alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:   November 10, 2004              /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                       Name:   James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                       Title:  Chief Executive Officer

                                      A   signed   original   of  this   written
                                      statement required by Section 906 has been
                                      provided to CNL Income  Fund XI, Ltd.  and
                                      will be  retained  by CNL Income  Fund XI,
                                      Ltd. and furnished to the  Securities  and
                                      Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon
                                      request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6785

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAOUL LAFOND, a/k/a Chris Lafond, a/k/a Jim, a/k/a Jamaican 

Jim, a/k/a Derrick Burch, a/k/a Fletcher Busbee, a/k/a 

Ronald Elie, a/k/a Ronald Ely,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (6:96-cr-00212-WO-1; 1:12-cv-01200-

WO-JEP)

Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 26, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raoul Lafond, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela 

Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raoul Lafond seeks to appeal from the district court’s 

order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendations and 

(1) denying Lafond’s motions for default judgment and motion to 

dismiss, and (2) construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as 

a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it as 

successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Lafond has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 
3

Additionally, we deny Lafond’s motions for entry of default and 

for release on bail pending appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd. at September 30, 1997, and its statement of
income for the nine months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd. for the nine months ended
September 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,262,101
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,364
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      26,016,146
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,340,464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,775,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,291,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,775,010
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,824,396
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  533,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,403,064
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,403,064
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,403,064
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd. has an unclassified
balance sheet, therefore no values are shown above for current assets and
current liabilities.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
November 15, 1996

16584

#### Kafentzis v. AZABU U.S.A., Corp.; Azabu U.S.A. Corp. v. Kafentzis

Order No. 96-39

Affirmed
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE X

SOCIAL POLICY

SOCIAL POLICY

Article 152

The Union recognises and promotes the role of the social partners at its level, taking into account the diversity of national systems. It shall facilitate dialogue between the social partners, respecting their autonomy.

The Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment shall contribute to social dialogue.

---
- - 

# MARTINEZ AERIAL VIDEO SERVICES'

REAL ESTATE, INDUSTRIAL, AGRICULTURAL, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL 515 E. BARRUS PLACE CASAGRANDE ARIZONA 85122-1601 (520)705-4268 (602) 650-0684 Eman: kd7gmk@gmail.com www.martinezaerial.com U.S. Department ofTransportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Exemption Request Section 333 ofthe FAA Reform Act ofthe FederalAviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. Part 21; 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a)&(b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b) (2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 119.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a)&(b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409(a) (2); 91.417(a)&(b) 

### Exemption No.13415 Regulatory DocketNo. FAA-2015-3523 December 13,2015 Dear Sir, I amrequesting an amendment to my original Section 333 ExemptionNo. 13415 in orderto add local search & rescue and law enforcement operations by local police agencies too small to operate their own sUAS and lacking certificatedpilots. I have been approachbythem and they have expressed an interest. With very best regards,

Luis Martinez Owner/ChiefPilot
#### Sedillo v. Tanaka

16694

12/16/93

Affirmed
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 6/26/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

PHILLIP CORDOVA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

vs.

LAWRENCE BARRERAS,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 95-2180

(D.C. No. CIV-95-819-JP)

(D.N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Cordova, an inmate appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the

dismissal of his Motion for Injunction and/or Mandamus seeking transfer to another

correctional facility. He contends that his transfer to an out-of-state facility was a result

of racial discrimination. The district court treated the motion as a complaint and

dismissed it pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) because it was obvious that the claim was
- 2 -

barred by res judicata and therefore without merit. See Yellen v. Cooper, 828 F.2d 1471

(10th Cir. 1987). We review the district court’s dismissal for an abuse of discretion. 

Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). Mr. Cordova attacked his transfer in a

separate prior action on different grounds. Res judicata precludes the litigation of issues

that were or could have been raised in the prior action. Klein v. Zavaras, 80 F.3d 432,

434 (10th Cir. 1996). The district court acted well within its discretion. 

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 24.15
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


The  undersigned,  as Controller  of  Southwestern  Electric  Power Company (the
"Company"),  hereby makes,  constitutes and appoints Michael H. Madison his true
and lawful  attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power and authority to execute
in the name and on behalf of the  undersigned,  in any and all  capacities,  the
Company's  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K  for  1999  and any and all  amendments
thereto, to be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and
any other documents and instruments  incidental  thereto,  and to file the same,
with all exhibits  thereto and all documents in connection  therewith,  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission,  hereby granting to such  attorney-in-fact,
and agent,  full power and  authority  of  substitution  and  revocation  in the
premises  and full power and  authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully for
all intents  and  purposes  as the  undersigned  might or could do in person and
hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact and agent, may do
or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have hereunto  executed this Power of Attorney this 26th
day of January, 2000.


                                                /s/ R. Russell Davis
                                                R. Russell Davis
                                                Controller



Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26th day of January, 2000 by R. Russell
Davis.


                                                /s/ Kit Hill
                                                Notary Public
                                                State of Oklahoma

My Commission Expires:  June 14, 2001
#### Suzanne De G. Hyde et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Everett Van Kleeck *&*Co., Inc. et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Ulster County,

March 18, 1959.

*N. Jansen Fowler*for plaintiffs.

*Howard C. St. John*for defendants.

Donald S. Taylor, J.

Plaintiffs, Hyde as the owner of a past-due note, and Morris and Ortmann as minority stockholders of defendant corporation, sue for an injunction restraining defend*376ant corporation and the individual defendant, as president, from consummating a contract of sale of the corporation’s real property. Correlative relief is also sought. The defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to certain of the Rules of Civil Practice. The plaintiffs have cross-moved for a temporary injunction.

Only defendants’ motion pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency need be considered.

It is unnecessary to recite in detail the allegations of the complaint since it is clear therefrom that, at best, plaintiffs have alleged an action for waste and breach of a fiduciary duty. Waste, mismanagement and interference with the corporation’s business are wrongs only to the corporation and must be redressed by means of a suit by, or in behalf of, the corporation. According every fair intendment and inference to the facts alleged in the complaint, they give rise to an action which is derivative in character and is not available to the stockholders as individuals. *(Belojf*v. *Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y.,*300 N. Y. 11, 18; *Isaac*v. *Marcus,*258 N. Y. 257, 264; *Niles*v. *New York Cent. & Hudson Riv. R. R. Co.,*176 N. Y. 119; *Myer*v. *Myer,*271 App. Div. 465, 473-474, affd. 296 N. Y. 979; *Paulson*v. *Margolis,*234 App. Div. 496; *Sigl, Inc.*v. *Bresnahan,*216 App. Div. 634, 638; *November*v. *National Exhibition Co.,*10 Misc 2d 537, 541; *Manowits*v. *Colorado Min. Corp.,*135 N. Y. S. 2d 714; General Corporation Law, § 61.)

Until judgment has been obtained and execution returned unsatisfied, no cause of action under either section 60 of the General Corporation Law or section 15 of the Stock Corporation Law accrued to plaintiff Hyde. *(Buttles*v. *Smith,*281 N. Y. 226.) Likewise, the allegations of the complaint are wholly insufficient to bring it, as to her, within the provisions of article 10 of the Debtor and Creditor Law.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted with leave to the plaintiffs to serve an amended complaint, if so advised, within 20 days after service upon their attorney of a copy of the order to be entered hereon with notice of entry thereof.

The cross motion of the plaintiffs is denied and the *lis pendens*heretofore filed in the action is cancelled and discharged. *(Gross*v. *Price,*283 App. Div. 1107.)

Submit order.

The papers will go forward with the signed order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                             299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,331
<ALLOWANCES>                                       746
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,990
<PP&E>                                           5,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,496
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,798
<SALES>                                          4,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,805
<CGS>                                              963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (859)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (859)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (859)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)


</TABLE>
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 486 

Congratulating the Minnesota Lynx women’s basketball team on winning 

the 2015 Women’s National Basketball Association Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 22, 2015 

Mr. ELLISON (for himself, Mr. EMMER of Minnesota, Mr. KLINE, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. NOLAN, Mr. PAULSEN, Mr. PETERSON, and Mr. WALZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Minnesota Lynx women’s basketball team 

on winning the 2015 Women’s National Basketball Association Championship. 

Whereas, on October 14, 2015, the Minnesota Lynx won the 

2015 Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA); 

Whereas this is the third national championship for the Minnesota Lynx in 5 years; 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx beat the Los Angeles Sparks 

with only one loss in the semifinals, swept the Phoenix 

Mercury in the Western Conference Finals and decisively 

beat the Indian Fever in the first fifth-game final since 

2009; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 486 IH 

Whereas a franchise record 18,933 fans attended the championship game at the Target Center in Minneapolis to 

cheer on the Minnesota Lynx; 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx benefit from stellar leadership 

from Head Coach Cheryl Reeve and Assistant Coaches 

Jim Petersen and Shelley Patterson, feature 5 world 

champion and gold medal athletes, Lindsay Whalen, 

Maya Moore, Seimone Augustus, Asjha Jones, and Finals 

MVP Sylvia Fowles as well as highly talented professionals including Rebekkah Brunson, Renee Montgomery, 

Anna Cruz, Shae Kelley, Tricia Liston, Devereaux 

Peters, and Kalana Greene; and 

Whereas the Minnesota Lynx are one of only four WNBA 

teams to win more than 2 championships, and all 3 

under the coaching of Cheryl Reeve: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

3 coaches, fans, and staff whose dedication has helped 

4 the Minnesota Lynx win the 2015 Women’s National 

5 Basketeball Association Championship; and 

6 (2) recognizes the Twin Cities area and Min7 nesota for the enthusiastic support of women’s pro8 fessional basketball. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
\
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                                           PLACE OF INCORPORATION
------------------                                                           ----------------------
<S>                                                                          <C>
AMTROL Canada Ltd.                                                           Ontario, Canada

Water Soft Inc.                                                              Rhode Island

AMTROL International Investments Inc.                                        Rhode Island

AMTROL Europe Ltd.                                                           United Kingdom

AMTROL Holdings Netherlands B.V.                                             Netherlands

AMTROL Holding GmbH                                                          Donaueschingen, Germany

AMTROL Wassererwarmer Beteiligungs GmbH                                      Donaueschingen, Germany

Nova Emaillertechnik GmbH                                                    Donaueschingen, Germany

AMTROL NOVA GmbH & Co. K.G.                                                  Donaueschingen, Germany

AMTROL Poland Sp z.o.o.                                                      Swarzedz, Poland

AMTROL Holdings Portugal, SGPS, Unipessoal, Lda.                             Guimaraes, Portugal

AMTROL-ALFA Metalomecanica, S.A.                                             Guimaraes, Portugal

AMTROL Asia Pacific Ltd.                                                     Hong Kong
</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:  May 9, 2003                               /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                                 Title: President and Treasurer

                                                  A  signed   original  of  this
                                                  written statement  required by
                                                  Section 906 has been  provided
                                                  to CNL  Income  Fund XI,  Ltd.
                                                  and  will be  retained  by CNL
                                                  Income  Fund  XI,   Ltd.   and
                                                  furnished  to  the  Securities
                                                  and Exchange Commission or its
                                                  staff upon request.