alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

NO. 03-14-00407-CR

JERRYL ROBINSON § IN THE THIRD 

V. § DISTRICT COURT OF 

THE STATE OF TEXAS § APPEALS OF TEXAS 

STATE’S SECOND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

 Now comes the State of Texas, Appellee in the above styled and numbered 

cause, and moves for an extension of time of 30 days to file Appellee’s brief, and 

for good cause would show the following: 

I.

 Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of Theft > $1,500 < 

$20,000. The offense was enhanced from a state jail felony to a second-degree 

felony, and Appellant was sentenced to 15 years confinement on June 11, 2014. 

Appellant’s brief was originally due November 3, 2014. After two motions for 

extension were granted by the Court, Appellant filed his brief on February 9, 2015. 

II.

 I am handling the appeal for the State in this case.. I was out of the country –

performing some manual work while on vacation – from March 21st to March 30th. 

Upon my return I worked through the Easter weekend on another appellate brief, 

which I filed shortly before midnight on April 13th in 03-14-00617-CR. On that 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00407-CR

4959695

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/20/2015 4:36:06 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/20/2015 4:36:06 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

same day I filed a motion for new trial regarding orders of expunction; the trial

court granted the new trial on April 14

th

. I have also assisted with other appeals

and research questions in the office, submitted proposed findings of fact and

conclusions of law to the district court, worked on expunctions, and over the past

few days I have worked long hours related to a pending petition for mandamus.

Because of the foregoing, I have not yet been able to complete a significant amount 

of work on a response, and respectfully request an extension of 30 days to file the 

State’s brief in the instant cause. This is the second extension sought by Appellee.

III.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State’s counsel 

respectfully prays for an extension of 30 days, until May 20, 2015, so that an 

adequate response may be made to Appellant’s brief. This extension is not 

requested for purposes of delay but so that justice may be done. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Joshua D. Presley

Joshua D. Presley SBN: 24088254

preslj@co.comal.tx.us

Comal Criminal District Attorney’s Office 

150 N. Seguin Avenue, Suite 307

New Braunfels, Texas 78130

Ph: (830) 221-1300 / Fax: (830) 608-2008
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Joshua D. Presley, Assistant District Attorney for the State of Texas, 

Appellee, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this State’s Second Motion 

to Extend Time to File Brief has been delivered to Appellant JERRYL 

ROBINSON’s attorney in this matter:

Marilee H. Brown

Marilee@hazelbrownlaw.com

Hazel Brown Wright Reneau, PLLC

391 Landa Street

New Braunfels, TX 78130

Counsel for Appellant on Appeal

By electronically sending it to the above-listed email address through 

efile.txcourts.gov, this 20

th day of April, 2015.

 /s/ Joshua D. Presley

 Joshua D. Presley
EXHIBIT 24.13
                                   CERTIFICATE

      I, Lina P. Holm,  Secretary  of Public  Service  Company of  Oklahoma,  an
Oklahoma corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby certify that set forth below is
a complete and  accurate  copy of a certain  resolution  adopted by the Board of
Directors of the  Corporation  on this 18th day of January,  2000, and that such
resolution is in full force and effect as of the date of this certificate.


                       Public Service Company of Oklahoma
                          Board of Directors Resolution
                                January 18, 2000

      RESOLVED,  that each officer of Public Service  Company of Oklahoma listed
at the end of this  sentence  is  hereby  authorized  to  make,  constitute  and
appoint,  in his  respective  capacity,  a power  of  attorney  in  favor of the
person(s)  listed  directly after his name at the end of this  sentence,  as his
true and lawful  attorney(s)-in-fact and agent(s), with full power and authority
(and in the case of more than one attorney-in-fact, each attorney-in-fact acting
alone  and  without  the  other)  to  execute  in the name and on  behalf of the
officer, in any and all capacities, the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for 1999 and any and all  amendments  thereto,  to be filed under the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  as  amended,  and any other  documents  and  instruments
incidental  thereto,  and to file the same,  with all  exhibits  thereto and all
documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
and grant to such  attorney(s)-in-fact,  and  agent(s)  (and in the case of more
than  one  attorney-in-fact,   each  of  them),  full  power  and  authority  of
substitution  and  revocation in the premises and full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing  requisite  and necessary to be done in
and about the  premises,  as fully and all intents  and  purposes as the officer
might or could do in person.

1.    T. D.  Churchwell  is  authorized  to make,  constitute  and  appoint R.
      Russell Davis to be his attorney(s)-in-fact.
2.    R. Russell  Davis is authorized  to make,  constitute  and appoint T. D.
      Churchwell to be his attorney(s)-in-fact.

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of
Public Service Company of Oklahoma this day, the 18th of January, 2000.



      /s/ Lina P. Holm
          Lina P. Holm





      CORPORATE SEAL
Exhibit 23


              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



The Board of Directors
CDI Corp:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos.  33-7263,333-65879,  333-69007 and  333-34508) on Form S-8 of CDI Corp. of
our report dated February 21, 2003, relating to the consolidated  balance sheets
of CDI Corp. and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows, changes in shareholders' equity
for each of the years in the three-year  period ended December 31, 2002, and the
related financial statement  schedule,  which report appears in the December 31,
2002 annual report on form 10-K of CDI Corp.  Our report refers to the Company's
adoption of  Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standard No. 142,  Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets on January 1, 2002.





                                                        /s/ KPMG LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 27, 2003
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

s hould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________ No. 98-40542 Summary Calendar

_______________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS MATHY WADE ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

(1:97-CR-82-1)

_________________________ January 7, 1999 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Mathy Roberts was convicted of possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). On appeal, he challenges only the sufficiency of the evidence. The standard of review is whether any rational trier of fact could have found that the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 318 (1979).2

The evidence here plainly meets that standard. Roberts was driving a car that was being pursued by police. A citizen saw a silver reflective object fly out of the driver's side window. The witness called police and told them where the object had la nded. There they found a large stainless-steel firearm. There were no other objects in the area. The jury easily could have found that the gun that was found

was thrown by Roberts. It takes little imagination, therefore, to conclude that he had “possessed” it in the vehicle. AFFIRMED.
David M. Kirstein

Direct 202.331-3348

Fax 202.331.3933 Email dkirstein@yklaw.com

March 5, 2010

BY ELECTRONIC FILING

Robert J. Finamore U.S. Department of Transportation Office of International Aviation, X-45 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

RE : Partial Withdrawal of Exemption Renewal Application of vivaAerobus

Docket OST-2008-0095

Dear Mr. Finamore:

Aeroenlaces Nacionales, S.A. de C.V. d/ b/a vivaAerobus hereby withdraws the (1) Veracruz, Mexico and Austin, Texas and (2) Puer to Vallarta, Mexico a nd Austin, Texas portions of the Application for Renewal of Exempti on filed on February 24, 2010 in Docket OST-2008-

0095.

Sincerely,

David M. Kirstein

cc: Robert Finamore by email
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,736,547
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  659,244
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,395,791
<PP&E>                                      22,944,519
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,401,833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,939,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          302,221
<BONDS>                                      4,983,396
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,653,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,939,060
<SALES>                                      3,632,314
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,540,339
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,975,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             301,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                263,502
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            263,502
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   263,502
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
y

MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00948-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.E.W., a Child

Appeal from the 257th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2013-06519J).

TO THE 257TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 19th day of February 2015, the case upon appeal to revise 

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

After due consideration, the Court grants appellant 

L.W.’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, the Court

dismisses the appeal.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered February 19, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices 

Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

April 17, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
Exhibit 10.2


 


Third Amendment to Employment Agreement


 


This Third Amendment to the Employment
Agreement (this “Third Amendment”) is entered into as of this 15th day of April 2018, by and between Joshua Hexter,
an individual residing in Jerusalem, Israel (the “Executive”), and ORAMED Ltd., a company incorporated
under the laws of the State of Israel, with an address at Hi-Tech Park 2/4 Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel 91390 (the “Company”).


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2013 (the “Original Agreement”),
which was amended on July 21, 2015 and June 27, 2016 (the "Amendments" and, together with the Original Agreement,
the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, Company
and the Executive desire to amend some of the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Company and the Executive agree as follows:


 


1. In Section 2.1(a)
- Salary of the Original Agreement, the following paragraph is hereby added:


 


As of May 1st,
2018, the Executive shall be entitled to a gross monthly salary of NIS 51,625 (the “Salary”).


 


2. Except
for the changes and/or additions stated herein, all the other terms of the Original Agreement shall remain valid and bind the parties
without any change. In the case of a contradiction between the provisions of this Third Amendment and the provisions of the Employment
Agreement, the provisions of this Third Amendment shall prevail. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term “Agreement”
as used in the Employment Agreement shall be deemed to be the Employment Agreement as amended by this Third Amendment.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Third Amendment to Employment Agreement as of April 15, 2018.


 


	 	Oramed Ltd.
	 	 
	 	/s/ Nadav Kidron
	 	Nadav Kidron, CEO
	 	 
	 	/s/ Joshua Hexter
	 	Joshua Hexter
Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: Barb and Ken[kenbarbgarden@charter.net] 
 ... Sent: 
 . ~·Stlnday, February 14, 2010 3:39 PM 
 . To: 
 . ·Devany..Oennis (OST): Swanson, Bdan (OST) 


··Subject: Supporting Cape Air Service in Plattsburgh 


LI 

Go.Q9 Af.t~noqn.;. 

·fnope·thaftne final decision regarding airline service to Plattsburgh has not yet been made. I believe that our County 

Legislature came to an incorrect decision recently, and that the correct choice for our area should be CAPE AIR. It is 

clear to many that bigger .is not better in this case. The DOT should consider all the facts for themselves, and not accept 

the recommendation of the county. Andrew Schonbek, former CEO of Schonbek Worldwide Lighting, has written very 

eloquently in support of Cape Air., Hi~ opinion piece appears in the Saturday, February 13th issue of the Press 

Republican and really makes an unmistakeably strong case for retaining the company with the proven track record of 

service, safety, andaffordability--CAPE AIR. . 

Thank you for your attention. 

Barbara Adams 


Plattsburgh, NY 


1
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Lisa C. Steele, Respondent. Ray Simon, Inc., Appellant; Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 14, 1990, which, *inter alia,*ruled that Ray Simon, Inc. was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision that Ray Simon, Inc. (hereinafter RSI), a communications company engaged in the production of audiovisual presentations, exercised sufficient direction and control over claimant, a production assistant, to establish her status as an employee *(see, Matter of Gentile Nursing Servs. [Roberts],*65 NY2d 622; *954
      *Matter of Bertsch [Intertek Servs. Corp.—Hartnett],*159 AD2d 898). RSI preferred that claimant perform her work on its premises using its equipment, required claimant to submit time sheets noting her daily beginning and ending times, and oversaw the payment of claimant’s salary. In addition, claimant could not come and go as she pleased nor did she control her own attendance. Although there is evidence which could support a contrary conclusion, the record contains substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision and it should therefore be upheld *(see, Matter of CDK Delivery Serv. [Hartnett],*151 AD2d 932, 933). RSI’s remaining contention has been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Casey, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, with costs to claimant.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12227Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Derek Boyd Hankerson (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 12, 2023 - 2:16pmThis is excellent and I really appreciate you all highlighting AOC staff and what they do to make the capitol shine, look pretty and more inviting for us all.
I remember as young intern I would always make it a point (regardless of how important I thought I was at 19) to say hello and thank you to the AOC,  cafeteria staff, and other non-political staff!
Today, some 38 years late I still say thank you for making our U.S. Capitol look beautiful.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Awards and Facilities Committee (A&F) hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a meeting for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the National Science Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE: 

Tuesday, November 28, 2023, from 1:00:-5:00 p.m. Eastern. The open portion is from 1:00-1:30 p.m. The closed portion is from 1:30-5:00 p.m.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held virtually and in person at NSF headquarters, 2145 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314, and by videoconference.

# STATUS: 

Portions open and closed as described below.

      ( print page 82919)    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda of the open portion of the meeting is: Committee chair's Opening Remarks; Next Generation Very Large Array Briefing.

*The agenda of the closed portion of the meeting is:*                         Committee Chair's Opening Remarks regarding the agenda; Annual Report of the Chief Officer for Research Facilities; Antarctic Research Season Briefing; Discussion and vote on Leadership-Class Computing Facility Construction Award; Discussion of U.S. Extremely Large Telescope Program.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Michelle McCrackin,                         *mmccrack@nsf.gov,*                         (703) 292-7000. Members of the public can observe the public portion of this meeting through a YouTube livestream. The link is:                         *https://www.youtube.com/​watch?​v=​dU9-rjFpghM.*                         Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Christopher Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2023-26207 Filed 11-22-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE III

EQUALITY

EQUALITY

Article 25

The rights of the elderly

The Union recognises and respects the rights of the elderly to lead a life of dignity and independence and to participate in social and cultural life.

---
Exhibit 32.01
 Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed on May 13, 2009
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Richard J. GirominiRichard J. GirominiPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2009/s/ Robert J. SmithRobert J. SmithSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 13, 2009
40 P.3d 971

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Siamani

23648

12/11/2001

Affirmed