alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 416 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 416

   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives recognizing 
    community water fluoridation as one of the great public health 
                  initiatives on its 70th anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 2015

 Mr. Simpson (for himself, Mr. Cole, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Gosar, 
   Ms. Speier, Mr. Babin, Mr. Burgess, and Mr. Harper) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives recognizing 
    community water fluoridation as one of the great public health 
                  initiatives on its 70th anniversary.

Whereas fluoridation of community water supplies is the single most effective 
        public health measure to prevent tooth decay;
Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has proclaimed community 
        water fluoridation as one of ten great public health achievements of the 
        20th century; and
Whereas studies prove water fluoridation continues to be effective in reducing 
        dental decay by at least 25 percent in children and adults, even in the 
        of era widespread availability of fluoride from other sources, such as 
        fluoride toothpaste: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes community 
water fluoridation as a vitally important public health initiative on 
its 70th anniversary.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit








    
June 27, 2018
Par Hawaii Refining, LLC
800 Gessner Road, Suite 875
Houston, TX  77024


Re: Schedule F
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Supply and Offtake Agreement dated as of December 21, 2017, by and between J. Aron & Company LLC (“Aron”) and Par Hawaii Refining, LLC (the “Company”) (as amended, restated or modified from time to time, the “S&O Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning given to such terms in the S&O Agreement.


With respect to the S&O Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:


Effective as of the date hereof, Schedule F to the S&O Agreement is deleted and replaced in its entirety with the form of Schedule F attached hereto.   


Subject to the foregoing, the S&O Agreement is and remains in full force and effect.  


This letter agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when executed will be an original, and all of which, when taken together, will constitute one agreement.  Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this letter agreement by facsimile transmission will be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart hereof.  


This letter agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of the State of New York without regard to principles of conflicts of law.




 
 









Please indicate your agreement and acceptance of the foregoing by signing this letter agreement and returning a copy to the undersigned.  Upon your signature, this letter agreement shall become a binding agreement of the Company and Aron as of the date first written above.


Very truly yours,
J. ARON & COMPANY LLC


By:    /s/ Simon Collier     
Title:  Attorney-in-Fact    


AGREED AND ACCEPTED:


PAR HAWAII REFINING, LLC
By:    /s/ James Matthew Vaughn 
Title:  Vice President                    
















Schedule F


[Determination and Application of Deferred Payment Amount]
67 P.3d 791

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

April *25,*2003

25097

#### State v. Llanes

Vacated and Remanded
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Search Results
Welcome to search! Use the box below to search across the entire AOC.gov website.
Search
        
                  Content typearticle
  (336)landing_page
  (22)object
  (377)(-)
page
  (71)(-)
person
  (22)place
  (41)project
  (27)Displaying 91 - 93 of 93 Clear
            
          PersonCharles Bulfinch|June 9, 2010Appointed by President James Monroe and the Commissioner of Public Buildings, January 8, 1818; Office abolished June 25, 1829. Charles Bulfinch was hired by the commissioner of public buildings in 1818 to replace Benjamin Henry Latrobe . He continued the restoration of the two wings, which were
    PersonBenjamin Henry Latrobe|June 1, 2009Hired by President Thomas Jefferson, March 6, 1803; construction halted by July 1, 1811; Hired by President James Madison, April 6, 1815; Resigned November 20, 1817. Benjamin Henry Latrobe was hired by President Jefferson in 1803 to fill the position of "Surveyor of Public Buildings," with the
    PersonDr. William Thornton|June 9, 2008Design selected by President George Washington, 1793; appointed a commissioner of the federal city by President Washington, 1794, and served until 1802. Dr. William Thornton was an amateur architect who is honored as the "first architect" because his design for the U.S. Capitol was accepted by
    
            Pagination
    First page
            « First
                          Previous page
            ‹
                                      Page1
              Page2
              Page3
              Current page4 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HomePatient, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
F. Furlong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.

This Certification is executed as of May 14, 2003.




                                            /s/ Joseph F. Furlong
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Joseph F. Furlong
                                            Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 171 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 171

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 26, 2015.
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. ELECTION OF MEMBERS TO JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY AND 
              JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING.

    (a) Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.--The following Members are 
hereby elected to the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library, to serve with 
the chair of the Committee on House Administration and the chair of the 
Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch of the Committee on Appropriations:
            (1) Mr. Harper.
            (2) Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania.
            (3) Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California.
    (b) Joint Committee on Printing.--The following Members are hereby elected 
to the Joint Committee on Printing, to serve with the chair of the Committee on 
House Administration:
            (1) Mr. Harper.
            (2) Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois.
            (3) Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania.
            (4) Mr. Vargas.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
NUMBER 13-11-00280-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

CLIFTON KEENE, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 105th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Clifton Keene, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss 

his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). 

Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed 

the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our 
2

mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

4th day of August, 2011.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Paul C. McDonnel, Chief Financial Officer of Arrowhead Research
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 8, 2008



/s/ Paul C. McDonnelPaul C. McDonnelChief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)


A signed original of these written statements required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to Arrowhead Research Corporation and will be retained by Arrowhead Research Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
19525

#### State v. Tomei

Affirmed
Exhibit 99.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFG Investment Trust C (the "Trust"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer of the Trusts Managing Trustee, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
  (1)  the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
  /s/ Gary D. Engle
 Gary D. Engle
 President of AFG ASIT Corporation,
 the Managing Trustee of the Trust
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 November 14, 2003
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-51107

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE GUADALUPE CARRILLO-PALACIOS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:08-CR-188-ALL

Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Guadalupe Carrillo-Palacios (Carrillo) appeals the 70-month sentence

imposed upon his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry subsequent to having

been removed. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that his sentence within the

Sentencing Guidelines range is unreasonable in light of his difficult past, his

genuine attempts to rehabilitate, and the effect that incarceration would have

on his wife and his infant son. He argues that the sentence was greater than

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 22, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-51107

2

necessary to fulfill the sentencing purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Relying on

Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558, 574-75 (2007), Carrillo argues that

the presumption of reasonableness, see United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551,

553 (5th Cir. 2007), should not apply to his illegal reentry sentence because it is

not based on empirical data or experience. He argues that his criminal history

was double-counted because it was used to determine his offense level and his

criminal history category. 

Double counting is not impermissible unless the Guidelines so state.

United States v. Calbat, 266 F.3d 358, 364 (5th Cir. 2001). The sentencing

transcript shows that the court listened to and considered Carrillo’s arguments

and articulated reasons for rejecting those arguments and imposing a sentence

at the bottom of the applicable guidelines range. See Rita v. United States, 127

S. Ct. 2456, 2468-69 (2007). The district court considered the sentencing factors

set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), including Carrillo’s history, his new marriage,

and his infant son and concluded that a guidelines sentence was sufficient but

not greater than necessary to comply with the provisions of § 3553(a).

Accordingly, the sentence was not substantively unreasonable. See, e.g., United

States v. Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 339 (5th Cir. 2008). Carrillo has

failed to demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion in imposing a

within-guidelines sentence. See Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 597 (2007).

His sentence is therefore AFFIRMED.
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 288TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on February 4, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

State of Texas on behalf of the Criminal District Attorney for Bexar County, Jonathan Watkins, and Thomas

Velez, all in their official capacities, Appellant

V.

Stephen F. Brown, Jr, Appellee

No. 04-14-00635-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2014-CI-05810

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

We ORDER that each party bear his own costs of this appeal.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on April 15, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00635-CV

State of Texas on behalf of the Criminal District Attorney for Bexar County, Jonathan Watkins,

and Thomas Velez, all in their official capacities

v.

Stephen F. Brown, Jr

(NO. 2014-CI-05810 IN 288TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

REPORTER'S RECORD

FILING

$360.50

$195.00

EXEMPT

EXEMPT

BEXAR COUNTY INSURANCE PROVIDER

N/A

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this April 15, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
EXHIBIT
      10.54




Incentive
      Compensation
      Plan




The
      Company’s annual incentive compensation plan is intended to assist the Company
      in rewarding and motivating key employees, focuses strongly on Company and
      individual performance, and provides a fully competitive compensation package
      to
      plan participants.  As a pay-for-performance plan, cash incentive
      awards are paid annually based on the achievement of performance objectives
      for
      the year.  Under the plan, each plan participant is provided a range
      of potential annual incentive awards based on competitive award levels in the
      marketplace.  Actual awards paid under the plan are based on the
      Company’s corporate performance.  Individual performance is also
      considered in determining actual award levels, but is assessed in a
      non-formulaic fashion.  The incentive compensation plan performance
      objective is earnings per share performance against plan.  The maximum
      incentive awards that could be awarded to the Company’s named executive officers
      pursuant to the incentive compensation plan are as follows: chairman and chief
      executive officer – (150% x annual base salary); president and chief operating
      officer - (100% x annual base salary); vice presidents - (60% x annual base
      salary).
Exhibit 31.2
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ceradyne, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Jerrold J. PellizzonJerrold J. PellizzonChief Financial Officer
May 13, 2004

24899

#### State v. Dutro

Affirmed
##### 



Exhibit 12.6
 Central Illinois Light Company
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Combined
Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Ratios)
 Year Ended December 31,2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006Net income from continuing operations
    
    $
    50,128
    
    
    $
    44,883
    
    
    $
    32,384
    
    
    $
    25,296
    
    
    $
    47,012Less- Change in accounting principle
    
    
    
    
    
    
    24,080
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (2,497
    )
    
    
    Add- Taxes based on income
    
    
    26,472
    
    
    
    11,905
    
    
    
    5,450
    
    
    
    16,357
    
    
    
    9,966Net income before income taxes and change in
accounting principle
    
    
    76,600
    
    
    
    32,708
    
    
    
    37,834
    
    
    
    44,150
    
    
    
    56,978Add- fixed charges:Interest on long term debt
    
    
    27,196
    
    
    
    16,358
    
    
    
    15,179
    
    
    
    13,918
    
    
    
    18,044Estimated interest cost within rental expense
    
    
    1,619
    
    
    
    1,468
    
    
    
    395
    
    
    
    390
    
    
    
    289Amortization of net debt premium, discount,
and expenses
    
    
    544
    
    
    
    708
    
    
    
    611
    
    
    
    473
    
    
    
    705Total fixed charges
    
    
    29,359
    
    
    
    18,534
    
    
    
    16,185
    
    
    
    14,781
    
    
    
    19,038Earnings available for fixed charges
    
    
    105,959
    
    
    
    51,242
    
    
    
    54,019
    
    
    
    58,931
    
    
    
    76,016Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    3.60
    
    
    
    2.76
    
    
    
    3.33
    
    
    
    3.98
    
    
    
    3.99Earnings required for combined fixed
charges and preferred stock dividends:Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    2,159
    
    
    
    2,127
    
    
    
    2,062
    
    
    
    1,998
    
    
    
    1,933Adjustment to pre-tax basis
    
    
    1,140
    
    
    
    1,217
    
    
    
    346
    
    
    
    1,293
    
    
    
    4103,299
    
    
    
    3,344
    
    
    
    2,408
    
    
    
    3,291
    
    
    
    2,343Combined fixed charges and preferred stock
dividend requirements
    
    $
    32,658
    
    
    $
    21,878
    
    
    $
    18,593
    
    
    $
    18,072
    
    
    $
    21,381Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
and preferred stock dividend requirements
    
    
    3.24
    
    
    
    2.34
    
    
    
    2.90
    
    
    
    3.26
    
    
    
    3.55