alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply11796Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Matt Duller (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 25, 2022 - 7:12amYou do have a great story Art... Your a great team player and asset to the team. Keep up the good work and continue to inspire!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
H. Res. 20 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 7, 2015. 

Whereas Alan Nunnelee, a Representative-elect from the 

First District of the State of Mississippi, has been unable, from illness, to appear in person to be sworn as a 

Member of the House, and there being no contest or 

question as to his election: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the Speaker, or deputy named by him, is 

hereby authorized to administer the oath of office to the Honorable Alan Nunnelee at Tupelo, Mississippi, and that such 

oath be accepted and received by the House as the oath of 

office of the Honorable Alan Nunnelee. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply397Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Bobbie Cade (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 14, 2021 - 1:57pmFor the first time in my life I want to visit our Capitol. Dick Gregory introduced me to the American story behind the freedom cap. Until today I believed it to be of French origin and monopoly. We never learned about the Freedom Statue in history classes--high school or college. Independent reading proves to be of more value that required, often rote learning.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# EUR-Lex - 12012M020 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M020

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE IV: PROVISIONS ON ENHANCED COOPERATION - Articles 20 (ex Article 27a to 27e, 40 to 40b and 43 to 45 TEU and ex Articles 11 and 11a TEC) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0027 - 0028 *

Article 20

(ex Articles 27a to 27e, 40 to 40b and 43 to 45 TEU and ex Articles 11 and 11a TEC)

1. Member States which wish to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves within the framework of the Union's non-exclusive competences may make use of its institutions and exercise those competences by applying the relevant provisions of the Treaties, subject to the limits and in accordance with the detailed arrangements laid down in this Article and in Articles 326 to 334 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

Enhanced cooperation shall aim to further the objectives of the Union, protect its interests and reinforce its integration process. Such cooperation shall be open at any time to all Member States, in accordance with Article 328 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

2. The decision authorising enhanced cooperation shall be adopted by the Council as a last resort, when it has established that the objectives of such cooperation cannot be attained within a reasonable period by the Union as a whole, and provided that at least nine Member States participate in it. The Council shall act in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 329 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

3. All members of the Council may participate in its deliberations, but only members of the Council representing the Member States participating in enhanced cooperation shall take part in the vote. The voting rules are set out in Article 330 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

4. Acts adopted in the framework of enhanced cooperation shall bind only participating Member States. They shall not be regarded as part of the acquis which has to be accepted by candidate States for accession to the Union.

--------------------------------------------------
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 16 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit the 

consideration of any bill or joint resolution carrying more than one subject. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. SCHWEIKERT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

prohibit the consideration of any bill or joint resolution 

carrying more than one subject. 

1 Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House 

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the 

3 following new clause: 

4 ‘‘Restrictions on bills and joint resolutions 

5 ‘‘12. It shall not be in order to consider any bill or 

6 joint resolution carrying more than one subject.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00399

- CR

David Nicholas GALLEGOS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR6229

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the judgment of the trial

court.

SIGNED May 29, 2013.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
In the Matter of 

United States of America 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

RECEIVED 

JUL 1 5 2013 

i=H!ARING DOCKET 

Southwest Airlines Co. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

FAA Case No. 2010SW290189 

Docket CP No.- To Be Assigned 

FDMS No. FAA 2013-0050 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FOR HEARING 

COMES NOW Respondent Southwest Airlines Co., through counsel, and 

pursuant to 14 CFR Section 13.215 hereby withdraws its Request for Hearing and its 

Answer in FAA Case No. 2010SW290189. 

Dated: July 12,2013 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dane B. Jaques, Esq. 

McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP 

1676 International Drive, Penthouse 

McLean, VA 22102 

(703) 336-8800 

djaques@mckennalong.com 

Counsel for Respondent Southwest Airlines Co. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing Withdrawal of 

Request for Hearing on the following party's counsel or designated representative, at the 

address indicated, by UPS overnight delivery: 

Yolanda Ayala Bernal, ASW-7E2 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Southwest Region 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

Fax: 817-222-5945 or 5092 

I also certify that I have this day served the original and one copy of the foregoing 

Withdrawal of Request for Hearing on the following, at the address indicated, by UPS 

overnight delivery: 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Fax:202-493-5142 

I also certifY that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing Withdrawal of 

Request for Hearing on the following, at the address indicated, by UPS overnight 

delivery: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dated this 12th day of July, 2013. 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

Ja~ s A. Eastwood 

M enna Long & Aldridge LLP 

1676 International Drive, Penthouse 

McLean, VA 22102 

2 

Tel: 703-336-8800 

Fax: 703-336-8750
Cksza 

Appellant may file an appeal after an appealable, written 

order or judgment is filed. Because we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, 

we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

Pdrraguirre 

Douglas 

Cherry 

J. 

J. 

cc: Hon. Frank P. Sullivan, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Fredrica Charlee Ballard 

Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A *Cetr.
April 17, 2003

24304

#### State v. Crawford

Affirmed
10219

#### International Savings & Loan v. Pinacate, McCully Associates v. Pinacate

Dismissed
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Pauline Neulander et al., as Executors of Joe Neulander, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

May 20, 1959.

*Louis M. Weber*for executors.

*Jacob Ziff,*as special guardian.

John D. Bennett, S.

In this accounting proceeding the account will be settled as filed and amended.

The attorney’s fee is allowed in the amount requested and is for all services rendered, including the submission of a decree hereunder and implementation thereof. An affidavit itemizing the attorney’s disbursements should be submitted together with the decree.

The claim of the certified public accountants in the amount of $5,000, of which $1,000 has already been paid, has been included in the executors’ account as an allowed claim. Consequently, there being no objection to this claim, it is allowed in the full amount.

Settle decree on five days’ notice.
## Exhibit 5

– Safety Margin Testing

A series of emissions analyses were undertaken to assist GA EPD in developing the MVEB safety margins.

These tests include a worst case scenario of the RTP horizon year, 2040, which produces 10% more VMT

than projected, 1 million more inhabitants (reflected in source type population), and an age distribution

2 years older than current data suggests for the year 2040. These analyses were developed to help GA

EPD establish a realistic motor vehicle emissions budget safety margin for use in transportation

conformity. 2040 and the 2040 worst case emissions are reflected in Table 1 and 2, below.



### Table 1

– 2040 Scenario Testing Daily Ozone Precursor Emissions

Pollutant 2040 Tons/Day

(% above 2024) 2040 Worst Case Tons/Year

(% above 2024)

NO

x 103.42 (4%) 126.24 (27%)

VOC 70.97 (14%) 91.70 (47%)



### Table 2

– 2040 Scenario testing Annual PM2.5 Precursor Emissions

Pollutant 2040 Tons/Year

(% above 2024) 2040 Worst Case Tons/Year

(% above 2024)

NO

x 36,150.78 (3%) 44,429.34 (26%)

PM 2.5 1,938.27 (18%) 2,281.15 (39%)
#### Bauknecht et al., Exrs., Appellees, *v.*Vollnogle et al., Appellants, et al., Appellees. Chamberlain et al., Appellees, *v.*Vollnogle et al., Appellants, et al., Appellees.

(Nos. 31651 and 31652

Decided February 2, 1949.)

*Messrs. Vodrey, Vodrey, Buzzard £ Shay,*for plaintiffs-appellees.

*Messrs. Harrington, Huxley £ Smith, Mr. C. Kenneth Clark*and *Mr. Robert A. Manchester,*for appellants.

*Messrs. Moo.re £ Moore*and *Messrs. Metzger, Mc-Corkhill £ Metzger,*for defendants-appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that these appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeals dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart and Turner, JJ., concur.
168 P.3d 1018

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

October 5, 2007

27361

#### N.M-O, In re

Affirmed
Exhibit 10.5

                                  Translation


               Agency of the Republic of Kazakstan on Investments


                                              Central Asian Petroleum (Guernsey)
                                              Limited
                                              2211 Norfolk, Suite 1150
                                              Houston TX 77098

                                              Copy: Shell Capital Services Ltd.
                                              Attn: Mr. Mark L.G. Turner

     Having considered your letter dated 21.07.99 regarding funding the
Karakuduk project, the Agency of the Republic of Kazakstan on Investments
confirms that if "Karakudukmunai" LLP will not perform licensing obligations on
investing USD 30,000,000 before 31.12.99, the License of "Karakudukmunai" LLP
will not be recalled and the penalties will not be imposed, under condition that
such nonperformance of obligations will not last more than till 30.06.2000.



Chairman                   (signature)                               A. Saidenov
106 P.3d 1121

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Darris

25604

12/16/2004

Affirmed
26624

#### State v. Vierra

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Philadelphia, 1775
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1974

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

On July 4, 1776, delegates to the second Continental Congress issued the Declaration of Independence at Philadelphia's State House, now known as Independence Hall.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. Cox first executed the murals in the eastern north-south corridor, starting work in 1973 and finishing in 1974. This corridor has been termed the Hall of Capitols because it features paintings of 16 different buildings that housed the Continental and United States Congresses from 1754 to 1865. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
EXHIBIT 23.0
                                                                    ------------



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of Nexen Inc.:

         o        Registration Statement No.'s 033-26582, 033-34467, 033-43426,
                  033-66538, 033-81334, 333-05494, 333-07344, 333-09286 and
                  333-13574 on Form S-8;

         o        Registration Statement No.'s 333-09288, 333-10646 and
                  333-84786 on Form F-3; and

         o        Registration Statement No.'s 333-08142, 333-09542, 333-09856,
                  333-88254 and 333-109747 on Form F-9

of our report dated February 9, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to (i) the application of
procedures relating to certain reclassifications of financial statement amounts
for discontinued operations, and (ii) the adoption of a new accounting
principle, both related to the 2001 consolidated financial statements that were
audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and for which we have
expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other than with respect to such
disclosures and reclassifications), appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Nexen Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

(signed) "Deloitte & Touche LLP"

Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

February 20, 2004
EXHIBIT 10.23


AMSOUTH BANK






March 6, 2002

Mr. Davis Woodward
Vice President, Finance
Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc.
147 Keystone Dr.
Montgomeryville, PA 18936

Dear Dave:

Kindly let this letter clarify and confirm to you that the language set forth
below, which amends the provisions of Section 7.02 of the Revolving Loan
Agreement dated May 31, 2000 between AmSouth Bank and Surgical Laser
Technologies, Inc., is language that reflects AmSouth's intent from the
beginning of the Agreement.

That language reads as follows:

"The borrower shall maintain interest coverage of 2.25X as measured over the one
year period beginning the first day of the Borrower's then beginning Fiscal Year
and ending on the last day of the Borrower's same Fiscal Year. Interest Coverage
is defined as net income plus interest expense plus depreciation expense divided
by interest expense."

Under the foregoing language, you have affirmed that Surgical Laser
Technologies, Inc. would have been in compliance with Section 7.02 of the
Revolving Loan Agreement and you would have certified to the same. The Bank
accepts that affirmation.

If you should have any questions concerning this, please do not hesitate to
contact me.

Sincerely,


Rhett D. Jordan
Vice President
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Brian E. Dearing, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to me by others within those entities, particularly during the periods in which thisreport is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periods covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated: March 17, 2008   /s/ Brian E. Dearing Brian E. Dearing  Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer