alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| NAME      OF SUBSIDIARY                       | STATE      OR COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                          |                                   |
| Chattem      (U.K.) Limited                   | England                                |
| HBA      Indemnity Insurance, Ltd.            | Cayman      Islands                    |
| Signal      Investment & Management Co.   | Delaware                               |
| SunDex,      LLC                              | Tennessee                              |
| Chattem      Global Consumer Products Limited | Ireland                                |
| Chattem      Greece S.A.                      | Greece                                 |
| Chattem      (Canada) Corp.                   | Canada                                 |
| Chattem      Canada ULC                       | Canada                                 |
| Chattem      Canada                           | Canada                                 |
| Chattem      (Canada) Holdings, Inc.          | Delaware                               |
| Chattem      Peru S.R.L.                      | Peru                                   |
# C_2016202EN.01011001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/110 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/110

---

Article 142

(ex Article 124(1) TEC)

(ex Article 124(1) TEC)

Each Member State with a derogation shall treat its exchange-rate policy as a matter of common interest. In so doing, Member States shall take account of the experience acquired in cooperation within the framework of the exchange-rate mechanism.

---
David M. Kirstein 

Direct 202.331-3348 

Fax 202.331.3933 

Email dkirstein@yklaw.com 

March 5, 2010 

BY ELECTRONIC FILING

Robert J. Finamore 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of International Aviation, X-45 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

RE: Partial Withdrawal of Exemption Renewal Application of vivaAerobus 

Docket OST-2008-0095

Dear Mr. Finamore: 

Aeroenlaces Nacionales, S.A. de C.V. d/b/a vivaAerobus hereby withdraws the (1) 

Veracruz, Mexico and Austin, Texas and (2) Puerto Vallarta, Mexico and Austin, Texas portions 

of the Application for Renewal of Exemption filed on February 24, 2010 in Docket OST-2008-

0095. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 David M. Kirstein 

 

 

cc: Robert Finamore by email
EXHIBIT 31(ii)
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Camco Financial Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluations; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  October 20, 2009

/s/ James E. BrooksJames E. BrooksChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
To whom it may concern,

I, Andrew B. Duffin, am writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95 FEB.

14, 2012, Section 333 and the procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 11, be exempt from the Federal Aviation

Regulations as specified and seek exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121,

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System

pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA).

This exemption request will permit Andrew B. Duffin, as the owner and operator of Unmanned Aircraft System's (UAS)

for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of Real Estate, perform home and or business

exterior inspections, agricultural inspections, and general photography.

I as the sole operator of the named UAS vehicles, consisting of a DJI Inspire 1 UAS, and a DJI Phantom 2 UAS, and

their use will be for commercial photography and video for hire, namely, Real Estate Photography, home and or business

exterior inspections, wedding and events, increase public knowledge of UAS and promote safe UAS operations, land

and survey appraisals, and agricultural assessments on local farms as needed.

I am an experienced pilot with the above-mentioned aircraft and have over 10 years of experience in radio control

aircraft experience. The above mentioned aircraft are GPS assisted for location based information, and include a “Return

to Home” safety feature in case of signal loss. I will perform all pre-flight and post- flight checks, and system/vehicle

maintenance. All flights will be L.O.S. And will have a spotter as needed. All flights will maintain less than 400' A.G.L.

The Inspire 1 craft weighs 6.5 pounds; the Phantom 2 weighs 3 pounds. Both are battery operated, which are quieter as

not to disrupt surrounding neighbors and businesses. Both aircrafts also have a safety feature in the software which will

not allow it to spool up the motors if within a certain distance of Class A/B/C, etc.... airports.

The use of these aircraft is financially viable as the cost to the consumer is much less than hiring a full size aircraft and

pilot. The aircraft are also safer and can access areas a full size aircraft can't. For home inspections, they also allow a

total roof inspection without the need of ladders and harnesses, which also creates a safer and less costly option to the

client.

Thank you very much for your consideration and I look forward to your response.

 Sincerely,

Andrew B. Duffin

100 Liverton Lane

Louisville, KY 40222

317-363-5618

Andrew.Duffin@Yahoo.com
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 6, 2011 

t0829 

Order 

 

September 6, 2011 

142740 

JAMES E. PEASE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 142740 

 COA: 293305 

Wayne CC: 97-731630-DO 

MARY JANE PEASE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2016202EN.01019101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/191 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/191

---

Article 333

(ex Articles 27a to 27e, 40 to 40b and 43 to 45 TEU and ex Articles 11 and 11a TEC)

(ex Articles 27a

e

b

a

1.   Where a provision of the Treaties which may be applied in the context of enhanced cooperation stipulates that the Council shall act unanimously, the Council, acting unanimously in accordance with the arrangements laid down in Article 330, may adopt a decision stipulating that it will act by a qualified majority.

2.   Where a provision of the Treaties which may be applied in the context of enhanced cooperation stipulates that the Council shall adopt acts under a special legislative procedure, the Council, acting unanimously in accordance with the arrangements laid down in Article 330, may adopt a decision stipulating that it will act under the ordinary legislative procedure. The Council shall act after consulting the European Parliament.

3.   Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to decisions having military or defence implications.

---
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply632Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  MICHAEL J LILL... (not verified)PermalinkMarch 10, 2020 - 3:21pmAs a retired Pipefitter, I know the value of this plasma cutter, yes fast, but more important  the accuracy was outstanding.  Safety is improved.  This will become more "in usage" as time goes on.  Thank you for this service.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
The Attorney General of Texas 

March 22, 1978 

JOHN L. HILL 

Attorney General 

Honorable Chris Victor Semos 

Chairman, Committee on Business 

and Industry 

House of Representatives 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Mr..Semos: 

Opinion No. H-1141 

Re: Application of article 5221f 

to lessors of mobile homes. 

You ask whether, in light of 19’77 amendments, a lessor of mobile homes 

is a ‘dealer” or ‘salesperson” as those terms are used in article 5221f, V.T.C.S. 

Prior to its amendment by Senate Bill 305, [Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 139 

at 2881 section 3 of article 5221f defined “dealer” to include a person who 

buys for resale, sells, exchanges, leases or rents mobile homes. “Salesperson” 

was defined as a person who sold, auctioned or rented mobile homes. Senate 

Bill 305 amended section 3 to define “dealer” as a person who buys for resale, 

sells or exchanges mobile homes or offers such for sale, exchange or leasepurchase. The definition of Ulesperson” was amended to “any person who 

. . . sells or lease-purchases or offers to sell or lease-purchase mobile homes 

to consumers as an employee or agent of a dealer.” The clear legislative 

intent was to remove mere lessors from these definitions. Accordingly, in our 

opinion a person who leases mobile homes is not a dealer or salesperson under 

article 5221f unless the lease contract includes a provision conferring on the 

lessee an option to purchase the mobile home. Article 5221f, S 3(n). 

SUMMARY 

A lessor of mobile homes is not a dealer or salesperson 

under article 5221f unless the lease contains a provision conferring on the lessee an option to purchase the 

mobile home. 

/’ 

Attorney General of Texas 

I/’ 

P. 4642 
Honorable Chris Victor Semos - Page 2 (H-1141) 

APPROVED: 

Opinion Committee ’ 

Ist 

p. 4643
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
The Monroe Doctrine, 1823
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

Responding to Russian territorial claims along the northern Pacific coast, and concerned that European nations would attempt to seize recently independent Latin American states, President James Monroe announced a new national policy. No new colonies would be allowed in the Americas, and European powers were not to interfere in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere. This mural depicts a discussion among the president and members of his cabinet; from left to right are President James Monroe, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams, Attorney General William Wirt, Secretary of War John Calhoun, and Secretary of the Navy Samuel L. Southard.

**Left:** Simón Bolívar, who fought for the independence of many Spanish colonies in South America, represents a commitment to liberty.

**Right:** Greek freedom fighters, who were aided by Russia, Britain, and France in gaining autonomy from the Ottoman Empire, symbolize the struggle for freedom around the globe.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The central east-west corridor is referred to as the Great Experiment Hall because it chronicles in 16 murals the legislative milestones of three centuries, from the signing of the Mayflower Compact in 1629 to the enactment of women's suffrage in 1920. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Order filed September 18, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00685

- CV

____________ DEBORAH LEWIS , Appellant

V.

BRANT ROCK APARTMENT S, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1043913



### O R D E R
According to information provided to this court, this is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory order for possession of property signed August 11, 2014. The notice of appeal was filed August 12, 2014. To date, t he filing fee of $19 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has establ ished indigence has been filed.
See Tex. R. App. P

. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
It appears that no final judgment has been signed. The appeal is s ubject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant files a response on or beforeSeptember 30, 2014 , demonstrating that this court has jurisdiction over this

appeal. Appellant is also ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $1 9 5.00 to
the Clerk of this court on or before September 30, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal
will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4724-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-4724-DR), dated August 10, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued October 13, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective September 30, 2023.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-26277 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
# EUR-Lex - 22002D0055 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22002D0055

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 55/2002 of 31 May 2002 amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 238 , 05/09/2002 P. 0016 - 0017 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 55/2002

of 31 May 2002

amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision No 36/2002 of the EEA Joint Committee of 19 April 2002(1).

(2) Decision of the Administrative Commission of the European Communities on Social Security for Migrant Workers No 181 of 13 December 2000 concerning the interpretation of Articles 14(1), 14a(1) and 14b(1) and (2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the legislation applicable to posted workers and self-employed workers temporarily working outside the competent State(2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

(3) Decision of the Administrative Commission of the European Communities on Social Security for Migrant Workers No 182 of 13 December 2000, concerning the establishment of a common framework for the collection of data on the settlement of pension claims(3) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following points shall be inserted after point 3.58 (Decision No 180) of Annex VI to the Agreement: "3.59. 32001 D 0891: Decision of the Administrative Commission of the European Communities on Social Security for Migrant Workers No 181 of 13 December 2000 concerning the interpretation of Articles 14(1), 14a(1) and 14b(1) and (2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the legislation applicable to posted workers and self-employed workers temporarily working outside the competent State (OJ L 329, 14.12.2001, p. 73),

3.60. 32001 D 0655: Decision of the Administrative Commission of the European Communities on Social Security for Migrant Workers No 182 of 13 December 2000, concerning the establishment of a common framework for the collection of data on the settlement of pension claims (OJ L 230, 28.8.2001, p. 20)."

Article 2

The texts of Decisions Nos 181 and 182 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Communities, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 June 2002, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(4).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels, 31 May 2002.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

P. Westerlund

(1) OJ L 154, 13.6.2002, p. 20.

(2) OJ L 329, 14.12.2001, p. 73.

(3) OJ L 230, 28.8.2001, p. 20.

(4) No constitutional requirements indicated.