alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,775<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,401
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         153,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        121,933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,422
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,009
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,809
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,041)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.99
<FN>
<F1>Includes $930 of restricted cash.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1483 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1483

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the foreign 
 insurer excise tax certain insurance policies issued by United States 
                   territory and possession insurers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2019

Miss Gonzalez-Colon of Puerto Rico (for herself, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Mr. 
    King of New York, Mr. Fitzpatrick, and Mr. Soto) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the foreign 
 insurer excise tax certain insurance policies issued by United States 
                   territory and possession insurers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Puerto Rico Insurance Excise Tax 
Exemption Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN INSURANCE POLICIES ISSUED BY UNITED STATES TERRITORY 
              AND POSSESSION INSURERS EXEMPT FROM FOREIGN INSURER 
              EXCISE TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 4373 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Territories and possessions.--Any policy of 
        insurance, indemnity bond, annuity contract, or policy of 
        reinsurance issued by a partnership or corporation created or 
        organized under the laws of any territory or possession of the 
        United States, unless any of the hazards, risks, losses, or 
        liabilities covered thereby are covered by a policy of 
        reinsurance issued by a foreign insurer or reinsurer (other 
        than such a partnership or corporation).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to premiums paid after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Rachel Carson State Office Building

Post Office Box 8468

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105 - 8468

March 5, 1998

Bureau of Air Quality (717) 772-3934

Mr. Joseph R. Nardone

Sr. Environmental Engineer

Techneglas, Inc.

60 Old Boston Road

Pittston, PA 18640

Dear Mr. Nardone:

This letter is to inform you that the measured emission concentrations of 5, 9 and 8 ug are 

significantly below the required 33 to 66 ug catch requirement. 

According to 40 CFR, Part 63.344 (c)(2)(i) for determination of Chromium Emissions 

from Decorative and Hard Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing Operations utilizing 

California Air Resources Board (CARB) Method 425 and colorimetric analysis method. The 

requirement reads the sampling time and volume shall be sufficient to result in 33 to 66 

micrograms (ug) of catch in the sampling train. As a result, the final emission concentrations are 

not acceptable to the Department since the determination of accuracy can not be established.

Sincerely,

Robert Small

Air Pollution Control Engineer

Division of Source Testing and Monitoring

cc: Mr. Joseph O. Grau

Monarch Analytical Laboratories, Inc.

349 Tomahawk drive

Maumee, OH 43537
Mr. David Speicher - 2 - November 8, 1996

bcc: Karen Gee, Northeast Regional Office

Permit No. 40-318-031A

Reading File - Source Testing
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000879437
<NAME> INFOUSA INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          24,501
<SECURITIES>                                    19,046
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,029
<PP&E>                                          66,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 269,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,254
<BONDS>                                        127,098
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   269,070
<SALES>                                        172,528
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,773
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                866
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       866
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21


                 SUBSIDIARIES OF CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
                              AT DECEMBER 31, 1999


The following is a list of certain subsidiaries of Carolina Power & Light
Company and their respective states of incorporation:

Interpath Communications, Inc.                                North Carolina
                                                              Virginia

North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation                        Delaware

         Cape Fear Energy Corporation (1)                     North Carolina
         NCNG Cardinal Pipeline Investment Corporation (1)    North Carolina
         NCNG Energy Corporation (1)                          North Carolina
         NCNG Pine Needle Investment Corporation (1)          North Carolina


Strategic Resource Solutions Corp.                            North Carolina

         ACT Controls, Inc. (2)                               North Carolina
         Applied Computer Technologies Corp. (2)              Delaware
         Spectrum Controls, Inc. (2)                          North Carolina
         SRS Engineering Corp. (2)                            North Carolina


(1) Subsidiary of North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation.
(2) Subsidiary of Strategic Resource Solutions Corp.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

RONALD DAVIS,

Petitioner BelowAppellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION,

Respondent BelowAppellee.

§

§

§ No. 276, 2016

§

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. N16M-02-153

§

§

Submitted: November 4, 2016

Decided: January 3, 2017

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

This 3rd day of January 2017, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The appellant, Ronald Davis, filed this appeal from a Superior Court 

order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus for failure to pay the required 

$75 filing fee. On October 10, 2016, the Court issued a notice to Davis to show 

cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to diligently prosecute 

the appeal by failing to pay the Superior Court’s record preparation fee. 

(2) Davis responded to the rule to show cause on October 18, 2016, 

indicating that he had committed an unspecified error in the Superior Court and 
2

would like his case remanded back to the Superior Court so that he could rectify 

his error. Davis filed a motion to remand on November 4, 2016.

(3) Without more information, the Court finds no basis to remand this 

matter to the Superior Court. Moreover, in the absence of any reason why Davis 

has failed to pay the Superior Court record processing fee, this matter must be 

dismissed for Davis’s failure to prosecute his appeal in a diligent manner. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the within appeal is 

DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
1400 Independence Avenue, SW 

 Room 2530-S, STOP 0225

 Washington, D.C. 20250-0225

July 24, 2023

Mr. Mark Lamers, President

Lamers Dairy, Inc.

N410 Speel School Road

Appleton, Wisconsin 54915

Dear Mr. Lamers:

This letter is in reply to Lamers Dairy’s proposal submitted in response to a Request for 

Additional Proposals relating to the pricing provisions of the Federal milk marketing order 

(FMMO) program. USDA received Lamers Dairy’s proposal on June 13, 2023, seeking to 

increase the fluid milk sales monthly production limit on plants exempt from mandatory pooling 

to three million pounds.

The Secretary has determined the hearing will be limited in scope to amendments directly 

impacting the uniform pricing formulas of all FMMOs. USDA received several proposals that 

did not relate directly to the uniform FMMO pricing formulas and are beyond the scope of the 

upcoming rulemaking. Lamers Dairy proposal does not seek to amend the uniform FMMO 

pricing formulas. Accordingly, this proposal does not fall within the scope of this hearing and 

will not be heard at this time. Not including the proposal in this rulemaking proceeding does not 

prevent it from being offered for consideration in a separate rulemaking proceeding. 

Requirements for submitting a proposal are outlined in 7 CFR 900.22 at 

www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/DairyMarketingOrderAmendmentBrochure.pdf. 

A Hearing Notice has been published in the Federal Register announcing a hearing will convene 

at 9:00 a.m. ET on Wednesday, August 23, 2023, at 502 East Event Centre in Carmel, Indiana. 

We encourage Lamers Dairy to participate in the hearing Please refer to the Hearing website 

(www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/dairy/hearings/national-fmmo-pricing-hearing) for 

full information on how to participate. 

Thank you for your interest in the FMMO program.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dana H. Coale

Deputy Administrator

USDA-AMS-Dairy Program
# C_2016202EN.01012801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/128 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/128

---

Article 179

(ex Article 163 TEC)

(ex Article 163 TEC)

1.   The Union shall have the objective of strengthening its scientific and technological bases by achieving a European research area in which researchers, scientific knowledge and technology circulate freely, and encouraging it to become more competitive, including in its industry, while promoting all the research activities deemed necessary by virtue of other Chapters of the Treaties.

2.   For this purpose the Union shall, throughout the Union, encourage undertakings, including small and medium-sized undertakings, research centres and universities in their research and technological development activities of high quality; it shall support their efforts to cooperate with one another, aiming, notably, at permitting researchers to cooperate freely across borders and at enabling undertakings to exploit the internal market potential to the full, in particular through the opening-up of national public contracts, the definition of common standards and the removal of legal and fiscal obstacles to that cooperation.

3.   All Union activities under the Treaties in the area of research and technological development, including demonstration projects, shall be decided on and implemented in accordance with the provisions of this Title.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Timothy Sherlock, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ARI Network
         Services, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
         untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
         necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
         under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
         the period covered by this quarterly report; and

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this quarterly report.

Date: December 15, 2003

                                               By: /s/ Timothy Sherlock
                                                   ----------------------------
                                               By: Timothy Sherlock
                                               Title: Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
#### Michael Fitzsimmons, Appellant, v Sharon Aley, Also Known as Sharon Fitzsimmons, Respondent.

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on his first cause of action was *1022properly denied. At issue in this action is the ownership of the parties’ jointly owned property located at 4400 Shisler Road in Clarence, New York. The parties entered into a separation agreement which was incorporated into a judgment of divorce. When the separation agreement was executed, plaintiff resided in the Shisler Road property and defendant resided in the marital residence. Plaintiff, in asserting his right to sole ownership of the property, relies on a provision of the agreement which states that "each party shall own, free of any claim or right of the other, all of the items of property, real, personal and mixed, of any kind, nature or description and wheresoever situate, which are now in his or her name, control or possession, with full power to him or her to dispose of the same as fully and effectually in all respects and for all purposes as if unmarried.”

While we agree with plaintiff that the provision is clear and unambiguous, we reject his argument that it grants to him ownership of the Shisler Road property. By its terms, the provision cannot apply to jointly-owned real property. We thus conclude that plaintiff failed to show his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on his first cause of action *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]).

We note, however, that plaintiff’s second cause of action asserts a claim that the agreement makes no specific reference to the Shisler Road property because the parties were mutually mistaken in believing that plaintiff was the sole owner of the property. Although plaintiff’s moving papers included factual averments in support of that cause of action, he did not move for summary judgment thereon and defendant, therefore, was not required to submit evidentiary facts in opposition. Plaintiff should have the opportunity to move for summary judgment on his second cause of action, at which time defendant will be required to submit evidentiary proof in admissible form to refute plaintiff’s factual averments.

Finally, we conclude that the court did not err in dismissing plaintiff’s third cause of action for lack of specificity *(see,*CPLR 3016 [c]). The dismissal was without prejudice and plaintiff was granted leave to amend his pleading. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J.— Summary Judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
CAUSE NO. 03-15-00020-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE 3rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

HOUSTON, TEXAS 

___________________________ 

JAMES V. LONG, 

ONEWEST BANK, FSB. et al 

Appellee 

___________________________ 

On Appeal from the 126th Judicial District Court 

Travis County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-1 0-003483 

___________________________ 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

 1. This case is on appeal from the 126th Judicial District Court of Travis 

County, Texas in trial court cause number Trial Court Cause No. 2013-00767 

 2. The transcript was filed on February 18, 2015. Appellants brief was due 

March 20, 2015. 

 3. Appellant requests an extension of time of on month from the due date, 

i.e. until Monday, April 20, 2015. 

 4. No prior extension to file the brief has been received in this cause. 

5. The need for the extension is as follows. Appellant’s counsel is a solo 

practitioner. He had already prepared a draft response to the issues on appeal, but 

needed to incorporate the record and additional case sites, and to put it in the form 

required by the court. Counsel had regular clients experience unexpected complex 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00020-CV

4959347

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/20/2015 4:28:55 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/20/2015 4:28:55 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
criminal matters which required Counsel to act immediately to protect their 

interests. Counsel also had to prepare three complex motions and responses to 

summary judgment. This in addition to counsel’s normal case load prevented him 

from completing a full brief. Appellant moves for an extension to April 20, 2015.

WHEREFORE, Appellant prays that the court grant it an extension of time 

to file its brief and for such other and further relief as is just.

Respectfully submitted,

____/S/James D. Pierce_______________

JAMES D. PIERCE

State Bar No. 15994500

Comerica Bank Building

One Sugar Creek Center Blvd., Suite 1080

Sugar Land, Texas 77478-3560

(713) 650-0150 office

(713) 650-0146 facsimile

jim@jamespierce.com email

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The motion is unopposed.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

In compliance with Texas Rules of Appellant Civil Procedure, on April 1, 

2015, this pleading was served upon all parties and counsel of record

electronically.

_____/S/James D. Pierce_________________

JAMES D. PIERCE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

PATRICIA R. KALLA 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM INACTIVE STATUS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 20 DB 2015 (No. 32 RST 2015) 

Attorney Registration No. 50245 

(Out of State) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 21st day of April, 2015, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated April 9, 2015, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

Patricia R. Kalla, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or 

disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and 

learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, 

hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The 

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall 

be paid by the Petitioner.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.10.1    
  


 
 

Second Amendment of The Wet Seal, Inc.
  1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan    
  


        Section 5.1 is amended to delete the following words each time they appear therein "one million six hundred and fifty thousand (1,650,000)" and to replace
the deleted words with "two million six hundred and fifty thousand (2,650,000)". 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.10.1


Second Amendment of The Wet Seal, Inc. 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan
F.O. 5 Total Producer Milk and Number of Producers Pooled

Year # of Producers Pooled Total Producer Milk

00 6,667 6,317,807,748

01 6,485 6,673,304,698

02 6,039 6,706,404,276

03 5,376 6,314,715,438

04 4,826 6,202,493,443

05 4,369 6,399,812,315

06 4,580 6,242,970,524

07 4,064 5,865,023,397

08 4,038 5,882,201,759

09 3,996 5,950,397,772

10 4,124 6,041,773,553

11 3,937 6,128,146,669

12 3,137 5,862,598,329