alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Plant Variety Protection - 40 Certificates Issued on May 30, 2022

APPLICATION 

NUMBER

VARIETY NAME CROP APPLICANT / OWNER *CERTIFIED 

SEED ONLY?

202000049 5PHVN18 Soybean Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000050 5PJJE34 Soybean Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000051 5PJLT40 Soybean Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000052 5PJNS12 Soybean Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000053 5PKAW53 Soybean Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000054 5PAJU23 Soybean Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000055 5PBNS76 Soybean Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000208 BlackBeard Bean Cooperative Elevator Company No

202000209 Spectre Bean Cooperative Elevator Company No

202000212 Competitor Bean Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. No

202000222 PX5C45W3FE Cotton Phytogen Seed Company, LLC. No

202000358 Joybells Grapevine Agricultural Research Council No

202000411 SLOT MACHINE Lettuce Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. No

202100304 PH4CBV Corn Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100305 PH4CD5 Corn Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100306 PH4CD9 Corn Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100307 PH4CDT Corn Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100308 PH4CF1 Corn Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100309 PH4CFZ Corn Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100310 PH4CNB Corn Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100311 PH4CTN Corn Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100312 PH4CTZ Corn Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100313 PH4D4B Corn Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100314 PH4CRF Corn Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100423 SAKZIN019 Zinnia Sakata Seed Corporation No

202100479 TARPON Pepper Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. No

202100480 SBRE7160821 Pepper Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. No

202100481 SBRE7170871 Pepper Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. No

202200056 FLORB12 Begonia Florilis ApS No

202200066 California Blackeye 77 Cowpea The Regents of the University of California No

202200081 6PYSML29B Wheat Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202200082 6PZUD06B Wheat Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202200165 6PASS54B Wheat Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202200166 6PBTL06B Wheat Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202200167 6PDKD09B Wheat Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202200168 6PDLP00B Wheat Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202200169 6PDUA86B Wheat Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202200170 6PEMZ97B Wheat Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202200185 PH2738MR Sorghum Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202200205 AS 3427-OL Safflower Adams Grain Company No

* Certified seed - seed which has been determined by an official seed certifying agency to conform to standards of genetic purity and identity as to variety, 

which standards have been approved by the Secretary.

USDA, AMS, Science and Technology, Plant Variety Protection Office (202) 260-8983 Page 1 of 1
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





**Exhibit
      32.2**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63
      of
      Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Finlay
      Enterprises, Inc., (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 3, 2008
      (the “Report”) that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the SecuritiesExchange
                Act of 1934; and


2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financialcondition
                and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
      June 12, 2008


/s/
                Bruce E. ZurlnickBruce
                E. ZurlnickSenior
                Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
                Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
      States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
      disclosure document.
**Exhibit 99.9**

 

****

 

February 24, 2013

 

Nexen Inc.

801-7th Avenue S.W.

Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P7

 

Board of Directors:

 

We hereby consent to the use of and reference to McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd., and the information derived from our opinion letters concerning our evaluation of certain Canadian in-situ oil sands properties owned by Nexen Inc. (the “Corporation”) and our audit of the Corporation’s Syncrude property ownership, as of December 31, 2012 (the “Opinions”), contained in the sections entitled “Reserves, Production and Related Information” and “Interests of Experts” in the Annual Information Form of the Corporation dated February 24, 2013, which is included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Form 40-F”), as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) the Form 40-F; (ii) the Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-119276, 333-118019 and 333-13574), (iii) the Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-172612, 333-142670, 333-142652 and 333-84786), and (iv) the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-174753), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable. We further consent to the Corporation filing the Opinions with any Canadian or United States securities commission or regulatory authority as it relates to the above mentioned filings.

 
|   | Sincerely,                                       |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                             |
|   | **McDaniel   & Associates Consultants Ltd.** |
|   |                                             |
|   | /s/   P. A. Welch                                |
|   | P. A. Welch, P. Eng.                             |

 

2200, Bow Valley Square 3, 255 - 5 Avenue SW, Calgary AB T2P 3G6 Tel: (403) 262-5506 Fax: (403) 233-2744 www.mcdan.com

 

1

----
#### Application of Charles Richard AVERY, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF the ALASKA BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

No. 3849.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

March 17, 1978.

Edgar P. Boyko and Robert C. Erwin, for petitioner.

William W. Garrison, for respondent.

ORDER

The matter having come before the Court upon Petitioner’s “Petition for Review in the Nature of Original Application for Relief” and Respondent’s opposition thereto, and the Court being advised in the premises;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The decision of the Board of Governors of the Alaska Bar Association giving rise to the instant petition is affirmed.

2. The alternative forms of relief sought by petitioner are denied.

3. The current policy and practice of the Board of Governors offering an attorney applicant the choice of either taking the Multi-State Bar Examination (MBE) or the essay portion of the general examination is in conformity with Alaska Bar Rule 1-2, Section 2(b) which provides for an “attorney bar examination prescribed by the Board.” More particularly, the Board of Governors’ policy and practice of offering the attorney applicant the aforementioned choice is specifically approved as fair and appropriate.

*Application of Stephenson,*516 P.2d 1387 (Alaska 1973) and *In re Stephenson,*511 P.2d 136 (Alaska 1973), to the extent that they may be inconsistent with the instant order, are deemed modified accordingly.

MATTHEWS, J., not participating.

DIMOND, J. Pro Tern., participating.
# C_2016202EN.01017801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/178 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/178

---

Article 304

(ex Article 262 TEC)

(ex Article 262 TEC)

The Committee shall be consulted by the European Parliament, by the Council or by the Commission where the Treaties so provide. The Committee may be consulted by these institutions in all cases in which they consider it appropriate. It may issue an opinion on its own initiative in cases in which it considers such action appropriate.

The European Parliament, the Council or the Commission shall, if it considers it necessary, set the Committee, for the submission of its opinion, a time limit which may not be less than one month from the date on which the chairman receives notification to this effect. Upon expiry of the time limit, the absence of an opinion shall not prevent further action.

The opinion of the Committee, together with a record of the proceedings, shall be forwarded to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Commission.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic
Report), I, Paul Genova, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |                                                      | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Paul
 Genova                                     | 
| |                                                      | 
| | Paul Genova                                         
| | Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
| | May 17, 2010                                        

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.

---
# C_2016202EN.01009901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/99 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/99

---

Article 125

(ex Article 103 TEC)

(ex Article 103 TEC)

1.   The Union shall not be liable for or assume the commitments of central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of any Member State, without prejudice to mutual financial guarantees for the joint execution of a specific project. A Member State shall not be liable for or assume the commitments of central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of another Member State, without prejudice to mutual financial guarantees for the joint execution of a specific project.

2.   The Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, may, as required, specify definitions for the application of the prohibitions referred to in Articles 123 and 124 and in this Article.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1013

ALVIA L. LACY,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Amtrak; LARRY 

TAYLOR,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:14-cv-00179-RDB)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvia L. Lacy, Appellant Pro Se. Kaiser H. Chowdhry, William J. 

Delany, Andrew George Sakallaris, MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, 

Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alvia L. Lacy appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on her complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Title 

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e (2012). We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Lacy v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., No. 1:14-cv-00179-

RDB (D. Md. Dec. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE V

AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

CHAPTER 4

JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS

Article 85

(ex Article 31 TEU)

(ex Article 31 TEU)

1.   Eurojust's mission shall be to support and strengthen coordination and cooperation between national investigating and prosecuting authorities in relation to serious crime affecting two or more Member States or requiring a prosecution on common bases, on the basis of operations conducted and information supplied by the Member States' authorities and by Europol.

In this context, the European Parliament and the Council, by means of regulations adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall determine Eurojust's structure, operation, field of action and tasks. These tasks may include:

| (a) | the initiation of criminal investigations, as well as proposing the initiation of prosecutions conducted by competent national authorities, particularly those relating to offences against the financial interests of the Union; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the initiation of criminal investigations, as well as proposing the initiation of prosecutions conducted by competent national authorities, particularly those relating to offences against the financial interests of the Union;

| (b) | the coordination of investigations and prosecutions referred to in point (a); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the coordination of investigations and prosecutions referred to in point (a);

| (c) | the strengthening of judicial cooperation, including by resolution of conflicts of jurisdiction and by close cooperation with the European Judicial Network. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the strengthening of judicial cooperation, including by resolution of conflicts of jurisdiction and by close cooperation with the European Judicial Network.

These regulations shall also determine arrangements for involving the European Parliament and national Parliaments in the evaluation of Eurojust's activities.

2.   In the prosecutions referred to in paragraph 1, and without prejudice to Article 86, formal acts of judicial procedure shall be carried out by the competent national officials.

---
# C_2016203EN.01003601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/36

---

Article 92

The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the goods and products specified in the lists forming Annex IV to this Treaty.

These lists may, at the request of the Commission or of a Member State, be amended by the Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission.

---
EXHIBIT 23


                                           INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Carter-Wallace, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-00499) on Form S-8 of Carter-Wallace, Inc. of our report dated May 5, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Carter-Wallace, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, retained earnings and comprehensive earnings, and cash
flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1999, and
related financial statement schedule which report appears in the March 31, 1999
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Carter-Wallace, Inc.





                                                                        KPMG LLP



New York, New York
June 11, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6167

FELIPE TRUJILLO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOHN PATE, Warden, Allendale Correctional Institution,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(2:14-cv-00361-TMC)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Felipe Trujillo, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Melody Jane Brown, Assistant 

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Felipe Trujillo seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition.* The 

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge 

recommended that relief be denied and advised Trujillo that 

failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could 

waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the 

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have 

been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. 

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Trujillo has waived 

appellate review by failing to timely file objections after 

receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny Trujillo’s motion 

for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

 * To the extent that Trujillo also seeks to appeal the 

district court’s denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion, we 

lack jurisdiction to consider that order because he did not file 

a notice of appeal until after the appeal period expired. See

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (a)(4)(B)(ii); Bowles v. Russell, 

551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Compliance & Enforcement/Appeals Summary

Reporting Period: Fiscal Year (FY) 2017

COMPLIANCE & ENFORCEMENT: OVERALL SUMMARY

Q1 (Oct - Dec 2016) Q2 (Jan - Mar 2017) Q3 (Apr - Jun 2017) Q4 (Jul - Sep 2017) FY 17 Summary

Incoming Complaints 87 128 68 96 379

Completed Complaint Reviews 

and Investigations

22 49 197 194 462

APPEALS: OVERALL SUMMARY1 (For more information, refer to NOP 4011: Adverse Action Appeal Process)

Number of Incoming 12 9 13 6 40

Appeals by Disposition

Decisions 1 0 3 9 13

Dismissals 0 0 0 0 0

Referrals 0 1 0 0 1

Closures 4 0 2 4 10

SUMMARY OF INITIAL ACTIONS TAKEN

Cease & Desist Orders 5 3 6 4 18

Notices of Warning 4 26 40 30 100

Investigation Referrals 8 15 89 50 162

SUSPENSIONS AND REVOCATIONS OF OPERATIONS’ CERTIFICATION (NOP and CERTIFIER INITIATED)

Suspensions 75 53 65 101 294

Revocations 4 3 6 4 17

SUMMARY OF DISPOSITIONS (ALL NOP)

Total: Settlement Agreements2 6 9 12 6 33

Total: Consent Decisions 0 0 1 14 2

Total: Civil Penalties Levied3 $45,000 $38,250 $56,500 $58,750 $187,500

GENERAL NOTES

1. Total reflects appeals closed in FY 2017 regardless of when cases were initiated.

2. Not all settlement agreements include civil penalties and not all civil penalties were levied via settlement agreements.

3. Total reflects the amount of penalties initially levied. Amounts may change during negotiation of settlements and individual penalty 

payments may be outstanding.

4. On July 20, 2017, a USDA Administrative Law Judge issued a Consent Decision and Order under which Xochitl, a formerly-certified 

organic corn chip manufacturer in Irving, Texas, agreed to a two-year suspension of its certification. The Decision and Order upheld 

a September 2015 USDA ALJ Decision that originally included a $1,826,000 civil penalty. Xochitl will be permitted to seek 

reinstatement of its certification after one year, and required to pay only $475,000 of the penalty, if it complies with the USDA 

organic regulations during the first year of suspension. Xochitl may not sell products as organic while the suspension is in place.

Access organic enforcement to learn more.

Want to receive National Organic Program updates? Sign up to receive email updates at NOP Updates.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          97,304
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,187,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    328,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,137,610
<PP&E>                                       7,082,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                 585,248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,776,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,414,324
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,333,825
<OTHER-SE>                                     571,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,776,889
<SALES>                                     19,434,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,434,950
<CGS>                                       18,363,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,363,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               291,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             194,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                603,650
<INCOME-TAX>                                   209,019
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            394,631
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   394,631
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.17


</TABLE>