alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 324 

Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Muslim holy month of 

fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United 

States and throughout the world for their faith. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2015 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. 

KILDEE, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. 

CLAY, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Mrs. BEATTY, Ms. CLARKE of New 

York, Ms. EDWARDS, Ms. BASS, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. CLEAVER, 

Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. LEWIS, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS

of Illinois, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Ms. PLASKETT, and Mr. RUSH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Muslim 

holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United States and throughout 

the world for their faith. 

Whereas since the terrorist attacks on the United States on 

September 11, 2001, threats and incidents of violence 

have been directed at law-abiding, patriotic Americans of 

African, Arab, and South Asian descent, particularly 

members of the Islamic faith; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 324 IH 

Whereas, on September 14, 2001, the House of Representatives passed a concurrent resolution condemning bigotry 

and violence against Arab-Americans, American Muslims, 

and Americans from South Asia in the wake of the terrorist attacks; 

Whereas it is estimated that there are approximately 

1,600,000,000 Muslims worldwide; 

Whereas over 3,700 Muslims serve on active duty and over 

1,900 Muslims serve as selected reserve personnel in the 

United States Armed Forces; 

Whereas Ramadan is the holy month of fasting and spiritual 

renewal for Muslims worldwide, and is the 9th month of 

the Muslim calendar year; and 

Whereas the observance of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan commences at dusk on June 17, 2015, and continues 

for one lunar month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) during this time of conflict, in order to 

3 demonstrate solidarity with and support for mem4 bers of the community of Islam in the United States 

5 and throughout the world, the House of Representa6 tives recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the great 

7 religions of the world; and 

8 (2) in observance of and out of respect for the 

9 commencement of Ramadan, the Muslim holy month 

10 of fasting and spiritual renewal, the House of Rep11 resentatives acknowledges the onset of Ramadan and 

12 expresses its deepest respect to Muslims in the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 324 IH 

1 United States and throughout the world on this sig2 nificant occasion. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84333-84334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26642]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Office of 
Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, 
CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)-RFA-PS-24-063 Minority HIV 
Research Initiative (MARI): Epidemiologic, Behavioral, and 
Implementation Science Research in Racial/Ethnic Minority Communities 
Disproportionately Affected by HIV and Build Research Capacity Among 
Historically Underrepresented Researchers.
    Date: February 22-23, 2024.
    Time: 10 a.m.-5 p.m., EST.
    Place: Videoconference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seraphine A. Pitt Barnes, Ph.D., MPH,

[[Page 84334]]

CHES, Scientific Review Official, National Center for HIV, Viral 
Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H24-6, Atlanta, Georgia 
30329. Telephone: (770) 488-6115; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b787b6e3d4b686f68256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91e2e1f4a7d1f2f5f2bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023-26642 Filed 12-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Louis Battinelli, Jr., Appellant, v Jane A. Battinelli, Respondent.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered on October 5, 1990, which, *inter alia,*awarded the defendant annual support and maintenance in the amount of $80,000 until her death or remarriage, unanimously modified on the law to delete the language "until the death or remarriage of the Wife” from the first decretal paragraph, and to substitute the language "until the death of either party or until modification pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (9) or § 248”, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

*504The first decretal paragraph is modified, without opposition, to conform to the requirements of the statute.

General testimony by the wife as to the disabilities she suffers as a result of her age and medical condition was properly admitted since the effect of these conditions on the wife’s ability to work is readily apparent without the necessity of expert testimony *(see, Monahan v Weichert,*82 AD2d 102).

We have considered all of the plaintiff’s remaining arguments on appeal, and find them to be without merit. *(Leider v Otero-Leider,*161 AD2d 277.) Nor is there any basis to interfere with the trial court’s findings forming the basis for its awards. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
#### Soth v. First Church of Christ Scientist; Estate of Herbert, Matter of

16291

4/9/97

Granted

84 Hawai'i 415, 935 P.2d 130
#### In the Matter of the ESTATE of Annie B. GARDNER, also known as Annie Butler Gardner, Deceased. Gloria G. FENTON, Appellant, v. Gaylord S. GARDNER, Respondent.

No. 14729.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 18, 1977.

*1080Patrick H. Fenton, Cedar City, for appellant.

H. Ralph Klemm, Salt Lake City, for respondent.

ELLETT, Chief Justice:

Annie B. Gardner executed an olographic will in due and proper form on March 11, 1972. In the will she provided that:

> In the event my husband precedes me in death, I leave all I possess to our daughters, Tess Sorensen and Gloria Fen-ton to be evenly divided between them and their children shall take over their mother’s share if either Tess or Gloria have passed on. I direct that our son-in-law, Pat Fenton shall be executor of my estate and serve without bond .

Annie’s husband survived her and since the bequest and/or devise to the two daughters was conditioned upon the husband’s prior death, the estate is not disposed of by will. The trial court was of the opinion that the will could not be admitted to probate for the reason that it did not dispose of any property and, therefore, denied probate thereof.

Other provisions of the will provided that certain children and heirs of them receive nothing because they already had been provided for by gifts during Mrs. Gardner’s lifetime. The will also provided: “This will revokes all former wills.”

The trial court was in error in refusing to admit the will to probate. The files and records show that the Clerk of the Court has in its safekeeping a prior will of the decedent dated October 15, 1968. The will before the court revoked that prior will and any other prior wills which might subsequently be presented to the court. It disinherited certain heirs of her deceased son. It also appointed her son-in-law as executor and directed that he serve without bond. All of these matters are provided for in the present will. The fact that her estate will be distributed to others than the two daughters does not make the will invalid or give any basis for refusing probate.

The order of the trial court is reversed and the matter remanded with directions to admit the will to probate upon proof of its authenticity. Costs are awarded to the appellant.

CROCKETT, WILKINS, MAUGHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,337
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     42,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,726
<PP&E>                                         122,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,927
<BONDS>                                         16,218
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,038
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,057
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,007
<SALES>                                        260,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               260,621
<CGS>                                          193,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  193,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,985
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,804
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,367
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,437
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,437
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.62
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  November 21, 2005
/s/ John P. Manning   
John P. Manning 
Principal Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 7, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 28, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 121 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-81, CP2024-83.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-26819 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Nalu v. City & County of Honolulu

24621

09/15/2003

Affirmed
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: October 16, 2014 D-67-14 

 

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN

VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW

§ 468-a.

COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STANDARDS, ON MOTION

Petitioner;

DANIEL PETER SHEEHAN,

Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 1819861)

 

Calendar Date: August 25, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.

 

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards,

Albany, for petitioner.

Daniel Peter Sheehan, La Selva Beach, California,

respondent pro se.

 

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in

1971, was suspended by this Court's order dated September 24,

2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration

requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he

has complied with the attorney registration requirements of
-2- D-67-14 

Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of

the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object

to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered

reinstated, effective immediately.

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.,

concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is

further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and

counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
18443

#### Joyo v. Heely

Affirmed
#### J. P. Fredericks, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*El Diario Publishing Company, Inc. et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

August 22, 1957.

*515
      *I. Louis Friedman*for defendants.

*Edward M. Miller*for plaintiff.

Charles J. Beckinella, J.

Motion by defendants to dismiss the complaint under rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The action is in libel. The complaint charges defendant with publication of false and defamatory statements concerning plaintiff’s business methods which resulted in damage to plaintiff’s business. No special damage is alleged and defendants seek a dismissal of the complaint on two grounds: (1) that the matter set forth is not libelous per se, and, in the absence of special damage, the complaint must be dismissed; and (2) that plaintiff is not identified in the article in any way. With regard to the first ground of objection, Judge Crane stated, in *Ben-Oliel*v. *Press Pub. Co.*(251 N. Y. 250, 255-256): “The law of libel is very simple, and, briefly, is this: 1 “ Whatever words have a tendency to hurt, or are calculated to prejudice a man who seeks his livelihood by any trade or business, are actionable.” When proved to have been spoken in relation thereto, the action is supported, and unless the defendant shows a lawful excuse, the plaintiff is entitled to recover without allegation or proof of special damage, because both the falsity of the words and resulting damage are presumed.’” (Citing authority.) As to the second ground, it is not necessary to state in the complaint any extrinsic fact showing the application of the defamatory matter to plaintiff but the plaintiff may state in general terms that such matter was published or spoken concerning it (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 96; *Eastern Paper & Box Co.*v. *Cats Amer.*Co279 App. Div. 650). The matter complained of is libelous per se and the complaint is legally sufficient. The motion to dismiss is denied, with leave to defendants to answer within 20 days from the date of service of the order to be entered hereon, with notice of entry thereof.

Settle order.
#### State v. Marquez

25837

10/28/2005

Affirmed
141 P.3d 498

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### Tortorello v. Tortorello

27459

08/07/2006

Denied

112 Hawai'i 219, 145 P.3d 762
----

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Roy W. Olivier                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Roy W. Olivier                        |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7019

JESSIE RONALD WALLING, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-98-114-2) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 20, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jessie Ronald Walling, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jessie Ronald Walling seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Walling v. Angelone , No. CA-98-114-2 (E.D. Va. June 18, 1998). We deny Walling’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED