alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yang Holding Company ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I. James
Chow, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and


         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all Material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operation of the Company.




/s/ James Chow
-------------------------------
James Chow
President, Treasurer and
Secretary. Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer.

August 5, 2003
**EXHIBIT 12**

**CASCADENATURAL GAS CORPORATION**

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGESAND PREFERRED DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS**

| ** **                            | ** ** | **Twelve Months Ended**    | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                            | ** ** | **30-Sep-06**                        | ** ** | **30-Sep-05** | ** ** | **30-Sep-04** | ** ** | **30-Sep-03** | ** ** | **30-Sep-02** | ** ** |
| ** **                            | ** ** | **(dollars in thousands)** | ** ** |
| Fixed charges, as defined:            |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                      |       |                                 | $          | 11,951 |   |   |   | $ | 11,744 |   |   |   | $ | 12,375 |   |   |   | $ | 12,363 |   |   |   | $ | 12,384 |   |   |
| Amortization of debt issuance expense |       |                                 | 396        |   |   |   | 372 |   |   |   | 618 |   |   |   | 696 |   |   |   | 652 |   |   |
| Total fixed charges                   |       |                                 | $          | 12,347 |   |   |   | $ | 12,116 |   |   |   | $ | 12,993 |   |   |   | $ | 13,059 |   |   |   | $ | 13,036 |   |   |
| Earnings, as  defined:                |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                            |       |                                 | $          | 12,489 |   |   |   | $ | 9,247 |   |   |   | $ | 13,302 |   |   |   | $ | 8,720 |   |   |   | $ | 10,458 |   |   |
| Add (deduct):                         |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income taxes                          |       |                                 | 8,755      |   |   |   | 5,632 |   |   |   | 7,559 |   |   |   | 5,117 |   |   |   | 6,085 |   |   |
| Fixed charges                         |       |                                 | 12,347     |   |   |   | 12,116 |   |   |   | 12,993 |   |   |   | 13,059 |   |   |   | 13,036 |   |   |
| Total earnings                        |       |                                 | $          | 33,591 |   |   |   | $ | 26,995 |   |   |   | $ | 33,854 |   |   |   | $ | 26,896 |   |   |   | $ | 29,579 |   |   |
| Ratio of earnings to  fixed charges   |       |                                 | 2.72       |   |   |   | 2.23 |   |   |   | 2.61 |   |   |   | 2.06 |   |   |   | 2.27 |   |   |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

E X PARTE: ADAM PORRAS § § § § § No. 08

- 22

- 00 115

- C R Appeal from the
106 th Judicial D istrict Court

o f Gaines County, Texas (TC# 22

- 5803 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal of the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus seeking a bond reduction. We dismiss this appeal as moot

. 1 Appellant failed to timely file an Appellant’s Brief or a motion for extension of time to file

same

. Accordingly, o n August 31, 2022, we issued a letter to Appellant directing him to file an
extension motion and his brief within ten days

. When Appellant failed to do so, we abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether Appellant wished to pursue the appeal and whether he had been deprived of effective assistance of counsel.
Th e trial court conducted the hearing and entered findings , concluding that , fol lowing a bargained

1 This case was transferred from our sister court in Eas tland (11th District) pursuant to the Texas Supreme Court’s docket equalization efforts. See T EX .G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. section 73.001. We follow the precedent of the Eastland Court of Appeals to the extent they might conflict with our own. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 41.3.2 for guilty plea

— wherein Appellant pleaded guilty to lesser

- included offenses of two of the charged counts in exchange for dismissal of all remaining counts

— Appellant no longer desired to pursue this appeal . The trial court also found Appellant had not been deprived of effective assistance of
counsel. Where appellant has been convicted of the underlying offenses, or the offenses have been dismissed, his appeal from the pretrial habeas application for a reduction of bon d becomes moot.
See Saucedo v. State , 795 S.W.2d 8, 9 (Tex.App

— Houston [ 14th Dist.] 1990, no pet.)(finding issues regarding appellant’s pretrial restraint rendered moot by entry of his guilty plea to the underlying criminal offense because he is now confin ed based on judgment and sentence, not on the complained

- of process underlying his original detention ) ; State v. Golding , 398 S.W.3d 745, 747 (Tex.App.

— Hou s ton [1st Dist.] 2011, pet. ref’d)( legal issues raised in habeas application are
rendered moot where the premise of habeas application is “destroyed by subsequent developments”); Duggan v. State , No. 01

- 90

- 00379

- CR , 1991 WL 67006, at *1 (Tex.App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] May 2, 1991, no pet.) ( per curiam) (not designated for publication) (dismissing

as moot pretrial habeas writ seeking bond reduction where appellant pleaded guilty to the underlying offenses). We adopt the trial court’s findings and dismiss this appeal as moot

.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ , Chief Jus tice October 26, 2022
Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9498]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Advisory Committee on Prosthetics and Special-Disabilities 
Programs, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Federal Advisory Committee on Prosthetics and Special-Disabilities 
Programs will be held on May 8-9, 2012, in room 230 at the Department 
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The 
meeting will convene at 8:30 a.m. on both days, and will adjourn at 
4:30 p.m. on May 8 and at 12 noon on May 9. The meeting is open to the 
public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on VA's prosthetics programs designed to provide state-of-the-
art prosthetics and the associated rehabilitation research, 
development, and evaluation of such technology. The Committee also 
provides advice to the Secretary on special disabilities programs, 
which are defined as any program administered by the Secretary to serve 
Veterans with spinal cord injuries, blindness or visual impairments, 
loss of extremities or loss of function, deafness or hearing 
impairment, and other serious incapacities in terms of daily life 
functions.
    On May 8, the Committee will be briefed by the Chief Research and 
Development Officer; Director of Audiology and Speech Pathology; 
Director of National Veterans Sports Programs and Special Events; Chief 
Procurement and Logistics Officer; and Director of Blind Rehabilitation 
Services. On May 9, the Committee will be briefed by the Chief 
Consultant for Telehealth Services.
    No time will be allocated for receiving oral presentations from the 
public. However, members of the public may direct questions or submit 
written statements for review by the Committee in advance of the 
meeting to Mr. Larry N. Long, Designated Federal Officer, Veterans 
Health Administration, Patient Care Services, Rehabilitation Services 
(10P4RD), VA, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20420, or by 
email at [email protected]. Any member of the public wishing to attend the 
meeting should contact Mr. Long at (202) 461-7354.

    By Direction of the Secretary.

    Dated: April 16, 2012.
Vivian Drake,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-9498 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This amendment made as of November 14, 2001 between FOOT LOCKER, INC.
(formerly known as Venator Group, Inc.), a New York corporation (the "Company"),
and MATTHEW D. SERRA (the "Executive").

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to an Employment
Agreement dated February 12, 2001 (the "Employment Agreement") pursuant to which
the Executive serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company;
and

         WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement as
provided herein.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:

         1. Section 5(c)(ii) of the Employment Agreement is amended by deleting
the first sentence of such section and substituting in lieu thereof the
following:

                  (ii) On the earlier to occur of (A) March 4, 2003 and (B) the
         date thirty (30) days following the day on which J. Carter Bacot
         ceases, for any reason, to serve as Chairman of the Board of the
         Company, if Executive has not been elected Chairman of the Board of the
         Company (in addition to continuing in his position as Chief Executive
         Officer), Executive may, during the 30-day period commencing on such
         date, give written notice to the Company of his election to resign his
         position as President and Chief Executive Officer and terminate this
         agreement.

         2. Capitalized terms used herein that are defined in the Employment
Agreement shall have the meanings provided for in the Employment Agreement,
unless otherwise defined herein.

         3. All provisions of the Employment Agreement not expressly amended
hereby shall remain unmodified and unamended hereby and the entire Employment
Agreement, as amended hereby, shall continue in full force and effect in
accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this
Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

                                                    FOOT LOCKER, INC.

                                                    By:/s/ Laurie Petrucci
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Senior Vice President-
                                                       Human Resources

                                                       /s/ Matthew D. Serra
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Matthew D. Serra
# C_2016202EN.01005401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/54

---

Article 14

(ex Article 16 TEC)

(ex Article 16 TEC)

Without prejudice to Article 4 of the Treaty on European Union or to Articles 93, 106 and 107 of this Treaty, and given the place occupied by services of general economic interest in the shared values of the Union as well as their role in promoting social and territorial cohesion, the Union and the Member States, each within their respective powers and within the scope of application of the Treaties, shall take care that such services operate on the basis of principles and conditions, particularly economic and financial conditions, which enable them to fulfil their missions. The European Parliament and the Council, acting by means of regulations in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish these principles and set these conditions without prejudice to the competence of Member States, in compliance with the Treaties, to provide, to commission and to fund such services.

---
<PAGE>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT                                       EXHIBIT  23


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-71286, No. 33-51377, No.33-38501, and No. 33-29801 on Forms S-3, and No.
33-61035 and No. 33-39873 on Form S-8 of Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, of our
reports dated November 6, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Cascade Natural Gas Corporation for the year ended September 30, 1998.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Seattle, Washington
December 24, 1998
# C_2016202EN.01009301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/93

---

Article 111

(ex Article 91 TEC)

(ex Article 91 TEC)

Where products are exported to the territory of any Member State, any repayment of internal taxation shall not exceed the internal taxation imposed on them whether directly or indirectly.

---
I. 

{)u 4=· 1 · i~ A/NJ/,·cAJr 1\t:e_;e:L-tsd ~ tu0-1--tt!__s of P.t\J ~fAdAvl~ 

.Ctle:d b~ h,~ ol\L9;AJA-I ~AJeY. ou 3· "''s: Ths Mh c.fr'Jn/,-f IIJPO 

?,Jed 'AJ +hs Z-&3 to 1t.s~.c.J Lou!\+- tJ Tt::;){n-.s /-/n,;._i\ u LhUtJf'l>. 

1\.ll ol +he: A-PPlrc..rKJh f~VIOU:::. (Jrr{Jcf.... woAk.. hAS ~V.J fllt::.--e.f IV 

-1-f)e l)'ltb ~.S~1U trut-..t- oP 1-1-tt-MIS. t~ T~w.s. 

--rr. ANJI1UA1U~ ~ ...PhA-+ luO DN:.ft::Jt of- ~A1JJkk tuftS~ 

uu be:h"'IPD~ .:SA-aLL erutf-sA-baue. A6110"-tl.ug to lrw -1-he.. _Ld,~( 

~~~~L+ 1\CJ- of IC,~Q .Pl\ouidd lo~ +he -1-AJtt<Jslx... 61- f'/He:S A.vrJ 

c:xc__fl ruSE of b:::.~ be~o ../-h,;z. d ts- k 'L.t tn:.J A. -1--.£. bl- V M-..1 ous 

toc.A.rl-ll:S. s~ .. '~ou i4.3Cl3 .. of --tl-1~ v. 7. L. ~- Govt:JJJ lf?t::.V-1- Cocf6. 

fhb:.J\f. ftf...f:_ ..St::Pb(A-ft; dtS-\-k.1U ~.OJf..,f.s.,. 1d~~~W !J~ ~/)6-kfl-k NU~t:d.SJ 

:5UGh h PrtJI f\1!1 I k C)UJA) ~Udjf:, Mvd ?t'J() 11. A-Oh l(e.J "Jcii-.,f;cf 1L~DJJ;~ _!_A) .AWin~~ nP ~e"fr'S! +k 3~..11.A..Ohtc..A-I .Jui-..:!d,e.J,ou of,4-u..o{z) ot. tnd6 

dD~td CCD\ts 15 oua /r:t(J(J;f\J!3 1U .J:>mc ~u.J-,e:S, Eveu tr.S S/Jec..,fu££ 
!Jy ~h~ :-1-he:. ca+h ~ud rni=JJ\.s fa -l--hr: Uu1 t-ezj .5~4-e-:J Gu.s-1-J·~tJ-I;oJ +h~ Att.o~d t.s. e:u.-t.+lcd -k -k.,ll-1 t.u1--t-h •'w --ihe dt.s+K-·iU -1-hs CL;/hG LuM 

f.\.,llt:.SeLi -l-6 hl'rl.£., !Jt:::B.J to-inmd-1-ed ~ iUh,Lf. tit:JkteJ- .sht:J II hm..e bee« 

fl\t).JJ'aJS{ Y 1\-Std'k..~ti\J IJy fi\VJ. A. fc9~fnl'r'i 07-clbh. I.S IJezd~d fu II t/ec_+ +'h2. 

-k-_AAD~ aJ C!r313S trc;-lwt::EU -1-wb (L) dt.S.kiL-1 [6cA~5 IAJ &;u.u-/,as w1./A 

1-wo 09.... nfb~~ d,sk ,cJ- (AJLA.:is_, ho~evc:;,;... IUD ;sud ~'t. t.S ;u~-d 4,( 

t:JcUJANjG oE ~udle:s . k .. A..b~v-k>u 11.54-A--£, q1~ ).w. uJ z.s (_J~. A/f. 14-ih 

d JS+ 1'1Cf~ ). lhJ I~ {J,e ~ oil Au-1-lwx_Jfl( o1 1r CaJt,-/- .la !4LGiol...m A 

Cou-lc m.fJ I M-at ~ t2..A~ .!Jb ~ 'o\J -IJJ,; &u.S-\-' M ou o 1- -1--t, ~~ S-M-It;") . 

o 1\ +he f~otus. du A-Lkr.l +hut_/Z, uudtd.,. +/, w+ mu(..t~ ;s wJA 6 c.rl- suiJ~ 

M~.Ju"'sd,dtw . .h .. d-A-1+, z_ 1/ . .5~ a c, 17 :s. vf. zd 9.~ CTu. {J... /LfJ;J,nfd. 

~ , -/-he., //U.S~ ~6 +Ae; oefcNst. tvtr.5 A-//o5d -1-o htiv6 a~d w,Jh,AJ 

_m_f-h .Jud, t..iA-1 hts"""-'d o t tfrt.M1~ /o.NfY" /0{/d. fha p-f_t, drw, ~ tv!() Loudu616:f 

110 .f-It.. 'Z.Co3NJ d,5k,Lf ~+ (\ucf A-6.Se:~-f J_j A -1-A!tUS:k bt.db-£. 

1..u ~" J hou ld .!Je vo 1 ck.-d . 

/iedt;;_{. 

A.PP J, c_rrv~ fh f'W.) -1---/, A-+ +h '-S · tno+, ou bt5 ::!~W Aud sA rei t+f'/, dfrvJ !-

~~~- l 

u.J , +·h LoYft--IW TotAJ M...M +h~ ..!::.~ S IJ rtV 

o-P +h ,_s [ouL+. 

~~-:JPt:L-+tu II~ sui:Jm, fle-d 

~~: 4-·tS· tK 

~1~ 
[a_-J_, t~ tA-bG tJ t 5:i_ VI CJ3 

-,--.. SAfl'lLk?:J -/(opkf kJ.S .. -=tt/o/34)¥,. hatS6Y r~+J.:r +lt'jt+-1-fi1J.J 

rno+tDAJ 6! -ht:sMutA-1 wtt:S. m ~~ /eel ..tR .f;/,.5, P5. +a _' 

{')yl. L\\.rnw.:r,l ~ ou 4-· IS· 1S 

\
### 8 Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2011

- 0961 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2011

- NE

- 22

- A D

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condi tion costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$85/h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Flee t



### Inspect 3rd and 4th

stage wheels at

1,750 hours when

the turbine is

already

disassembled. 2.0 $ 170.00 $ 170.00 3,769 $ 640,730.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance: 

### 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 640,730



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 0

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

### 9

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : 

### The majority of

turbine wheel inspections will occur at the schedued gas producer turbine overhaul at 1,750 hours.

In that case, the total time to inspect the wheels will be 2 .0 hours.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alas ka. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 5

SECTION 5

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 264

(ex Article 231 TEC)

(ex Article 231 TEC)

If the action is well founded, the Court of Justice of the European Union shall declare the act concerned to be void.

However, the Court shall, if it considers this necessary, state which of the effects of the act which it has declared void shall be considered as definitive.

---
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

27.   Declaration on Article 85(1), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 85(1), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference considers that the regulations referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 85(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should take into account national rules and practices relating to the initiation of criminal investigations.

---
# C_2016202EN.01005001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/50

---

Article 1

1.   This Treaty organises the functioning of the Union and determines the areas of, delimitation of, and arrangements for exercising its competences.

2.   This Treaty and the Treaty on European Union constitute the Treaties on which the Union is founded. These two Treaties, which have the same legal value, shall be referred to as ‘the Treaties’.

---
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Carter-Wallace, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-00499) on Form S-8 of Carter-Wallace, Inc. of our report dated May 10, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Carter-Wallace, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, retained earnings and comprehensive earnings, and cash
flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2000, and
related financial statement schedule which report appears in the March 31, 2000
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Carter-Wallace, Inc.

                                                                       KPMG LLP

New York, New York
June 13, 2000