alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                               
               <ARTICLE>                                                       5
                      
               <S>                                                           <C>
               <PERIOD-TYPE>                                               6-MOS
               <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1998
               <PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-1998
               <CASH>                                                 12,444,856
               <SECURITIES>                                                    0
               <RECEIVABLES>                                          15,297,820
               <ALLOWANCES>                                            2,162,000
               <INVENTORY>                                             5,965,282
               <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       30,077,803
               <PP&E>                                                  2,717,474
               <DEPRECIATION>                                          1,254,432
               <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         49,907,419
               <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   6,947,969
               <BONDS>                                                         0
               <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
               <PREFERRED>                                                 4,000
               <COMMON>                                                   12,868
               <OTHER-SE>                                             40,576,119
               <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           49,907,419
               <SALES>                                                 8,826,002
               <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        9,192,999
               <CGS>                                                   2,889,621
               <TOTAL-COSTS>                                           3,050,748
               <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        9,463,292
               <LOSS-PROVISION>                                           30,535
               <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        720,541
               <INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (3,482,167)
               <INCOME-TAX>                                              232,213
               <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (3,714,380)
               <DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
               <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
               <CHANGES>                                                       0
               <NET-INCOME>                                          (3,714,380)
               <EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (0.64)
               <EPS-DILUTED>                                              (0.64)
                       
               
</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 954 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the individual 

mandate certain individuals who had coverage under a terminated qualified health plan funded through the Consumer Operated and Oriented 

Plan (CO–OP) program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

from the individual mandate certain individuals who had 

coverage under a terminated qualified health plan funded 

through the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO– 

OP) program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 954 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM INDIVIDUAL MANDATE FOR 

2 CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAD COVERAGE 

3 UNDER A TERMINATED QUALIFIED HEALTH 

4 PLAN FUNDED THROUGH THE CONSUMER 

5 OPERATED AND ORIENTED PLAN (CO–OP) 

6 PROGRAM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5000A(e) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(6) CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS PREVIOUSLY EN11 ROLLED IN QUALIFIED HEALTH PLANS FUNDED

12 THROUGH THE CONSUMER OPERATED AND ORI13 ENTED PLAN (CO–OP) PROGRAM.—In the case of an 

14 applicable individual who was enrolled in a qualified 

15 health plan offered by a qualified nonprofit health 

16 insurance issuer (as defined in subsection (c) of sec17 tion 1322 of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

18 Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18042)) receiving funds 

19 through the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan 

20 program established under such section for such 

21 plan and such issuer terminated or otherwise discon22 tinued providing the plan in the area in which the 

23 individual resides during a month during a calendar 

24 year, the applicable individual for— 

25 ‘‘(A) such month and each subsequent 

26 month during such calendar year, or 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 954 IH

1 ‘‘(B) in the case the date of such dis2 continuance occurs during a month in the last 

3 quarter of a calendar year, such month and 

4 each subsequent month during such calendar 

5 year and the subsequent calendar year.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to October 2014 

8 and subsequent months. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Vision Services Group LLC 6185 Crooked Creek Rd. Suite B ! Norcross , GA 30092 ! Phone: (800) 874 - 9441 ! E - Mail: mmendez@vsg - unmanned.com ! Web: www.vsg - unmanned.com 8 December 2014 U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations Federal Aviation Administration West Building Ground Floor, Room w12 - 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington DC 20590 Subject: Petition for exemption of applicable requirements of the Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) for VSG - Unmanned’s small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) Publishable Summary: Vision Services Group, LLC (VSG - Unmanned) wishes to petition for exemption from specific regulations of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. These exemptions are pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. PL 112 - 95, February 14, 2012, 126 Stat 11 . VSG - Unmanned’s highest consideration, with regards to the commercialization of unmanned systems , is the safety and integrity of the United States National Airspace System. To ensure the continual adherence to this objective and in observance of § 91.7, an Aviation Safety, Safety Management System (AVSSMS) is followed and continually reviewed for nec essary amendments. On behalf of those employed by and invested in Vision Services Group, LLC, I thank you for your consideration of this petition for exemption and look forward to your comments and feedback so that we may continue to work towards our commo n objective.
#### GARY E. TALLMAN *v.*ADY SAI-KUEN TONG ET AL.

(AC 19737)

Schaller, Hennessy and Mihalakos, Js.

Submitted on briefs May 11

officially released June 6, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting a new sale date.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, LTD.,

Appellant

v.

CCP SYSTEMS AG,

Cross-Appellant

______________________ 

2014-1401, 2014-1402

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 

95/001,398.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DAVID L. MCCOMBS, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Richardson, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by DEBRA 

JANECE MCCOMAS, Dallas, TX.

BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 

Washington, DC, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by MEHRAN ARJOMAND, Los Angeles, CA.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN and LOURIE, Circuit Judges). *

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court

* Circuit Judge Kathleen M. O’Malley has recused, 

and did not participate in the decision.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00313-CV

Propel Financial Services, LLC

v.

Conquer Land Utilities, LLC

On Appeal from the

206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-4914-17-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court 

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs 

of the appeal are adjudged against appellee, Conquer Land Utilities, LLC. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 18, 2019
# EUR-Lex - 22002X1126(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22002X1126(01)

**Information on the entry into force of the Interbus Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus **

*
Official Journal L 321 , 26/11/2002 P. 0044 - 0044 *

Information on the entry into force of the Interbus Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus

The Interbus Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus will enter into force on 1 January 2003, the procedures provided for in Article 19 of the Agreement having been completed on 3 October 2002.

The entry into force as per 1 January 2003 will apply to all contracting parties which have so far ratified the Agreement, in accordance with the provisions of its Article 28. These contracting parties are: the Czech Republic, the European Community, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Romania and Slovenia.
...h\ l5.ao\5

tW^H^fou fee saute Vvm££ Pai-i^cc..

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 17 2015

AbelAeosia, Clerk
EXHIBIT  99.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFG Investment Trust B (the "Trust"),
on  Form  10-Q  for  the  period  ended  September  30,  2002  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  the  Principal  Financial  and  Accounting  Officer of the Trust's
Managing  Trustee,  hereby  certifies  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350 as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:
(1)     the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and
(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of the Trust.

                    /s/  Richard  K  Brock
                    ----------------------
                    Richard  K  Brock
Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Treasurer  of  AFG  ASIT  Corp.,
the  Managing  Trustee  of  the  Trust
(Principal  Financial  and  Accounting  Officer)
November  14,  2002
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00360

- CR

Daniel Rossi

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 2

o f Tarrant County (1441426 )

April 27, 2017

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s order . It is ordered that the trial court ’s

order is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
20642

#### Hu v. American Intern. Adjustment Co.

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply563Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Holly (not verified) (not verified)PermalinkMay 17, 2017 - 8:04amThank you for taking the time to do this!  I've seen similar ones (but not quite as nice) in some parks in London.  It is refreshing to see some compassion at work.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Billy Dean Caldwell, Appellant

No. 06-15-00008-CV v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. Nos. 22015 and 

22349). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Billy Dean Caldwell, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 16, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Brian E. Dearing, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of ARI Network Services, Inc.,certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated: March 19, 2007   /s/ Brian E. Dearing    Brian E. Dearing  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
10215

#### State v. Dumlao

Dismissed
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2144
JOSEPH R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED; FIRST NORTH AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 00-2145
JOSEPH R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CIRCUIT CITY STORES; CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED; FIRST NORTH AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK, Defendants - Appellees.2 No. 00-2146
JOSEPH R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED; FIRST NORTH AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-98-1407-A, CA-99-695-A, CA-99-696-A) Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 23, 2001 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph R. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Earle Duncan Getchell, Jr., MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Joseph R. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders denyinghis Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motions and his motion to vacate the judgment and remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., Nos. CA-98- 1407-A; CA-99-695-A; CA-99-696-A (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 1, 2000, entered Aug. 7, 2000; filed Aug. 3, 2000, entered Aug. 7, 2000; filed Aug. 15, 2000, entered Aug. 19, 2000). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                              24/7 Real Media, Inc.
                          2002 Equity Compensation Plan

                                Dated April 22, 2002


         The purpose of this 24/7 Real Media, Inc. 2002 Equity Compensation Plan
(the "Plan") is to enable 24/7 Real Media, Inc. (the "Company") to offer and
issue to certain employees, former employees, advisors and consultants of the
Company and its affiliates common stock of the Company in payment of amounts
owed by the Company to such third parties.

         1. The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued
pursuant to the Plan shall not exceed 3,000,000 shares.

         2. The Company may from time to time issue to employees, former
employees, advisors and consultants to the Company or its affiliates shares of
common stock of the Company in payment or exchange for or in settlement or
compromise of amounts due by the Company to such persons for goods sold and
delivered or to be delivered or services rendered or to be rendered.

         3. Shares of common stock issued pursuant to the Plan shall be issued
at a price per share of not less than eighty-five percent (85%) of the fair
market value per share on the date of issuance and on such other terms and
conditions as determined by the Company.

         4. The Chief Executive Officer of the Company shall be authorized to
issue shares pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of the Plan,
provided that all issuances shall be co-authorized by at least one of the
President, any Executive Vice President, the Chief Financial Officer or the
General Counsel.

         5. This Plan may be amended at any time by the Company.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,1999 OF CARROLS CORPORATION
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,901,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  787,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (53,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,211,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,514,000
<PP&E>                                     214,412,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (91,599,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             320,027,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       39,210,000
<BONDS>                                    249,118,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,051,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               320,027,000
<SALES>                                    455,440,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           456,479,000
<CGS>                                      137,279,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              384,395,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          22,386,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,978,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,826,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,152,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,099,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,053,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>