Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 120 / Thursday, June 21, 2012 / Proposed Rules 37361 

5.2.3 allow APCO- and EPA-approved 

alternative mitigation measures that 

demonstrate at least 19%, 60%, or 80% 

reduction in VOC. However, these 

sections do not specify the test methods 

that will be used to demonstrate these 

VOC control efficiencies. EPA 

recommends that the next revision to 

SJVUAPCD Rule 4566 include the 

appropriate test methods and test 

protocol guidelines to determine 

percent VOC reduction (See, for 

example, South Coast Rule 1133.3). 

Finally, we recommend that, in order to 

determine compliance with the 5,000 

tons per year foodwaste threshold and 

other percentage requirements, the 

SCAQMD add daily recordkeeping 

requirements for each type of raw 

material received, including the dates 

and amounts of the following: 

Foodwaste received, greenwaste 

received, manure received, and their 

monthly totals. 

The TSDs describe additional rule 

revisions that we recommend for the 

next time the local agencies modify the 

rules but are not currently the basis for 

rule disapproval. 

D. Public Comment and Final Action 

Because EPA believes the submitted 

rules fulfill all relevant requirements, 

we are proposing to fully approve them 

as described in section 110(k)(3) of the 

Act. We will accept comments from the 

public on this proposal for the next 30 

days. Unless we receive convincing new 

information during the comment period, 

we intend to publish a final approval 

action that will incorporate these rules 

into the federally enforceable SIP. 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this proposed action 

merely proposes to approve State law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by State law. For 

that reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address 

disproportionate human health or 

environmental effects with practical, 

appropriate, and legally permissible 

methods under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed action does 

not have tribal implications as specified 

by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: May 25, 2012. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2012–15196 Filed 6–20–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 63 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0708; FRL–9690–8] 

RIN 2060–AQ58 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for 

Reciprocating Internal Combustion 

Engines; New Source Performance 

Standards for Stationary Internal 

Combustion Engines 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule; Notice of public 

hearing; Extension of public comment 

period. 

SUMMARY: The EPA published in the 

Federal Register on June 7, 2012, the 

proposed rule, ‘‘National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

for Reciprocating Internal Combustion 

Engines; New Source Performance 

Standards for Stationary Internal 

Combustion Engines.’’ The EPA was 

asked to hold a public hearing. 

Therefore, the EPA is making two 

announcements: First, a public hearing 

for the proposed, ‘‘National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

for Reciprocating Internal Combustion 

Engines; New Source Performance 

Standards for Stationary Internal 

Combustion Engines’’ will be held on 

July 10, 2012, and second, the comment 

period for the proposed rule will be 

extended until August 9, 2012. 

DATES: The public hearing will be held 

on July 10, 2012. Comments must be 

received by August 9, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be 

held in Room 1152 EPA East, 1201 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20460, (202) 564–1657. 

The public hearing will convene at 

10:00 a.m. and will continue until 4:00 

p.m. A lunch break is scheduled from 

12:00 p.m. until 1:00 p.m. The EPA’s 

Web site for the rulemaking, which 

includes the proposal and information 

about the hearing, can be found at: 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/rice/ricepg.

html. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you would like to present oral testimony 

at the public hearing, please contact Ms. 

Pamela Garrett, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality 

Planning and Standards, Sector Policies 

and Programs Division (D243–01), 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 

27711; telephone: (919) 541–7966; fax 

number: (919) 541–5450; email address: 

garrett.pamela@epa.gov (preferred 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
37362 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 120 / Thursday, June 21, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

method for registering). The last day to 

register to present oral testimony in 

advance will be Friday, July 6, 2012. If 

using email, please provide the 

following information: The time you 

wish to speak (morning or afternoon), 

name, affiliation, address, email address 

and telephone and fax numbers. Time 

slot preferences will be given in the 

order requests are received. 

Additionally, requests to speak will be 

taken the day of the hearing at the 

hearing registration desk, although 

preferences on speaking times may not 

be able to be fulfilled. If you require the 

service of a translator, please let us 

know at the time of registration. 

Questions concerning the proposed 

rule should be addressed to Ms. Melanie 

King, Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards, Sector Policies and Programs 

Division (D243–01), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Research Triangle 

Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone 

number: (919) 541–2469; facsimile 

number: (919) 541–5450; email address: 

king.melanie@epa.gov. 

Public hearing: The proposal for 

which the EPA is holding the public 

hearing was published in the Federal 

Register on June 7, 2012, and is 

available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/

pkg/FR-2012-06-07/pdf/2012-13193.pdf 

and also in the docket identified below. 

The public hearing will provide 

interested parties the opportunity to 

present oral comments regarding the 

EPA’s proposed standards, including 

data, views or arguments concerning the 

proposal. The EPA may ask clarifying 

questions during the oral presentations, 

but will not respond to the 

presentations at that time. Written 

statements and supporting information 

submitted during the comment period 

will be considered with the same weight 

as any oral comments and supporting 

information presented at the public 

hearing. 

Commenters should notify Ms. Garrett 

if they will need specific equipment or 

if there are other special needs related 

to providing comments at the public 

hearing. The EPA will provide 

equipment for commenters to make 

computerized slide presentations if we 

receive special requests in advance. Oral 

testimony will be limited to 5 minutes 

for each commenter. The EPA 

encourages commenters to submit to the 

docket a copy of their oral testimony 

electronically (via email or CD) or in 

hard copy form. 

The public hearing schedule, 

including lists of speakers, will be 

posted on the EPA’s Web site at: http:// 

www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/rice/ricepg.html. 

A verbatim transcript of the hearing and 

written statements will be included in 

the docket for the rulemaking. The EPA 

will make every effort to follow the 

schedule as closely as possible on the 

day of the hearing; however, please plan 

for the hearing to run either ahead of 

schedule or behind schedule. 

How can I get copies of this document 

and other related information? 

The EPA has established a docket for 

the proposed rule, 

‘‘National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for 

Reciprocating Internal Combustion 

Engines; New Source Performance 

Standards for Stationary Internal 

Combustion Engines’’ under Docket ID 

No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0708, 

available at www.regulations.gov. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Hazardous 

substances, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: June 15, 2012. 

Mary E. Henigin, 

Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning 

and Standards. 

[FR Doc. 2012–15206 Filed 6–20–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 1 and 64 

[CG Docket No. 12–129; FCC 12–56] 

Implementation of the Middle Class 

Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 

2012; Establishment of a Public Safety 

Answering Point Do-Not-Call Registry 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the 

Commission initiates a proceeding to 

create a Do-Not-Call registry for public 

safety answering points (PSAPs) as 

required by the ‘‘Middle Class Tax 

Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012’’ 

(Tax Relief Act). Specifically, section 

6507 of the Tax Relief Act requires the 

Commission, among other things, to 

establish a registry that allows PSAPs to 

register telephone numbers on a Do-NotCall list and prohibit the use of 

automatic dialing equipment to contact 

those numbers. Therefore, the 

Commission seeks comment on a variety 

of issues relating to the establishment 

and ongoing management of the PSAP 

registry. The proposed rules are 

designed to address concerns about the 

use automatic dialing equipment, which 

can generate large numbers of phone 

calls in a short period of time, tie up 

public safety lines, divert critical 

responder resources away from 

emergency services, and impede access 

by the public to emergency lines. 

DATES: Interested parties may file 

comments on or before July 23, 2012. 

Reply comments are due on or before 

August 6, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by CG Docket No. 12–129, by 

any of the following methods: 

Electronic Filers: Comments may be 

filed electronically using the Internet by 

accessing the Commission’s Electronic 

Comment Filing System (ECFS), through 

the Commission’s Web site: http:// 

fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Filers should 

follow the instructions provided on the 

Web site for submitting comments. For 

ECFS filers, in completing the 

transmittal screen, filers should include 

their full name, U.S. Postal service 

mailing address, and CG Docket No. 12– 

129. 

Paper Filers: Parties who choose to 

file by paper must file an original and 

four copies of each filing. Filings can be 

sent by hand or messenger delivery, by 

commercial overnight courier, or by 

first-class or overnight U.S. Postal 

Service mail (although the Commission 

continues to experience delays in 

receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All 

filings must be addressed to the 

Commission’s Secretary, Office of the 

Secretary, Federal Communications 

Commission. 

All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the 

Commission’s Secretary must be 

delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 

12th St. SW., Room TW–A325, 

Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours 

are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand 

deliveries must be held together with 

rubber bands or fasteners. Any 

envelopes and boxes must be disposed 

of before entering the building. 

Commercial overnight mail (other 

than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail 

and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 

East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, 

MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service firstclass, Express, and Priority mail must be 

addressed to 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

In addition, parties must serve one 

copy of each pleading with the 

Commission’s duplicating contractor, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 

Street SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, or via email to 

fcc@bcpiweb.com. 

For detailed instructions for 

submitting comments and additional 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS