alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

FERDINAND ONIA MATI, Jr., 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-50093 

D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00410-JLS-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 19, 2019**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 

Ferdinand Onia Mati, Jr., appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 13-month sentence and several conditions of supervised release 

imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy, in violation of 18 

U.S.C. § 371. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm, in 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 22 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-50093 

part, and remand with instructions.

Mati first contends that the district court failed to consider his mitigating 

arguments. We review this procedural argument for plain error, see United States 

v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude that 

there is none. It is clear from the record that the district court considered Mati’s

written submissions, the arguments he made at the sentencing hearing, and the 

facts detailed in the presentence investigation report, but was not persuaded that 

they warranted a lower sentence.

Furthermore, the district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing a 

within-Guidelines 13-month sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 

(2007). Contrary to Mati’s contention that the sentence does not reflect adequately 

his mitigating arguments or the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities, 

the sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) 

sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51.

Finally, Mati challenges the standard supervised release conditions 5, 6, and 

14. As the government concedes, those standard supervised release conditions are 

unconstitutionally vague. See United States v. Evans, 883 F.3d 1154, 1162-64 (9th 

Cir.), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 133 (2018). We remand for the district court to 

modify the conditions consistent with our opinion in Evans. 

AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED with instructions.
July 31, 2001

23553

#### Bullard v. Administrative Director of Courts

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF INCOME, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000762129
<NAME> CILCORP INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      862,579
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    171,214
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         179,541
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        47,636
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 569,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,830,953
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      468,833
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              (745)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 468,088
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           22,000
<PREFERRED>                                     44,120
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           730,434
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              45,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  46,900
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   30,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      1,183
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   520
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 442,708
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,830,953
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      605,093
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             (199)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     564,461
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     564,262
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         40,831
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (1,037)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  39,794
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        37,051
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,743
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      3,208
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    (465)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        29,813
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       30,530
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          44,122
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Engelking v. Hawaiian Elec. Co., Inc.

23334

05/29/2003

Vacated and remanded
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Hammurabi, Relief Portrait
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Thomas Hudson Jones

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1950

Location
      
House Chamber

Hammurabi (fl. c. 1792-1750 B.C.) King of Babylonia. Author of the Code of Hammurabi, which is recognized in legal literature as one of the earliest surviving legal codes.

The 23 marble relief portraits over the gallery doors of the House Chamber in the U.S. Capitol depict historical figures noted for their work in establishing the principles that underlie American law. They were installed when the chamber was remodeled in 1949-1950. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
October 10, 1996

17006

#### State v. Williams

Order No. 96-16

Affirmed in part, reversed in part
# C_2016202EN.01015301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/153 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/153

---

Article 237

(ex Article 204 TEC)

(ex Article 204 TEC)

The Council shall meet when convened by its President on his own initiative or at the request of one of its Members or of the Commission.

---
#### Magsanide; In re

17671

6/24/94

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply591Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Chris D (not v... (not verified)PermalinkMarch 7, 2018 - 6:36amMarty,_x000D_ _x000D_ Great piece, very cool now knowing the what and why of building fenestration ornamenting._x000D_ _x000D_ Keep the articles coming, always a captive audience._x000D_ _x000D_ Chris
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 22, 2015

jam

Order 

Clerk

April 22, 2015

151363 (65)

ANTHONY CLIFFORD GATES, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 151363

COA: 317939

MICHAEL BRUBAKER, 

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $45.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$330.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Access Denied
This page's content has either been moved or is only for users on the Capitol Network.
        
                  Image
    Example of the type of hardware used in the early U.S. Capitol: rim lock from a Capitol door.

Example of the type of hardware used in the early U.S. Capitol: rim lock from a Capitol door.Please connect to the network if you have access and refresh this page.

If you've discovered a broken link please let us know. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

October 22, 2010

Mr. Jonathan Day

Andrews Kurth LLP

111 Congress Ave., Suite 1700

Austin, TX 78701

Ms. Elizabeth R. B. Sterling

Envtl. Prot. & Admin. Law Div.

Office of the Attorney General

P. O. Box 12548

Austin, TX 78711-2548

Mr. Thomas Lane Brocato

Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C.

816 Congress Ave., Suite 1900

Austin, TX 78701

Mr. Ron H. Moss

Graves Dougherty Hearon & Moody, PC

P.O. Box 98

Austin, TX 78767-0098

RE:Case Number:  08-0727

Court of Appeals Number:  03-06-00285-CV

Trial Court Number:  GN503381

Style:TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS

v.

CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC; PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@courts.state.tx.us or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 08-0727Page 2**
Inthe Matter of 

## United States ofAmerica DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

# RECEIVED JUL 1 52013 

## i=H!ARING DOCKET

SouthwestAirlines Co. ) ) ) ) ) FAA Case No. 2010SW290189 Docket CP No.- To Be Assigned FDMS No. FAA 2013-0050 Judge Richard C. Goodwin

WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FORHEARING COMES NOW Respondent SouthwestAirlines Co., through counsel, and pursuant to 14 CFR Section 13.215 hereby withdraws its Request for Hearing and its Answer in FAA Case No. 2010SW290189.

Dated: July 12,2013
Respectfully submitted,

Dane B. Jaques, Esq. McKennaLong & Aldridge LLP 1676 International Drive, Penthouse McLean, VA 22102 (703) 336-8800 djaques@mckennalong.com Counsel for Respondent SouthwestAirlines Co.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certifY that I have this day served a copy ofthe foregoing Withdrawal of Request for Hearing on the following party's counsel or designated representative, at the address indicated, by UPS overnight delivery: Yolanda AyalaBernal, ASW-7E2 Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Region 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort Worth, TX 76137 Fax: 817-222-5945 or 5092
I also certify that I have this day served the original and one copy ofthe foregoing Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing onthe following, at the address indicated, by UPS overnight delivery: Hearing Docket Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, S.W. Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Fax:202-493-5142
I also certifY that I have this day served a copy ofthe foregoing Withdrawal of Request for Hearing onthe following, at the address indicated, byUPS overnight delivery: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590

Datedthis 12th day ofJuly, 2013. Fax: 202-366-7536**Ja~** s A. Eastwood M ennaLong & Aldridge LLP 1676 International Drive, Penthouse McLean, VA 22102

2 Tel: 703-336-8800 Fax: 703-336-8750
Exhibit 32.1

       Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                 of Title 18 of the United States Code


I, Joseph F. Kruy, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
Cambex Corporation, certify that

(i) This annual report on Form 10KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(ii) The information contained in this annual report on Form 10KSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Cambex Corporation.


Dated: March 30, 2005        /s/ Joseph F. Kruy
                             Joseph F. Kruy
                             President and Treasurer
                             [principal executive officer and
                              principal financial officer]


This certification accompanies this annual report pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE IV

SOLIDARITY

SOLIDARITY

Article 38

Consumer protection

Union policies shall ensure a high level of consumer protection.

---
Exhibit (10)(ix)



November 9, 2004



Ms. Judy Sonnett

2225 Tremont Road

Columbus, OH 43221



Dear Judy,



It is a pleasure to
confirm the details of your part time role and compensation package that was discussed with you.



As you move to a role more focused on people and organizational development your job title will be Director of Organizational Development reporting to the new VP Human Resources. It is expected that you will work
25 to 30 hours per week and commensurate with this change in role and schedule, your base salary will be adjusted to $175,000. You will continue to receive normal salary reviews during the March IMPACT cycle.



You will continue to participate in the 2005 Management Incentive Program with a 30%
target. With this salary change, your 2005 target will be $52,500. Your actual payment will be in accordance with overall Borden Chemical financial performance and the terms of the plan.



You received a perquisite payment as the Vice President of Human Resources and
participation in that program will remain with the position and the new person will participate in the perquisite program.



In accordance with the letter you received in May 2004, you will be provided with 12 months of severance if the company terminates your employment without cause.
Should you voluntarily resign, you will forfeit this payment.



I am
pleased that you will remain a key contributor to Borden Chemical and I am confident you will continue to make significant contributions to help build a stronger business in the years to come.



Please acknowledge receipt and acceptance of this offer by signing and dating, and then
returning the original of this letter to me. If you have questions please feel free to contact me in the office or at home.



|          |  |                  |  |                         |  |        
|--------- |  | ---------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | -------
|          |  |                  |  | Sincerely,             
|          |  |                 
|          |  |                  |  | Craig Morrison         
|          |  |                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|          |  |                  | 
|Accepted: |  | /s/ Judy Sonnett |  | Date:                   |  | 2/19/05
|          |  | Judy Sonnett     |  |                         |  |
NO. 07-03-0056-CR

 07-03-0057-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

JULY 15, 2004

______________________________

SEAN KELLY FOSTER A/K/A SEAN KELLY JOSEPH;

JOSEPH SEAN FOSTER, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY;

NO. 78161, 85290; HONORABLE CHARLES D. CARVER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant and his

attorney both have signed the document stating that appellant withdraws his appeal. Tex. R. App.

P. 42.2(a). No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

James T. Campbell

 Justice

Do not publish.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 81423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25847]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting of the 
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; Brain Initiative RFA (EB-22-
003) Review SEP.
    Date: February 2, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, Suite 920, 
6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Yoon-Young Jang, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-3397, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b322424256632243e252c65212a252c0b252223652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff86909091d286908a9198d1959e9198bf919697d1989089">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, 
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 
National Institutes of Health.)

    Dated: November 16, 2023.
Patricia B. Hansberger,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-25847 Filed 11-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>