alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 951 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to permit a State 

to require an applicant for voter registration in the State who uses 

the Federal mail voter registration application form developed by the 

Election Assistance Commission under such Act to provide documentary 

evidence of citizenship as a condition of the State’s acceptance of the 

form. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mr. SALMON (for himself, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GOSAR, and Mr. 

SCHWEIKERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to 

permit a State to require an applicant for voter registration in the State who uses the Federal mail voter registration application form developed by the Election Assistance Commission under such Act to provide documentary evidence of citizenship as a condition of the State’s 

acceptance of the form. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 951 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Sovereignty in 

3 Voting Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PERMITTING STATES TO REQUIRE VOTER REG5 ISTRATION APPLICANTS USING FEDERAL 

6 MAIL FORM TO SUBMIT DOCUMENTARY EVI7 DENCE OF CITIZENSHIP AS CONDITION OF 

8 ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6(a)(1) of the National 

10 Voter Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20505(a)(1)) 

11 is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 

12 the following: ‘‘, except that a State may require an appli13 cant who submits such form to provide documentary evi14 dence of the applicant’s citizenship as a condition of the 

15 State’s acceptance of the form.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to elections for 

18 Federal office held after the date of the enactment of this 

19 Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Opinion filed July 7, 2011

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-09-00003-CV

__________

JIM AND ANN HUFFMAN, Appellants

V.

PENN-CAL, LLC AND CLARK R. SIMONTON AND THADDEUS V. 

STUMP AS EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF GLEN SIMONTON, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 266th District Court

Erath County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV27433

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment entered on December 1, 2008. 

Appellants, Jim and Ann Huffman, filed their notice of appeal on January 5, 2009. After the 

briefs were filed in this appeal, the case was set for oral argument on April 15, 2010. One week 

prior to oral argument, however, appellants notified the court that they had filed a petition for 

bankruptcy. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.1. Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2, we entered an order on 
2

April 8, 2010, suspending the appeal until further order of this court. The appeal has remained 

suspended since April 8, 2010.

On April 28, 2011, the clerk of this court wrote a letter to the parties asking them to 

advise the court of the status of the bankruptcy proceeding. Appellants’ counsel advised the 

clerk’s office in a letter dated May 26, 2011, that appellants were granted a bankruptcy discharge 

on April 11, 2011. Counsel’s letter concluded with the following statement: “Please advise if 

you need anything further before dismissing this appeal.” The clerk responded to counsel’s letter 

in a letter written on June 2, 2011, that advised the parties that “this appeal will be dismissed 

unless one of the parties notifies this court in writing by June 17, 2011, that the party wishes to 

retain this case on the appellate docket and shows grounds for continuing the appeal.” A 

response has not been filed.

Based upon the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceeding, we reinstate the appeal. Upon 

reinstatement, we dismiss the appeal based upon the request of appellants’ counsel and the 

absence of a request of any of the parties to continue the appeal in response to the clerk’s letter 

of June 2, 2011. Therefore, in accordance with appellants’ request and the acquiescence of the 

parties, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

July 7, 2011

Panel1consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Hill, J.2

 

1

Rick Strange, Justice, resigned effective April 17, 2011. The justice position is vacant pending appointment of a 

successor by the governor.

2

John G. Hill, Former Justice, Court of Appeals, 2nd District of Texas at Fort Worth, sitting by assignment.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Joyce Berman (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 15, 2021 - 9:18pmBravo to the entire team at the Capitol.  Thank goodness you brought back our incredible Capitol in record time!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT (10)(a)    
  


FIRST AMENDMENT TO  


 STOCK UNIT PLAN FOR DIRECTORS  


 OF THE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY  


        The Stock Unit Plan for Directors of The Empire District Electric Company is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2002, in the following respects: 


	1.
	Section 7(c)(i)
is amended to read as follows:



	"(i)
	the
Director's Annual Retainer Fees as in effect on such January 1st or, if the Committee establishes a fixed amount for the Annual Credit for the applicable
calendar year, such fixed amount," 









	2.
	Section 7(d)(i)
is amended to read as follows:



	"(i)
	the
amount of the Eligible New Director's Retainer Fees (excluding meeting and committee fees) for the balance of the calendar year of his or her initial election as a Director
(computed as a percentage of the Annual Retainer Fees as in effect on the date of his or her initial election) or, if the Committee establishes a fixed amount for the Annual Credit for that calendar
year pursuant to Section 7(c)(i) above, the amount of the Annual Credit set by the Committee divided by twelve and multiplied by the number of whole months remaining for the balance of such
year" 






        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this First Amendment to the Stock Unit Plan for Directors of The Empire District Electric to be executed by its duly authorized representative
on this 31st day of January 2002. 



	 	 	THE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

 
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	Its President
	

ATTEST	
 	

 	
 	

 





	

By	
 	

 	
 	

 
	 	 	
	 	 
	Its Secretary	 	 











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT (10)(a)
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Rick Lipski (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 15, 2021 - 7:38pmThank you for all you do always, but especially on that day, and all days since.  Our thoughts are with you and our beautiful Capitol building.  Please remain on guard, vigilant, FREE, and safe.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1545 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion of 

certain fringe benefit expenses for which a deduction is disallowed in 

unrelated business taxable income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2019 

Mr. WALKER (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mr. GAETZ, 

Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. SUOZZI, and Mr. BUDD) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the inclusion of certain fringe benefit expenses for which 

a deduction is disallowed in unrelated business taxable 

income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF INCLUSION OF CERTAIN FRINGE 

4 BENEFIT EXPENSES IN UNRELATED BUSI5 NESS TAXABLE INCOME. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 512(a) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph 

8 (7). 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1545 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall take effect as if included in the amend3 ments made by section 13703 of Public Law 115–97. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
H. R. 1253 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 13507 

Van Nuys Boulevard in Pacoima, California, as the ‘‘Ritchie Valens Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. RITCHIE VALENS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 13507 Van Nuys Boulevard in Pacoima, California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ritchie Valens Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Ritchie Valens Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

HOWARD M. TALENFELD and JULIE ZOBEL TALENFELD,

Appellants,

v.

ROBINETTE HOMES SIGNATURE SERIES, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1748

[March 29, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Marina Garcia-Wood, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16-001758 

CACE (18).

Mark B. Schorr of Mark B. Schorr, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellants.

C. Cory Mauro of Mauro Law P.A., Boca Raton; and William Sklar of 

Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER, JJ., and ROBERTS, KATHLEEN H., Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Ralph Senzamici et al., Appellants, v Walter R. Young et al., Respondents.

—Levine, J.

Appeal (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from an order of the Supreme Court (Weiner, J.), entered May 7, 1990 in Rockland County, which, *inter alia,*granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Defendants signed an agreement on August 3, 1989 to purchase plaintiffs’ property for $245,000. The contract, drawn by plaintiffs’ attorney, required a down payment of $24,500, $2,000 payable upon defendants’ execution of the contract and the balance on or before August 7, 1989. The $24,500 down payment was also designated as liquidated damages for any willful default by defendants. The contract further provided that the "seller shall not be bound by any terms of this contract until it is executed by the purchaser and the seller and the down payment as set forth herein is received”.

At or immediately before the passage of the August 7, 1989 deadline for the payment of the balance of the down payment, *832defendants’ attorney informed plaintiffs’ attorney that defendants no longer wished to purchase the property. In addition to declining to remit the balance of the down payment, defendants stopped payment on the $2,000 check for the initial portion thereof. Plaintiffs then brought this action to recover the $24,500 provided for under the agreement as liquidated damages. After joinder of issue, plaintiffs moved for summary judgment and defendants cross-moved for the same relief. Supreme Court granted the cross motion and dismissed the complaint. This appeal by plaintiffs followed.

There should be an affirmance. A mutually binding bilateral agreement was contemplated by the parties, under the express language of the agreement. Plaintiffs’ moving papers failed to specify when they executed the agreement. In any event, plaintiffs clearly did not manifest, by delivery of a fully executed copy of the agreement or otherwise, their acceptance and intent to be bound before defendants withdrew their offer. Consequently, no legally operative agreement came into existence which plaintiffs were entitled to enforce, and Supreme Court correctly dismissed their suit for damages *(see, Manhattan Theatre Club v Bohemian Benevolent & Literary Assn.,*120 Misc 2d 1094, 1096-1097, *affd*102 AD2d 788, *affd*64 NY2d 1069; *see also, Farago v Burke,*262 NY 229, 232-233).

Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Opinion issued April 21, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00156-CV

———————————

MALORIE J. WHITEFIELD-ZLOTECKI AND ROBERT ZLOTECKI, 

Appellants

V.

SHIRLEY WHITEFIELD, Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. PR-0073110-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Malorie J. Whitefield-Zlotecki and Robert Zlotecki, representing 

that the underlying matter has been settled between the parties, have filed a motion 

to dismiss the appeal. No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion 
2

has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Further, although appellants failed 

to include a certificate of conference in their motion, more than 10 days have 

passed and no party has responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 

10.3(a).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.
October 27, 1998

20462

#### Doe, In re

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       9,860,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,120,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  147,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,657,000
<PP&E>                                       2,289,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,618,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,382,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,590,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   117,717,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (97,925,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,382,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,847,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,591,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered October 4 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00776
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF O .J.O. AND E.J.O., CH ILDREN On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 16
- 23995



### O RDER Before the Court is the September 27, 2019 request of Janet Saavedra, Official Court Reporter for the 254th Judicial District Court, for a sixty

- day extension of time to file the reporte r’s record. Ms. Saavedra explains that she will be on family leave for the month of October. We GRANT the motion to the extent that Ms. Saavedra shall file the reporter’s record by November 26, 2019 . To the extent that Ms. Saavedra request guidance as t o whether all requested record s are needed for the appeal, we DENY the motion. We caution Ms. Saavedra that further extension requests will be strongly disfavored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

|                               | **KPMG LLP**                        | Telephone      | (514) 840-2100 |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
| 600 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West | Fax                                 | (514) 840-2187 |
| Suite 1500               | Internet                            | www.kpmg.ca    |
| Tour KPMG                     |                                |           |
|                          | Montréal (Québec) H3A 0A3 |           |           |

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors Canadian National Railway Company

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated January 31, 2018 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Canadian National Railway Company (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the “financial statements”), and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, which reports appear in the December 31, 2017 annual report on Form 40-F of the Company.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports in the registration statements (No. 333-5258, No. 333-131856, No. 333-197799, No. 333-7520 and No. 333-204974) on Form S-8 of the Company and in the registration statement (No. 333-208547) on Form F-10 of the Company.

 

 

January 31, 2018

 

Montréal, Canada

 

----

*CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A123145

 

|   | KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership   and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated   with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.   KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

----