Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 64347 

TABLE 1 TO § 100.1102 

*******

20. IJSBA World Finals 

Sponsor ........................................... International Jet Sporting Association (IJSBA). 

Event Description ............................ Personal Watercraft Race. 

Date ................................................. October 1, 2016 through October 9, 2016. 

Location ........................................... Lake Havasu City, AZ. 

Regulated Area ............................... The navigable waters of Lake Havasu, AZ in the area known as Crazy Horse Campgrounds. 

Dated: September 6, 2016. 

E.M. Cooper, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting, 

Captain of the Port San Diego. 

[FR Doc. 2016–22611 Filed 9–19–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2016–0877] 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; 

Willamette River, Portland, OR 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of deviation from 

drawbridge regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a 

temporary deviation from the operating 

schedule that governs three Multnomah 

County, Oregon bridges: the Broadway 

Bridge; the Burnside Bridge; and the 

Hawthorne Bridge; all crossing the 

Willamette River at Portland, OR. The 

deviation is necessary to accommodate 

the Portland Marathon foot race event. 

This deviation allows the bridges to 

remain in the closed-to-navigation 

position to allow for the safe movement 

of event participants. 

DATES: This deviation is effective from 

5 a.m. to 3 p.m. on October 9, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this 

deviation, [USCG–2016–0877] is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Type the docket number in the 

‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ 

Click on Open Docket Folder on the line 

associated with this deviation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this temporary 

deviation, call or email Mr. Steven 

Fischer, Bridge Administrator, 

Thirteenth Coast Guard District; 

telephone 206–220–7282, email d13-pfd13bridges@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Multnomah County, Oregon has 

requested a temporary deviation from 

the operating schedule for the Broadway 

Bridge, mile 11.7; Burnside Bridge, mile 

12.4; and Hawthorne Bridge, mile 13.1; 

all crossing the Willamette River at 

Portland, OR. The deviation is necessary 

to accommodate Portland Marathon 

participants’ safe movement over the 

bridges. To facilitate this event, the 

draws of theses bridges will be 

maintained as follows: The Broadway 

Bridge provides a vertical clearance of 

90 feet in the closed-to-navigation 

position; the Burnside Bridge provides a 

vertical clearance of 64 feet in the 

closed-to-navigation position; and the 

Hawthorne Bridge provides a vertical 

clearance of 49 feet in the closed-tonavigation position; all clearances are 

referenced to the vertical clearance 

above Columbia River Datum 0.0. The 

normal operating schedule for all three 

bridges is in 33 CFR 117.897. 

The deviation period is from 5 a.m. 

until 3 p.m. on October 9, 2016. 

Waterway usage on the Willamette River 

ranges from commercial tug and barge to 

small pleasure craft. Vessels able to pass 

through the Broadway Bridge, the 

Burnside Bridge, and the Hawthorne 

Bridge in the closed-to-navigation 

position may do so at anytime. These 

bridges will be able to open for 

emergency vessels in route to a call. The 

Willamette River has no immediate 

alternate route for vessels to pass. The 

Coast Guard will also inform the users 

of the waterways through our Local and 

Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the 

change in operating schedule for the 

bridge so that vessels can arrange their 

transits to minimize any impact caused 

by the temporary deviation. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), 

the drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the designated time period. This 

deviation from the operating regulations 

is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: September 9, 2016. 

Steven M. Fischer, 

Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard 

District. 

[FR Doc. 2016–22548 Filed 9–19–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0407; FRL–9952–55– 

Region 7] 

Partial Approval and Partial 

Disapproval of Implementation Plans; 

State of Iowa; Infrastructure SIP 

Requirements for the 2008 Ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

partially approve and partially 

disapprove elements of the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submission 

from the State of Iowa addressing the 

applicable requirements of the Clean Air 

Act (CAA) section 110 for the 2008 

ozone NAAQS. Section 110 requires 

that each state adopt and submit a SIP 

to support the implementation, 

maintenance, and enforcement of each 

new or revised NAAQS promulgated by 

the EPA. These SIPs are commonly 

referred to as ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The 

infrastructure requirements are designed 

to ensure that the structural components 

of each state’s air quality management 

program are adequate to meet the state’s 

responsibilities under the CAA. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

October 21, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0407. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available electronically at 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
64348 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

www.regulations.gov and at EPA Region 

7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, 

Kansas 66219. Please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Heather Hamilton, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 

(913) 551–7039, or by email at 

Hamilton.heather@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section 

provides additional information by 

addressing the following: 

I. What is being addressed in this document? 

II. What action is EPA taking? 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

EPA is taking final action to partially 

approve and partially disapprove the 

infrastructure SIP submission received 

from the State of Iowa on January 17, 

2013. EPA is approving the following 

elements of section 110(a)(2): (A), (B), 

(C), (D)(i)(II)—prong 3 only, (E) through 

(H), and (J) through (M). 

EPA is disapproving element 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—prong 4. EPA did not 

act on sections 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—prongs 

1 and 2, and 110(a)(2)(I). 

A Technical Support Document (TSD) 

is included as part of the docket to 

discuss the details of this rulemaking. 

The proposal to approve the 

infrastructure SIP submission was 

published on Friday July 29, 2016, in 

the Federal Register. 81 FR 49911. The 

comment period ended August 29, 2016. 

There were no comments on the 

proposal. 

II. What action is EPA taking? 

The EPA is taking final action to 

partially approve and partially 

disapprove the January 17, 2013 

submission from the State of Iowa 

which addresses the requirements of 

CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as 

applicable to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. 

Based on review of the state’s 

infrastructure SIP submissions and 

relevant statutory and regulatory 

authorities and provisions referenced in 

those submissions or referenced in 

Iowa’s SIP, EPA believes that Iowa’s SIP 

meets the elements of sections 110(a)(1) 

and (2) with respect to the 2008 ozone 

NAAQS. EPA is taking final action to 

partially approve and partially 

disapprove the infrastructure SIP 

submission received from the State of 

Iowa on January 17, 2013. EPA is 

approving the following elements of 

section 110(a)(2): (A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)— 

prong 3 only, (E) through (H), and (J) 

through (M). EPA is disapproving 

element 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—prong 4. The 

EPA is not required to take further 

action with respect to prong 4 because 

the CSAPR Federal Implementation 

Plan already in place achieves the 

necessary emission reductions. EPA did 

not act on sections 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)— 

prongs 1 and 2, and 110(a)(2)(I). 

The EPA’s analysis of these 

submissions is addressed in a TSD as 

part of the docket. 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by November 21, 2016. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Prevention of significant 

deterioration, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: September 8, 2016. 

Mark Hague, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52 

as set forth below: 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 64349 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart Q—Iowa 

■ 2. In section 52.820(e), the table is 

amended by adding entry (43) in 

numerical order to read as follows: 

§ 52.820 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED IOWA NONREGULATORY SIP PROVISIONS

Name of 

non-regulatory 

SIP revision 

Applicable 

geographic or 

nonattainment 

area 

State submittal 

date EPA Approval date Explanation 

*******

(43) Sections 110(a)(1) 

and (2) Infrastructure 

Requirements 2008 

Ozone NAAQS.

Statewide .......... 1/17/13 9/20/16 and [Insert Federal Register citation].This action approves the following CAA elements: 

110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)—prong 3 only, 

(E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—prong 4 is disapproved. 

110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. [EPA–R07–OAR– 

2016–0407; FRL–9952–55–Region 7]. 

* * * * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2016–22503 Filed 9–19–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0501; FRL–9952–44– 

Region 7] 

Approval of Iowa’s Air Quality 

Implementation Plans; Correction 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule; correcting 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) inadvertently approved 

and codified incorrect entries for final 

rule actions published in the Federal 

Register. This technical amendment 

corrects the entries. 

DATES: This rule is effective on 

September 20, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan 

Simpson at (913) 551–7089, or by email 

at simpson.jan@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA 

inadvertently approved and codified 

incorrect entries in paragraph (c) to 40 

CFR 52.820 for three separate final rule 

actions published in the Federal 

Register. The first published on June 11, 

2015, the second published on August 

14, 2015, and the third published on 

June 17, 2016. 

The June 11, 2015 (80 FR 33192), 

Federal Register direct final action 

approving revisions to chapter 22 rule 

567–22.3 ‘‘Issuing Permits’’ omitted the 

following sentence in the explanation 

column on page 33194 ‘‘Subrule 22.3(6) 

has not been approved as part of the 

SIP. Subrule 22.3(6), Limits on 

Hazardous Air Pollutants, has been 

approved under Title V and section 

112(l). The remainder of the rule has not 

been approved pursuant to Title V and 

section 112(l)’’. Therefore we are 

correcting page 33194 of the June 11, 

2015, Federal Register direct final rule 

to add the missing language to the 

explanation column in table section 

52.820 (c). The August 14, 2015 (80 FR 

48718), Federal Register final rule 

codification of this same rule, chapter 

22 rule 567–22.3 ‘‘Issuing Permits’’, 

state effective date and the citation 

information in the EPA approval date 

column is incorrect. Therefore, we are 

correcting page 48720 of the August 14, 

2015, Federal Register final rule to 

reflect the most current Federallyapproved information by changing the 

state effective date and the EPA 

approval date column information. 

The June 17, 2016 (81 FR 39585), 

Federal Register direct final action 

approving revisions to chapter 20 rule 

567.20.2 ‘‘Definitions’’ state effective 

date of May 7, 2008, on page 39587 is 

correct, however the state effective date 

April 22, 2015, published on June 11, 

2015 (80 FR 33192) is the most current 

chronological effective date of this rule. 

By using the most current chronological 

effective date, we provide the reader a 

clear understanding of the Federallyapproved state effective date of this rule. 

Therefore, we are correcting page 39587 

of the June 17, 2016, Federal Register 

direct final action to reflect the 

information of the most chronological 

effective and EPA approval dates. 

Dated: September 6, 2016. 

Mark Hague, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart Q—Iowa 

■ 2. Amend § 52.820(c) by revising the 

entries for 567–20.2 and 567–22.3 to 

read as follows: 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES