alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,564<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                     6,436
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,401
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          23,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         35,064
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,930
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,242
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,244
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (906)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,449
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (121)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,570
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
<FN>
<F1>Includes $898 restricted.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION
OF
SERIES K SENIOR CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
OF
DRI CORPORATION
   Section 1.
    
    Designation and Amount. The shares of this series shall be
designated as Series K Senior Convertible Preferred Stock
(the Series K Preferred Stock) and the number of shares
constituting the Series K Preferred Stock shall be 325 shares.
Such number of shares may be increased or decreased by
resolution of the Board of Directors; provided, that no
decrease shall reduce the number of shares of Series K
Preferred Stock to a number less than the number of shares then
outstanding plus the number of shares reserved for issuance
upon the exercise of outstanding options, rights or warrants or
upon the conversion of any outstanding securities issued by the
Corporation convertible into Series K Preferred Stock.
 Section 2.
    
    Dividends and Distributions.
 provided however provided however
 1




---



##### 



st
 2




---



##### 



Section 3.
    
    Voting Rights. In addition to any voting rights provided by
law, the holders of Series K Preferred Stock shall be entitled
to vote with the holders of Common Stock, voting together as a
single class, on any matters on which holders of Common Stock
are entitled to vote, and the holder of each outstanding whole
or fractional share of Series K Preferred Stock shall be
entitled to a number of votes equal to the quotient obtained by
dividing the Liquidation Preference thereof by the then
applicable Conversion Price as determined by Section 6.
Fractional votes shall not, however, be permitted and any
fractional voting rights resulting from the above formula
(after aggregating all whole and fractional shares of Series K
Preferred Stock held by each holder) shall be adjusted downward
to the nearest whole number.
 Section 4.
    
    Liquidation.
   3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



Section 5.
    
    Redemption.
     5




---



##### 



Section 6.
    
    Conversion of Series K Preferred Stock. Each holder of shares of Series K
Preferred Stock shall have the right to convert all or any portion of such shares as such
holder desires to convert, and in certain circumstances such shares shall be automatically
converted, into shares of the Common Stock of the Corporation, as follows:
 Optional Conversion
 6




---



##### 



Automatic Conversion
 provided
 Mechanics of Conversion.
 7




---



##### 



Adjustments to Conversion Price
 Adjustments for Subdivisions, Common Stock Dividends,
Combinations or Consolidations of Common Stock.
 Adjustments for Reclassification, Exchange and
Substitution.
 Certificate as to Adjustments.
 8




---



##### 



No Impairment.
 Reservation of Stock.
 Cancellation of Series K Preferred Stock
 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                             271
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                       255
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,846
<PP&E>                                           4,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,886
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,334
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,886
<SALES>                                          5,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,606
<CGS>                                            1,464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,998)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,998)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)
        

</TABLE>
May 31, 2006

27107

#### State v. Williams

Affirmed
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-95705  of  Applebee's  International,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report  dated
February 13, 2002,  appearing  in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of  Applebee's
International, Inc. for the year ended December 30, 2001.

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-01969  of  Applebee's  International,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report  dated
February 13, 2002,  appearing  in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of  Applebee's
International, Inc. for the year ended December 30, 2001.

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-17823  of  Applebee's  International,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report  dated
February 13, 2002,  appearing  in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of  Applebee's
International, Inc. for the year ended December 30, 2001.

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-17825  of  Applebee's  International,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report  dated
February 13, 2002,  appearing  in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of  Applebee's
International, Inc. for the year ended December 30, 2001.

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-70656  of  Applebee's  International,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report  dated
February 13, 2002,  appearing  in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of  Applebee's
International, Inc. for the year ended December 30, 2001.
September 26, 2006

26268

#### Aitken v. State, Dept. of Educ.

Affirmed
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 16, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01298-CV

TEXAS TRUE CHOICE, INC., Appellant

V.

BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-11409

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Stoddart, and Schenck 

Opinion by Justice Schenck

Before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant has 

informed the Court that it no longer desires to pursue the appeal. Accordingly, we grant 

appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

141298F.P05

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID SCHENCK

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TEXAS TRUE CHOICE, INC., Appellant

No. 05-14-01298-CV V.

BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-11409.

Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. 

Justices Lang and Stoddart, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM recover its costs of 

this appeal from appellant TEXAS TRUE CHOICE, INC.

Judgment entered this 16th day of April, 2015.
2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 7-3-2007 

# B ri se no -F lores v

. Atty Ge n U SA P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 05-5323

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " B r i s e no -Flor e s v

. Atty Ge n U SA" (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 666. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/666P RE CE DE NT I AL I N TH E UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS

F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

_______________ N o: 05- 5323

_______________ J ESU S BR I SEN O - FLO RE S, Pet i t i oner v. A TTO RN EY G EN ER A L O F TH E U N I TED STA TES,

R es pondent

_______________ Pet i t i on forR evi ew of an O r derof the U ni t ed St at es D epart m entof J us t i ce B o a rd o f Im m ig ra tio n A p p e a ls ( B I A N o. A 74- 992- 241) Im m i grat i on Judg e D on al d V . F erl i se

_______________ A r gued M ay8, 2007 B e f o re : R E N D E L L a n d J O R D A N , C i r cui tJudges a n d V A N A S K IE * , D is tr i ct Judge ( O pi ni on Fi l ed J une 26, 2007)2 _______________ R o g e r R . L a g u n a , J r. [ ARGUE D] L aguna, R ey es & M al oney 1119 N or t h Fr ontSt r eet H arr i s bur g, PA 17102 C ouns el f orP et i t i oner R i char d M . E vans E m il yA . R ad fo rd D avi d E . D auenhe i m er B l ai rT . O ’ C onnor G jo n Ju n c a

j [ ARGUE D] U ni t ed St at es D epart m entof J us t i ce O ffi ce of I m m i gr at i on L i t i gat i on P. O . B ox 878 B en Fr ankl i n St at i on W as hi ngt on, D C 20044

_______________ OR DE R A M E NDI NG OP I NI ON

_______________ J O R D A N , C i r cui tJudge . IT IS N O W O R D E R E D i n the abo ve-capti on ed case th a t th e O p in io n b e a m e n d e d a s f o llo w s: F o o tn o te 2 sh a ll n o w re a d :3 B r i s eno al s o as ks t hi s C our tt o s t ayt he vol unt arydepartur e per i od gr ant ed t o hi m byt he B I A . T hatappl i cat i on w i l l be addr es s ed i n a s e p a ra te o rd e r. / s /K entA . J or dan C i r cui tJ udge D A T E D : J ul y3, 2007 *H onor abl e Thom as I . V anas ki e, D i s t r i ctC our tJ udge forthe M i ddl e D i s t r i ctof Penns y l vani a, s i t t i ng by des i gnat i on.
Exhibit
4.4


 


NOTE
MODIFICATION AGREEMENT


 


This
Note Modification Agreement is made effective June 30, 2015, by and between Meriwether Mezzanine Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership (“Lender”) and
Summit Semiconductor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Borrower”),
and modifies and amends certain terms of Borrower’s indebtedness evidenced by a promissory note in favor of Lender
dated January 5, 2015 in the original principal amount of $500,000.00 (the “Note”),
which is secured in part by a Loan and Security Agreement dated as of dated January 5, 2015 and a UCC-1 Financing Statement
filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on January 8, 2015 as Filing No. 2015-0085851 (the “Security
Documents”).


 


For
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Note is hereby modified and
amended as follows:


 


A.          The
Note is amended as follows:


 


“Maturity
Date” means July 25, 2015.


 


Except as herein
specifically modified, all of the terms and conditions of the Note, the Security Documents and all documents and agreements related
thereof shall remain in full force and effect.


 


BORROWER:


 


	 	SUMMIT
    SEMICONDUCTOR LLC, a Delaware limited liability company


 


	 	By:	
	 	 	Brett Moyer, Chief
    Executive Officer


 


LENDER:


 


	 	MERIWETHER
    MEZZANINE PARTNERS, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership


 


	 	By: MMP
    GENERAL PARTNER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its general partner


 


		By:	
	 	 	David Howitt, sole
    member


 








    	 	1
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply582Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Michael Lily (... (not verified)PermalinkNovember 22, 2017 - 9:24amAgain thank you for this wonderful trip thru our Capital.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Johnny RUSSELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-76-436.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Feb. 18, 1977.

Rehearing Denied March 14, 1977.

*1004Whit Pate, Poteau, for appellant.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., Robert L. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., Michael L. Darrah, Legal Intern, for appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, Johnny Russell, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court, LeFlore County, for the offense of Sodomy, Case No. CRF-75-144. From a jury sentence of ten (10) years, defendant perfects this appeal.

The facts are relevant here only so far as they deal with the voir dire examination. During the voir dire, defendant challenged, for cause the wife of a juror already empaneled. The court overruled this challenge as defendant failed to show bias or partiality.

The defendant’s sole assignment of error asserts that allowing a husband and wife to sit on the same jury denies the defendant his right to be tried by a fair and impartial jury as required by the Constitutions of the United States and Oklahoma. The defendant attempts to stabilize his argument by rallying behind him numerous citations which declare the sacred right to a public trial, and a fair and impartial jury. We agree; however, neither the Constitution nor our statutes prohibit a husband and wife from serving on the same jury. Defendant wishes us to assume, as he does, that an inherent fault exists when a married couple sits on the same jury; that they will necessarily “track” each other’s thoughts. Such an assumption is without merit. The means exist to search for this tracking and a party should make use of the liberal rules of voir dire to do so. *Gonzales v. State,*Okl.Cr., 388 P.2d 312 (1964). Undoubtedly, married couples will be found that are unable to divorce one another’s thoughts during a trial, but when voir dire uncovers no bias, partiality, or inability to form independent thought a party should not be excluded. The Legislature has provided for challenges of implied bias and has expressly limited the parties within this category. See 22 O.S.1971, § 660. Married couples are not included therein. A party cannot rest his claims of error on conjecture alone, as the law must concern itself with facts and evidences, not vaporous speculations. *Dennis*v. *United States,*339 U.S. 162, 70 S.Ct. 519, 94 L.Ed. 734 (1950).

From the above and foregoing reasons, the judgment and sentence appealed from is *AFFIRMED.*
September 18, 2006

26821

#### Vanstory v. State

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 984 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 984

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 
     Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2015

  Mr. Fortenberry (for himself and Mr. Cole) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 
     Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY 
              STUDY.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(46) Chief standing bear national historic trail.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Chief Standing Bear Trail, 
                extending approximately 550 miles from Niobrara, 
                Nebraska, to Ponca City, Oklahoma, which follows the 
                route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca people 
                during Federal Indian removal, and approximately 550 
                miles from Ponca City, Oklahoma, through Omaha, 
                Nebraska, to Niobrara, Nebraska, which follows the 
                return route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca 
                people, as generally depicted on the map entitled 
                `Chief Standing Bear National Historic Trail 
                Feasibility Study', numbered 903/125,630, and dated 
                November 2014.
                    ``(B) Availability of map.--The map described in 
                subparagraph (A) shall be on file and available for 
                public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 
                Department of the Interior.
                    ``(C) Components.--The feasibility study conducted 
                under subparagraph (A) shall include a determination on 
                whether the Chief Standing Bear Trail meets the 
                criteria described in subsection (b) for designation as 
                a national historic trail.
                    ``(D) Considerations.--In conducting the 
                feasibility study under subparagraph (A), the Secretary 
                of the Interior shall consider input from owners of 
                private land within or adjacent to the study area.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.12
 
 
 SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION
 OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
 CENTRAL
ILLINOIS LIGHT COMPANY
 (required
by Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)
 
 
 In
connection with the report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004 of Central Illinois Light Company (the “Company”) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I,
Warner L. Baxter, chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:
March 9, 2005
  ****/s/ Warner L.
  BaxterWarner L. BaxterExecutive Vice President
      andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
  Officer)
Appeal No. 2022AP361-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2019CF157

STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT IV

STATE OF WISCONSIN,

 PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

 V.

SUZANNE LEE SHEGONEE,

 DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FILED

October 28, 

2022

Sheila T. Reiff

Clerk of Court of Appeals

ERRATA SHEET

Sheila T. Reiff

Clerk of Court of Appeals

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District I

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District III

Electronic Notice

Christina Plum, Sarah Motiff

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District II

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District IV

Electronic Notice

Hon. Richard A. Radcliffe

Circuit Court Judge

Electronic Notice

Laura Endres

Clerk of Circuit Court

Monroe County Courthouse

Electronic Notice

Kevin D. Croninger

Electronic Notice

Katie R. York

Electronic Notice

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that corrections were made to paragraph 16

in the above-captioned opinion which was released on October 27, 2022. A 
No. 2022AP361-CR

2

corrected electronic version in its entirety is available on the court’s website at 

www.wicourts.gov. 
No. 2022AP361-CR

3
21942

#### Maui Lea Time Interval Ass'n v. County of Maui

Affirmed