alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Franklin Lake Resources Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fr.
Gregory Ofiesh, President, CEO and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



April 8, 2005                                 /S/ Gregory Ofiesh
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Fr. Gregory Ofiesh
                                              President and CEO
                                              Acting Chief Financial Officer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply11754Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Elizabeth Brown (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 31, 2022 - 11:55amI recognize those ceiling lights! I worked beneath them every day for about five years.  Thank you AOC, for making the them less green (color rendering and color temperature) and more green (energy efficient) at the same time.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
January 20, 2006

26139

#### Meyer v. McGee

Affirmed
# L_2004349EN.01002501.xml

| 25.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 349/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 349/25

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 70/2004

of 8 June 2004

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by the Agreement on the participation of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic in the European Economic Area signed on 14 October 2003 in Luxembourg (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by the Agreement on the participation of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic in the European Economic Area signed on 14 October 2003 in Luxembourg (1).

| (2) | Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 1 (Council Directive 76/768/EEC) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32003 L 0015: Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 (OJ L 66, 11.3.2003, p. 26).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32003 L 0015: Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 (OJ L 66, 11.3.2003, p. 26).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2003/15/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 June 2004, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

S. GILLESPIE

---

(1)  
  OJ L 130, 29.4.2004, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 66, 11.3.2003, p. 26.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Saroitta 

The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5). 

Accordingly, we approve attorney Lisa A. Holmes's resignation. SCR 

98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted. 

It is so ORDERED. 

, C.J. 

Hardesty 

J. 

Parraguirr 

1:=M----sz1 

Douglas 

C-4-4 

Cherry 

Cid 

J. 

J. 

Gibbons 

geku r lent 7 

Pickering 

cc: David A. Clark, Bar Counsel 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

Lisa A. Holmes 

Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) I947A 4WD
#### GECC Financial Corp. v. Jaffarian

16397

8/31/95

Granted

79 Hawai'i 516904 P.2d 530
EXHIBIT 32



          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), Dorrit J. Bern, Chairman of
the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer and Eric M. Specter, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Charming Shoppes, Inc. (the
"Company"), each certifies with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on
Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2004 (the "Report") that, to the best
of her/his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   April 8, 2004

                                 /S/ Dorrit J. Bern
                                 ------------------
                                 Dorrit J. Bern
                                 Chairman of the Board
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:   April 8, 2004

                                 /S/ Eric M. Specter
                                 -------------------
                                 Eric M. Specter
                                 Executive Vice President
                                 Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Charming Shoppes, Inc. and will be retained by Charming Shoppes,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
August 23, 2001

22936

#### Maui Collection Service, Inc. v. Elaban

Affirmed
Structure of DP

- 111

Structure

– CBI Chemical name

– CBI
March 19, 2003

23958

#### Schuette v. Schuette

Affirmed
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 15-1475V 

Filed: April 22, 2016 

Unpublished 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

LAURIE SIMMON, * 

* 

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* Influenza Vaccination;

* Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Administration (“SIRVA”);

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

* 

Respondent. * 

* 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ronald Homer, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. 

Debra Begley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

On December 7, 2015, Laurie Simmon (“petitioner”) filed a petition for 

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 

§300aa-10, et seq.,2(the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”). Petitioner alleges that she

suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of 

receiving the influenza vaccine on September 24, 2014. Petition at 1. Petitioner further 

alleges that she has suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months 

and that no lawsuit has been filed or settlement accepted by herself or anyone else for 

her injuries. Id. at ¶¶ 16-17. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of 

the Office of Special Masters. 

On April 21, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes 

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

1

 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended 

at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2

 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 

v.
2

at 1. Specifically, respondent indicates that she “believes that the alleged injury is 

consistent SIRVA that was caused by the administration of petitioner’s flu vaccination.” 

Id. at 3. Respondent further indicates that “petitioner meets the statutory requirements 

by suffering the condition for more than six months . . . [and] has satisfied all legal 

prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act.” Id. (citations omitted).

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
- 1 -

Proposed Alternatives

The following optional alternative institutes a management practice rather than numerical 

emission limit. The alternative defines testing and monitoring requirements for area source 

engines with catalytic control, and includes action levels that require operator response. 

Catalyst Temperature and CO Monitoring of Catalyst Activity:

• Employ automated high temperature engine shutdown (based on the temperature limit in the 

rule) as parameter monitoring to prevent catalyst damage. Operator should have the option 

of installing continuous temperature monitoring in lieu of high temp shutdown for those 

instances where critical operation makes an immediate shutdown undesirable and potentially 

unsafe.

AND

• Monitoring based on an initial CO test and ongoing semi-annual CO tests. The test would 

evaluate CO catalyst performance as part of a management practice using a portable analyzer 

method to verify “catalyst activity”. The CO tests would be single test runs consisting of 

exhaust sampling for a minimum of 15 minutes using portable methods including state

approved methodologies, EPA CTM-034, and/or the ASTM D6522 portable analyzer 

methods. Standard performance test methods would also be acceptable (i.e., in some cases 

that methodology may be available due to other stack tests occurring in the area for other 

rules or permit requirements).

The “catalyst activity level” for each engine type is presented below, followed by a discussion of 

required operator response when CO testing indicates the catalyst activity level is not met. 

- 4-stroke lean burn (4SLB) catalyst activity assessment – The measured CO level

would be compared to a 47 ppmv (dry, 15% O2) management practice catalyst 

activity level.

OR

- 4-stroke rich burn (4SRB) catalyst activity assessment – The measured CO percent 

reduction would be compared to a 75%1

Catalyst Activity and Operator Actions: 

or higher management practice catalyst 

activity level. Pre- and post-catalyst measurements would be corrected to a common 

percent O2 for calculating percent reduction. Sequential pre- and post-catalyst tests 

would be acceptable, but must be conducted as soon as practical while maintaining 

engine operating conditions. 

 1 See attached vendor CO performance guarantee. 
- 2 -

The actionable catalyst activity levels are presented above. If CO testing does not meet the 

“catalyst activity level” (47 ppmv CO for LB or 75% reduction for RB), then the engine will be 

shut down as soon as safely possible until catalyst cleaning / replacement occurs. Once placed 

into service, the CO test will be conducted within 7 days to ensure that the catalyst activity level 

is met.
- 3 -

Attachment

4SRB Catalyst Performance Guarantee
-

4-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          28,000
<SECURITIES>                                   200,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  429,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               733,000
<PP&E>                                       3,732,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,059,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,925,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          576,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           13,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,057,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,925,000
<SALES>                                      2,668,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,678,000
<CGS>                                        2,192,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,650,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President of ATEL Financial Services, LLC,
general  partner of ATEL Cash  Distribution  Fund IV, L.P. (the  "Partnership"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Partnership for the quarter ended
September  30, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:        November 11, 2004



/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
------------------------
Paritosh K. Choksi
Executive Vice President of General
Partner, Principal Financial Officer of Registrant


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  Partnership  and  will  be  retained  by the  Partnership  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
~ 

--

.

. ~-.·." . __ c¢:· . 

·~··· ·~··~ .. J'

~ ··· .. ·. {,l ~~= ..... ·.·.-.. tJ·. ' .. ; ,- :, ~ ~~; 

UNMANNED AERIAL SoLUTIONs, INc. 

Blue-Chip Unmanned Aerial Solutions, Inc. 

Attn: Clint P. Stevens 

1965 South Beech St. 

Wichita, KS 67207 

316-305-5498 

April 22, 2015 

US. Department ofTransportation 

Docket Operations 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Request to amend and allow for Blue-Chip UAS, Inc. the ability to utilize 

additional sUAS platforms under the same direction as provided within exemption 

#11172, docket# FAA-2014-0787-0009, .approved February 10, 2015. 

Dear Sir/Madam, 

Dear Sir or Madam; 

Blue-Chip Unmanned Aerial Solutions, Inc. (Blue-Chip UAS) was issued an exemption under 

Section 333 of the "FAA Modernization and Reform act of 2012" (the "Reform Act") numbered 11172 

(the Exemption) for the purpose of conducting UAS operations within the oil and gas, agriculture, 

wildlife and aerial photography industries. Blue-Chip UAS, herby requests an amendment to the 

Exemption to allow an additional type of electric "FL'Xed Wing" unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to be 

operated in full compliance with the conditions set forth within the Exemption. 

Blue-Chip UAS, requests permission to operate the following UAS based on their type, size, 

weight, and speed under the same terms and conditions contained within the Exemption and provided by 

the parameters set forth in regards to capabilities and limitations identified within the Flight Operations 

Manual and Maintenance Manual attached as provided. 
Precision Hawk Lancaster 

Altavian Nova F6500 

Fixed Wing 

Fixed Wing 

4ft Span 

9ft Span 

Weight 

<lOlbs 

<16lbs 

Speed 

<60mph 

<70mph 

Blue-Chip UAS, respectfully requests the same finding from the FAA as provided to 

Aerial Mob, LLC as to their amended exemption numbered 11066A, docket ID F AA-2014-0353, dated 

February 2, 2015. As indicated, the FAA found the amendment request was not precedent setting, that 

good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register and that any delay 

in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the organization. 

Thank you for your time in regards to this petition and please direct any correspondence to Mr. 

Clint Stevens. 

Clint P. Stevens 

Executive Director & Co-Founder 

Blue-Chip UAS, Inc. 

316-305-5498 

cc: 

Robert Pappas 

Kiera Jones 

John Barbagallo
November 27, 1998

21498

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1544

_____________________________
M ARKTAVIOS M ARTIN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court fo r Escambia County

. John L. Miller , Judge

. November 15, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and K ELSEY and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Marktavios Martin, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Tabitha Herrera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
26822

#### State v. Agtarap

Affirmed
ex10-a



 



Exhibit 10(a)



Amendment to Employment Agreement

of Norman C. Payson, M.D.



         THIS AMENDMENT to a certain Employment Agreement by and between Norman C.
Payson, M.D. (the “Executive”) and Oxford Health Plans, Inc. (the “Company”)
dated as of February 23, 1998 (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of the 1st
day of March, 2002.


         WHEREAS, this Amendment has been approved by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors of the Company.


         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:



	 	1.	 	Amendment. The Agreement is hereby amended to provide that
on February 1, 2003 the provisions of Section 4(b)(iv)(B) of the
Agreement on page 10 thereof shall expire and be of no further force
and effect and the following provision shall then become effective:




	 	 	 
	 	 	
"(B) Beginning on February 1, 2003 and so
long as the Executive remains the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, the
Executive hereby agrees not to sell, transfer
or otherwise dispose of shares of Common
Stock of the Company owned by him and
unexercised options held by him that are
fully vested and exercisable (all of such
options and owned shares are referred to in
this paragraph as the “Shares”) if
immediately thereafter, the Executive would
be the holder of less than one million
(1,000,000) Shares.




	 	2.	 	Other Terms. Except as amended hereby the terms and
conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force
and effect.



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the
date first above written.



	 	 	 
	Oxford Health Plans, Inc.	 	 
	
	
	
	

	By: /s/ NILS LOMMERIN	 	
/s/ NORMAN C. PAYSON, M.D.
	
	 	


	Nils Lommerin

EVP, Operations and Corporate Svc	 	
Norman C. Payson, M.D.



  1