alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATIONS** **EXHIBIT 31.3**
I, Hamid R. Shokrgozar, certify that:
     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of White Electronic DesignsCorporation;
     2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;
     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;
     4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
      a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
      b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
      c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
      a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
      b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.
Date: February 7, 2005                                                 /s/Hamid R. Shokrgozar   Hamid R. Shokrgozar   Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judge McCl anahan, Senior Judges Coleman and Annunziata

CVS VIRGINIA DISTRIBUTION, INC. AND CVS CORP./GAB ROBINS NORTH AMERICA, INC. MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2417-05-2 PER CURIAM MARCH 21, 2006 JOYCE B. OWENS

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Michael P. Del Bueno; Whitt & Associates, on briefs), for appellants. (B. Mayes Marks, Jr.; Marks an d Associates, P.C., on brief), for appellee.

CVS Virginia Distribution, Inc. and its in surer appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that Joyce B. Owe ns (claimant) proved that her disability and medical treatment were causally related to her compensable August 27, 2001 injury by accident and that she was totally disabled during the periods from March 20, 2002 through August 12, 2002; June 9, 2003 through June 30, 2003, and September 16, 2003 and continuing. 1

We have reviewed the record and the commission ’s opinion and find that th is appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons st ated by the commission in its final opinion. See Owens v. CVS VA Distribution, Inc. , VWC File No. 207-00-29 (Sept. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal cont entions are adequately

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.

1 We note that while employer presented sevent een questions in its brief, all of those questions relate to the overri ding issues of causation and disa bility as determined by the commission.- 2 - presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid th e decisional process.

See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. We deny claimant’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to Code § 65.2-713. 2

Affirmed.

2 Claimant also cited Code § 65.2-524 in suppor t of her request for attorneys’ fees and costs. However, that code section is not applicab le to a request for attorn eys’ fees and costs as it pertains to the assessment of a penalty ag ainst an employer for failure to timely pay compensation.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Kenneth A. Myszkowski, Chief Financial Officer of Arrowhead Research Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 12, 2011



/s/ Kenneth A. MyszkowskiKenneth A. MyszkowskiChief Financial Officer


A signed original of these written statements required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Arrowhead Research Corporation and will be retained by Arrowhead Research Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.10


 





 


April 2, 2018


 


Ernest E. East


Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc.


133 E. Warm Springs Road


Suite 102


Las Vegas, Nevada 89119


 


Dear Ernie:


 


This letter agreement sets forth the mutual
understanding between Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) and yourself regarding a temporary change to
your employment agreement dated April 14, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”).


 


On February 15, 2018, the Company entered
into a letter of intent (“LOI”) with Great Elm Capital Group (“GEC”) for GEC to acquire all of the outstanding
stock of the Company (the “Transaction”). The LOI is subject to a number of contingency’s during a sixty (60)
day due diligence period including GEC’s completion of business, legal and tax reviews and execution of a definitive purchase
agreement and other documentation. GEC has indicated a desire to move forward expeditiously and has retained legal counsel and
other advisors to assist in its review and completion of the Transaction.


 


It is the judgment of the Board of Directors
and management of the Company that your participation on a full time basis is desirable to complete the Transaction. Accordingly,
we have requested and you have agreed to resume your previous duties as General Counsel of the Company of a full time basis until
completion of the Transaction, or notification by GEC that it no longer wishes to pursue the Transaction. During the term of your
temporary assignment:


 


		1:	Your title shall be Vice President, General Counsel and Compliance Officer of the Company;



 


		2:	Effective March 15, 2018 your annual salary shall be $225,000 per annum;



 


		3:	The vacation, fringe benefits performance bonuses and stock option provisions of your Employment Agreement shall remain the
same.



 


Upon closing, or termination, of the Transactions
your Employment Contract shall immediately go back into effect, except that your annual salary shall be $90,000 per annum, consistent
with the salary increase you were granted on January 1, 2016.


 


In addition, your Employment Contract and
this Agreement shall be construed by the laws of the State of Nevada and may not be amended without express written consent of
the parties hereto.


 


	 	Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By	 	 
	 	 	William J. Sherlock	 
	 	 	Chairman of the Board of Directors	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Agreed	 	 
	 	 	Ernest E. East	 


 


133
E. Warm Springs Road, Suite 102 Ÿ Las
Vegas, NV 89119 Ÿ P:
702.685.1000 Ÿ F:
702.685-1265
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**Certifications**
I, Timothy R. Eller, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Centex Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures [as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e)] for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedure to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.
Date: May 28, 2004
/s/ Timothy R. EllerTimothy R. Eller
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1863-1864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00175]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Middle Ear P50 
Review.
    Date: February 8, 2013.
    Time: 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 1864]]

    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Christine A. Livingston, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Institutes of Health/NIDCD, 6120 Executive Blvd.--MSC 7180, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-8683, [email protected].

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Chemical Senses 
Clinical Trial Review.
    Date: February 28, 2013.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Christine A. Livingston, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Institutes of Health/NIDCD, 6120 Executive Blvd.--MSC 7180, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-8683, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 3, 2013.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-00175 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01

                            Interpore International
                      Computations of Net Income Per Share
                     (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           YEAR  ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                 ------------------------------------------
                                                                   1996              1995             1994
                                                                  ------            ------           ------
<S>                                                               <C>               <C>              <C>
Net income                                                        $  658            $2,038           $2,412
                                                                  ======            ======           ======
Calculation of shares used in computing net income per share:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding                    6,996             6,752            6,562
     Weighted average convertible preferred stock                    166               454              581
     Common share equivalents outstanding                            306               329              425
                                                                  ------            ------           ------
Shares used in computing net income per share                      7,468             7,535            7,568
                                                                  ======            ======           ======
Net income per share                                              $  .09            $  .27           $  .32
                                                                  ======            ======           ======
</TABLE>
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SEVEN

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 340

(ex Article 288 TEC)

(ex Article 288 TEC)

The contractual liability of the Union shall be governed by the law applicable to the contract in question.

In the case of non-contractual liability, the Union shall, in accordance with the general principles common to the laws of the Member States, make good any damage caused by its institutions or by its servants in the performance of their duties.

Notwithstanding the second paragraph, the European Central Bank shall, in accordance with the general principles common to the laws of the Member States, make good any damage caused by it or by its servants in the performance of their duties.

The personal liability of its servants towards the Union shall be governed by the provisions laid down in their Staff Regulations or in the Conditions of Employment applicable to them.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 900 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to provide for congressional and 

State approval of national monuments and restrictions on the use of 

national monuments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2015 

Mr. LABRADOR (for himself, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. 

BENISHEK, Mr. COOK, Mr. GOSAR, and Mr. PEARCE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to provide for congressional and State approval of national monuments 

and restrictions on the use of national monuments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Monument 

5 Designation Transparency and Accountability Act of 

6 2015’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS. 

8 Section 320301 of title 54, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 900 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The Presi2 dent may’’ and inserting ‘‘After obtaining congres3 sional approval of the proposed national monument, 

4 certifying compliance with the National Environ5 mental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) 

6 with respect to the proposed national monument, 

7 and determining that the State in which the pro8 posed national monument is to be located has en9 acted legislation approving the designation of the 

10 proposed national monument, the President may’’; 

11 and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(e) RESTRICTIONS ON PUBLIC USE.—The Secretary 

14 shall not implement any restrictions on the public use of 

15 a national monument until the expiration of an appro16 priate review period (as determined by the Secretary) pro17 viding for public input and congressional approval.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### State v. Suka

16500

8/31/95

Denied

79 Hawai'i 293901 P.2d 1272
1

Frontiers in farm labor research

Steven Zahniser

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Economic Research Service

Presentation to USDA Fruit and Vegetable Industry Advisory Committee

Washington, DC, September 15, 2015

The opinions expressed are those of the presenter and do not necessary represent the views of the Economic

Research Service (ERS) or USDA.
2

More complete analysis of U.S. farm labor wage data

Sources: USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Farm Labor; 

and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Steven Zahniser

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Jan-01Jan-02Jan-03Jan-04Jan-05Jan-06Jan-07Jan-08Jan-09Jan-10Jan-11Jan-12Jan-13Jan-14Jan-15

Dollars per hour

Nominal

Inflationadjusted (July

2015 prices)

Analysis of wage data has focused 

primarily on national means

Wage differences within the 

occupation of hired farmworker are 

worthy of further exploration:

• Regional differences (Hertz and 

Zahniser, 2012)

• Analysis of extreme values 

(relevant to issue of “just food”)

The “Ginsu” challenge (1978) of small 

subsamples: “slices so thin your inlaws will never come back”
3

• Indispensible to understanding:

– Questions of justice and fairness in the Mexican labor market:

• Los Angeles Times (2015) documents use of coercive labor-retention technques by

some Mexican employers

• Environmental assessments revealing lack of adequate restroom facilities at certain

produce farms and packing facilities in the State of Puebla (Gerrity, 2015)

– Importance of Mexican labor to U.S. produce imports from Mexico: Mexico accounts for

about 14 percent of U.S. availiability of fresh or frozen produce

– Linkages between the Mexican labor market and the U.S. market for hired farm labor: 

Taylor, Charlton, Yúnez-Naude (2012) connect “The End of Farm Labor Abundance” in the

United States to socioeconomic developments in Mexico

• Few descriptive overviews of the Mexican market for hired farm labor:

– Zahniser and Treviño (2001) compare the U.S. and Mexican farm labor markets

• Possible explanations:

– Government data on this topic are limited or have not been fully utilized

– Academic efforts to collect such data are limited (Mexico National Rural Household 

Survey [EHRUM], conducted by Yúnez-Naude and Taylor, is a notable exception)

Data on the farm labor market in Mexico

Steven Zahniser
4

Every day, you’ll receive a chart of 

interest taken from ERS research! 

Charts of Note include a brief 

description, links to source material, 

and the ability to “like” it on your 

Facebook page.

Charts of Note from ERS

Sign up now to receive Charts of Note

in your email

www.ers.usda.gov/ChartsOfNote

Steven Zahniser
5

Thanks!

Steven Zahniser (zahniser@ers.usda.gov)

ERS website: www.ers.usda.gov

ERS information pages on Farm Labor: 

http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/farmlabor.aspx

ERS “In the News” pages on Immigration and the Rural 

Economy: http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/in-thenews/immigration-and-the-rural-workforce.aspx

Steven Zahniser