alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply633Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Karl Baumann (... (not verified)PermalinkMarch 25, 2020 - 12:19pmIt‚Äôs always interesting to see how other specialty trades perform their work.  Metal roofing is a unique trade all by itself. Great work!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

                    CHATTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
          STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
          FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1995, 1994 AND 1993
                (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                  1995       1994       1993
                                                ------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>        <C>       <C>
NET INCOME (LOSS):
Continuing operations ........................  $ 2,325    $ 2,110   $(1,100)
Discontinued operations ......................   10,008      1,500     2,379
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment
  of debt, net ...............................     (367)    (1,556)     (480)
Cumulative effect of accounting change,
  net ........................................       --         --       569
                                                --------   --------  --------
     Net income ..............................  $11,966    $ 2,054   $ 1,368
                                                ========   ========  ========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON AND
  COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING:
  Weighted number of common shares
    outstanding ..............................    7,292      7,292     6,303
  Shares issued upon assumed exercise
    of outstanding stock options .............       --         --        38
                                                --------   --------  --------
  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding .....    7,292      7,292     6,341
                                                ========   ========  ========

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
  Continuing operations ......................  $   .32    $   .29   $  (.17)
  Discontinued operations ....................     1.37        .21       .38
  Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment
    of debt, net .............................     (.05)      (.21)     (.08)
  Cumulative effect of accounting change,
    net ......................................       --         --       .09
                                                --------   --------  --------
        Net income per common share...........  $  1.64    $   .29   $   .22
                                                ========   ========  ========
</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-12-00205-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

RAUL LONGORIA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 319th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Raul Longoria, attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated 

robbery. The trial court has certified that this Ais a plea-bargain case, and the defendant 

has NO right of appeal.@ See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

On March 28, 2012, this Court notified appellant=s counsel of the trial court=s 

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether 

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings 

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the 

existence of any amended certification.

On April 18, 2012, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel=s response 

does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that 

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be 

dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of 

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this 

appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed 

26th day of April, 2012.
#### Leona Ross, Plaintiff, and Alan Ross, Respondent, *v.*Air Farms, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 5, 1959.

*Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston (John J. Martin*of counsel), for appellants.

*Joseph Tiefenbrun*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff conceded that the safe landing of an aircraft is the sole responsibility of the pilot. Here, plaintiff failed to call anyone to check ground cover conditions at the airport on the day of the accident and neglected to obtain information which was available to him. The Liberty Weather Station recorded and reported approximately 13 inches of snow. The Airman’s Guide indicated that the airport was attended in the Summer only. Consequently plaintiff, making the landing on the basis of his own best judgment and plowing into approximately 13 inches of snow was guilty of contributory negligence and was not entitled to recover the damages caused *152to his aircraft. Therefore the award in favor of plaintiff may not be permitted to stand and the judgment should he reversed.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 cogts, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FORM 10-Q/A-1 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1,484,538
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    46,897,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (555,963)
<INVENTORY>                                      49,554,494
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                114,025,692
<PP&E>                                           76,536,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (15,905,888)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  209,173,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           107,128,353
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            147,614
<OTHER-SE>                                       67,984,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    209,173,769
<SALES>                                          72,324,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 72,324,728
<CGS>                                            57,458,031
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    57,458,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 10,493,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,995,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3,544,653
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,411,518
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2,133,135
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2,133,135
<EPS-BASIC>                                             .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .14


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

LASERSIGHT INCORPORATED

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of LaserSight Incorporated (the Company) does hereby certify that:

| | 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the   Company for quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with   the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.                                                                                               

|                    |                          
|------------------- | -------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2006 | /s/ Danghui (David) Liu
|                    |                          
|                    | Danghui (David) Liu    
|                    | Chief   Executive Officer

The certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 1350, has been provided to LaserSight Incorporated and will be retained LaserSight Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Joan E. Prior et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Peter Murray et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Queens County,

May 11, 1959.

*506
      *Stanley*7). *Hicks*for defendants.

*Patrick J. Beary*for plaintiffs.

Samuel Rabin, J.

This motion is to vacate the plaintiffs’ statement of readiness and strike the action from the calendar on the grounds that there have been no physical examination of the plaintiffs and no settlement discussions. The plaintiffs’ cross motion is to strike the cause from the Jury Calendar and place it upon the Non jury Calendar on the ground that the demand for a jury trial had imprinted thereon the name of a different attorney than the one who had appeared and answered for the defendants, and plaintiffs’ attorney had received no notice of any substitution of attorneys.

The action was commenced on February 13, 1957, and issue joined on April 23, 1957. I am of the opinion that the defendants had a reasonable opportunity to complete all the allowable preliminary proceedings and that the plaintiffs have shown both a willingness and attempts to discuss settlement sufficient to comply with the requirements of the applicable rule. Accordingly, the motion to vacate the statement of readiness and strike the cause from the calendar is denied.

The defendants’ attorney represents two insurance carriers and their insureds in approximately 3,000 actions and proceedings in the City of New York and surrounding counties. On September 27, 1958, in Special Term, Part II, of the Supreme Court, New York County, by an ex parte order, he was substituted in the place of Frederick Mellor in all pending actions and proceedings in which Frederick Mellor represented said carriers or their policyholders. This action was among those pending.

The contention of the plaintiffs is that the order above referred to was ineffectual to substitute attorneys in the instant action. In *Matter of Preferred Acc. Ins. Co.*v. *Roesch*(273 App. Div. 993) the court held that holders of automobile casualty policies “ impliedly authorized the insurance companies to act as their agents in obtaining a lawyer or lawyers for them as attorney or attorneys of record in the litigations”; that such implied authority included the power to change lawyers and in absence of revocation of authority, insurers could maintain legal proceedings for removal and substitution of attorneys without additional specific consent of policyholders. The court also, upon reargument, modified the original order so as to make the substitution applicable to actions pending in all courts, including courts other than the Supreme Court, New York County. Mr. Justice Shientag dissented solely because of his belief that the order slrouid contain a provision requiring that a copy of the *507order of substitution be sent by mail within a specified time to all of the insureds. It is apparent that this was rejected by the majority.

I am of the opinion that the above decision is determinative of the present motion. Plaintiffs’ motion to strike the cause from the J ury Calendar is denied.

Submit order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTIANS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM PART 1 OF FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,005,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,951,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 12,026,767
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,591,886
<PP&E>                                      18,819,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,159,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,403,867
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,641
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,928,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,159,565
<SALES>                                     38,588,147
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,588,147
<CGS>                                       28,785,024
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,540,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             884,641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,278,164
<INCOME-TAX>                                   934,391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,343,773
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,343,773
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000879555
<NAME> BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND III L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             142,007,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               142,007,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,067
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,197,803)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,157,736)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd. at September  30, 2000,  and its  statement of
income  for the nine  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd. for the nine months ended
September 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,792,981
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                   72,169
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         24,611,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,336,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 35,335,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     33,540,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   35,335,965
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,600,508
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  667,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,065,891
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,065,891
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,065,891
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund  XI,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.</FN>




</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on Form S-3 (Nos.  333-39400,  333-81774,  333-89970,  333-89970-01,
333-89970-02  and 333-11283) and the  Registration  Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-43737,   333-50793,   333-72156,   333-103818  and   333-101506)  of  Ameren
Corporation  of our reports  dated  February 12, 2004  relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
---------------------------------
    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
March 9, 2004
Exhibit 10.1





CLS HOLDINGS USA, INC.







July 24, 2018

















Star Associates, LLC


115 Kane Avenue


Middletown, RI  02842


Attn:  Andrew Glashow












Re: Financing and Acquisition of Oasis Cannabis by CLS Holdings, USA, Inc. (“CLS”)







Dear Andrew,







We did it!  We closed on the acquisition of the Oasis Cannabis companies, a feat we could not have accomplished without your dedication, unwaivering belief in the transaction and incredibly hard work over the last year to not only negotiate the transaction with me but also to secure the financing necessary to get the deal done.  In recognition of your extraordinary efforts as a member of our Board, the Board has determined to award Star Associates, LLC, your consulting company, a cash payment of $250,000, half of which has already been paid to you, and to issue Star Associates, LLC 700,000 shares of restricted CLS common stock.







I look forward to your continued active involvement in developing the future of CLS.







Best regards,







/s/ Jeffrey I. Binder







Jeffrey I. Binder


Chairman and CEO
#### Pase Motors, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Edgar Lawton, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

March 12, 1959.

*Paige & Berg (Irving M. Berg*of counsel), for appellant.

*Edgar Lawton,*respondent in person.

*Per Curiam.*

The defendant failed to submit a proper affidavit touching upon the merits of his defense to the action. *(Wasserman*v. *Tortora,*15 Mise 2d 1000.)

The order should be unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied, without prejudice to a renewal on proper papers.

Concur — Pette, Di Gtovanna and Benjamin, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.