alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW, FILED AS PART OF
ALTEON'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000878903
<NAME> ALTEON INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      11,996,236
<SECURITIES>                                 2,826,714
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,319,163
<PP&E>                                       2,656,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,246,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,080,612
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         32
<COMMON>                                       190,099
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,975,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,246,179
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               505,211
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,177,478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,672,267)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,672,267)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,672,267)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

                       CAPITAL INVESTMENT OF HAWAII, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                 Subsidiaries of
                       Capital Investment of Hawaii, Inc.

        The Registrant, Capital Investment of Hawaii, Inc., has no parent. The
Registrant has the following subsidiaries, all of which are included in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. All companies are wholly owned
subsidiaries of the Registrant except for Makaha Valley, Incorporated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   STATE OF
              NAME                                              INCORPORATION
------------------------------------------------------         ----------------
<S>                                                            <C>
Latipac Fine Foods, Incorporated                                    Hawaii
Latipac Mortgage Company, Limited and its wholly owned              Hawaii
   subsidiary - Latipac, Limited                                  California
Latipac Nevada, Limited                                             Nevada
Makaha Valley, Incorporated (85.8% - owned)                         Hawaii
Resources, Incorporated                                             Hawaii
</TABLE>

                                       18
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 21, 2015

Order 

April 21, 2015

151105(72)

SUSAN FRITZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

SANDY PINES WILDERNESS TRAILS, and 

MAX GIBBS,

Defendants-Appellees.

SC: 151105

COA: 317144

Allegan CC: 10-046887-CZ

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to extend the time 

for filing her reply brief on the application is GRANTED. The reply brief will be 

accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before April 27, 2015.
HOPPER AND KANOUFF, P.C.
                         1610 Wynkoop Street, Suite 200
                           Denver, Colorado 80202-1196
                                 (303) 892-6000



                                 March 14, 1996




OFIS Filer Support
SEC Operations Center
6432 General Green Way
Alexandria Virginia 22312-2413

                  Re:  Chaparral Resources, Inc.
                          Annual Report on Form 10-K405

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Enclosed  pursuant  to Rule 901(d) of  Regulation  S-T is a copy of the
Annual Report on Form 10-K405 of Chaparral Resources,  Inc., which we are filing
through EDGAR.

         The fee has been paid on March 13, 1996 to:

                            Mellon Bank
                            Account No. 9108739/RE
                            Reference 1401

                                                     Sincerely,


                                                     /s/ Alan W. Peryam
                                                     Alan W. Peryam

TSS:blk
Enc.
cc:      Chaparral Resources, Inc.
         Grant Thornton LLP
Exhibit 11.1

WIRELESS TELECOM GROUP, INC.COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS(Unaudited)

|                                         |  | For the Three Months
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|                                         |  | Ended March 31,     
|                                         |  | 2008                
|                                         |  |                     
|Net Income (Loss)                        |  | $                   
|BASIC EARNINGS:                          |  |                     
|Weighted average number of common shares |  |                     
|outstanding                              |  |                     
|Basic earnings (loss) per common share   |  | $                   
|DILUTED EARNINGS:                        |  |                     
|Weighted average number of common shares |  |                     
|outstanding                              |  |                     
|Assumed exercise of stock options        |  |                     
|Weighted average number of common shares |  |                     
|outstanding, as adjusted                 |  |                     
|Diluted earnings (loss) per common share |  | $                   

---
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply11783Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Tammy Boyd (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 9, 2022 - 12:21pmDennis, thank you for STANDING STRONG and sharing your story. May your story help others to overcome their own pain. Thank you again Buddy for sharing.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### McEWEN IRRIGATION COMPANY, aka McEwem Ditch Company, a Utah Corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Normand MICHAUD aka Normand P. Michaud aka Bud N. Michaud, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 14601.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Dec. 13, 1976.

*607Robert L. Gardner, Cedar City, for defendant and appellant.

David L. Mower, Panguitch, for plaintiff and respondent.

ELLETT, Justice:

This is an appeal from an order of the court commanding the defendant to remove a bridge from across plaintiff’s ditch traversing defendant’s land. The following sequence of events gave the defendant his grounds for appeal:

The sheriff had a Complaint, Summons, and Order to Show Cause in his possession on April 29, 1976. He went to defendant’s place and served the Summons, together with a copy of the Complaint, upon defendant’s aged mother who lived in one of two trailer homes on defendant’s land. The Order to Show Cause (why the bridge should not be removed) was not served. The return date for the order was May 6, 1976, just seven days after the Summons was served.

Defendant contacted an attorney on May 4, 1976, who called the attorney for the plaintiff and the two thought they had worked out a compromise. They agreed to meet May 6th and have an order signed by the judge settling the matter.

May 6th was the regular court day in that rural county. The plaintiff rejected defendant’s proposed settlement and the judge called the matter for disposition. Defendant’s counsel pointed out to the court that since the order was never served, the court lacked jurisdiction to proceed. However, when the court learned that the defendant was in the courthouse — not in the courtroom, he ordered the hearing to proceed. Counsel for defendant said he was not prepared for the hearing — that he had only appeared thinking to settle the matter on terms heretofore agreed to. The court ordered him to remain in the courtroom and participate or not as he thought best, and stated that the matter would be heard. It was heard ex parte and the court ordered the bridge to be removed.

The Summons purportedly served upon the defendant gave him twenty days in which to answer the allegations of the Complaint; and when the hearing was had, only seven of those days had elapsed. The order, itself, had not been served on the defendant at that time. There was nothing before the court and the purported order was a nullity.1

The order made is set aside, and the case is remanded for such further proceedings as may be proper. Costs are awarded to the appellant.

HENRIOD, C. J., and MAUGHAN, CROCKETT and WILKINS, JJ., concur.

1

. Rule 6(d), U.R.C.P., provides that an order such as the one before the court “shall be • served not later than 5 days before the time specifled for the hearing” unless otherwise ordered by the court. No such time was otherwise ordered by the court.
William Paul Trial, et 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 16, 2015

No. 04-14-00521-CV

MEDINA INTERESTS, LTD,

Appellant

v.

William Paul TRIAL, et al.,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-04-00098-CVK

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant’s unopposed Motion for Continuance of Oral Argument is GRANTED, and the 

current submission date of May 13, 2015 is hereby WITHDRAWN.

The above cause has been re-set for formal submission and oral argument before this 

court on Thursday, May 21, 2015, 9:00 a.m, before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Marion, 

Justice Martinez, and Justice Chapa.

Argument is limited to twenty (20) minutes each side with ten (10) minutes rebuttal. 

PER CURIAM

Attested to: _____________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**SOLOMON JOHNSON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 159 MM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 8th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Le ave to File Petition** 

**for Allowance of Appeal** Nunc Pro Tunc **is** DENIED

**.**
EXHIBIT  99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFG Investment Trust B (the "Trust"),
on  Form  10-Q  for  the  period  ended  September  30,  2002  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  the  Principal  Executive Officer of the Trust's Managing Trustee,
hereby  certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:
(1)     the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and
(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of the Trust.

                    /s/  Gary  D.  Engle
                    --------------------
                    Gary  D.  Engle
President  of  AFG  ASIT  Corporation,
 the  Managing  Trustee  of  the  Trust
(Principal  Executive  Officer)
November  14,  2002
Transitional Product Recommendation

§ 205.2 Terms defined. 

Transition. The act of establishing organic management practices in accordance with the Act and 

the regulations in this part.

Transition period. The time between the start of organic management and when an operation or 

portion of an operation is eligible for organic certification.

Transitional product. A product from an operation or portion of an operation which has completed 

one or more years of the transition period towards becoming a certified organic operation and is 

certified by an accredited certifying agent as operating in accordance with the Act and the 

regulations in the part.

§ 205.104 Use of the term "transitional."

(a) Products of farms in transition to organic certification may be labeled or represented as 

"certified transitional " or "transitional" after the operation has been certified by an accredited 

certifying agent as operating in compliance with the requirements in this part.

(b) In order to market products as "certified transitional" or "transitional" an operation must 

maintain records as set forth in § 205.103 and develop an organic production plan as set forth in 

§ 205.201.

(c) Annual inspections are required with at least one inspection occurring prior to harvest of 

transitional crops in order for the crops to be labeled or represented as "certified transitional" or 

"transitional".

(d) Transitional status may only be granted to an operation or portion of an operation where the 

applicant can provide evidence of:

(1) At least 12 months active organic management prior to harvest; or

(2) Twelve (12) months with no application of prohibited materials prior to planting and organic 

management of any area of the farm that is or will be used for transitional crop production.

(e) "Transitional" and "certified transitional" products must not:

(1) Be labeled or represented as "organic" or "transition to organic";

(2) Be used as organic ingredients in the formulation of products labeled as "100% organic," 

"organic," or "made with organic (specified ingredients or food group(s))";

(3) Use the USDA organic seal; or

(4) Use the seal of a certifying agent, unless that seal is specifically designed for transitional 

products and is clearly distinguishable from the certifying agent’s seal used on organic products.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS                   1-MO
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,423,000                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,000                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,587,000                       0
<PP&E>                                      19,935,000                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,000                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,519,000                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          231,000                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,500,000                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     4,971,000                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,607,000                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,519,000                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               421,000                   5,000
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,661,000                 118,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               851,000                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             298,000                  17,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,389,000)               (130,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,389,000)               (130,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (214,000)                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,603,000)               (130,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)                       0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.9


  


Amendment
No. 1 TO


 


SECURED
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


This Amendment No.
1 to Secured Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is effective this November 17, 2016, by and among Carl
Berg (the “Lender”) and Summit Semiconductor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”).
The Company issued that certain Secured Promissory Note dated April 1, 2015 to Lender having a principal balance of $450,000.00
(the “Note”). For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
Lender and Company agree to amend the Note as follows:


 


1.       The
“Maturity Date” of the Note shall be June 1, 2017.


 


2.       In
the event that the Company completes an underwritten public offering of its Common Units (or an equivalent thereof) or consummates
a Change of Control during the term of the Note, the then aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Note (and accrued and unpaid
interest thereon) shall be converted, automatically and without any further action on the part of the Lender, the Company or any
other person, into that number of Common Units (or an equivalent thereof) as is equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (i)
the aggregate principal amount of the Note (and accrued and unpaid interest thereon) by (ii) the Conversion Price. “Conversion
Price” shall mean the lesser of (A) (i) $0.30 or (B) (i) the highest price per Common Unit (or an equivalent thereof) sold
in the Company’s initial public offering or paid by a buyer in connection with a Change of Control, multiplied by (ii) 75%.
“Change of Control” shall mean (i) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with or into another
entity or (ii) the bone fide sale of substantially all the Company’s assets. The foregoing notwithstanding, a merger
or consolidation of the Company shall not constitute a “Change in Control” if immediately after such merger or consolidation
a majority of the voting power of the capital stock of the continuing or surviving entity, or any direct or indirect parent corporation
of such continuing or surviving entity, will be owned by the persons who were the Company’s unit holders immediately prior
to such merger or consolidation in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the voting power of the Company’s
units immediately prior to such merger or consolidation.


 


3.       Except
as expressly amended hereby, the terms of the Note as originally constituted remain in full force and effect.


 


4.       This
Amendment and all actions arising out of or in connection with this Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Oregon, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions of the State of Oregon, or of any other
state.


 


5.       This
Amendment may be executed and delivered electronically and in counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall
be deemed an original, and such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument.


 




    	 



    	 



    

 





	LENDER:  	COMPANY:
	 	 
	CARL BERG	Summit semiconductor, llc


 


	 	 	 	By:	 
	By: 	 	 	Name:	 
	 	 	 	Title:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus II
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003
(the "Report"), I, Sam P. Douglass, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                 /s/ Sam P. Douglass
Dated: May 15, 2003                              -------------------------------
                                                 Sam P. Douglass
                                                 Chairman
                                                 Chief Executive Officer