alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VELVA L. PRICE, District Clerk, Travis County Courthouse, Third Floor 

RECEIPT AND EXECUTION OF MANDATE FROM 

THE COURT OF APPEALS 

BY THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT CLERK

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk April 17, 2015 

Court of Appeals 

Third District of Texas 

P.O. Box 12547 

Austin, Texas 78711-2547 

Criminal Division 

P.O. Box 679004, 

Austin, Texas, 78767 

Re: No. 03-14-00543-CR

(Trial Court No.D-1-DC-13-203348) 

Styled: KEVIN PICHARDO

vs. 

The State of Texas 

Dear Mr. Kyle: 

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 87(b)(1), I hereby forward my acknowledgment 

of the receipt and the execution of the mandate on APRIL 17, 2015 from the Court of Appeals in 

the above cause. The official execution of this mandate is recognized by the Travis County 

Sheriff whereas the capias after mandate, official notice of mandate, or transfer of inmate to 

proper authorities, has been executed and or is in the process of being executed hereby placing 

the defendant within the proper jurisdiction of the trial court. 

Respectfully, 

VELVA L. PRICE

District Clerk 

Travis County, Texas 

 

By: _________________________________ 

 Deputy,JESSICA CONTRERAS 

C23 - 000001029
May 1, 2008

27550, 27679

#### Johnson v. Johnson

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection
with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2022 (the “Report”), I, John A Hardy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Dated: August 12, 2022





|EQUUS TOTAL RETURN, INC.
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ John A. Hardy       
|John A. Hardy           
|Chief Executive Officer
July 28, 1998

21320

#### Eline v. Abbott

Affirmed
IV 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 115 

Recognizing the cultural and historical significance of Lunar New Year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2015 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Ms. CHU of California, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. 

CROWLEY, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. HONDA, Mr. LIEU of California, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. ISRAEL, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. PETERS, Ms. 

BORDALLO, Ms. TITUS, and Ms. LEE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the cultural and historical significance of Lunar 

New Year. 

Whereas Lunar New Year begins on the second new moon 

following the winter solstice, or the first day of the new 

year according to the lunisolar calendar, and extends 

until the full moon 15 days later; 

Whereas the 15th day of the new year, according to the 

lunisolar calendar, is called the Lantern Festival; 

Whereas Lunar New Year is often referred to as ‘‘Spring 

Festival’’ in various Asian countries; 

Whereas many religious and ethnic communities use lunarbased calendars; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 115 IH 

Whereas Lunar New Year began in China more than 4,000 

years ago and is widely celebrated in East and Southeast 

Asia; 

Whereas the Asian diaspora has expanded the Lunar New 

Year celebration into an annual worldwide event; 

Whereas Lunar New Year is celebrated by millions of Asian 

Americans, and by many non-Asian Americans, in the 

United States; 

Whereas Lunar New Year is celebrated with community activities and cultural performances; 

Whereas participants celebrating Lunar New Year travel to 

spend the holiday reuniting with family and friends; and 

Whereas Lunar New Year is traditionally a time to wish 

upon others good fortune, health, prosperity, and happiness: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the cultural and historical signifi3 cance of Lunar New Year; 

4 (2) in observance of Lunar New Year, expresses 

5 its deepest respect for Asian Americans and all indi6 viduals throughout the world who celebrate this sig7 nificant occasion; and 

8 (3) wishes Asian Americans and all individuals 

9 who observe this holiday a happy and prosperous 

10 new year. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE III

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

Article 33

1.   An amount of EUR 449,4 million (current prices) in commitment appropriations shall be reserved for Croatia under the Structural and Cohesion Funds in 2013.

2.   One third of the amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be reserved for the Cohesion Fund.

3.   For the period covered by the next financial framework, the amounts to be made available to Croatia in commitment appropriations under Structural and Cohesion funding shall be calculated on the basis of the Union acquis applicable at that time. These amounts shall be adjusted in accordance with the following phasing-in schedule:

acquis

| — | 70 % in 2014, |
| --- | --- |

—

70 % in 2014,

| — | 90 % in 2015, |
| --- | --- |

—

90 % in 2015,

| — | 100 % as of 2016. |
| --- | --- |

—

100 % as of 2016.

4.   Insofar as the limits of the new Union acquis allow, an adjustment shall be made to ensure an increase of funds for Croatia in 2014 of 2,33 times the 2013 amount, and in 2015 of 3 times the 2013 amount.

acquis

---
26696

#### State v. Grindling

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,734,000
<SECURITIES>                                 8,537,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,000
<PP&E>                                       2,271,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,814,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,012,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,544,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   117,730,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (104,262,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,468,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,665,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,457,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 30, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 30, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0451. KRIS GRICE v. KATHERINE REILLY.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

12CV2774
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ST EPHEN JAMES SCIPIO , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 3039 LT Case No. 2000

- 030453

- CFAES STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed September 1 3, 2 022 3.850 A ppeal f ro m the Circuit Court for Volusia County , J ames R. Clayton , J udge. Stephen James Scipio, Milton, pr o se

. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roc k Mc Guigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona B each, for

A ppellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. LAMBERT , C.J. , EVANDER and HARRIS , J J., concur

.
M E M O R A N D U M

To: File

From: John Ungvarsky , EPA Region IX, Air Planning Office

Date: January 2 8 , 201 3
Concerning: Conclu s ion that t he Maintenan ce Demonstration Does Not Rely on Implementation o f

Nonattainment N ew S ource R eview (NSR)

_____________________________ On January 17, 2013, John Ungvarsky sent an email t o Charles Anderson, Sacramento M etropolitan Air Qualit y Management D istrict, asking if the re was language in the Sacramento PM 10 Maintenance Plan that conclude d that the maintenance demonstration d oes not rely on implementation of nonattainment NSR because the plan applies standard growth factors to sta tionary source emissions and does not rely on NSR offsets to reduce the rate of increase in emissions over time from point sources

. On January 22, 2013, Charles Anderson called John Ungvarsky to confirm that , although the P lan d oes not contain the aforementioned language , the above statement is correct. Specifically, the maintenance demonstration in the Sacramento PM 10 Maintenance Plan d oes not rely on implementation of nonattainment NSR because the plan applies standard growth factors to sta tionary source emissions and does not rely on NSR offsets to reduce the rate of increase in emissions over time from point

sources

.
**Exhibit 15.4**

 

**LETTER OF CONSENT**

**MFC Industrial Ltd.** 1620 — 400 Burrard Street Vancouver, B.C. V6C 3A6 

We hereby consent to the use of our name and the inclusion of our report dated February 24, 2015 evaluating the petroleum and natural gas reserves of MFC Industrial Ltd. (our “Report”) as of December 31, 2014, in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual Report”). We hereby further consent to the use of information derived from our Report in the Annual Report and to the incorporation by reference of our Report in the Registration Statement 333-143183 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement 333-171009 on Form S-8.

Yours very truly,

**GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.**

 

Myron J. Hladyshevsky, P. Eng. Vice President

Dated: March 31, 2015Calgary, AlbertaCANADA
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 4.4



NUMBER        INCORPORATED IN THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA            SHARES

                         TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

                                                               CUSIP 899905 10 3


THIS CERTIFIES THAT
                                                                     899905 10 3

is the registered holder of

        FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES WITHOUT PAR VALUE

In the Capital of the above named Company subject to the Memorandum and
Articles of the Company transferable on the books of the Company by the
registered holder in person or by Attorney duly authorized in writing
upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.

This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent
and Registrar of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Company has caused this certificate to be signed on
its behalf by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers at
Vancouver, British Columbia.

                                     DATED



/s/
           President                 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED
                                     MONTREAL TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA VANCOUVER
                                     TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR



/s/
           Secretary                 By /s/
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                            Authorized Officer

  The Shares represented by this certificate are transferable at the offices
             of Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Vancouver, B.C.
Exhibit 11.0
<TABLE>

			     SHIVA CORPORATION
	       Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share (1)

<CAPTION>
			       Three months ended       Six months ended
			       ------------------       ----------------
			      June 28,    June 29,    June 28,    June 29,
			       1997        1996        1997        1996
			      --------    --------    --------    --------
Weighted Average Common and
  Common Equivalent Shares:

<S>                         <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>
Weighted Average Common
  Shares Outstanding During 
    the Period              29,128,123   28,541,041   29,049,872  28,185,953

Weighted Average Common
  Equivalent Shares                  -    3,525,482           -    3,109,845
			    ----------   ----------   ---------   ----------
			    29,128,123   32,066,523   29,049,872  31,295,798
			    ==========   ==========   ==========  ==========
Net Income (Loss)            ($996,000)  $4,975,000  ($9,366,000) $9,314,000

Primary Net Income (Loss)
    Per Share                   ($0.03)       $0.16       ($.032)      $0.30

<FN>



(1)  Fully diluted net income per share has not been separately presented, as
     the amounts would not be materially different from primary net income per
     share. Net loss per share excludes common equivalent shares because their
     effect is antidilutive.

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

 Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF PEANUTS

FOR RELEASE AT 1:30 P.M. CT October 29, 2019

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of peanuts. The peanuts were sold 

under Peanut Invitation No. 12 dated October 21, 2019.

Catalog 

Lot Catalog Location Purchaser Tons 

Sold

Bid Price 

(per ton) CCC Revenue

Peanut 

Type

Lot #32 Dublin, NC Georgia Farm Services 1,147.55 $332.50 $ 381,560.38 Virginia

Lot # 40 Mount Olive, NC Golden Grove USA, Inc 2,698.85 $335.00 $ 904,114.75 Virginia

Totals 3,846.40 $1,285,675.13
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00419

- CR

Quantana Harris

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 297th District Court

o f Tarrant Cou nty (1317835R )

November 26 , 2014

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment s . I t is ordered that the judgment s

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic
Report), I, Paul Genova, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |                                   
| | ----------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul Genova                   
| |                                   
| | Paul Genova                       
| | (Interim) Chief
 Executive Officer
| | August 13, 2009                   

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF

DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.


This certification is provided pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is filed with respect to
the annual report on Form 10-K (the
Form 10-K) for the year ended January 3,
2004 of Dole Food Company, Inc. (the
Issuer). I, David H. Murdock, Chairman of the
Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer,
certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                              
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the Form 10-K fully complies with
    the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
    78o(d)); and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the
    Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
    financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.          



| |                                                    
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ DAVID H. MURDOCK                               
| |                                                    
| | David H. Murdock                                   
| | Chairman, President and Chief Executive
    Officer

March 17, 2004
# C_2016202EN.01014401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/144 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/144

---

Article 216

1.   The Union may conclude an agreement with one or more third countries or international organisations where the Treaties so provide or where the conclusion of an agreement is necessary in order to achieve, within the framework of the Union's policies, one of the objectives referred to in the Treaties, or is provided for in a legally binding Union act or is likely to affect common rules or alter their scope.

2.   Agreements concluded by the Union are binding upon the institutions of the Union and on its Member States.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1335 

To provide that the production safety systems rule and the well control 

rule in section 250 of title 30, Code of Federal Regulations, shall have 

the same force and effect of law as if such rules had been enacted 

by an Act of Congress, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2019 

Ms. BARRAGA ́N (for herself, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, and Mr. CRIST) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide that the production safety systems rule and the 

well control rule in section 250 of title 30, Code of 

Federal Regulations, shall have the same force and effect 

of law as if such rules had been enacted by an Act 

of Congress, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Coasts, Oceans, 

5 And Seaside Towns Act’’ or the ‘‘Safe COAST Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1335 IH

1 SEC. 2. FORCE AND EFFECT OF PRODUCTION SAFETY SYS2 TEMS RULE AND THE WELL CONTROL RULE. 

3 Subparts D, E, F, G, H, and Q of section 250 of 

4 title 30, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on Jan5 uary 1, 2018), shall have the same force and effect of law 

6 as if such subparts had been enacted by an Act of Con7 gress. 

8 SEC. 3. STUDY ON BSEE OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS OPER9 ATIONS INSPECTION PROGRAM. 

10 The Secretary of the Interior shall contract with the 

11 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medi12 cine to complete, not later than 21 months after the date 

13 of the enactment of this Act, the study entitled ‘‘Review 

14 and Update of Bureau of Safety and Environmental En15 forcement Offshore Oil and Gas Operations Inspection 

16 Program’’ that the Secretary of the Interior had pre17 viously contracted with the National Academies of 

18 Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to complete. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 86 

To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and amendments to 

that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. MASSIE (for himself, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, 

Mr. GOHMERT, and Mr. PALAZZO) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and 

amendments to that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Students Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE GUN-FREE SCHOOL ZONES ACT OF 

6 1990 AND AMENDMENTS TO THAT ACT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 922 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended by striking subsection (q). 

9 (b) RELATED AMENDMENTS.— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 86 IH

1 (1) Section 921(a) of such title is amended by 

2 striking paragraphs (25) through (27) and redesig3 nating paragraphs (28), (29), and (32) through (35) 

4 as paragraphs (25) through (30), respectively. 

5 (2) Section 924(a) of such title is amended— 

6 (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘(k), 

7 or (q)’’ and inserting ‘‘or (k)’’; and 

8 (B) by striking paragraph (4) and redesig9 nating paragraphs (5) through (7) as para10 graphs (4) through (6), respectively. 

11 (3) The Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 

12 (18 U.S.C. 921 note, 922 note; section 1702 of Pub13 lic Law 101–647; 104 Stat. 4844–4845) is repealed. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS