alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ralston Purina Company, Plaintiff, v Arthur G. McKee & Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, and Industrial First, Inc., Defendant and Second Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant. GAF Corporation et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants and Second Third-Party Defendants-Appellants-Respondents.

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Successive motions for summary judgment should be discouraged in the absence of a showing of newly discovered evidence or other sufficient cause *(see, McDougal v County of Livingston,*89 AD2d 815; *Marine Midland Bank v Fisher,*85 AD2d 905, 906; *Graney Dev. Corp. v Taksen,*62 AD2d 1148, 1149). In this case, third-party defendants GAF and Silbrico instituted two prior motions, one for summary judgment (CPLR 3212) and the other for dismissal (CPLR 3019). Both motions were denied, and the movants have failed to raise any issue that was not, or could not have been, raised on those prior applications. Under the circumstances, the court properly denied the instant motions.

Supreme Court erred, however, in denying the cross motion of defendant and third-party plaintiff Industrial First to dismiss the Statute of Limitations defense raised by both third-party defendants. The third-party complaints seek contribution and implied indemnification, and it is undisputed that no payment has been made by the third-party plaintiff. A cause of action for indemnity or contribution does not accrue for Statute of Limitations purposes until payment has been made by the party seeking to recover *(see, State of New York v Stewart’s Ice Cream Co.,*64 NY2d 83, 88-89; *McDermott v City of New York,*50 NY2d 211, 217-220). Here, the Statute of Limitations on the third-party plaintiff’s claim has not begun to run. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ricotta, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio, and Lowery JJ. (Order entered May 23, 1991.)
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Salvatore DAuria, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tut Systems Inc., on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tut Systems, Inc.





By:

LOGOSalvatore DAuria Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary





Date: October 31, 2002
Test Kit Evaluation Submission Form 

The applicant must fill out the submission form and provide it along with the submission 

packet. The information provided in the submission form will be used in creating the 

certificate if the test kit meets all FGIS requirements; therefore, it is imperative that the 

form be filled out correctly. A fillable version of this form is available on the AMS Website.

Contact Information 

Applicant (i.e., test kit manufacturer)

Street Address

City, State, Zip Code

Contact Person

Phone Number

Email Address

Billing Address 

(if different than manufacturer’s address)

City, State, Zip Code

Test Kit Information 

Test Kit Name

Product Identification Number

Test Method Format

Reader Name

Reader Model or Identification Number

Detection Method

Upper Conformance Limit

Additional Commodities 

(list in alphabetical order)
Test Kit Evaluation Submission Form (continued) 

Design Criteria and Performance Specification Check List

The test kit meets the performance requirements and submission packet 

components are included. 

Initials 

Time for completion of analysis ≤ 30 minutes

FGIS reference method or equivalent used for reference analyses (validation report or 

literature reference provided if FGIS reference method not used)

Accuracy study for naturally contaminated wheat from 5.0 – 100 ppb ochratoxin A

Additional accuracy data for optional extension of upper limit of conformance 

above 100 ppb ochratoxin A in wheat

Data supporting accuracy of multiple ranges of quantitation

Additional commodities – accuracy data; sample preparation and analytical procedure 

is described for each additional commodity (including grinding procedure); type of 

reference material is given (naturally-contaminated or standard-solution fortified)

Use of the test kit does not expose the employees to toxic or hazardous substances 

higher than OSHA Standards per 29 CFR when used without a fume hood or respirator. 

Use of the test kit does not generate radioactive waste, P-listed hazardous waste, or 

hazardous waste listed for its toxicity characteristic as defined in 40 CFR

Safety Data Sheets (SDS)

Reader electromagnetic field study certification statement (renewals exempt if same reader)

Temperature sensitivity study

Shelf life study

Certificates of analysis for reference materials

Written test kit instructions (provided as Microsoft Word document)

Method flow chart is included (optional)

Protocol & Notification Agreement Statement signed by applicant

Comments
10K


Exhibit
23.1














Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








Board
of Directors and Stockholders


The
Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.


Arlington,
Virginia




We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333−87450 and 333−140957) of The Bureau of
National Affairs, Inc.of
our report dated March 25,2009,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule which appears in this Form 10K.




/s/BDO
Seidman, LLP


BDO
Seidman, LLP




Bethesda,
Maryland


March25,
2009








62
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAIXIONG JIN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-74216

Agency No. A098-475-630

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 7, 2014** 

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

On January 21, 2015, the court granted the government’s unopposed motion

to stay proceedings. On March 11, 2015, the government informed the court that

Haixiong Jin, a native and citizen of China, is not a candidate for prosecutorial

FILED

APR 16 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
discretion, and requested that this case move forward. The stay of proceedings is

hereby lifted.

Jin petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §

1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying

the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID

Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the

petition for review.

Even if Jin’s asylum claim was timely, substantial evidence supports the

agency’s adverse credibility determination based on an inconsistency between Jin’s

testimony and his documentary evidence regarding his level of education, and

based on Jin’s inability to explain the visas in his Chinese passport. See id. at 1048

(adverse credibility determination reasonable under the totality of the

circumstances); see also Goel v. Gonzales, 490 F.3d 735, 739 (9th Cir. 2007)

(“inconsistencies between testimonial and documentary evidence [are] a proper

basis for an adverse credibility finding”). We reject Jin’s contention that the IJ

engaged in speculation, and his contention that the IJ did not consider his

2 12-74216
explanations. Further, Jin’s explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. See

Zamanov v. Holder, 649 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2011). In the absence of credible

testimony, Jin’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v.

Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, Jin’s CAT claim fails because it is based on the same testimony the

agency found not credible, and Jin does not point to any other evidence in the

record that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official in China. See

id. at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 12-74216
IB 

Union Calendar No. 60 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1322 

[Report No. 116–85] 

To require a report on the effects of climate change on the Coast Guard, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2019 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York (for himself and Mr. BROWN of 

Maryland) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

MAY 24, 2019 

Additional sponsors: Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. VAN DREW, Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas, 

and Mr. COHEN

MAY 24, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1322 RH

A BILL 

To require a report on the effects of climate change on 

the Coast Guard, and for other purposes. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1322 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON 

4 COAST GUARD. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commandant of 

7 the Coast Guard shall submit to the Committee on Trans8 portation and Infrastructure of the House of Representa9 tives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

10 Transportation of the Senate a report on vulnerabilities 

11 of Coast Guard installations and requirements resulting 

12 from climate change over the next 20 years. 

13 (b) ELEMENTS.—The report under subsection (a) 

14 shall include the following: 

15 (1) A list of the ten most vulnerable Coast 

16 Guard installations based on the effects of climate 

17 change, including rising sea tides, increased flooding, 

18 drought, desertification, wildfires, thawing perma19 frost, or any other categories the Commandant de20 termines necessary. 

21 (2) An overview of mitigations that may be nec22 essary to ensure the continued operational viability 

23 and to increase the resiliency of such vulnerable in24 stallations and the cost of such mitigations. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 1322 RH

1 (3) A discussion of the climate-change-related 

2 effects on the Coast Guard, including the increase in 

3 the frequency of humanitarian assistance and dis4 aster relief missions and the campaign plans, contin5 gency plans, and operational posture of the Coast 

6 Guard. 

7 (4) An overview of mitigations that may be nec8 essary to ensure mission resiliency and the cost of 

9 such mitigations. 

10 (c) FORM.—The report required under subsection (a) 

11 shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain 

12 a classified annex. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 60 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1322 

[Report No. 116–85] 

A BILL 

To require a report on the effects of climate change 

on the Coast Guard, and for other purposes. 

MAY 24, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE IV

FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL

FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL

CHAPTER 3

SERVICES

Article 60

(ex Article 53 TEC)

(ex Article 53 TEC)

The Member States shall endeavour to undertake the liberalisation of services beyond the extent required by the directives issued pursuant to Article 59(1), if their general economic situation and the situation of the economic sector concerned so permit.

To this end, the Commission shall make recommendations to the Member States concerned.

---
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Capital Southwest Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |

|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |  |  |
|                     |   |   |
| Date:  December 20, 2019 | By: | /s/ Bowen S. Diehl |
|                     |   | Bowen S. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer |
cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge 

Renard Truman Polk 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A e
# Genesis Law **n and Landscaping LLC PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST**  **ENVIRONMENTA L:** 

□ Check for people, animals, property in the flight vicinity. □ Notify any bystanders or nearby property owner of your intentions. □ If flying in controlled airspace, notify airspace authority of your intentions. □ First Aid / Safety Kit on hand, stocked, readily accessible, and visible to anyone in the area 

# HA**RDW AR**  **E / EQUIPMENT:**   VISUA** **LLY INSPECT THE A IRFRA** **ME** ******

□ Cracks (espe cially in high stress areas like joints) □ Loose or damaged screws / fasteners / bands / straps / ties □ Loose or damaged wiring □ Loose or damaged connections (solder, plugs, etc) □ Inspect prop mounts & screws & apply slight counter pressure on arms to check for loosened construction □ Battery/batteries fully charged, properly seated & secured □ Remove props and test fail - safe behavior (if applicable) □ Props are smooth and free of damage/defect (check blade, surface, & hub) □ Tighten prop adapters (careful not to over tighten which may damage prop) □ Ensure voltage alarm is connected □ Ensure arming/idle timeout is properly configured (6 - 15 seconds is generally acceptable) □ Check whether the right model is selected in the transmitter (if applicable) □ Check your RC transmitter shows the right range and centering for all sticks □ If desired, perform range test 

# PRE **- FLIGHT:**  **** POWER UP  

□ Batteries charged & secured □ Position quad in a level, safe location for takeoff □ If using onboard video recorder, turn on camera □ All transmitter controls move freely in all directions □ All transmitter trims in its neutral position □ All transmitter switches in correct positio n (typically away) □ Transmitter throttle to zero □ Radio transmitter on □ Connect/power on battery to airframe □ Ensure led indicators & audible tones are all correct (e.g., GPS and Compass are properly calibrated) □ Timer on (if applicable) □ Scan for nearby people or animals □ Stand clear - audibly, loudly announce the word "CLEAR!" □ Arm flight controller 

## ** PRE TA**KEOFF ****

□ Increase throttle slightly listening for any abnormalities □ Short 20 - 30 second hover at 3 - 5 feet (listen for an y weird vibrations or anything that sounds loose)
TERRY DIXON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0177

Opinion filed April 15, 2015.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Terry Dixon, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the judgment and sentence rendered on 

July 15, 2014, in Duval County Circuit Court case number 2013-CF-003881-AXXXMA, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to 

the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. If petitioner qualifies 

for the appointment of counsel at public expense, the lower tribunal is directed to 

appoint counsel to represent him in the belated appeal authorized by this opinion.

WOLF, BENTON, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
4. C. Table of Contents. 
RULEMAKING FILE 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF PROPOSED 

AMENDMENTS TO THE CALIFORNIA CONSUMER PRODUCTS 

REGULATION 

 

1. Updated Informative Digest 

2. Executive Order R-08-016 

3. Resolution 08-30 

4. Final Statement of Reasons 

5. Notice of Decision and Response to Significant 

Environmental Issues 

 6. Economic and Fiscal Impact Statement 

 7. Certificate of Mailing 

 8. Staff Report, Initial Statement of Reasons 

 9. Transcript of Public Hearing 

 10. Slide Presentation 

 11. Written Comments Received During 45-Day 

 Comment Period 

 12. Certificate of Mailing 

 13. Written Comments Received During 15-Day 

 Comment Period 

 14. References Used by ARB Staff
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Harpreet Singh Sangha, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (Amendment No. 2) of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  November 2, 2006 | /s/ Harpreet Singh Sangha
Harpreet Singh Sangha
Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------