alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-949]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

 [USITC SE-12-001]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: January 20, 2012 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote in Inv. No. 731-TA-703 (Third Review) (Furfuryl Alcohol 
from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its 
determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce 
on or before January 30, 2012.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: January 13, 2012.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 2012-949 Filed 1-13-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Abatement Order filed April 14, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00977-CV

____________

DONAL S. CLARK, Appellant

V.

24/7 GRILL, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 10th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-CV-1262

ABATEMENT ORDER

Notice was filed on March 25, 2015 that C. Michael Orr, part owner of 

appellee, is in bankruptcy. Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. According to the notice, on March 

20, 2015, Orr petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy protection in the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas under case number 15-10390. 

A bankruptcy suspends the appeal from the date when the bankruptcy petition is 

filed until the appellate court reinstates the appeal in accordance with federal law. 

Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal abated.
When a case has been suspended by a bankruptcy filing, a party may move 

the appellate court to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the 

bankruptcy court. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. If the bankruptcy court has lifted or 

terminated the stay, a certified copy of the order must be attached to the motion. Id. 

A party filing a motion to reinstate shall specify what further action, if any, is 

required from this court when the appeal is reinstated. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a).

For administrative purposes only, and without surrendering jurisdiction, the 

appeal is abated and treated as a closed case until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM
Order entered April 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00311-CV

HOUSTON INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP, LTD., ET AL., Appellants

V.

NATIONSBUILDERS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-06111

ORDER

The appellate record in this appeal is overdue. By letter dated April 21, 2014, court 

reporter Vielica Dobbins informs us that she has not yet received from appellants a complete 

designation of the portions of the proceedings to be included in the reporter’s record. We 

construe the letter as a motion for extension of time to file the record and GRANT the motion. 

We ORDER appellants to designate the necessary record no later than April 30, 2014 and 

ORDER Ms. Dobbins to file the record no later than June 2, 2014. We further ORDER Dallas 

County District Clerk Gary Fitzsimmons to file the clerk’s record no later than May 23, 2014.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order by electronic 

transmission to (1) Ms. Dobbins; (2) the Honorable Dale Tillery, Presiding Judge of the 134th 

Judicial District Court; (3) Mr. Fitzsimmons; and (4) the parties. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Autocam Corporation (the "Company") for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, as delivered on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John C. Kennedy, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 10, 2005                 /s/ John C. Kennedy
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John C. Kennedy
                                        President
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE III

EQUALITY

EQUALITY

Article 21

Non-discrimination

1.   Any discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation shall be prohibited.

2.   Within the scope of application of the Treaties and without prejudice to any of their specific provisions, any discrimination on grounds of nationality shall be prohibited.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART FIVE

THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

TITLE III

COOPERATION WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AND HUMANITARIAN AID

COOPERATION WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AND HUMANITARIAN AID

CHAPTER 3

HUMANITARIAN AID

Article 214

1.   The Union's operations in the field of humanitarian aid shall be conducted within the framework of the principles and objectives of the external action of the Union. Such operations shall be intended to provide ad hoc assistance and relief and protection for people in third countries who are victims of natural or man-made disasters, in order to meet the humanitarian needs resulting from these different situations. The Union's measures and those of the Member States shall complement and reinforce each other.

ad hoc

2.   Humanitarian aid operations shall be conducted in compliance with the principles of international law and with the principles of impartiality, neutrality and non-discrimination.

3.   The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish the measures defining the framework within which the Union's humanitarian aid operations shall be implemented.

4.   The Union may conclude with third countries and competent international organisations any agreement helping to achieve the objectives referred to in paragraph 1 and in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.

The first subparagraph shall be without prejudice to Member States' competence to negotiate in international bodies and to conclude agreements.

5.   In order to establish a framework for joint contributions from young Europeans to the humanitarian aid operations of the Union, a European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps shall be set up. The European Parliament and the Council, acting by means of regulations in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall determine the rules and procedures for the operation of the Corps.

6.   The Commission may take any useful initiative to promote coordination between actions of the Union and those of the Member States, in order to enhance the efficiency and complementarity of Union and national humanitarian aid measures.

7.   The Union shall ensure that its humanitarian aid operations are coordinated and consistent with those of international organisations and bodies, in particular those forming part of the United Nations system.

---
Order entered October 16, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01078-CR

ERIC ROSE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-55385-Y

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE III

EQUALITY

EQUALITY

Article 20

Equality before the law

Everyone is equal before the law.

---
# C_2016203EN.01003701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/37

---

Article 97

No restrictions based on nationality may be applied to natural or legal persons, whether public or private, under the jurisdiction of a Member State, where they desire to participate in the construction of nuclear installations of a scientific or industrial nature in the Community.

---
#### WILLIAM F. BENNETT *v.*BIRBARIE MARINE SALES, INC.

(AC 19391)

Foti, Hennessy and Pellegrino, Js.

Submitted on briefs June 14

officially released July 11, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32

Section 906 Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Bresler & Reiner, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officers of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/SIDNEY M. BRESLERSidney M. Bresler
Chief Executive Officer                   
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/DARRYL M. EDELSTEINDarryl M. Edelstein
Executive Vice PresidentFinance & CFO

Dated:
March 31, 2008

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1569 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1569

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff and Yuma to the 
list of locations in which court shall be held in the judicial district 
                        for the State of Arizona.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DISTRICT COURTS IN THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT FOR THE STATE OF 
ARIZONA.
    Section 82 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, and Tucson'' and inserting ``Flagstaff, 
Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson, and Yuma''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000013777
<NAME> BRADLEY REAL ESTATE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,434,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,818,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,545,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,421,000
<PP&E>                                   1,044,048,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              81,302,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             996,167,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,787,000
<BONDS>                                    444,822,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 86,802,000
<COMMON>                                   333,907,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  97,849,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               996,167,000
<SALES>                                    151,950,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           154,833,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,830,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            35,000,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          29,404,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             31,502,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                31,502,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Kathy Shaw v. Juanita Cesar Worrell

Appellate case number: 01-15-00165-CV

Trial court case number: 1056379

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

On February 19, 2015, appellant, Kathy Shaw, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of 

appeal in the trial court from the final judgment, signed on January 12, 2015. The trial 

court’s final judgment set a $10,000.00 supersedeas bond and permitted a writ of 

possession to be issued in this forcible detainer action if the appellant had not vacated the 

premises by January 31, 2015. On April 15, 2015, appellant filed an emergency motion 

for stay of execution, requesting that this Court stay execution of the judgment and allow 

appellant to stay in the premises until April 26, 2015, pending resolution of her appeal,

because she and her son have no other place to live at this time and because she already 

paid $716.00 for the supersedeas bond on February 12, 2015.

We have jurisdiction to issue writs only as necessary to enforce and protect our 

jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a) (West Supp. 2014). We may not, 

however, issue an injunction on wholly equitable grounds or to preserve the status quo or 

to protect a party from damage pending appeal. See Parsons v. Galveston County Emp. 

Credit Union, 576 S.W.2d 99, 99 (Tex. Civ. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1978, no writ).

Further, we may not stay the judgment of a county court in an eviction suit 

pending appeal unless, within 10 days of the signing of the judgment, the appellant files a 

supersedeas bond in an amount set by the county court. See TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 

24.007(a) (West Supp. 2014); Phillips v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., No. 03-11-00461-

CV, 2012 WL 424875, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin, Feb. 1, 2012, order). On March 16, 

2015, the trial clerk filed a notice stating that appellant had failed to pay the $23.00 fee 

for preparing the clerk’s record in this case, which has yet to be filed in this Court. 

However, appellant’s emergency motion states that she paid $716.00 for the supersedeas 

bond on February 12, 2015. Thus, based on the documents filed in this Court, there is no 

indication that appellant posted the $10,000.00 supersedeas bond set by the trial court 
within 10 days of the signing of the January 12, 2015 final judgment, which was January 

22, 2015.

Accordingly, we deny appellant’s emergency motion for stay of execution of the

judgment.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 

Date: April 16, 2015
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic
Report), I, Paul Genova, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |                                    
| | -----------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul Genova                    
| |                                    
| | Paul Genova                        
| | President, Chief
 Financial Officer
| | August 13, 2009                    

The foregoing certification
is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 11, 2010 

0608 

Order 

 

June 11, 2010 

140514-5 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140514-5 

 COA: 276423; 276904 

Wayne CC: 06-008941-01 

ARTHUR RONALD HAILEY, III, 06-008939-01 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed whether trial counsel was ineffective for any of the 

reasons asserted by the defendant. 

 The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys 

Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups 

interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court 

for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 30, 2019

t0422 

# Order

Clerk April 30, 2019

158219

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158219

COA: 342532

Ottawa CC: 12

- 036826

- FC

WILLIAM ALAN NICHOLSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2 018 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LANDRY'S SEAFOOD HOUSE- ) FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-1223 ) FRANK DE LA GRANA, an individual, ) and SIMON CANASI, an individual, ) ) Appellees. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed September 23, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Paul L. Huey, Judge. John H. Pelzer of Greenspoon Marder LLP, Fort Lauderdale, and Murray B. Silverstein, Brian R. Cummings, and Jacob L. Boehner of Greenspoon Marder LLP, Tampa , for Appellant. David M. Caldevilla of de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A., Tampa, and Kenneth G. Turkel, Shane B. Vogt, and Anthony Severino of Bajo, Cuva, Cohen & Turkel, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, 

### MORRIS , and 

### LUCAS , JJ., Concur.