alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998             OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,379                   1,432
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,403                  12,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     53,941                  66,338
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,323                  88,347
<PP&E>                                          18,450                  18,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,647                 142,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,333                  29,449
<BONDS>                                         46,998                  52,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             6                       5
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,452                  59,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,647                 142,082
<SALES>                                         38,526                 128,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,526                 128,647
<CGS>                                           23,637                  79,835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,671                  35,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 869                   3,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,349                   9,645
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,172                   4,631
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                177                   5,014
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       177                   5,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03                     .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03                     .92
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Holbron

16706

5/26/95

Denied

78 Hawai'i 422895 P.2d 173
August 23, 2006

27015

#### Aquarian Foundation v. Association of Apartment Owners of Waikiki Park Heights

Affirmed
#### Allosada v. TLA, Inc.

17089

5/08/96

Reversed
Exhibit 23.4

Consent of Independent Public Accountants

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Central Power and Light Company:

      As independent public accountants,  we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report with respect to the Consolidated  Financial  Statements of Central
Power and Light  Company  dated  February 25, 2000,  included in this Form 10-K,
into Central Power and Light Company's  previously filed registration  statement
on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-49577 and 33-52759).

Arthur Andersen LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 21, 2000




                                      4-25
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7464

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTWOYNE L. WYATT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:03-cr-00173-HEH-1)

Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antwoyne L. Wyatt, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller,

Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antwoyne L. Wyatt appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Wyatt, No. 3:03-cr-00173-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2013). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### WR-38,174-03 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 10/28/2015 2:53:24 PM Accepted 10/28/2015 3:05:26 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
18793

#### State v. Wong

Affirmed
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CESAR SAVIEL SALINAS

- TINOCO

,

Appellant,

v.

T HE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 31 0

- CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 7

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC# F

- 1222231

- Y )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter = s third request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter = s Record until February 23 , 201 4

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER = S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Sharon Hazlewood , Court Reporter for the Criminal District

Court No. 7 , for Dallas County, Texas, prepare the Reporter = s Record for the above styled and

numbered cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before February 23 , 2014

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12 th day of February, 2014

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
#### Duvauchelle v. Tides Foundation

22243

07/05/2001

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seen on Screen TV Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A-1 for the period ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Antoine Jarjour, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 8thday of April, 2009.

| | ANTOINE JARJOUR                                    
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Antoine Jarjour                                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer























---
June 8, 2004

25896

#### State v. Lameg

Affirmed
lmx10b




Consent of Attorney






	Randall J. Lanham
	Lanham and Associates
	28562 Oso Parkway, Unit D
	Rancho Santa Margarita, California 90505
	rjlanham@cox.net








	Lightning Marine, Inc.
	4045 Ensenada Avenue
	Miami, Florida 33133








RE: Form SB-1 of Lightning Marine, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about May 5, 2002 (“Form SB-1”).






Gentlemen,






     The undersigned hereby consents to the use of its name in the Form SB-1 and the use of my opinion of legality filed as an exhibit to the Form SB-1 Registration.






	Sincerely,
	 
	/S/ Randall J. Lanham
	Randall J. Lanham
	Lanham and Associates
	April 30, 2002








Page E-2






Page 48
22022

#### Konno v. County of Hawai'i

Affirmed
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 203 

Expressing support for designation of June 2015 as ‘‘National Men’s Cancer 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2015 

Mr. HASTINGS (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. 

KELLY of Illinois, Ms. MOORE, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. MURPHY of Florida, 

Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mrs. LAWRENCE, 

and Mr. PAYNE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of June 2015 as 

‘‘National Men’s Cancer Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas 1 in 2 men will be diagnosed with cancer over the 

course of their lifetimes; 

Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC), cancer claims the lives of nearly 

300,000 men annually in the United States; 

Whereas the CDC also reports that the incidence of cancer 

for men varies by race and ethnicity, with minority men 

having the highest cancer incidence and mortality rates; 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 203 IH 

Whereas statistics show that a higher percentage of men will 

die from cancer than women because they are typically 

diagnosed at a later stage; 

Whereas despite advances in medical technology and research, men continue to live an average of 5 fewer years 

compared to their female counterparts; 

Whereas ‘‘National Men’s Health Week’’, which is annually 

celebrated as the week leading up to, and including Father’s Day, was established in 1994 by the United States 

Congress, to show how simple diagnostic and screening 

tests can save lives; 

Whereas promoting awareness and education about men’s 

cancer is crucial to improving the health and well-being 

of men across the Nation, facilitating early detection, improving the prognoses of men who have been diagnosed 

with the disease, and ultimately preventing further loss of 

life; and 

Whereas June 2015 would be an appropriate month to designate as ‘‘National Men’s Cancer Awareness Month’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Men’s Cancer 

3 Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) encourages the Federal Government, States, 

5 localities, and nonprofit organizations to observance 

6 the month with appropriate awareness programs and 

7 educational activities, with the goal of increasing 

8 public knowledge of cancers disproportionately af9 fecting men; 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 203 IH 

1 (3) recognizes the profound toll a diagnosis of 

2 cancer has on men, families, and communities and 

3 pledges to make its prevention and cure a public 

4 health priority; and 

5 (4) urges public and private sector efforts to 

6 promote awareness, invest in research, and improve 

7 treatments for men’s cancers. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
DENIED and Opinion Filed July 27, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-23-00727-CV

IN RE EBBY WADE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 073026

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Breedlove

Opinion by Justice Breedlove

Before the Court is relator’s July 25, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus. 

Relator asks this Court to compel the trial court to rule on several pro se motions 

relator has filed in the trial court as well as any future motions he files. 

Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure in numerous respects. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1, 52.3(a)–(c), (d)(1)–(3), 

(f)–(h), (j), (k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1). Among other defects, the petition is not certified, 

see TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j), and the petition is not supported by a sufficient record or 

appendix, see TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1). Thus, relator’s petition does 

not meet the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for 
–2–

consideration of mandamus relief. See In re Jones, No. 05-23-00492-CV, No. 05-

23-00493-CV, 2023 WL 4101440, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 21, 2023, orig. 

proceeding) (mem. op.); see also In re Salinas, No. 05-23-00544-CV, No. 05-23-

00545-CV, 2023 WL 4101439, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 21, 2023, orig. 

proceeding) (mem. op.).

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

230727f.p05

/Maricela Breedlove/

MARICELA BREEDLOVE

JUSTICE
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 276 

Honoring the National Association of Women Business Owners on its 40th 

anniversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2015 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York (for herself and Mrs. BLACKBURN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the National Association of Women Business 

Owners on its 40th anniversary. 

Whereas women-owned businesses are one of the fastestgrowing segments of the United States economy; 

Whereas 13,600,000 firms are 50 percent or more owned by 

women, and these businesses employ nearly 15,900,000 

people and generate $2,700,000,000,000 in revenue as of 

2013; 

Whereas empowering more women entrepreneurs and business owners is important to the Nation’s economic future; 

Whereas the National Association of Women Business Owners (NAWBO) was established in 1975 by a group of 

like-minded businesswomen to serve as the collective voice 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 276 IH 

of women business owners across the country and advocate on behalf of their entrepreneurial interests; 

Whereas NAWBO’s roots are in public policy, and NAWBO 

played an integral role in the passage of H.R. 5050, the 

Women’s Business Ownership Act of 1988; 

Whereas NAWBO remains focused on collaborating to create 

a business-friendly environment at the national, State, 

and local levels to enable women to start and grow their 

businesses and create jobs; and 

Whereas NAWBO represents a diverse universe of women 

business owners across an array of sectors in the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives com2 mends the National Association of Women Business Own3 ers for its tireless efforts and decades of support of women 

4 entrepreneurs and business owners and congratulates the 

5 National Association of Women Business Owners on its 

6 40th anniversary. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
September 15, 2003

24841

#### State v. Cuntapay

Remanded
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 9, 2015

No. 04

- 14

- 00856

- CV

IN RE Ropal ANDERSON

, Gerald Busch and Hortencia Morales

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On January 7, 2015, the real party in interest filed an opposed motion to dismiss this

mandamus proceeding as moot. The relators and respondent may file a response to the

motion to dismiss in this court no later than January 16, 2015. Any such response must

conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED on January 9 th , 2015. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CI, styled In re Matthew Hileman , pending in the 288th Judicial

District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales presiding.
# EUR-Lex - 22000D1005(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22000D1005(01)

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 65/2000 of 2 August 2000 amending Annex VI (social security) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 250 , 05/10/2000 P. 0046 - 0047 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 65/2000

of 2 August 2000

amending Annex VI (social security) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as adjusted by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision No 11/2000 of the EEA Joint Committee of 28 January 2000(1).

(2) Decision No 173 of 9 December 1998 concerning the common arrangements adopted by the Member States, for the purposes of reimbursement between institutions following the introduction of the euro unit(2), adopted by the Administrative Commission of the European Communities on Social Security for Migrant Workers, is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be added after point 3.51 (Decision No 170) in Annex VI to the Agreement:

"3.52. 32000 D 0129(01): Decision No 173 of 9 December 1998 concerning the common arrangements adopted by the Member States, for the purposes of reimbursement between institutions following the introduction of the euro unit (OJ C 27, 29.1.2000, p. 21)."

Article 2

The texts of Decision No 173 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Communities, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 August 2000, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(3).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels, 2 August 2000.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

G. S. Gunnarsson

(1) Not yet published in the Official Journal.

(2) OJ C 27, 29.1.2000, p. 21.

(3) No constitutional requirements indicated.
Order entered September 17, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00585
- CV
GEORGE CHRISTIAN HER NANDEZ, Appellant
V. JOSE ANGEL CUELLAR, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 17
- 17647



### O RDER
The re porter’s record in this appeal has not been filed because appellant has not requested
it

. By letter dated August 10, 2018, we directed appellant to fil e written verification he had requested the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3 (c). Although we cautioned him that failure to comply could result in the appeal being submitted without the reporter’s record, he has not complied. Accordingly, we ORDER the ap peal submitted without the reporter’s record. See id. As the clerk’s record has been filed, we ORDER appellant to file his brief no later than October 16, 2018.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|Date:             |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|February 22, 2005 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | Marc. N. Teal              
|                  |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-1012 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-CE-037-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit 23(a)






                   Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers


The undersigned firm of Independent Petroleum Engineers, of Calgary, Alberta,
Canada, knows that it is named as having prepared an evaluation of the interests
of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd., dated March 15, 2002, prepared for filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001, and hereby gives its consent to the use of its name and to
the use of the said estimates.



                            Paddock Lindstrom & Associates Ltd.



                            /s/ L. K. Lindstrom
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            L. K. Lindstrom, P. Eng.
                                    President


<PAGE>
23112

#### State v. Fujimoto

Affirmed