EXHIBIT 23.2




DeGolyer and MacNaughton


5001 Spring Valley Road


Suite 800 East


Dallas, Texas 75244







December 15, 2010





Nexen Inc.


801-7thAvenue S.W.


Calgary, AB


T2P 3P7




Attention: Reserves Review Committee of the Board of Directors of Nexen Inc.






Re:
DeGolyer and MacNaughton - Report of Third Party for certain United Kingdom properties with interests owned by Nexen Inc.




Ladies and Gentlemen:




Pursuant to your request, we have conducted an independent evaluation of Nexen Inc.’s (Nexen) proved and probable oil, condensate, natural gas liquids (NGL), and natural gas reserves, as of December 31, 2009, for certain fields owned by Nexen in the United Kingdom as shown in Table 1A. Nexen has represented that these properties account for 17 percent on an equivalent barrel basis of its proved reserves as of December 31, 2009, and that its reserves estimates have been prepared in accordance with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) definitions. We have reviewed information provided to us by Nexen that it represents to be its estimates of the reserves, as of December 31, 2009, for the same properties as those which we evaluated.




Reserves included herein are expressed as reserves as represented by Nexen. Gross reserves are defined as the total estimated petroleum to be produced from these properties after December 31, 2009. Working interest reserves are defined as that portion of the gross reserves attributable to the interests owned by Nexen after deducting all interests owned by others. Net reserves are defined as working interest reserves after deductions for royalties.




Estimates of oil, condensate, and NGL (collectively, Liquids), and natural gas should be regarded only as estimates that may change as further production history and additional






2


DeGolyer and MacNaughton




information become available. Not only are such reserves estimates based on that information which is currently available, but such estimates are also subject to the uncertainties inherent in the application of judgmental factors in interpreting such information.




Data used in this evaluation were obtained from reviews with Nexen personnel, Nexen files, from records on file with the appropriate regulatory agencies, and from public sources. In the preparation of this report we have relied, without independent verification, upon such information furnished by Nexen with respect to property interests, production from such properties, current costs of operation and development, prices for production, agreements relating to current and future operations and sale of production, and various other information and data that were accepted as represented. Furthermore, if in the course of our examination something came to our attention which brought into question the validity or sufficiency of any of such information or data, we did not rely on such information or data until we had satisfactorily resolved our questions relating thereto or had independently verified such information or data. A field examination of the properties was not considered necessary for the purposes of this report.




Methodology and Procedures




The process of estimating reserves requires complex judgments and decision-making based on available geological, geophysical, engineering, and economic data. To estimate the economically recoverable oil and natural gas reserves and related future net cash flows, we consider many factors and make assumptions including:




●
expected reservoir characteristics based on geological, geophysical, and engineering assessments;




●
future production rates based on historical performance and expected future operating and investment activities;




●
future oil and gas prices and quality differentials;




●
assumed effects of regulation by governmental agencies; and




●
future development and operating costs.




Our estimate is prepared using standard geological and engineering methods generally accepted by the petroleum industry, and the reserves definitions and standards required by the United States SEC. Generally accepted methods for estimating reserves include volumetric calculations, material balance techniques, production and pressure decline curve analysis, analogy with similar reservoirs, and reservoir simulation. The




3


DeGolyer and MacNaughton




method or combination of methods used is based on our professional judgment and experience.




Discovered oil and natural gas reserves are generally produced only when they are economically recoverable. As such, oil and gas prices and capital and operating costs have an impact on whether reserves will ultimately be produced. As required by United States SEC rules, reserves represent the quantities that are expected to be economically recoverable using existing prices and costs. Estimates may change substantially as additional data from ongoing development activities and production performance becomes available and as economic conditions impacting oil and gas prices and costs change.




The reserves estimates in this report are based upon 2009 first-of-the-month fiscal average pricing using benchmark pricing. Oil prices are based upon the Forties crude oil benchmark of U.S.$60.62 per barrel and Dated Brent of U.S.$60.85 per barrel, while gas prices are based upon the National Balancing Point benchmark of UK£0.32 per therm. Specific pricing for each field was adjusted for historical quality and transportation cost differentials, and for currency exchange rates. The resulting adjusted price is referred to as the “realized price.” For total proved reserves, the estimated average realized price is US$58.08 per barrel of oil and U.S.$3.57 per thousand cubic feet of gas, based upon a volume weighted average of the properties evaluated. For total probable reserves, the weighted average realized price for proved plus probable estimates of oil and gas reserves is U.S.$58.68 per barrel and U.S.$4.35 per thousand cubic feet, respectively.




Generally, operations are subject to various levels of government controls and regulations. These laws and regulations may include matters relating to land tenure, drilling, production practices, environmental protection, marketing and pricing policies, royalties, various taxes and levies including income tax, and foreign trade and investment that are subject to change from time to time. Current legislation is generally a matter of public record, and additional legislation or amendments that will affect reserves or when any such proposals, if enacted, might become effective generally cannot be predicted. Changes in government regulations could affect reserves or related economics. In the regions that are currently being evaluated, we believe we have applied existing regulations appropriately.




Certain properties in which Nexen has an interest are subject to the terms of various profit sharing or joint operating agreements. The terms of these agreements generally allow for working interest participants to be reimbursed for portions of capital costs and operating expenses and to share in the profits. The reimbursements and profit proceeds are converted to a barrel of oil equivalent or standard cubic foot of gas equivalent




4
 DeGolyer and MacNaughton






by dividing by product prices to determine the “entitlement reserves.” These entitlement reserves are equivalent in principle to net reserves and are used to calculate an equivalent net share, termed an “entitlement interest.” In this report, Nexen reserves or interest for certain properties subject to these agreements is the entitlement based on Nexen’s working interest.




Nexen Estimates




Nexen has represented that its estimated proved and probable reserves attributable to the evaluated properties are based on United States SEC definitions. It represents that its estimates of the reserves attributable to these properties represent 17 percent of its total company proved reserves and 14 percent of its total company probable reserves on an equivalent barrel basis and are as follows, expressed in thousands of barrels (Mbbl), millions of cubic feet (MMcf) and thousands of barrels of oil equivalent (Mboe):







Nexen’s estimate of Reserves as of December 31, 2009


Select Fields Evaluated by DeGolyer and MacNaughton




United Kingdom PropertiesLiquids


Natural Gas


Oil EquivalentNexen Reserves

(Mbbl)


(MMcf)


(Mboe)Working Interest Reserves (before royalties)Proved


169,450



17,126



172,304Probable


158,612



64,032



169,284Working Interest Reserves (after royalties)Proved


169,403



17,126



172,257Probable


158,250



64,032



168,923





Note:
Gas is converted to oil equivalent using a factor of 6,000 cubic feet of gas per 1 barrel of oil equivalent.






Reserves Audit Opinion




DeGolyer and MacNaughton has used all data, assumptions, procedures, and methods that it considers necessary to prepare this report.




In our opinion, the information relating to estimated net proved and net probable reserves of oil, condensate, natural gas liquids, and gas contained in this report has been prepared according to the definitions and disclosure guidelines required by the United States SEC within Paragraphs 932-235-50-4, 932-235-50-6, 932-235-50-7, and 932-235-50-9 of the Accounting Standards Update 932-235-50, Extractive Industries – Oil and Gas (Topic


5
 DeGolyer and MacNaughton




932): Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures (January 2010) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board and Rules 4–10(a) (1)–(32) of Regulation S–X and Rules 302(b), 1201, and 1202(a) (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (8) of Regulation S–K of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.




In comparing the detailed proved and proved-plus-probable reserves estimates prepared by us to those prepared by Nexen, we have found differences, both positive and negative. In our opinion, the proved and proved-plus-probable reserves for the reviewed properties as estimated by Nexen are, in aggregate when compared to our estimates on the basis of equivalent barrels, reasonable because each is within 10 percent of our estimates.




DeGolyer and MacNaughton is an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm that has been providing petroleum consulting services throughout the world for over 70 years. DeGolyer and MacNaughton does not have any financial interest, including stock ownership, in Nexen. Our fees were not contingent on the results of our evaluation. This letter report has been prepared at the request of Nexen.





Submitted,/s/  DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTONDeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTONTexas Registered Engineering Firm F-716





cc:
Mr. Craig BeattieV.P. Technical AssuranceNexen International DivisionMr. Brad KopasDeloitte & Touche LLP





/s/Lloyd W. Cade, P.E.[SEAL]
Lloyd W. Cade, P.E.Senior Vice PresidentDeGolyer and MacNaughton














6
 DeGolyer and MacNaughton









TABLE 1A


NEXEN FIELDS EVALUATED by DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON


as of


DECEMBER 31, 2009





PROPERTIES

FIELDSUnited Kingdom

BuzzardScottTelfordFarragonEttrickGolden Eagle AreaDuartRochelle