alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Donald Byron MARSDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 3957.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Jan. 26, 1979.

Mary E. Greene, Asst. Public Defender, Fairbanks, Brian C. Shortell, Public Defender, Anchorage, for appellant.

Rhonda F. Butterfield, Asst. Dist. Atty., Harry L. Davis, Dist. Atty., Fairbanks, Av-rum Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NO WITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of AS ll.-15.220 and sentenced to four years incarceration with two years suspended. He appeals on the grounds that the sentence is excessive and the trial court was inadequately advised as to his alcoholism.

At the time appellant committed the offense he was twenty years old. This is his first felony conviction; however he has a prior misdemeanor assault conviction, two prior convictions for carrying a concealed weapon, and four disorderly conduct convictions.

The offense in question occurred when appellant struck a total stranger in the face with a pool cue and then beat him across the back until he was restrained by others. The victim was injured and required minor plastic surgery. Appellant had apparently mistaken the victim for a person who had taken money from him under false pretenses.

We believe that the sentence is not excessive and that in passing it the trial court was adequately informed. Appellant did not request a psychiatric evaluation before he was sentenced and did not object to the absence of such an evaluation at the time he was sentenced.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2016203EN.01003301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/33

---

Article 82

Inspectors shall be recruited by the Commission.

They shall be responsible for obtaining and verifying the records referred to in Article 79. They shall report any infringement to the Commission.

The Commission may issue a directive calling upon the Member State concerned to take, by a time limit set by the Commission, all measures necessary to bring such infringement to an end; it shall inform the Council thereof.

If the Member State does not comply with the Commission directive by the time limit set, the Commission or any Member State concerned may, in derogation from Articles 258 and 259 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union direct.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act, of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

# DATE AND TIME:

The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on January 10, 2013, from 9:00 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available) and parts will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

## Open Session

### Approval of Minutes

    - December 13, 2012

### Reports

    - Auditor's Report on FCA FY 2012/2011 Financial Statements

##                     Closed Session*                                    

    - Executive Meeting with Auditors

Dated: January 2, 2013.

Dale L. Aultman,

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

# Footnotes

*Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2).
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2013-00075 Filed 1-3-13; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Christopher A. Prine

Clerk, First Court ofAppeals

First Court ofAppeals

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

In re: Mandeville VMandeville, No. 01-15-00119-CV

Charles Mandeville, V

1323 Sunset Lane

Guymon, OK 73942

(505)417-9933

southwest_biiftdiesel@hushmail.com

April 5,2015

• > TEXAS

AP* IS 20,5

CLEf), "TV?***

Dear Mr. Prine,

In preparing to write my opening brief and reviewing the trial court clerk's record (as well as the

online record for thisCourt)* it's; come to my attention mat a critical ite^

Therecordshows the clerkas fili^myMbtibn FbrNew TrialDecember 24,2014: (Seeclerk's

record p. 7). However,the clerk in factreceived (and date stan^

2014. This datewas subsequentlyCrossed outandthenre^date stamped the24th.1 Since thefinal

judgment date was Noyembef 12,2014, the filing date &>i this motibn is critical to the timeliness

of this appeal: Pursuant to TiR,A.P. 34.5(d), I amhereby formally requesting thatthe datebe

corrected to reflect the motion being filed that date it was first received, December 12,2014.

Thank ypu.

Sincerely,

'Although itdoes not appear tobeinthe record, the reason given bythe clerk for doing

thiswas because a filing fee hadinadvertently notbeenincluded in themailing thathadbeen

receivedDecember 12 . Approximately 10 days latertheclerk returned the filmg to mewith a

letter about the missing fee. I then immediatelyresubmittedmeMbti

theclerk received Descember 24, This was noted in myNotice ofAppeal; TKave been unable to

find any authority for aclerktoeMerreject filmgs for lackbfa fee payment (as opposed to

sending a letteraboutan^smgfeef), orto sunimarily crbss-^^
•i<\ 1 tl i

Iff/^•/ 1(i h 1-'

ill •

*.«••».

S7; -...J

'I '•«'.

Ss £!J"

>•—

J&.

\i ^•"i

s-f

-.tS > *

i-i &. ~ -»(>

3*1 W\

rTM Sk 4%

4? 4
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 11, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-30797 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DONALD RAY DAVIS, also known as Dog Man, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(02-CR-50062-ALL)
Before, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
C ourt-appointed appellate counsel for Donald Ray Davis has

m oved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Davis was advised of the motion and served with a copy of his counsel’s brief, but has not filed a response.
Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Appointed counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused fromfurther responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED
. S ee 5 TH C IR .

R. 42.2.
MOTION GRANTED ; APPEAL DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          54,020                  23,047
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,610,735               1,675,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    128,847                 136,485
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,120,264               2,018,780
<PP&E>                                       2,173,676               1,958,250
<DEPRECIATION>                               (478,702)               (436,674)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,025,759               4,516,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (1,835,400)             (1,753,094)
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                   (75,418)                (75,418)
<COMMON>                                       (1,526)                 (1,518)
<OTHER-SE>                                   (978,129)             (1,017,607)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (5,025,759)             (4,516,903)
<SALES>                                    (3,278,214)             (2,684,339)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (3,278,214)             (2,684,339)
<CGS>                                        3,170,299               2,586,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,170,299               2,586,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,239                   1,316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,091                  13,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,043)                (43,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,602                  11,447
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,441)                (32,128)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,441)                (32,128)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15                    0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14                    0.19
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants first fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Stephen L. ClantonStephen L. ClantonChief Financial Officer
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1250 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Lucas Lowe Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 1250 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LUCAS LOWE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 11158 Highway 146 North in 

4 Hardin, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Lucas Lowe Memorial Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lucas Lowe Memorial 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

C.   DECLARATIONS BY MEMBER STATES

DECLARATIONS BY MEMBER STATES

65.   Declaration by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on Article 75 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on Article 75 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The United Kingdom fully supports robust action with regard to adopting financial sanctions designed to prevent and combat terrorism and related activities. Therefore, the United Kingdom declares that it intends to exercise its right under Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice to take part in the adoption of all proposals made under Article 75 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Stallings, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that the verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). We further find no basis to disturb the trial court’s refusal to suppress defendant’s confession. Sufficient evidence is present in the record to support the suppression court’s finding that defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived his *Miranda*rights *(see, e.g., People v Miles,*115 AD2d 962, 963, *lv denied*67 NY2d 654). Defendant also contends that the court’s identification charge was insufficient. Because no objection was made to the alleged error, it has not been preserved for our review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J.—Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Lawton, Lowery and Davis, JJ.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SEVEN

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 341

(ex Article 289 TEC)

(ex Article 289 TEC)

The seat of the institutions of the Union shall be determined by common accord of the governments of the Member States.

---
Connecting with

Underserved 

Producers

The Local Food 

Purchase Assistance 

(LFPA) Cooperative 

Agreement: 

Empowers states and tribal 

governments to purchase domestic 

foods from local, regional, and 

underserved producers, and helps 

these producers navigate the 

procurement process.

June 2022.

USDA is an equal 

opportunity 

provider, 

employer and 

lender.

State and Tribal 

governments may connect 

with producers by partnering with 

state government agencies, universities 

and extension services, community-based 

organizations and non-profits, and federal 

agencies.

These partners may be subrecipients for LFPA 

and conduct purchasing and outreach for the 

state and tribal governments. 

For additional assistance, visit the USDA 

Farm Service Agency and Office of 

Partnership and Public Engagement 

(2501 Program) websites.

If they wish to, State and Tribal 

governments may engage with 

underserved producers through direct 

outreach:

• Meet with industry groups.

• Providing technical assistance to facilitate 

participation in the LFPA program. 

• Market to producers through radio, 

social media, etc. 

•Develop resources in multiple 

languages.

Visit the AMS LFPA 

outreach page for more 

info.

Direct Connections Collaboration
SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION

ALMOND SALMONELLA VERIFICATION PROGRAM

TREATMENT PROCESS VERIFICATION REPORT

A. Verification

Start Time: Date:

Certificate No.: Hours: Miles:

B. Processor Name & Address C. Name & Address (if different from A.)

Company Name: Company Name:

Address: Address:

Company Contact Name: Company Contact Name:

Phone: Phone:

Email: Email:

D. Treatment

Treatment Process Location:

Treatment Process:

Blancher Oil Roaster Dry Roaster PPO Chamber

Other Approved Process: Other Process:

Equipment I.D.: Serial No.:

Validation No.: Validation Date:

E. Described Treatment Process

Meets Process

Yes No

Documents are available showing that TERP has evaluated the process.

The above listed process has been validated by an ABC approved Process Authority.

Validation and review has been completed within the appropriate time frame.

The approved treatment processes are being met. 

Proper documentation is available and shows that treatment processes are within described and approved limits. 

F. Observations (include Lot I.D.)

Non-Conformities and Corrective Action Requests attached Yes N/A

G. Certification

I have reviewed the above described Salmonella treatment processes for raw almonds and do hereby state that on the above date the processes

are being followed are not being followed, as validated.

Signature: Print Name:

Office: Phone:

Email:

For Internal Use: Initial Second Monthly First Quarterly Second Quarterly Bi-annual

SC-184-7a (04-17) Destroy previous editions. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Carter-Wallace, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-00499) on Form S-8 of Carter-Wallace, Inc. of our report dated May 18, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Carter-Wallace, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, retained earnings and comprehensive earnings, and cash
flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2001, and
related financial statement schedule which report appears in the March 31, 2001
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Carter-Wallace, Inc.



                                                   KPMG LLP



New York, New York
June 21, 2001
Independent Auditors' Consent


 

 EXHIBIT 10(i)

 








INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT


 



To the Board of Directors of




Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company


 



        We consent to the use in this Post Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement No. 333-45039 on Form N-4 of our
report dated February 15, 2002 for the Panorama Premier Segment of Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 4 and of our report dual dated March 1, 2002 and March 9, 2002, on Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs referring to the use of statutory accounting practices and the change in certain accounting practices as a result of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Insurance’s
adoption of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual effective January 1, 2001, all of which practices differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America),
appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Statement of Additional Information.


 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Hartford, Connecticut



April 25, 2002