alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William TARANTINO and Linda Tarantino, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Terry MARTIN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 79CA0435.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

Oct. 25, 1979.

Schey & Schey Neil E. Piller, Longmont, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Honaker & Wilbur,. P.C., James F. Wilbur, Longmont, for defendant-appellee.

PIERCE, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their claims against defendant for conversion of their horse. We reverse.

Defendant assisted plaintiffs in purchasing a horse in July 1975. The parties agreed that, beginning in September 1975, the defendant would board the horse at his ranch for a monthly fee. Plaintiffs made one payment of $40 to defendant in October 1975, but made no further payments. Defendant demanded payment by telephone in December 1975, and directly, during a chance meeting at a local store, on February 1, 1976. On both occasions plaintiffs said they would make payment. Defendant mailed plaintiffs a certified letter, again demanding payment, on February 2, 1976. Again, plaintiffs did not respond. In mid-February defendant posted notices in several local stores that the horse was for sale. By the first of March, after making two unsuccessful attempts to notify plaintiffs of his intentions, defendant sold the. horse.

Plaintiffs brought action to recover the value of the horse and tack. The trial court found that the horse had been abandoned and dismissed plaintiffs’ action.

Plaintiffs contend, among other things, that the trial court erred in ruling that the *907horse could be presumed abandoned as defined by § 38-20-116(1), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Cum.Supp.), and that defendant had substantially complied with the notice requirement of § 38-20-116(2), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Cum.Supp.).

Assuming without deciding that the trial court’s ruling with respect to abandonment was correct, we agree that the trial court erred in finding that defendant provided plaintiffs the required notice of sale. Although defendant made unsuccessful attempts by telephone and in person to notify plaintiffs of the sale, he failed to send notice by registered or certified mail as required by the statute, thereby making him liable to plaintiffs. Section 38-20-107(2), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Cum.Supp.).

The judgment is reversed with directions to reinstate the complaint and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

RULAND and BERMAN, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1252 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 295
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1252

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            November 7, 2019

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard in Van Nuys, California, as the ``Marilyn 
                         Monroe Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARILYN MONROE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard in Van Nuys, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Marilyn Monroe Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marilyn 
Monroe Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 295

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1252

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard in Van Nuys, California, as the ``Marilyn 
                         Monroe Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 7, 2019

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1149 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1149

    To prohibit the Department of the Interior from issuing certain 
    geological and geophysical exploration permits under the Outer 
          Continental Shelf Lands Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2019

Mr. Van Drew (for himself, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Smith of 
 New Jersey, Ms. Shalala, and Mr. Mast) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the Department of the Interior from issuing certain 
    geological and geophysical exploration permits under the Outer 
          Continental Shelf Lands Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Atlantic Coastal Economies 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ISSUING PERMITS UNDER OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF 
              LANDS ACT.

    (a) In General.--The Department of the Interior may not issue any 
of the permits described in subsection (b). Any such permit issued 
before the date of the enactment of this Act shall have no force or 
effect.
    (b) Permits Described.--The permits referred to in subsection (a) 
are the following:
            (1) A permit under section 11 of the Outer Continental 
        Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1340) authorizing TGS-NOPEC 
        Geophysical Company to engage in geophysical exploration for 
        mineral resources (permit application number E14-001).
            (2) A permit under such section authorizing Ion/GX 
        Technology Corporation to engage in geophysical exploration for 
        mineral resources (permit application number E14-003).
            (3) A permit under such section authorizing WesternGeco LLC 
        to engage in geophysical exploration for mineral resources 
        (permit application number E14-004).
            (4) A permit under such section authorizing CGG Services 
        (US) Inc. to engage in geophysical exploration for mineral 
        resources (permit application number E14-005).
            (5) A permit under such section authorizing Spectrum Geo 
        Inc. to engage in geophysical exploration for mineral resources 
        (permit application number E14-006).
                                 <all>
```
USDA

a

United States Department of Agriculture

This is towerify that
Anyfarm USA

Anytown, Iowa

has successfully met USDA’s acceptance criteria for the voluntary

USDA Good Agricultural Practices & Good Handling Practices Audit
Farm Review, Field Harvesting and Field Packing Activities
Potatoes

Qin 2. OWE Fe Audit ID: 12345

Chief, Audit Services Branch 1/8/2020

Audits are valid for one year from date on certificate. To verify continued adherence to the program, please visit www.ams usda gov/eapghp,
#### Mary Farrell, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Jennifer Farrell, an Infant, Respondent, v Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Hurlbutt, J. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hurlbutt, J.— Declaratory Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Oscar Rodriguez, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rienzi, J.), rendered June 14, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that the trial court’s supplemental instruction was proper. At one point in his summation, the defendant’s attorney invited the jury to speculate as to why no fingerprint testimony was introduced at trial to establish that the defendant possessed the gun. Thereafter, during the course of deliberations, the jury requested "the testimony regarding fingerprints on the weapon”. Since there was no testimony adduced at trial pertaining to either the presence or absence of fingerprints, the trial court properly instructed the jury not to speculate on such matters *(see generally, People v Wallace,*152 AD2d 713, 714; *People v Hernandez,*143 AD2d 842, 845; *cf., People v Rodriguez,*141 AD2d 382, 385).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1337. DEMETRIOUS DOYLE v. THE STATE.

Demetrious Doyle filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s order revoking

his probation. But pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5), appeals from orders revoking

probation must be made by timely application for discretionary appeal. Doyle’s

failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over

this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Johnson v. State, 237 Ga. App.

677 (516 SE2d 539) (1999).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/30/2015

March 30, 2015
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. AD OL F O MON T E S - C AS T R O, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 10455 D . C. N o . 4 : 0 9 - c r - 0 1 2 7 7 - D CB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona D a vi d C . B ury , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B e f o r e : P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . A do l fo M on t es -C as tro appeal s f rom the 60 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f o llo w in g h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rille g a l r e - e n trya f

te rd e p o rta tio n , in vi ol a t i on of

8 U . S . C . § 1326. P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 1967) , M ont e s - C a s tr o’ s c ouns e l ha s f i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng the r e a r e no gr ounds f or 

# FI LED MA Y26 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 10455 2 re l i ef , al on g w i th a m ot i on t o w i thd raw as coun se l of re cord. W e have provi ded the appe l l a ntw i th the opportuni tyt o f i l e apr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f . W e ha ve c o n s id e r e dap p e llan t’s p r o s e s up p le m e n ta l b r ie f , th e g o v e rn m e n t’s m o tio n to d ism iss, an dco u n se l’ s m o ti o n to allo w a p ro se re sp o n se to th e g o v ern m en t’ s m o t i o n t o d i sm i ss. W e d e n yth e g o v e rn m e n t’s m o tio n to d is m is s . W e a ls o d e n yap p e lla te coun se l ’ s m ot i on t o al l ow a pro se re spon se . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. A cco rd i n g l y, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en ti s A FFI R M ED .
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RONALD RUDOLPH RODRIGUEZ, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00259-CR

Appeal from the

207th District Court

of Comal County, Texas 

(TC# CR2015-395)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until May 5, 2017. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Sammy M. McCrary, State’s attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before May 5, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of April, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
EXHIBIT 10.8



PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   Ministry of Energy Mines and Petroleum Resources


RECORD OF 2 POST CLAIM - MINERAL TENURE ACT

(Section 27)



	
____________________________________
	
391989______________________________

	
Mining Division
	
Tenure No.

	
____________________________________
	
____________________________________

	
Gold Commissioner
	
Date of Record




_____________________________________________________________________________________



APPLICATION TO RECORD A 2 POST CLAIM



I, Stephen Kenwood, Name of Locator, 2073 149th Street, Surrey, British Columbia, V4A 8C4, (604) 535-8146, Client No. 134185, Agent for Paul Reynolds, 4035 W. 31st Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6S 1Y7, Client No. 122617, hereby apply for record of a 2 Post Claim for the location as outlined on the attached copy of mineral titles reference map No. 082L2E, in the Vernon Mining Division.



ACCESS



Describe how you gained access to the location, include reference to roads, trails, topographic features, permanent landmarks and a description of the legal post location.



Access to location gained by traveling east of Vernon on Highway 6 15 km. past Cherryville to Monashee Creek.  The Initial Post is approximately 2.6 km. further south along Highway 6 from Monashee Creek and about 50 metres east of Highway 6.



TAG INFORMATION



I have affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "INITIAL POST" (No. 1) to the initial post and impressed this information on the tag:



TAG NUMBER 706069 M  INITIAL POST (No. 1)



	
CLAIM NAME
	
WYATT 6

	
LOCATOR
	
Stephen Kenwood

	
AGENT FOR
	
Paul Reynolds

	
DATE COMMENCED
	
February 8, 2002

	
TIME COMMENCED
	
11:00

	
DIR. TO F.P.
	
015

	
METRES TO RIGHT
	
0

	
METRES TO LEFT
	
500






"Direction" means a bearing measured between 0 degrees and 360 degrees, where 0 degrees is the bearing of true north.    time is a.m.


I have securely affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "FINAL POST (No. 2)" to the final post (or the witness post) and impressed this information on the tag:

	
CLAIM NAME
	
WYATT 6

	
LOCATOR
	
Stephen Kenwood

	
AGENT FOR
	
Paul Reynolds

	
DIST. FROM I.P.
	
500 metres

	
DATE COMPLETED
	
February 8, 2002

	
TIME COMPLETED
	
12:15






If a witness post was placed for final post:  Bearing and distance from witness post to the true position of the final corner post, exactly as written on the witness post:  _________ degrees, _________ metres.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT



I have complied with all of the terms and conditions of the Mineral Tenure Act and Regulations pertaining to the location of the 2 post claims and have attached a plan of the location on which the positions of the initial and final post (and witness post, if applicable) are indicated.  The tag information supplied above is the identical information that I impressed upon the respective tags affixed to the applicable post when I located this claim, and the information is true and correct.


/s/  "Stephen Kenwood"

Stephen Kenwood

Signature of Locator



SEAL



RECEIVED

SUB-RECORDER

VANCOUVER, BC

FEB. 28, 2002

Recording Stamp
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




**Exhibit
      32.2**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63
      of
      Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Finlay
      Enterprises, Inc., (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 5, 2007
      (the “Report”) that:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition
              and results of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date: June 14, 2007
            
            
            /s/
                Bruce E. ZurlnickBruce
                E. ZurlnickSenior
                Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
                Officer




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
      States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
      disclosure document.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TIMOTHY STULTZ and CAROLYN STULTZ,

Appellants,

v.

BANKUNITED, N.A.,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1115

[May 21, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; James Nutt, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502018CA007570.

Taylor M. Claudon and Kendrick Almaguer of The Ticktin Law Group, 

Deerfield Beach, for appellants.

William L. Grimsley and Peter J. Maskow of McGlinchey Stafford, 

Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.1

LEVINE, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

1 We are mindful of the issuance of Administrative Order SC20-23 

(the requirement in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.580(a) for the clerk to issue 

a writ of possession “forthwith” remains suspended) and Executive Order 20-94 

(suspending and tolling any statute providing for a mortgage foreclosure cause of 

action under Florida law for 45 days from April 2, 2020). We trust any motions 

directed to those orders shall be filed in the lower tribunal upon issuance of our 

mandate.
Order entered April 14, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00562-CR

TODD ALLEN REICH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-80306-2013

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s second motion for extension of time to file its brief. We 

GRANT the motion. We ORDER the State’s brief received April 8, 2015 filed as of the date of 

this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 5

SECTION 5

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 267

(ex Article 234 TEC)

(ex Article 234 TEC)

The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning:

| (a) | the interpretation of the Treaties; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the interpretation of the Treaties;

| (b) | the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union;

Where such a question is raised before any court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal may, if it considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment, request the Court to give a ruling thereon.

Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court.

If such a question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State with regard to a person in custody, the Court of Justice of the European Union shall act with the minimum of delay.

---
IB 

Union Calendar No. 403 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1267 

[Report No. 116–503] 

To designate a mountain ridge in the State of Montana as ‘‘B–47 Ridge’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. GIANFORTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2020 

Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be 

printed 

A BILL 

To designate a mountain ridge in the State of Montana 

as ‘‘B–47 Ridge’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘B–47 Ridge Designa5 tion Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1267 RH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF B–47 RIDGE, MONTANA. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.— 

3 (1) IN GENERAL.—The unnamed mountain 

4 ridge located at 45°14′40.89′′N, 110°43′38.75′′W 

5 that runs south and west of Emigrant Peak in the 

6 Absaroka Range in the State of Montana, which is 

7 the approximate site of a crash of a B–47, shall be 

8 known and designated as ‘‘B–47 Ridge’’. 

9 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, 

10 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 

11 the United States to the ridge described in para12 graph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to ‘‘B– 

13 47 Ridge’’. 

14 (b) AUTHORIZATION FOR PLAQUE.— 

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—A plaque that memorializes 

16 the crash of the B–47 (including denoting the names 

17 of the victims of the crash) may be installed on B– 

18 47 Ridge. 

19 (2) FUNDING.—No Federal funds may be used 

20 to design, procure, install, or maintain the plaque 

21 authorized under paragraph (1). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 403 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1267 

[Report No. 116–503] 

A BILL 

To designate a mountain ridge in the State of 

Montana as ‘‘B–47 Ridge’’. 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2020 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS