alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1424 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure the Secretary of Veterans Affairs permits the display of Fallen 

Soldier Displays in national cemeteries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 1424 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Warrior Battle3 field Cross Memorial Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR FALLEN SOLDIER DISPLAYS 

5 IN NATIONAL CEMETERIES. 

6 Section 2403 of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section: 

9 ‘‘(d)(1) Subject to standards established by the Sec10 retary, the Secretary shall permit the display of a Fallen 

11 Soldier Display in any national cemetery. 

12 ‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘Fallen Soldier Dis13 play’ means a memorial monument in honor of fallen 

14 members of the Armed Forces that may include a replica 

15 of an inverted rifle, boots, helmets, and identification 

16 tag.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 12, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Lexter Kossie#700661

William McConnell Unit

3001 South Emily Drive

Reeville, Texas 78102

April 6, 2015

lOtflf-zi

MffOPflBIMINftAf

APR §8 2015

Texas Supreme Court

Attn: Clerk

P.p.; BOX 12308, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711

RE: Court Inquiry Information or Forms

Dear Clerk:

I have good reasons to believe that my attorney

and the district attorney conspired to get me a life

sentence because I would not cop-out for an aggravated

robbery in which I did not have a gun or a weapon of any

sort. I have recently acquired an affidavit from the State's

only witness who at trial testified that she saw a brown

handle hanging out of my waistband and when the district

attorney asked her what it was she said it was a gun but

now claim that prior to trial she consistantly told the

D.;A.; prior to trial that it could have been a gun but that

she never saw a gun of any sort=..only a brown handle.

Prior to trial I consistantly told the D.;A.; and my attorney

that I did not have a gun in which the D.A. responded with

the question,."Who do you think the jury is going to believe

.-.you or that 18 year old young lady?" I never had a gun

and the only reason I went to trial was because that young

lady continued to lie about seeing a gun,

I would like for a court to conduct a court inquiry

because T believe a crime has been committed by my attorney

and the district attorney who prosecuted my case based on some

additional evidence that T have acquired since my conviction

in November of 1994.

Please send me whatever forms or information you may

have on filing a court inquiry.

Thank you for your kind assistaance.

Sincerely .-

cc:file

Lexter Kossie

Texas Lifer
----

|  | 1. | The Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 3, 2015 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June 3, 2015 | By:    | /s/ Kelly Tacke                    |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Kelly TackeChief Financial Officer |

----
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.3

          Summary of the Trust Division Bonus Plan under which one of the
          policymakers of the Parent Company is eligible to receive a
          bonus each year.
     45
<PAGE>
1995 TRUST DIVISION BONUS PLAN

The following is a summary of the Trust Division Bonus Plan for 1995:

A.  The bonus plan covers the President-Trust Division.

B.  The President-Trust Division may earn up to a maximum of 40.0% of base
    compensation.

C.  The bonus amount is earned ratably based on a tiered achievement scale
    relating to net pre-tax earnings of the Trust Division.

D.  The tiered achievement scale is negotiated between the President-Trust
    Division and the Chairman of the Board.
     46
#### Dennis J. Cooney, Respondent, v Osgood Machinery, Inc., Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Hill Acme Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; Paul Mueller Company et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

—Order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We con-*1047elude that this case is not appropriate for summary disposition. It should be determined on a full record.

All concur, except Pine, J., who dissents in part and votes to modify, in the following Memorandum.

Pine, J. (dissenting).

I must dissent in part. The majority fails to specify whether in its view the moving party failed to meet its initial burden to establish its entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law or whether in its view plaintiff has sufficiently raised an issue of fact requiring trial *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). I conclude that Supreme Court correctly denied the motion of third-party defendant Hill Acme Company (Hill) for summary judgment with respect to the cause of action of third-party plaintiff Osgood Machinery, Inc. (Osgood) alleging breach of duty to warn. However, I conclude that Supreme Court erred in denying Hill’s motion with respect to Osgood’s cause of action based on Hill’s successor corporation liability. In denying that motion, Supreme Court found that there was a question of fact whether Hill had impliedly assumed the tort liability of its predecessor, Kling Brothers Engineering Works (Kling), the manufacturer of the machine that allegedly caused plaintiff’s injuries. The purchase agreement between Hill and Kling contained no express assumption of Kling’s tort liability nor did it contain language from which an implied assumption can be inferred. Indeed, the agreement provided that Kling’s product line was sold free and clear of all "liens, claims, mortgages, and encumbrances of whatever kind and nature”, and that Hill would fulfill and comply with Kling’s warranties upon Kling’s written request, upon payment by Kling to Hill for such services. Because, under existing law in this state, the only possible basis for successor corporation liability was assumption of the predecessor corporation’s tort liability *(cf., Turner v Bituminous Cas. Co., 397*Mich 406, 244 NW2d 873; *Ray v Alad Corp.,*19 Cal 3d 22, 136 Cal Rptr 574), summary judgment should have been granted in this respect *(see, Schumacher v Richards Shear Co.,*59 NY2d 239, 244-245; *Heights v U.S. Elec. Tool Co.,*138 AD2d 369, 370). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Luby’s, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, K. Scott Gray, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                        |  |     |                                                                                    
|----------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |     |                                                                                    
|Date: November 12, 2013 |  | By: | /s/    K. SCOTTGRAY                                                                
|                        |  |     | K. Scott Gray                                                                      
|                        |  |     | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
and Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

               KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned
directors and officers of BRUSH WELLMAN INC., an Ohio corporation (the
"Corporation"), hereby constitutes and appoints Gordon D. Harnett, Carl Cramer,
Michael C. Hasychak, Leigh B. Trevor and Louis Rorimer, and each of them, their
true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution
and revocation, for them and in their names, place and stead, to sign on their
behalf as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of the
Corporation, an Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995,
and to sign any and all amendments to such Annual Report, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission granting unto said attorney or
attorneys-in-fact, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or
attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands
as of the 6th day of February, 1996.



/s/ Gordon D. Harnett                         /s/ Gerald C. McDonough
-----------------------------                 -----------------------------
Chairman, President,                          Gerald C. McDonough, Director
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


/s/ Albert C. Bersticker                      /s/ Robert M. McInnes
-----------------------------                 -----------------------------
Albert C. Bersticker, Director                Robert M. McInnes, Director


/s/ Charles  F. Brush, III                     /s/ Henry G. Piper
-----------------------------                 -----------------------------
Charles F. Brush, III, Director               Henry G. Piper, Director


/s/ Frank B. Carr                             /s/ John Sherwin, Jr.
-----------------------------                 -----------------------------
Frank B. Carr,  Director                      John Sherwin, Jr., Director


/s/ William P. Madar                          /s/ David L. Burner
-----------------------------                 -----------------------------
William P. Madar, Director                    David L. Burner, Director


/s/ Carl Cramer
-----------------------------               
Carl Cramer, Vice President
Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,058
<INVENTORY>                                     90,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,911
<PP&E>                                         463,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                 290,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 383,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,312
<BONDS>                                         17,905
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,227
<OTHER-SE>                                     214,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   383,852
<SALES>                                        433,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               433,801
<CGS>                                          320,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  397,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   153
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,471
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,874
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,597
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.56
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Salvatore DAuria, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report of Tut Systems Inc., on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tut Systems, Inc.



By:

/s/ Salvatore DAuriaSalvatore DAuria President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board


Date: May 10, 2006
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(a)

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
<PAGE>

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports
(1) dated February 15, 2002 with respect to the statutory-basis financial
statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company and (2) dated
February 1, 2002 with respect to the subaccounts of Transamerica Life Insurance
Company Separate Account VA C, which are available for investment by contract
owners of the Extra Variable Annuity, included in Post-Effective Amendment
No. 12 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-83957) and related
Prospectus of the Transamerica Extra Variable Annuity.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
April 25, 2002
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00397-CV

BETTY JANE GOSSETT,

Appellant

v.

THE ESTATE OF DONA LEE STOVALL, 

DECEASED, AND LISA JAMIESON AS THE 

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE 

OF DONA LEE STOVALL,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 2

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. P200719377-A

ORDER

This appeal was referred to mediation by order dated February 26, 2015. The 

parties to the appeal were ordered to confer with each other and attempt to agree upon 

a mediator. Further, named parties were ordered to attend the mediation. After an 

objection by a person whom the Court believed to be a party, a response was requested 

from any person or entity served with the Court’s order of referral to mediation which 
Gossett v. The Estate of Dona Lee Stovall, Deceased Page 2

contended it was not a true “party” to this appeal. Further, appellant was ordered to 

amend the docketing statement and properly note service, including the service 

address, of the amended docketing statement to each person required by the rules to be 

served, specifically each party to the judgment being appealed. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e); see 

also TEX. R. CIV. P. 21a(e).

Since the issuance of that order, we have received notification from some of the 

parties which indicated they were not parties to the appeal. Further, appellant 

amended the docketing statement to clearly indicate which parties were actual parties 

to the appeal.

Accordingly, the Court makes the following Order:

The style of this appeal is changed to Betty Jane Gossett v. The Estate of Dona Lee 

Stovall, Deceased, and Lisa Jamieson as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Dona Lee 

Stovall. Any other person or entity initially believed by the Court to be a party to this 

appeal is removed from the Court’s case management system and is not required to 

comply with the Court’s previous order of referral to mediation, dated February 26, 

2015, or any future order of the Court.

All provisions of the mediation order dated February 26, 2015, remain in effect 

for Betty Jane Gossett, the Estate of Dona Lee Stovall, and Lisa Jamieson as the personal 

representative of the Estate of Dona Lee Stovall, including the provision that mediation 

must occur within thirty days after the date the notice agreeing to a mediator is filed. 
Gossett v. The Estate of Dona Lee Stovall, Deceased Page 3

Because appellant indicated in her amended docketing statement, filed on April 

1, 2015, that the parties could agree on a mediator and named a mediator, the parties 

are ordered to mediate with Wade H. McMullen whose contact information is as 

follows:

6300 Ridgelea Place

Suite 509

Fort Worth, TX 76116

(817)731-4163

Mediation must occur within thirty days after the date the amended docketing 

statement was filed.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed April 16, 2015
Protected

& enforced by law

Inspected

by experts

Shaped

by public input

from Farm to Store

Organic 

Integrity

Traced

from farm to store

Protected

& enforced by law

Inspected

by experts

Traced

from farm to store

Shaped

by public input

Protected

by law

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

Final.pdf 5 2/23/2024 9:32:35 AM
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VIII

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

CHAPTER 4

PROVISIONS SPECIFIC TO MEMBER STATES WHOSE CURRENCY IS THE EURO

Article 137

Arrangements for meetings between ministers of those Member States whose currency is the euro are laid down by the Protocol on the Euro Group.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE IV

FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL

FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL

CHAPTER 1

WORKERS

Article 47

(ex Article 41 TEC)

(ex Article 41 TEC)

Member States shall, within the framework of a joint programme, encourage the exchange of young workers.

---
|   | (1) | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended      October 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      January 28, 2010 |   |
|------------------------------|--------|

|   | /s/  WILLIAM      L. BRIDGFORD |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   | William      L. Bridgford,               |
|   | Chairman      of the Board               |
|   | (Principal      Executive Officer)       |
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 10982 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ROBERT DANIEL ARGUETA

- LOPEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08

- CR

- 25

- 1

Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Robert Daniel Argueta

- Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). A rgueta

- Lopez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 17, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-10982 Document: 00512665910 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2014No. 13

- 10982
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, co unsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-10982 Document: 00512665910 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2014
3/25/2015

BARKER, CORA BELL

On this day, the application for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as moot.

v ' f <' *' Abel Acosta, Clerk

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308,CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

©FFJCGAL BUSINESS* " ^sS9PQ8««

STATE OF TEX&^l'l

PENALTY F0f^

PRIVATE USE"**

. O* «r

<%/'

Tr.Ct. NO2075S2X

\

02 1R

0006557458 MAR26 20it

MAILED FROM ZIJ?£PQE 78701

WR-83,003-01

CORA BELL BARKER f

TDC# 1666355 ^^J

(^