### 1 **Statement Supporting the Renewal of the Information Collection**  **Request for**  **Emergency Planning and Release Notification**  **Requirements 1.**  **IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION 1(a)**  **Title of the Information Collection** Emergency Planning and Release Notification Requirements (EPCRA Sections 302, 303, and 304) (Renewal)

- EPA No. 1395.0 9 , 2050
- 0092
. **1(b) Short Characterization**  This information collection request (ICR) was previously approved as OMB No. 2050

- 0092 through December 31, 20 1 5 . The Emergency Planning and Community Right

-to - Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) establishes authorities for emergency planning and preparedness, emergency release notification reporting, community right

-to - know reporting, and toxic chemical rel ease reporting. Under the emergency planning provisions of EPCRA, codified in 40 C FR part 355 requires any facility where an extremely hazardous substance (EHS) is present in an amount at or in excess of the threshold planning quantity (TPQ) to notify the state emergency response commission (SERC) and local emergency planning committee (LEPC) by May 17, 1987. This activity has been completed; the section 302 costs and burden hours for this ICR, therefore, reflect only the estimate of the cost and burden incurred by new facilities that have an EHS in excess of the TPQ during the period covered by this ICR. EPC R A s ection 303 requires LEPCs to prepare emergency plans for facilities that have EHSs in excess of the TPQs in their local planning district. F acilities are required to provide local planners with information necessary for the preparation of emergency plans. In addition, the facilities are required to inform LEPCs of any relevant changes in chemi cal use or production that may a ffect the emergenc y plans. Section 303 requires LEPCs to complete their emergency plans by October 17, 1988. This ICR therefore reflects the costs attributable to the requirement of annually updating the local emergency response plans required under section 303(a)
. Emergency release notification provisions under EPCRA section 304, codified in 40 CFR part 355 requires facilities to report to SERCs and LEPCs releases in excess of quantities established by EPA. Facilities are required to report releases above the reportable quantity (RQ) of any EHS or hazardous substance defined under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) section 101. Notice of release must be given to both the LEPC and SERC. In addition, facilities must provide a written follow

-up report providing additional information on the release, its impacts, and any actions taken in response. EPA estimates that 95,000 facilities ( 23,750 manufacturers and 71,250 non - manufacturers) are subject to reporting under EPCRA section 302 and 3, 5 56 SERCs and LEPCs are subject to section 303. EPA estimates that approximately 1 0 ,00 0 release notifications are made annually under section 304 to the SERC and LEPC
. The total burden to facilities over the three year information collection period is estimated to be 4 36,500 hours for three years ( 1 45,500 hours annually) , at a cost of $ 27. 3 million $( 9.1 million annually) , with an associated state and local burden of 32 9 , 8 68 hours for three years ( 10 9 , 9 56 hours annually) , at a cost of $ 1 5
. 0 million for three years (4. 4 million annually).

### 2

**2. NEED**  **FOR AND**  **USE OF**  **THE COLLECTION**  **2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  The authority for these requirements is EPCRA sections 302, 303, and 304 (42 U.S.C. 11002, 11003, and 11004). Section 302 of EPCRA required the EHS list to be "the same list as the list published in November 1985 by the Administrator in Appendix A of the `Chemical Emergency Preparedness Program Interim Guidance'." The section further required EPA to "publish an interim final regulation establishing a threshold planning quantity for each substance on the list..." If EPA failed to publish the interim final rule, "the threshold planning quantity for the substance shall be 2 pounds until such time as the Administrator publishes regulations establishing a threshold for the substance." The interim final rule was published in the Federal Register on November 17, 1986 (51 FR 41570), followed by a final rule published on April 22, 1987 (52 FR 13378). The EHS list consisted at that time of 406 chemicals, and the TPQs ranged from one pound to ten thousand pounds. There are currently 355 chemicals on the EHS list. The EHS list along with the TPQs is used to designate facilities for initial screening for the local emergenc y planning process. Section 303 of EPCRA requires facilities that have to provide the notification under section 302 to designate a facility coordinator to the LEPC and to "promptly provide information to [the LEPC] necessary for developing and implementing the emergency plan." In this manner, the LEPC determines the potential scope of a response and, therefore, the amount of effort necessary for emergency planning. The LEPC will review its plan annually and incorporate any changes or additions. These e mergency plans increase the local response and preparedness capability by allowing local planners to work with industry in their community, to determine the level of preparedness necessary for a response if a release should occur. Under section 304, respondents are required to notify the LEPC and SERC of releases of EHSs or hazardous substances (as identified under CERCLA) above the reportable quantity. The purpose of the reporting is to allow response agencies to determine whether their assistance is nee ded in handling the response action. The facility must provide a written follow

-up report. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data**  The information provided by facilities under sections 302, 303, and 304 is provided to the SERCs and LEPCs. Individuals can obtain the information by contacting the SERCs and LEPCs. The information provided under sections 302 and 303 is used to increase the community's level of preparedness to respond to releases of chemicals in their community. The information is also made available to the public to allow individuals to practice their "right

-to - know" about the hazards posed by chemicals in their community. The information provided under section 304 is the trigger to activate the community's chemical emergency response sy stem. The written follow

-up report is to update and clarify the information provided in the initial call. It is also made available to the public so that the community can understand what happened during the release.

### 3

**3. NON**  **- DUPLICATION,**  **CONSULTATIONS, A** **ND OTHER**  **COLLECTION CRITERIA**  **3(a) Non**  **- Duplication**  Currently, there are no federal reporting requirements comparable to sections 302, 303, and 304 of EPCRA. Release reporting under CERCLA section 103 is an emergency notification to the National Response Center (NRC), while release reporting under section 304 is directly to local and state entities. The follow

-up report required under section 304 is also unique. **3(b) Consultations**  EPA contacted the following facilities to develop an estimate for the burden for section 304 reporting. The representatives were asked to estimate the time it took make their notifications to the SERC and LEPC. The burden associated with notifying NRC is accounted in ICR 1049.13. In addition, if their release(s) required an EPCRCA section 304 follow

-up report, an estimate of the effort required to produce that report. Hancock Foods Louisville Gas and Electric Hancock NE Louisville KY A. Duda & Sons, Inc. Georgia Pacific Consumer Products Belle Glades FL Crossett AR Linde LLC Hill AFB Environmental Division Richmond CA Hill AFB UT Shasta Beverages Denver Cold Storage Inc. Miami FL Denver PA **3(c) Public Notice**  In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq
. ), the Agency notified the public through a Federal Register notice on the re

- submission of this ICR on Ju ne 19, 201 5 ( 80 FR 35347 ). EPA did not receive any comments. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection**  The reporting deadlines for sections 302, 303, and 304 are set by statute. EPA has no authority to allow less frequent collection. **3(e) General Guidelines**  The collection activities specified in this renewal ICR adhere to the guidelines specified by OMB. **3(f) Confidentiality**  The respondent may claim specific chemical identities as trade secret in the notification to LEPC on information for developing and implementing the emergency response plan, under Section 303(d)(2)

### 4

and (d)(3). Such information must be submitted according to EPCRA sections 322 and 323 (40 CFR Part 350). All trade secrecy claims submitted to EPA under EPCRA are handled and stored according to procedures set out in the 

### Manual for Physical Handling, Security, and Protection of Files containing Trade Secret Claims Submitted under Sections 303, 311 and 312 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right

- to
-Know Act (EPCRA), December 201 4
. These procedures were developed expressly for EPCRA trade secrecy claims with the knowledge that these documents are sensitive. Handling and review of documents containing EPCRA trade secret information is permitted only by persons who have obtained formal clearance to access the information based on a work

-related need to engage in these activities. When not being processed o r reviewed by authorized individuals, the claim submissions containing trade secret information are stored in restricted access areas. To ensure that appropriate handling procedures are activated and the confidentiality of EPCRA trade secret submissions i s maintained, the Agency attaches a cover sheet to the top of each trade secret document and otherwise marks the document to clearly identify the document as EPCRA confidential. **3(g) Sensitive Questions**  The information gathering activities under this renewal ICR do not involve any sensitive questions. **4. THE**  **RESPONDENTS AND**  **THE INFORMATION**  **REQUESTED 4(a)**  **Respondents/ NAICS Codes**  Sections 302, 303, and 304 are applicable to all facilities that either have present or release the regulated substances. These sections apply to facilities in both the manufacturing and non

- manufacturing sectors.Facilities in the following major group of NAICS codes may be subject to either or both implementing regulations under EPCRA section 302 and 304. There may be other facilities covered by these regulations, but not listed. Major group that may be subject are: 11 (Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting), 22 (Utilities), 31

- 33 ( Manufacturing), 43 ( Wholesale Trade ), 44
- 45 ( Retail Trade ) , 48
- 49 ( Transportation and Warehousing)
. **4(b) Information Requested**  **4(b)(i) Data Items**  Facilities newly subject to section 302 must notify their SERC and LEPC if the facility have any extremely hazardous substance (EHS) at or above its threshold planning quantity (TPQ) established in the regulations in 40 CFR part 355. Under section 303, the facility must designate a facility emergency coordinator and provide "information to (the LEPC) necessary for developing and implementing the (LEPC's) emergency plan." The amount o f information necessary to fulfill this requirement is determined by the facility and the LEPC. If a facility has very low likelihood of having a release that would impact the community, the LEPC would probably require very little information for emergency planning. However, if the facility is a large chemical plant or is in close proximity to a populated area, the LEPC most likely will develop extensive planning (especially if the facility is anticipating an offsite response). Information requested for the plan would likely include:

### 5

 Names, hazards, quantities, and storage information for EHSs on - site;

 Methods and procedures to be followed by facility owners and operators to respond to a release;

 Description of emergency equipment;

 Methods for determining the occurrence of a release, and the area or population likely to be affected by the release; and

 Procedures to provide reliable, effective, and timely notification. LEPCs were required to have their plans completed by October 17, 1988 and th ey are required to review and update the plan annually
. F acilities newly subject to these requirements would have to provide emergency planning notification . Facilities already subject would only have to update the LEPC if the information that they have already provided changes. Under section 304, respondents are required to notify the LEPC and SERC of releases of EHSs or hazardous substances (as identified in CERCLA section 101) above the reportable quantity. The notice must include the following information, to the extent that it is known:

 T he chemical name or identity of any substance involved in the release;

 An indication of whether the substance is on the list of EHSs;

 An estimate of the quantity of any such substance that was released into the environment;

 The time and duration of the release;

 The medium or media into which the release occurred;

 Any known or anticipated acute or chronic health risks associated with the emergency and, where appropriate, advice regarding medical attention neces sary for exposed individuals;

 Proper precautions to take as a result of the release, including evacuation (unless such information is readily available to the community emergency coordinator pursuant to the emergency plan); and

 The name and telephone num ber of the person or persons to be contacted for further information. The facility must also provide a written follow

-up report that includes the information above and any updates. Also, additional information must be given:

 Actions taken to respond to and contain the release;

 Any known or anticipated acute or chronic health risks associated with the release; and

### 6

 Where appropriate, advice regarding medical attention necessary for exposed individuals.
**4(b)(ii) Respondent Activities**  To determine if a facility is subject to section 302, the facility would need to review the EHS list to determine if it has any of the 355 chemicals on

- site. The facility would then need to look at the inventory of any EHSs it may have on

- site and compare it to the TPQ. If the facility has an EHS above the TPQ, the facility would need to contact their SERC and LEPC to notify them of their reporting obligation. (

Note: States may have specific requirements regarding the format for this notification under the state right

- to
- know regulations. Facilities are encouraged to contact their state.) To comply with section 303, the designated facility coordinator would have to work with the LEPC to ensure that the community has an adequate plan to respond to emergencies that would involve their facility. Facility coordinators may be asked to serve as an industry representative to the LEPC. To comply with section 304, the facility would need to determine, when an EHS or a CERCLA hazardous substance is being released, if the quantity of the chemical released is greater than the reportable quantity established in the regulations in 40 CFR parts 302 and 355. Information on the release needs to be provided in the initial telephone notification to the SERC and LEPC. The material safety data sheet (MSDS) or other information that the facility has would provide the health risks and medical information, as well as response information. The written follow

-up notice needs to be filed "as soon as practical after a release." This notice documents and updates the information provided in the initial notification. Because the initial notification should be provided immediately after the discovery of the release, the written follow

-up notice allows the facility more time to determine with greater precision the information provided in the initial notification. The facil ity may include a copy of its own internal report of the circumstances of the accident. **5. THE**  **INFORMATION COLLECTED:**  **AGENCY ACTIVITIES,**  **COLLECTION METHODOLOGY,**  **AND INFORMATION**  **MANAGEMENT 5(a)**  **Agency Activities** No information provided under sections 302, 303, and 304 is sent to EPA. All of the information is kept at the state and local level. **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management**  EPA does not receive the data; therefore , EPA does not have any special data collection methodology and management. However, to assist SERCs and LEPCs in their information management practices and emergency planning, EPA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have created the C omputer Aided Management of Emergency Operations (CAMEO) database. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility** 

### 7

There are no special allowances made for small businesses in the regulations for sections 302, 303, and 304. The burden hours for small businesses are consi dered to be smaller than those for large facilities because of the reduced number of chemicals and processes present at smaller facilities. **5(d) Collection Schedule**  The frequency of collection for these sections of EPCRA is required by statute. Facilities are required to report any relevant changes when they occur. Under section 304, releases of EHSs and CERCLA hazardous substances in excess of the reportable quantity must be reported "immediately" after the owner/operator has knowledge that they occurred. The written follow

-up notice is required "as soon as practicable after the release." **6. ESTIMATING**  **THE BURDEN**  **AND COST**  **OF COLLECTION**  **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden**  EPA estimated the respondent burden hours and costs associated with all recordkeeping and reporting requirements covered in EPCRA sections 302, 303, and 304. Unit burden and costs were estimated by labor category required for each of the tasks performed b y facilities under Sections 302 , 303 and 304 (codified in 40 CFR Part 355 ) , and tasks performed by LEPCs under EPCRA section 303
. Based on the data we received from EPA Regions for 45 states , we estimate that approximately 90,180 facilities would be sub ject to EPCRA Sections 302 and 303 , which is lower than our estimate in the previous ICR . However, to be conservative, we are using our previous estimate of 95, 000 facilities for the period covered by this ICR
. EPA estimates that approximately 2 5 percent of these facilities are manufacturers ( 23,750) and 71,250 facilities are non - manufacturers. We do not expect any new facilities to be in compliance during this ICR period based on the data obtained from EPA Regions
. The number of notifications under section 304 was based on the average number of CERCLA hazardous substance and EHS releases reported to the National Response Center for the past three years , approximately 1 0 , 000
. Exhibit 1 presents the estimated unit burden by labor category required for each of the tasks performed by facilities under EPCRA Sections 302, 303 and 304 ( 40 CFR Part 355 ) , and tasks performed by LEPCs under EPCRA section 303. **Read and Understand Regul ations**  EPA assumes that only newly regulated facilities incur the cost of reading and understanding regulations at 40 CFR Part 355. As explained above, we do not expect any new facilities to come into compliance in the period covered by this ICR based on information we received from few SERCs
. Data from the Regions on the number of facilities subject to EPCRA Sections 302 and 303 is lower than the previous estimate probably due to facilities using chemicals that are less hazardous keeping inventory down. Therefore, EPA did not estimate any burden for this activity for new facilities. All currently regulated facilities are already familiar with the regulations and the burden for this activity was estimated in previous ICRs. **Emergency Planning Notifi**  **cation by Facilities**  **(EPCRA Section 302)**

### 8

All newly regulated facilities must first determine whether they have at least a threshold planning quantity of an EHS. All newly regulated facilities are required to notify the SERC and designate a facility rep resentative. As mentioned above, we do not expect any new facilities to be in compliance in this ICR period. Currently covered facilities already completed this activity. B ecause few facilities may have significant changes that would affect emergency planning, EPA estimates that only ten percent of all subject facilities will be required to inform LEPCs of any changes at the facility. EPA assumes that only manufacturers may have changes occurring at the facilities which require notification to the LEPCs. In addition, because little information is required from facilities after the initial submittal, EPA also estimates that only five percent of all subject facilities will provide additional information to LEPCs either to develop or implement emergency plans. The burden associated with providing local governments with updated information for planning purposes is assumed to be a small percentage of the initial burden for contributing to planning eff orts . EPA estimates that it may take 1 3.0 hours for currently covered facilities to inform LEPC of any changes relevant to emergency planning and to provide information to the LEPC requests to develop emergency response plans. (See Exhibit 1). **Emergency Release Notification by Facilities (** **EP CRA Section 304**  **)** The number of annual reportable quantity (RQ) releases based on the average number of CERCLA hazardous substance and EHS releases reported in the National Response Center for the last three years is approximately 1 0 ,000 . EPA estimates 90 percent of these releases require notifying LEPCs and SERCs, and 10 percent require notifying the 911 operator regarding transportation related releases
. All reportable releases except transportation

-related require a written follow

-up report. For this ICR, EPA contacted few facilities that reported releases of EHSs to determine the actual burden incurred to comply with initial notification and written follow

-up requirements in Section 304 of EPCRA. For initial notification, these facilities take an average of 10 to 15 minutes. For the follow

-up report these facilities take an average of 2 to 8 hours. To be conservative, EPA will continue to use the same burden estimated in the previous ICRs. T he burden per respondent for initial notification is approximately 0.50 hours (30 minutes) and for written follow

-up, it is approximately 8.0 h ours. EPA estimates that it takes approximately 0.25 hours (15 minutes) to report a transportation

-related release t o the 911 operator. **Emergency Response Plan Development by LEPCs ( EPCRA Section 303**  **)** Emergency Response Plans must be reviewed and updated annually. EPA estimates that SERCs review all LEPC plans annually. EPA contacted few LEPCs in previous ICR period to determine the burden associated with reviewing or updating their emergency response plan. Based on information from LEPCs, the time required to update plans varies from 18 to 40 hours. To develop an estimate, EPA assumed that the largest 120 LEPC s would spend 40 hours a year and the smaller LEPCs would spend 20 hours a year; a weighted average of 21 hours was obtained for the recordkeeping burden to keep records of all Emergency Response Plans. Similarly, a weighted average was developed for rec ordkeeping associated with release reports. The LEPC with a large concentration of chemical plants indicated that it spent a month on release notification; the other LEPCs indicated that this activity took five hours a year at most. A weighted

### 9

average of 10 hours was developed for the annual burden for each of the LEPCs (3, 5 00) and SERCs (56). This burden is same as what was estimated in the previous ICR. **Exhibit 1 Section 302, 303, and 304 Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements** 

**Estimated Unit**  **Burden and Cost Annual Hours Burden**  **Total Hours Information Collection Activity**  **Management Technical**  **Clerical Burden**  **Annual Cost EMERGENCY PLANNING (Facilities)**  **Inform LEPC of changes to facility that may affect em**  **ergency planning 0.**  **5 0**  **1.00 0.50**  **2.0 0**  **$ 10**  **3 .**  **8 7**  **Provide information to LEPC, as required 2.00**  **8.00 1.00**  **11.00 $**  **6 28**  **. 5**  **2 EMERGENCY RELEASE NOTIFICATION (Facilities)**  **Determine if a release is an RQ 0.10**  **0.10 0.00**  **0.2 5**  **$12. 2**  **5 Notify**  **LEPC and SERC of any RQ release 0.50**  **0.00 0.00**  **0.50 $**  **31.47 Develop and submit written follow**  **- up notice**  **1.50 5.00**  **1.5 0**  **8.00 $**  **430 .**  **89 Notify 911 operator of transportation**  **- related releases**  **0.25 0.00**  **0.00 0.25**  **$ 15.74**  **EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS (** **EPCRA section 303) Update E**  **mergency Response Plans (LEPCs) 5.00**  **15.00 1.00**  **21.00 $**  **1, 0**  **84.38 Review** **Em ergency Response Plans (SERCs)**  **4.00 12.00**  **0.00 16.00**  **$8 4**  **2. 88**  **Keep records and make them available to the public**  **0.00 0.00**  **10.00 10.00**  **$ 307.8**  **0 6(b)**  **Estimating Respondent Costs** Estimating costs to respondents on an annual basis is accomplished by multiplying the respondent burden estimates for each labor category by the corresponding labor rate for that category. Unit costs for each respondent or activity are then multiplied by the number of respondents or activities performed on an annual basis to yield a total cost for each information collection activity in Section 6(d). These costs are shown in Exhibit 1. EPA estimates an hourly respondent labor cost for manufacturing facility respondents of $ 67.15 for managerial staff, $ 49.65 for technical staff, and $24.16 for clerical staff, including wages and benefits. Hourly respondent labor costs for non

- manufacturing facility respondents are estimated at $5 4.21 for managerial staff, $ 32.28 for technical staff, and $2 3.41 for clerical staff. EPA estimates an hourly respondent labor cost (including overhead) for LEPCs and SERCs of $ 53.4 9 for managerial staff, $ 52.51 for technical staff, and $ 30.78 for clerical staff . EPA consulted Bureau of Labor and Statistics, June 2015 for wage and labor rates. Total burden hours and costs for the ICR are shown in Exhibit 2. **Capital and O&M Costs**

### 10

Capital costs incurred by state and local agencies were estimated in the previous ICR. Capital costs include the cost of space required to store information in filing cabinets. Life expectancy for file cabinets is assumed to be 15 years. Therefore, the Agency di d not develop any cost for this since it was developed in the previous ICR. Operating and maintenance costs are limited to mailing costs. Facilities are assumed to incur postage costs for the following activities:

 Providing information to the LEPC as required under EPCRA section 303(d)(3).

 S ubmitting written follow

-up notice (assume about 4 pages per report) Facilities are expected to incur long distance charges when notifying SERCs and LEPCs that a release has occurred . Long distance charges are estimated to be $ 4
. 0 0 per fifteen

-minute call. LEPCs are assumed to incur postage costs for the following activities:

 Submitting Emergency Response Plans to the SERCs for review.

 Submitting Emergency Response Plans as requested by SERCs to f ederal regional response teams for review Postage is estimated to cost $0. 4 9 for a first class letter and approximately $ 6.00 to submit a LEPC plan. Operation and maintenance costs are shown in Exhibit 3.
**6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost**  EPA estimates no annual Agency burden associated with this ICR. Only state and local government entities implement the program in sections 302, 303, and 304 of EPCRA. **6(d) Estimating Total Annual Respondent Burden and Costs**  Exhibit 2 presents the resp ondent burden for each information collection activity and for the sum of all information collection activities performed by each respondent type. The total average annual burden to facility respondents is 145,500 hours at a cost of $ 9
. 1 million (or 436 ,5 0 0 hours at a cost of $ 27.3 million for three years). The total average annual respondent burden for state and local governments is 10 9 , 9 56 hours at a cost of $5.0 million (or 32 9 , 8 68 hours at a cost of $ 1 5
. 0 million for three years). These burden estimates are summarized in Exhibit 2. **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost**  See Exhibit 4, below. **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** 

### 11

Based on the information we received from EPA Regions , the number of facilities subject to section 302 dropped. However, we used the previous estimate as in the previous ICR. Number of facilities fluctuates from year

-to -year so we assumed the number of facilities to be the same as in the previous ICR. There are no change s to the burden for activities related to section 302 reporting requi rements. Labor and wage rates are adjusted to the current data on BLS. T he release notification calls to the National Response Center decreased by 1,900 from the previous ICR due to the reduction in the number of releases reported in the last three years. This caused a decrease in the burden for facility respondents by 11,750 hours
. Labor and wage rates are adjusted to the current data available on BLS. Burden incurred by LEPCs remain the same as in the previous ICR. Labor and wage rates are adjusted to the current data available on BLS , June 2015
. **6(g) Burden Statement**  As explained in the previous sections of this document, EPA do not expect any new facilities to come into compliance during this ICR period. This ICR only covers periodic reporting or updates of information submitted previously by existing facilities under Section 302 . The average reporting burden for a limited number of existing faci lities, to inform the LEPC of any changes at the facility that may affect emergency planning is 2 .0 hours. The average reporting burden for facilities to provide information to LEPC is 11.0 hours. The average reporting burden for facilities reporting rel eases under EPCRA Section 304 is estimated to average approximately 9 hours per release, including the time for determining if the release is a reportable quantity, notifying the LEPC and SERC, or the 911 operator, and developing and submitting a written f ollow

-up notice. There are no record

- keeping requirements for facilities under EPCRA Sections 302

- 304. The total burden to facilities over three years is 4 36,500 hours at a cost of $ 2 7. 3 million. The average burden for emergency planning activities is 21 hours per plan for LEPCs, and 16 hours per plan for SERCs. Each SERC and LEPC is also estimated to incur an annual record keeping burden of 10 hours. The total burden to LEPC and SERC over three years is 32 9,868 hours at a cost of $ 1 5.0 million. **Burden Statement** : The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average about 2 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or fina ncial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accurac y of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number EPA
-

### 12

HQ
- SFUND
- 2005
- 0008, which is available for online viewing at www.regulations.gov , or in person viewing at the Superfund Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, W ashington, D.C. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the Superfund Docket is (202) 566

- 0276. An electronic version of the public docket is available at www.regulations.gov. This site can be used to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When in the system, select “search,” then key in the Docket ID Number identified above. Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA
- HQ
- SFUND
- 2005
- 0008 and OMB Control Number 2050

- 0092 in any correspondence.

**Exhibit 2 Section 302, 303, and 304 Reporting and**  **Recordkeeping Requirements**

**Estimated Annual**  **Burden and Cost**

**Number of Annual Hours Burden**  **Total Hours**  **Information Collection Activity Respondents**  **Management Technical**  **Clerical Burden**  **Annual Cost RULE FAMILIARIZATION**  **(Facilities)** Read and understand regulations at 40 CFR Part 355 0 0 0 0 0

**Subtotal -**  **- -**  **- 0**  **0 EMERGENCY PLANNING (Facilities)**  Calculate if chemicals meet/exceed TPQ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notify SERC that facility is subject to emergency planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 Designate facility representative and notify LEPC 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inform LEPC of facility changes that may affect emer. Planning 9,500 4,750 9,500 4,750 19,000 $ 986,755 Provide information to LEPC, as required 4,750 9,500 38,000 4,750 52,250 $ 2,895,470

**Subtotal 71,250**  **$ 3,972,225**  **EMERGENCY RELEASE NOTIFICATION (Facilities)** Determine if release is an RQ 1 0 ,000 1,000 1,000 0 2,000 $ 122,500 Notify LEPC and SERC of any RQ release 9,000 4,500 0 0 4,500 $ 339,876 Develop and submit written follow

- up notice 9,000 13,500 45,000 9,000 67,500 $ 4,653,612 Notify 911 operator of transportation

- related releases 1, 0 00 250 0 0 250 $ 18,888

**Subtotal 74,250**  **$ 5,134,876**  **Total (Facilities) EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS (SERCs, LEPCs)**  Update Emergency Response Plans (LEPCs) 3, 5 00 17,500 52,500 3,500 73,500 $ 3,795,330 Review Emergency Response Plans (SERCs) 56 224 672 0 896 $ 147,201

### 13 Keep records and make them available to the public 3, 5 56 0 0 35,560 35,560 $ 1,063,757

**Subt otal (SERCs and LEPCs)**  **109,956 $**  **5,006,288**

**Exhibit 3 Capital/Start**  **- up and O& M Costs** 

**(Annual )**  **Facilities and LEPCs Activity**  **Capital/Start -**  **up Costs O & M Costs** 

**Provide information to LEPC, as required (Facilities)**  **-- $**  **2, 32**  **7.50**

### 14

**Notify LEPC and SERC of any RQ release (Facilities)**  **-- $**  **43,20 0**  **.00**

**Develop and submit written follow -**  **up notice (Facilities)**  **-- $**  **5,292.00**

**Subm it**  **Em ergency Response Plans**  **(LEPCs) --**  **$1 8**  **,000 .00** 



### Exhibit 4 **Summary of Total Annual**  **Burden and Cost Estimates**

**Burden Hours Labor**  **O & M**
**Facilities 145,500**  **$ 4,107,101**  **$ 50,819.50**  **SERCs and LEPCs 109,956**  **$ 5,006.288**  **$ 1**  **8 ,000**  **.00 Total**  **255,456 $**  **9,113,389 $**  **68,819.50**