alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered April 8, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01209-CV

E.F. JOHNSON COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee

V.

INFINITY GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY F/K/A INFINITY GEAR AND TECHNOLOGY, 

LLC, ET AL., Appellees/Cross-Appellants

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-14303-D

ORDER

We GRANT the parties’ April 6, 2015 joint motion to extend briefing schedule and order 

the parties’ reply briefs be filed no later than April 17, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1636

JAMES P. MIXON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HENRY C. MORGAN, Judge, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-300-2) Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 20, 2000 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James P. Mixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 338 (1971). 2 PER CURIAM:James P. Mixon, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Bivens * action. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mixon v. Morgan, No. CA-00-300-2 (E.D. Va. May 2, 2000). We deny Mixon’s Motion for a Fast and Speedy Trial. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John A. Tannuzzo, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), entered on or about December 17, 1990, which dismissed the writ of habeas corpus and denied bail, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and bail is set in the sum of $300,000 on condition that defendant (1) surrender his passport, (2) refrain from applying for a new passport until the termination of these *444criminal proceedings, and (3) report to the New York City Police Department, 9th Precinct, at 6:00 p.m. each day.

Defendant has been indicted for murder in the second degree by acting with depraved indifference in violation of Penal Law § 125.25 (2) and related crimes. The allegation appears to be that during a July 4, 1990 party the defendant placed M-80 explosives in a trash can along with accelerants. An explosion occurred which allegedly caused the death of a fourteen year old boy.

The relator was remanded and, subsequently, his petition for a writ of habeas corpus dismissed. Interim bail was set by this court in the sum of $300,000.

Viewing the criteria for bail given in CPL 510.30 and relator’s ties to the community, employment and minimal criminal record, we find that it was an abuse of discretion to deny bail and we grant bail as indicated above. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Smith, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 61 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 61

 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the 
  Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
       Northern Ireland of certain defense articles and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2019

Mr. Cicilline (for himself, Mr. Ted Lieu of California, Ms. Spanberger, 
Mr. Malinowski, Mr. Engel, Mr. Bera, Ms. Omar, Mr. Allred, Mr. Deutch, 
   Mr. Keating, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Castro of Texas, and Mr. Sherman) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the 
  Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
       Northern Ireland of certain defense articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of an export 
license with respect to the following proposed exports to the Kingdom 
of Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern 
Ireland is prohibited:
            (1) The transfer of the following defense articles, 
        including services and technical data, described in license 
        document DDTC-17-112 as designated by the Department of State 
        pursuant to the Arms Export Control Act: The proposed transfer 
        of defense articles, defense services, and technical data to 
        support the manufacture of the Aurora Fuzing System for the 
        Paveway IV Precision Guided Bomb Program.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2970

___________________________

Stacy S. Abram, IV

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Mike Allen, Sheriff, Crittenden County Arkansas; State of Arkansas; Wendy

Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction 1

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro

____________

 Submitted: April 1, 2015

Filed: April 14, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Wendy Kelley has been appointed to serve as Director of the Arkansas

1

Department of Correction, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of

Appellate Procedure 43(c).
Stacy Abram appeals after the district court denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

2

petition as untimely. The district court granted a certificate of appealability (COA)

asto whether a possible jurisdictional problem with the judgment of conviction in the

state trial court affected the timeliness analysis. After careful de novo review, we

conclude that the district court’s dismissal was proper. See 28 U.S.C. §

2244(d)(1)(A) (habeas application challenging state court judgment must be filed

within 1 year of the date on which conviction became final); Holland v. Florida, 560

U.S. 631, 649-52 (2010) (§ 2254 petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling when he

establishes he diligently pursued his rights and some extraordinary circumstance

stood in his way of filing a timely petition); Camacho v. Hobbs, 774 F.3d 931, 932

(8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review); Johnson v. Hobbs, 678 F.3d 607, 610-11 (8th

Cir. 2012) (extraordinary circumstance must be external and not attributable to

petitioner); cf. Barreto-Barreto v. United States, 551 F.3d 95, 100 (1st Cir. 2008)

(§ 2255 motion claiming trial court lacked jurisdiction must be filed within limitation

period).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern 2

District of Arkansas.

-2-
#### Candida Victorio, as Administratrix of the Estate of Sylvio Victorio, Deceased, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.), entered May 9, 1990, which, *inter alia,*dismissed the complaint as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s decedent, a national of the Dominican Republic, was diagnosed in that country as being afflicted with colon cancer in October, 1985. Subsequent testing performed at defendant Lincoln Hospital, which continued until 1987, allegedly failed to detect any cancer, despite decedent’s deteriorating physical condition. On July 16, 1987, the decedent was *368admitted to Lincoln Hospital, where he was promptly diagnosed as afflicted with cancer. Decedent died August 16, 1987. Plaintiff was issued letters of administration on July 12, 1989.

In August, 1989, plaintiff commenced this action for wrongful death, medical malpractice, lack of informed consent, and loss of consortium. The IAS court held, *inter alia,*that the wrongful death action was untimely. We agree. McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 7401 (2) (New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation Act [L 1969, ch 1016, § 1] § 20 [2]) as it was then written, required that a claim for wrongful death be commenced within one year and ninety days after the decedent’s death *(Brennan v City of New York,*59 NY2d 791). No argument is raised that any of plaintiff’s remaining causes of action may properly be maintained. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VIII

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

CHAPTER 2

MONETARY POLICY

Article 132

(ex Article 110 TEC)

(ex Article 110 TEC)

1.   In order to carry out the tasks entrusted to the ESCB, the European Central Bank shall, in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties and under the conditions laid down in the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB:

| — | make regulations to the extent necessary to implement the tasks defined in Article 3.1, first indent, Articles 19.1, 22 and 25.2 of the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB in cases which shall be laid down in the acts of the Council referred to in Article 129(4), |
| --- | --- |

—

make regulations to the extent necessary to implement the tasks defined in Article 3.1, first indent, Articles 19.1, 22 and 25.2 of the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB in cases which shall be laid down in the acts of the Council referred to in Article 129(4),

| — | take decisions necessary for carrying out the tasks entrusted to the ESCB under the Treaties and the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB, |
| --- | --- |

—

take decisions necessary for carrying out the tasks entrusted to the ESCB under the Treaties and the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB,

| — | make recommendations and deliver opinions. |
| --- | --- |

—

make recommendations and deliver opinions.

2.   The European Central Bank may decide to publish its decisions, recommendations and opinions.

3.   Within the limits and under the conditions adopted by the Council under the procedure laid down in Article 129(4), the European Central Bank shall be entitled to impose fines or periodic penalty payments on undertakings for failure to comply with obligations under its regulations and decisions.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Ignis Petroleum Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Geoff Long, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

| Date:  | April 30, 2008 | /s/ Geoff Long          |   |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |           | Geoff Long              |   |
|   |           | Chief Financial Officer |   |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

SCOTT KERNS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 46 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
#### Michael Wayne GREEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-75-249.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 2, 1976.

ORDER MODIFYING JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE

WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States, in *Green v. Oklahoma,*- U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3216, 49 L.Ed.2d -, has vacated the opinion of this Court affirming the judgment and sentence rendered in the above styled and numbered cause insofar as it left undisturbed the death sentence, and remanded this cause for reconsideration of this Court in the light of *Woodson et al. v. North*Carolina, -U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2978, 49 L.Ed.2d - (1976) and *Roberts v. Louisiana,*- U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3001, 49 L.Ed.2d - (1976);

AND WHEREAS, this Court has this date, in *Riggs v. Branch,*Okl.Cr., 554 P.2d 823, reconsidered its prior holding in *Green v. State,*Okl.Cr., 542 P.2d 551, and vacated and set aside that opinion insofar as it is inconsistent with *Riggs v. Branch,*supra.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THE ORDER OF THIS COURT, that the judgment and sentence rendered in the District Court, Oklahoma County, Case No. CRF-74-1352, be, and the same is hereby, modified from a sentence of death, to a sentence of life imprisonment at hard labor. The Clerk of this Court is directed to issue the Mandate FORTHWITH.

WITNESS OUR HANDS, and the Seal of this Court, this 2nd day of September, 1976.

TOM BRETT, P. J.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, J.

C. F. BLISS, Jr., J.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lubys, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 25, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Christopher J. Pappas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 8, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    CHRISTOPHER J. PAPPAS         
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Christopher J. Pappas                
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE>
                                                             Exhibit 12.1



                             Boston Edison Company
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                         Year ended December 31, 1996
                                (in thousands)


<S>                                                    <C>
Net income from continuing operations                  $141,546

Income taxes                                             87,982

Fixed charges                                           120,359
                                                       --------

     Total                                             $349,887
                                                       ========

Interest expense                                       $109,374
Interest component of rentals                            10,985
                                                       --------

     Total                                             $120,359
                                                       ========


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                         2.91
                                                           ====

</TABLE>
j^^W^^^ TJ,e ^

„f^ m13 2°15

T* ^Wi 0/ At<w a^, /- AbelAcosta,Clerk

*< tt«f A. . ^^^ ^^jf^5^ •C^Ct^ Is m172m
ELECTRONIC RECORD

if?**

02-14-00068-CR AGGRAVATED ROBBERY

02-14-00069-CR AGGRAVATED ASSAULT

COA # 02-14-00070-CR OFFENSE: ATT. AGG. KIDNAPPING

STYLE: jones, rory COUNTY: Denton

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 211th District Court

DATE: 11/20/14

F-2014-0079-C, F-2014-0080-C & FPublish:NO TC CASE #: 2014-0081-C

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS +—m *m*

STYLE: JONES, RORY v.

PKo se Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: 3-lHlZOtS

JUDGE: "TAA. Ux/Lt^y—,

CCA#: hjwh

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

PRO SE MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS cAntzd

JUDGE: F^ /)/>- '?)/r -zo/f

ELECTRONIC RECORD
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS ° P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

4/16/2015 Bgl \/CVi 25H COA No. 02-14-00070-CR

JONES, RORY Tr. eferN6t[E?2014-008?l-C PD-1678-14

Pursuant to Rule 69.4(a) T.R.A.P^tne>ecofd]js<Teturned to the court of appeals. ^^^•^ Abel Acosta, Clerk

2ND COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

DEBRASPISAK

401 W. BELKNAP, STE 9000

FORT WORTH, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
April 29, 2002

Board of Directors
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
231 Washington Street
Newark, NJ 07102

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Statement of Additional Information filed as part of
Post-Effective Amendment No. 28 to the registration statement on Form N-4 for
The Prudential Individual Variable Contract Account (File No.2-80897). In giving
this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose
consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.


                                         Very truly yours,

                                         SHEA & GARDNER

                                         By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER E. PALMER
                                         --------------------------
                                         Christopher E. Palmer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

CORNWALL MOUNTAIN INVESTMENTS, 

L.P., AND RANGE RESOURCES -

APPALACHIA, LLC

v.

THOMAS E. PROCTOR HEIRS TRUST, 

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION, PENNLYCO, LTD., 

VIRGINIA ENERGY CONSULTANTS, 

LLC, ATLANTIC HYDROCARBON, LLC, 

CHIEF EXPLORATION AND 

DEVELOPMENT, LLC, QUEST EASTERN 

RESOURCE, LLC, EXCO HOLDING (PA), 

INC., AND MARGARET O.F. PROCTOR 

TRUST 

PETITION OF: THOMAS E. PROCTOR 

HEIRS TRUST

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 269 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED. 

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY 

PRODUCTION COMPANY
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7550

ANTHONY JOSEPH TURNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

K. L. OSBORNE, Warden; DOCTOR ANGLIKER; DOCTOR

RAYNAUD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-95-1106-7)

Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 22, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Joseph Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jim Harold Guynn,

Jr., GUYNN & DILLON, Roanoke, Virginia; Larry Benson Kirksey,

Bristol, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Joseph Turner appeals the district court’s order

denying his requests to restructure the court-arranged disbursement

schedule of his settlement award. Our review of the record and the

district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v.

Osborne, No. CA-95-1106-7 (W.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2000). We deny

Turner’s motions for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation: Intel Date Staff Contact Information 

(Name, email, phone #) 

Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., 

applicability, reporting requirements, etc.)

WrittComProvDid tsubmDock

April 27, 2010 Chandler, AZ 

Kirsten Cappel (202) 343-9556 cappel.kirsten@epa.gov 

Tim Higgs, Intel tim.g.higgs@intel.com Sean Aldrich, Intel

Intel provided general information on their manufacturing operations. Intel identified questions and concerns with the proposed rule, Electronics Manufacturing, subpart I (see Intel public comments in the docket). Meeting included a tour of the facility. 

Intel publcomdock
#### In the Matter of Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc., et al., Appellants, v County of Onondaga et al., Respondents.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Stone, J. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. —Article 78.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00555

- CV

DENVER ENERGY EXPLORATION, LLC

, Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL SERVICES , Inc.,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 380,714

Honorable Irene Rios, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of

this appeal are taxed against Appellant.

SIGNED January 8, 2014.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice