alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply630Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Mike Garcia (n... (not verified)PermalinkDecember 21, 2019 - 12:16pmAs a lifelong resident of New Mexico, we're honored to have one of our magnificent trees adorned at the Capitol's west lawn.  Merry Christmas and GOD bless America.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 890 

AN ACT 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal 

Barrier Resources System units in Florida. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 890 EH

1 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

2 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The maps subtitled ‘‘Cape Ro4 mano Unit P15, Tigertail Unit FL–63P’’ and ‘‘Keewaydin 

5 Island Unit P16’’ included in the set of maps entitled 

6 ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ referred to in section 

7 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 

8 3503(a)) and relating to certain John H. Chafee Coastal 

9 Barrier Resources System units in Florida are hereby re10 placed by other maps relating to the units subtitled ‘‘Cape 

11 Romano Unit P15/P15P’’, ‘‘Keewaydin Island Unit P16/ 

12 P16P, Tigertail Unit FL–63P’’, and ‘‘Keewaydin Island 

13 Unit P16/P16P’’, respectively, and dated April 10, 2015. 

14 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

15 shall keep the replacement maps referred to in subsection 

16 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

17 section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

18 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Passed the House of Representatives February 9, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 890 

AN ACT 

Coastal Barrier Resources System units in Florida. 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE>                          5
 <LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
 </LEGEND>

    <S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                1,063
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         6,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                            760
<INVENTORY>                                             837
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      9,861
<PP&E>                                               12,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                        2,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       20,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 7,004
<BONDS>                                               3,295
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              3,302
<OTHER-SE>                                            3,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         20,751
<SALES>                                               9,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      9,824
<CGS>                                                 8,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         9,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         80
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             10
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (223)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (223)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.08)


</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

AND 

THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF 

TECHNOLOGY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., 

Defendant-Cross Appellant. 

__________________________ 

2009-1372, -1380, -1416, -1417 

__________________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

District of Massachusetts in case nos. 06-CV-11109 and 

06-CV-11585, Judge Rya W. Zobel. 

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

_________________________ 

MCKESSON TECHNOLOGIES INC. (FORMERLY 

MCKESSON INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, LLC), 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

v. 
AKAMAI TECH v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS 2

MCKESSON TECH V. EPIC SYSTEMS

EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION 

Defendant-Appellee. 

__________________________ 

2010-1291 

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Georgia in case no. 06-CV-2965, Chief 

Judge Jack T. Camp. 

 ________________________ 

ON MOTION 

________________________ 

O R D E R 

Appellant Akamai Technologies, Inc. in Appeal No. 

2009-1372, and Appellant McKesson Technolgies Inc. in 

Appeal No. 2010-1291 separately move for a 14-day 

extension of time to file a reply brief. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motions are granted. The briefs are due September 6, 2011. 
AKAMAI TECH v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS

 MCKESSON TECH V. EPIC SYSTEMS 

3

FOR THE COURT

August 12, 2011

Date 

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

cc: Donald R. Dunner, Esq. 

Robert S. Frank, Jr., Esq. 

Aaron M. Panner, Esq. 

Daryl L. Joseffer, Esq. 

William H. Boice, Esq.
[ARTICLE] 5
[MULTIPLIER] 1000
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1996
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1996
[CASH]                                             616
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                     2066
[ALLOWANCES]                                       131
[INVENTORY]                                       6200
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                 11645
[PP&E]                                            8305
[DEPRECIATION]                                    7258
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                   13033
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                             8485
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                          1061
[OTHER-SE]                                        2464
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                     13033
[SALES]                                          22917
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                 22917
[CGS]                                            17356
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                    17356
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                 14149
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                 244
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 (8832)
[INCOME-TAX]                                     (200)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                             (8632)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                    (8632)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                   (0.96)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   (0.96)
</TABLE>
March 20, 2007

27773

#### Nakamura v. State

Affirmed
#### David W. Doyle, Plaintiff, *v.*New York City Transit Authority et al., Defendants. City of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff, *v.*Poirier & McLane Corporation, Third-Party Defendant. New York City Transit Authority et al., Fourth-Party Plaintiffs, *v.*Poirier & McLane Corporation, Fourth-Party Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

June 2, 1959.

*Lawless <& Lynch*for Poirier & McLane Corporation.

*Austin E. Titus, Jr.,*for plaintiff.

*676*Daniel E. Scannell*for New York City Transit Authority.

*Charles JL. Tenney, Corporation Counsel,*for City of New York.

James S. Brown, J.

Motion by fourth-party defendant to dismiss the fourth-party complaint.

The main complaint alleges, as a first cause of action, that while plaintiff was walking on the sidewalk he was struck by a bus operated by the New York City Transit Authority and defendant Muller as a result of which he sustained injury. A second cause of action was asserted against the City of New York for neglect of duty owed to the public. The City of New York, as third-party plaintiff, served a third-party complaint upon Poirier & McLane Corporation, the third-party defendant. Thereafter the Transit Authority and Muller, as fourth-party plaintiffs, served a fourth-party complaint upon this same defendant as a fourth-party defendant. The time for the fourth-party defendant to answer the fourth-party complaint not having expired when the action was reached for trial, the fourth-party action was severed by the court and not litigated. Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendants New York City Transit Authority, Muller and the City of New York, and judgment over against the moving corporate defendant was granted in favor of the City of New York on its third-party complaint. All defendants have appealed from the judgment and said appeal is now pending.

The fourth-party defendant urges that the fourth-party complaint be dismissed without prejudice on the grounds that the main action has been litigated to a conclusion and that to permit the complaint to stand would confuse the issues and that the action would be premature if brought to trial prior to actual payment to the fourth-party plaintiffs. The reasons advanced for the dismissal are without merit. Furthermore, in the event the judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered, it will be possible to litigate the issues raised by the fourth-party complaint at the same time as the new trial is had by the making of a motion to vacate the order of severance or to consolidate the actions.

Motion denied. Settle order on notice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,487,037
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  151,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,638,314
<PP&E>                                      45,382,342
<DEPRECIATION>                              40,894,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,126,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          549,861
<BONDS>                                      2,105,147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,471,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,126,605
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,702,873
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,914,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             157,233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,368,530)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,368,530)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,368,530)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seen on Screen TV Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Antoine Jarjour, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 13th day of July, 2012.








ANTOINE JARJOURAntoine JarjourChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Factsheets, Brochures, and Other

Outreach Products

Last Modified: 

Print

APHIS is committed to informing stakeholders and the public about our work and

regulations, as well as pests and diseases that affect U.S. agriculture and natural

resources. You can search for factsheets, brochures, and other outreach products by

title, publication year, category, and item type.

Loading...

Publications
Exhibit 10.1


 


Date: July 12th, 2018


 


Board of Directors


Sincerity Applied Materials Holdings Corp.


4 Avoca Street


South Yarra, Victoria,


Australia 3141


 


Resignation as Director


 


Dear Board
of Directors,


 


I hereby tender my resignation as director of Sincerity
Applied Materials Holdings Corp., effective July 12th, 2018.


 


Sincerely,


 


	/s/ Yang Fan	 
	Yang Fan
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.2

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-92906) pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated Stock
Option Plan of Standard Management Corporation, the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-41119) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Stock Option
Plan of Standard Management Corporation, the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-41117) pertaining to the Standard Management Corporation Savings Plan,
and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-101359) pertaining to the 2002
Stock Incentive Plan of Standard Management Corporation of our report dated
February 14, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Standard
Management International S. A. and subsidiaries, as at September 30, 2001 and
2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended September 30, 2001 included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Standard Management Corporation.

|                         |  |               
|------------------------ |  | --------------
|                         |  | /s/ KPMG Audit
|                         |  |               
|Luxembourg
March 3, 2003 |  |
#### Ruhlin, Appellant, *v.*The East Ohio Gas Co., Appellee.

(No. 31657

Decided January 12, 1949.)

*Messrs. Brouse, McDowell, May, Bierce S Wortman*and *Mr. Charles R. Iden,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taft, JJ., concur.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
New Dome Symbolizes Union, 1863
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1974

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

Thomas U. Walter, who was hired as architect of the Capitol extensions in 1851, also designed the building's new cast-iron dome. In this mural Walter (center, in brown coat and top hat) shows his dome design to President Abraham Lincoln.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The eastern north-south corridor has been termed the Hall of Capitols because it features paintings of 16 different buildings that housed the Continental and United States Congresses from 1754 to 1865. Painted in the barrel vaults of the ceilings are eight historic events that occurred during the first 65 years of the Capitol's existence. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
18493

#### State v. Adams

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 943 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 943

     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the 
   requirement for employer disclosure of information on health care 
  coverage of employees who are Medicare beneficiaries, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2015

Mr. Lewis (for himself and Mr. Reichert) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition 
      to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the 
   requirement for employer disclosure of information on health care 
  coverage of employees who are Medicare beneficiaries, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Employer Relief Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. REPEALING SECTION 1862(B)(5) OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 1862(b) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395y(b)) is amended by striking paragraph (5).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to 
information required to be provided on or after January 1, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000879555
<NAME> BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREIT FUND III L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             156,056,627
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               156,056,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,955
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,901,030)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,676,075)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
August 21, 2001

23497

#### State v. Cooper

Affirmed