alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of H. Bogart Seaman, County Treasurer, as Administrator of the Estate of Isabelle Fowlkes, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

June 18, 1959.

*John*L. *Molloy*for petitioner.

*I. Arnold Ross*for attorney in fact, objector.

John D. Bennett, S.

A proposed decree and a counter decree have been submitted in this accounting and objection is made to a provision in the counter decree for payment of $65 for stenographic minutes of the hearing of January 5, 1959.

The objector quotes section 299 of the Judiciary Law but makes no mention of section 30 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, which provides a definite fee for the writing out of stenographic notes of testimony in any proceeding for the record of the Surrogate’s Court and permitting the Surrogate to order that the fee for such record copy be paid out of the estate to which the proceeding relates. Under this provision this court has charged the expense of the record copy to the estate herein. The inclusion of this payment is proper and the objection is overruled.

There have been a number of occasions recently where payment for the record copy has been questioned and this court desires to set forth its policy concerning the same. At hearings held before this court, attorneys frequently present considerable *461testimony on matters with which they are familiar hut which are new to the court. It is impossible to remember the details of such testimony with sufficient exactness to render a just and complete decision. The court requires a record copy of such testimony to refresh its recollection.

The court is recognizant of the cost of minutes and has attempted to co-operate with counsel in every way possible to reduce this expense. Where a record copy of minutes is obtained, the court has always made the same available to all the attorneys in the proceeding for use in preparing any memoranda or papers for the court. The court is also willing to forego an additional record copy where an attorney secures a copy of the minutes for his own use and then files the same with his memorandum or other papers as part of the record.

However, where as in this case it is necessary for the court to secure a record copy of the minutes, the court will charge the same to the estate to which the proceeding relates unless, for some special reason, such charge would be improper or inequitable.

The decree in this accounting will be signed with the direction for payment to the stenographer included therein.
July 2018

The Pilot Project for the Procurement of 

Unprocessed Fruits and Vegetables

Traceability Requirements 

All vendors participating under the USDA Pilot Project for the procurement of unprocessed 

fruits and vegetables who indicate they handle fresh fruit and vegetable products originating 

from sources other than the United States, its territories or possessions, the common wealth of 

Puerto Rico, or the Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands must undergo a traceability review.

Vendors must provide the Domestic Origin Certification (attachment C, Eligible Vendor 

Requirements) to the representative of the USDA Agricultural Marketing Services, Specialty 

Crop Inspection for review. The review will be based on sales volume, and the traceback 

required. 

• The number of reviews required will be based on sales volume.

• The number of tracebacks required per review will be determined based on the 

following sampling criteria contained in the American National Standards 

Institute/American Society of Quality Publication Z1.4, “Sampling Procedures and Tables 

for Inspection by Attributes”:

o Each review will consist of an examination of invoices submitted by the vendor 

for review. The sample units shall be an invoice (per commodity). The inspection 

level shall be S-2 and the acceptable quality level (AQL), expressed in terms of 

failures per hundred units, shall be 1.5. 

Vendors who fail a traceability review must complete a corrective action report (CAR) and are 

subject to quarterly rather than annual traceability reviews for one full year, using the same 

procedure outlined above. All traceability reviews conducted will be at the vendor’s expense.

Traceability reviews for vendors that do not import produce from sources outside of the United 

States, its territories or possessions, or Puerto Rico, as indicated on their Domestic Origin 

Certification form, will be performed annually. 

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Agricultural Marketing Service, Commodity 

Procurement Staff 1400 Independence Ave., 

SW, Room 3522-S, STOP 0239 Washington, 

DC 20250-0239

Voice 202.720.4517 Fax 202.720.5871

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer
Faulk, Scott (OSn 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Harley Tancayo <harleytancayo@yahoo.com>, 

Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:34 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Fw: Mokulele airlines 

On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 5:31 PM, Harley Tancayo <harleytancayo@yahoo.com> wrote: 

To whom it may concern, my name is Harley Tancayo, I always use Mokulele Airlines. It's the ontime airlines. It's been servicing Moloka'i for quite some time now. The workers here are very friendly 

and very helpful. It'll be great to know that Mokulele could service Kalaupapa and the rest of the 

other island. They're reliable, efficient and prices are reasonable. Please choose Mokulele as your 

choice. 

Thank you, Harley Tancayo 

1
NOSB Spring 2022 Voting Outcomes

Subcommittee Substance/ Motion NL Section/ Guidance Doc Type Motion by: Seconded by: Vote threshold AMY BRUCH BRIAN CALDWELL JERRY D'AMORE CAROLYN DIMITRI RICK GREENWOOD LIZ GRAZNAK KIM HU

Certification,Accreditation andCompliance

Motion to send the proposal on the NOP Risk

Mitigation Table review back to Subcommittee.

NA Proposal Kyla Smith Amy Bruch 1/2 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 

Handling Motion to classify cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC)

as a non‐agricultural synthetic substance.

§205.605 Proposal ‐

Petitioned

WoodTurner

Kyla Smith 2/3 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 

Handling Motion to add cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC)

with the following annotation: “CPC can only beused in formulation with propylene glycol per

FDA requirements” at 7 CFR 205.605(b).

§205.605 Proposal‐

Petitioned

WoodTurner

Kyla Smith 2/3 N N N N N N N 

Handling Motion to send the proposal on the phosphoric

acid annotation change at §205.605(b) back to

Subcommittee.

§205.605 Proposal ‐

Petitioned

Kyla Smith Mindee

Jeffery

1/2 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 

Materials Motion to accept the proposal on Excluded

Methods Spring 2022 ‐ determinations for cell

and protoplast fusion.

Misc Proposal Mindee

Jeffery

LoganPetrey

2/3 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 

Crops Highly Soluble Nitrogen Fertilizers: Motion to

add at § 205.105: nitrogen fertilizers with a C: Nratio of 3:1 or less, including those individual

components of a blended fertilizer formulation,

are limited unless use is restricted to a

cumulative total use of 20% of crop needs.

§205.601 Proposal Amy Bruch Brian

Caldwell

2/3 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 

Crops Motion to send proposal to add carbon dioxide

at §205.601(a) algicide, disinfectants, and

sanitizer, including irrigation system cleaning

systems, and (j) as plant or soil amendments,

back to Subcommittee.

§205.601 Proposal ‐

Petitioned

RickGeenwood

KimHuseman

1/2 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 

PolicyDevelopment

Motion to accept the proposed updates to the

PPM regarding the public comment process.

N/A Proposal Mindee

Jeffery

JerryD'Amore

2/3 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 

Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certification**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States      Code)**

| Date:                     February                12,                2007                           |  /s/                  Zan                  Guerry                                             Zan                  Guerry Chairman                  and Chief Executive Officer  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                     February                  12,                  2007                           |  /s/                    Robert E.                    Bosworth                                  Robert                    E. BosworthPrincipal                    Financial Officer  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
U0-/5

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 03-13-00307-CR OFFENSE: 28.03F

Marc Trace Wyatt v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Lee

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 21st District Court

DATE: 12/19/14 Publish: NO TCCASE#: 7583

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Marc Trace Wyatt v.

STYLE: Texas

The State of

Petition

:CAIS:

CCA. 110-/5"

PRO SE

T 9 W

CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN ( DATE:

RgFuttrb JUDGE:

DATE: 03//f/M?lT SIGNED: PC:

JUDGE: nh UaAU<i~^ PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
# EUR-Lex - 22003D0009 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22003D0009

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 9/2003 of 31 January 2003 Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 094 , 10/04/2003 P. 0059 - 0060 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 9/2003

of 31 January 2003

Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 16/2001 of 28 February 2001(1).

(2) Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety(2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement.

(3) Directive 2001/95/EC repeals, with effect from 15 January 2004, Directive 92/59/EEC(3), which is incorporated into the Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Chapter XIX of Annex II to the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

1. the following point shall be inserted after point 3g (Council Directive 69/493/EEC):

"3h. 32001 L 0095: Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety (OJ L 11, 15.1.2002, p. 4)";

2. the text of point 3a (Council Directive 92/59/EEC) shall be deleted with effect from 15 January 2004.

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2001/95/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 February 2003, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(4).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2003.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

P. Westerlund

(1) OJ L 117, 26.4.2001, p. 16.

(2) OJ L 11, 15.1.2002, p. 4.

(3) OJ L 228, 11.8.1992, p. 24.

(4) Constitutional requirements indicated.
EX-10.4
                              PROMISSORY NOTE


Credit Line of not more than: $2,500,000                     July 15, 1999

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Platforms International
Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation, of 8939 S. Sepulveda Blvd.,
Suite 532, Los Angeles, CA 90045, promises to pay to the order of
William C. Martin, at 16430 Ventura Blvd., Suite 306, Encino,
California 91436, or such other place as the holder may designate in
writing to the undersigned, the principal sum of the outstanding
advances, together with five shares of Platforms International
Corporation's common stock for each dollar advanced under this
agreement. Payments shall be made whenever the borrower is capable of
and applied against principal only in the amount the borrower can
reasonably afford and at times that are mutually agreeable commencing
as soon as possible. The entire principal amount shall be repaid on
or before January 1, 2001.

Payments of cash shall be applied to the balance to principal. The
share of common stock of Platforms International Corporation due
under this Note shall be issued whenever the authorized but unissued
shares are sufficient to do so.

All or any part of the aforesaid principal sum may be prepaid at any
time and from time to time without penalty.

In the event of any default by the undersigned in the payment of
principal or shares of common stock when due or in the event of the
suspension of actual business, insolvency, assignment for the benefit
of creditors, adjudication of bankruptcy, or appointment of a
receiver, of or against the undersigned, the unpaid balance of the
principal sum of this promissory note shall at the option of the
holder become immediately due and payable and the about then due
shall accrue interest until payment at the rate of eighteen percent
(18%) per annum or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever is
less.

No collateral will be provided.

First amendment to the "PROMISSORY NOTE" dated July 15, 1999, issued
to William C. Martin by Platforms International Corporation, an
Oklahoma Corporation, for a Credit Line of not more than
$2,500,000.00

Whereas both William C. Martin and Platforms Wireless International
Corporation (formally Platforms International Corporation) agree that
the credit line of not more than $2,500,000.00 should be increased to
not more than $5,000,000;

Whereas both parties to the note dated July 15, 1999 further agree
that the rest of the note requires no changes.

Now, therefore, both William C. Martin and Platforms Wireless
International Corporation agree that the note now should read "a
credit line of not more than $5,000,000 as of July 15, 2000.



Agreed to: /s/  William C. Martin                        Date: July 15, 1999
           William C. Martin


Agreed to: /s/  Charles B. Nelson                        Date: July 15, 1999
           Charles B. Nelson, CFO & Sr. Vice President
           Platforms International Corporation
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, James M. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                          /s/ James M. Johnson
                                          --------------------
                                          James M. Johnson
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          November 10, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
```
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Richard J. O’Brien, Deceased.

—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: The Surrogate improvidently exercised his discretion by granting a preliminary injunction restraining petitioner from transferring or disposing of jointly-held assets upon the ground that petitioner would not be harmed by imposition of the injunction. It is settled law that a preliminary injunction should not be granted unless the movant demonstrates (1) a likelihood of success on the merits, (2) irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted, and (3) that a balance of the equities weighs in her favor *(Preston Corp. v Fabrication Enters.,*68 NY2d 397, 406; *Grant Co. v Srogi, 52*NY2d 496, 517). The issue, therefore, is not whether the party sought to be restrained would be harmed if the injunction were granted, but whether the party moving for the injunction would be irreparably harmed if the application for a preliminary injunction were not granted.

The movant has failed to demonstrate irreparable harm or a likelihood of success on the merits. The record is devoid of evidence that petitioner has transferred, or is about to transfer or has threatened to transfer, any jointly-held assets. Further, a preliminary injunction should not be issued where the moving party has shown no more than the existence of some evidentiary conflicts which do not convincingly demonstrate a meritorious claim *(see, Sutton, DeLeeuw, Clark & Darcy v Beck,*155 AD2d 962, 963; *Armbruster v Gipp,*103 AD2d 1014). (Appeal from Order of Niagara County Surrogate’s Court, DiFIorio, S.—Preliminary Injunction.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C .
Northwes t

Airlines , Inc. , Delt aAirlines , Inc . AirTra n Airway s Inc. , Continenta l Airlines , Inc. , Southwes t

Airlines , Inc . Complainant s /

Appellee s Indianapoli s Airpor t

Authority , Indianapoli s Internationa l Airport , BAA-Indianapoli s

Respondent s /

Appellant s m l_, : —ir

Docke t No . 16-07-0 4

NOTIC E O FEXTENSIO N O FTIM E Thi s matte r

i s befor e th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA ) basedo n th e above

reference dcomplaint , filedi n accordanc e withFA A Rule s o f

Practic e fo r

Federally

Assiste dAirpor t

Enforcemen t

Proceedings , 1 4 CF RPart 1 6 (Rule s o f

Practice) . Pursuan t t o th e Rule s o f

Practice , Sectio n 16.1 1 (a) , th e dat e b y whic hth e Final Agenc y Decisio n wil l b e issue di n thi s matte r i s hereb y extende dt o Jun e 24 , 2009 . A n extensio n o f

tim e i s necessary an dappropriat e fo r afair an dcomplet e determinatio n i n thi s case .

^•^ , Catherin e M . Lan g Actin g Associat e Ad

i fo r Airport s istrato r ^j^at e



# zv ^CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E I HEREB Y CERTIF Y tha t o n IUOJ I l3^M ? I cause dt o b e place di n th e Unite dState s mai l (firs t

clas s mail , postag e ^id ) atru e cop y o f th e Notic e o f

Extensio n o f Tim e addresse dto : Fo r Complainant s Rober t E . Coh n Jonatha n L . Abra m Patric k R . Rizz i HOGAN & HARTSON , L.L.P . 55 5 ThirteenthStreet , N W Washington , D C 2000 4 Bria n Mattingly , Regional Directo r

Airport Affair s Gar y Bunce , Assistan t Genera l Counse l NORTHWES T AIRLINES , INC . 270 0 Lon e Oa

k Parkway Eagan,M N 5512 1 Josep hZan g Assistan t Genera l Counse l Rebecc aBays , General Attorne y DELT A AI RLINE S IN C 103 0 Delt aBoulevar d Atlanta , GA 3032 0 Richar dP . Magurn o Senio r Vic e Presiden t

& Genera l Counse l AI RTRA N AIRWAYS , IN C 995 5 AirTran Boulevar d Orlanda , FA 3282 7 Lorrain e B . Hailowa y CROWEL L& MORINGLLP 100 1 Pennsylvani aAvenu e N W Washington , D C 2000 4 Counse l fo r

Continenta l Airlines , Inc . Rober t W . Kneisle y Associat e Genera l Counse l Lesli e Abbot t Attorne y SOUTHWES T AIRLINE S CO . 190 1 LStreet , NW , Suit e 64 0 Washington , D C 2003 6

Thoma s Newto n Boilin g Managin g Attorney , Regulatory Affair s CONTINENTA LAIRLINES , IN C P.O . Bo x 460 7 - HQSL G Houston , T X 7721 0Fo r

Respondent s Pabl o O . Nuesc h Jeffre y A . Schwar z SPIEGE L& MCDIARMI D LLP 133 3 New Hampshir e Ave. , N W Washington , D C 2003 6 Rober t A . Dunca n Airport Directo r Indianapoli s Airport

Authority Indianapoli s Internationa l Airport 250 0 SouthHig hSchoo l Road , Suit e 10 0 Indianapolis , I

N 46241-494 3 Cop y t o FA A Part

1 6 Airport

Proceeding s Docke t

^ Vl<^^^ . Almari aGd&ySnfo

r Offic e of/wpor t

Complianc e an dFiel aOperation s
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 13, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00521

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF JOHN MOORE KILLIAN , Deceased,

From the Probate Court No 1

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Co urt No. 2019

- PC

- 2157

Honorable Oscar J. Kazen , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The parties have filed a joint motion to abate this appeal for mediation. We decline to abate this appeal but GRANT the motion to the extent that we suspend the appellate deadlines in this appeal until August 1, 2022. C ounsel of record for each party and the authorized representatives of each party are instructed to attend mediation and to make good faith efforts to

re solve this suit.

The mediator shall file a written report concerning the disposition of the case with the

Clerk of this Court no later than August 1, 2022

. If no written report is filed by August 1, 2022, the appellate deadlines in this appeal will be re instated and appellee’s brief will be due within thirty days

.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of June, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Buhpinder Singh 8/1 2/2015 WFD Analysis 

A4A Robert Ireland 8/27/2015 Service Action 

Other/ Additional Information: