alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           9
<LEGEND>
The Consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations of the
company's form 10-Q for the year to date
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                 11,839
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                        3,397
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            90,298
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        0
<LOANS>                               193,100
<ALLOWANCE>                             2,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        327,148
<DEPOSITS>                            282,453
<SHORT-TERM>                           10,279
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     2,407
<LONG-TERM>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                               24,575
<OTHER-SE>                              4,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        327,148
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         4,447
<INTEREST-INVEST>                       1,312
<INTEREST-OTHER>                          166
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        5,925
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      2,288
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      2,453
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   3,472
<LOAN-LOSSES>                             146
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         3,979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           371
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              260
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                           4.72
<LOANS-NON>                               817
<LOANS-PAST>                                0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                            0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                        2,645
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              12
<RECOVERIES>                               88
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                       2,780
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                     0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6058

CURTIS L. KING,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(0:14-cv-01677-RBH)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis L. King, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis L. King appeals the district court’s order adopting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing 

without prejudice his petition for a writ of mandamus. On 

appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the 

Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because King does 

not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition in 

his informal brief, he has forfeited appellate review of the 

court’s order. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE II

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

Article 19

1.   By way of derogation from Article 2 of the Protocol on transitional provisions, annexed to the TEU, the TFEU and the EAEC Treaty, and by way of derogation from the maximum number of seats provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 14(2) of the TEU, the number of members of the European Parliament shall be increased by 12 members from Croatia, to take account of the accession of Croatia, for the period running from the date of accession until the end of the 2009-2014 term of the European Parliament.

2.   By way of derogation from Article 14(3) of the TEU, Croatia shall, before the date of accession, hold ad hoc elections to the European Parliament, by direct universal suffrage of its people, for the number of members fixed in paragraph 1 of this Article, in accordance with the Union acquis. However, if the date of accession is less than six months before the next elections to the European Parliament, the members of the European Parliament representing the citizens of Croatia may be designated by the national Parliament of Croatia, from its midst, provided that the persons in question have been elected by direct universal suffrage.

acquis

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                             1,179,000
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      2,448,000
<ALLOWANCES>                         305,000
<INVENTORY>                          109,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 152,971,000
<PP&E>                               985,000
<DEPRECIATION>                       744,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   161,354,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            129,526,000
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              78,000
<OTHER-SE>                        31,750,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     161,354,000
<SALES>                           59,770,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  59,770,000
<CGS>                             55,847,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     55,847,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    3,923,000
<INCOME-TAX>                       1,648,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                       2,275,000
<EPS-BASIC>                            .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .31



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 6, 2011

y0829 

# Order

September 6, 2011

142567

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142567 COA: 299164 Oakland CC: 2006-206697-FH NEIL PATRICK BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 2, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### WILLIAM F. BENNETT *v.*JOHN H. LINDSAY

(AC 19364)

Hennessy, Pellegrino and Dupont, Js.

Argued May 30

officially released June 27, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
Products ISO Standards By TC TC 31 Tyres, rims and valves 

ISO 28580:2009 

Passenger car, truck and bus tyres -- Methods of measuring rolling resistance -- Single point test and 

correlation of measurement results 

Media and price 

General information 

Number of Pages: 26

Abstract 

ISO 28580:2009 specifies methods for measuring rolling resistance, under controlled laboratory conditions, for new 

pneumatic tyres designed primarily for use on passenger cars, trucks and buses. Tyres intended for temporary use 

only are not included in ISO 28580:2009. 

ISO 28580:2009 includes a method for correlating measurement results to allow inter-laboratory comparisons. 

Measurement of tyres using this method enables comparisons to be made between the rolling resistance of new 

test tyres when they are free-rolling straight ahead, in a position perpendicular to the drum outer surface, and in 

steady-state conditions. 

In measuring tyre rolling resistance, it is necessary to measure small forces in the presence of much larger forces. 

It is, therefore, essential that equipment and instrumentation of appropriate accuracy be used. 

Language Format Add to basket

English PDF (271 kB) CHF 112,00

English Paper CHF 112,00

French PDF (282 kB) CHF 112,00

French Paper CHF 112,00

Edition: 1 (Monolingual) ICS: 83.160.01

Status: Published Stage: 60.60 (2009-06-24)

TC/SC: TC 31

ISO 28580:2009 - Passenger car, truck and bus tyres -- Methods of measuring rolling resi... Page 1 of 2

http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=44770 9/20/2010
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply632Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Katrina (not v... (not verified)PermalinkMarch 10, 2020 - 2:25pmThat is remarkable, especially the precision to which it cuts. Nice article.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# EUR-Lex - 22003A1118(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22003A1118(01)

**Agreement renewing the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and the Government of the Russian Federation **

*
Official Journal L 299 , 18/11/2003 P. 0021 - 0022 *

Agreement

renewing the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and the Government of the Russian Federation

THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY (hereinafter "the Community"), of the one part,

and

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, of the other part,

hereinafter referred to as the "Parties",

CONSIDERING the importance of science and technology for their economic and social development;

RECOGNISING that the Community and the Russian Federation are pursuing research and technological activities in a number of areas of common interest, and that participation in each other's research and development activities on a basis of reciprocity will provide mutual benefits;

HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and the Government of the Russian Federation, which was signed in Brussels on 16 November 2000 and expired on 31 December 2002;

DESIRING to pursue their cooperation in science and technology in the formal framework established by the Agreement,

HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and the Government of the Russian Federation, which was signed in Brussels on 16 November 2000 and expired on 31 December 2002, is hereby renewed for an additional period of five years.

Article 2

This Agreement shall enter into force on the date on which the Parties have notified each other in writing that their respective internal procedures necessary for its entry into force have been completed.

Article 3

This Agreement is drawn up in duplicate in the Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish and Russian languages, each of these texts being equally authentic.

Por la Comunidad Europea/For Det Europæiske Fællesskab/Für die Europäische Gemeinschaft/Για την Ευρωπαϊκή Κοινότητα/For the European Community/Pour la Communauté européenne/Per la Comunità europea/Voor de Europese Gemeenschap/Pela Comunidade Europeia/Euroopan yhteisön puolesta/På Europeiska gemenskapens vägnar

>PIC FILE= "L_2003299EN.002201.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2003299EN.002202.TIF">

Por el Gobierno de la Federación de Rusia/For regeringen for Den Russiske Føderation/Für die Regierung der Russischen Föderation/Για την κυβέρνηση της Ρωσικής Ομοσπονδίας/For the Government of the Russian Federation/Pour le gouvernement de la Fédération de Russie/Per il governo della Federazione russa/Voor de regering van de Russische Federatie/Pelo Governo da Federação Russa/Venäjän federaation hallituksen puolesta/För Ryska federationens regering

>PIC FILE= "L_2003299EN.002203.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2003299EN.002204.TIF">
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeAbout UsOrganizational StructureOffice of the Chief of Operations
Capitol Power Plant
        
                  The Capitol Power Plant jurisdiction manages the facilities that provide and distribute steam and chilled water to heat and cool the U.S. Capitol and 22 other facilities on and around the Capitol campus.

The jurisdiction also maintains the campus electrical distribution system, campus street lighting, the congressional cable television system and the legislative call system. The power plant operates on a reimbursable basis for noncongressional facilities and procures electricity from commercial suppliers.
          
    
      Recent Stories
Related Articles
            
          Behind the Scenes

  24 Hours at the Capitol Power Plant

The mission of the Architect of the Capitol (AOC) continues year-round, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Our buildings never sleep, and the work never stops. This is especially true for the dedicated workers at the Capitol Power Plant.
    Behind the Scenes

  Capitol Power Plant Employees Power Through the Pandemic

Showing Incredible Dedication in Uncertain Circumstances
    History & Discoveries

  Capitol Power Plant: A Century of Service

The Capitol Power Plant has undergone significant changes as new buildings were built, and more modern and efficient equipment was installed, but what hasn't changed is the commitment of the staff. The plant's staff are highly-skilled and extremely dedicated — many have worked there for decades.
Image
    A talented employee of an Architect of the Capitol sheet metal shop.

Expertise

Skillful Craftmanship

We serve in diverse roles applying both modern techniques and historical tradecrafts in the care and preservation of the Capitol campus.

Areas of Expertise Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jason Roy Lebaron, * From the 42nd District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 28759A.

Vs. No. 11-21-00036-CR * April 23, 2021

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply501Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Robert (not ve... (not verified)PermalinkMarch 7, 2016 - 3:49pmThis is awesome! Can you write an article on the chitty chitty bang bang subway on the House side?
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40915 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus STAFFORD DEWAYNE PATTERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC Nos. 3:00-CV-56 3:97-CR-4-13

-------------------- January 22, 2003 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Stafford Dewayne Patterson, federal prisoner #06408-078, has filed a motion and brief to expand the district court’s grant of a certificate of appealability (COA) to include the claims that the district court constructively amended his indictment by instructing the jury that it was to determine the amount of drugs involved in his offense, which he contends violates Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and that counsel was ineffectiveNo. 02-40915 -2- for depriving him of his right to testify. He also challenges the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claim that his indictment, conviction, and sentence were in violation of Apprendi . The district court granted COA on the issue whether Apprendi applies retroactively to cases on collateral review. We herein address all of Patterson’s claims as opposed to first determining whether to expand the grant of COA and then subsequently addressing Patterson’s appeal on the issue for which COA was granted by the district court. See United States v. Kimler , 150 F.3d 429 (5th Cir. 1998) ; United States v. Kimler , 167 F.3d 889 (5th Cir. 1999). To obtain a COA, Patterson must make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Patterson’s conclusory assertion that his testimony would have resulted in an acquittal had he been allowed to testify is insufficient to demonstrate ineffective assistance. See Sayre v. Anderson , 238 F.3d 631, 634 (5th Cir. 2001). Because Apprendi is not retroactively applicable, see United States v. Brown ,305 F.3d 304, 310 (5th Cir. 2002), Patterson’s constructiveamendment claim likewise fails. Accordingly, Patterson’s motion to expand COA is DENIED.

Because Apprendi does not apply to cases on collateral review, the district court’s denial of Patterson’s claim that his indictment, conviction, and sentence violated Apprendi is

AFFIRMED. See id.
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO EXPAND COA DENIED.