alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply535Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Jack Turner (n... (not verified)PermalinkJuly 15, 2016 - 12:21pmA long time staffer once told me that the little closets were used to store spittoons in the old tobacco-chewing days. This was a story passed on to him.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
EXHIBIT  99.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFG Investment Trust C (the "Trust"),
on  Form  10-Q  for  the  period  ended  September  30,  2002  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  the  Principal  Financial  and  Accounting  Officer of the Trust's
Managing  Trustee,  hereby  certifies  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350 as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:
(1)     the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and
(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of the Trust.

                    /s/  Richard  K  Brock
                    ----------------------
                    Richard  K  Brock
Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Treasurer  of  AFG  ASIT  Corp.,
the  Managing  Trustee  of  the  Trust
(Principal  Financial  and  Accounting  Officer)
                                                 November  19,  2002
July 27, 1998

20793

#### Kane v. Ho

Affirmed
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Acting Chief
Financial Officer of infoUSA Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|      |  |                   |  |                                                           
|----- |  | ----------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | November 14, 2002 |  | /s/ Stormy L. Dean
Stormy L. Dean,
Chief Financial Officer

32
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Kenneth A. Myszkowski, Chief Financial Officer of Arrowhead Research Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule
13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                             
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2010 |  |  |  |                             
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | /s/    KENNETH A. MYSZKOWSKI
|                      |  |  |  | Kenneth A. Myszkowski       
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer     

A signed original of these written statements required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Arrowhead Research Corporation
and will be retained by Arrowhead Research Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
        32.1
  CERTIFICATION
 Pursuant
        to Rule 13a-14(a) and
        Rule 15d-14(a)
 Under
        the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934
 18
        U.S.C. Section
        1350
 As
        Adopted Pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   In
        connection
        with the Quarterly Report of Franklin Lake Resources Inc. ("Company") on
        Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Father Gregory Ofiesh, acting
        in my capacity
        as the Chief Executive Officer and as the Acting Chief Financial Officer
        of the Company,
        certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   1The
        Report fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2    
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,
 the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.
   Date
        May 19, 2006
  /s/ Father Gregory Ofiesh .
 Father
        Gregory Ofiesh
 President
        and Chief Executive Officer
  /s/ Father Gregory Ofiesh .
 Father
          Gregory Ofiesh
 Acting Chief Financial
          Officer
  _______________
 10-QSB
        043006 F
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CDI Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respect,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



By:

/s/    ROGER H. BALLOURoger H. Ballou President and Chief Executive Officer




Dated:
March 15, 2006



By:

/s/    MARK A. KERSCHNERMark A. Kerschner Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




Dated:
March 15, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to CDI Corp. and will be retained by CDI Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



54
May 17, 2006

27071

#### Mattos v. Aloha Hyundai, Ltd.

Affirmed
#### State v. Medeiros

17307

1/29/96

Denied

80 Hawai'i 251, 909 P.2d 579
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      23,016,669
<SECURITIES>                                   156,616
<RECEIVABLES>                                  506,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,629,513
<PP&E>                                      72,423,931
<DEPRECIATION>                            (32,239,136)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,761,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,258,312
<BONDS>                                     26,806,912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,695,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                70,761,041
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,241,043
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,945,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,962,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,333,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,333,185
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,333,185
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### State v. Iosefa.

16217

7/21/94

Granted

880 P.2d 1224
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus II Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Harry O. Nicodemus IV, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                          
|------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Dated: May 12, 2006 |  | /s/ HARRY O. NICODEMUS IV
|                    |  | Harry O. Nicodemus IV    
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50087 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
HECTOR BALDERRAMA

- CASTRO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:18

- CR

- 2466

- 1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Hector Balderrama

- Castro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Balderrama

- Castro h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 6, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50087 Document: 00515108728 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2019No. 19

- 50087

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from fu rther responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-50087 Document: 00515108728 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/06/2019
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00032-CV

In the Interest of M.K.T. and B.S.T., Minor Children

On Appeal from the

52nd District Court of Coryell County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CD-10-39625

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and remanded. 

The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for 

further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 24, 2015
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Christopher Anzalone, Chief Executive Officer of Arrowhead Research
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 11, 2008



/S/    CHRISTOPHER
ANZALONEChristopher AnzaloneChief Executive Officer


A signed original of these written statements required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to Arrowhead Research Corporation and will be retained by Arrowhead Research Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply633Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Rob Horrell (not verified)PermalinkApril 8, 2024 - 8:59amAs an ARCHTIECT I would point out the difference in old and new Cooper. Old COOPER was not as pure as what we get now and ages much slower as the impurities contribute to the aging. They also are contribuite to the pitting.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
San Luis Obispo County APCD 206-1 11/5/91

RULE 206. CONDITIONAL APPROVAL 

 (Adopted 8/2/76; Revised 11/13/84 and 11/5/91) 

The Air Pollution Control Officer may issue an Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate, 

subject to conditions which will insure the compliance of any machine, article, equipment, or 

other contrivance within the standards of Rule 204, including, but not limited to, emission limits 

on an annual basis or any other appropriate period of time, in which case the conditions shall be 

specified in writing. Commencing operation under such a Permit to Operate shall be deemed 

acceptance of all conditions so specified. The Air Pollution Control Officer shall issue a Permit 

to Operate with revised conditions upon receipt of a new application, if the applicant 

demonstrates that the article, machine, equipment or other contrivances can operate within the 

standards of Rule 204 under the revised conditions. Construction or operation of any emission 

unit in violation of the conditions of the Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate is prohibited 

and shall constitute a violation of these District Rules and Regulations.
#### GECC Financial Corp. v. Kelly

16748

9/25/95

Vacated and Remanded
#### Reiche v. Ferrera

24449

01/16/2003

Affirmed
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

 Decided: April 20, 2015 

S15A0507. BADEN v. OCHOA-HERNANDEZ.

THOMPSON, Chief Justice.

The trial court granted relief in this habeas corpus case pursuant to an

order which reads, in its entirety: “After hearing evidence in the above-styled

case, it is hereby ordered that the guilty plea in this case, which was in the

Superior Court of Gwinnett County, bewithdrawn and the conviction associated

therewith be vacated and set aside. [Appellee] shall be remanded to Gwinnett

County for further proceedings in accordance with this order.” The warden

appeals.

Because the order granting habeas relief does not contain written findings

of facts and conclusions of law upon which the judgment is based, it fails to

meet the requirements of OCGA § 9-14-49. Accordingly, the judgment of the

habeas court is vacated and the case remanded for issuance of an order in

compliance with OCGA § 9-14-49. See Thomas v. State, 284 Ga. 327, 328 (2)
(667 SE2d 375) (2008), overruled on other grounds, Crosson v. Conway, 291

Ga. 220, 222 (728 SE2d 617) (2012).

Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction. All the Justices

concur. 

2
28849

#### State v. Miller

Affirmed
Opinion filed October 19 , 202 3



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ No. 11

- 2 3

- 00192

- CV

__________ IN THE INTEREST OF C.M.S., S.M.S., M.L.S., AND O.A.S. , CH ILD REN

On Appeal from the 29 t h District Court Palo Pinto County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C50136

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N On July 19, 2023, the trial court sign ed an order in a suit to modify the parent

child relationship that, among other things, (1) required the parents of the children, C.M.S., S.M.S., M.L.S., and O.A.S. , to continue to serve as joint managing

conservators and comply with a modified possession order , (2) designat ed the
mother to have the exclusive right to designate the children’s primary residence, and (3) granted a judgment in favor of the mother for child support arrearage s owed by
the father

. The father , Appellant, subsequently filed a pro se notice of appeal. When the appeal was docketed in this court, the clerk of this court notified the parties that2 it appeared that the notice of appeal was not timely filed . W e directed Appellant to
file a motion for extension of time to file the no tice of appeal within fifteen days and

to provid e a reasonable explanation for his failure to file a timely notice

. The documents on file in this appeal show that the trial court signed its order
in the underlying suit on July 19, 2023 . The notice of appeal was therefore due to
be filed no later than A ugust 18, 2023

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1

. Appellant did not
file h is notice of appeal until August 21, 2023

— after the deadline to file had expired

. Upon receipt of his untimely notice of appeal , we directed Appellant to file a motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal by September 5, 2023. As of this date, Appellant has not responded, nor has he filed a motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal.
W e are prohibited from suspending the Rules of Appellate Procedure “to alter the time for perfecting an appeal in a civil case.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2. Absent a timely notice of appeal, this court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See
Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys. , 160 S.W.3d 559, 564 (Tex. 2005); Garza v.
Hibernia Nat’l Bank , 227 S.W.3d 233, 233

– 34 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.); see also Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Because we are without jurisdiction, we must dismiss the a ppeal. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 42.3(a). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

W. STACY TROTTER
JUSTICE
October 19 , 2023
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J. , and Will iams , J.