alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AEROSPACE Bombardier Inc. 400 chemin de la Côte-Vertu West Dorval, Québec, Canada H4S 1Y9 www.bombardier.com

TEL 514-855-5000 FAX 514-855-7401

July 9, 2010

Re: Docket No. FAA-2010-0636 Bombardier Aerospace is requesting an extension to the comment period for NPRM 10-10, “Airplane and Engine Certification Requirements in Supercooled Large Drop, Mixed Phase, and Ice Crystal Icing Conditions” in accordance with 14 CFR §11.47. The published comment period is currently just over 60 days. We find this insufficient for a proposal of this magnitude. The comment period for NPRMs has typically been 90 days for proposed rule changes of far lesser significance and complexity. Given the potential impact of this rule, and the magnitude of the effort required to review it, we feel the comment period should be 120 days. At a meeting with the GAMA Technical Policy Committee in May of this year, the FAA was informed that 30-day comment periods for draft policy and guidance material was too short and that comment periods of 60-90 days were required to conduct sufficient review. A 60-day comment period for NPRM 10-10 is a step in the opposite direction. The rule as proposed is expected to have a significant impact on icing certification requirements and a longer comment period will be required to consult with all stakeholders. There are more stakeholders for this proposal than is typical as a result of its far-reaching impact. Beyond the expected specialties of ice-accretion analysis, flight sciences and de-icing/anti-icing systems, the proposed requirements would have significant effects on flight test planning, flight test operations, and the analysis of aircraft and engine performance. The estimated economic impact of this rule likewise requires significant review by additional specialists. This large number of stakeholders complicates the coordination of review activities because of the increased number of schedule conflicts, requiring more time to complete the review. The fact that the proposal differentiates between aircraft above and below 60 000 lbs with irreversible control systems introduces further complexity to our review, given that Bombardier Docket Operations, M–30 U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Room W12–140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington DC 20590-0001
#### Ph. Wechsler & Son, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*Charles Winston, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 26, 1959.

*Richard W. Wallach*for plaintiff.

*Weisenthal <& Weisenthal*for defendant.

Samuel H. Hofstadter, J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment. He sues as the holder of notes indorsed by the defendant. The latter fails completely to support by affidavit the alleged defense that the indorsement was added after delivery of the notes upon a condition which has failed by reason of which the consideration has failed. Since the defendant has not asserted that plaintiff requested his indorsement after delivery of the notes upon any collateral agreement, the statement to that effect in the additional supporting affidavit made by another is incapable of raising a triable issue.

After another action had been instituted and judgment secured against the maker and other indorsers, one of the indorsers caused a third party to make an assignment of a lien to the plaintiff. Such assignment recites that it was given as security only. In addition, it was given in such circumstances that the contents thereof were fully known. It is claimed that such assignment was the consideration of an agreement that no action or further steps would be taken against this defendant and the other indorsers until either a certain property was sold or the assigned claim was liquidated and this, it is claimed, was a new agreement. If that were so, the original claim could not remain as basis for action in any circumstances. Such agreement is either an attempted agreement of settlement or an accord and is not only contrary to the terms of the assignment *213but is not in writing signed by the plaintiff. The motion is granted awarding judgment to the plaintiff as to the principal sum and directing assessment as to the legal expense.

Settle order.
Sept. 28, 2001

23626

#### State v. Schmidt

Reversed
EXHIBIT 10.23

                          Director Compensation Policy

1.   Non-employee  directors will receive an annual cash retainer of $35,000 for
     service on the board and  participation  on the three standing  committees.
     Pursuant to Section 9 of the Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan, as
     amended (the "1995 Plan"),  non-employee directors may elect to receive all
     or a portion of this retainer in stock options. Committee and sub-committee
     Chairs receive an additional cash retainer of $10,000.

2.   Non-employee  directors  will  receive a specified  amount for each special
     committee  served  on,  as  specified  from  time to time by the  Board  of
     Directors or relevant committee of the Board of Directors.

3.   Pursuant to Section 9 of the 1995 Plan, non-employee directors will receive
     an annual grant of stock options and restricted stock, the value and mix of
     which is determined each year by the Board of Directors, based on providing
     overall  compensation  in the range of the 75th  percentile  for a selected
     peer  group of  companies.  The  value for  fiscal  2007 is  $136,000.  The
     directors  can  elect  to take  the  restricted  stock in the form of stock
     options at a ratio of 3-to-1.

4.   Employee directors receive no additional  compensation for their service on
     the Board.

5.   Mr. Hill,  as  non-executive  chairman,  receives  annual  compensation  of
     $340,000.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 84874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26781]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the name of persons whose property and 
interests in property have been unblocked pursuant to Executive Order 
13288 of March 10, 2003, ``Blocking Property of Persons Undermining 
Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe'', as amended by 
Executive Order 13391 of November 22, 2005, ``Blocking Property of 
Additional Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in 
Zimbabwe.'' Additionally, OFAC is publishing an update to the 
identifying information of persons currently included on the Specially 
Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List).

DATES: See Supplementary Information section for effective date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    OFAC: Bradley T. Smith, Director, tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate 
Director for Global Targeting, tel: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director 
for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory 
Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant Director for Sanctions 
Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Action

    On November 30, 2023, OFAC removed from the SDN List the person 
listed below, whose property and interests in property were blocked 
pursuant to E.O. 13288, as amended by E.O. 13391. On November 30, 2022, 
OFAC determined that circumstances no longer warrant the inclusion of 
the following person on the SDN List under this authority. This person 
is no longer subject to the blocking provisions of Section 1(a) of E.O. 
13288, as amended by E.O. 13391.

Individual

    1. BONYONGWE, Happyton Mabhuya; DOB 6 Nov 1960; POB Chikomba 
District, Zimbabwe; nationality Zimbabwe; Director General, Central 
Intelligence Organization (individual) [ZIMBABWE]

    Dated: November 30, 2023.
Gregory T. Gatjanis,
Associate Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department 
of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2023-26781 Filed 12-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
132 P.3d 868

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### Block v. Block

26888

04/06/2006

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 328 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 328

   Commemorating the inaugural ``International Yoga Day'' on June 21.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2015

 Ms. Gabbard (for herself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Israel, Mr. Lewis, Mr. 
Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Crowley, and 
Mr. Smith of Washington) submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Commemorating the inaugural ``International Yoga Day'' on June 21.

Whereas the United Nations adopted the resolution on ``Yoga Day'' (A/ReS/69/131) 
        on December 11, 2014, which proclaimed that June 21 is the 
        ``International Day of Yoga'';
Whereas the practicing of yoga will help promote better health among the global 
        population and help encourage the need for healthier choices and 
        lifestyles; and
Whereas Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi addressed the United Nations 
        General Assembly on September 27, 2014, on the adoption of an 
        International Yoga Day, stating, ``Yoga is an invaluable gift of India's 
        ancient tradition. It embodies unity of mind and body; thought and 
        action; restraint and fulfillment; harmony between man and nature; a 
        holistic approach to health and well-being. It is not about exercise but 
        to discover the sense of oneness with yourself, the world and the 
        nature.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commemorates the inaugural ``International Yoga Day'';
            (2) supports the ideals that ``International Yoga Day'' 
        represents; and
            (3) encourages all individuals to participate in 
        ``International Yoga Day''.
                                 <all>
```
20 P.3d 632

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Jenkins

21729

01/18/2001

Affirmed in part, Vacated and Remanded in part
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

USDA Reminds Stakeholders to

Submit PPA-7721 Suggestions before

the August 9, 2023, Deadline

Print

Stakeholders have only two more to weeks to submit suggestions for fiscal year (FY)

2024 Plant Protection Act Section 7721 (PPA 7721) Plant Pest and Disease

Management and Disaster Prevention Program (PPDMDPP) funding. The deadline

is August 9, 2023, 7:00 pm eastern time.

APHIS provides funding to strengthen and safeguard the nation’s agricultural

infrastructure through the PPDMDPP. This year’s open period is one week longer to

allow stakeholders extra time to submit their suggestion into ServiceNow, the new

online platform.

You can find resources and guidance that includes the FY 2024 Implementation Plan,

templates, help session webinar PowerPoint, how to videos, frequently asked

questions and more at our website: www.aphis.usda.gov/ppa-projects. 

Access the PPA 7721 PPDMDPP Suggestion Submission site here.      

Also, the open period to apply for National Clean Plant Network (NCPN) program

funding will close on September 6, 2023. APHIS encourages stakeholders interested

in learning more about the NCPN program to visit the NCPN website. NCPN provides

high-quality propagative plant material free of plant pathogens to help U.S. specialty

crop growers compete in the global market. 
Please subscribe to the Plant Protection Act 7721 topic in the APHIS Stakeholder

Registry to receive email updates.
70 P.3d 663

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

September 30, 2002

24130

#### State v. Lee

Affirmed
17421

#### Ing v. Paden

Affirmed
##### 



EXHIBIT 9.9

DISCLOSURE UNDER ITEM 4 OF FORM 10-QSB REQUIRED BY ITEM 307 OF REGULATION S-K

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted
an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is
defined under Rule 13a-14(c) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), within 90 days of the filing date of
this report. Based on their evaluation, our principal executive officer and
principal accounting officer concluded that [identify registrant]s disclosure
controls and procedures are effective.

There have been no significant changes (including corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in our
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referenced above.

|                       |  |                                           
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated:  April 10, 2003 |  | /s/  Keith Witter
Chairman
Audit Committee
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centennial
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended February 28, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officer's knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: April 07, 2005

/s/ Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
-------------------------------------------------
Thomas J. Fitzpatrick
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. Rogers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                          |  | 
|------------------------- |  | 
|By: /s/ Michael W. Rogers
|Chief Financial Officer  
|                         
|December 14, 2004
**Exhibit 24.1**CENTEX CORPORATIONPOWER OF ATTORNEYTHE UNDERSIGNED hereby constitutes and appoints Timothy R. Eller and Frederic M. Poses, or eitherof such individuals, with full power of substitution in the premises, as the undersigned’s true andlawful agents and attorneys-in-fact (the “Attorneys-in-Fact”), with full power and authority in thename and on behalf of the undersigned, in her capacity as a Director of Centex Corporation (the“Company”), to execute and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission the Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, together with any and allamendments thereto.This Power of Attorney and all authority granted and conferred hereby shall continue indefinitelyand, unless waived by the Attorneys-in-Fact, may not be revoked until the Attorneys-in-Fact havereceived five days’ written notice of such revocation.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney this 11th day of May, 2006.              /s/ Barbara T. Alexander   Barbara T. Alexander   Director
#### State v. Sua

18624

12/05/96

Vacated and Remanded
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  November 19, 2007
/s/ John P. Manning   
John P. Manning 
Principal Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32(B)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard C. Christopher,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 7, 2007                    /s/ Richard C. Christopher
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard C. Christopher
                                        Vice President, Finance and Chief
                                        Financial Officer
                                        (principal financial officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       49
EXHIBIT 12



COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|                                    |  |                                           |  |                                                         |  |                                  |  |                                  |  |                                  |  |                                
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|                                    |  | Predecessor Company                       |  | The Company                                            
|(in thousands)                      |  | Six Weeks fromMarch 30,through May 6,1999 |  | Forty-six Weeks from May 7, 1999 through March 27, 2000 |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 26, 2001 |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 25, 2002 |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2003 |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 29,2004
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges1 |  | 14.x                                      |  |                                                        |  |                                 |  |                                 |  | 1.9x                             |  | 1.5x                           



|(1) | The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing earnings available for fixed charges (income (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary items
plus fixed charges) by fixed charges (interest expense plus that portion of rental expense deemed to represent interest and amortization of deferred debt issuance costs). For fiscal years 2002 and 2001, and the period from May 7, 1999 through March
27, 2000, historical earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $18.5 million, $8.4 million and $17.6 million, respectively.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------