alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply2326Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  William Wood (not verified)PermalinkJanuary 5, 2021 - 5:35pmFantastic statistics, and a major accomplishment ever 4 years for our country!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1





---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IEA Income Fund XII, L.P. on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dennis J. Tietz, the
President and Director of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC) and Principal Executive
Officer of the CCC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                              
| | ---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.
|
| |      |  | August 13, 2002                                                                                                                                    

| |                                                                                                           |                    
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------
| | By                                                                                                        | /s/ Dennis J. Tietz
| |                                                                                                          
| | Dennis J. Tietz
President and Director of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC)
Principal Executive Officer of CCC
# C_2016202EN.01018601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/186 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/186

---

Article 318

(ex Article 275 TEC)

(ex Article 275 TEC)

The Commission shall submit annually to the European Parliament and to the Council the accounts of the preceding financial year relating to the implementation of the budget. The Commission shall also forward to them a financial statement of the assets and liabilities of the Union.

The Commission shall also submit to the European Parliament and to the Council an evaluation report on the Union's finances based on the results achieved, in particular in relation to the indications given by the European Parliament and the Council pursuant to Article 319.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0418 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RYAN CLINTON BLOOMER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 11 , 2024 within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 2 2024

08/02/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0418
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00195-CR

IN RE Douglas R. LYON

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On April 1, 2015, relator Douglas R. Lyon filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus 

seeking an order from this court directing the Chief Medical Examiner at the Bexar County 

Medical Examiner’s Office to respond to relator’s requests for records. However, this court does 

not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. By statute, this court has the authority to issue a 

writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district” and 

other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.

§ 22.221(a)-(b) (West 2004). We conclude the writ is not necessary to enforce our jurisdiction.

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1993CR5434, styled The State of Texas v. Douglas R. Lyon, pending in the 

226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.
##### 



Exhibit 11.2 CANON INC. CODE OF ETHICS
(SUPPLEMENT TO THE CANON GROUP CODE OF CONDUCT) March 31, 2004 Canon Inc. (the Company) has a Canon Group Code of Conduct (the Code of
Conduct) applicable to all executives and employees of the Company, and they
are obliged to observe the provisions set forth therein, including those
relating to honest and ethical conduct (including the handling of conflicts of
interest), compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations and
accountability for adherence to provisions of the Code of Conduct. In
addition, in view of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on July 2002, the
Company sets this Code of Ethics applicable to the President & Chief Executive
Officer, each member of the Companys board of directors and General Managers
belonging to the Accounting Headquarters (collectively, the Covered
Individuals) as follows.  1.
    
    Each of the Covered Individuals is responsible for full, fair,
accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in (a) reports and
documents that the Company files with or submits to the SEC and (b)
the Companys other communications with the public, including both
written and oral disclosures, statements and presentations.
Accordingly, it is the responsibility of each Covered Individual to
(i) promptly bring to the attention of appropriate Company personnel
any material information of which he or she may become aware which
affects the public disclosures made by the Company in its SEC reports
or otherwise and (ii) assist in ensuring that the Company establishes
and maintains effective disclosure controls and procedures and
effective internal control over financial reporting in respect of the
foregoing reports, documents and other communications.  2.
    
    Each of the Covered Individuals shall promptly bring to the
attention of the Companys President & Chief Executive Officer, or to
whom he or she deems it appropriate, any information he or she may
have concerning any violation of the Code of Conduct or the Code of
Ethics by any of the Covered Individuals.  3.
    
    The Company intends to prevent the occurrence of conduct by the
Covered Individuals which is not in compliance with the Code of
Conduct or with this Code of Ethics and to halt such conduct that may
occur as soon as reasonably possible after its discovery. Those
Covered Individuals found to be in violation of the Group Code or
this Code of Ethics after due investigation are subject to
appropriate disciplinary action, up to and including termination of
employment. Criminal misconduct may be referred to the appropriate
legal authorities for prosecution. Amendments to the Code of Conduct and to this Code of Ethics must be
approved by the Companys board of directors. Any such amendment (other
than technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments) shall
be disclosed in the Companys next annual report on Form 20-F.
EXHIBIT 11


                                           GOODY'S FAMILY CLOTHING, INC.


                              STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                       -----------------------------------
                                                                              Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                                                       -----------------------------------
                                                                          May 1, 1999       May 2, 1998
                                                                       ------------------ ----------------
                                                                          (unaudited)       (unaudited)
<S>                                                                       <C>                <C>

Net earnings                                                             $    7,883,000   $    7,768,000
                                                                         ===============  ==============

Weighted average common shares
   outstanding - Basic (a)                                                    33,333,000       33,164,000

Common shares represented by stock options
   outstanding under the treasury stock method                                   585,000        1,454,000

Weighted average common shares
                                                                             ----------       ----------
  outstanding - Diluted (a)                                                  33,918,000       34,618,000
                                                                             ==========      ==========

Earnings per common share (a)
  Basic                                                                   $        0.24       $     0.23
                                                                          ==============     ===========
  Diluted                                                                 $        0.23       $     0.22
                                                                          ==============     ===========

</TABLE>



(a) In July 1998, the Company effected a two-for-one stock split. All previously
reported  earnings per share and related data have been restated to reflect such
stock split.













<PAGE>
# C_2016202EN.01014401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/144 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/144

---

Article 217

(ex Article 310 TEC)

(ex Article 310 TEC)

The Union may conclude with one or more third countries or international organisations agreements establishing an association involving reciprocal rights and obligations, common action and special procedure.

---
# L_2004376EN.01003501.xml

| 23.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 376/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 376/35

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 105/2004

of 9 July 2004

amending Annex XI (Telecommunication services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 75/2004 of 8 June 2004 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 75/2004 of 8 June 2004 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2003/821/EC of 21 November 2003 on the adequate protection of personal data in Guernsey (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2003/821/EC of 21 November 2003 on the adequate protection of personal data in Guernsey (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 5eg (Commission Decision 2003/490/EC) of Annex XI to the Agreement:

| ‘5eh. | 32003 D 0821: Commission Decision 2003/821/EC of 21 November 2003 on the adequate protection of personal data in Guernsey (OJ L 308, 25.11.2003, p. 27).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘5eh.

32003 D 0821: Commission Decision 2003/821/EC of 21 November 2003 on the adequate protection of personal data in Guernsey (OJ L 308, 25.11.2003, p. 27).’

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2003/821/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 July 2004, provided that all the notifications under Article 103 (1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kjartan JÓHANNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 308, 25.11.2003, p. 27.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned,  Joseph V. Roberts, Chief Executive Officer of Nutrition Management
Services  Company,  a  Pennsylvania  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2003 of
the Company (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and  the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ Joseph V. Roberts
                                            ---------------------
                                            Joseph V. Roberts
                                            Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2003
```
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

|                                                        |   |                           |   |                                                |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |   | **State of**                   |   | **Name under which**                                |
| **Name of Subsidiary**                                      |   | **Incorporation/Organization** |   | **Subsidiary does Business**                        |
|                                                        |   |                           |   |                                                |
| CHW LLC

                                              |   | Delaware                       |   | CHW  LLC                                            |
| Providence Insurance  Company,    Limited

  |   | A  Bermudian Company           |   | Providence  Insurance Company,    Limited |
| CatoSouth LLC

                                        |   | North    Carolina              |   | CatoSouth  LLC                                      |
| Cato of Texas L.P.

                                   |   | Texas                          |   | Cato  of Texas L.P.                                 |
| Cato Southwest, Inc.

                                 |   | Delaware                       |   | Cato  Southwest, Inc.                               |
| CaDel LLC

                                            |   | Delaware                       |   | CaDel  LLC                                          |
| CatoWest LLC

                                         |   | Nevada                         |   | CatoWest  LLC                                       |
| Cedar Hill National Bank

                             |   | A  Nationally Chartered Bank   |   | Cedar  Hill National Bank                           |
| catocorp.com,  LLC                                          |   | Delaware                       |   | catocorp.com,  LLC                                  |

 

 

 

65

 

----
Supreme Court of the United States
Office of the Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001

Scott S. Harris
Clerk of the Court

April 20, 2015 (202) 479-3011

Clerk ILE

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District
Potter County Courts Bldg. APR et ana

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A SouRtT OF APPEALS
Amarillo, TX 79101 SEE NLONG. CLERK

Re: Elnora Moses
v. Texas Workforce Commission, et al.
No. 14-8382
(Your No. 07-12-00207-CV)

Dear Clerk:
The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

Gaull &. Hoo

Scott S. Harris, Clerk
CHAPTER 19-20.3

ANHYDROUS AMMONIA RISK MANAGEMENT

19-20.3-01. (Contingent effective date - See note.) Risk management program -

Anhydrous ammonia.

In order to determine compliance with the risk management program requirements set forth

in section 112 of the Clean Air Act of 1990 [42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.], as amended through

June 30, 2011, the agriculture commissioner may:

1. Request information from any person that:

a. Sells, stores, or handles anhydrous ammonia for agricultural purposes; and

b. Is required to comply with the risk management program requirements;

2. Conduct inspections of any person that:

a. Sells, stores, or handles anhydrous ammonia for agricultural purposes; and

b. Is required to comply with the risk management program requirements; and

3. Obtain and review risk management plans required under 40 Code of Federal

Regulations, part 68, as amended through June 30, 2011, and other records

applicable to any person that:

a. Sells, stores, or handles anhydrous ammonia for agricultural purposes; and

b. Is required to comply with the risk management program requirements.

19-20.3-02. (Contingent effective date - See note.) Risk management program -

Enforcement authority.

If the agriculture commissioner determines that there is noncompliance on the part of any

person that sells, stores, or handles anhydrous ammonia for agricultural purposes and that is

required to comply with the risk management program requirements referenced in section

19-20.3-01, the agriculture commissioner may:

1. Bring an action to enjoin a violation or a threatened violation;

2. Issue a cease and desist order; and

3. Impose a civil penalty through an administrative hearing in an amount not exceeding

ten thousand dollars per day for each violation.

Page No. 1
##### 



(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Partnership.
  By
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cronos Capital Corp.,General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of Cronos
Capital Corp., General Partner of the Partnership A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-12-01146-CR

JAY SCOTT GARRISON, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 178th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1302172).

TO THE 178TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 26th day of June, 2014, the case upon appeal to revise or to 

reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment of 

December 10, 2012. After submitting the case on the appellate 

record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the 

Court holds that the record erroneously reflects that the 

sentence was imposed and was to commence on February 2, 

2013 and that findings on a deadly weapon are not applicable. 

Accordingly, the Court modifies the referenced portion of the 

trial court’s judgment to reflect December 10, 2012 as the date 

the sentence was imposed and was to commence and “Yes, a 

Firearm” as the finding on deadly weapon. 

The Court further holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the 

trial court’s judgment as herein modified.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.
Judgment rendered June 26, 2014.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices 

Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

April 17, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT