alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BALJIT SINGH SANGA, a.k.a. Baljit

Singh Sangha,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70459

Agency No. A031-129-576

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Baljit Singh Sanga, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for a waiver of

inadmissibility under former section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality

FILED

MAR 24 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70459

Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (repealed 1996). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings and review de novo

questions of law. Abebe v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 1037, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2005) (en

banc). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not err in failing to consider Indian law. As the BIA

recognized, in denying relief the IJ relied upon the inconsistencies in Sanga’s

testimony regarding how his second marriage was terminated, not on whether

Sanga’s second marriage was actually terminated under Indian law. Moreover, the

question of what Indian law provides is a question of fact that the BIA could not

consider on appeal. See Matter of Kodwo, 24 I. & N. Dec. 479, 482 (BIA 2008).

Contrary to Sanga’s contention, the BIA provided an adequate explanation

for its decision. The BIA cited Matter of Burbano, 20 I. & N. Dec. 872 (BIA

1994), and did not express disagreement with any part of the IJ’s decision, and

thereby adopted the IJ’s decision in its entirety, including the IJ’s explanation for

denying Sanga relief. See Abebe, 432 F.3d at 1039-40.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary denial of relief

under former section 212(c) unless the petitioner raises a “colorable” question of

law or a constitutional question. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii), (D); VargasHernandez v. Gonzales, 497 F.3d 919, 921, 923 (9th Cir. 2007). Sanga’s
3 09-70459

contention that substantial evidence does not support the finding that he perjured

himself raises a question of fact, Damaize-Job v. INS, 787 F.2d 1332, 1338 (9th

Cir. 1986) (credibility is a factual finding), as does Sanga’s contention that the

agency failed to consider the totality of the evidence in denying him relief. 

Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review these contentions. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii), (D); Vargas-Hernandez, 497 F.3d at 923. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Certification

+ Oversight

Conservation 

Resources

Data +

Research

Farming

Resources

Market 

Promotion

Statistical Surveys 

and Data: NASS

Commodity-Specific 

Production and Price 

Data: AMS Market 

News

Research to Advance 

Organic Farming: 

USDA

Trade and Export Data 

Analysis: FAS

Conservation for Soil 

Health, Pest and Weed 

Management, and 

Pollinators: NRCS

Conservation 

Management and 

Practice Assistance: 

NRCS

Conservation Reserve 

Program: FSA

Climate Resources: 

USDA

Transitioning to 

Organic: NOP

Get Certified: NOP

Organic Certification 

Cost Share Assistance: 

FSA

Find an Organic 

Operation/Ingredient: 

NOP

Learn About USDA 

Organic: NOP

Farm Loans: FSA

Crop Insurance: RMA

Business Loans and 

Grants for Rural 

Communities: RD

High Tunnels: NRCS

Farmers.gov Online 

Community: USDA

Local Food, Farmers 

Market, and Market 

Access Programs: 

AMS

Local and Regional 

Food Sector: AMS

Urban, Indoor, and 

Emerging Ag Grant 

Programs: NIFA

NOP: National Organic Program | FSA: Farm Service Agency | NRCS: Natural Resources Conservation Service | USDA: U.S. Department of Agriculture | NASS: National Agricultural Statistics Service | 

AMS: Agricultural Marketing Service | FAS: Foreign Agricultural Service | RMA: Risk Management Agency | RD: Rural Development | NIFA: National Institute of Food and Agriculture

How does USDA support organic farms & businesses?

USDA helps farmers with organic certification guidance, biodiversity and natural resources 

conservation, financial and production assistance and marketing. Whether you’re already certified 

organic, considering transition, or working with organic producers, we have resources for you.

Visit: www.usda.gov/organic
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

OBAYDULLAH, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Civil Case No. 08-1173 (RJL) 

) 

) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

~ FINAL JUDGMENT 

(November~, 2010) 

For the reasons set forth in this Court's public Memorandum Order of October 19, 

2010 and for the reasons set forth in this Court's Classified Memorandum Opinion of 

November 24, 2010, it is hereby 

ORDERED that Petitioner Obaydullah's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is 

DENIED. 

SO ORDERED.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch The Architect's Virtual Capitol
Expecting the Capitol.gov site? We've moved!
Try the links below to find what you're looking for, or use our search feature above.
        
    
      Discover

Find out more about our agency, our employees and our work.

Who We Are | Watch Videos
          Explore

Tour the different areas of the campus that we care for.

Discover Buildings & Grounds | Map of the Capitol Campus
          Learn

Read on for history, trivia and the stories behind the people, art, history and grounds of the U.S. Capitol.

Capitol Hill Facts | Our Blog
Why does the Statue of Freedom face east, away from the National Mall?

        
The Capitol's East Front was planned, and still serves, as its principal entrance (being the only front on level ground), and the statue faces those who arrive from this direction.

    
      Image
    Graphic for Architect of the Capitol Family Resources: Home Activities, Virtual Tours, Videos.

Virtual Resources

Want to Visit Us From Home?

The Architect of the Capitol is delivering virtual Capitol experiences such as field trips, exhibits, videos and student activities.

Virtual Resources Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
May 26, 2004

25212

#### Ferreira v. Bittan

Affirmed
November 19, 1997

18966

#### State by Bronster v. Pettigrew

Vacated and Remanded
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 219 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 219

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 22, 2015.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Takai.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Director, Principal and Principal Executive Officer of C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.



|                  | Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.
|----------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|Date:             |                                        
|February 20, 2004 | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |
Exhibit
32.2










Section
906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer







I,
Jerrold J. Pellizzon, Chief Financial Officer of Ceradyne, Inc. (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section Section 1350, that:







(1)
    the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and






(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.







Dated:
      February 23, 2010/s/ Jerrold J. PellizzonJerrold
      J. PellizzonChief
      Financial
Officer
27129

#### Wilton v. State

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1995
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         890,683
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  501,859
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,392,542
<PP&E>                                      17,687,325
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,553,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,526,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,938
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,459,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,526,521
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,386,883
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,168,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,218,520
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 3333 HOLDING
CORPORATION'S MARCH 31, 2000, FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000818762
<NAME> 3333 HOLDING CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              16
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,013
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             191
<DEPRECIATION>                                      94
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,960)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,023
<SALES>                                            607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   607
<CGS>                                            1,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,127)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,127)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
24339

#### State v. Jess

Affirmed
28456

#### State v. Tunoa

Affirmed
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 231 (Monday, December 4, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 84182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26559]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18061 and #18062; Hawaii Disaster Number HI-
00073]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Hawaii

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Correction to amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a correction to the amendment of the Presidential 
declaration of a major disaster for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-4724-DR), 
dated 08/10/2023.
    Incident: Wildfires, including High Winds.
    Incident Period: 08/08/2023 through 09/30/2023.

DATES: Issued on 11/27/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/11/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/10/2024.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Hawaii, dated 08/10/2023, is hereby 
corrected to reflect the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 12/11/2023.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-26559 Filed 12-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
#### Engelstad v. City & County

16076

11/14/96

Vacated and Remanded
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P (the "Fund");

1. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
3. The Fund's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and we have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Fund, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Fund's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date (the "Evaluation Date") within 45 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report; and
3. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



1. The Fund's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Fund's auditors and the audit committee of the Fund's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



1. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Fund's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Fund's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Fund's internal controls; and



1. The Fund's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|Date:November20, 2003 | _/s/ John P. Manning
|--------------------- | --------------------
|                      | John P. Manning     
|                      | Director, President 
|                      | (Principal Executive
|                      | Officer), C&M       
|                      | Management Inc.;    
|                      |
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 92 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 92

   To provide that rates of pay for Members of Congress shall not be 
adjusted under section 601(a)(2) of the Legislative Reorganization Act 
 of 1946 in the year following any fiscal year in which outlays of the 
         United States exceeded receipts of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2015

  Mr. Buchanan (for himself, Mrs. Black, and Mr. Yoho) introduced the 
     following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
   Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and 
 Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that rates of pay for Members of Congress shall not be 
adjusted under section 601(a)(2) of the Legislative Reorganization Act 
 of 1946 in the year following any fiscal year in which outlays of the 
         United States exceeded receipts of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE LEGISLATIVE REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1946.

    (a) In General.--Section 601(a)(2) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 4501(2)) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(C) An adjustment in rates of pay may be made under this 
paragraph in a year only if the aggregate outlays of the United States 
during the last completed fiscal year did not exceed the aggregate 
receipts of the United States during such fiscal year, as determined by 
the Congressional Budget Office.''.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Section 601(a)(2)(A) of such Act (2 
U.S.C. 4501(2)(A)) is amended by striking ``Subject to subparagraph 
(B),'' and inserting ``Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C),''.
                                 <all>
```