Tilegel procedures * STATES Ex BIT A STATES o@aInAt

ARSWER]- WAIVER OF CeNSTITUTLOMATK RIGHTS, AG REEMEST TO
STI PALATE, AND suviciAL Cod PESSION > Nh, O2¥SS308 —~ THIS
. * ;

: WAIVER 1s / LeGALS For, Absolude rigkts Cannot be .
waived ever pity onset; implementation of those
eights is not optional and Cearot be waived of Llitedl
Kieseh nick v. Stabe, 9) S02d (Sle. therefore‘ this fraud-

-u leathy signes| waiver, is VoID om its face ~ Oherzas;

the ONLY evidence in the trial Court Ptcords, /s tis
d Exhibit A, ‘sTATreS AISPER |] “sual royal donfession’—P lease saz,
hallore v. State, 59S So2d 862, at B64L11 “TF His
eSudieial emfession was the enly widence in the record,
we wold heve fo emelude that tHe cviderce was jn-

- sufficient fo sustain a Cnvickion... Exhibit A zof

Le © STATES ORGINAL ANSOER , is a freudulertly ercatzc)
govern mental clooumant . Ass “strTes ExHBIT Dp” will shad—
Entry No. MI, om this L Herris Covaty Crim (nal District Docket
Sheak] (somes ExkibstD’, cleecly shoos that ‘deFordant
Ruthin Dehnathen appcectol wdhat ewnsel—" this is a
Facgeo! govern mental caterd ; create! £6 harm +his

dicFanol ext 5 by claiming dhe defendant was bec Ne

|


(CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

xz, sehnethen Kun Wes No. (514680 do Neereby Ceen FY
thet Q TRUE. AND Cokker Cop £ “Hop lreark’ Origine
“Ov jectin de Undeit stote habeas detim’” has been,
Lhis dey , sank fo: L488 District Gort & Harris Cooney Texas
via Howcts caroty Distt Clerk— Cheis Daviel/Po. Boy 4esi/

ston Teds W2l0-YW5I 5 US. Kest-olass prepaid postese

via prise meil ba deposited — .

Exceeded his [3th Sig nQhmbfa, RUB

L Anal 2015 — Dehnethen'Rullin 4/4) 4680
dey ? Pebstirar Qe Se


Mlesally amFoing the defendant using Froudulertly
ecaeted govern martel Pecoris3 end, Lnctrective assistance:

of ewnselL Sez, Ex porte Meadows, 78 S24 lolol — Danial
ok areusad’s eight fo conse! of clractive aio of counsel
sanders Cmuiction yoid----] must be provide! fo Hee’
Ackndent , dy haw and @rotected by fhe Texas Cnst-
~ duion , US, Constitictiona | Arrands, le, }4~ Sax, hae WLS,
322 F.2d MO- A dekndart has an absolute aght+ to
dounsel, ---- and such cight fo cunsel rs so Lindamente|
to oluc process that i#is obligatory vfon the states boy
the Fourteenth Amend men € ~ AND; This is the |
feason shy foe 248% Vistrick lock of Hecris.
county , Te exas Aanied His Applicat a Por enol
unbiased LVe4C.c P Acticle il.07 | Texés SmrTE habees

Corpus proceed iag.> in Cor werk ing everything fo He
Court oF CRM nA APPEALS OF TEXAS, withat He full
oak Foie processes EVIDENTIARY HEARING wert rs
viseovesy_] duc 4 hebzes proceeding Applicant Krew
Lhe TRIAL CORT wold act weat all the eget actions ;


who executed Lis. document,“ WAIVER oF Cons TUT lonAL
RIGHTS, AGREEMENT To STPPULATE,, AD TWD CARL Con Fession” — This:
is a eciminel act 2° Texas Penal Code § 37, 0 “Tampering
prt, Governmental Record’ Cd (3) — This Fraudulant

Gavarn wank Document damonstrates the Cs Huston used
Jo deny tha defordent his* Absolute cight £ Uited
STares GonsnTuTion, Article mm - “the Trial £ ail limes, --

_ shatl be by Ducyj--a] +o trial by Darcy 5 and , Coonsel &
ailawe fo secure and coker thet “Abse lucke eight” is
fo be tacfective — Sez, Kagler v, State, Ilo 503A 108,
at UW L341 Te gene 8 prea wes involuntary because of

inchlectve assistance of dwnsel,--- by causing hin to
give vp his vight to 2 Ariel - This damn strates Gunsels
—rnefrectiveness as Ackorlents Om stiechionetly protected

~ etght do awasel — Strickland, Yolo US. + 688-92, 104 S.C.
g052— This Guviction. aennot legally be aaforeeol:
and, MUST be overturned _ -

| (oN¢LUsION

Duc fo these instencaS &% ne avidence fo sustain
d amutction, Oollaston fo Cause Yocm fe deKaderty



“and rarberrosetorias that ConVleT los! SHILL BE MADE
NULL AWD VOID s celeasing Applicant Hearectter As this
Aoplicert hes denon streted Controverbed facts phat ace
\isted herein this moTion swith desc lad provided demen-
~streting his Cosvictiow Ard Sarrevee is VoID et i715 PACER
Aap licent PRAYS Lhis Cover will tele wonce of HIs
FUNDAM EMTAL MISCARRIAGE oF Justice ANd chusE fl
OOERS» SUA Slows TE; FRom THIS CouRT TO REMEDY THIS

OPPORUWITY for smTe of TeV4s" 298% Distucr CATES
ERRORS of FEDEPAL AA) AND CONSTITUTIONAL AM NDS —

Executed Lhis /3% “Respartlally Subnitted,
Pal, ule

ley of Roa dis — Dohnathan Ruffin, #14] He80

Pebtionar ore SZ

INMAME Dee4RATIoN
(28 use $ 1N%>

ZZ, Tohnethan RudfinH#/9/4eGo. do hereby DECLARE, uncler —
penalty & pecjury thet query thing in Phis MoThon) 1s TRUE

AWD CORRECT, > He best & my dalief—

Signe

O16? Cover oF ChiminAt APPEALS Johnathan Rufkin #191 HoF6
Ob: 24s Disecr ewer of Hares DELLARANT savert So

Co. TAS) via Haris to. Dismtier ¢Lerc

Beez file —-elerol Notice



io, 83 jo Q0- 02

ine § dime ape
Dehnathan Ruin, oF
905 No. [9/4080 g count SEER
& APR 17 2015

Aoplicants Original “Objection fo Yntai coe posal dheas
gution ; ‘pacsuant bo WA EUR, Ark 07 , 45-64. Cop sr.
Amend. 1,14; Denial & Hecess L Gucts and Eqval Protection

TO THE HoNo@ABlLE JUSTICES of CouRrT of CeIMiINAL ATPEALS oF TEXAS +
(mes Nd, Do hnathan Ru Ein #191 +080 5 whom is Nor AV
- ATTORNEY; Yet, wishes Lhis Cort fo Vid Lhis Morro4 Tikerally ,
Construea in pettioet pro ses faves. See, Haines Vo Ker res,
Yo¥ H-$. 519, 92 5. 4- S94, 30 L. Gal. td O52 —
habeas Cet action
This Applicant, Tohnathen Puffin, #/9/ C80 5 comes to
Lhe 2484 Sidiciol Distiel Gort of Harris co.,Texas wilh
Lis Listont hebeas aotien, Ceuse o- 137832L-A — G led
& merch 2015, wi, Pra Harris co, District Clerk- Cher
Den iol / Jeo! Frenin -P-0. Bex Hos / flv ston Taras 9210-45 | —



with the caverse) 6 Convicrion and Sartnee; ex posec!
in He 248% District Guct of Hervis ewnty Texas. Sos
tHe Applicant wont Presocd , beOce his Lime ran wt, anf
Filed his federel C28 UeS.¢.§ 2254) habees corpus inthe
US District Cock Gr the Sovlharn District of Texas, af
Housron), Texas Cause no, 4:)S-ev- 00531 = Trae 4 jhe
Lorn; the 2088 District Cuct tries fy ciceumvert He
Lui and Fair \ebeas Peocess ot he STATE of TOMS.
PRAVER | . }
Applicant, Dohnathan Rubin TCT to. 1914680 SPRAYS Lis

Cover tole NoTce of this Judicial erro 5 enol, GRANT
this. Abe Vicant his full end fecr state hobeas Corpus 9 O-
| ~ teed ing with camend becle+-o trie] aut well, Losreucy ions
Shexe TNSTONT IONS sHatl THCUDE, but not Wnited fp «

Fall enol Farr Evidentiary Hear ing wth Abppeintmart &
Cwnsel $Distorery process goth no limitetions upon the

 Aaplicents requests 5 ORDERING He 248 District
Cover > 4pen Completion & neering, chape sitions, affiolesits,


TRIAL Covet GNDINGS

Parsuat to VALLE, Article 1/01; All habees corpus
Issues must be resolved! in the Trial Guct, before Fadl ings
of Fact ton be resolved wih eeeommandations beeing ;
Cocinarclea in Lye rato! to fhe = COUT oF CRM rat APFERLS
oF TAS Inte Applicants instent, no, 1378326-4 C2¥e4
District Lock £ Harris e0.,Texes), habeas action ; Lene are
many Prasioasty unresolved Fads material lo the legally A
Applicant's londioa mart — tn which , these contro verted
jssues nacd Io ba cesolvedd in Le Trial Cwrt via mideits,
depositions, infer goter (as, 2nd an widertiayy heecing; fora
full ond Lair right do petitiin Lhe coorts U5. CAL
Conse AMeses. IF

STATES ORIGINAL ANSWER

the Stake word he aeryonte belicucs by rts mare
Conclusion, sot Feebel evidence of any Kind 5 tat Cnnorsel
was elfective for the Applicat /Dekerdat— Hadaxer 5 jn

te Smpre's oRGINAL ANSHSER , phere the STHTE provided

EX BITS, For the Covet THESE exthBiTs sHow


i's frying fo get his ome “bike A the apple’ Faicly 5 widest
9 “soo ot callgen apple? No culing has been condered om
“Aeplicertts Original Obyection.-- andl ORVeRr 5 unless one
wold cont He auto metic forwarding o& habeas procendings
as & Ay sexe bifhin Lhis Appl feanks Ob {eehin 5 he
cequests tHe Cllasing < , 7 .
Deridenbiagy hearing 2) Discaery Grocess 2) Production
and Inspection J veetous ‘ceports and notes wef ort minutes
4) Trial lat Trensecipt, ard other Goer retors —memo's 5) Doamen—
~bary wiidence: and Vaitieetion Hf Aethercily te
| Nothing has heen properly observeal in this habees atin:
ony, that being how Lhis 9p licat has shasa Chy He
STHTIES aw enpaice) phe illegality of his confinemart ‘if wher
the 2488 5D.L. Was Caused yon 25 Mech 2015, his habeas
| action fo be foewerlea| fo He wer oF Cmulac AMP ERLE of
exts , withosr appWicarts “Ob yectiin fo STHTES FiNDINGS’ being
cule vem — Aap heat deseribes the “Cnteoveaed FAS",
tat justice dlemarcls a full and fair evidentiary heecing ancl
| Diseorery ProcwsS F vthin this of, SET ion , that mens
witha Sudgenant cendereel or Dyinion hereto — |


|. The (STATE'S 0RGWAt ANSWER ; of /'7 Maret Zs jas
misenstrucd Claims & Aiaplicents 3 witha chance to
Cocraet — Win bese pepars/docemants ; the STATE
ineluokes Ombrnetted issues dno facts , which &s elaimecf
be he documarted “alidere’ fr phe STATE Here dre.
Cmbrorerted Facts, that tre uncesolved Fackiel basis
Ce Lye “legality & the applicant's Carbinement? 5 whieh i
ceasen for 4 full end feir ahdentiary heering’ need —
AALANTS OBSETION

Applicant's “Ob jection ce STATE'S PloSED FINDIES of FACT.
Executed on 24 Mach 2015, aaposited in pisen metl bex; wih,
Cicst-oless postege pe-paid on seme olay 5 has notqewen had 4
jadsemané Radered vpon id, before the COO RTS OLDER
fo fee ward to: Cooer oF CRuAlAc APES oF TEAS THUS,
Causing unfe/pra\udicial treetmant fosrect-this
App Ieant ~ SHE of TEXAS habeas Corpus peo ested ings ,
VALLE, at 1107, damend a feic, unbiesel, oc preyudiciel
Pp ocecdings SUN eKamining the lowkellness and LHe

legalit, & the Opp hicantts Cm Frac ment this Opp hicart