alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART TWO

NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP OF THE UNION

NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP OF THE UNION

Article 19

(ex Article 13 TEC)

(ex Article 13 TEC)

1.   Without prejudice to the other provisions of the Treaties and within the limits of the powers conferred by them upon the Union, the Council, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may take appropriate action to combat discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.

2.   By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, may adopt the basic principles of Union incentive measures, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States, to support action taken by the Member States in order to contribute to the achievement of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 1 4 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk August 1 4 , 2020

161 492 ( 20 )

In re CERTIFIED QUESTIONS FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,

WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN,

SOUTHERN DIVISION

_________________________________________

MIDWEST INSTITUTE OF HEALTH, PLLC,

doing business as GRAND HEALTH PARTNERS,

WELLSTON MEDICAL CENTER, PLLC,

PRIMARY HEALTH SERVICES, PC, and

JEFFERY GULICK,

Plaintiffs,

SC: 161492

v USDC

- WD: 1:20

- cv

- 414

GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN

ATTORNEY GENERAL, and MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

SERVICES DIRECTOR,

Defendants.

_________________________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of Michigan Epid emiologists to file a brief

amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on August 12, 2020, is accepted

for filing

.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 35054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13748]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary

All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; United 
States City Average

    Pursuant to Section 33105(c) of Title 49, United States Code, and 
the delegation of the Secretary of Transportation's responsibilities 
under that Act to the Administrator of the Federal Highway 
Administration (49 CFR 501.2 (a)(9)), the Secretary of Labor has 
certified to the Administrator and published this notice in the Federal 
Register that the United States City Average All Items Consumer Price 
Index for All Urban Consumers (1967=100) increased 121.1 percent from 
its 1984 annual average of 311.1 to its 2012 annual average of 687.761.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on the 21 day of May 2013.
Seth D. Harris,
Acting Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2013-13748 Filed 6-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Quarterly Report of Goodys Family Clothing, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Goodfriend, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Robert M. Goodfriend Robert M. Goodfriend
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
May 23, 2005
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE V

AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

CHAPTER 1

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Article 74

(ex Article 66 TEC)

(ex Article 66 TEC)

The Council shall adopt measures to ensure administrative cooperation between the relevant departments of the Member States in the areas covered by this Title, as well as between those departments and the Commission. It shall act on a Commission proposal, subject to Article 76, and after consulting the European Parliament.

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MIRCHO MURDJEFF and

EL DIABLO ENTERPRIZE CORPORATION
, Appellant s ,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE (CWALT 2007

- HY4)

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2759

[ August 9, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barry J. Stone

, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No.

CACE10014628

.

Theresa B. Edwards and David F. Edwards of American Ju stice, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant s

.

Ile en J. Cantor and Ronald M. Gaché of Shapiro, Fishman & Gaché, LLP, Boca Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, L EVINE and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Terrance Singh, Respondent.

—Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rutledge, J.), dated March 19, 1990, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss Queens County Indictment No. 6335/89.

*639Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is denied, the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

On the scheduled trial date, the People requested a three to four week adjournment in order to produce the complainant who had not appeared despite several attempts by the prosecutor to secure his attendance for trial. The court denied this request, and granted the defendant’s oral motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground of the "People’s inability to proceed”.

The dismissal of the indictment was clearly improper as it was not based upon any of the grounds enumerated in CPL 210.20 (1) and did not satisfy the requirements for dismissal in the interest of justice pursuant to CPL 210.40 (1) *(see, People v Moore,*158 AD2d 721, 722; *People v Sullivan,*142 AD2d 695). Moreover, the court was without authority to dismiss the indictment because of a perceived failure to prosecute, or for reasons of calendar control *(see, People v Douglass,*60 NY2d 194; *People v Moore, supra).*Balletta, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1569 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1569

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff and Yuma to the 
list of locations in which court shall be held in the judicial district 
                       for the State of Arizona.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT COURTS IN THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT FOR THE STATE OF 
              ARIZONA.

    Section 82 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, and Tucson'' and inserting ``Flagstaff, 
Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson, and Yuma''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 10, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1569

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff and Yuma to the 
list of locations in which court shall be held in the judicial district 
                       for the State of Arizona.
```
# C_2016202EN.01039601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/396 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/396

---

Article 14

Right to education

1.   Everyone has the right to education and to have access to vocational and continuing training.

2.   This right includes the possibility to receive free compulsory education.

3.   The freedom to found educational establishments with due respect for democratic principles and the right of parents to ensure the education and teaching of their children in conformity with their religious, philosophical and pedagogical convictions shall be respected, in accordance with the national laws governing the exercise of such freedom and right.

---
# C_2016202EN.01040101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/401 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/401

---

Article 37

Environmental protection

A high level of environmental protection and the improvement of the quality of the environment must be integrated into the policies of the Union and ensured in accordance with the principle of sustainable development.

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1544

_____________________________

MARKTAVIOS MARTIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John L. Miller, Judge.

November 15, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and KELSEY and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Marktavios Martin, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Tabitha Herrera, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Livestock, Poultry, and 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Grain Market News Room 2619-S, STOP 0252

Division Washington, DC 20250-0252

USDA Market News Revises Regional Swine Market Reports 

On July 31, 2019, USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) will revise its Livestock 

Mandatory Reporting (LMR) direct swine reports to provide more continuous coverage of the 

regional negotiated swine markets. 

Since the implementation of LMR in 2001, the volume of barrows and gilts purchased on a 

negotiated basis has declined from 17 percent of the market to about 1 percent today. The 

thinness of the negotiated market has made it increasingly difficult for AMS to publish regional 

market information while maintaining the confidentiality requirements set forth in the statute. 

As requested by the pork industry, AMS will publish only weighted average prices for carcass 

and live basis negotiated barrows and gilts and not show the daily volumes or price ranges on the 

Iowa-Minnesota, Western Cornbelt, and Eastern Cornbelt regional daily and prior day swine 

purchase reports going forward. This revision allows AMS to publish as much regional data as 

possible while preserving confidentiality. The National swine purchase reports will continue to 

include volume, price ranges, and weighted average prices for the negotiated barrow and gilt

market. The other swine purchase types – other market formula, swine or pork market formula, 

and other purchase arrangement – are not impacted by this revision.

To access AMS direct swine reports, visit: www.ams.usda.gov/market-news/swine-directreports. For more information on LMR, visit: www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/mmr. For 

additional information, contact Taylor Cox, Livestock, Poultry, and Grain Market News Field 

Chief, at (515) 284-4460.
# C_2016202EN.01013701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/137 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/137

---

Article 199

(ex Article 183 TEC)

(ex Article 183 TEC)

Association shall have the following objectives.

| 1. | Member States shall apply to their trade with the countries and territories the same treatment as they accord each other pursuant to the Treaties. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Member States shall apply to their trade with the countries and territories the same treatment as they accord each other pursuant to the Treaties.

| 2. | Each country or territory shall apply to its trade with Member States and with the other countries and territories the same treatment as that which it applies to the European State with which is has special relations. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each country or territory shall apply to its trade with Member States and with the other countries and territories the same treatment as that which it applies to the European State with which is has special relations.

| 3. | The Member States shall contribute to the investments required for the progressive development of these countries and territories. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Member States shall contribute to the investments required for the progressive development of these countries and territories.

| 4. | For investments financed by the Union, participation in tenders and supplies shall be open on equal terms to all natural and legal persons who are nationals of a Member State or of one of the countries and territories. |
| --- | --- |

4.

For investments financed by the Union, participation in tenders and supplies shall be open on equal terms to all natural and legal persons who are nationals of a Member State or of one of the countries and territories.

| 5. | In relations between Member States and the countries and territories the right of establishment of nationals and companies or firms shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions and procedures laid down in the Chapter relating to the right of establishment and on a non-discriminatory basis, subject to any special provisions laid down pursuant to Article 203. |
| --- | --- |

5.

In relations between Member States and the countries and territories the right of establishment of nationals and companies or firms shall be regulated in accordance with the provisions and procedures laid down in the Chapter relating to the right of establishment and on a non-discriminatory basis, subject to any special provisions laid down pursuant to Article 203.

---
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMENT O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D . C . 

### ARTMFNTOF

;n v! 0 P 2

^ 5 b

Motio no f AMERICA NEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . fo r confidentia l treatmen t unde r Rul e 1 2 (For m 41 , Schedul e B-7 ) DOT-OST-1995-56 9

MOTIO NO F AMERICA

NEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . FO RCONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT XJNDE RRUL E 1 2 Communication s wit hrespec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t to ; DANIE L P . CARTON Presiden t America nEagl e Airlines , Inc . P.O . Bo x619616 , M D 549 4 DFWAirport , Texa s 7526 1 KATHLEE NSOLE D Vic e Presiden t & Genera l Counse l America nEagl e Airlines , Inc . P.O . Bo x619616 , M D 549 4 DF WAirport , Texa s 7526 1 (817 ) 967-157 4 kate . soled(3a

a . com CAR L B . NELSON Associat e Genera l Counse l America n Airlines , Inc . 110 1 17t hStreet , N.W . Suit e 60 0 Washington , D.C . 2003 6 (202 ) 496-564 7 carl.nelson@aa.co m

Novembe r 14 , 201 1BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMENT O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D . C .

Motio no f AMERICA NEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . fo r confidentia l treatmen t unde r Rul e 1 2 (For m 41 , Schedul e B-7 ) DOT-OST-1995-56 9

MOTIO NO F AMERICA

NEAGL E AIRLINES , INC . FO RCONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDE RRUL E 1 2 America nEagl e Airlines , Inc. , unde r 1 4 CF R302.12 , herebymove s tha t it s Form41 , Schedul e B- 7 fo r 3Q201 1 b e accorde d confidentia l treatmen t and b e withhel d frompubli c disclosure . Th e informatio n fo r whic hconfidentia l treatmen t i s requeste d pertain s t o America n Eagle' s airframe s an d air

craf t engin e acquisition s and retirements .

I naccordanc e wit hth e Department' s Fina l Rul e o nSub

mittin g Airlin e Dat a vi a th e Internet , 7 5 Fed . Reg . 41580 , 41582 , w e ar e uploadin g ou r confidentia l repor t electronicall y t o th e followin g website : http://esubmit.rita.dot.go v O nJun e 5 , 1995 , Jame s W . Mitchell , Director , Offic e o f Airlin e Statistics , th e Departmen t grante d confidentia l treat
men t fo r a 10-yea r perio d t o simila r dat a file d byAmerica n Airlines . Fo r th e reason s state d i n Mr . Mitchell' s letter , th e Departmen t shoul d gran t th e same relie f here .- 2 -

WHEREFORE , America n Eagl e move s tha t it s B- 7 fo r 3Q201 1 b e withhel d frompubli c disclosur e unde r Rul e 1 2 fo r a perio d o f 1 0 years . Respectfull ysubmitted . 

# GM M

StL^

CAR L B . NELSON Associat e Genera l Counse l America nAirlines , Inc . O nbehal f o f America n Eagl e Airlines , Inc . Novembe r 14 , 201 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, v. R. R. ADAMSON (also Known as Rhoda Rindge Adamson).

No. 9398.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 18, 1939.

Ben Harrison, U. S. Atty., and Eugene Harpole, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Joseph D. Brady, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, DENMAN, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal in above-cause dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.
Opinion issued April 21, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00111-CV

———————————

LAURIE HART, Appellant

V.

ROBERT WAYNE HART, Appellee

On Appeal from the 247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1999-19162

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Laurie Hart, has neither paid the required fees nor established 

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 

§ 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme 
2

Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on 

Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After 

being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not 

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, Marc Wolfsohn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 'SS' 1350, as adopted pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

                                                    /s/ Marc Wolfsohn
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Marc Wolfsohn
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    August 12, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
May 4, 2012 

Mr. Lee Soltani 

16 Blue Pt. 

Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 

Dear Mr. Soltani: 

This is in response to your December 27, 2011, letter sent to the public docket 

(No. FAA-2011-0096) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for a second 

exemption from § 65.71 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The FAA 

granted that request in Exemption No. 10221. 

On January 18, 2011, you previously petitioned the FAA for an exemption from § 65.71 to 

allow you to be eligible for a mechanic certificate and associated ratings although you are 

hearing impaired and unable to speak the English language (also in public docket No. 

FAA-2011-0096). By letter dated March 3, 2011, the FAA granted your request for 

exemption (Exemption No. 10221), subject to the conditions and limitations of the 

exemption, including the date it ends (March 31, 2013). Condition number 1 clearly states 

that you must meet all the other portions of § 65.71(a)(2) and show your ability to read, 

write, and understand the English language. 

While the FAA understands your frustrations regarding the suspended exam mentioned in 

your December 27, 2011 letter, a second exemption is not necessary as the initial grant of 

exemption is still valid until March 31, 2013. The grant of exemption was not affected by 

this suspended exam. The FAA encourages you to take those steps necessary to meet the 

conditions and limitation in the exemption by March 31, 2013. 

The FAA recommends that you make an appointment with an examiner of your choice or 

return to the same examiner and continue with your pursuit to a successful completion 
2

 of the FAA’s prescribed testing requirements.

You may also contact your local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) at the Long Beach 

FSDO, John Wayne Airport, 2701 Fairview Road, Costa Mesa, CA 92626. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service