alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01019701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/197 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/197

---

Article 354

(ex Article 309 TEC)

(ex Article 309 TEC)

For the purposes of Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union on the suspension of certain rights resulting from Union membership, the member of the European Council or of the Council representing the Member State in question shall not take part in the vote and the Member State in question shall not be counted in the calculation of the one third or four fifths of Member States referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of that Article. Abstentions by members present in person or represented shall not prevent the adoption of decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of that Article.

For the adoption of the decisions referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, a qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(b) of this Treaty.

Where, following a decision to suspend voting rights adopted pursuant to paragraph 3 of Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, the Council acts by a qualified majority on the basis of a provision of the Treaties, that qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(b) of this Treaty, or, where the Council acts on a proposal from the Commission or from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, in accordance with Article 238(3)(a).

For the purposes of Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, the European Parliament shall act by a two-thirds majority of the votes cast, representing the majority of its component Members.

---
If warehouse(s) is in one of the Texas counties listed below, complete form CCC-823-1T.
• 11/01/93 

RCRA REV[S[ON CHECKL[ST 84 

Toxicity Characteristic; Chlorofluorocarbon Refrigerants 

56 FR 5910-5915 

February 13, 1991
 

(RCRA Cluster I, HSWA Rule)
 

.Note: This Revision Checklist addresses an interim final rule which suspends the Toxicity. Characteristic (TC) rule 

(see 55 FR 11798, March 29, 1990, Revision Checklist 74) for certain used chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants which 

exhibit the toxicity characteristic and which are recycled. The exemption only applies. if the refrigerants are 

reclaimed for reuse. This interim final rule provides for a standard which is narrower in scope·than would be 

imposed in the final TC rule. Thus, States are not required to mandate this narrower-in-scope standard 11, and the 

affected citation is designated as optional. Section 3009 of RCRA, however, provides that States may impose 

·requirements that are broader in scope or more stringent than those imposed under Federal regulations. 

FEDERAL 

REQU[REMENT 

. FEDERAL 

RCRA 

CITATION 

ANALOGOUS 

STATE 

CITATION 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

MORE 

EQUIV- STR[NALENT GENT 

BROADER IN 

SCOPE 

PART 261 • IDENTIF[CAT[ON AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS ~STE ~C 173-303 

SUBPART A - GENERAL 

t EXCLUSIONS 

used chlorofluoro­

• This rule is considered "narrower-in-scope" because it narrows the wastes which are 

regulation certain chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants as specified at 261.4(b)(12)_ 

carbon refrigerants 

from tota II y enclosed 

heat transfer equipment, provided the 

refrigera.nt is 

reclaimed for further 

yse 261.4(bH12) 506 

regulated, by exluding from 

X 

• February 13, 1991 - Page 1 of 1
,;-t'"'1-<>•z"00•1fDEPARTMENTOFEDMUNDG.BROWNJR.•GOVERNORFJN A NCE'--------c.;c,c;,,-;-,";;s'OTo;;;•;;;•"'T""•""'sC:A::Cco:O,A:::M:::<;NT:;:a;,CA;;0-;5:;;5.;;BC.,o;,o::;,=;_cO:A-';,oC,o:C"May26,2016Mr.ByronK.Huffman,ActingDirectorFederalAviationAdministrationOfficeofAirportComplianceandManagementAnalysis8001ndependenceAvenue,SVVWashington,DC20591Subject:TheStateofCalifornia'sActionPlaninResponsetoFAAPolicyChange79FR66282-01;DocketFAA-2013-0988DearMr.Huffman:ThisletterfollowstheApril27,2016meetingbetweenofficialsfromtheFederalAviationAdministration(FAA),theCaliforniaDepartmentofFinance,theCaliforniaStateTransportationAgencyandtheCaliforniaAirportCouncil,inwhich(1)theDepartmentofFinance'sNovember25,2015ActionPlaninresponsetotheFAA'spolicychangeregardinglocaltaxesonaviationfueland(2)theFAA'sMarch10,2016tetteracknowledgingtheActionPlanwerediscussed.Atthemeeting,FAASeniorAttorneyElizabethNewmanclarifiedthestatementintheFAA'sMarch10letterthat"weunderstandthattheStatewillnotsubmitarequestforgrandfatheredstatus...fortaxesonaviationfuelineffectonDecember30,1987."SheexplainedthatthisstatementwasnotintendedtoimplythattheStatewaslegallyrequiredtorequestgrandfatheredstatusforpre-December30,1987statesalestaxrates,butwasmerelyintendedtoseekadditiOnalinformationsothattheFAAcouldunderstandallstatesalestaxratesineffectinCalifornia.MichaelCohen,DirectorofFinance,committedtoprovidingtheFAAinformationregardingstatesalestaxratesenactedbeforeDecember30,1987,andthatinformationisenclosedwiththisletter.FAArepresentativesagreedduringthemeetingthatthemethodology,aspresentedintheState'sActionPlanandrestatedatthemeeting,bywhichtheStatewilldeterminewhetherstategeneralsalestaxrevenuesderivedfromaviationfueloffsetsstateexpendituresonlocalpublicuseairportsiscorrect.Theyexpressedconcern,however,thattheActionPlandidnotprovidesufficientdetailregardingtheprocesstorefinetheseestimates.DirectorCohencommittedtoprovidingsufficientdetailintheDepartmentofFinance'sexplanationofitsestimatessothattheFAAcouldconfirmtheState'sapproach,andthattheexpendituresclaimedbytheStatewereconsistentwiththosesetforthintheFAA'srevenueusepolicy.KevinWillis,ManageroftheFAA'sOfficeofAirportCompliance,confirmedthatoncethisapproachwasapprovedbytheFAA,thereviewprocesswouldbecompleteandtheStatewouldnotberequiredtosubmitfutureestimatestodemonstrateitscompliancewiththeFAA'spolicyunlesstheFAAcontactedtheStatetoinvestigateacomplaint.TheDepartmentofFinanceappreciatestheFAA'sclarificationofthesematters,andwillsubmitfurtherinformationregardingitsestimatesatanappropriatetime.Sincerely,liu4.KristinProgramBudgetManagerForecasting,Labor,andTransportationEnclosures2016-17CaliforniaStatewideSalesandUseTaxRates(asofJanuary1,2016)overofAprll1,1974,andhasnotvariedsince.and6201.15)betweentheGeneralFundandLocalRevenueFund3.6875%RetainedintheGeneralFund.1.0625%DedicatedtotheLocalRevenueFund2011forspaclfiedI7202and72036051.2and6201.26051.3and6201.3ji
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-20169) and related prospectus pertaining to the Cal-Maine
Foods, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan and in the Post-Effective amendment NO. 1
to Form S-1 on Form S-3 (No. 333-14809) and related prospectus pertaining
to shares underlying common stock purchase warrants of Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.,
of our report dated July 10, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended May 30, 1998.


                                         s/ Ernst & Young, LLP


Jackson, Mississippi
August 24, 1998
# C_2016203EN.01004401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/44

---

Article 174

1.   The expenditure shown in the operating budget shall include in particular:

| (a) | administrative expenditure; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

administrative expenditure;

| (b) | expenditure relating to safeguards and to health and safety. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

expenditure relating to safeguards and to health and safety.

2.   The expenditure shown in the research and investment budget shall include in particular:

| (a) | expenditure relating to the implementation of the Community research programme; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

expenditure relating to the implementation of the Community research programme;

| (b) | any participation in the capital of the Agency and in its investment expenditure; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

any participation in the capital of the Agency and in its investment expenditure;

| (c) | expenditure relating to the equipment of training establishments; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

expenditure relating to the equipment of training establishments;

| (d) | any participation in Joint Undertakings or in certain joint operations. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

any participation in Joint Undertakings or in certain joint operations.

---
Exhibit 11.1

WIRELESS TELECOM GROUP, INC.COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE
EARNINGS(Unaudited)

|                                               |  | For the Three Months
|---------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|                                               |  | Ended March 31,     
|                                               |  | 2007                
|Net Income                                     |  | $
      663,243     
|BASIC EARNINGS:                                |  |                     
|Weighted average number of common shares       |  |                     
|outstanding                                    |  | 25,853,851          
|Basic earnings
      per common share          |  | $ 0.03              
|DILUTED EARNINGS:                              |  |                     
|Weighted average
      number of common shares |  |                     
|outstanding                                    |  | 25,853,851          
|Assumed exercise of stock options              |  | 115,938             
|Weighted average
      number of common shares |  |                     
|outstanding, as adjusted                       |  | 25,969,789          
|Diluted earnings per common share              |  | $ 0.03              

---
FORMAL RECOMMENDATION BY THE

NATIONAL ORGANIC STANDARDS BOARD (NOSB) 

TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIC PROGRAM (NOP) 

Date: ____11-11-06____________________

Subject: Sunset Renewal Vote for Lecithin, bleached under 205.605b synthetics allowed. 

Chair: Kevin O’Rell 

 

Recommendation

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action: _XXX___ 

Guidance Statement: ________ 

Other: ________ 

Statement of the Recommendation (including Recount of Vote):

The Board recommends renewing Lecithin, bleached 205.605b synthetics allowed. 

NOSB Vote: Motion: Andrea Caroe Second: Bea James 

Board vote: Yes - 11 No- 3 Abstain- 0 Absent - 0 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with OFPA and NOP):

Sunset Material Vote 

Response by the NOP:
National Organic Standards Board 

Final Recommendation for Lecithin, bleached 

October 19, 2006 

I. List: 205.605 Nonagricultural (nonorganic) substances allowed as ingredients in or on 

processed products labeled as “organic” or “made with organic (specified ingredients or 

food groups.” 

 (b) Synthetics allowed 

II. Committee Summary: 

On April 20, 2006,as part of the Sunset Review process, the Board voted not to re-list bleached 

lecithin, based on public comment from the industry which indicated that the organic and nonsynthetic forms of lecithin, bleached and unbleached could fulfill the same functions in an organic 

system. New detailed information was received during the last comment period from several 

manufacturers that use this as an ingredient. It has become clear that although there are plentiful 

non-synthetic and organic alternatives to synthetic bleached lecithin in liquid form, there is 

currently no such alternative for bleached lecithin in dry, de-oiled form, 

It is the goal of this Board to encourage the development of new organic alternatives to 

conventional materials. The emergence in the last four years, of a variety of organic alternatives 

to bleached liquid lecithin is a clear example that the National List process is working as it was 

intended: to promote and not inhibit the development organic alternatives to conventional 

materials. It is the hope of the Board that in the coming years, we will be asked to consider 

increasing petitions for the removal from the National List of conventional materials for which 

organic alternatives have been made commercially available. Nevertheless, it is now clear that 

there is neither a non-synthetic, nor an organic alternative to dry, de-oiled synthetic lecithin. 

It is not possible to re-new the dry form and not re-new the liquid form, because annotations 

cannot be entertained as part of the Sunset Review. Therefore, at this time we see no choice but 

to recommend that renewal of lecithin, bleached. 

The Board strongly hopes that a petition will be presented in short order to restrict the use of 

bleached lecithin to dry forms, only. 

III. Board Recommendation 

The Board recommends renewing the following substance(s) in this use category: 

Lecithin, bleached 

Moved: Andrea Caroe Seconded: Bea James 

Board vote: Yes - 11 No- 3 Abstain- 0 Absent- 0
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOW FILED AS PART OF ALTEON'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      25,595,207
<SECURITIES>                                 1,944,200
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,946,126
<PP&E>                                       3,804,167
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,742,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,059,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       157,108
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,444,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,742,836
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               443,969
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,213,122
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,777,578)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,777,578)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,777,578)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81417-81418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25815]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the 
agreements to the Secretary by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#edbe888e9f88998c9f94ad8b808ec38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6536000617001104171c250308064b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>, or by mail, 
Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 
20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received 
within 12 days of the date this

[[Page 81418]]

notice appears in the Federal Register, and the Commission requests 
that comments be submitted within 7 days on agreements that request 
expedited review. Copies of agreements are available through the 
Commission's website (www.fmc.gov) or by contacting the Office of 
Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f682849792939798979a8f859f85b6909b95d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ef9b9d8e8b8a8e818e83969c869caf89828cc1888099">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 201307-001.
    Agreement Name: Crowley/Sealand Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: Crowley Latin America Services, LLC; Maersk A/S DBA 
Sealand.
    Filing Party: Wayne Rohde; Cozen O'Connor.
    Synopsis: The amendment deletes Haiti from the geographic scope of 
the agreement and adjusts the amount of space being chartered.
    Proposed Effective Date: 11/16/2023.
    Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/AgreementHistory/22408 AgreementHistory/22408.

    Dated: November 17, 2023.
Carl Savoy,
Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-25815 Filed 11-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
H. R. 1520 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2021, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the 

Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021 (division A of Public Law 

116–159) is further amended by striking the date specified in section 

106(3) and inserting ‘‘December 28, 2020’’. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Further Extension of Continuing 

Appropriations Act, 2021’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# C_2016202EN.01008601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/86

---

Article 96

(ex Article 76 TEC)

(ex Article 76 TEC)

1.   The imposition by a Member State, in respect of transport operations carried out within the Union, of rates and conditions involving any element of support or protection in the interest of one or more particular undertakings or industries shall be prohibited, unless authorised by the Commission.

2.   The Commission shall, acting on its own initiative or on application by a Member State, examine the rates and conditions referred to in paragraph 1, taking account in particular of the requirements of an appropriate regional economic policy, the needs of underdeveloped areas and the problems of areas seriously affected by political circumstances on the one hand, and of the effects of such rates and conditions on competition between the different modes of transport on the other.

After consulting each Member State concerned, the Commission shall take the necessary decisions.

3.   The prohibition provided for in paragraph 1 shall not apply to tariffs fixed to meet competition.

---
## NA CEPT – 20 YE AR ANNIVER SA RY

RETR OSPE CTIVE: LE SSONS LE ARNED

## VA LU E OF NA CEPT CR OSS - CUTTING, BR OA D VIEW OF THE ISSUE S AD VICE LETTER S REFLE CT B ALANCE AMONG ALL MEMBER S’ INTERE STS AD VICE REPRE SENTS AN OBJE CTIVE VIEWPOINT RA THER THAN A VE STED INTERE ST OR PER SONAL A GEND A

## WHA

T ABOUT “CHAR GE S? ”

• Ef fe ctive Charges ar e very clearly writte n but not so narr ow as to cons tr ain good ideas. • NACEPT consult at ion with the righ t EP A pr ogr am sta ff is critical to under sta nding and implemen ting the charge. • Ta king time up fr on t thinking thr ough the charge will sa ve confusion lat er

. R eques t amendmen t/ clarification if necessary. • Outlining the r eport based on charge ma y help identify fuzzy ar eas.

### FEEDB AC K FR OM EP

A: Wha t about our Advice? EP A FEEDB AC K: • If long - te rm pr oject, pr ovide in te rim findings/pr eliminary obser vat ions • Be pr actical - think about what can be implemen te d within the timefr ame pr ovided • Be succinct, supporting re co mmendations with documen tat ion wher e possible

## Mor e Advice on Good Advice

• Re co mmendations needs t o be actionable

• If t opic has been r eview ed befor e (e. g., R eport on the En vir onmen t), build on pr evious work of the Council

• Consider consulting with EP A r egional of

fices (arr ange with EP

A poin t of cont act)

## Advice on Workgr oup Oper at ions

• Communication within the workgr oup is key. Success ful workgr oups had with face - to - fa ce meetings ev ery 4 t o 5 mon ths and c onfer ence ca lls every other week.

– “trying t o do everything thr ough c onference ca lls lower s the quality of the final pr oduct. It is much easier t o r each a co nsensus in face t o face meetings.”
• To o much lag time r esults in inef ficiency. • Con tr actor support is almos t essen tial on large topics. However , a c on tr actor who can do the fundamen ta ls but is not well - ve rs ed in the topic can be coun te r - pr oductiv e.

## Ex ample of Success ful Pr oject The “E verybody ’s Business” r eport w as e ffective because of its s tructur e: The r eport w as orga niz ed ar ound a few key findings and r ecommendations, which pr ovided st ructur e for the specific action s te ps that wer e included under each r ecommendation. The number of action s te ps kept to “less than everything ,” and wer e car ef ul to identify what of fice and per son in the Agency should r espond to each action s te p.Depends on t opic, but her e ar e a few:
• En vir onmen ta l Finance Advisory Boar d (FAC A) • Science Advisory Boar d (FAC A) • Innov ation Action Council – in te rnal with two state r epr esen tat iv es • Science P olicy Council (Of fice of the Science Advisor) – in te rnal with r egional and HQ s taff 

### Mor e Coor dina tion with Other Advisory Gr oup s w as R ec ommended

## Pe rformance Measur es...
• Ov er the ne xt t en y ear s, how would y ou define success for NA CEPT? • Is the ultimat e measur e of NA CEPT ’s success the number of r ec ommendations accept ed and implemen te d by EP

A? • Other measur es of success? THE SUCCE SS OF NA CEPT IS IN YOUR HANDS!
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Paul A. Ormond, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Manor
Care, Inc. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1)  The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
              ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
              Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
              requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
              the Report.

/s/ Paul A. Ormond

Paul A. Ormond
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
November 2, 2004