alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Mortgage Acceptance Company
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Donald
J. Meyer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert L. Levy, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 
 (1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 
 (2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 By:
            
            /s/
      Donald J. Meyer
            
            By:
            
            /s/
      Robert L. LevyDonald
      J. Meyer
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              August
      7, 2008
            
            
            
            Robert
      L. Levy
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              August
      7, 2008
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT NO. 23(a)

                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
33-33520  on  Form  S-8,  Registration   Statement  No.  33-5134  on  Form  S-3,
Post-Effective  Amendment No. 1 to  Registration  Statement No. 33-38349 on Form
S-3, Registration  Statement No. 33-50597 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement
No. 33-57835 on Form S-3 of Carolina Power & Light Company,  of our report dated
February 9, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Carolina Power
& Light Company for the year ended December 31, 1997.









/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
---------------------------
Raleigh, North Carolina
March 26, 1998
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officers of Barra, Inc. (the "Company") each hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 12, 2004



| |     |                    
| | --- | -------------------
| | By: | /s/ Kamal Duggirala

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Kamal Duggirala        
| | Chief Executive Officer



Dated: February 12, 2004



| |     |                  
| | --- | -----------------
| | By: | /s/ Greg Stockett

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Greg Stockett          
| | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, and is
not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

****
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XIX

RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SPACE

RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SPACE

Article 179

(ex Article 163 TEC)

(ex Article 163 TEC)

1.   The Union shall have the objective of strengthening its scientific and technological bases by achieving a European research area in which researchers, scientific knowledge and technology circulate freely, and encouraging it to become more competitive, including in its industry, while promoting all the research activities deemed necessary by virtue of other Chapters of the Treaties.

2.   For this purpose the Union shall, throughout the Union, encourage undertakings, including small and medium-sized undertakings, research centres and universities in their research and technological development activities of high quality; it shall support their efforts to cooperate with one another, aiming, notably, at permitting researchers to cooperate freely across borders and at enabling undertakings to exploit the internal market potential to the full, in particular through the opening-up of national public contracts, the definition of common standards and the removal of legal and fiscal obstacles to that cooperation.

3.   All Union activities under the Treaties in the area of research and technological development, including demonstration projects, shall be decided on and implemented in accordance with the provisions of this Title.

---
HOLLY JULIAN,

Appellant,

v.

BAY COUNTY DISTRICT 

SCHOOL BOARD,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0597

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 15, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Michael C. Overstreet, Judge.

Cecile M. Scoon, Panama City, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s responses to the Court’s orders of February 

26, 2015, and March 13, 2015, the Court has determined that the appeal is 

premature. C.f. Hickox v. Taylor, 933 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice to seek review upon entry 

of a final order. 

WOLF and RAY, JJ., CONCUR. BENTON, J., DISSENTS WITH OPINION. 
BENTON, J., dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. As to the December 11, 2014, judgment, in my view, 

the appeal should be allowed to proceed as an appeal from a partial, final 

judgment. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k). The order of January 8, 2015, denied 

rehearing as to the December 11, 2014, judgment insofar as it dismissed both 

counts one and two, the only counts addressed in the judgment.

2
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

5.   Declaration on the political agreement by the European Council concerning the draft Decision on the composition of the European Parliament

Declaration on the political agreement by the European Council concerning the draft Decision on the composition of the European Parliament

The European Council will give its political agreement on the revised draft Decision on the composition of the European Parliament for the legislative period 2009-2014, based on the proposal from the European Parliament.

---
April 7, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

D. PATRICK SMITHERMAN, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00550-CV V.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Bank of 

America, N.A., signed March 5, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. 

We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the 

judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, D. Patrick Smitherman, to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7419

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

ZANTWAN DEVORRIS WORTHY, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (1:07-cr-00127-NCT-1) 

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 24, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Zantwan Devorris Worthy, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Zantwan Devorris Worthy appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Worthy, No. 1:07-cr-00127-NCT-1 

(M.D.N.C. July 20, 2009). Further, we deny Worthy’s motion to 

consolidate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1439

ERICK DANILO MARTINEZ GONZALEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: September 30, 2021 Decided: November 4, 2021

Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jay S. Marks, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for 

Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anthony P. Nicastro, 

Assistant Director, Matthew B. George, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration 

Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Erick Danilo Martinez Gonzalez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal 

from the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying Gonzalez’s applications for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

We deny the petition for review.

We have reviewed the administrative record, including the transcript of the merits 

hearing and all supporting evidence, and considered the arguments pressed on appeal in 

conjunction with the record and the relevant authorities. We first conclude that the record 

evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 

U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the IJ’s dispositive ruling, 

affirmed by the Board, that Gonzalez failed to show the requisite nexus to a protected 

ground. See Cortez-Mendez v. Whitaker, 912 F.3d 205, 209 (4th Cir. 2019) (“Whether a 

person’s persecution shares a nexus with his alleged protected ground is a question of fact 

entitled to deference and reviewed for clear error.”).

With regard to the denial of Gonzalez’s claim for CAT relief, we conclude that: (1) 

substantial evidence supports the relevant factual findings, see Nasrallah v. Barr, 140 S. 

Ct. 1683, 1692 (2020); and (2) the agency committed no legal error in its adjudication of

Gonzalez’s CAT claim. Lastly, we conclude that the Board did not err in determining that 

the IJ’s decision did not need to be vacated because the IJ listed the incorrect charge of 

removability on the first page of the decision. 
3

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

See In re Gonzalez (B.I.A. Mar. 22, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 12.1


                      Boston Edison Company
        Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
              Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2001
                         (in thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>								   <C>
Net income from continuing operations               $ 150,353
Income taxes                                           93,967
Fixed charges (including securitization               117,969
certificates)
   Total                                            $ 362,289
                                                     ========
Interest expense                                     $ 98,936
Interest component of rentals                          19,033
   Total                                            $ 117,969
                                                     ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                       3.07
                                                         ====
</TABLE>



                                                     Exhibit 12.2


                      Boston Edison Company
        Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
            and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements
              Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2001
                         (in thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>								<C>

Net income from continuing operations            $ 150,353
Income taxes                                        93,967
Fixed charges (including securitization            117,969
certificates)
   Total                                         $ 362,289
                                                  ========
Interest expense                                  $ 98,936
Interest component of rentals                       19,033
   Subtotal                                      $ 117,969
                                                  ========
Preferred stock dividend requirements                9,144
   Total                                         $ 127,113
                                                  ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                    2.85
                                                      ====
</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1274 

To repeal Public Law 107–40. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Ms. LEE of California (for herself, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. 

MCCOLLUM, Mr. WELCH, Ms. MOORE, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. 

NORTON, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. CLARKE of New York, 

Mr. MASSIE, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. RUSH, Mr. 

HIMES, Ms. OMAR, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. TONKO, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. 

RASKIN, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. POCAN, Mr. MCGOVERN, 

Ms. ESHOO, Mr. ROSE of New York, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. COHEN, Mr. 

AMASH, Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Ms. TLAIB, 

Ms. BONAMICI, Ms. PRESSLEY, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. 

DESAULNIER, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. NADLER, Mr. LEWIS, Mr. KHANNA, 

Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. PINGREE, Ms. WATERS, and Mr. 

SCHRADER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal Public Law 107–40. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repeal of the Author5 ization for Use of Military Force’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1274 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDING. 

2 Congress finds that the Authorization for Use of Mili3 tary Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), 

4 signed into law on September 18, 2001, has been used 

5 to justify a broad and open-ended authorization for the 

6 use of military force and such an interpretation is incon7 sistent with the authority of Congress to declare war and 

8 make all laws for executing powers vested by the Constitu9 tion in the Government of the United States. 

10 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF PUBLIC LAW 107–40. 

11 Effective 240 days after the date of the enactment 

12 of this Act, the Authorization for Use of Military Force 

13 (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby re14 pealed. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21





                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                    All-Comm Acquisition Corporation*             (100%)
                    All-Comm Holdings, Inc*                       (100%)
                    Alliance Media Corporation                    (100%)
                    Metro Direct, Inc.                            (100%)
                    Stephen Dunn & Associates, Inc.               (100%)
                    Media Marketplace, Inc.                       (100%)
                    Media Marketplace Media Division**            (100%)
                    Pegasus Fulfillment, Inc.                     (100%)
                    Stevens-Knox & Associates                     (100%)
                    Stevens-Knox List Brokerage                   (100%)
                    Stevens-Knox International                    (100%)
                    CMG Direct Corporation                        (100%)
                    WiredEmpire.com Corp.                         (100%)
                    Metro Fulfillment, Inc.                        (15%)


                    * Dissolved in June 1997
                    **Dissolved in August 1998
Exhibit No. 23(a)


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-33520 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-5134 on Form S-3,
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-38349 on
Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-50597 on Form S-3 and Registration
Statement No. 33-57835 on Form S-3 of Carolina Power & Light Company, of our
report dated February 10, 1997, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Carolina Power & Light Company for the year ended December 31, 1996.


\s\ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
March 26, 1997
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF INTERIM PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**


**OF
      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E.
      Eugene Sharer, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





/s/
                E. Eugene SharerE.
                Eugene SharerInterim
                Principal Financial Officer





November
      19, 2008
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08308

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 08308\08308_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08308\08308_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08308\08308_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08308\08308_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08308\08308_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08308\08308_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08308\08308_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08308\08308_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

08308\Certification Statement Plant ID 08308.pdf Plant certification statement

x 08308\Supplemental Documents\08308_Miami Fort A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08308\Supplemental Documents\08308_Miami Fort A5-3 and D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08308\Supplemental Documents\08308_Miami Fort D5-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code





In connection with the Quarterly Report of OHA Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven T. Wayne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:November 14, 2018/s/ Steven T. WayneSteven T. WaynePresident and Chief Executive Officer