~ RIVfq 

Lam ~ 

0 

9 

4414cmMa~~~ 

Serving Sutter and Yuba Counties 

938 14t" Street, Ste 275 

Marysville, CA 95941 

(530) 634-7659 

FAX (530) 634-7660 

www.fraqmd.org 

David A. Valler, Jr. 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

FINAL 

REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) 

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) REVISION 

FOR FRAQMD NONATTAINMENT AREAS 

SUTTER BUTTES AND 

SOUTH SUTTER COUNTY PORTION OF THE SACRAMENTO 

FEDERAL 8-HOUR OZONE (SFNA) 

NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR CONTROL 

TECHNIQUES GUIDELINES ISSUED 2006-2008 

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Obligations under the Federal Clean Air Act 

Adopted June 1, 2009 

Air Pollution Control Officer: David A. Valler, Jr. 

Prepared by: Sondra Andersson, Air Quality Planner II 

Feather River Air Quality Management District 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Page # 

Executive Surnmary 2 

Discussion 

Nonattainment Areas in the District 2 

2006 SIP Revision 3 

RACT/CTG 3 

Findings/Staff Recommendation 4 

CTG Applicability Overview 4 

Table 1: List of CTGs issued 2006-2008 

Permitted Sources in the SFNA 4 

Table 2: List of permitted sources in SFNA 

Individual CTG Applicability Analysis 5 

Negative Declaration/Statement of Adoption 8 

Attachments 

Attachment A: Permitted Facilities Located in South Sutter County (As of March 10, 2009) 

Attachment B: Feather River Air Quality Management District Board of Directors 

Negative Declaration Adoption Resolution 2009-06 

Attachment C: Evidence of Public Notice for Public Hearing and 

Adoption of Negative Declaration. 

1 
EXECUTIVE SUAINL&RY 

The federal Clean Air Act (CAA) requires certain sources (specified in Section 183(e)) in ozone 

nonattainment areas to implement control methods called reasonably available control technology (RACT). 

In order to assist areas in identifying and implementing RACT, the United States Environmental Protection 

Agency (US EPA) issues Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for specific source categories. These serve 

to define RACT, and each nonattainment area must implement measures laid out in a CTG, or the 

equivalent, if there are sources in the area to which that CTG applies. If there are no sources within the 

nonattainment area applicable to a CTG, then a Negative Declaration must be prepared, which provides 

background information and supporting evidence for the District's determination. 

The Feather River Air Quality Management District (District) previously prepared a RACT Analysis for 

CTGs issued prior to 2006. The RACT Analysis was adopted by the District Board of Directors at the 

December 2006 Meeting and submitted to the US EPA. 

During the years 2006 through 2008, the US EPA issued 11 additional CTGs. The District evaluated each 

CTG for applicability in the nonattainrnent area. The District has determined that there are no sources in the 

SFNA portion of the District subject to a RACT requirement. Therefore the requirement to adopt a rule for 

those sources is not applicable. 

The District has prepared this Negative Declaration for RACT certification, which also includes a 

commitment to adopt and implement RACT in the event that a source to which a CTG applies is identified 

in the nonattainment area in the future. The Negative Declaration must be approved by the District Board of 

Directors, and is subject to public notice and a public hearing. Once approved, the Negative Declaration for 

RACT SIP will be submitted to the US EPA as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). 

This Board action declares that the Feather River Air Quality Management District does not have any 

sources, and does not anticipate any sources, subject to a CTG, in the nonattainment area. 

DISCUSSION 

Nonattainment Areas within the District 

Two parts of the District are designated nonattainment for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS) for 8-hour ozone: south Sutter County and atop (>2,000 ft) the Sutter Buttes. 

The nonattainment area atop the Sutter Buttes does not contain any residential, commercial, or industrial 

facilities, and does not generate any stationary, area, or mobile sources of pollution. The sensor located at 

the top of the South Butte is used to monitor ozone transport emissions entering the Northern Sacramento 

Valley Air Basin from the metropolitan area of Sacramento. 

The southern portion of Sutter County (as defined in 40 CFR Section 81.305) is part of the Sacramento 

Federal Nonattainment Area (SFNA) for 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The portion is bounded on the north by the 

Yolo-Colusa County border east to the Yuba-Sutter Border, on the east by Placer County, on the south by 

Sacramento County, and on the west by Yolo County. 

As part of the SFNA for 8-hour ozone NAAQS, south Sutter County was initially classified as a"serious" 

nonattainment area with an attainment deadline of June 15, 2013. On February 14, 2008, the California Air 

2 
Resources Board requested a voluntary reclassification to "severe" with an extended attainment deadline of 

June 15, 2019. Because June 15 this at the beginning of the 2019 ozone season, the region must have met 

the standards by the end of the 2018 ozone season. 

2006 RACT SIP Submittal 

The District prepared a RACT Analysis for inclusion in the SIP for CTGs issued prior to 2006 in accordance 

with 40 CFR 51.912. The RACT Analysis was adopted by the District's Board of Directors at the December 4, 

2006 Meeting. 

The adopted SIP revisions included negative declarations for major sources in both nonattainment areas, a 

negative declaration for all pre-2006 CTG source categories for atop of Sutter Buttes, and CTG source 

category analysis for CTG source categories in south Sutter County. 

The District identified one source category during the 2006 RACT Analysis that was applicable to a CTG. 

The District received comments from US EPA that District Rule 3.8 Storage and Transfer of Gasoline was 

less stringent than US EPA's CTG. In response, the District has modified Rule 3.8 to be as stringent as the 

corresponding CTG. This rule revision is scheduled for District Board adoption on June 1, 2009. Once 

approved by the District Board of Directors, the revised rule will be submitted to US EPA for inclusion in 

the SIP. 

Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT)/Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) 

Sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f) of the federal CAA requires the District to submit a revision to the SIP to 

implement RACT for each category of volatile organic compound (VOC) sources covered by a CTG 

document and for any majorlstationary source not covered by a CTG document. 

Alternatively, the District may adopt a negative declaration documenting that the District has no stationary 

sources or emitting facilities located within the nonattainment areas subject to the US EPA CTG documents. 

The CAA requires that Districts submit negative declarations for those source categories for which they are 

not adopting CTG-based regulations (because they have no sources above the CTG recommended 

threshold) regardless of whether such negative declarations were made for an earlier SIP. This is necessary 

since there may now be sources in the nonattainment area that previously did not exist, or in areas where the 

boundaries of the nonattainment area have expanded, there may be sources in the new portion of the 

nonattainment area which should not be overlooked. The negative declaration must go through the same 

public review requirements as any other SIP submittal. 

EPA defines RACT as the lowest emission limitation that a particular source is capable of ineeting by the 

application of control technology (i.e., devices, systems, process modification, or other apparatus or 

techniques that reduce air pollution) that is reasonably available considering technological and economic 

feasibility. The RACT requirement is meant to ensure that all moderate and above nonattainment areas, 

have in place RACT for source categories covered by a CTG document and for major sources that are not 

subj ect to a CTG. 

' The definition of a major source is dependent on the severity of the air quality problem in a region. For Feather River AQMD, a 

severe non attainment area, the major source threshold is the potential to emit 25 tons per year of VOC or NOx. 

3 
FINDINGS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION 

CTG Applicability Determination Overview 

The District has reviewed its permit files and the emission inventory for its federal Clean Air Plan, and has 

determined that there are no stationary sources or emitting facilities for the following CTG categories 

located in the District's nonattainment areas. The District also does not anticipate these sources in the 

future. 

Table 1: Listing of CTGs issued 2006-2008 

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT TITLE DOCUMENT 

TYPE 

DOCUMENT NUMBER 

Industrial Cleaning Solvents CTG EPA-453/R-06-001 2006/09 

Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing CTG EPA-453/R-06-002 2006/09 

Flexible Package Printing CTG EPA-453/R-06-003 2006/09 

Flat Wood Paneling Coatings CTG EPA-453/R-06-004 2006/09 

Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings CTG EPA 453/R-07-003 2007/09 

Large Appliance Coatings CTG EPA 453/R-07-004 2007/09 

Metal Furniture Coatings CTG EPA 453/R-07-005 2007/09 

Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Plastic Parts Coatings CTG EPA 453/R-08-003 2008/09 

Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials CTG EPA 453/R-08-004 2008/09 

Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives CTG EPA 453/R-08-005 2008/09 

Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings CTG EPA 453/R-08-006 2008/09 

The District has determined that there are no major sources located in either the south Sutter County 

nonattainment area (as part of the SFNA) or atop the Sutter Buttes. 

Permitted Sources in the SFNA 

Table 2: Source Types Permitted in South Sutter County (SFNA ortion) 

Source Type Number of Maz PTE of Maz PTE of 

Sources THC to r THC lbs/da 

Rice Dryer 11 0.41 2.25 

Concrete Batch 1 0.02 0.11 Plant 

Private Gas 3 0.99 5.42 Dis ensin 

Internal 

Combustion 12 0.25 1.37 

En ' e 

Animal 1 0.02 0.11 Crematory 

Misc Processes 1 8.75 47.95 

Automotive 1 1.4 7.67 Re air 

0 
Individual CTG Applicability Analysis 

INDUSTRIAL CLEANING SOLVENTS (EPA-453/R-06-001 2006/09) 

This CTG applies to industries that use organic solvent for cleaning unit operations such as mixing vessels 

(tanks), spray booths, and parts cleaners. The applicability threshold is 6.8 kg/day (15 lb/day) of VOC, which is 

consistent with the thresholds level contained in previous CTGs. This threshold is estimated to be reached at 

use of 4 gallons per day (1,458 gallons per year) of solvent with a density of 900 g/1(a presumptive density 

consistent with assumptions in the 1994 ACT for industrial solvents) having 50% VOC content, all of which is 

emitted. 

The District evaluated permitted facilities in the south Sutter County portion of the SFNA for organic solvent 

use that may exceed 15 lb/day of VOC. The District has determined that two facilities use solvents for cleaners 

in their spray booths. One facility is a small automotive repair facility that is permitted up to 10 gallons of 

solvent per year, which does not exceed the CTG threshold. The other facility has various equipment permitted 

under the District, including solvent use for a spray booth. The permitted limits for this facility are 250 gallons 

per year with a VOC limit of 7.41bs/gallon, which equates to a potential to emit 5.l O lbs/day of VOC from 

solvent use. This potential is below the threshold for the CTG. 

Therefore, the District does not have any sources in the SFNA or atop the Sutter Buttes that apply to this CTG. 

OFFSET LITHOGRAPHIC PRINTING AND LETTERPRESS PRINTING (EPA-453/R-06-002 2006/09) 

This CTG provides control recommendations for reducing VOC emissions stemming from the use of fountain 

solutions, cleaning materials, and inks in offset lithographic printing and cleaning solutions, cleaning materials 

and inks in offset lithographic printing, and cleaning materials and inks in letterpress printing. The CTG applies 

to operations where emissions of VOC associated with all aspects of that operation equal or exceed 6.8 kg/day 

(151b/day) actual emissions of VOC, prior to any controls. 

The District does not have any sources in the SFNA or atop the Sutter Buttes that apply to this CTG. 

FLEXIBLE PACKAGE PRINTING (EPA-453/R-06-003 2006/09) 

This CTG provides control recommendations for flexible packaging printing cleaning materials to flexible 

package printing operations that emit at least 6.8 kg/day (15 lb/day) actual emissions of VOC before controls. 

Flexible packaging includes, but is not limited to, bags, pouches, liners and wraps utilizing paper, plastic, film, 

aluminum foil, metalized or coated paper or film, or any combination of these materials. 

The District does not have any sources in the SFNA or atop the Sutter Buttes that apply to this CTG. 

FLAT WOOD PANELING COATINGS (EPA-453/R-06-004 2006/09) 

This CTG applies to facilities that apply flat wood paneling coatings that emit at least 6.8 kg/day (15 lb/day) of 

VOC before consideration of controls. Flat wood paneling coating means wood paneling products that are any 

interior, exterior or tileboard (class I hardboard) panel to which a protective, decorative, or functional material 

or layer has been applied. 

The District does not have any sources in the SFNA or atop the Sutter Buttes that apply to this CTG. 

5 
PAPER, FILM, AND FOIL COATINGS (EPA 453/R-07-003 2007/09) 

This CTG provides control recommendations for reducing VOC emissions from the use of paper, film, and foil 

surface coating operations, where to total actual emissions from these processes, including cleaning activities, 

equal or exceed 6.8 kg/day (15 lb/day). For facilities where actual emissions from these surface coating 

operations are greater than 15 lb/day before consideration of controls, and where no individual coating lines 

have the potential to emit 25 tpy or more of VOC before controls, the CTG recommends applying only 

recommended work practices for cleanup. 

The District does not have any sources in the SFNA or atop the Sutter Buttes that apply to this CTG. 

LARGE APPLIANCE COATINGS (EPA 453/R-07-004 2007/09) 

This CTG provides control recommendations for reducing VOC emissions from the use of coatings in large 

appliance coating operations. Coatings include paints, sealants, caulks, inks, adhesives, and maskants. The 

control approaches apply to facilities where the total actual VOC emissions, prior to consideration of controls, 

from all large appliance coating operations, including related cleanup activities, equals or exceeds 6.8 kg/day 

(15 lb/day). A large appliance part is defined as any organic surface-coated metal lid, door, casing, panel, or 

other interior or exterior metal part or accessory that is assembled to form a large appliance product. A large 

appliance product is also defined as any organic surface-coated metal range, oven, microwave oven, 

refrigerator, freezer, washer, dryer, dishwasher, water heater, or trash compactor manufactured for household, 

cornmercial, or recreational use. Large appliance coatings include, but are not limited to, materials referred to as 

paint, topcoats, basecoats, primers, enamels, and adhesives used in the manufacturer of large appliance parts or 

products. 

The District does not have any sources in the SFNA or atop the Sutter Buttes that apply to this CTG. 

METAL FURNITURE COATINGS (EPA 453/R-07-005 2007/09) 

This CTG provides control recommendations for reducing VOC emissions stemming from the use of coatings 

in metal furniture surface coating operations. Coatings include paints, sealants, caulks, inks adhesives, and 

maskants. The CTG would apply to each metal furniture surface coating unit at a facility where the total actual 

VOC emissions from all metal furniture coating operations, including related cleaning activities, at that facility 

are equal to or exceed 6.8 kg/day (15 lb/day). The recommended threshold level is equivalent to the 

evaporation of approximately two gallons of solvent per day. 

The District does not have any sources in the SFNA or atop the Sutter Buttes that apply to this CTG. 

MISCELLANEOUS METAL PARTS AND PLASTIC PARTS COATINGS (EPA 453/R-08-003 2008/09) 

This CTG provides control recommendations from the use of coatings in miscellaneous metal products and 

miscellaneous plastic parts surface coating operations. The recommend control approaches apply to each metal 

product and plastic parts surface coating unit at a facility where the total actual VOC emissions from all 

miscellaneous metal product and plastic parts surface coating operations, including related cleaning activities, at 

the facility are equal to or exceed 6.8 kg/day (15 lb/day). The recommended threshold is equivalent to the 

evaporation of approximately two gallons of solvent per day. Miscellaneous metal parts and plastic include, but 

are not limited to, metal and plastic components of the following types of products as well as the products 

themselves: fabricated metal products, molded plastic parts, small and large farm machinery, commercial and 

2 
industrial machinery and equipment, automotive or transportation equipment, interior or exterior automotive 

parts, construction equipment, motor vehicle accessories, bicycles and sporting goods, toys, recreational 

vehicles, pleasure craft, extruded aluminum structural components, railroad cars, heavier vehicles, lawn and 

garden equipment, business machines, laboratory and medical equipment, electronic equipment, steel drums, 

metal pipes, and numerous other household and industrial products. 

The District has one source that uses a spray booth to coat mobile equipment that has a potential to exceed 15 

lbs/day of VOC. As stated in the CTG, three Section 183(e) categories (aerosol coatings, architectural coatings, 

and automobile refinish coatings) are regulated by National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards 

(40 CFR Part 59). Automobile refinish coatings are not included in the miscellaneous metal parts or plastic 

parts coating CTG to the extent they are used for coating purposes as defined in the national VOC rules for 

Automotive Refinish Coatings (Subpart B of Part 59). The source is subject to and permitted under District 

Rule 3.19 Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations, which is consistent with the national VOC rules. 

Therefore, the District has determined that the Miscellaneous Metal Parts CTG does not apply to this source. 

The District does not have any sources in the SFNA or atop the Sutter Buttes that apply to this CTG. 

FIBERGLASS BOAT MANUFACTURING MATERIALS (EPA 453/R-08-004 2008/09) 

This CTG provides control recommendations for reducing VOC emissions from the use of gel coats, resins, and 

materials used to clean application equipment in fiberglass boat manufacturing operations. It applies to 

facilities that manufacturer hulls or decks of boats from fiberglass, or build molds to make fiberglass hulls or 

decks, and where total actual VOC emissions from all fiberglass boat manufacturing operations are equal to or 

exceed 6.8 kg/day (15 lb/day). 

The District does not have any sources in the SFNA or atop the Sutter Buttes that apply to this CTG. 

MISCELLANEOUS INDUSTRIAL ADHESIVES (EPA 453/R-08-005 2008/09) 

This CTG provides control recommendations for reducing VOC emissions from miscellaneous industrial 

adhesives and adhesives primer application processes, where total actual VOC emissions, prior to consideration 

of controls, equals or exceed 6.8 kg/day (15 lb/day). This category includes adhesives used at industrial 

manufacturing and repair facilities for a wide variety of products and equipment that operate adhesives 

application processes, but not those that are covered by another CTG. Some examples of facilities that are 

addressed in this CTG are motor vehicle adhesives, glass bonding primers, and weatherstrip adhesives that are 

used at a facility that is not an automobile or light-duty truck assembly coatings facility. 

The District does not have any sources in the SFNA or atop the Sutter Buttes that apply to this CTG. 

AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT-DUTY TRUCK ASSEMBLY COATINGS (EPA 453/R-08-006 2008/09) 

This CTG provides control recommendations for reducing VOC emissions from the use of coatings in 

automobile and light-duty truck assembly coating operations. It applies to coating operations at a facility where 

the total actual VOC emissions from all automobile and light-duty truck assembly coating operations, including 

related cleanup activities, at that facility are equal to or exceed 6.8 kg/day (15 lb/day), before consideration of 

controls. The recommended threshold is equivalent to the evaporation of approximately 2 gallons of solvent per 

day. 

The District does not have any sources in the SFNA or atop the Sutter Buttes that apply to this CTG. 

7 
NEGATIVE DECLARATION—STATEMENT OF ADOPTION 

By adoption of this document, the Feather River Air Quality Management District Board of Directors declares 

that, to the best of its knowledge, following a duly noticed public hearing, there are no existing or anticipated 

sources in the nonattainment areas atop the Sutter Buttes (above 2,000 feet elevation) or south Sutter County (as 

part of the Sacramento Federal Nonattainment Area) to which any of the eleven Control Techniques Guidelines 

promulgated by the US EPA during the period of 2006 through 2008 (Industrial Cleaning Solvents; Offset 

Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing; Flexible Package Printing; Flat Wood Paneling Coatings; Paper, 

Film, and Foil Coatings; Large Appliance Coatings; Metal Furniture Coatings; Miscellaneous Metal Parts and 

Plastic Parts Coatings; Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials; Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives; and 

Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings) apply. 

By adoption of this document, the Feather River Air Quality Management District Board of Directors further 

declares that RACT will be adopted and implemented, consistent with legal requirements, for all new and 

existing sources identified in the south Sutter County portion of the Sacramento Federal Nonattainment Area or 

atop the Sutter Buttes (above 2,000 ft elevation) to which any federally promulgated CTGs (or amendments to 

the CTGs) apply in the future. 

0 
Attachment A: 

Permitted Facilities Located in South Sutter County 

(As of March 10, 2009) 
Permitted Facilities Located in South Sutter County (As of March 10, 2009) 

(Emissions in tons/year) 

I FACILITY 

ID 

I 

COMPANY NAME I SITE ADDRESS rSITE CITY ( SITE ZIP ~ SOURCETYPE I SIC ~ THC I NOx ~ SOx I PM I 

Pleasant 

16003 Holt of California _ 7310 Pacific Avenue Grove 95668 Various Equipment 7359 8.75 5.81 0.4 0.5 

Knights 

11037 Broesch Automotive 20770 Hwy 113 

. Landing 95645 auto body 7532 _ 1.4 0 0 0 

21028 Sutter County - Trowbridge 2560 Pacific Ave. Nicolaus 95659 gas private 4941 ,: 0.99 0 0 0 

Sutter Basin Growers Knights 

6014 Cooperative 21831 Knights Road Landing _ 95645 rice/bean dryer _ 723 0.41 0.95 0.01 31.75 

Pleasant 

6004 Kennan Corporation 7235 Pacific Ave Grove 95668 rice dryer 723 0.29 0.64 0 0.95 

23009 WorldCom 3387 Riego Rd Elverta _ 95626 _ _.. _ 

ICE genset 4812 - 0.25 1.75 0.11 0.12 

6023 Murphy Lake Farms 5370 W. Riego Rd Sacamento __. ._ . 95659 rice d ryer 723 0.18 5.06 0.07 27.29 

Sysco Food Services of Pleasant 

23035 Sacramento, Inc. 7062 Pacific Ave _ Grove 95668 ICE genset 4214 0.17 3.42 0.1 0.11 

21016 Sutter Mutual Water Co. _ 15094 Cranmore Rd Kirkville 95676 gas private 4941 ; 0.12 

,. _ 0 0 __.. ; 0 

Pleasant 

23071 Clear Channel Radio 3638 Catlett Rd Grove 95668 ICE genset 4812 0.08 1.04 0.07 0.07 

James T. Sopwith, Jr dba 4850 W. Riego Rd & 

6024 Sopwith Farms 5370 W. Riego Rd Sacramento 95836 rice dryer 723 i 0.06 1.79 0.02 24 

Pleasant # 

6006 Catlett Warehouse 2138 Catlett Road Grove 95668 rice dryer 723 ~ 0.05 1.16 0.01 92.88 

6022 Gallagher Dryer _ 

1998 Plst Grove Rd _ Rio Oso 95674 _ . ...... 

rice dryer 723 ` 0.05 0.59 , 0 10.99 

6005 Premium Rice Group 17465 Highway 113 Robbins 95676 rice dryer 723 0.04 ' 1.05 0.01 35.26 ' 

Pleasant ; 

6017 Van Dyke's Rice Dryer 4036 Plst Grove Rd Grove 95668 

_ 

rice dryer 723 __ ; 0.04 _.•.....__ ' 1.4 0.5 62.84 

N/W Corner Del 

23008 GTE - Robbins C.O.- Verizon Monte/Acacia St Robbins 95676 ICE genset 4812 0.04 0.26 0 0 

SBC / Pacific Bell - East 3 

23043 Nicolaus 

........... ....... 

2570 Willow Street 

...._... East Nicolaus _ 95659 ICE genset 4812 : 0.04 0.55 _ 0.04 : 0.04 _ 

360 Networks Robbins Amp 

23014 Site 17305 Hwy 113 Robbins 95676 ICE genset 4812 : 0.03 ` 0.28 ! 0.04 0.01 

SBC / Pacific Bell - Pleasant 5495 Pleasant Grove Pleasant 

23041 Grove St Grove 95668 ICE genset 4812 : 0.03 0.32 0.02 0.02 

Pleasant 

20013 Teichert Readymix _ ` 7466 Pacific Ave Grove 95668 _....__ 

concrete batch 3273 - 0.02 0.66 0 36.13 

CEMEX Construction Pleasant 

20016 Materials Pacific, LLC 3163 Sankey Road _ Grove 95668 _ 

concrete batch 3273 0.02 0.64 0.23 : 8.26 

 _ 

23017 Level 3 Communications _... 

17305 "A" Hwy 113 Robbins 95676 _ _ 

ICE genset 4812 i 0.02 

.~.... _ 0.32 0.06 ' 0.01 

23121 AT&T Mobility __.._ -.._.._...._._._. 

1485 W. Catlett Rd _ Nicolaus 95659 Emergency ICE 4812 ~ 0.02 ; ...._ 0.05 0 0 

Pleasant 

28008 Vogt Farms. . _.._..-.......................... 

i 3825 Howsley Road 

... , ; Grove _ 95668 Animal Crematory 7261 ; 0.02 0.66 0.04 0.09 

Pleasant 

36055 Holt of California 7310 Pacific Avenue Grove 95813 8999 0.02 0 0 0 

Pleasant 

6007 EI Centro Storage 7339 Pacific Ave Grove 95668 rice d ryer 723 0.01 0.2 0.72 ' 14.23 

23034 Verizon Wireless 2290 Palm Ave Nicolaus 95659 ICE genset 4812 ; 0.01 0.02 0 0 

6003 Bianchi/Sills Dryer 8391 Plst Grove Rd Elverta 95626 rice dryer 723 ; 0 0.1 0.04 17.47 

6019 Danna Bins 14803 Highway 99 Nicolaus 95659 rice scalping _ _ ;. 723 0 _ 

0 0 3.75 

21032 Bear River Supply Inc. _ _ 218 Pleasant Grove _ _ Rio Oso 

 _. 

95674 gas private - NEW 5211 0 0 0 0 

23032 Verizon Wireless - Robbins _ 

; 319 Knights Landing _.. _ .... ._.....H_._._..__ ; Robbins 95676 ICE genset _ _. 4812 0 0 0 _ 0 

# ICE Fire Pump - 

23100 Western Wood Fabricators 3700 Riego Road : Elverta 95626 NEW 2431 ; 0 0.08 0 0 

10 
EV IS 111 - 1 i 

Feather River Air Quality Management District Board of Directors 

Negative Declaration Adoption Resolution 2009-06 

11 
FEATHER RIVER AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 

RESOLUTION ADOPTING ) 

OZ_ONE STATE ) 

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ) 

REVISION ) 

REASONABLY AVAILABLE ) 

CONTROL TECHNOLOGY AS ) 

APPLICABLE TO THE 8-HOUR ) 

OZONE STANDARD ) 

RESOLUTION NO. 2009-06 

WHEREAS, Sections 182 (b) (2) and 182 (f) of the federal Clean Air Act requires areas in ozone nonattainment areas 

to implement Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for all source categories for which the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) has published a Control Technique Guideline (CTG) document and for rnajor sources of volatile 

organic compounds (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx); and 

WHEREAS, two parts of the FRAQMD are designated nonattainment for the national ambient air quality standard 

(NAAQS) for 8-hour ozone: southern Sutter County (as part of the Sacramento Federal Nonattainment Area or SFNA) as 

serious nonattainment and atop (>2,000 ft) of Sutter Butte as nonattainment; and 

WHEREAS, EPA published the final Phase 2 Rule to implement the 8-Hour ozone air quality standard on November 

29, 2005 (70 FR 71611), which includes a federal requirement (40 CFR 51.912) for the District to submit a revision to the 

Ozone State Implementation Plan (SIP) that meets the RACT requirements of Sections 182 (b)(2) and 182 (f) of the federal 

Clean Air Act; and 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Feather River Air Quality Management District adopted Resolution 2006- 

10 Ozone State Implementation Plan Revision Reasonably Available Control Technology as Applicable to the 8-Hour Ozone 

Standard on December 4, 2006, which considered CTG's developed by the US EPA prior to 2006; and 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Feather River Air Quality Management District has considered the 

Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision for which presents an 

analysis of the District's rules and regulations that implement RACT for the required CTG categories issued 2006 through 

2008 and major sources of VOC and/or NOx (as defined in Sections 182 (c) and 182 (f) of the federal Clean Air Act); and 

WHEREAS, District staff found no sources within the Sutter Buttes nonattainment area; the District also does not 

anticipate any major or non-major CTG category sources in the future. Therefore, neither RACT analysis nor CTG category 

analysis is required the Sutter Buttes nonattainment area; and 

WHEREAS, District staff evaluated all permitted sources in the south Sutter County portion of the SFNA and found 

no major sources; therefore, no RACT analysis for major sources is required; and 

WHEREAS, District staff has listed 2006 through 2008 CTG categories for non-major sources in south Sutter portion 

of the SFNA in the RACT SIP Revision and found no sources applicable to CTG categories. The District staff does not 

anticipate any non-major CTG category sources in the future; if sources are identified District has committed to adopt and 

implement RACT; and 

WHEREAS, the District published a notice of the public hearing on May 1, 2009, on the draft RACT SIP Revision in 

a newspaper of general circulation; and 

WHEREAS, the FRAQMD Board of Directors held a duly noticed public hearing on June 1, 2009, in accordance 

-1 - 
with Section 1 10(I) of the federal Clean Air Act and considered public comments on the proposed revision to the Ozone SIP; 

and 

WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061 (bx3) of the State CEQA 

Guidelines exempts projects for which it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may 

have a significant adverse effect on the environment; and 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Feather River Air Quality 

Management District determines that the proposed revision to the Ozone SIP meets the requirements of Sections 

182(b)(2) and 182 (f) of the federal Clean Air Act and the requirement of 40 CFR 51.912; and 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Feather River Air Quality Management District 

determines that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that adoption of the proposed revision to the Ozone SIP 

may have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and therefore, is exempt from CEQA under Section 15061 (b) (3) of 

the State CEQA Guidelines; and 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Feather River Air Quality Management District 

hereby adopts the proposed RACT SIP Revision as a revision to the Ozone SIP. 

BE IT ORDERED that the RACT SIP Revision be submitted to the California Air Resources Board for inclusion 

in the Ozone SIP. 

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Feather River Air Quality Management District at its regular meeting of June 

1, 2009, by the following vote: 

AYES: Directors Nicoletti, Griego, Montna, Munger, Fortino, Selvidge, Gill 

and Pendergraph 

NOES: None 

ABSENT: Director Abe 

ABSTAIN: None 

ATTEST: 

CLERK OF TI-IE DISTRICT BOARD 

~ 

~ 

/ 

► 

/ 

h iunan 

~ 

APPROVED FOR LEGAL FORM 

t4ogk District Legal Counsel 

-2 - 
Attachment C : 

Evidence of Public Notice for Public Hearing 

and Adoption of Negative Declaration 

12 
APPEAL-DEMOCRAT 'I'his space is for the County Clerk's filing stamp. 

1530 Ellis hake I)rive, P.O. Box 431, Marysville, CA 95901 

(530) 741-1345 

Affidavit of Publication 

(2015.5 C. C. P) 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 

Counties of Yuba and Sutter 

May 1, 2009 

I declare under penalty of perjury 

that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed at Marysville, California 

May 1, 2009 

Date: 

2_ (--~ 

f `;=~'~,~ 

(Signature) 

PROOF OF PUBLICATION 

NOTICE OF PUbUC HEARING 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Feather River Air 61ua1- 

ity Management District ('District') will conduct q 

piOblic hearing on Monday, June l, 2009 afi 4:00 

. p m. in the Yuba Couniy Govemment Center, Confe~ence Room #1 located at 915 8th Street, Marysvi(le, CA. The purpose of the hearing is to receive 

comments and consider the adoption of the draff 

TZeasonably Available Control. Technology (RACT) 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision Negative 

D'eclaration for Control Techniques Guidelines lssiied 2006-2008, pursuant to Sections 182 (b)(2) 

qnd 182 (f) of the federal Clean Air Act. 

The RACT SIP Revision and all supporting documerr 

tcsfion are available upo n request form David A. 

Valler, Jr., Air Pollufion Control Office ( APCO'), 938 

14th Street, Marysville, CA (530) 634-7659, as on the 

•District's website: www.fraqmd:org. . 

$}( this notice, fhe public is also invited to comment 

in writing on the ' dr4ft RACT SIP Revision. AII written 

'comments submitted to the, above address must 

)?e . addressed to David A. Valler, Jr., APCO, and 

rriust be received .no later than 5:00 p:rn. on.;May 

1$11 2009. For more„inforrrmation, contact the Disfrict 

afi :<530) 634-7659 or on . the Internet at 

www.fraqmd.org . 

4,jiciy 1 2009 Ad #00071971 

Feather River Air Quality Management District 

Hearing Notice 

I am not a party to, nor interested in the above entitled 

matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and 

publisher of THE APPEAL-DEMOCRAT, a newspaper 

of general circulation, printed & published in the City 

of Marysville, County of Yuba, to which Newspaper 

has been adjudged a newspaper of general circuiation 

by The Superior Court of the County of Yuba, State of 

California under the date of November 9, 1951, No. 

11481, and County of Sutter to which Newspaper 

has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation 

by the Superior Court of the County of Sutter, State of 

California under the date of May 17, 1999, Case No. 

CV PT99-0819 that the notice of which the annexed 

is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than 

nonpareil), has been published in each regular and 

entire issue of said newspaper and not in any 

supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 
AGENDA SUbIlKARY 

Backup materials pertaining to this agenda as well as materials related to an 

item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of the agenda 

packet are available for public inspection in the District's office located at 

938 14th Street, Marysville, California, during normal business hours. 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS, FEATHER RIVER AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 

Mond.ay, June 1, at 4:00 p.m. 

Yuba County Government Center 

915 8th Street, Conference Room #2, Marysville, CA 

JOHN NICOLETTI - YUBA COUNTY SUPERVISOR 

MARY JANE GRIEGO - YUHA COUNTY SUPERVISOR 

ROGER ABE - YUBA COUNTY SUPERVISOR 

LARRY MONTNA - SUTTER COUNTY SUPERVISOR 

LARRY MUNGER - SUTTER COUNTY SUPERVISOR 

AL FORTINO - LIVE OAK CITY REPRESENTATIVE 

MIKE SELVIDGE - MARYSVILLE CITY REPRESENTATIVE 

JAY PENDERGRAPH - WHEATLAND CITY REPRESENTATIVE 

KASH GILL - YUBA CITY REPRESENTATIVE 

REGULAR MEETING/CALL TO ORDER 

Roll Call 

PUBLIC CObMNTS 

Members of the public may address the Board at this time on any items of public 

interest that are not on this agenda but are within the Board's subject matter 

jurisdiction. However, subject to three excepti.ons, the Ralph M. Brown Act 

prohibits the Board from taking action on any matter not appearing on this 

agenda. Items marked with an asterisk are "action" items. 

APPROVAL OF MINUTES 

* 1} Approve the minutes of the April 6, 2009 Board meeting. 

* 2) Approve the minutes of the April 22, 2009 Special Board meeting. 

PUBLIC HEARING 

* 3) Continued Public Hearing from 04/06/09 to approve Resolution #2009- 

03 amending Regulation X, Rule 10.1 New Source Review to include 

language recommended by the California Air Resources Board and the 

USEPA for clarity and enforceability and authorize the Chairman to 

execute related documents. 

* 4) Approve Resolution #2009-07 adopting Regulation III, Rule 3.22 

Stationary Internal Combustion Engines and authorize the Chairman to 

execute related documents. 

* 5) Approve Resolution 2009-06 adopting Ozone State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) Revision Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) as 

Applicable to the 8-hour Ozone Standard and authorize the Chairman 

to execute related documents. 

* 6) Adoption of Final District Budget. 
AGENDA 

* 7) Approve Resolution #2009-08 setting the Basic Salary Schedule for 

fiscal year 2009/10 and authorize the Chairman to execute related 

documents. 

* 8) Approve budget allocation transfers within funds #725 and #727. 

* 9) Approve the use of AB2766 funds to contribute to First Thursday Dinners. 

10) Air Pollution Control Officer's report on District activities: 

American Lung Association Annual State of the Air Report; Air Quality email alert system; district office relocation 

* 11) Board member reports: Board members may report on activities or raise 

issues for placement on future agendas. 

~ 61009, 

Requests for disability-related accommodations to allow persons with a 

disability to participate in this meeting must be submitted in writing to the 

Air Pollution Control Officer at the Feather River Air Quality Management 

District office at least 72 hours prior to the date and time of this meeting. 

Requests must describe the specific accommodation sought. 
1007 Live Oak Blvd., Suite B-3 

Yuba City, CA 95991 

(530) 634-7659 

FAX (530) 634-7660 

www.fraqmd.org 

David A. Valler, .Jr. 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

i~ 

, 

0 

m MaNQG~ 

Serving Sutter and Yuba Counties 

Feather River Air Quality Management District 

Board of Directors 

Public Hearing, June 1, 2009 

Item 5: Approve Resolution 2009-06 adopting Ozone State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision 

Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) as applicable to the 8-hour Ozone Standard 

and authorized the Chairman to execute related documents. 

No public comments received at the public hearing on this item. 

The District did not receive any written public comments on this item prior to the public hearing. 

Public Hearing Comments: RACT S1P Revision