alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply592Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Thomas H Neale... (not verified)PermalinkMarch 13, 2018 - 4:12pmDear Mr. Ayers,  Thanks for sharing your discovery of the image of George Washington on Clio's car of history.  Clio is a more benevolent image than Father Time, who carries all before him from his perch above the Main Reading Room at the Library of Congress.  Even though he's not driving a chariot, when I see it, I recall Andrew Marvell:  "But at my back, I always hear Time's winged chariot hurrying near."_x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION 

INSPECTOR’S ASSISTANT AUTHORIZATION RECORD 

STATE/DISTRICT: ___________________ 

COMMODITY: _____________________ 

CROP YEAR: _______________________ 

NAME SOCIAL 

SECURITY NO. 

DATE 

STARTED 

DATE 

TERMINATED 

TYPE OF TRAINING 

RECEIVED POSITION 

DATE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT 

BRIBERY PROCEDURES SIGNED 

AND BRIBERY CARD ISSUED 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

18. 

19. 

20. 

21. 

22. 

23. 

24. 

25. 

I certify that the above information is correct and that each person listed above has been satisfactorily trained for the specified position and that all appropriate documents have been issued to and read, and signed if required, by the listed person. 

Authorizing Supervisor: ___________________________________ Date: _________________________________ Date sent to Federal Program Manager: ____________________________ 

SC-248 (9-21) Previous editions may be used. REPRODUCE LOCALLY. Include form number and date on all reproductions. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

MARCUS EMILIO VILLARREAL,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 23

- 462

D.C. No. 1:15

- cr

- 00051

- BLW

- 2

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill

, District Judge , Presiding

Submitted December 12, 2023 **

Before: WALLACE, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Marcus Emilio Villa r

real appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 24

- month sentence imposed upon the third revocation of his

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Villar r eal contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 18 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 23

- 462

the district court failed to adequately account for his progress on supervision and

his mitigating factors. The district court did not abuse its discretion

. See Gall v.

United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). T he above

- Guidelines, statutory maximum

sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) factors and

the totality of the circumstances, including Villar r eal’s repeated breaches of the

court’s trust

. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51 (stating totality of the circumstances

standard); Un ited States v. Miqbel , 444 F.3d 1173, 11 82 (9th Cir. 2006) (holding

that a revocation sentence may be imposed as a sanction for the defendant’s breach

of the court’s trust) ; see also United States v. Gutierrez

- Sanchez , 587 F.3d 904,

908 (9th Cir. 2009) ( “The weight to be given the various factors in a particular case

is for the discretion of the district court.” )

.

AFFIRMED.
**Application for the**

**USDA Grass Fed Program for Small and Very Small Producers - Cattle**

*Refer to QAD 1020 Procedure for directions on submitting this form*. 

Answer the following questions to

**Identify Conformance to the Grass Fed Claim**

**(Provide Detail Information)**

*USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.*		Approved by __________JW

Dated Issued:	01/12/16

# image1.jpeg

# image2.png
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 4

SECTION 4

THE COMMISSION

Article 249

(ex Articles 218(2) and 212 TEC)

(ex Articles 218(2) and 212 TEC)

1.   The Commission shall adopt its Rules of Procedure so as to ensure that both it and its departments operate. It shall ensure that these Rules are published.

2.   The Commission shall publish annually, not later than one month before the opening of the session of the European Parliament, a general report on the activities of the Union.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                            5,348,194
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         6,392
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  6,385,785
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    6,455,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               208,303
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            554,991
<OTHER-SE>                        2,656,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      6,455,585
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      28,578
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  28,578
<DISCONTINUED>                     (460,775)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (432,197)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.14)


</TABLE>
# C_2016202EN.01039401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/394 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/394

---

Article 5

Prohibition of slavery and forced labour

1.   No one shall be held in slavery or servitude.

2.   No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour.

3.   Trafficking in human beings is prohibited.

---
22895

#### State v. Maielua

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           151,652
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 151,652
<CASH>                                           1,014
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               7,856
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           8,420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 285,244
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                115,235
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             74,502
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 23,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,623
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,922
<PREMIUMS>                                     107,948
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              6,811
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 363
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   9,005
<BENEFITS>                                      97,297
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     26,116
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             6,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,159)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,662)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,487)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,487)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.45)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  92,205
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             92,797
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                4,500
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              41,899
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                61,572
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 86,031
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          4,500
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 90 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 90

   To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct 
  reviews of certain budget requests of the President for the medical 
          care accounts of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2015

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct 
  reviews of certain budget requests of the President for the medical 
          care accounts of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Healthcare Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              MEDICAL CARE BUDGET SUBMISSIONS.

    Section 4 of the Veterans Health Care Budget Reform and 
Transparency Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-81; 38 U.S.C. 117 note) is 
amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 4. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              MEDICAL CARE BUDGET SUBMISSION.

    ``(a) Review of Budget Submission; Reports.--For each of fiscal 
years 2016, 2017, and 2018, the Comptroller General of the United 
States shall--
            ``(1) review the budget requests for the medical care 
        accounts of the Department of Veterans Affairs in the budget 
        request of the President submitted pursuant to section 1105 of 
        title 31, United States Code; and
            ``(2) submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs, 
        Appropriations, and the Budget of the Senate and the House of 
        Representatives a report or reports on the results of each such 
        review.
    ``(b) Timing and Scope of Reports.--In determining the timing and 
scope for the submittal of the report or reports required under 
subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall consult with the 
Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and the House of 
Representatives.
    ``(c) Medical Care Accounts.--In this section, the term `medical 
care accounts of the Department of Veterans Affairs' means the 
following medical care accounts of the Veterans Health Administration, 
Department of Veterans Affairs account:
            ``(1) Medical Services.
            ``(2) Medical Support and Compliance.
            ``(3) Medical Facilities.''.
                                 <all>
```
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE MATTER OF THE PARENTAL No. 67054
RIGHTS AS TO: MALACHI PATRICK
LEONARD AND HOLDEN GREGORY
LEONARD, MINOR CHILDREN. E i L E

NENITA LEONARD, ha anes
Appellant, APR 29 20:3

vs. TRAC! LINDEM
MICHELLE KELLY; AND EDWARD Raid ialuiten’4
KELLY, EPUTY CLERK

Respondents.

| ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Cause appearing, appellant’s motion for a voluntary dismissal
of this appeal is granted. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. NRAP
42(b).1

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT
TRACIE K. LINDEMAN

By: Miata ft Ww

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge
Fricke Law Ltd.
Peter B. Jaquette
Carson City Clerk

1 Appellant’s motion for stay of appeal and waiver of filing fee is
denied as moot.

‘Supreme Court
oF
Nevapa

CLERK’S ORDER

on a IS- GOB

=
EXHIBIT 10(B)


                                 SHEA & GARDNER
                        1800 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
                             Washington, D.C. 20036

                                 (202) 828-2000
                              Fax: (202) 828-2195



                                 April 30, 2002



Board of Directors
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
751 Broad Street
Newark, NJ 07102


Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the State of Additional Information filed as part of Post-Effective
Amendment No. 8 to the registration statement on Form N-4 for The Prudential
Discovery Premier Group Variable Contract Account (File No. 333-23271). In
giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons
whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.


                                          Very truly yours,

                                          SHEA & GARDNER


                                          By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER E. PALMER
                                              --------------------------------
                                                  Christopher E. Palmer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2426Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Daniel Linville (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 4, 2021 - 7:56pmI was elated to read this article and learn of the lantern’s restorations reigniting a beautiful, historical detail at our nation’s Capitol. Outstanding!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices 

# Order

September 11, 2020

160809

- 10

CITY OF WAYNE RETIREES ASSOCIATION,

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, TIMOTHY

REYNOLDS, ROBERT ENGLISH, EDMUND

ROTHFELDER, DANIEL HAMANN , and

CHERYL FISHER, on behalf of themselves and

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 160809; 160810

COA: 343522; 343916

Wayne CC: 17

- 009118

- CK

CITY OF WAYNE,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

M C C ORMACK

, J

., ( concurring ).

I concur in this Court’s order denying leave to appeal because, as the Court of

Appeals recognized, the outcome in this case is resolved by our decision in Kendzierski v

Macomb Co , 503 Mich 296 (2019).

The issue in Kendzierski was whether retiree healthcare benefits provided through

the parties’ collective

- bargaining agreements (CBAs) were vested, i.e., unalterable for the

plaintiff

- retirees’ lifetimes, or were instead time

- lim ited promises that did not survive the

expiration of those CBAs.

As I explained in my dissent, I believe the CBAs in Kendzierski were ambiguous

and that the plaintiffs should have been allowed to present extrinsic evidence to resolve

that ambiguity. Kendzierski , 503 Mich at 327 ( M C C ORMACK

, C.J. , dissenting). But this

Court disagreed, concluding that the benefits were unambiguously time

- limited and that

the defendant was, therefore, entitled to summary disposition for that reason. Id . at 326

(opinion of the Court).I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 11, 2020

a0911 2

Clerk Plaintiffs in this case have offered arguments for ambiguity that are similar to

those the Court considered and rejected in Kendzierski . While I find these arguments to

be persuasive, plaintiffs have not asked us to reconsider our decision in Kendzierski . For

that reason, I concur in this Court’s order denying leave to appeal.

B ERNSTEIN

, J., joins the statement of M C C ORMACK , C.J.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51108

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE MANUEL VALDESPINO

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-813-1

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Manuel Valdespino

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 30, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51108

2

7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.