T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B A L J I T S I N G H S A N G A , a .k .a . B a ljit S i ng h S angh a, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70459 A ge nc yN o. A 031- 129- 576 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B al j i tS i ng h S anga, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f I nd i a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of an order of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s ( “ B IA ”) di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f oraw a i ve rof in a d m is s ib ilityu n d e rf

o rm e rs e c tio n 2 1 2 ( c ) o f th e I m m ig r a tio n a n dN a tio n a lity



# FI LED MA R 24 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70459 2 A c t , 8 U . S. C. § 1 1 8 2 ( c ) ( r e p e a l e d1 9 9 6 ) . O u rj u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U . S. C. § 1252. W e r e vi e w f

ors ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e f a c tua l f i ndi ngs a nd r e vi e w de novo q u e s tio n s o f

law . A bebe v. G on zales , 43 2 F . 3d 10 37 , 10 39 -40 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( en b a n c ) . We d e n yi n p a rta n dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B IA di d n oterr i n fai l i ng t o con si der I nd i an l aw . A s the B IA re co g n ized , i n d en yin g re li ef th e I J r eliedup o n th e in co n sisten cies inS an g a’s t es t i m on y r egar di ng ho w hi s s ec on d m arri age w as t erm i nat ed, no ton w hether S a nga ’ s s e c ond m a rr i a ge w a s a c tua l l yt e rm i na t e d unde rI ndi an l aw . M or e ove r , the que s t i on of

w ha tI ndi a n l a w pr ovi de s i s aque s t i on of f a c ttha tthe B I A c oul d not c o n s id e ro n ap p e a l. Se e M a t te ro f Ko dwo , 24 I. & N . D ec . 47 9, 48 2 (B IA 20 08 ). C ontr a ryt o S a nga ’ s c ont e nt i on, the B I A pr ovi de d an a de qua t e e xpl ana t i on f ori t s de c i s i on. T he B I A c i t e d M at te rof B ur bano , 20 I. & N . D ec . 87 2 (B IA 1994) , a nd di d note xpr e s s di s a gr e e m e ntw i th anypartof the I J ’ s de c i s i on, a nd the r e bya dopt e d the I J ’ s de c i s i on i n i t s e nt i r e ty , i nc l udi ng the I J ’ s e xpl ana t i on f or d e n y in g S a n g ar e lie f

. Se e A be be , 432 F . 3d a t1039- 40. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s di sc re t i on ary deni alof re l i ef unde rf orm e rs e c t i on 212( c ) unl e s s the pe t i t i one rr a i s e s a“ c ol or abl e ” que s t i on of law o rac o n s titu tio n a l q u e s tio n . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( ii) , ( D ) ; V a rg a sH erna ndezv. G on zales , 4 9 7 F .3 d9 1 9 , 9 2 1 , 9 2 3 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 7 ). S an g a’s09- 70459 3 cont ent i on thatsubst ant i alevi dence does notsupp ortthe fi nd i ng thathe perj ured h im s e lf r a is e s aq u e s tio n o f

f a c t, D a m a i

z e -J o b v . I NS , 7 8 7 F .2 d1 3 3 2 , 1 3 3 8 ( 9 th C i r . 1986) ( c r e di bi l i tyi s af a c tua l f i ndi ng) , a s doe s S anga ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe a g e n c yf a ile dto c o n s id e rth e to ta lityo f th e e v id e n c e in d e n y in g h im r e lie f . A c c o r d in g ly , w e la c kju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w th e s e c o n te n tio n s . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( ii) , ( D ) ; V arga s-H erna ndez , 4 9 7 F .3 da t 9 2 3 . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.