alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

 

I, John P. D. Cato, Chairman, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of The Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of thisCertification:

 

1.    the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended January 29,2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.    the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: March 29, 2011

|   |                     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | /s/  John P. D. Cato     |   |
|   | John  P. D. Cato         |   |
|   | Chairman,  President and |   |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

 

 

69

 

----
10K


Exhibit
      23.1




















Consent
      of Independent Registered Public
      Accounting Firm









Board
      of Directors and
      Stockholders


The
      Bureau of National Affairs,
      Inc.


Arlington,
      Virginia





We
      hereby consent to the incorporation
      by reference in theregistration statements
      (Nos. 333−87450
      and 333−140957) on Form S−8 of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.of our report dated March
      27,2008, relating to the
      consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Bureau of NationalAffairs, Inc. appearing
      in
      the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
      Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to accounting
      changes as the result of adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
      No. 158, Employer’s Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
      Postretirement Plans – An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and
      132(R) and the retrospective application of the change in accounting for direct
      selling expenses.




/s/BDO
      Seidman, LLP


BDO
      Seidman, LLP


Bethesda,
      Maryland





March27,
      2008







64
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying QuarterlyReport of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 (the “Report”),I, L’Sheryl D. Hudson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LINDA PEDROZA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2151

[May 30, 2018]

Appeal of order denying 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the 

Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 50-2000-CF-008753AXXXMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven 

Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the circuit court’s denial of her motion to correct 

sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), challenging

the forty-year sentence imposed following a second-degree murder

conviction. She has not shown that her sentence, imposed when she was 

a juvenile for the murder of her mother, violates the Eighth Amendment 

as construed by any decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. 

Nor has she identified any clear, binding Florida Supreme Court decision 

that requires resentencing. We note the Florida Supreme Court’s recent 

decisions in both Morris v. State, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S223a (Fla. May 10, 

2018) and Williams v. State, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S183 (Fla. Apr. 19, 2018), 

involved concessions of error by the state. 

Thus, we affirm based on Hart v. State, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D970a (Fla. 

4th DCA May 2, 2018) (en banc). As we did in Hart, we certify conflict with 

Cuevas v. State, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D563 (Fla. 2d DCA Mar. 9, 2018), Blount 

v. State, 238 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018), Mosier v. State, 235 So. 3d 

957 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), Alfaro v. State, 233 So. 3d 515 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017),
2

and Burrows v. State, 219 So. 3d 910 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). We also certify 

conflict with Katwaroo v. State, 237 So. 3d 446 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) and 

Tarrand v. State, 199 So. 3d 507 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended March 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: June 11, 2008  By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle J. Douglas Cagle Chief Executive Officer          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended March 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: June 11, 2008  By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV Mark M. Ham IV Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016202EN.01034801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/348 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/348

---

32.   Declaration on Article 168(4)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 168(4)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference declares that the measures to be adopted pursuant to Article 168(4)(c) must meet common safety concerns and aim to set high standards of quality and safety where national standards affecting the internal market would otherwise prevent a high level of human health protection being achieved.

---
# C_2016202EN.01006101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/61

---

Article 34

(ex Article 28 TEC)

(ex Article 28 TEC)

Quantitative restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States.

---
## Draft Proposal E-5

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Existing Buildings Code (IEBC).

Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft code

change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/deve lopment/iebc_concepts



## Fenestration Energy Requirements (E-5)

Objective: Require fenestration in repairs, alterations or additions to meet the provisions of the

International Energy Conservation Code (IECC).

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section 406 and [B] 406 as follows:

SECTION 406 GLASS FENESTRATION

[B] 406.1 Conformance. The installation or replacement of glass shall be as required for

new installations. Fenestration installed to re place existing fenestration or being added to

new openings in the building thermal envelope shall meet the provisions of the IECC

Reason: The current code provisions correctly addre ss replacement of glass. The definition of

“fenestration” is broader and includes other materials. As such, it is likely that in applying the

current code provisions, either other glazing materials would be excluded and not subject to the

code or, more likely, addition of fenestration products (assemblies) as opposed to just changing

a pane of glass would also be excluded. The proposed text retains the current criteria

associated with glass but further ensures that the broader subject of fenestration, of which glass

is a part, is also clarified and is required to meet the 2012 IECC.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact other than ensuring that maybe something that might not

have been considered would now through clarification be considered.
Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers


The undersigned firm of Independent  Petroleum Engineers,  of Calgary,  Alberta,
Canada, knows that it is named as having prepared an evaluation of the interests
of Canada Southern  Petroleum Ltd.,  dated March 26, 1999,  prepared for filings
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on Form 10-K 1998, and hereby gives
its consent to the use of its name and to the use of the said estimates.



                                             Paddock Lindstrom & Associates Ltd.



                                             /s/ L. K. Lindstrom
                                             L. K. Lindstrom, P. Eng.
                                             President


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (4)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (4)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (4)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (4)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
Unprocessed Fruit & 

Vegetable Pilot Program

USDA PILOT MAILBOX

FVPILOTINVOICE@AMS.USDA.GOV

CAMILLIA FREELAND-TAYLOR

CONTRACT SPECIALIST, AMS

CAMILLIA.FREELAND-TAYLOR@AMS.USDA.GOV

KYLE HUGO

MARKETING SPECIALIST, AMS

KYLE.HUGO@AMS.USDA.GOV
Unprocessed Fruit & 

Vegetable Pilot Program 

 Part of the 2014 Farm Bill

 Created as a way for schools to have more options for 

unprocessed fruits and vegetables

 The Pilot project allows participating states to 

 Use multiple suppliers and products established and qualified by 

the Secretary 

 Designate a geographic preference

 Uses schools’ existing commercial channels and relationships 

with growers and suppliers

 Additionally supports use of locally-grown foods in school 

programs
Participating states

Oregon

Connecticut

Michigan

Washington

Began in School Year 2014-2015
Vendors

• 93 Eligible Vendors participate in the program 

• Suppliers and distributors

• 2/3 of participating vendors are considered small 

businesses
Products

 Approximately $11 million of entitlement spending is 

designated to the Pilot Program

Top 5 produce items purchased:

 Apples 

 Romaine lettuce

 Oranges

 Pears

 Salad mixes
Becoming a Participating 

Vendor

 Vendor Eligibility Requirements can be found on 

https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/pilot- project

 To become a participating vendor

 Fill out the Vendor Application Forms (Attachment 

A-D)

 Have GHP/GAP certificates for suppliers and 

products planning to deliver

 Food safety plan, segregation plan (if handling 

non-domestic product)

For questions or assistance regarding your 

pilot application please contact Mr. Sean Martin 

503-586-6473
Adding products/suppliers 

for participating vendors

 Vendors can add new products and suppliers at 

anytime

 Fill out the Vendor Application Form (only 

Attachments A & D) and submit to 

FVPilotProject@ams.usda.gov . 

 Attachments A/D are approved/rejected in full, 

no partial, item-by-item approval

 Remember to updated your GHP/GAP 

certificates as they expire. 
Invoicing

 All invoices must be submitted through WBSCM

 Need to attach:

 Excel template

 BOL/proof of delivery

 School approval documents

 Total of all attached excel templates should match 

with invoiced quantity

 Step-by-step instructions can be found on our 

webpage under Current Participating Vendor 

https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/pilot-project

 Webinar/documents available on webpage to 

assist, or please contact us with any questions
Quality and Improvement 

of Pilot Program

 2018 Farm Bill

 Fresh product micro-end testing requirements

 Invoicing Verification 

 SY 17-18 Vendor Audits

 Survey

 Roundtable discussion 11:45-12:30

 Tips on faster invoicing

 Newsletter
Contact Information

USDA Pilot Mailbox

FVPilotInvoice@ams.usda.gov

Camillia Freeland-Taylor

Contract Specialist, AMS

Camillia.Freeland-Taylor@ams.usda.gov

Kyle Hugo

Marketing Specialist, AMS

Kyle.Hugo@ams.usda.gov
# C_2016202EN.01028301.xml

| | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/283 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/283

---

PROTOCOL (No 14)

ON THE EURO GROUP

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to promote conditions for stronger economic growth in the European Union and, to that end, to develop ever-closer coordination of economic policies within the euro area,

CONSCIOUS of the need to lay down special provisions for enhanced dialogue between the Member States whose currency is the euro, pending the euro becoming the currency of all Member States of the Union,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Article 1

The Ministers of the Member States whose currency is the euro shall meet informally. Such meetings shall take place, when necessary, to discuss questions related to the specific responsibilities they share with regard to the single currency. The Commission shall take part in the meetings. The European Central Bank shall be invited to take part in such meetings, which shall be prepared by the representatives of the Ministers with responsibility for finance of the Member States whose currency is the euro and of the Commission.

Article 2

The Ministers of the Member States whose currency is the euro shall elect a president for two and a half years, by a majority of those Member States.

---
# C_2016202EN.01019201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/192 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/192

---

Article 338

(ex Article 285 TEC)

(ex Article 285 TEC)

1.   Without prejudice to Article 5 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall adopt measures for the production of statistics where necessary for the performance of the activities of the Union.

2.   The production of Union statistics shall conform to impartiality, reliability, objectivity, scientific independence, cost-effectiveness and statistical confidentiality; it shall not entail excessive burdens on economic operators.

---
Opinion issued April 21, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00049-CR

———————————

JORDAN CAMPBELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-15267

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Jordan Campbell, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal in 

compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See TEX. R. APP. P.
2

42.2(a).1 Although there is no certificate of conference, the motion contains a 

certificate of service on appellee and has been on file with the Court for more than 

10 days, and no party has responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 

10.3(a)(2). We have not issued a decision in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.2(a).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 1 Pursuant to the Texas Supreme Court’s docket equalization powers, this 

appeal was transferred from the Ninth Court of Appeals to this Court on 

January 8, 2015. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West Supp. 2014); 

Order Regarding Transfer of Cases From Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket 

No. 14-9246 (Tex. Dec. 15, 2014).
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus II
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2002 (the "Report"), I, Sam P. Douglass, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  November 14, 2002                 /s/ Sam P. Douglass
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Sam P. Douglass
                                          Chairman
                                          Chief Executive Officer



                                       1
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                              CALPROP CORPORATION

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
2-86872, 333-15333, 33-33640, 333-15137, 33-57226, 33-62516, 33-88892, and
333-15061 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 19, 1997 appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Calprop Corporation for the year ended December
31, 1996.

                                          Deloitte & Touche LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 19, 1997
# C_2012326EN.01020101.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

PROTOCOL (No 26)

ON SERVICES OF GENERAL INTEREST

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

WISHING to emphasise the importance of services of general interest,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following interpretative provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Article 1

The shared values of the Union in respect of services of general economic interest within the meaning of Article 14 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union include in particular:

| — | the essential role and the wide discretion of national, regional and local authorities in providing, commissioning and organising services of general economic interest as closely as possible to the needs of the users; |
| --- | --- |

—

the essential role and the wide discretion of national, regional and local authorities in providing, commissioning and organising services of general economic interest as closely as possible to the needs of the users;

| — | the diversity between various services of general economic interest and the differences in the needs and preferences of users that may result from different geographical, social or cultural situations; |
| --- | --- |

—

the diversity between various services of general economic interest and the differences in the needs and preferences of users that may result from different geographical, social or cultural situations;

| — | a high level of quality, safety and affordability, equal treatment and the promotion of universal access and of user rights. |
| --- | --- |

—

a high level of quality, safety and affordability, equal treatment and the promotion of universal access and of user rights.

Article 2

The provisions of the Treaties do not affect in any way the competence of Member States to provide, commission and organise non-economic services of general interest.

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

Cause number: 01

- 1 6

- 0 0 11 9

- CR

Style: Derek Baldit v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : J u n e 2 3

, 201 6

Type of motion: Third Motion f o r E xten sion of T ime to F ile Reporter’s Record

Party filing motion: Court Reporter Sandra Powell

Document to be filed: Reporter’s Record

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: March 14 , 201 6

Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due D ate: J u n e 1 0 , 201 6

Date Requested: J u ne 29 , 201 6 (10 7 days from original deadline)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document i s to be filed, document due: J u ne 29 , 201 6

.  No further extensions of time will be granted

.  Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Because the court reporter’s third extension request only seeks until June 29, 2016, to

file the reporter’s record

, this extension is granted , but the reporter is warned that

no further extensions will be granted

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 3 5.3(c).

Accordingly, if the reporter’s record is not filed by June 29 , 2016

, the Cou rt may abate

this appeal for the trial court to hold a show

- cause hearing to determine whether

Sandra Powell should be held in contempt. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 3 7.3(a) (2)

.

Judge’ s signature : /s/ Ev elyn Keyes

x

Date: June 24, 2016