alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00313

- CV
Propel Financial Services, LLC v. Conquer Land Utilities, LLC
On Appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 4914

- 17

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, hav ing considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee , Conquer Land Utilities, LLC. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 18, 2019
27080

#### State v. Basuel

Vacated in Part, Remanded in Part; Affirmed
# Presidential Determination on the Proposed Agreement for Cooperation Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Energy

I have considered the proposed Agreement for Cooperation between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy (the “proposed Agreement”), along with the views, recommendations, and statements of the interested departments and agencies.

I have determined that the performance of the proposed Agreement will promote, and will not constitute an unreasonable risk to, the common defense and security. Pursuant to section 123 b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2153(b)), I hereby approve the proposed Agreement and authorize the Secretary of State to arrange for its execution.

                    The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2023-26134

Billing code 4710-10-P
#### Roy B. POWELL and Bill Howard, Petitioners, v. Frank H. SEAY, District Judge of the District Court of Seminole County, Wewoka Division, Oklahoma, Respondent.

No. 49201.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Sept. 14, 1976.

Rehearing Denied March 7, 1977.

Roy B. Powell, Dist. Atty., 22nd Dist. of Oklahoma, Ada, for petitioners.

Jack A. Mattingly, James E. Driscoll, Seminole, for respondent.

LAVENDER, Justice:

Walker Watts (Watts), as plaintiff, brought an action for damages against the defendants, Roy B. Powell, District Attorney, and Bill Howard (Howard), an investigator on the District Attorney’s staff.

Petition, in separate causes of action, alleges two wrongful acts by Howard as the staff investigator for Powell. One alleged incident involved seeking Watts’s testimony against Sheriff Merryfield in return for not criminally prosecuting Watts on a charge whose innocence was allegedly known by Powell and Howard. The other alleged incident involved a threat of continued investigation and prosecution of Watts unless he took a lie detector test. Trial court overruled separate pleas to jurisdiction by Powell and Howard. These defendants bring this original action seeking prohibition against the trial judge to proceed further based on immunity. We agree.

This action is controlled by this court’s opinion in *Powell v. Seay, Dist. Judge,*Okl., 553 P.2d 161 (1976). There we recognized immunity where acts committed are intrinsic part of the prosecutorial function. The acts complained of here were a part of the district attorney’s investigation and an intrinsic part of his prosecutorial function. That immunity extends to his staff performing that investigation under his authority and control.

A writ of prohibition is issued restraining respondent district judge of Seminole County, Wewoka Division from proceeding further in said cause.

Jurisdiction assumed and Writ of Prohibition granted.

WILLIAMS, C. J., and BERRY, BARNES and SIMMS, JJ., concur.

*556HODGES, V. C. J., concurs by reason of stare decisis and IRWIN and DOOLIN, JJ., dissent.
Amendment to Security Agreement
                               Dated June 22, 1995
              Between Sunrise Leasing Corporation ("Borrower") and
                   King Holding Corporation ("Secured Party")


         Borrower wishes to finance $1,955,038.85 of Equipment under its current
facility  with  Secured  Party  under the same  terms and  conditions  except as
changed  herein,  by providing  Secured Party with  Collateral  pursuant to this
Security  Agreement.  Secured Party agrees to advance  $1,955,038.85 to Borrower
under the terms and conditions below.

         All  capitalized  terms not herein defined shall have the meaning given
them in the Security Agreement dated June 22, 1995.

         Borrower shall amortize this outstanding balance by making semi-monthly
payments to Secured Party as follows:

                           October 15, 1996          $102,883.07
                           October 31, 1996          $102,883.06
                           November 15, 1996         $ 92,831.66

         Within 60 days from the date funds are advanced to  Borrower,  Borrower
shall pay such remaining  principal  amount  previously  advanced  together with
interest on the unpaid balance.

         All other terms and  conditions  of the Security  Agreement  remain the
same.



Sunrise Leasing Corporation               King Management Corporation



By:  /s/ Barry J. Schwach                 By:  /s/ Peter J. King
Its: Chief Financial Officer              Its:  President
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TIMOTHY HIGHTOWER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 23

- 517

[ August 31, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Steven J. Levin , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 2015CF002029B

.

Robert David Malove of The Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A.,

Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, D AMOORGIAN and C IKLIN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8


                          Third Amendment to Memorandum
                           OEM Manufacturing Agreement



         The Memorandum OEM Manufacturing Agreement ("MOEMMA") with an effective
date of January 9, 2002 by and among EchoStar Satellite Corporation, EchoStar
Technologies Corporation and Thomson multimedia, Inc. is hereby amended as
follows:

         1.       The 6th sentence of Section 2.4 is amended to read:

         In the event that for any reason an agreement [CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
         REDACTED] has not been executed by Licensee, ETC and ESC on
         [CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REDACTED], then notwithstanding anything else
         in this MOEMMA to the contrary, this MOEMMA shall terminate.

         2.       The MOEMMA shall remain in all other respects unchanged.


Echostar Satellite Corporation      Echostar Technologies Corporation

By:                                 By:
         -------------------------          ---------------------------
Title:                              Title:
         -------------------------          ---------------------------
Date:                               Date:
         -------------------------          ---------------------------

Thomson multimedia Inc.

By:
         -------------------------
Title:
         -------------------------
Date:
         -------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned officers of AutoImmune Inc. (the Company)
hereby certify that, as of the date of this statement, the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act) and that, to the best of their knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company and the results of
operations of the Company.

The purpose of this certification is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This statement is not filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that
Act or any other federal or state law or regulation.



|                      |  |        |  |                                  
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  |        |  | /S/ ROBERT C. BISHOP             
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Robert C. Bishop                 
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer          
|                      |  |       
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  |        |  | /S/ DIANE M.
MCCLINTOCK          
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Diane M. McClintock              
|                      |  | Title: |  | Director of Finance and Treasurer
October 23, 1996

17660

#### State v. Siaris

Order *No. 96-30*

Affirmed
# C_2016202EN.01006801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/68

---

Article 51

(ex Article 45 TEC)

(ex Article 45 TEC)

The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply, so far as any given Member State is concerned, to activities which in that State are connected, even occasionally, with the exercise of official authority.

The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, may rule that the provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to certain activities.

---
# C_2016202EN.01039501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/395 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/395

---

Article 8

Protection of personal data

1.   Everyone has the right to the protection of personal data concerning him or her.

2.   Such data must be processed fairly for specified purposes and on the basis of the consent of the person concerned or some other legitimate basis laid down by law. Everyone has the right of access to data which has been collected concerning him or her, and the right to have it rectified.

3.   Compliance with these rules shall be subject to control by an independent authority.

---
Casie Walker

Burnet County District Clerk

1701 East Polk Street, Suite 90

Burnet, Texas 78611-2757

Phone (512) 756-5450

April 20, 2015

Court of Appeals - First District of Texas

Re: Court of Appeals Number: 01-14-00109-CV

Trail Court Case Number: 7723

Style: The State of Texas

v.

Jeffery Steven Marx

This letter is to inform the Court there has been no hearing on indigency nor has 

there been any contest to the affidavit.

Sincerely,

Casie Walker

District Clerk

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/20/2015 2:48:14 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOHN DAVID WILSON, JR. , Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 3396

[ July 13, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nine teenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Elizabeth A. Metzger , Judge; L.T. Case No. 21

- 1100

- CA

.
John David Wilson, Jr., Indiantown , pro se.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. Solages

Jones , Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Be ach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH , C

. J., C IKLIN and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 10.2
								      

March 12, 1997

Woody Benson
14 Forest Avenue
Newton, MA  02165

Dear Woody:

This letter summarizes revised salary and severance terms that we have agreed
to:

New base salary, effective from January 1, 1997, is $250,000 annually.

Upon notice of termination, whether involuntary or voluntary, the following
severance package will take effect:

* Employment will be continued for 6 months from date of notice that you will
effectively cease active employment.  This will enable you to continue to vest
in your options and extends the time period during which you are able to
exercise such options.  You will effectively have 2 additional months following
termination to exercise such options for an overall total exercise period of 8
months from date that you cease active employment.

* You will continue to receive your base salary for a period of 6 months
following the date that you effectively cease active employment.  No incentive
compensation or commission compensation will be paid during this 6 month
period.

* You will continue to receive medical and dental benefits for the 6 month
period following notice of termination.

* You will continue to participate in Shiva's 401(k) Plan for the 6 month
period following notice of termination.

* You will continue to be eligible for life and disability insurance programs
offered by Shiva for the 6 month period following notice of termination.

The above benefits are contingent upon my receipt of an executed release at the
time of notice of termination.


Very truly yours,



Frank Ingari
President & CEO
Shiva Corporation



 <PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 950 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 950

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to prohibit automated traffic 
                  enforcement, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2015

Mr. Perlmutter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to prohibit automated traffic 
                  enforcement, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prohibiting Automated Traffic 
Enforcement Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. AUTOMATED TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROHIBITION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 3 of title 23, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 330. Automated traffic enforcement prohibition
    ``(a) Prohibition.--Except as provided in subsection (b), a covered 
entity may not utilize an automated traffic enforcement system for 
purposes of law enforcement.
    ``(b) Exceptions.--The prohibition under subsection (a) does not 
apply to the following:
            ``(1) A school zone.
            ``(2) A construction zone.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions 
apply:
            ``(1) Automated traffic enforcement system.--The term 
        `automated traffic enforcement system' has the meaning given 
        that term in section 402(c)(4)(B) of this title.
            ``(2) Construction zone.--The term `construction zone' 
        means any segment of roadway open to traffic and immediately 
        adjacent to land on which repair, maintenance, construction or 
        related work is being conducted.
            ``(3) Covered entity.--The term `covered entity' means each 
        of the following:
                    ``(A) A State.
                    ``(B) A local governmental authority.
            ``(4) Local governmental authority.--The term `local 
        governmental authority' has the meaning given that term in 
        section 5302 of title 49.
            ``(5) School zone.--The term `school zone' means any 
        segment of roadway that is not more than 300 feet from the 
        property of a school.
            ``(6) State.--The term `State' has the meaning given that 
        term in section 5302 of title 49.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The analysis for such chapter is amended 
by adding at the end the following:

``330. Automated traffic enforcement prohibition.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date that is 60 days after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016202EN.01001801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/18

---

Article 4

1.   In accordance with Article 5, competences not conferred upon the Union in the Treaties remain with the Member States.

2.   The Union shall respect the equality of Member States before the Treaties as well as their national identities, inherent in their fundamental structures, political and constitutional, inclusive of regional and local self-government. It shall respect their essential State functions, including ensuring the territorial integrity of the State, maintaining law and order and safeguarding national security. In particular, national security remains the sole responsibility of each Member State.

3.   Pursuant to the principle of sincere cooperation, the Union and the Member States shall, in full mutual respect, assist each other in carrying out tasks which flow from the Treaties.

The Member States shall take any appropriate measure, general or particular, to ensure fulfilment of the obligations arising out of the Treaties or resulting from the acts of the institutions of the Union.

The Member States shall facilitate the achievement of the Union's tasks and refrain from any measure which could jeopardise the attainment of the Union's objectives.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-Q--MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         155,993
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,249
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          259,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   103,283,861
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,249
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  403,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               634,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,035,893)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,036,693)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.034)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.034)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

I, Michael S. Sarner, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:

 

|  | 1. |  | The Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2018 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|  | 2. |  | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|                     |   |                                       |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
| Date:  June 5, 2018 | By:    | /s/ Michael S. Sarner                      |
|                     |   | Michael S. Sarner

Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----