alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000879235
<NAME> AUTOCAM CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,334,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,911,443
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,875,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,638,635
<PP&E>                                      91,945,595
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,156,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             117,369,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,866,031
<BONDS>                                     46,752,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    31,874,699
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,050,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               117,369,227
<SALES>                                     24,019,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,019,951
<CGS>                                       20,579,418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,579,418
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             790,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                703,964
<INCOME-TAX>                                   526,284
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            177,680
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   177,680
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
July 20, 2007

27643

#### Annan-Yartey v. Nomura

Affirmed
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM                        .                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 24, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service ® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 17, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 108 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-53, CP2024-54.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-25890 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Stormy L. Dean, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of infoUSA Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. [Intentionally omitted]; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      Date: February 21, 2006    /s/ *Stormy L. Dean*   Stormy L. Dean  Chief Financial Officer
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000315

12-OCT-2016

08:35 AM
NUMBER 13-07-00685-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

DAN UZZELL, TRUSTEE, Appellant,

v.

JASPER T. ROE, IRREVOCABLE TRUST, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 404th District Court 

of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on March 12, 2008. On June 3,

2008, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and

that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this
2

letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly

injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, appellant has neither filed

his brief in this matter nor otherwise responded to the Court’s notices.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered 

and filed this the 21st day of August, 2008.
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-15-00100-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.Z.L., S.E.L., A.S.L. AKA A.L., AND Z.E.N.B.L. AKA Z.L., 

CHILDREN

Appeal from the 309th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011-18283).

After inspecting the record of the court below, the Court holds that it lacks 

jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, the Court dismisses the appeal.

The Court orders that the appellant, K.E.S.-L., pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered April 21, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Jennings, Higley, and 

Huddle.
# C_2016202EN.01003601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/36

---

Article 39

In accordance with Article 16 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and by way of derogation from paragraph 2 thereof, the Council shall adopt a decision laying down the rules relating to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Member States when carrying out activities which fall within the scope of this Chapter, and the rules relating to the free movement of such data. Compliance with these rules shall be subject to the control of independent authorities.

---
# C_2016203EN.01004201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/42

---

Article 157

Save as otherwise provided in this Treaty, actions brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union shall not have suspensory effect. The Court of Justice of the European Union may, however, if it considers that circumstances so require, order that application of the contested act be suspended.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Frank, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence, including the police chemist’s opinion that the substance seized was cocaine, was legally sufficient to support defendant’s convictions *(see, People v Harris,*130 AD2d 939, 940, *lv denied*70 NY2d 647). The trial court properly permitted unindicted coconspirator DiGregorio to testify about defendant’s threat against him because it was probative of defendant’s consciousness of guilt *(see, People v Reyes,*162 AD2d 357, *lv denied*76 NY2d 896; *People v Whaley,*144 AD2d 510, *lv denied*73 NY2d 897). Defendant’s contention that the court erred in its no inference charge *(see,*CPL 300.10 [2]) was not preserved for review and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice because the charge given did not expressly convey to the jury that defendant should have testified *(see, People v Autry,*75 NY2d 836, 839; *People v Collins,*170 AD2d 1006). We have considered the remaining contentions raised by counsel and defendant *pro se*and find them lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 1st Degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 939 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 939

    To require the Secretary of Education to use the excess revenue 
generated from the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program to carry 
                  out the Federal Pell Grant Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2015

   Mr. Kind introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Secretary of Education to use the excess revenue 
generated from the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program to carry 
                  out the Federal Pell Grant Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pell Grant Funding Act''.

SEC. 2. APPLYING EXCESS REVENUE TO FEDERAL PELL GRANTS.

    The Secretary of Education shall--
            (1) as soon as practicable after the end of a fiscal year, 
        determine whether during such fiscal year the William D. Ford 
        Federal Direct Loan Program under part D of title IV of the 
        Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.) 
        generated any revenue in excess of the amount that was 
        necessary to cover the costs of carrying out such Program for 
        such fiscal year; and
            (2) if such excess revenue was generated, use such excess 
        revenue to carry out the Federal Pell Grant Program under 
        subpart 1 of part A of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 
        1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a) for the succeeding fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6860

JAMES ALVIN BOULWARE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE V. LAUGHRUN, II, Private Attorney; ZORO

J. GUICE, JR.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-171-MU)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 25, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Alvin Boulware, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Alvin Boulware appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his complaint brought under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2002) and 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) (1994). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Boulware v. Laughrun, No. CA-02-171-MU (W.D.N.C. filed

May 15, 2002; entered Mary 16, 2002). We deny Boulware’s motion

for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00920-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.R.F., a Child

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-01502

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order of Termination 

is AFFIRMED.

No costs of appeal are assessed because appellant is indigent.

SIGNED April 15, 2015.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification:
 
 I, Gary D. Engle, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AFG Investment Trust C;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which     such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 5.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 6.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 
 /s/ Gary D. Engle
 Gary D. Engle
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 August 13, 2004
Exhibit 99.1

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.**

**SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of AutoImmune Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, as of the date of this statement, theCompany’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the three period ended March 31, 2003. 

 

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section906 of the Sabarnes-Oxley Act of 2002. This statement is not “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Act or any other federal or state law or regulation.

 

Date: May 15, 2003 

By: /s/    Robert C.Bishop                  

Name: Robert C. Bishop 

Title: Chief Executive Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

VATESHEA ANORA CURE

, Appellant,

v.

LAGO FUNDING CORP.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 3555

[ November 17, 2022 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Robert W. Lee , Judge; L.T. Case No. COCE21

- 050755

.

Vateshea Anora Cure, Pembroke Pines, pro se.

Amanda C. Rolfe of Rolfe & Lobello, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, L EVINE and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,267                  14,512
<SECURITIES>                                    36,175                  38,933
<RECEIVABLES>                                  240,249                 257,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (6,088)                (11,209)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,067                  17,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               280,693                 317,704
<PP&E>                                         248,802                 271,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (54,648)                (64,387)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 605,423                 748,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,885                 117,135
<BONDS>                                        322,915                 382,242
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       124,798                 123,378
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,278                  90,922
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   605,423                 748,039
<SALES>                                        224,516                 230,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,516                 230,011
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,854                 205,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,588                  14,307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,451                   1,519
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,537                   8,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (21,926)                 10,629
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (620)                  4,039
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (21,306)                  6,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,831                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26,137)                  6,590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.10)                   0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.10)                   0.28
        

</TABLE>