alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

About APHIS

Last Modified: 

Print

For nearly 50 years, APHIS has been protecting the health and value of America’s

agricultural and natural resources. It’s a vital mission: Healthy and profitable

American agriculture provides food and clothing for countless people worldwide and

is a key pillar of our economy.
Millions of people benefit from APHIS’ programs and services every day. As our

name suggests, APHIS’ work centers around animal and plant health, but our

programs also address animal welfare, biotechnology, wildlife damage management,

and global trade. Although APHIS may not be a household name, our efforts are seen

and felt both far and wide. From ensuring an abundant and affordable food supply,

safeguarding air travel against wildlife-related accidents, and sheltering household

pets from harm during a disaster, to protecting the trees in our forests and

communities, APHIS’ work touches people’s lives in a multitude of ways.

APHIS’ strong commitment to serving the American people guides all that we do.

With an eye toward excellence and value, we’re constantly finding new ways to

accomplish our work so that APHIS’ way of doing business reflects the way

agriculture and commerce operate today. We are using more technology to allow

industry to move at the speed of commerce and keep up with demand for

agricultural commodities. We are developing better, faster processes and

streamlining operations to improve our customers’ experience and deliver services

more effectively. And, we are increasingly looking to innovative, nonregulatory

solutions to achieve our aims—making sure agriculture stays healthy while ensuring

the swift flow of trade. These actions—and many others—are saving both time and

money as APHIS strives to better serve its stakeholders and the American public.
**EXHIBIT 32.b**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II L.P.(the “Fund”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the Fund’s general partner, BostonCapital Associates II L.L.C., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, asadopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge, after due inquiry:

 
| (1)    | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15  of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                |
| (2)    | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |

 

 
| Date:               |   |                         |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------|
| June 29,  2010 |   | /s/  Marc N. Teal            |
|                |   |                         |
|                |   | Marc  N. Teal                |
|                |   | Principal  Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fundand will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00149-CV

IN RE GEORGE CONLEY RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 23, 2012

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Xstream Beverage Network, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Theodore
Farnsworth, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer and
principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS.
1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                       /s/ Theodore Farnsworth
                                       -----------------------
                                       Theodore Farnsworth
                                       Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and
                                       principal executive officer

May 6, 2005
February 16, 1999

21611

#### State v. Kaeo

Affirmed
#### Miller v. Tanaka

17148

1/16/96

Denied

80 Hawai'i 358, 910 P.2d 129
#### Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company, Plaintiff, *v.*Joseph Senatore, as Administrator of the Estate of Marietta Senatore, Deceased, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

April 15, 1959.

*Irving Segal*for plaintiff.

*Samuel Turchin,*for Joseph Senatore, as administrator, defendant.

*Benjamin Lipson*for Sol Rosenberg and another, defendants.

Saul S. Streit, J.

A death action has been instituted and is pending, brought by the defendant estate against the codefendant owners. Death arose, as is alleged, by reason of failure to comply with the provisions of section 64 of the Multiple Dwelling Law and related statutory and municipal requirements. Failure of required heat supply endured for a period of about one year, when death from pneumonia ensued. Plaintiff has brought this action for a judgment declaring that pursuant to its policy it has properly and lawfully disclaimed liability and obligation to defend because legal liability, the subject of the death action, did not arise from bodily injury or disease caused by accident. It now moves for summary judgment. *Jackson*v. *Employers’ Liab. Assur. Corp*(139 Misc. 686, affd. 234 App. Div. 893, affd. 259 N. Y. 559) and *New York Cas. Co.*v. *Barbieri*(196 Misc. 203) are controlling. While the former was decided after trial of the death action and involved a death occurring about two months after the onset of violation of the statute, the latter was determined before the trial of the death action, and the period of statutory violation there was but several days. In the absence of a traumatic injury or a sudden and instant happening identifiable in space or time, disease and death cannot impose liability within the coverage of the policy. The result is not due to accidental injury. *McGettrick*v. *Fidelity & Cas. Co.*(264 F. 2d 883) relied on by the defendants, is not applicable. There was involved in that action the duty of the insurer to investigate before determining whether an action brought against the insured based upon an assault and battery was covered by the policy. Thus, there was at the threshold a sudden and instant happening not present here.

The motion is granted. Settle order.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10444 Summary Calendar

MICHAEL WAYNE HARKNESS Petitioner-Appellant

v. NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CV-215
Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Michael Wayne Harkness, former Texas prisoner # 1235550, pleaded guilty to felony driving while intoxic ated and was sentenced to four years of imprisonment. Harkness now seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging the denial of mandatory supervision. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 20, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-10444

2 During the pendency of this appeal, Harkness was released from prison to mandatory supervision. As a result, Harkness’s due process claim challenging the denial of§ 2254 petition has been rendered moot. SeeSpencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland , 821 F.2d 277, 278-79 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as moot. APPEAL DISMISSED; COA MOTION DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 294 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 294

  Expressing support for the continuation of the Perkins Loan Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2015

    Mr. Messer (for himself and Mr. Pocan) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for the continuation of the Perkins Loan Program.

Whereas the Perkins Loan Program is the Nation's longest running Federal student 
        loan program, created in 1958 as the National Defense Student Loan 
        Program and later called the National Direct Loan Program;
Whereas Perkins Loans are efficient, need-based, low-interest loans that serve 
        500,000 low-income college students with high need at some 1,500 
        colleges and universities each year;
Whereas Perkins Loans have favorable terms for students; for example, interest 
        is not charged while students are in school, the interest rate is low 
        and fixed, and borrowers may have all or part of their Perkins Loans 
        cancelled if they undertake certain public service jobs for one to five 
        years;
Whereas participating schools share the risk of the Perkins Loan Program because 
        they provide a one-third match to Federal capital contributions, and 
        loans are made using funds repaid by previous borrowers;
Whereas Perkins Loans features the human touch of campus-based servicing, which 
        allows on-campus administrators to provide Perkins borrowers with one-
        on-one service;
Whereas Perkins loans have made higher education possible for millions of 
        Americans; and
Whereas without Perkins Loans, thousands of Americans will lose the chance at 
        higher education and a better life: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives strongly supports the 
continuation of the Perkins Loan Program in order to provide 
educational opportunities to future generations of students who need 
low-cost financing to make their dreams of higher education possible.
                                 <all>
```
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12455Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  MICHAEL J. LILLY (not verified)PermalinkMay 12, 2023 - 6:06pmTHANK YOU FOR NOT ONLY THE PHOTOS BUT YOUR DISCRUPTIONS OF WHAT AND HOW, BIG HELP!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Commenting Opportunities:

Biotechnology

Last Modified: 

Print

Tell us what you think!

As biotechnology evolves, our rules need to evolve with it. Your input helps us make

better-informed decisions about actions and processes that may interest you. Check

out this page for opportunities for public comment.
Latest Commenting Opportunities

3/21/24

USDA Seeks Public Input on Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Deregulation

of Maize Developed Using Genetic Engineering

3/20/24

USDA Solicits Input on Petition to Deregulate Corn Developed Using Genetic

Engineering

11/29/23

USDA Deregulates Corn Developed Using Genetic Engineering

11/08/22

USDA Seeks Public Input on Draft Environmental Documents for Deregulation of

American Chestnut Developed Using Genetic Engineering

Related Links

Biotechnology: Federal Register Table 

APHIS: All Federal Register Posts

APHIS News and Updates

Stay in the Know

For the latest news about biotechnology, sign up for email updates.

Subscribe
#### State v. Ngo

19528

10/02/96

Affirmed
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF CERADYNE, INC.



|                                          |  |                                                             
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                        |  | State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|Ceradyne ESK, LLC                         |  | Delaware                                                    
|                                          | 
|     ESK Ceramics Geschäftsführungs GmbH |  | Germany                                                     
|                                          | 
|     ESK Ceramics GmbH and Co. KG        |  | Germany                                                     
|                                          | 
|o ESK Ceramics France S.A.S.U.            |  | France                                                      
|                                          | 
|Ceradyne Canadian Holdings, Inc.          |  | Delaware                                                    
|                                          | 
|     Ceradyne Canada ULC                 |  | Alberta, Canada
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00418

- CR

Brandon Kurtis Jewell

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 2

o f Parker County (CCL2

- 12

- 0334 )

July 10, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgme nt. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Lee Gabriel

___________________ Justice Lee Gabriel
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 83143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Biophysics and Biochemistry Fellowship Review.
    Date: December 13, 2023.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Dennis Pantazatos, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 594-2381, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#482c2d2626213b663829263c2932293c273b08262120662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5135343f3f38227f21303f25302b30253e22113f38397f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Chronic Dysfunction and Integrative Neurodegeneration.
    Date: December 18, 2023.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Bernard Rajeev Srambical Wilfred, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 480-6813, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#187a7d6a76796a7c366b6a79757a717b79746f71747e6a7d7c58767170367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="503235223e3122347e2322313d323933313c27393c36223534103e39387e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 21, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-26127 Filed 11-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Image Terms of Use
These images are in the public domain and, unless otherwise noted, may be used without permission for educational, scholarly or personal (i.e., nonpromotional, nonadvertising) purposes. These terms also apply to images on all other official AOC social and web properties.
        
                  When any of the AOC's images are used in print or electronic publications, the photographic credit line should read "Architect of the Capitol." If an image requires additional use permission, a note to that effect appears on the relevant download page.

**These images may not be used in any way that would imply endorsement by the Architect of the Capitol or the United States Congress of a product, service or point of view.**Photographs from the records of the Architect of the Capitol may be used for scholarly or educational purposes; they are not made available for promotional or advertising purposes.

A detail or cropped image may not be used in a publication unless (a) it is clearly identified as a detail or cropped version of the larger work and (b) the full image appears elsewhere in the publication.

For information about ordering images and permission to publish, please contact us through our web form or send a letter identifying the image that you would like to use and the purpose for which you wish to use it to one of the below.

**Mailing Address:**
AOC Image Usage
c/o Architect of the Capitol
U.S. Capitol
Washington, DC 20515 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Ferric sulfate

INSTRUCTIONS: Please type or print in ink. Please read carefully the attached instructions and supply the information requested on this form. 

Use additional sheet(s) if necessary.

4. Guideline Requirement Number

5. Study Title

1. Company Name and Address

United States Environmental Protection 

Agency Washington, D.C. 20460

REQUIREMENTS STATUS AND REGISTRANT'S RESPONSE

3. Date and Type of DC

ID #GENERIC30-Jul-2010

RR-034902-2

2. Case # and Name

4058 Iron salts

Chemical # and Name 034902

LILLY MILLER BRANDSPO Box 1019SALEM, VA 241531019

7. Test Substance

6. Use Pattern

P

R

O

T

O

C

O

L

Progress

Reports

1 2 3

Nontarget Plant Protection Data Requirements (ConventionalChemical)

850.4100 Terrestrial plant toxicity, Tier 1 (seeding emergence) (2 ,3 ,8) N C TEP 850.4150 Terrestrial plant toxicity, Tier 1 (vegetative vigor) (4 ,5 ,6 ,7) N C TEP 

Product Chemistry Data Requirements (ConventionalChemical)

830.7050 UV/Visible absorption N C PAI; TGAI 

Terrestrial and Aquatic Nontarget Organisms DataRequirements (Conventional Chemical)

850.3020 Honey bee acute contact toxicity (1) N C TGAI 

12. Name of Company 13. Phone NumbSignature and Title of Company's Authorized Representative__________________________________10. Certification I certify that the statements made on this form and all attachments are true, accurate, and complete. I acknowledge that any knowingly false or misleading statement may be punishable by fine, imprisonment or both under applicable law

11. Date