1882 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 9, 2013 / Notices 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determinations 

(‘‘IDs’’) (Order Nos. 6, and 8) granting 

(1) a motion by complainant Emerson 

Electric Co. of St. Louis, Missouri 

(‘‘Emerson’’) to partially terminate the 

investigation and (2) a motion to 

terminate the investigation based on 

withdrawal of the complaint. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amanda S. Pitcher, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2737. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on April 20, 2012, based on a complaint 

filed by Emerson of St. Louis, Missouri, 

alleging violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) by 

reason of (1) Infringement of the claim 

of U.S. Patent No. D535,850 (’850 

patent); (2) infringement of U.S. 

Trademark Registration No. 2,518,010 

and common law trademarks; (3) unfair 

competition by passing off; (4) 

trademark dilution; and (5) trade dress 

infringement. 77 FR 23751 (Apr. 20, 

2012). The Commission’s Notice of 

Investigation named Anaheim 

Manufacturing Co. of Brea, California as 

the only respondent. The Notice of 

Investigation was amended to add 

respondents Jiangsu Mega Motors and 

Zhjiang Zhongda Technical Export Co. 

Ltd. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was also named 

as a party. 

On November 28, 2012, Emerson filed 

a motion for partial termination with 

respect to Emerson’s allegations of 

infringement of the ’850 patent, 

trademark infringement by inducement, 

and trademark dilution. On December 3, 

2012, Emerson filed a letter 

supplementing its motion to state that 

there are no agreements among the 

parties concerning the subject matter of 

the investigation. On December 4, 2012, 

the ALJ granted Emerson’s motion, in 

Order No. 6, finding that there are no 

agreements, written or oral, express or 

implied between the parties concerning 

the investigation. In addition, the ALJ 

found that there are no extraordinary 

circumstances that would preclude 

granting the motion and that partial 

termination is in the public interest. 

On December 7, 2012, Emerson filed 

a motion to terminate the investigation 

based on withdrawal of the remaining 

allegations in the complaint and to stay 

the procedural schedule. On December 

11, 2012, the ALJ granted Emerson’s 

motion, in Order No. 8, finding that 

there are no agreements, written or oral, 

express or implied between the parties 

concerning the investigation. In 

addition, the ALJ found that there are no 

extraordinary circumstances that would 

preclude granting the motion and that 

termination of the investigation is in the 

public interest. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject IDs and to 

terminate the investigation. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

sections 210.42 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 3, 2013. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00178 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE 

UNITED STATES 

Hearings of the Judicial Conference 

Advisory Committee on Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure 

Federal Register Citation of Previous 

Announcements: 77 FR H9828. 

AGENCY: Advisory Committee on Rules 

of Bankruptcy Procedure, Judicial 

Conference of the United States. 

ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open 

Hearing. 

SUMMARY: The following public hearing 

on proposed amendments to the Federal 

Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been 

canceled: Bankruptcy Rules Hearing, 

February 1, 2013, Washington, DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benjamin J. Robinson, Deputy Rules 

Officer and Counsel, Administrative 

Office of the United States Courts, 

Washington, DC. 20544, telephone (202) 

502–1820. 

Dated: January 2, 2013. 

Notice of Meeting Cancellation. 

Benjamin J. Robinson, 

Rules Committee Deputy and Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00230 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 2210–55–P 

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE 

UNITED STATES 

Hearings of The Judicial Conference 

Advisory Committee on Rules of 

Appellate Procedure 

Federal Register Citation of Previous 

Announcement: 77FR 49828. 

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the 

United States, Advisory Committee on 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open 

Hearing. 

SUMMARY: The following public hearing 

on proposed amendments to the Federal 

Rules of Appellate Procedure has been 

canceled: Appellate Rules Hearing, 

February 1, 2013, Washington, DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benjamin J. Robinson, Deputy Rules 

Officer and Counsel, Administrative 

Office of the United States Courts, 

Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 

502–1820. 

Dated: January 2, 2013. 

Benjamin J. Robinson, 

Rules Committee Deputy and Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00233 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 2210–55–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed First 

Amendment to Consent Decree Under 

the Clean Air Act 

On January 2, 2013, the Department of 

Justice lodged a proposed first 

amendment to a consent decree with the 

United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Texas in the lawsuit 

entitled United States v. Formosa 

Plastics Corporation, Texas, et al., Civil 

Action No. 09–00061. 

Under the original 2010 consent 

decree, Formosa Plastics Corporation, 

Texas, Formosa Hydrocarbons, Inc. 

(collectively ‘‘FPC TX’’), and Formosa 

Plastics Corporation, Louisiana 

(collectively ‘‘Defendants’’) agreed to 

undertake numerous measures to come 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 9, 2013 / Notices 1883 

into compliance with various 

environmental statutes and regulations 

at their facilities in Point Comfort, 

Texas, and Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The 

Defendants still are in the process of 

complying with the 2010 Decree. 

However, at the Point Comfort Facility, 

FPX TX violated certain leak detection 

and repair (‘‘LDAR’’) provisions of the 

Decree (which are based on regulations 

promulgated under the Clean Air Act, 

42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.), and the United 

States and FPC TX agreed to a proposed 

first amendment to the Consent Decree. 

Under the proposed first amendment, 

FPC TX will undertake a comprehensive 

review of equipment such as valves, 

pumps, and compressors at the Point 

Comfort facility to determine the 

applicability of certain LDAR 

requirements and will pay a stipulated 

penalty of $1,447,925. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period of public comment on the first 

amendment. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and should refer to 

United States v. Formosa Plastics 

Corporation, Texas, et al., D.J. Ref. No. 

90–5–2–1–08995. All comments must be 

submitted no later than thirty (30) days 

after the publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By e-mail pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov 

By mail ..... Assistant Attorney General 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD 

P.O. Box 7611 

Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the first amendment may be examined 

and downloaded at this Department of 

Justice Web site: http://www.usdoj.gov/ 

enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. We will 

provide a paper copy of the first 

amendment upon written request and 

payment of reproduction costs. Please 

mail your request and payment to: 

Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ— 

ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check in the amount 

of $ 8.50 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00210 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Air 

Act 

On January 4, 2013, the Department of 

Justice lodged a proposed consent 

decree with the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of 

Wisconsin in the lawsuit entitled 

United States v. Wisconsin Public 

Service Corporation, Civ. No. 13–C–10 

(E.D. Wis.). 

In this civil enforcement action under 

the federal Clean Air Act, the United 

States alleges that Wisconsin Public 

Service Corporation (‘‘WPS’’) failed to 

comply with certain requirements of the 

Act intended to protect air quality. The 

complaint seeks injunctive relief and 

civil penalties for violations of the 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

(‘‘PSD’’) and Title V provisions of the 

Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7470–92 and 42 

U.S.C. 7661a–76661f, and related state 

and federal implementing regulations. 

The complaint alleges that WPS failed 

to obtain appropriate permits and failed 

to install and operate required pollution 

control devices to reduce emissions of 

various air pollutants at the Weston 

Generation Station, a coal-fired power 

plant in Marathon County, Wisconsin. 

The proposed consent decree would 

resolve past Clean Air Act violations 

and would require WPS to reduce 

harmful emissions of sulfur dioxide 

(‘‘SO2’’), nitrogen oxides (‘‘NOX’’), and 

particular matter (‘‘PM’’) emissions, at 

the Weston Generation Station, as well 

as the Pulliam Generation Station, a 

coal-fired power plant located in Brown 

County, Wisconsin. The reductions 

would be achieved through emission 

control requirements and limitations 

specified by the proposed consent 

decree, including installation and 

operation of pollution controls; 

retirement, refueling, or repowering of 

certain generating units; and annual 

emission caps at both the Weston and 

Pulliam plants. WPS will also spend $6 

million to fund environmental 

mitigation projects that will further 

reduce emissions and benefit 

communities adversely affected by 

pollution from its plants, and pay a civil 

penalty of $1.2 million. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

proposed consent decree. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and should 

refer to United States v. Wisconsin 

Public Service Corporation, Civ. No. 13– 

C–10 (E.D. Wis.), D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2– 

1–1230/1. All comments must be 

submitted no later than thirty (30) days 

after the publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By e-mail pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov. 

By mail ..... Assistant Attorney General 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD 

P.O. Box 7611 

Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the proposed consent decree may be 

examined and downloaded at this 

Justice Department Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide 

a paper copy of the proposed consent 

decree upon written request and 

payment of reproduction costs. Please 

mail your request and payment to: 

Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ— 

ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $19.00 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00232 Filed 1–8–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed Partial 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Water 

Act 

Notice is hereby given that on January 

3, 2013, a proposed partial Consent 

Decree (‘‘Decree’’) was lodged in U.S. v. 

BP Exploration and Production, et al, 

Civil No. 10–4536 (E.D. La.) (That case 

is centralized in MDL 2179: In Re: Oil 

Spill by the Oil Rig ‘‘Deepwater 

Horizon’’ in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 

20, 2010.) 

In this civil enforcement action the 

United States sought, among other 

things, civil penalties under Section 

311(b) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 

1321(b), from the ‘‘Transocean 

Defendants’’ (Transocean Deepwater 

Inc., Transocean Offshore Deepwater 

Drilling Inc., Transocean Holdings LLC, 

and Triton Asset Leasing GmbH). That 

claim arises against the Transocean 

Defendants, and other defendants as 

well, from the discharge of oil into the 

Gulf of Mexico resulting from the 

blowout of the Macondo Well that began 

in April 2010. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with