alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 20171 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MARTIN LUTHER WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 626

- 1

Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Martin Luther Williams moves this court for summary disposition following his guilty plea conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) and 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2). Williams asserts that § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional on its face and as applied in his case; however, he acknowledges that his arguments have been rejected by this court in United States v. Daugherty , 264

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 24 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-20171 Document: 00512945889 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2015No. 14

- 20171

F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001). Williams raises hi s arguments solely in order to preserve them for possible further review. Given the foregoing, Williams’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED , and the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED

.

2 Case: 14-20171 Document: 00512945889 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Wireless  Telecom Group,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Periodic
Report"), I, Karabet Simonyan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Periodic  Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly  presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                       /s/ Karabet Simonyan
                                       --------------------
                                       Karabet Simonyan
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       November 5, 2004









The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7127

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHNNIE WILSON DALE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:01-cr-00052-2; 1:04-cv-00023) Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 3, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnnie Wilson Dale, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Johnnie Wilson Dale seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dale has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### HERBERT PRIOLEAU *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 18930)

Lavery, C. J., and Foti and Dupont, Js.

Argued May 2

officially released May 30, 2000

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
OMB No. 0581-0178

(Rev. 5/2017) Destroy previous editions.

The Secretary of Agriculture

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Washington, D.C. 20250

Dear Secretary:

I hereby accept the appointment to the position on the Florida Tomato Committee as set forth in 

the Selection Order. I agree to serve during the period for which I was appointed and until my successor 

has been selected and has qualified.

In accepting this appointment, I also agree to carry out assigned duties in administering the terms 

and provisions of the Marketing Order to the best of my ability.

Sincerely,

_______________________________________

Signature

_______________________________________

_______________________________________

Address

_______________________________________

Date
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE


### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Marsha Bennett v. Raymond P. Jenkins, Walter Lucas, Ceasar Moore, Jr., Juan Sanchez Munoz, and Renu Khator

Appellate case number: 01

- 2 1

- 0 0 557

- CV

Trial court case number: 2020

- 67065

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Marsha Bennett

, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court ’s September 13

, 2021 order granting the plea to the jurisdiction, motion to dismiss, and motion for summary judgment of appellees, Raymond P. Jenkins, Walter Lucas, Ceasar Moore, Jr., Juan Sanchez Munoz, and Renu Khator.

On March 22, 2022 , appellant filed h er appellant’s brief. On March 29, 2022, this Court informed appellant tha t her March 22, 2022 appellant’s brief did not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1. Accordingly, the Court struck appellant’s March 22, 2022 appellant’s brief and ordered appellant to file a corrected brief that c omplied with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within thirty days of the date of our order.

On March 28, 2022, appellant filed a document titled “Motion for Brief Without Argument

, ” requesting that the Court “move forward” with her case. Th e motion is denied

. Briefing is not yet complete in this case. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6; Bolling v. Farmers Branch Indep. Sch. Dist. , 315 S.W.3d 893, 896 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2010, no pet.) (“Only when we are provided with proper briefing may we discharge our responsibility to review the appeal and make a decision that disposes of the appeal one way or the other.”) . Appellant’s corrected brief remains due on or before April 28, 2022

.

It is so ORDE RED.

Judge’s signature:

___________ /s/ Julie Countiss

___________________ Acting individually

Date:

___ April 7, 2022

_________
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Topics in Drug Development and Molecular Pharmacology—A.                    

*Date:*                         December 5, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Bidyottam Mittra, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, (301) 435-4057,                         *bidyottam.mittra@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 17, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-25884 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
March 23, 2007

27020

#### State v. Mathias

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule   contains  summary   financial   information
extracted  from  the   Consolidated   Balance  Sheets,   the
Consolidated  Statements of Operations and the  Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive  Income, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                          935,413
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   30,771,737
<ALLOWANCES>                    1,428,541
<INVENTORY>                     39,425,594
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                72,085,721
<PP&E>                          32,828,225
<DEPRECIATION>                  (19,004,402)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  92,887,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           22,628,533
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        3,688,559
<OTHER-SE>                      26,540,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    92,887,667
<SALES>                         114,689,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                114,689,474
<CGS>                           72,170,810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   72,170,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                26,070,457
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              4,771,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 11,677,098
<INCOME-TAX>                    4,593,228
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             6,681,735
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    6,681,735
<EPS-BASIC>                   1.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                   1.87



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul R.
Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 2, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|/s/ PAUL R. FLANDERS                                                                 
|Paul R. Flanders
Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer March 18, 2011
26835

#### State v. Kalili

Affirmed
Total Pounds of Milk Pooled on any Federal Order

From Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee

2000 - 2012

YEAR TOTAL POUNDS POOLED

2000 10,568,754,333

2001 10,139,336,455

2002 9,932,209,135

2003 9,270,621,003

2004 9,049,467,174

2005 9,001,622,128

2006 8,634,070,851

2007 8,177,655,670

2008 7,801,805,486

2009 7,702,457,368

2010 7,434,365,621

2011 7,454,360,749

2012 7,600,727,058
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: FAA- 2014 - 0627 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM217AD 382 - 57 - 82 --- 12/ 7 /04 382 - 57 - 82, R1 – 2/24/05 382 - 57 - 82, R2 – 2/15/07 382 - 57 - 82, R5 – 8/12/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
August 29, 2008

28042

#### Lamoya v. A.L. Kilgo Co., Inc.

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Iron Foundry, circa 1850
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

The expansion and industrialization of America required iron and steel for railroads, bridges, skyscrapers, and tools. The mural shows work at the foundry of the Nashua, New Hampshire, Iron Company.

**Left:** Women leave their homes to work in a factory, symbolizing a change in American society brought about by industrialization.

**Right:** The cotton gin represents the replacement of hand labor by mechanization.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The central east-west corridor is referred to as the Great Experiment Hall because it chronicles in 16 murals the legislative milestones of three centuries, from the signing of the Mayflower Compact in 1629 to the enactment of women's suffrage in 1920. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply466Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Katlyn Hughes ... (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 22, 2016 - 10:06amI love the work that people did on this rotunda and I can't wait to see it this summer!!!!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
October 5, 2004

24726

#### Keneke Roofing, Inc. v. Island Ins. Co., Ltd.

Affirmed
Opinion issued August 20 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 15 - 00343 - CV

——————————— RHR PARTNERS, LLC , Appella nt

V. THE ARENA GROUP, L.P . , Appell e e On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2013 - 25166
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, RHR Partners, LLC , has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 20.1; see also T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the2

Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13

- 91 27 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond
. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes , Massengale , and Lloyd
.
September 24, 2007

27954

#### State v. Bayly

Affirmed