alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11.1

           SUNRISE INTERNATIONAL LEASING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         PER SHARE EARNINGS COMPUTATIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three Months Ended             Nine Months Ended
                                               December 31, 1999              December 31, 1999
                                          --------------------------      --------------------------
                                              1999           1998             1999           1998
                                          -----------     ----------      -----------     ----------

<S>                                       <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Basic Earnings Per Share:

   Weighted average number of
     common shares outstanding             6,634,000       7,585,000       7,050,000       7,736,000
                                          ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========

       Net income                         $  356,000      $  941,000      $2,275,000      $2,444,000
                                          ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========
       Net income per common and
         common equivalent share          $     0.05      $     0.12      $     0.32      $     0.32
                                          ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========

Diluted Earnings Per Share:

   Weighted average number of              6,634,000       7,585,000       7,050,000       7,736,000
   Common stock equivalents
     from assumed exercise of
     options and warrants                    507,000          40,000         403,000          31,000
                                          ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------
       Total shares                        7,141,000       7,625,000       7,453,000       7,767,000
                                          ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========

       Net income                         $  356,000      $  941,000      $2,275,000      $2,444,000
                                          ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========

       Net income per common
         and common equivalent share      $     0.05      $     0.12      $     0.31      $     0.31
                                          ==========      ==========      ==========      ==========
</TABLE>

Net income per common and common equivalent share is computed using the weighted
average number of shares outstanding during each period.
CASE NOS. 06-14-00074-CR 

In The 

COURT OF APPEALS 

SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT TEXARKANA 

TYRONE DENARD ANDERSON, Appellant 

VS. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court 

ofHuntCoun~,Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 29,512 

Honorable Richard A. Beacom, Jr., Judge Presiding 

STATE'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STATE'S 

BRIEF 

NOBLE DAN WALKER, JR. 

District Attorney, in and for 

Hunt County, Texas 

STEVE LILLEY 

Assistant District Attorney 

State Bar Number- 24046293 

P.O. Box 441 

4th Floor, Hunt County Courthouse 

Greenville, Texas 75401 

Telephone Number- (903) 408-4180 

Facsimile Number- (903) 408-4296 

Email: slilley@huntcounty.net 

ACCEPTED

06-14-00074-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

4/17/2015 11:51:58 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/17/2015 11:51:58 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
STATE'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STATE'S 

BRIEF 

Comes now, The State of Texas, and files this, her First Motion for 

Extension of Time to File State's Brief. 

I. 

The current filing deadline for the State's brief was April 8, 2014. 

II. 

The State requests this extension of time to her file her brief due to 

an accidental oversight of the fact that Appellant had filed a pro se brief 

with this court. The State was informed by the former appellate attorney in 

the cause Katherine Ferguson that she intended to file an Anders brief in 

this case. The State was later given a copy of the Anders brief for its 

records on or about December 3, 2014. On April 13, 2015, the attorney 

responsible for the jury trial and any appeal in this cause was made aware 

that Appellant had filed a pro se brief several months later. The State 

sincerely apologizes for this mistake. 

Ill. 

After a review of Appellant's handwritten brief, the State requests this 

honorable court for an extension of one month from the date of the filing of 

this request for extension, that is May 15, 2015. 

2 
IV. 

The State has made no previous requests for extensions to file her 

brief in this case. 

V. 

For the reasons stated hereinabove, it is respectfully requested that 

this Court grant the State of Texas until May 15, 2015, to file her brief. 

R.es,ctfull/bmitted, 

/j,m7# 

/Steve Lilley 

Assistant District Attorney 

Hunt County, Texas 

P.O. Box 441 

Greenville, Texas 75403-0441 

Phone: 903/408-4180 

Fax: 903/408-4296 

Email: slilley@huntcounty.net 

3 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

This is to certify that a true copy of this Motion to Extend Time to File 

State's Brief has been forwarded to Appell~t,fl ating R o se by mailing him 

a copy at the address provided in his~riet.; .~ 

. / / ;jy 

/ Steve Lilley 

4
Sait 

4-9 

Douglas 

, J. 

J. 

J. 

Pickering 

The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5). 

Accordingly, we approve attorney Kenneth H. Hoch's resignation. SCR 

98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted. 

It is so ORDERED. 

isee-ac CA. 

Hardesty 

bsot 

Parraguirre 

V71 

Gibbons 

cc: David A. Clark, Bar Counsel 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

Kenneth H. Hoch 

Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Randall K. Gausman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Tut Systems Inc., on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Tut Systems, Inc.



Date: June 10, 2004



By:

/s/ Randall K. GausmanRandall K. Gausman,Vice-President, Finance and Administration, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.2

          1996 Stock Option Plan, Administrative Rules and Agreement under
          which officers of the Company are eligible to receive options to
          purchase an aggregate of 1,607,100 shares (restated for the 2-for-1
          stock split effective February 1998 and the 10 percent common stock
          dividends effective in 1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996) of the Company's
          $2.50 par value common stock. This 1996 Stock Option Plan,
          Administrative Rules and Agreement are incorporated by reference from
          Form 10-Q of Brenton Banks, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30,
          1996.
     44
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DYLAN RANDOLPH WOODWARD, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-2720

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 30, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota 

County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and

Daniel Muller, Assistant Public Defender, 

Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we 

find no error with Dylan Woodward's judgment or sentence and affirm. We write only to 

correct a scrivener's error on Mr. Woodward's Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet. 

Mr. Woodward was found guilty by jury verdict, but his scoresheet incorrectly indicates 
- 2 -

that the charges were resolved by plea. On remand, the trial court shall correct this 

error. 

Affirmed; remanded for correction of scrivener's error.

MORRIS, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                    AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                                885
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     250,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  539,386
<PP&E>                                            845,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                     28,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,407,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,774,038
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           43,872
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,122,772)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,407,394
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  434,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  5,172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (439,683)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (439,683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (439,683)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.010)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.010)


</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 105 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1569 

[Report No. 116–142] 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff and Yuma to 

the list of locations in which court shall be held in the judicial district 

for the State of Arizona. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2019 

Mr. O’HALLERAN (for himself, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

GOSAR, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. GALLEGO, and Mrs. LESKO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

JULY 9, 2019 

Additional sponsor: Mr. STANTON

JULY 9, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1569 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff 

and Yuma to the list of locations in which court shall 

be held in the judicial district for the State of Arizona. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1569 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISTRICT COURTS IN THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

4 FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA. 

5 Section 82 of title 28, United States Code, is amend6 ed by striking ‘‘Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, and Tucson’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘Flagstaff, Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tuc8 son, and Yuma’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 105 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1569 

[Report No. 116–142] 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to add 

for the State of Arizona. which court shall be held in the judicial district Flagstaff and Yuma to the list of locations in 

JULY 9, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
10-K
| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or                15(d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March              28, 2007  |   | s/George              J. Kophage                                          |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date                         |   | Vice                President and Chief Financial                Officer  |

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                                Subsidiaries of Registrant
                                --------------------------

        The Company has the following subsidiaries, all of which are wholly
owned and included in the consolidated financial statements.


                                                          State or Country
Name of Subsidiary                                        of Incorporation
------------------                                        ----------------

Brush Wellman GmbH                                        Germany

Brush Wellman (Japan), Ltd.                               Japan

Brush Wellman Limited                                     England

Brush Wellman (Singapore), Pte Ltd.                       Singapore

Circuits Processing Technology Inc.                       California

Technical Materials, Inc.                                 Ohio

Williams Advanced Materials Inc.                          New York

Williams Advanced Materials Pte Ltd.                      Singapore
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6920

DONALD MAZARIEGOS-VICENTE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00543-AJT-MSN)

Submitted: November 30, 2017 Decided: December 22, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Cipriano Mazariegos-Vicente, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donald Cipriano Mazariegos-Vicente seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When 

the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of 

the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that MazariegosVicente has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
# C_2016202EN.01019801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/198 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/198

---

Article 356

(ex Article 312 TEC)

(ex Article 312 TEC)

This Treaty is concluded for an unlimited period.

---
# Date: 

# \'rv.u~ 1 

# ~ 

# /t )( /21> 1) 

# cd 3 .UC-prn Meeting: 

# ftf I Rule(s) Discussed: 

# o"JJyfvWritten Materials? Yes/No 

# Name Or ganization 1 }0()/1



# OM Phone Number



# L/I~-421-4LDIQJ :::s 

# g c **~** 

# "' QJ Q QJ 

### c 0 N 0 

### 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 

### 2000 2005 2010 -+- Chicago-Naperville, IL -I N -WI 

## -~ **~~Cf\.e_ <>~~<.J-**  **~** 

# M \ '=-l 

# 'cal

-z.c:.\



# ~ Designations Made 2015 2020 -st. Louis-St. Charles-Farmington, MO-IL -Denver-Boulder-G reeley-Fort Collins-Loveland

, CO-+-Grea te r Co n necticut, C T

- Washington, DC -M D-VA Upper Green R iv er Ba sin, WY Tampa -S t. Peter sbu rg-Clearwat e r

, FL - Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN San Diego County, CA Baton Rouge

, LA 

## EPA 2025
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HomePatient, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
F. Furlong, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

This Certification is executed as of May 6, 2004.

                                            /s/ Joseph F. Furlong, III
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Joseph F. Furlong, III
                                            Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Finlay Enterprises, Inc., (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect to
the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 29,
2006 (the "Report") that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: June 8, 2006

                                        /s/ Arthur E. Reiner
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Arthur E. Reiner
                                        Chairman, President and Chief Executive
                                        Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
```
JOSEPH SHORT,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1401

Opinion filed April 8, 2015.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Joseph Short, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5).

ROWE, MARSTILLER, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
FEE TABLE – UNITED STATES WAREHOUSE ACT (Effective 10/1/2019) 

WOOL

License 

Action 

Fee 

Service 

License 

Fee 

Inspection Fee Annual User Fees 

Annual Fee Licensed Capacities 

$ 90 $40 $19 for each 

100,000 

$19 for each 100,000 pounds, or fraction thereof 

 pounds $750 MIN 

 MIN $ 190 

 MAX $1900
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |

|    |                                                                                                                             |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. |  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
|   | /s/    Carl R. Ice |   | /s/    Julie A. Piggott |
|   |          Carl R. Ice         President and         Chief Executive Officer |   |          Julie A. Piggott         Executive Vice President and         Chief Financial Officer |