alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Carol Johnson (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 16, 2021 - 9:12amI had tears in my eyes reading this article about the work the AOC employees do everyday and what the staff has done to restore the Capitol building and grounds since the attack. Your work is incredible!  You have each contributed to helping to settle our spirits by allowing us to see an image of a restored Capitol. This was so important to so many people. Thank you for your incredible efforts and your dedication to the job. Thank you for being proud of our Seat of Democracy and for treating it with the respect it deserves. Thank you for being some of America’s unsung heroes. God bless you all and keep you safe always!
Sincerely and with great respect,
Your fellow citizen
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-10-311-CR

RUBEN ELOY MARTINEZ APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant Ruben Eloy Martinez attempts to appeal from the trial court’s 

judgment sentencing him to twelve years’ confinement for possession with intent 

to deliver a controlled substance of four grams or more, but less than 200 grams, 

namely: cocaine. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Martinez’s sentence was imposed on June 2, 2010. Martinez filed a 

motion for new trial and a notice of appeal on July 21, 2010, even though they 

were due on July 2, 2010.2 See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). 

We sent notice to Martinez on August 4, 2010, stating that because of the 

apparent untimeliness of his notice of appeal, we would dismiss the appeal 

unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal responded by August 16, 

2010, and showed grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

9.2(b)(1)–(2). Martinez filed a response that did not show grounds for continuing 

the appeal.

The lack of a timely notice of appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction. See 

State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 410 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Slaton v. State, 981

S.W.2d 208, 209–10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Mays v. State, No. 02-07-00442-

CR, 2008 WL 820198, at *1 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth Mar. 27, 2008, pet. ref’d) 

(mem. op., not designated for publication). Therefore, because Martinez failed to 

timely file his notice of appeal in the proper location and failed to provide us with 

 

2Martinez sent his motion for new trial and his notice of appeal to the 

district attorney’s office on June 30, 2010, but they were not received by the 

district clerk’s office until July 21, 2010. Neither Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 25.2(c) nor Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.2 mentions anything 

about filing the notice of appeal with the district attorney’s office. Moreover, 

several cases hold that delivering the notice of appeal to the district attorney’s 

office does not constitute filing the notice of appeal with the proper authority. 

See Dean v. State, No. 06-10-00007-CR, 2010 WL 533071, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.–

–Texarkana Feb. 12, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); 

Snowden v. State, No. 04-99-00772-CR, 1999 WL 1261819, at *1 (Tex. App.––

San Antonio Dec. 29, 1999, no pet.) (not designated for publication).
3

grounds for continuing his appeal, we must dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 23, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
  By:
By:
    
    /s/ Brian E. Dearing

Brian E. DearingTitle:
    
    Chairman, President, ChiefExecutive Officer, and actingChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 116 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 116

Supporting the goals and ideals of International Mother Language Day in 
   bringing attention to the importance of preserving linguistic and 
                  cultural heritage through education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2015

Ms. Meng (for herself, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Honda, 
   Mr. Al Green of Texas, and Ms. Bordallo) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals and ideals of International Mother Language Day in 
   bringing attention to the importance of preserving linguistic and 
                  cultural heritage through education.

Whereas the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization 
        (UNESCO) established International Mother Language Day on November 17, 
        1999, to promote linguistic diversity and multilingualism;
Whereas the annual International Mother Language Day celebration date, February 
        21, was chosen to commemorate the day in 1952 in Bangladesh where 
        students died demonstrating for recognition of Bengali as a national 
        language of Pakistan;
Whereas UNESCO establishes a different theme for the annual celebration of 
        International Mother Language Day each year, promoting various aspects 
        of linguistic education;
Whereas according to the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger, out of 
        the over 6,000 existing languages in the world, more than 200 have 
        become extinct during the last three generations, and 2,279 other 
        languages are classified as ``endangered'';
Whereas the United States Census Bureau has identified at least 381 languages 
        spoken in the United States, 169 of which are distinct Native American 
        languages;
Whereas according to the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger, 145 
        languages in the United States are classified as ``endangered''; and
Whereas the United States enjoys a rich and diverse cultural heritage and 
        preserving existing languages is an essential piece to preserving this 
        heritage: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of International Mother 
        Language Day; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        International Mother Language Day with appropriate ceremonies, 
        programs, and activities.
                                 <all>
```
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Gordon, Appellant.

(No. 31755

Decided May 4, 1949.)

*Mr. Jackson Bosch,*prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

*Mr. J. Joseph Marr*and *Mr. Theodore l. Weiss,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Stewart, Turner and Taft, J J., concur.

Zimmerman, J., not participating.
Exhibit 21
Central And South West Corporation
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
As of December 31, 1998

Company Name                                       State or Jurisdiction
Business Conducted Under Same Name                 of Incorporation/Formation 


Central Power and Light Company                    Texas
539 North Carancahua Street
Corpus Christi, Texas 78401-2802

CPL Capital I                                      Delaware
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75202-1234

Public Service Company of Oklahoma                 Oklahoma
212 East 6th Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119-1212

PSO Capital I                                      Delaware
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75202-1234

Southwestern Electric Power Company                Delaware
428 Travis Street
Shreveport Louisiana 71156-0001

SWEPCO Capital I                                   Delaware
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75202-1234

West Texas Utilities Company                       Texas
301 Cypress Street
Abilene, Texas 79601-5820

SEEBOARD, plc                                      United Kingdom
Registered Office
Forest Gate, Brighton Road
Crawley, West Sussex RH11 9BH

Central and South West Services, Inc.              Texas
2 West Second Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103-3102
       and
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75202-1234

C3 Communications, Inc.                            Delaware
1705 South Capital of Texas Highway - Suite 400
Austin, Texas 78746

CSW Credit, Inc.                                   Delaware
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75202-1234

CSW Energy, Inc.                                   Texas
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75202-1234


                                      4-18
<PAGE>


Company Name                                       State or Jurisdiction
Business Conducted Under Same Name                 of Incorporation/Formation

CSW Energy Services, Inc.                          Texas
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75202-1234

CSW International, Inc.                            Delaware
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75202-1234

CSW Leasing, Inc.                                  Delaware
1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway
Dallas, Texas 75202-1234

EnerShop Inc.                                      Delaware
2777 Stemmons Freeway - Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75207-2214


                                      4-19
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12455Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Michael (not verified)PermalinkMay 17, 2023 - 12:37pmGreat stuff! Awesome to read about all the stuff you guys do! Keep it up!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
28682

#### Torres v. State

Affirmed
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                   AMENDMENT NUMBER FOURTEEN TO LOAN AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT to the Loan Agreement entered into as of October 4,
1993, between ARI NETWORK SERVICES, INC. ("ARI") and WITECH CORPORATION
("WITECH'), as amended (the "Loan Agreement"), is dated January 29, 1999.

                                   BACKGROUND

         This Amendment to the Loan Agreement reflects the mutual understanding
and agreement of the parties to amend the Loan Agreement regarding the provision
by WITECH of a revolving credit facility to ARI.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

         1. Subject to paragraph 4 below, the amount stated in Paragraph 2.2 of
the Loan Agreement shall be changed to Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000).

         2. Subject to paragraph 4 below, in Exhibit 1.1 to the Agreement, in
the definition of "Total Loan Commitment," the reference to "Two Million Eight
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,800,000)" is deleted and "Three Million Dollars
($3,000,000)" is substituted therefor.

         3. Subject to paragraph 4 below, in Exhibit 2.2(a), the reference to
"Two Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,800,000)" is deleted and "Three
Million Dollars ($3,000,000)" is substituted therefor.

         4. Any borrowings in excess of $2.0 million under the Loan Agreement
shall be repaid with the proceeds of any common stock offerings for cash (other
than pursuant to director or employee benefit plans or upon exercise of
outstanding warrants) by ARI. The $3.0 million amount referenced in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above shall be reduced by the amount of such proceeds (and the Loan
Agreement automatically amended accordingly); provided, however, the amount of
the reduction shall not exceed $1,000,000 (and, therefore, the availability
under the Loan Agreement shall not be reduced to less than $2.0 million).

         5. In consideration of the agreements by WITECH reflected in the
Amendment Number Fourteen, ARI shall issue to WITECH 100 additional shares of
Series A Preferred Stock, subject to Board of Directors approval of such
issuance.

         6. Subject to the amendments described herein, the Loan Agreement, as
amended, and associated documents and agreements remain in full force and
effect.







                                       2
<PAGE>   2

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed and delivered by their respective officers as of the date first
above written.

WITECH CORPORATION                                ARI NETWORK SERVICES, INC.



By:      Francis Brzezinski                  By:       Brian E. Dearing
   -----------------------------                 ------------------------------
   Francis Brzezinski, President                 Brian E. Dearing, Chairman,
                                                 President and Chief Executive
                                                 Officer










                                       3
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2015-2568

Docket Number

2014-SW-026-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM

Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB) No. 05.00.70, Revision 0, 

dated March 24, 2014; and

Airbus Helicopters EASB No. 05.00.62, Revision 0, dated March 24, 2014.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

 

I, John R. Howe, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of The Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:

 

1.   the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended February 1, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: April 10, 2014

 

 

68
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cagles, Inc. for the year ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and

2. The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  June 09, 2006          By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle

-----------------------------

J. Douglas Cagle

Chief Executive Officer























CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cagles, Inc. for the year ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and

2. The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  June 09, 2006          By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV

-----------------------------

Mark M. Ham IV

Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6559

HARVEY PATRICK SHORT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JUDGE JENNIFER BAILEY-WALKER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, 

Jr., District Judge. (2:09-cv-01096)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harvey Patrick Short, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Harvey Patrick Short appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Short v. Bailey-Walker, No. 2:09-

cv-01096 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 2010). Short’s motions for an 

order compelling the state court to adjudicate his state habeas 

corpus petition and for an omnibus habeas corpus hearing are 

denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.18

AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of September 1, 2005, to that Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2003 (the Agreement) by and between Michael Kahane (the Executive) and AMERICAN MEDIA
OPERATIONS, INC. (the Company).

Effective as of the date first written above, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1. Paragraph 1 a of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore:

The Contract Term shall be extended to April 17, 2008 on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Agreement.

2. Paragraph 6 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore:

Employee Benefits. During the Contract Term, Executive shall be provided, in accordance
with the terms of the Companys employee benefit plans as in effect from time to time, health insurance and short term and long term disability insurance, retirement benefits and fringe benefits (collectively Employee Benefits) on
the same basis as those benefits are generally made available to other similarly situated employees of the Company. Executive shall be provided with a Company vehicle. Executive will receive 30 PTO days per plan year (April 1stto March 31st), Unused PTO days may be carried over from year to year. Executive
will be permitted to fly business class on any flight over three hour long and shall book said flight(s) through Companys travel agent (if business class is not available on a certain route, first class travel will be permitted).

All other terms and conditions of Executives Employment Agreement and any subsequent amendments of that Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first written above.



AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC.By:

/s/ David Pecker

9/12/05Date/s/ Michael Kahane

9/13/05Michael Kahane

Date