alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15


Goody's Family Clothing, Inc.
Knoxville, Tennessee

We have made a review, in accordance with standards  established by the American
Institute of Certified Public  Accountants,  of the unaudited  interim financial
information of Goody's Family  Clothing,  Inc. for the periods ended May 2, 1998
and May 3, 1997,  as indicated in our report dated May 19, 1998;  because we did
not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware  that our  report  referred  to above,  which is  included  in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 1998, is incorporated
by reference in Registration  Statements  Nos.  333-32357,  33-51210,  33-68520,
333-00052 and 333-09595 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report,  pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the  Securities  Act of  1933,  is not  considered  a part  of the  Registration
Statement  prepared  or  certified  by an  accountant  or a report  prepared  or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
May 19, 1998
<PAGE>
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10(b)  


  
 

  Consent of Independent Accountants    
  


        We hereby consent to the use, in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-60149) of our report dated March 1, 2002, relating to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the use
in this Registration Statement of our report dated April 2, 2002, on our audits of the financial statements of The Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement. 


PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

Birmingham, Alabama

April 25, 2002 









QuickLinks


Consent of Independent Accountants
EXHIBIT A


Dear Customer,

We are pleased to report that Intel has entered into a
settlement with Intergraph Corporation in connection with
its lawsuits with Intergraph.

As part of that settlement, we are obligated to inform you
that our settlement agreement by its terms does not provide
an immunity except for Intel products.

The settlement does not provide any immunity for the
combination of an Intel product with a non-Intel product.
Rather, the settlement expressly excludes immunity for any
in-combination use of Intel's products with any non-Intel
product.

Intel's settlement with Intergraph is consistent with
Intel's policy of standing behind its products.  Therefore,
when considering the use of non-Intel products, please note,
that any resulting combinations may require a separate
patent license from Intergraph Corporation.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact
(XYZ).

Very truly yours,

Intel
Order entered July 8, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01534-CR

MICHAEL ADAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-00936-Y

ORDER

The Court ORDERS court reporter Sharina Fowler to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of 

the date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit nos. 1, 2, 3, and 13.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

Sharina Fowler, Deputy Official Court Reporter, Criminal District Court No. 7, and to counsel 

for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1449 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1449

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 3033 203rd Street in Olympia Fields, Illinois, as the ``Captain Robert 
                        L. Martin Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CAPTAIN ROBERT L. MARTIN POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3033 203rd Street in Olympia Fields, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Captain Robert L. Martin Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain 
Robert L. Martin Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1408 

To amend the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 to eliminate the 

applicability of such Act to the District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2019 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 

to eliminate the applicability of such Act to the District 

of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

5 Non-Discrimination Home Rule Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF APPLICABILITY OF RELIGIOUS 

7 FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT TO THE DIS8 TRICT OF COLUMBIA. 

9 Paragraph (2) of section 5 of the Religious Freedom 

10 Restoration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb–2(2)) is 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1408 IH

1 amended by striking ‘‘the District of Columbia,’’ and the 

2 comma after ‘‘Puerto Rico’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Agricultural Marketing Service, Specialty Crops Program, Specialty Crops Inspection Division

This PATCH represents official guidance. This PATCH is scheduled to be incorporated into the 

document listed above. After incorporation into the document listed above this PATCH will 

become obsolete. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 

PATCH # 094 Walnut Sampling for In-line Inspections (July 6, 2023) 

SCI Division Inspection Series

Page 1 of 1 

PATCH # 094

DOCUMENT: Walnuts (Juglans regia) In the Shell and Shelled Inspection Instructions, 

December 1974

REMARKS: The “In-line” Inspections section on page 33 is revised to read as follows: 

“In-line” Inspections

When samples are being selected from the conveyors or containers (open or sealed) at the end of 

the sorting and packing line, a sample analysis should be selected every 30 minutes or every 

2,000 pounds, whichever comes first. 

Under continuous inspection, with samples being analyzed at 30-minute intervals or more 

frequently, there may be relatively little variation in the quality between consecutive subsamples. 

The average of these periodic subsamples constitutes the grade of the total pack. 

Use the following chart to determine the minimum quantity to analyze per subsample based on 

the size of the walnuts being inspected. 

Minimum quantity analyzed per subsample

In-Line 

Per 2,000 pounds or every 30 minutes 

(whichever comes first)

Size

Small Pieces 30 grams 

Pieces 50 grams 

Halves & Pieces 100 grams 

Halves 200 grams
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Kenneth Stastny, certify that: 

1. I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter covered by this report (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 15, 2007
# EUR-Lex - 22003D0001 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22003D0001

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 1/2003 of 31 January 2003 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 094 , 10/04/2003 P. 0043 - 0044 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 1/2003

of 31 January 2003

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex I to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 157/2002 of 6 December 2002(1).

(2) Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 54/2001 of 18 May 2001 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement(2) provides for a prolongation of the transitional period for Liechtenstein with regard to Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement until 31 December 2001 pending a lasting arrangement to be implemented by that date.

(3) The European Community, Liechtenstein and the Swiss Confederation agree on the application to Liechtenstein of Annex 11 (Veterinary matters) of the Agreement on trade in agricultural products between the European Communities and the Swiss Confederation on the basis of the Swiss-Liechtenstein Customs Treaty.

(4) Given that this solution provides for the application of Swiss veterinary legislation it is appropriate to exempt Liechtenstein from the provisions of this Chapter I,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The text of the first paragraph of the "SECTORAL ADAPTATIONS" to Annex I to the Agreement shall be replaced by the following:

"Chapter I, 'Veterinary issues', shall not apply to Liechtenstein."

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 February 2003, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(3).

It shall apply from 1 January 2002.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2003.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

P. Westerlund

(1) OJ L 38, 13.2.2003, p. 3.

(2) OJ L 165, 21.6.2001, p. 58.

(3) No constitutional requirements indicated.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 151 

To prohibit Federal payments to a unit of local government that allows 

individuals who are not citizens of the United States to vote in elections 

for State or local office, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. 

HICE of Georgia, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. POSEY, Mr. MEADOWS, and Mr. 

WEBER of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal payments to a unit of local government 

that allows individuals who are not citizens of the United 

States to vote in elections for State or local office, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating Foreign 

5 Intervention in Elections Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 151 IH

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL PAYMENT RESTRICTION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds made available 

3 in any Act may be used to make payments to any unit 

4 of local government that permits individuals who are not 

5 citizens of the United States to vote in elections for State 

6 or local office. 

7 (b) PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION BY CENSUS RE8 QUIRED.—The Bureau of the Census shall collect and 

9 publish information on any State or local government that 

10 allows non-citizens to vote. 

11 (c) APPLICABILITY.—The requirements of this sec12 tion shall only apply with respect to any contract entered 

13 into or grant made on or after the date of the enactment 

14 of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[Cite as State v. Dudas , 2022-Ohio-931.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110573

v. : MICHAEL DUDAS, : Defendant-Appellant. :

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: March 24, 2022

Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-20-650250-A

Appearances: Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Anna Faraglia and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee

. Edward M. Heindel, for appellant

. EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J.: Defendant-appellant Michael Dudas pled guilty to one count of aggravated murder (an unclassified felony), one count of aggravated robbery (a firstdegree felony) and two counts of misuse of a credit card (a fifth-degree felony). The trial court imposed a sentence of 25 years to life on the aggravated murder count, anindefinite sentence of three to four-and-a-half years on the aggravated robbery count (to be served consecutively to the sentence on the aggravated murder count) and one year each on the misuse of a credit card counts (to be served concurrently to each other and concurrently with the sentences on the other counts). Dudas appeals his sentence on the aggravated robbery count, arguing that the indefinite sentence, imposed under the Reagan Tokes Law, is unconstitutional. He raises the following three assignments of error for review: Assignment of Error No. 1: The Reagan Tokes Act is unconstitutional because it violates the Due Process Clauses of the United States and Ohio Constitutions. Assignment of Error No. 2: The Reagan Tokes Act is unconstitutional because it violates the separation of powers doctrine embodied in the Ohio Constitution. Assignment of Error No. 3: The Reagan Tokes Act is unconstitutional because it violates the right to jury trial as guaranteed by the United States and Ohio Constitutions. The arguments presented in this case do not present novel issues or any new theory challenging the constitutional validity of any aspect of the Reagan Tokes Law left unaddressed by this court’s en banc decision in State v. Delvallie , 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022-Ohio-470. Accordingly, pursuant to Delvallie , we overrule Dudas’ assignments of error. Judgment affirmed. It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant the costs herein taxed. The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas to carry this judgment into execution. The defendant’s convictions having been affirmed, any bail pending appeal is

terminated. A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, JUDGE

FRANK DANIEL CELEBREZZE, III, P.J., and LISA B. FORBES, J., CONCUR

N.B. Judge Lisa B. Forbes is constrained to apply Delvallie . For a full explanation,

see State v. Delvallie , 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022-Ohio-470 (Forbes, J., dissenting).
# Illinois_county_differentials_2
21312

#### State v. Kagoshima

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       8,508,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,827,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                    78,700
<INVENTORY>                                  5,795,009
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,265,536
<PP&E>                                       1,857,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                 793,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,817,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,608,930
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       175,626
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,962,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,817,938
<SALES>                                      7,142,501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,142,501
<CGS>                                        1,967,196
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,612,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,530,150
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,290,870
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,239,280
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,239,280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        
                                

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Briggs & Stratton Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John S. Shiely, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofmy knowledge:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ John S. Shiely      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| John S. Shiely          |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| August 30, 2007         |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
M13003

Part II, Section B – Industrial Sites Controlled by Others a. Operation Description b. Worker Exposure / Environmental Release



## CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED