alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134858 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134858 

 COA: 279097 

Chippewa CC: 05-007986-FH

DALE LESTER MORRIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 9, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
# New Jersey_county_differentials
# C_2016202EN.01007401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/74

---

Article 69

National Parliaments ensure that the proposals and legislative initiatives submitted under Chapters 4 and 5 comply with the principle of subsidiarity, in accordance with the arrangements laid down by the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                             SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE

                       TO INDENTURE DATED AUGUST 15, 1997

         THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE dated as of November 12, 2001, is delivered
pursuant to Section 4.11 of the Indenture dated as of August 15, 1997 (as
heretofore or hereafter modified and supplemented and in effect from time to
time, the "1997 Indenture") among OUTDOOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware
corporation, certain of its subsidiaries (the "Guarantors") and FIRST UNION
NATIONAL BANK, a national banking corporation, as Trustee (the "Trustee") (all
terms used herein without definition having the meanings ascribed to them in the
1997 Indenture).

         The undersigned hereby agrees that:

         1. The undersigned is a Guarantor under the 1997 Indenture with all of
the rights and obligations of the Guarantors thereunder.

         2. The undersigned has granted, ratified and confirmed, in the form and
substance of Exhibit B to the 1997 Indenture, the Guarantee provided for by
Article XI of the 1997 Indenture.

         3. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the
representations and warranties set forth in the 1997 Indenture, to the extent
relating to the undersigned as Guarantor, are correct on and as of the date
hereof.

         4. All notices, requests and other communications provided for in the
1997 Indenture should be delivered to the undersigned at the following address:

                  Keith A. Istre
                  Vice President - Finance and
                  Chief Financial Officer
                  Lamar Media Corp. and its Subsidiaries
                  5551 Corporate Blvd.
                  Baton Rouge, LA 70808

         5. A counterpart of this Supplemental Indenture may be attached to any
counterpart of the 1997 Indenture.

         6. This Supplemental Indenture shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York.



<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Supplemental
Indenture to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

                                        Guarantor:

                                        Trans West Outdoor Advertising, Inc.,
                                        a California corporation



                                        By: /s/ Keith A. Istre
                                           -------------------------------------
                                            Keith A. Istre
                                            Vice President - Finance and Chief
                                            Financial Officer

Attest:

By:  /s/ James R. McIlwain
   -------------------------------------
   James R. McIlwain, Secretary

Accepted:

FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, as Trustee

By:  /s/ James Long
   -------------------------------------
Title:  Assistant Vice President
      ----------------------------------





                                       2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of MasTec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A (the Report), I, Jose R. Mas, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                    |  |                                                 
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 22, 2012 |  | /s/ Jose R. Mas                                 
|                    |  | Name: Jose R. Mas Title: Chief
Executive Officer

The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.
#### KENNETH T. HENTON *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 19870)

Foti, Landau and Dupont, Js.

Argued June 1

officially released June 27, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Gonzalez v. Cambra

23680

01/30/2003

Affirmed
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 26, 2018

No. 04-18-00414-CR

John Bryan FINCH,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-07-0222-CRA

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due on August 6, 2018. On August 9, 2018, the clerk 

of this court notified the court reporter, Staci Slayden, that she is the court reporter responsible 

for timely filing the reporter’s record in this appeal and that the reporter’s record is late. The 

clerk explained that if the reporter’s record has not been filed because (1) the appellant has failed 

to pay or make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee and (2) the appellant is not entitled to 

appeal without paying the fee, the court reporter must file a notification of late record stating 

such fact within ten days. Otherwise, the court reporter must file the reporter’s record within 

thirty days. The court reporter did not timely file a notification of late record, nor has she filed 

the reporter’s record. We, therefore, ORDER court reporter Staci Slayden to file the reporter’s 

record no later than October 26, 2018. If the reporter’s record is not received by such date, an 

order may be issued directing Staci Slayden to appear and show cause why she should not be 

held in contempt for failing to file the record.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of September, 2018.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Angela  (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 16, 2021 - 9:22amThank you, AOC team! You are appreciated. You are important and needed. You do a great job. I hope your superiors notice it too and reward you.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
28479

#### State v. Murphy

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------


THIS REPORT IS A COPY OF THE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED REPORT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
WHICH HAS NOT BEEN REISSUED BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Chattem, Inc.

We have audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States, the consolidated financial statements included in Chattem, Inc.
and subsidiaries' annual report to shareholders incorporated by reference in
this Form 10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated January 23, 2002. Our
audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on those statements taken
as a whole. Schedule II is the responsibility of the Company's management and is
presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This
schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all
material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Chattanooga, Tennessee
January 23, 2002
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 916 

To require the purchase of domestically made flags of the United States 

of America for use by the Federal Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mrs. BUSTOS (for herself, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. MENG, Mr. KING

of New York, Mr. JONES, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. MURPHY of 

Florida, Ms. EDWARDS, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Ms. ESTY, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. DELANEY, 

Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. PETERS, Mr. BUCSHON, 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. CARNEY, Mr. VALADAO, 

Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. AMODEI, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. RENACCI, 

Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. JOYCE, Mr. KILMER, Ms. FRANKEL of 

Florida, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. GALLEGO, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Ms. 

SINEMA, Miss RICE of New York, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. 

BRADY of Pennsylvania, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. HAHN, Ms. 

KUSTER, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. HECK of Washington, Mrs. WALORSKI, Mr. 

SIRES, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Mr. CLAY, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. RICE of South Carolina, Mrs. ELLMERS, Mr. 

YOHO, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. MEEKS, Mrs. BEATTY, Ms. NORTON, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. BEN RAY LUJA ́N of New Mexico, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. RUSH, Mr. 

BUTTERFIELD, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. VELA, Mr. 

QUIGLEY, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ, Mr. LANGEVIN, Ms. 

BROWNLEY of California, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. 

LARSON of Connecticut, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. 

KATKO, Mr. GUINTA, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. GRAYSON, Mr. BERA, Mr. 

LYNCH, Ms. CHU of California, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Ms. PINGREE, and Mr. 

LOEBSACK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 916 IH

A BILL 

To require the purchase of domestically made flags of the 

United States of America for use by the Federal Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘All-American Flag 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR PURCHASE OF DOMESTICALLY 

7 MADE UNITED STATES FLAGS FOR USE BY 

8 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. 

9 Only such flags of the United States of America, re10 gardless of size, that are 100 percent manufactured in the 

11 United States, from articles, materials, or supplies 100 

12 percent of which are grown, produced, or manufactured 

13 in the United States, may be acquired for use by the Fed14 eral Government. 

15 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

16 Section 2 shall apply to purchases of flags made on 

17 or after 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

18 Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1400 Independence Avenue, SW 

 Room 2530-S, STOP 0225

 Washington, D.C. 20250-0225

July 24, 2023

Mr. Thomas Olson

Dairy Pricing Association, Inc.

W15311 Franklin Road

Taylor, Wisconsin 54659

Dear Mr. Olson:

This letter is in reply to the Dairy Pricing Association’s proposal submitted in response to a 

Request for Additional Proposals relating to the pricing provisions of the Federal milk marketing 

order (FMMO) program. USDA received the Dairy Pricing Association’s proposal on June 14, 

2023, seeking to amend the regulations to adopt a nationwide supply management program.

The Secretary has determined the hearing will be limited in scope to amendments directly 

impacting the uniform pricing formulas of all FMMOs. USDA received several proposals that 

did not relate directly to the uniform FMMO pricing formulas and are beyond the scope of the 

upcoming rulemaking. 

Regarding the proposal submitted by the Dairy Pricing Association specifically, the legislation 

authorizing FMMOs, the Agriculture Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (AMAA) (7 U.S.C. 

608c(5)), does not grant USDA the authority to adopt a nationwide supply management program. 

As such, the Dairy Pricing Association’s proposal is denied.

A Hearing Notice has been published in the Federal Register announcing a hearing will convene 

at 9:00 a.m. ET on Wednesday, August 23, 2023, at 502 East Event Centre in Carmel, Indiana. 

We encourage the Dairy Pricing Association to participate in the hearing. Please refer to the 

Hearing website (www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/dairy/hearings/national-fmmopricing-hearing) for full information on how to participate. 

Thank you for your interest in the FMMO program.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dana H. Coale

Deputy Administrator

USDA-AMS-Dairy Program
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0233

_________________ IN THE MARRIAGE OF: JASON C. MILLER,

Petitioner and Appellee, v. ERIN O. MILLER,

Respondent and Appellant, and CHRISTIAN F. MILLER,

Intervenor and Appellee. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a c opy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Leslie Halligan , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 6 2022

04/06/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0233
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
William Penn's Treaty with the Indians, 1682, Relief Sculpture

One of four relief panels featuring scenes from American colonial history.
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Nicholas Gevelot

Materials
    Sandstone

Year
    1827

Location
      
Above the North Door

Capitol Rotunda

Above each of the four Rotunda doors in the U.S. Capitol are scenes from the history of the American Colonies carved in relief into the sandstone walls. The three sculptors who decorated the Rotunda were employed during the rebuilding of the Capitol after the fire of 1814.

Between the historic scenes, decorative panels of wreaths and portraits, also in relief, circle the Rotunda walls. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the Fund) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report), I, Kenneth I. Denos, Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Kenneth I. Denos   
|                         |  |  |  | Kenneth I. Denos       
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00251-CV

KYLE TRAMMELL

v.

KYLIE TRAMMELL

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law of Aransas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. A-21-7045-FL

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 30, 2022
# C_2012326EN.01020101.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

PROTOCOL (No 25)

ON THE EXERCISE OF SHARED COMPETENCE

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Sole Article

With reference to Article 2(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on shared competence, when the Union has taken action in a certain area, the scope of this exercise of competence only covers those elements governed by the Union act in question and therefore does not cover the whole area.

---
The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1

the Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

Nos. 96-3688/3734

___________

Lawrence Ginter; Alice E. Ginter, *

*

Appellants/Cross-Appellees, *

*

v. *

*

Terry E. Branstad, as Governor of IA; * Appeals from the United States

Darrel Rensink, Director, IA DOT; * District Court for the

Robert L. North, "Right of Way" * Southern District of Iowa

Director, IA DOT; Steven B. *

Westvold, Beautification Admin., IA * [UNPUBLISHED]

DOT, *

*

Appellees/Cross-Appellants. *

___________

 Submitted: June 25, 1997

 Filed: July 10, 1997

___________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence and Alice Ginter appeal from the final order of the United States

District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, granting summary judgment to 1
-2-

defendants on the ground that this First Amendment action is moot, and granting them

less attorneys fees than they requested. Defendants cross-appeal the award of attorneys

fees. We have carefully reviewed the entire record, and we affirm on the basis of the

district court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2016202EN.01040301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/403 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/403

---

Article 46

Diplomatic and consular protection

Every citizen of the Union shall, in the territory of a third country in which the Member State of which he or she is a national is not represented, be entitled to protection by the diplomatic or consular authorities of any Member State, on the same conditions as the nationals of that Member State.

---