alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
No. 23(c)





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-148040 and 333-126967, each on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 28,
2008, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of
Florida Power Corporation d/b/a Progress Energy Florida, Inc. (PEF) (which
report on the financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
an explanatory paragraph concerning the adoption of new accounting principles in
2007 and 2006) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10−K of PEF for the year
ended December 31, 2007.





/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP





Raleigh,
North Carolina


February
28, 2008
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 24, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00633

- CR

Gabriel Antonio VALVERDE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4166W

Honorab le Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California

, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel has informed the appellant of his right to file his own brief and provided appellant with portions of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). The State has filed a letter waiving its right to file an appellee’s brief unless the appellant files a pro

se brief.

If the appellant desires to request the complete appellate record, he must request the record in writing within ten days from the date of this order. If the appellant desir es to file a pro se brief, he must do so within thirty days from the date of this order. See Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after the date the appellant ’s pro se brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending

further order of the court.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of January, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 23.3**

 
|                                                                                                                                         |   |       |   |                      | FAX (713) 651-0849 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------|--------|---------------------------|--------------------|
|                     1100  LOUISIANA |   | SUITE 3800 |   | HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5218 |               | TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191 |
|                                                                                                                                         |        |            |        |                           |                    |  |  |  |  |  |

 

 

February 21, 2008

 

Nexen Inc.

801 7th Avenue SW

Calgary, Alberta  T2P 3P7

 

Board of Directors:

 

We hereby consent to references to Ryder Scott Company L.P. relating tothe evaluation of certain oil and gas properties of Nexen Inc. (the “Company”)contained in the section entitled “Basis of Reserves Estimates” within “Reserves,Production and Related Information” as set out in Part I, Items 1&2Business and Properties of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 
|   | Very Truly Yours,             |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                          |
|   |                          |
|   | /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P. |   |
|   |                          |
|   |                          |
|   | **RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P**. |

 

Houston Texas

February 21, 2008

 
| 1200, 530 8TH AVENUE, S.W.  |   | CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 3S8    |   | TEL (403) 262-2799 |   | FAX (403) 262-2790 |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------|--------|--------------------|
| 621 17TH STREET, SUITE 1550 |   | DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501 |   | TEL (303) 623-9147 |   | FAX (303) 623-4258 |

 

----
INSPIREMD,
Inc.


4
Menorat Hamor Street


Tel
Aviv, Israel 67448


 


June
28, 2018


 


Sabby
Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd.


10
Mountainview Road


Suite
205


Upper
Saddle River, NJ 07458


 


Re:
Redemption of Preferred Stock


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


Reference
is made to that certain (i) Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2017, between InspireMD, Inc. (the “Company”)
and Sabby Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd. (“Sabby”), as amended on February 21, 2018 (the “SPA”),
(ii) Waiver Agreement, dated February 26, 2018, between the Company and Sabby and (iii) Waiver Agreement, dated March 28, 2018,
between the Company and Sabby (collectively, the “Prior Agreements”).


 


Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary set forth in the Prior Agreements, the Company and Sabby hereby agree that in the event the Company consummates
a Qualified Offering (as defined in the SPA), pursuant to which Sabby and its affiliates invest at least $3 million, the Company
shall redeem all of the shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and Series D Convertible Preferred Stock held by Sabby
and its affiliates for an aggregate of $ $2,264,269.


 


Except
as set forth herein, all other provisions of the Prior Agreements shall remain unchanged by this letter agreement.


 


	 	Very
    truly yours,
	 	 
	 	INSPIREMD,
    INC. 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ James
    Barry
	 	Name:	James
    Barry, Ph.D.
	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer


 





	Acknowledged and Agreed	 
	as of June 28 ,
    2018	 
	 	 
	Sabby Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd.	 


 


	By:	  /s/
    Robert Grundstein 	 
	Name:	  Robert
    Grundstein 	 
	Title:	  COO
    of Investment Manager
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

I, Geoffrey G. Meyers, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Manor Care, Inc. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
          September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Geoffrey G. Meyers

Geoffrey G. Meyers
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
October 31, 2003

                                       32
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T Z HI Z HO NG Z HE NG ; Z HO NG QING P E N G ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73026 A ge nc yN os . A 097- 870- 370

A 097- 870- 368 A 097- 870- 369 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t11, 2011 ** B efo re: T H O M A S , S IL V E R M A N , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Z hi z hong Z he ng a nd Z hongqi ng P e ng, na t i ve s of C hi naa nd c i t i z e ns of N auru, a nd the i rdaught e r , na t i ve of T ha i l a nd a nd c i t i z e n of N auru, pe t i t i on f

or re vi ew of the deci si on of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order a f f i rm i ng a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng the i rappl i c a t i on f ora s y l um 

# FI LED AU G 16 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73026 2 a n dw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e re vi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence, L i v . A s h c r o ft , 37 8 F . 3d 95 9, 96 2 (9th C i r. 20 04 ), a n dd e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on base d o n the om i ss i on fr om pet i t i on er s’ as ylum appl i cat i on and asy l um offi ce r i nt e rvi e w of

the s i gni f

i c a nti ns t a nc e of

ha rm the yt e s t i f

i e d the ys uf

f e r e d i n N auru, s e e Alv a r ez - Sa n to zv . I

NS , 33 2 F . 3d 12 45 , 12 54 (9th C i r. 20 03 ) ( om i ss i on of a

“ d ram at i c, p i v o t al ” ev en tfro m asyl u m ap p l i cat i o n sup p o rt edag en cy’ s ad v erse c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n ) ; s e e a l s o Li , 37 8 F . 3d at96 2-63 , and the agency r e a s o n ab lyr e

je c te dp e titio n e r s ’ e x p lan a tio n s f o rth e o m is s io n , se e R i ve ra v. Mukasey , 508 F . 3d 1271, 1275 ( 9th C i r . 2007) . W e r e j e c tpe t i t i one r s ’ c ont e nt i on th a t th e a g e n c yim p r o p e r lyr e lie do n th e c r e d ib le f e a rin te rv ie w , p a rtic u lar ly b e c au s e th e a s y lu m o f

f ic e rte s tif

ie da t th e h e a r in g . Se e Li , 378 F . 3d a t963. I n the abs e nc e of

c r e di bl e t e s t i m ony , pe t i t i one r s ’ a s y l um a nd w i thhol di ng of r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. Se e Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 34 8 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 56 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
EXHIBIT 31.1IEA Income Fund XII, L.P.Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income Fund XII, L.P. (the“Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 12, 2005   /s/ DENNIS J TIETZ     Dennis J Tietz  President of CCC  (Chief Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06929**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 06929\06929_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 06929\06929_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06929\06929_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06929\06929_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 

### 06929\06929_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06929\06929_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06929\06929_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06929\06929_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06929\06929_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06929\06929_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06929\06929_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06929\06929_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06929\Supporting Documents\06929_A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06929\Supporting Documents\06929_A5-3 wb-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06929\Supporting Documents\06929_D3-1 pond-1 D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 06929\Supporting Documents\06929_Submittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
DlGr~OfCoo~oFCRtMlNALAffeALS CLmC 

L Ng\ft5R. FllltD A-W~frtl\t '/OUR G?AJ~~ ~S.OP lfffi ~VOU~ 

2J; Rl£1) RVJ~t'\A'~Sg-~rvte-~W~~~ ~lc \N~~Tffl!;fV/E!IWiAib 

OF\fttlS, Plffi~-e- fM.,Pm 8 u l\lf0lg ICSfANID "\T'b4A-N (< "-f()J 

• ~l - ·• < -~ -~· ., 

RECEIVED IN 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

APR 20 2015 

Abel Acos~a, Clark
**AMS Declaration of Carcass Evaluation**

**Evaluation Requirement for the EU HQB Quota:**

*The carcass from which beef cuts are derived shall be evaluated by an evaluator employed by the national government who bases the evaluation, and a resulting classification of the carcass, on a method approved by the national government.  The national government evaluation method, and its classifications, must evaluate expected carcass quality using a combination of carcass maturity and palatability traits of the beef cuts.  Such an evaluation method of the carcass shall include, but not be limited to, an evaluation of the maturity characteristics of color and texture of the longissimus dorsi muscle and bone and cartilage ossification, as well as an evaluation of expected palatability traits including a combination of the discrete specifications of intramuscular fat and firmness of the longissimus dorsi muscle.*

**Instructions:** Harvest Facility

Provide this document to the AMS, Livestock and Poultry Program, Quality Assessment Division (QAD) employee for verification of carcass evaluation under the European Union (EU) High Quality Beef (HQB) quota.  Provide the lot number, head count, and producer name or identification number (NHTC-approval number) for all lots submitted for evaluation.

**Instructions:**QAD employee conducting the carcass evaluation

Complete the date of the evaluation, the USDA Grader's name, and the USDA Grader's signature indicating that the carcasses have been evaluated in accordance with requirements of the EU HQB quota.

**USDA Verification Statement:**

*Carcasses from the lot(s) below have been evaluated by a USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, Livestock, and Poultry Program, Quality Assessment Division employee based on the Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.*

**Once completed and signed by the USDA Grader, a copy of the record must be submitted to QAD via e-mail to****EV.Export@usda.gov****.**

*USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.* 		Approved by____________JW

Dated Issued:   07/04/09

# image1.jpeg

# image2.png
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CAPSTEAD
SECURITIES CORPORATION IV'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              48
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               62
<BONDS>                                        178,393
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,741
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,379
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
offense and not the penalty in effect at the time of sentencing"); 2007 Nev. 

Stat., ch. 525, § 22, at 3196 (listing the effective date of the amendment to 

NRS 193.165 as July 1, 2007). Therefore, we conclude that the district 

court did not err by denying Lewis' motion. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.' 

Gibbons 

cc: Eighth Judicial District Court Dept. 15 

Willie Seal Lewis 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, 

NRAP 34(0(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review 

and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 

P.2d 910, 911 (1975). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

I.947A der