alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3

LOGO

Lee P. Brennan

Vice
President

Mid-Corporation Banking Credit

August 29,
2006

CDI Corp.

1717 Arch Street, 35th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Attention: Mark Kerschner

Dear Mark:

This letter supersedes and replaces our advice of line of credit
letter dated June 21, 2006.

We are pleased to advise you that based upon your annual financial statements for the fiscal year 2005, and your filings
of interim information contained in your 10-Q dated as of June 30, 2006 JPMorgan Chase Bank (the Bank) has approved your request for a line of credit in the aggregate amount of $35,000,000.00. Our officers may, at their discretion,
make short term loans to CDI Corporation, on such terms as are mutually agreed upon between us from time to time.

Borrowings under this line are intended
to be used to meet your normal short term capital needs and will bear interest at such a rate as shall be mutually agreed upon by each of us from time to time.

As this line is not a commitment, credit availability is, in addition, subject to your execution and delivery of such documentation as the Bank deems appropriate and the receipt and continuing satisfaction with current financial information
(including without limitation audited annual and unaudited quarterly financial statements, promptly prepared and received), which information will be furnished to the Bank as it may from time to time reasonably request, and continuing satisfaction
with your financial condition, business affairs and prospects. This line expires on November 30, 2006.

We are pleased to be of service and trust you
will call upon us to assist in any of your banking requirements.



|                  
|------------------
|Very truly yours, 
|                  
|/s/ Lee P. Brennan



---

August 29, 2006

ENDORSEMENT NO. 4

The Promissory Note dated November 16, 2004 (the Note) of
CDI CORP.(the Borrower) as amended by Endorsement 1 and Endorsement 2 to which this Endorsement No. 3 is attached and evidencing a $35,000,000 uncommitted line of credit facility (Line of Credit) extended by
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,formerly JPMorganChase Bank (the Bank) to the Borrower is hereby amended by:



| | 1. | deleting August 31, 2006 in the first paragraph of the Note and substituting therefore November 30, 2006 as the amended Maturity Date of the Note and
expiration date for the Line of Credit.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



CDI CORP.By:

/s/ Mark A. KerschnerTitle:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.By:

/s/ Lee P. BrennanVice President
Exhibit 32.6

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF

CENTRAL ILLINOIS LIGHT COMPANY

(required by Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 of Central Illinois Light Company (the Registrant) as
filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), each undersigned officer of the Registrant does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 2, 2009



/s/    Scott A. CiselScott A. Cisel Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)/s/    Warner L. BaxterWarner L. Baxter Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00659

- CV

WILLIAM BRADLEY YATE S

v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

On Appeal from the 36th District Court of Live Oak County , Texas Trial Cause No. L

- 14

- 0114

- CV

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, hav ing considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for ob servance. March 5, 2015
#### CRANE CO., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRANE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING CO., a corporation, Frank J. Crane, Jr., Thomas Crane, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15256.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 4, 1963.

Truman A. Herron, Cincinnati, Ohio, Wood, Herron & Evans, Cincinnati, Ohio, Byron, Hume, Groen & Clement, Chicago, 111., of counsel, for appellant.

William J. Rielly, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees.

Before WEICK and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and DARR, Senior District Judge.

ORDER

The District Court, following the modification of its judgment by this Court in the previous appeal reported in 299 F. 2d 577, entered an order upon the remand which provided:

> “It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the modifications contained in the opinion and judgment entry of the United States Court of Appeals are hereby adopted and made a part of the original judgment entry in this case.”

The modification made by this Court in the previous appeal was to adopt and make a part of our order the agreement of the defendant set forth in Finding No. 9. The order entered by the District Court on remand as above set forth clearly has the effect of adopting and making the defendant’s agreement as set forth in Finding No. 9 a part of the judgment which means that defendant is ordered to perform its provisions. This constituted a full compliance with our mandate which the District Court was without power to change. Stiller v. Squeez-A-Purse Corporation, 296 F.2d 504 (C.A.6).

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment entered by the District Court upon the remand be and it hereby is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997             JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996             AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997             JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,952                  14,214
<SECURITIES>                                       100                   4,265
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,423                  28,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,552                   1,531
<INVENTORY>                                      3,238                     806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,667                  63,172
<PP&E>                                         108,477                  93,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,574                  19,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,008                 158,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,422                  19,931
<BONDS>                                         67,624                  78,937
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           420                     418
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,874                  49,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,008                 158,025
<SALES>                                         72,662                  65,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,662                  65,678
<CGS>                                           23,129                  21,438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,509                  43,605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   186                     185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    42                     208
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,014                   2,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,953                  19,791
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,254                   8,262
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,699                  11,529
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,699                  11,529
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72                     .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72                     .61
        

</TABLE>
July 11, 2008

28695

#### Deparini v. State

Affirmed
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Brian E. Dearing, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of ARI Network Services, Inc.,certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated: December 15, 2006   /s/ Brian E. Dearing     Brian E. Dearing  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>

       
<S>                             <C>                    <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                        6-MOS          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997    DEC-31-1997    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1997    JUN-30-1997    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                  140,606,369     51,141,586     55,997,374
<SECURITIES>                                      0              0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                            15,657,889     10,512,562     10,390,628
<ALLOWANCES>                             (1,234,224)    (1,234,144)    (1,252,338)
<INVENTORY>                                       0              0              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        158,234,767     62,605,872     67,577,386
<PP&E>                                    4,894,109     10,528,932      9,974,841
<DEPRECIATION>                             (731,598)      (571,538)      (407,286)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          210,268,343    108,201,513    110,703,374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    14,108,370     10,537,275     10,850,771
<BONDS>                                 100,000,000      6,619,840      8,911,221
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0              0              0
<PREFERRED>                                 233,000        233,000        249,000
<COMMON>                                    858,921        856,587        854,954
<OTHER-SE>                               93,244,816     89,206,305     87,744,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            210,268,343    108,201,513    110,703,374
<SALES>                                  48,840,578     28,021,997     13,091,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         48,840,578     28,021,997     13,091,518
<CGS>                                             0              0              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            31,369,268     17,482,675      8,058,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         12,191,139      7,975,628      4,158,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            252,711        173,841         91,339
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        1,428,600        521,243        275,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           6,682,224      3,436,161      1,372,299
<INCOME-TAX>                              2,686,254      1,381,146        551,474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       3,978,095      2,042,964        814,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0              0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0              0              0
<CHANGES>                                         0              0              0
<NET-INCOME>                              3,978,095      2,042,964        814,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.23           0.12           0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.23           0.12           0.05
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
                              One Champion Plaza
                              Stamford, CT  06921


                                                           March 27, 1998


Champion International Corporation
One Champion Plaza
Stamford, CT  06921

Dear Sirs:

     As Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Champion International
Corporation (the "Company"), I advise you as follows in connection with legal
and administrative claims and proceedings which are pending or known to be
threatened against the Company.

     I call your attention to the fact that, as Senior Vice President and
General Counsel of the Company, I have general supervision of the Company's
legal affairs. In such capacity, I have reviewed litigation and claims
threatened or asserted involving the Company and have consulted with outside
legal counsel with respect thereto where I have deemed it appropriate.

     There are currently no material legal or administrative claims or
proceedings pending or known to be threatened against the Company.

     I hereby consent to the reference to this opinion in the Company's Annual
Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, and in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997
(the "Form 10-K"), and to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Form
10-K.
 
                                         Very truly yours,    
                                                              
                                                              
                                                              
                                         /s/ Stephen B. Brown 
                                         Senior Vice President
                                         and General Counsel   
SBB/col
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*James R. Lewis, Defendant.

Children’s Court of New York, Wayne County,

May 27, 1957.

*Charles E. Ennis*for plaintiff.

*Strobridge d Biddle (Thomas W. Biddle*of counsel), for defendant.

James D. Hurley, J.

Complainant, an unmarried woman, was delivered of a baby boy on or about the 30th day of October, 1956.

She has brought this proceeding against the defendant, alleging that he is the father of said child, and requesting that he be required to provide for and support said child pursuant to the provisions of the Domestic Relations Law.

Testimony shows to the entire satisfaction of the court that the complainant has sustained the burden of proof and that the defendant is the father of said child.

Prior to the bringing of this proceeding, I am satisfied that the defendant on one or more occasions was accused of being the father of the child and that he at no time flatly denied such accusations.

On the entire evidence, I feel that an order of filiation should be granted herein. *(Matter of. Saratoga County Comr. of Public Welfare*v. “ *Waters*”, 205 Misc. 1004.)

No testimony was taken upon the hearing as to the financial needs of the infant or the financial resources of the defendant. In view of this decision, a further hearing will be held at a term of this court at the Wayne County Surrogate’s Office on June 4, 1957, at 2 o’clock in the afternoon for the purpose of taking further testimony.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                   
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                                                 405
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          169
<ALLOWANCES>                                             5
<INVENTORY>                                            452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,186
<PP&E>                                                 772
<DEPRECIATION>                                         245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       4,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  223
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          2,845
<COMMON>                                             9,901
<OTHER-SE>                                           1,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         4,203
<SALES>                                              1,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,057
<CGS>                                                  701
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,309)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,309)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 167 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the committees 

of jurisdiction in the House of Representatives should craft replacement 

language for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that includes the amendments made to the Black Lung Benefits Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2015 

Mr. JENKINS of West Virginia (for himself, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. MOONEY of 

West Virginia, Mr. GRIFFITH, and Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the committees of jurisdiction in the House of Representatives should craft replacement language for the Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act that includes the 

amendments made to the Black Lung Benefits Act. 

Whereas men and women who spend their lives mining coal 

deserve the black lung benefits afforded them through 

the Black Lung Benefits Act; 

Whereas these critical benefits are important for thousands 

of men and women across the United States; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 167 IH 

Whereas since 1969, black lung benefits have been guaranteed by the Federal Government and have provided assistance for miners and their widows; 

Whereas in 1981, the Black Lung Benefits Act was amended 

tightening eligibility requirements and eliminating two 

provisions regarding coal miners’ and survivors’ entitlement benefits; 

Whereas the Black Lung Benefits Act was restored and 

amended into the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 

Act, providing equity for certain eligible survivors; 

Whereas the House of Representatives passed a repeal of the 

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on February 

3, 2015, instructing committees of jurisdiction to craft 

replacement language; and 

Whereas current black lung benefits should not be reduced 

but should be preserved and protected: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the committees of jurisdiction in the 

3 House of Representatives should craft replacement lan4 guage for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

5 that includes the amendments that restored the Black 

6 Lung Benefits Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
154 P.3d 432

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

March 20, 2007

26848

#### State v. Allison

Affirmed
January 9, 2002

23669

#### State v. Shinyama

Vacated and Remanded