alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32**





Written
      Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. ' 1350





Solely
      for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ' 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the
      undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cal-Maine
      Foods, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 3, 2006 (the
      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.









/s/
      Fred R. Adams, Jr.


Fred
      R.
      Adams, Jr.


Chief
      Executive Officer








/s/
      Timothy A. Dawson


Timothy
      A. Dawson


Chief
      Financial Officer





Date:
      August 16, 2006





73
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3

                                   CERTIFICATE

                                       OF

                               RETIREMENT OF STOCK

                                       OF

                                   ALTEON INC.

         Pursuant to Section 243 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, Alteon
Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware (the "Corporation"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:

         1. The Certificate of Designations of 6% Cumulative Convertible
Preferred Stock of the Corporation provides that shares of the Corporation's 6%
Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the "6% Preferred Stock") acquired by
the Corporation by reason of redemption, purchase, conversion or otherwise shall
not be reissued.

         2. All 5,000 shares of the 6% Preferred Stock issued by the Corporation
were acquired by the Corporation by December 4, 1997 by reason of conversion and
were retired on such date.

         3. Effective December 4, 1997, as a result of such retirement of the 6%
Preferred Stock, the total number of shares of Preferred Stock which the
Corporation is authorized to issue is 1,993,329 shares.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate of Retirement of Stock is made
this 10th day of February, 1998.

                                             ALTEON INC.

                                             By:      /s/ James J. Mauzey
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      James J. Mauzey
                                                      Chairman and
                                                      Chief Executive Officer

ATTEST:

By: /s/ Elizabeth A. O'Dell
   ------------------------------
   Elizabeth A. O'Dell
   Secretary
RUTF

Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food

for children with Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM)

N ̊ Contrat:

Date de fabrication:

À consommer de 

préférence avant:

N ̊ lot:

Contract Number:

Date of Manufacture:

Best used by date:

Lot no.:

500kcal

Ingredients:

» Tear off tab of package and squeeze 

bite size contents into mouth.

 consume in , » Once package is opened

. ya one d

en less than 6 r or child f » Not suitable 

. e months of ag
#### FLEET MORTGAGE CORPORATION *v.*TABATHA CANDELARIO ET AL.

(AC 19720)

Foti, Landau and Zarella, Js.

Submitted on briefs May 11

officially released June 6, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
# C_2016202EN.01019601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/196 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/196

---

Article 351

(ex Article 307 TEC)

(ex Article 307 TEC)

The rights and obligations arising from agreements concluded before 1 January 1958 or, for acceding States, before the date of their accession, between one or more Member States on the one hand, and one or more third countries on the other, shall not be affected by the provisions of the Treaties.

To the extent that such agreements are not compatible with the Treaties, the Member State or States concerned shall take all appropriate steps to eliminate the incompatibilities established. Member States shall, where necessary, assist each other to this end and shall, where appropriate, adopt a common attitude.

In applying the agreements referred to in the first paragraph, Member States shall take into account the fact that the advantages accorded under the Treaties by each Member State form an integral part of the establishment of the Union and are thereby inseparably linked with the creation of common institutions, the conferring of powers upon them and the granting of the same advantages by all the other Member States.

---
181 P.3d 434

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

April 18, 2008

28671

#### State v. Kudoba

Affirmed
Exhibit 32



      Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of SecureCARE Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dennis
Nasto, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Neil Burley, as Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:

1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ DENNIS NASTO
-----------------------------------------------
Name:   Dennis Nasto
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)


/s/ NEIL BURLEY
-----------------------------------------------
Name:   Neil Burley
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date:  March 30, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to SecureCARE Technologies, Inc. and
will be retained by SecureCARE Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Dorothy M. Arnold, as Guardian ad Litem of Don D. Arnold, an Infant, et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Rosa M. Williams et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

April 15, 1959.

*Benjamin E. Lander*for plaintiffs.

*Thomas J. Flood*for defendants.

Irving H. Saypol, J.

Motion by plaintiff to vacate notice of examination before trial before a notary public (1) of infant plaintiff because of his tender age, and (2) his guardian ad litem because she is not the proper party to be examined, and cross motion by defendant for such examination. The infant will attain the age of seven on April 19. His guardian ad litem contends that since he is incapable of being sworn before a notary, his examination should be barred.

There is no fixed age limit as to an infant’s competency as a witness. That question is sui generis in each case *(Blagburn*v. *Milrita Realty Cory.,*204 Misc. 74; *Palmieri*v. *Salsimo Realty Co.,*202 Misc. 251). The court must pursue more than perfunctory procedures before an infant’s testimony will be compelled. Examination of the plaintiff herein before a notary public would accordingly be improper since his competency to testify could not be determined by proper authority nor is there *954any assurance that safeguards would be taken for his protection (see *Alsante*v. *Roberts,*118 N. Y. S. 2d 683; *Jones*v. *Jones,*17 Misc 2d 1076).

Regarding the examination of the guardian ad litem, it is clear that while appearance by a guardian may be necessary, the infant still remains the real party in interest (Civ. Prac. Act, § 202; *Merritt*v. *Greenberg,*4 F. Supp. 655), and it is improper to examine the guardian ad litem as a party (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288; *Alsante*v. *Roberts, supra).*However, the guardian ad litem here is also suing in her individual capacity. An examination limited to her claim would, therefore, be appropriate.

Motion and cross motion are accordingly disposed of as follows: Let the infant plaintiff attend at Special Term, Part n of this court on April 27, 1959 at 10:00 a.m. for a determination by the court as to his examination. Examination before trial of the guardian ad litem is granted only insofar as to her individual claim. Unless otherwise stipulated, let this examination take place on April 27, 1959 pursuant to the original notice but at Special Term, Part II.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1377 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the treatment of 

veterans who participated in the cleanup of Enewetak Atoll as radiation 

exposed veterans for purposes of the presumption of service-connection 

of certain disabilities by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2019 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Mr. AGUILAR, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. BEYER, Ms. 

BONAMICI, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. CASE, Ms. JUDY CHU of 

California, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. DEFAZIO, 

Ms. DEGETTE, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. 

ENGEL, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. FOSTER, Ms. GABBARD, 

Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HARDER of California, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. HECK, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Mr. 

HIMES, Ms. JAYAPAL, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mr. KILMER, Mr. KIND, 

Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. 

LOWENTHAL, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mrs. LURIA, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of 

New York, Mr. MASSIE, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. MOORE, Mr. MOULTON, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

PALLONE, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. PAPPAS, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. PERLMUTTER, 

Mr. PETERS, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. POCAN, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, 

Mr. QUIGLEY, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Miss RICE of New York, Ms. ROYBALALLARD, Mr. RUSH, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. SABLAN, Mr. SCHNEIDER, 

Mr. SERRANO, Mr. SIRES, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. 

SWALWELL of California, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. 

TITUS, Mrs. TORRES of California, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mrs. WATSON

COLEMAN, Mr. WELCH, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. YARMUTH, 

Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. BYRNE, and Mr. GOMEZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1377 IH

treatment of veterans who participated in the cleanup 

of Enewetak Atoll as radiation exposed veterans for purposes of the presumption of service-connection of certain 

disabilities by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mark Takai Atomic 

5 Veterans Healthcare Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF VETERANS WHO PARTICIPATED IN 

7 CLEANUP OF ENEWETAK ATOLL AS RADI8 ATION EXPOSED VETERANS FOR PURPOSES 

9 OF PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE-CONNECTION 

10 OF CERTAIN DISABILITIES BY DEPARTMENT 

11 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

12 Section 1112(c)(3)(B) of title 38, United States 

13 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

14 clause: 

15 ‘‘(v) Cleanup of Enewetak Atoll dur16 ing the period beginning on January 1, 

17 1977, and ending on December 31, 

18 1980.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-15-00066-CR 

LUIS ANGEL AGUILERA, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 47th District Court 

Potter County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 68,551-A, Honorable Dan L. Schaap, Presiding 

 

April 20, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant filed a document with the trial court on February 19, 2015, that 

indicated his desire to appeal his November 19, 2014 conviction for manslaughter and 

resulting eighteen-year sentence of incarceration.1 However, because it appeared that 

appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely, by letter dated March 11, this Court notified 

appellant that it appeared the appeal was untimely and directed appellant to show 

cause, by April 6, why his appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

 

1

The judgment confirms that appellant was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to eighteen 

years’ incarceration. Sentence was imposed in open court on November 19, 2014.
2

Appellant filed a response but it does not show how this Court has jurisdiction over the 

present appeal. Consequently, we dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is 

imposed or suspended in open court or within ninety days after that date if a motion for 

new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Appellant did not file a motion for new 

trial. Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on December 19, 2014. Because 

appellant’s notice of appeal was filed two months after the deadline, this Court is without 

jurisdiction over this appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1996). As such, we have no authority to take any action other than to dismiss the 

appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo, 918 

S.W.2d at 523. The Court of Criminal Appeals has recently reiterated that the timely 

filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to appeal. See Castillo 

v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). 

As such, we now dismiss the purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.2

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

 

2

Appellant may have recourse by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the 

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

ANN. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2007); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 525 n.8 (“the exclusive post-conviction remedy 

in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. [ANN.] art. 11.07.”); Parr v. State, 206 S.W.3d 143, 145 (Tex. App—Waco 2006, no pet.).
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12359Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Jermeil Duggins (not verified)PermalinkMarch 22, 2023 - 3:39amCongratulation guys a job well done. I know it can be rough and a lot of pressure on individuals as a whole. But overall the job has been completed thanks to your help.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         471,419
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,480,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (68,990)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,917,134
<PP&E>                                      35,902,605
<DEPRECIATION>                              (3,051,414)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,447,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,234,477
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        277
<COMMON>                                       123,819
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,230,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,447,677
<SALES>                                      7,270,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,073,117
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,481,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,250,484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             5,050,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,061,017
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,088,473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,992,547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (1,432,973)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,381,438)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.38)
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1198 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

404 South Boulder Highway in Henderson, Nevada, as the ‘‘Henderson 

Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2019 

Mrs. LEE of Nevada (for herself, Mr. HORSFORD, Ms. TITUS, and Mr. 

AMODEI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 404 South Boulder Highway in Henderson, 

Nevada, as the ‘‘Henderson Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HENDERSON VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OF4 FICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 404 South Boulder Highway in 

7 Henderson, Nevada, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Henderson Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1198 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Henderson Veterans 

5 Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
financial statements of HPI for the 3 months ended December 1997, and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         0 
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,759
<INVENTORY>                                    63
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,992
<PP&E>                                         2,872
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,778
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       149
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,216)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,353
<SALES>                                        1,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,969
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (668)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (668)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (668)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.09)
        


</TABLE>