alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                             781
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      131
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,295
<PP&E>                                          57,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,579
<BONDS>                                         31,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,043
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,821
<SALES>                                         12,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,294
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,110
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,110
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65


</TABLE>
----

|  | 1. | The Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 3, 2014 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June 3, 2014 | By:    | /s/ Joseph B. Armes                                                       |  |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|                     |   | Joseph B. ArmesChairman of the BoardPresident and Chief Executive Officer |  |

----
#### State v. Lee

24208

04/10/2003

Reversed
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1569 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1569

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2019

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff and Yuma to the 
list of locations in which court shall be held in the judicial district 
                       for the State of Arizona.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT COURTS IN THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT FOR THE STATE OF 
              ARIZONA.

    Section 82 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, and Tucson'' and inserting ``Flagstaff, 
Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson, and Yuma''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 10, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Arkansas_county_differentials_2
M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 of NUECES COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 5th day of 

February, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

David C. McCoy and Judy L. McCoy, Appellants,

v.

Michael Morgan and Michael Morgan 

State Farm Insurance

Appellees.

CAUSE NO. 13-14-00702-CV (Tr.Ct.No. 2013-CCV-62265-2)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 5, 2015.

  

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal 

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 21st day of April, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

GREGORY S. BURKE,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheet as of November 1, 1997 and the related  consolidated
statements of operations for the thirty-nine weeks ended on November 1, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>              0000879123           
<NAME>             Goody's Family Clothing, Inc.           
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Feb-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Nov-01-1997                 
<CASH>                                         28,947
<SECURITIES>                                   1,518
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    215,234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               262,852
<PP&E>                                         147,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                 51,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          181,488
<BONDS>                                        25,871
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       28,139
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,658
<SALES>                                        637,171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               637,171
<CGS>                                          461,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  150,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                25,617
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,606
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            16,011
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   16,011
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31(iv)

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, John E. Kirksey, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Camco Financial Corporation; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: July 13, 2012 |  | /s/ John E. Kirksey          
|                    |  | John E. Kirksey              
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                    |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of Paul D. Powsner an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

February 4, 1992

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Naomi F. Simon*of counsel *(Hal R. Lieberman,*attorney), for petitioner.

No appearance on behalf of respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department (DDC), moves for an order, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i) and (ii), suspending respondent from the practice of law forthwith, and until such time as disciplinary matters pending before the DDC have been concluded.

*126Respondent, Paul D. Powsner, was admitted to the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, on December 19, 1951. At all times relevant herein, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

Respondent has executed an affidavit of judgment by confession in favor of the complainant, I. Reiss & Son, in the amount of $1,359,504.15, which includes admissions that he converted that amount from the complainant in connection with two real estate transactions in 1990. Respondent has not answered the DDC’s requests for a response to the complaint, and he has not responded to the instant motion seeking his immediate suspension.

The DDC contends, and we agree, that respondent’s admissions under oath that he has committed serious acts of professional misconduct require immediate intervention by this court in the form of an order prohibiting him from practicing law pending resolution of the disciplinary proceeding now pending against him *(Matter of Pins,*169 AD2d 166). Accordingly, petitioner’s motion should be granted, and respondent suspended from the practice of law forthwith, and until such time as the disciplinary matter before the DDC has been concluded, and until further order of this court.

Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Asch and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Respondent is suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York forthwith and until such time as the complaints against him have been finally disposed of and until the further order of this court.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00300

- CR

Kristin Nichole Bowling

v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 105th District Court of Kleberg County , Texas Trial Cause No. 14

- AC

- 0466

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered th is cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed as moot

. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED AS MOOT in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 1 7 , 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATION AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOW FILED AS PART OF ALTEON INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-
Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                27,277,400
<SECURITIES>                          11,589,970
<RECEIVABLES>                             83,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      39,945,569
<PP&E>                                 4,009,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        45,049,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  5,221,167
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                 156,803
<OTHER-SE>                            39,431,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          45,049,898
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1,773,318
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      12,216,304
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        37,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (10,480,559)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (10,480,559)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                        (10,480,559)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.67)
        

</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 297 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1492 

[Report No. 116–374] 

To update the map of, and modify the maximum acreage available for 

inclusion in, the Yucca House National Monument. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2019 

Mr. TIPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

JANUARY 10, 2020 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 4, 2019] 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1492 RH

A BILL 

To update the map of, and modify the maximum acreage 

available for inclusion in, the Yucca House National 

Monument. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1492 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Yucca House National 

5 Monument Expansion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) NATIONAL MONUMENT.—The term ‘‘National 

9 Monument’’ means the Yucca House National Monu10 ment in Cortez, Colorado, established by Presidential 

11 Proclamation 1549. 

12 (2) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map enti13 tled ‘‘Yucca House National Monument Proposed 

14 Boundary Addition’’, numbered 318/105,085A, and 

15 dated February 27, 2019. 

16 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

17 the Secretary of the Interior. 

18 SEC. 3. YUCCA HOUSE NATIONAL MONUMENT LAND ACQUI19 SITION. 

20 (a) ACQUISITION.—The Secretary may acquire by do21 nation the approximately 160 acres of land and any inter22 ests in the land that is identified on the map. 

23 (b) BOUNDARY.—On the acquisition of the land au24 thorized under subsection (a), the Secretary shall adjust the 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 1492 RH

1 boundaries of the National Monument to include the ac2 quired land. 

3 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—The land and any interests in 

4 land acquired under subsection (a) shall be administered 

5 as part of the National Monument. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 297 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1492 

[Report No. 116–374] 

A BILL 

To update the map of, and modify the maximum 

House National Monument. acreage available for inclusion in, the Yucca 

JANUARY 10, 2020 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
ACCEPTED12-14-00116-CRTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS4/17/2015 6:03:03 PMCATHY LUSKCLERK
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2501

FRANCES L. PLEMICH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SCOTT ORTHOPEDIC CENTER, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-95-422-3) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 30, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frances L. Plemich, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Allen Wilson, Jr., CAMPBELL, WOODS, BAGLEY, EMERSON, MCNEER & HERNDON, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Frances L. Plemich appeals the district court’s order granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing her claims arising under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 1998), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(1)(1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Plemich v. Scott Orthopedic Center, Inc. , No. CA-95-422-3 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 862 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide that the first sale doctrine 

applies to any computer program that enables a machine or other product 

to operate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2015 

Mr. FARENTHOLD (for himself and Mr. POLIS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide that 

the first sale doctrine applies to any computer program 

that enables a machine or other product to operate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘You Own Devices Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FIRST SALE DOCTRINE AND CERTAIN COMPUTER 

6 PROGRAMS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 109 of title 17, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 862 IH

1 ‘‘(f) TRANSFER OF CERTAIN COMPUTER PRO2 GRAMS.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 

4 106 or section 117, if a computer program enables 

5 any part of a machine or other product to operate, 

6 the owner of the machine or other product is entitled 

7 to transfer an authorized copy of the computer pro8 gram, or the right to obtain such copy, when the 

9 owner sells, leases, or otherwise transfers the ma10 chine or other product to another person. The right 

11 to transfer provided under this subsection may not 

12 be waived by any agreement. 

13 ‘‘(2) SECURITY AND ERROR CORRECTION.—Any 

14 right to receive modifications to the computer pro15 gram described in paragraph (1) relating in whole or 

16 in part to security or error correction that applied 

17 to the owner of the machine or other product de18 scribed in paragraph (1) shall apply to the person to 

19 whom the machine or product and the copy of the 

20 computer program are transferred. 

21 ‘‘(3) TREATMENT OF UNAUTHORIZED COP22 IES.—Nothing in this subsection should be construed 

23 as permitting the owner of a machine or other prod24 uct to retain an unauthorized copy of the computer 

25 program described in paragraph (1) after transferVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:28 Feb 18, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H862.IH H862

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 862 IH

1 ring the machine or other product and the copy of 

2 the computer program to another person.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact5 ment of this Act and shall apply to transfers of computer 

6 programs occurring on or after such date. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# North Carolina_county_different
# C_2016202EN.01006401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/64

---

Article 41

(ex Article 35 TEC)

(ex Article 35 TEC)

To enable the objectives set out in Article 39 to be attained, provision may be made within the framework of the common agricultural policy for measures such as:

| (a) | an effective coordination of efforts in the spheres of vocational training, of research and of the dissemination of agricultural knowledge; this may include joint financing of projects or institutions; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

an effective coordination of efforts in the spheres of vocational training, of research and of the dissemination of agricultural knowledge; this may include joint financing of projects or institutions;

| (b) | joint measures to promote consumption of certain products. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

joint measures to promote consumption of certain products.

---
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE. 

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT

USDA, AMS, SCP, SCI Division

Equipment & Forms Depot

100 Riverside Parkway, Suite 101

Fredericksburg, VA 22406

Phone: 650-552-9073

Fax: 540-361-1199

Email: SCSupplyDepot@usda.gov

EQUIPMENT CATALOG
SQUASH 

PATTY PAN (SCALLOP) BUTTERCU

FOR IDENTIFICATION ONLY Patty Pan, Bu

October 1990 (Prev
SQUASH 

ZUCCHINI BANANA 

ACORN 

FOR IDENTIFICATION ONLY Zucch

October 1990 (Prev
SQUASH 

Different varieties may be certified using the U.S. standards (Fall and Winte

Top Left: Golden (orange) acorn squash. Top Right: Yellow acorn squash. 

Center: Green acorn squash. 

FOR IDENTIFICATION ONLY 

PUMPKINS 

Surface mold present to this degree is considered materially detracting from the 

appearance of the pumpkin. Score as "damage by surface mold." 

(Surface mold is not to be scored as serious damage.) PUM-IDENT-1 

MAY2006