alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1381 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to take actions necessary to 

ensure that certain individuals may update the burn pit registry with 

a registered individual’s cause of death, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2019 

Mr. RUIZ (for himself and Mr. WENSTRUP) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to take actions 

necessary to ensure that certain individuals may update 

the burn pit registry with a registered individual’s cause 

of death, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Burn Pit Registry En5 hancement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BURN PIT REGISTRY UPDATES. 

7 (a) INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO UPDATE.— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1381 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec3 retary of Veterans Affairs shall take actions nec4 essary to ensure that the burn pit registry may be 

5 updated with the cause of death of a deceased reg6 istered individual by— 

7 (A) an individual designated by such de8 ceased registered individual; or 

9 (B) if no such individual is designated, an 

10 immediate family member of such deceased reg11 istered individual. 

12 (2) DESIGNATION.—The Secretary shall pro13 vide, with respect to the burn pit registry, a process 

14 by which a registered individual may make a des15 ignation for purposes of paragraph (1)(A). 

16 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

17 (1) The term ‘‘burn pit registry’’ means the 

18 registry established under section 201 of the Dig19 nified Burial and Other Veterans’ Benefits Improve20 ment Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–260; 38 U.S.C. 

21 527 note). 

22 (2) The term ‘‘immediate family member’’, with 

23 respect to a deceased individual, means— 

24 (A) the spouse, parent, brother, sister, or 

25 adult child of the individual; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1381 IH

1 (B) an adult person to whom the indi2 vidual stands in loco parentis; or 

3 (C) any other adult person— 

4 (i) living in the household of the indi5 vidual at the time of the death of the indi6 vidual; and 

7 (ii) related to the individual by blood 

8 or marriage. 

9 (3) The term ‘‘registered individual’’ means an 

10 individual registered with the burn pit registry. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE X

SOCIAL POLICY

SOCIAL POLICY

Article 160

(ex Article 144 TEC)

(ex Article 144 TEC)

The Council, acting by a simple majority after consulting the European Parliament, shall establish a Social Protection Committee with advisory status to promote cooperation on social protection policies between Member States and with the Commission. The tasks of the Committee shall be:

| — | to monitor the social situation and the development of social protection policies in the Member States and the Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

to monitor the social situation and the development of social protection policies in the Member States and the Union,

| — | to promote exchanges of information, experience and good practice between Member States and with the Commission, |
| --- | --- |

—

to promote exchanges of information, experience and good practice between Member States and with the Commission,

| — | without prejudice to Article 240, to prepare reports, formulate opinions or undertake other work within its fields of competence, at the request of either the Council or the Commission or on its own initiative. |
| --- | --- |

—

without prejudice to Article 240, to prepare reports, formulate opinions or undertake other work within its fields of competence, at the request of either the Council or the Commission or on its own initiative.

In fulfilling its mandate, the Committee shall establish appropriate contacts with management and labour.

Each Member State and the Commission shall appoint two members of the Committee.

---
EXHIBIT 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association
Members/State Street Collective Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Beth M. Halberstadt, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                              /s/ Beth M. Halberstadt
                                             --------------------------
                                             Beth M. Halberstadt
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             May 15, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Jordan, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Cerbone, J., at *Sandoval*hearing, jury trial and sentence), rendered June 20, 1989, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of imprisonment of from 10 to 20 years, 7 *Vi*to 15 years, and *IV2*to 15 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s argument that he was deprived of his due process right to be present at all material stages of his trial because he was not present during the *Sandoval*hearing, is without merit in the circumstances. Inquiry was precluded regarding two prior misdemeanor convictions, limited to only the fact of one prior felony conviction, and permitted as to defendant’s other prior felony conviction and the underlying facts thereof (regarding possession of a stolen automobile). The trial court’s ruling on defendant’s undisputed criminal record, made only after the court duly heard full argument of counsel, clearly constituted a proper exercise of discretion *(see, People v Lee,*168 AD2d 267). Additionally, defendant concedes that "none of the parties attached any significance” to defendant’s absence from the courtroom at the time of the ruling. Nor was there objection so as to preserve the issue. Defendant testified on direct examination that he had, indeed, been convicted previously of two felonies. Thus, defendant has failed to show that his absence from the courtroom at the time of the *Sandoval*ruling had any substantial effect upon his opportunity to defend *(see, e.g., People v Mullen,*44 NY2d 1).

Likewise without merit is defendant’s argument that the *491trial court erred in its charge to the jury regarding the concept of "reasonable doubt.” The court’s explanation, *inter alia,*that a reasonable doubt "is a doubt for which a [juror] could give a reason if he or she were called upon to do so in the jury room” adequately conveyed the appropriate standard *(see, e.g., People v Malloy,*55 NY2d 296, *cert denied*459 US 847).

We perceive no abuse of discretion by the trial court in imposing sentence. The court duly reviewed all available sentencing data, including the circumstances of the instant case, the probation report, defendant’s predicate felon status, and his prior criminal history *(see, e.g., People v Junco,*43 AD2d 266, *affd*35 NY2d 419, *cert denied*421 US 951). Concur —Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2



I, Raymond F. Lancy, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Bridgford Foods Corporation; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No.
1 to Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report.



Dated: February 9, 2018



| | /s/ RAYMOND F. LANCY                                                                                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Raymond F. Lancy
        Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,
        Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1197-1198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00160]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1876]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 32 Under Alternative Site 
Framework; Miami, FL

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of zones;
    Whereas, the Greater Miami Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 32, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ 
Docket B-51-2012, docketed July 13, 2012; amended October 9, 2012) for 
authority to reorganize under the ASF with a service area that includes 
a portion of Miami-Dade County, Florida, within the Miami Customs and 
Border Protection port of entry, FTZ 32's existing Site 1 would be 
categorized as a magnet site, Site 2 would be removed from the zone, 
and Sites 3 and 4 would be categorized as usage-driven sites;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (77 FR 43048-43049, 7/23/2012) and the application, as 
amended, has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal, as 
amended, is in the public interest;

[[Page 1198]]

    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application, as amended, to reorganize FTZ 32 under the 
alternative site framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, to the Board's standard 
2,000-acre activation limit for the zone, and to a three-year ASF 
sunset provision for usage-driven sites that would terminate authority 
for Sites 3 and 4 if no foreign-status merchandise is admitted for a 
bona fide customs purpose by December 31, 2015.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of December 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

ATTEST:----------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-00160 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Town of German Flats et al., as Owners and Operators of Mohawk Valley General Hospital and Another, Plaintiffs, v Aetna Casualty And Surety Company et al., Defendants, and Zurich Insurance Company, as Industrial Risk Insurers, Appellant. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Third-Party Plaintiff, v Hospital Corporation of America et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, cross motion denied, motion granted and counterclaim dismissed. Same Memorandum as in *Town of German Flats v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.*([appeal No. 1] 174 AD2d 1003 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Bergin, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
     We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-96283 onForm S-8 pertaining to The Cato Corporation 1999 IncentiveCompensation Plan, in Registration Statement No. 33-41314on Form S-8 pertaining to The Cato Corporation 1987Incentive Stock Option Plan, in Registration StatementNo. 33-41315 on Form S-8 pertaining to The CatoCorporation 1987 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, and inRegistration Statement Nos. 33-69844 and 333-96285 onForms S-8 pertaining to The Cato Corporation1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of our report datedMarch 31, 2004 relating to the financial statements andfinancial statement schedules, which appears in thisForm 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Charlotte, North CarolinaApril 22, 2004
47
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JULY 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         797,514
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  676,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,191
<INVENTORY>                                     67,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,994,233
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,791,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,123,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,035,008
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,723,765
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,884,631)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,123,930
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,817,795
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,238,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             393,283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (420,934)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (420,934)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (426,050)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (846,984)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.82)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 of ReachLocal, Inc. (the
Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Zorik Gordon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Zorik GordonZorik GordonChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: August 13, 2010
EXHIBIT 4.1
 




	NUMBER
	 
	Overstock.com, Inc.
	 
	SHARES







 
SA
 




	INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF
	 
	SEE REVERSE FOR STATEMENT RELATING TO

	THE STATE OF DELAWARE
	 
	RIGHTS, REFERENCES, PRIVILEGES

	 
	 
	AND RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY

	 
	 
	 

	This Certificates that is 
	 
	CUSIP [_____________]

	 
	 
	 

	the owner of
	 
	 







 
 
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK,
PAR VALUE $0.0001 PER SHARE, OF OVERSTOCK.COM, INC.
 
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.
 
WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signature of its duly authorized officers.
 
Dated
 




	[SIGNATURE ILLEGIBLE]
	 
	[SIGNATURE ILLEGIBLE]







 




	[SEAL]







 




	PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
	 
	SECRETARY







 
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
 
   [_________________]
 




	TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR







 
BY:
 
 










 
 
OVERSTOCK.COM, INC.
 
A statement of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights as established, from time to time, by the Certificate of Incorporation and by any certificate of determination, the number of shares constituting each class and series, and designations thereof, may be obtained by the holder hereof upon request and without charge at the principal office of the Corporation.
 
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:
 




	TEN COM--as tenants in common
	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT--
	 
	Custodian
	 

	TEN ENT--as tenants by the entireties
	 
	(Cust)
	 
	(Minor)

	JT TEN--as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common
	 
	under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act

	 
	 
	(State)

	 
	 

	 
	UNIF TRF MIN ACT--
	Custodian (until age)
	 
	 

	 
	 
	under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	(State)

								






 
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
 
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ___________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
 
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: _________________
# EUR-Lex - 12012M045 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M045

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE V: GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION AND SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Chapter 2: Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy - Section 2: Provisions on the common security and defence policy - Article 45 **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0040 - 0040 *

Article 45

1. The European Defence Agency referred to in Article 42(3), subject to the authority of the Council, shall have as its task to:

(a) contribute to identifying the Member States' military capability objectives and evaluating observance of the capability commitments given by the Member States;

(b) promote harmonisation of operational needs and adoption of effective, compatible procurement methods;

(c) propose multilateral projects to fulfil the objectives in terms of military capabilities, ensure coordination of the programmes implemented by the Member States and management of specific cooperation programmes;

(d) support defence technology research, and coordinate and plan joint research activities and the study of technical solutions meeting future operational needs;

(e) contribute to identifying and, if necessary, implementing any useful measure for strengthening the industrial and technological base of the defence sector and for improving the effectiveness of military expenditure.

2. The European Defence Agency shall be open to all Member States wishing to be part of it. The Council, acting by a qualified majority, shall adopt a decision defining the Agency's statute, seat and operational rules. That decision should take account of the level of effective participation in the Agency's activities. Specific groups shall be set up within the Agency bringing together Member States engaged in joint projects. The Agency shall carry out its tasks in liaison with the Commission where necessary.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 23.2








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We have issued our report dated June 1, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules included in the Annual Report of Capital Southwest Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2019. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Capital Southwest Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-207296, effective October 5, 2015; File No. 333-177433, effective October 21, 2011; File No. 333-177432, effective October 21, 2011; File No. 333-118681, effective August 31, 2004).





/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP





Dallas, Texas


June 4, 2019
# C_2012326EN.01020101.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

PROTOCOL (No 29)

ON THE SYSTEM OF PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN THE MEMBER STATES

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

CONSIDERING that the system of public broadcasting in the Member States is directly related to the democratic, social and cultural needs of each society and to the need to preserve media pluralism,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following interpretive provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

The provisions of the Treaties shall be without prejudice to the competence of Member States to provide for the funding of public service broadcasting and in so far as such funding is granted to broadcasting organisations for the fulfilment of the public service remit as conferred, defined and organised by each Member State, and in so far as such funding does not affect trading conditions and competition in the Union to an extent which would be contrary to the common interest, while the realisation of the remit of that public service shall be taken into account.

---
<Page>
                                                                 ARTHUR ANDERSEN


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report
dated March 20, 2002 covering the audited Financial Statements of Variable
Account D, (and to all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of
this Registration Statement File No. 333-65233 for Fortis Benefits Insurance
Company Variable Account D on Form N-4.

Hartford, Connecticut                                   /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
April 17, 2002