T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). P R / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T CA RLO S RO BERTO PA LA CI O SGU Z MAN, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74136 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 907- 476 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C ar l os R ob ert o P al ac i os-G uzm an, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f E l S al vado r, pe t i t i ons pr o s e f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f

r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f or 

# FI LED FEB 25 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSP R/ Res ea r ch 07- 74136 2 asyl u m , w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al , an dp ro t ect i o n u n d er th e C o n v en t i o n A g ai n st T ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or s ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e , O rn ela s-Ch a vez v . G on zales , 4 5 8 F .3 d1 0 5 2 , 1 0 5 5 - 5 6 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 6 ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatP al ac i os-G uzm an d e m o n s tr a te dc h a n g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s to e x c u s e h is u n tim e lya s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 C . F . R . § 1208. 4( a ) ( 4) . A c c or di ngl y , w e de nythe pe t i t i on a s t o hi s a s y l um c l a i m. S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s f i nd i ng thatP al ac i os-G uzm an di d note s t abl i s h pa s tpe r s e c ut i on orac l e arpr obabi l i tyof f utur e pe r s e c ut i on, b e c au s e h e f

a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te th e g o v e rn m e n t w a s u n w illin g o ru n ab le to p r o te c t h im f

r o m th e g r o up th a t k id n ap p e dh im . Se e N a h rv a n i v . G on zales , 399 F .3 d1 1 4 8 , 1 1 5 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) ; see a l so Ca stro -P erez v . G on zales , 409 F . 3d 1 0 6 9 , 1 0 7 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) ( f a ilu r e to r e p o rt n o n - g o v e rn m e n ta l p e r s e c u tio n du e to bel i ef thatpo l i ce w ou l d d o n othi ng di d n otes t abl i sh thatgo vernm entw as u n w il li n g o r u n ab le to co n tro l p er se cu to rs ). A cc o rd in g ly, P alac io s- G u zm an ’s w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m fai l s. S ub stan ti al ev id en ce su p p o rts th e a g en cy ’s d en ial o f P alac io s- G u zm an ’s C A T c l a i m be c aus e he f a i l e d t o de m ons tr at e i ti s m or e l i ke l ythan nothe w i l l beP R/ Res ea r ch 07- 74136 3 to rtu r e dif

r e tu rn e dto E l S a lv a d o r . Se e A r te aga v . Mukasey , 511 F . 3d 940, 948- 49 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.