alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Indian Ceremony
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

EverGreene Painting Studios

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1994

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

An unusual combination of dancers in Hopi and Navajo costumes performs a ceremony.About the Cox Corridors MuralsThe first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The western north-south corridor, called the Westward Expansion corridor, includes maps and scenes showing the growth of the United States from early exploration through the acquisition of Alaska and Hawaii. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply610Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Gale Flores (n... (not verified)PermalinkNovember 30, 2018 - 11:45amWhat a wonderful job to do...finding a tree for the whole nation to enjoy! Christmas truly unites us all! Great job..I pray the tradition of Capitol tree continues!!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4724-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-4724-DR), dated August 10, 2023, and related determinations.

      ( print page 83571)    

# DATES:

The amendment was issued October 11, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident for this disaster has been expanded to include high winds.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-26274 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

11.   Declaration on Article 17(6) and (7) of the Treaty on European Union

Declaration on Article 17(6) and (7) of the Treaty on European Union

The Conference considers that, in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties, the European Parliament and the European Council are jointly responsible for the smooth running of the process leading to the election of the President of the European Commission. Prior to the decision of the European Council, representatives of the European Parliament and of the European Council will thus conduct the necessary consultations in the framework deemed the most appropriate. These consultations will focus on the backgrounds of the candidates for President of the Commission, taking account of the elections to the European Parliament, in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 17(7). The arrangements for such consultations may be determined, in due course, by common accord between the European Parliament and the European Council.

---
| Form      S-3 | Registration      No. 333-54722     |   |                                |
|---------------|-------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|          | Registration      No. 333-54722-01  |   |                                |
|          | Registration      No. 333-54722-02  |   |                                |
|          | Registration      No. 333-117470    |   |                                |
|          | Registration      No. 333-117470-01 |   |                                |
|          | Registration      No. 333-117470-02 |   |                                |
|          | Registration      No. 333-72893     |   |                                |
|          | Registration      No. 333-155165    |   |                                |
|          | Registration      No. 333-155165-01 |   |                                |
|          | Registration      No. 333-155165-02 |   |                                |
|          |                                |   |                                |
| Form      S-8 | Registration      No. 33-55083      |   | Registration      No. 333-68790-02  |
|          | Registration      No. 33-55083-01   |   | Registration      No. 333-100682    |
|          | Registration      No. 33-55083-02   |   | Registration      No. 333-100682-01 |
|          | Registration      No. 333-28229     |   | Registration      No. 333-100682-02 |
|          | Registration      No. 333-28229-01  |   | Registration      No. 333-103440    |
|          | Registration      No. 333-28229-02  |   | Registration      No. 333-103440-01 |
|          | Registration      No. 333-55717     |   | Registration      No. 333-103440-02 |
|          | Registration      No. 333-55717-01  |   | Registration      No. 333-107701    |
|          | Registration      No. 333-55717-02  |   | Registration      No. 333-107701-01 |
|          | Registration      No. 333-74185     |   | Registration      No. 333-107701-02 |
|          | Registration      No. 333-74185-01  |   | Registration      No. 333-109869    |
|          | Registration      No. 333-74185-02  |   | Registration      No. 333-109869-01 |
|          | Registration      No. 333-86041     |   | Registration      No. 333-109869-02 |
|          | Registration      No. 333-86041-01  |   | Registration      No. 333-110269    |
|          | Registration      No. 333-86041-02  |   | Registration      No. 333-110269-01 |
|          | Registration      No. 333-37956     |   | Registration      No. 333-110269-02 |
|          | Registration      No. 333-68790     |   | Registration      No. 33-44575      |
|          | Registration      No. 333-68790-01  |   | Registration      No. 333-152395    |

|   |  /s/      ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
|--------|--------------------------------------|

----
p. 1


# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 20DIV-E-7 5 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:58 PM

Sheet 201 of 242P. 2

$ A\ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y IjS^ftZ * AN N ARBOR
. MICHIGA N 4810 5 

### A-87-? /

jJ-S-7 *
OC T2 4 I98 8 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Telephon e Conversatio n wit h Rober t H . Thompson , Stan t FROM : Joh

n W . Mueller , Mechanica l Enginee r Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Bran e TO : Public.Docke t A-87-1 1 THRU : Joh

n F . Anderson , Senio r Projec t Manage r Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h 

# U.tU—

On Octobe r 6 , 198 8 I ha d a telephon e conversatio n wit h Rober t H . Thompson , Projec t Enginee r o f Stan t concerning a fiel d surveyo f in-us e fue l dispensing nozzle s performe d b y Stan t i n Marc h o f 1988 . Mr . Thompso n explaine d tha t the survey wa s conducte d t o asses s the in-us e conditio n o f dispensing nozzle s an

d determin e whethe r in-us e spou t damag e woul d be a problemi n designing a mechanica l fillnec k sea l for a n onboard refueling vapo r recover ysystem . He sai d tha t th e nozzle s surveye d wer e typicall yroun d an d in good shape . Additionally , no shar

p burr s or nick s wer e note d on th e spouts . Thi s h e attribute d t o th

e effec t o f th

e nozzl e hange r dressin g th e spou t a s i t i s replace d on the dispensing unit . Finally , onl y a ver ysmal l numbe r o f nozzle s surveye d wer e slightl y out-of-roun

d fro mbein g ru n ove r b

ya vehicle . H e conclude d b y sayin g tha t th

e frequencyo f spou t damag e wa s muc h les s than expecte d an

d tha t i t woul d pos e n o problem s for mechanica l seals . Acop

yo f th

e surveyi s include d i n Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 a s a

n attachmen t t o Docke t ite mIV-E-47 . 6455 W

.b \ C l [ ^
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeWhat We DoMajor Projects
Children's Garden Improvements
        
                  The Basics
      
Location
    U.S. Botanic Garden Conservatory

Status
    Completed
End Date
    2017

Contact
      
For additional questions related to this project please contact Devin Dotson, USBG Public Affairs Specialist, at 202.306.6743.The United States Botanic Garden (USBG) and Architect of the Capitol has updated the Children's Garden in the USBG Conservatory.

The Children's Garden is a favorite exploration space for families from around the D.C., Maryland and Virginia area and visitors with children from across the globe.

Improvements include a new platform climbing structure, a new vine tunnel, a new digging area, expanded seating areas and additional shade structures. Spaces to dig, explore, plant, water and care for plants remain in the updated garden.

The project took place during winter and spring when the Children's Garden is normally closed. The pathways throughout the Conservatory remained open for visitors during the project. The Children's Garden reopened to the public in June 2017.
          
    
      

      We love our jobs. Do you? Come work with us.
        View Job Listings Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Neal Shoopak, Plaintiff, *v.*United States Rubber Company et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Westchester County,

January 12, 1959.

*202
      *Arthur, Dry & Dole*for United States Rubber Company, defendant.

*Turkewits S Tessel*for plaintiff.

James W. Bailey, J.

Defendant United States Rubber Company makes this motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action of the complaint upon the ground that they do not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when a tire allegedly manufactured by the moving defendant exploded while he was inflating and attempting to mount the same upon the wheel of an automobile of a customer.

The first cause of action is predicated upon the negligence of the defendant. It contains allegations that defendant manufactured a tire with “ worn, weak and defective bead wires, improperly inserted and wound in the tire.” Plaintiff also alleges that “ the bead of said tire was embedded, enclosed, packaged, sealed and covered within said tire when said tire was manufactured ” and “that said tire was designed and intended to contain large volumes of air under great pressure and was inherently dangerous to life and limb if manufactured, or sold, or distributed ' * * * with a defective bead and bead wires. ’ ’

The court must assume the truth of these allegations upon a motion of this- nature. Under the circumstances a sufficient cause of action in negligence for a latent defect is alleged against the manufacturer. (See *Rosebrock*v. *General Elec. Co.,*236 N. Y. 227; *MacPherson*v. *Buick Motor Co.,*217 N. Y. 382; *Statler*v. *Ray Mfg. Co., 195 N.*Y. 478; *Torgesen*v. *Schultz,*192 N. Y. 156.)

The second cause of action repeats the allegations of the first except as to the negligence and seeks a recovery upon the theory of a breach of warranty. The rule is fundamental that no recovery may be had for breach of warranty in the absence of privity. Although the doctrine of privity has been extended to permit recovery when the injurious article has been purchased by an agent for the injured party the doctrine has not been completely extinguished so as to enable a recovery under the circumstances herein where no contractual relation exists between the parties or their agents. (See *Bowman*v. *Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.,*284 App. Div. 663, affd. 308 N. Y. 780; *Campo*v. *Scofield,*
      *203301 N. Y. 468; *Turner*v. *Edison Stor. Battery Co.,*248 N. Y. 73.) The second cause of action is therefore legally insufficient.

Motion granted as to second cause of action but denied as to first cause of action.

Submit order accordingly.
H. Res. 295 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 10, 2015. 

Whereas the United States Department of Justice issued a 

report titled, ‘‘Police Officer Body-Worn Cameras’’, 

which details a number of benefits of body-worn cameras, 

including— 

(1) increased transparency and citizen views of police legitimacy; 

(2) improved behavior and civility among both police 

officers and citizens; and 

(3) increased evidentiary benefits that expedite resolution of citizen complaints or lawsuits and improving 

evidence for arrest and prosecution; and 

Whereas the University of Cambridge’s Institute of Criminology conducted a 12-month study on the use of bodyworn cameras used by law enforcement in the United 

Kingdom and estimated that the cameras led to a 50 percent reduction in use of force, and in addition, complaints 

against police fell approximately by 90 percent: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes all law enforcement agencies and officers for their tireless work to protect us and make our 

communities safer; 
2 

•HRES 295 EH 

(2) recognizes the potential for the use of bodyworn cameras by on-duty law enforcement officers to improve community relations, increase transparency, and 

protect both citizens and police; and 

(3) encourages State and local law enforcement 

agencies to consider the use of body-worn cameras, including policies and protocols to handle privacy, storage, 

and other relevant concerns. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply442Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Robert Gift (n... (not verified)PermalinkApril 27, 2016 - 5:28pmWonderful article!_x000D_ Wish that James Saenger could play our relatively new carillon at Denver University.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Louis Aiello, Respondent, *v.*Louis Baldasare, Appellant, et al., Defendant. Louis Baldasare, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*Louis Aiello, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

January 23, 1959.

*450
      *Harry Zeitlan*for appellant.

*Frank A. Bell-ucci*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The appeal from judgment should be dismissed. The judgment was entered by default, and no appeal lies from a default judgment. *(Grushaw*v. *Grushaw,*281 App. Div. 1031.) Appeal from the original order dismissed. This order was rendered a nullity by the order granting the defendant’s motion for reargument. *(Kamen*v. *Kamen,*284 App. Div. 1047.) Order granting the defendant’s motion for reargument unanimously modified by striking therefrom the condition that the defendant-appellant post a bond or other cash security to secure the payment of the judgment and, as so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to the defendant-appellant. The case is set down at the head of the Ready Day Calendar for February 9, 1959, subject to the approval of the Justice then presiding.

The record shows that the default herein was not willful. It was, therefore, improper to require the defendant to post a bond or other security as a condition for opening it. The imposition of the condition that the judgment stand as security was sufficient. *(Schlein*v. *Schlein,*276 App. Div. 951; *Gustavus J. Esselen, Inc.*v. *Visor,*180 Misc. 537.)

Concur — Pette, Hart and Di Giovanna, JJ.

Appeal dismissed, etc.