alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 82438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 24, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 17, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 18 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-60, CP2024-61.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-25896 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Nahed Gabran et al., Appellants, v O & Y Liberty Plaza Company et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Nahed F. Gabran et al., Appellants, v V. J. Scordley et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

—In two actions brought by Nahed and Albert Gabran to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., Nahed and Albert Gabran appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated January 26, 1990, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 602 for a joint trial of the actions.

Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, the motion is granted, and the actions shall be tried jointly.

The plaintiffs allege in their bills of particulars and affidavits that certain injuries to the cervical spine suffered by the plaintiff Nahed Gabran in a slip and fall accident on September 30, 1987, were exacerbated in an automobile accident she suffered on October 24, 1988. In the interests of judicial economy, in order to avoid inconsistent verdicts, and in the absence of demonstrable prejudice, the motion to jointly try these two negligence actions should have been granted *(see, Dolce v Jones,*145 AD2d 594; *Heck v Walbaum’s Supermarkets,*134 AD2d 568; *Boyman v Bryant,*133 AD2d 802). Thomp*709son, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
# C_2016202EN.01039401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/394 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/394

---

Article 3

Right to the integrity of the person

1.   Everyone has the right to respect for his or her physical and mental integrity.

2.   In the fields of medicine and biology, the following must be respected in particular:

| (a) | the free and informed consent of the person concerned, according to the procedures laid down by law; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the free and informed consent of the person concerned, according to the procedures laid down by law;

| (b) | the prohibition of eugenic practices, in particular those aiming at the selection of persons; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the prohibition of eugenic practices, in particular those aiming at the selection of persons;

| (c) | the prohibition on making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the prohibition on making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain;

| (d) | the prohibition of the reproductive cloning of human beings. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the prohibition of the reproductive cloning of human beings.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of infoUSA Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that to thebest of my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        Date: August 9, 2006 */s/ Vinod Gupta*   Vinod Gupta,   Chief Executive Officer  
31
FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/20/2015 3:07:25 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply11796Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Gregory Permenter (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 22, 2022 - 12:21pmCongratulations on your success my friend, we worked side-by-side many nights we shared the struggle. You're the best!!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**Exhibit23.2**

** **

**WILLIAMM. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.**

Worldwide Petroleum Consultants

 
| 12770 Coit Road, Suite 907 | (972) 385-0354            |
|----------------------------|---------------------------|
| Dallas, Texas              | Fax: (972) 788-5165       |
|                       | E-Mail: office@wmcobb.com |

 

February 15, 2007

 

Nexen Inc.

801 7thAvenue SW

Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P7

Canada

 
| Attention: |   | Reserves Review Committee of the |
|------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|       |   | Board of Directors of Nexen Inc. |

 

Gentlemen:

 

We hereby consent to references to our firm relating to the evaluationand or audit of certain oil and gas properties of Nexen Inc. (the “Company”)contained in the section entitled “Oil and Gas Accounting – ReservesDetermination” within “Critical Accounting Estimates” as set out in Part II,Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December31, 2006.

 

 
|   | Sincerely,                             |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                                   |
|   | WILLIAM M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC. |
|   |                                   |
|   |                                   |
|   | /s/ FRANK J. MAREK                     |   |
|   | Frank J. Marek, P.E.                   |
|   | Senior Vice President                  |

 

FJM:jf

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HomePatient, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
F. Furlong, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

This Certification is executed as of August 5, 2004.

                           /s/ Joseph F. Furlong, III
                           --------------------------------
                           Joseph F. Furlong, III
                           Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<Page>


                                                                   Exhibit 11.1

                                WIRELESS TELECOM GROUP, INC.
                             COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                         (Unaudited)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             For the Three Months            For the Six Months
                                                                Ended June 30,                 Ended June 30,
                                                                --------------                 --------------
                                                              2002             2001              2002           2001
                                                              ----             ----              ----           ----
<S>                                                       <C>               <C>              <C>             <C>
Net Income                                                $ 535,866         $872,684         $ 904,518       $ 2,096,559
                                                          =========         ========         =========       ===========

BASIC EARNINGS:

Weighted average number of common shares
     Outstanding                                         17,184,875       17,815,120        17,176,201        18,054,986
                                                         ==========       ==========        ==========        ==========

Basic earnings per common share                               $0.03           $ 0.05             $0.05            $ 0.12

DILUTED EARNINGS:

Weighted average number of common shares
     Outstanding                                         17,184,875       17,815,120        17,176,201        18,054,986
Stock options                                               220,476          441,063           463,764           303,438
                                                         ----------       ----------        ----------        ----------

Weighted average number of common shares
     outstanding, as adjusted                            17,405,351       18,256,183        17,639,965        18,358,424
                                                         ==========       ==========        ==========        ==========

Diluted earnings per common share                             $0.03           $ 0.05             $0.05            $ 0.11

</TABLE>
















                                                                              14
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00072-CV

IN RE THEODIS DODSON, JR. RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 1072134

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered all of the filings in this original proceeding, 

including Judge Elizabeth H. Beach’s April 14, 2015 response indicating that she 

has ordered the court reporter to provide relator with information regarding the 

cost of copies of the jury selection part of the reporter’s record in his underlying 

criminal case. The court is of the opinion that relief should be denied as moot. 

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GARDNER and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 17, 2015

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7984** 

GARCEL LAVAR CHRISTIAN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. THEODIS BECK, Secretary of NC DOC; LANDAR CORPENING, Superintendent of Foothills CI, Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 1 :08

- c v - 0 0051

- NCT

- PTS )

Submitted : March 16, 2010 Decided: March 23, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Hoang Van Lam, NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INC., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Assistant Attorney General , Raleigh, Nort h Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Garcel Lavar Christ i an seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U .S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial o f a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006) . A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dis positive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);
Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683

- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Christian has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mat erials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply425Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Sarah (not verified) (not verified)PermalinkNovember 7, 2013 - 1:47pmI, like Katie, also did not know that this existed. I might have to check it out the next time I'm in that area of the city before a DC United game!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

21.   Declaration on the protection of personal data in the fields of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation

Declaration on the protection of personal data in the fields of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation

The Conference acknowledges that specific rules on the protection of personal data and the free movement of such data in the fields of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation based on Article 16 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union may prove necessary because of the specific nature of these fields.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1365 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 111
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1365

                          [Report No. 116-149]

    To make technical corrections to the Guam World War II Loyalty 
                            Recognition Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2019

 Mr. San Nicolas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

                             July 11, 2019

  Additional sponsors: Ms. Omar, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Bacon, Ms. Garcia of 
                  Texas, Mr. Shimkus, and Mr. Grijalva

                             July 11, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To make technical corrections to the Guam World War II Loyalty 
                            Recognition Act.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO GUAM WORLD WAR II LOYALTY 
              RECOGNITION ACT.

    Title XVII of division A of Public Law 114-328 is amended--
            (1) in section 1703(e)--
                    (A) by striking ``equal to'' and inserting ``not to 
                exceed''; and
                    (B) by striking ``covered into the Treasury as 
                miscellaneous receipts'' and inserting ``used to 
                reimburse the applicable appropriations'';
            (2) in section 1704(a) by striking ``, subject to the 
        availability of appropriations,'' and inserting ``from the 
        Claims Fund''; and
            (3) by striking section 1707(a).
                                                 Union Calendar No. 111

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1365

                          [Report No. 116-149]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To make technical corrections to the Guam World War II Loyalty 
                            Recognition Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 11, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
# Kentucky_county_differentials_2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1391 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1391

To provide regulatory relief for conventional marginally producing oil 
  and gas wells from the Environmental Protection Agency's ``Methane 
                                Rule''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2019

 Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide regulatory relief for conventional marginally producing oil 
  and gas wells from the Environmental Protection Agency's ``Methane 
                                Rule''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Methane Rule Relief Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF METHANE RULE.

    The final rule titled ``Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission 
Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources'' (81 Fed. Reg. 
35824, June 3, 2016), and the document titled ``Control Techniques 
Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry'' (October 2016), 
published by the Environmental Protection Agency, shall not apply with 
respect to--
            (1) any oil well that has a maximum daily average oil 
        production, during any 12-month consecutive time period, that 
        does not exceed 15 barrels of oil per day;
            (2) any natural gas well that has a maximum daily average 
        gas production, during any 12-month consecutive time period, 
        that does not exceed 90,000 cubic feet per day; or
            (3) any emissions source covered by the rule that is 
        associated with an oil well described in paragraph (1) or a 
        natural gas well described in paragraph (2).
                                 <all>
```