alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Joseph V.  Roberts,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Nutrition
Management  Services Company, a Pennsylvania  corporation (the "Company"),  does
hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2006 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                        /s/ Joseph V. Roberts
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Joseph V. Roberts
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2006
```
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply559Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Devin Costlow (not verified)PermalinkMay 11, 2022 - 2:29amThe lion faces have always struck me. I wonder if the the-AoC had a meaning behind choosing that symbol as opposed to say an eagle?
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RONALD RUDOLPH RODRIGUEZ

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00259

- C R

Appeal from the

207 th District Court

of Comal C ounty, Texas

(TC# CR2015

- 395 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State ’s third motion for extension of time within which to file

the brief until May 5 , 201 7

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO F ILE

THE STATE ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Sammy M. McCrary

, State ’ s attorney, prepare the

State ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before May 5 , 201 7

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21 st day of April , 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McCl ure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox , JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IEA Income Fund XII, L.P. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Dennis J. Tietz, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant, and John Kallas,
the Chief Financial Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., certify, based on their
knowledge, that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                                 
| | ---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Registrant.

May 14, 2003

| |  |    |  |                                                 
| |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------
| |  | By |  | /s/ Dennis J. Tietz                             
| |  |    |  |                                                 
| |  |    |  | Dennis J. Tietz, President and Chief Executive  
| |  |    |  | Officer of Cronos Capital Corp.,                
| |  |    |  | General Partner of the Registrant               
| |  |    |  |                                                 
| |  |    |  | /s/ John Kallas                                 
| |  |    |  |                                                 
| |  |    |  | John Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of Cronos  
| |  |    |  | Capital Corp., General Partner of the Registrant

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

|* |  | This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, other than as required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2016202EN.01008101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/81

---

Article 85

(ex Article 31 TEU)

(ex Article 31 TEU)

1.   Eurojust's mission shall be to support and strengthen coordination and cooperation between national investigating and prosecuting authorities in relation to serious crime affecting two or more Member States or requiring a prosecution on common bases, on the basis of operations conducted and information supplied by the Member States' authorities and by Europol.

In this context, the European Parliament and the Council, by means of regulations adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall determine Eurojust's structure, operation, field of action and tasks. These tasks may include:

| (a) | the initiation of criminal investigations, as well as proposing the initiation of prosecutions conducted by competent national authorities, particularly those relating to offences against the financial interests of the Union; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the initiation of criminal investigations, as well as proposing the initiation of prosecutions conducted by competent national authorities, particularly those relating to offences against the financial interests of the Union;

| (b) | the coordination of investigations and prosecutions referred to in point (a); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the coordination of investigations and prosecutions referred to in point (a);

| (c) | the strengthening of judicial cooperation, including by resolution of conflicts of jurisdiction and by close cooperation with the European Judicial Network. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the strengthening of judicial cooperation, including by resolution of conflicts of jurisdiction and by close cooperation with the European Judicial Network.

These regulations shall also determine arrangements for involving the European Parliament and national Parliaments in the evaluation of Eurojust's activities.

2.   In the prosecutions referred to in paragraph 1, and without prejudice to Article 86, formal acts of judicial procedure shall be carried out by the competent national officials.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                         846,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,147,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                   120,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,470,874
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,783,298
<PP&E>                                       5,781,993
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,789,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,744,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,992,354
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       417,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,608,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,744,633
<SALES>                                     25,227,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,227,635
<CGS>                                       22,056,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,056,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,772,584
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                91,042
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             323,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,016,136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,016,636)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,016,636)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.72)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1IEA Income Fund XII, L.P.Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income Fund XII, L.P. (the“Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 13, 2006/s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ
null

2015-04-15

544.47046

eng - Argued: 2015-04-15. Docket number: 5-14-0017WC
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 884 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue final rules relating to 

listing of the gray wolf in the Western Great Lakes and Wyoming 

under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2015 

Mr. RIBBLE (for himself, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. BENISHEK, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. 

DUFFY, Mr. EMMER, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. 

KIND, Mr. KLINE, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. 

SIMPSON, Mr. WALBERG, and Mr. WALZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue final rules 

relating to listing of the gray wolf in the Western Great 

Lakes and Wyoming under the Endangered Species Act 

of 1973, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULE REGARDING 

4 GRAY WOLVES IN THE WESTERN GREAT 

5 LAKES. 

6 Before the end of the 60-day period beginning on the 

7 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 884 IH

1 shall reissue the final rule published on December 28, 

2 2011 (76 Fed. Reg. 81666), without regard to any other 

3 provision of statute or regulation that applies to issuance 

4 of such rule. Such reissuance shall not be subject to judi5 cial review. 

6 SEC. 2. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULE REGARDING GRAY 

7 WOLVES IN WYOMING. 

8 Before the end of the 60-day period beginning on the 

9 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

10 shall reissue the final rule published on September 10, 

11 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 55530), without regard to any other 

12 provision of statute or regulation that applies to issuance 

13 of such rule. Such reissuance shall not be subject to judi14 cial review. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2016202EN.01009001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/90

---

Article 106

(ex Article 86 TEC)

(ex Article 86 TEC)

1.   In the case of public undertakings and undertakings to which Member States grant special or exclusive rights, Member States shall neither enact nor maintain in force any measure contrary to the rules contained in the Treaties, in particular to those rules provided for in Article 18 and Articles 101 to 109.

2.   Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or having the character of a revenue-producing monopoly shall be subject to the rules contained in the Treaties, in particular to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them. The development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Union.

3.   The Commission shall ensure the application of the provisions of this Article and shall, where necessary, address appropriate directives or decisions to Member States.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,100,028
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 29,301,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,654,842
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,956,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,243,163
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,304,785
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,548,175)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                     30,956,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,908,649
<CGS>                                       22,853,947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,853,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,969,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             339,766
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,806,068)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (185,857)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,620,211)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,620,211)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald G. Dancause, Appellant.

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered September 6, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of conspiracy in the fifth degree and insurance fraud in the fifth degree.

The sentence imposed, while the harshest defendant could have received, was in accord with the plea bargain agreement and within the statutory guidelines (Penal Law § 70.15 [1]). Defendant was specifically told that no promises were being made as to sentencing and that he could receive consecutive prison terms. Therefore, there was no abuse of discretion by County Court in sentencing defendant to consecutive prison terms of one year each *(see, People v Bailey,*156 AD2d 846, *lv denied*75 NY2d 810; *People v Mackey,*136 AD2d 780, *lv denied*71 NY2d 899).

Mahoney, P. J., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, T.H. CAMPBELL, T.J. STINSON

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

COMPTON A. SMITH

SERGEANT (E-5), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201500308

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 21 May 2015.

Military Judge: LtCol David Jones, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, Marine Corps 

Recruit Depot/Eastern Recruiting Region, Parris Island, SC.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: Capt C.J. Fuller, 

USMC.

For Appellant: Maj Emmett Collazo, USMCR.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

10 March 2016

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

 For the Court 

 R.H. TROIDL 

 Clerk of Court
Tahle 2b1

Percentøge ol MÍlk ín CountÍes wíth Four or More Paying Hsndlers

December 2008

State I State Code I Percentage

IA

11 .

IN

KS

KY

LA

MA

MD

ME

MI

MN

MO

NC

NE

NH

NJ

NM

NY

OH

OK

OR

PA

SD

TN

TX

VA

VT

WI

WV

73.8O%o

27.48o/o

48.8LTo

27.67/o

5t.23Yo

3O.29o/o

21.33/o

7O.30o/o

91.O7lo

7O.L7lo

88.O9%

46.48/o

45.72o/o

2.95o/o

55.79%

38.7tYo

24.73%o

95.65Yo

68.65/o

Lt.58%

43.28o/o

96.36To

tO.89o/o

34.O8o/o

38.980/o

70.92%

97.!?Yo

99.56%

t3.65%

L9

L7

18

20

2L

22

25

24

23

26

27

29

37

31

33

34

35

36

39

40

4t

42

46

47

48

51

50

55

54

Prepared by:

Ma rket Administrator's Office

M inneapolis, M innesota

November 2009

1. For each state, the total milk pooled on Federal orders, from counties meeting the criteria divided by total milk

pooled on Federal orders.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40809

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARMANDO GONZALEZ-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-281-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando GonzalezGarcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Garcia has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40809 Document: 00513013041 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
No. 14-40809

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-40809 Document: 00513013041 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015