alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 24.1****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     WHEREAS, AMEREN CORPORATION, a Missouri corporation (herein referred to as the “Company”), isrequired to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, its annual report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2007; and     WHEREAS, each of the below undersigned is a director of the Company.     NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Gary L. Rainwaterand/or Warner L. Baxter and/or Thomas R. Voss and/or Steven R. Sullivan and/or Martin J. Lyonsand/or Jerre E. Birdsong the true and lawful attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned, for and in thename, place and stead of the undersigned, to affix the name of the undersigned to said Form 10-Kand any amendments thereto, and, for the performance of the same acts, each with power to appointin their place and stead and as their substitute, one or more attorneys-in-fact for theundersigned, with full power of revocation; hereby ratifying and confirming all that saidattorneys-in-fact may do by virtue hereof.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 8th day of February2008:       Stephen F. Brauer, Director /s/ Stephen F. Brauer      Susan S. Elliott, Director /s/ Susan S. Elliott      Walter J. Galvin, Director /s/ Walter J. Galvin      Gayle P. W. Jackson, Director /s/ Gayle P. W. Jackson      James C. Johnson, Director /s/ James C. Johnson      Richard A. Liddy, Director /s/ Richard A. Liddy      Gordon R. Lohman, Director /s/ G. R. Lohman      Charles W. Mueller, Director /s/ C. W. Mueller      Douglas R. Oberhelman, Director /s/ Douglas R. Oberhelman      Harvey Saligman, Director /s/ Harvey Saligman      Patrick T. Stokes, Director /s/ Patrick T. Stokes      Jack D. Woodard, Director /s/ Jack D. Woodard          STATE OF MISSOURI  )      )  SS.CITY OF ST. LOUIS  )        On this 8th day of February, 2008, before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for saidState, personally appeared the above-named directors of Ameren Corporation, known to me to be thepersons described in and who executed the foregoing power of attorney and acknowledged to me thatthey executed the same as their free act and deed for the purposes therein stated.     IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal.                /s/ Donna S. Bilkey   DONNA S. BILKEY   Notary Public- Notary SealSTATE OF MISSOURI- JEFFERSON COUNTYCommission #06900096My Commission Expires 06/13/2010
# Montana_county_differentials_20
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

January 6, 2016

Hon. Ricardo P. Rodriguez

Hidalgo County District Attorney

100 N. Closner

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Mr. David Servin

TDCJ #02010435

Jester IV Unit

4 Jester Road

Richmond, TX 77406 Hon. Alfredo Morales Jr.

Attorney at Law

P. O. Box 52942

McAllen, TX 78505

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 15

- 00369

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. CR

- 1977

- 13

- D

Style: David Servin v. The State of Texas

Appellant’s brief in the above cause was received and filed in this Court on

M onday, December 28, 2015.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
Abel Acosta 

Abel Medrano #1743611 

Dalhart Unit TDCJ 

11950 FM 998 

Dalhart, Texas 79022 

April 13, 2015 

Clerk of Criminal Appeals 

P.O. Box 12308 

Austin, Texas ,78711-2308 

RE: WR-82,939-01 

Sub: Letter of Advisory 

Dear Clerk: 

Enclosed please find Applicant's Letter of Advi~ory to be filed 

in above number cause. Please file date stamp and bring to the 

attention of the Court. Please file date stamp the enclosed 

copy of this letterhead and return in the provided self addressed 

stamped envelope. 

Thank you for your assistance on this matter. 

Sincerely, ___ . __ _... . .--• -·- . 

RECE~VED IN 

COURT Of CRIMINAl APPEALS 

Abel Medrano APR 20 2015 

Abel Acosta, Clerk 

AB/ 

cc: FILE 

Copy to district Attorny 

Enclosure: Self addressed stamped envelope 
Abel Acosta 

Abel Medrano #1743611 

Dalhart Unit TDCJ 

11950 FM 998 

Dalhart, Texas 79022 

April 13, 2015 

Clerk of Criminal Appeals 

P.O. Box 12308 

Austin, .Texas 78711-2308 

RE: WR-82,939-01 

Sub: Letter of Advisory 

Dear Clerk: 

Enclosed please find Applicant's Letter of Advisory to be filed 

in above number cause. Please file date stamp and bring to the 

attentlon of the Court. Please file date stamp the enclosed 

copy of this letterhead and return in the provided self addressed 

stamped envelope. 

Thank you for your assistance on this matter. 

Sincerely~ 

Abe:l Mearano 

AB/ 

cc: FILE 

Copy to district Attorny 

·Enclosure: Self addressed stamped envelope 
CAUSE NO. WR-81939-01 

. ' 

IN THE 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

EX PARTE 

ABEL MEDRANO 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 

§ 

§ 

§ 

ORIGINATING IN THE 27th 

DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR 

Lampasas County, Texas 

LETTER OF ADVISORY 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: 

COMES NOW, Abel Medrano, .TDCJ-ID #1743611, Applicant prose 

in the above captioned cause and files this Letter of Advisory to 

inform this Court that on April 10, 2015, Applicant. received the 

district clerk's letter stating that a copy of the State's Answer 

to Applicant's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, §11.07, was 

purportedly sent on February 27, 2015. To date, Applicant hasn't 

received said copy. Applicant contends that the ~DCJ Mail room 

logs will not reflect that any legal materials was received by the 

mail room staff of the Dalhart Unit around that time frame. Only 

by Court order will the necessary records be released proving Applicant's assertion that he has never received or had an opportunity and afforded due process to refute the State's contentions 

in its Answer .. Applicant requests this Court order the records be 

released. This Letter of Advisory and request within, is not made 

for the purpose of delay but, so that justice is served. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 

Abel Medrano 

- page l of l -
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Brian E. Dearing, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;Dated:June 19, 2007         By:
##### 



Exhibit 31.12
  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
    CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS LIGHT
    COMPANY
    (required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
    Form 10-K
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e))
  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared; b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and    a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 1,
    2007
#### State v. Hendrickson

24921

08/21/2003

Affirmed
# C_2016202EN.01007501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/75

---

Article 75

(ex Article 60 TEC)

(ex Article 60 TEC)

Where necessary to achieve the objectives set out in Article 67, as regards preventing and combating terrorism and related activities, the European Parliament and the Council, acting by means of regulations in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall define a framework for administrative measures with regard to capital movements and payments, such as the freezing of funds, financial assets or economic gains belonging to, or owned or held by, natural or legal persons, groups or non-State entities.

The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt measures to implement the framework referred to in the first paragraph.

The acts referred to in this Article shall include necessary provisions on legal safeguards.

---
EXHIBIT 12
 DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(In thousands, except for ratio data)
 Fiscal Years EndedJanuary 1,
    
    
    January 2,
    
    
    January 3,
    
    
    December 29,
    
    
    December 30,2011
    
    
    2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes and equity earnings
    
    $
    (27,722
    )
    
    $
    97,670
    
    
    $
    92,522
    
    
    $
    (36,194
    )
    
    $
    (16,421
    )Distributed income of equity method investees
    
    
    1,255
    
    
    
    180
    
    
    
    271
    
    
    
    439
    
    
    
    1,478Fixed charges from continuing operations
    
    
    225,962
    
    
    
    272,259
    
    
    
    242,064
    
    
    
    250,758
    
    
    
    225,162Earnings available for fixed charges
    
    $
    199,495
    
    
    $
    370,109
    
    
    $
    334,857
    
    
    $
    215,003
    
    
    $
    210,219Fixed charges from continuing operations:Interest expense
    
    $
    150,906
    
    
    $
    196,789
    
    
    $
    169,799
    
    
    $
    190,129
    
    
    $
    169,719Amortization of debt expense and discounts
    
    
    13,044
    
    
    
    8,926
    
    
    
    4,686
    
    
    
    4,722
    
    
    
    4,996Assumed interest element included in rent expense
    
    
    62,012
    
    
    
    66,544
    
    
    
    67,579
    
    
    
    55,907
    
    
    
    50,447Total fixed charges from continuing operations
    
    $
    225,962
    
    
    $
    272,259
    
    
    $
    242,064
    
    
    $
    250,758
    
    
    $
    225,162Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (A)
    
    
    0.88
    X
    
    
    1.36
    X
    
    
    1.38
    X
    
    
    0.86
    X
    
    
    0.93
    X
 
 (A)
    
    Due to Doles loss from continuing operations in 2010, 2007 and 2006,
the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was less than 1:1. Dole would have
needed to generate additional earnings of $26.5 million, $35.8 million and
$14.9 million to achieve a coverage ratio of 1:1 for 2010, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Elizabeth J. Sibley, as independent * From the 385th District Court

administrator of the Estate of Jane of Midland County,

Dunn Sibley, et al., Trial Court No. CV57310.

Vs. No. 11-21-00133-CV * December 17, 2021

Robert Bechtel; W. Burgess Wade; * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Sara Bullock McIntosh; Dan Bullock; (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

and Denna McGuire and Robert McGuire, Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

as independent co-executors of the Estate

of Allen McGuire,

This court has considered the joint motion for partial dismissal filed in this 

appeal by Appellants and Appellees Denna McGuire and Robert McGuire, as 

independent co-executors of the Estate of Allen McGuire, and concludes that the 

motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

appeal is dismissed in part—insofar as it relates to the McGuire Appellees. 

Appellants’ appeal remains active with respect to the remaining Appellees.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Judy Hart (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 16, 2021 - 8:26amThank you to you all. It was so encouraging and inspiring and reassuring and comforting to see the House chamber cleaned up and ready for the certification business. It restored my fatith in my government being able to carry on despite the awful effort to stop it. Congratulations to you all. Judy Hart
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Charles Ronald Wade v. Harris County

Appellate case number: 01-15-00155-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-69056

Trial court: 295th District Court of Harris County

The Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by appellant on April 13, 2015 is 

DENIED, without prejudice to refiling. Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the 

affidavit of indigence filed in the trial court pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 is 

insufficient. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c)(1); TEX. R. CIV. P. 145.

A new and separate affidavit and proof of current indigence compliant with Texas Rule 

of Appellate Procedure 20.1(b) must be filed, and appellant may not simply refile an earlier 

affidavit filed in the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(b), (c)(1).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Harvey Brown

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 21, 2015
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Women's Suffrage Parade, 1917
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

For decades after America won its independence from Great Britain, many of its people still lacked basic rights. The drive for woman suffrage was formalized at the 1848 women's rights convention in Seneca Falls, New York, but not until 1920 (with the ratification of the nineteenth amendment to the Constitution) did women have the right to vote. This mural depicts a 1917 suffrage parade in New York. Anna Howard Shaw, in cap and gown, leads the parade in New York, and at the right is Carrie Chapman Catt, president of the National American Woman Suffrage Association.

**Left:** Jeanette Rankin of Montana, the first woman elected to the House of Representatives, is depicted.

**Right:** Joseph H. Rainey of South Carolina, the first African American elected to the House of Representatives, is shown.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The central east-west corridor is referred to as the Great Experiment Hall because it chronicles in 16 murals the legislative milestones of three centuries, from the signing of the Mayflower Compact in 1629 to the enactment of women's suffrage in 1920. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### PATRICK STANLEY *v.*BRENDA STANLEY

(AC 19986)

Landau, Schaller and Hennessy, Js.

*328Submitted on briefs March 22

officially released June 20, 2000

*John Demetre*filed a brief for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Opinion*

LANDAU, J.

The plaintiff, Patrick Stanley, appeals from the judgment of the trial court modifying the award of child support. The sole question on appeal is whether the trial court improperly failed to calculate the support order to determine the presumptive support amount pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-215a. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On July 19, 1999, the court granted the plaintiffs motion to modify the amount of child support that he was required to pay to the defendant and ordered a temporary modification. In response to the plaintiffs motion for reconsideration, the court, on August 18, 1999, ordered a farther modification. The record contains neither a written memorandum of decision nor a transcribed copy of an oral decision signed by the court, regarding the plaintiffs motion for reconsideration. See *329Practice Book § 64-1. “The duty to provide this court with a record adequate for review rests with the appellant. See Practice Book § 4007 [now § 61-10] . . . .” (Citations omitted.) *Chase Manhattan Bank/City Trust*v. *AECO Elevator Co.,*48 Conn. App. 605, 607, 710 A.2d 190 (1998). We have frequently declined to review claims where the appellant has failed to provide the court with an adequate record for review. See id., 609; *Emigrant Savings Bank*v. *Erickson,*46 Conn. App. 51, 53-54, 696 A.2d 1057, cert. denied, 243 Conn. 921, 701 A.2d 341 (1997). We have, on occasion, reviewed claims of impropriety in the absence of a written memorandum of decision or a signed transcript of an oral decision as long as the transcript contains a sufficiently detailed and concise statement of the court’s findings. See *Mikolinski*v. *Commissioner of Motor Vehicles,*55 Conn. App. 691, 699, 740 A.2d 885 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 922, 747 A.2d 518 (2000); *Connecticut National Bank*v. *Browder,*30 Conn. App. 776, 778-79, 622 A.2d 588 (1993); *Banthin*v. *Shoreline Plumbing & Heating Supply Corp.,*30 Conn. App. 637, 640, 621 A.2d 769 (1993); cf. *Centerbank*v. *Gross,*31 Conn. App. 38, 39-40, 622 A.2d 1066 (1993) (no review because unsigned transcript did not reveal basis of court’s factual conclusions).

Here, the unsigned transcript fails to provide this court with the necessary foundation to determine the propriety of the court’s conclusions without resorting to conjecture and speculation. *Alix*v. *Leech,*45 Conn. App. 1, 5, 692 A.2d 1309 (1997).

The judgment is affirmed.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.