alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UTAH STATE ROAD COMMISSION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Wilburn D. HELM et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. 14181.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 23, 1976.

Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., Stephen C. Ward, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Jackson Howard, of Howard, Lewis & Petersen, Provo, for Helm and Dambrosi.

W. Robert Wright, of Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough, Salt Lake City, for Uinta Oil.

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict for defendants in a condemnation case. Affirmed.

The subject property was taken after summons served on April 30, 1974. Everyone conceded that that was the date when compensable value became issuable. All the experts testified as to the value as of that date. Four years before; state agents had indicated to the property owners and the lessee who ran a service station, of a contemplated condemnation to widen the highway. Consequently, the lessee closed the station then, but continued payments under the lease.

The State assigns as Points on Appeal:

I. Error in allowing testimony as to why the station was closed, to which contention we see no merit, since it is obvious from the record that closure would be imminent, and hence, such fact was a legitimate item which appraisers rightly could canvass in determining the value as of April 30, 1974, in light of the tenancy period factor.

II. Error in allowing introduction of photos of the resulting demolition of the station, which urgence seems of little import with respect to the condemnation date, but was of pertinent interest in calculating the fractional damage inuring to the benefit or detriment of the lessors and the lessee, — who were necessary parties here.

III. Error in rejecting evidence of gallonage sold up to the time the station *693was closed, — four years before, — which would seem unmeritorious, because the four year term factor of non-business, plus managerial and other matters would appear to have made such evidence remote, leading to conjecture, and irrespective of that,— not of such substantial nature, in light of the pre-eminence of expert testimony presented or presentable by either or both sides, as seriously to justify a conclusion of prejudice justifying reversal.

ELLETT, CROCKETT, TUCKETT and MAUGHAN, JJ., concur.
#### State v. Coleman

24662

10/29/2003

Affirmed
I f aUf btu Derv 1D : uu kA A *IU 4So 6996 EAP LBNL 1003.

S T DJ Lw E

. E L Y "T" ! A L E3 D R T Y

Er. rgy and Environment Division, Energy Analysis Program

1 Cyclotron Road. MS 90/4000 Berkeley, California 94720

TO:

X

FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLASTS WORKSHOP JUNE 20, 1996 COMMENT 04
o a m t 8

I

2

g

FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLASTS WORKSHOP JUNE 20, 1996 COMMENT 04
NZ6

AQ^

K

0

FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLASTS WORKSHOP JUNE 20, 1996 COMMENT 04
FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLASTS WORKSHOP JUNE 20, 1996 COMMENT 04
X

c a

A p 9

.4

E

FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLASTS WORKSHOP JUNE 20, 1996 COMMENT 04
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,023-01

EX PARTE RANDY WAYNE TUCKER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR13-410A IN THE 235TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM COOKE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O RDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession with

intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed

to timely file a notice of appeal. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte

Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. 
2

As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is

the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order counsel to respond to

Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. The trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent

Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

timely informed counsel that he wanted an appeal, and if so, what actions counsel took to facilitate

that appeal. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it

deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: April 15, 2015

Do not publish
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Public Accountants

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Central and South West
Corporation:

      As independent public accountants,  we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated February 12, 1999,  included in this Form 10-K, into Central
and South West Corporation's  previously filed  registration  statements on Form
S-8 (File Nos. 2-70746, 33-12992,  33-49301,  33-63027 and 33-64233) and on Form
S-3 (File Nos. 33-50193 and 333-00911).

Arthur Andersen LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 10, 1999



                                      4-20
#### William Dale DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-75-38.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 2, 1976.

ORDER MODIFYING JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE

WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States, in *Davis v. Oklahoma,*— U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2978, 49 L.Ed.2d —, has vacated the opinion of this Court affirming the judgment and sentence rendered in the above styled and numbered *816cause insofar as it left undisturbed the death sentence and remanded this cause for reconsideration of this Court in the light of *Woodson et al. v. North Carolina,*— U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2978, 49 L.Ed.2d — (1976) and *Roberts v.*Louisiana,-U. S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3001, 49 L.Ed.2d — (1976);

AND WHEREAS, this Court has this date, in *Riggs v. Branch,*Okl.Cr., 554 P.2d 823, reconsidered its prior holding in *Davis v. State,*Okl.Cr., 542 P.2d 532, and vacated and set aside that opinion insofar as it is inconsistent- with *Riggs v. Branch,*supra.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THE ORDER OF THIS COURT, that the judgment and sentence rendered in the District Court, Oklahoma County, Case No. CRF-74-1175, be, and the same is hereby, modified from a sentence of death, to a sentence of life imprisonment at hard labor. The Clerk of this Court is directed to issue the Mandate FORTHWITH.

WITNESS OUR HANDS, and the Seal of this Court, this 2nd day of September, 1976.

TOM BRETT, P. J.,

HEZ J. BUSSEY, J.,

C. F. BLISS, Jr., J.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 Ameren Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Ratios)
 Year Ended December 31,2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006Net income from continuing operations
    
    $
    382,065
    
    
    $
    524,145
    
    
    $
    529,884
    
    
    $
    605,725
    
    
    $
    546,738Less- Change in accounting principle
    
    
    
    
    
    
    18,416
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (22,135
    )
    
    
    Less- Minority interest
    
    
    (13,627
    )
    
    
    (7,050
    )
    
    
    (4,201
    )
    
    
    (3,231
    )
    
    
    (27,135
    )Add- Taxes based on income
    
    
    236,320
    
    
    
    301,209
    
    
    
    282,558
    
    
    
    356,016
    
    
    
    283,825Net income before income taxes, change in
accounting principle and minority interest
    
    
    632,012
    
    
    
    813,988
    
    
    
    816,643
    
    
    
    987,107
    
    
    
    857,698Add- fixed charges:Interest on long term debt
    
    
    210,481
    
    
    
    271,525
    
    
    
    269,868
    
    
    
    297,822
    
    
    
    345,410Estimated interest cost within rental expense
    
    
    2,852
    
    
    
    4,169
    
    
    
    3,185
    
    
    
    4,208
    
    
    
    4,081Amortization of net debt premium, discount,
and expenses
    
    
    8,260
    
    
    
    10,210
    
    
    
    12,983
    
    
    
    14,687
    
    
    
    15,341Subsidiary preferred stock dividends
    
    
    10,841
    
    
    
    10,861
    
    
    
    11,089
    
    
    
    12,745
    
    
    
    10,936Adjust preferred stock dividends to pre-tax
basis
    
    
    6,706
    
    
    
    6,469
    
    
    
    5,913
    
    
    
    7,227
    
    
    
    5,565Total fixed charges
    
    
    239,140
    
    
    
    303,234
    
    
    
    303,038
    
    
    
    336,689
    
    
    
    381,333Less: Adjustment of preferred stock dividends to pre-tax basis
    
    
    6,706
    
    
    
    6,469
    
    
    
    5,913
    
    
    
    7,227
    
    
    
    5,565Earnings available for fixed charges
    
    $
    864,446
    
    
    $
    1,110,753
    
    
    $
    1,113,768
    
    
    $
    1,316,569
    
    
    $
    1,233,466Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    3.61
    
    
    
    3.66
    
    
    
    3.67
    
    
    
    3.91
    
    
    
    3.23
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,347,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,494,329
<PP&E>                                      50,631,214
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,961,731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,163,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,141,148
<BONDS>                                      3,419,785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,602,879
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,163,812
<SALES>                                      4,706,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,433,563
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,819,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             264,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,649,940)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,649,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,649,940)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          16,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  791,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          35,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 855,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        452,672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           395
<OTHER-SE>                                     249,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   855,376
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,661
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,011
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,011
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (3,976)
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,035
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

            CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  ATEL  Cash
Distribution Fund IV, LP;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material  information  relating to the registrant is made known
     to us by others within the entity,  particularly during the period in which
     this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
     procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
     effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal  quarter that has  materially  affected or is  reasonably  likely to
     materially   affect  the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
     reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
     over financial reporting.



Date:          August 11, 2004


/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
-----------------------------------------------------------
Paritosh K. Choksi
Principal Financial Officer of Registrant, Executive
Vice President of General Partner
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 27, 2006 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NCAH PORTAL CVB QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE

Requesting Confirmatory Testing of Product Serials 

(Prelicense, Outline Change, or Technology Transfer)

21

Page left intentionally blank. As this user guide is updated, the most 

recent changes will be listed here for ease of use.

Publication Date: 8/9/17 Page 1
NCAH PORTAL CVB QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE 21

Publication Date: 8/9/17 Page 2

If a product serial requires confirmatory testing by the CVB, use the following portal process to request testing. 

In the Remarks section, enter the name of the CVB Reviewer for the product.

Requesting Confirmatory Testing of Product Serials 

(Prelicense, Outline Change, or Technology Transfer)

1. Submit the supporting APHIS Form 2008 for each serial via the portal, using the procedure described in NCAH Portal User Guide 5.

In the field marked “Disposition by Firm”, select one of the following, as applicable.

• Other-Prelicense

• Other-Outline Change

• Other-Technology Transfer

Do not select Eligible for Release.

2. Request authorization to submit samples for confirmatory testing after submitting the 2008.

• Submit the request to CVB-PEL, using the portal interface for APHIS Form 2049.

• Attach APHIS Form 2072 with details of the request (preferred), or include equivalent detail in a letter.

• In block 10 of APHIS Form 2072, cite the date APHIS Form 2008 was submitted via the portal. It is not

necessary to attach a copy of the 2008 form. If using a letter to communicate this information, state that the

2008 was submitted via the portal on <date>.

NOTE: This procedure applies ONLY to production serials. Do notsubmit test resultsfor Master Seeds, Master Cells, or 

experimental products via the APHIS 2008 interface in the NCAH Portal.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply615Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Michael J. Lil... (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 3, 2019 - 5:27pmAs a retired construction mechanic, a plumber,  your sharing with me is a gift into the past.  So many of my memories are from what was found during  renovations.  Please keep these "finds" coming
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe