alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mrs. Edward WILSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION, REGION TWO, State of Utah, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 15033.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Nov. 17, 1977.

*683Lyle J. Barnes, Kaysville, for plaintiff and appellant.

Robert B. Hansen, Atty. Gen., Franklyn B. Matheson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, Ernest W. Jones, Asst. Weber County Atty., Ogden, for defendant and respondent.

ELLETT, Chief Justice:

This case was before us in 1976 wherein Mrs. Wilson appealed from a ruling of the trial court to the effect that she, as a grandmother, had no standing to interfere with the Family Services Division in its placement of her grandson for adoption.1 This Court reversed and held that the blood relationship between grandparent and grandchild is such that the court should have continued a stay of proceedings order until the grandmother could have her day in court.

That day as now been had. Mrs. Wilson’s counsel called the members of the defendant’s committee on the placement of children and tried to show that they acted arbitrarily and capriciously in placing the child in an adoptive home. He also tried to show that the committee never considered his client as a possible person to adopt the child. Mrs. Wilson also gave testimony as to her ability to rear the child, etc.

The trial court heard the testimony and held that in considering the placement of the child for adoption, the defendant (respondent) did not act capriciously or arbitrarily in any manner. All the committee witnesses testified that they had seriously considered the grandmother as one to whom adoption could be permitted, but that the welfare of the child was the paramount item in making the determination that they made.

At the hearing from which this appeal was taken, the witnesses were still of the opinion that the child should be left in the home in which he has resided for several years past. The trial court was justified in ruling as it did, and we should not substitute our judgment for that of the trial judge unless his judgment is clearly arbitrary or capricious and not based on the evidence.

In this case, the judge learned that Mrs. Wilson had been married three times; that she refused to speak to the mother of the child; that the mother voluntarily surrendered the child to the defendant for the purpose of adoption and specifically requested that the defendant not place the child with the grandmother. The court acted properly in making its ruling.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. No costs are awarded.

CROCKETT, WILKINS and HALL, JJ., concur.

MAUGHAN, J., concurs in the result.

1

. *Wilson v. Family Services,*Utah, 554 P.2d 227 (1976).
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 976 

To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the Medicare exception 

to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for hospitals, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2015 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. WOMACK, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. SALMON, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. ROKITA, Mr. 

YOUNG of Indiana, Ms. JENKINS of Kansas, Mr. POMPEO, Mrs. 

ELLMERS, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. COLE, Mr. BARTON, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. CARTER of Texas, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. FLORES, Mr. 

MARCHANT, Mr. OLSON, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. CARSON

of Indiana, Mr. HINOJOSA, Ms. JACKSON LEE, and Mr. GOSAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the 

Medicare exception to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for hospitals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 976 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patient Access to 

3 Higher Quality Health Care Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE REFORM PROVISIONS 

5 LIMITING MEDICARE EXCEPTION TO THE 

6 PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN PHYSICIAN RE7 FERRALS FOR HOSPITALS. 

8 Sections 6001 and 10601 of the Patient Protection 

9 and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148; 124 Stat. 

10 684, 1005) and section 1106 of the Health Care and Edu11 cation Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152; 

12 124 Stat. 1049) are repealed and the provisions of law 

13 amended by such sections are restored as if such sections 

14 had never been enacted. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 871 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 871

To amend title 18, United States Code, to direct the Bureau of Prisons 
 to provide certain voting information to Federal prisoners upon their 
                          release from prison.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2015

Mr. Jeffries (for himself and Ms. Meng) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to direct the Bureau of Prisons 
 to provide certain voting information to Federal prisoners upon their 
                          release from prison.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Formerly Incarcerated Voter 
Registration Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF VOTING INFORMATION TO FEDERAL PRISONERS.

    Section 4042(a)(E) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
                            ``(viii) The laws and regulations governing 
                        the right of an individual convicted of a 
                        felony who has been released from prison to 
                        vote in each State, and, for the State in which 
                        the prisoner will reside upon release, any 
                        voter registration or application forms that 
                        the prisoner will need to complete in order to 
                        vote. For purposes of this clause, the term 
                        `State' includes the District of Columbia, the 
                        Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, 
                        Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, and the 
                        Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
                        Islands.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016202EN.01016301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/163 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/163

---

Article 266

(ex Article 233 TEC)

(ex Article 233 TEC)

The institution, body, office or entity whose act has been declared void or whose failure to act has been declared contrary to the Treaties shall be required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

This obligation shall not affect any obligation which may result from the application of the second paragraph of Article 340.

---
p.1 

OAR Box 1170 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

91) F. R. November 19, 1990 

Docket Number: 

A-88-24 

Printed 4/30/2008 10:49:06 AM Sheet 91 of 182 
P.2 

48208 

Corrections 

/t.rt'W 

Federal Register 

Vol. 55, No. 223 

Monday, November 19, 1990 

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER 

contains editorial corrections of previously 

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed 

Rule, and Notice documents. These 

corrections are prepared by the Office of 

the Federal Register. Agency prepared 

corrections are issued as signed 

documents and appear in the appropriate 

document categories elsewhere in the 

issue. 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Animal and Plant Health Inspection 

Service 

9 CFR Part 301 

[Docket No. 90-114] 

RIN 0579-AA29 

Citrus Canker 

Correction 

In rule document 90-21351 beginning 

on page 37442 in the issue of Tuesday, 

September 11,1990, make the following 

correction: 

On page 37450, in the third column, 

§ 301.75-2(c) should read as follows: 

§301.75-2 [Corrected] 

**** * 

(c) Regulated articles moved interstate 

with a limited permit to an area of the 

United States that is not a commercial 

citrus-producing area may not 

subsequently be moved interstate into 

any commercial citrus-producing area. 

BILLING CODE 1505-01-0 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 60 

IAD-FRL-3848-2] 

Standards of Performance for New 

Stationary Sources; Test Methods in 

Appendix A and Performance 

Specifications in Appendix B; 

Technical Amendment 

Correction 

In rule document 90-24498 beginning 

on page 47471 in the issue of 

Wednesday, November 14,1990, make 

the following correction: 

On page 47473, in the first column, in 

the fifth line, the second "5A" should 

read "5A°". 

BILLING CODE 1505-01-0
### Table 1. Surface Characteristics Around Redding Airport Meteorological Station

AERSURFACE

Sector Albedo Bowen

Ratio Surface

Roughness

Length

(meters) Albedo Bowen

Ratio Surface

Roughness

Length

(meters)

Winter Spring

1 0.52 0.48 0.37 0.16 0.51 0.64

2 0.52 0.48 0.205 0.16 0.51 0.452

3 0.52 0.48 0.205 0.16 0.51 0.456

4 0.52 0.48 0.052 0.16 0.51 0.17

5 0.52 0.48 0.027 0.16 0.51 0.112

6 0.52 0.48 0.019 0.16 0.51 0.101

7 0.52 0.48 0.008 0.16 0.51 0.047

8 0.52 0.48 0.008 0.16 0.51 0.035

9 0.52 0.48 0.008 0.16 0.51 0.037

10 0.52 0.48 0.007 0.16 0.51 0.048

11 0.52 0.48 0.006 0.16 0.51 0.05

12 0.52 0.48 0.094 0.16 0.51 0.242

Summer Fall

1 0.17 0.61 0.776 0.17 0.9 0.776

2 0.17 0.61 0.62 0.17 0.9 0.62

3 0.17 0.61 0.592 0.17 0.9 0.592

4 0.17 0.61 0.303 0.17 0.9 0.303

5 0.17 0.61 0.22 0.17 0.9 0.22

6 0.17 0.61 0.184 0.17 0.9 0.184

7 0.17 0.61 0.127 0.17 0.9 0.127

8 0.17 0.61 0.134 0.17 0.9 0.134

9 0.17 0.61 0.128 0.17 0.9 0.128

10 0.17 0.61 0.12 0.17 0.9 0.12

11 0.17 0.61 0.109 0.17 0.9 0.109

12 0.17 0.61 0.401 0.17 0.9 0.401

### Table 2. Surface Characteristics Around SPI

- Anderson Facility

AERSURFACE

Sector Albedo Bowen

Ratio Surface

Roughness

Length

(meters) Albedo Bowen

Ratio Surface

Roughness

Length

(meters)

Winter Spring

1 0.51 0.48 0.043 0.16 0.52 0.113

2 0.51 0.48 0.043 0.16 0.52 0.097

3 0.51 0.48 0.037 0.16 0.52 0.092

4 0.51 0.48 0.034 0.16 0.52 0.081

5 0.51 0.48 0.026 0.16 0.52 0.101

6 0.51 0.48 0.024 0.16 0.52 0.105

7 0.51 0.48 0.09 0.16 0.52 0.22

8 0.51 0.48 0.166 0.16 0.52 0.282

9 0.51 0.48 0.017 0.16 0.52 0.064

10 0.51 0.48 0.01 0.16 0.52 0.052

11 0.51 0.48 0.015 0.16 0.52 0.045

12 0.51 0.48 0.009 0.16 0.52 0.046

Summer Fall

1 0.17 0.55 0.154 0.17 0.89 0.154

2 0.17 0.55 0.128 0.17 0.89 0.128

3 0.17 0.55 0.123 0.17 0.89 0.123

4 0.17 0.55 0.112 0.17 0.89 0.112

5 0.17 0.55 0.171 0.17 0.89 0.171

6 0.17 0.55 0.168 0.17 0.89 0.168

7 0.17 0.55 0.295 0.17 0.89 0.295

8 0.17 0.55 0.393 0.17 0.89 0.393

9 0.17 0.55 0.139 0.17 0.89 0.139

10 0.17 0.55 0.116 0.17 0.89 0.116

11 0.17 0.55 0.143 0.17 0.89 0.143

12 0.17 0.55 0.1 0.17 0.89 0.1Figure 1. Landuse Data Used to Develop Surface Characteristics for Redding AirportFigure 2. Landuse Data Used to Develop Surface Characteristics for SPI

- AndersonFigure 3. Receptor Locations

– Standard DomainFigure 4. Receptor Locations

– Expanded Domain for 1

- Hour Average NO 2 Modeling
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 100th District Court of Collingsworth County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on December 9,

2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Ernest Glenn Benton v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-13-00150-CR Trial Court Number: 2879

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated December 9, 2014, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on April 21, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
HeinOnline -- 64 Fed. Reg. 56470 1999
#### Hunt v. First Ins. Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.

16515

5/24/96

Granted

- Hawai'i -, - P.2d -
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00925-CR

Style: Ex parte Terry Lynn Spies

Date motion filed*: April 13, 2015

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file appellate brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: None

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested: None

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 30 days from the date of this order

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

 Denied

 Dismissed (moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellant’s brief is due to filed no later than 30 days from the date of this order. No further extensions will be 

granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.2. 

Judge’s signature: /S/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting for the Court 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: April 21, 2015
LASERSIGHT INCORPORATED

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                    Certifications of Chief Executive Officer
  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

      Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as created  by Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  LaserSight
Incorporated (the "Company") does hereby certify that:

      1. The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the  quarterly
      period  ended  June  30,  2005  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
      requirements  of Section 13(a) or Section  15(d),  as  applicable,  of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



                                               /S/ Danghui ("David") Liu
Dated: August 5, 2005
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                                    Danghui ("David") Liu,
                                                     Chief Executive Officer




      The  certifications  set forth  above are being  furnished  as an  exhibit
solely  pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United  States
Code,  and shall not be deemed to be "filed"  for  purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  nor  shall  they  be  deemed
incorporated  by reference in any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1934,  as
amended.

      A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 1350, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement required by Section 1350, has been provided to LaserSight Incorporated
and will be retained by LaserSight  Incorporated and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Charles I. Talbot , Chief Financial Officer of Chaparral Resources, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
     2005 ("Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. All of the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
     of the Company.



Date: March 17, 2006                        /s/ Charles I. Talbot
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Charles I. Talbot
                                            Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**  ***CERTIFICATIONS***
I, Brian E. Dearing, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report.       Date: March 17, 2005 By: /s/ Brian E. Dearing        By: Brian E. Dearing   Title: Chairman, President and CEO  
This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.
**Exhibit 23.1a**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Board of Directors

Cagle’s, Inc. andSubsidiary

Atlanta, Georgia

 

We consent to theinclusion of our report dated May 27, 2010, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Cagle’s, Inc. and Subsidiary as of April 3,2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and schedule, which report hasbeen included in the Annual Report to Stockholders and in the Form 10-KAnnual Report of Cagle’s, Inc. and Subsidiary.

 

 

/s/FRAZER FROST,LLP

Certified PublicAccountants

 

 

Little Rock, Arkansas

June 10, 2010

 

----
<Page>
                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus and Statement of Additional
Information constituting part of this Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to the
registration statement (Form N-4 No. 33-63935) (the "Registration Statement")
of our report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements
of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in such Prospectus and
Statement of Additional Information. We also consent to the use in the
Statement of Additional Information constituting part of this Registration
Statement of our report dated April 6, 2001, relating to the financial
statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D, which
appears in such Statement of Additional Information. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Independent Public Accountants" in such
Statement of Additional Information.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 17, 2002
P. 1



# OAR Box 1778 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 35 ) ll-B-1 0 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/2008 9:50:53 AM Sheet 35 of 276P. 2

> * ENVIRONMENTA L 

# A

fff l ft. 5

II-B-1 0 

### OC T 3 131

3

MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT* . FROM : PSD-Routin e Maintenanc e Repai r an d Replacemen t -"-

• Directo r Divisio nof . Stationary Sourc e Enforcemen t

- i O r .Howar

d G . Bergman

, Directo r Enforcemen t Divisio n(6AE ) Regio n V I Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r mem o o f Septembe r 15 , 1379 r requesting an interpretatio no f the ter m "routin e mainte nance , repai r an

d replacement' ' a s i t i s used in 552.21(b ) (2)(i) . i

n particula r yo

u reques t guidanc e o n wha t shoul d b

e considere d routin e replacement . Routin e replace men t mean s th

e routin e replacemen t o f parts , withi nthe limitation s o f reconstruction , an d woul d no t includ e th e replacemen t o f an entir e facilit y (i.e. , anol d heate r a t a petrochemica l plan t whic hha s ended it s norma l usefu l life ) I f you hav e an y furthe r questions , Dleas e contac t Libb y Scopin o a t FT S 755-2564 .

cc : Mik e Trutn a Pete r Wvckof f bcc : D
. Rochlin

. L . ScopindDSSE:EN-341:LScoipino:ncb:10/2/7 8 dwar dEjy Reich

. - FIL E C_DATS :

9 i cr. — P_3
_ 

### 5 197 9 J/UBJECT : 

### interpretatio no f 4 0 CF R52.2 1 (b)(2)(i) , Exemptio nFro m Being •I a Majo r Modificatio n FR0M! 

### . ' Howard" ^ Bergma n / TO : 

### Directo r Enforcemen t Divisio n(6AE ) Edwar dE . Reic h Director , Stationar y

Sourc e Enforcemen t Divisio n(EN-341 ) Sectio n52.21(b)(2)(i ) state s " a physica l chang e shal l no t includ e rou tin e maintenanc e repai r an dreplacement. " W e hav e receive da questio n fro m Coasta l State s Petrochemica l Company , CorpustChristi- , Texas , i f replacemen t i nthi s sectio nwoul dinclud e th e replacemen t o f a facilit y afte r i t ha s ende dit s norma l usefu l life . I nothe r word s woul dre placin g anol dheate r wit ha new heate r b e considere da routin e replace men t and , therefore , exemp t fro m PS Dreview . We hav e receive dconflictin g verba l interpretation s from you r staff . W

e suppor t th e lates t interpretatio nw e receive dtha t thi s sectio nonl y exempt s routin e replacemen t o f parts . W e reques t th e interpretatio nb e provide du s i nwriting .

F P A FQP - 1320- S 'RE V 3-76 1