alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18
             UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AMTROL Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Joseph L.
DePaula, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Title 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2006                       By: /s/JOSEPH L. DEPAULA
                                               --------------------------------
                                                Joseph L. DePaula,
                                                Executive Vice President, Chief
                                                Financial Officer, Treasurer and
                                                Secretary
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

John Martinez, * From the 106th District

 Court of Dawson County,

 Trial Court No. 13-7243.

Vs. No. 11-13-00091-CR * April 16, 2015

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 903 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 903

   To require notification of individuals of breaches of personally 
identifiable information through Exchanges under the Patient Protection 
            and Affordable Care Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2015

  Mr. Pitts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require notification of individuals of breaches of personally 
identifiable information through Exchanges under the Patient Protection 
            and Affordable Care Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Exchange Security and 
Transparency Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS OF BREACHES OF PERSONALLY 
              IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION THROUGH PPACA EXCHANGES.

    Not later than two business days after the discovery of a breach of 
security of any system maintained by an Exchange established under 
section 1311 or 1321 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
(42 U.S.C. 18031, 18041) which is known to have resulted in personally 
identifiable information of an individual being stolen or unlawfully 
accessed, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall provide 
notice of such breach to each such individual.
                                 <all>
```
February 6, 2004

25055

#### State v. Johnson

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           372,984
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           12,949
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             12,895
<EQUITIES>                                      67,500
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 453,433
<CASH>                                          39,279
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 807,345
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             52,759
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 226,577
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 55,488
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,410
<OTHER-SE>                                     291,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   807,345
<PREMIUMS>                                     388,608
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              9,845
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  15,843
<BENEFITS>                                     310,170
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            92,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,030
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,660
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,370
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,370
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Robert Davis et al., Respondents, *v.*Robert Williams, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Anthony Tedesco, Respondent, *v.*Robert Williams, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.) Robert E. Wilson, Respondent, *v.*Robert Williams, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 3.) Anthony Tedesco, Respondent, *v.*Robert Williams, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 4.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

April 9, 1959.

*Held, Telchin d Held (Edward F. Doran, Jr.,*of counsel), for appellant.

*Wilfrid E. Marrin*for respondents in Actions No. 3 and No. 4.

No one appearing for respondents in Actions No. 1 and No. 2.

*Per Curiam.*

The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to appellant, and motion to consolidate granted, without costs. Respondents failed to show that consolidation would prejudice a substantial right. *(Shea*v. *Benjamin, 275*App. Div. 1003; *889
      *Kelly*v. *John Vogel, Inc.,*279 App. Div. 797; *Tammany*v. *Bloom,*5 AD 2d 996.) The possibility that the action originally brought in the City Court might be settled and the Municipal Court actions severed and returned to the Municipal Court is no present valid basis for denying consolidation.

Concur — Pette, Di Gtovanna and Benjamin, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant toRule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)Of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of DynTek, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the ChiefFinancial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section1350,that based on my knowledge:

 

(1)           the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), fullycomplies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: : November 19, 2007 | /s/ David W. Berry      |   |
|----------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                       | David W. Berry          |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00300-CR

Kristin Nichole Bowling

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 14-AC-0466

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed as moot. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED AS MOOT in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 17, 2015
July 12, 2001

23670

#### State v. Connelly

Affirmed
23580

#### State v. Huynh

Affirmed
SCWC-14-0000392 

________________________________________________________________ 

________________________________________________________________ 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS 

 Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Carolyn Mizukami’s 

application for writ of certiorari filed on April 22, 2015, is 

hereby rejected. 

 

 

Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-14-0000392 

18-MAY-2015 

09:43 AM 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII 

CAROLYN MIZUKAMI, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
 

vs.
 

DON QUIJOTE (USA) COMPANY, LTD., and 

DTRIC INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees. 

(CAAP-14-0000392; CIV. NO. 12-1-3273) 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, May 18, 2015. 

Carolyn Mizukami 

petitioner pro se 

 

Richard B. Miller and 

Patricia Kehau Wall 

for respondent DTRIC 

Insurance Company, Ltd. 

 

 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  January 23, 2007
/s/ John P. Manning   
John P. Manning 
Principal Executive Officer
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S

O F T E X A S

NO. WR-91, 542-01

EX P ART E CHRIST OP HER STEV EN SON, Appl icant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A WRIT OF HAB EA S CORP US

CAUSE NO. 17-04- 16008A IN THE 506 DI STRI CT COURT T H

F ROM WAL LE R COUNTY

P er cur iam

. Y E A R Y

, J.

, concur r ed.

O P I N I O N

A ppl i can t was co n v i ct ed o f b urgl ary o f a b ui l di n g an d s en

t en ced t o t wo y ears ’ i

m pri s o n m en t

.

A ppl i can t f i l ed t h i s appl i cat i o n f

o r a wri t o f h ab eas co rpus i n t h e co un

t y o f co n v i ct i o n

, an d t h e di s t ri ct

cl erk f o rwarded i

t t o t h i s Co urt

. See T E X

. C O D E C R I M

. P R O C

. art

. 11. 07.

A ppl i can t co n t en ds

, am o n g o t h er t h i

n gs

, t h at h e i s act ual l

y i n n o cen t

. Ba s ed o n t h e r eco rd,

t h e t ri al co urt h as det erm i n ed t h at A

ppl i can t h as es t ab l i s h ed b y cl ear an d co n v i n ci n g ev i den ce t h at

h e i s act ual l

y i n n o cen t

.

W e agr ee. Re l i ef i s gran

t ed. E x parte E lizondo

, 947 S. W

. 2d 202 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 1996);

E x par te Tuley

, 109 S. W

. 3d 388 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 2002). T h e j udgm

en t i n caus e nu m

b er 17-04-

16008 i n t h e 506 Di s t ri ct Co urt o f W al l er Co un t y i s s et as i de, an d A

ppl i can t i s rem an ded t o t h e th2

cus t o dy o f t h e Sh eri f

f o f W al l er Co un

t y t o an s wer t h e ch arges as s et o ut i n t h e i n di ct m en t

. T h e t ri al

co urt s h al l i s s ue an

y n ece s s ary b en ch warran t wi t h i n t en day s f

ro m t h e dat e o f t h i s Co urt ’ s m an dat e.

Co pi es o f t h i s o pi

n i o n s h al l b e s en

t t o t h e T ex as Depa

rt m en t o f Cri m i n al J us t i ce–C o rr ect i o n al

In s t i t ut i o n s Di v i s i o n an d t h e Bo ard o f Pardo n s an d Paro l es

.

Del i v ered: F eb ruar y 10, 2021

Do n o t pub l i s h
107 P.3d 1189

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

September 1, 2004

25178

#### Naeole v. D'Enbeau; D'Enbeau v. O’Brien

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of T-3 Energy Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gus D. Halas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ GUS D. HALAS       
|Gus D. Halas           
|Chief Executive Officer
|July 24, 2006          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to T-3 Energy Services,
Inc. and will be retained by T-3 Energy Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Raj Das, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of *info*USA Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: May 10, 2004     */s/ Raj Das*   Raj Das Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-92906) pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated Stock
Option Plan of our report dated March 18, 1997, except for Note 20, as to which
the date is August 21, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedules of Standard Management Corporation, as amended, included in this Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1996.
 
                                          Ernst & Young LLP
 
Indianapolis, Indiana
August 29, 1997
EXHIBIT 99.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Director, Principal and Principal Executive Officer of C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.



|                  | Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III L.P.
|----------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|Date:             |                                        
|February 19, 2003 | By:                                    
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |                                        
|                  |