alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C ESAR C R UZ-M ENDEZ, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-72644 Age n c y No. A092-514-431 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

June 12, 2014 ** B e fore : M c KEOW

N , WA RDLAW , a

nd M . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. C e sa r C ruz -M e nde z , a

native and c itiz e n of M e xic o , pe t itions for re v ie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism i ssing his a p p e a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng his a pplic a t ion for de fe rra l of re m ova l unde r the C onve ntion Aga inst Torture(“ C AT” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . 

# FIL ED JUN 16 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).§ 1252. W e re vie wfor substa ntia l e vide n c e fa c tua l findings. De lgado v . Holde r , 563 F.3d 863, 874 (9th C ir. 2009). W e grant the pe t ition for re vie w, a n d re m and. In de ny ing C ruz -M e nde z ’ s C AT c la im , the B IA e rre d in fa iling to disc uss the c ountry

c o nditions e v ide nc e in the re c ord. Se e Aguilar-Ramos v
. Holde r , 594 F.3d 701, 705 &n.6 (9th C ir. 2010) (“ The gove rnm e nt doe s not dispute tha t the B IA fa ile d to m e ntion theC ountry R e port in its de c ision.” ). Thus, we grant the pe tition for re vie w a

nd re m and for the B IA to do so in the first insta nc e . Se e IN

S v
. Ve ntura , 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (pe r c uriam ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WG RANT E D; RE M ANDE D .
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply11796Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Marsha Delois Gantt (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 24, 2022 - 8:25amCongratulations to you!  What a great story and encouragement for me!! It has inspired me to stop procrastinating and get started on my journey to my longtime passion!!!! Thank you for sharing!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, inc. 8-K


 


Exhibit
10.1


 


June
29, 2018


 


Via
Electronic Mail


 


Cleanspark,
Inc.


6365
Nancy Ridge Drive, Fl. 2


San
Diego, California 92121


Attention:
Zachary Bradford, President


 


Re:


Extension
of Termination Date


 


Dear
Mr. Bradford:


 


Reference
is made to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Cleanspark, Inc. (“Cleanspark”) and
Pioneer Custom Electric Products Corp. (“Pioneer”), dated as of May 2, 2018 (the “Purchase
Agreement”). All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the
Purchase Agreement.


By
execution hereof, Cleanspark hereby agrees to extend the Termination Date as set forth in Section 8.1(d) of the Purchase Agreement
from June 30, 2018 until October 15, 2018 (the “Extension”). During the Extension, all other terms and
conditions of the Purchase Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


Sections
9.4 – 9.14 of the Purchase Agreement shall apply to this Agreement mutatis mutandis.


If
you are in agreement with the foregoing, please so indicate by your countersignature below. 





	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	PIONEER CUSTOM ELECTRIC PRODUCTS
    CORP.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Nathan Mazurek	 
	 	Name:	Nathan Mazurek
	 	Title:	President









 


Agreed
and Accepted as of this 29th day of June, 2018


 





	CLEANSPARK, INC.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Zachary Bradford	 	 
	Name:	Zachary Bradford	 
	Title:	President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6245

CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION; VETERANS HOSPITAL; VETERANS 

ADMINISTRATION BENEFITS COORDINATOR, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:15-cv-00039-RDB) 

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Calvin Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Calvin Scott Wedington appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for 

lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our 

review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. 

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Wedington’s informal brief does 

not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, 

Wedington has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
26485

#### Ucko v. Robbins

Affirmed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JONATHAN BARRIS,

Appel l ee

v.

STROUD TOWNSHIP,

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 68 MAP 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6 th day of July , 2022

, th e briefing directives contained in the

Court’s June 6, 2022 order are hereby VACATED , and the parties are DIRECTED to

address the question presented under the standards announced in N.Y. Rifle & Pistol

Assoc., Inc. v. Bruen , ___ S.Ct. ___, 2022 WL 2251305 (June 23, 2022).

Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
EXHIBIT 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P (the "Fund");

1. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
3. The Fund's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and we have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Fund, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the Fund's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date (the "Evaluation Date") within 45 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report; and
3. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



1. The Fund's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Fund's auditors and the audit committee of the Fund's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



1. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Fund's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Fund's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Fund's internal controls; and



1. The Fund's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|Date:February20, 2004 | _/s/ John P. Manning
|--------------------- | --------------------
|                      | John P. Manning     
|                      | Director, President 
|                      | (Principal Executive
|                      | Officer), C&M       
|                      | Management Inc.;    
|                      |
#### State v. Batiste

16812

9/10/96

Reversed, Vacated and Remanded
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

CDI Corp.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-112088, No. 333-123886 and No. 333-123888) and the registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-112752) of CDI Corp. of our reports dated March 6, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CDICorp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and the relatedfinancial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of CDI Corp. 

 

Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards number 123 (R), “Share Based Payment,” and the related interpretations as of January 1,2006.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Gregory IX, Relief Portrait
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Thomas Hudson Jones

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1950

Location
      
House Chamber

Gregory IX (c. 1147-1241) Medieval pope. Author of a compilation of decretals (i.e., authoritative decisions) on canon law; during a critical period he was instrumental in maintaining the remnants of Roman law.

The 23 marble relief portraits over the gallery doors of the House Chamber in the U.S. Capitol depict historical figures noted for their work in establishing the principles that underlie American law. They were installed when the chamber was remodeled in 1949-1950. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Order filed April 21, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00200-CV

____________

KEVIN COLE, YOLANDA FELDER AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, 

Appellants

V.

AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT PROPERTIES ONE LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1056492

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed March 4, 2015. To date, the filing 

fee of $195.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established 

indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the 

following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $195.00 to the 

clerk of this court on or before May 6, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant 
fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: 

RESCISSION OF RULE 4003, 

AMENDMENT OF RULE 

4008 AND AMENDMENT OF THE 

COMMENTS TO RULE 4006 AND 4007 

OF THE RULES OF JUDICIAL 

ADMINISTRATION

 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 528

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 12

th day of December, 2019, the proposal having been published 

for public comment at 49 Pa.B. 4002 (August 3, 2019), it is Ordered pursuant to Article V, 

Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rule 4003 of the Pennsylvania Rules 

of Judicial Administration is hereby rescinded, and Rule 4008 and the comments to Rule 

4006 and Rule 4007 are amended in the attached form.

This Order shall be effective immediately and shall be processed in accordance 

with Rule 103(b) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial Administration.

Justice Dougherty dissents from the dissolution of the Committee on Court 

Reporting and Transcripts.

 

Additions are in bold and underlined.

Deletions are in bold and bracketed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDDIE D. KNIGHT,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

LEA, Captain; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-16909

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00751-FCDCMK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Frank C. Damrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 10, 2011** 

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Eddie D. Knight, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his safety. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We

FILED

JAN 24 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-16909

affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment to defendants Lea,

Oftiedahl, Gower, and Hale, because Knight failed to raise a genuine issue of

material fact as to whether these defendants disregarded an excessive risk to his

safety or responded unreasonably to such risk. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S.

825, 837, 844-45 (1994) (a prison official is not liable for deliberate indifference

unless he knew of and disregarded an excessive risk to the inmate’s safety; and,

even if the official knew of such risk, he is not liable if he “responded reasonably

to the risk, even if the harm ultimately was not averted”).

We do not address Knight’s claims against defendants Wong, Lyons, and

Simmerson, because Knight did not specifically and distinctly argue these claims

on appeal. See Entm’t Research Grp., Inc. v. Genesis Creative Grp., Inc., 122 F.3d

1211, 1217 (9th Cir. 1997) (“We review only issues which are argued specifically

and distinctly in a party’s opening brief. We will not manufacture arguments for

an appellant, and a bare assertion does not preserve a claim . . . .” (citation

omitted)).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Knight’s motions to

extend the discovery deadline and for a continuance under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 56(f). See Tatum v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 441 F.3d 1090, 1100
3 09-16909

(9th Cir. 2006) (standard of review and Rule 56(f) requirements); Zivkovic v. S.

Cal. Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087-88 (9th Cir. 2002) (the district court did not

abuse its discretion by denying a request to extend the discovery deadline because

the moving party failed to show “good cause” to modify the pretrial scheduling

order).

We are unpersuaded by Knight’s remaining contentions, including those

concerning amendment of the complaint.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule15d-14(b)Of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DynTek, Inc.,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer, herebycertifies pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that based on my knowledge:

(1)           the Report of the Company filed today pursuant toSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| Dated: May 21, 2007 | /s/ Mark E. Ashdown     |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                | Mark E. Ashdown         |   |
|                | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CHATTEM,
INC.'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                             508
<SECURITIES>                                     4,349
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600
<INVENTORY>                                     14,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,872
<PP&E>                                          28,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,452
<BONDS>                                        142,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,945
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,744
<SALES>                                        143,236
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,236
<CGS>                                           38,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,834
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,249
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,993
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,255
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,370)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          28,353
<SECURITIES>                                     5,041
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,925
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,186)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,169
<PP&E>                                          20,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,977)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,433
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,033
<SALES>                                          7,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,965
<CGS>                                              984
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   241
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (350)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,272)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        96
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,368)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,368)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)
        

</TABLE>