alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12012M041 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M041

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE V: GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION AND SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Chapter 2: Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy - Section 1: Common provisions - Article 41 (ex Article 28 TEU) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0037 - 0038 *

Article 41

(ex Article 28 TEU)

1. Administrative expenditure to which the implementation of this Chapter gives rise for the institutions shall be charged to the Union budget.

2. Operating expenditure to which the implementation of this Chapter gives rise shall also be charged to the Union budget, except for such expenditure arising from operations having military or defence implications and cases where the Council acting unanimously decides otherwise.

In cases where expenditure is not charged to the Union budget, it shall be charged to the Member States in accordance with the gross national product scale, unless the Council acting unanimously decides otherwise. As for expenditure arising from operations having military or defence implications, Member States whose representatives in the Council have made a formal declaration under Article 31(1), second subparagraph, shall not be obliged to contribute to the financing thereof.

3. The Council shall adopt a decision establishing the specific procedures for guaranteeing rapid access to appropriations in the Union budget for urgent financing of initiatives in the framework of the common foreign and security policy, and in particular for preparatory activities for the tasks referred to in Article 42(1) and Article 43. It shall act after consulting the European Parliament.

Preparatory activities for the tasks referred to in Article 42(1) and Article 43 which are not charged to the Union budget shall be financed by a start-up fund made up of Member States' contributions.

The Council shall adopt by a qualified majority, on a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, decisions establishing:

(a) the procedures for setting up and financing the start-up fund, in particular the amounts allocated to the fund;

(b) the procedures for administering the start-up fund;

(c) the financial control procedures.

When the task planned in accordance with Article 42(1) and Article 43 cannot be charged to the Union budget, the Council shall authorise the High Representative to use the fund. The High Representative shall report to the Council on the implementation of this remit.

--------------------------------------------------
Plant Variety Protection - 25 Certificates Issued on March 14, 2023

APPLICATION 

NUMBER

VARIETY NAME CROP APPLICANT / OWNER *CERTIFIED 

SEED ONLY?

202100390 F8216Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100391 A8083Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100392 R4865Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100393 A8998Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100394 R2945Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100395 T1874Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100396 F0418Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100397 T4793Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100398 A6214Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100399 T9243Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100402 T4512Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100403 R9085Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100404 T6551Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100405 R6076Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100406 T0507Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100407 F1497Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100408 R1540Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100409 A3452Z CORN, FIELD Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100421 TA981 CHINA ASTER Casimir Jones SC No

202100424 Pizzazz PEA, FIELD ProGene Plant Research, LLC No

202100425 Sound POTATO C. Meijer BV No

202100426 Rainier Russet POTATO The United States Government as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture, OSU, 

University of Idaho, and WSU

No

202200002 AMBLER PEA Crites Seed, Inc. No

202200084 Kachofugetsu HYDRANGEA Shinsuke Tanaka No

202200085 Kyokujitsushoten HYDRANGEA Shinsuke Tanaka No

* Certified seed - seed which has been determined by an official seed certifying agency to conform to standards of genetic purity and identity as to variety, 

which standards have been approved by the Secretary.

USDA, AMS, Science and Technology, Plant Variety Protection Office (202) 260-8983 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Cagle’s, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theyear ended March 28, 2009 (the “Report”), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chairman,Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ J. Douglas Cagle                             |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| J. Douglas Cagle                                 |   |
| Chairman, Chief  Executive Officer and President |   |
| (Principal Executive  Officer)                   |   |
| Date: June 11, 2009                         |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, U.S.C.

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Barry Yantis, Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer of Chase General Corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 U.S.C. as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2005 (The Report) fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|Date: September 27, 2005                       
|                                               
|/s/    Barry M. Yantis                         
|Barry M. Yantis                                
|Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer,
|President and Treasurer                        



42
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00263-CV

Nicholas C. Daniels and Rowena 

Daniels

v.

Federal Home Loan Mortgage 

Corporation

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 2

of Denton County (CV-2013-00168)

April 16, 2015

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

It is further ordered that Appellants Nicholas C. Daniels and Rowena 

Daniels shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John McCaffrey, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), rendered October 14, 1983, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as abandoned.

The defendant’s assigned counsel has submitted a brief in which he has described his unsuccessful efforts to contact the defendant, who has served his sentence. In light of the foregoing, counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted, and the appeal is dismissed as abandoned. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
# C_2016202EN.01010301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/103 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/103

---

Article 129

(ex Article 107 TEC)

(ex Article 107 TEC)

1.   The ESCB shall be governed by the decision-making bodies of the European Central Bank which shall be the Governing Council and the Executive Board.

2.   The Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB’) is laid down in a Protocol annexed to the Treaties.

3.   Articles 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 17, 18, 19.1, 22, 23, 24, 26, 32.2, 32.3, 32.4, 32.6, 33.1(a) and 36 of the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB may be amended by the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure. They shall act either on a recommendation from the European Central Bank and after consulting the Commission or on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Central Bank.

4.   The Council, either on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and the European Central Bank or on a recommendation from the European Central Bank and after consulting the European Parliament and the Commission, shall adopt the provisions referred to in Articles 4, 5.4, 19.2, 20, 28.1, 29.2, 30.4 and 34.3 of the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB.

---
OPEN

Organic Market

Development Grant

EXPANDING MARKETS FOR U.S. ORGANIC PRODUCTS

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is supporting new and improved markets for domestically produced 

organic products with an investment of up to $75 million for processing capacity expansion, simplified 

equipment-only, and market development and promotion projects to increase the availability and 

consumption of organic agricultural goods.

5 TARGET MARKETS

Organic grains

& livestock feeds

Organic legumes 

& other rotational 

crops

Organic 

ingredients 

currently 

unavailable in 

commercial form

Organic fibers Organic dairy

3 PROJECT TYPES

Market Development 

& Promotion activities 

develop new or existing 

organic markets.

Processing Capacity 

Expansion projects support 

the infrastructure to improve 

organic agriculture production 

and processing capacity.

Simplified 

Equipment-Only

projects fund equipment 

purchases to expand organic 

businesses. 

GOALS

• Reduce industry reliance on imported organic agricultural products.

• Lower cost barriers for businesses transitioning to organic. 

• Eliminate bottlenecks in the certified organic supply-chain.

• Address critical organic industry needs.

• Provide additional market paths.

Agricultural Marketing Service, 2024 / USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
USDA IS INVESTING UP TO

$75 MILLION TO SUPPORT THE U.S. 

ORGANIC INDUSTRY.

27,000+ producers 

& buyers of organic 

products are expected 

to benefit from these 

projects.

Organic product 

awareness to increase by 

31 million

people

70% of 

projects are from 

small businesses.

Non-profit projects: 14% 

Medium/large business projects: 13%

State & Local government projects: 3%

70 Projects

have been awarded in 29 states.

Projects by 

Award Size

37% between $10k-$100k

23% between $1-3 million

Projects 

by Target 

Market

Some projects 

include more than 

one target market.

Grain & 

Livestock 

feed: 28 Legumes

& other 

rotational 

crops: 21

Other

(such as 

specialty 

crops): 23

Dairy: 15

Ingredients

not currently 

available in 

commercial 

form: 10

Fibers: 6

PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS

Simplified Equipment: 

Flushing, MI

Almar Orchards, LLC will 

purchase equipment 

to increase processing 

capacity for organic apples 

and access a new organic 

baby food market.

Market Development & 

Promotion: Lyons, OR

Oregon Organic Coalition will 

target specialty, craft, and 

farm-to-school markets to 

increase consumer demand 

for organic food and expand 

markets.

Processing Capacity 

Expansion: Camilla, GA

Georgia Organic Peanut 

Association, Inc. will 

expand processing capacity 

to produce certified organic 

peanut oil, resulting in a 

new and expanded local 

organic supply chain.

13%

14%

3%
Exhibit 99.7



Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers





The undersigned firm of Independent Petroleum Engineers, of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, knows that it is named as having prepared an evaluation of the interests of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd., dated February 28, 2006, prepared for filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2005, and hereby gives its consent to the use of its name and to the use of the said estimates.









GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.







Calgary, Canada

Keith M. Braaten

March 22, 2006

Keith M. Braaten, P. Eng.

Executive Vice-President
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6899** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MUTTAQIN FATIR ABDULLAH, a/k/a King, a/k/a Clayton Montray Pinckney , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Margaret B. Seymour , District Judge. ( 3:05

- cr - 00014

- MBS

- 1; 3:08

- cv - 70115

- MBS )

Submitted : November 18, 2010 Decided: November 30, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion
. Muttaqin F atir Abdullah, Appellant Pro Se. James Chris Leventis, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublishe d opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Muttaqin Fatir Abdullah seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see M iller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the den ial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Abdullah has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Abdullah’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### Velma CHEATHAM, now Dotson, Individually, and as Executrix under the last Will and Testament of A. B. Cheatham, Deceased, Appellee, v. J. H. BYNUM and Thelma Lois Bynum, Appellants.

No. 50064.

Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1.

Aug. 16, 1977.

Released for Publication by Order of Court of Appeals Sept. 15, 1977.

Jon M. Masters, Paul E. Simmons, Tahle-quah, for appellee.

Ted R. Fisher, Lewis C. Johnson, Tulsa, for appellants.

*650REYNOLDS, Presiding Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff Velma Cheatham in the amount of $9,162.58 in a suit on a note and a chattel mortgage securing its payment. The action was tried to the court in the face of the demand of the defendants J. H. and Thelma Lois Bynum for a jury trial. The refusal to grant the defendants’ demand for a jury trial is the single point of error raised in this appeal.

The fact that the parties’ right to a jury trial in Oklahoma is determined by the character of the action and of the issues framed by the pleadings, is well established. *Matlock v. Wheeler,*306 P.2d 325 (Okl.1956); *Brewer v. Baker,*283 P.2d 203 (Okl.1955). Plaintiff’s petition contains two causes of action. The first cause of action is on a note and prays for a personal money judgment against the defendants, while the second is for foreclosure of the chattel mortgage securing the note. The defendants’ answer admits execution of the note and sets up a defense of failure of consideration to both of plaintiff’s causes of action. The defendants then allege this failure of consideration has caused a loss of future profits and seeks damages therefor.

12 O.S.1971, § 556 provides:

> Issues of law must be tried by the court, unless referred. Issues of fact arising in action for the recovery of money, or of specific real or personál property, shall be tried to a jury, unless a jury is waived, or a reference is ordered, as hereinafter provided.

The record demonstrates the present action is a suit on a note for a personal money judgment and foreclosure of the mortgage securing it, with a counterclaim for damages. A suit to recover a personal money judgment upon a note and to foreclose a mortgage securing it is not an action of equitable cognizance, but one for the recovery of money in which both parties are entitled to a jury trial as a matter of statutory right. *Frame v. State ex rel. Comm’rs of Land Office,*196 Okl. 292, 164 P.2d 865 (1946); *Barrington v. Hembree,*193 Okl. 340, 143 P.2d 614 (1944); *Philbrick*v. *Puritan Corp.,*178 Okl. 489, 63 P.2d 38 (1936); *Collins v. Industrial Sav. Society,*78 Okl. 319,190 P. 670 (1920). The denial of a jury trial where required by statute is a clear violation of statutory right for which a new trial should be ordered. *Word v. Nakdimen,*74 Okl. 229, 178 P. 257 (1918).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL.

BOX and ROMANG, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.16

ADAPTIVE BROADBAND CORPORATION

ADDENDUM TO THE FEBRUARY 18, 2000

RETENTION AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENT


THIS ADDENDUM TO THE FEBRUARY 18, 2000 RETENTION AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENT
("Addendum") is entered into as of July 5, 2000 (the  "Effective Date"), between
ADAPTIVE BROADBAND CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("ADAP") and  George
Arena (the "Employee").

RECITAL

By this Addendum, ADAP authorizes the Employee to accept employment as a
director on the Board of Moseley Associates without such employment limiting the
duration or continuance of severance compensation as outlined in Paragraph 4 of
the Retention and Severance Agreement dated February 18, 2000 ("Agreement").
However, any compensation exceeding $20,000 in one 12 month period shall result
in a dollar-for-dollar reduction in level of severance  compensation described
therein.  Employment as a director on the board of any other business or entity,
whether paid or not, shall not constitute employment and shall not limit the
duration or continuance nor reduce the amount of severance compensation.

The parties agree as follows:

1.  Severance Compensation.  ADAP authorizes The Employee to begin employment as
    ----------------------
a director on the board of any business or entity, including Moseley Associates,
without such employment limiting the duration or continuance of severance
compensation as provided in Section 4 of the Agreement.  However, the amount of
compensation exceeding $20,000 in one 12 month period that the Employee receives
as a director on the Board of Moseley Associates shall be deducted from the
severance compensation amount paid by ADAP.

2.  Miscellaneous.  Except as modified by this Addendum, the Agreement remains
    --------------
in full force and effect


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum as of the day and
year first above written.


ADAPTIVE BROADBAND CORPORATION
<PAGE>

________________________________
________________________________

Donna Birks
George Arena

Executive Vice President and CFO
Employee
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET FOR CONTINUING OPERATIONS AT JUNE 30, 1998
(UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) FOR CONTINUING OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           294,192
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            3,928
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 298,120
<CASH>                                           7,078
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 628,200
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             20,038
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 102,422
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                123,132
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,570
<OTHER-SE>                                     312,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   628,200
<PREMIUMS>                                     461,915
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             11,804
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   9,475
<BENEFITS>                                     353,610
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           116,735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,707
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,764
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,707
<DISCONTINUED>                                   5,714
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,657
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>