alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 862 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 862

 To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide that the first sale 
  doctrine applies to any computer program that enables a machine or 
                       other product to operate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2015

  Mr. Farenthold (for himself and Mr. Polis) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide that the first sale 
  doctrine applies to any computer program that enables a machine or 
                       other product to operate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``You Own Devices Act''.

SEC. 2. FIRST SALE DOCTRINE AND CERTAIN COMPUTER PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 109 of title 17, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Transfer of Certain Computer Programs.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding section 106 or section 
        117, if a computer program enables any part of a machine or 
        other product to operate, the owner of the machine or other 
        product is entitled to transfer an authorized copy of the 
        computer program, or the right to obtain such copy, when the 
        owner sells, leases, or otherwise transfers the machine or 
        other product to another person. The right to transfer provided 
        under this subsection may not be waived by any agreement.
            ``(2) Security and error correction.--Any right to receive 
        modifications to the computer program described in paragraph 
        (1) relating in whole or in part to security or error 
        correction that applied to the owner of the machine or other 
        product described in paragraph (1) shall apply to the person to 
        whom the machine or product and the copy of the computer 
        program are transferred.
            ``(3) Treatment of unauthorized copies.--Nothing in this 
        subsection should be construed as permitting the owner of a 
        machine or other product to retain an unauthorized copy of the 
        computer program described in paragraph (1) after transferring 
        the machine or other product and the copy of the computer 
        program to another person.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to 
transfers of computer programs occurring on or after such date.
                                 <all>
```
September 11, 1996

18862

#### GGS Co., Ltd. v. New York Diamond, Inc.

Order No. 96-6

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          53,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,300
<PP&E>                                         146,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 146,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 674,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          697,600
<BONDS>                                        236,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,400
<COMMON>                                        51,900
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,047,600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   674,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  184,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (30,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (30,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-27-1996
<CASH>                                          47,619
<SECURITIES>                                     7,006
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (27,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,588,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,882,182
<PP&E>                                       2,802,825
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,622,610)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,469,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,528,045
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     41,667
<COMMON>                                         1,498
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,115,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,469,379
<SALES>                                      2,330,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,330,458
<CGS>                                          668,321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  668,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,599,635
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 87,570
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             87,570
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    87,570
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .022
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .020
        

</TABLE>
Appellant may file an appeal after an appealable, written 

order or judgment is filed. Because we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, 

we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

J. 

Parraguirre 

J. 

cc: Chief Judge, The Fifth Judicial District Court 

Hon. David R. Gamble, Senior Judge 

Peter Jason Helfrich 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Nye County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A e
|Exhibit 23.1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Consent of Independent Public Accountants                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8 Registration Statements, File Numbers, 033-65256, 033-65254, 033-65890, 333-07735, 333-46791, 333-46795, 333-46797, and 333-46809 of our report dated July 11, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Butler National Corporation included in the Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2006.
/s/ Weaver & Martin, LLC
Kansas City, Missouri
July 27, 2006
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D23- 1836 LT Case No. 2023

- CA

- 626

_____________________________ F RAN C ISCO G ARC IA , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee
.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County. Michelle Morley, Judge. Fran c isco Garcia, Bushnell, pro se. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Talla hassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assista nt Attorney General, Daytona Beac h, for Appellee. September 19, 2023
P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . M AKAR , W ALLIS , and P RA TT , J J., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



The undersigned officers of AutoImmune Inc. (the Company) hereby certify that, as of the date of this statement, the Companys quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act) and that, to the
best of their knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of September 30, 2005 and the results of operations of the Company for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2005.



The purpose of this
certification is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This statement is not filed for the purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Act or any other federal or state law or regulation



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                         |  |                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/    ROBERT C.
BISHOP
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Name:                   |  | Robert C. Bishop                 
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Title:                  |  | Chief Executive Officer          
|                        |  |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                         |  | /s/    DIANE M.
MCCLINTOCK       
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Name:                   |  | Diane M. McClintock              
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Title:                  |  | Director of Finance and Treasurer
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
John Cabot Relief Sculpture

One of four wreathed panels featuring framed portrait busts of early explorers.
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Enrico Causici and Antonio Capellano

Materials
    Sandstone

Year
    1828

Location
      
Above the "Landing of Columbus" Painting

Capitol Rotunda

Above four of the large Rotunda paintings in the U.S. Capitol are decorative panels of wreaths and portraits of early explorers carved in relief into the sandstone walls. The three sculptors who decorated the Rotunda were employed during the rebuilding of the Capitol after the fire of 1814.

Between the decorative panels of wreaths and portraits, historic scenes, also in relief, circle the Rotunda walls. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Doric Columns

Doric columns typically have a simple, rounded capital at the top; a heavy, fluted or smooth column shaft; and no base.
        
                  The Basics
      
Location
      
Crypt
          Old Supreme Court Chamber
          Cannon House Office Building
          Russell Senate Office Building

Columns in this style can be found throughout Capitol Hill, including the U.S. Capitol, the Supreme Court Building, the Russell Senate Office Building and the Cannon House Office Building.

The Crypt in the U.S. Capitol Building contains 40 smooth Doric columns of sandstone, which support the arches holding up the floor of the Rotunda. Also in the Capitol, Doric columns can be found in the Old Supreme Court Chamber, designed by Benjamin Latrobe. These columns are modeled on the Temple of Poseidon, which were the shortest and the strongest columns that survive from classical Greece.

Preservation at the AOC: Historic ColumnsThe Supreme Court Building's main corridor is known as the Great Hall, a grand rectangular vestibule that is 30 feet high and lined on both sides with double rows of fluted Doric columns. The columns rise to a coffered ceiling.

The Cannon House Office Building and Russell Senate Office Building, which are nearly identical, contain 34 fluted Doric columns each along their colonnades, facing the United States Capitol. Pilasters continue the Doric order along secondary elevations. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Mae Churchman, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

May 11, 1959.

*Wood, Marshall & Williams*for Howard 0. Wood, as trustee, petitioner.

*White <& Case*for Bide-a-Wee Home Association, Inc., respondent.

*Alanson B. Fredericks*for American Surety Co., respondent.

*Gasser S Mayes*for Green-Wood Cemetery, respondent.

*Reynolds, Richards, Ely $ La Venture*for New York Women’s League for Animals, respondent.

*Thomas A. Rizzo,*as special guardian for Mary Doherty and others, infants, respondent.

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The final paragraph of the Ninth Article of the will of the testatrix explicitly provides that title to the legacies directed to be paid from the residuary trust shall vest only at the death of the beneficiary upon whose life the trust was measured. Were it not for this explicit direction the legacies payable from the trust remainder would have vested in the named legatees upon the death of the testatrix and now would be payable to their legal representatives *(Matter of Montgomery,*258 App. Div. 64, affd. 282 N. Y. 713; *Matter of Evans,*165 Misc. 752, affd. 258 App. Div. 1037, affd. 284 N. Y. 571; *Matter of Watson,*262 N. Y. 284; *Matter of Cole,*17 Misc 2d 352) and, for like reasons, the legacy bequeathed under paragraph K of the Ninth Article would be divisible in equal shares between the estate of the deceased legatee and the sur*932vivor of the two named legatees (cf. *Matter of Haaser,*187 Misc. 368; *Matter of Moore,*13 Misc 2d 640). However, in view of the contrary direction in the will, it is held that the estates of the legatees who predeceased the trust beneficiary acquired no beneficial interest under the will and these legacies are distributable as intestate property of the testatrix.

The fee of the attorney trustee is allowed in the total amount of $750. In so evaluating the services the court has taken into consideration the distinction which necessarily must be made between legal services and services rendered by the attorney in his fiduciary capacity for which he has been compensated by statutory commissions.

Submit decree on notice.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

          STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned officers of AutoImmune Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certify that, as of the date of this statement, the Company's quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company as of and
for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002.

         The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of
the Sabarnes-Oxley Act of 2002. This statement is not "filed" for the purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that Act or any other federal or state law or regulation.


         Date:  August 9, 2002           /s/ Robert C. Bishop
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: Robert C. Bishop
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer


         Date:  August 9, 2002           /s/ Heather A. Ellerkamp
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: Heather A. Ellerkamp
                                         Title: Chief Accounting Officer
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00358-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.F.C., A CHILD

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. D13-22170-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant’s first issue asserts that the trial court judge was disqualified from 

hearing the case. See TEX. CONST. ART. V, § 11; TEX. R. CIVIL P. 18. The trial court judge 

had been the prosecutor that represented the Department of Family and Protective 

Services in a much earlier Department proceeding involving the same child who is the 

subject of this proceeding. This prior representation was not called to the attention of the 

trial court and, particularly in light of the time since the prior representation, there is 

nothing in the record to indicate that the trial court had an independent recollection of 

that prior representation. The Department recognizes the merits of Appellant’s issue and 
In the Interest of D.F.C. Page 2

concedes that the trial court judge is constitutionally disqualified from being the trial 

court judge deciding this case. 

The Department asks that we sustain Appellant’s first issue, hold that the trial 

court judge erred by failing to sua sponte disqualify himself, and reverse the trial court’s 

judgment. We agree that is the proper disposition of the issue in this appeal. 

Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for 

further proceedings.1 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Reversed and remanded

Opinion delivered and filed April 16, 2015

[CV06]

 

1

In light of the Department’s concession, and to expedite the disposition of this appeal, we use Rule 2 of 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and suspend the normal 21 days’ notice required for submission. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 2; 39.8. Additionally, pursuant to Rule 18.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the 

mandate will issue with the Court’s judgment. TEX. R. APP. P. 18.6.