alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Finlay Enterprises, Inc., (the "Company") does hereby certify with
respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
October 30, 2004 (the "Report") that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: December 9, 2004
                                               /s/ Bruce E. Zurlnick
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Bruce E. Zurlnick
                                               Senior Vice President, Treasurer
                                               and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
```
Order entered April 21, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01593-CR

JEFFREY LYNN ADAY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-1-0206

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s April 17, 2015 second motion for extension of time to 

file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief within TEN (10) DAYS from the date of this 

order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### Kenneth Earl SAYERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. 0-76-571.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 25, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 11, 1977.

*483Charles W. Stubbs, Stubbs, Stiner & Pace, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., Robert L. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., Michael Dar-rah, Legal Intern, for appellee.

OPINION

BLISS, Judge:

Appellant, Kenneth Earl Sayers, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was given a two (2) year suspended sentence on June 11, 1975, for Uttering a Forged Instrument. On June 22, 1975, he was arrested for Possession of Stolen Property, and subsequently the suspension of sentence for Uttering a Forged Instrument was revoked following a hearing on January 29, 1976, in accordance with 22 O.S.Supp.1974, § 991b. From that revocation defendant has perfected this appeal.

The sole witness at the revocation hearing was Danny Cochran of the Oklahoma City Police Department. He testified that on June 22, 1975, he was the victim of a burglary, and that one person, Mark Grubbs, was arrested. Grubbs told the police that there had been three persons involved in the burglary, and he named the other two as being Benny Southward and Marvin Maddox. After Southward was arrested, Officer Cochran took Grubbs with him in a police car and went to find Maddox. Grubbs supplied Officer Cochran with an address, and when they got there he directed Officer Cochran’s attention to a parked car. Officer Cochran approached the car and observed that one of the occupants was wearing a shirt taken in the burglary. He thereupon arrested all three occupants of the car, one of whom was the defendant. A search revealed that the defendant had the officer’s .22 pistol in his pocket.

The defendant’s three assignments of error all revolve around the admissibility of the pistol. He first contends that it was unconstitutionally obtained; that it was, therefore, inadmissible in the revocation hearing; and, finally that without the pistol there was no evidence of the violation alleged, and hence no ground for revocation. However, we find no merit in the defendant’s contentions. When the officer observed the third burglar wearing the officer’s shirt on the same day that the burglary had been committed, he was justified in arresting all three persons in the car, and having arrested them he had a clear right to search them. *United States v. Robinson,*414 U.S. 218, 94 S.Ct. 467, 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973). We therefore affirm the revocation of suspension.

BRETT, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1472 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1472

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 21, 2019

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To rename the Homestead National Monument of America near Beatrice, 
          Nebraska, as the Homestead National Historical Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HOMESTEAD NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    (a) In General.--The first section of the Act of March 19, 1936 (16 
U.S.C. 450u), is amended by striking ``designated'' and all that 
follows through the end and inserting ``designated the `Homestead 
National Historical Park'.''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the unit of the National 
Park System known as ``The Homestead National Monument of America'' 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Homestead National 
Historical Park''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
|Exhibit 23.1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Consent of Independent Public Accountants                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8 Registration Statements, File Numbers, 033-65256, 033-65254, 033-65890, 333-07735, 333-46791, 333-46795, 333-46797, and 333-46809 of our report dated July 28, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Butler National Corporation included in the Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2010.
/s/ Weaver & Martin, LLC
Kansas City, Missouri
July 28, 2010
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

C.   DECLARATIONS BY MEMBER STATES

DECLARATIONS BY MEMBER STATES

58.   Declaration by the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Hungary and the Republic of Malta on the spelling of the name of the single currency in the Treaties

Declaration by the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Hungary and the Republic of Malta on the spelling of the name of the single currency in the Treaties

Without prejudice to the unified spelling of the name of the single currency of the European Union referred to in the Treaties as displayed on the banknotes and on the coins, Latvia, Hungary and Malta declare that the spelling of the name of the single currency, including its derivatives as applied throughout the Latvian, Hungarian and Maltese text of the Treaties, has no effect on the existing rules of the Latvian, Hungarian or Maltese languages.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1445 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1445

    To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a final rule 
 relating to removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of 
   grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened 
                               wildlife.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2019

  Ms. Cheney (for herself and Mr. Gianforte) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a final rule 
 relating to removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of 
   grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened 
                               wildlife.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Grizzly Bear State Management Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULE RELATING TO GREATER YELLOWSTONE 
              ECOSYSTEM POPULATION OF GRIZZLY BEARS.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall reissue the final rule 
relating to removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of 
grizzly bears from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened 
Wildlife, published on June 30, 2017 (82 Fed. Reg. 30502), without 
regard to any other provision of statute or regulation that applies to 
issuance of such rule. Such reissuance (including this section) shall 
not be subject to judicial review.
                                 <all>
```
#### William Riley HUGHES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. M-77-125.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

June 4, 1979.

ORDER VACATING OPINION AND REVERSING AND REMANDING TO THE DISTRICT COURT

NOW, on this 31st day of May, 1979, the opinion entered on the 6th day of December, 1977 and reported at Okl.Cr. 572 P.2d 573 (1978), is VACATED in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, *Hughes v. Oklahoma,*- U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 1727, 60 L.Ed.2d 250;

AND, this cause is REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO DISMISS in accordance with *Hughes v. Oklahoma,*supra.

ÍT IS SO ORDERED.

WITNESS OUR HANDS and the Seal of this Court this 4th day of June, 1979.

TOM R. CORNISH, PRESIDING JUDGE

TOM BRETT, JUDGE

HEZ J. BUSSEY, JUDGE
MEMORANDUM

TO: Trista Etzig; Project Manager, Specialty Crop Block Grant Program

FROM: Tom Jones; Manager, Marketing and Development Branch

DATE: May 5, 2015

RE: Request for Special Purpose Equipment for AMS Agreement 12-25-B-XXXX

The XXX State Department of Agriculture (the Department) would like to amend the project 

entitled Developing RNA Vaccines to Manage Pepino Mosaic Virus in AMS Agreement 12-

25-B-XXXX to purchase additional equipment. Please see the detail below that describes the 

reason and extent of the changes to the project:

JUSTIFICATION:

After the starting the research project, we observed that there was a greater need for the 96-

well thermocycler. The 96-well thermocycler that was purchased with grant funds cannot 

keep up with the demand for the completion of all the project activities. Consequently, we 

would like to divert $5,000 from personnel and fringe benefits (Senior Research Specialist) 

to equipment to keep up with the demands of this project. The lower personnel expense 

will not affect our ability to complete the tasks of this research. XYZ State University will 

provide a greater amount of in-kind contribution of its researchers’ time.

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION & PRICING INFORMATION:

The additional 96-well thermocylcer will be used to accommodate the large numbers of 

PCR-related experiments outlined in the project. This equipment will only be used for the 

project entitled Developing RNA Vaccines to Manage Pepino Mosaic Virus. The cost of 

this item will be an additional $5,000, which, as stated earlier, will be diverted from the 

personnel and fringe benefit cost categories.

If you have any questions concerning this requested amendment, please feel free to contact 

me. If necessary, I will be more than happy to discuss and ratify this request to ensure that it 

meets the requirements of the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program.

Sincerely,

XXX State Department of Agriculture

Division of Agriculture

Phone: (555) 222-2222

Email: DivisionofAg@XXX.gov
X

Tom Jones

Manager
Livestock, Poultry, and 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Grain Market News Room 2619-S, STOP 0252

Division Washington, DC 20250-0249

Use of Automated Data Access

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) offers customers several options to 

automatically download large amounts of Market News data published in market reports. 

Through our Web Service, customers can access Livestock Mandatory Reporting data published 

on our DataMart platform. Customers can also access some datasets with the Application 

Programming Interface (API) feature on our My Market News platform. 

While this technology improves data accessibility, certain issues arise. Mainly, an overuse of the 

systems given the vast amount of customers who frequently download Market News data. 

Recently, our systems have received data queries from single IP addresses in excess of 1,000

times each day while market reports publish at most twice daily. Often these high frequency 

requests occur due to simple coding errors. 

Overloading these systems with frequent automated requests unnecessarily taxes computing 

resources. These constant requests consume all the network bandwidth, create website 

performance issues often causing the website to crash, and reduce data availability to other 

customers attempting to reach the site. 

To mitigate overloading the systems, AMS will temporarily block IP addresses found taxing the 

systems with high frequency requests. If you find DataMart or the API unavailable, or notice 

performance issues on your Web Service queries, it is possible your IP address has been blocked. 

Please email Wash.LPGMN@ams.usda.gov for assistance restoring your access. 

We ask that all of our customers use these systems judiciously to ensure everyone has 

uninterrupted access to Market News datasets and reports. To learn more about Web Service, 

visit: https://mpr.ams.usda.gov/mpr/webServiceGuide.pdf. To learn more about My Market 

News, visit: https://mymarketnews.ams.usda.gov/.
-79.5 -79.0 -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5

38.0 38.5 39.0 39.5 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/29 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of MFC Industrial Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Samuel Morrow, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 
|  | (i) | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | Date: | March 31, 2015 |
|--|-------|----------------|

*/s/ Samuel Morrow            *By: Samuel MorrowTitle: Chief Financial Officer

*This certification accompanies this Annual Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and**shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of**the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be**incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except**to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.*
EXHIBIT 23.4
                                                                   ------------




March 29, 2007



NEXEN INC.
801 7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta  T2P 3P7


We hereby consent to references to our firm relating to the  evaluation  and/or
audit of certain oil and gas properties of Nexen Inc. (the "Company") contained
in the  section  entitled  "Basis  of  Reserves  Estimates"  within  "Reserves,
Production  and Related  Information"  as set out in Part I, Items 1&2 Business
and  Properties of the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K/A  Amendment No. 1
for the year ended December 31, 2005.


Sincerely,

MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.


/s/ P. A. Welch
---------------------
P. A. Welch, P. Eng.
President & Managing Director
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Paul Genova, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

| |                          | 
| | ------------------------ | 
| | /s/ Paul Genova          | 
| |                          | 
| | Paul Genova             
| | Chief Executive
 Officer
| | November 15, 2010       

The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David G. Miller, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following Memorandum: In the exercise of our discretion, we modify the sentence imposed upon defendant to time served. The sentence thus equates with the term of imprisonment recommended in the pre-sentence report. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Driving While Intoxicated.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
#### *The*People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hector Santiago, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Vincent Vitale, J.), rendered July 8, 1987, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Complainant was robbed of her gold neck chain by the defendant, a person she had previously seen in the neighborhood. Approximately two and one-half months later, complainant saw the defendant, who was wearing the same coat and sneakers as he had when he committed the robbery, in a local supermarket located two blocks from the place where the robbery occurred. Defendant, once arrested, stated to the complainant, "I’m going to kill you when I get out”.

Defendant claims he was denied a fair trial when the prosecutor, in summation, allegedly mischaracterized the defense by arguing that defendant’s own testimony precluded a mistaken identification claim; argued facts not in evidence; and improperly characterized defendant as a welfare fraud. These claims are unpreserved insofar as defendant, at trial, *521voiced only a single general objection to one of the comments now challenged. In any event, we find the prosecutor’s remarks to have been entirely proper. Concur—-Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
# L_2012112EN.01006701.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ANNEX V

List referred to in Article 18 of the Act of Accession: transitional measures

List referred to in Article 18 of the Act of Accession: transitional measures

9.   FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

32006 R 0562: Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p. 1).

The following Article is inserted:

‘Article 19a

By way of derogation from the provisions of this Regulation relating to the establishment of border crossing points, and until the entry into force of a decision by the Council on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Croatia pursuant to Article 4(2) of the Act of Accession or until this Regulation is amended to include provisions governing border control at common border crossing points, whichever is the earlier, Croatia may maintain the common border crossing points at its border with Bosnia and Herzegovina. At these common border crossing points, border guards of one party shall carry out entry and exit checks on the territory of the other party. All entry and exit checks by Croatian border guards shall be carried out in compliance with the acquis of the Union, including Member States’ obligations as regards international protection and non-refoulement. The relevant bilateral agreements establishing the common border crossing points in question shall, if necessary, be amended to that end.’.

---