alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**Certification**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Alteon Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
      such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2006 (the “Form
      10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
      in
      the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                August 14, 2006
            
            
            
            By:
            
            /s/
                Noah BerkowitzNoah
                Berkowitz, M.D., Ph.D.
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
              (principal
                executive officer)







Date:
                August 14, 2006
            
            
            
            By:
            
            /s/
                Jeffrey P. SteinJeffrey
                P. Stein, CPA
              (acting
                principal financial and accounting
                officer)







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                          WIRELESS TELECOM GROUP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                   (UNAUDITED)

                                                       For the Three Months
                                                          Ended March 31,
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                      2006             2005
                                                   -----------      -----------

Net Income                                         $ 1,016,505      $ 1,070,601
                                                   ===========      ===========

BASIC EARNINGS:

Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding                                      25,722,852       17,461,923
                                                   ===========      ===========

Basic earnings per common share                    $      0.04      $      0.06
                                                   ===========      ===========

DILUTED EARNINGS:

Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding                                      25,722,852       17,461,923
Assumed exercise of stock options                      131,224          183,320
                                                   -----------      -----------

Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding, as adjusted                         25,854,076       17,645,243
                                                   ===========      ===========

Diluted earnings per common share                  $      0.04      $      0.06
                                                   ===========      ===========
```
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

		NO. 2-05-048-CV

SOBECO, LLP D/B/A WRIGHT	APPELLANT

CUSTOM HOMES

	V.

KEN SAKIEWICZ, INDIVIDUALLY	APPELLEE

AND D/B/A EXPRESSION IN TILE

	------------

	FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss For Want Of Jurisdiction.”  Appellant has provided to this court a copy of a January 24, 2005 order granting a new trial in this case.  Accordingly, it is the court's opinion that appellant’s motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM	

PANEL D:	WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 3, 2005
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART ONE

PRINCIPLES

PRINCIPLES

TITLE II

PROVISIONS HAVING GENERAL APPLICATION

PROVISIONS HAVING GENERAL APPLICATION

Article 15

(ex Article 255 TEC)

(ex Article 255 TEC)

1.   In order to promote good governance and ensure the participation of civil society, the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall conduct their work as openly as possible.

2.   The European Parliament shall meet in public, as shall the Council when considering and voting on a draft legislative act.

3.   Any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, shall have a right of access to documents of the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, whatever their medium, subject to the principles and the conditions to be defined in accordance with this paragraph.

General principles and limits on grounds of public or private interest governing this right of access to documents shall be determined by the European Parliament and the Council, by means of regulations, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure.

Each institution, body, office or agency shall ensure that its proceedings are transparent and shall elaborate in its own Rules of Procedure specific provisions regarding access to its documents, in accordance with the regulations referred to in the second subparagraph.

The Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Central Bank and the European Investment Bank shall be subject to this paragraph only when exercising their administrative tasks.

The European Parliament and the Council shall ensure publication of the documents relating to the legislative procedures under the terms laid down by the regulations referred to in the second subparagraph.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for American Mortgage Acceptance Company and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000878774
<NAME> AMERICAN MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       9,123,463
<SECURITIES>                                41,671,953
<RECEIVABLES>                               69,966,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,322,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       65,868,891
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,453,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               121,322,167
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,702,240
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,075,939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,856,936
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,376,920
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,376,920
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        Sundaresan Raja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of the operations of the
        Company.
 
 /s/
        Sundaresan Raja
 Sundaresan
        Raja
 Principal
        Executive Officer
 
 May
        15,
        2007
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00092-CR

Armando Guerra Loya

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-1935-14-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 5, 2015
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

         VIEWCAST.COM, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2

         Section 12 of the ViewCast.com, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan is
hereby amended to read as follows:

         "12. (a) The maximum number of shares of the Company's Common Stock
which shall be made available for sale under the Plan shall be 1,000,000 shares,
subject to adjustment upon changes in capitalization of the Company as provided
in Section 18 hereof. If on a given Exercise Date the number of shares with
respect to which options are to be exercised exceeds the number of shares then
available under the Plan, the Company shall make a pro rata allocation of the
shares remaining available for purchase in as uniform a manner as shall be
practicable and as it shall determine to be equitable.

                  (b) The participant will have no interest or voting right in
shares covered by his option until such option has been exercised.

                  (c) Shares to be delivered to a participant under the Plan
will be registered in the name of the participant or in the name of the
participant and his or her spouse."
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HomePatient, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph F. Furlong, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

This Certification is executed as of November 2, 2004.

                       /s/ Joseph F. Furlong, III
                       --------------------------------
                       Joseph F. Furlong, III
                       Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2016202EN.01035701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/357 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/357

---

58.   Declaration by the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Hungary and the Republic of Malta on the spelling of the name of the single currency in the Treaties

Declaration by the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Hungary and the Republic of Malta on the spelling of the name of the single currency in the Treaties

Without prejudice to the unified spelling of the name of the single currency of the European Union referred to in the Treaties as displayed on the banknotes and on the coins, Latvia, Hungary and Malta declare that the spelling of the name of the single currency, including its derivatives as applied throughout the Latvian, Hungarian and Maltese text of the Treaties, has no effect on the existing rules of the Latvian, Hungarian or Maltese languages.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                             FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE
                         HORSESHOE GAMING HOLDING CORP.
                              EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

WHEREAS, the Corporation's Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Plan") restricts
the Corporation from issuing certain awards under the Equity Plan for less than
the fair market value of the security underlying the award at the time of grant;

WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to remove such restrictions on the issuance of
awards under the Equity Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Equity Plan shall hereby be amended as
follows:

        1.      Section 2(o) shall be amended and restated in its entirety to
                read: ""SAR" or "Common Stock Appreciation Right" means the
                right granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 6(d) to be
                paid an amount measured by the appreciation in the value of
                Common Stock from the date of grant as determined by the Board
                to the Fair Market Value at the date of exercise of the right,
                with payment to be made in cash, Common Stock or as specified in
                the Award, as determined by the Board."

        2.      Section 6(b)(i) shall be amended and restated in its entirety to
                read: "Exercise Price. The exercise price of each Option shall
                be determined by the Board at the time the Option is granted."

        3.      Section 6(d)(i) shall be amended and restated in its entirety to
                read: "Right to Payment. An SAR shall confer on the Participant
                to whom it is granted a right to receive, upon exercise thereof,
                the excess of (A) the Fair Market Value of one share of Common
                Stock on the date of exercise over (B) the grant price of the
                SAR as determined by the Board as of the date of grant of the
                SAR."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Corporation, by its duly authorized officer, has caused this
Amendment to be executed on this 14th day of November 2001.


                                       HORSESHOE GAMING HOLDING CORP.

                              By:      /s/ Dominic J. Polizzotto
                                       -----------------------------------------

                              Title:   Senior V.P./General Counsel
                                       -----------------------------------------
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

24.   Declaration concerning the legal personality of the European Union

Declaration concerning the legal personality of the European Union

The Conference confirms that the fact that the European Union has a legal personality will not in any way authorise the Union to legislate or to act beyond the competences conferred upon it by the Member States in the Treaties.

---
Exhibit 32.1

       Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                 of Title 18 of the United States Code


I, Joseph F. Kruy, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
Cambex Corporation, certify that

(i) This annual report on Form 10KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(ii) The information contained in this annual report on Form 10KSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Cambex Corporation.


Dated: March 30, 2007        /s/ Joseph F. Kruy
                             Joseph F. Kruy
                             President and Treasurer
                             [principal executive officer and
                              principal financial officer]


This certification accompanies this annual report pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 5

SECTION 5

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 254

(ex Article 224 TEC)

(ex Article 224 TEC)

The number of Judges of the General Court shall be determined by the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The Statute may provide for the General Court to be assisted by Advocates-General.

The members of the General Court shall be chosen from persons whose independence is beyond doubt and who possess the ability required for appointment to high judicial office. They shall be appointed by common accord of the governments of the Member States for a term of six years, after consultation of the panel provided for in Article 255. The membership shall be partially renewed every three years. Retiring members shall be eligible for reappointment.

The Judges shall elect the President of the General Court from among their number for a term of three years. He may be re-elected.

The General Court shall appoint its Registrar and lay down the rules governing his service.

The General Court shall establish its Rules of Procedure in agreement with the Court of Justice. Those Rules shall require the approval of the Council.

Unless the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union provides otherwise, the provisions of the Treaties relating to the Court of Justice shall apply to the General Court.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0418

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

RYAN CLINTON BLOOMER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 11, 2024 within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 2 2024

08/02/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0418
#### Ronald Eugene HANKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-78-354.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Nov. 15, 1979.

Robert A. Ravitz, Asst. Public Defender, Oklahoma County, for appellánt.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., David W. Lee, Asst. Atty. Gen., Brent S. Haynie, Legal Intern, for appellee.

OPINION

CORNISH, Presiding Judge:

The appellant, Ronald Eugene Hankins, was convicted of . the crime of Burglary in the Second Degree, After Former Conviction of a Felony in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Case No. CRF-77-3329, and received a sentence of ten (10) years.

The sole issue on appeal is whether error was committed when the trial court refused to submit the appellant’s requested instruction for the lesser included offense of Damaging or Tampering With a Vehicle, pursuant to 47 O.S.1971, § 4-104.

At approximately 12:30 p. m. on September 8, 1977, the appellant was discovered leaving an automobile. When he was stopped by the car’s owner, the appellant explained he was “getting something for a friend.” When the owner viewed the car to *1053ensure it was his car and not a neighbor’s car which looked similar, the appellant fled. A tape deck was partially removed from its bracket.

This Court has long held that an instruction on a lesser included offense need only be given when there is evidence that tends to prove the lesser included offense was committed. *Rogers v. State,*Okl.Cr., 583 P.2d 1104 (1978). See also *Harris v. State,*Okl.Cr., 291 P.2d 372 (1955). The instruction requested by the appellant hinges on the statement he made at the time he was discovered and confronted by the owner of the automobile. The explanation of the appellant for being in the car lacks credibility. He failed to produce any evidence on his behalf, and the statement, standing alone, was not sufficient to warrant the lesser included offense instruction.

The judgment and sentence is *AFFIRMED.*

BRETT and BUSSEY, JJ., concur.