alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BARRA, INC
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD
ENDING JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                        20041267
<SECURITIES>                                  15868819
<RECEIVABLES>                                 15065877
<ALLOWANCES>                                    137247
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              61488205
<PP&E>                                        23734761
<DEPRECIATION>                                11876801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                92977770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         37732934
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      23080889
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  52603270
<SALES>                                       27106462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              27106462
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 20558116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9914000<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (3478133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2783874
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (6262007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (6262007)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>ONE-TIME ACQUISITION CHARGES OF $9,914,000 REPRESENT PURCHASED IN-PROCESS
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITIONS OF GAT AND
INNOSEARCH ON JUNE 24, 1997.  EXCLUDING ONE-TIME ACQUISITION CHARGES, NET
INCOME PER SHARE WOULD HAVE BEEN $.39.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1     **Subsidiary** **Registered in** **Acquired**      A. M. Castle & Co. (Canada) Inc. Ontario July 31, 1990     Advanced Fabricating Technology LLC. Delaware May 1, 2000     Castle Metals de Mexico S.A. de C.V. Mexico February 27, 2004     A. M. Castle & Co. (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Singapore October 13, 2006     Keystone Tube Company Delaware June 2, 1997     Metal Express Delaware September 17, 1997     Oliver Steel Company Delaware July 15, 1998     Paramont Machine Company, LLC Delaware April 1, 1999     Total Plastics, Inc. Michigan January 2, 1996     Transtar Intermediate Holdings #2, Inc. Delaware September 5, 2006     Transtar Metals Holdings Delaware September 5, 2006     Transtar Inventory Corp. Delaware September 5, 2006     Transtar Metals Corp. Delaware September 5, 2006     Transtar Marine Corp. Delaware September 5, 2006     A.M. Castle Metal materials (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Pu Dong Province,Peoples Republic ofChina November 22, 2007
62
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING 

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND 

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE.

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT 

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S 

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT 

USDA, AMS, FVP, SCI

831 MITTEN ROAD, ROOM 200

BURLINGAME, CA 94010

PHONE: 650-552-9073

FAX: 650-552-9147

EQUIPMENT CATALOG
RHUBARB 

RHUBARB – STALKS PERMITTED IN U.S. FANCY AND U.S. NO. 1 

Rhubarb, Photo No. 1

October 1990

(Previously No. 1, no date)
# STATEOFLOUISIANA COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

CHARLOTTE BETHLYAND NICOLE DAVIS, OBO HER MINOR CHILDREN, NAKIYA DAVIS AND KHLOE DAVIS VERSUS ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, JBHUNT TRANSPORT, INC. AND DARRIS JENNINGS NO. 2021 CW 1626



### JANUARY 14, 2022

In Re: Ace American Insurance Company, J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and Darris Jennings, applying for supervisory writs, 18th Judicial District Court, Parish of Iberville, No. 80228.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ. WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. This writ is denied as to the portion of the trial court's December 1, 2021 ruling which denied defendants' neuropsychological expert the ability to conduct testing on plaintiff. This writ is granted for the limited purpose of prohibiting plaintiffs from making remarks before the jury or cross-examining defendants' neuropsychological expert or any witness as to the fact that suchexpertdidnot conduct testing on theplaintiff.

COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT JMG GH WRC
# Sheet

United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Marketing Service, Packers and Stockyards Division	Suspension List as of  03/01/2024
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Goody's Family Clothing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
R. Carlin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ Edward R. Carlin
------------------------
Edward R. Carlin
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
August 24, 2005
# NHTC Supplier List

# Instructions
# EUR-Lex - 12012M013 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M013

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE III: PROVISIONS ON THE INSTITUTIONS - Article 13 **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0022 - 0022 *

Article 13

1. The Union shall have an institutional framework which shall aim to promote its values, advance its objectives, serve its interests, those of its citizens and those of the Member States, and ensure the consistency, effectiveness and continuity of its policies and actions.

The Union's institutions shall be:

- the European Parliament,

- the European Council,

- the Council,

- the European Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission"),

- the Court of Justice of the European Union,

- the European Central Bank,

- the Court of Auditors.

2. Each institution shall act within the limits of the powers conferred on it in the Treaties, and in conformity with the procedures, conditions and objectives set out in them. The institutions shall practice mutual sincere cooperation.

3. The provisions relating to the European Central Bank and the Court of Auditors and detailed provisions on the other institutions are set out in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

4. The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall be assisted by an Economic and Social Committee and a Committee of the Regions acting in an advisory capacity.

--------------------------------------------------
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 15, 2019

NO. 03

- 17

- 00327

- CR

Timothy Anthony, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE R OSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH AFFIRMED

— OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgments revoking community supervision entered by the trial court.

Having reviewe d the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s judgments of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial

court’s judgments

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of

costs is made.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-2545

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jamane J. Smith

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: December 28, 2016

Filed: January 3, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Jamane Smith appeals from the judgment of the District Court imposing 1

sentence after he pleaded guilty to robbery and firearm charges. His counsel has

The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the

1

Western District of Missouri.
moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), arguing that the court imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence. Smith

has filed a pro se brief challenging the court’s conclusion that he was a career

offender under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 4B1.1. He has also filed a motion

requesting that his appeal be held in abeyance pending an anticipated Supreme Court

decision. 

Smith pleaded guilty after entering into a written plea agreement containing an

appeal waiver. Notwithstanding the assertions made by counsel and Smith, we

conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d

702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886,

890–92 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (discussing the enforcement of appeal waivers), cert.

denied, 540 U.S. 997 (2003); see also United States v. Lumpkins, 687 F.3d 1011,

1014–15 (8th Cir. 2012) (enforcing an appeal waiver in an analogous case), cert.

denied, 133 S. Ct. 1612 (2013).

We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), and have found no non-frivolousissuesfor appeal. We grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw, deny Smith’s motion, and dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

-2-
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Room 1406-S, STOP 0237

Washington, D.C. 20250-0235

August 24, 2016

Dear Industry Trade Partners: 

Beginning September 1, 2016, all imported commodities subject to Agricultural Marketing 

Service (AMS) Section 8e regulation must be presented for inspection to AMS or its FederalState partners as separate lots that correspond to each individual Customs Entry Number. This 

requirement aligns the practices in your port with those that have been in place at most other 

ports of entry in the United States. 

Ensuring that your business practices conform to this requirement will help AMS expedite its 

review and release of your shipments from a “Hold Intact” status to a “May Proceed” status, 

allowing product movement to market in a speedy and efficient manner. This improvement is a 

result of AMS transitioning to a new program that utilizes data generated through the U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) to monitor

compliance with the Section 8e regulations on imported agricultural commodities. Since July 

23, 2016, CBP has required all importers to submit their entry filings through the ACE as part of 

a government-wide deployment of the new International Trade Data System (ITDS). 

The ACE electronic interface is accelerating the processing of entry filings for all importers by 

automating clearance processes by all government agencies, including AMS. To accomplish 

this, CBP requires each government agency to electronically message back to ACE with the 

status of each entry filing. With ACE, importers will be able to determine the entry status under 

AMS or any other Agency’s requirements that determine release by CBP for entry into the 

United States. Presenting your products for AMS inspection segregated by Customs Entry 

Number allows AMS to notify CBP so that your products can be released into the channels of 

commerce quickly and efficiently.

Please contact your local USDA inspection office for further information about requesting an 

inspection. For questions about meeting Section 8e import regulations or the electronic filing 

process please contact our Compliance and Enforcement Branch at (888) 551-3523. You can also

learn more about the ACE and how to make it work for you by viewing a pre-recorded webinar, 

available at: www.ams.usda.gov/event/importing-fruits-vegetables-and-specialty-crops-usingace.

Sincerely,

for Michael V. Durando 

Director, Marketing Order and Agreement Division

Specialty Crops Program
EXHIBIT 21


                      SUBSIDIARIES OF PROGRESS ENERGY, INC.
                              AT DECEMBER 31, 2000


The following is a list of certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Progress
Energy, Inc. and their respective states of incorporation:

Carolina Power & Light Company                                   North Carolina
         Caronet, Inc.                                           North Carolina

Florida Progress Corporation                                     Florida
         Florida Power Corporation                               Florida
         Progress Telecommunications Corporation                 Florida
         Progress Capital Holdings, Inc.                         Florida
                  Electric Fuels Corporation                     Florida
                           MEMCO Barge Line, Inc.                Delaware
                           Progress Rail Services Corporation    Alabama

North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation                           Delaware

Progress Energy Ventures, Inc.                                   North Carolina

Strategic Resource Solutions Corp.                               North Carolina

Progress Energy Service Company, LLC                             North Carolina
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE VI

JUSTICE

JUSTICE

Article 48

Presumption of innocence and right of defence

1.   Everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.

2.   Respect for the rights of the defence of anyone who has been charged shall be guaranteed.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VII

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

CHAPTER 1

RULES ON COMPETITION

SECTION 1

SECTION 1

RULES APPLYING TO UNDERTAKINGS

Article 106

(ex Article 86 TEC)

(ex Article 86 TEC)

1.   In the case of public undertakings and undertakings to which Member States grant special or exclusive rights, Member States shall neither enact nor maintain in force any measure contrary to the rules contained in the Treaties, in particular to those rules provided for in Article 18 and Articles 101 to 109.

2.   Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or having the character of a revenue-producing monopoly shall be subject to the rules contained in the Treaties, in particular to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them. The development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Union.

3.   The Commission shall ensure the application of the provisions of this Article and shall, where necessary, address appropriate directives or decisions to Member States.

---
. April 4, 2015

Royce William Tawater

TDCj CID #1950643

Beto Unit

1391 m 3328

Tennessee Colony, TX 75880

Abel Acosta, Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals

P.O. Box 12308 - Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

RE: PD 0004-15; Royce William Tawater v. The State of Texas.

To whom it may concern;

Enclosed, please find the original copy of my Motion For Rehearing. Also,

three (3) supporting documents, marked TAB(s) "A," "B," &"C" are included in this

mailing.

Please file these with the Court and include them with the papers related

to this cause.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

FILED IN

CURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Sincerely yours, APR 17 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

//^j^^Wy^X^

Royce W. Tawater

etc. file/rt

COURT I

APR 08 2015
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS:

COMES NOW, ROYCE WILLIAM TAWATER, "Petitioner" pro se in the above-styled

and numbered cause and files this Petition For Rehearing pursuant to Rule 79.1

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and would respectfully show this Court

the following:

1. The Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana issued its Memorandum Op

inion and Judgement on December 10, 2014.

2. On December 28, 2014 Petitioner submitted his request for an extension of

time to file a Petition For Discretionary Review seeking an additional sixty,

(60, days in which to file the petition. Accompanying that request was a

motion requesting leave to file an original copy only of the petition.

3. This Court filed and granted those motions on January 7, 2015, making the dead

line to file the petition on/before March 10, 2015.

4. Collateral to that, the Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana issued

its Memorandum Opinion and Judgements on February 4, 2015 in cause numbers

06-14-00094-CR & 06-14-00095-Cr, (Trial Court Cause No(s). 29,310 & 29,311

respectively), affirming Petitioner's other two convictions held after a second

trial on the matters.

5. Subsequently, Petitioner filed his request to extend the time by 45 days and

his request to file.the original copy only of the petition. (03/01/15)

6. This Court granted those motions on March 6, 2015, extending the deadline

up to and including May 5, 2015; an additional 60 days.

7. On Monday, March 9, 2015 Petitioner placed in the Beto Unit's Indigent mail

drop-box his Petition For Discretionary Review, accompanied by his Unsworn

Declaration, a Certificate of Service, a Form 1-60 requesting the postage

be deducted from Petitioner's Inmate Trust Fund Account, along with the At

torney Generals carbon copy.

8. TAB "A", included in this document, is Petitioner's "File Copy" of that Form

1-60 asking that the postage be affixed and deducted from Petitioner's account.

This Form has all the relevant information for the Access To Courts Supervisor

to use to verify the mailing.

-1-
#### In the Matter of COLD SPRINGS BEVERAGE CO., Inc., Bankrupt; William Smith, Receiver, Appellant, J. Irving Lynch, Trustee, et al., Appellees.

No. 171.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 20, 1939.

McGowan & Stolz, of Syracuse, N. Y. (Max L. Stolz, of Syracuse, N. Y., of counsel), for receiver-appellant.

J. Irving Lynch and Harry V. Clements, both of Auburn, N. Y., trustees in bankruptcy, appellees.

Gerald Saperstein and Burke W. Drummond, both of Auburn, N. Y., for creditors, appellees.

Before SWAN, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Orders affirmed.
# C_2016202EN.01012101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/121 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/121

---

Article 166

(ex Article 150 TEC)

(ex Article 150 TEC)

1.   The Union shall implement a vocational training policy which shall support and supplement the action of the Member States, while fully respecting the responsibility of the Member States for the content and organisation of vocational training.

2.   Union action shall aim to:

| — | facilitate adaptation to industrial changes, in particular through vocational training and retraining, |
| --- | --- |

—

facilitate adaptation to industrial changes, in particular through vocational training and retraining,

| — | improve initial and continuing vocational training in order to facilitate vocational integration and reintegration into the labour market, |
| --- | --- |

—

improve initial and continuing vocational training in order to facilitate vocational integration and reintegration into the labour market,

| — | facilitate access to vocational training and encourage mobility of instructors and trainees and particularly young people, |
| --- | --- |

—

facilitate access to vocational training and encourage mobility of instructors and trainees and particularly young people,

| — | stimulate cooperation on training between educational or training establishments and firms, |
| --- | --- |

—

stimulate cooperation on training between educational or training establishments and firms,

| — | develop exchanges of information and experience on issues common to the training systems of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

—

develop exchanges of information and experience on issues common to the training systems of the Member States.

3.   The Union and the Member States shall foster cooperation with third countries and the competent international organisations in the sphere of vocational training.

4.   The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, shall adopt measures to contribute to the achievement of the objectives referred to in this Article, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States, and the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt recommendations.

---
EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Carter-Wallace, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-00499) on Form S-8 of Carter-Wallace, Inc. of our report dated May 27, 1997,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Carter-Wallace, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings and retained earnings and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1997, and related financial
statement schedule which report appears in the March 31, 1997 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Carter-Wallace, Inc.





                                          KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



New York, New York
June 16, 1997