alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January 8, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOSSUE DANIEL GARCIA

- LOPEZ , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00500

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 31.1



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Bruce A. Williamson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Dynegy Inc. (Dynegy);



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Dynegy as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;



4. Dynegys other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Dynegy and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Dynegy, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of Dynegys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in Dynegys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
period covered by this quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Dynegys internal control over financial reporting; and



5. Dynegys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to Dynegys auditors and the audit committee of Dynegys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Dynegys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Dynegys
internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                                 
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: January 19, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    BRUCE A.
WILLIAMSON                                                      
|                       |  |     |  | Bruce A. Williamson President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT LYR ALISA LAVENA STEVENS, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. VIM AL SINGH; e t a l ., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-16953 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-00239-GEB KJN M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Garland E. B urre ll, Jr., Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 21, 2015 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, GOULD, a n d N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. Ly ra lisa Lave na

Ste ve ns, a

C a lifornia

sta te prisone r, a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt dismissing her 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging viola tions of theEighth Ame ndm e nt, theC a lifornia c onstitution, a

nd C a l ifornia la w ba se d on prison offic ia ls’ fa ilure to a pprove Ste ve ns’ s re que st for se x

# FIL ED FEB 2 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re a s signm e nt surge ry . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w

de novo, Mpoy o v . Litton Ele c tro-Optic a l Sy s. , 430 F.3d 985, 987 (9th C ir. 2005), and we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d the a c t ion a s ba rre d by the doc trine of re s judic ata

be c a use the pa rtie s or the ir privie s a lre a dy litiga te d Ste ve ns’ s c la im s in C a lifornia sta te c ourt. Se eGonzale

s v . C al. De p ’t of C orr. , 739 F.3d 1226, 1231 (9th C ir. 2014) (re a sone d de nia ls of C a lifornia

ha be a s pe titions ha

ve c la im pre c lusivee ffe c t); K

ay v . C ity of Ranc ho Palos Verde

s , 504 F.3d 803, 808 (9th C ir. 2007) (se tting forth e le m e nts of re s judic ata unde r C a lifornia

la w ). W e re je c t a s unpe rsua sive Ste ve ns’ s c o nte ntion tha t she is e ntitle d to c om pe nsation unde r various sta te re gula tions, a nd he r c onte ntion tha

t the distric t c ourt’ s rulings e sta

blishe d tha

t he r c la i m s we re m e ritorious. W e do not c onside r m atte rs not spe c ific a lly an d distinc tly

ra i se d a nd a rgue d in the ope ning brie f, or a

rgum e nts a

n d a lle g ations ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se ePadge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). De fe nda nts’ m o tion to strike

portions of the re ply

brie f, file d on April 11, 2014, is gra

nte d. Se e K

irshne r v . Unide n C

orp. of Am. , 842 F.2d 1074, 1077 (9th C ir. 1988). All othe

r pe nding m otions a

nd re que sts a

re de nie d. AFFIRM E D. 1 3 - 1 6 9 5 3 2
EXHIBIT 31.1IEA Income Fund XII, L.P.Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income Fund XII, L.P. (the“Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 11, 2006     /s/ DENNIS J TIETZ Dennis J Tietz  President of CCC
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

301 Fannin, Room 245

Houston, Texas 77002

To: Chris Daniel December 21, 2015

County: Harris (Criminal)

Subject: RETURN OF ORIGINAL EXHIBITS

Please acknowledge the receipt of the original exhibits listed below. Please sign and return 

the original to this court.

14-15-00988-CR Jose Aldape v The State of Texas 1361921

State’s Exhibit 33, a DVD

Received by: ________________________________________

Received on: ________________________________________
cc: Courtney Langston Lowe 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1198 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 404 South Boulder Highway in Henderson, 

Nevada, as the ‘‘Henderson Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1198 EH

1 SECTION 1. HENDERSON VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 404 South Boulder Highway in 

5 Henderson, Nevada, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Henderson Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Henderson Veterans 

11 Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1198 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Posterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. in Henderson, Nevada, as the ‘‘Henderson Vet- al Service located at 404 South Boulder Highway
**Exhibit 32.1**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of infoUSA Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, (i) the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 9, 2004 */s/ Vinod Gupta* Vinod Gupta,  Chief Executive Officer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Florence R. Sabin Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Joy Buba

Materials
    Bronze

Year
    1959

Location
      
Hall of Columns

This statue of Florence Sabin was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Colorado in 1959.

A pioneer in science and public health, Florence Sabin was born in Central City, Colorado, on November 9, 1871. She graduated from Smith College in 1893, attended the Johns Hopkins Medical School, and was the first woman to graduate from that institution. In 1902 she began to teach anatomy at Johns Hopkins. Appointed professor of histology in 1917, she was the first woman to become a full professor at a medical college. In 1924 Sabin was elected the first woman president of the American Association of Anatomists and the first lifetime woman member of the National Academy of Science.

In September 1925 she became head of the Department of Cellular Studies at the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York City. Her research focused on the lymphatic system, blood vessels and cells, and tuberculosis. In 1944 she came out of a six-year retirement to accept Colorado Governor John Vivian's request to chair a subcommittee on health. This resulted in the "Sabin Health Laws," which modernized the state's public health system. In 1948 she became manager of health and charities for Denver, donating her salary to medical research. She retired again in 1951 and died on October 3, 1953. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Doe; In re (DOB 4/6/87)

16321

8/23/95

Affirmed
1

From: Szabo, Aaron [mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov]  

Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 5:53 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan

Cc: Laity, Jim; Frey, Nathan J.

Subject: EO 12866 and 13563 Interagency Comments: EPA's SSM Guidance and SIP call Final Rule (RIN 2060‐AR68)  

Megan,

Please see attached for the interagency comments on EPA’s Final Rule entitled, “State Implementation Plans: Response

to Petition for Rulemaking; Restatement and Update of EPA’s SSM Policy Applicable to SIPs; Findings of Substantial

Inadequacy; and SIP Calls to Amend Provisions Applying to Excess Emissions During Periods of Startup, Shutdown and

Malfunction” (RIN 2060‐AR68).   

Please let me know if you have any comments or questions.

Aaron L. Szabo

Policy Analyst

Office of Management and Budget

202‐395‐3621

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF BRADLEY REAL ESTATE, INC.


Bradley Real Estate Management, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation

Bradley Midwest Management, Inc., a Minnesota corporation

Bradley Operating Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

Bradley Financing Corp., a Delaware corporation

Bradley Financing Partnership, a Delaware partnership

Bradley Management Corp., a Delaware corporation

Bradley Management Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

Bradley Spring Mall, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Bradley Spring Mall Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

BTR Development Corp., a Delaware corporation

BTR Development Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

Williamson Square Associates Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 March 27, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-12162

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00153-CV-4-SPM/AK

PIONEER MILITARY LENDING OF GEORGIA, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus 

BILL MCCOLLUM, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(March 27, 2007)

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, BIRCH and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Pioneer Military Lending of Georgia (“PMLG”) appeals the district court’s

denial of its motion for a preliminary injunction. Before the district court, PMLG
2

sought to enjoin the state of Florida from investigating its lending practices and

subpoenaing its documents on the grounds that such regulatory activity violated the

Commerce Clause. PMLG argued that since its loans were limited to non-residents

of Florida, the state’s interest in regulating PMLG loans was insufficient to justify

the burden on PMLG’s unique lending practices. Finding that PMLG had failed to

demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, the district court

denied their motion.

The grant or denial of a preliminary injunction is a decision within the

discretion of the district court. Carillon Importers, Ltd. v. Frank Pesce Intern.

Group, Ltd., 112 F.3d 1125, 1126 (11th Cir. 1997) (per curiam). Our review of

this decision is extremely narrow in scope and we will reverse only if there is a

clear abuse of discretion. Id. Furthermore, we pay no attention to the merits of the

controversy beyond that necessary to determine the presence or absence of such an

abuse of discretion. Id. We find that PMLG has failed to demonstrate that reversal

is warranted under this extremely deferential standard of review. Accordingly, we

affirm the decision below.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT (24) 18
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned,  as President of West Texas Utilities  Company (the "Company"),
hereby  makes,  constitutes  and appoints R.  Russell  Davis his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power and authority to execute in the name
and on behalf  of the  undersigned,  in any and all  capacities,  the  Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1998 and any and all  amendments  thereto,  to be
filed under the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as  amended,  and any other
documents and  instruments  incidental  thereto,  and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities
and Exchange Commission,  hereby granting to such  attorney-in-fact,  and agent,
full power and authority of substitution and revocation in the premises and full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary  to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully for all  intents and
purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person and hereby ratifying and
confirming all that such  attorney-in-fact and agent, may do or cause to be done
by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have hereunto  executed this Power of Attorney this 26th
day of January, 1999.


                                       /s/ Paul J. Brower
                                           Paul J. Brower
                                           General Manager/President and
                                           Director


Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26th day of January, 1999 by Paul J. 
Brower.


                                       /s/ Martha Murray
                                           Notary Public

My Commission Expires:     11-19-2000
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Cagle’s, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended April 2, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/   Mark M. Ham IV                                   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Mark   M. Ham IV                                       |   |
| Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| (Principal   Accounting Officer)                       |   |
| Date:  June 8, 2011                          |   |

 

----
#### The UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, Inc., Helen Mara and Charles Chaplin, Appellants.

No. 135.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Oct. 30, 1939.

*1023Epstein *&*Goodman, of New York City (Harry Goodman, and Arthur S. Bruckman, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

John T. Cahill, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Jesse Moss, of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.