alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12444Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  MICHAEL J. LILLY (not verified)PermalinkMay 4, 2023 - 4:48pmA great article to not only read but think about how my life could fit into this mold. I am a retired pipefitter and worked in paper making plants, college storage units, many medical facilities.  All of these needed to control moistures and tempture at the same time. Dufault                             to maintain.  Thank You.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                           Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DynTek, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge and upon a review of the Report that:

(1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Financial Officer, my own due diligence and representations made by
certain members of the Company's senior management.



Dated: February 17, 2004                /s/ Steven J. Ross
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven J. Ross
                                        Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-4773

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ZARINA HAFIZUDDIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-95-9-L,

CA-96-1423-L)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 3, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Wilmer Christopher, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. John Francis Purcell, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and

jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)). In a criminal case, a defendant has ten days

within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from

judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). The district court

may, upon a showing of excusable neglect, extend by thirty days the

time for filing a notice of appeal. See United States v. Reyes, 759

F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 857 (1985).

The district court entered its order on May 26, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on Sept. 17, 1996. Appellant's

failure to note an appeal within the ten-day appeal period and the

thirty-day permissible extension period leaves this court without

jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We

therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
MANAGER)


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
undersigned, Kathleen A. Hill, President and Chief Operating Officer (Principal
Financial Manager) of Nutrition Management Services Company, a Pennsylvania
corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to her knowledge,
that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 of the
Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Kathleen
      A. HillKathleen
      A. HillPresident
      and Chief Operating Officer(Principal
      Financial Manager)




Date: 
May 15, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2066

IN RE: CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL-BEY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 (5:13-hc-02090-BO)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Alonzo Tunstall-Bey, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Alonzo Tunstall-Bey petitions for a writ of 

mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to direct 

prison officials to release the log of incoming and outgoing 

legal mail and directing the district court to provide photocopy 

services. We conclude that Tunstall-Bey is not entitled to 

mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only 

in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 

U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 

516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available 

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. 

In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 

1988). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In 

re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).

The relief sought by Tunstall-Bey is not available by way 

of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                             501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       77
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         13
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   580
<PP&E>                                             664
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (177)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              214
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,484
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,595
<SALES>                                            255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   255
<CGS>                                              115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (704)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Mario Patterson, * From the 259th District Court

of Jones County,

 Trial Court No. 023532.

Vs. No. 11-15-00093-CV * June 2, 2017

Ronald Fox et al., * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
June 8, 2005

25144

#### Anderson v. Douglas

Vacated
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 129 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 129

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 27, 2015.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 35) making further 
continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2015, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against consideration of the joint resolution are waived. The 
joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions in the joint resolution are waived. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
September 28, 2004

26393

#### State v. Helemano

Vacated and Remanded
Slip Op. 99 - 13

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: RICHARD W. GOLDBERG, JUDGE


JEFFREY S. BELL,
Plaintiff,

v. Court No. 92-11-00764

UNITED STATES,

Defendant.



JUDGMENT ORDER
On November 12, 1993, the Court remanded the above-captioned action to Customs so that plaintiff might present additional evidence pertaining to the denial of his application for a customs broker license. See Jeffrey S. Bell v. United States , 17 CIT 1220 (1993). On May 3, 1994, upon Order of the Court, the parties then advised that the Secretary of the Treasury had granted Mr. Bell’s appeal of the denial of his license application and that theparties intended to file a stipulation to dismiss the abovecaptioned action pursuant to USCIT R. 41(a)(1)(B).
Having subsequently failed to submit any papers whatsoever, the Court issued an Order on December 7, 1998, requiring that plaintiff in the above-captioned action show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court’s show cause Order. Defendant responded in a letter to the Court on January 20, 1998, indicating that it had been unable to locate counsel for plaintiff. Upon consideration of plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Order to show cause; upon all other papers and proceedings had herein, and upon due deliberation, it is herebyORDERED that above-captioned action is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

SO ORDERED.

JUDGE

Date: January 29, 1999 New York, New York
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jonathan S Wood , Chief Financial Officer of Chaparral Resources, Inc. (the
"company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1.   The company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
          31, 2003 ("Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

     2.   All of the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the company.



Date: March 15, 2004                          /s/ Jonathan S Wood
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Jonathan S. Wood
                                              Chief Financial Officer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply531Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  MICHAEL J LILL... (not verified)PermalinkMay 15, 2018 - 4:19pmFrom a retired construction project manager, prior as Pipefitter, Plumber, I appreciate the talent needed to continue maintain the systems today.  Times have changed the equipment and maybe the function but the experience from the field mechanic to keep everything running is a very difficult job.  The 80 years in the HVAC industry has made me realize the importance of on-site and education has made our trade the #1 in construction.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Thomas J. CRIDER, Appellant, v. ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 20633.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 21, 1963.

Max Pope, J. Terry Huffstutler, Birmingham, Ala., for appellant.

Foster Etheredge, Birmingham, Ala., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and JOHNSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the question presented on this appeal is controlled by Green v. J. A. Jones Const. Co., 5th Cir. 1947, 161 F.2d 359. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
MOAB /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 27, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00096

- CV

ALS 88 DESIGN BUILD, LLC

, Appellant

v.

MOAB CONSTRUCTION

, Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 03033

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant’s Emergency Motion to Stay Jur y Trial is DENIED.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of February, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 9 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk October 9 , 2019

1 60120 ( 43 )

MARY ELIZABETH ZELASKO

,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 160120

v COA: 342854

Oakland CC: 2011

- 788549

- DM

RICHARD ANTHONY ZELASKO

,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time for

filing her answer is GRANTED. The answer submitted on Octo ber 1 , 2019 , is accepted as

timely filed

.
December 22, 2005

26102

#### Mendoza v. State

Affirmed
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Farm Service Agency

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 2:00 P.M. CT February 24, 2017

U.S.D.A.’s Farm Service Agency today announced the sale of cotton. The cotton bales were sold under Announcement SMAC3, Invitation No. 1 dated February 13,

2017.

Catalog 

Lot No Catalog Company Location Purchaser Pounds Sold

Bid Price

(per Pound) CCC Revenue

1 Eloy, AZ Toyoshima (USA), Inc. 3,696 $.615 $2,273.06

2 Eloy, AZ Toyoshima (USA), Inc. 3,248 $.605 $1,965.07

3 Eloy, AZ Toyoshima (USA), Inc. 460 $.565 $259.90

4 Eloy, AZ Toyoshima (USA), Inc. 40,665 $.570 $23,179.05

5 Eloy, AZ Toyoshima (USA), Inc. 26,049 $.565 $14,717.79

6 Eloy, AZ Toyoshima (USA), Inc. 41,076 $.560 $23,002.56

7 Eloy, AZ Toyoshima (USA), Inc. 3,760 $.555 $2,086.81

8 Eloy, AZ Toyoshima (USA), Inc. 40,482 $.585 $23,682.15

9 Eloy, AZ Toyoshima (USA), Inc. 12,460 $.585 $7,289.16

10 Eloy, AZ Toyoshima (USA), Inc. 34,256 $.555 $19,012.24

Totals 206,152 $117,467.79
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT









|1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2023 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as seller, servicer (in
            such capacity, the “Servicer”), administrator and custodian, U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as indenture trustee, BMW FS Securities LLC, as depositor, and BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2023-A, as issuer, and I have made, or have
            caused to be made under my supervision, a review of the activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the period from July 18, 2023 to December 31, 2023; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. | to the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2 above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during
            the period from July 18, 2023 to December 31, 2023.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  March 26, 2024




By:  /s/ Ole
        Jensen


Name:  Ole Jensen


Title:  Vice
      President – Finance & Chief Financial Officer