alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 54
          - [WC Docket Nos. 10-90, 14-58, 09-197, and 16-271; RM-11868; Report No. 3203; FR ID 183017]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Petition for Reconsideration.

# SUMMARY:

Petitions for Reconsideration (Petitions) have been filed in the Commission's proceeding Connect America Fund: A National Broadband Plan for Our Future High-Cost Universal Service Support, ETC Annual Reports and Certifications, Telecommunications Carriers Eligible to Receive Universal Service Support, Connect America Fund—Alaska Plan, and Expanding Broadband Service Through the ACAM Program.

# DATES:

Oppositions to the Petitions must be filed on or before December 12, 2023. Replies to oppositions must be filed on or before December 22, 2023.

# ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For additional information on this proceeding, contact Stephen Wang of the Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, at (202) 418-7400 or                         *Stephen.Wang@fcc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a summary of the Commission's document, Report No. 3203, released October 31, 2023. The full text of the Petitions can be accessed online via the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System at:                     *http://apps.fcc.gov/​ecfs/​.*                     The Commission will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because no rules are being adopted by the Commission.                

*Subject:*                     Connect America Fund: A National Broadband Plan for Our Future High-Cost Universal Service Support (WC Docket Nos. 10-90, 14-58, 09-197, and 16-271; RM-11868).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     5.                

Federal Communications Commission.

Marlene Dortch,

Secretary, Office of the Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-25858 Filed 11-24-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
The Hono rable Richard H. Battey, Chief United States District Judge for th e 1 District of South Dakota. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2894

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Royce Gay, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 18, 1997 Filed: March 18, 1998

___________ Before BEAM, HEANEY, and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Royc e Gay appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to suppres s 1 evidence discovered in a

search of his residence and admitted against him at trial on a charge of marijuana possession with intent to distribute. Having carefully reviewed the recor dand the parties' briefs, we conclude that the district court did not err . Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. ATTEST: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 4 AND 5 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 27, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-27-1997
<CASH>                                       2,468,147
<SECURITIES>                                     6,813
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,554
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,836,916
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,508,232
<PP&E>                                       3,136,262
<DEPRECIATION>                               (951,077)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,937,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,614,938
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,524
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,165,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,937,832
<SALES>                                      2,796,359
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,796,359
<CGS>                                          793,921
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,020,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,524
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              90,678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (99,216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (99,216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (99,216)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000879235
<NAME> AUTOCAM CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,953,934
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,376,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,262,375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,437,198
<PP&E>                                      54,886,583
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,168,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,096,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,231,635
<BONDS>                                     11,714,035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    23,185,548
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,542,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,096,493
<SALES>                                     14,647,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,647,819
<CGS>                                       11,317,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,317,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             326,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,155,934
<INCOME-TAX>                                   752,139
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,403,795
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,403,795
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1553 

To provide for cost-of-living increases for certain Federal benefits programs 

based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for the elderly. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2019 

Mr. GARAMENDI (for himself, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. KHANNA, Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ, Mr. MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. 

MOULTON, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. YARMUTH, Mr. POCAN, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, Ms. PINGREE, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. DEUTCH, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. SABLAN, Mr. MCNERNEY, and Ms. WILD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

and in addition to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs, Oversight and 

Reform, and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for cost-of-living increases for certain Federal 

benefits programs based on increases in the Consumer 

Price Index for the elderly. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair COLA for Seniors 

5 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1553 IH

1 SEC. 2. COST-OF-LIVING INCREASES FOR CERTAIN FED2 ERAL BENEFITS PROGRAMS BASED ON IN3 CREASES IN THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX 

4 FOR THE ELDERLY. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, whenever 

6 there is an increase in the Consumer Price Index for the 

7 elderly, published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the 

8 dollar amounts in effect for the payment of the following 

9 benefits, as such amounts were in effect immediately be10 fore the increase in the Consumer Price Index for the el11 derly, shall be increased by the same percentage as such 

12 price index was increased: 

13 (1) An annuity under the Civil Service Retire14 ment System or the Federal Employees Retirement 

15 System. 

16 (2) Department of Veterans Affairs wartime 

17 disability compensation under section 1114 of title 

18 38, United States Code. 

19 (3) Department of Veterans Affairs additional 

20 compensation for dependents under section 1115(1) 

21 of such title. 

22 (4) The Department of Veterans Affairs cloth23 ing allowance under section 1162 of such title. 

24 (5) Department of Veterans Affairs dependency 

25 and indemnity compensation to surviving spouse 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1553 IH

1 under subsections (a) through (d) of section 1311 of 

2 such title. 

3 (6) Department of Veterans Affairs dependency 

4 and indemnity compensation to children under sec5 tions 1313(a) and 1314 of such title. 

6 (7) Military retirement and survivor benefit 

7 programs, as defined in section 1461(b) of title 10, 

8 United States Code. 

9 (8) Any old-age, survivors, or disability insur10 ance benefit under title II of the Social Security Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection
with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2020 (the “Report”), I, L’Sheryl D. Hudson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Dated: August 13, 2020





|EQUUS TOTAL RETURN, INC.   
|---------------------------
|                           
|/s/
    L’Sheryl D. Hudson 
|L’Sheryl
    D. Hudson     
|Chief
    Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 19, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

REVISED JANUARY 24, 2006

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50114

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 PlaintiffAppellee,

versus

ALONZO SUAREZ-OLAYO,

 DefendantAppellant.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-76

-------------------------------------------------------------

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alonzo Suarez-Olayo (“Suarez”) pleaded guiltyto possessionwith intent to distribute at least

500 grams or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(ii). Suarez was

sentenced to 60 months of imprisonment and a five-year term of supervised release. Suarez timely

appealed his conviction, challenging only the district court’s denial of his suppression motion.
 

 

-2-

Suarez argues that Agent Tucker Cowles of the Drug Enforcement Agency did not have

articulable reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle Suarez was driving. Agent Cowles received a

non-specific tip that there was drug activity at a certain motel in the Austin, Texas, area. Agent

Cowles went to the motel and observed Suarez enter the motel parking lot. The motel’s room doors

opened directly onto the parking lot, a feature that, in Agent Cowles’s experience, drug dealers find

advantageous. Suarez made a cellular telephone call while in the parking lot, he left the parking lot,

and he returned with two companions. Suarez and the two other men parked and entered one of the

motelrooms. Suarez was empty-handed upon entering the hotel room. Several minutes later, Suarez

exited the motel room carrying a plastic grocery bag that he concealed behind the seat of his truck.

Suarez then left the parking lot. In addition to these facts, Agent Cowles stated that a check of the

license plate on Suarez’s vehicle returned no response from the state’s computer database. 

“Reasonable suspicion must be supported by particular and articulable facts, which, taken

together with rational inferencesfromthose facts, reasonablywarrant an intrusion.” Goodson v. City

of Corpus Christi, 202 F.3d 730, 736 (5th Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks and citations

omitted). The facts stated by Agent Cowles, and credited by the district court, are specific and were

articulated in clear terms. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, the

district court did not err in concluding that all of the specific facts considered together supported the

stop. See id.; United States v. Foy, 28 F.3d 464, 474 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,757,000
<SECURITIES>                                17,721,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  233,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,375,000
<PP&E>                                       2,289,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,480,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,238,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,904,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   117,630,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (94,344,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,286,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,231,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,881,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016203EN.01004701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/47

---

Article 193

Member States undertake not to submit a dispute concerning the interpretation or application of this Treaty to any method of settlement other than those provided for therein.

---
# C_2016202EN.01013001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/130 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/130

---

Article 183

(ex Article 167 TEC)

(ex Article 167 TEC)

For the implementation of the multiannual framework programme the Union shall:

| — | determine the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities, |
| --- | --- |

—

determine the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities,

| — | lay down the rules governing the dissemination of research results. |
| --- | --- |

—

lay down the rules governing the dissemination of research results.

---
26665

#### Waddell v. Government Employees Ins. Co.

Affirmed
JARED DUANE SLAY, RN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0089

Opinion filed April 15, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Department of Health.

Michael R. D'Lugo of Wicker, Smith, O'hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for 

Petitioner.

Therese A. Savona, Chief Appellate Counsel, Florida Department of Health, for 

Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant petitions for review of a non-final administrative order which 

imposed emergency restrictions on his nursing license. Section 120.60(6), Florida 
Statutes, permits an emergency restriction of a license so long as “[t]he agency

takes only that action necessary to protect the public interest under the emergency 

procedure” and states in writing the “specific facts and reasons for finding an 

immediate danger to the public health.” We find that the order recited sufficient 

facts and reasons to support the emergency restriction and the restrictions were 

narrowly tailored as required to fairly address the public safety pending the formal 

administrative action. See Nath v. State Dep’t of Health, 100 So. 3d 1273, 1276 

(Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Burton v. State Dep’t of Health, 116 So. 3d 1285, 1286-87 

(Fla. 1st DCA 2013). 

Therefore, the petition is DENIED.

ROBERTS, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.

2
Exhibit
13.1

CERTIFICATION
OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
annual report of MFC Industrial Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Michael Smith, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  |  | the Annual Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                     
| | ---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |  |                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (ii) |  | the information
      contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
  Company.

Date:                    March
31, 2014

|/s/ Michael Smith                    | 
|------------------------------------ | 
|By: Michael
      Smith             
|Title: Chief
      Executive Officer

This certification
accompanies this Annual Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.

---
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-69516 and 333-124597on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-61035, 33-39837,333-87288, and 333-88419 on Form S-8 of our reportsdated December 6, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statementsand financial statement schedule of Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingappearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cascade Natural GasCorporation for the year ended September 30, 2006.
| /s/ DELOITTE  & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Seattle, Washington            |
| December 7, 2006          |

 

----