alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from
BioWhittaker's  interim  consolidated  statement  of income for the three months
ended January 31, 1997 and it's consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000                                   
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         OCT-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                              JAN-31-1997
                            
<CASH>                                            611
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                       62
<INVENTORY>                                    21,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               33,671
<PP&E>                                         34,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                 17,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 60,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           9,764
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          108
<OTHER-SE>                                     47,951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   60,856
<SALES>                                        13,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,031
<CGS>                                           6,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (85)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,015
<INCOME-TAX>                                      748
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,267
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                              
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,267 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .12
        


</TABLE>
1 The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District

of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

2 The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

3 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(b), the Chief Judge certified the existence of a judicial emergency necessitating the designation of a panel consisting of fewer than two members of the Court of Appeals.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-2423

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Southern District of Iowa. * Javier Duenas-Moreno, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 15, 2001 Filed: May 30, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, Circuit Judge, BOGUE, 1 and MAGNUSON, 2 District Judges. 3

___________ PER CURIAM.4 The Honorable Robert Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa. -2- Javier Duenas-Moreno pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States following his previous arrest and deportation as an illegal alien, 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (1994 & Supp. IV 1998), and to possessing a firearm after conviction for a felony and while being an illegal alien, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), (g)(5) (1994 & Supp. IV 1998). At sentencing, he sought a downward departure from the applicable guideline range on the ground that because of his status as a deportable alien he would suffer adverse consequences while in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons. The District Court4 denied a downward departure, concluding as a matter of law that it lacked authority to depart on this ground. Duenas-Moreno appeals, arguing that the District Court erred in denying his motion for a downward departure. He argues that the substantial penal burdens imposed on him as a result of his alienage were not contemplated under the sen tencing guidelines. We reject this argument. The circumstance Duenas-Moreno asserts to justify a downward departure, i.e. , his status as a criminally deportable alien, was in fact considered by the Sentencing Commission as a predicate defining element for the applicable guideline, U.S. S ENTENCING G UIDELINES M ANUAL § 2L1.2 (2000), andapplies to everyone in the same status as the defendant. Thus his status as a deportable alien cannot, as a matter of law, be considered a basis for departure. United States v. Cardosa-Rodriguez , 241 F.3d 613, 614 (8th Cir. 2001). Moreover, DuenasMoreno is unable to show that he is burdened by adverse penal consequences different from those imposed upon other deportable aliens sentenced under the same guideline. The sentence imposed by the District Court is affirmed.-3-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusGrounds Features
South Carolina Forestry Association Tree
        
                  The Basics
      
Materials
    Tulip

Year
    1981

Location
      
Capitol Square, N.E.

U.S. Capitol Grounds

                  View on Map

Text on the Plaque

U.S. Capitol Grounds 
Memorial Tree

*Liriodendron tulipifera*
(Tulip Tree)

Planted by 
Senator Strom Thurmond (S.C.)

For South Carolina Forestry Association

May 26, 1981 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
14 CFR Part 39

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Gill

IDocket No. FAA-2010-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-185-ADI

14910-13-Pj

ICU"RE~'CE5

rm<GS,·.,OOL

RlN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 Series Airplanes, Airbus Model .A..300

84-600 Series Airplanes, Airbus Model AJOO B4-600R Series Airplanes, and A31 0

Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products '- ~-

'"

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing air.vorthiness '--(" , V

OUIING SV'ltIOL

condition as:

information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

h(,HIl\

.·lTl~L"'S'"

I JI,

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe '~~'I~e----

I, I

ln~nNG_~'·MII(ll

~I-.\H(,\

During a maintenance check perfonned by an A31 0 operator, the

recommended modification of the lower attachment beam of rack

101VU by accomplishment of Airbus Service Bulletin (SB)

A310-53-2076 was embodied on the aeroplane, leading the

operator to find three cracks on the FR 15A crossbeam above the

NLG [nose landing gear] box at the splicing with rack 107VU

fitting.

This condition, ifnot detected and corrected, could degrade the

slructural integrity of the crossbeam on NLG FR15A web

attaclunent fitting of rack I07VU. Rack 107VU contains major

airworthiness system components whose functioning could be

adversely affected by the loss of the attachment filling.

A\ill ~

TNrnAlS-"SlG

--/'71;'1.1 m

)- /11,v

1l1ING~Yf'OOL

l"rnAI~~I(;
May 16, 2006

27113

#### A.B., In re

Affirmed
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 8, 2017

Order 

Clerk

December 8, 2017

155266(57)

KENNETH BERTIN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 155266

v COA: 328885 

Oakland CC: 2014-139901-NO

DOUGLAS MANN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On the order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the 

time for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be 

accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before December 28, 2017.
6/17/2011 Page 1 of 8 

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

 Chemical ID: P-11-0290 Reviewer: Sherer/BC 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
6/17/2011 Page 2 of 8 

 STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-11-0290 Assessor: Sherer/BC 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
6/17/2011 Page 3 of 8 

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

 Chemical ID: P-11-0290 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
6/17/2011 Page 4 of 8 

 STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-11-0290 Assessor: Sherer/BC 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
6/17/2011 Page 5 of 8 

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

 Chemical ID: P-11-0290 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
6/17/2011 Page 6 of 8 

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

 Chemical ID: P-11-0290 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
6/17/2011 Page 7 of 8 

 STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-11-0290 Assessor: Sherer/BC 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
6/17/2011 Page 8 of 8 

STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

 Chemical ID: P-11-0290 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8
October 28, 1998

20100

#### Kawakami v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Affirmed
Exhibit 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  ATEL  Cash
Distribution Fund IV, LP;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material  information  relating to the registrant is made known
     to us by others within the entity,  particularly during the period in which
     this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
     procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
     effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal  quarter that has  materially  affected or is  reasonably  likely to
     materially   affect  the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
     reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.



Date:
May 11, 2004

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
--------------------------
Paritosh K. Choksi
Principal Financial Officer of Registrant, Executive
Vice President of General Partner
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 6/26/96 TENTH CIRCUIT
PHILLIP CORDOVA, Plaintiff - Appellant, vs. LAWRENCE BARRERAS, Defendant - Appellee. No. 95-2180 (D.C. No. CIV-95-819-JP) (D.N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. ** Mr. Cordova, an inmate appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the dismissal of his Motion for Injunction and/or Mandamus seeking transfer to another correctional facility. He contends that his transfer to an out-of-state facility was a result of racial discrimination. The district court treated the motion as a complaint and dismissed it pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) because it was obvious that the claim was- 2 -

barred by res judicata and therefore without merit. See Yellen v. Cooper , 828 F.2d 1471 (10th Cir. 1987). We review the district court’s dismissal for an abuse of discretion. Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). Mr. Cordova attacked his transfer in a separate prior action on different grounds. Res judicata precludes the litigation of issues that were or could have been raised in the prior action. Klein v. Zavaras , 80 F.3d 432, 434 (10th Cir. 1996). The district court acted well within its discretion. AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Burial of DeSoto
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Constantino Brumidi

Location
      
Capitol Rotunda

Spanish explorer Hernando DeSoto died of a fever while searching for gold in Florida and the territory north of the Gulf of Mexico. To protect his body from enemies, his men buried him at night in the Mississippi River, which he had been the first European to discover. (1542)

About the Frieze of American History

The frieze in the Rotunda of the United States Capitol contains a painted panorama depicting significant events in American history. Thomas U. Walter's 1859 cross-section drawing of the new dome (constructed 1855-1863) shows a recessed belt atop the Rotunda walls with relief sculpture.

Eventually it was painted in true fresco, a difficult and exacting technique in which the pigments are applied directly onto wet plaster. As the plaster cures the colors become part of the wall. Consequently, each section of plaster must be painted the day it is laid. The frieze is painted in grisaille, a monochrome of whites and browns that resembles sculpture. It measures 8 feet 4 inches in height and approximately 300 feet in circumference. It starts 58 feet above the floor. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### State v. Price

23360

08/08/2001

Affirmed
****

**AUDIT PLAN**

**Remote Audits – Attachment I**(July 2020)	Page 1 of 1 	                           USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Attachment 2 – Remote Audits Draft	Page 1	

# image1.jpeg
27290

#### State v. Yalon

Affirmed
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 954 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

from the individual mandate certain individuals who had 

coverage under a terminated qualified health plan funded 

through the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO– 

OP) program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 954 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CO–OP Consumer 

3 Protection Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM INDIVIDUAL MANDATE FOR CER5 TAIN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD COVERAGE 

6 UNDER A TERMINATED HEALTH PLAN FUND7 ED THROUGH THE CONSUMER OPERATED 

8 AND ORIENTED PLAN (CO–OP) PROGRAM. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5000A(e) of the Internal 

10 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

11 the following new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(6) CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS PREVIOUSLY EN13 ROLLED IN HEALTH PLANS FUNDED THROUGH THE

14 CONSUMER OPERATED AND ORIENTED PLAN (CO–OP)

15 PROGRAM.—Any applicable individual for any month 

16 if— 

17 ‘‘(A) such individual was enrolled in min18 imum essential coverage offered by a qualified 

19 nonprofit health insurance issuer (as defined in 

20 subsection (c) of section 1322 of the Patient 

21 Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 

22 18042)) receiving funds with respect to such 

23 coverage through the Consumer Operated and 

24 Oriented Plan program established under such 

25 section, 
3 

•HR 954 EH

1 ‘‘(B) during the calendar year which in2 cludes such month, such issuer terminated such 

3 coverage in the area in which the individual re4 sides, and 

5 ‘‘(C) such month ends after the date on 

6 which such coverage was so terminated.’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to months begin9 ning after December 31, 2013. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 954 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

program. sumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO–OP) qualified health plan funded through the Conviduals who had coverage under a terminated exempt from the individual mandate certain indi-
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Edward I, Relief Portrait
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Laura Gardin Fraser

Year
    1950

Location
      
House Chamber

Edward I (1239-1307) King of England. Founded the parliamentary constitution of England. Eliminated the divisive political effects of the feudal system.

The 23 marble relief portraits over the gallery doors of the House Chamber in the U.S. Capitol depict historical figures noted for their work in establishing the principles that underlie American law. They were installed when the chamber was remodeled in 1949-1950. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
### -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

34 36 38 40 42 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/27 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●