alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1198 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1198

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 404 South Boulder Highway in Henderson, Nevada, as the ``Henderson 
               Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2019

   Mrs. Lee of Nevada (for herself, Mr. Horsford, Ms. Titus, and Mr. 
   Amodei) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 404 South Boulder Highway in Henderson, Nevada, as the ``Henderson 
               Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HENDERSON VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 404 South Boulder Highway in Henderson, Nevada, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Henderson Veterans Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Henderson 
Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Medical Security Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Samuel V. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, John R.
Lombardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Samuel V. Miller                                /s/ John R. Lombardi
Chief Executive Officer                             Chief Financial Officer

November 7, 2003                                    November 10, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                         Page 26

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-96283 on Form S-8 pertaining to The Cato Corporation 1999 Incentive
Compensation Plan, in Registration Statement No. 33-41314 on Form S-8 pertaining
to The Cato Corporation 1987 Incentive Stock Option Plan, in Registration
Statement No. 33-41315 on Form S-8 pertaining to The Cato Corporation 1987
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, and in Registration Statement Nos. 33-69844 and
333-96285 on Forms S-8 pertaining to The Cato Corporation 1993 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, of our report dated April 21, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of The Cato
Corporation included in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2003.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina

April 19, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6478
BERNARD BUSH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BENJAMIN J. ULEP, Medical Doctor, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00053-RBS-FBS) Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: June 2, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard Bush, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bernard Bush appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bush v. Ulep , No. 2:08-cv-00053-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2008; Mar. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          46,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  445,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                   238,400
<INVENTORY>                                      4,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               289,600
<PP&E>                                         608,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 322,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,155,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          811,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,400
<COMMON>                                        32,100
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,017,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,155,700
<SALES>                                      1,000,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,789,000
<CGS>                                          325,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,513,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (54,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (56,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (56,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (a) Joint Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-29671 and No. 333-29671-01) and related
Prospectus of Patriot American Hospitality, Inc. and Wyndham International, Inc.
(formerly Patriot American Hospitality Operating Company), (b) Joint
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-41927 and No. 333-41927-01) of
Patriot American Hospitality, Inc. and Wyndham International, Inc. (formerly
Patriot American Hospitality Operating Company), (c) Joint Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-39313 and No. 333-39313-01) and related
Prospectus of 1,681,793 paired shares of common stock of Patriot American
Hospitality, Inc. and Wyndham International, Inc. (formerly Patriot American
Hospitality Operating Company), (d) Joint Registration Statement on Form S-4
(File No. 333-44203 and No. 333-44203-01) of Patriot American Hospitality, Inc.
and Wyndham International, Inc., (e) Joint Registration Statement on Form S-8
(File No. 333-44197 and No. 333-44197-01) of Patriot American Hospitality, Inc.
and Wyndham International, Inc., and (f) Joint Registration Statement on Form S-
3 (File No. 333-28085 and No. 333-28085-01) and related Prospectus of
$1,000,000,000 of paired common stock and paired preferred stock of Patriot
American Hospitality, Inc. and Wyndham International, Inc. of our report dated
February 9, 1998, with respect to the financial statements and schedules of
Patriot American Hospitality, Inc. and Wyndham International, Inc. included in
this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 26, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 4 (Monday, January 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 936-937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ13-5-000]


City of Riverside, California; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 17, 2012, City of Riverside, 
California

[[Page 937]]

submitted its tariff filing per 35.28(e): Filing 2013 TRBAA and ETC 
Update to be effective 1/1/2013.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cf898a9d8c80a1a3a6a1aa9cbabfbfa0bdbb8fa9aabdace1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="195f5c4b5a56777570777c4a6c6969766b6d597f7c6b7a377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 31, 2012.

    Dated: December 21, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-00013 Filed 1-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BOYNTON-WHITWORTH FARMS, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability 

company, J. DUDLEY PARKER, JOHN F. McREYNOLDS, DENNIS C. 

GRASS and CHARLES F. McREYNOLDS,

Appellants,

v.

CADENCE BANK, N.A. f/k/a SUPERIOR BANK, N.A., PGM 

PROPERTIES, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company, ANNAM 

CORP., a Florida corporation, LEE DUONG, individually, GEN-X 

CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation, and all other unknown 

parties claiming by, through or under named appellees,

Appellees.

No. 4D13-4731

[ April 15, 2015 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; David F. Crow, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2012CA002783XXXXAG.

Karen E. Maller of Powell, Carney, Maller, P.A., St. Petersburg, for 

appellants.

Gary M. Carman and Richard F. Danese of Gray Robinson, P.A., Miami, 

for Appellee-Cadence Bank, N.A.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Boynton-Whitworth Farms, LLC, Dennis C. Grass, Charles

F. McReynolds, John F. McReynolds and J. Dudley Parker appeal a Default 

Final Deficiency Judgment in Favor of Cadence Bank, N.A. We reverse the 

default final deficiency judgment because appellants were denied due 

process by having judgment entered against them without notice of the 

hearing on Cadence Bank’s Verified Motion for Default Deficiency Final 

Judgment. See NCNB Nat’l Bank of Florida v. Pyramid Corp., 497 So. 2d 

1353, 1355 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (when the jurisdiction of the court is 

invoked to grant a deficiency judgment, the defendant must be given notice 

and an opportunity to be heard); Merrill v. Nuzum, 471 So. 2d 128, 129 

(Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (a deficiency is an unliquidated amount that entitles 
2

the defaulting party to notice of trial). Accordingly, we reverse and remand 

for further proceedings without addressing the remaining issues raised by 

appellant. See Talbot v. Rosenbaum, 142 So. 3d 965, 967-68 (Fla. 4th DCA 

2014); Minkoff v. Caterpillar Fin. Servs. Corp., 103 So. 3d 1049, 1051-52 

(Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Cellular Warehouse, Inc. v. GH Cellular, LLC, 957 So. 

2d 662, 665-67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); B/G Amusements, Inc. v. Mystery Fun 

House, Inc., 381 So. 2d 318, 320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Reversed and Remanded.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Robert Roll, Respondent, v Robert Murphy, Appellant.

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment. An injured worker cannot maintain an action for personal injuries against the owner of premises where an accident occurred when, as here, defendant was the sole stockholder, president and chief executive officer of the corporation which employed plaintiff *(see, Heritage v Van Patten,*59 NY2d 1017; *Caceras v Zorbas,*148 AD2d 339, *affd*74 NY2d 884; *Callari v Pellitieri,*130 AD2d 935; *St. Andrews v Lucarelli,*115 AD2d 155). Workers’ Compensation is plaintiff’s exclusive remedy *(see,*Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 [6]). Regardless of his status as owner of the premises where the injury occurred, defendant Murphy remains a coemployee in his relations with plaintiff in all matters arising from and connected with their employment *(Heritage v Van Patten, supra,*at 1018-1019). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Curran, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Finlay Enterprises, Inc., (the "Company") does hereby certify with
respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
July 30, 2005 (the "Report") that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: September 8, 2005
                                                /s/ Arthur E. Reiner
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Arthur E. Reiner
                                                Chairman, President and Chief
                                                Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
```
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF COMPLIANCE 

WITH FEDERAL OBLIGATIONS BY 

THE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS 

(RESPONDENT) 

Docket No. 16-15-10 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced 

Notice of Investigation initiated in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings> 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules ofPractice). Pursuant to the Rules of 

Practice, §16.ll(a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extended to on 

or before September 12, 2016. 

~l!ltt-ni: Robin K. Hunt 

Acting Director, Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May d. S , 2016, I placed in the United States mail (first class, 

postage paid), a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time addressed to: 

Respondent 

W. Eric Pilsk 

Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 

Counsel to the Respondent 

1001 Connecticut Avenue 

Suite 800 

Washington, DC 20036 

Mark Duebner 

Director of Aviation 

City of Dallas 

8008 Herb Kelleher Way, LB 16 

Dallas, TX 75235 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

J~~ Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

                              THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                DYNEGY INC. PROFIT SHARING/401(k) SAVINGS PLAN

        WHEREAS, Dynegy Inc. (the "Company") and other Employers have heretofore
adopted the Dynegy Inc. Profit Sharing/401(k) Savings Plan (the "Plan") for the
benefit of their eligible employees; and

        WHEREAS, the Company amended and restated the Plan on behalf of itself
and the other Employers, effective as of January 1, 1998; and

        WHEREAS, the Company desires to further amend the Plan on behalf of
itself and the other Employers;

        NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of
March 1, 1999:

                1. The term "calendar month" shall be deleted in each place such
        term appears in Sections 2.2, 3.1(b), and 3.1(c) of the Plan, and the
        term "payroll period" shall be substituted therefor in each such place.

                2. As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and
        reaffirmed.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused these presents to be
executed this ____________ day of _________________, 1999.

                                        DYNEGY INC.

                                        By:_______________________________
                                           Name:__________________________
                                           Title:_________________________
Exhibit 99

Dole
Food Company, Inc.
One Dole Drive
Westlake Village, CA 91362

March 29,
2002

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

Arthur
Andersen LLP ("Andersen") has audited the consolidated financial statements of Dole Food Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 29, 2001
and for the year then ended and has issued its report thereon dated January 30, 2002. The Company received a signed representation letter from Andersen concerning Andersen's ability to comply
with professional standards. Andersen's letter represents that the audit was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance
that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability of national office
consultation and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

|Very truly yours,                                                 |  |  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Gil Borok
Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
|   | Exhibit21.1 |
|--------|-------------|

 

 

 

 

**CAPITAL SOUTHWEST CORPORATION**

 

List of Subsidiaries

 

 

 

|        | Name of Subsidiary                            | State of Incorporation |        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|        |                                          |                        |        |
|   | All Components, Inc.                          | Nevada                 |   |
|   | Balco, Inc.                                   | Delaware               |
|   | Humac Company                                 | Texas                  |   |
|   | Media Recovery, Inc.                          | Nevada                 |   |
|   | The RectorSeal Corporation                    | Delaware               |
|   | Lifemark Group (formerly Skylawn Corporation) | Nevada                 |   |
|   | The Whitmore Manufacturing Company            | Delaware               |
|        |                                               |                        |        |  |