alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2010-Oct-16

United States Powered Paragliding Association (USPPA) 931 West 75 th Street #137-150, Naperville, IL 60565 737jeff@gmail.com

To Whom It May Concern, Pilots in our sport, powered paragliding, enjoy two valuable exemptions to FAR 103 that allow two-place training with Powered Paragliders, USPPA #9751A (Docket 

### FAA-2002-12476) and ASC #9785A (Docket FAA-2001-10583). These are indeed making our sport safer by allowing two-place training but we would like a clarification in order to insure we are operating within the law. The applicability language says:

“ 3. All flights operating under this exemption must be for training purposes only. This exemption applies only to flights for the purpose of giving instruction in foot-launched, two-place powered paragliders.” ASC has interpreted this to mean that, if the powered paraglider is foot launchable, it may have wheels, and it may take off and/or land using those wheels, legally under the exemption. The USPPA agrees that this interpretation would indeed make two place tandem training safely available to more instructors. And if this interpretation is correct then we will educate our instructor members accordingly. Would you please provide clarification by answering the questions below? 1. Is it acceptable that a foot launchable powered paraglider that happens to have wheels be launched or landed on a tandem instructional flight, using those wheels, under either exemption listed above? 

### Further, the USPPA exemption grant says: The petitioner defines a powered paraglider as “any ultralight vehicle where the powerplant is attached to the pilot and the pilot/student supports at least their own weight on foot during launch and landing until the wing begins generating lift.” The intent of this wording was to allow the motor to support its own weight, even if that means wheels, so that lightweight pilots can still do foot launching. The instructor and student run during takeoff and landing but the motor supports its own weight. Such craft are being designed but the builders, understandably, want to make sure their craft will indeed operating appropriately under the law. which brings up the last question: 2. Is it acceptable that the motor unit has skids or wheels intended to support its own weight during launch and landing. The instructor and student are supporting their own weight during the launch and landing.Thank you for clarifying this issue.

Jeff Goin President United States Powered Paragliding Association
# C_2016202EN.01011201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/112 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/112

---

Article 148

(ex Article 128 TEC)

(ex Article 128 TEC)

1.   The European Council shall each year consider the employment situation in the Union and adopt conclusions thereon, on the basis of a joint annual report by the Council and the Commission.

2.   On the basis of the conclusions of the European Council, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the Employment Committee referred to in Article 150, shall each year draw up guidelines which the Member States shall take into account in their employment policies. These guidelines shall be consistent with the broad guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 121(2).

3.   Each Member State shall provide the Council and the Commission with an annual report on the principal measures taken to implement its employment policy in the light of the guidelines for employment as referred to in paragraph 2.

4.   The Council, on the basis of the reports referred to in paragraph 3 and having received the views of the Employment Committee, shall each year carry out an examination of the implementation of the employment policies of the Member States in the light of the guidelines for employment. The Council, on a recommendation from the Commission, may, if it considers it appropriate in the light of that examination, make recommendations to Member States.

5.   On the basis of the results of that examination, the Council and the Commission shall make a joint annual report to the European Council on the employment situation in the Union and on the implementation of the guidelines for employment.

---
EXHIBIT 24.1
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


The  undersigned,  as Chairman and Chief Executive  Officer of Central and South
West Corporation  (the  "Corporation"),  hereby makes,  constitutes and appoints
Glenn D. Rosilier and Lawrence B. Connors and each of them  severally,  his true
and lawful  attorneys-in-fact  and  agents,  each with full power and  authority
(acting  alone and  without  the others) to execute in the name and on behalf of
the undersigned,  in any and all capacities,  the Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for 1999 and any and all  amendments  thereto,  to be filed  under the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as  amended,  and any  other  documents  and
instruments  incidental thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto
and all  documents in connection  therewith,  with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission,  hereby granting to such attorneys-in-fact,  and agents, and each of
them,  full power and authority of  substitution  and revocation in the premises
and full  power and  authority  to do and  perform  each and every act and thing
requisite and  necessary to be done in and about the premises,  as fully for all
intents and purposes as the  undersigned  might or could do in person and hereby
ratifying and confirming all that such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, or any of
them, may do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have hereunto  executed this Power of Attorney this 19th
day of January, 2000.



                                               /s/ E. R. Brooks
                                               E. R. Brooks
                                               Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                               and Director




Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of January, 2000.



                                               /s/ Judy A. Hall
                                               Notary Public
                                               State of Texas

My Commission Expires:  July 20, 2003
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of
Form 10-K/A of Certron Corporation
(the Company) for the year ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I,
Marshall I. Kass, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                      |  |                                                  
| |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Marshall I. Kass
| |  |                     
| |  | Name:                |  | Marshall I. Kass                                 
| |  | Title:               |  | Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | Date:                |  | February 23, 2004                                

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company, and will
be retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2016202EN.01015301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/153 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/153

---

Article 236

The European Council shall adopt by a qualified majority:

| (a) | a decision establishing the list of Council configurations, other than those of the General Affairs Council and of the Foreign Affairs Council, in accordance with Article 16(6) of the Treaty on European Union; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

a decision establishing the list of Council configurations, other than those of the General Affairs Council and of the Foreign Affairs Council, in accordance with Article 16(6) of the Treaty on European Union;

| (b) | a decision on the Presidency of Council configurations, other than that of Foreign Affairs, in accordance with Article 16(9) of the Treaty on European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

a decision on the Presidency of Council configurations, other than that of Foreign Affairs, in accordance with Article 16(9) of the Treaty on European Union.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PEER ASSOCIATES LLC,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 348 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of July, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Custom er Service Hotline: 1 - 800 - 438 - 2474 UNITED STA

TES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A GENCY

REGION III 1650 A rch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 - 2029 Mr. Ali Mirzakhalili, P.E. August 3, 2009 Administrator, Air Quality Management Division of Air and Waste Management Delaware Department of Natural Resources And Environmental Control 156 South State Street Dover, Delaware 19901 Dear Mr. Mirzakhalili, : On June 29, 2009, EPA received a revision to the Delaware State I mplementation Plan (SI P) from the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) pertaining to administrative and non
- substantive changes to 36 Delaware SI P regulations . EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically

complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice ( D FRN). If members of y our staff have any questions, they

may direct them to Harold A. Frankford, Office of Air Programs , at (215) 814
- 2108
. He is the principal contact for this rulemaking action
. Sincere ly , /s/ Diana Esher , Acting Director Air Protection Division (3AP00)
# C_2016202EN.01035901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/359 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/359

---

65.   Declaration by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on Article 75 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on Article 75 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The United Kingdom fully supports robust action with regard to adopting financial sanctions designed to prevent and combat terrorism and related activities. Therefore, the United Kingdom declares that it intends to exercise its right under Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice to take part in the adoption of all proposals made under Article 75 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---
# C_2016202EN.01013401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/134 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/134

---

Article 193

(ex Article 176 TEC)

(ex Article 176 TEC)

The protective measures adopted pursuant to Article 192 shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective measures. Such measures must be compatible with the Treaties. They shall be notified to the Commission.

---
Consent of Independent Auditors'




 Exhibit 10(i)




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT


 



To the Board of Directors of




Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company


 



We consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-73406 on Form N-4 of our report dual dated March 1, 2002 and March 9, 2002
on Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs referring to the use of statutory accounting practices and the change of certain accounting practices as a result of
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Insurance’s adoption of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual effective January 1, 2001, all of which practices differ from accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America), appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Statement
of Additional Information.


 



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP




Hartford, Connecticut




May 2, 2002
AFS-13-489-E

August 29, 2013

 Exemption No. 10859

 Regulatory Docket No: FAA-2013-0678

Ms. Joanne Davis

Parent of Billy Davis

6 Belvedare Drive Montrose 3765

Victoria, Australia

Dear Ms. Davis:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received July 29, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Billy Davis for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Billy to exceed the 

specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by 

AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States 

(U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Billy.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.
2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Grant

of Exemption No 9834.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Billy Davis an exemption from § 121.311(b). In addition, 

any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Billy is aboard its 

aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary to allow 

him to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Billy’s parents or 

a caregiver accompanying him. Billy Davis may only occupy a passenger seat with no 

passenger seated behind him. In addition, Billy’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this 

exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovich

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards

 Service

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1252-1253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00104]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-81,250]


Schneider Electric, U.S.A., Subsidiary of Schneider Electric, 
Power Business Unit, Power Solutions Division, Including On-Site Leased 
Workers From Volt Workforces Solutions and Resource Tek, Lavergne, TN; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on February 7, 2012, applicable to workers of Schneider Electric, 
U.S.A., subsidiary of Schneider Electric, Power Business Unit, Power 
Solutions Division, including on-site leased workers from Volt 
Workforces Solutions, LaVergne, Tennessee. The workers are engaged in 
activities related to the production of electric monitoring devices 
used for measuring and monitoring electric consumption. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on February 28, 2012 (77 FR 12083).
    At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information from the 
company shows that workers leased from Resource Tek were employed on-
site at the LaVergne, Tennessee location of Schneider Electric, U.S.A., 
Power Business Unit, Power Solutions Division. The Department has 
determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of 
Schneider Electric, U.S.A., Power Business Unit, Power Solutions 
Division to be considered leased workers.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by a shift in 
production to India. Based on these findings, the Department is 
amending this certification to include workers leased from Resource Tek 
working on-site at the LaVergne, Tennessee location of the subject 
firm. The amended notice applicable to TA-W-81,250 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers from Schneider Electric, U.S.A., Subsidiary of 
Schneider Electric,

[[Page 1253]]

Power Business Unit, Power Solutions Division, including on-site 
leased workers from Volt Workforces Solutions and Resource Tek, 
LaVergne, Tennessee, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after February 13, 2010, through February 7, 2014, 
and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial 
separation from employment on date of certification through two 
years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act 
of 1974, as amended.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of November, 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2013-00104 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# C_2016203EN.01000901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/9

---

Article 11

The Commission shall publish the research programmes referred to in Articles 7, 8 and 10, and also regular progress reports on their implementation.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XXI

ENERGY

ENERGY

Article 194

1.   In the context of the establishment and functioning of the internal market and with regard for the need to preserve and improve the environment, Union policy on energy shall aim, in a spirit of solidarity between Member States, to:

| (a) | ensure the functioning of the energy market; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

ensure the functioning of the energy market;

| (b) | ensure security of energy supply in the Union; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

ensure security of energy supply in the Union;

| (c) | promote energy efficiency and energy saving and the development of new and renewable forms of energy; and |
| --- | --- |

(c)

promote energy efficiency and energy saving and the development of new and renewable forms of energy; and

| (d) | promote the interconnection of energy networks. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

promote the interconnection of energy networks.

2.   Without prejudice to the application of other provisions of the Treaties, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish the measures necessary to achieve the objectives in paragraph 1. Such measures shall be adopted after consultation of the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

Such measures shall not affect a Member State's right to determine the conditions for exploiting its energy resources, its choice between different energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply, without prejudice to Article 192(2)(c).

3.   By way of derogation from paragraph 2, the Council, acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure, shall unanimously and after consulting the European Parliament, establish the measures referred to therein when they are primarily of a fiscal nature.

---
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  the
undersigned  officers of Newgold,  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
do hereby  certify with respect to the  Quarterly  Report of the Company on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

         (1) the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information  contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                     NEWGOLD, INC.


Dated:  December 29, 2004       /s/ SCOTT DOCKTER
                                --------------------------------------------
                                Scott Dockter, President and Chief Executive
                                Officer

Dated:  December 29, 2004       /s/ JAMES KLUBER
                                --------------------------------------------
                                James Kluber, Chief Financial Officer