alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Timothy Sherlock, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated:June 19, 2007   /s/ Timothy Sherlock Timothy Sherlock  Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and VP of Finance
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 17 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 17

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit the 
consideration of a concurrent resolution to provide for a recess of the 
  House after July 31 of any year unless the House has approved each 
          regular appropriation bill for the next fiscal year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2015

 Mr. Wittman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit the 
consideration of a concurrent resolution to provide for a recess of the 
  House after July 31 of any year unless the House has approved each 
          regular appropriation bill for the next fiscal year.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Stay on Schedule (S.O.S.) 
Resolution''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING RECESS DURING AUGUST UNTIL APPROVAL OF ALL REGULAR 
              APPROPRIATION BILLS.

    Rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives is amended by 
adding at the end the following new clause:
``Concurrent resolution providing for adjournment during August
    ``12. If by July 31 of any calendar year the House has not passed 
each of the regular appropriation bills for the fiscal year which 
begins on October 1 of that calendar year, it shall not be in order to 
consider a concurrent resolution to provide that the House stand 
adjourned during any day occurring during August of that calendar year 
until the House has passed each such bill. For purposes of this clause, 
the term `regular appropriation bill' means any annual appropriation 
bill which is under the jurisdiction of a single subcommittee of the 
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives (as may be 
provided under the Rules for the fiscal year involved).''.
                                 <all>
```
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply572Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Sidney McNeil ... (not verified)PermalinkAugust 16, 2017 - 9:45pmPriceless! Thank you for sharing and caring.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Sept. 24, 2001

23810

#### State v. Grindling

Dismissed
November 18, 1998

20548

#### State v. Clark

Affirmed
# C_2016202EN.01018901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/189 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/189

---

Article 328

(ex Articles 27a to 27e, 40 to 40b and 43 to 45 TEU and ex Articles 11 and 11a TEC)

(ex Articles 27a

e

b

a

1.   When enhanced cooperation is being established, it shall be open to all Member States, subject to compliance with any conditions of participation laid down by the authorising decision. It shall also be open to them at any other time, subject to compliance with the acts already adopted within that framework, in addition to those conditions.

The Commission and the Member States participating in enhanced cooperation shall ensure that they promote participation by as many Member States as possible.

2.   The Commission and, where appropriate, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy shall keep the European Parliament and the Council regularly informed regarding developments in enhanced cooperation.

---
#### State v. Yu

17103

9/08/95

Affirmed
164 P.3d 789

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

August 7, 2007

27858

#### State v. Fujioka

Affirmed
**Exhibit 32.1**
***CERTIFICATIONS***
I, Brian E. Dearing, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI NetworkServices, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report.     Date: December 15, 2004          By: /s/ Brian E. Dearing     By: Brian E. Dearing Title: Chairman, President and CEO
This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed bythe Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
119 P.3d 623

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

September 9, 2005

25859

#### Ochs v. Hawaii Medical Service Ass’n

Affirmed
25802

#### State v. Sumner

Affirmed
**Central
      Illinois Public Service Company**
      **Computation
      Of Ratio Of Earnings To Fixed Charges And Preferred Stock Dividend
      Requirements**
      **(Thousands
      of Dollars, Except Ratios)****Year
      Ended December 31,****2000**
    
    **2001**
    
    **2002**
    
    **2003**
    
    **2004**Net
      Income
    
    $
    79,362
    
    $
    45,309
    
    $
    26,355
    
    $
    28,474
    
    $
    32,463Add-
      Extraordinary items net of tax
    
    
    -
    
    
    -
    
    
    -
    
    
    -
    
    
    -Net
      income from continuing operations
    
    
    79,362
    
    
    45,309
    
    
    26,355
    
    
    28,474
    
    
    32,463Taxes
      based on income
    
    
    43,661
    
    
    28,245
    
    
    16,955
    
    
    6,245
    
    
    16,135Net
      income before income taxes
    
    
    123,023
    
    
    73,554
    
    
    43,310
    
    
    34,719
    
    
    48,598Add-
      fixed charges:Interest
      on long term debt
    
    
    28,935
    
    
    33,523
    
    
    38,625
    
    
    32,338
    
    
    30,533Other
      interest
    
    
    8,497
    
    
    4,750
    
    
    978
    
    
    780
    
    
    839Amortization
      of net debt premium, discount,expenses
      and losses
    
    
    2,880
    
    
    993
    
    
    1,076
    
    
    935
    
    
    903Total
      fixed charges
    
    
    40,312
    
    
    39,266
    
    
    40,679
    
    
    34,053
    
    
    32,275Earnings
      available for fixed charges
    
    $
    163,335
    
    $
    112,820
    
    $
    83,989
    
    $
    68,772
    
    $
    80,873Ratio
      of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    4.05
    
    
    2.87
    
    
    2.06
    
    
    2.01
    
    
    2.50Earnings
      required for preferred dividends:Preferred
      stock dividends
    
    
    3,882
    
    
    3,627
    
    
    3,158
    
    
    2,973
    
    
    2,512Adjustment
      to pre-tax basis
    
    
    2,135
    
    
    2,260
    
    
    2,031
    
    
    651
    
    
    1,2486,017
    
    
    5,887
    
    
    5,189
    
    
    3,624
    
    
    3,760Fixed
      charges plus preferred stock dividendrequirements
    
    $
    46,329
    
    $
    45,153
    
    $
    45,868
    
    $
    37,677
    
    $
    36,035Ratio
      of earnings to fixed charges pluspreferred
      stock dividend requirements
    
    
    3.52
    
    
    2.49
    
    
    1.83
    
    
    1.82
    
    
    2.24
Opinion issued July 18, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00362-CR

———————————

CEDRICK JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1458792

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Cedrick Johnson, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal in 

compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). The State has not opposed this motion. We have not issued a decision in the 

appeal. 
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss 

any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Kelly, and Goodman.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
### In The Matter Of: EPA Bristol Bay Public Meeting -- Iliamna August 15, 2014 Midnight Sun Court Reporters 511 W. 9th Ave. Anchorage, AK 99501 Ph. 907-258-7100 Fax 907-276-6727

To open files, click on the desired file type in bookmark on left. For quick saving or searching multiple files, click attachments tab (or paperclip) on left. For best viewing/searching, use Adobe Reader/Acrobat ver. 9 or higher (www.adobe.com).
Good Neighbor Environmental Board



### Agenda

Tuesday

, June 4 , 201 3

12pm

– 4pm

Call

- in: 866

- 299

- 31 88 , conference code: 2022330068

12:00 (EST) Welcome and Introductions

Mark Joyce

, Associate Director

GNEB Act ing Designated Federal Officer

Cynthia Jones

- Ja ckson

, Acting Director

U.S. EPA Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach

Diane Austin

, Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

Board Member s

12: 3 0

– 12: 4 0 Overview of Agenda

Diane Austin

, Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

12: 40

– 1:15 Defining Ecological Restoration

Greg Eckert, National Park Service

Keith Pezzoli, University of California, San Diego

Kevin Bixby, Southwest Environmental Center

1:15

– 2:00 Discussion of Key Issues

2:00

– 2:30 Discussion on Advice Letter and R eport

2: 3 0

– 3: 4 0 Distribution of Work

3 : 4 0

– 3: 50 Other issues

Distribution of GNEB reports

Translation of 15 th Report

3 : 5 0

– 4:00 Public Comments

4 :00 Adjourn
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 12, 2018

No. 04-17-00317-CV

Lloyd Hurt KELLNER, Trent C. Kellner, Linda Cunningham, Independent Administrator of 

The Estate of William Smith Nelson, Jr., Billie Alleen Kuhnel, Michael James Dworaczyk, 

Evelyn Hartman, Katherine Zaiontz, Otto Leo Henke, Jr., Patricia Ann Henke et al,

Appellants

v.

XTO ENERGY, INC., Newfield Exploration Company, Imperial Oil Company, Momentum Oil 

& Gas, LLC and Modelo Energy, LLC,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-09-0864-CVA

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This appeal was initially abated on February 22, 2018, to allow the parties time to obtain 

approval of a settlement agreement from the probate court. On March 21, 2018, we issued an 

order informing the parties that this appeal would remain abated and directing the appellees to 

advise this Court, in writing, of the status of the probate court’s review of the settlement 

agreement on or before May 2, 2018.

On May 2, 2018, the appellees filed a letter informing this Court that the probate court 

signed an order granting a motion to approve a settlement agreement on April 21, 2018. The 

appellees said they anticipated that a request for an agreed dismissal of this appeal would follow 

and they requested the continued abatement of this appeal. On May 3, 2018, the appellants filed 

a letter informing this court that they agreed to the continued abatement of this appeal. Although 

we did not issue an new abatement order in response to the parties’ letters, we have allowed this 

appeal to remain abated.

As of the date of this order, a request for an agreed dismissal of this appeal has not been 

filed. We, therefore, ORDER the appellees to explain, in writing, on or before July 12, 2018, 

why the abatement of this appeal should remain in effect. This Court will entertain a motion for 

an agreed dismissal of this appeal in lieu of an explanation from the appellees.
_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of June, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
June 7, 2005

24843

#### State v. Tokunaga

Dismissed
May 16, 2006

25070

#### Caneda v. Okuyama

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Jacob Collamer Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Preston Powers

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1881

Location
      
Hall of Columns

This statue of Jacob Collamer was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Vermont in 1881.

Jacob Collamer was born on January 8, 1791, in Troy, New York. He graduated from the University of Vermont, read law, was admitted to the bar in 1813, and became partner to Judge James Barrett. He served four terms in the Vermont House of Representatives and from 1833 until 1842 was assistant judge of the Supreme Court of Vermont. Elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1842, he advocated the annexation of Texas, supported the Mexican War and the tariff, and received national recognition for his "Wools and Woolens" speech.

Collamer served as postmaster general under President Zachary Taylor. He became a circuit court judge in Vermont from 1850 to 1854. A conservative anti-slavery Republican, he was elected to the Senate in 1855. Throughout his career in Congress, he concentrated on land and tariff issues. He defended his position even when in the minority, as exemplified in his vigorous minority report as a member of the Committee on Territories, chaired by Stephen Douglas. He was one of two senators who refused to vote for the Crittenden Amendment, which proposed resubmitting the Kansas Constitution to popular vote. He opposed the Reconstruction Plan of President Lincoln, advocating congressional control instead. He had received the presidential nomination from Vermont in 1860 but withdrew after the first ballot. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### In the Matter of John V. Irwin et al., Petitioners, for leave for said John V. Irwin to resign as Trustee of Trust between Edith S. Fabbri and Bank of New York and Trust Company.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

June 16, 1959.

*Hawkins, Delafield & Wood (Charles L. Kades*and *Clarence Fried*of counsel), for petitioners and Dave H. Morris, Jr., respondent.

*Emmet, Marvin é Martin (Richard S. Emmet*and *John L. Merrill*of counsel), for Bank of New York and Trust Company, individually and as trustee, respondent,

*495
      *David A. Prager,*as guardian ad litem for infants, respondents.

Samuel M. Gold, J.

This motion is granted to the extent of permitting petitioner Irwin to resign and he discharged of his duties, responsibilities and obligations under the trust indenture. To the extent that petitioner Teresa Fabbri McMurtry seeks (1) appointment in the place and stead of Irwin, and (2) a declaration as to her rights, duties and obligations as successor to Irwin, the motion is denied.

The powers of Irwin, to which McMurtry seeks to succeed, consist only of the right, together with Dave H. Morris, Jr.

(1) to request the trustee to sell or exchange the securities comprising the original corpus, and, with the trustee, to determine the investments or reinvestments to be made by the trustee, and

(2) to terminate the trust, in whole or in part, which power McMurtry would not have in view of her disqualification under section 141 of the Real Property Law.

McMurtry, as life tenant of the trust, possesses an interest adverse to that of the remaindermen and should not be permitted to succeed Irwin and thus participate in decisions relating to the investment of the corpus. McMurtry seeks appointment as successor to Irwin only on condition that she be held ineligible to participate in the exercise of the other power, viz., to terminate the trust. In these circumstances, a proper case for McMurtry’s appointment is not made out.

Although the indenture makes provision for the filling of a vacancy caused by the death of Irwin, it contains no provision for the filling of a vacancy caused by his resignation. The indenture clearly contemplates that the vacancy should be filled. The absence of a provision covering the contingency of Irwin’s resignation entitles the court to appoint a successor. In view of the fact that the successor would have the right, with Morris, to terminate the trust at any time, a proper exercise of the court’s discretion would seem to require it to appoint as successor a person jointly selected by the trustee and the life tenant, that being the manner in which a successor was to be appointed in the event of Irwin’s death.

The motion is granted to the extent of permitting Irwin to resign and be discharged, and to the further extent of appointing as his successor a person jointly selected by the trustee and the life tenant. If they cannot agree on a person to be appointed, the court will name a successor of its own choosing. In other respects the motion is denied.

Settle order.