alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
99.6




CEO
AND CFO SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION











February
5, 2010








Securities
and Exchange Commission


450 Fifth
Street, N.W


Washington,
D.C. 20549








Ladies
and Gentlemen:





The
certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or
Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.




Claude
Mongeau, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Luc Jobin, Executive
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, of Canadian National Railway
Company, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Exchange Act; and




2.
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Canadian
      National Railway Company.









/s/ Claude
      Mongeau
            
            /s/Luc
      JobinClaude
      Mongeau
            
            Luc
      JobinPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
            
            Executive
      Vice-President andChief
      Financial Officer
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XIX

RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SPACE

RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SPACE

Article 182

(ex Article 166 TEC)

(ex Article 166 TEC)

1.   A multiannual framework programme, setting out all the activities of the Union, shall be adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure after consulting the Economic and Social Committee.

The framework programme shall:

| — | establish the scientific and technological objectives to be achieved by the activities provided for in Article 180 and fix the relevant priorities, |
| --- | --- |

—

establish the scientific and technological objectives to be achieved by the activities provided for in Article 180 and fix the relevant priorities,

| — | indicate the broad lines of such activities, |
| --- | --- |

—

indicate the broad lines of such activities,

| — | fix the maximum overall amount and the detailed rules for Union financial participation in the framework programme and the respective shares in each of the activities provided for. |
| --- | --- |

—

fix the maximum overall amount and the detailed rules for Union financial participation in the framework programme and the respective shares in each of the activities provided for.

2.   The framework programme shall be adapted or supplemented as the situation changes.

3.   The framework programme shall be implemented through specific programmes developed within each activity. Each specific programme shall define the detailed rules for implementing it, fix its duration and provide for the means deemed necessary. The sum of the amounts deemed necessary, fixed in the specific programmes, may not exceed the overall maximum amount fixed for the framework programme and each activity.

4.   The Council, acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, shall adopt the specific programmes.

5.   As a complement to the activities planned in the multiannual framework programme, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, shall establish the measures necessary for the implementation of the European research area.

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







The Board of Directors

Cagles, Inc. and Subsidiary

Atlanta, Georgia





We consent to the inclusion of our report dated May 13, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cagles, Inc. and Subsidiary as of April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years ended April 2, 2005, April 3, 2004 and March 29, 2003, which report has been included in the Annual Report to Stockholders and in the Form 10-K Annual Report of Cagles, Inc. and Subsidiary.











Moore Stephens Frost, PLC





Little Rock, Arkansas

June 10, 2005
Lexter Kossie#700661

William McConnell Unit

3001 South Emily Drive

Beeville, Texas 78102

April 26, 2015

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

P.O. BOX 12308, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711

RE: WR NOs. 10,978-01 thru 10,978-16

Tr.Ct.NOs. 679887-A thru 679887-K

185th District Court - Harris County

to)<n& 01)07,03, vV,Q®pu>~5

COURT RECBVED OCRIMING AppvJLS IN

W 29 2015

^Acesfe,Cferfc •

Dear Clerk:

Recently I have been cited for abuse of the writ. In

order for me to show that the claims I intend to raise, in my

subsequent writ are not barred by Sec 4 I am requesting the

docket sheet of all the writs mentioned above with a list of

all of the claims presented in each of those application. With

out a list of all of the claims I cannot show that the claims

I intend to raise have not been raised before in those prior

applications.

Thank you for any consideration given in this matter.

Sincerely,

cc:File

^e^Z^'fl^J^t

Lextetr- Kennon Kossie
You are here: EPA Home Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Science

Coordination and Policy Scientific Advisory Panel SAP Meetings 2013 SAP Meetings 

March 19-21, 2013 SAP Meeting 

March 19-21, 2013: Scientific Issues Concerning 

the Draft Product Performance Data Needs 

Assessment for Products Claiming Efficacy 

Against Invertebrate Pests 

On this page: 

Federal Register Notice 

Directions and Other Logistics Information 

Agenda 

Panel Members 

Meeting Materials 

Meeting Minutes 

Meeting Transcript 

You will need Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's 

PDF page to learn more. 

Federal Register Notice 

Federal Register Notice announcing this meeting. 

Directions and Other Logistics Information 

EPA, Airport, Metro

Agenda 

Agenda (PDF, 8p. 120kb) 

Meetings 

2013 

2012 

2011 

2010 

2009 

2008 

2007 

2006 

2005 

2004 

2003 

2002 

2001 

2000 

1999 

1998 

1997 

1996 

Scientific Advisory Panel

http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/2013/031913meeting.html

Last updated on Friday, October 18, 2013

March 19-21, 2013 SAP Meeting | Scientific Advisory Panel | US EPA Page 1 of 2

http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/2013/031913meeting.html 10/18/2013
 

Panel Members 

Panel Members (PDF, 30kb, 3pp) 

Biosketches of Science Review Board members (PDF, 27.5 kb, 4pp) 

Meeting Materials 

NOTE: All documents for this meeting (including additional background 

documents and public comments) will be available in the OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0574. Some of these documents may be available 

online in the FDMS Docket System located at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Copyright protected material and material otherwise subject to protection is not 

placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only at the OPP Regulatory 

Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg), 2777 S. Crystal 

Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 

a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket 

Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805 .

Meeting Minutes 

Meeting Minutes (79 pp., 24 MB) 

March 19-21, 2013 SAP Meeting | Scientific Advisory Panel | US EPA Page 2 of 2

http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/2013/031913meeting.html 10/18/2013
First Department,

June, 1991

(June 4, 1991)

#### Leonell McQueen, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

—Petition in CPLR article 78 proceeding, transferred to this court by order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jawn A. Sandifer, J.), entered on or about November 1, 1990, by which petitioner Leonell McQueen seeks to annul a determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority dated April 11, 1990, which terminated her tenancy, unanimously granted, and the determination annulled, without costs.

Following the non-desirability tenancy hearing administratively conducted by respondent Authority, at which the Hearing Officer found petitioner’s 14-year personal tenancy record to be "perfect”, a termination order nonetheless issued based entirely on the narcotics activity and conviction of petitioner’s 23-year old son, Shawn McQueen. Petitioner challenges her eviction on the ground, *inter alia,*that at the time of the hearing Shawn had permanently moved out of petitioner’s apartment.

Paragraph 6 (d) of the Authority’s Termination of Tenancy Procedures provides: "If the charges brought against the tenant are based upon the Non-Desirable acts, conduct or behavior of a person (the 'Offender’) other than the tenant, it is the Housing Authority’s responsibility to prove that the offender occupied the premises at the time of the offense. However, even if the Housing Authority proves this, the tenant may still show that the offender has permanently moved out by the time of the hearing.”

In addition, paragraph 6 (d) provides that the tenant may avoid the penalty of losing his or her apartment if "(i) at the hearing on the charge(s), the tenant claims the offender has *302left the tenant’s apartment permanently; and (ii) the tenant presents evidence to the Hearing Officer to support this claim.”

This section further provides, in pertinent part that "the Authority may challenge this evidence before the Hearing Officer. Nothing contained in this paragraph 6 (d) is meant to limit the tenant’s right to offer any evidence to the Hearing Officer that an offender is no longer occupying the tenant’s apartment, including any spoken or written statement by the tenant or other persons.”

At the hearing petitioner presented cogent evidence not only that Shawn did not reside at petitioner’s apartment (he was incarcerated), but also that upon his release he had made firm arrangements to reside elsewhere. Respondent offered no substantial evidence to the contrary. Accordingly it follows that respondent’s determination, lacking substantial evidentiary support upon the decisive issue, must be viewed as arbitrary and capricious and must be annulled *(Matter of Sled Hill Cafe v Hostetter,*22 NY2d 607). Since it is nowhere suggested that petitioner or her apartment was ever implicated in any culpable conduct, remand for consideration of a lesser penalty is inappropriate here *(cf., Matter of Brown v Popolizio,*166 AD2d 44; *Matter of Barriera v Popolizio,*144 AD2d 251). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach and Asch, JJ.
United States Department of Agriculture

USDA is an equal opportunity employer, provider, and lender.

NOTICE OF PEANUT SALE

FOR RELEASE AT 1:30 P.M. CT February 26, 2021

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of peanuts. The peanuts were sold 

under Peanut Invitation No. 22 dated February 18, 2021.

Catalog Lot Catalog Location Purchaser Tons Sold Bid Price (per ton) CCC Revenue Peanut Type

1 Blakely, GA Birdsong 

Corporation 7.19 $450.00 $ 3,235.50 Runner
#### STATE of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Michael THORNTON, Respondent.

No. 3764.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Sept. 15, 1978.

*887Steven J. Call, Asst. Dist. Atty., Harry L. Davis, Dist. Atty., Fairbanks, Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for petitioner.

Mark E. Ashburn, Asst. Public Defender, Fairbanks, Brian Shortell, Public Defender, Anchorage, for respondent.

Before BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice, RA-BINOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, Justices.

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.

This matter is before us on the State of Alaska’s petition for review.1 The issue presented is nearly identical to the one decided by this court in *State v. Glass,*583 P.2d 872 (Alaska 1978).

In the case at bar the superior court entered an order suppressing evidence consisting of tape recordings of conversations between respondent Michael Thornton and Phillip Herían, a police informant. Those conversations related to various sales of cocaine allegedly made by Thornton. All such conversations were recorded by Herían or with Herian’s consent, but without the prior knowledge of Thornton. Some of the conversations occurred on the telephone. Others took place in Herian’s home. The recordings were made without benefit of a search warrant or other order of the court.

The superior court ruled that any electronic surveillance or recording of a conversation between persons “in their homes, in others’ homes, in public places or elsewhere,” made without either a search warrant or a showing that it was impossible to obtain a search warrant, and notwithstanding that such surveillance or recording was done by or with the consent of one party to the conversation, violates the constitutional rights of a party to the conversation who was not aware of such surveillance or recording.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in *State v. Glass, supra,*we hold that the recording of the conversations in this case violated Thornton's rights under art. I, §§14 and 22 of the Alaska Constitution.

Accordingly, the superior court’s order is AFFIRMED.

BURKE, J., dissents.

1

. *See*Appellate Rules 23 and 24.

BURKE, Justice,

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in *State v. Glass,*583 P.2d 872 (Alaska 1978), I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the electronic monitoring and recording of the defendant’s conversations violated his rights under art. I, §§ 14 and 22 of the Constitution of Alaska. Thus, I would reverse the superior court’s suppression order.
# EUR-Lex - 12012M049 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M049

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE VI: FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 49 (ex Article 49 TEU) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0043 - 0043 *

Article 49

(ex Article 49 TEU)

Any European State which respects the values referred to in Article 2 and is committed to promoting them may apply to become a member of the Union. The European Parliament and national Parliaments shall be notified of this application. The applicant State shall address its application to the Council, which shall act unanimously after consulting the Commission and after receiving the consent of the European Parliament, which shall act by a majority of its component members. The conditions of eligibility agreed upon by the European Council shall be taken into account.

The conditions of admission and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the Union is founded, which such admission entails, shall be the subject of an agreement between the Member States and the applicant State. This agreement shall be submitted for ratification by all the contracting States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                       |  |                                                  
|-------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|NAME                                   |  | STATE OR COUNTRY OF ORGANIZATION OR INCORPORATION
|LUBCO, Inc.                            |  | Delaware                                         
|Lubys Bevco, Inc.                     |  | Texas                                            
|Lubys Holdings, Inc.                  |  | Delaware                                         
|Lubys Limited Partner, Inc.           |  | Delaware                                         
|Lubys Management, Inc.                |  | Delaware                                         
|Lubys Restaurants Limited Partnership |  | Texas
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART ONE

PRINCIPLES

PRINCIPLES

Article 4

1.   The provisions of the Schengen acquis as referred to in the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Schengen Protocol’), annexed to the TEU and the TFEU, and the acts building upon it or otherwise related to it, listed in Annex II, as well as any further such acts adopted before the date of accession, shall be binding on, and applicable in, Croatia from the date of accession.

acquis

acquis

2.   Those provisions of the Schengen acquis as integrated into the framework of the European Union and the acts building upon it or otherwise related to it not referred to in paragraph 1, while binding on Croatia from the date of accession, shall only apply in Croatia pursuant to a Council decision to that effect, after verification, in accordance with the applicable Schengen evaluation procedures, that the necessary conditions for the application of all parts of the relevant acquis have been met in Croatia, including the effective application of all Schengen rules in accordance with the agreed common standards and with fundamental principles. That decision shall be taken by the Council, in accordance with the applicable Schengen procedures and while taking into account a Commission report confirming that Croatia continues to fulfil the commitments undertaken in its accession negotiations that are relevant for the Schengen acquis.

acquis

acquis

acquis

The Council shall take its decision, after consulting the European Parliament, acting with the unanimity of its members representing the Governments of the Member States in respect of which the provisions referred to in this paragraph have already been put into effect and of the representative of the Government of the Republic of Croatia. The members of the Council representing the Governments of Ireland and of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall take part in such a decision insofar as it relates to the provisions of the Schengen acquis and the acts building upon it or otherwise related to it in which these Member States participate.

acquis

---
# C_2016202EN.01030301.xml

| | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/303 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/303

---

PROTOCOL (No 23)

ON EXTERNAL RELATIONS OF THE MEMBER STATES WITH REGARD TO THE CROSSING OF EXTERNAL BORDERS

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the need of the Member States to ensure effective controls at their external borders, in cooperation with third countries where appropriate,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

The provisions on the measures on the crossing of external borders included in Article 77(2)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union shall be without prejudice to the competence of Member States to negotiate or conclude agreements with third countries as long as they respect Union law and other relevant international agreements.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Dec ember 8 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk Dec ember 8 , 2017

155266 (5 7 )

KENNETH BERTIN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 155266

v COA: 328885

Oakland CC: 2014

- 139901

- NO

DOUGLAS MANN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On the order of the C hief Justice , the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the

time for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be

accepted a s timely filed if submitted on or before Dec ember 28 , 2017.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE BENTLEY INTERNATIONAL, INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         299,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,692,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                   288,562
<INVENTORY>                                  1,372,059
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,433,419
<PP&E>                                         203,197
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,706,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,671,159
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       101,272
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (608,066)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,706,416
<SALES>                                      3,105,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,243,694
<CGS>                                        2,073,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,867,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                322,246
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            322,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   322,246
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
        

</TABLE>