alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,230,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,892,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,126,000
<PP&E>                                         160,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (160,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,126,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   118,074,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (108,118,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,126,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  334,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (180,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Rome Sentinel Company, Respondent, v City of Rome et al., Appellants.

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner sought disclosure, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), of a report of the City of Rome Water Department that consisted of an internal review *1006of that agency. FOIL embodies a broad standard of disclosure of government agency documents, which are presumptively available to public inspection and copying unless the agency can show that they are exempt from disclosure *(see,*Public Officers Law § 84; *Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. v Burns,*67 NY2d 562, 565-566; *Matter of Buffalo News v Buffalo Mun. Hous. Auth.,*163 AD2d 830; *see also, Matter of Prisoners’ Legal Servs. v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.,*73 NY2d 26, 30). Intra-agency documents are exempt from disclosure under FOIL so as "to protect the deliberative process of the government by ensuring that persons in an advisory role [are] able to express their opinions freely to agency decision makers” *(Matter of Sea Crest Constr. Corp. v Stubing,*82 AD2d 546, 549; *see,*Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [g]; *Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster,*65 NY2d 131, 132; *Kheel v Ravitch,*93 AD2d 422, 427-428, *affd*62 NY2d 1; *Ingram v Axelrod,*90 AD2d 568, 569).

We have conducted an in camera review of the subject report and find that the report does not contain statistical or factual tabulations or data, instructions to staff that affect the public or final agency policies or determinations. It consists solely of opinions, advice, evaluations, recommendations and other subjective material and is therefore exempt from disclosure *(see,*Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [g]; *Matter of Miracle Mile Assocs. v Yudelson,*68 AD2d 176, *lv denied*48 NY2d 606, 706; *see also, Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, supra; Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v Williams,*134 AD2d 267).

In view of our conclusion, we do not reach respondents’ contention that the report is exempt from disclosure because it is an unwarranted invasion of privacy *(see,*Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [b]; § 89 [2] [b] [v]). In addition, because respondent Water Department had a reasonable basis for withholding the report, petitioner is not entitled to attorney’s fees or disbursements *(see, Matter of Hopkins v City of Buffalo,*107 AD2d 1028; *Matter of Niagara Envtl. Action v City of Niagara Falls,*100 AD2d 742, *affd*63 NY2d 651). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J.—Article 78.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Lowery, JJ. *[See,*145 Misc 2d 183.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      13,204,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              140,628,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                41,494,000
<INVENTORY>                                 18,007,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           152,887,000
<PP&E>                                     170,416,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              96,547,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             526,853,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       49,604,000
<BONDS>                                    326,413,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       151,000      
<OTHER-SE>                                 151,110,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               526,853,000
<SALES>                                     42,860,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            91,238,000
<CGS>                                       22,719,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,719,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            73,945,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             4,410,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,211,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,426,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   150,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,576,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,576,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.37)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from the Utah Inland Port Authority (WB23-58—11/1/23) for permission to use select data from the Board's annual 2021 masked Carload Waybill Sample. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Board's website under docket no. WB23-58.

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.

*Contact:*                     Alexander Dusenberry, (202) 245-0319.                

Kenyatta Clay,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2023-26055 Filed 11-24-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
| Name      of Subsidiary                                    |   | State in which Incorporated |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
| Bridgford      Marketing Company                           |   | California                                 |
| Bridgford      Meat Company                                |   | California                                 |
| Bridgford      Food Processing Corporation                 |   | California                                 |
| Bridgford      Food Processing of Texas, L.P.**            |   | Texas                                      |
| A.S.I.      Corporation                                    |   | California                                 |
| Bridgford      Distributing Company of Delaware (inactive) |   | Delaware                                   |
| American      Ham Processors, Inc.*                   |   | Delaware                                   |
| Bert      Packing Company (inactive)                       |   | Illinois                                   |
| Moriarty      Meat Company (inactive)                      |   | Illinois                                   |
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 24, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00013

- CV

Judy FREEMAN,

Appellant

v.

Kundu JOHNSON, individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of James Phillip

Johnson, deceased,

Appellees

From the 225th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- CI

- 13953

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant's motion for extension of time to file a brief is granted. We order appellant's brief

due July 6 , 2021.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of June, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                         Page 30

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, Michael O. Moore, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of The Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this
Certification:

1.  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
February 1, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 19, 1004



                                        /s/  Michael O. Moore
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael O. Moore
                                        Executive Vice President
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
50 6th Judicial District Court 

Albert M. McCaig, Jr., Judge 

www .Court506.com 

June 8, 2015 

Court of Criminal Appeals 

P .0. Box 12308 

Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas 78711 

RECEiVED IN C~URT CF CRIP.1!NA1 A~PEALS 

JUN lO 2015 

Court Coordinator 

Susie Schubert 

Court Reporter 

Robyn S. Wiley 

Grimes County 

Waller County 

836 Austin Street, Suite 307 

Hempstead, Texas 77445 

Fax: 979.826.9149 

Ofc: 979.921.0921 

Re: Writs Number 08-09-12976E through 08-09-12986E 

Criminal Trial Court Number 08-09-1297 6 through 08-09-12986 

Ex Parte 

William Andrew Allen 

Clerk: 

I am the trial court judge in the referenced matter. This is my second letter to the Court 

on this subject. The Applicant's cases were originally heard by the 155th Judicial District 

Court. By Legislative act (Section 24.254, Government Code), effective January 1, 2014, the 

506th Judicial District Court took over all cases pending in the 155th Judicial District Court. 

The Applicant, Mr. William Andrew Allen, has made numerous filings with the trial 

court pertaining to his 11.07 Writ applications,· many of which have had to do with his 

contention that the 506th court does not have jurisdiction of his cases. 

Mr. Allen's frequent and continuous supplementation and filings has required both 

this court and the Waller County District Clerk, to provide eleven separate supplements to 

the several 11.07 Applications each time Mr. Ailen files new ailegations. This has become 

labor and resource intensive, consumes valuable time, and, to date, does not appear to have 

provided any substantial new information to your court. He is on his fifth filing on each of 

the eleven cases. 

I am requesting the Honorable Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to declare Mr. 

William Andrew Allen a vexatious litigant, and to deny him further access to the courts until 

his current applications for 11.07 relief have been ruled on by your court . 

AMMI 

c: Waller County District Clerk 

Mr. William Andrew Allen 

. ~/if~ 

/~~~~!-~·McCAIG, . Judge, Presiding 

Mr. Elton Mathis, Waller County District Attorney 

'""
# C_2016202EN.01004401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/44

---

Article 53

(ex Article 51 TEU)

(ex Article 51 TEU)

This Treaty is concluded for an unlimited period.

---
EXHIBIT 21


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

The following is a list of the active subsidiaries of the Company showing the
jurisdiction of incorporation and the percentage of voting securities owned by
the Company or by wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company as of March 31, 2001.

                                              JURISDICTION       PERCENTAGE
                                                   OF            OF VOTING
NAME OF CORPORATION                           INCORPORATION      SECURITIES
-------------------                           -------------      ----------
Barbara Gould S.A.                            France                100%
Carter-Wallace, N.S. Inc.                     Delaware              100%
Carter-Wallace, O.S. Inc.                     Delaware              100%
Carter-Wallace Limited                        England               100%
Carter-Wallace (Australia) Pty, Limited       Australia             100%
Carter-Wallace, S.A.                          Mexico                100%
Carter-Wallace FSC Corp.                      Virgin Islands        100%
Carter-Horner Inc.                            Canada                100%
Icart, S.A.                                   Spain                 100%
International Biological Laboratories, Inc.   Maryland               95%
Laboratoires Fumouze, S.A.                    France                100%
Sante Beaute S.A.                             France                100%
Sofibel S.A.R.L.                              France                100%
S.p.A. Italiana Laboratori Bouty              Italy                 100%
Technogenetics S.r.l.                         Italy                 100%
Tripharma S.A.R.L.                            France                100%


All of the above subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial
statements of the Company.
**Exhibit 23.4**

 

 

February 19,2009

 

NexenInc.

8017th Avenue SW

Calgary,Alberta  T2P 3P7

 

Boardof Directors:

 

Wehereby consent to references to McDaniel and Associates Consultants Ltd.relating to the evaluation of certain oil and gas properties of Nexen Inc. (the“Company”) and audit of the Company’s interest in Syncrude, contained in thesection entitled “Basis of Reserves Estimates” within “Reserves, Production andRelated Information” as set out in Part I, Items 1&2 Business andProperties of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2008.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

**McDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.**

 

 
| “signed  by P. A. Welch” |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |
| P.A.  Welch, P.Eng.                |
| President  and Managing Director   |

 

 

CalgaryAlberta

February 19,2009

 

2200, Bow Valley Square 3, 255 - 5 Avenue SW, Calgary AB T2P 3G6  Tel: (403) 262-5506  Fax: (403) 233-2744  www.mcdan.com

 

----
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-79,465-01

EX PARTE AL LETROY SMITH, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FROM CAUSE NO. 43,986-A IN THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT

POTTER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). After filing and setting Applicant’s

application, this Court held that a court may sua sponte consider whether laches should bar an

applicant’s claim. Ex parte Smith, ___ S.W.3d ___, No. WR-79,465-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 1,

2014). Because this Court held that equity requires giving Smith an opportunity to explain his delay

and the current record was silent on the circumstances that may excuse his delay, Smith’s application

was remanded to the habeas court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law consistent with

the Smith opinion. This Court further requested the habeas court to supplement the record with any
2

affidavits, interrogatories, documents, and transcripts.

On February 2, 2015, this Court received the habeas judge’s supplemental findings of fact

and conclusions of law. Among the judge’s other mainly historical findings, the judge found that,

“As explanation for the 10 1⁄2 year delayfrom conviction to the habeas application, applicant, through

newly-appointed counsel, points only to his misplaced reliance ‘on the care and vigilance’ of former

appellate counsel Wilson.” The habeas judge concluded that Applicant’s delay “did not result from

justifiable excuse or excusable neglect” and recommended that relief be denied.

Because the record was not supplemented beyond the bare findings and conclusions, we

cannot conclude that the judge’s findings and conclusions are supported by the record. Although the

judge’s findings indicate that Applicant was given some sort of opportunity to respond, the record

is silent as to the nature of this opportunity and lacks any substantive evidence of it. A supplemental

transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes

from any hearing or deposition, shall be returned to this Court within 30 days of the date of this

order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: April 15, 2015

Do not publish
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*RICHARD E. SMITH

(AC 19978)

Schaller, Hennessy and Daly, Js.

Argued May 9

officially released June 6, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
# C_2016202EN.01019701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/197 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/197

---

Article 353

Article 48(7) of the Treaty on European Union shall not apply to the following Articles:

| — | Article 311, third and fourth paragraphs, |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 311, third and fourth paragraphs,

| — | Article 312(2), first subparagraph, |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 312(2), first subparagraph,

| — | Article 352, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 352, and

| — | Article 354. |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 354.

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U. S.
      C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Report of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Jeremy Barbera,
      as
      Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
                and





2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Dated:
              October 29, 2007
            By:
            /s/ J.
              Jeremy
              BarberaJ.
              Jeremy BarberaChairman of the Board and Chief Executive
              Officer(Principal Executive
              Officer)




This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-KSB/A pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
      by
      such Act, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE I

DIGNITY

DIGNITY

Article 4

Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

---
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

40.   Declaration on Article 329 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 329 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference declares that Member States may indicate, when they make a request to establish enhanced cooperation, if they intend already at that stage to make use of Article 333 providing for the extension of qualified majority voting or to have recourse to the ordinary legislative procedure.

---