alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

April 15, 2015

Hon. Gaines F. West II

West, Webb, Allbritton & Gentry, P.C.

1515 Emerald Plaza

College Station, TX 77845-1515

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Thomas F. Nye

Gault Nye & Quintana

Attorneys at Law

717 Everhart, Suite A

Corpus Christi, TX 78411

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00696-CV

Tr.Ct.No. 2014-DCL-00910-I

Style: Columbia Valley Healthcare System L.P. d/b/a Valley Regional Medical 

Center v. Maria Zamarripa, as Guardian of the Estates of Rey Francisco 

Ramirez and Rammy Justin Ramirez, Minors

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file reply brief was this day GRANTED 

by this Court. The time has been extended to Thursday, May 14, 2015.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,025,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              114,972,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                22,324,000
<INVENTORY>                                 25,167,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           130,643,000
<PP&E>                                     106,967,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              43,696,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             439,644,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,851,000
<BONDS>                                    192,156,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       148,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 221,951,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               439,644,000
<SALES>                                     39,033,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            84,586,000
<CGS>                                       19,004,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,004,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            55,046,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,486,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,908,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,628,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,990,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,638,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,638,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 899 

To require the country of origin of certain special immigrant religious workers 

to extend reciprocal immigration treatment to nationals of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2015 

Mr. KING of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the country of origin of certain special immigrant 

religious workers to extend reciprocal immigration treatment to nationals of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Religious Worker Visa 

5 Reciprocity Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIRING RECIPROCAL IMMIGRATION TREAT7 MENT. 

8 Section 204(a)(1)(G) of the Immigration and Nation9 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(G)) is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 899 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) Beginning on October 1, 2015, no petition may 

2 be approved for classification of an alien as a special immi3 grant under section 101(a)(27)(C) if the Secretary of 

4 Homeland Security has determined that the country of the 

5 alien’s nationality— 

6 ‘‘(I) is identified as a ‘Country of Particular 

7 Concern’ or a country where religious freedom is of 

8 significant interest in the 2013 International Reli9 gious Freedom Report; or 

10 ‘‘(II) does not extend reciprocal immigration 

11 treatment to nationals of the United States who are 

12 seeking resident status in order to work in a reli13 gious vocation or occupation.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2016202EN.01039501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/395 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/395

---

Article 7

Respect for private and family life

Everyone has the right to respect for his or her private and family life, home and communications.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6482

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARINO RAMIREZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-90, CA-97-556-2) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles E. Haden, Hampton, Virginia, for Appellant. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ramirez , Nos. CR-93-90; CA-97-556-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-13-0248/p130248.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:20:58 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0248

Focus Ready Draft 2/25/2013

ENGINEER: Jon \ JAS

SUBMITTER: 

 
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-13-0248/p130248.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:20:58 PM]

SAT (concerns) (02/12/2013):

Migration to groundwater: Rapid

PBT rating: P3B1T2 .

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: Water (All releases to water with a CC = 710 ppb.)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-13-0248/p130248.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:20:58 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0248

Processing: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 1

NOVOLYTE Technologies, Inc. Zachary LA 70791-8514

Days/yr: 200

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Water or Air or Incineration or Landfill

Output 2: 2.5E+0 kg/site-day over 200 days/yr from 1 site

or 5.0E+2 kg/yr

Incineration

Conservative: 1.0E+1 kg/site-day over 200 days/yr from 1

site

or 2.0E+3 kg/yr
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-13-0248/p130248.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:20:58 PM]

Incineration

Output 2: 5.0E+0 kg/site-day over 200 days/yr from 1 site

or 1.0E+3 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL

3.5E+3 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

 

 

 

 
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-13-0248/p130248.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:20:58 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0248

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 445

unknown site(s)

Days/yr: 250

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Water or Incineration or Landfill

High End: 1.9E-1 kg/site-day over 36 days/yr from 445

sites

or 3.0E+3 kg/yr

Water or Incineration or Landfill

Conservative: 9.0E-3 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 445

sites

or 1.0E+3 kg/yr
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-13-0248/p130248.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:20:58 PM]

RELEASE TOTAL

4.0E+3 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a                               ( print page 82438)                            domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 24, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 17, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 16 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-58, CP2024-59.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-25894 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AS OF AUGUST 1, 1998 AND THE  RELATED  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWENTY-SIX  WEEKS ENDED ON AUGUST 1, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.



</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000879123
<NAME>                        Goody's Family Clothing, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            Jan-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>               Feb-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                 Aug-01-1998
<CASH>                            41,872
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                      201,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 266,345
<PP&E>                           158,333
<DEPRECIATION>                    57,887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   369,828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            171,024
<BONDS>                              608
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                          28,034
<OTHER-SE>                       156,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     369,828
<SALES>                          476,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 476,203
<CGS>                            337,139
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    113,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   26,345
<INCOME-TAX>                       9,919
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               16,426
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                      16,426
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.47
        


</TABLE>
[Cite as Black v. McKinley Twp., 2017-Ohio-7390.]

COURT OF APPEALS 

STARK COUNTY, OHIO 

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

LAWRENCE BLACK 

 Petitioner 

-vsTOWNSHIP OF MCKINLEY, 

CITY OF CANTON 

 Respondents 

JUDGES: 

Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. 

Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. 

Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., J. 

Case No. 2017CA00133 

O P I N I O N 

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Prohibition 

JUDGMENT: Dismissed 

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: August 28, 2017 

APPEARANCES: 

For Petitioner For Respondents 

LAWRENCE BLACK, PRO SE NO APPEARANCE 

1511 Maple Ave N.E. 

Canton, Ohio 44705 
Stark County, Case No. 2017CA00133 2

Hoffman, J. 

{¶1} Petitioner, Lawrence Black, has filed a “Notice.” The pleading is not in a 

complaint or petition format. The notice does not contain any requested relief. The notice 

reads in its entirety, “Notice to this Court of Appeals of Lawrence Black’s Peremptory Writ 

of Prohibition. Judge Mary Falvey is forcing proceeding on Lawrence Black which was 

filed first by Darla S. Hinderer, and letter was to Judge Falvey 12 Jul 17. Darla S. Hinderer 

writting (sic) dismissed charges, Judge Falvey is attempting to try and convict.” (Citations 

omitted). Attached to the notice is what appears to be a proposed order for a peremptory 

writ of prohibition. 

{¶2} In order for a writ of prohibition to issue, petitioner must prove that: (1) the 

lower court is about to exercise judicial authority; (2) the exercise of authority is not 

authorized by law; and, (3) the petitioner has no other adequate remedy in the ordinary 

course of law if a writ of prohibition is denied. State ex rel. Keenan v. Calabrese (1994), 

69 Ohio St.3d 176, 178, 631 N.E.2d 119. A writ of prohibition, regarding the unauthorized 

exercise of judicial power, will only be granted where the judicial officer's lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction is patent and unambiguous. Ohio Dept. of Adm. Serv., Office of 

Collective Bargaining v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1990), 54 Ohio St.3d 48, 562 N.E.2d 

125. 

{¶3} The named Respondents in this case are the Township of McKinley and 

City of Canton. A writ of prohibition is used to limit judicial authority. The township and 

city do not have judicial authority, therefore, prohibition cannot lie to prevent the township 

or city from acting. 
Stark County, Case No. 2017CA00133 3

{¶4} Because prohibition does not lie against the named Respondents, the 

cause is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

By: Hoffman, J. 

Delaney, P.J. and 

Wise, Earle, J. concur
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Salvatore D’Auria, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/AAmendment No.2 of Tut Systems, Inc.;

 

2.                                       Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:  September 2, 2004 |     |     |                                                                                          |
|--------------------------|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| * *                 | * * | * * | * *                                                                                      |
| * *                 | *By:*    | * * | * /s/  Salvatore D’Auria*                                                           |
| * *                 | * * | * * | *Salvatore D’Auria,*                                                                     |
| * *                 | * * | * * | *President, Chief Executive Officer and  Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)* |

* *
Via email and fax 

Dana.Coale@usda.gov

202-690-3410 

Ms. Dana Coale April 27, 2020 

Deputy Administrator 

USDA 

Dear Ms. Coale, 

In the wake of an unprecedented decrease in dairy commodity prices due to the COVID19 crisis, 

Upper Midwest Marketing Agency, on behalf of some of its members, request that the USDA set 

a minimum Class I Price Mover for all Federal Milk Orders at $15.68 per cwt. in an effort to 

help maintain milk prices necessary to save our dairy farmers. A $15.68 per cwt. Class I mover 

represents the average of the mover for March, April and May. We ask that the USDA make this 

change expeditiously and consider these needed changes as an emergency provision needed to 

maintain orderly marketing and to assure that an adequate supply of milk remains available. 

The Class I Price Mover is based on a combination of Class III and Class IV prices, plus $.74.

The Class III and Class IV prices are calculated by using the surveyed commodity prices for

butter, cheese, skim milk powder, and whey. When this system was established, no one thought 

we would ever be in a situation where all commodity prices would collapse at the same time to

the levels we are seeing today. Due to this unprecedented collapse of commodity prices, we 

believe the Market Administrators must set a minimum level for the Class I Price Mover. 

We believe the Federal Order system has “emergency action” leeway that would allow for Market 

Administrators to take dramatic actions to assure the objectives of the Federal Order system are 

met. The COVID19 crisis certainly constitutes an “emergency” causing us to consider the 

actions proposed above. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Vince Martens, President 

Vince.Martens@ForemostFarms.com 

On behalf of the following UMMA members: Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., First District 

Association, Foremost Farms USA, Coop., Land O’Lakes, Inc., National Farmers Organization, 

Plainview Milk Products 

Cc: Vic Halverson, Market Administrator, FMMO30
OOull{ tOY A~~e~Ls ~ 3eJel'Jn1 D\~i!llCi Ot ~ Hof'OOI.U\<2:>1~ . V\ V\f.l N leN<; ~ lUeo}l 1 

P. lD \ /101-. q 5 '-10 

{.).mtJ (L,LlD .l f&2> 1 t:tlo.~ ,~s 10 

Cl.E: I' two 0 > L~Gili ~ dr...,-v - e, nt.bolbf e' \j)) .!lr.Jl) ff /A L eASt 1\X) it U/-ts -oo 

t. t l - c_ V- i rtlf\lL &lJn\ NO~ q1<D(o 1·-e... · 

D~(l fl"'\SS Wr-J G) 

FI'EAs<: hND .r:. '\we:. 191\iC:J\NAL CoF-J P-~s\ l£\'n:.Q.. {o C'tlWlr Nf:': 

wooob.-lflN. eJ~~Ut f.!Jttosro for~ ~luJ0 IN 1)-(.t::A&J\J(;" EMf\<nco IVf:lMf.-D 

~tJ\IJ (;()Pf\dN£0 AKiN1 ~f..tL , 

pLEA~\£ h le:. 1\\e: ~~IS!:::' ~ f:t.fo &tWb '\b ~ &:r-ltts A ~1\11\ o IV ~< 'iDurt EJ.)n.\ u: .. \'1 Ct)r\1\hJte..l.J oc~ 

·'f\1,(vJ)( 'lou (t),l "lOJh ffi1n~6\\ 1tJ ~ ·Mnf'\5tt- · 

i1 
t4DtJO ~ PJL€ f D [L rE ~ C1;1 !WI l\\lf WOOD ~\l W 

0

" ., 

{()\) ~R\ c\ G\'2-t\'. , APR c.u tilh 

r • 0 ) ~0~ 0.t 5 10 SEVENTh COt!~!. Ole APPEALS 

lo I(\.;;) " 1 (J 1 0 s a ·s1D VIVIAN LONt:i, CLERK Rrvv~ t\ L 1 \ uN~S y' ~ 1 . 

APR\\ \~. WlS 

eoPV 

~t. ·, At:.lklesf .(1) ~ \Y\~ &ouni &ePOtt\t.l\) (~£COJL{)ffi t\:;A(t\1\]b He..~ \- t5 -\ S 

I~ '\\-\~ 10 ~ 111 ()1) \tvu' Cilllll ~i Jlt6 t:.' WOO!> &wJ S '\\\ Lt£> LutS. S lAb<tlt ffi" J; 

-v- C:n'BGon'-t c, l;)uLOk.la ~'(-- AL :1!AJ ·'M~ ~S-\5f 'JlJ\Qtc:f CcJ..AAf r~e: w. 91ohJ-c_. 

(J£AQ... \'t\\·::>~ WUO.D &An.tJ . 

Pl~~i flt'- .<l D v't> e.o 1m< H'\~ of ow ce '\'r'\6 i _, s ~ Is \-\eAR1 rJ 0 1\'lA 1 

UJA5 \4~l1J 11\J me_ ~r:J;V£ e~us·e,n !00\-\ IQAJ~ ~:JJIH\~.£) .1\Jfi)f\t\£. '{O~ N 0 f<. 

DIE OOJQ ( llEPort 11 Jl.- o f Cfun f Recon.() €-tu HAS NOI roQ W.t.llb .M {;; A Co{' 1 

&Y ~ HeliltwJG MD otJ H 6-ls Pun.svt~N\ iO 12L\Lt I~. 1 , ArJ o Ruttr 

3 s. 3 ( R) 0) 2 ( \')) elV\ L flul~ of ~ fPt:.)]()fe: PJ<.oceou Re:s'* L{ \ s A 

~Otnffi ·iYb{ 1M£ D\){t1H:l Q,\ef\-\C... C!JJO ·iY\~i tov\l)f !Leful\f6fL fo~tw~fl\0 s A· 

~~--l OY \HE lie~filf\JG {O APPe\\.(hJ\1 So 11e. N)()i P~nJ~c( 4-ils APPeAL~ All Pl1lfl N~ t'AlN N D1 Pe.~t fe c:( 1-\15 AP P E 11 L w' !1-1 o t.~f A co f 'I of '\}It: 1-l e: A e ,AJc; , 

'lru rt Wo ~ Eri.M)or-1 1 N w \)\IS IWl ffi':IL 1 .:, Gnu.fuH MP R tCAA 1e. tJ, 

t:\ M~~ of '\tlls lm&, lS fDOWI\IL(')e:J:\ m '{\{~ ~MI<£ \Jhlt(ll\) loN' t1€1Lil-li)~~, -~ 1111 C\)S'(Q\Lf ®~\ Ot APPI::ll LS.., •; 

31()Cl".l\tl i ~ 
(' Lfii:G:,f,1iffE :JR,>#-Itc ~ sc g 

i rLt) u~, ~ NCJ:RTY! ·HOtJ'STfJf~;J ·:,r;;:.;- 775' ·''··· 

M ~Lt1 

~v' 

ULJi't~ 113ao 

E(;R L 

.:£~~ 

:./~.P\~~ .. ;~t.JJ;t:~- ;.~:!#~1 ''7:.. t. 

. C®uRr C})r A eee.Ab.s . 

~e..\f~\iti 

t \~i e, Cf Q~ ·ie.AAs . 

H0tJ~RAfJLf-

\J\ V' AJN L0MG. ~IER K 1 

P.~o, 

~ox 

~5 

LiD 

Am·A R\L.LD,I 1BAs 1 ~ t O!t>-qs~o 

"'(~.;i 

i ;:;595:!.f.t:)4::: lftil''l i'JJ '11" ,,; i Jl ifl,p 'llJl'''JPJrl,Jll' itJliJJil,r/'11'/
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 49 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 49

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  provide that Representatives shall be apportioned among the several 
 States according to their respective numbers, counting the number of 
      persons in each State who are citizens of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2019

 Mr. King of Iowa submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  provide that Representatives shall be apportioned among the several 
 States according to their respective numbers, counting the number of 
      persons in each State who are citizens of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States 
according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by 
counting the number of persons in each State who are citizens of the 
United States.''.
                                 <all>
```