alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01018601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/186 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/186

---

Article 319

(ex Article 276 TEC)

(ex Article 276 TEC)

1.   The European Parliament, acting on a recommendation from the Council, shall give a discharge to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the budget. To this end, the Council and the European Parliament in turn shall examine the accounts, the financial statement and the evaluation report referred to in Article 318, the annual report by the Court of Auditors together with the replies of the institutions under audit to the observations of the Court of Auditors, the statement of assurance referred to in Article 287(1), second subparagraph and any relevant special reports by the Court of Auditors.

2.   Before giving a discharge to the Commission, or for any other purpose in connection with the exercise of its powers over the implementation of the budget, the European Parliament may ask to hear the Commission give evidence with regard to the execution of expenditure or the operation of financial control systems. The Commission shall submit any necessary information to the European Parliament at the latter's request.

3.   The Commission shall take all appropriate steps to act on the observations in the decisions giving discharge and on other observations by the European Parliament relating to the execution of expenditure, as well as on comments accompanying the recommendations on discharge adopted by the Council.

At the request of the European Parliament or the Council, the Commission shall report on the measures taken in the light of these observations and comments and in particular on the instructions given to the departments which are responsible for the implementation of the budget. These reports shall also be forwarded to the Court of Auditors.

---
# EUR-Lex - 22003D0113 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22003D0113

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 113/2003 of 26 September 2003 amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 331 , 18/12/2003 P. 0030 - 0031 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 113/2003

of 26 September 2003

amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 46/2003 of 16 May 2003(1).

(2) Decision No 187 of 27 June 2002 on model forms necessary for the application of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 and (EEC) No 574/72 (E 111 and E 111B)(2), is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 3.62 (Decision No 186) of Annex VI to the Agreement:

"3.63. 32003 D 0251: Decision No 187 of 27 June 2002 on model forms necessary for the application of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 and (EEC) No 574/72 (E 111 and E 111B) (OJ L 93, 10.4.2003, p. 40)."

Article 2

The texts of Decision No 187 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 27 September 2003, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(3).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 26 September 2003.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

H. S. H. Prinz Nikolaus von Liechtenstein

(1) OJ L 193, 31.7.2003, p. 16.

(2) OJ L 93, 10.4.2003, p. 40.

(3) No constitutional requirements indicated.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.7


                               SECOND AMENDMENT
                                    TO THE
                               ON SEMICONDUCTOR
                             AMENDED AND RESTATED
                     EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


      Effective December 13, 1999, ON Semiconductor (the "Company") adopted the
ON Semiconductor Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. The Plan was amended and
restated as the ON Semiconductor Amended and Restated Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan ("Plan") effective March 31, 2000, and subsequently amended on
one occasion. By this instrument, the Company desires to amend the Plan to
permit participants to change their deferral election once during each year with
the change to be effective for the following calendar quarter.

            1. This Amendment shall amend only those provisions specified herein
and those provisions amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect.

            2. The second sentence of Section 3.3 is hereby deleted and replaced
with the following sentence, to read as follows:

            If the Employee does not timely notify the Plan Administrator of his
            intent to participate in the Plan, the Employee's participation may
            commence on the first payroll period following or coinciding with
            the first day of the next calendar quarter by notifying the Plan
            Administrator prior to the first day of such calendar quarter and
            provided further that the Plan Administrator determines that the
            employee remains eligible to participate in the Plan under Section
            3.1.

            3.    Section 4.2 of the Plan is amended and restated in its
entirety, to read as follows:

                  4.2 DESIGNATION AND CHANGE OF DESIGNATION OF PARTICIPANT
            CONTRIBUTION. All designations or changes of designation of the
            amount of Participant Deferral Contributions will be made on forms
            supplied by, or acceptable to, the Plan Administrator, signed by the
            Participant and delivered to the Plan Administrator. A change in the
            designation is

<PAGE>

            effective as of the beginning of the first payroll period following
            the first day of the next calendar quarter after the notice is
            received by the Plan Administrator; provided that a Participant may
            change his rate of contributions only once during each Plan Year,
            including a change to reduce his rate of contributions to zero. A
            payroll deduction form is effective for all future Plan Years until
            it is succeeded by another valid payroll deduction designation form
            or until the Participant's right to make Participant Deferrals is
            otherwise suspended or terminated.

      4.    This Amendment shall be effective January 1, 2002.


                                      -2-
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00441-CR

JOSHUA LONDON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 230th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1367861).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on May 3, 

2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised 

by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible error. 

Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered April 16, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Brown. Opinion delivered by Justice 

Massengale.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification**

**Pursuant        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections        (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States        Code)**

|                                |                                                                                                                                             |                                                   |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  May 14, 2007 | By:                                                                                                                                    | /s/                  Noah Berkowitz, M.D., Ph.D.  |
|                                | Noah                  Berkowitz, M.D., Ph.D.President                  and Chief Executive Officer(principal                  executive officer) |
|                                |                                                                                                |                                        |
|-------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                           |                                                                                           |                                   |
| Date:                  May 14, 2007 | By:                                                                                       | /s/                  Jeffrey P. Stein  |
|                                | Jeffrey                  P. Stein, CPA(principal                  financial and accounting officer) |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, January 10, 2013 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and litigation matters.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

 Dated: January 3, 2013.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2013-00126 Filed 1-3-13; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Taiwan Health Certificate Worksheet

   *additional charges apply
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                      275
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               616
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 21
<INVENTORY>                                                 451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          1,448
<PP&E>                                                   11,871<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                            4,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            9,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     1,020
<BONDS>                                                   3,194
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                     56
<OTHER-SE>                                                3,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              9,111
<SALES>                                                   5,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          5,736
<CGS>                                                     5,153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             5,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (897)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               (348)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (549)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (549)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (5.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (5.72)
<FN>                                                  
<F1> Includes timber and timberlands.                 
</FN>                                                 
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41770 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. KRISTI LYNN GRIFFITH Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-97-1 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kristi Lynn Griffith has moved for leave towithdrawand has filed a briefin accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Griffith has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
J. A01004/15 

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA 

v. :

:

JUAN MOYER, : No. 341 WDA 2014 

:

 Appellant :

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence, January 29, 2014, 

in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County 

Criminal Division at No. CP-02-CR-0008620-2009 

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., DONOHUE AND ALLEN, JJ. 

JUDGMENT ORDER BY FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.: FILED APRIL 20, 2015 

 Juan Moyer appeals from the judgment of sentence of January 29, 

2014, following revocation of his probation and parole. We affirm. 

 The sole issue presented concerns the discretionary aspects of 

appellant’s sentence. Appellant argues that the sentence of 2 to 4 years’ 

imprisonment following his probation revocation was manifestly excessive 

and an abuse of discretion as it was based on technical violations without 

taking into consideration all of the required statutory factors. (Appellant’s 

brief at 13.) “The right to appeal a discretionary aspect of sentence is not 

absolute.” Commonwealth v. Raven, 97 A.3d 1244, 1252 (Pa.Super. 

2014). We conclude that appellant has failed to preserve his sentencing 

claim. 
J. A01004/15 

- 2 - 

 Pa.R.A.P. 302(a) provides that “issues not raised in the lower court are 

waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.” Commonwealth 

v. Jarvis, 663 A.2d 790, 791 (Pa.Super. 1995). As such, issues challenging 

the discretionary aspects of sentencing must be raised in a post-sentence 

motion or by raising the claim during the sentencing proceedings. 

Pa.R.Crim.P. 720; Commonwealth v. Tejada, 2015 WL 62931 (Pa.Super. 

2015) (explaining that specific challenges to discretionary aspects of 

sentence are waived where raised for the first time in a Rule 1925(b) 

statement rather than at sentencing or in a post-sentence motion). Absent 

such efforts, an objection to a discretionary aspect of a sentence is waived. 

Id.

 Herein, appellant did not raise this specific reason during the 

sentencing hearing nor did he file a counseled post-sentence motion. As 

such, the sentencing judge did not have an opportunity to reconsider or 

modify his sentence on this basis; therefore, the claim is waived. See

Tejada, supra.

1

 Judgment of sentence affirmed. 

 

1

 While appellant filed a pro se motion for modification of sentence, such 

does not preserve a challenge to the discretionary aspects of his sentence. 

Appellant was represented by counsel; the record contains no motion to 

withdraw as counsel. See Commonwealth v. Spotz, 99 A.3d 866 (Pa. 

2014) (no right to hybrid representation; pro se briefs and motions filed by 

counseled defendant’s are not typically considered) Commonwealth v. 

Nischan, 928 A.2d 349, 355 (Pa.Super. 2007), appeal denied, 936 A.2d 40 

(Pa. 2007) (finding appellant had no right to file pro se post sentence 

motion where he was represented by counsel; pro se motion was a nullity). 

Nor were the issues raised in this brief presented in the pro se motion. 
J. A01004/15 

- 3 - 

Judgment Entered. 

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. 

Prothonotary 

Date: 4/20/2015
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Hearings of The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules 
of Appellate Procedure

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 77FR 49828.

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Appellate Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open Hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the 
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure has been canceled: Appellate Rules 
Hearing, February 1, 2013, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin J. Robinson, Deputy Rules 
Officer and Counsel, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: January 2, 2013.
Benjamin J. Robinson,
Rules Committee Deputy and Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-00233 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1526 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 200 Israel Road Southeast in Tumwater, 

Washington, as the ‘‘Eva G. Hewitt Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1526 RFS

1 SECTION 1. EVA G. HEWITT POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 200 Israel Road Southeast in 

4 Tumwater, Washington, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Eva G. Hewitt Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Eva G. Hewitt Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2016202EN.01011401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/114 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/114

---

Article 151

(ex Article 136 TEC)

(ex Article 136 TEC)

The Union and the Member States, having in mind fundamental social rights such as those set out in the European Social Charter signed at Turin on 18 October 1961 and in the 1989 Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers, shall have as their objectives the promotion of employment, improved living and working conditions, so as to make possible their harmonisation while the improvement is being maintained, proper social protection, dialogue between management and labour, the development of human resources with a view to lasting high employment and the combating of exclusion.

To this end the Union and the Member States shall implement measures which take account of the diverse forms of national practices, in particular in the field of contractual relations, and the need to maintain the competitiveness of the Union economy.

They believe that such a development will ensue not only from the functioning of the internal market, which will favour the harmonisation of social systems, but also from the procedures provided for in the Treaties and from the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action.

---
Lexter Kossie#700661 William McConnell Unit 

### 3001 South Emily Drive Beeville, Texas 78102 

### April 26, 2015
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 

### P.O. BOX 12308, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711
RE: WR NOs. 10,978-01 thru 10,978-16 Tr.Ct.NOs. 679887-A thru 679887-K 

### 185thDistrict Court - Harris County 

# to)<n&01)07,03,vV,Q®pu>~5


# RECBVEDIN COURTOCRIMINGAppvJLS W292015 

# ^Acesfe,Cferfc •

Dear Clerk: Recently Ihave been cited for abuse of the writ. In 

### order for me to showthat the claims I intend toraise, in my subsequent writ are not barred by Sec 4 I am requesting the docket sheet of all the writs mentioned above with a list of all of the claims presented in each of those application. With out a list of all of the claims I cannot show that the claims 

### I intend to raise have not been raised before in those prior applications. 

### Thank you for any consideration given in this matter. Sincerely,

cc:File 

# ^e^Z^'fl^J^t Lextetr- Kennon Kossie