alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
IEA Income Fund XII, L.P.
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
          I, John Kallas, certify that:
          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income FundXII, L.P. (the “Registrant”);
          2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
          4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:
                (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
                (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on ourevaluation; and
                (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
          5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
                (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
                (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004
/s/ JOHN KALLAS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2

                            3333 HOLDING CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         THE UNDERSIGNED hereby constitutes and appoints J. Stephen Bilheimer,
with full power of substitution in the premises, as the undersigned's true and
lawful agent and attorney-in-fact (the "Attorney-in-Fact"), with full power and
authority in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in his capacity as a
Director of 3333 Holding Corporation (the "Company"), to execute and file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the Company's fiscal year ended March 31, 1998, together with any and all
amendments thereto.

         This Power of Attorney and all authority granted and conferred hereby
shall continue indefinitely and, unless waived by the Attorney-in-Fact, may not
be revoked until the Attorney-in-Fact has received five days' written notice of
such revocation.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 22nd day of June, 1998.




                                                   /s/ Josiah O. Low, III
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Josiah O. Low, III
                                           Director
                                           3333 Holding Corporation




<PAGE>   2



                            3333 HOLDING CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         THE UNDERSIGNED hereby constitutes and appoints J. Stephen Bilheimer,
with full power of substitution in the premises, as the undersigned's true and
lawful agent and attorney-in-fact (the "Attorney-in-Fact"), with full power and
authority in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in his capacity as a
Director of 3333 Holding Corporation (the "Company"), to execute and file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the Company's fiscal year ended March 31, 1998, together with any and all
amendments thereto.

         This Power of Attorney and all authority granted and conferred hereby
shall continue indefinitely and, unless waived by the Attorney-in-Fact, may not
be revoked until the Attorney-in-Fact has received five days' written notice of
such revocation.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 22nd day of June, 1998.




                                                      /s/ David M. Sherer
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               David M. Sherer
                                               Director
                                               3333 Holding Corporation
Responsibilities for Field Coordinators 

In the AOC, each jurisdiction has designated staff members to act as Field Coordinators (FC) to 

assist their employees when filing injury or disease claims. The FC is responsible for: 

 Assisting injured employees with completion of injury forms. 

 Entering injury case data into the Workers’ Compensation module in AVUE. (This is the 

only system used in the Architect of the Capitol to record traumatic and occupational 

disease claims in the Agency.) 

 Authorizing medical treatment when employees file traumatic injury claims. The FC 

authorizes medical treatment by use of Form CA-16, along with issuing FECA forms 

CA-17, and CA-20. Employees who file occupational disease claims are not issued CA16s. Form CA-16 should not be issued after 7 calendar days from the date of the injury. 

 Receiving all medical documentation that supports the injury or disease claim. The FC 

ensures all medical evidence is forwarded to the Workers’ Compensation Program Unit 

(WCPU) in a timely manner. 

 Referring injured employees to the Attending Physician Office prior to returning to work 

after a period of disability. 

 Maintaining contact with the injured employee (with supervisor’s assistance) while the 

employee is disabled. 

 Answering routing employee questions about the program and the status of injury claims. 

 Coordinating all controversions and disputes with the supervisor, Safety Specialist and 

the WCPU. 

 Reviewing injury forms for accuracy and bringing all questionable claims immediately to 

the attention of the WCPU. 

 Monitoring medical evidence to ensure eligibility of Continuation of Pay (COP). 

Ensuring the employee’s time and attendance records are properly recorded for any time 

lost due to the injury and coordination with the supervisor to ensure that all COP is 

properly supported by medical documentation within the time requirements of the FECA. 

 Coordinating all Short-Term Modified Work Assignments within their organization and 

the WPCU.
# L_2005102EN.01000801.xml

| 21.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/8

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 142/2004

of 29 October 2004

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 122/2004 of 24 September 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 122/2004 of 24 September 2004 (1).

| (2) | Directive 2004/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending Council Directives 70/156/EEC and 80/1268/EEC as regards the measurement of carbon dioxide emissions and fuel consumption of N1 vehicles (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2004/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending Council Directives 70/156/EEC and 80/1268/EEC as regards the measurement of carbon dioxide emissions and fuel consumption of N1 vehicles (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

| ‘— | 32004 L 0003: Directive 2004/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 (OJ L 49, 19.2.2004, p. 36).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32004 L 0003: Directive 2004/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 (OJ L 49, 19.2.2004, p. 36).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2004/3/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 October 2004, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 October 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kjartan JÓHANNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 64, 10.3.2005, p. 18.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 49, 19.2.2004, p. 36.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Edward S. Staub, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Queens County,

February 10, 1959.

*Charles Ettinger*for Ruth M. Staub, petitioner.

*Harrison Tophis,*as special guardian for Robert L. Staub, an infant.

Anthony P. Savarese, S.

The testator died on December 2, 1958, leaving a will which was executed on March 27, 1943. Under the will, the entire estate is given to his surviving spouse. A child was born to the testator’s wife on November 22, 1945, subsequent to the execution of the will. Thereafter, the testator provided for the after-born child as follows: by purchasing United States Savings Bonds naming the infant and himself as co-owners; by opening a joint savings account in the name of the infant and himself; by taking out a life insurance policy designating the infant as beneficiary; and by providing an annuity for the infant under a pension plan. Under all these circumstances the court determines that the after-born child of the testator was provided for by a “ settlement” within the meaning of section 26 of the Decedent Estate Law, and that he is not entitled to share in the testamentary estate of the decedent. (See *Matter of Faber,*305 N. Y. 200; *Matter of Anderson,*205 Misc. 151.)

Submit decree on notice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

     
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995           
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1995           
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1995              
<CASH>                          514840                 
<SECURITIES>                    0                       
<RECEIVABLES>                   13812256              
<ALLOWANCES>                    200000                  
<INVENTORY>                     0                     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0                      
<PP&E>                          0                       
<DEPRECIATION>                  0                        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  16215757              
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0                       
<BONDS>                         0                        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           2001472                 
<PREFERRED>                     0                             
<COMMON>                        0                          
<OTHER-SE>                      14214285                 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    16215757                
<SALES>                         0                         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1450487                   
<CGS>                           0                         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   68387                     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0                       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                306779                    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              163361                   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 911960                     
<INCOME-TAX>                    0                              
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             911960                    
<DISCONTINUED>                  0                        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0                          
<CHANGES>                       0                          
<NET-INCOME>                    911960                     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .00                      
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .00                        
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DynTek, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge and upon a review of the Report that:

    (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

    (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Financial Officer, my own due diligence and representations made by
certain members of the Company's senior management.

Dated:  May  14, 2004                  /s/ Steven J. Ross
                                       --------------------------
                                       Steven J. Ross
                                       Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Brian E. Dearing, Chairman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to me by others within those entities, particularly during the periods in which thisreport is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periods covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated: December 17, 2007        /s/ Brian E. Dearing   Brian E. Dearing   Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer
#### Gene Ruder, Appellant, v Henry Lewandowski et al., Respondents.

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.), entered October 3, 1989, which, *inter alia,*denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, unanimously reversed, to the extent appealed from, on the law, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted, with costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $50,000 with interest from February 8, 1989 at 7% per annum, with costs.

Plaintiff sues to recover on a $50,000 promissory note executed on December 22, 1986 by defendant Henry Lewandowski and guaranteed by defendant Richard M. Lipsman. In opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint (CPLR 3213), defendants urged that the purpose of the note was to afford plaintiff evidence of an investment in HLV Realty Corp., of which both defendants are officers and directors, and that the note was satisfied in full by the grant to plaintiff of an equity interest in HLV common stock pursuant to a nominee agreement dated February 25, 1987. There is nothing in that agreement making reference to the promissory note, so that agreement may not serve as an agreement modifying the defendants’ obligations pursuant to UCC 3-119 (1). *(See, Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v Borne,*599 F Supp 891, 894.)

Moreover, an agreement dated June 16, 1988, signed by plaintiff and Lewandowski, explicitly confirms that the note in question was still payable to the plaintiff, and that the HLV shares were pledged to plaintiff as collateral security for repayment of the note. Acceptance of the defendants’ version of the transaction would require the admission of parol evi*407deuce contradicting the terms of the note, which are confirmed by the June 16, 1988 agreement. Such evidence is not admissible *(Leumi Fin. Corp. v Richter,*17 NY2d 166, 173; *Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v Margolis,*115 AD2d 406; *Chase Manhattan Bank v Kahn,*66 AD2d 704; *Loeffler Co. v Port,*40 AD2d 900). Accordingly, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint should have been granted. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES ) No. ACM 39856 (f rev)

Appellee )

)

v. )

) ORDER

Michael J. WERMUTH )

Airman First Class (E-3) )

U.S. Air Force )

Appellant ) Special Panel

This case is before the court for a second time. In an earlier opinion, we 

determined the convening authority had failed to take action on the sentence 

as required by Executive Order 13,825, § 6(b), 83 Fed. Reg. 9889, 9890 (8 Mar. 

2018), and Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. 

§ 860 (Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.)),* and we remanded 

Appellant’s case to the Chief Trial Judge, Air Force Trial Judiciary, for corrective action. See United States v. Wermuth, No. ACM 39856, 2021 CCA LEXIS 

378, at *7–8 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 30 Jul. 2021). The case was re-docketed with 

the court on 17 September 2021.

The re-docketed record of trial contains a corrected entry of judgement 

(EoJ), dated 7 September 2021. The corrected EoJ contains a list of attachments, including “Corrected Convening Authority Decision on Action, dated 31 

August 2021.” However, the re-docketed record of trial contains no such attachment. Instead, where this document should appear, there is an 8 September 

2021 corrected “Convening Authority Decision on Action” for a different appellant’s case.

In accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1112(b)(8), the record 

of trial shall contain “[a]ny action by the convening authority . . . .” A superior 

competent authority may return the record of trial to the military judge for 

correction, R.C.M. 1112(d)(2), and this court may order additional proceedings 

in a case when warranted, see Article 66(f)(3),UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(f)(3).

Accordingly it is by the court on this 1st day of April, 2022,

ORDERED:

 

* Unless otherwise noted, all references in this order to the UCMJ and Rules for CourtsMartial are to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2019 ed.).
United States v. Wermuth, No. ACM 39856 (f rev)

2

Pursuant to R.C.M. 1112(d)(2) and Article 66(f)(3), UCMJ, the record of 

trial in this case is returned to the Chief Trial Judge, Air Force Trial Judiciary, 

to resolve a substantial issue with the completeness of the record of trial, due 

to the incorrect convening authority’s decision on action memorandum being 

placed in Appellant’s record of trial.

The record of trial will be returned to the court not later than 22 April

2022, for completion of appellate review under Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. 

§ 866.

If the ROT cannot be returned to the court by 22 April 2022, the Government will inform the court in writing no later than 22 April 2022 of the status 

of compliance with this order. 

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court