p. 1



# OAR Box 1793
Prepped byKeeiaRichards



### Document

Number: 

# 12) ll-F-5 4

Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/3/200811:31:54AM

Sheet 12 of 45P. 2



## Officeo f AirQualit ym*TM?*"* ****» 

# F 

# ^7^^c^r y

FA XNumber : (919 ) 541-530 9 

### A-90-37

rh^^^^-e^ (tu^

•^-"- ^ >t-tZ#i O



### If youdi d Numbe

rof Page s (includin gcove rsheet) :
;es ,pleas econtac ttht
91M41 .P. 3

1 0 th e provision s o f paragrap h(g ) o f thi s sectio n o r sectio n 52.21(g ) o f thi s chapter

. (39 ) Federa l officia l mean s th e Federa l officia l charge d wit hdirec t responsibilit yfo r managemen t o f an y land s withi n a Federa l Clas s I area . (40 ) Ai r qualit yrelate d valu e means , fo r purpose s o f thi s section , visibilit yo r a scenic , cultural , physical , biological , ecological , o r recreationa l resourc e tha t mayb e affected

. t>y.a # chang e inair # guality , a s define d by'th e Federal*Land'Manager"for"federal"land s an d a s define d b

ya Stat e o r India n Governin g Bod yfo r nonfedera l land s withi n thei r respectiv e jurisdictions

. (41 ) Advers e impac t o n ai r qualit yrelate d value s means , fo r purpose s o f thi s section , a deleteriou s effect , resultin g in-wheie-er-in-parf c fromemission s from a propose d majo r sourc e o r majo r modification , tha t interfere s wit hth e management , protection , preservation , o r enjoymen t o f th e ai r qualit yrelate d value s o f a Federa l Clas s I area . (42 ) Demonstrate d i n practic e mean s fo r th e purpose s o f thi s section , a contro l technologytha t ha s been — (i ) Liste d i no r require d b yan yo f th e following : (A ) Th e EPA' s RACT/BACT/LAE RClearinghouse ; (B ) Majo r sourc e constructio npermit s issue d pursuan t t o part s C an

d D o f titl e I o f th e Act ; (C ) Emission s limitation s containe d i nfederally

approve d plan s excludin g emission s limitation s establishe d b ypermit s issue d pursuan t t o program s fo r non-majo r sources ; (D ) Permit s an

d standard s unde r sectio n11 1 and 11 2 o f th e Act ; (E ) Th e EPA' s alternativ e Contro l TechnologyDocument s and Contro l Technique s Guidelines ; o r (ii ) No t withstandin g paragraph(b)(42)(i ) o f thi s section , installe d an d operating o n a nemission s uni t o r unit s whic hhav e operate d a t a minimu mo f 5 0 percen t o f nameplat e capacit yfo r 6 months , an d th e pollutio ncontro l efficienc yperformanc e ha s bee nverifie d wit ha performanc e
THI S DOCUMENT I S A PRELIMINAR

YDRAF T FO

ROFFIC E OF MANAGEMENT AN D BUDGE T REVIE

W AN DDOE S NO T REPRESENT OFFICIA L EP A POLICY ** * Octobe r 20 , 199 5 —[filenam e 51_166_6.29 ] ** *P. 4

1 3 accordin g t o paragrap h(j)(5 ) o f thi s sectio n o r applying fo r th e undemonstrate d technologyo r applicatio nwaive r unde r paragrap h(s ) o f thi s section

. (iv ) Informatio n an d dat a use d o r consulte d t o perform al l require d analyse s o r determination s unde r paragraph(o) , (P)

. (r) , (s ) an

d (u ) o f thi s section , a s applicable

.

**** * (3 ) Th e pla n shal l provid e tha t upo n reques t o f th e permittin g authority , th e owne r o r operato r shal l provid e an yinformatio n an

d dat a use d o r consulte d t o performal l require d analyse s o r determination s unde r paragraph(k) , (1 ) and (m ) o f thi s section

. (4 ) Th e pla n shal l provid e tha t a n applicatio nshal l no t b e considere d complet e unles s th e permi t applicatio nha s bee n registere d o n th e applicabl e EPAelectroni c bulleti n board

. T o register , a t a minimum , th e following mus t b e provided : (i ) Nam e an

d typ e o f source ; (ii ) Natur e o f propose d project , i.e. , ne wfacilit yo r modification ; (iii ) Propose d locatio n o f th e sSourc e ioeationi n state/count y*(including"universal"Transvers e Mercato r coordinates ) an

d th e distanc e betwee nth e sourc e and eac h Clas s I are a withi n25 0 kilometers ; (iv ) Anticipate d allowabl e emissions , o r increas e i n emissio n rate , fo r eac haffecte d ai r pollutan t regulate d unde r th e Act ; (v ) Sourc e contac t mailing addres s an d telephon e number ; an

d (vi ) Th e permitting agenc yresponsibl e fo r issuing th e permit

. (5 ) Th e pla n shal l provid e tha t prio r t o makin g a completenes s determination , th e permitting authorit yshal l provid e fo r an

yFedera l Lan

d Manage r revie wan d coordinatio n require d unde r paragraph(p)(5 ) o f thi s section

.

**** *
THI S DOCUMEN

T I S A PRELIMINAR

YDRAF T FO

ROFFIC E OF MANAGEMEN T AN D BUDGE T REVIE

W AN DDOE S NO T REPRESENT OFFICIA L EP A POLICY ** * Octobe r 20 , 199 5 — [filenam

e 51_166_6.29 ] ** *P. 5

1 4 (p)

- Source s potentiall yimpacting Federa l Clas s I area s (1 ) Protectio no f ai r qualit yrelate d values

. Th e Federa l Land Manage r an d th e Federa l Officia l hav e an affirmativ e responsibilit yt o protec t th e ai r qualit y relate d value s o f Federa l Clas s I area s an d t o consider , i n consultatio n wit hth e Administrator , whethe r a propose d sourc e o r modificatio n wil l hav e an advers e impac t o n suc h values

. (2 ) Genera l requirements , (i ) Notificatio no f potentia l impact s o n a Federa l Clas s I are a an d requiremen t fo r impac t assessment
. Th e pla nshal l provid e tha t wher e th e Federa l Official , Federa l Land Manager , th e Administrator , th e Governo r o f a nadjacen t State , o r th e governin g bodyo f a nadjacen t India n Trib e containin g a Federa l Clas s I area , files ( prio r to # the # dat e a completenes s determinatio n i s made'pursuant"to"paragraph (nj(1 ) o f this # section { a writte nnotic e alleging tha t emissions"from' a propose d major"sourc e o r majo r modificatio n maycaus e o r contribut e t o a chang e i nth e ai r qualit yi n suc hare a an

d identifying th e potentia l advers e impac t o f suc hchang e o n eac haffecte d ai r qualit yrelate d valu e

_,••••••••••••••••••••#•*••#••*•••••••••••••• • , identifiedi n th e § are a # by t th e # Federal ^ Land ^ Manager , a permi t shai i * not"b e * issued"unles s * the"owner"or'operator"o f suc h source : (A ) demonstrate s t o th e satisfactio n o f th e permittin g authorit ytha t emission s wil l no t caus e o r contribut e t o ambien t ai r qualit yconcentration s i nth e Federa l Clas s I are a whic hviolat e th e maximu mallowabl e increase s ove r baselin e concentrations , an d (B ) provide s a n analysi s o f th e potentia l impact s o nai r qualit yrelate d value s a t th e Federa l Clas s I area . Th e pla nmayprovid e tha t a permi t otherwis e prohibite d unde r thi s claus e mayb e issue d i n accordanc e wit hth e varianc e provision s i n paragrap h(p)(8 ) through(p)(ll ) o f thi s section

. (ii ) Availabl e informatio no nai r qualit yrelate d value s an

d analytica l methods

. Th e Federa l Land Manage r o r Federa l Officia l shal l provid e t o th e owne r o r operato r o f a propose d majo r sourc e o r majo r modificatio ntha t mayhav e a n advers e impac t o n ai r qualit yrelate d value s i na Federa l Clas s I are a al l availabl e informatio nabou t suc hvalue s an d method s t o analyz e potentia l impacts

. (iii ) Consultatio n wit hFedera l Land Manager
. Th e pla n shal l provid e fo r consultatio n an d coordinatio nwit h

THI S DOCUMEN

T I S A PRELIMINAR

YDRAF T FO

ROFFIC E OF MANAGEMEN T AN D BUDGE T REVIE

W AN DDOE S NO T REPRESENT OFFICIA L EP A POLICY ** * Octobe r 20 , 199 5 — [filename 51_166_6.29 ] ** *P. 6

1 6 (iv ) Consul t wit hth e Federa l Land Manage r abou t an y inconsistenc ybetwee n th e determinatio n b yth e permitting authorit yan

d th e Federa l Land Manager' s recommendations

. (6 ) Preliminaryan d fina l permi t determination—N o Clas s I incremen t violation

. Th e pla nshal l provid e that , wher e th e permittin g authorit yha s determine d tha t th e emission s fromth e propose d majo r sourc e o r majo r modificatio n wil l no t caus e o r contribut e t o ambien t ai r qualit yconcentration s i nth e Federa l Clas s I are a whic h excee d th e maximu

mallowabl e increase s ove r baselin e concentrations — (i ) Th e permitting authorit yshal l no t issue. a prelimarypermit [

determinatio n * untii] ¥ the'Federal"Land Manager"wili-b e has[been"given"at"ieas t 6 0 day s (fro m th e dat e o f issuance"of"the"completenes s determinatio nrequire d unde r paragrap h(n)(l ) o f "thi s "section thate-the-permit-i a eemptefee ) prie_?-fee-fche-permifeteing-att'fehe_rifey x 9-preli._.i_'-ar

y permi'fe-detei.aiina'feie n t o submi t a demonstrateio n tha t a propose d majo r sourc e or"major'modificatio n wil l hav e a n advers e impac t o n ai r qualit yrelate d values

. (ii ) I f th e permitting authorit yagree s wit hth e Federa l Land Manager' s demonstratio n unde r paragrap h (p)(6)(i ) o f thi s section , th e permitting authorit yshal l propos e t o den

yth e permit

. (iii ) I f th e permitting authorit ydisagree s i s no t satisfie d wit hth e Federa l Land Manager' s demonstration " under'paragrap h(p)(6)(i ) o f thi s section , th e permittin g authorit yshal l consul t wit hth e Federa l Land Manager , _re__e_renee-the-Pede_rai-_band-Mana§er x3-demenst_rafe__on-o_

. adve_rse-impaet-eB-a±_r-q«a_r__ty-_reia'feed-vaittes-in- , fehe-pubii e ne*teiee-anneunein§-the-pretiminary-pe_.*mi-fe-de , fcer_nina-feie n _reqaired-ttnder-parag?aph-fq-)-f4->f±ii->-o*--fehis-seefcien7-an d explai n an

d propos e t o approv e th e permi t wit ha n explanatio n i n writin g (fo r inclusio n i n th e publi c record ) reqHt_red-ttnder-paragraph-fq->f4tfii-)-o*- , ehis-see-feio n th e reason s fo r proposin g t o rejec t th e Federa l Land Manager' s demonstration

. Th e permitting authority's"writte n u^J-"'''^evaluatio n shal l eentain address , a t a minimum , th e * ^ following :

(A ) Th e basi s fo r an ydisagreemen t wit hth e dat a an d analyse s containe d i n th e Federa l Land Manager' s demonstratio n o f advers e impac t o nai r qualit yrelate d values ; THI S DOCUMENT I S APRELIMINARYDRAF T FO ROFFIC E O F MANAGEMENT AND BUDGE T REVIE WAN D DOE S NO T REPRESENT OFFICIAL EP APOLIC Y ** * Octobe r 20 , 199 5 —[filename 51_166_6.29 ] ** * . 0 ^P. 7



### 1 7 (B ) Anyconclusion s th e permitting authorit yreaches ( abou t whethe r th e adverae-impae-f e potentia l effect s o f th e proposed"sourc e wil l hav e an adverse"impact'on'air"qualit y relate d values , tha t ar e inconsisten t wit hthes e th e conclusion s # reached.b y# th e # Federal # Land Manage r i n * it s adverse [ impact [

demonstratedion-by-'fehe-Federai-Ban d ; an d (C ) Anymeasure s undertake n t o mitigat e th e potentia l advers e impact s o f propose d emission s increases , including th e estimate d effec t o f an ymitigation

. (iv ) I n th e fina l permi t determination , th e permitting authorit yshal l addres s an ycomment s mad e b

yth e Federa l Land Manage r concernin g th e permittin g authority' s preliminarydetermination

. (7 ) Mitigatio no f advers e impacts

. Th e pla nshal l provid e tha t a propose d majo r sourc e o r majo r modificatio n maymitigat e it s potentia l advers e impacts , i f any , o nai r qualit yrelate d value s i na Federa l Clas s I area . Th e permittin g authorit ymayissu e a permi t fo r a propose d majo r sourc e o r majo r modificatio n tha t woul d otherwis e b e denie d a permi t unde r paragraph(p)(6 ) o f thi s section , i f th e permittin g authorit ydetermines , i nconsultatio n wit hth e Federa l Land Manager , tha t th e sourc e ha s mitigate d it s advers e impac t o nai r qualit yrelate d values

. Th e owne r o r operato r o f a propose d majo r sourc e o r majo r modificatio n maymitigat e a n advers e impac t b yobtaining enforceabl e an d permanen t emission s reduction s o f sufficien t amoun t and i n suc hlocatio n tha t th e reduction s wil l offse t th e chang e i n ai r qualit yi n th e Federa l Clas s I are a tha t woul d hav e resulte d fromth e propose d source .

**** * (q ) * * * (2 ) Th e pla nmayse t fort hth e minimu minformatio n whic hmus t b e submitte d b ypubli c commenter s t o accompan y an yrecommendation s fo r contro l technologyalternative s fo r whic hpermi t applicant s woul d no t otherwis e b e responsibl e t o conside r i n determining bes t availabl e contro l technology a s o f th e dat e a napplicatio n i s complet e according t o paragrap h(j)(5)(iii ) o f thi s section

. Suc hinformatio nmay includ e th e nam e an d locatio no f th e sourc e utilizin g th e contro l technology , manufacture r an d typ e o f contro l device ,

THI S DOCUMENT I S APRELIMINARYDRAF T FOROFFIC E O F MANAGEMENT AND BUDGE T REVIE WAN D DOE S NO T REPRESENT OFFICIAL EP APOLIC Y ** * Octobe r 20 , 199 5 —[filename 51_166_6.29 ] ** *