T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S A L A D IN R U S H D A N , A K A W o o d s, A K A R o b ertW o o d s, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. T . P E R B U L A , C o u n s e l o ra tC MF V a c a v ille ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 16911 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 6 - c v - 0 0 7 2 9 - G EBK JN ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G ar l and E . B urr e l l , J r . , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2011 ** B e f o r e : G O O D W I N , W A L L A C E , an dM c K E O W N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . S a l a di n R us hdan appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nti n hi s 42 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g f e d e r a l an ds tate law c la im s in c o n n e c tio n w ith h is a tt e m pt s t o e nf

or c e the t e rm s of

as e tt l e m e nta gr e e m e nt . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on



# FI LED JAN 12 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 16911 2 u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , W y at t v . T e rhune , 315 F . 3d 1108, 1 1 1 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ( f

a ilu r e to e x h au s t a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s ) ; B arnet t v. C e ntoni , 31 F . 3d 813, 816 ( 9th C i r . 1994) ( pe rc ur i a m ) ( F e d. R . C i v. P . 12( b) ( 6) d is m is s a l) . W e m aya f

f irm o n a n yb a s is s up p o rte db yth e r e c o r d , V aldez v . R os e nbaum , 3 0 2 F. 3 d1 0 3 9 , 1 0 4 3 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 2 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. D is m is s a l o f

R u s h d an ’s § 1 9 8 3 c la im s w a s p r o p e rb e c au s e R u s h d an f a ile dto e x h au s t a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s a s to h is c la im s a g a in s t R a m ir e z - P a lm e r , H a ll, P e rb u la , S tr a tto n , an dD o v e y . Se e W oodf ord v . N go , 548 U . S . 81, 85, 93- 95 ( 2006) ( h o ld in g th a t “p r o p e re x h au s tio n ” is m an d a to rya n dr e q u ir e s a d h e r e n c e to a d m in is tr a tiv e p r o c e du r a l ru le s ) . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed R ushd an’ s s t at e l aw cl ai m s f or fa i l ure to a lle g e c o m p lian c e w ith th e C a lif o rn iaT o rt C la im s A c t a s r e q u ir e df o ra n yc iv il c o m p la in t f

o rm o n e yd a m a g e s a g a in s t ap ub lic e n tityo re m p lo y e e . See C al. G o v ’t C ode §§ 911. 2, 945. 4; B ai nes P i ck w i ck L td. v. C i t

y of L os A ng eles , 85 C al . Rptr. 2d 74 , 77 (C t . A pp . 19 99 ) ( “ [T ] he cl ai m s pre se nt at i on re qu i re m ent s are no tl i m i t ed t o t ortc l a i m s , bute xt e nd a l s o t o c l a i m s f orm one yorda m a ge s ba s e d on c o n tr a c t.” ) . W e do notc ons i de rm a tt e r s nots pe c i f i c a l l ya nd di s t i nc t l yr a i s e d and ar gue d i n the ope ni ng br i e f

, nora r gum e nt s a nd a l l e ga t i ons r a i s e d f orthe f i r s tt i m e on10- 16911 3 ap p e a l. Se e P adge t t

v . W r i ght , 58 7 F . 3d 98 3, 98 5 n . 2 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( per c uri am ). R ushd an’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.