Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules 24643 

both large and small, were able to 

express views on this issue. Finally, 

interested persons are invited to submit 

comments on this proposed rule, 

including the regulatory and 

informational impacts of this action on 

small businesses. 

A small business guide on complying 

with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop 

marketing agreements and orders may 

be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/ 

MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. 

Any questions about the compliance 

guide should be sent to Laurel May at 

the previously mentioned address in the 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section. 

A 15-day comment period is provided 

to allow interested persons to respond 

to this proposal. Fifteen days is deemed 

appropriate because the Board would 

like to have this rule in place as soon 

as possible so handlers can consider 

these changes when making plans for 

the upcoming season. Further, handlers 

are aware of these proposed changes, 

which were discussed and 

recommended at public meetings and 

interested parties had the opportunity to 

provide input. All written comments 

timely received will be considered 

before a final determination is made on 

this matter. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 930 

Marketing agreements, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Tart 

cherries. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 7 CFR part 930 is proposed to 

be amended as follows: 

PART 930—TART CHERRIES GROWN 

IN THE STATES OF MICHIGAN, NEW 

YORK, PENNSYLVANIA, OREGON, 

UTAH, WASHINGTON, AND 

WISCONSIN 

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 930 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 

2. A new § 930.150 is added to read 

as follows: 

§ 930.150 Primary inventory reserve. 

Beginning July 1, 2012, the primary 

inventory reserve may not to exceed 100 

million pounds. 

3. Section 930.162 is amended by 

adding a sentence at the end of section 

(b)(2) to read as follows: 

§ 930.162 Exemptions. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(2) * * * In addition, shipments of 

tart cherries or tart cherry products in 

new market development and market 

expansion outlets are eligible for 

handler diversion credit for a period of 

one year from the handler’s first date of 

shipment into such outlets. 

* * * * * 

Dated: April 17, 2012. 

David R. Shipman, 

Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9860 Filed 4–24–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2012–0421; Directorate 

Identifier 2012–NM–042–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. 

This proposed AD was prompted by a 

report of in-flight fracture of the right 

windshield (window 1) on the flight 

deck and multiple reports of electrical 

arcs at the terminal blocks of the flight 

deck windshields resulting in smoke 

and fire. This proposed AD would 

require repetitive inspections of 

electrical heat terminals on the left and 

right windshields for damage, and 

corrective actions if necessary. This 

proposed AD would also allow for 

replacing an affected windshield with a 

windshield equipped with different 

electrical connections, which would 

terminate the repetitive inspections for 

that windshield. We are proposing this 

AD to prevent smoke and fire in the 

flight deck, which can lead to loss of 

visibility, and injuries to or 

incapacitation of the flight crew. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by June 11, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124– 

2207; telephone 206–544–5000, 

extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; email 

me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet 

https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may review copies of the referenced 

service information at the FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. 

For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227– 

1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elias Natsiopoulos, Aerospace Engineer, 

Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM– 

130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification 

Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, Washington 98057–3356; 

phone: 425–917–6478; fax: 425–917– 

6590; email: 

Elias.Natsiopoulos@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposal. Send your comments to 

an address listed under the ADDRESSES

section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 

2012–0421; Directorate Identifier 2012– 

NM–042–AD’’ at the beginning of your 

comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
24644 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

We have received nine reports from 

eight operators that electrical arcs 

occurred at the lower terminal blocks of 

the flight deck windshields. AD 2010– 

15–01, Amendment 39–16367 (75 FR 

39804, July 13, 2010), addresses the 

lower electrical connections. We have 

also received reports of four failures of 

upper terminal blocks on Model 757 

airplanes. In more than one incident, 

the arcs resulted in open flames. While 

in flight, one Model 757–200 series 

airplane experienced smoke in the 

cockpit, followed by the fracture of the 

inner pane of the first officer’s 

windshield (right window 1). This 

windshield fracture resulted in total loss 

of the first officer’s outside visibility 

and small shards of glass striking the 

first officer. Examination of the 

fractured windshield revealed evidence 

of arcing at the upper outboard (J1) and 

the upper inboard (J4) windshield 

electrical heat terminal connections. 

The inner pane fracture initiated 

beneath the J4 terminal block. 

The electrical connections on the 

windshields are made with lugs that 

attach with screws to the terminal block. 

A loose connection increases the heat at 

the terminal, which can cause damage 

to the internal joints (including solder, 

if present). Damaged solder joints are 

the primary cause of the electrical arcs. 

The primary cause of loose connections 

is the incorrectly torqued or incorrectly 

installed screw. This condition, if not 

corrected, could result in smoke and fire 

in the flight deck, which can result in 

the loss of visibility, and injuries to or 

incapacitation of the flightcrew. 

Other Related Rulemaking 

On July 6, 2010, the FAA issued AD 

2010–15–01, Amendment 39–16367 (75 

FR 39804, July 13, 2010), applicable to 

certain Boeing Model 757, 767, and 777 

series airplanes, which requires 

repetitive inspections for damage of the 

electrical terminal (J5 terminal) at the 

left and right flight deck window 1 

windshield, and corrective actions if 

necessary. The most forward flight deck 

windows are referred to as windshields 

and named left and right window 1 

respectively. The actions required by 

that AD are intended to prevent smoke 

and fire in the cockpit, which could 

lead to loss of visibility, and injuries to 

or incapacitation of the flight crew. 

Accomplishing the actions in this 

proposed AD would terminate the 

requirements of AD 2010–15–01 for 

Model 757 airplanes. 

Relevant Service Information 

We reviewed Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 757–30– 

0019, Revision 3, dated December 16, 

2011 (for Model 757–200, –200PF, and 

–200CB series airplanes); and Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 757– 

30–0020, Revision 3, dated December 

16, 2011 (for Model 757–300 series 

airplanes). This service information 

describes procedures for repetitive 

detailed inspections for damage 

(including, but not limited to, arcing, 

loose terminals, heat damage, crossthreaded connections, and cracking) of 

the wiring and electrical terminals J1, 

J4, and J5 at the left and right flight deck 

windshields; and corrective actions if 

necessary. 

The corrective actions include 

applying correct torque to a loose 

electrical connection, replacing any 

damaged terminal lug with a new lug, 

repairing damaged wiring, and replacing 

an unserviceable windshield with a new 

or serviceable windshield. Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 757– 

30–0019, Revision 3, dated December 

16, 2011 (for Model 757–200, –200PF, 

and –200CB series airplanes); and 

Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 757–30–0020, Revision 3, dated 

December 16, 2011 (for Model 757–300 

series airplanes); specify that the 

replacement windshield can be either a 

new or serviceable windshield that uses 

screws and lugs for the electrical 

connection, or a new or serviceable 

windshield that uses pins and sockets 

for the electrical connections. 

For airplanes on which a new 

windshield that uses pins and sockets is 

installed, Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 757–30–0019, Revision 

3, dated December 16, 2011 (for Model 

757–200, –200PF, and –200CB series 

airplanes); and Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 757–30–0020, Revision 

3, dated December 16, 2011 (for Model 

757–300 series airplanes); also specify 

changing the related wire bundle and 

cutting the bulb seal to give clearance 

for terminals on the replacement 

windshield. This service information 

specifies that installing a windshield 

that uses pins and sockets for the 

electrical connections eliminates the 

need for the repetitive detailed 

inspections for that windshield. 

Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 757–30–0019, Revision 3, dated 

December 16, 2011 (for Model 757–200, 

–200PF, and –200CB series airplanes); 

and Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 757–30–0020, Revision 3, dated 

December 16, 2011 (for Model 757–300 

series airplanes); also specify repetitive 

detailed inspections for damage of any 

windshield that is replaced with a 

windshield that uses screws and lugs for 

the heat connection, or if a windshield 

heat power connection is reassembled 

on windshields that use screws and lugs 

for the heat connection. 

FAA’s Determination 

We are proposing this AD because we 

evaluated all the relevant information 

and determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of the same 

type design. 

Proposed AD Requirements 

This proposed AD would require 

accomplishing the actions specified in 

the service information described 

previously, except as discussed under 

‘‘Differences Between the Proposed AD 

and the Service Information.’’ 

Differences Between the Proposed AD 

and the Service Information 

Although Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 757–30–0019, Revision 

3, dated December 16, 2011 (for Model 

757–200, –200PF, and –200CB series 

airplanes); and Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 757–30–0020, Revision 

3, dated December 16, 2011 (for Model 

757–300 series airplanes); recommend 

accomplishing certain inspections, 

window replacement, and reassembly of 

the electrical connections within 500 

flight hours or 150 days, whichever 

occurs first, we have determined that a 

compliance time of within 500 flight 

hours after the effective date of this AD 

addresses the identified unsafe 

condition soon enough to ensure an 

adequate level of safety for the affected 

fleet. This difference has been 

coordinated with The Boeing Company. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 664 airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this proposed AD: 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules 24645 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on 

U.S. operators 

Detailed inspection of 

windshields.

3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 per inspection cycle.$0 $255 per inspection 

cycle.

$169,320 per inspection 

cycle. 

We estimate the following costs to do 

any necessary corrective actions that 

would be required based on the results 

of the proposed inspection. We have no 

way of determining the number of 

aircraft that might need these corrective 

actions. 

ON-CONDITION COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product 

Windshield replacement and changes to related wiring 

including lug replacement.

9 work-hours × $85 per 

hour = $765 per windshield.

$19,687 per windshield ..... $20,452 per windshield. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 

2012–0421; Directorate Identifier 2012– 

NM–042–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by June 11, 

2012. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD affects AD 2010–15–01, 

Amendment 39–16367 (75 FR 39804, July 13, 

2010). 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

airplanes, certificated in any category, as 

identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of 

this AD. 

(1) Model 757–200, –200PF, and –200CB 

airplanes identified in Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 757–30–0019, 

Revision 3, dated December 16, 2011. 

(2) Model 757–300 airplanes identified in 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

757–30–0020, Revision 3, dated December 

16, 2011. 

(d) Subject 

Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/ 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of America 

Code 30, Ice and Rain Protection. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by a report of inflight fracture of the right windshield 

(window 1) on the flightdeck and multiple 

reports of electrical arcs at the terminal 

blocks of the flight deck windshields 

resulting in smoke and fire. We are issuing 

this AD to prevent smoke and fire in the 

flight deck, which can lead to loss of 

visibility, and injuries to or incapacitation of 

the flight crew. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Inspection and Repair 

Within 500 flight hours after the effective 

date of this AD, except as required by 

paragraph (h) of this AD: Do a detailed 

inspection for damage of the wiring and 

electrical terminal blocks (J1, J4, and J5 

terminals) at the left and right flight deck 

window 1 windshield, and do all applicable 

corrective actions, by accomplishing all the 

applicable actions specified in the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 757–30– 

0019, Revision 3, dated December 16, 2011 

(for Model 757–200, –200PF, and –200CB 

series airplanes); or Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 757–30–0020, Revision 3, 

dated December 16, 2011 (for Model 757–300 

series airplanes). Except as provided by 

paragraph (j) of this AD, do all applicable 

corrective actions before further flight. 

Repeat the detailed inspection thereafter at 

the applicable interval specified in paragraph 

(g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD. Doing the 

replacement specified in paragraph (k) of this 

AD terminates the repetitive inspection 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
24646 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

requirements of this paragraph for that 

replaced flight deck windshield. 

(1) For flight deck windshields 

manufactured by GKN Aerospace (GKN) with 

screw/lug electrical connections, repeat the 

detailed inspection thereafter at intervals not 

to exceed 12,000 flight hours or 48 months, 

whichever occurs later. 

(2) For flight deck windshields 

manufactured by PPG Aerospace (PPG) with 

screw/lug electrical connections, repeat the 

detailed inspection thereafter at intervals not 

to exceed 6,000 flight hours or 24 months, 

whichever occurs later. 

(h) Compliance Time Exception for Previous 

Inspection 

For airplanes on which inspections of the 

J1, J4, and J5 terminals, as specified in the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 757–30– 

0019, Revision 2, dated April 19, 2010 (for 

Model 757–200, –200PF, and –200CB series 

airplanes); or Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 757–30–0020, Revision 2, 

dated March 31, 2010 (for Model 757–300 

series airplanes); were accomplished before 

the effective date of this AD: Do the actions 

required by paragraph (g) of this AD at the 

applicable compliance time specified in 

paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD. 

Repeat the inspection thereafter at the 

applicable intervals specified in paragraphs 

(g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD. 

(1) For flight deck windshields 

manufactured by GKN with screw/lug 

electrical connections: At the later of the 

times specified in paragraphs (h)(1)(i) and 

(h)(1)(ii) of this AD. 

(i) Within 12,000 flight hours or 48 

months, whichever occurs later, after 

accomplishing the inspection. 

(ii) Within 500 flight hours after the 

effective date of this AD. 

(2) For flight deck windshields 

manufactured by PPG with screw/lug 

electrical connections: At the later of the 

times specified in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) and 

(h)(2)(ii) of this AD. 

(i) Within 6,000 flight hours or 24 months, 

whichever occurs later, after accomplishing 

the inspection. 

(ii) Within 500 flight hours after the 

effective date of this AD. 

(i) Inspection for Replaced Windshield or 

Reassembled Heat Power Connection 

For any windshield replaced after the 

effective date of this AD with a windshield 

that uses screws and lugs for electrical heat 

connection, or if a windshield heat power 

connection is reassembled on windshields 

that use screws and lugs for windshield heat 

connections: Do the actions required in 

paragraph (g) of this AD within 500 flight 

hours after the windshield replacement or 

connection reassembly, and thereafter at the 

applicable interval specified in paragraph 

(g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable. 

(j) Exception to Compliance Time for Certain 

Windshield Replacement 

If, during the inspection required by 

paragraph (g) or (i) of this AD, the screw is 

found cross threaded: Do the applicable 

actions specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) 

of this AD. 

(1) If the terminal lug is loose and cannot 

be tightened: Before further flight, replace 

that windshield, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 757–30– 

0019, Revision 3, dated December 16, 2011 

(for Model 757–200, –200PF, and –200CB 

series airplanes); or Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 757–30–0020, Revision 3, 

dated December 16, 2011 (for Model 757–300 

series airplanes). 

(2) If the terminal lug is tight or can be 

tightened: Replace that windshield within 

500 flight hours after the inspection, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 757–30–0019, Revision 3, dated 

December 16, 2011 (for Model 757–200, 

–200PF, and –200CB series airplanes); or 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

757–30–0020, Revision 3, dated December 

16, 2011 (for Model 757–300 series 

airplanes). 

(k) Optional Terminating Action 

Replacing a flight deck windshield that 

uses screws and lugs for the electrical 

connections with a flight deck windshield 

that uses pins and sockets for the electrical 

connections, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 757–30– 

0019, Revision 3, dated December 16, 2011 

(for Model 757–200, –200PF, and –200CB 

series airplanes); or Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 757–30–0020, Revision 3, 

dated December 16, 2011 (for Model 757–300 

series airplanes); ends the repetitive 

inspection requirements of paragraph (g) of 

this AD for that windshield. 

(l) Related AD Termination 

Accomplishing the actions required by this 

AD terminates the requirements of AD 2010– 

15–01, Amendment 39–16367 (75 FR 39804, 

July 13, 2010), paragraphs (g), (j), and (k), for 

that airplane only. 

(m) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for the 

actions required by this AD, if those actions 

were performed before the effective date of 

this AD using Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 757–30–0019, Revision 2, 

dated April 19, 2010 (for Model 757–200, 

–200PF, and –200CB series airplanes); or 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

757–30–0020, Revision 2, dated March 31, 

2010 (for Model 757–300 series airplanes). 

(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in the 

Related Information section of this AD. 

Information may be emailed to: 9–ANM– 

Seattle–ACO–AMOC–Requests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(o) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Elias Natsiopoulos, Aerospace 

Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, 

ANM–130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; 

phone: 425–917–6478; fax: 425–917–6590; 

email: Elias.Natsiopoulos@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone 

206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766– 

5680; email me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet 

https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may 

review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

Washington. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 5, 

2012. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9916 Filed 4–24–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

18 CFR Part 40 

[Docket Nos. AD12–14–000 and AD11–11– 

000] 

Open Access and Priority Rights on 

Interconnection Facilities 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, DOE. 

ACTION: Notice of Inquiry. 

SUMMARY: In this Notice of Inquiry, the 

Commission seeks comment on open 

access and priority rights for capacity on 

interconnection facilities. 

DATES: Comments are due June 11, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by docket number and in 

accordance with the requirements 

posted on the Commission’s Web site, 

http://www.ferc.gov. Comments may be 

submitted by any of the following 

methods: 

• Agency Web Site: Documents 

created electronically using word 

processing software should be filed in 

native applications or print-to-PDF 

format and not in a scanned format, at 

http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ 

efiling.asp. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1