alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed, March 18, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-01031-CV

____________

ARSENIO CANTU, Appellant

V.

VERONICA PENA, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1017967

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 5, 2013. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Karen Field, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
28453

#### State v. Elliston

Affirmed
April 02, 2016

Manager, Flight Standards Service

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office

FAA Headquarters, Building 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Re: Petition to Amend Exemption No. 14120 to Regulatory Docket No FAA-2015-4602 in order 

that Cochise Aerial Perspective LLC (CAP) be permitted to conduct the following additional 

operations other than those previously outlined in said original exemption:

Attention: FAA UAS Integration Office

Cochise Aerial Perspective LLC respectfully requests the addition of the following operations to 

our Exemption No.14120:

To operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial photography, videography, and 

cinematography for inspections of bridges, flare stacks, utility-power generation systems, 

patrolling, filmmaking, agriculture, wildlife and forestry monitoring, surveying construction sites

and land development, video and live feed to assist with search and rescue, special events, 

mining, television, closed-set filming, and demonstration flights. CAP’s existing safety standards 

and procedures as outlined in our Flight Operation & Procedures Manual (FOPM) will continue 

with the addition of any aforementioned operations. Furthermore, we will follow the

recommended maintenance and operations parameters as outlined by UAV manufactures for any 

and all UAS platforms used for said operations. Please do not hesitate to contact me at the phone 

number or via the e-mail address provided above should you have any questions or concerns.

Respectfully submitted,

Michael Drake

Member

Cochise Aerial Perspective LLC

2457 East Kalispell Ave

Sierra Vista, AZ 85650

Email: pir84lifearg@gmail.com; phone: (520) 255-3776

Michael Drake

Owner

Cochise Aerial Perspective LLC

2457 East Kalispell Ave.

Sierra Vista, AZ 85650

(520) 255-3776

pir84lifearg@gmail.com
April 15, 2004

25155

#### Pacheco v. State

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply624Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  John St.Onge (... (not verified)PermalinkMay 21, 2019 - 5:30pmGreat information. Many thanks. _x000D_
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
CONTACTS:

Stacy Kika (News Media Only)

kika.stacy@epa.gov

202-564-0906

202-564-4355

Dolores Wesson (Public Inquiries)

wesson.dolores@epa.gov

202-564-9085

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

June 17, 2010

TODAY: Advisory Group Releases Report on

Addressing Environmental Challenges Along the 

U.S. – Mexico Border

WASHINGTON – The Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB), an independent presidential 

advisory committee to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is holding a press conference on 

the release of the report, “A Blueprint for Action on the US - Mexico Border.” The report develops 

recommendations to address challenges along the U.S. – Mexico border. Michelle DePass, assistant 

administrator for EPA’s Office of International and Tribal Affairs, will join Nancy Sutley, chair of the 

Council on Environmental Quality, at the press conference to receive the recommendations and discuss

maintaining a strong international relationship with Mexico as both countries move forward in addressing 

the human health and environmental challenges along the border. A roundtable discussion on the federal, 

state, and local stakeholder perspective will be held immediately following the press conference.

 

WHO: Nancy Sutley, chair of the Council on Environmental Quality

Michelle DePass, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of International and Tribal 

Affairs

Paul Ganster, chair of the Good Neighbor Environmental Board

WHAT: Press conference and roundtable discussion

WHEN: Today, June 17, 2010, 3 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. EDT

WHERE: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (Fifth-floor conference room) 

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center 

One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 

1300 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004

More information on Good Neighbor Environmental Board: http://www.epa.gov/ocem/gneb

To view the webcast: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/mexico

Note: You will not be able to view the webcast until 3 p.m. EDT

R215
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 217 

Honoring the life and accomplishments of Henry Thomas Segerstrom and 

expressing condolences on his passing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2015 

Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and accomplishments of Henry Thomas 

Segerstrom and expressing condolences on his passing. 

Whereas Henry Thomas Segerstrom was born in the city of 

Santa Ana, California, on April 5, 1923, to a family of 

Swedish immigrant farmers; 

Whereas Henry Thomas Segerstrom left his studies at Stanford University after the attacks on Pearl Harbor in 

1941 in order to enlist in the Army to fight for his country; 

Whereas Henry Thomas Segerstrom attained the Army rank 

of Captain, was wounded in action in the Battle of the 

Bulge in 1944, and was awarded the Purple Heart; 

Whereas Henry Thomas Segerstrom completed his Bachelors 

of Arts at Stanford while recuperating from his combat 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 217 IH 

wounds and subsequently earned his Master of Business 

Administration from the Stanford Graduate School of 

Business; 

Whereas Henry Thomas Segerstrom helped develop the world 

renowned South Coast Plaza in Costa Mesa, California, 

into the highest grossing retail center in the United 

States with annual sales in excess of $1.7 billion; 

Whereas Henry Thomas Segerstrom helped spearhead the 

creation of the Orange County Performing Arts Center 

and played a direct role in bringing the arts to Orange 

County; 

Whereas Henry Thomas Segerstrom left a legacy of dedication and leadership to his community and helped transform a largely agricultural region into a multiethnic and 

thriving center of art, culture, innovation, entrepreneurship, technology, and business leadership; 

Whereas Henry Thomas Segerstrom served his community by 

serving on the board of numerous institutions including 

the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles, Southern California Edison, and the American Friends of 

Versailles, and served as the chairman of the Orange 

County Water District board; 

Whereas Henry Thomas Segerstrom passed away on February 20, 2015, at the age of 91, and is survived by his 

wife Elizabeth and his children, Andrea, Toren, and 

Anton, their spouses, 6 grandchildren, and 7 great-grandchildren; and 

Whereas Henry Thomas Segerstrom’s life of hard work, selfsacrifice, and philanthropic efforts brought wealth and 

culture to Southern California, is nationally recognized, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 217 IH 

and commended, and he will never be forgotten: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the life and accomplishments of 

3 Henry Thomas Segerstrom; and 

4 (2) extends heartfelt sympathies and condo5 lences to the family of Henry Thomas Segerstrom. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re Commitment of Randal * From the 29th District Court

Eugene Porter, of Palo Pinto County,

Trial Court No. C47557.

No. 11-18-00015-CV * December 13, 2018

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.;

Gray, C.J., sitting by assignment; and

Wright, S.C.J., sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court and order of civil commitment are

reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply610Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Betty Thayer (... (not verified)PermalinkNovember 2, 2018 - 8:07amWell done, Jim.  Very interesting.  Where will you go next year?
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Gene BUCK, as President of the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, an Unincorporated Association, et al., v. TRIANON COMPANY, Inc., a Corporation. Gene BUCK, etc., et al., v. TARRY INN, Inc. Gene BUCK, etc., et al., v. John G. LOCKHART et al.

Nos. 9231-9233.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 5, 1939.

*1009Sweeney & Haugland, of Seattle, Wash., and Herman D. Kenin, of Portland, Or., for appellants.

Clark R. Belknap, of Seattle, Wash., for appellees.

Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal in each of above causes dismissed, without costs to any party, that a decree of dismissal be filed in each of said causes and that the mandate of this court in each cause issue forthwith.
Exhibit 23.6

Consent of Independent Public Accountants

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Southwestern Electric Power
Company:

      As independent public accountants,  we hereby consent to the incorporation
of  our  report  with  respect  to  the  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  of
Southwestern  Electric Power Company dated  February 25, 2000,  included in this
Form  10-K,  into  Southwestern   Electric  Power  Company's   previously  filed
registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-96213).

Arthur Andersen LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 21, 2000



                                      4-27
<PAGE>

                                                                         EXHIBIT
                                                                         4.16



                               EXTENSION AGREEMENT
                                      WITH
                               HENRI ANDRE BOHNEN




<PAGE>

                              EXTENSION AGREEMENT

It is hereby agreed that the Consulting Agreement dated May 15, 2001 between us
and you, Henri Andre Bohnen is hereby extended from September 1, 2001 to
February 28, 2002. In payment of the services performed or to be performed
during the aforesaid extension period, it is further agreed that J-Bird music
Group, Ltd. will issue to you 20,000 shares of its common stock.

Dated:
As of September 1, 2001

                                            Signed:

                                            J-Bird Music Group, Ltd.
                                            By: s/Hope D. Trowbridge
                                            ------------------------
                                            Hope D. Trowbridge
                                            President


                                            s/Henri Andre Bohnen
                                            --------------------
                                            Henri Andre Bohnen
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40614 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN MANUEL HOLGUIN

- BARRAZA , also known as Juan Manuel Barraza

- Mendez,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:18

- CR

- 257

- 1

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Manuel Holguin

- Barraza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5 th Cir. 2011). Holguin

- Barraza h a s not filed a

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 8, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40614 Document: 00514786049 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2019No. 18

- 40614

2 response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate revie w. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-40614 Document: 00514786049 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2019
#### MARK P. MELLY *v.*COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES

(AC 19662)

Lavery, C. J., and Mihalakos and Zarella, Js.

Submitted on briefs June 14

officially released July 11, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John W. Cole, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his statutory and constitutional right to be present at all critical stages of his trial was violated when the court, in the presence of counsel but in defendant’s absence, considered defendant’s *Sandoval*motion in chambers. The issue is not preserved for appellate review, and absent a showing of prejudice, we decline to reach it in the interest of justice *(see, People v Dunbar,*172 AD2d 1006; *People v Favor,*172 AD2d 1052).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.—Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Denman, Lawton, Lowery and Davis, JJ.
27827

#### State v. Sakurada

Reversed
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2203

CHARLES W. HAMPTON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

J.W. SQUIRE COMPANY INC.,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

DONALD MERRICK; PATTY MERRICK,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (4:10-cv-00013-jlk-mfu)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles W. Hampton, Appellant Pro Se. Amanda M. Morgan, CLEMENT 

& WHEATLEY, South Boston, Virginia; Glenn W. Pulley, CLEMENT & 

WHEATLEY, Danville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles W. Hampton appeals the district court’s order 

granting summary judgment for the Appellee on his claim of 

racial discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Hampton v. J.W. Squire Co., Inc., No. 

4:10-cv-00013-jlk-mfu (W.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2010). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### State v. Elley

25423

09/30/2005

Affirmed, vacated & remanded
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply11933Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Elisabeth Burton (not verified)PermalinkMay 29, 2022 - 5:05pmThis was a fascinating article!  I hope you’ll run followup on how these machines work out over the year with their different attachments and functions.  Staff were able to work on other projects and not laid off, right?
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE I

DIGNITY

DIGNITY

Article 3

Right to the integrity of the person

1.   Everyone has the right to respect for his or her physical and mental integrity.

2.   In the fields of medicine and biology, the following must be respected in particular:

| (a) | the free and informed consent of the person concerned, according to the procedures laid down by law; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the free and informed consent of the person concerned, according to the procedures laid down by law;

| (b) | the prohibition of eugenic practices, in particular those aiming at the selection of persons; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the prohibition of eugenic practices, in particular those aiming at the selection of persons;

| (c) | the prohibition on making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the prohibition on making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain;

| (d) | the prohibition of the reproductive cloning of human beings. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the prohibition of the reproductive cloning of human beings.

---
81 P.3d 1229

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

June 6, 2003

24321

#### State v. Wong

Affirmed