alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00874-CV

Juan Alberto CASTILLO and Ana L. Perez,

Appellants

v.

COMPASS BANK,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CVD-000024-L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2015

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On September 23, 2014, appellants Juan Alberto Castillo and Ana L. Perez filed separate 

notices of appeal from the trial court’s August 27, 2014 judgment. On December 15, 2014, 

appellants filed separate affidavits of indigency in this court. By order dated January 20, 2015, we 

construed the affidavits as motions for extension of time to file the affidavits in the trial court and 

granted the motions. See Higgins v. Randall County Sheriff’s Office, 257 S.W.3d 684 (Tex. 2008). 

In that same order, we ordered the clerk of this court to send copies of the affidavits and our order 

to the district clerk, the court reporter, and all parties. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(d)(2). We further 
04-14-00874-CV

ordered that anyone who desired to file a contest to the affidavits to file such contests in this court 

on or before January 30, 2015. No contests were filed. Because no contests were filed, appellants 

were considered indigent for purposes of this appeal. Both the clerk’s record and the reporter’s 

record had been filed in this court. Accordingly, we ordered appellants to file their appellants’ 

briefs in this court on or before January 13, 2015. Neither appellant filed a brief. 

Based on the foregoing, on March 20, 2015, we ordered appellant Juan Alberto Castillo 

and appellant Ana L. Perez to file his and her briefs and written responses reasonably explaining 

their failures to timely file their briefs in this court on or before March 30, 2015. We advised 

appellants that if they failed to file their briefs and written responses as ordered, we would dismiss 

their appeals for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Neither appellant has filed a 

brief or the written response as ordered by the court.

We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. We further order that 

appellee, Compass Bank, recover its costs in this appeal from appellants Juan Alberto Castillo and 

Ana L. Perez. 

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-69,315-03
IN RE BRANDON CR OCKER, R elator
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 241-0571-20-B IN THE 241 DISTRICT COURT ST F ROM SMITH COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this Court’s orig inal jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Smit h County

and his applica tion has not been prope rly forwa rded to this Court. Respondent, the District Clerk of Smit h County , shall forwa rd Relator’s habea s application to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habea s application in Smit h County , or forwa rd a copy of an order desig nating issues toge ther with corr espondenc e documenting the date the State
rec eived Relator’s habea s application. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(c) and (d); T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply with this order within thirty

day s from the da

te of this order
.2

Filed: Oc tober 5, 2022 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 31

           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 OF THE
      SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory Ofiesh, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB of  Franklin  Lake
Resources Inc.:

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or cause such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
     including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
     within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
     quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
     of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


Dated:  March 16, 2004

                                               By: /s/  Fr. Gregory Ofiesh
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Fr. Gregory Ofiesh
                                               President and CEO
                                               Acting Chief Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 21994A0103(03) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 21994A0103(03)

**Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 2 on products excluded from the scope of the Agreement in accordance with Article 8 (3) (a) **

*
Official Journal L 001 , 03/01/1994 P. 0039 - 0039 *

PROTOCOL 2

on products excluded from the scope of the Agreement in accordance with Article 8(3)(a)

The following products falling within HS, Chapters 25 to 97, are excluded from the scope of the Agreement:

>TABLE>
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 21, 2015

Order 

April 21, 2015

150364(95)

HELEN YONO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 150364

COA: 308968

Ct of Claims: 11-000117-MD

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan County Road 

Commission Self-Insurance Pool and the County Road Association of Michigan to 

participate as amici curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on April 8, 2015, 

is accepted for filing.
Exhibit 99 (g)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy L. Denecky, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







Date:  March 10, 2003

By  /s/ Randy L. Denecky

Randy L. Denecky

President, Treasurer and Chief

Financial and Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. and will be retained by Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 November 9, 2006
    /s/ John R. Eckel, Jr.John R. Eckel, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,754,601               4,953,046
<SECURITIES>                                 5,712,454               3,769,564
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,388,162                 791,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    691,939                 659,739
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,547,233              11,323,123
<PP&E>                                      49,975,628              47,152,131
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,119,307               8,987,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,771,003              59,059,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,933,361              18,797,446
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,912                     532
<COMMON>                                       267,702                 473,590
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,477,278              28,775,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,771,003              59,059,321
<SALES>                                     11,223,260              22,335,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,223,260              22,335,960
<CGS>                                        8,120,345              15,343,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,875,471              35,985,221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                 322,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,550,317)            (13,879,458)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,550,317)            (13,879,458)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (944,330)                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0             (1,276,952)
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,217,508            (15,156,410)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)                  (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)                  (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1IEA Income Fund XII, L.P.Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income Fund XII, L.P. (the“Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006   /s/ DENNIS J TIETZ   Dennis J Tietz
#### Kenneth Loughry, Respondent, v Citibank (New York State) et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 1.)

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Boehm, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J.—Discovery.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Lawton, Lowery and Davis, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 879 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 879

To repeal the ``Cadillac Tax'' on middle class Americans' health plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2015

  Mr. Guinta introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the ``Cadillac Tax'' on middle class Americans' health plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ax the Tax on Middle Class 
Americans' Health Plans Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE TAX ON EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUMS AND 
              HEALTH PLAN BENEFITS AND RELATED REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Excise Tax.--Chapter 43 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking section 4980I.
    (b) Reporting Requirement.--Section 6051(a) of such Code is amended 
by inserting ``and'' at the end of paragraph (12), by striking ``, 
and'' at the end of paragraph (13) and inserting a period, and by 
striking paragraph (14).
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 43 of 
such Code is amended by striking the item relating to section 4980I.
    (d) Effective Dates.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided by paragraph (2), the 
        amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years 
        beginning after December 31, 2017.
            (2) Reporting requirement.--The amendment made by 
        subsection (b) shall apply to calendar years beginning after 
        December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40436 

Summary Calendar

 

ANDREW WALKER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM A HALTER, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:98-CV-75

--------------------

March 13, 2001

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Andrew Walker (“Walker”) appeals from the district court’s

judgment affirming the denial of his application for disability

insurance benefits. He argues (1) that the administrative law

judge’s (“ALJ”) determination that he possessed the residual

functional capacity (“RFC”) to perform light work is not

supported by substantial evidence; (2) that the ALJ improperly

relied on determinations that he was noncompliant in his medical

regimen and he was a cocaine-user; and (3) that the ALJ failed to
No. 00-40436 

-2-

give adequate weight to the opinions of treating physicians, Dr.

Stan Griffin and Dr. M. E. Sutherland.

The ALJ’s determination that Walker could perform his past

relevant work as a corrections officer is supported by

substantial evidence. The ALJ considered Walker’s RFC to perform

light work, as limited by certain circumstances, and considered

the demands of the past relevant work. See Jones v. Bowen, 829

F.2d 524, 527 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1987). “[A]dministrative law

judges must consider findings of State agency medical . . .

consultants as opinion evidence.” See 20 C.F.R.

§ 404.1527(f)(2)(i). The July 9, 1992, and August 7, 1995,

opinions of state agency medical consultants support the ALJ’s

determination.

This court will not consider Walker’s arguments that the ALJ

improperly relied on determinations that he was noncompliant in

his medical regimen and he was a cocaine-user because he did not

make these arguments in the district court. See Chaparro v.

Bowen, 815 F.2d 1008, 1011 (5th Cir. 1987); James v. Bowen, 793

F.2d 702, 704 (5th Cir. 1986).

The ALJ’s decision to give little or no weight to the

opinions of Dr. Griffin and Dr. Sutherland is supported by

substantial evidence because the opinions are relatively

unsupported when considered in conjunction with the opinions

Walker’s treating physician, Dr. John F. Cramer. See Leggett v.

Chater, 67 F.3d 558, 566 (5th Cir. 1995).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Doe Children, In re

24712

06/05/2003

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      11,312,017
<SECURITIES>                                   156,616
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,438,905
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,858,142
<PP&E>                                      93,648,991
<DEPRECIATION>                            (39,839,389)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,569,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,094,903
<BONDS>                                     24,444,535
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,029,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,569,325
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,406,379
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,069,851
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,023,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,313,482
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,313,482
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,313,482
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
June 19, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor

Washington, DC 20590-0001

Re: Amendment to Exemption NO. 11625 Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0551

Dear Sir or Madam:

DARTdrones, LLC (DARTdrones) was issued an Exemption numbered 11625 dated 19 May

2015. DARTdrones herby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow additional models 

of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the exemption.

DARTdrones seeks to operate additional DJI products that include all Phantom quadcopters and 

any subsequent model of Phantom to include but not limited to the Phantom 3. DARTdrones 

wishes to operate the DJI Inspire 1 and any subsequent model developed by DJI under the 

Inspire product line. DARTdrones seeks to operate the S800, S900, and S1000 and any 

subsequent model developed by DJI under the Spreading Wing product line. 

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking only for the addition of similar

unmanned aerial systems, which have been previously approved under other exemptions, there 

has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were 

the basis for granting the original exemption. DARTdrones respectfully submits that good cause 

exists so that the notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested 

amendment.

Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions concerning this request for an

amendment to the Exemption.

Respectfully submitted,

By: //////s//////

Christopher Costello

Chief Flight Instructor

DARTdrones, LLC

(215) 350-0137

chrisc@dartdrones.com