alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus II Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2004 (the Report), I, Harry O. Nicodemus IV, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                              
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 17, 2004 |  |  |  | /S/    HARRY O. NICODEMUS IV                 
|                    |  |  |  |                                              
|                    |  |  |  | Harry O. Nicodemus IV Chief Financial Officer
P.O. Box 3790 – Belleview, Florida 34421-3790

Telephone (352) 245-2437; FAX (352) 245-9434

October 26, 2022

Via electronic mail to: Dana.coale@usda.gov

Ms. Dana Coale, Deputy Administrator 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

United States Department of Agriculture 

USDA-AMS-1400 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, D.C. 20250-0225

 Re: Request for a hearing to amend Federal Milk Marketing Orders 5, 6, and 7

Dear Ms. Coale,

 This letter confirms the support of Southeast Milk, Inc. for a hearing to amend the 

southeastern US federal milk orders as requested by DCMA in the request letter from Attorney 

Marvin Beshore. This further confirms our support for the five proposals submitted with the 

hearing request. We respectfully request that a hearing be held on an emergency basis to 

expedite the relief requested to our orders.

Sincerely,

Shawn Dyal

Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Cybrdi, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-k for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.





3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  March 31, 2011





By:
/s/ YANBIAO BAIYanBiao BaiChief Executive Officer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply498Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  John Pork (not verified)PermalinkMay 2, 2023 - 6:13pmThis is so cool!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 

FIFTH DISTRICT 

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED 

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D17-126

SHERRY SMITH, PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF JULIUS B. SMITH, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed March 27, 2018 

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Volusia County,

Dennis Craig, Judge.

Charles R.A. Morse, of Jones Day, New 

York, NY, Jason T. Burnette, of Jones 

Day, Atlanta, GA, Troy A. Fuhrman, and 

Marie Attaway Borland, of Hill Ward 

Henderson, Tampa, and Donald B. Ayer, 

of Jones Day, Washington, D.C., for 

Appellant. 

David J. Sales, and Daniel R. Hoffman, of

David J. Sales, PA, Jupiter, and William J. 

Wichmann, of William J. Wichmann, P.A., 

Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. See Schoeff v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 232 So. 3d 294 (Fla. 

2017); R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Marotta, 214 So. 3d 590 (Fla. 2017); R.J. Reynolds 
2

Tobacco Co. v. Ciccone, 190 So. 3d 1028 (Fla. 2016); Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas, 

110 So. 3d 419 (Fla. 2013); Wald v. Grainger, 64 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 2011).

EVANDER, LAMBERT, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000879235
<NAME> AUTOCAM CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,517,832
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,611,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,050,244
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,894,254
<PP&E>                                      59,905,163
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,691,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,919,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,403,105
<BONDS>                                     10,632,535
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    26,238,418
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,033,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,919,484
<SALES>                                     45,975,116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,975,116
<CGS>                                       35,910,481
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,910,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,018,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,173,162
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,147,839
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,025,323
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,025,323
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 22003D0060 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22003D0060

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 60/2003 of 16 May 2003 amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 193 , 31/07/2003 P. 0046 - 0047 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 60/2003

of 16 May 2003

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 17/2003 of 31 January 2003(1).

(2) Regulation (EC) No 1991/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 October 2002 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 on the organisation of a labour force sample survey in the Community(2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall added in point 18a (Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98) of Annex XXI to the Agreement:

", as amended by:

- 32002 R 1991: Regulation (EC) No 1991/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 October 2002 (OJ L 308, 9.11.2002, p. 1)."

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 1991/2002 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 17 May 2003, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(3).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 16 May 2003.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

P. Westerlund

(1) OJ L 94, 10.4.2003, p. 76.

(2) OJ L 308, 9.11.2002, p. 1.

(3) Constitutional requirements indicated.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6138

KEENAN M. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MRS. LAROCK,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-04-608)

Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 6, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keenan M. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Keenan M. Williams appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his Bivens* action without prejudice for failure to pay

the initial partial filing fee required under the Prison Litigation

Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(b)(1)(A) (2000). The

district court ordered Williams to make a partial payment under the

PLRA within thirty days after its order of November 29, 2004. On

January 18, 2005, not having received the partial payment, the

district court dismissed Williams’ action. 

On appeal, Williams argues that he followed the proper

procedures to authorize the prison officials to debit his PLRA

payment from his inmate account and remit the payment to the

district court. Williams had, in fact, timely filed the

appropriate consent form to allow prison officials to withdraw the

amount of the PLRA payment from his inmate account and forward it

to the district court, and the prison’s inmate account transaction

statement shows Williams’ inmate account contained adequate funds

to make the partial payment on the date it was due and for two

weeks preceding the due date. However, prison officials did not

deduct the initial partial PLRA payment from his inmate account

until January 4, 2005. The district court’s docket reveals that

the payment was received and entered on January 19, 2005. 
- 3 -

Because it appears that the untimeliness of Williams’ initial

partial PLRA payment was through no fault of his own, we vacate the

district court’s order dismissing his action and remand this case

for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

VACATED AND REMANDED
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
    CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF AMEREN CORPORATION
    (required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
    Form 10-K
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)) Rules 13a-15(f) 15d-15(f))
  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared; b)
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
    caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
    designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
    regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
    preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
    accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and d)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and    a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:
    February 29, 2008
#### GREENWOOD TRUST COMPANY *v.*LESLIE S. HOLLO

(AC 20277)

Lavery, C. J., and Mihalakos and Zarella, Js.

Submitted on briefs June 14

officially released July 11, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
Non‐Pool Manufacturing Plants that Received F.O. 5 Diverted Milk During 6 or more Months, 2007

Year Name City State

Differential Prior to

May 2008**

2007 ASHE COUNTY CHES,W. JEFFERSON, NC W. JEFFERSON NC 2.95

2007 BEL CHEESE, LEITCHFIELD, KY LEITCHFIELD KY 2.4

2007 BLUEGRASS DAIRY LLC, GLASGOW, KY GLASGOW KY 2.4

2007 BLUEGRASS DY LLC, SPRINGFIELD, KY SPRINGFIELD KY 2.22007 CLOVER FARMS, READING, PA READING PA 2.8

2007 CROWLEY FOODS, BRISTOL, VA BRISTOL VA 2.82007 DAIRY CONCEPTS, PORTALES, NM PORTALES NM 2.1

2007 DAIRY FARM PRODUCTS, GOSHEN, IN GOSHEN IN 1.8

2007 DANNON YOGURT, MINSTER, OH MINSTER OH 22007 DIETRICH'S, READING, PA READING PA 2.82007 FAIRMONT PRODUCTS, BELLEVILLE, PA BELLEVILLE PA 2.7

2007 FARMERS CHEESE, NEW WILLINGTON, PA NEW WILLINGTON PA 2.1

2007 GETHSEMANI FARMS, TRAPPIST, KY TRAPPIST KY 2.2

2007 KRAFT, BENTONVILLE, AR BENTONVILLE AR 2.6

2007 LA QUESERA MEXICANA, GREENVILLE,TN GREENVILLE TN 2.8

2007 LADY OF ANGELS MONESTARY,CROZET,VA CROZET VA 2.8

2007 LAND‐O‐LAKES, CARLISLE, PA CARLISLE PA 2.8

2007 LAND‐O‐LAKES, DENMARK, WI DENMARK WI 1.752007 LAND‐O‐LAKES, KIEL, WI KIEL WI 1.75

2007 LEPRINO CHEESE, ALLENDALE, MI ALLENDALE MI 1.8

2007 LEVEL VALLEY, ANTIOCH, TN ANTIOCH TN 2.6

2007 MD. & VA., PLANT, LAUREL, MD LAUREL MD 3

2007 MEADOWBROOK DAIRY, ERIE, PA ERIE PA 2.12007 MIDDLEFIELD CHEESE, MIDDLEFIELD,OH MIDDLEFIELD OH 2

2007 SAPUTO CHEESE, HANCOCK, MD HANCOCK MD 2.8

2007 SUNNY MEADOWS DRY,OKLAHOMA CITY,OK OKLAHOMA CITY OK 2.62007 SUNSHINE BISCUIT, FREEMONT, OH FREEMONT OH 2

2007 SWEETWATER VALLEY, PHILADELPHIA,TN PHILADELPHIA TN 2.8

** Differentials were adjusted in May 2008.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply574Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  David Linn (no... (not verified)PermalinkOctober 19, 2017 - 2:17pmInteresting history!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
April 13, 2004

23341

#### State v. Buckman

Remanded
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4849

_____________________________

RICHARD J. HANCHETT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Michael A. Flowers, Judge.

September 6, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Richard J. Hanchett, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
May 16, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TRACY HOLLISTER, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00529-CV V.

MALONEY, MARTIN & MITCHELL LLP, MIKE MARTIN, P.C. AND MIKE 

MARTIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND FRANK W. MITCHELL, Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of APPELLEES, was 

heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no 

error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order APPELLANT to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals.

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number: 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/20/2015 10:47:31 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk