alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-106500, 333-106493,and 333-88984 on Form S-4 and Registration Statement Nos. 033-64984 and 333-61689 on Form S-3 ofour report dated March 10, 2008 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of a new accounting standard for uncertainty inincome taxes, planned major maintenance activities, and retirement benefits), relating to thefinancial statements and financial statement schedule of Dole Food Company, Inc. appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Dole Food Company, Inc. for the year ended December 29, 2007.Deloitte & Touche LLP
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HomePatient, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen L. Clanton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

This Certification is executed as of August 10, 2005.


                                             /s/ Stephen L. Clanton
                                             --------------------------
                                             Stephen L. Clanton
                                             Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Cybrdi, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-k for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.





3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  March 31, 2011





By:
/s/ Xue BuXue BuTreasurer and COO
#### STATE of Alaska, Appellant, v. Walter Thomas WALLS, Appellee.

No. 4127.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Oct. 26, 1979.

Larry Weeks, Dist. Atty., Daniel W. Hickey, Chief Prosecutor, Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellant.

Anthony M. Sholty, Faulkner, Banfield, Doogan & Holmes, Juneau, for appellee.

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., CONNOR, BOOCHEVER, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The defendant plead guilty to a charge of possession of cocaine in violation of AS 17.10.010. He was sentenced to pay a $5,000 fine, to imprisonment for three years with all but seven days of that period suspended, and was placed on probation for a period of three years. The state appeals on the basis that the sentence imposed is too lenient. We think that in view of the substantial fine imposed the court was not clearly mistaken in imposing the sentence it did.

The state also contends that in determining the proper sentence to be imposed, the court should have considered evidence to the effect that the defendant was attempting to sell the cocaine which he had in his possession. The court refused to do so on the basis that the defendant was charged only with possession and not with attempted sale. In so ruling the court acted within its discretion. *See Szeratics v. State,*572 P.2d 63, 66 (Alaska 1977); *Galaktionoff v. State,*486 P.2d 919, 924 (Alaska 1971). *See also Donlun v. State,*527 P.2d 472, 474 (Alaska 1974). The state’s other evidentiary objection was waived by stipulation below.

AFFIRMED.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Nathanael Greene Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Henry Kirke Brown

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1870

Location
      
Crypt

This statue of Nathanael Greene was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Rhode Island in 1870.

Born in Potowonut (Warwick), Rhode Island, on August 7, 1742, Nathanael Greene showed an early aptitude for mathematics. His academic training was guided by Ezra Stiles, later president of Yale. He did not, however, continue formal education. Instead, he took charge of the family forge at Coventry. Greene became a deputy in the Rhode Island General Assembly from 1770 to 1772, but his greatest interest was the military. When war with Great Britain seemed imminent Greene helped to organize a militia company, the Kentish Guards.

In 1775, the Rhode Island Assembly voted to establish its own militia. Greene became the brigadier in charge of its three regiments. During the same year he was chosen to be a brigadier general in the Continental Army. He saw action at the siege of Boston and remained to command the army of occupation. Greene continued to distinguish himself throughout the Revolution. He was especially helpful to General Washington when the colonial troops were fighting at Trenton. Greene's activities moved south and he became commander of the Army of the South in 1780. On December 14, 1782, he was responsible for the liberation of Charleston, the last British-occupied city in the South.

Greene settled near Savannah after the war and died there on June 19, 1786. Originally interred in the cemetery of Christ Episcopal Church, Savannah, his remains were reinterred in 1902 beneath the Greene Monument in Johnson Square, Savannah. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
HEALTH CARE AND RETIREMENT CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,920
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,688
<PP&E>                                         615,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                  99,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 792,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          146,084
<BONDS>                                        186,471
<COMMON>                                           489
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     381,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   792,485
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               581,117
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  465,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,752
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,328
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 62,561
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,768
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,793
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,793
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.3


 Exhibit 10.3 

VERITONE, INC. 2018 PERFORMANCE-BASED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

PRESIDENT AWARD AGREEMENT 
 Notice is
hereby given of the following Performance Option grant (the “Award”) to purchase shares of the Common Stock of Veritone, Inc. (the “Corporation”) under the Veritone, Inc. 2018 Performance-Based Stock
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”): 
 Participant: Ryan Steelberg 

Grant Date: May 6, 2018 
 Exercise Price:
$21.25 per share 
 Number of Performance Option Shares: 1,357,425 shares of Common Stock 

Schedule Expiration Date: May 6, 2028 
 Type of
Award: Performance Option 
 Exercisability: The Award shall become and remain exercisable as provided in the Plan; provided, however, that the
Award shall not be exercisable prior to the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock owned by Corporation stockholders that are not affiliated with the CEO or the President (the “Minority Stockholders”) in
a fully-informed, non-coerced, and non-waivable vote of the Minority Stockholders. 
 Forfeiture: The Award shall be forfeited as provided in the
Plan. 
 Definitions: All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Award Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan. 

The Participant understands and agrees that the Award is granted subject to and in accordance with the terms of the Plan. The Participant further agrees to be
bound by the terms of the Plan. A copy of the Plan, which is publicly filed, is available upon request made to the Corporate Secretary at the Corporation’s principal offices. This Award Agreement and the Plan constitute the entire contract
between the parties hereto with regard to the subject matter hereof. This Award Agreement is made pursuant to the provisions of the Plan and shall in all respects be construed in conformity with the terms of the Plan. The Participant hereby agrees
to take whatever additional action and execute whatever additional documents the Corporation may deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out or effect one or more of the obligations or restrictions imposed on either the Participant or any
Purchased Shares pursuant to the provisions of the Plan. 
  

					
	VERITONE, INC.	 	


 
					
			
	By: 	 	         /s/ Jeffrey B. Coyne	 	


 
					
	Name:	 	    Jeffrey B. Coyne	 	


 
					
	Title:	 	      EVP and General Counsel	 	


  

					
	 /s/ Ryan Steelberg
	 	
	RYAN STEELBERG
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART ONE

PRINCIPLES

PRINCIPLES

TITLE I

CATEGORIES AND AREAS OF UNION COMPETENCE

CATEGORIES AND AREAS OF UNION COMPETENCE

Article 5

1.   The Member States shall coordinate their economic policies within the Union. To this end, the Council shall adopt measures, in particular broad guidelines for these policies.

Specific provisions shall apply to those Member States whose currency is the euro.

2.   The Union shall take measures to ensure coordination of the employment policies of the Member States, in particular by defining guidelines for these policies.

3.   The Union may take initiatives to ensure coordination of Member States' social policies.

---
JAMES W. HUGGLER, JR.

Board Certified in Criminal Law ATTORNEY AT LAW
Board Certified in Criminal Appellate Law Texas Board of Legal Specialization
April 20, 2015 FILED
Cathy Lusk, Clerk 04/20/2015
Twelfth Court of Appeals
1517 West Front Street, Suite 354 Twelfth Court of Appeals
Tyler, Texas 75702 Cathy Lusk
Clerk

RE: Michael Garza v. State
Appeal Numbers: 12-14-00051-CR and 12-14-00052-CR
Trial Numbers: 002-81506-12 and 002-83977-12

Dear Ms. Lusk,
In accordance with Rule 48.4, I certify that I sent a copy of this Court’s Opinion and Judgments to
Mr. Michael Garza at his last known address and complied with Rule 48.4. I cannot enclose the

return receipt from the postal service because I have not yet received it. If you have any questions,
please feel free to contact me at any time.

Sincerely,

ames Huggler

ce: Michael West

C\data\Corel User Files\Clients\APPEALS Garza, Michael Angel\Court 48-4Letter. wpd

First Place Building ° 100 East Ferguson, Suite 805 ® Tyler,Texas 75702
903-593-2400 © www,jameshugglerlaw.com ¢ Fax 903-593-3830
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CDI Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respect, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



By:

/s/    ROGER H. BALLOURoger H. Ballou President and Chief Executive Officer




Dated:
March 5, 2007



By:

/s/    MARK A. KERSCHNERMark A. Kerschner Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




Dated:
March 5, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to CDI Corp. and will be retained by CDI Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



61
SERVED FEBRUARY 28, 2011 

•'I'nRTMENTOF 

• N-'^PORTATION 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION r!' i 0PERATI0M3 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC :*ni! fPB 7 3 0 2:U3 

IN THE MATTER OF 

RUSHMORE HELICOPTERS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10GL0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FAA No. FAA-2010-0023 

HEARING NOTICE 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on April 27, 28 and 29,2011, inclusive, in the Conference Room, B16, United States 

Courthouse, 515 Ninth Street, Room 244, Rapid City, SD 57701. Hearings will 

commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties should vacate 

the courthouse on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. 

SO ORDERED. 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
1 

i

FAA Docket No. CP10GL0002 

^ (Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVHlfipST 

ORlGi^J^y#^)i^ CiOPY 

^i

Federal Aviation Administration >;.| il* :'••• 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 ^. 

Attention: Hearing Docket Cle^k, ^(|M|| | s 

Wilbur Wright Buil4ii%,|^^^»1000^ 

ONE^iaSiPY 

Michael Jacob, Respondent 

President or CEO 

Rushmore Helicopters, Inc. 

24564 Highway 16/385 

Custer, SD 57730 

Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

TEL: 847-294-7713 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwfn*. 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Roonl E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

-^ 202-366-5121 Legal Assistent 

FAX:~^ 202-366-7536 

rf;ij.,»?*J 

veLaw Judge 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention 

courier, use the follomog address: 

& , Wilbur Wright Buil|l%--Suite 

Cleric, AGC-430.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0129. DEIVI POLANO v. PATRICIA RODRIGUEZ.

Deivi Polano filed this appeal fromthe superior court’sfinal decree of divorce. 

The Supreme Court, however, has general appellate jurisdiction over divorce and

alimony cases. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (6). Accordingly,

this application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/22/2015

September 22, 2015
#### Seldon R. GLENN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Collection District of Kentucky, Petitioner, v. George O. BOOMER, Respondent.

No. 8031.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 12, 1939.

Eli H. Brown, III, of Louisville, Ky., and Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Sewall Key, and Berryman Green, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

E. J. Wells, of Louisville, Ky., for appellee.

Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and ARANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause being called for argument, came the petitioner by counsel and on his motion it is now ordered that this appeal, 21 F.Supp. 766, be and the same is dismissed, on the ground that under the Public Salary Tax Act of 1939, 53 Stat. 574, this case has become moot.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6749** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JOSEPH H. HARRIS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:06

- cr - 00163

- REP

- 1; 3:13

- cv - 00768

- REP )

Submitted : September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Joseph H. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph H. Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s order s dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as an unauthorized, successive motion, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment. The order s are not appealable u nless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 )
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harris has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED