alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Weekly Boxed Beef Individual Item Summary - Overview

This report covers the prior week’s sales of the most commonly produced non-dairybred, steer and 

heifer source individual beef cuts sold by meat companies covered under Mandatory Price Reporting. 

The report has two major sections, the spot market and comprehensive market, with both listed side by 

side for comparison purposes. It should be noted however, that the spot market section is also a 

component within the comprehensive market section.

The spot market section is limited to negotiated type sales which deliver within 21 days to domestic 

locations. The product is unbranded Choice and unbranded Select. Aged or frozen product is excluded. 

This is the same criteria of the LM_XB459 “NATIONAL WEEKLY BOXED BEEF CUTOUT AND BOXED BEEF 

CUTS - Negotiated Sales” report, from which this spot market section is derived. The LM_XB459 in turn 

is derived from the LM_XB403 “NATIONAL DAILY BOXED BEEF CUTOUT AND BOXED BEEF CUTS –

Negotiated Sales” report.

The comprehensive market section includes: all sales types (negotiated, formula, forward contract); all 

destinations (domestic and export); all delivery periods; all quality designations (Prime, Choice, Select, 

ungraded, branded and unbranded); fresh, frozen and aged product. This is the same criteria of the 

LM_XB463 “NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE BOXED BEEF CUTOUT - ALL FED STEER/HEIFER SALES” report, 

which derives its overall cutout from the individual beef cut values in this comprehensive market 

section. The “Choice or Higher”, “Delivery 22/up”, “Export” and “Formula” columns give the 

percentage of the total comprehensive sales volume matching each separate criterion. This data is

intended to provide additional information concerning individual items while preserving confidentiality.

The “Choice and Select spot % of Comprehensive” reveals how much of the comprehensive market for 

the specific beef cuts on this report is represented by Choice and Select product trading daily on the 

LM_XB403 spot market.
COMMITTEE ROSTER

AREA II COLORADO POTATO ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE

Producers

Members: Alternates:

Rio Grande Mark Peterson

Monte Vista, CO 

Matthew Seger

Del Norte, CO

Roger Mix

Center, CO

Jason McCoy

Monte Vista, CO

Saguache/Chaffee Kent Palmgren

Center, CO

J. Kent Price

Center, CO

Sheldon Rockey

Center, CO

Derek W. Schreck

Center, CO

Conejos/Costilla Virgil F. Valdez

Alamosa, CO

Byron A. Kunugi

Blanca, CO 

Alamosa Arthur Holland

Hooper, CO

Erin Nissen

Mosca, CO

Tyler Mitchell

Monte Vista, CO 

Miguel A. Diaz

Alamosa, CO

All Other Counties Vacant Vacant

Certified Seed

Producer at Large

Robert T. Mattive

Monte Vista, CO

David Bothell

Center, CO

Handlers

Bulk Shippers Brian Harrison

Center, CO

David A. Warsh

Center, CO

Doug Cooper

Monte Vista, CO

Molli McBride

Monte Vista, CO

Other Than Bulk William L. Alderete

Center, CO

Jeffery McCullough

Monte Vista, CO

Jason Tillman

Monte Vista, CO 

Matthew Smartt

Monte Vista, CO

Jared B. Smith

Blanca, CO

Stephanie Chandler

Mosca, CO
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART FIVE

THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

TITLE III

COOPERATION WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AND HUMANITARIAN AID

COOPERATION WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AND HUMANITARIAN AID

CHAPTER 2

ECONOMIC, FINANCIAL AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION WITH THIRD COUNTRIES

Article 212

(ex Article 181a TEC)

(ex Article 181a

1.   Without prejudice to the other provisions of the Treaties, and in particular Articles 208 to 211, the Union shall carry out economic, financial and technical cooperation measures, including assistance, in particular financial assistance, with third countries other than developing countries. Such measures shall be consistent with the development policy of the Union and shall be carried out within the framework of the principles and objectives of its external action. The Union's operations and those of the Member States shall complement and reinforce each other.

2.   The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall adopt the measures necessary for the implementation of paragraph 1.

3.   Within their respective spheres of competence, the Union and the Member States shall cooperate with third countries and the competent international organisations. The arrangements for Union cooperation may be the subject of agreements between the Union and the third parties concerned.

The first subparagraph shall be without prejudice to the Member States' competence to negotiate in international bodies and to conclude international agreements.

---
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I, Bowen S. Diehl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:
 
 1The Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2020, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 2, 2020 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.
 
 Date:  June 2, 2020By:/s/ Bowen S. DiehlBowen S. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1202 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1202

         To reauthorize the Blue Ridge National Heritage Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2019

 Mr. McHenry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To reauthorize the Blue Ridge National Heritage Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Blue Ridge National Heritage Area 
Reauthorization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE BLUE RIDGE NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.

    Section 140 of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 2004 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 108-108; 
117 Stat. 1280) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (i)(1), by striking ``$12,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$14,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (j), by striking ``the date'' and all 
        that follows through ``of this section'' and inserting 
        ``September 30, 2021''.
                                 <all>
```
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-15-00153-CR 

________________________

WILLIAM FLOYD, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

 

On Appeal from County Court at Law 

Hays County, Texas1 

Trial Court No. 14-0164CR; Honorable David Glickler, Presiding 

 

April 16, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

 Appellant, William Floyd, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s written 

order denying his motion to suppress. We dismiss this purported appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

 

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by 

the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001

(West 2005). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Third Court of Appeals and that 

of this Court on any relevant issue. TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
2

On March 6, 2015, Appellant filed Defendant’s Notice of Appeal purporting to 

appeal the trial court’s “Order denying Defendant’s Motion to Suppress” signed 

February 24, 2015. Pursuant to an inquiry by the Clerk of this Court, we know that 

following entry of that order, further proceedings in the trial court ceased with no 

judgment having been entered. 

The State is entitled to pursue an interlocutory appeal from the granting of a 

motion to suppress. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.01(a)(5) (West Supp. 2014). 

However, there is no comparable statute or rule that allows a defendant to appeal an 

interlocutory order denying a motion to suppress. See Dahlem v. State, 322 S.W.3d 

685, 690-91 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2010, pet. ref’d) (holding that an order denying a 

motion to suppress is not an “appealable order” for purposes of a defendant’s right of 

appeal pursuant to article 44.02 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure);

2

Jenkins v. 

State, No. 03-13-00632-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 13288 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 25, 

2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (finding no right of appeal from 

an interlocutory order denying a pretrial motion to suppress).

There being no final judgment of guilt or other appealable order, this appeal is 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

 

2

The State’s right to appeal from an interlocutory order granting a motion to suppress is 

governed by a different statute and different rules. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.01(a)(5).
----

|  | 1. | The Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2016 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June 14, 2016 | By:    | /s/ Michael S. Sarner   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Michael S. Sarner       |   |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
PORK LMR WEBINAR SERIES-FALL 2021

Part I: Overview of Livestock Mandatory Reports for the Pork Industry

Tuesday, October 12, 2021, 11:00 am – 12:30 pm Central Time

National Pork Producers Council will provide an in-depth history of LMR and how it has evolved. USDA Market News will give an 

overview of LMR reporting and provide participants with general information about USDA reports and services offered to industry. 

USDA Packers and Stockyards will discuss the Swine Contract Library and its relevance to the marketplace. The USDA National 

Agricultural Statistics Service will explain how the Hogs and Pigs report is developed and its value to industry.

Neil Dierks is Chief Executive Officer of the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC), responsible

for overall implementation of NPPC programs. Since 1990, he has served NPPC in a series of senior 

executive positions, including Executive Director of Operations, VP for Research and Education, and 

Senior VP for Programs. Previously, Neil was Special Activities Director for the Iowa Pork Producers 

Association and Marketing Director for the Iowa Corn Promotion Board. He currently serves on the 

Supporters of Ag Research Foundation Board of Directors, the Board and Executive Committee of 

the Charles Valentine Riley Memorial Foundation, and is a recipient of the Distinguished Support of 

Animal Science Award from the American Society of Animal Science.

Lakisha Aller serves as Assistant Chief with the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service’s Livestock, Poultry, and Grain Market News office in Des Moines, IA. She has been with USDA for over 

20 years and was a poultry market reporter prior to becoming a Supervisory Market Reporter and 

Assistant Chief overseeing hogs, pork, poultry, and eggs. Lakisha holds a B.S. degree in Agricultural 

Education from Iowa State University.

Travis Averill is the Chief - Livestock Branch with the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service’s Statistics Division. Prior to his current role, Travis served as the Deputy Regional Director for the 

Pacific Regional Office in Sacramento, CA. He previously held the roles of National Cattle Statistician 

and Dairy Product Prices Statistician in Washington, DC, and Statistician in the Delaware/Maryland 

Field Office in Annapolis, MD, and the New England Field Office in Concord, NH.

Jennifer Hopes is a Marketing Specialist and the Swine Contract Library Coordinator with the

USDA Packers and Stockyards Division. Before joining the USDA in 2017, Jennifer spent time serving in 

the U.S. Navy.

REGISTER HERE

September 2021. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00128-CR

IN RE Eduardo TREVINO

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 8, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED AS MOOT

On March 9, 2015, relator Eduardo Trevino filed a petition for writ of mandamus

complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on a pending motion. However, on March 20, 2015, 

the trial court signed an order granting the motion in part and denying it in part. Accordingly, the 

petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

Additionally, relator requested leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus. No leave is 

required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. TEX.R. APP. P. 52. Therefore, relator’s 

request for leave to file is also denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 1999CR4085, 1999CR6204, and 1999CR6205, each styled The State of 

Texas v. Eduardo Trevino, pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Lorina 

I. Rummel presiding.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tom Brown, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James D. Lightner, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



James
D. Lightner Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentMarch 25, 2003



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Lubys, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
August 27, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Christopher J. Pappas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  |                          
|----- |  | ------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------
|Date: |  | March 2, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Christopher J. Pappas
|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  | Christopher J. Pappas    
|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  | President and            
|      |  |               |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer  



25
Official Listing of Approved Finished Hog Suppliers to the PFEU Program

Page 1 of 1

Last Revised May 23, 2023

Company Name Approval Information

Schwartz Farms, Inc.

32296 190th Street

Sleepy Eye, MN 56085

Phone: (507) 794-5779

Contact: Danielle Havemeier

Email: dhavemeier@schwartzfarms.net

PFEU Approval No. PE1038DA

Effective Date: February 7, 2003

Smithfield Hog Production

2822 Hwy 24 W

Warsaw, NC 28398

Phone: (515) 986-0637 

Contact: Ann Stahly

Email: astahly@smithfield.com

PFEU Approval No. PV9253MMA

Effective Date: October 11, 2019

Wakefield Pork

PO Box 327

110 Sixth Street

Gaylord, MN 55334

Phone: (507) 237-5581

Fax: (507) 237-5584

Contact: Steve Langhorst

Email: mary_langhorst@wakefieldpork.com

PFEU Approval No. PE1037DA

Effective Date: February 5, 2003
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, D.C. KING, S.A. DOMINGUEZ

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JANOY K. NELSON

PRIVATE (E-1), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400438

GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 26 September 2014.

Military Judge: LtCol V.C. Danyluk, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commander, Marine Corps Base, 

Quantico, VA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: Maj Troy H. 

Campbell, USMC.

For Appellant: CAPT Jill James, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

16 April 2015

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
District of Columbia 

Court of Appeals 

No. 14-AA-0002

MESKEREM GETACHEW,

Petitioner,

v. DOES-2068-13 

OMNI SHOREHAM,

Respondent.

BEFORE: Fisher and Blackburne-Rigsby, Associate Judges; and Ferren, 

Senior Judge.

ORDER

On consideration of the motion filed by the District of Columbia Office of 

Administrative Hearings requesting that this court publish its December 15, 2014, 

memorandum opinion and judgment, no opposition having been filed, and it further 

appearing that the mandate issued on January 8, 2015, it is

ORDERED sua sponte that the Clerk shall recall the mandate issued on January 8, 

2015. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to publish the memorandum opinion and 

judgment is granted, and the Clerk issue the attached opinion forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Copies to:

Meskerem Getachew Jamarle Thomas

8794 Walutes Circle Paralegal Specialist

Alexandria, VA 22309 Office of Administrative Hearings

Rachel Lukens, Esq. Omni Shoreham

Supervisory Attorney-Advisor c/o Equifax Workforce Solutions

Office of Administrative Hearings P.O. Box 283

Saint Louis, MO 63166
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         839,663
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,197,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,633,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,213,878
<PP&E>                                       5,671,839
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,902,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,818,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,447,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       417,979
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,368,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,818,613
<SALES>                                     20,803,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,803,518
<CGS>                                       17,379,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,379,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,325,071
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                24,669
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             227,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                846,744
<INCOME-TAX>                                   100,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            746,244
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   746,244
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1288 

To ensure due process protections of individuals in the United States against 

unlawful detention based solely on a protected characteristic. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. TAKANO (for himself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. NORTON, Ms. JUDY CHU

of California, and Mr. MCGOVERN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To ensure due process protections of individuals in the 

United States against unlawful detention based solely 

on a protected characteristic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Korematsu-Takai Civil 

5 Liberties Protection Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST UNLAWFUL DETENTION. 

7 Section 4001 of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1288 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub2 section (c); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(b) PROHIBITION ON DETENTION BASED ON PRO6 TECTED CHARACTERISTICS.— 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No individual may be im8 prisoned or otherwise detained based solely on an ac9 tual or perceived protected characteristic of the indi10 vidual. 

11 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term 

12 ‘protected characteristic’ includes each of the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(A) Race. 

15 ‘‘(B) Ethnicity. 

16 ‘‘(C) National origin. 

17 ‘‘(D) Religion. 

18 ‘‘(E) Sex. 

19 ‘‘(F) Gender identity. 

20 ‘‘(G) Sexual orientation. 

21 ‘‘(H) Disability. 

22 ‘‘(I) Any additional characteristic that the 

23 Attorney General determines to be a protected 

24 characteristic. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1288 IH

1 ‘‘(3) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in 

2 this subsection shall be construed to allow the Attor3 ney General to remove a characteristic described in 

4 subparagraphs (A) through (H) of paragraph (2) 

5 from the definition of the term ‘protected char6 acteristic’ under this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS