alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
i _ L


# OAR Box 1802 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



# Document

Number: 

# 30 ) IV-E-2 5 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/2008 11:57:59 AM

Sheet30 of 117P. 2

1 Dat e sent : From : To : Copie s to : Subject : Mon , 2 6 Oc t 199 8 08:31:1 2 050 0

JO N DEVIN E <DCWIC01.DEVINEJON@RT-MAIL2.RTP.EPA.GO V> CRUMPLER.DENNIS@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV , S0L0M0N.DAVID@EPAMAIL.EPA.GO V SILVERMAN.STEVEN@EPAMAIL.EPA.GO V NS R meetin g -Forwarde d Attache d i s a brie fdocke t entrytha t shoul d b e incorporate d int o th e NS R refor m docket
. I t wa s drafte d b yStev e Silverma n o fOGC , wh o attende d a meetin g wit h pul p an d pape rconcern s las t week
. CONFIDENTIA LPREDECISIONAL : Doe s No t Represen t AgencyPositio n 

# Ji-e-z s

Mala yJinda l 

### - 1 Tue , 2 7 Oct 199 8 09:23:1 2P. 3
S ,•*•* > Dat e sent : Sat , 2 4 Oc t 199 8 14:17:0 5 040 0 From : STEVE N SILVERMA N < SILVERMAN.STEVEN@EPAMAIL.EPA.GO V> To : F00TE.GREG0RY@EPAMAIL.EPA.GO V Subject : NS R meetin g pleas e pu t followin g int o docke t fo rpropose d rul e MEMORANDU M TO : NS R Rulemakin g Docke t FROM : Steve n Silverman , Attorne y RE : Meetin g betwee n EP

AOfficial s an d Pul p an d Pape rIndustry Representative s O n Octobe r22,199 8 senio rEP Aofficials , includin g Assistan t Administrato rPerciasepe , an d Diviso n Director s Wegma n an d Jorda n me t wit h representative s o fth e pul p an d pape rindustr yincludin g Josephin e Coope ran d representative s fro m Unio n Camp , Georgi a Pacifi c an d othe rcompanies
. Thei rsubjec t wa s th e pendin g NS R rulemakin g proposal
. The ymaintaine d tha t th e existin g progra m i s to o complicate d an d enforce d i n a n arbitrar ymanner . The ybeliev e tha t to o man yke y decision s tur n o n interpretation s whic h are no t alway s disclose d an d mayvaryfro m Regio n t o Region
. The yals o questio n th e burde n involve d i n determinin g whethe ra pollutio n releas e incremen t triggerin g NS R revie wha s becom e to o complicated , an d furthe rquestio n mean s o fcalculatin g pollutan t increases
. EP Aofficial s listene d carefull yan d urge d th e industr yt o provid e specifi cexample s o rcas e historie s wher e possible
. I n addition , th e Assistan t Administrato rnote d tha t th e 4 0 to n incremen t appears t o b e a concensu s valu e as t o whe n NS R revie wshoul d b e triggered
. 

## 'sjarM-lYcance ,

Mala yJinda l - •1 • - Tue , 2 7 Oct 199 8 09:17:4 7
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Alvarez, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered June 2, 1987, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him as a second felony offender to a term of imprisonment of from 8 to 16 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was acquitted of intentional murder and felony murder, but convicted of robbery in the first degree in that in the course of forcibly stealing property he used or threatened the immediate use of a knife (Penal Law § 160.15 [3]). On appeal, defendant argues that the felony murder and robbery counts should not have been submitted in the alternative, unless there was some view of the evidence which would have permitted the jury to find that he committed one of those crimes but not the other. According to defendant, no such view of the evidence exists. The evidence, defendant asserts, shows only that he committed both of these crimes or neither.

“It has been widely acknowledged that factual inconsistencies in a verdict * * * do not constitute a ground for reversal, provided, of course, that the verdict is not repugnant as a matter of law” *(People v Montgomery,*116 AD2d 669, 670). As the evidence adduced at trial was legally sufficient to support a finding of guilt on the felony murder count, it suffices to explain the jury’s verdict acquitting defendant of murder and convicting him of robbery as simply an act of mercy *(People v Tucker,*55 NY2d 1, 8; *People v Montgomery, supra).*Concur— Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.
.. .. 

nISSInTRAVEL SERVICE (U.S.A.), .Inc. >}­

We Service the World. 

3/1112010 

. The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood:· 

On behalf ofNISSIN TRAVEL SERVICE USA INC DETROIT BRANCH,:I am 

writing to express our strong support for the application ofDelta Air Lines for new"­

nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where 

many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are over 5000 

Japanese companies located in Michigan and hundreds more whose business models rely 

on access to Japan and it's market. The growth of our business ties with Japan has created 

demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the convenience 

offlying into Tokyo;s downtown Haneda airport. 

Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can 

support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong 

Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make it the airlines gateway to 

Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit 

our business travelers. 

Thank you for consideration ofthis request. 

Daichi HIROFUJI 


Branch Manager 


38'177 WEST SIX MILE ROAD· SUITE 304 • LIVONIA, MICHIGAN 48152 • PH: (734) 432-0300 • FAX: (734) 432-0298' 1-800-586-3939
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe annual report of Cascade Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ ROBERT  C. WARREN, JR. |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Robert C. Warren, Jr.      |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer*       |   |
| April 13, 2007             |   |
| /s/ RICHARD S. ANDERSON         |   |
| Richard S. Anderson             |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer*       |   |
| April 13, 2007             |   |

 

----
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Exhibit
32.2










Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Finlay
Enterprises, Inc., (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1,
2008 (the “Report”) that:
 
 1.
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the SecuritiesExchange
      Act of 1934; and
 2.
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financialcondition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
December 16, 2008




/s/
      Bruce
      E. ZurlnickBruce
      E. ZurlnickSenior
      Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
  Officer
   The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
June 25, 2015

Mr. Will Leverett 300 S Lamar Blvd Apt 426 Austin, TX 78704

Dear Mr. Leverett:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 15, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2256), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SEVEN

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 351

(ex Article 307 TEC)

(ex Article 307 TEC)

The rights and obligations arising from agreements concluded before 1 January 1958 or, for acceding States, before the date of their accession, between one or more Member States on the one hand, and one or more third countries on the other, shall not be affected by the provisions of the Treaties.

To the extent that such agreements are not compatible with the Treaties, the Member State or States concerned shall take all appropriate steps to eliminate the incompatibilities established. Member States shall, where necessary, assist each other to this end and shall, where appropriate, adopt a common attitude.

In applying the agreements referred to in the first paragraph, Member States shall take into account the fact that the advantages accorded under the Treaties by each Member State form an integral part of the establishment of the Union and are thereby inseparably linked with the creation of common institutions, the conferring of powers upon them and the granting of the same advantages by all the other Member States.

---
# EUR-Lex - 12012M055 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M055

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE VI: FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 55 (ex Article 53 TEU) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0045 - 0045 *

Article 55

(ex Article 53 TEU)

1. This Treaty, drawn up in a single original in the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Irish, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish languages, the texts in each of these languages being equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the Italian Republic, which will transmit a certified copy to each of the governments of the other signatory States.

2. This Treaty may also be translated into any other languages as determined by Member States among those which, in accordance with their constitutional order, enjoy official status in all or part of their territory. A certified copy of such translations shall be provided by the Member States concerned to be deposited in the archives of the Council.

--------------------------------------------------
# C_2016202EN.01014301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/143 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/143

---

Article 214

1.   The Union's operations in the field of humanitarian aid shall be conducted within the framework of the principles and objectives of the external action of the Union. Such operations shall be intended to provide ad hoc assistance and relief and protection for people in third countries who are victims of natural or man-made disasters, in order to meet the humanitarian needs resulting from these different situations. The Union's measures and those of the Member States shall complement and reinforce each other.

ad hoc

2.   Humanitarian aid operations shall be conducted in compliance with the principles of international law and with the principles of impartiality, neutrality and non-discrimination.

3.   The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish the measures defining the framework within which the Union's humanitarian aid operations shall be implemented.

4.   The Union may conclude with third countries and competent international organisations any agreement helping to achieve the objectives referred to in paragraph 1 and in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union.

The first subparagraph shall be without prejudice to Member States' competence to negotiate in international bodies and to conclude agreements.

5.   In order to establish a framework for joint contributions from young Europeans to the humanitarian aid operations of the Union, a European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps shall be set up. The European Parliament and the Council, acting by means of regulations in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall determine the rules and procedures for the operation of the Corps.

6.   The Commission may take any useful initiative to promote coordination between actions of the Union and those of the Member States, in order to enhance the efficiency and complementarity of Union and national humanitarian aid measures.

7.   The Union shall ensure that its humanitarian aid operations are coordinated and consistent with those of international organisations and bodies, in particular those forming part of the United Nations system.

---
\ SERVED: September 19, 2016 

- . ' .... 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRA'&SJ?ORTATION 

In The Matter Of: 

Offshore Flight School, Inc. 

Respondent 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

·~ : ::: ' ·-~ : ·') (; ; ~---::~ 3~ ! .~. i3 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0691 

Case No. 2014WP910016 

PREHEARING CONFERENCE REPORT 

On September 16, 2016, the undersigned judge held a prehearing conference in the above 

captioned case. Counsel for the Complainant attended the conference telephonically; the 

Respondent's counsel failed to appear. The parties discussed the following: 

1. Settlement 

a. The parties have a signed settlement agreement resolving this case. 

b. As part of the agreement, the Respondent agreed to file a motion to withdraw the 

request for a hearing. 

2. Dismissal 

The undersigned judge will issue a Dismissal Order once the withdrawal is filed. 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

David Glenn Bettencourt, Respondent's Counsel 

Dillingham Transportation Building, Suite 304 

735 Bishop Street 

Honolulu, HI 96813 

TEL: 808-521-3491 

FAX: 808-521-3494 

Charles Raley, Complainant's Counsel 

Enforcement Division/ AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-3357 

FAX: 202-267.,5106 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0691 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430.
# EUR-Lex - 12012M028 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M028

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE V: GENERAL PROVISIONS ON THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION AND SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY - Chapter 2: Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy - Section 1: Common provisions - Article 28 (ex Article 14 TEU) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0032 - 0032 *

Article 28

(ex Article 14 TEU)

1. Where the international situation requires operational action by the Union, the Council shall adopt the necessary decisions. They shall lay down their objectives, scope, the means to be made available to the Union, if necessary their duration, and the conditions for their implementation.

If there is a change in circumstances having a substantial effect on a question subject to such a decision, the Council shall review the principles and objectives of that decision and take the necessary decisions.

2. Decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall commit the Member States in the positions they adopt and in the conduct of their activity.

3. Whenever there is any plan to adopt a national position or take national action pursuant to a decision as referred to in paragraph 1, information shall be provided by the Member State concerned in time to allow, if necessary, for prior consultations within the Council. The obligation to provide prior information shall not apply to measures which are merely a national transposition of Council decisions.

4. In cases of imperative need arising from changes in the situation and failing a review of the Council decision as referred to in paragraph 1, Member States may take the necessary measures as a matter of urgency having regard to the general objectives of that decision. The Member State concerned shall inform the Council immediately of any such measures.

5. Should there be any major difficulties in implementing a decision as referred to in this Article, a Member State shall refer them to the Council which shall discuss them and seek appropriate solutions. Such solutions shall not run counter to the objectives of the decision referred to in paragraph 1 or impair its effectiveness.

--------------------------------------------------
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 15, 2015

No. 04-14-00866-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G.F., A.F.F. AND E.H.F., CHILDREN,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-05746

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The District Clerk's Notification of Late Record is hereby NOTED. Clerk's record is due 

no later than May, 1, 2015.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                          WIRELESS TELECOM GROUP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                   (UNAUDITED)

                                        For the Three Months         For the Six Months
                                           Ended June 30,              Ended June 30,
                                     -------------------------   -------------------------
                                         2006          2005          2006         2005
                                     -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------

Net Income                           $   189,868   $ 1,058,870   $ 1,206,373   $ 2,129,471
                                     ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
BASIC EARNINGS:
Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding                 25,851,279    17,487,376    25,787,421    17,474,720
                                     ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
Basic earnings per common share      $      0.01   $      0.06   $      0.05   $      0.12
                                     ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
DILUTED EARNINGS:
Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding                 25,851,279    17,487,376    25,787,421    17,474,720
Assumed exercise of stock options        107,089       120,911       314,865       153,468
                                     -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding, as adjusted    25,958,368    17,608,287    26,102,286    17,628,188
                                     ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
Diluted earnings per common share    $      0.01   $      0.06   $      0.05   $      0.12
                                     ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
```
# C_2016203EN.01004801.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/48

---

Article 196

For the purposes of this Treaty, save as otherwise provided therein:

| (a) | ‘person’ means any natural person who pursues all or any of his activities in the territories of Member States within the field specified in the relevant chapter of this Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

‘person’ means any natural person who pursues all or any of his activities in the territories of Member States within the field specified in the relevant chapter of this Treaty;

| (b) | ‘undertaking’ means any undertaking or institution which pursues all or any of its activities in the territories of Member States within the field specified in the relevant Chapter of this Treaty, whatever its public or private legal status. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

‘undertaking’ means any undertaking or institution which pursues all or any of its activities in the territories of Member States within the field specified in the relevant Chapter of this Treaty, whatever its public or private legal status.

---
RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 4/20/2015 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK