alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.7



PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   Ministry of Energy Mines and Petroleum Resources


RECORD OF 2 POST CLAIM - MINERAL TENURE ACT

(Section 27)



	
____________________________________
	
391988______________________________

	
Mining Division
	
Tenure No.

	
____________________________________
	
____________________________________

	
Gold Commissioner
	
Date of Record




_____________________________________________________________________________________



APPLICATION TO RECORD A 2 POST CLAIM



I, Stephen Kenwood, Name of Locator, 2073 149th Street, Surrey, British Columbia, V4A 8C4, (604) 535-8146, Client No. 134185, Agent for Paul Reynolds, 4035 W. 31st Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6S 1Y7, Client No. 122617, hereby apply for record of a 2 Post Claim for the location as outlined on the attached copy of mineral titles reference map No. 082L2E, in the Vernon Mining Division.



ACCESS



Describe how you gained access to the location, include reference to roads, trails, topographic features, permanent landmarks and a description of the legal post location.


Access to location gained by traveling east of Vernon on Highway 6 15 km. past Cherryville to Monashee Creek.  The initial post is approximately 2.6 km. further south along Highway 6 from Monashee Creek and about 50 metres east of Highway 6.



TAG INFORMATION



I have affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "INITIAL POST" (No. 1) to the initial post and impressed this information on the tag:



TAG NUMBER 706068 M  INITIAL POST (No. 1)



	
CLAIM NAME
	
WYATT 5

	
LOCATOR
	
Stephen Kenwood

	
AGENT FOR
	
Paul Reynolds

	
DATE COMMENCED
	
February 8, 2002

	
TIME COMMENCED
	
11:00

	
DIR. TO F.P.
	
015

	
METRES TO RIGHT
	
500

	
METRES TO LEFT
	
0






"Direction" means a bearing measured between 0 degrees and 360 degrees, where 0 degrees is the bearing of true north.    time is a.m.


I have securely affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "FINAL POST (No. 2)" to the final post (or the witness post) and impressed this information on the tag:



	
CLAIM NAME
	
WYATT 5

	
LOCATOR
	
Stephen Kenwood

	
AGENT FOR
	
Paul Reynolds

	
DIST. FROM I.P.
	
500 metres

	
DATE COMPLETED
	
February 8, 2002

	
TIME COMPLETED
	
12:15






If a witness post was placed for final post:  Bearing and distance from witness post to the true position of the final corner post, exactly as written on the witness post:  _________ degrees, _________ metres.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT



I have complied with all of the terms and conditions of the Mineral Tenure Act and Regulations pertaining to the location of the 2 post claims and have attached a plan of the location on which the positions of the initial and final post (and witness post, if applicable) are indicated.  The tag information supplied above is the identical information that I impressed upon the respective tags affixed to the applicable post when I located this claim, and the information is true and correct.


/s/  "Stephen Kenwood"

Stephen Kenwood

Signature of Locator



SEAL



RECEIVED

SUB-RECORDER

VANCOUVER, BC

FEB. 28, 2002

Recording Stamp
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12262Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Katya Miller (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 5, 2023 - 11:11pmI have been researching and writing about this Statue of Freedom, also known as Lady Freedom for years and hadn't heard about this slice of her life. Thanks for sharing it.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Finamore, Robert (OST) 

^T" 

From: Bill Evans [bill@mietuslaw.com] 'i'• f•OllTATIO^ 

Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 2:49 PM • -] Or'ERAtlOr.i.S 

To: Finamore, Robert (OST) 

Subject: AEROVIAS DE MEXICO EXEMPTION--OST-2007-26968 .... . , _ , 

^ -' '•••.-"-, \ .-> |: on . 

Bob: 

On January 27, 2011, and pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 40109(c), Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de 

C.V. ("Aeromexico") requested renewal of the code share exemption authority granted by 

Notice of Action Taken dated March 5, 2010, to engage m foreign air transportation of 

persons, property and mail between Acapulco, Mexico, and New York, NY by displaying its 

code on flights operated by Delta Air Lines, IncC'Delta"). In the application, Aeromexico 

stated that it was not seeking renewal of its code share exemption to serve six other routes 

including Acapulco-Atlanta, Cancun-Los Angeles and Puerto Vallarta-Atlanta. By Notice of 

Action dated February 11, 2011, the Department renewed the Acapulco-New York authority, 

and took no action with respect to the other routes, which are to expire on March 5, 2011. 

On further reflection, Aeromexico has determined that it would like to retain the exemption 

authority for the three routes mentioned above, so it may institute code share service when 

warranted by demand. Consequently, Aeromexico respectfully requests that the 

Department amend its prior NOAT or issue a new NOAT renewing the exemption to serve 

those routes through February 11, 2012. If you need any additional information, please let 

me know. 

William C. Evans* 

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 

6701 Democracy Boulevard #300 

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 

(202) 747-5212 Office 

(410) 827-5074 Home Office 

(240) 396-5362 Fax 

*Admirted in the District of Columbia 

Practice limited to Federal transportation matters 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE; The information in this e-mail and any attachments may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. II you 

are not the Intended recipient, please do not review, use, disclose, distribute or copy the information it contains; destroy this e-mail and notify the sender by reply 

e-mail or an e-mail to admin@mietuslaw.com. Thanks. 

1
October 6, 2005

26254

#### State v. Feldstein

Affirmed
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply1166Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Valerie Broome (not verified)PermalinkJuly 8, 2020 - 4:32pmAwesome!  Beautiful...
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 82350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25936]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-097]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed November 13, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through November 17, 2023 10 a.m. 
EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20230162, Final, USAF, FL, KC-46A Main Operating Base No. 6 
Beddown, Review Period Ends: 12/26/2023, Contact: Austin Naranjo 813-
263-9331.
EIS No. 20230163, Draft Supplement, USACE, HI, Draft General 
Reevaluation Report with Integrated Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement: Ala Wai Canal Flood Risk Management Study, Oahu, Hawaii, 
Comment Period Ends: 01/08/2024, Contact: Eric Merriam 412-395-7185.

    Dated: November 17, 2023.
Julie Smith,
Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2023-25936 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### In the Matter of Paul Gros, Individually and as President of the Port Washington Police Benevolent Association, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Port Washington Police District et al., Respondents.

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of the Chief of Police of the Port Washington Police Department, dated November 1, 1988, which denied Port Washington Police Officers the use of *619vacation days in December of 1988, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated July 27, 1989, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.

Since the order of the Chief of Police was effective only for the month of December of 1988, the determination of whether the action was arbitrary and capricious is academic *(see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714). "[T]his case is * * * not of the class that should be preserved as an exception to the mootness doctrine” *(Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, supra,*at 715). Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 22000D0011 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22000D0011

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 11/2000 of 28 January 2000 amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 103 , 12/04/2001 P. 0022 - 0023 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 11/2000

of 28 January 2000

amending Annex VI (social security) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as adjusted by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision No 81/1999 of the EEA Joint Committee of 25 June 1999(1).

(2) Decision No 172 of 9 December 1998 on the model forms necessary for the application of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 and (EEC) No 574/72 (E 101)(2), adopted by the Administrative Commission on Social Security for Migrant Workers, is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 3.48 (Decision No 164) in Annex VI to the Agreement: ", as amended by:

- 399 D 0371: Decision No 172 of 9 December 1998 (OJ L 143, 8.6.1999, p. 13), corrected in OJ L 159, 25.6.1999, p. 67."

Article 2

The texts of Decision No 172 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, which are annexed to the respective language versions of this Decision, are authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 29 January 2000, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(3).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2000.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

F. Barbaso

(1) OJ L 296, 23.11.2000, p. 37.

(2) OJ L 143, 8.6.1999, p. 13. Corrigendum: OJ L 159, 25.6.1999, p. 67.

(3) No constitutional requirements indicated.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Florence P. Arkwright et al., as Executrices of Henry Schoenherr, Deceased Trustee under the Will of Henry Franciscus, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Queens County,

March 31, 1958.

*Milbanh, Tweed, Hope & Hadley*for Gail Dunkak, respondent.

*Kenneth J. Mullane*for Florence Madden and others, respondents.

*James D. Walsh*for Florence P. Arkwright and others, petitioners.

*Alfred A. Franciscus*for Alfred S. Franciscus and another.

Anthony P. Savarese, J.

In this accounting proceeding, more particularly described in the decision of this court in *Matter of Franciscus*(12 Misc 2d 335) rendered simultaneously herewith, respondent Gail Dunkak, individually, appeared specially pursuant to section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act for the purpose of moving to strike a cross claim contained in the answer of respondents Howard Franciscus *et al.,*who are distributees of Henry Franciscus.

The facts insofar as relevant to this motion are as follows: The Franciscus ’ will created a trust of one third of the residue to pay the income to Gail Dunkak and to pay the principal to Gail Dunkak in three equal installments on her 21st, 26th and 31st birthdays. The first such installment was paid in 1956.

The petition in the instant accounting sought only that the account be settled; that the court determine the disposition *356of a certain other trust which is the subject of the accompanying decision; that fees be fixed; and that successor trustees be appointed. Respondent Gail Dunkak appeared generally by counsel. The answer filed by respondents Howard Franciscus *et al.,*alleged that the trust created for the benefit of Gail Dunkak is invalid and that the fund which Henry Franciscus purported to convey in such trust passed to his intestate distributees. The said answer contains a cross claim which seeks to compel respondent Gail Dunkak to return the principal installment she received on her 21st birthday.

The answer making the cross claim was served upon counsel for Gail Dunkak in New York, who, by virtue of their duly authorized notice of appearance, had submitted their client to the jurisdiction of this court as though she had been personally served with the citation herein within the State of New York.

Assuming *arguendo*that, by virtue of their supporting affidavits, petitioners in this accounting have joined in said cross claim, the court is nevertheless without jurisdiction to grant the relief requested. *(Matter of Kaine,*252 App. Div. 101.)

Gail Dunkak appeared here in response to a citation in an accounting proceeding. That citation gave her no intimation that the validity of the trust for her benefit was to be litigated or that an order directing her to pay a sum of money might result. (See Surrogate’s *Gt.*Act, § 53, subd. 4.) Accordingly, the motion to strike the cross claim of respondents Howard Franciscus *et al.,*is granted.

Submit order on notice.
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg01.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg02.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg03.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg04.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg05.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg06.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg07.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg08.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg09.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg10.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg11.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg12.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg13.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg14.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg15.jpg">
<IMG SRC="generaltermspg16.jpg">
Exhibit 32.2

LASERSIGHT INCORPORATED

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of LaserSight Incorporated (the Company) does hereby certify that:

| | 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the   Company for quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies   with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | 2. The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.                                                                                                   

|Dated: November 14, 2006 | / s/ Zhaokai Tang                
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------
|                         |                                  
|                         | Zhaokai   Tang                   
|                         | Interim   Chief Financial Officer

The certifications set forth above are being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 1350, has been provided to LaserSight Incorporated and will be retained LaserSight Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Information on the Uses of the S ubstance and P otential Consumer E xposure

The substance is 100% used industrially in a closed system. During production of the mineral wool products the substance is cured to a three

- dimensional polymeric network and does not exist in the final mineral wool product.

The use is contained. During production the substance is consumed and the mineral wool end products do not contain the substance.

The general public will not be exposed to the substance as there is no substance left in the final product as it is consumed in the production process.

Information about possible exposure at work place is summarized below.

Working environment during production of the substance: The production process is not fully automated. The operator may thus be exposed to the reactant che micals used during the manual handling. The following procedures involve possible exposure to reactants.

This chemical is transferred from the storage tank to the reactor through a pipe, i.e. in a closed system. The risk of exposure is considered to be insignificant.

Personal protection

Safety goggles and nitrile rubber gloves are worn during production. Respiratory protection, multifilter type A2B2E2K1 applied with P3 filter must be used in case of spillage.

Thes e chemicals are all solids when dosed to the reactor and small amounts of dust may be released.

To reduce the formation of dust in the working environment, the batch recipes shall be adjusted to fit full sacks to avoid the weighing procedure or it shall be done via a powder handling sluice. Dosing to the reactor will be done with local exhaust situated at the reactor opening.

Personal protection

Safety goggles and nitrile rubber gloves are worn during production.

During handling and cleaning after possible spills of acid anhydrides, respiratory protection with multifilter type A2B2E2K1 apply with P3 filter shall be used. Local exhaust is used when opening the reactor.Indirect exposure to humans:

To ensure that no persons other than the operators are being exposed, the production will take place in a room with closed doors in order to avoid diffuse emission. Unauthorized persons are not allowed admittance, until the room has been sufficiently ventilated.

Technological processes related to the use of the substance:

Th e substance will be polymerized and consumed during the production of end products and will not exist as such in end

- use products
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE I

TRANSITIONAL MEASURES

TRANSITIONAL MEASURES

Article 18

The measures listed in Annex V shall apply in respect of Croatia under the conditions laid down in that Annex.

---