alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To: Court of Criminal Appeals

ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK

P.O. Box 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

n<m STEPHEN JAY SANDBLOOM

TDCJ-CIDE No. #1757517

ALLEN B. POLUNSKY UNIT

3872 FM 350 SOUTH

LIVINGSTON, TEXAS 77351

•OP>

Ref: No. WR-79,922-02

Cause no. 10 DCR-053774A-HC2

400th DISTRICT COURT, FORT BEND COUNTY

Please find enclosed a copy of notice of mandamus directed to the 400th court

, Fort Bend County.

Also be advised that the 400th District Court is currently in violation of

the court of criminal appeals of Texas' order dated, December 10,2014, and

also rule of appellate procedure 73, which expired on March 21,2015. Tll^B.

The defendants prayer for relief in this matter remains the same as when filed

September 22,2014.

Thanli you for your help in this matter.

RECEIVED!,

OOUffTOFCRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 16 2015

Ab®IAe0Sli,C/8rk

Respectfully,

zJZtftffo^ m^ <fflst*/wr*< STEPHEN UAY SANDBLOOM
No. 10-DCR-053774 A HC2

EX PARTE § IN THE TEXAS

STEPHEN JAY SANDBLOOM § COURT OF

§ CRIMINAL APPEALS

NOmCElOF MANDAMOS

1. Petitioner STEPHEN JAY SANDBLOOM file this notice of mandamus pursuant to

Tex. R. Civ. Proc. Rule 694 No Mandamus With Notice* and state's that the

Petitioner intends to file this mandamus due to the denial of recorder records

, and the trial court's failure to provide the petitioner with the relief that

he seeks in his appeal.

2. Petitioner sandbloom intends to file this mandamus with the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals*

3. This case is currently pending in the court of Criminal Appeals as a result

of the petitioner's writ of habeas corpus filed in the 400th Judicial District

court of Fart BehdiiCounty/ Texas.

3"fc*U^J^

Stephen Jay Sandbloom

TDCJ-CID No. 1757517

Allen B. Polunsky

3872 FM 350 South

Livingston* Texas 77351
Dates APtlL <f, .lOiS^-

Stephen Jay Sandbloom

T43GJ-CID Ho. 1757517

Allen B. Poluriiiky Unit

3872 m 350 South

Livingston* Texas 77351

Re: No.lO-DGR-053774 A HC2

Ms. Annie Rebecca Elliott

Clerk Fort Bend County Texas

301 Jackson St*

Richmond* Texas 77469

Ex Parte Stephen Jay Sandbloom

Dear: Ma.Elliott

Please find enclosed one copy and an original Notice of Mandamus*

Please fit© stamp the copy and return it to me and file the original with

the trial court. Thank you for your kind help and assistance in this matter*
CERTIFICATE Of SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Note of Mandamus has been served on the

Honorable Judge Maggie Perez-tfaramillo of the 400th Judicial District Court

of Fort Bend County* Texas* and by filing it with the District Clerks office*

Ms. Annie Rebecca Elliott* 301 Jackson St* Richmond* Texas 77469/ and by

placing it in the U.S. mailbox of the Allen B» Polunsky Unit* TDCJ* 3872 FM

350 South* Livingston* Texas 77351* and on thi® the o —~ day of AP/Z/t—

2015.

He

Stephen Jay Sandbloom

TDCJ-CID No. 1757517
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Aventura  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Craig
A.  Waltzer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  my  knowledge:

(1)     The  report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



May  12,  2006          By:     /s/  Craig  A.  Waltzer
                                -----------------------
                                Craig  A.  Waltzer
                                Chief  Executive  Officer,  President  and
                                Director
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 3.30


                       CERTIFICATE OF RETIREMENT OF STOCK

          LEXINGTON PRECISION CORPORATION, a corporation organized and

existing as under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware ("the

Corporation"),

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

                  FIRST: That the Corporation acquired an aggregate of Four
Hundred Fifty (450) shares of the Corporation's $4 - $8 Cumulative Convertible
Preferred Stock, Series B, par value $100 per share, which shares had capital
applied in connection with their acquisition and which shares upon their
acquisition became retired shares.

                  SECOND: That the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation prohibits the reissue of the shares of $4 - $8 Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B, when so retired; and pursuant to the
provisions of Section 243 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, upon the effective date of the filing of this certificate as therein
provided, the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be
amended so as to effect a reduction in the authorized number of shares of the $4
- $8 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B, to the extent of Four
Hundred Fifty (450) shares, being the total number of shares retired with a par
value of $100 per share, and an aggregate par value of $45,000.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this 

certificate to be signed by Dennis J. Welhouse, its Senior Vice President and

Assistant Secretary, and attested to by Kelly L. MacMillan, its Treasurer, this

6th day of January, 1997.

                                        LEXINGTON PRECISION CORPORATION

                                        By:      Dennis J. Welhouse
                                                 -------------------
                                                 Dennis J. Welhouse
                                                 Senior Vice President and
                                                 Assistant Secretary

ATTEST:

By:    Kelly L. MacMillan
       --------------------
       Kelly L. MacMillan
       Treasurer
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: January

25 , 201 5 TO: 111(b) Rule for New Construction of Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013 - 0495 FROM: Howard J. Hoffman , EPA - OGC SUBJECT: December 11, 2014 Telephone Call with Profs. Freeman and Gerard Regarding

Proposed 111(b) Rule for New Construction of Power Plants On December 11, 2014, Lorie Schmidt, Elliott Zenick, Scott Jordan, Steven Silverman, and Howard J. Hoffman of EPA- OGC met by telephone with Jody

Freeman of Harvard Law School and Michael Gerrard of Columbia Climate Center to discuss legal issues concerning the proposed CAA section 111(b) rule for new construction of power plants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF CAPITAL TRUST FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              49,268
<SECURITIES>                                        61,465
<RECEIVABLES>                                      202,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                           462
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     3,954
<PP&E>                                                 450
<DEPRECIATION>                                          93
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     317,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                5,718
<BONDS>                                            168,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               12,268
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            18,157
<OTHER-SE>                                         112,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       317,366
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     8,450
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       12,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       462
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (4502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            55
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (4,557)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (4557)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.63)
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Douglas MacLeod, certify that:

 

1.            Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered bythis report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2022-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.            Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.            Iam responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted inpreparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.            Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance withItem 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

 

 

 

 

March 30, 2023
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6056

ANGELO C. CONGO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CENTRAL

CLASSIFICATION BUREAU; COURT AND LEGAL MANAGERS; LAUREL A. CORNER; LOU ANN WHITE; DORIS

HEUEING,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CA-96-279-AM)

Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: May 2, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo C. Congo, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We also deny Congo's motion for appointment of counsel. See

Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163 (4th Cir. 1984) (providing

standard).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.* Congo v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections,

No. CA-96-279-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE

SPECIALTY CROPS PROGRAM

REPORT ON SANITARY INSPECTION

To Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), this is to report that representative samples of:

COUNT OF CONTAINERS: COMMODITY: TO ACCOMPANY EXPORT FORM CERTIFICATE:

No.

CAR NO.: TRAILER NO.: PLI/STATE LOT: 

APPLICANT: LOCATION (CITY/STATE): DATE INSPECTED: 

Based on an examination of representative samples taken from the above-described lot, it is 

percent infestation.

SAMPLE RATE:

☐ Sample Rate of: %

☐ Per Hypergeometric Table

☐ Composite Sample: __________________________________

found to be substantially free from insects with 0 

REMARKS:

This form completed per Joint AMS/APHIS Memo on Proper Use of Report of Sanitary Inspection (7/22/16)

INSPECTOR’S SIGNATURE: DATE ISSUED:

WARNING: This report is not a sanitary certificate and must not be used to accompany shipments of fruit to foreign countries. It is merely a 

statement of findings which will assist inspectors of PPQ to issue sanitary certificates at the point of departure.

For limitations on the acceptability of this report as a basis for foreign certification, see instructions on issuing Export Form Certificates and various 

sanitary memoranda and information issued by PPQ on the import restrictions on fruits and vegetables of some foreign countries.

SC-294 (05/18) Destroy previous editions. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
FORMAL RECOMMENDATION BY THE

NATIONAL ORGANIC STANDARDS BOARD (NOSB) 

TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIC PROGRAM (NOP) 

Date: April 29, 2010

Subject: _2011 Sunset Recommendation for Ferric Phosphate (CAS# 10045-86-0) ___ 

Chair: Daniel G. Giacomini__ 

 

Recommendation

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action: X 

Guidance Statement: 

Other: X 

Summary Statement of the Recommendation (including Recount of Vote): The NOSB voted 

14 yes, 0 no with one member absent to renew Ferric Phosphate (CAS#10045-86-0) on 205.601 

(h) As slug or snail bait. 

NOSB Vote: Motion: Tina Ellor Second: Jeff Moyer 

Board vote: Yes - 14 No- 0 Abstain- 0 Absent - 1 

Summary Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with OFPA and 

NOP): There were many comments supporting the relisting of this material and no comments 

opposed to it. Please see the attached recommendation for committee discussions. 

Response by the NOP:
I. List: § 205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop 

production. 

II. Category Use 

(h) As slug or snail bait. Ferric phosphate (CAS # 10045–86–0). 

III & IV. Committee Summary and recommendation: There is a petition in front of the 

Crops Committee to remove this material from the National list. The Crops 

Committee requested new technical information pending in consideration of 

this petition in January of 2009 including the following questions: 

 

1. Does Ferric Phosphate stand alone as snail bait as it is listed in CFR 

205.601(h) "As slug or snail bait. Ferric phosphate (CAS#10045-86-0)" or 

does it require stabilizer to function as a viable product for sale for farm 

use? 

2. If stabilizers are used in Ferric Phosphate for slug and snail bait, what are 

they? 

3. Ferric Phosphate is not allowed in other organic standards around the 

world. What alternative materials and/or methods are used for slug or 

snail bait that make Ferric phosphate unnecessary? 

We have not yet received the updated information that we requested. There was a lot of 

discussion in the Crops Committee surrounding the relisting of this material because of 

the alternatives available and that it appears that this material does not exist in an active 

form on its own. A majority of the CC felt that the material should be relisted pending 

review of the petition to remove, and a minority felt that we had enough information to 

recommend that Ferric Phosphate be removed from The List. 

Because of the lag time between recommendations and rule making, the committee is 

recommending relisting of this material until review of the petition to remove is complete. 

(h) As slug or snail bait. Ferric phosphate (CAS # 10045–86–0). 

Moved: Tina E. Seconded: Jeff M. Vote: Yes: 4; No: 2; Absent: 1; Recuse: 0 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Tina Ellor 

Crops Committee Chair
#### Leonard Mastro, Respondent, v Peter Maiorino et al., Defendants, and Town of Oyster Bay, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Peter Maiorino et al., Plaintiffs, v Leonard Mastro, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Defendant; Town of Oyster Bay, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

—In two related actions to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, the Town of Oyster Bay, a defendant in Action Number 1 and a third-party defendant in Action Number 2 appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), entered December 20, 1989, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in Action Number 1 insofar as it is asserted against it, the third-party complaint in Action Number 2 insofar as it is asserted against it, and all cross claims against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion is granted, the complaint in Action Number 1 and the third-party complaint in Action Number 2 are dismissed insofar as they are asserted against the Town of Oyster Bay, all cross claims against it are dismissed, and Action Number 1 against the remaining defendants is severed.

*655In order to make out a prima facie case of negligence, a plaintiff must first establish the existence of a duty owed *(see, Solomon v City of New York,*66 NY2d 1026, 1027; *Akins v Glen Falls City School Dist.,*53 NY2d 325, 333). Highway Law § 327 provides: "The town board of any town * * * may * * * provide for lighting dangerous portions of any road or highway * * *. The board may * * * at any time discontinue the lighting of any road”. Thus, the Town is under no duty to provide lighting on public highways *(see, Bauer v Town of Hempstead,*143 AD2d 793; *Dodd v Warren,*132 Misc 2d 541).

In the absence of any duty to provide lighting, and in view of the Town’s authority to discontinue, at any time, any lights which the Town, at its discretion, chose to install, there can be no liability for failure to maintain such lighting once installed, for a failure amounts to nothing more than the "withholding [of] a benefit” *(Moch Co. v Rensselaer Water Co.,*247 NY 160, 167). Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
              FROM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONDENSED
              CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND NOTES TO CONDENSED
              CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
              ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          33,950
<SECURITIES>                                    24,989
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                       504
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,321
<PP&E>                                          37,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,065
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,252
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,232
<SALES>                                         38,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,033
<CGS>                                            2,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,206 <F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,271 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (353)<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    610
<INCOME-TAX>                                       226
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                384
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       384
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
<FN>
<F1>MINORITY INTEREST SHARE OF NET INCOME AND LOSS ON EQUITY JOINT VENTURES
<F2>REPRESENTS NET INTEREST INCOME
<F3>INCLUDES RESTRUCTURING CHARGES OF 5,561,000 (.23 PER DILUTED SHARE)
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 7

SECTION 7

THE COURT OF AUDITORS

Article 285

(ex Article 246 TEC)

(ex Article 246 TEC)

The Court of Auditors shall carry out the Union's audit.

It shall consist of one national of each Member State. Its Members shall be completely independent in the performance of their duties, in the Union's general interest.

---