alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.6**

 

**CEO AND CFO SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

January 31, 2018

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

Luc Jobin, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Ghislain Houle, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, of Canadian National Railway Company, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.                      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Canadian National Railway Company.

 

 
| /s/   Luc Jobin                       |   | /s/   Ghislain Houle         |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
| Luc Jobin                             |   | Ghislain Houle               |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive Vice-President and |
|                                  |   | Chief Financial Officer      |

 

----
August 5, 2008

28766

#### State v. Matsuda

Affirmed
11-i 

CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

11.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 11-1

11.2 GENERAL APPROACH.................................................................................................. 11-1
11-1 

CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS 

11.1 INTRODUCTION 

The life-cycle cost (LCC) subgroup analysis evaluates impacts of standards on 

identifiable groups, such as different consumer populations or business types that may be 

disproportionately affected by any national energy conservation standard level. In the notice of 

proposed rulemaking (NOPR), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will analyze the LCCs and 

payback periods (PBPs) for consumers that fall into such groups. The analysis will determine 

whether any particular group of consumers would be adversely affected by any of the trial 

standard levels (TSLs) proposed in the NOPR.

11.2 GENERAL APPROACH 

For general service fluorescent lamps (GSFLs), DOE estimates LCC savings and PBPs 

for consumers in the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. For incandescent reflector 

lamps (IRLs), DOE estimates LCC savings and PBPs for consumers in the residential and 

commercial sectors. Ballasts will not be regulated under this rulemaking, but are considered in 

the energy use analysis (chapter 6 of this preliminary technical support document [TSD]) to 

determine energy consumption of GSFL systems.

DOE analyzes the impact of a standard on LCC for consumers faced with a variety of 

different lamp or lamp-and-ballast purchasing events. The LCC impacts are different for a 

consumer who must replace a lamp in an existing system versus purchase a lamp or lamp-andballast system for new building construction. 

In the LCC subgroup analysis, DOE will examine consumer sub-populations. Using the 

LCC spreadsheet model, DOE plans to examine variations in LCC inputs (operating hours, 

energy prices, etc.) that might affect the LCC savings and PBPs for different consumer subpopulations. This analysis will determine whether any particular group of consumers would be 

adversely affected by any of the TSLs.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Browserweb Media Agency, Mark Burke v. Maxus Energy 

Corporation

Appellate case number: 01-14-01028-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-63727

Trial court: 11th District Court of Harris County

Appellee Maxus Energy Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss filed April 14, 2015 is 

DENIED. 

Appellant filed a response to the Motion to Dismiss on April 15, 2015 in which he 

requests an additional 30 days to file his brief. The motion is GRANTED, with no further 

extensions. Appellant’s brief is due May 8, 2015.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 16, 2015
ASSIGNMENT 

NAME OF AGENCY: __________________________________________________________________ 

Does hereby assign, transfer, and set over to Commodity Credit Corporation, an Agency and instrumentality of the 

United States of America, within the United States Department of Agriculture, all of its rights, title, and interest in 

and to any claims arising from the following shipment(s): 

NAME OF VESSEL: __________________________________________________________________ 

NAME OF CARRIER: _________________________________________________________________ 

CONTRACTED 

ONBOARD BILL OF LADING CONTRACT COMMODITIES DISCHARGE/DELIVERY 

B/L DATE NUMBER NUMBER SHIPPED PORT 

SIGNED BY:______________________________________________ DATE:_________________
# EUR-Lex - 21994A0103(31) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 21994A0103(31)

**Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 30 on specific provisions on the organization of cooperation in the field of statistics **

*
Official Journal L 001 , 03/01/1994 P. 0197 - 0197 *

PROTOCOL 30

on specific provisions on the organization of cooperation in the field of statistics

1. A conference of representatives of national statistical organizations of the Contracting Parties, the Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat) and the Office of the Statistical Adviser of the EFTA States (OSA EFTA) shall be created. The conference shall guide statistical cooperation, develop programmes and procedures for statistical cooperation in close coordination with those of the Community and monitor their implementation.

2. The EFTA States shall, from the entry into force of the Agreement, participate within the framework of plans for priority actions in the field of statistical information.(1)

The EFTA States shall contribute financially to such actions in accordance with Article 82(1)(a) of the Agreement and the Financial Regulations thereto.

The EFTA States shall participate fully in the EC committees which assist the EC Commission in the management or development of such actions in so far as the subjects dealt with are covered by the Agreement.

3. Statistical information from EFTA States relating to matters covered by the Agreement shall be coordinated by the OSA EFTA and transmitted through it to Eurostat. Storage and processing of data shall take place within Eurostat.

4. Eurostat and the OSA EFTA shall ensure that EEA statistics are disseminated to the various users and to the public.

5. The EFTA States shall defray the additional costs incurred by Eurostat for storing, processing and disseminating data from their countries according to the provisions of the Agreement. The amounts involved shall be fixed periodically by the EEA Joint Committee.

6. Confidential statistical data may be used only for statistical purposes.

(1) i.e. future plans of the kind established by 389 Y 0628 (01) Council Resolution of 19 June 1989 on the implementation of a plan for priority actions in the field of statistical information: Statistical programme of the European Communities 1989 to 1992 (OJ No C 161, 28.6.1989, p. 1).
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42464

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

THOMAS BENJAMIN LAIRD,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 469A

Filed: April 21, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

AMENDED OPINION

THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION 

DATED APRIL 17, 2015

IS HEREBY AMENDED

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of ten years with three 

years determinate for burglary and grand theft, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM 

Thomas Benjamin Laird was convicted of burglary, Idaho Code § 18-1401, and grand 

theft, I.C. §§ 18-2403(1), 18-2407(1)(b), and 18-2409. The district court imposed concurrent 

unified sentences of ten years with three years determinate. Laird appeals, contending that his

sentences are excessive.
2

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Laird’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice; cancellation of briefing; panel III.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Commission on Civil Rights published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         concerning the panel III briefing of the Arizona Advisory Committee on Monday, November 27, 2023 at 1:00 p.m. mountain standard time. The notice is in the                         **Federal Register**                         of Monday, October 30, 2023 in                               ( print page 83077)    FR Doc. 2023-23891, in the third column of page 74145 and the first column of page 74146.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kayla Fajota at                         *kfajota@usccr.gov*                         or (434) 515-2395.                    

Dated: November 22, 2023.

David Mussatt,

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.

[FR Doc. 2023-26194 Filed 11-27-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# Product List
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00237-CR

Phillip Wayne GRIFFIS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 7th Judicial District Court, Smith County, Texas

Trial Court No. 007-1767-08

The Honorable Kerry L. Russell, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

affirmed. 

SIGNED April 30, 2014.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
#### Vincent Tomasino, Respondent, v William Morrow & Company, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

—In an action to recover damages for libel and for a violation of Civil Rights Law § 51, the defendants William Morrow & Company, Inc., and St. Martin’s Press Incorporated, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated January 12, 1990, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The plaintiff commenced this action against the publishers of both the hardcover and paperback editions of the novel, *Ride A Tiger,*alleging that the book falsely and wrongfully portrayed him as, among other things, an organized crime boss, a labor union racketeer, a gambler and a murderer. Additionally, he claimed that the defendants used his name and description in the State of New York for the purposes of trade, without either his written or oral consent.

Under the "single publication rule” applicable to allegedly libelous works, both causes of action accrued at the time of their original publication *(see, Wolfson v Syracuse Newspapers,*254 App Div 211, *affd*279 NY 716). The case law has defined the term "publication” to mean the earliest date on which the work was placed on sale or became generally available to the public *(see, Gregoire v Putnam’s Sons,*298 NY 119, 125 [applying the rule to books]; *Rinaldi v Viking Penguin,*52 NY2d 422, 434-435 [applying the rule to paperback editions]; *see also, Zuck v Interstate Publ. Corp.,*317 F2d 727; *Khaury v Playboy Publ.,*430 F Supp 1342, 1344; *Pascuzzi v Montcalm Publ. Corp.,*65 AD2d 786; *Sorge v Parade Publ.,*20 AD2d 338, 343). In *Dannemann v Doubleday & Co.*(9 Med L Rptr 1247, 1249 [SD NY 1983]), the court further held that actual sales to the public are unnecessary to establish the publication date.

*735In this case, the unambiguous and uncontroverted evidence in the record, consisting of the appellants’ records and evidence of industry practice, extensive newspaper advertisements and even bookstore records reflecting actual sales, mandates the conclusion that publication of the book in hardcover by William Morrow & Company, Inc., and in paperback by St. Martin’s Press Incorporated preceded the plaintiffs commencement of the action by more than the applicable one-year period of limitations. Consequently, the court erred in failing to grant the appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Kooper, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 901 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 316
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 901

                          [Report No. 114-415]

 To prohibit accessing pornographic web sites from Federal computers, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2015

 Mr. Meadows introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

                            February 4, 2016

                     Additional sponsor: Mr. Jones

                            February 4, 2016

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit accessing pornographic web sites from Federal computers, 
                        and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminating Pornography from 
Agencies Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCESSING PORNOGRAPHIC WEB SITES FROM FEDERAL 
              COMPUTERS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Except as provided in subsection (b), not later 
than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director 
of the Office of Management and Budget shall issue guidelines that 
prohibit the access of a pornographic or other explicit web site from a 
Federal computer.
    (b) Exception.--The prohibition described in subsection (a) shall 
not apply to any Federal computer that is used for an investigative 
purpose that requires accessing a pornographic web site.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 316

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 901

                          [Report No. 114-415]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To prohibit accessing pornographic web sites from Federal computers, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 4, 2016

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-11275

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BARRY ROBERT TURNER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-85-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Barry Robert Turner has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Turner has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow

us to make a fair evaluation of Turner’s claim of ineffective assistance of 

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-11275 Document: 00513012457 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
No. 13-11275

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 135 S. Ct. 123 (2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Turner’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-11275 Document: 00513012457 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
Exhibit 99.3





KPMG LLP

600 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West

Suite 1500

Tour KPMG

Montréal, Québec  H3A 0A3
Telephone      (514) 840-2100

Fax                 (514) 840-2187

Internet           www.kpmg.ca




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
  The Board of Directors
 Canadian National Railway Company
  We consent to the incorporation by reference of our Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm both dated February 1, 2013 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Canadian National Railway Company (the “Company”) as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, and  the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, in this annual report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012.
  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports in the registration statements (No. 333-163862, No. 333-163860, No. 333-131856, No. 333-71270, No. 333-53420, No. 333-53422 and No. 333-59337) on Form S-8 of the Company and in the registration statement (No. 333-177633) on Form F-9 of the Company.













KPMG LLP





February 1, 2013





Montréal, Canada














_____*FCPA auditor, FCA, public accountancy permit No. A106087




KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG

network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative

(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
# C_2016202EN.01006401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/64

---

Article 43

(ex Article 37 TEC)

(ex Article 37 TEC)

1.   The Commission shall submit proposals for working out and implementing the common agricultural policy, including the replacement of the national organisations by one of the forms of common organisation provided for in Article 40(1), and for implementing the measures specified in this Title.

These proposals shall take account of the interdependence of the agricultural matters mentioned in this Title.

2.   The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, shall establish the common organisation of agricultural markets provided for in Article 40(1) and the other provisions necessary for the pursuit of the objectives of the common agricultural policy and the common fisheries policy.

3.   The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt measures on fixing prices, levies, aid and quantitative limitations and on the fixing and allocation of fishing opportunities.

4.   In accordance with paragraph 2, the national market organisations may be replaced by the common organisation provided for in Article 40(1) if:

| (a) | the common organisation offers Member States which are opposed to this measure and which have an organisation of their own for the production in question equivalent safeguards for the employment and standard of living of the producers concerned, account being taken of the adjustments that will be possible and the specialisation that will be needed with the passage of time; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the common organisation offers Member States which are opposed to this measure and which have an organisation of their own for the production in question equivalent safeguards for the employment and standard of living of the producers concerned, account being taken of the adjustments that will be possible and the specialisation that will be needed with the passage of time;

| (b) | such an organisation ensures conditions for trade within the Union similar to those existing in a national market. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

such an organisation ensures conditions for trade within the Union similar to those existing in a national market.

5.   If a common organisation for certain raw materials is established before a common organisation exists for the corresponding processed products, such raw materials as are used for processed products intended for export to third countries may be imported from outside the Union.

---