IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 123 

Expressing support for designation of August 6 as National Voting Rights 

Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2015 

Mr. HASTINGS (for himself, Mr. TAKAI, Ms. NORTON, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. 

MEEKS, Mr. KILMER, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. WELCH, Mr. 

DEUTCH, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Ms. 

WILSON of Florida, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. MURPHY of Florida, Ms. 

MAXINE WATERS of California, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mrs. 

BUSTOS, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. CHU of California, Ms. KAPTUR, Ms. MOORE, 

Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. HONDA, Ms. SLAUGHTER, 

Mr. LEVIN, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. 

SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. CUMMINGS, Ms. FUDGE, 

Mr. COHEN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. YARMUTH, and Ms. CASTOR of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of August 6 as National 

Voting Rights Day. 

Whereas the landmark Voting Rights Act was signed into law 

by President Lyndon B. Johnson on August 6, 1965; 

Whereas the Voting Rights Act is arguably the Nation’s most 

important law for removing race-based restrictions on 

voting and has stood as an essential safeguard against 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 123 IH 

racial discrimination in our political system since its inception; 

Whereas prior to its passage, African-Americans were often 

systematically prevented from voting by tactics such as 

literacy tests, poll taxes, the grandfather clause, and intimidation and violence; 

Whereas in response a violent backlash sparked by efforts to 

register Black voters in the Deep South in the 1960s, the 

Johnson Administration proposed the enactment of a voting rights law which provided for direct Federal intervention to uphold the guarantees of the fifteenth amendment; 

Whereas the Voting Rights Act was enacted in 1965 to rectify years of disenfranchisement of African-American voters by prohibiting States from imposing qualifications or 

practices to deny access to the ballot on account of race, 

permitted direct Federal intervention in the electoral 

process in certain places based on a specific formula, and 

required preclearance of new laws in covered States to 

ensure that they did not have the purpose or effect of 

limiting the ability to vote on account of race; 

Whereas following enactment of this critically important legislation, Black voter registration and participation increased dramatically; 

Whereas the Voting Rights Act has had a significant impact 

on electoral dynamics by vastly expanding the number of 

African-American, Hispanic, and women elected officials 

on both a local and national level; 

Whereas the recent Supreme Court decision in Shelby County 

v. Holder and State laws that place restrictions on voters 

have dealt a heavy blow to voter protections nationwide; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 123 IH 

Whereas although progress has undoubtedly been made in the 

49 years since the Voting Rights Act was passed, sadly, 

discrimination continues to exist; and 

Whereas the Nation must remain committed to the fight to 

create an open and transparent electoral process for all 

United States citizens: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Vot3 ing Rights Day’’ in commemoration of the upcoming 

4 50th anniversary of the enactment of the Voting 

5 Rights Act of 1965; 

6 (2) acknowledges the significance of the Voting 

7 Rights Act with regard to enforcing the civil rights 

8 of all United States citizens; and 

9 (3) emphasizes the importance of ensuring the 

10 ability of all United States citizens to fully partici11 pate in the electoral process. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS