alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00115-CV

Gerald VERGOTT,

Appellant

v.

Birdy 

BIRDY APARTMENTS, LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CV00393

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2015

DISMISSED

A copy of appellant’s notice of appeal was filed in this court on March 2, 2015. On that same 

date, the clerk of the court notified appellant in writing that the appellate record did not reflect payment 

of the $195 filing fee nor any showing that appellant is excused by statute or rule from paying the filing 

fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20. Appellant was also notified that the record did not contain a docketing 

statement. 

On March 19, 2015, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing by April 2, 2015, 

that either: (1) the filing fee has been paid; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the 
04-15-00115-CV

filing fee. Appellant was advised that if he failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would 

be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c). Appellant did not respond. 

The appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the filing fee. See id.

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
EXHIBIT 23.5
                                                                   ------------

                            DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON
                       4925 Greenville Avenue, Suite 400
                               One Energy Square
                              Dallas, Texas 75206
                                                                  TELEPHONE
                                                               (214) 368-6391
                                                                     FAX
                                                               (214) 369-4061
                                                                www.demac.com



                                 March 29, 2007


Nexen Inc.
801-7th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, AB
T2P 3P7

Gentlemen:


        We hereby  consent to references to our firm relating to the evaluation
of certain oil and gas  properties of Nexen Inc. (the  "Company")  contained in
the  section  entitled  "Basis  of  Reserves   Estimates"   within   "Reserves,
Production, and Related Information" as set out in Part I, Items 1 & 2 Business
and  Properties of the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K/A  Amendment No. 1
for the year ended December 31, 2005.


                                                 Very truly yours,


                                           /s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton
                                           ----------------------------
                                             DeGOLYER AND MacNAUGHTON
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 910 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide eligibility under certain 

highway programs for projects for the installation of vehicle-to-infrastructure communication equipment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2015 

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan (for herself and Mrs. LAWRENCE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide eligibility 

under certain highway programs for projects for the installation of vehicle-to-infrastructure communication 

equipment, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vehicle-to-Infrastruc5 ture Safety Technology Investment Flexibility Act of 

6 2015’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 910 IH

1 SEC. 2. VEHICLE-TO-INFRASTRUCTURE COMMUNICATION 

2 EQUIPMENT PROJECTS. 

3 (a) VEHICLE-TO-INFRASTRUCTURE COMMUNICATION

4 EQUIPMENT DEFINED.—Section 101(a) of title 23, 

5 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(35) VEHICLE-TO-INFRASTRUCTURE COMMU8 NICATION EQUIPMENT.—The term ‘vehicle-to-infra9 structure communication equipment’ means equip10 ment that provides a wireless exchange of critical 

11 safety and operational data between highway infra12 structure and vehicles, intended primarily to avoid 

13 or mitigate vehicle collisions and enable a wide range 

14 of other safety, mobility, and environmental bene15 fits.’’. 

16 (b) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS UNDER NATIONAL HIGH17 WAY PERFORMANCE PROGRAM.—Section 119(d)(2) of 

18 such title is amended by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(Q) Installation of vehicle-to-infrastruc20 ture communication equipment.’’. 

21 (c) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS UNDER SURFACE TRANS22 PORTATION PROGRAM.—Section 133(b) of such title is 

23 amended by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(27) Installation of vehicle-to-infrastructure 

25 communication equipment.’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 910 IH

1 (d) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS UNDER HIGHWAY SAFETY

2 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.—Section 148(a)(4)(B) of such 

3 title is amended by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(xxv) Installation of vehicle-to-infra5 structure communication equipment.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly
Report of Equus Total Return, Inc. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”),
I, John A Hardy, Executive Chairman of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | To
my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Fund.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                         
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Dated: May 16, 2011 |  | /s/ John A. Hardy                       
|                    |  | John A. Hardy
        Executive Chairman
EXHIBIT 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Medical Security
Group, Inc. (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Gary D. Guengerich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/S/GARY D. GUENGERICH
------------------------------------
Gary D. Guengerich
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: ADAM PORRAS

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00115-CR

Appeal from the

106th Judicial District Court

of Gaines County, Texas

(TC# 22-5803)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal of the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s pretrial application for writ 

of habeas corpus seeking a bond reduction. We dismiss this appeal as moot.

1

Appellant failed to timely file an Appellant’s Brief or a motion for extension of time to file 

same. Accordingly, on August 31, 2022, we issued a letter to Appellant directing him to file an 

extension motion and his brief within ten days. When Appellant failed to do so, we abated this 

appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether Appellant 

wished to pursue the appeal and whether he had been deprived of effective assistance of counsel.

The trial court conducted the hearing and entered findings, concluding that, following a bargained1 This case was transferred from our sister court in Eastland (11th District) pursuant to the Texas Supreme Court’s 

docket equalization efforts. See TEX.GOV’T CODE ANN.section 73.001. We follow the precedent of the Eastland Court 

of Appeals to the extent they might conflict with our own. See TEX.R.APP.P. 41.3.
2

for guilty plea—wherein Appellant pleaded guilty to lesser-included offenses of two of the charged 

counts in exchange for dismissal of all remaining counts—Appellant no longer desired to pursue 

this appeal. The trial court also found Appellant had not been deprived of effective assistance of 

counsel.

Where appellant has been convicted of the underlying offenses, or the offenses have been 

dismissed, his appeal from the pretrial habeas application for a reduction of bond becomes moot. 

See Saucedo v. State, 795 S.W.2d 8, 9 (Tex.App—Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, no pet.)(finding 

issues regarding appellant’s pretrial restraint rendered moot by entry of his guilty plea to the 

underlying criminal offense because he is now confined based on judgment and sentence, not on 

the complained-of process underlying his original detention); State v. Golding, 398 S.W.3d 745, 

747 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, pet. ref’d)(legal issues raised in habeas application are 

rendered moot where the premise of habeas application is “destroyed by subsequent 

developments”); Duggan v. State,No. 01-90-00379-CR, 1991 WL 67006, at *1 (Tex.App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] May 2, 1991, no pet.)(per curiam)(not designated for publication)(dismissing 

as moot pretrial habeas writ seeking bond reduction where appellant pleaded guilty to the 

underlying offenses).

We adopt the trial court’s findings and dismiss this appeal as moot.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

October 26, 2022

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yang Holding Company ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I. James
Chow, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          Material respects, the financial condition and result of operation of
          the Company.

                                           /s/ James Chow
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           James Chow
                                           President, Treasurer and
                                           Secretary. Principal
                                           Financial and Accounting Officer.

January 12, 2005
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L U IS H U M B E R T O R O D R IG U E Z , a. k. a. H um bert o R od ri gu ez , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 73474 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 708- 506 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r10, 2012 ** B efo re: W A R D L A W , C L IF T O N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L ui s H um be rt o R odr i gue z , anat i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s . W e h av e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e 

# FI LED SEP 18 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 73474 2 r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , I

tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 3 2 1 F . 3 d8 8 9 , 8 9 4 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. In hi s openi ng bri ef

, R od ri gu ezfa i l s t o add re ss , and there fore has w ai ved any c hal l enge t o, the B IA ’ s di sposi t i ve det erm i nat i on thatthe m ot i on t o reopen w a s u n tim e ly . Se e M

a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d12 56 , 12 59 -60 (9th C i r. 19 96 ) ( i ss ues notspec i fi ca l l y r ai se d andar gu ed i n a party’ s openi ng bri ef ar e w ai ved). B e c aus e the B I A ’ s unt i m e l i ne s s de t e rm i nat i ons i s di s pos i t i ve , w e do not reach R o dri g u ez’ s rem ai n i n g co n t en t i o n s. P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D .
##### 



EXHIBIT 10(xvii)  CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT
       Term
 Termination of Employment
 Termination by Camco in Connection with a Change of Control
 (i) Camco shall promptly pay to the Employee or to his beneficiaries,
dependents or estate an amount equal to two times the amount of the Employees
annual compensation as most recently set prior to the occurrence of the Change of
Control;
 1




---



##### 



(ii) The Employer shall pay the premiums required to maintain coverage for the
Employee and his eligible dependents under the health insurance plan of Camco or the
Bank in which the Employee is a participant immediately prior to the Change of
Control in accordance with the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1985, as amended, until the earliest of (A) the second anniversary of the
termination of the Employees employment or (B) the date on which the Employee is
eligible to be included in another employers benefit plans as a full-time employee;
and
 (iii) The Employee shall not be required to mitigate the amount of any payment
provided for in this Agreement by seeking other employment or otherwise, nor shall
any amounts received from other employment or otherwise by the Employee offset in
any manner the obligations of Camco hereunder, except as specifically stated in
subparagraph (b).
  Termination by the Employee in Connection with a Change of Control
 (i) the present capacity or circumstances in which the Employee is employed
immediately prior to the completion of the Change of Control are materially changed,
in the reasonable opinion of the Employee (including, without limitation, a material
reduction in responsibilities or authority or a reduction in salary);(ii) the Employee is required to move his personal residence, or perform his
principal executive functions, more than thirty-five (35) miles from his primary
office as of the date of the commencement of the Term of this Agreement; or(iii) Camco otherwise breaches this Agreement in any material respect.
  -2-




---



##### 



Death of the Employee
 Golden Parachute Provision
 Definition of Change of Control
 Confidential Information
 Nonassignability
 -3-




---



##### 



No Attachment
 Binding Agreement
 Amendment of Agreement
 Waiver
 Severability
 Headings
 Governing Law; Regulatory Authority
 Effect of Prior Agreements
 -4-




---



##### 



Notices
  
      Attest:
    
    CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION______________________________
    
    By
___________________________________EMPLOYEE______________________________________
 -5-




---



##### 



ATTACHMENT A
 
 -6-
# C_2016202EN.01018601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/186 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/186

---

Article 317

(ex Article 274 TEC)

(ex Article 274 TEC)

The Commission shall implement the budget in cooperation with the Member States, in accordance with the provisions of the regulations made pursuant to Article 322, on its own responsibility and within the limits of the appropriations, having regard to the principles of sound financial management. Member States shall cooperate with the Commission to ensure that the appropriations are used in accordance with the principles of sound financial management.

The regulations shall lay down the control and audit obligations of the Member States in the implementation of the budget and the resulting responsibilities. They shall also lay down the responsibilities and detailed rules for each institution concerning its part in effecting its own expenditure.

Within the budget, the Commission may, subject to the limits and conditions laid down in the regulations made pursuant to Article 322, transfer appropriations from one chapter to another or from one subdivision to another.

---
<PAGE>
                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our  reports dated February  5, 1996 included (or  incorporated by reference) in
this Form  10-K into  Dole Food  Company, Inc.'s  previously filed  Registration
Statements  on Form  S-3 Registration  Nos. 33-41480  and 33-64984  and Form S-8
Registration Nos. 2-87475, 33-594, 33-28782, 33-60643, 33-60641 and 33-42152.
 
                                          /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
February 5, 1996
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 15, 2019

NO. 03-17-00327-CR

Timothy Anthony, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH 

AFFIRMED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgments revoking community supervision entered by the trial court. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s judgments of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s judgments. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of 

costs is made.
##### 



EXHIBIT 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints John W. Huey, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact
and agents, with full power of substitution and revocation in each, for
him/her and in his/her name, place and stead, to sign any or all reports
(including reports on Form 10-K, Form 3, Form 4, Form 5, Schedule 13-D,
Schedule 13-G, and Form 144), and any amendments thereto, required or
permitted to be filed by him under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or
the Securities Act of 1933, with respect to beneficial ownership of, and
transactions in, equity securities of BUTLER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Delaware
corporation (the company), and with respect to other matters relating to the
company, and to file the same, with all documents required or permitted to be
filed in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming
all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

|       |  |                  |  |                                                   
|------ |  | ---------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|DATED: |  | January 14, 2002 |  | /S/ K. DANE BROOKSHERK.DANE BROOKSHER             
|      
|DATED: |  | January 10, 2002 |  | /S/ GARY M. CHRISTENSENGARY M. CHRISTENSEN        
|      
|DATED: |  | January 10, 2002 |  | /S/ SUSAN F. DAVISSUSAN F.DAVIS                   
|      
|DATED: |  | January 9, 2002  |  | /S. C.L. WILLIAM HAWC.L. WILLIAM HAW              
|      
|DATED: |  | January 9, 2002  |  | /S/ JOHN J. HOLLANDJOHN J. HOLLAND                
|      
|DATED: |  | January 11, 2002 |  | /S/ ROBERT J. REINTJES, SR.ROBERT J. REINTJES, SR.
|      
|DATED: |  | January 8, 2002  |  | /S/ RONALD E.RUTLEDGERONALD E.RUTLEDGE            
|      
|DATED: |  | January 10, 2002 |  | /S/ GARY L. TAPELLAGARY L. TAPELLA                
|      
|DATED: |  | January 9, 2002  |  | /S/ WILLIAM D. ZOLLARSWILLIAM D. ZOLLARS