alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          78,064                  28,135
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,557,051               1,644,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    177,529                 193,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,779,230               2,336,639
<PP&E>                                       6,911,330               2,626,587
<DEPRECIATION>                               (492,938)               (569,832)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,724,411               5,927,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (5,346,170)             (2,183,937)
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                (75,418)
<COMMON>                                   (2,204,658)                 (1,555)
<OTHER-SE>                                   (372,881)             (1,120,314)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              (15,724,411)             (5,927,006)
<SALES>                                    (5,719,542)             (3,160,757)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (5,719,542)             (3,160,757)
<CGS>                                        5,412,004               3,035,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,412,004               3,035,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,000                   3,725
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,896                  18,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (138,766)                (41,510)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    48,165                  13,534
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (90,601)                (27,976)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (90,601)                (27,976)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39                    0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38                    0.25


</TABLE>
NO. 07-03-0548-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

	______________________________

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLANT

	V.

	DYLON CARTER, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 15,536C; HONORABLE PATRICK A. PIRTLE, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ. and BOYD, S.J.1

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant, The State of Texas, by and through its District Attorney, James A. Farren, filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal on September 28, 2004 stating that it desires to withdraw its appeal.

	Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant appellant’s motion for voluntary dismissal and dismiss the appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2.  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing, and our mandate will issue forthwith.  

						James T. Campbell

						        Justice

Do not publish.
Updated June 17, 2010 

Formal Recommendation by the 

National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) 

to the National Organic Program (NOP)

Date: April 29, 2011

Subject: Annotation change to amend 205.601 (j) (4) Lignin sulfonate--to 

read ‘a chelating agent and dust suppressant’. 

Chair: Tracy Miedema

 

 

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action X

Guidance Statement 

Other 

Statement of the Recommendation (Including Recount of Vote): 

The recommendation is to amend the annotation for lignin sulfonate on 

205.601(j)(4), to read "a chelating agent and dust suppressant. The 

motion passed 14 yes, 0 no.

 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with 

OFPA and NOP): 

Subsection (j) is Materials for use as Plant or Soil Amendments, and so the 

specific annotation that includes, in this particular listing, as a flotation aid, 

that's why it appears to be not applicable, so we opted to get rid of it. Because 

in the context of being a plant or soil amendment, it is not also a flotation aid.

Committee Vote:

Moved: John Foster Second: Tina Ellor

Yes: 14 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recusal: 0
National Organic Standards Board 

Crops Committee 

2012 Sunset Proposed Recommendation 

Lignin sulfonate 

April 29, 2011 

List: §205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production. 

(j) As plant or soil amendments. 

(4)Lignin sulfonate—chelating agent, dust suppressant, flotation agent. 

Committee Summary 

In addition to the separate recommendation on the annotation change for this material on § 

205.601(l)(1), it was also noted that there is a duplicate listing as a flotation agent in (j) As 

plant or soil amendments, so the Crops Committee is recommending relisting lignin sulfonate 

as plant or soil amendments with the annotation change: chelating agent, dust suppressant. 

Committee Recommendation 

Relist lignin sulfonate on § 205.601(j)(4) with the amended annotation: chelating agent, dust 

suppressant. 

Committee Vote 

Motion: Tina Ellor Second: Nick Maravell 

Yes: 5 No: 0 Absent: 2 Abstain: 0 Recuse: 0
#### Joann A. Mondello, Respondent, v Rodney J. Mondello, Appellant.

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered November 25, *7131987, the defendant former husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.), entered January 8, 1990, as granted that branch of the plaintiff former wife’s motion which was for delivery to her of a mortgage, deed and promissory note, which were then being held in escrow, to enable her to record the documents and commence an action to foreclose the mortgage.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Upon the stipulation of settlement entered into on November 12, 1987, and the judgment of divorce entered November 25, 1987, the plaintiff former wife agreed to waive all her right, title and interest in the marital premises upon the defendant former husband’s agreement to pay her the sum of $325,000 by a payment of $200,000 on May 12, 1989, and a payment of $125,000 on November 12, 1989. To secure these payments, the defendant executed a mortgage, deed and promissory note in favor of the plaintiff, which documents were to be held in escrow by the plaintiff’s attorney. When the defendant admittedly failed to make the first payment, the plaintiff moved, in relevant part, for an order directing the delivery to her of the mortgage, deed and promissory note, which were then being held in escrow, to enable her to record the documents and commence an action to foreclose the mortgage.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the plaintiff’s notice of motion and supporting papers were sufficiently particular so as to alert the Supreme Court and the defendant to the relief sought and the grounds therefor *(see,*CPLR 2214 [a]), and any alleged mistakes or defects in the notice of motion or supporting papers were mere irregularities which were properly disregarded by the Supreme Court *(see,*CPLR 2001; *Ingle v Glamore Motor Sales,*140 AD2d 493, 494, *affd*73 NY2d 183). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Lawrence and Balletta, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12

     THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN and SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIO AMOUNTS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    Year Ended
                                                                   December 31,
                                                                   ------------
                                                     1996             1995             1994
                                                     ----             ----             ----
<S>                                                 <C>              <C>              <C>
Earnings:

  Pre-tax income                                    $1,640           $  488           $  769

  Add:
    Interest and fixed charges,
      excluding capitalized interest                    99               95               77

    Portion of rent under long-term
      operating leases representative
      of an interest factor                            203              175              123

  Amortization of capitalized interest                   3                1                -

  Less:  Undistributed equity in earnings
           of investments accounted for
           under the equity method                     (12)              (6)              (4)
                                                    -------          -------          -------

  Total earnings available for fixed charges        $1,933           $  753           $  965
                                                    =======          =======          =======
Fixed charges:

  Interest and fixed charges                        $  112           $  102           $   79

  Portion of rent under long-term operating
    leases representative of an interest
    factor                                             203              175              123
                                                    -------          -------          -------

  Total fixed charges                               $  315           $  277           $  202
                                                    =======          =======          =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   6.14x            2.72x(1)         4.78x
                                                    =======          =======          =======
</TABLE>


(1)  Earnings  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  1995, include merger,
severance and asset charges of $671 million.  Excluding these costs, the ratio
would have been 5.16x
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 20, 2015

No. 04-15-00063-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.R.M., child,

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-11-22140-CV

The Honorable Cathy Morris, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Debra Gifford’s motion to hand-file a CD of the exhibits is granted. However, the 

contempt hearing set for April 23, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. will proceed as scheduled.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association
Members/State Street Collective Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James S. Phalen, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

       (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                                        /s/ James S. Phalen
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        James S. Phalen
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        August 9, 2005
Exhibit 32

# Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cal-Maine
Foods, Inc.(the Company), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended May 29, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                                           | 
|------------------------------------------ | 
|/s/  Fred R. Adams, Jr.                    | 
|Fred R. Adams, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer | 

|                                        | 
|--------------------------------------- | 
|/s/  Bobby J. Raines                    | 
|Bobby J. Raines
Chief Financial Officer | 

Date:  August 12, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
       
<S>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>   DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>        SEP-30-1995
<CASH> 620,767            
<SECURITIES>            0
<RECEIVABLES>       0
<ALLOWANCES>       0
<INVENTORY>         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>    0
<PP&E> 14,308,630     <F1> 
<DEPRECIATION> 572,444     
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 14,793,551   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>    0
<BONDS> 712,904       <F2>      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>    0
<PREFERRED>         0
<COMMON> 13,987,780    <F3> 
<OTHER-SE>          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 14,793,551
<SALES>             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 1,285,979    <F4> 
<CGS>               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS> 376,746      <F5> 
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 44,374     <F6> 
<LOSS-PROVISION>    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>     0
<INCOME-TAX>        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 0
<DISCONTINUED>      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>     0
<CHANGES>           0
<NET-INCOME>   864,859
<EPS-PRIMARY>       0
<EPS-DILUTED>       0

<FN>
<F1>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F2>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MINORITY INTEREST IN JOINT VENTURE
<F3>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F4>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F5>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES
<F6>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS MINORITY INTEREST IN JOINT
       VENTURES' NET INCOME
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Procedural

Data Discrepancy

found during 

Verification

Late Report

Received after noon local 

time on Tuesday

in time 

to be included in current

week’s release

Missing Report

Not received in time 

to be included in

current week’s release

AMS Auditor Exit Conference

4

th

Strike for

same

Discrepancy

4

th

Late Report

1/ In this flowchart, AMS = AMS, Dairy Programs; MIB = Market Information Branch ; DA = Deputy Administrator 

2/ Firms will have a chance to respond in writing or in person to the AMS Cease and Desist (C & D) letter. AMS will review response and make 

decision on whether to issue a C & D order. If issued, the next offense would result in firm having to appear in U.S. District Court. Court would make 

decision regarding penalties.

Dairy Product Mandatory Reporting Non-Compliance Flowchart 1/

3

rd

Strike for 

same

Discrepancy

3

rd

Late Report 

1

st Missing

Report

2

nd Missing

Report

1

st or 2nd

Strike for 

same

Discrepancy

7

th

Strike for

Discrepancy

6

th

Strike for

Discrepancy

1

st thru 5th

Strike for

Discrepancy

AMS - MIB

Warning 

Letter

AMS - DA

Cease & Desist

Letter 2/

AMS - MIB

Notification 

Letter

Clerical

Data Discrepancy

found during

Verification

AMS - MIB

Warning 

Letter

AMS - DA

Cease & Desist

Letter 2/

AMS - MIB

Notification 

Letter

AMS - MIB

Notification 

Letter

AMS - DA

Cease & Desist

Letter 2/

AMS - DA

Cease & Desist

Letter 2/

AMS – MIB

Final Review and

Assign Discrepancies

AMS Auditor Exit Conference

AMS - MIB 

Final Review and

Assign Discrepancies

1

st or 2nd

Late Report

AMS - MIB

Warning 

Letter

AMS - MIB

Warning 

Letter
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          -  [USITC SE-12-001]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

January 20, 2012 at 11 a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote in Inv. No. 731-TA-703 (Third Review) (Furfuryl Alcohol from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before January 30, 2012.

5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

 Issued: January 13, 2012.

William R. Bishop,

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.

[FR Doc. 2012-949 Filed 1-13-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
| (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|            |   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| August 18, 2010 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Nandu Thondavadi                           |
|            |   |   |   | Nandu Thondavadi                                                                                                                                                                 |
|            |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer and Director                                                                                                                                             |

|            |   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|-----------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| August 18, 2010 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Dhru Desai                                          |
|            |   |   |   | Dhru Desai                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|            |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer, President and Director                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2


                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Butler Manufacturing Company:

We have audited the consolidated statement of earnings and retained earnings and
cash flows of Butler  Manufacturing  Company and subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31,   1996.   These   consolidated   financial   statements   are   the
responsibility  of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards  require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance  about  whether  the  financial  statements  are  free   of   material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,  evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also  includes
assessing the accounting principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by
management, as well as evaluating the  overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the  results  of operations and cash flows of
Butler  Manufacturing  Company  and  subsidiaries  at  December 31,  1996,   in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

                                                                   /S/ KPMG LLP 
                                                                   ____________
                                                                       KPMG LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
                                                               February 3, 1997