alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01005501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/55

---

Article 17

1.   The Union respects and does not prejudice the status under national law of churches and religious associations or communities in the Member States.

2.   The Union equally respects the status under national law of philosophical and non-confessional organisations.

3.   Recognising their identity and their specific contribution, the Union shall maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with these churches and organisations.

---
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 129.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

(JUSTIN PETRILLA, No. 67566
Appellant,

vs. hom EY
MARISSA ROSE CASTILLO, F i L. 3
(Respondent. APR 29 2315

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This pro se appeal was docketed in this court on March 13,
2015, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day, this
lcourt-issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee
within ten days. The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing
fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date,
appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court’s
notice. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT
TRACIE K. LINDEMAN

By: Sduu Unda —

cc: Hon. Sandra L. Pomrenze, District Judge, Family Court Division
Justin Petrilla
Willick Law Group
Eighth District Court Clerk

‘SuprEME CouRT
OF
NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

_ SNeS4

o
#### Audrey Elaine GILMORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-75-691.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Feb. 12, 1976.

Raymond Criswell, Wewoka, for appellant.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., Robert L. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kenneth Lisle, Legal Intern, for appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge.

Appellant, Audrey Elaine Gilmore, was convicted of the crime of Forgery in the Second Degree in the District Court, Seminole County, Case No. CR-75-33. According to the verdict of the jury, a sentence of three (3) years’ imprisonment was imposed.

She has perfected her appeal to this Court raising several assignments of error. A review of the testimony and of the record fails to sustain these assignments of error.

Where a careful reading of the record, and a study of the briefs, reveal no error that would justify modification or reversal, this Court may affirm said judgment and sentence by summary order, or brief statement or by opinion, as the Court may see fit, as is prescribed by statute.

See, 20 O.S.1971, § 49, and *Ford v. State,*Okl.Cr.,447 P.2d 454 (1968).

Therefore, the judgment and sentence of the trial court is hereby, *affirmed.*

However, considering all the facts and circumstances concerned in this case, defense counsel is admonished to consider the provisions of 22 O.S.1971, § 994, for consideration by the trial court.

BRETT, P. J., and BLISS, J., concur.
Exhibit 15


Goody's Family Clothing, Inc.
Knoxville, Tennessee

We have made a review, in accordance with standards  established by the American
Institute of Certified Public  Accountants,  of the unaudited  interim financial
information of Goody's Family  Clothing,  Inc. for the periods ended May 1, 1999
and May 2, 1998,  as indicated in our report dated May 18, 1999;  because we did
not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware  that our  report  referred  to above,  which is  included  in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 1999, is incorporated
by reference in Registration  Statements  Nos.  333-32357,  33-51210,  33-68520,
333-00052 and 333-09595 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report,  pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the  Securities  Act of  1933,  is not  considered  a part  of the  Registration
Statement  prepared  or  certified  by an  accountant  or a report  prepared  or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
May 25, 1999




<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Holli C. Nichols, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ HOLLI C. NICHOLS                                                 
|                     |  |     |  | Holli C. Nichols Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Sherry Radack

Chief Justice

Terry Jennings

Evelyn Keyes

Laura Carter Higley

Jane Bland

Michael Massengale

Harvey Brown

Rebeca Huddle

Russell Lloyd

Justices

Court of Appeals

First District

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

April 7,2015

Christopher A. Prine

Clerk ofthe Court

Janet Williams

Chief Staff Attorney

Phone: 713-274-2700

Fax: 713-755-8131

www. 1stcoa.courts.state.tx.us

Michael Shayne Hansley

TDCJ #01815497

William P. Clements Unit

9601 Spur 591

Amarillo,TX 79107

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-12-01023-CR

Court of Appeals Number: 01-12-01024-CR

Court of Appeals Number: 01-12-01025-CR

Style: Michael ShayneHansley v. The Stateof Texas

Trial Court Case Number: 11CR1177

Trial Court Case Number: 11CR1178

Trial Court Case Number: 11CR1179

This is to acknowledge your communication received March 31,2015, with reference to your direct

appeal. Please be advised:

Enclosed are copies of the Mandates in your appeals.

Please sign below and return to show receipt.

FILED W ' 1ST COURT OF APPEALS

APR fc 0 2015

CLERK.

Received b

Sincerely,

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk ofthe Court

By Jesse Rodriguez, Deputy Clerk IV

RETURN RECEIPT

Date Received y-//ws~
CJdrk of ike Ccxtch HrJd-IS

rl<£a5ci Oe Qioiuiscd ^Aar tL'S

/TiQAcA/e j5 Hull ct^d UocJ.

Haol my TrQn^cr.piis OCen properL

•qcA(// rcVur^e.d . /he

hbue TOQno/ r/iar 2Z

f\&Ver reCtczvec/ OiTql Pro r\ou^cc^e/JG-f Sen-fe^ce hy -ike Tna/ J^9^

The firs'! Dis-Z^c-/ (Lou A or

TO Ctttyir/rs fn^i Cj>/)i/f<L-kos\. X

Qrr\ Cl-^rr~ (Bs\-f(^ Ce.V\o i/lecal/^

fCS^ raided OT (h V /-'6eAy ^jt'-rhoci/

Q. i£aA COr\wCc-ica^\ or &e*J-ei* c^o„

X Qjn (^rri'.iled To Q. fie to obzf&d

CtppQas\ Once. ^T na^e been properL
%0\ S?Ur 5V

RR HOUSTON, TEXAS

r

/

it /8/SV9?

SSOUSON,TEXAS

APR 2 0 2015

CHB1STOPHER A. PRINE

|CLERK_ —•

?~005.:33-ie:e

•Y'1ar:li.i;o tx asa '-\V.':;'

.-*"•

1;.:". #.•'. •:< ZfttSPM 2 L. ,.,.-""--.,>-^

Cotxrf O-P /Appeals

SO] FaAfliV\ S/r.fc!'/"

Houston, 7k'

il|ri.,jj.|l,ll.ijJ.,,J.ljiijji,.Ijllj|J,j.nj||lni.,j.l.ilj,|i.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 32

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
To view the full contents of this document, you need a later version of the PDF viewer. You can upgrade

to the latest version of Adobe Reader from www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html

For further support, go to www.adobe.com/support/products/acrreader.html
NACEPT – 20 YEAR ANNIVERSARY

RETROSPECTIVE: LESSONS LEARNED
VALUE OF NACEPT

CROSS-CUTTING, BROAD VIEW OF THE ISSUES

ADVICE LETTERS REFLECT BALANCE AMONG ALL 

MEMBERS’ INTERESTS

ADVICE REPRESENTS AN OBJECTIVE VIEWPOINT 

RATHER THAN A VESTED INTEREST OR 

PERSONAL AGENDA
WHAT ABOUT “CHARGES?”

• Effective Charges are very clearly written but not 

so narrow as to constrain good ideas.

• NACEPT consultation with the right EPA program 

staff is critical to understanding and 

implementing the charge.

• Taking time upfront thinking through the charge 

will save confusion later. Request 

amendment/clarification if necessary.

• Outlining the report based on charge may help 

identify fuzzy areas.
FEEDBACK FROM EPA: What about our 

Advice? 

EPA FEEDBACK:

• If long-term project, provide interim 

findings/preliminary observations

• Be practical- think about what can be 

implemented within the timeframe provided

• Be succinct, supporting recommendations 

with documentation where possible
More Advice on Good Advice

• Recommendations needs to be actionable

• If topic has been reviewed before (e.g., Report 

on the Environment), build on previous work 

of the Council

• Consider consulting with EPA regional offices 

(arrange with EPA point of contact)
Advice on Workgroup Operations

• Communication within the workgroup is key. Successful 

workgroups had with face-to-face meetings every 4 to 5 

months and conference calls every other week. 

– “trying to do everything through conference calls lowers the 

quality of the final product. It is much easier to reach a 

consensus in face to face meetings.”

• Too much lag time results in inefficiency.

• Contractor support is almost essential on large topics. 

However, a contractor who can do the fundamentals but is 

not well-versed in the topic can be counter-productive. 
Example of Successful Project

The “Everybody’s Business” report was effective 

because of its structure:

The report was organized around a few key

findings and recommendations, which provided 

structure for the specific action steps that were 

included under each recommendation. 

The number of action steps kept to “less than 

everything,” and were careful to identify what 

office and person in the Agency should respond 

to each action step. 
Depends on topic, but here are a few:

• Environmental Finance Advisory Board (FACA)

• Science Advisory Board (FACA)

• Innovation Action Council – internal with two 

state representatives

• Science Policy Council (Office of the Science 

Advisor) – internal with regional and HQ staff

More Coordination with Other 

Advisory Groups was Recommended
Performance Measures...

• Over the next ten years, how would you 

define success for NACEPT?

• Is the ultimate measure of NACEPT’s success 

the number of recommendations accepted 

and implemented by EPA?

• Other measures of success? 

THE SUCCESS OF NACEPT IS IN YOUR HANDS!
# C_2016203EN.01004401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/44

---

Article 176

1.   Subject to the limits resulting from programmes or decisions involving expenditure which, in pursuance of this Treaty, require the unanimous approval of the Council, allocations for research and investment expenditure shall include:

| (a) | commitment appropriations, covering a series of items which constitute a separate unit and form a coherent whole; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

commitment appropriations, covering a series of items which constitute a separate unit and form a coherent whole;

| (b) | payment appropriations which represent the maximum amount payable each year in respect of the commitments entered into under subparagraph (a). |
| --- | --- |

(b)

payment appropriations which represent the maximum amount payable each year in respect of the commitments entered into under subparagraph (a).

2.   The schedule of due dates for commitments and payments shall be annexed to the corresponding draft budget proposed by the Commission.

3.   Appropriations for research and investment shall be classified under different chapters grouping items of expenditure according to their nature or purpose and subdivided, as far as may be necessary, in accordance with the regulations made pursuant to Article 322 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

4.   Unused payment authorisations shall be carried forward to the next financial year by decision of the Commission, unless the Council decides otherwise.

---
# C_2016202EN.01005301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/53

---

Article 8

(ex Article 3(2) TEC)
   (1)

(ex Article 3(2) TEC)

1

In all its activities, the Union shall aim to eliminate inequalities, and to promote equality, between men and women.

---

(1)  These references are merely indicative. For more ample information, please refer to the tables of equivalences between the old and the new numbering of the Treaties.

1

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00399-CV

Law Office of Larry Laden, P.C., Larry Laden, Individually, 

and Clay Boulware, Individually, Appellants

v.

Alysa Baker, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY,

NO. C-1-CV-13-010495, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, explaining that they have

resolved their dispute. We grant the motion and dismissthe appeal with prejudice. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: April 16, 2015
&6r*^ UeitT74*5 tti^y 7SJ*J6

H-«*Ato//r, 7* -77S&

APRl-5^

r*. ;<;•>.-.
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

**Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act Of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Nexen Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Reinhart, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
| 1.     | The   Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| 2.     | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
| By:    | /s/   Kevin J. Reinhart                                |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Kevin   J. Reinhart                                    |
|   | Interim   President & Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

February 23, 2012

 

1

----
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 2

LEGAL ACTS OF THE UNION, ADOPTION PROCEDURES AND OTHER PROVISIONS

SECTION 1

SECTION 1

THE LEGAL ACTS OF THE UNION

Article 290

1.   A legislative act may delegate to the Commission the power to adopt non-legislative acts of general application to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of the legislative act.

The objectives, content, scope and duration of the delegation of power shall be explicitly defined in the legislative acts. The essential elements of an area shall be reserved for the legislative act and accordingly shall not be the subject of a delegation of power.

2.   Legislative acts shall explicitly lay down the conditions to which the delegation is subject; these conditions may be as follows:

| (a) | the European Parliament or the Council may decide to revoke the delegation; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the European Parliament or the Council may decide to revoke the delegation;

| (b) | the delegated act may enter into force only if no objection has been expressed by the European Parliament or the Council within a period set by the legislative act. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the delegated act may enter into force only if no objection has been expressed by the European Parliament or the Council within a period set by the legislative act.

For the purposes of (a) and (b), the European Parliament shall act by a majority of its component members, and the Council by a qualified majority.

3.   The adjective ‘delegated’ shall be inserted in the title of delegated acts.

---
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

C.   DECLARATIONS BY MEMBER STATES

DECLARATIONS BY MEMBER STATES

63.   Declaration by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on the definition of the term "nationals"

Declaration by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on the definition of the term "nationals"

In respect of the Treaties and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in any of the acts deriving from those Treaties or continued in force by those Treaties, the United Kingdom reiterates the Declaration it made on 31 December 1982 on the definition of the term ‘nationals’ with the exception that the reference to ‘British Dependent Territories Citizens’ shall be read as meaning ‘British overseas territories citizens’.

---
Order 2013

- 2

- 18

Served: February 20, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 20 th day of December, 2012

In the matter of the cancellation of the foreign certificate

i ssued to

ASTAR USA, LLC

Pursuant to the provisions of 14 CFR § 204.7 Docket DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 0223

ORDER CANCE L L ING FOREIGN CERTIFICATE

By O rder 2012

- 12

- 14 , issued on December 20, 2012 , we cancelled the section 41102 certificate

of public convenience and neces sity authorizing ASTAR USA, LLC, to engage in interstate

scheduled air transportation of property and mail.

By this order, we are cance l ling the company’s companion foreign scheduled all

- cargo certificate

authority. Instead of repeating our findings and conclusion s in Order 2012

- 12

- 14 , we

incorporate them here by reference.

ACCORDINGLY , Pursuant to authority assigned by the Department in its regulations,

14 CFR 385.12:

1. We cancel the foreign certificate issued to ASTAR USA, LLC

, by Order 201 1

- 7

- 1 4

aut horizing it to engage in foreign scheduled air transportation of property and mail.

2. Unless disapproved by the President of the United States under section 41307 of Title 49 of

the United States Code, this order shall become effective on the 61 st day after its submission for

section 41307 review or upon the date of receipt of advice from the President or his designee

under Executive Order 12597 and implementing regulations that he or she does not intend to

disapprove the Department’s order under that section, whichever occurs earlier. 1

1 This order was submitted for section 41307 review on December 20, 2012. The 61 st day is February 19, 2013.

Since the President or his designee did not disapprove this order before that date, it became effective on February

19, 2013.

.

U N

I T E D S

T A T E S O F A

M E R I C A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T

I O

N2

3. We will serve a copy of this order on the persons listed in Attachment A.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for r eview of this order under the Department’s

Regulations, 14 CFR 385.30, may file their petitions within 10 days of this service date of this

order.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is availab le on the World Wide Web at:

http: / /

www.regulations.govAttachment A

SERVICE LIST FOR A STAR USA, LLC

ELLIOTT SEIDEN

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

5301 WISCONSIN AVENUE NW

WASHINGTON DC 20015 OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

GLENN GOSNEL

PRINCIPAL OPERATIONS INSPECTOR

FAA CINCINATTI FSDO

- 05

4358 FERGUSON DRIVE

CINCINATTI OH 45245 MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION & EVALUATION

PROGRAM OFFICE

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE

, SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

JEFF KLANG

REGIONAL COUNSEL

O’HARE LAKE OFFICE CENTER

2300 EAST DEVON AVENUE

DES PLAINES IL 60018 PETER LYNCH AGC

- 300

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR

ENFORCEMENT

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591
# C_2016203EN.01001901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/19

---

Article 31

The basic standards shall be worked out by the Commission after it has obtained the opinion of a group of persons appointed by the Scientific and Technical Committee from among scientific experts, and in particular public health experts, in the Member States. The Commission shall obtain the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on these basic standards.

After consulting the European Parliament the Council shall, on a proposal from the Commission, which shall forward to it the opinions obtained from these Committees, establish the basic standards; the Council shall act by a qualified majority.

---