alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply616Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Ray Smith (not... (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 9, 2019 - 10:10amInteresting piece of history of the U.S. Capitol.  Thanks for the great research.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### MASSACHUSETTS BROADCASTING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (THE NORTHERN CORPORATION, licensee of Station WMEX, Boston, Massachusetts, Intervener).

No. 7252.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided October 23, 1939.

Ben S. Fisher, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Hampson Gary, William H. Bauer, Fanney Neyman, William J. Dempsey, and Andrew G. Haley, all of Washington, D. C., all of the Federal Communications Commission, for appellee.

Arthur W. Scharfeld, Philip G. Loucks, Joseph F. Zias, and J. P. Tumulty, all of Washington, D. C., for intervener.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and STEPHENS and MILLER, Associate Justices.

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to No. 7250, Yankee Network, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, recently decided by this court.1 It arose out of the same proceeding, and was argued and submitted on the same record. The only substantial difference between the present case and No. 7250 is that the assignment of reasons for appeal is even less adequate to show an appealable interest than in No. 7250. Consequently, our decision will be the same.

Appeal dismissed.

1

107 F.2d 212, decided August 14, 1939.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12415Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Maria M. Vismale  (not verified)PermalinkApril 23, 2023 - 5:33pmAbsolutely stunning! Orchids such a lovely flower! They’re clearly the essence of beauty! :)
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FIVE

PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS ACT

PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS ACT

TITLE I

ADAPTATIONS TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE INSTITUTIONS AND TO THE RULES AND RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COMMITTEES

ADAPTATIONS TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE INSTITUTIONS AND TO THE RULES AND RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COMMITTEES

Article 45

The institutions shall, in accordance with the respective procedures provided for in the original Treaties, make such adaptations to their Rules of Procedure as are rendered necessary by accession.

Adaptations to the rules of the Committees established by the original Treaties and to their Rules of Procedure which are rendered necessary by accession shall be made as soon as possible after accession.

---
11/09/201 0 11:5 6 202267507 5 OFFIC E O F RULEMAKING PAG E 2 2 

## DEPARTMENTO F CKHOPEMON S : m r-o v- R P ! • n Jame s Chandle r 1 8 Whit e Oa

k Driv e Wes t Grove , P A 19390-917 6 Octobe r 25,201 0 Administrato T J . Randolp h Babbitt Roo m101 0

Re : Support

thes e change s t o th e FAA' s Fligh t Time/Duty Tim e NPR M Dear Adroniistrato r

Babbitt : A s aU S cominercial pilo t revjewiji g th e FA A Notic e o f Propose dRulemakin g (NPRM ) o n Fligh t cre w membe r Duty an dRes t

Requirement s I a mplease dtha t th e majorit

y o f th e NPR M represent s an improvemen t t o curren t regulation s an dcover s al l commercia l operation s iath e spiri t o f "On e Leve l o f

Safety. " However , ther e ar e som e specifi c item s ^a t

nee dt o b e change di n orde r t o mitigat e Bitigu e fo r

th e professional pilot . 1 ) Th e flight

tim e limi t

shoul dno t

b e increase d25 % from& hour s t o I dhours . 2 ) Th e augmente d( 3 person ) fligjit tim e limi t

shoul dno t

b e increase d25 % from1 2 t o 1 5 hours . 3 ) Res t requirement s shoul db e 1 0 hour s domesti c an d1 4 hour s international . 9 hours , reducibl e t o 8 hour s i s no t ernoug h tim e t o achiev e restorativ e sleep , eat , an datten dt o persona l hygien e betwee n duty periods . 4 ) Domesti c augmentatio n shoul dno t b e allowed . A s aprofessiona l commercia l aviato r woridn g a t

hig h spee di n congeste dairspace , an ddiroug h arduou s weathe r conditions , I ca

n tel l yo u tha t

fatigu e mitigaticH

i i s paramoun t

t o improvin g th e safety o f th e travellin g public . Th e NTS B ha s hel dfetigue o n it s "Mos t Wante dList " for

thirty year s becaus e i t

i s aproble mtibiat

flight crew s deal wit h o n adail y basis . Thi s FA A NPR M wil l g o alon g wa y t o reducin g fiitigue an dincreasin g safet y i f thes e item s arc addressed .

Jame s Chandle r 61 0 869-594 4
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 25, 2019

No. 04-19-00728-CV

Gary DANIELS,

Appellant

v.

Alissa DANIELS,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-20628

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Emergency Stay is hereby DENIED.

________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of October, 2019.

___________________________________

LUZ ESTRADA,

Chief Deputy Clerk
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 22

- 00230

- CR
IN RE Jose Angel VACA, ET AL. Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 27, 2022
PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURI SDICTION On April 19, 2022, R elators filed a petition for a writ of prohibition. After considering the petition, the record , and the letter from the office of the Kinney County Attorney, this court concludes it is without jurisdiction over this petition. T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.221(a) ; Tex. Emp ’rs’ Ins. Ass’n v. Kirby , 152 S.W.2d 1073 ( Tex. 1941). Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is dismissed

. See In re De Los Santos , No. 14

- 16

- 00749

- CV, 2016 WL 5342805, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 22, 2016, orig

. proceeding ) (mem . op.) ; S ee also In re

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 103 4 7 CR , styled The State of Texas VS. Manuel Antonio Ramirez Reyes ; Cause No. 10354CR styled The State of Texas VS. Jose Angel Vaca ; Cause No. 10356CR styled The State of Texas VS. Jesus Alfredo Solis Carrizales ; Cause No. 10361CR styled The State of Texas VS. Jose Alfredo Crisofer Aguirre De Leon ; Cause No. 10362CR styled The State of Texas VS. Roberto De Jesus Diaz Gonzales ; Cause No. 10363CR styled The State of Texas VS. Isacc De Dios Diaz ; Cause No. 10364CR styled The State of Texas VS. Jorge Favian Dominguez Ortiz ; Cause No. 10365CR styled The State of Texas VS. Pedro De La Cruz Montejo ; Caus e No. 10366CR styled The State of Texas VS. Luis Miguel Ramirez Perez ; and Cause No. 10367CR styled The State of Texas VS. Gabriel Colorado Carrillo , pending in the County Court , Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Tully Shahan presiding.04

- 22

- 00230

- CR

- 2

- Drake , No. 05

- 21

- 00570

- CV, 2021 WL 3073311, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas July 20, 2021, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).
PER C URIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Plant Variety Protection - 25 Certificates Issued on April 8, 2022

APPLICATION 

NUMBER

VARIETY NAME CROP APPLICANT / OWNER *CERTIFIED 

SEED ONLY?

201900176 ND Pegasus FIELD BEAN NDSU Research Foundation Yes

201900187 Bonnata KWS POTATO Stet Holland B.V. No

201900270 AAC Knight Rider FIELD BEAN Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada No

201900357 1073351 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900358 1073354 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900359 1073353 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900360 1073365 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900361 1073359 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900362 1073439 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900363 1072782 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900364 1073443 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900365 1073441 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900366 1073444 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900367 1073445 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900368 1073453 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900369 1073452 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900370 1073455 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900371 1073461 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900372 1073472 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900373 1073480 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900374 1073479 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900375 1072813 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900376 1072842 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900377 1077799 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900378 1072860 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

* Certified seed - seed which has been determined by an official seed certifying agency to conform to standards of genetic purity and identity as to variety,

which standards have been approved by the Secretary.

USDA, AMS, Science and Technology, Plant Variety Protection Office (202) 260-8983 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Rivera, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), rendered September 11, 1989, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree (two counts) and sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and the facts, by reversing the convictions for sodomy in the first degree, vacating the sentences imposed thereon, and dismissing those counts of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to establish that the defendant committed the crime of sodomy in the first degree by engaging in "deviate sexual intercourse” (Penal Law §§ 130.00 [2]; 130.50), that is, that the defendant’s penis touched the victim’s anus *(see, People v Stroman,*84 AD2d 851, 851-852). The medical testimony established that the victim’s injuries could have been caused by the insertion of a penis, a "blunt object”, or several fingers, into his rectum, but did not conclusively establish which method was actually performed. However, contrary to the defendant’s further contention, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish his guilt of sexual abuse in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt because the defendant’s actions, whether he inserted his penis, a "blunt object”, or several of his fingers into the victim’s rectum, constituted "sexual contact” within the meaning of Penal Law §§ 130.00 (3) and 130.65 *(see, People v Ditta,*52 NY2d 657, 660-661; *People v Watson,*171 AD2d 826).

Finally, we find that the court properly denied the defendant’s request for a missing witness charge as to the victim’s *582nine-year-old brother for two reasons. First, the defendant’s request, made after both sides rested, was untimely *(see, People v Gonzalez,*68 NY2d 424, 427-428; *People v Bradley,*160 AD2d 808; *People v Waldron,*154 AD2d 635). Second, the defendant failed, in any event, to sustain his burden of showing that the victim’s brother was knowledgeable about a material issue pending in the case and that his testimony would have been favorable to the defense *(see, People v Dianda,*70 NY2d 894, 896; *People v Gonzalez, supra,*at 427; *People v Watson, supra; People v Everette,*167 AD2d 350). Although it was apparent from the testimony of the victim’s grandmother and mother that his nine-year-old brother was home during the defendant’s commission of the act, there was absolutely no indication that the brother witnessed it *(see, People v Everette, supra; People v Lewis,*150 AD2d 499, 500-501). Balletta, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
December 31, 2007

27766

#### State v. O'Connor

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,341,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  888,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,230,641
<PP&E>                                      62,929,298
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,283,485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,876,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          462,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,413,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,876,454
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,780,862
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,893,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   941,694
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,331,629
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,152,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,484,536
<PP&E>                                      63,202,036
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,058,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,833,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          791,628
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,041,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,833,592
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,297,219
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,024,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,429,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          25,750
<SECURITIES>                                    36,359
<RECEIVABLES>                                  218,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (13,848)
<INVENTORY>                                     17,833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               314,745
<PP&E>                                         276,441
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (67,111)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 737,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,167
<BONDS>                                        384,905
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,371
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   737,938
<SALES>                                        745,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               745,653
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  642,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,971
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,809
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,162
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98
        

</TABLE>