alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus II Incorporated
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report), I, Harry O. Nicodemus IV, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                          
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------
|Dated: November 15, 2004 |  |                          
|                         |  | /s/ Harry O. Nicodemus IV
|                         |  | Harry O. Nicodemus IV    
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer
MANDATE

Court of &ppeate

Jftrsft Mxtvitt of Cexa*

NO. 01-14-0078l-CV

DAVID A. BERRY, Appellant

V.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION AKA FANNIE MAE, Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 ofHarris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1049661).

TO THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF HARRIS COUNTY,

GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 22nd day ofJanuary, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

Appellant, David A. Berry, neither established indigence nor paid, or

made arrangements to pay, all the required fees. Further, appellant did not

timely file a brief. After being notified that this appeal was subject to

dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. It is therefore

CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the appeal be

dismissed.
Court of gppeafe

jftrsft Misitxitt of tEexa*

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00781-CV

David A. Berry

v.

Federal National Mortgage Association aka Fannie Mae

NO. 1049661 IN THE CO CIVIL CT AT LAW NO 4 OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MTFEE $10.00 12/19/2014 E-PAID APE

CLK RECORD $135.00 11/05/2014 PAID ANT

RPT RECORD $32.50 09/24/2014 NOT PAID STA

CLK RECORD $0.00 09/24/2014 UNKNOWN ANT

FILING $195.00 09/19/2014 NOT PAID ANT

The costs inicurred on appeal Ito the First Court <3f Appeals Houstc>n, Texas are

$372.50.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court'sjudgment

I, Christopher A. Princ, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby

certify that this is a true statement ofthe costs of appeal in this case.

aSfffiWKte.

!*/ ^ u|

'''''»mini»»»^

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my

hand and the seal ofthe Court of Appeals for the

First District ofTexas, this April 3, 2015.

(^KHi/^4-^, xvsr-»

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
Court of Appeals, First District

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

assitess

EXAS

CASE NO. 01-14-00781-CV

DAVID A. BERRY

13903 WOODFOREST BLVD.

HOUSTr

fjWf U.S.POSTAGE»PITNEYBOWES

M ST ft002 $000.48°

IVhrr 0001372104APR 03 20

NIXIE 77S 5E 1009 0004/14/15

RETURN TO SENDER

INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS

UNABLE TO FORWARD

3C: 77002206699 *2233 - 08937 - 03-44

!hUt,!)!j,,]i,t!,ii.<lh!i;M.!l..lH>>M!.!.IM.i..h.,..i,:i1
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7766** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JONATHON TERRELL PATTERSON, a/k/a Joe

- Joe , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 5:06

- cr - 00022

- RLV

- CH

- 12 )

Submitted : February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Jonathon Terrell Patterson , Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik , Amy Elizabeth Ray , Assistant United States Attorneys, Asheville, North Carolina; John Ge orge Guise , Thomas A. O ’ Malley , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Jonathon Terrell Patterson appeals the district court ’ s order gran ting his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) for a sentence reduction. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court

. United States v.
Patterson , No. 5:06

- cr - 00022

- RLV

- CH

- 12 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The district court granted Patterson’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, but did not reduce his sentence to the full extent he requested.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 128 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 128

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To clarify the primary functions and duties of the Office of Advocacy 
     of the Small Business Administration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Advocacy Improvements 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PRIMARY FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF 
              ADVOCACY OF THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Primary Functions.--Section 202 of Public Law 94-305 (15 U.S.C. 
634b) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``and the international 
        economy'' after ``economy'';
            (2) in paragraph (9), by striking ``complete'' and 
        inserting ``compete''; and
            (3) in paragraph (12), by striking ``serviced-disabled'' 
        and inserting ``service-disabled''.
    (b) Duties.--Section 203(a) of Public Law 94-305 (15 U.S.C. 634c) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) represent the views and interests of small businesses 
        before foreign governments and international entities for the 
        purpose of contributing to regulatory and trade initiatives 
        which may affect small businesses.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 8, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 128

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To clarify the primary functions and duties of the Office of Advocacy 
     of the Small Business Administration, and for other purposes.
```
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-11-01106-CV

MICHAEL WEBB, Appellant

V.

AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK, Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 985259).

TO THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF HARRIS COUNTY, 

GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 7th day of April 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or to 

reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

After inspecting the record of the court below, the Court 

holds that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over this appeal. 

Accordingly, the Court dismisses the appeal.

The Court orders that the appellant, Michael Webb, pay 

all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.
Judgment rendered April 7, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

April 17, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
81 P.3d 1217

SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I

December 29, 2003

24775

#### State v. Bayer

Affirmed
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES WALLACE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3302

[January 2, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-021355CF10A.

James Wallace, Sneads, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine 

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
OMB No. 0581-0178

Form K-1 (Exp. 3/31/2024) Destroy previous editions.

FAR WEST SPEARMINT OIL ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE

6601 W. Deschutes Ave., Suite C-2

Kennewick, WA 99336

Phone: (509) 585-5460 or Fax: (509) 585-2671

Application for Additional Base

CLASS 1 (SCOTCH)

Pursuant to section 985.153(c)(2) of Marketing Order No. 985, I hereby request that 

the appropriate quantity of additional base be issued to me effective June 1, 20___.

Additional Base Will be Added to:

(If more than one entity, please circle entity to receive additional base)

Signed ____________________________________________

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a 

collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0581-

0178. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 5 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing 

instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of 

information. 

In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its 

Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on 

race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, 

family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in 

any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by 

program or incident.

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American 

Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA 

through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. 

To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at 

http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of 

the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to 

USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 1400 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, 

employer, and lender.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0597

Directorate Identifier: 2012NM054AD

777-24-0106 --- 7/20/07

777-24-0112, R2 --- 12/14/11

777-24-0112, R1 --- 6/30/11

777-24-0112 --- 2/19/09

777-24-0106 IN 02 --- 5/29/08

777-24-0106 IN 01 --- 3/13/08

SECONDARY/CONCURRENT:

GE 3000ELM-24-698, R2 --- 2/3/11

GE 3000ELM-24-698, R1 --- 3/31/09

GE 3000ELM-24-698 --- 10/24/08

GE 2000ELM-24-697, R2 --- 2/3/11

GE 2000ELM-24-697, R1 --- 3/31/09

GE 2000ELM-24-697 --- 10/24/08

SMITHS 1000ELM-24-666, R1 --- 8/6/07

SMITHS 1000ELM-24-666 --- 6/20/07

SMITHS 2000ELM-24-667, R1 --- 8/13/07

SMITHS 2000ELM-24-667 --- 6/20/07

SMITHS 3000ELM-24-668, R1 --- 8/13/07

SMITHS 3000ELM-24-668 --- 6/20/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW., 

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# L_2004349EN.01003701.xml

| 25.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 349/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 349/37

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 80/2004

of 8 June 2004

amending Annex XV (State Aid) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XV to the Agreement was amended by the Agreement on the participation of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic in the European Economic Area signed on 14 October 2003 in Luxembourg (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XV to the Agreement was amended by the Agreement on the participation of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic in the European Economic Area signed on 14 October 2003 in Luxembourg (1).

| (2) | Council Regulation (EC) No 502/2004 of 11 March 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1177/2002 concerning a temporary defensive mechanism to shipbuilding (2), is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Council Regulation (EC) No 502/2004 of 11 March 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1177/2002 concerning a temporary defensive mechanism to shipbuilding (2), is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 1ca (Council Regulation (EC) No 1177/2002) in Annex XV to the Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32004 R 0502: Council Regulation (EC) No 502/2004 of 11 March 2004 (OJ L 81, 19.3.2004, p. 6).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32004 R 0502: Council Regulation (EC) No 502/2004 of 11 March 2004 (OJ L 81, 19.3.2004, p. 6).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 502/2004 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 June 2004, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

S. GILLESPIE

---

(1)  
  OJ L 130, 29.4.2004, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 81, 19.3.2004, p. 6.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
MOTION FOR EXTENSION

PAGE 1

NO. 05-14-00613-CV

_______________________________________________________

IN THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

_______________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.H.

JAMES L. HAMMETT,

Appellant,

v.

LISA MAARIE HAMMETT,

Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

APPELLEE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR FOUR-DAY

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

_______________________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

1. Appellee Lisa Hammett seeks an additional four-day extension to 

permit completion of a supplemental reporter’s record. The request is made solely

as the result of the transcripts not yet being completed by the court reporter.

2. Appellee Lisa Hammett’s brief is due on April 23, 2015. Appellee 

seeks a 4-day extension to make the brief due on April 27, 2015.

ACCEPTED

05-14-00613-CV

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

4/20/2015 9:37:30 AM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 4/20/2015 9:37:30 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
MOTION FOR EXTENSION

PAGE 2

3. This is Appellee’s third request for an extension on this brief. This 

Court previously granted Appellee two 30-day extensions.

4. On March 20, 2015, Appellee sought and obtained a 30-day extension

to permit the filing of a supplemental reporter’s record consisting of two hearing 

transcripts. As of the time this motion was filed, the court reporter had not 

completed and sent the supplemental record but will do so today (Monday, April 

20). 

5. Upon receipt of the transcripts, the undersigned needs 4-5 days to 

complete the brief, necessitating the short 4-day extension sought by this motion. 

6. Appellant does not oppose this motion.

Based on the foregoing, Appellee asks that the deadline to file her brief be 

extended to April 27, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Charles “Chad” Baruch

The Law Office of Chad Baruch

Texas Bar Number 01864300

3201 Main Street

Rowlett, Texas 75088

Telephone: (972) 412-7192

Facsimile: (972) 412-4028

E-Mail: baruchEsq@aol.com

Attorney for Appellee
MOTION FOR EXTENSION

PAGE 3

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned certifies that he conferred with Byron Henry, counsel for 

appellant, who stated that he does not oppose the relief sought by this motion.

/s/Charles “Chad” Baruch

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of this instrument was 

served upon all counsel of record by e-filing and by email to 

bhenry@cowlesthompson.com on April 20, 2015.

/s/Charles “Chad” Baruch
**EXHIBIT 32.2** **CERTIFICATION    OF PERIODIC REPORT**     I, Thomas W. Stoltz, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial    Officer of The Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this    Certification:     1.     the Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of the Company for the annual period ended February 2, 2008    (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     Dated: April 1, 2008     /s/ Thomas W. Stoltz    Thomas W. Stoltz    Executive Vice President    Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22

- 0299

JAIMI L. ESPY,

Plaintiff and Appellant

,

vs.

BRIAN A. LAGRECA, MD,

Defendant and Appellee

.

Pursuant to MRAP 26(1), counsel for Plaintiff

- Appellant Jaimi L. Espy is given an

extension of time until September 12, 2022 , in which to prepare, file, and serve Plaintiff

Appellant Jaimi L. Espy’s opening brief in this matter.

Dated this ___ of August, 2022.

For the Co urt,

By__________________

_______ ORDER

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 10 2022

08/10/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0299
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE I

THE INTERNAL MARKET

THE INTERNAL MARKET

Article 27

(ex Article 15 TEC)

(ex Article 15 TEC)

When drawing up its proposals with a view to achieving the objectives set out in Article 26, the Commission shall take into account the extent of the effort that certain economies showing differences in development will have to sustain for the establishment of the internal market and it may propose appropriate provisions.

If these provisions take the form of derogations, they must be of a temporary nature and must cause the least possible disturbance to the functioning of the internal market.

---
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: December 12, 2008
    /s/ Mark A. LibratoreMark A. Libratore, Chief Executive Officer