T he ca s e i s unani m ous l yor der ed s ubm i t t ed w i t houtor al ar gum ent * pur s uantt o Fed. R . A pp. P. 34( a) ( 2) and 10t h C i r . R . 34. 1( G ) . T hi s or derand j udgm enti s notbi ndi ng pr ece dent , exce ptundert he doctr i nes of l aw of t he ca s e, r es j udi cat a, and col l at er al es t oppel . T he cour tgener al l ydi s favor s t he ci t at i on of or der s and j udgm ent s ; never t hel es s , an or derand j udgm entm aybe ci t ed undert he t er m s and condi t i ons of 10t h C i r . R . 36. 3. 

## F I LED United States C ourt of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### Ju ly19,2006 Elisab eth A. Shumaker C l erk of C ourt UNI TED S TATES CO URT O F AP PEALS

T E N T H C IR C U IT UNI T E D S T AT E S OF AM E RI CA , Pl ai nt i ff – A ppel l ee, v. DENI S E S OUSE R, D e fe n d a n t – A p p e llan t. N o. 05- 1500 ( D. C. No . 0 3 - CR - 0 0 4 1 1 - M S K)

(D . C o lo .)

OR DER AND J UDGM EN T * B efor e KELLY , M c KAY , and LU CE RO , C i rcui tJudg es. A f ter D e n ise S o u se r p led g u iltyto o n e c o u n t o f m a k in g a fa lse sta tem e n t to t he G over nm enti n vi ol at i on of 18 U . S. C . § 1001, s he w as or der ed t o pay r es t i tut i on and s ent ence d t o fi ve y ear s ’ pr obat i on. T he di s t r i ctcour ti m pos ed a condi t i on t o herpr obat i on r equi r i ng Souse rt o not i fyherempl oy erabouther convi ct i on. C oncerned t hatherempl oy m entw oul d be t er m i nat ed, Souse r a p p e a l e d t h e e m p l o y e r - n o t i c e r e q u i r e m e n to f h e rp r o b a t i o n t o t h i s c o u r t . We vaca t ed and r emanded t he condi t i on beca us e t he s ent enci ng cour tfai l ed t o m akeU .S .S .G . § 5 F 1 .5 , en tit led “ O c c u p a tio n a l R e stric tio n s,” p ro v id e s in 1 re lev a n t p a rt: (a) T he co urtm ayi m po se a con dit i on of p robat i on or supervi sed rel ease pr ohi bi t i ng t he defendantfr om engagi ng i n a s peci fi ed occ upat i on, bus i nes s , orpr ofes s i on, orl i m i t i ng t he t er m s on w hi ch t he defendantm ay d o so , o n lyif

it d e ter m in e s th a t: (1) a rea so n ab lyd ir ec t r elati o n sh ip ex ist ed b etw ee n the d efen d an t’ s occupa t i on, bus i nes s , orpr ofes s i on and t he conduc tr el evantt o t he offe ns e of c onvi ct i on; and ( 2) i m pos i t i on of s uch a r es t r i ct i on i s r eas onabl ynece s s ar yt o pr ot ect t he publ i c bec aus e t her e i s r eas on t o bel i eve that , abs ents uch r es t r i ct i on, t he defendantw i l l cont i nue t o engage i n unl aw ful conduct s i m i l art o t hatforw hi ch t he defendantw as convi ct ed. - 2 - cer t ai n fac tual fi ndi ngs nece s s ar yt o i m pos e an “ O ccupa t i on R es t r i ct i on” under U .S .S .G . § 5 F 1 .5 . S e e U n ite d S ta te s v . S o u s e r, 4 0 5 F .3 d 1 1 6 2 (1 0 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ). 1 O n r emand, t he di s t r i ctcourthel d a s ent enci ng hear i ng and ul t i m at el ygr ant ed t he Pr obat i on O ffi ce’ s r eques tt o r es t or e t he di s put ed condi t i on. Souse rnow appea l s t he di s t r i ctcour t ’ s deci s i on t o r ei m pos e t he di s put ed condi t i on. U nderU . S. S. G . § 5F1. 5( a) ( 2) , t he di s t r i ctcour tm ayi m pos e an empl oy er - not i fi cat i on condi t i on on empl oy m enti f, abs entnot i fi cat i on, t he defe ndantw i l l cont i nue t o engage i n unl aw ful conducts i m i l art o t hatforw hi ch s he w as convi ct ed. T hi s r equi r ement w as s at i s fi ed, t he di s t r i ctcour tfound, beca us e Sous er ’ s r efus al t o t el l herempl oy eraboutherpr es entconvi ct i on cons t i tut ed conc eal m entof a facts i m i l art o t he conduc tw hi ch l ead t o her convi ct i on i n t hi s cas e. O n appea l , t he U ni t ed St at es conce des t hatt hi s fi ndi ng does nots at i s fy§ 5F1. 5( a) ( 2) . Speci fi cal l y , t he G over nm entagr ees w i t h Souse r- 3 -

t hatt he di s t r i ctcour tpl ace d Souse ri n a C at ch- 22, effect i vel yt el l i ng hert hat

“ y o u r fa ilu re to re v e a l y o u r c o n v ictio n sh o w s m e th a t I n e e d to o rd e r y o u to tell y o u r e m p lo y e r.” T h e G o v e rn m e n t th e re fo re m a in tain s th a t th e c o n d iti o n sh o u ld be vac at ed and the ca s e be r emanded forde novo r es ent enci ng. W e agr ee. S ou ser ’s sent ence is VAC ATED and t he case is REM AND ED for r es ent enci ng. ENT ERE D FOR T HE COURT

C arlos F . L u ce ro C i r cui tJ udge