alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Weylin Alford v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00822-CR

Trial court case number: 1404673

Trial court: 177th District Court of Harris County, Texas

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the abovereferenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 

1396, 1400 (1967). On March 3, 2015, we granted appellant’s pro se motion requesting 

access to a copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed 

counsel’s brief and extended the time within which to file a response to counsel’s Anders

brief to April 2, 2015. The trial court clerk has notified the Clerk of this Court that the 

appellate record has been sent to appellant and he has received the record.

Appellant has filed a motion for “extension of time/default,” requesting the Court 

to enter a judgment granting his motion for extension of time/default. We construe 

appellant’s motion as a request for an extension of time within which to file a response to 

counsel’s Anders brief and grant the requested extension. Appellant’s response to his 

appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed within 30 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 16, 2015
July 2023 / www.ams.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

National Federal Milk Marketing Order 

2023 Pricing Formula Hearing

EXHIBIT EXAMPLE
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 16, 2015

NO. 03-14-00815-CV

N. D., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on December 1, 2014. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form N-2 (No. 333-259455) and Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No 333-258899) of Capital Southwest Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) of our report dated May 24, 2022, relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the schedule of investments in and advances to Affiliates of the Company listed in Schedule 12-14 attached as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2022 (the Form 10-K), and of our report dated May 24, 2022 on the financial information set forth in Part II, Item 5 of the Form 10-K under the heading “Senior Securities,” which is attached as an exhibit to the Form 10-K. We also consent to the references to us under the headings “Senior Securities” in the Form 10-K.





/s/ RSM US LLP





Chicago, Illinois


May 24, 2022
<PAGE>   1
                AMENDMENT OF 1991 NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN


                               AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO
                     1991 NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN OF
                           AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC.


         Amendment No. 7 to 1991 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") of
American HomePatient, Inc. (the "Corporation") as approved by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation on March 20, 1998.

         The Plan shall be amended by deleting paragraph 3 thereof and replacing
it with a new number 3 so that, as amended, said paragraph 3 shall be and read
as follows:

                  3. Stock Subject to the Plan. There will be reserved for
         issuance upon the exercise of Options 3,500,000 shares of Common Stock,
         which will be authorized and unissued Common Stock. If an Option
         expires or terminates for any reason without being exercised in full,
         the shares subject thereto which have not been purchased will again be
         available for purposes of the Plan. The number of shares as to which
         Options may be granted under the Plan will be proportionately adjusted,
         to the nearest whole share, in the event of any stock dividend, stock
         split, share combination or similar recapitalization involving the
         Common Stock or any spin-off, spin-out or other significant
         distribution of assets of stockholders for which the Corporation
         receives no consideration. In the event that there is an insufficient
         number of authorized shares of Common Stock available to allow exercise
         of the Options on the date of any grant hereunder, such Options will
         not be exercisable until there are sufficient shares of Common Stock
         authorized for issuance.

                                                              -End of Amendment-
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yang Holding Company ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I. James
Chow, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all Material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operation of the Company.

                                                  /s/ James Chow
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  James Chow
                                                  President, Treasurer and
                                                  Secretary. Principal
                                                  Financial and
                                                  Accounting Officer.
May 13, 2005
# C_2016202EN.01040301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/403 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/403

---

Article 47

Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial

Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this Article.

Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law. Everyone shall have the possibility of being advised, defended and represented.

Legal aid shall be made available to those who lack sufficient resources in so far as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice.

---
# NICHINO 

# AMERICA April 8, 2014 Via E-mail Document Processing Desk (VOLCAN) Office of Pesticide Programs (7504P) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Room S-4900, One Potomac Yard 2777 South Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-4501 ATIENTION : Michael Walsh, Acting PM #13 RE: Voluntary Cancellation ofTebufenpyrad Registrations (AC 801,757 Miticide-Insecticide EPA Reg. No. 71711-22 and AC 801,757 3EC Miticide-Insecticide EPA Reg. No. 71711-23) Dear Mr. Walsh, Nichino America, Inc. herein requests to cancel the registrations for AC 801,757 technical (EPA Reg. No . 71711-22) and AC 801,757 3EC formulation (EPA Reg. No . 71711-23) under Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA. These products are not currently manufactured or commercialized for use. In orderto expedite this action , Nichino America, Inc. requests to waive the standard 180-day public comment period in favor of a 30-day comment period. Sincerely, Lydia Cox, Ph.D., DABT Director, Regulatory Affairs Nichino America, Inc. Email: lcox@nichino .net cc: Deborah McCall, Branch Chief - Insecticides

NICHINO AMERICA, INC. 4550 New Linden Hill Road, Suite SOL Wilmington, DE 19808 888-740-7700 www.nichino.net
|                                  |   |                   |   | Percentage of Outstanding Stock |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   | Place of Incorporation |   | or Ownership Interest Held      |   |
| Name of Subsidiary                    |   | or Organization        |   | by Registrant                   |   |
|                                  |   |                   |   |                            |   |
| Cal-Maine Farms, Inc.                 |   | Delaware               |   |                            | 100    | % |
| Southern Equipment Distributors, Inc. |   | Mississippi            |   |                            | 100    | % |
| South Texas Applicators, Inc.         |   | Delaware               |   |                            | 100    | % |
| CMF of Kansas, LLC                    |   | Delaware               |   |                            | (1     | ) |
| American Egg Products, Inc.           |   | Georgia                |   |                            | 99.5   | % |
| Texas Egg Products, LLC               |   | Texas                  |   |                            | 36.7   | % |
| Benton County Foods, LLC              |   | Arkansas               |   |                            | 100    | % |

----

| (1) | Limited liability company of which Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Cal-Maine Farms, Inc. are members and have 99% and 1% interests, respectively. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
# C_2016202EN.01040501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/405 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/405

---

Article 53

Level of protection

Nothing in this Charter shall be interpreted as restricting or adversely affecting human rights and fundamental freedoms as recognised, in their respective fields of application, by Union law and international law and by international agreements to which the Union or all the Member States are party, including the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and by the Member States' constitutions.

---
esl:Signer1:Signature}}

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE 

Specialty Crops Inspection Division 

CERTIFICATE OF QUALITY AND CONDITION 

(PROCESSED FOODS) 

PAGE OF 

CERTIFICATE NO.

DATE 

APPLICANT ADDRESS 

RECEIVER OR BUYER ADDRESS 

SOURCE OF SAMPLES PRODUCT INSPECTED 

CODE MARKS ON CONTAINERS 

PRINCIPAL LABEL MARKS 

EXAMPLE

Grade: 

Remarks: 

This certif icate is receivablein all courts of the UnitedStates as prima facie evidence of the truth of the statements therein contained. It does not excuse failure to comply with any applicable 

Federal or State laws. 

WARNING: Any person who knowingly falselymake, issue, alter, forge, or counterfeit this certificate, or participate in any such action, is subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 or 

imprisonment for not more than oneyear, or both (7U.S.C. 1622 (h)). 

Pursuant to regulations issued by the Secretary of Agriculture under the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended (7 U. S.C. 1621-1627), governing the inspectioncertificationof theproduct 

designated herein, I certify that the quality andcondition of the product shownby samples inspected on the above date were as shown, subject to any restrictions specified above 

ADDRESS OF SERVICING OFFICE SIGNATURE OF APPROVING OFFICIAL 

SC-146 ES USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
April 8, 2015 

Honorable Christopher A. Prine 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

301 Fannin, Suite 245 

Houston, Texas 77002 

 

 Re: Dylan Jezreel Garcia v. State 

 Cause No. 14-14-00387-CR 

 

Dear Mr. Prine,

In response to the Court’s letter dated February 23, 2015, concerning oral argument in 

this case, please note the undersigned will be presenting oral argument. Please excuse the 

oversight of not sending this earlier. Thank you for your attention. 

If you any questions, please call me. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ Crespin Michael Linton

 Crespin Michael Linton

ACCEPTED

14-14-00387-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/8/2015 3:50:37 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 3:50:37 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
# EUR-Lex - 12012M024 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M024

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE V: GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION AND SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Chapter 2: Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy - Section 1: Common provisions - Article 24 (ex Article 11 TEU) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0030 - 0031 *

Article 24

(ex Article 11 TEU)

1. The Union's competence in matters of common foreign and security policy shall cover all areas of foreign policy and all questions relating to the Union's security, including the progressive framing of a common defence policy that might lead to a common defence.

The common foreign and security policy is subject to specific rules and procedures. It shall be defined and implemented by the European Council and the Council acting unanimously, except where the Treaties provide otherwise. The adoption of legislative acts shall be excluded. The common foreign and security policy shall be put into effect by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and by Member States, in accordance with the Treaties. The specific role of the European Parliament and of the Commission in this area is defined by the Treaties. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall not have jurisdiction with respect to these provisions, with the exception of its jurisdiction to monitor compliance with Article 40 of this Treaty and to review the legality of certain decisions as provided for by the second paragraph of Article 275 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

2. Within the framework of the principles and objectives of its external action, the Union shall conduct, define and implement a common foreign and security policy, based on the development of mutual political solidarity among Member States, the identification of questions of general interest and the achievement of an ever-increasing degree of convergence of Member States' actions.

3. The Member States shall support the Union's external and security policy actively and unreservedly in a spirit of loyalty and mutual solidarity and shall comply with the Union's action in this area.

The Member States shall work together to enhance and develop their mutual political solidarity. They shall refrain from any action which is contrary to the interests of the Union or likely to impair its effectiveness as a cohesive force in international relations.

The Council and the High Representative shall ensure compliance with these principles.

--------------------------------------------------
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 2

LEGAL ACTS OF THE UNION, ADOPTION PROCEDURES AND OTHER PROVISIONS

SECTION 1

SECTION 1

THE LEGAL ACTS OF THE UNION

Article 289

1.   The ordinary legislative procedure shall consist in the joint adoption by the European Parliament and the Council of a regulation, directive or decision on a proposal from the Commission. This procedure is defined in Article 294.

2.   In the specific cases provided for by the Treaties, the adoption of a regulation, directive or decision by the European Parliament with the participation of the Council, or by the latter with the participation of the European Parliament, shall constitute a special legislative procedure.

3.   Legal acts adopted by legislative procedure shall constitute legislative acts.

4.   In the specific cases provided for by the Treaties, legislative acts may be adopted on the initiative of a group of Member States or of the European Parliament, on a recommendation from the European Central Bank or at the request of the Court of Justice or the European Investment Bank.

---
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Bonorrblo J. 5. Xurohlron 

Bresutfva Dlraotor 

State Dopsrtaunt of Publb woli8n 

Aurtln, Tbxar 

mar sir: 

"DOOB the 1 

oxpbnaad par yea 

Depondeat Wdld 

0r the a0mf 

ther llaitetton~, rbatriobe providbb by law, thb 

0 ($12) per moath for 8UOh ohll.er*n 

that tki bBIoU& t0 b0 

out 0r m4t9 r&i&- 

one MklliOll, nre 

Hundred Thousand Dollar8 ($L,500,000) per Y-r. 

The Legi31~ture may impore residential reetrlotloa~ 

8pd mob other reatsiotion5, limltetlons, end rwdlationrr 6P to it zlay sreasxpedlent. (%aphsei# OWE) 
Bonerable J. 9. Muohlaen, Page 8 

“The Lsglslaturo ahall have the authority to 

eoobpt rmm the Ooverment or the Vnlted State8 

8uoh flnenolal eaalatinos ta destitute ohlldren aa 

that Ooverment my 0rr0r not i5oonelatmt wltb 

the restriotione herein above provlC00.~ 

The ghraus Wuoh aeaistenoe* 88 first used in the 

above oonatitutional provision refer8 qmoifioally to t.ho 

oath payments to reoipisnta or eight and twelve Bollam, not 

inoluding any adminlstratlvo l xpelue whloh might hero boon 

inaurred kn making suoh paymentr. It seams reasonable to 

l uppos6 that the fmme phrase, Vuoh 888i8taxi~b” ShOtid bb 

given the aan% zeaniry when uaad ior the inoond tim, In the 

l a ma a *nto no 6, rith r43reronoa to the #1,800,000 annual Mmltatioa. 

It la not without a&nlfioaaob, we think, that In 

the oognata oonstitutlonal sm6ndmnt8, Sootion Slb authorizing 

old age aaeiatanos puymmrnt.8 and Sootion 610, authoriring aid 

to the needy blind, thsro was providmb a slnilar llmitatien 

upon the amount of aaalstanoe which might ba pai4 to oaoh 

reolpiaat, but no limitation upon the sd.minlstretlvs expondltursa nhioh might be rrsds in order 0rre0tividp to diatributb 

the l srletrnoe authorized. saotion sld la awrw reatrlotivb 

than thm greoadin& two amand:~entir in that It plaoaa a limitatlon upon the total annual bmefit paymmht6 to beatitutb OhildTbn. 

It ia our opinion that thr $lrWOrOOO annual limitation 

\~pon the amount thst may ba spent ror auaiatano~ to dsatltuta 

ohildren, a8 oontalnfd in Artiola III, Ssotlon 51.6 0r the 

Tbxsa ~onstitutlon appliers only to aotuel bensilt payments, 

and tbst the Leglslatum la authorlrod to appropri~ata In 

ddition to .$1,5oo,c~oo aa5ually r0r timit paymbnta to 

deatltuta ohlldren, suoh further 8uma a8 it may deem to ba 

neoessary ror the cffioient atmnistre.tion ot the pro&?rema 

By77kl..GQ?L~ 

4slter R. Yooh 

heei6teUt 

ERXtJP
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided: April 20, 2015

S15Y0827. IN THE MATTER OF WILSON R. SMITH.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Petition for Indefinite

Suspension Pending the Outcome of Criminal Charges filed by Respondent

WilsonR. Smith (StateBar No. 665025). Smith was arrested inToombs County

for theft by conversion and first and third degree forgery based on allegations

clients made in a civil case they filed against him. The district attorney for the

Middle Judicial Circuit has advised Smith’s attorney that the State will proceed

by indictment or accusation in that case, as well as in two other cases of alleged

theft, one in Toombs County and another in Emanuel County. Smith is currently

incarcerated.

In his petition, Smith acknowledges that Rule 8.4 (a) (2) of the Georgia

Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d), provides that a lawyer

shall not be convicted of a felony, and the maximum punishment is disbarment. 

He states that until he pleads or is found guilty, he cannot admit that he violated

Rule 8.4 (a) (2) without waiving his constitutional rights, including his right
against self-incrimination and his rights to the presumption of innocence, to due

process, to counsel, and to confront and cross-examine witnesses. Thus, he asks

theCourt to accept his petition for an indefinite suspension pending the outcome

of his criminal charges.

The State Bar responds that while there is no specific rule that

contemplates a suspension in this context, Smith’s request strikes a reasonable

balance between the need for public protection and Smith’s right to defend

against the criminal charges, see In the Matter of Swank, 288 Ga. 479 (704 SE2d

807) (2011), so it has no objection to the Court’s granting his petition. 

Having reviewed the record, the Court agrees that Smith’s request should

be granted. Therefore, it is hereby ordered that Wilson R. Smith be suspended

fromthe practice of law in this State during the pendency of the criminal charges

against him and until further order of this Court. Wilson is directed to notify the

State Bar’s Office of General Counsel in writing within seven days of any

disposition of the criminal charges, whether by plea, verdict, dismissal, first

offender adjudication, or otherwise. Wilson is reminded of his duties under Bar

Rule 4-219 (c).

Suspension until further order of the Court. All the Justices concur.

2
ACCEPTED

12-14-00027-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

4/20/2015 3:57:22 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/20/2015 3:57:22 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1447 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to equalize the Federal 

medical assistance percentage applicable to certain individuals in the 

expansion population of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2019 

Mr. GROTHMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to equalize 

the Federal medical assistance percentage applicable to 

certain individuals in the expansion population of the 

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicaid Equality Act 

5 of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1447 IH

1 SEC. 2. EQUALIZING THE FEDERAL MEDICAL ASSISTANCE 

2 PERCENTAGE FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS IN 

3 THE EXPANSION POPULATION OF THE PA4 TIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE 

5 ACT. 

6 Section 1905 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 1396d) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (y)(1)— 

9 (A) in subparagraph (C), by adding ‘‘and’’ 

10 at the end; 

11 (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘; 

12 and’’ and inserting a period; and 

13 (C) by striking subparagraph (E); and 

14 (2) in subsection (z)(2)— 

15 (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting 

16 ‘‘(through 2019)’’ after ‘‘thereafter’’; and 

17 (B) in subparagraph (B)(ii)(VI), by strik18 ing ‘‘and each subsequent year’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS