alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Long Island Medical Transportation Association, Inc., Appellant, v Ruth A. Brandwein et al., Respondents.

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services, dated October 2, 1989, reducing the reimbursement rates paid to Medicaid transportation providers by 10% and a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated October 12, 1989, approving the reduction, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hand, J.), dated January 23, 1990, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The petitioner Long Island Medical Transportation Association, Inc., an association of ambulance and ambulette companies, challenges a determination of the Commissioner of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services (hereinafter the Suffolk DSS) which reduced by 10% the State reimbursement rate for transportation services provided to Medicaid recipi*623ents pursuant to 18 NYCRR 505.10 (c) (1), and the approval of the rate reduction by the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services.

The clear language of 18 NYCRR 505.10 (c) (1), read together with the Medicaid Management Information System Manual § 2.2.7, authorizes the Suffolk DSS either to "negotiate” the rates with transportation providers or to set the rate at the local prevailing charge. In fact, the Medicaid Management Information System Manual clearly provides that the rates to be paid to medical transportation providers may be negotiated or be the local prevailing charge "as determined by” the Suffolk DSS. Thus, whether to negotiate a rate or to determine the prevailing rate on its own, is a matter of discretion for the Suffolk DSS. Here, the record shows that the reduced rate was comparable to that provided by neighboring Nassau County. Moreover, the reduction at issue came at a time when Suffolk County was experiencing "severe fiscal strain” and, as a result, had reduced its contracts with other service agencies by 10%.

Thus, we find that the Suffolk DSS acted properly in reducing the reimbursement rate and, accordingly, the proceeding was properly dismissed.

We are aware of decisions rendered by the Appellate Division, First Department, in *Ambulance Assn. v Grinker*(165 AD2d 791, *lv denied*76 NY2d 714) and the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ain, J.) in *Matter of Independent Transporters of Handicapped v Brandwein*(Aug. 7, 1990) and, to the extent that they are contrary to the result reached here, decline to follow them. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Consumer and Marketing Service 

Fruit and Vegetable Division 

Processed Products Standardization 

and Inspection Branch 

A-399 

(Supersedes A-382 

-- FOR USE OF USDA -­ on this subject) 

:PROCESSED FOOD INSPECTORS: June, 1966 

TO: All Processed Food Inspectors 

FROM: Fred Dunn, Chief of the Branch 

SUBJECT: "Fused-rings" in Frozen Onion Rings 

FILE UNDER: United States Standards for Grades of 

Frozen Breaded Onion Rings 

. I PURPOSE 

This provides an interpretative guide when rings are fused 

together during the frying operation and are found in the 

frozen product. 

II EXPLANATION 

The grade standards provide for specific tolerances for 

imperfect rings which includes rings that are extremely 

irregular in shape. Since fused rings (two or more cooked 

together with batter). may not be extremely irregular and 

thereby scoreable as "imperfect rings", the allowance that 

follows may be used as a guide, 

Grade A Grade B 

Allow l set of fused rings per Allow 2 sets of fused rings 

12 ounces, on an average, of per 12 ounces, on an average, 

product net .weight if the of product net weight if the 

appearance is not materially appearance is not seriously 

affected. affected, 

Distribution: A 

Agriculture - Washington
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than January 25, 2013.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *The Donald L. Patry Revocable Trust; Ellen M. Patry Revocable Trust, and Ellen Patry, trustee, all of Newton, Kansas; Corey Patry, Wichita, Kansas; Brandon Patry, and Katie Patry,*                     both of Valley Center, Kansas, as a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of Whitewater Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Bank of Whitewater, both in Whitewater, Kansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 7, 2013.

Margaret McCloskey Shanks,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2013-00331 Filed 1-9-13; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 4

SECTION 4

THE COMMISSION

Article 247

(ex Article 216 TEC)

(ex Article 216 TEC)

If any Member of the Commission no longer fulfils the conditions required for the performance of his duties or if he has been guilty of serious misconduct, the Court of Justice may, on application by the Council acting by a simple majority or the Commission, compulsorily retire him.

---
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

July 25, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-10678

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-80124-CR-WJZ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

BRANDON CONNORS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(July 25, 2006)

Before BLACK, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Kathleen Williams, appointed counsel for Brandon Connors in this direct
2

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Connors’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.
# C_2016202EN.01015701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/157 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/157

---

Article 251

(ex Article 221 TEC)

(ex Article 221 TEC)

The Court of Justice shall sit in chambers or in a Grand Chamber, in accordance with the rules laid down for that purpose in the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

When provided for in the Statute, the Court of Justice may also sit as a full Court.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 141 (Friday, July 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43142-43143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18084]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

[ Document No. AMS-FV-09-0049; FV-09-329]

United States Standards for Grades of Refried Beans

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is withdrawing a 
notice soliciting comments on the possible establishment of voluntary 
United States Standards for Grades of Refried Beans. After reviewing 
and considering industry input, the Agency has decided not to proceed 
further with this action.

DATES: Effective Date: July 23, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lydia E. Berry, Inspection and 
Standardization Section, Processed Products Branch (PPB), Fruit and 
Vegetable Programs (FV), AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 
0709, South Building; STOP 0247, Washington, DC 20250; phone: (202) 
720-5021; fax: (202) 690-1527.

Background

    A trade association representing the processed food industry 
requested that USDA develop grade standards for canned refried beans to 
be used by the industry. AMS prepared a discussion draft of the 
proposed canned refried beans standards using information provided by 
the petitioner, and distributed copies to the trade association's 
members for comments. Input from the trade association's members was 
used to further develop the proposed grade standards.
    Prior to undertaking additional research and other work associated 
with the establishment of official standards, a notice was published at 
69 FR 40857 in the Federal Register soliciting comments on the proposed 
establishment of voluntary grade standards for canned refried beans. 
One comment was received from a food manufacturer as a result of that 
request. A copy of the comment is posted at http://www.regulations.gov 
and on the AMS Web site at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/processedinspection.
    The commenter favored the development of the grade standards if AMS 
increased its scope to include dehydrated refried beans. AMS then 
discussed the proposed expansion of the standards to include the 
dehydrated refried beans with the original petitioner, the National 
Food Processors Association, now known as the Grocery Manufacturers 
Association (GMA). The GMA informed AMS that the association no longer 
supported development of any standards for refried beans. One company 
still expressed interest in development of the grade standards or 
refried beans. However, additional input from the company was not 
forthcoming.

[[Page 43143]]

    Given these circumstances, AMS will not proceed further with this 
action.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.

    Dated: July 20, 2010.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-18084 Filed 7-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
```
# C_2016202EN.01005601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/56

---

Article 18

(ex Article 12 TEC)

(ex Article 12 TEC)

Within the scope of application of the Treaties, and without prejudice to any special provisions contained therein, any discrimination on grounds of nationality shall be prohibited.

The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, may adopt rules designed to prohibit such discrimination.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains restated summary financial information extracted from
the balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained earnings and
statement of cash flows contained in Form 10-K of Cambridge Electric Light
Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000016573
<NAME> CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>           99,311
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          9,229
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              19,774
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>             9,951
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     138,265
<COMMON>                             8,665
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           27,953
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                  7,561
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      44,179
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                41,865
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                   5,100
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>          160
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>      46,961
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      138,265
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          122,303
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 2,725
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         111,171
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         113,896
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>              8,407
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                   1,309
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>       9,716
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             4,278
<NET-INCOME>                         5,438
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>        5,438
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>             5,043
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            3,776
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>               9,058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0



</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1504 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to establish minimum 

notification requirements for voters affected by polling place changes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2019 

Mr. ALLRED (for himself, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, 

Ms. NORTON, Mr. CASTEN of Illinois, Mr. COHEN, and Mr. JOHNSON of 

Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to establish 

minimum notification requirements for voters affected 

by polling place changes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Know Your Polling 

5 Place Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1504 IH

1 SEC. 2. MINIMUM NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR VOT2 ERS AFFECTED BY POLLING PLACE 

3 CHANGES. 

4 (a) REQUIREMENTS.—Section 302 of the Help Amer5 ica Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 21082) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub7 section (e); and 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol9 lowing new subsection: 

10 ‘‘(d) MINIMUM NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR

11 VOTERS AFFECTED BY POLLING PLACE CHANGES.— 

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a State assigns an indi13 vidual who is a registered voter in a State to a poll14 ing place with respect to an election for Federal of15 fice which is not the same polling place to which the 

16 individual was previously assigned with respect to 

17 the most recent election for Federal office in the 

18 State in which the individual was eligible to vote— 

19 ‘‘(A) the State shall notify the individual of 

20 the location of the polling place not later than 

21 7 days before the date of the election; or 

22 ‘‘(B) if the State makes such an assign23 ment fewer than 7 days before the date of the 

24 election and the individual appears on the date 

25 of the election at the polling place to which the 

26 individual was previously assigned, the State 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1504 IH

1 shall make every reasonable effort to enable the 

2 individual to vote on the date of the election. 

3 ‘‘(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This subsection shall 

4 apply with respect to elections held on or after Janu5 ary 1, 2020.’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 302(e) of 

7 such Act (52 U.S.C. 21082(f)), as redesignated by sub8 section (a), is amended by striking ‘‘Each State’’ and in9 serting ‘‘Except as provided in subsection (d)(2), each 

10 State’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE III

AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES

AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES

Article 41

(ex Article 35 TEC)

(ex Article 35 TEC)

To enable the objectives set out in Article 39 to be attained, provision may be made within the framework of the common agricultural policy for measures such as:

| (a) | an effective coordination of efforts in the spheres of vocational training, of research and of the dissemination of agricultural knowledge; this may include joint financing of projects or institutions; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

an effective coordination of efforts in the spheres of vocational training, of research and of the dissemination of agricultural knowledge; this may include joint financing of projects or institutions;

| (b) | joint measures to promote consumption of certain products. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

joint measures to promote consumption of certain products.

---
Order entered September 5, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00951

- CV

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V.

HIGHWAY 205 FARMS, L TD ET AL

. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial C ourt Cause No. 84262CC



### O RDER

The Court has before it appellees’ September 1, 2013 unopposed motion for briefing

deadline extension. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellees to file their brief

by October 25, 2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS

JUSTI CE
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amendment to the Quarterly Report of American
HomePatient, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Marilyn O'Hara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

This Certification is executed as of April 29, 2003.



                                       /s/ Marilyn O'Hara
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Marilyn O'Hara
                                       Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20150

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALEJANDRO GAYTAN-MIRELES, also known as Alejandro Mirelles, also 

known as Alejandro Gaytan Mireles, also known as Alejandro Hernandez 

Mireles,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-357-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro GaytanMireles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gaytan-Mireles has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-20150 Document: 00513013137 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
No. 14-20150

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-20150 Document: 00513013137 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015