alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO.

COURT OF APPEALS NO. 03-14-00236-CR

IN THE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

KEVIN TODD HARDIN,

Appellant/Petitioner

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee/Respondent

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 17 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

FILED IN

On appeal from the Third Court of AppealspOURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAI S

Austin, Texas

APR 17 2015

MOTION TO SUSPEND RULE 9.3(b), Abel Acosta, Clerk

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

NOW COMES, KEVIN TODD HARDIN, Appellant/Petitioner in the

above styled and numbered cause and moves the Court to suspend

Rule 9.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In support of this motion Petitioner shows the Court as follows:

I.

Petitioner is currently incarcerated in the Mark W. Michael

Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional

Division in Tennessee Colony, Texas.
II.

Rule 9.3(b) states in pertinent part: "A party must file the

original and 11 copies of any document addressed to...the Court of

Criminal Appeals..." See Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule

9.3(b).

III.

Due to Petitioner's current incarceration, he is unable to

duplicate any documents because he does not have access to a copy

machine.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Kevin Todd Hardin respect

fully requests that this Court suspend.Rule 9.3(b) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure in this case and permit him to file

only the original of his Petition for Discretionary Review.

Respectfully espectruiiy submitted, submittec

KEVIN TODD HARDIN

PETITIONER

TDCJ No. 1920319

Mark W. Michael Unit

2664 FM 2054

Tennessee Colony, Texas 75886

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the fore

going motion has been served by placing same in the United States

Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to: Burnet County District At

torney's Office, P.O. Box 725, Llano, Texas 78643 and State Prose

cuting Attorney, P.O. Box 13046, Austin, Texas 78711-3046 on this

KEVIN TODD HARDIN
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63
      of
      Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Finlay
      Enterprises, Inc., (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended November
      3,
      2007 (the “Report”) that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the SecuritiesExchange
                Act of 1934; and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financialcondition
                and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
      December 13, 2007




/s/
                Arthur E. Reiner
              
              Arthur
                E. Reiner
              Chairman,
                President and Chief Executive
                Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
      States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
      disclosure document.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 192 (Thursday, October 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 61321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24236]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 192 / Thursday, October 3, 2013 / 
Notices

[[Page 61321]]

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION

Board of Directors Executive Session Meeting

    Meeting: African Development Foundation, Board of Directors 
Executive Session Meeting
    Time: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Place: 1400 Eye Street NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005
    Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2013
    Status:

1. Open session, Tuesday, October 22, 2013, 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
2. Closed session, Tuesday, October 22, 2013, 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Shari Berenbach,
President/CEO, USADF.
[FR Doc. 2013-24236 Filed 10-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6117-01-P
```
#### Barbara STAMBAUGH, personal representative of the Estate of Jody Stambaugh, Deceased, Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA and State of Alaska, Appellees.

No. 3093.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Nov. 25, 1977.

W. G. Ruddy, Robertson, Monagle, Eas-taugh & Bradley, Juneau, for appellant.

Henry J. Camarot, Merdes, Schaible, Sta-ley & DeLisio, Inc., Anchorage, for appellee Univ. of Alaska.

*265Robert L. Eastaugh and James J. Delaney, Delaney, Wiles, Moore, Hayes & Reit-man, Inc., Anchorage, for appellee State of Alaska.

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NO WITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal comes to us following denial of appellant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, in an action for wrongful death. The sole issue on appeal is whether the superior court erred in refusing such relief.

Under our established standard of review, as enunciated in *Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. Peck,*520 P.2d 87, 92 (Alaska 1974), we hold that there was no error. The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


     As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report included in this Form 10-K, into Tom Brown, Inc.'s
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 Nos. 33-42991, 33-44225,
33-60191, 33-60842, 33-13157, 33-30069, 33-42011, 333-56577, 333-69353,
333-31426, 333-89031, and 333-89033.



                                          WILLIAMSON PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.


March 17, 2000
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART TWO

NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP OF THE UNION

NON-DISCRIMINATION AND CITIZENSHIP OF THE UNION

Article 25

(ex Article 22 TEC)

(ex Article 22 TEC)

The Commission shall report to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Economic and Social Committee every three years on the application of the provisions of this Part. This report shall take account of the development of the Union.

On this basis, and without prejudice to the other provisions of the Treaties, the Council, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may adopt provisions to strengthen or to add to the rights listed in Article 20(2). These provisions shall enter into force after their approval by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION FOR THE FIFTY-TWO WEEKS
ENDED OCTOBER 29, 1999 AS SET FORTH IN ITS 10-K FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-29-1999
<CASH>                                      25,020,839
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,336,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                   647,219
<INVENTORY>                                 16,149,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            57,236,926
<PP&E>                                      48,298,517
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,533,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              85,469,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,476,726
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,426,695
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,708,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                85,469,476
<SALES>                                    138,786,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           138,786,260
<CGS>                                       80,544,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               80,544,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            42,072,646
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               221,650
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             369,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,169,505
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,145,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,024,505
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,024,505
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87


</TABLE>
Power of Attorney


 

 Exhibit 10 (vi)

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY: FEDERAL, SECURITIES LAWS

 

The Undersigned, Marc Racicot, a member of the Board of Directors of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (“MassMutual”), does hereby constitute and
appoint Lawrence V. Burkett, .Jr., Richard M. Howe, Stephen R. Bosworth, and Michael Berenson, and each of them individually, as his true and lawful attorneys and agents.

 

Such attorneys and agents shall have full power of substitution and authority to take any and all action and execute any and all instruments on the Undersigned’s
behalf as a member of the Board of Directors of MassMutual said attorneys and agents may deem necessary or advisable to enable MassMutual to comply with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (collectively, the “Acts”) and any rules, regulations, orders or other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) thereunder. This Power of Attorney
authorizes such attorneys and agents to sign the Undersigned’s name on his behalf as a member of the Board of Directors of MassMutual to any and all registration statements and/or amendments thereto, reports, instruments or documents filed or
to be filed with the Commission under the Acts. Without limiting the scope of this Power of Attorney, it shall apply to filings by or on behalf of MassMutual separate investment accounts currently in existence or established in the future, including
but not limited to those listed below.

 


		 Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 1





		 Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 2





		 Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 3





		 Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 4





		 Massachusetts Mutual Variable Life Separate Account I





		 Massachusetts Mutual Variable Life Separate Account 11





		 Massachusetts Mutual Variable Life Separate Account 111





		 Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Fund 1





		 Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Fund 2





		 Panorama Separate Account





		 Connecticut Mutual Variable Life Separate Account I





		 CML Variable Annuity Account A





		 CML Variable Annuity Account B





		 CML Accumulation Annuity Account E





		 CML/OFFITBANK Separate Account




 

The Undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorneys and agents shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Undersigned has set his hand this 14th day of February, 2002.

 


	 /s/    Marc Racicot




Marc Racicot

Member, Board of Directors

		 /s/ Judith M. Schilling


 Witness
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE X

SOCIAL POLICY

SOCIAL POLICY

Article 151

(ex Article 136 TEC)

(ex Article 136 TEC)

The Union and the Member States, having in mind fundamental social rights such as those set out in the European Social Charter signed at Turin on 18 October 1961 and in the 1989 Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers, shall have as their objectives the promotion of employment, improved living and working conditions, so as to make possible their harmonisation while the improvement is being maintained, proper social protection, dialogue between management and labour, the development of human resources with a view to lasting high employment and the combating of exclusion.

To this end the Union and the Member States shall implement measures which take account of the diverse forms of national practices, in particular in the field of contractual relations, and the need to maintain the competitiveness of the Union economy.

They believe that such a development will ensue not only from the functioning of the internal market, which will favour the harmonisation of social systems, but also from the procedures provided for in the Treaties and from the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 3420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00836]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9770-5]

Office of Environmental Information; Announcement of Availability 
and Comment Period for the Draft Quality Standard for Environmental 
Data Collection, Production, and Use by Non-EPA (External) 
Organizations and Two Associated QA Handbooks; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability & request for comment; extension of 
comment period and correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency published a document in 
the Federal Register of December 26, 2012, concerning request for 
comments for the Draft Quality Standard for Environmental Data 
Collection, Production, and Use by Non-EPA (External) Organizations and 
two associated QA Handbooks. The notice of availability is being 
extended to a 45 day review and comment period and the document 
contained incorrect Web site links in the footnotes.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 11, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Warren, Environmental Protection 
Agency; 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, MC 2811R; Washington, DC 20460; 
Phone: 202-564-6876.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 26, 2012 in FRL 9764-3, page 
76035, second column correct line after SUMMARY to read:

``SUMMARY: Notice of availability for a 45 day review and comment 
period is hereby given for the draft Quality Standard for 
Environmental Data Collection, Production, and Use by Non-EPA 
(External) Organizations and two associated draft QA Handbooks; 1) 
draft Handbook for Preparing Quality Management Plans (QMPs) and 2) 
draft Handbook for Preparing Quality Assurance (QA) Project Plans 
(QAPPs).''

    In the Federal Register of December 26, 2012 in FRL 9764-3, on page 
76036, at the bottom of the first column; correct the Web site 
references for footnotes one and two to read:

\1\ http://www.epa.gov/irmpoli8/policies/21050.pdf
\2\ http://www.epa.gov/irmpoli8/policies/21060.pdf

Monica D. Jones,
Director, Quality Staff.
[FR Doc. 2013-00836 Filed 1-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
RICHARD DANIEL VAUGHN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-122

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 14, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

William F. Stone, Judge.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Michael J. Titus, 

Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil 

Regional Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Giselle Denise Lylen, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, CLARK, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE II

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

Article 24

1.   By way of derogation from Article 305, first paragraph, of the TFEU establishing the maximum number of members of the Committee of the Regions, Article 8 of the Protocol on transitional provisions, annexed to the TEU, the TFEU and the EAEC Treaty, shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 8

Until the entry into force of the decision referred to in Article 305 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the allocation of members of the Committee of the Regions shall be as follows:

| Belgium | 12 |
| --- | --- |
| Bulgaria | 12 |
| Czech Republic | 12 |
| Denmark | 9 |
| Germany | 24 |
| Estonia | 7 |
| Ireland | 9 |
| Greece | 12 |
| Spain | 21 |
| France | 24 |
| Croatia | 9 |
| Italy | 24 |
| Cyprus | 6 |
| Latvia | 7 |
| Lithuania | 9 |
| Luxembourg | 6 |
| Hungary | 12 |
| Malta | 5 |
| Netherlands | 12 |
| Austria | 12 |
| Poland | 21 |
| Portugal | 12 |
| Romania | 15 |
| Slovenia | 7 |
| Slovakia | 9 |
| Finland | 9 |
| Sweden | 12 |
| United Kingdom | 24’ |

Belgium

12

Bulgaria

12

Czech Republic

12

Denmark

9

Germany

24

Estonia

7

Ireland

9

Greece

12

Spain

21

France

24

Croatia

9

Italy

24

Cyprus

6

Latvia

7

Lithuania

9

Luxembourg

6

Hungary

12

Malta

5

Netherlands

12

Austria

12

Poland

21

Portugal

12

Romania

15

Slovenia

7

Slovakia

9

Finland

9

Sweden

12

United Kingdom

24’

2.   The number of members of the Committee of the Regions shall be temporarily increased to 353 to take account of the accession of Croatia for the period running from the date of accession until the end of the term of office during which Croatia accedes to the Union or until the entry into force of the decision referred to in Article 305, second paragraph, of the TFEU, whichever comes first.

3.   If the decision referred to in Article 305, second paragraph, of the TFEU has already been adopted by the date of accession, by way of derogation from Article 305, first paragraph, of the TFEU establishing the maximum number of members of the Committee of the Regions, Croatia shall be temporarily allocated an appropriate number of members until the end of the term of office during which it accedes to the Union.

---
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Organic Integrity in the Supply Chain:

Resource List for Organic Certifiers and Certified Handlers

The size and complexity of organic trade has grown over time, and many U.S. businesses rely on imports

to create organic products that consumers want. As the market grows, many growers, processors, and

handlers are working in multi-business supply chains, often across borders. Organic handlers and their

certifiers play a vital role in ensuring the integrity of organic products from farm to market. 

The global organic control system includes: strict production

standards; accreditation of certifiers; certification of farmers,

processors and handlers; and enforcement. The USDA organic

regulations include organic system plan requirements,

recordkeeping requirements, comprehensive process audits, and

inspections that trace organic product from market to farm.

The Agricultural Marketing Service, National Organic Program

(NOP) has published a number of resources for organic certifiers and handlers related to inspections and

recordkeeping. Access them below:

• Organic Integrity in the Supply Chain: Short Video and Training for Handlers. These videos review

the responsibilities of organic handlers in verifying that organic imports comply with U.S. standards.

• The Path: Interactive scenario-based training program for organic certifiers and inspectors. The

training follows an organic inspector through an annual inspection with a certified organic farmer.

• What to Expect at an Inspection: This producer-focused video series allows crop and livestock

operators to “experience” an inspection firsthand and better prepare for their own inspections.

• Recordkeeping Case Studies: Organized recordkeeping is key to certification. These case studies

review four successful recordkeeping models from different types of farms.

• Video: Recordkeeping for Organic Certification: Reminders about the importance of recordkeeping

in organic certification, and tips about maintaining an effective records system.

• NOP 2602: Recordkeeping for Certified Operations: This instruction outlines recordkeeping

requirements and provides examples of records that should be maintained by certified operations.

• NOP 2609: Unannounced Inspections: This instruction for certifiers provides guidelines for effective

unannounced inspections. 

• NOP 4009: Who Needs to be Certified and NOP 5031: Guidance: Certification Requirements for

Handling Unpackaged Organic Products: These documents clarify certification requirements for

operations that produce or handle agricultural products to be sold, labeled, or represented as

organic.

Organic Integrity Reminder

Inspectors are expected to

conduct thorough trace-back

audits and mass balance audits to

verify traceability and recordkeeping requirements.