alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS FOR CONTINUING  OPERATIONS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND
1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND 1998  (UNAUDITED) FOR CONTINUING  OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.  </LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           300,059
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            3,532
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 303,591
<CASH>                                           8,532
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 502,288
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             18,004
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 108,630
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 55,834
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,573
<OTHER-SE>                                     259,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   502,288
<PREMIUMS>                                     686,075
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             17,971
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  16,557
<BENEFITS>                                     522,123
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           178,567
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,553
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,973
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,580
<DISCONTINUED>                                  10,003
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0

        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 15



Gothic Energy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Letter Regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Re:   Gothic Energy Corporation and Subsidiaries
      Registration on Form S-3

We are aware that our report dated May 13, 1997 on our review of the interim
financial information of Gothic Energy Corporation for the period ended 
March 31, 1997 and included in this Form 10-QSB is incorporated by reference in
the Company's registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 0-19753). Pursuant to
Rule 436 (c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be
considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by us
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.





COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.

Tulsa, Oklahoma
May 13, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         161,093
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,604
<INVENTORY>                                    211,413
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               528,279
<PP&E>                                       1,016,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                 774,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 770,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,122
<BONDS>                                        185,305
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,361,440
<COMMON>                                       969,834
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,839,703)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   770,998
<SALES>                                      2,113,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,120,364
<CGS>                                        1,696,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,137,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,311
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,077
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,764)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,262)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,502)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
April 16, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JASON B. JACKSON, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00150-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
H. R. 1424 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

permits the display of Fallen Soldier Displays in national cemeteries. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Warrior Battlefield Cross 

Memorial Act’’. 

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR FALLEN SOLDIER DISPLAYS IN 

NATIONAL CEMETERIES. 

Section 2403 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d)(1) Subject to standards established by the Secretary, the 

Secretary shall permit the display of a Fallen Soldier Display in 

any national cemetery. 

‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘Fallen Soldier Display’ means 

a memorial monument in honor of fallen members of the Armed 

Forces that may include a replica of an inverted rifle, boots, helmets, 

and identification tag.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
PORK LMR WEBINAR SERIES-FALL 2021

Part II: USDA Livestock Mandatory Reports - Live Swine Reports

Tuesday, October 19, 2021, 11:00 am – 12:30 pm Central Time

USDA Market News will introduce you to LMR swine reports and address how data is reviewed and aggregated. CME Group will 

explain how LMR information is used in the CME Lean Hog Index. Representatives from the National Pork Producers Council and 

Iowa State University will explore how to use LMR swine reports as a risk management tool.

Scott Hays is a fifth-generation pork producer and as the CEO of Two Mile Pork, LLC, oversees 

all aspects of production and business operations. Scott currently serves as Vice President on the 

National Pork Producers Council Board of Directors and represents producers on various national 

committees. Scott is a member of the Missouri Pork Association Board, Missouri Corn Growers Association, Missouri Agricultural Leaders of Tomorrow president, Missouri Farm Bureau, Monroe City FFA, and 

Missouri Institute of Cooperatives.

Anne Krema currently serves as Director of Research and Product Development at CME Group. 

She is responsible for maintaining the current livestock and dairy product offering, as well as researching potential new products. Since joining CME Group, Anne has worked closely with commercial 

market participants in the agricultural space to ensure that the Exchange continues to serve as an effective venue for risk management for the hedging community. Anne studied Economics and Statistics 

at the University of Michigan.

Dr. Lee Schulz is an associate professor in the Department of Economics at Iowa State University and serves as the statewide specialist on livestock economics and markets. His areas of expertise 

are in production and marketing, price analysis, and risk management for the cattle and pork industries. Lee routinely collaborates with Farm Management Extension, the Iowa Beef Center and Iowa 

Pork Industry Center, the Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, and industry stakeholders. 

He publishes regularly in professional journals, extension publications, and the popular press and has 

spoken at numerous professional and agricultural conferences.

Kirk Hatfield serves as a Supervisory Market Reporter in the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service’s (AMS) Livestock, Poultry, and Grain Market News office in Des Moines, IA. He oversees LMR live 

swine reporting, as well as several livestock voluntary reports. Kirk has been with LPGMN for nearly 

6 years, previously serving as a Market Reporter working on swine, pork, poultry, and local-regional 

reports. Kirk holds a B.S. in Animal Science from Iowa State University.

REGISTER HERE

September 2021. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
Dear Stakeholder,

This is a newsletter from the Plant Variety Protection Office (PVPO) providing you with 

information and updates on the program. In this issue, we are announcing the recently 

published Plant Variety Protection (PVP) Regulations proposed rule in the U.S. Federal Register 

(FR).

The 2018 Farm Bill, Public Law No: 115-334, Sec. 10108, December 20, 2018, amended the U.S. 

PVP Act to add asexually propagated plants, previously not available under the act. The 

amendment necessitates a revision of the U.S. PVP Regulations. The proposed rule has been 

published in the FR, which informs the public of the amendment and provides the opportunity 

for public comment.

Highlights of the changes you will see in the proposed rule:

1. Addition and adjustment throughout the regulations to reflect the addition of asexually 

reproduced plants.

2. The fee structure was streamlined:

• Fees for the application, examination, and certificate issuance are now required 

to be made at the time of filing the application. Appropriate refunds will be 

made for withdrawals and abandonments.

• Reduced hourly rate from $107 to $97.

3. Germplasm deposit of asexually reproduced material is proposed.

If you are interested in providing comments, please go to https://www.federalregister.gov/ and 

search for FR Notice: AMS-ST-19-0004. Comments can be submitted from this website.

Thank you for your interest in the PVPO. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, 

and lender. For more information, please contact:
Plant Variety Protection Office

Science & Technology Program

Agricultural Marketing Service

United States Department of Agriculture

1400 Independence Ave, SW - Room 4512, Mail Stop 0274

Washington, DC 20250

Phone: (202) 260-8983

PVPOmail@ams.usda.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 144 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 144

 To prohibit the flying of any flag other than the United States flag 
    over United States diplomatic and consular posts, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

 Mr. Duncan (for himself, Mr. Norman, Mr. Banks, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. 
    Kelly of Mississippi, Mr. Biggs, Mrs. Lesko, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. 
    Meadows, and Mr. Buck) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the flying of any flag other than the United States flag 
    over United States diplomatic and consular posts, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Old Glory Only Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FLYING OF CERTAIN FLAGS OVER UNITED STATES 
              DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR POSTS.

    The Secretary of State shall ensure that no United States 
diplomatic or consular post flies any flag other than the United States 
flag over such post.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Herbert Carvalho, Appellant.

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered March 23, 1990, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and leaving the scene of an accident, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the indictment charging him with violating Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1192 (2) and (3) violated the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. We disagree. It is clear that subdivisions (2) and (3) of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 were intended to be separate crimes, neither mutually inclusive nor mutually exclusive. To suggest that the People should be compelled to elect between the two counts at any stage of the criminal proceedings would *688run counter to the intention of the Legislature which has determined that the social evil in question—driving while intoxicated—warrants separate offenses *(see, People v Rudd,*41 AD2d 875).

There is also no merit to the defendant’s claim that the verdict returned by the jury was repugnant in that it acquitted him of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2) while finding him guilty of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3). The jury could have reasonably concluded that the breathalyzer results were not reliable and that the alcohol content level of his blood did not reach the statutory level, but that, based on testimonial evidence as to his appearance, demeanor, and ability to perform tests of motor coordination, the defendant was operating a motor vehicle while he was intoxicated *(see, e.g., People v Farmer,*36 NY2d 386, 393; *see also, People v Whelan,*165 AD2d 313).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]), or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lloyd Morgan, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted, following a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and two counts of criminal possession of a con*1035trolled substance in the seventh degree. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to question the undercover officer about a hearsay document which improperly bolstered that witness’s identification of defendant. Although the police report made by another officer would have been admissible as a business record had the People laid a proper foundation *(see,*CPLR 4518 [a]; *People ex rel. McGee v Walters,*62 NY2d 317, 320-321), where, as here, the People failed to do so, the trial court erred in admitting such report in evidence *(see, Matter of Leon RR,*48 NY2d 117, 122; *Sabatino v Turf House,*76 AD2d 945, 946). However, since the evidence of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming, we conclude that the error was harmless *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230).

The undercover officer positively identified defendant as the person who sold him cocaine on two separate occasions at defendant’s apartment where defendant was arrested approximately one week following the second sale. The officer explained that he did not note defendant’s facial scar as part of the description of defendant on his narcotic incident reports because he knew the defendant. Tape recordings of the two transactions also supported the officer’s testimony. Thus, the erroneous admission of testimony relating to the information contained on the prisoner data report does not require reversal of defendant’s conviction.

We find no merit to defendant’s additional argument that his sentence was harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1371 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1371

 To conduct or support further comprehensive research for the creation 
                   of a universal influenza vaccine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2019

Ms. DeLauro (for herself, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. Cohen, Ms. Jackson 
 Lee, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, and Ms. Norton) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To conduct or support further comprehensive research for the creation 
                   of a universal influenza vaccine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flu Vaccine Act''.

SEC. 2. RESEARCH FOR THE CREATION OF A UNIVERSAL INFLUENZA VACCINE.

    (a) In General.--The Director of the National Institute of Allergy 
and Infectious Diseases shall conduct or support comprehensive research 
for the creation of a universal influenza vaccine.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--To carry out this section, 
there are authorized to be appropriated $200,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2020 through 2024.
                                 <all>
```
Overview of Livestock Reports: 

USDA NASS Hogs and Pigs

Travis Averill, Branch Chief

USDA NASS
Hogs and Pigs: Overview

• Sample/Data Collection

• Weighting and Summarization

• Administrative Data

• Revisions

• Balance Sheet

• Trade Expectations

• Census of Agriculture

• Quick Stats
Hogs and Pigs: Program States

Monthly Survey/Monthly Estimates Published

Only Annual Estimates Published

Estimating – Non-Published State
Hogs and Pigs: Sample 
Hogs and Pigs: Data Collection Methods

• Mail

• Internet

• Personal interview

• Telephone
Hogs and Pigs: Questionnaire
Hogs and Pigs: Survey Weighting & Summarization

• Weighting

• Summary

• Estimation
Hogs and Pigs: Administrative Data

• In addition to survey data, NASS 

also makes use of administrative 

data from the following sources:

• USDA 

• AMS, FAS, and FSIS

• State Departments of Agriculture

Canadian Imports by Quarter
Hogs and Pigs: Revisions September 2021

Survey Item

Initial

Estimate

(1,000 head)

Current

Revision

(1,000 head)

Net Revision

(1,000 head)

Current 

Estimate

(1,000 head)

December 1, 2020 All Hogs and Pigs 77,502 -190 -680 76,822

Pig Crop 34,973 -99 -359 34,614

March 1, 2021 All Hogs and Pigs 74,773 -1,090 -950 73,823

Pig Crop 33,270 -1,292 -1,292 31,978

June 1, 2021 All Hogs and Pigs 75,653 -1,250 -1,250 74,403

Pig Crop 33,584 0 0 33,584
Hogs and Pigs: Balance Sheet

Supply:

Beginning Inventory +

Pig crop +

Imports +

Total Supply

Disposition:

Commercial slaughter -

Farm slaughter –

Deaths -

Exports

Total Disposition 

Estimated Inventory -

Indicated Inventory =

Residual
Hogs and Pigs: Quarterly Report

• Inventory data:

• Breeding herd

• Market hogs

• Weight groups

• Farrowing

• Current quarter

• Intentions for next 3 months and 6 months

• Pig Crop

• Monthly and Quarterly

• Pigs per litter
Hogs and Pigs: Trade Expectations
Census of Agriculture
www.quickstats.nass.usda.gov
Questions

• Please contact Travis Averill (202) 692-0069 or Travis.Averill@usda.gov
[4910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT ATION

Federal Aviation Administration

(DOT).

14 CFR Part 39

.=,

IV· I+td~Vl

IT

1- 2.5-10

(Docket No. FAA-1009-1107; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-t38-AD; Amendmcn ~S"'MIIOI.

~ )'oW - 04 08' -Ai.~.I'40d~weYlf-dowfJ -7

39-*****; AD 2010-**_H] "'-=I(i

110202. Z-OIO-()Lj-{)9 C.

RIN 2120-AA64 m

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200 Series Airplanes and Model

A340-200 and -300 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products liste

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

*

* * * * * * lATE

[European Aviation Safety Agency (EASi\)] AD 2006-0191 [which

corresponds to FAA AD 2006-21-08] required the installation of new heat

shield panels with drainage over the air conditioning packs in order to

avoid an undetected fire in this zone following a fuel leak from the centre

larue

Olin"" S"'MJIOl

~ITIAl..','sIG

"TIIAl.SISKJ
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF APRIL 14, 2015

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD76842 Robert A. Williams vs. State of Missouri

WD77977 In the Interest of: S.J.F. and A.J.F., Jr.; Juvenile Officer vs. A.J.F. (Natural Father)

WD77978 Consolidated with WD77977

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD76926 State of Missouri vs. Chervaldric A. Williams

WD76945 State of Missouri vs. Ronald Wayne Greer, Jr.

WD76977 State of Missouri vs. Kenneth W. Shumate