alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Compania Panamena Maritima San Gerassimo, S. A., Plaintiff, *v.*International Union Lines, Ltd., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

April 20, 1959.

*Platow & Lyon (John P. Rowan*of counsel), for defendant appearing specially.

*Poles, Grist, Tublin & Patestides (John G. Poles*of counsel),, for plaintiff.

Edgar J. Nathan, Jr., J.

Defendant, appearing specially, moves to vacate a warrant of attachment obtained in an action for damages for a breach of a charter party contract. The warrant of attachment was obtained upon the basis of an affidavit asserting the existence of a cause of action for a sum of money only.

The facts now disclose that prior to the application for the issuance of the warrant, plaintiff demanded arbitration of this dispute in accordance with the arbitration clause in the charter party contract. Each of the parties have selected arbitrators and they are in the process of appointing a third arbitrator to act as chairman. These facts were not disclosed to the court on the application for the warrant of attachment.

The court on a motion to vacate a warrant of attachment need only decide whether plaintiff has complied with the jurisdictional requirements of sections 902 and 903 of the Civil Practice Act. *498It may not consider the merits of the action unless it is clearly esta! lished that the action must fail.

“ Certainly, it cannot be said that a plaintiff fails to state a prima facie cause of action merely because the contract upon which suit is brought contains an agreement to arbitrate. Defendant’s sole remedy is to apply for a stay of plaintiff’s action until the arbitration has been had ” *(American Reserve Ins. Co.*v. *China Ins. Co.,*297 N. Y. 322, 327).

The stay provided for in section 1451 of the Civil Practice Act is the exclusive remedy for a person against whom an action has been brought in violation of the agreement to arbitrate, and an attachment will not be vacated on the ground that the action is subject to arbitration *(American Reserve Ins. Co.*v. *China Ins. Co.,*supra; see, also, *Auerbach*v. *Grand Nat. Pictures, Ltd.,*176 Misc. 1031).

The court is of the opinion that plaintiff has made a prima facie showing sufficient to sustain the warrant in this case, despite the facts disclosed upon this motion. Accordingly, the motion to vacate the warrant is denied.
Exhibit 99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of AFG Investment Trust D (the
"Trust"),  on  Form  10-Q  for  the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  the  Principal  Executive Officer of the Trust's Managing Trustee,
hereby  certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:
(1)     the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and
(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of the Trust.

                    /s/  Gary  D.  Engle
                    --------------------
                    Gary  D.  Engle
President  of  AFG  ASIT  Corporation,  the  Managing  Trustee  of  the  Trust
(Principal  Executive  Officer)
                    August  19,  2002
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50115

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CURTIS REUBEN WASHINGTON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:02-CR-97-1

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Curtis Reuben Washington has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Washington has not filed a response.

“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion,

if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Article III,

section 2, of the Constitution limits federal court jurisdiction to actual cases and

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-50115

2

controversies. Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). The case-or-controversy

requirement demands that “some concrete and continuing injury other than the

now-ended incarceration or parole – some ‘collateral consequence’ of the

conviction – must exist if the suit is to be maintained.” Id.

Counsel asserts that there are no nonfrivolous issues relating to the

district court’s revocation of Washington’s supervised release and sentence of

seven months in prison. During the pendency of this appeal, Washington

completed his seven-month term of imprisonment. The judgment imposed no

further supervised release term. Accordingly, there is no case or controversy for

this court to address, and this appeal is DISMISSED as moot. Counsel’s motion

to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply379Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Sewall Menzel (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 12, 2021 - 9:22am

              In reply to Where were the US by Michael Mineha... (not verified)I teach a course in American Foreign Policy at Florida Atlantic University
and we cover the War of 1812 in some detail.
Your information on where the Constitution and Bill of Rights were stored
at this time, shall be greatly appreciated by myself and my students.
Thanks.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 21, 2018

p1114 

# Order

Clerk November 21, 2018

156849

RAFAELI, LLC and ANDRE OHANESSIAN,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 156849

COA: 330696

Oakland CC: 2015

- 147429

- CZ

OAKLAND COUNTY and ANDREW MEISNER,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is c onsidered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall

address whether the defendants violated either the Takings Clause of the United States

Constitution, US Const, Am V, or the Takings Clause of the Michigan Constitution, Const

1963, art 10, § 2, or both, by r etaining proceeds from the sale of tax foreclosed property

that exceeded the amount of the tax delinquency in accordance with MCL 211.78m(8)(h).

The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case

may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal.

# SUMMARY:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announces the renewal of the charter of the Board of Scientific Counselors, Office of Readiness and Response (BSC, ORR); (formerly known as the Board of Scientific Counselors, Center for Preparedness and Response (BSC, CPR)).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ian Williams, Ph.D., M.S., Designated Federal Officer, Board of Scientific Counselors, Office of Readiness and Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H21-5, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027. Telephone: (404) 639-2210; Email:                         *IWilliams@cdc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

CDC is providing notice under 5 U.S.C. 1001-1014 of the renewal of the charter of the Board of Scientific Counselors, Office of Readiness and Response (formerly known as the Board of Scientific Counselors, Center for Preparedness and Response), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services. This charter has been renewed for a two-year period through November 5, 2025.

                    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2023-26420 Filed 11-30-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# C_2016202EN.01006101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/61

---

Article 35

(ex Article 29 TEC)

(ex Article 29 TEC)

Quantitative restrictions on exports, and all measures having equivalent effect, shall be prohibited between Member States.

---
Exhibit 32.2



Section 906 Certification of Chief
Financial Officer



I, Jerrold J. Pellizzon, Chief Financial
Officer of Ceradyne, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 16, 2005



/s/    JERROLD J.
PELLIZZONJerrold J. PellizzonChief Financial Officer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Louisiana Purchase, 1803
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

EverGreene Painting Studios

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1994

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

The third signing of the Louisiana Treaty, which occurred in New Orleans, is depicted.About the Cox Corridors MuralsThe first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The western north-south corridor, called the Westward Expansion corridor, includes maps and scenes showing the growth of the United States from early exploration through the acquisition of Alaska and Hawaii. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Gall v. Gall

18659

3/15/96

Affirmed
146 P.3d 630

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### Kaanapali Hillside Homeowners' Ass'n v. Doran.

25585

10/31/2006

Denied

112 Hawai'i 356, 145 P.3d 899
#### State v. Harris

24914

08/25/2003

Vacated and remanded
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule15d-14(b)Of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DynTek, Inc.,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedDecember 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer,hereby certifies pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securitiesand Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that based on my knowledge:

(1)           the Report of the Company filed today pursuant toSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Dated: February 20, 2007 | /s/ Mark E. Ashdown     |   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                     | Mark E. Ashdown         |   |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
#### City of Batavia, Respondent, v Leo J. Bolas et al., Appellants.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The trial court properly determined that the measure of damages in this partial taking case was "the difference between the value of the whole *before*the taking and the value of the remainder *after*the taking” *(Diocese of Buffalo v State of New York,*24 NY2d 320, 323). We affirm the trial court’s award inasmuch as it is within the range of the conflicting expert opinion testimony and is not affected by legal error *(see, Matter of Village of Hilton v Edelman,*83 AD2d 767; *City of Buffalo v Goldman,*63 AD2d 828, 829). The city’s appraisal complied with the requirements established by the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 NYCRR part 202) and was not based upon the method of valuation held to be invalid by the Court of Appeals in *Latham Holding Co. v State of New York*(16 NY2d 41). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Genesee County, Graney, J.—Condemnation.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
26369

#### Capua v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Affirmed
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

August 7, 2008

27416

#### Association of Apartment Owners of 2987 Kalakaua ex rel. Bd. of Directors v. Dubois

Affirmed
# L_2005102EN.01001301.xml

| 21.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/13

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 144/2004

of 29 October 2004

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 125/2004 of 24 September 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 125/2004 of 24 September 2004 (1).

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indents shall be added in point 54zn (Commission Regulation (EC) No 466/2001) of Chapter XII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32003 R 1425: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1425/2003 of 11 August 2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 1), |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32003 R 1425: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1425/2003 of 11 August 2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 1),

| — | 32004 R 0455: Commission Regulation (EC) No 455/2004 of 11 March 2004 (OJ L 74, 12.3.2004, p. 11).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32004 R 0455: Commission Regulation (EC) No 455/2004 of 11 March 2004 (OJ L 74, 12.3.2004, p. 11).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulations (EC) Nos 1425/2003 and 455/2004 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 October 2004, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 October 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kjartan JÓHANNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 64, 10.3.2005, p. 47.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 74, 12.3.2004, p. 11.

3

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000879465
<NAME>                        TADEO HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                                 6,524,451
<SECURITIES>                                           5,348,196
<RECEIVABLES>                                          99,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       7,414,678
<PP&E>                                                 129,265
<DEPRECIATION>                                         55,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         15,582,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  2,496,400
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               1,585
<OTHER-SE>                                             13,067,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           15,582,743
<SALES>                                                487,832
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       487,832
<CGS>                                                  209,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          209,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       502,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (61,952)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (61,952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (61,952)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.01)



</TABLE>