alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00157

- CR

N ANCY L. N IELSEN

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

County Criminal Court No. 5

of Tarrant County (1 468780)

April 9, 2020

Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court i s affirme d.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
# C_2016202EN.01012601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/126 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/126

---

Article 173

(ex Article 157 TEC)

(ex Article 157 TEC)

1.   The Union and the Member States shall ensure that the conditions necessary for the competitiveness of the Union's industry exist.

For that purpose, in accordance with a system of open and competitive markets, their action shall be aimed at:

| — | speeding up the adjustment of industry to structural changes, |
| --- | --- |

—

speeding up the adjustment of industry to structural changes,

| — | encouraging an environment favourable to initiative and to the development of undertakings throughout the Union, particularly small and medium-sized undertakings, |
| --- | --- |

—

encouraging an environment favourable to initiative and to the development of undertakings throughout the Union, particularly small and medium-sized undertakings,

| — | encouraging an environment favourable to cooperation between undertakings, |
| --- | --- |

—

encouraging an environment favourable to cooperation between undertakings,

| — | fostering better exploitation of the industrial potential of policies of innovation, research and technological development. |
| --- | --- |

—

fostering better exploitation of the industrial potential of policies of innovation, research and technological development.

2.   The Member States shall consult each other in liaison with the Commission and, where necessary, shall coordinate their action. The Commission may take any useful initiative to promote such coordination, in particular initiatives aiming at the establishment of guidelines and indicators, the organisation of exchange of best practice, and the preparation of the necessary elements for periodic monitoring and evaluation. The European Parliament shall be kept fully informed.

3.   The Union shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives set out in paragraph 1 through the policies and activities it pursues under other provisions of the Treaties. The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, may decide on specific measures in support of action taken in the Member States to achieve the objectives set out in paragraph 1, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.

This Title shall not provide a basis for the introduction by the Union of any measure which could lead to a distortion of competition or contains tax provisions or provisions relating to the rights and interests of employed persons.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22-0299

JAIMI L. ESPY,

 Plaintiff and Appellant, 

 vs.

BRIAN A. LAGRECA, MD,

 Defendant and Appellee.

Pursuant to MRAP 26(1), counsel for Plaintiff-Appellant Jaimi L. Espy is given an 

extension of time until September 12, 2022, in which to prepare, file, and serve PlaintiffAppellant Jaimi L. Espy’s opening brief in this matter.

Dated this ___ of August, 2022.

For the Court,

By_________________________

ORDER

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 10 2022

08/10/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0299
p.1 

OAR Box 1394 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

15) ll-B-10 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/3/2008 7:22:10 AM Sheet 15 of 57 
P.2 

A-94-52 

II-B-10 

Docket No. A-94-52 

Category II-B 

The following information is located in the confidential files ofthe Director, Emission 

Standards Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. This information is 

confidential pending final determination by the Administrator and is not available for public 

inspection. 

CN-N404-9 

96185-C18-05 

K. Meardon, PES, to Project File. Site visit report for 7/11/96 visit to Sequentia, Inc. in Grand 

Junction, TN. 10/1/96. 10 pp.
THIS REPORT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION -for Internal Use Only-



# An Affordability Analysis of The Amalgamated Sugar Company LLC's Affordability Claim with respect to the Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) for the Riley Boiler at the Nampa, Idaho facility

February 12, 2010

prepared by: Elliot Rosenberg
Senior Economist U.S. EPA -Region 10

assisted by: Lloyd Oatis (SEE) Financial Analyst U.S. EPA -Region 10

Steve Body Senior Planning Engineer 

### U.S. EPA- Region 10THIS REPORT CONTAINS INFORMATION CLAIMED AS

CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION AND IS

NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Medical Security
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John R. Lombardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ James E. Prochnow

Vice President and Corporate Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)

May 13, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20209 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JORGE RAMIREZ-VILLA, also known as Jorge Luis Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-357-ALL

-------------------- December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jorge Ramirez-Villa appeals his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1) and (b)(2). He argues that his prior felony conviction is an element of the offense which should have been alleged in the indictment. Ramirez-Villa acknowledges that this argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but states that he is raising this issue to preserve it for possible Supreme Court review in view of the decision in Apprendi v. NewNo. 01-20209 -2- Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; see also United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Ramirez-Villa also argues that the indictment was defective in that it did not allege that he had any general intent to reenter the United States. Ramirez-Villa’s argument is foreclosed by United States v. Berrios-Centeno , 250 F.3d 294, 298 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 288 (2001), in which this court concluded that an indictment charging the defendant with being “previously deported and removed” from the United States and subsequently “found present in the United States . . . without having obtained the consent of the Attorney General . . . to apply for readmission into the United States” sufficiently alleged the general intent element of § 1326. Id. at 298-300 and n.4. Because the language of Ramirez-Villa’s indictment is identical to that in Berrios-Centeno , the indictment sufficiently alleged the general intent element of the offense. See id. at 298-300. AFFIRMED.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART FIVE

THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

TITLE III

COOPERATION WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AND HUMANITARIAN AID

COOPERATION WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AND HUMANITARIAN AID

CHAPTER 1

DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION

Article 210

(ex Article 180 TEC)

(ex Article 180 TEC)

1.   In order to promote the complementarity and efficiency of their action, the Union and the Member States shall coordinate their policies on development cooperation and shall consult each other on their aid programmes, including in international organisations and during international conferences. They may undertake joint action. Member States shall contribute if necessary to the implementation of Union aid programmes.

2.   The Commission may take any useful initiative to promote the coordination referred to in paragraph 1.

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00115-CV

Julie Chau

v.

Prime Healthcare Services D/B/A Harlingen Medical Center

On Appeal from the

445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2012-DCL-921-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 16, 2015
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A1 82 7 . RANDALL HARRI S v . THE STATE.

Ran d al l Ha r r i s was co n v i ct ed o f ag g rav at ed s ex u al b at t ery an d ch i ld

m o les t at i o n , an d we affi rm ed h i s co n v i ct i o n o n d i rect ap p eal i n an u n p u b l i s h ed

d eci s i o n

. See Cas e No

. A 1 3A1 2 2 4 (No v

. 2 2

, 2 0 1 3 )

. In 2 0 1 5

, Harri s fi l ed an

“ ex t rao rd i n ary ” m o t i o n fo r an o u t -o f

- t im e ap p eal

, wh i ch t h e t ri al co u rt d en i ed o n Sep tem b er 1 6 , 2 0 1 6. Harri s fi l ed a n o t i ce of ap peal o n N o v em b er 7

, 2 0 1 6

. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Pret erm it t i n g wh et h er th e d en i al o f Harri s ’ s m o t i o n fo r an o ut -o f-t i m e ap p eal

i s s u b j ect t o a di rect ap peal

, s ee Br o wn v. S t at e , 2 9 6 Ga. A p p

. 2 2 4

, 2 2 4 (6 74 SE2 d 9 1 ) (2 0 0 9) (“ [s ] i n ce an o u t -o f-t im e ap p eal i s n ot av ai l ab l e t o o n e wh o s e co n v i ct i o n h as
b een affi rm ed o n d i rect ap p eal

, t h e d en i al o f a m o t i o n fo r o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal

. . . i s n ot

s u b ject t o d i rect ap p eal ” an d an y s u ch ap p e al m u s t b e d i s m i s s ed ), t h i s ap p eal i s

u n t i m el y

. A n o t i ce o f ap p eal m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f th e en t r y o f an

ap p eal ab l e ju d gm en t

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro per an d t im el y fi l i n g o f a n o t i ce o f

ap p eal i s an ab s o l u te req u i rem en t t o c o n f er ap p el l at e ju ri sd i ct i o n o n t h is Co u rt

. Ro wl a n d v. S t at e , 2 6 4 Ga. 87 2

, 8 7 2 ( 1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6 ) (1 9 9 5 ). Harri s’ s no t i ce o f May 14, 2020ap p eal w as un t i m e l y fi l ed 52 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e o rd er s o u g h t t o b e ap p eal ed

.

Co n s eq u en t l y , we l ack ju ri sd i ct i o n o v er t h i s ap p eal

, wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia
C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 05/14/2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31,  2000,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                           JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                         1,091
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  7,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     941
<INVENTORY>                                                      878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               9,304
<PP&E>                                                        12,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 2,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                19,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          6,152
<BONDS>                                                        3,065
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                       3,802
<OTHER-SE>                                                     2,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  19,952
<SALES>                                                        9,965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               9,989
<CGS>                                                          7,938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  9,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  145
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      33
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              111
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     111
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.04


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1



|FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |  | CONTACT: |  | Nolan Lehmann 
|--------------------- |  | -------- |  | --------------
|                      |  |          |  | (713) 529-0900



EQUUS II
INCORPORATED ANNOUNCES

AGREEMENT TO SELL PORTFOLIO COMPANY



HOUSTON, TX  November 5, 2003Equus II Incorporated (NYSE: EQS) today announced that it has entered into a contract,
subject to certain conditions, to sell its entire investment interest in Strategic Holdings, Inc., a portfolio company. The proceeds of such sale to Equus are expected to approximate the value assigned to this investment in its last quarterly
report, which was over $16 million. The expected net proceeds will enable the Fund to pay in full its line of credit, which has approximately $10 million outstanding. The contract is subject to the buyer obtaining satisfactory financing to complete
the transaction, and is expected to close before year-end.



Sam P. Douglass,
Chairman and CEO commented, We are pleased that we have been able to negotiate a contract which, if consummated, will enable us to repay the Funds indebtedness in full and give us additional capital to explore new investment
opportunities. We are proud of the effort put forth by the management team at Strategic Holdings over the last several years, which resulted in an increase in the recorded value of this investment from $10.2 million at December 31, 2001 to over $16
million currently. Their efforts have enabled us to achieve liquidity and a reasonable valuation for this investment, and we wish them well in their continuing roles with the acquiring entity.



Equus II is a business development company and seeks to generate current distributions of net
investment income and long-term capital gains by making equity-oriented investments in small to medium-sized privately owned companies. The current portfolio consists of investments in 18 businesses in various industries and two venture capital
funds. Information on Equus II Incorporated and other Equus entities may be obtained on the Internet at www.equuscap.com.



Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This press release contains statements relating to future results of the
Company (including certain projections and business trends) that are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those projected as a result of
certain risks and uncertainties, including those which are more fully set forth in the Funds Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.



# # #
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (DMR)—Materials Innovation Platform on BioPolymers, Automated Cellular Infrastructure, Flow, and Integrated Chemistry (BioPACIFIC MIP) Site Visit Review (#1203).                

*Date and Time:*                     January 22, 2024; 7:50 a.m.-6:00 p.m. January 23, 2024; 8:00 a.m.-3:30 p.m.                

*Place:*                     California Institutes for Sciences and Innovation, University of California, 1601 Elings Hall, Mesa Road, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Part open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Z. Charles Ying, Program Director, Division of Materials Research, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone (703) 292-8428.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     Site visit to provide advice and recommendations concerning further support of the BioPACIFIC MIP at University of California.                

## Agenda

### Monday, January 22, 2024

7:50 a.m.-8:20 a.m. Executive Session (Closed)

8:20 a.m.-11:30 a.m. Review of BioPACIFIC MIP (Open)

11:30 a.m.-1:30 p.m. Executive Session (Closed)

1:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m. Review of BioPACIFIC MIP (Open)

3:30 p.m.-6:00 p.m. Executive Session (Closed)

### Tuesday, January 23, 2024

8:00 a.m.-3:30 p.m. Executive Session (Closed)

*Reason for Closing:*                     Topics to be discussed and evaluated during closed portions of the site review will include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; and information on personnel. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                

Dated: November 21, 2023.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-26063 Filed 11-24-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P