alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016202EN.01040401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/404 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/404

---

Article 51

Field of application

1.   The provisions of this Charter are addressed to the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law. They shall therefore respect the rights, observe the principles and promote the application thereof in accordance with their respective powers and respecting the limits of the powers of the Union as conferred on it in the Treaties.

2.   The Charter does not extend the field of application of Union law beyond the powers of the Union or establish any new power or task for the Union, or modify powers and tasks as defined in the Treaties.

---
# C_2016202EN.01007101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/71

---

Article 60

(ex Article 53 TEC)

(ex Article 53 TEC)

The Member States shall endeavour to undertake the liberalisation of services beyond the extent required by the directives issued pursuant to Article 59(1), if their general economic situation and the situation of the economic sector concerned so permit.

To this end, the Commission shall make recommendations to the Member States concerned.

---
STATE OF LOUISIANA 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

CHARLOTTE BETHLY AND NICOLE 

DAVIS, OBO HER MINOR 

CHILDREN, NAKIYA DAVIS AND 

KHLOE DAVIS 

VERSUS 

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY, JB HUNT TRANSPORT, 

INC. AND DARRIS JENNINGS 

NO. 2021 CW 1626 

JANUARY 14, 2022 

In Re: Ace American Insurance Company, J.B. Hunt Transport, 

Inc. and Darris Jennings, applying for supervisory 

writs, 18th Judicial District Court, Parish of 

Iberville, No. 80228. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. This writ is 

denied as to the portion of the trial court's December 1, 2021 

ruling which denied defendants' neuropsychological expert the 

ability to conduct testing on plaintiff. This writ is granted 

for the limited purpose of prohibiting plaintiffs from making 

remarks before the jury or cross-examining defendants' 

neuropsychological expert or any witness as to the fact that 

such expert did not conduct testing on the plaintiff. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

PUTY CLERK OF COURT 

FOR THE COURT 

JMG 

GH 

WRC
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Aventura Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Craig A. Waltzer,
        Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
  August
        14, 2006   By:  /s/
        Craig A. Waltzer
 Craig
        A.
        Waltzer
 Chief
        Executive Officer, President and Director
**Exhibit 15**
Goody’s Family Clothing, Inc.Knoxville, Tennessee
We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the AmericanInstitute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financialinformation of Goody’s Family Clothing, Inc. as of and for the thirteen weeksended May 4, 2002 and May 5, 2001, as indicated in our report dated May 21,2002; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on thatinformation.
We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in yourQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 4, 2002, isincorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-32357, 33-51210,33-68520, 333-00052 and 333-09595 on Form S-8.
We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) underthe Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the RegistrationStatement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared orcertified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPAtlanta, GeorgiaMay 31, 2002
14
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Lubys, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
August 27, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, K. Scott Gray, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  |                          
|----- |  | ------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------
|Date: |  | March 2, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ K. Scott Gray        
|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  | K. Scott Gray            
|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and
|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer  



26
# EUR-Lex - 12012M007 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M007

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE I: COMMON PROVISIONS - Article 7 (ex Article 7 TEU) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0019 - 0020 *

Article 7

(ex Article 7 TEU)

1. On a reasoned proposal by one third of the Member States, by the European Parliament or by the European Commission, the Council, acting by a majority of four fifths of its members after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach by a Member State of the values referred to in Article 2. Before making such a determination, the Council shall hear the Member State in question and may address recommendations to it, acting in accordance with the same procedure.

The Council shall regularly verify that the grounds on which such a determination was made continue to apply.

2. The European Council, acting by unanimity on a proposal by one third of the Member States or by the Commission and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may determine the existence of a serious and persistent breach by a Member State of the values referred to in Article 2, after inviting the Member State in question to submit its observations.

3. Where a determination under paragraph 2 has been made, the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may decide to suspend certain of the rights deriving from the application of the Treaties to the Member State in question, including the voting rights of the representative of the government of that Member State in the Council. In doing so, the Council shall take into account the possible consequences of such a suspension on the rights and obligations of natural and legal persons.

The obligations of the Member State in question under the Treaties shall in any case continue to be binding on that State.

4. The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may decide subsequently to vary or revoke measures taken under paragraph 3 in response to changes in the situation which led to their being imposed.

5. The voting arrangements applying to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council for the purposes of this Article are laid down in Article 354 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

--------------------------------------------------
----

----

----

| 1.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Matthew K. Rose                  |   | /s/ Thomas N. Hund                                   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Matthew K. Rose                      |   | Thomas N. Hund                                       |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

----

----
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                           CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATIONS
                           OF SERIES G PREFERRED STOCK
                                 OF ALTEON INC.

      Pursuant to Section 151 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, Alteon Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Delaware, does hereby certify as follows:

      Pursuant to the authority conferred upon the Board of Directors of the
Corporation by Article Fifth of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation, as amended, the Board of Directors of the Corporation on October 6,
2004 adopted the following resolution increasing the number of shares of Series
G Preferred Stock.

            "RESOLVED, that last sentence of Section 1 of the Certificate of
      Designations for the Corporation's Series G Preferred Stock be amended in
      its entirety to read as follows: "The number of shares constituting the
      Series G Preferred Stock shall be 2,000."

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate of Amendment is made this 6th day of
October 2004.

                                        ALTEON INC.

                                   By: /s/ Kenneth I. Moch
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Kenneth I. Moch
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
^ —i—

oJ TKZne: l/ert* tk/jsA/,///*/zA £&/£ siiST tfJj&J&Ato&f

to #s*j,sm t/tij 73m> £„/& e/? AAfef/jtfeM^zd/m,

oJ^T^^^^^ma/jp/^m^c///^MMAd

ZUUMffiAh Apt'Mffi/ut&r A/ja/ttAAjr SA&DjiJte

Bl MAac/ml /TSitrssdJy Me ^dj/^M/d/^^uh£

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS

APR 17 2015

Ab@SAeosta, Clerk
«.

M jfAtefo&lf WM& &t&4&jdTJbjLAte-&l£

&J ///04alt&S AM/Affi£ njiMXdJtf /£sAfa23£k)J'

(9) JuaY A#A&'.'//*& > Jf * j ,

(<f/JJdM/i MfA/i/tfafojtJ &4Af* i/aAsz*?5^/jz/,

//SJ '/V/.A6f££:/r0JL&< 4fJ&//£l£&*

Ov)Mi Ai£# 4aA9#/A ilsM&MjaiJ,

faiYSZ £&//£*)££-'0A^At&£/)£*&/. tpTUE Jmws. fr CpjCk/J/ui/j,

ty.Mfim Ada m&?7%j$7

•* /JAjZMfom >A£AJ,f£$ £&&£&££&/, Mr
\ • i

fmSfr A

'•&40&0d9 * -• •••••'

•>#&tont&fa M#S 4amS^ £##%� C^^M^dk/t^d

•• fitimm*tA? fiSfc ^te $AAMd§^^£JmM MSty* ^&y^Jm1^m^ S^^j^m£fX tMJPf&M.X'

« . *Vi K-fiftl-,1V.**,' 1;".K*J!<V-;\'

li|ii;n>jiYiiiiMM^iLiii|.|i|(iijljLTlV^jilij.ij;ii

1'U^!^ftjJJ»|iM^K#!iiy|jip!i!j^ijy!g!!«gi.

f

&/$W*

AjtWt MlkJ/mn

•f#-Abt&fA9 *
**i •*, <hw**h> _* „ ^-ev^-* r " •"*" ^^

$J7$£. Umts fctopttstimi&t' AmA'JBf&ucfaAt utAAks?

m m to- JmMM Mtfmm*k&vAm>J0w

fi*frP*&ti&:'m a$/s Cm&, 0) 0AA C$#&£$%#&&*?$&& A*/ CpMtitifAt tCtdtifaS

£)Ml^md>/} C& i/fotf/A* Ma: SfjfjfejAd/Ufczsp,, A#cfAt/i A&dmAf£?pMc£tfs /& AffcA/afc mmm^t/ fiop 5& uf#k&$mA)a/k&CAz<,

*A ' /

tbj 4//AsSkj&ffMSk 0^#a&pj/&&i /maJh&A

MAaa faAfoi&t6\r Ms £wjt£lofc&/&Ad&&'

''. #«/ 5/ :%PA^t Ati^jtm

ilAffjf /$&£%// 04&££/,t ' '

it)

/
'*"F^*v^; *&Tr* c ^t^'&dt^ ^.i'^* -J

/ft

..... kw^^dmmm^^^Am

(in A&mmem&i/m&tis'*

%¥) Akf A#AA// MrA M^mmQ/^md

£)£mmw¥A&smgm^f mmM^iMm M0A^Am ^mtAm\

^ •/

«W^M^^dm/
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1252 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard in Van Nuys, California, as the ‘‘Marilyn Monroe Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1252 EH

1 SECTION 1. MARILYN MONROE POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard in 

4 Van Nuys, California, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Marilyn Monroe Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Marilyn Monroe Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1252 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. in Van Nuys, California, as the ‘‘Marilyn Monroe al Service located at 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 05, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 05, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0415. BROOKS LAVERNE HARTLEY v. JULIE ANN HARTLEY. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 19V0074
LABRANDON BODISON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-6210

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 15, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.

Jonathan E. Sjostrom, Judge.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, and Melissa J. 

Ford, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional 

Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders* appeal, appellant raises a scrivener’s error in his sentence. 

He notes that when the court orally pronounced his sentence in case number 2012-

CF-503, the court stated that sentence was to run concurrently with the sentences 

imposed in case number 2011-CF-622. However, in the written judgment and 

* Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

 
sentence, the court failed to place a check mark on the appropriate line indicating 

that the sentence in case number 2012-CF-503 was to run concurrently. Appellant 

preserved this issue by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal

Procedure 3.800(b). However, the trial court failed to rule on the motion within 60 

days, and thus it was deemed denied. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(1)(B). The 

State was given the opportunity to respond to this Anders appeal pursuant to 

Harrison v. State, 146 So. 3d 76, 80-81 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), and agrees that the

error should be corrected. 

We reverse and remand for the trial court to conform the written sentence to 

the oral pronouncement. See Knight v. State, 114 So. 3d 1067 (Fla. 1st DCA 

2013). Appellant need not be present for the correction of this scrivener’s error. 

Appellant’s judgment and sentence are otherwise affirmed. 

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED with 

instructions. 

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF, and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.

2
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

8.   Declaration on practical measures to be taken upon the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon as regards the Presidency of the European Council and of the Foreign Affairs Council

Declaration on practical measures to be taken upon the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon as regards the Presidency of the European Council and of the Foreign Affairs Council

In the event that the Treaty of Lisbon enters into force later than 1 January 2009, the Conference requests the competent authorities of the Member State holding the six-monthly Presidency of the Council at that time, on the one hand, and the person elected President of the European Council and the person appointed High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, on the other hand, to take the necessary specific measures, in consultation with the following six-monthly Presidency, to allow an efficient handover of the material and organisational aspects of the Presidency of the European Council and of the Foreign Affairs Council.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

R.D., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-937

[December 17, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Stacy M. Ross, Judge; L.T. Case No. 19003065DL.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., MAY and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2016203EN.01003901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/39

---

Article 104

No person or undertaking concluding or renewing an agreement or contract with a third State, an international organisation or a national of a third State after 1 January 1958 or, for acceding States, after the date of their accession, may invoke that agreement or contract in order to evade the obligations imposed by this Treaty.

Each Member State shall take such measures as it considers necessary in order to communicate to the Commission, at the request of the latter, all information relating to agreements or contracts concluded after the dates referred to in the first paragraph, within the scope of this Treaty, by a person or undertaking with a third State, an international organisation or a national of a third State. The Commission may require such communication only for the purpose of verifying that such agreements or contracts do not contain clauses impeding the implementation of this Treaty.

On application by the Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Union shall give a ruling on the compatibility of such agreements or contracts with the provisions of this Treaty.

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Post-Effective Amendment Number 14 to the Guardian Separate Account D
registration statement on Form N-4 (the "Registration Statement") of our report
dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of The Guardian
Separate Account D, and our report dated February 20, 2002, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company,
Inc., which appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Financial and Actuarial Experts" in such
Registration Statement.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


New York, New York
April 26, 2002
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00742-CR

BENNY JOSEPH WALKER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 21st District Court of Washington County. (Tr. Ct. 16,410).

TO THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 3rd day of February 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by 

the trial court on August 20, 2013. After submitting the case 

on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by 

the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment

contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms

the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.
Judgment rendered February 3, 2015.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and 

Huddle. Opinion delivered by Justice Huddle.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

April 17, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6997
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STANLEY A. SLUPKOWSKI, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:93-cr-00219) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 11, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley A. Slupkowski, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Stanley A. Slupkowski seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the government’s motion to dismiss the pending indictment against him. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The district court entered judgment on June 14, 1994. The notice of appeal was filed on May 20, 2008. Because Slupkowski failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED