alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Senator Saltonstall Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Year
    1954

Location
      
U.S. Capitol, North Oval Lawn

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text on the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds 
Memorial Tree
 
Acer rubrum 
(Red Maple)
 
planted by 
Senator Leverett Saltonstall (Mass.)
 
April 28, 1954
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    The Senator Saltonstall tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.

The Senator Saltonstall tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
    The Senator Saltonstall tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.

The Senator Saltonstall tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.
    The Senator Saltonstall tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.

The Senator Saltonstall tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
    The Senator Saltonstall tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

The Senator Saltonstall tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

      Previous Image
        Next Image

          The Senator Saltonstall tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
      The Senator Saltonstall tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.
      The Senator Saltonstall tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
      The Senator Saltonstall tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997               
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997               
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997              
<CASH>                          520837               
<SECURITIES>                    0               
<RECEIVABLES>                   14163269               
<ALLOWANCES>                    424738               
<INVENTORY>                     0               
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0               
<PP&E>                          0               
<DEPRECIATION>                  0               
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  15292524              
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0              
<BONDS>                         0               
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           2412977               
<PREFERRED>                     0              
<COMMON>                        0              
<OTHER-SE>                      12879547               
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    15292524              
<SALES>                         0               
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1623863              
<CGS>                           0               
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   164173              
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0             
<LOSS-PROVISION>                434495               
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              198316              
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 826879               
<INCOME-TAX>                    0              
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             826879              
<DISCONTINUED>                  0             
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0              
<CHANGES>                       0               
<NET-INCOME>                    826879              
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .00               
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .00               
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.b**

 

I, Marc N.Teal, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BostonCapital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”);

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 
| Date:  | July 14,  2005 |                 | /s/ Marc N.  Teal |   |
|--------|---------------------|----------------------|-------------------|--------|
|   |                | Marc N.  Teal, Chief |
|   |                | Financial  Officer   |

 

1

----
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 00354

- CV

___________________________

Original Proc eed ing Trial Court No. PR

- 2014

- 00697

- 01

Before Birdwell
, Kerr , and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### T REATMENT 

### E QUIPMENT 

### C OMPANY 

### , J ANIS 

### V. S MITH AND 

### B RUCE 

### S. S MITH 

### , Relator s2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator s’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the
opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingl y, we lift our stay of the trial court ’ s September 19, 2019 “ Order Granting Plaintiff ’ s Second Motion t o Compel, t o Extend
Fact Discovery Deadline a nd t o Continue Trial Setting
, ” and we deny relator s’
petition for writ of mandamus

.
Per Curiam

Delivered : November 7, 2019
#### In re Frinzl, a Minor.

(No. 31682

Decided March 2, 1949.)

*Mr. Martin L. Sweeney,*for appellee Beverly Frinzl.

*Mr. Frank T. Cullitan,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Thomas V. Moore,*for appellants County Child Welfare Board and others.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, .'Stewart, Turner and Taet, JJ., concur.
The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals

 

NATHAN P. WILSON 300 DEXTER AVENUE LYNN DEVAUGHN

 CLERK MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104-3741 ASSISTANT CLERK

TELEPHONE 334-229-0733

January 26, 2024

CL-2023-0110

Thomas Rhett McAdams, Sr. v. Thomas Rhett McAdams, Jr., and Olivia 

Grace Wilkinson (Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court: CV-22-901099).

ORDER

You are hereby notified that the following action was taken in the 

above cause by the Court of Civil Appeals: 

Application for Rehearing Overruled. No opinion written on 

rehearing.

Thompson, P.J., and Moore, Edwards, Hanson, and Fridy, JJ., 

concur.

Nathan P. Wilson, Clerk
880 P.2d 770

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAPI

#### State v. Bryant

17071

8/04/94

Vacated and Remanded
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7100

GARY E. COLLINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JANE A. GARDNER, Principal; MARILYN J. JAMES,

Library Technician; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-00-540-7-23-BG)

Submitted: November 30, 2001 Decided: December 12, 2001

Before MOTZ and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary E. Collins, Appellant Pro Se. John Evans James, III, LEE,

ERTER, WILSON, JAMES, HOLLER & SMITH, L.L.C., Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary E. Collins appeals the district court’s orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint and

denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and orders accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Collins v.

Gardner, No. CA-00-540-7-23-BG (D.S.C. Mar. 30 and June 20, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
22533

#### Hawaii Government Employees Ass’n, AFSCME, Local 152, AFL-CIO v. Miike.

Affirmed
July 5, 2006

27466

#### Jones v. Marlin

Affirmed
H. Res. 292 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 10, 2015. 

Resolved, That on such date as the Speaker of the House 

of Representatives may designate, official photographs of the 

House may be taken while the House is in actual session. 

Payment for the costs associated with taking, preparing, and 

distributing such photographs may be made from the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### George Georgopoulous, Respondent, *v.*Beach Haven Apartments, No. 3, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

February 10, 1959.

*Bernard Helfenstein*and *Irwin B. Polinshy*for appellant.

*Alphonso V. Guardion*and *Bernard P. MeSherry*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff failed to present any valid reason or excuse for his delay of more than 27 months after joinder of issue, in bringing the cause on for trial. In the circumstances, it was error to deny defendant’s motion to dismiss the action unconditionally for lack of prosecution. *(Johnson*v. *Moody’s Investors Service,*285 App. Div. 966; *Brassner Mfg. Co.*v. *Consolidated Edison Co.,*1 A D 2d 840; *Hardware Mut. Cas. Co.*v. *Rosenberg,*3 A D 2d 988; *Fischer*v. *Tushnett,*256 App. Div. 833; *Birch*v. *Wolper,*1 A D 2d 1028; *Trapani*v. *Samuels,*3 A D 2d 861; *Rothman*v. *Skernick,*15 Misc 2d 962.)

The order should be unanimously modified by deleting therefrom the words “ Unless the plaintiff files a note of issue on or before September 8, 1958 ” and, as so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to the defendant.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Di Giovanna, JJ.

Order modified, etc.
EXHIBIT 23

                         Consent Of Independent Auditors



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements No. 333-111004, 333-109220, 333-70862, 333-45750, 333-88899,
333-43117, 333-22323, 033-56145, and 033-56147 on Form S-8 and Registration
Statements No. 333-91966 and 333-98741 on Form S-3 of Charming Shoppes, Inc., of
our report dated March 17, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Charming Shoppes, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended January 31, 2004.






                                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 8, 2004
1

The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-3327

___________

Michael Jeffery, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Southern District of Iowa.

*

Warden, John F. Ault, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 7, 2007

 Filed: May 5, 2008

___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Kelly Jeffery was sentenced to life in prison after an Iowa jury

convicted him of kidnapping and robbery in violation of Iowa Code Ann. §§ 710.1(3),

710.2, 711.1(1), 711.2 (West 2003). He appeals the district court’s1

 judgment denying

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The issue is whether the Iowa Court of Appeals

rendered a decision that was not contrary to, or involved no unreasonable application

of, clearly established federal law. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) (concerning habeas

claims adjudicated in state court); Iowa Code Ann. § 702.18 (West 2003) (defining
-2-

serious injury); Jeffery v. Iowa, No. 04-0351, 2005 WL 67591, at **1-2 (Iowa Ct.

App. Jan. 13, 2005) (affirming denial of petition for postconviction relief); Morales

v. Ault, 476 F.3d 545, 549-50 & n.3 (8th Cir.) (when state prisoner files federal habeas

petition, court of appeals, like district court, undertakes limited and deferential review

of state court decisions adjudicating his claims; to establish ineffective assistance,

movant must demonstrate that his attorney’s performance was deficient and that he

suffered prejudice as result), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 177 (2007); Rodriguez v. United

States, 17 F.3d 225, 226 (8th Cir. 1994) (per curiam) (counsel not ineffective for

failing to raise meritless challenge).

Because Jeffery has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), we decline to expand the certificate

of appealability granted by the district court to include Jeffery’s pro se arguments. 

We affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted, and Jeffery’s motion to appoint new counsel is denied.

______________________________
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
William Penn and the Indians
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Constantino Brumidi

Location
      
Capitol Rotunda

William Penn is shown at center with the Delaware Indians at the time of the Treaty of Shackamaxon. This treaty formalized the purchase of land in Pennsylvania and cemented an amicable relationship between the Quakers and the Indians for almost a hundred years. This scene was that last one on which Constantino Brumidi worked.

About the Frieze of American History

The frieze in the Rotunda of the United States Capitol contains a painted panorama depicting significant events in American history. Thomas U. Walter's 1859 cross-section drawing of the new dome (constructed 1855-1863) shows a recessed belt atop the Rotunda walls with relief sculpture.

Eventually it was painted in true fresco, a difficult and exacting technique in which the pigments are applied directly onto wet plaster. As the plaster cures the colors become part of the wall. Consequently, each section of plaster must be painted the day it is laid. The frieze is painted in grisaille, a monochrome of whites and browns that resembles sculpture. It measures 8 feet 4 inches in height and approximately 300 feet in circumference. It starts 58 feet above the floor. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 19, 2019

NO. 03-18-00644-CR

Leon Young, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is 

made.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Cervid Disease

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS monitors and manages infectious disease of farmed cervids (such as deer, elk,

and moose) to protect animal and public health as well as international trade.

Bovine Tuberculosis 

Bovine tuberculosis is a rare, bacterial disease that can affect deer, cattle, goats,

dogs, humans, and other mammals.
Brucellosis 

Brucellosis (also known as contagious abortion or Bang's disease) is a costly disease

of livestock and wildlife.

Chronic Wasting Disease 

Chronic wasting disease is a deadly, neurological illness that affects deer, elk,

moose, and other members of the Cervidae family.

Annual Cervid Health Reports

FY 2020

FY 2019

FY 2018

Disease Prevention and Management Programs

Cervids: Emergency Preparedness and Biosecurity

Chronic Wasting Disease Management and Response Funding Opportunities

Interstate Movement for Wild-Caught Cervids

National Animal Health Monitoring System Cervid Studies

One Health

Disease Surveillance and Research in Wild Cervids

APHIS Wildlife Services conducts surveillance and research on dozens of wildlife

diseases, including chronic wasting disease, bovine tuberculosis, and SARS-CoV-2.

For more information, visit our National Wildlife Disease Program and National

Wildlife Research Center.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 20, 2005 of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



| |  |                                                          |  | 
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ Keith E. Sirois                                      |  | 
| |  | Keith E. Sirois Chief Executive Officer October 24, 2005 |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



25