alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
 
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
                     PATRIOT AMERICAN HOSPITALITY, INC. AND
                          WYNDHAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                                 (in thousands)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Year       Year     Year   Inception
                                           Ended     Ended    Ended    Through
                                         12/31/98   12/31/97 12/31/96 12/31/95
                                         ---------  -------- -------- ---------
<S>                                      <C>        <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings:
 Income before minority interest........  (112,508) $ 4,142  $44,813   $7,064
 Add back: fixed charges................   272,215   53,093    7,471       89
                                         ---------  -------  -------   ------
                                         $ 159,707  $57,235  $52,284   $7,153
                                         =========  =======  =======   ======
Fixed Charges:
 Interest expense, including
  amortization of deferred loan costs...   260,103  $50,531  $ 7,380   $   89
 Capitalized interest...................    12,112    2,562       91      --
                                         ---------  -------  -------   ------
                                         $ 272,215  $53,093  $ 7,471   $   89
                                         =========  =======  =======   ======
Ratio:                                        0.59     1.08     7.00    80.37
                                         =========  =======  =======   ======
</TABLE>
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE II

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 4

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUDGET AND DISCHARGE

Article 319

(ex Article 276 TEC)

(ex Article 276 TEC)

1.   The European Parliament, acting on a recommendation from the Council, shall give a discharge to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the budget. To this end, the Council and the European Parliament in turn shall examine the accounts, the financial statement and the evaluation report referred to in Article 318, the annual report by the Court of Auditors together with the replies of the institutions under audit to the observations of the Court of Auditors, the statement of assurance referred to in Article 287(1), second subparagraph and any relevant special reports by the Court of Auditors.

2.   Before giving a discharge to the Commission, or for any other purpose in connection with the exercise of its powers over the implementation of the budget, the European Parliament may ask to hear the Commission give evidence with regard to the execution of expenditure or the operation of financial control systems. The Commission shall submit any necessary information to the European Parliament at the latter's request.

3.   The Commission shall take all appropriate steps to act on the observations in the decisions giving discharge and on other observations by the European Parliament relating to the execution of expenditure, as well as on comments accompanying the recommendations on discharge adopted by the Council.

At the request of the European Parliament or the Council, the Commission shall report on the measures taken in the light of these observations and comments and in particular on the instructions given to the departments which are responsible for the implementation of the budget. These reports shall also be forwarded to the Court of Auditors.

---
# C_2016202EN.01008501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/85 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/85

---

Article 91

(ex Article 71 TEC)

(ex Article 71 TEC)

1.   For the purpose of implementing Article 90, and taking into account the distinctive features of transport, the European Parliament and the Council shall, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, lay down:

| (a) | common rules applicable to international transport to or from the territory of a Member State or passing across the territory of one or more Member States; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

common rules applicable to international transport to or from the territory of a Member State or passing across the territory of one or more Member States;

| (b) | the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate transport services within a Member State; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate transport services within a Member State;

| (c) | measures to improve transport safety; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

measures to improve transport safety;

| (d) | any other appropriate provisions. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

any other appropriate provisions.

2.   When the measures referred to in paragraph 1 are adopted, account shall be taken of cases where their application might seriously affect the standard of living and level of employment in certain regions, and the operation of transport facilities.

---
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE VII

GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER

GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER

Article 51

Field of application

1.   The provisions of this Charter are addressed to the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law. They shall therefore respect the rights, observe the principles and promote the application thereof in accordance with their respective powers and respecting the limits of the powers of the Union as conferred on it in the Treaties.

2.   The Charter does not extend the field of application of Union law beyond the powers of the Union or establish any new power or task for the Union, or modify powers and tasks as defined in the Treaties.

---
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0001319

16-APR-2015

10:00 AM
103-/5"

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 05-14-01453-CR

Jimmy Charles Johnson v. The

STYLE: State of Texas

COA DISPOSITION: DISM

OFFENSE: 19.02

COUNTY: Dallas

TRIAL COURT: 292nd Judicial District Court

DATE: 11/18/2014 Publish: NO TCCASE#: F95-72894-HV

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Jimmy Charles Johnson v. The State

STYLE: of Texas

PRO ££ Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE:

JUDGE:

_£,?///ZVLT

iiUi^M^^—

CCA#: 103-1S*

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:.

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1430 

To provide that chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code, relating 

to the enforcement of arbitration agreements, shall not apply to enrollment agreements made between students and certain institutions of higher education; and to prohibit limitations on the ability of students to 

pursue claims against certain institutions of higher education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2019 

Ms. WATERS (for herself, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. 

COHEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee on the 

Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States 

Code, relating to the enforcement of arbitration agreements, shall not apply to enrollment agreements made 

between students and certain institutions of higher education; and to prohibit limitations on the ability of students to pursue claims against certain institutions of 

higher education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1430 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Court Legal Access 

3 and Student Support (CLASS) Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INAPPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE 9, 

5 UNITED STATES CODE, TO ENROLLMENT 

6 AGREEMENTS MADE BETWEEN STUDENTS 

7 AND CERTAIN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER 

8 EDUCATION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 9 of the United 

10 States Code (relating to the enforcement of arbitration 

11 agreements) shall not apply to an enrollment agreement 

12 made between a student and an institution of higher edu13 cation. 

14 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the 

15 term ‘‘institution of higher education’’ has the meaning 

16 given such term in section 102 of the Higher Education 

17 Act of 1965. 

18 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON LIMITATIONS ON ABILITY OF STU19 DENTS TO PURSUE CLAIMS AGAINST CER20 TAIN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION. 

21 Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

22 (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

23 following new paragraph: 

24 ‘‘(30) The institution will not require any stu25 dent to agree to, and will not enforce, any limitation 

26 or restriction (including a limitation or restriction on 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1430 IH

1 any available choice of applicable law, a jury trial, 

2 or venue) on the ability of a student to pursue a 

3 claim, individually or with others, against an institu4 tion in court.’’. 

5 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

6 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

7 take effect 1 year after the date of the enactment of this 

8 Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### DEVINE v. SANFORD, Warden.

No. 9145.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1939.

Louis S. Devine, in pro. per.

Lawrence S. Camp, U. S. Atty., and James T. Manning, Harvey H. Tisinger, *27and J. Ellis Mundy, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before SIBLEY, HUTCHESON, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In the trial before the District Judge the testimony of the applicant for the writ of habeas corpus was contradicted throughout by witnesses for the respondent. In believing the latter, the District Judge committed no reversible error.

Affirmed.
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 65 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States giving 

Congress power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the 

United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2019 

Mr. WOMACK (for himself, Mr. BANKS, Mr. BYRNE, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. 

FORTENBERRY, Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, 

Mr. LATTA, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, Mr. 

NEWHOUSE, Mr. OLSON, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee, 

and Mr. ROUZER) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States giving Congress power to prohibit the physical 

desecration of the flag of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 65 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘The Congress shall have power to prohibit the phys5 ical desecration of the flag of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1492 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1492

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To update the map of, and modify the maximum acreage available for 
            inclusion in, the Yucca House National Monument.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Yucca House National Monument 
Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) National monument.--The term ``National Monument'' 
        means the Yucca House National Monument in Cortez, Colorado, 
        established by Presidential Proclamation 1549.
            (2) Map.--The term ``map'' means the map entitled ``Yucca 
        House National Monument Proposed Boundary Addition'', numbered 
        318/105,085A, and dated February 27, 2019.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. YUCCA HOUSE NATIONAL MONUMENT LAND ACQUISITION.

    (a) Acquisition.--The Secretary may acquire by donation the 
approximately 160 acres of land and any interests in the land that is 
identified on the map.
    (b) Boundary.--On the acquisition of the land authorized under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall adjust the boundaries of the 
National Monument to include the acquired land.
    (c) Administration.--The land and any interests in land acquired 
under subsection (a) shall be administered as part of the National 
Monument.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 26, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1492

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To update the map of, and modify the maximum acreage available for 
            inclusion in, the Yucca House National Monument.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    OF PERIODIC REPORT**     I, John P. D. Cato, Chairman, President and Chief Executive    Officer of The Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this    Certification:     1.     the Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of the Company for the annual period ended February 3, 2007    (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     Dated: April 3, 2007 /s/  John    P. D. Cato    John P. D. Cato    Chairman, President and    Chief Executive Officer
ST ST N_t o
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of FAO, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending August 2, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry R. Welch, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  September 15, 2003 |                                   | /s/  Jerry R. Welch |   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|                           | Jerry  R. Welch                        |                |
|                           | Chief  Executive Officer and President |                |

 

----
# C_2016202EN.01013901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/139 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/139

---

Article 204

(ex Article 188 TEC)

(ex Article 188 TEC)

The provisions of Articles 198 to 203 shall apply to Greenland, subject to the specific provisions for Greenland set out in the Protocol on special arrangements for Greenland, annexed to the Treaties.

---
EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                          -----------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements:

     o    Registration Statement No.'s 033-26582, 033-34467, 033-43426,
          033-66538, 033-81334, 333-05494, 333-07344, 333-09286 and 333-13574 on
          Form S-8;

     o    Registration Statement No.'s 333-09288, 333-10646 and 333-84786 on
          Form F-3; and

     o    Registration Statement No.'s 333-08142, 333-09542, 333-09856 and
          333-88254 on Form F-9

of our report dated January 23, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the reclassification
of certain amounts to give effect to a change in generally accepted accounting
principles in 2002), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nexen Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2002.

(signed) "Deloitte & Touche LLP"

Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

February 24, 2003
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00206-CV

IN RE Tamer F. MORSI

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 8, 2015, relator Tamer Morsi filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining 

of the trial court’s order requiring relator to execute consent forms to allow his ex-wife to obtain 

passports for their minor children. The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus 

and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for 

writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CI-15236, styled In the Interest of E.M., G.M. and L.M., Children, 

pending in the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Renee Yanta presiding.
United States

Department of

Agriculture

Agricultural 

Marketing

Service

Fruit and

Vegetable

Programs

Fresh

Products

Branch

United States Standards

for Grades of

Parsley

Effective July 20, 2007
1 Packing of the product in conformity with the requirements of these standards shall not excuse failure to

comply with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or with applicable State laws and

regulations.

1

United States Standards for Grades of Parsley1

General 

51.4000 General

Grade 

51.4001 U.S. No. 1.

Reserved

51.4002 Reserved.

Definitions 

51.4003 Similar varietal characteristics.

51.4004 Damage.

General

§51.4000 General. 

These standards do not apply to parsley tops marketed with a part of the entire root attached.

Grade

§51.4001 U.S. No. 1. 

“U.S. No. 1” consists of parsley of similar varietal characteristics and of good green color; which

is free from decay, and from damage caused by seedstems, yellow or discolored leaves, wilting,

freezing, dirt, or other foreign material, disease, insects, or mechanical or other means. 

(a) Tolerances. In order to allow for variations incident to proper grading and handling, not

more than 5 percent, by count, of the parsley in any lot may be below the requirements of this

grade, including therein not more than one-half of 1 percent for parsley which is affected by

decay. 

Reserved

§51.4002 Reserved. 

Definitions 

§51.4003 Similar varietal characteristics. 

“Similar varietal characteristics” means that the parsley is all of the same general type. For

example, the curly leaf type shall not be mixed with the flat leaf type. 

§51.4004 Damage. 

“Damage” means any defect, or any combination of defects, which materially detracts from the

appearance, or the edible or marketing quality of the parsley.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00651-CR

Gregorio Ortiz GARZA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR10604

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 24, 2013.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 21

- 00003

- CV

___________________________

Origin al Proceeding

County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- 007958

- 1

Before Walker, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### A DRIANO 

### B UDRI 

### , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : January 8, 2021
Gu.s~ JCJtJ,t ttJzt9-Z028lJ- c!JV-//C~ 

pP.() WA..- ~2 P~ -a-

~~cl/ 291 ZOisVAMe! ££,_~ ));At:. &:>';!)okz.. 

~~e D/' i!Jr£f/l ~ IZ- OL - /?~ 2. 

?4ce_ t>1 al{/}u2~,/! kus/ c._~) v#il-

-~~bo .F~ c~s-s Ros4rtL.~. -lx:( fJ'I-~3 

RECEIVED IN 

COURt Of CRIMfNAl APPeAlS 

APR 17 201~ f /.:)Cy .. '· C r (J~ i(.)Utu /!t! 1!.. , ' -lt6f' 1.. t)J_ t:. 

Ab(tf Acosta, Clerk -- . 

0 FFICIAL eou~l ol' cllli:urAJAL. Ajo_.oP.Ai.s Or ~ 

RtL ,(jbx 123ro E CAP77'ti .:Y/Af/Clt(), rex AS pg~;/ 

PA.: A£ 1! / AccdA 1 C/eiL/:. 

11~~ .'~ .ft:> OC~uo:vktf?tz /WcJ/-'1 of' cf'oo ~I'ZBS' j:>OkckHce ~k 2/'26/20/~. . '- - ----- --- - --- ~ 

t?w ·-/£s Co~e.a£.Spt?>~chucc. 14'~ CovL~ k"ps cdJr~;s c/lty ~~.zL;J/3? 

I u12 ~~J!JIIaai~ ib..e -ff, o? WA./1 t!) / ,~~a6£h.s a.e,4'lff k 6~u 

!22c2-lv24l aucl p~e~frd lo ~P G:v~-1 -TA-e~ ?17/Jcal'cn? 

1/Aoill Ru/:e '12, Uluu!a~ /J/s~Jssaf 

#-uk ~2, 3.-/; Z A~l .U//flra,.,~/· Q,pHse/ 

/hi? Cluk tMv51 Issue A /Vb-h'cf:l -lo /ha ~j?5?/ku~f IJ,q/ ;.s-elay.s 

flow vi' /1,-e AJd'a>?. /(e ~/ u_y'// be d!s;vfsse) ~ u.Jctu-1 

offi1LDSECI/.J~1 · vVfk f~g .OA!Jru/.,L ;; /!.ewRcA'ec/ 6~4~fL l~c/ 

~/e J/> (~tf lj<J/e,v/1/:J /Z2Jw/d;gc/ cvJ/4/JJ -/44-!- ffu~g fh9 

C!vt. ~ tut-'51 »ol t;f $ /;11/5;5 li <t 4;o !'~~~! , 

Chy IJ;,. e_ ~4'2ah.., 

#~ /652026