alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



The undersigned officers of AutoImmune Inc. (the Company) hereby certify that, as of the date of this statement, the Companys quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act) and that, to the best of their
knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2004 and the results of operations of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.



The purpose of this certification is solely to comply with
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This statement is not filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise
subject to the liabilities of that Act or any other federal or state law or regulation.



|                      |  |                                           
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert C. Bishop                      
|                      |  | Name: Robert C. Bishop                    
|                      |  | Title:   Chief Executive Officer          
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Heather A. Ellerkamp                  
|                      |  | Name: Heather A. Ellerkamp                
|                      |  | Title:   Director of Finance and Treasurer
#### Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. The SOUTHERN INVESTMENT COMPANY.

No. 2015.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 20, 1939.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Thomas D. Lyons, of Tulsa, Okl., for respondent.

Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petition dismissed on motion of petitioner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                          WIRELESS TELECOM GROUP, INC.
                                   EXHIBIT 27
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X

The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                            0000878828
<NAME>                         WIRELESS TELECOM GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1
<CURRENCY>                                              USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                           22,324,337
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,493,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                         55,637
<INVENTORY>                                       1,809,435
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 26,382,843
<PP&E>                                            1,969,077
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,294,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   34,135,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               863,784
<BONDS>                                           3,331,264
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               178,409
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                       29,555,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     34,135,359
<SALES>                                           4,436,886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4,436,886
<CGS>                                             1,340,101
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,340,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2,444,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     10,956
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,407,030
<INCOME-TAX>                                        549,542
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 857,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        857,488
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.05


</TABLE>
AMENDED AND RESTATED BORROWER
PARTNERSHIP SECURITY AGREEMENT
  PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



12




---



##### 



BANK OF MONTREAL, AS SECURED PARTYBy:Name:Title:Notice Address:     Attn: Heather Turf115 LaSalle Street, 12W
                    Chicago, Illinois 60603 AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC.,
A DELAWARE CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Robert L. FringerTitle:     Vice President & SecretaryNotice Address:Maryland Farms Office Park
               5200 Maryland Way, Suite 400
               Brentwood,

Tennessee 37027-5018
               Attn: Chief Executive Officer 13




---



##### 



SCHEDULE A
 PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
 BorrowersOther Partners,
    
    OwnershipPartnership
    
    Shareholders and Members
    
    InterestAHP Alliance of Columbia
    
    
    
    100%AHP Home Care Alliance of Gainesville
    
    
    
    100%AHP Home Care Alliance of Tennessee
    
    
    
    100%AHP Home Care Alliance of Virginia
    
    
    
    100%AHP Home Medical Equipment Partnership
of Texas
    
    
    
    100%AHP Knoxville Partnership
    
    
    
    100%AHP, L.P.
    
    
    
    100%American HomePatient of Texas, L.P.
    
    
    
    100%Colorado Home Medical Equipment
Alliance, LLC
    
    
    
    100%Northeast Pennsylvania Alliance, LLC
    
    
    
    100%AHP-MHR Home Care, LLP
    
    MHR Home Care, Inc.
    
    50%AHP Delmarva, LLP
    
    Peninsula Regional Medical Center
    
    50%American HomePatient of Sanford, LLC
    
    Amisub of North Carolina, Inc. dba
    
    50%Central Carolina HospitalAmerican HomePatient of Unifour, LLC
    
    Frye Regional Medical Center,
    
    50%Grace Hospital and CaldwellMemorial HospitalBaptist Ventures AHP Homecare Alliance
    
    Baptist Medical Center
    
    50%Blue Ridge Home Care
    
    Spruce Pine Community Hospital
    
    50%Coastal Home Care
    
    Conway Hospital
    
    70%Health State DME, Ltd.
    
    High Plains Baptist Hospital
    
    50%HomeLink Home Healthcare Partnership
    
    Home Link Home Health Care
    
    50%Services, Inc.Piedmont Medical Equipment
    
    Piedmont Medical Center/ Tenet
    
    50%HealthcarePro Med
    
    Union County Health Care Foundation
    
    70%Shared Care  West Branch, LLC
    
    West Branch Regional Medical Center
    
    50%




---



##### 



BorrowersOther Partners,
    
    OwnershipPartnership
    
    Shareholders and Members
    
    InterestTotal Home Care of East Alabama, L.L.C.
    
    East Alabama Medical Center
    
    50%
 15




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A

BANKS




---



##### 



17
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50370

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Benedicto Martinez-Sario, also known as Benedicto SarioMartinez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:20-CR-92-1

Before Haynes, Willett, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Benedicto Martinez-Sario appeals his sentence of 14 months of 

imprisonment and three years of supervised release following his guilty plea 

to illegal reentry into the United States after deportation. He contends that 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 6, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50370 Document: 00515629731 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/06/2020
No. 20-50370

2

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it permits a sentence above 

the otherwise-applicable statutory maximum, based on facts that are neither 

alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. 

While Martinez-Sario acknowledges this argument is foreclosed by 

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), he nevertheless 

seeks to preserve it for possible Supreme Court review. 

The Supreme Court held in Almendarez-Torres that, for purposes of a 

statutory sentencing enhancement, a prior conviction is not a fact that must 

be alleged in the indictment or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. 

523 U.S. at 239-47. This court has held that subsequent Supreme Court 

decisions, such as Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013) and Apprendi 

v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See 

United States v. Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. 

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007). Thus, MartinezSario is correct that his argument is foreclosed, and summary affirmance is 

appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th 

Cir. 1969). 

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, 

the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED, and the Government’s 

alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED as 

moot. 

Case: 20-50370 Document: 00515629731 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/06/2020
Exhibit 11.1

WIRELESS TELECOM GROUP, INC.COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS(Unaudited)

|                                         |  |                      |            |                     |  |   |            |  |   |            |   |  |   |           
|---------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | ---------- | ------------------- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | ---------- | - |  | - | ----------
|                                         |  | For the Three Months |            | For the Nine Months
|                                         |  | Ended September 30,  |            | Ended September 30,
|                                         |  |                      | 2008       |                     |  |   | 2007       |  |   | 2008       |   |  |   | 2007      
|Net Income (Loss)                        |  | $                    | (510,148   | )                   |  | $ | 941,937    |  | $ | (2,028,941 | ) |  | $ | 2,608,927 
|BASIC EARNINGS:                          |  |                      |            |                     |  |   |            |  |   |            |   |  |   |           
|Weighted average number of common shares |  |                      |            |                     |  |   |            |  |   |            |   |  |   |           
|outstanding                              |  |                      | 25,658,203 |                     |  |   | 25,914,099 |  |   | 25,730,629 |   |  |   | 25,877,129
|Basic earnings (loss) per common share   |  | $                    | (0.02      | )                   |  | $ | 0.04       |  | $ | (0.08      | ) |  | $ | 0.10      
|DILUTED EARNINGS:                        |  |                      |            |                     |  |   |            |  |   |            |   |  |   |           
|Weighted average number of common shares |  |                      |            |                     |  |   |            |  |   |            |   |  |   |           
|outstanding                              |  |                      | 25,658,203 |                     |  |   | 25,914,099 |  |   | 25,730,629 |   |  |   | 25,877,129
|Assumed exercise of stock options        |  |                      | -          |                     |  |   | 128,088    |  |   | -          |   |  |   | 190,732   
|Weighted average number of common shares |  |                      |            |                     |  |   |            |  |   |            |   |  |   |           
|outstanding, as adjusted                 |  |                      | 25,658,203 |                     |  |   | 26,042,187 |  |   | 25,730,629 |   |  |   | 26,067,861
|Diluted earnings (loss) per common share |  | $                    | (0.02      | )                   |  | $ | 0.04       |  | $ | (0.08      | ) |  | $ | 0.10      

---
# C_2016202EN.01005901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/59

---

Article 27

(ex Article 15 TEC)

(ex Article 15 TEC)

When drawing up its proposals with a view to achieving the objectives set out in Article 26, the Commission shall take into account the extent of the effort that certain economies showing differences in development will have to sustain for the establishment of the internal market and it may propose appropriate provisions.

If these provisions take the form of derogations, they must be of a temporary nature and must cause the least possible disturbance to the functioning of the internal market.

---
Employment Agreement

This Agreement incorporates the employment arrangement between ILC and you as of
the date executed below:

1.       Your title,  duties and  compensation  in the  subsequent  organization
         shall be  described  to you  prior to the  change  of  ownership.  Your
         compensation  and package of benefits as a whole shall be  commensurate
         with your new duties.  Your tenure with  Sunrise  will include the time
         you have been an  employee  of ILC as it  relates to  benefits  and any
         other criteria that utilizes tenure of employment.

2.       If you join the new organization and:

          a) Your title,  duties,  package of  benefits  as a whole  (other than
          changes  which are  applicable  to all other  employees of Sunrise) or
          compensation changes significantly subsequent to the merger and during
          the  guarantee  period in a manner  adverse  to you and  without  your
          written consent, or

          b) You are  terminated  for any reason  other  than gross  misconduct,
          embezzlement, fraud, theft, or being found guilty of a felony, and

          c) You do not  resign  voluntarily  (other  than  as a  result  of the
          circumstances described in 2(a) above),

          you shall receive  minimum  compensation  of $100,000 per year for the
          unexpired  term of this  two-year  employment  compensation  guarantee
          period.  The two-year guarantee period shall commence on the first day
          of your employment with Sunrise.

If your employment  ceases during the first year, you shall receive your minimum
monthly salary for the remainder of the year and your guaranteed bonus plus your
full Guaranteed Minimum Amount for the second year.

If your employment is terminated  during the second year, you shall receive your
minimum monthly salary for the remainder of the year and your guaranteed bonus.

These amounts shall be paid upon termination of your employment.

Your compensation guarantee is calculated as follows:

         Salary                             $6,250/month
         Bonus                              $25,000/annual

         Total Annual Guaranteed Minimum Amount    $100,000

INTERNATIONAL LEASING CORPORATION         I agree to the above.


Signed:  /s/ Peter J. King                Signed:  /s/ William B. King
Name:    Peter J. King                    Name:    William B. King
Date:    October 14, 1994                 Date:    October 14, 1994
Notice to Exporters – South Korea 

This notice to exporters is intended to provide an update on the situation affecting US exports of egg 

products to South Korea and to update stakeholders on the status of USDA efforts to address the time 

and temperature requirements.

Korea's Quarantine Inspection Agency (QIA) has provided official clarification of the time and 

temperature requirements for U.S. egg products. According to QIA, these requirements have been in 

place for a long time to prevent salmonella in egg products but, since the December HPAI outbreaks in 

Washington and Oregon, the Government of Korea (GOK) is now requiring that all export certificates for 

U.S. egg products include a statement indicating the cooking temperature and time. 

As it now stands, US eggs products may enter Korea only if the heat treatment statement is included on 

the export certificate issued by the competent authority. Korea is now enforcing the following 

requirements for all eggs products (all egg components have been heated at a minimum of): 

• If the egg product is produced on or prior to 11/24/2014 and was shipped on or prior to 

12/19/2014, needs to state on the certificate that it was “pasteurized” or “indicate the heat 

treatment time and temperature.” The temp/time does not need to meet the Korean heat 

treatment temp/time requirement for products that were produced or shipped during this time 

frame.

• If the egg product is produced on or after 11/25/2014 or shipped on or after 12/20/2014, it 

needs to be accompanied with the government certificate that certifies that the core 

temperature of the egg product meets the Korean temperature requirement:

 80° C for 1 minute;

 75° C for 2 minutes; 

 64° C for 4.5 minutes; 

 60° C for 5 minutes, or 

 55° C for 15 minutes. 

• There is no import prohibition period for processed egg products if it is certified with a 

government health certificate that attests to the fact that the temperature of the center portion 

of the product meets the Korean requirement.

• If the certificate can certify that fully cooked products containing egg ingredients have been 

heat treated (the internal core temperature and time has to meet the temp/time listed above 

for products produced on or after 11/25/2014 or shipped on or after 12/20/2014), then there is 

no need to get a separate heat/time certificate for the egg products that were used as an 

ingredient. I.e., certify the egg ingredients’ temperature treatment or certify the internal core 

temperature treatment for the final product that contains the egg ingredients.
Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers


The undersigned firm of Independent  Petroleum Engineers,  of Calgary,  Alberta,
Canada, knows that it is named as having prepared an evaluation of the interests
of Canada Southern  Petroleum Ltd.,  dated March 10, 2000,  prepared for filings
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on Form 10-K 1999, and hereby gives
its consent to the use of its name and to the use of the said estimates.



                                             Paddock Lindstrom & Associates Ltd.



                                                        /s/ L. K. Lindstrom
                                                        L. K. Lindstrom, P. Eng.
                                                        President
Conversation with Wastewater Technologies, November, 2010.

To improve nutrient retention in septic systems, Biomicrobics manufactures RetroFAST, which

is a retroactive addition to existing septic systems and drainfields. The system is a fixed-film

activated sludge process. Costs are in the range of $1,650 plus an additional $400 to $500 for

installation.
# L_2012112EN.01004101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ANNEX III

List referred to in Article 15 of the Act of Accession: adaptations to acts adopted by the institutions

List referred to in Article 15 of the Act of Accession: adaptations to acts adopted by the institutions

8.   ENVIRONMENT

ENVIRONMENT

| 1. | 32003 L 0087: Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).






  (a) | In Article 9, the following sentence is added to the first paragraph:
  ‘The Community-wide quantity of allowances will be increased as a result of Croatia's accession only by the quantity of allowances that Croatia shall auction pursuant to Article 10(1).’. |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

32003 L 0087: Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).

(a)

In Article 9, the following sentence is added to the first paragraph:

‘The Community-wide quantity of allowances will be increased as a result of Croatia's accession only by the quantity of allowances that Croatia shall auction pursuant to Article 10(1).’.

| (b) | In Annex IIa, the following is inserted after the entry for Spain:






  ‘Croatia | 26 %’. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

In Annex IIa, the following is inserted after the entry for Spain:

‘Croatia

26 %’.

| 2. | 32009 D 0406: Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community's greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020 (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 136).
  In Annex II, the following is inserted after the entry for France:






  ‘Croatia | 11 %’. |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

32009 D 0406: Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community's greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020 (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 136).

In Annex II, the following is inserted after the entry for France:

‘Croatia

11 %’.

---
Page 1 of 2

ePACA Portal - First Time Users for New License or Complaint Submissions

If you’ve never logged in to the ePACA Portal, you will first need to get a USDA 

eAuthentication account.

Go to the eAuthentication registration page at: 

https://www.eauth.usda.gov/eauth/b/usda/registration

• Choose “Customer”, Click “Continue” button, follow the instructions to submit the required

information (email);

• You will receive an e-mail to activate your eAuth account. Once you’ve activated your

eAuth account, you can login to the ePACA Portal with your username and password.

New Business Entity Registration

1. Login to the USDA

eAuthentication page by

entering your User ID and

password, and clicking on the

LOGIN button.

**Use the Google Chrome web 

browser when using the ePACA 

Portal.

If you do not have Chrome on 

your computer, you can download 

it here: 

https://www.google.com/chrome/

Go to the ePACA Portal website at this link: https://apps.mrp.usda.gov/epaca
Page 2 of 2

2. You will see a screen to “Add

Entity to your account.”

If you have never held a PACA 

license, select “No” for the 

first question and enter:

• Name of Business

• City

• State

3. You will then be brought to

your ePACA Portal business

page, where you can access

online services to submit a

new license application or file

a complaint.