All rules submitte

p

be supported by certain information and documentation for the rule packages to

be deemed complete for review by the EPA. Rules will not be evaluated for

approvability by the EPA unless the submittal packages are complete. To assist

you in determining that all necessary materials are included in rule packages

sent to the ARB for submittal to the EPA, please fill out the following form and

include it with the rule package you send us. See the ARB’s Guidelines on the

Imolementation of the EPA’s Draft SIP Comoleteness Policy, October 1989, for a

more detailed explanation than is provided here.

DISTRICT

RULE NO. Z2 DATE A9J.E11OR AMENDED

RULE TITLE ,4/44,k’t ,‘1i,—

*

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

(4 ( ) ( ) COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE: Provide an unmarked copy of the entire rule as adopted or amended by your District Board.( ) ( ) (v UNDERLINE AND STRIKEOUT COPY OF THE RULE: If an amended rule, provide a complete copy of the rule indicating in udrlin-c..Z7?flC

and strikeout format all language which has been added,

deleted, or changed since the rule was last adopted or

amended.

(4 ( ) ( ) COMPLETE COPY OF REFERENCED RULE(S): For any rule which includes language specifically referencing another rule, a

copy of that other rule must also be submitted, unless it has

already been submitted to EPA as a part of a previous SIP submittal.

(‘4 ( ) ( ) PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE: Include a copy of the local newspaper clipping certification(s), stating the date of publication,

which must be at least 30 days before the hearing. As an

alternative, include a copy of the actual published notice of

the public hearing as it appeared in the local newspaper(s).

In this -case, however, enough of the newspaper page must be

included to show the date of publication. The notice must

specifically identify by title. and number each rule adopted

or amended.

* Attach a separate sheet for each rule explaining why any materials are not

included and when they will be submitted to the ARB.
( ) ( ) 

• comments made during the notice period and at the public

hearing. Also submit any written responses prepared by the

District staff or presented to the District Board at the

public hearing.

A summary of the public comments and

responses is adequate. If there were no comments made during

the notice period or at the hearing, please indicate N/A tothe left.

TECHNICAL MATERIALS

(.—( ( ) ( ) RULE EVALUATION FORM: See instructions for completing the Rule V Evaluation Form and the accompanying sample form.

( ) ( ) (, NON-EPA TEST METHOD: Include all test methods referenced in the rule, but not previously submitted to EPA. Provide an

explanation of the purpose and principle for the test method

and include the following supporting technical data:

describe the test details (number of tests to be carried out,

their precision, accuracy, and repeatability); on a technical_

basis, compare the method with the appropriate EPA/ASTM

method; explain the technical differences of the two methods

and how they affect monitoring of the parameters of interest;

explain how the test method affects the implementation and

enforcement of the applicable rule; explain the advantages

and any potential shortcomings of the test method.

( ) ( ) MODELING SUPPORT: Provide if appropriate; in general modeling support is not required for VOC and NOx rules to determine

their impacts on ozone levels. Modeling is required where a

rule is a relaxation that affects large sources (.?l00 TPY) in

an attainment area for S02, directly emitted PM1O, CO, or NOx

(for N02 purposes). In cases where EPA is concerned with the

impact on air quality of rule revisions which relax limits or

cause a shift in

emissions

patterns in a nonattainment area,

a reference back to the approved SIP will be sufficient

provided the approved SIP used the current EPA modeling V guidelines. If current EPA modeling guidelines were not

used, then new modeling may be required.

C ) C ) (r ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS FROM EPA POLICIES: -As appropriate, describe special circumstances,

i.e., where alternative RACT is used, extended compliance

dates are included, etc.

A completed SIP Aoprovability V Checklist-Enforceability will fulfill this requirement.

(y’( ( ) ( ) ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: Provide any other supporting information V concerning development of the rule or rule changes, such as

staff reports.

RES Revised 3/93
o 0

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

• APCD I AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 1

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: /4’4 Rule No.:

_____________

Date Aqpted or Amended: 

Rule Title: Z2& ,c’i,i— a’c’- (A4)

Date Submitted to ARB: ./5/’9I— If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): 

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? (‘—rYes ( ) No If NO, do not comp

District Contact: ) y,t..-€rCO Phone No.: (ii)

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: (X) New Rule ( ) Amended Rule

1ty77t

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROG NOx S02 PM1O CO TAC (name): /r’fz1s

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach relorence(s) for emission fa

information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emissions information provided below was determined.

Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase ( ) Decrease (4 N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category:

___________________

tons/year

SCCICES Code Affected: • If a SCC Code is Assigneà, SIC Code Affected:

__

(NOTE: If more than one SOC or CES code or more than one combination of SCC and SIC codes are needed, fill out the following information on 

each combination of codes.)

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: ,v/,z Area Affected:

_________________

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible.):

Tons/year Baseline

Reductions Tons/year Control Percent Con

Year (Increases) Subject to Rule Level Control Le

_____ ______

/

______ ______

* 100 =

______

% 1.00—

* 100=

____

% 1.00—

____ ______

I

______ _____

* 100 =

______

% 1.00—

___ ____

/

____ ____

* 100=

____

% 1.00—
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD / AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2

lii. SOURCES I ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: (4’ Attainment ( ) Nonattainment ( ) Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: 4rPercent In Nonattainment Area: C %

Number of Large ( 100 TPY) Sources Controlled:

_____________

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additio

Z j/éi J;: # Z/j’71-’

IV. EMISSiON REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? ( ) Yes ()No

If Yes, Those Limits are In Section (s)

___________________________

of the rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are:

4Z/i’9

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s):

__________________

Work Practice Standards in Section(s):

_______

Recordkeeping Requirements In Section(s):

_____________

Reporting Requirements in Section(s):

_

Attach a Completed EPA SIP Approvability Checklist - Enforceability or Provide an Equivalent Complia

Strategy Statement.

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

M No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainment

Discussion: ,4 ,i46AW7
JPJ’OVThTTf qlJ-ljflCJJTv

SIP Package No.

_______________-

Date flec. Late Due -

Cubect Hatler: -M4’c ‘E-t’’-/ -

7’ivirn2iV /14

lspçclflu Provlslon and DecrIp1lon

porceabflv1malyaJ8 sjaJn AflIta) CPA Irtineq 

I}Jnt rezqxniseaj -

1. AWlIcabiiity 7jE7-4/177D4/

a. Ial sourcee are being Clarity regulated?

b. Miat are criterie for Clarity exeqtlon7

c. Is calculation brantple calculation or procedure for en*ptIon clear explanation of clearly upeclfled7 how to determine

exemption fine by line, etc.)

d. Is emission inventory Inventory Inclutling hated in the ‘‘ allowable anclactirni besckgroun document eiilsslons In source of the.attainment category should be denicwwtrat ion? Included, for enforce—

nit pnrtoses and

Independent of any Chnn

Air Act recpiire,nents, in the attainment demon

stratton If such data is

necessary for deter,idn. Ing baselines in reçjula Lions.
nrorcethIqv AaJj

e. I. the averaging the(s)

used in the ride differ—

eviL 1rpm that of the

aeblent atmidard?

f. Nhat are the nnlts of

oa.pllance (The Voc per gaflon of solids

applied less water,.

grains per atandard

cubh, foot?)

g. is bi*bllng or everag

Ing of any type

alIoied? If yes,

state criteria.

Could a U.S. £PA

Inspector lndepenently

determine If the

criteria kere Met? Does

PA have to approve

each case?

State_SubmHtal

iV/q

The isveraqlij t1n. lii the

rule must be consistent

with protecting the athlent

standard in stion.

Pormally, it should be eqdal

to or shorter than the

h*e eusociated with the

standard. Longer term

averaging Is available

oniy• in Ilmiteil Instances

provided that the athient

standard Is not compromised.

Clearly stated In the

rule

Eiipllcft description of

how averaging, butblIn,

or equivalency is to he

determtrWd W’c

cauIvalenc,’ vmjst be On

a ‘solid. applied”

basis. Miy method anist

be in4eptnOnt)y re

producible. Provision

must be explicit as to

whether rP) case-by—

case approval recjiilred.

If provision Intended

to be “generic’ then CP

buthle poHcy 1RIst be

met.

Au rovab(lIL
h U there Is a redeslcjna—

tion, will tide change

the emIssIon limita—

tionWI 1! yes, which

ones ani how?

2. Cciiplince Dates

ft. What is compliance date?

b. Iat is the attainment

date?

3. SpecifIcity of Conduct

a. 1haL teat method Is

required?

b. nat Is the averagtnq tlee In compliance

test rnithod?

C. Is a Cçfnpllance calct1at Ion or

evahiation recjul red?

(I.e., dilly weighted

average for VOCI.

d. If yea to list

the formula, period of

- u(il1ftnce • aiid/or

FJ.k 1uir cinent

Regulation may not

automatically allow for

self imilif Scat inn upon

rerlesignatlon ol area

to attalnuent. lieu

maintenance denxnstra

tion rep.ilred In order

to drop reciulatton.

Hunt not be later than

approved or about to

be approved date of

attainment unless

emission rediict ions not

necessary for atLaS ii

mnent. In some cases

It will be neceory for the retjulatlon to

pecI[y dates In compli

ance schedules that are

reguired to be subnltted

by source to state.

Test method must be

explicitly stated.

MPeraglng t line all)

appl ical Lop of limit

must be el(phIclt.

rormula musi. I).?

explicit.

0. En!orcethllltv Iinalvslo !ta1e Submittal

jpprovabiHty (

“/4-

v4
rorabi)liv iina)yula.

4. IncorporatIon by fleference

a. lihat Is atite authority

for rulemakli7

b. Are methods/rules

lncórporaied by

reference In the

right manner.

5, Recordkeeplng

a. Ithat recorclr. are

re2lted to determine

ccirplfance7

b. In iat form or un1t

(Tha/ga), gr/dsc,

etc.) u*ist the

records be kept? On

ihat time basis

(hwtanianeous1P,

hourly, daily)?

c rxeo the rule affirm

atively reoiilre the

records be kept?

Records to be kept

must be consistent

with units of

compliunce In the per—

lormance rciiil remenis,

Inc)udji..tbe app)!—

cable time period.

There must be a clear

ueparatel9 enforceable

provision that requires

records to he kept.

sIhte ubinIIta) £1’1 fteaolremen) A,)proviproy

(e

11e9

/V/,9-

Al/A

Ii,

Clarity

0
JorcbflItY i4vais - State b,nItt& - EPA flççiIreinent ApprovkilHtYtPPrO

xeinptIona

a. iJat any exemptions )J//i Ikuit be clearly deilned

allowed. and ditIngutshable from

what constitutes a b. In the criteria for violation:

applIcatIon clear?

7. PaLfunct ion Provlijloris J%J Mule mUst specify what

exceedancea may be

excused, how the

standard Is to be

applied, and 4o makes

the determination.