alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                                        
              AMERICAN BUSINESS INFORMATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
           For the three and six months ended June 30, 1996 and 1995
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              Three Months Ended            Six Months Ended
                                                                   June 30                       June 30
                                                              ------------------           -------------------
                                                                1997       1996               1997       1996
                                                                ----       ----               ----       ----

<S>                                                           <C>        <C>               <C>         <C>
Average shares outstanding.................................    24,339     20,801             23,776     20,792
Net additional common equivalent shares....................       115        202                115        202
                                                              -------    -------           --------    -------

Average number of common and common equivalent
  shares outstanding.......................................    24,454     21,003             23,891     20,994
                                                              =======    =======           ========    =======

Net income for per share computation.......................   $ 2,910    $ 4,376           $(44,286)   $ 9,085
                                                              =======    =======           ========    =======

Net income per average common and common
   equivalent share outstanding............................   $  0.12    $  0.21           $  (1.85)   $  0.43
                                                              =======    =======           ========    =======

</TABLE>
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

HITESMAN, GASTON, and GEIS, 

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Tyler W. AYERS

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 201900107

Decided: 14 November 2019.

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Wilbur Lee, USMC. Sentence adjudged 24 January 2019 by a general court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, consisting of a military 

judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to 

E-1, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for 7 months,

and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander W. Scott Stoebner, JAGC, 

USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 
United States v. Ayers, No. 201900107

2

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply605Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Alice Marjorie Grove (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 11, 2022 - 8:33amYour mini-tour is wonderful and I am looking forward to more of them.   We need that now!  Thank you.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     5

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        17,400
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              17,400
<PP&E>                                        70,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                50,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                36,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,446,403
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                      350
<COMMON>                                       5,859
<OTHER-SE>                                (4,215,847)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  36,765
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             358,824
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            74,606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (433,430)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (433,430)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (433,430)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.07)



</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Matthews consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 **

U.S.C. § 636(c).

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERRENCE MATTHEWS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

OLIVIA CRAVEN; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-35553

D.C. No. 1:11-cv-00245-MHW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

Mikel H. Williams, Magistrate Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted October 9, 2012***

Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Terrence Matthews, an Idaho state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional

FILED

OCT 16 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-35553

violations in connection with his parole revocation and subsequent denial of

parole. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.

2000). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The district court properly dismissed the action because Matthews’s claims

are premised on his “actual innocence” and success on the merits of these claims

would necessarily imply the invalidity of his confinement. See Heck v. Humphrey,

512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). However, because the district court dismissed the

action with prejudice, we vacate the judgment in part, and remand for entry of

dismissal without prejudice. See Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa, 49 F.3d 583, 585

(9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (dismissals under Heck are without prejudice).

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.
##### 



Exhibit 31.11
  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
    CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS LIGHT
    COMPANY
    (required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
    Form 10-K
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e))
  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared; b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and    a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 1,
    2007
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable C, ii, 

County Attorney 

Kotley county 

Ilatador, Texas 

Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-7349 

Ro: 

"L 

*The Tax Colleator 

like to appbint 

ge of her duties 

Collector, enter 

of office as Tax 

office of County Treastion involves the construction of Article 

ich, with certain exceptions not here 

Wo person shall hold or exeraiee, at the 

~me tixie, more than on0 civil office of emOlUnent . . . .* 
577’ 

. 

Honorable 0. W. Horrid, Page 2 

In the case of Kirnbrough v, Barnett, 93 Tex. 310, 

5i S. Wr 122, ous Su~relae Court saidr 

Vuiilic office is the right, authority, and 

duty created and conferred by law by %iiich, for 

a given perioci @ither fixed by law or enduring at 

the pleasure of the creating powm, an individual 

is invested with eorae portion of the sovereign 

functions of the $overnment to b:> exercised by hirJ 

for the bonefit OP the public.* 

There aan be AQ qiwstioil that the position of County 

Treasurer is a aivir offietn of molument. Section l+,J+ of 

Article XVX of th* Coribt~tutlon provides for such office in 

title followirl& terra6I 

*The Le islature &hall prescribe the duties 

and provldo 8 of the OleUtiOA 

3 

the qualified 

voters of each county in this tate, of a county 

treasurer 6.. , . who shall have an office at the 

oountp seat, and hold their off&es-for two years, 

and until theirs suacesaors are qualified crud shall 

have sueh compensation as nay be provide A by la~.~ 

The Legislature prescribed ths~dutiea of such office 

in Title 36, R.C $3, 

It Is nettled that deputy sheriffs and deputy count 

alarks are public offioers of this State. Dongea v. Beall; Y 

s. W. 2d 5311 Sttite V. Brooks, 42 Tex. 62i Townea v. Harris, 

13 Tex, 5071 f:urray v. State, 67 8, Vi, 2d 274. Tkis office has 

P 

reviouely held iA Opinion No+ O-4963 that a deputy constable 

ikewise Is a public officer of th% State. By a parity of 

reaeoning and after consideration of Article 7252, the ArtW.e 

under which $e@y asaeseofa and aolleators are a?riointed we,feel 

that a deputy assessor and collector Is also a public officer, 

and that he holds a civil. office of eazolument under this State. 

Article 7252 providea, in part: 

Y!Zaoh Asreasor and Colbator of Taxes may appoint one or nore deputies to amSet hail in the 
aeseement Andy collection of taxes, and nay rquire 

such bond fron the person m a.::xdnted, aa he deem 

neatmary for hia fndemityj and the Asse.saor and 

Collector of Taxes ahall. in all cases be liable end 

accountable for the proceedinv aad misgonduct 

in office of hle’,~deputiee~ an8 the deputies appoint6d in aooordance tith the orovisions of this Art;iclr 

shall do and perfow al.1 the duties imposed and fo.- 

qpired by law of Amessors and Col.lect.xs .of ‘i&m j 

and all rots of maoh deputiee done in confomlty with 

law rhall, be ae binding and valid as if tine by the 

A&W&MIT ami Colleator of Tmcea in pereonr , . .” 

Zt hollow that the County Treasurer my not elao 

eerve ae (L Deputy Tax Collector. 

Your6 very truly 

I
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Vinod Gupta, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of *info*USA Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: November 13, 2003           */s/ Vinod Gupta*        Vinod GuptaChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                          69,209
<SECURITIES>                    33,843
<RECEIVABLES>                   46,233
<ALLOWANCES>                    21,797
<INVENTORY>                     16,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               150,193
<PP&E>                          38,376
<DEPRECIATION>                  13,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 177,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           28,175
<BONDS>                              0
<COMMON>                           290
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<OTHER-SE>                     148,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   177,755
<SALES>                         31,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                31,159
<CGS>                           21,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   21,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                23,859
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   469
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (13,499)
<INCOME-TAX>                    (5,129)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (8,370)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                    (8,370)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (0.29)
        

					
	  


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 987 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 987

To repeal the wage rate requirements commonly known as the Davis-Bacon 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2015

 Mr. King of Iowa (for himself, Ms. Jenkins of Kansas, Mr. Perry, Mr. 
 Franks of Arizona, Mr. Harper, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, and Mr. 
 Hensarling) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the wage rate requirements commonly known as the Davis-Bacon 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Davis-Bacon Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DAVIS-BACON WAGE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United 
States Code, is repealed.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law to a wage requirement of 
subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, shall 
after the date of the enactment of this Act be null and void.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND LIMITATION.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect 30 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act but shall not affect any contract in 
existence on such date of enactment or made pursuant to invitation for 
bids outstanding on such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6860

JAMES ALVIN BOULWARE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE V. LAUGHRUN, II, Private Attorney; ZORO J. GUICE, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-171-MU) Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 25, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Alvin Boulware, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James Alvin Boulware appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint brought under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) and 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Boulware v. Laughrun , No. CA-02-171-MU (W.D.N.C. filed May 15, 2002; entered Mary 16, 2002). We deny Boulware’s motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VIII

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

CHAPTER 2

MONETARY POLICY

Article 128

(ex Article 106 TEC)

(ex Article 106 TEC)

1.   The European Central Bank shall have the exclusive right to authorise the issue of euro banknotes within the Union. The European Central Bank and the national central banks may issue such notes. The banknotes issued by the European Central Bank and the national central banks shall be the only such notes to have the status of legal tender within the Union.

2.   Member States may issue euro coins subject to approval by the European Central Bank of the volume of the issue. The Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and the European Central Bank, may adopt measures to harmonise the denominations and technical specifications of all coins intended for circulation to the extent necessary to permit their smooth circulation within the Union.

---
NOTIFICATIONS

NOTIFICATIONS

NOTIFICATIONS

NOTIFICATIONS

Federal Grain Inspection Service

USGSA Report Tables

TYPE OF WAIVER

Emergency Grain Not

Sold by Grade

15,000

Metric Ton

High Quality

Specialty

Grain

QUARTER 1 REQUESTED

APPROVED

FISCAL YEAR

QUARTER 2 REQUESTED

APPROVED

QUARTER 3 REQUESTED

APPROVED

QUARTER 4 REQUESTED

APPROVED

2022

12

12

0

0 5 1

0

0

0

0 11 6

0

0

0

0 16 4

0

0

0

0 0 0

NOTE: While companies are required to save documentation on grain exported by seeding purposes,

grain shipped in bond, grain exported by rail/truck to Canada/Mexico and high quality specialty grain

shipped in containers, companies are only required to make the documentation available upon request for

review. FGIS does not have an active role in receiving and approving these type of waivers.

EXCEPTIONS Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4

REQUESTED 0 0 0 0

GRANTED 0 0 0 0