alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF HEALTH  PROFESSIONALS,  INC., FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

        
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          32       
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,215
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,935
<INVENTORY>                                     87
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,634
<PP&E>                                       3,008
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,716
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       109
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,442
<SALES>                                      6,251 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,260
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,378)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,378)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.25)

        

</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00112

- CV
Gloria Rodriguez v. Jose Manuel Rodriguez, Sr.
On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Calhoun County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 12

- 6

- 1632

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause
remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court SET ASIDE and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion

. Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 24, 2014.
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeExplore the Capitol CampusThe Art Collection
Justice and History Sculpture

Justice and History features two draped female figures reclining against a globe.
        
                  The Basics
      
Artist
      
Thomas Crawford

Materials
    Marble

Year
    1863

Dimensions
    11 feet 12 inches

Location
      
Senate Wing, East Front

U.S. Capitol Building

Justice holds a book inscribed "Justice / Law / Order" in her left hand; her right hand rests on a pair of scales. History holds a scroll inscribed "History / July / 1776." Overall length of the sculpture is 11 feet 2 inches.

The sculpture arrived at the Capitol in early 1860 and was kept in the former Hall of the House of Representatives until the exterior of the U.S.Capitol's Senate extension was ready to receive it.

Placed above the Senate doors in 1863, the sculpture deteriorated over the following century. In 1974 the original was removed, restored with plaster to its appearance as documented in early photographs and then used as a model for the carving of a new marble replica, which was installed at the U.S. Capitol later that year. The restored original figures may be seen at the Law Library door near the Capitol Crypt.
          
    
      Image Gallery
    
    Previous Image
        Next Image Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
#### Arlene Monteleone, as Administratrix of the Estate of Stephen Monteleone, Deceased, Appellant, v Thomas Hickey et al., Respondents.

—Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Williams, J.), entered June 18, 1990 in Sullivan County, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute.

Since a proper substitution of parties in this case was not made prior to the entry of the order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, the order was a nullity and this court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal *(see, Bossert v Ford Motor Co.,*140 AD2d 480; *Silvagnoli v Consolidated Edison Employees Mut. Aid Socy.,*112 AD2d 819). The death of a party terminates his attorney’s authority to act and stays the action pending the substitution of a legal representative *(Weber v Bellinger,*124 AD2d 1009). Therefore, given that the order in this case was made between the death of decedent and plaintiff’s substitution as legal representative, it was void *(see, Byrd v Johnson,*67 AD2d 992).

Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich Jr. and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.
# C_2016202EN.01030601.xml

| | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/306 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/306

---

PROTOCOL (No 25)

ON THE EXERCISE OF SHARED COMPETENCE

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Sole Article

With reference to Article 2(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on shared competence, when the Union has taken action in a certain area, the scope of this exercise of competence only covers those elements governed by the Union act in question and therefore does not cover the whole area.

---
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



The undersigned officers of AutoImmune Inc. (the Company) hereby certify that, as of the date of this statement, the Companys quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act) and that, to the best of their
knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of September 30, 2004 and the results of operations of the Company for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2004.



The purpose of this certification is solely to
comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This statement is not filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Act or any other federal or state law or regulation.



|                        |  |        |  |                                  
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2004 |  |        |  | /s/ Robert C. Bishop             
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Robert C. Bishop                 
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer          
|                        |  |       
|                        |  |        |  | /s/ Heather A. Ellerkamp         
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Heather A. Ellerkamp             
|                        |  | Title: |  | Director of Finance and Treasurer



16
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,319,626
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,907,990
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (441,428)
<INVENTORY>                                        423,972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,028,314
<PP&E>                                           5,473,282
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (810,804)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,739,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,651,092
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         3,826,926
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,662,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,739,534
<SALES>                                         16,980,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,980,682
<CGS>                                           13,811,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,417,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 146,710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    557,109
<INCOME-TAX>                                       258,191
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                298,918
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       298,918
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.10
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Sinais, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Clifford Scott, J.), rendered on January 17, 1990, convicting defendant upon a plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound *426by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *Iv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MIRCHO MURDJEFF and

EL DIABLO ENTERPRIZE CORPORATION,

Appellants,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS 

TRUSTEE (CWALT 2007-HY4),

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2759 

[August 9, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE10014628.

Theresa B. Edwards and David F. Edwards of American Justice, P.A., 

Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Ileen J. Cantor and Ronald M. Gaché of Shapiro, Fishman & Gaché, 

LLP, Boca Raton, for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report incorporated by reference in the Form 10-K into the Company's previously
filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-35386, 33-78524, 33-78922,
and 33-61267), Form S-3 (Nos. 33-69961, 33-69397, 33-31113, 33-03091 and 
33-85348), Form S-2 (No. 33-80770) and S-4 (No. 33-53627).

                                            /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Chattanooga, Tennessee
February 26, 1999
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00054-CR

RANDY WAYNE TUCKER APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 235TH DISTRICT COURT OF COOKE COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 13-00410

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

On February 5, 2015, Randy Wayne Tucker mailed a notice of appeal from 

his October 22, 2014 conviction to the Cooke County District Clerk, who filed it 

on February 12, 2015. Although we have notified appellant of our concern that 

we lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the notice of appeal was not timely 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

filed, we have not received a response from appellant or his appointed counsel.

2

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b), 26.2(a)(1), 44.3. Accordingly, we dismiss this 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Slaton v. State, 981 

S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 16, 2015

 2

The Cooke County District Clerk has forwarded this court a copy of an 

11.07 application for writ of habeas corpus seeking an out of time appeal that 

was filed by appointed counsel. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 

(West Supp. 2014). That application is pending in the trial court.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Stormy L. Dean, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of infoUSA Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. [Intentionally omitted]; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: February 21, 2006    /s/*Stormy L. Dean*   Stormy L. Dean   Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus II Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report), I, Anthony R. Moore, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ ANTHONY R. MOORE                             
|                       |  | Anthony R. Moore Chairman Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 82439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 24, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 17, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 21 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-63, CP2024-64.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-25899 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 31.1IEA Income Fund XII, L.P.Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income Fund XII, L.P. (the“Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 10, 2007   /s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ Dennis J. Tietz