alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 23187 

State citation Rule title State effective 

date 

EPA final rule 

date Final rule citation Comments 

*******

* * * * * (e) * * * 

Title/subject State effective 

date 

Notice of final 

rule date NFR citation 

(1) Statewide 

*******

Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Lead, 2008 8-hour Ozone, 

2010 NO2, 2010 SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards.

N/A 4/20/2016 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 

Infrastructure Requirements, Interstate Transport of Pollution 

110(a)(2)(D)(ii) for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.

N/A 4/20/2016 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 

Montana Code Annotated 2–2–121(2)(e) and 2–2–121(8) ....................... N/A 4/20/2016 [Insert Federal Register citation]. 

*******

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2016–08916 Filed 4–19–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 63 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0492; FRL–9945–34– 

OAR] 

RIN 2060–AR97 

Clarification of Requirements for 

Method 303 Certification Training 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: Because the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) received 

adverse comment, we are withdrawing 

the direct final rule for Clarification of 

Requirements for Method 303 

Certification Training, published on 

February 25, 2016. 

DATES: Effective April 20, 2016, the EPA 

withdraws the direct final rule 

published at 81 FR 9350, on February 

25, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Kim Garnett, U.S. EPA, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, Air 

Quality Assessment Division, 

Measurement Technology Group (Mail 

Code: E143–02), Research Triangle Park, 

NC 27711; telephone number: (919) 

541–1158; fax number: (919) 541–0516; 

email address: garnett.kim@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because 

the EPA received adverse comment, we 

are withdrawing the direct final rule for 

Clarification of Requirements for 

Method 303 Certification Training, 

published on February 25, 2016 (81 FR 

9350). We stated in that direct final rule 

that if we received adverse comment by 

March 28, 2016, the direct final rule 

would not take effect and we would 

publish a timely withdrawal in the 

Federal Register. We subsequently 

received adverse comment on that direct 

final rule. We will address those 

comments in any subsequent final 

action, which will be based on the 

parallel proposed rule also published on 

February 25, 2016 (81 FR 9407). As 

stated in the direct final rule and the 

parallel proposed rule, we will not 

institute a second comment period on 

this action. 

Dated: April 14, 2016. 

Janet G. McCabe, 

Acting Assistant Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2016–09157 Filed 4–19–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
ATTACHMENT B

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

AMENDMENTS TO RULE 67.4 – METAL CONTAINER, METAL 

CLOSURE, AND METAL COIL COATING OPERATIONS

STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

Prior to adopting, amending, or repealing a rule or regulation, California Health and Safety Code 

Section 40727 requires findings of necessity, authority, clarity, consistency, non-duplication, and 

reference. As part of the consistency finding to ensure proposed rule requirements do not 

conflict with or contradict other Air Pollution Control District (District) or federal regulations, 

Health and Safety Code Section 40727.2(a) requires the District to perform a written analysis 

identifying and comparing the air pollution control standards and other provisions of the 

proposed amendments to Rule 67.4 with existing or proposed District rules and guidelines and 

existing federal rules, requirements, and guidelines applying to the same source category.

ANALYSIS

Proposed amended Rule 67.4 applies to any facility that conducts metal container, closure or coil 

coating operations, and associated cleaning operations. Federal Subpart HHHHHH (6H) of the 

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), 40 CFR Part 63: Paint 

Stripping and Miscellaneous Surface Coating Operations at Area Sources applies to spray 

coating application at area sources to a metal substrate where the coatings contain hazardous air 

pollutants (target HAP) - chromium, lead, manganese, nickel, or cadmium. The two companies 

in San Diego County that are regulated by Rule 67.4 conduct spray coating operations on metal 

surfaces. However, the coatings used at these facilities do not contain any target HAP and 

therefore are not subject to Subpart 6H.

District New Source Review (NSR) Rule 20.2 - Non-Major Stationary Sources, also applies to 

any new or modified coating operation that would be subject to amended Rule 67.4. Rule 20.2 

requires that any non-major new or modified emission unit that has a post-project potential to 

emit of 10 pounds/day or more of volatile organic compounds (VOC) be equipped with Best 

Available Control Technology (BACT). For coating operations, BACT is identified as either use 

of an add-on emission control system, or if such system is demonstrated to be not cost-effective, 

compliance with the requirements of current prohibitory rules. Proposed amendments to 

Rule 67.4 contain more stringent emission standards for cleaning materials that will become new 

BACT.

CONCLUSION

There are no conflicts or contradictions between the proposed amendments to Rule 67.4 and 

existing District rules or federal regulations.
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our report dated February 1, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements in the Annual Report of Camco Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in theRegistration Statements of Camco Financial Corporation on Forms S-8, File No. 333-94113, effectiveJanuary 5, 2000 and File Nos. 333-90142, 333-90152, 333-90158 and 333-90166 effective June 10,2002./s/ PLANTE MORAN PLLCAuburn Hills, Michigan
Exhibit 32(f)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Florida Power Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark F. Mulhern, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Mark F.
Mulhern


Mark F.
Mulhern


Senior
Vice President and


Chief
Financial Officer


March 2,
2009








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Megawatt Daily, September 16, 2011 (paid subscription)

This is a copyrighted item provided to EPA’s contractor through a single - user license. Copyrighted material is not placed in the electronic public docket. It is available in hard copy form in the official administrative record at EPA ’s Region 6 office . To view the hard copy form at EPA’s Region 6 office, please contact Joe Kordzi at 214 - 665 - 7186, Kordzi.joe@epa.gov , to schedule an appointment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,996,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,562,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,458,950
<PP&E>                                       7,707,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              85,242,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,131,569
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,666
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,354,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                85,242,845
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,557,484
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               46,820,598
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,850,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             130,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,244,014)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,095)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,238,919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,238,919)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.3**

 
|        |                            |                       | FAX (713) 651-0849       |
|--------|----------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------|
|   |                       |                       |                     |
|   | 1100  LOUISIANA SUITE 3800 | HOUSTON,  TEXAS 77002-5218 | TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191 |

 

February 19, 2009

 

Nexen Inc.

801 7th Avenue SW

Calgary, Alberta  T2P 3P7

 

Board of Directors:

 

We hereby consent to references to Ryder Scott Company L.P. relating tothe evaluation of certain oil and gas properties of Nexen Inc. (the “Company”)contained in the section entitled “Basis of Reserves Estimates” within “Reserves,Production and Related Information” as set out in Part I, Items 1&2Business and Properties of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2008.

 

 
|   | Very Truly Yours,             |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                          |
|   |                          |
|   | /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P. |
|   |                          |
|   | **RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P**. |

 

 

Houston Texas

February 19, 2009

 
| 1200, 530 8TH  AVENUE, S.W.  | CALGARY,  ALBERTA T2P 3S8    | TEL (403)  262-2799 | FAX (403)  262-2790 |
|------------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------|
| 621 17TH  STREET, SUITE 1550 | DENVER,  COLORADO 80293-1501 | TEL (303)  623-9147 | FAX (303)  623-4258 |

 

----
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

Halbert Construction Company, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 62250, 62251

)

Under Contract No. W912PL

- 10

- D

- 0114 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Jason R. Thornton, Esq.

Finch, Thornton & Baird, LLP

San Diego, CA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Mary K. Wrightson, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney

U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE WILSON

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter

judgment in favor of appellant.

It is the Board ’ s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b) , and the

parties ’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal s are sustained. In the nature of a

consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amoun t of

$550,000

. This amount is inclusive of Contract Disputes Act interest. No further

interest shall be paid.

Dated: July 2 7 , 20 23

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

(Signatures continued)2 I concur

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 62250, 62251

, Appeals of

Halbert Construction Company, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board ’ s Charter.

Dated: July 27, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mabel Velazquez, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 26, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reopened its prior decision for the sole purpose of determining whether there had been compliance with the procedural safeguards set forth in the consent judgment of *Municipal Labor Comm, v Sitkin*(79 Civ 5899). Having found no substantial violations of procedural safeguards, the Board adhered to its original decision disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Because claimant does not now allege any procedural errors, the Board’s decision must be upheld. In any event, the record does not support claimant’s contention that she was fired from her job. In fact, her employer testified that claimant would have still worked for him as he was satisfied with her work and her leaving caused him problems because it was at a very busy time. The fact that claimant gave a different version of how her employment ended merely presented a question of credibility which was within the sole province of the Board to resolve (see, *Matter of Baker [Hart-nett],*147 AD2d 790, *appeal dismissed*74 AD2d 714).

Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 25 45

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Ja m an e J. Smith
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i - Kan sa s C it y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Decem

be r 28 , 20 16 Fi le d: Jan ua ry

3, 2 01 7 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, BOW MAN, an d B ENTON, Ci rcu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Ja m an e Sm it h ap pe al s fro m th e jud gm en t of th e Dis tri ct Co ur t im po si ng 1

se nt en ce aft er he pl ead ed gu il ty to ro bb ery an d f i r e a r m c ha rg es
. His co un se l ha s

The Hon or ab le Greg Kay s, Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i.m ov ed to wit hd raw an d ha s fil e d a b rie f un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8

(1 96 7) , arg ui ng th at th e co ur t im po se d a su bs ta nt iv el y un reas on ab le se nt en ce. Sm it h ha s fil ed a pr o se br ie f ch al le ng in g th e co ur t’s co n cl us io n th at he was a care er of fen de r un de r U.S. Sen te nc in g G u i de li ne s § 4B 1.1

. He ha s al so fil ed a m ot io n req ue st in g th at hi s ap pe al be he ld in ab ey an ce pe nd in g an an ti ci pa te d Supr em e Co ur t de ci si on
.
Sm it h pl ead ed gu il ty aft er en te rin g in to a writ te n pl ea ag reem en t co nt ai ni ng an ap pe al waiv er. No t w it hs ta nd in g th e as se rti on s m ad e by co un se l an d Sm it h, we
co nc lu de th at th e ap pe al waiv er is en fo rcea bl e. See Uni te d St at es v. Sco tt , 62 7 F.3 d 70 2, 70 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w); Uni te d St at es v. And is , 33 3 F.3 d 88 6, 89 0– 92 (8 th Ci r.) (en ba nc ) (d is c u s s i ng th e en fo rcem en t of ap pe al waiv ers ), cert

. de ni ed , 54 0 U.S. 99 7 (2 00 3) ; se e al so Uni te d S t a t e s v. Lum pk in s, 68 7 F.3 d 10 11 , 10 14 –1 5 (8 th C i r
. 20 12 ) (en fo rci ng an ap pe al waiv er in an an al og ou s cas e), cert

. de ni ed , 13 3 S . Ct. 1 61 2 (2 01 3)

.
W e ha ve in de pe n d en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd un de r Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 , 80 (1 98 8) , an d ha ve fo un d no no n- fri vo lo us is su es fo r ap pe al

. W e gr an t co un se l’s

m ot io n t o wi th dr aw, de ny Sm it h’s m ot io n, an d d is m is s t hi s ap pe al

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
<PAGE>

                                                                         Page 29

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, John P. Derham Cato,, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The
Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:

1.  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
February 1, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 19, 2004



                                        /s/  John P. Derham Cato
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John P. Derham Cato
                                        Chairman, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
**For fastest processing, please attach this form and a PDF shipping label in an email to DairySanitaryCerts@ams.usda.gov.

DA-241 (01/2013)

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program.  (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).

To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Order entered May 23, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00361-CR

STANYELLE M. MILES-MCCLOUD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 187th District Court

Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017CR6735A

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Brooke Wagner’s May 21, 2018 request for an 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the 

reporter’s record filed within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THIRTY-NINE  WEEKS ENDED ON OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.





</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000879123
<NAME>                        Goody's Family Clothing, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              Jan-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 Feb-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   Oct-31-1998
<CASH>                           27,371
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                     266,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                315,213                 
<PP&E>                          165,627                 
<DEPRECIATION>                   61,434                 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  422,436                 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           220,065                 
<BONDS>                             608                 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0                 
<PREFERRED>                           0                 
<COMMON>                         28,063                 
<OTHER-SE>                      159,696                 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    422,436                 
<SALES>                         727,538                 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                727,538                 
<CGS>                           523,928                 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   173,150                 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0                 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0                 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  280                 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  31,585                 
<INCOME-TAX>                     11,892                 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              19,693                 
<DISCONTINUED>                        0                 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0                 
<CHANGES>                             0                 
<NET-INCOME>                     19,693                 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0.59                 
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.57                 
                                


</TABLE>