alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
Blair Centennial Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Blair Maple

Year
    1969

Location
      
Capitol Square, S.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text of the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds
Commemorative Tree

*Acer saccharinum blairi*
(Blair Maple)

In Commemoration of the Centennial of Blair, Nebraska

Sponsored by
Representative Glenn Cunningham

May 1, 1969
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    Photo of plaque.

      Previous Image
        Next Image

          Photo of plaque. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# L_2012112EN.01008801.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ANNEX VII

Specific commitments undertaken by the Republic of Croatia in the accession negotiations (referred to in Article 36(1), second subparagraph, of the Act of Accession)

Specific commitments undertaken by the Republic of Croatia in the accession negotiations (referred to in Article 36(1), second subparagraph, of the Act of Accession)

| 1. | To continue to ensure effective implementation of its Judicial Reform Strategy and Action Plan. |
| --- | --- |

1.

To continue to ensure effective implementation of its Judicial Reform Strategy and Action Plan.

| 2. | To continue to strengthen the independence, accountability, impartiality and professionalism of the judiciary. |
| --- | --- |

2.

To continue to strengthen the independence, accountability, impartiality and professionalism of the judiciary.

| 3. | To continue to improve the efficiency of the judiciary. |
| --- | --- |

3.

To continue to improve the efficiency of the judiciary.

| 4. | To continue to improve the handling of domestic war crimes cases. |
| --- | --- |

4.

To continue to improve the handling of domestic war crimes cases.

| 5. | To continue to ensure a sustained track record of substantial results based on efficient, effective and unbiased investigation, prosecution and court rulings in organised crime and corruption cases at all levels including high level corruption, and in vulnerable sectors such as public procurement. |
| --- | --- |

5.

To continue to ensure a sustained track record of substantial results based on efficient, effective and unbiased investigation, prosecution and court rulings in organised crime and corruption cases at all levels including high level corruption, and in vulnerable sectors such as public procurement.

| 6. | To continue to improve its track record of strengthened prevention measures in the fight against corruption and conflict of interest. |
| --- | --- |

6.

To continue to improve its track record of strengthened prevention measures in the fight against corruption and conflict of interest.

| 7. | To continue to strengthen the protection of minorities, including through effective implementation of the Constitutional Act on the Rights of National Minorities (CARNM). |
| --- | --- |

7.

To continue to strengthen the protection of minorities, including through effective implementation of the Constitutional Act on the Rights of National Minorities (CARNM).

| 8. | To continue to address outstanding refugee return issues. |
| --- | --- |

8.

To continue to address outstanding refugee return issues.

| 9. | To continue to improve the protection of human rights. |
| --- | --- |

9.

To continue to improve the protection of human rights.

| 10. | To continue to cooperate fully with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. |
| --- | --- |

10.

To continue to cooperate fully with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.

---
# hoals 

# •7
May9, 2012 Mr
. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE, Washington, D.C. 20590 Reference; DOT-OST-2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-Q305, 2000-7856 :) /-**)** c


### ·-**~)** 

### '-'

Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS, Tupelo, MS and Muscle Shoals, AL EAS Dear Mr. DeVany, Shoals Hospital in Muscle Shoals, Alabama wishes to lend its supportto the proposal ofSilver Airways to provide essential air service at Muscle Shoals, ALas replacement for current Delta Air Lines service. Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air transportation system is critical to the economic well being of Muscle Shoals, ALand to Shoals Hospital. We at Shoals Hospital rely on our local air service for both business and leisure travel. The Silver Airways proposals offer us a modern 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta, which is not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a popular business and leisure travel destination from Muscle Shoals, AL in its own right. We believe the Silver air service proposals represent the best option for retaining our local air service longterm and building up traffic so thatgovernmentsubsidies can eventually be reduced oreliminated. We urge the Department ofTransportation to award SilverAirways the designation to provide Muscle Shoals, AL's essential air service
. With kindest regards, I am,

P.O
. Box 3359 • 20! Avalon Avenue· Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 ·Phone: (256) 386-!60! ·Fax: (256) 386-!575
#### State v. Hatori

24331

08/29/2003

Affirmed
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                  [Letterhead of Beckman Kirkland and Whitney]



               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



We have issued our report dated December 13, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Certron
Corporation and subsidiary on Form 10-K for the years ended October 31,2001 and
2000. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statement of Certron Corporation and subsidiary on Form S-8 (File
No. 33-27930).


BECKMAN KIRKLAND & WHITNEY

Los Angeles, California
January 28, 2002
#### Chasteen v. Chun

16891

9/06/95

Affirmed
Opinion issued April 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00265-CV

———————————

SW SERVICE CENTER 1, L.P. AND SW SERVICE CENTER 2, L.P., 

Appellants

V.

HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2011-56200

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, SW Service Center 1, L.P. and SW Service Center 2, L.P., have

filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. No opinion has issued. 

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALISA McKENNEY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., 

an entity; DOES, 1-40, inclusive,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-56230

D.C. No. 3:12-cv-00990-CAB-WMC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 9, 2015 

Pasadena, California

Before: BENAVIDES,** TASHIMA, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges. 

FILED

APR 20 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Fortunato P. Benavides, Senior Circuit Judge for the

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.
Alissa McKenney appeals the district court’s judgment on the pleadings for

the United Parcel Service. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and

affirm.

McKenney’s claims under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act

(FEHA) with respect to her 2008 transfer and demotion to supervisor were barred

by the one-year statute of limitations. Cal. Gov’t Code § 12960(d). Her lack of

knowledge does not preserve these claims because she filed her complaint more

than one year and 90 days after the 2008 transfer. See Cal. Gov’t Code §

12960(d)(1). The continuing violations doctrine also does not apply because her

2008 transfer obtained a degree of permanence. Richards v. CH2M Hill, Inc., 26

Cal. 4th 798, 823 (2001) (determining the continuing violations doctrine applies

when an employer’s multiple unlawful actions are sufficiently similar in kind,

occur with reasonable frequency, and have not acquired a degree of permanence).

By failing to replead her failure to accommodate and failure to engage in the

interactive process FEHA claims with respect to her December 2010 conversation

with Thompson and Kocheck, McKenney voluntarily dismissed and therefore

waived these claims. Lacey v. Maricopa Cnty., 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012).

McKenney failed to allege sufficient facts to state claims for disability

discrimination, gender discrimination, or retaliation. She never alleged that she

2
applied for or was rejected from any particular open manager positions since her

December 2010 conversation, or that UPS used a system that did not provide for

applications. McKenney also failed to allege that Kocheck, who purportedly said

she would not be promoted until she dropped her legal challenges, had control over

promotions. As a result, McKenney did not allege sufficient facts to establish an

adverse employment action, a necessary component of all three claims.

Because McKenney already had an opportunity to amend her complaint, the

district court did not err in dismissing her complaints with prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

3
Exhibit 32.2 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFG Investment Trust C (the Trust), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Trusts Managing Trustee, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 
 /s/ Richard K Brock
 Richard K Brock
 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of AFG ASIT Corp.,
 the Managing Trustee of the Trust
 (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 August 13, 2004
### AgEAgle, Neodesha, KS 66757 www.AgEagle.com 620

- 332

-9264

**APPENDIX**

**__ SUMMARY	OF	SECTION	333	EXEMPTION	REQUEST** 

Becks provides	a	summary	of	its	exemption	application	to	allow	commercial	operation	of its	UASs precision	agriculture,	crop	scouting,	land	inspection,	agricultural	mapping,	and agricultural	data collection.	An	exemption	is	requested	from	the	following	regulations:

14	CFR	p art	21 14	CFR	part	27 14	CFR	§ 43.7 14	CFR	§ 45.23 14	CFR	§ 45.25 14	CFR	§ 45.27 14	CFR	§ 45.29 14	CFR	§ 61.113 14	CFR	§ 61.315 14	CFR	§ 91.7 14	CFR	§ 91.9 14	CFR	§ 91.103 14 CFR	§ 91.105 14	CFR	§ 91.109 14	CFR	§ 91.119 14	CFR	§ 91.121 14	CFR	§ 91.151 14	CFR	§ 91.203 14	CFR	§ 91.215 14	CFR	§§	91.401

– 91.417
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Kahapea

27278

08/30/2006

Denied

111 Hawai'i 267, 141 P.3d 440
## NUMBER 13

- 2 1

- 0 0 1 16

- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

HOLLAND D. JONES

, Appellant

,

v.

ANGELA THOMAS, INDIVIDUALLY, MIKE TISDALE, INDIVIDUALLY AND

ASPECT BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC

, Appellee s

.

_

___________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 458 th District Court

of For t Bend County, Texas.

_

___________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva2 This matter is before the C ourt on its own motion. 1 On October 15

, 2021, the C lerk

of the C ourt notified appellant that , pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), the appeal was

subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless

, within ten days

, appellant provided

reasonable explanation for his failure to timely file a brief

. Appellant failed to respond to

the notice and has not filed a brief.

Appellant has neither reasonably explain ed his failure to file a motion for extension

of time n or file d his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution

.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a), 42.3(b) ,(c)

.

CLARISSA SILVA

Justice

D elivered and filed on the

18th day of November , 202 1

.

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the First Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 73.001.
From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Lowry, Nick (OST) 

Thursday, February 14, 2013 1:49 PM 

Don Hainbach (dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com); Erin Tallardy (etallardy@ggh-airlaw.com) 

B. Edelman (bedelman@hbs.edu); Podberesky, Samuel (OST); Graber, Kimberly (OST); 

Dockets Mail 

B. Edelman v. British Airways Pic, Dkt DOT -OST -2013-0025 

This notice is In reference your motion of February 11, 2013. 

By a motion dated February 11, 2013, Counsel for British Airways, Pic, requested al") extension of time in which to 

prepare an answer in the above-referenced third-party complaint to March 22, 2013. The Respondent's motion advises 

that the Complainant was contacted and has no objection to grant ofthe request. 

This office has decided to grant for good cause the requested extension. This notice is issued under authority 

assigned in 14 CFR 302.405(a). 

Note to Dockets: Please place this e-mail in Dkt DOT-OST-2013-0025. 

Nicholas Lowry 

Senior Attorney 

Office of Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings 

Office of the General Counsel 

U.S. Dept. ofTransportation 

202-366-9351 (ph) 

1
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
H. Res. 305 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 11, 2015. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

1314) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a right to an administrative appeal relating to adverse determinations of tax-exempt status of certain organizations, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in 

the House, without intervention of any point of order, a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Ways and 

Means or his designee that the House concur in the Senate 

amendment. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be 

considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one 

hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening motion. The question 

of adoption of the motion shall be divided as follows: first, 

concurring in section 212 of the Senate amendment; second, 

concurring in the matter comprising the remainder of title II 
2 

•HRES 305 EH 

of the Senate amendment; and third, concurring in the matter preceding title II of the Senate amendment. The portion 

of the divided question on concurring in section 212 of the 

Senate amendment shall be considered as adopted. The Chair 

shall first put the question on the portion of the divided question on concurring in the matter comprising the remainder of 

title II of the Senate amendment. If any portion of the divided question fails of adoption, then the House shall be considered to have made no disposition of the Senate amendment. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 644) to 

amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend and expand the charitable deduction for contributions of 

food inventory, with the Senate amendments thereto, and to 

consider in the House, without intervention of any point of 

order, a single motion offered by the chair of the Committee 

on Ways and Means or his designee that the House: (1) concur in the Senate amendment to the title; and (2) concur in 

the Senate amendment to the text with the amendment printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution modified by the amendment printed in 

part B of that report. The Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair 
3 

•HRES 305 EH 

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 

Means. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the motion to its adoption without intervening motion or 

demand for division of the question. If the motion is adopted, 

then it shall be in order for the chair of the Committee on 

Ways and Means or his designee to move that the House insist on its amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R. 644 

and request a conference with the Senate thereon. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Carolyn Heinlen (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 16, 2021 - 5:06amI am so moved by the staff's comments in this post.  Each in it's own way saying I love my country; I take pride in the contribution I make.  This is the spirit that makes America what it is meant to be, and gives me hope for the future.  Thank you all so much.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group; Kidney, Urologic and Hematologic Diseases D Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         March 5-7, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         5:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jason D. Hoffert, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9010,                         *hoffertj@niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 21, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-26126 Filed 11-27-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P