alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01033701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/337 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/337

---

1.   Declaration concerning the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

Declaration concerning the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which has legally binding force, confirms the fundamental rights guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States.

The Charter does not extend the field of application of Union law beyond the powers of the Union or establish any new power or task for the Union, or modify powers and tasks as defined by the Treaties.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR<F1>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998<F1>
<CASH>                                          31,202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  594,943
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,099
<INVENTORY>                                    468,692
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,083,176
<PP&E>                                       1,658,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                 634,318
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,463,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          676,439
<BONDS>                                        754,849
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       320,707
<OTHER-SE>                                     345,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,463,895
<SALES>                                      4,336,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,336,120
<CGS>                                        3,692,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,692,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               399,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                195,264
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            160,164
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   160,164
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.67<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.65<F3>
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY'S FISCAL YEAR ENDS ON THE SATURDAY CLOSEST TO DECEMBER 31,
FISCAL YEAR 1997 ENDED JANUARY 3, 1998 AND INCLUDED 53 WEEKS.  THE
FIRST TWO QUARTERS OF 1997 HAD 12 WEEKS, THE THIRD QUARTER OF 1997
HAD 16 WEEKS AND THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 1997 HAD 13 WEEKS.
<F2>IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE", THIS ITEM REFLECTS
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE.
<F3>IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE", THIS ITEM REFLECTS
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1Judge Stephen A. Higginson is recused and did not

participate in this decision.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 09-41238

_____________________

In re: AMY UNKNOWN, 

Petitioner

Consolidated with

_____________________

No. 09-41254

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee

DOYLE RANDALL PAROLINE,

Defendant - Appellee

versus

AMY UNKNOWN, 

Movant - Appellant

__________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas, Tyler

__________________________

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion-Order December 21, 2009, 5 Cir., 2009, 591 F.3d 792)(09-41238 only)

(Revised Opinion-Order December 22, 2009, 5 Cir., 2009, 591 F.3d 792)

(Opinion March 22, 2011, 5 Cir., 2011, 636 F.3d 190)

Before JONES, Chief Judge, KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, GARZA, BENAVIDES,

STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES and

GRAVES, Circuit Judges.1

PER CURIAM:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for

rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular

active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en

banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk

will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 25, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
# C_2016202EN.01011601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/116 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/116

---

Article 155

(ex Article 139 TEC)

(ex Article 139 TEC)

1.   Should management and labour so desire, the dialogue between them at Union level may lead to contractual relations, including agreements.

2.   Agreements concluded at Union level shall be implemented either in accordance with the procedures and practices specific to management and labour and the Member States or, in matters covered by Article 153, at the joint request of the signatory parties, by a Council decision on a proposal from the Commission. The European Parliament shall be informed.

The Council shall act unanimously where the agreement in question contains one or more provisions relating to one of the areas for which unanimity is required pursuant to Article 153(2).

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 17, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 131589 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, CARL ROBINSON, as Personal Justices Representative of the Estate of DEBORAH LYNN ROBINSON, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131589 COA: 266294 Oakland CC: 2004-057806-NH KENNETH DALEN, M.D. and WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a sti pulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of th is application for le ave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISM ISSED with prejudice and without costs.

d1114 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 17, 2006

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 167 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 167

     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
committees of jurisdiction in the House of Representatives should craft 
replacement language for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
   that includes the amendments made to the Black Lung Benefits Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 2015

Mr. Jenkins of West Virginia (for himself, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Mooney of 
West Virginia, Mr. Griffith, and Mr. Rogers of Kentucky) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                           and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
committees of jurisdiction in the House of Representatives should craft 
replacement language for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
   that includes the amendments made to the Black Lung Benefits Act.

Whereas men and women who spend their lives mining coal deserve the black lung 
        benefits afforded them through the Black Lung Benefits Act;
Whereas these critical benefits are important for thousands of men and women 
        across the United States;
Whereas since 1969, black lung benefits have been guaranteed by the Federal 
        Government and have provided assistance for miners and their widows;
Whereas in 1981, the Black Lung Benefits Act was amended tightening eligibility 
        requirements and eliminating two provisions regarding coal miners' and 
        survivors' entitlement benefits;
Whereas the Black Lung Benefits Act was restored and amended into the Patient 
        Protection and Affordable Care Act, providing equity for certain 
        eligible survivors;
Whereas the House of Representatives passed a repeal of the Patient Protection 
        and Affordable Care Act on February 3, 2015, instructing committees of 
        jurisdiction to craft replacement language; and
Whereas current black lung benefits should not be reduced but should be 
        preserved and protected: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the committees of jurisdiction in the House of Representatives should 
craft replacement language for the Patient Protection and Affordable 
Care Act that includes the amendments that restored the Black Lung 
Benefits Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Two Park Avenue Company, Appellant, *v.*Intermediate Factors Corporation, Respondent, et al., Undertenants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 26, 1958.

*444
      *Demov & Morris (Eugene J. Morris, Matthew J. Bomber*and *Robert B. Levin*of counsel), for appellant.

*Gerald Orseck, Robert Orseck*and *Sidney Orseck*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal No. 47. The landlord’s affirmative case was admitted. There was no constructive eviction because the tenant did not quit the premises. There was no partial eviction because there was no deprivation of a substantial portion of the demised premises. The counterclaim for damages to tenant’s property is inadequately pleaded and the instructions to the jury did not make this phase of the case clear and were so bound up with issues that should not have been presented at all that the findings of the jury cannot be • considered as a determination of the facts. The counterclaim is dismissed without prejudice to a separate action for this relief or to pleading it as a counterclaim in the second action between the parties.

Appeal No. 45. While the granting of summary judgment might have been proper had the prior judgment been entered after a proper disposition, in view of the decision on the companion appeal herein this order cannot stand.

The final order and judgment in Appeal No. 47 should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in the petition, with costs. Counterclaim dismissed without prejudice.

*445The final order and judgment in Appeal No. 45 should be reversed, and motion for summary judgment denied, without costs.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Final order (Appeal No. 47) reversed, etc.

Final order (Appeal No. 45) reversed, etc.
EX-21

                   CENCOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT





Century Acceptance Corporation, 100% owned
The Company is in the process of dissolving Century's 
subsidiaries.  Although the following subsidiaries were inactive 
during 1996, they remain incorporated at December 31, 1996:



	Name							                               State of Incorporation

Century Finance Company of Colorado               Colorado
Century Finance Company of Missouri               Missouri
Century Finance Company of Omaha, Inc             Nebraska
Century Finance Company of Oklahoma, Inc.         Oklahoma
Century Finance Company of Tennessee              Tennessee
Century Acceptance Corporation of Texas           Texas
Century Finance Company of Utah                   Utah
JUT FLAKE 

I h.:! Hr, r :~t ... !) r'-~1\! ~ r:-1~\! fH :·~l 11 JIV. :-':;· 

Clli\P\~if !lL Or'\1 [if[ 1\l!nCil'f'i'f 

~--0~/M>il! t (lr'-~ J\t. 1INi, 

The Honorable Gina McCarthy 

Administrator 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania /\venue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Administrator McCarthy, 

United .5tatcs ~rnJtc 

May 12,2014 

• ••' rJJ,, lr:.• r 

i l'" '"r.,H , ,•J•rt. ·j l, 

•'•'' · -.i· :44-r fi 

I appreciate your efforts to facilitate the November 20, 2013 exceptional events rulcmaking listening session 

with Arizona stakeholders. Unfortunately, I was disappointed to learn that the Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) plans to delay the rulcmaking process- both because of the pressing need for a rulemaking and 

from learning of the delay via press reports. 

A draft rule was expected by late 2013 or curly 2014. While the proposed rule is reportedly ncar completion and 

ready tor review by the White House. it is my understanding that the release has now been delayed until2015. 

Initial reports indicate that the delay is due to agency resource constraints. Given the agency's regulatory zeal in 

recent years, I would suggest that a higher priority should be the resources that the current approach to 

exceptional events saps from limited state budgets. In 2011 and 20 I 2, Arizona was forced to submit a total of 

I 8 exceptional event demonstrations. Though ultimately approved, the combined estimated cost of proving to 

EPA that the state should not be held responsible for air quality exceedances it had no way of controlling was 

$675,000 and 790 stan:.hours. · 

Additionally, there appears to be some thought that the immediate urgency for the rulemaking for exceptional 

events is diminished because the agency will not be proposing National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

nonattainmcnt areas designations for several years. Even if accurate, this belies the potential for how long a 

rulemaking such as this can ultimately take to complete, and the necessity for established regulatory rules of the 

road, and the required planning time for state and local air quality agencies faced with exceptional events. 

Unfortunately, this lli.!W delay prolongs a process that is notorious for its cost, complexity, opaqueness, and 

uncertainty. While I continue to evaluate legislative options, EPA needs to move forward with a rulemaking in 

an expeditious manner that maximizes transparency and predictability and minimizes the unnecessary 

regulatory and cost burdens for the states, tribes, and local governments. 

Toward that end, l request an accurate' and up-to-date timetable for the exceptional events rulemaking including 

when the agency anticipates noticing the proposed rule and seck your assurances that the rulemaking process 

will not be subject to further delays. I appreciate your prompt attention to this request. in strict accordance with 

agency rules, regulations, and ethil:al guidelines, and would appreciate a written response to these concerns.
Crop CaliforniaSoutheast Other Total CaliforniaSoutheast Other Total CaliforniaSoutheast Other Total

Commodities 5,000 0 0 5,000 2,419 0 0 2,419 822 0 0 822 NPMA food processing structures 0 0 17,365 17,365 0 0 200 200 0 0 0 0 Mills and processors 0 0 135,299135,299 0 0 74,510 74,510 0 0 25,334 25,334 Dried Cured Pork 0 0 3,730 3,730 0 3,730 0 3,730 0 3,730 0 3,730 Total Post Harvest 5,000 0156,394 161,394 2,419 3,730 74,710 80,859 822 3,730 25,334 29,886 Cucurbits 0 195,698 0195,698 0 59,500 0 59,500 0 3,886 0 3,886 Eggplant - field 0 19,725 0 19,725 0 6,904 0 6,904 0 1,381 0 1,381 Forest nursery 0 0 93,547 93,547 0 0 34,230 34,230 0 0 0 0 Nursery stock - fruit, nut, flower 7,955 0 0 7,955 1,591 0 0 1,591 476 0 0 476 Orchard replant 183,232 0 0183,232 18,324 0 0 18,324 6,230 0 0 6,230 Ornamentals 52,167 12,140 0 64,307 46,950 1,214 0 48,164 39,907 911 0 40,818 Peppers - field 0 206,234 0206,234 0 28,366 0 28,366 0 5,604 0 5,604 Strawberry - field 751,596 61,113 0812,709 673,085 4,919 0678,004 461,186 0 0461,186 Strawberry runners 4,690 1,346 0 6,036 3,752 0 0 3,752 3,752 0 0 3,752 Tomatoes - field 0 292,751 0292,751 0 54,423 0 54,423 0 9,107 0 9,107 Sweet potato slips 11,612 0 0 11,612 8,709 0 0 8,709 0 0 0 0 Total Pre-Plant 1,011,252 789,007 93,5471,893,806 752,411 155,326 34,230941,967511,551 20,889 0532,440 Total Use Limit 1,016,252 789,007249,9412,055,200 754,830159,056108,9401,022,826512,373 24,619 25,334562,326 Geographic Distribution (total) 49% 38% 12% 74% 16% 11% 91% 4% 5% Decision XXIII/4 (2013) Critical Use Authorizations (kg) by Geography Decision XXI/11 (2011) Decision XXII/6 (2012)
RE: E.O. 12866 NESHAP for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers;

2060-AR14

Mary Johnson to

:

Higgins, Cortney 12/17/2012 01:20 PM 

Cc

:

RobertJ Wayland, Thomas Gillis, Jonathan Averback

From: Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,

Jonathan Averback/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

EO 12866 NESHAP for Area Sources ICI Boilers 2060-AR14_121712.docx 

Cortney,

Attached is the current version of the NESHAP for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and 

Institutional Boilers - Final rule; notice of final action on reconsideration.

Thanks.

Mary

Mary Johnson

Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Mail Code D 243-01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-5025

Fax: (919) 541-5450

-----"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> wrote: -----

To: Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 12/17/2012 11:20AM

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: RE: E.O. 12866 NESHAP for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and 

Institutional Boilers; 2060-AR14

Hi Mary,

Is there a more recent version that the draft sent with this email? If so, can you send it to me?

Thanks,
Cortney

From: Mary Johnson [mailto:Johnson.Mary@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 3:02 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Peter Tsirigotis; RobertJ Wayland; Jonathan Averback; Thomas Gillis; Jim Eddinger

Subject: E.O. 12866 NESHAP for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers; 2060-

AR14

Cortney,

Attached is the NESHAP for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Final rule; 

notice of final action on reconsideration, per your request as part of the E.O. 12866 interagency review 

process. Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thank you.

(See attached file: EO 12866 NESHAP for Area Sources ICI Boilers 2060-

AR14_092112.docx)

Mary Johnson

Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Mail Code D 243-01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-5025

Fax: (919) 541-5450
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned officer of AutoImmune Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies
that, as of the date of this statement, the Company's quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company as of and
for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2002.

   The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sabarnes-Oxley Act of 2002. This statement is not "filed" for the purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that Act or any other federal or state law or regulation.

   Date:  November 14, 2002                /s/ Robert C. Bishop
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Name: Robert C. Bishop
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer
June 30, 1998

20579

#### Corbett v. State

Affirmed
**OFF.ICe OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSllN**  **aRO ”**  **CR SLLLLllL**  ***~ommcr**

**..zrnrlt.h**

## IJ 1 ’ . -’ , .: . ‘. 8

"SOOti 1. (8). Fh. tW'm 

### 'bsQLn@ l U8 0 4

in t hh A c t r h a ll m o a n 

### rttro8r#* 

### 6inoo l **8tUdiO** 

## ooushOr rOf0 

### hod 

## ir dsd#Iod Tnmtln@ ml8 r~tlrhrto?ll~amwar tour lnqulry, 80 ma Youlm TOW fluly AmOmfrrO!msRkLO?Tl5AS

, i ! 1 . \ _, I**i** ., ~. d
# Page 1-4

&"Times New Roman,Regular"For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Divison 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"August 5, 2019     Version 2.0

# MGAP Production Checklist

&"Times New Roman,Regular"For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, SCI, Audit Services Branch		&"Times New Roman,Regular"August 5, 2019     Version 2.0

# Audit Scoresheet

&"Times New Roman,Regular"For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, SCI, Audit Services Branch		&"Times New Roman,Regular"August 5, 2019     Version 2.0
http://www.ams.usda.gov/gapghp

# CAR Duplication Instructions

&"Times New Roman,Regular"For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, SCI, Audit Services Branch		&"Times New Roman,Regular"August 5, 2019     Version 2.0

# Corrective Action Report

&"Times New Roman,Regular"For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, SCI, Audit Services Branch		&"Times New Roman,Regular"August 5, 2019     Version 2.0

# General Questions

&"Times New Roman,Regular"For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, SCI, Audit Services Branch		&"Times New Roman,Regular"August 5, 2019     Version 2.0

# Part 3 - House Packing Facility

&"Times New Roman,Regular"For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, SCI, Audit Services Branch		&"Times New Roman,Regular"August 5, 2019     Version 2.0

# Part 4 - Storage&Transportation

&"Times New Roman,Regular"For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, SCI, Audit Services Branch		&"Times New Roman,Regular"August 5, 2019     Version 2.0

# Part 7- Preventive Food Defense

&"Times New Roman,Regular"For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, SCI, Audit Services Branch		&"Times New Roman,Regular"August 5, 2019     Version 2.0

# USDA Logo Use Addendum

&"Times New Roman,Regular"For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, SCI, Audit Services Branch		&"Times New Roman,Regular"August 5, 2019     Version 2.0

# image1.jpeg

# image2.jpeg

# image3.jpeg
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

1.   Declaration concerning the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

Declaration concerning the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which has legally binding force, confirms the fundamental rights guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States.

The Charter does not extend the field of application of Union law beyond the powers of the Union or establish any new power or task for the Union, or modify powers and tasks as defined by the Treaties.

---