alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 12-13-00357-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TOCARRA LOCKETT A/K/A

TOCARRA MCKIND,

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 420TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

PER CURIAM ORDER

By opinion dated March 25, 2015, this Court reversed the trial court’s judgment of

conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm. Pending before us is Appellant’s motion for

reasonable bail, which he alleges would be a $2,500 surety bond. The State filed a response

requesting that this Court follow Appellant’s recommendation.

Upon reversal of a conviction, a defendant is entitled to release on reasonable bail,

regardless of the length of the term of imprisonment, pending final determination of the appeal

by the State or defendant on petition for petition for discretionary review. TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. ANN. art. 44.04(h) (West 2006). The statute further provides this Court shall determine

the amount of bail if, as here, bail is requested before a petition for discretionary review has been

filed. See id.

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion, it appears to the Court that Appellant is

entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, pursuant to Article 44.04(h), the Court hereby sets

reasonable bail in the amount of $2,500, to be filed with the clerk of the 420th District Court,

conditioned on the sureties being approved by the trial court. See id.

WITNESS the Honorable James T. Worthen, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, 12th

Court of Appeals District of Texas, at Tyler.

FILE COPY
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at my office this the 9th

day of April 2015, A.D.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

12TH COURT OF APPEALS

By: ________________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

n

FILE COPY
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 1305 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 - SW - 041 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
# C_2016202EN.01001701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/17

---

Article 2

The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail.

---
### STATE OFLOUISIANA

VERSUS FREDERICK RODDY NO. 

### 2023 KW 1116 

### FEBRUARY 16, 2024

In Re: Frederick 

### Roddy, applying for 

### supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### DC -21-04680. BEFORE: WELCH, WOLFE, AND STROMBERG, JJ.



### WRIT DENIED AS MOOT. The records of the East Baton Rouge 

### Parish Clerk of Court reflect that the 

### requested documents were 

### mailedto relatoron September 18, 2023.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          23,974
<SECURITIES>                                     2,636
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,166
<INVENTORY>                                     37,562
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,284
<PP&E>                                          60,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,486 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,904
<BONDS>                                         60,248
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,663
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,705
<SALES>                                        269,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               269,189
<CGS>                                          178,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,689<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   719
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,482<F2>
<INCOME-TAX>                                       183
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,299
<DISCONTINUED>                                (15,059)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,760)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.47)<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)
<FN>
<F1>Includes inventory write-downs of $9,063,000.
<F2>Includes gain on sale of business units of $6,290,000.
<F3>For purposes of this exhibit, primary means basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(a)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Progress Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, William D. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ William D.
Johnson


William
D. Johnson


Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer


March 2,
2009








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40531

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHRISTOMO SANTANA-ROJAS, true name Crisostomo Santana-Rojas,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:13-CR-1002-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Cristomo Santana-Rojas has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Santana-Rojas has not filed a response.

The record reflects that Santana-Rojas wishes to appeal his sentence 

only. See United States v. Garcia, 483 F.3d 289, 291 (5th Cir. 2007). Santana 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40531 Document: 00513007823 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2015
No. 14-40531

has completed the confinement portion of his sentence, however, and he has 

been removed from the United States and may not return. Therefore, the 

appeal is moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83

(5th Cir. 2007).

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS 

MOOT.

2

 Case: 14-40531 Document: 00513007823 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2015
NO.

COURT OF APPEALS NO. 03-14-00236-CR 0|

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPFAIS

IN THE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS ^PR 1»7 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

KEVIN TODD HARDIN, pi, nn ,k, Appellant/PetitionerrnilDT^ r"-£U IN

COm°F CRIMINAL APPEALS

v' APR 17 2015

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Ah.t .

Appellee/Respondent Moe'Acosta, Clerk

On appeal from the Third Court of Appeals

Austin, Texas

PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR FILING

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW the Appellant/Petitioner, Kevin Todd Hardin, and

respectfully requests that the time for filing of Petitioner's

Petition for Discretionary Review in the above styled and num

bered cause be extended. In support of this motion Petitioner

would show the Court the following:

I.

Petitioner was convicted of evading arrest with a vehicle

and was sentenced to 99 years' imprisonment. On March 25, 2015,

in Opinion No. 03-14-00236-CR, the Third Court of Appeals affirmed

the judgment of the trial court.

1
II.

Petitioner's Petition for Discretionary Review is due on or

before April 24, 2015. Petitioner respectfully requests an exten

sion of time until June 23, 2015.

III.

No previous extension of time has been requested.

IV.

Petitioner would show the Court that a reasonable explanation

exists for the requested extension. Petitioner is currently incarl

cerated in the Mark W. Michael Unit of the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice - Institutional Division in Tennessee Colony,

Texas. Petitioner has limited access to the Unit law library in

which to prepare his Petition for Discretionary Review. Petitioner

is also proceeding pro se.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Kevin Todd Hardin respect

fully requests that the time for the filing of Petitioner's Peti

tion for Discretionary Review be extended until June 23, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

KEVIN TODD HARDIN

PETITIONER

TDCJ No. 1920319

Mark W. Michael Unit

2664 FM 2054

Tennessee Colony, Texas 75886
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the fore

going motion has been served by placing same in the United States

Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to: Burnet County District At

torney's Office, P.O. Box 725, Llano, Texas 78643 and State Prose

cuting Attorney, P.O. Box 13046, Austin, Texas 78711-3046 on this

7th day of April, 2015.

KEVIN TODD HARDIN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 24, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 17, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 18 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-60, CP2024-61.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-25896 Filed 11-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VI

TRANSPORT

TRANSPORT

Article 91

(ex Article 71 TEC)

(ex Article 71 TEC)

1.   For the purpose of implementing Article 90, and taking into account the distinctive features of transport, the European Parliament and the Council shall, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, lay down:

| (a) | common rules applicable to international transport to or from the territory of a Member State or passing across the territory of one or more Member States; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

common rules applicable to international transport to or from the territory of a Member State or passing across the territory of one or more Member States;

| (b) | the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate transport services within a Member State; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate transport services within a Member State;

| (c) | measures to improve transport safety; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

measures to improve transport safety;

| (d) | any other appropriate provisions. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

any other appropriate provisions.

2.   When the measures referred to in paragraph 1 are adopted, account shall be taken of cases where their application might seriously affect the standard of living and level of employment in certain regions, and the operation of transport facilities.

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**


**OF
      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Sundaresan Raja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





/s/
                Sundaresan RajaSundaresan
                RajaPrincipal
                Executive Officer





November
      19, 2008
#### Greater New York Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists, Respondent, v Oscar Harrison, Appellant.

—Order, Appellate Term, Supreme Court, First Department (Stanley S. Ostrau, P. J., Stanley Parness, William P. McCooe, JJ.), entered January 2, 1990, which affirmed a final judgment of possession of the Civil Court, New York County (Alex J. Colgan, H.J.), entered October 21, 1988, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This is a holdover proceeding brought to recover an apartment located in the Manhattan Church of Seventh-Day Adventists. The petitioner alleged that the apartment was incident to respondent’s employment as custodian, from which he had resigned. Respondent maintained that he and the church had an oral agreement whereby he would be able to reside in *362the apartment as caretaker/watchman for as long as he desired. After trial, the court credited the testimony of petitioner, which was supported by the relevant minutes of the Board Meeting that there was only one agreement, and found that, as respondent was no longer serving as custodian, he was no longer entitled to possession of the apartment. The court also found that the oral agreement violated the Statute of Frauds. The Appellate Term affirmed.

Although there was conflicting testimony, sufficient evidence was before the court to permit the finding that only one oral agreement had been entered into. Further, the oral agreement alleged by the respondent, as the trial court found, violated the Statute of Frauds (General Obligations Law § 5-701). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Sanchez, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Galligan, J., at suppression hearing, jury trial and sentencing), rendered May 23, 1988, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of 15 years to life to run concurrently with two definite one year terms, unanimously affirmed.

While searching for the men who, moments earlier, had sold an undercover officer crack cocaine in an apartment at 518 *518West 146th Street, police officers encountered defendant emerging from an adjacent apartment. Defendant was momentarily detained as officers entered that apartment and discovered narcotics and weapons in plain view.

Defendant does not challenge the determination that he had no legitimate expectation of privacy in the apartment, of which he was neither the owner nor tenant. We similarly find no infirmity in the brief detention of defendant. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
# L_2012112EN.01006001.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ANNEX IV

List referred to in Article 16 of the Act of Accession: other permanent provisions

List referred to in Article 16 of the Act of Accession: other permanent provisions

1.   INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Part Three, Title II, Free Movement of Goods

SPECIFIC MECHANISM

With regard to Croatia, the holder, or the holder's beneficiary, of a patent or Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) for a medicinal product filed in a Member State at the time when such protection could not be obtained in Croatia for that product, may rely on the rights granted by that patent or SPC in order to prevent the import and marketing of that product in the Member State or Member States where the product in question enjoys patent or SPC protection, even if this product was put on the market in Croatia for the first time by the holder or with the holder's consent.

Any person intending to import or market a medicinal product covered by the first paragraph in a Member State where the product enjoys patent or SPC protection shall demonstrate to the competent authorities in the application regarding that import that one month's prior notification has been given to the holder or beneficiary of such protection.

---
# C_2016202EN.01039601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/396 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/396

---

Article 11

Freedom of expression and information

1.   Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.

2.   The freedom and pluralism of the media shall be respected.

---