alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
生物安全審核檢查清單

如果您加入了《國家禽類改良計劃》(National Poultry Improvement Plan,縮寫爲NPIP)、並滿足一定

的禽群規模要求、且希望在高致病性禽流感襲擊您的禽群時,能夠有資格獲得最高賠償,則您需要

完成定期的生物安全審核。與您的NPIP官方州級代理人進行的這些書面審核,可確保您已制定並實

施了可靠的生物安全計劃。

儘管其他禽群不要求審核,但美國農業部(USDA)鼓勵所有家禽生產者遵循NPIP的生物安全性指

南。這是减少禽群染病風險的最佳方法之一。

檢查背面的清單,瞭解有助於保持您禽群

健康的提示。 √

如果您看到疾病跡象,請立即採取行動! 電話號碼

獸醫

合作推廣辦事處(Cooperative Extension Office)

州獸醫/動物或家禽診斷實驗室

USDA 866.536.7593

動物與植物健康檢驗服務(Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service)

報告病禽
生物安全審核:期望內容

USDA是平等機會提供者、雇主和出借者。

動物與植物健康檢驗服務(Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service)

項目援助編號2235-15ZH-TW | 2020年2月簽發

如果您加入了NPIP且基於您的禽群規模有資格獲得審核,以下概述爲您在審核期間可期望的內容。

√

生物安全審核是基於書面的審核。將您的生物安全

計劃和所有相關文檔保存在便於您和/或審核人員查

看的地方。NPIP官方州級代理人將決定是親自(帶有

記錄)還是以電子方式完成審核。

審核人員將會查看生物安全計劃、培訓材料、正在執

行NPIP原則的文檔、所採取的任何糾正措施的記錄

以及生物安全協調員的年度審查結果。

至少每2年進行一次審核,或是其間有足夠的次數

NPIP官方州級代理人確定合規。

如需瞭解更多關於如何保持禽群健康的信息,請關註Facebook和Twitter上的保護禽群

(Defend the Flock),並訪問 www.aphis.usda.gov/animalhealth/defendtheflock。

如果您未通過初始審核,則可以請求進行“檢查審核

(check audit)”。該現場審核將由包括美國農業部家禽專

家、NPIP官方州級代理人以及熟悉您的業態的獲得執照和

認可的家禽獸醫組成的團隊進行。

完成檢查審核,並表明您已經採取糾正措施後,您將會被恢

復爲符合NPIP生物安全原則。
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  March 31, 2004 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


Date:  May 12, 2004                      /s/ Robert A.  Bourne
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: Robert A. Bourne
                                         Title: President and Treasurer

                                         A  signed   original  of  this  written
                                         statement  required  by Section 906 has
                                         been  provided  to CNL Income Fund XII,
                                         Ltd. and will be retained by CNL Income
                                         Fund XII,  Ltd.  and  furnished  to the
                                         Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
                                         its staff upon request.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Fruit Fly Federal Orders, SPRO

Letters & Environmental Documents

Last Modified: 

Print

This page provides a collection of resources, including State plant regulatory official

(SPRO) letters, environmental assessments, and Federal Orders, to help you stay

informed about APHIS regulations and initiatives. These documents also

communicate updates related to fruit fly regulations and quarantines.

Loading...
Exhibit
32

# Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

---

I,
A. Jay Meyerson, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr., Chief Financial
Officer, of  Aames Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
  The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
  30, 2003(the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

*     *     *





|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER   
|----------------------- | --------------------------
|                        |                           
|                        |                           
|/s/ A. Jay Meyerson     | /s/ Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr.
|A. Jay Meyerson         | Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr.    
|                        |                           
|November 14, 2003       | November 14, 2003
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00063

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 360th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 360

- 696318

- 21

Before Womack , Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N THE 

### I NTEREST OF 

### B.M., A 

### C HILD2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT We have considered the parties’ “ Rule 42.1( a )(2) Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal a nd Remand t o Trial Court f or Entry o f Agreed Final Judgment .” It is the court’s opi nion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand this case to the trial court to render judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B ) ; Innovative Off

. Sys., Inc. v. Johnson , 911 S.W. 2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995) (order)

. Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: June 2 2 , 2023

1 Although the p hrase “

Joint Motion to Dismiss ” appears in t he title of the motion, the parties do not actually request that we dismiss this appeal

— and understandably so, because “ we cannot both s et aside the trial court ’ s judgment and d ismiss [ an

] appeal. ” Lone Tree Res

. & Cons ulting, Inc. v. Persepo lis, Inc. , No . 02

- 21

- 00246

- CV, 2021 WL 6143641, at *1 (Tex. App.

— F ort Worth Dec. 30, 2021, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.)

.
44 P.3d 285

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### Aquarian Foundation v. Association of Apartment Owners of Waikiki Park Heights

21732

03/02/2001

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part and Remanded
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

NAHLN Laboratories

Last Modified: 

Print

This page provides important information for existing NAHLN labs, including SOP lists

and maps of current NAHLN laboratories. The lists and maps are updated as changes

occur. Information on joining the NAHLN is also provided below.

Find Approved NAHLN Labs
View information for current NAHLN laboratories by State, designation, or disease

testing. Or, view all labs.

Labs by State

- Select a State - ▾

Loading...

NAHLN Laboratories Contacts

Labs by Designation

- Select a Term - ▾

Loading...

NAHLN Laboratories Contacts

Labs by Disease

AMR—Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Laboratories

ASF/CSF—African Swine Fever and Classic Swine Fever Laboratories

BSE—Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Laboratories

CWD—Chronic Wasting Disease Laboratories

FMD—Foot-and-Mouth Disease Laboratories

IAV-A—Influenza A Virus in Avian Laboratories

IAV-S—Influenza A Virus in Swine Laboratories

ISA—Infectious Salmon Anemia Laboratories

ND—Newcastle Disease Laboratories

PRV—Pseudorabies Laboratories

Scrapie Laboratories

SVC—Spring Viremia of Carp Laboratories

VHS—Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia Laboratories

VSV—Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Laboratories

Learn More About NAHLN Laboratories

Joining the NAHLN
For more information on NAHLN membership requirements or how your laboratory

can join, please contact the NAHLN Program Office.

Read more about the approval process

NAHLN SOPs and Deviations

NAHLN SOPs 

(PDF, 226.43 KB)

Download a current list of NAHLN SOPs.

NAHLN SOP Deviation Request Form and Instructions 

(PDF, 284.24 KB)

Download a copy of the current Deviation Request form and instructions for

submitting to the NAHLN Program Office.

Proficiency Testing

All proficiency tests for the NAHLN are administered through the National Veterinary

Services Laboratories' (NVSL) reference laboratories. 

View the current list of proficiency test panels available from NVSL

NAHLN Testing Requirements for Commercially Available Products

Information for commercial manufacturers of reagents and testing platforms on

minimum validation requirements for acceptance into the NAHLN. Additional

approvals by the NVSL, VS' Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, and the

appropriate commodity program may be required prior to deployment of new test

methods to NAHLN laboratories.

For questions regarding this process, contact the NAHLN Program Office at

nahln@usda.gov. For information on test panel availability, contact

nvsl.info@usda.gov.

View NAHLN approval process
October 5, 2004

25651

#### State v. Shiroma

Affirmed
EXHIBIT (24)17

                                   CERTIFICATE

         I,  Marilyn S.  Kirkland,  Secretary  of  Southwestern  Electric  Power
Company,  a Delaware  corporation (the  "Corporation"),  hereby certify that set
forth below is a complete and accurate copy of a certain  resolution  adopted by
the Board of Directors of the Corporation on this 26th day of January, 1999, and
that  such  resolution  is in  full  force  and  effect  as of the  date of this
certificate.


                       Southwestern Electric Power Company
                          Board of Directors Resolution
                                January 26, 1999

         RESOLVED,  that each officer of  Southwestern  Electric  Power  Company
listed at the end of this sentence is hereby authorized to make,  constitute and
appoint,  in his  respective  capacity,  a power  of  attorney  in  favor of the
person(s)  listed  directly after his name at the end of this  sentence,  as his
true and lawful  attorney(s)-in-fact and agent(s), with full power and authority
(and in the case of more than one attorney-in-fact, each attorney-in-fact acting
alone  and  without  the  other)  to  execute  in the name and on  behalf of the
officer, in any and all capacities, the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for 1998 and any and all  amendments  thereto,  to be filed under the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  as  amended,  and any other  documents  and  instruments
incidental  thereto,  and to file the same,  with all  exhibits  thereto and all
documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
and grant to such  attorney(s)-in-fact,  and  agent(s)  (and in the case of more
than  one  attorney-in-fact,   each  of  them),  full  power  and  authority  of
substitution  and  revocation in the premises and full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing  requisite  and necessary to be done in
and about the  premises,  as fully and all intents  and  purposes as the officer
might or could do in person.
1.  Michael H. Madison is authorized to make, constitute and appoint R. Russell
    Davis to be his attorney[s]-in-fact.
2.  R. Russell Davis is authorized to make, constitute and appoint Michael H.
    Madison to be his attorney[s]-in-fact.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of
Southwestern Electric Power Company this day, the 26th of January, 1999.



         /s/ Marilyn S. Kirkland
             Marilyn S. Kirkland
             Corporate Secretary


             COMPANY SEAL
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Friendship Between U.S.A. and France Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    London Planetree

Year
    2007

Location
      
Capitol Square, N.W.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text of the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Commemorative Tree

*Plantus x acerifolia ‘columbia’*
(Columbia London Planetree)

To Commemorate the Longstanding Friendship Between
the United States of America and France

Sponsored by
Sen. Mary Landrieu

April 4, 2007 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**EXHIBIT31.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,Mark R. Tauscher, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b) [Not Applicable];

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2007 | /s/ Mark R. Tauscher    |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                    | Mark R. Tauscher        |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### State v. Cadwallader

17532

8/24/94

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 548 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 548

 Expressing support for designation of February 12, 2016, as ``Darwin 
 Day'' and recognizing the importance of science in the betterment of 
                               humanity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 3, 2015

 Mr. Himes (for himself, Ms. Esty, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Schiff, Ms. Norton, 
 Mr. Grayson, Mr. Honda, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Lowenthal, Ms. Speier, Mr. 
 Cartwright, and Mr. Pocan) submitted the following resolution; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for designation of February 12, 2016, as ``Darwin 
 Day'' and recognizing the importance of science in the betterment of 
                               humanity.

Whereas Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by the mechanism of natural 
        selection, together with the monumental amount of scientific evidence he 
        compiled to support it, provides humanity with a logical and 
        intellectually compelling explanation for the diversity of life on 
        Earth;
Whereas the validity of Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection is 
        further strongly supported by the modern understanding of the science of 
        genetics;
Whereas it has been the human curiosity and ingenuity exemplified by Darwin that 
        has promoted new scientific discoveries that have helped humanity solve 
        many problems and improve living conditions;
Whereas the advancement of science must be protected from those unconcerned with 
        the adverse impacts of global warming and climate change;
Whereas the teaching of creationism in some public schools compromises the 
        scientific and academic integrity of the United States education 
        systems;
Whereas Charles Darwin is a worthy symbol of scientific advancement on which to 
        focus and around which to build a global celebration of science and 
        humanity intended to promote a common bond among all of Earth's peoples; 
        and
Whereas February 12, 2016, is the anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin in 
        1809 and would be an appropriate date to designate as ``Darwin Day'': 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Darwin Day''; and
            (2) recognizes Charles Darwin as a worthy symbol on which 
        to celebrate the achievements of reason, science, and the 
        advancement of human knowledge.
                                 <all>
```
March 15, 2000

22271

#### State v. Alapai

Affirmed
October 23, 2003

25231

#### State v. Azevedo

Affirmed
#### Julia Ovari, Plaintiff, *v.*Joseph A. Maultasch et al., Individually and as Executors of Philip Schoenfeld, Deceased, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

January 8, 1959.

*Dreyer S Traub*for defendants.

*Bosenbluth & Wolen*for plaintiff.

Mario Pittoni, J.

Motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivisions 1 and 5 of rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice, is denied.

*598The action is to recover the sum of $21,957.96 for services allegedly rendered to the defendant testate, Philip Schoenfeld, prior to his death in April, 1954. After the issuance of letters of temporary administration the plaintiff filed her claim in July, 1954 with the temporary administrators. Permission to sue the temporary administrator was sought pursuant to section 127 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, and was denied by the late Surrogate of Kings County, Ivan Rubenstein, in November, 1954. Thereafter, the plaintiff again sought relief in the Surrogate’s Court of Kings County by a citation returnable April 15, 1958. In answer to the plaintiff’s petition therein, the temporary administrators on April 15, 1958 rejected her claim. After the matter was set down for hearing before Surrogate Moss, letters testamentary were issued to the defendants on May 15,1958.

It is the contention of the defendants that the failure of the plaintiff to commence her action within three months after the rejection of her claim on April 15, 1958 barred her from the maintenance of an action under section 211 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. That section refers to the rejection of a claim by an executor or administrator. It does not mention a temporary administrator, for it was not “ the intent of the Legislature to hold that a creditor forfeited his right to bring action for a claim by a delay of three months after the rejection of his claim by a temporary administrator, when he could only sue by the permission of the surrogate, and any delay of the surrogate in deciding this motion which would place the time beyond three months’ period would defeat his right of action.” *(Matter of De Ridder,*183 App. Div. 657, 658.)

No claim was presented to the defendant executors after the issuance of letters testamentary on May 15,1958, nor is it necessary to present such claim before the maintenance of an action in the Supreme Court *(Elwyn*v. *Comeau,*8 Misc 2d 704, 707). The observation may be made, however, that if a motion were made pursuant to section 190-a of the Civil Practice Act, the cause would be transferred to the Surrogate’s Court as the claim involves a transaction with the decedent. *(Snow*v. *Snow,*13 Misc 2d 966; *Schoelles*v. *Zausmer,*2 A D 2d 979.)

Motion denied.

Submit order.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Media Operations, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (the
Report), I, David J. Pecker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, John F. Craven, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DAVID J. PECKERDavid J. PeckerChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)




/s/ JOHN F. CRAVENJohn F. CravenChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)


Date: August 30, 2007

This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability
of that Section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.