alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000879235
<NAME> AUTOCAM CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,239,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,654,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,476,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,039,603
<PP&E>                                      56,223,685
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,447,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,702,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,025,647
<BONDS>                                     10,804,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    26,200,357
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,028,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,702,484
<SALES>                                     29,917,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,917,529
<CGS>                                       22,960,293
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,960,293
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             640,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,522,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,577,739
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,944,840
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,944,840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
        

</TABLE>
2017 ANNUAL INDUSTRY MEETING 

FOR USDA FOODS CONTRACTORS AND SUPPLIERS

Doubletree Hotel by Hilton – Arlington, Virginia

AGENDA

SPECIALTY CROP PROGRAM—Salon BC

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

1:00 - 1:15 Welcome

1:15 - 3:00 Business Management Improvement (BMI) Presentation/Discussion

Dave Tuckwiller, Director, Commodity Procurement Staff

3:00 - 3:30 Break

3:30 - 4:15 BMI Discussion (cont.)

Commodity Procurement Staff

4:15 - 4:45 Food and Nutrition Service Initiatives

Kathy Staley, Chief, Program Integrity and Monitoring Branch

4:45 - 5:00 American Commodity Distribution Association (ACDA) Update

Mike Birkmeyer, Co-Chair of the ACDA Processing Committee

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

8:00 - 8:30 How to Become a Certified USDA Vendor

Andie Lang and Sean Frey, Commodity Procurement Staff

8:30 - 9:15 New Products/Sodium

Laura Walter, Commodity Procurement Staff

9:15 - 9:30 Domestic Origin Verification Program

Sean Martin, Specialty Crops Inspection Division, SCP

9:30 - 10:00 Unprocessed Pilot Program

Camillia Freeland-Taylor and Kyle Hugo, Commodity Procurement Staff

10:00 - 10:30 Break

10:30 - 11:00 Inspection Issues

Cynthia Rodeheaver, Specialty Crops Inspection Division, SCP

11:00 - 11:45 Contracting and Purchase Schedule Updates

Sean Frey and David Munford, Commodity Procurement Staff

11:45 - 12:30 Small Table Discussions
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 173 (Wednesday, September 7, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61682-61683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21462]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9951-89-OARM]

Good Neighbor Environmental Board; Notification of Public 
Advisory Committee Teleconference

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public advisory committee teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-
463, notice is hereby given that the Good Neighbor Environmental Board 
(Board) will hold a public teleconference on October 14, 2016 from 
12:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. For further information 
regarding the teleconference and background materials, please contact 
Mark Joyce at the number and email provided below.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Background: The Good Neighbor Environmental Board is a federal 
advisory committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
Public Law 92-463. By statute, the Board is required to submit an 
annual report to the President on environmental and infrastructure 
issues along the U.S. border with Mexico.
    Purpose of Meeting: The purpose of this teleconference is to 
discuss and approve the Board's Seventeenth Report to the President, 
which focuses on climate change along the U.S.-Mexico border.
    General Information: The agenda and teleconference materials, as 
well as general information about the Board, can be found at http://
www2.epa.gov/

[[Page 61683]]

faca/gneb. If you wish to make oral comments or submit written comments 
to the Board, please contact Mark Joyce at least five days prior to the 
teleconference.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities, please contact Mark Joyce at (202) 564-
2130 or email at joyce.mark@epa.gov. To request accommodation of a 
disability, please contact Mark Joyce at least 10 days prior to the 
meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: August 25, 2016.
Mark Joyce,
Acting Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-21462 Filed 9-6-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 23

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of California Microwave, Inc. of our report dated August 8, 1997 included in
the 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of California Microwave, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of California
Microwave, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No.'s 33-09117, 33-24517, 33-44397, 33-58108, 33-73584,
33-86968, 333-19015 and 333-35025) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan,
1992 Restricted Stock Plan, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 1986 Stock Option
Plan of California Microwave, Inc.; the Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement
between California Microwave, Inc. and Frederick Lawrence dated effective as of
July 16, 1997; and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-60957)
pertaining to the Microwave Networks Incorporated 1990 Non-Qualified Stock
Option Plan for Employees and 1990 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for 
non-Employed Directors and Consultants of our report dated August 8, 1997, with
respect to the financial statements incorporated herein by reference.


                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                    ----------------------
                                                        Ernst & Young LLP
Palo Alto, California
September 26, 1997
Exhibit 21

                              Subsidiaries


     Avcon Industries, Inc., a Kansas Corporation

     Butler National Services, Inc., a Florida Corporation,
     formerly Lauderdale Services, Inc.

     Butler National Corporation Consulting Engineers, Inc.,
     a Kansas Corporation, formerly HSD, Inc.

     Butler National Service Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

     Butler National, Inc., a Nevada Corporation

     Butler Temporary Services, Inc., a Missouri Corporation

     Woodson Avionics, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation

     Cansas International Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

     R F, Inc., a Missouri Corporation

     Valu Foods, Inc., a Kansas Corporation


<PAGE>
# SWCVTEMP_UNS
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1042

_____________________________
D EANDES Y OUNG ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assist ance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

June 20, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and O STERHAUS and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

________________________ _____ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Deandes Young, pro se
, Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/State Street Collective
Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert E. Fullam, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert E. FullamRobert E. FullamChief Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2009
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### February 3, 2015 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

SHAMEKA BANKS; TIMOTHY JOHNSON; CAROL JONES, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES; BACONE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE; MUSKOGEE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants-Appellees. No. 14-7067 (D.C. No. 6:14-CV-00100-RAW) (E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before GORSUCH , MURPHY , and HOLMES , Circuit Judges. While attending Bacone Christian College, Timothy Johnson was sent to Muskogee Regional Medical Center to undergo psychiatric treatment. No one contacted Mr. Johnson’s mother, Shameka Banks, or his grandmother, Carol Jones. Mr. Johnson, Ms. Banks, and Ms. Jones allege that Bacone, MRMC, and

*After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.American Baptist Churches should’ve notified the family about Mr. Johnson’s hospitalization. The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). On appeal, the family members insist their case is strong but do not directly address any of the dispositive problems the district court identified in their pleadings, let alone point out any defects in that court’s judgment. While this court takes seriously its obligation to construe liberally pro se filings like those here, it will not invent arguments for reversal that a litigant does not even touch upon. See Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & Janer, 425 F.3d 836, 840 (10th Cir. 2005). This court “cannot take on the responsibility of serving as the litigant’s attorney in constructing arguments and searching the record.” Id. Pro se litigants, moreover, are not excused from following the same rules of procedure that govern other litigants. Id. The family members’ briefs don’t come close to complying with Fed. R. App. P. 28 — the rule governing the form and content of appellate briefs. The briefs fail to list any issues for appeal, don’t explain why the court erred in dismissing their claims, and lack any citations to authority whatsoever.

- 2 -The judgment is affirmed.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Neil M. Gorsuch Circuit Judge

.

- 3 -
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1216 

To revise the authorized route of the North Country National Scenic Trail 

in northeastern Minnesota and to extend the trail into Vermont to 

connect with the Appalachian National Scenic Trail, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2019 

Mr. WELCH (for himself, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. POCAN, Ms. 

MCCOLLUM, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. BEYER, Mrs. CRAIG, Mr. COLLINS of 

New York, and Mr. GROTHMAN) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To revise the authorized route of the North Country National 

Scenic Trail in northeastern Minnesota and to extend 

the trail into Vermont to connect with the Appalachian 

National Scenic Trail, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Country Na5 tional Scenic Trail Route Adjustment Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1216 IH

1 SEC. 2. ROUTE ADJUSTMENT. 

2 Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 

3 U.S.C. 1244(a)(8)) is amended in the first sentence— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘thirty-two hundred miles, ex5 tending from eastern New York State’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘4,600 miles, extending from the Appalachian Trail 

7 in Vermont’’; and 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘Proposed North Country Trail’’ 

9 and all that follows through ‘‘June 1975.’’ and in10 serting ‘‘ ‘North Country National Scenic Trail, Au11 thorized Route’, dated February 2014, and num12 bered 649/116870.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Valuation Firm

We hereby consent to the references to
Houlihan Capital Advisors, LLC (Houlihan) and to our valuation report dated December 31, 2010 relating to the estimation of fair value of certain auction rate securities held by MasTec, Inc. (the Company) as of
December 31, 2010, including the use of information contained within our Report in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and to the incorporation by reference of such information from the
Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-139996, 333-112010, 333-105781, 333-105516, 333-38932, 333-77823, 333-47003, 333-38940 and 333-30647, Form S-3 Nos.
333-158502, 333-142083, 333-133252, 333-46067 and Form S-4 No. 333-170834).



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/ Houlihan Capital Advisors, LLC
|Houlihan Capital Advisors, LLC    
|February 21, 2011
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|/s/ PAUL R. FLANDERS                                                                 
|Paul R. Flanders Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer March 11, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Periodic Report), I, James M. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ James M. Johnson
James M. Johnson
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2008

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER 

Appellate case name: Felicia Nicole Jones v. Macy’s, Eric Limbocker, Citibank, and 

Houston Federal Credit Union

Appellate case number: 01-14-00143-CV

Trial court case number: 74030

Trial court: 239th District Court of Brazoria County

It is ordered that Appellant’s “Application to Stay the Enforcement of that Judgment” is

denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle 

  

Date: April 21, 2015
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derek Chisholm, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Farlo, J.), rendered March 4, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*630Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s allegation that the testimony of a police officer bolstered the complainant’s identification testimony in violation of the principles enunciated in *People v Trowbridge*(305 NY 471) is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v West,*56 NY2d 662; *People v Moore,*159 AD2d 521, 522). In any event, the officer’s testimony did not have a bolstering effect because he did not refer to the victim’s identification of the defendant *(see, People v Moore, supra,*at 522).

During the precharge conference, the parties stipulated that the court "need not marshal the evidence”. Therefore, the defendant’s contention that the court erred by refusing to marshal the evidence is not only unpreserved for appellate review but was expressly waived by him *(see, People v Sanchez,*136 AD2d 751, 752). In any event, the court’s failure to marshal the evidence did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial *(see, People v Saunders,*64 NY2d 665).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in refusing to substitute new counsel in place of his assigned counsel on the eve of trial *(see, People v Medina,*44 NY2d 199, 206-207; *People v Daniels,*156 AD2d 705, 706; *People v Taitt,*146 AD2d 658). Motions requesting the assignment of new counsel must not be granted casually, but upon good cause shown *(see, People v Sawyer,*57 NY2d 12, 18-19, *cert denied*459 US 1178; *People v Medina, supra,*at 207-208; *People v Leach,*108 AD2d 871, 872). The record reflects that the defendant failed to articulate any reasons for the requested substitution and thus did not demonstrate good cause *(see, People v Medina, supra; People v Daniels, supra).*

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 15-0064

JEFF KILLINGSWORTH

v.

THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF

THE CITY OF DALLAS

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

March 6, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, JEFF KILLINGSWORTH, pay all costs incurred on

this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 16th day of April, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VIII

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

CHAPTER 1

ECONOMIC POLICY

Article 124

(ex Article 102 TEC)

(ex Article 102 TEC)

Any measure, not based on prudential considerations, establishing privileged access by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of Member States to financial institutions, shall be prohibited.

---