alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 24, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service ® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 16, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 107 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-53, CP2024-54.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-25889 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE IV

OTHER PROVISIONS

OTHER PROVISIONS

Article 37

1.   If, until the end of a period of up to three years after accession, difficulties arise which are serious and liable to persist in any sector of the economy or which could bring about serious deterioration in the economic situation of a given area, Croatia may apply for authorisation to take protective measures in order to rectify the situation and adjust the sector concerned to the economy of the internal market.

In the same circumstances, any present Member State may apply for authorisation to take protective measures with regard to Croatia.

2.   Upon request by the State concerned, the Commission shall, by emergency procedure, determine the protective measures which it considers necessary, specifying the conditions and arrangements applicable thereto.

In the event of serious economic difficulties and at the express request of the Member State concerned, the Commission shall act within five working days of the receipt of the request accompanied by the relevant background information. The measures thus decided on shall be applicable forthwith, shall take into account the interest of all parties concerned and shall not entail border controls.

3.   The measures authorised under this Article may involve derogations from the rules of the TEU, the TFEU and this Act to such an extent and for such periods as are strictly necessary in order to attain the objectives of this safeguard. Priority shall be given to measures which least disturb the functioning of the internal market.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1291 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt student workers 

for purposes of determining a higher education institutions employer 

health care shared responsibility. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. TURNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

student workers for purposes of determining a higher 

education institutions employer health care shared responsibility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Job Protection 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1291 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDENT WORKERS EXEMPTED FROM DETERMINA2 TION OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION’S 

3 EMPLOYER HEALTH CARE SHARED RESPON4 SIBILITY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4980H(c) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating para7 graphs (5), (6), and (7) as paragraphs (6), (7), and (8), 

8 respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (4) the fol9 lowing new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(5) EXCEPTION FOR STUDENT WORKERS.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Services rendered as a 

12 student worker to an eligible educational insti13 tution (as defined in section 25A(f)(2)) shall 

14 not be taken into account under this section as 

15 service provided by an employee. 

16 ‘‘(B) STUDENT WORKER.—For purposes of 

17 this paragraph, the term ‘student worker’ 

18 means, with respect to any eligible educational 

19 institution (as so defined), any individual who— 

20 ‘‘(i) is employed by such institution, 

21 and 

22 ‘‘(ii) is a student enrolled at the insti23 tution and whose academic activity is con24 sistent with the normal full time work load 

25 as determined by the institution for the 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1291 IH

1 course of study the individual is pur2 suing.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to months beginning after Decem5 ber 31, 2013. 

6 (c) WAIVER OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON CRED7 IT OR REFUND.—If the period of limitation on a credit 

8 or refund resulting from the amendments made by sub9 section (a) expires before the end of the 1-year period be10 ginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, refund 

11 or credit of such overpayment (to the extent attributable 

12 to such amendments) may, nevertheless, be made or al13 lowed if claim therefor is filed before the close of such 

14 1-year period. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 12012M027 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M027

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE V: GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION AND SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Chapter 2: Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy - Section 1: Common provisions - Article 27 **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0032 - 0032 *

Article 27

1. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, who shall chair the Foreign Affairs Council, shall contribute through his proposals to the development of the common foreign and security policy and shall ensure implementation of the decisions adopted by the European Council and the Council.

2. The High Representative shall represent the Union for matters relating to the common foreign and security policy. He shall conduct political dialogue with third parties on the Union's behalf and shall express the Union's position in international organisations and at international conferences.

3. In fulfilling his mandate, the High Representative shall be assisted by a European External Action Service. This service shall work in cooperation with the diplomatic services of the Member States and shall comprise officials from relevant departments of the General Secretariat of the Council and of the Commission as well as staff seconded from national diplomatic services of the Member States. The organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service shall be established by a decision of the Council. The Council shall act on a proposal from the High Representative after consulting the European Parliament and after obtaining the consent of the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
# EUR-Lex - 22003D0012 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 22003D0012

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 12/2003 of 31 January 2003 amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement **

*
Official Journal L 094 , 10/04/2003 P. 0065 - 0066 *

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 12/2003

of 31 January 2003

amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex VI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 55/2002 of 31 May 2002(1).

(2) Decision of the Administrative Commission of the European Communities on Social Security for Migrant Workers No 183 of 27 June 2001 on the interpretation of Article 22(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, concerning health care in conjunction with pregnancy and childbirth(2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 3.60 (Decision No 182) of Annex VI to the Agreement:

"3.61. 32002 D 0155: Decision of the Administrative Commission of the European Communities on Social Security for Migrant Workers No 183 of 27 June 2001 on the interpretation of Article 22(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, concerning health care in conjunction with pregnancy and childbirth (OJ L 54, 25.2.2002, p. 39)."

Article 2

The texts of Decision No 183 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 February 2003, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(3).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2003.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

P. Westerlund

(1) OJ L 238, 5.9.2002, p. 16.

(2) OJ L 54, 25.2.2002, p. 39.

(3) No constitutional requirements indicated.
AMENDMENT 1 TO 

SUPPLEMENT 603 BISON 

AND BUFFALO PRODUCTS 

JUNE 2012

 APPROVED

Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)

Livestock, Poultry and Seed (LPS) Program

Food Safety and Commodity Specification (FSCS) Division

Room 2624 S-Bldg, Phone: (202) 692-0342

 Effective: February 2, 2015

Approved by CMS

Date Issued: 02/02/2015

AMENDMENT 1 TO SUPPLEMENT 603 TO AMS MASTER SOLICITATION 

PURCHASE OF FROZEN BISON AND BUFFALO PRODUCTS FOR DISTRIBUTION 

TO CHILD NUTRITION AND OTHER FEDERAL FOOD AND NUTRITION 

ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

This amendment is being issued to revise language in Supplement 603, the product 

specifications Technical Data Supplement for Frozen Ground Bison (TDS-BIS-2012),

Technical Data Supplement for Frozen Ground Buffalo (TDS-BUF-2012) and Technical 

Requirements Schedule – Bison Handling and Welfare 2010 (TRS-BHW-2010). All

references to the Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR) are to be 

replaced with “Food Safety and Commodity Specification (FSCS) Division.”
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,073-01

EX PARTE MARTIN PENA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1379020-A IN THE 184TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession with

the intent to deliver cocaine and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his

conviction.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and the State failed to disclose evidence in

violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). The trial court made findings of fact and

concluded that Applicant’s plea was involuntary and the State violated Brady v. Maryland. It
2

recommended that we grant relief. 

We order that this application be filed and set for submission to determine whether (1) the

misconduct in Applicant’s case should be imputed to the prosecution for purposes of Applicant’s

Brady v. Maryland claim; (2) this misconduct is exculpatory; and (3) Applicant’s plea was

involuntary because of “impermissible conduct by state agents.” Brady v. United States, 397 U.S.

742, 757 (1970). The parties shall brief these issues. Oral argument is not permitted.

It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If he is not, the trial court shall determine

whether he is indigent. If he is indigent and desires to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall

appoint an attorney to represent him. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art 26.04. The trial court shall send

to this Court, within 60 days of the date of this order, a supplemental transcript containing: a

confirmation that Applicant is represented by counsel; the order appointing counsel; or a statement

that Applicant is not indigent. All briefs shall be filed with this Court on or before 90 days of the

date of this order.

Filed: November 18, 2015

Do not publish
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Nos. 04-12-00169-CR, 04-12-00170-CR, 04-12-00171-CR, 04-12-00172-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Tamara SCOTCH; Pauline GONZALES; Isabel RANGEL Jr.; Eladio ROCHA,

Appellees

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. B1276, B1277, B1278, B1279

The Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 20, 2012

DISMISSED

The State of Texas has moved to dismiss its appeals numbered 04-12-00169-CR, 04-12-

00170-CR, 04-12-00171-CR, and 04-12-00172-CR pertaining to individual appellees Tamara

Scotch, Pauline Gonzales, Isabel Rangel Jr., and Eladio Rocha, respectively. The State’s motion 

is granted; these appeals are dismissed.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XVI

TRANS-EUROPEAN NETWORKS

TRANS-EUROPEAN NETWORKS

Article 172

(ex Article 156 TEC)

(ex Article 156 TEC)

The guidelines and other measures referred to in Article 171(1) shall be adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

Guidelines and projects of common interest which relate to the territory of a Member State shall require the approval of the Member State concerned.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9867]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7854]

Certification Pursuant to Section 7041(A) of The Department of 
State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
2012 (DIV. I, Pub. L. 112-74)

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State 
pursuant to section 7041(a) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74), I hereby certify that the Government of Egypt is meeting 
its obligations under the 1979 Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register and, 
along with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification, shall be 
reported to Congress.

    Dated: March 8, 2012.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-9867 Filed 4-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
```
October 2, 2015

Mr. Timothy C. Walkey

Advanced Motion Design

156 Kripple Kreek Drive

Sharpsburg, GA 30277

Dear Mr. Walkey:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your July 14, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Advanced Motion Design

filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2927, but we are unable to process your request any further. 

Your petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to 

consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

138 

CA 11-01801 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

TONYA BRIGGS-DANIELS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

RICHARD A. MILLER AND WILLIAM J. WALTERS, 

DOING BUSINESS AS WW SERVICES, 

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

LAW OFFICES OF JAMES MORRIS, BUFFALO (JAMES E. MORRIS OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

LAW OFFICES OF DESTIN SANTACROSE, BUFFALO (CHERYL A. KRZYWICKI OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy

J. Drury, J.), entered November 9, 2010 in a personal injury action. 

The order denied the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment, granted

the cross motion of defendants for summary judgment and dismissed the

complaint.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by the attorneys for the parties and filed on February 6, 2012, 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is dismissed without costs

upon stipulation.

All concur except GORSKI, J., who is not participating.

Entered: February 10, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0186-15

ROBERT LYNN PRIDGEN, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ORDER PURSUANT TO TEXAS RULES OF 

APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 9.10

Per curiam.

ORDER

This cause is before this Court on petition for discretionary review from court of

appeals case number 12-13-00136-CR, trial court case number 29956 in the 3 District

rd

Court of Anderson County.

The Clerk of this Court has discovered sensitive data in the record, namely:

sexually explicit photographs. TEX. R. APP. P. Rule 9.10(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 9.10, the Clerk sought a ruling from the Court and thereafter notified

the parties. The Court now orders the Clerk of this Court to seal the discovered sensitive
Rule 9.10 Order - 2

data from the records identified and listed below. The Court further orders the trial court

clerk, the clerk of the court of appeals, or any entity or individual possessing the

following documents to redact or seal the documents pursuant to this order:

1. Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review

2. Appellant’s Amended Petition for Discretionary Review

Filed: April 14, 2015

Do not publish
Office of the 1400 Independence Avenue, SW 

Deputy Administrator Room 2968-S STOP 0225

 Dairy Program Washington, DC 20250-0225

November 23, 2021

Mr. Mark Lamers, President

Lamers Dairy, Inc.

N410 Speel School Road

Appleton, Wisconsin 54915

Dear Mr. Lamers:

This letter a final response to your petition, received in our office on July 17, 2021, to amend the 

exempt plant definition in the Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMO). Your petition seeks to

increase the exemption level for plants with fluid milk product sales of 150,000 pounds of route 

disposition and sales or less per month to 3 million pounds per month. 

Your petition requests the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) enact changes to 

FMMOs through informal or notice and comment rulemaking rather than through a formal

hearing. As we explained in our August 18, 2021, letter, according to section 608c(17)(E) of the 

Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (AMAA), USDA can only use informal 

rulemaking if the proposed change to the FMMOs does not directly affect milk prices. 

USDA has conducted a preliminary economic analysis of the impact of your proposal on milk 

prices. The analysis assumed that all current regulated handlers with route disposition between 

150,000 and 3 million pounds would become exempt. As a result, the milk associated with those 

plants was removed from its respective FMMO pool and the pools were re-run. Our analysis 

indicates that increasing the exempt plant limit to 3 million pounds of route disposition could 

impact milk prices received by dairy farmers. Therefore, the AMAA prohibits the Secretary from 

granting your rulemaking request. 

Thank you for your interest in the FMMO program. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Dana H. Coale

Deputy Administrator

USDA-AMS-Dairy Program