alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.9

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OFCILCORP INC.
(required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of CILCORP Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Gary L. Rainwater, chief executive officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Form
10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of           the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 9, 2004

| |  | /s/ Gary L. Rainwater
Gary L. RainwaterChairman, President andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States      Code)**

|                                 |                                                                                             |                                              |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                August 14, 2007 | By:                                                                                    | /s/ Noah              Berkowitz, M.D., Ph.D. |
|                                 | Noah                Berkowitz, M.D., Ph.D.                                                       |
|                                 | President                and Chief Executive Officer(principal                executive officer) |

|                                 |                                                                       |                                   |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Date:                August 14, 2007 | By:                                                              | /s/ Jeffrey              P. Stein |
|                                 | Jeffrey              P. Stein, CPA                                         |
|                                 | (principal                financial and accounting                officer) |

----
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 Certifications

I, Jonathan S. Wood, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Chaparral Resources, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: March 15, 2004                       /s/ Jonathan S. Wood
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Jonathan S Wood
                                           Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CDI Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respect, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



By:

/s/    ROGER H. BALLOURoger H. Ballou President and Chief Executive Officer




Dated: March 29, 2005



By:

/s/    JAY G. STUARTJay G. Stuart Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




Dated: March 29, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CDI Corp. and
will be retained by CDI Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 163 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 24, 2015. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 27) establishing the 

budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2016 

and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 

2017 through 2025. The first reading of the concurrent resolution shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the concurrent resolution are waived. General 

debate shall not exceed four hours, with three hours of general debate confined to the congressional budget equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget and one hour of general 

debate on the subject of economic goals and policies equally 

divided and controlled by Representative Brady of Texas and 

Representative Carolyn Maloney of New York or their respective designees. After general debate the concurrent resolution 
2 

•HRES 163 EH 

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. The concurrent resolution shall be considered as read. 

No amendment shall be in order except those printed in the 

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, and shall 

be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent. All 

points of order against such amendments are waived. If more 

than one such amendment is adopted, then only the one receiving the greater number of affirmative votes shall be considered as finally adopted. In the case of a tie for the greater 

number of affirmative votes, then only the last amendment to 

receive that number of affirmative votes shall be considered 

as finally adopted. After the conclusion of consideration of 

the concurrent resolution for amendment and a final period 

of general debate, which shall not exceed 10 minutes equally 

divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

member of the Committee on the Budget, the Committee 

shall rise and report the concurrent resolution to the House 

with such amendment as may have been finally adopted. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution and amendments thereto to adoption without intervening motion except amendments offered by the 
3 

•HRES 163 EH 

chair of the Committee on the Budget pursuant to section 

305(a)(5) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to achieve 

mathematical consistency. The concurrent resolution shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question of its 

adoption. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### Kyle JOHNSON, Kim A. Harris, and Robert Lapp, Appellants (Defendants below), v. Harry HAUFFE, Gene Bachmeier, Roy Putnam, and Ed Mintun, Appellees (Defendants below).

No. 4713.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Aug. 9, 1977.

H. R. Obert, Billings, Mont., for appellants.

Harry E. Leimback and David B. Park, Casper, for appellees.

Before GUTHRIE, C. J., and McCLIN-TOCK, RAPER, THOMAS and ROSE, JJ.

*736PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek reversal of a judgment denying them damages for injuries sustained during an altercation in a bar. Their notice of appeal was not timely, and we must dismiss this appeal by virtue of our rules and prior decisions.

The judgment and decree herein were filed on February 5,1976; motions for new trial and to alter or amend judgment also were filed that day. According to Rule 73(a), W.R.C.P., the running of the time for appeal was then suspended until the entry of an order granting or denying these motions. Rule 59, W.R.C.P., under which these motions were filed, provides that if either of these kinds of motions is not determined within 60 days after entry of judgment it shall be deemed denied, unless within the 60 days the determination is continued by order of the court or by stipulation. No such order or stipulation has been discovered in the record herein, and none is listed in the copy of the district court docket. Sixty days after the entry of judgment was April 5,1976. The running of the time for appeal commenced on that date and would have terminated 30 days later, on May 5, 1976. See *Sun Land & Cattle Co. v. Brown,*Wyo., 387 P.2d 1004; *McMullen v. McMullen,*Wyo., 559 P.2d 37, 38; cf. *Brasel and Sims Construction Co. v. Neuman Transit Co.,*Wyo., 378 P.2d 501, 503. Appellants’ notice of appeal was not filed until May 10. A written order denying the motions had been entered on April 12, after the motions were deemed denied. The entry of a written order denying Rule 59 motions after they have been deemed denied does not extend the time for appeal, absent stipulation and court order. The failure to file a timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional, *McMullen v. McMullen, supra; Sun Land & Cattle Co. v. Brown, supra.*

Appellees have moved for an award of costs and attorney’s fees on appeal. Because this is proper only in aggravated cases we hesitate to impose such penalties, *Keller v. Anderson,*Wyo., 554 P.2d 1253. Ordinarily this might be determined by an examination of appellants’ presentation in determining whether it would be proper to make such award. However, because ap-pellees herein failed to raise or argue the dispositive issue in the appeal, i. e., timeliness of the notice of appeal, we will not apply this practice herein. Appellees could have saved considerable time for themselves and for the judicial system if, instead of pursuing a response to the appeal on issues which we cannot reach, they would have asserted this crucial jurisdictional issue. Appellees’ expenses and attorney’s fees would have been demonstrably less had this been called to the court’s attention immediately upon the filing of this defective notice. The motion for costs, attorney’s fees, and expenses is denied.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF MFC BANCORP LTD.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        JURISDICTION OF         SHAREHOLDERS
NAME                                     INCORPORATION            YEAR END
----                                    ---------------         ------------

<S>                                     <C>                     <C>
MFC Merchant Bank S.A.                    Switzerland               100%

Constitution Insurance Company
  of Canada                                 Canada                  100%

MFC Commodities GmbH                        Austria                  95%

TriMaine Holdings, Inc.                      U.S.A.                  83%

Trimble Resources Corporation           Turks & Caicos
                                            Islands                 100%

Drummond Financial Corporation               U.S.A.                  96%

Eurotrade & Forfaiting Inc.                  U.S.A.                  93%

Banff Resources Ltd.                         Yukon                   85%

MFC Aluminiumfolie Merseburg GmbH           Germany                 100%

</TABLE>
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12669Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Marty Shore (not verified)PermalinkSeptember 13, 2023 - 6:46pmCongratulations Edmund!! Fantastic. I’ll have to make a visit there!!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
21180

#### State v. Jaeger

Affirmed
July 31, 1998

20737

#### State v. Anaya

Affirmed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0240 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JASON RALPH EBY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, Court Reporter Debra S. Kambel is granted an extension of time to and including October 28, 2022 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2022

09/13/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0240
#### Emerson Coat Co., Inc., Respondent-Appellant, *v.*Becker Cloak Company, Respondent, and Bee-Bee Holding Corp., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

May 21, 1959.

*879
      *George T. Nicholson*and *William P. Kennedy*for appellant.

*Martin Rosen*for respondent-appellant.

No one appearing for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The finding in favor of the defendant Becker Cloak Company on disputed testimony may not be disturbed. There was, however, no proof of the cause of the water overflow, or of notice, actual or constructive, to the landlord-owner of any condition for which it could he held liable. In the absence of such proof there is no basis for recovery. *(Hirsch*v. *Radt,*228 N. Y. 100; *De Clara*v. *Barber S. S. Lines,*309 N. Y. 620, 630; *Buria*v. *Rosedale Eng. Corp.,*7 A D 2d 486.)

On appeal of defendant Bee-Bee Holding Corp., judgment should be reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

On appeal of plaintiff, judgment should be affirmed, without costs.

Concur — Hofstadtbr, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.
" , ,; )\j •• 

Memorandum 

u.s. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Subject: Request for Extension at Joplin (DOT-OST-2006- Date: 

23932) and Fort Leonard Woo!i (DOT-OST-1996-1167), 

jouri . d, J!1 1/ . '...I2--J,vn .. t.{) • I/-Q f/c7 

From: 

EAS 

ennis 

& 

J. 

Domestic 

De ny, 

Analysis 

Chief 

Division, 

~ X-53 

To: Dockets Operations, M-30 

Reply to 

Attn. of: 

July 16,2010 

Kevin Schlemmer, 

X-53 Ext. 63176 

Order 2010-6-9, June 8, 2010, requested proposals for Essential Air Service (EAS) at 

Joplin and Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, to be submitted by July 15. 

On July 15, the Department received a request for an extension from American Eagle 

Airlines (American Eagle) to extend the submission deadline to July 23. 

We are hereby granting the extension based on American Eagle's request. Proposals for 

Joplin and Fort Leonard Wood are now due no later than Friday, July 23,2010.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Christopher Anzalone, Chief Executive Officer of Arrowhead Research Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule
13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                            
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2010 |  |  |  |                            
|                   |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | /s/    CHRISTOPHER ANZALONE
|                   |  |  |  | Christopher Anzalone       
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer    

A signed original of these written statements required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Arrowhead Research Corporation
and will be retained by Arrowhead Research Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## ATTACHMENT C

**Safer Choice Program: Form for Adding Third -**  **Party Partners and Products (Private Label Companies, Licensees, or Toll Manufacturers)** 

**OMB Control No. 2070 -**  **0178 Approval expires XX/XX/XX**  The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 29.5 hours per response for formulators of cleaning and non
- cleaning products and 9.5 hours per response for partners wishing to add third
- party partners and products, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering information, and completing and reviewing the application. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any corres pondence. Do not send the completed application to this address.


### Note that this form will be incorporated into the Salesforce system in the coming months. The fields in the online form in Salesforce will be identical to the PDF form. Until this part o f the system is fully incorporated, the Agency will continue to use this PDF application form.
December 11, 1998

21531

#### State v. Jones

Affirmed