alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             889
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      491
<ALLOWANCES>                                        77
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,902
<PP&E>                                          10,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                (61,637)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,950
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,634
<SALES>                                          3,038
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,472
<CGS>                                              926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    715
<INCOME-TAX>                                       260
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                455
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       455
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 886 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to permit States to impose 

workforce requirements for individuals made eligible for medical assistance under the amendments made by the Affordable Care Act, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2015 

Mr. WESTERMAN (for himself, Mr. WOMACK, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. BLUM, 

Mr. HILL, Mr. ROUZER, and Mr. CRAWFORD) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to permit 

States to impose workforce requirements for individuals 

made eligible for medical assistance under the amendments made by the Affordable Care Act, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Flexibility and 

5 Workforce Requirement Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 886 IH

1 SEC. 2. PERMITTING STATES TO IMPOSE WORKFORCE RE2 QUIREMENTS FOR NONDISABLED INDIVID3 UALS MADE ELIGIBLE FOR MEDICAID UNDER 

4 ACA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII) 

6 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII)) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘and whose income’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘whose income’’; and 

10 (2) by inserting after ‘‘subsection (k)’’ the fol11 lowing: ‘‘, and who meet such workforce require12 ments (such as actively being employed or seeking 

13 employment) as the State may, in its discretion, es14 tablish with respect to nondisabled individuals’’. 

15 (b) FLEXIBILITY IN IMPLEMENTATION.—Nothing in 

16 the amendments made by subsection (a) shall prevent a 

17 State from exercising its discretion in how and when it 

18 applies the workforce requirements authorized by such 

19 amendments to medical assistance for items and services 

20 furnished after the date of the enactment of this Act, in21 cluding the application of such amendments to individuals 

22 for whom a determination of eligibility for such assistance 

23 is made before, on, or after such date. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VII

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

CHAPTER 1

RULES ON COMPETITION

SECTION 1

SECTION 1

RULES APPLYING TO UNDERTAKINGS

Article 103

(ex Article 83 TEC)

(ex Article 83 TEC)

1.   The appropriate regulations or directives to give effect to the principles set out in Articles 101 and 102 shall be laid down by the Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament.

2.   The regulations or directives referred to in paragraph 1 shall be designed in particular:

| (a) | to ensure compliance with the prohibitions laid down in Article 101(1) and in Article 102 by making provision for fines and periodic penalty payments; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to ensure compliance with the prohibitions laid down in Article 101(1) and in Article 102 by making provision for fines and periodic penalty payments;

| (b) | to lay down detailed rules for the application of Article 101(3), taking into account the need to ensure effective supervision on the one hand, and to simplify administration to the greatest possible extent on the other; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to lay down detailed rules for the application of Article 101(3), taking into account the need to ensure effective supervision on the one hand, and to simplify administration to the greatest possible extent on the other;

| (c) | to define, if need be, in the various branches of the economy, the scope of the provisions of Articles 101 and 102; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

to define, if need be, in the various branches of the economy, the scope of the provisions of Articles 101 and 102;

| (d) | to define the respective functions of the Commission and of the Court of Justice of the European Union in applying the provisions laid down in this paragraph; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

to define the respective functions of the Commission and of the Court of Justice of the European Union in applying the provisions laid down in this paragraph;

| (e) | to determine the relationship between national laws and the provisions contained in this Section or adopted pursuant to this Article. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

to determine the relationship between national laws and the provisions contained in this Section or adopted pursuant to this Article.

---
Exhibit 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Nigel F. Penney , Chief Financial Officer of Chaparral Resources, Inc. (the
"company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     1.   The company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
          31, 2004 ("Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

     2.   All of the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the company.



Date: March 25, 2005                        /s/  Nigel F. Penney
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                 Nigel F. Penney
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM S32487

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Ralph J. GARCIA

Airman First Class (E-3), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 29 May 2018

________________________

Military Judge: John C. Degnan.

Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 2 months, 

reduction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 30 August 2017

by SpCM convened at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. 

For Appellant: Captain Meghan Glines-Barney, USAF.

For Appellee: Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire.

Before MAYBERRY, HARDING, and SPERANZA, Appellate Military 

Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 

59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). 
United States v. Garcia, No. ACM S32487

2

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court
# C_2016202EN.01016301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/163 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/163

---

Article 264

(ex Article 231 TEC)

(ex Article 231 TEC)

If the action is well founded, the Court of Justice of the European Union shall declare the act concerned to be void.

However, the Court shall, if it considers this necessary, state which of the effects of the act which it has declared void shall be considered as definitive.

---
Order entered April 15, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00436-CV

IN RE CHARLES HENSLEY MITCHELL, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-14792

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. 

We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE
# C_2016203EN.01003701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/37

---

Article 99

The Commission may make any recommendations for facilitating movements of capital intended to finance the industrial activities listed in Annex II to this Treaty.

---
#### In the Matter of Cecily J. Periana, Petitioner, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review an order of the Commissioner of the State Division of Human Rights, dated October 13, 1989, which, after a hearing, found that Becton Dickinson Immunodiagnostics did not discriminate against the petitioner because of her sex and national origin *(see,*Executive Law § 296 [1] [a]).

Adjudged that the order is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs to the respondent Becton Dickinson Immunodiagnostics payable by the petitioner.

The determination by the Commissioner that the respondent Becton Dickinson Immunodiagnostics did not unlawfully discriminate against the petitioner on the basis of her national origin and sex was supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. v New York State Div. of Human Rights,*77 NY2d 411, 417-418; *300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176). There was evidence that the petitioner did not follow company procedure in documenting her work, had poor interpersonal skills, did not get along with her co-workers, and kept irregular hours.

Furthermore, the limited questioning of the petitioner by the Administrative Law Judge was done to clarify confusing testimony and to facilitate the orderly and expeditious prog*746ress of the hearing *(see, People v Yut Wai Tom,*53 NY2d 44, 57; *People v Jamison,*47 NY2d 882, 883-884). In this administrative proceeding which was held before an Administrative Law Judge, the danger that the Administrative Law Judge’s intervention would unduly prejudice the petitioner was minimal *(see, Matter of James Robert L.,*122 AD2d 51). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                   ------------


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 23, 2006 (as amended, the "Report"),  I, Marvin
F. Romanow, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nexen Inc.,
a Canadian Corporation (the "Company"),  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
      Company.


Date: April 2, 2007                             /s/ Marvin F. Romanow
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Marvin F. Romanow
                                                Executive Vice President, and
                                                Chief Financial Officer




A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     NAGI FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE 3-98 QTR
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.21.1

AMENDED  EXHIBIT "A"    To The    GAS PURCHASE CONTRACT    As Of: October 1, 1994    Between    CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION ("BUYER")    and
   IGI RESOURCES, INC. ("SELLER")

Effective
Date of this Exhibit "A":  October 1, 2001

Ending
Date of this Exhibit "A":  March 31, 2002

DELIVERY POINT

As defined in Section 1.01(g) of the Contract noted aboveMAXIMUM DAILY CONTRACT QUANTITY(MMBtu)

7,446DELIVERY POINT SELLING PRICE

1/


---



| |  | "BUYER"
CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
| |  | ---------------------------------------
| |  |                                        
| |  | By:                                    
| |  | Name:                                  
| |  | Title:                                 
| |  |                                        
| |  |                                        
| |  | "SELLER"
IGI RESOURCES, INC.           
| |  |                                        
| |  | By:                                    
| |  | Name:                                  
| |  | Title:                                 

---

QuickLinks
OMB APPROVED: NO. 0581-0128

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE 

LIVESTOCK, POULTRY, AND SEED PROGRAM

USDA PROCESSED EGG AND EGG PRODUCTS EXPORT CERTIFICATE

NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONSIGNOR/EXPORTER: CERTIFICATE NUMBER:

WEC0001

 COMPETENT AUTHORITY:

 AMS

 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONSIGNEE/IMPORTER:

STATE OF ORIGIN:

COUNTRY OF DESTINATION:

PLACE OF LOADING:

MEANS OF TRANSPORT: DECLARED POINT OF ENTRY:

CONDITIONS OF TRANSPORT/STORAGE:

PRODUCER/MANUFACTURER: DATE OF PACKING: TYPE OF PACKING:

NAME OF PRODUCTS: NUMBER OF PACKAGES: NET WEIGHT:

ATTESTATIONS:

1. The product is wholesome, fit for human consumption, and has free sale in the United States of America. 

2. The product was manufactured in an approved facility subject to regular audits or inspections aimed at ensuring proper processing and acceptable hygienic 

conditions to produce products for human consumption.

3. The product has been processed at a temperature to inactivate harmful pathogens of general concern for public health.

4. To the best of our kmowledge the product contains no harmful levels of contaminants.

DATE: PRINTED NAME: 

CERTIFICATION

 SIGNATURE:

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The 

valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0581-0128. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 12 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing 

instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, 

parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program (Not all prohibited bases apply to 

all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice 

and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 

(TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

LPS-234 (05-2017)

PRINTED NAME:
## LORI SCJ-f:MID CertifieaSfiortfianaReyorter Jfays County Cou-rt at Law 712 S. Stagecoacfi T-raa; Suite 2292 San :Marcos, Texas 78666 512.393.7740 Lo-ri.scfimia@co.fiays. tx.us 

### { 

## ______________________________________}

Mr. Cln·is Knowles 3rd Court ofAppeals Sent via e-mail September 29,2015
IN RE: Appellate Cause No.: 03-15-00375-CV; Trial Court Cause No. 15-0173; Robert M. Zapata, Appellant v Bank ofAmerica, N.A., Appellee

Dear Mr. Knowles: The Reporter's Record in the above·referenced case has just been ordered today and payment arrangements have been made but are still pending. I am hereby respectfully requesting a two·week extension to file the Reporter's Record with the Third Court ofAppeals. Thank you.

# ;z::~.WH"~ Lori Schmid Certified Shorthand Reporter 

# I ! 

## '
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 15


Goody's Family Clothing, Inc.
Knoxville, Tennessee


We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Goody's Family Clothing, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of and for the
periods ended August 2, 2003 and August 3, 2002 as indicated in our report
dated August 18, 2003; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no
opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 2, 2003, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-32357, 33-51210,
33-68520, 333-00052 and 333-09595 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
August 20, 2003


                                       19
H. R. 890 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

System units in Florida. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER 

RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The maps subtitled ‘‘Cape Romano Unit P15, 

Tigertail Unit FL–63P’’ and ‘‘Keewaydin Island Unit P16’’ included 

in the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ 

referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 

(16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to certain John H. Chafee Coastal 

Barrier Resources System units in Florida are hereby replaced 

by other maps relating to the units subtitled ‘‘Cape Romano Unit 

P15/P15P’’, ‘‘Keewaydin Island Unit P16/P16P, Tigertail Unit FL– 

63P’’, and ‘‘Keewaydin Island Unit P16/P16P’’, respectively, and 

dated April 10, 2015. 

(b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall keep 

the replacement maps referred to in subsection (a) on file and 

available for inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the 

Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.