alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GEORGE E. McCREA 

District Attorney – 119th Judicial District 

124 W. Beauregard 

San Angelo, Texas 76903 

325/659-6583 325/655-6116 

325/658-6831 (Fax) 

 

April 20, 2015 

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk 

Third Court of Appeals 

P.O. Box 12547 

Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas 78711 

Style: George Henry Walker v. The State of Texas—Case # 03-14-00789-CR, 

Trial Court # B-13-0883-SB; Case # 03-14-00790-CR, Trial Court # B-14-0650-

SA; Case # 03-14-00791-CR, Trial Court # B-14-0994-SB, 119th District Court 

Dear Mr. Kyle: 

The State believes that the trial court ruled correctly in this case. With 

regard to the Anders brief filed by Appellant, the State hereby notifies the Court 

that it will not respond on the merits to the points raised and conceded by 

Appellant’s brief. Please file this letter response with the papers in the cause and 

bring it to the attention of the appropriate members of the Court or its staff. 

Sincerely, 

____________________________ 

J. Bryan Clayton 

Asst. District Attorney 

 119th Judicial District 

 124 W Beauregard, Ste. B 

 San Angelo, TX 76903 

 (325) 659-6583 

 (325) 658-6831 FAX 

 State Bar No. 04338625 

cc: Erica Copeland 

P. O. Box 399 

Cedar Park, TX 78613 

ecopeland63@yahoo.com via https://efile.txcourts.gov/

ACCEPTED

03-14-00791-CR

4952642

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/20/2015 1:31:33 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/20/2015 1:31:33 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
\552-lf

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 05-13-00121-CR OFFENSE: 22.04

Tina Marie Alberson v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Dallas

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 363rd Judicial District Court

DATE: 11/6/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-11-59105-W

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Tina Marie Alberson v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

fftO $£ Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: 03hiLwir

JUDGE: fj\ /jAAS4*~-

CCA#: 1SS2-/V

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
<Page>
                                                              Exhibit 10.10(a)

"Pages where confidential treatment has been requested are marked 'Confidential
Treatment Requested.' The redacted material has been separately filed with the
Commission, and the appropriate section has been marked at the appropriate
place and in the margin with a star (*)."


                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                     NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS PURCHASE AGREEMENT

     This Amendment is executed this 14th day of September, 1998, to be
effective as of the Effective Date provided herein, by and between CHEVRON
U.S.A. INC. ("Chevron") and DYNEGY MIDSTREAM SERVICES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
("Dynegy").

     WHEREAS, Chevron and Dynegy (formerly known as Warren Petroleum Company,
Limited Partnership) entered into that certain Natural Gas Liquids Purchase
Agreement, effective as of September 1, 1996 (the "Purchase Agreement"), as
amended, under which Chevron agreed to sell to Dynegy, and Dynegy agreed to
purchase from Chevron, all of Chevron's right, title and interest in (i) the Raw
NGL Mix produced at the Venice Processing Plant that is not fractionated at the
Venice Fractionator, and (ii) the Fractionated NGLs produced at the Venice
Fractionator; and

     WHEREAS, Chevron and Dynegy now wish to amend the Purchase Agreement as
further set forth herein;

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other valuable
consideration, Chevron and Dynegy agree as follows:

     1.   Exhibit "F" to the Purchase Agreement is deleted in its entirety and
replaced by the revised Exhibit "F" attached hereto.

     2.   This Amendment is effective on and after September 1, 1998 (the
"Effective Date").

     3.   All other provisions of the Purchase Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Chevron and Dynegy have each caused their duly
authorized representative to execute this Amendment.

DYNEGY MIDSTREAM SERVICES,                   CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

By:  Dynegy Midstream G. P., Inc.,           By:   /s/ Larry D. Robison
     its General Partner                           --------------------
                                             Title: Manager, Midstream
                                                   --------------------
By:  /s/ Vincent T. McConnell
     -------------------------
     Vincent T. McConnell
     Senior Vice President


                                        1
<PAGE>

                     "Confidential Treatment Requested"



*                                    [REDACTED]
NUMBER 13-15-00136-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

EX PARTE ROSA MARIA CRUCES

On appeal from the 197th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

O R D E R

Before Justices Valdez, Rodriguez, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Ex Parte Rosa Maria Cruces, has filed a notice of appeal with this 

Court from his conviction in trial court cause number 2010-CR-2257-C. The trial court’s 

certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have 

the right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a 

defendant has a right of appeal is not made a part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4.
2

Within thirty days of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Pablo Rocha, 

is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether appellant has a 

right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether 

appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of any 

amended certification. 

If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is 

further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of this notice, 

identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4; see also, e.g., Carroll v. State, No. 04-03-00473-CR, 2003 

Tex. App. LEXIS 7317 (San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (designated for publication) 

(certification form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified to reflect that 

defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not addressed by the form). The 

motion must include an analysis of the applicable case law, and any factual allegations 

therein must be true and supported by the record. Cf. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 

316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that 

recitations in the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of 

record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting 

appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1,

10.2.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 

15th day of April 2015.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth Stastny, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2007



By:

/s/ Kenneth StastnyKenneth StastnyChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certifies that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Donna
Brandin
 
 Donna
Brandin


Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)


November
16, 2009
**Exhibit 23.4**

** **
|       |                   | **Principals**       | ** ** |
|------------|------------------------|----------------------|------------|
| ** ** |                   |                 |
|       | P. A. Welch P. Eng.    | G. M. Heath P. Eng.  |
|       | B. H. Emslie P. Eng.   | R. F. Ott P. Geol.   |
|       | C. B. Kowalski P. Eng. | B. J. Wurster P.Eng. |

 

 

February 15, 2007

 

 

We hereby consent to references to our firm relating to theevaluation and or audit of certain oil and gas properties of Nexen Inc. (the “Company”)contained in the section entitled “Oil and Gas Accounting – ReservesDetermination” within “Critical Accounting Estimates” as set out in Part II,Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December31, 2006.

 
| Sincerely,                                     |
|------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |
| **McDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.** |
| ** **                                     |
| ** **                                     |
| /s/ P. A. Welch                                |   |
| P. A. Welch, P. Eng.                           |
| President & Managing Director              |

 

2200, Bow Valley Square 3, 255 – 5 AvenueSW, Calgary AB T2P 3G6   Tel: (403) 262-5506  Fax: (403) 233-2744  www.mcdan.com

 

----
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-703 Rev. 1, 11/2013



### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 5/21/2014 Sample Number: 141727-001 Date Collected:05/13/2014 09:05 Date Received:5/13/2014 

### WWTP Inlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 101000 10000 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 4000 05/19/2014 

### Sample Number: 141727-002 Date Collected:05/13/2014 09:00 Date Received:5/13/2014 

### Primary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 1050 50 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 20 05/19/2014 

### Sample Number: 141727-003 Date Collected:05/13/2014 09:01 Date Received:5/13/2014 

### Primary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 619 50 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 20 05/19/2014 

### Sample Number: 141727-004 Date Collected:05/13/2014 08:46 Date Received:5/13/2014 

### Secondary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 115 20 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 8 05/19/2014 

### Sample Number: 141727-005 Date Collected:05/13/2014 08:48 Date Received:5/13/2014 

## Secondary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 164 20 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 8 05/19/2014 

### Sample Number: 141727-006 Date Collected:05/13/2014 08:50 Date Received:5/13/2014 

### WWTP Outlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 143 20 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 8 05/19/2014 

### Sample Number: 141727-007 Date Collected:05/13/2014 08:26 Date Received:5/13/2014 

## FGD Landfill Discharge to Pond Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 134 20 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 8 05/19/2014 Amos Plant, 141727 Page 1 of 2

### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 5/21/2014 Sample Number: 141727-008 Date Collected:05/13/2014 08:26 Date Received:5/13/2014 

### Recirculation Pond Outlet at Weir Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 1.9 1 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 0.4 05/19/2014 

### Sample Number: 141727-009 Date Collected:05/13/2014 08:30 Date Received:5/13/2014 

### Clearwater Pond at Weir Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 10.5 2 TLT EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 05/19/2014

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Amos Plant, 141727 Page 2 of 2
# C_2016202EN.01015201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/152 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/152

---

Article 232

(ex Article 199 TEC)

(ex Article 199 TEC)

The European Parliament shall adopt its Rules of Procedure, acting by a majority of its Members.

The proceedings of the European Parliament shall be published in the manner laid down in the Treaties and in its Rules of Procedure.

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 08-2440

WEAVER'S COVE ENERGY, LLC,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

RHODE ISLAND COASTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT COUNCIL; MICHAEL M.

TIKOIAN, in his capacity as Chairman of the Rhode Island Coastal

Resources Management Council; PAUL E. LEMONT, in his capacity as

Vice Chairman of the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management

Council; THOMAS RICCI; DAVID ABEDON; DONALD GOMEZ; K. JOSEPH

SHEKARCHI; NEIL GRAY; W. MICHAEL SULLIVAN; RAYMOND C. COIA;

GERALD P. ZARRELLA; BRUCE DAWSON; in their capacities as Members

of the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council,

Defendants, Appellants.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on October 26, 2009, is

amended as follows:

On page 4, line 13, delete the word "to" in the phrase

"under the to NGA."
# C_2016202EN.01019301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/193 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/193

---

Article 339

(ex Article 287 TEC)

(ex Article 287 TEC)

The members of the institutions of the Union, the members of committees, and the officials and other servants of the Union shall be required, even after their duties have ceased, not to disclose information of the kind covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, in particular information about undertakings, their business relations or their cost components.

---
CCA # 07-10-00242-CR

Chrystopher Don Preciado v. The State

STYLE: of Texas

TRIAL COURT:

TRIAL COURT #:

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Honorable Dan L Schaap

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED

47th District Court

60,196-A

1413-14-

OFFENSE: Aggravated Robbery

PUNISHMENT: 40 yrs, TDCJ $1000 fine

COUNTY: Potter

FOR REHEARING IS:

DATE:

JUDGE:

MOTION

DATE: July 13, 2011

JUSTICE: Justice Hancock

PUBLISH: YES

PC S YES

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APPBR:

DNP:

July 19, 2010

September 27, 2010

March 4, 2011

December 20, 2010

SUPP CLK RECORD:

SUPP RPT RECORD:

SUPP BR:

PROSE BR:

November 17, 2010

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

PRO S£ Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: 03hk

JU

MIT

DGE: /^t bu*u^~-

CCA IS:.

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

ON

CCA#

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

ON

JUDGE:

Vol. I of I
Exhibit 31(iv)

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, John E. Kirksey, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Camco Financial Corporation; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: April 27, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ John E. Kirksey          
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | John E. Kirksey              
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.11

                    Schedule to Form of Management Agreement
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                 <C>                    <C>                  <C>                <C>
Project             Management             Management Firm       Community Name     Property
                    Firm
Lebanon, PA         Balanced Care          Financial Care       Outlook Pointe at  Lebanon  County,
                    at Lebanon,            Investors of         Lebanon,           Pennsylvania
                    Inc.                   Lebanon, LLC

Loyalsock, PA       Balanced Care at       Financial Care       Outlook Pointe at  Lycoming County,
                    Loyalsock,             Investors of         Loyalsock          Pennsylvania
                    Inc.                   Loyalsock, LLC

Sagamore Hills, OH  Balanced Care          Financial Care       Outlook Pointe at  Summit County,
                    at Sagamore            Investors of         Sagamore Hills     Ohio
                    Hills, Inc.            Sagamore Hills, LLC
</TABLE>
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

No. 04-15-00171-CR

Dominique Martez REED,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR0009

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which appellant pleaded 

guilty to the offense of murder. Under the plea agreement, the State agreed to withdraw Count I 

of the indictment — capital murder — and proceed only on Count II — murder — thereby 

effectively agreeing to limit the possible sentence and rendering the agreement as one relating to 

punishment for purposes of Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Shankle v. 

State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a). 

The trial court imposed sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a 

certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); see also Shankle, 119 S.W.3d at 813. Appellant timely filed a notice 

of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a 

written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). This court must 

dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been 

made part of the record.” Id.

The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the 

punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2); see also Shankle, 119 S.W.3d at 813. The record also appears to support the trial 

court’s certification that appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 

S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record 

to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate); see also Shankle, 119 S.W.3d at 813. 
Appellant is hereby given notice that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to rule 

25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended certification showing that 

appellant has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record by May 21, 2015. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, 

order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not 

designated for publication).

We order all appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of the court. We 

further order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and 

the court reporter. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00132

- CV
Gaetan Pelletier and Pelletier Management and Consulting, LLC v. Victoria Air Conditioning, Ltd.
On Appeal from the 267th District Court of De Witt County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 16

- 09

- 23,901

JUDG MENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further o r der this decision certified below for observance. June 24, 2021
# C_2016202EN.01005201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/52

---

Article 6

The Union shall have competence to carry out actions to support, coordinate or supplement the actions of the Member States. The areas of such action shall, at European level, be:

| (a) | protection and improvement of human health; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

protection and improvement of human health;

| (b) | industry; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

industry;

| (c) | culture; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

culture;

| (d) | tourism; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

tourism;

| (e) | education, vocational training, youth and sport; |
| --- | --- |

(e)

education, vocational training, youth and sport;

| (f) | civil protection; |
| --- | --- |

(f)

civil protection;

| (g) | administrative cooperation. |
| --- | --- |

(g)

administrative cooperation.

---