act\lal Polenija toEin~ 

Annual 

Em_issions ~, = (lonslyr) 

PM/PM10/PM2.5 0.5775 2.53 

HCIJCL2 0.9340 4.09 

NOx NA 4.0 .·. -

co 2.31 6.6 

802 NA 7.7 

. YOM 8.0 0.90 

Hg 0.0026 0.00114 7439-97-6 

As 0.0018 0.0081 7440-38-2 

Be 0.0018 0.0081 7440-41-7 

Cd 0.0046 0.0202 7440-43-9 

Cr 0.0018 0.0081 7440-47-3 

Sb 0.0000342 0.000015 7440-31-5 

,. ·, . 

VES010033 
OMB Con.lrol No 2060-0336 

U.S. EI~V1RONMENTAI. PROTECTION AGENCY 

APPLICATION FOF< FEDEF<AI. OPERATING PERMIT. 40 CFR PART 71 

FORM EIIIISS • EMJSSIONS CALCULAnONS .. ~ 

... •. 

... 1NSTRUCTiONS: Ute th.is fonn to eaScula po\en1ial to emi {PTE) for applicabiity purposes a!ld actual emissions for fee purposes f~r each 

emiss~ns unit, control dsvice, Of sJtemative operating scenario id at~tifled in sed.Jon I of form GlS. I fatm FEE oes~ need to 

be submitted with the ~ptica1bt. do net calculate actual em!s:sions. 

A. Emissloos Uni'liD Unit 3 (1 of2) 

6. ldentific:ation and Quantification of Emissions 

Instructions: ~. is1 each air pollutant thai !$ either rC9J!ated at the lril or present in major amounts. Secood, list any o1har regolaied pollutant {for 

fee caJcuiation} emitled m the unit that h3w not 31ready been li~. each HAP added to the 1st in thi5 step may be simply bled 8$ 

"'HAP'', Nex1, calcW!te Pl'E for applicability pUfPQSes and actual emiSikm for tee purposes fw each tiled air po U~a L Oo not cabi!att 

PTE for air pollt.(an1s lis!ed soiety for fee ptXposct. lncbde aU fugiti\ICS, including those 1ha1 do not counl lowards appllcablty, when 

cak:ulating sctuat emiss.ions. At a mirlin.rn, round to the 11earest tsnth of a ton fOf yaarly valuu or tenth of a pound for hourty values. 

Attadl examples of cabilatlons tha1. illustrates the methodology used. 

Air Pofiutanb (IAcfuding regulatecl air pollutants and 

pol utanl$ for which the source is majo!1 

Emission Rams CAS No. 

Actual PotenllaiiO Emk 

Annus.1 

e;.:';:;' Hou~ Annua' .,n;~ Ctonslvrl 

PMIPM10/PM2.5 0.5775 2.53 

HCI/CL2 0.9340 4.09 

NOx NA 4.0 

co 2.31 6.6 

S02 NA 7.7 

VOM 8.0 0.90 

Hg 0.0026 0.00114 7439-97-6 

As 0.0018 0.0081 7440-38-2 

Be 0.0018 0.0081 7440-41-7 

Cd 0.0046 0.0202 7440-43-9 

Cr fo.0018 0.0081 744047-3 

Sb 0.0000342 0.000015 7440-31-5 

VES010034 
OMS Comrol No 2050.0336 

IJ.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGeNCY 

APPliCATION FOR FEDERAL OPEAAnNG PERMIT, 40 CfR PART 71 

FORM EM ISS • EIIIISSIONS CALCULA TIOHS 

< 

!.'· 

!NSTRIJC'IlONS; Use this tonn 1o celr:ulate potential to emit (PTE) for applie3bilif)' putposes and sauaJ emissions for tee purpose$ for each 

emissions un1t, eonttd cStvlce, or alematiw open~ llog setnarto ldet~UAtd J\ stdion J of form GIS .. tf loon FEE does not need to 

be submitted wllh the application. do not cabJlate aclua1 ernis.sions. 

A. Emlssloos Unit ID Unit4 (1 of2) 

8. ldentifi~oo ~ Quantification of Emissions 

lnstrudioos: First, list each air poluta.nt that ~either regulated at the unit or pte$enl In major amounts. Second, list arry ether f89Uiatied pol utant (tot 

fee eaJculation) emitted s.1 fhe unit 1haJ aven~ aP:edy been h ted.. Each HAP addDd to the !ist in this st~ rnay be c. imply lmed as. "HA?~. Next, calculate .PTE for appBcabilty purpOieS and adual emissloni for fee purpose$ or~ lii4ed air pollutant Do not calculate 

PTE fot air pollutants l!sWd soaety for fee purposes. lnducle al fuglflves. including those th&t do not oount k>wart!s appleabli!y, when 

cakulating actual emiss-lw. At a tninimum, round to th& nurMl tenth of a ton for yuarty values or tenth of a pountl for hourty values. 

Attach examples of cak:::u1atlons thai illustrates the methodology used. 

Air PoMants {induOing regulated air polutants and 

poiJvtants tor whk::h 11\e source is major) 

Emission Rates CAS No. 

A«ual Potential to EnWt 

AMuol 

Em'Ssions 

~:X = OJl$/y~ 

PM 1.63 7.15 

HC1/CL2 2.64 11.57 

' NOx NA 61.6 ' . 

co 6.52 13.86 

S02 NA 50.76 

VOM 8.0 3.1 

Hg 0.0073 0.0319 17439-97·6 

As 0.0052 0.0226 7440-38-2 

Be 0.0052 0.0226 7440-41-7 

Cd 0.0129 0.0564 744{)-43-9 

Cr 0.0052 0.0226 7440-47-3 

Sb 0.0000111 0.0000486 7440-31-5 

:-~ 

VES010035 
OMB Control No 205().0336 

U.S. Et-1\!IRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

APPLICATION FOR FEOERAL OPERATING PERMIT, 4D CFR PART 71 

FORM EMISS • EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS 

- INSTRUCTIONS: Us& lhil ftlnn to cak:u1aie potenlil! to emit (?TE) for iipplicabHII)' purposes and 81d:ual erni$s.Cns for f&e purposn for uct\ 

emts:sions oolt, control devk::e, or elt.emative operat~ scenallo Oentified in section I of form GIS. if form FEE d<>M not need to 

be l'Ubmttied 'lrith th& applica5on. do not eakulate at't\l3£ eml5-s:Sons. 

A. Em$slons Unft 10 Boiler #1 

B. ldentiflcsticn a.nd Qven1lflcation of Emissions 

instructions: First, llot each air po-.tant that is dhor rog\.Utod a\ tht unit or present in major amounts.. Seeond,lst any otho: regul:rted ~!ut:wrt (for 

fee caic:u!ation) emittad at the uni that have not alttsady been listed. E.ach KA.P added to the llst 1\ this slap may b! simp.,. listed as 

'"HAP". Next. calculate PTE for a;.picabily purposes 3nd actual emissions fof See purposes for each lmed sir polfutant Do not calcullne 

PTE for air po.,..,. Osf.ed sololy for roe pU!J>O.... Include ol fuglllveo, including those tha1 do no< count towatds appllcabllly, whon 

celculati1g actual emiasion&. Ate minimum, round to tho nearest tenth of a ton f01 ycar1y values oc tenth of a pound for hourly vaiucs. 

Attlctl e.x~mpfes of c:a.leullltions that ilh.1itra\e.S the meb:ldology used. 

Alr Pol utams (inelucfmg regPJlated air polk.t1anb and 

lut tJ for which the source is major) 

Emission Ram CAS No. 

Actual Potential to Emit 

Annual 

.. En'QsfoM 

(lons/y!) hM tnly t:~~ 

co 0.864 3.79 

VOM 0.057 0.248 

' N0x 1.03 4.51 

PM2.5 O.o78 0.343 

PM10 O.o78 0.343 

Part 0,078 0.343 

NH3 0.033 0.144 

SOx 0.006 0.027 

Lead 0.00001 0.00002 

HAP ~.()()1 0.0037 

VES010036 
OM! Conln:lf No 2060-0336 

U.S. NV RO~IA ENTAI. PROTECTION AGENCY 

APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL OPERATING PERMIT, 40 CfR PART 71 

FORM EMlSS - EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS 

.-·· 

INS1RUCTIONS: Use thit fonn to calculate potential io emi! (PTE) for app!lcability purposes and actual emission$ fOf fee purpose$ for eacn 

emiHions unt. control dcMcc, Of alternatlve operalil'lg scenario idenUfiecl in setlion I of form GIS. lr form FEE does not noed to 

be submitted with the appliartlon, do noc cablta\e actual emisskln.s. 

A Emi»lon;IJnK 10 Drum Crusher 

B. Identification ancS Ouillnt1fica1.ion of Emissions 

Instructions: First, list each air pollutant that ts tithOII' cegulated at tht un.tl or preaenf in tNjor amounts. Second. flit any OU\er regulated polkJt.mt (for 

fee cak:ul.ation) emitted 8'1 the unillh.ai have not already been 11sted. Each HAP adcled to the 11$1 \n this slap rn.ay be simp~)• llstacl as 

''HAP". Next, calculate PTE fOf spplicabi'l!y purposes and actual emissions for fcc purposes for each listed air ~lutarrt. Do not ealculale 

PTE fof ar pol!uta.nls listed solety for 1M purposes. lnclude all fugitives,lncluding those thaJ do not count towards applleablflty, ~ 

cakulsting &dual emisSions:. At a minimum. round to th& nearest t~With of 8 ton fOJ yeart,t vat~JU or tenth of a pound for hourly values. 

Atttch examples of calculations that ilustmes the· methodology u$$CI. 

Nr Pollutants (including regt.eat&d air pol!~ and Etnisston Ralt$ CAS No. pollutants for whk:h the source is majO!) 

Actual Patentia:t lo EtrUi 

Anll<lal 

Emissions 

= (tons/)!<) (~~ 

YOM 0.8833 3.87 

Benzene 0.000157 0.00006 71-43-2 

·. Methanol 0.0929 0.4069 67-56-l 

... ; · 

Organic Compounds 0.1207 0.5287 

~ : ... · 

VES010037 
VES010038.pdf 
April4, 2013 

Mr. George Czerniak, Director 

Air and Radiation Division 

(Fe<I-X'ed) 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Region5 

77 West Jackson Blvd. (R-19J) 

Chicago, IL 60604-3590 

RE: Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LL.C. 

Sauget, IL 

40 CFR Part 71 

Title V Permit Renewal Application 

Dear Mr. Czerniak, 

(i)veoli~ €NV!RON MENTAL SEI':VICES 

Enclosed for your review is Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.LC. Sauget. IL facility's 

. Title V permit renewal application prepared in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Part 71. This 

· is a renewal application to the 'r)tle V permH that was issues on September 12, 2006 

and expires on October12, 2013. 

If you have any questions on this submittal or would like to meet to discuss this 

applicatipn, please can Dennis· Warchol or me at (618) 271-2804. 

S~i rely, t/ . I tf~ Doug rris 

General Manager 

Alt. 

cc: EPA File 

117 Mobile Avenue, ~uget, tL 62201 

(618) 271·2804 

WMV.veollaes.com 

VES010038 
APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF A 

MAJOR SOURCE OPERATING PERMIT 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

#7 Mobile A venue 

Sauget, Dlinois 62201 

APRIL2013 

VES010039 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. 2 

I. IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION ......................................... ., .......................................... 3 

A. .Facility Information ........................................................................................................... 3 

B. ~ource Description., ......................................................................................................... 3 

II. EMISSIONS INFORMATION .......................................... : ................................................ 5 

A. Hazardous Waste Combustors ......................................................................................... 5 

B. Material Processing Areas ................................................................................................ 5 

C. DI111D Crusher ................................................................................................................... 6 

D. Storage Tank Units ............................................. : ............................................................. 6 

E. Bulk Feed Bwldiog .......................................................................................................... 6 

F. Gasoline Storage Tank .................................................................. , ...................................... 7 

G. Boiler #! ......................................................................................... , .................................. 7 

H. FUgitive Organic Emissions ............................................................................................. 7 

I. Emergency Generators ......................................................................................................... 7 

J. Insignificant Emission Units ................................................................................................ 7 

K. Actual Emission Rates .............. , ....... ., ............................................................................. 8 

III. APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................... 9 

A. 40 CPR 63 Subpart DDDDD National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process 

Heaters ........................................................................................ : ..................................... 9 

B. Removal of Obsolete Requirements Related to Compliance Dates in 40 CFR 63 Subpart 

EEE National. Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Hazardous Waste 

Combustors ..................................................................................................................... 10 

c: Adjustment of Basis for VOM Emission Calculations for Drum Crusher ..................... I 0 

D. Transfer of Combustors' Operating Permit Limits from Main Body ofPermit to 

Appendix that Contains Most Recent Notification of Compliance Summary Table ..... 11 

E. 40 CPR 63 Subpart ZZZZ National Emissiou Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

fur Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines .......................................... II 

F. 35 lAC 219.585 Gasoline Volatility Standards .............................................................. 12 

N. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE ........................................................................ 15 

V. COMPLIANCE STATUS AND CERTIFICATION ......................................................... 16 

VI. STANDARD APPLICATION FORMS ............................................................................ 17 

APPENDIX A: El'vOSSION CALCULATIONS ......................................................................... 18 

APPENDlX B: CURRENT NOTIFICATION OF CO!vlPLIANCE (NOC) OPL SUMMARY. 21 

2 

VESOI0040 
J. IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION 

Veolia ES Tecbnical Solutions (Veolia) owns and operates a Resource Conservation and 

Recovery Act (RCRA) treatment, storage and disposal facility in Sauget, Illinois. The primary 

facility activities include receipt of bulk waste or waste in eonbiiners, waste processing, waste 

storage, and waste incineration in one of three combustion units. The facility operates in 

accordance with a Title V pennit to operate, Permit No. V-Ilrl2716300103-08-0l issued in 

accordance with 40 CPR Part 71 by USEPA Region 5 and the most recent Notification of 

Compliance (NOC) that contains operating limits for the combu.stors. In addition, Veolia 

operates in accordance with a hazardous waste Part B permit for trestment, storage, and disposal 

ofbazardous waste, 

A. Facility Information 

. Facility Nam·e: 

Plant ID: 

Address: 

Geo~:raphical: 

Permit Contact: 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions (Veolia) 

1716300103 

#7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, lL 62201-1069 . 

St Clair County 

Latitude 38.59447 

Longitude -90.1854 

Douglas Harris, General Manager 

Please refer to Form GIS of the standard application forms fur additional specific facility 

information. The foms are contained in Section VI oftlns document. 

B. Sour<:& Description 

The Veolia facility is comprised of emission units that have been grouped into twelve 

defined source emission points. There have been no physical changes to the existing 

emission units as desc:ribed in the original Title V pellllit application. No emission units 

have been added since the original Title V permit became effective (October 12, 2008). 

The grouped sources, therefore, are provided below as they are listed in Pcnnit #V -IL1716300103-08-01, Section (1.0)(B). 

Emission Description Manufacturt-r Date or EmJss.ioD Control 

Uwt /Model Construction EouJoment 

!ncincratioo Unit #2 Trado Waste 9/1986 Joy·N'Il'o Spray Drye.r (16 mmBtulbr) Incineration Absorber (SDA-2), 

Hazardous TWI-2000, Pulse f lo fabric Filter 

Waste Series 2 BH-2l 

Combustors lncineratiorr Unit In Trade \Vasto 9/19&6 Ioy·Niro Sp<>y Dryer 

(16 nunBtulbr) Iocineration Absorber (SDA·3), 

TWI-2000, I ~·1~ o Fabric Filler Series '2 BH-3 

3 

VES010041 
EJU.ission Description 1\lanufacturu Date of Emiss.ioD Conlrol 

UnJr /Modtl Constt.udon Eauiom<nl 

Incineration Unit 1M International 611988 Tempering Chamber, 

(SO mmBruihr) Waste En"'l!Y· Acti.\'ate.d Carbon Injection. 

PY•ROX Spray Dryer Absorber 

(SDA-4), . 

Fabric Filtc<iBH-4) 

Material Processing 1988 Noce 

Material Areas #I and #2 

Processing (MP·I and MP-2) 

Aseas T..ab Pack Repack 1988 None 

Area 

Drum Crusher Crushhlg of RCRA- 1984 None 

emotv containers 

Storage Tonks TliDb: 1#2, #4. #6. Modem Welding 1988 Activatc;d Carbon 

for Liquid #8, #10, 11'20, #.30, 2&4 r<J>Iaood Adsorbell! oo each 

Wastea #40, #50, 1160, #300, ~ kind 412002 

#J02, #304, #306, l 0&20 replaced 

#308, #310, 113 12, in-kind 612004 

#3l4 30 tepiB('Cd inldnd l/2009 

Stor8ge Tank Tanks#390 Modem Welding 1988 None 

for#2 Fuol 

Oil 

Bulk feed Temporary storage 1988 C)'clone, Ainol .Baghouse 

Builcling of l>ull: solid Waste$ (13F 13tds-BH·I), Activated 

(13F Bldg) in pits prioc to being Carbon AdOOJption Uoit 

fed tc;> Incinecaticn (BF Bldg.C.A) 

Unit#4 

Gasolioe SSO-gol!on unk wit~ 1992 replaced Nono 

Storage Taol: submerged loading 

I oioc 

in·ldnd 612012 

Diesel Fuel 550-galloD tank 1992 rep!OC<d None 

T8DI: in t;nd 6120 I 2 

Oosilmifi<anll 

Kerosene 551J.gaUon taDI: 1992 replaced None 

Tonk in ldnd 6120 I 2 

(!n<loniflcant) 

B<>ilcr #I Natural gas-fired Cleaver Brooks, 1111995 None 

Boiler(l0.6 2SO 

mmBtulhrl 

EmcrJP"ll'y ~g Fuel oil-fired •.) 1988 None 

Geo:ea::ators ·2. 0.4 MMBIU/hr ca. 

Fugitive Pumps, Valves, N/A NOJlll 

Emissions Flanacs. Opcoended LiDes, 

(;QruprtSSOIS 

Descriptions of emission units and control equipment are p.rovided ·on the standard 

applicatioo forms EUD-1 and EUD-2 found in Section VI of this document. 

4 

VESOJ 0042 
ll. EMISSIONS INFORMATION 

TI1e emis:;ion sources at the Veolia facility have the potential to emit particulate matter (PM), 

volatile otganic materials (VOM), sulfur dioxide (S02), nitrogen oxides (NOx}, carbon 

monoxide (CO), and organic/inorganic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). 'Emissions are 

generated from the storage and handling of waste in material processing areas, breall!ing and 

worldng losses from storage tanks, combustion of waste, combustion of natural gas and organic 

liquid transfer in piping. The process flow, emission unit descriptions and em.ission control 

information has not changed from that pro'llided in the original Title V penni! application. The 

following sections provide brief summaries of the pertinent process and emission rate 

information. 

A. Hazardous Waste Combustors 

Incineration units 112 and #3 ate identical fixed-hearth incinerators with a two-stage 

combustion process and maximum heat input capacity of 16 MMBtulhr each. Ignition of 

waste material takes place in the primary Oower) combustion chamber at temperatures in 

excess of I ,700 degrees F. A secondary (upper) combustion chamber serves as an "afterburner" for process gases. The secondary combustion chamber temperature is maintained 

at a. minimum temperature of f,800 degrees F. Natural gas is used as a11xiliary fuel in 

both chambers to maintain minimwn comb11Stion chamber temperatures. Each unit is 

equipped with a spray dryer adsorber and fabric filter air pollution control system. The 

fabric filter for unit #2 has four baghouse chambers ·while the fabric filter for unit #3 has 

three bagbouse chambers. 

Incineration unit #4 is a rotary kiln equipped with a socondary·combustion chamber ao4 a 

maximum heat input capacity of 50 MMBtu/hr. Ignition of waste material takes place in 

the primacy kiln at temperatures in excess of 1,500 degrees F. The secondary combostion 

chamber temperature is maintained above 1,880. degrees F. Natural gas is used as 

auxiliary fuel to maintain minimum combustion temperatures. This unit is equipped with 

au air pollution control system that consists of a tempering chamber, a eli vated carbon 

~jectiou, a spray dryer adsorber, and a fabric filter. 

The incin~ration units generate emissions of PM, SOz, NOx, CO, VOM and 

organic/iilorganic HAPs. 

B. Material Processing Areas 

Material processing involves repackaging of containerized solid wastes into smaller, 

more manageable con ain~ for incineration. Some solid wastes may be received 

containing free liquids that may be ijqueous or organic. During material processing, free 

liquids are ftxed with an inert absorbent to facilitate repackaging. Material processing 

occurs at MP-1, MP-2, and the Lab Pack Repack Facility in Building 2B. These 

operations emit fugitive emissions in an enclosed building. VOMs and organic HAPs are 

emitted to the atmosphere through building/area exhaust fans. 

5 

VES010043 
C. Drum Crusher 

Drums ~eceived that are unsuitable fox reuse are crushed at the Drum Crusher after being 

emptied. These empty drums may contain residual organic material. Crushed drums are 

transported off-site for disposal. Fugitive emissions of VOM and organic HAP are 

emitted. to the atmosphere. 

D. Storage Tank Units 

Bulk liquid wastes are stored at Tank Farm #1 and Tank Fann #3. All bulk liquid waste 

tanks are vertical, fixed-roof tanks equipped with carbon canisters for control of 

emissioi)S. In addition, No. 2 fuel oil, kerosene, and gasoline are also stored onsite in 

tanks. Emissions from the liquid bulk storage and handling units are VOMs and organic 

HAPs. Storage tank emi5Sidn units ;md their capacities are listed below. 

t#l 

t#l 

o#l 

. .., " t#l 

'#I 

n I~ 

1: 

'#3 

~ o#3 

o#3 3• 

farm 3· 10 

: Fann } 10 

30.000 

I• 0.000 

~ 0.000 

T.:,a:;;~ lOO 

:Fuel Otl <>uth. 

<>uth . 

. Fuel Oil 'ire I 

E. Bnlk Feed Building 

Bulk solid wastes are stored in four pits in tho Bulk Feed Building. Solids stored in these 

pits are incinerated in Unit 4. Bulk solid wastes are moved from the pits to .Unit 4 by a 

clamshell .through au enclosed gallery. The activities within the building generate 

emissions of PM, VOM and organic/inorganic HAPs. The building exhaust is equipped 

with an air pollution control system thai consists of a cyclone, two bagbouses, and a 

carbon adsorption system. 

6 

VES010044 
F. GasoUne Storage Tank 

Gasoline is stored in a 550-gallon horizontal tank for utilization by \X)mpany vehicles. 

The tank is equipped with a submerged loading pipe. VOM ·emissions are generated 

from the tank. 

G. Boller #l 

There is 10.6 MMBtulbr natural gas boiler located north of Tank Fann #1. TI>e boiler is 

used to generate heat and steam fur on-site uses. The natural g~s combustion-in the boiler 

generates emissions of PM, 802, NOx, CO, YOM and organic/inorganic HAPs. There is 

no emission control devices associated with this unit. 

H. Fugitive Organic Emissions· 

Fugitive YOM and organic HAP emissions are generated by leaking equipment like 

valves, flanges, and pumps. Equipment components are inspected and monitored to 

minimize fugitive emissions from these sources. 

I. Emergency Q nerators 

An emergency generator that combusts #2 fuel oil is used for emergency power/energy 

requirements. The generator rating is less than I 12 kilowatts or 15(}.2 horsepower. Tho 

maximum hourly design rate is approximately 0.4 MMBtulbr. The generator is only used 

in the case of a power outage or nataral gas curtailment. Nonemergency operation is 

limited to maintenance and testing that is necessary to maintain the readiness of the unit. 

A second emergency generator is used to operate-the fire water pump in the event of an 

onsite fire. This generator also combusts #2 fuel oil and has a maximum hourly· design 

rate of approximately 0.4 .MMBtu'hr ( < 112 kilowatt rating). 

When operated, the #2 fuel oil combustion generates emissions of PM, SO,., NOx, CO, 

VOM and otganiclinorganic HAPs. There are. no eJllission control devices associated 

with these units. 

J. Insignificant Emission Units 

The list of insignificant emission units contained in the original Title Y'permit no. Y-IL1716300103-08-01 is provided below. No insignificant emission units have been added 

since the original Title Y permit became effective (October 12, 2008). 

2 .5 mmBtulhr Tioga portable boiler 

Ash handling 

Handling of spent dry scrubber solids 

Lime unloading and proportioning 

Gasoline storage tank 

Kerosene storage tank 

7 

VES010045 
Diesel fuel storage tank 

Use of absorbent material 

General vehi~le mainteuance and servicing (asswned to include diesel fuel handling) 

Laboratory · 

Piping and storage system for natural gas 

Non-halogenated cold cleaning degreasers 

Internal combustion engines of motor vehicles 

Storage and handling of closed dnllllS 

K. Actual Emission Rates 

Annual Emissions (tons) 

PoUutant 2007 2008 2009 2010 

co 1.93 1.95 1.67 1.41 

NOx 54.77 54.76 55.23 57.10 

PM 1.04 1.04 1.07 1.10 

so. 0.59& 0.496 0.520 0.490 

VOM 1.60 1.70 1.74 1.62 

HCI 2.69 3.56 2.09 2 .. 03 

2011 

1.21 

S8.16 

1.12 

0.49 

1.51 

1.&9 

8 

VES010046 
ill. APPUCABLE REQUIREMENTS 

The existing Title V pemit no. V-IL-1716300103-08-01 details the requirements that are 

appl.tcab1e to Veolia. However, Veolia requests several changes to permit requiremeniS based 

upon new regulations coming into effect, obsolete requirements that have been superseded and 

the collection of information during the permit term that affects the basis in the original 

application. The requested changes are descn'bed below. 

A. 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

PoUutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers 

and Process Heaters. 

The facility operates a natural gas-fired boiler (Boiler #1) with a maximwn heat input rate· 

of lo.6 MMBtulhour. On January 13, 2013, USEPA published the final standards for 

HAPs from lhe combustion of fuel in boilers and P.rocess beaters. Since the (acility is a 

major source ofliAPs, lhe requirements of 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD (Boiler MACT) 

apply to Boiler #I. Vcolia must provide initial notification in accordance with 40 CFR 

63.9(b)(2) by May 31,2013. The boiler must be itt compliance by January 31,2016. 

There are no ~licable numerical emissions litnits, ope(llling litnits or perfonnance 

testing requirements in the major source Boiler MACT for uruts designed to bum nantral 

gas (Gas 1). As descn'bed in Table 3 to Subpart DDDDD, Boiler #I must meet the work 

practice standards listed below. 

• Performance of an animal tune-up addressing all regulated emissions. The tune-up 

shall include the following as described in 40 CPR 63.7540(10): 

I. Inspection of the burner, the :flam~ pattern and the arr-to-titel ratio controls for 

operation in accordauce:,vitb manufacturer's specifications and perfonuance 

of adjustinents as nec.essary. 

2. Optimization oftotal CO emissions in coordination with NOx limitations. 

3. Measurement of CO concentrations and oxygen concentration in the boiler 

exhaust. 

4. Production of a written report doc~menting CO concentrations, corrective 

actions and the amount of fuel combusted during the year. 

• Performance of a one-time energy assessment by a qualified energy assessor. 

• Submission of a Notification of Compliance Status within 60 days of the initial tuneup. The applicable infomation listed in 40 CFR 63.7545(e)(l) through (8) must be 

provided in the Notification of Compliance Status. 

• Submission of an Annual Compliance Report as described in 40 CPR 63.7550 by 

January 3 I'' of each year. 

The existing Permit #V-IL-1716300103-08-01 in Section 2.7 Unit-Specific Operating 

Requirement for Boilers requires that Boiler #I CO concentrations not exceed I 00 ppm 

on a dry basis corrected to 3% oxygen. In addition, the facility is required to conduct 

annual perfonnance testing for Co and monitor monthly natural gas consumption. The 

9 

VES010047 
results :f\'om the last four years of perfonnance testing of the boiler for CO concentrations 

are provided in the table below. 

Date ofTest Hil!best CO Concentration (pplll] 

June 25, 2009 0.06 

Junel7 2010 <0.01 

J1me 9, 2011. <0.01 

June 8,2012 0.13 

The CO concentration of the boiler exhaust is very small and much less than the limit of 

I 00 ppm. The design of the Cleaver Brooks boiler is conducive to minimizing CO 

emissions by achieving good combustion. Veolia requests that the requirement to 

conduct a performance test for CO in Section 2.7(DX2) be ret;lloved and replaced with the 

reqnment to co.nduct an annual tune-up of the boiler as contained in the Boiler MACT 

discussed above. The annual tune-up will include measurement and optimization of the 

CO concentration in the boiler exhaust which achieves the same result as the·perforrnance 

test- demonstrating compliance with !he CO emission limitations of the permit. 

B. Removal of Obsolete Requirements Related to Compliance Dates in 40 CFR 63 

Subpart EEE National Emission Standar ds for Hazardous Air Pollutants From 

Hazardous Waste ComblL•tors. · 

Veolia requests that permit conditions in wlrich the compliance date has passed be 

removed frOm th.e Part 71 permit. Prior to October 14, 2008, the combustors were 

required to comply with different emission limitations than those that became applicable 

ailei: that date and continue to be applicabll'. The facility demonstrated comJ)liance with 

these limitations ai the time; bow ever, they are not relevant to facility requirements in the 

Part 71 permit going forward. 

C. Adjustment of Basis for VOM Emission Calculations for Drum Crusher. 

The Part 71 permit contains recordkeeping requirements for the drum crusher VOM 

emissions that musi be calculated using the emission factor of 0.0914 lb VOM!drum 

crushed. This emission factor was calculated based on {4e conservative asswnption that 

only methanol residue is in the containers to be crushed and that methanol is the only 

VOM released as the containers are crushed. This was conservative because methanol 

has a lrigher vapor pressure tllan most of the volatiles found in container residues, 

therefore, assuming the emissions were all methanol maximized the potential VOM 

emission rate. It was understood that this assun1plion significantly overestimated the 

VOM emissions from the drum crusher; bowever, the absence of data for the drum 

crusher operation required a conservative approach. 

Veolia has collected data for the five years since the pennit was issued including: the 

nurnber of containers crushed, the type of volatile constituents likely to be in container 

residue and th.e amount of these volatile consti.tuents processed on an annual basis. A 

1 CO concentration in~;~pm al3%oxygen. 

10 

VES010048 
new YOM eurission factor was calculated utilizing this data from actual operations. The 

container residue was characterized as containing the top. organics at their overall 

concentrations in the waste received in 2007 - 20 II. The remainder of the waste was 

represented as water and inert solids. This approach yielded a YOM emission factor of 

0.022 I pounds YOM per drum crushed. With a maximum CTUshing rate of 40 drums per 

hour, the potential to emit for the drum crusher was calculated to be 0.8833 pounds YOM 

per hour and 3.87 tons YOM per year. The detailed calculations are provided in 

Appendix A. 

D. Transfer of Combttstors' Operating Perruit Limits from Mab;t Body of Permit to 

Appendix that Contains Most Recent Notification of Compliance Summal'Y Table. 

The existing Permit #Y-IIA716300103-08-0l in Section 2.\(C) Hazardous Waste 

Combustors, Units 2, 3 and 4 contains work practice staJ>dards and <>perational 

requirements. Condition 2 of this Section lists the operating parameter limitE (OPLs) for 

the combustors .that arc used to demonstrate compliance with 40 CFR 63 Subpart EEE. 

Yeolia requests that the table containing the specific OPL limits be removed from 

Condition 2. Instead, we propose that Condition 2 read as follows. 

"2. Tire PemziUee must operate Units 2, 3, and 4 qmfer the operating parameter 

limits (OPLs) listed in the. Current NOC a summary of which Is provided in 

Atwchment A to this pennit document. Operation in accordance witlt the NOC limits 

is liStd to demonstrate compliance with Subpart EEE. " . 

The table suinmariziog the OPLs from the current NOC would be moved to an 

attachment at the back of the pem1it. This eliminates the need to change tables within 

permit conditions and allows the NOC information to be updated easily, · 

E. 40 CFR 63 Subpart 'Z:LZZ National Emission Standards for HazardottS Air 

PoUutants for Stationary Reciprocating lnternal Combustion Engines. 

1\vo emergency generators are located at the facility. They are stationacy reciprocating 

internal combustion engines. (R1CE) with a site rating of less than 50Q brake HP used 

only for emergency purposes that operate at a major source of HAP emissions. The 

emergency RICE must comply with the requirements of 40 CFR 63.6640(1) in order to be 

considered emergency stationary RICE. These requirements are listed below. 

(1) Por owner.~ and opentors of em('lgtncy engines, any opernaion ~ dr.m eroergoocy operatiM. maintenance and 

tes.Una:, ao4 opc::ration in nooc:tm:rgc:nl.!y sitlt!ltions f« SO hourx per year, as permitted in thjs .!leCIIon, is prohibited. 

(2) There i$ oo time limit on the usc of etnE!JleriC::Y Sl:_a(iOJ\8()' RICE in emergency situatioa.s. 

(3) You may open\te your ernergettey ~<'rioll3.1')' RrCE for the purpose of maintenance chocks and ~.adiness testing, 

provi4ed thlllt tbe tesls u:e rCQOmmended b)• P*raJ, State or 1 go\<emmcnt, the manufacturer, tbe \'endor, or the 

suranc~ company aS$0C:iattd Ylith the engine. Maihkna.nce checks w1d readiness te$ting of such units is limited to I 00 

hours per year. The: 01mcr or opeca.IOf may petition the Administrator for aptWOV3l of additional houn to be used for 

rnainfenaoce Meets and readiness ustin.;. bot n petition is' not required if tho 0\YDCr ot operotor maintains reeords 

indicating that Fodera!, State, or foe&~ standards require maintenance aod testing of emergct'lt:)' RI€E beyond 100 hourS 

ryt3r. 

11 

VES010049 
(4) You may operate :fOOl' emergency statiooory RJCE up 10 SO boon; pee y~r in nOOo(nlergtocy siruations.. bui ~ 

50 hours are coon led towards the I 00 hours pc:t year provided for nutintenanoe end terting, The 50 hour& per yeer for 

ucc .. emergcncy situations canoof be. used tOr peak shaviog or to genera!¢ income for o. facility to supply pow-er to an 

electric grid or Olbemise-supply -power lll pan of a financial arrangement with anotb« entity: except that o""l)tf'S aod 

opcmr.ors may opemte the emergency mgine fQr a maxlmuro of 15 bouN pc:r Y':8J' as part of a demand response 

pro~m if lh$ reaione.l transmj$Sion organization or eqaivalent balancing M~thority and b-ansroission operator has 

detennioed th~ are e·mqency eottdit1ons that could lead to a potential eJ ~ricat bl~ut, sUch as unusually low 

fr~C)', equipment overload, cq,oacity or energy ddlcicncy, or waoceptabJe-voltage- Jevtl. 1be c,t~gi.oe may ri.cx I» 

operattd for more than 30 minutes priot to the time when the emag.cncy condilioo is txpccted to occur. ltld the engine· 

operation must be terminated im.modi.a.tety aftc:r lhe facility is notified that the en~ency coodition is no longc:r 

immincot The 15 hours pee year of deman.d response operatioa are counted as p3rt of the SO boors of opct<lHOU per 

year provided for noneron-smcy situations. ·The S~Jpply of emer,seocy (tOW« to another entity or entities pursUant to 

financial ll'fT>~eot S~ fH.)f. limited by lllis FAif8ph (1)(4), as long as tl)c powct provided by the financial 

arrangeroent is limited to tmerga~ey power. 

Each emergency RJCE must comply with the following requirements by May 3, 2013 and 

at all times thereafter. 

I. Puring normal peration~ 

a. Chanse oiJ aod filtct every SOO hours. of opet1ilioo or ofurclaUy, whimtver comes first; 

b. lnspeclllit cte<me:r evety 1,000 hour:s ofOp~;:taticm or annually, wbiche,u- cernes fust; 

e. Jn.tpect aU boses and bdts evcty SOO hours of opcrntion or annuaUy, wbfchevt:r <:omes fim, and replace a.s necessary. 

d During startup: miniinizc the engine'S'fime .speut at. tdle and minimize the mgice's stl~ time 3t startup to a period 

needed for awopriate and s.afe loading: of tbe Engine, not to excoed 30 .minut~ afttt which time the nm..s:ta.nup 

emi.ssion timitations a-pply. 

2. Operate and ~mintaio the stationary 'RICE and afcel'otmtment control devioe (if any) aOC'O'tding to tbe manufacturer's 

em'issk:n..,.elated wrlt1eo lllSttue6ons or dtvdop and follow your own m.1inteoanoc pJM· whk:b must provl<k to tbe 

ex!et~t prtctic:able for the ai l~ and operation of the engine in a manner c:onsi$U!ot with good ~lr poUultoo 

coatrol practice for minimjzing emission.s. 

3. lnsta.il s no.n-resertablehoormttc:r if one i ii not already installed. 

4. Mllintain tbe followina: records:: 

• Deslcription of efd\ mtit\tnction of operttionfrnoojroriug cqll.ipil)O)tt; 

Descripdon Of all mail'llenanoe pedooned; 

• De$Crip(ioo of ac:ttona takco durin,a: malfuoction to n"im ~ emissioru; 

Dc:scriprion of oorrettive acrioos;· 

• Ust ofmaintmomce ~ducted to demonstrate that RICE was operated and miintalned in ·acoorCancc wilh tbe 

ntenaoce pl:mfm.anuftlcrurers rccommcndariono; 

• The boors of openrtion as moni-tond by the non-rcsettable bout< meter; and 

• Description of putpQse o-f opcnrtion boun spent 

S. Sources n:nast report .any failure to perform tbe wC'Ik pracrices ou the reqvired .schedule. 

F.. 35 lAC 219.585 Gasoline Volatility Standards. 

Effective January 28, 2013, the requirements of Illinois regulation 351AC 219.585 were 

repealed. Veolia requests thai Sedion 2.6 Unit-Specific Operating Requirements for 

Gasoline Storage Tanks be revised to remove the items related to the repealed 11lle. 

These items are listed below. · 

12 

VES010050 
Condition 2.6(A)(3) 

The . Penni tree shall not sell, offer for sale, dispense, Sll]Jply, offer for supply, or transport 

for use in Jllinois gasoline whose Reid vapor pressure exceedr the applicable limitations 

set forth in 35 MC 219.585 (b) and (c) below du1ing the regulatory control periods, 

which shall be June 1 to Sepl~mber 15. [35 lAC 219.585(a)j. 

Condition 2.6(A)(4l 

The Reid vapor pressure of gasoline, a measure of Its volatility, sha/11101 exceed 7.2 psl 

(49.68 kPa) during the regulatory control period In 1995 and each year thereafter. [35 

lAC 219.585(b)]. 

Condjtion 2.6CA)(Sl 

The Reid vapor prt!$sure of ethanol blend gasolines having at least nine percent (9%) but 

not more than ten percent (10%) ethyl alcohol by volume of the blended mix/tire, shall 

not exceed the limitations for gasoline set forth in subsection (b) of35 JAG 219.585 

by mare than 1.0 pounds per square Inch (psi)(6.9 kilopascalsj. 35 lAC 219.585(c)}. 

Condition 2.6(C)()) 

Tbe Permittee shall have gasoline stored in the ajfecJed rank sampled and analyzed for 

Reid vapor ptessute. Samples shall be conducl<!d at least once per calendar year or 

within 15 days of a written request from EPA. [40 CF.R. § 71.6(a)(3)(i)(B)]. 

Condition 2.6{C)(2) 

The Permirtee shall conduct all sampling {testing) ~f gasoline required by 3j lAC 

219.585 in accordance with the procedures contained in 40 C.F.R. part 80, appendix D, 

"Sampling Procedures for Fuel Volatility." 

Condition 2.6(Cl(3) 

The Permittee shall measure Reid vapor pressure of gasoline in accordance with the 

procedures contained in "Tests for Detennining Reiti Vapor Pressure (RVP) of Gasoline 

and Gasoline-~genate Blends," os set forth in 40 C.F.R. part 80, appendix E. 

Condition 2.6(C)(4l 

The Permittee shall determine the ethanol collfent of ethanol blend gasolines using one of 

the approved testing methodologies specified in 40 C.F.R.p<m80, appendix F. 

Condition 2.6fC){S) 

Any alternate to the sampling or testing methods or procedures comained in 35 lAC 

219.585 (d), (e), and(/) must be approved by the /EPA, which shafl consider data 

comparing the performance of the proposed a/fernatlve to the pe•formance of one or 

more approved test methods or procedw·es. Such di!UI shall accompany any request for 

!EPA approval of any alternate test procedure. If the /EPA detenm'nes that such data 

demonstrates that the proposed alternative will achieve result.s equivalent to the 

approved test methods or will achieve results equivalent to the approved test methods or 

procedures, JEPA shaft approve the proposed alternative. 

13 

VESOJOOSI 
Condition 2.6(C){§) 

On an annual basis. the Permittee slrall cond11ct an inspection of the gasoline storage 

tank 10 review its physical condition and ability to comply wiJh :15 lAC 219.585. {40 

C.FR § 71.6(a)(i)(3)(B}]. 

Condjtion 2.6<D)(3l 

The Permittee shall maintain records for each shipment of material loaded into the 

gasoline storage .tank that include copies of the .invoice. bill of lading or other 

d()Cumentationfrom the supplier that provides the type of material, the amount of 

shipment, date of delivery, and the Reid vapor pressttre {psi) of the gasoline. The 

Pe;milteesltall keep these records for three years. {40 C.F.R. § 7 J.6(a)(3)(i)(B)]. 

Condition 2.6(]))(4) 

The Permittee must maintain records of results ofany testing srrmples. {40 C.F.R. § 

71. 6(a)(3 )(i)(B)]: 

14 

VES010052 
IV. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE 

Compliance demonstration metbods, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting for the sources 

operating at Veolia are as required in PeJmit #V·lL-17163001 03-08-01. All Annual Cornpliance 

Certification is submitted each year for all applicable requirements as tbcy arc described in the 

l'art 71 permit. 

15 

VES010053 
V. COMPLIANCE STATUS AND CERTIFICATION 

Veolia is in compliance with the penni! and regulatory requirements as they apply to the 

emissions sources operating at the facility. The statement of completeness· and certification of 

compliance by the facility's responsible official is provided on the CTAC Form 5900·2 in 

Section VI of this document 

16 

VES010054 
VI. STANDARD APPLICATION FORMS 

This section contains. tlte completed applicable standar.d petnut application forms as published by 

the United States Environmental Protection Agency. 

17 

VES010055 
ft EPA- United StatilS 

:Mr.: - · . Environmental Prote~lon V · Agency OMB No. 2061Hl336. Aooroval xo~es 06/3012015 

Federal Operating Permit Program (40 CFR Part 71) 

GENERAL INFORMATION AND SUMMARY (GIS) 

A. Mallin Address and Contact lnfonnatlon 

Facility name Voo!la ES Ipnjca! Solut!ons 

Mailing address: Street or P.O. Box #tt.lwMWlllob"'lll!l.e.cA~veao.ll!ul!l.e _________ _ 

City Sauoet State _Jk_ ZIP 62201 • 1069 

Contact person: Douglas Harris TIUe General Manager 

Telephone~..l!l_- 2804 Ext. ___ _ 

Facsimile l.§1§J ..lZJ_- 2128 

B. Facili Location 

Temporary source? _Yes .lLNo Plant site location .......,#"-7-"M""o"'b"' Oe...,A"'v"'e"'nu.,e,__ ___ ___ _ 

City Sauoel Stale_lL Count~_,.,.c. t. "'CI"'a"'-r __ _ EPA Region_§_ 

Is the facility located within: 

Indian lands? _ YES _lL NO OCS waters? _YES _lL NO 

No,.·attainment area? ...X. YES _ NO If yes, for what air pollUtants? Ozone. PM2.5 

Within 50 miles of affected State? ..Jl YES 

C. Owner 

Name Veofia ES Tec:hnical Solutio!!S 

City Lombard 

NO' If yes, What State(s)? MO 

Street/P.O. Box 700 East But1etfleld Road SuHe 201 

State...JL_ ZJP 60148 

Telephone~~· 1756 Ext, ___ _ 

D. 0 erator 

Name Veolia ES Technical Solutions StreeVP.O. Box #7 Mobile Avenue 

City Sauoet State _I_L _ ZIP 62201 1069 

Telephone~ ..l!1._ -..l§!lL Ext. _ _ _ 

EPA Form 5900-79 

VES010056 
GIS 2 

E. 

Marl< only one peNni! application type and answer the supplementary question appropriate fe< the type 

marked. 

_ Initial Perm" _lL Renewal _ Significant Mod _ Minor Permit Mod(MPM) 

_ Group Processing, MPM Adminislrative Amendment 

For Initial permits, when did operations commence? __ ./ __ / _ _ 

For permit renewal, what Is the expiration date of current permit? ...J]_j 12 /. 2013 

F. 

Mark aU types of applicable requirements that apply . 

.X. SIP. FIPITIP PSD _ Non-aHalnment NSR 

.X. Minor source NSR Section 111 _ Phase I acid rain _ Phase II acid rain 

_ Stratospheric ozone _ OCS regulations ..X.NESHAP _Sec. 112(d) MACT 

_ Sec.112(g)MACT _ Early reduction of HAP _ Sec 1120) MACT _ RMP [Sec.112(r)] 

_ Tank Vessel requirements, sec. 183(f)) _ Section 129 Standards/Requirement 

_Consumer I comm .. products,§ 183(e) _ NAAQS, increments or visibility (temp. sources) 

Has a risk management plan been registered? _ YES _ NO Regulatory agency -~-

Phase II acid rain application submitted? _ YES _lLNO II yes, Perm"ting authority 

G. Source-Wide PTE Restrictions and Generic Applicable Requirements 

Cite and describe anvemissions..Jimitinq requirements and/or facllilv·wide •ooneric" apolicable requirements. 

40 CFR 71.6(a)(3)(ii) General Part 71 Reootdkeepiog. 

40 CFR 71.6(a)(3l(iii) Geoernl Patt 71 R.cvOI1in2. 

40 CFR 71.6(a)(3)(1) Perfotmi!UCe Tesling Facilities Provided. 

35 lAC 212.30 I Fuoitive particulate emissions beyond the vrooettv line nrohibited. 

35 V .. C 237.102 Open baming is prohibited except as provided by re211lation. 

35 lAC 212.123(aJ Opacitv is limited to less lhan 30% from anv emission ~;,; t unless subject to other requirements. 

40 CFR Part 82 Standards for recycJ.ins and emissions reduction of ozone depleting substances. 

3 5 IAC 244 Subpart C Maintain onsite a written Epis.ode Action Plan. 

40 CPR 61 Subpart FF Calculation of total annual benzene QuantitY and aov avnlicable reqllirements as indicated. 

EPA Form 5900·79 

VES010057 
GIS 3 

H. Process Oescrtptlon 

List orocesses, oroducts. and S IC codes for the facilitv. 

Process Products SIC 

Refuse Systems Not applicable 49$~ 

I. Emission Unit Identification 

Assign an emissions unit 10 and describe each emissions unit at the facility. Control equipment and/or alternative 

operating scenarios associated with emissions units should by listed on a separate line. Applicants may exclude 

from this list any ioslgnifloant emissiOns units or activities. 

Emissions Unit 10 Description of Unit 

Incinera.tion Unit #2 Fixed Hearth l.ncinerator wilh Maximum Heat Capacity of 16 ).I)JnBtufbr. 

SDA·2 Spray Dryer Absorber air poUution control device for Unit #2.. 

BH·2 Fabric Filter air pollution control device for Unit #2. 

locinerntion Unit #3 Fixed Hearth Incinerator with Maximum Heat Capacity of 161llJlllltulbr. 

SDA-3 Spray Dryer Absorber air pollution control de vic~ for Unit #3. 

BH-3 fabric Filter air pollution control device for Unit #3. 

Incineration Unit #4 Rotary Kilo locinerator (transportable) with Maximum Heat Capacity of 50 nunBtuihr. 

Tempering Chamber for Unit #4. 

·Activated Carbon Injection in Unit #4. 

SDA-4 Spray OI)'Or Absorber air pollution control device for Unit #4. 

BH-4 Fabric Filter air pollution control device [or Unit #4. 

Material Processing Area Waste Processing Areas #I fo.r processing/packaging of waste lll)d repackaging of 

#I (MP· l) conta.ineri:z.ed V/8~1e. 

Material Processing Area Waste Processing Areas #2 for processing/packaging of waste and repackllging of 

#2 (MP-2) containerized waste·. 

Activated Carbon Absorption pollution control device for MP-2. 

Lab Pack Repack Area Waste Processing proce.ssing/packaging and ropackagjng of lab pack wastes. 

Drum Crusher Empty drums are crushed in a three-sided partial enclosureStorage Tanks for Liquid Tank-s: #2 (4,391 gals.), ll4 (4,931 gals.), #6 (7,200 '"Is.), f#J (5,820 gals.), #10 (12,869 

Wastes and #2 Fuel Oil gals.), #20 (12,869 gals.), #30 (12,869 gals.), 1140 (12,869 gals.), #50 (12,869 gals.), fl{jl) 

1~.869 gols.), #300 (19,850 gals.), #'302 (30,000 gals.), #304 (30,000 gals.), #306 (30,000 

gals.), #308 (30,000 gals.), 11310 (30,000 gals.), #312 (10,000 gals.), #3 14 (10,000 gals.). 

Activated Carbon Absorption pollution. control devices for Storage Tank Veuts. 

Storage Tank for 112 Fuel ~11390 (30,000 gals.), 

Oil 

EPA Form 5900 ·79 

VESOI0058