alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
The Declaration of Independence, 1776
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

In June 1776 five delegates to the Second Continental Congress drafted the Declaration of Independence. The mural depicts (from left to right) Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, Thomas Jefferson, Robert Livingston, and John Adams. On the wall in the background is a portrait of English philosopher John Locke, whose Second Essay on Government argued that the rights of man include the right of revolution.

**Left:** American naval officer John Paul Jones hoists the Continental Colors, the first national United States flag.

**Right:** George Washington is shown in a British officer's uniform, which he wore on a 1753 mission to challenge French troops along the Ohio River.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The central east-west corridor is referred to as the Great Experiment Hall because it chronicles in 16 murals the legislative milestones of three centuries, from the signing of the Mayflower Compact in 1629 to the enactment of women's suffrage in 1920. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeAbout UsPartnerships & Recognition
Memberships & Affiliations
Architect of the Capitol (AOC) has a history of partnering with nationally recognized leaders to craft and adopt best practices to be used in the care and creation of the nation's Capitol.
        
                  Our unique portfolio of responsibilities creates models for other communities of practice. AOC is committed to being professionals and leaders in our respective arts continuing, establishing and evolving techniques and processes in our fields. A sampling of these partners is below.

Image
			Image
			ImageImage
			Image
			ImageImage
			Image
			ImageImage
			Image
			ImageImage
			Image
			ImageImage
			Image Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of infoUSA Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that to thebest of my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.Date: May 9, 2006         */s/ Stormy L. Dean*   Stormy L. Dean,   Chief Financial Officer
\--Wr S\r or (Tw\^VYY\

lQcq<

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS 1^L£ourtofA£g€afs:Dfstnct

apr rr 2015

0 ~fcc

Mtonj

"X \QO^ \\Vjfc "Vo -•^Wg^lb^K^ERK-

^aoucA Vjc\—Ck—A \mE.\vi tnovAA if* * yV&nS Vut -"**«-'- - y- •••*—— „^„^—^v T ' - ""—

Jajc*& V)r\n3 A- o_-AW^ Cc^ky^x^av^ fr£ A\>jl Cs^rA

*\<z$$LL\^\\^

S>ibvY\\w^

^S>

fi^Q /v %ou>erS \<\&ZU I'd

Qj ^m 2yy\ f %yA tA^yV

Wu^wi \\i /T<^^ _OTilQ.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 December 1, 2005 Before Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge No. 04-3948 CHARISE PEPPER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. VILLAGE OF OAK PARK and LEONARD DONAIRE,

Defendants-Appellees
. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 02 C 3890 Rebecca R. Pallmeyer, Judge
.
O R D E R The opinion of this court issued on November 30, 2005, is amended as follows: On page 8, line 11, the citation should reflect 506 U.S. 56 (1992).
Page 1 of 2

ePACA Portal - First Time Users for License Renewals or Reinstatements

If you’ve never logged in to the ePACA Portal, you will first need to get a USDA eAuthentication 

account.

Go to: https://www.eauth.usda.gov/eauth/b/usda/registration

• Choose “Customer”, Click “Continue” button, follow the instructions to submit the required

information (email);

• You will receive an e-mail to activate your eAuth account. Once you’ve activated your

eAuth account, you can login to the ePACA Portal with your username and password.

Current (or Previous) PACA

Licensees

1. Obtain your ePACA ID

Thisis a 6-digit number assigned 

by the ePACA system.

The ePACA ID is NOT your PACA 

license number.

For businesses for which PACA has an email address on file, you will receive a 

renewal notification email 45 days prior to your PACA license anniversary date. 

This email provides the online renewal instructions and your ePACA ID.

If you have not received your ePACA ID by email, please contact the National 

License Center at (800) 495-PACA (7222), Option 1.

Or send an email to: PACALicense@usda.gov to request your ePACA ID. 

Include in your email:

• Business name on your current or previouslicense

• PACA license number

• Your email address that you used for the eAuthentication account

2. Login to the USDA

eAuthentication page by

entering your User ID and

password, and clicking on the

LOGIN button.

**Use the Google Chrome web 

browser when using the ePACA 

Portal.

If you do not have Chrome on your

computer, you can download it 

here: https://www.google.com/chrome/

Go to the ePACA Portal website at this link: https://apps.mrp.usda.gov/epaca
Page 2 of 2

3. Enter your ePACA ID

4. You will then be brought to your ePACA Portal business page, where you can access online services to renew

your license or file a complaint.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply568Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  David Linn (no... (not verified)PermalinkJuly 28, 2017 - 9:36amHi Franklin, great article.  Interesting how people were suspicious of the new electricity in the 1880s and felt gas was safer.  I love the pictures, especially the Voting Display Board.  Thank you, Franklin.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2016202EN.01018801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/188 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/188

---

Article 325

(ex Article 280 TEC)

(ex Article 280 TEC)

1.   The Union and the Member States shall counter fraud and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union through measures to be taken in accordance with this Article, which shall act as a deterrent and be such as to afford effective protection in the Member States, and in all the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies.

2.   Member States shall take the same measures to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union as they take to counter fraud affecting their own financial interests.

3.   Without prejudice to other provisions of the Treaties, the Member States shall coordinate their action aimed at protecting the financial interests of the Union against fraud. To this end they shall organise, together with the Commission, close and regular cooperation between the competent authorities.

4.   The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, after consulting the Court of Auditors, shall adopt the necessary measures in the fields of the prevention of and fight against fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union with a view to affording effective and equivalent protection in the Member States and in all the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies.

5.   The Commission, in cooperation with Member States, shall each year submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the measures taken for the implementation of this Article.

---
.

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

E, or t?lactEt0 carretttuLl

### tsrat1an

Of gubli0 pm8 Constltutlaa rimaxra pray wl;i.ch

58 privlitalyomxid srntlitae: ,rtlclc 7138, Li;octlai: 4, grwldea t.hnt"A.1 pmprty bclon&,q to tbr,32itis3Ytatea shull

, but the statutss nowhere attmpt to property wh;hPch

Ls ~>r~:viitely

~'mcd, ltcd stat68 Qx?a lodurnl i3,genoy.mchl.ag '%Pthe tk;:taustatas sxcrlptsIxlCh-propsporty fX'oa taxation by ?30 etata and cotxaty.

-met pivate property 15 used exalwlvoly far public pr?caerr do&m 113%c!mi@3 tl32mturs oi tho property OF the tftle tharuto 80 AS to oomort. ~0s. Ceo. H. Shwp,gard, rage e

it into publio prapertp.m It may be urged that the rental rcqulred to be paid by aorkse~rogrees AdEdnistration ~111 be more with the st~t.e l ad OouatYf=X% the property than it wauld be otherwise. xi so, the burden lefd on the yedoral Covexnmnt USat nmt only~an indirect Oneandnot such as to forbid the levy and colleatlon of such tams. In the aass or Jones ~8. EZUVOi2onstruotlon co., 302 D. S. 134, opinion by Chief Justice Ewhes, it was held that an oacupation tax measured **by ~08s**  **income is**  not invalid where inposed by a state upon a contraator with the United States as laying a direct burden on the Federal Gaymamt,~ even though the kqosition of the tax nay lnarease the cost to the. goverumnt of the work oontraoted to be done.

Ftllure to tax th$s property would be to violato AZ- %? 8, Ssotlon 1, of the Constltutltn of Texas, provldlly :

_

.. 

### aTexstfon shall be e~$ml and uulfora, All

prcqWty in #lo St&c, whether mmed by natu- ,ral persons or corporetlons athoe than munioipal, shall be taxed in proportion to its value .whiah shrill be asaertalned as maybe provided by law.” The properties mentioned in said questions are subjeot to tax bythe county andstate and both of ’ your guestiohS are answered in the negative. Correspondence attached te your Pequest Fould Indicate that there maybe scn38o_ue8tlonas to nhether Works irogrose i,duiniistretion is r,ayiug any rental on one piece or this property, or is receiving the use or It @aus. .‘a maybe Gathered framv&at we huve already said, that is an &material oohslderatlor. ‘I?:eproperty is none the less privately owned, Your0 very truly
Agricultural Marketing Service

Update

NOSB-NOP-EPA Working Group

on Inert Ingredients

National Organic Standards Board Meeting

November 29, 2011

Savannah, Georgia
Agricultural Marketing Service

Working Group on Inert Ingredients

• NOP: Emily Brown Rosen, Lisa Brines 

• EPA: Chris Pfeifer (BPPD), Kerry Leifer

(Registration Division, Inerts)

• NOSB: Jay Feldman, Tracy Miedema, Jeff 

Moyer (ex officio)
Agricultural Marketing Service

Background

• OFPA permits synthetic inerts in pesticides that are 

“not classed by EPA as inerts of toxicological 

concern”

• NOP rule

– Synthetic inert ingredients classified as List 4a and 4b by 

EPA are allowed in pesticides for organic use.

– List 3 inerts are allowed in passive pheromone 

dispensers.
Agricultural Marketing Service

Issue

• EPA revised system of assessment in 2006, 

no longer uses Lists 1-4 

• NOP is operating with obsolete list of inerts, 

dated August 2004

• Manufacturers are petitioning for use of 

inerts that do not appear on the old Lists
Agricultural Marketing Service

Goals

• WG recommend a proposal to NOSB

• NOSB develop a formal recommendation 

for NOP 

• NOP complete rulemaking no later than 

October 2017, next sunset date for List 4
Agricultural Marketing Service

EPA Now

• EPA currently lists tolerances or exemptions 

for pesticide residues and inert ingredients at 

40 CFR Part 180

• EPA also classes some inerts as permitted for 

use in Minimal Risk products– FIFRA 25(b) 

(includes most former 4a’s)
Agricultural Marketing Service

Number of List 4 Inerts in Use 

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Old List 4 List 4s In

Use

25b in use Not on

25b, in

use

4b

4a
Agricultural Marketing Service

Some options considered

• See Inerts Ingredients Discussion Document

– Wide range of options

• Comments were submitted to Crops 

Committee
Agricultural Marketing Service

205.601 (m)(2) EPA List 3 Inerts of unknown toxicity allowed:

(ii) Inerts used in passive pheromone dispensers.

• The allowance for EPA List 3 inerts is scheduled to 

sunset in 2013

• NOSB to vote on EPA List 3 in spring 2012

• 9 substances on former List 3 known to be in use, 

including 4 synthetic 

• Various options proposed
Agricultural Marketing Service

Next steps

• Working group to review comments and 

send proposal to Crops Committee

• Crops Committee develops proposal for full 

board

• Public comments
Agricultural Marketing Service

Next steps

• NOSB makes a final recommendation

• NOP initiates rulemaking

• More public comments

• Final rule published

• Implementation can be phased in to allow 

time for changes in products, petitions.
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 984 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the 

Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study on the 

feasibility of designating the Chief Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 984 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HISTORIC 

2 TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY. 

3 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(46) CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HIS7 TORIC TRAIL.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Chief Standing 

9 Bear Trail, extending approximately 550 miles 

10 from Niobrara, Nebraska, to Ponca City, Okla11 homa, which follows the route taken by Chief 

12 Standing Bear and the Ponca people during 

13 Federal Indian removal, and approximately 550 

14 miles from Ponca City, Oklahoma, through 

15 Omaha, Nebraska, to Niobrara, Nebraska, 

16 which follows the return route taken by Chief 

17 Standing Bear and the Ponca people, as gen18 erally depicted on the map entitled ‘Chief 

19 Standing Bear National Historic Trail Feasi20 bility Study’, numbered 903/125,630, and dated 

21 November 2014. 

22 ‘‘(B) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map 

23 described in subparagraph (A) shall be on file 

24 and available for public inspection in the appro25 priate offices of the Department of the Interior. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 984 RFS 

1 ‘‘(C) COMPONENTS.—The feasibility study 

2 conducted under subparagraph (A) shall include 

3 a determination on whether the Chief Standing 

4 Bear Trail meets the criteria described in sub5 section (b) for designation as a national historic 

6 trail. 

7 ‘‘(D) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting 

8 the feasibility study under subparagraph (A), 

9 the Secretary of the Interior shall consider 

10 input from owners of private land within or ad11 jacent to the study area.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
£

(Jttpfhf SMpc>

floS^'fd Ay*5 7T7//

5DtQ8U-cU

71)0$363 7/

&/Gffa 3&9 Mem

^Geefi j#c£ ^XtS 763t>J

kZ' OtO^/Jd. C-^n-D)DH0)'OLcf*7S6S-C

'Dene- C/etf.

Ceoli yoa- &)•€&£>£- /W^x/exed...

•fo Api\L.*id'.tf0'7. 7hi/?/~c*oc^ -fkc yeo>£ Ae.

APR Ofi 2015

\A
- ,. J J2oo*ot

J7)p &„*-!•,AjM»jJ 1/klMif Of His /m/JjoJ Cxmmd

TD WmmiE JUmEOFSMD COURT:

Vft(7**J 0/u'rl EpfLiloZ] 4+ ?/o/ /w3&?Mtfli, J^ecv* ffitk

7kx#± 7&>3b7t

ftSuj, fhe Code 0$ C/f&ttwl Mocedune 5*% **>• AKT //, N ftLCjunes

ft Cdqu q{ Covytcfio*) fl/oj SeAt/eMe. fecoul' Qotd QiieL fo && M0$c

€<i -b ffff/fttud MO7 /?0>/h#//o*. Mow /iffihc#*jfr e^jutuoi Gm#/h

ihie. /ec&tJS /ft ?Ao

fctiubloth fedoA-lIfiiofMSC *wd^SlxklhufttTC.fi

Civi/ hnchce ^Ktmdtes CWc $132,001-JJ2 003)

0f m\o*iSfttjt*Swim himt,m4•&**£<& £&cdd oaj .fatch[m %>&

l&J#fjL?£iZA
21 APRIL 2015

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 West Front Street

Suite 354

Tyler, TX 75702

Re: Lee Vincent v. State

12-15-00019-CR

Ms. Lusk:

Attached, please find a copy of the letter sent to my client regarding the opinion issued by the 

Court and the right to file a PDR.

If there is anything else I need to do, please let me know. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Austin Reeve Jackson

27 MARCH 2015

Mr. Lee Vincent

Inmate: 01978797

Gurney Unit

1385 FM 3328

Palestine, TX 75803 

Re: Opinion

 

Mr. Vincent

Please find enclosed a copy of opinion issued by the Twelfth Court of Appeals in your case. The 

Court has affirmed your conviction.

Should you desire to do so, you do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary 

Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. If you decide to pursue that option you must file your 

petition prior to the expiration of thirty days from the date of the court’s opinion. That is by, 24 

April 2015. 

I would be happy to address any questions or concerns you have if you will simply let me know. 

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
#### Tuxedo Park Association, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Benjamin Dembeck et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

April 2, 1959.

*Goldstein, Judd $ Gurfein (Orrin G. Judd*and *Harold J. Reynolds*of counsel), for appellant.

*Abraham Epstein*for respondents.

*943
      *Per Curiam.*

The covenants in the deed to the defendants ran with the land and subjected defendants to a personal judgment for the services rendered by plaintiff pursuant to the covenants. The defendants are also liable for the cost of those additional services, particularly police and fire protection and sewage disposal, which were not covered by the covenants but which were performed by the plaintiff for the benefit of all property owners. The cost of plaintiff’s assessments and charges were fair and reasonable and consistent with the intention of the covenants.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff against the defendant Benjamin Dembeck in the amount of $1,670.23, and against the defendant Sylben Bealty Corp., in the amount of $1,117.95, with costs.

Concur — Heoht, J. P., Steueb and Tilzer, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.