alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 03-14-00676-CR

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE

THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

ANGELITA RODRIGUEZ PACHECO,

Appellant

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 424th Judicial District Court

Cause No. 41988

Burnet County, Texas

The Honorable Dan Mills, Judge Presiding

APPELLANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Gary E. Prust

State Bar No. 24056166

1607 Nueces Street

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 469-0092

Fax: (512) 469-9102

gary@prustlaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED

ACCEPTED

03-14-00676-CR

4954555

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/20/2015 2:30:06 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/20/2015 2:30:06 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
APPELLANT’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE BRIEF

Appellant, Angelita Rodriguez Pacheco, file this, her “Second Motion for 

Extension of Time to File Brief,” and in support thereof shows as follows.

I.

1. Appellant's Motion is brought pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P 10.5(b).

2. Appellant has once requested previously an extension of time within which to file 

her brief.

3. Appellant's brief is due on April 20, 2015. 

4. Appellant's attorney had a very busy trial and appellate schedule during the 

months of March and April 2015. Appellant’s attorney authored and filed two briefs in 

two unrelated appellate causes in the month of April 2015, and he has had numerous trial 

settings and evidentiary hearings. 

5. In order to address the issues raised in the present appeal thoroughly, Appellant's 

attorney will require more time to complete his brief. Appellant’s attorney will require 

until June 19, 2015 to complete his brief.

6. Accordingly, Appellants request that this Court allow him until June 19, 2015 to 

file his brief.
Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Gary E. Prust

Gary E. Prust

SBN 24056166

1607 Nueces Street

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 469-0092

Fax: (512) 469-9102

gary@prustlaw.com

Attorney for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

In compliance with Rule 9.5(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the 

undersigned attorney certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion was 

served upon Mr. R. Blake Ewing with the 33rd and 424th Judicial District Attorney’s 

Office via electronic transmission to his email address at asstda2@burnetcountytexas.org

in accordance Rule 9.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on this the 18th day 

of February, 2015.

/s/ Gary E. Prust

Gary E. Prust

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. PROC. 9.4(i)(3), I hereby certify this motion

contains 167 words. This is a computer-generated document created in Microsoft 

Word, using 14-point typeface. In making this this certificate, I rely on the word 

count provided by the software use to prepare the document.

/s/ Gary E Prust

Gary E. Prust
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

22.   Declaration on Articles 48 and 79 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Articles 48 and 79 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference considers that in the event that a draft legislative act based on Article 79(2) would affect important aspects of the social security system of a Member State, including its scope, cost or financial structure, or would affect the financial balance of that system as set out in the second paragraph of Article 48, the interests of that Member State will be duly taken into account.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Marvin F. Romanow, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Nexen Inc., a Canadian Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
     31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
     hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
     and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:    March 1, 2005                              /s/ Marvin F. Romanow
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    Marvin F. Romanow
                                                    Executive Vice President,
                                                    and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Name of Licensee,License Number,EIN (if Applicable),License Issue Date,License Expiration Date,Email,Phone,License Status,On Corrective Action Plan?,Street,City,State,Zip Code
EXHIBIT 31.1
IEA Income Fund XII, L.P.
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income FundXII, L.P. (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on ourevaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: August 12, 2004
/s/ DENNIS J TIETZDennis J Tietz
# New Mexico_county_differentials
# C_2016202EN.01034701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/347 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/347

---

29.   Declaration on Article 107(2)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 107(2)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference notes that Article 107(2)(c) shall be interpreted in accordance with the existing case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding the applicability of the provisions to aid granted to certain areas of the Federal Republic of Germany affected by the former division of Germany.

---
Agricultural Marketing Service, Specialty Crops Program, Specialty Crops Inspection Division 

Inspection or Audit Services Rendered to Specialty Crops Inspection Division 

FEDERAL MARKET 

RECEIVING SERVICE 

MONTH AND YEAR OF 

SERVICE(S) 

NAME OF INSPECTOR AND DATE(S) OF SERVICE 

SALARY 

FOR HOURS 

WORKED 

($) 

BENEFITS 

FOR HOURS 

WORKED 

($) 

TOTAL 

SALARY AND 

BENEFITS 

($) 

EXPENSES 

INCURRED 

($) 

TOTAL 

CHARGE FOR 

SERVICE(S) 

($) 

GRAND TOTAL FOR SERVICE(S) 

REMARKS: Instructions: Prepare form in accordance with 

instructions in Federal and Federal-State 

Supervisors Manual. Remit the completed form 

with corresponding SF-270 to the Federal Program 

Managers and: 

Email: FPBStatePartners@ams.usda.gov 

or Mail to: 

USDA AMS SCP SCI Division 

Federal-State Accounts 

1400 Independence Avenue, SW. 

Room 1536-S, Stop 0240

Washington, D.C. 20250-0240

NAME AND ADDRESS OF STATE AGENCY PROVIDING SERVICE(S): 

FEDERAL SUPERVISOR (SIGNATURE) DATE 

SC-214 (2-17) Destroy previous editions. Reproduce locally
# C_2016202EN.01040501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/405 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/405

---

Article 54

Prohibition of abuse of rights

Nothing in this Charter shall be interpreted as implying any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognised in this Charter or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for herein.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE II

FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

CHAPTER 3

PROHIBITION OF QUANTITATIVE RESTRICTIONS BETWEEN MEMBER STATES

Article 35

(ex Article 29 TEC)

(ex Article 29 TEC)

Quantitative restrictions on exports, and all measures having equivalent effect, shall be prohibited between Member States.

---
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

222 

KA 05-02229 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAVONNE L. SCOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

MULDOON & GETZ, ROCHESTER (MARTIN P. MCCARTHY, II, OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LESLIE E. SWIFT OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County

(Joseph D. Valentino, J.), rendered June 14, 2005. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of manslaughter in the first

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, following

a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20

[1]), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in denying his

Batson challenge. Defendant failed to object to the court’s procedure

for determining his Batson challenge and thus defendant failed to

preserve his contention for our review (see People v Parker, 304 AD2d

146, 156, lv denied 100 NY2d 585). Defendant also failed to preserve

for our review his contention that the court erred in denying his

motion for a mistrial based on juror misconduct. Although defendant

contends that the court failed to make a sufficient inquiry of the

other jurors with respect to the misconduct of the juror in question,

he failed to raise that issue in support of the motion (see generally

People v Torres, 80 NY2d 944, rearg denied 81 NY2d 784). We decline

to exercise our power to review those contentions as a matter of

discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). 

Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: February 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
# C_2016202EN.01003301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/33

---

Article 29

(ex Article 15 TEU)

(ex Article 15 TEU)

The Council shall adopt decisions which shall define the approach of the Union to a particular matter of a geographical or thematic nature. Member States shall ensure that their national policies conform to the Union positions.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1552 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1552

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to furnish headstones or markers to private cemeteries 
          for graves of certain veterans without next of kin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2019

  Mr. Tipton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to furnish headstones or markers to private cemeteries 
          for graves of certain veterans without next of kin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Private Cemeteries Honoring Veterans 
in the Absence of Next of Kin Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUESTS BY PRIVATE CEMETERIES FOR HEADSTONES OR MARKERS FOR 
              GRAVES OF CERTAIN VETERANS.

    Section 2306(d) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(6) If the Secretary is unable to identify any next of kin of a 
deceased individual covered by this subsection, a private cemetery may 
request the Secretary to furnish--
            ``(A) a headstone or marker for the grave of the deceased 
        individual pursuant to paragraph (1); or
            ``(B) a medallion or other device to signify the deceased 
        individual's status as a veteran pursuant to paragraph (4).''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF S.T.S, 

a Child.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00138-CV

Appeal from the

388th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2016DCM5159)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellants all costs of appeal for which let execution issue. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023.

SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Chief Justice (Ret.)

Before Palafox, J., Soto, J., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.) (Sitting by Assignment)
<Page>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.3

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                             COASTAL CAPITAL TRUST I

     THIS Certificate of Trust of Coastal Capital Trust I (the "Trust"), dated
as of April 29, 2002, is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by
the undersigned, as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware
Business Trust Act, 12 DEL. C.Sections 3801 ET SEQ. (the "Act").

     1.   NAME. The name of the business trust formed by this Certificate of
Trust is "Coastal Capital Trust I".

     2.   DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust in the State of Delaware are The Bank of New York (Delaware), 700 White
Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.

     3.   EFFECTIVE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate of
Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.

                 THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE),
                  Not in its individual capacity, but solely as Delaware Trustee

                 By:  /s/ James Longshaw
                      -----------------------------------
                      Name:  James Longshaw
                      Title:    Senior Vice President

                 MANUEL J. MEHOS, not in his individual
                 capacity, but solely as administrative trustee

                 /s/ Manuel J. Mehos
                 ----------------------------------------

                 CATHERINE N. WYLIE, not in her individual
                 capacity, but solely as administrative trustee

                 /s/ Catherine N. Wylie
                 ----------------------------------------

                 LINDA B. FRAZIER, not in her individual
                 capacity, but solely as administrative trustee

                 /s/ Linda B. Frazier
                 ----------------------------------------
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

12.   Declaration on Article 18 of the Treaty on European Union

Declaration on Article 18 of the Treaty on European Union

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

American HomePatient, Inc.
Brentwood, Tennessee

Re:   Registration Statements No. 333-56313, No. 333-56317, No. 333-125013, and
      No. 333-125015

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 1, 2005 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is
not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                             /s/ KPMG, LLP


November 1, 2005
Nashville, Tennessee
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Raj Das, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of *info*USA Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 10, 2005         */s/ Raj Das*   Raj Das   Chief Financial Officer  
26