alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12722Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Michael S Burd  (not verified)PermalinkOctober 10, 2023 - 1:51pmYou left us hanging - what, if anything, are they used for today?
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Coleman, Willis and Bray 

Argued at Norfolk, Virginia 

GEORGE FREDERICK DELANEY 

v. Record No. 0594-94-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

 JUDGE RICHARD S. BRAY 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA JULY 5, 1995 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH 

Edward W. Hanson, Jr., Judge 

 Theresa B. Berry (Samford & Berry, on brief), for 

 appellant. 

 Robert B. Beasley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General 

 (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), 

 for appellee. 

 George Frederick Delaney (defendant) was convicted by jury on 

an indictment which charged concealment, third offense, a felony 

pursuant to Code § 18.2-104. Defendant contends on appeal that the 

indictment was not a proper vehicle to initiate and sustain the 

felony prosecution and, therefore, the court erroneously admitted 

evidence of prior convictions for "like offenses," elements of the 

felony. We disagree and affirm the conviction. 

 The indictment in issue alleged unlawful concealment of "goods 

or merchandise . . . [after] having previously been convicted at 

least twice within the Commonwealth . . . of like offenses," a 

felony in violation of former Code § 18.2-104(b). The former 

statute further provided that the predicate convictions 

indispensable to the felony must be specified "in the warrant or 

information." Id. (emphasis added). Because the instant offense 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

was charged by indictment, defendant argues that the Commonwealth 

"did not commence prosecution" for the felony in accordance with 

the statute. Defendant, therefore, reasons that he was before the 

court only "on a charge of misdemeanor concealment," and the prior 

convictions were irrelevant and inadmissible with respect to that 

offense.1 

 Rule 3A:9 provides, in pertinent part, that 

[d]efenses and objections based on defects in the 

institution of the prosecution or in the written charge 

upon which the accused is to be tried . . . must be 

raised by motion made . . . at least 7 days before the 

day fixed for trial . . . . Failure to present any such 

defense or objection . . . shall constitute a waiver

thereof. 

Id. (b),(c) (emphasis added). Defendant's challenge to the 

efficacy of the indictment clearly constitutes a "defense[]" or 

"objection[] based on [a] defect[] in the institution of the 

prosecution" of the instant offense. Rule 3A:9(b). However, 

defendant did not raise this issue until the day of trial, thereby 

waiving "such defense or objection." Id.

 Accordingly, we affirm the conviction. 

 Affirmed. 

 

 1Former Code § 18.2-104 was subsequently amended to expressly 

reference "warrant, indictment or information." Code § 18.2-104.
#### County of Maui v. K M Hawaii Inc.

18292

5/16/96

Denied

81 Hawai'i 248, 915 P.2d 1349
|    |                                                                             |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Charming Shoppes, Inc. |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Date:  | May 24, 2012 | /S/ ERIC M. SPECTER |
|   |   | Eric M. Specter |
|   |   | Executive Vice President |
|   |   | Principal Financial Officer |
***Cagle’s-Keystone Foods LLC***

*Financial Statements for the 52-Week Periods Ended December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002*

*and Independent Auditors’ Report*

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT**

Steering Committee of Cagle’s-Keystone Foods LLC: 

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Cagle’s-Keystone Foods LLC (the “Company”), which is owned 70% by Executive Holdings L.P. and 30% by Cagle’s Inc., as of December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002 and the related statements of operations, members’ equity, and cash flows for the 52-week periods then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the 52-week periods then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

April 9, 2004 

****
26129

#### Dubois v. Association of Apartment Owners of 2987 Kalakaua

Affirmed
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06929

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

06929\06929_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

06929\06929_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06929\06929_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06929\06929_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 06929\06929_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06929\06929_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06929\06929_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06929\06929_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06929\06929_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06929\06929_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06929\06929_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06929\06929_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06929\Supporting Documents\06929_A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06929\Supporting Documents\06929_A5-3 wb-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06929\Supporting Documents\06929_D3-1 pond-1 D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06929\Supporting Documents\06929_Submittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the Fund) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report), I, LSheryl D. Hudson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                           
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ LSheryl D. Hudson                    
|                       |  |  |  | LSheryl D. Hudson Chief Financial Officer
##### 



(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Partnership.
  By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Cronos Capital Corp.,General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of CronosCapital Corp., General Partner of the Partnership
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2355

CHONG SU YI,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CABLE NEWS NETWORK,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District 

Judge. (8:14-cv-03671-DKC)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chong Su Yi appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. 

Cable News Network, No. 8:14-cv-03671-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 25, 

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998             JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998             APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,772                   4,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0                     100
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,840                  31,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,907                   1,413
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,199                  16,231
<PP&E>                                         124,573                 111,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,263                  28,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,093                 167,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,523                  20,446
<BONDS>                                         44,907                  60,487
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           422                     420
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,808                  82,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,093                 167,328
<SALES>                                        129,459                 113,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,459                 113,287
<CGS>                                           38,671                  36,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,108                  73,756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (111)                  1,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,061                   3,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,401                  34,701
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,341                  13,754
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,060                  20,947
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                   1,959
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,060                  18,988
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.56                    1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.49                    1.11
        

</TABLE>
FY 2021

Grain Insp. &

Weigh. 2

Grain 

I&W 

Grain Official 

Agencies Supv

Grain 

OA Rice Comm

5 Year Rolling Average (FY16-20) 121,004,714 

Actual Metric Tons FY 2021 136,574,792 232,738,700 

Salary and Benefits $ 30,522,358 0.223 $ 1,282,811 0.006 $4,436,843 

Travel $ 621,075 0.005 $ 13,798 0.000 $73,241 

Shipping and Moving Expenses $ 73,249 0.001 $ 10,659 0.000 $4,364 

Rent and Utilities $ 1,179,252 0.009 $ 12,393 0.000 $212,086 

Printing $ 51,430 0.000 $ 4,023 0.000 $8,169 

Other Services1 $ 4,634,625 0.034 $ 42,842 0.000 $553,305 

Supplies and Materials $ 615,856 0.005 $ 2,597 0.000 $20,424 

Equipment $ 20,752 0.000 $ - - $14,015 

Grants, Subsidies, and Contributions $ - 0.000 $ - - $0 

Insurance Claims $ 94,363 0.001 $ - - $0 

Interest Paid $ 1,971 0.000 $ - - $20 

TOTAL $ 37,814,930 $ 0.277 $ 1,369,123 $ 0.006 $ 5,322,468 $ 

1Other Services includes AMS overhead costs, Agency and Mission Area-level administrative support costs (e.g., Information Technology, Human Resource Support), as well as costs for FGIS contracts and training. 2FY21 $5.07 million of obligations reimbursed with CARES Act funding.

Dated: 11/22/2021

User Fee Obligations by Program for FY21
January 21, 1999

20869, 21171

#### State v. Fo

Affirmed
Order entered November 21, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 22 - 00844 - CR No. 05 - 22 - 008 5 0 - CR No. 05 - 22 - 00851 - CR No. 05 - 22 - 00877 - CR ENRIQUE GERARDO ESQUIVEL - MESEN , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal f rom the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 199 - 83448 - 2021 , 199 - 83449 - 2021, 199 - 83450 - 2021 & 199 - 83451 - 2021 O RDER Before the Court is th e November 17, 2022 sec ond request of court reporter Robyn M. Rodriguez for an ex tension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’s record filed by December 19, 2022

.– 2

– We caution Ms. Rodriguez that further requests to extend the time to f ile the reporter ’ s record will be disfavored. /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             884
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      435
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,258
<PP&E>                                          57,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              780
<BONDS>                                         35,071
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,759
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,533
<SALES>                                         12,854
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,227
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   715
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,071
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    934
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                934
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       934
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60


</TABLE>
DARYL L. MOORE‡

DARYL L. MOORE, P.C.

1005 Heights Boulevard

Houston, Texas 77008

713.529.0048 Telephone

713.529.2498 Facsimile

February 5, 2015

Via Electronic eFiling

Mr. Christopher A. Prine, Clerk

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

301 Fannin, Room 245

Houston, Texas 77002

RE: Cause No. 14-14-00811-CV; In the Matter of the Marriage of

April A. Dishaw and Donald J. Dishaw; In the Fourteenth Court

of Appeals, Houston, Texas

Dear Mr. Prine:

I am writing this letter to inform the Court that, per the Court’s order,

the parties mediated this dispute with me on January 15, 2015. The parties

were unable to reach a settlement agreement during the mediation.

Thank you for your customary courtesy.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Daryl L. Moore 

Daryl L. Moore, 

Attorney/Certified Mediator

‡BOARD CERTIFIED, CIVIL APPELLATE LAW, TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION

ACCEPTED

14-14-00811-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

2/5/2015 3:32:27 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/5/2015 3:32:27 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk ------------------------ VOID RW ------------------------ FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/5/2015 3:32:27 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
February 5, 2015

Mr. Prine, Clerk

Page 2

 

cc:

Ms. Lynn Kuriger Stanton

JENKINS & KAMIN, L.L.P.

Two Greenway Plaza, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77046

Mr. Warren Cole

LAW OFFICE OF WARREN COLE

3355 West Alabama, Suite 825

Houston, Texas 77098

Mr. Alan Daughtry

LAW OFFICE OF ALAN DAUGHTRY

675 Shartle Circle

Houston, Texas 77024

‡BOARD CERTIFIED, CIVIL APPELLATE LAW, TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION
EX-10.19





 Exhibit 10.19 

 
 



 
 Tile, Inc. 

1900 S. Norfolk St. Ste. 310 
 San
Mateo CA 94403 
 www.tile.com 

June 2, 2022 
 Jabil, Inc. 

10560 Dr. M.L. King Jr. Street North 
 St. Petersburg,
Florida 22716 
 Attn: Irvin Stein, Vice President 
 CC: Stephy
Zheng, Business Unit Director 

			
	Only via Email to:	 	irvin_stein@jabil.com
		 	stephy_zheng@jabil.com

 Re: Manufacturing Services Agreement Extension 

Dear Irv, 
 This letter is in reference to the Manufacturing
Services Agreement, entered into between Tile, Inc. (“Tile”) and Jabil Inc. (formerly known as Jabil Circuit, Inc.) and Jabil Circuit (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“Jabil Singapore”) (Jabil Inc. and Jabil Singapore
hereinafter collectively referred to as “Jabil”), with an Effective Date of March 8, 2017 (“Agreement”). While the Agreement has an expiration date of March 8, 2022, Tile and Jabil confirmed via e-mail that the Agreement would remain effective and continue under its current terms and conditions while we work together on a formal amendment to the Agreement. 

This letter, when signed by both Tile and Jabil below, will serve to reflect each party’s agreement to continue to work together towards finalizing and
executing a formal amendment to the Agreement and to extend the Agreement’s effectiveness beyond its termination date until a formal amendment can be executed between Tile and Jabil. 

Please sign below where indicated for Jabil to reflect Jabil’s agreement and return a copy to Tile at pleitner@life360.com. If you have any
questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at pleitner@life360.com. 
 Sincerely, 

/s/ Kristin Markworth 
 Kristin Markworth 

Chief Operating Officer 
  

 
 © 2022 Tile, Inc. –
Company Confidential 
  Page
 1
 of 2 












 Acknowledged and Agreed: 
  

									
	Jabil Inc.	 		 	Jabil Circuit (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
					
	By:	 	/s/ Irvin Stein	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Irvin Stein
					
	Name:	 	Irvin Stein	 		 	Name:	 	Irvin Stein
					
	Title:	 	Vice President	 		 	Title:	 	Vice President
					
	Date:	 	6/9/2022	 		 	Date:	 	6/9/2022

  
  

 
 © 2022 Tile, Inc. –
Company Confidential 
  Page
 2
 of 2