alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.2



                            3333 HOLDING CORPORATION

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


         THE UNDERSIGNED hereby constitutes and appoints J. Stephen Bilheimer,
with full power of substitution in the premises, as the undersigned's true and
lawful agent and attorney-in-fact (the "Attorney-in-Fact"), with full power and
authority in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in his capacity as a
Director of 3333 Holding Corporation (the "Company"), to execute and file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the Company's fiscal year ended March 31, 1997, together with any and all
amendments thereto.

         This Power of Attorney and all authority granted and conferred hereby
shall continue indefinitely and, unless waived by the Attorney-in-Fact, may not
be revoked until the Attorney-in-Fact has received five days' written notice of
such revocation.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of
Attorney this 24th day of June, 1997.




                                                  /s/ Josiah O. Low, III
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Josiah O. Low, III
                                             Director
                                             3333 Holding Corporation



<PAGE>   2




                            3333 HOLDING CORPORATION

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


         THE UNDERSIGNED hereby constitutes and appoints J. Stephen Bilheimer,
with full power of substitution in the premises, as the undersigned's true and
lawful agent and attorney-in-fact (the "Attorney-in-Fact"), with full power and
authority in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in his capacity as a
Director of 3333 Holding Corporation (the "Company"), to execute and file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the Company's fiscal year ended March 31, 1997, together with any and all
amendments thereto.

         This Power of Attorney and all authority granted and conferred hereby
shall continue indefinitely and, unless waived by the Attorney-in-Fact, may not
be revoked until the Attorney-in-Fact has received five days' written notice of
such revocation.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of
Attorney this 26th day of June, 1997.




                                                  /s/ David M. Sherer
                                               ------------------------------
                                               David M. Sherer
                                               Director
                                               3333 Holding Corporation
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusBuildings & Grounds
Supreme Court Buildings
        
    
      Supreme Court Building

A fitting home for the nation's third branch of government. Originally meeting inside the U.S. Capitol, the Supreme Court moved to its own building just across the street in 1935.

learn more
          Thurgood Marshall Building

Houses agencies that support the work of the United States Federal Courts including the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, the Federal Judicial Center, and the United States Sentencing Commission.

learn more

    
      Image
    View of the Old Supreme Court Chamber in the U.S. Capitol.

Inside the U.S. Capitol

Old Supreme Court Chamber

The was the first room constructed for the use of the nation's highest judiciary body and was used by the Court from 1810 until 1860.

More Details Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 7, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 1, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, USPS Ground Advantage®, and Parcel Select Contract 1 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-93, CP2024-95.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-26838 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

NVAP Coordinators

Last Modified: 

Print

Find Your Local NVAP Coordinator

Select your State or Territory from the dropdown menu to view contact information

for the local NVAP coordinator. To learn more, visit More Information About NVAP.

- Select a State - ▾

Loading...

NVAP Coordinators Contacts
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- Fluor Enterprises, Inc. Under Contract No. FA8903-06-D-8512 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59134

Donald M. Yenovkian II, Esq.

Senior Counsel John S. Pachter, Esq. Kathryn T. Muldoon, Esq. Daniel Q. Homer, Esq.

Smith Pachter McWhorter PLC Vienna, VA John L. Cammack, Esq.

Michael & Cammack Stockton, CA Col Matthew J. Mulbarger, USAF

Air Force ChiefTrial Attorney Sarah L. Stanton, Esq.

Senior Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL Following a successful mediation at the Board, the parties have settled their dispute. The Board grants the parties'jointrequest dated 29 January 2016, and dismisses this appeal with prejudice. Dated: 2 February 2016

# cA~ REBAPAGE

# ~ Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
20615

#### Poe v. Hawai'i Labor Relations Bd.

Affirmed
EXHIBIT  99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFG Investment Trust D (the "Trust"),
on  Form  10-Q  for  the  period  ended  September  30,  2002  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  the  Principal  Executive Officer of the Trust's Managing Trustee,
hereby  certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:
(1)     the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and
(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of the Trust.

                    /s/  Gary  D.  Engle
                    --------------------
                    Gary  D.  Engle
President  of  AFG  ASIT  Corporation,
 the  Managing  Trustee  of  the  Trust
(Principal  Executive  Officer)
                    November  19,  2002
Exhibit 32.3

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OFUNION ELECTRIC COMPANY(required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of Union Electric Company (the
Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Gary L. Rainwater, chief executive officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Form
10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of           the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 9, 2004

| |  | /s/ Gary L. Rainwater
Gary L. RainwaterChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 60312 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JOHN PEDELAHORE , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 24

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * John Pedelahore appeals the 10

- year term of supervised release imposed by the district court following its revocation of his prior five

- year term of supervised release . Pedelahore was convict ed of using the Internet to coerce and entice a minor for illegal sexual activity. He argues that his supervised release term i s substantively unreasonable because the district court failed to account for a factor that should have received significant weight , and the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 25, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-60312 Document: 00513395907 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/25/2016No. 15

- 60312

2 sentence represented a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors. We review a preserved challenge to revocation sentence s under the plainly unr easonable standard. United States v. Miller , 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir. 2011 ). In imposing sentence, the district court considered the advisory policy statements and the appropriate sentencing factors. The district court also considered the testimony of Dr. Richard Strebeck who, among other things, testified that he was not able to quantify Pedelahore’s risk level and opined that Pedelahore required continued supervised release. The record shows that the district court did not ignore mitigating factors. Dr. Strebeck testified that Pedelahore received group counseling from him f or about one year, and an unspecified amount and type of counseling from a prior counselor. The district court heard this testimony and did not consider Pedelahore’s specific lack of

one - on - one counseling to be a mitigating factor. See United States v. A lvarado , 691 F.3d 592, 597 (5th Cir. 2012) (finding appellant’s mere belief that mitigating factors should have been balanced differently insufficient to disturb the presumption of reasonableness) . Finally, even though Pedelahore’s supervised release viol ations were only Grade C, he admitted to five separate violations. Pedelahore cites no authority for the proposition that a 10

- year term of supervised release is plainly unreasonable when imposed for multiple Grade C violations. Given the above, the dist rict court’s imposition of a 10

- year term of supervised release following revocation was not plainly unreasonable. See Miller , 634 F.3d at 843. AFFIRMED. Case: 15-60312 Document: 00513395907 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/25/2016
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/19 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
January 21, 2004

22937

#### State v. Bucar

Vacated and Remanded
#### State v. Pedro

23606

02/28/2002

Affirmed
May 14, 1999

21849

#### State v. Ung

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FORM 10-Q/A AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              264,819
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    38,484,453
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (3,161,346)
<INVENTORY>                                      40,595,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 93,683,835
<PP&E>                                           84,165,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (18,595,077)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  200,969,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           126,152,973
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            151,110
<OTHER-SE>                                       63,722,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    200,969,705
<SALES>                                          55,543,576
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 55,543,576
<CGS>                                            48,257,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    48,257,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 17,490,710
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,320,059
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,922,571)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4,628,135)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,294,436)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,294,436)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.48)


</TABLE>
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Revised Biotechnology Regulations

(Previously SECURE Rule)

Last Modified: 

Print

On May 18, 2020, APHIS published the first comprehensive revision of APHIS’

biotechnology regulations since they were established in 1987, with a phased

implementation through 2021. 

The revised rule differs from the previous regulatory framework by focusing on an

organism’s properties and not on the method used to produce it, enabling APHIS to

regulate modified organisms with greater precision and reducing regulatory burden

for developers. 

Biotechnology Regulations 7 CFR part 340

Key Changes

Exemptions and Confirmations

Under the revised regulations, certain categories of modified plants are exempt from

the regulations because they could otherwise have been developed through

conventional breeding techniques and thus are unlikely to pose an increased plant

pest risk compared to conventionally bred plants. Developers can request a

confirmation from APHIS that a modified plant qualifies for an exemption and is not
subject to the regulations in 7 CFR part 340.  

View Exemptions and Confirmations

Regulatory Status Reviews

Under the revised regulations, developers have the option of requesting a regulatory

status review of a plant developed using genetic engineering that has not been

previously evaluated and determined to be nonregulated. This process replaces the

petition process in the preexisting regulations. 

Learn More About Regulatory Status Reviews

Notification Process Retired

As part of the revised regulations, the former notification process was discontinued

on April 5, 2021. All applications to move organisms subject to the regulations must

now be submitted through the permitting process.

View Legacy Notification Process

Final Rule

Final Rule

View May 18, 2020, Federal Register Notice

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Record of Decision

Questions and Answers

Proposed Rule

As part of revising the biotechnology regulations, APHIS published a Proposed Rule

and a draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (pEIS) for public

comment. The draft Programmatic EIS evaluated the environmental impacts of

updating its regulations, as required by National Environmental Policy Act.

Programmatic EISs are often prepared for actions that typically involve the agency,

an entire program or a substantial program component. They are preceded by a

Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS.

Proposed Rule
DRAFT Environmental Impact Statement

EPA EIS Federal Register Notice 

Notice of Intent 

Public Comments

Previously, APHIS published proposed rules in 2008 and 2017 for potential changes

to the regulations. APHIS withdrew both rules in response to public comments and to

reengage in a fresh dialogue with stakeholders on the regulation of biotechnology.
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/09

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

★ ■

■ ■

■

★

●

●

★

● ●

●

●
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           390,289
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           11,884
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             12,038
<EQUITIES>                                      56,247
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 458,420
<CASH>                                          36,045
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 778,245
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             47,967
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 191,568
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 54,888
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,480
<OTHER-SE>                                     307,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   778,245
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,131,557
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             33,910
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  40,005
<BENEFITS>                                     906,781
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           257,458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,304
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,960
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,344
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>