alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2386Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Karen Hyland (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 16, 2021 - 4:56amThank you for taking care of our Capitol.❤️
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE IV

OTHER PROVISIONS

OTHER PROVISIONS

Article 44

The Commission may take all appropriate measures to ensure that the necessary statutory staff is maintained in Croatia for a maximum of 18 months following accession. During this period, officials, temporary staff and contract staff assigned to posts in Croatia before accession and who are required to remain in service in Croatia after the date of accession shall benefit from the same financial and material conditions as were applied before accession in accordance with the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities laid down in Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1). The administrative expenditure, including salaries for other necessary staff, shall be covered by the general budget of the European Union.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.

1

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

HOWARD M. TALENFELD and JULIE ZOBEL TALENFELD
, Appellant s ,

v.

ROBINETTE HOMES SIGNATURE SERIES, INC.
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1748

[ March 29, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Marina Garcia

- Wood , Judge; L.T. Case No. 16

- 001758 CACE (18)

.

Mark B. Schorr of Mark B. Schorr, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

C. Cory Mauro of Mauro Law P.A., Boca Raton; and William Sklar of

Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, C ONNER

, JJ., and R OBERTS

, K ATHLEEN H ., Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
M E M O R A N D U M 

To: File 

From: John Ungvarsky, EPA Region IX, Air Planning Office

Date: January 28, 2013

Concerning: Conclusion that the Maintenance Demonstration Does Not Rely on Implementation of 

Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR) 

_____________________________

On January 17, 2013, John Ungvarsky sent an email to Charles Anderson, Sacramento Metropolitan Air 

Quality Management District, asking if there was language in the Sacramento PM10 Maintenance Plan

that concluded that the maintenance demonstration does not rely on implementation of nonattainment 

NSR because the plan applies standard growth factors to stationary source emissions and does not rely 

on NSR offsets to reduce the rate of increase in emissions over time from point sources. 

On January 22, 2013, Charles Anderson called John Ungvarsky to confirm that, although the Plan does

not contain the aforementioned language, the above statement is correct. Specifically, the maintenance 

demonstration in the Sacramento PM10 Maintenance Plan does not rely on implementation of 

nonattainment NSR because the plan applies standard growth factors to stationary source emissions 

and does not rely on NSR offsets to reduce the rate of increase in emissions over time from point 

sources.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 235

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 984 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the 

Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study on the 

feasibility of designating the Chief Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 984 EH

1 SECTION 1. CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HISTORIC 

2 TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY. 

3 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(46) CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HIS7 TORIC TRAIL.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Chief Standing 

9 Bear Trail, extending approximately 550 miles 

10 from Niobrara, Nebraska, to Ponca City, Okla11 homa, which follows the route taken by Chief 

12 Standing Bear and the Ponca people during 

13 Federal Indian removal, and approximately 550 

14 miles from Ponca City, Oklahoma, through 

15 Omaha, Nebraska, to Niobrara, Nebraska, 

16 which follows the return route taken by Chief 

17 Standing Bear and the Ponca people, as gen18 erally depicted on the map entitled ‘Chief 

19 Standing Bear National Historic Trail Feasi20 bility Study’, numbered 903/125,630, and dated 

21 November 2014. 

22 ‘‘(B) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map 

23 described in subparagraph (A) shall be on file 

24 and available for public inspection in the appro25 priate offices of the Department of the Interior. 
3 

•HR 984 EH

1 ‘‘(C) COMPONENTS.—The feasibility study 

2 conducted under subparagraph (A) shall include 

3 a determination on whether the Chief Standing 

4 Bear Trail meets the criteria described in sub5 section (b) for designation as a national historic 

6 trail. 

7 ‘‘(D) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting 

8 the feasibility study under subparagraph (A), 

9 the Secretary of the Interior shall consider 

10 input from owners of private land within or ad11 jacent to the study area.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 984 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct 

purposes. ing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other on the feasibility of designating the Chief Standthe Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-2304

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jakheeno Stewart

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

 Submitted: March 9, 2018

 Filed: March 14, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Jakheeno Stewart appeals from the sentence imposed by the District Court

1

after he pleaded guilty to a gun charge. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has

The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas.
submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), questioning the

reasonableness of Stewart’s sentence. 

After review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an

unreasonable sentence. There was no indication that it overlooked a relevant 18

U.S.C. § 3553 factor or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant

factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) (standard of review). We

have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988),

and we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We affirm the sentence and grant

counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ RONNIE BURNETT,

Claimant

- Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2022

- 1572

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 20

- 1524, Chief Judge Margaret C. Bartley, Judge Coral Wong Pietsch, Judge Grant Jaquith.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENNETH M. C ARPENTER , Law Offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, for claimant

- appellant.

M ATTHEW J UDE C ARHART , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department o f Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent

- appellee. Also represented by B RIAN M. B OYNTON , E LIZABETH M ARIE H OSFORD , P ATRICIA M. M C C ARTHY ; J ONATHAN K RISCH , Y. K EN L EE , Case: 22-1572 Document: 31 Page: 1 Filed: 06/07/2023Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Washington, DC.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE , Chief Judge

, S TOLL and C UNNINGHAM , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

June 7, 2023 Date /s/ Jar r ett B. Perlow Jar rett B. Perlow Acting Clerk of Court Case: 22-1572 Document: 31 Page: 2 Filed: 06/07/2023
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF**

** **

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

** **

**OF**

** **

**AMERIVISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC.**

 

 

I, Randall W. Muth, Vice-President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Amerivision Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that, to the best of my knowledge, the quarterly report of the Companyon Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 003, (the “Report):

 

a.                                       Complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and that

 

b.                                      The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company at June 30, 2003, and the results of theCompany’s operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003.

 
|            |   |   |   |   |                                        |
|-----------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
| August 14, 2003 |   |   |   |   | /s/ Randall W. Muth                         |
|            |   |   |   |   | RANDALL W. MUTH                             |
|            |   |   |   |   | Vice-President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       7,452,485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  175,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,682,225
<PP&E>                                      18,841,479
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,942,792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,526,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          495,222
<BONDS>                                        938,379
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,093,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,526,912
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,365,987
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,246,737
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,058,168
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,058,168
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,058,168
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016202EN.01039401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/394 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/394

---

Article 4

Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

---
# --~=;:~GI;ir:Jljf

# MethOdS The Exclusive Airborne Health care company ... Since 1980

August 9, 2013 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590-0001 Subject: Notice OfProposed Rule Making Docket No. FAA-2013-0526 Air Methods Corporation Denver/Centennial Airport**NASDAp[~MS:AIRM** (**~;;. ~:·** **~** ···•··

.f)

.o•: .• l.:
..} (f:;

Air Methods Corporation has review the Notice ofProposed Rule Making (NPRM) concerning the Bell Model 206L-4 and 407 helicopters requiring replacing or reworking certain aft bearing caps. This NPRM shows applicability per Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletins No. 206L-04-129 and 407-04-66, both Rev. A. Compliance with these ASB's has been previously documented on the Component History Card for the Freewheel Assemblies. Air Methods requests that a provision be included in the Airworthiness Directive to allow compliance byperfoiming a Records Research. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this pending rule making action. Ifyou })ave any**que~tions** please contact me at 303-749-1336.

. . 

## .

# ~~~ !-yri M.**S~o rt**  . , , .. Director.ofEngineering arid Reliability Cc: Archie Gray Chris Meinhardt**~,** ·' -:-- ·• r '· • .'**~-1.'** I; ,' ·'.**~** • t •.•

•**~** : I I,
,.

d IJS/>. 80,,2 • 303-792-7400 • FAX 303-792-7568 

### o 

### ·a E.nglewood, Colora o, 

# no\ soutn reon •
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 16, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00900-CV DOMANCIO CASTILLO, Appellant V. SAVING GRACE #22 LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02837-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Carlyle, and Smith Opinion by Justice Smith Appellant’s brief in this case is over due. By postcard da ted June 2, 2023 we
informed appellant his brief wa s overdue and directed him to file his brief within ten
days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of
this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed his brief or
otherwise corresponded with th e Court regarding the status of this appeal.–2– We dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

220900F.P05 /Craig Smith / CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

DOMANCIO CASTILLO, Appellant

No. 05-22-00900-CV V.

SAVING GRACE #22 LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02837- A. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Molberg and Carlyle participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opini on of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered August 16, 2023
#### CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. NORTHERN CORPORATION, Appellee. NORTHERN CORPORATION, Cross-Appellant, v. CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 2779, 2891.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

May 20, 1977.

Sanford M. Gibbs, Hagans, Smith & Brown, Anchorage, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Donna C. Willard, Richmond, Willoughby & Willard, Anchorage, Bruce T. Rinker, De-Garmo, Leedy, Oles & Morrison, Seattle, Wash., and Peter B. Walton, Anchorage, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Before BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice, and RABINOWITZ, CONNOR and BURKE, Justices.

OPINION ON REHEARING

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

Cross-appellant Northern Corporation has filed a petition for rehearing in this matter contending that it should be granted rehearing on the issue of damages sustained because Chugach allegedly required it to remain in readiness to perform.1 Our study of the petition has not persuaded us to modify our decision in this matter.

Northern’s 14th point in its cross-appeal reads:

> The trial court erred in not concluding that Northern Corporation kept its equip*884ment on the job site throughout the summer and fall of 1967 only as a result of the insistence of Chugach Electric.

However, Northern’s brief does not discuss this point.2 Our prior decisions have held that either cursory treatment of, or failure to argue, a point on appeal constitutes an abandonment of the particular point in question. *See, e. g., Kenai Power Corp. v. Strandberg,*415 P.2d 659, 660 (Alaska 1966); *DeArmond v. Alaska State Development Corp.,*376 P.2d 717, 725 (Alaska 1962); *Veal v. Newlin, Inc.,*367 P.2d 155, 156 (Alaska 1961).

ERWIN, Justice, not participating.

1

. *See Chugach Elec. Ass’n v. Northern Corp.,*562 P.2d 1053, Opinion No. 1408 (Alaska 1977).

2

. Northern’s brief asserts that damages were erroneously computed, however, not for this particular reason.
Order filed May 17, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-12-00332-CR

____________

AUSTIN TAYLOR PROFFITT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1242691

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed May 10, 2012. 

Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s 

record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the trial court’s 

judgment.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on 

or before May 30, 2012, containing the trial court’s judgment.
2

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a 

part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of the Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Michael S. Sarner, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:





1The Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2019, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2019 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.





Date:  June 4, 2019By:/s/ Michael S. SarnerMichael S. SarnerChief Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 22004D0028 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22004D0028

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 28/2004 of 19 March 2004 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 127 , 29/04/2004 P. 0136 - 0136 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 28/2004

of 19 March 2004

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 10/2003 of 31 January 2003(1).

(2) Commission Decision 2003/641/EC of 5 September 2003 on the use of colour photographs or other illustrations as health warnings on tobacco packages(2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 3 (Directive 2001/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XXV of Annex II to the Agreement:

"4. 32003 D 0641: Commission Decision 2003/641/EC of 5 September 2003 on the use of colour photographs or other illustrations as health warnings on tobacco packages (OJ L 226, 10.9.2003, p. 24)."

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2003/641/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 20 March 2004, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(3).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 19 March 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

P. Westerlund

(1) OJ L 94, 10.4.2003, p. 61.

(2) OJ L 226, 10.9.2003, p. 24.

(3) No constitutional requirements indicated.