alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                      |  |                                       
|------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Name                                  |  | State of Incorporation or Organization
|                                      | 
|Carrols Corporation                   |  | Delaware                              
|                                      | 
|Carrols LLC                           |  | Delaware                              
|                                      | 
|Carrols Realty Holdings Corp.         |  | Delaware                              
|                                      | 
|Carrols Realty I Corp.                |  | Delaware                              
|                                      | 
|Carrols Realty II Corp.               |  | Delaware                              
|                                      | 
|Carrols J.G. Corp.                    |  | Delaware                              
|                                      | 
|Quanta Advertising Corp.              |  | New York                              
|                                      | 
|Pollo Franchise, Inc.                 |  | Florida                               
|                                      | 
|Pollo Operations, Inc.                |  | Florida                               
|                                      | 
|Taco Cabana, Inc.                     |  | Delaware                              
|                                      | 
|TP Acquisition Corp.                  |  | Texas                                 
|                                      | 
|T.C. Management, Inc.                 |  | Delaware                              
|                                      | 
|Get Real, Inc.                        |  | Delaware                              
|                                      | 
|Texas Taco Cabana, L.P.               |  | Texas                                 
|                                      | 
|TC Lease Holdings III, V and VI, Inc. |  | Texas                                 
|                                      | 
|Cabana Bevco, LLC                     |  | Texas                                 
|                                      | 
|TC Bevco, LLC                         |  | Texas                                 
|                                      | 
|Cabana Beverages, Inc.                |  | Texas                                 
|                                      | 
|TPAQ Holding Corporation              |  | Delaware
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 968 

To make the acquisition, installation, and maintenance of security cameras, 

safety lighting, and building locking mechanisms in public housing an 

eligible activity under community development block grant program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2015 

Mr. JEFFRIES (for himself, Mr. CAPUANO, and Mr. KING of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To make the acquisition, installation, and maintenance of 

security cameras, safety lighting, and building locking 

mechanisms in public housing an eligible activity under 

community development block grant program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘P.J.’s Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES. 

6 Paragraph (4) of section 105(a) of the Housing and 

7 Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 

8 5305(a)(4)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘energy effiVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:20 Feb 25, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H968.IH H968

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 968 IH

1 ciency’’ the following: ‘‘and rehabilitation to improve pub2 lic safety, including the acquisition, installation, and main3 tenance of security cameras, safety lighting, and building 

4 locking mechanisms in public housing’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,078
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,925
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     53,758
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        188,091
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 260,965
<DEPOSITS>                                     238,927
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,619
<LONG-TERM>                                        932
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,728
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 260,965
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,204
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  744
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    62
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,010
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,245
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,264
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,746
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      160
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   1
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,106
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,106
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.78
<LOANS-NON>                                         53
<LOANS-PAST>                                       192
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   101
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,041
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,821
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       27
<RECOVERIES>                                         5
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,959
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,959
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FORM 10-Q/A AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            1,684,392
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    39,599,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (544,130)
<INVENTORY>                                      45,485,368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                103,703,673
<PP&E>                                           82,134,541
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (17,266,459)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  208,117,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            59,374,581
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            151,110
<OTHER-SE>                                       71,034,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    208,117,456
<SALES>                                          66,513,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 66,513,726
<CGS>                                            53,999,053
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    53,999,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 10,956,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,940,790
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     822,362
<INCOME-TAX>                                        359,339
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 463,023
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        463,023
<EPS-BASIC>                                             .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .03


</TABLE>
Technology Investment Plan (TIP) No.:______________ 

AD700 or AD672 No.:___________________ 

Acquisition Title:________________________________ 

Attachment 2 

 UNDUE BURDEN DETERMINATION 

 (Modified from Attachment Two of AGAR Advisory No. 49) 

The Requiring Official must provide a written determination to the Contracting Officer 

for inclusion in the file. When acquiring commercial items, an undue burden 

determination is not required to address individual standards that cannot be met with 

supplies or services available in the commercial marketplace in time to meet the 

Agency delivery requirements. All undue burden determinations will be made in 

connection with Departmental level oversight of OCIO and OGC. 

The determination should describe: 

1. The commercial items, products or services required to meet the Agency's 

needs; 

2. The dollar value of the acquisition, including any options; 

3. The applicable Section 508 Standards (36 CFR, Part 1194); 

4. The market research performed to locate commercial items that meet the 

applicable standards; 

5. Indicate which standards can be met and which cannot; 

6. In determining whether compliance with all or part of the applicable 

accessibility standards would be an undue burden, the Agency must 

consider the difficulty, expense, impact and resources available to its 

programs if the product is acquired. If the monetary expense is deemed 

prohibitive, explain the costs and how they were estimated. 

7. The steps the Agency is taking to reduce the use of the undue burden 

exception in future procurements; and 

8. The alternative means of access the Agency will provide to allow 

individuals with disabilities to use information or data. 

Approval of Determination 

In order for an undue burden determination to be considered, supporting 

documentation must be included that addresses all eight factors that are listed 

above and signed per the defined signature blocks. The determination must be 

approved in writing prior to the Contracting Officer awarding a task or delivery 

order, purchase order or contract. 
Technology Investment Plan (TIP) No.:______________ 

AD700 or AD672 No.:___________________ 

Acquisition Title:________________________________ 

Signed ________________________________ __________________________ 

 Program Requiring Official Date 

Signed ________________________________ __________________________ 

 Program Section 508 Representative Date 

Signed _____________________________________ __________________________ 

 AMS Section 508 Coordinator (Designee) Date 

Signed __________________________________ __________________________ 

 AMS Chief Information Officer Date 

Signed ______________________________________ __________________________ 

 USDA, Office of the Chief Information Officer Date 

Signed __________________________________ __________________________ 

 USDA, Office of the General Counsel Date
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 2, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41718 Summary Calendar

ROYAL MAYNE HOPPER, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CV-542

-------------------- Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Royal Mayne Hopper, Jr., incarcerated federal prisoner # 27844-048, appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Social Security Commissioner’s nonpayment of his social security retirement benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 402(x)(1). Hopper argues that the nonpayment of his benefits violates 42 U.S.C. § 407(a). We disagree. The Commissioner’s nonpayment of benefits to Hopper pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 402(x) does not fallNo. 02-41718 -2- within 42 U.S.C. § 407(a)’s anti-attachment provisions. See Washington State Dept. of Social and Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler , 123 S. Ct. 1017, 1024-26 (2003). Hopper asserts that the benefits are his property and that the nonpayment of those benefits is a seizure and should fall under the criminal forfeiture statutes. He fails to include his reasons for this conclusion or citations to relevant authority.
See F ED . R. A PP . P. 28(a)(9)(A). Accordingly, Hopper has abandoned this issue on appeal by failing to brief it adequately. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Stephen Austin Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Elisabet Ney

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1905

Location
      
Hall of Columns

This statue of Stephen Austin was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Texas in 1905.

The founder of the state of Texas was born in Austinville, Virginia, on November 3, 1793, and moved with his family to Missouri in 1798. He was educated at Colchester Academy in Connecticut and Transylvania University in Kentucky, and he served in the militia and the territorial legislature. In 1821 he inherited from his father a grant to settle 300 Anglo-Americans in Texas. Austin served as their civil and military leader and their liaison with the authorities. Since Austin's grant was from the Spanish rulers, he traveled to Mexico City between 1822 and 1823 to clarify their legal position with the newly independent Mexican government.

Ten years later he returned to Mexico to ease tensions resulting from American settlements near the border. Because he had brought a grievance petition and a request for statehood, he was imprisoned by General Santa Anna on charges of inciting revolution. After his release in 1835, he presided at the Texas convention, which resulted in the Texas Revolution on October 2, 1835. Austin was made commander-in-chief of the army that marched on the Mexican headquarters in San Antonio, and he was later a commissioner to seek recognition by the United States, negotiate a loan, and enlist volunteers.

Reluctantly he accepted the nomination for president of the Republic of Texas in June 1836 but lost to Sam Houston, who then appointed him secretary of state. Austin died on December 27, 1836, in Columbia, Texas. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Farm Service Agency

NOTICE OF EXCHANGE OF PEANUTS

FOR RELEASE BY 4:00 P.M. CT November 21, 2017

U.S.D.A.’s Farm Service Agency today announced the exchange of peanuts. The peanuts were exchanged under Peanut Exchange No. 4 dated October 27, 2017.

 

Catalog Lot 

Numbers Catalog Company, Location Pounds of CCC Owned Peanuts Exchanged Successful Offeror Pounds of Peanut Butter Delivered to CCC

1-54 Birdsong Corporation, Blakely, GA 54,253,460 Golden Peanut & Tree Nuts Co 8,709,120
#### State ex rel. Bennett v. Pettigrew

24353

04/23/2004

Affirmed
##### 



EXHIBIT 3.2
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO THE
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
  1.
    
    The first paragraph of Article V of the Certificate of Incorporation, which currently reads
as follows:The Corporation shall have the authority to issue an aggregate of 75,000,000 shares,
consisting of 25,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.001 per share (Preferred
Stock) and 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share (Common Stock).is hereby amended to read as follows in its entirety:The Corporation shall have the authority to issue an aggregate of 50,000,000 shares,
consisting of 25,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.001 per share (Preferred
Stock) and 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share (Common Stock).2.
    
    All other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation shall remain as currently written.
   By:
    
    /s/ MICHAEL T. MINOName:
    
    Michael T. MinoTitle:
    
    Vice President and Secretary
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00001-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.L.M.M., et al., Children

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-01857

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFRIMED.

SIGNED April 15, 2015.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 9, 2015

No. 04-14-00856-CV

IN RE Ropal ANDERSON, 

Gerald Busch and Hortencia Morales

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On January 7, 2015, the real party in interest filed an opposed motion to dismiss this 

mandamus proceeding as moot. The relators and respondent may file a response to the 

motion to dismiss in this court no later than January 16, 2015. Any such response must 

conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

It is so ORDERED on January 9th, 2015. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CI, styled In re Matthew Hileman, pending in the 288th Judicial 

District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales presiding.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CDI Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



By:

/s/    ROGER H.
BALLOURoger H. Ballou President and Chief Executive Officer




Dated: March 2, 2010



By:

/s/    MARK A.
KERSCHNERMark A. Kerschner Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




Dated: March 2, 2010



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CDI Corp. and will be retained by CDI Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Farm Service Agency

NOTICE OF SALE OF PEANUTS

FOR RELEASE AT 1:30 P.M. CT February 12, 2018

U.S.D.A.’s Farm Service Agency today announced the sale of peanuts. The peanuts were sold under 

Announcement SMAC3, Invitation No. 7 dated February 01, 2018.

Catalog

Lot No.

Catalog Location Purchaser Tons 

Sold

Bid Price 

(per Ton)

CCC 

Revenue

Peanut 

Type

1 Comyn, TX Birdsong Corporation 258.90 $250.60 $64,880.34 Virginia

Totals 258.90 $64,880.34