alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    443588000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        26771000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       4475000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                37556000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               512390000
<COMMON>                                      44941000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          109285000
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               154226000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    3475000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         142153000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             7500000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               205036000
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                512390000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    182764000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                          12150000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   140247000
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   152397000
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       30367000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              607000
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                30974000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      11907000
<NET-INCOME>                                  19067000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     153000
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                 18914000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      13071000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                     11663000
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        33192000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Raj Das, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of *info*USA Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 9, 2004    */s/ Raj Das*  Raj Das Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31



Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd.



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



I, Randy L. Denecky, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. (the registrant);



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

(intentionally omitted pursuant to the guidance contained in SEC Release No. 33  8238)



(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 24, 2004



/s/ Randy L. Denecky

Randy L. Denecky

Acting President and Chief Financial and

Accounting Officer
#### Israel Discount Bank of New York, Respondent, v 500 Fifth Avenue Associates, Defendant, Israel Green, Respondent, and Jerry Williams et al., Appellants.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered January 8, 1991, which awarded plaintiff 4 million dollars plus interest at the contract rate of 15% through the date of this judgment, unanimously modified on the law to the extent of providing for 9% statutory interest from March 22, *4921990, to the date of entry of this judgment, and the order is otherwise affirmed, with costs.

Codefendants Green, Williams and Brown executed separate guarantees of 500 Fifth Avenue Associates’ December 1, 1988, 5 million dollar promissory note in favor of plaintiff. Plaintiff obtained summary judgment in lieu of complaint against the primary obligor and the three guarantors. Pending defendants Williams’ and Brown’s prior appeal to this Court, it was stipulated plaintiff would not enter judgment against them in return for creation of a $4,750,000 escrow account. Plaintiff proceeded to enter judgment against the other defendants, the primary obligor-limited partnership and co-guarantor Green, on March 22, 1990. This Court affirmed the grant of summary judgment to plaintiff against defendants Williams and Brown (167 AD2d 203). Thereupon, plaintiff was paid $4,797,698.78 from the escrow fund. In settling the judgment against defendants Williams and Brown, the court proceeded to calculate interest at the 15% contract rate through the date of this judgment.

Interest chargeable against defendants Williams and Brown from March 22, 1990 on should have been calculated at the 9% statutory rate, as on that date, the note merged into plaintiff’s judgment against the primary obligor *(see, Bank Leumi Trust Co. v Ross Mgt.,*101 AD2d 759). Defendants Williams and Brown, by the terms of their guarantees, did not assume any greater obligation with respect to interest than did the primary obligor *(see, American Trading Co. v Fish,*42 NY2d 20). Any ambiguity in this regard is to be construed strictly in favor of the guarantors against plaintiff *(Key Bank v Burns,*162 AD2d 501). Finally, in the circumstances of this case, we see no abuse of discretion in the court’s refusal to provide an affirmative provision directing that plaintiff assign its rights under the March 22, 1990 judgment against Green to defendants Williams and Brown upon their payment of this judgment *(see,*63 NY Jur 2d, Guaranty and Suretyship, § 457). The issue of Green’s liability to defendants Williams and Brown may be determined in further proceedings between those parties, if necessary. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



The undersigned officers of AutoImmune Inc. (the Company) hereby certify that, as of the date of this statement, the Companys quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act) and that, to the best of
their knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2005 and the results of operations of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30,
2005.



The purpose of this certification is solely to comply
with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This statement is not filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Act or any other federal or state law or regulation.



|                      |  |                          |  |                                  
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2005 |  | /s/ Robert C. Bishop    
|                      |  | Name:                    |  | Robert C. Bishop                 
|                      |  | Title:                   |  | Chief Executive Officer          
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Heather A. Ellerkamp
|                      |  | Name:                    |  | Heather A. Ellerkamp             
|                      |  | Title:                   |  | Director of Finance and Treasurer
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42183

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JOSEPH DRAYTON COOK,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 472

Filed: April 17, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Latah County. Hon. John R. Stegner, District Judge. 

Order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM 

Joseph Drayton Cook was convicted of possession of methamphetamine, Idaho Code 

§ 37-2732(c)(1). The district court withheld judgment and placed Cook in Mental Health Court. 

Cook violated the terms of the program and the district court imposed a unified four-year 

sentence with a one-year determinate term but retained jurisdiction. The district court 

subsequently relinquished jurisdiction and ordered execution of Cook’s sentence. Cook appeals 

the district court’s decision to relinquish jurisdiction.

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to 

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district 
2

court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood, 102 

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee, 117 Idaho 203, 205-06, 786 P.2d 594, 596-

97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the 

information before it and reasonably determined that probation was not appropriate. We hold 

that Cook has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing 

jurisdiction.

The order relinquishing jurisdiction is affirmed.
Ife; ?* V'*^"****- '£"''"" ^ ORIGINAL

**^ firr^iM* fuz*"*"- t*fc- 1$ w«{ vrnfammiappeals

S*proof '• APR 072015

YW flf /luM^dx. Abel Acosta, Clerk ,

' P«W /•? *?"* Af /c^ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR If$015

Lr«^J ./LtWe«r /i/u*rl>*r 0*c Abel Acosta, Clerk

^ w/ <^w ol'ftf/rv1 *n^ +*** '-J& Ctnf

die? M /W \ut^J/ci/^ of- jflpf***- °J f'/%'fr'i1

p/QZeflU

tf

I 0a ^*aiaM£ ~l(-%0tY X^<- X<~*( <5*V^<-' -l/r^fes] XL fefflwr /W ^c flipfitter A"^"^^ 'y XL Coui<t &Ww"r wiU k^oe/f XL '"/fa **»''«

P\aA fiAA/ffHPc 7i£„ XL f* •/*+?">
utl J*l/"Afy oX X7. r«*< /V ^V ?„f*l ^°XU ^ /V h '« w^^/

XL Csu(A XL} Ad- Lvi/i ';*££*>+- ^ J/**'' 4*Q* 01*4 XA PM/tcf /)fftrA<s- 'Ifact ••••X4_ /^ 4>*t$,H /W fL ir/c( S^^ u,Mjfci» V^:••••/?** J /*•****J

^W cLri/ S7*\ Acttfj- X*^ /?/** f^T^-^J .&.**&'*>

A-P+t X?c XoWJ Su*£i<- U/X^re,^ XL />/*<

f*r<ec^ 4L X**i.. "Sx^rc. /tv XL s^X^^

Z 0* 'S****!^- (3-2.01' X?^ X'*{ 'T^^* M^Ssr X?<t

2S X U±- a*' J* #** fo**xt<» XL- y,

pfdcetLie- i'Cf-

<L

fef/f/SXer

0ir<*< ^<;j/ifo:s<j*+ -far +'<- r"''!*'*-

&/?<•< v

•ft*TM, '/>»»*<- &,/*. /z*2/ 2< +e •••*/'-/<>' /, +e_ 4* /

<U^ £W o£ 6,;*•**< */ir»[ ?1>K £t»*r •

•Yi;. firm/ AevU-s j/»»J.r -f^o

Wj^ca^

l'JL(
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 3

THE UNION'S ADVISORY BODIES

SECTION 2

SECTION 2

THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Article 305

(ex Article 263, second, third and fourth paragraphs, TEC)

(ex Article 263, second, third and fourth paragraphs, TEC)

The number of members of the Committee of the Regions shall not exceed 350.

The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt a decision determining the Committee's composition.

The members of the Committee and an equal number of alternate members shall be appointed for five years. Their term of office shall be renewable. The Council shall adopt the list of members and alternate members drawn up in accordance with the proposals made by each Member State. When the mandate referred to in Article 300(3) on the basis of which they were proposed comes to an end, the term of office of members of the Committee shall terminate automatically and they shall then be replaced for the remainder of the said term of office in accordance with the same procedure. No member of the Committee shall at the same time be a Member of the European Parliament.

---
EXHIBIT 23.2

                                                                   ------------


                       WILLIAM M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
                        Worldwide Petroleum Consultants

12770 Coit Road, Suite 907                                       (972) 385-0354
Dallas, Texas                                               Fax: (972) 788-5165
                                                      E-Mail: office@wmcobb.com


                                 March 29, 2007


Nexen Inc.
801 7th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P7
Canada

Attention:    Reserves Review Committee of the
              Board of Directors of Nexen Inc.

Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to references to our firm relating to the  evaluation  and/or
audit of certain oil and gas properties of Nexen Inc. (the "Company") contained
in the  section  entitled  "Basis  of  Reserves  Estimates"  within  "Reserves,
Production and Related  Information" as set out in Part I, Items 1 & 2 Business
and  Properties of the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K/A  Amendment No. 1
for the year ended December 31, 2005.


                                        Sincerely,
                                        WILLIAM M. COBB & ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                        /s/ Frank J. Marek, P.E.
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Frank J. Marek, P.E.
                                        Senior Vice President



FJM:jf
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000009803-MAY-201210:14 AM
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


               KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned
directors and officers of BRUSH WELLMAN INC., an Ohio corporation (the
"Corporation"), hereby constitutes and appoints Gordon D. Harnett, Michael C.
Hasychak, Leigh B. Trevor and Louis Rorimer, and each of them, their true and
lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and
revocation, for them and in their names, place and stead, to sign on their
behalf as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of the
Corporation, an Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998,
and to sign any and all amendments to such Annual Report, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission granting unto said attorney or
attorneys-in-fact, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or
attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands
as of the 2nd day of March, 1999.


/s/ Gordon D. Harnett                          /s/ Joseph P. Keithley
--------------------------------------         ----------------------------
Gordon D. Harnett, Chairman, President,        Joseph P. Keithley, Director
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


/s/ Albert C. Bersticker                       /s/ William P. Madar
------------------------------                 --------------------------
Albert C. Bersticker, Director                 William P. Madar, Director


/s/ Charles F. Brush, III                      /s/ Robert M. McInnes
-------------------------------                ---------------------------
Charles F. Brush, III, Director                Robert M. McInnes, Director


/s/ David L. Burner                            /s/ William R. Robertson
-------------------------                      ------------------------------
David L. Burner, Director                      William R. Robertson, Director


/s/ David H. Hoag                              /s/ John Sherwin, Jr.
-----------------------                        ---------------------------
David H. Hoag, Director                        John Sherwin, Jr., Director


/s/ John D. Grampa
--------------------------------------
John D. Grampa, Vice President Finance
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Rule:

State Wyoming

State Agency Department of Environmental Quality

Affected Area EPA-approved source specific requirements

Regulation Black Hills Power and Light

Rule Number .

Rule Title Order containing schedule for compliance, interim requirements, and 

monitoring and reporting requirements.

State Effective Date 04/25/1979

State Adoption Date

EPA Effective Date 08/01/1979

Notice of Final Rule Date 07/02/1979

Notice of Final Rule Citation 44 FR 38473

Comments

(d) Black Hills PandL (4-25-1979).pdf

52.2620(d), EPA-approved source specific requirements. Part 1 of 1, Page 1
52.2620(d), EPA-approved source specific requirements. Part 1 of 1, Page 2
52.2620(d), EPA-approved source specific requirements. Part 1 of 1, Page 3
Rule:

State Wyoming

State Agency Department of Environmental Quality

Affected Area EPA-approved source specific requirements

Regulation FMC Corporation

Rule Number .

Rule Title Order containing schedule for compliance, interim requirements, and 

monitoring and reporting requirements.

State Effective Date 04/25/1979

State Adoption Date

EPA Effective Date 08/01/1979

Notice of Final Rule Date 07/02/1979

Notice of Final Rule Citation 44 FR 38473

Comments

(d) FMC Corp (4-25-1979).pdf

52.2620(d), EPA-approved source specific requirements. Part 1 of 1, Page 4
52.2620(d), EPA-approved source specific requirements. Part 1 of 1, Page 5
52.2620(d), EPA-approved source specific requirements. Part 1 of 1, Page 6
52.2620(d), EPA-approved source specific requirements. Part 1 of 1, Page 7