alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 954 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 954

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the 
    individual mandate certain individuals who had coverage under a 
 terminated qualified health plan funded through the Consumer Operated 
                   and Oriented Plan (CO-OP) program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2015

Mr. Smith of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the 
    individual mandate certain individuals who had coverage under a 
 terminated qualified health plan funded through the Consumer Operated 
                   and Oriented Plan (CO-OP) program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM INDIVIDUAL MANDATE FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS 
              WHO HAD COVERAGE UNDER A TERMINATED QUALIFIED HEALTH PLAN 
              FUNDED THROUGH THE CONSUMER OPERATED AND ORIENTED PLAN 
              (CO-OP) PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 5000A(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(6) Certain individuals previously enrolled in qualified 
        health plans funded through the consumer operated and oriented 
        plan (co-op) program.--In the case of an applicable individual 
        who was enrolled in a qualified health plan offered by a 
        qualified nonprofit health insurance issuer (as defined in 
        subsection (c) of section 1322 of the Patient Protection and 
        Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18042)) receiving funds through 
        the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan program established 
        under such section for such plan and such issuer terminated or 
        otherwise discontinued providing the plan in the area in which 
        the individual resides during a month during a calendar year, 
        the applicable individual for--
                    ``(A) such month and each subsequent month during 
                such calendar year, or
                    ``(B) in the case the date of such discontinuance 
                occurs during a month in the last quarter of a calendar 
                year, such month and each subsequent month during such 
                calendar year and the subsequent calendar year.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to October 2014 and subsequent months.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7535

JIMMY REID,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DONALD MOBLEY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-00029-TDS-LPA)

Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: April 16, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH 

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Reid seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Reid has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Reid’s motion for leave 

to conduct discovery, deny his motion for a certificate of 

appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
28309

#### State v. Kapua

Vacated and Remanded
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00148-CR

Aaron Lee Robert Flores

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

186th District Court of Bexar County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2014CR1271

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 16, 2015.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Alan
Vituli, Chief Executive Officer of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ALAN VITULI                                  
|Alan Vituli                                      
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|March 9, 2010
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00070

- CV

STEPHEN WULFF, Appellant
V. JEFF FRATANGELO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 276th District Court Marion County, Texas Trial Court No. 0900107

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Stephen Wulff , appellant, filed a notice of appeal in this matter on August 22 , 201 4. Both the clerk’s and reporter’s records were due to be filed with this Court on or before November 24, 2014. Neither record has been filed, and there is no indication that Wulff has paid
for or made arrangements for payment of the fees associated with their preparation. Unless otherwise excused, a non

- indigent appellant must either pay for or make arrangements for the payment of the fees related to preparation of the appellate record to ensure
that t he record is timely filed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(a)(2), (b)(3); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(c); 37.3(b), (c). By letter dated December 22, 2014, and pursuant to Rules 37.3(b) and (c) and 42.3(b) and (c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, our clerk’s o ffice provided Wulff with notice of and an opportunity to cure these defects. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b), (c) , 42.3(b) , (c)

. The
clerk’s l etter further warned Wulff that if he did not submit an adequate response to our defect letter within ten days of t he date of the letter, his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. W e have received no communication from Wulff responsive to the December 22 correspondence from our clerk’s office, and we have not received the appellate
record

.3 Pursua nt to Rules 37.3(b) and (c) and 42.3(b) and (c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Ralph K. Burgess Justice
Date Submitted: January 1 5 , 2015 Date Decided: January 1 6 , 2015
November 29, 2006

26486

#### State v. Schmidt

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 24.10
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


The  undersigned,  as  President  of Public  Service  Company of  Oklahoma  (the
"Company"), hereby makes, constitutes and appoints R. Russell Davis his true and
lawful  attorney-in-fact  and agent, with full power and authority to execute in
the  name and on  behalf  of the  undersigned,  in any and all  capacities,  the
Company's  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K  for  1999  and any and all  amendments
thereto, to be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and
any other documents and instruments  incidental  thereto,  and to file the same,
with all exhibits  thereto and all documents in connection  therewith,  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission,  hereby granting to such  attorney-in-fact,
and agents,  full power and  authority of  substitution  and  revocation  in the
premises  and full power and  authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully for
all intents  and  purposes  as the  undersigned  might or could do in person and
hereby ratifying and confirming all that such  attorney-in-fact  and agents, may
do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have hereunto  executed this Power of Attorney this 18th
day of January, 2000.


                                                /s/ T. D. Churchwell
                                                T. D. Churchwell
                                                President and Director

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 18th day of January, 2000 by T. D.
Churchwell.

                                                /s/ Lina P. Holm
                                                Notary Public
                                                State of Oklahoma

My Commission Expires:  January 28, 2003
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Robert Chapman... (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 15, 2021 - 7:46pmI, Robert Chapman, would like to thank you all for your service at the nation's Capitol building and grounds. May God continue to bless you all and the United States of America.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-13-00695-CV

KIPP, Inc. 

v.

Kimberly Whitehead

NO. 2011-70657 IN THE 234TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

SUPP CLK RECORD

E-TXGOV FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

FILING

CLK RECORD

E-TXGOV FEE

$14.00

$5.00

$5.00

$5.00

$5.00

$175.00

$650.00

$5.00

12/17/2013

10/21/2013

09/30/2013

09/27/2013

09/11/2013

08/26/2013

08/22/2013

08/19/2013

UNKNOWN

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

E-PAID

UNK

ANT

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$864.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 
hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this April 17, 2015.
EXHIBIT 24.5
                                   CERTIFICATE

      I, Kenneth C. Raney, Jr., Secretary of Central and South West Corporation,
a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),  hereby certify that set forth below
is a complete and accurate copy of a certain  resolution adopted by the Board of
Directors of the  Corporation  on this 19th day of January,  2000, and that such
resolution is in full force and effect as of the date of this certificate.


                       Central and South West Corporation
                          Board of Directors Resolution
                                January 19, 2000

      RESOLVED,  that each officer of Central and South West Corporation  listed
at the end of this  sentence  is  hereby  authorized  to  make,  constitute  and
appoint,  in his  respective  capacity,  a power  of  attorney  in  favor of the
person(s)  listed  directly after his name at the end of this  sentence,  as his
true and lawful  attorney(s)-in-fact and agent(s), with full power and authority
(and in the case of more than one attorney-in-fact, each attorney-in-fact acting
alone  and  without  the  other)  to  execute  in the name and on  behalf of the
officer, in any and all capacities, the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for 1999 and any and all  amendments  thereto,  to be filed under the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  as  amended,  and any other  documents  and  instruments
incidental  thereto,  and to file the same,  with all  exhibits  thereto and all
documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
and grant to such  attorney(s)-in-fact,  and  agent(s)  (and in the case of more
than  one  attorney-in-fact,   each  of  them),  full  power  and  authority  of
substitution  and  revocation in the premises and full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing  requisite  and necessary to be done in
and about the  premises,  as fully and all intents  and  purposes as the officer
might or could do in person.

1.    E.R.  Brooks is  authorized  to make,  constitute  and appoint  Glenn D.
      Rosilier and Lawrence B. Connors to be his attorney(s)-in-fact.
2.    Glenn D.  Rosilier is authorized  to make,  constitute  and appoint E.R.
      Brooks and Lawrence B. Connors to be his attorney(s)-in-fact.
3.    Lawrence B. Connors is authorized to make,  constitute  and appoint E.R.
      Brooks and Glenn D. Rosilier to be his attorney(s)-in-fact.

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of
Central and South West Corporation this day, the 19th of January, 2000.



      /s/ Kenneth C. Raney, Jr.
          Kenneth C. Raney, Jr.




      CORPORATE SEAL
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains summary  information extracted
from the accompanying financial statements and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                       16,937,310
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                17,324,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  3,780,903
<INVENTORY>                                                   9,389,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             40,437,744
<PP&E>                                                        4,309,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                                2,385,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               63,623,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        12,735,334
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                       4,000
<COMMON>                                                         19,949
<OTHER-SE>                                                   50,040,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 63,623,548
<SALES>                                                       7,832,478
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              8,695,002
<CGS>                                                         3,408,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 3,493,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              7,665,755
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                556,538
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                2,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (2,758,952)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (2,758,952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (2,758,952)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (0.14)


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IEA Income Fund XII, L.P. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John
Kallas, the Chief Financial Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., the
General Partner of the Registrant, certify, based on my knowledge,
that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                                 
| | ---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Registrant.

| |                   |  |  |                                                                                               
| | ----------------- |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | November 14, 2002 |  |  |                                                                                               
|
|
|
|
| |                   |  |  | /s/ John Kallas                                                                               
| |                   |  |  |                                                                                               
| |                   |  |  | John Kallas
Chief Financial Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Registrant



---

|* |  | This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, other than as required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------