alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Livestock 

Price Reporting

AMS Webinar

Neil Dierks, CEO

National Pork Producers Council
How did Mandatory Livestock Price Reporting 

come about?

• Evolution of how commerce is conducted in the swine 

industry

• Marketing of animals evolved from stockyards and auction 

markets to more packer direct sales of hogs by producers

• Evolved slowly after WWII and accelerated in the 1980’s

• To the point where volume of reported animals was low and all done on a 

voluntary basis

• The need for more transparency was apparent 
Background

• NPPC, together with beef and lamb interests, 

pursued what is known as the Livestock 

Reporting Act of 1999

• Pork elements of the Act:

• Mandatory Price Reporting for live swine 

• Swine Contract Library under Packers and Stockyards
Mandatory Swine and Pork Price Reporting

• Sought to have USDA Market News serve as a third party to provide 

information for the use of the entire industry, particularly producers

• The swine section was very prescriptive in terms of what and how the 

information was reported

• Act included the need for a reauthorization every 5 years

• This allows for needed changes to happen more rapidly

• Was designed to be a mirror as to what is happening in the marketplace

• Was not and is not a price discovery mechanism (does not establish 

prices although some may use it as a reference point in negotiations)
MPR

• Purchase data is Mandatory for any packer who on average 

harvests more than 100,000 head of swine in a year

• Reported to AMS at multiple times during the day

• AMS applies a high degree of confidentiality of raw data as well as takes 

great care in the different reports to not share data that could 

inadvertently indicate a given company’s position in the marketplace

• Data is published in a series of reports which will be touched upon 

during these webinars
Mandatory Swine and Pork Reporting

• Has been reauthorized since it was created (sometimes with short term extensions 

like now)

• Pork cuts were added to MPR in the 2010 reauthorization

• There have been short periods of time where reporting has been suspended during 

Government shutdowns (17 days was the longest)

• The data from reports has become second nature to the industry and used 

throughout for: 

• Producers selling pigs

• Packers buying pigs

• Customers buying pork

• Packers/processors selling pork

• The reports are used as a component in the CME lean index as well as other risk management 

products
Mandatory Swine and Pork Reporting

• Is unique in swine and pork industries in the world

• For the breadth and frequency of reports 

• A point I am often reminded of by my colleagues in other pork 

producing nations

• Offers information for decision makers throughout the industry

• AMS Livestock News Staff takes the responsibility for accuracy and 

confidentiality extremely seriously

• This set of webinars is a starting point for further understanding 

(and use) of these swine and pork reports
CAUSE NO. 1 057759-A IN THE COURT OF CRIMNAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

EXPARTE DARRYL WAYNE TAYLOR, Applicant 

### VS. THE 177 Th DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Respondent

## RfCIE~VE[] Bti¥1

## C~U~ CF

## CRUP,~J~IP;L APPEAtS 

## AUG 10 

## 2il15

APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

·Comes Now.applicant, in the above styled cause ofaction,. anQ. files this applicant's application for Writ ofMandamus pursuant to Article 1 section ofThe Texas Constitution, and The Texas Apt;t.Code ofCriminal Procedure Article 11:07 sec. 3 (d). And Will ShowThis CoUrt The Following: I. On July 6, 2009 applicant filed applicant's original application for writ ofhabeas corpus in the 177th district court ofHarris County, Texas. Applicant's application remained in the 177 th district court for (5) five years and (9) nine months before applicant received the State's Proposed Findings offacts and conclusions oflaw and order filed on April 15 2015. 

### ·II
.. It has been over (90) ninety days since the State has filed it's Proposed Findings OfFact 

## And· Conclusions OfLaw and the applicant's case has not been forwarded to this Court for review. The applicant's case has been pending in the 177th district court for over (6) six years in violation ofapplicant's rights under Article 1 section 10 ofthe Texas Constitution, apd the 14 th Amendment ofThe United States Constitution, due course, and due process, and the .equal protection of,the-law; and The Texas 

## J\nn
..**~oq~.** ofCr:itp.inal Procedure Article 11:07**se9t~on** 

### J. (d).
. '
. '
. . . . . '

.· '· ,. '

.j '
...



### III. This Court after review ofthe above facts should grant leave ofmandamus, and said case be forwarded to this court for review so that applicant can exercise all rights due the applicant, inwhich applicant has been denied.

PRAYER WHEREFORE, PREMISES, APPLICANT PRAYES THAT THIS COURT AFTER HAVING HEARD THE ISSUES PRESENTED IN THIS APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS BE GRANTED.**Respectful~ Sub~tted,**  

## !/,.. A 

### J1;)))>-t;L 

# 1<1.**~,-«Y[** DECLARATION OF OATH The foregoing instrument is true and correct to the best ofApplicant's knowledge U)lder the penalties ofperjury. Signed On This The 

## 5 day ofAugust, 2015.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                               1,386
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          707
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         11,157
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    15,207
<PP&E>                                              18,226
<DEPRECIATION>                                       7,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      28,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               20,107
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                2,171
<PREFERRED>                                          5,280
<COMMON>                                            22,722
<OTHER-SE>                                          16,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        28,172
<SALES>                                             15,291
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    15,291
<CGS>                                                9,015
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       21,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (4,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (4,687)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (4,687)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.86)



</TABLE>
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SEVEN

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 345

(ex Article 295 TEC)

(ex Article 295 TEC)

The Treaties shall in no way prejudice the rules in Member States governing the system of property ownership.

---
!"

 	
	
	 		
				 	

	

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	


	
						
					 	


	
				
		!	"					
#	

 $		
				
	
								

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	  	 	 	 	 	

	
		
		%		

					!	

 Model Year: 2007 

 Model: Range Rover 4.4L V8 naturally aspirated 

 Test Group: 7LRXT04.2001 

 VIN Range: SALMF15457A233807 - SALMF154X7A263532 

Total Vehicles: 5158 


 !"	#	!

& $	 	 
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	

'													

	


			
!	

$
%&%''(')!


 !"	#	!

( $		
			
			
						

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	 	 	


!	

*+%',+!*!-./

'
&''&),!

) $		
						
	
				
	

	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 *	 
	 	


		
		
						
		
	

		%	
										
		

!	

)('!

 $		 
	 		 		 
	
		 	 	 	 	 	

	
		

!	"				
					
	

						

				
	
	

	
				
		
				
	
			

	
			!	

,&0

'

%%%!

EPA VERR# 4220 

Received: April 29, 2011
	

     

	

		

+ ,
				
		
								
		

				-	
		
		
			


	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 -	 
	 	 
	 	


			
		
!	

0%&)
')(*+%!

. "		
			
	
								!	

 

1
(&''!

/ $		 
	 	 
	
		 	
		 	 	 	 %	


	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	

			
			%	
	
						 	

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 %	 
	 	 	

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

										
			%		

			!	


0%!

0 "	 	 
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	


						!	

 !"	#	!

1$		
			
					
		
	

	

	
				
	
						!	

'
'(%)((!



$		
	
														


		!	

 

 

EPA VERR# 4220 

Received: April 29, 2011
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1412 

To require the national instant criminal background check system to notify 

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the relevant State 

and local law enforcement agencies whenever the information available 

to the system indicates that a person illegally or unlawfully in the 

United States may be attempting to receive a firearm. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2019 

Mr. STEUBE (for himself, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. CLINE, 

Mr. BIGGS, Mr. BUCK, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, and Mr. GOHMERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the national instant criminal background check 

system to notify U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the relevant State and local law enforcement 

agencies whenever the information available to the system indicates that a person illegally or unlawfully in 

the United States may be attempting to receive a firearm. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1412 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Illegal Alien NICS 

3 Alert Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT THAT NICS NOTIFY ICE AND STATE 

5 AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES 

6 OF ATTEMPTED RECEIPT OF FIREARM BY 

7 PERSON ILLEGALLY OR UNLAWFULLY IN THE 

8 UNITED STATES. 

9 Section 103(e) of the Brady Handgun Violence Pre10 vention Act (34 U.S.C. 40901(e)) is amended by adding 

11 at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(3) REQUIREMENT TO NOTIFY ICE AND STATE

13 AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF AT14 TEMPTED RECEIPT OF FIREARM BY PERSON ILLE15 GALLY OR UNLAWFULLY IN THE UNITED STATES.— 

16 The Attorney General shall ensure that, whenever 

17 the information available to the system established 

18 under this section indicates that a prospective fire19 arm transferee is illegally or unlawfully in the 

20 United States, the system shall transmit to the Im21 migration and Customs Enforcement Agency and to 

22 relevant State and local law enforcement agencies a 

23 notice that the person may have attempted to receive 

24 a firearm in violation of section 922(g)(5) of title 

25 18, United States Code, and shall include with the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1412 IH

1 notice all relevant information possessed by the sys2 tem.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 32(ii)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Camco Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark A. Severson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                                     /s/ Mark A. Severson
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Mark A. Severson
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           395,023
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           10,659
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             10,689
<EQUITIES>                                      63,468
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 469,150
<CASH>                                          24,273
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 632,314
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             49,202
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 228,571
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 44,888
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   632,314
<PREMIUMS>                                     786,929
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             22,578
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               9,033
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  21,232
<BENEFITS>                                     650,449
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           162,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,951
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,173
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,778
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,778
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016202EN.01002101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/21

---

Article 11

1.   The institutions shall, by appropriate means, give citizens and representative associations the opportunity to make known and publicly exchange their views in all areas of Union action.

2.   The institutions shall maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with representative associations and civil society.

3.   The European Commission shall carry out broad consultations with parties concerned in order to ensure that the Union's actions are coherent and transparent.

4.   Not less than one million citizens who are nationals of a significant number of Member States may take the initiative of inviting the European Commission, within the framework of its powers, to submit any appropriate proposal on matters where citizens consider that a legal act of the Union is required for the purpose of implementing the Treaties.

The procedures and conditions required for such a citizens' initiative shall be determined in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 24 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Stiefermann, Mike" <mstiefermann@cepc.net>

Date: 7/22/2010 11:48 AM

Subject: Re: ICR Extension Request

Attachments: pic08672.gif

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the Central Electric Cooperative Chamois

facility. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the

completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. If you

need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic08672.gif)
#### John F. LEFTWICH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Jeanine F. LEFTWICH, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 14220.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 23, 1976.

*448E. H. Fankhauser, of Cotro-Manes, Warr, Fankhauser & Beasley, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Ray H. Ivie, of Ivie, Young & Stott, Provo, for defendant and respondent.

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a judgment in a divorce case, where after an amendment in the pleadings and proof reducing the amount of a previous award, and favoring appellant in such amendment with respect to property and money payments, he nonetheless appealed. Affirmed with no costs on appeal assessed.

The parties married in 1950. About seven months later came their first child. A divorce followed in April 1952, followed by another child in July 1952, followed by a resumption, without benefit of marriage, of the bed and board bit, followed by the purchase jointly of a home, followed by another child in November 1954, followed by a marriage ceremony in 1956, followed by recording of the deed to the house as husband and wife, who were not that at the time of the purchase, after which another child was born in 1961. Three and a half years later they separated and Mr. L. sued for a divorce, and Mrs. L. countered, won, got a property and alimony award. Mr. L. now says: 1) The decree was inequitable, 2) exceeds the sort of dowered theory of one-third to the woman and two-thirds to the man syndrome, and 3) anyway the decree otherwise was inequitable.

The one-third, two-third computer complex seems to be the thrust of this case. The computer may be accurate mathematically, but this court has a different set of logarithms. The decision of the trial judge, — who was malleable enough to soothe the pain somewhat of Mr. L., appellant, — by reducing the amount of the award on the latter’s motion, but which did not comport to, but exceeded the one-third, two-third number we think was correct. This does not distiguish such philosophy to such a degree as to overrule our previous pronouncements to the contrary.

An examination of this record constrains us to sustain the trial court and to say that the evidence, looked at favorably to respondent, reflects neither violence to the factual atmosphere nor abrasive judicial wisdom.

ELLETT, CROCKETT, TUCKETT and MAUGHAN, JJ., concur.
#  Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (the “Act”), as amended, (22 U.S.C. 2601(c)(1)), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is important to the national interest to furnish assistance under the Act, in an amount not to exceed $26 million from the United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund, for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs, including by contributions to international, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and payment of administrative expenses of the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department of State, related to the humanitarian crisis resulting from conflict in South Kordofan and Blue Nile States of Sudan.

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2012-8674

Billing code 4710-10-P
# EUR-Lex - 12012M011 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M011

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE II: PROVISIONS ON DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES - Article 11 **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0021 - 0021 *

Article 111. The institutions shall, by appropriate means, give citizens and representative associations the opportunity to make known and publicly exchange their views in all areas of Union action.

2. The institutions shall maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with representative associations and civil society.

3. The European Commission shall carry out broad consultations with parties concerned in order to ensure that the Union's actions are coherent and transparent.

4. Not less than one million citizens who are nationals of a significant number of Member States may take the initiative of inviting the European Commission, within the framework of its powers, to submit any appropriate proposal on matters where citizens consider that a legal act of the Union is required for the purpose of implementing the Treaties.

The procedures and conditions required for such a citizens' initiative shall be determined in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 24 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

--------------------------------------------------