alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1823]


Reorganization and Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 109 Under 
Alternative Site Framework, Jefferson County, NY

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (74 
FR 1170, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/2009; 75 FR 71069-
71070, 11/22/2010) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of general-purpose zones;
    Whereas, the County of Jefferson, New York, grantee of Foreign-
Trade Zone 109, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket 70-
2011, filed 11/07/2011) for authority to reorganize and expand under 
the ASF with a service area of Jefferson County, New York, adjacent to 
the Alexandria Bay U.S. Customs and Border Protection port of entry, 
FTZ 109's existing Sites 1 and new Sites 3 and 4 would be categorized 
as magnet sites, and existing Site 2 would be removed from the zone 
project;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (76 FR 70110, 11/10/2011) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize and expand FTZ 109 under the 
alternative site framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board's standard 
2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone 
project, to an ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would 
terminate authority for Site 3 if not activated by April 30, 2017 and 
Site 4 if not activated by April 30, 2020.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of April 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,
 Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9823 Filed 4-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v *764Carlos Rodriguez, Respondent.

—Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), entered February 20, 1990, which granted the defendant’s motion to set aside a verdict convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, based upon alleged prosecutorial misconduct during summation.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is denied, the verdict is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Following the jury’s rendition of a verdict of guilty, the Supreme Court set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30 (1) on the ground that the prosecutor’s comments during summation denied the defendant a fair trial. On appeal, the People contend that the prosecutor’s summation was proper, and that any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, the court’s curative instructions, and the court’s main charge to the jury.

We agree. Prior to summations, the court explained to the jury "[i]f I sustain an objection to an argument, then you must disregard the argument that was made, and if it comes into your mind during deliberating, you’re not to mention it to the other jurors or consider it when you’re reaching your own decision in the case”. Additionally, a review of the People’s summation demonstrates that after each allegedly improper comment, the court promptly and forcefully instructed the jury to ignore the argument of the prosecutor. Under these circumstances, we find that the Judge’s forceful response to the prosecutor’s behavior obviated any prejudice to the defendant that might have resulted from the prosecutor’s remarks *(see, People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396; *People v Christopher,*170 AD2d 1020). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Lubys, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, K. Scott Gray, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                    
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    K. SCOTT
GRAY                                                               
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | K. Scott Gray                                                                      
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
and Principal Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 7 (Thursday, January 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2287-2288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00342]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-81,718]


Daimler Buses North America, Inc., a Subsidiary of Daimler North 
America Corp, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Noramtec, First 
Choice Staffing, Staff Works, and Mr. Santo Lamarco From Wurth Revcar 
Fasteners, Inc., Oriskany, NY; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on September 28, 2012, applicable to workers of Daimler Buses North 
America, Inc. a subsidiary of Daimler North America Corp., including 
leased workers from Noramtec, First Choice Staffing, and Staff Works, 
Oriskany, New York. The workers are engaged in activities related to 
the production of transit buses. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on October 12, 2012 (77 FR 62260).

[[Page 2288]]

    At the request of New York State Department of Labor, the 
Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. 
New information shows that a worker leased from Wurth Revcar Fasteners, 
Inc. was also employed on-site at Daimler Buses North America, Inc., 
Oriskany, New York. The Department has determined that this worker was 
sufficiently under the control of Daimler Buses North America, Inc. to 
be considered a leased worker.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased 
customer imports of transit buses.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include the worker leased from Wurth Revcar Fasteners, 
Inc. working on-site at the Oriskany, New York location of the subject 
firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-81,718 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Daimler Buses North America, Inc., a subsidiary 
of Daimler North America Corp., including on-site leased workers 
from Noramtec, First Choice Staffing, Staff Works, and Mr. Santo 
LaMarco from Wurth Revcar Fasteners, Inc., Oriskany, New York, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
June 8, 2011, through September 28, 2014, and all workers in the 
group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on 
date of certification through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of December 2012.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2013-00342 Filed 1-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2012326EN.01033101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |

---

ANNEXES

ANNEX II

OVERSEAS COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES TO WHICH THE PROVISIONS OF PART FOUR OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION APPLY

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Greenland, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | New Caledonia and Dependencies, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | French Polynesia, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | French Southern and Antarctic Territories, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Wallis and Futuna Islands, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Mayotte, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Saint Pierre and Miquelon, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Aruba, |

| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| — | Netherlands Antilles: | | | | --- | --- | | — | Bonaire, | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Curaçao, | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Saba, | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Sint Eustatius, | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Sint Maarten, | |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Anguilla, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Cayman Islands, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Falkland Islands, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Montserrat, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Pitcairn, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Saint Helena and Dependencies, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | British Antarctic Territory, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | British Indian Ocean Territory, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Turks and Caicos Islands, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | British Virgin Islands, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bermuda. |

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00051-CR

NO. 02-13-00052-CR

TRIMYIAN BARROW A/K/A 

TRYMYIAN BARROW

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant Trimyian Barrow a/k/a Trymyian 

Barrow pled guilty to aggravated sexual assault by threats and placing in fear, a 

first-degree felony, 2and violating a protective order, a third-degree felony, 3and 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021(a)(1), (2)(A)(ii)–(iii), (e) (West Supp. 

2012).

3See id. § 25.07(a), (g).
2

the trial court convicted him of those offenses and sentenced him to ten years’ 

confinement in each case. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal in each case.

For each case, the trial court’s certification states that this is a pleabargained case and that Appellant has no right of appeal. Accordingly, we 

informed Appellant by letter on February 6, 2013, that these cases were subject 

to dismissal unless he or any party showed grounds for continuing the appeals

on or before Tuesday, February 19, 2013.

4

 Appellant timely responded, but his 

response does not raise grounds for continuing the appeals. We therefore 

dismiss these appeals.

5

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: March 28, 2013

 

4See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 25.2(d).

5See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).
2230 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 (202)225-4404-PHONE (202)226-6326-FAx 

# Cougnan

g

# of the Eluiteb *tateo CAPE GIRARDEAU OFFICE 2502 TANNER DRIVE, SUITE 205 

## ^ouoe of te^rt^entatibt g CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO 63703 (573) 335-0101-PHONE 

## Ma g ljington, MC 20515 -250S FARMINGTON OFFICE 22 E. COLUMBIA STREET FARMINGTON, M063640 (573)756-9755-PHONE

ROLLA OFFICE 830A S. BISHOP ROLLA, MO 65401 (573)364-2455-PHONE 

## May 5, 2014 WEST PLAINS OFFICE 35 COURT SGUARE, Su1TE 300 WEST PLAINS, MO 65775 (417)255-1515-PHONE http://www.jasonsmith.house.gov JASON SMITH BTH DISTRICT, MISSOURI COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY

COURTS,INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND THE iNTERNET SUBCOMMITTEE REGULATORY REFORM, COMMERCIAL AND ANTITRUST LAw SUBCOMMITTEE CONSTITUTION AND CIVIL JUSTICE SUBCOMMITTEE COMMITTEE ON NATURALRESOURCES
PUBLIC LANDS AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION SUBCOMMITTEE FISHERIES, WILDLIFE, OCEANS AND INSULAR AFFAIRS SUBCOMMITTEE



## The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 Dear Administrator McCarthy,

I have serious concerns with the Revised New Source Performance Standards for new residential wood heaters being proposed by your agency. Wood heating is a renewable form of energy often taken advantage of by lower-income, rural citizens who find it hard to afford other forms of heat. Wood heaters allow these individuals to heat their homes with a carbon neutral resource that is readily available. Of the 288,960 households identified in my district during the 2008-2012 American Community Survey, about 30,000 were reported as primarily relying on wood to heat their homes, or ten percent. These individuals should not be punished for their self-reliance, or their forethought to take advantage of an abundant, eco-friendly fuel like wood. Expensive new regulations that will force the re-design of most wood-stove models currently being sold are also unwarranted and unwelcome. Small businesses have been built around this renewable industry. To force them to go back to the drawing boards with their products could have significant, detrimental effects on their business models. As this process continues to move forward, I would invite you to seriously reconsider any proposal that would appear to discriminate against rural areas, which use a much greater proportion of wood heat as compared to urban or suburban environments. Times are already tough enough. A given home in my district is five times more likely to be heated with wood than the national average. I appreciate your thoughtful consideration of the comments from individuals and businesses who will be most affected by this rule, and hope that you will see fit to correct its detrimental effect on my constituents.Sincerely, 

# ^

Jason Smith MEMBER OF CONGRESS
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Research and 

Innovative Technology 

Administration 

Michael Lotz 

President 

Mesa Airlines 

410 North 44th Street 

Suite 100 

Phoeniz, Arizona 85008 

Dear Ms. Nelson: 

". - -",'""':-. -''"\' l 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

July 1, 2010 

The Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) has decided to release Mesa Airlines 1st quarter 

2010 Form 41 financial reports. Mesa had requested that these reports be withheld from public 

disclosure because Mesa had submitted its Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) reports. 

In faimess to investors, companies are not allowed to release to the public their sensitive business 

data until the data has been filed with the SEC. 

Bureau of Transportation Statistics had requested that Mesa verify its SEC due date Of extension. 

To date, BTS has not received the requested verification. Therefore, Mesa Airlines' Form 41 1st 

quarter report will be released 10 days after the date of this letter unless a timely filed petition of 

reconsideration is received. 

This action is taken under authority delegated by 14 CFR 385.19(i). If you have any question, 

please contact Bernie Stankus at bernard.stankus@dot.gov. 

Sincerely, 

(). ~~ Anne Suissa 

Director 

Office of Airline Information 

cc: 

Alme.N elson @mesa-air.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          28,434
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,516
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    406,078
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               458,028
<PP&E>                                          74,498
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 532,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          480,585
<BONDS>                                      2,611,752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,946
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,206,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,314,906
<SALES>                                        431,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               431,742
<CGS>                                          299,788
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  299,788
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (315,841)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (181,076)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (191,087)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (191,087)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
| 1.   | The Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 10, 2011 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June 10, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Tracy L. Morris               |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   | Tracy L. MorrisChief Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Capstead
Securities Corporation IV's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                  308
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      915,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    28
<BONDS>                             898,446
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  1
<OTHER-SE>                           17,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        915,795
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     62,577
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      2,367
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   58,675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       1,535
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   1,535
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          1,535
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 7 OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on February 11, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Loretta Strache, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-14-00284-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 370016

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s

judgment is MODIFIED to DELETE the assessment of attorney’s fees against

appellant. The trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on April 13, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
JL/awyer

1207 S. SkepLenL Dr.

Houston, Texas 77019

713/523-7878

Fax: 713/523-7887

email: cjkiplnilewis@aol.com

April 9, 2015

FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 13 2015

Abel Acosta, Cier*

Court ofCriminal Appeals

Clerk: Abel Acosta

P.O. Box 12308

Austin, Texas 78711

Re: Damon West, Trial Court Case No. W09-00248-Y (B), CCA No. WR-78,439-02

To Whom It May Concern:

This is a notice that I represent Damon West, Applicant, in regards to the application for

a writ ofhabeas corpus, No. WR-78,439-02.

Regards,

Chip B. Lewis

RECEIVED IN

APR 13 2015