alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HYPERION SOFTWARE CORPORATION FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          32,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2800
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,182
<PP&E>                                          65,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,733
<BONDS>                                          8,691    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           211
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,718
<SALES>                                         40,725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,725
<CGS>                                           13,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,813
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,431
<INCOME-TAX>                                       910
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,521
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
I4/-/5*

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA #14-14-00053-CR OFFENSE: Injury to a Child, Elderly or Disabled Individual

STYLE: Clifton Javon Johnson v The State of Texas COUNTY: Fort Bend

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 268th District Court

DATE: December 23, 2014 Publish: No TC CASE #:13-DCR-063125

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Clifton Javon Johnson v The State of Texas

CCA#

APPELLANT** Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: 0 3\l2laJ>-a'

JUDGE: f,M UssQsfa^

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:.

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

\HI-/5

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
# C_2004106EN.01006303.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/63

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 19 February 2004

in Case T-19/03: Spyridoula Konstantopoulou v Court of Justice (1)

1

(Officials - Open competitions - Non-admission to the oral test)

(2004/C 106/128)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-19/03: Spyridoula Konstantopoulou, residing in Ioannina (Greece), represented by E. Boigelot, lawyer, against Court of Justice of the European Communities (Agent: M. Schauss) – application for annulment of the decision of the selection board in Open Competition LA/14 of the Court of Justice of 23 October 2002 – the Court of First Instance (fourth Chamber), composed of V. Tiili, President, P. Mengozzi and M. Vilaras, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 19 February 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ No C 83 of 5. 4. 2003.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 81410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25831]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Petitions IV-2023-9; FRL-11547-01-R4]


Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Order on Petition for 
Objection to State Operating Permit for Century Aluminum of South 
Carolina, Inc. (Berkeley County, South Carolina)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA Administrator signed an order dated November 2, 2023, 
granting in part, and denying in part the petition dated June 9, 2023, 
from Sierra Club and the Environmental Integrity Project. The petition 
requested that EPA object to Clean Air Act (CAA) title V operating 
permit issued by the South Carolina Department of Health and 
Environmental Control (SCDHEC) to the Century Aluminum of South 
Carolina, Inc. for its primary aluminum reduction facility located near 
Mt. Holly, in Berkeley County, South Carolina.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Art Hofmeister, Air Permits Section, 
EPA Region 4, (404) 562-9115, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eb83848d868e82989f8e99c58a999fab8e9b8ac58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="751d1a1318101c060110075b140701351005145b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>. The final order 
and petitions are available at: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA received a petition from Sierra Club and 
the Environmental Integrity Project dated June 9, 2023, requesting that 
EPA object to the issuance of operating permit no. TV-0420-0015 v1.1, 
issued by SCDHEC to Century Aluminum of South Carolina, Inc. near Mt. 
Holly, in Berkeley County, South Carolina. On November 2, 2023, the EPA 
Administrator issued an order granting in part and denying in part the 
petition. The order itself explains the bases for EPA's decision. 
Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner may 
request review of those portions of an order that deny issues in a 
petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the United States 
Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit no later than January 22, 
2024.

    Dated: November 16, 2023.
Jeaneanne Gettle,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2023-25831 Filed 11-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10410

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ADAN ORTIZ PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-192-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adan Ortiz Perez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ortiz Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-10410 Document: 00513012574 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
No. 14-10410

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-10410 Document: 00513012574 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
Home Oil Company Limited
                              304 Sixth Avenue West
                                Calgary, Alberta

                                                                    Telephone
                                                                  Amherst 6-7041




                                                    June 24, 1959




Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd.,
Magellan Petroleum Corporation,
Oil Investments, Inc.,
505 Eighth Avenue West,
Calgary, Alberta

Dear Sirs:

         This is to advise you that as further  consideration  for you  entering
into that certain  Agreement  dated as of May 28, 1959,  between the C-M-O group
and the H-S group, this company has agreed with you that they will guarantee the
performance by Kern County Land Company, Alminex Limited and United Oils Limited
of the respective covenants of those said companies contained in Article 3.1 (A)
and Article 3.l (B)(a) and (b).

                                             Yours very truly,

                                             HOME OIL COMPANY LIMITED


                                             Per:  _________________________


                                             Per:  _________________________


<PAGE>


                                                    June 24, 1959


Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd.
505 - 6th Avenue West
Calgary, Alberta

Gentlemen:

         This letter will serve as a memorandum confirming our further agreement
with respect to the contract  which we have  executed with you and certain other
parties today wherein you have agreed to assign a 50 percent interest in certain
Northwest Territories and Yukon Territory properties to us and the others to the
agreement, as follows:

         1. We will  cooperate  with you in your  efforts to promote oil and gas
pipe lines from  Northeast  British  Columbia and the Northwest  Territories  to
market.

         2. For purposes of  financing we will furnish to you,  Magellan and Oil
Investments, or to such third person banking institutions from time to time upon
your request  confirmation that the payments provided for under paragraph 3.1 of
the said agreement constitute unconditional obligations.

                                             Yours very truly,

                                             HOME OIL COMPANY LIMITED


                                             Per:  _________________________


                                             Per:  _________________________


                                             SIGNAL OIL AND GAS COMPANY


                                             Per:  _________________________


                                             Per:  _________________________
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 

THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC. 

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO TRUST AGREEMENT 

This Amendment No. 1 to Trust Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of June 15, 2018 (the
“Effective Date”) by and between The Greenbrier Companies, Inc., an Oregon corporation (the “Company”), and Reliance Trust Company, a trust organization under the laws of the United States of America. 

RECITALS 

A.    The parties have entered into that certain Trust Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012 (the
“Trust Agreement”), establishing a trust (the “Company Share Trust”) to hold shares of the Company’s common stock that are subject to deferral elections by participants in The Greenbrier Companies Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). 
 B.    The parties wish to amend the Trust
Agreement to provide that voting rights associated with shares of Company common stock held in the Company Share Trust will be exercised by the Company. 

The parties therefore agree as follows: 

AGREEMENT 

1.    Amendment to Trust Agreement. Section 5(b) of the Trust Agreement is
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“(b)    All rights associated with assets of the Trust shall be
exercised by the Trustee and shall in no event be exercised by or rest with Plan participants, except that notwithstanding any other provision of this Trust Agreement, voting rights with respect to Trust assets will be exercised by the
Company.” 
 2.    No Further Amendments. Except as amended hereby, the Trust
Agreement remains in full force and effect. 
 This Amendment has been executed as of the Effective Date by a duly
authorized representative of each party. 
  

									
	The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.	 		 	Reliance Trust Company
					
	By:	 	  
	 		 	By:	  	  

					
	Title:	 	  
	 		 	Title:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AFG
INVESTMENT TRUST B AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      12,192,535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,305,690
<PP&E>                                       9,712,996
<DEPRECIATION>                             (8,367,007)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,651,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          549,402
<BONDS>                                        623,171
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,479,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,651,679
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               839,458
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               589,642
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,957
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                236,859
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            236,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   236,859
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38

                             AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE

                         TANDY BRANDS ACCESSORIES, INC.

                         1997 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN


         Pursuant to the authority of the Board of Directors of Tandy Brands
Accessories, Inc. (the "Company"), and the provisions of Section 13 thereof, the
Tandy Brands Accessories, Inc. 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan is, subject to
the approval of the stockholders of the Company, hereby amended effective as of
October 16, 2001, in the following respects only:

         (1)    Section 6, subsection (a), is hereby amended to read as follows:

                  "(a) Subject to the provisions of Section 11 of this Plan, the
aggregate number of shares of Stock for which Options may be granted shall not
exceed 1,025,000 shares. The shares to be delivered upon exercise of Options
shall be made available, at the discretion of the Committee, either from the
authorized but unissued shares or from previously issued and reacquired shares
of Stock held by the Company as treasury shares."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as conclusive evidence of the adoption of the
foregoing instrument comprising Amendment No. 2 to the Tandy Brands Accessories,
Inc. 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan, the Company has caused its corporate seal
to be affixed hereto and these presents to be duly executed in its name and
behalf by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this 16th day of
October, 2001.

                                     TANDY BRANDS ACCESSORIES, INC.



                                     By: /s/ J.S.B. Jenkins
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        J.S.B. Jenkins, President
# C_2016202EN.01003501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/35

---

Article 36

(ex Article 21 TEU)

(ex Article 21 TEU)

The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy shall regularly consult the European Parliament on the main aspects and the basic choices of the common foreign and security policy and the common security and defence policy and inform it of how those policies evolve. He shall ensure that the views of the European Parliament are duly taken into consideration. Special representatives may be involved in briefing the European Parliament.

The European Parliament may address questions or make recommendations to the Council or the High Representative. Twice a year it shall hold a debate on progress in implementing the common foreign and security policy, including the common security and defence policy.

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Alan Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               
|---------------
|/s/ Alan Vituli

Alan Vituli

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

May 6, 2004
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00281

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal f rom the 362nd District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. F23

- 2654

- 362

Before Suddert h, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. M emorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth 

### E x pa rte David Mason Scott2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appe llant Davi d Mason Scott attempts to appeal from a docket entr y no ting
the denial of his requested habeas re lief

. Although an order denying pretrial habeas

re lie f is immediately appeal able , see Ex parte Sheffield , No. PD

- 1102

- 20, 2023 WL
4092 747, at *11 (Tex. Crim. App. J une 21, 2023) , “ to be appealabl e, t he order denying relief must be a signed written order. ” Ex Parte Fry , No. 07

- 12

- 00156

- CR, 2012 WL
1694 362, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo May 15, 2012, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not desig nated for publication). “ [A] docket entry, even one signed b y th e trial judge, is not an appealable written order

. ” Ex parte Salim , No s . 02

- 19

- 00009

- CR , 02

- 1 9

- 00010

- CR , 2019 WL 490516, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Feb. 7, 2019, no pet.) (per curiam ) (mem. op., not designated for pu bli cation ).
B ecause we have not received and Appellant has not referenced a writte n or der denying his requested habeas relief , and because s uch an order is necessary for us to obtain jurisdiction, see id. , w e warned Appellant that we c ould dismi ss his appea l fo r want of jurisdiction unless , wit hin ten days, Appellant or any other part y showed
groun ds for continuing it

. See Tex. R. App. P. 44. 3

. More than ten days have passed , and we have not received a response.3 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for wan t of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P

. 43 .2(f) ; Salim , 2019 WL 490516, at *1 ( dismissing similar appeal s from docket entr ies denying ha bea s relief ) ; Ex parte Wil ey , 949 S.W.2d 3, 4 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no writ) ( same ).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth
Bonnie Sudderth Chief Just ice

Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered : November 22, 2023
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 4, 2016

t1101 

# Order

Clerk November 4, 2016

152889

BETTINA WINKLER, by her next friends

HELGA DAHM WINKLER and MARVIN

WINKLER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 152889

COA: 323511

Oakland CC: 2014

- 141112

- CZ

MARIST FATHERS OF DETROIT, INC., d/b/a

NOTRE DAME PREPARATORY HIGH

SCHOOL AND MARIST ACADEMY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 12, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order

addressing: (1) whether the doctrine of ecclesiastical abstention involves a question of a

court’s subject matter jurisdiction ove r a claim, compare Lamont Community Church v

Lamont Christian Reformed Church, 285 Mich App 602, 616 (2009)

, with Dlaikan v

Roodbeen, 206 Mich App 591, 594 (1994); (2) whether the Court of Appeals correctly

concluded that consideration of plaintiff’s chall enge to defendant’s admission decision

would have impermissibly entangled the trial court “in questions of religious doctrine or

ecclesiastical polity,” Dlaikan, 206 Mich App at 594; and (3) whether this Court should

overrule Dlaikan , and if so, on what ba sis. The parties should not submit mere

restatements of their application papers.

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.