alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Julia HEADLEY, Administratrix of the Estate of Albert Headley, Appellant, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 7952.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1939.

Harrison & Marshman, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before HICKS, ALLEN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case was heard upon the transcript of the record and brief and argument of counsel for appellant,

On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that the order appealed from, entered July 31, 1937, be and the same is reversed upon the authority of Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. De Leone, 6 Cir., 289 F. 201, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
# C_2016202EN.01011001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/110 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/110

---

Article 143

(ex Article 119 TEC)

(ex Article 119 TEC)

1.   Where a Member State with a derogation is in difficulties or is seriously threatened with difficulties as regards its balance of payments either as a result of an overall disequilibrium in its balance of payments, or as a result of the type of currency at its disposal, and where such difficulties are liable in particular to jeopardise the functioning of the internal market or the implementation of the common commercial policy, the Commission shall immediately investigate the position of the State in question and the action which, making use of all the means at its disposal, that State has taken or may take in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties. The Commission shall state what measures it recommends the State concerned to take.

If the action taken by a Member State with a derogation and the measures suggested by the Commission do not prove sufficient to overcome the difficulties which have arisen or which threaten, the Commission shall, after consulting the Economic and Financial Committee, recommend to the Council the granting of mutual assistance and appropriate methods therefor.

The Commission shall keep the Council regularly informed of the situation and of how it is developing.

2.   The Council shall grant such mutual assistance; it shall adopt directives or decisions laying down the conditions and details of such assistance, which may take such forms as:

| (a) | a concerted approach to or within any other international organisations to which Member States with a derogation may have recourse; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

a concerted approach to or within any other international organisations to which Member States with a derogation may have recourse;

| (b) | measures needed to avoid deflection of trade where the Member State with a derogation which is in difficulties maintains or reintroduces quantitative restrictions against third countries; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

measures needed to avoid deflection of trade where the Member State with a derogation which is in difficulties maintains or reintroduces quantitative restrictions against third countries;

| (c) | the granting of limited credits by other Member States, subject to their agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the granting of limited credits by other Member States, subject to their agreement.

3.   If the mutual assistance recommended by the Commission is not granted by the Council or if the mutual assistance granted and the measures taken are insufficient, the Commission shall authorise the Member State with a derogation which is in difficulties to take protective measures, the conditions and details of which the Commission shall determine.

Such authorisation may be revoked and such conditions and details may be changed by the Council.

---
25844

#### State v. Edralin

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 11


<TABLE>

                                 BAREFOOT INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON AND
                            COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE




                                              THREE MONTHS                NINE MONTHS
                                           ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,        ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                           1996          1995          1996         1995
                                          ------        ------        ------       ------

<S>                                    <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>        
NET INCOME                             $ 8,128,134   $ 7,603,331   $12,196,170   $12,479,954
                                       -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------

SHARES:
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period           14,511,586    15,229,717    14,616,681    15,811,635

Shares issuable upon the exercise of
    stock options less shares
    repurchasable from the proceeds         18,395        78,733        29,079        83,975
                                       -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
   Common and common equivalent
    shares outstanding                  14,529,981    15,308,450    14,645,760    15,895,610
                                       -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------

EARNINGS PER  COMMON
SHARE                                  $       .56   $       .50   $       .83   $       .79
                                       -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 30, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 30, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0451. KRIS GRICE v. KATHERINE REILLY. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 12CV2774
31 P.3d 243

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Kurashige

23097

07/05/2001

Affirmed
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-810

_____________________________

MARCUS SERNARD BLAND,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County.

Timothy Register, Judge.

September 13, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.1


 Fiscal 2018 Executive Incentive Plan. On June 28, 2018, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of American Superconductor Corporation (the “Committee”) and the Board of Directors of American Superconductor Corporation (the “Company”) approved an executive incentive plan for the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2019 (“fiscal 2018”). Participants in the plan include the Company’s chief executive officer, all other current executive officers and James F. Maguire, a former executive officer who was a named executive officer in our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 15, 2018. Pursuant to the plan, each participant is designated a target cash incentive amount, expressed as a percentage of the participant’s base salary. The Committee is responsible for determining the payout under the plan to each participant except the chief executive officer. The Board of Directors of the Company determines the payout under the plan for the chief executive officer, taking into account the recommendation of the Committee. 
The amount of the incentive award actually paid to each participant may be less than or greater than the participant’s target cash incentive, with the amount capped at 200% of the target incentive. For each participant, individual incentive awards will be determined following the end of fiscal 2018 based on the following factors and their corresponding weightings: 
 
	
				
	 
	•
	 
	the Company’s operating cash flow for fiscal 2018 as compared to the established target – 50%




 
	
				
	 
	•
	 
	the participant’s achievement of other financial objectives relating to operating income (loss), revenues and operating expenses during fiscal 2018 as compared to the established target – 30%




 
	
				
	 
	•
	 
	the participant’s individual and overall contribution during fiscal 2018 towards the achievement of the Company’s financial and non-financial objectives (subjective performance measure) – 20%




The following table sets forth the target cash incentive for fiscal 2018 for each current executive officer and Mr. Maguire: 
 
	
							
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Executive Officer
	Title
	Target Incentive 
as % of 
Base Salary
	 
	 
	Target   Incentive

	Daniel P. McGahn
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	100
	%
	 
	$
	500,000

	John W. Kosiba, Jr.
	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	50
	%
	 
	$
	125,000

	James F. Maguire
	Executive Vice President, Technology
	40
	%
	 
	$
	90,000
May 21, 2008

27274

#### AFL Hotel & Restaurant Workers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Ramos

Vacated and Remanded
EXHIBIT 24.11
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


The  undersigned,  as  Controller  of Public  Service  Company of Oklahoma  (the
"Company"), hereby makes, constitutes and appoints T. D. Churchwell his true and
lawful  attorney-in-fact  and agent, with full power and authority to execute in
the  name and on  behalf  of the  undersigned,  in any and all  capacities,  the
Company's  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K  for  1999  and any and all  amendments
thereto, to be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and
any  other  documents  and  instruments  incidental  thereto,  and to  file  the
same,with all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection  therewith,  with
the   Securities   and   Exchange   Commission,    hereby   granting   to   such
attorney-in-fact,  and  agent,  full power and  authority  of  substitution  and
revocation  in the premises and full power and  authority to do and perform each
and every  act and thing  requisite  and  necessary  to be done in and about the
premises,  as fully for all intents and  purposes  as the  undersigned  might or
could  do  in  person  and  hereby   ratifying  and  confirming  all  that  such
attorney-in-fact  and agent,  may do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power
of Attorney.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have hereunto  executed this Power of Attorney this 18th
day of January, 2000.


                                                /s/ R. Russell Davis
                                                R. Russell Davis
                                                Controller



Subscribed and sworn to before me this 18th day of January, 2000 by R.
Russell Davis.

                                                /s/ Kit Hill
                                                Notary Public
                                                State of Oklahoma

My Commission Expires:  June 14, 2001
' '· 

.; ~~l.,dt'~vVL*-~ . ~c_x_t_n, L{ ~ l ~- LcL'S: __ 

-----------,------L~C>aDA~6.., b-"k~f\:M- ~ ~1-~:Z: ~ ~-

-l~\;r~cm-~~~\9 ~1.-~'e~_tiue"'·JS-~~;-ES:\_'l..._&~ ~~ t>cc-<h~~~;1~'--c-

--r}L_-::J_f.c.$"g_-7 .. --=~-rl!~2.--~_v..,_~~-~ts.~5-*~ ~~ ~-

-~SP-L~-l;j-'*"=~-~\-~ ~-~-lA,)kJ..~_,_t..\..~~-~±k~-~-\~\c._ 

-~-~-~~~~k---------~------------------------

-------------------------~~{2t~1~j------

-----------~~,~~~~~l~-----

---------------------------ll~\7&7~~~---------

--------------~---~~~~s~~~--.--~~--

--:----------------------'-~-"'L-'RcY..~oo..__· ___ __ 

• ------------------~CL~S\.}~\~-,.:&:z-45~2----

~CEIVED IN . COURT OF CRIIllllf'JAL APPEALS 

APR 20 2015 

Ab~l Acosta, Clerk 

f 

'
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0331. WILHY HARPO v. MORDENA BOLT.

On March 23, 2015, WilhyHarpo filed this application for discretionary appeal

from a state court order dismissing his de novo appeal in this dispossessory case.1 We

lack jurisdiction.

Harpo’s application statesthat he is appealing from an order “filed and entered

on February 6, 2015 which dismissed Harpo’s said direct de novo appeal.” Harpo

included a copy of the trial court’s order, signed on February 6, but it was not a

stamped “filed” copy as required by Court of Appeals Rule 31 (e). A stamped “filed”

copy is required in order for this Court to ascertain that the application was filed

within seven days, which is a jurisdictional prerequisite. OCGA § 44-7-56; Ray M.

Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521 (521 SE2d 456) (1999). On March 25, 2015

thisCourt ordered Harpo to supplement his application within 10 days with a stamped

“filed” copy of the order to be appealed. We noted that failure to comply with this

directive would result in dismissal of the application. More than 10 days have passed

since we issued the March 25, 2015 order, but Harpo has not submitted a stamped

“filed” copy of the trial court’s order. Accordingly, his application is hereby

DISMISSED.

1 We note that the trial court apparently has listed the appellee as Mordena

Bolt, Mordena Belt and Mordena Bolden on various court orders and its case

summary docket sheet.

April 17, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/17/2015
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
CDI Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-112088) on Form S-8 of CDl Corp. of our report dated February 24, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CDl Corp. as of December 31,
2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders' equity, cash flows, and comprehensive income for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, and the related financial
statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report
on Form 10-K of CDl Corp.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 12, 2004
Opinion issued August 22 , 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 23 - 00917 - CV

——————————— ZE RUN, NEW APARTMENT (USA) BUSINESS RESORT MANAGEMENT, LTD., HARMONY GROWTH CULTURE MEDIA (US)

LLC, AND QING QING LI , Appella nt s

V. JUNSHUO XU AND CNUS LINKING LTD. , Appell e e s On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2019 - 42834
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants, Ze Run, New Apartment (USA) Business Resort Management, Ltd., Harmony Growth Culture Media (US) LLC, and Qing Qing Li, and appellees, Junshuo Xu and Cnus Linking Ltd., have filed a joint motion to reverse and render,2

stating that the parties have settled and to effectuate that settlement, the parties ask this Court to reverse and render a take

- nothing judgment under Rule 42.1(a)(2)(A). See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(2)(A) (permit ting appellate court to render judgment in accordance with settlement agreement)
. Because this Court lacks a copy of the settlement agreement, we construe the motion as requesting reversal and remand to the trial court. Construing the parties’ joint motion as a joint motion to reverse and remand, we grant the motion . We reverse the trial court’s judgment of September 12, 2023 and re mand the cause to the trial court to render judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement . Any other pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Rivas

- Molloy.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAEL ANDREW FOREMAN,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-13-00042-CR

Appeal from the

County Crim Ct No 9

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 1196029)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until August 2, 2013. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Abe Factor, the Appellant’s Attorney, prepare the 

Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 2, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of July, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. &1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. &1350), the
undersigned,  Joseph V. Roberts, Chief Executive Officer of Nutrition Management
Services  Company,  a  Pennsylvania  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2003 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                       /s/ Joseph V. Roberts
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Joseph V. Roberts
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

 May 20, 2003
```
# Kansas_county_differentials_202
**EXHIBIT      32**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted **

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                April 2, 2007 | **/S/                DORRIT J. BERN**                |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                | Dorrit                J. Bern                        |
|                                | Chairman                of the Board                 |
|                                | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                |                                                 |
| Dated:                April 2, 2007 | **/S/                ERIC M. SPECTER**               |
|                                | Eric                M. Specter                       |
|                                | Executive                Vice President              |
|                                | Chief                Financial Officer               |
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Boris Zilbermints , Chief Executive Officer of Chaparral Resources, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
     2005 ("Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. All of the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
     of the Company.



Date: March 17, 2005                        /s/ Boris Zilbermints
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Boris Zilbermints
                                            Chief Executive Officer
USDA Agricultural Marketing Service 

Cotton Program July 22, 2009 

National Database Application 

Update for Existing Customers 

(PLEASE PRINT): 

 National Database User ID: _____________ 

 Name of Firm: _________________________________________________________ 

 Street Address: _________________________________________________________ 

 2nd Line Street Address: _________________________________________________________ 

 P. O. Box: _________________________________________________________ 

 City, State, Zip: _________________________________________________________ 

 Country: _________________________________________________________ 

 Telephone: (____) ____________ Fax: (____) ____________ 

 Taxpayer ID Number: _________________ (For U.S. customers only) 

 E-mail: ____________________________________________________________ 

 

If you plan to receive Form Rs, do you want to receive them via email? Yes or No _____ 

 (If you elect to receive the Form Rs via email, you will not receive a paper copy.) 

___________________________________ _________________________________ ________________ 

(Printed Name of Authorized Representative) (Signature of Authorized Representative) (Date) 

Please fax completed form to (901) 384-3035 for processing.