alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
User Fee Obligations by Program for FY19 

FY 2019 

Grain Insp. & 

Weigh. 

Grain I&W 

$/MT 

Grain Official 

Agencies Supv 

Grain OA 

Supv $/MT Rice Commodities 

5 Year Rolling Average (FY14-18) 124,671,254 

Actual Metric Tons FY 2019 107,898,402 206,693,881 

Salary and Benefits $ 29,918,624 0.277 $ 968,648 0.005 $4,052,680 $1,751,020 

Travel $ 762,764 0.007 $ 49,842 0.000 $160,117 $56,062 

Shipping and Moving Expenses $ (9,327) 0.000 $ - - $11,124 $1,095 

Rent and Utilities $ 805,656 0.007 $ 15,847 0.000 $155,643 $68,403 

Printing $ 66,630 0.001 $ 4,331 0.000 $10,513 $6,938 

1 Other Services $ 5,638,221 0.052 $ 507,059 0.002 $992,500 $659,053 

Supplies and Materials $ 435,921 0.004 $ 5,215 0.000 $25,546 $34,094 

Equipment $ 290,108 0.003 $ - - $61,214 $39,530 

Grants, Subsidies, and Contributions $ (12) 0.000 $ - - $0 $0 

Insurance Claims $ 1,423 0.000 $ - - $55 $0 

Interest Paid $ 181 0.000 $ 5 0.000 $34 $22 

TOTAL $ 37,910,189 $ 0.351 $ 1,550,946 $ 0.008 $ 5,469,426 $ 2,616,217 

1

Other Services includes AMS overhead costs, Agency and Mission Area-level administrative support costs (e.g., Information 

Technology and Human Resource Support), as well as costs for FGIS contracts and training. 

Dated: 02/10/2020
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the followingRegistration Statements of Nexen Inc.:

 

·                                          RegistrationStatement No.’s 033-26582, 033-34467, 033-43426, 033-66538, 033-81334, 333-05494,333-07344, 333-09286, 333-13574, 333-118019 and 333-119276 on Form S-8;

 

·                                          RegistrationStatement No.’s 333-09288, 333-10646, 333-84786 and 333-142670 on Form F-3; and

 

·                                          RegistrationStatement No.’s 333-125019, 333-128510 and 333-143380 on Form F-10.

 

of our reports dated February 13, 2008, relating to the financialstatements of Nexen Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on thefinancial statements and includes a separate report on Canada-United States ofAmerica reporting difference) and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nexen Inc.for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Independent Registered Chartered Accountants

Calgary, Canada

 

February 21, 2008

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          10,474
<SECURITIES>                                    24,146
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,313
<PP&E>                                          23,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,990
<BONDS>                                            743
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,184
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,337
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,301
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,301
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2023)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 82777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26134]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 225 / Friday, November 24, 2023 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 82777]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2024-02 of November 16, 
                2023

                
Presidential Determination on the Proposed 
                Agreement for Cooperation Between the Government of the 
                United States of America and the Government of the 
                Republic of the Philippines Concerning Peaceful Uses of 
                Nuclear Energy

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the 
                Secretary of Energy

                I have considered the proposed Agreement for 
                Cooperation between the Government of the United States 
                of America and the Government of the Republic of the 
                Philippines Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy 
                (the ``proposed Agreement''), along with the views, 
                recommendations, and statements of the interested 
                departments and agencies.

                I have determined that the performance of the proposed 
                Agreement will promote, and will not constitute an 
                unreasonable risk to, the common defense and security. 
                Pursuant to section 123 b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 
                1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2153(b)), I hereby approve 
                the proposed Agreement and authorize the Secretary of 
                State to arrange for its execution.

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                publish this determination in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, November 16, 2023

[FR Doc. 2023-26134
Filed 11-22-23; 11:15 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
Order entered August 28, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-14-01101-CV

IN RE CARLISLE COATINGS & WATERPROOFING, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-02576-2014



### ORDER

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.

We DENY as moot relator’s motion for temporary relief and stay. We ORDER relator to bear

the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). JW / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HT I N L I N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 05- 73547 A ge nc yN o. A 079- 594- 596 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , an dT A S H IM A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H t i n L i n, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f M yanm ar , pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de ra f f i rm i ng an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s app l i cat i on for a sy l um and w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 

# FI LED DE C 02 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ W / Res ea r ch 05- 73547 2 8 U . S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e rev i ew fo r su b st an t i al ev i d en ce ad v erse cred i b i l i ty fi n d i n g s, Ch e b c h o u b v . I

NS , 257 F . 3d 1038, 1043 ( 9th C i r . 2001) , and w e de nythe pe t i t i on f o rr e v i e w. T he agency f

ou nd L i n n otcr edi bl e i n p artbecause of an i ncon si st ency reg ard i n g h i s m em b ersh i p i n th e A l l B u rm a S tu d en tD em o crat i c F ro n t . B ecau se th is in c o n s is te n c yg o e s to th e h e art o f L in ’s c la im , an dth e a g e n c yr e a s o n ab ly re j ec t ed L i n’ s proff

er ed expl anat i on for the i ncon si st ency , subst ant i alevi dence s up p o rts th e a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n . Se e W a n gv . I NS , 352 F . 3d 1250, 1259 ( 9th C i r . 2003) ( “ S o l ong a s one of the i de nt i f

i e d gr ounds i s s upport e d by s ub s t an t i a l e v i d e n c e an dg o e s t o th e h e arto f [ p e t i t i o n e r ’ s ] c l a i m o f

p e r s e c u t i o n , we ar e b o u n dto a c c e p t th e [ a g e n c y ’s ] a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityf in d in g .” ) . A c c o r d in g ly , in the abs e nc e of

c r e di bl e t e s t i m ony , L i n f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h e l i gi bi l i tyf ora s y l um and w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. Se e Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 34 8 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 56 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TUT
SYSTEMS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         157,248
<SECURITIES>                                     9,246
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (335)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,692
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,571
<PP&E>                                           6,574
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,969
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                     210,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,465
<SALES>                                         16,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,474
<CGS>                                            9,137
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,235)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,236)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.34)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-60312

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOHN PEDELAHORE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:15-CR-24

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Pedelahore appeals the 10-year term of supervised release imposed 

by the district court following its revocation of his prior five-year term of 

supervised release. Pedelahore was convicted of using the Internet to coerce 

and entice a minor for illegal sexual activity. He argues that his supervised 

release term is substantively unreasonable because the district court failed to 

account for a factor that should have received significant weight, and the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 25, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-60312 Document: 00513395907 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/25/2016
No. 15-60312

2

sentence represented a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing 

factors. We review a preserved challenge to revocation sentences under the 

plainly unreasonable standard. United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th 

Cir. 2011).

In imposing sentence, the district court considered the advisory policy 

statements and the appropriate sentencing factors. The district court also 

considered the testimony of Dr. Richard Strebeck who, among other things, 

testified that he was not able to quantify Pedelahore’s risk level and opined 

that Pedelahore required continued supervised release. The record shows that 

the district court did not ignore mitigating factors. Dr. Strebeck testified that 

Pedelahore received group counseling from him for about one year, and an 

unspecified amount and type of counseling from a prior counselor. The district 

court heard this testimony and did not consider Pedelahore’s specific lack of 

one-on-one counseling to be a mitigating factor. See United States v. Alvarado, 

691 F.3d 592, 597 (5th Cir. 2012) (finding appellant’s mere belief that 

mitigating factors should have been balanced differently insufficient to disturb 

the presumption of reasonableness). Finally, even though Pedelahore’s 

supervised release violations were only Grade C, he admitted to five separate 

violations. Pedelahore cites no authority for the proposition that a 10-year 

term of supervised release is plainly unreasonable when imposed for multiple 

Grade C violations.

Given the above, the district court’s imposition of a 10-year term of 

supervised release following revocation was not plainly unreasonable. See 

Miller, 634 F.3d at 843.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-60312 Document: 00513395907 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/25/2016
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply11783Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Mona Amatie (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 10, 2022 - 9:05pmWhat an inspiring story of positivity, resilience and intent! Your choice to respond to your personal tragedy in such a humble and selfless manner is awe inspiring. Thank you for sharing your story and your SELF! May peace and light be your blessings always!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 2, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-30983 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RYAN D. ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 03-CR-50002-ALL

-------------------- Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appointed counsel for Ryan D. Roberson has filed a motion to withdraw and an accompanying brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Roberson has not filed a
response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We note, however, that the bill of information charged Roberson with conspiracy toNo. 03-30983 -2- distribute cocaine base but the judgment states the offense as conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base. Accordingly, Roberson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, but the matter is REMANDED TO THE DISTRICT COURT for correction of the clerical error pursuant to F ED . R. C RIM . P. 36. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is DENIED.
#### FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. v. NOLLMAN. FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. v. SAME.

Nos. 9136, 9137.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 14, 1939.

Edgar A. Neely, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

Frank A. Hooper, Jr., of Atlanta, Ga., for appellees.

Before FOSTER, SIBLEY and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

These two cases present the same questions of fact and law. Appellee, Mrs. R. M. Nollman, was injured by slipping on ice that had formed on the sidewalk in front of appellant’s premises, alleged to have resulted from its negligence.

The only question presented for decision is whether the District Court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence; and, in the alternative, for judgment non-obstante veredicto, or a new trial.

We find substantial evidence in the record tending to support the verdict.

Affirmed.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 11, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00753

- CV

K. E. M., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFOR E CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD
DISMISSED AS MOOT

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on November 4, 2014

. T he Texas

Department of Family and Protective Services ha s filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot

,

and having considered the record and the motion, the Court agrees that the appeal is moot.

Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the app eal

. No adjudication of costs

is made.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 903 

To require notification of individuals of breaches of personally identifiable 

information through Exchanges under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2015 

Mr. PITTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require notification of individuals of breaches of personally identifiable information through Exchanges under 

the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Exchange Secu5 rity and Transparency Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 903 IH

1 SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS OF BREACHES OF 

2 PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION 

3 THROUGH PPACA EXCHANGES. 

4 Not later than two business days after the discovery 

5 of a breach of security of any system maintained by an 

6 Exchange established under section 1311 or 1321 of the 

7 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 18031, 18041) which is known to have resulted in person9 ally identifiable information of an individual being stolen 

10 or unlawfully accessed, the Secretary of Health and 

11 Human Services shall provide notice of such breach to 

12 each such individual. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the annual report on Form 20-F of KHD Humboldt Wedag International Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of KHD Humboldt Wedag International Ltd.
 Dated:
April 3, 2007/s/
James B. BuscheJames B. BuschePresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the annual report on Form 20-F of KHD Humboldt Wedag International Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of KHD Humboldt Wedag International Ltd.
 Dated:
April 3, 2007/s/
Michael J. SmithMichael J. SmithChief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)