alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4728-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Illinois (FEMA-4728-DR), dated August 15, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued October 23, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Illinois is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of August 15, 2023.

Calhoun and Logan Counties for Public Assistance.

                        The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,                               ( print page 83564)                            Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.                    

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-26280 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
67 P.3d 829

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### Glenayre Electronics, Inc. v. General Telcourier, Inc.

24670

02/03/2003

Affirmed and remanded in part
June 11, 2015 

Mr. David Holt 

GPServ, Inc. 

621 Brookhaven Drive 

Orlando, FL 32803 

Dear Mr. Holt: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 26, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1914), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeAbout UsWork With UsCareers
Application Process
Please read the information below on how to find and apply for job opportunities and internships with the Architect of the Capitol (AOC).
        
                  Image

The Architect of the Capitol Talent Acquisition and Classification Branch (TAC) issues vacancy announcements for job opportunities that are filled through a competitive process. Vacancy announcements are posted daily Monday through Friday through the AOC's electronic application system. The vacancy announcements provide job seekers with detailed information regarding the position and qualification requirements.

All AOC vacancy announcements will be advertised through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management's website at USAJOBS:

View and apply to current vacanciesTo receive notifications of job postings, please subscribe to our email list. You may also follow our @AOCHiring account on X and our company on LinkedIn.

**For help with technical difficulties when applying, applicants should contact the Monster Hiring Management Help Desk at 1.866.656.6831 or [email protected].**

Job seekers may visit the AOC Employment Center to search for AOC jobs and to apply online using computer terminals available, Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The AOC Employment Center is located across the street from the Federal Center SW Metro Station at:

AOC Employment Center
	Ford House Office Building, Room H2-178
	441 2nd & D Streets, SW
	Washington, DC 20515**For general information, job seekers may call 202.226.7000.** Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Paul C. McDonnel, Chief Financial Officer of Arrowhead Research
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 10, 2009



/S/    PAUL C.
MCDONNELPaul C. McDonnelChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed original of these written statements required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to Arrowhead Research Corporation and will be retained by Arrowhead Research Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COUNTY COURT — KINGS COUNTY.

December, 1922.

#### THE PEOPLE v. 3 100 GALLON STILLS AND 1 CONDENSER, AND JOHN DOE.

(119 Misc. 635.)

Search warrant — Omission op judge’s name on copy technical error ONLY AND AMENDABLE-CODE CbIM. PRO., § 802-b.

The omission from the copy of a search warrant issued under section 802-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure, of the name of the judge who signed the original warrant, is purely a technical error and is amendable by service of a new notice fixing another date for the hearing.

Motion to vacate a search warrant.

*John*E. Ruston, *District Attorney (John Moore,*of counsel), for People.

*Frederick*Hughes, for defendants.

Taylor, J.:

This is a motion to vacate a search warrant issued under section 802-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The ground of the motion is that the copy of the warrant and notice, delivered to the person from whose possession the property was taken, fails to show the name of the judge who signed the original warrant. Although not á true copy, I am inclined to think that this is one of the remedial errors covered by the amendment provisions of the statute in question. The purpose of delivering a copy of the warrant is to give notice of the forfeiture proceeding, so that the person from whose possession the property is taken may have an opportunity to appear and contest the same. (People v. Diamond, 199 App. Div. 497.) *223Such notice is essential, because obviously an ex parte disposition of property following seizure under search warrant would, in the absence of a conviction of the person from whose possession the goods were taken, violate such person’s constitutional right to due process of law. (Stuart v. Palmer, 74 N. Y. 183; Gilman v. Tucker, 128 id. 190; Coxe v. State, 144 id. 396; Colon v. Lisk, 153 id. 188; Matter of Grout, 105 App. Div. 98.)

However, the notice in this case contained all information necessary t,o enable the person from whom the goods were taken to attend and contest the forefeiture proceeding. The omission in the copy of the judge’s signature is a purely technical error. The proceeding being statutory, that omission might nevertheless furnish ground for an order vacating the warrant, were it not for the following saving provision in the statute: “ Such proceeding shall be heard and be‘determined upon the merits and shall not be dismissed of any technical defect, which may be corrected by amendment.” (See also People v. Wicka, 117 Misc. Rep. 364; Matter of Holcomb, Id. 356.) The amendment may be supplied by serving a new notice fixing another date for the hearing.

Motion denied.

Ordered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.8

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OFAMEREN ENERGY GENERATING
COMPANY(required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of Ameren Energy Generating
Company (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Warner L. Baxter, chief financial officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Form
10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of           the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 9, 2004

| |  | /s/ Warner L. Baxter
Warner L. BaxterExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
922 P.2d 974

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

August 27, 1996

10126

#### State v. Ragasa

Dismissed
SHARON KELLER

 PRESIDING JUDGE

LAWRENCE E. MEYERS

CHERYL JOHNSON

MIKE KEASLER

BARBARA P. HERVEY

ELSA ALCALA

BERT RICHARDSON

KEVIN P. YEARY

DAVID NEWELL

 JUDGES

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

(512) 463-1551

SIAN SCHILHAB

GENERAL COUNSEL

(512) 463-1597

SUPREME COURT BUILDING, 201 WEST 14TH STREET, ROOM 106, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701

WEBSITE WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/CCA.ASPX

April 15, 2015

2nd Court Of Appeals Clerk

Debra Spisak

401 W. Belknap, Ste 9000

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

371st District Court Presiding Judge

401 W Belknap

Fort Worth, TX 76196-7118

Debra Ann Windsor

Assistant District Attorney

401 W. Belknap

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

District Clerk Tarrant County

Thomas Wilder

401 W. Belknap

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Terry Barlow

1110 E. Weatherford

Fort Worth, TX 76102

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

District Attorney Tarrant County

Sharen Wilson

401 West Belknap

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: MILLER, CHRISTOPHER ADRIAN

CCA No. PD-0038-14 COA No. 02-12-00487-CR

Trial Court Case No. 1264863D

The court has issued an opinion on the above referenced cause number.

Sincerely,

_____________________________

Abel Acosta, Clerk

FILE COPY
20891

#### State v. Cottrell

Affirmed
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6082** 

JOSEPH A. BROWN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. CHARLES RATLEDGE, Warden

- USP Lee , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Elizabeth K
. Dillon , District Judge. ( 7:15

- cv - 00640

- EKD

- RSB )

Submitted : August 29, 2016 Decided: September 28, 2016

Before DUNCAN , FLOYD , and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Joseph A. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph A. Brown appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Un known Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) , for failure to comply with a court order
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Brown v. Ratled ge , No. 7:15

- cv - 00640

- EKD

- RSD (W.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2015)
. We deny as moot Brown’s motion to expedite his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Month

Sum of 

Consumed 

Bales Baled 

Lint

Sum of Baled Lint 

Net Pounds

Sum of Ending 

Inventory Baled 

Lint

Sum of Baled Lint 

Payment Amount

Sum of 

Consumed 

Bales Baled 

Loose

Sum of Baled 

Loose Net 

Pounds

Sum of 

Ending 

Inventory 

Baled Loose

Sum of Baled 

Loose 

Payment 

Amount

Oct 156,976.00 77,802,121.00 84,462.00 $2,334,063.63 8.00 3,760.00 68.00 $112.80

Nov 131,649.00 65,199,619.00 83,986.00 $1,955,988.57 26.00 12,220.00 42.00 $366.60

Dec 104,135.00 51,550,340.00 72,228.00 $1,546,510.20 8.00 3,760.00 34.00 $112.80

Jan 150,380.00 74,478,094.00 83,391.00 $2,234,342.82 18.00 8,460.00 16.00 $253.80

Feb 144,772.00 71,682,729.00 73,430.00 $2,150,481.87 135.00 66,568.00 121.00 $1,997.04

Grand Total 687,912.00 340,712,903.00 397,497.00 $10,221,387.09 195.00 94,768.00 281.00 $2,843.04

Month

Sum of 

Consumed 

Bales Reginned 

Motes

Sum of Reginned 

Motes Net Pounds

Sum of Ending 

Inventory 

Reginned Motes

Sum of Reginned 

Motes Payment 

Amount

Sum of 

Consumed 

Bales Semi 

Processed 

Motes

Sum of Semi 

Processed 

Motes Net 

Pounds

Sum of 

Ending 

Inventory 

Semi 

Processed 

Motes

Sum of Semi 

Processed 

Motes 

Payment 

Amount

Oct 4,408.00 2,187,442.00 8,897.00 $65,623.26 713.00 93,352.75 1,395.00 $2,800.58

Nov 3,777.00 1,878,095.00 7,973.00 $56,342.85 6,832.00 890,556.75 3,140.00 $26,716.70

Dec 4,244.00 2,079,678.00 6,084.00 $62,390.34 11,931.00 1,544,179.50 2,546.00 $46,325.39

Jan 4,462.00 2,188,647.00 7,051.00 $65,659.41 933.00 127,209.00 2,177.00 $3,816.27

Feb 3,083.00 1,498,617.00 6,204.00 $44,958.51 55.00 7,075.75 203.00 $212.27

Grand Total 19,974.00 9,832,479.00 36,209.00 $294,974.37 20,464.00 2,662,373.75 9,461.00 $79,871.21

Upland Monthly Cotton Consumption

Fiscal Year 2024 (October 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024)

Upland Cotton reported under the Economic Adjustment Assistance Program for Textile Mills (EAATM)
Month

Sum of Baled 

Lint Number of 

Bales

Sum of Baled 

Lint Net Pounds

Sum of Baled Lint 

Payment Amount

Sum of Loose 

Number of Bales

Sum of Loose Net 

Pounds Sum of Loose Payment Amount

October 442 218,800 $ - 0 0 $ -

November 632 312,459 $ - 0 0 $ -

December 525 260,243 $ - 0 0 $ -

January 974 482,957 $ - 0 0 $ -

February 667 330,393 $ - 0 0 $ -

March 350 174,301 $ - 0 0 $ -

Grand Total 3,590.00 1,779,153.00 $ - 0 0 $ -

ELS Monthly Cotton Consumption

Fiscal Year 2024 (October 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024)

Extra Long Staple Cotton reported under the Extra Long Staple (ELS) Cotton Competitiveness Payment Program
EXHIBIT 11
                             LASERSIGHT INCORPORATED
                          COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                   THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002


                                                    Three Months Ended
                                                         March 31,
                                                -------------  -------------
                                                      2003           2002
                                                -------------  -------------
BASIC AND DILUTED

     Weighted average shares outstanding           27,842,000     26,488,000
                                                 ============   ============

     Net loss                                    $ (2,410,745)    (5,078,942)

     Conversion discount on preferred stock          (483,837)            --
                                                 ------------   ------------
     Loss attributable to common shareholders      (2,894,582)    (5,078,942)

     Basic loss per share                        $      (0.10)         (0.19)
                                                 ============   ============

ADDITIONAL DILUTED CALCULATION

     Loss attributalbe to common
       shareholders, above                       $ (2,894,582)    (5,078,942)
                                                 ============   ============

     Additional adjustment to weighted
       average number of shares:

     Weighted average shares outstanding,
       above                                       27,842,000     26,488,000
     Dilutive effect of contingently
       issuable shares, stock options and
       convertible preferred stock                 18,578,000      1,284,000
                                                 ------------   ------------

     Weighted average number of shares,
       adjusted                                    46,420,000     27,772,000
                                                 ============   ============

     Diluted loss per share, adjusted            $      (0.06)(A)      (0.18)
                                                 ============   ============

---------------------------
 (A)  This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item
      601(b)(11)  although it is contrary to paragraph 13-14 of SFAS 128 because
      it produces an anti-dilutive result.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 23
- 00251
- CV IN THE MATTER OF M .B., A JUVENILE

From the 474th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023
- 19
- J
MEMORANDUM OPINION

L.M

. , M.B.’s mother, filed a pro se notice of appeal challenging a judgment adjudicating that M.B., a juvenile, engaged in delinquen t behavior that resulted in a disposition and order of probation , as well as an order that L.M. pay $5 per month for probat ion fees. By letter dated September 11, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified L.M. that the appeal is subject to dismissal because the original filing fee has not been paid.
See T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN
. § 56.01(b) (“The requirements governing an appeal [under the Juvenile Justice Code] are as in civil cases generally. When an appeal is sought by filing a notice of appeal, security for costs of appeal, or an affidavit of inability to pay the costs of appeal, and the filing is made in a timely fashion after the date the disposition order isM.B. v. State Page 2

signed, the appeal must include the juvenile court adjudication and all rulings contributing to that adjudication.”). The September 11, 2023 letter warned L.M. that the Court would dismiss the appeal unless, within twenty

- one day s from the date of the letter, she paid the filing fee or obtained indigent status for the purpose of this appeal. Twenty

- one days have passed, and L.M. has not paid the filing fee or notified this Court
that she has b een determined to be indigent . Accordingly , we dismiss this appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(c).

STEVE SMITH Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson , and Justice Smith (Chief Justice Gray dissents.) Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed October 26, 2023 [C V06 ]