alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Representative Clarence Brown Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Red Buckeye

Year
    1997

Location
      
Capitol Square, S.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text on the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Memorial Tree

*Aesculus pavia*
(Red Buckeye)

Sponsored by
Rep. David L. Hobson

In Honor of Rep. Clarence J. Brown

June 18, 1997
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    The Rep. Clarence Brown tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.

The Rep. Clarence Brown tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
    The Rep. Clarence Brown tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.

The Rep. Clarence Brown tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.
    The Rep. Clarence Brown tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.

The Rep. Clarence Brown tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
    The Rep. Clarence Brown tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

The Rep. Clarence Brown tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

      Previous Image
        Next Image

          The Rep. Clarence Brown tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
      The Rep. Clarence Brown tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.
      The Rep. Clarence Brown tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
      The Rep. Clarence Brown tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Michael T. Mino, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of T-3 Energy Services, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     */*s/ MICHAEL T. MINO     Michael T. Mino  Chief Financial Officer  August 4, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7813

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARTIN DELGADO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief 

District Judge. (2:06-cr-00164-RBS-JEB-1)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martin Delgado, Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Elaine O’Boyle, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Martin Delgado appeals from the district court order 

denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a 

sentence reduction. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. 

A district court may reduce the sentence of a defendant 

whose Guidelines sentencing range has been lowered by the 

Sentencing Commission. United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 

195 (4th Cir. 2013). Whether to grant such a reduction is 

within the district court’s discretion, so long as it considers 

the factors outlined in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2012), to the 

extent applicable. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); Smalls, 720 F.3d 

at 195. The court is not required to grant a reduction, 

however. United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 200 (4th Cir. 

2010). 

We review a district court’s decision whether to grant a 

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. 

Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir. 2010). In so doing, we may 

not substitute our judgment for that of the district court, but 

instead consider whether the court’s exercise of discretion was 

arbitrary or capricious. United States v. Mason, 52 F.3d 1286, 

1289 (4th Cir. 1995).

Our review of the record demonstrates that the court did 

not abuse its discretion in denying Delgado’s motion. The court 

clearly understood its authority to reduce Delgado’s sentence 
3

pursuant to the crack cocaine Guidelines amendment but declined 

to do so based on its careful review of the facts and 

circumstances of Delgado’s case. See United States v. Jeffery, 

631 F.3d 669, 679 (4th Cir. 2011) (“district courts have 

extremely broad discretion when determining the weight to be 

given each of the § 3553(a) factors”).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
April 29, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Changes to the Notice of Proposed Ru lemaking Resulting from OMB Comments

FROM: Marc Thomas Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

The attached document is a copy of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking –Identification of Nonhazardous Secondary Material s That Are Solid Waste , which illustrates the changes EPA

made to the document as a result of the review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Changes made pursuant to OMB comments are identified by comment boxes. Additional changes throughout the document were made based on internal discussion. This redlined/strikeout copy resulted from a compar ison of the final version with the version EPA originally sent to OMB for review.

Attachment
26592

#### State v. Kamana’o

Affirmed
WR-83,074-01

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/7/2015 10:43:54 AM

Accepted 4/7/2015 11:04:54 AM

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ABEL A??ilt

FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

AUSTIN, TEXAS RECEIVED

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

EX PARTE § ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK

§

§ NO. WR-83,074-MOTION DISMISSED

§ DATE: KWh

MICHAEL CHARLES HILL § BY: 0 /

APPLICANT'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND DISMISS

APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT

TO ART. 11.07, TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

NOW COMES the Applicant, MICHAEL CHARLES HILL, and files this Motion

to Withdraw and Dismiss Application for Writ ofHabeas Corpus Pursuant to Art. 11.07, Tex

Code Crim. Proc, and would show the following:

I.

Applicant hereby moves to withdraw and dismiss his Application for Writ ofHabeas

Corpus.

II.

Applicant filed a motion in the trial court prior to his writ application being forwarded

to this Court asking that his Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed. That

motion was granted on March 31,2015. A copy ofthe order ofthe trial court is attached as

Exhibit A.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Applicant prays that this motion be

granted. ELECTRONIC

Applicant's Motion to Withdraw and Dismiss Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to Art. 11.07!
19117

#### Kim v. Administrative Director

Affirmed
Exhibit 99.3

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of DirectorsCanadian National Railway Company

We consent to the use of
our audit report dated January 24, 2006, on the consolidated balance sheets of
the Canadian National Railway Company (the Company) as at December
31, 2005  and 2004 and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, incorporated by reference, through
the 6-K filing  on March 21, 2006, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F.

/s/ KPMG LLPMontreal, CanadaMarch 21, 2006

---
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
George Laird Shoup Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Frederick E. Triebel

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1910

Location
      
National Statuary Hall

This statue of George Laird Shoup was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Idaho in 1910.

George Laird Shoup was born in Kittaning, Pennsylvania, on June 15, 1836. The financial panic of 1857 left the family with virtually nothing. Two years later, Shoup went to the Colorado Territory to engage in mining and merchandising near Pike's Peak. During the Civil War he enlisted with the independent scouts working in New Mexico, Colorado and Texas. He was commissioned colonel when the Third Colorado Cavalry was formed and took part in the battles of Apache Cañon and Sand Creek.

After the war Shoup moved to Virginia City, Montana, and then settled in Salmon, Idaho, a city that he helped found. Shoup was appointed commissioner to organize Lemhi County, and in 1874 he was elected to the territorial legislature. With few interruptions, he served on the Republican National Committee for Idaho from 1880 to 1904. On April 1, 1889, President Harrison appointed him governor of Idaho Territory; he was elected governor after the ratification of Idaho's statehood.

As a U.S. Senator from 1890 to 1901, his many interests included pensions, education, and military affairs. He was chairman of the Committee on Territories and he advocated liberal and just treatment of the Indians. Three years after his defeat in 1901, Shoup died in Boise, Idaho, on December 21, 1904. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF INTERACTIVE NETWORK, INC. FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AS PRESENTED IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,348,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,396,475
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,111,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,162,968
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   144,079,807
<OTHER-SE>                                (146,854,968)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,111,760
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,538,063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,616,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,583,049)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,587,849)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,587,849)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Chelsea Ankeny (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 16, 2021 - 9:24amThank you so much for your hard work and dedication not only after the insurrection but every day. The beauty of our Capitol building is due in thanks to you. Your courage and extraordinary efforts on Jan 6th and the days that have followed deserve our deepest appreciation. The entire crew is amazing!
Thank you from Minnesota! Chelsea
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
"Berry, Leslie" 

<Leslie_Berry@americanche

mistry.com>

03/25/2010 11:19 AM

To EHPV-Program-Submissions@EPA

cc "Franz, Christina" 

<Christina_Franz@americanchemistry.com>

bcc

Subject EHPV 2-methyl-1-butanal Test Plan/Dossiers

HPV Coordinator,

I am attaching the test plan and dossier for 2-methyl-1 butanal for the EHPV program.

Submission Information:

EHPV Program Commitment

Sponsor Name: American Chemistry Council, Oxo Process Panel 

Submission Title: 2-methyl-1-butanal Test Plan/Dossiers

CAS Numbers: 96-17-32

Thank you in advance

Leslie Berry

Chemical Products & Technology Division

American Chemistry Council

1300 Wilson Boulevard 

Arlington, VA 22209

Ph: (703) 741 5612

 - 2-Methylbutanal TestPlan_Feb_2010.doc - 2-Methylbutanal Dossier_Feb_2010.doc
February 18, 1999

21437

#### State v. Rodrigues

Affirmed
Exhibit
32.7
 
 
 SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION
 OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
 AMEREN
ENERGY GENERATING COMPANY
 (required
by Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)
 
 
 In
connection with the report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004 of Ameren Energy Generating Company (the “Company”) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-K"), I, R. Alan Kelley, chief executive officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:
March 9, 2005
  ****/s/ R. Alan
  KelleyR. Alan KelleyPresident(Principal Executive
      Officer)
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### Kaanapali Hillside Homeowners’ Ass’n ex rel. Bd. of Directors v. Doran

25585

03/08/2007

Granted

112 Hawai'i 356, 145 P.3d 899
EXHIBIT 11
                             LASERSIGHT INCORPORATED
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                   THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND 1999


                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                           March 31,
                                           -----------------------------------
                                                2000                  1999
                                           -----------------------------------
BASIC AND DILUTED
      Weighted average shares outstanding     19,234,000            13,418,000
                                           =============          ============

      Net loss                             $  (2,758,952)           (3,320,364)
                                           =============          ============

      Basic loss per share                 $       (0.14)                (0.25)
                                           =============          ============

ADDITIONAL DILUTED CALCULATION

      Net loss, above                      $  (2,758,952)           (3,320,364)
                                           =============         =============

      Additional adjustment to weighted
       average number of shares:

      Weighted average shares
       outstanding, above                     19,234,000            13,418,000
      Dilutive effect of contingently
       issuable shares, stock options
       and convertible preferred stock         5,084,000             4,479,000
                                           -------------          ------------

      Weighted average number of              24,318,000            17,897,000
       shares, adjusted                    =============          ============

      Diluted loss per share, adjusted     $       (0.11)  (A)           (0.19)
                                           =============          ============


      (A)  This  calculation  is  submitted  in accordance  with Regulation
           S-K item 601(b)(11)  although  it is contrary to  paragraph 13-14  of
           SFAS 128 because it produces an anti-dilutive result.