alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20523 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN JESUS GONZALEZ-LOZOYA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CR-5-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 22, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juan Jesus Gonzalez-Lozoya appeals the sentence he received after pleading guilty to being an alien, previously deported after commission of an aggravated offense, who reentered the United States without permission of the Attorney General. Gonzalez-Lozoya argues that the district court erred in failing to make a downward departure. After reviewing the sentencing hearing and the arguments on appeal, we find that the district court did not misapprehend its authority to depart but that,No. 98-20523 -2- instead, its refusal to depart was an exercise of discretion which this court lacks jurisdiction to review on appeal. See United States v. Burleson , 22 F.3d 93, 95 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. DiMarco , 46 F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995). APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1235 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To provide that the term of office of certain members of 

the Merit Systems Protection Board shall be extended 

by a period of 1 year, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1235 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘MSPB Temporary 

3 Term Extension Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD MEMBERS: 

5 TERM EXTENSION AND LIMITATION ON SERV6 ICE. 

7 The term of office of any member of the Merit Sys8 tems Protection Board appointed under section 1202 of 

9 title 5, United States Code, serving as such a member on 

10 the date of enactment of this Act shall be extended for 

11 a period of one year beyond the date the member’s service 

12 would otherwise end under subsection (c) of such section. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 25, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

 

I, John P. D. Cato, Chairman, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of The Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of thisCertification:

 

1.    the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended January 28,2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.    the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: March 27, 2012

|   |                     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | /s/  John P. D. Cato     |   |
|   | John  P. D. Cato         |   |
|   | Chairman,  President and |   |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

 

74

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel Phase II Trials in Lung Disease.                    

*Date:*                         February 1, 2013.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Renaissance Washington DC, Dupont Circle, 1143 New Hampshire Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20037.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Stephanie L. Constant, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7189, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-443-8784,                         *constantsl@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 3, 2013.

Michelle Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2013-00172 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART ONE

PRINCIPLES

PRINCIPLES

TITLE II

PROVISIONS HAVING GENERAL APPLICATION

PROVISIONS HAVING GENERAL APPLICATION

Article 10

In defining and implementing its policies and activities, the Union shall aim to combat discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.

---
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                    |  |                                                  
|----------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|NAME                                |  | STATE OR COUNTRY OF ORGANIZATION
OR INCORPORATION
|LUBCO, Inc.                         |  | Delaware                                         
|Lubys Bevco, Inc.                  |  | Texas                                            
|Lubys Holdings, Inc.               |  | Delaware                                         
|Lubys Limited Partner, Inc.        |  | Delaware                                         
|Lubys Management, Inc.             |  | Delaware                                         
|Lubys Fuddruckers Restaurants, LLC |  | Texas                                            
|Fuddruckers of Howard County, LLC   |  | Maryland                                         
|Fuddruckers of Annapolis, LLC       |  | Maryland                                         
|R. Wes, Inc                         |  | Texas
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL SANTANA,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE AND 

ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 147 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2017, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or 

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
r 

CAUSE NO. 2013-116 


STEVEN BROWN § 

§ 

VS. § 

§ 

TIM JACKSON CONSTRUCTION § 

CO., INC. d/b/a JACKSON § 

CONSTRUCTION CO. and JACK § 

YATES DRYWALL, INC. § WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS 

PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF APPEAL 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

Pursuant to Rule 25.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff gives 

notice of his desire to appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals 

District of Texas, at Texarkana, Texas, from a judgment granting Defendant's NoEvidence Motion for Summary Judgment. The Trial Court's Order was signed on March 

17,2015. 

Plaintiff has provided a copy ofthis Notice to the Sixth Court of Appeals. 

Respectfully submitted, 

mail: ttur@peavlergroup.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

1 

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/16/2015 4:06:31 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
, 


1 1_'__ 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing was delivered, pursuant to 

Rule21a, T.R.C.P. to all counsel ofrecord as shown below: 

Mr. Preston McGee 

FLOWERS & DAVIS, PLLC 

1021 ESE Loop 323, Suite 200 

Tyler, Texas 75701 

This -/IJ-day Of-+44H-"-"-fI 

l 

I 

f 

,

" 

I

~ 

2
Order entered December 27, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 00870 - CV BLACKSTONE MEDICAL, INC. D/B/A ORTHOFIX SPINAL IMPLANTS, Appellant V. PHOENIX SURGICALS, L LC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 11 - 00902 - D 

### O RDER We GRANT appellee’s December 19, 2013 unopposed third motion for an extension of the briefing deadlines. Appellee/cross

- appellant shall file its brief on or before January 10, 2014
. Appellant/cross

- appellee shall file its reply brief on or before February 28, 2014. We caution the parties that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Supreme Court ofthe United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

April 20, 2015

Glerk

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District

301 Fannin Street

Houston, TX 77002-2066

Re: Alma Richardson

v. Texas Workforce Commission, et al.

No. 14-8431

(Your No. 01-13-00403-CV)

Dear Clerk:

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202)479-3011

FILEDIN 1ST COURT OF APPEALS

APR 24 2015

CLERK.

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

4.tf?u\

Scott S. Harris, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000015511
<NAME> THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              79
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      444
<ALLOWANCES>                                        50
<INVENTORY>                                        255
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,117
<PP&E>                                          26,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,210
<BONDS>                                          4,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,459
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,637
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,094
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,892
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,950
<INCOME-TAX>                                       721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,229
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
CUT OUT

Inspection Aid No. 95

Page 1 of 2 Evaluation of Dark Particles in Peanut Butter July 2016

FOLD ALONG THIS LINE

STEP 1

Using a spatula or flat knife, apply a uniform layer of peanut butter over the area outlined below. This thickness of the 

layer is considered correct when the lines of the reverse surface of the paper are barely visible over the entire outlined 

area.

STEP 2 

After applying the peanut butter, fold the upper half of the form down over the lower half, and view the peanut butter

sample within the cutout area. 

This inspection aid is designed for use with the USDA PHOTOGRAPHIC GUIDES, 

ILLUSTRATING DEGREES OF DARK PARTICLE ALLOWANCE IN PEANUT BUTTER, in 

accordance with the INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSPECTION OF PEANUT BUTTER. THIS 

INSPECTION AID IS INTENDED TO BE PRINTED AS A TWO SIDED DOCUMENT.
Marketing and Regulatory Programs – Agricultural Marketing Service – Specialty Crops Program – Specialty Crops Inspection Division 2 of 2

 

STEP 3.

When the cut-out area is in place over the sample, compare the peanut butter within the area with the photo-guides 

that illustrate the degree of dark particle allowances in Grade A and Grade B. Make the comparison on an over-all 

impression basis. DO NOT COUNT THE PARTICLES.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Reyes, Sr., Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered December 16, 1988, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and one count of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 8 years to life (two), and *2-Va to*7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant and others sold a quarter kilogram of cocaine to undercover DEA agents in Manhattan. A second sale was arranged, and at the pre-arranged meeting place, the defendant and his accomplices were arrested. While in custody, defendant consented to a search of two apartments which he owned at 617 West 152nd Street. Inside one of the apartments, cash, drugs, drug paraphernalia and a weapon were recovered.

Defendant’s consent established the predicate for the warrantless search of the apartment *(Payton v New York,*445 US 573). Under the factors set forth in *People v Gonzalez*(115 AD2d 73, *affd*68 NY2d 950), we find no basis to disturb the findings of the hearing court that defendant’s consent was voluntary. Although defendant was in custody at the time of the consent, this fact alone does not nullify the consent *(see, People v Estrella,*160 AD2d 250, *lv denied*76 NY2d 787). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 14, 2015

Order 

April 14, 2015

150883-4 & (111)

WEATHERSEAL HOME IMPROVEMENTS, INC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

RICHARD J. SABLE,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

GRECO TITLE AGENCY, L.L.C., DEAN B. 

WATSON, DOW CHEMICAL EMPLOYEES 

CREDIT UNION, DIANA M. SABLE, ANDY 

SAKMAR, and SAKMAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Defendants.

SC: 150883-4

COA: 313078, 314079

Oakland CC: 2011-119024-CZ

__________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation to dismiss the application for leave to 

appeal is GRANTED. The dismissal is with prejudice and without costs to either party.
1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Room 2646-South, STOP 0268

Washington, DC 20250-0201

October 8, 2014

MEMORANDUM TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIC STANDARDS BOARD (NOSB)

FROM: Miles V. McEvoy

Deputy Administrator

National Organic Program (NOP)

SUBJECT: Process Clarification for Sunset Review of the National List of Allowed and Prohibited 

Substances (National List)

The Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 (OFPA) requires that the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), 

a 15-member federal advisory committee, review all substances and that the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) 

renew these substances, within 5 years of their addition to or renewal on the National List. This action of NOSB 

review and USDA renewal is commonly referred to as the “Sunset Process.” 

Since the publication of the Sunset Process notice in the Federal Register on September 16, 2013 (78 FR 56811), 

The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has received feedback from the public and the NOSB concerning the 

role of the subcommittees in the sunset review process. AMS has received requests to clarify that the NOSB 

completes the sunset review, not the subcommittees. 

AMS is reiterating that the NOSB is responsible for reviewing all substances under the Sunset Process. 

The NOSB will complete its 2015 sunset review process for seven substances at the October 2014 public meeting. 

The NOSB Crops Subcommittee has conducted a preliminary review of 3 substances and included a motion to 

remove for each substance. The NOSB Handling Subcommittee has conducted a preliminary review of 4 handling 

substances and included a motion to remove for each substance.

During the October 2014 meeting, the NOSB will conduct a vote to remove for each substance that is under 2015 

sunset review. Whether the motions to remove pass or fail, the completion of the vote by the NOSB concludes the 

review process for each substance. A failed motion on a substance indicates that the NOSB determined a

substance continues to meet required OFPA criteria and AMS may publish a Federal Register notice announcing 

that the listing will be renewed for five years. A passed motion on a substance indicates that the NOSB 

determined a substance no longer meets the OFPA criteria and the NOSB will make a recommendation to AMS

for removal of the substance. AMS will review the recommendation and determine whether to proceed with 

rulemaking to remove the substance from the National List. 

The NOSB plays a critical role in reviewing substances to ensure that all substances on the National List 

meet the criteria specified in the Organic Foods Production Act and AMS thanks the NOSB for its critical 

work on the National List.
Agricultural Marketing Service, Specialty Crops Program, Specialty Crops Inspection Division

This PATCH represents official guidance. This PATCH is scheduled to be incorporated into the 

document listed above. After incorporation into the document listed above this PATCH will 

become obsolete. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

PATCH # 069 Moratorium on Mandatory Inspections 

Required by the Walnut Marketing Order (Draft)

SCI Division Inspection Series

Page 1 of 1

PATCH # 069

DOCUMENT: Walnuts (Juglans regia) in the Shell and Shelled Inspection Instructions, 

December 1974

REMARKS: Moratorium on Mandatory Inspections Required by the Walnut Marketing Order

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has announced a six-month moratorium on the 

enforcement of mandatory inspection requirements under the Federal marketing order for 

California walnuts that will begin Sept. 1, 2021. This moratorium also includes inspection 

requirements on walnuts imported into the United States under Section 8e of the Agricultural 

Marketing Agreement Act of 1937.

The moratorium will remain in place for six months. If the California Walnut Board (CWB)

submits a proposal for a formal rulemaking to address the inspection requirements in the 

marketing order, USDA will extend the moratorium until resolution of the rulemaking process.

A copy of this notification may be found on the AMS web site at the following link: 

https://www.ams.usda.gov/content/usda-announces-moratorium-mandatory-inspectionsrequired-walnut-marketing-order. This announcement is also available on the Walnut 

commodity pages under the Detailed standards, Inspection Instructions & Other Resources

section at the following links:

• Shelled Walnuts - https://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards/shelled-walnuts-gradesand-standards

• Walnuts in the Shell - https://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards/walnuts-shell-gradesand-standards