Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2013 / Notices 959 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

remedial orders are used in the United 

States; 

(ii) Identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the requested remedial 

orders; 

(iii) Identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 

United States which could replace the 

subject articles if they were to be 

excluded; 

(iv) Indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

exclusion order and/or a cease and 

desist order within a commercially 

reasonable time; and 

(v) Explain how the requested 

remedial orders would impact United 

States consumers. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business, eight 

calendar days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. There will be further 

opportunities for comment on the 

public interest after the issuance of any 

final initial determination in this 

investigation. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above and submit 8 true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary by 

noon the next day pursuant to section 

210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to 

the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 2929’’) 

in a prominent place on the cover page 

and/or the first page. (See Handbook for 

Electronic Filing Procedures, http:// 

www.usitc.gov/secretary/ 

fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). 

Persons with questions regarding filing 

should contact the Secretary (202–205– 

2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All nonconfidential 

written submissions will be available for 

public inspection at the Office of the 

Secretary and on EDIS. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 2, 2013. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00036 Filed 1–4–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–365–366 and 

731–TA–734–735 (Third Review)] 

Certain Pasta From Italy and Turkey; 

Notice of Commission Determination 

To Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with full 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)) to determine whether 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

orders and revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on certain 

pasta from Italy and Turkey would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule 

for the reviews will be established and 

announced at a later date. For further 

information concerning the conduct of 

these reviews and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207). 

DATED: : Effective Date: December 10, 

2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Russell Duncan (220–708–2427), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

December 10, 2012, the Commission 

determined that it should proceed to 

full reviews in the subject five-year 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Act. The Commission found that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (77 

FR 53909, September 4, 2012) was 

adequate and that the respondent 

interested party group response with 

respect to Turkey was adequate, and 

decided to conduct full reviews of the 

countervailing duty order and 

antidumping duty order on imports of 

certain pasta from Turkey. The 

Commission found that the respondent 

interested party group response with 

respect to Italy was inadequate. 

Notwithstanding the Commission’s 

adequacy determination regarding Italy, 

the Commission determined to conduct 

full reviews of the countervailing duty 

order and antidumping duty order on 

imports of certain pasta from Italy to 

promote administrative efficiency in 

light of its decision to conduct full 

reviews with respect to Turkey. A 

record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, 

and any individual Commissioner’s 

statements will be available from the 

Office of the Secretary and on the 

Commission’s Web site. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 2, 2013. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00048 Filed 1–4–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1121–0094] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Existing Collection; 

Comments Requested: Extension of a 

Currently Approved Collection; Annual 

Survey of Jails 

ACTION: 60-day notice. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be 

submitting the following information 


wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
960 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2013 / Notices 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. Comments 

are encouraged and will be accepted for 

sixty days until March 8, 2013. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

If you have comments especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Todd D. Minton, Bureau 

of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh Street 

NW., Washington, DC 20531 (phone: 

202–305–9630). 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Bureau of Justice 

Statistics, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including 

through the use of appropriate 

automated, electronic, mechanical, or 

other technological collection 

techniques or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Revisions of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: The 

Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ). The 

collection includes the forms: Annual 

Survey of Jails (ASJ), which includes the 

regular form and the certainty 

jurisdiction form; and the Survey of Jails 

in Indian Country (SJIC) regular form. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form numbers include: 

• Annual Survey of Jails: This 

collection consists of four forms: 

Æ CJ–5 and CJ–5A, the ASJ regular 

forms: These forms go to jail 

jurisdictions in the ASJ sample that are 

not selected with certainty. The CJ–5 

form goes to jail jurisdictions operated 

by the county or city and the CJ–5A goes 

to privately owned or operated 

confinement facilities; 

Æ CJ–5D and CJ–5DA, the ASJ 

certainty jurisdiction forms: The forms 

go to jail jurisdictions in the ASJ sample 

that are selected with certainty. The CJ– 

5D and CJ–5DA request additional 

information about the distribution of 

time served, staffing, and inmate 

misconduct that are not requested on 

the CJ–5 and CJ–5A. The CJ–5D goes to 

jurisdictions operated by the county or 

city; the CJ–5DA goes to confinement 

facilities administered by two or more 

governments and privately owned or 

operated confinement facilities. 

• Survey of Jails in Indian Country 

(SJIC): All respondents receive the CJ– 

5B (the SJIC regular form). 

The applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection is the Bureau of Justice 

Statistics, which is within the Office of 

Justice Programs. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: The affected public that will be 

asked to respond include approximately 

1,000 county, city, and Tribal jail 

authorities (929 respondents to the ASJ 

and 82 to the SJIC). As community 

institutions that book an estimated 12 

million inmates per year, local jails are 

an integral part of the justice system, 

operating at the front end (that is, 

following arrest or referral) as well as 

the back end (discharging inmates and 

holding those sentenced to jail). Their 

broad functions include handling 

inmates who are awaiting trial or 

sentencing, holding inmates for other 

authorities, detaining inmates with 

special needs such as mental health 

holds or alcohol detoxifications, 

transferring inmates to court 

appearances and bringing them back to 

detention, discharging inmates at the 

behest of the court or other entities, and 

holding inmates who have been 

sentenced to terms in jail. The set of 

collections in this package provides BJS 

with the capacity to track and analyze 

changes in the jail inmate population 

that might signal changes in the kinds 

of cases coming into or leaving the 

criminal justice system, and to analyze 

how the volatility of jail inmate 

populations affects the workload of jails 

and their capacities to provide services. 

The parallel structure of the SJIC 

collection provides BJS with this 

capacity for Indian country jails. 

In its entirety, this collection is the 

only national effort devoted to 

describing and understanding annual 

changes in jail populations as well as 

assessing programs and capacities to 

provide services. The collection enables 

BJS, other federal agencies, and state, 

local, and Tribal corrections authorities 

and administrators, as well as 

legislators, researchers, and jail planners 

to track growth in the number of jails 

and their capacities nationally; as well 

as, track changes in the demographics 

and supervision status of jail population 

and the prevalence of crowding. 

The forms and information content for 

this collection are outlined next in the 

following order: First, the components 

of the Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ), 

which include the CJ–5, CJ–5A, CJ–5D, 

and CJ–5DA. Second, the Survey of Jails 

in Indian Country (SJIC) includes the 

CJ–5B. 

The two components of the Annual 

Survey of Jails include the CJ–5/5A and 

CJ–5D/5DA forms. The CJ–5/5A forms 

are to be administered to ASJ sample 

elements that are selected with a 

probability of less than 1. The CJ–5D/ 

5DA forms are to be administered to ASJ 

sample elements selected with certainty. 

CJ–5 and CJ–5A 

For these forms, 555 respondents from 

sampled county and city jails will be 

asked to provide information for the 

following categories: 

(a) At midyear (last weekday in the 

month of June), the number of inmates 

confined in jail facilities including; 

male and female adult and juvenile 

inmates; persons under age 18 held as 

adults; race categories; held for Federal 

authorities, State prison authorities and 

other local jail jurisdictions. 

(b) At midyear, the number of 

convicted inmates that are unsentenced 

or sentenced and the number of 

unconvicted inmates awaiting trial/ 

arraignment, or transfers/holds for other 

authorities. 

(c) At midyear, the number of persons 

under jail supervision who were not 

U.S. citizens. 

(d) Whether the jail facilities has a 

weekend incarceration program prior to 

midyear and the number of inmates 

participating. 

(e) The number of new admissions 

into and final discharges from jail 

facilities during the last week in June. 

(f) The date and count for the greatest 

number of confined inmates during the 

30-day period in June. 

(g) The average daily population of 

jail facilities from July 1 of the previous 


wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2013 / Notices 961 

year to June 30 of the current collection 

year. 

(h) Jail capacity, measured three ways: 

rated capacity, operating capacity, and 

design capacity. 

(i) At midyear, the number of persons 

under jail supervision but not confined 

(e.g., electronic monitoring, day 

reporting, etc.). 

CJ–5D and CJ–5DA 

These forms will be administered to 

the certainty jurisdictions in the ASJ 

sample; in addition to the information 

collected in the regular ASJ forms (the 

CJ–5/5A), the 374 respondents that are 

included with certainty in the ASJ 

sample survey will be asked to provide 

additional information on the flow of 

inmates going through jails and the 

distribution of time served, staff 

characteristics and assaults on staff 

resulting in death, and inmate 

misconduct. More specifically, these 

include: 

(a) The distribution of time served by 

inmates discharged during the final 

week of June, broken out by whether the 

inmates were convicted or unconvicted. 

(b) At midyear, the number of 

correctional officers and other staff 

employed by jail facilities; 

(c) From July 1 of the previous year 

to June 30 of the current collection year: 

the number of inmate-inflicted physical 

assaults (and counts) on correctional 

officers and other staff and the number 

of staff deaths as a result. 

(d) From July 1 of the previous year 

to June 30 of the current collection year: 

the number of inmates, by category, who 

were written up or found guilty of a rule 

violation. 

CJ–5B 

The Survey of Jails in Indian Country 

is collected from Indian country 

correctional facilities operated by tribal 

authorities or the Bureau of Indian 

Affairs (BIA) (currently there are 82) 

will be asked to provide information for 

the following categories: 

(a) At midyear (last weekday in the 

month of June), the number of inmates 

confined in jail facilities including; 

male and female adult and juvenile 

inmates; persons under age 18 held as 

adults; convicted and unconvicted 

males and females; persons held for a 

felony, misdemeanor; their most serious 

offense (e.g., domestic violence offense, 

aggravated or simple assault, burglary, 

public intoxication, driving while 

intoxicated, etc.) 

(b) The average daily population 

during the 30-day period in June; 

(c) The date and count for the greatest 

number of confined inmates during the 

30-day period in June; 

(d) The number of new admissions 

into and final discharges during the 

month of June; 

(e) From July 1 of the previous year 

to June 30 of the current collection year: 

the number of inmate deaths while 

confined and the number of deaths 

attributed to suicide and the number of 

confined inmates that attempted 

suicide; 

(f) At midyear, the total rated capacity 

of jail facilities; 

(g) At midyear, the number 

correctional staff employed by the 

facility and their occupation (e.g., 

administration, jail operations, 

educational staff, etc.); 

(h) At midyear, how many jail 

operations employees had received the 

basic detention officer certification and 

how many had received 40 hours of inservice training; 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: Six hundred and thirty-seven 

respondents each taking an average 75 

minutes to respond for collection forms 

CJ–5 and CJ–5A, and CJ–5B. Three 

hundred and seventy-four respondents 

each taking 120 minutes to respond for 

collection forms CJ–5D and CJ–5DA. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: There are an estimated 1,544 

total burden hours associated with this 

collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Jerri Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 1407B, 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: January 2, 2013. 

Jerri Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00040 Filed 1–4–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1103–NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed New Collection; 

Comments Requested: Enhancing 

Community Policing Through 

Community Mediation Surveys 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ) 

Office of Community Oriented Policing 

Services (COPS) will be submitting the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The revision of 

a previously approved information 

collection is published to obtain 

comments from the public and affected 

agencies. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for 60 days for public comment until 

March 8, 2013. This process is 

conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 

1320.10. 

If you have comments, especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Danielle Ouellette, 

Department of Justice Office of 

Community Oriented Policing Services, 

145 N Street NE., Washington, DC 

20530. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Proposed new collection; comments 

requested. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Enhancing Community Policing 

Through Community Mediation 

Surveys. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

None. U.S. Department of Justice Office 

of Community Oriented Policing 

Services. 


wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with