Cite as 2022 Ark. 193

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CV-22-113

ROBINSON NURSING AND

REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC,

D/B/A ROBINSON NURSING AND 

REHABILITATION CENTER

APPELLANT

V.

ANDREW PHILLIPS, AS PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF 

DOROTHY PHILLIPS, AND ON BEHALF 

OF THE WRONGFUL DEATH 

BENEFICIARIES OF DOROTHY 

PHILLIPS; AND ON BEHALF OF 

THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS 

SIMILARLY SITUATED

APPELLEES

Opinion Delivered: November 3, 2022

APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. 60CV-14-4568]

HONORABLE TIMOTHY DAVIS FOX, 

JUDGE

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

JOHN DAN KEMP, Chief Justice

Appellant Robinson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC (Robinson), appeals from 

a Pulaski County Circuit Court order granting in part and denying in part its motion to enforce 

arbitration agreements and to compel class members with arbitration agreements to submit their 

claims to binding arbitration. For reversal, Robinson argues that law of the case controls, the 

arbitration agreements are valid, and the affirmative defenses pled by appellee Andrew Phillips 

fail. Phillips, as personal representative of the Estate of Dorothy Phillips, on behalf of the 

wrongful-death beneficiaries, and as class representative in this class-action suit, cross-appeals 
2

and asserts that the circuit court’s order redefines class membership and acts as a final 

disposition of the case. We remand to the circuit court with instructions. 

I. Facts

The facts in this case were set forth at length in Robinson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, 

LLC v. Phillips, 2017 Ark. 162, 519 S.W.3d 291 (Phillips I), and Robinson Nursing and Rehabilitation 

Center, LLC v. Phillips, 2019 Ark. 305, 586 S.W.3d 624 (Phillips II). In Phillips I, we affirmed the 

circuit court’s grant of class certification with respect to Phillips’s claims of breach of contract, a 

violation of the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and unjust enrichment, and we reversed 

with respect to Phillips’s negligence claim. Phillips I, 2017 Ark. 162, at 14–16, 519 S.W.3d at 

301–02. Robinson then sought to compel arbitration of the claims of its 544 residents identified 

in the class. We affirmed the circuit court’s denial of Robinson’s motions to compel arbitration 

of its arbitration agreements that contained deficiencies. Phillips II, 2019 Ark. 305, at 21, 586 

S.W.3d at 637. We also reversed and remanded with respect to those arbitration agreements not 

otherwise held to be invalid in Phillips II. Id., 586 S.W.3d at 637. 

Subsequently, Robinson moved to enforce arbitration agreements and to compel 197 

residents with arbitration agreements to submit their claims to binding arbitration. The circuit 

court entered an order granting arbitration to 93 residents and denying arbitration to the 

remaining 104 residents. In Robinson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC v. Phillips, 2022 Ark. 

109 (Phillips III), we held that “the circuit court [had] made no findings whatsoever[,]” and

remanded the case with instructions to the circuit court to make findings regarding its decision 

to deny Robinson’s motion to compel arbitration. Id. at 2.
3

On June 4, 2021, Robinson filed a memorandum motion to enforce arbitration 

agreements and to compel other class members with arbitration agreements to submit their 

claims to binding arbitration. This motion involved arbitration agreements signed by 33

residents at admission. On October 25, 2021, the circuit court entered an order granting in part 

with respect to 15 residents and denying in part with respect to 18 residents. Robinson appealed, 

and Phillips cross-appealed.

II. Circuit Court’s Order

Robinson raises several points in its brief, which was filed prior to this court’s opinion 

in Phillips III. Phillips filed a responsive brief and asserts that this case should be remanded for 

additional findings pursuant to this court’s holding in Phillips III. Robinson concedes in its reply 

brief that the case should be remanded for additional findings. 

In Phillips III, we specifically held:

We note . . . that in ruling on Robinson’s motion to compel arbitration, the 

circuit court made no findings whatsoever. The circuit court’s order, from which this 

appeal is taken, granted Robinson’s motion to compel arbitration as to 93 residents and 

denied it with respect to 104 residents. In Bank of the Ozarks, Inc. v. Walker, 2014 Ark. 

223, 434 S.W.3d 357, we were confronted with a similar situation, and we remanded the 

case to the circuit court to make appropriate findings. As in the case at bar, the circuit 

court in Walker denied a motion to compel arbitration without stating the basis for that 

decision. It is essential that we are made aware of the circuit court’s rationale for its 

decision so that we can conduct a proper appellate review. In accordance with Walker, 

we remand this case to the circuit court and instruct it to make findings regarding its 

decision denying Robinson’s motion to compel arbitration.

Id. at 2.

Here, the circuit court ruled on Robinson’s motion to enforce arbitration agreements, as 

follows:
4

4. Defendant’s Memorandum Motion to Enforce Arbitration Agreements And To Compel 

Class Members With Arbitration Agreements To Submit Their Claims To Binding Arbitration, 

filed on June 4, 2021, is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted with 

respect to: Elane Britt, Natalie Canard, John Dodds, Robert Hancock, Dorothy Jackson, 

Johnnie Jones, Bryan Lawrence, Elisa Miller, Penny Passe, Mona Roseanna Rea (listed 

on admission agreement as “Rea Mona Roseanna,” Dakeisha Ruffin, Terryl Sipes, 

Rudolph Walker, Corrine Walters, and Juanita Wilburn. The motion is denied with 

respect to: Wanda Bridges, Donna Casey, Iva Burns Knowles, Wanda Dorrell, Pamela 

Harris, Robert Haymes, Clarice Lackie, Craig MacDonald, Mary Magee, Naomi 

Maynard, Bill McCord, Thomas Myrick, Larry Pippen, Robert Rose, Margie Ruple, 

Charles Shryock, Shirley Taylor, and Vernie Throneberry. 

The circuit court again made no findings, other than granting in part and denying in 

part as to certain residents, without stating the basis for its decision. In order to conduct a proper 

appellate review, we must know the circuit court’s rationale for its decision. Id. Thus, in 

accordance with our holding in Phillips III, we remand the case with instructions for the circuit 

court to make findings regarding its order denying Robinson’s motion to compel arbitration. 

Remanded with instructions. 

SPECIAL JUSTICE GREG VARDAMAN joins.

BAKER, HUDSON, AND WYNNE, JJ., concur. 

WOOD, J., not participating.

ROBIN F. WYNNE, Justice, concurring. I agree with the majority’s disposition of this 

case. To be consistent with our decision in Robinson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC v. 

Phillips, 2022 Ark. 109 (“Robinson III”), we should remand this case with instructions for the 

circuit court to make findings. But I write separately to reiterate my disagreement with our 

decision in Robinson III for the reasons stated in the dissent. Id. at 3–5 (Hudson, J., dissenting).

I respectfully concur.
5

BAKER and HUDSON, JJ., join.

Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC (Little Rock), by: Jeffrey W. Hatfield, Kynda Almefty, and Carol 

Ricketts; and Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC (Fort Smith), by: Kirkman T. Dougherty and Stephanie I. 

Randall, for appellant.

Reddick Law, PLLC, by: Matthew D. Swindle and Heather G. Zachary; and Campbell Law 

Firm, P.A., by: H. Gregory Campbell, for appellees.