alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VII

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

CHAPTER 1

RULES ON COMPETITION

SECTION 1

SECTION 1

RULES APPLYING TO UNDERTAKINGS

Article 102

(ex Article 82 TEC)

(ex Article 82 TEC)

Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the internal market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the internal market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States.

Such abuse may, in particular, consist in:

| (a) | directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions;

| (b) | limiting production, markets or technical development to the prejudice of consumers; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

limiting production, markets or technical development to the prejudice of consumers;

| (c) | applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage;

| (d) | making the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

making the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.

---
EXHIBIT 13.1
  CERTIFICATION
    OF
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
    TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
    ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 20-F
        /s/  Michael
    Smith
       This certification accompanies this Annual Report pursuant to
    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
    not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed
    by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
    Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
    reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
    amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
    Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
**Exhibit 32.1**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of infoUSA Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.   Date: November 13, 2003 */s/ Vinod Gupta*
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 15, 2015

No. 04-14-00772-CR

Jonathan Jose GUILLEN,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2647

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

ORDER

We grant the court reporter’s motion for extension of time to file the record. We order

Debra Doolittle to file the record by April 27, 2015. No further extensions of time will be 

granted. If Doolittle is unable to perform all her duties and complete the record in a timely 

manner, she must take whatever steps are necessary, including requesting a substitute reporter or 

hiring competent assistance, to file the record by the date ordered.

If the record is not filed by the date ordered, we may order the reporter to appear and 

show cause why she should not be held in contempt. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Cybrdi, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2007

         3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date:  March 30, 2008

                                   By: /s/ Xue Bu
                                       ----------
                                       Xue Bu
                                       Treasurer and COO
1

Document Submitted to Initiate E.O. 12866 Review 

Risk Management Program Request for Information (RFI) 

List of Acronyms and Abbreviations in Federal Register Notice - Accidental Release Prevention 

Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r)(7) 

May 29, 2014 

USEPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Emergency Management 

AEGL Acute Exposure Guideline Level 

AIHA American Industrial Hygiene Association 

ALARP As Low as Reasonably Practicable 

AN Ammonium Nitrate 

ANFO Ammonium Nitrate/Fuel Oil 

API American Petroleum Institute 

ATF Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives 

BSEE Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement 

CAA Clean Air Act 

CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 

CAS Chemical Abstract Service 

CASRN Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number 

CBI Confidential Business Information 

CCPS Center for Chemical Process Safety 

CDR Chemical Data Reporting 

CD-ROM Compact Disk- Read Only Memory 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

CSB U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board 
2

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

DOI U.S. Department of the Interior 

DOT Department of Transportation 

EHS Extremely Hazardous Substance 

EPA Environmental Protection Agency 

EPCRA Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act 

ERPG Emergency Response Planning Guidelines 

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency 

FR Federal Register 

FRP Facility Response Plan 

LEPC Local Emergency Planning Committee 

LOC Level of Concern 

IDLH Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health 

IME Institute of Makers of Explosives 

IST Inherently Safer Technology 

JSA Job Safety Analysis 

mm Hg Millimeters of Mercury 

MSHA Mine Safety and Health Administration 

NAC National Advisory Committee 

NAICS North American Industrial Classification System 

NFPA National Fire Protection Association 

NFPA 400 National Fire Protection Association Hazardous Materials Code 

NIOSH National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health 

NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

OCA Off-site Consequence Analysis 
3

OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration 

OSWER Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response 

PHA Process Hazard Analysis 

PREP National Preparedness for Response Exercise Program 

PSM Process Safety Management 

RAGAGEP Recognized and Generally Accepted Good Engineering Practices 

RFI Request for Information 

RHS Reactive Hazard Substance 

RMP Risk Management Program 

RTECS Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances 

RTR Research and Test Reactor 

SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 

SDS Safety Data Sheet 

SEMS II Safety and Environmental Management Systems 

SERC State Emergency Response Commission 

SIC Standard Industrial Classification 

TCPA Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act (New Jersey) 

TDI Toluene Diisocyanate 

TNT Trinitrotoluene 

TPQ Threshold Planning Quantity 

TQ Threshold Quantity 

USC United States Code 

USCG U.S. Coast Guard 

V Air Dispersion Factor
#### Martha Cohen, Plaintiff, *v.*Leon Cohen, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

May 15, 1959.

*.Harry Greenspan*for plaintiff.

*Mars & Burton*for defendant.

J. Irwin Shapiro, J.

This is a motion by the plaintiff for summary judgment in an action to recover installments of $15 per week accruing under a judgment in the Juvenile Court of Texas, in and for Dallas County. The judgment not only provided that ‘ ‘ the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between said plaintiff Martha Cohen and defendant Leon Cohen be and the same are hereby annulled and dissolved and that each party is hereby restored to the status of single persons ” but also contained a provision that *“*defendant pay into the registry of this Court the sum of $15.00 per week beginning 4-18-55 for the support of the minor child of plaintiff and defendant”.

At the time of the institution of the suit in Texas the *‘1*Defendant Leon Cohen resided, in the City of New York”; he was personally served with a ‘ *‘*nonresident citation in said cause * * * within the County of Queens, New York * * * ; that the Defendant in response to said citation did not appear or make answer * * *; that said service of citation was pursuant to Rule 108 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure which authorizes the service of nonresident notice or citation on a nonresident Defendant in the manner above described.”

Upon the assumption that plaintiff was a bona fide resident of Texas and that, therefore, the Juvenile Court of Texas had jurisdiction to operate on the marriage *res*and thereby dissolve the bonds of matrimony between the parties *(Williams*v. *North*Carolina, 317 U. S. 287), it nevertheless had no jurisdiction to render a judgment in personam against the defendant — a nonresident— served with process outside of its territorial jurisdiction and who did not appear in the action. *(Estin*v. *Estin,*296 *428N. Y. 308, affd. 334 U. S. 541; *Chapman*v. *Chapman,*284 App. Div. 504.)

The fact that a judgment thus rendered is jurisdictionally and constitutionally acceptable for one purpose and void and invalid for another may be an anomalous situation but is now well settled as being the law. *(Estin*v. *Estin,*supra; *Lansdale*v. *Lansdale,*1 A D 2d 374; *Reschofsky*v. *Reschofsky,*272 App. Div. 694; *Rigney*v. *Rigney,*127 N. Y. 408.)

It clearly appearing that the defendant at all times was a resident of the State of New York and that he did not appear in the Texas action, the plaintiff may not enforce a claim for a personal money judgment against him on the basis of the judgment in that action.

Where, on a motion for summary judgment, it clearly appears to the court that there is no triable issue of fact, the court may award the proper judgment, regardless of which side moved for judgment. (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113.)

Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied and plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed.

Submit order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>       5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       8,481,693
<SECURITIES>                                   288,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,321,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,090,975
<PP&E>                                      67,407,999
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,751,509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,747,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,043,875
<BONDS>                                     29,573,892
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,129,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,747,465
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,043,804
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,564,077
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,278,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                201,221
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            201,221
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   201,221
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
September 3, 2015

Mr. Joe Bulleit

1341 S late Run Road

New Albany, IN 47150

Dear Mr. Bulleit :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ § 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2),

91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can

not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your May 8, 2015

, exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 1844 , but

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to sen d your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions yo u may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
From: "EIN News" 

<noreply@noreply.einnews.com> 

 

 To: Ronald 

Jordan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

 Date: 02/02/2010 11:54 AM 

 

 Subject: US Nuclear Reactors Leaking Carcinogen into 

Groundwater 

 

EIN News 

More Than 25 pct of US Nuclear Reactors Leaking Carcinogen into 

Groundwater 

February 2, 2010 /EIN PRESSWIRE/ The Associated Press reports that at 

least 27 of the 104 nuclear reactors in the US have been leaking a 

cancer-causing by-product of nuclear fission, with the leaks mostly 

occurring through deteriorating underground pipes. 

The carcinogen tritium has been discovered in potentially dangerous 

levels (more than three times the federal safety standard) in the 

groundwater around the nuclear plants, most recently at the Vermont 

Yankee Nuclear plant. 

Tritium has been linked to cancer if ingested, inhaled or absorbed 

through the skin in large amounts, and the concentration of tritium 

found in groundwater has caught the attention of the Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

Follow this story at Nuclear Power News Today: 

Latest Tritium news – 

http://nuclearpower.einnews.com/news/radioactive-tritium

Latest Vermont Nuclear Power news - 

http://nuclearpower.einnews.com/vermont/

Located at http://nuclearpower.einnews.com, Nuclear Power News Today is 

a service of EIN News, an industry leader in news monitoring for 

business professionals and analysts. Using a combination of proprietary 

search technology and human editing, EIN News delivers to its members 

the latest nuclear power news from around the world, saving them 

valuable time they’d spend searching for information. New users to 

Nuclear Power News Today can enjoy a no-obligation, one-week free trial. 

About EIN Presswire 

The EIN Presswire press release distribution service is a 

news-syndication solution that distributes news to more than 10 million 

visitors annually at EIN News and millions more through its press 
release distribution partners. A news source for leading journalists, 

decision-makers and industry professionals worldwide, EIN Presswire 

targets press releases to a wide array of worldwide business 

professionals in more than 80 different industries. EIN Presswire also 

offers affiliate network opportunities and news distribution to tens of 

thousands of news subscribers daily. Read the newest business news at 

http://www.einpresswire.com and the latest world news in more than 80 

different industries at http://www.einnews.com.

This message has been sent to jordan.ronald@epa.gov by the IPD Group, 

Inc. 

If you would prefer not to receive further messages, please confirm your 

request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1165

SHELIA Y. CRUTHIRDS,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

KAREN MILLER, Division Chief Child Youth School Age 

Services/Directorate Family, Morale, Welfare and Recreation 

(CYSS/DFMWR); JOHN M. MCHUGH, Secretary, Department of the 

Army,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:13-cv-00849-BO)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shelia Y. Cruthirds, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shelia Y. Cruthirds appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Cruthirds v. Miller, No. 5:13-cv-00849-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

      We have issued our report dated February 5, 2004, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report of Camco Financial
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We hereby consent
to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements
of Camco Financial Corporation on Forms S-8, File No. 333-94113, effective
January 5, 2000 and File Nos. 333-90142, 333-90152, 333-90158 and 333-90166
effective June 10, 2002.


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio
March 11, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 229 (Thursday, November 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83565-83566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4673-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


Florida; Amendment No. 15 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Florida (FEMA-4673-DR), dated September 29, 2022, and related 
determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 25, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter 
dated October 25, 2023, the President amended the cost-sharing 
arrangements regarding Federal funds provided under the authority of 
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 
U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford Act''), in a letter to Deanne 
Criswell, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 
Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as 
follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State 
of Florida resulting from Hurricane Ian during the period of 
September 23 to November 4, 2022, is of sufficient severity and 
magnitude that special cost sharing arrangements are warranted 
regarding Federal funds provided under the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. 
(the ``Stafford Act'').
    Therefore, I amend my declarations of September 29, 2022, 
October 4, 2022, and November 28, 2022, to authorize Federal

[[Page 83566]]

funds for all categories of Public Assistance at 90 percent of total 
eligible costs, except assistance previously approved at 100 
percent.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-26272 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P