alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| 1.  | I      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ARI Network Services,      Inc. (the “Company”); |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects      the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the      Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this    report; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Roy W.      Olivier                    |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Roy      W. Olivier                        |
|   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

----
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply612Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Marilyn Wiles ... (not verified)PermalinkNovember 16, 2018 - 9:14pmStephen,_x000D_ _x000D_ I am enjoying the post about the AOC. I loved working there because of the difference we made in marauding, preserving, and protecting ‚ÄúThe Peoples House.‚Äù_x000D_ _x000D_ Than you for your hard work and most importantly, tanks to all the AOC emlpoyees for doing an awesome job!!!_x000D_ _x000D_ Best regards,_x000D_ _x000D_ Marilyn Wiles
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1313 Prepped byLaTeia Shed



### Document

Number: 

# 80 ) ll-B-5 4 Docket Number: 

# A-88-0 2

Printed 6/12/20089:03:31 AM

Sheet 80of 99P. 2 

## A-88-0 2
Informatio n o n healt ho r ris k assessmen t wa s remove d fromth e docket . Thi s informatio n wa s compile d befor e th e Clea n Ai r Ac t .Amendment s (1990 ) bu t wa s no t use d i n th e developmen t o f th e chromiu

mNESHAP .
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2227

WON YONG KIM,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

THOMAS PATRICK GORMAN,

Trustee - Appellee,

and

JUDY A. ROBBINS, II,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00538-TSE-IDD; 16-10064-

BFK)

Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Won Yong Kim, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Patrick Gorman, OFFICE OF THE 

CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Won Yong Kim appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her appeal from 

the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of her Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding. The district 

court dismissed Kim’s appeal after she failed to timely file a designation of the record. See

Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8009(a)(1). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order 

and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(a); In 

re SPR Corp., 45 F.3d 70, 74 (4th Cir. 1995); In re Serra Builders, Inc., 970 F.2d 1309, 

1311 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Order filed February 25, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00006

- CV

____________ ALI YAZDCHI , Appellant

V.

MAKANSAM INC. D/B/A IDEAL TOWING, Appellee

On Appeal from Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1135418



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due February 5, 2020

. No brief or motion for extension
of time has been filed. If appellant does not file a brief with this court on or before March 9, 2020 , the court wil l dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher, Wise, and Zimmerer.
Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equipment Costs:

Sand Filters

Purchased Equipment Costs are the sum of the following cost elements:

(1) Pump Costs

(2) Tank Costs

(3) Chemical Feed System Costs

(4) Mixer Costs

(5) Clarifier Costs

(6) Filter Press Costs

(7) Sand Filter Costs

Each cost component includes the cost of freight and associated ancillary equipment such as piping, valves, and 

controllers.

This telephone contact report supports EPA’s development of cost element (7) by documenting EPA's 

communication with a vendor regarding purchase costs for continuous backwash gravity sand filters used in the 

Steam Electric cost model.
Project No.: 0172.08.029.044 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam/Cost/Compliance Modeling

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

 Outgoing Call

Date: 03/21/2011 Time: 11:30 am EST

Company Name: Siemens

 

Contact Name: Miguel Gutierrez

Phone No : (229)-227-8778

Name: Kavya Kasturi ERG

GENERAL SUBJECT: Sand filters costs for chemical precipitation costing

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On Monday, March 21, 2011 Mr. Miguel Gutierrez left me a message to discuss costs of sand filters. At 

11:30am I returned Mr. Guitierrez’s call. He told me he could provide costs for pre-packaged sand filter units 

(referred to as package units) which were essentially steel box units which already contain the sand filter 

material. He stated they can also provide concrete basin units where the client constructs a concrete basin for 

the filter and Siemens just provides the internal material. He said concrete basin units are only applicable for 

ranges over 300 gpm, and the cost of such units would be 30% less than that of the package units.

Mr. Guitierrez provided equipment costs for the flow range previously requested by Rekha Hareendran, which 

was 20 gpm to 700 gpm. While costs are provided for specific flow rates, he stated there is flexibility in the 

units in that they can handle more or less than the specified flow rate. Below are the costs:

• 20 gpm – their smallest unit could handle this flow rate. The cost is $68,000

• 100 gpm - $80,000

• 200 gpm – this is their medium-sized unit. The cost is $98,000

• 300 gpm – this is their largest unit. The cost is $180,000

• 400 gpm, 500 gpm – these flow rates could be handled by 2 medium-sized units. The cost is $196,000

• 600 gpm, 700 gpm – these flow rates could be handled by 2 of the largest units. The cost is $360,000

I told Mr. Guitierrez that we are now looking for costs for an even smaller flow rate of 7 gpm. Mr. Guitierrez 

stated that this flow rate could be handled by their smallest unit and the cost would be the same as what he 

provided for the 20 gpm flow rate.

I asked Mr. Guitierrez to provide any additional specifications, details, and marketing material/brochures for the 

sand filters. He stated he would provide drawings, brochures, and blanket specifications (including diameters, 

heights) via email. He also stated that none of the information above is confidential business information and 

can be shared with anyone.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 20

- 10938 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:19

- cr - 00113

- SCB

- AAS

- 3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus RONY EFREN QUINONES MONTAN O, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ ( March 18, 2021 ) Before JORD AN , GRANT and MARCUS , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-10938 Date Filed: 03/18/2021 Page: 1 of 22 Jose Raf a el Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Rony Quinones Montano in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v . California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, cou nsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Montano ’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED

.

USCA11 Case: 20-10938 Date Filed: 03/18/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.32



CARROLS HOLDINGS CORPORATION



EXTENSION OF STOCK OPTION AWARDS



THIS EXTENSION, dated as of March 1, 2002, is made by and between Carrols Holdings Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (hereinafter called the Company), and Alan Vituli, an employee of Carrols Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Optionee). All capitalized terms herein shall have such meanings as are ascribed to them in the
Plan (as defined below) and in this agreement (the Agreement).



|1. |  | Optionee has previously been granted nonqualifed stock options (the Options) to purchase shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share, of Carrols
Holdings Corporation, under the Carrols Holdings Corporation 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the Plan), the nonqualified stock option agreement(s) related thereto (the Award Agreements) and the
Unvested Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 27, 1997.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to extend the expiration dates of
the options, beyond the dates set forth in the Award Agreements and the Unvested Stock Option Agreement.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. |  | The expiration date for the Options is extended to February 29, 2012.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. |  | All other terms and conditions applicable to the Options as set forth in the Plan, the Award Agreements, and the Unvested Stock Option Agreement remain unmodified.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. |  | The Company acknowledges that Optionee has previously contributed the Options to the Vituli Family Trust for the benefit of his children.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  |  | CARROLS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
| |  |  |  | ----------------------------
|
| |  |  |  |                             
| |  |  |  |                             



Accepted and Agreed to

this 1stday of March, 2002



/S/    ALAN VITULI

---

Alan Vituli
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 857 

To provide for the withdrawal of certain Federal land in Garden Valley, 

Nevada. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2015 

Ms. TITUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the withdrawal of certain Federal land in 

Garden Valley, Nevada. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Garden Valley With5 drawal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GARDEN VALLEY, NEVADA, WITHDRAWAL. 

7 Subject to valid existing rights in existence on the 

8 date of enactment of this Act, the approximately 805,100 

9 acres of Federal land generally depicted on the map entiVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:13 Feb 13, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H857.IH H857

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 857 IH

1 tled ‘‘Garden Valley Withdrawal Area’’ and dated July 11, 

2 2014, is withdrawn from— 

3 (1) entry, appropriation, and disposal under the 

4 public land laws; 

5 (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining 

6 laws; and 

7 (3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral 

8 materials, and geothermal leasing laws. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2016202EN.01007401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/74

---

Article 72

(ex Article 64(1) TEC and ex Article 33 TEU)

(ex Article 64(1) TEC and ex Article 33 TEU)

This Title shall not affect the exercise of the responsibilities incumbent upon Member States with regard to the maintenance of law and order and the safeguarding of internal security.

---
Exhibit
32.6
 
 
 SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION
 OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
 CENTRAL
ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
 (required
by Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)
 
 
 In
connection with the report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004 of Central Illinois Public Service Company (the “Company”) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Form 10-K"), I, Warner L. Baxter, chief financial officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:
March 9, 2005
  ****/s/ Warner L.
  BaxterWarner L. BaxterExecutive Vice President
      andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
  Officer)
152 P.3d 543

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

February 22, 2007

26595

#### State v. Machado

Affirmed
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 205 

Congratulating the administration, staff, students, and alumni of Roosevelt 

University on the occasion of the University’s 70th anniversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2015 

Mr. QUIGLEY (for himself, Mr. RUSH, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. 

GUTIE ́RREZ, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. LIPINSKI, and Mr. 

KINZINGER of Illinois) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the administration, staff, students, and alumni of Roosevelt University on the occasion of the University’s 70th anniversary. 

Whereas, on April 17, 2015, Roosevelt University, located in 

Chicago, Illinois, will celebrate the 70th anniversary of 

the founding of the University on April 17, 1945; 

Whereas Roosevelt University has graduated more than 

95,000 students who have become leaders in their professions and careers, including Chicago’s first African-American mayor, Harold Washington; 

Whereas Roosevelt University was founded at a time when 

most American universities and colleges did not enroll 

large numbers of minority or immigrant students; 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 205 IH 

Whereas Roosevelt University became one of the Nation’s 

first colleges to admit all qualified students, regardless of 

race, religion, or national origin; 

Whereas throughout its history, Roosevelt University has always remained true to the values of inclusiveness, opportunity, and social justice; and 

Whereas today, Roosevelt remains one of the most diverse 

universities in the Midwest: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates the administration, staff, stu3 dents, and alumni of Roosevelt University on the oc4 casion of the University’s 70th anniversary; and 

5 (2) wishes the entire Roosevelt community 

6 many years of continued success in the future. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United States Department of Agriculture

USDA is an equal opportunity employer, provider, and lender.

NOTICE OF PEANUT SALE

FOR RELEASE AT 12:00 P.M. CT February 16, 2022

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of peanuts. The peanuts were 

sold under Peanut Invitation No. 23 dated February 8, 2022.

Catalog 

Lot

Catalog 

Location Purchaser Tons Sold

Bid Price 

(per ton) CCC Revenue Peanut Type

#1 Jonesboro, AR Golden Peanut & Tree Nuts 1,707.08 $ 450.00 $ 768,186.00 Runner 

#2 Jonesboro, AR Golden Peanut & Tree Nuts 1,709.67 $ 450.00 $ 769,351.50 Runner 

#3 Jonesboro, AR Golden Peanut & Tree Nuts 1,707.02 $ 450.00 $ 768,159.00 Runner 

Totals 5,123.77 $ 2,305,696.50
#### JULIA H. MCCONNON *v.*JAMES R. MCCONNON

(AC 19300)

Landau, Schaller and Spear, Js.

Submitted on briefs June 14

officially released July 18, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 24, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 17, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 23 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-65, CP2024-66.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-25901 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE III

ENHANCED COOPERATION

ENHANCED COOPERATION

Article 332

(ex Articles 27a to 27e, 40 to 40b and 43 to 45 TEU and ex Articles 11 and 11a TEC)

(ex Articles 27a

e

b

a

Expenditure resulting from implementation of enhanced cooperation, other than administrative costs entailed for the institutions, shall be borne by the participating Member States, unless all members of the Council, acting unanimously after consulting the European Parliament, decide otherwise.

---
Consent of Independent Auditors




     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
on Form S-8 pertaining to the Chaparral Resources,  Inc. 1989 Stock Warrant Plan
of our report dated March 13,  1998,  except for Note 7, as to which the date is
March 31, 1998,  with respect to the financial  statements  of  Karakuduk-Munay,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the period ended December 31,
1997.


                                                /s/  Ernst & Young
                                                --------------------------------
                                                ERNST & YOUNG



Almaty Kazakhstan
April 1, 1998