alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6169

ROBIN VIRGINIA MEADOW COLLINS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

PAT GREEN; ELLIOTT PANNELL; H. M. EDWARDS; JANELLE THORNE; 

SERGEANT PERRY; SERGEANT WHITLEY; SGT. JOHNSON; 

SGT. WILSON; OFFICER KEMP; NURSE MARIA; LOIS VERZALL, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (5:14-ct-03109-F) 

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Robin Virginia Meadow Collins, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Robin Virginia Meadow Collins seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing without prejudice her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) civil action. Collins’ complaint was dismissed for 

failure to comply with the district court’s order directing that 

she particularize her claims and provide information relative to 

the exhaustion of her administrative remedies. This court may 

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 

28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). 

The order Collins seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor 

an appealable interlocutory or collateral order because it is 

possible for her to cure the deficiencies identified by the 

district court by filing an amended complaint. See Domino Sugar 

Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066–67 

(4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
#### Bennie WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 2728.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

July 14, 1976.

David C. Backstrom, Deputy Public Defender, Fairbanks, for appellant.

Peter Michalski, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Harry L. Davis, Dist. Atty., Fairbanks, Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J. and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, ERWIN and BURKE, JJ.

*661OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is a sentence appeal.

Bennie Washington was convicted of attempted robbery. He was sentenced to five years of imprisonment.

We have reviewed the record in light of *State v. Chaney, A77*P.2d 441 (Alaska 1970); *Donlun v. State,*527 P.2d 472, 475 (Alaska 1974); *Cleary v. State,*548 P.2d 952 (Alaska 1976) and *Bradley v. State,*535 P.2d 1031, 1033-34 (Alaska 1975).

We note that Washington was convicted in Wisconsin in 1970 for armed robbery and for carrying a concealed weapon. He was 31 years old at the time of his sentencing in Alaska. Although Washington labored under certain disadvantages in his early life these are offset by a number of advantages afforded him in his adult life, and in any event do not mitigate his resort to criminal activities.

From our review of the record we cannot say that the sentencing judge was clearly mistaken.

AFFIRMED.
----

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects      the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the      Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this    report; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Roy W. Olivier                        |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Roy      W. Olivier                       |
|   | President      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

----
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sun Network Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, T.
Joseph Coleman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



May 13, 2005                      By:   /s/ T. Joseph Coleman
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                        T. Joseph Coleman
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                           Financial Officer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply491Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  RODNEY PRUIT (not verified)PermalinkJune 26, 2022 - 10:48amIt's very impressive to see that the people in the Washington DC Capital have absolute great pride in preserving these beautiful early handcrafted clocks in the Capital building.
The Voigt clock with the Federal look featuring an eagle above the face of the dial is quite impressive. At this very moment, I do not know how many of these exist, but at least one is pictured in the hall near the Senate.
I'm a reverse painter for old and new clocks, and after seeing this clock, I just had to step in to comment on my thoughts. I would love to see this clock in real-time, only if I can afford to travel. Thank you for sharing this beautiful piece of history for many, many generations to come. Very impressive and I too love early clocks just like you fine people.
Respectfully yours, the citizens of the United States,
RODNEY PRUITT
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying QuarterlyReport of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 (the “Report”),I, L’Sheryl D. Hudson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report dated February 6, 1997 in this Form 10-K into Dole Food Company,
Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 Registration Nos.
33-41480 and 33-64984 and Form S-8 Registration Nos. 2-87475, 33-594, 33-28782,
33-60643, 33-60641, 33-42152, 333-13739 and 333-06949.
 
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 28, 1997
### I' 1.s ; u 1.11 11 vo" 

### =: **~** 1 

# ~AI'PI



# ~ffRf

< ..... 

# J \ KUBBS CHICAGO CLA SS I 

# 100 40
# C ou r t

of A p p e al s of t h e S t at e of

G e or gi a

A

T L A N T A

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s h e r e b y p a s s e s t h e f o l l o w i n g o r d e r :

A 1 9 E 0 0 1 6

. D A K

E R v

. O W E N S e t a l

.

W a s e e m D a

k e r h a s m o v e d f

o r a n e x t e n s i o n o f t i m e t o f i l e h i s a p p l i c a t i o n s f o r

d i s c r e t i o n a r y a p p e a l f r o m t h e t r i a l c o u r t ’ s o r d e r d i s m i s s i

n g C a s e N o s

. 2 0 1 6

- C V

2 8 2 1 9 0

, 2 0 1 7

- C V

- 2 8 7 0 0 3

, a

n d 2 0 1 7

- C V

- 2 8 9 0 0 4

. 1 D a

k e r ’ s r e q u e s t f o r a n e x t e n s i o n

o f t i m e i s h e r e b y G

R A N T E D

. S e e G

a b l e v

. S t a t e , 2 9 0 G a

. 8 1

, 8 4 ( 2 ) ( a ) ( 7 2 0 S E 2 d

1 7 0 ) ( 2 0 1 1 ) ( e x

t e n s i o n s o f t i m e t o f i l e d i s c r e t i o n a r y a p p l i c a t i o n s m a y b e g r a n t e d

p u r s u a n t t o O C G A § 5

- 6

- 3 9 ( a ) ( 5 ) )

. D a

k e r s h a l l h a v e t h i r t y ( 3 0 ) d a y s f r o m t h e d a t e

o f t h i s o r d e r t o f

i l e h i s a p p l i c a t i o n s f o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y a p p e a l

.

C o u r t o f Ap p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

C l e r k ’s O f f i c e

, At l a n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t

r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f Ap p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t

h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w

r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 D a k e r ’ s m o t i o n l i s t s t h e f i n a l c a s e a s 2 0 1 7

- C V

- 2 8 9 4 0 4

, r a

t h e r t h a n 2 0 1 7

- C V

2 8 9 0 0 4

. October 30, 2018

10/30/2018
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply563Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Toni  Siegel (... (not verified)PermalinkMay 16, 2017 - 11:07pma wonderful rest from politics!  Make way for Ducklings!!!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
/HEAD>

Exhibit 99.4

| | KPMGLLP                    |                         
| | -------------------------- | ------------------------
| | Chartered Accountants      |                         
| | 2000 McGill College Avenue | Telephone (514) 840-2100
| | Suite 1900                 | Telefax (514) 840-2187  
| | Montréal (Québec) H3A 3H8  | www.kpmg.ca             



The Board of DirectorsCanadian
National Railway Company

We consent to the use of our audit reports, both dated January 27, 2004, on the consolidatedbalance sheet of the Canadian National Railway Company (the
Company) as at December 31, 2003 and the consolidated statement of income, comprehensive income, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
principles and on the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as at December 31, 2003 and the consolidated statement of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended prepared in accordance with Canadian generally
accepted accounting principles, incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F.



Chartered Accountants

Montreal, Canada
May 3, 2004



| | KPMGLLP,
            a Canadian limited liability partnership is the Canadianmember
    firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

OCTOBER 16, 2003 Session

ANTOINE LAMARR v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, ET AL.

Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County

No. CH-01-1967-2 Floyd Peete, Jr., Chancellor

No. W2002-02087-COA-R3-CV - Filed February 27, 2004

SEPARATE CONCURRENCE

________________________

 

I agree with the result reached by the majority in this case, but I write separately because I

disagree somewhat with the reasoning used by the majority. Although I agree that there was

substantial and material evidence upon which the Memphis Civil Service Commission could

determine that the new zero tolerance policy was properly communicated to police officers such as

Antoine LaMarr, I think this is a peripheral issue.

LaMarr was not terminated for violating the new zero tolerance policy. LaMarr was found

to have violated D.R. 104, thePolice Department’s rule prohibiting conduct which reflects adversely

on the Department or its members. From the Commission’s review of the proof, there was ample

evidence from which to conclude that LaMarr had violated this policy. He was involved in a one-car

accident in the middle ofthe night. Although he admitted to having consumed alcohol and spending

the evening at a nightclub and his voice was slurry at the scene, he refused a blood-alcohol test.

LaMarr contended that he consumed no alcohol in his 3 1/2 hours at the club because he was sick,

and at the same time maintained that he spent most of his time at the club dancing. LaMarr told the

Commission that his car was forced off the road by an eighteen-wheeler truck, but had said nothing

about this to the officer at the scene. The Commission concluded that the testimony LaMarr gave

was “neither credible nor logical.” Clearly there was plenty of evidence to support the conclusion

that LaMarr violated D.R. 104, and that termination was warranted.

LaMarr’s defense regarding the new zero tolerance policy appears to be that no one had told

him that D.R. 104 would really be enforced. This is smokescreen. The real issue is whether there

was sufficient evidence to support the Commission’s conclusion that LaMarr violated D.R. 104, the

Department’s longstanding rule prohibiting conduct which would reflect adversely on the 
Department. Clearly there was more than enough evidence to support this conclusion, and I would

uphold the termination on this basis.

For these reasons, I concur separately. 

________________________________________

HOLLY M. KIRBY, J.
ClouIH-' O^ CXlHvWL A/VcsblW £>^ 7^/*ir

?-0.' fe^ U308 CrrfftoL -S-ftr^/l.

Gotten CAiaW tp&&>

X uWl Latk h ^sc ^/i. f*/Y ^ 7A*>

ukk. Ca«U. TW ix»*r S^VV X?> /he. SW <x£o.

Of ^L CfiuLr-H^ /Wea(^» de<&k>Aa (^ W //.C//6 7.

"3 rib P^&V t/tfOuJ ?P Z Us^P £>»te_ kiuiir rbr£ o/Z_

"^v ( X /io Ab+ isW> nU 1\*>1 c*&H uUh Cod.*-.))

Tta Qui* AWbenr. Uv^ Sim 5£5d8>v/ S836T7.'

ISPs f/n .766

77f5# Y -/^ AT

CQUBTOFCBIMINALAPPBLS

APR 20 2015

Ab©SAC0S!t,Gierk

3
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Juan R. Vasquez, Defendant.

Court of General Sessions of County of New York,

December 16, 1958.

*Juan B. Vasquez,*defendant in person.

*Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney,*for plaintiff.

George M. Carney, J.

This is a motion for resentence erroneously entitled as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus contesting a sentence imposed on one Juan R. Vasquez. On December 20, 1957 the petitioner was convicted of the crime of assault in the third degree and on February 5, 1958 was sentenced to the New York County Penitentiary for an indeterminate term. Under the pertinent statutes the petitioner could have been confined in a penal institution for not more than one year (Penal Law, §§ 600, 1937) or in a reformatory-type institution for an indeterminate term not exceeding three years (Correction Law, § 203). The reformatory-type sentence is forbidden by law only for any convicted person who was *‘1*mentally or physically incapable of being substantially benefited ” by reformatory treatment (Correction Law, § 203, subd. [e], par. 3). After hearing the petitioner at the time he entered his plea of guilty and after a reading of a complete probation report including a psychiatric examination, I chose *375to sentence him to a reformatory-type sentence finding him to be a person not incapable of such benefit.

A writ of habeas corpus is not available to attack the sentence since this court had jurisdiction of his person and of the crime with which he was charged and the power to declare the particular sentence meted out to him *(Matter of Hogan*v. *Supreme Court of New York,*295 N. Y. 92, 97). It is only when the “petitioners” sentence is for a term longer than authorized by statute *(People ex rel. Carollo*v. *Brophy,*294 N. Y. 540, 542) that habeas corpus may be invoked to correct it *(People ex rel. Tweed*v. *Liscomb,*60 N. Y. 559, 591, 592; *People ex rel. Milton*v. *Jackson,*297 N. Y. 708). The matter of sentencing appeared on the face of the record. It does not appear that the petitioner has appealed from his conviction in this case. No reason is shown why he should have this additional remedy besides appeal which he failed to use. Since habeas corpus is the wrong remedy, the question of the propriety of the sentence cannot be considered *(People ex rel. Kern*v. *Silberglitt,*4 N Y 2d 59).

The motion is in all respects denied.

The District Attorney is directed to enter an order in conformance with the decision herein rendered and to forward a copy of said order to the defendant.
162 P.3d 17

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

July 13, 2007

27745

#### Motion to Quash an Administrative Subpoena Between Office of Hawaii County Prosecuting Attorney and Wagner, In re

Affirmed
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the annual report of Cascade Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Robert C. Warren, Jr.
|Robert C. Warren, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer  
|April 6, 2009            
|                         
|/s/ Joseph G. Pointer    
|Joseph G. Pointer        
|Chief Financial Officer  
|April 6, 2009
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply11783Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Kellen Wenzing (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 24, 2022 - 12:57pmThanks for sharing your experiences.
 Remember that you are strong because you've been weak.
You are fearless because you've been afraid.
You are wise because you've been foolish.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe