alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant      to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)**

**Under      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of      2002**

| 1      | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of       |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                          |
|   |                                                                                                             |
| 2      | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, |
|   | the                financial condition and the results of operations of the                Company.              |

| Date                September 6, 2006                |                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |                                          |
| /s/                Father Gregory Ofiesh             | /s/                Father Gregory Ofiesh .    |
| Father                Gregory Ofiesh                 | Father                Gregory Ofiesh          |
| President                and Chief executive Officer | Acting                Chief Financial Officer |
|                                                 |                                          |
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply580Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Laura Anthony ... (not verified)PermalinkNovember 9, 2017 - 1:12pmYou are "the one" who will be missed - happy trails upon your retirement next month!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Gordon J. Phillips, Inc., et al., Respondents, v John Maume et al., Appellants.

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs, a construction company and its president, sued defendants, the Monroe County Water Authority (Authority) and John Maume, its manager of design and construction, based on memoranda Maume wrote in connection with plaintiffs’ past performance on various Authority projects. Plaintiffs alleged that the memoranda and attachments contained false and defamatory statements and resulted in the Authority awarding two contracts to other contractors even though plaintiffs had submitted lower bids. Plaintiffs also alleged that defendants deprived them of their due process and equal protection rights under 42 USC § 1983.

Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of plaintiffs’ section 1983 claim. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants discriminated against them by failing to apply the same or similar standards to all contractors in determining the lowest responsible bidder on public works contracts. Defendants’ motion papers fail to establish that plaintiffs’ equal protection claim lacks merit as *987a matter of law *(see, Three Rivs. Cablevision v City of Pittsburgh,*502 F Supp 1118, 1133).

Supreme Court also properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of plaintiffs’ punitive damages claims. There is a question of fact whether the Authority is a public benefit corporation entitled to an exemption from such damages *(see, Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. R. R. Co.,*70 NY2d 382, 386-387). Defendant Maume may also be liable for punitive damages for torts committed within the scope of his employment *(see, Sharapata v Town of Islip,*56 NY2d 332, 338).

Supreme Court erred, however, in denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of plaintiffs’ defamation cause of action. The alleged defamatory statements were privileged because they were made by Maume in the discharge of his public duty *(see, Toker v Pollak,*44 NY2d 211, 219) to the Authority, which itself was privileged under the circumstances *(see, Stukuls v State of New York,*42 NY2d 272, 277-279). Moreover, plaintiffs have failed to establish that the statements were made with actual malice *(see, Clark v Somers,*162 AD2d 982, 983). The existence of earlier disputes between the parties is insufficient *(see, Shapiro v Health Ins. Plan,*7 NY2d 56, 64; *Friedman v Ergin,*110 AD2d 620, 621, *affd*66 NY2d 645).

We have considered the remaining contentions raised by each party and find them lacking in merit. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply550Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Michael J Lill... (not verified)PermalinkDecember 15, 2016 - 2:07pmTHANK YOU FOR YOUR DEDICATION, ESPECIALLY THE CARVING.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
112 P.3d 781

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

June 6, 2005

26628

#### State v. Apisaloma

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.3





Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 US.C. Section, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Bowen S. Diehl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Capital Southwest Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.







Date:  December 13, 2018By:/s/ Bowen S. DiehlBowen S. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of eClickMD, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
"Company") Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neil Burley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the
18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (SS) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


/s/ NEIL BURLEY
-----------------------
Neil Burley
Chief Financial Officer

May 21, 2003
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-1779EA

_____________

Billie Calloway, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Eleanor L. V. Cox, Jointly and severally *

and her insurance carrier in her official *

capacity as Principal with the Little *

Rock Public School System; Little Rock *

School District, Jointly and severally *

and its insurance carrier in its official *

capacity as a public school corporate in *

its own name for the Little Rock Public * Appeal from the United States 

School System; Allene S. Christopher, * District Court for the Eastern

Jointly and severally and her insurance * District of Arkansas.

carrier in her former official capacity as *

Public Employee Claims Manager; Jon * [UNPUBLISHED]

H. Dodson, Jointly and severally and his *

insurance carrier in his official capacity *

as Medical Doctor for Forest Park *

Medical Clinic and Cambridge *

Rehabilitation Center and Forest Park *

Medical Clinic and Cambridge *

Rehabilitation Center Pro Se Collection *

Agency; Gregory S. Kaczenski, Jointly *

and severally and his insurance carrier *

in his official capacity as *

Neuropsychiatrist and State Board *

Certified Neuropsychiatrist with *

Kaczenski Private Practice; Does, I *
-2-

through X, Inclusive, *

*

Appellees. *

_____________

 Submitted: November 14, 1997

Filed: November 19, 1997

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Billie Calloway appeals the district court's dismissal of Calloway's time-barred

complaint asserting federal civil rights and state law claims. Having reviewed the

record and the parties' submissions, we are satisfied that the district court correctly

dismissed Calloway's complaint. We also conclude the district court's denial of

Calloway's motion for appointment of counsel was not an abuse of discretion. We thus

affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### State v. Higa

17737

6/13/95

Denied

79 Hawai'i 1897 P.2d 928
#### Nerak Realty Corp., Respondent, *v.*Cargo Packers, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

March 24, 1959.

*Jacob W. Friedman*for appellant.

*Michael Levine for*respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Under the circumstances here disclosed, no sum-

mary proceeding is maintainable against the tenant-appellant Cargo Packers, Inc., predicated on the tenant-assignee’s nonpayment of rent due under the lease. The landlord’s remedy, if it be so advised, is by way of an action at law at which its right to recover the rent here sued for can be litigated and determined *(Radlog Realty Corp.*v. *Geiger,*254 App. Div. 352; *S. Z. B. Corp.*v. *Weinman & Wynn,*53 N. Y. S. 2d 303).

The final order and judgment as against the tenant-appellant Cargo Packers, Inc., should be unauimously reversed on the *931law, with $30 costs to that appellant, and petition as against it dismissed with appropriate costs in the court below; without prejudice to the landlord’s right, if it be so advised, to bring an action at law for the rent claimed to be due.

Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Benjamin, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.
EXHIBIT (24) 10
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


The  undersigned,  as  President  of Public  Service  Company of  Oklahoma  (the
"Company"), hereby makes, constitutes and appoints R. Russell Davis his true and
lawful  attorney-in-fact  and agent, with full power and authority to execute in
the  name and on  behalf  of the  undersigned,  in any and all  capacities,  the
Company's  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K  for  1998  and any and all  amendments
thereto, to be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and
any other documents and instruments  incidental  thereto,  and to file the same,
with all exhibits  thereto and all documents in connection  therewith,  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission,  hereby granting to such  attorney-in-fact,
and agents,  full power and  authority of  substitution  and  revocation  in the
premises  and full power and  authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully for
all intents  and  purposes  as the  undersigned  might or could do in person and
hereby ratifying and confirming all that such  attorney-in-fact  and agents, may
do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have hereunto  executed this Power of Attorney this 19th
day of January, 1999.


                                       /s/ T.D. Churchwell
                                           T.D. Churchwell
                                           President and Director

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of January, 1999 by T.D.
Churchwell.

                                       /s/ Lina P. Holm
                                           Notary Public

My Commission Expires:     01-28-2003
26445

#### State v. Puni

Affirmed
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                                   Exhibit 12.1



                                              AMEREN CORPORATION
                                Computation Of Ratio Of Earnings To Fixed Charges
                                      (Thousands of Dollars Except Ratios)


                                                                               Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                                               --------------------------------
                                                                  1999          2000         2001          2002          2003
                                                                  ----          ----         ----          ----          ----

<S>                                                             <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Net income from continuing operations                            385,095       457,094       475,386       382,065       505,729
Income taxes                                                     253,490       298,623       305,667       236,320       301,209
Fixed charges                                                    193,151       204,631       222,671       239,140       303,234

Less:
  Preference security dividend requirements of consolidated
  subsidiaries                                                   (20,977)      (20,997)      (20,447)      (17,547)      (17,330)
                                                               ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
Total earnings                                                   810,759       939,351       983,277       839,978     1,092,842


Fixed Charges:

Interest expense                                                 168,275       179,706       198,648       218,741       281,735
Estimated interest costs within rental expense                     3,899         3,928         3,576         2,852         4,169

Preference security dividend requirements of consolidated
subsidiaries:
  Preference dividends of consolidated subsidiaries               12,650        12,700        12,445        10,841        10,861
  Adjustment to pre-tax basis                                      8,327         8,297         8,002         6,706         6,469
                                                               ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
                                                                  20,977        20,997        20,447        17,547        17,330


Total fixed charges                                              193,151       204,631       222,671       239,140       303,234

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                  4.20          4.59          4.42          3.51          3.60

</TABLE>
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2426Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Julie lause (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 4, 2021 - 10:47amI live to hear the history and see the details of the architecture. I’m the geeking America tourist gawks at such works of art and takes picture of if. I appreciate the vision and skill that it takes to bring it to fruition because that’s what I lack.
Keep up the good work! God bless our United States of America and the people who built it!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe