T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T EDDI E D. KN I GH T, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. L E A , C ap ta in ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 16909 D. C . No . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 7 5 1 - F C DC MK ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia F r a nk C . D a m r e l l , J r . , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry10, 2011 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E dd i e D . K ni gh t , a C al i forni a s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c o u rt’s s u m m a ryju d g m e n t in h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e to h is s a f

e ty . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . T

oguc hiv . Chung , 3 9 1 F .3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e 

# FI LED JAN 24 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 16909 2 a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y grant ed sum m ary j ud gm entt o d ef endant s L ea , O f t i e da hl , G ow e r , a nd H a l e , be c aus e K ni ghtf a i l e d t o r a i s e age nui ne i s s ue of m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rth e s e d e f e n d a n ts d is r e g a r d e da n e x c e s s iv e r is kto h is s a f e tyo rr e s p o n d e du n r e a s o n ab lyto s u c h r is k . Se e Farm e rv . B r e nnan , 5 1 1 U . S. 825, 83 7, 84 4-45 (199 4) (apri son o ff i ci ali s notl i abl e f

or del i bera t e i nd i ff

er ence unl e s s he kne w of

a nd di s r e ga r de d a n e xc e s s i ve r i s k t o the i nm a t e ’ s s a f e ty ; a nd, e v e n if th e o f f ic ia l k n e w o f

s u c h r is k , h e is n o t liab le if h e “r e s p o n d e dr e a s o n ab ly t o the ri sk, even i f the harm ul t i m at el y w as no tavert ed”) . W e do nota ddr e s s K ni ght ’ s c l a i m s a ga i ns tde f e nda nt s W ong, L y ons , a nd Si mme r s o n , b e c au s e K n i g h td i dn o ts p e c i f i c a l l ya n dd i s t i n c t l ya r g u e th e s e c l a i ms o n ap p e a l. See E ntm ’t

R es earc h G rp. , Inc. v. G enes is Cre at i ve G rp. , Inc. , 122 F . 3d 1 2 1 1 , 1 2 1 7 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 7 ) ( “W e r e v ie w o n lyis s u e s w h ic h a r e a r g u e ds p e c if ic a lly a nd di s t i nc t l yi n apa rty ’ s ope ni ng br i e f . W e w i l l notm a nuf

a c tur e a r gum e nt s f

or a n appe l l a nt , a nd aba r e a s s e rt i on doe s notpr e s e rve ac l a i m . . . . ” ( c i t a t i on om i tt ed)) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g K n ig h t’s m o tio n s to e x te n dth e d is c o v e ryd e a d lin e a n df o rac o n tin u a n c e u n d e rF e d e r a l R u le o f C iv il P r o c e du r e 5 6 ( f

) . See T atum v. C i t

y & Cnt y. of Sa n Francisc o , 441 F . 3d 1090, 110009- 16909 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) ( s tan d a r do f r e v ie w a n dR u le 5 6 ( f

) r e q u ir e m e n ts ) ; Zi v kov i c v . S. Cal. E dis on C o. , 302 F . 3d 1080, 1087- 88 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( the di s tr i c tc ourtdi d not ab u se i t s d i scret i o n b y d en yi n g a req u estt o ex t en dth e d i sco v ery d ead l i n e b ecau se the m ovi ng pa rtyf

a i l e d t o s how “ good c aus e ” t o m odi f ythe pr e tr i a l s c he dul i ng order) . W e are u n p ersu ad edb y K n i g h t ’ s rem ai n i n g co n t en t i o n s, i n cl u d i n g th o se c o n c e rn in g a m e n d m e n t o f th e c o m p la in t. AF F I RME D.