alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 (the “Report”),
I, L’Sheryl D. Hudson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                   
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 14, 2015 |  | /s/ L’Sheryl D. Hudson                            
|                    |  | L’Sheryl D. Hudson
        Chief Financial Officer
# Florida_county_differentials_20
Exhibit 10(a)  


April 19, 2002 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life Insurance Company

2801 Highway 201 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 


Directors:



        We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 4 to
the registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-41577) filed by Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company and Variable Annuity Account A of Protective Life with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 













Sincerely,

SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

By: /s/  DAVID S. GOLDSTEIN     








David S. Goldstein
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998             APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                              72                     645
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,194                  12,428
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     64,677                  47,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,016                  66,394
<PP&E>                                          19,162                  16,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,306                  90,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,904                  14,785
<BONDS>                                         51,321                  16,130
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             5                       5
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,794                  59,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,306                  90,825
<SALES>                                         44,796                  31,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,796                  31,707
<CGS>                                           28,029                  19,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,508                     457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,232                   3,849
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,772                   1,506
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,461                   2,343
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,461                   2,343
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48                     .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46                     .45
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 5

SECTION 5

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 256

(ex Article 225 TEC)

(ex Article 225 TEC)

1.   The General Court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine at first instance actions or proceedings referred to in Articles 263, 265, 268, 270 and 272, with the exception of those assigned to a specialised court set up under Article 257 and those reserved in the Statute for the Court of Justice. The Statute may provide for the General Court to have jurisdiction for other classes of action or proceeding.

Decisions given by the General Court under this paragraph may be subject to a right of appeal to the Court of Justice on points of law only, under the conditions and within the limits laid down by the Statute.

2.   The General Court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine actions or proceedings brought against decisions of the specialised courts.

Decisions given by the General Court under this paragraph may exceptionally be subject to review by the Court of Justice, under the conditions and within the limits laid down by the Statute, where there is a serious risk of the unity or consistency of Union law being affected.

3.   The General Court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine questions referred for a preliminary ruling under Article 267, in specific areas laid down by the Statute.

Where the General Court considers that the case requires a decision of principle likely to affect the unity or consistency of Union law, it may refer the case to the Court of Justice for a ruling.

Decisions given by the General Court on questions referred for a preliminary ruling may exceptionally be subject to review by the Court of Justice, under the conditions and within the limits laid down by the Statute, where there is a serious risk of the unity or consistency of Union law being affected.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2
IEA Income Fund XII, L.P.
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
               I, John Kallas, certify that:
               1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income FundXII, L.P. (the “Registrant”);
               2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
               3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
               4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:
                    (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
                    (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on ourevaluation; and
                    (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
               5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
                    (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
                    (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004
/s/ JOHN KALLASJohn KallasVice President andChief Financial Officer of CCC
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 965 

To require the issuance of guidance on the application of the Federal policy 

for the protection of human subjects with respect to clinical data registries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2015 

Mr. PASCRELL (for himself and Mr. BOUSTANY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the issuance of guidance on the application of 

the Federal policy for the protection of human subjects 

with respect to clinical data registries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Facilitating Participa5 tion in Clinical Data Registries Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GUIDANCE ON APPLICATION OF COMMON RULE TO 

7 CLINICAL DATA REGISTRIES. 

8 Not later than one year after the date of the enact9 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human 

10 Services, through the Office for Human Research ProtecVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:56 Feb 25, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H965.IH H965

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 965 IH

1 tions of the Department of Health and Human Services, 

2 shall issue guidance on the application with respect to clin3 ical data registries of the provisions of subpart A of part 

4 46 of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, or equivalent 

5 Federal regulations for the protection of human subjects 

6 in research. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
July 22, 1998

20565

#### State v. Fergerstrom

Affirmed
BE Aerospace, Inc. • Life Support Systems •10800 Pflumm Road • Lenexa, KS 66215 USA 

TEL: +1.913.338.9800 • FAX: +1.913.469.8419 • www.beaerospace.com

Dear Mr. Blancaneaux, 

B/E Aerospace is able to state that container assemblies that were manufactured after 

March 1, 2006 did not contain masks that were manufactured before March 1, 2006. 

After they left our facility and were delivered to Airbus we can assume that Airbus did not 

replace the new masks with spares prior to delivery to the airlines. From the time that the 

airlines took delivery, we can no longer confirm that the masks installed would still be the 

original installed masks. This is up to the airline to maintain records of their maintenance 

and should be able to know what masks are installed if they changed any. This 

information could be used by the airlines to assist with their logistics planning for 

incorporating the AD, but should not be used as a means to not inspect the masks. 

Based upon our recommended maintenance intervals defined in 174095-SIL-1 and the 

subsequent EASA SIB 2010-25, the airlines should be inspecting these masks on a 

regular basis. We strongly recommend this action as a means to ensure the continued 

airworthiness of the masks. 

Sincerely, 

Jon Maack 

Product Support Specialist 

BE Aerospace, Inc. 

Life Support Systems
Exhibit 23.4

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

 

  

We consent to the inclusion as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital Southwest Corporation of our report dated May 31, 2018,  relating to the financial statements of TitanLiner, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017 We also consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Capital Southwest Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-207296, effective October 5, 2015; File No. 333-177433, effective October 21, 2011; File No. 333-177432, effective October 21, 2011; File No. 333-118681, effective August 31, 2004).

 

/s/ Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P.

 

Fort Worth, Texas

June 5, 2018

 

 

----
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 16, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00900-CV 

DOMANCIO CASTILLO, Appellant 

V. 

SAVING GRACE #22 LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02837-A 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Molberg, Carlyle, and Smith 

Opinion by Justice Smith 

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated June 2, 2023 we 

informed appellant his brief was overdue and directed him to file his brief within ten 

days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of 

this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed his brief or 

otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 
 –2– 

We dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). 

220900F.P05 

 

/Craig Smith/

CRAIG SMITH 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

DOMANCIO CASTILLO, Appellant 

No. 05-22-00900-CV V. 

SAVING GRACE #22 LLC, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02837-

A. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. 

Justices Molberg and Carlyle 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered August 16, 2023
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply411Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Lynn Slight (n... (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 2, 2016 - 6:19pmThank you very much for this information. Pringle was born on 8 April 1790 in Tranent, Scotland ( about 7 miles from my home ) He married Catherine Murray on 24 August 1815 at Inveresk Eastlothian. I am not sure when they left for the USA. Pringle was baptised on 18th April 1790 and one witness was George Slight , his father ( Alexander's ) brother. George Slight is my Grandfather x6 removed. Glad to hear he was a Master Carpenter - this must run in the family - father, grandfather , great grandfather !
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 8, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40953 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSEPH NOVAK, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-35-1

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Joseph Novak has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
### Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 8472 Dir ID 2014

- NM

- 106

- AD

C on t acts. W ith w h

o

m o u

tside t he F A A h a

s th i s prop os

al been di s cu

s

sed?

Organ i zat i on P erson C ont a

cted D ate R e s

pon s

e

N at i o n a l B u s ine s s Air c r af t As s o ci at i o n E li C ott i 5 / 21 / 1 4

Re g i o n a l Airline A ss o ci at i o n 5 / 21 / 1 4

Air c r af t O w ners & P il ot s A s s o ci at i o n R o bert Ha ck m a n 5 / 21 / 1 4

Airlines fo r A m e r ica R o bert I r e l a nd 5 / 21 / 1 4
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00096]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD


Second Extension of Hearing Record Closure Date

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

ACTION: Second extension of hearing record closure date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) published 
a document in the Federal Register on August 15, 2012, (77 FR 48970), 
as amended, September 7, 2012, (77 FR 55196). The publication concerned 
notice of a hearing and meeting on October 2, 2012, regarding safety-
related aspects of the design and factors that could affect the timely 
execution of the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) project at the Y-12 
National Security Complex. The Board stated in the August 15, 2012, 
hearing notice that the hearing record would remain open until November 
2, 2012, for the receipt of additional materials. The Board 
subsequently extended the hearing record closure date to January 2, 
2013 (77 FR 65871).
    Extension of Time: The Board now extends the period of time for 
which the hearing record will remain open to January 16, 2013, to 
further accommodate submission of answers to questions taken for the 
record during the course of the public hearing.
    Contact Person for Further Information: Debra H. Richardson, Deputy 
General Manager, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana 
Avenue NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901, (800) 788-4016. This 
is a toll-free number.

    Dated: January 2, 2013.
Peter S. Winokur,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2013-00096 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.3 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Quarterly Report of Goodys Family Clothing, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David
G. Peek, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ David G. Peek David G. Peek
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
August 19, 2004 23