alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

Union Calendar No. 316 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 901 

[Report No. 114–415] 

To prohibit accessing pornographic web sites from Federal computers, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2015 

Mr. MEADOWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

FEBRUARY 4, 2016 

Additional sponsor: Mr. JONES

FEBRUARY 4, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 901 RH

A BILL 

To prohibit accessing pornographic web sites from Federal 

computers, and for other purposes. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 901 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating Pornog5 raphy from Agencies Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCESSING PORNOGRAPHIC WEB 

7 SITES FROM FEDERAL COMPUTERS. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in subsection 

9 (b), not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and 

11 Budget shall issue guidelines that prohibit the access of 

12 a pornographic or other explicit web site from a Federal 

13 computer. 

14 (b) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition described in sub15 section (a) shall not apply to any Federal computer that 

16 is used for an investigative purpose that requires accessing 

17 a pornographic web site. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 316 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 901 

[Report No. 114–415] 

A BILL 

To prohibit accessing pornographic web sites from 

Federal computers, and for other purposes. 

FEBRUARY 4, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Moreira v. Badua

18148

9/27/96

Affirmed, Vacated and Remanded
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly
Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 (the “Report”),
I, L’Sheryl D. Hudson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                   
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2014 |  | /s/ L’Sheryl D. Hudson                            
|                    |  | L’Sheryl D. Hudson
        Chief Financial Officer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Representative William Colmer Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Southern Magnolia

Year
    1980

Location
      
Capitol Square, S.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text on Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Memorial Tree

*Magnolia grandiflora*
(Southern Magnolia)

In Commemoration of the
Honorable William M. Colmer

December 15, 1980
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    The Rep. Colmer tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.

The Rep. Colmer tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
    The Rep. Colmer tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.

The Rep. Colmer tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.
    The Rep. Colmer tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.

The Rep. Colmer tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
    The Rep. Colmer tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

The Rep. Colmer tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring.

      Previous Image
        Next Image

          The Rep. Colmer tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during summer.
      The Rep. Colmer tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during fall.
      The Rep. Colmer tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during winter.
      The Rep. Colmer tree on the U.S. Capitol Grounds during spring. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00054

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.H. , a C hild

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- PA

- 00641

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal.

SIGNED July 1 , 2015.

_____________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 2
- 10
- 311
- CR

RUBEN ELOY M ARTINEZ APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------ Appellant Ruben Eloy Martinez attempts to appeal from the trial court’s judgment sentencing him to twelve years’ confinement for possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance of four grams or more, but less th an 200 grams, namely: cocaine. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Martinez’s sentence was imposed on June 2, 2010. Martinez filed a motion for new trial and a notice of appeal on July 21, 2010, even though they were due on July 2, 2010. 2 See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). We sent notice to Martinez on August 4, 2010, stating that because of the apparent untimeliness of his notice of appeal, we would dismiss the appeal unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal responded by Au gust 16, 2010, and showed grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b)(1)

– (2). Martinez filed a response that did not show grounds for continuing
the appeal. The lack of a timely notice of appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction. Se e
State v. Riewe , 13 S.W.3d 408, 410 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Slaton v. State , 98 1

S.W.2d 208
, 209

– 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 199 8 ); Mays v. State
, No. 02

- 07

- 00442

- CR, 2008 WL 820198, at *1 (Tex. App.

–– Fort Worth Mar. 27, 2008, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designate d for publication) . Therefore, because Martinez failed to timely file his notice of appeal in the proper location and failed to provide us with

2 Martinez sent his motion for new trial and his notice of appeal to the district attorney ’s office on June 30, 2010, but they were not received by the district clerk’s office until July 21, 2010. Neither Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(c) nor Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.2 mention s anything about filing the notice of appeal with the district attorney’s office. Moreover, several cases hold that delivering the notice of appeal to the district attorney’s office does not constitute filing the notice of appeal with the proper authority. See Dean v. State , No. 06

- 10

- 00007

- CR, 2010 WL 533071, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.

–

– Texarkana Feb. 12, 2010 , no pet. ) (mem . op., not designated for publication); Snowden v. State , No. 04

- 99

- 00772

- CR, 1999 WL 1261819, at *1 (Tex. App.

– – San Antonio Dec. 29, 1999, no pet. ) (not designated for publication).3

grounds for continuing his appeal, we must dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43 .2(f).

SUE WALKER JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 23
, 2010
168 P.3d 606

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

September 21, 2007

26989

#### State v. Akau

Affirmed
**Exhibit 32.1**

**LASERSIGHT INCORPORATED**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of LaserSight Incorporated (the “Company”) does hereby certify that: 

|   | 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the   Company for quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with   the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | 2. The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.                                                                                                         |

| Dated: August 14, 2006 | /s/ Danghui (“David”) Liu |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                   |                                     |
|                   | **Danghui (“David”) Liu** |
|                   | **Chief   Executive Officer**       |

          The certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended. 

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 1350, has been provided to LaserSight Incorporated and will be retained LaserSight Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

----
#### Clinton C. Harrell, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 35803.)

Court of Claims,

July 22, 1959.

*Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Melvyn N. Thaler*of counsel), for defendant.

*Friedman & Tandler (Donald S. Sherwood*of counsel), for claimant.

Sidney Squire, J.

The defendant moves, pursuant to subdivision 2 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the claim because the claimant *“*has not legal capacity to sue ”. Said claimant is incarcerated in Sing Sing Prison serving a sentence of 5 to 10 years.

The movant relies upon section 510 of the Penal Law, bearing the heading ‘1 Forfeiture of office and suspension of civil rights ’ ’, which suspends, during the term of claimant’s sentence, his civil right to institute or continue this negligence action *“*with respect to matters other than those arising out of his arrest or detention * * * ”.

Claimant opposes the motion by urging that said section 510 is unconstitutional in that it violates section 1 of article I of the Constitution of our State and the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.

We rule that said section is not unconstitutional. The motion to dismiss the claim is granted. The claim is dismissed without prejudice to renewal when the proscription in section 510 is no longer applicable.

Short-form order signed.
\[\-l{1>-t^

TWtArzh c£lC<£c>/^

JtecuuGkeL.

Xjj)i<J- r&)iiJA(J 4. eapy 3/tba Jad/c,( a/? m^ sr)J^/;J

ft\r 49A&4sm'Xj ti*( -thg && rH^^ nf /nasefi cgrfytf. t^a< nJ/^>A lj^-

il JJ '

Uf.

-RECEIVED4NCOURT OF CRIMINAL APPFA|g

_APR_o^-201~5-

_MeI.Acosta,.GJerkkfin* Yjtf/<Z/>mJ iVj223/6 7-

jS^A^^Jh^JJLyJ^OI V

$>.

fV

^^iPV

c/i

"SB 3f?~-

^D .. '(Si

i

l\3 ri ijfpS'
<5j)^ Mfao/d % 7ted 7

mmcmr

~'£KMl CAnv^-

FlLFfi

•U SAN AN-'CNiP, '|VV,:. '

2015APR-2 AMI): 55

I'tAs^'—'—sifc-30sd :' |H||li'l'JiH|HjljJiJll,)/n!/j^

COURT OF APPEALS

FourthCourtofAppeals District

CadenaReevesJustice Center

300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200

San Antonio, Texas 78205-3037

S&ft.AJOTQNIO

OFFICIACBCTSINESS

STATl^AikLTY

FOR PRIVATE USE

Court of Criminal Appeals

P.O. Box 12308

Austin, TX. 78711

""

"?87i i:£30S~'8 li,li.ll,ll..illlli,lllllll,.l.l.l.l.,iJ,l
#### State v. Dowler

16286

1/24/96

Dismissed

80 Hawai'i 246, 909 P.2d 574
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 961 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 961

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
            subpart F exemption for active financing income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2015

Mr. Tiberi (for himself, Mr. Neal, Mr. Kind, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, 
  Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Thompson of California, Mr. Reed, Mr. Roskam, Mr. 
  Young of Indiana, and Mr. Boustany) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
            subpart F exemption for active financing income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT SUBPART F EXEMPTION FOR ACTIVE FINANCING INCOME.

    (a) Banking, Financing, or Similar Businesses.--Section 954(h) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rule for income 
derived in the active conduct of banking, financing, or similar 
businesses) is amended by striking paragraph (9).
    (b) Insurance Businesses.--Section 953(e) of such Code (relating to 
exempt insurance income) is amended by striking paragraph (10) and by 
redesignating paragraph (11) as paragraph (10).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years of a foreign corporation beginning after 
December 31, 2014, and to taxable years of United States shareholders 
with or within which such taxable years of such foreign corporation 
end.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

37.   Declaration on Article 222 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 222 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Without prejudice to the measures adopted by the Union to comply with its solidarity obligation towards a Member State which is the object of a terrorist attack or the victim of natural or man-made disaster, none of the provisions of Article 222 is intended to affect the right of another Member State to choose the most appropriate means to comply with its own solidarity obligation towards that Member State.

---
27203

#### Watase v. Kapihe

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

               <ARTICLE>                        5
                      
               <S>                              <C>
               <PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
               <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1996
               <PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-1996
               <CASH>                            2,444,939
               <SECURITIES>                              0
               <RECEIVABLES>                    10,494,109
               <ALLOWANCES>                      1,713,327
               <INVENTORY>                       3,267,392
               <CURRENT-ASSETS>                 15,975,700
               <PP&E>                            2,708,678
               <DEPRECIATION>                      686,301
               <TOTAL-ASSETS>                   32,908,833
               <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             6,238,360
               <BONDS>                                   0
               <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
               <PREFERRED>                               0
               <COMMON>                              8,251
               <OTHER-SE>                       24,775,458
               <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     32,908,833
               <SALES>                          15,070,482
               <TOTAL-REVENUES>                 15,070,482
               <CGS>                             5,258,207
               <TOTAL-COSTS>                     5,258,207
               <OTHER-EXPENSES>                 13,509,477
               <LOSS-PROVISION>                    462,500
               <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  102,068
               <INCOME-PRETAX>                  (4,429,768)
               <INCOME-TAX>                     (1,119,378)
               <INCOME-CONTINUING>              (3,310,390)
               <DISCONTINUED>                            0
               <EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
               <CHANGES>                                 0
               <NET-INCOME>                     (3,310,390)
               <EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.51)
               <EPS-DILUTED>                          (.47)
                       
               
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40091 USDC No. 9:96-CV-158

DARNELL JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

--------------------- October 7, 1997 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: Darnell Johnson, Texas prisoner #265926, requests a certificate of appealability (COA) from the district court’s denial of his federal habeas petition, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2254. Johnson contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel during his parole revocation proceedings. Johnson’s petition was filed on April 2, 1996, prior to the date of enactment of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). The Supreme Court recently held inO R D E R No. 97-40091 - 2 - Lindh v. Murphy , 117 S. Ct. 2059, 2067-68 (1997), that the AEDPA’s amendments to the habeas corpus statutes, which include the successive habeas provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244, apply only to cases filed after the AEDPA’s effective date of April 24, 1996. Accordingly, Johnson’s motion for a COA is construed as a request for a certificate of probable cause (CPC) and CPC is GRANTED. The case is VACATED and REMANDED to the district court for consideration of Johnson’s petition under pre-AEDPA standards. See Moran v. Stadler , ___ F.3d ___(5th Cir. September 8, 1997, No. 96-30892), 1997 WL 476407 at *1 (petition filed in the district court prior to the effective date of the AEDPA is not subject to the AEDPA’s successive habeas provisions). Johnson’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this court is GRANTED. COA GRANTED; IFP GRANTED; VACATED and REMANDED.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of T-3 Energy Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
J. Brading, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ STEVEN J. BRADING
------------------------------------
Steven J. Brading
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to T-3 Energy Services, Inc. and will be retained by T-3 Energy
Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.