alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14




                   AMENDMENT TO SUBORDINATED CREDIT AGREEMENT


         AMENDMENT TO SUBORDINATED CREDIT AGREEMENT, dated as of November 6,
2000 (as amended from time to time, the "Agreement"; capitalized terms used and
not otherwise defined herein having the definitions provided therefor in the
Agreement), by and between TWON SPORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a New York
corporation (the "Borrower") and CAPITALSOURCE FINANCE LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company ("Lender").

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Agreement in accordance
with the terms thereof as provided herein.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties to this Agreement hereby agree as
follows:

         Amendment to Section 2.3-"Procedures for Borrowing" Section 2.3 of the
Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety and replaced by the following:

         As a condition to each Advance, Borrower shall deliver to Lender, prior
to 11:00 a.m. (New York time) on any Business Day which is not less than (5)
days prior to the date of such requested Advance (which date shall be a Business
Day), or such shorter period of time as may be acceptable to the Lender, an
irrevocable written notice substantially in the form of Exhibit B hereto (each,
a "Borrowing Notice") duly executed by an Authorized Officer of Borrower. Each
Borrowing Notice shall be effective upon receipt by the Lender and shall (a)
specify the amount of the requested Advance and the date that such Advance is to
be made and (b) certify that each of the conditions set forth in Section 4.2
hereof has been satisfied as of the date of such Borrowing Notice.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, should any amount required to be paid hereunder
or under any other Loan Document be unpaid, such amount may be paid by the
Lender and the payment thereof shall be deemed a request for an Advance as of
the date such payment is due.



                                      * * *
<PAGE>
         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
of November 1, 2001.

                                        TOWN SPORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                        By: /s/ R.G. Pyle
                                            ---------------------------
                                        Name:   R.G. Pyle
                                        Title:  Chief Financial Officer


                                        CAPITALSOURCE HOLDINGS LLC

                                        By: /s/ Steven Museles
                                            ---------------------------
                                        Name:   Steven A. Museles
                                        Title:  Senior Vice President
##### 



Exhibit 31.13
  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
    CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY
    (required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
    Form 10-K
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e))
  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared; b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and    a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 1,
    2007
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Steam Powered Amphibious Boat, 1804
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

In 1802 American inventor Oliver Evans developed a high-pressure steam engine that produced more power and weighed less than earlier models. His design made it practical to use steam power for land vehicles, such as trains, or boats. The mural is set in 1804 and depicts the nation's first steam-powered amphibious dredging scow, using one of Evans's engines, entering the Schuylkill River.

**Left:** The steamboat on the Platte River symbolizes the breakthrough in water travel made possible by Evans's invention.

**Right:** The world's first railroad suspension bridge (designed by John Roebling, who would later create the Brooklyn Bridge), symbolizing steam-powered land travel, spans the Niagara River near Niagara Falls.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The central east-west corridor is referred to as the Great Experiment Hall because it chronicles in 16 murals the legislative milestones of three centuries, from the signing of the Mayflower Compact in 1629 to the enactment of women's suffrage in 1920. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Green Bus Lines, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Tully & Di Napoli, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

December 23, 1958.

*514*Garvey <& Cohen (Donald E. Byrne*of counsel), for appellant.

*Bernard Shatskin*and *Jerome Cooper*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Neither section 12 nor section 4 (subd. [a], par. 8) of the Traffic Regulations of the City of New York was applicable to the facts of this case. The court erred in charging both sections of the Traffic Regulations. In any event, plaintiff adduced no evidence whatsoever of any negligent act on the part of the defendant. At most plaintiff’s testimony, given full credence, shows that plaintiff, while driving along, was involved in a collision which it could not explain and for which it could assign no cause. This does not justify an inference that the defendant was negligent. Under the circumstances the complaint should have been dismissed. *(Taggart*v. *Vogel,*3 N Y 2d 58; *Boronkay*v. *Robinson & Carpenter,*247 N. Y. 365; *Thies*v. *Reich Bros. Long Is. Motor Frgt.,*247 App. Div. 900, affd. 273 N. Y. 552.)

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law with costs to the appellant and complaint dismissed with costs.

Concur —Pette, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julius D. Lee, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), rendered August 11, 1989, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (three counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defen*579dant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 229 (Thursday, November 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 83566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26273]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4699-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


California; Amendment No. 9 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of California (FEMA-4699-DR), dated April 3, 2023, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued November 1, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of California is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of April 3, 2023.

    Mariposa and Tuolumne Counties for snow assistance under the 
Public Assistance program for any continuous 48-hour period during 
or proximate the incident period (already designated for Individual 
Assistance and Public Assistance).
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-26273 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10119

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARNOLDO MENDOZA LEPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:17-CR-40-2

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arnoldo Mendoza 

Lepez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lepez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently 

developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Lepez’s claims of ineffective 

assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 10, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10119 Document: 00515111188 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2019
No. 19-10119

2

prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 

(5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Lepez’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-10119 Document: 00515111188 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/10/2019
#### Bruce Cohen et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiff, *v.*Martin Hansen, Respondent. Bruce Cohen et al., Appellants, *v.*Martin Hansen, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

January 23, 1959.

*E. Edan*Spencer, *Jerome Margulies, Emanuel Morganvellse*and *Robert D. Foglia*for appellants.

*John G. Crowe*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment in favor of the defendant on his counterclaim against the plaintiffs William Cohen and Bruce Cohen and against all of the plaintiffs dismissing the complaint should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, with $30 costs, and judgment directed against the defendant, with appropriate costs in the court below, in the following respects: In favor of the plaintiff William Cohen in the sum of $489.85 for his property damage; in favor of the plaintiff Gladys Cohen in the sum of $200 for her personal injuries; in favor of the plaintiff Bruce Cohen in the sum of $75 for his personal injuries and *624in favor of the plaintiffs Bruce Cohen and William Cohen dismissing the counterclaim on the merits.

When Hansen proceeded into the intersection after having stopped at the stop sign without first ascertaining the condition of traffic along Avenue F, he was guilty of negligence and his negligence was the sole competent producing cause of the collision between his automobile and that owned by William Cohen. Bruce Cohen, the driver of the plaintiff’s automobile, when confronted with the fact that Hansen drove his ear into Avenue F, under the circumstances appearing in the record, acted as a reasonable and prudent person and was not negligent in the operation of the automobile. The facts do not warrant the finding by the trial court below that Bruce Cohen was negligent. In view of the fact that William Cohen was not in his automobile at the time of the accident, he is entitled to recover judgment against the defendant for property damage *(Mills*v. *Gabriel,*259 App. Div. 60, motion for leave to appeal granted 259 App. Div. 818, affd. 284 N. Y. 755). Gladys Cohen could not be charged with contributory negligence under the circumstances as shown to have existed at the time of the happening of the accident.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Di Giovanna, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.
February 14, 2007

27570

#### State v. Amondson

Affirmed
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 7 (Thursday, January 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 2295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 55-23694-SP; ASLBP No. 13-925-01-SP-BD01]


Charlissa C. Smith; Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing 
Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission, see 37 FR 28,710 (Dec. 
29, 1972), and the Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR Sec. Sec.  
2.103(b), 2.300, 2.309, 2.313(a), 2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby 
given that an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being 
established to preside over the following proceeding:

Charlissa C. Smith, (Denial of Senior Reactor Operator License).

    This proceeding concerns a hearing request from Charlissa C. Smith, 
dated December 5, 2012, challenging a denial letter from the Office of 
Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated 
November 15, 2012 notifying her that, following an administrative 
review, the NRC is in agreement with Region II's decision of May 11, 
2012 not to issue her a Senior Reactor Operator License for the Vogtle 
Power Station.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Alan S. Rosenthal, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Ronald M. Spritzer, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Brian K. Hajek, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

    As provided in 10 CFR 2.302, all correspondence, documents, and 
other materials shall be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing 
rule, which the NRC promulgated in August 2007 (72 FR 49,139).

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 4th day of January 2013.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2013-00328 Filed 1-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
  SECTION 1350
    CERTIFICATION OF
    AMEREN CORPORATION
    (required by Section 906 of the
    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  Form 10-K Form 10-K),
  (1)
    The
    Form 10-K
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
    or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the
    Form 10-K
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date:
    February 29, 2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of KHD Humboldt Wedag International Ltd.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
# C_2016202EN.01017801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/178 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/178

---

Article 305

(ex Article 263, second, third and fourth paragraphs, TEC)

(ex Article 263, second, third and fourth paragraphs, TEC)

The number of members of the Committee of the Regions shall not exceed 350.

The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt a decision determining the Committee's composition.

The members of the Committee and an equal number of alternate members shall be appointed for five years. Their term of office shall be renewable. The Council shall adopt the list of members and alternate members drawn up in accordance with the proposals made by each Member State. When the mandate referred to in Article 300(3) on the basis of which they were proposed comes to an end, the term of office of members of the Committee shall terminate automatically and they shall then be replaced for the remainder of the said term of office in accordance with the same procedure. No member of the Committee shall at the same time be a Member of the European Parliament.

---
21118

#### State v. Tran

Affirmed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

TERRY LEE KUEHNER,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 45 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL MANAGER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned,   Linda  J.  Haines,   Principal  Financial  Manager  of  Nutrition
Management  Services Company, a Pennsylvania  corporation (the "Company"),  does
hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2003 of
the Company (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and  the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                              /s/ Linda J. Haines
                                              -------------------
                                              Linda J. Haines
                                              Principal Financial Manager

November 14, 2003
```