alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANCE KARAMOY WENAS et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71776

Agency Nos. A095-302-046

 A095-302-047

 A095-302-048

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 12, 2011** 

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Ance Karamoy Wenas and her family, natives and citizens of Indonesia,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

FILED

JUL 19 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71776

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and

we deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that petitioners have established

extraordinary circumstances to excuse their untimely asylum application. See

8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(D); Toj-Culpatan v. Holder, 612 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th Cir.

2010) (per curiam). Accordingly, petitioners’ asylum claim fails.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that the harassment

Wenas and her family experienced, and the beating of her son, did not rise to the

level of persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir. 2003). 

The record also does not compel the conclusion that petitioners have a clear

probability of future persecution. See Fakhry v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1057, 1065-66

(9th Cir. 2008).

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief

because petitioners failed to establish it is more likely than not that they will be

tortured if returned to Indonesia. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1067-68

(9th Cir. 2009). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12293Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  John Harwick (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 14, 2023 - 12:17pmA remarkable man who recognized the importance of the library and far exceeded limitations of the society. I sincerely wish Mr. Wilkinson and other selfless individuals were as well served as they served their government. Thank you for highlighting such a remarkable man.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb ~tate~ (!Court of §ppeaI~

for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

HENRY E. GOSSAGE,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondent.

2012-3217

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in case no. SF3330110227-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Henry Gossage moves for an extension of time, until

December 10, 2012, to file his initial brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

Case: 12-3217 Document: 4 Page: 1 Filed: 10/05/2012
HENRY GOSSAGE V. LABOR

FOR THE COURT

2

OCT 05 2012

Date

lsI Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Henry E. Gossage (Informal briefform enclosed)

Jeanne E. Davidson, Esq.

s27

Case: 12-3217 Document: 4 Page: 2 Filed: 10/05/2012
#### Kauai Hotel, L.P. v. County of Kauaí

18910

5/16/96

Denied

81 Hawai'i 257, 915 P.2d 1358
EXHIBIT 15

                         ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                  REGARDING INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT
                  ---------------------------------------------



The Board of Directors
LaserSight Incorporated:

With  respect  to the  registration  statements  on  Form  S-8  (nos.  33-96390,
33-52170, 333-16817, 333-16823, 333-62587, 333-62591, 333-84073 and 333-84075)
and on Form S-3 (nos. 333-2198, 333-25237, 333-36655, 333-36837, 333-59369,
333-68495 and 333-77825) of LaserSight Incorporated, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated October 22, 1999 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c)  under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                   /s/KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
November 15, 1999
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply617Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Carol Leo (not... (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 21, 2019 - 7:23amThank you for this inside glimpse at such intricate work that is taking place daily through the efforts of skilled AOC craftsman. Would not have known the many layers in this restoration process.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# EUR-Lex - 22003D0096 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22003D0096

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 96/2003 of 11 July 2003 amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms **

*
Official Journal L 272 , 23/10/2003 P. 0034 - 0034 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 96/2003

of 11 July 2003

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Protocol 31 to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 85/2003 of 20 June 2003(1).

(2) It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the Agreement to include Decision No 451/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Decision No 253/2000/EC establishing the second phase of the Community action programme in the field of education "Socrates"(2),

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in the third indent of Article 4(2c) (Decision No 253/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Protocol 31 to the Agreement:

", as amended by:

- 32003 D 0451: Decision No 451/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 (OJ L 69, 13.3.2003, p. 6)."

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 July 2003, provided that all the notifications in Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(3).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2003.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

H. S. H. Prinz Nikolaus von Liechtenstein

(1) OJ L 257, 9.10.2003, p. 42.

(2) OJ L 69, 13.3.2003, p. 6.

(3) No constitutional requirements indicated.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 810

_____________________________
M ARCUS S ERNARD B LAND , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County

. Timothy Register , Judge

. September 13, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , K ELSEY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tall ahassee
, for Appellee.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE

     The parties hereto agree to amend the lease by and between TAMMY 
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (Landlord) and CHATTEM, INC. (Tenant), for the following 
described space commonly known as approximately 9,6000 square feet located in 
Phase I, SOUTH BROAD STREET CENTER, CHATTANOOGA, TN as follows:

1.   ARTICLE 1, SECTION 1. -PREMISES The square footage of the premises is 
hereby increased to 35,200 square feet.

2.   ARTICLE 2, SECTION 1. -MINIMUM RENT The minimum rent during the remaining 
term of the Lease is hereby modified as follows:

     (i)    Commencing DECEMBER 1, 1996 and terminating JANUARY 31, 1998, an 
            annual rent of ONE HUNDRED THIRTEEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY 
            AND 00/100 ($113,120.00) DOLLARS, payable in equal monthly 
            installments of NINE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY-SIX AND 67/100 
            ($9,426.67) DOLLARS.

     (ii)   Commencing on FEBRUARY 1, 1998 and terminating NOVEMBER 30, 1999, 
            an annual rent of ONE HUNDRED FOURTEEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SIXTY 
            AND 00/100 ($114,560.00) DOLLARS, payable in equal monthly 
            installments of NINE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FORTY-SIX AND 67/100 
            ($9,546.67) DOLLARS.

     (iii)  Commencing DECEMBER 1, 1999 and terminating JANUARY 31, 2001, 
            an annual rent of ONE HUNDRED EIGHTEEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED 
            AND 00/100 ($118,400.00) DOLLARS, payable in equal monthly 
            installments of NINE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SIXTY-SIX AND 67/100 
            ($9,866.67) DOLLARS.

3.   ARTICLE 3, SECTION 1. -REAL ESTATE TAXES AND INSURANCE PREMIUMS The 
Tenant's proportionate share of base year Real Estate Taxes and Insurance 
Premiums will be increased to amounts equal to 70.96 percent (%) of the 1995 
Taxes & Premiums paid by the Landlord for the whole building.

4.   ARTICLE 3, SECTION 2. -PROPORTIONATE SHARE Tenant's proportionate share 
of any increases under Section 1 above shall be deemed to be 70.96 percent (%).

All other terms and conditions contained in the current lease shall remain 
the same.

Date:      12-2-96                               Date:      11/26/96
     -------------------                              -------------------

LANDLORD:                                        TENANT:
TAMMY DEVELOPMENT CO.                            CHATTEM, INC.

By:  Jim Hudson                                  By: Robert E. Bosworth
   -------------------------                        -------------------------

Title:  Partner                                  Title: EVP - CFO
      ----------------------                           ----------------------
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40100 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROLAND CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-99-CR-289-1

-------------------- September 14, 2000 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Roland Castro appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He argues that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) “operates unconstitutionally in a case where the only interstate commerce nexus is the mere fact that the firearms at some point in the past traveled interstate.” He also argues that the evidence adduced at trial gives nearly equal circumstantial support for a theory of guilt as a theory of innocence; therefore, reversal is required. Castro’s timely post-verdict motion for a judgment ofNo. 00-40100 -2- acquittal preserves his right to appellate review of his insufficient-evidence claim. See United States v. Allison , 616 F.2d 779, 783-84 (5th Cir. 1980). We review the district court’s denial of the motion de novo . United States v. Ferguson , 211 F.3d 878, 882 (5th Cir. 2000). “This court has repeatedly emphasized that the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” See United States v. De Leon , 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 120 S. Ct. 156 (1999). Recent decisions by the Supreme Court do not alter this ruling. Moreover, the jury could reasonably find that the black object which fell from Castro’s pocket was the gun that was recovered a short time later. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerry Foster, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was not entitled to a missing witness charge regarding the prosecutor’s failure to call as a witness the confidential informant who arranged and participated in the first sale of cocaine by defendant to an undercover police officer. The People met their burden of proving *1019that the informant’s testimony would be merely cumulative, and there is no evidence in the record that the uncalled witness would have given different testimony *(see, People v Buckler,*39 NY2d 895, 897; *People v Watkins,*67 AD2d 717, 718; *cf., People v Fields,*76 NY2d 761, 763). We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments and find them lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
New York, 1765
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1974

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

The Old City Hall in New York was the meeting place for delegates from nine colonies, who drew up a Declaration of Rights.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. Cox first executed the murals in the eastern north-south corridor, starting work in 1973 and finishing in 1974. This corridor has been termed the Hall of Capitols because it features paintings of 16 different buildings that housed the Continental and United States Congresses from 1754 to 1865. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 3

SECTION 3

THE COUNCIL

Article 243

(ex Article 210 TEC)

(ex Article 210 TEC)

The Council shall determine the salaries, allowances and pensions of the President of the European Council, the President of the Commission, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Members of the Commission, the Presidents, Members and Registrars of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the Secretary-General of the Council. It shall also determine any payment to be made instead of remuneration.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Autocam Corporation (the "Company") for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as delivered on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John C. Kennedy, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

3.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

4.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: November 12, 2004                               /s/ Warren A. Veltman
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                        Warren A. Veltman
                                                       Chief Financial Officer