alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0489 Directorate ID: 2008-SW-003-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model 206L-3 and 206L-4 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 525 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to alert pilots to avoid certain engine speeds during 

steady-state operations, prevent failure of the third stage engine turbine, engine power loss, and 

subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $20 for the decal

Labor per Helicopter

(0.5 work-hour x 

$85/work-hour to update 

the RFM)

(0.2 work-hour x 

$85/work-hour to install 

the decal)

$43

$17

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $80

Total US Fleet Cost $42,000

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Chinh Vuong
April 1, 2015

STATE OF MINNESOTA 

IN SUPREME COURT 

A15-0350 

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against 

Philip Jay Elbert, a Minnesota Attorney, 

Registration No. 293891. 

ORDER 

Omc.:OF 

APPB.I!AJECn, rD"'r«: 

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition 

for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Philip Jay Elbert committed professional 

misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, failing to maintain custody over and 

disseminating confidential materials obtained during discovery in a criminal proceeding, 

in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.4(c) and 8.4(d). 

Respondent now waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers 

Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and unconditionally admits the allegations of the 

petition. In a stipulation for discipline, the parties jointly recommend that the appropriate 

discipline is a 30-day suspension. 

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly 

recommended disposition. 

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Respondent Philip Jay Elbert is suspended from the practice of law for a 

minimum of 30 days, effective 14 days from the date of the filing of this order; 

1 
2. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of 

suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals); 

3. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR; 

4. Respondent shall be eligible for reinstatement to the practice of law 

following the expiration of the suspension period provided that, not less than 15 days 

before the end of the suspension period, respondent files with the Clerk of Appellate 

Courts and serves upon the Director an affidavit establishing that he is current in 

continuing legal education requirements, has complied ~ith Rules 24 and 26, RLPR, and 

has complied with any other conditions for reinstatement imposed by the court; and 

5. Within l year of the date of the filing of this order, respondent shall file 

with the Clerk of Appellate Courts and serve upon the Director proof of successful 

completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Failure 

to timely file the required documentation shall result in automatic re-suspension, as 

provided in Rule 18(eX3), RLPR. 

Dated: April I, 2015 

BY THE COURT: 

Associate Justice 

2
SHARES

PINNACLE AIRLINES CORP.

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 


CUSIP

SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 


This
is to Certify that 


is
the owner of 


FULLY
PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK



$0.01
PAR VALUE PER SHARE OF PINNACLE AIRLINES CORP. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney, on surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 


        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed in facsimile by its duly authorized officers and the facsimile seal of the Corporation to be duly affixed
hereto. 


Dated:



Countersigned
and Registered:

U.S. BANK, N.A.

(Milwaukee, WI) 


Transfer
Agent

and Registrar

By

Authorized Signature 


PRESIDENT &
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 


VICE
PRESIDENT & CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 






PINNACLE
AIRLINES CORP. 


        The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations: 


TEN
COM

TEN ENT

JT TEN 


as
tenants in common

as tenants by the entireties

as joint tenants with right of

survivorship and not as tenants

in common 



	UNIF GIFT MIN ACTD	 	Custodian	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	(Cust)	 	 
	(Minor)	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
	 	 	 	 	 	 	(State)





        Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED,
                                         
       hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 


PLEASE
INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 



Please
print or typewrite name and address including postal zip code of assignee. 


shares 


of
the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 


Attorney



to
transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises. 


Dated            .



NOTICE:



THE
SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 



SIGNATURE(S)
GUARANTEED: 


        THE
SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. 


        KEEP
THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN, OR DESTROYED, THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND OF INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION OF THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATE.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





The undersigned, Jeffrey A. Gould, does hereby certify to his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 of the registrant:





(1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.








Date: May 15,  2020/s/ Jeffrey A. GouldJeffrey A. GouldPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (No. 333 79547) on Form S-8 of Bridgford FoodsCorporation of our report dated January 12, 2007, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Bridgford Foods Corporation as of November 3,2006 and October 28, 2005, and the related statements of operations,shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for the fiscalyears ended November 3, 2006 and October 28, 2005, and the related financialstatement schedule, which report appears in the November 3, 2006 annual reporton Form 10-K of Bridgford Foods Corporation.
|                         | **/s/  Haskell & White LLP** |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------|
| ** **              |
| ** **              |
| **Irvine,  California** |
| **January  31, 2007**   |

 

1

----
Order entered February 26, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01356-CV

STEVE HENSON, M.D. AND DAVID K. HENSON, Appellants

V.

GRUBER HURST JOHANSEN HAIL SHANK, LLP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-00553

ORDER

We GRANT the February 13, 2015 motion of G. Kevin Buchanan to withdraw as 

counsel for appellants. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to remove G. Kevin Buchanan with 

the law firm of Kevin Buchanan & Associates, P.L.L.C. as counsel for appellants. 

Appellants are now appearing before this Court pro se. Appellants’ brief is due March 9, 

2015.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 10(c)  


 Consent of Independent Accountants  


        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Illini Corporation relating to the issuance of
securities in the proposed merger of Illinois Community Bancorp, Inc. into Effingham Merger Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Illini Corporation, of our report dated February 22,
2002, on the consolidated financial statements of Illinois Community Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended. We also consent to the reference to our firm
appearing under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus. 




BKD, LLP

May 3, 2002

 


Decatur,
Illinois 


110
CAUSE NO. 01-15-00124-CV

SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. § IN THE 1st COURT OF APPEALS

§

VS. §

§

SOUTHWEST PIPE §

SERVICES, INC. AND §

JOE BRIERS §

DEFENDANTS’, SOUTHWEST PIPE SERVICES, INC. AND JOE BRIERS 

NOTICE OF PAYMENT OF CLERK’S RECORD

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW, Defendants, Southwest Pipe Services, Inc and Joe Briers, and files 

this their proof of payment for the Clerk’s Record. 

The Clerks Record was paid for on April 12, 2015 in the amount of $209.00.

Respectfully submitted,

 JASON A. POWERS, ATTORNEY

_________________________________

Jason A. Powers

SBOT 24027745

PO Box 272425

Houston, Texas 77277

Tele: (832) 647-8493

Fax: (832) 415-0593

jason@jasonapowers.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on April 12, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

instrument has been sent to all counsel of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil 

Procedure.

ACCEPTED

01-15-00124-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/12/2015 11:46:58 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/13/2015 7:11:00 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
 

_________________________________

Jason A. Powers
#### In the Matter of Akeem L., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Respondent.

—Order, Family Court, New York County (Michael Gage, J.), entered on or about April 20, 1990, which granted respondent’s motion to suppress physical evidence, and which dismissed the juvenile delinquency petition against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

At about 11:30 p.m., shortly after the arresting officers received a radio run that there had been a robbery of a taxicab by five men approximately ten blocks away, they observed respondent and a companion in a taxicab. Although the location was purportedly an area which has a high incidence of such robberies, no unusual activity was exhibited, other than the fact that respondent, one of two passengers, looked at one of the officers and then slid down on the seat of the cab, covering his face with his hands. The cab was stopped, the respondent and the other passenger ordered to step out, and a firearm was discovered on the back seat.

The tape of the radio run concerning the robbery was destroyed before it could be disclosed. We disagree with the Family Court that the destruction of the tape justified precluding any testimony or evidence concerning the radio run. The tape’s production would not have been required as the statement of a presentment agency witness pursuant to *People v Rosario*(9 NY2d 286, *cert denied*368 US 866), because the sending officer’s testimony was not required *(People v Petralia,*62 NY2d 47, *cert denied*469 US 852), and because there was no evidence that the arresting officers had made statements on the tape that related to the subject of their testimony *(People v Butler,*33 AD2d 675, *affd*28 NY2d 499). Production was not required pursuant to *Brady v Maryland*(373 US 83), on the ground that it was exculpatory, in that the tape would *438have indicated that the radio run had concerned Hispanics, while the juvenile is apparently a light-skinned Afro-American. It was not seriously disputed that the tape contained a reference to Hispanics, and thus the tape would not have controverted any of the evidence at the hearing.

Nonetheless, the record supports the Family Court’s conclusion that no reasonable suspicion justified the stop of the cab. The radio run did not contain a specific description that was matched by the cab or its occupants *(cf., People v Ochsner,*159 AD2d 435, *lv denied*76 NY2d 740). Neither the fact that the cab was in a high-crime area at night *(see, People v Brown,*112 AD2d 945, *amended*114 AD2d 417), nor did the allegedly furtive gestures of sliding down on the back seat of the cab and covering the face with hands create a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity *(People v Rossetti,*148 AD2d 357).

Accordingly, the record supports the Family Court’s decision to suppress the weapon. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
FEDERAL-STATE SHIPPING POINT INSPECTION SERVICE 

LICENSEE’S PERFORMANCE RATING 

IMPORTANT: Before completing this form, refer to the Federal and Federal-State Shipping Point and Cooperative Market Supervisors’ Manual 

NAME (LAST, FIRST, M.I.): 

ADDRESS: E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

LICENSE TYPE & NUMBER: RATING PERIOD: 

☐ SC-200 ☐ SC-201 

STATE EMPLOYED: DATE OF LAST RATING: 

PRODUCTS INSPECTED (DURING RATING PERIOD): 

RATING INFORMATION 

KNOWLEDGE OF PRODUCTS COOPERATION JUDGEMENT 

ATTITUDE TACT FINAL GRADE 

PERSONALITY DO YOU RECOMMEND RE-EMPLOYMENT? SUPERVISORY POTENTIAL 

☐ YES 

☐ NO 

IF “NO,” EXPLAIN UNDER REMARKS 

☐ YES 

☐ NO 

☐ TOO EARLY TO DETERMINE 

REMARKS 

SIGNATURE OF FEDERAL PROGRAM MANAGER/STATE SUPERVISOR/DESIGNEE DATE: 

SC-293 (11-21) Previous editions are to be destroyed. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Bryan Steam Corporation and its subsidiaries as of
June 30, 1997, and the related  consolidated  condensed income statement for the
year then ended,  and is  qualified in its entirety by reference to such audited
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000014971
<NAME>                        Bryan Steam Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         368,879
<SECURITIES>                                   1,466,686
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,832,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                   17,372
<INVENTORY>                                    4,479,203
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,439,685
<PP&E>                                         8,976,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,400,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,222,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,448,329
<BONDS>                                        90,240
<COMMON>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    810,272
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,222,769
<SALES>                                        26,232,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               26,559,510
<CGS>                                          20,212,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,674,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               77
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             88,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,580,968
<INCOME-TAX>                                   971,953
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,609,015
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,609,015
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  8.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  8.41
        


</TABLE>
Exhibt 3ii


                  STATEMENT OF UNANIMOUS CONSENT
                    OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                                OF
                    CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION


          The undersigned members of the Board of Directors of Chase General
Corporation, a Missouri corporation (the "Corporation"), being all of the
directors of the Corporation, do hereby consent to the adoption of, and do
hereby adopt, the following resolutions.

          RESOLVED, that Article III, Section Two of the Bylaws be amended to
     change the number of directors of the Corporation from five to three.

          FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Corporation be, and each
     hereby is, authorized and directed to execute, acknowledge, deliver,
     file and record a Statement of Change in Number of Directors with the
     Missouri Secretary of State and to take such other action and execute
     and deliver such other instruments as the officer so acting deems
     necessary or appropriate to effect the change in the number of directors
     of the Corporation.


Dated:    January 19, 1996.


                                     /s/ Barry M. Yantis         
                                   Barry M. Yantis


                                     /s/ Brian A. Yantis         
                                   Brian A. Yantis


                                     /s/ W.A. Yantis, III
                                   W.A. Yantis, III
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00009-CV

Alvin Dwayne Street

v.

Virginia Vanegas Underbrink

On Appeal from the

347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2014-FAM-5954-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 9, 2015
Exhibit 10.22


                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                               ------------------
                               SEVERANCE AGREEMENT
                               -------------------

         This FIRST AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT (this "First Amendment") is
made and entered into as of this 29th day of April, 2002 and amends that certain
Severance Agreement (the "Agreement") effective as of January 1, 2002 by and
between HEALTH & NUTRITION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Florida corporation
("HNS", or the "COMPANY") and STEVEN POMERANTZ, an individual ("Pomerantz").

         Terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings given
them in the Agreement

         WHEREAS, the parties to the Agreement desire to amend such Agreement as
set forth in this First Amendment.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and mutual
covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

                                    ARTICLE I

         1. Section 3.3 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read
as follows:


         "The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that (i) the Company owes
Pomerantz $23,443 for base salary and bonus accrued but not paid during the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2001 (the "Back Pay") and (ii) Employer shall
pay to Employee the Back Pay in twelve equal monthly installments of $1,953.58
commencing May 1, 2002."

         2. All other terms and provisions of the Agreement remain in full force
and effect.

         3. This First Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts.
All executed counterparts shall constitute one agreement notwithstanding that
all signatories are not signatories to the original or the same counterpart.



                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the HNS and Pomerantz have executed this First
Amendment to Severance Agreement as of the day and year first above written.



                                 HEALTH & NUTRITION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                 By:   /s/Christopher Tisi
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                 Name: Christopher Tisi
                                 Title:







                                 /s/Steven Pomerantz
                                 ---------------------------------------------
                                 Steve Pomerantz




                                       2
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: April 16, 2015 D-25-15 

 

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN

VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW

§ 468-a.

COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STANDARDS, ON MOTION

Petitioner;

SCOTT RANDALL ROTMAN,

Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 2762391)

 

Calendar Date: March 24, 2014

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Garry and Lynch, JJ.

 

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards,

Albany, for petitioner.

Scott Randall Rotman, Newfoundland, New Jersey, respondent

pro se.

 

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in

1996, was suspended by this Court's order dated January 30, 2014

for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements

of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he

has complied with the attorney registration requirements of

Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of
-2- D-25-15 

the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object

to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered

reinstated, effective immediately.

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Garry and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is

further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and

counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>   1



                                                                  EXHIBIT 23(ii)

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-57577) of
Borden, Inc. and Affiliates of our reports dated February 16, 1995, except as
to paragraph 1 of Note 1, the second sentence of paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 of
Note 11, which are as of March 15, 1995, appearing on page 66 of this Form 10-K
of this Form 10-K. We have not audited the combined financial statements of
Borden, Inc. and Affiliates for any period subsequent to December 31, 1994.


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Columbus, Ohio
March 17, 1997

                                       87