alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>




 <ARTICLE>                                                                   5
        
 <S>                                                                       <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                                                           6-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 DEC-31-1997
 <PERIOD-END>                                                      JUN-30-1997
 <CASH>                                                              3,091,169
 <SECURITIES>                                                                0
 <RECEIVABLES>                                                       8,456,354
 <ALLOWANCES>                                                        1,130,691
 <INVENTORY>                                                         3,685,758
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   15,047,989
 <PP&E>                                                              3,196,229
 <DEPRECIATION>                                                      1,103,912
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     37,985,212
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               8,673,423
 <BONDS>                                                                     0
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
 <PREFERRED>                                                                 0
 <COMMON>                                                                9,599
 <OTHER-SE>                                                         27,076,746
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       37,985,212
 <SALES>                                                            11,926,714
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   11,926,714
 <CGS>                                                               4,685,742
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       4,685,742
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   10,033,097
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       68,106
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    428,172
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   (3,090,532)
 <INCOME-TAX>                                                                0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               (3,090,532)
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
 <CHANGES>                                                                   0
 <NET-INCOME>                                                      (3,090,532)
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          (0.34)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                                          (0.34)
         
 


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.33
 
 SCHEDULE I
 CHANGE OF CONTROL
SEVERANCE PLAN PARTICIPANTS
 Benefit Level  3Baxter, Warner L.
    
    
    Moehn, MichaelCisel, Scott A.
    
    
    Naslund, Charles D.Cole, Daniel F.
    
    
    Nelson, Gregory L.Kelley, Richard A.
    
    
    Rainwater, Gary LLyons, Martin J.
    
    
    Sullivan, Steven R.Mark, Richard J.
    
    
    Voss, Thomas R.Martin, Donna K.
 Benefit Level  2Barnes, Lynn M.
    
    
    Mueller, Michael G.Birdsong, Jerre E.
    
    
    Neff, Robert K.Birk, Mark C.
    
    
    Nelson, Craig D.Borkowski, Maureen A.
    
    
    Ogden, StanBrawley, Mark
    
    
    Pate, Ron D.Bremer, Charles A.
    
    
    Power, Joseph M.Cissell, Richard
    
    
    Powers, Robert L.Evans, Ronald K.
    
    
    Prebil, William J.Foss, Karen
    
    
    Schepers, David J.Glaeser, Scott A.
    
    
    Schukar, ShawnHeflin, Adam C.
    
    
    Serri, Andrew M.Herrmann, Timothy E.
    
    
    Simpson, Jerry L.Iselin, Christopher A.
    
    
    Sobule, James A.Kidwell, Stephen M.
    
    
    Steinke, Bruce A.Lindgren, Mark C.
    
    
    Weisenborn, Dennis W.Menne, Michael L.
    
    
    Zdellar, Ronald C.Mosier, Don M.
Expires 11-30-2017
Order entered November 30, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00750-CV

NELLY SUAREZ GARCIA, Appellant

V.

LORRIE SEMLER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-04494

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 29, 2021 motion for an extension 

of time to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the 

brief tendered to this Court by appellant on November 29 filed as of the date of this 

order.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 1:30 P.M. CT February 28, 2019

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales

were sold under Announcement SMAC3, Invitation No. 5 dated February 19, 2019.

Catalog 

Lot No. 

Catalog 

Location Purchaser Pounds Sold

Price Sold 

(per Pound)

CCC 

Revenue

1 Marianna, AR American Fiber 478 .4029 $192.59

2 Marianna, AR American Fiber 1,913 .4029 $770.75

3 Marianna, AR American Fiber 1,400 .4029 $564.06

4 Marianna, AR American Fiber 1,963 .4029 $790.89

5 Marianna, AR American Fiber 493 .4029 $198.63

Total 6,247 $2,516.92
EPA Reg. No. 74530-16

Vol. 2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104 *Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

*Inert ingredient information may be en

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116 *Confidential Statement of Formula may be entitled to confide
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE SERAPHINE NUNEZ-SOSA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-72941

Agency No. A098-004-994

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 7, 2015** 

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Jose Seraphine Nunez-Sosa, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his

motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

FILED

APR 14 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen.

Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and

dismiss in part the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Nunez-Sosa’s motion to

reopen as untimely, where Nunez-Sosa filed the motion more than two years after

his order of removal became final, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (a motion to reopen

must be filed within 90 days of a final order of removal), and he does not dispute

that his motion was untimely or invoke any regulatory exception to the motions

deadline, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to exercise its sua

sponte authority to reopen removal proceedings, see Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder,

633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th Cir. 2011), and Nunez-Sosa’s request for prosecutorial

discretion, see Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (order). 

Nunez-Sosa’s contention that the BIA violated his due process rights by

failing to consider all of his claims is not supported by the record. 

Finally, we deny Nunez-Sosa’s renewed request for a stay of removal and

his request for remand. See Vilchiz-Soto, 688 F.3d at 644.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 13-72941
EXHIBIT 23.1

              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

     We consent to the  incorporation  by reference of our report dated  October
11, 2002 of Dyntek,  Inc. and  Subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 2002, in
the following Registration Statements filed by Dyntek, Inc. (including when such
registration  statements were originally filed and declared  effective under the
prior corporate names of Dyntek, Inc., including  Tekinsight.com Inc., Universal
Self Care,  Inc. and Tadeo  Holdings,  Inc.):  Form S-8  Registration  Statement
(Registration  No.  33-78426),  Form S-8  Registration  Statement  (Registration
No.33-93448),  FormS-8 Registration Statement (Registration  No.33-84941),  Form
S-8 Registration Statement  (Registration  No.333-65900),  Form S-8 Registration
Statement  (Registration No.  333-356902) and  Post-Effective  Amendment No.2 to
Form S-3 Registration  Statement  (Registration No. 333-31153),  included in the
Dyntek, Inc. report on Form 10Q for the period ended September 30, 2002.




New York, New York                        /s/ Grassi & Co., CPAs, P.C.
November 19, 2002                         ---------------------------
                                          Grassi & Co., CPAs, P.C.
                                          Certified Public Accountants
# C_2016202EN.01009501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/95 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/95

---

Article 115

(ex Article 94 TEC)

(ex Article 94 TEC)

Without prejudice to Article 114, the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, issue directives for the approximation of such laws, regulations or administrative provisions of the Member States as directly affect the establishment or functioning of the internal market.

---
## NO. 12

- 1 3

- 00 037

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

CHARLES F. SCOTT, III

, § APPEAL FROM THE 402ND

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

WOOD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COU RT

, APPELLEE § WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 42.3(a). The trial court’s judgment was signed on October 16, 2 012. Under

rule of appellate procedure 26.1(a), unless Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial or other

postjudgment motion that extended the appellate deadlines, his notice of appeal was due to have

been filed “within 30 days after the judgment [wa s] signed,” i.e., November 15, 2012. Appellant

filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. However, findings of fact and

conclusions of law are not proper when, as here, the appeal is from a summary judgment, and a

request for them does not extend the time in which to file a notice of appeal. Linwood v. NCNB

Tex. , 885 S.W.2d 102, 103 (Tex. 1994). Consequently, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on

November 15, 2012.

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on February 7, 2013. Because the notice of appeal

was not filed on or before November 15, 2012, the notice was untimely, and this court has no

jurisdiction to consider the appeal.

On February 7, 2013, this court notified Appellant pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42.3(a) that his notice of appeal was untimely. Appellant was further informed that if2

the record was not amended on or before February 19, 2013, to establish the jurisdiction of this

court, the appeal would be dismissed.

The February 19, 2013 deadline has now passed, and Appellant has not shown the

jurisdiction of this court or otherwise responded to its February 7, 2013 notice. Because this

court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as provided by Texas

Rules of Appellate Proc edure 26.1 and 26.3, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(a).

Opinion delivered February 28 , 2013.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)3 

## COUR T OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

FEBRUARY 28 , 2013

NO. 12

- 13

- 00037

- CV

CHARLES F. SCOTT, III

, Appellant

V.

WOOD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT

,

Appellee

Appeal from the 402nd Judicial District Court

of Wood County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 2012

- 202 )

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the

appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction ; and that this decision

be certified to the co urt below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. , and Hoyle , J.
76 P.3d 624

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### Norwest Bank Minnesota v. Lopez

24005

08/04/2003

Affirmed
##### 



Exhibit 10.9a
 CENTEX CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
 DEFERRED COMPENSATION AGREEMENT  May 10, 2007 Award
 Centex Corporation
    SECTION 1. The Plan.
  SECTION 2. Amount of Award.
  SECTION 3. Terms of Award.
 3.1. Account.
 1




---



##### 



3.2. Beneficiary.
 3.3. Interest.
 3.4. Vesting.
  2




---



##### 



Vesting Percentage ofVesting Dates
    
    Deferred Cash CompensationMarch 31, 2008
    
    
    33.33
    %March 31, 2009
    
    
    33.33
    %March 31, 2010
    
    
    33.34
    %100.00
    %
 3.5. Timing and Form of Distribution
  3.6. Tax Withholding.
 SECTION 4. General Provisions.
 4.1.
 3




---



##### 



4.2.
 4.3.
  PARTICIPANT
 CENTEX CORPORATION By:[Name][Title] 4
Exhibit 10.33



3rd EXTENSION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



This 3rdExtension of Employment Agreement (this Agreement) effective as of May 3, 2005, by and between CARROLS CORPORATION (Employer), a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware having an address at 968 James
Street, Syracuse, New York 13203 and DANIEL T. ACCORDINO whose principal residence is 6556 Ridgewood Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 (Employee).



| | 1. | Employer and Employee previously entered into a certain employment agreement dated January 1, 1995, as amended April 3, 1996, as further amended and restated on March 27, 1997, as
further amended and extended on April 1, 2002 and as further extended on November 11, 2004 (the Employment Agreement), which agreement is due to expire on December 31, 2005.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Employer and Employee have agreed to extend the term of the Employment Agreement to December 31, 2006.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | The Carrols Corporation Compensation Committee has approved the extension of the Employment Agreement as herein provided.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | By this Agreement, the Employment Agreement is extended through December 31, 2006, upon all terms and conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and have caused this
Extension of Employment Agreement to be executed as May 3, 2005.



CARROLS CORPORATION/s/ Joseph A. ZirkmanName:

Joseph A. ZirkmanTitle:

Vice President/s/ Daniel T. AccordinoDaniel T. Accordino
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

(512) 463-1312

June 29, 2018

Mr. Scott S. Hershman

Lackey Hershman, LLP

3102 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 777

Dallas, TX 75219-4241

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mr. Robert Mark Millimet

Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors

1717 Main Street, Suite 5900

Dallas, TX 75201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Ms. Deborah G. Hankinson

Hankinson LLP

750 N. St. Paul Street, Suite 1800

Dallas, TX 75201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 16-0770

Court of Appeals Number: 05-15-00580-CV

Trial Court Number: DF-15-00596

Style: IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF I.C. AND Q.C. AND IN THE INTEREST

OF S.C. AND K.C., CHILDREN

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinions and judgment in the abovereferenced cause. You may obtain a copy of the opinions and judgment through Case Search on

our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/supreme.aspx. On the Case Search page

simply enter the case number and push the Search button to find the docket page for your case.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

(512) 463-1312

cc: District Clerk Dallas County (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Bruce E. Bagelman (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Ms. Lisa Matz (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. William Richard (Rick) Thompson II (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Craig T. Enoch (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Ms. Shelby L. O'Brien (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. William A. Brewer III (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Jan Michal Zapendowski (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Lawrence Lee Budner (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
# C_2016203EN.01004601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/46

---

Article 189

The seat of the institutions of the Community shall be determined by common accord of the governments of the Member States.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000879437
<NAME> INFOUSA INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          38,489
<SECURITIES>                                    15,290
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,968
<PP&E>                                          75,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 264,193
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,359
<BONDS>                                        118,498
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   264,193
<SALES>                                        113,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,118
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,248
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,870
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    128
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,998
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
-79.5 -79.0 -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5

 38.0

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/29

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
#### State v. Meyer

25436

08/10/2004

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 129 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 12
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 129

                          [Report No. 114-31]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 35) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2015, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2015

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 35) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2015, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 35) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2015, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the joint 
resolution are waived. The joint resolution shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the joint resolution 
are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.
                                                  House Calendar No. 12

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 129

                          [Report No. 114-31]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 35) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2015, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 26, 2015

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00360-CR

Daniel Rossi

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From County Criminal Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1441426)

April 27, 2017

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the trial court’s 

order is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel