alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of aeroTelesis, Inc. on
      Form
      10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the SEC on the
      date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      each
      of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:July
                13, 2006By:
            */s/* *Joseph
              Gutierrez*Name:
                Joseph Gutierrez
              Title:
                  President and Chief Financial
                  Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to aeroTelesis, Inc. and will be retained
      by
      aeroTelesis, Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its Staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of AFG Investment Trust B (the
"Trust"),  on  Form  10-Q  for  the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  the  Principal  Executive Officer of the Trust's Managing Trustee,
hereby  certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:
(1)     the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and
(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of the Trust.

                    /s/  Gary  D.  Engle
                    --------------------
                    Gary  D.  Engle
President  of  AFG  ASIT  Corporation,  the  Managing  Trustee  of  the  Trust
(Principal  Executive  Officer)
                    August  19,  2002
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 892 

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to prohibit the paying of premium 

subsidies on policies based on the actual market price of an agricultural 

commodity at the time of harvest. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2015 

Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to prohibit the 

paying of premium subsidies on policies based on the 

actual market price of an agricultural commodity at the 

time of harvest. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Harvest Price Subsidy 

5 Reduction Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 892 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PREMIUM SUBSIDY FOR HARVEST 

2 PRICE POLICIES. 

3 Section 508(e) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 

4 U.S.C. 1508(e)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(9) PROHIBITION ON PREMIUM SUBSIDY FOR

7 HARVEST PRICE POLICIES.—Notwithstanding any 

8 other provision of law and beginning with the 2016 

9 reinsurance year, the Corporation may not pay any 

10 amount of premium subsidy in the case of a policy 

11 or plan of insurance that is based on the actual mar12 ket price of an agricultural commodity at the time 

13 of harvest.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Pierre Charles L'Enfant Portrait
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1974

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

Pierre Charles L'Enfant designed the new federal city, Washington, D.C.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. Cox first executed the murals in the eastern north-south corridor, starting work in 1973 and finishing in 1974. Portraits of the nine men who served as Architect of the Capitol between 1793 and 1974 decorate the groined vaults of the ceilings. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of-- ) 

) 

G & C Enterprises, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. DAHA28-94-C-OOO 1 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 56572 

Paul T. DeVlieger, Esq. 

De Vlieger Hilser P .C. 

Philadelphia, P A 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

CPT Michael E. Barnicle, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The appeal has been settled. Pursuant to the parties' 15 January 2014 motion, the 

appeal is dismissed from the Board's docket with prejudice, subject to reinstatement only 

in the event that the settlement payment is not consummated within 60 days from the date 

of this order. Any motion to reinstate must be filed with the Board by 22 July 2014. 

Dated: 23 January 2014 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 56572, Appeal of G & C Enterprises, 

Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60036

Summary Calendar

ALVARO E LEON,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., US ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A70 674 750

Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alvaro E. Leon, petitions for review of a final order of removal of the Board

of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that adopted and affirmed the determination that

he was removable because he remained in the United States without

authorization and because his prior conviction for attempted indecency with a

child was a crime involving moral turpitude and an aggravated felony. An

immigration judge (IJ) further determined that, because of his prior conviction,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 25, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60036

2

Leon was statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal, special rule

cancellation of removal under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American

Relief Act (NACARA), asylum, and voluntary departure. The IJ also denied

Leon’s requests for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention

Against Torture (CAT) on the ground that he failed to satisfy the standards for

obtaining relief.

Leon does not address the IJ’s determination that he was statutorily

ineligible for cancellation of removal, special rule cancellation of removal under

NACARA, asylum, and voluntary departure because of his prior aggravated

felony conviction, or challenge the IJ’s denial of CAT relief. Moreover, he did not

raise these claims before the BIA. Accordingly, he has waived them. See Thuri

v. Ashcroft, 380 F.3d 788, 793 (5th Cir. 2004); Wang v. Ashcroft, 260 F.3d 448,

452-53 (5th Cir. 2001).

Leon argues that the IJ and the BIA erroneously denied his claim for

withholding of removal because he demonstrated past persecution and a

well-founded fear of persecution in El Salvador. He argues that his testimony

established that he was a member of a particular social group and that he was,

and would be, specifically targeted for persecution if he returned to El Salvador.

This court generally lacks jurisdiction to review a final order of removal

of an alien, such as Leon, who has been convicted of an aggravated felony. See

8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C). However, the court retains jurisdiction over

constitutional claims or questions of law. § 1252(a)(2)(D); see Rodriguez-Castro

v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 316, 319 (5th Cir. 2005). Leon’s arguments do not raise

questions of law or constitutional claims. See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906

(5th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, there is no jurisdiction to review Leon’s

withholding of removal claim. See § 1252(a)(2)(C). Because we lack jurisdiction

over the final order of removal, the petition for review is DISMISSED.
# L_2014211EN.01004701.xml

| 17.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/47

---

Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 107/2001 of 28 September 2001 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 322 of 6 December 2001
  )

On page 15, point 2 of Article 1 shall be replaced by the following:

| ‘2. | The text of adaptation (a) shall be replaced by the following:

  “The following shall be added to Article 5(3):






  — | in Icelandic “geislað” or “meðhöndlað með jónandi geislun”, |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘2.

The text of adaptation (a) shall be replaced by the following:

“The following shall be added to Article 5(3):

—

in Icelandic “geislað” or “meðhöndlað með jónandi geislun”,

| — | in Norwegian “bestrålt” or “behandlet med ioniserende stråling”
  ”.’ |
| --- | --- |

—

in Norwegian “bestrålt” or “behandlet med ioniserende stråling”
  ”.’

---
18835

#### State v. Girty

Affirmed
**Exhibit 31.1** **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, David H. Murdock, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive    Officer, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K    of Dole Food Company, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  David    H. Murdock    David H. Murdock*Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*     March 23, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains  summary  information  extracted from the financial
statements  contained in  Intelligent  Decision  Systems,  Inc.'s Report on Form
10-QSB  for the six months  ended  December  31,  1997 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              23,895
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      332,857
<ALLOWANCES>                                        16,598
<INVENTORY>                                         70,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   555,377
<PP&E>                                             786,217
<DEPRECIATION>                                     481,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,397,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,421,648
<BONDS>                                            185,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        13,577,832
<OTHER-SE>                                     (13,788,153)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,397,122
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   378,140
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      415,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,723,471
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 315,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,093,569)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,093,569)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,093,569)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.14)
        


</TABLE>
Order entered August 17 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00666
- CV
RYAN STANCU , Appellant

V. SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY , Appellee On Appeal from the 10 1st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 20
- 14134

O RDER Although the reporter’s record has not been filed, appellant has filed his brief on the merits. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal be submitted without the reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c). Appellant’ s brief is deficient in that it fails to include : (1) a table of contents with references to the pages of the brief; (2) an index of authorities arranged alphabetically and indicating the pages of the brief where the authorities are cited; (3) issues presented for review; (4) a statement of facts supported by recordreferences; and (5) clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with

appropriate citations to the record

. See id . 38.1(b), (c), (f), (g ) & ( i). A ccordingly

a ppellant shall file an amended brief correcting the noted deficiencies within ten days of the date of this order. Failure to file an amended brief will result in the appeal being submitted with the deficient brief.
/s/ ROBERT D. BUR NS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Baltimore, 1776
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1974

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

The Congress moved to Baltimore, Maryland, a safer haven during the war than Philadelphia, after the Declaration of Independence. It met in this rented building, since known as Old Congress House; the building was destroyed by fire in 1860.

About the Cox Corridors Murals

The first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. Cox first executed the murals in the eastern north-south corridor, starting work in 1973 and finishing in 1974. This corridor has been termed the Hall of Capitols because it features paintings of 16 different buildings that housed the Continental and United States Congresses from 1754 to 1865. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR 8-HOUR OZONE RACT SIP SUBMITTAL 

Planning Area: El Dorado County Air Quality Management District 

Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V – 

Criteria for Determining the Completeness 

of Plan Submissions 

Enclosed Notes 

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS 

2.1(a) Submittal Letter from Governor's 

Designee X See ARB Executive Order G-125-346. 

2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption X 

See El Dorado County Air Quality 

Management District Board Resolution 

No. 016-2007 as certified by Board 

Clerk. 

2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation X See ARB Executive Order G-125-346. 

2.1(d) Copy of : 

a. Attainment Plan 

b: Contingency Measures 

 Not applicable 

2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's 

Procedural Requirements X 

See El Dorado County Air Quality 

Management District Board Resolution 

No. 016-2007 as certified by Board 

Clerk and ARB Executive Order G-125-

346. 

2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 

40 CFR part 51.102 X See attachment three of the District submittal. 

2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in 

Accordance with Notice X See attachment three of the District submittal. 

2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and 

Responses There were no comments. 

2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant Not applicable. 

2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status Not applicable. 

2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissions Not applicable. 

2.2(d) Demonstration that Plan 

Approval/Implementation Protects 

NAAQS 

 Not applicable. 

2.2(e) Modeling Support Not applicable. 

2.2(f)- Compliance/Enforcement and 

2.2(i) Justification Not applicable.
Corrections to “Transcript of ECI/NTSB/FAA Meeting.” Dated February 14, 2013, Job No. 15494

Page #Line #Change From Change To 2 7 b Harman Harmon 2 7 b Keuthe Kuethe 2 9 a NASH Nash 3 25 Bryonn Bryon 12 1 regarding the regarding how the 12 14 ACE AEC 15 19 ADEs ADs 15 25 ADEs ADs 16 15 ADE AD 34 13 bit fit 45 10 CHD CHT 47 19 Rimasen Rumizen 51 11 problems probes 57 3 orig dimen original dimensions 72 22 Brawley Braly 76 4 talking talk 95 5 8,000 8 thousandths 103 16 operates operators 112 13 Alcar Alcor 112 14 ETT EGT 112 15 Hunt there Hundere 11425 TO TBO 13013 issue issued 14016 reelevated reevaluated
27580

#### Hamilton ex rel. Lethem v. Lethem

Vacated and Remanded