alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-68,832-02

RAY JASPER, Applicant

ORDER PURSUANT TO TEXAS RULE OF

APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.10

Per curiam.

ORDER

This cause is before this Court on application for writ of habeas corpus from trial court

case number 1999CR2645A in the 187 District Court of Bexar County.

th

The Clerk of this Court has discovered sensitive data in the record, namely: juror

questionnaire. TEX.R. APP. P. Rule 9.10(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

9.10, the Clerk sought a ruling from the Court and thereafter notified the parties. The Court

now orders the Clerk of this Court to redact or seal the discovered sensitive data from the

records identified and listed below. The Court further orders the trial court clerk, the clerk

of the court of appeals, or any entity or individual possessing the following documents to
Rule 9.10 Order - 2

redact or seal the documents pursuant to this order:

1. Clerk’s Record - juror questionnaire - no trial court order pursuant to CCP Art.

35.29 (b)

Filed: April 8, 2015

Do not publish
Exhibit 21

                              Subsidiaries


     Avcon Industries, Inc., a Kansas Corporation

     Butler National Services, Inc., a Florida Corporation, formerly
     Lauderdale Services, Inc.

     Butler National Corporation Consulting Engineers, Inc., a Kansas
     Corporation, formerly HSD, Inc.

     Butler National Service Corporation, a Kansas corporation, formerly a
     Delaware Corporation

     Butler National, Inc., a Nevada Corporation

     Butler Temporary Services, Inc., a Missouri Corporation

     Butler National Corporation, a Nebraska Corporation, formerly
     Woodson Avionics, Inc.

     Cansas International Corporation, a Delaware Corporation


<PAGE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



Gothic Energy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Letter Regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:     Gothic Energy Corporation and Subsidiaries
        Registration on Form S-3

We are aware that our report dated May 15, 1998 on our review of the interim 
financial information of Gothic Energy Corporation for the period ended March 
31, 1998 and included in this Form 10-QSB is incorporated by reference in the 
Company's registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-23239). Pursuant to 
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be 
considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by us 
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.

Tulsa, Oklahoma
May 19, 1998
## SERVED FEBRUARY 

## 24, 2010

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF FRONTIERAIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. CP09NM0013 (Civil Penalty Action) DMS No. FAA-2009-1040 

### AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER Paragraph #2 ofthe Procedural Order is amended as follows: WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule:

... On or before May 1, 2010, theparties shall conclude all discovery including, but not limited to, depositions, documentproduction, responses toproduction requests and/or interrogatories. lftheparties cannot resolve a discovery dispute they shallsubmit the dispute to the undersignedfor resolution in a timely 1 manner...

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge Attachment

- Service List

I The court does not anticipate schedulingthis case priorto 1May 2010.

,'IIW".

### FAA Docket No. CP09NM0013 (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOOOl ONE COPY 

### Jennifer E. Trock, Respondent's Counsel 

### Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 2300 N Street, N.W. Washington, DC**20037~1122** 

### TEL: 202-663-9179 FAX:**202~663-8007** 

### Scott R. Morris, Complainant's Counsel 

### Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98057-3356 TEL:**425-227~1417** 

### FAX: 425-227-1007 The HonorableRichard C. 

### Goodwin,Administrative Law Judge 

### Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Building Ground Floor Room E12-320 Washington, DC 20590 TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 FAX: 202**366~7536**

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20




                   SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE LIFE INSURANCE PROGRAM



         Executives of FirstMerit Corporation ("Corporation") are eligible for
group life insurance coverage of $50,000. In addition, a Variable Adjustable
Life Insurance Policy is issued to and owned by the executive in the
pre-retirement death benefit amount of $500,000. The beneficiary of this
Variable Life Policy is at the discretion of the executive. Premiums on this
life insurance policy are paid by the Corporation during the time while the
executive is actively a member of the FirstMerit Executive Committee and until
his/her retirement. If the executive should leave the Corporation or cease to be
a member of the FirstMerit Executive Committee, for reasons other than
retirement, premium payments will cease to be the obligation of the Corporation
and the executive will assume full responsibility for all future premium
payments necessary to maintain the policy.

         Upon retirement, the $50,000 group portion will cease. The individual
Variable Adjustable Life Policy, explained above, is targeted to provide an
amount of death benefit in retirement based upon the executive's age at the time
of entry into the Executive Committee, and based upon an assumed interest or
investment rate of return in the policy. If entry to the Executive Committee is
prior to age 55, the post-retirement death benefit is targeted to be $500,000.
If entry is between age 55 and 59, the post-retirement death benefit is targeted
to be $350,000. If entry is at or after age 60, the post-retirement death
benefit is targeted to be $200,000. This policy has many options for the
executive to consider with regards to investment options.
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION



I, Randall K. Gausman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tut Systems, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



By:/s/    RANDALL K. GAUSMANRandall K. Gausman Vice-President, Finance and Administration Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)




Date: July 31, 2003
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-69516 and 333-124597 on Form S-3 andRegistration Statement Nos. 33-61035, 33-39837, 333-87228, and 333-88419on Form S-8 of our reports relating to the financial statements andfinancial statement of schedule of Cascade Natural Gas Corporation (whichreport on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement ofthe 2004 and 2003 consolidated financial statements) and to management's reporton the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting datedDecember 9, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofCascade Natural Gas Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2005.

 

 
| \s\ Deloitte & Touche LLP |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |
| Seattle, Washington                |
| December 14, 2005             |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23495-23496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLORW00000 L16100000.DP0000. WBSLXSS073H0000; HAG 12-0164]


Notice of Public Meeting, Eastern Washington Resource Advisory 
Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 23496]]

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Eastern 
Washington Resource Advisory Council (EWRAC) will meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: May 23, 2012

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. It 
will begin at 10 a.m. and end at 4 p.m. Members of the public will have 
an opportunity to address the EWRAC at 10 a.m. The meeting will be held 
at Big Bend Community College, 7662 N.E. Chanute Street, Moses Lake, 
Washington, 98837-2950. Discussion will include the Bureau of Land 
Management's Eastern Washington and San Juan Resource Management Plan, 
and the U.S. Forest Service's Colville National Forest Plan Revision.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert St. Clair, BLM Spokane 
District, 1103 N. Fancher Rd., Spokane Valley, WA 99212, or call (509) 
536-1200. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf 
(TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1 (800) 
877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. 
The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message 
or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during 
normal business hours.

Daniel C. Picard,
Spokane District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2012-9457 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00561

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.E.A. and A.G.A., Children

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 02472

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

Appellant is unable to afford payment of court costs; no costs are taxed in this appeal.

Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is DENIED.

SIGNED January 9, 2019.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
National Organic Program Update for the 

National Organic Standards Board Meeting 

Fall 2020 – Part 2 

Presented by

Jennifer Tucker 

October 28, 2020 
NOP Update in 

Organic Integrity 

Learning Center

USDA Agricultural Marketing Service | National Organic Program 2
Organic Control Systems Remain 

Resilient and Strong With 

Shifting Dynamics Over Time 
Update: 

Origin of 

Livestock 
National Organic Program FY 2021 Goals

5

1

2

4

3

Strong Organic 

Control Systems 

Trusted People, 

Processes, and Rules

Robust Consistent and Fair 

Enforcement Market for All

Develop 

Standards

Open, Transparent,

Collaborative Processes

Engage Partners 

and Stakeholders 

Advance Initiatives & 

Clarify Requirements
| (1) | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |   |   |                                                                                       |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| November      16, 2009 |   | By:    |   | /s/      Craig A.      Waltzer           |
|                   |   |   |   | Craig      A. Waltzer                                                                      |
|                   |   |   |   | Chief      Executive Officer, President andDirector                                        |
Plant Variety Protection - 25 Certificates Issued on April 29, 2022

APPLICATION 

NUMBER

VARIETY NAME CROP APPLICANT / OWNER *CERTIFIED 

SEED ONLY?

201900379 01072899 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900380 01077815 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900381 01072287 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900382 01073204 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900383 01073237 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900384 01073253 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900385 01073261 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900386 01073270 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900387 01073272 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900388 01073279 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900389 01073281 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900390 01073329 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900391 01073335 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900393 01073340 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900394 01073350 SOYBEAN Monsanto Technology, LLC No

201900420 ND Rolette SOYBEAN NDSU Research Foundation Yes

201900423 Red Cedar FIELD BEAN Board of Trustees of Michigan State University Yes

202000004 Lady Terra POTATO C. Meijer BV No

202000014 MFL-2P59 SOYBEAN Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. No

202000015 MFS-48P1 SOYBEAN Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. No

202000019 PSQ9Z169148 TOMATO Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. No

202000021 PSQ9Z169141 TOMATO Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. No

202000024 Jackson GARDEN BEAN Holland-Select Research B.V. No

202000035 5PSMT60 SOYBEAN Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000036 5PCVB54 SOYBEAN Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

* Certified seed - seed which has been determined by an official seed certifying agency to conform to standards of genetic purity and identity as to variety, 

which standards have been approved by the Secretary.

USDA, AMS, Science and Technology, Plant Variety Protection Office (202) 260-8983 Page 1 of 1
OSWER/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460



## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)

***Final Site*** Septe mb er 2014 

### NORTH SHORE DRIVE Elkhart, Indiana Elkhart County

 Site Lo cation:

The North S ho re Dr

iv e site contains a contaminated ground water plume wi th no identified source lo ca ted in the city of Elkhart, Elkh a rt County, Indiana. The ground water plume is approximately 70 acres and is located north of the St. Joseph
River and south of Old U.S. 20.

 Site Hi

st or y: The No rth Sho re Dr

iv e s it e was initiall y discov ered in 199 6. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) has continued to investiga te the plume by obtaining drinking water sa mp les from priv a te homes. In five
homes contaminants exc ee ded the Sa fe Drinking Water Act Ma ximum Contaminant Lev e ls (M CLs). Despite sev era l investigations in the area, the origin of the contam in ants is unknown.

 Site Contamination/Contaminants: The plume consists of chlorinated solvents, sp ec ificall y t ri chloroethene (TCE), cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2

- DC E), tetrachloroethene (PCE) and tran s-1, 2-dichloroethene (trans-1,2 -DCE).

 Potential Im

p ac ts on Surrounding Community/Environment:

ID EM sa mp led drinking wells from 43 residences in the area and found 12 contaminat ed re si dential wel ls

, five of whi ch

ex cee ded the MCL. About 147 residential drinking wells within 1⁄4 mi le of the plume co uld be potentiall y contaminated by
th is site.

 R es pon se Activities (t

o date):

IDEM h as p rovided c ar

bon filters to nine re si dential homes for the wells in whi ch contamination approached or ex cee ded
the MCL s. Oth er investigations have identi fi e d potential sources of contamination; howeve r, the o rig in of the
contaminants remains unknown.

 Ne ed for NPL Listi

ng: The state of Indiana refer re d the si te to the EPA b ecause the contaminated ground water plume is aff ec ting nearb y residence s. Listing will allow for an investigation in t o the n ature and extent of contamination. Other federal and state

c le anup p rograms we re ev aluat ed but a re not viable at th is time. The EPA re ce iv ed a letter of support for placing th is site
on the NPL from the state.

[ The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1- 888

- 42 -ATSDR or 1- 888

- 422

- 8737.
#### STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Keith Michael JENSEN, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 16747.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Feb. 28, 1980.

Cheryl A. Russell, Logan, for defendant and appellant.

Robert B. Hansen, Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order revoking defendant, Jensen’s probation, for violation of its terms, to-wit: (1) by leaving the “Half-Way House” to which he was assigned after conviction on a bad check charge, (2) and committing an offense having to do with unlawfully using another’s business phone. He claims error in the probation revocation, to which he pleaded guilty, saying that he was denied the testimony of an out of state witness who, he contended, could have explained the phone calls, but he had no excuse for walking away from the Half-Way House, an act prohibited under his probation status and privilege.

His sole basis for appeal is that he involuntarily and unintentionally pleaded guilty to the probation violation. The record belies his contention by reflecting the contrary, after a dialogue with the trial court. His counsel conceded the accuracy of the record, but nonetheless complied with the principles of *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), by presenting numerous authorities having to do with the circumstances necessary to demonstrate any kind of compulsion or lack of explanation to upset a guilty plea, none of which would be apropos here.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. No costs awarded.

WILKINS, Justice

(dissenting):

I respectfully dissent. The transcript fails to disclose, in my opinion, the requisites required by *Boykin v. Alabama,*395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), and *State v. Olafson,*Utah, 567 P.2d 156 (1977). It seems to me that the record, which is related below, vividly demonstrates the absence of these requisites:

> *235(DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL): Mr. Jensen at this time is willing to plead guilty to the probation violation with the understanding, and because of the situation that has b.een presented to us, that he still denies that he ever made the unauthorized calls to A and M Mowers. He is without a defense because we cannot get a hold of Douglas Russell, but he has violated the rules and regulations of the Halfway House as indicated by that representative in the matters that he indicated he would have just let go unnoticed if it had not been for the phone calls, and that’s the only way we can handle it, your honor, because of him being incarcerated, so that’s how we have to handle it.

> THE COURT: Mr. Jensen, does that conform to what your opinion is, and has your attorney stated your position accurately?

> MR. JENSEN: Yeah.

The defendant should be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty because, I believe, in no way could it be deemed to be a free, voluntary, understanding, and intelligent plea.

MAUGHAN, J., concurs in the views expressed in the dissenting opinion of WILKINS, J.