alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2441

MARY JO WILHELMJ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FIRST BANK,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

NORWEST BANK NEBRASKA, N.A.,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-99-195-A)

Submitted: March 23, 2001 Decided: April 24, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Jo Wilhelmj, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Bledsoe, Alexandria,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mary Jo Wilhelmj appeals the district court’s order denying

her motion to reinstate her cases against Norwest Bank and US Bank

(formerly First Bank). In addition to referencing her substantive

claims against these institutions, Wilhelmj, in her docketing

statement and informal brief, raises new claims relating to a Washington Post newspaper article and the existence of certain high

technology military weaponry.

To the extent that Wilhelmj is challenging the district

court’s order denying her motion to reinstate, we have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Wilhelmj v. First Bank, No. CA-99-195-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 6,

2000). To the extent that she is raising new claims, such claims

may not be raised for the first time in this court. Accordingly,

we express no opinion as to these new assertions. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.bI, Marc N. Teal, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund LimitedPartnership;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  July 16, 2007 /s/ Marc N. Teal   Marc N. Teal,    Principal Financial Officer
#### Parks v. Loo

23352

02/28/2003

Affirmed
26460

#### State v. Zulueta

Affirmed
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Leopold Spingarn, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

March 11, 1959.

*Lawrence I. Gerber*for Howard Spingarn and another, as executors, petitioners.

*Herbert A. Mossier*for Claire Spingarn and another, respondents.

*Julian 8. Bush*for Celia Spingarn, respondent.

*Roy M. Cohn,*as special guardian for James L. Spingarn and others, infants, respondent.

*Maclay, Morgan $ Williams (G. Bickerman Williams*of counsel), for Pauline B. Paglin and others, respondents.

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The first article of the codicil to the testator’s will bequeathed to the legatee therein named the sum of $20,000 “ in lieu of the gratuity which would otherwise be payable by reason of my membership in the New York Stock Exchange ”. At the date of the testator’s death the legatee was his wife and, as such, was paid a sum of $20,000 by the stock exchange.

Other than the legacy in the codicil, the will made no provision for the widow and she has elected, pursuant to section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law to take against the provisions of the will. If the legacy is effective, the widow will receive payment thereof and the difference between the amount of her legacy and her intestate share while if the legacy is ineffective, she will receive the identical aggregate amount as her intestate share. The question raised as to effectiveness of the legacy is of consequence only to determine whether she is entitled to interest on $20,000 as a legatee or as an electing spouse.

The provision for the legatee is quite analogous to a bequest in lieu of dower or other statutory benefit beyond the control of a testator and the intention expressed was that the legatee could not claim both the legacy and the gratuity (Matter *of Rosenthal,*
      *431141 Misc. 404; *Matter of Westerbeke,*143 Misc. 221, affd. 236 App. Div. 856, affd. 262 N. Y. 466; *Hatch*v. *Bassett,*52 N. Y. 359). Having accepted the gratuity, the widow is not entitled to the legacy.

The gratuity was no part of the testator’s estate and was not his to bequeath but had he this disposition of the fund, it would not be considered in determining the extent of the property bequeathed to the widow by the will *(Matter of Litt,*73 N. Y. S. 2d 368; *Matter of Weil,*73 N. Y. S. 2d 370). The full intestate share of the widow is to be computed upon the basis that the will conferred no benefit to her.

The proposed decree is to be resubmitted with the computation of the elective share made in accordance with this opinion. A computation of the contributions required of the legatees to comprise the elective share and a computation of the average rate of return on principal is to be submitted to determine the widow’s participation in income earned during the estate administration. The executors will be permitted to hold a reserve for tax contingencies.

Proceed accordingly.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Wangari Maathai Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Golden Raintree

Year
    2005

Location
      
Capitol Square, S.W.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text of the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Commemorative Tree

*Koelreuteria paniculata*
(Golden Raintree)

To Honor Nobel Peace Laureate
Wangari Maathai of Kenya

Sponsored by
Rep. Barbara Lee

Planted on May 11, 2005

Honoree Details

With advanced degrees in biology, Wangari Maathai was both an environmentalist and a political activist. In 1977, she led a national movement to reforest Kenya. Her organization is credited with planting about 30 million trees and  making it a project for as many as 30,000 underemployed women.

Tree Details

ImageThe tree's most notable ornamental characteristic is the showy yellow flowers in early summer.
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    The Wangari Maathai tree on U.S. Capitol Grounds in spring.

The Wangari Maathai tree on U.S. Capitol Grounds in spring.
    The Wangari Maathai tree on U.S. Capitol Grounds in summer.

The Wangari Maathai tree on U.S. Capitol Grounds in summer.
    The Wangari Maathai tree on U.S. Capitol Grounds in winter.

The Wangari Maathai tree on U.S. Capitol Grounds in winter.

      Previous Image
        Next Image

          The Wangari Maathai tree on U.S. Capitol Grounds in spring.
      The Wangari Maathai tree on U.S. Capitol Grounds in summer.
      The Wangari Maathai tree on U.S. Capitol Grounds in winter. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**Exhibit 32.2**

Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer 

I, Jerrold J. Pellizzon, Chief Financial Officer of Ceradyne, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

(1)    the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and 

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated:  February 26, 2007
Exhibit 99.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFG Investment Trust A Liquidating Trust (the Trust) , on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer of the Managers, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 
 /s/ Gary D. Engle
 Gary D. Engle
 President of Equis Corporation,
 the general partner of EFG, and
 the President and Director of
 AFG ASIT Corporation
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 May 12, 2003
14.5 Polar Sea Ice Extent and Northern Lat itudes Temperature, 1880-2013 100 

14 80 

13.5 

60 

13 

40 

12.5 

20 

12 

A.V 0 

11.5 

-20 

11 

10.5 ~0 

10 -60 

~~~0 ~~~h ~~~~ ~~~h ^°'00 ~°'~h ~°'~0 ^°,~h ~°,,~0 ~°'ryh ►.~~~ ~°'~h ~°'~0 ~°'~h ^°'~0 ^~

b

h +`°,~0 ~°'~h '°',~0 ,.°',~h t.~~0 ►.°j~h ,.°'~~ +`°'~h ryo0 `yo0h `yo~~ ~,O~h 

Sources: For temperature--ftp://sidads.colorado.edu/DATASETS/NOAA/G02135/ For sea ice after 1978--ftp://sidads.colorado.edu/DATASETS/NOAA/G02135/ 

For sea ice before 1979--http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/SEAICE/timeseries.1870-2008 (National Snow and Ice Data center) 

Annual data and 10-year moving averages; data mainly fron NOAA--see footnote 

Sea Ice Extent, million squ e kilometers (left axis 1~ 

}, 

 r ~ r 

~ ~ 

Temperature, deviation from 1951-1980 average, 

, 

t 

~ 

' 

: 

` 

l ~ 

I I ~
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of infoUSA Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that to thebest of my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        Date: November 9, 2005 /s/ *Vinod Gupta*   Vinod Gupta,   Chief Executive Officer
Rev 0 (9/08)

Comments in Response to 

“Final rule; request for comments”

Docket: FAA-2012-1104- Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-073-AD

Comments have been received in response to: “Final rule; request for comments,”

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted.

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal.

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: The 

Boeing Company

(Please check one)

 These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD.

 These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

FAA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)

______Kenneth W. Frey_____ 9 January 2013__

Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 340 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 340

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 25, 2015.
    Resolved, That the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1735) entitled ``An 
Act to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2016 for military activities of 
the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities 
of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such 
fiscal year, and for other purposes.'', in the opinion of this House, 
contravenes the first clause of the seventh section of the first article of the 
Constitution of the United States and is an infringement of the privileges of 
this House and that such bill, with the Senate amendment thereto, shall be 
respectfully returned to the Senate with a message communicating this 
resolution.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Fw: Revised preamble and regulatory text

Anna Wood to: Pam Long 02/23/2012 04:55 PM

Cc: Juan Santiago

From: Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Pam Long/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

History: This message has been forwarded.

FYI

_______________________________

Anna Marie Wood

Director, Air Quality Policy Division

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

AQPD (C504-01)

109 T.W. Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541- 3604

Fax: (919) 541- 4028

----- Forwarded by Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/23/2012 04:54 PM -----

From: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, MichaelS Brooks/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lynn 

Hutchinson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kristi 

Smith/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul Balserak/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/23/2012 04:50 PM

Subject: Revised preamble and regulatory text

Christine,

Per our conversation, please find attached the revisions we have made in response to the interagency 

comments. All changes have been "tracked" and explained in margin "bubble" comments for ease of 

review.

We are available to discuss any questions the reviewers may have. Please don't hesitate to call if we can 

be of assistance.

Thanks!

Juan E. Santiago

Revised Step 3 Draft - OMB comment response 2-23-12.docx

Synthetic Minor Reg Text 2-23-12 Revisions.docx
#### Hanawahine v. County of Hawai'i

18430

10/28/96

Affirmed in part, Vacated in part and Remanded
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82502-82506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25928]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more 
applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and 
U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions 
with them.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for effective date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Bradley T. Smith, Director, 
tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-
622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; 
Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or 
Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-
622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Action(s)

    On November 16, 2023, OFAC determined that the property and 
interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following 
persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed 
below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[[Page 82503]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24NO23.038


[[Page 82504]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24NO23.039


[[Page 82505]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24NO23.040


[[Page 82506]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24NO23.041


    Dated: November 16, 2023.
Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2023-25928 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply629Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Donald Sayre (... (not verified)PermalinkOctober 22, 2019 - 3:48pmEntertaining, informative, insightful._x000D_ _x000D_ Thank you.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe