alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT NO. 6  TO REVOLVING CREDIT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
  BACKGROUND
    Definitions
 Amendment
  Fiscal Quarter Ending:
    
    Leverage Ratio:September 30, 2009
    
    
    5.25 to 1.0December 31, 2009
    
    
    5.00 to 1.0March 31, 2010
    
    
    6.75 to 1.0June 30, 2010
    
    
    8.25 to 1.0September 30, 2010
    
    
    7.00 to 1.0December 31, 2010 and each fiscal quarter ending thereafter
    
    
    5.50 to 1.0




---



##### 



Conditions of Effectiveness
 Representations, Warranties and Covenants
      Effect on the Loan Agreement
   2




---



##### 



Release
 Governing Law
 Cost and Expenses
 Headings
 3




---



##### 



Counterparts; Facsimile Signatures
  4




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Lender and as AgentBy:
    /s/ John TrieuName:
    John TrieuTitle:
    VPDRI CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ David L. TurneyName:
    David L. TurneyTitle:
    President, CEO, ChairmanDIGITAL RECORDERS, INC.By:
    /s/ David L. TurneyName:
    David L. TurneyTitle:
    President, CEO, ChairmanTWINVISION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.By:
    /s/ David L. TurneyName:
    David L. TurneyTitle:
    President, CEO, Chairman
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Biophysics and Biochemistry Fellowship Review, December 13, 2023, 11:00 a.m. to December 13, 2023, 05:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 28, 2023, 88 FR 83143, Doc 2023-26127.                

This meeting is being amended to change the meeting panel name from “Biophysics and Biochemistry Fellowship Review” to “Topics in Biophysics and Biochemistry”. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: November 30, 2023. 

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-26667 Filed 12-4-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135457 & (17) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 135457 

 COA: 279393 

Saginaw CC: 94-008764-FC 

MICHAEL EARL YOUNG,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 14, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion for remand is DENIED. 

s0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of T-3 Energy Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
J. Brading, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Steven J. Brading
--------------------------------

Steven J. Brading
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
From: John Mietus

Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 4:31 PM

To: 'esta.rosenberg@dot.gov'; 'thuy.cooper@dot.gov'

Cc: Bill Evans Subject: FW: POLL: Centurion Application for Brazil Start

- Up Extension



### Hello again! We’ve completed the poll of the US carrier served with this extension request, and there
are no objections.

Best regards, John

From: John Mietus

Sent: Wedn esday, October 20, 2010 4:59 PM

To: 'nssparks@fedex.com'; 'dvaughan@kelleydrye.com'; 'dfisher@kelleydrye.com'; 'hershel.kamen@coair.com'; 'dan.weiss@coair.com'; 'rpommer@atlasair.com'; 'pmurphy@ggh

airlaw.com'; 'kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com'; 'peter. beckett@polaraircargo.com'

Cc: 'esta.rosenberg@dot.gov'; 'thuy.cooper@dot.gov'; 'info@airlineinfo.com'; 'Brian.Hedberg@dot.gov';

Bill Evans Subject: POLL: Centurion Application for Brazil Start

- Up Extension



### Enclosed please find a copy of Centurion Air Car go’s application to extend the start

- up condition for its

US

- Brazil frequencies for an additional 90 days.
Please respond with your carrier’s position on the application.

Thanks and best regards, John

_________________________ John Mietus

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 6701 Democracy Blvd Ste 300
Bethesda, MD 20817

- 7500 (202) 747

- 5212 (240) 396

- 5362 fax john@mietuslaw.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this e

- mail and any attachments may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected

from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not review, use, disclose, distribute or copy the information it contains; destroy this e

- mail and notify the sender by reply e

- mail or an e

- mail to admin@mietuslaw.com

. Thanks.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Sheirin (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 16, 2021 - 8:04amThank you for sharing these stories. After last Wednesday it’s a relief to remember that so many in our country still believe in service to it. Thank you for you hard work and patriotism.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
... 

SERVED: FEBRUARY 19, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTERS OF 

REGENT AEROSPACE CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 0851 

AND 

REGENT AEROSPACE CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0852 

ORDER ON VENUE 

Venue was designated as Los Angeles, CA. 

The FAA has requested venue in Indianapolis. Counsel for Respondent is located 

in Chicago. The president of Respondent appears to be located in Indiana. 

The court has no preference on venue. 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to advise the court on ' 

or before May I, 2014 where they prefer this matter to be heard. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Reza Soltanian, Respondent's President 

Regent Aerospace Corporation and Airbase Services, Inc. 

28110 West Harrison Parkway, 

Valencia, CA 91355-4109 

TEL: 661-257-3000 

FAX: 661-702-0241 

JohnS. Hoff 

Jeffrey Clement 

Respondent's Counsels 

Hoff Law Group 

135 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 3300 

Chicago, IL 60603-4134 

TEL: 312-346-8111 

FAX: 312-853-3924 

Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel, Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7713 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0851 & 

FAA-2013-0852 

(Civil Penalty Actions) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1337** 

DONALD TRANTHAM, JR. , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. HENRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY, County of Henry; GARDNER GARDNER BARROW & SHARPE; MARTINSVILL E, VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTMENT; VIRGINIA STATE POLICE; MARTINSVILLE HENRY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY , Defendants

– Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Danville
. Jac kson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. ( 4:10

- cv - 00058

- jlk

- mfu )

Submitted : June 16, 2011 Decided: June 20, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Donald Trantham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jim H. Guynn, Jr., GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, PC, Salem, Virginia; Philip Grahem Gardner, GARDNER BARROW SHARPE & REYNOLDS, Martinsville, Virginia; Martha White Medley, Michael Anthony N i cholas, DANIEL, MEDL E Y & KIRBY, PC, Da nville, Virginia; George Walerian Chabalewski, Christina Nicole Gilliam, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Nor a Beth Dorsey, Jodi2 Beth Simopoulos, HANCOCK DANIEL JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Glen Allen, Virginia; Thomas Linn Eckert, A ssistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 P ER CURIAM: Donald Trantham, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing Trantham’s claims against all Defendants
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Trantham v. Henry Cnty. Sheriff’s Office , No. 4:10

- cv 00058

- jlk

- mfu (W.D. Va. Mar. 10, 2011) . We dispense with oral
argumen t because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
MARK KHALIL SALAMEH

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 2061

____ _________________________/

Opinion filed July 10, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela Cox , Judge

.

Mark Khalil Salameh, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, MAKAR, and JAY, JJ. CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the twelve month
period ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       7,908,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,924,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   506,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,115,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,508,000
<PP&E>                                       4,068,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,601,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,202,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,015,000
<BONDS>                                      3,152,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       140,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,811,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,202,000
<SALES>                                     30,209,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,209,000
<CGS>                                        8,552,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,552,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            24,166,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                96,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (144,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,365,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    59,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,424,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,424,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
#### Richard F. OVERCAST, Appellant (Defendant below), v. Richard D. BALDWIN, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

No. 4509.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Jan. 9, 1976.

*465Larry L. Jorgenson, King & Jorgenson, Jackson, signed the brief and appeared in oral argument on behalf of appellant

Robert B. Ranck, Ranck & Bommer, Jackson, signed the brief and waived oral argument on behalf of appellee.

Before GUTHRIE, C. J., and Mc-CLINTOCK, RAPER, THOMAS and ROSE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

By a written contract the defendant-appellant agreed to build a home for plaintiff-appellee for $20,000.00, including the basement. At the conclusion of the construction, defendant furnished plaintiff with a written warranty covering “ * * * any work found to be defective in workmanship or materials * * *The walls of the basement of the home started to crack and would have collapsed and dropped the house if plaintiff had not employed someone else to restore them and place the structure on an adequate foundation.

The defendant claimed he had only signed the contract and warranty as an accommodation in order that plaintiff could obtain financing and he was only to furnish a prebuilt modular home, installed on a basement foundation furnished by the owner.

The only written agreements show clearly that he was the contractor and the foundation basement was to be subcontracted and included in the $20,000.00 price. The testimony was in conflict. The trial judge specifically found in his oral ruling following trial that the defendant was responsible under the warranty; as the prime contractor, for the work of the subcontractor and he was paid an additional sum of money to be the general contractor. The evidence shows that the construction was defective and the fault of the subcontractor.

We do not rewrite clear contracts. *Younglove v. Graham and Hill,*Wyo.1974, 526 P.2d 689, 692. As said in *Hendrickson v. Heinze,*Wyo.1975, 541 P.2d 1133, 1134, and the cases there cited and referred to:

> “ ‘ * * * We must assume that evidence in favor of the successful party is true, leave out of consideration entirely evidence of the unsuccessful party in conflict therewith, and give to the evidence of the successful party every favorable inference which may be reasonably and fairly drawn from it. * * * ’ ”

After a careful review of the record, we can find no error. Defendant is liable to the plaintiff for costs of repair in accordance with the trial court’s money judgment.

Affirmed.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Captain Smith and Pocahontas
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Constantino Brumidi

Location
      
Capitol Rotunda

Pocahontas saves Captain John Smith, one of the founders of Jamestown, Virginia, from being clubbed to death. Her father, Chief Powhatan, is seated at the left. This scene is the first showing English settlement. (1607)

About the Frieze of American History

The frieze in the Rotunda of the United States Capitol contains a painted panorama depicting significant events in American history. Thomas U. Walter's 1859 cross-section drawing of the new dome (constructed 1855-1863) shows a recessed belt atop the Rotunda walls with relief sculpture.

Eventually it was painted in true fresco, a difficult and exacting technique in which the pigments are applied directly onto wet plaster. As the plaster cures the colors become part of the wall. Consequently, each section of plaster must be painted the day it is laid. The frieze is painted in grisaille, a monochrome of whites and browns that resembles sculpture. It measures 8 feet 4 inches in height and approximately 300 feet in circumference. It starts 58 feet above the floor. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2016202EN.01001901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/19

---

Article 6

(ex Article 6 TEU)

(ex Article 6 TEU)

1.   The Union recognises the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union of 7 December 2000, as adapted at Strasbourg, on 12 December 2007, which shall have the same legal value as the Treaties.

The provisions of the Charter shall not extend in any way the competences of the Union as defined in the Treaties.

The rights, freedoms and principles in the Charter shall be interpreted in accordance with the general provisions in Title VII of the Charter governing its interpretation and application and with due regard to the explanations referred to in the Charter, that set out the sources of those provisions.

2.   The Union shall accede to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Such accession shall not affect the Union's competences as defined in the Treaties.

3.   Fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, shall constitute general principles of the Union's law.

---
#### State v. Koerte

17388

9/23/96

Affirmed
21821

#### Machado v. Police Com’n of County of Kauai

Affirmed