alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                           USN CORPORATION FORM 10-QSB
                     FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Terry Washburn, certify that

1.       I am the Chief Executive Officer and principal accounting officer of
         USN Corporation.

2.       Attached to this certification is Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
         December 31, 2004, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by
         the issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the
         "Exchange Act"), which contains condensed consolidated financial
         statements.

3.       I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
         pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

         o        The periodic report containing the condensed consolidated
                  financial statements fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

         o        The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the consolidated financial condition and
                  results of operations of the issuer for the periods presented.

July 28, 2005                                 /s/ Terry Washburn
                                              -----------------------------
                                              Terry Washburn
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              (and equivalent of CFO)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by USN Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.


                                       23
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 360 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of the National Collegiate Honors Council. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2015 

Mr. RUSSELL (for himself, Mr. BENISHEK, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. BOUSTANY, and Mr. COLE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of the National Collegiate 

Honors Council. 

Whereas the National Collegiate Honors Council supports 

honors education at more than 800 member colleges and 

universities, challenging over 325,000 high-achieving students from six regions in the United States and internationally; 

Whereas the National Collegiate Honors Council, with 50 

years of tradition in providing networking and support 

for professional honors staff, continues to define and hold 

true to the guiding principles of honors education; 

Whereas the National Collegiate Honors Council provides opportunities for Honors Directors and other professional 

staff to share best practices in honors education; 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 360 IH 

Whereas the National Collegiate Honors Council supports 

Honors Directors through numerous continuing education 

tracks, including specific options for beginning in honors, 

developing in honors, and best honors administrative 

practices; 

Whereas the National Collegiate Honors Council’s member 

organizations contribute to a collection of honors education best practices and provide consultation and publications for others researching honors education pedagogy; 

and 

Whereas the National Collegiate Honors Council, in support 

of its members, influences and provides unique and collaborative learning experiences in all academic disciplines: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the National Collegiate Honors 

3 Council, its officers, staff, members, institutions, 

4 and students on the 50th anniversary of the Council; 

5 (2) recognizes the members of the National Col6 legiate Honors Council for their continued hard 

7 work and devotion to educational excellence in high8 er education; and 

9 (3) congratulates the National Collegiate Hon10 ors Council for its distinguished history and long 

11 record of achievements. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3





                                   CERTIFICATE
                                 furnished under
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         I, Warner L. Baxter, chief financial officer of CILCORP Inc., hereby
certify that to the best of my knowledge, the accompanying Report of CILCORP
Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CILCORP
Inc.




                                                 /s/ Warner L. Baxter
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Warner L. Baxter
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CILCORP Inc. and will be retained by CILCORP Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
March 3, 2005

25245

#### State v. Sorino

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REPORTED ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             459
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (145)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,034
<PP&E>                                           1,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (902)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,757
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,643
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,288
<SALES>                                          4,737
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,940
<CGS>                                            3,752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (303)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (810)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (810)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
February 20, 2002

22998

#### Miyashiro v. Hiatt

Affirmed
183 P.3d 755

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

April 17, 2008

27534

#### Mussack v. State, Dept. of Educ.

Affirmed
July 30, 2008

28308

#### Soon Ja Choi v. State

Affirmed
EX-10.7.3



 Exhibit 10.7.3 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 

This AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of June 1, 2018, is made by and between
Navios Maritime Containers Inc., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the Marshall Islands (“NMCI”) and Navios ShipManagement Inc., a Marshall Islands corporation (“NSM”, and together with
NMLP, the “Parties”) and amends the Management Agreement (the “Management Agreement”) entered into among the Parties on June 7, 2017 (together, with the Management Agreement, the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given them in the Agreement. 
 WITNESSETH:

 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Schedule B, paragraph 1, is hereby amended and substituted in its entirety: 

 In consideration
for the provision of the Services listed in Schedule “A” by NSM to NMCI, NMCI shall, during the term of this Agreement, pay NSM a fixed daily fee of US$6,100 per day for container vessels up to 5,500 TEU, US$6,700 per day for
container vessels above 5,500 TEU and up to 8,000 TEU, and US$7,400 per day for container vessels above 8,000 TEU and up to 10,000 TEU, payable on the last day of each month. In addition, NMCI shall pay to NSM
dry-docking expenses at cost for each Vessel (together with the daily fee described in the preceding sentence and any applicable value added, sales or services taxes, the “Fees”). 

 

	2.	Full Force and Effect. Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 


 

	3.	Effect. Unless the context otherwise requires, the Agreement, as amended, and this Amendment shall be read together and shall have effect as if the provisions of the Agreement, as amended, and this Amendment were
contained in one agreement. After the effective date of this Amendment, all references in the Agreement to “this Agreement,” “hereto,” “hereof,” “hereunder” or words of like import referring to the Agreement
shall mean the Agreement, as amended, as further modified by this Amendment. 

  

	4.	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in separate counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute a single instrument. 


[Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature page to follow.] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective as of the day and
year first above written. 
  

	
	NAVIOS MARITIME CONTAINERS INC.
	
	/s/ Christos Christopoulos
	By: Christos Christopoulos
	Title: Chief Financial Officer
	
	NAVIOS SHIPMANAGEMENT INC.
	
	/s/ Vasiliki Papaefthymiou
	By: Vasiliki Papaefthymiou
	Title: Secretary/Director
89 P.3d 840

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### Winterborne v. State

24874

05/10/2004

Denied

104 Hawai'i 311, 88 P.3d 683
**Exhibit23**

** **

REPORTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Partners

Derby Housing AssociatesLimited Partnership

 

We have audited theaccompanying balance sheets of Derby Housing Associates Limited Partnership (“Partnership”)as of December 31, 2008 and the related statements of operations, partners’equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements arethe responsibility of the partnership’s management. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.  The financial statements of Derby HousingAssociates Limited Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2007, wereaudited by other auditors whose report thereon, dated February 15, 2008,expressed an unqualified opinion.

 

We conducted our audits inaccordance with the Standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit toobtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free ofmaterial misstatement. The Partnership has determined that it is not requiredto have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control overfinancial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control overfinancial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that areappropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing anopinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includesexamining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures inthe financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accountingprinciples used and significant estimates made by management, as well asevaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that ouraudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, thefinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all materialrespects, the financial position of Derby Housing Associates LimitedPartnership as of December 31, 2008 and the results of its operations,changes in partners’ equity and its cash flows for the years then ended, inconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Statesof America.

 

 

Summers, Spencer &Callison,

CPAs, Chartered

Topeka, Kansas

February 14, 2009

 

----
# C_2016202EN.01040101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/401 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/401

---

Article 36

Access to services of general economic interest

The Union recognises and respects access to services of general economic interest as provided for in national laws and practices, in accordance with the Treaties, in order to promote the social and territorial cohesion of the Union.

---
1

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2598

___________

Courtney D. Yorke, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Vinnell Corporation, doing business *

as Hubert H. Humphrey Job Corps, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: October 16, 2007

Filed: November 7, 2007

___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Courtney D. Yorke appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the

record and considered Yorke’s arguments for reversal, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B; Wallace v. DTG Operations, Inc., 442 F.3d 1112, 1117-18 (8th Cir. 2006)

(standard of review). We also deny Yorke’s pending motions. 

______________________________
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

In re: VINODH RAGHUBIR,

Petitioner

______________________

2020-128

______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States 

Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:20-cv-00388-EGB, Senior 

Judge Eric G. Bruggink.

______________________

ON PETITION

______________________

 

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Vinodh Raghubir currently has a case pending before 

the United States Court of Federal Claims. He now petitions for a writ of prohibition, asking this court to “prohibit 

conduct pursuant to ‘the conspiracy to predetermine the 

outcome of judicial proceedings’ throughout proceedings 

now involving the Federal Court of Claims.” 

Like a writ of mandamus, a writ of prohibition is a 

drastic remedy that is available only when a petitioner has 

a clear and indisputable right to relief and no adequate alternative legal channels through which to obtain that relief. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Dist. of 

Case: 20-128 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 06/18/2020
2 IN RE: RAGHUBIR

Columbia, 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004); In re Missouri, 664 

F.2d 178, 180 (8th Cir. 1981). Mr. Raghubir has not 

demonstrated that an appeal from an eventual final judgment of the Court of Federal Claims would be inadequate

or that he has a clear and indisputable right to relief. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition is denied.

June 18, 2020

Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

s24

Case: 20-128 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 06/18/2020
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 110 

Recognizing the self determination of Gibraltar to determine its status as 

a British Overseas Territory. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mr. HOLDING (for himself, Mr. NUNES, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, 

Mr. GRAYSON, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. MURPHY of Florida, Ms. WILSON of Florida, and Mr. ROONEY of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the self determination of Gibraltar to determine 

its status as a British Overseas Territory. 

Whereas the Department of State recognizes Gibraltar as an 

overseas territory of the United Kingdom based on the 

1713 Treaty of Utrecht; 

Whereas the citizens of Gibraltar have freely and democratically expressed their view to remain a British Overseas 

Territory in 1967 and 2002 when 99.6 and 98.48 percent 

of the Gibraltarians, respectively, voted in a popular 

referenda their wish to remain a British Overseas Territory; 

Whereas the United States has relied on Gibraltar’s military 

facilities numerous times, including America’s first overVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:51 Feb 13, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR110.IH HR110

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 110 IH 

seas military intervention in 1801 against the Barbary 

States, World War II, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization intervention in 2011 in Libya; 

Whereas, during World War II, General Dwight Eisenhower 

used Gibraltar as his headquarters to plan the liberation 

of North Africa stating, ‘‘Without it the vital air cover 

would not have been quickly established on the North African fields.’’; 

Whereas the security situation in North Africa and the Middle East continues to underscore the need for the United 

States to maintain secure access to Gibraltar’s military 

facilities; 

Whereas Gibraltar has the right, under the United Nations 

Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to determine its own future; and 

Whereas the United Kingdom is a loyal ally that has stood 

by the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the United States honors the contribution 

4 that Gibraltar has made to advancing United States 

5 security interests in the Mediterranean region since 

6 1801 and extends its deepest appreciation and 

7 thanks to the Government of Gibraltar and its citi8 zens; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 110 IH 

1 (2) the views and rights of Gibraltarians should 

2 always be imperative in any discussion of Gibraltar’s 

3 status as a British Overseas Territory. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6335

NICHOLAS WARNER JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS DUSING; WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN; JANE DOE;JOHN DOE; PATRICK CONROY; ANGELO LEE, Lieutenant C.O. IV; DEBRA HOOD, Nurse; JULIUSBOATENG, M.D.; EMSA CORRECTIONAL CARE, INCORPORATED; JOHN MOSS; JACK KAVANAGH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00- 1644-L) Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 23, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nicholas Warner Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,Attorney General, Sharon Stanley Street, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Donald Joseph Crawford, GODARD, WEST & ADELMAN, P.C., Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Nicholas Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint, and a subsequent order denying as moot his motion to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Dusing , No. CA-00- 1644-L (D. Md. filed Feb. 14, 2001, entered Feb. 15, 2001; filedFeb. 21, 2001, entered Feb. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Sheila Lane (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 16, 2021 - 9:10amI cried reading this. From the bottom of my heart, thank you all for all your hard work. The People's House is your house in a very special way, and you're amazing at taking care of it.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe