alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4


 


Letter
of Commitment


 


	Promiser:	Aerkomm
Inc.
	 	Aerkomm
Taiwan Inc.



 


	I.	For
                                         the land located at No. 89-49 Dashuiku Section, Xinyi District, Keelung City (the area
                                         is 7,690.46 Pyeong, approximately 273,651 square feet, all parts thereof are held, the
                                         original land number is 89-18, and it is changed to 89-49 as a result of the reorganization
                                         by the land office, and the area and location remain unchanged), the landowner TSAI MING-YIN
                                         agrees to sign a real estate sales contract with the promiser in respect of the above
                                         subject property at a total price of NT$ (the same below) One Billion Five Thousand Six
                                         Hundred Twenty-nine Million Seven Thousand Five Hundred and Seven Dollars (NT$1,056,297,507,
                                         approximately US$34,712,373) through the agent Metro Investment Group Limited, and the
                                         Promiser agrees to pay the agent commission to Metro Investment Group Limited.
	 	 



	II.	Terms
                                         of payment: If Metro Investment Group Limited smoothly facilitates the completion of
                                         the above real estate sales contract, the Promiser shall pay the agent a commission based
                                         on four percent (4%) of the full contract price (NT$1,056,297,507, approximately US$34,712,373),
                                         which equivalent to NT$42,252,900 (approximately US$1,388,528), to Metro Investment Group
                                         Limited.
	 	 



	III.	Time
                                         of payment: Ninety (90) days from the completion of signing of the sales contract and
                                         full payment of the contract price by the Promiser.
	 	 



	IV.	In
                                         the event of any delay in payment, the Promiser shall pay an additional punitive liquidated
                                         damages of one tenth of one percent (0.1%) per day of the agent commission per day. The
                                         punitive liquidated damages shall be limited to 5% of the agent commission.
	 	 



	V.	Jurisdiction:
                                         In the event of any lawsuit arising out of this Letter of Commitment, both parties agree
                                         to take Taiwan Taipei District Court as the court of first instance with jurisdiction.



 


Yours
sincerely,


 


Metro
Investment Group Limited


 


	Promiser: Aerkomm Inc.	/s/ Jeffrey Wun	 
	Legal Representative:	Jeffrey Wun, 

CEO	 
	 	 	 
	Aerkomm Taiwan Inc.	/s/ Aerkomm
    Taiwan Inc. (Corporate Seal)	 
	Legal Representative:	HSU, CHIH-MING /s/ Hsu, Chih-Ming (Personal Seal)	 




 


The
10th day of July, 2018
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1636

JAMES P. MIXON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HENRY C. MORGAN, Judge,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-00-300-2)

Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 20, 2000

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James P. Mixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 338 (1971).

2

PER CURIAM:

James P. Mixon, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Bivens* action. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mixon

v. Morgan, No. CA-00-300-2 (E.D. Va. May 2, 2000). We deny Mixon’s

Motion for a Fast and Speedy Trial. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      11,352,961
<SECURITIES>                                    35,307
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,535,198
<PP&E>                                       9,242,341
<DEPRECIATION>                             (7,796,781)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,192,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,496,351
<BONDS>                                        595,448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,100,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,192,758
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,670,990
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               922,742
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                722,747
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            722,747
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   722,747
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply491Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Karen K Wilt (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 13, 2021 - 12:47pmI have been watching the Impeachment trail also.  I admired the clock and wanted to know how old it was.  It is stunning and keeping time correctly.  It is wonderful that we still have the older clocks and furniture in our government buildings.  Things to cherish.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6993
BARRY LAW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LINDA LILLY, City Insurance (Division of Risk); DAVID TORBORG, Insurance Coordination, City of Danville; MAJOR COLEMAN, Danville Jail; SERGEANT CHILDRESS, Danville Jail, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-449-R) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry Law, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, dismissing the action because it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1997), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Law v. Lilly , No. CA-97-449-R (W.D. Va. July 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
20115

#### Greff v. Yukimura

Affirmed
**Exhibit 10.1**
**Payment of Deferred Compensation**
     This Agreement is entered into as of April 2, 2004, by and between ARINetwork Services, Inc. (“ARI”) and the undersigned participant (the“Participant”) in ARI’s 1999 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”).
     WHEREAS, effective January 1, 1999, Participant was granted a SalaryIncrease (as defined in the Plan), which Salary Increase was required to bedeferred under the Plan until the Payment Date (as defined in the Plan).
     WHEREAS, through March 20, 2004, the aggregate Deferred Amount (as definedin the Plan) payable by ARI to Participant under the Plan with respect to suchSalary Increase is set forth below the Participant’s signature;
     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of ARI has authorized the payout of theDeferred Amount, half in cash and half in stock;
     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
     1. Payouts by ARI. Promptly following the effective date hereof, ARIshall pay to Participant, in cash, one-half of the Deferred Amount.Participant agrees to accept, in lieu of cash, and ARI agrees to deliver toParticipant, shares of ARI common stock for the remaining half of the DeferredAmount. The number of whole shares of stock that ARI shall issue toParticipant shall be one-half of the Deferred Amount divided by the average ofthe closing bid and asked prices of ARI common stock on April 2, 2004. ARIshall pay cash in lieu of fractional shares. Upon such payouts, ARI shall bereleased from any further liability or obligation owed to Participant under thePlan.
     2. Termination of Further Deferrals. Effective with the beginning of thecurrent pay period, March 21, 2004, the Salary Increase granted to Participantin 1999 shall no longer be deferred under the Plan and Participant’s cashcompensation will increase as a result.
     3. Investment Representations. Participant represents that he isacquiring the ARI common stock issued pursuant to paragraph 1 for his ownaccount for investment purposes only and not with a present intent toward thepublic sale or distribution thereof. Participant agrees that the shares maynot be transferred unless such transaction is exempt in ARI’s sole judgementfrom registration under applicable federal and state securities laws, and thecertificates representing the shares will bear a customary restrictive legend.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have exercised this Agreement as ofthe date first above written.     ARI Network Services, Inc. /s/ Brian Dearing   Participant Signature     By: /s/ Timothy SherlockTimothy Sherlock,
##### 



Exhibit 32.3 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Quarterly Report of Goodys Family Clothing, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David
G. Peek, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ David G. Peek David G. Peek
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
November 17, 2004
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF

AFRICAN

- AMERICAN OWNED MEDIA,

a California limited liability company;

ENTERTAINMENT STUDIOS

NETWORKS, INC., a California

corporation,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, a

Pennsylvania corporation,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 16

- 56479

D.C. No.

2:15

- cv

- 01239

- TJH

- MAN

ORDER *

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Before: SCHROEDER, M. SMITH, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

On March 23, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court granted Appellant’s petition for

certiorari, vacated our memorandum disposition filed November 19, 2018, and

remanded f

or further consideration in light of Comcast Corp . v. National Assn. of

African American

- Owned Media , 589 U. S. ___ (2020)

. We hereby VACATE the

district court’s decision and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3. 

# FILED

MAY 7 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

Comcast

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

October 9, 2019

Order 

Clerk

October 9, 2019

160120(43)

MARY ELIZABETH ZELASKO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 160120

v COA: 342854

Oakland CC: 2011-788549-DM

RICHARD ANTHONY ZELASKO,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time for 

filing her answer is GRANTED. The answer submitted on October 1, 2019, is accepted as 

timely filed.
26959

#### State v. Medeiros

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Anthony R. Moore, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ ANTHONY R. MOORE                             
|                    |  |  |  | Anthony R. Moore Chairman Chief Executive Officer



30
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18
             UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AMTROL Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Larry T.
Guillemette, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to Title 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

            1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2005                         By: /s/ LARRY T. GUILLEMETTE
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Larry T. Guillemette,
                                                 Executive Vice President, Chief
                                                 Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          8,684 
<SECURITIES>                                   16,256 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  46,112 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               79,051       
<PP&E>                                         36,597      
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,237    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                162,712      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,648    
<BONDS>                                        62,305  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                           61 
<OTHER-SE>                                     69,524       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  162,712         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               41,948          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  87,555          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                508       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (45,565)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,631      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (47,196)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                 (47,196) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (2.03) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.02) 
        

</TABLE>
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
James Shields Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Leonard W. Volk

Materials
    Bronze

Year
    1893

Location
      
Hall of Columns

This statue of James Shields was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Illinois in 1893.

James Shields, born on May 12, 1806, emigrated from Ireland as a young man. Before settling in America he had numerous adventures as a sailor; he decided to settle in the United States after his legs were broken in a rigging accident in New York City. The enterprising youth eventually settled in Kaskaskia, the capital of the Illinois Territory. He taught school, studied law and was admitted to practice.

He served in the Illinois House of Representatives in 1836, became the state auditor in 1839, and was a member of the Supreme Court of Illinois from 1843 to 1845. While serving in the Illinois House, Shields met Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas. Lincoln was a Whig and Shields was a Democrat; the two clashed rhetorically and once even scheduled a duel. Shields served in the Mexican War and was injured in the Battle of Cheruhisco. He served briefly as governor of the Oregon Territory before being elected to the U.S. Senate, where he represented Illinois for one term. Defeated for re-election, he then moved to Minnesota, where he served from 1858 to 1859 as one of the first senators from that state. During the Civil War Shields served as a brigadier general with the Union Army.

After the war he continued his active political life. He was a member of the Missouri legislature and served as senator from Missouri in 1879, thus becoming the only senator to have represented three states. He died in office on June 1, 1879. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe