alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T A N C E K A R A M O Y W E N A S e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 71776 A ge nc yN os . A 095- 302- 046

A 095- 302- 047 A 095- 302- 048 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y12, 2011 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N , an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A nce K ar am oy W enas and h erfam i l y, nat i ves and ci t i ze ns of Indo nesi a, p e titio n f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o a r do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ o r d e rd is m is s in g th e ir ap p e a l f r o m a n i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s d e c i s i o n d e n y i n g th e i rap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l, an dr e lie f

u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e ( “C A T ” ) .



# FI LED JU L 19 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 71776 2 W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence f a c tu a l f in d in g s , Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 453 F . 3d 1182, 1184- 85 ( 9th C i r . 2006) , a nd we d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatpet i t i on er s have e st abl i shed e x tr a o r d in a ryc ir c u m s ta n c e s to e x c u s e th e iru n tim e lya s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 1 5 8 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( D ) ; T oj -Cul pa tan v. H

older , 61 2 F . 3d 10 88 , 10 91 (9th C i r. 2 0 1 0 ) (p er cu ri am ). A cco rd i n g l y, p et i t i o n ers’ asyl u m cl ai m fai l s. S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s f i ndi ng tha tthe ha r a s s m e nt W e na s a nd he rf

a m i l ye xpe r i e nc e d, a nd the be a t i ng of he rs on, di d notr i s e t o the le v e l o f p e r s e c u tio n . See Na g o u lko v . I NS , 3 3 3 F .3 d1 0 1 2 , 1 0 1 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . T he re cord al so do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatpet i t i on er s have acl ear p r o b ab ilityo f

f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n . See Fakhry v . Mukasey , 524 F . 3d 1057, 1065- 66 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). F i nal l y, subst ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s deni alof C A T re l i ef be c aus e pe t i t i one r s f

a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h i ti s m or e l i ke l ytha n nottha tthe yw i l l be to rtu r e dif

r e tu rn e dto I n d o n e s ia . See W akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1049, 1067- 68 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply589Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Betty Futrell ... (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 27, 2018 - 3:22pmRev. Billy Graham, the beloved pastor of the world, is now in his heavenly home and was welcomed by his Lord and Savor Jesus Christ.  It is only fitting that he has received such an honor to lie in state in the US Capital Rotunda.  My prayers are with his family and all Americans who loved him.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pamrapo Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth D. Walter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kenneth D. WalterKenneth D. WalterChief Financial Officer


March 17, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Fund's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



|Date:           |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|August 16, 2010 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc. N. Teal              
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
154 P.3d 431

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

February 23, 2007

27060

#### Douglas v. State

Affirmed
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6785** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. RAOUL LAFOND, a/k/a Chris Lafond, a/k/a Jim, a/k/a Jamaican Jim, a/k/a Derrick Burch, a/k/a Fletcher Busbee, a/k/a Ronald Elie, a/k/a Ronald Ely , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. William L. Osteen, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 6:96

- cr - 00212

- WO

- 1; 1:12

- cv - 01200

- WO

- JEP )

Submitted : August 21 , 2014 Decided: August 26, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Raoul Lafond, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Raoul Lafond seeks to appeal from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendations a nd (1) denying Lafond’s motions for default judgment and motion to dismiss, and (2) construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as

a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion and dismissing it as successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or ju dge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court de nies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Mil ler

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denia l of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lafond has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.3 Additionally, we deny Lafond’s motion s for entry of default and for release on bail pending appeal
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 173 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 173

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 26, 2015.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2) to amend title XVIII of the Social 
Security Act to repeal the Medicare sustainable growth rate and strengthen 
Medicare access by improving physician payments and making other improvements, 
to reauthorize the Children's Health Insurance Program, and for other purposes. 
All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The amendment 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution 
shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are 
waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided among and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy 
and Commerce and the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways 
and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  On any legislative day during the period from March 27, 2015, 
through April 10, 2015--
     (a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day shall be considered 
as approved; and
    (b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at a date 
and time, within the limits of clause 4, section 5, article I of the 
Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment.
    Sec. 3.  The Speaker may appoint Members to perform the duties of the Chair 
for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as 
though under clause 8(a) of rule I.
    Sec. 4.  Each day during the period addressed by section 2 of this 
resolution shall not constitute a calendar day for purposes of section 7 of the 
War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1546).
    Sec. 5.  The Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on Ways and 
Means each may, at any time before 5 p.m. on April 6, 2015, file reports to 
accompany measures.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 14, 2004 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ S. Patric PlumleyS. Patric PlumleyChief Financial OfficerJuly 23, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Woodall v. Sacharov

26591

09/29/2005

Affirmed
27471

#### State v. Tenn

Affirmed
Exhibit
32.11
 
 
 SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION
 OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
 CENTRAL
ILLINOIS LIGHT COMPANY
 (required
by Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)
 
 
 In
connection with the report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004 of Central Illinois Light Company (the “Company”) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-K"), I, Gary L. Rainwater, chief executive officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:
March 9, 2005
  ****/s/ Gary L.
    RainwaterGary L. RainwaterChairman andChief Executive
      Officer(Principal Executive
Officer)
#### John E. Saglett, Plaintiff, *v.*Werner Spitz Construction Co., Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Monroe County,

March 19, 1971.

*Winchell, Connors £ Corcoran (Paul K. Lange*of counsel), for plaintiff. *Culley, Maries, Corbett, Tanenbaum, Riefstech £ Potter (William M. Weegare*of counsel), for defendant.

Emmett J. Schnepp, J.

Plaintiff sues for damages for personal injuries sustained by the alleged negligence of the defendant. Prior to the commencement of the action, a signed state*884ment was obtained by plaintiff’s attorney from A. David Merkle, an employee of the defendant at the time of the accident, whose employment status had been terminated at the time the statement was obtained. Defendant has made demand for a copy of such statement. Plaintiff has moved for a protective order claiming that the statement is not obtainable, as it constitutes an attorney’s work product, material prepared for litigation and, further, that it is not a statement of a party to the action.

A party has the right to obtain a copy of his own statement. (CPLR 3101, subd. [e].) A corporate party is entitled to obtain a copy of a statement made by its employee to its adversary, without proving special circumstances. *(Briggs*v. *Spencerport Road Plaza,*19 A D 2d 943; *Magee*v. *Faymour Development Co.,*32 A D 2d 811.) The court fails to see why, in this context, any distinction should be made between an employee and a former employee of a party, so long as the facts in the statement are based on information acquired during the course of the employment. Any privilege, which might otherwise exist, by reason of a claim that such statement is the work product of an attorney or material prepared for litigation (CPLR 3101, subds. [c], [d]) must give way to the superior right of a party to obtain a copy of his own statement.

Accordingly, the motion of the plaintiff for a protective order is denied, without costs.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
The Mayflower Compact, 1620
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

The Mayflower Compact, a document signed aboard the ship Mayflower in 1620, set forth principles of tolerance and liberty for the government of a new colony in the New World. Pilgrim leader William Brewster is shown signing the document; John Standish, the colony's military leader, stands at left.

**Left:**The Native American symbolizes the importance to the colonists of friendship with the people of the New World.

**Right:**A Pilgrim woman uses a spinning wheel in front of a typical house. During times of peace, such domestic scenes would have been common.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The central east-west corridor is referred to as the Great Experiment Hall because it chronicles in 16 murals the legislative milestones of three centuries, from the signing of the Mayflower Compact in 1629 to the enactment of women's suffrage in 1920. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Notarianni, Michele From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments:

Michele, Mason, Maeve [masonmr@dhec.sc.gov] Monday, August 12, 2013 2:30 PM Notarianni, Michele Benjamin, Lynorae; Brown, Robbie Re: Maeve: Data underlying Figures 7-10 in SC Regional Haze Progress Report SIP? Colorado IMPROVE Study_App G (glidepath)_2011.pdf; GlidePath_ VIST+ _B20_2002gt2a_ 2009g2a&2018g4a_unit=Deciview_12km_nia.xls; GlidePath_ VIST+ _W20_2002gt2a_ 2009g2a&2018g4a_unit=Deciview_12km_nia.xls; Email_ Source ofGlideslope.pdf

Thanks forthe call and email follow up. Ithinkthis is what you need. Figure 7 and 8 information/data is attached. The two excel documents (best and worst glideslopes) were shared among the VISTAS/SEMAP states. Ithink it was originally produced by Environ and updated by NC forthe purpose ofthe Periodic Updates. The excel documentswere originally downloaded from an ftp site run by NC
- see email. Figure 9 and 10 information/data is attached (page 178 and 179 specifically) and can also be found using the link on the footnote of page 37 ofthe periodic update. This footnote references the Colorado State University Study- specificallyAppendix G. Hope this answers your questions/provides you with what you need. Thanks! 

### Maeve S.R. Mason, Manager Regulation & 

### SIPManagement BureauofAir Quality, SCDHEC 2600

### Bull Street Columbia, SC. 29201 803.898.2230
OnMon, Aug 12,2013 at 12:37 PM, Notarianni, Michele <Notarianni.Michele@epa.gov>wrote:

# ~ Hello Maeve,

As a follow-up to myvoicemail to you today, to reiterate, I am looking for the data underlying Figures 7-10 on pages 38-41 ofSouth Carolina's final Regional Haze Progress Report SIP. Could you please help me locate the information in the submittal? Thanks, that would be a great help.

Michele

1
| (a)  | the      Form 10Q, Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 of the Company for the quarter ended      March 31, 2010 filed on May 4, 2010 with the Securities and Exchange      Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b)  | information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Richard J. Giromini                                |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Richard      J. Giromini                               |   |
|   | President      and Chief Executive Officer             |   |
|   | May      4, 2010                                       |   |
|   |                                                   |   |
|   | /s/ Mark J. Weber                                      |   |
|   | Mark      J. Weber                                     |   |
|   | Senior      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | May      4, 2010                                       |   |

----