alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VII

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

CHAPTER 2

TAX PROVISIONS

Article 111

(ex Article 91 TEC)

(ex Article 91 TEC)

Where products are exported to the territory of any Member State, any repayment of internal taxation shall not exceed the internal taxation imposed on them whether directly or indirectly.

---
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2011-0027

 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM127AD

777-78A0065,R1 --- 1/29/09

777-78A0065--- 6/23/08

777-78-0071,R1 --- 9/8/10

777-78-0071--- 11/25/09

777-78-0082--- 11/9/11

777 MPD SECTION 9, D622W001-9-- OCTOBER 2014

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           390,616
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           12,801
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             12,865
<EQUITIES>                                      62,707
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 466,124
<CASH>                                          36,620
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 811,709
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             53,821
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 213,277
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 55,188
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,429
<OTHER-SE>                                     303,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   811,709
<PREMIUMS>                                     768,042
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             21,208
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  31,419
<BENEFITS>                                     614,118
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           180,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,281
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,348
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,933
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,933
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

The following is a list of the active subsidiaries of the Company showing the
jurisdiction of incorporation and the percentage of voting securities owned by
the Company or by wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company as of March 31, 2000:

                                             JURISDICTION   PERCENTAGE
                                                  OF        OF VOTING
NAME OF CORPORATION                          INCORPORATION  SECURITIES
-------------------                          -------------  ----------

Barbara Gould S.A.                           France             100%
Carter-Wallace, N.S. Inc.                    Delaware           100%
Carter-Wallace, O.S. Inc.                    Delaware           100%
Carter-Wallace Limited                       England            100%
Carter-Wallace (Australia) Pty, Limited      Australia          100%
Carter-Wallace, S.A.                         Mexico             100%
Carter-Wallace FSC Corp.                     Virgin Islands     100%
Carter-Horner Inc.                           Canada             100%
Icart, S.A.                                  Spain              100%
International Biological Laboratories, Inc.  Maryland            95%
Laboratoires Fumouze, S.A.                   France             100%
Sante Beaute S.A.                            France             100%
Sofibel S.A.R.L.                             France             100%
S.p.A. Italiana Laboratori Bouty             Italy              100%
Technogenetics S.r.l.                        Italy              100%
Tripharma S.A.R.L.                           France             100%


All of the above subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial
statements of the Company.
**Exhibit 15**
Goody’s Family Clothing, Inc.Knoxville, Tennessee
We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim condensedconsolidated financial information of Goody’s Family Clothing, Inc. andSubsidiaries as of and for the periods ended July 31, 2004 and August 2, 2003as indicated in our report dated August 18, 2004; because we did not perform anaudit, we expressed no opinion on that information.
We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in yourQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2004, isincorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-32357, 33-51210,33-68520, 333-00052 and 333-09595 on Form S-8.
We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) underthe Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the RegistrationStatements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared orcertified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPAtlanta, GeorgiaAugust 18, 2004
17
# C_2016202EN.01031901.xml

| | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/319 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/319

---

PROTOCOL (No 34)

ON SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR GREENLAND

Sole Article

1.   The treatment on import into the Union of products subject to the common organisation of the market in fishery products, originating in Greenland, shall, while complying with the mechanisms of the internal market organisation, involve exemption from customs duties and charges having equivalent effect and the absence of quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent effect if the possibilities for access to Greenland fishing zones granted to the Union pursuant to an agreement between the Union and the authority responsible for Greenland are satisfactory to the Union.

2.   All measures relating to the import arrangements for such products, including those relating to the adoption of such measures, shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 43 of the Treaty establishing the European Union.

---
Agricultural Marketing Service, Commodity Procurement Staff

1400 Independence Ave., SW, Room 3522-S, STOP 0239

Washington, DC 20250-0239

Voice 202.720.4517 Fax 202.720.5871

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

DATE: September 2, 2014

USDA SALMON PURCHASE PROGRAM ANNOUNCED:

The U.S. Department of Agriculture today announced plans to purchase canned pink salmon

(100198) for surplus removal.

An Invitation for Bid (solicitation) will be issued in the near future for deliveries October 16, 

2014, through January 31, 2015. All offers must be submitted electronically through the WebBased Supply Chain Management (WBSCM) website at -

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid=WBSCM. Offers submitted by any

means other than WBSCM will be considered non-responsive.

Offerors are urged to review all documents as they pertain to this program, including the AMS

Master Solicitation for Commodity Procurements, dated April 2014; Supplement 507 to the

AMS Master Solicitation for the Purchase of Salmon Products, dated April 2014; and the

Qualification Requirements for Prospective Vendors, dated June 2014. These documents are

available on the AMS Commodity Procurement website at

www.ams.usda.gov/commoditypurchasing.

Offerors must read all terms of the applicable Solicitation when it is issued. To receive electronic

(e-mail) notification of the issuance of these solicitations, see the “Subscribe to AMS CP News

(link)” available on the AMS Commodity Procurement website. Inquiries may be made by

telephoning (202) 720-4517 or addressing the Contracting Officer, USDA/AMS Commodity

Procurement Staff, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, STOP 0239, Washington, DC 20250-0256.

An electronic version of this Purchase Announcement can be obtained through the World Wide

Web via the Commodity Procurement Home Page at:

http://www.ams.usda.gov/commoditypurchasing
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XI

THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND

THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND

Article 162

(ex Article 146 TEC)

(ex Article 146 TEC)

In order to improve employment opportunities for workers in the internal market and to contribute thereby to raising the standard of living, a European Social Fund is hereby established in accordance with the provisions set out below; it shall aim to render the employment of workers easier and to increase their geographical and occupational mobility within the Union, and to facilitate their adaptation to industrial changes and to changes in production systems, in particular through vocational training and retraining.

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-86,442-01

EX PARTE RONNIE LEE DAWSON JR. , Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 22806 IN THE 336 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM FANNIN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of manufacture or

delivery of controlled substance and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his 

conviction.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because counsel did not investigate whether the offense occurred within a drug free zone. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
2

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make specific findings of fact

determining the specific location of this offense and the distance between where the offense occurred

and the drug free zone alleged in the indictment. The trial court shall also make any other findings

of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s

claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: April 5, 2017

Do not publish
Exhibit 10.10
 A. M. CASTLE & CO
2008 RESTRICTED STOCK, STOCK OPTION AND EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
(amended and restated as of March 5, 2009)
 I. GENERAL
 Purpose
       Effective Date.
 Definitions.
 Board
 Code
 Committee
 Director
 Equity Performance Award
 Fair Market Value
 Participant




---



##### 



Related Company
 Restricted Period
 Restricted Stock
 Stock
 Stock Option
 Subsidiary
 Administration.
 Participation.
 Shares Subject to the 2008 Plan.
 Compliance with Applicable Laws and Withholding Taxes.
 2




---



##### 



Transferability.
 Employment and Shareholder Status.
 Adjustments to Number of Shares Subject to the 2008 Plan.
 Agreement with Company.
 Amendment and Termination of 2008 Plan.
 II. INCENTIVE STOCK OPTIONS
 Definitions.
 3




---



##### 



Eligibility.
 Price.
 Exercise. provided, however,
 Option Expiration Date.
     III. NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS
 Definition.
 Eligibility.
 4




---



##### 



Price. provided however,
 Exercise. provided, however,
 Option Expiration Date.
      IV. RESTRICTED STOCK
 Definition.
 Eligibility.
 5




---



##### 



Terms and Conditions of Awards.
       V. EQUITY PERFORMANCE AWARDS
 Definition.
 Eligibility.
 Terms and Conditions of Awards.
  6




---



##### 



7
# C_2016202EN.01039801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/398 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/398

---

Article 24

The rights of the child

1.   Children shall have the right to such protection and care as is necessary for their well-being. They may express their views freely. Such views shall be taken into consideration on matters which concern them in accordance with their age and maturity.

2.   In all actions relating to children, whether taken by public authorities or private institutions, the child's best interests must be a primary consideration.

3.   Every child shall have the right to maintain on a regular basis a personal relationship and direct contact with both his or her parents, unless that is contrary to his or her interests.

---
#### Thomas Browarek, Individually and as Father and Natural Guardian of Michael Browarek, an Infant, Appellant, v Raymond Pfalzer et al., Appellants, and George Coniber et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants George Coniber and Margaret Coniber, the owners of the field where the accident occurred. There is no evidence to suggest that they knew or should have known of the necessity to control the conduct of those on their premises. Further, there is no showing that the Conibers were aware of any unreasonable risk to others created by the muddy condition of the property *(see, Goslin v La Mora,*137 AD2d 941). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Tv\e <S>ta^b <^^T&x.as, ^^^eAV^ FILED /N

E^*T^ Botor Coonta ,Tocols, apr 17 2015

W v^vV cR £ee*c*orc£- Cv\^~ ^^V^^coo^ mW^^ Y>*r cF

-20V5 cxrsd. W udQ£*V\: >r^ceA\iecX dxp A-Y^o vjjcVvV V^ Vr& mcnArGDm mnta

KXaxc3^7e.)'2o\co. (XppeJUicxsrte dud. >Po\: o\XA^CGaAx\ ceG€jiv/c-VV^^^^

^VArSv ^VAe. \^€3n\\o^v\ P^^ipeLVcxsnVOs^s -for A'V^ (Ldlx^At Ao -Qnc sp^cicV Cdn^Stejrcecx&r* \o V<^^ a^glc^t -VVNat (as o9 Vnc d-a3re, o£ -\VS\s vnoWao,

^>cxcxe i-
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Paul Genova, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul Genova
Paul Genova
President, Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2008

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00673-CV

Oscar REYES, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

Roberto M. BARRASA,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-04799

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Roberto M. Barrasa, recover his costs of this appeal 

from appellant, Oscar Reyes, Jr.

SIGNED September 11, 2013.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
#### Paul Guarino, Appellant, v Exide Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Reader’s Digest Association, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), entered August 16, 1989, which, upon the granting of the motion by the defendant third-party plaintiff for judgment as a matter of law at the close of the plaintiff’s case, is in favor of the defendant third-party plaintiff and against the plaintiff.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, and giving him the benefit of every inference which reasonably could be drawn therefrom *(see, Schimmenti v Ply Gem Indus.,*156 AD2d 658; *McCloud v Marcantonio,*106 AD2d 493), we find that there was no rational process by which the jury could have returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff *(see generally, Blum v Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.,*292 NY 241; *Dooley v Skodnek,*138 AD2d 102). The evidence presented by the plaintiff totally failed to establish that the defendant third-party plaintiff was in any way responsible for his injuries, and the jury could have found for the plaintiff only by improperly resorting to sheer speculation and conjecture *(see, Grillias v D’Arrigo Bros. Co.,*144 AD2d 638; *Hylick v Halweil,*112 AD2d 400). Inasmuch as the plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case of liability, the Supreme Court acted properly in granting the motion for judgment as a matter of law made at the close of his case *(see, e.g., Schimmenti v Ply Gem Indus., supra; Leiner v Howard’s Appliance,*104 AD2d 634). Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.