alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

 Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF PEANUTS

FOR RELEASE AT 1:30 P.M. CT November 21, 2019

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of peanuts. The peanuts were sold 

under Peanut Invitation No. 13 dated November 13, 2019.

Catalog Lot Catalog Location Purchaser Tons Sold Bid Price (per ton) CCC Revenue Peanut Type

Lot #18 7-2229 Golden Peanut & Tree Nuts 14.24 $367.50 $ 5,233.20 Virginia 

Lot #42 7-2032 Golden Peanut & Tree Nuts 162.00 $367.50 $ 59,535.00 Runner

Lot #43 7-2150 Golden Peanut & Tree Nuts 2,477.71 $367.50 $ 910,558.43 Runner

Lot #44 7-2229 Golden Peanut & Tree Nuts 478.11 $367.50 $ 175,705.43 Spanish

Lot #45 7-2229 Golden Peanut & Tree Nuts 282.74 $367.50 $ 103,906.95 Virginia

Lot #46 7-2374 Golden Grove USA, Inc 853.93 $360.00 $ 307,414.80 Virginia

Totals 4,268.73 $1,562,353.80
NUMBER 13-14-00735-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JUSTINE FRANCESCA HERNANDEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 399th District Court

of Bexar County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Counsel for appellant has filed a verified motion to nonsuit the appeal because

appellant no longer wishes to pursue the appeal.1 In a signed attachment, appellant 

 

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio pursuant 

to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 

(West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.). 
2

states that she is requesting that this Court nonsuit her appeal. We find the motion and 

attachment together meet the requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) 

that appellant and her attorney must sign a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we GRANT the 

motion and DISMISS the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). 

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

16th day of April, 2015.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27 (C)

                       NONFINANCIAL STATEMENT DISCLOSURES
                                 REGULATION S-B

                                                                                
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the Company
10-QSB for the three  months  ended  February  28, 1997 and is  qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                              49
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                       135
<INVENTORY>                                      2,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,404
<PP&E>                                           9,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,902
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           969
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,815)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,797
<SALES>                                          4,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,077
<CGS>                                            2,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    50
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                142
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       142
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
                                  

</TABLE>
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 115 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 11, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To require the Department of State to establish a policy 

regarding the use of location-tracking consumer devices 

by employees at diplomatic and consular facilities, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 115 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Diplomats 

3 from Surveillance Through Consumer Devices Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SECURING UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC AND CON5 SULAR FACILITIES AGAINST CYBERSURVEIL6 LANCE. 

7 (a) POLICY ON LOCATION-TRACKING CONSUMER DE8 VICES.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the en9 actment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall establish 

10 a policy on the use of location-tracking consumer devices, 

11 including GPS-enabled devices, at United States diplo12 matic and consular facilities by United States Government 

13 employees, contractors, locally employed staff, and mem14 bers of other agencies deployed to or stationed at such 

15 facilities. 

16 (b) SECURITY BRIEFING.—Existing and new employ17 ees at United States diplomatic and consular facilities, in18 cluding contractors, locally employed staff, and members 

19 of other agencies deployed to or stationed at such facili20 ties, shall, as a part of the security briefings provided to 

21 such employees, be informed of the policy described in sub22 section (a) and given instructions on the use of location23 tracking consumer devices both on and off the premises 

24 of such facilities. 

25 (c) COORDINATION.—The Secretary of State shall co26 ordinate with the heads of any other agencies whose emVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:56 Jan 11, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H115.RFS H115

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

HR 115 RFS

1 ployees are deployed to or stationed at United States dip2 lomatic and consular facilities in the formulation of the 

3 policy described in subsection (a) and the dissemination 

4 of such policy pursuant to subsection (b). 

5 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the for6 mulation of the policy described in subsection (a), the Sec7 retary of State shall submit to the Committee on Foreign 

8 Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Com9 mittee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the 

10 details of such policy. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 10, 

2019. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals.

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number: 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/16/2015 9:18:32 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Exhibit 32(a)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Progress Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, William D. Johnson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ William D.
Johnson


William
D. Johnson


Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer


February
26, 2008








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                                                  ZENASCENT INC.

                                January 30, 2002

         Re:  Consulting Agreement/Payment Agreement

Dear Richard:

         This letter will act as written confirmation that the Consulting
Agreement and payment Agreement between Zenascent, Inc. and Investor Relations
Services, Inc. and Summit Trading Limited (respectively) has been canceled by
the parties and that no payment is currently due and owing to either Investor
Relations Services, Inc. or Summit Trading Limited. As per our subsequent
agreement, it is contemplated that a new agreement will be entered into between
Zenascent, Inc. and Investor Relations Services, Inc. and Summit Trading
Limited; as per our recent meeting, the specifics of a proposed new agreement
will be discussed in connection with the finalization of the revised merger
agreement between Zenascent and Cedric Kushner Promotions/Cedric Kushner Boxing.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ STEVEN B. ANGEL
                                            Steven B. Angel
                                            Vice President

AGREED AND ACCEPTED

/s/ RICHARD J. FIXARIS
Richard J. Fixaris
Investor Relations Services

/s/ RICHARD J. FIXARIS
Name: ATTY-IN-FACT
Summit Trading Limited
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                                     DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                                                 5,963
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         54,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           3,146
<INVENTORY>                                                           38,914
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     104,758
<PP&E>                                                                20,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         7,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       134,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 17,748
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                              22,999
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            42,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         134,127
<SALES>                                                              100,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     109,223
<CGS>                                                                 63,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         63,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      36,975
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       2,174
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        6,756
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           4,487
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    2,269
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           363
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           2,632
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00097-CR

NO. 02-15-00098-CR

AARON JESS MARLAR APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. CR14-0355, CR14-0493

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The motion 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this 

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and SUDDERTH, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 9, 2015
National Organic Standards Board

Policy Development Committee

Proposed Recommendation

Administrative Team

July 12, 2011

Introduction and Background

The Policy and Procedures Manual (PPM) of the NOSB represents the board policies 

on committee responsibilities, board procedures, and other matters of board operational 

policy. It was noted at the Spring 2011 NOSB meeting that there is no description in the 

PPM of the Administrative Team, an informal group consisting of the Chair, Vice Chair, 

Secretary and Executive Director which has traditionally convened on a regular basis to 

coordinate the operations and logistics of the board’s work. This recommendation 

updates the PPM to add a description of this group. 

Relevant Areas in the Rule

The Organic Foods Production Act of 1990, 7 USC 6518 (a), directed the Secretary of 

Agriculture to establish the National Organic Standards Board and described its 

composition, authority and duties.

Discussion

As noted, the Administrative Team has met on a regular basis (generally weekly) as a 

forum for the Officers of the board and the Executive Director to plan, coordinate and 

administer the board’s operations. This team does not deal directly with the substance 

of the board's work but rather with the administrative and operational details of the 

NOSB's meetings and overall work. While this is not an official committee of the NOSB, 

the PDC recommends that a brief description of the Administrative Team be included in 

the PPM since this team is often referenced in board and committee meetings.

Recommendation

The PDC recommends that Section IV of the NOSB Policy and Procedures Manual be 

amended by insertion of the following description, in the section entitled “Officer 

Responsibilities,” immediately following the “Secretary” description:

Administration Team

The term “Administrative Team” describes a group consisting of the Chair, Vice 

Chair, Secretary and Executive Director. This group may meet on a weekly basis or 

as needed by teleconference or correspond by email in order to coordinate the

overall logistics and operations of the board, the officer responsibilities noted above, 

and the overall support provided to the Board by the Executive Director. 
Page 2 of 2

Administrative Team

July 12, 2011

Committee Vote

Motion: to accept the proposed amendment to the Policy and Procedures Manual 

described above.

Motion by: Joe Dickson Second: Calvin Walker

Yes: 6 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recuse: 0
AMERICAN PECAN COUNCIL

Marketing Order No. 986

Term Ends September 30

MANAGER:

Anne Warden

Phone: (817) 916-0020

awarden@americanpecan.com

CHAIRPERSON:

Larry D. Womack

Phone: (254) 893-6497

pecan@womacknursery.com

GROWERS

Region/Seat Members Alternates Term Ending

Eastern Region – Seat 1 Trent Mason

Kathleen, GA

Angie S. Ellis

Vienna, GA

2024

Eastern Region – Seat 2 Justin Jones

Leesburg, GA

Brent Steven Brinkley

Pelham, GA

2026

Eastern Region – Seat 3 Lenny Wells

Tifton, GA

Molly Willis

Albany, GA

2026

Central Region – Seat 1 Shannon F. Ivey

Tornillo, TX

Lalo Medina

Cedar Creek, TX

2024

Central Region – Seat 2 Mike Spradling

Sand Springs, OK

Randy Stephens

Cedar Creek, TX

2026

Central Region – Seat 3 Larry D. Womack

DeLeon, TX

Vacant 2024

Western Region – Seat 1 Louis J. Salopek

Fairacres, NM

Kortney Chase

San Saba, TX

2024

Western Region – Seat 2 Frank Paul Salopek

Las Cruces, NM

Deborah E. Walden-Ralls

Sahuarita, AZ

2026

Western Region – Seat 3 Philip Arnold

Fairacres, NM

John L. Heuler

Irvine, CA

2024
SHELLERS

Region/Seat Members Alternates Term Ending

Eastern Region – Seat 1 Jeff Worn

Valdosta, GA

Vacant 2024

Eastern Region – Seat 2 Alex Willson

Albany, GA

John D. Taylor

Dublin, NC

2026

Central Region – Seat 1 Steve Zaffarano

Stockton, CA

Evo Soria

Elgin, IL

2024

Central Region – Seat 2 Jared Miller

Afton, OK

Vacant 2026

Western Region – Seat 1 Vacant Vacant 2024

Western Region – Seat 2 Blake Houston

Visalia, CA

Vacant 2026

AT-LARGE MEMBERS

Type Members Alternates Term Ending

Accumulator Will Easterlin

Montezuma, GA

Mark Hamilton

Coleman, OK

2024

Public Ron Hays

Oklahoma City, OK

Dr. Steve Blizzard

Mountain Home, TX

2024
O rder filed April 25 , 2013



## In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

___________



### No. 11

- 12

- 00 292

- C R

__________

DONTAVIS GOWAN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 1805

- C2

O R D E R

On March 21, 2013, this court issued an opinion and judgment in this cause. The State

timely filed a motion for rehearing, and Appellant, Dontavis Gowan, filed a response as

requested by this court. We grant the State’s motion for rehearing, and we hereby withdraw our

opinion and judgment dated March 21, 2013.

PER CURIAM

April 25 , 2013

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J.
Exhibit 23.2


                Consent of Independent Public Accountants


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our reports included and incorporated by reference in
this Form 10-K/A, into the company's previously filed Form S-8
Registration Statements, File Numbers, 033-65256, 033-65254, 033-
65890, 333-07735, 333-46791, 333-46795, 333-46797, and 333-46809.
It should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of
the Company subsequent to April 30, 1998 or performed any audit
procedures on any financial statements of the Company subsequent to
the April 30, 1998 financial statements and subsequent to date of our
report.




ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Kansas City, Missouri,
August 4, 2000


<PAGE>
Month # of exceedances Jan 21 Feb 6 Mar 0 Apr 0 May 0 Jun 2 Jul 0 Aug 1 Sep 0 Oct 0 Nov 8 Dec 28 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul



# Ex**ceedances of the 24** 

**- hour NAAQS f** **or PM2.5 Number of da**  **ys with**  **a 24**
**- hour**  **PM2.5 measurement e xc**  **eeding 35 ug /m3 at some** 

**Ba y Area site, 2006** 
**- 2012,**  **by month**Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 

# hour NAAQS f**or PM2.5 hour**  **PM2.5 measurement e xc**  **eeding 35 ug /m3 at some** 

**2012, by month**