alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the first amended Quarterly Report of Franklin Lake Resources
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fr. Gregory Ofiesh, President, CEO and Acting Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



December 3, 2003                              /S/ Gregory Ofiesh
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Fr. Gregory Ofiesh
                                              President and CEO
                                              Acting Chief Financial Officer
# •

gablepr March 14, 2012 The Honorable Ray LaHood U.S . DepaIiment ofTranspOliation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Alaska Airlines' application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029. Dear Secretary LaHood: On behalfofour public relations finn and the defense, biotech, phannaceutical and high-tech companies we work with, many with offices in Washington, DC, we fully support the application ofAlaska Airlines for air service between San Diego and Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). The service would provide an immediate and major benefit to the frequent travelers who nowinust go through Dulles, or Baltimore ifthey are trying to watch their budgets. SaIl Diego to Dulles average airfares are the highest ofwest coast cities. To make matters worse, there is the cost oftaxi service from Dulles to downtown Washington ($60 each way) and the wasted time. Beyond the private sector, San Diego has the most active-duty military personnel of any region in our country. San Diego's significant Defense Department presence needs the quick access to the Pentagon that nonstop air service can provide. Alaska Airlines service would add a needed nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washington, DC. Gable PRjoins with the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, the World Trade Center San Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber ofCommerce in support ofAJaska Airlines ' application for San Diego

- DCA slots. Sincerely,

591 cam i no de la reina 1suite 730 I san diego, ca 92108 1 phone 619.284 .17141 fax 619.299.1030 1results@gablepr
.com 1www.gablepr.com
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2279

___________ Yacoub Quomsieh; Muna Quomsieh; * Hanin Quomsieh; Nadeen Quomsieh; * Balquees Quomsieh; Jeries Quomsieh; * Danial Quomsieh, * * Petitioners, * * Petition for Review from the v. * Board of Immigration Appeals. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General * of the United States of America, * * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: April 14, 2008 Filed: April 18, 2008

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Yacoub Quomsieh and his family, Palestinian Christians from the West Bank, seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their motion to reopen their removal proceed ings. They contend that changed circumstances—that the Hamas organization ha s taken over control of the Palestinian-2- Authority—warrant the grant of an untimel y motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review. The Quomsiehs entered the United States in 2001, and, in January 2002, they filed their petitions for asylum, withhol ding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. An Immigration Judge (IJ) denied their petitions, and the BIA affirmed the IJ’s decision. A pa nel of this court denied the Quomsiehs’ petitions for review in March 2007. See Quomsieh v. Gonzales , 479 F.3d 602 (8th Cir. 2007). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in finding that the Quomsiehs failed to establish changed circumstances which would justify reopening the removal proceedings. Alemu v. Mukasey , 509 F.3d 907, 909 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review). “[M]otions to reopen are di sfavored because they undermine the government’s legitimate interest in finality . . . .” Id. Thus, the Attorney General retains considerable discretion over such mo tions, and that discretion is abused only where the BIA “gives no rational explan ation for its decision; departs from its established policies without explanation; relies on impermissible factors or legal error; or ignores or distorts th e record evidence.” Id. (citations omitted). The evidence the Quomsiehs submitted with their motion includes articles discussing the Hamas takeover of the Pa lestinian Authority. In reviewing this evidence and a State Department report on the status of religious relations in Israel and the Occupied Territories, the BIA c oncluded that while there were “tensions between Christians and Muslims . . . th e new Palestinian Authority (PA) government ha[d] taken steps to eliminate religious in citement.” This finding is a reasonable interpretation of the evidence presente d by the Quomsiehs and from the State Department report, and the evidence does not show that the territory has undergone a material change in circumstances. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

______________________________
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Public Accountants

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Central and South West
Corporation:

      As independent public accountants,  we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated February 25, 2000,  included in this Form 10-K, into Central
and South West Corporation's  previously filed  registration  statements on Form
S-8  (File  Nos.  33-49301,  33-63027  and  33-64233)  and on Form S-3 (File No.
333-00911).

Arthur Andersen LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 21, 2000


                                      4-22
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10Q-A AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,116
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  800,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          33,239
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 860,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        429,842
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           392
<OTHER-SE>                                     275,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   860,280
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,075
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,466
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,851
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (3,976)
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,875
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Michael T. Mino, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of T-3 Energy Services, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.      */*s/MICHAEL T. MINO  Michael T. Mino   Chief Financial Officer   May 5, 2005
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Susie Skelton Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Norway Maple

Year
    2005

Location
      
Capitol Square, S.W.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text on the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Memorial Tree

*Acer platanoides 'emerald queen'*
(Norway Maple var. Emerald Queen)

In Memory of Susie Skelton
Wife of Rep. Ike Skelton of Missouri

Planted by
House Leader Nancy Pelosi

October 20, 2005 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CESAR SAVIEL SALINAS-TINOCO,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-13-00310-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 7

of Dallas County, Texas 

(TC# F-1222231-Y)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter=s third request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter=s Record until February 23, 2014. NO FURTHER REQUESTS 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER=S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Sharon Hazlewood, Court Reporter for the Criminal District 

Court No. 7, for Dallas County, Texas, prepare the Reporter=s Record for the above styled and 

numbered cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before February 23, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of February, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

CITES (Endangered Plant Species)

Last Modified: 

Print

The USDA is responsible for enforcing regulations specific to the import and export

of plants regulated by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species

of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) as well as the Endangered Species Act (ESA). 

If you are in the business of importing, exporting or re-exporting CITES or ESA

regulated plants and plant products, USDA regulation 7 CFR 355 requires that you

possess a valid USDA Protected Plant Permit. Importers of live plants and seeds must

also obtain permits under the USDA's nursery stock regulation. CITES listed plants

and plant products must enter the United States through a "Designated Port".

In addition to USDA permits, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) issues export

and re-export permits for CITES or ESA-protected plants leaving the United States.

FWS also requires import permits for wild collected CITES Appendix l species.

There is a fee of $70.00 for the Protected Plant Permit. We require a check or money

order made payable to Plant Protection and Quarantine.

CITES-Regulated Plants 

View the list of CITES-regulated plants.
ESA-Regulated Plants 

View the list of plants regulated by ESA.
Required Permit Applications

Importing CITES/ESA-Regulated Timber or Timber Products 

If you are engaging in the business of importing CITES/ESA regulated timber or

timber products, complete PPQ Form 621 and PPQ Form 585.

Importing CITES/ESA-Regulated Plants 

If you are engaging in the business of importing CITES/ESA regulated plants,

complete PPQ Form 621 and PPQ Form 587.

General Information

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Agricultural Inspection Port Contacts for CITESRelated Matters
Frequently Asked Questions

How long does it take for a permit to be issued? 

It can take up to 30 days for a permit to be processed. Please apply 30 days before

your first shipment arrives. 

Can I apply for the Protected Plant Permit online? 

You can apply online for a protected plant permit. 

Do I need to apply for a permit for every shipment? 

No. The Protected Plant Permit is valid for two years and covers additional shipments

of CITES/ESA material until the permit expires.

Contact Us

CITES and ESA

For questions about CITES (endangered plant species)

CITES Team

Phone: 301-851-2347

For questions about Protected Plant Permits or PPQ Form 621

CITES and ESA Permits

Email: PPQCITESESAPermits@usda.gov

Phone: 301-851-2046

CITES (Endangered Plant Species) Contacts
QUINTARIUS SHORTER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3242

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 7, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Barbara K. Hobbs , Judge

.

Baya Harrison, III, Monticello , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply606Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Katya Miller (... (not verified)PermalinkNovember 11, 2018 - 6:40pmThanks for explaining many terms such as allegories, and the role of woman in Capitol Art. I am writing a book about the Statue of Freedom and will go more into depth with Thomas Crawford and the times when the statue was designed and placed on the Dome. A US Capitol Fellowship allowed for in depth time to research in the Curators office and Library of Congress.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**Exhibit 32.2**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of infoUSA Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.   Date: November 13, 2003 */s/ Raj Das*
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Plant and Plant Product Imports

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS regulates the import of plants and plant products into the United States to

protect the health and value of America's agriculture.

I Want To...

Use our guides below to make sure you're importing safely and legally and help the

process go smoothly.

Import a plant or plant product into the United States 

Ship a plant or plant product through the United States on its way to another country

Moving plants, products, or soil through the United States or stopping at a port of

entry? Learn APHIS' regulations to transit your products safely and legally.

Notify the United States of an incoming approved shipment of plants or plant

products 

As a traveler, bring plants or plant products into the mainland United States from

Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or another country 

If you're traveling, keep in mind that there are restrictions on the foods and

agricultural products you can bring with you.

Buy plants or seeds online 
Sell plants or seeds online 

Understand requirements followed by airport and airline caterers or retailers 

Participate in the Offshore Greenhouse Certification Program 

Import Plants from Canada under the U.S.-Canada Greenhouse Grown Plant

Certification Program 

Participate in the Ralstonia Exclusion Program 

APHIS is implementing an updated framework for importing all Ralstonia

solanacearum race 3 biovar 2 host commodities into the United States.

Get Help With an Importing Issue

My shipment is on hold

The plant I want to import is endangered

Need help with a different importing issue?

Visit Our Trade Contacts Directory
EXHIBIT 21

                SUBSIDIARIES OF STANDARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION



                                                             STATE
                                         PERCENTAGE OF   OR COUNTRY IN
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                        OUTSTANDING   WHICH ORGANIZED

Standard Life Insurance Company of Indiana    100%          Indiana
Dixie National Life Insurance Company        99.4%          Mississippi
Standard Marketing Corporation                100%          Indiana
Standard Marketing International, Ltd.        100%          Bermuda
Standard Investor Services Corporation        100%          Indiana
Standard Administrative Services, Inc.        100%          Indiana
Standard Management International S.A.        100%          Luxembourg
Premier Life (Luxembourg) S.A.                100%          Luxembourg
Premier Life (Bermuda) Limited                100%          Bermuda




<PAGE>
#### State v. Domingo

16793

4/29/96

Granted

- Hawai'i -, - P.2d -