alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Aventura  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Craig
A.  Waltzer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  my  knowledge:

(1)     The  report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



January  23,  2006           By:     /s/  Craig  A.  Waltzer
                                     -----------------------
                                     Craig  A.  Waltzer
                                     Chief  Executive  Officer,  President  and
                                     Director
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply572Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Vicki V. (not ... (not verified)PermalinkAugust 17, 2017 - 2:48pmGod Bless you Bill.
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<CIK>  0000092487
<NAME>  SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
<SUBSIDIARY>
<NUMBER> 005
<NAME> SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                              1,847,189
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                5,782
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   159,407
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                   4,974
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                            90,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         2,107,798
<COMMON>                                                 135,660
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                245,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                      288,018
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                           668,678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                4,706
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                     605,973
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                       140,897
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                             45,595
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                           641,949
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                          2,107,798
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                965,027
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                      38,506
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                               778,997
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                               817,503
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                  147,524
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                        (1,965)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                           145,559
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  58,893
<NET-INCOME>                                              83,655
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                  229
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                             83,426
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                  96,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                 38,380
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                   154,942
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0


</TABLE>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

289 KA 12-00707 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LAMAR DAVIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT B. HALLBORG, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. SMALL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J.), rendered July 10, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for resentencing.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]), defendant contends that County Court failed to apprehend the extent of its sentencing discretion. We agree. Contrary to the People’s contention, defendant’s contention survives his waiver of the right to appeal and does not require preservation ( see People v Dunham , 83 AD3d 1423, 1424-1425, lv denied 17 NY3d 794). The court informed defendant during the plea proceeding that the minimum sentence it could impose was 5 years of incarceration and 5 years of postrelease supervision, when in fact the court had the authority to impose a period of postrelease supervision of between 21⁄2 years and 5 years ( see § 70.45 [2] [f]). “The failure of the court to apprehend the extent of its discretion deprived defendant of the right to be sentenced as provided by law” ( People v Hager , 213 AD2d 1008, 1008; see People v Slattery , 81 AD3d 1415, 1416). We therefore modify the judgment by vacating the sentence, and we remit the matter to County Court for resentencing.

Entered: March 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seen on Screen TV Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Antoine Jarjour, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 10th day of July, 2012.








ANTOINE JARJOURAntoine JarjourChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
65 P.3d 182

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### Foo v. Foo

24158

01/10/2003

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated and remanded
#### Robert B. NIX, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Samuel W. SMITH, Warden, Utah State Prison, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 13855.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Sept. 15, 1975.

*517Phil L. Hansen, Phil L. Hansen & Associates, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., William W. Barrett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Affirmed.

Nix pleaded guilty to a charge of issuing a bad check. The trial judge, on May 20, 1970, obviously in an effort to help and to extend this man a break, gave him six months in the county jail, and with three months he had already served, put him on probation, and gave him credit for *three more months*for good time (a highly unusual gratuity). Two weeks after this probationary gift, and on September 4th, at *defendant’s request,*he was permitted to go to Illinois, while still on probation, under the then existing Interstate Probation Act, Title 77-62-39 to 45, Utah Code Annotated, 1953. Three months later, on December 21, 1972, he was adjudged a probation violator and taken into custody. He was delivered to a custodian from Utah, whose credentials and authority were accepted, and to which no objection was made at that time or before the instant case. After a clerical error in sentence had been corrected, he was sentenced to the term applicable to the admitted worthless check charge.

Nix now says he was 1) denied his constitutional rights since the act was violated, to which contention we do not subscribe; 2) was denied due process for lack of hearing before being returned to Utah, to which we do not espouse, — warranting our conclusion perhaps on another Constitutional principle that you don’t look a gift horse in the mouth; 3) that he was unlawfully surrendered to the extraditing officer, which we cannot entertain for lack of proof; and 4) that he was sentenced twice for the same crime, which simply is not so, as is clearly reflected in the record.

Two other points on appeal, we feel, are impotent for lack of substance, and somewhat hypertechnical. We think the defendant may have erred in this case, but not the trial court.

ELLETT, CROCKETT, TUCKETT and MAUGHAN, JJ., concur.
#### Philip Brenner, Appellant-Respondent, *v.*Morton M. Schreck, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

January 23, 1959.

*946*Noah Seedman*for appellant-respondent.

*■Nathan L. Berke*for respondent-appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

Under the terms of the escrow agreement, the defendant undertook to procure an order from the Rent Commission increasing the maximum rent for the apartment in question. Implied in this agreement was a covenant on plaintiff’s part that he would deal fairly and act in good faith *(Price*v. *Spielman Motor Sales Co.,*261 App. Div. 626, 629; *Kirke La Shelle Co.*v. *Armstrong Co.,*263 N. Y. 79, 87). Since plaintiff, as the landlord, was the only person under the statute and regulations who could apply for such an order, and had refused to execute the necessary form, his conduct frustrated and prevented defendant’s performance. Under such circumstances defendant would be excused from performance (Williston, Contracts [Rev. ed., 1936], § *677; Patterson*v. *Meyerhofer,*204 N. Y. 96; *Watson & Co.*v. *Graves Elevator Co.,*202 App. Div. 10; Restatement, Contracts, § 295).

Defendant, however, is not entitled to summary judgment in the state of the pleadings (cf. *Curry*v. *Mackenzie,*239 N. Y. 267; *Ziegler*v. *Mancuso & Alessio, Inc.,*283 App. Div. 813).

The order, insofar as it denies plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, should be unanimously aErmed, without costs. Order, insofar as it denies defendant’s motion for summary judgment, modified by directing that the denial is without prejudice to a renewal thereof after service of an amended answer wherein defendant shall plead, as provided for by rule 92 of the Rules of Civil Practice, the conditions precedent which he claims plaintiff failed to perform; the amended answer is to be served within 10 days after entry of the order hereon.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Di Uiovanna, JJ.

Order aErmed, etc.
Exhibit 4(bo)


 


FORM OF


ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT


TO THE


ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION


OF


NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.


 


These Articles of Amendment to the Articles
of Incorporation, as amended, of NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) were adopted pursuant
to the authority of the Board of Directors of the Company pursuant to the Florida Business Corporation Act, Section 607.0602
and 607.0825, Florida Statutes, for the purpose of establishing and designating a series of its Serial Preferred Stock, $.01 par
value, before the issuance of any shares of that series and determining the preferences, limitations and relative rights of such
series and no shareholder action was required in accordance with Section 607.0602.


 


1.            The
name of the corporation is NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc.


 


2.            The
text of the amendment determining the terms of Series __ of the Company's Serial Preferred Stock, $.01 par value, is set forth
below:


 


(a)          The
new series of Preferred Stock established by this resolution is hereby designated “____________ Preferred Stock, Series
____”.


 


(b)          The
_____________ Preferred Stock, Series ____, is hereby authorized to be issued in the amount of _____ shares.


 


(c)          The
dividend rate of the _________ Preferred Stock, Series ____, shall be [dividend rate and/or method of calculation to be inserted].


 


(d)          [Redemption
provisions to be inserted.]


 


(e)          [Sinking
fund provisions, if any, and conversion privileges, if any, to be inserted.]


 


(f)           [Amounts
payable in the event of liquidation, dissolution or other winding up of the Company to be inserted.]


 


(g)          [Voting
rights, if any, to be inserted.]


 


(h)          [Other
terms, if any, to be inserted.]


 




     

     


    

 


3.            The
above amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company, pursuant to resolutions adopted on ____________ and,
in accordance with such resolutions and the duly-delegated authority of the Board of Directors, the approval of a senior executive
officer of the Company on ____________.


 


This, the ____ day of ____________, ____.


 


	NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.	 
	 	    	 
	By:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2385

JASON WESLEY HOYLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THEODORE MCENTIRE, Judge, in his official capacity; WILLIAM 

A. LEAVELL, III; ROBERT ALEXANDER BANNE LYERLY, Judge, in 

his official capacity; ROBERT G. HORNE, Judge, in his 

official capacity; GERALD W. WILSON, District Attorney, in 

his official capacity; MEREDITH R. ROBERTS, Assistant 

District Attorney, in her official capacity; KELSEY GRAFF, 

Attorney for Legal Aid of North Carolina Inc.; DENISE 

LOCKETT, Managing Attorney of Boone office of Legal Aid of 

North Carolina, Inc.; CELIA PISTOLIS, Assistant Director of 

Advocacy and Compliance for Legal Aid of North Carolina, 

Inc.; LEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA, INCORPORATED, by and 

through its Board of Directors; DANA CRAWFORD, Town of Boone 

Police Chief; WANDA SMITH, Communications/Records 

Supervisor, Town of Boone, in her official capacity; UNKNOWN 

DEFENDANT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00034-RLV-DSC)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Wesley Hoyle, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr.,

Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Dustin 

Timothy Greene, Clay Campbell Wheeler, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & 

STOCKTON, LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; William Carleton 

Metcalf, VAN WINKLE LAW FIRM, Asheville, North Carolina; Harry 

Lee Davis, Jr., Ann Cox Rowe, DAVIS & HAMRICK, LLP, WinstonSalem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Jason Wesley Hoyle appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Hoyle v. McEntire, No. 5:13-cv-00034-RLV-DSC (W.D.N.C. 

Nov. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 226 (Monday, November 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 82899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26040]



[[Page 82899]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Board of Scientific Counselors Infectious Diseases; (Formerly 
Known as the Board of Scientific Counselors, Deputy Director for 
Infectious Diseases); Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), within 
the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announces the 
renewal of the charter of the Board of Scientific Counselors Infectious 
Diseases (BSC ID); (formerly known as the Board of Scientific 
Counselors, Deputy Director for Infectious Diseases (BSC, DDID)).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Wiley, M.P.H., Designated 
Federal Officer, Board of Scientific Counselors Infectious Diseases, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and 
Human Services, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H16-5, Atlanta, Georgia 
30329-4027. Telephone: (404) 639-4840; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98cbcff1f4fde1d8fbfcfbb6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f7c7846434a566f4c4b4c01484059">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CDC is providing notice under 5 U.S.C. 1001-
1014 of the renewal of the charter of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors Infectious Diseases (formerly known as the Board of 
Scientific Counselors, Deputy Director for Infectious Diseases), 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and 
Human Services. This charter has been renewed for a two-year period 
through October 31, 2025.
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023-26040 Filed 11-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 82438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 24, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 17, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 23 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-65, CP2024-66.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-25901 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly
Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”),
I, John A Hardy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                              
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2012 |  | /s/ John A. Hardy                            
|                       |  | John A. Hardy
        Chief Executive Officer