### Request to Use CARES for Larger/Older Persons

I am writing to request an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent required for Niara Pare to be able to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System even though she exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. In addition, if my petition is granted, I request that any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Niara Pare is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)( B) to the extent necessary to allow Niara to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint system during use of that child restraint system aboard an aircraft.

I believe the pertinent section from 14 CFR part 121 from which we seek relief is Section 121.311 Seats, safety belts, and shoulder harnesses.

My ( **daughter**

) is 16 year’s old, weighs

_75 pounds, and is 57 inches tall. My **daughter**’s physical condition is as follows ( **She has Cerebral Palsy, is fully dependant and uses a wheelchair**  **. She needs full support at all times.**  As a result of **her** physical condition, **she** needs the support and security provided by an FAA Approved Child Restraint, but because of ( **her** weight is incapable of compliance with the regulation.

I understand that the regulation is written to create a high level of safety for each individual passenger by ensuring that they are securely restrained in their seats during all phases of flight. The regulation also ensures that an individual does not cause harm to other pass engers on the airplane by being thrown into them during turbulent or emergency conditions.

I propose that ( **Niara Pare** ) be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though **she** exceeds the manufacturer’s we ight limits. This ensures a high level of safety for Niara and a high level of safety for the other passengers and crew on the airplane. In fact, in Niara ’s case, safety is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide during the entire flight.

Enhancing safety for Niara is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest is also served by the fact that the use of this FAA Approved ChildRestraint System allows **her** to use commercial air transportation. W ithout

the support and security of the FAA Approved Child Restraint System, (**she/he** ) would be unable to fly commercially.

I also believe that, with certain limitations established by the FAA in a grant to this petiti on, there can be an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the affected regulation. The CARES restraint has been certified by the manufacturer for use by children 22

- 44 pounds. However, the components of the CARES restraint are the same as those u sed in restraints for adults on aircraft and would maintain their integrity if used by someone who weighed several hundred pounds.

I believe that the limit of 44 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of the child attached to the seatba ck, the seatback would move forward more quickly in an accident scenario and this might cause a higher HIC load for the person seated in the seat behind the passenger using the CARES restraint (because the seatback moving forward more quickly would mean th at it would not be there to attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated behind the person using the CARES restraint).

In order to achieve an equivalent level of safety as that provided by the affected regulation, I propose that the FAA establ ish a limitation in a grant to this petition that Niara only sits in a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind her. Therefore, no unsafe condition would exist for a passenger seated behind Niara while **she** is using the CARES restraint. I also propose that all operations under this exemption be conducted with at least one of **Niara’s** parents or a caregiver accompanying him or her. In addition, I propose that Niara’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption.

I also request that the process ing of this petition not be delayed for publication and comment in the Fed eral Register. W e want to travel **August 12, 2012; August 19, 2012 dates**  ). If you take the time to put this in the Federal Register, it will delay the process and we may not be able to travel in this timeframe.

If it is necessary to put a summary in the Federal Register, I submit thefollowing:

This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System on an aircraft, even though the child exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. Due to physical challenges, without the support and security of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System, this child would be unable to fly. W e request that this child be allowed to occ upy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though **she** exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safety of this child is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide for **her** during the flight.