alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1199 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1199

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a study 
 regarding the accessibility of websites of the Department of Veterans 
               Affairs to individuals with disabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Website Accessibility Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. STUDY REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF WEBSITES OF THE DEPARTMENT 
              OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES.

    (a) Study.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall examine all 
websites (including attached files and web-based applications) of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs to determine whether such websites are 
accessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with section 
508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d).
    (b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after completing the study 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit a report to Congress 
regarding such study. The report shall include the following:
            (1) A list of each website, file, or web-based application 
        described in subsection (a) that is not accessible to 
        individuals with disabilities in accordance with section 508 of 
        the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d).
            (2) For each website, file, or web-based application 
        identified under paragraph (1), a description of the barriers 
        to bringing such website, file, or web-based application into 
        compliance with the requirements of such section, including 
        barriers relating to staffing.
            (3) The plan of the Secretary to bring each website, file, 
        or web-based application identified in the list under paragraph 
        (1) into compliance with the requirements of section 508 of the 
        Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d).
    (c) Definition of Website.--In this section, the term ``website'' 
includes a kiosk at a Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility, 
the use of which is required to check in for scheduled appointments.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 15, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply11796Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  Riff Lanier (not verified)PermalinkFebruary 23, 2022 - 2:56pmWhat an inspiring story.  You should consider mentorship so that other young men can be inspired by your success!!  Congratulations!!
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
## Ifi e Grate rNaple s Qim k o f(ommerc e ^,-0 , n n ^-V, Tn r Sea-in g all o f Collie rCour.t y 

### IRANSPORWiO N
. , :OCKE TOPERATIONS ' ZGi O OC T- M A ^2 ^ Augus t 25 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra y LaHoo d U.S
. Secretary o f

Transportatio n Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Program(Naple s Airport Authority ) Dea r Secretary LaHood : O n behal f

o f th e Chambe r

Boar dan dou r

1,900 IVlembe

r companie s employin g 60,00 0 worker s i n Collie r

Count>' , I writ e t o expres s ou r stron g suppor t

for you r affirmativ e consideratio n o f

Naple s Airpor t

Authority' s reques t

t o secur e federal assistanc e unde r th e Smal l Communit y Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Program
. Tlii s fundin g i s importan t an dwil l ai di n re-establishin g acces s t o th e nationa l ai r transportatio n syste mfor ou r community
. Tliere i s aremarkabl e deficienc y throughou t th e regio n serve db y ou r airport
. Your support o f thi s applicatio n woul dhel p th e Naple s Aiipor t Authorit y i n meetin g th e need s o f ou r local businesses , resident s an dth e mor e than on e millio n visitor s wh o enjo y ou r beautifij l are aeac h year . Pleas e kno w tha t

w e appreciat e th e opportunit y to shar e thes e suggestion s with you . Respectfull y Submitted ,

• 1 - • / • / /
Michae l V
. Reagen , Ph.D
. Presiden t & CE O Th e Greate r

Naple s Chambe r

o f Commerc e & Leadershi p Collie r

Foimdatio n

23901^miainiIrdiUJort h - Suits210-Naples,Florida3410 3 - Phone(239)262-637 6 • Faj((239)262-837 4 - wvw.iiapleschamber.o/ g
hoals 

•7 

May9, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Reference; DOT-OST-2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-Q305, 2000-7856 

:) /- ) c ·- ~) '-' 

Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS, Tupelo, MS and Muscle Shoals, AL EAS 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

Shoals Hospital in Muscle Shoals, Alabama wishes to lend its support to the proposal of Silver Airways to 

provide essential air service at Muscle Shoals, ALas replacement for current Delta Air Lines service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air 

transportation system is critical to the economic well being of Muscle Shoals, ALand to Shoals Hospital. 

We at Shoals Hospital rely on our local air service for both business and leisure travel. 

The Silver Airways proposals offer us a modern 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta, which is 

not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a popular business and leisure travel destination 

from Muscle Shoals, AL in its own right. 

We believe the Silver air service proposals represent the best option for retaining our local air service 

long term and building up traffic so that government subsidies can eventually be reduced or eliminated. 

We urge the Department of Transportation to award Silver Airways the designation to provide Muscle 

Shoals, AL's essential air service. 

With kindest regards, I am, 

P.O. Box 3359 • 20! Avalon Avenue· Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 ·Phone: (256) 386-!60! ·Fax: (256) 386-!575
Exhibit 10.32



2NDEXTENSION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



This
Extension of Employment Agreement (this Agreement) effective as of September 30, 2004, by and between CARROLS CORPORATION (Employer), a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware having an address at 968 James Street,
Syracuse, New York 13203 and DANIEL T. ACCORDINO whose principal residence is 6556 Ridgewood Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 (Employee).



| | 1. | Employer and Employee previously entered into a certain employment agreement dated January 1, 1995, as amended April 3, 1996, as further amended and restated on March 27, 1997
and as further amended and extended on April 1, 2002 (the Employment Agreement), which agreement expired on September 30, 2004.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Employer and Employee have agreed to extend the term of the Employment Agreement to December 31, 2005.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | The Carrols Corporation Compensation Committee has approved the extension of the Employment Agreement as herein provided.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | By this Agreement, the Employment Agreement is extended, effective as of September 30, 2004, through December 31, 2005, upon all terms and conditions set forth in the Employment
Agreement.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties
hereto have executed and have caused this Extension of Employment Agreement to be executed on November 1, 2004.



CARROLS CORPORATION/s/ Joseph A. ZirkmanName:

Joseph A. ZirkmanTitle:

Vice President/s/ Daniel T. AccordinoDaniel T. Accordino
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10873

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

ZACHARY MARSHALL ZIBA, 

 Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:15-CR-9-1

Before REAVLEY, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed, supported clearly by the 

law and evidence.

Defendant Zachary Ziba caused the Southwest flight from Denver to 

Dallas to divert and land at Amarillo. He refused to stay in his seat and obey 

the instructions of the veteran flight attendant. He was belligerent, shouting 

loudly with obscenity, and said people would be sorry and what the attendant 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 8, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10873 Document: 00513539837 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2016
No. 15-10873

2

reasonably understood to be threats to the safety of the aircraft and 

passengers.

Defendant was charged with the crime of intimidating a flight attendant 

to interfere with the performance of the attendant’s duties. 49 U.S.C.A. 

§ 46504. A jury found him guilty.

Defendant’s defense is that he did not knowingly interfere or intend to 

threaten. He argues that he was not guilty of either general or specific intent. 

He relies on Elonis v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2001 (2015) where the Court 

required specific intent to transmit in interstate commerce “any 

communication containing any threat ... to injure the person of another.” The 

mental state required there is not in the crime here. The Fifth Circuit has held 

that Art. 46504 is a crime of general intent where conduct can prove guilt.

United States v. Hicks, 980 F.2d 963 (5th Cir. 1992). This defendant was well 

aware of his conduct and talk, interfering with the crews and attendants and 

requiring the flight to be diverted.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-10873 Document: 00513539837 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2016
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly
Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (the “Report”),
I, John A Hardy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                              
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2012 |  | /s/ John A. Hardy                            
|                    |  | John A. Hardy
        Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00482-CR

Kurley James Johnson

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 89th District Court

of Wichita County (53,445-C)

April 16, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgments. It is ordered that the judgments

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
**Exhibit23.5**

** **

**DeGolyer and MacNaughton**

5001 Spring ValleyRoad

Suite 800 East

Dallas, Texas 75244

 

February 19, 2009

 

Nexen Inc.

801-7th Avenue S.W.

Calgary, Alberta  T2P 3P7

 

Board of Directors:

 

We hereby consent to referencesto DeGolyer and MacNaughton relating to our evaluation of certain oil and gasproperties of Nexen Inc. (Nexen) contained in the section entitled “Basis ofReserves Estimates” within “Reserves, Production and Related Information” asset out in Part I, Items 1&2 Business and Properties of Nexen’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 
|   | Very  truly yours,            |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                          |
|   | /s/  DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON |
|   |                          |
|   | DeGOLYER  and MacNAUGHTON     |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                         CHATTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
              FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  1996      1995      1994
                                                                ---------------------------
<S>                                                             <C>       <C>       <C>
NET INCOME (LOSS):
  Continuing operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $ 3,804   $ 2,325   $ 2,110
  Discontinued operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         --    10,008     1,500
  Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt, net. .       (532)     (367)   (1,556)
                                                                -------   -------   -------
     Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $ 3,272   $11,966   $ 2,054
                                                                -------   -------   -------
                                                                -------   -------   -------

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON AND
  COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING:
  Weighted number of common shares outstanding . . . . . . .      8,052     7,292     7,292
  Shares issued upon assumed exercise of outstanding
     stock options and warrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        101        --        --
                                                                -------   -------   -------
        Weighted average number of common and common
          equivalent shares outstanding. . . . . . . . . . .      8,153     7,292     7,292
                                                                -------   -------   -------
                                                                -------   -------   -------

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
  Continuing operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $   .47   $   .32   $   .29
  Discontinued operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         --      1.37       .21
  Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt, net. .       (.07)     (.05)     (.21)
                                                                -------   -------   -------
        Net income per common share. . . . . . . . . . . . .    $   .40   $  1.64   $   .29
                                                                -------   -------   -------
                                                                -------   -------   -------
</TABLE>
Order entered January 7 , 2020

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01430

- CV

IN RE BOBBY JOE EVEN S, R elat or

O rigi nal Proceeding from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 19

- 10082



### O RDER

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell

Bas e d on t he Cou r t’s opinion of this dat e , we DENY relator’s November 20, 2019

petition for writ of mandamus

.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
TELEPHONE CONTACT SUMMARY

Brick and Structural Clay P roducts

FROM : Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

DATE OF CONTACT: December 2, 2008

ORGANIZATION CONTACTED:

Boral Bricks Inc.

200 Mansell Court East Suite 305

Roswell, GA 30076

PERSON CONTACT ED:

Terry Schimmel

334

- 480

- 2488

PURPOSE OF CONTACT:

For information on the location of several brick plants.

SUMMARY OF CONTACT:

In their response to the Information Collection Request (ICR) f or the Brick and

Structural Clay Products Source Category, Bor al Bricks indicated that they had two

facilities in Augusta, GA, two facilities in Bessemer, AL, and three facilities in Phenix

City, AL. The ICR response was not clear if all of the plants located in one city were co

located or not. For example, in Augu sta

, Boral has Facility 2 and Facility 3

. Mr. Schimmel stated that the Facility 2 and Facility 3 in Augusta, GA , are not co

located; Facility 4 and Facility 5 in Bessemer, AL

, are not co

- located ; and Facility 14,

Facility 15, and Facility 16 in Phenix Ci ty, AL, are not co

- located

.
[ALTEON LETTERHEAD]




                                        October 21, 1997




Ms. Elizabeth A. O'Dell
100 Inwood Avenue
Upper Montclair, NJ 07043

Dear Liz:

This letter will confirm certain matters related to your employment
by Alteon Inc. (the "Company") and shall constitute an amendment to
your employment agreement with the Company dated October 21, 1995
(the "Employment Agreement"), and as amended by letter dated
January 29, 1997.

Your Term of Employment, as defined in Paragraph 1 of your
Employment Agreement, shall begin on the date hereof and terminate
3 years from such date.

Your salary for the calendar year 1997 will be $120,852 and it
shall be subject to further adjustment, as may be determined by the
Company, for periods thereafter.  In addition, you will be eligible
to receive a bonus, to be awarded at the sole discretion of the
Board of Directors of the Company, in an amount of up to $5,000 and
up to 10,000 stock options for the calendar year ending December
31, 1997.  You will also be eligible to receive bonuses for 1998
and 1999 in such amounts as may be determined by the Company.  The
vesting schedule and exercise price for bonus options will be
determined by the Company.

Subject to your acceptance of this letter, the Company shall award
you options to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company's common stock
at an exercise price of $5.625 (the fair market value of Alteon
stock on January 31, 1997, when the Compensation Committee of the
Board approved this award). The options will be subject to the
terms and conditions of the Company's amended 1995 Stock Option
Plan and the Company's standard Incentive/Non-Qualified Stock
Option Grant Agreement to be executed after action of the
Compensation Committee ("Grant Agreement").  The fifty thousand
(50,000) options will vest a rate of 1,388 per month during the
Term of Employment.  



<PAGE>

Ms. Elizabeth A. O'Dell
October 21, 1997
                                                          Page 2


Paragraph 20 of your Employment Agreement ("General") is amended to
include the Grant Agreement and this letter as part of the "entire
agreement," with respect to the subject matter of your employment
by the Company under these agreements. Except as modified by this
letter, the terms of your Employment Agreement, as previously
amended, shall remain in full force and effect.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your
agreement by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this
letter.


                                        Sincerely,

                                        /s/ James J. Mauzey

                                        James J. Mauzey
                                        Chairman and
                                        Chief Executive Officer





Accepted and Agreed:



/s/ Elizabeth A. O'Dell       
Elizabeth A. O'Dell



[ALTEON PAGE 2 LETTERHEAD]
#### In re Henry V. WOLENSKI, Appellant.

No. 14574.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 22, 1S63.

Decided Oct. 28, 1963.

Henry Y. Wolenski, pro se.

Domenic D. Jerome, Asst. Dist. Atty., Media, Pa., for appellee.

Before STALEY and GANEY, Circuit Judges, and NEALON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Henry V. Wolenski, presently confined in the Farview State Hospital in Way-mart, Pennsylvania, filed a petition in the district court requesting that the Orphans’ Court of Delaware County be ordered to issue a decree and opinion on Wolenski’s petition for removal of the guardian of his estate. The petitioner also requested that a lawyer be appointed to protect his interests. This appeal was taken from the order of the district •court denying the petition.

Treating the papers filed by the petitioner as requesting the district court to issue a writ of mandamus compelling-action by a state official, it is clear that the district court had no jurisdiction to grant such relief. Until recently only the District Court for the District of Columbia had original jurisdiction of an action in the nature of mandamus. Green v. United States, 283 F.2d 687 (C.A.3, 1960). In 1962 the Congress gave such jurisdiction to all Federal district courts, but only “to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.” 76 Stat. 744, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1361. Thus, the district court was without power to compel the Orphans’ Court to act in this matter.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.