alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 128 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 128

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 9, 2019

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To clarify the primary functions and duties of the Office of Advocacy 
     of the Small Business Administration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Advocacy Improvements 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PRIMARY FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF 
              ADVOCACY OF THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Primary Functions.--Section 202 of Public Law 94-305 (15 U.S.C. 
634b) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``and the international 
        economy'' after ``economy'';
            (2) in paragraph (9), by striking ``complete'' and 
        inserting ``compete''; and
            (3) in paragraph (12), by striking ``serviced-disabled'' 
        and inserting ``service-disabled''.
    (b) Duties.--Section 203(a) of Public Law 94-305 (15 U.S.C. 634c) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) represent the views and interests of small businesses 
        before foreign governments and international entities for the 
        purpose of contributing to regulatory and trade initiatives 
        which may affect small businesses.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 8, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          This Schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
          the  consolidated  balance  sheet as at May 3,  1997  and the  related
          consolidated  statement of operations  for the thirteen weeks ended on
          May 3, 1997 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference  to such
          financial statements.



</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0000879123
<NAME>         Goody's Family Clothing, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000          
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Jan-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                Feb-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  May-03-1997
<CASH>                         29,579
<SECURITIES>                    1,461                         
<RECEIVABLES>                       0                     
<ALLOWANCES>                        0                     
<INVENTORY>                   142,315                     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              186,507                     
<PP&E>                        134,666                     
<DEPRECIATION>                 45,816                     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                278,802                     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         136,325                    
<BONDS>                           871              
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0              
<PREFERRED>                         0              
<COMMON>                       27,016              
<OTHER-SE>                    102,417              
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  278,802              
<SALES>                       190,057              
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              190,057              
<CGS>                         135,080              
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  47,245              
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0           
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                125           
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 8,093           
<INCOME-TAX>                    3,035           
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             5,058           
<DISCONTINUED>                      0           
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0           
<CHANGES>                           0           
<NET-INCOME>                    5,058           
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    0.30           
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0.30           
        
<PAGE>


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

IN RE: DESIGNATION OF 

ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE OF THE 

CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE COURT 

OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY 

COUNTY, FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

: No. 389 

COMMON PLEAS JUDICIAL 

CLASSIFICATION 

ORDER

PER CURIAM 

Whereas, Judge Jill E. Rangos, has honorably served as Administrative Judge of 

the Criminal Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Fifth Judicial 

District since January 2, 2019; and 

Whereas, Judge Rangos has decided to step down as Administrative Judge. 

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2024, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

This Court's Order of December 24, 2018, designating the Honorable Jill E. 

Rangos as Administrative Judge of the Criminal Division of the Court of Common Pleas 

of Allegheny County, Fifth Judicial District, is vacated, effective September 3, 2024. 

In accord with Pa.R.J.A. No.706(d), the Honorable Bruce R. Beemer is appointed 

Administrative Judge of the Criminal Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny 

County, Fifth Judicial District, to serve for a term of three years or at the pleasure of this 

Court until such time as this Court by subsequent order appoints a new administrative 

judge. This appointment shall take effect on September 3, 2024.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HomePatient, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph F. Furlong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

This Certification is executed as of November 14, 2003.

                                            /s/ Joseph F. Furlong
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Joseph F. Furlong
                                            Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2016202EN.01017301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/173 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/173

---

Article 292

The Council shall adopt recommendations. It shall act on a proposal from the Commission in all cases where the Treaties provide that it shall adopt acts on a proposal from the Commission. It shall act unanimously in those areas in which unanimity is required for the adoption of a Union act . The Commission, and the European Central Bank in the specific cases provided for in the Treaties, shall adopt recommendations.

---
# L_2012112EN.01001001.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

TREATY

TREATY

BETWEEN

BETWEEN

THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA, THE CZECH REPUBLIC, THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, IRELAND, THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC, THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS, THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG, THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY, THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA, THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS, THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA, THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND, THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC, ROMANIA, THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA, THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND, THE KINGDOM OF SWEDEN, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND

THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA, THE CZECH REPUBLIC, THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, IRELAND, THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC, THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS, THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG, THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY, THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA, THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS, THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA, THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND, THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC, ROMANIA, THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA, THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND, THE KINGDOM OF SWEDEN, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND

(MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION)

MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

AND

AND

THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 4

This Treaty, drawn up in a single original in the Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Irish, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish languages, the texts in each of these languages being equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the Italian Republic, which will transmit a certified copy to each of the Governments of the other Signatory States.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION, INCLUDED
IN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      284,844
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        613
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          35,940
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         6,457
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 327,854
<COMMON>                                        11,045
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       97,380
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             10,736
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 119,161
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               62
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           125,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               1,500
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  82,131
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  327,854
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      241,936
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             9,051
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     206,939
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     206,939
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         34,997
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 649
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  26,595
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        11,221
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,374
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          4
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   15,370
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        10,604
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          32,256
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39


</TABLE>
Will industrial hemp be considered an approved feedstock for biofuel production? Also, will industrial hemp be considered an approved feedstock for the use in animal feeds? I appreciate your time! Have a wonderful day!

Abundant blessings,

Analilia Gomez
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1472 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1472

  To rename the Homestead National Monument of America near Beatrice, 
          Nebraska, as the Homestead National Historical Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2019

Mr. Smith of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To rename the Homestead National Monument of America near Beatrice, 
          Nebraska, as the Homestead National Historical Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HOMESTEAD NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    (a) In General.--The first section of the Act of March 19, 1936 (16 
U.S.C. 450u), is amended by striking ``designated'' and all that 
follows through the end and inserting ``designated the `Homestead 
National Historical Park'.''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the unit of the National 
Park System known as ``The Homestead National Monument of America'' 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Homestead National 
Historical Park''.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 20, 2015

No. 04-14-00807-CV

Brad and Randi AERY, and the House Intervenors Lloyd House, Robert Eugene House, 

Magdalen House, Judith Ann House, Wayne House, Jimmy R. House, Edna Pawelek Ulbrich, 

Peter Pawelek, Jesse Pawelek, Ruby Pawelek Schumacher, Elizabeth Pawalek Reigh, Roy 

Mitchell Pawelek, Darlene Robinson Williams, Diane Fischer Casey, Mary Kay Fischer Adams 

and Arley House,

Appellants

v.

Hoskins, Inc., et alAppellee/s

HOSKINS, INC., et al,

Appellees

From the 36th Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas

Trial Court No. M-12-0045-CV-A

Starr Boldrick Bauer, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Kulka Appellees Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been 

received and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the 

Appellees brief is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to May 20, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Peter Earl Hosey

Ellen Mitchell

C. David Kinder

Rosemarie Kanusky

Daniel Pozza

David William Navarro

Jason Allen Newman

Julia Wommack Mann
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-11229

Summary Calendar

_____________________

FREDRICK RANSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TRAVIS McPHERSON, ET AL.,

Defendants,

TRAVIS McPHERSON; DICKENS DETENTION CENTER,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(5:95-CV-182)

_________________________________________________________________ June 10, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Fredrick Ranson, # 705952, appeals an adverse summary judgment

in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. He contends first

that he was denied due process by being placed in administrative

segregation without a hearing; and second, that the defendants were- 2 -

deliberately indifferent and failed to protect him from assault by

another inmate.

“[A]dministrative segregation, without more, does not

constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally cognizable liberty

interest.” L uken v. Scott

, 71 F.3d 192, 193 (5th Cir. 1995), cert.

denied

,

___ U.S.

___, 116 S. Ct. 1690 (1996); see also Pichardo v.

Kinker

, 73 F.3d 612, 613 (5th Cir. 1996) (absent extraordinary

circumstances, continued confinement in administrative segregation

does not violate the Due Process Clause).

Ranson makes only conclusionary allegations and does not point

to any summary judgment evidence which creates a material fact

issue as to whether Warden McPherson was deliberately indifferent

to his need for pr otection from a substantial risk of harm. S ee

Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 834 (1994).

And, the detenti on center and McPherson in his official

capacity are not persons under § 1983. S ee Will v. Michigan Dep’t

of State Police , 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989).

Finally, we exercise our discretion not to consider Ranson’s

due process claim arising out of the assessment of his medical

bills from his trust-fund account because it is raised for the

first time on appeal. E .g.

, Douglass v. United Services Auto.

Ass’n

, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); United States

v. Calverley

, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert.

denied , ___ U.S. ___, 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995).- 3 - AFFIRMED
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VII

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

CHAPTER 3

APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

Article 116

(ex Article 96 TEC)

(ex Article 96 TEC)

Where the Commission finds that a difference between the provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States is distorting the conditions of competition in the internal market and that the resultant distortion needs to be eliminated, it shall consult the Member States concerned.

If such consultation does not result in an agreement eliminating the distortion in question, the European, Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall issue the necessary directives. Any other appropriate measures provided for in the Treaties may be adopted.

---
# EUR-Lex - 21973A0722(03) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 21973A0722(03)

**Additional Agreement concerning the validity, for the Principality of Liechtenstein, of the Agreement between the Member States of the European Coal and Steel Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 **

*
Official Journal L 350 , 19/12/1973 P. 0029 - 0032 Greek special edition: Chapter 11 Volume 6 P. 0053 Spanish special edition: Chapter 11 Volume 5 P. 0052 Portuguese special edition Chapter 11 Volume 5 P. 0052 *

ADDITIONAL AGREEMENT concerning the validity, for the Principality of Liechtenstein, of the Agreement between the Members States of the European Coal and Steel Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972

THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM,

THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK,

THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY,

THE FRENCH REPUBLIC,

IRELAND,

THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC,

THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG,

THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS,

THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY, and

THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND,

being members of the European Coal and Steel Community,

THE SWISS CONFEDERATION, and

THE PRINCIPALITY OF LIECHTENSTEIN,

WHEREAS by the Treaty of 29 March 1923 the Principality of Liechtenstein and Switzerland constitute a customs union and whereas that Treaty does not confer validity for the Principality of Liechtenstein on all the provisions of the Agreement between the Member States of the European Coal and Steel Community and the Swiss Confederation signed on 22 July 1972;

WHEREAS the Principality of Liechtenstein has expressed the desire that all the provisions of that Agreement should apply to it,

HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the Member States of the European Coal and Steel Community and the Swiss Confederation signed on 22 July 1972 shall likewise apply to the Principality of Liechtenstein.

Article 2

For the purpose of applying the Agreement referred to in Article 1 and without modifying its bilateral nature between the Member States of the Community and Switzerland, the Principality of Liechtenstein may cause its interests to be represented through a representative within the Swiss delegation to the Joint Committee.

Article 3

This additional Agreement will be approved by Switzerland, the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Member States of the Community in accordance with their own procedures. It shall enter into force at the same time as the Agreement referred to in Article 1 and shall continue to apply for so long as the Treaty of 29 March 1923 remains in force.

Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den toogtyvende juli nitten hundrede og tooghalvfjerds.

Geschehen zu Brüssel am zweiundzwanzigsten Juli neunzehnhundertzweiundsiebzig.

Done at Brussels on this twenty-second day of July in the year one thousand nine hundred and seventy-two.

Fait à Bruxelles, le vingt-deux juillet mil neuf cent soixante-douze.

Fatto a Bruxelles, il ventidue luglio millenovecentosettantadue.

Gedaan te Brussel, de tweeëntwintigste juli negentienhonderdtweeënzeventig.

Utferdiget i Brussel, tjueandre juli nitten hundre og syttito.

>PIC FILE= "T0005385">

>PIC FILE= "T0005386">