alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 6

SECTION 6

THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

Article 284

(ex Article 113 TEC)

(ex Article 113 TEC)

1.   The President of the Council and a Member of the Commission may participate, without having the right to vote, in meetings of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank.

The President of the Council may submit a motion for deliberation to the Governing Council of the European Central Bank.

2.   The President of the European Central Bank shall be invited to participate in Council meetings when the Council is discussing matters relating to the objectives and tasks of the ESCB.

3.   The European Central Bank shall address an annual report on the activities of the ESCB and on the monetary policy of both the previous and current year to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, and also to the European Council. The President of the European Central Bank shall present this report to the Council and to the European Parliament, which may hold a general debate on that basis.

The President of the European Central Bank and the other members of the Executive Board may, at the request of the European Parliament or on their own initiative, be heard by the competent committees of the European Parliament.

---
EXHIBIT 10.29

April 11, 2002

Agreement Between Jim Green and Digital Lightwave

Company to advance $175,000 to Jim Green on April 12, 2002.

Jim Green is to use the funds to pay a $100,000 Federal income tax liability
and pay off other debts totaling $75,000.

Dr. Zwan will work with Jim Green to refinance the mortgage on his house and to
increase the mortgage by approximately $200,000.

The company will receive $175,000 of the increase plus interest at 8% and Jim
Green will receive the balance.

Jim Green will provide a second lien on his home to secure the advance and
previous $200,000 loan. The lien will be released once the $175,000 advance is
repaid to the Company.

The Company will provide a $2,000 monthly allowance until the October, 2001
salary reductions are restored.

The Company is responsible for fees on the above refinancing.

All previous employment agreements with Jim Green are rescinded and Jim Green
will receive the standard executive package.


Agreed,


________
Jim Green

For Digital Lightwave


_____________
Dr. Bryan Zwan
# EastTexas2014

Prepared by the Southwest Milk Market Administrator Office	

# EastTexas2015

# EastTexas2016

# EastTexas2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF ALL-COMM MEDIA  CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR
THE YEAR  ENDED  JUNE 30,  1996  INCLUDED  IN THIS  REPORT  ON FORM  10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        Jun-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           Jul-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                             Jun-30-1996
<CASH>                                   1,393,044
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            2,716,654
<ALLOWANCES>                             (34,906)
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         5,103,915
<PP&E>                                   472,378
<DEPRECIATION>                           (173,333)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           13,301,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    3,453,190
<BONDS>                                  1,596,982
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    1,306,358
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                                 31,985
<OTHER-SE>                               6,944,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             13,301,066
<SALES>                                  15,889,210
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         15,889,210
<CGS>                                    10,882,437
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            10,882,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       505,128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (953,289)
<INCOME-TAX>                             141,084
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,094,373)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,094,373)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            $(.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            $(.36)
        


</TABLE>
#### David W. MULLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 3284.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Jan. 27, 1978.

*861Chris J. Rigos, Asst. Public Defender, and Brian Shortell, Public Defender, Anchorage, for appellant.

Monica Jenicek, Asst. Dist. Atty., and Joseph D. Balfe, Dist. Atty., Anchorage, Av-rum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for ap-pellee.

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ.

CONNOR, Justice.

This is a sentence appeal.

While employed at the J. C. Penney warehouse in Anchorage, Alaska, appellant unlawfully took and converted to his own use a refrigerator, bed, bedframe, color television set, and a mirror. Thereafter he was indicted for the offense of embezzlement by an employee of property worth more than $100.00, in violation of AS 11.20.280. He pled nolo contendere to the indictment. Upon conviction, he was sentenced to a term of three years and four months, with two years and four months suspended, the remaining year to be spent in an acceptable program of community service. When the terms of community service had been worked out, the judgment was amended so that appellant was sentenced to three years and four months, with the entire period suspended upon the condition that he enter and complete the twelve-month period of public service outlined in the sentencing proceedings. The statute under which appellant was convicted permits a possible punishment of not less than one year nor more than ten years of imprisonment.

At the time of sentencing, appellant was 22 years old. He had been working since 1972 and had spent two semesters in college. Other than minor traffic violations he had no previous criminal record.

The issue presented in the sentence appeal is whether the trial court was clearly mistaken in failing to order a suspended imposition of sentence, pursuant to AS 12.-55.085, instead of actually imposing a sentence on appellant.

As we noted in *Nattrass v. State,*554 P.2d 399, 401 (Alaska 1976), AS 12.55.-085(a) reposes discretion in the trial court to suspend imposition of the sentence and place the defendant on probation.1 Our review reveals that the trial court carefully considered this question and determined that the sentence should be imposed. We cannot say that in the light of *State v. Chaney,*477 P.2d 441 (Alaska 1970), and the numerous cases applying it, that the sentencing court was clearly mistaken.

AFFIRMED.

1

. In *Nattrass, supra,*at 401, we indicated that in the case of youthful first offenders who have committed nonviolent crimes, the trial court should generally give serious consideration to the sentencing alternative offered by AS 12.55.-085(a). However, we are not persuaded by appellant’s contention that except for the two exclusions mentioned in *Nattrass*— persons with prior records and those who have committed crimes of violence — the trial court must in all cases invoke AS 12.55.085 if the background, capabilities, and mental status of the defendant so warrant, without regard to the type of offense committed. The statute clearly provides for the exercise of discretion by the trial court in these matters.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply576Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Susan Frederick (not verified)PermalinkMarch 12, 2024 - 12:47pmI was amazed to learn that your power plant is over 100 years old.  I retired from the Hayden Power Station in Hayden, Colorado in 2002 after 25 years of service.  Hayden is a much younger plant.  When I hired on in 1977, life span for the plant was about 40 years.  With care and modifications, it is still running.  I was proud to work there and also enjoyed a family type relationship with my co-workers.  I did everything from janitorial, water and coal lab work, warehouse and for a number of months coal handling operator.  If I ever visit Washington DC again, it would be a privilege to tour your plant if that is a possibility.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
September 12, 2005

26518

#### Kaneshiro v. Rapozo; Does v. Sakata

Dismissed
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0597

)

JUSTIN LEE ROMERO, )

Petitioner and Appellant, )

vs. )

)

STATE OF MONTANA, )

Respondent and Appellee.)

)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

ON APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT

THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF

THE STATE OF MONTANA, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY

Honorable Donald L. Harris, Presiding

_____________________________________________________________

WHEREAS, the Appellant has moved this Court to dismiss the abovereferenced mater and good cause appearing therefrom;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, this matter is DISMISSED. 

02/01/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0597
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I served a true and accurate copy of the foregoing Brief 

by electronic delivery via the ECF filing system.

Tim fox, ESQ

Attorney General

P. O. Box 201401

Helena, MT 59620-1401

Attorney for Appellee

GINA DAHL

Billings City Attorney’s Office

210 N 27th Street

Billings, MT 59101

DATED this 1 February 2021

/s/ Martin W. Judnich___________

Martin W. Judnich, Esq. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 1 2021
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, Paul Genova, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                              /s/ Paul Genova
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Paul Genova
                                              President, Chief Financial Officer
                                              August 10, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
```
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL MANAGER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss 1350),
the  undersigned,  Linda J.  Haines,  Principal  Financial  Manager of Nutrition
Management  Services Company, a Pennsylvania  corporation (the "Company"),  does
hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Linda J. Haines
                                       ----------------------------
                                       Linda J. Haines
                                       Principal Financial Manager

February 14, 2004
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 910 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 910

  To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide eligibility under 
 certain highway programs for projects for the installation of vehicle-
   to-infrastructure communication equipment, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2015

Mrs. Miller of Michigan (for herself and Mrs. Lawrence) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide eligibility under 
 certain highway programs for projects for the installation of vehicle-
   to-infrastructure communication equipment, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Safety 
Technology Investment Flexibility Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. VEHICLE-TO-INFRASTRUCTURE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT PROJECTS.

    (a) Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Communication Equipment Defined.--
Section 101(a) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
            ``(35) Vehicle-to-infrastructure communication equipment.--
        The term `vehicle-to-infrastructure communication equipment' 
        means equipment that provides a wireless exchange of critical 
        safety and operational data between highway infrastructure and 
        vehicles, intended primarily to avoid or mitigate vehicle 
        collisions and enable a wide range of other safety, mobility, 
        and environmental benefits.''.
    (b) Eligible Projects Under National Highway Performance Program.--
Section 119(d)(2) of such title is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                    ``(Q) Installation of vehicle-to-infrastructure 
                communication equipment.''.
    (c) Eligible Projects Under Surface Transportation Program.--
Section 133(b) of such title is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(27) Installation of vehicle-to-infrastructure 
        communication equipment.''.
    (d) Eligible Projects Under Highway Safety Improvement Program.--
Section 148(a)(4)(B) of such title is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                            ``(xxv) Installation of vehicle-to-
                        infrastructure communication equipment.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.16
    
  Participant:
    
    «First» «Last»Date of Grant:
    
    «Award_Date»Number of Restricted Stock Units granted:       «Shares»
  1. Grant of Restricted Stock Units
  2. Performance Conditions.
 - 1 -




---



##### 



Performance Period
 Relative Performance
 (c) Performance Criteria
 Determination of Final Awards
 Dividend Equivalent Rights
   Delivery of Common Stock
 - 2 -




---



##### 



Non-Transferability.
 Termination of Employment
 Forfeiture of All Rights
 Forfeiture of Pro-Rated Rights
 Additional Forfeiture Provisions
 Immediate Vesting of All Rights.
 Definitions
 - 3 -




---



##### 



th
 Designation of Beneficiary
 ithholding of Income and Other Taxes.
 . Adjustments in the Event of Change in Common Stock.
 . Legal Compliance
 - 4 -




---



##### 



Miscellaneous Provisions.
 Effect on Other Employee Benefit Plans
 No Employment Rights
 Entire Agreement; Amendment
 Governing Law
 Notices
   Compliance with Laws
 - 5 -




---



##### 



Binding Agreement; Assignment
 Counterparts
 Headings
 Further Assurances
 Severability
 - 6 -




---



##### 



BOWNE & CO., INC.By:David J. SheaParticipant:Name:
    
    «First» «Last»Signature:
 - 7 -




---



##### 



Performance Chart
 
    
    For the 2008 Performance Period, performance for Plan purposes shall be evaluated with
respect to the financial performance of Bowne & Co. for that 1-year period of time, as
measured by the Companys Return on Invested Capital (ROIC).
    
    ROIC for the applicable 1-year period of time shall be calculated by the Companys Chief
Financial Officer and approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. ROIC
above 16.0%will be reduced to 16.0%. The percent of RSUs to be issued to Participant as a
Final Award will then be determined from the table below. ROIC below 11.0%will result in
no payout to Participant.
    
    If the calculated ROIC is other than 11.0%, 13.5%, or 16.0%, the percent of RSU to be
issued to Participant as a Final Award will be interpolated on a straight-line basis.
 Applicable Percent Return on
    
    Percent of RSUs to be IssuedLevel of Performance
    
    Invested Capital
    
    as Final AwardThreshold
    
    11.0%
    
    50%of RSUsTarget
    
    13.5%
    
    100%of RSUsMaximum
    
    16.0%
    
    200%of RSUs
 - 8 -
# C_2016203EN.01001001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/10

---

Article 15

The Commission shall establish a procedure by which Member States, persons and undertakings may use it as an intermediary for exchanging provisional or final results of their research, insofar as these results have not been acquired by the Community under research contracts awarded by the Commission.

This procedure must be such as to ensure the confidential nature of the exchange. The results communicated may, however, be transmitted by the Commission to the Joint Nuclear Research Centre for documentation purposes; this shall not entail any right of use to which the communicating party has not agreed.

---
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 960 

AN ACT 

Designate the Department of Veterans Affairs communitybased outpatient clinic in Newark, Ohio, as the Daniel 

L. Kinnard VA Clinic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 960 EH

1 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress finds the following: 

3 (1) Daniel L. Kinnard was born on October 21, 

4 1949, in Mount Vernon, Ohio. 

5 (2) While residing in Newark, Ohio, Daniel L. 

6 Kinnard enlisted in the Army at Fort Hayes, Ohio, 

7 on November 14, 1966, and served as a Specialist 

8 Fourth Class in the 101st Airborne Division. 

9 (3) Specialist Kinnard was awarded the Na10 tional Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service 

11 Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Parachutist 

12 Badge, Sharpshooter Badge with Rifle Bar, Bronze 

13 Star for Valor, Purple Heart, Good Conduct Medal, 

14 and the Combat Medical Badge. 

15 (4) Specialist Kinnard’s citation for the Bronze 

16 Star said, ‘‘For heroism in combat against a hostile 

17 force in the Republic of Vietnam on 17 February 

18 1968. Specialist Four Kinnard distinguished himself 

19 while attached as a medic on a combat operation 

20 near Quang Tri, Republic of Vietnam. The point 

21 platoon made contact with enemy positions in a 

22 hedgerow and two of the point men were seriously 

23 wounded. Without hesitation, Specialist Kinnard 

24 rushed through the heavy volume of enemy fire to 

25 reach the wounded men. With complete disregard for 

26 his own personal safety, Specialist Kinnard remained 
3 

•HR 960 EH

1 exposed to enemy fire while he treated the wounded 

2 men. Once he administered first aid to the wounded, 

3 Specialist Kinnard organized their evacuation under 

4 fire. His personal bravery and devotion to duty were 

5 in keeping with the highest traditions of the military 

6 service and reflect great credit upon himself, his 

7 unit, and United States Army.’’. 

8 (5) Specialist Kinnard was killed in action on 

9 March 9, 1968, while rendering aid to his fellow 

10 paratroopers. 

11 SEC. 2. DANIEL L. KINNARD VA CLINIC. 

12 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af13 fairs community-based outpatient clinic located in New14 ark, Ohio, shall after the date of the enactment of this 

15 Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Daniel L. Kinnard 

16 VA Clinic’’. 

17 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg18 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

19 States to the Department of Veterans Affairs community20 based outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall 
4 

•HR 960 EH

1 be deemed to be a reference to the Daniel L. Kinnard VA 

2 Clinic. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 960 

AN ACT 

Designate the Department of Veterans Affairs comas the Daniel L. Kinnard VA Clinic. munity-based outpatient clinic in Newark, Ohio,