alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)**

**of****the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofDynTek, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, theChief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that based on my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  the Report of the Company filed today pursuant toSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the“Exchange Act”), fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 14, 2005 | /s/ Casper Zublin, Jr. |   |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                          | Casper Zublin, Jr.     |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer     |

 

----
**Central
      Illinois Light Company**
      **Computation
      Of Ratio Of Earnings To Fixed Charges And Preferred Stock Dividend
      Requirements**
      **(Thousands
      of Dollars, Except Ratios)****Year
      Ended December 31,****2000**
    
    **2001**
    
    **2002**
    
    **2003**
    
    **2004**Net
      Income
    
    $
    47,777
    
    $
    14,638
    
    $
    50,128
    
    $
    44,883
    
    $
    32,384Add-
      Extraordinary items net of tax
    
    
    -
    
    
    -
    
    
    -
    
    
    (24,080
    )
    
    -Net
      income from continuing operations
    
    
    47,777
    
    
    14,638
    
    
    50,128
    
    
    20,803
    
    
    32,384Taxes
      based on income
    
    
    26,227
    
    
    7,789
    
    
    26,472
    
    
    11,905
    
    
    5,450Net
      income before income taxes
    
    
    74,004
    
    
    22,427
    
    
    76,600
    
    
    32,708
    
    
    37,834Add-
      fixed charges:Interest
      on long term debt
    
    
    17,516
    
    
    17,678
    
    
    19,006
    
    
    14,279
    
    
    9,698Other
      interest
    
    
    10,024
    
    
    10,333
    
    
    8,190
    
    
    2,079
    
    
    5,481Rentals
    
    
    1,480
    
    
    857
    
    
    1,619
    
    
    1,468
    
    
    395Amortization
      of net debt premium, discount,expenses
      and losses
    
    
    423
    
    
    414
    
    
    544
    
    
    708
    
    
    611Total
      fixed charges
    
    
    29,443
    
    
    29,282
    
    
    29,359
    
    
    18,534
    
    
    16,185Earnings
      available for fixed charges
    
    $
    103,447
    
    $
    51,709
    
    $
    105,959
    
    $
    51,242
    
    $
    54,019Ratio
      of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    3.51
    
    
    1.76
    
    
    3.60
    
    
    2.76
    
    
    3.33Earnings
      required for preferred dividends:Preferred
      stock dividends
    
    
    2,977
    
    
    2,159
    
    
    2,159
    
    
    2,127
    
    
    2,062Adjustment
      to pre-tax basis
    
    
    1,634
    
    
    1,149
    
    
    1,140
    
    
    1,217
    
    
    3464,611
    
    
    3,308
    
    
    3,299
    
    
    3,344
    
    
    2,408Fixed
      charges plus preferred stock dividendrequirements
    
    $
    34,054
    
    $
    32,590
    
    $
    32,658
    
    $
    21,878
    
    $
    18,593Ratio
      of earnings to fixed charges pluspreferred
      stock dividend requirements
    
    
    3.03
    
    
    1.58
    
    
    3.24
    
    
    2.34
    
    
    2.90
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply617Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Michael J Lill... (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 15, 2019 - 11:08amAgain Thank You for all the sites you share with us,  so many photos are never seen when we visit.  At 82 years getting around is difficult, these "tours" then are a blessing.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply567Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  MICHAEL Lilly ... (not verified)PermalinkJuly 24, 2017 - 1:09pmAgain thank you for history lesson on our capital.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Kings County Trust Company, as Trustee under the Will of Guy Loomis, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

April 22, 1959.

*Wren •& Schmid*for petitioner.

*Louis J. LefJcoivits, Attorney-General,*for charitable beneficiaries.

*Donovan, Leisure, Newtown & Irvine*for Girl Scout Council of Greater New York, Inc,

*694Maximilian Moss, S.

In this accounting by the trustee of a trust created in article “Ninth” of the will, a determination is sought that literal compliance with the direction therein as to the disposition of the income to the named income beneficiary is impracticable or impossible; and by reason thereof the trustee seeks approval of its proposed disposition of the trust principal and undistributed income. By the terms of the said article the net income was to be paid in monthly installments to a home for girls so long as the home was conducted where it was then located or elsewhere. If it appeared to the trustee that in its judgment circumstances so changed at any time as to render it “unnecessary, undesirable, impracticable or impossible” literally to comply with the provisions of the trust, then the trustee was to ‘* pay the principal of the trust to the Brooklyn Girl Scouts, Inc.” The petitioner was informed that the income beneficiary closed its home on July 15,1956, and it has been indicated that it will not be reopened. On December 16, 1940, the Brooklyn Girl Scouts, Inc., consolidated with six Girl Scout groups then active in New York and it is now a component by said consolidation of “ Girl Scouts Council of Greater New York, Inc.” with offices in this county for the direction of Girl Scout activities in Brooklyn.

The petitioner has concluded that in its judgment the trust established in said “ Ninth ” article of the will has terminated and that the trust principal and income accumulated since October 22, 1956 are presently payable to Girl Scouts Council of Greater New York, Inc., to be applied by it for the purposes of its Girl Scout activities in Brooklyn, New York.

The court is fully in accord with the determination of the trustee that circumstances have arisen and so changed since the execution of the testator’s will, as to render unnecessary, undesirable, impracticable or impossible a literal compliance with the testator’s direction in article “ Ninth ” of his will to pay the trust income to Grace Nettleton Home for Girls, of Harrogate, Tennessee, and that the said trust has terminated. The principal and undistributed income thereof from October 22,1956, shall be distributed to “ Girl Scouts Council of Greater New York, Inc.” the successor by consolidation with the “ Brooklyn Girl Scouts, Inc. ”, the beneficiary named in said article, to be applied by said consolidated Girl Scouts Council for the purposes of its activities in Brooklyn, New York.

Settle decree on notice.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2290

JOSEPH PIRELA , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ILEANA ROS

- LEHTINEN; HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES; THE CONGRESS OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WASHINGTON, DC; HOUSE OF PROSTITUTION UNKNOWN BAR OF HOMOSEXUALS, (Sex Workers Tranvestitutes

- Prostitutes); ALOYMA SANCHEZ; THOMAS WILLIAMS; MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE STATE OF FLORIDA PROCEEDINGS PROSECUTIONS; UNKNOWN BAR OF HOMOSEXUALS; SEX WORKERS 33 HEALTH CARE BAKER ACT OF JACKSON HOSPITAL; (4) TRANSVESTITE MATTHEW JOHN Prostitute Homosexual; DAVID COUNTIN, (1) Client; DON SMITH; DENIS FONSECA; ANGEL MIRANDA; CARLOS ALVAREZ; CITY OF MIAMI , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the E astern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , Chief District Judge. ( 5:17

- cv
- 00541

- D )

Submitted : January 30 , 2018 Decided: February 1, 2018

Before MOTZ and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Joseph Pirela, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Joseph Pirela seeks to appeal the district court’s order s re assigning his case to a
certain d istrict court judge and referring his motion to proceed in forma pauperis to a magistrate judge . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012) ; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order s Pirela seeks to appeal are neither final order s nor appealable interlocutory or collateral order s . Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000879313
<NAME> SIGNET WIRELESS INC
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         467,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,506,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,539,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,442,977
<PP&E>                                      52,137,706
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             333,296,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,313,560
<BONDS>                                    302,641,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        91,706
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,246,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               333,296,240
<SALES>                                    76,934,0590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            76,934,059
<CGS>                                       16,794,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               61,859,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               314,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          21,612,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,879,448)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,879,448)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,879,448)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 926 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 926

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the provision of 
     guide dogs to veterans blinded by a service-connected injury.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2015

  Mr. Amodei introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the provision of 
     guide dogs to veterans blinded by a service-connected injury.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROVISION OF GUIDE DOGS TO CERTAIN BLIND VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 1714 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b)(1) The Secretary shall provide guide dogs trained for the aid 
of the blind to a veteran who--
            ``(A) is blind by reason of a service-connected injury;
            ``(B) is enrolled under section 1705 of this title; and
            ``(C) elects to receive such a dog.
    ``(2) The Secretary may provide guide dogs trained for the aid of 
the blind to a veteran who is--
            ``(A) enrolled under section 1705 of this title; and
            ``(B) not otherwise described under paragraph (1)(A).
    ``(3) The Secretary may also provide a veteran described in 
paragraph (1) or (2) with mechanical or electronic equipment for aiding 
them in overcoming the disability of blindness.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1714(d) of such title is amended 
by striking ``subsection (b) or (c)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1) or 
(2) of subsection (b) or subsection (c)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         557,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,921,360
<ALLOWANCES>                               (2,478,099)
<INVENTORY>                                    966,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,029,869
<PP&E>                                       1,676,522
<DEPRECIATION>                               (776,368)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,648,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,198,883
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,589,555
<PREFERRED>                                    505,000
<COMMON>                                           972
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,633,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,648,481
<SALES>                                     17,309,242
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,309,242
<CGS>                                        9,885,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,885,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,038,368
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             304,338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,285,395)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,285,395)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                  (1,285,395)
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Travis Shane Brown, Appellant

No. 06-14-00233-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

F-1418343-J). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Travis Shane Brown, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 21, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 179 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 179

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary 
 of Defense should review section 504 of title 10, United States Code, 
 for purposes related to enlisting certain aliens in the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2015

  Mr. Foster (for himself, Mr. Polis, Mr. Vargas, Mr. Caardenas, Mr. 
  Rangel, Ms. Brownley of California, Ms. Edwards, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. 
 Veasey, and Mr. Takano) submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary 
 of Defense should review section 504 of title 10, United States Code, 
 for purposes related to enlisting certain aliens in the Armed Forces.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the Secretary of Defense should review section 504 of title 10, United 
States Code, for the purpose of making a determination and 
authorization pursuant to subsection (b)(2) of such section regarding 
the enlistment in the Armed Forces of an alien who possesses an 
employment authorization document issued under the Deferred Action for 
Childhood Arrivals program of the Department of Homeland Security 
established pursuant to the memorandum of the Secretary of Homeland 
Security dated June 15, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7127

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHNNIE WILSON DALE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (1:01-cr-00052-2; 1:04-cv-00023)

Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 3, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnnie Wilson Dale, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Johnnie Wilson Dale seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dale has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED