alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01014901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/149 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/149

---

Article 223

(ex Article 190(4) and (5) TEC)

(ex Article 190(4) and (5) TEC)

1.   The European Parliament shall draw up a proposal to lay down the provisions necessary for the election of its Members by direct universal suffrage in accordance with a uniform procedure in all Member States or in accordance with principles common to all Member States.

The Council, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, which shall act by a majority of its component Members, shall lay down the necessary provisions. These provisions shall enter into force following their approval by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

2.   The European Parliament, acting by means of regulations on its own initiative in accordance with a special legislative procedure after seeking an opinion from the Commission and with the consent of the Council, shall lay down the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the duties of its Members. All rules or conditions relating to the taxation of Members or former Members shall require unanimity within the Council.

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has det ermined t hat this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60375

(Summary Calendar)

MAURICE H. SOCHIA

and

BEATRICE M. SOCHIA,

Petitioners-Appell ants,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the Decision of

the United States Tax Court

(26675-93)

April 18, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Maurice H. Sochia and Beatrice M. Sochia (the “Sochias” ) appeal the decision of the Tax

Court dismissing their action and affirming the Commissioner’s determination of a tax deficiency and

additions thereto for the taxable years 1990 and 1991. The Sochias also seek review of the Tax

Court’s imposition of a $4,000 penalty as sanctions under Internal Revenue Code section 6673.

We have reviewed the record and briefs and we affirm the Tax Court.2

By separate motion, the Commissioner seeks sanctions agains t the Sochi as pursuant to

F EDERAL R ULES OF A PPELLATE P ROCEDURE 38(a) fo r t heir having filed a frivolous appeal. The

Commissioner points out that the Sochias instituted this case after we recently rejected identical tax

protester claims in another case invo lvin g t hem and imposed sanctions for frivolous appeal. See

Sochia v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

, 23 F.3d 941 (5th Cir. 1994). The Sochias respond to

the Commissioner’s motion for sanctions by reiterating their frivolous contentions re garding the

merits. Because of the frivolous arguments advanced by the Sochias in this appeal and their failure

to heed our previ o us caution, we find that sanctions are warranted. Accordingly, we impose

sanctions upon Maurice H. Sochia and Beatrice M. Sochia in the amount of $2,000 payable to the

Treasury of the United States..

The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED, SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
Formal Recommendation by the 

National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) 

to the National Organic Program (NOP)

 

Date: October 28, 2010 

Subject: Sunset Review of Pectin (low methoxy) as listed on §205.605 (b), 

nonagricultural (nonorganic) synthetic substances allowed as 

ingredients in or on processed products labeled as “organic” or 

“made with organic (specified ingredients or food group(s)).” 

Chair: Daniel G. Giacomini 

 

 

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action X 

 

 

Statement of the Recommendation (Including Recount of Vote): 

 

Pectin (low methoxy) is listed on 205.605(b). This substance was scheduled to 

sunset off the National List in 2012, was reviewed by the NOSB, and a motion 

was made for the re-listing of this substance at the October 2010 meeting. The 

motion passed by a vote of 14 yes, 0 no, 0 abstentions, 0 absent, and 0 

recusals. 

 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with 

OFPA and NOP): 

 

The Handling Committee’s recommendation covering this material is attached. 

There were no public written or verbal comments opposing the committee’s 

recommendation, and the material was recommended for relisting by the full 

NOSB as shown below. 

 

NOSB Vote: 

Moved: Joe Smillie Second: Steve DeMuri 

Yes: 14 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recusal: 0 
National Organic Standards Board 

Handling Committee 

Sunset Recommendation – 2012 

Pectin (Low-methoxy) 

August 30, 2010 

List: 205.605 Nonagricultural (nonorganic) substances allowed as ingredients in 

or on processed products labeled as “organic” or “made with organic (specified 

ingredients or food group(s)).” 

(b) Synthetics allowed 

Pectin (low-methoxy) 

Committee Summary 

Federal register notice of the sunset of these materials elicited no public comments 

against re-listing. 

Review of the original recommendation, historical documents, and public comments 

does not reveal unacceptable risks to the environment, human, or animal health as a 

result of the use or manufacture of this material. There is new information contained in 

the petition and technical review contradicting the original technical review which was 

the basis for the previous NOSB decision to list this material. The Handling committee 

has examined this and issued a recommendation. 

Committee Recommendation(s)

The handling committee recommends the renewal of the following substance in this use 

category as published in the final rule: 

Pectin (low-methoxy) 

Committee Vote 

Motion: Joe Smillie Second: Steve DeMuri 

Yes: 6 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 1
# C_2016202EN.01012701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/127

---

Article 175

(ex Article 159 TEC)

(ex Article 159 TEC)

Member States shall conduct their economic policies and shall coordinate them in such a way as, in addition, to attain the objectives set out in Article 174. The formulation and implementation of the Union's policies and actions and the implementation of the internal market shall take into account the objectives set out in Article 174 and shall contribute to their achievement. The Union shall also support the achievement of these objectives by the action it takes through the Structural Funds (European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guidance Section; European Social Fund; European Regional Development Fund), the European Investment Bank and the other existing Financial Instruments.

The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions every three years on the progress made towards achieving economic, social and territorial cohesion and on the manner in which the various means provided for in this Article have contributed to it. This report shall, if necessary, be accompanied by appropriate proposals.

If specific actions prove necessary outside the Funds and without prejudice to the measures decided upon within the framework of the other Union policies, such actions may be adopted by the European Parliament and the Council acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

---
# C_2016202EN.01011801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/118 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/118

---

Article 158

(ex Article 142 TEC)

(ex Article 142 TEC)

Member States shall endeavour to maintain the existing equivalence between paid holiday schemes.

---
National Organic Standards Board

Handling Committee

2013 Sunset Proposal

Glucono Delta-Lactone on § 205.605(a)

March 20, 2012

Current National List Citation

List: 205.605 Nonagricultural (nonorganic) substances allowed as ingredients in or on 

processed products labeled as “organic” or “made with organic (specified ingredients 

or food group(s)).” 

(a) Nonsynthetics allowed 

Glucono delta-lactone—production by the oxidation of D-glucose with bromine water 

is prohibited.

Committee Summary

Glucono delta-lactone (GDL) is used as a coagulant in tofu production, and also as an 

acidulant, leavening agent and sequestrant in food. It is produced by the oxidization of gluconic 

acid by a number of methods. The petition focused on the use of the substance as a tofu 

coagulant, and delineated a number of key advantages which make the use of this substance 

necessary relative to other coagulants. Because of the slow speed at which hydrolyzes back to 

gluconic acid, it results in tofu products with preferable texture and consistency. It also imparts 

a far less sour taste than other available coagulants. 

The substance was reviewed by a Technical Advisory Panel (TAP) in 2002 at the request of 

the NOSB. The TAP found that the substance can be either synthetic or non-synthetic 

depending on the production method, and the current annotation prohibits its production using 

bromine water, which would render it synthetic. The other methods of GDL production – 

oxidation of gluconic acid with microorganisms, or oxidation with enzymes derived from those 

microorganisms – result in a non-synthetic form of GDL. 

Review of the original recommendation, the 2002 TAP review, historical documents, the 2007 

sunset recommendation, and public comments does not reveal unacceptable risks to the 

environment, human, or animal health as a result of the use or manufacture of this material. 

There is no new information contradicting the original recommendation which was the basis for 

the previous NOSB decisions to list and again re-list this material. 

Committee Recommendation

The handling committee recommends the renewal of the following substance in this use 

category as published in the final rule:

Glucono delta-lactone—production by the oxidation of D-glucose with bromine water is 

prohibited.

HC 1 Sunset 2013 GDL
Committee Vote

Motion: John Foster Second: Tracy Favre

Yes: 5 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Recuse: 0 Absent: 1 

HC 2 Sunset 2013 GDL
# C_2016202EN.01034801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/348 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/348

---

31.   Declaration on Article 156 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 156 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference confirms that the policies described in Article 156 fall essentially within the competence of the Member States. Measures to provide encouragement and promote coordination to be taken at Union level in accordance with this Article shall be of a complementary nature. They shall serve to strengthen cooperation between Member States and not to harmonise national systems. The guarantees and practices existing in each Member State as regards the responsibility of the social partners will not be affected.

This Declaration is without prejudice to the provisions of the Treaties conferring competence on the Union, including in social matters.

---
# C_2016202EN.01034301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/343 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/343

---

15.   Declaration on Article 27 of the Treaty on European Union

Declaration on Article 27 of the Treaty on European Union

The Conference declares that, as soon as the Treaty of Lisbon is signed, the Secretary-General of the Council, High Representative for the common foreign and security policy, the Commission and the Member States should begin preparatory work on the European External Action Service.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1569 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1569

To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff and Yuma to the 
list of locations in which court shall be held in the judicial district 
                       for the State of Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2019

Mr. O'Halleran (for himself, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Gosar, 
Mr. Biggs, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Gallego, and Mrs. Lesko) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff and Yuma to the 
list of locations in which court shall be held in the judicial district 
                       for the State of Arizona.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT COURTS IN THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT FOR THE STATE OF 
              ARIZONA.

    Section 82 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, and Tucson'' and inserting ``Flagstaff, 
Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson, and Yuma''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 2

SECTION 2

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL

Article 236

The European Council shall adopt by a qualified majority:

| (a) | a decision establishing the list of Council configurations, other than those of the General Affairs Council and of the Foreign Affairs Council, in accordance with Article 16(6) of the Treaty on European Union; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

a decision establishing the list of Council configurations, other than those of the General Affairs Council and of the Foreign Affairs Council, in accordance with Article 16(6) of the Treaty on European Union;

| (b) | a decision on the Presidency of Council configurations, other than that of Foreign Affairs, in accordance with Article 16(9) of the Treaty on European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

a decision on the Presidency of Council configurations, other than that of Foreign Affairs, in accordance with Article 16(9) of the Treaty on European Union.

---
# C_2016202EN.01005001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/50

---

Article 2

1.   When the Treaties confer on the Union exclusive competence in a specific area, only the Union may legislate and adopt legally binding acts, the Member States being able to do so themselves only if so empowered by the Union or for the implementation of Union acts.

2.   When the Treaties confer on the Union a competence shared with the Member States in a specific area, the Union and the Member States may legislate and adopt legally binding acts in that area. The Member States shall exercise their competence to the extent that the Union has not exercised its competence. The Member States shall again exercise their competence to the extent that the Union has decided to cease exercising its competence.

3.   The Member States shall coordinate their economic and employment policies within arrangements as determined by this Treaty, which the Union shall have competence to provide.

4.   The Union shall have competence, in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty on European Union, to define and implement a common foreign and security policy, including the progressive framing of a common defence policy.

5.   In certain areas and under the conditions laid down in the Treaties, the Union shall have competence to carry out actions to support, coordinate or supplement the actions of the Member States, without thereby superseding their competence in these areas.

Legally binding acts of the Union adopted on the basis of the provisions of the Treaties relating to these areas shall not entail harmonisation of Member States' laws or regulations.

6.   The scope of and arrangements for exercising the Union's competences shall be determined by the provisions of the Treaties relating to each area.

---
### Served : October 13 , 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 13 th of October , 2010

Essential Air Service at

El Centro/Imperial, California

Un der 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. DOCKET OST

- 200 8

- 02 99

NOTICE OF EXTENSION

By letter dated September 23, 2010, we requested comments regarding the proposals by

SkyWest Airlines, Inc., and Alaska Juneau Aeronautics, Inc., d/b/a SeaPort Airlines for

EAS at El Centro/Imperial, California , no later than October 21 . By email dated

October 13 , 20 10

, Mr. Bill Turner, the airport manager, requested a two

- week extension

, i.e., to November 4 to respond

.

W e have decided to grant the request , as the additional amou nt of time is not unreasonable.

All parties should file their comments no later than November 4 , 20 10

.

Dennis DeVany, Chief,

EAS and Domestic Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,799
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,124
<PP&E>                                         701,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 949,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,797
<BONDS>                                        292,603
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           492
<OTHER-SE>                                     445,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   949,316
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,512
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   693
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,792
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,532
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,260
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,260
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 21994A0103(28) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 21994A0103(28)

**Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 27 on cooperation in the field of State aid **

*
Official Journal L 001 , 03/01/1994 P. 0193 - 0194 *

PROTOCOL 27

on cooperation in the field of State aid

In order to ensure a uniform implementation, application and interpretation of the rules on State aid throughout the territory of the Contracting Parties as well as to guarantee their harmonious development, the EC Commission and the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall observe the following rules:

(a) exchange of information and views on general policy issues such as the implementation, application and interpretation of the rules on State aid set out in the Agreement shall be held periodically or at the request of either surveillance authority;

(b) the EC Commission and the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall periodically prepare surveys on State aid in their respective States. These surveys shall be made available to the other surveillance authority;

(c) if the procedure referred to in the first and second subparagraphs of Article 93(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community or the corresponding procedure set out in an agreement between the EFTA States establishing the EFTA Surveillance Authority is opened for State aid programmes and cases, the EC Commission or the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall give notice to the other surveillance authority as well as to the parties concerned to submit their comments;

(d) the surveillance authorities shall inform each other of all decisions as soon as they are taken;

(e) the opening of the procedure referred to in paragraph (c) and the decisions referred to in paragraph (d) shall be published by the competent surveillance authorities;

(f) notwithstanding the provisions of this Protocol, the EC Commission and the EFTA Surveillance Authority shall, at the request of the other surveillance authority, provide on a case-by-case basis information and exchange views on individual State aid programmes and cases;

(g) information obtained in accordance with paragraph (f) shall be treated as confidential.
Exhibit 10.7
  MODIFICATION
    AGREEMENT
  DATE:      February
    12, 2008
  PARTIES:

Borrower:

WHITE ELECTRONIC DESIGNS CORPORATION, 
    an Indiana corporationBank:

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Administrative 
    Agent and Lender   RECITALS:
        AGREEMENT:
    Section 1. ACCURACY
    OF RECITALS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.
    Section 2. MODIFICATION
    OF CREDIT DOCUMENTS; OTHER AGREEMENTS.
  Section 6.06
  Section 6.06 Restricted
    Payments.




---



##### 



Section 3. RATIFICATION
    OF CREDIT DOCUMENTS AND COLLATERAL.
    Section 4. BORROWER
    REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES.
                Section 5. BORROWER
    COVENANTS.
        Section 6. CONDITIONS.
       2




---



##### 



Section 7. INTEGRATION,
    ENTIRE AGREEMENT, CHANGE, DISCHARGE, TERMINATION, OR
    WAIVER.
    Section 8. BINDING
    EFFECT.
    Section 9. CHOICE
    OF LAW.
    Section 10. COUNTERPART
    EXECUTION.
      
   
        
  
       3