27190 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

statement containing the information 

required by the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not 

required. 

E. Takings (E.O. 12630) 

Under the criteria in Executive Order 

12630, this rule does not affect 

individual property rights protected by 

the Fifth Amendment nor does it 

involve a compensable ‘‘taking.’’ A 

takings implication assessment is 

therefore not required. 

F. Federalism (E.O. 13132) 

Under the criteria in Executive Order 

13132, this rule has no substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. This rule 

ensures notification to State and local 

governments of a BIA official’s decision 

to take land into trust and the right to 

administratively appeal such decision. 

This rule also ensures notification to 

State and local governments of an AS– 

IA official’s decision through 

publication in the Federal Register. 

G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988) 

This rule complies with the 

requirements of Executive Order 12988. 

Specifically, this rule has been reviewed 

to eliminate errors and ambiguity and 

written to minimize litigation; and is 

written in clear language and contains 

clear legal standards. 

H. Consultation With Indian Tribes 

(E.O. 13175) 

In accordance with the President’s 

memorandum of April 29, 1994, 

‘‘Government-to-Government Relations 

with Native American Tribal 

Governments,’’ Executive Order 13175 

(59 FR 22951, November 6, 2000), and 

512 DM 2, we have determined there are 

no potential effects on federally 

recognized Indian tribes and Indian 

trust assets. 

I. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This rule does not contain any 

information collections requiring 

approval under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et 

seq. 

J. National Environmental Policy Act 

This rule does not constitute a major 

Federal action significantly affecting the 

quality of the human environment 

because it is of an administrative, 

technical, and procedural nature. 

K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 

13211) 

This rule is not a significant energy 

action under the definition in Executive 

Order 13211. A Statement of Energy 

Effects is not required. 

L. Determination To Issue Final Rule 

Without the Opportunity for Public 

Comment and With Immediate Effective 

Date 

BIA is taking this action under its 

authority, at 5 U.S.C. 552, to publish 

regulations in the Federal Register. 

Under the Administrative Procedure 

Act, statutory procedures for agency 

rulemaking do not apply ‘‘when the 

agency for good cause finds . . . that 

notice and public procedure thereon are 

impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest.’’ 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(3)(B). BIA finds that the notice 

and comment procedure are 

impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest, because: (1) These 

amendments are non-substantive; and 

(2) the public benefits for timely 

notification of a change in the official 

agency address, and further delay is 

unnecessary and contrary to the public 

interest. Similarly because this final rule 

makes no substantive changes and 

merely reflects a change of address and 

updates to titles in the existing 

regulations, this final rule is not subject 

to the effective date limitation of 5 

U.S.C. 553(d). 

List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 23 

Administrative practice and 

procedures, Child welfare, Grant 

programs—Indians, Grant programs— 

social programs, Indians, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the Department of the 

Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 

amends part 23 in Title 25 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations as follows: 

PART 23—INDIAN CHILD WELFARE 

ACT 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 23 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2, 9, 

1901–1952. 

■ 2. Throughout part 23, remove the 

word ‘‘Area Director’’ and ‘‘Area 

Directors’’ and add in their place the 

words ‘‘Regional Director’’ and 

‘‘Regional Directors’’ respectively, 

wherever they appear. 

■ 3. In § 23.11, revise paragraph (c)(1) to 

read as follows: 

§ 23.11 Notice. 

* * * * * 

(c)(1) For proceedings in Alabama, 

Connecticut, Delaware, District of 

Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, 

Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, 

Massachusetts, Mississippi, New 

Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, 

North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode 

Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, 

Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, or any 

territory or possession of the United 

States, notices shall be sent to the 

following address: Eastern Regional 

Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 545 

Marriott Drive, Suite 700, Nashville, 

Tennessee 37214. 

* * * * * 

Dated: May 1, 2014. 

Kevin K. Washburn, 

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2014–10934 Filed 5–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0168; FRL–9756–5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Utah; 

Revisions to UAC Rule 401—Permit: 

New and Modified Sources 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve State Implementation Plan 

revisions submitted by the State of Utah 

on April 17, 2008 and partially approve 

SIP revisions submitted by the State of 

Utah on September 15, 2006. The 

revisions contain new rules in Utah’s 

Title 307 Rule 401 (Permit: New and 

Modified Sources). The intended effect 

of this action is to propose to approve 

the rules that are consistent with the 

Clean Air Act. This action is being taken 

under sections 110 and 112 of the Clean 

Air Act. 

DATES: This final rule is effective June 

12, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0168. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 27191 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Program, Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 

1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 

80202–1129. EPA requests you contact 

the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to view 

the hard copy of the docket. You may 

view the hard copy of the docket 

Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 

4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kevin Leone, Air Program, Mailcode 

8P–AR, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop 

Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, 

(303) 312–6227, or leone.kevin@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. What action is EPA taking? 

A. Summary of Final Action 

II. Background 

III. What Are the Grounds for this Approval 

Action 

IV. Summary of Final Action 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

Definitions 

For the purpose of this document, we 

are giving meaning to certain words or 

initials as follows: 

(i) The words or initials Act or CAA 

mean or refer to the Clean Air Act, 

unless the context indicates otherwise. 

(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our 

mean or refer to the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency. 

(iii) The initials HAP mean or refer to 

Hazardous Air Pollutant. 

(iv) The initials MACT mean or refer 

to Maximum Achievable Control 

Technology. 

(v) The initials NAAQS mean or refer 

to National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards. 

(vi) The initials NSR mean or refer to 

New Source Review. 

(vii) The initials SIP mean or refer to 

State Implementation Plan. 

(viii) The words State or Utah mean 

the State of Utah, unless the context 

indicates otherwise. 

(ix) The initials UAC mean or refer to 

the Utah Administrative Code. 

I. What action is EPA taking? 

A. Summary of Final Action 

We are taking final action to approve 

the renumbering of R307–413–7 to 

R307–401–14 (Used Oil Fuel Burned for 

Energy Recovery) as submitted by the 

State of Utah on September 15, 2006; 

changes to the definition of ‘‘Boiler’’ in 

R307–401–14(1), as submitted by the 

State of Utah on April 17, 2008; and 

conditionally approve R307–401–15 and 

approve R307–401–16 as submitted on 

September 15, 2006. 

EPA proposed an action for the above 

SIP revision submittals on June 25, 

2012, (77 FR 37859.) We accepted 

comments from the public on this 

proposal from June 26, 2012, until July 

25, 2012. EPA received no comments 

during the public comment period. In 

the proposed rule, we described our 

basis for the actions identified above. 

The reader should refer to the proposed 

rule, and sections III and IV of this 

preamble, for additional information 

regarding this final action. 

EPA reviews a SIP revision 

submission for its compliance with the 

Act and EPA regulations. We evaluated 

the submitted SIP revisions for Utah’s 

minor NSR regulations based upon the 

regulations and associated record that 

have been submitted and are currently 

before EPA. In order for EPA to ensure 

that Utah has regulations that meet the 

requirements of the CAA, the State must 

demonstrate the regulations are as 

stringent as the Act and the 

implementing regulations discussed in 

this notice. For example, EPA must have 

sufficient information to make a finding 

that the new regulations will ensure 

protection of the NAAQS, and 

noninterference with the Utah SIP 

control strategies, as required by section 

110(l) of the Act. 

II. Background 

On September 20, 1999, the State of 

Utah submitted a renumbering and 

recodification of its Utah Administrative 

Code (UAC) rules within the Utah SIP. 

EPA took final action to approve 

portions of this submittal on February 

14, 2006 (71 FR 7670). In that action 

EPA approved the recodification of 

R307–413–7 (Exemption from Notice of 

Intent Requirements for Used Oil 

Burned for Energy Recovery, previously 

found under R307–7–2 and 3). On 

September 15, 2006, the State of Utah 

again submitted a renumbering and 

recodification of its UAC rules within 

the Utah SIP which renumbered R307– 

413–7 to R307–401–14 (Used Oil Fuel 

Burned for Energy Recovery). We are 

taking final action to approve this 

renumbering in this action. 

On April 17, 2008, the State of Utah 

submitted a revision to R307–401–14 

which changed the definition of 

‘‘Boiler.’’ We are taking final action to 

approve this definition change in this 

action. 

On October 1, 1990, R307–6 (De 

minimis Emissions from Air Strippers 

and Soil Venting Projects) was approved 

into the Utah SIP. On August 14, 1998, 

EPA approved revisions to R307–6 (63 

FR 43624). On January 8, 1999, Utah 

submitted substantive revisions to 

R307–6, which also renumbered R307– 

6 to R307–413–8 and R307–413–9. EPA 

did not act on this submittal. On 

September 15, 2006, Utah submitted 

revisions which moved R307–413–8 and 

R307–413–9 to R307–401–15 (Air 

Strippers and Soil Venting Projects) and 

R307–401–16 (De minimis Emissions 

from Soil Aeration Projects). Utah’s 

January 8, 1999, submittal is superceded 

by the September 15, 2006, submittal. 

EPA is taking final action to 

conditionally approve R307–401–15 and 

approve R307–401–16 as submitted on 

September 15, 2006, in this action. 

All other portions of the September 

15, 2006, submittal not addressed in this 

action will be addressed at a later date. 

III. What Are the Grounds for This 

Approval Action 

In this final rulemaking, we are taking 

final action to approve the renumbering 

of R307–413–7 to R307–401–14 (Used 

Oil Fuel Burned for Energy Recovery) as 

submitted by the State of Utah on 

September 15, 2006, because this 

provision had been previously approved 

into the Utah SIP (71 FR 7670) and the 

revision does not contain substantive 

changes to the rule. We are also 

clarifying that R307–401–14(3) refers to 

the owner or operator of a boiler as 

described in R307–401–14(1). 

We are taking final action to approve 

changes to the definition of ‘‘Boiler’’ in 

R307–401–14(1) as submitted by the 

State of Utah on April 17, 2008, in this 

action. The current federally approved 

definition of ‘‘Boiler’’ in R307–413–7 

references Utah’s solid and hazardous 

waste definition of ‘‘Boiler’’ in R315–1– 

1 as it was defined in 40 CFR 260.10, 

as amended on July 1, 2002. Utah’s 

current federally approved version of 

R315–1–1 incorporates by reference 40 

CFR 260.10, as amended on July 1, 

2008. Since there is no substantive 

difference between 40 CFR 260.10, as 

amended on July 1, 2002, and 40 CFR 

260.10, as amended on July 1, 2008, we 

are taking final action to approve this 

definition change in R307–401–14. 

We are taking final action to 

conditionally approve R307–401–15 and 

approve R307–401–16 as submitted on 

September 15, 2006, in this action. CAA 

110(k)(4) states ‘‘The administrator may 

approve a plan revision based on a 

commitment of the State to adopt 

specific enforceable measures by a date 

certain, but not later than 1 year after 

the date of approval of the plan revision. 

Any such conditional approval shall be 

treated as a disapproval if the state fails 

to comply with such commitment’’. 

We are taking final action to 

conditionally approve R307–401–15 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

27192 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

because R307–401–15(3) allows for a 

‘‘test or monitoring method approved by 

the executive secretary,’’ which is 

director’s discretion. Utah submitted a 

letter to EPA on February 24, 2012, 

committing to revise R307–401–15(3) to 

remove the executive secretary’s 

discretion to approve alternate test or 

monitoring methods (see docket). Utah 

must submit a SIP revision to change or 

remove this language not later than one 

year after the date of final publication of 

on this rulemaking. If, however, Utah 

does not submit such a revision within 

this timeframe, EPA’s conditional 

approval of R307–401–15(3) will revert 

to a disapproval. 

R307–401–15 and R307–401–16 

allows all air stripper, soil venting and 

soil aeration projects to be exempt from 

notice of intent and approval order 

requirements if the estimated actual air 

emissions from volatile organic 

compounds from a given project are less 

than 5 tons per year (R307–401–9(1)(a)) 

and the level of any one hazardous air 

pollutant (HAP) or combination of HAPs 

are less than the levels listed in R307– 

410–4(1)(d) (Toxic Screening Levels and 

Averaging Periods). EPA has approved 

similar de minimis thresholds for 

criteria pollutants in past rulemakings: 

The State of Idaho’s permit to construct 

regulations, which were approved final 

on January 16, 2003 (68 FR 2217); and 

the State of Montana’s exclusion for de 

minimis changes, which were approved 

final on February 13, 2012 (77 FR 7531). 

R307–401–15 and R307–401–16 contain 

provisions which are smaller in nature 

and scope than the previously approved 

rulemakings, as they generally only 

apply to the remediation of 

underground storage tanks. EPA finds 

the revisions would not interfere with 

any applicable requirement concerning 

attainment of the NAAQS, rate of 

progress and reasonable further progress 

(as defined in section 171), or any other 

applicable requirement of this Act. 

A review of air stripper, soil venting 

and soil aeration projects from 2008— 

2010 which were exempted from notice 

of intent and approval order 

requirements under R307–401–15 and 

R307–401–16 show negligible criteria 

pollutant emissions (see docket). In 

addition, data from the Utah leaking 

underground storage tank program 

shows a significant decrease in the 

number of new cleanups initiated over 

the last 10 years (see docket). These 

provisions meet the requirements of 40 

CFR 51.160 because they require prior 

written approval (R307–401–15(2), 

R307–401–16(1)) of the State and have 

testing requirements (R307–401–15(3)) 

to ensure that exempted projects do not 

exceed the de minimis thresholds as 

described in R307–401–9. 

IV. Summary of Final Action 

Based on the above discussion, EPA 

finds that the revisions are consistent 

with all CAA requirements. We are 

taking final action to approve the 

renumbering of R307–413–7 to R307– 

401–14 (Used Oil Fuel Burned for 

Energy Recovery) as submitted by the 

State of Utah on September 15, 2006; 

changes to the definition of ‘‘Boiler’’ in 

R307–401–14(1), as submitted by the 

State of Utah on April 17, 2008; and 

conditionally approve R307–401–15 and 

approve R307–401–16 as submitted on 

September 15, 2006. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this proposed action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In 

addition, this rule does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), because the SIP is not approved 

to apply in Indian country located in the 

State, and EPA notes that it will not 

impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by July 14, 2014. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 27193 

1Although EPA received Georgia’s request to 

redesignate the Macon Area to attainment for the 

1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS on June 26, 2012, along 

with the maintenance plan SIP submission, the 

official submittal date for the redesignation request 

and maintenance plan is the date of the cover letter, 

June 21, 2012. 

2EPA designated the Macon Area as 

nonattainment for the annual 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS 

on January 5, 2005 (70 FR 944) as supplemented on 

April 14, 2005 (70 FR 19844). 

3On March 2, 2012, EPA approved, under section 

172(c)(3) of the CAA, Georgia’s 2002 base-year 

emissions inventory for the Macon Area as part of 

the SIP revision submitted by GA EPD to provide 

for attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in the 

Area. See 77 FR 12724. 

Dated: October 19, 2012 

James B. Martin, 

Regional Administrator Region 8. Original 

signature affirmed by: 

Dated: April 22, 2014. 

Shaun L. McGrath, 

Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52 APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart TT—Utah 

■ 2. Section 52.2320 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(78) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2320 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(78) On April 17, 2008 the State of 

Utah submitted revisions to the Utah 

Administrative Code (UAC) R307–401– 

14, Used Oil Fuel Burned for Energy 

Recovery. On September 15, 2006 the 

State of Utah submitted revisions to the 

UAC R307–401–15, Air Strippers and 

Soil Venting Projects, and R307–401–16, 

De minimis Emissions From Soil 

Aeration Projects. 

(i) Incorporation by Reference 

(A) Title R307 of the Utah 

Administrative Code, Environmental 

Quality, Air Quality, Rule R307–401–14, 

Used Oil Fuel Burned for Energy 

Recovery. Effective February 8, 2008; as 

published in the Utah State Bulletin on 

December 1, 2007 and March 1, 2008. 

(B) Title R307 of the Utah 

Administrative Code, Environmental 

Quality, Air Quality, R307–401–15, Air 

Strippers and Soil Venting Projects, and 

R307–401–16, De minimis Emissions 

From Soil Aeration Projects. Effective 

June 16, 2006; as published in the Utah 

State Bulletin on December 1, 2005 and 

July 15, 2006. 

[FR Doc. 2014–10823 Filed 5–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0851; FRL–9910–64- 

Region 4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans and Designation 

of Areas for Air Quality Planning 

Purposes; Georgia; Redesignation of 

the Macon, Georgia, 1997 Annual Fine 

Particulate Matter Nonattainment Area 

to Attainment 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule; correcting 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve a request submitted on June 21, 

2012, by the Georgia Department of 

Natural Resources, through Georgia 

Environmental Protection Division (GA 

EPD), to redesignate the Macon, Georgia, 

fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 

nonattainment area (hereafter referred to 

as the ‘‘Macon Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’) to 

attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5

National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). The Macon Area is 

comprised of Bibb County and a portion 

of Monroe County in Georgia. EPA’s 

approval of the redesignation request is 

based on the determination that Georgia 

has met the criteria for redesignation to 

attainment set forth in the Clean Air Act 

(CAA or Act). EPA is also approving a 

revision to the Georgia State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) to include 

the 1997 Annual PM2.5 maintenance 

plan for the Macon Area. Additionally, 

EPA is approving into the Georgia SIP 

the motor vehicle emission budgets 

(MVEBs) for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and 

PM2.5 for the year 2023 for the Macon 

Area that are included as part of 

Georgia’s maintenance plan for the 1997 

Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Furthermore, 

EPA is approving a determination that 

the Area is expected to maintain the 

1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS through the 

year 2024. EPA is also correcting an 

inadvertent error in the proposed 

rulemaking for this action. 

DATES: This rule will be effective June 

12, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2012–0851. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the www.regulations.gov 

Web site. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Regulatory Development Section, 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joydeb Majumder, Regulatory 

Development Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Joydeb 

Majumder may be reached by phone at 

(404) 562–9121 or via electronic mail at 

majumder.joydeb@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. What is the background for the 

actions? 

On June 21, 2012,1 the Georgia 

Department of Natural Resources, 

through GA EPD, submitted a request to 

EPA for redesignation of the Macon 

Area to attainment for the 1997 Annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS, and for approval of a 

Georgia SIP revision containing a 

maintenance plan for the Area.2 On 

February 5, 2014, EPA proposed to 

redesignate the Macon Area to 

attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5

NAAQS, and to approve, as a revision 

to the Georgia SIP, the State’s 1997 

Annual PM2.5 NAAQS maintenance 

plan and the MVEBs for direct PM2.5

and NOX for the Macon Area included 

in that maintenance plan.3 See 79 FR 

6842. EPA also proposed to determine 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES