alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


                               


<ARTICLE>                                                                   5
       
<S>                                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                      MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                              1,762,430
<SECURITIES>                                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       8,766,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        1,158,961
<INVENTORY>                                                         3,189,394
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   14,223,362
<PP&E>                                                              2,946,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        945,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     36,510,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               5,306,013
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                                9,085
<OTHER-SE>                                                         29,447,814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       36,510,144
<SALES>                                                             6,518,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    6,518,142
<CGS>                                                               2,448,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       2,448,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    4,646,191
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       59,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     59,643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (648,022)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (648,022)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (648,022)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          (0.07)
        



</TABLE>
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Lycurgus, Relief Portrait
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
C. Paul Jennewein

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1950

Location
      
House Chamber

Lycurgus (c. 900 B.C.) Semimythical Greek legislator. Traditional author of laws and institution of Sparta.

The 23 marble relief portraits over the gallery doors of the House Chamber in the U.S. Capitol depict historical figures noted for their work in establishing the principles that underlie American law. They were installed when the chamber was remodeled in 1949-1950. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 135 

Encouraging people in the United States to recognize March 2, 2015, as 

Read Across America Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2015 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois (for himself and Mrs. DAVIS of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging people in the United States to recognize March 

2, 2015, as Read Across America Day. 

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education 

and professional success, and is a source of pleasure 

throughout life; 

Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read 

if the United States is to remain competitive in the global 

economy; 

Whereas Congress has placed great emphasis on reading 

intervention and providing additional resources for reading assistance, including through the programs authorized by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) and through annual appropriations for library and literacy programs; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 135 IH 

Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned 

about reading and education have joined with the National Education Association (NEA) to use March 2 to 

celebrate reading and the birth of Theodor Geisel, also 

known as Dr. Seuss: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. 

3 Seuss, for his success in encouraging children to dis4 cover the joy of reading; 

5 (2) honors the 18th anniversary of Read Across 

6 America Day; 

7 (3) encourages parents to read with their chil8 dren for at least 30 minutes on Read Across Amer9 ica Day in honor of the commitment of the House 

10 of Representatives to building a Nation of readers; 

11 and 

12 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

13 to observe Read Across America Day with appro14 priate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit










AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SHAREHOLDERS’ AGREEMENT
This Amendment No. 1, dated as of June 29, 2018 (this “Amendment”), to the Shareholders’ Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2004 (the “Agreement”), is made between Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd., a company organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (the “Company”), and David Einhorn (the “Shareholder”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”) has determined it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to extend the expiration date of the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to its authority under Section 15 of the Agreement, the Committee has authorized and approved this Amendment as of the date hereof.


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements herein set forth in this Amendment, the parties hereby agree as follows:


1.    Section 15(c) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


“(c) Term and Termination. 


This Agreement may be terminated at any time by an instrument in writing signed by all of the parties hereto. This Agreement shall terminate automatically as to any Shareholder that Transfers all of its equity securities of the Company. The provisions of Sections 2, 3 and 14 of this Agreement, other than Section 2(d) of this Agreement shall terminate automatically as to all parties hereto upon the consummation of an IPO. Unless sooner terminated, this Agreement shall terminate on June 30, 2021, unless, at any time within one (1) year prior to such date, all of the parties extend its duration for as many additional periods, each not to exceed ten (10) years, as they may desire.”


2.    This Amendment shall be deemed to be a contract made under the law of the State of New York and for all purposes shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of such State applicable to contracts to be made and performed entirely within such State.


3.      This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. A signature to this Amendment transmitted electronically shall have the same authority, effect and enforceability as an original signature. This Amendment shall be effective as of the Close of Business on the date hereof.


[Signature Page Follows]













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.
By:  /s/ Laura Accurso    
Name: Laura Accurso
Title: General Counsel






DAVID EINHORN, as Shareholder
By: /s/ David Einhorn    
Name: David Einhorn
#### State v. Ugalino

25545

05/05/2005

Denied

107 Hawai'i 144, 111 P.3d 39
EXHIBIT 15.1



LOGO

March 30, 2012

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C.

20549-7561 USA

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have read Item 16F of MFC Industrial Ltd.s Form 20-F dated March 30, 2012, and have the following comments:



|1. | We agree with the statements made in paragraphs two, three and four in the section Change in Registrants Certifying Accountant 
Resignation of a Member of NEXIA International, Davidson & Company LLP.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yours very truly,

DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP

DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP

Chartered Accountants



LOGO

1200  609 Granville Street, P.O. Box 10372, Pacific Centre, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V7Y 1G6

Telephone (604) 687-0947 Fax (604) 687-6172
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6377

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

EMILIO CHASE, a/k/a E, a/k/a Dominic Mario Chase, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, 

Chief District Judge. (3:04-cr-00042-JPB-JES-1) 

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 24, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished by per curiam opinion. 

Emilio Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Emilio Chase appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chase, 

No. 3:04-cr-00042-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 20, 2009). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
# C_2016202EN.01033701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/337 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/337

---

3.   Declaration on Article 8 of the Treaty on European Union

Declaration on Article 8 of the Treaty on European Union

The Union will take into account the particular situation of small-sized countries which maintain specific relations of proximity with it.

---
H. Res. 165 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 24, 2015. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Palazzo. 

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Russell. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1527 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to enter into contracts and agreements for the placement of 

veterans in non-Department medical foster homes for certain veterans 

who are unable to live independently. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2019 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana (for himself, Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto 

Rico, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. BARR, and Mr. CORREA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to enter into contracts 

and agreements for the placement of veterans in nonDepartment medical foster homes for certain veterans 

who are unable to live independently. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Long-Term Care Vet5 erans Choice Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1527 IH

1 SEC. 2. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS CONTRACT AU2 THORITY FOR PLACEMENT OF VETERANS IN 

3 NON-DEPARTMENT MEDICAL FOSTER HOMES. 

4 (a) AUTHORITY.—Section 1720 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(h)(1) During the three-year period beginning on 

8 October 1, 2020, and subject to paragraph (2), at the re9 quest of a veteran for whom the Secretary is required to 

10 provide nursing home care under section 1710A of this 

11 title, the Secretary may place the veteran in a medical fos12 ter home that meets Department standards, at the ex13 pense of the United States, pursuant to a contract, agree14 ment, or other arrangement entered into between the Sec15 retary and the medical foster home for such purpose. A 

16 veteran who is placed in a medical foster home under this 

17 subsection shall agree, as a condition of such placement, 

18 to accept home health services furnished by the Secretary 

19 under section 1717 of this title. 

20 ‘‘(2) In any year, not more than a daily average of 

21 900 veterans placed in a medical foster home, whether 

22 placed before or after the date of the enactment of this 

23 subsection, may have their care covered at the expense of 

24 the United States under subsection (a). 

25 ‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘medical foster 

26 home’ means a home designed to provide non-institutional, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1527 IH

1 long-term, supportive care for veterans who are unable to 

2 live independently and prefer a family setting.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (h) of section 

4 1720 of title 38, United States Code, as added by sub5 section (a), shall take effect on October 1, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### State v. Huddleston

25632

02/09/2005

Affirmed
#### Bobbitt v. Chow

24768

01/30/2003

Affirmed
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 25, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00728

- CV

Gary DANIELS

, Appellant

v.

Alissa DANIELS

, Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texa s

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 20628

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Emergency Stay is hereby DENIED.

________________________ Rebeca C. Mar tinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of October, 2019

.

___________________________________ LUZ ESTRADA

, Chief Deputy Clerk
# C_2016202EN.01039901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/399 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/399

---

Article 31

Fair and just working conditions

1.   Every worker has the right to working conditions which respect his or her health, safety and dignity.

2.   Every worker has the right to limitation of maximum working hours, to daily and weekly rest periods and to an annual period of paid leave.

---
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

August 5, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00338

- CR

Elias Esequiel VASQUEZ

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas Trial Court No. 11

- CRS

- 270 Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due on April 9, 2014 . Appellant has been granted three extensions of time

— for a total of 110 days

— in which to file the brief. Our last order stated that no further extensions of time would be granted. Despite this admonition, appellant has filed a fourth motion for extension of time requesting an additional 14

- day extension

.

The motion is GRANTED. W e ORDER appellant’s attor ney to file the appellant ’s brief on or before August 13, 2014. No further extensions of time will be considered. If appellant’s brief is not filed by that date, we will abate this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38 .8(b)(2). Contempt proceedings may also be initiated against appellant’s attorney. Id. 38.8(b)(4).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  William Wood (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 15, 2021 - 7:10pmGreat job team! As usual AOC employees come thru!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Order filed April 21, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00137-CV

____________

ISAURA MORALES AND FRANCISCO TORO, Appellants

V.

KARLA VACA AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR ALBERTO L. VACA, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14-CCV-052415

O R D E R

Appellants’ brief was due March 30, 2015. No brief or motion for extension 

of time has been filed. 

Unless appellants file a brief with this court on or before May 21, 2015, the 

court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*KENYATTA WOODS

(AC 17664)

Landau, Mihalakos and Spallone, Js.

*817Argued November 1, 1999

officially released July 18, 2000

*Eugene P. Falco,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Ronald G. Weller,*assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were *Michael Dearington,*state’s attorney, and *James Dinnan,*senior assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

*Opinion*

SPALLONE, J.

The defendant, Kenyatta Woods, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-59 (a) (1) and 53a-8, carrying a pistol without a permit in violation of General Statutes § 29-35 and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (1). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly declined to deliver a Secondino1 missing witness instruction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*818The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court improperly refused to instruct the jury, pursuant to *Secondino*v. *New Haven Gas Co.,*147 Conn. 672, 675, 165 A.2d 598 (1960), that it could draw an adverse inference from the state’s failure to call a witness. Subsequent to the trial court’s decision in the present case, but prior to oral argument in the Appellate Court, our Supreme Court decided *State*v. *Malave,*250 Conn. 722, 737 A.2d 442 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1170, 120 S. Ct. 1195, 145 L. Ed. 2d 1099 (2000).

In *Malave,*our Supreme Court revisited the rule that allowed a jury to draw an adverse inference from the failure of a party to call a particular witness and concluded that “the time has come to abandon the missing witness rule.” Id., 738. The *Malave*decision applies retroactively to this case. *State*v. *Quinones,*56 Conn. App. 529, 533, 745 A.2d 191 (2000).

The trial court here declined to give the *Secondino*missing witness instruction. In view of *Malave,*we need not analyze whether that decision was correct because the defendant was not entitled to the instruction under any circumstances. See *State*v. *Bailey,*56 Conn. App. 760, 762, 746 A.2d 194 (2000). *Malave*also renders it unnecessary for us to recite the facts of this case. Such recitation would serve no useful purpose because the only claim raised by the defendant concerns an eviden-tiary rule that is no longer viable in Connecticut.

The judgment is affirmed.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.

1

*Secondino*v. *New Haven Gas Co.,*147 Conn. 672, 165 A.2d 598 (1960).
##### 



Exhibit 32.3
  SECTION 1350
    CERTIFICATION
    OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
    (required by Section 906 of the
    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  Form 10-K Form 10-K),
  (1)
    The
    Form 10-K
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
    or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the
    Form 10-K
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date: March 1,
    2007