alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01013801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/138 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/138

---

Article 200

(ex Article 184 TEC)

(ex Article 184 TEC)

1.   Customs duties on imports into the Member States of goods originating in the countries and territories shall be prohibited in conformity with the prohibition of customs duties between Member States in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties.

2.   Customs duties on imports into each country or territory from Member States or from the other countries or territories shall be prohibited in accordance with the provisions of Article 30.

3.   The countries and territories may, however, levy customs duties which meet the needs of their development and industrialisation or produce revenue for their budgets.

The duties referred to in the preceding subparagraph may not exceed the level of those imposed on imports of products from the Member State with which each country or territory has special relations.

4.   Paragraph 2 shall not apply to countries and territories which, by reason of the particular international obligations by which they are bound, already apply a non-discriminatory customs tariff.

5.   The introduction of or any change in customs duties imposed on goods imported into the countries and territories shall not, either in law or in fact, give rise to any direct or indirect discrimination between imports from the various Member States.

---
Order entered February 7, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01114-CV

PAULA WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

FIDEL MORENO, SR. AND FIDEL MORENO, JR., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-06413-A

ORDER

Before the Court is appellees’ February 3, 2017 second motion for extension of time to 

file appellees’ brief. We GRANT appellees’ motion.

We ORDER appellees to file the brief on or before February 10, 2017. We caution 

appellees that further requests for an extension of time will be disfavored.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                               JO-ANN STORES, INC.

                  LIST OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO ARE PARTIES TO
          THE SPLIT DOLLAR LIFE INSURANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE REGISTRANT


-        Alan Rosskamm
-        David Bolen
-        Brian Carney
-        Rosalind Thompson
-        Mike Edwards
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Kenneth I. Denos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2007 |  | /s/ KENNETH I. DENOS   
|                       |  | Kenneth I. Denos       
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 6, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-11347

Summary Calendar

 

LANCE GERHARD EDWARDS,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR, 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

 RespondentAppellee.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CV-2673-M

--------------------------------------------------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES AND STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

InMay1998, Lance Gerhard Edwards, now Texas prisoner #831407, was convicted byguilty

plea of burglary of a habitation with the intent to commit theft and sentenced to 30 years’

imprisonment. He appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application as

time-barred. The district court granted a certificate of appealability as to: (1) whether the initial filing
-2-

of Edwards’s state habeas corpus application constituted a “properly filed” application for purposes

of the statutory tolling provision under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2); and (2) whether Edwards was

entitled to equitable tolling. This court reviews de novo the district court’s denial of a § 2254

application based upon procedural grounds. Grillette v. Warden, WinnCorr. Ctr., 372 F.3d 765, 769

(5th Cir. 2004).

The initial filing of Edwards’s state habeas corpus application did not constitute a “properly

filed” application for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2) because the Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals determined that the application failed to comply with TEX. R. APP. P. 73.2. See Artuz v.

Bennett, 531 U.S. 4, 8 (2000); Larry v. Dretke, 361 F.3d 890, 895 (5th Cir. 2004). Moreover,

Edwards hasfailed to allege circumstances warranting equitable tolling fromthe time he initiallyfiled

his state habeas corpus application to the time that application was returned to him for

noncompliance. See Felder v. Johnson, 204 F.3d 168, 170-71 (5th Cir. 2000); Coleman v. Johnson,

184 F.3d 398, 402 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, because the district court properly dismissed

Edwards’s instant application as barred by limitations, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SEVEN

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 349

(ex Article 299(2), second, third and fourth subparagraphs, TEC)

(ex Article 299(2), second, third and fourth subparagraphs, TEC)

Taking account of the structural social and economic situation of Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique, Réunion, Saint-Barthélemy, Saint-Martin, the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands, which is compounded by their remoteness, insularity, small size, difficult topography and climate, economic dependence on a few products, the permanence and combination of which severely restrain their development, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, shall adopt specific measures aimed, in particular, at laying down the conditions of application of the Treaties to those regions, including common policies. Where the specific measures in question are adopted by the Council in accordance with a special legislative procedure, it shall also act on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament.

The measures referred to in the first paragraph concern in particular areas such as customs and trade policies, fiscal policy, free zones, agriculture and fisheries policies, conditions for supply of raw materials and essential consumer goods, State aids and conditions of access to structural funds and to horizontal Union programmes.

The Council shall adopt the measures referred to in the first paragraph taking into account the special characteristics and constraints of the outermost regions without undermining the integrity and the coherence of the Union legal order, including the internal market and common policies.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SEVEN

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 339

(ex Article 287 TEC)

(ex Article 287 TEC)

The members of the institutions of the Union, the members of committees, and the officials and other servants of the Union shall be required, even after their duties have ceased, not to disclose information of the kind covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, in particular information about undertakings, their business relations or their cost components.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000879313
<NAME> SYGNET WIRELESS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,051,050
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,906,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,503,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,742,290
<PP&E>                                      47,500,077
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             342,827,698
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,453,587
<BONDS>                                    300,000,000
<COMMON>                                        91,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,820,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               342,827,698
<SALES>                                     39,100,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,100,452
<CGS>                                        8,774,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,700,293
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          15,242,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,852,999)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,852,999)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,852,999)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.30

                             CANCELLATION AGREEMENT

                        CONDITIONAL RIGHT TO OPTION GRANT

In light of the termination of Michael Golden, I hereby agree to cancel on the
date hereof the conditional right pursuant to my Employment Agreement dated
January 5, 2001 to have granted to me on July 5, 2001 an option to acquire
500,000 common shares of vFinance.com, Inc. Such right was subject to certain
conditions which have not been met as of the date hereof.

Dated: April 2, 2001

                                       /s/ Timothy Mahoney
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Timothy Mahoney
[Letterhead of Singer, Lewak, Greenbaum & Goldstein, L.L.P.]







            Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants
            ___________________________________________________


We have issued our report dated December 8, 1995, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Certron
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 1995. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of Certron Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 33-77722, 2-82948 and
33-27930).




/s/ Singer, Lewak, Greenbaum & Goldstein
Singer, Lewak, Greenbaum & Goldstein, L.L.P.
Los Angeles, California
December 8, 1995
 













                               EXHIBIT 23.1
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply459Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Patrick Corbin... (not verified)PermalinkApril 27, 2018 - 8:11amVery interesting article.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE II

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

Article 23

1.   By way of derogation from Article 301, first paragraph, of the TFEU establishing the maximum number of members of the Economic and Social Committee, Article 7 of the Protocol on transitional provisions, annexed to the TEU, the TFEU and the EAEC Treaty, shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 7

Until the entry into force of the decision referred to in Article 301 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the allocation of members of the Economic and Social Committee shall be as follows:

| Belgium | 12 |
| --- | --- |
| Bulgaria | 12 |
| Czech Republic | 12 |
| Denmark | 9 |
| Germany | 24 |
| Estonia | 7 |
| Ireland | 9 |
| Greece | 12 |
| Spain | 21 |
| France | 24 |
| Croatia | 9 |
| Italy | 24 |
| Cyprus | 6 |
| Latvia | 7 |
| Lithuania | 9 |
| Luxembourg | 6 |
| Hungary | 12 |
| Malta | 5 |
| Netherlands | 12 |
| Austria | 12 |
| Poland | 21 |
| Portugal | 12 |
| Romania | 15 |
| Slovenia | 7 |
| Slovakia | 9 |
| Finland | 9 |
| Sweden | 12 |
| United Kingdom | 24’ |

Belgium

12

Bulgaria

12

Czech Republic

12

Denmark

9

Germany

24

Estonia

7

Ireland

9

Greece

12

Spain

21

France

24

Croatia

9

Italy

24

Cyprus

6

Latvia

7

Lithuania

9

Luxembourg

6

Hungary

12

Malta

5

Netherlands

12

Austria

12

Poland

21

Portugal

12

Romania

15

Slovenia

7

Slovakia

9

Finland

9

Sweden

12

United Kingdom

24’

2.   The number of members of the Economic and Social Committee shall be temporarily increased to 353 to take account of the accession of Croatia for the period running from the date of accession until the end of the term of office during which Croatia accedes to the Union or until the entry into force of the decision referred to in Article 301, second paragraph, of the TFEU, whichever comes first.

3.   If the decision referred to in Article 301, second paragraph, of the TFEU has already been adopted by the date of accession, by way of derogation from Article 301, first paragraph, of the TFEU establishing the maximum number of members of the Economic and Social Committee, Croatia shall be temporarily allocated an appropriate number of members until the end of the term of office during which it accedes to the Union.

---
EXHIBIT 10.03.6




                                                  4/30/02
                           SWANK, INC.
                         90 PARK AVENUE
                    NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10016

                                   Effective January 1, 2002

Mr. James E. Tulin
c/o Swank, Inc.
8800 North Gainey Center Drive
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258

Dear Mr. Tulin:

          Reference is made to the Agreement dated as of March 1,
1989  between Swank, Inc. (the "Corporation") and you, as amended
to  date  (as  so amended, the "Existing Employment  Agreement"),
concerning your employment by the Corporation.  This letter  will
serve  to  confirm our agreement that the term  of  the  Existing
Employment Agreement is hereby extended for an additional  period
commencing on January 1, 2002 and ending on December 31, 2004.

          Except  as  modified and amended by  this  letter,  the
Existing Employment Agreement shall remain and continue  in  full
force and effect on and after the date hereof.

          This   letter  may  be  executed  in  any   number   of
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original  and  all
of  which  taken  together  shall constitute  one  and  the  same
agreement.   This letter shall be governed by, and construed  and
enforced  in accordance with, the laws of the State of New  York,
without  regard  to principles of conflicts of  law  (other  than
Section 5-1401 of the New York General Obligations Law).

          If the foregoing correctly sets forth our understanding
and  agreement,  kindly  countersign this  letter  in  the  space
provided below.

                                   Very truly yours,

                                   SWANK, INC.


                                   By:	/s/ Jerold R. Kassner

                                   Name: Jerold R. Kassner
                                   Title: Chief Financial Officer
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


  /s/ James E. Tulin
 James E. Tulin
Exhibit 23(a)






The undersigned firm of Independent  Petroleum Engineers,  of Calgary,  Alberta,
Canada, knows that it is named as having prepared an evaluation of the interests
of Canada  Southern  Petroleum  Ltd.,  prepared for filings with the SEC on Form
10-K 1996,  dated March 12, 1997, and hereby gives its consent to the use of its
name and to the use of the said estimates.



                                            Paddock Lindstrom & Associates Ltd.



                                            /s/ L.K. Lindstrom
                                            L. K. Lindstrom, P. Eng.
                                            President
     
<PAGE>
Table 1

Competitive Counties’ Weighted Difference by Milkshed

May and December of 2008 through 2011

Milkshed Name Year Month Difference1

Central 2008 May $0.98

Central 2008 December $1.22

Central 2009 May $1.40

Central 2009 December $1.27

Central 2010 May $1.24

Central 2010 December $1.26

Central 2011 May $1.07

Central 2011 December $1.01

Mideast 2008 May $0.95

Mideast 2008 December $1.02

Mideast 2009 May $0.92

Mideast 2009 December $0.92

Mideast 2010 May $1.04

Mideast 2010 December $0.88

Mideast 2011 May $1.15

Mideast 2011 December $0.45

Northeast 2008 May $0.90

Northeast 2008 December $1.10

Northeast 2009 May $1.20

Northeast 2009 December $1.06

Northeast 2010 May $1.11

Northeast 2010 December $1.07

Northeast 2011 May $1.01

Northeast 2011 December $1.01

Southeast 2008 May $1.00

Southeast 2008 December $1.09

Southeast 2009 May $0.69

Southeast 2009 December $0.70

Southeast 2010 May $0.68

Southeast 2010 December $0.87

Southeast 2011 May $0.39

Southeast 2011 December $0.71

Southwest 2008 May ($0.56)

Southwest 2008 December ($0.72)

Southwest 2009 May R2

Southwest 2009 December ($0.14)

Southwest 2010 May $0.43

Southwest 2010 December $1.19

Southwest 2011 May $0.82

Southwest 2011 December ($0.43)

Upper Midwest 2008 May $0.89

Upper Midwest 2008 December $1.14

Upper Midwest 2009 May $1.16

Upper Midwest 2009 December $1.14

Upper Midwest 2010 May $1.10

Upper Midwest 2010 December $1.25

Upper Midwest 2011 May $1.09

Upper Midwest 2011 December $1.19

                                                            

1 The difference shown, per cwt., is the result of subtracting the individual minimum order price at test and location from the gross

pay price.  This difference is weighted by milk pooled in each county to arrive at an average for the milkshed. 2 R=Restricted.

Prepared by:

   Market Administrator’s Office

   Minneapolis, Minnesota

   November 2012