alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: December 12, 2008
    /s/ Robert J. DavisRobert J. Davis, Chief Financial Officer
RE: question on SeaTac project

Nate Holloway to: Jesse Pritts 07/22/2010 03:40 PM

History: This message has been replied to.

Jesse,

I've filled out the corresponding pond info in the attached spreadsheet and

double checked that the files I sent you earlier match. 

Basically our treatment systems are modular with control units that can

handle between 1-5 54" sandfilters (500gpm nominal flow rate each), but each

sandfilter has it's own PLC and corresponding data set 

Pond F = 2-500gpm systems

Pond M = 1-500gpm system

CDG Ponds = 5-500gpm systems

South Pond = 4-500gpm system

I apologize for the confusion, we have since moved to a more comprehensive

web-based data management system in an effort to avoid issues such as this

If you need more information please let me know.

Nate

425-754-1541

-----Original Message-----

From: Pritts.Jesse@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Pritts.Jesse@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 8:53 AM

To: Nate Holloway

Subject: RE: question on SeaTac project

Hi NateDid a bit more digging this morning - take a look at the attached

spreadsheet. What I need to know is which systems correspond to which

ponds. I have six data files, but there is no information in five of

these files that identifies which systems are associated with which pond

on the site. Only one file (the site 3, January 2008 file) identifies

the system as being at pond M. If you need the actual data files, I can

email those to you. Just let me know.

Thanks againJesse W. Pritts, P.E.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Water

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW (4303T)

Washington, DC 20460

tel 202-566-1038

fax 202-566-1053

www.epa.gov/waterscience
Courier/FedEx:

1301 Constitution Ave., NW

Room 6233AA EPA West

Washington, DC 20004

(See attached file: Site 1 2 3 systems and ponds.xlsx)
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 2

LEGAL ACTS OF THE UNION, ADOPTION PROCEDURES AND OTHER PROVISIONS

SECTION 2

SECTION 2

PROCEDURES FOR THE ADOPTION OF ACTS AND OTHER PROVISIONS

Article 296

(ex Article 253 TEC)

(ex Article 253 TEC)

Where the Treaties do not specify the type of act to be adopted, the institutions shall select it on a case-by-case basis, in compliance with the applicable procedures and with the principle of proportionality.

Legal acts shall state the reasons on which they are based and shall refer to any proposals, initiatives, recommendations, requests or opinions required by the Treaties.

When considering draft legislative acts, the European Parliament and the Council shall refrain from adopting acts not provided for by the relevant legislative procedure in the area in question.

---
# C_2016203EN.01001801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/18

---

Article 30

Basic standards shall be laid down within the Community for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiations.

The expression ‘basic standards’ means:

| (a) | maximum permissible doses compatible with adequate safety; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

maximum permissible doses compatible with adequate safety;

| (b) | maximum permissible levels of exposure and contamination; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

maximum permissible levels of exposure and contamination;

| (c) | the fundamental principles governing the health surveillance of workers. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the fundamental principles governing the health surveillance of workers.

---
Inspected

by experts

Protected

by law

Inspected

by experts

Traced

from farm to store

Shaped

by public input

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

Final.pdf 6 2/23/2024 9:32:35 AM
1 

### B E CKH A M

, L ISA

F r om: W . Da vi d J en k i n s [ d j en k i n s @ ape x po w e r g r oup. c om ]

S e nt: T hu rs da y

, J anua r y 02, 2014 9:01 AM

T o: BE C K H A M, LI SA

Cc: R i o s

, G e r a r do

S ub jec t: Pi o Pi c o

- P e r m i ttee A dd r e ss

H i L isa

,

A f te r w e s p o k e a t t h e P i o P ic o pub lic h e ari ng

, I r e v isi t e d t h e P r o p o s e d R e v is e d P S D P e r m i t a nd t h e F a c t Sh e e t

Add e ndu m

. N e i t h e r d o c u m e n t r e f e r e n c e s t h e P e r m i t t ee Add r e ss

. T h e o n l y P r o p o s e d R e v is e d P S D- r e la t e d d o c u m e n t t h a t

I h a v e s ee n a n y r e f e r e n c e t o t h e a P e r m i t t e e Add r e ss i s t h e P ub lic No t ic e

. A s s u c h

, I d e ci d e d t h a t I d i d n o t n e e d t o fil e a

f o r m al c o mm e n t r e q u e s t i n g a c h a ng e t o t h e P e r m i t te e Add r e ss

. S i n c e t h a t t i m e

, h o w e v e r

, I d i d r e v isi t t h e o ri g i n al F i n al

P S D P e r m i t

, a nd i t d o e s i n f ac t lis t t h e P e r m i t te e Add r e ss as “ P

. O

. B o x 9 5 5 92

, 25 42 S i ng l e t r e e L a n e

, S o u t h J o r d a n

, U T

8 4 0 9 5

. ” In t h e e v e n t t h a t t h e F i n al R e v is e d P S D P e r m i t s h o w s t h e P e r m i t t ee Ad d r e ss, p l e a s e u s e t h e f o l l o w i ng :

P i o P i c o E n e r g y C e n te r

, L L C

c / o E n e r g y In v e s t o rs Fund s

T h r ee C h ar l e s R i v e r P l a c e

63 K e nd ric k S t r e et

, Su i t e 1 0 1

N ee dh a m

, M A 0 24 9 4

I a pp r e cia t e y o u r a t te n t i o n t o t h is a d m i n i s t ra t i v e r e qu e s t

. A l s o

, if y o u h a v e a n y t h i ng y o u c a n s h ar e o n t h e t i m i ng o f t h e

iss u a n c e o f

t h e F i n al R e v is e d P S D P e r m i t

, I w o u l d g r e a t l y a pp r e ci a te t h a t

. F ee l fr e e t o call m e if y o u p r e f e r

.

T h a n ks, a nd h a v e a Happ y N e w Y e a r!

D a v e

D a v i d J e n ki n s

3 1 7

. 4 31

. 10 0 4

d j e n ki n s @ a p e x p o w e r g r o up. c om
EXHIBIT 4.4

DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE

US$19,506.16

In consideration of receiving a loan of US$19,506.16, the undersigned, LONGBOW MINING CORP., of 699B Sierra Rose Drive, Reno, Nevada, USA, 89511, does hereby PROMISE TO PAY to FRED TSE, of 186 Stevens Drive, West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V7S 1C4, the sum of US$19,506.16 without interest, payable on demand.

The undersigned and each endorser hereof waives demand and presentment for payment, notice of dishonour, notice of nonpayment and notice of this Promissory Note

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, the 8th day of March, 2002.



	
/s/ "Kathy Wang"

Kathy Wang

Signature of Witness
	
/s/ "Ernest Cheung"

Ernest Cheung, Director

Longbow Mining Corp.
#### Beverly (Reinhard) Kapperman, Appellant, v William Reinhard, Respondent.

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Mc-Loughlin, J.H.O. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McLoughlin, J.H.O.—Support.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Nancy Hart and all other occupants, 

Appellant

No. 06-14-00103-CV v.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Rockwall County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. C114-

089). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, 

Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley 

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 8, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with this amendment to the Quarterly Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Laurie Romanak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

December 3, 2008
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    OF PERIODIC REPORT**     I, John P. D. Cato, Chairman, President and Chief Executive    Officer of The Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this    Certification:     1.     the Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of the Company for the annual period ended February 2, 2008    (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     Dated: April 1, 2008     /s/ John P. D. Cato    John P. D. Cato    Chairman, President and    Chief Executive Officer
Certifications:

I, Joseph F. Kruy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Cambex Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: March 30, 2007

/s/ Joseph F. Kruy
Joseph F. Kruy
President and Treasurer
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)
Order entered November 24, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00782-CV

EBAY INC., Appellant

V.

MARY KAY INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-1403318

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s November 20, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time 

to file a reply brief. Appellant shall file its reply brief by December 8, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Risk, Prevention and Health Behavior.                    

*Date:*                         May 2, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Monica Basco, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3220, MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-7010,                          *bascoma@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 13, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-9482 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 01-14-00965-CR

IN THE 

COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE 

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT HOUSTON

_____________________________________

ELMER ALVARADO

APPELLANT

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

APPELLEE

______________________________________

From the 248th District Court of Harris County, Texas

Cause No. 1381604

______________________________________

Appellant’s First Motion for 

Extension of Time to File Brief

______________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

ACCEPTED

01-14-00965-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/7/2015 7:04:09 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/7/2015 7:04:09 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Comes now Kyle B. Johnson, attorney appointed to represent the appellant in

these causes and files this Motion for an Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief, and

in support thereof, respectfully states to the Court as follows:

1. This appeal lies from the defendant’s conviction (by jury) for Indecency with a

Child in the case styled The State of Texas v. Elmer Alvarado, cause number 1381604. Mr.

Alvarado received 5 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice on November 20, 2014. 

2
2. The complete record in this case was filed on March 5, 2015 and the appellant’s

brief was due yesterday on April 6, 2015. 

3. Counsel is finishing up another brief at present and has had a felony trial that has

been carried for the last couple of weeks. Given these as well as counsel’s regular

docket, counsel is requesting additional time to review this record and complete the

appellant’s brief. scheduled for this week. Counsel is asking that the current due date

be extended 60 days .GIVEN THE ABOVE, Kyle B. Johnson, attorney for Elmer

Alvarado, the appellant, prays that the due date for appellant brief be extended sixty

(60) days or until June 5, 2015. 

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Kyle B. Johnson 

Kyle B. Johnson 

TBN: 10763570

929 Preston, Suite 200

Houston, Texas 77002

Tel: (713) 223-4100

Fax: (713) 224-2889

3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above document has been

forwarded to the Harris County District Attorney's Office by hand-delivering a copy to the

Fourteenth Court of Appeals on this 23rd day of February, 2015.

Allen Curry

Appellate Division 

Harris County District Attorney's Office

1201 Franklin, 6th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

 /s/ Kyle B. Johnson 

Kyle B. Johnson

4
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SEVEN

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 354

(ex Article 309 TEC)

(ex Article 309 TEC)

For the purposes of Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union on the suspension of certain rights resulting from Union membership, the member of the European Council or of the Council representing the Member State in question shall not take part in the vote and the Member State in question shall not be counted in the calculation of the one third or four fifths of Member States referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of that Article. Abstentions by members present in person or represented shall not prevent the adoption of decisions referred to in paragraph 2 of that Article.

For the adoption of the decisions referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, a qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(b) of this Treaty.

Where, following a decision to suspend voting rights adopted pursuant to paragraph 3 of Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, the Council acts by a qualified majority on the basis of a provision of the Treaties, that qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(b) of this Treaty, or, where the Council acts on a proposal from the Commission or from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, in accordance with Article 238(3)(a).

For the purposes of Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, the European Parliament shall act by a two-thirds majority of the votes cast, representing the majority of its component Members.

---