alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ck0001711799-ex101_6.htm



Exhibit 10.1



4839-7336-2022_3 010556.00236

 
ASSIGNMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
This Assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement (“Assignment”) is executed effective as of June 25, 2018 (the “Effective Date”), by and between THRE GLOBAL INVESTMENTS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignor”), and NR TACARA AT STEINER RANCH LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”).  

RECITALS:

A.Assignor and TASR Property Owner, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, heretofore entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement dated May 18, 2018 (the “Agreement”), for the purchase and sale of certain real property located at 4306 N Quinlan Park Road, Austin, Texas 78732, more fully-described in the Agreement.  Capitalized terms used but otherwise not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

 

B.Assignee is an entity that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with Assignor, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, or Nuveen Global Cities REIT, Inc.; and the term “control” means the power to direct the management of such entity through voting rights, ownership or contractual obligations. 

 

C.Assignor desires to assign and transfer to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the Agreement, and Assignee desires to accept such assignment and assume the rights and obligations of Assignor under the Agreement.

 

AGREEMENTS:

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor and Assignee hereby agree as follows:

1.Recitals.  The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated in their entirety.

2.Assignment.  Assignor hereby assigns and transfers to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the Agreement.  

3.Assumption.  Assignee hereby accepts the assignment and assumes the rights and obligations of Assignor under the Agreement. 

4.Execution in Counterparts.  This Assignment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original, and all of such counterparts shall constitute one Assignment.  To facilitate execution of this Assignment, the parties may execute and exchange by e-mail as a portable document format or other electronic imaging, counterparts of the signature page which shall be deemed original signatures for all purposes.

Executed as of the Effective Date.

 

 



Signature Page to Assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement 

ASSIGNOR:

THRE GLOBAL INVESTMENTS LLC, 

a Delaware limited liability company

 

By: /s/ Michael Gilmartin
Name: Michael Gilmartin

Title: Authorized Signor

 

 

ASSIGNEE:

NR TACARA AT STEINER RANCH LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

 

By:TH Real Estate Global Cities Advisors, LLC, 
       a Delaware limited liability company, 
       Its Investment Advisor

     By: /s/ Michael Gilmartin
     Name: Michael Gilmartin
     Title: Authorized Signer

 

 

 

S-1
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Fur Trade
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Allyn Cox

EverGreene Painting Studios

Materials
    Oil on Canvas

Year
    1994

Location
      
U.S. Capitol Building
          Cox Corridors

A longhouse of the northwest is decorated with paintings and set amid totems. Before the building, a fur trader is trading guns to the Native Americans for furs.About the Cox Corridors MuralsThe first floor of the U.S. Capitol's House wing is elaborately decorated with wall and ceiling murals by artist Allyn Cox. The western north-south corridor, called the Westward Expansion corridor, includes maps and scenes showing the growth of the United States from early exploration through the acquisition of Alaska and Hawaii. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
April 21, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, 

ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE 

COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND ALLSTATE FIRE & 

CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellants

NO. 14-13-00459-CV V.

REHAB ALLIANCE OF TEXAS, INC. D/B/A STEEPLECHASE FAMILY 

HEALTHCARE AND STEEPLECHASE PAIN MANAGEMENT & SURGICAL 

ASSOCIATES, SHEILA SMITH F/K/A SHEILA GOYER, DENNIS SMITH, D.C., 

THE DIAGNOSTIC & INJURY CENTER OF HOUSTON, LLC AND IHSAN 

SHANTI, M.D., Appellees

________________________________

This court today heard the motion for rehearing filed by appellants, Allstate 

Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Property & Casualty 

Insurance Company, Allstate County Mutual Insurance Company and Allstate Fire & 

Casualty Insurance Company. We order that the motion be OVERRULED, this court’s 

former judgment of December 9, 2014 be vacated, set aside, and annulled, and this 

court’s Memorandum Opinion of December 9, 2014 be withdrawn.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, signed December 

13, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and 

find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellants, Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company, 

Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Allstate County Mutual Insurance 

Company and Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, jointly and severally, to 

pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
18525

#### State v. Cunningham

Affirmed
#### Jeanette Ackerman, Individually and as Executrix of Helen Pruss, Deceased, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 35018.)

Court of Claims,

July 1, 1959.

*J eróme H. Raynor*and *Dean Higgins*for claimant.

*Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney-General (Paul Tully*of counsel), for defendant.

Richard S. Heller, J.

This action for $21,069.33 for the death and conscious pain and suffering of Helen Pruss, an inmate at the Buffalo State Hospital, is predicated on the negligence of the State of New York in that its employees and agents failed to give reasonable care in handling Helen Pruss, deceased, and further, that the State used inadequate and defective equipment which ultimately led to the death of decedent.

The contention of the claimant is that on July 10, 1957 Helen Pruss fell from a chair which was suddenly pushed by a fellow inmate in Buffalo State Hospital and that she received injuries which resulted in her death. The court rejects the theory that the State was negligent or that this incident was a proximate cause of Helen Pruss ’ death.

At the time of her admission to Buffalo State Hospital on January 7,1957, Helen Pruss was 72 years of age and a medical cripple. She was unable to care for herself and could not walk.

The history of claimant’s ailments indicates that she had been ill for most of her adult life with a multitude of diseases and afflictions.

On June 20, 1957, decedent was transferred to the medical ward and placed on the critical list. Miraculously, she recovered. On July 5, 1957, she slipped from the arms of a nurse who was helping her from a commode. She did receive some injuries as indicated by the hospital records and this fall could have hastened her death, but no negligence has been shown in either the care or the treatment of decedent.

*882The motion made by the Attorney-General at the close of the case is granted and the claim is dismissed.

The foregoing constitutes the written and signed opinion of the court upon which judgment may be entered. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 440.)

Let judgment be entered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 83143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26126]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group; Kidney, Urologic and 
Hematologic Diseases D Study Section.
    Date: March 5-7, 2024.
    Time: 5:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jason D. Hoffert, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney 
Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
496-9010, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f474049494a5d5b456f41464b4b440141464701484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="046c6b62626176706e446a6d60606f2a6a6d6c2a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 21, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-26126 Filed 11-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2297

JAMES LAWRENCE SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF ASHEVILLE; DET. SCOTT PIPER; HON. CALVIN HILL; HON. 

JULIE KEPPLE; HON. ED CLONTZ; HON. SAMUEL CATHEY; HON.

PATRICIA YOUNG; MARTHA ELIZABETH GRIST,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-00295-MR-DLH)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Lawrence Smith, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Lawrence Smith appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find 

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. 

City of Asheville, No. 1:14-cv-00295-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit32.2**

**CertificationPursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)**

**Of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18U.S.C. Section 1350**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of DynTek, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to Rule13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18U.S.C. Section1350, that based on my knowledge:

(1)          the Report of the Company filedtoday pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the applicable requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| Dated: November 20, 2006 | /s/ Mark E. Ashdown     |   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                     | Mark E. Ashdown         |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
y

MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-11-00333-CV

ANDREW WHALLON, DAHLIA GARCIA AND RICHARD GRAYSHAW, Appellants

V.

THE CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellee

Appeal from the 270th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2008-51588).

TO THE 270TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 5th day of February 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by 

the trial court on January 21, 2011. After submitting the case 

on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by 

the parties, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the portion of the trial court’s judgment entered against 

appellants Dahlia Garcia and Richard Grayshaw. 

Accordingly, the Court reverses this portion of the trial court’s 

judgment. The Court further renders judgment that appellee 

The City of Houston take nothing against appellants Dahlia 

Garcia and Richard Grayshaw.

The Court further holds that there was no reversible 

error in the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment. 
Therefore, the Court affirms the remaining portions of the trial 

court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Andrew Whallon, 

pay one half of the appellate costs. The Court orders that the 

appellee, The City of Houston, pay one half of the appellate 

costs. 

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered February 5, 2015.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings 

and Keyes. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Radack.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

April 17, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Genesco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending February 1, 2014 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Dennis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert J. DennisRobert J. DennisChief Executive OfficerApril 2, 2014
EXHIBIT 10(d)  


 Consent of RP Financial, LC  




May 3, 2002

 


        We
consent to the inclusion in this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Illini Corporation of our opinion to the Board of Directors of Illinois /Community
Bancorp, Inc. as set forth in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, which is part of the Registration Statement, and to the reference to our firm and summarization of our opinion in the Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus under the caption "Opinion of Independent Financial Advisor". 


Sincerely,



RP
FINANCIAL, LC 


    /s/
James P. Hennessey 


James
P. Hennessey

Senior Vice President 


111
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Contact Us
        
                  Form submissions are monitored Monday – Friday from 8 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. except on federal holidays.
First Name
Last Name
Email
Phone Number
Subject Type
        - Select -EmploymentFlag Request QuestionGeneral FeedbackImage RequestPressProcurement/BusinessProject: Cannon RenewalProject: OtherResearchTechnical Help
AOC.gov URL or Related Link
Message
** Required*
Cancel Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
EXHIBIT 11.1

           SUNRISE INTERANATIONAL LEASING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         PER SHARE EARNINGS COMPUTATIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three Months Ended              Nine Months Ended
                                               December 31, 1998               December 31, 1998
                                              1998            1997           1998           1997
                                          ----------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                       <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Basic Earnings Per Share:

   Weighted average number of
     common shares outstanding             7,585,000       7,788,000       7,736,000       7,616,000
                                          ----------------------------------------------------------

       Net income                         $  941,000      $  835,000      $2,444,000      $2,669,000
                                          ==========================================================
       Net income per common and
         common equivalent share          $     0.12      $     0.11      $     0.32      $     0.35
                                          ==========================================================

Fully Dilutive Earnings Per Share:

   Weighted average number of              7,585,000       7,788,000       7,736,000       7,616,000
   Common stock equivalents
     from assumed exercise of
     options and warrants                     40,000           6,000          31,000          15,000
                                          ----------------------------------------------------------
       Total shares                        7,625,000       7,794,000       7,767,000       7,631,000
                                          ==========================================================

       Net income                         $  941,000      $  835,000      $2,444,000      $2,669,000
                                          ==========================================================

       Net income per common
         and common equivalent share      $     0.12      $     0.11      $     0.31      $     0.35
                                          ==========================================================
</TABLE>

Net income per common and common equivalent share is computed using the weighted
average number of shares outstanding during each period.
20867

#### Credguard Corp. v. Kreizenbeck

Affirmed
# C_2016202EN.01035601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/356 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/356

---

56.   Declaration by Ireland on Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice

Declaration by Ireland on Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice

Ireland affirms its commitment to the Union as an area of freedom, security and justice respecting fundamental rights and the different legal systems and traditions of the Member States within which citizens are provided with a high level of safety.

Accordingly, Ireland declares its firm intention to exercise its right under Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice to take part in the adoption of measures pursuant to Title V of Part Three of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to the maximum extent it deems possible.

Ireland will, in particular, participate to the maximum possible extent in measures in the field of police cooperation.

Furthermore, Ireland recalls that in accordance with Article 8 of the Protocol it may notify the Council in writing that it no longer wishes to be covered by the terms of the Protocol. Ireland intends to review the operation of these arrangements within three years of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.

---