alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Department of Agriculture
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

WS Directive os icon

MEMBERSHIP IN PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

Ls PURPOSE

To provide guidelines for membership and Payment of dues to
professional organizations.

2. REPLACEMENT HIGHLIGHTS
This directive revises WS Directive 4.170 dated 10/12/12.
3. POLICY

WS employees are encouraged to actively participate in
professional organizations, societies, meetings, and activities
that are beneficial to APHIS and enhance the professionalism of
the employee.

Government funds may not be used to pay for an employee’s
personal membership in a professional organization. However,
Agency funds may be used to pay for office membership with the
approval of the appropriate Director, State Director, Project
Leader, or Deputy Administrator. Official memberships should be
in the name of the Director, State Director, Project Leader, WS
National Coordinator, or Deputy Administrator seeking the
membership. The appropriate business address will be listed as
the mailing address. Newsletters, proceedings, journals, or
other material provided as a result of membership are Government
property and will be made available to WS employees.

4. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
Office membership dues may be paid using a U.S. Government credit
card. The procurement should clearly state the benefits of the
membership to APHIS/WS.

Dis REFERENCE

WS Directive 4.305, Meetings and Conferences (10/11/12),
http: //www.aphis.usda.gov/wildlife_damage/ws_dir ch4.shtml.

he Bat

Deputy Administrator
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 546 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 78
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 546

                          [Report No. 114-360]

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 22) to authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway 
     safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2015

   Mr. Woodall, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 22) to authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway 
     safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 22) 
to authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, 
and transit programs, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the conference report to its 
adoption without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate; and 
(2) one motion to recommit if applicable.
                                                  House Calendar No. 78

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 546

                          [Report No. 114-360]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 22) to authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway 
     safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 2, 2015

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 No. 33-86454, Form S-8 No. 333-86290, Form S-8 No. 33-
93856, Form S-8 No. 333-53775, Form S-8 No. 33-93844, Form S-8 No. 333-86523
and Form S-8 No. 333-86511 of Interpore International, Inc. of our report dated
February 4, 1998 (except for Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements
for which the date is February 11, 1998), relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Cross Medical
Products, Inc. and Subsidiary which appears in this Form 10-K.

                                        /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P.

Columbus, Ohio
March 13, 2000
May 31, 2000

22834

#### State v. Lean

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing by Ionatron, Inc. (the Company) of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
(the Report) I, Kenneth M. Wallace, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kenneth M. WallaceKenneth M. WallaceChief Financial Officer


Date: August 9, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centennial
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended November 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officer's knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: January 7, 2005

/s/ Michael J. Small
------------------------------------
Michael J. Small
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Antimicrobial Resistance Pilot Project

Last Modified: 

Print
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RUSSELL G. DE PASQUALE
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1487

[November 7, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Ilona Maxine Holmes

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 08

- 16792CF10A

.

Russell DePasquale, Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

CONCESSION OF ERROR

P ER C URIAM

.

Russell DePasquale appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post

- conviction relief

. We conclude that the trial court erred in denying the motion as successive and untimely. We therefore reverse and remand for the court to consider the

motion on its merits.

DePasquale was charged in this case with trafficking in oxycodone while he was on probation in three other cases for possession of cocaine. The court found that he violated probation by committing the new offense

and sentenced him to three consecutive terms of five years in prison. DePasquale filed a rule 3.850 motion in August 2012 that was denied following an evidentiary hearing.

In November 2014, DePasquale entered a negotiated plea to the trafficking charge and was sentenced to eight years in prison. He did not appeal. On November 1, 2016, he filed a rule 3.850 motion arguing that counsel misadvised him to enter the plea. He amended the motion in2 January 2018. The trial court denied the motion as untimely and successive to the August 2012 motion. This app eal followed.

The trial court erred in denying the motion as successive. The motion

filed in this case cannot be deemed successive to the motion filed in the VOP cases because DePasquale is challenging a different conviction and

sentence. See Rogers v. State , 970 So. 2d 884, 885 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). Also, DePasquale could not have raised his challenge to the November 2014 plea in his first motion because that motion was filed more than two years before the plea was entered.

The trial court also erred in denying the motion as untimely. Because DePasquale did not file a direct appeal, the judgment and sentence became final in December 2014, after the time for filing a notice of appeal expired.

See Rincon v. State , 996 So. 2d 922, 923 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008 ). DePasquale timely filed his rule 3.850 motion less than two years later, on November 1, 2016. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b). He was free to amend the motion in January 2018 because he did not allege any new claims and the court had not taken any acti on on the motion. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(e).

Accordingly, we reverse the denial of DePasquale’s rule 3.850 motion as successive and untimely and remand for the trial court to consider the January 2018 amended motion on its merits.

Reversed and rem anded.

D AMOORGIAN

, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 2.2

                             CERTIFICATE OF MERGER
                                       OF
                             EMP ACQUISITION CORP.
                                 WITH AND INTO
                              AMERICAN MEDIA, INC.

                       (Under Section 251 of the General
                   Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)

                  American Media, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby
certifies that:

         1. The name and state of incorporation of each of the constituent
corporations is as follows:

                  (a) EMP Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation ("EMP
Acquisition");

                  (b) American Media, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("American
Media").

         2. The Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Agreement and Plan of
Merger"), dated as of February 16, 1999, by and between EMP Acquisition and
American Media has been approved, adopted, certified, executed and acknowledged
by each of the constituent corporations in accordance with Section 251 (and by
the written consent of the stockholders of the constituent corporations in
accordance with Section 228) of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

         3. The name of the surviving corporation is American Media, Inc. (the
"Surviving Corporation").

         4. The Restated Certificate of Incorporation of American Media as in
effect immediately prior to the merger shall be amended in its entirety to read
as set forth in Exhibit A hereto and, as so amended, shall be the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation.

         5. The executed Agreement and Plan of Merger is on file at an office
of the Surviving Corporation at 600 East Coast Avenue, Lantana, Florida 33464.

         6. A copy of the Agreement and Plan of Merger will be furnished by the
Surviving Corporation, on request and without cost, to any stockholder of any
constituent corporation.



<PAGE>   2

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, American Media has caused this
certificate to be signed as of the 7th day of May, 1999.


                                         AMERICAN MEDIA, INC.



                                         By:  /s/ Maynard Rabinowitz
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Name: Maynard Rabinowitz
                                            Office: Vice-Chairman
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 7737

DARRELL HENRY WILLIAMS
,
Petitioner

- Appellant
,

v.
JOE COAKLEY, Warden, Hazelton USP
, Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling

. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.
, Senior District Judge. ( 5:18

- cv

- 00046

- FPS )

Submitted : April 14, 2020 Decided: April 17, 2020

Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Darrell Henry Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Darrell Henry Williams , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Williams’ 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (201 8 ) petition in which he sought to challenge his sentence by way of the savings

clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018). Pursua nt to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge his

sentence in a traditional writ of habeas corpus pursuant to § 2241 if a § 2255 motion would
be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.

[Section] 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of a sentence when: (1) at the time of sentencing, settled law of this circuit or the Supreme Court established the legality of the sentence; (2) subsequent to the prisoner’s direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the aforementioned sett led substantive law changed and was deemed to apply retroactively on collateral review; (3) the prisoner is unable to meet the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255(h)(2) for second or successive motions; and (4) due to this retroactive change, the sentence now presents an error sufficiently grave to be deemed a fundamental defect.

United States v. Wheeler , 886 F.3d 415, 429 (4th Cir. 2018).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although
we grant leave to proceed in forma paup eris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Williams v. Coakley , No. 5:18

- cv

- 00046

- FPS (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 29, 2019). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Traveling With Food or Agricultural

Products

Last Modified: 

Print

Welcome! This page will help you understand which foods or agricultural products

can be brought into the United States from another country or into the U.S. mainland

from Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Help Stop the Spread of African Swine Fever

Learn how foods containing pork can carry disease into the United States

Where Are You Traveling From?

Hawaii 
Puerto Rico or U.S. Virgin Islands 

Canada 

Another Country 
Important Travel Considerations

Information for Travelers Who Come Into Contact With Animals

U.S. citizens and international visitors who visit a farm or make contact with

live animals in another country can unknowingly spread potentially devastating

animal diseases.

Before entering the United States, travelers should:

1. Launder all clothing worn at the farm or while in contact with animals,

2. Remove any dirt or debris from shoes, equipment, or other articles before

packing them,

3. Shower or bathe, wash hair, clean fingernails, and clear nasal passages (blow

nose).

4. Declare to U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials that they have been in

close proximity to livestock before entering the United States. 
If you are traveling with a pet or other small animal, please visit Pet Travel for more

information on how to safely bring a pet into the United States.

Animal disease outbreaks occur regularly all over the world, and travelers may not

know when an outbreak has occurred. Some animal diseases (such as foot-andmouth disease, avian or swine influenza, African horse sickness, and many other

serious conditions of livestock and other animals) can survive and remain infectious

for up to a week on clothing, shoes, and other items. The diseases, while they may

not affect people, can also be carried on skin, hair, under fingernails, and in nasal

passages. In addition, pets–such as dogs, cats, birds, and other small animals–can

carry these diseases without showing any signs of illness.

Declaring Items at Customs

Travelers entering the United States must declare all agricultural or wildlife products

to U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials. You must also tell them if you visited

a farm or were in contact with animals before traveling to the United States.

U.S. agricultural inspectors will examine your items to be sure they meet entry

requirements and do not harbor harmful foreign pests or diseases. U.S. inspectors

have the authority to make a final determination about whether your products can

enter the country. We recommend that you keep receipts and original packaging of

agricultural products as proof of their country of origin.

As long as you declare all the agricultural products you are bringing with

you, you will not face any penalties—even if an inspector determines that

these products cannot enter the country.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO , et al. , Plaintiff s ,

v.
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY , et al. , Defendant s
. Civil Action No. 17

- 91 (BAH)
Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell

ORDER Upon consideration of the defendants Federal Emergency Management Agency and U.S. Department of Homeland Security ’ s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 8 , t he plaintiffs National Public Radio, Inc. and Robert Benincasa ’s Cross

- Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF
No. 9 , the re lated legal memoranda in support and opposition to these motions, the exhibits and affidavits attached thereto, and the entire record herein, for the reasons set out in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ Cross

- Mo tion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and
it is further
ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
SO ORDERED. This is a final and appealable order

. Date: November 21 , 201 7

__________________________ BERYL A. HOWELL Chief Judge
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MISONIX, INC. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Zaremba,
      Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 12, 2008





/s/
                Richard ZarembaRichard
                ZarembaSenior
                Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer
                and Secretary





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to MISONIX, INC. and will be retained by
      MISONIX, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0185

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DEVIN DERUSKY LANDUCCI,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including October 2, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 22 2023

08/22/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0185
July 13, 2005

25551

#### State v. Mukai

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 48 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 48

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 27, 2015.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 351) to provide for expedited approval of 
exportation of natural gas, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
27886

#### Sumí v. Chow

Affirmed