alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Christopher Columbus Relief Sculpture

One of four wreathed panels featuring framed portrait busts of early explorers.
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Enrico Causici and Antonio Capellano

Materials
    Sandstone

Year
    1824

Location
      
Above the "Surrender of General Burgoyne" Painting

Capitol Rotunda

Above four of the large Rotunda paintings in the U.S. Capitol are decorative panels of wreaths and portraits of early explorers carved in relief into the sandstone walls. The three sculptors who decorated the Rotunda were employed during the rebuilding of the Capitol after the fire of 1814.

Between the decorative panels of wreaths and portraits, historic scenes, also in relief, circle the Rotunda walls. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


              [Letterhead of Deloitte & Touche LLP Atlanta, Georgia]





November 22, 2005

Goody's Family Clothing, Inc.
Knoxville, Tennessee

We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial information of Goody's Family Clothing, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of and for the periods ended October 29, 2005 and October 30,
2004 as indicated in our report dated November 22, 2005; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 29, 2005, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-32357, 33-51210,
33-68520, 333-00052, 333-09595 and 333-126475 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERALD REYNOLDS, Jr.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

G. STARCEVICH, Dr.; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-15662

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-00326-GEBCMK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2013** 

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Former California state prisoner Gerald Reynolds, Jr., appeals pro se from

the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28

FILED

MAR 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir. 2003). 

We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Reynolds’s action because Reynolds

failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. See Woodford v.

Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 85, 93-95 (2006) (holding that “proper exhaustion” is mandatory

and requires adherence to administrative procedural rules); McKinney v. Carey,

311 F.3d 1198, 1199 (9th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (requiring exhaustion of

administrative remedies prior to filing suit). 

To the extent that Reynolds alleges that defendants violated his

constitutional rights in the processing of his grievance, he fails to state a claim

because Reynolds has no constitutional right to a specific prison grievance

procedure. See Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 860 (9th Cir. 2003).

AFFIRMED.

2 12-15662
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Autocam Corporation (the "Company") for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, as delivered on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Warren A. Veltman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 10, 2005                  /s/ Warren A. Veltman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Warren A. Veltman
                                        Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Brian E. Dearing, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;Dated: March 19, 2007         By: /s/ Brian E. Dearing           By: Brian E. Dearing    Title: Chairman, President and CEO
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING 

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND 

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE. 

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT

USDA, AMS, SCP, SCI 

SCSupplyDepot@usda.gov

 PHONE: 650-552-9073 

FAX: 650-552-9147 

EQUIPMENT CATALOG
SWEETPOTATOES 

FAIRLY WELL SHAPED. U.S. EXTRA NO. 1 AND U.S. NO. 1 

Sweetpotatoes, Photo No. 5 

December 1990 

(Previously No. 5, no date) 
SWEETPOTATOES 

FAIRLY WELL SHAPED. U.S. EXTRA NO. 1 AND U.S. NO. 1 

Sweetpotatoes, Photo No. 6 

December 1990 

(Previously No. 6, no date) 
SWEETPOTATOES 

FAIRLY WELL SHAPED. U.S. EXTRA NO. 1 AND U.S. NO. 1 

Sweetpotatoes, Photo No. 7 

December 1990 

(Previously No. 7, no date) 
SWEETPOTATOES 

NOT FAIRLY WELL SHAPED – U.S. NO. 2 

Sweetpotatoes, Photo No. 8 

December 1990 

(Previously No. 8, no date) 
SWEETPOTATOES 

NOT FAIRLY WELL SHAPED – U.S. NO. 2 

Sweetpotatoes, Photo No. 9 

December 1990 

(Previously No. 9, no date) 
SWEETPOTATOES 

NOT FAIRLY WELL SHAPED – U.S. NO. 2 

Sweetpotatoes, Photo No. 10 

December 1990 

(Previously No. 10, no date) 
SWEETPOTATOES 

NOT FAIRLY WELL SHAPED – U.S. NO. 2 

Sweetpotatoes, Photo No. 11 

December 1990 

(Previously No. 11, no date) 
SWEETPOTATOES 

NOT FAIRLY WELL SHAPED – U.S. NO. 2 

Sweetpotatoes, Photo No. 12 

December 1990 

(Previously No. 12, no date) 
SWEETPOTATOES 

SLIDE NUMBER 228 – CUCUMBER BEETLE INJURY 
SWEETPOTATOES 

SLIDE NUMBER 229 – CUCUMBER BEETLE INJURY 
Internal Breakdown (Pithiness) (C) in Sweetpotatoes 

Tend to be lighter weight, with interior flesh being pithy, spongy, cottony, and/or showing cavities. 

The spongy cottony flesh may also show white to yellow streaking. 

Score any amount as serious damage. 

USDA Sweetpotato CP-1, Dec. 2019
# L_2005064EN.01004701.xml

| 10.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 64/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 64/47

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 125/2004

of 24 September 2004

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 97/2004 of 9 July 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 97/2004 of 9 July 2004 (1).

| (2) | Council Regulation (EC) No 392/2004 of 24 February 2004 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto in agricultural products and foodstuffs (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Council Regulation (EC) No 392/2004 of 24 February 2004 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto in agricultural products and foodstuffs (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 54b (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91) of Chapter XII of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32004 R 0392: Council Regulation (EC) No 392/2004 of 24 February 2004 (OJ L 65, 3.3.2004, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32004 R 0392: Council Regulation (EC) No 392/2004 of 24 February 2004 (OJ L 65, 3.3.2004, p. 1).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 392/2004 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 25 September 2004, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 September 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kjartan JÓHANNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 376, 23.12.2004, p. 19.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 65, 3.3.2004, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### In the Matter of the Estate of William E. Hurd, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

May 19, 1959.

*Isidore Siegal*for petitioner.

*James M. O’Brien*for objectant and cross petitioner.

John D. Bennett, S.

Objections to this petition for letters of administration rely on prior letters issued in this decedent’s estate in Rensselaer County, as evidenced by a certificate signed by the Clerk of the Surrogate’s Court of that county. Since the Surrogate of Rensselaer County has already acquired jurisdiction and since the letters have not been revoked, this court is excluded from the subsequent exercise of jurisdiction in this estate (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 44; *Matter of Maginn,*215 App. Div. 790; *Matter of Humpfner,*146 Misc. 461, affd. 240 App. Div. 745; *Matter of Feinberg,*155 Misc. 844).

The petition is accordingly dismissed.

Settle decree on five days’ notice.
<PAGE>





                                                             Exhibit 11.1

                           WIRELESS TELECOM GROUP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               For the Three Months    For the Nine Months
                                Ended September 30,     Ended September 30,
                                 1997         1996       1997        1996

<S>                           <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>
NET INCOME                    $1,800,747   $2,062,062  $6,182,991  $5,409,477
                               ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------
PRIMARY
Weighted average shares      17,445,935   17,354,571  17,430,489  17,325,159
Assumed conversions:
    Stock options and warrants   383,597      400,059     391,917     390,555
                              ----------   ----------  ----------  ----------
       Total weighted average
         shares outstanding   17,829,532   17,754,630  17,822,406  17,715,714

       Per share amounts            $.10         $.12        $.35        $.31

FULLY DILUTED
Weighted average shares       17,445,935   17,354,571  17,430,489  17,325,159
Assumed conversions:
   Stock options and warrants    383,597      410,255     391,917     402,977
                              ----------   ----------  ----------  ----------
      Total weighted average
        shares outstanding    17,829,532   17,764,826  17,822,406  17,728,136

      Per share amounts             $.10         $.12        $.35        $.31
</TABLE>

                                        -13-
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

**Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act Of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Nexen Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marvin F. Romanow, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
| 1.     |   | The   Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                       |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     |   | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the   Corporation. |

 

 
| By:    | /s/   Marvin F. Romanow                        |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Marvin   F. Romanow                            |   |
|   | President &   Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

February 24, 2011

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                      JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                3,784,705
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         5,817,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                           (486,428)
<INVENTORY>                                             323,087
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     11,431,875
<PP&E>                                                6,373,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (888,949)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       18,999,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 6,909,803
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                              3,826,926
<OTHER-SE>                                            2,848,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         18,999,296
<SALES>                                              25,928,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     25,928,468
<CGS>                                                20,979,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        25,075,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      204,543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         859,237
<INCOME-TAX>                                            389,745
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            469,492
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.16
        

</TABLE>
#### Thomas Browarek, Individually and as Father and Natural Guardian of Michael Browarek, an Infant, Respondent, v Raymond Pfalzer et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. 1.)

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: The negligence, if any, of defendant Raymond Pfalzer in causing his grandfather’s automobile to become stuck in the mud was not the proximate cause of the infant plaintiffs injury. Defendant could not have reasonably foreseen that, in attempting to extricate the car from the mud, the driver of a truck would leave the truck unattended, permitting it to roll down a slope and pin plaintiff against the car *(see, Ventricelli v Kinney Sys. Rent A Car,*45 NY2d 950, *mod,*46 NY2d 770; *Scott v Mead,*132 AD2d 755). Summary judgment, therefore, should be entered in favor of defendants Raymond and Donald Pfalzer. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 2 , 2012
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 11

- 00627

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF T.T .L. , a Juvenile
On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Waller County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JV08

- 17



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On January 13 , 200 9, a ppellant, a juvenile, was adjudicated delinquent on a determinate

- sentence petition alleging the first

- degree felony offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child for which he was sentenced to ten years' confinement in the Texas Youth Commission with possible transfer to the adult system. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03 (West 2011); Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §§ 51.03, 53.045(a) ( West Supp. 2012 ). Subsequently, the State requested the trial court to cond uct a hearing for the purpose of considering the transfer of a ppellant from the custody of the Texas Youth Commission to the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

– Institutional Division (TDCJ

– ID) for the remainder of his sentence. See Tex. Fa m. Code Ann. § 54.11 (West Supp.2

20 12 ). T he trial court ordered appellant transferred to TDCJ

– ID for the remainder of his
sentence. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 54.11(k) ( West Supp. 2012 ). Appellant appeals the trial court's order transferring his custody t o TDCJ

– ID. We affirm. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might arguably support the appeal. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App.1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.C rim.App.1969); see also In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 298 (Tex.1998) (Texas Supreme Court held that the Anders procedure applies to juvenile appeals and noted that, although juvenile

- delinquency proceedings are classified as civil, their nature is quasi

criminal). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. (Tex. Crim. App.1991). As of this dat e, no pro se response has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Pa nel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.
EXHIBIT 12.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael J. Smith, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Scully Royalty Ltd.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 15, 2020





|By:                            | /s/ Michael J. Smith | 
|------------------------------ | -------------------- | 
|Michael J. Smith               |                     
|Title: Chief Executive Officer |