alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  August 22, 2005 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                          
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                       | Marc N. Teal, 
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.8



Consent of Independent Auditors





We consent to use of our report dated March 28, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. as at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2004 included in this Annual Report (Form 40-F) for 2004 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 033-63210 and 333-67933) pertaining to the Stock Option Plans of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. of our report dated March 28, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. as at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2004 included in this Annual Report (Form 40-F) for the year ended December 31, 2004.









Calgary, Canada

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

March 31, 2005

Chartered Accountants
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated July 16, 2018, with respect to the financial statement of Smart Trust 389 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-224602) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 16, 2018
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RYAN ADAM DIXON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

ELIZABETH BERNS; MATTHEW SCOTT 

GOGUEN; JIE LIANG GOGUEN, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

YVONNE CURTIS; JENNI R.W. 

HALLACK; CYNTHIA BUHR; STATE OF 

WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL; WASHINGTON 

STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, 

Defendants.

No. 21-35902 

D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00070-RSM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 8, 2022**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-35902 

Before: WALLACE, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Ryan Adam Dixon appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action related to state court proceedings that 

terminated his parental rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We 

review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Puri 

v. Khalsa, 844 F.3d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Dixon’s action because Dixon failed to 

allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 

662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient factual 

matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face” 

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072, 

1075 (9th Cir. 1986) (judges are absolutely immune from damage liability for 

judicial acts). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Dixon’s action

without leave to amend because amendment would have been futile. See

Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011)

(setting forth standard of review and explaining that dismissal without leave to 

amend is proper where amendment would be futile). 

We reject as unsupported by the record Dixon’s contention that the district 

court erred by failing to address various motions. 
3 21-35902 

Dixon’s motion for voluntary dismissal as to appellees Mathew Scott 

Gogeun and Jie Liang Goguen (Docket Entry No. 17) is granted. This appeal is 

dismissed as to appellees Mathew Scott Gogeun and Jie Liang Goguen only. See 

Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Dixon’s motion for proof of admission to practice (Docket 

Entry No. 8) is denied.

AFFIRMED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4366

_____________________________
J OHN L. C OLLINS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Steven B. Whittington , Judge

. May 15, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , R AY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 John L. Collins, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
23498

#### State v. Tavares

Vacated and Remanded
H. R. 891 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 141 Paloma 

Drive in Floresville, Texas, as the ‘‘Floresville Veterans Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FLORESVILLE VETERANS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 141 Paloma Drive in Floresville, Texas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Floresville Veterans Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Floresville Veterans Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE AMMAR AL-ALI, DON CAROTHERS, 

DAVID DALKE, MOHAMED K. DIAB, 

JULIAN M. GOLDMAN, MASSI E. KIANI, 

MICHAEL LEE, JEROME NOVAK, ROBERT SMITH,

AND VAL E. VADEN

____________________ 

2011-1086 

(Serial No. 10/153,263) 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

JOSEPH R. RE, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, 

of Irvine, California, argued for appellant. With him on 

the brief were JOSEPH S. CIANFRANI, JOHN M. GROVER and 

CHRISTINA J. MCCULLOUGH; and COLIN B. HEIDEMAN, of 

Seattle, Washington. 

MARY L. KELLY, Associate Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, 

argued for appellee. With her on the brief were RAYMOND 

T. CHEN, Solicitor and JOSEPH G. PICCOLO, Associate 

Solicitor. Of counsel was SYDNEY O. JOHNSON, JR.,

Associate Solicitor. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, SCHALL and BRYSON, 

Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 7, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
#### Gill v. Weaver

15318

12/06/96

Reversed and Remanded
126 P.3d 426

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

January 6, 2006

25889

#### First Union Nat. Bank v. Canales

Affirmed
|   | /s/      Barbara T.      Alexander                       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Barbara      T. AlexanderDirectorCentex      Corporation |

----

|   | /s/      Timothy R.      Eller                       |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Timothy      R. EllerDirectorCentex      Corporation |

----

|   | /s/      Ursula O.      Fairbairn                       |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Ursula O.      FairbairnDirectorCentex      Corporation |

----

|   | /s/      Thomas J.      Falk                       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Thomas J.      FalkDirectorCentex      Corporation |

----

|   | /s/      Clint W. Murchison,      III                       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Clint W.      Murchison, IIIDirectorCentex      Corporation |

----

|   | /s/      Frederic M.      Poses                       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Frederic      M. PosesDirectorCentex      Corporation |

----

|   | /s/      James J.      Postl                       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | James J.      PostlDirectorCentex      Corporation |

----

|   | /s/      David W.      Quinn                       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | David W.      QuinnDirectorCentex      Corporation |

----

|   | /s/      Matthew K.      Rose                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Matthew      K. RoseDirectorCentex      Corporation |

----

|   | /s/      Thomas M.      Schoewe                       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Thomas M.      SchoeweDirectorCentex      Corporation |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 317 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 317

 Congratulating American Pharoah and owner Ahmed Zayat of Teaneck, New 
            Jersey, for winning horse racing's Triple Crown.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2015

 Mr. Pascrell (for himself, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Norcross, Mr. Sires, Mr. 
    Lance, Mr. MacArthur, Mr. Payne, and Mr. Yarmuth) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                         and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating American Pharoah and owner Ahmed Zayat of Teaneck, New 
            Jersey, for winning horse racing's Triple Crown.

Whereas, on June 6, 2015, American Pharoah raced to victory at the Belmont 
        Stakes, winning the 1\1/2\-mile race in 2:26.65;
Whereas a horse must win the Kentucky Derby, the Preakness Stakes, and the 
        Belmont Stakes to achieve the Triple Crown, regarded as thoroughbred 
        horse racing's greatest accomplishment;
Whereas American Pharoah is the first horse since 1978 to win the Triple Crown, 
        thus becoming the 12th Triple Crown winner;
Whereas American Pharoah is a descendant of the 1973 Triple Crown winner, 
        Secretariat;
Whereas American Pharaoh owner Ahmed Zayat was born and raised in Cairo, Egypt, 
        and began horse racing at an early age, competing in show jumping, and 
        winning national titles as a child in the under-12 and under-14 age 
        divisions;
Whereas Ahmed Zayat a resident of Teaneck, New Jersey, is CEO of Zayat Stables, 
        well-known for success in American Thoroughbred horse racing;
Whereas American Pharoah was trained by Bob Baffert, an inductee of the National 
        Museum of Racing's Hall of Fame; and
Whereas jockey Victor Espinoza successfully rode American Pharoah in each of the 
        three legs of the Triple Crown: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates--
            (1) American Pharoah and owner Ahmed Zayat of Teaneck for 
        his achievement of the Triple Crown, as well as his wife, 
        Joanne, and their four children, Ashley, Justin, Benjamin, and 
        Emma.
                                 <all>
```
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply630Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Michael J Lill... (not verified)PermalinkNovember 6, 2019 - 12:38pmTHANK YOU, for this background on where and how this tree is selected, I can't be there to see this display but wait until this event is shown.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 11, 2013

NO. 03-13-00264-CV

Trinity Hardwood Distributors, Inc., Appellant

v.

J.T. Shannon Lumber Company d/b/a Shamrock Plank Flooring, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS DAY came on to be submitted to this Court appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal in the 

above cause, and the Court having fully considered said motion, and being of the opinion that 

same should be granted: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that said 

motion is granted, and that the appeal is dismissed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision 

be certified below for observance.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 16, 2021

No. 04-21-00242-CV

ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS and Bill Magness,

Appellants

v.

CPS ENERGY,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-CI-04574

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is 

extended to September 13, 2021.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of August, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00434-CR

Shonda Lee Moxley

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant Coun ty (1417154D)

March 3, 2016

Per Curiam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
#### Hermi Jedlicka, Respondent, v JSPOL Investors Corp. et al., Appellants.

—In an action to impose a constructive trust on certain real property, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated January 22, 1990, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In 1982, while the plaintiff and the defendant Milan Jedlicka were married, they purchased certain real property located at 86-91 Marengo Street in Holliswood for use as the marital residence, the title of which was placed solely in the plaintiff’s name. Some two years later, Milan Jedlicka allegedly convinced the plaintiff to transfer ownership of the property to the defendant JSPOL Investors Corporation (hereinafter JSPOL), which was owned by the defendants George Jedlicka and Larry Jedlicka. According to the plaintiff, Milan Jedlicka told her that the conveyance was necessary to protect the property from their creditors and that it would be reconveyed to her when he "clear[ed] up” their debts.

When the defendants refused to convey the property to the plaintiff, she brought this action seeking to impose a constructive trust on the property. The defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground, *inter alia,*that they had paid full consideration for the property and that the plaintiff was barred by the doctrine of unclean hands was denied by the Supreme Court.

Since a review of the record indicates that there exists a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff received, any consideration for the transfer of the property, the Supreme *653Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In addition, it has been stated that a defendant who has persuaded a plaintiff to transfer property for the purpose of defrauding creditors will be estopped from invoking the equitable defense of unclean hands *(see, Dillon v Dean,*158 AD2d 579). Furthermore, where a confidential relationship exists between the parties and one party relies on the advice of the other, the clean hands doctrine will not bar judicial scrutiny of the dominant party’s malfeasance *(see, Dillon v Dean, supra).*In the present case, there are questions of fact as to Milan Jedlicka’s culpability in the transaction and the degree of control he exerted over the plaintiff and the other parties, which preclude the granting of summary judgment. Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of infoUSA Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, (i) the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: May 10, 2004 */s/ Raj Das*   Raj Das, Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-086-CV

IN RE CONGLOMERATE GAS II, L.P.	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

							JOHN CAYCE

							CHIEF JUSTICE

PANEL A:  CAYCE, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and MCCOY, JJ.

MCCOY, J. would request a response.

DELIVERED:  March 10, 2008
930 P.2d 1015

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Kim

17823

12/04/96

Vacated and Remanded