alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 979 Engrossed in House (EH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 979

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate a mountain in the John Muir Wilderness of the Sierra 
                   National Forest as ``Sky Point''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Staff Sergeant Sky Mote, USMC, grew up in El Dorado, 
        California.
            (2) Staff Sergeant Mote graduated from Union Mine High 
        School.
            (3) Upon graduation, Staff Sergeant Mote promptly enlisted 
        in the Marine Corps.
            (4) Staff Sergeant Mote spent 9 years serving his country 
        in the United States Marine Corps, including a deployment to 
        Iraq and two deployments to Afghanistan.
            (5) By his decisive actions, heroic initiative, and 
        resolute dedication to duty, Staff Sergeant Mote gave his life 
        to protect fellow Marines on August 10, 2012, by gallantly 
        rushing into action during an attack by a rogue Afghan 
        policeman inside the base perimeter in Helmand province.
            (6) Staff Sergeant Mote was awarded the Navy Cross, a 
        Purple Heart, the Navy-Marine Corps Commendation Medal, a Navy-
        Marine Corps Achievement Medal, two Combat Action Ribbons, and 
        three Good Conduct Medals.
            (7) The Congress of the United States, in acknowledgment of 
        this debt that cannot be repaid, honors Staff Sergeant Mote for 
        his ultimate sacrifice and recognizes his service to his 
        country, faithfully executed to his last, full measure of 
        devotion.
            (8) A presently unnamed peak in the center of Humphrey 
        Basin holds special meaning to the friends and family of Sky 
        Mote, as their annual hunting trips set up camp beneath this 
        point; under the stars, the memories made beneath this rounded 
        peak will be cherished forever.

SEC. 2. SKY POINT.

    (a) Designation.--The mountain in the John Muir Wilderness of the 
Sierra National Forest in California, located at 3715'16.10091"N 
11843'39.54102"W, shall be known and designated as ``Sky Point''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
record, or other paper of the United States to the mountain described 
in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to ``Sky 
Point''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 1, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 979

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate a mountain in the John Muir Wilderness of the Sierra 
                   National Forest as ``Sky Point''.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARK G. OWEN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 74 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2019, the Application for Leave to File 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
ACCEPTED

12-14-00244-CV

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

4/6/2015 11:27:43 AM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/6/2015 11:27:43 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Declaration of Independence Plaque Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00264-CV

IN THE MATTER OF T.V., A JUVENILE

From the 74th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-0255-J

MEMORANDUM OPINION

T.V. filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a). Dismissal of 

this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise 

be entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. 

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed April 16, 2015

[CV06]
In the Matter of T.V., a Juvenile v. Page 2
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

31.   Declaration on Article 156 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 156 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference confirms that the policies described in Article 156 fall essentially within the competence of the Member States. Measures to provide encouragement and promote coordination to be taken at Union level in accordance with this Article shall be of a complementary nature. They shall serve to strengthen cooperation between Member States and not to harmonise national systems. The guarantees and practices existing in each Member State as regards the responsibility of the social partners will not be affected.

This Declaration is without prejudice to the provisions of the Treaties conferring competence on the Union, including in social matters.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 152 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 152

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 19, 2015.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the resolution (H. 
Res. 132) providing for the expenses of certain committees of the House of 
Representatives in the One Hundred Fourteenth Congress. The amendment printed in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be 
considered as adopted. The resolution, as amended, shall be considered as read. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution, as 
amended, to adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the 
question except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 
chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on House Administration; and 
(2) one motion to recommit which may not contain instructions.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider 
in the House the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 8) providing for congressional 
disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 
submitted by the National Labor Relations Board relating to representation case 
procedures. All points of order against consideration of the joint resolution 
are waived. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of 
order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce; and (2) one motion to 
commit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23B


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements on Form S-3 and the related Prospectuses and in the following
Registration Statements on Form S-8 of 3333 Holding Corporation and subsidiary
and Centex Development Company, L.P. and subsidiaries of our report dated May
14, 2003, with respect to the combining financial statements and schedule of
3333 Holding Corporation and subsidiary and Centex Development Company, L.P. and
subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March
31, 2003.

Form S-3 Registration No. 333-49966      Form S-8 Registration No. 33-55083
         Registration No. 333-49966-01            Registration No. 33-55083
         Registration No. 333-49966-02            Registration No. 33-55083
         Registration No. 333-54722               Registration No. 33-55083-01
         Registration No. 333-54722-01            Registration No. 33-55083-02
         Registration No. 333-54722-02            Registration No. 333-28229
         Registration No. 333-83212               Registration No. 333-28229-01
         Registration No. 333-83212-01            Registration No. 333-28229-02
         Registration No. 333-83212-02            Registration No. 333-55717
                                                  Registration No. 333-55717-01
                                                  Registration No. 333-55717-02
                                                  Registration No. 333-74185
                                                  Registration No. 333-74185-01
                                                  Registration No. 333-74185-02
                                                  Registration No. 333-86041
                                                  Registration No. 333-86041-01
                                                  Registration No. 333-86041-02
                                                  Registration No. 333-68790
                                                  Registration No. 333-68790-01
                                                  Registration No. 333-68790-02
                                                  Registration No. 333-100682
                                                  Registration No. 333-100682-01
                                                  Registration No. 333-100682-02
                                                  Registration No. 333-103440
                                                  Registration No. 333-103440-01
                                                  Registration No. 333-103440-02



Dallas, Texas
May 29, 2003
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Tony D. Whitaker, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/Tony D. WhitakerTony
      D. WhitakerChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary
      15, 2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40154

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARTURO HIDALGO-BARAJAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-1408-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arturo HidalgoBarajas (Hidalgo) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hidalgo has not filed a response. We 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40154 Document: 00513013599 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
No. 14-40154

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-40154 Document: 00513013599 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
March 24 , 2015

Mr. Dustin Breau

570 Grinding Circle

Kaysville, UT 84037

Dear Mr. Breau :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your Feb ruary 6 , 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

0314 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your reques t.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 95 21

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### Does, (DOB 6/16/75 & 8/22/82), Jane, In re

15739

5/13/94

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|/s/ ALAN VITULI                                                            
|Alan Vituli Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer June 30, 2006
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply536Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Pat Eblen (not verified)PermalinkApril 3, 2021 - 5:34amToo bad the beautiful and protective green patina was removed from the great Grant Memorial. The multi-tonal green made dramatic details of the sculpture so visible, even from across the reflecting pool. Now it’s more of a monotonal dark blob. The “restoration” was one of the greatest and most tragic artistic missteps in DC history. The incralac should be removed and the patina allowed to return... like the glorious Statue of Liberty.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 3, 2022

No. 04-22-00055-CV

Andrew Wayne BOCK,

Appellant

v.

STATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-CI-01786

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s brief originally was due on July 8, 2002. Appellee has been granted one 

extension until August 8, 2022. On August 2, 2022, appellee filed an unopposed motion 

requesting a second extension until September 7, 2022. 

The motion is GRANTED, and appellee is ORDERED to file its brief no later than

September 7, 2022. No further extensions of time will be granted in the absence of extenuating 

circumstances.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of August, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Moore Stephens Frost

A Professional Association

Certified Public Accountants

425 West Capitol, Suite 3300

Little Rock, Arkansas 72201





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







The Board of Directors

Cagles, Inc. and Subsidiary

Atlanta, Georgia





We consent to the inclusion of our report dated June 5, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cagles, Inc. and Subsidiary as of March 31, 2007 and April 1, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2007, April 1, 2006 and April 2, 2005, which report has been included in the Annual Report to Stockholders and in the Form 10-K Annual Report of Cagles, Inc. and Subsidiary.









/s/ Moore Stephens Frost, PLC



Moore Stephens Frost, PLC





Little Rock, Arkansas

June 08, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82437-82438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a

[[Page 82438]]

domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service 
Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products 
List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 24, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 17, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 16 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-58, CP2024-59.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-25894 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P