alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12262Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Martin Shore (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 2, 2023 - 4:35pmNice article!  Consider a follow up to this describing and illustrating the Statue's move from Russell to the CVC. I have some pictures I can send you!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Exhibit 3.1

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

TO

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

T-3 Energy
Services, Inc. (the Corporation), a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the DGCL), hereby certifies as follows:

FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation on April 10, 2006, resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as
follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the introductory paragraph of Article V of the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

The Corporation shall have the authority to issue an
aggregate of 25,000,000 shares, consisting of 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.001 per share (Preferred Stock) and 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share (Common Stock).

SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation was duly called and held,
upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the DGCL, at which meeting the holders of a majority of the shares of issued and outstanding common stock, par value $.001 per share, of the Corporation voted in favor of the foregoing amendment.

THIRD: That the foregoing amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted by the stockholders of the Corporation on June 1,
2006, pursuant to the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the duly authorized
Secretary of the Corporation, for the purpose of amending the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation pursuant to Section 242 of the DGCL, does make and file this Certificate of Amendment this 2nd day of June, 2006.



T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC.By:

/s/    Michael T. Mino, SecretaryMichael T. Mino, Secretary
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
September 11 Anniversary Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Swamp White Oak

Year
    2011

Location
      
Capitol Square, S.W.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text of the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Commemorative Tree

*Quercus bicolor*
(Swamp White Oak)

To Commemorate the Tenth Anniversary of
the September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attacks

sponsored by
Rep. Jerrold Nadler

September 13, 2011

Tree Details

Image
    Up-close photo of the swamp white oak leafs.This tree replaces a mature 105 year old tree that was lost the previous year. The swamp white oak was chosen among numerous possibilities to be used throughout the 9/11 memorial in lower Manhattan, where over 400 were planted.
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    Photo of plaque.
    The September 11 Anniversary Tree in winter.

The September 11 Anniversary Tree in winter.
    The September 11 Anniversary Tree in spring.

The September 11 Anniversary Tree in spring.
    The September 11 Anniversary Tree in summer.

The September 11 Anniversary Tree in summer.
    The September 11 Anniversary Tree in fall.

The September 11 Anniversary Tree in fall.

      Previous Image
        Next Image

          Photo of plaque.
      The September 11 Anniversary Tree in winter.
      The September 11 Anniversary Tree in spring.
      The September 11 Anniversary Tree in summer.
      The September 11 Anniversary Tree in fall. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
August 22, 2007

27701

#### State v. Otis

Affirmed
#### American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company, Respondent, *v.*Public National Bank and Trust Company, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 26, 1958.

*605
      *Moses & Singer (Lyonel E. Zunz*and *Alice Austin*of counsel), for appellant.

*Samuel Komoroff*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

As amended by the court below, the complaint presently alleges a cause of action against but one defendant, Bankers Trust Company. To state a cause of action against that one defendant, the complaint alleges a conclusion of law — that the forgery bond insured defendant ‘ ‘ only in its capacity as a depositary bank ”. In this respect of course, the complaint is insufficient. Considering the pleading as a whole, it attempts to allege a cause of action by the bank against itself. To state a cause of action in the circumstances, the plaintiff must do more than the court below required, that is, properly designate *606the defendant. Since the pleader, as plaintiff, stands in the shoes of that defendant, the pleading must allege clearly and unmistakably ultimate facts stating a cause of action against defendant in its capacity as collecting bank.

The order so far as appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within 10 days after service of copy of order entered hereon, upon payment of said costs and disbursements.

Concur — Hoestadter, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Order reversed, etc. *607entire premises. The Business Bent Law (§ 12; L. 1945, eh. 314, as amd.) is “inapplicable * * * to space demised under a lease or sublease executed subsequent to March thirty-first, nineteen hundred fifty to a person not in possession at the time of the execution thereof.” There was evidence that the landlord accepted rent from the original lessee, with knowledge that the entire premises were occupied by another for the entire remaining term.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

I,Casper Zublin, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of DynTek Inc. certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2007 of DynTek, Inc.;

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 21, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ Casper Zublin, Jr. |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                    |   |   | Casper Zublin, Jr.     |
|                    |   |   | Chief Executive Officer     |
|                         |        |        |                             |  |

 

----
# C_2016202EN.01018001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/180 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/180

---

Article 308

(ex Article 266 TEC)

(ex Article 266 TEC)

The European Investment Bank shall have legal personality.

The members of the European Investment Bank shall be the Member States.

The Statute of the European Investment Bank is laid down in a Protocol annexed to the Treaties. The Council acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure, at the request of the European Investment Bank and after consulting the European Parliament and the Commission, or on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and the European Investment Bank, may amend the Statute of the Bank.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Christopher Anzalone, Chief Executive Officer of Arrowhead Research
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2009



/S/    CHRISTOPHER
ANZALONEChristopher AnzaloneChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer


A signed original of these written statements required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to Arrowhead Research Corporation and will be retained by Arrowhead Research Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K’NAPP,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION;

et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-16243

D.C. No. 1:12-cv-01895-LJO-MJS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2015** 

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Eric Charles Rodney K’napp appeals pro se from

the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging federal claims related to

the conditions of his confinement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

FILED

APR 16 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with an

order to file an amended complaint that comports with Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 8. McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir. 1996). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing K’napp’s action

because, after being warned of the possibility of dismissal, Knapp filed another

complaint that was not in compliance with the district court’s order and Rule 8. 

See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992) (setting forth factors

relevant to dismissal for failure to comply with a court order, and explaining that,

although dismissal is a harsh penalty, a district court’s dismissal should not be

disturbed unless there is a “definite and firm conviction that the court below

committed a clear error of judgment in the conclusion it reached upon a weighing

of the relevant factors” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)); see also

McHenry, 84 F.3d at 1177 (Rule 8 requires that each averment of a pleading be

simple, concise, and direct, stating which defendant is liable to the plaintiff for

which wrong).

We reject K’napp’s contentions that he was not required to comply with the

magistrate judge’s orders, and that the district court judge and magistrate judge

demonstrated bias and failed to consider his pro se status.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

2 14-16243
appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

3 14-16243
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Wildlife Damage Operational

Activities

Last Modified: 

Print

Wildlife Services provides wildlife damage management assistance to protect

agriculture, natural resources, property and health and safety. In many instances,

more than a single type of resource benefits from operational management

activities. Wildlife Services protects resources through implementation of integrated

wildlife damage management programs.

Protecting Agriculture 

WS' operational activities to protect agriculture include protecting livestock and

aquaculture from predators; managing invasive species; managing beaver damage;

managing wildlife species such as starlings, blackbirds, vultures, and waterfowl;

controlling and eliminating wildlife rabies; and other wildlife disease activities.

Learn More
Protecting Natural Resources 

WS' operational activities to protect natural resources include threatened and

endangered species protection; managing wildlife species such as blackbirds,

vultures, and waterfowl; invasive species management; and wildlife rabies

management.

Learn More
Protecting Property 

WS' operational activities to protect property include invasive species management;

beaver damage management; managing wildlife species such as starlings,

blackbirds, vultures, and waterfowl; and airport wildlife hazards management.

Learn More

Protecting Human Health and Safety 

WS' operational activities to protect human health and safety include managing

wildlife hazards at airports; invasive species management; managing wildlife species
such as starlings, blackbirds, vultures, and waterfowl; controlling or eliminating

wildlife rabies; and other wildlife disease activities.

Learn More
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply572Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Eden (not verified) (not verified)PermalinkAugust 23, 2017 - 9:01amThank you Mr. Burns for your care, support and kindness.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply535Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Ed Loomis (not... (not verified)PermalinkJuly 14, 2016 - 2:27pmGreat article. Thank you.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Timothy Sherlock, certify that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network
Services, Inc.;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report; and
|  
|3. |  | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report.                       

Date: March 16, 2004

|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Timothy Sherlock   
|       |  |                        
|By:    |  | Timothy Sherlock       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.