alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10K-YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,407
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                        98
<INVENTORY>                                      8,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,284
<PP&E>                                          30,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,128
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,900
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,893
<SALES>                                         30,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,382
<CGS>                                           23,674
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,559
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (44)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,603
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20


</TABLE>
# C_2016203EN.01003601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/36

---

Article 93

Member States shall prohibit between themselves all customs duties on imports and exports or charges having equivalent effect, and all quantitative restrictions on imports and exports, in respect of:

| (a) | products in List A1 and A2; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

products in List A1 and A2;

1

2

| (b) | products in List B if subject to a Common Customs Tariff and accompanied by a certificate issued by the Commission stating that they are intended to be used for nuclear purposes. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

products in List B if subject to a Common Customs Tariff and accompanied by a certificate issued by the Commission stating that they are intended to be used for nuclear purposes.

Non European territories under the jurisdiction of a Member State may, however, continue to levy import and export duties or charges having equivalent effect where they are of an exclusively fiscal nature. The rates of such duties and charges and the system governing them shall not give rise to any discrimination between that State and the other Member States.

---
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 53551-3-II

Respondent,

v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION

MATTHEW BENJAMIN LABOUNTY, 

aka NICHOLAS RYAN GEORGE,

Appellant.

MAXA, J. – Matthew LaBounty initially appealed his sentence for unlawful possession of 

a controlled substance, buprenorphine. In a supplemental brief, LaBounty challenged his 

conviction following the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Blake, 197 Wn.2d 170, 481 P.3d 

521 (2021). The State concedes that LaBounty’s conviction must be vacated. We reverse and 

remand for the trial court to vacate LaBounty’s conviction.

While LaBounty was incarcerated on another matter, corrections officers found a 

controlled substance in his possession. The State charged LaBounty with unlawful possession of 

a controlled substance, buprenorphine. He agreed to plead guilty based on a plea agreement with 

the State. LaBounty now challenges his conviction.

In Blake, the Supreme Court held that Washington’s strict liability drug possession 

statute, RCW 69.50.4013(1), violates state and federal due process clauses and therefore is void. 

197 Wn.2d at 195. As a result, any conviction based on that statute is invalid. See In re Pers. 

Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

May 4, 2021
No. 53551-3-II

2

Restraint of Hinton, 152 Wn.2d 853, 857, 100 P.3d 801 (2004) (a judgment and sentence is 

invalid on its face when a defendant is convicted of a nonexistent crime). And a conviction

based on an unconstitutional statute must be vacated. See Blake, 197 Wn.2d at 195; State v. 

Carnahan, 130 Wn. App. 159, 164, 122 P.3d 187 (2005) (vacating a conviction that was based 

on a statute that the Supreme Court held was unconstitutional). Therefore, LaBounty’s

conviction for possession of a controlled substance must be vacated.

We reverse and remand to the trial court to vacate LaBounty’s conviction for unlawful 

possession of a controlled substance.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 

2.06.040, it is so ordered.

MAXA, J.

We concur:

SUTTON, J.

GLASGOW, A.C.J.
# C_2016202EN.01002701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/27

---

Article 20

(ex Articles 27a to 27e, 40 to 40b and 43 to 45 TEU and ex Articles 11 and 11a TEC)

(ex Articles 27a

e

b

a

1.   Member States which wish to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves within the framework of the Union's non-exclusive competences may make use of its institutions and exercise those competences by applying the relevant provisions of the Treaties, subject to the limits and in accordance with the detailed arrangements laid down in this Article and in Articles 326 to 334 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

Enhanced cooperation shall aim to further the objectives of the Union, protect its interests and reinforce its integration process. Such cooperation shall be open at any time to all Member States, in accordance with Article 328 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

2.   The decision authorising enhanced cooperation shall be adopted by the Council as a last resort, when it has established that the objectives of such cooperation cannot be attained within a reasonable period by the Union as a whole, and provided that at least nine Member States participate in it. The Council shall act in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 329 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

3.   All members of the Council may participate in its deliberations, but only members of the Council representing the Member States participating in enhanced cooperation shall take part in the vote. The voting rules are set out in Article 330 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

4.   Acts adopted in the framework of enhanced cooperation shall bind only participating Member States. They shall not be regarded as part of the acquis which has to be accepted by candidate States for accession to the Union.

acquis

---
20802

#### State v. Wallace

Affirmed in part, Vacated in part
1

MEMORANDUM

To: Commercial Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator Docket

From: Amy Hambrick, US EPA

Date: September 25, 2012

Subject: EPA Meeting with Commenters 

EPA met with representatives from the Alaska Oil and Gas Association (AOGA) and some of their 

members to discuss their public comments and reconsideration petition submitted to the CISWI 

proposed reconsideration public docket. AOGA’s comments can be found elsewhere in this docket. 

Telephone meetings were held on June 12, 2012, July 26, 2012, and August 29, 2012.
Exhibit 10.21

                        TERMINATION OF LEASE AGREEMENTS

         This  Termination of Lease  Agreements,  (ATermination  Agreement@) is
made and entered into as of the 9th day of February, 1999, by and between Jerry
W. Pennington and Anna Pennington,  husband and wife, each a Kentucky resident,
(the  ALessors@),  and Transit  Leasing,  Inc., an Indiana  corporation,  f/k/a
Capitol Warehouse, Inc., a Kentucky corporation, (the ALessee@).

                              W I T N E S S E T H

         WHEREAS,  the Lessors  and Lessee are parties to the Lease  Agreements
(as defined  below) and  mutually  desire to  terminate  and cancel each of the
Lease Agreements effective as of the date hereof.

         NOW  THEREFORE,  for  and in  consideration  of the  mutual  covenants
contained  herein and other good and  valuable  consideration,  the receipt and
sufficiency  of which are hereby  acknowledged,  the  parties  hereto  agree as
follows:

1.       The Lessors and Lessee are parties to the following  Lease  Agreements
         (the ALeases@), each dated August 15, 1997:

(1)               That certain Lease of property  located in Jefferson  County,
                  Kentucky for the premises  described on the attached  Exhibit
                  A; and
(2) That certain Lease of property  located in Shelby County,  Kentucky for the
premises described on the attached Exhibit B.

2.       The Leases are hereby canceled and terminated effective as of the date
         hereof.  It is agreed that  Lessor  shall not be required to refund to
         Lessee  any  portion  of the rental  amount  paid by Lessee  under the
         Leases  for  the  month  of  February,   1999,   notwithstanding   the
         termination  of the Leases on the date  hereof.  It is further  agreed
         that on and  after  the date  hereof,  Lessee  shall  have no  further
         obligation to Lessor under either of the Leases,  notwithstanding  any
         prepayment  penalty or other provision of the Leases.  Lessors further
         acknowledge  that they have inspected and accept the premises and have
         no  claims  against  Lessee  or any of its  affiliates  in  connection
         herewith.

         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  each  of the  undersigned  have  executed  this
Termination Agreement as of the date set forth above.

LESSORS:
                                                 LESSEE:

_/s/ Jerry W. Pennington____                 Transit Leasing, Inc., f/k/a
Jerry W. Pennington                          Capitol Warehouse, Inc.


_/s/ Anna Pennington______                   By:
                                             __/s/__________________
Anna Pennington
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 10.1

                            ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                          ARI NETWORK SERVICES, INC.

        On November 19, 1997, in accordance with Section 180.1003 of the
Wisconsin Statutes, the following resolution to amend the articles of
incorporation of ARI Network Services, Inc. was duly adopted:

        RESOLVED, that the Company effect a 1-for-4 reverse stock split (the
"Reverse Stock Split") of the Company's Common Stock to be effected by amending
Paragraph 4.1 of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of ARI
Network Services, Inc. to read as follows:

        4.1.  Authorized Shares.  The aggregate number of shares which the
Corporation shall have the authority to issue, the designation of each class of
shares, the authorized number of shares of each class of par value and the par
value thereof per share shall be as follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     Designation                Par Value               Authorized
      of Class                  Per Share            Number of Shares

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
Common Stock                     $ .001                  25,000,000
Preferred Stock                  $ .001                   1,000,000


</TABLE>

        Upon filing of the Articles of Amendment with the Department of
Financial Institutions, each share of Common Stock issued at that time shall
automatically be reclassified and changed into one-fourth (1/4) of one share of
Common Stock.  In lieu of the issuance of any fractional shares that would
otherwise result from the reverse stock split effected by this paragraph, the
Company shall issue to any shareholder that would otherwise receive fractional
shares one (1) additional share of Common Stock.

                        Executed in duplicate this 19th day of November, 1997.
                        
                        ARI NETWORK SERVICES, INC.



                        By:
                           -------------------------------------------------
                           Brian E. Dearing, 
                           Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


This instrument was drafted by:

Larry D. Lieberman
Godfrey & Kahn, S.C.
780 North Water Street 
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11


                         GLOBAL MOTORSPORT GROUP, INC.
                       STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF
                               EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
 
                                     For the three months ended  For the six months ended
                                                 July 31                July 31
                                             1997      1996        1997        1996
                                           --------  --------    --------    --------
<S>                                      <C>         <C>         <C>         <C> 

Net income.............................  $2,524,000  $2,776,000  $4,867,000  $5,784,000
                                         ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
 
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
 
  Common stock.........................   5,026,000   5,259,000   5,117,000   5,212,000
 
  Common stock equivalents.............     165,000      99,000     107,000      97,000
                                         ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
 
  Weighted average shares outstanding..   5,191,000   5,358,000   5,224,000   5,309,000
                                         ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
 
Net income per share...................  $     0.49  $     0.52  $     0.93  $     1.09
                                         ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
 
</TABLE>

                                       1
#### Mizukami v. Mizukami

26382

01/04/2005

Affirmed
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  August 19, 2004 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                          
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                       | Marc N. Teal, 
Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                		 5 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        	    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>             	    DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-TYPE>             	    YEAR
<CASH>                   	    $ 9,833,000 
<SECURITIES>               		    0 
<RECEIVABLES>             	        860,000 
<ALLOWANCES>		   		    0 
<INVENTORY>                		    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>          	     10,693,000 
<PP&E>                     	            0 
<DEPRECIATION>             		    0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       10,693,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>      	        502,000 
<BONDS>                    		    0 
<COMMON>                   	      1,350,384 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>   	            0
<PREFERRED>     	                    0  
<OTHER-SE>                  	      8,840,616 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         10,693,000 
<SALES>                                    0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        613,000 
<CGS>                                      0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        195,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0                           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         418,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     418,000
<DISCONTINUED>             	  	   0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0 
<CHANGES>                                  0 
<NET-INCOME>                            418,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           $0.31 
<EPS-DILUTED>                           $0.31


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,008,231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  390,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,398,705
<PP&E>                                      62,308,818
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,620,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,087,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          451,367
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,635,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,087,114
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,900,605
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,889,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,667)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
1 

Harriet J. Schirmer 

POBox773 

Wrangell, AK 99929 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer 

~-; · r· ~ -~-~- i I ~ .:1-~) 

November 28, 2014 

I am writing to support the continuance of Essential Air Service to Wrangell, 

Petersburg and other cities in Southeast Alaska. 

Thank you for working on this important transportation link in our area without 

road connections.
EX-10.29



 Exhibit 10.29 

DTZ JERSEY HOLDINGS LIMITED 

OFFER TO AMEND 
 CERTAIN
OUTSTANDING STOCK OPTIONS 
  
  

The Offer to Amend will expire at 11:59 PM, Eastern Standard Time, 

on January 31, 2018, unless extended. 
  

 
  

	 	☐	I hereby elect to amend my eligible options. 

  

	 	☐	I hereby elect NOT to amend my eligible options. 

  

	 	☐	I hereby elect to withdraw my previously submitted election to amend my eligible options, which I understand means that my eligible options will NOT be amended. 


By signing below I acknowledge and agree that I have read and understood the documents delivered to me in connection with the Offer to Amend. Sign
and date this form and timely submit it via e-mail (via PDF or similar imaged document file), registered mail, Federal Express or UPS to: 

Melissa Kearney 
 Manager of
Executive Compensation, Global Compensation & Benefits 
 225 West Wacker Drive 

Chicago, IL 60606 | USA 
 Tel. 312-424-8161 

melissa.a.kearney@cushwake.com 

By signing below I acknowledge and agree that I will be deemed to have executed the Amended Option Grant Agreement with respect to my eligible options, and
that from and after the date hereof, subject to the Company accepting my election, these options will be governed by the terms of the Amended Option Grant Agreement and not the original grant agreement pursuant to which award was made. 

 
  

					
	Signed on                                   
      , 201         by	 	  
	 	                                
	(insert date)	 	(print name)	 	
			
	  
	 		 	
	(sign here)	 		 	

  
  

			
	 Accepted on behalf of DTZ Jersey Holdings Limited:
	 	  

		 	 Scott Fuller, SVP, HR



  
 1