alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply610Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Tiffany J Stah... (not verified)PermalinkNovember 28, 2018 - 7:45pmHow wonderful it was to stumble upon this today! Jim, my friend, it is a joy to see how well you are doing and how successful you have become.  Congratulations for all of your achievements.  My very best to you and your family!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
**Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of *info*USA Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that to myknowledge on the date hereof, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.Date: August 9, 2007         */s/ Stormy L. Dean*   Stormy L. Dean,   Chief Financial Officer        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.     The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission asour exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Form10-Q.
##### 



(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Partnership.
  By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Cronos Capital Corp.,General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of CronosCapital Corp., General Partner of the Partnership
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
#### George M. Donohue, Respondent-Appellant, v John R. Minicucci, Appellant-Respondent.

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff sued defendant for legal services based upon the theory of a joint venture whereby plaintiff and defendant would split the fees equally. At a bench trial, the court determined that there was no joint venture and awarded plaintiff the sum of $13,500 on the basis of quantum meruit. We reverse. The court improperly granted judgment for plaintiff on the theory of quantum meruit. Although CPLR 3017 authorizes the court to grant any type relief even if it is not requested, the relief must be appropriate to the proof. Moreover, relief that is not requested may not be granted where there is substantial prejudice to the adverse party *(see,*3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶3017.06). Plaintiff did not plead a cause of action on the theory of quantum meruit and he did not submit proof of the reasonable value of his services. By not alerting defendant to the issue, plaintiff caused substantial prejudice to defendant by depriving him of the opportunity to submit evidence of the reasonable value of the services. Our reversal of the judgment and dismissal of the complaint does not, however, preclude plaintiff from bringing a new action based on quantum meruit *(see, Bialostok v Wolfer,*191 Misc 385). (Appeals from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Fallon, J.—Breach of Contract.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
# C_2016202EN.01040001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/400 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/400

---

Article 33

Family and professional life

1.   The family shall enjoy legal, economic and social protection.

2.   To reconcile family and professional life, everyone shall have the right to protection from dismissal for a reason connected with maternity and the right to paid maternity leave and to parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child.

---
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Brian E. Dearing, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network Services, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;Dated: December 15, 2005         By: /s/ Brian E. Dearing     By: Brian E. Dearing    Title: Chairman, President and CEO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7846

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. PAUL OSARIASE MONDAY OMOREGBEE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:99-cr-00055-BO-1; 5:06-cv-00509-BO)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 2, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Osariase Monday Omoregbee, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Paul Osariase Monday Omoregbee seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Omoregbee has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Omoregbee’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul R.
Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 2, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|/s/ PAUL R. FLANDERS                                                                 
|Paul R. Flanders
Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer March 18, 2011
# C_2016202EN.01035801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/358 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/358

---

62.   Declaration by the Republic of Poland concerning the Protocol on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in relation to Poland and the United Kingdom

Declaration by the Republic of Poland concerning the Protocol on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in relation to Poland and the United Kingdom

Poland declares that, having regard to the tradition of social movement of "Solidarity" and its significant contribution to the struggle for social and labour rights, it fully respects social and labour rights, as established by European Union law, and in particular those reaffirmed in Title IV of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

---
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply12262Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Nanette Gibbs (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 3, 2023 - 7:03amThe article serves as a tribute to all who work with their hands.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
Building a Resilient Food System from Farm to Fork

AMS is leading USDA’s response to the President’s Executive Orders to strengthen America’s supply chains and ensure 

farmers have greater opportunities to access markets and receive a fair return for their products. Since 2021, we’ve 

implemented new programs to build resiliency in the food system moving forward.

Created 

More, New & 

Better Markets

$400M for Dairy Donation Program

$100M+ for Dairy Business Innovation initiatives

$25M for technical assistance to meat & poultry processors 

(MPPTA)

$60M for small meat processors to access federal 

inspections (MPIRG)

$300M for transitioning to organic initiatives

Up to $4M for funding access to 

shipping containers

Increased 

Competition

Proposed Regulations to modernize the 

Packers & Stockyards Act

Stronger organic enforcement

A Farmer Fairness portal with DOJ

Built 

Capacity & 

Equity

$400M to launch USDA Regional Food Business Centers

$130M additional LAMP funding to support farm-toinstitution initiatives 

$2.6M for research with 1890s institutions to 

improve grant access for underserved entities

9 projects launched to strengthen 

organic oversight

Delivered 

Pandemic 

Assistance

$350M to assist dairy farmers

$100M in grants to support food businesses

$700M to non-profits, state & Tribal 

governments for farm & food workers

$51M to state & tribal

seafood processors

Expanded 

Access to 

Nutritious Food

$900M for states & tribes to help local & underserved 

growers & communities (LFPA)

$200M for states to buy Local Food for Schools

6+ million boxes of fresh produce (The 

Emergency Food Assistance Program)

Agricultural Marketing Service, 2023. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
FOR PUBLICATION



### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

D ONNA K AY L EE , Petitioner

- Appellant
,

v.

D EBRA J ACQUEZ , Respondent

- Appellee. No. 12

- 56258

D.C. No. 2:01

- cv

- 10751

- PA

- PLA

ORDER

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed September 6, 2016

Before: Mary M. Schroeder
, Harry Pregerson , and Jacqueline H. Nguyen , Circuit Judges.

ORDER
Pursuant to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Johnson v. Lee , ___ U.S.___, 136 S. Ct. 1802 (2016), the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

.
#### Fukida v. Hon/Hawaii Service and Repair

22514

09/05/2001

Granted

97 Hawai'i 38, 33 P.3d 204
# C_2016202EN.01007101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/71

---

Article 63

(ex Article 56 TEC)

(ex Article 56 TEC)

1.   Within the framework of the provisions set out in this Chapter, all restrictions on the movement of capital between Member States and between Member States and third countries shall be prohibited.

2.   Within the framework of the provisions set out in this Chapter, all restrictions on payments between Member States and between Member States and third countries shall be prohibited.

---
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply591Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Ray Kluga (not... (not verified)PermalinkDecember 9, 2018 - 10:08amThanks, Marty for an intriguing article on the capitol lions! I‚Äôd like to add a clarification on the Lion Gate of Mycenae date: it‚Äôs 13th Century BC...keep up the good work.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
27875

#### State v. Vesper

.Affirmed, Vacated and Remanded
#### James v. James

16826

9/20/96

Affirmed in part and Vacated
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAE L ANDREW FOREMAN

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

S t ate

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 042

- CR

Appeal from the

County Crim Ct No 9

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 1196029 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until August 2 , 2013

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE APPELLANT ’ S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Abe Factor

, the Appellant ’ s Attorney , prepare the

Appellant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 2 , 201 3

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 6 th day of Ju ly , 201 3

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
#### C. E. MOORE, Collector, Appellant, v. Fredena M. WILKINS, Administratrix, Charles M. Wilkins, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 8057.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 13, 1939.

E. B. Freed and E. L. Foote, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Guarnieri & Anderson, of Warren, Ohio, for appellee.

Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and ARANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon appeal from a judgment of the District Court, 24 F.Supp. 670, for the recovery by the appellee of federal income taxes paid by her decedent.

It appearing that the deceased taxpayer was employed under written agreement with the Mahoning Valley Sanitary District, State of Ohio, as attorney for the District to perform such legal services as might from time to time be required by the Board of Directors of the District, upon a retainer of $250 per month and additional compensation for legal services in writing opinions, examining titles, drawing contracts, and conducting condemnation proceedings, to be paid at the usual rate paid for like services in the City of Youngstown; and

It further appearing that though the employment of an attorney by the Board is authorized by the General Code of Ohio, the taxpayer’s duties were not defined by statute nor his compensation fixed by law; that he was not required to take an oath of office or give bond; that he was not required to devote his entire time to his duties as attorney for the District but was permitted to engage in the general practice of law; and

It being the view of the court, the burden being upon the taxpayer to establish his status as an officer of the state or of one of its subdivisions or instrumentalities exercising a governmental function, and that he failed to sustain that burden by the application of the tests laid down in Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U.S. 514, 46 S.Ct. 172, 70 L.Ed. 384, followed by us *1019in Pease v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6 Cir., 83 F.2d 122; and

It being also the view of the court that the taxpayer’s immunity from income taxation, even though not destroyed by the application of the rule of the above cases, must now be denied upon the authority of Helvering v. Gerhardt, 304 U.S. 405, 58 S.Ct. 969, 82 L.Ed. 1427, announced since decision below; and

It being also the view of the court that the finding made below that the taxpayer was regular employee of a political subdivision of Ohio employed by statutory authority and engaged in the exercise of a governmental function and so that the taxpayer is immune to federal taxation is a conclusion of law based upon application of constitutional interpretation now rejected by the Supreme Court and is, therefore, not controlling even though the precise question upon which decision must depend was not argued at the trial and is not made the subject of an assignment of error; Now, therefore:

It is hereby ordered that the judgment below be and it is hereby reversed and that the cause be remanded for new trial with decision to be governed by the conclusions herein set forth.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2014

t0721

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2014

148826

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148826

COA: 310330 

Wayne CC: 11-012848-FH

NAKILA KANYATTA KING,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 14, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.