alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Capitol Square SW Cherry Trees
        
                  The Basics
      
Location
      
Near the South Tower

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Site of two varieties: Yoshino (*Prunus x yeodoensis*) and Japanese flowering (*Prunus serrulata*). Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15E0027. MURRAY v. THE STATE.

On April 17, William Murray filed and emergency motion seeking an appeal

of the trial court’s October 17, 2014 order denying his motion for an out-of-time

appeal. For the following reasons, we dismiss the motion. 

This Court's Rule 40 (b) emergency powers are limited and intended to be used

sparingly. Rule 40 (b) provides, in relevant part, that we may only issue “such orders

or give direction to the trial court as may be necessary to preserve jurisdiction of an

appeal or to prevent the contested issue from becoming moot. Generally, no order

shall be made or direction given in an appeal until it has been docketed in this Court.”

In this case, it appears that Murray has already had the benefit of an appeal.

Murray v. State, 315 Ga. App. 653 (727 S.E.2d 267) (2012). Moreover, Murray has

not demonstrated that he has filed a timely notice of appeal in the trial court in a case

to which he is entitled to an appeal. See Simmons v. State, 276 Ga. 525, 525, n. 2 (579

SE2d 735) (2003) (“The denial of a motion for out-of-time appeal is directly

appealable when the criminal conviction at issue has not been the subject of direct

appeal.”). Consequently, Murray has not demonstrated, as required by Rule 40 (b),

that this Court has any jurisdiction “to preserve” or that any contested issue remains

for appellate review. For these reasons, the instant emergency motion is hereby

ordered DISMISSED.

April 17, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/17/2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LUGENIA ANTHONY §

§ No. 491, 2014

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below:

§

§ Superior Court of the

v. § State of Delaware, in and for

§ New Castle County

ERIN BICKLEY and DIAMOND §

STATE PORT CORPORATION, §

§ C. A. No. N12A-12-006 ALR

Defendants Below, §

Appellees. §

Submitted: April 15, 2015

Decided: April 20, 2015

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and VALIHURA, Justices.

O R D E R

This 20th day of April 2015, the Court, having considered this matter 

on the briefs of the parties, and having concluded that the same should be 

affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in 

its Order of August 8, 2014;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment 

of the Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

 Justice
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 7 (Thursday, January 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 2251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00348]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 7 / Thursday, January 10, 2013 / 
Notices

[[Page 2251]]



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1874]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 44; Morris County, NJ

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the New Jersey Department of State, grantee of Foreign-
Trade Zone 44, submitted an application to the Board for authority to 
expand FTZ 44, to add a new site (Site 7) in Flanders, New Jersey, 
within and adjacent to the New York/Newark Customs and Border 
Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 83-2011, filed 12/20/11);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (76 FR 80885, 12/27/11) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 44 is approved, subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of December 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-00348 Filed 1-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

Motion of AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1995-569 for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedule B-7)

MOTION OFAMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12
Communications with respect to this document shouldbe sent to: DANIEL P. GARTON President AmericanEagle Airlines, Inc. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5494 DFW Airport, Texas 75261 KATHLEEN SOLED Vice President &General Counsel American Eagle Airlines, Inc. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5494 DFW Airport, Texas 75261 (817) 967-1574 kate.soled@aa.com August 31, 2012 FRANCIS C. HEIL SeniorAttorney AmericanAirlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5642 francis.heil@aa.comBEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

Motion of AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedule B-7) · DOT-OST-1995-569

MOTION OF AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDERRULE 12
American Eagle Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, herebymoves that its Form41, Schedule B-7 for 2Q2012 be accorded confidential treatment andwithheld frompublic disclosure. The information for which confidential treatment is requestedpertains toAmerican Eagle's airframes and aircraft engine acquisitions and**r~tirements.** In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 41582, we are uploading our confidential report electronically to the following website: http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov On June 5, 1995, James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of Airline Statistics, the Department granted confidential treatment for a 10-yearperiodto similar data filed byAmerican Airlines. For the reasons stated inMr. Mitchell's letter, the Department shouldgrant the same relief here.2 -

WHEREFORE, American Eaglemoves that the schedule referenced above be withheld frompublicdisclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 10 years.

August 31, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

FRANCIS C. HEIL SeniorAttorney AmericanAirlines, Inc. On behalf ofAmerican Eagle Airlines, Inc.
24888

#### Mishima v. Holiday Mart, Inc.

Affirmed
# C_2016202EN.01034501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/345 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/345

---

19.   Declaration on Article 8 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 8 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference agrees that, in its general efforts to eliminate inequalities between women and men, the Union will aim in its different policies to combat all kinds of domestic violence. The Member States should take all necessary measures to prevent and punish these criminal acts and to support and protect the victims.

---
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
John Swigert Jr. Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
George and Mark Lundeen

Materials
    Bronze

Year
    1997

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Visitor Center

This statue of John L. Swigert Jr., was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Colorado in 1997.

John L. "Jack" Swigert Jr., was born on August 30, 1931, in Denver, Colorado. He attended the University of Colorado, where he played varsity football and earned a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering. He served with the Air Force as a combat pilot in Korea and then became a test pilot. After earning a master of science degree in aerospace science from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and a master of business administration degree from Hartford College, he was accepted into the NASA Apollo program.

Swigert was one of three astronauts aboard the Apollo 13 moon mission, which was launched on April 11, 1970. The third lunar landing attempt, the mission was aborted after the rupture of an oxygen tank on the spacecraft's service module. Swigert and fellow astronauts James A. Lovell Jr., and Fred W. Haise Jr., returned safely to earth on April 17 after approximately 5 days and 23 hours in space.

He later became staff director of the Committee on Science and Technology of the U.S. House of Representatives. Elected to Colorado's newly created Sixth Congressional District in 1982, he died on December 27, 1982, before taking office. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply572Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Cheryl Hollis ... (not verified)PermalinkAugust 17, 2017 - 1:02pmUnexpected kindness is available to everyone as a sort of superpower -- bestowing a dopamine hit on all sides.  I like to complement total strangers -- the dad at the coffee shop busy keeping his three young sons in line,  or the older lady at the airport who looked smashing in her bold green shirt.  Small things matter.  Kindness doesn't need a reason.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Stowe *v.*Birmingham Trust & Savings Co., trustee.

No. 5012.

December 17, 1925.

Claim. Before Judge Highsmith. Wayne superior court. June 13, 1925,

*Clark & Gibbs*and *James R. Thomas & Son,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. H. Thomas,*contra.

Executions 23 O. J. p. 604, n. 58.

Municipal Corporations 28 Cyc. p. 1721, n. 59, New, 71.

Hikes, J.

1. The levy of a municipal tax execution for $53.55 upon a described tract of land in a city, which was composed of two adjoining lots, one of which was of the value of $450 and the other of the value of $950, and either of which could have been sold separately, was excessive and void, and in consequence thereof a sale of such tract under such levy was void. *Stark*v. *Cummings,*127 *Ga.*107 (56 S. E. 130); *Williams*v. *Forman,*158 *Ga.*89 (123 S. E. 20); *Planters Bank*v. *Georgia Loan & Trust Co.,*160 *Ga.*107 (127 S. E. 413).

2. It follows that, in a claim case in which the claimant asserts title to such land under a deed based on such tax sale, the court did not err in directing a verdict against the claimant, finding the land subject to the levy of an execution which was issued upon a judgment obtained by the plaintiff therein against the defendant in said tax fi. fa.

*Jxidgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 984 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 984

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 29, 2015

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 
     Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY 
              STUDY.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(46) Chief standing bear national historic trail.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Chief Standing Bear Trail, 
                extending approximately 550 miles from Niobrara, 
                Nebraska, to Ponca City, Oklahoma, which follows the 
                route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca people 
                during Federal Indian removal, and approximately 550 
                miles from Ponca City, Oklahoma, through Omaha, 
                Nebraska, to Niobrara, Nebraska, which follows the 
                return route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca 
                people, as generally depicted on the map entitled 
                `Chief Standing Bear National Historic Trail 
                Feasibility Study', numbered 903/125,630, and dated 
                November 2014.
                    ``(B) Availability of map.--The map described in 
                subparagraph (A) shall be on file and available for 
                public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 
                Department of the Interior.
                    ``(C) Components.--The feasibility study conducted 
                under subparagraph (A) shall include a determination on 
                whether the Chief Standing Bear Trail meets the 
                criteria described in subsection (b) for designation as 
                a national historic trail.
                    ``(D) Considerations.--In conducting the 
                feasibility study under subparagraph (A), the Secretary 
                of the Interior shall consider input from owners of 
                private land within or adjacent to the study area.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16


     THIS AGREEMENT between Champion International Corporation, a New York
corporation (the "Company"), and Andrew C. Sigler (the "Executive") is effective
as of November 21, 1996.

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into a Letter Agreement
dated November 17, 1994, as amended August 15, 1996 (the "Letter Agreement");
and

     WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Letter Agreement in the manner set
forth below;

     NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties as follows:

     1.   The paragraph of the Letter Agreement that begins with the words "In
consideration for" is hereby amended in its entirety to read:

               "In consideration for the performance of the duties of advisor
          and consultant, you will (i) be compensated at an annual rate of
          $50,000 for a period of five years from the date of your retirement;
          (ii) have the right, for a period of ten years from the date of your
          retirement, to the use of an airplane on the terms more fully
          described in Exhibit "A" hereto; and (iii) be provided, during your
          lifetime, with suitable office accommodations, appropriate secretarial
          and chauffeur services, all telephone, fax and other customary
          administrative support services that you may require.  Each annual
          payment of $50,000 will be made in a single lump sum on the
          anniversary of the date of your retirement.  You also will be entitled
          to reimbursement for all reasonable expenses incurred in the
          performance of your duties as advisor and consultant."

     2.   The Letter Agreement as amended by this Agreement shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

     3.   The Company and the Executive understand and agree that all references
in the Letter Agreement to the provisions thereof that are amended hereby shall
be deemed to be references to such provisions as amended hereby.

     4.   Except as amended hereby, all of the terms and conditions set forth in
the Letter Agreement, including without limitation Exhibit "A" thereto, shall
continue in full force and effect without change.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be executed
and its seal to be affixed hereto, and the Executive has executed this
Agreement, all as of November 21, 1996.

                                Champion International Corporation

                                By /s/ Lawrence G. Rawl
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Chairman of the Compensation and
                                   Stock Option Committee

ATTEST:

/s/ Lawrence A. Fox
-------------------------------
Vice President and Secretary


                                /s/ Andrew C. Sigler
                                ---------------------------------------
                                Andrew C. Sigler
July 22, 1998

20795

#### Honda v. State

Affirmed