alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1529 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to provide that the supplemental security income benefits of adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities shall not be reduced by reason of marriage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2019 

Mr. KATKO (for himself and Mr. KEATING) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to provide 

that the supplemental security income benefits of adults 

with intellectual or developmental disabilities shall not 

be reduced by reason of marriage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marriage Access for 

5 People with Special Abilities Act’’ or the ‘‘MAPSA Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1529 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS. 

2 (a) ELIGIBILITY FOR BENEFITS.—Section 1611(a) of 

3 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382(a)) is amended 

4 by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(4) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2) of this 

6 subsection, each individual who has attained 18 years of 

7 age, who is diagnosed with an intellectual or develop8 mental disability, whose income, other than income ex9 cluded pursuant to section 1612(b), is at not more than 

10 the rate in effect for purposes of paragraph (1)(A) of this 

11 subsection, and whose resources, other than resources ex12 cluded pursuant to section 1613(a), are not more than the 

13 applicable amount in effect for purposes of paragraph 

14 (3)(B) of this subsection, shall be an eligible individual 

15 for purposes of this title.’’. 

16 (b) AMOUNT OF BENEFIT.—Section 1611(b) of such 

17 Act (42 U.S.C. 1382(b)) is amended by adding at the end 

18 the following: 

19 ‘‘(3) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2) of this 

20 subsection, the benefit under this title for an individual 

21 described in subsection (a)(4) of this section, whether or 

22 not the individual has an eligible spouse, shall be payable 

23 at the rate in effect for purposes of such paragraph (1), 

24 reduced by the amount of income, not excluded pursuant 

25 to section 1612(b), of the individual.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1529 IH

1 (c) INCOME AND RESOURCE DEEMING RULES.—Sec2 tion 1614(f) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(f)) is amended 

3 by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(5) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this sub5 section, for purposes of determining eligibility for, and the 

6 amount of, benefits for an individual described in section 

7 1611(a)(4) who is married, the income and resources of 

8 the individual is deemed to not include any income or re9 sources of the spouse.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51108 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. JOSE MANUEL VALDESPINO Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-813-1 Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Manuel Valdespino raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D January 30, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51108

2 7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 11.1
                         WIRELESS TELECOM GROUP, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                             For the Three Months        For the Nine Months
                              Ended September 30,        Ended September 30,
                               1996          1995         1996          1995
                              -----         -----        -----         -----

<S>                          <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>
NET INCOME                 $ 2,062,062  $ 1,462,937  $ 5,409,477   $ 3,813,130
                            ----------   ----------   ----------    ----------
PRIMARY
 Weighted average shares    17,354,571   17,159,290   17,325,159    17,044,446
 Assumed conversions:
   Stock options               400,059      455,598      390,555       430,454
    Total weighted average ----------   -----------    ----------   ----------
      shares outstanding    17,754,630   17,614,888    17,715,714   17,474,900
                            ==========   ==========    ==========   ==========
 Per share amounts          $     .12   $      .08   $       .31    $      .22
                                  ===          ===           ===           ===

FULLY DILUTED
Weighted average shares    17,354,571   17,159,290    17,325,159    17,044,446
Assumed conversions:
   Stock options              410,255      455,598       402,977       510,518
    Total weighted average ----------   ----------    ----------  ------------
      shares outstanding   17,764,826   17,614,888    17,728,136    17,554,964
                           ==========   ==========    ==========    ==========

 Per share amounts         $     .12   $      .08   $       .31    $       .22
                                 ===          ===           ===            ===

</TABLE>

                                          -13-
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, the undersigned officer of ARI Network Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that:

         (1)      the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                  ended October 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated:  December 16, 2002


                                                 /s/ Timothy Sherlock
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Timothy Sherlock
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer
28062

#### State v. Fontes

Affirmed
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30620 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. KEVIN MORRIS Defendant-Appellant

______________________ 07-30657

______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. ANITA D MORRIS Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:06-CR-10030-4 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 23, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-30620 c/w 07-30657

* Pursuant to 5

TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

2 Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * In these consolidated appeals, Kevin Morrisappeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for conspiracy to commit financial aid fraud and bank fraud. Anita D. Morris appeals the sentence imposed following her conviction for one count ofconspiracy to commit financial aid fraud and bank fraud and one substantive count of bank fraud. Both Kevin and Anita Morris argue that their trial counsel were ineffective for failing to object to the sentence enhancement imposed under U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(8)(D). The record is not sufficiently developed to evaluate the substance of the appellants’ claims on direct appeal. Therefore, we decline to address the i neffective assistance of counsel claims, without prejudice to the appellants’ rights to raise them in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See United Statesv. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, thejudgments ofthe district court against Kevin Morris and Anita D. Morris are AFFIRMED.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply580Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  donna redmond ... (not verified)PermalinkNovember 15, 2017 - 6:00pmmy cousin Larry Spiekermeier was chosen to drive this year's tree from Eureka Mt to DC I had the honor of riding with him from Thompson Falls to Plains MT, it was a very pleasant trip tho short, the people all came out to take pictures and wish Larry Godspeed! The people of Montana are proud! It is a beautiful tree._x000D_
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF PEANUTS

FOR RELEASE AT 1:30 P.M. CT October 4, 2019

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of peanuts. The peanuts 

were sold under Peanut Invitation No. 10 dated September 24, 2019.

Catalog 

Lot Catalog Location Purchaser Tons Sold Bid Price (per ton) CCC Revenue Peanut Type

Lot #2 Dublin, NC Great Sourthern Peanut 703.37 $347.50 $ 244,421.08 Virginia

Lot #11 Dublin, NC Golden Grove USA, Inc 2,072.24 $326.25 $ 676,068.30 Virginia

Lot #12 Dublin, NC Golden Grove USA, Inc 2,072.55 $326.25 $ 676,169.44 Virginia

Lot #13 Dublin, NC Golden Grove USA, Inc 2,059.70 $325.00 $ 669,402.50 Virginia

Lot #14 Dublin, NC Golden Grove USA, Inc 2,045.62 $325.00 $ 664,826.50 Virginia

Lot #15 Dublin, NC Golden Grove USA, Inc 2,057.25 $325.00 $ 668,606.25 Virginia

Lot #16 Dublin, NC Great Sourthern Peanut 2,041.36 $347.50 $ 709,372.60 Virginia

Totals 13,052.09 $ 4,308,866.66
2017 Annual Industry Meeting* 

for USDA Foods Contractors and Suppliers

WHEN: Tuesday, October 24, 8:30-10:00am

AGENDA: 8:30-9:00am: Step-by-step demonstration on submitting a vendor response

How to create an offer

How to export/import prices

How to add an offshore bid (i.e., to the U.S. port and/or 

to the final destination)

Highlight the NEW offer remark/attachment feature

How to enter constraints

9:00-9:15am: ASN’s and Invoices

Create and submit ASN’s (manual/upload)

Creating invoices including replacement invoices

9:15-10:00am: Reports

ASN report

List of invoices report

PO item report

GR detail report

Vendor BP Relationship report

Questions

 Pre-registration is open now!

 Visit https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food and click “Stay up to date on USDA food purchases” for 

email news and updates

 Email questions to CPIndustryMeeting@ams.usda.gov or call (202) 720-4517

* The conference will be held on Tuesday, October 24 – Wednesday, October 25, 2017, at the DoubleTree by Hilton, 

Washington DC- Crystal City located at 300 Army-Navy Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

AMS Commodity Procurement Staff: Together We’re Making a Difference- American Agriculture for the American People

WBSCM SESSION

USDA is an equal opportunity employer and provider.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000016804
<NAME>                        Canada Southern Petroleum, Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                    Canadian Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                .7297
<CASH>                                         2,709,597
<SECURITIES>                                   3,404,213
<RECEIVABLES>                                  635,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,976,401
<PP&E>                                         11,349,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 20,374,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          621,941
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       13,956,450
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,546,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   20,374,919
<SALES>                                        1,754,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,228,393
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,689,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,461,283)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,461,283)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,461,283)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.11)
        


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 2105** 

LAVERN R. CR U MP , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; JERRY D. WEAST; CARMEN L. VAN ZUTPHEN , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paul W. Grimm , District Judge. ( 8 :12

- cv - 0 3378

- PWG )

Submitted : January 22, 2015 Decided: January 26, 2015

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Lavern R. Crump , Appellant Pro Se. Christine M. Collins, Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland , for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lavern R. Crump seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing her employment discrimination action . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days af ter the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T ]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bow l e s v. Russell , 551 U.S. 2 0 5, 2 1 4 ( 2007 ).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket

on October 25, 2013 . The notice of appeal was filed on October
14, 2014 . Because Crump failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the mater ials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
LASERSIGHT INCORPORATED

                                                                      Exhibit 32


      Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

      Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of LaserSight
Incorporated (the "Company") does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's
knowledge, that:

      1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly
      period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



                                          /S/ Danghui ("David") Liu
Dated: March 22, 2005              ------------------------------------------
                                               Danghui ("David") Liu,
                                               Chief Executive Officer



                                           /S/ Dorothy M. Cipolla
Dated: March 22, 2005              ------------------------------------------
                                                 Dorothy M. Cipolla,
                                               Chief Financial Officer

      The certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit
solely pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, and shall not be deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1934, as
amended.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 1350, has been provided to LaserSight Incorporated
and will be retained by LaserSight Incorporated and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          27,314
<SECURITIES>                                    15,572
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,948
<PP&E>                                           6,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,917
<SALES>                                          7,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,537
<CGS>                                              205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,619
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (502)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    941
<INCOME-TAX>                                        76
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                865
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       865
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of This Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CDI Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respect,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



By:

/s/    ROGER H. BALLOURoger H. Ballou President and Chief Executive Officer




Dated:
March 7, 2008



By:

/s/    MARK A. KERSCHNERMark A. Kerschner Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




Dated:
March 7, 2008



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to CDI Corp. and will be retained by CDI Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.