alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    Homecommentreply1166Add new comment
Add new comment
        
                  WILLIAM S WOOD (not verified)PermalinkJuly 8, 2020 - 4:05pmGreat restoration project...
ReplyYour name
Email Address
        The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comment
About text formats
Plain text
  
  
      
          No HTML tags allowed.
                      Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
                      Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically. Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
# C_2016202EN.01033701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/337 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/337

---

4.   Declaration on the composition of the European Parliament

Declaration on the composition of the European Parliament

The additional seat in the European Parliament will be attributed to Italy.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Paul R. Flanders, Chief Financial Officer of Carrols Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/    PAUL R. FLANDERS                               
|Paul R. Flanders                                      
|Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|July 28, 2005
ACCEPTED

12-15-00086-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

4/21/2015 12:56:37 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/21/2015 12:56:37 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
FELICIA PITRE

DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK

6 0 0 COMMERCE STREET DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 (214) - 653 - 7301 

FAX (214) - 653 - 6634 e-mail: FELICIA.PITRE@dallascounty.org 

web site: www.dallascounty.org/distclerk/index.html

NINA MOUNTIQUE

CHIEF DEPUTY

LISA MATZ April 16, 2015

Clerk of the Court, Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

George L. Allen Sr. Courts Building

600 Commerce Street, Suite 200

Dallas, Texas 75202

TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO.: DF-13-06724

COURT OF APPEAL CASE NO.: 05-15-00180-CV

APPELLANT: Kevin Smith

APPELLEE: Kenisha Turner

 

APPELLANT ATTORNEY: Pro se

SBOT NO.: NA

ADDRESS: 338 South Goode Rd.

Wilmer, TX 75172

TELEPHONE NUMBER: 469328-6199

FAX NUMBER: NA

Dear Ms. Matz:

In reference to the above styled and numbered cause, our records reflect the due date for the 

Clerk’s Record was March 12, 2015. Pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P 35.1. 35.3(a), and 37.3(b), the 

Clerk’s Record has been prepared but is being held for non-payment of $349.00.

FELICIA PITRE

District Clerk

Dallas County, Texas

By BRIDGETTE VATION, Deputy 

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 4/16/2015 3:29:10 PM LISA MATZ Clerk
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL MANAGER


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
undersigned, Kathleen A. Hill, Principal Financial Manager of
Nutrition Management Services Company, a Pennsylvania corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to her knowledge, that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 of the
Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
Kathleen A. Hill


Kathleen
A. Hill


Principal
Financial Manager






November
25, 2009
20265

#### State v. Schlegel

Vacated
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 21, 2015

Order 

April 21, 2015

150725(195)(198)

MARKELL VANSLEMBROUCK, Minor, by and

through ERIC BRAVERMAN, Conservator,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

KIMBERLY A. VANSLEMBROUCK,

Plaintiff,

v

ANDREW JAY HALPERIN, M.D., and WILLIAM 

BEAUMONT HOSPITAL,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

MICHIGAN INSTITUTE OF GYNECOLOGY

AND OBSTETRICS, P.C.,

Defendant.

SC: 150725

COA: 309680

Oakland CC: 2006-074585-NH

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the separate motions of the Michigan Defense Trial 

Counsel and the Michigan Association for Justice to participate as amici curiae are

GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted by the Michigan Association for Justice on 

April 14, 2015, is accepted for filing. An amicus brief from the Michigan Defense Trial 

Counsel will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before May 7, 2015.
#### State v. Puha

26326

11/28/2005

Denied

109 Hawai'i 67, 122 P.3d 1165
#### Winifred RIEBER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LIBERTY MUSIC SHOPS, Inc., and Frank L. FLYNN, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 70.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 20, 1939.

William J. McArthur and William Rochkind, both of New York City (William B. Shelton, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Lorenz & Lorenz, of New York City (Joseph Lorenz, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2016203EN.01004801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/48

---

Article 195

The institutions of the Community, the Agency and the Joint Undertakings shall, in applying this Treaty, comply with the conditions of access to ores, source materials and special fissile materials laid down in national rules and regulations made for reasons of public policy or public health.

---
# C_2016202EN.01011301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/113 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/113

---

Article 150

(ex Article 130 TEC)

(ex Article 130 TEC)

The Council, acting by a simple majority after consulting the European Parliament, shall establish an Employment Committee with advisory status to promote coordination between Member States on employment and labour market policies. The tasks of the Committee shall be:

| — | to monitor the employment situation and employment policies in the Member States and the Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

to monitor the employment situation and employment policies in the Member States and the Union,

| — | without prejudice to Article 240, to formulate opinions at the request of either the Council or the Commission or on its own initiative, and to contribute to the preparation of the Council proceedings referred to in Article 148. |
| --- | --- |

—

without prejudice to Article 240, to formulate opinions at the request of either the Council or the Commission or on its own initiative, and to contribute to the preparation of the Council proceedings referred to in Article 148.

In fulfilling its mandate, the Committee shall consult management and labour.

Each Member State and the Commission shall appoint two members of the Committee.

---
#### Jeanette Levine, Plaintiff, *v.*Sid Levine, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kangs County,

June 4, 1959.

*677
      *J. Murray Harris*for plaintiff.

*Bernard Panfel*for defendant.

Benjamin Bbenner, J.

Motion by the plaintiff wife for possession of a co-operative apartment presently occupied by the defendant husband and for a counsel fee.

Plaintiff seeks the removal of the defendant from the co-operative apartment although the shares of stock relative to same have been issued to him, it being her claim that she has contributed to both the cost of the apartment and to its upkeep. A sharp issue has thus been raised as to joint ownership of the property relative to which this court has no power to make a disposition on motion. Hence, if plaintiff claims ownership or joint ownership of the co-operative apartment, as she apparently does relative to certain items of furniture and other personal property, all of which claims are disputed by the husband, she must seek relief by appropriate action to recover same. *(Adelman*v. *Adelman,*3 A D 2d 839.)

Moreover, section 1164-a of the Civil Practice Act is not applicable here since it empowers the court in matrimonial actions to direct sole occupancy to either party only when it is undisputed that the premises are owned as tenants by the entirety. *(Donnelly*v. *Donnelly,*272 App. Div. 779; *Cox*v. *Cox,*266 App. Div. 38; *Nai*v. *Nai,*129 N. Y. S. 2d 838; *Goodwin*v. *Goodwin,*172 Misc. 118.)

Plaintiff’s motion for counsel fee *pendente lite*is granted and defendant is directed to pay to her the sum of $200, one half of which shall be paid within 15 days after service of a copy of an order to be entered herein, and the remainder when the cause first appears on the calendar for trial, with leave, however, to apply to the Trial Justice for an additional counsel fee.

Settle order on notice.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10690

Summary Calendar

AJI PAUL EASWARANKUDYIL; NINU KURIAN, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

MARK J. HAZUDA, Director, Nebraska Service Center, US Citizenship and 

Immigration Services; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director, US Citizenship 

and Immigration Services; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY 

GENERAL; RAND BEERS, ACTING SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF 

HOMELAND SECURITY, 

 Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CV-4166

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

For the reasons set forth in its Order of May 19, 2014, the district court’s 

Final Judgment of May 19, 2014 is, in all respects, AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 47.6.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-10690 Document: 00513011245 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2015
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (the
“Report”), I, John A Hardy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                              
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2013 |  | /s/ John A. Hardy                            
|                    |  | John A. Hardy
        Chief Executive Officer
Formal Recommendation by the 

National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) 

to the National Organic Program (NOP)

Date: December 2, 2011

Subject: Animal Enzymes: National List § 205.605(a) Sunset 2013 

Chair: Tracy Miedema

 

 

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action

 

Statement of the Recommendation (Including Recount of Vote): 

The National Organic Standards Board voted 14 Yes, 0 No, 0 Absent, 0 

Abstentions, and 0 Recusals for relisting of Animal Enzymes to the National 

List section 205.605(a) as follows: Animal enzymes—(Rennet—animals 

derived; Catalase—bovine liver; Animal lipase; Pancreatin; Pepsin; and 

Trypsin).

 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with 

OFPA and NOP): 

Federal register notice of the sunset of these materials elicited no public 

comments against re-listing. 

Review of the original recommendation, historical documents, and public 

comments does not reveal unacceptable risks to the environment, human, or 

animal health as a result of the use or manufacture of this material. There is no 

new information contradicting the original recommendation which was the basis for 

the previous NOSB decision to list this material. 

The committee recommendation for this material is attached.

NOSB Vote:

Moved: Steve DeMuri Second: Joe Dickson

Yes: 14 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recusal: 0
National Organic Standards Board

Handling Committee

Sunset 2013 Proposed Recommendation

Animal Enzymes on §205.605(a)

December 2, 2011

List: 205.605 Nonagricultural (nonorganic) substances allowed as 

ingredients in or on processed products labeled as “organic” or “made 

with organic (specified ingredients or food group(s)).” 

(a) Nonsynthetics allowed 

Committee Summary:

Federal register notice of the sunset of these materials elicited no public 

comments against re-listing. 

Review of the original recommendation, historical documents, and public 

comments does not reveal unacceptable risks to the environment, human, or 

animal health as a result of the use or manufacture of this material. There is no 

new information contradicting the original recommendation which was the basis 

for the previous NOSB decision to list this material. 

Committee Vote:

The handling committee recommends the renewal of the following substance in 

this use category as published in the final rule:

Animal enzymes—(Rennet—animals derived; Catalase—bovine liver; Animal 

lipase; Pancreatin; Pepsin; and Trypsin).

Moved: Steve DeMuri Second: Katrina Heinze

Yes: 5 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 894 

To extend the authorization of the Highlands Conservation Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2015 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN (for himself, Mr. LANCE, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. PASCRELL, 

Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. TONKO, Ms. ESTY, 

and Mr. DENT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 

Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization of the Highlands Conservation 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HIGHLANDS CONSERVATION 

4 ACT. 

5 (a) EXTENSION OF LAND CONSERVATION PROJECTS

6 IN THE HIGHLANDS REGION.—Section 4(e) of the High7 lands Conservation Act (Public Law 108–421; 118 Stat. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 894 IH

1 2377) is amended by striking ‘‘2014’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘2021’’. 

3 (b) EXTENSION OF FOREST SERVICE AND USDA 

4 PROGRAMS IN THE HIGHLANDS REGION.—Section 5(c) of 

5 the Highlands Conservation Act (Public Law 108–421; 

6 118 Stat. 2378) is amended by striking ‘‘2014’’ and in7 serting ‘‘2021’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF SPECIAL SESSIONS —NEW YORK — BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN.

August 18, 1922.

#### THE PEOPLE v. WILLIAM CAINE.

Practice — Recalling defendant from imprisonment — Retrial—Penal Law, section 2188.

This court has no jurisdiction to modify or change its judgment after the commencement of the imprisonment of the defendant.

*110Before Justices Freschi, Voorhees, and Herbert.

A motion to recall .the defendant from the Hew York County Penitentiary and to reconsider the sentence of the court.

*Armin Kohn,*for the motion.

*Joab H. Banton, District*Attorney, opposed.

Freschi, J.:

The defendant was committed on July 21, 1922, to the County Penitentiary on an indeterminate sentence upon his plea of guilty for unlawfully possessing a loaded revolver.

He now seeks a reconsideration of that sentence upon the ground that counsel was not notified to he present on the date of the final' disposition of the case. This court has no jurisdiction to modify or change its judgment at this time. Having-discharged our duty and having exhausted our authority, except to act on the report of the Parole Commission, so far as this motion is concerned we are *functus officio.*The statute controlling here provides that the imprisonment directed by the judgment shall not be suspended or interrupted after such imprisonment shall have commenced. (Penal Law, § 2188.)

Defendant may, if he be so advised, submit his petition for consideration as to the term of imprisonment to the Parole Commission. He had been in confinement since about March 1, 1922, under an indictment of murder in the first degree, when he was arraigned in this court for sentence. The time spent in jail while awaiting trial will- undoubtedly be considered by the Parole Board, and when it comes to make its report, as it must, the findings and recommendations of that commission will be before the justices constituting the court which sentenced the defendant, for approval- or disapproval.

I advise that this motion be denied.
# C_2016202EN.01015001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/150 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/150

---

Article 226

(ex Article 193 TEC)

(ex Article 193 TEC)

In the course of its duties, the European Parliament may, at the request of a quarter of its component Members, set up a temporary Committee of Inquiry to investigate, without prejudice to the powers conferred by the Treaties on other institutions or bodies, alleged contraventions or maladministration in the implementation of Union law, except where the alleged facts are being examined before a court and while the case is still subject to legal proceedings.

The temporary Committee of Inquiry shall cease to exist on the submission of its report.

The detailed provisions governing the exercise of the right of inquiry shall be determined by the European Parliament, acting by means of regulations on its own initiative in accordance with a special legislative procedure, after obtaining the consent of the Council and the Commission.

---
**Exhibit 99.7**

 
|        |                                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580     | FAX (713)   651-0849 |
|   | 1100 LOUISIANA    SUITE 3800 | HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5235 | TELEPHONE (713)   651-9191 |
|        |                                             |  |  |

 

February 24, 2013

 

We hereby consent to the use of and reference to Ryder Scott Company L.P., and the information derived from our opinion  letter  concerning  our evaluation of  certain oil and gas properties of Nexen Inc. (the “Corporation”) located in the United States Gulf of Mexico, as of December 31, 2012 (the “Opinion”), contained in the sections entitled “Reserves, Production and Related Information” and “Interests of Experts” in the Annual Information Form of the Corporation dated February 24, 2013, which is included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Form 40-F”), as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) the Form 40-F; (ii) the Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-119276, 333-118019 and 333-13574), (iii) the Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-172612, 333-142670, 333-142652 and 333-84786), and (iv) the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-174753), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable. We further consent to the Corporation filing the Opinion with any Canadian or United States securities commission or regulatory authority as it relates to the above mentioned filings.

 

 
|   | /s/ Ryder Scott Company,   L.P.     |
|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   |                                |
|   |                                |
|   | **RYDER   SCOTT COMPANY L.P.**      |
|   | TBPE Firm Registration No.   F-1580 |

 

SUITE  600,  1015  4TH  STREET, S.W. CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4 TEL (403) 262-2799   FAX (403) 262-2790

621  17TH STREET, SUITE 1550   DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501 TEL (303) 623-9147   FAX (303) 623-4258

 

1

----