alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Millie Havard (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 16, 2021 - 4:56amThank you for all you do.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER ADOPTING RULE 405 OF THE

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF JUVENILE

COURT PROCEDURE :

:

:

:

: NO. 959

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11 th day of September , 202 3 , upon the recommendation of the

Juvenile Court Procedural Rules Committee

, the proposal having been published for

public comment at 52 Pa.B. 7266 (November 26, 2022) :

I t is O rdered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania

tha t P en nsylvania Rule of Juvenile Court Procedure 405 is adopted in the attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. 103(b), and shall be

effective on January 1 , 202 4

.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply614Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Joan Wynant (not verified)PermalinkJune 21, 2022 - 12:34pmBravo! Another immigrant success story and some very interesting restoration details. My one request: Is it possible to add one more photo to the article? I’d like to see a close-up shot of just one tile as Guastavino would have seen it. We can’t see it for ourselves while visiting the building nor can we see it in the story.  What a plus this would be.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply623Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Cori Wright (n... (not verified)PermalinkMay 14, 2019 - 10:09amThis is a great article, but I wish it would have mentioned the fact that Roberto Duglio restored the painting.  It was in bad shape when uncovered and could not have been left uncovered without restoration.  Roberto is a very talented decorative painter and artist.  In the article, it just has him captioned as an unnamed ‚ÄúAOC painter‚Äù.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
23397

#### State v. Hayashi

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000879465
<NAME>                        TADEO HOLDINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         555,137
<SECURITIES>                                   2,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  158,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,218,269
<PP&E>                                         120,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                 41,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,371,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,461,569
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    505,000
<COMMON>                                       1,504
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,636,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,371,806
<SALES>                                        1,303,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,303,310
<CGS>                                          575,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  575,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,013,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,013,125)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,013,125)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.07)
        


</TABLE>
#### Hijos De Daniel Espuny, S. A., Plaintiff, *v.*B. Dorman & Sons, Inc., Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Hijos De Daniel Espuny, S. A., Plaintiff, *v.*Victor M. Calderon Co., Inc., et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

April 9, 1959.

*586*Caras, Cohen & Koch*for plaintiff.

*Jack Borman for*B. Dorman & Sons, Inc., defendant.

*Permut é Badillo*for Victor M. Calderon Co., Inc., defendant.

James S. Brown, J.

Motion by plaintiff to consolidate two actions, both of which were instituted by the movant.

In Action No. 1 the complaint contains several causes of action against the sole defendant therein, B. Dorman & Sons, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Dorman, for alleged breach of contract, fraud and conspiracy. The fifth cause of action therein alleges that Victor M. Calderon Co., Inc., hereinafter referred to as the Calderon Company, was the broker in the contract between the plaintiff and Dorman and also the agent for plaintiff and Dorman, and that the said Calderon Company and Victor M. Calderon and Jose M. Calderon conspired with Dorman to cause Dorman to breach its contract with the plaintiff.

Action No. 2 is brought against the said Calderon Company and the said two individual Calderons and the complaint therein reiterates that the Calderon Company was the broker in the said contract and prepared the said contract and caused Dorman to breach it and conspired to defraud the plaintiff by causing the plaintiff to purchase soya bean oil at a price in excess of the market price; and agreeing among themselves and with Dorman not to purchase olive oil as agreed to in the contract between the plaintiff and Dorman and by preventing Dorman from completing its contract.

Defendants in both actions object to any consolidation or a joint trial on the ground it would prejudice them and on the further ground that neither of the actions has any facts or ground in common and that the facts in the action against Dorman are highly complex and the documentation is voluminous.

A reading of the papers in opposition to the motion does not substantiate the claims of defendants that any substantial right would be prejudiced. On the other hand, because of the nature of the actions, and the fact that the defendants in both actions were parties to the negotiations terminating in the contract, or were brokers, or agents of the plaintiff and Dorman, and are charged with conspiring to defraud plaintiff by inducing plaintiff’s consent to the contract and preventing Dorman from fulfilling its obligations under the contract, it would appear that a single trial will be in the best interests of all parties since one judge will be trying both actions and will have the benefit of observing the parties and weighing their testimony. The claim that the facts are highly complex and the documentation volumi*587nous is a reason for consolidation rather than denial thereof, since the actions are to be tried without a jury and the trial judge will have no difficulty in analyzing and evaluating same.

The motion for consolidation is granted.

Settle order on notice.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-60353 Summary Calendar

DAVID GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DAVID TURNER, Superintendent Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution; MICHAEL BERNHARDT, Captain, Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution; HUBERT JORDAN, Lieutenant, Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution; JERRY WALLY, Lieutenant, Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution; JACKIE LANCASTER, Lieutenant, Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution; RANDY ANDERSON, Lieutenant, Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution; ARTIS BYRD, Sergeant, Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution; ANDREW MILLS; ANN REID, Case Manager; SHELIA FANCHER, Deputy Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2-99-CV-64-PC

- - - - - - - - - - November 2, 2000 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * David Gray, Mississippi prisoner # 01440, appeals from the magistrate judge’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaintNo. 00-60353 -2- for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Gray alleges that the defendants retaliated against him for filing a prior civil action. A dismissal of an in forma pauperis complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) is reviewed de

novo . See Black v. Warren , 134 F.3d 732, 734 (5th Cir. 1998). To establish a claim of retaliation, a prisoner must show “(1) a specific constitutional right, (2) the defendant’s intent to retaliate against the prisoner for his or her exercise of that right, (3) a retaliatory adverse act, and (4) causation.” McDonald v. Steward , 132 F.3d 225, 231 (5th Cir. 1998). Gray has failed to allege more than his personal belief that he is the victim of retaliation. Johnson v. Rodriguez , 110 F.3d 299, 310 (5th Cir. 1997). Because Gray has failed to state a valid claim for retaliation, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 127 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 127

 Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, the contributions of 
  these brave men and women who protect public safety, and expressing 
  support for the designation of March 31, 2015, as National Lineman 
                           Appreciation Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2015

Mr. Mulvaney submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, the contributions of 
  these brave men and women who protect public safety, and expressing 
  support for the designation of March 31, 2015, as National Lineman 
                           Appreciation Day.

Whereas the profession of linemen is steeped in personal, family, and 
        professional tradition;
Whereas linemen are often first responders during storms and other catastrophic 
        events, working to make the scene safe for other public safety heroes;
Whereas linemen must work high atop powerlines 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, 
        to keep electricity flowing;
Whereas linemen play a vital role in the Nation's economy by maintaining and 
        growing the energy infrastructure of the United States;
Whereas linemen must often work under dangerous conditions separated from their 
        families to keep schools and businesses open;
Whereas linemen put their lives on the line every day with little recognition 
        from the community regarding the danger of their work; and
Whereas March 31, 2015, would be an appropriate date to designate as National 
        Lineman Appreciation Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the efforts of linemen in keeping the power 
        on and protecting public safety; and
            (2) supports the designation of National Lineman 
        Appreciation Day.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                         CHATTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         ------------------------------
                 SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                                 (In thousands)



<TABLE><CAPTION>
                                                                         Charged
                                            Balance at    Charged to     to Other                    Balance at
                                            Beginning     Costs and      Accounts      Accounts        End of
                                            of Period      Expenses      Describe     Written off      Period
                                            ---------      --------      --------     -----------      ------
<S>                                         <C>            <C>           <C>          <C>             <C>
Year ended November 30, 2000:
  Reserves deducted from asset accounts:
     Allowance for doubtful accounts          $  900        $1,237        $  --         $1,112         $1,025

Year ended November 30, 2001:
  Reserves deducted from asset accounts:
     Allowance for doubtful accounts          $1,025        $  533        $  --         $1,058         $  500

Year ended November 30, 2002:
  Reserves deducted from asset accounts:
     Allowances for doubtful accounts         $  500        $1,537        $  --         $1,075         $  962
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 226 (Monday, November 27, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 82817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25858]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 54

[WC Docket Nos. 10-90, 14-58, 09-197, and 16-271; RM-11868; Report No. 
3203; FR ID 183017]


Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petition for Reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Petitions for Reconsideration (Petitions) have been filed in 
the Commission's proceeding Connect America Fund: A National Broadband 
Plan for Our Future High-Cost Universal Service Support, ETC Annual 
Reports and Certifications, Telecommunications Carriers Eligible to 
Receive Universal Service Support, Connect America Fund--Alaska Plan, 
and Expanding Broadband Service Through the ACAM Program.

DATES: Oppositions to the Petitions must be filed on or before December 
12, 2023. Replies to oppositions must be filed on or before December 
22, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information on this 
proceeding, contact Stephen Wang of the Wireline Competition Bureau, 
Telecommunications Access Policy Division, at (202) 418-7400 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f5c7b6a7f676a6121586e61684f696c6c21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f2c0b1a0f171a1151281e11183f191c1c51181009">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
document, Report No. 3203, released October 31, 2023. The full text of 
the Petitions can be accessed online via the Commission's Electronic 
Comment Filing System at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission 
will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress 
or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(1)(A), because no rules are being adopted by the Commission.
    Subject: Connect America Fund: A National Broadband Plan for Our 
Future High-Cost Universal Service Support (WC Docket Nos. 10-90, 14-
58, 09-197, and 16-271; RM-11868).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 5.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-25858 Filed 11-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements on FormS-3 and in the related Prospectuses and in the following Registration Statements on Form S-8 ofCentex Corporation and Subsidiaries:       Form S-3 Registration No. 333-54722 Form S-8 Registration No. 33-55083  Registration No. 333-54722-01   Registration No. 33-55083-01  Registration No. 333-54722-02   Registration No. 33-55083-02  Registration No. 333-117470   Registration No. 333-28229  Registration No. 333-117470-01   Registration No. 333-28229-01  Registration No. 333-117470-02   Registration No. 333-28229-02      Registration No. 333-55717      Registration No. 333-55717-01      Registration No. 333-55717-02      Registration No. 333-74185      Registration No. 333-74185-01      Registration No. 333-74185-02      Registration No. 333-86041      Registration No. 333-86041-01      Registration No. 333-86041-02      Registration No. 333-37956      Registration No. 333-68790      Registration No. 333-68790-01      Registration No. 333-68790-02      Registration No. 333-100682      Registration No. 333-100682-01      Registration No. 333-100682-02      Registration No. 333-103440      Registration No. 333-103440-01      Registration No. 333-103440-02      Registration No. 333-107701      Registration No. 333-107701-01      Registration No. 333-107701-02      Registration No. 333-109869      Registration No. 333-109869-01      Registration No. 333-109869-02      Registration No. 333-110269      Registration No. 333-110269-01      Registration No. 333-110269-02      Registration No. 33-44575of our reports dated May 21, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofCentex Corporation and Subsidiaries, Centex Corporation and Subsidiaries management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Centex Corporation and Subsidiaries, included in this AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2007.         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP         Dallas, Texas