alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 313 

Expressing support for designation of May 23rd as ‘‘National Rosie the 

Riveter Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2015 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. HUFFMAN, and Mr. 

DESAULNIER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of May 23rd as ‘‘National 

Rosie the Riveter Day’’. 

Whereas National Rosie the Riveter Day is a collective national effort to raise awareness of the 16 million women 

working during World War II; 

Whereas Americans have chosen to honor female workers who 

contributed on the home front during World War II; 

Whereas these women left their homes to work or volunteer 

full-time in factories, farms, shipyards, airplane factories, 

banks, and other institutions in support of the military 

overseas; 

Whereas these women worked with the USO and Red Cross, 

drove trucks, riveted airplane parts, collected critical materials, rolled bandages, and served on rationing boards; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 313 IH 

Whereas it is fitting and proper to recognize and preserve the 

history and legacy of working women, including volunteer 

women, during World War II to promote cooperation and 

fellowship among such women and their descendants; 

Whereas these women and their descendants wish to further 

the advancement of patriotic ideas, excellence in the 

workplace, and loyalty to the United States of America; 

and 

Whereas May 23rd would be an appropriate date to designate 

as ‘‘National Rosie the Riveter Day’’: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Rosie 

3 the Riveter Day’’; and 

4 (2) acknowledges the important role played by 

5 women in World War II. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Harford B. Kirk, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

March 9, 1959.

*278
      *Sullivan, Donovan, Hanrahan, McGovern & Lane (Warren J. Dawson*of counsel), for Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as successor trustee, petitioner.

*Close, Griffiths, McCarthy é Gaynor*for Josepha K. Spotts, respondent.

*Leo Prager*for Samuel M. Sacher, respondent.

*Richard K. Gregory,*as special guardian for Francois De La Chesnaye and others, infants, respondent.

Joseph A. Cox, S.

In this proceeding to settle the intermediate account of the corporate substituted trustee petitioner seeks instructions as to allocation of certain stock distributions between principal and income. Objections have been filed by the special guardian on behalf of infant contingent remainder-men and by an assignee of a remainder interest. Petitioner proposes to allocate the stock distribution of General Electric Company in certain percentages as to principal and income according to the formula prescribed in *Matter of Osborne*(209 N. Y. 450). Objectants urge that the entire distribution be allocated to principal. The facts have been stipulated. The will is silent as to allocation of dividends and the provisions of section 17-a of the Personal Property Law would apply were it not for the fact that the trust herein was created prior to its enactment. *(City Bank Farmers Trust Co.*v. *Wylie,*273 N. Y. 304.) The rule in *Matter of Osborne (supra)*is therefore applicable and the formula in accordance therewith proposed by petitioner is proper and is approved by the court. The same allocation was proposed without objection in another trust in this estate and was directed by this court in the decree on accounting. With respect to the other stocks involved, Soeony Mobiloil Company (formerly Soeony Vacuum Oil Company) and Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company, the facts presented clearly show that the proposed allocation of the dividends to income, is proper and is approved by the court. The objections are overruled.

The reasonable compensation of the attorneys for petitioner is fixed and allowed in the sum of $2,150 together with reimbursements as requested.

Submit decree on notice settling the account accordingly.
June 20, 2005

26047

#### State v. Hernandez

Vacated and Remanded
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton

DONALD LOUIS DAVIDSON

v. Record No. 0662-95-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM KATHY L. NORMILE DAVIDSON SEPTEMBER 26, 1995

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge Designate (Sam Garrison; Richard Lee Lawrence & Associates, on briefs), for appellant. (Ellen S. Weinman, on brief), for appellee.

Donald Louis Davidson (husband) appeals the decision of the circuit court. Husband argues the circuit court erred when it ruled an agreement signed by husband and Kathy L. Normile Davidson (wife) was an enforceable property settlement agreement. Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. Rule 5A:27. Evidence in this matter was heard by the trial court ore

tenus . "Property settlement and support agreements are subject to the same rules of construction and interpretation applicable to contracts generally." Fry v. Schwarting , 4 Va. App. 173, 180, 355 S.E.2d 342, 346 (1987). "[O]n appeal if all the evidence which is necessary to construe a contract was presented to the

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 trial court and is before the reviewing court, the meaning and effect of the contract is a question of law which can readily be ascertained by this court." Id. The trial court ruled that the agreement was unambiguous and enforceable. We agree. "The fact that the parties attribute to the same terms variant meanings does not necessarily imply the existence of ambiguity where there otherwise is none." Smith v. Smith , 3 Va. App. 510, 513-14, 351 S.E.2d 593, 595 (1986). "Where there is no ambiguity in the terms of a contract, we must construe it as written, and we are not at liberty to search for the meaning of the provisions beyond the pertinent instrument itself." Id. at 514, 351 S.E.2d at 596. The terms of a property settlement agreement are presumed to be independent and, absent evidence to the contrary, will be

construed as such. See Eschner v. Eschner , 146 Va. 417, 422-23, 131 S.E. 800, 802 (1926); Gloth v. Gloth , 154 Va. 511, 549, 153 S.E. 879, 891 (1930); Lindley and Parley, Lindley on Separation Agreements and Anti-Nuptial Agreements , Vol. 2 § 25.02 at 25-7 to 25-8. A reading of the agreement in this case, confined to its four corners, fails to support the husband's contention that it is void under Kelley v. Kelley , 248 Va. 295, 449 S.E.2d 55 (1994). Unlike the agreement in question in Kelley , the parties here did not attempt to limit the court's "continuing jurisdiction to change or modify its decree relating to the maintenance and support of minor children." Id. at 298, 4493 S.E.2d at 56. Moreover, the parties have acted in accordance with the agreement since it was signed in 1991, and husband admitted that he had received benefits under its terms. "[T]he interpretation placed upon an agreement by the parties themselves is entitled to the greatest weight." Id. at 518, 351 S.E.2d at 598. Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is summarily affirmed. Affirmed.
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.2


MASTERCARD INCORPORATED
SCHEDULE OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ ANNUAL COMPENSATION
Effective as of June 26, 2018
 
 
	
				
	Non-employee Directors’ Annual Retainer 1,2,3

	Role
	Cash Compensation
	Equity Compensation4

	Chairman of the Board
	$180,000
	$275,000

	Other Non-employee Directors
	$100,000
	$195,000

	 

	Committee Members’ Cash Annual Retainer 2,3

	Role
	Audit
	Compensation
	Nominating

	Committee Chairman
	$30,000
	$25,000
	$20,000

	Other Committee Members
	$15,000
	$10,000
	$10,000




1  Customary expenses for attending Board and committee meetings are reimbursed and are not included as compensation.  The annual retainer and any committee retainer fees are prorated for partial year Board or committee service.
2  Cash compensation is paid in advance in January for the first half of the year and in arrears in December for the second half of the year.
3  Non-employee directors, including the Chairman of the Board, are eligible to defer all or part of their cash compensation into a non-qualified deferred compensation arrangement.  Directors who elect to defer cash compensation receive earnings on their deferrals based on investment elections.  None of the investment options provides returns considered to be above-market or preferential.
4  Annual stock grants are immediately vested and in the form of restricted stock or deferred stock units under Mastercard’s Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan.  Each director selects the form of his or her award during an annual election process.


1
April 28, 2003

24242

#### State v. Ruley

Affirmed
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XI, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:  November 7, 2002                   /s/ Robert A. Bourne
       ---------------------              --------------------------
                                          Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                          Title: President and Treasurer
November 15, 1996

16470

#### Beard v. Chang

Order No. 96-26

Affirmed
Publications Database Search

 Help

Simple Search: Submit

Advanced Search: Submit Reset

 

Title

Author / Editor

Year Division Document Type

Select All

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

Select All

ABL

FMA

HEPR

NMML

OCD

pre-AFSC

RACE

REFM

Select All

Abstract

AFSC Technical Memorandum

Book

Book Review

Document Chapter

F/NWC Technical Memorandum

Journal Article

Letter to Editor

Other Documents

Check heading checkbox

when selecting items from a

Webmaster | Privacy | Disclaimer | Accessibility

AFSC Publications Database Search Page 1 of 1

http://access.afsc.noaa.gov/pubs/search.cfm 3/7/2011
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Protected Resources

Last Modified: 

Print

We recommend and conduct integrated wildlife damage management activities to

protect many types of resources, including expansive sunflower fields in the

Dakotas; small vegetable gardens in suburban backyards; orchards in Oregon;

pasture land and cattle in Texas; bridges, roads and airports throughout the nation;

rare wetland ecosystems; threatened and endangered shorebirds; air passenger

safety; and industrial facilities in towns and cities.

Protecting Agriculture

Agricultural resources are associated with farming and ranching, and associated

industries. They include livestock (e.g., sheep, cattle, calves, fowl, and swine), crops

(e.g., corn, soybeans, strawberries, and pecans), rangeland and timber, aquaculture

(e.g., farm raised catfish and trout), agricultural animal feed, and animal products.

WS activities to protect agriculture may include managing predators to protect

livestock, alleviating bird damage at aquaculture facilities, and applying integrated

waterfowl and deer damage management programs to reduce crop damage.

Learn More About Our Work to Protect Agriculture
Protecting Natural Resources

Natural resources are those associated with publicly managed parks, lakes, state

and national forests, wildlife and fish, (including sensitive, threatened, and

endangered species), and wetlands. Natural resource protection includes the

protection of natural areas from the impacts of invasive species such as nutria and

feral swine, the safeguarding of rare, threatened and endangered wildlife species

from the negative impacts of more abundant ones, and the provision of information

and education on the ecology and values associated with wildlife encountered by the

public.

Learn More About Our Work to Protect Natural Resources
Protecting Property

Property resources are non-agricultural possessions. This resource category includes

business and residential buildings and structures, equipment, vehicles, and

machinery, pets and other companion animals, and a myriad of other items that are

valued by people. WS work to protect property may consist of waterfowl

management to protect golf courses, dispersing vultures to protect vehicles and

homes, and providing recommendations to reduce deer damage to backyard

gardens and landscape plantings.

Learn More About Our Work to Protect Property
Protecting Human Health and Safety

Human health and safety work is associated with the protecting people from death,

injury, and threats. This category includes human safety protection and response

related to wildlife-aircraft collisions, attacks on people by mountain lions and other

wildlife species, and rabies management activities.

Learn More About Our Work to Protect Human Health and Safety
EXHIBIT 32

                      DIRECT INSITE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


Certificate Pursuant to
             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
             as Adopted Pursuant to
             Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Direct Insite Corp.,  (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  James  A.
Cannavino,  Chief Executive  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: August 20, 2004


                                           /s/ James A. Cannavino
                                           ----------------------
                                           James A. Cannavino
                                           Chief Executive Officer




Certificate Pursuant to
            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
            as Adopted Pursuant to
            Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Direct Insite Corp.,  (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Michael J.
Beecher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: August 20, 2004

                                        /s/ Michael J. Beecher
                                        ----------------------
                                        Michael J. Beecher
                                        Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000879555
<NAME> BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND III LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,871,416
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               100,871,416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,391
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,032,851)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,966,460)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### State v. Camara

24675

10/14/2003

Vacated and remanded
**Exhibit 99.6**

CEO AND CFO SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

February 12, 2007



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street,
N.WWashington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act of
1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

E. Hunter Harrison, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Claude Mongeau, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, of Canadian National Railway Company, each certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:

| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and                                                                        
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Canadian National Railway Company.
|

|/s/ E. Hunter Harrison                |  | /s/ Claude Mongeau          
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                                      |  |                             
|E. Hunter Harrison                    |  | Claude Mongeau              
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | Executive Vice-President and
|                                      |  | Chief Financial Officer     

---
18871

#### Mailhiot v. Grand Wailea Co.

Affirmed
132 P.3d 1248

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Hebert

25754

04/07/2006

Denied

110 Hawai'i 284, 132 P.3d 852
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.01


DESCRIPTION OF ANNUAL INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN FOR FISCAL 2019


On June 14, 2018, the Board approved the Company’s Annual Incentive Bonus Plan for fiscal year 2019. The plan provides the Company’s executive officers with the opportunity to earn annual cash bonuses based upon the achievement of pre-established performance goals. Total bonus opportunities will be based on achievement of annual targets. The plan provides for 50% of the bonus to be based on the achievement of quarterly objectives and 50% to be based on the achievement of annual objectives. Performance measures under the plan will be: revenue growth, earnings per share, operating profit, and return on invested capital targets at the Company level; and, additionally for certain executives, total sales, operating profit and new business wins and other business-specific business unit targets at the business unit level. The plan allows awards to provide for different metrics, target levels and weightings for different executives.  The Board, or the Compensation Committee if so delegated by the Board, maintains the authority to reduce quarterly and annual bonus award payouts upon evaluation of each bonus award in the context of the Company’s overall performance.
 
Under the Annual Incentive Bonus Plan, target award opportunities are set at various percentages of base salary, which will be: 200% of base salary in the case of the Chief Executive Officer; 110% of base salary in the case of the Chief Financial Officer; and between 90% and 110% of base salary in the cases of other named executive officers. Actual payout opportunities for each bonus component will range from a threshold of 50% of target to a maximum of 200% of target for the quarterly payouts and a threshold of 50% of target to a maximum of 300% of target for the annual bonuses, in each case based on achievement of the performance measures. If the Company or business unit fails to achieve the threshold level for any performance measure, no payout is awarded for that measure. For purposes of determining achievement of award opportunities, the incentive bonus plan uses adjusted, non-GAAP measures.
IV 

House Calendar No. 45 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 338 

[Report No. 114–179] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1295) to extend the 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, the Generalized System of Preferences, the preferential duty treatment program for Haiti, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2015 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the 

House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill 

(H.R. 1295) to extend the African Growth and Opportunity Act, the Generalized System of Preferences, the 

preferential duty treatment program for Haiti, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 

3 (H.R. 1295) to extend the African Growth and OpporVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:39 Jun 24, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR338.RH HR338

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 338 RH 

1 tunity Act, the Generalized System of Preferences, the 

2 preferential duty treatment program for Haiti, and for 

3 other purposes, with the Senate amendment to the House 

4 amendment to the Senate amendment thereto, and to con5 sider in the House, without intervention of any point of 

6 order, a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on 

7 Ways and Means or his designee that the House concur 

8 in the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the 

9 Senate amendment. The Senate amendment and the mo10 tion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be de11 batable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

12 chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

13 Ways and Means. The previous question shall be consid14 ered as ordered on the motion to adoption without inter15 vening motion. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 45 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 338 

[Report No. 114–179] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendpurposes. duty treatment program for Haiti, and for other alized System of Preferences, the preferential African Growth and Opportunity Act, the Gener- amendment to the bill (H.R. 1295) to extend the ment to the House amendment to the Senate 

JUNE 24, 2015 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS