alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Maimonides, Relief Portrait
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Brenda Putnam

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1950

Location
      
House Chamber

Maimonides (1135-1204) Jewish philosopher of Cordova, Spain. Compiled a systematic exposition of the whole of Jewish law as contained in the Pentateuch and in Talmudic literature.

The 23 marble relief portraits over the gallery doors of the House Chamber in the U.S. Capitol depict historical figures noted for their work in establishing the principles that underlie American law. They were installed when the chamber was remodeled in 1949-1950. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
18553

#### State v. Makaila

Affirmed
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Timothy Sherlock, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Vice President of Finance ofARI Network Services, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated: December 15, 2006   /s/ Timothy Sherlock     Timothy Sherlock  Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and VP of Finance
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00002-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.S.

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-PA-00206

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order terminating 

appellant’s parental rights is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs of appeal be taxed against 

appellant as he qualifies as indigent. 

James Peplinski’s motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED.

SIGNED April 15, 2015. 

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 15, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00733

- CR

Martinz BALLEZA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR12645

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant ’s brief was due February 27, 2019, but was not filed. This court notified

appellant ’ s counsel of the deficiency on March 4, 2019

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2).

Appellant has not filed the brief or a motion requesting an extension of time.

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file his brief in this court on or before April 15,

2019

. If the brief is not filed on or before the date ordered, we will abate this appeal and remand

the case to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether appellant or his counsel has

abandoned the appeal.

We further order the clerk of this court to serve this order on counsel by first class

United States mail and by certified mail, return receipt requested, with delivery restricted to

addressee only, or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of March, 2019

.___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1155

TEWODROS G. ABAYNEH, Petitioner,

v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted: October 16, 2008 Decided: November 17, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Solomon Bekele, LAW OFFICES OF SOLOMON & ASSOCIATES, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Paul T. Cygnarowicz, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Tewodros G. Abayneh, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for relief from removal. Abayneh first challenges the determination that he failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Abayneh fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Abayneh cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal.

Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v.

Cardoza-Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Finally, we uphold the finding below that Abayneh failed to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that he w ould be tortured if removed to Ethiopia. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

23 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.45


Description of the Fiscal 2018 Annual Incentive Plan
The Compensation Committee (the "Compensation Committee") of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Black Box Corporation (the "Company") recommended that the Board approve, and the Board approved, an annual incentive bonus plan (the "FY18 Annual Incentive Plan") under the Black Box Corporation 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the "2008 Plan"), for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018 ("Fiscal 2018"). The performance goals for the FY18 Annual Incentive Plan are, as defined below, "adjusted operating margin," "organic revenue" and "working capital/revenues." 


"Adjusted operating margin" means operating income plus "Reconciling Items" (as defined below); "organic revenue" means revenue excluding the impact of currency changes and the impact of acquisitions or dispositions; and "working capital/revenues” means certain current assets minus certain current liabilities divided by revenue.


"Reconciling Items" means: (i) amortization of intangible assets, (ii)  variance to budget (operating and depreciation) related to the ERP migration as approved by the Board in December 2016, (iii) restructuring expenses and (iv) for each of the following items, unplanned amounts from: (a) any non-recurring or unusual item with a cost in excess of $100,000, (b) asset write-up depreciation, (c) acquisition-related expenses, (d) the impact of expenses, settlements, judgments and fines associated with material legal matters ($500,000 or greater per matter), (e) the effect of changes in tax laws or accounting principles affecting results and (f) asset impairment.  


The performance goals for the FY18 Annual Incentive Plan are weighted as follows: adjusted operating margin and working capital/revenues each at 30% and organic revenue at 40%. Payouts range from 50% to 200% of targeted annual bonus depending upon the level of performance. Costs/benefits incurred due to unplanned projects will not impact achievement of numbers.


The Compensation Committee retained negative discretion to decrease the amount of any award earned under the FY18 Annual Incentive Plan. 


The FY18 Annual Incentive Plan provides for certain quarterly payments. The fourth quarter payment will not be made under the FY18 Annual Incentive Plan if the Company’s adjusted operating margin percentage is below a minimum targeted amount.
### -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/01 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
143 P.3d 48

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### Kina v. Hawaii Medical Service Ass'n

26341

09/05/2006

Vacated & remanded
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 93 

To prohibit United States Government recognition of Russia’s annexation 

of Crimea. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself and Mr. CHABOT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit United States Government recognition of 

Russia’s annexation of Crimea. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crimea Annexation 

5 Non-recognition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST UNITED STATES RECOGNI7 TION OF RUSSIA’S ANNEXATION OF CRIMEA. 

8 (a) STATEMENT OF POLICY.—It is the policy of the 

9 United States not to recognize the de jure or de facto sovVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:40 Jan 10, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H93.IH H93

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 93 IH

1 ereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea, its air2 space, or its territorial waters. 

3 (b) PROHIBITION.—In accordance with subsection 

4 (a), no Federal department or agency may take any action 

5 or extend any assistance that recognizes or implies rec6 ognition of the de jure or de facto sovereignty of the Rus7 sian Federation over Crimea, its airspace, or its territorial 

8 waters. 

9 (c) WAIVER.—The President may waive subsection 

10 (a) or (b) if the President determines that it is vital to 

11 the national security interests of the United States to do 

12 so. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-8 (No. 333-79547) of Bridgford Foods Corporation of our report dated January 27, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 27, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

**/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**

**Orange County, California**

**January 27, 2005**
## FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 04/15/99 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

___________________________ No. 97-9229

___________________________

D. C. Court No. 4:96-Cv-5-DF D. LISA CLOVER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

___________________________ (April 15, 1999) Before CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge. O R D E R: The opinion in the above-styled case, which is currently published at 157 F.3d 824 (11 th Cir. 1998), is VACATED, and the case is resubmitted to the court for a decision.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 20, 2015

No. 04-13-00106-CV

Barry BROOKS, Heston C. King, Stefen Douglas Brooks, Johanna Barton, and Jesse Rodriguez 

Benavides,

Appellants

v.

EXCELLENCE MORTGAGE, LTD.,

Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-01173

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On April 13, Appellee Excellence Mortgage filed Appellee’s Unopposed First Motion for 

Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing. The motion is hereby GRANTED. Appellee’s 

motion for rehearing is due to be filed no later than May 18, 2015.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.1**
*CERTIFICATIONS*
I, Brian E. Dearing, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report.
Date: June 14, 2005         By:                    /s/ Brian E. Dearing   By:Brian E. Dearing Title:   Chairman, President and CEO   This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jerrold J. Pellizzon, Chief Financial Officer of Ceradyne, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Ceradyne, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b. [paragraph b. is omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]



c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        
|------------------------
|Dated: February 3, 2005 
|                        
|/s/ JERROLD J. PELLIZZON
|Jerrold J. Pellizzon    
|Chief Financial Officer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Edward Clark Portrait
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1974

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

Edward Clark, the longest-serving architect to date (1865-1902), completed the porticoes of the new wing extensions and oversaw construction of the first Library of Congress building (now named the Jefferson building).

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. Cox first executed the murals in the eastern north-south corridor, starting work in 1973 and finishing in 1974. Portraits of the nine men who served as Architect of the Capitol between 1793 and 1974 decorate the groined vaults of the ceilings. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### 41st Street Building Corporation, Appellant, *v.*George Rothenberg et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 8, 1959.

*621*Finhelstein, Benton <& Soil (Seymour Hosore*of counsel), for appellant.

*George Rothenberg,*respondent in person, and for others, respondents.

*Jacob 1. Polstein,*respondent in person.

*Herbert M. Fern,*respondent in person.

*Per Curiam.*

The facts here indicate an intention on the part of the landlord and the tenant that tenant’s right to sublet and to replace any tenancy which existed at the time of the execution of the lease should be an integral part of the contract.

In order to obtain this right, necessary to the use to which tenant put the space in question with full knowledge and consent of the landlord, tenant agreed to a 50% rent increase from $1,800 to $2,700 per annum.

Under the circumstances here, in view of the clear intention of the parties as evidenced by the particular clause in the lease giving the tenant the right to sublet or replace any tenancy, and as further evidenced by the conduct of the parties up to the time that the controversy between them arose, it is fair to conclude that the right of the tenant to sublet was projected into the statutory tenancy.

The final order should be affirmed, with $25 costs.

Concur — Heoht, J. P., Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Final order affirmed, etc.