alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### T. D. B., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. J-76-907.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 14, 1977.

*578R. Jay Cook, Muskogee, for appellant.

James E. Edmondson, Asst. Dist. Atty., Muskogee, County, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:

T. D. B., a juvenile, appeals from the order of the Juvenile Division of the District Court, Muskogee County, Case No. JF-76-101, waiving jurisdiction over him and empowering the State to prosecute him as an adult for the crime of Murder in the First Degree.

On the 10th of September, 1976, the juvenile made his initial appearance. At this time, it was discovered that the State’s petition lacked a valid verification, in that the signature of Julian K. Fite, the verifying party, had not been properly attested. Whereupon, the presiding judge appended his signature as the attesting official, although Mr. Fite was not then present, and the Judge had not been present when the petition was verified. The Appellant’s motion to quash said petition was overruled and the certification hearing was subsequently had. From said hearing the appellant has perfected a timely appeal.

Due to the determinative nature of the appellant’s second assignment of error, this Court need not address the other assignments of error raised by the appellant in this case. The appellant contends that the petition to certify him to stand trial as an adult was defective because of improper verification and that, therefore, the court should have sustained his motion to quash said petition. A review of the record substantiates the appellant’s averment that the verification signed by Julian K. Fite, District Attorney for* Muskogee County, was not subscribed in the presence of the witnessing official, but, in fact, when the witnessing official appended his signature Mr. Fite was not even in his presence.

Clearly, 10 O.S.Supp. 176, § 1103 requires that the petition be verified. Further, this Court in *Ivy v. State,*Okl.Cr., 414 P.2d 1007 (1966) held that a verification is defective unless sworn to and signed before the attesting officer. In *Cote v. State,*92 Okl.Cr. 316, 223 P.2d 155, 157 (1950) this Court stated that we do not believe that an affidavit can be made by proxy but the affiant must do some unequivocal act in the presence of the magistrate showing that he intended to take the oath.

We hold the petition in this case was not properly verified in compliance with the requirements of 10 O.S.Supp. 1976, § 1103, which in pertinent part states: “The petition. *shall*be verified . . . Without proper verification the Court was without authority to conduct the certification hearing and waive juvenile jurisdiction.

Accordingly we reverse and remand with directions to file a proper petition and proceed without delay.

BLISS and BRETT, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Cameryn Entertainment Company, Inc., Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

—Weiss, J. P.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 28, 1989, which assessed Cameryn Entertainment Company, Inc. for additional unemployment insurance contributions.

Cameryn Entertainment Company, Inc., which is engaged in the business of supplying entertainment talent for single-performance events, has appealed the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that its relationship with performers was that of employer-employee rather than an independent contractor relationship. Cameryn contends that the Board’s conclusion is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. We disagree and accordingly affirm the Board’s decision.

Cameryn provides entertainment for private parties and events. It negotiates and enters into contractual arrangements with the clients to supply entertainment, selecting acts from its inventory of prescreened talent to perform at the events. The selected performers may accept or reject assignments. Similarly, performers are free to accept work from any source. The performers are instructed as to the date, time and place of the performances and are generally told what type of entertainment to provide. The clients pay their contractual sum to Cameryn. Cameryn pays the performers based upon the going rate or a negotiated fee generally unrelated to the contract sums with the clients. Cameryn carries general liability insurance for itself in the event that an accident or injury occurs during a performance.

The existence of an employer-employee relationship is an issue of fact. If supported by substantial evidence, the Board’s determination is conclusive, even where the record could *860support a different conclusion *(Matter of Villa Maria Inst. of Music [Ross]*54 NY2d 691, 693; *Matter of Via Otto Ristorante [Hartnett]*158 AD2d 825; *Matter of Studio Theatre School Corp. [Roberts]*99 AD2d 637). Involved here are professional entertainers providing services not readily subject to close supervision and control *(see, Matter of Captain Kishka, [Hart-nett]*158 AD2d 814, 815, *lv denied*76 NY2d 708). The foregoing evidence is sufficient to support the Board’s finding that an employment relationship existed.

Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our reports dated January 30, 2002 included (or incorporated by reference) in this
Form 10-K into Dole Food Company, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 Registration Nos. 33-41480, 33-64984, 333-07849, and 333-61689; Form S-8 Registration Nos. 2-87475,
33-594, 33-28782, 33-60641, 33-60643, 33-42152, 333-06949, 333-13739 and 333-66486; and Form N-2 Registration Nos. 333-325 and 811-7499.

ARTHUR
ANDERSEN LLP

Los
Angeles, California
March 28, 2002

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9955]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act; Audit Committee Meeting of the Board of Directors

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., Monday, April 30, 2012.

PLACE: 1325 G Street NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.

STATUS: Open.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate 
Secretary, (202) 220-2376; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#385d5059545478564f16574a5f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c49444d40406c425b02435e4b">[email protected]</span></a>.

AGENDA: 
I. Call To Order
II. Mid Year Review Discussion
III. Executive Session with Internal Audit Director
IV. Executive Session with Officers: Pending Litigation
V. Internal Audit Report with Management's Response
VI. Amendment to the FY 2012 Internal Audit Plan
VII. FY'13 Risk Assessment & DRAFT Internal Audit Plan
VIII. Internal Audit Performance Scorecard
IX. Internal Audit Status Reports
X. External Audit Updates
XI. National Foreclosure Mitigation Counseling (NFMC)/Emergency 
Homeowners Loan Program (EHLP) Update
XII. CFO Update
XIII. OHTS Watch List
XIV. Adjournment

Erica Hall,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9955 Filed 4-20-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Finlay Enterprises, Inc., (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect to
the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended October
29, 2005 (the "Report") that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: December 8, 2005

                                        /s/ Bruce Zurlnick
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Bruce E. Zurlnick
                                        Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
```
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 1

SECTION 1

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Article 231

(ex Article 198 TEC)

(ex Article 198 TEC)

Save as otherwise provided in the Treaties, the European Parliament shall act by a majority of the votes cast.

The Rules of Procedure shall determine the quorum.

---
Dewy Kidd

P.O. Box 1102

Big Spring, Texas 70721

432.264.7869

Certified Mail Receipt: 7014 0150 0000 4731 2506

April 14, 2015

Amy Strother

Third District of Texas Court of Appeals

P.O. Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711

Court of Appeals No. 03-14-00805-CV

Dear Amy:

I am requesting an additional sixty day extension.

As a result of my brother being hit in a head on collision last Dec. 15, 2014, he is going to

have surgery on his spine.

I have to go to No. California to help him. My mother is 88 years old, has advanced dementia

and can no longer drive. There's no one else to help him get home from the hospital and stay

with him a week or so until he can at least walk around.

Ispoke with Mr.Adam Bitter, the state's legal counsel who has no objection to this request.

I thank the court.

Cordially,

(^Z^^^^^

Dewy Kidd

cf: Mr. Adam Bitter

RECEIVED

APR 2 0 2015

THIRD COURT OFAPPEALS
E50b M731 DDDD DISD 70m

7SdtXa^ CUtofa,

lll,llll.,ll„..,l.lll..l,>..,lll

787ii$2547
# C_2016202EN.01011401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/114 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/114

---

Article 152

The Union recognises and promotes the role of the social partners at its level, taking into account the diversity of national systems. It shall facilitate dialogue between the social partners, respecting their autonomy.

The Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment shall contribute to social dialogue.

---
Matthew Rodriquez Secret a ry f or En v ironm ental Prot ection July 18, 2014 Mr. Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator 

# Air Resources Board Mary D . Nichols, Chairman

100 1 I Street • P . O . Bo x 2815 Sacramento , Californ ia 958 1 2 • www .arb . ca.gov

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco , California 94105 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: Edmund G . Brown Jr. Gov ern or

On July 7, 2009, the Air Resources Board (ARB) submitted a certification letter to the U . S . Environmental Protection Agency (U . S . EPA) addressing Clean Air Act (CAA) infrastructure requirements for the 2006 PM2 .5 national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) including those for i nterstate transport as required by U.S . EPA guidance at that time. You staff has informed us that as a result of recent litigation , additional analysis is now needed to address the interstate transport element of the Infrastructure SIP. As requested , we are withdrawing our July 7 , 2009 letter and will work with your staff to develop the additional information needed . ARB will prepare a revised PM2 . 5 transport element addressing both the 2006 and 2012 PM2 . 5 standards , and submit a SIP revision to address any outstanding requirements . If your staff has any questions , please have them contact Ms. Sylvia Vanderspek , Chief, Air Quality Planning Branch, at (916) 324-7163 , or via email at svanders@arb.ca . gov . Sincerely ,



# Ri **~t ~**  Executive



# o~f U

cc : See next page .

The energy chall enge f aci ng Ca l if

ornia is rea l. Every Cali f ornian n eeds to ta k e immedi ate act i on to reduce energy consumption. For a list o f sim ple ways you can reduce d emand an d c ut your en ergy costs, see our websi t e : http ://www.arb.ca.gov . Ca lifornia E nvironm e ntal P rotection Ag e ncy Printed on Recycl ed PaperMr. Jared Blumenfeld July 18, 2014 Page 2 cc : Matt Lakin, Chief Air Planning Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco , California 941 05 Ms. Sylvia Vanderspek , Chief Air Quality Planning Branch Air Quality Planning and Science DivisionMr . Jared Blumenfeld July 18 , 2014 Page 3 bee : Lynn Terry , EO Kurt Karperos, AQPS Karen Magliano, AQPS Webster Tasat , AQPS Kasia Turkiewiez, AQPS AQPS #9206 

### I ARB #18642 X:\PM25-2012 SIPs for 2006 standard\Submittals to U.S . EPA\Withdrawal Letter 7.11.2014 . doe



### - -
# C_2016202EN.01005801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/58

---

Article 25

(ex Article 22 TEC)

(ex Article 22 TEC)

The Commission shall report to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Economic and Social Committee every three years on the application of the provisions of this Part. This report shall take account of the development of the Union.

On this basis, and without prejudice to the other provisions of the Treaties, the Council, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may adopt provisions to strengthen or to add to the rights listed in Article 20(2). These provisions shall enter into force after their approval by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART ONE

PRINCIPLES

PRINCIPLES

TITLE II

PROVISIONS HAVING GENERAL APPLICATION

PROVISIONS HAVING GENERAL APPLICATION

Article 8

(ex Article 3(2) TEC)
   (1)

(ex Article 3(2) TEC)

1

In all its activities, the Union shall aim to eliminate inequalities, and to promote equality, between men and women.

---

(1)  These references are merely indicative. For more ample information, please refer to the tables of equivalences between the old and the new numbering of the Treaties.

1

---
# C_2016202EN.01034701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/347 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/347

---

27.   Declaration on Article 85(1), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 85(1), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference considers that the regulations referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 85(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should take into account national rules and practices relating to the initiation of criminal investigations.

---
EXHIBIT 31(iv)

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, John E. Kirksey, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Camco Financial Corporation; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: July 13, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ John E. Kirksey                                                  
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | John E. Kirksey Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

BonorrbloJ. 5. Xurohlron BresutfvaDlraotor **State** Dopsrtauntof Publb woli8n Aurtln, Tbxar

mar sir:

"DOOB the 1 oxpbnaadpar yea DepondeatWdld 0r the a0mf

ther llaitetton~,rbatriobe providbb **by** law, thb

0 ($12)per moath for 8UOh ohll.er*n

that tki bBIoU& t0 b0 out 0r m4t9 

### r&i&- oneMklliOll,

nre HundredThousandDollar8 ($L,500,000) per Y-r. The Legi31~turemay impore residential reetrlotloa~ 8pd mob other reatsiotion5, limltetlons,end rwdlationrr 6P to it zlay

sreasxpedlent. (%aphsei#OWE)Bonerable J. 9. Muohlaen, Page 8

“The Lsglslaturo ahall have the authority to eoobpt rmm the Ooverment or the Vnlted State8 8uoh flnenolal eaalatinosta destitute ohlldrenaa that Ooverment my 0rr0r not i5oonelatmt wltb the restriotione herein above provlC00.~ The ghraus Wuoh aeaistenoe* 88 first used in the above oonatitutional provision refer8 qmoifioally to t.ho oath payments to reoipisnta or eight and twelve Bollam, not inoluding any adminlstratlvo l xpelue whloh might hero boon inaurred kn making suoh paymentr. It seams reasonable to l uppos6 that the fmmephrase, Vuoh **888i8taxi~b ”**  **ShOtid bb**  given the aan% zeanirywhen uaad ior the inoond tim, In the lamaa*ntono6,

rith r43reronoa to the #1,800,000 annual Mmlta**tioa.** It la not without a&nlfioaaob, we think, that In the oognata oonstitutlonal sm6ndmnt8, Sootion Slb authorizing old age aaeiatanos puymmrnt.8 and Sootion 610, authoriring aid to the needy blind, thsro was providmb a slnilar llmitatien upon the amountof aaalstanoewhich might ba pai4 to oaoh reolpiaat, but no limitation upon the sd.minlstretlvs expondltursa nhioh might be rrsds in order 0rre0tividp to **diatributb** the l srletrnoe authorized. saotion sld la awrw reatrlotivb than thm greoadin& two amand:~entir in that It plaoaa a limitatlon upon the total annual bmefit paymmht6 to beatitutb OhildTbn.

It ia our opinion that thr $lrWOrOOO annual limitation \~pon the amount thst may ba spent ror auaiatano~ to dsatltuta ohildren, a8 oontalnfd in Artiola III, Ssotlon51.6 0r the Tbxsa ~onstitutlon appliers only to aotuel **bensilt** payments, and tbst the Leglslatum la authorlrod to appropri~ata In ddition to **.$1,5oo,c~oo** aa5uallyr0r timit **paymbnta** to deatltuta ohlldren, suoh further 8uma a8 it may deem to ba neoessaryror the cffioient atmnistre.tion ot the pro&?rema 

# By77kl..GQ?L~

4slter R. Yooh

**heei6teUt** ERXtJP
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

32 34 36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 420TH DISTRICT COURT OF NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 18th

day of February, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JAMES PATRICK CAPPS, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00339-CR; Trial Court No. F1421321

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal 

herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by 

this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the 

decision be certified to the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 7

th day of April, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
#### David Harper et al., Appellants, v Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Co., Respondent.

—Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied, complaint reinstated and summary judgment granted in part to plaintiffs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in determining that, as a matter of law, an All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) was not a motor vehicle within the scope of plaintiff’s uninsured motorist coverage. The insurance policy issued by defendant covers injuries resulting from an accident with an uninsured automobile. As a matter of law, the coverage extends to all motor vehicles as defined by Vehicle and Traffic Law § 125 *(see,*Insurance Law § 5202 [a]; *Matter of Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Wagoner,*45 NY2d 581; *Matter of Askey [General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp.],*30 AD2d 632, *affd*24 NY2d 937; *see also,*Insurance Law § 3420 *[f]*[1]).

Vehicle and Traffic Law § 125 defines a motor vehicle as every vehicle operated or driven upon a public highway and propelled by any power other than muscular power. The statute, as it existed at the time of the subject accident, did not exclude ATVs (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 125 now excludes ATVs, but applies only to actions accruing after Jan. 1, 1987; the action here accrued on May 13, 1986).

*1032Because no specific exclusion for AT Vs existed, we may presume that the Legislature intended that AT Vs were not excluded from the statutory definition of motor vehicles *(see, Eaton v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.,*56 NY2d 340, 346; McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 240; *see also, Matter of Buffalo Columbus Hosp. v Axelrod,*165 AD2d 605). Thus, consistent with this State’s policy of protecting its citizens from uninsured motorists on its highways *(see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Shaw,*52 NY2d 818, 819-820), we conclude that defendant is obligated to provide plaintiffs with uninsured motorist benefits for injuries caused by the uninsured ATV operator. Because this issue is solely a question of law, we grant plaintiffs partial summary judgment declaring that obligation *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b], [e]). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Orleans County, Miles, J.—Declaratory Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.