alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-60104

Summary Calendar

Heidy Carolina Morales-Sanchez, 

Petitioner,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A206 723 054

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Petitioner Heidy Carolina Morales-Sanchez is a native and citizen of 

Honduras. She seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal of the immigration judge’s (IJ) order 

denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 5, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-60104 Document: 00516381194 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/05/2022
No. 21-60104

2

the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We review only the BIA’s decision 

except to the extent that the IJ’s ruling influences the BIA. Singh v. Sessions, 

880 F.3d 220, 224 (5th Cir. 2018). 

Morales-Sanchez incorrectly asserts that “it is undisputed” that she 

is “a member of a group recognized by the Los Olanchanos gang, i.e., persons 

with information concerning crimes that the Los Olanchanos gang 

committed, who pass that information on.” Whether Morales-Sanchez 

identified a cognizable particular social group (PSG) was very much disputed 

and was the basis for the IJ’s conclusion that Morales-Sanchez was not 

entitled to asylum or withholding of removal. See Orellana-Monson v. Holder,

685 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir. 2012). Her failure to challenge the adverse PSG 

determination abandons any challenge to it. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 

830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003). We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction MoralesSanchez’s newly raised claim that she is entitled to asylum based on her 

“anti-gang political opinion.” Omari v. Holder, 562 F.3d 314, 321 (5th Cir. 

2009). Substantial evidence thus supports the BIA’s conclusion that 

Morales-Sanchez failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear,

or more-likely-than-not probability, of future prosecution on account of a 

protected ground. See Zhang v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). 

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s conclusion that MoralesSanchez was not entitled to relief under the CAT. See id. She fails to cite any 

evidence that compels a conclusion contrary to that of the IJ that she failed 

to establish the state action required to obtain relief under the CAT. See 

Tabora Gutierrez v. Garland, 12 F.4th 496, 502-03 (5th Cir. 2021); TamaraGomez v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 343, 351 (5th Cir. 2006). 

Morales-Sanchez’s petition is DENIED IN PART and 

DISMISSED IN PART for lack of jurisdiction. 

Case: 21-60104 Document: 00516381194 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/05/2022
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00178-CR

DERECK JAMISON SMITH APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Dereck Jamison Smith entered an open plea of guilty to burglary 

of a habitation with intent to commit aggravated robbery and pleaded true to a 

prior felony conviction alleged in the repeat offender notice. The trial court 

sentenced Smith to thirty years’ confinement at the conclusion of the punishment 

hearing. Smith’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to 

withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel avers that in 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

his professional opinion, the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief and motion meet 

the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation 

of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. See

386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). This court informed Smith that he could file 

a pro se brief, but he did not do so. The State did not submit a brief.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this 

court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State,

904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may 

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–

83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with 

counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in 

the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 

S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 

684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to 

withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

BILL MEIER

JUSTICE
3

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; MEIER and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 15, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harpreet S. Sangha, the Chief Executive Officer of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. (the "Company"), and Sylvia Tang, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | "Harpreet S. Sangha"Harpreet S. SanghaPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and a director 
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date:  January 20, 2009
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | "Sylvia Tang"Sylvia Tang
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date:  January 20, 2009                                                             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply550Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  George Barnard... (not verified)PermalinkMarch 18, 2017 - 10:13pmThe Capitol dome appears on TV news shows all the time so we've followed the restoration work. It has turned out beautifully; looking markedly better. Well done! Thank you for your work.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Publication of the tier 2 tax rates for calendar year 2024 as required by section 3241(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. Tier 2 taxes on railroad employees, employers, and employee representatives are one source of funding for benefits under the Railroad Retirement Act.

# DATES:

The tier 2 tax rates for calendar year 2024 apply to compensation paid in calendar year 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathleen Edmondson, CC:EEE:EOET:ET1, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224, Telephone Number (202) 317-6798 (not a toll-free number).

*Tier 2 Tax Rates:*                         The tier 2 tax rate for 2024 under section 3201(b) on employees is 4.9 percent of compensation. The tier 2 tax rate for 2024 under section 3221(b) on employers is 13.1 percent of compensation. The tier 2 tax rate for 2024 under section 3211(b) on employee representatives is 13.1 percent of compensation.                    

Rachel D Levy,

Associate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations and Employment Taxes).

[FR Doc. 2023-26101 Filed 11-27-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 993 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 993

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the limitation on the 
number of veterans authorized to be enrolled in programs of independent 
    living services and assistance administered by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2015

Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico (for herself, Ms. Tsongas, Mr. 
   Cartwright, and Mr. Ben Ray Lujaan of New Mexico) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the limitation on the 
number of veterans authorized to be enrolled in programs of independent 
    living services and assistance administered by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Independent Living 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF VETERANS ENROLLED IN PROGRAMS 
              OF INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE 
              ADMINISTERED BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 3120 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (e); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (e).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (a) of such section is 
amended by striking ``subsection (f)'' and inserting ``subsection 
(e)''.
    (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 60 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House 
of Representatives a plan to educate employees of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs whose responsibilities relate to vocational 
rehabilitation counseling or employment counseling about the benefits 
and appropriate use of the independent living services provided under 
section 3120 of title 38, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

ARTMFNTOF 

;nv !0 P 2^ 5b 

Motion of 

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedule B-7) 

DOT-OST-1995-569 

MOTION OF AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT XJNDER RULE 12 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to; 

DANIEL P. CARTON 

President 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc. 

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5494 

DFW Airport, Texas 75261 

KATHLEEN SOLED 

Vice President & General Counsel 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc. 

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5494 

DFW Airport, Texas 75261 

(817) 967-1574 

kate. soled(3aa . com 

CARL B. NELSON 

Associate General Counsel 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 496-5647 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

November 14, 2011 
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

Motion of 

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedule B-7) 

DOT-OST-1995-569 

MOTION OF AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, 

hereby moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 3Q2011 be 

accorded confidential treatment and be withheld from public 

disclosure. The information for which confidential treatment 

is requested pertains to American Eagle's airframes and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. 

In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 

41582, we are uploading our confidential report electronically 

to the following website: http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov 

On June 5, 1995, James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of 

Airline Statistics, the Department granted confidential treatment for a 10-year period to similar data filed by American 

Airlines. For the reasons stated in Mr. Mitchell's letter, the 

Department should grant the same relief here. 
- 2 -

WHEREFORE, American Eagle moves that its B-7 for 3Q2011 

be withheld from public disclosure under Rule 12 for a period 

of 10 years. 

Respectfully submitted. 

GMM StL^ 

CARL B. NELSON 

Associate General Counsel 

American Airlines, Inc. 

On behalf of American Eagle 

Airlines, Inc. 

November 14, 2011
September 18 , 2014

By Email

Mr. Robert Fin amore

Division Chief

Foreign Air Carrier Licensing

U.S. Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Application of Aeroenlaces Nacionales, S.A . de C.V. (d/b/a vivaAerobus) for

an Exemption and Amendment to Permit for GDL/DFW, CUN/DFW,

MTY/DFW, SJD/DFW ( DOT

- OST

- 2014

- 0160 )

Dear Mr. Fin amore

,

vivaAerobus has completed its poll of the U.S. carrier s served with its application of

September 11 , 20 14 for an exemption and amendment to foreign air carrier permit pursuant

to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 for service between Guadalajara, Cancun, Monterrey and San Jose del

Cabo , Mexico on the one hand and Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas on the other.

vivaAerobus receive d non

- objections from each of the carrier s served. We request

expedited approval of our application

.

Respectfully submitted

,

David M. Kirstein

cc: Service List ; David Christofano
104 P.3d 354

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### Mizukami v. Mizukami

25928

09/23/2004

Denied
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0470 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2010-NM-190-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FIVE

PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS ACT

PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS ACT

TITLE II

APPLICABILITY OF THE ACTS OF THE INSTITUTIONS

APPLICABILITY OF THE ACTS OF THE INSTITUTIONS

Article 51

Unless otherwise stipulated in this Act, the Council, acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt the necessary measures to implement the provisions of this Act.

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.9
  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
    CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CILCORP INC.
    (required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
    Form 10-K
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e))
  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared; b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and    a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 1,
    2007
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Finlay Enterprises, Inc., (the "Company") does hereby certify with
respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
July 31, 2004 (the "Report") that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: September 9, 2004
                                       /s/ Arthur E. Reiner
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Arthur E. Reiner
                                       Chairman, President and Chief
                                       Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
```
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

AUGUST 10, 2015 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b). 

1. Case No. SD33500 

 Re: VICTOR A. SMITH, 

 Appellant, 

 vs. 

 STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Respondent.