alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Salvatore D’Auria, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/AAmendment No.1 of Tut Systems, Inc.;

 

2.                                    Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:  September 2, 2004 |     |     |                                                                                          |
|--------------------------|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |     |     |                                                                                          |
| * *                 | *By:*    | * * | */s/ Salvatore D’Auria*                                                                  |
| * *                 | * * | * * | *Salvatore D’Auria,*                                                                     |
| * *                 | * * | * * | *President, Chief Executive Officer and  Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)* |
| * *                 | * * | * * | * *                                                                                      |
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ANTHONY W. DEDRICK,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2014-7082

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 13-1166, Judge William A. Moorman.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

KENNETH M. CARPENTER, Law Offices of Carpenter 

Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant. 

Also represented by VIRGINIA A. GIRARD-BRADY, JAMIE 

MARIE ATWOOD, ABS Legal Advocates, P.A., Lawrence, 

KS. 

JANE C. DEMPSEY, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also 
 

represented by JOYCE R. BRANDA, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, 

JR., MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR.; Y. KEN LEE, CHRISTINA LYNN 

GREGG, BRIAN D. GRIFFIN, Office of General Counsel, 

United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and O’MALLEY,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/State Street Collective
Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Monet T. Ewing, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Monet T. EwingMonet T. EwingChief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                           417,582
<SECURITIES>                     249,482              <F1> 
<RECEIVABLES>                    496,557
<ALLOWANCES>                     0
<INVENTORY>                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 0
<PP&E>                           13,451,630            <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                   1,275,228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   13,515,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            213,596
<BONDS>                          687,477               <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<COMMON>                         12,614,113            <F4>
<OTHER-SE>                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     13,515,186
<SALES>                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 792,647               <F5>
<CGS>                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    365,135               <F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 20,883                <F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              0
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     406,629
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0
<FN>
<F1>   "SECURITIES" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE
<F2>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
             BUILDING]
<F3>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MINORITY INTEREST IN JOINT VENTURE
<F4>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F5>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
          INCOME
<F6>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES
<F7>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS MINORITY AND EQUITY INTEREST
             IN JOINT VENTURES' NET INCOME
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Sun  Network  Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Craig
A.  Waltzer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  my  knowledge:

(1)     The  report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



September  12,  2005          By:     /s/  Craig  A.  Waltzer
                                      -----------------------
                                      Craig  A.  Waltzer
                                      Chief  Executive  Officer,  President  and
                                      Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000015511
<NAME> THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      619<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                        57<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,127<F1>
<PP&E>                                          23,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,129<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,029<F1>
<BONDS>                                          4,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,129<F1>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,366
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,490
<INCOME-TAX>                                       561
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                929
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       929
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>RESTATEMENT REFLECTED HEREIN IS THE RESULT OF RECLASSIFICATIONS TO PRIOR
PERIODS' FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO CONFORM TO THE CURRENT PERIOD PRESENTATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      23.1**





Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
      S-8 No. 333-20169) pertaining to the Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. 1993 Stock Option
      Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-29940) pertaining to the
      Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan, and the Registration Statement
      (Form S-8 No. 333-130832) of Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. pertaining to the Cal-Maine
      Foods, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan and to the Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. Stock
      Appreciation Rights Plan of our reports dated July 31, 2008, with respect to
      the
      consolidated financial statements and schedule of Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and
      Subsidiaries, Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries and the effectiveness
      of
      internal control over financial reporting of Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and
      Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended May
      31, 2008.





/s/
      Moore
      Stephens Frost





Little
      Rock, Arkansas


August
      4,
      2008
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

EX PARTE §

§

§ NO. WR-83,100-01

§ WR-83,100-02

LUIS ANGEL MONDRAGON § WR-83,100-03

APPLICANT’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND DISMISS

APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT

TO ART. 11.07, TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

NOW COMES the Applicant, LUIS ANGEL MONDRAGON, and files this Motion

to Withdraw and Dismiss Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to Art. 11.07, Tex

Code Crim. Proc., and would show the following:

I.

Applicant hereby moves to withdraw and dismiss his Application for Writ of Habeas

Corpus.

II.

Applicant filed a motion in the trial court prior to his writ application being forwarded

to this Court asking that his Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed. That

motion was granted on March 30, 2015. A copy of the order of the trial court is attached as

Exhibit A.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Applicant prays that this motion be

granted.

Applicant’s Motion to Withdraw and Dismiss Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to Art. 11.07, Tex. Code Crim. Proc. - Page 1

WR-83,100-01

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/13/2015 9:31:23 AM

Accepted 4/13/2015 9:55:49 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Robert N. Udashen 

ROBERT N. UDASHEN, P.C.

Bar Card No. 20369600

SORRELS, UDASHEN & ANTON

2311 Cedar Springs Road

Suite 250

Dallas, Texas 75201

214-468-8100

214-468-8104 (fax)

Attorney for Applicant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On this 13th day of April, 2015, a true and correct copy of Applicant’s Motion to

Withdraw Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to Art. 11.07, Tex. Code Crim.

Proc. was delivered to the Dallas CountyDistrict Attorney’s Office, Appellate Section, Frank

Crowley Courts Building, 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., L.B. 19, Dallas, Texas 75207.

 /s/ Robert N. Udashen 

ROBERT N. UDASHEN, P.C.

Applicant’s Motion to Withdraw and Dismiss Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to Art. 11.07, Tex. Code Crim. Proc. - Page 2
WRIT NOS. W01-59633-L(A), W01-49257-L(A), W03-49258-L(A) 

INDICTMENT NOS. FOi-59633-L, F03-49257-L, F03-49258-L 

STATE OF TEXAS 

vs. 

LUIS ANGEL MONDRAGON 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT 

COURT NUMBER FIVE 

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 

ORDER 

On this day came on to be considered the motion of Luis Angel Mondragon to 

withdraw and dismiss his application for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court, after 

considering same, is of the opinion said motion should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE 

ORDERED that the applications for writs of habeas corpus filed by Luis Angel Mondragon 

in cause numbers W01-59633-L(A), W01-49257-L(A), and W03-49258-L(A) are hereby 

DISMISSED. ) 

SIGNED this 0 dayof ___ ~Y\-~#_"_.....-_- __ ~ ______ , 2015. 

c 

JUDGE PRESIDING 

EXHIBIT 

Applicant's Order to Withdraw and Dismiss Applications for Writs of Habeas Corpus - Page 1 14
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 4

SECTION 4

THE COMMISSION

Article 248

(ex Article 217(2) TEC)

(ex Article 217(2) TEC)

Without prejudice to Article 18(4) of the Treaty on European Union, the responsibilities incumbent upon the Commission shall be structured and allocated among its members by its President, in accordance with Article 17(6) of that Treaty. The President may reshuffle the allocation of those responsibilities during the Commission's term of office. The Members of the Commission shall carry out the duties devolved upon them by the President under his authority.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINLAY
ENTERPRISES,  INC.  FORM 10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         3,434
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  36,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    325,756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               405,372
<PP&E>                                         106,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                 36,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 592,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          283,157
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       104
<OTHER-SE>                                     74,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   592,165
<SALES>                                        504,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               504,252
<CGS>                                          246,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  246,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               247,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             25,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,697)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,927)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,770)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                7,415
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,185)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.69)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              The Schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from the financial
                              statements for American Mortgage Investors Trust
                              and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
                              such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000878774
<NAME>                        American Mortgage Investors Trust
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,423,043
<SECURITIES>                                11,602,252
<RECEIVABLES>                               47,242,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,279,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,375,049
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,904,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,279,354
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,103,507
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               143,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                960,107
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   960,107
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE II

FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

Article 29

(ex Article 24 TEC)

(ex Article 24 TEC)

Products coming from a third country shall be considered to be in free circulation in a Member State if the import formalities have been complied with and any customs duties or charges having equivalent effect which are payable have been levied in that Member State, and if they have not benefited from a total or partial drawback of such duties or charges.

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-81,764-01

Ex parte YUSULF SHAHEED BENSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 65676-A, IN THE 149 DISTRICT COURT

TH

BRAZORIA COUNTY

MEYERS, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which JOHNSON and ALCALA,

JJ., join.

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N

The majority holds that when a felony DWI and an intoxication assault offense arise

out of the same transaction, the two crimes are not the same offense for double-jeopardy

purposes. However, I disagree with the court’s analysis and conclusion.

As the majority discusses, we have determined that prior intoxication-related

convictions are elements of felony DWI. Gibson v. State, 995 S.W.2d 693, 696 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1999). However, the prior convictions are only jurisdictional elements that, once pled

in the indictment, confer jurisdiction to the district court. Martin v. State, 200 S.W.3d 635,
Benson dissent - Page 2

640 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Jurisdictional elements are not traditional elements and should

not be treated as such. For example, in felony DWI cases where defendants agree to stipulate

to their two prior convictions, the State is prohibited from presenting any further evidence

of the convictions during its case-in-chief in order to prevent unfair prejudice. Tamez v. State,

11 S.W.3d 198, 202 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Hernandez v. State, 109 S.W.3d 491, 495 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2003). This same procedure does not apply when a defendant admits to a

traditional element of the offense they are charged with and this clearly illustrates how

jurisdictional elements are distinguishable. While this difference does not mean the offenses

are the same under the Blockburger test, I do believe that it goes to rebutting the presumption

that the offenses are different for double-jeopardy purposes.

Further rebutting that presumption is the fact that misdemeanor DWI and intoxication

assault would be presumed to be jeopardy barred under Blockburger because there are no

jurisdictional priors to act as differing elements. See TEX. PENAL CODE §§ 49.04, 49.07.

There exists no clearly expressed legislative intent to impose multiple punishments for a

misdemeanor DWI and intoxication assault that arise from the same transaction, and it does

not logically follow that such an intent suddenly appears when it is a felony DWI rather than

a misdemeanor.

For the foregoing reasons, I believe that, although the offenses may have different

elements under the Blockburger test, prosecuting an individual for a felony DWI and an

intoxication assault that arose from the same transaction is unconstitutional and should be
Benson dissent - Page 3

barred by double jeopardy. I would grant Appellant relief and, therefore, I respectfully

dissent.

Meyers, J.

Filed: April 15, 2015

Publish
RO 11278 9443.1987(17)

AUG 18 1987

Mr. Kevin T. Rookstool Mineral By-Products, Inc.

240 West Elmwood Drive

Suite 2011 Dayton, OH 45459

Dear Mr. Rookstool:

This is in response to your letter of May 20, 1987, in which you asked whether the characteristic of corrosivity, as discussed in 40 CFR 261.22, applies only to those wastes which are aqueous and or liquid. Section 261.22 presently applies only to aqueous and liquid wastes, unless and until EPA promulgates a definition of corrosivity for solids. The Agency has no plans to do this at the present time.

Sincerely,

Original Document signed

Matthew A. Straus, Chief

Waste Characterization Branch

cc: David Friedman

Filomena Chau