alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 1, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00747

- CV

Marcelo GALVAN Jr. and Analicia R. Galvan

,

Appellant s

v.

Cledson Macedo de CARVALHO , Kristina Carvalho and Ja galand Co., LLC,

Appellee s

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CVH001835

- D1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellants ’ emergency motion for extension of time to file brief is hereb y

GRANTED. Time is extended to May 3, 2019.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1st day of May, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART TWO

NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP OF THE UNION

NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP OF THE UNION

Article 21

(ex Article 18 TEC)

(ex Article 18 TEC)

1.   Every citizen of the Union shall have the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and by the measures adopted to give them effect.

2.   If action by the Union should prove necessary to attain this objective and the Treaties have not provided the necessary powers, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, may adopt provisions with a view to facilitating the exercise of the rights referred to in paragraph 1.

3.   For the same purposes as those referred to in paragraph 1 and if the Treaties have not provided the necessary powers, the Council, acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure, may adopt measures concerning social security or social protection. The Council shall act unanimously after consulting the European Parliament.

---
The Honorable Richard H. Battey, Chief United States District Judge for the

1

District of South Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2894

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of South Dakota.

Royce Gay, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 18, 1997

Filed: March 18, 1998

___________

Before BEAM, HEANEY, and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Royce Gay appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to suppress

1

evidence discovered in a search of his residence and admitted against him at trial on a

charge of marijuana possession with intent to distribute. Having carefully reviewed the

record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the district court did not err.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

 ATTEST:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT INC FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,461,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              162,708,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                44,293,000
<INVENTORY>                                 23,792,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           165,515,000
<PP&E>                                     151,630,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              73,631,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             564,359,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       51,244,000
<BONDS>                                    311,389,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       150,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 198,130,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               564,359,000
<SALES>                                     48,180,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           102,793,000
<CGS>                                       24,523,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,523,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            64,374,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,516,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,398,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,982,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,993,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,989,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,989,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Goody's Family Clothing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
G. Peek, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ David G. Peek

David G. Peek
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
May 19, 2004
# C_2016202EN.01039901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/399 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/399

---

Article 29

Right of access to placement services

Everyone has the right of access to a free placement service.

---
# C_2016202EN.01006301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/63

---

Article 40

(ex Article 34 TEC)

(ex Article 34 TEC)

1.   In order to attain the objectives set out in Article 39, a common organisation of agricultural markets shall be established.

This organisation shall take one of the following forms, depending on the product concerned:

| (a) | common rules on competition; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

common rules on competition;

| (b) | compulsory coordination of the various national market organisations; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

compulsory coordination of the various national market organisations;

| (c) | a European market organisation. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

a European market organisation.

2.   The common organisation established in accordance with paragraph 1 may include all measures required to attain the objectives set out in Article 39, in particular regulation of prices, aids for the production and marketing of the various products, storage and carryover arrangements and common machinery for stabilising imports or exports.

The common organisation shall be limited to pursuit of the objectives set out in Article 39 and shall exclude any discrimination between producers or consumers within the Union.

Any common price policy shall be based on common criteria and uniform methods of calculation.

3.   In order to enable the common organisation referred to in paragraph 1 to attain its objectives, one or more agricultural guidance and guarantee funds may be set up.

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1021. LIGGION v. LIGGION.

This appeal was docketed in this court on January 29, 2015. The Appellant’s

brief, including enumerations of error, was due to be filed no later than February 18,

2015. Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a). On February 27, 2015, this Court entered an

order granting Appellant an extension of time and ordering that Appellant’s brief and

enumerations of error be filed by no later than March 13, 2015. Again, Appellant has

failed to file a brief and enumerations of error. Accordingly, the instant appeal is

hereby DISMISSED.1 Court of Appeals Rules 7 and 23 (a).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, motion to

transfer the appeal to the Supreme Court of Georgia, and motion for frivolous appeal

penalties are hereby DENIED.

04/17/2015

April 17, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection
with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2020 (the “Report”), I, John A Hardy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Dated: November 16, 2020









|EQUUS TOTAL RETURN, INC.
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ John A. Hardy       
|John A. Hardy           
|Chief Executive Officer
[Cite as Black v. McKinley Twp. , 2017-Ohio-7390.]

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

LAWRENCE BLACK

Petitioner

-vsTOWNSHIP OF MCKINLEY, CITY OF CANTON Respondents JUDGES: Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., J.

Case No. 2017CA00133

O P I N I O N

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Prohibition

JUDGMENT: Dismissed DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: August 28, 2017

APPEARANCES: For Petitioner For Respondents LAWRENCE BLACK, PRO SE NO APPEARANCE 1511 Maple Ave N.E. Canton, Ohio 44705Stark County, Case No. 2017CA00133 2

Hoffman, J.

{¶1} Petitioner, Lawrence Black, has filed a “Notice.” The pleading is not in a complaint or petition format. The notice does not contain any requested relief. The notice reads in its entirety, “Notice to this Court of Appeals of Lawrence Black’s Peremptory Writ of Prohibition. Judge Mary Falvey is forcing proceeding on Lawrence Black which was filed first by Darla S. Hinderer, and letter was to Judge Falvey 12 Jul 17. Darla S. Hinderer writting (sic) dismissed charges, Judge Falvey is attempting to try and convict.” (Citations omitted). Attached to the notice is what appears to be a proposed order for a peremptory writ of prohibition. {¶2} In order for a writ of prohibition to issue, petitioner must prove that: (1) the lower court is about to exercise judicial authority; (2) the exercise of authority is not authorized by law; and, (3) the petitioner has no other adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law if a writ of prohibition is denied. State ex rel. Keenan v. Calabrese (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 176, 178, 631 N.E.2d 119. A writ of prohibition, regarding the unauthorizedexercise of judicial power, will only be granted where the judicial officer's lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction is patent and unambiguous. Ohio Dept. of Adm. Serv., Office of Collective Bargaining v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1990), 54 Ohio St.3d 48, 562 N.E.2d

125. {¶3} The named Respondents in this case are the Township of McKinley and City of Canton. A writ of prohibition is used to limit judicial authority. The township and city do not have judicial authority, therefore, prohibition cannot lie to prevent the township or city from acting.Stark County, Case No. 2017CA00133 3

{¶4} Because prohibition does not lie against the named Respondents, the cause is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. By: Hoffman, J. Delaney, P.J. and Wise, Earle, J. concur
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1449 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3033 203rd Street in Olympia Fields, Illinois, as the ‘‘Captain Robert 

L. Martin Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2019 

Ms. KELLY of Illinois (for herself, Mr. RUSH, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. QUIGLEY, 

Mr. CASTEN of Illinois, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. 

KRISHNAMOORTHI, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. FOSTER, 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. UNDERWOOD, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. 

LAHOOD, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. SHIMKUS, and 

Mr. BOST) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3033 203rd Street in Olympia Fields, Illinois, 

as the ‘‘Captain Robert L. Martin Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN ROBERT L. MARTIN POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 3033 203rd Street in Olympia 

6 Fields, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Captain Robert L. Martin Post Office’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1449 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Robert L. 

5 Martin Post Office’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, James M. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

|   |   |   | /s/ James M. Johnson    |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |   |                         |
|   |   |   | James M. Johnson        |
|   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   | August 12, 2008         |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
# C_2016202EN.01035801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/358 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/358

---

60.   Declaration by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on Article 355 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on Article 355 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Kingdom of the Netherlands declares that an initiative for a decision, as referred to in Article 355(6) aimed at amending the status of the Netherlands Antilles and/or Aruba with regard to the Union, will be submitted only on the basis of a decision taken in conformity with the Charter for the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

---
Formal Recommendation 

From: National Organic Standards Board (NOSB)

To: the National Organic Program (NOP)

Date: April 30, 2021

Subject: NOSB Resolution on Organic Livestock and Poultry Practices (OLPP) 

NOSB Chair: Steve Ela

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Other: X

Statement of the Recommendation: 

The NOSB supports the 2017 recommendation and the immediate implementation of the Organic 

Livestock and Poultry Practices rule.

NOSB Vote: 

Motion to accept the resolution on Organic Livestock and Poultry Practices (OLPP) 

Motion by: Nate Powell-Palm

Seconded by: Rick Greenwood

Yes: 13 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 1 Recuse: 0

 

Motion Passed
Proposed resolution for 2021 NOSB Spring Meeting:

On April 21st, 2017 the National Organic Standards Board unanimously voted to pass a resolution 

requesting the implementation of the Organic Livestock and Poultry Practices rule. 

The National Organic Standards Board recognizes that consumers’ trust of the organic label and industry 

growth depends on the strength and consistent application of the organic regulations. NOSB has an 

integral role in advising USDA in its promulgation of these voluntary standards and strives to seek 

consensus among organic stakeholders in its recommendations to USDA and the secretary. The Organic 

Livestock and Poultry Practices rule, finalized in 2017 and subsequently withdrawn in 2018, was based 

on a unanimous NOSB recommendation to USDA in 2011. The NOSB recommendation was the product 

of a decade of public NOSB meetings, lengthy discussions, public comment periods and consultation 

from organic producers, processors, consumers, and the veterinary and scientific community. Both the 

NOSB recommendation and the final rule issued by Secretary Vilsack in 2017 defined appropriate 

requirements for space, density and outdoor access in organic poultry production. Support for this rule 

has been expressed through public comment by major and growing organic brands. The rule is 

supported by organic producers, consumers, the industry, and the NOSB. The policy received over 

120,000 supportive comments in the federal register representing over 99% of commenters. The NOSB 

stands by its 2011 recommendation to USDA on the organic livestock and poultry practices policy 

questions.

Therefore, be it resolved by unanimous vote, the National Organic Standards Board—as USDA’s 

Federal Advisory Board on organic issues and representing organic farmers, ranchers, processors, 

retailers and consumers—urges the Secretary to re-issue as final the Organic Livestock and Poultry 

Practices rule with policy considerations related to outdoor access and space requirements as 

established in 2017 without further delay.

Though 4 years have passed since 2017, the board, and the organic community, remain unified in our 

call for the implementation of OLPP. Today we vote again, as a unified board, and ask for the immediate 

implementation of the Organic Livestock and Poultry Practices rule.
Exhibit
23.2





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-20169) pertaining to the Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. 1993 Stock Option
Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-29940) pertaining to the
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan, and the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-130832) of Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. pertaining to the Cal-Maine
Foods, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan and to the Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. Stock
Appreciation Rights Plan of our report dated August 10, 2009, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and
Subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended May
30, 2009.





/s/
      FROST, PLLCCertified
      Public Accountants





Little
Rock, Arkansas


August 2,
2010
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equus II Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2005 (the Report), I, Harry O. Nicodemus IV, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                             
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    HARRY O. NICODEMUS
IV
|                         |  |  |  | Harry O. Nicodemus IV       
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer