alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL OP-OFA-097] 

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) 

Filed November 13, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through November 17, 2023 10 a.m. EST 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 

## Notice 

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxapps.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-II/​public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20230162, Final, USAF, FL,*                     KC-46A Main Operating Base No. 6 Beddown, Review Period Ends: 12/26/2023, Contact: Austin Naranjo 813-263-9331.                 

*EIS No. 20230163, Draft Supplement, USACE, HI,*                     Draft General Reevaluation Report with Integrated Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Ala Wai Canal Flood Risk Management Study, Oahu, Hawaii, Comment Period Ends: 01/08/2024, Contact: Eric Merriam 412-395-7185.                 

Dated: November 17, 2023. 

Julie Smith, 

Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2023-25936 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/10/2010 12:11 AM

-----

|------------>

| From: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|"Bromberg, Kevin L." <kevin.bromberg@sba.gov>

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| To: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>, "Kymn, Christine J."

<Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> |

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Cc: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael

Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA |

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Date: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|08/09/2010 02:12 PM

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Subject: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|SBA Comments August 9.doc

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

<<SBA Comments August 9.doc>> Comments on Redline Draft Preamble - for

discussion at some point.

Includes discussion of 4SLB MACT floor for Mike’s response, I would guess.

Pages 29-30: This does not explain why the Bricks decision caused this

change, and why EPA now believes it must include controlled engines in the

MACT floor.

Page 46: See comment above. Also, EPA should include why it believes that

commenters should have been on notice that controlled engines would be part of

the floor, when EPA clearly indicated that only uncontrolled engines would be

in the floor. There is not ONE WORD discussing the fact that EPA substituted

controlled engines for uncontrolled engines in this preamble, and that

industry spent up to one million dollars providing additional data solely

regarding uncontrolled engines at EPA’s request.

(See attached file: SBA Comments August 9.doc)
*The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-3137MN

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Leslie Kay Matter, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: March 11, 1999

Filed: March 18, 1999

_____________

Before FAGG and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges, and WEBBER,* District Judge.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Leslie Kay Matter appeals the district court's denial of her motions to suppress

drugs that were seized in a warrantless Nevada-based search of her luggage and in a

Minnesota warrant-based search of her residence. Having reviewed the record and

the parties' submissions, we conclude that an extensive discussion is not warranted

in this fact-intensive case. We are satisfied the district court's fact-findings are not

clearly erroneous and the district court correctly applied the controlling law. Finding

no error of fact or law by the district court, we affirm the denial of Matter's motions
-2-

to suppress on the basis of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation adopted

by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 82438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25893]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 24, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 17, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 15 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-57, CP2024-58.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-25893 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
April 5, 2

Mr. Dani

Mr. Paul 

Maine D

64 Maine

Post Offi

Montpeli

Dear Me

Enclosed

informati

based on

are the or

orders. T

State ord

Table 1 l

counties 

footnotes

percent o

three han

milkshed

milkshed

Dr. Corey

results on

require fu

Sincerely

Dana H. 

Deputy A

Dairy Pro

Enclosur

2011 

iel Smith 

Christ 

airy Industry

e Street, 

ice Box 801 

ier, Vermont

ssrs. Smith a

d is the inform

ion builds on

 handler pre

riginal Dece

These data ar

der separate f

lists, for each

that make up

s, counties in

of the milk p

ndlers. The d

d, the countie

ds, are also sh

y Freije of th

n behalf of D

urther assista

y, 

Coale 

Administrato

ograms 

res 

y Associatio

t 05601 

and Christ: 

mation requ

n an earlier r

sence and H

ember 2008 d

re pooled mi

from Federa

h milkshed, t

p 25 percent

n the Northw

roduction in

data for thes

es which ma

hown on the

he Upper Mi

Dairy Progra

ance please 

or

on 

ested in you

request from

Herfindahl-H

data collecte

ilk by county

l orders, data

the largest c

t of the milk 

west and Sou

n those areas

se counties a

ake up the re

e enclosed m

idwest Orde

ams. I hope 

contact Core

ur March 4, 2

m May 4, 200

irschmann In

ed by Federa

y listed acco

a for Califor

county-level 

pooled on a

uthwest that w

 would have

are restricted 

sults shown 

map. 

er staff in Mi

you find the

ey at 952-27

1400

Room

Wash

2011, letter, 

09, concernin

ndex numbe

al Order 30 f

ording to han

rnia are not p

Herfindahlany Federal o

would have 

e included so

d and omitted

in Table 1. 

inneapolis ha

ese data help

77-2355 or cf

 Independen

m 2968-S, ST

hington, DC 

a copy is en

ng competiti

ers. The data

from all 10 F

ndler. Since

part of either

Hirschmann

order. As in

comprised a

ome counties

d. Tables 2-

 These coun

as derived th

pful. If you h

freije@fmm

nce Avenue, 

TOP 0225 

 20250-0225

nclosed. Thi

ive price zon

a, as request

Federal milk 

e California i

r request. 

n Index for 

ndicated in th

at least 25 

s with fewer

8 list, for ea

nties, for all t

he milkshed 

have questio

ma30.com. 

SW. 

s 

nes 

ted, 

is a 

he 

r than 

ach 

the 

data 

ons or
#### Thelma B. STANTON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. James Lawrence STANTON, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 14268.

Supreme Court of Utah.

June 29, 1977.

D. Gary Christian, Kipp & Christian, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

Bryce E. Roe, Roe & Fowler, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

Hall, Justice:

Plaintiff challenges the May 5, 1977, 564 P.2d 303; opinion of this court by petition for rehearing.

A careful consideration of the points raised by the petition finds them to be without merit with one exception. The court did overlook the second award of costs by the United States Supreme Court in the amount of $100.00. Consequently, the prior opinion is amended to include the oversight and the total cost award is now $537.38.

We also adopt the concurring opinion and comments of Justice Crockett in the said May 5, 1977, opinion as part of the main opinion.

Except as so amended, the opinion stands and the petition for rehearing is denied.

ELLETT, C. J., and CROCKETT, J., concur.

WILKINS, Justice:

(dissenting and concurring).

I respectfully dissent in denying the petition for rehearing, but concur in awarding the costs in the amount of $100.00.

Although I concurred in the majority opinion of this Court, *Stanton v. Stanton,*No. 14268, 564 P.2d 303, filed on May 5, 1977, I believe that plaintiff’s petition for rehearing is meritorious and therefore should be granted.

We did not have the benefit of re-argument of this matter by counsel for the parties subsequent to this Court’s receiving the remand from the Supreme Court of the United States in *Stanton 2.**1***We should hear this re-argument. Counsel for plaintiff has raised thoughtful — if strongly stated- — points in the petition for rehearing, to which he and counsel for defendant should, I believe, have the opportunity to address themselves in the crucible of a court hearing where the adversary system obtains in order

> . to assure that concrete adverseness which sharpens the presentation of issues upon which the court so largely depends for illumination of difficult constitutional questions.2

1

. *Stanton v. Stanton,*429 U.S. 501, 97 S.Ct. 717, 50 L.Ed.2d 723 (1977).

2

. *Baker*v. *Carr,*369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663 (1962).

MAUGHAN, Justice:

(dissenting).

Owing to the difficulty we seem to have had with this matter, it is my view the Petition for Rehearing should be granted. I concur in the award of the $100 costs; and I join with that part of the dissenting and concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Wilkins, which counsels rehearing.

My reasons are stated in my dissent in *Stanton*v. *Stanton,*Utah, 552 P.2d 112, 116 (1976); and *Stanton*v. *Stanton,*Utah, No. 14268, 564 P.2d 303 (1977).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
                                      CODE)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of the registrant certifies, to the best of his or her
knowledge, that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Dated: August 9, 2004                /s/ Kenneth I. Moch
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Kenneth I. Moch
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 9, 2004                /s/ Elizabeth A. O'Dell
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Elizabeth A. O'Dell
                                     Vice President, Finance
                                     Secretary and Treasurer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-51019

Summary Calendar

HERMINIA S. ALEMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

WEST BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:13-CV-994

Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Herminia S. Aleman, proceeding pro se in the district 

court and in this appeal, asks us to reverse the district court’s denial of her 

Motion for Summary Judgment and that court’s summary judgment in favor 

or Defendant-Appellee West Business Solutions, L.L.C. (“West”). We affirm.

Aleman asserted two claims of discrimination: (1) Age discrimination in 

terminating her participation in a training program for missing one full day 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-51019 Document: 00513007877 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2015
No. 14-51019

and (2) retaliation for her alleged interest, participation, or encouragement of

her daughter’s previous employment discrimination claim against West. 

Following the filing of cross motions for summary judgment, the district court 

painstakingly explained the law applicable to the facts alleged by Aleman and 

by West and explained Aleman’s failure to allege facts sufficient to constitute 

a prima facie case of age discrimination or retaliation. The court also 

addressed the non-discriminatory reasons advanced by West for its actions,

which Aleman failed to rebut. For essentially the same reasons patiently and 

clearly set forth in the district court’s August 8, 2014 Order Regarding CrossMotions for Summary Judgment, that court’s Judgment of even date in favor 

of West is, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-51019 Document: 00513007877 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors Meeting.

# TIME AND DATE: 

The meeting will be held on January 14, 2013, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Central Daylight Time.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will take place at the Hyatt French Quarter; 800 Iberville Street, New Orleans, LA 70112.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to that end, may consider matters properly before the Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

Issued on: December 28, 2012.

Larry W. Minor,

Associate Administrator, Office of Policy, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.

[FR Doc. 2013-00314 Filed 1-7-13; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the followingRegistration Statements of Nexen Inc.:

 

·                  RegistrationStatement No.’s 033-26582, 033-34467, 033-43426, 033-66538, 033-81334,333-05494, 333-07344, 333-09286, 333-13574, 333-118019 and 333-119276 on Form S-8;

 

·                  RegistrationStatement No.’s 333-09288, 333-10646, 333-84786, 333-142652 and 333-142670 on Form F-3;and

 

·                  RegistrationStatement No.’s 333-128510, 333-143380 and 333-159551 on Form F-10.

 

of our reports dated February 17, 2010, relating to the financialstatements of Nexen Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on thefinancial statements and includes a separate report on Canada-United States ofAmerica reporting difference) and the effectiveness of Nexen Inc.’s internalcontrol over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Nexen Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

 
| (signed) “Deloitte & Touche LLP” |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                |
| Independent Registered Chartered Accountants        |
| Calgary, Canada                                     |
|                                                |
| February 25, 2010                              |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/Northern Trust Collective Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randal Rein, as Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Randal ReinRandal Rein Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer November 15, 2010
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          SEP-30-2001
[PERIOD-END]                               SEP-30-2000
[CASH]                                               0
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                     4434
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                     0
[PP&E]                                               0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                       0
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                            69000
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                      16000
[COMMON]                                       (80566)
[OTHER-SE]                                     (64566)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                         0
[SALES]                                           3800
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     0
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                  3000
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                 800
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                      0
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                          800
[NET-INCOME]                                         0
[EPS-BASIC]                                          0
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>