alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01018001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/180 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/180

---

Article 309

(ex Article 267 TEC)

(ex Article 267 TEC)

The task of the European Investment Bank shall be to contribute, by having recourse to the capital market and utilising its own resources, to the balanced and steady development of the internal market in the interest of the Union. For this purpose the Bank shall, operating on a non-profit-making basis, grant loans and give guarantees which facilitate the financing of the following projects in all sectors of the economy:

| (a) | projects for developing less-developed regions; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

projects for developing less-developed regions;

| (b) | projects for modernising or converting undertakings or for developing fresh activities called for by the establishment or functioning of the internal market, where these projects are of such a size or nature that they cannot be entirely financed by the various means available in the individual Member States; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

projects for modernising or converting undertakings or for developing fresh activities called for by the establishment or functioning of the internal market, where these projects are of such a size or nature that they cannot be entirely financed by the various means available in the individual Member States;

| (c) | projects of common interest to several Member States which are of such a size or nature that they cannot be entirely financed by the various means available in the individual Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

projects of common interest to several Member States which are of such a size or nature that they cannot be entirely financed by the various means available in the individual Member States.

In carrying out its task, the Bank shall facilitate the financing of investment programmes in conjunction with assistance from the Structural Funds and other Union Financial Instruments.

---
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                          Supplemental Agreement No 6
             to Contract No RU/10325105/30197 dated April 25, 1997
                                       and
                 to Assignment Agreement dated January 23, 2002

Boston, Massachusetts                                              April 17 2002

This Supplemental Agreement No 6 is made between company Pioglobal Forest
L.L.C. (hereinafter referred to as "Company"), corporation Pioneer Forest, Inc.
(hereinafter referred to as "PFI") and closed joint-stock company Forest-Starma
(hereinafter referred to as "Forest-Starma"). The Company, PFI and Forest-Starma
are hereinafter jointly referred to as "Parties" and each of them is hereafter
separately referred to as "Party"

1. Item 4.1 of Contract No RU/10325105/30197 dated April 25, 1997, must be
rephrased as follows:
"4.1. The Buyer shall make payments for each batch of Goods in USD not later
than 30 days after receipt of the invoice and in any case not later than 4 years
after the Goods have been cleared of the customs formalities on the territory of
the Russian Federation. The invoice must be submitted by the Seller to the Buyer
after the Goods have been cleared of the customs formalities on the territory of
the Russian Federation. The payments must be made by wire-transfer from the bank
account of the Buyer to the bank account of the non-resident which is a Party to
the present Contract.

2. In the Assignment Agreement dated January 23, 2002, the execution date of
Supplemental Agreement No 5 to Contract No RU/10325105/30197 shall be changed
to read "June 20, 2001" (instead of "July 20, 2001").

Pioglobal Forest, L.L.C.                          CJSC "Forest-Starma"

 /s/ Donald H. Hunter                              /s/ David Daggett
-----------------------------                     ------------------------
Donald Hunter                                     David Daggett
Vice-President                                    General Director

                                                   /s/ Valery Limarenko
                                                  ------------------------
Pioneer Forest, Inc.                              Valery Limarenko
                                                  First Deputy General Director

 /s/ Stephen Kasnet
-----------------------------
Stephen Kasnet                                     /s/ Nadezhda Obukhova
                                                  ------------------------
President                                         Nadezhda Obukhova
                                                  Deputy Chief Accountant
Order filed December 5, 2013

In The 

### Court of Appeals

For The 

### First District of Texas

___________ NO. 01

- 12

- 00064

- CR

____________ SCOTT FANCHER , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Crim Ct at Law No 6

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1745796



### ORDER
This court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit No. 1 (a photograph ).The Harris County District Clerk is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this

court the o riginal of State’s Exhibit No. 1 (a photograph ), on or before December 11 , 2013. This case is set for submission on December 11, 2013. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and k eep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State ’ s Exhibit No. 1 (a photograph ), to the clerk of the Harris County District Clerk

.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1569 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 105
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1569

                          [Report No. 116-142]

To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff and Yuma to the 
list of locations in which court shall be held in the judicial district 
                       for the State of Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2019

Mr. O'Halleran (for himself, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Gosar, 
Mr. Biggs, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Gallego, and Mrs. Lesko) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                              July 9, 2019

                    Additional sponsor: Mr. Stanton

                              July 9, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff and Yuma to the 
list of locations in which court shall be held in the judicial district 
                       for the State of Arizona.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT COURTS IN THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT FOR THE STATE OF 
              ARIZONA.

    Section 82 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, and Tucson'' and inserting ``Flagstaff, 
Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson, and Yuma''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 105

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1569

                          [Report No. 116-142]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff and Yuma to the 
list of locations in which court shall be held in the judicial district 
                       for the State of Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              July 9, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
# C_2016202EN.01039701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/397 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/397

---

Article 19

Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition

1.   Collective expulsions are prohibited.

2.   No one may be removed, expelled or extradited to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to the death penalty, torture or other inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the annual report of Cascade Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/ROBERT C. WARREN, JR.Robert C. Warren, Jr. Chief Executive OfficerApril 7, 2008 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/RICHARD S. ANDERSONRichard S. Anderson Chief Financial OfficerApril 7, 2008     |  | 

---



QuickLinks
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1483 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the foreign 

insurer excise tax certain insurance policies issued by United States 

territory and possession insurers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2019 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico (for herself, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Mr. 

KING of New York, Mr. FITZPATRICK, and Mr. SOTO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

from the foreign insurer excise tax certain insurance 

policies issued by United States territory and possession 

insurers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Puerto Rico Insurance 

5 Excise Tax Exemption Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1483 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTAIN INSURANCE POLICIES ISSUED BY UNITED 

2 STATES TERRITORY AND POSSESSION INSUR3 ERS EXEMPT FROM FOREIGN INSURER EX4 CISE TAX. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4373 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(3) TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS.—Any 

9 policy of insurance, indemnity bond, annuity con10 tract, or policy of reinsurance issued by a partner11 ship or corporation created or organized under the 

12 laws of any territory or possession of the United 

13 States, unless any of the hazards, risks, losses, or li14 abilities covered thereby are covered by a policy of 

15 reinsurance issued by a foreign insurer or reinsurer 

16 (other than such a partnership or corporation).’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to premiums paid after the date 

19 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00085-CR

Ricardo O. MORENO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 13, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 135229

Honorable Monica A. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2015

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

In November 2013, Appellant Ricardo O. Moreno was convicted in San Antonio Municipal 

Court No. 3 of violation of a municipal ordinance. He appealed his conviction to Bexar County 

Court at Law No. 13. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 30.00014 (West Supp. 2014) (appeal from 

municipal court). On November 18, 2014, the county court dismissed the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. On December 16, 2014, Appellant filed a motion for new trial, and on February 13, 

2015, Appellant filed a notice of appeal. 
04-15-00085-CR

To perfect an appeal, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of the date that the 

county court entered an appealable order. See id. § 30.00027 (authorizing appeal from a county 

court to a court of appeals under certain conditions); TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1) (setting deadline 

to file a notice of appeal for criminal appeals); Swain v. State, 319 S.W.3d 878, 879 (Tex. App.—

Fort Worth 2010, no pet.) (per curiam). A motion for new trial filed after an appeal from a 

municipal court of record to a county court does not extend the deadline to file the notice of appeal. 

Swain, 319 S.W.3d at 880. “If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, the court of appeals has no 

option but to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.” Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2012). 

On March 11, 2015, we ordered Appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should 

not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant timely responded, argued that the county court 

should not have dismissed his appeal, but did not address how this court has jurisdiction over his 

appeal from the county court’s order. 

The county court dismissed Appellant’s appeal on November 18, 2014; Appellant’s notice 

of appeal was due on December 18, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1); Swain, 319 S.W.3d at 

879. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due on January 2, 

2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). 

Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until February 13, 2015. Appellant did not invoke this 

court’s jurisdiction, and we may not consider his appeal. See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522.

We reinstate the appellate deadlines and dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1); Castillo, 369 S.W.3d at 198; Swain, 319 S.W.3d at 879–80.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association
Members/State Street Collective Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James S. Phalen, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 applicable to it; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                                    /s/ James S. Phalen
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    James S. Phalen
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    August 14, 2002
Order entered April 20, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00484-CV

IN RE STEPHEN C. SCANLON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-10-04599

ORDER

Before Justices Francis, Myers and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. 

Although we have reviewed relator’s mandamus record and all supporting appendices in 

determining this petition for writ of mandamus, because the mandamus record and supporting 

appendices 1, 2, 3, and 6 include unredacted information that identifies the relator’s minor 

children, we STRIKE relator’s mandamus record and supporting appendices 1, 2, 3, and 6. TEX.

R. APP. P. 9.9(b). We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Edward L. 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 16, 2015

No. 04-14-00483-CV

Rowland MARTIN, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

Edward L. BRAVENEC and 1216 West Ave., Inc.,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-07644

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On January 12, 2015, appellant filed his amended brief in this appeal. The appellee’s 

brief was filed on March 2, 2015, and the appellant’s amended reply brief was filed on April 6, 

2015.

In addition to the foregoing briefs, appellant has filed numerous documents with this 

court alluding to amendments to the briefs, requests for this court to take judicial notice, etc. 

Specifically, this courts notes the following filings: (1) Appellant’s Advisory to the Court and 

Notice of Amendments to Appellant’s Opening Brief filed January 30, 2015; (2) Appellant’s 

Advisory of Fraud on the Court, Further Notice of Breifing [sic] Amendment, and Second 

Supplemental Appendix filed February 19, 2015; and (3) Appellant’s Motion for Judicial Notice, 

Special Exceptions, and Partial Non-Suit with Prejudice Pursuant to the Texas Citizen’s 

Participation Act filed March 13, 2015. Although several of these documents allude to 

amendments to briefs, appellant did not seek leave of this court to file any such amendments. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.7 (providing briefs may be amended on whatever terms the court may 

prescribe). It is therefore ORDERED that this court will not consider any arguments made in the 

foregoing filings in resolving this appeal, but will consider only the arguments that are properly 

briefed in the appellant’s amended brief and amended reply brief and are in compliance with this 

court’s order dated December 8, 2014, setting forth the trial court’s orders that would be 

considered in this appeal.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal is set for formal submission ON BRIEFS 

ONLY on May 7th, 2015, before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, 
Justice Marialyn Barnard, and Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa. This court will not entertain any 

further motions or filings seeking to amend or expand the parties’ briefs.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants second fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Stephen L. ClantonStephen L. ClantonChief Financial Officer
# C_2016202EN.01002601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/26

---

Article 18

1.   The European Council, acting by a qualified majority, with the agreement of the President of the Commission, shall appoint the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. The European Council may end his term of office by the same procedure.

2.   The High Representative shall conduct the Union's common foreign and security policy. He shall contribute by his proposals to the development of that policy, which he shall carry out as mandated by the Council. The same shall apply to the common security and defence policy.

3.   The High Representative shall preside over the Foreign Affairs Council.

4.   The High Representative shall be one of the Vice-Presidents of the Commission. He shall ensure the consistency of the Union's external action. He shall be responsible within the Commission for responsibilities incumbent on it in external relations and for coordinating other aspects of the Union's external action. In exercising these responsibilities within the Commission, and only for these responsibilities, the High Representative shall be bound by Commission procedures to the extent that this is consistent with paragraphs 2 and 3.

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZAGG Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Pedersen II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ ROBERT G. PEDERSEN IIRobert G. Pedersen IIChief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2010