alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply619Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  zuelifer (not ... (not verified)PermalinkSeptember 7, 2019 - 6:35amThanks for the article
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
18574

#### M & M Partners v. Loyalty Dev. Co.

Affirmed
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 23
- 00327
- CR
OSCAR REVELES CARRETE , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 13th District Court Navarro County, Texas Trial Court No. D41466
- CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION
In an open plea to the court , Oscar Reveles Carrete pled guilty to the offense of Tampering With or Fabricating Physical Evidence . T he trial court deferred an adjudication of guilt and placed Carrete on community supervision for 10 years. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Carrete ’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief in support of the motion asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.Carrete v . State Page 2 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Counsel's brief evidences a professional evaluation of the record for error and compliance with the other duties of appointed counsel. We conclude that counsel has performed the duties required of appointed counsel. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 ( Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see also Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 320 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, "after a full examination of all the proceedings, ... decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; see Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S. Ct. 346, 102 L. Ed. 2d 300 (1988); accord Stafford v.
State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 509

- 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or

" without merit" when it "lacks any basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals , 486 U.S. 429, 439 n. 10, 108 S. Ct. 1895, 100 L. Ed. 2d 440 (1988). After a review of the entire record in this appeal, we have determined the appeal to be wholly frivolo us. See Bledsoe
v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

- 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment. Counsel's motion to withdraw from representation of Carrete is granted.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Just ice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Affirmed; motion granted Opinion delivered and filed June 20 , 2024 Do not publish [CR 25 ]
Exhibit








Exhibit 4.2


AMENDMENT TO THE
GREEN BANCORP, INC. 2014 OMNIBUS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




THIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of April 3, 2018 to the Green Bancorp, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the “2014 Plan”). Any capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the 2014 Plan.


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 14 of the 2014 Plan, (i) the Board may amend, alter or terminate the 2014 Plan, but no amendment, alteration or termination shall be made that would impair the rights of a Participant under any Award theretofore granted without such Participant's consent, and (ii) unless the Board determines otherwise, the Board shall obtain approval of the Company’s stockholders for any amendment that would require such approval in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code, any rules of the stock exchange on which the Common Stock is traded or other Applicable Law.


WHEREAS, the Board has determined to amend the 2014 Plan in the manner set forth below, subject to approval by the stockholders.


NOW, THEREFORE, the 2014 Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to approval by the Company's stockholders:


1.    The first sentence of subsection (a) of Section 4 of the 2014 Plan is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:


“Subject to Section 5 hereof, the number of Shares that are reserved and available for issuance pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan shall be equal to 1,923,838 Shares.”


		
	2.
	Except as expressly amended by thus Amendment, all the terms and conditions of the 2014 Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




		
	3.
	This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Texas, without giving effect to principles of conflict of laws of such state.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

NAHMS Equine Studies

Last Modified: 

Print

The next NAHMS equine study, tentatively planned for 2026, will provide important

information about management practices used on U.S. equine operations and will

take a national, in-depth look at the industry’s most pressing health issues.
NAHMS recently completed a needs assessment survey of equine stakeholders to

gather input for the 2026 study. The survey will help identify the critical information

needs regarding health and management practices used in the U.S. equine industry

and ways to encourage equine owners to participate in the Equine 2026 study. We

expect to publish results of the needs assessment survey in early summer 2024.

In addition, NAHMS conducted studies on health and management practices on U.S.

equine operations in 2015, 2005, and 1998. NAHMS has also published

epidemiological reports on EHV-1 and piroplasmosis.

See the complete list of all NAHMS studies and related materials

Loading...

Equine Studies
## COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION

CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

JASON PULLIAM

JUSTICES FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335-2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210) 335-2762

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Fred Hernandez

Val Verde County Assistant District Attorney

P.O. Box 1405

Del Rio, TX 78841

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Stephen Foster

310 S. St. Mary's

Suite 2400

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-14-00671-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 11297CR

Style: The State of Texas

v.

Raul Becerra Castorena

The Appellant’s Response in the above styled and numbered cause has this date been

received and filed.

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

_______________________ Carmen De Leon

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53262
85 P.3d 1108

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

February 17, 2004

25074

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
##### 



Exhibit 32 Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of InfoNow Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), each
hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:  (a)
    
    the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2004, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Michael W. JohnsonMichael W. JohnsonChief Executive OfficerNovember 12, 2004/s/Harold R. HerbstHarold R. HerbstChief Financial OfficerNovember 12, 2004
NUMBER 13-21-00116-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

HOLLAND D. JONES, Appellant,

v.

ANGELA THOMAS, INDIVIDUALLY, 

MIKE TISDALE, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

ASPECT BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT 

GROUP, LLC, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 458th District Court

of Fort Bend County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva
2

This matter is before the Court on its own motion.1 On October 15, 2021, the Clerk 

of the Court notified appellant that, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), the appeal was 

subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant provided 

reasonable explanation for his failure to timely file a brief. Appellant failed to respond to 

the notice and has not filed a brief.

Appellant has neither reasonably explained his failure to file a motion for extension 

of time nor filed his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c).

CLARISSA SILVA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the 

18th day of November, 2021.

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the First Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket 

equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
#### State v. Miller

17182

8/24/94

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 189 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 189

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 14, 2015.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 650) to amend the Truth in Lending Act to 
modify the definitions of a mortgage originator and a high-cost mortgage. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are 
waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on 
any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 
one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one motion to 
recommit.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider 
in the House the bill (H.R. 685) to amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve 
upon the definitions provided for points and fees in connection with a mortgage 
transaction. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. 
The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
    Sec. 3.  The House hereby (1) takes from the Speaker's table the concurrent 
resolution (S. Con. Res. 11) setting forth the congressional budget for the 
United States Government for fiscal year 2016 and setting forth the appropriate 
budgetary levels for fiscal years 2017 through 2025; (2) adopts an amendment in 
the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of House Concurrent Resolution 
27, as adopted by the House; and (3) adopts such concurrent resolution, as 
amended.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Greff v. Nakamura

15761

5/14/96

Vacated and Remanded
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 84819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26789]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Savings and Loan 
Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461 et 
seq.) (HOLA), Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238), and Regulation MM (12 
CFR part 239), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to 
become a savings and loan holding company and/or to acquire the assets 
or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a 
savings association.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on whether the 
proposed transaction complies with the standards enumerated in the HOLA 
(12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of 
a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition 
of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 
10(c)(4)(B) of the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(4)(B)). Unless otherwise 
noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United 
States.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than January 5, 2024.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
[email protected]:
    1. Midfed Acquisition Corp., Wilmington, Delaware; to become a 
savings and loan holding company by acquiring Midland Capital Holdings 
Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquiring Midland Federal Savings 
and Loan Association, both of Bridgeview, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-26789 Filed 12-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
EXHIBIT  99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFG Investment Trust D (the "Trust"),
on  Form  10-Q  for the period ended March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Principal  Executive  Officer  of the Trust's Managing Trustee, hereby certifies
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:
(1)     the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and
(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of the Trust.

                    /s/  Gary  D.  Engle
                    --------------------
                    Gary  D.  Engle
President  of  AFG  ASIT  Corporation,
 the  Managing  Trustee  of  the  Trust
(Principal  Executive  Officer)
                    November  19,  2002
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                In connection with the quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Mark R. Tauscher, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:

 

                (1)  the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

                (2)  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 14, 2008 | By:    | /s/  Mark R. Tauscher                  |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Mark  R. Tauscher                      |
|                        |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                        |   | (Principal  Executive Officer)         |

 

 

 

                In connection with the quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, James G. Thomasch, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that, to his knowledge:

 

                (1)  the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

                (2)  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 14, 2008 | By:    | /s/  James G. Thomasch         |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                        |   | James  G. Thomasch             |
|                        |   | Chief  Financial Officer       |
|                        |   | (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

 

 

----
BEFORE THE 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

) 

Application of: ) 

) 

SERVICIOS INTEGRALES DE ) 

AVIACION, S.A. DE C.V. ) Docket OST -04-19340 

d/b/a FL YMEX ) 

) 

For an Exemption to Engage in Charter Air ) 

Transportation of Persons, Property and Mail ) 

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §40109 ) 

(U.S.-Mexico Passenger Charters) ) 

APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION AUTHORITY 

ERRATUM 

Communication with respect to this document should be sent to: 

April1, 2015 

Pierre Murphy 

Law Offices of Pierre Murphy 

1200 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. 

Suite 590 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

Telephone: (202) 776-3980 

Facsimile: (202) 776-3975 

Email: pmurphy@lopmurphy.com 
BEFORE THE 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

) 

Application of: ) 

) 

SERVICIOS INTEGRALES DE ) 

AVIACION, S.A. DE C.V. ) Docket OST -04-19340 

d/b/a FL YMEX ) 

) 

For an Exemption to Engage in Charter Air ) 

Transportation of Persons, Property and Mail ) 

Pursuant to 49 U .S.C. §40 109 ) 

(U.S.-Mexico Passenger Charters) ) 

APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION AUTHORITY 

ERRATUM 

Servicios Integrales de Aviacion, S.A. de C.V. d/b/a/ FlyMex ("FlyMex" or "Applicant") hereby 

submits this erratum to its March 3 0, 20 15 application for renewal of its exemption authority to include 

"Persons" in the caption such that it reads "For an Exemption to Engage in Charter Air Transportation of 

Persons, Property and Mail Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §40109" to conform with the relief requested. 

April1, 2015 Resp lly submi 

A

{L::hl 

w Offices WPierre Murphy 

00 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. 

Suite 590 

2 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

Telephone: (202) 776-3980 

Facsimile: (202) 776-3975 

Email: pmurphy@lopmurphy.com 

Attorney for 

Servicios Integrales de Aviacion, S.A. de C.V.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1169

_____________________________

GEORGE L. JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

December 4, 2023

PER CURIAM.

The Court denies the petition alleging ineffective assistance 

of appellate counsel on the merits. 

KELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

George L. Johnson, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
OMNI AIR INTERNATIONAL

P.O. BOX 582527  TULSA, OK 74158  918

- 836

- 5393  FAX: 918

- 831

- 3098 01 June 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M

- 30 West Building ground floor,

Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590

Ladies/Gentlemen:

In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR §11.25, Omni Air International petitions the Administrator for an extension of Exemption No. 10583 (docket number FAA

– 20 12

- 0 053 ).This exemption is set to expire on July 31 st 2014

.

Exemption 10583 provides relief, under certain conditions and limitations, from 14 CFR

121. 652 (a) and ( c ), to the extent necessary to allow Omni to substitute crosswind component and braking action restriction, along with a requirement to utilize automatic landing and approach coupler (ALAC) equipment, at the destination and alternate

ai rports in place of the existing restrictions to decision height (DH) and visibility minimums for pilots

- in

- command (PIC) who have not yet accumulated 100 hours (50, if reducible) in their current aircraft type.

This exemption has been used to the benefit of the traveling public for many years, with no known compromise of safety. With regard to public interest and equivalent levels of safety, the circumstances that warranted the initial grant of exemption continue

to exist.

The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. For this reason, and the reasons stated above, Omni Air International requests that a finding of good cause be made for waiving publication in the Federal Register. Granting the request for relief will set no precedents. The e xistence of the exemption is well known and widely accepted.

If any further information is required, please call me at (918) 831

- 3067.

Respectfully,

Robert E. Zeng Director of Operations

Omni Air International