alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MICHAEL P. PATTON

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 324 , 20 2 4

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. N86015075DI

§

§

Submitted: September 4 , 20 2 4

Decided: September 12 , 20 2 4

ORDER

On July 10, 2024, the Superior Court sentenced the appellant, Michael P.

Patton, for a violation of probation. This Court received Patton’s notice of appeal

from the Superior Court’s decision on August 12, 2024. The Senior Court Clerk

issued, by certified mail, a notice directing Patton to show cause why his appeal

should not be dismissed as untimely filed. 1 The notice instructed Patton to respond

within ten days and advised that if he did not respond, dismissal of the appeal would

be deemed to be unopposed. On August 22 , 202 4 , the Court received the certified

mail receipt indicating that the notice had been delivered. The appellant having

1 D EL

. S UPR

. C T

. R. 6.2

failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten

- day period,

dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11 (Unaudited)

COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         BASIC                         DILUTED
                                                  Three Months Ended             Three Months Ended
                                                     September 30,                  September 30,
                                              --------------------------     --------------------------
                                                  1999           1998            1999           1998
                                              -----------    -----------     -----------    -----------
<S>                                           <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>
Net income (loss)                                 605,328    $  (279,647)        605,328    $  (279,647)
                                              =========================================================

Weighted average common
shares outstanding                              5,957,470      5,767,700       5,957,470      5,767,700
                                              ===========    ===========

Weighted average common share equivalents:
    Options and warrants                               --             --         776,670             --
                                                                             -----------    -----------

Weighted average common
    shares and common share
    equivalents                                 5,957,470      5,767,700       6,734,140      5,767,700
                                              =========================================================

Net income (loss)  per share                  $       .10    $      (.05)    $       .09    $      (.05)
                                              ===========    ===========     ===========    ===========
</TABLE>


                                       14
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Anthony Calzaretta, Defendant.

County Court, Kings County,

April 23, 1959.

*Edward S. Silver, District Attorney (William*I. *Siegel*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*Anthony Calzaretta,*defendant in person.

Hyman Barshay, J.

This, is an application in the nature of a writ of error *coram nobis*to vacate and set aside a judgment dated July 28, 1958, convicting the defendant, on his own plea of gmilty, of the crime of conspiracy to commit extortion and sentencing him to the New York City Penitentiary, the sentence to run concurrently with one he was then serving in the same penitentiary, for the crime of assault in the third degree.

At the time of sentence the court stated that the defendant was “ the least culpable ” of his codefendants, who received lesser sentences. He now contends that he was denied due process and equal protection of the law in violation of the State and Federal Constitutions because the court had imposed a longer term of imprisonment upon him than his codefendants and that the court improperly placed him in a “ separate classification.” After he pleaded guilty, a full and complete *2probation report was submitted to the court and based upon it the defendant was sentenced as above stated. The court’s statement that he was ‘ ‘ the least culpable ’ ’ indicated that the defendant was “ reformable ” and thus subject to an indeterminate penitentiary sentence *(People*v. *Gross,*5 N Y 2d 131). Assuming his contention was right (which it is not), he had an adequate remedy at law by appeal.

The application for a writ of error *coram nobis*is, therefore, denied. Let the District Attorney submit an order to that effect and serve a copy of it, when signed, on the defendant together with notice of entry thereof, by mail, at the institution where he is presently confined.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5 
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 1999
Broadway Associates Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                       8,580,000     
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  413,000 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  (123,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     0
<PP&E>                                                      41,346,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                             (12,204,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              40,830,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                0
<BONDS>                                                     28,135,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  11,209,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                40,830,000
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             5,281,000
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                5,751,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           2,909,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (3,858,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (3,858,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (3,858,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (8,302.17)    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (8,302.17)    

<FN>
<F1> Includes $139,000 of other assets.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of MISONIX, INC. (the "Company") on
FORM  10-Q  for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Michael A.
McManus,  Jr.,  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

          (1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

          (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of
               operations  of  the  Company.

/s/ Michael A. McManus, Jr.
---------------------------
Michael A. McManus, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 6, 2004






A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to MISONIX, INC. and will be retained
by  MISONIX, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff  upon  request.


<PAGE>
22778

#### Sherwood v. Administrative Director of Court, State of Hawai’i

Vacated and Remanded
#### Doe, In re

22304

08/16/2001

Vacated and Remanded
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                          ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                          MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC.


     Pursuant to the  applicable  provisions of Chapter 78 of the Nevada Revised
Statutes, Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. (the "Corporation") adopts the following
amendment to its Articles of Incorporation by stating the following:

     First:  That the Board of  Directors of the  Corporation  at a meeting duly
convened  and  held on the 17th  day of  December  2001,  adopted  a  resolution
declaring  that the  following  amendment  to the Articles of  Incorporation  is
advisable:

     The first paragraph of subparagraph "(A) - Common Stock" of "Article IV -
     Stock" is hereby deleted and the following is substituted therefor:

     "The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation  shall have authority
     to issue is 200,000,000 at a par value of $.002 per share. All stock when
     issued shall be fully paid and non-assessable."

     Second: That the number of shares of the Corporation entitled to vote on an
amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is 37,943,746, and that the foregoing
amendment  has  been  consented  to  and  approved  by a  majority  vote  of the
stockholders  holding at least a majority of each class of stock outstanding and
entitled to vote thereon.

Dated: March 13, 2002

MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES, INC.


By: /s/ Morgan F. Johnston
----------------------------------
   Morgan F. Johnston, Vice President
   General Counsel and Secretary
PD. No__-____ 

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

 

HENRY WILSON RICHARDS, JR., 

Appellant 

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee 

 

Seeking discretionary review of an opinion of the Court of Appeals for 

the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas, Texas 

in Cause No. 05-14-00075-CR

 

STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS: 

COMES NOW, The State of Texas, pursuant to Tex.R. App. P. 

68.2(c) requesting an extension of time to file its Petition for 

Discretionary Review in the above-numbered and styled cause. In 

support thereof, the undersigned attorney representing the State 

would show the following: 

PD-0731-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 6/15/2015 4:56:38 PM

Accepted 6/18/2015 10:18:46 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
On May 20, 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of 

Texas at Dallas, Texas delivered an opinion reversing the judgment 

of the trial court in the above-numbered and styled cause. 

Presently, the State’s Petition for Discretionary Review is due to be 

filed in this Honorable Court on or before June 19, 2015. However, 

due to a caseload which includes three other cases in which the 

State’s brief is due to be filed in less than the next two weeks, the 

petition in the present case cannot be prepared for filing by the 

present due date. Therefore, the undersigned attorney requests a 

new filing date 30 days past the present due date of June 19, or 

until July 19, 2015, which is a Sunday, making July 20, 2015 the 

date to file the petition. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true copies of the foregoing motion were 

served on Ms. Lisa McMinn, the State’s Prosecuting Attorney, and 

Michael Mowla, attorney for Appellant, by eFileTexas.gov and 

United States mail on June 15, 2015. 

/s/Patricia Poppoff Noble

PATRICIA POPPOFF NOBLE
November 21, 2007

27810

#### Bonty v. State

Affirmed
**Exhibit 31.1**
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Robert M. Goodfriend, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer ofGoody’s Family Clothing, Inc., certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Goody’s FamilyClothing, Inc. (the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting         By:       /s/ ROBERT M. GOODFRIEND    Robert M. Goodfriend    *Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer*   
August 19, 2004
18
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 498 

Expressing support for designation of October 2015 as ‘‘National Breast 

Cancer Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 27, 2015 

Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mrs. DINGELL) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of October 2015 as 

‘‘National Breast Cancer Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas breast cancer is the most common cancer among 

women worldwide; 

Whereas 1 in 8 women in the United States will be diagnosed 

with breast cancer in her lifetime; 

Whereas breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer 

death among women in the United States; 

Whereas each year it is estimated that over 230,000 women 

in the United States will be diagnosed with breast cancer 

and more than 40,000 will die; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 498 IH 

Whereas an estimated 2,300 men will be diagnosed with 

breast cancer in the United States and more than 400 

will die each year; 

Whereas in recent years, there has been a gradual reduction 

in female breast cancer incidence rates among women 

aged 50 and older; 

Whereas death rates from breast cancer have been declining 

since about 1990, due in part to better screening and 

early detection, increased awareness, and continually improving treatment options; and 

Whereas October 2015 would be an appropriate month to 

designate as ‘‘National Breast Cancer Awareness 

Month’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National 

3 Breast Cancer Awareness Month’’ and the goals and 

4 ideals of that month; and 

5 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

6 to observe the month with appropriate awareness 

7 and educational activities, and take steps to reduce 

8 their risk of breast cancer, including maintaining a 

9 healthy weight, exercising, limiting alcohol intake 

10 and menopausal hormones, and breastfeeding, if 

11 they can. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
153 P.3d 476

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

March 9, 2007

27504

#### Abejon v. State

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 21
     
                        Subsidiaries of the Company
                   and State of Incorporation or Formation
     
     
     
     
     CV Warehouse 75, Inc.                        Florida
     CV Warehouse 76, Inc.                        Florida
     CV Warehouse 78, Inc.                        Florida
     W.X. Properties, Inc.                        Florida
     D.X. Properties, Inc.                        Florida
     GRX Corp.                                    Florida
     Montgomery CV Realty Trust                   Delaware
     Montgomery CV Realty L.P.                    Delaware
     Recreation Mortgages L.P.                    Delaware
     Recreation Mortgages LLC                     Delaware
     Drexel Realty, Inc.                          Pennsylvania
     Royce Realty, Inc.                           Pennsylvania
     MGA Payroll Company, Inc.                    Pennsylvania
     Rio Grande Associates, L.P.                  Pennsylvania 
     Rio Grande Associates LLC                    Delaware
     Danville Plaza Associates, L.P.              Delaware
     Danville Plaza LLC                           Delaware
     Woodbourne Square Associates, L.P.           Delaware
     Woodbourne Square LLC                        Delaware
     Chesterbrook Village Center Associates, L.P. Delaware
     Chesterbrook Village Center LLC              Delaware
     Mount Carmel Plaza Associates, L.P.          Delaware
     Mount Carmel Plaza LLC                       Delaware
     Glenmont Associates, L.P.                    Pennsylvania
     Glenmont LLC                                 Delaware
     Plymouth Plaza Associates, L.P.              Delaware
     Plymouth Plaza LLC                           Delaware
     County Line Plaza Realty Associates, L.P.    Delaware
     County Line Plaza Realty, LLC                Delaware
     555 Scott Street Associates, L.P.            Delaware
     555 Scott Street LLC                         Delaware
     Route 6 Office Max Center Associates, L.P.   Delaware
     Route 6 Office Max Center LLC                Delaware
     Century Plaza Associates, L.P.               Delaware
     CP General Partner, LLC                      Delaware
     Collegeville Plaza Associates, L.P.          Delaware
     Collegeville Plaza, LLC                      Delaware
     Gilbertsville Plaza Associates, L.P.         Delaware
     Gilbertsville Plaza, LLC                     Delaware
     Marlton Plaza Associates, L.P.               Delaware
     Marlton Plaza, LLC                           Delaware
     Marlton Plaza Associates II, L.P.            Delaware
     Marlton Plaza II, LLC                        Delaware
     New Holland Plaza Associates, L.P.           Delaware
     New Holland Plaza, LLC                       Delaware
     Newtown Village Plaza Associates, L.P.       Delaware
     Newtown Village Plaza, LLC                   Delaware
     North Penn Marketplace Associates, L.P.      Delaware
     North Penn Marketplace, LLC                  Delaware
United States Department of Agriculture 

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

WS Directive 2.115 07/21/08

NATIONAL WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER

1. PURPOSE 

To state the responsibilities and duties of the National Wildlife Research Center 

(NWRC). 

2. REPLACEMENT HIGHLIGHTS 

This directive revises WS Directive 2.115 dated 08/27/03. 

3. BACKGROUND 

The NWRC is the research and scientific arm of the Wildlife Services (WS) program and 

has a worldwide reputation as a center of excellence in research and methods 

development for wildlife damage management. The NWRC scientific staff consists of 

experts in animal behavior, chemistry, ecology, wildlife genetics, molecular biology, 

toxicology, wildlife biology, wildlife diseases, pharmacology, physiology, economics, 

statistics, library science, and other specialties. A cadre of professional research 

managers, administrative, and office business process specialists complete NWRC 

staffing. The work force is located in Fort Collins, Colorado, and at several research 

field stations throughout the United States. The NWRC staff has extensive experience in 

conducting international consultancies and wildlife damage research projects in other 

countries, as part of cooperative research efforts among the USDA, host nations and 

international donor organizations. 

4. MISSION STATEMENT 

The mission of the NWRC is to apply scientific expertise to resolve human-wildlife 

conflicts while maintaining the quality of the environment shared with wildlife. NWRC 

develops methods and information to address human-wildlife conflicts related to the 

following: agriculture (crops, livestock, aquaculture, and timber), human health and 

safety (wildlife disease, aviation), property damage, invasive species, and threatened and 

endangered species. 

5. POLICY 

NWRC is responsible for the discovery, development, and improvement of techniques 

and information to resolve human-wildlife conflicts with focus on agricultural damage 

problems and risks to human health and safety. NWRC developed methods must be 
effective, biologically sound, and socially acceptable. Wildlife damage and 

environmental assessments, as well as studies of wildlife biology, disease, ecology, and 

behavior are common components of NWRC research. Also, studies are conducted for 

registration of chemical management agents through the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Food and Drug Administration, and other Federal, State, and local agencies. 

Deputy Administrator
#### State v. Hoyle

18013

5/24/96

Affirmed, Reversed in part and Remanded