alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
0 

Saitta 

ibbons 

erroneous interpretation of the controlling law and did not reach the other 

issues colorably asserted.' Accordingly, we 

REVERSE the order granting summary judgment AND 

REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings 

consistent with this order. 

cc: Eighth Judicial District Court Dept. 15 

James S. Kent 

Patrick K. McKnight 

Akerman LLP/Las Vegas 

Malcolm Cisneros 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'Respondent contends that appellant's arguments regarding NRS 

116.3116(2) have been waived since appellant failed to raise those 

arguments in opposing respondent's motion for summary judgment. We 

disagree, as appellant raised those arguments in its July 26, 2012, motion 

for declaratory relief, which was part of the district court record when the 

district court granted summary judgment in respondent's favor. See Rust 

v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987) 

(recognizing that "[t]he district court's oral pronouncement from the bench 

[or] the clerk's minute order. . . are ineffective for any purpose"). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A eio
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00225-CV

In re Enrique Alvarez

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the district court’s order

dated April 2, 2015, and accompanying motion for temporary relief are denied. See Tex. R. App.

P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland

Filed: April 16, 2015
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *434William Massey, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dennis Edwards, J.), rendered March 19, 1985, convicting defendant after a jury trial of grand larceny in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 3 VS to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

On December 5, 1983 defendant duped an unsuspecting visitor to Manhattan into entrusting her car to him to be parked. Five days later, following a car chase in upper Manhattan, defendant was arrested and the victim’s car was recovered. Defendant testified that he took the car because he had to babysit while his wife took her mother to a clinic.

Defendant’s argument that his justification defense was not disproved is meritless. There is no view of the evidence that could have lead a jury to find that defendant’s conduct was justifiable according to ordinary standards of intelligence and morality (Penal Law § 35.05 [2]; *People v Padgett,*60 NY2d 142). Nor is there merit to defendant’s claim that the court should have given a justification charge on its own initiative. *(People v Watts,*57 NY2d 299.)

Since defendant failed to object at trial to the introduction of evidence which allegedly referred to uncharged crimes on that ground, the issue has not been preserved as an issue of law. (CPL 470.05; *People v Ligion,*172 AD2d 230.) In any event, the error, if any, was harmless. The proof of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming. *(People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230.) We further find that defendant’s sentence was not excessive. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
|                                       |   |                        |   | Percentage      of Outstanding Stock |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   | Place      of Incorporation |   | or      Ownership Interest Held      |   |
| Name      of Subsidiary                    |   | or      Organization        |   | by      Registrant                   |   |
|                                       |   |                        |   |                                 |   |
| Cal-Maine      Farms, Inc.                 |   | Delaware                    |   |                                 | 100    | % |
|                                       |   |                        |   |                                 |   |   |
| Southern      Equipment Distributors, Inc. |   | Mississippi                 |   |                                 | 100    | % |
|                                       |   |                        |   |                                 |   |   |
| South      Texas Applicators, Inc.         |   | Delaware                    |   |                                 | 100    | % |
|                                       |   |                        |   |                                 |   |   |
| CMF      of Kansas, LLC                    |   | Delaware                    |   |                                 | (1     | ) |
|                                       |   |                        |   |                                 |   |   |
| American      Egg Products, Inc.           |   | Georgia                     |   |                                 | 99.5   | % |
|                                       |   |                        |   |                                 |   |   |
| Texas      Egg Products, LLC               |   | Texas                       |   |                                 | 36.7   | % |
|                                       |   |                        |   |                                 |   |   |
| Benton      County Foods, LLC              |   | Arkansas                    |   |                                 | 100    | % |
|                                       |   |                        |   |                                 |   |   |
| South      Texas Protein, LLC              |   | Texas                       |   |                                 | 42.5   | % |

----

| (1) | Limited      liability company of which Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Cal-Maine Farms, Inc.      are members and have 99% and 1% interests,  respectively. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

41.   Declaration on Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference declares that the reference in Article 352(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to objectives of the Union refers to the objectives as set out in Article 3(2) and (3) of the Treaty on European Union and to the objectives of Article 3(5) of the said Treaty with respect to external action under Part Five of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It is therefore excluded that an action based on Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union would only pursue objectives set out in Article 3(1) of the Treaty on European Union. In this connection, the Conference notes that in accordance with Article 31(1) of the Treaty on European Union, legislative acts may not be adopted in the area of the Common Foreign and Security Policy.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,588,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,828,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (70,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     51,104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,398,288
<PP&E>                                      24,707,550
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,396,414)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,393,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,016,486
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        277
<COMMON>                                       122,367
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,711,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,393,914
<SALES>                                      1,608,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,770,586
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  883,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               406,307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             5,050,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             321,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,516,730)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,992,547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (1,432,973)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,026,406)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.42)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SEVEN

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 338

(ex Article 285 TEC)

(ex Article 285 TEC)

1.   Without prejudice to Article 5 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall adopt measures for the production of statistics where necessary for the performance of the activities of the Union.

2.   The production of Union statistics shall conform to impartiality, reliability, objectivity, scientific independence, cost-effectiveness and statistical confidentiality; it shall not entail excessive burdens on economic operators.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 4

THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK

Article 309

(ex Article 267 TEC)

(ex Article 267 TEC)

The task of the European Investment Bank shall be to contribute, by having recourse to the capital market and utilising its own resources, to the balanced and steady development of the internal market in the interest of the Union. For this purpose the Bank shall, operating on a non-profit-making basis, grant loans and give guarantees which facilitate the financing of the following projects in all sectors of the economy:

| (a) | projects for developing less-developed regions; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

projects for developing less-developed regions;

| (b) | projects for modernising or converting undertakings or for developing fresh activities called for by the establishment or functioning of the internal market, where these projects are of such a size or nature that they cannot be entirely financed by the various means available in the individual Member States; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

projects for modernising or converting undertakings or for developing fresh activities called for by the establishment or functioning of the internal market, where these projects are of such a size or nature that they cannot be entirely financed by the various means available in the individual Member States;

| (c) | projects of common interest to several Member States which are of such a size or nature that they cannot be entirely financed by the various means available in the individual Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

projects of common interest to several Member States which are of such a size or nature that they cannot be entirely financed by the various means available in the individual Member States.

In carrying out its task, the Bank shall facilitate the financing of investment programmes in conjunction with assistance from the Structural Funds and other Union Financial Instruments.

---
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART ONE

PRINCIPLES

PRINCIPLES

Article 8

The application of the original Treaties and acts adopted by the institutions shall, as a transitional measure, be subject to the derogations provided for in this Act.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 5

SECTION 5

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 280

(ex Article 244 TEC)

(ex Article 244 TEC)

The judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union shall be enforceable under the conditions laid down in Article 299.

---
The USDA prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, 

age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual 

orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in 

employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or 

employment activities.) To file a complaint of discrimination, write: USDA, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of 

Adjudication, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (866) 632-9992 (Toll-free Customer Service), (800) 877-8339 

(Local or Federal relay), (866) 377-8642 (Relay voice users). 

DATE: August 8, 2014

USDA CATFISH PURCHASE PROGRAM ANNOUNCED: 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture today announced plans to purchase un-breaded raw catfish 

fillets (110390) for Federal food and nutrition assistance programs.

A conference call, to discuss this opportunity with interested suppliers, will be held on Tuesday, 

August 12, 2014 at 2:30 pm EST (1:30 pm CST). The conference call-in number is 1-888-844-

9904; the access code is 1801764#. 

An Invitation for Bid (solicitation) will be issued in the fall. The solicitation will be issued for 

deliveries January 1, 2015, through June 30, 2015. All proposals must be submitted 

electronically through the Web-Based Supply Chain Management (WBSCM) website at 

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid=WBSCM. Offers submitted by any 

means other than WBSCM will be considered non-responsive. 

Offerors are urged to review all documents as they pertain to this program, including the AMS 

Master Solicitation for Commodity Procurements, dated April 2014; Supplement 511 to the 

AMS Master Solicitation for the Purchase of Catfish Products, dated April 2014; and the 

Qualification Requirements for Prospective Vendors, dated June 2014. These documents are 

available on the AMS Commodity Procurement website at 

www.ams.usda.gov/commoditypurchasing.

Offerors must read all terms of the applicable Solicitation when it is issued. To receive electronic 

(e-mail) notification of the issuance of these solicitations, see the “Subscribe to AMS CP News 

(link)” available on the AMS Commodity Procurement website. Inquiries may be made by 

telephoning (202) 720-4517 or addressing the Contracting Officer, USDA/AMS Commodity 

Procurement Staff, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, STOP 0239, Washington, DC 20250-0256. 

An electronic version of this Purchase Announcement can be obtained through the World Wide 

Web via the Commodity Procurement Home Page at: 

http://www.ams.usda.gov/commoditypurchasing
391 A.2d 676

#### Commonwealth v. Joseph Brown, Appellant.

*589Argued March 29, 1978.

John F. Pyfer, Jr., with him Allison, Weglarz & Pyfer, for appellant; Louise G. Herr, Assistant District Attorney, with her D. Richard Eckman, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s claims of trial error are without merit. However, the judgment of sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing. The sentencing judge is instructed to file a statement of reasons for the sentence imposed. *Commonwealth v. Riggins,*474 Pa. 115, 377 A.2d 140 (1977); *Commonwealth v. Martin,*466 Pa. 118, 351 A.2d 650 (1976); *Commonwealth*v. *Wertz,*252 Pa.Super. 584, 384 A.2d 933 (1978).

PRICE and VAN der VOORT, JJ., dissented and would affirm.
Pre-Hearing Information Session

Federal Milk Marketing Order Pricing Provisions

Overview

 USDA will hold a virtual Pre-hearing Information Session on Friday June 16, 2023, beginning at 

10:00 a.m. ET.

 The session will give stakeholders submitting proposals an opportunity to explain how their 

proposal(s) would be implemented and operate. 

Information Session Details

 The Information Session is optional. Stakeholders who submitted a proposal(s) are strongly 

encouraged to participate.

 The purpose of the session is not for stakeholders to provide the justification for or impact of their

proposal(s).

 Only USDA staff will have the ability to ask technical operational questions of stakeholders regarding 

their proposal. 

 USDA welcomes stakeholders to provide initial descriptions of likely data requests so USDA can 

begin evaluating collection and potential release of relevant data if a formal rulemaking proceeding 

is initiated.

Logistics

 Each stakeholder submission may have one representative participate per individual proposal. 

If a submission contains multiple proposals, the representative will have equal amounts of time for 

each individual proposal. 

 Each representative will have 15 minutes to discuss their proposal, followed by questions from USDA 

staff. 

 The session will proceed by stakeholder, not by subject area. 

 Stakeholders presenting proposals will receive detailed participation instructions via email on 

June 15, 2023. 

 A link for interested parties to virtually observe the session will be posted at 

https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/dairy by 9:00 a.m. (ET) the day of the workshop. 

Additional Information

 Following the Pre-hearing Information Session, proponents have until Tuesday, June 20, 2023, at 

5:00 p.m. ET to submit modified proposals.
[On Letterhead of Partnering Organization]

PARTNER ORGANIZATION LETTER

[Name of Authorized Organizational Representative /Applicant]

[Applicant Organization]

[City, State]

Dear [Project Director]:

[Optional short introduction describing partnering organization’s mission and how its applicable to the proposed project.]

We commit to participating in and supporting the [Current Year] [Project Title], for the period of [include dates of commitment within proposed project period] in the following way(s):

· Person 1 will ... (describe role: what the person will do, time commitment)

· Person 2 will ... (describe role: what the person will do, time commitment)

The individuals and our organization agree to abide by the management plan contained in the application. 

Sincerely,

[Signature of Partnering Organization’s Authorized Representative (AR)]

Printed Name of AR 

AR’s Title (e.g., Executive Director)

Address and telephone number if that information is not already on the letterhead
Tøbte 7b1'

Percentøge of Mìlk from CountÍes with Three or More Poylng Hondlers

December 2008

State I State Code I Percentage

AR

AZ

CT

DE

GA

IA

ID

IL

IN

KS

KY

LA

MA

MD

ME

MI

MN

MO

MS

NC

NE

NH

NJ

NM

NY

OH

OK

OR

PA

sc

SD

TN

TX

VA

VT

WA

WI

WV

Prepared by:

Ma rket Adm inistrator's Office

Minneapolis, Minnesota

November2009

5

4

9

10

13

t9

1.6

t7

18

20

2t

22

25

24

23

26

27

29

28

37

31

33

34

35

36

39

40

4t

42

45

46

47

48

51

50

53

55

54

:

36.b4%

80.170/o

58.t9To

9L.60%

30.9s%

81.77%

t9.s9%

4t.99Yo

6L.A3o/o

3t.38%

58.19/o

69.7Ûo/o

74.89o/o

94.99/o

94.59%

95.28%

96.9tYo

78.33Yo

6.SLo/o

73.560/o

23.57o/o

7!.O2o/o

90.72%

40.o7%

98.7t%

84.980/o

45.L6o/o

6L.7to/o

99.44o/o

L9.47o/o

33.52%

76.68%o

62.46To

79.49%

98.02Yo

34.29%

99.95/o

6t.87%

1. For each state, the total milk pooled on Federal orders, from counties meeting the criteria divided by total milk

pooled on Federalorders. 1
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE VI

JUSTICE

JUSTICE

Article 50

Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence

No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again in criminal proceedings for an offence for which he or she has already been finally acquitted or convicted within the Union in accordance with the law.

---