alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VII

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

CHAPTER 1

RULES ON COMPETITION

SECTION 2

SECTION 2

AIDS GRANTED BY STATES

Article 108

(ex Article 88 TEC)

(ex Article 88 TEC)

1.   The Commission shall, in cooperation with Member States, keep under constant review all systems of aid existing in those States. It shall propose to the latter any appropriate measures required by the progressive development or by the functioning of the internal market.

2.   If, after giving notice to the parties concerned to submit their comments, the Commission finds that aid granted by a State or through State resources is not compatible with the internal market having regard to Article 107, or that such aid is being misused, it shall decide that the State concerned shall abolish or alter such aid within a period of time to be determined by the Commission.

If the State concerned does not comply with this decision within the prescribed time, the Commission or any other interested State may, in derogation from the provisions of Articles 258 and 259, refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union direct.

On application by a Member State, the Council may, acting unanimously, decide that aid which that State is granting or intends to grant shall be considered to be compatible with the internal market, in derogation from the provisions of Article 107 or from the regulations provided for in Article 109, if such a decision is justified by exceptional circumstances. If, as regards the aid in question, the Commission has already initiated the procedure provided for in the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the fact that the State concerned has made its application to the Council shall have the effect of suspending that procedure until the Council has made its attitude known.

If, however, the Council has not made its attitude known within three months of the said application being made, the Commission shall give its decision on the case.

3.   The Commission shall be informed, in sufficient time to enable it to submit its comments, of any plans to grant or alter aid. If it considers that any such plan is not compatible with the internal market having regard to Article 107, it shall without delay initiate the procedure provided for in paragraph 2. The Member State concerned shall not put its proposed measures into effect until this procedure has resulted in a final decision.

4.   The Commission may adopt regulations relating to the categories of State aid that the Council has, pursuant to Article 109, determined may be exempted from the procedure provided for by paragraph 3 of this Article.

---
# C_2016203EN.01002201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/22

---

Article 45

Undertakings which are of fundamental importance to the development of the nuclear industry in the Community may be established as Joint Undertakings within the meaning of this Treaty, in accordance with the following Articles.

---
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO §906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 16, 2011/s/ Dean L. CashDean L. Cash President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Research & Promotion Division 1400 Independence Avenue, SW. 

Livestock & Poultry Program Room 2627-S, STOP 0251

 Washington, D.C. 20250-0251

 

November 9, 2021 

Mr. Nicholas Nesson

1491 Springvale Road 

Morristown, TN 37813 

Dear Mr. Nesson:

I am following up on the letter that was sent to Mr. Bryan Hanson on August 3, 2021, which 

provided an extension of 60-days to collect additional signatures to the petition for an up-ordown vote on the beef checkoff program. As you are aware, that deadline was October 3, 2021. 

You then had an additional 30 days to submit the signatures to USDA. 

The deadline for you to submit signatures has passed. USDA did not receive any signatures 

from you, therefore we consider this matter closed. Should you decide to begin a new petition in 

the future, you will need to collect new signatures. 

I appreciate your passion for the cattle industry and in representing your fellow producers. If 

you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to me at 202-503-6877. 

Sincerely, 

Elizabeth Flores

Director
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **4**
**- 1168** 

RICHARD A. CAPELL ,

P laintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

C. LEE CARTER, III; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; YORK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; TFC DW JENKI NS; YORK COUNTY DEPUTY ALDRIDGE ,
Defendants

- Appellee s ,
and

TROOPER SCDPS; DEPUTY YORK COUNTY ,
Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Terry L. Wooten , Chief District Judge. ( 3 :1 3

- cv
- 0 0586

- TLW )

Submitted : April 17, 2014 Decided: April 22, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Richard A. Capell , Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Matthews, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina , for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Richard A. Capell appeals the district court ’ s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint raising claims under Title II of the

Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12132

(2006), 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) , and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 , 1986

(2 006) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Capell v. Carter , No. 3:13

- cv
- 00586

- TLW (D.S.C.

Jan. 16, 2014)

. We deny Capell’s requests for video evidence,
for appoi ntment of counsel, to seal his case, for waiver of
fees, and to serve documents electronically. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before th is court and
argument would not aid t he decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 21


                  BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


The  following is a list of the  significant  subsidiaries  of  registrant as of
November 30, 1997:
<CAPTION>

                                                                 PERCENTAGE
                                                                 OF VOTING
                                                                 SECURITIES
                                             STATE OF            OWNED BY
NAME                                         INCORPORATION       REGISTRANT
----                                         -------------       ----------
<S>                                          <C>                 <C>

Durr-Fillauer Medical, Inc.                  Delaware                 100%

Bergen Brunswig Drug Company                 California               (1)

Bergen Brunswig Medical Corporation
  (formerly known as Durr Medical
  Corporation)                               Alabama                  (1)




<FN>

(1)      100% owned by Durr-Fillauer Medical, Inc.
</FN>
</TABLE>



















                                 EXH 21 - Page 1
#### Mazel Setton et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Appellant.

—In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (6) for leave to serve an amended notice of claim nunc pro tunc, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated November 13, 1989, which granted the application.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as an exercise of discretion, with costs, and the petitioners’ application is denied.

The original notice of claim in this case, involving an allegedly defective sidewalk condition, misidentified the actual location where the claim arose and was, therefore, inadequate to meet the statutory requirements *(see,*General Municipal Law § 50-e [2]). The appellant conducted a prompt investigation but at the wrong site as specified in the notice of claim. Thus, the mistake in the notice clearly prejudiced the appellant by depriving it of the opportunity to conduct a prompt, meaningful investigation to assess the merits of the petitioners’ claim *(see, O’Brien v City of Syracuse,*54 NY2d 353, 358; *724
      *Krug v City of New York,*147 AD2d 449). The testimony of the petitioner Mazel Setton at the Comptroller’s hearing, conducted more than five months after the claim arose, did not serve to dissipate the prejudice to the appellant since it contradicted the notice of claim and served to obscure the correct location of the accident *(see, Caselli v City of New York,*105 AD2d 251, 254). Contrary to the petitioners’ contention, the location of the accident provided in the amended notice of claim annexed to the instant application differed materially from the hearing testimony. We, therefore, conclude that the discrepancies in the various descriptions of the accident site rendered it impossible for the appellant to conduct a meaningful investigation. We further note that the notice of the alleged sidewalk defect served on the New York City Department of Transportation approximately three months prior to the accident at issue is not an adequate substitute for a notice of claim which describes the accident site with sufficient particularity. Accordingly, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to permit the petitioners to amend their notice of claim *(see, e.g., Serrano v City of New York,*143 AD2d 652; *Martire v City of New York,*129 AD2d 567; *Matter of Malla v City of New York,*129 AD2d 580). Thompson, J. R, Kunzeman, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
D.5. Wyoming, Montana and Idaho

for 2006

Note: The following monitor values were obtained from the website

http://views.cira.colostate.edu/web/

2010 at these locations.



### North Absaroka Wilderness, WY

Wyoming, Montana and Idaho IMPROVE Monitoring

for 2006 -2010 (Fine Mass)

The following monitor values were obtained from the website

http://views.cira.colostate.edu/web/

. These graphs show the PM2.5 monitor values from 200 6 to



### North Absaroka Wilderness, WY IMPROVE Monitoring Data

These graphs show the PM2.5 monitor values from 200 6 to

### Bridger Wilderness, WY

Yellowstone National Park, WY

### Gate of the Mountains, MT

Sula Peak, MT

### Cabinet Mountains, MT

Sawtooth Wilderness Area, ID

### Craters of the Moon Wilderness Area, ID
# C_2016202EN.01019601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/196 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/196

---

Article 352

(ex Article 308 TEC)

(ex Article 308 TEC)

1.   If action by the Union should prove necessary, within the framework of the policies defined in the Treaties, to attain one of the objectives set out in the Treaties, and the Treaties have not provided the necessary powers, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, shall adopt the appropriate measures. Where the measures in question are adopted by the Council in accordance with a special legislative procedure, it shall also act unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.

2.   Using the procedure for monitoring the subsidiarity principle referred to in Article 5(3) of the Treaty on European Union, the Commission shall draw national Parliaments' attention to proposals based on this Article.

3.   Measures based on this Article shall not entail harmonisation of Member States' laws or regulations in cases where the Treaties exclude such harmonisation.

4.   This Article cannot serve as a basis for attaining objectives pertaining to the common foreign and security policy and any acts adopted pursuant to this Article shall respect the limits set out in Article 40, second paragraph, of the Treaty on European Union.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1373 

To protect, for current and future generations, the watershed, ecosystem, 

and cultural heritage of the Grand Canyon region in the State of Arizona, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2019 

Mr. GRIJALVA (for himself, Mr. O’HALLERAN, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. 

LOWENTHAL, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. COX of California, Ms. 

HAALAND, Mr. LEVIN of California, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. 

SABLAN, Mr. CARBAJAL, Ms. DEGETTE, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. 

GALLEGO, Mr. MCEACHIN, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. CASTEN of Illinois, and 

Mr. COHEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To protect, for current and future generations, the watershed, ecosystem, and cultural heritage of the Grand Canyon region in the State of Arizona, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grand Canyon Centen5 nial Protection Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1373 IH

1 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL LAND FROM MINING 

2 LAWS. 

3 (a) DEFINITION OF MAP.—In this Act, the term 

4 ‘‘Map’’ means the Bureau of Land Management map enti5 tled ‘‘Grand Canyon Centennial Protection Act’’ and dated 

6 February 26, 2019. 

7 (b) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

8 the approximately 1,006,545 acres of Federal lands in the 

9 State of Arizona within the area depicted on the Map, in10 cluding any land or interest in land that is acquired by 

11 the United States after the date of enactment of this Act, 

12 are hereby withdrawn from— 

13 (1) all forms of entry, appropriation, and dis14 posal under the public land laws; 

15 (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining 

16 laws; and 

17 (3) operation of the mineral leasing and geo18 thermal leasing laws and mineral materials laws. 

19 (c) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The Map shall be kept 

20 on file and made available for public inspection in the ap21 propriate offices of the Forest Service and the Bureau of 

22 Land Management. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                       EXHIBIT 3

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                     HEALTH CARE AND RETIREMENT CORPORATION
                     --------------------------------------


         Health Care and Retirement Corporation, a corporation existing under
the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, at a regularly
scheduled meeting held on January 29, 1998 adopted resolutions proposing and
declaring advisable the following amendment to Article Four of the Certificate
of Incorporation of the Corporation:

                  RESOLVED, that the first paragraph of Article IV of the
         Certificate of Incorporation is amended to increase from 80,000,000 to
         160,000,000 the authorized shares of Common Stock of the Corporation
         and that such first paragraph, after amendment, shall read:

                  "The total number of shares of capital stock which the
         corporation shall have authority to issue is One Hundred Sixty-Five
         Million (165,000,000), consisting of One Hundred Sixty Million
         (160,000,000) shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share
         (hereinafter called the "Common Stock") and Five Million (5,000,000)
         shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share (hereinafter called
         "Preferred Stock").

         SECOND: The Board of Directors of the Corporation approved the
foregoing amendment pursuant to the provisions of Sections 141(f) and 242 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         THIRD: The stockholders of the Corporation approved the foregoing
amendment pursuant to the provisions of Sections 242 and 245 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, and the foregoing amendments have been
duly adopted in accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.

<PAGE>   2



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Health Care and Retirement Corporation has caused
this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by R. Jeffrey Bixler its Vice
President this 5th day of June, 1998.


                                    HEALTH CARE AND RETIREMENT
                                    CORPORATION



                                    By:
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             R. Jeffrey Bixler, Vice President
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 07-13-00034-CR OFFENSE: 30.02F2

Terry Glynn Speed v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Johnson

II3-/5

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 249th District Court

DATE: 01/09/15 Publish: NO TCCASE#: F46764

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Terry Glynn Speed v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#: 113-tST

P£fl StL Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

R^fJS&l JUDGE:

DATE: 03ll#/**>'•* SIGNED: PC:

JUDGE: fMUAAUi*^ PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
ACCEPTED

04-14-00569-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

4/20/2015 4:05:53 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 04/20/2015 4:05:53 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

SUNTRUST BANK                                              CHARLES J. KLENK
Mail Code 1042                                             First Vice President
777 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida  33131-2803
Tel 305.579.7340
Fax 305.579.7133


March 19, 2002

Ms. Diane M. Barrett
Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
11960 SW 144th Street
Miami, Florida 33186

Re:  Extension of the SunTrust Credit Agreement and Modification to the Note

Dear Diane:

SunTrust is pleased to inform Noven Pharmaceuticals that it has formally renewed
the existing $10,000,000 line of credit for one year under the existing terms
and conditions. We are most pleased to continue the relationship between our two
organizations.

 In order to document this extension, please review the following modification
to the Credit Agreement originally dated December 5, 2000 ("The Agreement") and
the related Note:

THE AGREEMENT IS HEREBY MODIFIED BY REPLACING THE DEFINITION OF "COMMITMENT
TERMINATION DATE" IN ITS ENTIRETY WITH THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE: "COMMITMENT
TERMINATION DATE SHALL MEAN APRIL 30, 2003".

If you agree to this extension and the language referred to above, please sign
where indicated below. Diane, on behalf of the entire SunTrust team, please
accept our heartfelt thanks for the opportunity to continue working with
everyone there at Noven.

Sincerely,

/s/ Charles J. Klenk
-------------------------------
Charles J. Klenk
First Vice President

Accepted and Agreed:

NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.                     SUNTRUST BANK
  a Delaware Corporation


By: /s/ DIANE M. BARRETT                        By: /s/ CHARLES J. KLENK
    --------------------------------                ----------------------------
    Diane M. Barrett                                Charles J. Klenk
    Vice President, Finance & Treasurer             First Vice President