alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Craig Thompson  (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 15, 2021 - 8:24pmTo all the Employees at the AOC,
      My son and I visited the Capitol in the Summer of 2019.  As a fan of history, I was and am in awe of the history surrounding the building and grounds.  I truly felt I was walking through history.  I watched many of the AOC's videos on YouTube.  The restoration of the dome was remarkable, and amazing.  Watching your work I can see the craftsmanship, professionalism, and pride that goes with each job at the AOC.    Your work is evident as I walked around the building and grounds.
When I heard the Capitol was stormed by protesters, I was hoping and praying none of the items that link us to our history were damaged.  I haven't heard if any of the statues in the Statuary Hall collection were damaged.   I have been hearing about what damage was done.  I am in shock that the protesters were yelling "This is our House" yet they damaged anything in their path.  I just wanted to stop and say,  Thank you for taking care of the building and grounds.  Your hard work bringing everything back to normal (as much as possible) is apperated.  Your efforts have not gone unnoticed.
Craig Thompson
Simi Valley, Ca
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
2015 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-21-2015

Michael Siluk, Jr. v. Catherine Merwin

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015

This April is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University

School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2015 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of

Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Michael Siluk, Jr. v. Catherine Merwin" (2015). 2015 Decisions. Paper 397.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015/397
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________

No. 11-3996

_______________

MICHAEL E. SILUK, JR.,

Appellant

v.

CATHERINE MERWIN, 

Director of Perry County Domestic Relations Section

________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(Civil Action No. 1-11-cv-01654)

District Judge: Honorable Judge Christopher C. Conner

________________

Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge and CHAGARES, GARTH,

Circuit Judges

________________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

________________

At the direction of the Court, the opinion filed April 

10, 2015 is hereby amended.

Page 4, footnote 5:

We have jurisdiction to review a district court’s final order 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Although Siluk is appealing the 

order dismissing his complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), he has 

filed a motion to consolidate court fees which is currently 

pending before the Court, we only need to discuss the latter 

issue. The District Court thoroughly and carefully explained 

that Siluk’s claim against an officer of the Commonwealth of 
2

Pennsylvania is barred by the Eleventh Amendment of the 

United States Constitution.

Page 5, paragraph 2:

Siluk appealed and applied to proceed IFP before us. He also 

filed a motion to combine payment of his filing fees which 

was referred to the merits panel.

An amended judgment will be issued.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: April 21, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          40,424
<SECURITIES>                                     4,036
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,859
<PP&E>                                           7,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,205
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,635
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,107
<SALES>                                          7,058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,758
<CGS>                                              296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (480)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,520)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        22
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,542)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,542)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of This Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Gunson

24209

03/18/2003

Granted

101 Hawai'i 161, 64 P.3d 290
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gus D. Halas, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of T-3 Energy Services, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       */*s/ GUS D. HALAS         Gus D. Halas    Chief Executive Officer    November 5, 2007
1 

### TSAI, YA-TING

From: James Payne <JPayne@morongo-nsn.gov>

Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 1:29 PM

To: TSAI, YA-TING

Subject: RE: Part 71 Permit Renewal Information Request

Attachments: PTE_Cogen.JPG

Good Afternoon Ms. Tsai,

Thank you for calling and the email, please find below and attached the responses to your questions; if I can provide any

further clarification, please just let me know.

Take care,

James Payne, GISP

Environmental Director

Morongo Band of Mission Indians

951.755.5298 - office

951.316.0027 - cell

33°56'14.0721" N

116°48'33.5025" W

From: TSAI, YA

‐ TING [mailto:Tsai.Ya

‐ Ting@epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 10:24 AM

To: James Payne <JPayne@morongo

‐ nsn.gov>

Subject: Part 71 Permit Renewal Information Request

Good morning Mr. Payne,

I was just assigned Morongo’s Part 71 permit renewal and I have a few questions after reviewing your submitted

package. These are mostly administrative questions.

‐ Was the casino originally in Banning and now the area is called Cabazon? The casino has always been in

Cabazon, the administrative offices of the Tribe are located within Banning.

‐ Any new constructions/modifications since 2010? (for example, gas stations) There have been none.

‐ Under Section G of the application package, is the 1,500 Btu/scf a typo? (1005 Btu/scf?) You are correct, it

should be 1,005 Btu/scf.

‐ Under Section G of the application package, is 130, Btu/gal a typo? (130,000 Btu/gal?) Correct again, it is

another typo and should be 130,000

‐ For Form EUD

‐ 1, is the fuel type under Section C for EG

‐ 5, EG

‐ 6, and EG

‐ 7 a typo? (Diesel?) Engines 5, 6, and 7

are the emergency/backup generators and are fueled by diesel.

‐ Please provide a copy of your PTE calculations showing how the calculations were done. Some of the numbers

are slightly different from year to year, I just want to double check to see if they are due to rounding. I have

attached the original calculations for PTE. I looked back and did see a minimal variance for the HAP as well,

which yes would have been due to rounding.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Thank you,2 Sheila (Ya

‐ Ting) Tsai

Air Permits Office (AIR

‐ 3)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

(415) 972

‐ 3328

Tsai.Ya

‐ Ting@epa.gov
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply442Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Melinda Hilema... (not verified)PermalinkJuly 3, 2014 - 9:13amLove this info.  I wonder if my husband knows about this?  He worked for AOC. For 35 years.  Very very interesting!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                           Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DynTek, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge and upon a review of the Report that:

(1)      the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Executive Officer, my own due diligence and representations made by
certain members of the Company's senior management.

Dated: February 17, 2004                /s/ James Linesch
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        James Linesch
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 30, 2019

t0422

Order 

Clerk

April 30, 2019

157360 & (42)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157360

COA: 335439

Kent CC: 15-010506-FH

DARRIS ANTHONY PHARMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for articulation of its reasons for finding a 

lack of merit in the questions presented in the defendant’s supplemental brief, filed under 

AO 2004-6 (Minimum Standards for Indigent Criminal Appellate Defense Services), 

Standard 4, as part of his appeal of right. In all other respects, leave to appeal is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be 

reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS CUSMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERNECE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 30, 1997
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,653,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,044,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,697,372
<PP&E>                                      63,405,182
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,776,635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,364,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          551,330
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,812,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,364,211
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,743,047
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,009,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   790,446
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31

           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 OF THE
      SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory Ofiesh, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Franklin Lake
Resources Inc.:

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or cause such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
     including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
     within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
     quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
     of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


Dated:  September 20, 2004

                                               By: /s/  Fr. Gregory Ofiesh
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Fr. Gregory Ofiesh
                                               President and CEO
                                               Acting Chief Financial Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 982 

To ensure that any authority of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund to 

borrow amounts from the Treasury is used only to pay mortgage insurance claims. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2015 

Mr. CAPUANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To ensure that any authority of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund to borrow amounts from the Treasury is 

used only to pay mortgage insurance claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘End Unnecessary Bor5 rowing Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF BORROWING AUTHORITY. 

7 Paragraph (2) of section 205(f) of the National 

8 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1711(f)(2)) is amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(2)’’; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 982 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub2 paragraphs: 

3 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) may not be construed 

4 to authorize or require the Secretary to borrow any 

5 amounts to comply with the capital ratio require6 ment under such subparagraph. 

7 ‘‘(C) Notwithstanding any other provision of 

8 law, any authority of the Secretary under this Act 

9 or otherwise to borrow amounts from the Treasury 

10 of the United States for the Mutual Mortgage Insur11 ance Fund may be used only to the extent necessary 

12 to pay claims on mortgage insurance that is an obli13 gation of such Fund.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS