alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01013401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/134 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/134

---

Article 194

1.   In the context of the establishment and functioning of the internal market and with regard for the need to preserve and improve the environment, Union policy on energy shall aim, in a spirit of solidarity between Member States, to:

| (a) | ensure the functioning of the energy market; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

ensure the functioning of the energy market;

| (b) | ensure security of energy supply in the Union; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

ensure security of energy supply in the Union;

| (c) | promote energy efficiency and energy saving and the development of new and renewable forms of energy; and |
| --- | --- |

(c)

promote energy efficiency and energy saving and the development of new and renewable forms of energy; and

| (d) | promote the interconnection of energy networks. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

promote the interconnection of energy networks.

2.   Without prejudice to the application of other provisions of the Treaties, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish the measures necessary to achieve the objectives in paragraph 1. Such measures shall be adopted after consultation of the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

Such measures shall not affect a Member State's right to determine the conditions for exploiting its energy resources, its choice between different energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply, without prejudice to Article 192(2)(c).

3.   By way of derogation from paragraph 2, the Council, acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure, shall unanimously and after consulting the European Parliament, establish the measures referred to therein when they are primarily of a fiscal nature.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 155 (Monday, August 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48863-48864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19473]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Renewal

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, (Pub. L. 92-463), and in accordance with Title 41 of the 
Code of Federal Regulations, Section 102-3.65, and following 
consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Fusion Energy 
Sciences Advisory Committee will be renewed for a two-year period 
beginning on August 2, 2013.
    The Committee will provide advice to the Office of Science (DOE), 
on long-range plans, priorities, and strategies for advancing plasma 
science, fusion science and fusion technology--the knowledge base 
needed for an economically and environmentally attractive fusion energy 
source.
    Additionally, the renewal of the Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory 
Committee has been determined to be essential to conduct business of 
the Department of Energy and to be in the public interest in connection 
with the

[[Page 48864]]

performance of duties imposed upon the Department of Energy, by law and 
agreement. The Committee will continue to operate in accordance with 
the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, adhering to the 
rules and regulations in implementation of that Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edmund J. Synakowski at (301) 903-
4941.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 5, 2013.
Carol A. Matthews,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-19473 Filed 8-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
sourceTypeID roadTypeID roadTypeVMTFraction

11 1 0.000000

11 2 0.023976

11 3 0.066933

11 4 0.429572

11 5 0.479520

21 1 0.000000

21 2 0.023976

21 3 0.066933

21 4 0.429572

21 5 0.479520

31 1 0.000000

31 2 0.023976

31 3 0.066933

31 4 0.429572

31 5 0.479520

32 1 0.000000

32 2 0.023976

32 3 0.066933

32 4 0.429572

32 5 0.479520

41 1 0.000000

41 2 0.023976

41 3 0.066933

41 4 0.429572

41 5 0.479520

42 1 0.000000

42 2 0.023976

42 3 0.066933

42 4 0.429572

42 5 0.479520

43 1 0.000000

43 2 0.023976

43 3 0.066933

43 4 0.429572

43 5 0.479520

51 1 0.000000

51 2 0.023976

51 3 0.066933

51 4 0.429572

51 5 0.479520

52 1 0.000000

52 2 0.023976

52 3 0.066933

52 4 0.429572

52 5 0.479520

53 1 0.000000

53 2 0.023976

53 3 0.066933

53 4 0.429572

53 5 0.479520

54 1 0.000000
54

2 0.023976

543 0.066933

544 0.429572

545 0.479520

611 0.000000

612 0.023976

613 0.066933

614 0.429572

615 0.479520

621 0.000000

622 0.023976

623 0.066933

624 0.429572

625 0.479520
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART TWO

ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES

ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TREATIES

TITLE II

OTHER ADJUSTMENTS

OTHER ADJUSTMENTS

Article 13

Article 52(1) of the TEU shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.   The Treaties shall apply to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Croatia, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.’.

---
#### Kenneth W. Jacobson, Plaintiff, v Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Amodio Landscaping Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party plaintiff Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered August 30, 1989, as granted the motion of the third-party defendant Amodio Landscaping Corporation for an award of counsel fees and costs in the sum of $9,509.

*710Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured when he slipped on a patch of ice in the parking lot of a branch of the Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (hereinafter Chase) and commenced this action against Chase to recover damages. Over a year after the main action was commenced, Chase commenced a third-party action against Amodio Landscaping Corporation (hereinafter Amodio), alleging that Amodio was responsible for the dangerous condition. The plaintiff settled his action against Chase, and a trial was held on the third-party action. At the close of evidence, the court dismissed the action and awarded Amodio its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of defending the action pursuant to CPLR 8303-a.

We find that the record fully supports the court’s determination that a reasonable investigation by Chase would have revealed that Amodio was not at fault in the happening of this accident and that the third-party action was frivolous *(see,*CPLR 8303-a [c] [ii]; *Patane v Griffin,*164 AD2d 192; *Fritze v Versailles,*158 AD2d 669). Amodio had an agreement with Chase to plow snow from its parking lot. Chase failed to establish that it had snowed prior to the plaintiff’s accident, that Amodio had notice of the icy condition in the parking lot, or that Amodio was required to correct this condition in the absence of a request from Chase. Furthermore, evidence was offered that Chase was aware, prior to the commencement of the third-party action, that the icy condition was probably caused by an overflowing drainpipe, rather than by any acts or omissions of Amodio. Since the action was frivolous, the imposition of sanctions was mandated under CPLR 8303-a *(see, Fritze v Versailles, supra; Mitchell v Herald Co.,*137 AD2d 213).

We do not find that the appeal from the judgment of the trial court warrants the imposition of sanctions against Chase under CPLR 8303-a *(see, Patane v Griffin, supra).*Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         254,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,022,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                   595,300
<INVENTORY>                                     14,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               794,700
<PP&E>                                       1,867,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 305,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,803,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,301,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,400
<COMMON>                                        27,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     779,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,803,600
<SALES>                                        352,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               616,600
<CGS>                                          107,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  494,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of
MFC Bancorp Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Michael J. Smith, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | April 10, 2018
|----- | --------------



|/s/ Michael J. Smith           | 
|------------------------------ | 
|By: Michael J. Smith           | 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer |
# C_2016202EN.01014201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/142 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/142

---

Article 212

(ex Article 181a TEC)

(ex Article 181a

1.   Without prejudice to the other provisions of the Treaties, and in particular Articles 208 to 211, the Union shall carry out economic, financial and technical cooperation measures, including assistance, in particular financial assistance, with third countries other than developing countries. Such measures shall be consistent with the development policy of the Union and shall be carried out within the framework of the principles and objectives of its external action. The Union's operations and those of the Member States shall complement and reinforce each other.

2.   The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall adopt the measures necessary for the implementation of paragraph 1.

3.   Within their respective spheres of competence, the Union and the Member States shall cooperate with third countries and the competent international organisations. The arrangements for Union cooperation may be the subject of agreements between the Union and the third parties concerned.

The first subparagraph shall be without prejudice to the Member States' competence to negotiate in international bodies and to conclude international agreements.

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants first fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Joseph F. Furlong, IIIJoseph F. Furlong, IIIChief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6482

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARINO RAMIREZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-93-90, CA-97-556-2)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles E. Haden, Hampton, Virginia, for Appellant. Fernando

Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Ramirez, Nos. CR-93-90; CA-97-556-2 (E.D.

Va. Mar. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10.10.1


                          FIFTH SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT


     THIS FIFTH SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, dated as of the 26th day of November,
2001, to the Lease dated February 18, 1998, the First Supplemental Agreement
dated October 26, 1998, the Second Supplemental Agreement dated August 31, 1999,
the Third Supplemental Agreement dated September 14, 1999 and the Fourth
Supplemental Agreement dated May 1, 2000 by and between FIVE N ASSOCIATES of 40
Temple Street, Nashua, New Hampshire (Lessor) and SKILLSOFT CORPORATION of 20
Industrial Park Drive, Nashua, New Hampshire (Lessee).

     WHEREAS the Lessor and the Lessee desire to amend the Lease effective
November 26, 2001, as follows:

     Section 1 - Leased Premises: The Leased Premises shall include an
additional 1,683 square feet of space on the first floor.

     Section 3.1 - Rent: The annual rent shall be changed to One Hundred Sixty
Eight Thousand Four Hundred Forty and 32/00 Dollars ($168,440.32) and shall be
payable in monthly installments of Fourteen Thousand Seven Hundred Forty Nine
and 90/00 ($14,740.90).

     Section 3.3 - Pro-rata Share - The Lessee's pro-rata share shall be changed
to 84.638% and the additional monthly rent shall be changed to Six Thousand Nine
Hundred Thirty Six and 71/00 Dollars ($6,936.71).

     Section 11.2 - Use of the Premises:  The Lessee's parking percentage shall
be changed to 84.638.

     Section 13.1 - Taxes: The Lessees pro-rata share of real estate taxes and
assessments shall be changed to 84.643%

     Section 28.1 - Rent for Renewal: The rental amount used to calculate the
rent for the renewal term shall be changed to Fourteen Thousand Seven Hundred
Forty Nine and 90/00 Dollars ($14,749.90).

     Except as hereinabove amended, all the provisions of the above mentioned
Lease and all Supplemental Agreements shall remain in full force and effect.







<PAGE>
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Fifth Supplemental
Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written.





                                           FIVE N ASSOCIATES


/s/ Barbara J. [Illegible]                 /s/ Q. Peter Nash
--------------------------                 ---------------------------------
Witness                                    Q. Peter Nash, Managing Partner




                                           SKILLSOFT CORPORATION


/s/ Thomas J. McDonald                     /s/ Charles E. Moran
--------------------------                 ---------------------------------
Witness                                    Charles E. Moran, President & CEO
EXHIBIT 31.2



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Nick J. Caruso, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Dynegy Inc. (Dynegy);



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Dynegy as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. Dynegys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Dynegy and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Dynegy, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of
Dynegys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such
evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this
quarterly report any change in Dynegys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Dynegys
internal control over financial reporting; and



5.
Dynegys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Dynegys auditors and the audit committee of Dynegys board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Dynegys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Dynegys internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: January 19, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    NICK J. CARUSO                                              
|                       |  |     |  | Nick J. Caruso Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
391 A.2d 693

#### Commonwealth v. Gregory Moore, Appellant.

*621Submitted November 14, 1977.

Donald R. Marsh, for appellant; No appearance entered nor brief submitted for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE IV

SOLIDARITY

SOLIDARITY

Article 28

Right of collective bargaining and action

Workers and employers, or their respective organisations, have, in accordance with Union law and national laws and practices, the right to negotiate and conclude collective agreements at the appropriate levels and, in cases of conflicts of interest, to take collective action to defend their interests, including strike action.

---