alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA
- 2011
- 0385 SNPRM **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010
-NM
- 256
- AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.
Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA
- IR
- M
- 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

**For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:

**ASE Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains restated summary financial information extracted from
the balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained earnings and
statement of cash flows contained in Form 10-K of Canal Electric Company for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000016906
<NAME> CANAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          265,700
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          3,802
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              21,532
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            25,070
<OTHER-ASSETS>                      13,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     329,948
<COMMON>                            38,080
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>            8,321
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 51,647
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      98,048
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                87,713
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  20,675
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>        1,110
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>         13,258
<LEASES-CURRENT>                       586
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     108,558
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      329,948
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          197,820
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 8,390
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         166,232
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         174,622
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             23,198
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     703
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      23,901
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             9,743
<NET-INCOME>                        14,158
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>       14,158
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            10,662
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            8,283
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              36,512
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0



</TABLE>
#### Joseph M. STEVENS, Appellant, v. Burwell G. SHEPARD.

No. 11617.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1939.

*1022George Reinhardt, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

Charles M. Miller, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed at costs of appellant, per stipulation of parties.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Goody's Family Clothing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 29, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
R. Carlin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ Edward R. Carlin

Edward R. Carlin
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
November 22, 2005
# C_2016202EN.01004301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/43

---

Article 50

1.   Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.

2.   A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council, acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.

3.   The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.

4.   For the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 3, the member of the European Council or of the Council representing the withdrawing Member State shall not participate in the discussions of the European Council or Council or in decisions concerning it.

A qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

5.   If a State which has withdrawn from the Union asks to rejoin, its request shall be subject to the procedure referred to in Article 49.

---
GOODY'S FAMILY CLOTHING, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                              Thirteen                   Thirty-nine
                                                           Weeks Ended                  Weeks Ended                  
                                                      October 31,     November 1,     October 31,       November 1,
                                                       1998              1997          1998                1997      
                                                    ------------  ----------------- -------------   -----------------
<S>                                               <C>               <C>               <C>           <C>    

Net earnings                                       $3,267,000        $5,535,000        $19,693,000    $16,011,000       
                                                   ==========        ==========        ===========    ===========         

Weighted average common shares                                                                           
   outstanding - Basic (a)                         33,328,000         32,651,000        33,099,000      32,498,000

Common equivalent shares for outstanding stock                                                                         
  options                                             994,000          1,299,000         1,294,000       1,089,000
                                                   ----------         ----------        ----------      ----------
Weighted average common shares                                                                                         
   outstanding - Diluted (a)                       34,322,000         33,950,000        34,393,000      33,587,000
                                                   ==========         ==========        ==========      ==========

Earnings per common share (a)
  Basic                                            $     0.10       $      0.17        $     0.59      $     0.49
                                                   ==========       ===========        ==========      ==========
                                                
                                                    
  Diluted                                          $     0.10       $      0.16        $     0.57      $     0.48
                                                   ==========       ===========        ==========      ==========       
                                                            
</TABLE>


(a) The Company  adopted  Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards No. 128,
"Earnings  per  Share"  as  required  in the  fourth  quarter  of  fiscal  1997.
Accordingly,  earnings per share and related data for the periods ended November
1, 1997 have been restated to conform to this new standard.

Earnings per share and related data for the periods ended  November 1, 1997 have
also been restated to reflect a two-for-one stock split effected in July 1998.
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON

5001 SPRING VALLEY ROAD

SUITE 800 EAST

DALLAS, TEXAS 75244

 

February 24, 2013

 

Nexen Inc.

801-7th Avenue S.W.

Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P7

 

Board of Directors:

 

We hereby consent to references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton, and information from our opinion letter concerning the United Kingdom, Nigeria, and Canada relating to our evaluation, as of December 31, 2012 (the “Opinion”), of certain oil and gas properties of Nexen Inc. (the “Corporation”), contained in the sections entitled “Reserves, Production and Related Information” and “Interests of Experts” in the Annual Information Form of the Corporation dated February 24, 2013, which is included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Form 40-F”), as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) the Form 40-F; (ii) the Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-119276, 333-118019 and 333-13574), (iii) the Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-172612, 333-142670, 333-142652 and 333-84786), and (iv) the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-174753), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable. We further consent to the Corporation filing the Opinion with any Canadian or United States securities commission or regulatory authority as it relates to the above mentioned filings.

 

 
|   | Very   truly yours,                       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |                                      |
|   |                                      |
|   | /s/   DeGolyer and MacNaughton            |
|   | DeGOLYER   and MacNAUGHTON                |
|   | Texas   Registered Engineering Firm F-716 |

 

1

----
April 16, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ANTHONY CORLETTO, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00182-CV V.

WELLINGTON PARK PATIO HOME ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on September 23, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Anthony Corletto.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 09-1229

MAGUETTE FAYE,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Repondent.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on September 2, 2009, is

amended as follows:

On page 5, line 16, "August 1, 2009" is changed to "August,

1, 2007".
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                          WIRELESS TELECOM GROUP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        For the Three Months
                                                          Ended March 31,
                                                          ---------------
                                                         2002           2001
                                                         ----           ----
<S>                                                   <C>           <C>
Net income                                            $  368,652    $1,223,875
                                                      ==========    ==========

BASIC EARNINGS:

Weighted average number of common shares
Outstanding                                           17,167,437    18,311,628
                                                      ==========    ==========

Basic earnings per common share:                          $ 0.02        $ 0.07

DILUTED EARNINGS:

Weighted average number of common shares
Outstanding                                           17,167,437    18,311,628
Stock options                                            671,721       241,925
                                                     -----------   -----------

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding, as adjusted                              17,839,158    18,553,553
                                                      ==========    ==========

Diluted earnings per common share:                        $ 0.02        $ 0.07

</TABLE>



                                                                              13
In 2014, the National Organic Program’s (NOP) Sound and Sensible initiative funded 14 year-long projects 

across the United States aimed at making organic certification more accessible, attainable, and affordable 

while maintaining high standards, ensuring compliance, and protecting organic integrity. Project leads 

worked directly with organic farmers and businesses to identify and remove barriers to certification, 

streamline the certification and recordkeeping process, and conduct education and outreach.

The Sound and Sensible projects 

have resulted in a trove of valuable 

tools, guides, and training materials. 

These resources will benefit the 

broader organic community, 

including the nearly 20,000 certified 

organic producers and processing 

facilities across the United States. 

Many of the projects focused 

on outreach to underserved 

communities, such as non-native 

English speakers and Plain/Amish 

communities, about the benefits of 

organic certification. 

NCAT West

ALBA

Organic Services WILL Interactive 

and Carolina Farm 

Stewardship

16

6 7

6

5

3 3

Acronym Definitions: ALBA - Agriculture and Land-Based Training Association; IOIA - International Organic Inspectors Association; NOFA VT - Northeast Organic Farmers Association Vermont; OEFFA - Ohio Ecological Food 

and Farm Association; PA - Pennsylvania; WSDA - Washington State Department of Agriculture

WSDA

IOIA

NOFA VT

OEFFA Oregon Tilth

“As a part of the National Organic 

Program’s Sound and Sensible 

initiative to identify and remove 

barriers to certification...[we 

are developing a] tool to help 

beginning farmers identify 

how the “next step” of organic 

certification can support their 

core values, enhance their 

operations, and increase their 

financial success.”

Massachusetts-Baystate 

Organic Certifiers

“We believe giving farmers 

that extra help they need 

with paperwork, strategy and 

answers to common questions 

is extremely valuable.”

National Center for Appropriate Technology 

(NCAT) South

According to Gulf States Regional Director Rockiell 

Woods, one goal of the workshops is to reach 

and educate new, beginning, minority, and 

historically underserved farmers to help them 

with organic and sustainable farming. “We also want 

to aid farmers in transitioning from conventional farm 

systems to certified organic and sustainable farming 

practices,” said Woods.

California Certified Organic Farmers (CCOF)

“With the NOP’s support and 

collaboration, many of CCOF’s helpful 

approaches and new ideas can be 

implemented nationwide to benefit all 

organic operations.”

Florida Organic Growers

75 16 15

tip sheets / 

fact sheets

training 

workshops & 

curricula

informative 

videos

PA Certified 

Organic

Organic System 

Plans

Certification Recordkeeping

Inspections

Organic Value 

Proposition

Standards/

Implementation

Producer Group 

Processes

projects and 

organizations

public-facing 

products

Product Topic Areas Types of Products

• Efficient Processes

• Streamlined Recordkeeping

• Practical Plans

• Fair, Focused Enforcement

• Integrity First

Sound & 

Sensible 

Principles
# C_2016202EN.01003601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/36

---

Article 38

(ex Article 25 TEU)

(ex Article 25 TEU)

Without prejudice to Article 240 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a Political and Security Committee shall monitor the international situation in the areas covered by the common foreign and security policy and contribute to the definition of policies by delivering opinions to the Council at the request of the Council or of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy or on its own initiative. It shall also monitor the implementation of agreed policies, without prejudice to the powers of the High Representative.

Within the scope of this Chapter, the Political and Security Committee shall exercise, under the responsibility of the Council and of the High Representative, the political control and strategic direction of the crisis management operations referred to in Article 43.

The Council may authorise the Committee, for the purpose and for the duration of a crisis management operation, as determined by the Council, to take the relevant decisions concerning the political control and strategic direction of the operation.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1087 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rulemaking, to include 

a link to a 100-word plain language summary of the proposed rule. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. HOLDING, Mr. 

HUIZENGA, Mr. RIGGLEMAN, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. 

CHABOT, Mr. HARRIS, and Mr. RATCLIFFE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rulemaking, 

to include a link to a 100-word plain language summary 

of the proposed rule. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Account5 ability Through Transparency Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100-WORD SUMMARY TO 

7 REGULATIONS.GOV. 

8 Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1087 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘; and’’ and in2 serting ‘‘;’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(4) the internet address of a summary of not 

8 more than 100 words in length of the proposed rule, 

9 in plain language, that shall be posted on the inter10 net website under section 206(d) of the E-Govern11 ment Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) (commonly 

12 known as regulations.gov);’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
NOSB Recommendation on Mushroom Practice Standards 

As Amended at the NOSB Meeting 

October 17, 2001

Mushroom Standards

Mr. Sideman motioned to adopt the mushroom standards as written. 

 

Mr. Bandele proposed an amendment adding the following sentence: "Agricultural material[s] 

such as grain or straw that are used in uncomposted media must be organically produced when 

commercially available." The amendment failed, 7 opposed, 6 in favor, with 2 absent. 

Mr. Harper proposed an amendment changing language on sawdust to read, "Sawdust, logs or 

other materials derived from wood used as a growth media must not have been treated with a 

prohibited substance." The amendment failed, 8 opposed, 3 in favor, 2 abstaining, 2 absent. 

Mr. Lockeretz proposed a friendly amendment changing the word "media" to "medium." 

Bob Pooler called for a vote on the motion as modified by the friendly amendment, and the 

motion passed, 11 in favor, 1 opposed, 1 abstention, 2 absent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEONARD CHAMBERS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 286 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of April, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

. The issue , as stated by petitioner

, is:

When a judge orally renders a guilty verdict on an offense by name only, and "not guilty" as to the remaining charges, may a reviewing court ignore the judge's express words and rely on the written sentencing order and the record as a whole to determine which charged offenses the judge intended to include within the conviction, and does doing so violate the double jeopardy protections of the Pennsylvania and Federal Constitutions?
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00475-CV

ADOLFO VELA D/B/A ADELCO ENTERPRISES

v.

CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

On Appeal from the

445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2012-DCL-4362-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed 

and remanded in part. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN 

PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings 

consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant, Adolfo 

Vela d/b/a Adelco Enterprises.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 16, 2015