alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of - )

)

Halbert Construction Company, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 62250, 62251

)

Under Contract No. W912PL-10-D-0114 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Jason R. Thornton, Esq.

 Finch, Thornton & Baird, LLP

 San Diego, CA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Mary K. Wrightson, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorney

 U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE WILSON

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter 

judgment in favor of appellant.

It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeals are sustained. In the nature of a 

consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of

$550,000. This amount is inclusive of Contract Disputes Act interest. No further 

interest shall be paid. 

Dated: July 27, 2023 

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

(Signatures continued)
2

I concur

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 62250, 62251, Appeals of 

Halbert Construction Company, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 27, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
# C_2016202EN.01013901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/139 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/139

---

Article 206

(ex Article 131 TEC)

(ex Article 131 TEC)

By establishing a customs union in accordance with Articles 28 to 32, the Union shall contribute, in the common interest, to the harmonious development of world trade, the progressive abolition of restrictions on international trade and on foreign direct investment, and the lowering of customs and other barriers.

---
3

£o.&^ U308 CcrPftoL Slirrk/i

aVjaiiW &xXson. ucWM

X uWi UfaL -b ostc ^.i. f*/Y of -rkz

0^ -rL Cfiutr-H-^^ /Weal5 deS&hAa o± **/ H.C/1.07.

7L rix> Ps^CiV tr^J ?P Z LuP &r*L~ uXw\c Cod) &/L

"V ( T ^o Ab+ nW> 7/* //*>7 o^i/Y dU* £W«-J

ita Giu*e <\Wbercr. Uv^ S)3X 5£5d8>v/ S83&7.*

iSzs f/n -766

77754 4~l*'(*

GOUBT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 20 2015

AbsSAcosta,Clerk
# C_2016202EN.01016901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/169 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/169

---

Article 286

(ex Article 247 TEC)

(ex Article 247 TEC)

1.   The Members of the Court of Auditors shall be chosen from among persons who belong or have belonged in their respective States to external audit bodies or who are especially qualified for this office. Their independence must be beyond doubt.

2.   The Members of the Court of Auditors shall be appointed for a term of six years. The Council, after consulting the European Parliament, shall adopt the list of Members drawn up in accordance with the proposals made by each Member State. The term of office of the Members of the Court of Auditors shall be renewable.

They shall elect the President of the Court of Auditors from among their number for a term of three years. The President may be re-elected.

3.   In the performance of these duties, the Members of the Court of Auditors shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government or from any other body. The Members of the Court of Auditors shall refrain from any action incompatible with their duties.

4.   The Members of the Court of Auditors may not, during their term of office, engage in any other occupation, whether gainful or not. When entering upon their duties they shall give a solemn undertaking that, both during and after their term of office, they will respect the obligations arising therefrom and in particular their duty to behave with integrity and discretion as regards the acceptance, after they have ceased to hold office, of certain appointments or benefits.

5.   Apart from normal replacement, or death, the duties of a Member of the Court of Auditors shall end when he resigns, or is compulsorily retired by a ruling of the Court of Justice pursuant to paragraph 6.

The vacancy thus caused shall be filled for the remainder of the Member's term of office.

Save in the case of compulsory retirement, Members of the Court of Auditors shall remain in office until they have been replaced.

6.   A Member of the Court of Auditors may be deprived of his office or of his right to a pension or other benefits in its stead only if the Court of Justice, at the request of the Court of Auditors, finds that he no longer fulfils the requisite conditions or meets the obligations arising from his office.

7.   The Council shall determine the conditions of employment of the President and the Members of the Court of Auditors and in particular their salaries, allowances and pensions. It shall also determine any payment to be made instead of remuneration.

8.   The provisions of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union applicable to the Judges of the Court of Justice of the European Union shall also apply to the Members of the Court of Auditors.

---
#### John E. DENNETT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Karl POWERS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. 13904.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 29, 1975.

John E. Dennett, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert M. McRae, O. Robert Meredith, Salt Lake City, for defendants-respondents.

TUCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff filed his complaint on September 13, 1972. On June 10, 1974, the defend*136ants Karl Powers and Elsie Powers appeared specially by counsel and moved that the complaint be dismissed on the ground that the summons had not been timely served pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4(b), Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, which reads as follows:

> If an action is commenced by the filing of a complaint, summons must issue thereon within three months from the date of such filing. The summons must be served within one year after the filing of the complaint or the action will be deemed dismissed, provided that in any action brought against two or more defendants in which personal service has been obtained upon one of them within the year, the other or others may be served or appear at any time before trial.

At a hearing on September 23, 1974, the court ordered that the plaintiff file evidence of service of process by October 21, 1974. The purported return of service of summons upon Bill Boudreaux and Carolyn Boudreaux was filed with the clerk on October 22, 1974. The plaintiff not having complied with the prior order of the court, the complaint was deemed dismissed.

The rule above quoted pertaining to the time of issuance and the service of summons must be complied with or the action is deemed dismissed.1 On appeal the plaintiff does not contend that the summons was timely served, but he contends here that the defendants made a general appearance which gave the court jurisdiction. After a careful consideration of the plaintiff’s contentions in this regard, we find no merit in the plaintiff’s contentions.

The order of the district court dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint is affirmed. Respondents are entitled to costs.

ELLETT, CROCKETT and MAUGH-AN, JJ., concur.

HENRIOD, C. J., does not participate herein.

1

. Fibreboard Paper Prod. Corp. v. Dietrich, 25 Utah 2d 65, 475 P.2d 1005.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained earnings and
statement of cash flows contained in Form 10-K of Cambridge Electric Light
Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016573
<NAME> CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          100,965
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          9,854
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              23,660
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            72,642
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     207,121
<COMMON>                             8,665
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           27,953
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 11,607
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      48,225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                17,402
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  30,290
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>          100
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     111,104
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      207,121
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          131,327
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 2,591
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         121,950
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         124,541
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>              6,786
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                   1,774
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>       8,560
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             3,344
<NET-INCOME>                         5,216
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>        5,216
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>             2,842
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            1,560
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>               5,985
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0



</TABLE>
M13003 

Part II, Section B – Industrial Sites Controlled by Others 

 a. Operation Description 

 b. Worker Exposure / Environmental Release 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 Certifications

I, Nikolai D. Klinchev, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-K of Chaparral Resources, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: March 15, 2004                         /s/ Nikolai D. Klinchev
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Nikolai D. Klinchev
                                             Chief Executive Officer
# C_2016202EN.01039701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/397 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/397

---

Article 16

Freedom to conduct a business

The freedom to conduct a business in accordance with Union law and national laws and practices is recognised.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of the registrant certifies, to the best of his or her
knowledge, that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Dated:  August 11, 2003                          /s/ Kenneth I. Moch
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Kenneth I. Moch
                                                 President and Chief Executive
                                                 Officer


Dated:  August 11, 2003                          /s/ Elizabeth A. O'Dell
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Elizabeth A. O'Dell
                                                 Vice President, Finance
                                                 Secretary and Treasurer
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF PEANUTS

FOR RELEASE AT 1:30 P.M. CT October 21, 2019

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of peanuts. The peanuts 

were sold under Peanut Invitation No. 11 dated October 9, 2019.

Catalog 

Lot Catalog Location Purchaser Tons Sold Bid Price (per ton) CCC Revenue Peanut Type

Lot #17 Blakely, GA Birdsong 6.57 $345.00 $ 2,266.65 Runner

Lot #19 Enterprise, AL Sessions Co. 1,221.53 $347.00 $ 423,870.91 Runner

Lot #20 Smithville, GA Olam Peanut 2,004.44 $355.00 $ 711,576.20 Runner

Lot #21 Smithville, GA Olam Peanut 2,013.69 $355.00 $ 714,859.95 Runner

Lot #22 Smithville, GA Olam Peanut 2,006.87 $355.00 $ 712,438.85 Runner

Lot #23 Smithville, GA Olam Peanut 2,002.54 $355.00 $ 710,901.70 Runner

Lot #24 Smithville, GA Olam Peanut 2,012.53 $355.00 $ 714,448.15 Runner

Lot #25 Smithville, GA Olam Peanut 2,003.23 $355.00 $ 711,146.65 Runner

Lot #26 Smithville, GA Olam Peanut 2,006.20 $355.00 $ 712,201.00 Runner

Lot #27 Smithville, GA Olam Peanut 2,006.88 $355.00 $ 712,442.40 Runner

Lot #28 Smithville, GA Olam Peanut 2,003.17 $355.00 $ 711,125.35 Runner

Lot #29 Smithville, GA Olam Peanut 2,002.06 $355.00 $ 710,731.30 Runner

Lot #30 Smithville, GA Olam Peanut 1,609.39 $355.00 $ 571,333.45 Runner

Lot #31 Trenton, FL Golden Peanut 75.39 $345.00 $ 26,009.55 Runner

Lot #33 Blakely, GA Birdsong 1,202.65 $345.00 $ 414,914.25 Runner

Lot #34 Brownfield, TX Birdsong 27.12 $325.00 $ 8,814.00 Spanish

Lot #35 Brownfield, TX Birdsong 2,146.75 $325.00 $ 697,693.75 Virginia

Lot #36 Brownfield, TX Birdsong 2,066.46 $325.00 $ 671,599.50 Virginia

Lot #37 Samson, AL Olam Peanut 2,008.47 $355.00 $ 713,006.85 Runner

Lot #38 Samson, AL Olam Peanut 2,016.60 $355.00 $ 715,893.00 Runner

Lot #39 Samson, AL Olam Peanut 1,562.82 $355.00 $ 554,801.10 Runner

Totals 34,005.36 $ 11,922,074.56
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants second fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Joseph F. Furlong, IIIJoseph F. Furlong, IIIChief Executive Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STEPHEN FISKE, ANDREW FISKE, and MAS LIQUIDATORS, LLC
, Appellant s ,

v.

MICHAEL SEDELSKY
, Appellee.

No. 4D 2 02 3

- 2830

[ April 11, 2024 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the C ircuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Carlos Augusto Rodriguez

, Judge; L.T.

Case No. CACE 23

- 940

.

Gary Murphree of AM Law, LLC, Miami, and Max G. Soren of Soren Law Group, PA, Miami Beach

, for appellant s

.

Phillip J. Sheehe and Johanna E. Sheehe of Sheehe & Associates, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

F ORST
, K UNTZ and A RTAU
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
- Sodium Lauryl Sulfate - Crops Part 1.pdf
- Sodium Lauryl Sulfate - Crops Part 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Robinson, Appellant.

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (Ceresia Jr., J.), rendered March 30, 1990, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, attempted burglary in the third degree (two counts), burglary in the second degree and petit larceny.

*780The People concur with defendant’s assertion that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support County Court’s order of restitution. We also agree. Apart from the victims’ statements, the record contains no evidence to support the assessment of damages and there was no evidence that defendant’s financial situation was considered in determining restitution. Despite these circumstances, no hearing was held and the court failed to set forth a payment schedule. Thus, there was a failure to comply with statutory procedures for determining restitution and the matter must be remitted for further proceedings in accordance with Penal Law §§ 60.27 and 65.10 *(see, People v Baker,*156 AD2d 766; *People v Credidio,*141 AD2d 661, *lv denied*72 NY2d 1044).

Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating that portion of the sentence which directed restitution; matter remitted to the County Court of Rensselaer County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court’s decision; and, as so modified, affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CertificationOf Periodic Report**

 

I,Kevin J. Reinhart, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NexenInc., a Canadian Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)       the Annual Report onForm 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

 

(2)       the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   February 20, 2009 | /s/ Kevin J. Reinhart |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                                     |                  | Kevin J. Reinhart |
|                                     |                  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.

 

1

----