alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Livestock, Poultry, and 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Grain Market News Room 2619-S, STOP 0252

Division Washington, DC 20250-0252

USDA Expands Market Reporting to Include Specialty Pork Products

On August 5, 2019, USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) will begin publishing the 

new National Weekly Specialty Pork Report (FOB Plant and FOB Omaha) through its Livestock 

Mandatory Reporting Program (LMR). The report will provide customers with more data and 

market information not previously available and increase market transparency. 

The report reflects the increased availability of specialty pork products due to changing 

consumer preferences and production practices. The report includes market information for pork 

cuts from programs including but not limited to open pen gestation, crate free, antibiotic free, noantibiotics ever, pre-priced and labeled, color graded, breed specific, quality graded, and organic. 

Pork cuts will be reported as a combination of all destinations, sales types, delivery periods, 

refrigeration types, packaging styles (unless specified), and added ingredients. There will be cuts 

from the loin, butt, picnic, sparerib, ham, and belly primals plus trimmings. 

To access AMS pork reports, visit: www.ams.usda.gov/market-news/livestock-poultry-grain. 

For more information on LMR, visit: www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/mmr. For additional 

information, contact Michael Lynch, Livestock, Poultry, and Grain Market News Director, at 

(202) 720-4846; or Taylor Cox, Field Chief, at (515) 284-4460.
#### State v. Cho

16973

9/30/96

Affirmed
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Anthony Bombacie, Raymond Donoghue and Richard Peet, Defendants.

City Magistrate’s Court, Borough of Manhattan,

December 20, 1957.

*Frank J.*Hogan, *District Attorney,*for plaintiff.

*E. K. Gerling*for defendants.

Walter J. Bayer, M.

The defendants are accused of the crime of malicious mischief in that on November 23, 1957 they allegedly willfully broke and destroyed the property of Alfred Meyers operator of the Hotel Christopher at 180 Christopher Street, Manhattan, near the waterfront.

The evidence on the hearing held before me on December 12, 1957, discloses that the three youths, all living in the vicinity, dressed in lumber jackets and then in an inebriated state, carrying paper bags of beer in cans but no baggage, were checked into room 203 at about 4:20 in the morning.

As a result of an alleged complaint, complaining witness entered the rented room and testified that he found the defendants in the act of throwing beer cans, spattering them over the painted surfaces, tearing curtains and bed sheets, breaking a mirror and jumping on bed springs. He claimed he came a second time to quell the noises and warn the boys and allegedly also saw defendant donoghue pull at the sink cracking the lead waste elbow line.

The defendants offered to pay the sum alleged to be the value of the property damaged by them and the People’s complaining witness offered to accept compensation in compromise and stated the amount of his damage to total to $245.

With the elements present it became incumbent upon the court to take testimony in aid to a decision whether to permit compromise and of necessity to find:

*first-,*whether a prima facie case existed;

*second-,*that the amount of damage alleged was the actual damage suffered — no part of which was compensatory damages or a penalty or in consideration of the withdrawal of the complaint.

*10The court thereafter took testimony respecting the alleged crime and the actual damages allegedly suffered.

By reason of the provisions of sections 663 and 664 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the court considered all proceedings stayed pending its determination of the foregoing application.

The motion of the parties to compromise is granted and the District Attorney’s motion to dismiss is of necessity denied.

The damages on the credible evidence, are computed at the sum of $153 and upon payment thereof in accordance with law this complaint is dismissed.

Bail posted by each of the defendants is exonerated and discharged.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 17 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit the consideration of a concurrent resolution to provide for a recess of the House 

after July 31 of any year unless the House has approved each regular 

appropriation bill for the next fiscal year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. WITTMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

prohibit the consideration of a concurrent resolution to 

provide for a recess of the House after July 31 of any 

year unless the House has approved each regular appropriation bill for the next fiscal year. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Stay on Sched4 ule (S.O.S.) Resolution’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 17 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING RECESS DURING AUGUST UNTIL AP2 PROVAL OF ALL REGULAR APPROPRIATION 

3 BILLS. 

4 Rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representa5 tives is amended by adding at the end the following new 

6 clause: 

7 ‘‘Concurrent resolution providing for adjournment 

8 during August 

9 ‘‘12. If by July 31 of any calendar year the House 

10 has not passed each of the regular appropriation bills for 

11 the fiscal year which begins on October 1 of that calendar 

12 year, it shall not be in order to consider a concurrent reso13 lution to provide that the House stand adjourned during 

14 any day occurring during August of that calendar year 

15 until the House has passed each such bill. For purposes 

16 of this clause, the term ‘regular appropriation bill’ means 

17 any annual appropriation bill which is under the jurisdic18 tion of a single subcommittee of the Committee on Appro19 priations of the House of Representatives (as may be pro20 vided under the Rules for the fiscal year involved).’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
922 P.2d 975

September 16, 1996

16418

#### State v. Dorton

Vacated
EX-10.20



 Exhibit 10.20 

CONSENT AND AMENDMENT 

May 15, 2018 

Reference is hereby made to (i) the Agreement of Limited Partnership of VX3 (DE) LP, dated as of October 27, 2017, by and among VX 3
Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Ontario as the general partner (the “General Partner”), the parties set out in Schedule A thereto (the “Limited Partners”), and any other Persons who shall in the
future execute and deliver the Partnership Agreement as additional Partners pursuant to the provisions thereof (the “Partnership Agreement”), and (ii) the Services Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2017, by and between
Vaccinex, Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware (“Vaccinex”), and VX3 (DE) LP, a limited partnership organized under the laws of Delaware (the “Partnership”) (the “Services
Agreement”), each as amended by the Consent and Amendment, dated as of February 28, 2018, by and among the General Partner, FCMI Parent Co., a Limited Partner (“FCMI”), and the Partnership (the “First
Amendment”). 
 Following the First Amendment, the General Partner and FCMI agreed that, on or about the date hereof, FCMI would
make a Capital Contribution to the Partnership in the amount of US$2,000,000 in exchange for Limited Partner Units at the Limited Partner Purchase Price (the “May 2018 Capital Contribution”). 

For purposes of Section 5.2(b) of the Partnership Agreement, the General Partner and FCMI hereby authorize and approve the May 2018
Capital Contribution. Additionally, each of the undersigned parties hereby agree and acknowledge that Schedule A to the Partnership Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety in the form attached hereto as Annex A to reflect the
May 2018 Capital Contribution (the “Amended Schedule”). Finally, each of the undersigned parties hereby acknowledge and agree that Schedule C to the Services Agreement shall be amended to provide that US$2,000,000 be applied to the
costs and expenses of Vaccinex in connection with the performance of the Services (as defined in the Services Agreement) from and after the date hereof. 

All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Partnership Agreement. 

[signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Consent and Amendment, or have caused
this Consent and Amendment to be duly executed on their behalf, as of the day and year first hereinabove set forth. 
  

			
	GENERAL PARTNER:
	
	VX3 INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Richard Sutin

	Name:	 	Richard Sutin
	Title:	 	President
	
	LIMITED PARTNER:
	
	FCMI PARENT CO.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Dan Scheiner

	Name:	 	Dan Scheiner
	Title:	 	Vice President
	
	VACCINEX, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Maurice Zauderer

	Name:	 	Maurice Zauderer, Ph.D.
	Title:	 	CEO
	
	VX3 (DE) LP
	
	By: VX 3 Inc., its General Partner
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Richard Sutin

	Name:	 	Richard Sutin
	Title:	 	President


 [Signature Page to Consent and Amendment]
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply531Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Adam Wolfe (not verified)PermalinkAugust 14, 2022 - 1:39pmI want to express my gratitude to this writer who writes very well and covers all the information on the topic
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply607Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  paul Ventresca... (not verified)PermalinkJuly 12, 2018 - 6:31amPaul from Boston, _x000D_ _x000D_ Great to hear, I have visited many times, it's good to see the group of folks who keep it maintained "great work!"_x000D_ _x000D_ It's also good to see safety being focused on for all of you....
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 2, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41718

Summary Calendar

 

ROYAL MAYNE HOPPER, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:02-CV-542

--------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Royal Mayne Hopper, Jr., incarcerated federal prisoner

# 27844-048, appeals the district court’s affirmance of the

Social Security Commissioner’s nonpayment of his social security

retirement benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 402(x)(1). Hopper

argues that the nonpayment of his benefits violates 42 U.S.C.

§ 407(a). We disagree. The Commissioner’s nonpayment of

benefits to Hopper pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 402(x) does not fall
No. 02-41718

-2-

within 42 U.S.C. § 407(a)’s anti-attachment provisions. See

Washington State Dept. of Social and Health Services v.

Guardianship Estate of Keffeler, 123 S. Ct. 1017, 1024-26 (2003).

Hopper asserts that the benefits are his property and that

the nonpayment of those benefits is a seizure and should fall

under the criminal forfeiture statutes. He fails to include his

reasons for this conclusion or citations to relevant authority. 

See FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9)(A). Accordingly, Hopper has

abandoned this issue on appeal by failing to brief it

adequately. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.

1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d

744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 In connection with the Quarterly Report of T-3 Energy Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gus D.
Halas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/GUS D. HALASGus D. Halas
    Chief Executive Officer
    July 30, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to T-3 Energy Services, Inc. and will be retained by T-3 Energy
Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
/s/ Barbara T. AlexanderBarbara T. AlexanderDirector
Centex Corporation




---



##### 



/s/ Matthew K. RoseMatthew K. RoseDirector
Centex Corporation




---



##### 



/s/ Juan L. ElekJuan L. ElekDirector
Centex Corporation




---



##### 



/s/ Clint W. Murchison, IIIClint W. Murchison, IIIDirector
Centex Corporation




---



##### 



/s/ Frederick M. PosesFrederick M. PosesDirector
Centex Corporation




---



##### 



/s/ Ursula O. FairbairnUrsula O. FairbairnDirector
Centex Corporation




---



##### 



/s/ David W. QuinnDavid W. QuinnDirector
Centex Corporation




---



##### 



/s/ Thomas M. SchoeweThomas M. SchoeweDirector
Centex Corporation




---



##### 



/s/ Timothy R. EllerTimothy R. EllerDirector
Centex Corporation




---



##### 



/s/ James J. PostlJames J. PostlDirector
Centex Corporation




---



##### 



/s/ Thomas J. FalkThomas J. FalkDirector
Centex Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,486
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     38,379
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        145,046
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,545
<DEPOSITS>                                     186,026
<SHORT-TERM>                                       600
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,419
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,342
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,695
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 204,545
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,087
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,829
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   307
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,223
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,558
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,675
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,548
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      260
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (47)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,891
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,903
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,903
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        523
<LOANS-PAST>                                       406
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    65
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,426
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,541
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      120
<RECOVERIES>                                        19
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,700
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,700
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS, INC. FORM 10-Q DATED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,684,392
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               41,000,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 44,399,368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           104,562,673
<PP&E>                                      82,134,540
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,266,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             208,976,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       59,267,858
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       151,110
<OTHER-SE>                                  71,672,467
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               208,976,456
<SALES>                                    141,233,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           141,233,454
<CGS>                                      112,743,084
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              112,743,084
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,449,994
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,936,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,476,015
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,241,563
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,234,452
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,234,452
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22


</TABLE>
#### Zane v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

27317

03/01/2007

Granted

— Hawai'i -, - P.3d -
January 31, 2002

23592

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed