### 55772 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Notices

3 As a result of electing to utilize Appendix A to Subpart B of Part 430 prior to the September 15, 2014 effective date to measure the energy consumption of its new basic hybrid model, testing of the refrigerated beverage compartment will be

conducted at 39 ° F as specified in Appendix A, as opposed to 38 °F as specified in Appendix A1 and under which PAPRSA’s waiver hybrid models were previously certified.

4 Available at http://www.gc.energy.gov/ documents/LargeCapacityRCW

_guidance

_ 122210.pdf. for determining the energy consumption of basic hybrid model SR5180JBC. See Federal Register , Vol. 78, No. 180,

57139–41.

2. Request to Extend Scope of Previously Granted Waivers and Interim Waivers to New Basic Hybrid Model under Previously Approved Alternative Testing Procedure

As indicated above, PAPRSA has developed a new basic hybrid model, PR5180JKBC , that shares the same design characteristics that led DOE to approve PAPRSA’s two prior petitions for waiver. This new basic hybrid model is a single cabinet hybrid model that would be classified as a compact refrigerator with automatic defrost without through-the-door ice service,
but which has a wine-chiller compartment designed for an average temperature of 55 to 57 ° F. Just as PAPRSA’s waiver hybrid models, this new basic hybrid model contains a heater that makes it impossible for the temperature of the wine-chiller compartment to reach a temperature
below 45 ° F. Thus, testing this new hybrid model at 39 ° F is simply not possible and not representative of the energy consumption characteristics of this new basic hybrid model.

Further, this new basic hybrid model, just as PAPRSA’s waiver hybrid models, will have a door-opening usage aligned with household freezers, thus 0.85 should also be the employed K factor (correction factor) for this basic hybrid
model. See Appendix B1 to Subpart 430, 5.2.1.1, because Subpart 430 does not recognize wine chiller as a category.

In short, there are no material
differences between this new basic hybrid model and PAPRSA’s waiver hybrid models as it impacts this Request. The design differences between the new basic hybrid model and the waiver hybrid models are the
introduction of a more efficient compressor and new external electronic controls. Although the new basic hybrid model will be more energy efficient, the design characteristics of the new basic hybrid model are the same as the
characteristics of PAPRSA’s waiver hybrid models that led DOE to grant the prior two waivers. Accordingly, PAPRSA respectfully requests that it be permitted to use the following testing procedure for its new basic hybrid
model:

Energy consumption is defined by the higher of the two values calculated by the following two formulas (according to 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, Appendix A): Energy consumption of the wine compartment: EWine = (ET1 + [(ET2–ET1) × (55 ° F– TW1)/(TW2–TW1)]) *0.85 Energy consumption of the refrigerated beverage compartment: EBeverage Compartment = ET1 + [(ET2– ET1) × (39 ° F–TBC1)/(TBC2– TBC1)]. 3 Accordingly, PAPRSA respectfully requests that DOE extend the waivers that DOE previously granted it and that PAPRSA be permitted to use this approved alternative testing method to test, certify and rate the new basic hybrid models in the same manner as its waiver hybrid models subject to the existing waivers.

3. Grounds for Interim Waiver

Pursuant to 10 CFR part 430.27(b)(2), applicants for an interim waiver should address the likely success of their petition and what economic hardships and/or competitive disadvantages are likely to arise absent the grant of an

interim waiver.

As detailed above, it is highly likely that DOE will grant this Request, as PAPRSA is simply seeking to test a new basic hybrid model under the alternative testing procedure already approved twice by DOE for PAPRSA’s other hybrid models subject to the existing waivers. The new basic hybrid models contain no materially different design characteristics that should
warrant a different result.

Further, as DOE has previously stated, ‘‘[f]ully recognizing that product development occurs faster than the test procedure rulemaking process, the Department’s rules permit
manufacturers of models not contemplated by the test procedures . . . to petition for a test procedure waiver in order to certify, rate, and sell
such models.’’ GC Enforcement Guidance on the Application of Waivers and on the Waiver Process at 2 (rel. Dec. 23, 2010); 4 see also DOE FAQ Guidance Regarding Coverage of Wine Chillers,
Etc. in the R/F Standard/Test Procedure at 2 (rel. Feb. 10, 2011) (‘‘DOE recognizes the potential disparity in treatment among these hybrid products.
As DOE indicated

. . . , the Department plans to engage in a future rulemaking to more comprehensively address these types of products.’’).

Certain manufacturers design comparable hybrid models so that the beverage center compartment does not
reach below 40 ° F, and thus are not covered products under DOE’s regulations. Unless PAPRSA is granted an interim waiver, it will be at a competitive disadvantage by being
unable to introduce the new basic hybrid model to compete with manufacturers that design their hybrid
models in a manner that falls outside of DOE’s jurisdiction.

Thus, given that this Request is likely to be granted and PAPRSA will face economic hardship unless an interim waiver is granted, permitting PAPRSA to immediately certify the new basic hybrid model under the alternative testing method already approved by DOE is in the public interest.

Respectfully submitted,

Alan G. Fishel

Adam D. Bowser
Arent Fox LLP, 1717 K St. NW., Washington, DC 20036–5369, (202) 857–6450, fishel.alan@ arentfox.com, bowser.adam@arentfox.com, Counsel for Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration Systems Corporation of

America July 2, 2014

[FR Doc. 2014–22175 Filed 9–16–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6450–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY**

**Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy** 

**[Case No. RF–040]**

**Notice of Petition for Waiver of Sub Zero From the Department of Energy**  **Residential Refrigerator and Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedure** 
**and Grant of Interim Waiver**

**AGENCY :**  Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

**ACTION :**  Notice of Petition for Waiver, Notice of Granting Application for Interim Waiver, and Request for Public

Comments.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces receipt and publication of a petition for waiver submitted by the Sub-Zero Group, Inc. from specified portions of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) test procedure for determining the energy consumption of electric refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers. Sub-Zero’s request pertains to the specific hybrid refrigerated ‘‘storage-wine storage’’ basic models set forth in its petition. Sub-Zero


### 55773 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Notices

1 For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code, Part B was re-designated Part A. seeks permission to use an alternate test procedure to test the wine chiller compartment of these devices at 55 ° F instead of the prescribed temperature of

39 ° F. That procedure would apply a K factor (correction factor) value of 0.85 when calculating the energy consumption of a tested model and replace the energy consumption calculation currently required under 10 CFR Part 430, Appendix A. DOE solicits comments, data, and information concerning Sub-Zero’s petition and the suggested alternate test procedure. Today’s notice also grants Sub-Zero
with an interim waiver from the electric refrigerator-freezer test procedure, subject to use of the alternative test procedure set forth in this notice.

**DATES :**  DOE will accept comments, data,and information with respect to the SubZero Petition until October 17, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by case number ‘‘RF–040,’’ by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Email: AS

_ Waiver

_Requests@ ee.doe.gov. Include the case number [Case No. RF–040] in the subject line of the message.

• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–5B/ 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–2945. Please submit one signed original paper copy.

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20024. Please submit one signed original paper copy.

Docket: For access to the docket to review the background documents relevant to this matter, you may visit the U.S. Department of Energy, 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20024; (202) 586–2945, between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Available documents include the following items: (1) This notice; (2) public comments received; (3) the petition for waiver and application for interim waiver; and (4) prior DOE rulemakings regarding similar refrigerator-freezers. Please call
Ms. Brenda Edwards at the above telephone number for additional
information.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mr. Bryan Berringer, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mail Stop EE–5B, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–0371. Email: Bryan.Berringer@ee.doe.gov.

Mr. Michael Kido, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, Mail Stop GC–71, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585–0103. Telephone: (202) 586–8145. Email: Michael.Kido@hq.doe.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. Background and Authority

Title III, Part B of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), Public Law 94–163 (42 U.S.C. 6291– 6309, as codified), established the Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products Other Than Automobiles, a program covering most major household appliances, which includes the electric refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers that are the focus of
this notice. 1 Part B includes definitions, test procedures, labeling provisions, energy conservation standards, and the authority to require information and reports from manufacturers. Further, Part B authorizes the Secretary of Energy to prescribe test procedures that are reasonably designed to produce results which measure the energy efficiency, energy use, or estimated annual operating costs of a covered product, and that are not unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) The test procedure for electric refrigerators and electric refrigerator-freezers is contained in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix A.

The regulations set forth in 10 CFR 430.27, which were recently amended, contain provisions that enable a person to petition DOE to obtain a waiver from the test procedure requirements for covered products. See 79 FR 26591 (May 9, 2014) (revising 10 CFR 430.27, effective June 9, 2014). (DOE notes that while the previous version of 10 CFR
430.27 was effective at the time of SubZero’s submission, the substantive aspects of this regulation have not been changed by the May 9th rule.) Under 10 CFR 430.27, the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (the Assistant Secretary) will grant a waiver if it is determined that the basic model for which the petition
for waiver was submitted contains one or more design characteristics that prevents testing of the basic model according to the prescribed test procedures, or if the prescribed test procedures may evaluate the basic model in a manner so unrepresentative of its true energy consumption characteristics as to provide materially inaccurate comparative data. 10 CFR 430.27(l). Petitioners must include in their petition any alternate test procedures known to the petitioner to
evaluate the basic model in a manner representative of its energy consumption. DOE may grant the waiver subject to conditions, including adherence to alternate test procedures. 10 CFR 430.27(l). Waivers remain in effect pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 430.27(m).

The waiver process also allows the Assistant Secretary to grant an interim waiver from test procedure requirements to manufacturers that have petitioned DOE for a waiver of such prescribed test procedures. 10 CFR 430.27(g). An interim waiver remains in effect for 180 days or until DOE issues its determination on the petition for waiver, whichever occurs earlier. DOE may extend an interim waiver for an additional 180 days. 10 CFR 430.27(h).

II. Petition for Waiver of Test Procedure

Sub-Zero is seeking a waiver from the test procedure applicable to residentialelectric refrigerators and refrigeratorfreezers set forth in 10 CFR part 430, Subpart B, Appendix A. In its petition, Sub-Zero explained that it produces a hybrid refrigerator basic model (i.e. refrigerators that have a combination of one or more refrigerated storage compartments and a wine storage compartment). Sub-Zero asserts that the DOE test procedure does not contain a method to test these types of hybrid products in a manner that would ‘‘truly represent[ ] the energy-consumption characteristics of these products’’ and offered an alternate test procedure that Sanyo E&E Corporation (Sanyo), now Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration Systems Corporation of America (PAPRSA), used in prior waiver requests. See 77 FR 49443 (Aug. 16, 2012) and 78 FR 57139 (Sept. 17, 2013). (On October 4, 2012, a correction notice to the August 16, 2012 Decision and Order was published. See 77 FR 60688.) These earlier decisions incorporated a K factor (correction factor) value of 0.85 when calculating the energy consumption of a tested model (77 FR 60688). Sub-Zero is requesting that it be permitted to apply the same procedure when testing the energy usage of its hybrid refrigerated storage-wine storage
models.

Against this background, DOE had previously issued guidance in 2011 that clarified the test procedures to be usedfor hybrid products such as the SubZero models at issue. That guidance is available at the following link: http:// www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ appliance

_standards/residential/pdfs/


### 55774 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Notices

refrigerator

_ definition

_ faq.pdf . The guidance specifies that basic models that do not have a separate wine storage compartment with a separate exterior door, such as those models identified in Sub-Zero’s petition, are to be tested using the DOE test procedure in Appendix A, with the temperatures specified therein. Sub-Zero’s waiver request seeks to replace the application of this general guidance with the more recent and specific approach outlined in determinations for similar hybrid products offered by Sanyo and PAPRSA when measuring the efficiency of these products.

Sub-Zero also requests an interim waiver from the existing DOE test procedure. An interim waiver may be granted if it is determined that the applicant will experience economic hardship if the application for interim waiver is denied, if it appears likely that the petition for waiver will be granted, and/or the Assistant Secretary
determines that it would be desirable for public policy reasons to grant immediate relief pending a determination of the petition for waiver. See 10 CFR 430.27(g).

For the reasons discussed above, DOE has determined that use of the currently required DOE test procedure would provide test results so unrepresentative as to provide materially inaccurate comparative data. Therefore, it appears likely that Sub-Zero’s petition for waiver will be granted. For these same reasons, DOE has also determined that it is desirable for public policy reasons to grant Sub-Zero immediate relief pending a determination of the petition for waiver. DOE grants Sub-Zero’s application for interim waiver fromtesting of its hybrid refrigerated storagewine storage basic models.

Therefore, it is ordered that: The application for interim waiver filed by Sub-Zero is hereby granted forSub-Zero’s hybrid refrigerated storagewine storage basic product lines are subject to the following specifications
and conditions below. Sub-Zero shall be required to test and rate its hybrid refrigerated storage-wine storage product line according to the alternate test procedure as set forth in section III, ‘‘Alternate test procedure.’’

The following basic models are included in Sub-Zero’s petition:

IW–30R DOE makes decisions on waivers for only those models specifically set out in the petition, not future models that maybe manufactured by the petitioner. SubZero may submit a subsequent petition
for waiver for additional models ofelectric refrigerators and refrigeratorfreezers for which it seeks a waiver from the DOE test procedure. In addition, DOE notes that the grant of a waiver does not release a petitioner from the certification requirements set forth at 10 CFR part 429.

Further, this interim waiver is conditioned upon the presumed validity of statements, representations, and documents provided by the petitioner. DOE may revoke or modify this interim waiver at any time upon a
determination that the factual basis underlying the petition for waiver is incorrect, or upon a determination that
the results from the alternate test procedure are unrepresentative of the basic models’ true energy consumption
characteristics.

III. Alternate Test Procedure

Sub-Zero submitted an alternate test procedure to account for the energy consumption of its hybrid refrigerated storage-wine storage products. That alternate procedure would test this product according to the procedure specified in appendix A to subpart B of 10 CFR part 430 except with a standardized temperature for the wine chiller compartment of 55 ° F, instead of the prescribed 39 ° F. Sub-Zero shall also use the K factor (correction factor) value of 0.85 when calculating the energy consumption of the model listed and calculate the energy consumption of this
model as follows:

Energy consumption is defined by the higher of the two values calculated by the following two formulas (according to 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, Appendix A):

Energy consumption of the wine
compartment:

E Wine = ET1 + [(ET2–ET1) × (55 ° F– TW1)/(TW2–TW1)] *0.85 Energy consumption of the refrigerated beverage compartment:

E Refrigerated Compartment = ET1 + [(ET2–ET1)

× (39 ° F–TRC1)/(TRC2–TRC1)].

IV. Summary and Request for

Comments

Through today’s notice, DOE grants
Sub-Zero an interim waiver from the specified portions of the test procedure applicable to Sub-Zero’s line of hybrid refrigerated storage-wine storage basicmodels and announces receipt of SubZero’s petition for waiver from those same portions of the test procedure. DOE is publishing Sub-Zero’s petition for waiver in its entirety. The petition
contains no confidential information. The petition includes a suggested alternate test procedure to determine the energy consumption of Sub-Zero’s specified hybrid refrigerators. Sub-Zero is required to follow this alternate procedure as a condition of its interim waiver, and DOE is considering including this alternate procedure in its subsequent Decision and Order.

DOE solicits comments from interested parties on all aspects of the petition, including the suggested alternate test procedure and calculation methodology. Any person submitting
written comments to DOE must also send a copy of such comments to the petitioner. The contact information for the petitioner is: Paul V. Sikir, VicePresident of Design Engineering, SubZero Group, Inc., 4717 Hammersley Road, Madison, Wisconsin 53711. All
submissions received must include the agency name and case number for this proceeding. Submit electronic comments in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, Portable Document Format (PDF), or text (American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII)) file format and avoid the use of special characters or any form of encryption. Wherever possible, include the electronic signature of the author. DOE does not accept telefacsimiles (faxes).

Issued in Washington, DC, on September

10, 2014. Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. SUB-ZERO GROUP, INC. 4717 Hammersley Road Madison, WI 53711 May 19th, 2014

The Honorable David Danielson Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy

Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20585 Dear Secretary Danielson:

Pursuant to 10 CFR 430.27, Sub-Zero respectfully requests expedited
attention to this Petition for both an interim and final waiver to modify the DOE test procedure (10 CFR 430 Subpart B Appendix A) for Sub-Zero hybrid refrigerated storage-wine storage products. Without this waiver, we are unable to certify models as compliant with new DOE minimum efficiency standards effective in 2014. This request is similar to past petitions for waivers that have been granted by DOE to Sanyo (77FR49443) and PAPRSA (78FR35894).

The Department’s regulations provide that the Assistant Secretary will grant a Petition upon ‘‘determination that the
basic model for which the waiver was requested contains a design characteristic which either prevents testing of the basic model according to the prescribed test procedures, or the


### 55775 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Notices

prescribed test procedures may evaluate
the basic model in a manner so unrepresentative of its true energy consumption characteristics as to provide materially inaccurate comparative data.’’ Sub-Zero requests that the Assistant Secretary grant this petition on both grounds.

In granting the Sanyo petition, DOE acknowledged that wine storage compartments cannot be tested at the prescribed temperature of 38 ° F (now 39

° F in the revised Refrigerator Test Procedure), because the minimum wine compartment temperature is higher. Sanyo submitted an alternate test procedure to account for the energy consumption of its wine storage/ beverage center models. That alternate procedure would test the wine storage
compartment at 55 ° F, instead of the prescribed 38 °F. To justify the use of this standardized temperature for testing; Sanyo stated in its petition that it designed these models to provide an average wine compartment temperature
of 55 to 57 °F, which it determined is a commonly recommended temperature for wine storage. This temperature is presumed to be representative of expected consumer use. DOE also noted that the test procedures for wine products adopted by the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM), California Energy Commission (CEC), and Natural Resources Canada all use the standardized temperature of 55

° F for wine storage compartments; consistent with Sanyo’s petition. Furthermore, DOE prescribed that Sanyo also use the proposed K factor (correction factor) value of 0.85 when calculating energy consumption.

DOE granted Sanyo’s waiver petition in 2012, acknowledging that the existing test procedure cannot properly measure the energy consumed in actual consumer usage. Thereafter in 2013, DOE granted PAPRSA’s similar waiver application.

Sub-Zero is a family-owned company that has been headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin for over 65 years. Sub-Zero developed the niche market
for customized built-in residential refrigeration and manufactures all our products in the United States, with
factories in Wisconsin and Arizona. While technically not a ‘‘smallbusiness’’ using DOE’s definition, SubZero is a small producer of refrigeration products striving to compete in an age of large, multi-national manufacturers and is one of the few remaining U.S. companies that produce all of its products here in the U.S. The company’s future viability is clearly threatened by this situation and we sincerely ask DOE to grant immediate
relief.

Issues with the DOE Test Procedure

Sub-Zero is requesting a waiver to the test procedures for its hybrid models
that consist of a combination of one or more refrigerated storage compartments and a wine storage compartment. While DOE considers such hybrid models as covered products, there is no current DOE test procedure appropriate to these hybrid models. Therefore, the current testing requirements do not measure energy usage in a manner that truly represents the energy-consumption characteristics of these products. Further, it is not even possible to test these models under the existing testing procedures. DOE fully recognizes these issues associated with testing hybrid wine products and has initiated a rulemaking to address these products in the future. Therefore Sub-Zero requests
this waiver until such time as DOE’s rulemaking is complete.

As explained in the Sanyo petition,
wine connoisseurs recommend an average of 55–57 °F for the long term storage of wine, and Sub-Zero has also designed the wine storage compartments of its products with this ideal average temperature in mind.
Since various wines have different ideal drinking temperatures, products are designed such that the wine storage compartment can achieve a range of temperatures above 39 ° F. DOE’s test procedures (10 CFR 430 Subpart B Appendix A) specify that energy consumption be determined at a compartment temperature of 39 ° F and therefore cannot apply to a product that is designed to be incapable of achieving this temperature. Further, as described in the Sanyo petition, hybrid models will typically have door-opening usage aligned with household freezers and wine storage products. Thus, the K factor (correction factor) of .85 from
CAN/CSA 300–08 6.3.1.2 and AHAM/
ANSI HRF–1 should be used to determine energy consumption.

Proposed Modified Test Procedure

As in the two previously granted petitions, the wine storage compartment
shall be tested at 55 ° F.

Sub Zero shall use the K factor (correction factor) value of 0.85 when calculating the energy consumption of
the models listed below.

The energy consumption is defined by the higher of the two values calculated by the following two formulas (according to 10 CFR Part 430, subpart B, Appendix A):

Energy consumption of the wine
compartment: E Wine = ET1 + [(ET2

¥ ET1) × (55

° F

¥ TW1)/(TW2

¥ TW1)] *0.85 Energy consumption of the refrigerated compartment:

E Refrigerated Compartment = ET1 + [(ET2

¥ ET1) × (39 °F

¥ TRC1)/ (TRC2

¥ TRC1)].

Affected Models

The basic models of Sub-Zero hybrid refrigerated storage-wine storage products affected are:

IW–30R

In conclusion, this is a critical issue for our company and we request that DOE expedite the handling of this petition for an interim and final waiver. Sub-Zero would be pleased to discuss this waiver petition with DOE and provide any additional information that the Department might require. We will also notify all manufacturers known to us of similar domestically marketed products of this waiver petition.

Sincerely,

Paul V. Sikir Vice President of Design Engineering

Via email: AS

_ Waiver

_Requests@ ee.doe.gov

[FR Doc. 2014–22227 Filed 9–16–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6450–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY**

**Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy** 

**[Case No. RF–042]**

**Petition for Waiver of GE Appliances From the Department of Energy**  **Residential Refrigerator and Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedure** 
**and Grant of Interim Waiver**

**AGENCY :**  Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

**ACTION :**  Notice of Petition for Waiver, Notice of Granting Application for Interim Waiver, and Request for Public

Comments.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces receipt of a petition for waiver from GE Appliances (GE) seeking an exemption from specified portions of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) test procedure for determining the energy consumption of electric refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers. GE seeks to use an alternate test procedure to address certain issues involved in testing certain specific basic models identified in itspetition that are equipped with dualcompressor systems that GE contends cannot be accurately tested using the currently applicable DOE test