alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, the Consolidated Statement of Operations and the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             SEPT. 30, 1998
<PERIOD-END>                  SEPT. 30, 1998
<CASH>                          2,853,281
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                  33,180,432
<ALLOWANCES>                    1,369,815
<INVENTORY>                    37,445,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               73,739,781
<PP&E>                         37,244,354
<DEPRECIATION>                 20,975,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 92,629,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          44,159,455
<BONDS>                       0
<COMMON>                        3,654,558
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0


<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                     19,400,680
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   92,629,887
<SALES>                       124,721,758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              124,721,758
<CGS>                          76,296,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  76,296,877
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               38,349,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              4,671,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 5,403,368
<INCOME-TAX>                    1,562,069
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             3,136,359
<DISCONTINUED>                0
        


</TABLE>
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-88 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 8, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 1 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Double J Angus Beef Program

G-88 Specification

1 REQUIREMENTS

Beef carcasses certified under this specification shall meet the following requirements:

a. Phenotypic or genotypic requirements of the American Angus Association’s (AAA) Live 

Animal Specification;

b. Classed as Steer or Heifer carcasses only1;

c. U.S. Prime, Choice, or Select and have a minimum marbling score of Slight 01;

d. Less than 30 months of age with lean color, texture, and firmness, meeting the requirements for 

A maturity in the U.S. grade it qualifies for1;

e. Medium or fine marbling texture1,2;

f. Moderately thick or thicker muscling and tend to be at least moderately wide and thick in 

relation to their length3

;

g. No hump exceeding 2 inches in height4;

h. Practically free (not detracting from visual quality) of capillary rupture in the ribeye muscle; 

and

i. Free of “dark cutting” characteristics.

2 CERTIFICATION

Carcasses to be examined for compliance with this specification shall be clearly identified and 

presented to an AMS grader for certification. Certification procedures for identification, the removal 

of preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, and 

control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment Division 

(QAD) procedures.

3 LABELING

Labeling of products derived from certified carcasses must follow Food Safety and Inspection Service 

regulations and policy guidelines and QAD procedures.

 1 Determined in accordance with the “Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.” 2 Evaluated using the USDA-AMS-LS-SB-02 Marbling Texture card (included in the Official USDA Marbling Photographs.) 3 Muscle thickness is evaluated by averaging the thickness of the various parts, considering not only the proportion of each part of the 

carcass but also the general value of each part. Superior muscle thickness implies a high proportion of meat to bone and a high 

proportion of the weight of the carcass in the more valuable parts.

4 Measured from a line formed by the extension of the top line (including the fat) and measuring the lean muscle (excluding the fat) 

perpendicular to that line in the center of the hump.
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-88 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 8, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 2 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

4 FEES

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by an AMS grader involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the person, 

group, or plant requesting the service.

___________________________________

Chad Nelson, National Meat Supervisor

Quality Assessment Division

Livestock & Poultry Program
**
**Exhibit 32.3**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Crane Company (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Max H. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant. 

This Certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form10-K and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 
By /s/ Max H. MitchellMax H. MitchellChief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2023**
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XVII

INDUSTRY

INDUSTRY

Article 173

(ex Article 157 TEC)

(ex Article 157 TEC)

1.   The Union and the Member States shall ensure that the conditions necessary for the competitiveness of the Union's industry exist.

For that purpose, in accordance with a system of open and competitive markets, their action shall be aimed at:

| — | speeding up the adjustment of industry to structural changes, |
| --- | --- |

—

speeding up the adjustment of industry to structural changes,

| — | encouraging an environment favourable to initiative and to the development of undertakings throughout the Union, particularly small and medium-sized undertakings, |
| --- | --- |

—

encouraging an environment favourable to initiative and to the development of undertakings throughout the Union, particularly small and medium-sized undertakings,

| — | encouraging an environment favourable to cooperation between undertakings, |
| --- | --- |

—

encouraging an environment favourable to cooperation between undertakings,

| — | fostering better exploitation of the industrial potential of policies of innovation, research and technological development. |
| --- | --- |

—

fostering better exploitation of the industrial potential of policies of innovation, research and technological development.

2.   The Member States shall consult each other in liaison with the Commission and, where necessary, shall coordinate their action. The Commission may take any useful initiative to promote such coordination, in particular initiatives aiming at the establishment of guidelines and indicators, the organisation of exchange of best practice, and the preparation of the necessary elements for periodic monitoring and evaluation. The European Parliament shall be kept fully informed.

3.   The Union shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives set out in paragraph 1 through the policies and activities it pursues under other provisions of the Treaties. The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, may decide on specific measures in support of action taken in the Member States to achieve the objectives set out in paragraph 1, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.

This Title shall not provide a basis for the introduction by the Union of any measure which could lead to a distortion of competition or contains tax provisions or provisions relating to the rights and interests of employed persons.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains restated summary financial information extracted from
the balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained earnings and
statement of cash flows contained in Form 10-K of Canal Electric Company for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000016906
<NAME> CANAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          291,611
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          3,372
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              23,885
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            30,592
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     349,460
<COMMON>                            38,080
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>            8,321
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 52,070
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      98,471
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                83,941
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  29,290
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>            3,230
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>          920
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>         12,547
<LEASES-CURRENT>                       581
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     120,480
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      349,460
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          145,985
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                   609
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         122,721
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         123,330
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             22,655
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                   1,230
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      23,885
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             9,753
<NET-INCOME>                        14,132
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>       14,132
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            13,709
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            8,229
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              36,157
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0



</TABLE>
International Commodity Procurement Division Purchases

FY2019 - Quarter 2

Commodity Qty in MT PO Value Average Cost

BEANS, BLACK BAG-50 KG 320 $258,753.10 $808.60

BEANS, KIDNEY, DARK RED BAG-50 KG 60 $65,752.80 $1,095.88

BEANS, PINTO BAG-50 KG 2,650 $1,756,875.20 $662.97

CORN, YELLOW BAG-50 KG 210 $59,850.00 $285.00

CORNMEAL BAG-HP-25 KG 10,940 $4,581,584.60 $418.79

CORNMEAL, SOY-FORT BAG-HP-25 KG 130 $73,689.20 $566.84

CORN-SOY BLEND PLUS BAG-HP-25 KG 10,280 $7,235,379.50 $703.83

FLOUR, ALL PURPOSE BAG-50 KG 690 $317,851.00 $460.65

LENTILS BAG-50 KG 220 $89,366.20 $406.21

OIL, SUNFLOWERSEED CAN-6/4 L 70 $128,041.13 $1,828.77

OIL, VEGETABLE BOTTLE, PLS-6/4 L 670-719 320 $335,227.88 $1,047.50

OIL, VEGETABLE CAN-6/4 L 6,690 $7,880,075.40 $1,177.84

OIL, VEGETABLE PAIL-20 L 110 $152,450.72 $1,385.80

PEAS, GREEN, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 150 $76,430.00 $509.53

PEAS, YELLOW, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 13,590 $5,886,148.20 $433.12

PEAS, YELLOW, WHOLE BAG-50 KG 400 $143,281.90 $358.20

RICE, 2/7 LG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 240 $105,468.00 $439.45

RICE, 2/7 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 80 $38,042.40 $475.53

RICE, 3/15 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 1,520 $663,829.60 $436.73

RICE, 3/15 MG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 130 $79,544.40 $611.88

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 4,060 $1,977,402.30 $487.04

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 5,220 $2,394,889.20 $458.79

RICE, MILLED BULK 25,320 $11,621,880.00 $459.00

SORGHUM BAG-50 KG 2,040 $468,370.80 $229.59

SORGHUM BULK 12,230 $2,296,304.80 $187.76

WHEAT, SOFT WHITE BAG-50 KG 1,230 $429,885.00 $349.50

WHEAT, SOFT WHITE BULK 124,700 $29,143,224.00 $233.71

Grand Total 223,600 $78,259,597.33 

Commodity Qty in EA PO Value Average Cost

BAGS, WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE- 50 KG 3,730,000 $1,333,797.98 $0.3576
[No. 37742.

Department One.

April 15, 1965.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent, v.*Charles W. “Moon” Mullin, *Appellant.****

*Wettrick, Toulouse, Lirhus & Hove*and *Arnold J. Barer,*for appellant.

*Joseph Panattoni*and *David H. Gorrie,*for respondent.

*

Reported in 400 P.2d 770.

Per Curiam.

The defendant (appellant), Charles W. “Moon” Mullin, was charged with the crime of grand larceny by check on two counts. At his arraignment, without benefit of counsel, he entered a plea of guilty to both counts. Thereafter, prior to his sentencing, he obtained counsel and moved to change his plea from guilty to not guilty. The motion was denied. The trial court entered a judgment of guilty upon the defendant’s plea and sentenced him to the state penitentiary for 15 years on each count, with the sentences to run concurrently. The defendant appeals.

The defendant contends that the court erred in failing to grant his motion for change of plea from guilty to not guilty, and that he was thereby denied his constitutional right to trial by jury.

The defendant argues that he did not intelligently and understanding^ enter his plea to the crime charged.

*66The record discloses that the trial court patiently and exhaustively advised the defendant as to his constitutional rights prior to the entry of his guilty plea; however, immediately after entering his plea, in colloquy between the court and the defendant, the defendant made statements indicating a protestation of innocence and a misunderstanding of the nature of the charges against him.

In *State v. Stacy,*43 Wn.2d 358, 363, 261 P.2d 400 (1953), we said:

> [Wjhenever a defendant attempts to make a plea which by its very wording couples a protestation of innocence with an assertion of guilt, the trial court should refuse to accept the plea until the equivocation therein has been eliminated; and, if the defendant persists in attempting to . enter such a plea, the trial court should require the defendant to stand trial on the offense charged.

> Such a rule is consistent with the orderly and proper administration of justice in criminal cases. It clearly protects the defendant’s right to an opportunity to establish his innocence in a trial before a jury.

We believe the rule as stated in *Stacy*applies here; that the defendant’s plea was equivocal, and that the trial court should have granted the defendant’s motion to change his plea from guilty to not guilty, and required him to stand trial on the offenses charged. In failing to do so, the defendant was denied due process of law in violation of art. 1 § 3 of the Washington State Constitution, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal constitution.

The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

March 30, 2015

Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

P.O. Box 12308

Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

Re: Robert Lynn Pruett

v. Texas

No. 14-8097

(Your No. AP-77,037)

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202)479-3011

Dear Clerk:

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

4.3fr

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 02 2015

AbelAcosta,Clerk
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 17, 2015

NO. 03-14-00679-CR

Ex parte Leslie Parker Jones

APPEAL FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the order entered by the trial court. Leslie Parker Jones has filed a motion 

to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the Court grants the motion, allows Leslie Parker Jones to 

withdraw his notice of appeal, and dismisses the appeal. The appellant shall pay all costs 

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
# C_2012326EN.01020101.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

PROTOCOL (No 32)

ON THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY IN DENMARK

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to settle certain particular problems relating to Denmark,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Notwithstanding the provisions of the Treaties, Denmark may maintain the existing legislation on the acquisition of second homes.

---
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00205]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 10, 2013.

PLACE:  Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS:  Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Board Briefing on the Interagency Final Rule, ``Higher-Priced 
Mortgage'' Loans.
    2. NCUA Annual Performance Plan 2013.
    3. Final Rule--Parts 702, 741 and 791 of NCUA's Rules and 
Regulations and Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement 13-1, 
Regulatory Relief for Small Credit Unions.
    4. Final Rule--Section 701.34 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Low-
Income Designation, Acceptance Deadline.
    5. Final Rule--Section 701.37 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, 
Technical Amendments--Treasury Tax and Loan Depositaries; Depositaries 
and Financial Agents of the Government.
    6. Final Rule--Section 701.14 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, 
``Troubled Condition'' Definition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304

Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-00205 Filed 1-4-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE III

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

Article 30

1.   For the first year after accession, the Union shall provide temporary financial assistance (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Transition Facility’) to Croatia to develop and strengthen its administrative and judicial capacity to implement and enforce Union law and to foster the exchange of best practice among peers. That assistance shall fund institution-building projects and limited small-scale investments ancillary thereto.

2.   Assistance shall address the continued need for strengthening institutional capacity in certain areas through action which cannot be financed by the Structural Funds or by the Rural Development funds.

3.   For twinning projects between public administrations for the purpose of institution building, the procedure for call for proposals through the network of contact points in the Member States shall continue to apply.

4.   The commitment appropriations for the Transition Facility, at current prices, for Croatia shall be EUR 29 million in total in 2013 to address national and horizontal priorities.

5.   Assistance under the Transition Facility shall be decided and implemented in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 or on the basis of other technical provisions necessary for the operation of the Transition Facility, to be adopted by the Commission.

6.   Particular attention shall be paid to ensuring appropriate complementarity with the envisaged European Social Fund support for administrative reform and institutional capacity.

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15I0159. LLOYD CLIFFORD SMITH v. THE STATE.

Houston County State CourtJudge Susan E. McNally entered an order denying

Lloyd Clifford Smith’s motion in limine and motion to suppress. Smith obtained a

certificate of immediate review signed by a different judge and filed this application

for interlocutory appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a partymay apply for interlocutory appellate review

“[w]here the trial judge in rendering an order, decision, or judgment, not otherwise

subject to direct appeal . . . certifies within ten days of entry thereof that the order,

decision, or judgment is of such importance to the case that immediate review should

be had.” (Emphasis supplied.) The plain language of the statute requires that the

same judge who enters the order in question must certify it for immediate review.1

1 This Court has recognized a limited exception to this rule where evidence

shows that the trial judge was unavailable to execute the certificate. See Freemon v.

Dubroca, 177 Ga. App. 745 (1) (341 SE2d 276) (1986); Tingle v. Harvill, 125 Ga.

App. 312, 317-318 (2) (187 SE2d 536) (1972); see also Thorpe v. Russell, 274 Ga.

781, 781-782 (559 SE2d 432) (2002). Smith, however, has made no showing that

Judge McNally was unavailable.

April 10, 2015
See Mauer v. Parker Fibernet, LLC, 306 Ga. App. 160, 162 (701 SE2d 599) (2010).

Because the certificate of immediate review submitted by Smith is invalid, it

does not confer jurisdiction upon this Court. Accordingly, the application for

interlocutory appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/10/2015