alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Disposition Comments Docket No: Directorate ID: 

### 2014-NM-051-AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 2013-020 Next Step: 

### [3'] FRAN 

## D SNPRM 

## D These comments are in response to an SNPRM



### [3'] 

### No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received

- 

## If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? Ifyes, list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously publishedNPRMwill require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focalpoint for guidance.
Instructions : Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all ofthe issues from one commenter together. Ifchanges to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9
. 

### ISSUE 1: Select one ofthefollowing: 

## If

other, explain: Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is itjustified? Do we agree? If 

### YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If

### PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: lfNO, we don 't agree because 

### ISSUE 2: Select one ofthefollowing: 

## If

other, explain: Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is itjustified? Do we agree? If

### YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If

### PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: 

### Page 1 of3

### IfNO, we don 't agree because

For additional issues, double-click here



### Page 2 of3

### Signature Section 

### Signature indicates concurrence with this action
. Originating Office Tracking No.:

ASE Printed Name: 

### Date

Branch Manager Date



### Page 3 of3
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VI

TRANSPORT

TRANSPORT

Article 97

(ex Article 77 TEC)

(ex Article 77 TEC)

Charges or dues in respect of the crossing of frontiers which are charged by a carrier in addition to the transport rates shall not exceed a reasonable level after taking the costs actually incurred thereby into account.

Member States shall endeavour to reduce these costs progressively.

The Commission may make recommendations to Member States for the application of this Article.

---
Exhibit 21.1

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                      |  |                       
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name                                  |  | State of Incorporation
|                                      | 
|Carrols Corporation                   |  | Delaware              
|                                      | 
|Carrols Realty Holdings Corp.         |  | Delaware              
|                                      | 
|Carrols Realty I Corp.                |  | Delaware              
|                                      | 
|Carrols Realty II Corp.               |  | Delaware              
|                                      | 
|Carrols J.G. Corp.                    |  | Delaware              
|                                      | 
|Quanta Advertising Corp.              |  | New York              
|                                      | 
|Pollo Franchise, Inc.                 |  | Florida               
|                                      | 
|Pollo Operations, Inc.                |  | Florida               
|                                      | 
|Taco Cabana, Inc.                     |  | Delaware              
|                                      | 
|TP Acquisition Corp.                  |  | Texas                 
|                                      | 
|T.C. Management, Inc.                 |  | Delaware              
|                                      | 
|Get Real, Inc.                        |  | Delaware              
|                                      | 
|Texas Taco Cabana, L.P.               |  | Texas                 
|                                      | 
|TC Lease Holdings III, V and VI, Inc. |  | Texas                 
|                                      | 
|Cabana Bevco, LLC                     |  | Texas                 
|                                      | 
|TC Bevco, LLC                         |  | Texas                 
|                                      | 
|Cabana Beverages, Inc.                |  | Texas                 
|                                      | 
|TPAQ Holding Corporation              |  | Delaware
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-50837

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARMANDO LEYVA-MUNOZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CR-334-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Armando Leyva-Munoz 

raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. 

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 228, 231-35 (1998), in which the Supreme Court 

determined that convictions used to enhance a sentence under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b) need not be set forth in the indictment. Accordingly, the 

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-50837 Document: 00513013197 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
No. 14-50837

motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of 

the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-50837 Document: 00513013197 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
<PAGE>
                                                           Exhibit 10.11(a)

                            WARREN PETROLEUM COMPANY,
                               LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                       13430 NORTHWEST FREEWAY, SUITE 1200
                            HOUSTON, TEXAS 77040-6095


                                October 14, 1996


Mr. R. D. Harrison
Chevron Chemical Company
1301 McKinney
Houston, Texas 77002

          RE:  CCC Product Sale and Purchase Agreement
               Article XII, Section 12.1 - Measurement and Analysis

Dear Mr. Harrison:

          Please reference Section 12.1 of the above referenced agreement which
addresses measurement techniques for Products that Warren Petroleum Company,
Limited Partnership ("Warren LP"), through its affiliate, Warren Gas Liquids,
buys and/or sells from and/or to Chevron Chemical Company ("Chevron Chemical").
As written, this section prescribes mass measurement for Ethane and E/P Mix
Products and volumetric measurement for other Products.

          Prior to the combination of NGC Corporation with the Warren Petroleum
Company ("Warren") and Natural Gas Business Unit divisions of Chevron U.S.A.
Inc., mass measurement was used to measure all Products sold to and/or purchased
from Chevron Chemical. It was not intended that the measurement techniques
previously used by Warren would change once the merger was completed.

          Keeping with Warren's prior practice, Warren LP and Chevron Chemical
mutually agree that the volume of all Products sold to Chevron Chemical shall be
measured on a mass basis. For invoice purposes, the mass quantity shall be
converted to a volumetric basis (gallons) per latest applicable API/GPA
standards or publications.

          If you agree with the foregoing, please evidence your agreement by
executing both of the originals of this letter enclosed herewith, keep one for
your records and return the other to me.



<Page>


For the purpose of this letter agreement, all capitalized terms as used herein
shall have the same meanings as set forth in the CCC Product Sale and Purchase
Agreement dated effective as of September 1, 1996 entered into between Warren LP
and Chevron Chemical.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             /s/ Hunter Battle

                                             Hunter Battle
                                             Director- Liquid Assets


AGREED THIS 21 DAY OF OCT, 1996:

CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY

By: /s/ R. D. Harrison
   ---------------------
   R. D. Harrison
November 8, 2006

26474

#### Moore, In re Estate of

Affirmed
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART ONE

PRINCIPLES

PRINCIPLES

TITLE II

PROVISIONS HAVING GENERAL APPLICATION

PROVISIONS HAVING GENERAL APPLICATION

Article 17

1.   The Union respects and does not prejudice the status under national law of churches and religious associations or communities in the Member States.

2.   The Union equally respects the status under national law of philosophical and non-confessional organisations.

3.   Recognising their identity and their specific contribution, the Union shall maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with these churches and organisations.

---
#### James William NIPP, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 7222.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 26, 1963.

No appearance for appellant.

Robert N. Chaffin, U. S. Atty., District of Wyoming, and Leroy V. Amen, Asst. U. S. Atty., District of Wyoming, on the brief, for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT, LEWIS, BREITENSTEIN, HILL, and SETH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pleaded guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. He seeks relief from the sentence imposed and asserts mental incompetence at the time of the guilty plea. The trial court treated his petition for coram nobis as an application under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and denied it without a hearing.

A claim of mental incompetence at the time of a guilty plea may be raised under § 2255 and, when raised, may not be disposed of without a hearing. See Ellison v. United States, 10 Cir., 324 F.2d 710, decided today. As in Ellison we direct the attention of the trial court to the admonitions appearing in Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 495-496, 82 S.Ct. 510, 7 L.Ed.2d 473, and in Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 20-23, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the views here expressed.
AMS Domestic Hemp Production 

Program 

Hemp eManagement Platform (HeMP) States and 

Tribes Bulk Upload of Producers Instructions

Agricultural Marketing Service

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Instructions for Populating the Bulk Upload Template 

Every month, States and Tribes must report any license and contact information for each new 

producer. The due date for this report is the 1st day of each month. If this date falls on a holiday or 

weekend, the report is due on the next business day. 

States and Tribes can now easily provide this information to USDA by filling out the open tab in the 

“Bulk Upload” spreadsheet and upload it (.csv-version only) to the report submission page within 

HeMP. Once submitted, your report will be reviewed and verified by USDA. 

The following instructions outline how to populate the excel template with producer information. 

1. Once you are on the “Producer Report” page, click the “Bulk Upload Template” link to download 

a copy to your computer. Save the .csv file to your computer. 

Note: Any file other than a .csv file will not be accepted for uploading. There is a maximum file size 

allotment of 2 MB or 2,000 rows. 

2. Review the template field definitions for each column on the next page to ensure that you are 

entering the information in the correct format. The field definitions also contain tips on how to 

avoid errors in your submission. 

Note: Reviewing these fields is an important step that will save you time when it it’s time to 

upload your bulk producers to the “Producer Report” page. 

2
Bulk Upload Template Field Definitions ( 1 of 3)

Template field definitions:

3
Bulk Upload Template Field Definitions (2 of 3)

Template field definitions continued:

4
Bulk Upload Template Field Definitions (3 of 3)

Template field definitions continued:

5
Instructions for Populating the Bulk Upload Template

3. On the open tab (which will populate based on your titling of the document), enter 

information about a single producer on each row (e.g. if you have 11 producers to report, 

there should be 11 rows of information). 

Note: As you enter in your data, it is recommended you save the file to your computer to avoid 

losing any important information. 

4. When you have completed your data entry, click “Save” on your file, and refer to the State 

and Tribe HeMP User Guide “Producer Bulk Upload Instructions” for specific details on how 

to upload your file and other relevant information.

You have now completed the process for populating your bulk upload template. 

6
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (the “Report”),
I, John A Hardy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                              
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2017 |  | /s/ John A. Hardy                            
|                    |  | John A. Hardy
        Chief Executive Officer
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 12 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit 

the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself and Mr. GALLAGHER) submitted the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to limit the number of terms an individual may 

serve as a Member of Congress. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 12 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person shall serve as a Representa3 tive for more than six two-year terms. Service as a Rep4 resentative for more than one year of any two-year term 

5 shall be treated as a complete term for purposes of this 

6 section, without regard to whether the service was com7 pleted by the individual originally elected to the term. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person shall serve as a Senator for 

9 more than two six-year terms. Service as a Senator for 

10 more than three years of any six-year term shall be treated 

11 as a complete term for purposes of this section, without 

12 regard to whether the service was completed by the indi13 vidual originally elected to the term. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 3. This article shall not apply to any per15 son who served as a Representative or as a Senator during 

16 any Congress occurring before the One Hundred Sixteenth 

17 Congress.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2016202EN.01035801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/358 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/358

---

61.   Declaration by the Republic of Poland on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

Declaration by the Republic of Poland on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

The Charter does not affect in any way the right of Member States to legislate in the sphere of public morality, family law, as well as the protection of human dignity and respect for human physical and moral integrity.

---
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 29, 2008

Mr. D. Bowen Berry

Berry & Randall

1701 Market Street, Suite 320 LB41

Dallas, TX 75202

Honorable Jeff Walker

96th Judicial District 

Tarrant County Justice Center

401 W. Belknap, 5th Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

Mr. Randall D. Moore

Law Offices of Randall D. Moore, P.L.L.C.

1301 Ballinger Street

Fort Worth, TX 76102

RE:Case Number:  07-0959

Court of Appeals Number:  02-07-00312-CV

Trial Court Number:  096-224404-07

Style:IN RE  SIMON KIBERU AND HARRIS METHODIST H-E-B HOSPITAL

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion in the above-referenced cause.  The stay order issued November 30, 2007 is lifted.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 07-0959Page 1**
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly
Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”),
I, L’Sheryl D. Hudson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                   
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2012 |  | /s/ L’Sheryl D. Hudson                            
|                       |  | L’Sheryl D. Hudson
        Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE II

FREEDOMS

FREEDOMS

Article 15

Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work

1.   Everyone has the right to engage in work and to pursue a freely chosen or accepted occupation.

2.   Every citizen of the Union has the freedom to seek employment, to work, to exercise the right of establishment and to provide services in any Member State.

3.   Nationals of third countries who are authorised to work in the territories of the Member States are entitled to working conditions equivalent to those of citizens of the Union.

---
88 P.3d 1209

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

April 21, 2004

24661

#### State v. Fergerstrom

Affirmed
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE III

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

Article 34

1.   The total amount to be made available to Croatia under the European Fisheries Fund in 2013 shall be EUR 8,7 million (current prices) in commitment appropriations.

2.   Pre-financing under the European Fisheries Fund shall be 25 % of the total amount referred to in paragraph 1 and shall be paid in one instalment.

3.   For the period covered by the next financial framework, the amounts to be made available to Croatia in commitment appropriations shall be calculated on the basis of the Union acquis applicable at that time. These amounts shall be adjusted in accordance with the following phasing-in schedule:

acquis

| — | 70 % in 2014, |
| --- | --- |

—

70 % in 2014,

| — | 90 % in 2015, |
| --- | --- |

—

90 % in 2015,

| — | 100 % as of 2016. |
| --- | --- |

—

100 % as of 2016.

4.   Insofar as the limits of the new Union acquis allow, an adjustment shall be made to ensure an increase of funds for Croatia in 2014 of 2,33 times the 2013 amount, and in 2015 of 3 times the 2013 amount.

acquis

---