alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016203EN.01000801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/8

---

Article 6

To encourage the carrying out of research programmes communicated to it the Commission may:

| (a) | provide financial assistance within the framework of research contracts, without, however, offering subsidies; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

provide financial assistance within the framework of research contracts, without, however, offering subsidies;

| (b) | supply, either free of charge or against payment, for carrying out such programmes, any source materials or special fissile materials which it has available; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

supply, either free of charge or against payment, for carrying out such programmes, any source materials or special fissile materials which it has available;

| (c) | place installations, equipment or expert assistance at the disposal of Member States, persons or undertakings, either free of charge or against payment; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

place installations, equipment or expert assistance at the disposal of Member States, persons or undertakings, either free of charge or against payment;

| (d) | promote joint financing by the Member States, persons or undertakings concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

promote joint financing by the Member States, persons or undertakings concerned.

---
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Genova, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and to the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

|Date: November 12, 2007 |                                   
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                        | /s/ Paul Genova                   
|                        | Paul Genova                       
|                        | President, Chief Financial Officer
|                        | (Principal Financial Officer)     

---
profiles of

Top U.S. Agricultural Ports

T

he ocean transportation system is essential in the 

movement of agricultural products to customers 

around the world. In calendar year 2017, agricultural 

exporters moved 197 million metric tons of waterborne 

cargo valued at over $153 billion (PIERS). The following 

Agricultural Port Profiles provide a view of the top 20 U.S. 

ocean ports moving agricultural export and import traffic 

(see table). The Profiles provide detailed information 

on commodities moved, shipping lines used, as well as 

destination and origin markets. 

Follow this link for a glossary of terms.

Follow this link for the full report.

Rank U.S. Ports State Imports Exports Total Share

Metric Tons

1 New Orleans Port Region* LA 1,952,594 70,584,163 72,536,757 37%

2 New York/New Jersey NY 8,829,822 1,312,863 10,142,685 5%

3 Kalama WA 0 10,125,680 10,125,680 5%

4 Los Angeles CA 2,595,601 6,665,401 9,261,003 5%

5 Tacoma WA 256,165 7,480,590 7,736,755 4%

6 Houston TX 2,341,184 4,757,613 7,098,797 4%

7 Long Beach CA 2,384,484 4,564,265 6,948,749 4%

8 Seattle WA 784,395 5,670,057 6,454,452 3%

9 Oakland CA 2,026,823 4,264,143 6,290,966 3%

10 Norfolk VA 1,381,092 4,663,980 6,045,071 3%

11 Longview WA 0 5,410,185 5,410,185 3%

12 Savannah GA 2,395,747 2,722,564 5,118,311 3%

13 Vancouver WA 777 4,421,787 4,422,563 2%

14 Portland OR 9,970 4,151,703 4,161,673 2%

15 Philadelphia PA 3,519,151 155,367 3,674,518 2%

16 Corpus Christi TX 1,024 3,220,930 3,221,953 2%

17 Wilmington DE 2,382,887 19,004 2,401,892 1%

18 Port Everglades FL 1,504,935 724,891 2,229,826 1%

19 Baltimore MD 1,985,159 213,299 2,198,458 1%

20 Charleston SC 528,892 1,202,945 1,731,836 1%

Other 11,328,456 8,584,190 19,912,648 9%

Total 46,209,158 150,915,620 197,124,778 100%

*New Orleans Port Region includes: South Louisiana, New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Avondale, St Rose, Gramercy, and 

 Destrehan, LA

New Orleans: Wikipedia

New York: By Amerune

Kalama: Port of Kalama

Houston: Port of Houston

Los Angeles: ©Port of Los Angeles

Long Beach: Courtesy of the Port of Long Beach

Virginia Ports: Port of Norfolk, photo by Stephen Little

Long Beach, CA

Los Angeles, CA

Oakland, CA

Portland, OR

Kalama, WA

Seattle, WA

Tacoma, WA

Vancouver, WA

Corpus Christi, TX

Houston, TX

New Orleans, LA

Port Everglades, FL

Savannah, GA

Norfolk, VA

Philadelphia, PA

New York, NY

Tacoma: Port of Tacoma

Seattle: Port of Seattle, image by Don Wilson

Oakland: Port of Oakland

Savannah: Georgia Ports Authority, photo by Stephen Morton

Longview: Port of Longview

Vancouver: Port of Vancouver

Philadelphia: Philadelphia Regional Port Authority

Portland: ©Port of Portland

Corpus Christi: Port of Corpus Christi

Wilmington: Port of Wilmington, Delaware 

Baltimore: Port of Baltimore

Port Everglades: Port Everglades

Charleston: SC Ports Authority 

Photo Credits:

Agricultural 

Marketing 

Service

June 2019

Baltimore, MD

Longview, WA

Wilmington, D

E

Top 20 U.S. Ports Moving Waterborne Agricultural Trade, 2017

Charleston, SC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION FOR THE FIFTY-TWO WEEKS
ENDED NOVEMBER 1, 1996 AS SET FORTH IN ITS 10-K FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       6,343,022
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,510,725
<ALLOWANCES>                                   503,584
<INVENTORY>                                 15,603,912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,423,424
<PP&E>                                      40,492,197
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,637,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,277,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,022,257
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,453,816
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,801,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,277,948
<SALES>                                    118,316,470
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           118,316,470
<CGS>                                       75,874,768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               75,874,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            33,325,319
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               139,150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             224,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,116,383
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,465,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,651,383
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,651,383
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
        

</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 111 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1365 

[Report No. 116–149] 

To make technical corrections to the Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2019 

Mr. SAN NICOLAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

JULY 11, 2019 

Additional sponsors: Ms. OMAR, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. BACON, Ms. GARCIA of 

Texas, Mr. SHIMKUS, and Mr. GRIJALVA

JULY 11, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1365 RH

A BILL 

To make technical corrections to the Guam World War II 

Loyalty Recognition Act. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1365 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO GUAM WORLD 

4 WAR II LOYALTY RECOGNITION ACT. 

5 Title XVII of division A of Public Law 114–328 is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in section 1703(e)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘equal to’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘not to exceed’’; and 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘covered into the Treasury 

11 as miscellaneous receipts’’ and inserting ‘‘used 

12 to reimburse the applicable appropriations’’; 

13 (2) in section 1704(a) by striking ‘‘, subject to 

14 the availability of appropriations,’’ and inserting 

15 ‘‘from the Claims Fund’’; and 

16 (3) by striking section 1707(a). 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 111 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1365 

[Report No. 116–149] 

A BILL 

To make technical corrections to the Guam World 

War II Loyalty Recognition Act. 

JULY 11, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 10, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-61069

Summary Calendar

 

ESSA GYE,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

 

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A76-301-663

 

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Essa Gye, a native and citizen of Gambia, petitions for review

of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming

the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding Gye removable for

falsely claiming United States citizenship. Gye argues that there

is no evidence in the record to show that he claimed to be a United

States citizen, as opposed to a United States national, when he

checked the “citizen or national” box on the Employment Eligibility
1See Lopez De Jesus v. INS, 312 F.3d 155, 158-59 (5th Cir.

2002); Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996).

2

Verification (I-9) form. However, Gye has not shown that the

evidence compels a conclusion contrary to that of the IJ.1

Accordingly, Gye’s petition for review in DENIED.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XVIII

ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND TERRITORIAL COHESION

ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND TERRITORIAL COHESION

Article 174

(ex Article 158 TEC)

(ex Article 158 TEC)

In order to promote its overall harmonious development, the Union shall develop and pursue its actions leading to the strengthening of its economic, social and territorial cohesion.

In particular, the Union shall aim at reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions.

Among the regions concerned, particular attention shall be paid to rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps such as the northernmost regions with very low population density and island, cross-border and mountain regions.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

Order 

April 17, 2015

149800

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149800

COA: 309729

Wayne CC: 06-007375-FC

DAWAN TYNER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and 

we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for proceedings consistent with its 

April 12, 2012 order granting the defendant’s motion for new trial and relief from 

judgment.

A trial court’s decision to grant a new trial based upon newly-discovered evidence 

is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See People v Terrell, 289 Mich App 553, 558 

(2010), lv den 489 Mich 858 (2011). An abuse of discretion occurs when the trial court’s 

decision is outside the range of principled outcomes. People v Musser, 494 Mich 337, 

348 (2013). Here, the trial court held that three statements by Carlos Strong to his 

mother, Carol Turner, and his former girlfriend, Rasheedah Pearson, constituted excited 

utterances. Those statements indicated that defendant was not at the crime scene on the 

night of the shooting. Finding that the statements satisfied the test for newly-discovered 

evidence, including that they would make a different result reasonably probable on 

retrial, the trial court ordered a new trial. See People v Cress, 468 Mich 678 (2003). The 

Court of Appeals erred by substituting its own opinion of the credibility and veracity of 

the witnesses for that of the trial court. Given the trial court’s superior position to assess 

the credibility and veracity of the witnesses, its determination that the newly-discovered 

evidence would make a different result probable on retrial was not so egregious that it 

was outside the range of principled outcomes. People v Babcock, 469 Mich 247, 269 

(2003). See also Alder v Flint City Coach Lines, Inc, 364 Mich 29, 38 (1961) (CARR, J.,
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 17, 2015

s0414

2

Clerk

concurring) (“This Court has repeatedly held that a trial judge, in passing on a motion for 

a new trial, is vested with a large discretion. The wisdom of such rule is obvious. The 

judge has the advantage of seeing the witnesses on the stand, of listening to their 

testimony, of noting the attitude of the jury to various matters that may arise during the 

trial, and is in far better position than is an appellate court to pass on questions of possible 

prejudice, sympathy, and matters generally that occur in the course of a trial but which do 

not appear of record.”).

MCCORMACK, J., not participating because of her prior involvement in this case as 

counsel for a party.
# fgis-925

Form Approved OMB No. 0581-0309.  According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0581-0309. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 2 hours per response and 1 minute of recordkeeping, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

# Example Form

Form Approved OMB No. 0581-0309.  According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0581-0309. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 2 hours per response and 1 minute of recordkeeping, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

# Instructions
# EUR-Lex - 12012M035 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M035

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE V: GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION AND SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Chapter 2: Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy - Section 1: Common provisions - Article 35 (ex Article 20 TEU) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0035 - 0035 *

Article 35

(ex Article 20 TEU)

The diplomatic and consular missions of the Member States and the Union delegations in third countries and international conferences, and their representations to international organisations, shall cooperate in ensuring that decisions defining Union positions and actions adopted pursuant to this Chapter are complied with and implemented.

They shall step up cooperation by exchanging information and carrying out joint assessments.

They shall contribute to the implementation of the right of citizens of the Union to protection in the territory of third countries as referred to in Article 20(2)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and of the measures adopted pursuant to Article 23 of that Treaty.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE>   7
<LEGEND>
This statement contains summary financial information
extracted from Integon Corporation's March 31, 1997
financial statements and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           625,104
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          625,104
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            625,104
<EQUITIES>                                     0
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 627,919
<CASH>                                         33,536
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             176,839
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         52,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,480,277
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                523,554
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            374,194
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                150,705
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    14
<COMMON>                                       173
<OTHER-SE>                                     172,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,480,277
<PREMIUMS>                                     246,479
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            9,043
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (481)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 4,540
<BENEFITS>                                     199,238
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           199,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (51,963)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (18,575)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (33,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (33,388)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (2.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.21)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        

</TABLE>
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 88 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Franklin D. Raines as 

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the 
2 

•HJ 88 EH 

1 vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Insti2 tution, in the class other than Members of Congress, oc3 curring by reason of the expiration of the term of John 

4 W. McCarter Jr. of Illinois on March 21, 2020, is filled 

5 by the appointment of Franklin D. Raines of Washington, 

6 DC. The appointment is for a term of six years, beginning 

7 the date of the enactment of this joint resolution. 

Passed the House of Representatives August 22, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 88 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Franklin D. 

gents of the Smithsonian Institution. Raines as a citizen regent of the Board of Re-