alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Final Performance Report

A Final Performance Report must be received within 90 days after the end of the grant agreement. Final Performance Reports are required to fulfill the terms of the grant agreement, and are an important vehicle for sharing research findings with other interested groups and the public. The completed Final Performance Report will be posted to the AMS website.

# Grant Information

## Agreement

## Recipient

# Performance Narrative

## pROJECT bACKGROUND

Provide enough information for the reader to understand the importance or context of the project. This section may draw from the background and justification contained in the approved project proposal.

## Activities Performed

Address the below sections as they relate to the grant’s period of performance.

### Objectives

Provide the approved project’s objectives. 

*If no is selected for any of the listed objectives, you must expand upon this in the challenges and lessons learned sections.

### Accomplishments

List your accomplishments for this reporting period and indicate how these accomplishments assist in the fulfillment of your project’s objective(s), outcome(s), and/or indicator(s). This listing should identify your project’s partners and their contributions.

### Challenges and Developments

Provide any challenges to the completion of your project or any positive developments outside of the project’s original intent that you experienced during this reporting period. If those challenges or developments resulted or will result in corrective actions and/or changes to the project, include those in the space below.

### Lessons Learned

Provide recommendations or advice that others may use to improve their performance in implementing similar projects.

### Continuation and Dissemination of Results (If Applicable)

Describe your plans for continuing the project (sustainability; capacity building) and/or disseminating the project results. 

## Outcome(s) and Indictator(s)/Sub-Indicator(s)

Provide the results of the project outcome(s) and indicator(s) as approved in your application or approved amendment to your application.

### Outcome and Indicator Results to Date

Quantify the overall progress on the outcomes and indictors of your project.

### Discussion of Results

If necessary, include further explanation of the quantifiable results to date.

## Project Expenditures

### Expenditures

### Program Income (if applicable)

## Additional Information

Provide additional information available (i.e., publications, websites, photographs) that is not applicable to any of the prior sections.

Page | 3
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Drying Cod
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

EverGreene Painting Studios

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1994

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

Representing the Great Banks and North Atlantic fisheries, this vignette depicts salt bins, a rod shed, and a pier; a three-masted ship is seen offshore.About the Cox Corridors MuralsThe first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The western north-south corridor, called the Westward Expansion corridor, includes maps and scenes showing the growth of the United States from early exploration through the acquisition of Alaska and Hawaii. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19E0016. DAKER v. OWENS et al.

Waseem Daker has moved for an extension of time to file his applications for

discretionary appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing Case Nos. 2016-CV282190, 2017-CV-287003, and 2017-CV-289004.

1 Daker’s request for an extension

of time is hereby GRANTED. See Gable v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 84 (2) (a) (720 SE2d

170) (2011) (extensions of time to file discretionary applications may be granted

pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-39 (a) (5)). Daker shall have thirty (30) days from the date

of this order to file his applications for discretionary appeal.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 Daker’s motion lists the final case as 2017-CV-289404, rather than 2017-CV289004.

October 30, 2018

10/30/2018
#### Campbell v. Campbell

22350

07/16/2001

Affirmed
# C_2016203EN.01003701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/37

---

Article 98

Member States shall take all measures necessary to facilitate the conclusion of insurance contracts covering nuclear risks.

The Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, which shall first request the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee, shall, after consulting the European Parliament, issue directives for the application of this Article.

---
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

          Pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002
          (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

          Pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002
          (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),  the  undersigned,  Joseph V. Roberts,
          Chief  Executive  Officer of Nutrition  Management  Services
          Company,  a Pennsylvania  corporation (the "Company"),  does
          hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

          The  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended
          December  31,  2005  of the  Company  (the  "Report")  fully
          complies with the  requirements  of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
          of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
          contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
          respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                            /s/ Joseph V. Roberts
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Joseph V. Roberts
                                            Chief Executive Officer

          March 8, 2006
```
### 2010 HCFC Allowance allocation and presentation of additional calculations from Solvay Magid, Don t o : Drusilla Hufford 03/07/2011 03:06 PM

Cc: Rustch.Linda, Staci Gatica, Jeremy Arling, "Looney, Mark", "Williamson, David M.", "Escobar, Carlos", "Brint, Arienne", Diane McConkey, Luke Hall-Jordan, "Jones, Charles"

Dear Ms. Hufford, Thank you for making time to discuss with representatives of Solvay on February 7th issues related to the HCFC Allowance Allocation and the EPA's January 28th En forcement Policy. I have attached for your review additional comments and second set of calc ulations we completed that would address the shortfall of HCFC-22 allowances for Solvay and Ar kema in 2010, in addition to those we provided on October 6, 2010. In these calculations, as before, two methods are shown, however now, the first method uses only the 2012 control period (rather than 2011) to make up for the 2010 shortfall and the second method uses only three control periods (2012 -2014) to make up for the 2010 shortfall (rather than four) . Also, please note that now the information contai ned, including the October 6, 20010 letter can be considered as not containing Company Confidential information and available for including in the public record and referenced as needed by the EPA As in the past, we would be pleased to discuss the ca lculations and methods if a fuller explanation would be helpful. Thank you very much for your time and consideration related to this matter.
<<2011 03 07 EPA correspondence from Solvay.pdf>>

Sincerely,
Don Magid Sales and Marketing Manager Solvay Fluorides, LLC 3333 Richmond Ave. Houston, TX 77098 Tel: 713 525 6585 Fax: 713 525 6759 e-mail: don.magid@solvay.com



### --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the addressee or an authorized recipient of this message, any distribution, copying, p ublication or use of this information for any purpose is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and then delete this message. Ce message est confidentiel. Si vous n'etes

### p as le destinataire designe de ce message ou une personne autorisee a l'utiliser, toute distribution, copie, p ublication ou usage a quelques fins que ce soit des informations contenues dans ce message sont interdits. Merci d'informer immediatement l'expediteur par messagerie electronique et d'ensuite detruire ce message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**594 CAF 14-01955** 
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF LUCILLE A. SOLDATO, COMMISSIONER, ONEIDA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ON BEHALF OF JOHANN BENSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RAYMOND BENSON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

RICHARD P. FERRIS, UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Randal B. Caldwell, J.), entered February 26, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order denied the objections of petitioner to an order of a Support Magistrate.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the objections are granted, the petition is granted, and respondent is directed to pay child support in the amount of $26 per week retroactive to September 12, 2013.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding on behalf of the mother of the children at issue seeking an order directing respondent father to pay child support. The Support Magistrate calculated respondent’s presumptive support obligation at $26 per week, but determined that respondent was not obligated to pay support because he had physical custody of the children for a majority of the time under his custody arrangement with the mother and was thus not a noncustodial parent within the meaning of Family Court Act § 413 (1) (f) (10) ( see generally Rubin v Della Salla , 107 AD3d 60, 67-68). Family Court denied petitioner’s objections to the order of the Support Magistrate, and petitioner appeals.

We conclude that, contrary to the determination of the Support Magistrate, the custody order between respondent and the mother is intended to divide physical custody of the children equally ( see Redder v Redder , 17 AD3d 10, 13; cf. Rubin , 107 AD3d at 68-71). Respondent, as the parent with the higher income and greater pro rata share of the child support obligation, is therefore the noncustodial parent for support purposes ( see Leonard v Leonard , 109 AD3d 126, 128- 129; Matter of Moore v Shapiro , 30 AD3d 1054, 1055), and should have been ordered to pay child support to the mother. In addition, we agree with petitioner that the children’s receipt of public assistance**-2- 594 CAF 14-01955** 

precludes respondent from obtaining any reduction of his support obligation based on expenses incurred while he has custody of the children ( see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [f] [9]; Matter of Pandozy v Gaudette , 192 AD2d 779, 780). Consequently, we reverse the order, grant petitioner’s objections, grant the petition, and direct respondent to pay child support in the amount of $26 per week retroactive to September 12, 2013, the date on which the children became eligible for public assistance ( see § 449 [2]; Matter of Davis v Swain , 281 AD2d 545, 545; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. v Daryl S. , 235 AD2d 126, 130).

Entered: May 8, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Moczo, Also Known as Robert Mozco, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), rendered August 22, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him to a term of from 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

We reject defendant’s claim of a *Batson*violation *(Batson v Kentucky,*476 US 79), asserted on the ground that the prosecutor used two peremptory challenges to exclude two black venire persons but did not challenge a white juror with an allegedly similar employment background. *(See, United States v Alvarado,*923 F2d 253.) While the black jurors were involved in creative employment (theatre and music), the seated white juror merely worked in an unspecified capacity in the television industry. Accordingly, we accord appropriate deference to the trial court’s determination that the prosecution adequately articulated a non-pretextual, racially neutral reason for peremptorily challenging these two black jurors. *(People v Kern, 75*NY2d 638.)

The suppression court properly ruled that the description of defendant by the undercover police officer who made the buy adequately described defendant. It is of minimal significance that defendant was described as "Hispanic” when, in fact, he may be black Hispanic. *(People v Polk,*166 AD2d 177, *lv denied*76 NY2d 1023.) This is especially true where defendant matched that part of the description that the suspect was wearing a green army jacket and blue hood, and that he was found within blocks of where the crime took place minutes before *(People v Hicks,*68 NY2d 234). Concur—Sullivan, J. R, Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

NANCY M. LENAU AND DANIEL T.

LENAU AND KATHLEEN TRIESCHOCK

ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND

OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

 Petitioners

 v.

CO-EXPRISE, INC.,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 483 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-23-056]

*Agency Holding the Meeting:*                     United States International Trade Commission.                

# TIME AND DATE: 

December 6, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        1.                         *Agendas for future meetings:*                         none.                    

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Commission vote on Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1378-1379 (Review)(Low Melt Polyester Staple Fiber (PSF) from South Korea and Taiwan). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on December 13, 2023.

                        5.                         *Outstanding action jackets:*                         none.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.

The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission:

Issued: November 22, 2023.

Sharon Bellamy,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-26214 Filed 11-22-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
FILED IK

CAUSE NO 01-15-00066-CV '^SrS^fLs

IN THE APR 21-2QI5

CHRISTOPHER A Prime FIRSTCOURT OF APPEALS CLERK

HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS

PATRICK OLAJIDE AKINWAMIDE

APPELLANT

V

TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY

CNA INSURANCE COMPANY AND

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC.

APPELLEES

FROM THE 80th DISTRICT COURT

OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

REQUEST FOR COMPLETE CERTIFED RECORD OF THE CIURT

REPORTER'S RECORD OF A "SHOW CAUSE" HEARING HELD ON

OCTOBER 24,2014 IN CAUSE NO. 97-48526

PATRICK OLAJIDE AKINWAMIDE, PROSE

2151 SOUTH KIRKWOOD ROAD, #295

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77077

(832)620-9345
REQUEST FOR COMPLETE CERTIFED RECORD OF THE CIURT

REPORTER'S RECORD OF A "SHOW CAUSE" HEARING HELD ON

OCTOBER 24.2014 IN CAUSE NO. 97-48526

The Court Reporter

80th District Court

Subsequent to my requests ofNovember 25,2014 and February 2,2015,

Appellant hereby request the complete certified Court Reporter's Record ofa "Show

Cause" hearing held onOctober 24,2014 inCause No. 97-48526 atthe80* District

Court, Harris County Texas.

The record should be a complete record ofthe hearing including but not limited

to evidences present, objections, and evidences admitted at the hearing. Thank you

for your cooperation in this matter.

Respectfully,

Patrick Olajide Akinwamide, Pro Se

2151 S. KirkwoodRd., Apt. 295

Houston, TX 77077

Tel: (832) 620-9345
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify mat a true and correct copy ofthe forgoing instrument was delivered

via certified mail, return receipt requested or hand delivered to all counsels ofrecord

on this the 21st day ofApril 2015.

Michelle C. Tucker or Substitute

Official Court Reporter

80* District Court

201 Caroline, Room 915

Harris County Civil Courthouse

Houston, Texas 77002

Mr. Jeffrey L. Diamond

TX Bar No. 058025000

1010 San Jacinto Street

Houston, Texas 77002

Attorney ofRecord for Transportation Insurance Company, CNA Insurance Company

and Automatic Data Processing Inc.

Patrick Olajide Akinwamide, Pro Se

2151 S. Kirkwood Rd., Apt. 295

Houston, TX 77077

Tel: (832) 620-9345
# C_2016202EN.01039801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/398 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/398

---

Article 25

The rights of the elderly

The Union recognises and respects the rights of the elderly to lead a life of dignity and independence and to participate in social and cultural life.

---
H. Res. 121 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 25, 2015. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 529) to 

amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve 529 

plans. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 

amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, 

as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; 

and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. At any time after adoption of this resolution the 

Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare 

the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole House 
2 

•HRES 121 EH 

on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 

5) to support State and local accountability for public education, protect State and local authority, inform parents of 

the performance of their children’s schools, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce. After general debate, the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion. No further 

consideration of the bill shall be in order except pursuant to 

a subsequent order of the House. 

SEC. 3. The requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for 

a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on 

Rules on the same day it is presented to the House is waived 

with respect to any resolution reported through the legislative 

day of March 2, 2015, relating to a measure making or continuing appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015. 

SEC. 4. It shall be in order at any time through the calendar day of March 1, 2015, for the Speaker to entertain 

motions that the House suspend the rules as though under 

clause 1 of rule XV, relating to a measure making or con-
3 

•HRES 121 EH 

tinuing appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk.