alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.7
  SECTION 1350
    CERTIFICATION OF
    ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY
    (required by Section 906 of the
    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  Form 10-K Form 10-K),
  (1)
    The
    Form 10-K
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
    or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the
    Form 10-K
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date:
    February 29, 2008
#### State v. Smith

25544

02/04/2005

Denied

106 Hawai'i 365, 105 P.3d 242
**Exhibit 21**

 

**CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.**

 

**Subsidiaries of Registrant**

 
| Carsen Group, Inc.             |   | (Incorporated   under the laws of Ontario, Canada) |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   |                                               |
| Minntech   Corporation              |   | (Incorporated   under the laws of Minnesota)       |
|                                |   |                                               |
| Minntech   B.V.                     |   | (Incorporated   under the laws of The Netherlands) |
|                                |   |                                               |
| Minntech   Japan K.K.               |   | (Incorporated   under the laws of Japan)           |
|                                |   |                                               |
| Minntech   Asia/Pacific Ltd.        |   | (Incorporated   under the laws of Singapore)       |
|                                |   |                                               |
| Biolab   Equipment Ltd.             |   | (Amalgamated   under the laws of Ontario, Canada)  |
|                                |   |                                               |
| Mar   Cor Purification, Inc.   |   | (Incorporated   under the laws of Pennsylvania)    |
|                                |   |                                               |
| Saf-T-Pak   Inc.                    |   | (Incorporated   under the laws of Canada)          |
|                                |   |                                               |
| Crosstex   International, Inc. |   | (Incorporated   under the laws of New York)        |
|                                |   |                                               |
| Strong   Dental Products, Inc. |   | (Incorporated   under the laws of Nevada)          |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>

       
<S>                                    <C>             <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS           3-MOS          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998     DEC-31-1998     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1998     MAR-31-1998     DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                 151,246,159     150,555,289     155,721,903
<SECURITIES>                                     0               0               0
<RECEIVABLES>                           29,716,528      29,604,269      23,394,199
<ALLOWANCES>                            (1,369,147)     (1,133,770)     (1,105,432)
<INVENTORY>                                      0               0               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       187,835,271     182,435,544     181,499,262
<PP&E>                                   6,986,214       5,610,089       5,327,474
<DEPRECIATION>                          (1,218,576)       (556,084)       (676,651)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         249,563,919     238,434,831     232,048,480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   19,853,419      14,400,785      15,675,768
<BONDS>                                115,000,000     115,000,000     115,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0               0               0
<PREFERRED>                                 73,000         183,000         233,000
<COMMON>                                   883,273         876,314         863,095
<OTHER-SE>                             111,964,740     106,130,360      98,065,205
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           249,563,919     238,434,831     232,048,480
<SALES>                                 63,812,349      29,645,703      73,193,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        63,812,349      29,645,703      73,198,088
<CGS>                                            0               0               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           40,735,799      19,166,777      46,900,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        11,152,284       5,199,594      17,001,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           703,133         122,617         317,588
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       3,666,710       1,838,128       3,357,716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         12,748,902       5,770,146      11,036,934
<INCOME-TAX>                             5,226,777       2,400,381       4,436,847
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      7,515,725       3,365,190       6,576,387
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0               0               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0               0               0
<CHANGES>                                        0               0               0
<NET-INCOME>                             7,515,725       3,365,190       6,576,387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.43            0.19            0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.42            0.19            0.38
        

</TABLE>
#### John LAKA, d/b/a Laka Tool & Stamping Company, and Laka Tool & Stamping Company, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COLUMBIA PEN *&*PENCIL COMPANY, Inc., and Bertram A. Strauss, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 120, Docket 28356.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 30, 1963.

Decided Nov. 13, 1963.

John M. Calimafde, New York City, N. Y., for appellants. Hopgood & Calimafde, Eugene J. Kalil, and Paul H. Blaustein, New York City, of counsel.

Holman & Holman, Mineóla, N. Y., for appellees. Bader & Bader, New York City, Assoc. Attys. I. Walton Bader, New York City, of counsel.

Before SWAN, CLARK and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from a decree dismissing their complaint in a suit charging infringement of the three claims of Patent No. 2,907,302, issued on October 6, 1959 to L. Raszl, assignor to Laka Tool and Stamping Company, Westbury, N. Y. The patent is for control mechanism of a ball point pen. Judge Mishler found that the claims were anticipated by the prior art and that Raszl’s combination would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art. We see no necessity for adding to his well-reasoned opinion. The decree is affirmed.
May 13, 2008

27494

#### Caberto v. Maui Elec. Co.

Affirmed
# C_2016203EN.01001901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/19

---

Article 32

At the request of the Commission or of a Member State, the basic standards may be revised or supplemented in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 31.

The Commission shall examine any request made by a Member State.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE DANILO ROJEL-GOMEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

Nos. 13-73231

Nos. 14-71489

Agency No. A098-006-777

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 7, 2015** 

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated petitions for review, Jose Danilo Rojel-Gomez, a

native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order

acknowledging withdrawal of Rojel-Gomez’s applications for asylum, withholding

FILED

APR 16 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture, and granting his

application for voluntary departure (No. 13-73231), and the BIA’s subsequent

order denying his motion to reopen (No. 14-71489). We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due process violations. Colmenar

v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 2000). We review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reopen. Singh v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d 1006, 1009 (9th Cir.

2005). 

The BIA did not deny Rojel-Gomez’s due process in dismissing his appeal. 

See Larita-Martinez v. INS, 220 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2000) (no due process

violation where there is no error); see also 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(C) (BIA may

summarily dismiss where “appeal is from an order that granted the party concerned

the relief that had been requested”). Thus, we deny the petition for review in No.

13-73231.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Rojel-Gomez’s motion to

reopen where Rojel-Gomez did not establish the evidence he submitted was new. 

See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1); Bolshakov v. INS, 133 F.3d 1279, 1282 (9th Cir.

2 13-73231/14-71489
1998) (upholding agency’s denial of a motion to reopen where petitioner failed to

establish evidence was “new”). Thus, we deny the petition for review in No. 14-

71489.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 13-73231/14-71489
#### Ann Adele HURN, Appellant, v. John T. HURN, Jr., Appellee.

No. 2300.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Oct. 23, 1975.

Helen L. Simpson, Anchorage, for appellant.

Juliana D. Wilson, of Wilson & Wilson, Anchorage, for appellee.

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CONNOR, ERWIN and BOOCHEVER, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

Mrs. Hurn asks us to set aside a property settlement in a divorce decree, contending that she should have been awarded one-half of the assets acquired during the marriage. The parties were married on June 18, 1971 and separated in the latter part of May 1972 when Mrs. Hurn left on an educational-business trip to South America, paid for out of the parties’ assets. No children were born as an issue of the marriage. In June or July 1972 when Mrs. Hurn returned from her trip, she decided to terminate the marriage, and the parties lived separately thereafter.

AS 09.55.210(6) specifies that in an action for divorce, the court may provide for a division of the parties’ property acquired during the marriage “in the manner as may be just, and without regard to which of the parties is in fault”. Although the facts in this case1 may well be construed to indicate an approximately equal division of property acquired during the marriage, the statute does not equate a “just” division of property with an equal division in all cases. We have repeatedly held that a judicial division of property is left by AS 09.55.210(6) to the broad discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal unless an abuse of discretion is shown. The aggrieved party must show that the property division is clearly unjust.2

*361There was adequate evidence to support the findings of the trial court,3 which are sufficient to justify limiting Mrs. Hum’s award to $5,000.00 in lieu of all rights to property acquired during the marriage. The award was not clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

BURKE, J., not participating.

1

. We shall not lengthen this opinion by detailing the facts.

2

. *Martin v. Martin,*530 P.2d 1386 (Alaska 1975) ; *Mullaly v. Mullaly,*518 P.2d 1395 (Alaska 1974) ; *Moore v. Moore,*499 P.2d 300, 304 (Alaska 1972) ; *Vanover v. Vanover,*496 P.2d 644, 645 (Alaska 1972) ; *Crume v. Crume,*378 P.2d 183, 186 (Alaska 1963) ; *McSmith v. McSmith,*387 P.2d 454, 455 (Alaska 1963).

3

. We do not construe the court’s opinion as being based on the failure of Mrs. Hurn to be gainfully employed, in the sense of securing financial remuneration. A spouse’s rights in a property settlement will not be lessened as the result of a consensual division of labor during the marriage.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,088,346
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,041,410
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,129,756
<PP&E>                                      63,012,440
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,394,561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,747,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          462,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,284,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,747,635
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,389,954
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  949,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   472,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>                            This   schedule   contains   summary
                                    financial information extracted from
                                    the   consolidated   Statements   of
                                    Operations and Balance Sheets and is
                                    qualified in its entirety by reference
                                    to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                        1
<CURRENCY>                          U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                 <C>  
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                     1
<CASH>                              789,791
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       11,487,417
<ALLOWANCES>                        173,000
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    13,533,389
<PP&E>                              33,420,837
<DEPRECIATION>                      3,374,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      75,054,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               18,876,936
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                            185,770
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                          18,530,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        75,054,805
<SALES>                             34,011,649
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    34,011,649
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       32,633,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  1,045,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     333,159
<INCOME-TAX>                        70,665
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 262,494
<DISCONTINUED>                      (11,906,554)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        (11,644,060)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (1.08)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)  I, Rene Lerer, as
Chief Executive Officer of Magellan Health Services, Inc (the Company),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:  (1)the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K
of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.  /s/ RENE LERERRene LererDate: February 26,
  2010
  Chief Executive Officer  1
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 230 (Friday, December 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 83953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26451]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Institute Initial Review Group; Career Development Study Section 
(J), February 28, 2024, 10:00 a.m. to February 29, 2024, 06:00 p.m., 
National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 
7W624, Rockville, Maryland 20850 which was published in the Federal 
Register on November 2, 2023, FR Doc. 2023-24225, 88 FR 75294.
    This notice is being amended to change the start time of the 
meeting from 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. on February 28, 2024. The meeting 
dates and location will stay the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: November 27, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-26451 Filed 11-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          32,446
<SECURITIES>                                    11,216
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,015
<PP&E>                                           6,936
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,523
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,185
<SALES>                                          8,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,220
<CGS>                                              162
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,210
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (476)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                        95
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,093
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,093
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23(b)













Consent of Independent Auditors





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 033-63210 and 333-67933) pertaining to the Stock Option Plans of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. of our report dated March 5, 2004 (except for notes 9, 11 and 12 which are as of March 24, 2004), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.











Calgary, Canada

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

March 29, 2004

Chartered Accountants
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-11T17:40:59Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-11T17:41:00Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-11T17:41:00Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="15179">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-11T17:40:59Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPIXION Q+& WAS NEVER ISSUED OK 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
26992

#### SRI Intern. v. Galijan

Affirmed