### 42436 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air) The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR**  **TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120, E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15, 2014, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.
* * * * *

AGL OH D Columbus, Ohio State University Airport, OH [Amended] Columbus, Ohio State University Airport, OH

(Lat. 40 ° 04 ′47 ′′ N., long. 83 ° 04 ′ 23 ′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including 3,400 feet MSL within a 4-mile radius of Ohio State University Airport, excluding that airspace within the Port Columbus International Airport, OH, Class C airspace area. This Class D airspace area is effective during the specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective dates and times will thereafter be continuously published in the Airport/ Facility Directory.
Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated As A Surface Area.
* * * * *

AGL OH E4 Columbus, Ohio State University Airport, OH [Removed]
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.
* * * * *

AGL OH E5 Columbus, OH [Amended] Columbus, Port Columbus International Airport, OH (Lat. 39 ° 59 ′49 ′′ N., long. 82 ° 53 ′ 32 ′′ W.) Columbus, Rickenbacker International Airport, OH (Lat. 39 ° 48 ′ 50′′ N., long. 82 ° 55 ′40′′ W.) Columbus, Ohio State University Airport, OH

(Lat. 40 ° 04 ′47 ′′ N., long. 83 ° 04 ′ 23 ′′ W.) Columbus, Bolton Field Airport, OH

(Lat. 39 ° 54 ′04 ′′ N., long. 83 ° 08 ′ 13 ′′ W.) Columbus, Darby Dan Airport, OH

(Lat. 39 ° 56 ′ 31 ′′ N., long. 83 ° 12 ′ 18 ′′ W.) Lancaster, Fairfield County Airport, OH (Lat. 39 ° 45 ′ 20 ′′ N., long. 82 ° 39 ′ 26 ′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius of Port Columbus International Airport, and within 3.3 miles either side of the 094 ° bearing from Port Columbus International Airport extending from the 7-mile radius to 12.1 miles east of the airport, and within a 7-mile radius of Rickenbacker International Airport, and within 4 miles either side of the
045 ° bearing from Rickenbacker International Airport extending from the 7-mile radius to 12.5 miles northeast of the airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius of Ohio State University Airport, and within a 7.4-mile radius of Bolton Field Airport, and within a 6.4-mile radius of Fairfield County Airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius of Darby Dan Airport, excluding that airspace within the London, OH, Class E airspace area.

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on July 7, 2015. Robert W. Beck, Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015–17487 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2015–0842; Airspace Docket No. 15–ACE–2]** 

**Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace for the following Missouri**  **towns: Chillicothe, MO; Cuba, MO; Farmington, MO; Lamar, MO; Mountain**  **View, MO; Nevada, MO; and Poplar Bluff, MO** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

**SUMMARY :**  This action proposes to amend Class E airspace at Chillicothe Municipal Airport, Chillicothe, MO; Cuba Municipal Airport, Cuba, MO; Farmington Regional Airport, Farmington, MO; Lamar Municipal Airport, Lamar, MO; Mountain View Airport, Mountain View, MO; Nevada Municipal Airport, Nevada, MO; and Poplar Bluff Municipal Airport, PoplarBluff, MO. Decommissioning of the nondirectional radio beacons (NDB) and/or cancellation of NDB approaches due to advances in Global Positioning System (GPS) capabilities has made this action necessary for the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the above airports. Geographic coordinates are also adjusted at Lamar Municipal Airport, Lamar, MO; and Nevada Municipal Airport, Nevada, MO. **DATES :**  0901 UTC. Comments must be received on or before August 31, 2015.

**ADDRESSES :**  Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC. 20590–0001. You must identify the docket number FAA–2015– 0842/Airspace Docket No. 15–ACE–2, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1–800– 647–5527), is on the ground floor of the building at the above address.

FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air

_ traffic/ publications/. The Order is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to http:// www.archives.gov/federal

_register/ code

_ of

_ federal-regulations/ibr

_ locations.html.

FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is published yearly and effective on September 15. For further information, you can contact the Airspace Policy and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, 20591; telephone: 202–267–8783.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Roger Waite, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone: (817) 321–
7652.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Authority for This Rulemaking

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the


### 42437 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it would amend controlled airspace at the Missouri airports listed in this NPRM.

Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal. Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ‘‘Comments to Docket No. FAA–2015–0842/Airspace Docket No. 15–ACE–2.’’ The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs

An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA’s Web page at http:// www.faa.gov/airports

_airtraffic/air

_ traffic/publications/airspace

_ amendments/.

You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office (see

**ADDRESSES** section for address and phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at the office of the Central Service Center, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137.

Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future NPRMs should contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking (202) 267–9677, to request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application procedure. Availability and Summary of Documents Proposed for Incorporation by Reference

This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15, 2014. FAA Order 7400.9Y is publicly available as listed in the **ADDRESSES** section of this proposed rule. FAA Order 7400.9Y lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting points. The Proposal

This action proposes to amend Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), Part 71 by modifying Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface for standard instrument approach procedures (SIAP) at Chillicothe Municipal Airport, Chillicothe, MO; Cuba Municipal Airport, Cuba, MO; Farmington Regional Airport, Farmington, MO; Lamar Municipal Airport, Lamar, MO; Mountain View Airport, Mountain View, MO; Nevada Municipal Airport, Nevada, MO; and Poplar Bluff Municipal Airport, Poplar Bluff, MO. Also, Class E airspace extending upward from the surface would be amended at Farmington Regional Airport, Farmington, MO. Airspace reconfiguration is necessary due to the decommissioning of NDBs and/or cancellation of the NDB approach at each airport. Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and management of IFR operations for SIAPs at the airports. Geographic coordinates also would be adjusted for Lamar Municipal Airport, Lamar, MO; Nevada Municipal Airport, Nevada, MO; and Poplar Bluff Municipal Airport, Poplar Bluff, MO, to coincide with the FAAs aeronautical database.

Class E airspace areas are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9Y, dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15, 2014, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designation listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order. Regulatory Notices and Analyses

The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final regulatory action. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air) The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR**  **TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15, 2014, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas
* * * * *
ACE MO E2 Farmington, MO [Amended] Farmington Regional Airport, MO

(Lat. 37 ° 45 ′40 ′′ N., long. 90 ° 25 ′43 ′′ W.) Within a 3.9-mile radius of Farmington Regional Airport and within 1.7 miles each side of the 202 ° bearing from the airport extending from the 3.9-mile radius to 4 miles south of the airport.
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth.
* * * * *

ACE MO E5 Chillicothe, MO [Amended] Chillicothe Municipal Airport, MO

(Lat. 39 ° 46 ′ 56 ′′ N., long. 93 ° 29 ′44 ′′ W.)


### 42438 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules

That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.9-mile radius of Chillicothe Municipal Airport.

* * * * *

ACE MO E5 Cuba, MO [Amended] Cuba Municipal Airport, MO

(Lat. 38 ° 04 ′08 ′′ N., long. 91 ° 25 ′44 ′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile radius of the Cuba Municipal Airport.

* * * * *
ACE MO E5 Farmington, MO [Amended] Farmington Regional Airport, MO

(Lat. 37 ° 45 ′40′′ N., long. 90 ° 25 ′43 ′′ W.) Farmington VORTAC

(Lat. 37 ° 40 ′ 24 ′′ N., long. 90 ° 14 ′03 ′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile radius of Farmington Regional Airport, and within 4 miles each side of the 204 ° bearing from the airport extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 11.5 miles southwest of the airport, and within 1.3 miles each side of the Farmington VORTAC 300 ° radial extending from the 6.4-mile radius of the airport to the
VORTAC.
* * * * *

ACE MO E5 Lamar, MO [Amended] Lamar Municipal Airport, MO

(Lat. 37 ° 29 ′ 10′′ N., long. 94 ° 18 ′43 ′′W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile radius of Lamar Municipal Airport.

* * * * *

ACE MO E5 Mountain View, MO [Amended] Mountain View Airport, MO

(Lat. 36 ° 59 ′ 34 ′′ N., long. 91 ° 42 ′ 52 ′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile radius of Mountain View Airport.

* * * * *

ACE MO E5 Nevada, MO [Amended] Nevada Municipal Airport, MO

(Lat. 37 ° 51 ′09 ′′ N., long. 94 ° 18 ′ 17 ′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile radius of Nevada Municipal Airport.

* * * * *
ACE MO E5 Poplar Bluff, MO [Amended] Poplar Bluff Municipal Airport, MO

(Lat. 36 ° 46 ′ 26 ′′ N., long. 90 ° 19’30′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile radius of Poplar Bluff Municipal Airport.

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on July 7, 2015
Robert W. Beck Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015–17501 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY**  **COMMISSION**

**16 CFR Part 1251**

**[Docket No. CPSC–2011–0081]**

**Toys: Determination Regarding Heavy Elements Limits for Unfinished and**  **Untreated Wood**

**AGENCY :**  U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking.

**SUMMARY :**  The Consumer Product Safety Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘CPSC’’) is proposing to determine that unfinished and untreated trunk wood does not contain heavy elements that would exceed the limits specified in the Commission’s toy standard, ASTM F963–11. Based on this proposed determination, unfinished and untreated trunk wood in toys would not require third party testing. In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this Federal Register, the Commission is issuing this determination as a direct final rule. If we receive no significant adverse comment in response to the direct final rule, we will not take further action on this proposed rule.

**DATES :**  Submit comments by August 17,
2015.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC–2011– 0081, by any of the following methods:

Electronic Submissions: Submit electronic comments to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at: www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. The Commission does not accept comments submitted by electronic mail (email), except through www.regulations.gov. The Commission encourages you to submit electronic comments by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as described above.

Written Submissions: Submit written submissions by mail/hand delivery/ courier to: Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301)
504–7923.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this notice. All comments received may be posted without change, including any personal identifiers, contact information, or other personal information provided, to: www.regulations.gov. Do not submit confidential business information, trade secret information, or other sensitive or protected information that you do not want to be available to the public. If furnished at all, such information should be submitted in writing.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to: www.regulations.gov, and insert the docket number CPSC–2011–0081, into the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the prompts.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Randy Butturini, Project Manager, Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Hwy, Room 814, Bethesda, MD 20814; 301–504–7562: email; rbutturini@
cpsc.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Along with this proposed rule, CPSC is publishing a direct final rule in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this issue of the Federal Register. This direct final rule establishes a determination that unfinished and untreated trunk wood does not contain heavy elements that would exceed the heavy elements limits specified in the Commission’s mandatory toy standard, ASTM F963– 11. Based on this determination, unfinished and untreated trunk wood in toys does not require third party testing. CPSC did not issue a proposed rule before today because CPSC believes that this action is not controversial and CPSC does not expect significant adverse comment. CPSC has explained the reasons for the determination in the direct final rule. Unless CPSC receives significant adverse comment regarding the determination during the comment period, the direct final rule in this issue of the Federal Register will become effective September 15, 2015, and CPSC will not take further action on this proposal. If CPSC receives a significant adverse comment, CPSC will publish a document in the Federal Register withdrawing the direct final rule, and the rule will not take effect. CPSC will then respond to public comments in a later final rule, based on this proposed rule. CPSC does not intend to institute a second comment period on this action. Parties interested in commenting on this determination must do so at this time. For additional information, please see the direct final rule published in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this issue of the Federal Register

.

Dated: July 13, 2015. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–17414 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6355–01–P**