alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Breadcrumb

1. Hogar

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

Commenting Opportunities: Plant

Health

Last Modified: 

Print

Tell us what you think!

As ecosystems evolve, our efforts to protect plant health need to evolve with them.

That’s why APHIS Plant Protection and Quarantine invites people like you to

participate in the decision-making and regulatory process. Check out this page for
opportunities for public comment, from pest and disease topics to risk management

and more.

Latest Commenting Opportunities

3/12/24

APHIS Seeks Public Comment on the Draft Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon

Cricket Suppression Program Environmental Assessment in Idaho

2/19/24

APHIS Invites U.S. Stakeholders to Comment on NAPPO Documents

7/25/23

USDA Reminds Stakeholders to Submit PPA-7721 Suggestions before the August 9,

2023, Deadline

7/10/23

USDA Reminds Stakeholders to Submit PPA-7721 Suggestions by August 9, 2023, for

the Plant Pest and Disease Management and Disaster Prevention Program

Send Suggestions on List of Diseases and Pests

Animal and Plant Diseases and Pests of Concern

For the 2018 Farm Bill, APHIS developed a list of 59 pests and diseases that pose the

most significant threat to U.S. agriculture. If you have information about a pest not

included on our list or has the potential to harm agriculture, please let us know here.

Related Links

APHIS: All Federal Register Posts

APHIS News and Updates

Stay in the Know

For the latest news about Plant Protection and Quarantine, sign up for email

updates.

Subscribe
#### State v. Rodriguez

23425

03/06/2003

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply379Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  sarah.davisPermalinkNovember 9, 2016 - 3:24pmHi Mike, the National Archives gives some insight on that here: https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2002/winter/travels-char...
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### State v. Aki

17611

10/23/96

Vacated in part and Affirmed
September 27, 2004

24113

#### Reinwald, O'Connor & Playdon v. Snyder

Affirmed
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Brian E. Dearing, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;Dated: June 14, 2006       By: /s/ Brian E. Dearing       By: Brian E. Dearing  Title: Chairman, President and CEO
Breadcrumb

1. Home

2. Print 

3. Pdf 

4. Node 

5. Entity Print 

NVSL: Lab-Related Forms

Last Modified: 

Print

The forms below are screen-fillable Adobe Acrobat PDF forms. You can fill out and

print the forms within your web browser.

Form ID Name

VS 10-4

Get Level 1 eAuthentication

Access the Electronic 10-4

Specimen Submission Form and Instructions

VS 10-4a

Specimen Submission Form

(continuation page)

VS 10-3

Get Level 1 eAuthentication

Access the Electronic 10-3

Request for Salmonella Serotyping

Form and Instructions

VS 5-38 Parasite Submission Form and Instructions

VS 10-7

Specimen Collection: Bovine Tuberculosis

Reactors, Suspects, Trace-Exposed

VS 6-35

Get Level 1 eAuthentication

Access the Electronic 6-35

Report of Thoracic Granulomas in Regular Kill

Animals

VS 4-54

Brucellosis Test Record Market Cattle Testing

Program
Form ID Name

VS 4-9

Request for Reagents or Supplies (with

instructions)

VS 5-14 Dip Sample Data

VS 17-31

VS 17-31 Sample Submission

Spreadsheet

Access the Electronic 17-31

Create an electronic 17-31 with

spreadsheet

Equine Import Testing Submission

VS 4-11 Request for Training at the NVSL

VS 17-131 USDA BSE Surveillance Data Collection Form

VS 17-146 USDA BSE Surveillance Submission Form

VS 17-146A

USDA BSE Surveillance Submission Continuation

Form

VS 4-8 Ivermectin Corn Submission Form

Worksheets Proficiency Test Worksheets

VS 4-12 (242.4 KB) NVSL Kit and Instrument Request Form

(see catalog)

VS 4-10 NVSL Customer Contact Information Update

Related Links

NVSL Home

About the NVSL

Diagnostic Testing

Reagents and Proficiency Tests

NCAH Portal Guidance for NVSL Submitters

NBAF Scientist Training Program
USDA
fei |
United States Department of Agriculture

Office of the Secretary
Washington D.C. 20250

AUG
Chairman Daniel R. Elliott III UG 8 2014

U.S. Surface Transportation Board
395 E Street, SW
Washington, DC 20423

Dear Chairman Elliott,

Thank you for your leadership in helping to address the current rail service issues affecting agricultural shippers.
The hearing in April; the follow-up field hearings; and the Board’s order on June 20, 2014, for BNSF Railways
(BNSF) and Canadian Pacific Railways Company (CP) to publicly file plans on how they will resolve their
backlogs of grain car orders were positive steps. USDA greatly appreciates your and the Board’s efforts to
resolve this serious situation as soon as possible. Despite some progress, however, USDA remains concerned
about CP’s ability to resolve its backlog and the lack of transparency in CP’s reporting to the Board. With
remaining grain in storage due to the backlog, grain elevators in some locations, such as South Dakota and
Minnesota, could run out of storage capacity during the upcoming harvest, requiring grain be stored on the ground
and running the risk of spoiling. The projected size of the upcoming harvest creates a high potential for loss in
the affected States.

USDA is concerned the pace of CP’s weekly progress on reducing the backlog of late grain cars is insufficient to
meet its obligation of fulfilling the 29,650 open requests for service before October. We estimate CP would need
to move about 4,725 cars per week to clear the grain backlog by October 3. This includes about 3,300 past due
cars and about 1,425 new requests per week, the weekly average of new requests in July. However, CP’s weekly
reports to the Board show it has only been moving an average of 1,969 cars per week in July, which would leave a
significant amount of the grain backlog remaining in October. I encourage the Board to seek clarification from
CP about its ability to clear the grain backlog by October and to explore remedies available to the Board should
CP be unable to meet its obligation.

Regarding the data reporting, since July 5, 2013, CP is the only Class I railroad not reporting its Railroad
Performance Measures through the Association of American Railroads. At the request of the Board, the Class I
railroads agreed to report these Railroad Performance Measures subsequent to the rail service difficulties of 1997
and 1998. These performance measures provide transparency and insight regarding the performance of individual
railroads at a broad level, and current rail service problems have highlighted the need for these measures. I
respectfully ask the Board to require CP report these numbers in the future.

Thank you for your consideration of these requests. Please let me know if I or my staff can be of any assistance.

Sincere!

Edward Avalos
Under Secretary
Marketing and Regulatory Programs

An Equal Opportunity Employer
EXHIBIT 32.1


           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing by Ionatron, Inc. (the "Company") of its Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report")
I, Thomas C. Dearmin, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

      (i)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii)  the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.


This  certificate  is being made for the exclusive  purpose of compliance by the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of Ionatron,  Inc. with the
requirements  of Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, and may not be
used  for any  other  purposes.  A signed  original  of this  written  statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Ionatron, Inc. and will be retained
by Ionatron, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                                   /s/ Thomas C. Dearmin
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 9, 2005
Exhibit 10.22

AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of September 12, 2006, to that Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2004 (the
Agreement) by and between Kevin Hyson (the Executive) and AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC. (the Company).

Effective as of the date first written above, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1. Paragraph 1a of the Agreement, as
amended, is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore:

Employment Term. The Company shall employ Executive until
April 17, 2008 (the Employment Term) on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Agreement shall be considered effective as of November 1, 2004 (the Effective Time).

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement and any subsequent amendments of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first written above.



AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC.By:

/s/ David PeckerDavid PeckerBy:

/s/ Kevin HysonKevin Hyson
97 P.3d 427

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

August 24, 2004

24715, 25256

#### State v. Peapealalo

Affirmed
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT Jul y 25, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 10678 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o ck etN o . 0 5 -8 0 1 2 4 -C R -W JZ U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s B R A N D O N C O N N O R S , D e f e n d an t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Ju l y 25, 2006) B efo re B L A C K , B A R K E T T an dP R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: K athl ee n W i l l i am s, appo i nt ed coun se l for B rand on C on no rs i n thi s di re ct2

c r i m i na l appe a l , ha s m ove d t o w i thdr aw f r om f urthe rr e pr e s e nt a t i on of the ap p e llan t an df

ile dab r ie f

p u r s u an t to A n d e r s v . C a lif o rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 , 8 7 S .C t. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L .E d .2 d4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 ) . O u rin d e p e n d e n t r e v ie w o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls th atco u n sel ’ s assessm en to f th e rel at i v e m eri to f th e ap p eal i s co rrect . B ecau se in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls n o ar g u ab le is s u e s o f m e r it, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and C onnor s ’ s c onvi c t i ons and se nt ence s are A FFI R M ED .
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 268 

Supporting the designation of July 2015 as Uterine Fibroids Awareness 

Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2015 

Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia (for himself, Ms. EDWARDS, and Ms. FUDGE) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of July 2015 as Uterine Fibroids 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas fibroids may cause significant morbidity through 

their presence in the uterus and pelvic cavity causing significant pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding, reproductive dysfunction, miscarriages, and even infertility; 

Whereas the pain, discomfort, stress, and other physical and 

emotional symptoms of living with fibroids may significantly interfere with a woman’s quality of life, compromising her ability to function normally, work or care for 

her family; and may lead to more severe health and 

wellness issues; 

Whereas uterine fibroids are the most prevalent medical condition affecting women, with an estimated 30 percent of 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 268 IH 

women developing a uterine fibroid by age 35, and 80 

percent of women developing a uterine fibroid by age 50; 

Whereas the exact number of affected women is unknown as 

detection and diagnosis is difficult as only 1 out of 4 

women who have a uterine fibroid tumor exhibit symptoms severe enough to require treatment; 

Whereas the overall incidence of uterine fibroid tumors is estimated to disproportionately and more severely impact 

Black and Hispanic women, resulting in an incidence rate 

that is 3 times greater in women with Black ancestry and 

2 times greater in Hispanic women compared to Caucasian women; 

Whereas a hysterectomy, or removal of the uterus, is among 

the most common surgical treatments for uterine fibroids 

and more than 200,000 hysterectomies are performed 

each year to treat uterine fibroids, at an estimated annual cost of more than $2 billion; 

Whereas uterine fibroid tumors were estimated to cost the 

United States $5.9 billion to $34.4 billion annually with 

an estimated annual lost work cost of $1.6 billion to 

$17.2 billion through absenteeism and short-term disability in women age 25 to 54; and 

Whereas public awareness and education campaigns on uterine fibroids prevention, screening, and symptoms are held 

during the month of July each year: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideas of Uterine 

3 Fibroids Awareness Month; 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 268 IH 

1 (2) recognizes the disparity in incidence rates of 

2 African-American and Hispanic uterine fibroid pa3 tients; 

4 (3) recognizes the need for greater research, 

5 treatment, and care options regarding uterine 

6 leiomyoma; and 

7 (4) encourages the President to issue a procla8 mation calling upon the people of the United States 

9 to observe the month with appropriate awareness 

10 and educational activities. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                SUBSIDIARIES OF STANDARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                PERCENTAGE OF    STATE OR COUNTRY IN
                     NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                          OUTSTANDING       WHICH ORGANIZED
                     ------------------                         -------------    -------------------
<S>                                                             <C>              <C>
Standard Life Insurance Company of Indiana..................         100%        Indiana
Dixie National Life Insurance Company.......................        99.3%        Mississippi
Standard Marketing Corporation..............................         100%        Indiana
Standard Marketing International, Ltd. .....................         100%        Bermuda
Standard Administrative Services, Inc. .....................         100%        Indiana
Standard Management International S.A. .....................         100%        Luxembourg
Premier Life (Luxembourg) S.A. .............................         100%        Luxembourg
Premier Life (Bermuda) Limited..............................         100%        Bermuda
Standard Development, LLC...................................          50%        Indiana
Standard Acquisition Corporation............................         100%        North Carolina
Standard Investor Services Corporation......................         100%        Indiana
</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Raymond O. Torr, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

March 25, 1959.

*279
      *Michael Baum*for Sophie Torr, petitioner.

*Joseph Giovanniello*for Margaret Griovanniello, respondent.

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The instrument propounded as the will of the decedent is dated January 14,1956. It bequeaths the entire estate to the decedent’s then wife but does not appoint an executor. The sole legatee named in the instrument petitions for its probate and seeks letters of administration with the will annexed. Objections to probate have been interposed by a daughter of the decedent.

A trial of the objections to probate has been had and the court is satisfied that the propounded instrument was duly executed in accordance with section 21 of the Decedent Estate Law, that the decedent was competent to make a will and that he was free from any restraint at the time the propounded paper was executed. The objections to the probate of the instrument are dismissed and it will be admitted to probate.

An objection of the daughter also refers to a separation agreement between the testator and his wife and a later divorce decree. Such objection contends that this agreement constituted a revocation of the will. While it is true that an instrument by which an estate or interest in property is altered may be so inconsistent with the terms and nature of a testamentary disposition of the same estate or property as to operate as a revocation of such disposition (Decedent Estate Law, §§ 39, 40; *Matter of Ga Nun,*200 Misc. 789, affd. 279 App. Div. 982), an instrument which fails to meet the requirements of section 34 of the Decedent Estate Law, does not effect a revocation of a will and a basis for denial of probate. Here, because the will fails to name an executor, the right of the divorced wife to letters of administration with the will annexed is dependent upon her interest in the estate as a legatee (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 133) and, consequently, a representative of the estate cannot be appointed until the status of the present petitioner, as alleged sole legatee, has been determined. The issue is whether the separation agreement renders the provisions of the will inoperative and, inasmuch as there appears to be no need to take addi*280tional proof as to the relations between the parties to the agreement, memoranda stating the contentions of the proponent and contestant may be submitted within two weeks from the date of publication of this opinion.

Proceed accordingly.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gus D. Halas, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of T-3 Energy Services, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.     */*s/ GUS D. HALAS     Gus D. Halas  Chief Executive Officer  July 30, 2007