alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amendment to the Quarterly Report of American
HomePatient, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Joseph F. Furlong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

This Certification is executed as of April 29, 2003.


                                            /s/ Joseph F. Furlong
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Joseph F. Furlong
                                            Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 15.1










American HomePatient, Inc.
Brentwood, Tennessee


Re: Registration Statements No. 333-56313, No. 333-56317, No. 333-125013, and
    No. 333-125015


With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated August 9, 2005 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is
not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



                                  /s/ KPMG, LLP




August 9, 2005
Nashville, Tennessee
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dean L. Cash, Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of ATEL
Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 17, 2007



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|/s/    Dean L. Cash                                                  
|Dean L. Cash President and Chief Executive Officer of Managing Member

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2016202EN.01008001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/80

---

Article 83

(ex Article 31 TEU)

(ex Article 31 TEU)

1.   The European Parliament and the Council may, by means of directives adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, establish minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the areas of particularly serious crime with a cross-border dimension resulting from the nature or impact of such offences or from a special need to combat them on a common basis.

These areas of crime are the following: terrorism, trafficking in human beings and sexual exploitation of women and children, illicit drug trafficking, illicit arms trafficking, money laundering, corruption, counterfeiting of means of payment, computer crime and organised crime.

On the basis of developments in crime, the Council may adopt a decision identifying other areas of crime that meet the criteria specified in this paragraph. It shall act unanimously after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.

2.   If the approximation of criminal laws and regulations of the Member States proves essential to ensure the effective implementation of a Union policy in an area which has been subject to harmonisation measures, directives may establish minimum rules with regard to the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area concerned. Such directives shall be adopted by the same ordinary or special legislative procedure as was followed for the adoption of the harmonisation measures in question, without prejudice to Article 76.

3.   Where a member of the Council considers that a draft directive as referred to in paragraph 1 or 2 would affect fundamental aspects of its criminal justice system, it may request that the draft directive be referred to the European Council. In that case, the ordinary legislative procedure shall be suspended. After discussion, and in case of a consensus, the European Council shall, within four months of this suspension, refer the draft back to the Council, which shall terminate the suspension of the ordinary legislative procedure.

Within the same timeframe, in case of disagreement, and if at least nine Member States wish to establish enhanced cooperation on the basis of the draft directive concerned, they shall notify the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission accordingly. In such a case, the authorisation to proceed with enhanced cooperation referred to in Article 20(2) of the Treaty on European Union and Article 329(1) of this Treaty shall be deemed to be granted and the provisions on enhanced cooperation shall apply.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS AT AUGUST 2, 1997 AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED ON AUGUST 2, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997
<CASH>                                          41,667
<SECURITIES>                                     1,512
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    153,653
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,668
<PP&E>                                         138,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,905
<BONDS>                                            871
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,662
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,140
<SALES>                                        402,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               402,263
<CGS>                                          289,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,761
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,476
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,476
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 152 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

810 South Pendleton Street in Easley, South Carolina, as the ‘‘Captain 

Kimberly Nicole Hampton Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. 

CLYBURN, and Mr. RICE of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 810 South Pendleton Street in Easley, South 

Carolina, as the ‘‘Captain Kimberly Nicole Hampton 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN KIMBERLY NICOLE HAMPTON POST 

4 OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 810 South Pendleton Street in 

7 Easley, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 152 IH

1 the ‘‘Captain Kimberly Nicole Hampton Post Office Build2 ing’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Kimberly Ni7 cole Hampton Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13A-14**

**PROMULGATED UNDER**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

I,Jack A. Cuneo, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the registrant and we have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and 

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986, Section III E.] 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: December 7, 2006
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HomePatient, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marilyn O'Hara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

This Certification is executed as of April 29, 2003.


                                            /s/ Marilyn O'Hara
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Marilyn O'Hara
                                            Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 12012M046 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M046

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE V: GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION AND SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Chapter 2: Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy - Section 2: Provisions on the common security and defence policy - Article 46 **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0040 - 0041 *

Article 46

1. Those Member States which wish to participate in the permanent structured cooperation referred to in Article 42(6), which fulfil the criteria and have made the commitments on military capabilities set out in the Protocol on permanent structured cooperation, shall notify their intention to the Council and to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.

2. Within three months following the notification referred to in paragraph 1 the Council shall adopt a decision establishing permanent structured cooperation and determining the list of participating Member States. The Council shall act by a qualified majority after consulting the High Representative.

3. Any Member State which, at a later stage, wishes to participate in the permanent structured cooperation shall notify its intention to the Council and to the High Representative.

The Council shall adopt a decision confirming the participation of the Member State concerned which fulfils the criteria and makes the commitments referred to in Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on permanent structured cooperation. The Council shall act by a qualified majority after consulting the High Representative. Only members of the Council representing the participating Member States shall take part in the vote.

A qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

4. If a participating Member State no longer fulfils the criteria or is no longer able to meet the commitments referred to in Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on permanent structured cooperation, the Council may adopt a decision suspending the participation of the Member State concerned.

The Council shall act by a qualified majority. Only members of the Council representing the participating Member States, with the exception of the Member State in question, shall take part in the vote.

A qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

5. Any participating Member State which wishes to withdraw from permanent structured cooperation shall notify its intention to the Council, which shall take note that the Member State in question has ceased to participate.

6. The decisions and recommendations of the Council within the framework of permanent structured cooperation, other than those provided for in paragraphs 2 to 5, shall be adopted by unanimity. For the purposes of this paragraph, unanimity shall be constituted by the votes of the representatives of the participating Member States only.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Stavros Konstantatos, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Constantine Konstantatos, Deceased, Appellant, v County of Suffolk, Defendant, and Dealers Leasing Corp. et al., Respondents.

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Brown, J.), entered December 27, 1989, which, *inter alia,*granted the motion by the defendants Dealers Leasing Corp. and Michael D. Kelly to strike the plaintiff’s supplemental bill of particulars dated May 19, 1989, and which denied his motion for leave to serve the supplemental bill of particulars on all defendants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff’s decedent was killed in an automobile accident. At the time of his death, the plaintiff’s decedent was the manager of two diners that his family owned and operated. The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for wrongful death as the administrator of his son’s estate and in his individual capacity.

The plaintiff served a supplemental bill of particulars dated May 19, 1989, which claimed as special damages the loss of profits and the decrease in value of two corporations which did business as the family diners. Two of the defendants, Dealers Leasing Corp. and Michael D. Kelly, moved to strike this supplemental bill of particulars, arguing that the special damages, which alleged pecuniary loss to corporations, were not recoverable in a wrongful death action. The plaintiff cross-moved for leave to serve the supplemental bill of particulars on all defendants nunc pro tunc.

*654We find that the court properly granted the respondents’ motion to strike the bill of particulars and denied the plaintiffs motion. Damages in a wrongful death action are limited to the "fair and just compensation for the pecuniary injuries resulting from the decedent’s death to the persons for whose benefit the action is brought” (EPTL 5-4.3). Although a corporation which employed a decedent may suffer pecuniary injury due to his death, a corporation is not a beneficiary of the decedent, and thus, is not a "person * * * for whose benefit” the wrongful death action is brought. The decedent’s future earnings capacity has traditionally been one of the factors used in determining the damages recoverable in a wrongful death action *(see, Johnson v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*71 NY2d 198, 203). However, there is no evidence that the profits of the corporations were chiefly personal to the plaintiffs decedent. Accordingly, there is no merit to the plaintiffs argument that the alleged loss of profits and decrease in value of the corporations due to the death of the plaintiff’s decedent, are factors to be considered in measuring his loss of future earnings capacity *(see, Young v Utica Mut. Ins. Co.,*86 AD2d 764). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
# C_2016202EN.01013101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/131 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/131

---

Article 188

(ex Article 172 TEC)

(ex Article 172 TEC)

The Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, shall adopt the provisions referred to in Article 187.

The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, shall adopt the provisions referred to in Articles 183, 184 and 185. Adoption of the supplementary programmes shall require the agreement of the Member States concerned.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                NGC CORPORATION

     NGC Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"),

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST:  That the Board of Directors of the Corporation duly adopted
resolutions proposing and declaring the following amendment of the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation to be advisable and recommending
the adoption of such amendment by the stockholders of the Corporation.

     SECOND:  That in lieu of a meeting and vote of the stockholders of the
Corporation, the requisite stockholder approval was obtained by written consent
to the following amendment in accordance with the provisions of Section 228 of
the Delaware General Corporation Law ("DGCL") and prompt notice of taking of
corporate action without a meeting has been duly given in accordance with
Section 228(d) of the DGCL.

     THIRD:  The Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is
amended by deleting article First in its entirety and replacing it with a new
article First which reads as follows:

          "FIRST. The name of the corporation is 'Dynegy Inc.' (the
     'Corporation')."

     FOURTH:  That the amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the DGCL.

     FIFTH:  This Certificate of Amendment shall become effective at 5:00 p.m.,
Eastern Standard Time, on July 6, 1998.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, NGC Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by C.L. Watson, its Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
this 6th day of July, 1998.


                                    NGC CORPORATION


                                    By:    /s/  C.L. Watson
                                       --------------------
                                           C.L. Watson
                                           Chairman of the Board and
                                           Chief Executive Officer