alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JUT FLAKE

I h.:! Hr, r**:~t**...!)**r'-~1\! ~** **r:-1~\!** fH**:·~l** 11 JIV. :-':;·**Clli\P\~if** !lL Or'\1 [if[ 1\l!nCil'f'i'f**~--0~/M>il!** t**(lr'-~** J\t

. 1INi,
The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania /\venue, N.W. Washington, DC 20460 DearAdministrator McCarthy, 

# United .5tatcs**~rnJtc** May 12,2014 • ••' rJJ,, lr:.• r

i l'" '"r.,H , ,•J•rt

. ·jl,

•'•'' · -.i· :44-r fi

Iappreciate your efforts to facilitate the November 20, 2013 exceptional events rulcmaking listening session with Arizona stakeholders. Unfortunately, Iwas disappointed to learn that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to delay the rulcmaking process- both because ofthe pressing need for arulemaking and from learning ofthe delay via press reports. Adraft rule was expected by late 2013 or curly 2014. While the proposed rule is reportedly ncar completion and ready tor review by the White House. it is my understanding that the release has now been delayed until2015. Initial reports indicate that the delay is due to agency resource constraints. Given the agency's regulatory zeal in recent years, Iwould suggest that ahigher priority should be the resources that the current approach to exceptional events saps from limited state budgets. In 2011 and 20I2, Arizona was forced to submit a total of I8exceptional event demonstrations. Though ultimately approved, the combined estimated cost ofproving to EPA that the state should not be held responsible for airquality exceedances it had no way ofcontrolling was $675,000 and 790 stan:.hours. · Additionally, there appears to be some thought that the immediate urgency for the rulemaking for exceptional events is diminished because the agency will not be proposing National Ambient Air Quality Standard nonattainmcnt areas designations for several years. Even ifaccurate, this belies the potential for how long a rulemaking such as this can ultimately take to complete, and the necessity for established regulatory rules ofthe road, and the required planning time for state and local air quality agencies faced with exceptional events. Unfortunately, this lli.!W delay prolongs aprocess that is notorious for its cost, complexity, opaqueness, and uncertainty. While Icontinue to evaluate legislative options, EPA needs to move forward with arulemaking in an expeditious manner that maximizes transparency and predictability and minimizes the unnecessary regulatory and cost burdens for the states, tribes, and local governments. Toward that end, l request an accurate' and up-to-date timetable for the exceptional events rulemaking including when the agency anticipates noticing the proposed rule and seck your assurances that the rulemaking process will not be subject to further delays. Iappreciate your prompt attention to this request. in strict accordance with agency rules, regulations, and ethil:al guidelines, and would appreciate awritten response to these concerns.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Autocam Corporation (the "Company") for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as delivered on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John C. Kennedy, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: November 12, 2004                              /s/ John C. Kennedy
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                       John C. Kennedy
                                                             President
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply10779Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Michael Lilly (not verified)PermalinkSeptember 22, 2021 - 12:24pmThis is my first time of the Summerhouse built, our next trip to the Capital I put this as a number 1 stop.  Especially in fall, Thank you for this trip into our past.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,355,000
<SECURITIES>                                27,206,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,853,000
<PP&E>                                       2,331,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,167,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,047,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,226,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   117,494,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (86,882,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,047,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  623,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (211,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
|Exhibit 23.1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Consent of Independent Public Accountants                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8 Registration Statements, File Numbers, 033-65256, 033-65254, 033-65890, 333-07735, 333-46791, 333-46795, 333-46797, and 333-46809 of our report dated July 17, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Butler National Corporation included in the Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2009.
/s/ Weaver & Martin, LLC
Kansas City, Missouri
July 17, 2009
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification:
 
 I, Richard K Brock, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AFG Investment Trust D;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
 
 c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 d)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 e)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 
 6.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 /s/ Richard K Brock
 Richard K Brock
 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of AFG ASIT Corp.,
 the Managing Trustee of the Trust
 (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 May 14, 2004
EXHIBIT  99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AFG Investment Trust C (the "Trust"),
on  Form  10-Q  for  the  period  ended  September  30,  2002  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  the  Principal  Executive Officer of the Trust's Managing Trustee,
hereby  certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:
(1)     the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and
(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of the Trust.

                    /s/  Gary  D.  Engle
                    --------------------
                    Gary  D.  Engle
President  of  AFG  ASIT  Corporation,
 the  Managing  Trustee  of  the  Trust
(Principal  Executive  Officer)
                    November  19,  2002
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Sharecroppers
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

EverGreene Painting Studios

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1994

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

A couple picks cotton in the south with their cabin behind them and the plantation house in the distance.About the Cox Corridors MuralsThe first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The western north-south corridor, called the Westward Expansion corridor, includes maps and scenes showing the growth of the United States from early exploration through the acquisition of Alaska and Hawaii. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 901 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 901

 To prohibit accessing pornographic web sites from Federal computers, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2015

 Mr. Meadows introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit accessing pornographic web sites from Federal computers, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminating Pornography from 
Agencies Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCESSING PORNOGRAPHIC WEB SITES FROM FEDERAL 
              COMPUTERS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Except as provided in subsection (b), not later 
than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director 
of the Office of Management and Budget shall issue guidelines that 
prohibit the access of a pornographic or other explicit web site from a 
Federal computer.
    (b) Exception.--The prohibition described in subsection (a) shall 
not apply to any Federal computer that is used for an investigative 
purpose that requires accessing a pornographic web site.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Mark F. Hanks v. The Huntington National Bank

Appellate case number: 01-15-00188-CV

Trial court case number: 1056196

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County

On March 6, 2015, this Court abated this case after granting the emergency motion 

by the appellant, Mark F. Hanks, to stay the issuance of the writ of possession until a 

hearing could be held in the trial court to review the excessiveness of the supersedeas 

bond in this forcible detainer action. In that Order of Abatement, this Court noted that 

this case would be reinstated after both a supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental 

reporter’s record were filed in this Court.

On April 6, 2015, the trial clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record, identified by 

the clerk as a “Second Indigent Clerk’s Record,” containing, among other documents, the 

“Judgment and Order Sustaining Contest to Pauper’s Oath,” finding appellant was not 

indigent for purposes of appellate costs, and “Order Reducing Supersedeas Bond,” 

reducing the $41,589.00 bond to $100.00, both signed on March 31, 2015. On April 10, 

2015, appellant filed a “Notice of Reduction of Supersedeas Bond and Motion to Waive 

Court Reporter’s Record of Hearing.” Appellant requests reinstatement of this appeal 

and waiver of the requirement for the filing of the supplemental reporter’s record of the 

March 31, 2015 bond hearing because, among other reasons, the bond issue is now moot

after the trial court reduced it and appellant posted the $100.00 bond on March 31, 2015.

Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion to waive the reporter’s record of 

the bond hearing and directs the Clerk of this Court to reinstate this appeal and note that 

appellant is not indigent for appellate purposes.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 21, 2015
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Timothy Sherlock, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;Dated: June 14, 2006       By: /s/ Timothy Sherlock       By: Timothy Sherlock  Title: Chief Financial Officer
10132

#### Jim v. Planning Commission

Dismissed
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 -73

37 38 39 40 41


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/06 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 06 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
March 25, 2003

21840

#### State v. Silva

Affirmed
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6581

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SEAN ROBERT ADDISON, a/k/a Bounce, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-99-659-DWS; CA-02-1327-22-3) Submitted: August 27, 2004 Decided: September 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sean Robert Addison, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Sean Robert Addison seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Addison has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED