alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 4 THROUGH 7 OF THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 29, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-29-2000
<CASH>                                         408,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,794
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (35,698)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,640,127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,160,598
<PP&E>                                       4,093,226
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,985,594)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,704,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,880,587
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,867
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,112,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,704,324
<SALES>                                      2,536,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,536,146
<CGS>                                          781,253
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,112,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               175,954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (533,147)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (533,147)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (533,147)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Medical Security
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Samuel V. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
John R. Lombardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Samuel V. Miller                              /s/ John R. Lombardi
-----------------------                           -----------------------
Samuel V. Miller                                  John R. Lombardi
Chief Executive Officer                           Chief Financial Officer

November 2, 2004                                  November 4, 2004

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
20222

#### State v. Napoleon

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the Fund) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Kenneth I. Denos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                         
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Dated: May 14, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Kenneth I. Denos                    
|                    |  |  |  | Kenneth I. Denos Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-10842

Conference Calendar

 

ALFREDO ALVAREZ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-327

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Alfredo Alvarez, federal prisoner # 30170-077, appeals the

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of

jurisdiction because it was not filed in the district of his

incarceration. Alvarez argues that he should be allowed to

proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 because the 28 U.S.C. § 2255

remedy is inadequate to raise his Bailey v. United States, 516

U.S. 137 (1995) claim. He argues in the alternative that the
No. 05-10842

-2-

district court should have construed his petition as an amendment

to his initial § 2255 motion. 

A § 2241 petition must be filed in the district where the

prisoner is incarcerated; as the sentencing court, the district

court indeed lacked jurisdiction to entertain Alvarez’s pleading

as a § 2241 petition. Hooker v. Sivley, 187 F.3d 680, 681-82

(5th Cir. 1999). Alvarez’s pleading challenged his conviction

and sentence based on errors that allegedly occurred during the

criminal proceedings; these claims should have been brought in a

§ 2255 proceeding. Davis v. Fechtel, 150 F.3d 486, 490 (5th Cir.

1998). Alvarez has already unsuccessfully sought § 2255 relief,

and, therefore, the instant pleading, which raised claims that

were or could have been raised in a prior motion, was successive. 

United States v. Orozco-Ramirez, 211 F.3d 862, 867 (5th Cir.

2000). Alvarez had not received prior permission from us to file

a successive § 2255 motion; consequently, the district court was

without jurisdiction to construe his petition as a § 2255 motion. 

Hooker, 187 F.3d at 681-82. The dismissal for lack of

jurisdiction was therefore appropriate.

Finally, Alvarez’s contentions that (1) the district court

erred in withdrawing the 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) reference of his case

to the magistrate judge; (2) the district court abused its

discretion in denying him an evidentiary hearing; (3) his § 2241

petition was supported by facts which demonstrate his entitlement

to relief; and (4) the district court abused its discretion in
No. 05-10842

-3-

failing to consider the merits of his claims are inadequately

briefed and are therefore waived. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d

222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
#### Orville Chester GARRISON, Petitioner, v. Honorable Albert L. REEVES, Judge, United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Western Division, Kansas City, Missouri, and A. L. Arnold, Clerk Thereof.

No. 462.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 22, 1939.

PER CURIAM.

Motion of petitioner for leave to file and docket petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00115-CR

Lloyd RECTOR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CR-4029B

Honorable George H. Godwin, Judge Presiding1

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED April 15, 2015.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

1 Sitting by assignment.
Revised MATS preamble 12/16/2011 08:09 PM

From: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450

EO12866NESHAPMACT_NSPSforUtilitiesMAT S2060_AP52Final20111216a.docx

Redline 121611a vs. 121611.docx
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CertificationOf Periodic Report**

 

I, Charles W. Fischer,President and Chief Executive Officer of Nexen Inc., a Canadian Corporation(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | February 21, 2008 | /s/ Charles W. Fischer      |
|--------|------------------------|-----------------------------|
|   |                   | Charles W. Fischer          |
|   |                   | President                   |
|   |                   | and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Nexen Inc.and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff on request.

 

----
#### H.A.M.S. COMPANY, Herbert Schlereth, Martin Slisco and Andrew Slisco, Appellants, v. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS OF ALASKA, INC., an Alaskan Corporation, and Tote’Em Steel, Ltd., Appellees.

No. 1415.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

May 26, 1977.

ORDER

Our decision in *H.A.M.S. Company et*al. *v. Electrical Contractors of Alaska, Inc. et al.,*563 P.2d 258 (Opinion No. 1415, May 6, 1977), requiring verification that the facts stated in lien claims are true, will be otherwise applicable only to the following cases:

1. Cases in which trial was commenced prior to May 6, 1977, but which have not been submitted to the trier of fact for decision;

2. Cases in which prior to submission to the trier of fact for decision there has been an express objection that the verification attached to a lien claim fails to meet the requirements of AS 34.35.070(c)(5);

3. Cases in which the trial commences after the date of our opinion; and

4. Cases pending on direct appeal on the date of our opinion, in which objection was made in the trial court and thereafter asserted as an issue on appeal that the verification attached to a lien claim fails to meet the requirements of AS 34.35.070(c)(5).

By direction of the Court.

RABINOWITZ, J., dissents from the order.
EXHIBIT 31.1
IEA Income Fund XII, L.P.
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
               I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
               1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income FundXII, L.P. (the “Registrant”);
               2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
               3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
               4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:
                    (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
                    (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on ourevaluation; and
                    (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
               5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
                    (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
                    (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004
/s/ DENNIS J TIETZDennis J TietzPresident of CCC(Chief Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350



(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the periodic report of Dynegy Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce A. Williamson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                                          
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 20, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/ BRUCE A. WILLIAMSON                                  
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Bruce A. Williamson President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynegy Inc. and will be retained by Dynegy Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 82399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25990]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-1295]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Groff NA 
Hemplex LLC

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Groff NA Hemplex LLC. has applied to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may submit electronic comments on or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before 
January 23, 2024. Such persons may also file a written request for a 
hearing on the application on or before January 23, 2024.

ADDRESSES: The Drug Enforcement Administration requires that all 
comments be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal, which provides the ability to type short comments directly into 
the comment field on the web page or attach a file for lengthier 
comments. Please go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the 
online instructions at that site for submitting comments. Upon 
submission of your comment, you will receive a Comment Tracking Number. 
Please be aware that submitted comments are not instantaneously 
available for public view on https://www.regulations.gov. If you have 
received a Comment Tracking Number, your comment has been successfully 
submitted and there is no need to resubmit the same comment.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this 
is notice that on September 19, 2023, Groff NA Hemplex LLC., 2218 South 
Queen Street, York, Pennsylvania 17402, applied to be registered as a 
bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled 
substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marihuana Extract......................     7350  I
Marihuana..............................     7360  I
Tetrahydrocannabinols..................     7370  I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company is federally authorized to conduct cultivation 
activities in order to bulk manufacture the listed controlled 
substances for internal use and for sale to federally registered 
research investigators. No other activities for these drug codes are 
authorized for this registration.

Claude Redd,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-25990 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.2





Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code





In connection with the Quarterly Report of OHA Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cory E. Gilbert, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:May 15, 2017/s/ Cory E. GilbertCory E. GilbertChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                         Second Amendment to Memorandum
                           OEM Manufacturing Agreement



         The Memorandum OEM Manufacturing Agreement ("MOEMMA") with an effective
date of January 9, 2002 by and among EchoStar Satellite Corporation, EchoStar
Technologies Corporation and Thomson multimedia, Inc. is hereby amended as
follows:

         1.       The 6th sentence of Section 2.4 is amended to read:

         In the event that for any reason an agreement for [CONFIDENTIAL
         INFORMATION REDACTED] has not been executed by License ETC and ESC
         [CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REDACTED], then notwithstanding anything else
         in this MOEMMA to the contrary, this MOEMMA shall terminate.

         2.       The MOEMMA shall remain in all other respects unchanged.


Echostar Satellite Corporation      Echostar Technologies Corporation

By:                                 By:
         -------------------------          ---------------------------
Title:                              Title:
         -------------------------          ---------------------------
Date:                               Date:
         -------------------------          ---------------------------

Thomson multimedia Inc.

By:
         -------------------------
Title:
         -------------------------
Date:
         -------------------------
May 2, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ROWENA MANUELA KLINK ER , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00160

- CR NO. 14

- 12

- 00161

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED and that this decision be
certified below for observan ce.