alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21


                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMMON STOCK WARRANT
                                  (May 9, 1996)

     This Amendment is entered into as of May 9, 1996, by and between Insight
Imaging Systems, Inc. ("Insight"), a California corporation, and Name with 
respect to that certain Common Stock Warrant (the "Warrant"), dated WarrantDate,
by and between Insight and Warrantholder, as follows:

     1.   EFFECT OF NEW IMAGE ACQUISITION.  The parties agree that to the extent
that the provisions of Section 1.1(ii) of the Warrant would prevent exercise of
the Warrant after the closing of the transactions contemplated in that certain 
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and among New Image Industries, Inc., 
Wisdom Acquisition Corp., and Insight, dated as of May 9, 1996, the 
provisions of Section 1.1(ii) are to that extent waived and the Warrant shall 
remain exercisable following the closing of such transactions. This waiver shall
not constitute a waiver as to any other transaction which would come within the
provisions of Section 1.1(ii).

     2.   Except as amended hereby, the Warrant shall remain in full force and
effect.

     WHEREFORE, the parties have entered into this Amendment.


Insight Imaging Systems, Inc.                      SigningName


By:                                         By
   -------------------------------            -------------------------------
     Mark W. Stevens,                           SigningPerson
     President
1 



    	 



    




 


 


 



    	2 



    	 



    




 


 


 



    	3 



    	 



    




 


 


 



    	4 



    	 



    




 


 


 



    	5 



    	 



    




 


 


 



    	6 



    	 



    

 


 


 



    	7
Exhibit
99.3





KPMG LLP
              Telephone
              (514)
      840-2100Chartered
      Accountants
              Fax
              (514)
      840-2187600 de
      Maisonneuve Blvd. West
              Internet
              www.kpmg.caSuite
      1500Tour
      KPMGMontréal
      (Québec) H3A 0A3
  
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  The Board
of Directors of
 Canadian
National Railway Company
  We
consent to the use of our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm dated February 5, 2009 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Canadian National Railway Company as at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in
shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2008, and our Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm dated February 5, 2009 on the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which is included in this
annual report on Form 40-F of Canadian National Railway Company for the year
ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated by reference, in the registration
statement (No. 333-147725) on Form F-9 through the 6-K filing on February 5,
2009.
  /s/ KPMG
LLP
 Chartered
Accountants
  Montréal,
Canada
 February
5, 2009
 
 
  KPMG LLP
      is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member of the
      KPMG
                  network of
      independent member firms affiliated with KPMGInternational,
      a Swiss cooperative
                    KPMG Canada
      provides services to KPMG LLP
The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1

the Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2755

___________

Eddie C. Risdal, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

John Emmett; Hill, C/O, sued as I.S.P. *

Guard Hill; Osborn, sued as I.S.P. * [UNPUBLISHED]

Cert-Team Osborn, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: June 2, 1998

 Filed: June 25, 1998 

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Eddie C. Risdal appeals the district court&s denial of his motion for a new trial 1

following entry of judgment upon a jury verdict in favor of defendants in Risdal&s 42

U.S.C. § 1983 action. Risdal did not submit a transcript, see Fed. R. App. P. 10(b),

and to the extent Risdal&s arguments are reviewable without a transcript, we believe the
-2-

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Risdal&s motion for a new trial, see

Gray v. Bicknell, 86 F.3d 1472, 1480-81 (8th Cir. 1996). See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
BE Aerospace, Inc. • Life Support Systems • 10800 Pflumm Road • Lenexa, KS 66215 USA

TEL: +1.913.338.9800 • FAX: +1.913.469.8419 • www.beaerospace.com Dear Mr. Blancaneaux,

B/E Aerospace is able to state that container assemblies t hat were manufactured after March 1, 2006 did not contain masks that were manufactu red before March 1, 2006. After they left our facility and were delivered to A irbus we can assume that Airbus did not replace the new masks with spares prior to delivery t o the airlines. From the time that the airlines took delivery, we can no longer confirm that the masks installed would still be the original installed masks. This is up to the airline t o maintain records of their maintenance

and should be able to know what masks are installed i f they changed any. This information could be used by the airlines to assist with their logistics planning for incorporating the AD, but should not be used as a mean s to not inspect the masks.

Based upon our recommended maintenance intervals define d in 174095-SIL-1 and the subsequent EASA SIB 2010-25, the airlines should be insp ecting these masks on a regular basis. We strongly recommend this action as a m eans to ensure the continued

airworthiness of the masks.

Sincerely,

Jon Maack Product Support Specialist BE Aerospace, Inc. Life Support Systems
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 85334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26811]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 7, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 113 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-70, CP2024-71.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-26811 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
January 20, 2005

26008

#### State v. Mitchell

Affirmed
25836

#### State v. Rita

Affirmed
#### State v. Gonsalves

25063

08/21/2003

Affirmed
Exhibit 32
                             LASERSIGHT INCORPORATED




      Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of LaserSight
Incorporated (the "Company") does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's
knowledge, that:

      1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
      period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



                                                   / S Danghui ("David") Liu
Dated: March 22, 2005
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                        Danghui ("David") Liu,
                                                        Chief Executive Officer



                                                    / S Dorothy M. Cipolla
Dated: March 22, 2005
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                          Dorothy M. Cipolla,
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

      The certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not
be deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in
any filing under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to LaserSight Incorporated
and will be retained LaserSight Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7053
BENJAMIN HENDERSON JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. SARGENT REYNOLDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE, its Teachers, Officers, Agents, Attorneys, Proxies, Employees, Affiliates; D. GUILLORY; EDWARD MURRAY; RON ANGELONE; JAMES S. GILMORE, III; DOUGLAS WI LDER; GEORGE F. ALLEN, Governor, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States Di strict Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-616-AM) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Henderson Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Benjamin Jones appeals from a district court order dismissinghis complaint without prejudice for failure to amend and particularize his complaint and denying his motions for default judgment and a temporary restraining order. We dismiss the appeal. The district court's dismissal order makes clear that Jones may save his complaint by amendment. Thus, this appeal of that order is interlocutory. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local 293 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993). Regarding the portion of the order denying Jones's request for a temporary restraining order, a request regarding facts unbound to the substance of the initial complaint, we find no extraordinary circumstances that would merit allowing an interlocutory appeal. Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc. , 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976). Thus, we dismiss Jones's appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
March 31, 2000

22872

#### State v. Calzada

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Legacy Notification Process

Last Modified: 

Print

This process was discontinued April 5, 2021.

As part of the revised regulations, the former notification process

was discontinued on April 5, 2021. 

All applications must now be submitted through the permitting process. APHIS will

process notifications it received on or before April 4, 2021, and acknowledged

notifications will remain effective until expiration. Applicants can check the status of

a notification at the link below.

Learn More About the Revised Regulations 

Status and Data Tables

Release Permits and Notifications

Movement Permits and Notifications

Download all BRS Permit and Notification data from ePermits in csv file (14.79

MB)

Download data documentation in pdf file (94.11 KB)

Download all BRS Permit and Notification data from APHIS eFile in csv file

(979.38 KB)
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.3





FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE
MOOG INC.
MANAGEMENT SHORT TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
(Effective as of September 29, 2017)
WHEREAS, Moog Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Moog Inc. Management Short Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan at any time; and
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan in certain respects.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective as of July 26, 2018, as follows:
1.The Plan is amended to add the following provisions at the end of the section entitled “Bonus Determinations”:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following provisions will apply solely with respect to the Plan Years beginning October 1, 2017 and September 30, 2018, respectively:
		
	•
	2018 Supplemental Bonus. With respect to the Plan Year beginning October 1, 2017, each eligible employee will be eligible to receive a “2018 Supplemental Bonus” in addition to any Bonus the eligible employee is otherwise eligible to receive for the Plan Year.  The decision to pay and the amount of any 2018 Supplemental Bonus, if any, will be in the sole discretion of the Committee.


		
	•
	2019 Bonus.  For the Plan Year beginning September 30, 2018, the Bonus an eligible employee will be eligible to receive for such Plan Year will equal the difference between (i) the Bonus the eligible employee would otherwise be entitled to receive for the Plan Year without regard to this provision, less (ii) the amount of any 2018 Supplemental Bonus paid to such eligible employee.  In no event will the Bonus for the Plan Year beginning on September 30, 2018 be less than zero.


2.The Plan is amended to add the following provision at the end of the section entitled “Time and Form of Payment”:
Any 2018 Supplemental Bonus will be paid following the end of the Plan Year beginning October 1, 2017, but in no event later than December 31, 2018.















3.In all other respects, the Plan remains unchanged.  
4.Any capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this First Amendment have the meaning set forth in the Plan.
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Company, through is duly authorized officer, adopts this First Amendment as of the effective date set forth above.




MOOG INC.




By: /s/ Paul Wilkinson
Title: Chief Human Resources Officer


031407.00003 Business 17449135v2


    
- 2 -
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 (the
“Report”), I, L’Sheryl D. Hudson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                   
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2017 |  | /s/ L’Sheryl D. Hudson                            
|                         |  | L’Sheryl D. Hudson
        Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No.’s 333-64094 and 333-64078) of Ceradyne, Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2004 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consentto the reference to us under the heading “Selected Financial Data” in such Form 10-K. 

 

 

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Orange County, California 

March 10, 2004
# C_2016202EN.01012701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/127

---

Article 174

(ex Article 158 TEC)

(ex Article 158 TEC)

In order to promote its overall harmonious development, the Union shall develop and pursue its actions leading to the strengthening of its economic, social and territorial cohesion.

In particular, the Union shall aim at reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions.

Among the regions concerned, particular attention shall be paid to rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps such as the northernmost regions with very low population density and island, cross-border and mountain regions.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XII, Ltd. at June 30, 1999, and its statement of income
for the six months then ended and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10-Q of CNL Income  Fund XII,  Ltd.  for the six months  ended June 30,
1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2,484,668
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  83,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,620
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         22,040,767
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,952,802
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40,474,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     39,332,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,474,487
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,032,823
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  443,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,854,112
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,854,112
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,854,112
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund XII,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>


</TABLE>
21541

#### State v. Wise

Affirmed
BARKETT, Circuit Judge, specially concurring: I concur because I believe this case is controlled by our precedent in United States v. Burke , 113 F.3d 211 (11 th Cir. 1997). However, I share some of the same reservations expressed by Judge Hill.
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the filing by Applied Energetics, Inc. (the “company”) of its
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
      2008
      (the “Report”) I, Kenneth M. Wallace, Chief Financial Officer of the company
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:






(i)
                the
                    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                    or 15(d) of
                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                    and




(ii)
                the
                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
                    the
                    company.




This
      certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Financial
      Officer of Applied Energetics, Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Applied Energetics, Inc. and will be retained by Applied Energetics, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




/s/
              Kenneth M.
              WallaceKenneth
              M. WallaceChief Financial
              Officer




Date:
      November 7, 2008