alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.25

                      AMENDMENT #2 TO OFFICE BUILDING LEASE
                               DATED JUNE 29, 1999
                                 BY AND BETWEEN
    UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR AGNES M. BOURN AND WILLIAM
                             B. BOURN ("LANDLORD")
                                       AND
         FIRST SOURCE CAPITAL, WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF AMERICAN RIVER
                              HOLDINGS ("TENANT").


This Addendum is hereby made a part of that certain Office Building lease
between the above-mentioned parties dated June 29, 1999 (the "Contract"). Said
document shall hereby be amended as follows. In the event of any discrepancy
between this document and any previous document(s) the provisions of this
document shall prevail.


2.d.   COMMENCEMENT DATE:    February 15, 2002

2.g.   EXPIRATION DATE:      February 14, 2003

2.j.   MONTHLY BASE RENT:    February 15, 2002 to February 14, 2003 @ $1,270.50

CONSULT YOUR ADVISORS - This document (including its exhibits and addendums, if
any) has been prepared by Broker for approval by the undersigned respective
parties legal counsel. Broker makes no representation or recommendation as to
the legal sufficiency or tax consequences of this document or the transaction to
which it relates. These are questions for an attorney or accountant.

THE ABOVE TERMS ARE ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:

LANDLORD                                   TENANT


Union Bank of California, N.A., as         First Source Capital, wholly owned
trustee for Agnes M. Bourn and             Subsidiary of American River Holdings
William B. Bourn Trust                     Corporation

By:    /s/ BRIAN T. MULLINS                By:    /s/ DAVID T. TABER
   ---------------------------------          ----------------------------------
Brian T. Mullins, Vice President

Its:   Vice President                      Its:   President
                                               ---------------------------------


Date:  3/20/02                             Date:  3/7/02
     -------------------------------            --------------------------------

                                       28
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6975

DERRICK LAMAR CHEEKS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. ALFORD JOYNER , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Donald C. Coggins, Jr. , District Judge. ( 0:17

- cv - 02876

- DCC )

Submitted : March 9, 2022 Decided: March 22, 2022

Before WYNN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Derrick Lamar Cheeks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Derrick Lamar Cheeks seeks to appeal the di strict court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district court’s prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabi lity. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

. See generally United States v.
McRae , 793 F.3d 392, 400 & n.7 (4th Cir. 2015) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) . When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 7 59, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cheeks has not made the requisite showing. * Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

* We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Cheeks’ recusal motion. See Liteky v. United States , 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994) ; United States v. Stone , 866 F.3d 219, 229 (4th Cir. 2017).3 adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
# C_2016202EN.01033701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/337 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/337

---

5.   Declaration on the political agreement by the European Council concerning the draft Decision on the composition of the European Parliament

Declaration on the political agreement by the European Council concerning the draft Decision on the composition of the European Parliament

The European Council will give its political agreement on the revised draft Decision on the composition of the European Parliament for the legislative period 2009-2014, based on the proposal from the European Parliament.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HomePatient, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marilyn O'Hara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


This Certification is executed as of August 14, 2003.


                                        /s/ Marilyn O'Hara
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Marilyn O'Hara
                                        Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-58,309-06

IN RE STEVEN HENRY YOUNG, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1296511-B IN THE 174TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant

to the original jurisdiction of this Court. Relator filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in

the 174th District Court of Harris County on May 1, 2015. The District Court entered a timely order

designating issues. More than 180 days has passed since the date the State received the application

on May 4, 2015, and the application has not been timely forwarded to this Court as mandated by

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 73.4(b)(5). 

Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris County, is ordered to file a response, which may be

made by submitting the record on such habeas corpus application, submitting proof of the date of
receipt by the State showing 180 days has not yet elapsed, or stating that Relator has not filed an

application for a writ of habeas corpus in Harris County. This application for leave to file a writ of

mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such

response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: September 28, 2016

Do not publish
EXHIBIT 24.2
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

The  undersigned,  as Executive  Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer of
Central  and  South  West   Corporation  (the   "Corporation"),   hereby  makes,
constitutes and appoints E. R. Brooks and Lawrence B. Connors,  and each of them
severally,  his true and lawful  attorneys-in-fact  and  agents,  each with full
power and authority (acting alone and without the others) to execute in the name
and on behalf of the undersigned,  in any and all capacities,  the Corporation's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1999 and any and all  amendments  thereto,  to be
filed under the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as  amended,  and any other
documents and  instruments  incidental  thereto,  and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, hereby granting to such attorneys-in-fact,  and agents,
and each of them, full power and authority of substitution and revocation in the
premises  and full power and  authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully for
all intents  and  purposes  as the  undersigned  might or could do in person and
hereby ratifying and confirming all that such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, or
any of them, may do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have hereunto  executed this Power of Attorney this 19th
day of January, 2000.


                                                /s/ Glenn D. Rosilier
                                                Glenn D. Rosilier
                                                Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer


Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of January, 2000.



                                                /s/ Judy A. Hall
                                                Notary Public
                                                State of Texas


      My Commission Expires:  July 20, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                       CAPSTEAD SECURITIES CORPORATION IV
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capstead Securities Corporation IV
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Andrew F. Jacobs, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date:  August 12, 2002                     By:  /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBS
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Andrew F. Jacobs
                                              Chairman and Chief Executive
                                              Officer and President



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capstead Securities Corporation IV
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Phillip A. Reinsch, Senior Vice President - Control of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date:  August 12, 2002                     By:  /s/ PHILLIP A.REINSCH
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Phillip A. Reinsch
                                              Senior Vice President - Control
**Exhibit 31.3**
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS**
I, David G. Peek, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Goody’sFamily Clothing, Inc., certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Goody’s FamilyClothing, Inc. (the “registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting         By:       /s/ DAVID G. PEEK    David G. Peek    *Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer*   
August 19, 2004
20
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE II

FREEDOMS

FREEDOMS

Article 13

Freedom of the arts and sciences

The arts and scientific research shall be free of constraint. Academic freedom shall be respected.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 946 

To make loans and loan guarantees under section 502 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 available for implementing 

positive train control systems, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York (for himself and Mr. PETERSON) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To make loans and loan guarantees under section 502 of 

the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act 

of 1976 available for implementing positive train control 

systems, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commuter Rail Pas5 senger Safety Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 946 IH

1 SEC. 2. POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL SYSTEMS. 

2 Section 502(b)(1) of the Railroad Revitalization and 

3 Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (45 U.S.C. 822(b)(1)), 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘or’’; 

6 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘facili7 ties.’’ and inserting ‘‘facilities; or’’; and 

8 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(D) implement a positive train control 

10 system, as required by section 20157 of title 

11 49, United States Code.’’. 

12 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF RAILROAD SAFETY TECHNOLOGY 

13 GRANTS. 

14 Section 20158(c) of title 49, United States Code, is 

15 amended— 

16 (1) by striking ‘‘$50,000,000’’ and inserting 

17 ‘‘$100,000,000’’; and 

18 (2) by striking ‘‘2009 through 2013’’ and in19 serting ‘‘2016 through 2020’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 21996A0127(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 21996A0127(01)

**International Grains Agreement, 1995 - Grains Trade Convention, 1995 - Food Aid Convention, 1995 **

*
Official Journal L 021 , 27/01/1996 P. 0049 - 0065 *

INTERNATIONAL GRAINS AGREEMENT, 1995

PREAMBLE

THE SIGNATORIES TO THIS AGREEMENT

Considering that the International Wheat Agreement, 1949 was revised, renewed, updated or extended on successive occasions leading to the conclusion of the International Wheat Agreement, 1986,

Considering that the provisions of the International Wheat Agreement, 1986, consisting of the Wheat Trade Convention, 1986, on the one hand, and the Food Aid Convention, 1986, on the other, as extended, will expire on 30 June 1995, and that it is desirable to conclude an agreement for a new period,

HAVE AGREED

that the International Wheat Agreement, 1986 shall be updated and renamed the International Grains Agreement, 1995, which shall consist of two separate legal instruments:

(a) the Grains Trade Convention, 1995 and

(b) the Food Aid Convention, 1995,

and that each of these two Conventions, or either of them as appropriate, shall be submitted for signature and ratification, acceptance or approval, in conformity with their respective constitutional or institutional procedures, by the Governments concerned.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Vinod Gupta, certify that:
1.I have reviewed amendment no. 1 to this quarterly report on Form10-Q/A of *info*USA Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: August 10, 2004    */s/ Vinod Gupta*  Vinod Gupta Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                                     ISOCOR
        STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF SHARES USED IN PER SHARE COMPUTATION
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three months ended              Nine months ended
                                                 -------------------------       -------------------------
                                                 September       September       September       September
                                                 30, 1997        30, 1996        30, 1997        30, 1996
                                                 ---------       ---------       ---------       ---------
<S>                                              <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>  

Computation of shares used in net income
 (loss) per share:
Weighted average common shares
 outstanding ................................      9,429           9,271           9,405           6,789
Common equivalent shares attributable to
 stock options (treasury stock method) ......                      1,181                           1,158
Common equivalent shares attributable to
 redeemable preferred stock..................
                                                   -----          ------           -----           -----
Shares used in per share calculation ........      9,429          10,452           9,405           7,947
                                                   =====          ======           =====           =====
</TABLE>








                                       1