alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01007201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/72

---

Article 64

(ex Article 57 TEC)

(ex Article 57 TEC)

1.   The provisions of Article 63 shall be without prejudice to the application to third countries of any restrictions which exist on 31 December 1993 under national or Union law adopted in respect of the movement of capital to or from third countries involving direct investment – including in real estate – establishment, the provision of financial services or the admission of securities to capital markets. In respect of restrictions existing under national law in Bulgaria, Estonia and Hungary, the relevant date shall be 31 December 1999. In respect of restrictions existing under national law in Croatia, the relevant date shall be 31 December 2002.

2.   Whilst endeavouring to achieve the objective of free movement of capital between Member States and third countries to the greatest extent possible and without prejudice to the other Chapters of the Treaties, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall adopt the measures on the movement of capital to or from third countries involving direct investment – including investment in real estate – establishment, the provision of financial services or the admission of securities to capital markets.

3.   Notwithstanding paragraph 2, only the Council, acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure, may unanimously, and after consulting the European Parliament, adopt measures which constitute a step backwards in Union law as regards the liberalisation of the movement of capital to or from third countries.

---
CERTIFICATION 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE) 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Firstgold Corp. (the “Company”), for the period ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to our knowledge 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                   | FIRSTGOLD CORP.                         |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |                                    |   |
| Dated: October 6, 2009 |                                    |   |
|                   | /s/ Terrence Lynch                      |   |
|                   | Terrence Lynch, Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                   |                                    |   |
|                   |                                    |   |
| Dated: October 6, 2009 |                                    |   |
|                   | /s/ James Kluber                        |   |
|                   | James Kluber, Chief Financial Officer   |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,402
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  405,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                    55,589
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               436,090
<PP&E>                                       2,355,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                 590,257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,762,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          505,514
<BONDS>                                        697,065
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,110
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,239,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,762,465
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               531,848
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  408,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,290
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,997
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,701
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,673
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,028
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,028
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE II

FREEDOMS

FREEDOMS

Article 16

Freedom to conduct a business

The freedom to conduct a business in accordance with Union law and national laws and practices is recognised.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VIII

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

CHAPTER 2

MONETARY POLICY

Article 129

(ex Article 107 TEC)

(ex Article 107 TEC)

1.   The ESCB shall be governed by the decision-making bodies of the European Central Bank which shall be the Governing Council and the Executive Board.

2.   The Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB’) is laid down in a Protocol annexed to the Treaties.

3.   Articles 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 17, 18, 19.1, 22, 23, 24, 26, 32.2, 32.3, 32.4, 32.6, 33.1(a) and 36 of the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB may be amended by the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure. They shall act either on a recommendation from the European Central Bank and after consulting the Commission or on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Central Bank.

4.   The Council, either on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and the European Central Bank or on a recommendation from the European Central Bank and after consulting the European Parliament and the Commission, shall adopt the provisions referred to in Articles 4, 5.4, 19.2, 20, 28.1, 29.2, 30.4 and 34.3 of the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB.

---
Committee Purpose

To advise the Access Board on 

matters related to the revision and 

update of the guidelines addressing 

transportation vehicles using fixed 

guideway systems subject to the 

Americans with Disabilities Act 

(ADA)
Why the Advisory Committee 

• Combines the best elements of consensus 

rulemaking and the Federal rulemaking 

process

• Allows the Board access to expertise not 

always readily available

• Develops support for the rule
Access Board’s Jurisdiction

We can address:

• Physical elements of vehicles using fixed 

guideway systems (e.g., rapid rail, light rail, 

commuter rail, and intercity rail)

• New and remanufactured transportation 

vehicles, to the extent required by regulations 

issued by DOT
Access Board’s Jurisdiction

We can address:

• Technical requirements (e.g. size, location, 

configuration, and referenced standards)

• Scoping (e.g. number and triggering events) 

except where prescribed in the ADA or 

addressed by enforcing agency 
Access Board’s Jurisdiction

We cannot address:

• Policies, practices, or procedures or 

modifications to them

• Furniture and equipment that is not part of 

the vehicle

• Auxiliary aids and services 

• Whether to permit certain types of service 

animals 
Out of Committee Scope

• Buses and vans (rubber tires)

• Buildings and facilities 
What We Would Like to See in a 

Final Report

Recommendations for revisions to current 

requirements

• Change;

• Remove; or 

• Retain
What We Would Like to See in a 

Final Report

Recommendations addressing gaps in the 

current requirements, e.g. features promoting: 

• Mobility access

• Communications access

• Other (currently unidentified) features 

addressing the needs of people with other 

types of disabilities
What We Would Like to See in a 

Final Report

Rationale for each recommendation

• Why is the change needed

• Supporting data or other relevant information

• A description of who benefits

• Where possible, cost considerations 
Final Committee Report

• Minimum appropriate standard to ensure nondiscrimination on the basis of disability

• Build on existing ADA Standards 

– Departures from current Board rules should be 

based on new information or the unique 

characteristics of the vehicle
Final Report Format

• Plain English

• Regulatory format is not necessary 

• Supplemental material such as illustrations 

and advisory only if time permits
Thank You! 

We appreciate your time, energy, and 

commitment to accessibility
ftJlLk

^M»^\&>a3& , x^v^vwv^x -A te\ ^RSS^fc

* \nV^\\-^V

;©ur

SX^JSsaaa^

iTM-

^^^^^^^•^^JSs^^^^J^^^^^%-

KSS

1_is^.

^S^v^
# C_2016203EN.01004101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/41

---

Article 135

The Commission may undertake any consultations and establish any study groups necessary to the performance of its tasks.

---
Matthew Rodriquez 

Secretary for 

Environmental Protection 

July 18, 2014 

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

Regional Administrator 

Air Resources Board 

Mary D. Nichols, Chairman 

1001 I Street • P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, California 95812 • www.arb.ca.gov 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: 

Edmund G. Brown Jr. 

Governor 

On July 7, 2009, the Air Resources Board (ARB) submitted a certification letter to the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) addressing Clean Air Act (CAA) 

infrastructure requirements for the 2006 PM2.5 national ambient air quality standards 

(NAAQS) including those for interstate transport as required by U.S. EPA guidance at 

that time. 

You staff has informed us that as a result of recent litigation, additional analysis is now 

needed to address the interstate transport element of the Infrastructure SIP. As 

requested, we are withdrawing our July 7, 2009 letter and will work with your staff to 

develop the additional information needed. ARB will prepare a revised PM2.5 transport 

element addressing both the 2006 and 2012 PM2.5 standards, and submit a SIP 

revision to address any outstanding requirements. 

If your staff has any questions, please have them contact Ms. Sylvia Vanderspek, 

Chief, Air Quality Planning Branch, at (916) 324-7163, or via email at 

svanders@arb.ca.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Executive 

Ri~to~f ~ U 

cc: See next page. 

The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. 

For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website: http://www.arb.ca.gov. 

California Environmental Protection Agency 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

July 18, 2014 

Page 2 

cc: Matt Lakin, Chief 

Air Planning Office 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 941 05 

Ms. Sylvia Vanderspek, Chief 

Air Quality Planning Branch 

Air Quality Planning and Science Division 
Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

July 18, 2014 

Page 3 

bee: Lynn Terry, EO 

Kurt Karperos, AQPS 

Karen Magliano, AQPS 

Webster Tasat, AQPS 

Kasia Turkiewiez, AQPS 

AQPS #9206 I ARB #18642 

X:\PM25-2012 SIPs for 2006 standard\Submittals to U.S. 

EPA\Withdrawal Letter 7.11.2014.doe - -
Plant Variety Protection - 30 Certificates Issued on September 15, 2023

APPLICATION 

NUMBER

VARIETY NAME CROP APPLICANT / OWNER *CERTIFIED

SEED ONLY?

202000295 Grace BEAN, ADZUKI Pro-Set Seed Company No

202000394 5PKTW89 SOYBEAN Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000407 5PKDW89 SOYBEAN Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000408 5PEDN51 SOYBEAN Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000409 5PFMW92 SOYBEAN Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000410 5PCPZ96 SOYBEAN Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000426 Sweet Flame ARUGULA Elsoms Seeds Ltd. No

202100045 Jewel RICE The Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas No

202100050 5PAZG19 SOYBEAN Agrigenetics, Inc. No

202100051 5PDEN28 SOYBEAN Agrigenetics, Inc. No

202100052 5PBFR19 SOYBEAN Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100053 5PKUU81 SOYBEAN Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100064 UADA1701081 RICE The Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas Yes

202100065 SAKSOY007 SOYBEAN Sakata Seed Corporation No

202100234 Gator Fore RYEGRASS DLF Pickseed USA, Inc. and Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey No

202100236 Petunia POTATO Tuberosum Technologies, Inc. No

202100237 Snapdragon POTATO Tuberosum Technologies, Inc. No

202100240 DG263L RICE Nutrien Ag Solutions Yes

202100252 Peony POTATO Tuberosum Technologies, Inc. No

202100253 Canna POTATO Tuberosum Technologies, Inc. No

202100365 Baby Lou POTATO Saka Pflanzenzucht GmbH & Co. KG No

202100419 MAKAKO ALMOND Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) No

202100483 MATAN ALMOND The State of Israel, Ministry of Agriculture & Rural Development, Agricultural Research Organization No

202100487 MK5601 CAMELLIA National Agriculture and Food Research Organization No

202100496 Fresco PEA, GARDEN W. Brotherton Seed Co, Inc. No

202200057 PA6UNIBO CHERRY, SWEET Alma Mater Studiorum - Universita di Bologna No

202200075 TF 7142 CHERRY, SWEET Terry T. Fewel No

202200152 Georgia-Val/HO PEANUT University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. Yes

202200153 Georgia-20VHO PEANUT University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. Yes

202200154 Georgia-19HP PEANUT University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. Yes

* Certified seed - seed which has been determined by an official seed certifying agency to conform to standards of genetic purity and identity as to variety, which standards

have been approved by the Secretary.

USDA, AMS, Science and Technology, Plant Variety Protection Office (202) 260-8983 Page 1 of 1
1

MEMORANDUM

To : Commercial Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator Docket

From : Amy Hambrick , US EPA

Date: September 25, 2012

Subject: EPA Meeting with Commenters

EPA met with representatives from the Alaska Oil and Gas Association ( AOGA ) and some of their

members to discuss their public comments and reconsideration petition submitted to the CISWI proposed reconsideration public docket. AOGA’s comments can be found elsewhere in this docket. Telephone meetings were held on June 12, 2012, July 26, 2012, and August 29, 2012.
In denying appellant's motion, the district court concluded 

that appellant failed to set forth a prima facie case that there had been a 

substantial change in circumstances and that modifying the custody 

arrangement would serve the child's best interest. See Ellis v. Carucci, 

123 Nev. 145, 150-51, 161 P.3d 239, 242-43 (2007) (setting forth the 

standard for modifying primary physical custody); Rooney v. Rooney, 109 

Nev. 540, 542-43, 853 P.2d 123, 124-25 (1993) (explaining what is required 

to make a prima facie case for custody modification, and that absent such 

a showing, an evidentiary hearing is not required). The district court 

determined that appellant's assertions regarding the child's preference 

and academic performance had been previously considered in conjunction 

with prior• motions and that custody had not been modified. See 

McMonigle v. McMonigle, 110 Nev. 1407, 1408, 887 P.2d 742, 743 (1994) 

(providing that the moving party must demonstrate a substantial change 

of circumstances since the most recent custodial order). The district court 

acknowledged that a child's preference is one factor to be considered, but 

gave the child's preference marginal weight under the circumstances and 

history of this case. See NRS 125.480(4)(a) (providing that when 

determining the child's best interest the court shall consider the child's 

wishes "if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to form an intelligent 

preference as to his or her custody"). 

A child's preference is one of many factors for the court to 

consider in determining the child's best interest, see NRS 125.480(4), and 

matters of custody rest within the district court's sound discretion. See 

Wallace v. Wallace, 112 Nev. 1015, 1019, 922 P.2d 541, 543 (1996). 

Having considered the record on appeal and the parties' arguments, we 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A ve. 
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying 

appellant's motion without an evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

Gibbons 

cc: Hon. Alvin R. Kacin, District Judge 

Troy Thomas Terrillion 

Emily Jane Baarz 

Elko County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 3 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A ex.
EXHIBIT 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, George J. Korphage, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, based on my knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


                                    /s/ George J. Korphage
                                    ---------------------
                                    George J. Korphage
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    March 20, 2003
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE IX

EMPLOYMENT

EMPLOYMENT

Article 145

(ex Article 125 TEC)

(ex Article 125 TEC)

Member States and the Union shall, in accordance with this Title, work towards developing a coordinated strategy for employment and particularly for promoting a skilled, trained and adaptable workforce and labour markets responsive to economic change with a view to achieving the objectives defined in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE IV

FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL

FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL

CHAPTER 4

CAPITAL AND PAYMENTS

Article 65

(ex Article 58 TEC)

(ex Article 58 TEC)

1.   The provisions of Article 63 shall be without prejudice to the right of Member States:

| (a) | to apply the relevant provisions of their tax law which distinguish between taxpayers who are not in the same situation with regard to their place of residence or with regard to the place where their capital is invested; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to apply the relevant provisions of their tax law which distinguish between taxpayers who are not in the same situation with regard to their place of residence or with regard to the place where their capital is invested;

| (b) | to take all requisite measures to prevent infringements of national law and regulations, in particular in the field of taxation and the prudential supervision of financial institutions, or to lay down procedures for the declaration of capital movements for purposes of administrative or statistical information, or to take measures which are justified on grounds of public policy or public security. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to take all requisite measures to prevent infringements of national law and regulations, in particular in the field of taxation and the prudential supervision of financial institutions, or to lay down procedures for the declaration of capital movements for purposes of administrative or statistical information, or to take measures which are justified on grounds of public policy or public security.

2.   The provisions of this Chapter shall be without prejudice to the applicability of restrictions on the right of establishment which are compatible with the Treaties.

3.   The measures and procedures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on the free movement of capital and payments as defined in Article 63.

4.   In the absence of measures pursuant to Article 64(3), the Commission or, in the absence of a Commission decision within three months from the request of the Member State concerned, the Council, may adopt a decision stating that restrictive tax measures adopted by a Member State concerning one or more third countries are to be considered compatible with the Treaties in so far as they are justified by one of the objectives of the Union and compatible with the proper functioning of the internal market. The Council shall act unanimously on application by a Member State.

---