alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00075-CV 

JARRETT TODD CRAWFORD APPELLANT

V.

LOYD WAYNE CRAWFORD APPELLEE 

------------

FROM THE 360TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 360-569889-15

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On March 10, 2015, and March 24, 2015, we notified appellant in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this 

appeal unless the $195 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). 

Appellant has not paid the $195 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of 

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 16, 2013,

2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and SUDDERTH, J. 

DELIVERED: April 16, 2015

 2

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil 

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district 

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Aug. 16, 2013) (listing fees in courts of 

appeals).
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

April 6, 2015

Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

P.O. Box 12308

Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

Re: AliYazdchi

v. Texas

No. 14-7087

(Your No. PD-0007-13, PD-0008-13)

Dear Clerk:

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202)479-3011

RECEIVED IN GOVm OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 13 2015

AbelAcosta,Clerk

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Sincerely,

~Zh\

Scott S. Harris, Clerk
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, 0 C. 20460 

~)FI=IC[ OF 

" IR .;r JD Rt.DI <\T eJrJ 

AUG 19 2011 

Mr. Jim Hawks 

City Administrator/Utility Manager 

City of North Platte 

211 West Third Street 

North Platte, Nebraska 69101 

Dear City Administrator Hawks: 

Thank you for your August 1, 2011, letter to Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency providing comments on the proposed "National Emission Standards for Hazardous 

Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from Coal- and Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and 

Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and 

Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units" (the Mercury and Air Toxics 

Standards rule, MATS), which was published in the Federal Register on May 3, 2011. The 

Administrator asked that I respond to your letter. 

I appreciate the issues and concerns you raise in your letter. The comment period for the proposed rule 

closed on August 4,2011. We will add your comments to the docket for this rulemaking (EPA-HQOAR-2009-0234). Responding to comments submitted during the comment period is an important part 

of the rulemaking process; we have received more than 800,000 comments about this proposal. 

Again, thank you for your letter. I appreciate the opportunity to be of service and trust the information 

provided is helpful. 

Sincerely, 

Ina McCarthy 

Assistant Administrator 

Internet Address (URL) • http IIwww epa gov 


Recycled/Recyclable ' Pnnted with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlonne Flee Recyc:ed Paper
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

2:15 p.m. on Thursday, November 30, 2023.

# PLACE:

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims;

Matters related to litigation; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: November 17, 2023. 

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-25864 Filed 11-17-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

B.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROTOCOLS ANNEXED TO THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROTOCOLS ANNEXED TO THE TREATIES

47.   Declaration on Article 5(3), (4) and (5) of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union

Declaration on Article 5(3), (4) and (5) of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis

The Conference notes that the conditions to be determined in the decision referred to in paragraphs 3, 4 or 5 of Article 5 of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union may determine that the Member State concerned shall bear the direct financial consequences, if any, necessarily and unavoidably incurred as a result of the cessation of its participation in some or all of the acquis referred to in any decision taken by the Council pursuant to Article 4 of the said Protocol.

acquis

acquis

---
Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Capital Trust on Form S-8 (File No. 333-39743) of our report dated February 14,
1997 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Capital Trust
(f/k/a California Real Estate Investment Trust and Subsidiary), as of December
31, 1996 and for the two years in the period ended December 31, 1996 which
report is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                             /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

San Francisco, California
February 25, 1998
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harpreet S. Sangha, the Chief Executive Officer of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. (the "Company"), and Sylvia Tang, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | "Harpreet S. Sangha"Harpreet S. SanghaPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and a director 
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date:  October 20, 2008
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | "Sylvia Tang"Sylvia TangChief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date:  October 20, 2008                                                              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
Exhibit 99.1

Exhibit 99.1 Certification Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by  Robert C. Warren, Jr., Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Cascade Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert C. Warren, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ROBERT C. WARREN, JR.

---

Robert C. Warren, Jr. President and Chief Executive OfficerApril 21, 2003

---

QuickLinks
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00218-CV

In re Carmen Chase Hunter

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the district clerk

has not provided her with a supplemental record that she requested only nine days ago. Having

reviewed the petition and record provided, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex.

Gov’t Code § 22.221; Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland

Filed: April 15, 2015
EXHIBIT 10(b)  


 Consent of Independent Accountants  


        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Illini Corporation relating to the issuance of
securities in the proposed merger of Illinois Community Bancorp, Inc. into Effingham Merger Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Illini Corporation, of our report, dated March 2,
2002, on the consolidated financial statements of Illini Corporation as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for the years then ended. We also consent to the reference to our firm appearing under
the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus. 




BKD, LLP

May 3, 2002

 


Decatur,
Illinois 


109
# C_2016202EN.01009001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/90

---

Article 104

(ex Article 84 TEC)

(ex Article 84 TEC)

Until the entry into force of the provisions adopted in pursuance of Article 103, the authorities in Member States shall rule on the admissibility of agreements, decisions and concerted practices and on abuse of a dominant position in the internal market in accordance with the law of their country and with the provisions of Article 101, in particular paragraph 3, and of Article 102.

---
Exhibit 32.1***Certificationpursuant to******18 U.S.C. Section 1350,******as adopted pursuant to******Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***     I, Courtney C. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. (the“Company”), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify asfollows:     (i) The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and     (ii) The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     INWITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 9th day of May 2006.       /s/ Courtney C. Smith     Courtney C. Smith    Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SpecialtyUnderwriters’ Alliance, Inc. and will be retained by Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<Page>

EXHIBIT 10.8

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3

                             DAW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                             1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN

         THE DAW TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN (THE "PLAN") IS
HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:

         SECTION 1.2 (b)(vi) OF THE PLAN IS AMENDED AND RESTATED TO READ IN ITS
ENTIRETY AS FOLLOWS:

                  (vi) to accelerate or extend the exercisability or extend the
                  term of any or all such outstanding Options within the maximum
                  ten-year term of Options under Section 1.6; and

         SECTION 1.6 OF THE PLAN IS AMENDED AND RESTATED TO READ IN ITS ENTIRETY
AS FOLLOWS:

                  1.6  Term of Options

                  Each Option and all executory rights or obligations under the
                  related Option Agreement shall expire on such date as shall be
                  determined by the Committee, but not later than ten (10) years
                  after the Grant Date.

         SECTION 3.9 OF THE PLAN IS AMENDED AND RESTATED TO READ IN ITS ENTIRETY
AS FOLLOWS:

                  3.9  Term of the Plan

                  No Option shall be granted more than ten (10) years after the
                  effective date of this Plan (the termination date"). Unless
                  otherwise expressly provided in this Plan or in an applicable
                  Option Agreement, any Option theretofore granted may extend
                  beyond such date, and all authority of the Committee with
                  respect to Options hereunder shall continue during any
                  suspension of this Plan and in respect of outstanding Options
                  on such termination date.


                                      S-2
# C_2016202EN.01008401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/84 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/84

---

Article 88

(ex Article 30 TEU)

(ex Article 30 TEU)

1.   Europol's mission shall be to support and strengthen action by the Member States' police authorities and other law enforcement services and their mutual cooperation in preventing and combating serious crime affecting two or more Member States, terrorism and forms of crime which affect a common interest covered by a Union policy.

2.   The European Parliament and the Council, by means of regulations adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall determine Europol's structure, operation, field of action and tasks. These tasks may include:

| (a) | the collection, storage, processing, analysis and exchange of information, in particular that forwarded by the authorities of the Member States or third countries or bodies; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the collection, storage, processing, analysis and exchange of information, in particular that forwarded by the authorities of the Member States or third countries or bodies;

| (b) | the coordination, organisation and implementation of investigative and operational action carried out jointly with the Member States' competent authorities or in the context of joint investigative teams, where appropriate in liaison with Eurojust. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the coordination, organisation and implementation of investigative and operational action carried out jointly with the Member States' competent authorities or in the context of joint investigative teams, where appropriate in liaison with Eurojust.

These regulations shall also lay down the procedures for scrutiny of Europol's activities by the European Parliament, together with national Parliaments.

3.   Any operational action by Europol must be carried out in liaison and in agreement with the authorities of the Member State or States whose territory is concerned. The application of coercive measures shall be the exclusive responsibility of the competent national authorities.

---
#### In the Matter of Anthony Cusimano et al., Appellants, v Nassau County Civil Service Commission et al., Respondents.

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations of the respondent Nassau County Civil Service Commission, both dated March 4, 1988, which found that the petitioners were not qualified to take the open competitive examination for the civil service position of "Director of Construction Services”, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated March 31, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the determinations are annulled, and the petitions are granted to the extent of directing the respondent Nassau County Civil Service Commission to grade the petitioners’ examinations, and if they obtain passing grades, to add their names to any civil service eligible lists for "Director of Construction Services” which have been promulgated subsequent to the subject examination.

In January 1988 the Nassau County Civil Service Commission issued an announcement for an open competitive examination regarding the title of "Director of Construction Services”. A section thereof, entitled "minimum qualifications”, listed several qualifications, including: "Eleven years of satisfactory experience managing the construction of various building facilities, including five years as construction manager of complex, major facilities costing $20,000,000 or more”.

*618In rejecting the petitioners’ applications to take the examination, the Commission was of the view that the petitioner Snow "faile[d] to show the required 5 years experience as the construction manager of $20 million or more construction projects”, and that the petitioner Cusimano’s "[e]xperience as Architect not acceptable as construction manager”.

However, a review of the evidence in the record, including the sworn affidavit of Walter Strauss, an assistant to the Commissioner for Capital Programs in the Nassau County Department of Public Works, indicates that the petitioners had the necessary qualifications to take the examination, and that other applicants with similar backgrounds had been found qualified by the Commission to take the examination. In opposition to this probative material, the Commission merely submitted a concededly "undated, unsworn affidavit” from a "Personnel Specialist” employed by the Commission. Under these circumstances, the Commission’s determinations must be considered "so irrational and arbitrary as to warrant intervention” *(Matter of Kirchgessner v Hurlbut,*81 AD2d 958, 959).

We note that the petitioners were permitted to take the subject examination pursuant to the provisions of an order to show cause dated March 17, 1988. Accordingly, the Commission is directed to grade the petitioners’ examinations and, if they obtain passing grades, to add their names to any civil service eligible lists for "Director of Construction Services” which have been promulgated subsequent to the subject examination. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.8



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to use of our report dated March 22, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, included in an exhibit to the Annual Report (Form 40-F) for 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 033-63210 and 333-67933) pertaining to the Stock Option Plans of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. of our report dated March 22, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 included in the Annual Report (Form 40-F) for the year ended December 31, 2005.









Ernst & Young LLP

Calgary, Canada

Ernst & Young LLP

March 26, 2006

Chartered Accountants
ONClivtit

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN RE THE PETITION OF

SHARON M. ANDERSON

PR 21-0004 EZLED

APR 1 3 2021

Bowen GreenwooO

Clerk of Suprerne Court

StFitR rvf Montana

ORDER

Sharon M. Anderson has petitioned this Court for admission to active status in the

State Bar of Montana after having been on emeritus status since April 2020.

IT IS ORDERED that upon payment of the appropriate fees to the State Bar of

Montana, Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice of law in the state of Montana.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to Petitioner and to the State

Bar of Montana'

DATED this J-1, day of April, 2021.

For the Court,

By

Chief Justice

04/13/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0004