alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Randall K. Gausman, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tut Systems, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tut Systems, Inc.



By:

/s/    RANDALL K. GAUSMANRandall K. Gausman Vice-President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)




Date: October 30, 2003
# C_2016202EN.01008601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/86

---

Article 94

(ex Article 74 TEC)

(ex Article 74 TEC)

Any measures taken within the framework of the Treaties in respect of transport rates and conditions shall take account of the economic circumstances of carriers.

---
# C_2016203EN.01004301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/43

---

Article 171

1.   Estimates shall be drawn up for each financial year of all revenue and expenditure of the Community, other than those of the Agency and the Joint Undertakings, and such revenue and expenditure shall be shown either in the operating budget or in the research and investment budget.

The revenue and expenditure shown in each budget shall be in balance.

2.   The revenue and expenditure of the Agency, which shall operate in accordance with commercial principles, shall be budgeted for in a special account.

The manner of estimating, implementing and auditing such revenue and expenditure shall be laid down, with due regard to the statutes of the Agency, in financial regulations made pursuant to Article 322 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

3.   The estimates of revenue and expenditure, together with the operating accounts and the balance sheets of the Joint Undertakings for each financial year, shall be placed before the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament in accordance with the statutes of those undertakings.

---
# C_2016202EN.01035701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/357 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/357

---

59.   Declaration by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on Article 312 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on Article 312 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Kingdom of the Netherlands will agree to a decision as referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 312(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union once a revision of the decision referred to in the third paragraph of Article 311 of that Treaty has provided the Netherlands with a satisfactory solution for its excessive negative net payment position vis-à-vis the Union budget.

vis-à-vis

---
# C_2016202EN.01019401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/194 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/194

---

Article 343

(ex Article 291 TEC)

(ex Article 291 TEC)

The Union shall enjoy in the territories of the Member States such privileges and immunities as are necessary for the performance of its tasks, under the conditions laid down in the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the privileges and immunities of the European Union. The same shall apply to the European Central Bank and the European Investment Bank.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      12,753,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              137,357,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                59,534,000
<INVENTORY>                                 14,720,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           106,283,000
<PP&E>                                     184,749,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             123,921,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             401,744,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       51,222,000
<BONDS>                                    307,867,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       155,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,424,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               401,744,000
<SALES>                                     42,502,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            87,890,000
<CGS>                                       21,826,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,826,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            74,488,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             6,890,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,463,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (8,424,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   150,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (8,574,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (8,574,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.55)


</TABLE>
U. S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency

 NOTICE OF SALE OF WHEAT

FOR RELEASE AT 1:30 P.M. CT May 12, 2017

USDA’s Farm Service Agency today announced the sale of Hard Red Winter (HRW) Wheat. 

The HRW Wheat was sold under Announcement SMAC3, Invitation No. 3 dated May 1, 2017.

Warehouse Location Purchaser Bushels 

Sold

 Sold Price 

(per Bushel) CCC Revenue Commodity Type

Pratt, KS Kanza Cooperative 

Association

10,300.18 $3.70 $38,110.67 HRW Wheat

Apache, OK Equity Marketing 

Alliance Warehouse

24,856.72 $3.72 $92,467.00 HRW Wheat

Apache, OK Equity Marketing 

Alliance Warehouse

23,016.63 $3.72 $85,621.86 HRW Wheat
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          23,567,656
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,305,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                        58,592
<INVENTORY>                                      1,424,749
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,940,942
<PP&E>                                           1,824,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,222,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,651,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,577,560
<BONDS>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                           178,059
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,335,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,651,168
<SALES>                                          2,141,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,141,335
<CGS>                                              672,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,453,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    13,911
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,094,664
<INCOME-TAX>                                       431,986
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                662,678
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       662,678
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.04




</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Timothy Sherlock, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Vice President of Finance ofARI Network Services, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated: June 14, 2006     /s/ Timothy Sherlock         Timothy Sherlock    Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and VP of Finance
#### AGWILINES, Inc., as Owner of the S. S. "NORFOLK," Libellant-Appellee, v. Steamtug THE "BRIDGETON," The Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, Claimant-Appellant. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, as Owner of THE "C. R. R. OF N. J. CARFLOAT NO. 50," Libellant-Appellant, v. S. S. THE "NORFOLK," Agwilines, Inc., Claimant-Appellee.

Nos. 59, 60.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Oct. 30, 1939.

Macklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, of New York City (Leo F. Hanan, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and Adrian J. O’Kane, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, CHASE, and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decrees affirmed.
#### Sidney M. HAUPTMAN, Trustee of the Charles Nelson Co., a Corporation, Debtor, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK & UNION TRUST CO., a Corporation, and UNION SECURITIES CORPORATION, Appellees.

No. 8863.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 18, 1939.

Sterling Carr, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Sidney M. Ehrman, Albert M. Monaco and Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, DENMAN, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal in above cause dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.
#### Fred ZIER, Appellant (Defendant below), v. The CITY OF POWELL, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

No. 4417.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Sept. 4, 1974.

Fred Zier, pro se.

Hunter Patrick, Powell, for appellee.

ORDER

By The Court:

PARKER, Chief Justice.

Appellant, acting pro se, having filed herein certain papers which he apparently intended to be a brief on appeal but which were not so denominated and in no way complied with the Rules of the Supreme Court, and in particular Rule 12 thereof, and

Appellee thereafter having filed a motion for dismissal of appeal and the court having reviewed the matter and found that the time for appellant to file brief had not then expired and that appellant therefore had an opportunity to correct any deficiency in his brief, wrote appellee accordingly, sending a copy of the letter to appellant by certified mail, and

Appellant thereafter failing to avail himself of the opportunity to file a brief which complied with the court’s rules but instead filing what he entitled, “Appellant’s Answer to Appellee’s Motion for Dismissal of Appeal,” and

The court now having reviewed the entire situation finds that the papers filed by appellant totally fail to comply with the Rules of the Supreme Court, that they contain nothing to which appellee can intelligently respond, and that notwithstanding certain leniency which the court accords to anyone acting pro se the proper administration of justice requires reasonable adherence to the rules and requirements of the court.

It is, therefore, ordered that the appel-lee’s motion for dismissal of the appeal be, and the same is, granted; the appeal is dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 10(xv)**Summary of Bonus PlanCamco Financial Corporation (“Camco”) maintains both a short-term cash bonus plan and a long-termstock-based incentive plan. Bonus and incentive plan awards for executive officers of Camco and itssubsidiaries are based on the achievement of corporate performance objectives which are establishedannually by Camco’s Compensation Committee at the beginning of each year. Currently, theperformance objectives consist of minimum thresholds that must be met under the followingperformance measures before cash or equity incentives will be paid to the Named Executive Officers,regardless of the results of the other performance measurements: nonperforming loans as percent ofassets, liquidity, deposit growth, earnings per share, business loan growth and relationshipbuilding (products and services per customer). The individual objectives are then weighted as tovalue each year, with the most important goals having heavier weightings as decided by managementand the Board of Directors.Currently, the cash bonus amounts range from 15% to 20% of the Chief Executive Officer’s basesalary and 15% to 20% of other executive officers’ base salaries, subject to the percentage ofperformance measurements achieved. Additional discretionary bonus amounts may also be awarded underthe cash bonus plan in recognition of other achievements, such as merger and acquisitionactivities, which are not part of the established performance objectives.The long-term incentive plan provides for the award of stock options of varying levels for each ofthe executive officers, ranging in amount from 0% to a maximum of 100% of the officer’s basesalary, subject to the percentage of performance measurements achieved. Options are issued atmarket prices, have a term of ten years, and typically vest at a rate of 20% each year beginning onthe grant date. This element of the executive compensation program is designed to align theinterests of the executive with corporate stockholder objectives since the price performance ofCamco’s common stock directly affects the value of these long-term awards.
**Exhibit 32.1**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of infoUSA Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, (i) this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company**.**   Date: November 9, 2004 */s/ Vinod Gupta* Vinod Gupta, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Roy W.
Olivier, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ARI Network Services,
Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the periods covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:
 
 (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the periods in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periods covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
 
 5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.
 
 Dated:  June
16, 2008
 
 
 /s/  Roy W.
    OlivierRoy
      W. OlivierPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
#### Scott E. Woodworth et al., Respondents, v Susan O. Delgrand, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: The judgment of Supreme Court should be affirmed. Defendant argues that the contract of sale merged into the deed. That issue was not raised in the trial court and, therefore, is not preserved for our review. In any event, the doctrine of merger does not apply.

Defendant agreed to convey property sufficient to enable plaintiffs to park four cars. The parties agreed that an area of 20 by 40 feet was adequate and the contract of sale described the property by those dimensions. Defendant then instructed the surveyor to measure the lot from a certain line, which included property she did not own. Defendant knew she did not own all the property and was aware that plaintiffs would not receive the full 20 by 40 feet contracted for. Defendant’s actions were tantamount to fraud and, for this reason, the contract was not merged into the deed *(see, Lawlor v Engley,*166 AD2d 799; *Sherman Partners Assocs. v 272 Sherman Assocs.,*160 AD2d 992; *Snyder v Potter,*134 AD2d 664; *Welch v Shiffman,*101 AD2d 948, *lv denied*63 NY2d 609). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Cicoria, *1012J.—Specific Performance.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.