alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 22004D0021 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22004D0021

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 21/2004 of 19 March 2004 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 127 , 29/04/2004 P. 0126 - 0126 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 21/2004

of 19 March 2004

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 171/2003 of 5 December 2003(1).

(2) Commission Directive 2003/95/EC of 27 October 2003 amending Directive 96/77/EC laying down specific purity criteria on food additives other than colours and sweeteners(2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 54zf (Commission Directive 96/77/EC) of Chapter XII of Annex II to the Agreement:

"- 32003 L 0095: Commission Directive 2003/95/EC of 27 October 2003 (OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p. 71)."

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2003/95/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 20 March 2004, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(3).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 19 March 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

P. Westerlund

(1) OJ L 88, 25.3.2004, p. 43.

(2) OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p. 71.

(3) No constitutional requirements indicated.
EXHIBIT 11.1

           SUNRISE INTERANATIONAL LEASING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         PER SHARE EARNINGS COMPUTATIONS

                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                    June 30, 1998
                                               1998              1997
                                            ----------        ----------

Basic Earnings Per Share:

   Weighted average number of
     common shares outstanding               7,804,000         7,291,000
                                            ==========        ==========

       Net income                           $  699,000        $  877,000
                                            ==========        ==========
       Net income per common and
         common equivalent share            $     0.09        $     0.12
                                            ==========        ==========

Fully Dilutive Earnings Per Share:

   Weighted average number of                7,804,000        7, 291,000
   Common stock equivalents
     from assumed exercise of
     options and warrants                       36,000              --
                                            ----------        ----------
       Total shares                          7,840,000         7,291,000
                                            ==========        ==========

       Net income                           $  699,000        $  877,000
                                            ==========        ==========

       Net income per common
         and common equivalent share        $     0.09        $     0.12
                                            ==========        ==========

Net income per common and common equivalent share is computed using the weighted
average number of shares outstanding during each period.
* Pursuant t o Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 95-50673 Summary Calendar

_____________

REBECCA BUSH Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY

OF RHODE ISLAND,

CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,
KIRK LINDEMANN, and

SUSAN KING Defendants-Appellants

____________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas
(SA-95-CV-321)

_____________________________

July 15, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Because the district court’s decision appears to be in conflict with this court’s recent decision

in Patin v. Allied Signal, Inc.

, 77 F.3d 782 (5th Cir. 1996) and because the P atin opinion was

unavailable to the district court when it considered this case, the district court’s judgment is vacated

and the case is remanded to that court for its reconsideration in the light of our recent Patin decision

and, if necessary, for its consideration of the additional issues pretermitted by its original decision.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
<PAGE>



                                                                 Exhibit 15.1





American HomePatient, Inc.
Brentwood, TN


Re: Registration Statements No. 333-56313 and No. 333-56317


With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated May 4, 2006 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is
not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


/s/ KPMG LLP


May 4, 2006
Nashville, Tennessee
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82438-82439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25891]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 24, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

[[Page 82439]]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 15, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 13 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-52, CP2024-53.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-25891 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
#### IN RE CHRISTOPHER L. ET AL.*

(AC 19723)

Landau, Zarella and O’Connell, Js.

Argued March 21

officially released June 20, 2000

*381*Maureen E. Donahue,*for the appellant (respondent mother).

*Maureen D. Regula,*assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, *were Richard Blumenthal,*attorney general, and *Susan T. Pearlman,*assistant attorney general, for the appellee (petitioner).

*Thomas S. Becker,*for the minor children.

*

 In accordance with the spirit and intent of General Statutes § 46b-142 (b) and Practice Book § 79-3, the names of the parties involved in this appeal are not disclosed. The records and papers of this case shall be open for inspection only to persons having a proper interest therein and upon order of the Appellate Court.

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

The respondent mother1 appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her three minor children. She challenges the court’s determination that the petitioner, the commissioner of children and families, proved by clear and convincing evidence (1) that the children had been denied, by reason of an act or acts of parental commission or omission, the care, guidance, or control necessary for the children’s physical, educational, moral or emotional well-being, (2) that the respondent had failed to achieve such degree of personal rehabilitation as would encourage the belief that within a reasonable time, considering the age and needs of the children, she could assume a responsible position in the lives of the children, and (3) that termination of the respondent’s parental lights would be in the best interests of the children.

Our examination of the record and briefs and consideration of the arguments of the parties persuades us that the judgment of the court should be affirmed. The court issued a memorandum of decision setting forth *382detailed findings of fact. “It is well established that an appellate court cannot retry the facts. Our review is limited to determining whether the court’s judgment was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” *In re Martin K.,*56 Conn. App. 10, 11, 741 A.2d 10 (1999); see also *In re Luis C.,*210 Conn. 157, 169, 554 A.2d 722 (1989). We, therefore, will not disturb the court’s factual findings, as they are not clearly erroneous.

Additionally, the court properly considered the relevant case law and weighed the factors enumerated in the statutes, and we therefore find the court’s conclusions fully supported by the record. *In re Felicia D.,*35 Conn. App. 490, 504, 646 A.2d 862, cert. denied, 231 Conn. 931, 649 A.2d 253 (1994).

The judgments are affirmed.

1

 The court terminated the parental rights of the respondent mother, who participated in the termination proceedings, and two putative fathers, who did not appear at trial. Only the respondent mother has appealed. We refer to her as the respondent in this opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 864 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 864

  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
    individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of sexual 
                    orientation or gender identity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2015

  Mrs. Davis of California (for herself and Mr. Pocan) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
    individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of sexual 
                    orientation or gender identity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Juror Non-Discrimination Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM FEDERAL JURIES ON ACCOUNT OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION 
              OR GENDER IDENTITY PROHIBITED.

    Section 1862 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``sexual orientation, gender identity,'' after ``sex''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Bureau of National Affairs,Inc. consolidated balance sheet and consolidated
statement of income for the period ended December 31, 1995 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          17,763
<SECURITIES>                                    11,123
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,628
<INVENTORY>                                      6,268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,929
<PP&E>                                         112,249
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,924
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        11,912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,752
<SALES>                                        226,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,497
<CGS>                                          128,671
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                89,957
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   860
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  95
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,578
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,487
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,091
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,091
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2



|FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |  | CONTACT: |  | Nolan Lehmann 
|--------------------- |  | -------- |  | --------------
|                      |  |          |  | (713) 529-0900

|
|



EQUUS II
INCORPORATED DECLARES

NET INVESTMENT INCOME DIVIDEND FOR 2003



HOUSTON, TXNovember 5, 2003Equus II Incorporated (NYSE: EQS) announced today a dividend of its net investment
income for the year 2003, currently estimated to be $0.72 per share. The dividend will be payable on or before January 16, 2004, to shareholders of record as of November 30, 2003. Shares of EQS will trade ex-dividend beginning November 26, 2003. The
dividend will be payable in shares of common stock of EQS or in cash by specific election. Such election must be made by shareholders prior to December 30, 2003. If no election is made, shareholders will receive stock. The stock issued in the
dividend will be valued at the average closing market price of EQS for the ten trading days ending December 30, 2003. Cash will be paid in lieu of issuing any fractional shares.



Based on our current understanding, it is estimated that over 75% of the dividend will qualify for the 15% rate of tax imposed on certain
dividends pursuant to the 2003 Tax Act. The balance will be taxable to the shareholders as ordinary income. The dividend will be reportable by EQS shareholders on their 2003 U.S. Federal Income Tax Return, whether it is taken in additional shares of
common stock or in cash.



Sam P. Douglass, Chairman of Equus, commented,
We are pleased to announce our first annual dividend since 2000, due to the performance of our portfolio companies in the gradually recovering economy. We are also pleased to announce that the majority of the dividend will qualify for lower
tax rates established by the 2003 Tax Act.



Equus II is a business
development company and seeks to generate current distributions of investment income and long-term capital gains by making equity investments in small to medium-sized privately owned companies. The current portfolio consists of 18 businesses in
various industries and two venture capital funds.



Information on Equus II
Incorporated and other Equus entities may be obtained on the Internet. Our home page address is www.equuscap.com.



Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This press release contains statements relating to future results of the Fund (including certain projections and business trends) that are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including those that are more fully set forth in the Funds Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.



# # #
In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

APRIL 21, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED100709 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V EDDIE BROWN, APP

2. ED100793 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V EVRICK BROWN, APP

3. ED101005 STATE OF MO, RES V. ANTHONY FINERSON, APP

4. ED101094 LARRY BETZEL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

5. ED101146 COREY T. BUCKLEY, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

6. ED101442 BARRY A. YARDLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

7. ED101500 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V. DALE M. WRIGHT, APP
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I, Michael S. Sarner, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:
 
 1The Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2020, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 2, 2020 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.
 
 Date:  June 2, 2020By:/s/ Michael S. SarnerMichael S. SarnerChief Financial Officer
# C_2016202EN.01010401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/104 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/104

---

Article 130

(ex Article 108 TEC)

(ex Article 108 TEC)

When exercising the powers and carrying out the tasks and duties conferred upon them by the Treaties and the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB, neither the European Central Bank, nor a national central bank, nor any member of their decision-making bodies shall seek or take instructions from Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, from any government of a Member State or from any other body. The Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies and the governments of the Member States undertake to respect this principle and not to seek to influence the members of the decision-making bodies of the European Central Bank or of the national central banks in the performance of their tasks.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT (10)(q)

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$600,000                                                DATED: JANUARY 23, 2002

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, IRA D. KAPLAN AND CELINA T. KAPLAN (THE
"BORROWERS"), A MARRIED COUPLE RESIDING AT 10221 S.W. 15TH STREET, PEMBROKE
PINES, FLORIDA 33025, PROMISE TO PAY TO THE ORDER OF CLAIRE'S STORES, INC., A
FLORIDA CORPORATION (THE "PAYEE"), AT THE OFFICES OF THE PAYEE LOCATED AT 3 S.W.
129TH AVENUE, PEMBROKE PINES, FLORIDA 33027, OR AT SUCH OTHER PLACE AS THE PAYEE
MAY SPECIFY FROM TIME TO TIME, IN LAWFUL MONEY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
THE PRINCIPAL SUM OF SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($600,000) PLUS
INTEREST ON DEMAND. THE UNPAID BALANCE OF THIS NOTE SHALL, UNTIL PAID IN FULL,
BEAR INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 2.71% PER ANNUM. INTEREST, IF ANY, SHALL BE
CALCULATED ON THE BASIS OF A 360-DAY YEAR AND A YEAR CONSISTING OF TWELVE 30-DAY
MONTHS.

         THE BORROWERS MAY, AT THEIR OPTION, AT ANY TIME AND FROM TIME TO TIME,
PREPAY ALL OR ANY PART OF THE PRINCIPAL BALANCE OF THIS NOTE, WITHOUT PENALTY OR
PREMIUM. UPON FINAL PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ON THIS NOTE, IT SHALL
BE SURRENDERED TO THE BORROWERS FOR CANCELLATION.

         PRESENTMENT FOR PAYMENT, DEMAND, NOTICE OF DISHONOR, PROTEST, NOTICE OF
PROTEST AND ALL OTHER DEMANDS AND NOTICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE DELIVERY,
PERFORMANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OF THIS NOTE ARE HEREBY WAIVED.

         THIS NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY CHOICE
OF LAW PROVISIONS.

         THE BORROWERS HEREBY KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY AND INTENTIONALLY WAIVE (TO
THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW) ANY RIGHT THEY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY
JURY OF ANY DISPUTE ARISING UNDER OR RELATING TO THIS NOTE AND AGREE THAT ANY
SUCH DISPUTE SHALL, AT THE OPTION OF THE PAYEE, BE TRIED BEFORE A JUDGE SITTING
WITHOUT A JURY.



                                          -------------------------------------
                                          IRA D. KAPLAN



                                          -------------------------------------
                                          CELINA T. KAPLAN