alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 12012M006 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M006

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE I: COMMON PROVISIONS - Article 6 (ex Article 6 TEU) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0019 - 0019 *

Article 6

(ex Article 6 TEU)

1. The Union recognises the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union of 7 December 2000, as adapted at Strasbourg, on 12 December 2007, which shall have the same legal value as the Treaties.

The provisions of the Charter shall not extend in any way the competences of the Union as defined in the Treaties.

The rights, freedoms and principles in the Charter shall be interpreted in accordance with the general provisions in Title VII of the Charter governing its interpretation and application and with due regard to the explanations referred to in the Charter, that set out the sources of those provisions.

2. The Union shall accede to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Such accession shall not affect the Union's competences as defined in the Treaties.

3. Fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, shall constitute general principles of the Union's law.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 23

                                                            [LOGO]


                  Consent of Independent Public Accountants



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports dated February 11, 2000 included (or incorporated by reference)
in this Form 10-K into Dole Food Company, Inc.'s previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-3 Registration Nos. 33-41480, 33-64984,
333-07849, and 333-61689; Form S-8 Registration Nos. 2-87475, 33-594,
33-28782, 33-60643,33-60641, 33-42152, 333-13739, and 333-06949; and Form N-2
Registration Nos. 333-325 and 811-7499.



/ s / Arthur Andersen LLP
     ----------------------
      Arthur Andersen LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 30, 2000
SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION 

CODE TRACE-BACK LETTER 

TO: 

Specialty Crops Inspection is requesting the following code be traced for domestic origin. The trace must 

show that all major food components are from crops solely grown and processed in the United States. The 

trace must include all supporting documentation substantiating domestic origin. Provide a narrative or flow 

chart explaining the documentation provided. Adequate documentation may include, but is not limited to the 

following: list of growers, raw material receipts, blend records, and/or in-process or production records 

documenting the code traced. 

Contract No. (IDIQ) 

Solicitation No. 

Purchase Order No. 

Contractor 

Commodity 

Date of Pack 

Code to Trace 

Please provide copies of trace-back documentation (with a copy of this request) to our office by 

Signature of Inspector (print & sign name) 

Reason Incomplete/ Remarks: 

Date 

Date of initial request 

Date of follow up request 

Date of final request 

FINAL 

Complete Incomplete Not Submitted 

Signature of Inspector (print & sign name) Date 

NOTE: 

Certificates of Loading will not be issued until code trace-back is verified and accepted. 

Failure to fulfill proof of Domestic Origin may result in a discount or cancellation of your award and may 

affect your ability to do further business with USDA. 

SC-391 (11-2020) USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.36

                                    AMENDMENT
                                    ---------

                                     TO THE
                                     ------

       TRIGON HEALTHCARE, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
       ------------------------------------------------------------------

        AMENDMENT, dated as of April 24, 2002, to the Trigon Healthcare, Inc.
Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") by Trigon Healthcare,
Inc. (the "Company").

        The Company maintains the Plan established effective as of February 19,
1997. The Company has the power to amend the Plan and now wishes to do so.

        NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

        I.   Section 4 is amended by replacing the amount "550,000" with the
amount "950,000" in the first sentence.

        II.  Section 7(b) is amended to replace the last sentence with the
following sentence:

        "The number of shares to be issued shall be rounded down to the next
        whole share and fractional shares shall be disregarded."

        III. Section 12 is amended by adding the following sentences to the
end:

        "Except as provided in Section 15 or with approval of shareholders, an
        Eligible Director may not surrender an Option in consideration for the
        grant of a new Option with a lower exercise price. If an Eligible
        Director's Option is cancelled before its termination date, the Eligible
        Director may not receive another Option within 6 months of the
        cancellation unless the exercise price of such Option is not less than
        the exercise price of the cancelled Option or shareholder approval is
        received of the grant."

        IV.  Sections 2(f), 4, 14(b) and 16 are amended by replacing "Section
13" with "Section 15" each time it appears.

        V.   In all respects not amended, the Plan is ratified and confirmed.

                                   *  *  *  *  *  *

<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to the Plan has been executed on the
date indicated below.

                                                TRIGON HEALTHCARE, INC.


                                                By: _________________________


                                                Date: ________________________
Annapolis, MD Site

Information Provided by Nick Scappini, HaloSource

08/26/2010 11:50 AM

Jesse this site was in Annapolis, MD and we had over 45 people in attendance-We had the AA county soil 

conservation staff, all the AA county sediment control site inspectors, MDE staff and the head guy for the 

state of Md, 3 general contractors, 5 engineering companies, the head of Toll Brothers land development. 

The water coming off of the holding pond was 300-400NTU and we were discharging at 15NTU.

MD10

MD11 MD12
MD13 MD14

MD15 MD16

MD17 MD18
MD19 MD2

MD20 MD21

MD22 MD23
MD24 MD25

MD26 MD27

MD3 MD4
MD5 MD6

MD7 MD8

MD9
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

Independent Auditors' Consent

The
Board of Directors
Tom Brown, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos. 33-42991, 33-60191, 33-60842, 333-13157, 333-30069, 333-42011, 333-56577, 333-69353, 333-89031,
333-89033, 333-31426, 333-51320, 333-57814 and 333-74268 on Form S-8 of Tom Brown, Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Tom
Brown, Inc. as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the
December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Tom Brown, Inc.

KPMG
LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 25, 2003



QuickLinks
Order entered April 15, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01188-CV

HENRY S. MILLER COMMERIAL COMPANY, Appellant

V.

NEWSON, TERRY & NEWSOM, LLP, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 09-1306

ORDER

We GRANT the parties’ April 13, 2015 joint motion to extend mediation and briefing 

deadlines. The mediation deadline is extended to MAY 26, 2015. The parties shall file their 

respective appellees’ and cross-appellee’s briefs by JUNE 12, 2015. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1520 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

<DOC>
                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 21, 2020.
    Resolved, That the House agree to the amendment of the Senate to 
the bill (H.R. 1520) entitled ``An Act to amend the Public Health 
Service Act to provide for the publication of a list of licensed 
biological products, and for other purposes.'', with the following

                  HOUSE AMENDMENT TO SENATE AMENDMENT:

            In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the 
      amendment of the Senate, insert the following:

That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021 (division A of Public Law 
116-159) is further amended by striking the date specified in section 
106(3) and inserting ``December 28, 2020''.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Further Extension of Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2021''.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 1520

_______________________________________________________________________

                  HOUSE AMENDMENT TO SENATE AMENDMENT
```
EXHIBIT 99.1



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Bresler & Reiner, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sidney
M. Bresler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/    SIDNEY M. BRESLER                 
|Sidney M. Bresler Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bresler & Reiner, Inc. and will be retained by Bresler & Reiner, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---



EXHIBIT 99.1



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Bresler & Reiner, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William
J. Donovan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/    WILLIAM J. DONOVAN                 
|William J. Donovan Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bresler & Reiner, Inc. and will be retained by Bresler & Reiner, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Forest G. SMITH, Jr., and Rose Mary Smith, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 18641.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 27, 1963.

*726Ernest R. Mortenson and Eugene Harpole, Pasadena, Cal., for petitioners.

Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., John B. Jones, Jr., Meyer Rothwacks, Norman H. Wolfe, Loring S. Post, Attys., Tax Division, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

Having examined the record and the pertinent authorities, we are satisfied that the decision of the Tax Court must be affirmed.

1. We do not read the stipulation filed with tire Tax Court as precluding consideration of evidence extrinsic to the documents of sale bearing upon the intent of the taxpayer and the purchaser; and, of course, the parole evidence rule could not have that effect as between, the Commissioner and the taxpayer. Thorsness v. United States, 260 F.2d 341, 345 (7th Cir. 1958), and cases cited; Stern v. Commissioner, 137 F.2d 43, 46 (2d Cir. 1943).

2. The court properly held, as a matter of statutory construction, that the assumption of personal obligations of a taxpayer by a solvent third person may be treated as “money received” by the taxpayer, within the meaning of Section 1001(b) of the 1954 Code, to the amount of the obligations assumed. Cf. Crane v. Commissioner, 331 U.S. 1, 12-14, 67 S.Ct. 1047, 91 L.Ed. 1301 (1947); Commissioner v. Fortee Properties, Inc., 211 F.2d 915, 916 (2d Cir., 1954); Parker v. Delaney, 186 F.2d 455, 458 (1st Cir., 1950); R. O’Dell & Sons Co. v. Commissioner, 169 F.2d 247, 248 (3d Cir., 1948); Mendham Corporation v. Commissioner, 9 T.C. 320 (1947).

3. The essential findings of fact of the Tax Court are not clearly erroneous.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1501 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1501

  To allow certain off-duty law enforcement officers and retired law 
 enforcement officers to carry a concealed firearm to protect children 
                           in a school zone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2019

Mrs. Hartzler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To allow certain off-duty law enforcement officers and retired law 
 enforcement officers to carry a concealed firearm to protect children 
                           in a school zone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Police Officers Protecting Children 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN OFF-DUTY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND RETIRED LAW 
              ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ALLOWED TO CARRY A CONCEALED 
              FIREARM, AND DISCHARGE A FIREARM, IN A SCHOOL ZONE.

    Section 922(q) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(B)--
                    (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (vi); 
                and
                    (B) by redesignating clause (vii) as clause (ix) 
                and inserting after clause (vi) the following:
                    ``(vii) by an off-duty law enforcement officer who 
                is a qualified law enforcement officer (as defined in 
                section 926B) and is authorized under such section to 
                carry a concealed firearm, if the firearm is concealed;
                    ``(viii) by a qualified retired law enforcement 
                officer (as defined in section 926C) who is authorized 
                under such section to carry a concealed firearm, if the 
                firearm is concealed; or''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3)(B)--
                    (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (iii);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of clause 
                (iv) and inserting a semicolon; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(v) by an off-duty law enforcement officer who is 
                a qualified law enforcement officer (as defined in 
                section 926B) and is authorized under such section to 
                carry a concealed firearm; or
                    ``(vi) by a qualified retired law enforcement 
                officer (as defined in section 926C) who is authorized 
                under such section to carry a concealed firearm.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          72,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   316,800
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               573,200
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,105,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,421,600
<BONDS>                                        118,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,400
<COMMON>                                        49,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   (607,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,105,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               427,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  435,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,400)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2016203EN.01000901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/9

---

Article 10

The Commission may, by contract, entrust the carrying out of certain parts of the Community research programme to Member States, persons or undertakings, or to third countries, international organisations or nationals of third countries.

---
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: April 16, 2015 519478 

________________________________

In the Matter of ANTHONY 

MEDINA,

Appellant,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting 

Commissioner of Corrections 

and Community Supervision,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: February 24, 2015

Before: Garry, J.P., Rose, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________

Anthony Medina, Romulus, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H.

Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Weinstein,

J.), entered June 20, 2014 in Albany County, which dismissed

petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR

article 78, to review a determination of respondent which found

petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

After he refused several orders to enter his cell and made

threatening comments to a correction sergeant, petitioner was

charged in a misbehavior report with refusing a direct order,

making threats, an inmate movement violation and interference

with an employee. Petitioner was found guilty as charged

following a tier III disciplinary hearing and that determination

was upheld on administrative review. He advanced several

procedural challenges to the determination in this CPLR article
-2- 519478 

78 proceeding. Supreme Court dismissed the petition following

joinder of issue, and petitioner appeals.

We affirm. Petitioner was properly removed from the

hearing after he became disruptive and, indeed, demanded to

return to his cell (see Matter of Sabino v Prack, 101 AD3d 1202,

1203 [2012]). The Hearing Officer thereafter conducted an

appropriate assessment of petitioner's mental state and ability

to participate in the hearing via confidential testimony (see

id.; Matter of Pante v Goord, 73 AD3d 1394, 1395 [2010]). In

light of that confidential testimony, the Hearing Officer did not

err in refusing to call a requested witness who would have

provided redundant testimony regarding petitioner's mental state

(see Matter of Pante v Goord, 73 AD3d at 1395). Petitioner's

remaining contentions have been considered and found to lack

merit.

Garry, J.P., Rose, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Michael and There

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 15, 2015

No. 04-15-00021-CV

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellant

v.

Michael and Theresa HAYES,

Appellees

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CV00284

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On February 24, 2015, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating the 

clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the 

clerk’s fee for preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. 

On February 26, 2015, this court ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court that 

either (1) the clerk’s fee had been paid or arrangements had been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or 

(2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. 

On March 6, 2015, appellant filed a notice of payment. On March 12, this Court ordered 

the clerk’s record be filed in this court by April 3, 2015. The trial court clerk has still not filed 

the clerk’s record. 

It is therefore ORDERED the clerk’s record be filed in this court no later than April 21, 

2015. 

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court