alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### FLOMARCY COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Jose BENSAUDE and Maria Bensaude, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Nos. *29,*30, Dockets 27961, 27962.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Submitted Nov. *6,*1963.

Decided Nov. 22, 1963.

Samuel Zuckerman, New York City, for petitioners.

Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Melva M. Graney and Alee A. Pandaleon, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before WATERMAN, MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Flomarcy Company, Inc. and its controlling shareholders appeal from a decision of the Tax Court, T.C.Memo. 19G2-201, upholding the assessment of deficiencies against the petitioners for failure to report income which the company had earned but which petitioners had caused to be paid to third parties. The taxpayers introduced no evidence, and it is well settled that deficiency assessments of the Commissioner are presumptively correct. Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115, 54 S.Ct. 8, 78 L.Ed. 212 (1933); Brown v. Commissioner, 141 F.2d 307, 309 (2 Cir. 1944). The argument made on this appeal that the government should have the burden of proof because a constructive dividend is a legal fiction is without legal or logical basis. The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Morningside Heights Housing Corporation, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) et al., Respondents.

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York City Transit Authority, effective October 3, 1988, which eliminated certain speed restrictions on a certain subway line, the petitioners appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated November 13, 1989, which granted the respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition, confirmed the determination, and dismissed the proceeding on the merits.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly held that the action of the New York City Transit Authority in eliminating certain speed restrictions, which had been applicable to IRT "Number 1” trains operating between 122nd Street and 135th Street, was not one which required the preparation of an environmental impact statement *(see,*6 NYCRR 617.13 [d] [15]; *Presidents’ Council of Trade Waste Assns. v City of New York,*142 Misc 2d 135, *affd*159 AD2d 428; *Matter of McNerney v Bainbridge-Guilford Cent. School Bd. of Educ.,*155 AD2d 842, 843).

We have examined the petitioner’s remaining contentions *674and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Kunzeman and Miller, JJ., concur..
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

F.D. MITCHELL, J.A. FISCHER, J.P. LISIECKI

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

STEVEN K. MAYFIELD

LIEUTENANT (O-3), U.S. NAVY

NMCCA 201400452

GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 26 August 2014.

Military Judge: Col D.J. Daughtery, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, 3d Marine Division 

(-)(REIN), Okinawa, Japan .

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol K.T. Carlisle, 

USMC.

For Appellant: CAPT Charles Stimson, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

16 April 2015

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 16, 

2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00292-CV

CONNIE RANGE AS TRUSTEE OF THE MARTHA RANGE TRUST 

D/B/A RELIANT ENGINEERING AND MACHINE US AND SAM RANGE, 

Appellant

V.

CALVARY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-09494

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a final judgment signed March 2, 2015. On April 9, 

2015, appellant’s withdrawing counsel filed an unopposed motion to withdraw the 

notice of appeal without prejudice, which we have construed as a motion to 
2

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed without prejudice.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
Exhibit 10.18


 


Amendment
No. 1, Dated April 29, 2002


to
Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement


Dated
February 28, 2002


THIS
AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated April 29, 2002 (“Effective Date”) to Intellectual Property
Assignment Agreement (“Agreement”) dated February
28, 2002 (“Amendment”) is made and
entered into by and between Overstock.com, Inc., a Utah corporation with offices at 6322 South,
3000 East, Suite 100, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121, its subsidiaries, affiliates,
successors and assigns (“Company”)
and Douglas Greene, an individual (“Developer”).


WHEREAS, the parties desire to clarify their understanding of the
Technology and intellectual property assigned by Developer under the Agreement.


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:


1.                     Terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall
have the meaning as set forth under the Agreement.


2.                     Schedule A of the Agreement is amended to read as
follows:


“Schedule A

Technology


1. The Overstock.com web
site, any related infrastructure or system (including, but not limited to,
transaction processing systems, network infrastructure and related software or
content).


2. Application Server
Technology (AST).


Multi-platform Internet
software development facility and supporting middle level software, including,
without limitation, the following components: 
AST Development Module and AST Enablement Module.  AST enables software developers to easily
create web-enabled applications which can be hosted across numerous hardware
platforms, including Windows 2000, Windows NT, Linux, Unix, IBM AS400 and IBM
MVS.  AST supports development in C and
C++.”


3.                     Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement
remains unmodified and in full force and effect.  This Amendment and the Agreement represent the entire agreement
of the parties in respect to the subject matter of the Agreement and supersede
all prior agreements between the parties, whether oral or written, of any
nature whatsoever, with respect to the subject matter hereof.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.


 


	
  DEVELOPER

  	
  COMPANY

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Douglas Greene

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Jason Lindsey

  	
   

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
  Name:

  	
  Douglas Greene

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Jason Lindsey

  	
   

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
  Title:

  	
  CTO

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  CFO
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

F.D. MITCHELL, J.A. FISCHER, D.C. KING

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RONALD B. BURRELLMEDLEY

STAFF SERGEANT (E-6), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400421

GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 31 July 2014.

Military Judge: Col D.J. Daugherty, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, Marine Corps 

Installations Pacific, Okinawa, Japan.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol P.S. Rubin, 

USMC.

For Appellant: CAPT Jill James, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

16 April 2015

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District

1

Judge for the District of South Dakota.

___________

No. 95-3847

___________

Robert G. Knoche, *

 *

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

v. * District of South Dakota.

 *

Michael Durfee, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: June 28, 1996

 Filed: July 5, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Robert G. Knoche, a South Dakota prisoner, was convicted of forgery

and sentenced to thirteen years imprisonment. The South Dakota Supreme

Court affirmed his conviction and sentence. State v. Knoche, 515 N.W.2d

834 (S.D. 1994). After pursuing various postconviction remedies, Knoche

filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. The

district court denied the petition without an evidentiary hearing, and

1

Knoche appeals.

After careful review of the record before us and the parties' briefs

(including Knoche's pro se supplemental briefs), we conclude the district

court correctly denied Knoche's petition. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court ofAppgsis District

CATHY S, LUSK.

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

•COPY

4/14/2015

Green, Willis Henry Tr. Ct. No. 18971 PD-0395-15

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant's Pro Se motion for an extension

of time in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the

petition has been extended to June 16, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL

BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary Review must be filed with

The Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

COA Case No. 12-13-00391-CR

Tr. Ct. No. 18971

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

35.   Declaration on Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference believes that Article 194 does not affect the right of the Member States to take the necessary measures to ensure their energy supply under the conditions provided for in Article 347.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000018000
<NAME> CARTER WALLACE INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      51,661,000
<SECURITIES>                                25,826,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              140,317,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 7,306,000
<INVENTORY>                                 80,970,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           319,938,000
<PP&E>                                     300,051,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             149,828,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             693,613,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      174,223,000
<BONDS>                                     66,741,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    47,205,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 302,445,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               693,613,000
<SALES>                                    662,229,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           668,925,000
<CGS>                                      241,189,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              624,170,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,188,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,808,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             44,755,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                17,454,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         27,301,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                27,301,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59


        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 60113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24983]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7616]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Masters of Venice: Renaissance Paintings of Passion 
and Power from Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Masters of Venice: Renaissance Paintings 
of Passion and Power from Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the de Young 
Museum, San Francisco, California, from on or about October 29, 2011, 
until on or about February 26, 2012, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 21, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-24983 Filed 9-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                           BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


                                                       State in which
         Name of Subsidiary                             Incorporated
         ------------------                            --------------

    Bridgford Marketing Company                          California
    Bridgford Meat Company                               California
    Bridgford Food Processing Corporation                California
    A.S.I. Corporation                                   California
    Bridgford Distributing Company of
      Delaware (inactive)                                 Delaware
    American Ham Processors, Inc.* (inactive)             Delaware
    Bert Packing Company (inactive)                       Illinois
    Moriarty Meat Company (inactive)                      Illinois

---------------
*  No shares have been issued.
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

November 17, 2023 CR-2022-1355 Jessie James Sharp v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CC-07-938.63) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on November 17, 2023, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/State Street Collective
Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip J. Lussier, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Philip J. LussierPhilip J. LussierChief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2007
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Svend-Olav Carlsen, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of PortalPlayer, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

b) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 13, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2524-018]

                    a.                     *Date and Time of Meeting:*                     Wednesday, January 16, 2013, 2 p.m. Central Standard Time, (3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time).                

                    b.                     *Place:*                     Teleconference hosted by Grand River Dam Authority. (An RSVP is required. See paragraph f below.)                

                    c.                     *FERC Contact:*                     Stephen Bowler at (202) 505-6861 or                     *stephen.bowler@ferc.gov*; or Jeanne Edwards at (202) 502-6181 or                     *jeanne.edwards@ferc.gov*.                

                    d.                     *Purpose of Meeting:*                     As a follow-up to its study report meeting of October 11, 2012, the Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA) is holding a technical meeting to discuss the results of the Water Quality Study as they stand at the conclusion of fieldwork.                

                    e.                     *Proposed Agenda:*

(1) GRDA: Introduction

(2) Oklahoma Water Resources Control Board (OWRB): Water quality study results at the conclusion of fieldwork

(3) GRDA, OWRB, and other participants: Discussion

                    f. All local, state, and federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other interested parties are invited to participate by phone. Please email Jacklyn Jaggars by close of business on Monday, January 14, 2013, at                     *jjaggars@grda.com*                     to RSVP and to receive specific instructions on how to participate.                

Dated: January 2, 2013.

 Kimberly D. Bose,

 Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2013-00120 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P