alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Roger Williams Statue
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Franklin Simmons

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1872

Location
      
Hall of Columns

This statue of Roger Williams was given to the National Statuary Hall Collection by Rhode Island in 1872.

Roger Williams was born in England between 1603 and 1606. He grew up a member of the privileged class and received a thorough liberal arts education from Sir Edward Coke, the great English jurist. Under Sir Edward's tutelage, Williams attended Cambridge, receiving his B.A. in 1627. He abandoned the study of law to become a priest in the Church of England.

Williams was interested in the Puritan movement and the newly established Massachusetts Bay Colony. He was warmly welcomed to the New World by Massachusetts governor John Winthrop when he arrived in Boston. Williams was an adamant separatist and accepted a post as an assistant pastor in Salem, reputedly a friendly place. However, his teachings were deemed radical and he was banished from Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1635. Williams founded the colony of Rhode Island in 1636 and secured a charter for Providence Plantation in 1664. His greatest gift to the colonies was his authorship of the declaration of the principle of religious liberty. Roger Williams died in 1683, around the age of 80.

Three hundred years after his banishment from Massachusetts, a monument in his honor was erected in Providence, Rhode Island. Set in a public park once part of Williams's property, it reminds Rhode Islanders of their illustrious founder and champion of religious freedom. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12745Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Valery Klaw (not verified)PermalinkOctober 27, 2023 - 3:24pmI feel lucky to do work that I love as well. The wildflowers and roses at the First Lady's greenhouse section are beautiful 😍 Thanks for serving.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2016202EN.01013501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/135 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/135

---

Article 195

1.   The Union shall complement the action of the Member States in the tourism sector, in particular by promoting the competitiveness of Union undertakings in that sector.

To that end, Union action shall be aimed at:

| (a) | encouraging the creation of a favourable environment for the development of undertakings in this sector; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

encouraging the creation of a favourable environment for the development of undertakings in this sector;

| (b) | promoting cooperation between the Member States, particularly by the exchange of good practice. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

promoting cooperation between the Member States, particularly by the exchange of good practice.

2.   The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish specific measures to complement actions within the Member States to achieve the objectives referred to in this Article, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.

---
18010, 18037

#### State v. Mamac; State v. Arashiro

Vacated and remanded1

1

 Vacated and Remanded for hearing on the merits of Appellant's HRPP 48 motion. *See, Dwyer,*78 Hawai'i 367, 893 P.2d 795; *Lau,*78 Hawai'i 54, 890 P.2d 291.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Michael T. Mino, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of T-3 Energy Services, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.           */*s/ MICHAEL T. MINO    Michael T. Mino    Chief Financial Officer    November 9, 2006
1

The Honorable Carolyn P. Chiechi, United States Tax Court Judge.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-2789

___________

Paul L. Bowman, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the

v. * United States Tax Court.

*

Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: August 1, 2008

Filed: August 7, 2008

___________

Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Paul Bowman appeals the tax court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment.

Having carefully reviewed the record and considered the arguments advanced by

Bowman on appeal, we conclude summary judgment was proper. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons set forth in the tax court’s well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00002-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.S.

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-PA-00206

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2015

AFFIRMED

This is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating Appellant Andrew S.’s parental 

rights.1 Appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional 

evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. 

Counsel concluded that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements 

of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 

21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order) (applying Anders procedure in appeal 

from order terminating parental rights), disp. on merits, 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 2003, no pet.). Appellant was provided copies of counsel’s brief and motion to withdraw 

1

To protect the privacy of the parties in this case, we identify the children by their initials and the parents by their first

names only. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d) (West 2014).

 
04-15-00002-CV

and was informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. In addition, counsel 

advised appellant to file a motion in this court if he wished to review the appellate record and 

enclosed a form motion for that purpose. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 320 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2014); In re R.R., 2003 WL 21157944, at *4. This court then set a deadline for appellant to file the 

motion requesting the record and set a deadline for appellant to file a pro se brief. Appellant did 

not request access to the record or file a pro se brief.

We have reviewed the record and the attorney’s Anders brief, and we agree with counsel 

that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the trial 

court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights. 

Karen Angelini, Justice

- 2 -
Exhibit 15.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTSWe consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-143183 on Form S-8of our reports dated March 28, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements of KHD Humboldt WedagInternational Ltd. (“KHD”) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes a separatereport titled Comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on Canada-United States ofAmerica Reporting Difference referring to changes that have an effect on the comparability offinancial statements) and the effectiveness of KHD’s internalcontrol over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of KHD for the year endedDecember 31, 2007.   /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP   Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
#### State v. Abadiano

24786

09/18/2003

Vacated and reversed
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report included in Chattem, Inc.'s 1999 annual report and incorporated by
reference in the Form 10-K into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-35386, 33-78524, 33-78922, and 33-61267),
Form S-3 (Nos. 33-69961, 33-69397, 33-31113, 33-03091 and 33-85348), Form S-2
(No. 33-80770) and Form S-4 (No. 33-53627).

                                                      ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Chattanooga, Tennessee
February 24, 2000



                                        30
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 FOR
INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,484,538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               46,341,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 49,466,494
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           113,937,692
<PP&E>                                      60,630,732
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             209,835,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      107,107,879
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,614
<OTHER-SE>                                  68,666,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               209,835,769
<SALES>                                     72,774,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            72,774,728
<CGS>                                       57,546,031
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,546,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,493,392 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,995,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,656,653 
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,461,044
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,195,609 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,195,609 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15 
        

</TABLE>
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: McKaughan, Colleen

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:22 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa

Cc: Steckel, Andrew

Subject: FW: Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction SIP Call

Attachments: SSM SIP_2060-AR68_Final_PreambleRule.pdf; SSM SIP final rule_Fact Sheet.pdf; McCabe 

letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf

Hi, Megan and Lisa,

Here is the notification to both the State of Arizona and Maricopa County, AZ. I sent it to them this morning in this one

email.

Colleen McKaughan

Associate Director, EPA Region 9

520‐498‐0118

From: McKaughan, Colleen  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 10:05 AM

To: 'hrd@azdeq.gov'; 'ecm@azdeq.gov'; 'philmcneely@mail.maricopa.gov'; 'michaelfulton@mail.maricopa.gov'

Cc: Jordan, Deborah; Steckel, Andrew

Subject: Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction SIP Call

Dear Colleagues, 

This message is a follow-up to my recent phone calls to let you know the EPA Administrator did 

sign a final action today to ensure states have in place air pollution rules that apply to sources at all 

times, including when the source is operating during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction 

(SSM). 

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians 

concerning the treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, 

specifically how those emissions are treated in state implementation plan (SIP) provisions that the 

EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action, EPA has revised and clarified its policy 

concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act. 

EPA is calling for 36 states, including Arizona, and several air districts, including Maricopa County, to 

make changes to their SIPs, to protect public health and ensure consistency with the Clean Air Act 

and the EPA’s current SSM Policy. Your state will have 18 months to submit revisions of your state 

plan to EPA. Your state’s revised SIP is due to EPA by November 22, 2016. 

As part of our notification to Arizona about this final SIP call, I have attached to this email a letter 

from the EPA’s Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe, plus a prepublication version of the notice and the Fact Sheet. We have also posted a pre-publication 

version of the action on our website 

at: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html. 
2

EPA will continue to work closely with you to ensure the SIP revision process is as efficient as 

possible. If you or your staff have questions, please contact me at 520-498-0118, 

mckaughan.colleen@epa.gov, or Andy Steckel at 415-947-4115, steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

Colleen
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic NewAction Worksheet with 58 QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F7 Date: December 17, 2008 Revision 1 

## Record ofContacts FDMS Docket No. FAA

_ With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date Boeing 0011 Jensen 4 Feb 2009 ATA Mark Lopez (email) 10April 2009

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master list 10Verify That This is the Corree! Revision Before Use
# EUR-Lex - 12012M053 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M053

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE VI: FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 53 (ex Article 51 TEU) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0044 - 0044 *

Article 53

(ex Article 51 TEU)

This Treaty is concluded for an unlimited period.

--------------------------------------------------
NUMBER 13-11-00098-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JDS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AND 

GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellants,

v.

BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY OF TEXAS, INC., Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 445th District Court 

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, JDS Construction Company, Inc. and Great American Insurance 

Company, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 445th District Court of 

Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2009-01-0182-I. Appellants have filed a 

motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to 
2

settle and compromise their differences. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the 

appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to 

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) 

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

Having dismissed the appeal at appellants= request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

21st day of April, 2011.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Raj Das, certify that:
1.I have reviewed amendment no. 1 to this quarterly report on Form10-Q/A of *info*USA Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: August 10, 2004    */s/ Raj Das*  Raj Das Chief Financial Officer