alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                     140,606,369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,657,889
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,234,224)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           158,234,767
<PP&E>                                       4,894,109
<DEPRECIATION>                               (731,598)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             210,268,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,108,370
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    233,000
<COMMON>                                       858,921
<OTHER-SE>                                  93,244,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               210,268,343
<SALES>                                     48,840,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,840,578
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,369,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,191,139
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               252,711
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,428,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,682,224
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,686,254
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,978,095
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,978,095
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 13 65

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Carl Deon Sh in n
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ct of I owa - Des M oi ne s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Nov em

be r 6, 2 01 7 Fi le d: Nov em

be r 9, 2 01 7 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, BOW MAN, an d B ENTON, Ci rcu itJu dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Carl Sh in n di rect ly ap pe al s th e se nt en ce th e di st ric t co ur t im po se d up on 1

rev ok in g hi s su pe rv is ed rel eas e. His co un se l h a s mo ve d fo r le av e to wit hd raw an d

The Hon or ab le Jo hn A. Ja rv ey , Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r 1 th e So ut he rn Dis tri ct of I owa

.ha s fil ed a br ie f ch al le ng in g th e su bs ta nt iv e reas on ab le ne ss o f S h in n’s ab ov egu id e l i n e s p r is on te rm

. Sh in n ha s fil ed a pr o se br ie f ch al le ng in g th e rev oc at io n de ci si on an d h i s r e v o c at io n se nt en ce, an d arg ui ng th at he rece iv ed in effe ct iv e
as si st an ce o f co un se l.

Upo n care fu l rev ie w , w e co nc lu de th at th e rev oc at io n of Sh in n’s su pe rv is ed rel eas e was pr op er. Se e 18 U.S.C. § 35 83 (e)( 3) (s ta ti ng th at th e co ur t m ay rev ok e a te rm of su pe rv is ed rel eas e if it fin ds by a pr e p o n d e r a n c e of th e ev id en ce th at th e de fen da nt vi ol at ed a c on di ti on of su pe rv is ed rel eas e); Uni te d St at es v. Mil le r , 55 7 F.3 d 91 0, 91 3- 14 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (rev ie win g fo r cl ear erro r fact ua l fin di ng s r e la te d to a su pe rv is ed -rel eas e rev oc at io n)

. W e fu rth er co nc lu de th at th e rev oc at io n se nt en ce is no t su b s t a n ti ve ly un reas on ab le , as it is wit hi n th e st atut or y li m it s, an d th e co ur t ap pr op ria te ly con si de redrel ev an t fa ct or s. Se e 18 U.S.C. § 3 58 3( e) (i de nt ifyin g t he 18 U.S. C

. § 35 53 (a) fact or s th at th e co ur t m us t co ns id er be fo re rev ok in g a te rm of

su pe rv is ed rel eas e an d im po si ng a se nt en ce); Uni te d St at es v. Gro wd en , 66 3 F.3 d 98 2, 98 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 1 1 ) (p er cu ria m ) (rev ie win g th e su bs ta nt iv e reas on ab le ne ss of

a rev oc at io n se nt e n c e f

or an ab us e of di sc ret io n)

. As fo r Sh in n’s in effe ct iv eas si st an ce arg um en ts , we de cl in e to co ns id er th em on di rect ap pe al

. Se e Uni te d St at es
v. Hug he s , 33 0 F.3 d 10 68 , 10 69 (8 th Ci r. 2 0 0 3) (n ot in g th at in effe ct iv e-as si st an ce cl ai m s are m or e pr op erl y rev ie wed in co ll at eral pr oc eed in gs ). Co un se l’s m ot io n fo r le av e to wit hd raw i s g ran te d, an d t he jud gm en t i s af fir m ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
IV 

House Calendar No. 75 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 531 

[Report No. 114–342] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4038) to require that supplemental certifications and background investigations be completed prior 

to the admission of certain aliens as refugees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2015 

Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4038) to require 

that supplemental certifications and background investigations be completed prior to the admission of certain 

aliens as refugees, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 4038) to require that supplemental certifications and 

4 background investigations be completed prior to the ad5 mission of certain aliens as refugees, and for other purmstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 531 RH 

1 poses. All points of order against consideration of the bill 

2 are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points 

3 of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The pre4 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the bill 

5 and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 

6 intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 

7 divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

8 member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one 

9 motion to recommit. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

House Calendar No. 75 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 531 

[Report No. 114–342] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4038) 

for other purposes. the admission of certain aliens as refugees, and background investigations be completed prior to to require that supplemental certifications and 

NOVEMBER 18, 2015 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply614Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Ray Smith (not... (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 23, 2019 - 7:50amExcellent article!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
- " r • ••.'-r-^-'TTr 

SERVED JANUARY 11, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

JOEY D. WARDLE 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09CE0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0843 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

... On or before March I, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, 

but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely 

manner... 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09CE0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^BO 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Joey D. Wardle, Respondent 

1301 S. 15* Street 

Burlington, lA 52601 

TEL: 309-299-7502 

Mark G. Camacho, Claimant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3765 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor: 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant: 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 10(p)


                           HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION
                                VOTING AGREEMENT



         John R. Miller, Jr. hereby agrees that, for a four (4) year period
beginning on April 1, 1997 and ending on March 31, 2001, he will vote all
shares of stock (whether Class A, Class B or otherwise) of Hanover Foods
Corporation (a Pennsylvania corporation) which he is entitled to vote (whether
at shareholders meetings or otherwise) as directed by the Board of Directors of
the Hanover Foods Corporation, provided that Clayton J. Rohrbach, Jr., Arthur
S. Schaier, Cyril T. Noel, or a majority of them, vote in favor of the
direction.  John R. Miller, Jr. agrees that this Voting Agreement shall be
binding upon him and upon his estate, heirs, executors, administrators and
other representatives and he intends to be legally bound hereby.  John R.
Miller Jr. hereby revokes any proxy previously given with respect to the shares
of stock of Hanover Foods Corporation.  This Voting Agreement may not be
amended, supplemented, waived or terminated except by a written instrument
executed by John R. Miller, Jr. and Hanover Foods Corporation, acting through
its Board of Directors.  This Voting Agreement is executed pursuant to Section
1768(b) of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988 as amended and
shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania applicable to
contracts made and to performed solely in Pennsylvania.


                                        /s/ John R. Miller Jr.  (SEAL) 
                                        --------------------------------
                                        JOHN R. MILLER, JR.
DATED:  April 22, 1997



                                     -149-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0567 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LESLIE DEAN ERNST ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 5 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 30 2023

05/30/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0567
May 24, 2002

23123

#### Vallejo v. Ibarra

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Fund's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|Date:             |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|February 17, 2009 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc. N. Teal              
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH M. DEGRAW,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3612

[November 7, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, 

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 312015CF000016A, 312015CF000034A, 

312015CF000040A, 312015CF000089A, 312015CF000192A, and 

312015CF000215A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 25, 2019

NO. 03-17-00523-CV

Walter Zawislak, MD, Appellant

v.

Texas Medical Board, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND KELLY 

AFFIRMED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the district court on July 12, 2017. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

district court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s order. The appellant shall 

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with  the  Annual Report of Applebee's  International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended  December 29, 2002, as filed
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned,  in the capacities and dates indicated below, hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 14, 2003                 By: /s/ Lloyd L. Hill
     -----------------                  ----------------------------------------
                                        Lloyd L. Hill
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual  Report  of Applebee's  International,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 29, 2002, as filed
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned,  in the capacities and dates indicated below, hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 14, 2003                 By: /s/ Steven K. Lumpkin
     -----------------                  ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven K. Lumpkin
                                        Chief Financial Officer
United States Department of Agriculture 

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

WS Directive 2.310 07/28/03

ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES

1. PURPOSE 

To establish guidelines for WS activities associated with 

federally listed endangered and threatened species. 

2. REPLACEMENT HIGHLIGHTS 

This directive replaces ADC Directive 2.310 dated 3/26/93. 

3. POLICY 

WS will conduct its activities to minimize impact on any 

federally listed endangered or threatened species or adversely 

modifying listed critical habitat. 

The Director of the WS Operational Support Staff is responsible 

for notifying WS State Directors of any new or proposed Federal 

listings of endangered or threatened species. State Directors 

are responsible for knowing all federally proposed and listed 

endangered and threatened species and designated critical 

habitats that occur in their area of responsibility, and for 

conducting their program activities in a manner consistent with 

this policy. 

WS State Directors will assure that all of their WS employees 

(Federal and non-Federal) are familiar with the requirements of 

Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, as amended. WS 

employees will also be familiar with Section 7 biological 

opinions on listed species potentially impacted by their wildlife 

damage management activities. WS State Directors will initiate 

consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) if new 

damage management programs, new methods, or newly listed species 

result in the potential for adverse impacts. 

 

During routine work activities, incidents involving impacts on 

listed species will be reported by WS field personnel within 24 

hours to the appropriate WS supervisor. 

Unless otherwise authorized, the location of dead or seriously 

injured listed species will be immediately reported to the 

appropriate FWS Law Enforcement Office and State wildlife 

representative. 
When endangered species are responsible for causing damage, the 

WS State Director will work with the FWS to determine if 

acceptable solutions for controlling damage can be agreed upon 

and implemented. 

When a managing agency (Federal, state, tribal) requests WS 

assistance in protecting listed species or controlling damages 

caused by listed species, the requesting agency will bear 

responsibility for funding the work. The WS State Director will 

coordinate with appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies to 

arrange funding and determine acceptable control procedures. 

4. REFERENCES 

50 CFR Part 17 - Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. 

50 CFR Part 402 – Interagency Cooperation. 

Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543), as amended. 

Deputy Administrator