alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply408Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Martin Shore (not verified)PermalinkApril 26, 2023 - 4:39pmWow- I guess I must have read this in 2013 but forgot. Anyway, I just read this article about places on the AOC campus to enjoy spring. Very nice article - thanks for resending this blog. I was quite pleased to see the Ford HOB represented on the map as a place to see cherry trees. It is true that Ford is often overlooked but this year, I think Capitol Grounds outdid themselves. The landscape around this building was just great this year! One other note about an honorable mention- the House Parks south of Longworth and Rayburn are also worth a visit. A pleasant place to spend time and plenty of seating. Thanks for the article!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
John Sevier Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Belle Kinney and Leopold F. Scholz

Materials
    Bronze

Year
    1931

Location
      
National Statuary Hall

This statue of John Sevier was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Tennessee in 1931.

John Sevier was born in Rockingham County, Virginia, on September 23, 1745. Searching for available land he could afford, he moved west in 1772 and served as a militia captain under George Washington in Lord Dunmore's War. A lieutenant colonel in the trans-Allegheny forces during the Revolution, he was commended for his services at Kings Mountain in 1780. Consequently, in March 1785 he was elected governor of the independent State of Franklin, a portion of North Carolina where settlers desired statehood. North Carolina declared the State of Franklin in revolt, subdued it with force, and ceded it to Congress. Subsequently, Sevier was elected to the North Carolina Senate in 1789, received a full pardon, and was restored to his status of brigadier general.

He retired to his plantation and was appointed trustee of Washington College and Blount College (now the University of Tennessee). Because of his military renown, he was elected the first governor of Tennessee (1796–1801 and 1803–1809), state senator (1809–1811), and a member of the U.S. House of Representatives in 1811. He died on September 24, 1815, while serving as commissioner to survey the boundary between Georgia and the land of the Creek Indians in Alabama. His remains were later reinterred in Knoxville, Tennessee. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 7, 2012

h1031

Order 

November 7, 2012

145328

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145328

COA: 308946 

Saginaw CC: 09-032840-FH

LAWRENCE R. J. BUCKNER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 29, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:  August 8, 2003                      /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                           Title: President and Treasurer

                                           A  signed  original  of this  written
                                           statement required by Section 906 has
                                           been  provided to CNL Income Fund XI,
                                           Ltd.  and  will  be  retained  by CNL
                                           Income Fund XI, Ltd. and furnished to
                                           the     Securities    and    Exchange
                                           Commission or its staff upon request.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Infectious Salmon Anemia (ISA)

Laboratories

Last Modified: 

Print

California
California Animal Health & Food Safety Laboratory

University of California

Phone: 530-752-8709

Mailing Address:

620 West Health Science Dr.

Davis, CA 95616

Testing Capabilities:

AMR, ASF, CSF, FMD, IAV-A, IAV-S, ISA, ND, PRV, VHS, VSV

Level 1 Lab

Colorado

Colorado State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory

Phone: 970-297-1281

Mailing Address:

2450 Gillette Dr.

Fort Collins, CO 80526

Testing Capabilities:

AMR, ASF, BSE, CSF, CWD, FMD, IAV-A, IAV-S, ISA, ND, PRV, Scrapie, VHS, VSV

Level 1 Lab
Florida

Bronson Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory

Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

Phone: 321-697-1400

Mailing Address:

2700 North John Young Pkwy.

Kissimmee, FL 34741

Testing Capabilities:

AMR, ASF, CSF, CWD, FMD, IAV-A, IAV-S, ISA, ND, PRV, Scrapie, SVC, VHS

Level 1 Lab

Ohio

Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory

Ohio Department of Agriculture

Phone: 614-728-6220

Mailing Address:

8995 East Main St., Bldg. 6

Reynoldsburg, OH 43068

Approved tests:
AMR, ASF, CSF, CWD, FMD, IAV-A, IAV-S, ISA, ND, PRV, Scrapie, SVC, VHS

Level 1 Lab

Washington

Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory - Pullman

Phone: 509-335-9696

Mailing Address:

1940 SE Olympia Ave.

Pullman, WA

Approved tests:

AMR, ASF, BSE, CSF, CWD, FMD, IAV-A, IAV-S, ISA, ND, PRV, Scrapie, SVC, VHS

Level 1 Lab

Infectious Salmon Anemia (ISA) Laboratories Contacts
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the filing by Applied Energetics, Inc. (the “company”) of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) I, Joseph C. Hayden, Principal Executive Officer of the company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(i)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company.




This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the principal executive officer of Applied Energetics, Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Applied Energetics, Inc. and will be retained by Applied Energetics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Joseph C. HaydenJoseph C. HaydenPresident and Principal Executive OfficerDate: May 10, 2011
1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-2598

___________ Courtney D. Yorke, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Vinnell Corporation, doing business * as Hubert H. Humphrey Job Corps, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 16, 2007 Filed: November 7, 2007

___________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Courtney D. Yorke appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Yorke’s arguments for reversal, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B; Wallace v. DTG Operations, Inc. , 442 F.3d 1112, 1117-18 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). We also deny Yorke’s pending motions.

______________________________
Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 W. Front St., Ste 354

Tyler, Texas 75702

RE: No. 12-14-00332-CV

Robert C. Morris vs. Sherri Milligan, Et Al

T/C No. 349-6270

Dear Court Clerk,

April 15, 2015

1LED IN COURT

12th Court of Ap ^X_

APK LU IS

TYLER TEXAS

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

Please find enclosed my Motion To Suspend Rules and my Appellant's Pro Se Brief

to be filed and presented to the Court for consideration and ruling int he above

styled numbered cause.

Please Note that on this day, a true and correct copy of the enclosed has been

served upon the Appellees through counsel, Asst. Attorney General Patrick Brezik.

I would request notification upon reciept of the enclosed and any ruling

entered by the Court in this matter.

Thank you for your time and assistance inthis matter, it is greatly appreciated

and welcomed.

Sincerely,

enclosure(s): 3

cc: file

Patrick Brezik,

Asst. Attorney General

Dms

Appellant Pro Se

TDCJ-ID # 1311083

Smith Unit

1313 CR 19

Lamesa, Texas 79331
NO. 12-14-00332-CV

ROBERT C- MORRIS IN THE

vs § TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

ED IN COURT*

SHERRI MILLIGAN, ET AL .

MOTION TO SUSPEND RULES

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Robert C. Morris, Appellant Pro Sel inttie afcve-Kfylpri'

cause, and respectfully files and submits this his Motion to Suspend Rules, purusant

to Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Morris shows cause in support to

suspend the following RulesMorris is presently incarcerated at the Smith Unit of TDCJ in Lamesa, texas. He

does not have access to photocopy machine, nor does TDCJ provide copies to inmates.

Furthermore, Morris has previously filed with this Court a Motion for Immediate Court

to direct Smith Unit TDCJ officials to provide necessary paper to prepare and file

appeal brief. A writ of mandamus was also sought from this Court for the same issue.

Therefore, due to the circumstances beyond Morris's control, he seeks to suspend

the following Rules of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Rule 9.3 - Number of Copies: the Rules requires original and one copy of the

document to be filed. Morris seeks to suspend Rule due to the lack

of access to photocopy machine or service.

Rule 9.4 - Form: Subsection (a) requires printing on one side of paper. Morris

seeks suspension of this Rule's subsection due to the Smith Unit

Law Library officials failure to provide necessary paper. TDCJ

officials limited number of sheets requested and provided, however

there is an unlimited access to pre-printed forms, which in order

to prepare and file appellate brief within deadline, Morris used

the unlimited access to forms .

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Appellant Robert C. Morris, prays this

Honorable Court grants the suspension of the Rules as requested in this motion due to

circumstances beyond Morris's control, in the interest of justice.

:fully Submitted

Dated: April 15, 2015

12gtt&Bgt,C'TEXAS

T. Morris

Appellant Pro Se

TDCJ-ID # 1311083

Smith Unit

1313 CR 19

Lamesa, Texas 79331

red
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Mark R.Tauscher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)  the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 11, 2005 | By:    |  /s/ Mark R. Tauscher     |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                       |   |  Mark R. Tauscher         |
|                       |   |  Chief Executive  Officer |

 

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, James G.Thomasch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)  the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 11, 2005 | By:    |  /s/ James G. Thomasch    |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                       |   |  James G. Thomasch        |
|                       |   |  Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


               Standard Management Corporation and its Subsidiaries


                               Organization Chart


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                            PERCENTAGE           STATE OR
                                                                OF              COUNTRY IN
         NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                OUTSTANDING             WHICH
<S>                                                        <C>                  <C>
Health Services:
    U.S. Health Services Corporation.......................    100%               Delaware
    HomeMed Channel, Inc. .................................    100%               Indiana
    PCA, LLC...............................................    100%               Indiana
    HomeDoc Corporation....................................    100%               Indiana
    Apothecary Solutions Corporation.......................    100%               Indiana

Financial Services:
    Standard Life Insurance Company of Indiana.............    100%               Indiana
    Dixie National Life Insurance company..................   99.5%               Indiana


Other Services:
    Standard Administrative Services, Inc. ................    100%               Indiana
    Savers Marketing Corporation...........................    100%            North Carolina
    Standard Marketing Corporation.........................    100%               Indiana
    Standard Management Financial Corporation..............    100%               Delaware
    Premier Life (Bermuda) Limited.........................    100%               Bermuda
</Table>
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Protecting Natural Resources

Last Modified: 

Print

WS partners with Federal and State agencies, municipalities, organizations, and

private landowners to protect natural resources including rare species, native

wildlife, and ecosystems.

Beaver Damage 

Invasive Species 

Starlings and Blackbirds 
Vultures 

Waterfowl 

Wildlife Rabies
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Max D. Friedman, as Executor of Irving Mendelson, Deceased Executor of Max Mendelson, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County,

June 19, 1959.

*846*Max Boss*for Ida Mendelson and another, object ants.

*Shorenstein <& Shorenstein*for Helen M. Frawley, individually and as natural and testamentary guardian of Sherry R Mendelson, and another, infants, objectant.

*Nathaniel H. Mandelher*for Max Friedman, as executor of the deceased executor, Irving Mendelson.

*Paul Wolfe,*as special guardian for Sherry R Mendelson and another, infants.

Christopher C. McGrath, S.

In this proceeding brought by the executor of the deceased executor to judicially settle the the account of the decedent, a person named as a legatee in the will of the deceased executor, has filed objections “ individually and as natural and testamentary guardian ’ ’ of infants who are remaindermen of the trust created by the testator herein. A motion has been made to strike out such objections.

The objectant individually is not a person interested in this estate within the meaning of the statutes (Surrogates Ct. Act, §§ 257, 262). Her interest appears to be that of a person named as a legatee in the deceased executor’s will. Nothing in the Surrogate’s Court Act authorizes the appearance and the filing of objections by such a person *(Matter of Croker,*144 Misc. 492).

While it is true that actions or proceedings with reference to the estate of a decedent can only be maintained by the executor or the administrator as the case may be, in some circumstances, remedies may be pursued by the legatee or distributee on behalf of the estate *(Noll*v. *Smith,*250 App. Div. 453; *Peller*v. *Katz,*15 Misc 2d 1093, 1094).

An analysis of the objections and the affidavits opposing the motion discloses that the major portion of the issues raised are clearly without substance in view of the tax schedules filed by the deceased executor. However, the objectant does seem to contend that the stock interest of the testator which is set forth in Schedule A of the account filed herein, has been liquidated and that substantial sums of money have been paid by the deceased executor to the life tenant and the adult contingent *847remaindermen in liquidation of said stock interest. No claim or credit for such payments or advances has been asserted in the account filed herein.

In view of this circumstance and in order to make a full, equitable and complete disposition of the issue presented, the court in its discretion will permit the objectant to intervene for the sole purpose of presenting this question which, if successful, may serve to mitigate any possible liability.

Her purported appearance as ‘ ‘ natural and testamentary guardian ’ ’ for the infants is ineffective by reason of her failure to comply with rule VI of the Buies of the Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County. Furthermore, a special guardian has heretofore been appointed to protect the interests of such infants.

The motion to strike out the objectant’s notice of appearance and objections is granted except to the extent herein indicated.

Settle order.
#### Dep’t of Human Services v. Goo

19309

9/18/96

Affirmed