alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Alice Powell et al., as Executors of Edwin C. Shea, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Richmond County,

May 27, 1959.

*871
      *K. Konfried Otto*for petitioners.

*John P. MacFvoy*for Alonzo Cole and another, objectants.

*Charles J. D’Arrigo,*as special guardian for unknown distributees.

John C. Boyian, S.

In this contested accounting proceeding a construction of the will is necessary to determine what person or persons the legacy bequeathed to Gussie Cole, deceased, is distributable. The testator died on October 18, 1956, and his will, dated November 27, 1953, was admitted to probate on July 23, 1957. He made a number of specific bequests and then provided in paragraph fourteenth the following: ‘ ‘ All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, both real and personal and wherever situate, I give devise and bequeath to Gussie Cole, my Aunt, to Alice Powell and Betty Jane Kelly, my nieces, to William Franklin Androvette, my nephew and to Mary Collins Shea, my sister-in-law, share and share alike, to have and to hold for their own use and benefit forever.”

All of the parties mentioned in the above-quoted residuary clause survived the testator except Gussie Cole. Since the gift to her was made in the residuary clause and she predeceased the testator the legacy given to her lapsed. The testator having failed to make any other provision in his will in the event of the failure of his aunt, Gussie Cole, to survive him, the lapsed legacy is deemed to have been undisposed of and passes as property left in intestacy *(Kerr*v. *Dougherty,*79 N. Y. 327; *Matter of Tamargo,*220 N. Y. 225; *Matter of Foster, 174*Misc. 933; *Matter of Horner, 82*N. Y. S. 2d 491).

The court having considered the proofs submitted finds that the only person who would have taken in ease of intestacy would have been Henry Shea, if alive. However, the proof established that the last time he was seen by any member of *872his family was about 49 years ago, on or about 1910. At that time he was approximately 60 years old and unmarried. In 1915 efforts were made by his family to locate him, but they proved futile. The evidence established that the said Henry Shea disappeared in the year 1910; that he did not attend any wedding or funeral for any member of his family since, and none of his friends, acquaintances or relatives have heard from him. These circumstances are sufficient to raise the legal presumption that he was dead after seven years from the date of his disappearance in 1910; that as a result he is deemed to have predeceased the testator and died intestate and without issue. *(Barson*v. *Mulligan, 191*N. Y. 306; Abbott, Trial Evidence [4th ed.], pp. 133-142.)

The court is satisfied from the proofs submitted that the only distributees who survived the decedent were Alonzo Cole and Minnie Cole Bright and that they share equally in the one-fifth part of the residuary bequeathed to Gussie Cole and which lapsed by reason of the fact that she predeceased the decedent as aforesaid.

All other objections having been withdrawn, submit decree settling account on notice and in accordance herewith.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusCapitol Hill Facts
How many women are represented in the National Statuary Hall Collection?
        
                  There are twelve women currently represented.Dr. Mary McLeod Bethune (Florida)Willa Cather (Nebraska)Amelia Earhart (Kansas)Mother Joseph (Washington)Helen Keller (Alabama)Esther Hobart Morris (Wyoming)Jeannette Rankin (Montana)Dr. Florence Sabin (Colorado)Sakakawea (North Dakota)Maria Sanford (Minnesota)Frances E. Willard (Illinois)Sarah Winnemucca (Nevada) Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Terra Incognita
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

EverGreene Painting Studios

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1994

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

The map is inscribed "Terra Incognita" (Latin for "Unknown Territory"). On it, the names of the original Native American tribes of the eastern coast of North America appear in the tribes' approximate geographic locations. This first map shows the edge of the continent before the arrival of Columbus, whose three ships are depicted crossing the ocean.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The western north-south corridor, called the Westward Expansion corridor, includes maps and scenes showing the growth of the United States from early exploration through the acquisition of Alaska and Hawaii. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
18496

#### State v. Heinrich

Affirmed
18873

#### State v. Nicolas

Reversed
147 P.3d 74

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Shivaraman.

27594

11/06/2006

Affirmed
September 3, 2015

Mr. Joe Bulleit

1341 Slate Run Road

New Albany, IN 47150

Dear Mr. Bulleit:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2),

91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can 

not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your May 8, 2015, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−1844, but 

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,982,122
<SECURITIES>                                   183,482
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,016,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,182,424
<PP&E>                                      17,594,880
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,570,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,206,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          262,669
<BONDS>                                      1,871,613
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,072,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,206,971
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               821,020
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               736,947
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,937
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             51,937
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,937
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2014-0627

Directorate Identifier: 2013NM217AD

382-57-82 --- 12/7/04

382-57-82, R1 – 2/24/05

382-57-82, R2 – 2/15/07

382-57-82, R5 – 8/12/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00122-CV

Metroplex Skirting Decks & More, L.L.C., Appellant

v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GN201736, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant Metroplex Skirting Decks & More, L.L.C. filed with this Court a motion to dismiss, informing this Court that the parties have reached a complete and final settlem e nt of all
matters raised in the lawsuit. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Jan P. Patterson, Justice Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: August 29, 2003
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Vinod Gupta, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of *info*USA Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 9, 2005 /s/ *Vinod Gupta*   Vinod Gupta   Chief Executive Officer
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

301 Fannin, Room 245

Houston, Texas 77002

To: Chris Daniel December 2 1, 2015

County: Harris (C riminal )

Subject: RETURN OF ORIGINAL EXHIBITS

Ple ase acknowledg e the receipt of the original exhibits listed below. Please sign and return

the original to this court.

14

- 15

- 00988

- CR Jose Aldape v The State of Texas 1361921

Sta t e ’ s Exhibit 33, a DVD

Received by: ________________________________________

Received on: ________________________________________
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

January 6, 2016

Hon. Ricardo P. Rodriguez

Hidalgo County District Attorney

100 N. Closner

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mr. David Servin

TDCJ #02010435

Jester IV Unit

4 Jester Road

Richmond, TX 77406

Hon. Alfredo Morales Jr.

Attorney at Law

P. O. Box 52942

McAllen, TX 78505

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-15-00369-CR

Tr.Ct.No. CR-1977-13-D

Style: David Servin v. The State of Texas

Appellant’s brief in the above cause was received and filed in this Court on 

Monday, December 28, 2015.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
Court o¥ .fyf&ifc (Dtfc: V~ H-(<sg^fij^/SovL/£*(/> 7

Q^Md/^k,

0&\

p
•^

"J

(D

-J

HM

in

•p1*1

„2 N

%

ex.

s

*>

^

•^

s

?

^

c

\:

y

M

^

$

5s

y

—:

* i / t i •

\ \ "
127 P.3d 953

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

January 23, 2006

24671

#### Kamalu v. Paren, Inc.

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF INTERACTIVE NETWORK, INC. FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED June 30,
2000, AS PRESENTED IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       5,936,097
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,040,674
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,262,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          896,621
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   142,725,807
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,262,023
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  894,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               106,522
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,849)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,356,470)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (3,081,785)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,357,270)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.111)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.111)


</TABLE>
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply404Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Mark Kinsler (not verified)PermalinkDecember 26, 2022 - 6:38amI just learned about the "session light" from, of all places, Cosmopolitan magazine--an issue from 1897.  Prior to Helen Gurley Brown Cosmo was a literary magazine.  The issue I've got has among other features a poem by Bret Harte, a portion of the original War of the Worlds by H G Wells, and an overwhelmingly dull exposition on higher education from Timothy Dwight, Pres. of Yale.
The advertisements, confined to the back of the magazine, feature ads for a large assortment of hospitals specializing in the cures for cancer, paralysis, alcoholism.  Also included were ads for the expensive fads of the day, namely cameras, bicycles, and music boxes.  One ad encourages the reader to sign up for a correspondence course from the American Correspondence School with the object of passing the Civil Service exam so as to land a Federal job.  It includes a line drawing of the Capitol building with the Session Light pointed out.  I'd never heard of it.  If you'd like a copy of the ad, please let me know.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe