alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
53%

20%

11%

7%

7% 2%

59%

19%

4%

1%

10%

3% 4%

 Organic Enforcement Quarterly Update

 National Organic Program (NOP) Activities | Fiscal Year 2022, First Quarter

Investigations & Inquiries by Fiscal Year

Trademark of USDA Organic Seal Creates New Enforcement Tools

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has granted the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service 

(AMS) final trademark approval for the USDA organic seal. This key milestone increases law 

enforcement authority to penalize those who attempt to misuse the organic seal.

With official Trademark protection, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Service and the 

National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center may seize and destroy shipments 

when fraudulent claims are found to have been made—significantly raising the risk and cost 

of crime. In the coming months NOP will work with our accredited certifiers and federal 

enforcement partners to begin using this new authority to better safeguard the integrity of 

the organic seal and deter fraudulent activities involving the organic seal. Watch for details 

this spring. This success is a direct outcome of the collaborative work of the Organic 

Agricultural Product Imports Interagency Working Group, established by the 2018 Farm Bill.

Learn more about the USDA National Organic Program at www.ams.usda.gov/Organic. 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Completed Investigations 127 279 260 285 390 360 470 335 413 448 342 66

Resolved Inquiries 30 197 248 386 439 62

New Investigations 183 278 215 411 548 508 395 370 374 391 390 42

Total Incoming 183 278 215 411 548 508 425 567 622 777 829 104

Percentage completed 69% 100% 121% 69% 71% 71% 118% 94% 106% 107% 94% 123%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

*

Cases in Progress are based on allegations, complaints, and surveillance, and are not in themselves proof of wrongdoing. Administrative Actions are 

warnings/notices to businesses, often uncertified, and are critical in establishing that violators are aware of the rules, to support future enforcement action.

442 Cases in Progress

As of 12/31/2021

324 Closed Cases by Outcome

12 Months ending 12/31/2021

Voluntary

Compliance

No Violation

Settlement, Civil Penalty, Appeal

Referred for Investigation

Administrative Actions

Labelling Error

Prohibited Substance 

Fraud

Prohibited Practice

Pesticide Residue

U.S. Patent and Trademark 

Office certification officially 

recognizes the USDA Organic 

Seal as a trademark.

Referred for 

Criminal Investigation

* Fiscal year 2022

numbers as of 

12/31/2021

Uncertified

Operations Making 

Organic Claims

Fraudulent Certificates
June 30, 2015

Mr. David Barajas

1503 Mclean Boulevard

Eugene, OR 97405

Dear Mr. Barajas:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 27, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0795), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Outlar, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.), rendered April 13, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/State Street Collective
Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert E. Fullam, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert E. FullamRobert E. FullamChief Financial OfficerMay 15, 2009
Board Recommendation for "Preservative Use in Vaccines"

Antimicrobials (antibiotics) are used in vaccines and semen for preservation. The level of 

antibiotics permitted in vaccines by 9CFR 114.10 is well below a therapeutic dose. They are not 

present for the purpose of treatment or growth enhancement of the livestock. Since the antibiotic 

is not present for the purpose of treatment, and they are necessarry for preservation, it would 

seem to be acceptable as a component of the vaccine or semen. The Livestock Committee of the 

NOSB recommends the following as guidance in developing an annotation for vaccines and 

semen on the National List. We do not want to add antibiotics to the List. We are looking for 

comments in preparation for a vote at the October 2001 NOSB meeting. 

The Livestock Committee recommends that vaccines and semen that have had antibiotics 

(antimicrobials) added for the sole purpose of preservation of the vaccine or semen be permitted 

in organic livestock production systems.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINLAY
ENTERPRISES,  INC.  FORM 10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                         4,183
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  38,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    317,345
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               399,964
<PP&E>                                         116,960
<DEPRECIATION>                                 44,681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 590,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          265,513
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       104
<OTHER-SE>                                     89,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   590,294
<SALES>                                        527,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               527,026
<CGS>                                          258,988
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  258,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               256,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             22,386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,453)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,277)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,176)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,176)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.69)


</TABLE>
# C_2016202EN.01016001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/160 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/160

---

Article 257

(ex Article 225a TEC)

(ex Article 225a

The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, may establish specialised courts attached to the General Court to hear and determine at first instance certain classes of action or proceeding brought in specific areas. The European Parliament and the Council shall act by means of regulations either on a proposal from the Commission after consultation of the Court of Justice or at the request of the Court of Justice after consultation of the Commission.

The regulation establishing a specialised court shall lay down the rules on the organisation of the court and the extent of the jurisdiction conferred upon it.

Decisions given by specialised courts may be subject to a right of appeal on points of law only or, when provided for in the regulation establishing the specialised court, a right of appeal also on matters of fact, before the General Court.

The members of the specialised courts shall be chosen from persons whose independence is beyond doubt and who possess the ability required for appointment to judicial office. They shall be appointed by the Council, acting unanimously.

The specialised courts shall establish their Rules of Procedure in agreement with the Court of Justice. Those Rules shall require the approval of the Council.

Unless the regulation establishing the specialised court provides otherwise, the provisions of the Treaties relating to the Court of Justice of the European Union and the provisions of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union shall apply to the specialised courts. Title I of the Statute and Article 64 thereof shall in any case apply to the specialised courts.

---
10-K
| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or                15(d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                that |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March              28, 2007  |   | s\Paul              N. Wojcik                         |
|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date                         |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer  |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Billie L. McMurty, Jr., Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that proof that a stolen credit card was valid and unexpired is a necessary element of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law former § 155.30 [4]; *see, People v Winfield,*145 AD2d 449, *lv denied*73 NY2d 1024). The court did not err in refusing to charge petit larceny as a lesser included offense because there was no reasonable view of the evidence that the items in the purse were not credit cards *(see, People v Glover,*57 NY2d 61). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.—Grand Larceny, 3rd Degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
FORM OF CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 AND 15d-14
              UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph Gutierrez, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of aeroTelesis, Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of material  fact or omit to state a material  fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's   other  certifying  officer  and  I  am  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      (a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days of the filing  date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      (c)  presented  in  this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the  registrant's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
functions):

      (a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize,  and  report  financial  data and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: July 12, 2004


/s/ Joseph Gutierrez
--------------------
Joseph Gutierrez, CFO
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART FIVE

THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

TITLE I

GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

Article 205

The Union's action on the international scene, pursuant to this Part, shall be guided by the principles, pursue the objectives and be conducted in accordance with the general provisions laid down in Chapter 1 of Title V of the Treaty on European Union.

---
Exhibit 23.2














Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm




The Board of
Directors


The Bureau of National
Affairs, Inc.:  We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-87450 and
333-140957) on Form S-8 of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. of our report
dated March 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders’ (deficit) equity and comprehensive (loss) income, and
cash flows of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. and subsidiaries ("the
Company") (before the effects of the adjustments described in Note 16 to the
consolidated financial statements), and the consolidated financial statement
schedule included as Item 15(a)(2) on the Company's Form 10-K, for the year
ended December 31, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual
report on Form 10-K of the Company.
  Our audit report on the
consolidated financial statements refers to accounting changes as a result of
the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.
  Our audit report on the
consolidated financial statements refers to the fact that we did not audit,
review, or apply any procedures to the adjustments to retrospectively apply the
change in accounting described in Note 16 to the consolidated financial
statements, and that those adjustments were audited by a successor
auditor.




/s/ KPMG
LLP


KPMG LLP




McLean,
Virginia


March 25, 2009 63
NUMBER 13-15-00113-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF L.J.C.S., MINOR CHILD

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, April Cantu, attempted to perfect an appeal from a final order signed by 

the County Court at Law No. 5, Nueces County, Texas, in cause no. 2014-FAM-60639-

5. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that there was no final, 

appealable judgment. On March 11, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of 

this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected 
2

within ten days from the date of receipt of the notice, the appeal would be dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s notice. 

The Nueces County Clerk’s Office has informed this Court that no final judgment

has been entered in this case. In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only 

have jurisdiction to review final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by 

statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to 

correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF 

JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

16th day of April, 2015.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF LAW

EXAMINERS :

:

:

:

: NO. 908

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

AND NOW , this 30 th day of March , 2022, Patrick J. Thomassey, Esquire

, Allegheny

County , is hereby appointed as a member of the Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners

for a term of three years, commencing April 1, 2022.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 5

SECTION 5

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 277

(ex Article 241 TEC)

(ex Article 241 TEC)

Notwithstanding the expiry of the period laid down in Article 263, sixth paragraph, any party may, in proceedings in which an act of general application adopted by an institution, body, office or agency of the Union is at issue, plead the grounds specified in Article 263, second paragraph, in order to invoke before the Court of Justice of the European Union the inapplicability of that act.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Periodic Report), I, James M. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ James M. JohnsonJames M. JohnsonChief Executive OfficerMay 14, 2009


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
# EUR-Lex - 12012M001 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M001

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE I: COMMON PROVISIONS - Article 1 (ex Article 1 TEU) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0016 - 0016 *

Article 1

(ex Article 1 TEU) [1]

By this Treaty, the HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES establish among themselves a EUROPEAN UNION, hereinafter called "the Union", on which the Member States confer competences to attain objectives they have in common.

This Treaty marks a new stage in the process of creating an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe, in which decisions are taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen.

The Union shall be founded on the present Treaty and on the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as "the Treaties"). Those two Treaties shall have the same legal value. The Union shall replace and succeed the European Community.

[1] These references are merely indicative. For more ample information, please refer to the tables of equivalences between the old and the new numbering of the Treaties.

--------------------------------------------------