alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1194 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1194

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit fellowship and 
 stipend compensation to be saved in an individual retirement account.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2019

 Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Banks, and Mr. Moulton) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit fellowship and 
 stipend compensation to be saved in an individual retirement account.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Graduate Student Savings Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN NON-TUITION FELLOWSHIP AND STIPEND PAYMENTS TREATED AS 
              COMPENSATION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 219(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``Such term includes any amount paid to an individual to aid the 
individual in the pursuit of graduate or postdoctoral study or 
research.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
National Organic Standards Board 

Policy Development Subcommittee Proposal

Policy and Procedures Manual (PPM) Revision 

January 19, 2022

Introduction and Background 

The Policy and Procedures Manual (PPM) was established to assist the National Organic Standards Board 

(NOSB) in the implementation of its duties under OFPA. It contains operating procedures and policies 

for the NOSB. During the period since the last revision (October 2019), the Policy Development 

Subcommittee has been compiling a list of minor revisions and suggested changes. The PDS has 

reviewed these suggested changes and proposes the following as listed in the table below. 

Summary Table of Changes 

Section/Page Changes (red highlight indicates additions, strikethrough indicates deletions)

VIII. E Page 33 

Made minor clerical changes for clarity.

Added a sentence requiring written commenters to refrain from personal attacks.

Removed a redundant header “Oral Comments”.

E. PUBLIC COMMENT 

The NOP and NOSB encourage public comment and work collaboratively to increase 

opportunities for greater participation by a broad range of people, employing various modes of 

communication and modern technology whenever possible. Individuals may present oral 

comment at either a pre- meeting electronic webinar or at the in-person NOSB meeting.

Individuals are encouraged to submit written comments and may also present oral comment at 

either a pre-meeting electronic webinar or at the in-person NOSB meeting. 

Comments Before Public Meetings:

Written comment: 

All members of the public are encouraged to submit public comment in writing according to the 

Federal Register Notice. Written submissions allow NOSB members the opportunity to read 

comments in advance, eliminate or decrease the need for paper copies to be distributed during 

the meeting, and allow each NOSB member to review and analyze data and information well 

ahead of the public meeting and possible voting. 

 Commenters shall refrain from including personal attacks or remarks that might impugn the 

 character of any individual. 

Oral Comments 

Oral comments: Individuals may present oral comment at either a pre-meeting electronic 

webinar or at the in-person NOSB meeting. May be received via a virtual meeting/webinar. 

Public notice of such electronic meetings will be included in the Federal Register notice 

announcing the public meeting. Such electronic pre-meetings may allow individuals more time 

NOSB Proposals and Discussion Documents April 2022 Page 151 of 152
to present their data or information, reduce the need to attend the public meeting in person, 

reduce our carbon footprint, and give the NOSB more time to absorb the information. Such 

electronic meetings shall be recorded and made available to the public and to NOSB members.

Motion to accept the proposal on the PPM update to the public comment process 

Motion by: Mindee Jeffery

Seconded by: Jerry D’Amore 

Yes: 3 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recuse: 0 

NOSB Proposals and Discussion Documents April 2022 Page 152 of 152
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18.U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Mortgage  Acceptance Company
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
James L. Duggins, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alan P. Hirmes,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


       (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



By:  /s/ James L. Duggins                           By:  /s/ Alan P. Hirmes
     --------------------                                ------------------
     James L. Duggins                                    Alan P. Hirmes
     Chief Executive Officer                             Chief Financial Officer
     November 8, 2006                                    November 8, 2006


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       33
Attachment 3

Marketing and Regulatory Programs

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Competitive Areas for Reduction-in-Force

NOTE:

The local commuting area (LCA) is defined as the assigned duty station.

Organizational Unit: Positions Covered: Competitive Areas:

Headquarters, APHIS

All other Programs and Staff 

Offices not otherwise listed

Positions organizationally 

assigned to:

•Office of the 

Administrator

•All other positions

Positions organizationally 

assigned to:

•Field locations 

• APHIS, OA, duty 

station Washington, 

DC metro area

• By each program 

within the individual 

local commuting area 

NOTE: Frederick, 

MD is included in the 

local commuting area 

of the Washington, DC 

metro area

• By each program 

within the individual 

local commuting area 

1
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 14, 2015

No. 04-14-00742-CR

Andres Solis VIELMA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-09-12304-CR

Honorable Bert Richardson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to access the record is GRANTED. It is ORDERED the district clerk 

of Uvalde County shall prepare and send a full and complete duplicate copy of the clerk’s record 

and the reporter’s record for cause number 2013-09-12304-CR to appellant at TDCJ No. 

1964402, Garza West Unit, 4250 Highway 202, Beeville, TX 78102. It is FURTHER 

ORDERED the district clerk file written notice in this court no later than ten days from the date 

of this order confirming the date the record was sent to appellant.

If, after reviewing the record, appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he must do so within 

thirty days from the date this court receives written notice that the record was sent to appellant

by the district clerk. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no 

later than thirty days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VIII

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

CHAPTER 2

MONETARY POLICY

Article 130

(ex Article 108 TEC)

(ex Article 108 TEC)

When exercising the powers and carrying out the tasks and duties conferred upon them by the Treaties and the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB, neither the European Central Bank, nor a national central bank, nor any member of their decision-making bodies shall seek or take instructions from Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, from any government of a Member State or from any other body. The Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies and the governments of the Member States undertake to respect this principle and not to seek to influence the members of the decision-making bodies of the European Central Bank or of the national central banks in the performance of their tasks.

---
**Exhibit        21**

**Subsidiaries      of Cal-Maine Foods, Inc **

|                                                    |                               | Percentage                  of Outstanding Stock  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                    | Place                  of Incorporation | or                  Ownership Interest Held       |
| Name                  of Subsidiary                     | or                  Organization   | by                  Registrant                    |
|                                                         |                                    |                                                   |
| Cal-Maine                  Farms, Inc.                  | Delaware                           | 100%                                              |
| Southern                  Equipment Distributors, Inc.  | Mississippi                        | 100%                                              |
| South                  Texas Applicators, Inc.          | Delaware                           | 100%                                              |
| Cal-Maine                  Partnership, Ltd.            | Texas                              | (1)                                               |
| CMF                  of Kansas, LLC                     | Delaware                           | (2)                                               |
| Hillandale,                  LLC.                       | Florida                            | 51%                                               |
| American                  Egg Products, Inc.            | Georgia                            | (3)                                               |

----

| (1) | Limited                partnership in which Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. has a 1% General Partner                interest and Cal-Maine Farms, Inc. has a 99% Limited Partner                interest. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | Limited                liability company of which Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Cal-Maine Farms,                Inc.                are members and have 99% and 1% interests,                respectively. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (3) | Cal-Maine                Foods,                Inc. 44% and Hillandale, LLC. 27% |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM FINLAY
ENTERPRISES, INC. FORM 10K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.


</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                            7,961
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    36,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     320,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                405,819
<PP&E>                                          116,055
<DEPRECIATION>                                   41,722
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  598,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           255,108
<BONDS>                                         225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            104
<OTHER-SE>                                      106,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    598,228
<SALES>                                         178,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                178,614
<CGS>                                            87,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    87,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 86,940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2,559)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (787)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,772)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,772)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.17)



</TABLE>
#### Shirley Donohue, Respondent, v Jerold Schwartz, Appellant.

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, J.), entered July 13, 1990, which denied defendant’s motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee recommending dismissal of the action for lack of personal jurisdiction, and granted plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendant’s affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion to confirm the report granted, the motion to dismiss the affirmative defense denied, and the action is dismissed, with costs.

The issue of law raised on this appeal is whether the statute of limitations is tolled by the delivery of process to a person of suitable age and discretion pursuant to CPLR 308 (2), thus rendering without jurisdictional consequence a conceded failure to mail the process to either defendant’s last known residence or actual place of business within the limitations period. (The purported delivery of process was made on January 25, 1988; there was no mailing until August 2, 1988; the act of medical malpractice on which the action is based occurred on January 21, 1986. We note that CPLR 308 [2] was amended, effective January 1, 1989, to require that the delivery and mailing occur within 20 days of each other. Our ruling herein is made only with reference to the statute as it read prior to the amendment.) IAS held that the statute is tolled by such a delivery (citing *Dominion of Canada Gen. Ins. Co. v Pierson,*27 AD2d 484 [involving service of process pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 253 and 254]; *Browning v Nix,*47 Mise 2d 709 [involving a failure to file proof of substituted service until after the statute of limitations had run]; *Esteves v Swobodzien,*195 Misc 956 [also involving a failure to file proof of substituted service within the limitations period]), rejecting the Special Referee’s recommendation to the contrary (citing, *inter alia,*the Second Department’s decisions in *Booth v Lipton,*87 AD2d 856; *Brownell v Feingold,*82 AD2d 844; *Glikman v Horowitz,*66 AD2d 814). This was error. We are in accord with the Second Department cases cited by the Special Referee clearly rejecting any such toll *(see also, Espy v Giorlando,*85 AD2d 652, *affd*56 NY2d 640; *Maldonado v Long Is. Jewish Med. Center,*156 AD2d 431; *3191 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 308.13a; Siegel, NY Prac § 72 [2d ed]; *but see,*McLaughlin, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C308:2, at 303). There is no merit to any suggestion by plaintiff that the actual receipt of process excuses a failure to serve it in conformity with statute *(Feinstein v Bergner,*48 NY2d 234, 241). In view of the foregoing, it is unnecessary to review the IAS court’s finding of fact, also contrary to the recommendation of the Special Referee, that the process was delivered to a person of suitable age and discretion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Smith, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
              FROM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONDENSED
              CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND NOTES TO CONDENSED
              CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
              ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          24,638
<SECURITIES>                                    31,591
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                       726
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,562
<PP&E>                                          34,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,790
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,885
<SALES>                                         81,841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,841
<CGS>                                            3,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,536 <F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,053 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (755)<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,102
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,766
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,336
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,336
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
<FN>
<F1>MINORITY INTEREST SHARE OF NET INCOME AND LOSS ON EQUITY JOINT VENTURES
<F2>REPRESENTS NET INTEREST INCOME
<F3>INCLUDES RESTRUCTURING CHARGES OF 5,561,000 (.23 PER DILUTED SHARE)
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21. Subsidiaries of Registrant (2)

                                                            Percentage of Voting
                                                            Securities of Sub-
                                                            sidiaries Owned by
                                 Place of                   Registrant as of
Name (1)                       Incorporation                December 31, 2000

B-R Holdings, Inc.               Virginia                         100%

Charles Burton Builder, Inc.     Maryland                         100%

Ft. Hill Manager, Inc.           Virginia                         100%

Investment Company of
B & R, Inc.                      Delaware                         100%

Sudley Corporation               Virginia                         100%

Town Center                      District of
Management Corp.                 Columbia                         100%

WMC Management Co., Inc.         District of
                                 Columbia                         100%

(1) The names of certain subsidiaries have been omitted because, considered in
the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they do not constitute a significant
subsidiary.

(2) Included in the consolidated financial statements as significant
subsidiaries.
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00066]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Government-Owned Inventions; Available 
for Licensing

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the United States 
Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and are 
available for licensing by the Department of the Navy.
    The following patents are available for licensing: Patent 
application 12/650,413: Finite State Machine Architecture for Software 
Development (a system for developing an application program having 
functionality that corresponds to a finite state machine model)//U.S. 
Patent No. 8,238,924: Real-Time Optimization of Allocation of 
Resources//U.S. Patent No. 7,685,207: Adaptive Web-Based Asset Control 
System.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the patents cited should be directed 
to Office of Counsel, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code 
OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface 
Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 
47522-5001, telephone (812) 854-4100.

    Authority:  35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

    Dated: December 31, 2012.
C. K. Chiappetta,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-00066 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P