alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Civil War Troops Quartered in the Capitol Plaque
        
                  Text of the plaque is below.

THIS TABLET RECORDS THE FACT THAT THE
FOLLOWING TROOPS WERE QUARTERED IN THE
UNITED STATES CAPITOL IN RESPONSE TO
PRESIDENT LINCOLN'S CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS
*** APRIL 15, 1861 ***

MASSACHUSETTS
SIXTH REGIMENT OF MASSACHUSETTS
EIGHTH REGIMENT OF MASSACHUSETTS
FIFTH REGIMENT OF MASSACHUSETTS

NEW YORK
SEVENTH REGIMENT (NEW YORK STATE MILITIA)
ELLSWORTH'S FIRE ZOUAVES (ELEVENTH NEW YORK REGIMENT)
SEVENTY-FIRST REGIMENT
FIFTH NEW YORK REGIMENT

PENNSYLVANIA
LOGAN GUARDS OF LEWISTOWN
THE WASHINGTON ARTILLERISTS OF POTTSVILLE
THE NATIONAL LIGHT INFANTRY OF POTTSVILLE
THE ALLEN INFANTRY RIFLES OF ALLENTOWN
THE RINGGOLD LIGHT ARTILLERY OF READING
THE SEVENTEETH REGIMENT OF
PENNSYLVANIA VOLUNTEER INFANTRY

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
COMPANIES E.A.C. AND F (NATIONAL GUARD)
MECHANICS' UNION RIFLES

Authorized by 88th Congress of the United States – August 17, 1964 Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
SC-184-7b (04-17) Destroy previous editions. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION

ALMOND SALMONELLA VERIFICATION PROGRAM

NON-CONFORMITY AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST 

A. Equipment B. Processor Name & Address

Equipment I.D.: Company Name:

Date of the last verification to be in compliance: Address:

Report No: Page of

Date Started: Company Contact Name:

Date Completed (if different than Date Started): Phone:

Inspector Name: Email:

C. Non-Conformity 

Description of Non-Conformity: 

Non-Conformity does not comply with Validation Processes.

Non-Conformity does not meet with Regulations.

D. Company Representative Signature

Signature affirms facts concerning Non-Conformity are correct.

E. Corrective Action (To be completed by Almond Board Representative)

Corrective Action Proposed & Time Frame for Implementation:

F. Follow-Up Action (To be completed by Almond Board Representative)

Follow-up action and date:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Liberty and the Eagle Sculpture

In the niche above the entablature on the south wall of National Statuary Hall stands the heroic-sized figure of Liberty.
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Enrico Causici

Materials
    Plaster

Year
    1819

Dimensions
    13' 7"

Location
      
National Statuary Hall

An American eagle stands to Liberty's right, and the scroll in her right hand is the Constitution of the United States. To her left, a serpent, the symbol of wisdom, is entwined around a section of a column.

Placed here between 1817-1819 when the U.S. Capitol was rebuilt after the fire of 1814, she originally looked down on the House of Representatives which met in the hall during that time.
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    Previous Image
        Next Image Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Timothy Sherlock, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Vice President of Finance ofARI Network Services, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated: March 17, 2006   /s/ Timothy Sherlock Timothy Sherlock
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DynTek, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge and upon a review of the Report that:

(1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Financial Officer, my own due diligence and representations made by
certain members of the Company's senior management.



Dated:  November 14, 2003                    /s/ Steven J. Ross
                                             --------------------------
                                             Steven J. Ross
                                             Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>       5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       9,302,964
<SECURITIES>                                   288,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,792,468
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,383,432
<PP&E>                                      59,260,596
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,568,212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,075,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,013,388
<BONDS>                                     30,757,680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,304,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,075,816
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,163,317
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,684,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,311,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,168,154
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,168,154
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,168,154
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
# C_2016202EN.01035501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/355 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/355

---

51.   Declaration by the Kingdom of Belgium on national Parliaments

Declaration by the Kingdom of Belgium on national Parliaments

Belgium wishes to make clear that, in accordance with its constitutional law, not only the Chamber of Representatives and Senate of the Federal Parliament but also the parliamentary assemblies of the Communities and the Regions act, in terms of the competences exercised by the Union, as components of the national parliamentary system or chambers of the national Parliament.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000879465
<NAME>                        TADEO HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         5,868,957
<SECURITIES>                                   4,333,049
<RECEIVABLES>                                  339,633
<ALLOWANCES>                                   111,500
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,225,257
<PP&E>                                         160,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                 62,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,428,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,393,395
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,585
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,015,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,428,236
<SALES>                                        962,179
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               962,179
<CGS>                                          459,516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  459,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               982,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               111,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (184,974)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (184,974)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (184,974)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)



</TABLE>
NO. 06-14-00234-CR 

NO. 06-14-00235-CR 

MELVIN WAYNE RICHARDSON § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

VS. § FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT 

THE STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS AT TEXARKANA 

 

ON APPEAL FROM THE 

195TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT 

OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 

IN CAUSE NOS. F06-62371-N & F06-68662-N 

 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL ON APPEAL 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: 

 COMES NOW the undersigned attorney, and respectfully requests that she 

be discharged as the attorney of record for the Appellant. In support of this 

motion the Appellant would show the Court the following: 

I. 

 The Appellate Division of the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office was 

appointed by the trial court to represent Appellant in the appeal of his convictions. 

The undersigned attorney was the attorney assigned to the cases. 

II. 

 After a full review of the record in this cause, the undersigned attorney is of 

the opinion that there are no arguable points of error or issues upon which an 

appeal can be predicated and has filed an Anders brief with this Court. 

III. 

 The undersigned attorney has informed Appellant that in her professional 

opinion, the appeal is without merit. The undersigned attorney has also explained 

ACCEPTED

06-14-00234-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

4/20/2015 3:00:45 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/21/2015 9:50:00 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
that Appellant has the right to review the record and file a pro se brief if he so 

desires and has sent Appellant a copy of the record. Appellant has also been 

informed by the undersigned attorney that he may request an extension of time 

from this Honorable Court to file a pro se brief if he so desires. 

IV. 

 Appellant’s last known address is: 

Mr. Melvin Wayne Richardson 

TDCJ #01578684 

Darrington Unit 

59 Darrington Road 

Rosharon, Texas 77583 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned attorney prays 

that this Court will grant this Motion to Withdraw as Counsel on Appeal in the 

above entitled and numbered cause. 

 Respectfully submitted 

 Lynn Richardson 

 Chief Public Defender 

 

 /s/ Nanette Hendrickson 

 Nanette Hendrickson 

 Assistant Public Defender 

 State Bar No. 24081423 

 Frank Crowley Courts Building 

 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-2 

 Dallas, TX. 75207-4399 

 (214) 653-3550 (telephone) 

 (214) 653-3539 (fax) 

 nanette.hendrickson@dallascounty.org 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing motion was served on the 

Dallas County Criminal District Attorney’s Office (Appellate Division), 133 N. 

Riverfront Blvd., LB-19, 10th Floor, Dallas, Texas, 75207, electronic delivery on 

the 20th day of April, 2015 to Lori Ordiway, Assistant District Attorney, at 

DCDAAppeals@dallascounty.org. 

 

/s/ Nanette Hendrickson 

 Nanette Hendrickson
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-01029-CV

Style: Tarris Woods

v. Sandra T. Kenner and Charles E. Twymon, Jr.

Date motion filed*: March 26, 2015

Type of motion: Motion to Abate and Remand for the Execution of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

The clerk’s record includes “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” signed by the trial court and filed on 

December 22, 2014. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 297; see also Vickery v. Comm’n for Lawyer Discipline, 5 S.W.3d 241,

253 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. denied) (citing Grossnickle v. Grossnickle, 935 S.W.2d 830, 

837 n.1 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1996, writ denied)) (recognizing practice of prevailing party submitting

proposed findings of fact).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: April 21, 2015
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-12-0584 SAT Date: 10/10/2012

Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 12

Exposure Based Review : Health: Yes Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR-E,MM,L; DEVEL; KIDNEY; AQUATOX
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-12-0584 FATE: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 2.85 (E) S = 402 mg/L at 25 C (E) VP = 6.0E-3 torr at 25 C (M) BP = 283 C (M) H = 9.08E-6 (E) log Koc = 2.59 (E) log Fish BCF = 1.55 (E) log Fish BAF = 1.74 (E)POTW removal (%) = 0-90 Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk Sorption to soils/sediments = low Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 98 hrs Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 50 da Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 8.5 hr via OH radical PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = U

Health : Health Summary: Absorbed all routes (analog). Concern for irritation to eyes, lungs, and mucous membranes (MSDS); and kidney and developmental toxicity based on [rat oral developmental/reproductive toxicity screen LOEL = 20 mg/kg (kidney toxicity in parental animals), N OEL = 100 mg/kg (developmental toxicity)].

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 2.4 p hosphinate ester SAR daphnid 48-h LC50 18 ester SAR green algal 96-h EC50 6.7 ester SAR fish

_ chronic value 0.008 p hosphinate ester SAR daphnid

_ chronic value 9.6 ester SAR

algal

_ chronic value 2.3 ester SAR
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Posphinate Esters, Esters; SAR chemical class = Phosphate Esters, Esters; MW 222; log Kow = 2.9 (EPI); p H7; liquid with unknown mp; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs Esters, Phosphate SAR Class Esters, Phosphate Ecotox Category Phosphinate Esters

Ecotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
October 13, 1998

20742

#### Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Pecson

Affirmed
140 P.3d 437

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

August 10, 2006

27305

#### State v. Calipjo

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 171 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 171

Electing Members to the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library and 
                    the Joint Committee on Printing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2015

 Mrs. Miller of Michigan submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Electing Members to the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library and 
                    the Joint Committee on Printing.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. ELECTION OF MEMBERS TO JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE 
              LIBRARY AND JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING.

    (a) Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.--The following 
Members are hereby elected to the Joint Committee of Congress on the 
Library, to serve with the chair of the Committee on House 
Administration and the chair of the Subcommittee on the Legislative 
Branch of the Committee on Appropriations:
            (1) Mr. Harper.
            (2) Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania.
            (3) Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California.
    (b) Joint Committee on Printing.--The following Members are hereby 
elected to the Joint Committee on Printing, to serve with the chair of 
the Committee on House Administration:
            (1) Mr. Harper.
            (2) Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois.
            (3) Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania.
            (4) Mr. Vargas.
                                 <all>
```