alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This shedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     the consolidated Statements of Operations and Balance Sheets and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        2,156,000
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 74,987,000
<ALLOWANCES>                  3,444,000
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              97,823,000
<PP&E>                        135,142,000
<DEPRECIATION>                20,424,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                326,414,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         54,568,000
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      308,000
<OTHER-SE>                    77,789,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  326,414,000
<SALES>                       355,526,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              355,526,000
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 342,562,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            6,853,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               6,111,000
<INCOME-TAX>                  1,731,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           4,380,000
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  4,380,000
<EPS-BASIC>                   .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .10



</TABLE>
#### Howard Smith BENNETT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Samuel SMITH, Warden, Utah State Prison, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 14229.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 17, 1976.

Howard Smith Bennett, pro se.

Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., William W. Barrett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendant-respondent.

*697PER CURIAM:

Howard Smith Bennett appeals from denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus by which he sought a belated second go-round attack upon his conviction of murder in the second degree. For a statement of the facts and a review of all properly claimed errors see the prior decision.1 One year and a half later he filed in Third District Court his petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking to have his conviction declared void and that he be released from prison. The court denied the petition and he appeals.

This court has stated in numerous cases such as the instant one the basic and necessary rule: that after one has been convicted of crime and has had all his claims of error reviewed on appeal, and his conviction affirmed, that should put the judgment at rest. He should not be permitted at a later time to use habeas corpus to again attack his conviction on matters which were either dealt with or could have been dealt with at the time for appeal.2

Petitioner complains that he was not afforded a formal hearing in open court. This is a civil proceeding in which there is no requirement that a party be present. What he is entitled to is a correct and just determination of his case. When the files and records of the case show clearly that he was not entitled to relief, no such hearing is required.3

We are in accord with the view of the trial court that other points argued by the petitioner are so lacking in merit that they do not justify discussion herein.

Affirmed. No costs awarded.

1

. *State v. Bennett,*30 Utah 2d 343, 517 P.2d 1029.

2

. See e. g. *Ainslie v. Smith,*531 P.2d 864 (Utah 1975); *George v. Turner,*30 Utah 2d 279, 516 P.2d 1397; *Zunibrunnen v. Turner,*27 Utah 2d 428, 497 P.2d 34; *Brown v. Turner,*21 Utah 2d 96, 440 P.2d 968.

3

. See *Hodges v. United States,*368 U.S. 139, 82 S.Ct. 235, 7 L.Ed.2d 184; *Hulees v. Rhay,*4 Wash.App. 97, 479 P.2d 156.
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II
STATE OF WASHINGTON , No. 53551

- 3

- II Respondent,

v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION
MATTHEW BENJAMIN LABOUNTY , aka NICHOLAS RYAN GEORGE, Appellant.

M AXA , J

. – Matthew LaBounty initially appeal ed his sentence for unlawful possession of a controlled substance, buprenorphine. In a supplemental brief, LaBounty challenged his conviction following the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Blake , 197 Wn.2d 170 , 481 P.3d 521 (2021). The State concedes that LaBounty’s conviction must be vacated

. We reverse and
remand for the trial court to vacate LaBounty’s conviction. While LaBounty was incarcerated on another matter, correction s officers found a controlled substance in his possession. The State charged LaBounty with unlawful possession of
a controlled substan ce, buprenorphine. He agreed to plead guilty based on a plea agreement with
the State. LaBounty now challenges his conviction.
In Blake , the Supreme Court held that Washington’s strict liability drug possession statute, RCW 69.50.4013(1), violates state and federal due process clauses and therefore is void.
197 Wn.2d at 195

. As a result, any conviction based on that statute is invalid. See I n re Pers. Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two May 4, 2021No

. 53551

- 3

- II

2

Restraint of Hinton , 152 Wn.2d 853, 857, 100 P.3d 801 (2004) ( a judgment and sentence is
invalid on it s face when a defendant is convicted of a nonexistent crime )

. A nd a convict ion
based on a n unconstitutional statute must be vacated

. See Blake , 197 Wn.2d at 195; State v. Carnahan , 130 Wn. App. 159, 164, 122 P.3d 187 (2005) (vacating a conviction that was based on a statute that the Supreme Court held was unconstitutional). Therefore, LaBounty ’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance must be vacated

. We reverse and remand to the trial court to vacate LaBounty’s conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance

. A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public r ecord in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, it is so ordered.

MAXA, J.

We concur:

SUTTON, J.

GLASGOW, A.C.J.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Robert Joseph Pothier, Relief Portrait
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Joseph Kiselewski

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1950

Location
      
House Chamber

Robert Joseph Pothier (1699-1772) French jurist; author of the Digest of Pandects of Justinian, a classic study of Roman law; author of several treatises on French law, which were incorporated in the French Code Civil.

The 23 marble relief portraits over the gallery doors of the House Chamber in the U.S. Capitol depict historical figures noted for their work in establishing the principles that underlie American law. They were installed when the chamber was remodeled in 1949-1950. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT AUGUST 31, 1998 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                          93,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  850,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               981,000
<PP&E>                                         244,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,685,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,001,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     545,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,685,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,022,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,729,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (736,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (736,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (736,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.09)
        

</TABLE>
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2001 5711 5637 5513 5427 5494 5651 5679 5642 5579 5610 5626 5546

2002 5582 5535 5623 5660 5721 5824 5777 5769 5581 5567 5623 5704

2003 5711 5759 5873 5934 5942 6064 6060 5997 6033 5872 5956 5996

2004 6045 6019 5983 6115 6213 6299 6298 6285 6274 6294 6193 6164

2005 6189 6204 6218 6114 6320 6330 6313 6267 6289 6275 6371 6323

2006 6388 6250 6277 6294 6332 6365 6393 6488 6409 6419 6339 6386

2007 6587 6458 6625 6698 6688 6761 6659 6671 6695 6729 6792 6952

2008 6860 6725 6718 6863 6919 7006 7055 7097 7020 6872 6886 6919

2009 6964 6946 6931 6921 6901 6916 7029 7201 7179 7286 7277 7444

2010 7440 7301 7226 7178 7195 7357 7322 7449 7469 7664 7778 7827

2011 7909 7852 7773 7749 7743 7897 7918 7887 7835

Not in labor force

Number in thousands

60 to 64 years

2001 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU05000096

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 60-64 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: October 17, 2011 (10:52:53 AM)
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Annual

5593

5664

5933

6182

6268

6362

6693

6912

7083

7434

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: October 17, 2011 (10:52:53 AM)
**Exhibit 32.1**Section Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive OfficerI, Joel P. Moskowitz, Chief Executive Officer of Ceradyne, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:          (1)     the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and          (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: February 26, 2008         /s/ Joel P. Moskowitz        Joel P. Moskowitz        Chief Executive Officer
#### State v. Creots

17664

04/29/96

Affirmed
August 6, 2007

26705

#### Fernandez v. Kapiolani Medical Center at Pali Momi

Affirmed
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the filing by Ionatron, Inc. (the “Company”) of its Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”)
      I, Kenneth M. Wallace, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:






(i)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and




(ii)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
                Company.




This
      certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
      Financial Officer of Ionatron, Inc. with the requirements of Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used for any other purposes. A signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Ionatron, Inc. and will be retained by Ionatron, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Kenneth
              M. WallaceKenneth
                M. Wallace
              Chief
                Financial Officer




Date:
      May
      10, 2007
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Spanish Mission
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

EverGreene Painting Studios

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1994

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

A converted Native American kneels in prayer under the guidance of a monk in front of the El Carmelo mission.About the Cox Corridors MuralsThe first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The western north-south corridor, called the Westward Expansion corridor, includes maps and scenes showing the growth of the United States from early exploration through the acquisition of Alaska and Hawaii. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certification**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States      Code)**

|                                    |                                                      |                               |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                                      |
|                               |                                                 |                          |
| Dated:                February 17, 2006 | By:                                             | /s/ Zan                Guerry |
|                                    | Zan                Guerry                                 |
|                                    | Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer  |

|                                      |                                               |                                    |
|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                               |
|                                 |                                          |                               |
| Dated:                  February 17, 2006 | By:                                      | /s/                  Robert E. Bosworth |
|                                      | Robert                  E. Bosworth                |
|                                      | Principal                  Financial Officer  |
LASERSIGHT INCORPORATED

                                                                      Exhibit 32


      Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

      Pursuant  to  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  LaserSight
Incorporated (the "Company") does hereby certify,  to the best of such officer's
knowledge, that:

      1. The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the  quarterly
      period  ended  March  31,  2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
      requirements  of Section 13(a) or Section  15(d),  as  applicable,  of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



                                                   / S Danghui ("David") Liu
Dated: March 22, 2005
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                        Danghui ("David") Liu,
                                                        Chief Executive Officer



                                                    / S Dorothy M. Cipolla
Dated: March 22, 2005
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                          Dorothy M. Cipolla,
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

      The  certifications  set forth  above are being  furnished  as an  exhibit
solely  pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United  States
Code,  and shall not be deemed to be "filed"  for  purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  nor  shall  they  be  deemed
incorporated  by reference in any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1934,  as
amended.

      A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 1350, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement required by Section 1350, has been provided to LaserSight Incorporated
and will be retained by LaserSight  Incorporated and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 228 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 228

Expressing support for the designation of May 7, 2015, as a ``National 
    Day of Reason'' and recognizing the importance of reason in the 
                        betterment of humanity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2015

    Mr. Honda (for himself and Ms. Norton) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of May 7, 2015, as a ``National 
    Day of Reason'' and recognizing the importance of reason in the 
                        betterment of humanity.

Whereas the application of reason has proven to offer hope for human survival 
        upon Earth, improving conditions within the universe, and cultivating 
        intelligent, moral, and ethical interactions among people and their 
        environments;
Whereas those who wrote the Constitution of the United States, the basic 
        document for governing the affairs of humankind within the United 
        States, based it upon principles delineated within the philosophies 
        distinguishing the historical Age of Reason;
Whereas most citizens of the United States purport to value reason and its 
        application;
Whereas it is the duty and responsibility of every citizen to promote the 
        development and application of reason; and
Whereas May 7, 2015, would be an appropriate date to designate as a ``National 
        Day of Reason'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``National Day of Reason''; 
        and
            (2) encourages all citizens, residents, and visitors to 
        join in observing this day and focusing upon the employment of 
        reason, critical thought, the scientific method, and free 
        inquiry to the resolution of human problems and for the welfare 
        of human kind.
                                 <all>
```