alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
,1//? 9(1 /W-J)/ RECEIVED IN 14/K. SA•I ' r "I COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_ . / , , ,* / m 08 2015

«oei Acosta, Clerh

Tfe 7r/*l dur/ drdtfrd/Lt^-e/ A r<Ss/2>/,s/ /a

Atf^Vcr aA*,* fif MtMcJtfr a&s&Mtf jf^Lu/

***** <* ,M£U;«~'.**

S-3--<Z0/f
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

AMERICAN AUTO LOGISTICS, LP,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, INTERNATIONAL AUTO 

LOGISTICS, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2014-5132

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:14-cv-00102-MBH, Judge Marian Blank 

Horn.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

TIMOTHY A. SULLIVAN, Thompson Coburn, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by KATHERINE S. NUCCI, JAYNA MARIE RUST; SCOTT F.

LANE, St. Louis, MO.

DOUGLAS K. MICKLE, Commercial Litigation Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United 
 

States. Also represented by JOYCE R. BRANDA, ROBERT E.

KIRSCHMAN, JR., MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR. 

WALTER BRAD ENGLISH, Maynard, Cooper & Gale, 

P.C., Huntsville, AL, argued for defendant-appellee 

International Auto Logistics, LLC. Also represented by

EMILY J. CHANCEY, JOHN ANDREW WATSON, III, GARY L.

RIGNEY, JON DAVIDSON LEVIN. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
Frank Crowley Courts Building, 133 North Riverfront Boulevard, LB-19 Dallas, Texas 75207-4399 (214) 653-3600

SUSAN HAWK

CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

April 8, 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court 

Court of Criminal Appeals 

P.O. Box 12308 

Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas 78711 

Re: Court of Criminal Appeals Writ Nos. WR-82,850-01 and WR-82,850-02; 

 Trial Court Cause Nos. W08-71994-V(A) and W11-00273-V(A); 

Ex parte Anthony Eugene Johnson

Dear Mr. Acosta: 

On March 13, 2015, the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office filed a Clerk’s Record in 

the above-mentioned cases.1 That record contains the Applicant’s Proposed Findings of Fact and 

Conclusions of Law, which were signed by the trial court on March 11, 2015. The State was not 

served with a copy of the signed findings or otherwise notified of the trial court’s ruling (which 

recommends that relief be granted in Applicant’s cases) until yesterday, April 7, 2015, when the 

undersigned received a hard copy of the signed findings in her mailbox. 

Please allow this letter to serve as notice that, with all possible speed, the State will 

prepare and file with the trial court, The State’s Objections to Applicant’s Proposed Findings of 

Fact and Conclusions of Law in the above-mentioned cases. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Christine Womble 

 Assistant District Attorney 

 State Bar No. 24035991 

 Frank Crowley Courts Building 

 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-19 

 Dallas, Texas 75207-4399 

 (214) 653-3625 

 (214) 653-3643 fax 

 

1 The Court’s website reflects that the record was received on March 18, 2015. The State notes that on 

March 20, 2015, the Court granted a 60-day extension of time for findings to be completed. 

WR-82,850-01

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/8/2015 9:19:07 AM

Accepted 4/8/2015 9:27:57 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

 RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 4/8/2015 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK 
Frank Crowley Courts Building, 133 North Riverfront Boulevard, LB-19 Dallas, Texas 75207-4399 (214) 653-3600

2

cc: The Hon. Brandon Birmingham, Judge 292nd Judicial District Court (via email)

Bruce Anton (via email)

Randy Schaffer (via email)
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00267]



[[Page 1851]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL13-35-000]


Southwestern Public Service Company; Southwest Power Pool, Inc.; 
Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on December 31, 2012, pursuant to section 206 of 
the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2000), Southwestern Public 
Service Company (Complainant) filed a formal complaint against 
Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (Respondent), requesting the establishment 
of a January 1, 2013 refund effective date and a finding from the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) that the Respondent 
has violated the FPA by implementing a 40 percent increase in the Tri-
County Electric Cooperative, Inc. Annual Transmission Revenue 
Requirement through an annual update under transmission formula rate 
protocols that are not just and reasonable.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's 
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before 
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and 
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#783e3d2a3b37161411161d2b0d0808170a0c381e1d0a1b561f170e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="25636077666a4b494c4b40765055554a575165434057460b424a53">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 22, 2013.

    Dated: January 3, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-00267 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XVIII

ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND TERRITORIAL COHESION

ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND TERRITORIAL COHESION

Article 176

(ex Article 160 TEC)

(ex Article 160 TEC)

The European Regional Development Fund is intended to help to redress the main regional imbalances in the Union through participation in the development and structural adjustment of regions whose development is lagging behind and in the conversion of declining industrial regions.

---
#### Michael L. SHORT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Samuel SMITH, Warden, Utah State Prison, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 14393.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 26, 1976.

Michael L. Short, pro se.

Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., Earl F. Dorius, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Affirmed

Short was charged in the Salt Lake City, Utah Court by title, chapter and section with forgery,1 a third-degree felony. In detailing, the complaint has the words “did attempt” to commit the offense in the body thereof. He was bound over to the district court and likewise charged by information and the quoted words were deleted by the district judge before Short entered his plea. He was represented by competent counsel and was convicted of the felony before a jury, sentenced and committed. He did not perfect an appeal within time, but later on filed the within writ, asserting that he should have been convicted only of a misdemeanor because of the quoted but deleted words mentioned.

His appeal is without merit, since 1) he cannot substitute a habeas corpus proceeding for an orderly, statutory appeal,2 and 2) charging him by the common law name of the offense and referring to the statute (title, chapter and section) galvanizes and settles the charge,3 irrespective of conflict in language in the detailed description of the offense as a misdemeanor, and anyway the information may be corrected before plea.4

ELLETT, CROCKETT, TUCKETT and MAUGHAN, JJ., concur.

1

. Title 76, Chapter 6, Sec. 501, U.C.A.1953, as amended.

2

. *Bryant v. Turner,*19 Utah 2d 284, 431 P.2d 121 (1967).

3

. *Harris v. Smith,*541 P.2d 343 (Utah 1975).

4

. Title 77-17-3, U.C.A.1953, as amended.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 14, 2015

jam

Order 

Clerk

April 14, 2015

151398 (23)

JOHN ARTHUR HARRIS, JR., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 151398

COA: 324325

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $14.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$361.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") by Cascade Natural
Gas Corporation (the "Company"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

| |  |  | W. Brian Matsuyama Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer      
| |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | J. D. Wessling Senior Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VIII

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY

CHAPTER 3

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

Article 135

(ex Article 115 TEC)

(ex Article 115 TEC)

For matters within the scope of Articles 121(4), 126 with the exception of paragraph 14, 138, 140(1), 140(2), first subparagraph, 140(3) and 219, the Council or a Member State may request the Commission to make a recommendation or a proposal, as appropriate. The Commission shall examine this request and submit its conclusions to the Council without delay.

---
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 91 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States protecting 

the right of citizens to vote. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2020 

Mr. COOPER submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States protecting the right of citizens to vote. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 91 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SEC. 1. The right of a citizen of the United States, 

3 who is 18 years of age or older, to vote, shall not be denied 

4 or abridged by the United States or by any State, unless, 

5 at the time of an election, such citizen is serving a sen6 tence of imprisonment for a felony in a correctional facil7 ity. 

8 ‘‘SEC. 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce 

9 this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Cagle’s, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended April 2, 2011 (the “Report”), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/   J. Douglas Cagle                            |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| J.   Douglas Cagle                                |   |
| Chairman,   Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
| (Principal   Executive Officer)                   |   |
| Date:   June 8, 2011                         |   |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darlene Simmons, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Roberts, J.), rendered October 24, 1989, convicting defendant on her plea of guilty of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The defendant claims on appeal that she was promised, via a written agreement with the District Attorney’s office, that she would receive a minimum sentence of 2 to 4 years, or, in the alternative, lifetime probation. The record shows that the written agreement was not presented to the court, and was not part of the conditional sentence promised by the court. Defendant failed to appear for sentencing and was ultimately returned on a warrant as a result of an arrest. The 2 to 4 year sentence which defendant was allegedly promised was conditioned upon the defendant’s cooperation, which she has failed to demonstrate on the record.

The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive. In any event, defendant did not preserve her right to appeal the imposed sentence. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-14-00555-CV

____________________

IN THE ESTATE OF TOM RICHARD DOYLE SR.

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11853

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The appellant, Tom Richard Doyle Jr., filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. 

The motion is voluntarily made by the appellant prior to any decision of this Court. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed notice of appeal. We grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 CHARLES KREGER

 Justice
2

 

Submitted on April 15, 2015

Opinion Delivered April 16, 2015

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
## 

Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-71286, 33-51377, 33-38501, and 33-29801 on Form S-3,
and Nos. 33-61035, 33-39873, and 333-88419 on Form S-8 of Cascade Natural Gas Corporation of our reports dated November 10, 2000,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cascade Natural Gas Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2000.

DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP

Seattle,
Washington
December 18, 2000

---

## QuickLinks
24766 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2012 / Notices 

hours of the docket are indicated above 

in the same location. You may also see 

the comments on the Internet. To read 

the comments on the Internet, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

online instructions for accessing the 

docket. 

Please note that even after the 

comment closing date, we will continue 

to file relevant information in the docket 

as it becomes available. Further, some 

people may submit late comments. 

Accordingly, we recommend that you 

periodically check the docket for new 

material. 

Issued on: April 19, 2012. 

John Maddox, 

Associate Administrator for Vehicle Safety 

Research. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9953 Filed 4–20–12; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF 

PEACE 

Call for Proposals for a Micro Support 

Program on International Conflict 

Resolution and Peacebuilding For 

Immediate Release 

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Micro Support Program on 

International Conflict Resolution and 

Peacebuilding. The United States 

Institute of Peace (USIP) requests 

proposals to develop and manage a new 

micro support initiative for projects 

undertaken at institutions of higher 

learning and public libraries in the 

United States. The program will require 

the contractor to design and implement 

a formal competition, review and 

recommend projects for funding, and 

provide financial and report 

management oversight. 

Deadline: Friday, May 11, 2012 at 3 

p.m. EDT. 

DATES: Response Deadline: Friday, May 

11, 2012 at 3 p.m. EDT 

April 16, 2012—Issue Request for 

Proposals 

May 11, 2012—RFP submissions due by 

3 p.m. 

May 14–25, 2012—Review submissions 

and selection of successful 

organization 

May 29, 2012—Announce results of 

selection process. 

ADDRESSES: United States Institute of 

Peace, 2301 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20037, (202) 429–3842 

(phone), (202) 833–1018 (fax), (202) 

457–1719 (TTY), Email: 

grants@usip.org. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Grant Program • Micro Support 

Program, Phone (202) 429–3842, Email: 

grants@usip.org. 

Dated: April 17, 2012. 

Michael Graham, 

Senior Vice President for Management. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9822 Filed 4–24–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–AR–P 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE IV

SOLIDARITY

SOLIDARITY

Article 34

Social security and social assistance

1.   The Union recognises and respects the entitlement to social security benefits and social services providing protection in cases such as maternity, illness, industrial accidents, dependency or old age, and in the case of loss of employment, in accordance with the rules laid down by Union law and national laws and practices.

2.   Everyone residing and moving legally within the European Union is entitled to social security benefits and social advantages in accordance with Union law and national laws and practices.

3.   In order to combat social exclusion and poverty, the Union recognises and respects the right to social and housing assistance so as to ensure a decent existence for all those who lack sufficient resources, in accordance with the rules laid down by Union law and national laws and practices.

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Commitment of J.S.T.

Appellate case number: 01-15-00075-CV

Trial court case number: 14-CV-1323

Trial court: 122nd Judicial District Court of Galveston County

On April 9, 2015, appellant, J.S.T., filed appellant’s brief, but it has not been 

posted online by the Clerk of this Court. It contains several references to the full name of 

the applicant, who is the subject of a commitment on application for extended 

management of a person with a communicable disease, in violation of Texas Health & 

Safety Code Annotated § 81.203 and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9(b) & (e) 

involving confidential or sensitive data. Pursuant to the January 21, 2015 notice of 

assignment letter, the records in this case shall be, and have been, filed as sealed. 

However, when briefs are filed in this Court, they are generally posted on our external 

website. Therefore, for the benefit of all counsel, the Court clarifies that it is imperative 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 be strictly complied with in all filings in this case.

The missing redactions can be found on pages 1-2, 6, 26, and 32-36 of the .pdf 

version of the brief, including the appendix. Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is 

directed to STRIKE the appellant’s brief and appellant’s counsel is ORDERED to refile 

an amended, redacted brief and appendix, using appellant’s initials in the brief and “Xs” 

in the appendix, within 10 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(k), 

9.9(c), 38.9(a). This order does not affect the deadline for appellee’s brief in this 

accelerated appeal, which remains April 29, 2015.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 16, 2015