alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 19 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 8, 2015. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3) to approve the Keystone XL Pipeline. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill 

are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided among and controlled by the chair and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the chair and ranking minority 

member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) 

one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 30) to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 30-hour 

threshold for classification as a full-time employee for purposes of the employer mandate in the Patient Protection and 
2 

•HRES 19 EH 

Affordable Care Act and replace it with 40 hours. All points 

of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill 

shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment 

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00493

- CV

V. R. , Appellant

v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. C210010CPS , THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH WATKINS , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

V.R . (Father) appeals from the trial court ’ s order of termination following a bench

trial. 1 See Tex. Fam. Code § 161.001. The trial court found by clear and convincing evidence
that statutory gro u nds for terminating his parental rights existed and that termination was in his

child M.R

. ’ s best interest. See id. § 161.001(b)(1) (E), ( M ), ( Q ), (2).

On appeal, Father ’ s court

- appointed attorney has filed a brief concluding that his

appeal is frivolou s and without merit. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);
Taylor v. Texas Dep ’ t of Protecti ve & Regulatory Servs. , 160 S.W.3d 641, 646

– 47 (Tex. App.

— Austin 2005, pet. denied) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental
rights). The brief meets the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of

1 W e refer to appellant by his initials o r as Father and his child by the child ’ s initials. S

ee Tex. Fam. Code § 109.002(d); Tex. R. App. P. 9.8. The parental rights of the child ’ s mother also were terminated in the order of termination , but she has not appealed.2 the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See

386 U.S. at 744; Taylor , 160 S.W.3d at 646

– 47. Father ’ s attorney has certified to this Court that
he provided a copy of the Anders brief to Father and informed hi m of his right to examine the

appellate record and to file a pro se brief. To date, Father has not filed a pro se brief.
Upon receiving an Anders brief, we mu s t conduct a full examination of the
proceedings to determine whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. Pens on v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988). We have reviewed the entire record, including the Anders brief submitted on Father ’ s
behalf, and have found noth i n g that would arguably support an appeal. Our review included the

trial court ’ s endangerment finding
, see Tex. Fam. Code § 161.001(b)(1) (E), and we have found

no issues that could be raised on appeal with respect to this finding
, see In re N.G. , 577 S.W. 3 d 230
, 237 (Tex. 2019). We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, we

affirm the trial court ’ s order of termination

. 2

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin , Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Affirmed

Filed: October 18, 2022

2 We deny Father ’ s couns el ’ s m otion to withdraw as attorney of record. See In re P.M.
, 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam). If Father, after consulting with counsel, desires to file a petition for review, his counsel should timely file with the Texas Supreme Court “ a petit ion for review that satisfies the standards for an Anders brief. ” See id. at 27

– 28.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeWhat We DoMajor Projects
U.S. Capitol Visitor Center Entrance Landscape Restoration
        
                  The Basics
      
Location
    U.S. Capitol Grounds
          U.S. Capitol Visitor Center
          U.S. Capitol Building

                  View on Map
            
Status
    Completed
End Date
    2024This project replaced trees at the U.S. Capitol Visitor Center (CVC) entry to recapture the historic design intent and restore the historic character and contributing features of the original Olmsted landscape within the context of the current landscape conditions.

The area now provides a similar experience as that provided by the historic Olmsted landscape along the East Capitol Street extension with respect to framing the view of the U.S. Capitol and providing canopy shade along the path.

The project scope included the planting of new trees on each side at the north and south lawn panels adjacent to the CVC. Additional work to support the tree planting and design included removal of five existing trees, soil amendment, new turf and ground cover, and the removal of existing irrigation and installation of new irrigation.

**This project was completed in 2024.**
          
    
      

      We love our jobs. Do you? Come work with us.
        View Job Listings Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       7,924,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,519,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                    88,364
<INVENTORY>                                  7,233,498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,074,875
<PP&E>                                       2,643,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                 935,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,409,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,946,734
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       176,111
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,153,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,409,102
<SALES>                                     20,940,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,940,413
<CGS>                                        6,080,358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,174,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,766,145
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,583,154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,182,991
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,182,991
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel Chemosensory P50 
Review.
    Date: January 31, 2013.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sheo Singh, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, 
Executive Plaza South, Room 400C, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-496-8683, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5b6acaba2adb685abaca1a6a1ebabacadeba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dcafb5b2bbb4af9cb2b5b8bfb8f2b2b5b4f2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, SBIR Review Meeting.
    Date: February 5, 2013.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Sheo Singh, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, 
Executive Plaza South, Room 400C, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-496-8683, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f3809a9d949b80b39d9a979097dd9d9a9bdd949c85"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fa8993949d9289ba94939e999ed4949392d49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 31, 2012.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-00087 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
20877

#### State v. Taylor

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Landing of the Pilgrims, 1620, Relief Sculpture

One of four relief panels featuring scenes from American colonial history.
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Enrico Causici

Materials
    Sandstone

Year
    1825

Location
      
Above the East Door

Capitol Rotunda

Above each of the four Rotunda doors in the U.S. Capitol are scenes from the history of the American Colonies carved in relief into the sandstone walls. The three sculptors who decorated the Rotunda were employed during the rebuilding of the Capitol after the fire of 1814.

Between the historic scenes, decorative panels of wreaths and portraits, also in relief, circle the Rotunda walls. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Martin v. State

27836

02/15/2007

Affirmed
89 P.3d 534

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Santos

24549

04/14/2004

Affirmed, vacated & remanded
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of Albert Mangels, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County,

April 17, 1959.

*George Dyson Friou,*petitioner.

*Robert W. Tasker*as special guardian.

Edgar F. Hazelton, S.

In his homespun self-styled testament the testator provided: “I hereby give devise and bequeath to my Beloved daughter, Lillian Louise Kruse, the full use of all income from my business and real estate, stock and all other resources where so ever derived from, to be used by her during her natural life and at her death the same then to be.divided between my children as Lillian Louise Kruse sees fit to certain, children as I have explained to her, as follows: ”

Then follow the names of the seven other children.

*452. Petitioner now seeks a construction of the aforesaid provision and a determination as to whether the purported power of appointment set forth therein is effective.

Section 135 of the Real Property Law defines a special power as one in which the persons or class of persons to whom the disposition of property is to be made, are designated. I find that under the provision of the will under consideration, the testator intended to and did confer a special power of appointment under which his daughter, Lillian Louise Kruse,- was empowered to dispose of the property therein mentioned among the testator’s other children in such manner as she might determine by her will. The qualification “ as I have explained to her ” is precatory in nature and is not binding upon the donee, who could exercise the power in favor of any or all of the persons designated. (Real Property Law, § 158.)

Settle decree on notice accordingly.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1472 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To rename the Homestead National Monument of America 

near Beatrice, Nebraska, as the Homestead National 

Historical Park. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 1472 RFS

1 SECTION 1. HOMESTEAD NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first section of the Act of 

3 March 19, 1936 (16 U.S.C. 450u), is amended by striking 

4 ‘‘designated’’ and all that follows through the end and in5 serting ‘‘designated the ‘Homestead National Historical 

6 Park’.’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the unit of the National Park System known 

10 as ‘‘The Homestead National Monument of America’’ 

11 shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Homestead 

12 National Historical Park’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 20, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.7


 





HL Acquisitions Corp.


499 Park Avenue, 12th Floor


New York, New York 10022


 


June 27, 2018


 


Metropolitan Capital Partners II, LP


499 Park Avenue, 12th Floor


New York, New York 10022


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that,
commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of HL Acquisitions
Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial
business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier
date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Metropolitan Capital Partners II, LP shall make
available to the Company certain office space, administrative, bookkeeping and support services as may be required by the Company
from time to time, situated at 499 Park Avenue, 12th Floor, New York, New York 10022 (or any successor location). In
exchange therefor, the Company shall pay Metropolitan Capital Partners II, LP the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date
and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Metropolitan Capital Partners II, LP hereby agrees that it does not
have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in the trust account (the “Trust
Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO as a result of this letter agreement (the “Claim”)
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, this letter agreement and will not seek
recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 	 
	 	HL ACQUISITIONS CORP.
	 	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Jeffrey E. Schwarz
	 	 	Name: 	Jeffrey E. Schwarz     
	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer



 

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


METROPOLITCAN CAPITAL
PARTNERS II, LP


By: KJ Advisors Inc.,
its General Partner 


 


	By: 	/s/ Jeffrey E. Schwarz	 
	 	Name: 	Jeffrey E. Schwarz	 
	 	Title:	President
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 22, 2005
/s/ John P. Manning   
John P. Manning 
Principal Executive Officer