alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 16, 2015

NO. 03-14-00635-CV

Michael Leonard Goebel and all other occupants of 207 Cazador Drive, Appellants

v.

Sharon Peters Real Estate, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on September 18, 2014. Having 

reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the 

Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellants shall pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             765
<SECURITIES>                                       505
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,538
<PP&E>                                          85,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 445,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,883
<BONDS>                                        269,664
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   445,194
<SALES>                                        188,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,831
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,741
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,819
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,922
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    128
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,050
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27


</TABLE>
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0054 

Standard Review Draft 12/17/2008 

ENGINEER: Arnold \ CPW 

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE:

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No 

Gen Eqpt: safety glasses or goggles/ chemical resistant gloves 

and protective clothing/ adequate ventilation 

Respirator: follow OSHA respirator regulations 

Health Effects: Irritating to eyes and respiratory system/ 

slight skin irritation may occur/ may irritate gastrointestinal 

tract/ mucus membrane irritant 

TLV/PEL: 

none established 

CRSS : 

Chemical Name: [5,6]Fullerene-C60-Ih 

S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @ 

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ 

MW: 721.00 %<500 %<1000 

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: 

Neat: Solid Mfg: Proc/Form: End Use: 
Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (11/21/2008): 

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

. 

Migration to groundwater: U 

PBT rating: P3B1T1 LVE PBT Rating is P3 BU T1 

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation 

Eco: 1 No releases to Water 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: 

P2 Claim:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No 
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0054 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may 

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same 

medium. Note: Water not required per SAT. 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis:
Inhalation: 

Dermal: 
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0054 

Number of Sites/ Location:

Days/yr:

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may 

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same 

medium. Note: Water not required per SAT. 
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

Inhalation: 

Dermal: 
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0054 

Number of Sites/ Location:

unknown site(s) 

Days/yr:

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may 

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same 

medium. Note: Water not required per SAT. 
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

Inhalation:

Dermal:
EXHIBIT 15

                         ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                  REGARDING INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT



The Board of Directors
LaserSight Incorporated:

With respect to the registration statements on Form S-8 (nos. 33-96390,
33-52170, 333-16817, 333-16823, 333-62587, 333-62591, 333-84073, 333-84075, and
333-42662) and on Form S-3 (nos. 333-2198, 333-25237, 333-36655, 333-36837,
333-59369, 333-68495, 333-77825, 333-35822, 333-46470, 333-62634 and 333-67616)
of LaserSight Incorporated, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of
our report dated November 1, 2001 related to our review of interim financial
information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                        /s/KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
November 14, 2001
Order entered April 2 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00372

- CV

IN RE ANDREW DAVID M ALONE, JR., Relator

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F86

- 95910

- QN



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/David W. Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains  summary  information  extracted from the financial
     statements contained in Intelligent Decision Systems, Inc.'s Report on Form
     10-QSB for the quarter ended  September 30,  1996 and is  qualified  in its
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,205,299
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      582,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                         8,000
<INVENTORY>                                        160,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,229,829
<PP&E>                                             670,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                     260,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,663,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,031,346
<BONDS>                                            124,022
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,087,000
<COMMON>                                        12,011,244
<OTHER-SE>                                      (8,590,160)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,663,452
<SALES>                                             67,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   225,763
<CGS>                                              364,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      954,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (29,125)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12,690
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,077,679)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,077,679)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,077,679)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.08)
        


</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

VATESHEA ANORA CURE,

Appellant,

v.

LAGO FUNDING CORP.,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3555

[November 17, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Robert W. Lee, Judge; L.T. Case No. COCE21-050755.

Vateshea Anora Cure, Pembroke Pines, pro se.

Amanda C. Rolfe of Rolfe & Lobello, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2016202EN.01012701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/127

---

Article 176

(ex Article 160 TEC)

(ex Article 160 TEC)

The European Regional Development Fund is intended to help to redress the main regional imbalances in the Union through participation in the development and structural adjustment of regions whose development is lagging behind and in the conversion of declining industrial regions.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF INTERACTIVE NETWORK, INC. FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
2000, AS PRESENTED IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,605
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              578
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,966
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (219)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (510)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (511)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (511)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)




</TABLE>
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XVIII

ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND TERRITORIAL COHESION

ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND TERRITORIAL COHESION

Article 177

(ex Article 161 TEC)

(ex Article 161 TEC)

Without prejudice to Article 178, the European Parliament and the Council, acting by means of regulations in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, shall define the tasks, priority objectives and the organisation of the Structural Funds, which may involve grouping the Funds. The general rules applicable to them and the provisions necessary to ensure their effectiveness and the coordination of the Funds with one another and with the other existing Financial Instruments shall also be defined by the same procedure.

A Cohesion Fund set up in accordance with the same procedure shall provide a financial contribution to projects in the fields of environment and trans-European networks in the area of transport infrastructure.

---
Agricultural Marketing Service, Specialty Crops Program, Specialty Crops Inspection Division

This PATCH represents official guidance. This PATCH is scheduled to be incorporated into the 

document listed above. After incorporation into the document listed above this PATCH will 

become obsolete. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

PATCH # 044 Late Blight Tuber Rot on Potatoes (February 21, 2019)

SCI Division Inspection Series

Page 1 of 1

PATCH # 044

DOCUMENT: Potatoes Shipping Point and Market Inspection Instructions April 2012

REMARKS: This PATCH supersedes a memo for “Scoring Late Blight Tuber Rot on Potatoes” 

issued by the Standardization and Training Branch on June 25, 2012. The scoring guide for 

“Late Blight Tuber Rot (C),”page 65 in the current Potatoes Shipping Point and Market 

Inspection Instructions, is revised to read as follows:

Scoring Guide

Always serious damage: All U.S. grades require potatoes to be free from late blight. Score any 

amount against the restricted tolerance for external defects. When late blight has advanced to the 

soft rot stage, report as “Soft rot” against the restrictive tolerance for soft rot.

Visual Aids: Refer to Photos 32 to 34.
U. S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency

NOTICE OF SALE OF WHEAT

FOR RELEASE AT 1:30 P.M. CT June 1, 2017

USDA’s Farm Service Agency today announced the sale of Hard Red Winter (HRW) Wheat. The HRW Wheat was sold under 

Announcement SMAC3, Invitation No. 4 dated May 23, 2017.

Lot 

Number

Warehouse 

Location Purchaser Bushels Sold

Bid Price 

(per Bushel) CCC Revenue Commodity Type

1 Wright, KS Alliance Ag & Grain LLC 13,252.17 $3.40 $45,057.38 HRW Wheat

2 Edison, NE Ag Valley Co-op 6,387.55 $3.60 $22,995.18 HRW Wheat

3 Hays, KS Midland Marketing Co-op 1,503.60 $3.38 $5,082.17 HRW Wheat

4 Concordia, KS AgMark LLC 684.00 $3.30 $2,257.20 HRW Wheat

Totals 21,827.32 $75,391.93
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

594 

CAF 14-01955 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF LUCILLE A. SOLDATO, 

COMMISSIONER, ONEIDA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF 

SOCIAL SERVICES, ON BEHALF OF JOHANN BENSON, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RAYMOND BENSON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

RICHARD P. FERRIS, UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Randal

B. Caldwell, J.), entered February 26, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant

to Family Court Act article 4. The order denied the objections of

petitioner to an order of a Support Magistrate. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the objections are

granted, the petition is granted, and respondent is directed to pay

child support in the amount of $26 per week retroactive to September

12, 2013. 

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding on behalf of

the mother of the children at issue seeking an order directing

respondent father to pay child support. The Support Magistrate

calculated respondent’s presumptive support obligation at $26 per

week, but determined that respondent was not obligated to pay support

because he had physical custody of the children for a majority of the

time under his custody arrangement with the mother and was thus not a

noncustodial parent within the meaning of Family Court Act § 413 (1)

(f) (10) (see generally Rubin v Della Salla, 107 AD3d 60, 67-68). 

Family Court denied petitioner’s objections to the order of the

Support Magistrate, and petitioner appeals. 

We conclude that, contrary to the determination of the Support

Magistrate, the custody order between respondent and the mother is

intended to divide physical custody of the children equally (see

Redder v Redder, 17 AD3d 10, 13; cf. Rubin, 107 AD3d at 68-71). 

Respondent, as the parent with the higher income and greater pro rata

share of the child support obligation, is therefore the noncustodial

parent for support purposes (see Leonard v Leonard, 109 AD3d 126, 128-

129; Matter of Moore v Shapiro, 30 AD3d 1054, 1055), and should have

been ordered to pay child support to the mother. In addition, we

agree with petitioner that the children’s receipt of public assistance
-2- 594 

CAF 14-01955 

precludes respondent from obtaining any reduction of his support

obligation based on expenses incurred while he has custody of the

children (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [f] [9]; Matter of Pandozy v

Gaudette, 192 AD2d 779, 780). Consequently, we reverse the order,

grant petitioner’s objections, grant the petition, and direct

respondent to pay child support in the amount of $26 per week

retroactive to September 12, 2013, the date on which the children

became eligible for public assistance (see § 449 [2]; Matter of Davis

v Swain, 281 AD2d 545, 545; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of

City of N.Y. v Daryl S., 235 AD2d 126, 130). 

Entered: May 8, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          31,749
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                       954
<INVENTORY>                                     96,324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               197,233
<PP&E>                                         404,127
<DEPRECIATION>                                 273,907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 355,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,061
<BONDS>                                         18,860
<COMMON>                                        21,909
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     197,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   355,779
<SALES>                                        376,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               376,279
<CGS>                                          267,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  341,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   896
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    65
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,177
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,686
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,491
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.52
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016202EN.01002301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/23

---

Article 15

1.   The European Council shall provide the Union with the necessary impetus for its development and shall define the general political directions and priorities thereof. It shall not exercise legislative functions.

2.   The European Council shall consist of the Heads of State or Government of the Member States, together with its President and the President of the Commission. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy shall take part in its work.

3.   The European Council shall meet twice every six months, convened by its President. When the agenda so requires, the members of the European Council may decide each to be assisted by a minister and, in the case of the President of the Commission, by a member of the Commission. When the situation so requires, the President shall convene a special meeting of the European Council.

4.   Except where the Treaties provide otherwise, decisions of the European Council shall be taken by consensus.

5.   The European Council shall elect its President, by a qualified majority, for a term of two and a half years, renewable once. In the event of an impediment or serious misconduct, the European Council can end the President's term of office in accordance with the same procedure.

6.   The President of the European Council:

| (a) | shall chair it and drive forward its work; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

shall chair it and drive forward its work;

| (b) | shall ensure the preparation and continuity of the work of the European Council in cooperation with the President of the Commission, and on the basis of the work of the General Affairs Council; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

shall ensure the preparation and continuity of the work of the European Council in cooperation with the President of the Commission, and on the basis of the work of the General Affairs Council;

| (c) | shall endeavour to facilitate cohesion and consensus within the European Council; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

shall endeavour to facilitate cohesion and consensus within the European Council;

| (d) | shall present a report to the European Parliament after each of the meetings of the European Council. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

shall present a report to the European Parliament after each of the meetings of the European Council.

The President of the European Council shall, at his level and in that capacity, ensure the external representation of the Union on issues concerning its common foreign and security policy, without prejudice to the powers of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.

The President of the European Council shall not hold a national office.

---