alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016203EN.01000501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/5

---

Article 1

By this Treaty the HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES establish among themselves a EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY (EURATOM).

It shall be the task of the Community to contribute to the raising of the standard of living in the Member States and to the development of relations with the other countries by creating the conditions necessary for the speedy establishment and growth of nuclear industries.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MIROSLAV KOVALCIK,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 13 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aventura Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig A. Waltzer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                |  |  |  |     |  |                                                
|--------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|August 20, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Craig A. Waltzer                           
|                |  |  |  |     |  | Craig A. Waltzer                               
|                |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
NO. 07-08-0460-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	DECEMBER 16, 2008

	______________________________

	JOSE MANUEL RAMOS, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

	NO. A17772-0809; HONORABLE ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant, Jose Manuel Ramos, pleaded guilty to, and was convicted of, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.  Punishment was assessed at six years confinement.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal challenging his conviction.  The Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal reflects that Appellant’s case is a plea-bargain case from which he has no right of appeal.  By letter dated December 2, 2008, this Court notified Appellant that the certification indicated he had no right of appeal and invited him to either file an amended certification showing a right of appeal or demonstrate other grounds for continuing the appeal.  Appellant was also notified that failure to do so might result in dismissal of the appeal pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.  Appellant timely filed a pro se response entitled “Amended Certification Grounds for Appeal.”  

	A review of Appellant’s response does not contradict the certification filed by the trial court.  Rather, Appellant presents “grounds” more akin to issues presented in a brief.  He does not, however, show cause for continuing his appeal.  Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed based on the certification signed by the trial court.

	Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

							Patrick A. Pirtle

							      Justice

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RiskMetrics Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date: May 6, 2010/s/ M. ETHAN BERMAN M. Ethan Berman (Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00104-CV

THOMAS RAY SIDES,

Appellant

v.

WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR T.D.C.J.-I.D.,

Appellee

From Coryell County, Texas

ORDER

Thomas Ray Sides’s appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction on April 2, 2015. 

He has since filed a “Motion to Suspend Rule 9.5 ‘Tex. Rules App. Pro. 9.5’ Copy Rule”1

and a motion for an extension of time to an application to proceed “in forma pauperis.”

Since there is still time for Sides to file a motion for rehearing of his dismissal, his 

motion to suspend the copy rule is granted. Sides is only required to file one copy. Sides 

 

1 The “copy” rule is actually Rule 9.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Sides v. Stephens Page 2

is reminded he must still serve a copy of all pleadings on the appellee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

9.5(a), (d), (e).

Because we do not have jurisdiction of Sides’s appeal and have dismissed that 

appeal, and whether he proceeded as a pauper or not, Sides would, nevertheless, owe the 

filing fee. Accordingly, Sides’s motion to extend the time to file an application to proceed 

“in forma pauperis” is denied.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion to suspend granted

Motion to extend time denied

Order issued and filed April 16, 2015
Official Listing of Eligible Suppliers 

Animal Protein Free Verification Program for Saudi Arabia

Page 1 of 3 

Last Revised March 14, 2024

Company Est. Number Effective Date

Perdue Foods LLC

Accomac Complex

22520 Lankford Highway

Accomac, VA 23301

Phone: (410) 543-3015

Email: Rita.Harkless@perdue.com

Contact: Rita Harkless

P-7903 April 21, 2013

Perdue Foods LLC

Cromwell Complex

5025 Highway 231 South 

Beaver Dam, KY 42320

Phone: (410) 543-3015

Email: Rita.Harkless@perdue.com

Contact: Rita Harkless

P-19112 March 4, 2014

Perdue Foods LLC

Dillon Complex 

2047 Highway 9

Dillon, SC 29536

Phone: (410) 543-3015

Email: Rita.Harkless@perdue.com

Contact: Rita Harkless

P-18285 October 1, 2015

Perdue Foods LLC

Draper Valley Farms

1000 Jason Lane

Mount Vernon, WA 98237

Phone: (410) 543-3015

Email: Rita.Harkless@perdue.com

Contact: Rita Harkless

P-6058 June 8, 2018
Official Listing of Eligible Suppliers 

Animal Protein Free Verification Program for Saudi Arabia

Page 2 of 3 

Last Revised March 14, 2024

Company Est. Number Effective Date

Perdue Foods

Lewiston Complex

3539 Governors Road

Lewiston, NC 27849

Phone: (410) 543-3015

Email: Rita.Harkless@perdue.com

Contact: Rita Harkless

P-9197 April 12, 2013

Perdue Foods LLC

Milford Complex

255 N. Rehoboth Blvd.

Milford, DE 19963

Phone: (410) 543-3015

Email: Rita.Harkless@perdue.com

Contact: Rita Harkless

P-1318 April 20, 2013

Perdue Foods LLC

Perry Complex

250 Georgia Highway 247 Spur

Perry, GA 31069

Phone: (410) 543-3015

Email: Rita.Harkless@perdue.com

Contact: Rita Harkless

P-21234 May 21, 2012

Perdue Foods LLC

Perry Facility

240 Georgia Highway 247 Spur

Perry, GA 31069

P Phone: (410) 543-3015

Email: Rita.Harkless@perdue.com

Contact: Rita Harkless

P-33944 May 21, 2012
Official Listing of Eligible Suppliers 

Animal Protein Free Verification Program for Saudi Arabia

Page 3 of 3 

Last Revised March 14, 2024

Company Est. Number Effective Date

Perdue Foods LLC

Petaluma Poultry

2700 Lakeville Highway

Petaluma, CA 94955

Phone: (410) 543-3015

Email: Rita.Harkless@perdue.com

Contact: Rita Harkless

P-2882 February 26, 2018

Shenandoah Valley Organic

862 North Liberty Street

Harrisonburg, VA 22802

Phone: (540) 908-3556 ext. 1061; 

(361) 816-3000

Email: Jeannie.LopezFlores@farmerfocus.com; 

Dmitriy.Korotkov@farmerfocus.com 

Contact: Jeannie Lopez-Flores; Dmitriy 

Korotkov

P-46826 March 28, 2017

Wayne Farms LLC

Dothan Facility

808 Ross Circle NE

Dothan, AL 36303

Phone: (770) 538-2172

Email: david.dahlke@waynefarms.com

Contact: David Dahlke

P-7342 February 03, 2017

Wayne Farms LLC

Union Springs Facility

444 Baskin Street South

Union Springs, AL 36089

Phone: (770) 538-2172

Email: david.dahlke@waynefarms.com

Contact: David Dahlke

P-912 February 03, 2017
April 21, 2015

SUBSTITUTE JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BRAZOS PRESBYTERIAN HOMES, INC. D/B/A THE HALLMARK, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00478-CV V.

AUGUST SCHUMACHER LANDER, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF BETTY S. LANDER, DECEASED, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal from 

the order signed by the court below on May 30, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We order this Court’s Majority and Concurring Memorandum Opinions 

issued February 10, 2015, WITHDRAWN. We VACATE this Court’s judgment 

issued February 10, 2015, and issue this substitute judgment in its place. 

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

**CONSENT OF DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON**

 

February 24, 2011

 

Nexen Inc.

801-7th Avenue S.W.

Calgary, Alberta  T2P 3P7

 

Board of Directors:

 

We hereby consent to references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton, and information from our reports concerning the United Kingdom, Yemen Masila, Nigeria and Canada, respectively, relating to our evaluation of certain oil and gas properties of Nexen Inc. (the “Corporation”), contained in the sections entitled “Reserves, Production and Related Information” and “Interests of Experts” in the Annual Information Form of the Corporation dated February 16, 2011 which is included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 40-F”), as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) the Form 40-F; (ii) the Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-119276, 333-118019 and 333-13574, (iii) the Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-142670, 333-142652 and 333-84786, and (iv) the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-159551), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable.

 

Very truly yours,

 
| /s/   DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON            |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                      |   |
| DeGOLYER   and MacNAUGHTON                |   |
| Texas   Registered Engineering Firm F-716 |   |

 

1

----
# C_2016202EN.01019301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/193 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/193

---

Article 340

(ex Article 288 TEC)

(ex Article 288 TEC)

The contractual liability of the Union shall be governed by the law applicable to the contract in question.

In the case of non-contractual liability, the Union shall, in accordance with the general principles common to the laws of the Member States, make good any damage caused by its institutions or by its servants in the performance of their duties.

Notwithstanding the second paragraph, the European Central Bank shall, in accordance with the general principles common to the laws of the Member States, make good any damage caused by it or by its servants in the performance of their duties.

The personal liability of its servants towards the Union shall be governed by the provisions laid down in their Staff Regulations or in the Conditions of Employment applicable to them.

---
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

                ASSUMPTION OF AND AMENDMENT TO COMPAQ STOCK PLANS
                -------------------------------------------------

     WHEREAS: The Board of Directors deems it advisable and in the best
interests of HP to assume certain stock plans of Compaq and amend the terms of
certain of the assumed stock plans of Compaq to remove the automatic director
grant provisions;

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That, effective at and contingent upon the
occurrence of the Effective Time, the following stock plans of Compaq are
assumed and HP shall be deemed the successor to Compaq under each plan:

     Compaq Computer Corporation 2001 Stock Option Plan
     Compaq Computer Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan
     Compaq Computer Corporation 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, and
     Compaq Computer Corporation 1989 Equity Incentive Plan

(collectively, the "Assumed Plans");

     RESOLVED FURTHER: That, effective at and contingent upon the occurrence of
the Effective Time, the Board of Directors hereby reserves a sufficient number
of shares of its authorized but unissued common stock of HP, par value $0.01 per
share, for issuance upon exercise of stock options and other rights to be
granted under the Assumed Plans and, when issued in accordance with the Assumed
Plans, such shares will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable;

     RESOLVED FURTHER: That, effective at and contingent upon the occurrence of
the Effective Time, the Board of Directors designates the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors to administer the Assumed Plans, including without
limitation the authority to amend and terminate the Assumed Plans;

     RESOLVED FURTHER: That, effective at and contingent upon the occurrence of
the Effective Time, Section 8 of the Compaq Computer Corporation 2001 Stock
Option Plan is deleted in full;

     RESOLVED FURTHER: That, effective at and contingent upon the occurrence of
the Effective Time, Section 8 of the Compaq Computer Corporation 1998 Stock
Option Plan is deleted in full.


<Page>

     I, CHARLES N. CHARNAS, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected and
acting Assistant Secretary of Hewlett-Packard Company, a Delaware
corporation; that the above is a true and correct copy of the resolutions
relating to the amendment of certain stock plans assumed in connection with
the merger between Hewlett-Packard Company and Compaq Computer Corporation
adopted by the members of the Board of Directors of Hewlett-Packard Company
on May 2, 2002; and that the resolutions have not been annulled, rescinded,
or revoked and remain in full force and effect.

Date:  May 7, 2002                      /s/ Charles N. Charnas
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Charles N. Charnas
                                        Assistant Secretary
Exhibit 10(a)


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (the
"Registration Statement") of our report dated April 25, 2002, relating to the
financial statements of the Prudential Discovery Select Group Variable Contract
Account, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the
use in this Registration Statement of our report dated February 12, 2002,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of The Prudential Insurance
Company of America, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also
consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration
Statement.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



New York, New York
April 25, 2002
y

MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00695-CV

KIPP, INC., Appellant

V.

KIMBERLY WHITEHEAD, Appellee

Appeal from the 234th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011-70657).

TO THE 234TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 12th day of August 2014, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by 

the trial court on July 26, 2013. After submitting the case on 

the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the 

parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains 

no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, KIPP, Inc., pay all 

appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.
Judgment rendered August 12, 2014.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Jennings.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

April 17, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 114TH DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 11th

day of February, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

DARRYL EARL DANIELS, JR., Appellant

NO. 12-15-00023-CR; Trial Court No. 114-0391-13

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and 

that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this 

appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be 

certified to the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 7

th day of April, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE II

FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

CHAPTER 3

PROHIBITION OF QUANTITATIVE RESTRICTIONS BETWEEN MEMBER STATES

Article 36

(ex Article 30 TEC)

(ex Article 30 TEC)

The provisions of Articles 34 and 35 shall not preclude prohibitions or restrictions on imports, exports or goods in transit justified on grounds of public morality, public policy or public security; the protection of health and life of humans, animals or plants; the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value; or the protection of industrial and commercial property. Such prohibitions or restrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.

---
**EXHIBIT 23**

** **

**CONSENTOF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP**

** **

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-80666, 333-61556,and 333-136698) of Bemis Company, Inc. of our reports dated February 27,2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statementschedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

Minneapolis,Minnesota

### **February 27, 2009**

 

50

----
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00649-CR

JOHN ANDREW GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County. (Tr. Ct. No. 73555).

This case is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on August 4, 

2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible 

error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered April 16, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle. Opinion delivered by Justice 

Higley.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Orlando Guerra, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berkowitz, J.), rendered April 3, 1989.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed *(see, People v Seaberg,*
      *57674 NY2d 1). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.