alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-12-545-E October 10, 2012

Exemption No. 10639 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-1010

Ms. Michele Wassell Parent of Kayla Wassell

99 Lantana Street #55 Camarillo, CA 93010

Dear Ms. Wassell:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received July 9, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Kayla Wassell for an exemption fr om § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exempti on, if granted, would allow Kayla to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Kayla.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using2

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Kayla Wassell exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Kayla is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Kayla to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during us e of that CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Kayla’s parents or a caregiver accompanying her. Kayla Wassell may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind her. In addition, Kayla’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on October 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
An unpublis|

‘Supreme Court
oF
Nevapa,

900 BB

ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TOBY KREHBIEL, No. 67495

ve Appellant, E [ L E D

LINDSAY DULL, N/K/A LINDSAY
DARNELL, APR 21 2015

dent. TRACIE K. LINDEMAN
Responden CLERK,OF SUPREME COURT
ey.

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

When this pro se appeal was docketed, this court gave
appellant 40 days to file and serve the civil proper person appeal
statement. Appellant’s civil appeal statement was due in this court by
April 13, 2015. To date, appellant has failed to file the civil proper person
appeal statement or otherwise respond. to this court’s directive.

Accordingly, we conclude that appellant has abandoned this appeal, and

we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
: J.

Douglas 7 Cherry
ce: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge

Toby Krehbiel

Lindsay Dull

Carson City Clerk

15-32092
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00117-CR

Christopher Yarborough

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1313733D)

April 16, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

Dissent by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Sue Walker___________________

 Justice Sue Walker
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Citation 2002 Investment LLC and

Endeavor Energy Resources L.P.

,

Appellant s

,

v.

Occidental Permian, LTD., Occidental

Petroleum Corporation, Oxy USA, Oxy

USA WTP LP, and Rodeo Midland Basin,

LLC

,

Appellee s

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 087

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2017

- DCV0027 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is a petition for permissive appeal filed by Citation 2002

Investment LLC and Endeavor Energy Resources L.P. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 28.3. The petition is

GRANTED. Pursuant to Rule 28.3(k), a notice of appeal is deemed to have been file d by

Citation 2002 Investment LLC and Endeavor Energy Resources L.P.

, on the date of this order

and the appeal will be governed by the rules applicable to accelerated appeals. Citation 2002

I n vestment LLC and Endeavor Energy Resources L.P. i s directed to take all necessary steps to

cause the appellate record to be filed. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 34.5, 34.6. The clerk’s record and the

reporter’s record, if any, are due to be filed no later than March 11, 2021 . The Clerk of the Court

shall file a copy of this ord er with the trial court clerk. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 28.3(k).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 st day of March , 20 2 1.

PER CU R IAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Candelario, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Purple, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
OflTe: 4--/4-M>tS

ru^^^

fe//<?^

t.O, 8*x 12 ~5°S ,

Ssd2^

W172J15

e; -/J 7? -iiffn*&£ ^*7

few <^*/0

£&£--/

%cur d/L JLA* jth W^^eff"*^:
# C_2016202EN.01040401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/404 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/404

---

Article 50

Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence

No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again in criminal proceedings for an offence for which he or she has already been finally acquitted or convicted within the Union in accordance with the law.

---
Frank Crowley Courts Building, 133 North Riverfront Boulevard, LB-19 Dallas, Texas 75207-4399 (214) 653-3600 S USAN H AWK

C RIMINAL D ISTRICT A TTORNEY

D ALLAS C OUNTY

, T EXAS

November 23, 2015

Mr. John Brown, Chief Deputy Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals

P.O. Box 12308

Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711

Re: Appellate Cause No. AP-77,047;

Trial Court Cause No. F86-85539;

Kenneth Wayne Thomas v. The State of Texas

*** DEATH PENALTY CASE ***

Dear Mr. Brown:

On July 23, 2014, Kenneth Wayne Thomas was sentenced to death for the capital

murder of Mildred Finch. An appeal of his conviction is currently pending before the

Court.

On December 23, 2014, the Dallas County District C lerk’s Office filed a Clerk’s

Record regarding the Thomas case. This record is incomplete. On October 16, 2015, the

undersigned delivered a letter to the District Clerk’s Office requesting that a

supplemental clerk’s record be prepared containing a copy of the punishment jury charge

and certain identified motions. On October 21, 2015, the District Clerk’s Office prepared

a supplemental clerk’s record and transmitted that record to the Court. This supplemental

record is incomplete. Although it contains the motions identified in my October 16 th

letter, it does not contain the punishment charge. The punishment charge was

subsequently located. On November 2, 2015, the undersigned requested that the District

Clerk prepare and transmit a second supplemental record (one containing the punishment

charge) to the Court.

Today, the undersigned reviewed the District Clerk’s Office online database to

determine whether the second supplemental record (one containing the punishment

charge) ha d been transmitted to the Court. It appears that this record has not yet been

sent. The undersigned contacted the District Clerk ’ s Criminal Operations Manager and

requested yet again that this supplemental record be prepared and sent to the Court.

This letter is sent simply to keep the Court apprised of the undersigned ’ s

continued efforts to ensure that a complete record is transmitted to the Court in this case. AP-77,047

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 11/23/2015 2:17:29 PM

Accepted 11/23/2015 2:18:32 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERKFrank Crowley Courts Building, 133 North Riverfront Boulevard, LB

- 19 Dallas, Texas 75207

- 4399 (214) 653

- 3600

2 I f this second supplemental record is not transmitted by Monday, November 30, 2015, the

State m ay request intervention from the Court

.

Should you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me via

telephone or email.

Sincerely,

Christine Womble

Assistant District Attorney

State Bar No. 24035991

Frank Crowley Courts Building

133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB

- 19

Dallas, Texas 75207

- 4399

(214) 653

- 3625

(214) 653

- 3643 fax

CWomble@dallascounty.org

cc:

John Tatum (via email)

Michael Mowla (via email)
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
 DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(In thousands, except for ratio data)
 ThreeQuartersFiscal Years Ended
    
    
    EndedDecember 29,
    
    
    December 30,
    
    
    December 31,
    
    
    January 1,
    
    
    January 3,
    
    
    Quarter Ended2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    March 22, 2003Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes,
minority interests and equity
earnings
    
    $
    (55,340
    )
    
    $
    (73,422
    )
    
    $
    81,621
    
    
    $
    153,025
    
    
    $
    28,919
    
    
    $
    72,359Distributed income of equity method
investees
    
    
    439
    
    
    
    1,478
    
    
    
    2,040
    
    
    
    2,173
    
    
    
    2,606
    
    
    
    648Fixed charges from continuing
operations
    
    
    251,270
    
    
    
    225,728
    
    
    
    185,800
    
    
    
    186,296
    
    
    
    149,648
    
    
    
    27,122Earnings available for fixed charges
    
    $
    196,369
    
    
    $
    153,784
    
    
    $
    269,461
    
    
    $
    341,494
    
    
    $
    181,173
    
    
    $
    100,129Fixed charges from continuing
operations:Interest expense
    
    $
    190,143
    
    
    $
    169,719
    
    
    $
    134,926
    
    
    $
    142,998
    
    
    $
    116,921
    
    
    $
    19,246Amortization of debt expense and
discounts
    
    
    4,722
    
    
    
    4,996
    
    
    
    7,526
    
    
    
    9,505
    
    
    
    7,435
    
    
    
    374Assumed interest element included
in rent expense
    
    
    56,405
    
    
    
    51,013
    
    
    
    43,348
    
    
    
    33,793
    
    
    
    25,292
    
    
    
    7,502Total fixed charges from continuing
operations
    
    $
    251,270
    
    
    $
    225,728
    
    
    $
    185,800
    
    
    $
    186,296
    
    
    $
    149,648
    
    
    $
    27,122Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
(A)
    
    
    0.78
    X
    
    
    0.68
    X
    
    
    1.45
    X
    
    
    1.83
    X
    
    
    1.21
    X
    
    
    3.69
    X
 
 (A)
    
    Due to the Companys loss from continuing operations in both 2007 and 2006, the ratio of
earnings to fixed charges was less than 1:1. The Company must generate additional earnings of $54.9
million and $71.9 million to achieve a coverage ratio of 1:1 for 2007 and 2006, respectively.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

SAINT LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF

BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA D/B/A

ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL. AND ST.

LUKE'S HOSPITAL & HEALTH

NETWORK ,

 Petitioners

 v.

JOHN R. VIVIAN, JR., ESQ., MARTIN D.

COHEN, ESQ., COHEN & FEELEY, P.C.,

DR. JOHN SHANE, M.D., HARRY H.

MILLER, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE

OF REGINA C. MILLER, DECEASED,

 Respondents

 SAINT LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF

BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA D/B/A

ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL AND ST. LUKE'S

HOSPITAL & HEALTH NETWORK ,

 Petitioners

 v.

JOHN R. VIVIAN JR., ESQ., MARTIN D.

COHEN, ESQ., COHEN & FEELEY, P.C.,

DR. JOHN D. SHANE, M.D., ROBERT E.

HALL, JR. AND LESLIE A. HALL,

CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF

MARILYN J. HALL, DECEASED,

 Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 839 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

-------------------------------------
[839 MAL 2014] - 2

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
### February 29, 2016
EPA/ A DAMA Meeting on Prometon and Folpet Registration Reviews

Potomac Yards South Room S

- 9100

1:00 to 2:30 pm
Meeting Summary

Meeting Agenda

• See attached file.

Meeting Summary:

• OPP Staff from AD, PRD , HED, and EFED met with ADAMA, the technical registrant for

both prometon and folpet , to discuss the status of the Registration Review Data Call

- In
for each active ingredient

.

• Meeting participants also discussed the Tier II EDSP requirement for to test folpet in the

me daka

.

• The registration review docket for prometon ( EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2013

- 0068 ) opened in March

of 2013

, and the p reliminary risk a ssessments are expected to publish in the summer of

2017.

• The registration review docket for folpet (EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2012

- 0859) opened i n December

of 2012

, and the preliminary ris k assessments are currently scheduled to publish in

2018

.

Meeting Participants:

• See attached file.ADAMA | 3120 Highwoods Blvd. Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27604

Telephone +1 919 256 9300 | Facsimile +1 919 256 9308 | www.adama.com PROMETON AND FOLPET

ADAMA

- EPA MEETING

AGENDA

Location: Arlington, VA

Date : February 29 , 201 6

Time : 1

- 2:30 PM EST

ATTENDEES : ADAMA Representatives: Todd Denofreo

– Federal Regulatory Manager , Tali Ehrlich

– He a d of Global Regulatory Affairs , Vardit Danziger

– Global Senior Regulatory Project Manager , Patricia Sheehy

– Regulatory Leader

, Karina Castro

– Federal Regulatory Manager , Lauren Seabrook

– Federal Regulator y Manager

, Elliot Gordon

– ADAMA

Consultant and Ephi Gur

– ADAMA Consultant.

EPA Representatives: Members of the Pesticide Registration Division , Health Effects Division (HED)

, Environmental Fate and Effects Division ( EFED ) and Antimicrobial Division (AD)

SCHEDULE :

1:00

- 1:10 pm Roundtable Introduction

1:10

- 1:40 pm Prometon Data Call In ( ID No. GDCI

- 080 804

- 1345)

S tatus update

Discuss ion of pending studies:

835.43 00: Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism 835.4400: Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism Progress of studies

870.3465: 90

- day Inhalation Toxicity (TGAI, 24 months)

Discussion of waiver (dated 02/22/2016)

1:40

- 1: 45 pm Folpet Data Ca ll In (ID No. GDCI

- 081601

- 1326 ) DCI Update and Label approval process

1:45

- 2:00 pm EDSP Weight of Evidence ( Medaka Study)

2:00

- 2:30 pm Status of AEATF and discussion

MEETING ADJOURNED
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Charles Walker, Appellant, v Frederick Richardson, as Superintendent of Cayuga Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that he was denied the statutory right to a final parole revocation hearing within 90 *1062days of the probable cause determination made on August 23, 1989 *(see,*Executive Law § 259-i [3] [f] [i]). Excluding the periods of delay chargeable to petitioner by reason of his requests for adjournments, the final hearing was conducted well within the 90-day period and was, therefore, timely *(see, People ex rel. Smith v Meloni,*142 AD2d 959; *People ex rel. Sparrow v Johnson,*120 AD2d 694; *Matter of Moulier v Smith,*115 AD2d 307, *lv denied*67 NY2d 603). Supreme Court also correctly determined that the remaining issues raised by petitioner were without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J.—Habeas Corpus.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

**Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Nexen Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Reinhart, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
| 1.     |   | The   Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                       |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     |   | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the   Corporation. |

 

 
| By:    | /s/   Kevin J. Reinhart                                |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Kevin   J. Reinhart                                    |   |
|   | Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

 

February 24, 2011

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,765
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      691
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,368
<PP&E>                                          14,099
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,167
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,512
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,932
<PREFERRED>                                      6,663
<COMMON>                                        22,374
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,818
<SALES>                                         21,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,280
<CGS>                                           10,321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,707)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        29
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,736)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,736)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.57)


</TABLE>
# C_2016203EN.01000601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/6

---

Article 2

In order to perform its task, the Community shall, as provided in this Treaty:

| (a) | promote research and ensure the dissemination of technical information; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

promote research and ensure the dissemination of technical information;

| (b) | establish uniform safety standards to protect the health of workers and of the general public and ensure that they are applied; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

establish uniform safety standards to protect the health of workers and of the general public and ensure that they are applied;

| (c) | facilitate investment and ensure, particularly by encouraging ventures on the part of undertakings, the establishment of the basic installations necessary for the development of nuclear energy in the Community; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

facilitate investment and ensure, particularly by encouraging ventures on the part of undertakings, the establishment of the basic installations necessary for the development of nuclear energy in the Community;

| (d) | ensure that all users in the Community receive a regular and equitable supply of ores and nuclear fuels; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

ensure that all users in the Community receive a regular and equitable supply of ores and nuclear fuels;

| (e) | make certain, by appropriate supervision, that nuclear materials are not diverted to purposes other than those for which they are intended; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

make certain, by appropriate supervision, that nuclear materials are not diverted to purposes other than those for which they are intended;

| (f) | exercise the right of ownership conferred upon it with respect to special fissile materials; |
| --- | --- |

(f)

exercise the right of ownership conferred upon it with respect to special fissile materials;

| (g) | ensure wide commercial outlets and access to the best technical facilities by the creation of a common market in specialised materials and equipment, by the free movement of capital for investment in the field of nuclear energy and by freedom of employment for specialists within the Community; |
| --- | --- |

(g)

ensure wide commercial outlets and access to the best technical facilities by the creation of a common market in specialised materials and equipment, by the free movement of capital for investment in the field of nuclear energy and by freedom of employment for specialists within the Community;

| (h) | establish with other countries and international organisations such relations as will foster progress in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. |
| --- | --- |

(h)

establish with other countries and international organisations such relations as will foster progress in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.

---