alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant      to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)**

**Under      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of      2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of                the                Company. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date                March 12, 2007                   |                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |                                          |
| /s/                Father Gregory Ofiesh             | /s/                Father Gregory Ofiesh      |
| Father                Gregory Ofiesh                 | Father                Gregory Ofiesh          |
| President                and Chief executive Officer | Acting                Chief Financial Officer |

----
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Sarah Ellis (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 16, 2021 - 9:02amWhat you do is so valuable, you make sure America shows it’s best to the world. I’m sorry you so often go unappreciated but I am deeply grateful especially after recent events.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
(VW)

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT APR 17 2015
Clerk, U.S. District & Bankrupte|

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Gat, U8, Dine & Bankruptcy
WAYNE SMITH EL BEY, )
)
Petitioner, )
)

v. ) Civil Action No. {4 -i TAG (vw)
)
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, et al., )
)
Respondents. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on review of petitioner’s application to proceed in
forma pauperis and pro se petition for a writ of mandamus.! The Court will grant the

application, and dismiss the petition.

Petitioner identifies himself as an “Aboriginal Indigenous Moorish-American.” Pet. at 1.
It appears that his claims arise from proceedings in Small Claims Court initiated by a creditor.
See id. at 2. Petitioner states that he submitted a “Writ in the Nature of Discovery” to his
creditor with a copy to the Small Claims Court, a Magistrate of which informed petitioner that a
discovery request need not be honored. /d. It further appears that, when the Writ of Discovery
was not honored, petitioner sent his creditor a “Notice of Default Judgment.” Jd. Petitioner
states that he received a notice from the Small Claims Court indicating that a motion had been

denied. Jd. In this action, petitioner has demanded an order compelling the Magistrate to honor

' It is not clear that petitioner is a prisoner to whom the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) apply. Accordingly,
the Order [ECF No. 3] which directed petitioner to file a certified copy of his trust fund account statement will be
vacated,


the default judgment and that “all claims, petitions, suits, filings with any third party

corporations regarding [his] credit history be dismissed and expunged.” Jd. at 4.

Mandamus relief is proper only if “(1) the plaintiff has a clear right to relief; (2) the
defendant has a clear duty to act; and (3) there is no other adequate remedy available to
plaintiff.” Council of and for the Blind of Delaware County Valley v. Regan, 709 F.2d 1521,
1533 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (en banc). The party seeking mandamus has the “burden of showing that

9

{his] right to issuance of the writ is ‘clear and indisputable.” Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v.
Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 289 (1988) (citing Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. Holland, 346
U.S. 379, 384 (1953)). This petitioner addresses none of these elements, and thus fails to meet
his burden. Furthermore, this federal district court is without authority to review or direct the
actions of a state court judge or magistrate. See Richardson v. District of Columbia Court of

Appeals, 83 F.3d 1513, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (citing District of Columbia v. Feldman, 460 U.S.

462, 476 (1983) and Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923)).

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

Acspi>

United States District Judge

DATE: “| [75
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 131 

Supporting the designation of March 2015, as National Colorectal Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2015 

Mr. PAYNE (for himself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. DENT, and Mr. LANCE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of March 2015, as National 

Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month. 

Whereas colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men and women combined in the United 

States; 

Whereas this year, more than 130,000 individuals in the 

United States will be diagnosed with colorectal cancer 

and approximately 50,000 more will die from it; 

Whereas colorectal cancer is one of the most highly preventable forms of cancer because screening tests can find polyps that can be removed before becoming cancerous; 

Whereas screening tests can detect colorectal cancer early, 

when treatment works best; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 131 IH 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that if every individual aged 50 or older had regular screening tests, as many as 60 percent of deaths 

from colorectal cancer could be prevented; 

Whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with localized 

colorectal cancer is 90 percent, but only 39 percent of all 

diagnoses occur at this stage; 

Whereas colorectal cancer screenings can effectively reduce 

colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, yet, 1 in 3 

adults between the ages of 50 and 75 are not up to date 

with recommended colorectal cancer screening; 

Whereas public awareness and education campaigns on 

colorectal cancer prevention, screening, and symptoms 

are held during the month of March each year; and 

Whereas educational efforts can help provide information to 

the public of methods of prevention and screening, as 

well as about symptoms for early detection: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the month with appropriate awareness 

6 and educational activities. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 81362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25845]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Notice of Public Meeting of the Tennessee Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights 
(Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a 
meeting of the Tennessee Advisory Committee to the Commission will 
convene by Zoom on Wednesday, November 29, 2023, at 3:30 p.m. (CT). The 
purpose of the meeting is to discuss their draft report on Voting 
Rights in the state.

DATES: The meeting will take place on Wednesday, November 29, 2023, at 
3:30 p.m. (CST).
    Registration Link (Audio/Visual): https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1609784727?pwd=bkhjVWlYa2c4Y0ZmZkx1Uk9SOEJodz09 9SOEJodz09
    Telephone (Audio Only): Dial (833) 568-8864 USA Toll Free; Access 
Code: 160 978 4727

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Moreno at [email protected] 
or by phone at 434-515-0204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is available to the public 
through the Zoom link above. If joining only via phone, callers can 
expect to incur charges for calls they initiate over wireless lines, 
and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Individuals 
who are deaf, deafblind and hard of hearing may also follow the 
proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-
8339 and providing the Service with the call-in number found through 
registering at the web link provided above for the meeting.
    Members of the public are entitled to make comments during the open 
period at the end of the meeting. Members of the public may also submit 
written comments; the comments must be received in the Regional 
Programs Unit within 30 days following the respective meeting. Written 
comments may be emailed to Victoria Moreno at [email protected]. All 
written comments received will be available to the public.
    Persons who desire additional information may contact the Regional 
Programs Unit at (202) 809-9618. Records and documents discussed during 
the meeting will be available for public viewing as they become 
available at the www.facadatabase.gov. Persons interested in the work 
of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's 
website, www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Regional Programs Unit at the 
above phone number or email address.
    Agenda: Wednesday, November 29, 2023, at 1:30 p.m. (CT)

1. Welcome & Roll Call
2. Chair's Comments
3. Discussion on Report
4. Next Steps
5. Public Comment
6. Adjourn

    Dated: November 17, 2023.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2023-25845 Filed 11-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit 32.2

Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Jerrold J. Pellizzon, Chief Financial Officer of
Ceradyne, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 16, 2006



/s/ JERROLD J. PELLIZZONJerrold J. PellizzonChief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARCUS EMILIO VILLARREAL,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 23-462

D.C. No.1:15-cr-00051-BLW-2

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 12, 2023**

Before: WALLACE, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Marcus Emilio Villarreal appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 24-month sentence imposed upon the third revocation of his 

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

Villarreal contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 18 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-462

the district court failed to adequately account for his progress on supervision and 

his mitigating factors. The district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. 

United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The above-Guidelines, statutory maximum

sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) factors and 

the totality of the circumstances, including Villarreal’s repeated breaches of the 

court’s trust. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51 (stating totality of the circumstances 

standard); United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir. 2006) (holding 

that a revocation sentence may be imposed as a sanction for the defendant’s breach 

of the court’s trust); see also United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez, 587 F.3d 904, 

908 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The weight to be given the various factors in a particular case 

is for the discretion of the district court.”).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23




                       Consent of Independent Accountants


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in registration  statement numbers
333-59767  and  333-76067 on Form S-3 of Kaneb Pipe Line  Partners,  L.P. and in
registration statement number 333-44634 on Form S-3 of Kaneb Pipe Line Operating
Partnership,   L.P.  of  our  report  dated  March  2,  2001,  relating  to  the
consolidated  balance sheets of Kaneb Pipe Line Partners,  L.P. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of
income, partners' capital and cash flows for each of the years in the three year
period ended  December  31, 2000,  which report is included on page F-15 of this
Form 10-K.


KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 16, 2001
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6377

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.
EMILIO CHASE, a/k/a E, a/k/a Dominic Mario Chase,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:04-cr-00042-JPB-JES-1)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 24, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished by per curiam opinion.

Emilio Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Emilio Chase appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chase , No. 3:04-cr-00042-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 20, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


On
this 7th day of May 2018, in return for valuable consideration received for expenses paid, the undersigned borrower,
Thenablers Ltd (herein “Borrower”), promises to pay to Thenablers, Inc. (the "Lender"), the sum of Thirty
Thousand Dollars ($30,000.00) with no interest.


Terms of Repayment: This
loan shall be repaid in full on June 30, 2018.


Place
of Payment - all payments due under this Note shall be made at at such other place and manner as the Borrower may designate
in writing.


Prepayment
- This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. All prepayments shall first be applied to
interest, and then to principal payments in the order of their maturity.


Default - In the event of default, the
borrower[s] agree to pay all costs and expenses incurred by the Lender, including all reasonable attorney fees (including both
hourly and contingent attorney fees as permitted by law) for the collection of this Note upon default, and including reasonable
collection charges (including, where consistent with industry practices, a collection charge set as a percentage of the outstanding
balance of this Note) should collection be referred to a collection agency.


Modification
- No modification or waiver of any of the terms of this Agreement shall be allowed unless by written agreement signed
by both parties. No waiver of any breach or default hereunder shall be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach or default of the
same or similar nature.


Transfer
of the Note - The borrower hereby waives any notice of the transfer of this Note by the Lender or by any subsequent
holder of this Note, agrees to remain bound by the terms of this Note subsequent to any transfer, and agree that the terms of this
Note may be fully enforced by any subsequent holder of this Note.


Severability
of Provisions - In the event that any portion of this Note is deemed unenforceable, all other provisions of this Note
shall remain in full force and effect.


Choice
of Law - All terms and conditions of this Note shall be interpreted under the laws of Nevada.

Dated and Executed on the date notated above.


Thenablers Ltd 


By:


 


/s/ Panagiotis Nikolaos Lazaretos


 


Print Name: Panagiotis Nikolaos Lazaretos


 


Print Title: Owner


 


 


THENABLERS, INC.


By:


 


/s/ Panagiotis Tolis


 


Print Name: Panagiotis Tolis


 


Print Title: CFO/Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                           
<ARTICLE>                                       5
                                                 
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                    1352080
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              509009
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                0
<PP&E>                                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           19777777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           0
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                               15229533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             19777777
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          3156558
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           817262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          99461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           2239835
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       2239835
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                              2239835
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0
        
 

</TABLE>
From: Carlson, Sara <Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com>

Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 8:50 AM

To: Land, Eva

Subject: BlackHawk/BlacHornet - Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Hey Eva,

Good morning. In regards to your questions on the BlackHawk/BlackHornet applications the emergency 

air compressor is a 40CFR1039 Tier 4 engine. Also, the emission factors (NOx, PM, VOC and CO2) for the 

main engines were based off of the worst case 50% load (engines 2-5 it were interpolated for 50%) for 

all engines that were stack tested. 

If you have any other questions please let me know.

Thanks,

Sara Carlson

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Sr HSE Representative, Gulf of Mexico

Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com

832-636-1273 (office)

832-506-0888 (cell)

Click here for Anadarko’s Electronic Mail Disclaimer