alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE VI

JUSTICE

JUSTICE

Article 49

Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties

1.   No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national law or international law at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed. If, subsequent to the commission of a criminal offence, the law provides for a lighter penalty, that penalty shall be applicable.

2.   This Article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles recognised by the community of nations.

3.   The severity of penalties must not be disproportionate to the criminal offence.

---
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply614Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Michael Lilly ... (not verified)PermalinkDecember 22, 2018 - 3:33pmThe best way to describe this preservation is "WOW"  Thank you for this insight.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Opinion filed July 7 , 2011



## In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________


### No. 11

- 09

- 00003

- C V

__________

JIM AND ANN HUFFMAN , Appellants

V.

PENN

- CAL, LLC AND CLARK R. SIMONTON AND THADDEUS V. STUMP AS EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF GLEN SIMONTON , Appellees

On Appeal from the 266th District Court

Erath County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV27433

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a final summary judgment entered on December 1, 2008.
Appellants, Jim and Ann Huffman, filed their notice of appeal on January 5, 2009. After the
briefs were filed in this appeal, the case was set for oral argument on April 15, 201 0. One week
prior to oral argument, however, appellants notified the court that they had filed a petition for
bankruptcy. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.1

. Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2, we entered an order on2

April 8, 2010, suspending the appeal until further order of this court. The appeal has remained
suspended since April 8, 2010.
On April 28, 2011, the clerk of this court wrote a letter to the parties as king them to

advise the court of the status of the bankruptcy proceeding. Appellants’ counsel advised the clerk’s office in a letter dated May 26, 2011, that appellants were granted a bankruptcy discharge on April 11, 2011. Counsel’s letter concluded with the following statement: “Please advise if you need anything further before dismissing this appeal.” The clerk responded to counsel’s letter in a letter written on June 2, 2011, that advised the parties that “this appeal will be dismissed
unless one of the parties notifies this court in writing by June 17, 2011, that the party wishes to

retain this case on the appellate docket and shows grounds for continuing the appeal.” A
response has not been filed.
Based upon the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceeding, we reinstate the appeal. Upon
reinstatement, we dismiss the appeal based upon the request of ap pellants’ counsel and the absence of a request of any of the parties to continue the appeal in response to the clerk’s letter of June 2, 2011. Therefore, in accordance with appellants’ request and the acquiescence of the
parties, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

July 7 , 2011

Panel 1 consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Hill , J. 2

1 Rick Strange, Justice, resigned effective April 17, 2011. The justice position is vacant pending appointment of a successor by the governor.

2 John G. Hill, Former Justice, Court of Appeals, 2nd District of Texas at Fort Worth, sitting by assignment.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 5

SECTION 5

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 261

(ex Article 229 TEC)

(ex Article 229 TEC)

Regulations adopted jointly by the European Parliament and the Council, and by the Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Treaties, may give the Court of Justice of the European Union unlimited jurisdiction with regard to the penalties provided for in such regulations.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1554 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide for interest-free 

deferment on student loans for borrowers serving in a medical or dental 

internship or residency program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2019 

Mr. BABIN (for himself, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. POSEY, Mr. GOSAR, and Mr. STIVERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide 

for interest-free deferment on student loans for borrowers serving in a medical or dental internship or residency program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Resident Education 

5 Deferred Interest Act’’ or the ‘‘REDI Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1554 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFERMENT DURING A MEDICAL OR DENTAL IN2 TERNSHIP OR RESIDENCY PROGRAM. 

3 Section 455(f) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

4 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(f)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding 

6 subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘A borrower’’ and in7 serting ‘‘Except as provided in paragraph (5), a bor8 rower’’; 

9 (2) in paragraph (2)(A)— 

10 (A) by striking the matter following clause 

11 (ii); 

12 (B) in clause (ii), by striking the comma at 

13 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

14 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(iii) is serving in a medical or dental 

16 internship or residency program;’’; and 

17 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(5) SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN IN SCHOOL

19 DEFERMENT.—Notwithstanding any other provision 

20 of this Act, a borrower described in paragraph 

21 (2)(A)(iii) shall be eligible for a deferent, during 

22 which periodic installments of principal need not be 

23 paid and interest shall not accrue on any loan made 

24 to the borrower under this part.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
September 11, 2003

22621

#### Queen Victoria Corp. v. Young

Affirmed
March 24, 2015

Mr. Dustin Breau

570 Grinding Circle

Kaysville, UT 84037

Dear Mr. Breau:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your February 6, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0314), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply618Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  camille key (n... (not verified)PermalinkNovember 11, 2019 - 2:44amThanks for being so transparent. I hope you continue your works properly. Best regards to your site, It was really a big help to my research.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
----

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Kenneth S. Folberg  |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Kenneth S. Folberg      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,107,140
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  467,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,574,142
<PP&E>                                      61,036,141
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,557,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,052,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          152,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,899,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,052,371
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,064,964
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,868,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,515
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
January 23, 2006

25577

#### Cloherty v. Continental Air Lines, Inc.

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply589Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  David Price II... (not verified)PermalinkMarch 1, 2018 - 1:20pmThe Architect's Office did a wonderful job, as the ceremony was a beautiful tribute and everything looked very good.  It was nice of Congress to honor Rev. Graham in this manner and the presentations certainly speak to the spiritual basis of our country.  Nice job by all and thank you from this grateful American.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS<F1>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996<F1>
<CASH>                                          34,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  580,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                    61,754
<INVENTORY>                                    526,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,125,824
<PP&E>                                       1,635,058
<DEPRECIATION>                                 610,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,486,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          661,930
<BONDS>                                        903,807
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       320,476
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,486,807
<SALES>                                      3,840,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,840,303
<CGS>                                        3,256,345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,256,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                108,531
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             89,031
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    89,031
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.47
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY'S FISCAL YEAR ENDS ON THE SATURDAY CLOSEST TO DECEMBER 31.
FISCAL YEAR 1996 CONSISTS OF 52 WEEKS AND ENDS ON DECEMBER 28, 1996.
ALL QUARTERS IN 1996 HAVE 12 WEEKS, EXCEPT THE THIRD QUARTER OF 1996 WHICH
HAS 16 WEEKS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
July 11, 2001

22925

#### Sauve-Kitagawa v. Fat Friday's, Inc.

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Paul Genova, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul GenovaPaul GenovaPresident, Chief Financial OfficerNovember 13, 2008


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.30

February 8, 2000

Mr. Domenic Micale
1400 Providence Highway, Bldg. 2
Norwood, MA 02062

Dear Domenic:

This letter will evidence the terms of a retention bonus arrangement between you
and UroMed Corporation ("UroMed").

UroMed agrees that if you are an employee of the Company on February 28th 2002
(the "Retention Date"), UroMed will pay you a cash bonus in the amount of
$40,000 (the "Retention Bonus"). In the event that prior to the Retention Date
              ---------------
your employment is terminated for death or disability (as defined below), UroMed
will pay you or your estate a pro rata portion of the Retention Bonus based on
                              --- ----
the time elapsed between now and the date of such termination as compared to the
total period between now and the Retention Date.

You acknowledge that if your employment terminates for any other reason prior to
the Retention Date, including a termination by UroMed for any reason or no
reason at all, you will not be entitled to receive any portion of the Retention
Bonus. In addition, this letter is not intended to imply that you are anything
other than an "at will" employee of UroMed.

For purposes of the letter "total disability" is the same as that defined in
your UroMed Long Term Disability Policy.

Any payment of the Retention Bonus will be subject to applicable withholding.

This letter may not be amended or modified except by a writing signed by both of
us. This letter expresses our entire understanding regarding the Retention Bonus
and supersedes all prior discussions, understandings, or agreements, written or
oral, regarding the Retention Bonus.

Please sign where indicated below to confirm our agreement.

Sincerely yours,

UROMED CORPORATION

By: /s/ Dan Muscatello
    ------------------

Name:   Dan Muscatello

Title:  President and CEO

Agreement confirmed:

    /s/ Domenic Micale
    -------------------

Name:   Domenic Micale