alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    This Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in this Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: December 17, 2009
    /s/ Mark A. LibratoreMark A. LibratorePresident and Chief Executive Officer
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In the Interest of Z.W. and B.D., Children

No. 06-13-00097-CV

Appeal from the 196th District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 78,887). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated her inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 17, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.01
 Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Form 10Q, Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed on October 30, 2008
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Richard J. Giromini

Richard J. GirominiPresident and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 30, 2008/s/ Robert J. Smith

Robert J. SmithSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerOctober 30, 2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003* In connection with the Annual Report of IEA Income Fund X (the Registrant) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Dennis J.
Tietz, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., the
General Partner of the Registrant, and John Kallas, the Chief Financial Officer
of Cronos Capital Corp., certify, based on their knowledge, that:  (i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Registrant.March 26, 2004 By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz,President and Chief Executive OfficerCronos Capital Corp.,General Partner of the Registrant/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas, Chief Financial OfficerCronos Capital Corp.,General Partner of the Registrant
 A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.    *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2003, other than as required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-15-00434-CR 

Shonda Lee Moxley 

v. 

The State of Texas 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From the 432nd District Court 

of Tarrant County (1417154D) 

March 3, 2016 

Per Curiam 

(nfp) 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 1, 2013

p0325 

# Order

April 1, 2013

146396

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146396

COA: 307248

Hillsdale CC: 11

- 352537

- FH;

11

- 352538

- FH;

11

- 352539

- FH

AINSLEY ANDERSON PARTRIDGE, III,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
September 17, 2004

25663

#### State v. Oliveira

Affirmed
,_ 

April 14, 2015 

GUSTAVO L. MIRELES 

TDCJ-ID # 1128895 

3001 S. EMILY DR. 

McCONNELL UNIT 

BEEVILLE,. TEXAS 78102 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

ATTN: CLERK-ABEL ACOSTA 

P.O.BOX 12308 , Capitol Stattion 

Austin, Texas-78711 

RECEHIED~N COURT OJ: CRIMINAl APPEALS 

APR 20 2D15 

4b®~ Acosta, Clerk 

RE: Application for writ of mandamus CCA No. WR~76, 258-03 

Trial Court Case No. CR-3196-01-(F). 

Dear Honorable Clerk: 

I filed an application for writ of mandamus, as mentioned 

above. The Clerk's Office s~nt. me written notice that it had 

recived the application and had presented to the court, on 

March 19, 2015. 

With the application for writ of mandamus I had included a 

'Moti6n for Leave", to file the application. You see here at the 

Unit that I am in, the "Law Library" does not have updated 

reading material for researching and preparing litigations. I 

am left with what ever is available to me. 

I found out after I had filed my application that the 

"Motion for Leave" was not necessary since the court of 

criminal appeals did away with that requirment sev~ral years 

ago. 

I recieved written notice today that the "Motion for 

Leave'', to fi~e the application for writ of mandamus was 

denied without a written order. So, the 'motion for leave", 

has been despo~ed. 

However, I would like to ask this Honorable Clerk's. office, 

'What is the disposition of the application for writ of mandamus" 

it's self?. Is that application still pending decision by the 

court? Or, because the "motion for Leave" was denied, does this 

include the application for writ of mandamus aswell? 

Please be so kind to notify me of the application's status, 

if it is still pending decision by the court;- or notify me 

if it .has been denied along with the "motion for leave"? 

I need to know, so that I can pursue my Federal right's 

litigations. thank you so much for your attention to thi~ 

very important and urgent matter. 

Sincerly, 

;s; Mwdtwo J_ /1[1\ok 

GUSTAVO LOPEZ MIRELES 

ENCLOSURES: 

CC: FILE; LEONOR MATANO, 580 Irene dr. canyon-Lake, texas 78133, 

Innocence Project of Texas, Lubbock, TX.
#### P. R. & S., INC., Appellant, v. Mike PELLACK, Ivan M. Pellack, and Floyd Pellack, Appellees.

No. 3596.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Aug. 11, 1978.

Douglas Pope, Anchorage, for appellant.

*196James S. Crane and James M. Morgan, Johnson, Christenson & Glass, Anchorage, for appellees.

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NO WITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The question in this case concerns the admissibility of testimony relating to out of court statements made by an employee of appellant as to the terms of appellees’ contract of employment. A statement by an agent or employee on a matter within the scope of his agency or employment, made during the existence of the relationship, is an admission of a party opponent, and, as such, an exception to the rule excluding hearsay testimony.1 Here there was evidence that the employee was a superintendent with the power to hire and that his statements were made while he was so employed by appellant. Testimony concerning his statements was therefore properly admitted.

AFFIRMED.

1

. Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(D) provides:

> (d) Statements which are not hearsay. A statement is not hearsay if .

> (2) Admission by party-opponent. The statement is offered against a party and is

> (D) a statement by his agent or servant concerning a matter within the scope of his agency or employment, made during the existence of the relationship; .

> *Gagliardi v. Flint,*564 F.2d 112, 116 (3rd Cir. 1977); *Wright Fruit Co., Inc. v. Morrison,*309 So.2d 54, 55 (Fla.App.1975), *cert. denied,*316 So.2d 291 (Fla.1975); *Bobo v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.,*308 So.2d 907, 910 (La.App.1975); *cf. Gilmour v. Strescon Industries, Inc.,*66 F.R.D. 146,. 149-150 (1975).

> The proposed Alaska Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(D) is identical to the federal rule.
#### May C. TAYLOR and Pearle Larene Taylor a/k/a Pearle Larene Reeb, a/k/a Pearle Larene Beaudoin, Appellants (Defendants below), v. Lavoy O. TAYLOR, Plaintiff below, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF KEMMERER, as Guardian of the Estate of May C. Taylor and Vellamo Carera, Trust Officer of the First National Bank of Kemmerer, in her purported capacity as guardian of the person, Appellees (Defendants below), v. William Richard TAYLOR et al., Third-Party Defendants below.

Nos. 4513, 4514.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Jan. 21, 1976.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 24, 1976.

Pearle Larene Beaudoin filed a brief and appeared in oral argument pro se.

May C. Taylor filed a brief pro se but did not appear in oral argument.

Ted C. Frome, Afton, signed the brief and appeared in oral argument on behalf of appellees, First National Bank of Kem-merer and Vellamo Carera, its trust officer.

There were no briefs filed or appearances made by any other parties.

Before GUTHRIE, C. J., and Mc-CLINTOCK, RAPER, THOMAS and ROSE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The issues raised by appellants in their appeals were settled by this court in *Beau-doin v. Taylor,*Wyo. 1972, 492 P.2d 966.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|Date:             |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|February 23, 2007 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | John P. Manning            
|                  |  | Principal Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 361 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning the need 

to explore emerging technologies that are mobile and capable of supplying 

high volumes of sterile, pathogenic-free water, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2015 

Mr. WILLIAMS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning the need to explore emerging technologies that 

are mobile and capable of supplying high volumes of 

sterile, pathogenic-free water, and for other purposes. 

Whereas small communities are severely burdened when the 

Environmental Protection Agency closes their wastewater 

treatment plants; 

Whereas flood waters can disable wastewater and drinking 

water facilities; 

Whereas natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, 

and earthquakes, can leave entire cities without power 

and, therefore, without potable water; and 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 361 IH 

Whereas due to the growing population of the United States, 

there are more pathogens entering the Nation’s water 

systems: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that in order to respond to situations in which 

3 water systems are closed as a result of Environmental 

4 Protection Agency induced shutdowns, disease outbreaks, 

5 epidemics, pandemics, or natural disasters, the Environ6 mental Protection Agency and the Department of Home7 land Security should explore emerging technologies that 

8 are mobile and capable of supplying affected communities 

9 and hospitals with high volumes of sterile, pathogenic-free 

10 water. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

 

**NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHURANDERSEN LLP**

 

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), provides that if any part of a registration statement at the time such part becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact or an omission to state a material fact required to bestated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth oromission) may sue, among others, every accountant who has consented to be named as having prepared or certified any part of the registration statement, or as having prepared or certified any report or valuation which is used in connection with theregistration statement, with respect to the statement in such registration statement, report or valuation which purports to have been prepared or certified by the accountant. 

 

On May 20, 2002, Ceradyne, Inc. dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP as its independent auditor and appointedPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to replace Arthur Andersen. Ceradyne has been unable to obtain Arthur Andersen’s written consent to the incorporation by reference into this Registration Statements of its audit report with respect to Ceradyne’sfinancial statements as of December 31, 2000 and 2001 and for the years then ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits Ceradyne to file this Form S-3 without a written consent from Arthur Andersen. As a result,Arthur Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to bestated therein. Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any purchases of securities under this Registration Statement. To the extent provided in Section 11(b)(3)(C) ofthe Securities Act, however, other persons who are liable under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act, including Ceradyne’s officers and directors, may still rely on Arthur Andersen’s original audit reports as being made by an expert forpurposes of establishing a due diligence defense under Section 11(b) of the Securities Act.
1 **ADMINISTRATIVE DOCKET Vermont**  : Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Program Revisions; Proposed Rule and Direct Final Rule **Federal Register** Notice

April 20 , 2 0 1 5 Table of Contents The following documents comprise the administrative docket that provides a basis for EPA’s proposed and direct final rule decision to authorize Vermont for revisions to its hazardous waste program regulating wastewater evaporators that it adopted on March 1 5 , 20 13 . Only primary documents are located on FDMS. All other documents are available from EPA Region 1 upon request. **Accordion Folder**  Table of Contents  Executive Summary

– Propos al f or RCRA Subtitle C Authorization of Vermont’s Hazardous Waste M anagement Program Revisions  Executed copy

of the Proposed Rule and the Direct Final Rule, and a cop y of the **Federal R** **egister** notice s  Letter requesting final authorization of state hazardous waste regulations dated January 16, 2015, from Charles Schwer, Director, Waste Management & Prevention Division, Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, also includes the Attorney General statement dated January

13, 2015.  Copy of Legal Notice published in Vermont’s major newspapers, The Rutland Herald and The Burlington Free Press  Copy of notice letter sent by

EPA to interested parties from Vermont’s mailing list (copy attached)  Vermont’s Hazardous Waste Management Regulations Subchapter 1 through 9, effective March 15, 2013. Lo cated on - line at the VTDEC website .  Memo

–Further Explanation of Decision dated February 2015 o The following documents referenced in the February 2015 memo: OECA Email/Memo date d October 9, 20142 EPA Equivalency

Policy , September 7, 2005 More Stringent

– Broader in Scope Policy , December 23, 2014 More Stringent

– Broader in Scope Policy Appendix Cervino Letter , dated January 16, 1992 Fisher Letter , dated June 2, 1993 Elliott L etter , dated March 20, 1989 12/15/1987 OSW Director Memo Olsen Letter , dated August 3, 1987 Sasson L etter , dated May 1, 1987 10/17/1994 OSW Director Memo Note attached to Sasson Letter 51 F ed. Reg. 10146, 10168 56 F ed. Reg. 7134, 7202 55 Fed . Reg . 29230, 29232
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 314 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 314

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
eligibility of veterans service organizations for community development 
                          block grant funding.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2015

    Mr. Frelinghuysen submitted the following resolution; which was 
referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
eligibility of veterans service organizations for community development 
                          block grant funding.

Whereas the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the American Legion, and other veterans 
        service organizations, through local posts, provide a host of invaluable 
        services to veterans across the United States, including benefits 
        assistance, career services, financial assistance, homeless outreach, 
        and supporting services;
Whereas veteran service organizations also provide several important services 
        for local communities, including various educational programs, and 
        providing shelter during public emergencies; and
Whereas notwithstanding the critical services provided by veteran service 
        organizations to veterans and the public, some posts may be deemed 
        ineligible for Federal community development block grant funding for 
        public facilities and improvements; Now, therefore, be it--
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) veterans service organizations provide invaluable 
        services to the veterans and local communities across the 
        United States; and
            (2) Congress should seek changes to Federal law to ensure 
        that all veteran service organizations are eligible for 
        community development block grant funding for public facilities 
        and improvements funding.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Standard
Management Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003, we Ronald D. Hunter
and Paul B. ("Pete") Pheffer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Standard Management Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of our knowledge and belief, that:

                  (1)   such Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                        1934; and

                  (2)   the information contained in such Report fairly
                        presents, in all material respects, the financial
                        condition and results of operations of Standard
                        Management Corporation.

May 21, 2004

/s/ Ronald D. Hunter
----------------------------
Ronald D. Hunter
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Paul B. ("Pete") Pheffer
----------------------------
Paul B. ("Pete") Pheffer
President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Doe Children, In re

25929

01/24/2005

Affirmed