alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01017701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/177 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/177

---

Article 300

1.   The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall be assisted by an Economic and Social Committee and a Committee of the Regions, exercising advisory functions.

2.   The Economic and Social Committee shall consist of representatives of organisations of employers, of the employed, and of other parties representative of civil society, notably in socio-economic, civic, professional and cultural areas.

3.   The Committee of the Regions shall consist of representatives of regional and local bodies who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly.

4.   The members of the Economic and Social Committee and of the Committee of the Regions shall not be bound by any mandatory instructions. They shall be completely independent in the performance of their duties, in the Union's general interest.

5.   The rules referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 governing the nature of the composition of the Committees shall be reviewed at regular intervals by the Council to take account of economic, social and demographic developments within the Union. The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt decisions to that end.

---
20176

#### Wong v. Wong

Affirmed
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Stormy L. Dean, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of *info*USA Inc.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: August 13, 2003    /s/ Stormy L. Dean
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2795

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Gary Penn

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________

 Submitted: December 1, 2014

Filed: December 12, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Gary Penn appeals after the District Court revoked his supervised release and

1

sentenced him within the Chapter 7 advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines

The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western

1

District of Missouri.
range to 12 months in prison. Penn’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed

a brief arguing that Penn’s sentence is substantively unreasonable. 

Upon careful review, we conclude that the District Court did not impose an

unreasonable revocation sentence. See United States v. Growden, 663 F.3d 982, 984

(8th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (describing appellate review of revocation sentences);

United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying a presumption

of substantive reasonableness to a revocation sentence within the Guidelines range). 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. We also grant

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw. 

______________________________

-2-
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

A. M., 

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2022-2235

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims 

in No. 1:21-cv-01157-TMD, Judge Thompson M. Dietz. 

______________________

O R D E R

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by 

Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the 

rules, it is 

Case: 22-2235 Document: 26 Page: 1 Filed: 06/06/2023
2 A. M. V. US

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same 

hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

June 6, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Date Jarrett B. Perlow 

Acting Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 6, 2023

Case: 22-2235 Document: 26 Page: 2 Filed: 06/06/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-10982

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERT DANIEL ARGUETA-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-25-1

Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Robert Daniel 

Argueta-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Argueta-Lopez has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 17, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-10982 Document: 00512665910 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2014
No. 13-10982

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-10982 Document: 00512665910 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2014
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Timothy Sherlock, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and VicePresident of Finance of ARI Network Services, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI NetworkServices, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: June 14, 2004 /s/ Timothy SherlockTimothy SherlockChief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and VP of Finance
No. 07-17-00026-CR

Victor Anthony Cruz

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

From the 372nd District Court

 of Tarrant County

August 1, 2017

Opinion by Chief Justice Quinn

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated August 1, 2017, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court is modified as set forth in the

opinion and affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have already been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350



(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce A. Williamson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                    
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ BRUCE A. WILLIAMSON                                            
|                     |  |     |  | Bruce A. Williamson Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Services

Federal Grain Inspection Service

Program Notices

10/01/2023

NUMBER DATE TITLE OPR

Disposal Date

FY 23

FGIS-PN-23-07 10-01-2023 Rescinding Program 

Directive 9180.86 

Inspection of Export 

Soybean and Wheat 

Lots for Canada Thistle 

Dated February 27, 

2019

FMD

FGIS-PN-23-06 7-01-2023 Special Grade, “High 

Moisture” and Contrasting Chickpeas in 

the class Chickpea/

Garbanzo Beans

FMD

FGIS-PN-23-05 6-05-2023 Sample Collection 

Responsibilities for 

Verifying the Accuracy of Moisture Meter 

Calibrations Crop Year 

2023

TSD

FGIS-PN-23-04 7-19-2023 Uniform Reporting of 

Samples Not Available 

for SIMS and STEP

QACD

FGIS-PN-23-03 4-17-2023 Entering A Unique 

Identifier for Weighing 

or Inspection in the 

Certificate Program

FMD

FGIS-PN-23-02 2-03-2023 National Export Soybean Sample Collection PlanFMD

FGIS-PN-23-01 10-06-2022 Completing Data Collection Documents FMD-OD

FY 22

FGIS-PN-22-05 5-26-2022 Approval of New Light 

Emitting DIODE (LED) 

Lamps 

TSD

FGIS-PN-22-03 5-11-2022 Transfer of Officially 

Sampled and Graded 

Bulk Milled/Brown Rice

FMD
FGIS Program Notices

NUMBER DATE TITLE OPR

Disposal Date

FY20

FGIS-PN-20-05 8-13-2020 Optional Corn Dockage Checktest ProcedureFMD

expiration 8-13-2021

FGIS-PN-20-04 6-08-2020 Ordering Plastic Bags, 

Coin Envelopes, Trifold Envelopes, Plastic 

Quart Bottles, and 

Plastic Cable Ties

FMD

FY 19

FGIS-PN-19-05 08-08-2019 Video Stowage Exam 

for River Barges

FMD

FGIS-PN-19-04 4-12-2019 Inspection of Flood 

Damaged Grain

FMD

FY 18

FGIS-PN-18-07 4/12/2019 Examination of Audit 

Trails of Scales Used 

for Official Weighing

FMD

FGIS-PN-18-05 3-29-2018 Soybean Systems Approach: Sampling and 

Testing Working Group 

Weed Seed Survey 

Protocol

FMD

FGIS-PN-18-03 12-28-2017 Approval of Formica 

920-58 Almond Laminate Work Surface

TSD

12-28-2018

FGIS-PN-18-02 11-14-2017 Near Infrared 

Trans-mittance (NIRT) 

Procedures for FOSS 

Infratec Nova

TSD

11-14-2018
FGIS Program Notices

NAME DATE TITLE OPR

FY17

FGIS-PN-17-04 9-11-2017 Approval of New Near 

Infrared Transmittance 

(NIRT) Instrument

TSD

9-11-2018

FY15

FGIS-PN-15-02 9-24-2015 Visual Reference Image Interpretive Line 

Prints

TSD

9-24-2016

FY 10

FGIS PN-10-03 10-19-2009 Additional Parameters 

for Automated Monitoring and Supervision of 

Official Weighing

FMD 

9-08-2012

FY 08

FGIS PN-08-03 02-06-2008 Changes to Certification ProceduresFMD

2-06-2018

FGIS PN-08-01 11-12-2007 Inspection Certificate 

Updates

FMD

11-12-08

FY 03

FGIS PN-03-06 9-04-2003 Issuance Retention 

Policy

Compliance

9-04-2015

FGIS PN-03-03 09-05-2003 Walk-Through Safety 

Inspections at Grain 

Elevators

Compliance

9-05-2005

FY 02

FGIS PN 02-01 1-8-2002 Bulk Identity-Preserved 

Inspection Plan

FMD

Retain per FMD

FY 99

FGIS PN 99-7 3-22-1999 Revised Retention 

Schedule for Licensing

FMD 

Retain until HB updated
Table 1. Surface Characteristics Around Redding Airport Meteorological Station

AERSURFACE

Sector Albedo

Bowen

Ratio

Surface

Roughness

Length

(meters) Albedo

Bowen

Ratio

Surface

Roughness

Length

(meters)

Winter Spring

1 0.52 0.48 0.37 0.16 0.51 0.64

2 0.52 0.48 0.205 0.16 0.51 0.452

3 0.52 0.48 0.205 0.16 0.51 0.456

4 0.52 0.48 0.052 0.16 0.51 0.17

5 0.52 0.48 0.027 0.16 0.51 0.112

6 0.52 0.48 0.019 0.16 0.51 0.101

7 0.52 0.48 0.008 0.16 0.51 0.047

8 0.52 0.48 0.008 0.16 0.51 0.035

9 0.52 0.48 0.008 0.16 0.51 0.037

10 0.52 0.48 0.007 0.16 0.51 0.048

11 0.52 0.48 0.006 0.16 0.51 0.05

12 0.52 0.48 0.094 0.16 0.51 0.242

Summer Fall

1 0.17 0.61 0.776 0.17 0.9 0.776

2 0.17 0.61 0.62 0.17 0.9 0.62

3 0.17 0.61 0.592 0.17 0.9 0.592

4 0.17 0.61 0.303 0.17 0.9 0.303

5 0.17 0.61 0.22 0.17 0.9 0.22

6 0.17 0.61 0.184 0.17 0.9 0.184

7 0.17 0.61 0.127 0.17 0.9 0.127

8 0.17 0.61 0.134 0.17 0.9 0.134

9 0.17 0.61 0.128 0.17 0.9 0.128

10 0.17 0.61 0.12 0.17 0.9 0.12

11 0.17 0.61 0.109 0.17 0.9 0.109

12 0.17 0.61 0.401 0.17 0.9 0.401
Table 2. Surface Characteristics Around SPI-Anderson Facility

AERSURFACE

Sector Albedo

Bowen

Ratio

Surface

Roughness

Length

(meters) Albedo

Bowen

Ratio

Surface

Roughness

Length

(meters)

Winter Spring

1 0.51 0.48 0.043 0.16 0.52 0.113

2 0.51 0.48 0.043 0.16 0.52 0.097

3 0.51 0.48 0.037 0.16 0.52 0.092

4 0.51 0.48 0.034 0.16 0.52 0.081

5 0.51 0.48 0.026 0.16 0.52 0.101

6 0.51 0.48 0.024 0.16 0.52 0.105

7 0.51 0.48 0.09 0.16 0.52 0.22

8 0.51 0.48 0.166 0.16 0.52 0.282

9 0.51 0.48 0.017 0.16 0.52 0.064

10 0.51 0.48 0.01 0.16 0.52 0.052

11 0.51 0.48 0.015 0.16 0.52 0.045

12 0.51 0.48 0.009 0.16 0.52 0.046

Summer Fall

1 0.17 0.55 0.154 0.17 0.89 0.154

2 0.17 0.55 0.128 0.17 0.89 0.128

3 0.17 0.55 0.123 0.17 0.89 0.123

4 0.17 0.55 0.112 0.17 0.89 0.112

5 0.17 0.55 0.171 0.17 0.89 0.171

6 0.17 0.55 0.168 0.17 0.89 0.168

7 0.17 0.55 0.295 0.17 0.89 0.295

8 0.17 0.55 0.393 0.17 0.89 0.393

9 0.17 0.55 0.139 0.17 0.89 0.139

10 0.17 0.55 0.116 0.17 0.89 0.116

11 0.17 0.55 0.143 0.17 0.89 0.143

12 0.17 0.55 0.1 0.17 0.89 0.1
Figure 1. Landuse Data Used to Develop Surface Characteristics for Redding Airport
Figure 2. Landuse Data Used to Develop Surface Characteristics for SPI-Anderson
Figure 3. Receptor Locations – Standard Domain
Figure 4. Receptor Locations – Expanded Domain for 1-Hour Average NO2 Modeling
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    APR-04-1998
<CASH>                          23,942
<SECURITIES>                    46,040
<RECEIVABLES>                   29,214
<ALLOWANCES>                     9,202
<INVENTORY>                     10,844
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               111,660
<PP&E>                          48,645
<DEPRECIATION>                  23,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 165,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           42,780
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                           303
<OTHER-SE>                     121,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   165,169
<SALES>                         38,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                38,031
<CGS>                           18,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   18,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                55,518
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   663
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (35,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                   (11,236)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (23,877)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                   (23,877)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (.80)
        

<PAGE>


</TABLE>
### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

August 9, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Repor ts - Supporting Documents for 2017- 2025 Light-Duty (LD) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Standards

FROM: Arvon L. Mitcham, Program Manager/Engineer

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

This memo covers two documents from the National Re newable Energy Laboratory (NREL) that were used to support the credit methodologies for a ir conditioning (A/C) and off-cycle, solar/thermal control technologies:

• NREL Technical Report #NREL/TP-540-42454 (January 2 008): “Vehicle Ancillary Load Reduction Project Close-Out Report: An Overvi ew of the Task and a Compilation of the Research Results;” J. Rugh and J. Farrington ( http://www.nrel.gov/vehiclesandfuels/ancillary_load s/pdfs/42454.pdf );

• NREL Technical Report #NREL/CP-540-40986 and SAE 20 07-01-1194 (April 2007): “Reduction in Vehicle Temperatures and Fuel Use fro m Cabin Ventilation, SolarReflective Paint, and a New Solar-Reflective Glazin g;” John P. Rugh, Lawrence Chaney, Jason Lustbader (National Renewable Energy Laborato ry), John Meyer (Visteon), Mukesh Rustagi, Kurt Olson (PPG Industries), Rupert Kogler (Webasto AG)
( http://www.nrel.gov/vehiclesandfuels/ancillary_load s/pdfs/40986.pdf )

Both documents are in the document and also publicl y available at the web addresses listed

above.
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D23- 2302 LT Case No. 2022

- CC

- 006451 -A

_____________________________ R UBEN S ANTOS C ASADO , A ppellant,

v.
J OSEPH R. D OHER , T IMOTHY S T

. G ORDON AND J OSEPH C ORBIN M C G INLEY , A ppellee s.

_____________________________

On appeal f

rom th e County Court for Lake County

. Carl a R. P epperman , J udge

. Rube n Santos Casado, Clermont , pr o se
. Tyler E. Mesmer, of Topouzis & Asso ciate s, P.C., Miami , for Appellee s.
A pril 5, 2024

L AMBERT , J.
R uben Santos Casado appeals the trial court’s unelaborated order that denied his Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) motion to vacate the final judgment entered in favor of Appellees and also denied his separate post

- judgment motion to impose certain sanctions against Appellees

. We affirm.2 Casado’s rule 1.540(b) motion asserted that the trial court committed “judicial error” in enter ing a judgment dismissing his complaint for f ailing to comply with a condition precedent to the filing of his subject breach of contract action

. Casado’s appeal lacks merit because j udicial error in a trial court’s ruling does not provide a basis for relief under this rule. See Curbelo v. Ullman , 571 So. 2d 443, 445 (Fla. 1990) ( holding that “ [m] istakes which result from oversight, neglect or accident are subject to correction under rule 1.540(b)(1)” but “judicial error

. . . is not one of the circumstances contemplated by the rule” ( citations omitted) )

. Stated slightly d ifferent ly , r ule 1.540(b) is not a substitute for appellate review of judicial error
. Bortz v. Bortz , 675 So. 2d 622, 624 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1996) (citation omitted)

. As to the appealed order’s denial of Casado’s motion to impose sanctions , our standard of review is abuse of discretion

. See Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum , 912 So. 2d 561, 573 (Fla. 2005) (“A lower court’s decision to impose sanctions is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.” (citation omitted) ). We conclude , without furthe r elaboration, that no abuse of discretion by the trial court has been shown on this record.
A FFIRMED

. E ISNAUGLE and P RATT , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________