alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 210 

Affirming and recognizing the Khmer, Laotian, Hmong, and Montagnard 

Freedom Fighters and the people of Cambodia and Laos for their support 

and defense of the United States Armed Forces and freedom in Southeast 

Asia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2015 

Mr. DUFFY (for himself, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, and 

Mr. PERLMUTTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Affirming and recognizing the Khmer, Laotian, Hmong, and 

Montagnard Freedom Fighters and the people of Cambodia and Laos for their support and defense of the 

United States Armed Forces and freedom in Southeast 

Asia. 

Whereas the Khmer, Laotian, Hmong, and Montagnard Freedom Fighters (also known as ‘‘southeast Asian veterans’’) fought and died with United States Armed 

Forces during the conflict in Southeast Asia; 

Whereas the Khmer, Laotian, Hmong, and Montagnard Freedom Fighters rescued United States pilots shot down in 

enemy-controlled territory and returned the pilots to safety; 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 210 IH 

Whereas the Khmer soldiers retrieved and prevented from 

falling into enemy hands secret and sensitive information, 

technology, and equipment; 

Whereas the Khmer, Laotian, Hmong, and Montagnard Freedom Fighters captured and destroyed enemy supplies and 

prevented enemy forces from using the supplies to kill 

members of the United States Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Khmer, Laotian, Hmong, and Montagnard Freedom Fighters gathered and provided to the United States 

Armed Forces intelligence about enemy troop positions, 

movement, and strength; 

Whereas the Khmer, Laotian, Hmong, and Montagnard Freedom Fighters provided food, shelter, and support to the 

United States Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Khmer and National Armed Forces of Cambodia 

facilitated the evacuation of the United States Embassy 

in Phnom Penh on April 12, 1975, by continuing to fight 

Khmer Rouge forces as the forces advanced upon the 

capital; and 

Whereas veterans of the Khmer Mobile Guerrilla Forces, the 

Laotian Special Guerrilla Units, the Khmer Republic 

Armed Forces, the Hmong, and the Montagnard defended human rights, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of representation and association: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives affirms 

2 and recognizes the Khmer, Laotian, Hmong, and 

3 Montagnard Freedom Fighters and the people of Cam4 bodia and Laos for their support and defense of the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 210 IH 

1 United States Armed Forces and freedom in Southeast 

2 Asia. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply379Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Sarah Bauer  (not verified)PermalinkAugust 29, 2022 - 5:39pmThank you so much
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**                                                                                                                               Exhibit 32.1 **
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

KASSANDRA MEAD

,

Appellant,

v.

PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASS OCIATION

OF TERLINGUA RANCH, INC., FRED

PORTER, SARA STATON, AND ALIDA

LORIO RICH

,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00184

- CV

Appeal from

394th District Court

of Brewster County, Texas

(TC#2010

- 12

- B0081

- CV)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that

Appellees recover from Appellant and her sureties, if any, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.5, on the

judgment and all costs, both in this Court and the court below for which let execution issue. This

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Representative Marlin Olmsted Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Pin Oak

Year
    1913

Location
      
Capitol Square, S.W.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text on the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Memorial Tree

*Quercus palustris*
(Pin Oak)

To Honor Representative Marlin E. Olmsted (Pa.)

1913
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    The Rep. Marlin Olmsted tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.

The Rep. Marlin Olmsted tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
    The Rep. Marlin Olmsted tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.

The Rep. Marlin Olmsted tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
    The Rep. Marlin Olmsted tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

The Rep. Marlin Olmsted tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

      Previous Image
        Next Image

          The Rep. Marlin Olmsted tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
      The Rep. Marlin Olmsted tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
      The Rep. Marlin Olmsted tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7005

DEANDRE L’OVERTURE JACKSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, 

District Judge. (2:14-cv-00190-AWA-DEM)

Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 3, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

DeAndre L’overture Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

DeAndre L’overture Jackson seeks to appeal the 

district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
September 17, 2003

25276

#### Akau v. Planning Com’n

Affirmed
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Federal Quarantine Descriptions

(Citrus diseases) (Data Table)

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS publishes the legal description of current quarantine areas and these can be

accessed in the table below.  Users can search by state and pest to determine the

quarantine area(s) by state.

Archived information regarding prior federal quarantine descriptions can be viewed

at the National Plant Board website.

Loading...
May 20, 2003

25165

#### Rogers v. Minoo

Affirmed
# 506th 

# Judicial District Court Albert M. McCaig, Jr., Judge

www.Court506.com

June 8, 2015
Court ofCriminal Appeals P.0. Box 12308 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 

## RECEiVED IN**C~URT** CFCRIP.1!NA1

### A~PEALS 

## JUN lO 2015 Court Coordinator Susie Schubert Court Reporter Robyn S. Wiley

Grimes County Waller County 836 Austin Street, Suite 307

Hempstead, Texas 77445 Fax: 979.826.9149 Ofc: 979.921.0921

Re: Writs Number 08-09-12976E through 08-09-12986E Criminal Trial Court Number 08-09-12976 through 08-09-12986 Ex Parte William Andrew Allen Clerk: I amthetrial courtjudgeinthereferencedmatter. This is my secondlettertothe Court on this subject. The Applicant's cases were originally heard by the 155th Judicial District Court. ByLegislative act (Section 24.254, Government Code), effectiveJanuary 1, 2014, the 506th Judicial District Court took over all cases pending in the 155th Judicial District Court. The Applicant, 

### Mr. William Andrew Allen, has made numerous filings withthe trial court pertaining to his 11.07 Writ applications,·many of which have had to do with his contention that the 506th court does not havejurisdiction ofhis cases. Mr. Allen's frequent and continuous supplementation and filings has required both this court and the Waller County District Clerk, to provide eleven separate supplements to the several 11.07 Applications each time 

### Mr. Ailen files 

## new ailegations. This has become labor and resource intensive, consumes valuable time, and, to date, does not appear to have provided any substantial new information to your court. He is on his fifth filing on each of the eleven cases. I am requesting the Honorable Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to declare Mr. William Andrew Allen a vexatious litigant, and to deny him further access to the courts until his current applications for 11.07 reliefhave been ruled on by your court
.



### AMMI c: Waller County District Clerk Mr. William Andrew Allen 

# .**~/if~ /~~~~!-~·McCAIG,** 

. Judge, Presiding



### Mr. Elton Mathis, Waller County District Attorney 

# '""
October 7, 1996

16875

#### State v. Du

Order No. 96-15

Affirmed
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5

                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                              MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made
and entered into as of October 1, 1996, by and between CENTEX DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Partnership"), and 3333
Holding Corporation, a Nevada corporation ("Manager").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, the Partnership and Manager entered into that certain
Management Agreement dated as of April 1, 1994 (the "Management Agreement");

         WHEREAS, the Partnership and Manager now desire to amend certain terms
of the Management Agreement as set forth in this Amendment, effective as of
October 1, 1996;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises above and the mutual
covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the
Partnership and Manager do hereby agree as follows:

         1.     The first sentence of Section 13(a) of the Management Agreement
is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

                "(a) Management Fee. Manager shall receive a fee for its
         services under this Agreement equal to all costs incurred by the
         Manager in performing this Agreement plus $25,000 for each quarter
         covered by this Agreement, such fee to be payable quarterly."

         2.     Except as expressly modified and amended by this Amendment, the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the date first set forth above.

                                      CENTEX DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.

                                      By:   3333 Development Corporation,
                                            its sole general partner


                                            By:  /s/  J. STEPHEN BILHEIMER
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 J. Stephen Bilheimer
                                                 President

                                      3333 HOLDING CORPORATION


                                      By:   /s/ KIMBERLY PINSON
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Kimberly Pinson
                                            Vice President