alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30143 Conference Calendar

__________________ ROGER AKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus CHARLES C. FOTI, JR., and DENTAL DEPARTMENT, Defendants, CHARLES C. FOTI, JR., Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-3166
- - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Roger Akins appeals the district court's judgment in favor of the defendant in his civil rights complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Review of the findings and conclusions depends on a trial transcript. Akins has failed to provide a transcript. His appeal is therefore DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. SeeNo. 95-30143 -2- Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); Powell v. Estelle , 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 113 S. Ct. 668 (1992); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. APPEAL DISMISSED.
February 8, 2001

23196

#### State v. Tabajunda

Affirmed
23995

#### State v. Coleman

Vacated and Remanded
20677

#### State v. Ogata

Affirmed
Exhibit 99.a.



          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of CDI Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respect, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


                                                        /s/ Roger H. Ballou
                                                        --------------------=
                                                        Roger H. Ballou
                                                        Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  March 26, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CDI Corporation and will be retained by CDI Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>

                               Exhibit 99.b.



          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of CDI Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respect, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


                                                        /s/ Jay G. Stuart
                                                        ----------------------
                                                        Jay G. Stuart
                                                        Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  March 26, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CDI Corporation and will be retained by CDI Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centennial
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended August 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officer's knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: October 12, 2004

/s/ Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
-------------------------
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

          Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
          ss.1350)

          Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
          ss.1350), the undersigned,  Joseph V. Roberts, Chief Executive Officer
          of Nutrition  Management Services Company, a Pennsylvania  corporation
          (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

          The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005
          of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
          section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and
          the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                 /s/ Joseph V. Roberts
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Joseph V. Roberts
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

          May 23, 2005
```
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Protecting Agriculture

Last Modified: 

Print

WS' operational activities to protect agriculture occur on farms, ranches,

aquaculture facilities, forested lands, and other sites across the nation.

Livestock Predators 

Aquaculture 

Invasive Species 
Beaver Damage 

Starlings and Blackbirds 

Vultures 

Waterfowl 

Wildlife Rabies 
Wildlife Disease
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20837 Conference Calender

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DEBORAH HOFFMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR H-96-39-2
- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Deborah Hoffman has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the brief, Hoffman’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.No. - 2 -
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 229 (Thursday, November 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 83576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]


Indian Gaming; Approval of Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact 
Between Redding Rancheria, California and the State of California

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval of the Tribal-State Compact 
between the Redding Rancheria, California and the State of California.

DATES: The Compact takes effect on November 30, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#743d1a101d151a3315191d1a1334161d155a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="632a0d070a020d24020e0a0d0423010a024d040c15">[email protected]</span></a>; (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all 
compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the 
Secretary. The Compact permits the Tribe to offer certain forms of 
Class III gaming. The Compact is approved.

Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023-26376 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,315,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,459,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,403,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   516,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,070,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,605,000
<PP&E>                                       4,689,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,340,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,793,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,391,000
<BONDS>                                      3,152,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       143,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,094,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,793,000
<SALES>                                     38,856,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,856,000
<CGS>                                       11,645,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,645,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            22,121,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               120,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (115,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,205,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   407,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,798,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,798,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 7, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 28, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 118 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-78, CP2024-80.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-26816 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IV 

House Calendar No. 56 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 408 

[Report No. 114–256] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 64) disapproving 

of the agreement transmitted to Congress by the President on July 

19, 2015, relating to the nuclear program of Iran; and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

64) disapproving of the agreement transmitted to Congress by the President on July 19, 2015, relating to 

the nuclear program of Iran; and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the joint resolu3 tion (H.J. Res. 64) disapproving of the agreement trans4 mitted to Congress by the President on July 19, 2015, 

5 relating to the nuclear program of Iran. All points of order 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 408 RH 

1 against consideration of the joint resolution are waived. 

2 The joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points 

3 of order against provisions in the joint resolution are 

4 waived. The previous question shall be considered as or5 dered on the joint resolution and on any amendment 

6 thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 

7 (1) ten hours of debate equally divided among and con8 trolled by the respective chairs and ranking minority mem9 bers of the Committees on Foreign Affairs, Financial 

10 Services, the Judiciary, Oversight and Government Re11 form, and Ways and Means; (2) a final period of debate 

12 which shall not exceed one hour equally divided and con13 trolled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

14 Committee on Foreign Affairs; and (3) one motion to re15 commit. 

16 SEC. 2. Upon receipt of a message from the Senate 

17 transmitting House Joint Resolution 61 with a Senate 

18 amendment to the text thereof consisting only of the text 

19 of House Joint Resolution 64 as passed by the House, the 

20 House shall be considered to have taken from the Speak21 er’s table House Joint Resolution 61, with the Senate 

22 amendment to the text thereof and any amendment to the 

23 title thereof, and to have concurred in the Senate amend24 ment or amendments. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 56 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 408 

[Report No. 114–256] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

Iran; and for other purposes. 19, 2015, relating to the nuclear program of transmitted to Congress by the President on July (H.J. Res. 64) disapproving of the agreement 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000879465
<NAME>                        TEKINSIGHT.COM, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,499,000
<SECURITIES>                                   1,215,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,474,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   248,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,486,100
<PP&E>                                         616,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,160,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 36,135,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,994,000
<BONDS>                                        18,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,000
<COMMON>                                       2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,897,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   36,135,000
<SALES>                                        18,852,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               18,852,000
<CGS>                                          14,632,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,632,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,307,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,246,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,246,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 67,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,179,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.25)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7898

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROY STEVE DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-89-407-A; CA-05-1209-1)

Submitted: February 10, 2006 Decided: March 6, 2006

Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Vacated by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Steve Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Owen Matthew Kendler, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Roy Steve Davis mailed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2244

(2000) for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000) motion to the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Virginia. While Davis directed his motion to

this court, the district court improperly docketed the motion as

one in that court under § 2255. The district court then entered an

order construing the motion as one seeking authorization to file a

successive § 2255 motion and denied it. Davis timely appealed. 

Under § 2244, a motion seeking authorization to file a

successive § 2255 motion “shall be determined by a three-judge

panel of the court of appeals.” § 2244(b)(3)(B). Because Davis

clearly sought authorization from this court under § 2244, the

district court lacked jurisdiction to act on it. Accordingly, we

vacate the district court’s order. By separate order entered this

day, we direct that Davis’ § 2244 motion be filed and docketed in

this court. We will then review and act on the motion in due

course. 

Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order. We

deny Davis’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED
March 21, 2006

25477

#### State v. Giese

Affirmed
April 19, 1999

21286

#### State v. Myrick

Affirmed
127 P.3d 103

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Alvarez.

26725

12/21/2005

Affirmed