alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-8003

___________ Richard Scott Rhinehart, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Extraordinary Writ v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, * * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: January 30, 2007 Filed: March 9, 2007

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, a member of the Iowa Bar a nd admitted to practice before this court, was appointed by the United St ates District Court under the Criminal Justice Act (CJA), 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, to represent oneJesse John Wendelsdorf. Following the completion of his duties of representati on, plaintiff filed a CJA voucher claiming payment for the services rendered.
Plaintiff states that the amount clai med was “summarily, arbitrarily, and unilaterally cut without notice, hearing, ju stification or explanation” by the Chief Judge of the Circuit, the Honorable James B. Loken. Plaintiff ha s filed what he has styled “Motion for Hearing on CJA Fees,” asking that the court schedule a hearing on-2- the motion, to be followed by a review pr ocess along with an independent decision by an unbiased arbitrator, following which plainti ff is to be restored to the legal fees to which he is entitled. We conclude that, for the reasons se t forth in United States v. Johnson , 391 F.3d 946 (8th Cir. 2004), we are without jurisdicti on to consider plaintiff’s motion. The chief judge’s role under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d)(3) is to ru le upon requests for waiver of the maximum amounts of compensation set forth in § 3006A(d)(2). As we held in Johnson , “The role of the chief judge therefore relates to the management of funds, and the decision to approve a recommendation for excess funds is entirely his responsibility, not that of an appellate panel.” 391 F.3d at 948. We conclude that the holding in Johnson applies with equal force to plaintiff’s motion. See also United States v. Obasi , 435 F.3d 847 (8th Cir. 2006). The motion is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

______________________________
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Robert Van Patten, Sr., Appellant, v Hans Walker, as Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed relator’s habeas corpus petition because the only issues raised in the petition either were or could have been raised on the direct appeal from the judgment of conviction or by way of a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 *(see, People ex*
      *1059
      *rel. Douglas v Vincent,*50 NY2d 901, 903, *affg for reasons stated*67 AD2d 587, 589; *People ex rel. Lamberty v Kuhlmann,*165 AD2d 922; *People ex rel. Grady v LeFevre,*152 AD2d 850, *lv denied*75 NY2d 702). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J.—Habeas Corpus.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12956Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Paulette Dixon-Ellis (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 29, 2024 - 12:02pmI am honored to be the Servicing HR Specialist for the Capitol Grounds and Arboretum.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2016202EN.01016801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/168 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/168

---

Article 283

(ex Article 112 TEC)

(ex Article 112 TEC)

1.   The Governing Council of the European Central Bank shall comprise the members of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank and the Governors of the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro.

2.   The Executive Board shall comprise the President, the Vice-President and four other members.

The President, the Vice-President and the other members of the Executive Board shall be appointed by the European Council, acting by a qualified majority, from among persons of recognised standing and professional experience in monetary or banking matters, on a recommendation from the Council, after it has consulted the European Parliament and the Governing Council of the European Central Bank.

Their term of office shall be eight years and shall not be renewable.

Only nationals of Member States may be members of the Executive Board.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 890 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 890

    To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                       Resources System Unit P16.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2015

    Mr. Clawson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                       Resources System Unit P16.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map included in the set of maps entitled 
``Coastal Barrier Resources System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the 
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to Unit 
P16 in Florida is hereby replaced by another map relating to the same 
unit entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
Corrected Unit P16'' and dated October 30, 2014.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 12012M043 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M043

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE V: GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION AND SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Chapter 2: Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy - Section 2: Provisions on the common security and defence policy - Article 43 **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0039 - 0039 *

Article 43

1. The tasks referred to in Article 42(1), in the course of which the Union may use civilian and military means, shall include joint disarmament operations, humanitarian and rescue tasks, military advice and assistance tasks, conflict prevention and peace-keeping tasks, tasks of combat forces in crisis management, including peace-making and post-conflict stabilisation. All these tasks may contribute to the fight against terrorism, including by supporting third countries in combating terrorism in their territories.

2. The Council shall adopt decisions relating to the tasks referred to in paragraph 1, defining their objectives and scope and the general conditions for their implementation. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, acting under the authority of the Council and in close and constant contact with the Political and Security Committee, shall ensure coordination of the civilian and military aspects of such tasks.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 24.5**POWER OF ATTORNEY**     WHEREAS, CILCORP Inc., an Illinois corporation (herein referred to as the “Company”), isrequired to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, its annual report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2006; and     WHEREAS, each of the below undersigned is a director of the Company.     NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Gary L. Rainwaterand/or Warner L. Baxter and/or Steven R. Sullivan and/or Martin J. Lyons and/or Jerre E. Birdsongthe true and lawful attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned, for and in the name, place and stead ofthe undersigned, to affix the name of the undersigned to said Form 10-K and any amendments thereto,and, for the performance of the same acts, each with power to appoint in their place and stead andas their substitute, one or more attorneys-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power ofrevocation; hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact may do by virtuehereof.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 9th day of February2007:     Daniel F. Cole, Director      /s/ Daniel F. Cole        Richard A. Liddy, Director      /s/ Richard A. Liddy        Steven R. Sullivan, Director      /s/ Steven R. Sullivan        Thomas R. Voss, Director      /s/Thomas R. Voss        STATE OF MISSOURI )    ) SS.  CITY OF ST. LOUIS )       On this 9th day of February, 2007, before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for saidState, personally appeared the above-named directors of CILCORP Inc., known to me to be the personsdescribed in and who executed the foregoing power of attorney and acknowledged to me that theyexecuted the same as their free act and deed for the purposes therein stated.     IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal.       /s/ Debby Anzalone     Debby Anzalone    Notary Public- Notary Seal    STATE OF MISSOURI- ST. LOUIS COUNTY    Commission #06435722    My Commission Expires 05/04/2010
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00032

- CV
In the Interest of M.K.T. and B.S.T., Minor Children

On Appeal from the 52nd District Court of Coryell County , Texas Trial Cause No. CD

- 10

- 39625

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having conside red this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and r emanded

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjud ged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 24 , 2015
27192

#### State v. Gushiken

Affirmed
Exhibit 99.1


      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Calprop Corporation (the "Company")
hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report")fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 6, 2003 (effective as of March 28, 2003)


                                        /s/ Victor Zaccaglin
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Victor Zaccaglin
                                        Chairman of the Board
                                        Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Calprop Corporation (the "Company")
hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 6, 2003 (effective as of March 28, 2003)


                                        /s/ Mark F. Spiro
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Mark F. Spiro
                                        VicePresident/Secretary/Treasurer
                                        (Chief Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of infoUSA Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, (i) amendment no. 1 to this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.   Date:August 10, 2004 */s/ Raj Das* Raj Das,  Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-10890

Dominique Esparza, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Abe Partington; Dustin Koch; City of Waxahachie, 

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CV-1336

Before Clement, Elrod, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Dominique Esparza, currently Texas prisoner # 02239621, filed a 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint while he was in pretrial detention arising from three 

2018 felony charges. He raised multiple claims arising from his unrelated 

2017 arrest on misdemeanor charges of resisting arrest and driving without a 

valid license. After dismissing the § 1983 case without prejudice for failure 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 6, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-10890 Document: 00515926049 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/06/2021
No. 19-10890

2

to comply with a court order and for want of prosecution, the district court 

denied Esparza leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on the basis that an 

appeal would not be in good faith. Esparza now seeks leave to appeal IFP. 

If needed, we must sua sponte examine the basis for our jurisdiction. 

Perez v. Stephens, 784 F.3d 276, 280 (5th Cir. 2015). A timely notice of appeal 

is a jurisdictional requirement for an appeal in a civil matter. Bowles v. Russell, 

551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The notice of appeal in a civil action must be filed 

within 30 days of entry of the judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. 

P. 4(a)(1)(A). Esparza did not file a timely appeal or request an extension of 

time under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(A). 

A district court may reopen the time to appeal under Rule 4(a)(6). See

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). Rule 4(a)(6) gives the district court the discretion 

to reopen the time to appeal if: (1) the court finds that the moving party did 

not receive notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 77(d) of the entry 

of the judgment sought to be appealed within 21 days after entry; (2) the 

motion seeking relief under Rule 4(a)(6) is filed within 180 days after the 

judgment is entered or within 14 days after the moving party receives notice 

under Rule 77(d) of the entry, whichever is earlier; and (3) the court finds 

that no party would be prejudiced by reopening the appeal period. Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(a)(6).

Here, the untimely notice of appeal filed by Esparza arguably could be 

construed as a motion to reopen under Rule 4(a)(6). Thus, the action should

be remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of deciding whether, 

in light of that motion, the time to file the notice of appeal should be reopened

under Rule 4(a)(6). After issuing its ruling, the district court shall return the 

case to this court for further proceedings or dismissal, as appropriate.

LIMITED REMAND.

Case: 19-10890 Document: 00515926049 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/06/2021
#### LANDERS, FRARY & CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAND SILVER CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Oct. 30, 1939.

T. Clay Lindsey and George N. Robillard, both of Hartford, Conn., for appellant.

Abraham Moscowitz, of New York City, for appellee.

Before SWAN, CHASE, and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 233 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 961 

[Report No. 114–307] 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

subpart F exemption for active financing income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mr. TIBERI (for himself, Mr. NEAL, Mr. KIND, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, 

Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. REED, Mr. ROSKAM, 

Mr. YOUNG of Indiana, and Mr. BOUSTANY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

OCTOBER 23, 2015 

Additional sponsors: Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. 

SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. MARCHANT, Mrs. 

NOEM, and Mr. PAULSEN

OCTOBER 23, 2015 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on February 12, 2015] 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 961 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the subpart F exemption for active financing income. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 961 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Active Fi5 nancing Exception Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMANENT SUBPART F EXEMPTION FOR ACTIVE 

7 FINANCING INCOME. 

8 (a) BANKING, FINANCING, OR SIMILAR BUSINESSES.— 

9 Section 954(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relat10 ing to special rule for income derived in the active conduct 

11 of banking, financing, or similar businesses) is amended by 

12 striking paragraph (9). 

13 (b) INSURANCE BUSINESSES.—Section 953(e) of such 

14 Code (relating to exempt insurance income) is amended by 

15 striking paragraph (10) and by redesignating paragraph 

16 (11) as paragraph (10). 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this 

18 section shall apply to taxable years of a foreign corporation 

19 beginning after December 31, 2014, and to taxable years 

20 of United States shareholders with or within which such 

21 taxable years of such foreign corporation end. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 233 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 961 

[Report No. 114–307] 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

active financing income. permanently extend the subpart F exemption for 

OCTOBER 23, 2015 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE 

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498 

 OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

 August 9, 2012 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Reports - Supporting Documents for 2017-

2025 Light-Duty (LD) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Standards 

FROM: Arvon L. Mitcham, Program Manager/Engineer 

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 

This memo covers two documents from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) that 

were used to support the credit methodologies for air conditioning (A/C) and off-cycle, 

solar/thermal control technologies: 

• NREL Technical Report #NREL/TP-540-42454 (January 2008): “Vehicle Ancillary 

Load Reduction Project Close-Out Report: An Overview of the Task and a Compilation 

of the Research Results;” J. Rugh and J. Farrington

(http://www.nrel.gov/vehiclesandfuels/ancillary_loads/pdfs/42454.pdf); 

• NREL Technical Report #NREL/CP-540-40986 and SAE 2007-01-1194 (April 2007): 

“Reduction in Vehicle Temperatures and Fuel Use from Cabin Ventilation, SolarReflective Paint, and a New Solar-Reflective Glazing;” John P. Rugh, Lawrence Chaney, 

Jason Lustbader (National Renewable Energy Laboratory), John Meyer (Visteon), 

Mukesh Rustagi, Kurt Olson (PPG Industries), Rupert Kogler (Webasto AG) 

(http://www.nrel.gov/vehiclesandfuels/ancillary_loads/pdfs/40986.pdf) 

 

Both documents are in the document and also publicly available at the web addresses listed 

above.