alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

CURTIS SPIVEY,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 29 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.5

Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, Administrative Rules and Agreement under  
which officers of the Company were eligible to receive options to purchase an 
aggregate of 798,600 shares (restated for the 2-for-1 stock split effective 
February 1998 and the 10 percent common stock dividends effective in 1998, 1997 
and 1996) of the Company's $2.50 par value common stock.  This Non-Qualified 
Stock Option Plan, Administrative Rules and Agreement is incorporated by 
reference from Form 10-K of Brenton Banks, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 
1997.
     46
(b) (4)(b) (4)
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1209-1210]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00106]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy


State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB)

AGENCY: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a teleconference call of the State 
Energy Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463; 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings 
be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, January 24, 2013 from 3:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. (EST). To 
receive the call-in number and passcode, please contact the Board's 
Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at the address or phone number listed 
below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gil Sperling, STEAB Designated Federal 
Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20585. 
Phone number is (202) 287-1644.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: To make 
recommendations to the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Energy 
Efficiency and Renewable Energy regarding goals and objectives, 
programmatic and administrative policies, and to otherwise carry out 
the Board's responsibilities as designated in the State Energy 
Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-440).
    Tentative Agenda: Receive an update on the activities of the 
STEAB's Taskforces, review the activities of the newly formed STEAB 
Strategic Planning Subcommittee, and provide an update to the Board on 
routine business matters and other topics of interest, and begin 
discussion planning for a spring 2013 meeting.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Gil Sperling at the address 
or telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must 
be received five days prior to the

[[Page 1210]]

meeting; reasonable provision will be made to include requested 
topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of the Board is empowered to conduct 
the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of 
business.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days on the STEAB Web site at: 
www.steab.org.


    Issued at Washington, DC, on January 2, 2013.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-00106 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Neurological Sciences Training Initial Review Group; NST-1 Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         June 4-5, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Best Western Tuscan Inn, 425 North Point Street, San Francisco, CA 94133.                              ( print page 24728)    

*Contact Person:*                         Raul A. Saavedra, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, NSC, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223,                         *saavedrr@ninds.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 18, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-9874 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Opinion issued March 31, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 15

- 00235

- CV

——————————— IN RE iWORKS PERSONNEL, INC., LUIS TREVINO, AND HAYDEE GUTIERREZ , Relator s

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Man damus

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

In th is original proceeding, R elators iWorks Personnel, Inc., Luis Trevino,
and Haydee Gutierrez seek mandamus relief f rom the trial court’s February 20
,
2015 Order denying iWorks Personnel, Inc.’s Plea to the Jurisdiction. The petition

1 The underlying case is Southwood Place Recreation Ass’n and Keysha Booker v. Southwood Place Pa tio Homes Cmty Ass’n, Inc. and S. Arjumand Mubaarak , Cause No. 2013

- 047353 , in the 190th Judicial District Court of Chambers Co unty

.2

for writ of mandamus is DENIED

. All pending motions are DENIED AS

MOOT

.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd
Exhibit 21



                                                      Percentage of Outstanding
                            Place of Incorporation       Stock or Ownership
Name of Subsidiary             or Organization       Interest Held by Registrant
------------------          ----------------------   ---------------------------



Cal-Maine Farms, Inc.             Delaware                       100%

Southern Equipment
 Distributors, Inc.               Mississippi                    100%

South Texas Applicators,
 Inc.                             Delaware                       100%

Cal-Maine Partnership,
 Ltd.                             Texas                           (1)

CMF of Kansas, LLC                Delaware                        (2)



-------------------------------------------------



(1)  Limited partnership in which Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. has a 1% General Partner
     interest and Cal-Maine Farms, Inc. has a 99% Limited Partner interest.

(2)  Limited liability company of which Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Cal-Maine
     Farms, Inc. are members and have 99% and 1% interests, respectively.




                                       40
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
(B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          35,899
<SECURITIES>                                     7,045
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,867<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,296
<PP&E>                                          25,552<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,031
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,529
<SALES>                                         82,953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,455
<CGS>                                           75,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,625
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,491
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,134
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,134
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
<FN>
<F1>THE ASSET VALUES FOR RECEIVABLES AND PP&E REPRESENT AMOUNTS NET OF ALLOWANCES
AND DEPRECIATION, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
&JJ *J&%#/J %J&(%J- *J;J;J'';J;J32;1

United States Court of Appeals 

&(J*J,%*J (+ *

 &<J	## %& )J60604

(+J'( #J16<J2015J

 J'( #J17<J2015J

&(

 		
J
; <

	


JJJJJ; <

	


JJJJ	J; <

	


&;J14H3155J


	J; <J




<J

J J ;J

J; 	<J* %J&$$ )) &%(J

&J& #J+( */<J



	


;J

''#J (&$J *J % *J

**)J  )*( *J &+(*J &(J *J

%*(#J )*( *J&J	## %& );J

&;J13H2098J

, J ;J (%*#<J



	
;J




*(J
 #J%()J''# J&(J ) # */J %)+(%J% *)<J%J$ % )*(* ,J

#-J!+J*($ %J**J+)J&J )J'()) &%<J%. */<J'&)*H*(+$* J)*())J )H

&((<J%J'()&%# */J )&((<JJ&+#J%&J#&%(J'(&($J )J!&J)JJ'+*/J)( ;J

+*J*J
J&+%J**JJ&+#J'(&($JEJ+##J(%J&J-&("J*J##J.(* &%#J#,#)J

+*J- *J*J&##&- %J%&%.(* &%#J# $ ** &%)=JABJ$/J%&*J-&("J %J.)) ,#/J%& )/J

%, (&%$%*)>JABJ$/J,J%&J-&("J- *J*J%(#J'+# >JABJ%)JJ)*#J-&("J

%, (&%$%*J- *J# $ *J%)>J*(J$+)*JJ%&J J* $H(*J'())+()>JABJ$/J

,J&%#/J)+'(  #J %*(* &%J- *J&-&("()>J%J%&J-&("J# %J- *J*J*)J
&;J14H3155J J2J

&J, &#%;FJJ,&* &%#J.'(*J*%J*)*  <J%J*J
J&+%<J**J!&)J(J, #H

#J&(J'&'#J- *J)+J# $ ** &%);J )J#J*J
J*&J%/J*J''# * &%J&(J%H

 *);JJ$ )*(*J!+<J( %J*J)J/J&%)%*J+%(J28J;;;JG636?@<J&+%J**J

 ) &%J)+''&(*J/J)+)*%* #J, %;J

%()J&)J%&*J&%*)*J*J
D)J ) &%J**<J JJ)J&%#/J*J# $ ** &%)J*J


J&+%<J*%JJ )J%&*J )#;J+*JJ)/)J**J )J&% * &%J )J$&(J),(J*%J

*J
J&%#+;JJ'( % '#J  +#*/J- *J )J'&) * &%J )J**J%&%J&J*J.$ %H

 %J'/)  %)J$J*&J*J&%#+) &%J**JJ )J+%#J*&J&J%/J" %J&J-&(";J%J

'/)  %J&' %J**J%()J&+#J%&*J&J%/J&J*J!&)J %J*J( D)J'(*$%*<J

+*J**J )JJ(J(/J(&$J&%#+ %J**JJ&+#J%&*J&J%/J&J*J!&)J, ##J %J*J

&%&$/J)JJ-&#;J

)"J*J&(#J(+$%*J-*(J,%J )J&-%J)*J, %J)+''&(*)J )J**"J&%J

*J
D)J&%#+) &%<J%()D)J#-/(J##J"J&%J*J*J**J*J*(%)DJ$ %H

 )*(* &%J)J(*J%()J70:J )#;J*J )J(* %#/JJ)# %*J*I%J*J
J

*&&"J *J %*&J&+%*I+*J *J )J%&*J )'&) * ,;JJJ%J*J& #J+( */J$ %H

 )*(* &%J+)J (%*J)*%()<J%J*JJ.'*)J**J)&$&%J- *JJ70:J ) # */J

(* %J%J'(&($J)&$J %+#J$'#&/$%*;J

%()D)J( J$ %* %)J**J*J
J,J*&&J# **#J- *J*&J )J, %J%J*&&J

$+J- *J*&J*J'&))  # */J?- J)&$J'/)  %)J$%* &%@J**JJ-)J.H

(* %J )J&% * &%I- J#J*J
J*&J %J**J%()J-)J%&*J( #J-%J

*)* / %J&+*J*J),( */J&J )J'(&#$);J)J(+$%*)J('"J %J)# *#/J H

(%*J#%+JJ&%*%* &%J**J*J
J)&+#J,J(+#J %J )J,&(J+)J*J,H

 %J,&()J $;J+*J%J
D)J!&J )J*&J- J&%# * %J, %<J%J*J#&)(J %J

)+JJ'(&))J )J&+%J*&J# ,J**J*J %(J&J*J)&+#J,J%J$&(J,&(H

#J*&J )J+);JJ)+)*%* #H, %J)*%(<J&-,(<J)")J-*(J*J$ % )H

*(* ,J ) &%J )J(* &%##/J)+''&(*<J%&*J-*(J *J )J&((*J? %J*J)%)J**J(H

#J!+)J-&+#J,J(J*J)$J&%#+) &%)J&%J*J)$J(&(@;JJ
D)JH

 ) &%J )J)+''&(*J/J)+)*%* #J, %J%J(J(&$J'(&+(#J((&(;J
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

p0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

138639

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138639 COA: 277987 Livingston CC: 04-014514-FH ROGER CHASTON, JR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 26, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY

, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in People v Idziak , 484 Mich 549 (2009).

C AVANAGH

, J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v Idziak , 484 Mich 549 (2009).
#### Joanne Salaris, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of George Salaris, Deceased, Appellant, v Jamaica Hospital et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

—In a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated February 8, 1990, as denied her motion, *inter alia,*to strike the defendants’ answers.

Ordered that the portion of the appeal which seeks review of the provision denying that branch of the motion which was to strike the answer of the defendant Dr. Samir K. Dutta is dismissed as abandoned, as the plaintiff has settled with that defendant; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents Jamaica Hospital and L. Hoffman are awarded one bill of costs.

There is no evidence that the plaintiff made any effort to comply with the notices to take depositions which were originally served by the defendant Dr. Samir K. Dutta in 1982. Instead, the plaintiff allowed her action to languish for approximately six years, until her attorneys made a request for judicial intervention in 1988. While the defendants (except for the defendant Jamaica Hospital) were in technical default of a subsequent order which directed them to produce witnesses for depositions which were to be completed on or before March 30, 1989, this failure is excusable in light of the *662pendency of a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s action, which we find to have been made in good faith on March 20, 1989. We also note that the plaintiff’s attorney refused to conduct a deposition of the defendant Dr. L. Hoffman, who had made himself available for this purpose on June 13, 1989. Under these and all the other circumstances of this case, we conclude that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for an order striking the answers of the defendants Jamaica Hospital and Dr. L. Hoffman (CPLR 3126; *see generally, Lowitt v Korelitz,*152 AD2d 506; *Stathoudakes v Kelman Contr. Corp.,*147 AD2d 690; *Wolper v LaGuardia Med. Group,*143 AD2d 830; *De Joy v L & T Tavern Corp.,*89 AD2d 613; *Cinelli v Radcliffe,*35 AD2d 829). The court instead properly ordered the defendant Dr. L. Hoffman to appear for an examination before trial on February 22, 1990, and the parties advise us that this deposition has in fact been held.

We have examined the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.2
                                  ------------

                               GEORGE STEWART, CPA
                     2301 SOUTH JACKSON STREET, SUITE 101-G
                            SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98144
                        (206) 328-8554 FAX (206) 328-0383




To Whom It May Concern:

The  firm  of  George  Stewart,  Certified  Public  Accountant  consents  to the
inclusions  of my report  April 17, 2002 on the  Financial  Statements  of Black
Gardenia,  Corp.,  as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, in any filings
that are  necessary now or in the future with the U.S.  Securities  and Exchange
Commission.



Very truly yours,


/s/George Stewart, CPA
George Stewart, CPA

April 18, 2002

                                  Page 51 of 51
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20209

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE RAMIREZ-VILLA, also known as Jorge Luis Ramirez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-357-ALL

--------------------

December 12, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Ramirez-Villa appeals his guilty-plea conviction for

illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a)(1) and (b)(2). He argues that his prior felony

conviction is an element of the offense which should have been

alleged in the indictment. Ramirez-Villa acknowledges that this

argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but

states that he is raising this issue to preserve it for possible

Supreme Court review in view of the decision in Apprendi v. New
No. 01-20209 

-2-

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule

Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90; see also

United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert.

denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001).

Ramirez-Villa also argues that the indictment was defective

in that it did not allege that he had any general intent to

reenter the United States. Ramirez-Villa’s argument is

foreclosed by United States v. Berrios-Centeno, 250 F.3d 294, 298

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 288 (2001), in which this

court concluded that an indictment charging the defendant with

being “previously deported and removed” from the United States

and subsequently “found present in the United States

. . . without having obtained the consent of the Attorney General

. . . to apply for readmission into the United States”

sufficiently alleged the general intent element of § 1326. 

Id. at 298-300 and n.4. Because the language of Ramirez-Villa’s

indictment is identical to that in Berrios-Centeno, the

indictment sufficiently alleged the general intent element of the

offense. See id. at 298-300.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32
                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  the
undersigned  officers of Newgold,  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
do hereby  certify with respect to the  Quarterly  Report of the Company on Form
10-QSB for the quarter  ended April 30,  2005 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

         (1) the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information  contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                  NEWGOLD, INC.


Dated:  June 10, 2005               /s/SCOTT DOCKTER
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Scott Dockter, President and Chief Executive
                                    Officer

Dated:  June 10, 2005               /s/JAMES KLUBER
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    James Kluber, Chief Financial Officer