alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01014901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/149 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/149

---

Article 224

(ex Article 191, second subparagraph, TEC)

(ex Article 191, second subparagraph, TEC)

The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, by means of regulations, shall lay down the regulations governing political parties at European level referred to in Article 10(4) of the Treaty on European Union and in particular the rules regarding their funding.

---
No. 01- 14 -00861- CR

In the Court of Appeals

For the

First District of Texas

At Houston



No. 1388920

In the 184 th District Court of Harris County, Texas




### S EGISMUNDO 

### G ONZALEZ

Appellant

v. 

### THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee


STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

IN WHICH TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF



TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:

COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, in accordance with Rules 10.5(b)(1)

and 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this motion for

extension of time in which to file the State’s brief in these cases, and, in support

thereof, presents the following:

1. In the 184 th district court of Harris County, Texas, cause 1388920

, the State of

Texas v. Segismundo Gonzalez, appellant, was convicted of theft.

2. He was assessed punishment of confinement for 17 years in the Institutional

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. ACCEPTED

01-14-00861-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/8/2015 5:56:03 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK3. The State’s brief wa s due on April 3 , 2015

.

4. A n extension of time in which to file the State’s brie f is requested until

March 18 , 2015

.

5. No previous extension s have been requested by the State.

6. The facts relied upon to explain the need for this extension are:

Since appellant filed his brief , I have filed briefs in cause numbers 14

- 14

- 00204

- CR and 14

- 14

- 00777

- CR. In addition to the present case, I have 3 briefs assigned to me, am recreating exhibits for an abatement hearing in cause

number 14

- 13

- 00767

- CR, and am preparing for trial on May 4 th , 2015 on the State of Texas v. Sidney Darrell in cause number 1421932 . Additionally, I assist trial court prosecutors with le gal questions on a daily basis. This motion is not sought for delay, but so that justice may be done.

WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant an ext ension of time

until March 9 , 2015 in which to file the State’s brief in this case.

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Abbie Miles

Abbie Miles Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 755

- 5826

TBC No. 24072240CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been mailed to the

appellant’s attorney at the following address on April 8, 2015 :

Leah M. Bo rg 874 Yorkchester No. 123
Houston, TX 77079

B org5 79@att.net

/s/ Abbie Miles

Abbie Miles Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas

Date: April 8, 2015
Goody's Family Clothing, Inc.
Knoxville, Tennessee

We have made a review, in accordance with standards  established by the American
Institute of Certified Public  Accountants,  of the unaudited  interim financial
information of Goody's Family  Clothing,  Inc. for the periods ended November 2,
1996 and October 28, 1995,  as indicated in our report dated  November 19, 1996;
because  we  did  not  perform  an  audit,  we  expressed  no  opinion  on  that
information.

We are aware  that our  report  referred  to above,  which is  included  in your
Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q for the  quarter  ended  November  2, 1996 , is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
33-51210, 33-68520, 333-00052 and 333-09595 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report,  pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the  Securities  Act of  1933,  is not  considered  a part  of the  Registration
Statement  prepared  or  certified  by an  accountant  or a report  prepared  or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
November 19, 1996
**EXHIBIT      21**

| NAME                OF SUBSIDIARY                       | STATE                OR COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                                    |                                             |
| Chattem                (U.K.) Limited                   | England                                          |
| HBA                Indemnity Insurance, Ltd.            | Cayman                Islands                    |
| Signal                Investment & Management Co.   | Delaware                                         |
| SunDex,                LLC                              | Tennessee                                        |
| Chattem                Global Consumer Products Limited | Ireland                                          |
| Chattem                (Canada) Corp.                   | Canada                                           |
| Chattem                Canada ULC                       | Canada                                           |
| Chattem                Canada                           | Canada                                           |
| Chattem                (Canada) Holdings, Inc.          | Delaware                                         |
June 26, 2015

Mr. Sean Finnerty 

Hamptons Aerial Photography 

5 Gracewood Ct. 

Hampton Bays, NY 11946 

Dear Mr. Finnerty: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your March 10, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0589), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32.1

|   | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 10, 2010 | By:    | /s/ John A. Hardy |   |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | John A. Hardy          |   |
|                    |   | Executive Chairman     |
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1449 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1449

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 3033 203rd Street in Olympia Fields, Illinois, as the ``Captain 
                    Robert L. Martin Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN ROBERT L. MARTIN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3033 203rd Street in Olympia Fields, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Captain Robert L. Martin Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain 
Robert L. Martin Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1449

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 3033 203rd Street in Olympia Fields, Illinois, as the ``Captain 
                    Robert L. Martin Post Office''.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus II Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Anthony R. Moore, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 12, 2006 |  | /s/ ANTHONY R. MOORE   
|                    |  | Anthony R. Moore       
|                    |  | Chairman               
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-1188EA

_____________ Howard Wayne Jones, * * Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Department of Correction, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: January 22, 1998

Filed: February 3, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, BRIGHT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. The court grants Howard Wayne Jones a c ertificate of appealability allowing an appeal fromthe district court's denial of Jones's fourth petition for a writ of habea s corpus. Because Jones attacks the execution of his state sentence, we consider Jones's petitionunder 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In our view, briefing by the parties will serve n o useful purpose and we now turn to the merits of Jones' s appeal. Having considered the record, we conclude Jones's contention that he is eligible for parole notwithstandin g three earlier felony convictions when he pleaded guilty in 1979 is without merit. See Schwindling v. Smith , 777 F.2d 431, 432-33 (8th Cir. 1985); Watson v. State , 609-2-

S.W.2d 673, 674 (Ark. Ct. App. 1 980). Even if we consider Jones's petition under 28 U.S. C. § 2254, we would reject his appeal because the district court correctl y dismissed his petition for abuse of the writ. We thus deny Jones's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm t he judgment of the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1526 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

200 Israel Road Southeast in Tumwater, Washington, as the ‘‘Eva G. 

Hewitt Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2019 

Mr. HECK (for himself, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. 

NEWHOUSE, Mrs. RODGERS of Washington, Mr. KILMER, Ms. JAYAPAL, 

Ms. SCHRIER, and Mr. SMITH of Washington) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 200 Israel Road Southeast in Tumwater, 

Washington, as the ‘‘Eva G. Hewitt Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EVA G. HEWITT POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 200 Israel Road Southeast in 

6 Tumwater, Washington, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Eva G. Hewitt Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1526 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Eva G. Hewitt Post 

5 Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

OFFICIAL BUSINESS a — --•-•• ^

STATE OF TEXAS_ •|3W

PENALTY FOR *

PRIVATE USE

%

2-fli.' tsS*^

CTJssE3srrsanp

2g w.r.BiTwmy PJTNEV BOWES

02 1M- $ 00.265 00042 79596 MAR 20 2015

sr^Si^^?i*4^^^is due in ,his court on

Monday, August 31, 2015. Abe, AC0Sta, Clerk

'US; >

-ami cv noenu M07FF

.'H'(rV!,gvvi-.r .,-..

1*1
EXHIBIT 31.2
IEA Income Fund XII, L.P.
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
     I, John Kallas, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income FundXII, L.P. (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on ourevaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: August 12, 2004
/s/ JOHN KALLAS
# C_2016202EN.01003201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/32

---

Article 28

(ex Article 14 TEU)

(ex Article 14 TEU)

1.   Where the international situation requires operational action by the Union, the Council shall adopt the necessary decisions. They shall lay down their objectives, scope, the means to be made available to the Union, if necessary their duration, and the conditions for their implementation.

If there is a change in circumstances having a substantial effect on a question subject to such a decision, the Council shall review the principles and objectives of that decision and take the necessary decisions.

2.   Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall commit the Member States in the positions they adopt and in the conduct of their activity.

3.   Whenever there is any plan to adopt a national position or take national action pursuant to a decision as referred to in paragraph 1, information shall be provided by the Member State concerned in time to allow, if necessary, for prior consultations within the Council. The obligation to provide prior information shall not apply to measures which are merely a national transposition of Council decisions.

4.   In cases of imperative need arising from changes in the situation and failing a review of the Council decision as referred to in paragraph 1, Member States may take the necessary measures as a matter of urgency having regard to the general objectives of that decision. The Member State concerned shall inform the Council immediately of any such measures.

5.   Should there be any major difficulties in implementing a decision as referred to in this Article, a Member State shall refer them to the Council which shall discuss them and seek appropriate solutions. Such solutions shall not run counter to the objectives of the decision referred to in paragraph 1 or impair its effectiveness.

---
# C_2016203EN.01002601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/26

---

Article 60

Potential users shall periodically inform the Agency of the supplies they require, specifying the quantities, the physical and chemical nature, the place of origin, the intended use, delivery dates and price terms, which are to form the terms and conditions of the supply contract which they wish to conclude.

Similarly, producers shall inform the Agency of offers which they are able to make, stating all the specifications, and in particular the duration of contracts, required to enable their production programmes to be drawn up. Such contracts shall be of not more than 10 years' duration save with the agreement of the Commission.

The Agency shall inform all potential users of the offers and of the volume of applications which it has received and shall call upon them to place their orders by a specified time limit.

When the Agency has received all such orders, it shall make known the terms on which it can meet them.

If the Agency cannot meet in their entirety all the orders received, it shall, subject to the provisions of Articles 68 and 69, share out the supplies proportionately among the orders relating to each offer.

Agency rules, which shall require approval by the Commission, shall determine the manner in which demand is to be balanced against supply.

---
#### In the Matter of the Petition of SMITH ENGINEERING COMPANY for a Writ of Mandamus Directed to the Honorable Charles N. Pray, District Judge of the United States District Court of Montana, and Said United States District Court of Montana.

No. 9343.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 18, 1939.

Sterling M. Wood, of Billings, Mont., and William H. Hunt and Wallace Sheehan, both of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition of Sterling M. Wood, that he and his associates be permitted to withdraw as counsel of record, and it appearing from said petition that the petitioner has assigned its right and interest in the subject matter of this litigation, and the assignee, J. B. Swartz, desiring that this matter be dismissed, ordered petition to withdraw granted, that the order to show cause heretofore issued be discharged and the petition for mandamus be dismissed.