alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 135 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 135

Encouraging people in the United States to recognize March 2, 2015, as 
                        Read Across America Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2015

Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself and Mrs. Davis of California) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                     on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Encouraging people in the United States to recognize March 2, 2015, as 
                        Read Across America Day.

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education and professional 
        success, and is a source of pleasure throughout life;
Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read if the United 
        States is to remain competitive in the global economy;
Whereas Congress has placed great emphasis on reading intervention and providing 
        additional resources for reading assistance, including through the 
        programs authorized by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
        1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) and through annual appropriations for 
        library and literacy programs; and
Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned about reading and 
        education have joined with the National Education Association (NEA) to 
        use March 2 to celebrate reading and the birth of Theodor Geisel, also 
        known as Dr. Seuss: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. Seuss, for his 
        success in encouraging children to discover the joy of reading;
            (2) honors the 18th anniversary of Read Across America Day;
            (3) encourages parents to read with their children for at 
        least 30 minutes on Read Across America Day in honor of the 
        commitment of the House of Representatives to building a Nation 
        of readers; and
            (4) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        Read Across America Day with appropriate ceremonies and 
        activities.
                                 <all>
```
September 28, 2007

26718

#### Borges v. Department of Water Supply of County of Hawai'i

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Paul Genova, President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Periodic Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

| | /s/ Paul Genova                         
| | ----------------------------------------
| | Paul
      Genova                       
| | President, Chief
      Financial Officer
| | May 11,
      2007                      

The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 959 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 959

    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
     resource study of the Medgar Evers House, located in Jackson, 
                  Mississippi, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2015

 Mr. Thompson of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
     resource study of the Medgar Evers House, located in Jackson, 
                  Mississippi, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medgar Evers House Study Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a special 
resource study of the home of the late civil rights activist Medgar 
Evers, located at 2332 Margaret Walker Alexander Drive in Jackson, 
Mississippi.
    (b) Contents.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) evaluate the national significance of the site;
            (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 
        designating the site as a unit of the National Park System;
            (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 
        protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, State, 
        or local governmental entities, or private and nonprofit 
        organizations;
            (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or local 
        governmental entities, private and nonprofit organizations or 
        any other interested individuals; and
            (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal acquisition, 
        development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance 
        associated with the alternatives.
    (c) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
be conducted in accordance with section 100507 of title 54, United 
States Code.
    (d) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds 
are first made available for the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate a report containing the results of the study 
and any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
#### Miller v. GMP Associates, Inc.

23041

07/31/2001

Affirmed in part, Vacated and Remanded
<PAGE>   1


                                   Exhibit 11

                       CAPITAL INVESTMENT OF HAWAII, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                      Computation of Loss Per Common Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  YEARS ENDED JULY 31,
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         1997           1996          1995           1994           1993
                                                     ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   -----------
<S>                                                  <C>                <C>           <C>            <C>              <C>   

      Loss from continuing operations                $  (420,934)       (17,033)      (247,298)      (514,690)        62,653

      Discontinued operations                           (426,050)      (356,325)      (560,628)      (908,763)    (1,083,432)
                                                     -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

              Net loss applicable to common          
               shareholders                          $  (846,984)      (373,358)      (807,926)    (1,423,453)    (1,020,779)
                                                     ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

      Divided by weighted average number of common
         shares outstanding during the year            1,032,683      1,032,683      1,032,683      1,032,683      1,032,683
                                                     ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

      Loss per common share:
         Continuing operations                              (.41)          (.02)          (.24)          (.50)           .06
         Discontinued operations                            (.41)          (.34)          (.54)          (.88)         (1.05)
                                                     -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

              Net loss                                      (.82)          (.36)          (.78)         (1.38)          (.99)
                                                     ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
</TABLE>
Opinion issued August 20, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00343-CV

———————————

RHR PARTNERS, LLC, Appellant

V.

THE ARENA GROUP, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2013-25166

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, RHR Partners, LLC, has neither paid the required fees nor 

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; 

see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 

2013), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the 
2

Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial 

Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 

2013). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for 

preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that 

this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and 

for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd.
Exhibit (21)

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Subsidiaries of the Company:



|                                         |  |               |                     | 
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ------------------- | 
|                                         |  | Place of      |                    
|Names of
Subsidiary(1)                   |  | Incorporation |                    
|Flagg Bros. of Puerto Rico, Inc.         |  |               | Delaware            | 
|Genesco Brands, Inc.                     |  |               | Delaware            | 
|GVI, Inc.                                |  |               | Delaware            | 
|Hat World Corporation                    |  |               | Delaware            | 
|GCO Canada Inc.                          |  |               | Canada              | 
|Hat World, Inc.                          |  |               | Minnesota           | 
|Hat World Services, Inc.                 |  |               | Delaware            | 
|Keuka Footwear, Inc.                     |  |               | Delaware            | 
|SIOPA Sports of America, LLC (50% owned) |  |               | Delaware            | 
|Genesco (UK) Limited                     |  |               | United Kingdom      | 
|Schuh Group Limited                      |  |               | United Kingdom      | 
|Schuh (Holdings) Limited                 |  |               | United Kingdom      | 
|Schuh Limited                            |  |               | United Kingdom      | 
|Schuh (ROI) Limited                      |  |               | Republic of Ireland | 
|Genesco GP, LLC                          |  |               | United Kingdom      | 
|Genesco Scot LP                          |  |               | United Kingdom      | 
|Genesco (Jersey) Limited                 |  |               | New Jersey          | 



|(1) | Except as otherwise indicated, 100% of the equity of each listed subsidiary is owned either by the registrant or by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      10,384,291
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,966,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,350,416
<PP&E>                                      90,432,445
<DEPRECIATION>                              32,228,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,556,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,301,538
<BONDS>                                     29,594,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,660,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,556,092
<SALES>                                      4,759,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,875,758
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,502,402
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             654,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                718,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            718,364
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   718,364
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
810-100311-017 

£ t 

CITY OF KILLEE N 

AVIATION SERVICES 

uary26, 2010 

1 :^' 1 lonorable F^aymond fl. Lallood 

S.\: clary 

1. S. Department of Transportation 

1 ! New Jersey Ave., SH 

^ ;i:.:iington, DC 20590 

1 .1 ctD0T-0ST-2Q10-0034 SOiQ^OOS ^ 

I •• • I! VIr. Secretary: 

I ,k you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for antitnist 

i iiiity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan 

/ ios. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for the oneworld 

: cc to compete ctTectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliances. This increased 

II I ; :icc competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies 

1 :• - first by solidifying U.S. - Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for 

i r liberalization across .Asia. 

; ihorough review, i encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this 

1. niioii as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to 

t' r highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will 

1 I positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and 

j^ j; options and will help to ensure that custotners continue to benefit from the 

t. lition afforded by three competitive air alliances. 

I • ;. oLi to quickly approve this application. 

uitton 

r of .Aviation 

AR CRKi-K f?OAD. l)ox O- KILLEEN-..TEXAS 7GEi49-2557 . P.54.56! .6100- 254.501.8744FAX 

V,'','.'Vy C/ KtLLLLN IX US
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ARI Network Services, Inc. (the “Company”); |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Brian E. Dearing                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian E. Dearing                                          |
|   | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the Board |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6312

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LUIS RAUL DIAZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CR-00-113)

Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luis Raul Diaz, Appellant Pro Se. Sonya LeGene Sacks, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Luis Raul Diaz appeals from the district court’s orders

denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing, on the grounds that

the Government should have filed a motion for the reduction of his

sentence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b), and denying his motion to

reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Diaz,

No. CR-00-113 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 7, 2002 & entered Dec. 10, 2001;

filed Dec. 20, 2000 & entered Dec. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
November 23, 1998

21280, 21281

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
EXHIBIT (24) 21

                                   CERTIFICATE

         I, Martha Murray,  Secretary of West Texas Utilities  Company,  a Texas
corporation  (the  "Corporation"),  hereby  certify  that set  forth  below is a
complete  and  accurate  copy of a certain  resolution  adopted  by the Board of
Directors of the  Corporation  on this 26th day of January,  1999, and that such
resolution is in full force and effect as of the date of this certificate.


                          West Texas Utilities Company
                          Board of Directors Resolution
                                January 26, 1999

         RESOLVED,  that each officer of West Texas Utilities  Company listed at
the end of this sentence is hereby  authorized to make,  constitute and appoint,
in his respective capacity, a power of attorney in favor of the person(s) listed
directly  after  his name at the end of this  sentence,  as his true and  lawful
attorney(s)-in-fact and agent(s), with full power and authority (and in the case
of more  than one  attorney-in-fact,  each  attorney-in-fact  acting  alone  and
without the other) to execute in the name and on behalf of the  officer,  in any
and all capacities,  the  Corporation's  Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1998 and
any and all amendments thereto, to be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended,  and any other documents and instruments  incidental  thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits  thereto and all documents in connection
therewith,  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  and  grant to such
attorney(s)-in-fact,   and   agent(s)   (and  in  the  case  of  more  than  one
attorney-in-fact,  each of them),  full power and authority of substitution  and
revocation  in the premises and full power and  authority to do and perform each
and every  act and thing  requisite  and  necessary  to be done in and about the
premises, as fully and all intents and purposes as the officer might or could do
in person.
1. Paul J. Brower is authorized to make, constitute and appoint R. Russell Davis
   to be his attorney[s]-in-fact.
2. R. Russell Davis is authorized to make, constitute and appoint Paul J. Brower
   to be his attorney[s]-in-fact.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of
West Texas Utilities Company this day, the 26th of January, 1999.



         /s/ Martha Murray
             Martha Murray
             Corporate Secretary


         COMPANY SEAL
AFL-CIO

August 25, 2014

Mr. Anthony Foxx, Secretary

United States Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Secretary Foxx:

On behalf of the 110 affiliates and 65,000 members of the San Mateo County Central Labor 

Council, which includes the working men and women of the San Francisco International Airport, 

I write to express our vehement opposition to Norwegian Air International’s (NAI) application for 

a foreign air carrier permit. Should the application be allowed to go forward, it will set a 

dangerous precedent for employment practices for all carriers.

The business model used by NAI allows companies to register in a different country to avoid the 

regulations, taxes and labor standards of their own. Acceptance of NAI’s application, and by 

extension condoning the carrier’s practice of offshoring work to reduce industry standards, 

circumventing labor rights, and undermining oversight for health and safety, will have far 

reaching implications for all aspects of the global aviation industry. 

Additionally, the Bay Area has some of the highest costs of living in the Nation. The race to the 

bottom by any employer results in more families in poverty, more tax burdens on the public who 

foot the bill for safety net services, and the consequence of high employee turnover which 

undermines a stable workforce environment of dedicated employees.

We hope that the United States will not sanction this degradation of labor practices. Therefore we 

urge the denial of NAI’s application. Thank you for your consideration. 

Respectfully,

Shelley Kessler

Shelley Kessler

Executive Secretary Treasurer

San Mateo County Central Labor Council

Vice-President, California Labor Federation

opeiu 3 AFL-CIO 174