alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ARI Network Services, Inc. (the “Company”); |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  June 14, 2011 |                                  |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                            | /s/ Roy W. Olivier                    |
|                            | Roy W. Olivier                        |
|                            | President and Chief Executive Officer |

----
No. 03-14-00740-CR 

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL

DISTRICT

§

v. § COURT OF APPEALS

§

ARMANDO OCHOA § AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

APPELLANT’S RESPONSE TO LATE BRIEF NOTICE 

AND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes ARMANDO OCHOA, Appellant in the above styled and

numbered cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time of 30 days to file

appellant's brief, pursuant to Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,

and for good cause shows the following:

1. This case is on appeal from the 299TH Judicial District Court of Travis 

County, Texas. The case below was styled the State of Texas v. Armando Ochoa, 

numbered D-1-DC- 14 - 202835. 

2. Appellant was convicted of the offense of Assault – Family Violence 

he received a sentence of 14 years. He is currently incarcerated.

 April 9, 2015 and is overdue. 

4. Appellant requests a 30 - day extension of time from the present date to

1

ACCEPTED

03-14-00740-CR

4950912

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/20/2015 12:16:43 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/20/2015 12:16:43 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
file the brief. He has received no previous extensions on these cases.

5. Appellant relies on the following facts as good cause for the requested

extension. In addition to the present case, the undersigned counsel has been working

on the following appellate and post-conviction cases which have interfered with his

preparation of the present case:

a. Randy Halprin v. William Stephens – counsel has been to a

federal post-conviction writ from a capital case and has been

assiduously attempting to obtain and review the appellate record in order

to prepare a response to the State’s Answer.

b. State of Texas v. Antonio Martinez – brief filed in this Court on

March 23, 2015.

6. In the present case, counsel has completed his review of the appellate

record and is researching and evaluating potential issues to raise in the brief. For

this reason, counsel seeks an extension of time in order to adequately fulfill his

obligations under the 6 and 14 Amendments to the United States Constitution. th th

WHEREFORE,PREMISESCONSIDERED,Appellant prays that this Court

grant this Motion To Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief for 30 additional days

form the filing of this motion, and for such other and further relief as the Court may

deem appropriate.

2
Respectfully submitted,

Law Office of Alexander L. Calhoun

4301 W. William Cannon Dr., B-150, # 260

Austin, TX 78749

Tele: 512/ 420- 8850

Fax: 512/ 233-5946

Cell: 512/731-3159

Email: alcalhoun@earthlink.net

BY:__/s/_Alexander L. Calhoun 

Alexander L. Calhoun

State Bar No.: 00787187

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on April 20, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above

and foregoing document was served by U.S. Mail on the State at the following

address:

Travis County District Attorney’s Office

P.O. Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767

 /s/ Alexander L. Calhoun 

Alexander L. Calhoun

3
# C_2016203EN.01003201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/32

---

Article 79

The Commission shall require that operating records be kept and produced in order to permit accounting for ores, source materials and special fissile materials used or produced. The same requirement shall apply in the case of the transport of source materials and special fissile materials.

Those subject to such requirements shall notify the authorities of the Member State concerned of any communications they make to the Commission pursuant to Article 78 and to the first paragraph of this Article.

The nature and the extent of the requirements referred to in the first paragraph of this Article shall be defined in a regulation made by the Commission and approved by the Council.

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
OBELIN JAIMES-AVILES, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-858 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed January 16, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Mark F. Carpanini, Judge. Obelin Jaimes-Aviles, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7766

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JONATHON TERRELL PATTERSON, a/k/a Joe-Joe,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-12)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathon Terrell Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard 

Ascik, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Asheville, North Carolina; John George Guise, Thomas A. 

O’Malley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jonathon Terrell Patterson appeals the district court’s 

order granting his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

(2012) for a sentence reduction.* We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Patterson, No. 5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-12 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The district court granted Patterson’s § 3582(c)(2) 

motion, but did not reduce his sentence to the full extent he 

requested.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FISCAL YEAR
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,237
<SECURITIES>                                       139
<RECEIVABLES>                                      323
<ALLOWANCES>                                        46
<INVENTORY>                                        878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,560
<PP&E>                                             940
<DEPRECIATION>                                     721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              505
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,128
<OTHER-SE>                                         317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,950
<SALES>                                          3,993
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,931
<CGS>                                            2,768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     38
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        38
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (the “Report”),
I, John A Hardy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                              
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 12, 2015 |  | /s/ John A. Hardy                            
|                       |  | John A. Hardy
        Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Timothy Sherlock, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and VicePresident of Finance of ARI Network Services, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI NetworkServices, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: December 15, 2004
/s/ Timothy Sherlock
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0542 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. FRANK WEBB,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kelley A. Barstad is granted an extension of time to and including January 20, 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 22 2022

12/22/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0542
Agricultural Marketing Service, Specialty Crops Program, Specialty Crops Inspection Division

This PATCH represents official guidance. This PATCH is scheduled to be incorporated into the 

document listed above. After incorporation into the document listed above this PATCH will 

become obsolete. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

PATCH # 039 Reporting Brix-Acid Ratio (November 6, 2018)

SCI Division Inspection Series

Page 1 of 1

PATCH # 039

DOCUMENT:

• Oranges and Grapefruit Market Inspection Instructions for Citrus Grown in Texas and 

States Other Than Florida, California, and Arizona October 1969; 

• Oranges and Grapefruit Shipping Point Inspection Instructions for Citrus Grown in Texas 

and States Other Than Florida, California, and Arizona October 1978; 

• Florida Citrus Shipping Point and Market Inspection Instructions September 2000; and

• Citrus California and Arizona Shipping Point and Market Inspection Instructions March 

2005.

REMARKS: The following information will be inserted into the “Maturity” sections of the 

above mentioned instructions.

When a Brix (Solids)-Acid Ratio Test is performed on a lot of citrus and the lot fails account of 

not meeting the required brix (solids) to acid ratio, report the fact in the grade statement. For 

example, “Fails to grade U.S. No. 1 account maturity (brix-acid ratio).” In the “Remarks” or 

“Other” section of the certificate report the brix-acid ratio that was determined.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply1166Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Michael Lilly (not verified)PermalinkJuly 8, 2020 - 3:47pmTHANK YOU again for showing us the room renovations,  a dedicated group of craftsman to complete this task.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
EXHIBIT 24.19
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned,  as Controller of West Texas Utilities Company (the "Company"),
hereby  makes,  constitutes  and  appoints  Paul J.  Brower  his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power and authority to execute in the name
and on behalf  of the  undersigned,  in any and all  capacities,  the  Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1999 and any and all  amendments  thereto,  to be
filed under the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as  amended,  and any other
documents and  instruments  incidental  thereto,  and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities
and Exchange Commission,  hereby granting to such  attorney-in-fact,  and agent,
full power and authority of substitution and revocation in the premises and full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary  to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully for all  intents and
purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person and hereby ratifying and
confirming all that such  attorney-in-fact and agent, may do or cause to be done
by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have hereunto  executed this Power of Attorney this 25th
day of January, 2000.


                                                /s/ R. Russell Davis
                                                R. Russell Davis
                                                Controller


Subscribed and sworn to before me this 25th day of January, 2000 by R.
Russell Davis.


                                                /s/ Kit Hill
                                                Notary Public
                                                State of Oklahoma

My Commission Expires:  June 14, 2001
#### Harvey M. HAWKINS, Appellant (Defendant below), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

No. 4759.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Nov. 10,1977.

Kermit C. Brown, Rawlins, and Gerald M. Gallivan, Director, Wyoming Defender Aid Program, Laramie, for appellant.

V. Frank Mendicino, Atty. Gen., Gerald A. Stack, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Allen C. Johnson, Law Clerk, Cheyenne, for appel-lee.

John E. Stanfield, Hugh B. McFadden, Jr., and Terry Mackey, Laramie, Amicus Curiae Committee, Wyoming Trial Lawyers Ass’n, filed brief and presented oral argument.

Before GUTHRIE, C. J., and McCLIN-TOCK, RAPER, THOMAS and ROSE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case is dismissed under the authority of *Jackson v. State,*Wyo., 547 P.2d 1203 (1976).
~>\\ COURT OF APPEALS, Fl
°°) 301 Fannin Street ij

U.S. POSTAGE >> Prtney Bowes
(G7 cBecambet BaF:

YY ——

Be 770°? $ 000.34°

0001372104DEC 23 2014

RE: Case Nofwiirid-00894-cR

Style: Juan Cerda Alvarado
v. The State of Texas

On December 23, 2014, the Court today GRANT court reporter's(s) request
for extension of time to athe te reporter's record in the referenced cause
to and including January 23, 2z5e

4,

T. C. Case ¥ 11-DCR-058831 & 9 ssopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court

abo,

Ss
1410 Wi is way Boys Ox.
Richm 77469 SP “Og

66-09-27 |
Wallethas