alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.6**

** **

**CEO AND CFO SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

February 1, 2017

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

Luc Jobin, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Ghislain Houle, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, of Canadian National Railway Company, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.                    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Canadian National Railway Company.

 
| /s/ Luc Jobin                         |   | /s/ Ghislain Houle           |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
| Luc Jobin                             |   | Ghislain Houle               |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive Vice-President and |
|                                  |   | Chief Financial Officer      |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          72,160                  56,359
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0               2,689,893
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0               1,204,321
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                          72,160               4,315,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,203,987              20,908,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,972,375              22,839,582
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       146,071                 117,018
<OTHER-SE>                                 (14,914,459)             (7,449,455)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,203,987              20,908,198
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,183                 176,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (135,183)               (176,148)
<DISCONTINUED>                              (3,016,501)             (4,407,130)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,151,684)             (4,583,278)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.17)                   (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.22)                   (.57)
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Middleton

17521

9/23/96

Reversed
#### In the Matter of Herbert C. Haber, Petitioner, against Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

February 4, 1959.

*Hood é Schwarts*for petitioner.

*Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney-General, for*respondent.

Samuel H. Hofstadter, J.

Respondent has cross-moved for dismissal of the petition. Petitioner is a licensed agent under *205sections 114' and 115 of the Insurance Law. He complains of section 8 of regulation 27b, which, if enforced against him, will adversely affect his business. He contends that the regulation is legislative, arbitrary and in excess of jurisdiction, and has brought this article 78 proceeding for its review and for a temporary injunction. The sole contention raised in support of the cross motion is that the petition is insufficient in law, in that an action for declaratory judgment is the proper remedy rather than a proceeding for review, in the absence of any specific action taken in pursuance of the regulation.

Prior to its amendment, effective April 20, 1956, the first sentence of section 34 of the Insurance Law read: “ Whenever by the provisions of this chapter *any order or other act*of the superintendent is declared to be subject to judicial review at the suit of any person, such person may maintain a proceeding under article seventy-eight of the civil practice act.” (Italics supplied.)

Hpon its amendment, it now reads: “Notwithstanding the specific enumerations of the right to judicial review in this chapter, *any order, regulation or decision*of the superintendent is declared to be subject to judicial review as permitted in a proceeding under article seventy-eight of the civil practice act.” (Italics supplied.) This legislative action was suggested in the opinion of Fuld, J., in *Matter of Guardian Life Ins. Co.*v. *Bohlinger*(308 N. T. 174,183).

The point of the suggestion that the amendment did not alter the character of an article 78 proceeding escapes the court. It is enough that the Legislature has declared that an article 78 proceeding is available where a regulation is the subject of the review sought. The amendment does not require that only action taken in pursuance of the regulation be thus reviewed. If that were the intent, the object would have been attained by provision for review of any order or decision and without the inclusion of a regulation.

The cross motion is denied, with leave to the respondent to answer within 10 days.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,123,059
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  637,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,760,526
<PP&E>                                      22,420,356
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,699,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,481,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          306,949
<BONDS>                                      3,655,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,518,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,481,576
<SALES>                                      1,179,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,207,732
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,015,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                148,442
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            148,442
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   148,442
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                          28,662
<SECURITIES>                                    39,353
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,718
<INVENTORY>                                     12,694
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,038
<PP&E>                                          50,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,286
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           305
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,668
<SALES>                                        108,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,017
<CGS>                                           48,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,571
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   976
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (5,696)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,104)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,104)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.40)
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Intermediate Accounting of City Bank Farmers Trust Company, as Trustee under the Will of Pierre LeBrun, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

March 11, 1959.

*Hale, Kay & Brennan*for petitioner.

*Ma<v Hoffman,*special guardian for infant contingent remaindermen.

Maximilian Moss, S.

As an incident to trustee’s intermediate account of four trusts created under articles “ Seventh, ’ ’ “ Eighth ” and “ Ninth ” of the will, the court’s instruction is sought as to the investments authorized by article “ Fourteenth ’ ’ of the will and as to significance to be given to the term “ fiscal agent ” as used therein.

Testator died a resident of Kings County, on February 14, 1924, leaving a will dated May 11, 1920, which was admitted to probate on April 11, 1924. The petitioner’s predecessor, a trust company, was appointed executor and trustee thereunder.

The portion of the will to be construed expressly states that the authority to invest shall be limited by the following: “Nor shall it invest in any shares or securities of which it may be promoter or underwriter, or of any corporation for which it shall be the fiscal agent.”

At the time the will was executed, trust companies were permitted “ To purchase, invest in and sell stocks, bills of exchange, *204bonds * * * and other securities ”. (L. 1914, ch. 369, § 185, subd. 9.) Trust companies now are not empowered to act as a promoter or underwriter of stocks, although under section 100 of the Banking Law, a trust company may act as a *“*fiscal agent.”

The difficulty arises out of the fact that a fiscal agent is generally considered one which acts as interest or dividend paying agent, sinking fund agent, escrow fund agent, transfer agent or registrar, and perhaps even as a depository. The court must determine therefore whether or not the trust company is prohibited from making investments in the stocks or bonds of any corporation for which the trust company acts as interest or dividend paying agent, sinking fund agent, transfer agent, registrar or depository.

Construing the four corners of the will, the above-mentioned prohibition concerned itself with the avoidance of self-dealing, the desire for independence of action untainted by conflicts of interest, and not the mere ministerial banking activities of a ‘ *‘*fiscal agent ’ ’. The trustee is therefore not prohibited from making permitted investments in stocks, bonds or securities of a corporation for which it performs the activities of a fiscal agent as defined herein, and the said article is so construed.

Settle decree on notice.
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00270

- CR

RUSSELL LITTLE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19F0597

- 102

Befor e Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 

### O R D E R

Our review of the reporter’s record indicates that it contain s “ sensitive data ” as that

phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP . P.

9.10(a). Sensiti ve data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who

was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.10 (a)(3). Volumes one

and sixteen through nineteen of the reporter’s record contain the name s of person s who w ere

minor s at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states , “Unless a court orders

otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court

, including the contents of any appendices,

must not contain sensitive data.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.10(b ).

Rule 9.10(g ) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in

paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9 .10(g ). Therefore, because

volumes one and sixteen through nineteen of the reporter’s record con t ain sensitive data, we

order the clerk of this Court or her appointee , in accordance with Rule 9.10(g ), to seal t he

electronically filed volumes one and sixteen through nineteen of the reporter’s record

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: Decem ber 22

, 20 20
Consent of Independent Accountants



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Form S-8 (No's. 33-37566, 33-40776, 33-61397, and 33-33026) of
Central Newspapers, Inc. of our report dated February 2, 1998 appearing on
page 23 of the Annual Report to Shareholders which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference
of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on page 17
of this Form 10-K.



/s/Price Waterhouse LLP
----------------------
Price Waterhouse LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 13, 1998
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

'v /)/) APR 172°15

. TjjrA-^ t~f „M„. JPS9BL

p v/ • J'/ /} /> AbdAcosta.Cterk </^ exft/H&o* &<f ^A< </» (fife # /U*&*«

a,

Ml...v2 5°,^/ee
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1




SYNNEX Corporation
March 1, 2018
Mr. Kevin Murai
Dear Kevin:
SYNNEX Corporation (the “Company”) is pleased to continue your employment on the following terms: 
1. Position. Effective on March 1, 2018 (the “Adjusted Employment Date”), you will be employed as Strategic Advisor, reporting to Dennis Polk. 
You will be employed at the Company’s headquarters in Fremont, California. While you render services to the Company, you agree that you will not engage in any other employment, consulting or other business activity without the prior written consent of the Company.
Your employment with the Company will be “at will,” meaning that either you or the Company may terminate your employment at any time and for any reason, with or without cause.
2. Board Membership. You will continue to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. All directors are subject to election and removal by the shareholders of the Company in accordance with its by-laws and Delaware law. 
3. Compensation. The Company will provide you with compensation that is similar to the compensation paid to our independent directors, as determined by the Board of Directors from time to time.
4. Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement. As a Company employee, you will be expected to abide by the Company’s rules and regulations. You have previously signed a Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement, which will continue in full force and effect. 
5. Other Provisions. Sections 6 (Stock Ownership Guidelines), 11 (Restrictive Covenants), 12 (Litigation), 13 (Successors), 14 (Arbitration) and 15 (Miscellaneous Provisions) contained in your offer letter dated March 27, 2008, as amended on September 26, 2016, are incorporated by reference herein and shall have the same force and effect as if set forth in full herein.
You may indicate your agreement with these terms and accept this offer by signing and dating this letter agreement.


	
			
	Very truly yours,
 
SYNNEX Corporation

	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/Dennis Polk

	 
	 
	Dennis Polk
President and Chief Executive Officer






I have read and accept this employment offer on March 1, 2018: 


	
	
	/s/Kevin Murai

	Kevin Murai
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40634 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NOE MENDOZA-BARCENAS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-95-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1999 Before WISDOM, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Noe Mendoza-Barcenas appeals from his conviction for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that the record is insufficient to establish that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights when he pleaded guilty. Mendoza-Barcenas has not identified any error on the part of the district court with regard to his guilty plea. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 967 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 967

To prohibit the President from entering into a free trade agreement or 
investment treaty with a foreign country or countries if the agreement 
    or treaty includes investor-state dispute settlement provisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2015

Mr. Pocan (for himself, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. 
 Slaughter, Mr. Nolan, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Kaptur, 
Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Ellison, and Ms. DeLauro) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 
and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the President from entering into a free trade agreement or 
investment treaty with a foreign country or countries if the agreement 
    or treaty includes investor-state dispute settlement provisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting America's Sovereignty 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AGREEMENTS THAT INCLUDE INVESTOR-STATE DISPUTE 
              SETTLEMENT PROVISIONS.

    (a) In General.--The President may not, on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, enter into any free trade agreement or 
investment treaty with a foreign country or countries if the agreement 
or treaty includes a provision described in subsection (b).
    (b) Provision Described.--A provision described in this subsection 
is a provision that grants foreign investors the right to access an 
international tribunal to seek cash damages from or injunctive relief 
against the government of the United States if such investors believe 
actions taken by the United States are in breach of rights conferred to 
foreign investors in the free trade agreement or investment treaty.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Charles W. Fischer, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nexen Inc., a
Canadian Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
      31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
      78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:   February 24, 2003                       /s/ Charles W. Fischer
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Charles W. Fischer
                                                President and Chief
                                                Executive Officer
February 16, 2007

27709

#### K.W., In re

Affirmed
21599

#### State v. Nicolaisen

Affirmed
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 19, 2019

NO. 03

- 18

- 00644

- CR

Leon Young, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUST ICES TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and t he parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Becaus e appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is

made.