alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jeffrey Gruskin et al., Respondents, v Glenn R. Edelstein, Appellant.

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated February 16, 1990, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to compel Allstate Insurance Company to accept a conditional release and pay them the amount of a settlement.

Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The plaintiff Jeffrey Gruskin and the defendant were involved in an automobile accident. Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate), the defendant’s insurance carrier, offered the $10,000 limit of defendant’s policy in settlement of the action. The plaintiffs, who had a liability policy with Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, had $50,000 in uninsured/ underinsured motorist coverage. Thus, upon Allstate’s settlement offer, the plaintiff forwarded to Allstate a conditional general release for $10,000. The release provided, in part, as follows: "It is specifically understood that an underinsured claim has been made by [plaintiffs] against its underinsured carrier Aetna life and casualty * * * and that said insurance carrier will reserve its rights for subrogation against [defendant] for those sums paid to [plaintiffs] under the under-insured motorist coverage and this release is specifically so conditioned.”

Allstate rejected the conditional general release, and the plaintiffs subsequently moved to compel Allstate to accept the conditional release on behalf of the defendant.

The court granted that relief and we now reverse. The court’s order improperly interfered with the parties’ rights to negotiate a settlement, and there is no legal authority to support the determination in the order appealed from. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JORGE AGUILAR-VALLEJO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10518

D.C. No. 5:08-cr-00870-JW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

James Ware, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Aguilar-Vallejo appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion

to dismiss the indictment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we dismiss.

FILED

OCT 28 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10518

Aguilar-Vallejo contends that the district court erred when it denied his

motion to dismiss the indictment. When Aguilar-Vallejo entered an unconditional

guilty plea, however, he waived the right to appeal the denial of his motion to

dismiss. See Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973). We therefore do not

address the merits of Aguilar-Vallejo’s motion to dismiss. See United States v.

Lopez-Armenta, 400 F.3d 1173, 1175 (9th Cir. 2005). 

DISMISSED.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


          KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below, being a member of the Board of Directors of Adaptive Broadband
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitutes and appoints Donna S. Birks and
Kenneth J. Wees, and each of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
agent, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign on his behalf the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2000,
and to execute any amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, with the full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing necessary or advisable to be done in connection
therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and
agent, or her or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

DATED:       July 26, 2000

/s/ FREDERICK D. LAWRENCE                 /s/ WILLIAM B. MARX, JR.
_____________________________             _______________________________
Frederick D. Lawrence                     William B. Marx, Jr.


/s/ LESLIE G. DENEND                      /s/ JAMES T. RICHARDSON
_____________________________             _______________________________
Leslie G. Denend                          James T. Richardson


/s/ JAMES C. GRANGER                      /s/ TERRY W. WARD
_____________________________             _______________________________
James C. Granger                          Terry W. Ward


/s/ GEORGE A. JOULWAN                     /s/ FREDERICK W. WHITRIDGE, JR.
_____________________________             _______________________________
George A. Joulwan                         Frederick W. Whitridge, Jr.

/s/ WILLIAM L. MARTIN
_______________________
Willaim L. Martin
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00113-CV

In the Interest of L.J.C.S., Minor Child

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2014-FAM-60639-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 16, 2015
TAI THE 72 XHS £&juRT c?/^ CRimfanL APPEALS

CHrrLGS /YUWTfkl I CoA up, g a -/g - aim,a 3-de

\f I CdA AID. P0-IS77-4

Tl-llFST/t7£r #P7BC/PS

MDTfDN FOR f\£l4£frR\ti&

Nd\A) Com£5 yr?r. rJ/*r/r<< /n»r¥t* , 77)r>-K-Tf) JFk///,l//9 , And

fi//fj his fdra-sc fflo-ftan /^od R(=H,£ARihGr- jmfib ftt^u^ nry-en-ft'cmeJ

//? s7<an £'£ . \Alhere -ffa Pe^/ffon/U- /O/sdreAan&ry fie l>/<?u> , A#-s ncrzxJ

re-fLs-eJ Lg 7^is CausJ'o^ dri/>mn&/ Appeals,

fflQ reffV&ner /App^//a/i r-/?^zo £eeks r*><±sn SLalcr^r&yi <3 -P PAo

Pro-3-e p-e^i-fr^. Al-Aai^A if <z/o<Z± nof' /azi/C fi/c<= rfludA -£rznr\ -f-Axz

Appear ande>. L+ sAoujj irufh, &r>a tcn-fairriess f/ofJu? fippeaU prdC<ssJ',

A-s ukS/os vtdlnfim^ ofl Pb> faAe o^Lftto (krftsfcm j£u&) jy, fi^

/»/_r *ppe//A>*A ctfh+s £r »J/ fa «W^p ?"?**"+A+s*iJi h-enS,** "fa fa 3<?n-P #nJ Q*r>5,de&Jbty Ho Appe/!/?7e CajLirt /3<^/r/ne/ts rrapvrkzl>

WM fir^m^M^ reJUJ 6y. A* Surf^hm.'w/ App^s *

$GO I S, i=/ruJL£n

COUBT'OF'CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR OB VH

Ab«»Aeosla,Clert<
NUMBER 13-09-00459-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

VIDAL JOE SANCHEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Vidal Joe Sanchez, by and through his attorney, has filed a withdrawal

of notice of appeal and request for dismissal because he no longer desires to prosecute

it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the

motion to withdraw the appeal and dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42.2(a). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for
2

rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 1st day of October, 2009.
Exhibit
32(e)







CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Florida Power Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey J. Lyash, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Jeffrey J.
Lyash


Jeffrey
J. Lyash


President
and Chief Executive Officer


February
26, 2008








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
[No. 37487.

Department Two.

May 20, 1965.]

#### Wesley Kazen *et al., Repondents,*v. John Misich *et al.,*Appellants.*

*Carr & Priest,*for appellants.

*Clarence J. Coleman,*for respondents.

*

Reported in 402 P.2d 359.

Per Curiam.

Respondents instituted this action based on two causes of action: (1) to recover for rent due on 35 acres of land leased by appellants on which to raise a crop of peas, and (2) to recover damages accruing to respondents arising out of appellants’ breach of contract to remove the pea crop as agreed between the parties.

The action arose out of. an oral agreement entered into between appellants and respondents that appellants would lease 35 acres from respondents to plant peas in the spring of 1962, and would pay $30 per acre, either in cash or pea ensilage. Appellants did not question that the balance due on the lease was $600, which they tendered into court after the action was commenced.

The court, sitting without a jury, found that $600 was due for rental of the land and that respondents were damaged in the sum of $685 for the cost of seed, plowing, discing and reworking the land the following spring.

Respondents contend that, under the agreement, since hay seeds were to be planted along with the peas, as was done, it was the duty of appellants to remove the pea crop from the field.

The appellants contend there was no agreement to remove the crop.

The court found that the appellants agreed to remove the pea vines and pea crop, that they failed to do so and that respondents were damaged as a result thereof.

In this case, this court has carefully considered the briefs, the oral arguments and the record. Upon the ground that the appellants have failed to demonstrate that the assignments of error warrant reversal, the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dean L. Cash, Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of ATEL
Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 17, 2007



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Dean L. Cash             
|Dean L. Cash                 
|President and Chief Executive
|Officer of Managing Member   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 07-14-00095-CR OFFENSE: 1

Michael Bridges v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Randall

\ta-is

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 251st District Court

DATE:12/17/2014 Publish: YES TCCASE#: 24,140-C

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Michael Bridges v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#: ifei-zs APPELLANT^ Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

R&Fc/jel>. JUDGE:

DATE: 03\ltfI^OiS" SIGNED: PC:

JUDGE: r,gA OUAc^-. PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit 32(f)







CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Florida Power Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter M. Scott III, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Peter M. Scott
III


Peter M.
Scott III


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


February
26, 2008








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
  W I T N E S S E T H
     SEVERANCE BENEFITS




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



PAYMENT LIMITATION
  RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
  4




---



##### 



MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT
  SEVERABILITY
  5




---



##### 



STRICT ADHERENCE
  ASSIGNMENT
  OTHER RIGHTS
  NOTICES
  6




---



##### 



ERISA; NON-PROPERTY INTEREST
  GOVERNING LAW
  7




---



##### 



COUNTERPARTS; FACSIMILE SIGNATURES, EXECUTION AND DELIVERY
  TAXES
   8




---



##### 



SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS ALLIANCE, INC.By:
    /s/ Courtney C. SmithCourtney C. SmithPresident & Chief Executive OfficerHOLDERBy:
    /s/ Barry G. CordeiroBarry G. Cordeiro 9
Order entered April 15, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00370-CV

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V.

RONALD GILES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-07841

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s April 13, 2015 unopposed motion for an extension of time to 

file a brief. Appellant shall file a brief by MAY 21, 2015. We caution appellant that no further 

extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1365 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1365

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To make technical corrections to the Guam World War II Loyalty 
                            Recognition Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO GUAM WORLD WAR II LOYALTY 
              RECOGNITION ACT.

    Title XVII of division A of Public Law 114-328 is amended--
            (1) in section 1703(e)--
                    (A) by striking ``equal to'' and inserting ``not to 
                exceed''; and
                    (B) by striking ``covered into the Treasury as 
                miscellaneous receipts'' and inserting ``used to 
                reimburse the applicable appropriations'';
            (2) in section 1704(a) by striking ``, subject to the 
        availability of appropriations,'' and inserting ``from the 
        Claims Fund''; and
            (3) by striking section 1707(a).

SEC. 2. BUDGETARY TREATMENT OF TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Determination of Budgetary Effects.--As the budgetary effects 
for spending provided by this Act were estimated and offset as part of 
the enactment of the Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition Act (title 
XVII of division A of Public Law 114-328), the budgetary effects of 
this Act shall be determined as if the amendments made by this Act were 
included in the enactment of the Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition 
Act (title XVII of division A of Public Law 114-328), for purposes of 
the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go 
Act of 2010.
    (b) Pay-As-You-Go Compliance.--The budgetary effects of this Act, 
for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 
2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled 
``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for 
printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House 
Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior 
to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1365

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To make technical corrections to the Guam World War II Loyalty 
                            Recognition Act.
```
<PAGE>
Exhibit 21

          Subsidiaries.  
     238
<PAGE>
Subsidiaries

     The subsidiaries of Brenton Banks, Inc., their location, the 
jurisdiction in which they are incorporated or organized, and the names 
under which subsidiaries do business are:

Name Under which Subsidiary                               Jurisdiction in
Does Business and Location                             which Incorporated or
    of Subsidiary                                            Organized

     Banks

Brenton Savings Bank, FSB                                   United States
Ames, Iowa

Brenton Bank                                                Iowa
Des Moines, Iowa


  Non-Bank Subsidiaries

Brenton Investments, Inc.                                   Iowa
Des Moines, Iowa

Brenton Insurance Services, Inc.                            Iowa
Des Moines, Iowa

Brenton Mortgages, Inc.                                     Iowa
Des Moines, Iowa

Brenton Insurance Inc.                                      Iowa
Adel, Iowa

Brenton Realty Services, Ltd.                               Iowa
Marshalltown, Iowa

Brenton Savings Financial Services, Inc.                    Iowa
Ames, Iowa
     239
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00386

- CV
Christopher Martinez and all Occupants v. Anna Rodriguez
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2020

- CCV

- 61041

- 5

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. No costs are assessed as the appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs. We further order this decision certified below for observance. December 10, 2020
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00244]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2010-0012; OMB No. 1660-0022]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request; Community Rating System (CRS) Program--
Application Worksheets and Commentary

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On Tuesday, November 27, 2012, the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency (FEMA) published a notice in the Federal Register at 77 FR 70798 
notifying the public that it was submitting a request for review and 
approval of a collection of information under the emergency processing 
procedures in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulation 5 CFR 
1320.13.
    In that notice, FEMA stated that it was requesting that the 
approval authorize FEMA to use the collection through June 14, 2012. 
The correct date is June 14, 2013.

    Dated: December 19, 2012.
Loretta A. Cassatt,
Executive Officer, Records Management Division, Mission Support Bureau, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2013-00244 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-52-P
OMB.1845.0101.v.2 Table 30 Day Comment Period

Respondent Type Requirement # of Respondents # of Responses Hours/Response Total Hours 

Section A: Burden by Affected Entity

Individuals or Households

Borrowers 34 CFR 601.10 1,900,608 1,900,608 0.17 323,103

Borrowers 34 CFR 601.11 3,666,960 3,666,960 0.25 916,740

Borrowers 34 CFR 601.40 3,666,960 3,666,960 0.08 293,357

Sub-total 9,234,528 9,234,528 1,533,200

Private Sector

 Business or other for-profits

Institutions - Proprietary-preferred lender lists 34 CFR 601.10 88 88 439

Institutions - Proprietary -adopt TILA form 34 CFR 601.11 88 263

Institutions - Proprietary -TILA disclosures 34 CFR 601.11 183,348 60,505

Institutions-Proprietary - Annual Report 34 CFR 601.20 88 22

Institutions - Proprietary-Code of Conduct 34 CFR 601.21 88 132

Lender Responsibility-TILA disclosures 34 CFR 601.40 884 3,666,960 0.17 623,383

Lender Responsibility- reasonable expense 34 CFR 601.40 884 0.33 292

Sub-total 972 3,851,544 685,036

 Not-for profits

Institutions - Private 34 CFR 601.10 984 984 4,920

Institutions - Private-adopt TILA form 34 CFR 601.11 984 2,952

Institutions - Private- TILA disclosures 34 CFR 601.11 2,053,498 677,654

Institutions - Private-Annual Report 34 CFR 601.20 984 246

Institutions - Private-Code of Conduct 34 CFR 601.21 984 1,476

Sub-total 984 2,057,434 687,248

State, Local, or Tribal Governments

Institutions - Public 34 CFR 601.10 685 685 3,426

Institutions - Public-adopt TILA form 34 CFR 601.11 685 2,056

Institutions - Public-adopt TILA disclosures 34 CFR 601.11 1,430,114 471,938

Institutions - Public-Annual Report 34 CFR 601.20 685 171

Institutions - Public-Code of Conduct 34 CFR 601.21 685 1,028

Sub-total 685 1,432,854 478,619

Total 9,237,169 16,576,360 3,384,103
CURRENT INVENTORY

Current # of Respondents 13,674,883

Current # of Responses 13,674,883

Current Inventory of Hours 3,197,761

REVISED # OF RESPONDENTS 9,237,169

REVISED # OF RESPONSES 16,576,360

REVISED # OF BURDEN HOURS 3,384,103

TOTAL # RESPONDENTS 9,237,169

TOTAL # RESPONSES 16,576,360

TOTAL # HOURS 3,384,103

Difference -4,437,714 2,901,477 186,342