alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**For fastest processing, please attach this form and a PDF shipping label in an email to DairySanitaryCerts@ams.usda.gov.

DA-242 (01/2013)

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program.  (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).

To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Wise Metals Group, LLC (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Danny Mendelson, Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 19, 2004



By:

/s/    Danny MendelsonDanny MendelsonExecutive Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary




A signed original of this
written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEMITRIUS McGEE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CHAMBERLIN, M.D.; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-56173

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-01020-WQHJMA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2015** 

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Demitrius McGee appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging Eighth Amendment violations in

connection with his medical treatment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal of an action as barred by

FILED

APR 16 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
the applicable statute of limitations, Ellis v. City of San Diego, 176 F.3d 1183,

1188 (9th Cir. 1999), and we affirm.

The district court dismissed McGee’s claims as untimely, and he has failed

to make a showing that his claims were not time-barred or entitled to any tolling

beyond that afforded by the district court. See Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §§ 335.1,

352.1(a) (two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims; two-year

tolling period due to incarceration). Contrary to McGee’s contention, the record

shows that he had adequate notice of the grounds upon which his claims were

dismissed.

AFFIRMED.

2 14-56173
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00194-CR

Jay Steven Miller

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From County Criminal Court No. 3

of Tarrant County (1222709)

April 16, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
#### In the Matter of Harry Norman Stone, an Attorney, Respondent.

Fourth Department,

December 26, 1991

*2APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Harry Norman Stone,*respondent *pro se.*

*Gerard M. LaRusso*for Office of Grievance Committees.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney by this court on February 16, 1971. He was admitted to practice in Arizona on or about 1978. Respondent was charged in the State of Arizona with contempt of court and other unprofessional conduct arising out of his matrimonial action. Thereafter, respondent, on January 21, 1991, executed a consent to disbarment. By order of the Supreme Court of Arizona, respondent was disbarred, effective April 23, 1991.

22 NYCRR 1022.22 (c) provides that an attorney can be disciplined in the State of New York based upon discipline imposed in another jurisdiction. The respondent, having been notified that he had a right to demand a hearing in the Appellate Division, waived a hearing and presented a petition in mitigation claiming that the charges arose because of his emotional state during his matrimonial action.

We are of the opinion that the ends of justice will best be served by imposing upon respondent a suspension from the practice of law in New York State until further order of the court.

Denman, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Green, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.22.
4/17/2015

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXA

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

COANo. 

MCCREARY, JODY FORD Tr. Ct. No. 007-1110-10 

The appellant's pro se petition for discretionary review has this da

and filed.

A

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John J. Holland, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Butler
Manufacturing Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the company for the year period
December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
company. March 12, 2004
    
    /s/ John J. HollandDated
    
    John J. Holland
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
 A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO BUTLER MANUFACTURING COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY
AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
Exhibit 10.60

                     First Amendment to Consulting Agreement



     This First Amendment to Consulting  Agreement (the "Consulting  Agreement")
dated as of March 1,  1999  between  Qorus.com,  Inc.,  a  Delaware  Corporation
("Qorus") and Thurston Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Thurston").


                                   WITNESSETH


         WHEREAS, Qorus and Thurston entered into the Consulting Agreement under
which Qorus engaged Thurston as an independent contractor to advise Qorus on and
with respect to obtaining  financing of any sort and to advise it and act as its
agent in  connection  with any  transaction,  including  but not  limited to any
business combination, merger, acquisition or sale; and

         WHEREAS, the term of the Consulting Agreement expires March 31, 2002;
and

         WHEREAS,  Qorus  and  Thurston  would  like to  extend  the term of the
Consulting Agreement.

         NOW THEREFORE,  in  consideration of the mutual promises of the parties
hereto,  the  adequacy  and  sufficiency  of which is hereby  acknowledged,  the
parties  hereto agree that the  Expiration  Date,  as defined in the  Consulting
Agreement, is hereby extended to March 31, 2004.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Qorus and Thurston have executed and delivered this
document on March 15, 2002



QORUS.COM, INC.                             THURSTON GROUP, INC.

By:      Thomas C. Ratchford                   By:      Patrick J. Haynes, III
Title:   Chief Financial Officer            Title:   Chief Executive Officer
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE IV

SOLIDARITY

SOLIDARITY

Article 36

Access to services of general economic interest

The Union recognises and respects access to services of general economic interest as provided for in national laws and practices, in accordance with the Treaties, in order to promote the social and territorial cohesion of the Union.

---
• StaIIlI'ds fir GIIa'8tll'S ofIIaZa'lDJs Wasta 

53 n45OII8-45IBJ 

rwmrB,BIII 

UbJ-IIWA lbtIIr VJ 

1111 0f1i:8 ofMII_..t lIII_thas IB:iIlId that IItrtnIIIIIISlI'S ofUIIIDlDfBst IBId IIJt iDDI UII '1U'd8n IIDJsIn statllnBlt" III UII 

nmrest IftomSlIIB:eslIIl1111tD1a1lD'd8n III UBn. IMII111l1U'8!J8S Statss that havB..OD'ID'1ItBd UII stat8DBIt to I'lItaiI /lllll 

lIIDI'1IIJBS tIIJsB will havB IIJt ysthD'ID'1ItBd ftto 101ft at afubJ'B datB. 1W1IV8I'. UII dBdsIIIIl'1IlJlII'IIi~ wIIItIII' lrllJt to 101 UII statlml1t Is 

IIIIthIIy " to UII StatB _ UII finn. 11IIS. tIisclB:klst Is ~tDB.

fOOAllCIA C1TAMII I 

AIIAlaJI 

STAn C1TAMII 

WAC113-3m 

QIIV. 

IAUJiTI 

IIAlIAIlAlIC II: 

IIIAIO 

lIa1 

PART 282 -STAfllAIlDS APPIJ:AIIlEm1BIIIA11IlS If IIAZARIJlJIm WASlI 

_ART B. 111 MANHST
 

1tDERAl RBJDREMENIS 

-110 &1lIO(1) x 

• APPENDIXmPART 282 

11INIFOIlM RAZARmms WASTE MANHST 

lDqa IIXIiratiJJ 

datB: lIIdIU'IIBn 

discIDsIJ'B statBmll1t ·8700-22 -mo x 

8711J-22A -1lIO(1) x 

• rmllllDl' B, BIll -P8gB 1of1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                               CONSENT OF KPMG LLP



The Board of Directors of Bradley Real Estate, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-63707, 333-42357, 333-28167, 33-87084, 33-64811, 333-69131, and 333-92979)
on Form S-3 of Bradley Real Estate, Inc., the registration statements (Nos.
333-30587, 33-34884 and 33-65180) on Form S-8 of Bradley Real Estate, Inc., and
the registration statements (Nos. 333-36577 and 333-51675) on Form S-3 of
Bradley Operating Limited Partnership of our report dated January 21, 2000,
except as to Note 15, which is as of March 10, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Bradley Real Estate, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in share owners' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1999 and related financial statement
schedule III, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Bradley Real Estate, Inc.

                                                        KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 24, 2000
#### D. G. LEISURE PRODUCTS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CREDIT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 14868.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Oct. 19, 1977.

*582Bryce E. Roe, Pamela R. Taggart, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

Robert S. Campbell, Jr., Glen E. Davies, Duane R. Smith, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

ELLETT, Chief Justice:

A mobile home dealer bought mobile homes from the respondent manufacturer. Initially he paid cash upon delivery. Later, he arranged credit with the appellant. The procedure thereafter was as follows: When the dealer would order a unit, the respondent would call the appellant and obtain an approval number. It would then deliver the unit to the dealer and send an invoice, together with title papers, to the appellant. As soon as the unit arrived at the dealer’s place, the appellant would send payment in full to the respondent. The evidence amply sustains the trial court’s finding that this was the course of dealing between the parties.

The appellant put evidence before the court to the effect that an approval number would be given only if the dealer had not exceeded his credit amount. No notice of such a limitation was given to the respondent, and respondent had a right to rely on the custom of shipping the ordered units as soon as it got an approval number.

This lawsuit arose because the appellant refused to pay for five units which respondent shipped to the dealer. Four units were shipped after appellant had given approval numbers on them. The respondent could not show that it had an approval number for the fifth unit. The trial court gave judgment to the respondent for the value of the four units which were shipped after the appellant had given its approval, and refused to award any amount for the fifth unit. This appeal is from the judgment rendered. There is no cross-appeal for the fifth unit.

The law governing this case is correctly set out in the hornbook series entitled Simpson on Contracts at page 8:

> EXPRESS AND IMPLIED CONTRACTS

> • True contracts are those in which obligation arises from actual agreement and intent of the parties to promise. If the agreement or mutual assent is manifested in words, oral or written, the contract is said to be ‘express.’ On the other hand, where the mutual undertaking of the parties is inferred from their conduct alone, without spoken or written words, the contract is said to be ‘implied in fact.’ In either case a real agreement is manifested.

The appellant claims that it would be obligated to pay for certain shipments only when it had a contract from a purchaser, discounted and assigned to it by the dealer, or from the proceeds of the sale on specially-made units. We think the evidence before the court fully justified its holding that there was a contract implied-in-fact which required the appellant to pay for all units that were shipped pursuant to an approval made by the appellant.

The judgment is affirmed. Costs are awarded to the respondent.

CROCKETT, MAUGHAN, WILKINS and HALL, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# TIME and DATE:

 2:00 p.m., Monday, January 14, 2013. 

# PLACE:

 1325 G Street NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005. 

# STATUS: 

Open. 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                         Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate Secretary, (202) 220-2376;                         *ehall@nw.org.*

# AGENDA:

 

I. Call to Order 

II. Officer Performance Reviews 

III. Human Resources Update 

IV. Corporate Administration Committee Charter 

V. Adjournment 

Erica Hall, 

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2013-00301 Filed 1-7-13; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 23, 2015

t0916 

# Order

Clerk September 23, 2015

150710 & (44)

HOWARD T. LINDEN, C onservator for the

Estate of INDIA ARNE THOMAS, a/k/a INIA

A RNE THOMAS,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

Cross

- Appellant,

v SC: 150710

COA: 312702

Ingham CC: 10

- 001572

- NF

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA,

Defendant/

Third

- Party Plaintiff

- Appellant,

Cross

- Appellee,

and

WILLIAM THOMAS and TAMAKIA THOMAS,

Third

- Party Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross

appellant are consider ed, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 15, 2015

No. 04-15-00085-CR

Ricardo O. MORENO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 13, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 135229

Honorable Monica A. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on April 15, 2015.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of April, 2015.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE II

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 4

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUDGET AND DISCHARGE

Article 317

(ex Article 274 TEC)

(ex Article 274 TEC)

The Commission shall implement the budget in cooperation with the Member States, in accordance with the provisions of the regulations made pursuant to Article 322, on its own responsibility and within the limits of the appropriations, having regard to the principles of sound financial management. Member States shall cooperate with the Commission to ensure that the appropriations are used in accordance with the principles of sound financial management.

The regulations shall lay down the control and audit obligations of the Member States in the implementation of the budget and the resulting responsibilities. They shall also lay down the responsibilities and detailed rules for each institution concerning its part in effecting its own expenditure.

Within the budget, the Commission may, subject to the limits and conditions laid down in the regulations made pursuant to Article 322, transfer appropriations from one chapter to another or from one subdivision to another.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 857 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 857

To provide for the withdrawal of certain Federal land in Garden Valley, 
                                Nevada.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2015

  Ms. Titus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the withdrawal of certain Federal land in Garden Valley, 
                                Nevada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Garden Valley Withdrawal Act''.

SEC. 2. GARDEN VALLEY, NEVADA, WITHDRAWAL.

    Subject to valid existing rights in existence on the date of 
enactment of this Act, the approximately 805,100 acres of Federal land 
generally depicted on the map entitled ``Garden Valley Withdrawal 
Area'' and dated July 11, 2014, is withdrawn from--
            (1) entry, appropriation, and disposal under the public 
        land laws;
            (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and
            (3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral materials, 
        and geothermal leasing laws.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yang Holding Company ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I. James
Chow, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          Material respects,  the financial condition and result of operation of
          the Company.

                                                  /s/ James Chow
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  James Chow
                                                  President, Treasurer and
                                                  Secretary. Principal Financial
                                                  and Accounting Officer.
August 10, 2004