alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly
Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”),
I, John A. Hardy, Executive Chairman of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |                                              
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 15,  2011 | /s/ John A. Hardy                            
|                        | John A. Hardy
        Chief Executive Officer
27647

#### State v. Gonzalez

Vacated and Remanded
24019

#### State v. Rodenhurst

Affirmed
### C^^^q^J2!2)QM9^— 1 MAY 26 2 Jbg^D^^-^OtoS 1^"^
— CLERK
vs.



### ^_Z ZBZ — . x_______^^^ pgfrcV^. ^W rff 0«m*sA WrW* mVrVA\n, -,aA^

V*£«>dooh--. •a&rft-Q'boiA. . — 31 

### _I_j__xWt_^^ rr Yr, Vn .V nVn, oW^nA «*W_> - rOsL_ _0_l____^^^

### |;4^ 3oJ5

'^

____2g^J^^ ^/t__ 

# ^e^i^-^^^r2^- —*—^8fTM% _Q^ ££- iiiJ&sJfofi— ^ ^ 3" ^rftrv y^N^^rA ^\inrtf.y's ^^V^*^^^^ CWcnWA ;5W^ ^ ,__==f^o^^o^mApcpA31S3QE. VVJt-bi^wo
EXHIBIT 11
                             LASERSIGHT INCORPORATED
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                  NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND 1999


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months Ended                      Nine Months Ended
                                                           September 30,                          September 30,
                                                        2000             1999               2000                1999
                                                        ----             ----               ----                ----
<S>                                                 <C>               <C>               <C>                  <C>
BASIC AND DILUTED

  Weighted average shares outstanding               21,689,000        17,455,000         20,420,000          15,691,000
                                                  ============      ============       ============        ============

  Net loss                                        $ (4,517,190)       (3,022,500)        (9,391,002)         (9,793,526)
                                                  ============      ============       ============        ============

  Basic loss per share                            $      (0.21)            (0.17)             (0.46)              (0.62)
                                                  ============      ============       ============        ============

ADDITIONAL DILUTED CALCULATION

  Net loss, above                                 $ (4,517,190)       (3,022,500)        (9,391,002)         (9,793,526)
                                                  ============      ============       ============        ============

  Additional adjustment to weighted
   average number of shares:
  Weighted average shares outstanding,
   above                                            21,689,000        17,455,000         20,420,000          15,691,000
  Dilutive effect of contingently issuable
   shares, stock options and convertible
   preferred stock                                   2,236,000         5,646,000          3,771,000           5,566,000
                                                  ------------      ------------       ------------        ------------
  Weighted average number of shares,
   adjusted                                         23,925,000        23,101,000         24,191,000          21,257,000
                                                  ============      ============       ============        ============

  Diluted loss per share, adjusted (A)            $      (0.19)            (0.13)             (0.39)              (0.46)
                                                  ============      ============       ============        ============


(A) This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item
    601(b)(11) although it is contrary to paragraph 13-14 of SFAS 128
    because it produces an anti-dilutive result.

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of infoUSA Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, (i) this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company**.**   Date: November 9, 2004 */s/ Raj Das*
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Gus D. Halas, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of T-3 EnergyServices, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(d) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and (e) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         By:  */*s/ GUS D. HALAS    Gus D. Halas    Chief Executive Officer    July 30, 2004
[Cite as In re Jackson , 2024
- Ohio
- 1525.]



## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY
IN THE MATTER OF: THE GUARDIANSHIP OF MCCALTER JACKSON, JR. CASE NO. 2024 - T - 0026

Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas , Probate Division

Trial Court No. 2013 GDP 0084

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Decided: April 22, 2024 Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Christopher R. Patrick

, Roth, Blair, Roberts, Strasfeld & Lodge , 100 East Federal Street, Suite 600, Youngstown, OH 44503 (For Appellant). Charles A.J. Strader

, Attorney Charles Strader , LLC, 175 Franklin Street, S.E., Warren, OH 44481 (For Appellee, Stephanie J. Moss

- Jackson).
Joshua M. Garris , 1371 Church Street, Mineral Ridge, OH 44440 (Appellee).

ROBERT J. PATTON, J. {¶1} On March 15, 202 4 , appellant, Brenda Kimble, through counsel, filed an appeal from a February 12, 2024 judgment entry. {¶2} App.R. 3(A) expressly states that the only jurisdictional requirement for filing a valid appeal is to file it within the time allowed by App.R. 4. The Supreme Court has held that the failure to comply with the time requirements of App.R. 4(A) is a jurisdi ctional2

Case No. 2024

- T

- 0026 defect, which is fatal to an appeal. In re H.F. , 120 Ohio St.3d 499, 2008

- Ohio

- 6810, ¶ 17, citing State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections , 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60 (1988 ). {¶3} “Subject to the provisions of App.R. 4(A)(3), a party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.” See App.R. 4(A)(1). Civ.R. 58(B) directs the clerk of courts to serve the parties with notice of the entry within three days of entering the judgment upon the journal. If Civ.R. 58(B ) service does not occur within three days, the time to appeal does not begin to run until service is made and noted in the a ppearance docket. Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. , 163 Ohio App.3d 659, 664, 2005

- Ohio

- 5360. {¶4} Here, the trial court issued its entry on February 12, 2024. The clerk of courts noted on the appearance docket that notice of the entry under Civ.R. 58(B) was issued to the parties on that same date. Therefore, pursuant Civ.R. 58(B), the time to appeal began to run from February 12, 2024. The deadline for appellant to file h er notice of appeal was March 13, 2024, which was not a holiday or a weekend. Thus, appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed by 2 days. {¶5} This court is not empowered to extend the time deadline in civil cases. Pendell , supra at 60; see also App.R. 14(B). {¶6} Based upon the foregoing, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1).

MARY JANE TRAPP, J. , MATT LYNCH, J. ,
concur

.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ALAN VITULI                                  
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|March 9, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FISCAL
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                           1,792
<SECURITIES>                                       115
<RECEIVABLES>                                      381
<ALLOWANCES>                                        40
<INVENTORY>                                      1,130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,441
<PP&E>                                             664
<DEPRECIATION>                                     537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              597
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         3,128
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,965
<SALES>                                          3,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,900
<CGS>                                            2,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (773)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (773)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.25)










        

</TABLE>
From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject: Lowry, Nick (OST) Thursday, February 14, 2013 1:49 PM Don Hainbach (dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com); Erin Tallardy (etallardy@ggh-airlaw.com) B. Edelman (bedelman@hbs.edu); Podberesky, Samuel (OST); Graber, Kimberly (OST); Dockets Mail B. Edelman v. British Airways Pic, Dkt DOT-OST-2013-0025
This notice is In reference your motion of February 11, 2013. By a motion dated February 11, 2013, Counsel for British Airways, Pic, requested al") extension of time in which to prepare an answer in the above-referenced third-party complaint to March 22, 2013. The Respondent's motion advises thatthe Complainantwas contacted and has no objection to grantofthe request. 

### This office has decided to grantfor good cause the requested extension. This notice is issued under authority assigned in 14CFR 302.405(a). Noteto Dockets: Please place this e-mail in Dkt DOT-OST-2013-0025.

Nicholas Lowry SeniorAttorney Office ofAviationEnforcement& 

### Proceedings Office ofthe General Counsel U.S. Dept. ofTransportation 202-366-9351 (ph)

1
19368

#### State v. Ransdell

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seen on Screen TV Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Antoine Jarjour, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 13th day of July, 2012.








ANTOINE JARJOURAntoine JarjourChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### State v. Maelega

25226

04/26/2004

Vacated & remanded
#### State v. Bolosan.

15993

6/6/94

Denied

- P.2d-
26947

#### Norwest Bank Minnesota v. Failauga

Affirmed
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6052

JONATHAN ELWOOD WALKER, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOSEPH B. HALL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. L. Patrick Auld, 

Magistrate Judge. (1:11-cv-00128-LPA)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Elwood Walker, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Babb, 

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Clarence 

Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Elwood Walker, Sr., seeks to appeal the magistrate 

judge’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition.*

 The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Walker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

Walker’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave 

 * This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the 

parties’ consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012). 
3

to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We deny 

Walker’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Order filed, April 12, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00162-CV

____________

IRMA G. GALVAN, Appellant

V.

ROSE B. GARCIA, INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE 

ESTATE OF RICHARD S. BARBOZA, DECEASED, Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-58820

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 21, 2016. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Gina Wilburn, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 6, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135138 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, SHELLY ANNE STRUCKand ELOY STRUCK, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 135138 COA: 276219 Bay CC: 04-003607-NO MICHAEL KUSMIERZ and AUTOZONE, INC., Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 13, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould now be reviewed by this Court.

d0130 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 6, 2008

Clerk
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 192 

Honoring the Sikh American community’s celebration of Vaisakhi. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2015 

Mr. GARAMENDI (for himself, Mr. MEEHAN, Ms. CHU of California, Mr. 

VALADAO, Ms. LEE, Mr. HONDA, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

LAMALFA, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, 

Ms. SPEIER, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Mr. BERA, and Mr. SWALWELL of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the Sikh American community’s celebration of 

Vaisakhi. 

Whereas Sikhism is a religion founded in the Punjab region 

of South Asia over 5 centuries ago and introduced to the 

United States in the 19th century; 

Whereas Sikhism is the fifth largest world religion with approximately 25,000,000 adherents from diverse backgrounds throughout the world, including 500,000 adherents in the United States; 

Whereas Sikhs in the United States pursue diverse professions and walks of life, making rich contributions to the 

economic vibrancy of the United States as farmers, engineers, doctors, scientists, and business owners; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 192 IH 

Whereas Sikh Americans continue to make strides toward securing religious liberty as patriotic members of the 

United States Armed Forces; 

Whereas Vaisakhi is one of the most religiously significant 

days in Sikh history, commemorating the creation of the 

Khalsa, a fellowship of devout Sikhs, by Guru Gobind 

Singh in 1699; 

Whereas the Sikh religion is based on a belief in one God and 

the equality of all human beings; and 

Whereas the celebration of Vaisakhi includes performing Seva 

(selfless service), such as providing free meals to all visitors to Sikh Gurdwaras (Houses of Worship): Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives wishes 

2 the Sikh American community a joyous Vaisakhi. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS