alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

BLADIMIR PEREZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-50277

D.C. No. 3:13-cr-04331-BEN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2015**

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Bladimir Perez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 

87-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of 

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 15 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-50277

Perez challenges the district court’s denial of a minor-role reduction under 

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, claiming that the district court incorrectly interpreted and 

applied the Guideline in denying the reduction. We review the district court’s 

interpretation of the Guidelines de novo and its finding that a defendant is not a 

minor participant for clear error. See United States v. Hurtado, 760 F.3d 1065, 

1068 (9th Cir. 2014). Contrary to Perez’s contention, the record reflects that the 

district court properly considered the totality of the circumstances and Perez’s 

culpability relative to that of the average participant. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. 

n.3(A) & (C); Hurtado, 760 F.3d at 1068-69. Moreover, because Perez was the 

registered owner and sole occupant of a vehicle in which a substantial amount of 

drugs were discovered, and he admitted to previously crossing the border with 

drugs, the district court did not clearly err in holding that he was not a minor 

participant. See United States v. Rodriguez-Castro, 641 F.3d 1189, 1193 (9th Cir. 

2011). 

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Charriez, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Haft, J.), rendered February 21, 1990, convicting defendant after a jury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him as a second felony offender to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

This prosecution arose out of a "buy and bust” operation in *381which an undercover officer purchased two glassine bags of heroin, with a specific logo, from co-defendant for $20 in buy bills. The undercover officer contacted the backup unit, and the arresting officer, moments later, saw the co-defendant hand money to defendant. At that moment, focusing on the co-defendant, the arresting officer directed the parties not to move. When defendant saw the officer, he dropped two glassine bags from his hand. Ten more glassine bags of heroin, the $20 in buy money, and a bag of cocaine were recovered from defendant himself.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, and giving due deference to the jury’s findings of credibility *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932) defendant’s guilt was proved beyond a reasonable doubt by overwhelming evidence under the standards set forth in *People v Bleakley*(69 NY2d 490, 495). The circumstances of this case, including the quantity of drugs recovered from defendant, the proximity in time and place between the original sale, the apprehension of the co-defendant, and the arresting officer’s observations, supported the inference that defendant possessed the contraband with intent to sell *(People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233).

The contraband abandoned by defendant was properly seized *(Horton v California,*496 US 128, 110 S Ct 2301). In any event, this evidence would have supported stopping defendant when co-defendant was detained *(see, People v Leung,*68 NY2d 734). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be meritless. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
Exhibit 23






Exhibit 23.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT










As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report on the company, Cyber Law Reporter, Inc. dated January 25, 2002 and all reference to our Firm included in or made part of this registration statement.







HARPER & PEARSON COMPANY







__//s// Joseph Richardson___________




Houston, Texas

April
26, 2002













#
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0027 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM127AD

777 - 78A0065, R1 --- 1/29/09 777 - 78A0065 --- 6/23/08 777 - 78 - 0071, R1 --- 9/8/10 777 - 78 - 0071 --- 11/25/09 777 - 78 - 0082 --- 11/9/11 777 MPD SECTION 9, D622W0 01 - 9 -- OCTOBER 2014

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00428-CR

Charleston Lamon Moody

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 213th District Court

of Tarrant Coun ty (1435751D)

July 20, 2017

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for American Mortgage Acceptance Company and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000878774
<NAME> AMERICAN MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       8,878,874
<SECURITIES>                                40,838,241
<RECEIVABLES>                               62,376,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             112,314,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       56,030,912
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,283,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               112,314,054
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,108,797
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               345,871
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             909,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                483,216
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   483,216
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
P&SP-4100-i Page 1 of 1

Instructions to Complete 

Weigher’s Acknowledgement and Agreement 

for Weighing Live Poultry or Feed 

Form P&SP-4100 

Mail the completed form to the appropriate regional office of the Packers and Stockyards Program as listed 

below. The states covered by each regional office are listed below its address. 

Regional Offices of the Packers and Stockyards Program 

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration

Eastern Regional Office 

Suite 230 

75 Spring Street 

Atlanta, GA 30303-3308 

Telephone: (404) 562-5840 

FAX: (404) 562-5848 

e-mail: 

PSPAtlantaGA.GIPSA@usda.gov

Western Regional Office 

3950 Lewiston St., Suite 200 

Aurora, CO 80011-1556 

Telephone: (303) 375-4240 

FAX: (303) 371-4609 

e-mail: 

PSPDenverCO.GIPSA@usda.gov

Midwestern Regional Office 

Room 317 

210 Walnut Street 

Des Moines, IA 50309-2110 

Telephone: (515) 323-2579 

FAX: (515) 323-2590 

e-mail: 

PSPDesMoinesIA.GIPSA@usda.gov

States Covered States Covered States Covered 

AL, AR, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, LA, 

MA, MD, ME, MS, NC, NH, NJ, 

NY, PA, RI, SC, TN, VA, VT, WV

AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, KS, MT, 

NM, NV, OK, OR, TX, UT, WA, 

WY

IA, IL, IN, KY, OH, MI, MO, MN, 

ND, NE, SD, WI

If you have any questions regarding this form, please contact the appropriate regional office of the Packers and 

Stockyards Program listed above. 

Line No. Subject Instruction 

1 Name Enter name of person signing Weigher’s Acknowledgement and 

Agreement. 

2 Employer Enter name of company weigher is employed by. 

3 City Enter city where weigher will be weighing poultry. 

4 State Enter state where weigher will be weighing poultry. 

5 Weigher Signature The weigher must sign the form in front of a witness. 

6 Witness Signature A witness must sign the form after witnessing the weigher’s signature. 

7 Date Enter date that Weigher’s Acknowledgement and Agreement was signed 

and witnessed. 

Expires 11-30-2017
Order filed April 25, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-12-00292-CR

__________

DONTAVIS GOWAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-1805-C2

O R D E R

On March 21, 2013, this court issued an opinion and judgment in this cause. The State 

timely filed a motion for rehearing, and Appellant, Dontavis Gowan, filed a response as 

requested by this court. We grant the State’s motion for rehearing, and we hereby withdraw our 

opinion and judgment dated March 21, 2013. 

PER CURIAM

April 25, 2013

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Geoffrey G. Meyers, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Manor Care, Inc. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
              ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
              Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
              requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
              the Report.

/s/ Geoffrey G. Meyers

Geoffrey G. Meyers
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 5, 2004
PATRICK G. THURMOND, CSR, RPR 

Official Court Reporter 

173rd Judicial District Court 

Athens, Texas 75751 

903/675-6156 

thurmond1420@gmail.com

April 8, 2015 

MS. CATHY S. LUSK 

Clerk of the Court 

Twelfth Court of Appeals 

1517 West Front Street 

Suite 354 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

IN RE: Reporter’s Request for Extension of Time to File Record in Case No. 12-15-00081-CR, Joshua Paul 

Calhoun v. The State of Texas. 

Dear Ms. Lusk: 

The Reporter’s Record in the above-referenced case is now due on April 13, 2015. For the following reasons, I 

would respectfully request an extension of time to file this record: 

A Notice of Appeal, following a Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal, was not filed in this cause 

until March 30, 2015. 

 

Appellate counsel was not appointed until April 1, 2015. After conversation with counsel I am confident that I will 

receive a request for my transcript sometime this week. 

Given the length and complexity of this record, I will be unable to meet a deadline a mere five days hence; therefore, 

I would request that an extension be granted and a new due date fixed no sooner that May 31, 2015. 

Please contact me if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Patrick G. Thurmond, CSR, RPR 

CC: Hon. Dan Moore, Trial Judge Presiding 

Hon. Nancy Rumar 

 Hon. Leslie Dixon 

 

 

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/8/2015 10:47:49 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
032.-15

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA #14-13-01043-CR

STYLE: Tonv Merlos v The State of Texas

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed

DATE: November 25. 2014 Publish: No

OFFENSE: Indecency with a Child

COUNTY: Austin

th r->:. TRIAL COURT: 155"' District Court

TC CASE #:2011R-0105

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Tonv Merlos v The State of Texas

CCA#

PRO SB Petition CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

032.-/ST

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: OzltVl&OlS

JUDGE: fli^UAAst-A-^.

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

FOR REHEARI

JUDGE:

ING IN CCA IS:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION CONTAINED IN ITS ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         236,316
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,757
<INVENTORY>                                    199,982
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               553,711
<PP&E>                                         942,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                 679,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 815,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,075
<BONDS>                                        242,980
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,361,440
<COMMON>                                       969,834
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,856,375)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   815,954
<SALES>                                      2,316,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,324,036
<CGS>                                        1,771,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  446,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    69
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,416
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 83,936
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,233
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,703
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NO. 04-14-00886-CV

__________________________________________________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

__________________________________________________________________

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

 APPELLANT,

V.

HAYS STREET BRIDGE RESTORATON GROUP

 APPELLEE

__________________________________________________________________

JOINT MOTION TO ABATE

__________________________________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT:

Appellant and Appellee file this joint motion to abate the appeal of this case 

for ninety (90) days and for cause, state as follows:

I.

Pursuant to this Court’s Order of February 9, 2015, the parties to this appeal 

conducted a mediation on March 30, 2015. The parties did not settle their dispute 

at the mediation, but the parties wish to continue their discussions to determine if a 

resolution is possible. It is anticipated that the parties may need ninety (90) days to 

make this determination.

-1- 

ACCEPTED

04-14-00886-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

4/17/2015 10:42:50 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 04/17/2015 10:42:50 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
PRAYER

For these reasons, the parties pray that this appeal be abated or stayed for 90 

days and for such other relief to which they may be entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

Deborah Lynne Klein, Attorney IV

State Bar No. 11556750

Office of the City Attorney

Litigation Division

111 Soledad Street, 10th Floor

San Antonio, TX 78205

(210) 207-8919 – Phone

(210) 207-4357 – Fax

deborah.klein@sanantonio.gov

LAW OFFICE OF DAN POZZA

239 E. Commerce Street

San Antonio, TX 78205

(210) 226-8888 – Phone

(210) 224-6373 – Fax

danpozza@yahoo.com

/s/Dan Pozza

State Bar No. 16224800

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT

/s/Amy Kastely

State Bar No. 24006638

Attorney at Law

233 Lotus Avenue

San Antonio, TX 78210

(210) 216-3241 – Phone

(210) 436-3559 – Fax

amykastely@fastmail.fm

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE

-2-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Freeman, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention on appeal is that the court erred in its charge on reasonable doubt. Defendant did not object to the charge and, therefore, that issue is not preserved for review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the court’s charge was proper *(see, People v Malloy,*55 NY2d 296, 300, 303, *cert denied*459 US 847; *People v Hammond,*143 AD2d 1043; *People v Quinones,*123 AD2d 793, *lv denied*69 NY2d 749). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.—Grand Larceny, 4th Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
Motion Granted; Order filed December 12 , 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00823

- CV

____________ THE VERTICAL TRADING GRO UP, LLC, CURT KRAMER , AND

CARLOS ALBERTO MAYO , Appellant s

V.

ZICIX CORPORATION , Appellee

On App eal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 50613



### O R D E R
On September 13, 2013, the three appellants named above filed notices of appeal from the trial court’s orders denying their special appearances. Curt
Krame r and Carlos Alberto Mayo jointly filed their appellants’ brief on October 17, 2103. The Vertical Trading Group, LLC did not file a brief. On October 31, 2013, counsel for T he Vertical Trading Group, LLC filed a2



### motion to withdraw, which this court granted . New counsel for T he Vertical Trading Group, LLC filed an appearance on December 3, 2013.

On December 5 , 2013, T he Vertical Trading Group, LLC filed a motion
to dismiss its appeal from the order signed August 26, 2013, denying its special

appearance

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. Appellants Curt Kramer and Carlos Alberto Mayo are appealing a separate order signed August 28, 2013, denying their special

appearance. Therefore , this proceeding is severable without prejudice to the remaining parties. See Tex. R. A pp. P. 42.1(b). The motion is granted.
Accordingly
, T he Vertical Trading Group, LLC ’s appeal is ordered
DISMISSED. The Vertical Trading Group, LLC is ordered to pay all costs incurred by its appeal. The appeal filed by Curt Kramer and Carlos Alberto Mayo
remain s pending before this court.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Wise.
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING
PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND
NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE.

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT
THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S
EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT

USDA, AMS, FVP, SCI
831 MITTEN ROAD, ROOM 200
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
PHONE: 650-552-9073
FAX: 650-552-9147

EQUIPMENT CATALOG



LATE LEAF RUST ON RASPBERRIES

Damage Serious Damage

Damage: When affecting more than 2 drupelets.

Serious Damage: When affecting more than 5 drupelets.

USDA Visual Aid RSP-1 July 2018


WHITE DRUPELET

Damage: When affecting 2 or more druplets.

Serious damage: When affecting more than 5 druplets.

USDA Visual Aid RSP-2 July 2018
1 

NO. 01-15-00284-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON 

_________________________________________ 

Latrice Harris, 

Appellant 

v. 

Highland Knolls Community Association, 

Appellee

_________________________________________

DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE 

HIGHLAND KNOLLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION 

_________________________________________

From the Civil County Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County, Texas, 

Trial Court Case No. 908,487 

_________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

Appellee Highland Knolls Community Association (“Appellee”) in 

the above captioned matter, files this Designation of Lead Counsel 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.2 to notify the Court 

that Dawn S. Holiday, State Bar No. 24046090, of Roberts Markel 

Weinberg Butler Hailey PC, 2800 Post Oak Blvd., 57th Floor, Houston, 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00284-cv

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/14/2015 2:16:30 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/14/2015 2:16:30 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2 

Texas 77056, makes an appearance in this appeal as lead counsel of 

record for Appellee. 

Attorney Cliff Davis of Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey 

PC will serve as additional counsel for Appellee. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

ROBERTS MARKEL WEINBERG BUTLER 

HAILEY PC 

/s/ Dawn S. Holiday 

____________________________________

DAWN S. HOLIDAY

TBA No. 24046090 

Cliff Davis 

TBA No. 00792447 

2800 Post Oak Blvd, 57th Floor 

Houston, TX 77056 

(713) 840-1666 

Fax: (713) 840-9404 

dholiday@rmwbhlaw.com

cdavis@rmwhbhlaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE, 

HIGHLAND KNOLLS COMMUNITY 

ASSOCIATION
3 

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to Rule 9.4 i(3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure, I certify that the word count in this Designation of Lead 

Counsel for Appellee is 87 words. 

 

/s/ Dawn S. Holiday 

_________________________________ 

 Dawn S. Holiday 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that pursuant to Tex. R. Civ. P. 21a, a true and 

correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served upon the parties 

listed below by fax, delivery service, messenger, mail, and/or through 

the serving party’s electronic filing service provider, this 14th day of 

April, 2015. 

Via Regular Mail and

Via Certified Mail/RRR: 7010 2780 0003 0285 3297

Latrice L. Harris (Pro Se) 

2310 Enchanted Park Lane 

Katy, TX 77450 

 /s/ Dawn S. Holiday 

 ____________________________________ 

 Dawn S. Holiday