alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Organic Integrity Dashboard – 6/30/2022

A quarterly review of National Organic Program (NOP) Enforcement activities

Investigations & Inquiries by Fiscal Year

 USDA begins a new phase of oversight with organic farms & businesses in India 

In January 2021, USDA announced it was ending its organic recognition agreement in India. This change was made to

adapt to the evolution of organic supply chains over time and allows USDA to better protect farms and businesses

certified to the USDA organic regulations around the world. With that announcement, operations were given 18 months

to transition to a USDA-accredited organic certifier. As of July 12, 2022, all organic operations in India must be certified

under the USDA organic regulations by a USDA-accredited certifier to export to the United States. More than 1,100

organic businesses in India successfully achieved USDA organic certification during the transition. 

Over the past 18 months, the NOP has taken action to protect the organic market, issuing directives to certifiers in 

India to assess their accreditation capabilities and to require additional sampling, testing and trace-back audits. We have

taken enforcement action against those selling unverified product as organic. We have monitored imports, conducted 

surveillance activities based on market risks, and held regular calls with USDA certifiers working in the region to verify

requirements and assess certification progress during the transition period.

As we enter this new phase of trade with organic farms and businesses in India, the National Organic Program

continues to support legitimate trade, while also protecting the integrity of the USDA organic label for our certified

businesses and consumers around the world.

Learn more about the National Organic Program:

www.ams.usda.gov/Organic

NOTES: Open cases are based on allegations, complaints, and surveillance, and are not in themselves proof of wrongdoing.

Administrative Actions are warnings/notices to businesses, often uncertified, and are critical in establishing that violators are aware 

of the rules, to support future enforcement action if needed.

476 Cases in Progress

As of 6/30/2022

270 Closed Cases by Outcome

12 Months ending 6/30/2022

USDA is an equal opportunity, employer, provider, and lender.
# C_2016202EN.01008701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/87 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/87

---

Article 99

(ex Article 79 TEC)

(ex Article 79 TEC)

An Advisory Committee consisting of experts designated by the governments of Member States shall be attached to the Commission. The Commission, whenever it considers it desirable, shall consult the Committee on transport matters.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1545 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1545

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion of 
certain fringe benefit expenses for which a deduction is disallowed in 
                   unrelated business taxable income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2019

 Mr. Walker (for himself, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Gaetz, 
 Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Suozzi, and Mr. Budd) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion of 
certain fringe benefit expenses for which a deduction is disallowed in 
                   unrelated business taxable income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF INCLUSION OF CERTAIN FRINGE BENEFIT EXPENSES IN 
              UNRELATED BUSINESS TAXABLE INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Section 512(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking paragraph (7).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the amendments made by section 13703 of Public 
Law 115-97.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 333-79547) of Bridgford Foods Corporation of our report dated January 27,2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in theAnnual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Amended AnnualReport on Form 10-K/A. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of ourreport dated January 27, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statementschedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.
| **/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|
| **Orange  County, California**     |
| **March 22,  2007**                |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe have issued our report dated February 20, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements in the Annual Report of Camco Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in theRegistration Statements of Camco Financial Corporation on Forms S-8, File No. 333-94113, effectiveJanuary 5, 2000 and File Nos. 333-90142, 333-90152, 333-90158 and 333-90166 effective June 10,2002.       /s/ PLANTE & MORAN PLLC  Auburn Hills, Michigan
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1115 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1115

  To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to remove the exclusion of 
pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from the definition of consumer 
 product in order to permit the issuance of safety standards for such 
          articles by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2019

  Ms. Kelly of Illinois (for herself, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Yarmuth, Ms. 
 Norton, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Cohen, Ms. 
Jackson Lee, Ms. Plaskett, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Ms. Brownley of 
  California, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Cicilline, and Mr. 
   Moulton) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to remove the exclusion of 
pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from the definition of consumer 
 product in order to permit the issuance of safety standards for such 
          articles by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Firearm Safety Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF EXCLUSION OF FIREARMS FROM THE DEFINITION OF 
              CONSUMER PRODUCT.

    Section 3(a)(5) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 
2052(a)(5)) is amended by striking subparagraph (E) and redesignating 
subparagraphs (F) through (I) as subparagraphs (E) through (H), 
respectively.
                                 <all>
```
# m<w5 FILE COPY



### COA# 08-13-00025-CR 

### OFFENSE: OTHER CRIMINAL 

### STYLE: ExParte: Daniel Alvarez v. COUNTY: El Paso COA DISPOSITION: GRANTED 

### TRIAL COURT: 384th DistrictCourt DATE: 01/04/13 Publish: YES TC CASE #: 960D10169-384-1



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD STYLE: Ex Parte: Daniel Alvarez v. CCA#: 

## APpE.LL.EE A Petition CCADisposition: FORDISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE: 

# fie/hfet/ JUDGE: 

# •OT-4T DATE: .5W. JC. 2&/S' JUDGE: /^ SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE:
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART THREE

PERMANENT PROVISIONS

PERMANENT PROVISIONS

Article 17

The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, may make the adaptations to the provisions of this Act relating to the common agricultural policy which may prove necessary as a result of a modification in Union rules.

---
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                           <C>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996                 DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           JUL-01-1996                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1996                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                        10,533                       2,027
<SECURITIES>                                   6,758                       2,612
<RECEIVABLES>                                    870                         527
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (77)                          77
<INVENTORY>                                        0                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              21,105                      10,154
<PP&E>                                        39,362                      39,291
<DEPRECIATION>                              (21,967)                    (22,092)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                38,694                      27,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         14,793                       6,211
<BONDS>                                            0                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0                           0
<PREFERRED>                                        0                           0
<COMMON>                                         116                         116
<OTHER-SE>                                    23,785                      21,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  38,694                      27,349
<SALES>                                        2,205                       3,038
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              41,774                      53,932
<CGS>                                            729                         926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 38,675                      54,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (501)                       (501)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     260                         260
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (761)                       (761)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0                           0
<CHANGES>                                          0                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (761)                       (761)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.13)                       (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.13)                       (.13)


</TABLE>
Rel: June 7, 2024

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT

OCTOBER TERM, 2023-2024

SC-2024-0071

Lhaj Lru Quwon El v. Larry Marsili (Appeal from Madison Circuit Court: 

CV-23-76).

WISE, Justice.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P.

Parker, C.J., and Sellers, Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-19-0000631

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN THE INTEREST OF SM 

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(FC-S NO. 19-00051)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Chan and Hiraoka, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Mother-Appellant LM's

September 9, 2020 Motion to Dismiss Appeal, the papers in

support, and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted and the

appeal is dismissed, under Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure

Rule 42(b).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 17, 2020.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Associate Judge 

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000631

17-SEP-2020

08:49 AM
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

DOUGLAS BRUCE-JOHN GOGEL,

Appellant,

and

BREANNA JOANN BYRD, and each of

them,

Defendant.

No. 71427-9-1

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

APR 2 0 2015

FILED:

Trickey, J. —Douglas Bruce-John Gogel appeals from the judgment and

sentence entered following his conviction for prescription forgery. The State

concedes that, pursuant to RCW 69.41.072, it erroneously charged Gogel under

RCW 69.41.020(1 )(b) of the legend drug act when it should have charged the

crime of prescription forgery under RCW 69.50.403(1 )(c) of the Uniform Controlled

Substances Act. We accept the State's concession, reverse the conviction, and

remand to permit the trial court to enter an agreed order of dismissal with prejudice

pursuant to RAP 7.2(e).

WE CONCUR:

f\ ^k 0. Hf^ 1

t

C3

sm *::> ~:

=s

ZX'J i'~> TM

ro Tj

o ~T-"£'.'

""^ —£-

"•—••- t s- *"

—-vs.

CO "73 CO

-C" ... _, —.> &&, <r-
USDA FARM TO SCHOOL UPDATE

FARM

TO

SCHOOL
USDA FARM TO SCHOOL UPDATE

 The USDA Team made 15 site visits in 2010. These 

visits represented nine areas of the U.S. with varied 

demographics and Farm to School characteristics.
USDA FARM TO SCHOOL UPDATE

 The Team drafted summaries for each of the 15 

Farm to School site visits conducted last year.

 These summaries provide the highlights of the 

Team’s visits and are being added to USDA’s Farm 

to School web site.
USDA FARM TO SCHOOL UPDATE

Summary 

Report

 A full summary report is begin compiled 

and will include:

 Lessons learned;

 Best practices;

 Tips, common barriers, and possible 

solutions.

 The full report will be added to USDA’s 

Farm to School website in the spring of 

2011.
Other Updates
Know Your Farmer/Know Your Food

BLOG  The Know Your Farmer/Know Your Food 

blog is a great way to stay up to date 

on the initiative.

 New blogs are posted several times a 

week and include a wide variety of 

topics.

 You can access the blog through the Ideas 

and Stories tab on the Know Your Farmer 

Know Your Food website: 

www.usda.gov/knowyourfarmer
Know Your Farmer/Know Your Food

College Tours  Deputy Secretary Kathleen 

Merrigan is conducting college tours 

to promote the initiative.

 The first stops were at N.C. A & T 

University and at N.C. State University

 Check the USDA website for future tour 

stops
Question?
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

C.   DECLARATIONS BY MEMBER STATES

DECLARATIONS BY MEMBER STATES

51.   Declaration by the Kingdom of Belgium on national Parliaments

Declaration by the Kingdom of Belgium on national Parliaments

Belgium wishes to make clear that, in accordance with its constitutional law, not only the Chamber of Representatives and Senate of the Federal Parliament but also the parliamentary assemblies of the Communities and the Regions act, in terms of the competences exercised by the Union, as components of the national parliamentary system or chambers of the national Parliament.

---
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### August 23, 2012 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT
ALEX HUAQIANG LEO, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF KANSAS; KATHRYN H. VRATIL, Chief Judge; J. THOMAS MARTEN, U.S. District Judge, Defendants - Appellees. No. 12-3100 (D.C. No. 2:12-CV-02168-CM-JPO) (D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before KELLY , TYMKOVICH , and GORSUCH , Circuit Judges. **
Plaintiff-Appellant Alex HuaQiang Leo appeals the dismissal of his complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The district court determined that Mr. Leo continues to

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.challenge orders in other federal cases concerning his discrimination claims against Garmin International. SeeLeo v. Garmin Int’l, Inc. , 431 F. App’x. 702 (10th Cir. 2011) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Garmin on age and race discrimination claims); Leo v. Garmin Int’l, Inc. , 464 F. App’x. 737 (10th Cir. 2012) (affirming dismissal of second suit as barred by res judicata and denial of post-judgment motions); Leo v. Garmin Int’l, Inc. , 464 F. App’x. 740 (10th Cir. 2012) (affirming denial of Rule 60(b) motion); Leo v. Garmin Int’l, Inc. , 464 F. App’x. 744 (10th Cir. 2012) (affirming denial of post-judgment motions and remanding for district court to determine reasonable attorney’s fees as a sanction). We agree with the district court’s disposition; Mr. Leo’s amended complaint is an improper and repetitive attack on prior district court rulings, when in fact our holdings are the law of the case, McWilliams v. Colorado , 121 F.3d 573, 574 (10th Cir. 1997), and the judicial defendants are protected by absolute judicial immunity, Hunt v. Bennett , 17 F.3d 1263, 1266 (10th Cir. 1994). AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge

- 2 -
ne ostice Court of Appeals

JOSH R. Morriss, III Sixth Appellate District

JUSTICES State of Texas
BAILEY C. MOSELEY .
RALPH K. BURGESS

April 17, 2015

Tony Crayton
TDCJ-ID#1969687
1100 FM 655

Ramsey Unit

Rosharon, Texas 77583

In Re: Tony Crayton v. State of Texas
Cause No: 06-14-00208-CR.

In response to your recent correspondence to the Court:

CLERK
DEBRA K. AUTREY

BI-STATE JUSTICE BUILDING
100 NORTH STATE LINE AVENUE #20
‘TEXARKANA, TEXAS 75501
903/798-3046

1@) This case has not been filed in this Court of Appeals as of this date.

O Your case was filed in this Court on

QO. The date of submission of your case to the Court is not presently known.

r@) Your case is set for oral argument on

(x) Appellant’s brief is due April 27, 2015. We are forwarding your letter to Mr. Braddy.

Clerk’s Office

Cc: Martin Braddy


ear Mr, Worriss I, Mes hoo Herel (2015—

rene 18 “Tou Gnyloo $y se 06-M-00908-CR wirole

ypu Clerk Mrs, tlutre Aheal my Cage £m, 4} ‘amor, LA,
Rud XT hawt rot wh Prom Von ot all vue Aa % Hood
PP you al/ are ttting the things deeded od my case, 7 fh =
Cot Don't Wear Dron Wr, thers boffero do & by setts s
ex tent on om aipeu) appellate, 2 the rales, LSA Se
Kiowa ow Whe where ZF stood or what do T weelo do myse/fe on)
oats More help. — beos ny Aterne- 955 wot yepersent’ ure Pry ye,
Case Bo woul) Need to oet aptte- ene x sheaf. a

Surely

TRECEIVED IN
Sith wisi TF (PAY Hin,
APR 17 2015

Texarkana, Texas
Debra Autrey, Clerk
# C_2016202EN.01017501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/175 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/175

---

Article 296

(ex Article 253 TEC)

(ex Article 253 TEC)

Where the Treaties do not specify the type of act to be adopted, the institutions shall select it on a case-by-case basis, in compliance with the applicable procedures and with the principle of proportionality.

Legal acts shall state the reasons on which they are based and shall refer to any proposals, initiatives, recommendations, requests or opinions required by the Treaties.

When considering draft legislative acts, the European Parliament and the Council shall refrain from adopting acts not provided for by the relevant legislative procedure in the area in question.

---