alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1267 

To designate a mountain ridge in the State of Montana as ‘‘B–47 Ridge’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. GIANFORTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate a mountain ridge in the State of Montana 

as ‘‘B–47 Ridge’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘B–47 Ridge Designa5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF B–47 RIDGE, MONTANA. 

7 (a) DESIGNATION.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—The unnamed mountain 

9 ridge located at 45°14′40.89′′N, 110°43′38.75′′W 

10 that runs south and west of Emigrant Peak in the 

11 Absaroka Range in the State of Montana, which is 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1267 IH

1 the approximate site of a crash of a B–47, shall be 

2 known and designated as ‘‘B–47 Ridge’’. 

3 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, 

4 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 

5 the United States to the ridge described in para6 graph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to ‘‘B– 

7 47 Ridge’’. 

8 (b) AUTHORIZATION FOR PLAQUE.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—A plaque that memorializes 

10 the crash of the B–47 (including denoting the names 

11 of the victims of the crash) may be installed on B– 

12 47 Ridge. 

13 (2) FUNDING.—No Federal funds may be used 

14 to design, procure, install, or maintain the plaque 

15 authorized under paragraph (1). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
MELLONYARIAIL, RMR, CRR, CBC

Official Court Reporter ♦ 431st District Court 

1450 E. McKinney Street, Denton, Texas 76209 

940.349.4372 (office) ◊ 940.349.5373 (fax) 

mellony.ariail@dentoncounty.com 

April 17, 2015 

Re: Court of Appeals No. 02-15-00119-CV 

 City of Carrollton, Texas 

v. 

Milan Hamrla, Petra Chudejova, Michael and Laura Brewer and Dalia Chavarria 

I, Mellony Ariail, Official Court Reporter for the 431st District Court, am unable to file the 

reporter’s record in the above styled case for the following reason(s): 

[ ] Appellant has not submitted a request for preparation and/or a written 

designation for the record. 

[ X ] Appellant has made payment arrangements, but I have not yet received payment. 

[ ] Appellant has only made a partial payment for the record. 

[ ] Appellant has made required payment and has filed a written designation, but due 

to my case load, I have been unable to complete the record. 

[ X ] Other, as specified herein: The Reporter’s Record in this case is very technical and 

I will need at least 10 days to complete and file the record after payment is 

received. 

 

 

Sincerely, 

/s/ Mellony K. Ariail, CSR No. 3729 

 FILED IN 2nd COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 04/17/2015 12:33:59 PM DEBRA SPISAK Clerk
The Meat and Poultry Inspection 

Readiness Grant (MPIRG)

Who it's for: Meat and poultry facilities currently in operation 

who would like to sell product across state lines, or those looking 

to improve market reach and efficiency.

Is your meat or poultry processing 

facility currently operational? NO

Not 

eligible for 

MPIRG.

YES

You may be eligible for MPIRG.

Are you seeking to obtain a 

Federal Grant of Inspection?*

* Custom-exempt meat or poultry processing facilities currently in operation may be eligible for MPIRG.

NO

Not 

eligible for 

MPIRG.

YES

You are eligible 

for an MPIRG

“Planning for a 

Federal Grant of 

Inspection” 

Project.

Do you have a State-inspected 

facility and do you want to be eligible 

for Federal inspection under the 

FSIS Cooperative Interstate 

Shipment (CIS) Program?

*

** Custom-exempt meat or poultry processing 

facilities currently in operation may be eligible 

for MPIRG. 

NO

Not 

eligible for 

MPIRG.

YES

You may be eligible 

for an MPIRG

“CIS Compliance” 

Project.

Is your processing facility located 

in a state approved under the 

FSIS CIS Program?

NO

Not 

eligible for 

MPIRG.

YES

You are eligible

for an MPIRG

“CIS Compliance” 

Project.

OMB No. 0581-0324
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350



(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick J. Caruso, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: January 19, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    NICK J. CARUSO                                              
|                       |  |     |  | Nick J. Caruso Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynegy Inc. and will be retained by Dynegy Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Call from Fred Sciance, GM May 14, 2010 To: Margaret Sheppard, EPA 313
- 665
- 2962 Genesis of Alliance comments on SNUR. Chry sler said, §609 certification goes bey ond what OEMs currentl y do. Mr. Sciance noted that there will be new OSHA requirements with flammable materials, so staff will be aware of difference and will get training. Can there be different §609 requirements for OEMs? He had advised Giedrus Ambroziatus at the Alliance to submit it as a late comment on the SNAP rule.
July 23, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CONNOR R. BLAND, Appellant

NO. 14-12-01057-CV V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Texas 

Department of Public Safety, signed September 24, 2012, was heard on the 

transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the 

judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED. We order 

appellant Connor R. Bland to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further 

order this decision certified below for observance.
Federal Financial Report

(Follow form Instructions)

OMB Number: 4040-0014

Expiration Date: 02/28/2022

1. Federal Agency and Organizational Element to Which Report is Submitted 2. Federal Grant or Other Identifying Number Assigned by Federal

Agency (To report multiple grants, use FFR Attachment)

3. Recipient Organization (Name and complete address including Zip code)

Recipient Organization Name:

Street1:

Street2:

City: County:

State: Province:

Country: ZIP / Postal Code:

4a. DUNS Number 4b. EIN 5. Recipient Account Number or Identifying Number

(To report multiple grants, use FFR Attachment)

6. Report Type

Quarterly

Semi-Annual

Annual

Final

7. Basis of Accounting

Cash

Accrual

8. Project/Grant Period

From: To:

9. Reporting Period End Date

10. Transactions Cumulative

(Use lines a-c for single or multiple grant reporting)

Federal Cash (To report multiple grants, also use FFR attachment):

a. Cash Receipts

b. Cash Disbursements

c. Cash on Hand (line a minus b)

(Use lines d-o for single grant reporting)

Federal Expenditures and Unobligated Balance:

d. Total Federal funds authorized

e. Federal share of expenditures

f. Federal share of unliquidated obligations

g. Total Federal share (sum of lines e and f)

h. Unobligated balance of Federal Funds (line d minus g)

Recipient Share:

i. Total recipient share required

j. Recipient share of expenditures

k. Remaining recipient share to be provided (line i minus j)

Program Income:

l. Total Federal program income earned

m. Program Income expended in accordance with the deduction alternative

n. Program Income expended in accordance with the addition alternative

o. Unexpended program income (line l minus line m or line n)
11. Indirect Expense

a. Type b. Rate c. Period From Period To d. Base e. Amount f. Federal Share

Charged

g. Totals:

12. Remarks: Attach any explanations deemed necessary or information required by Federal sponsoring agency in compliance with governing legislation:

Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment

13. Certification: By signing this report, I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report is true, complete, and accurate, and the

expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the purposes and objectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the Federal award. I

am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil or

administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, false claims or otherwise. (U.S. Code Title 18, Section 1001 and Title 31, Sections 3729-3730

and 3801-3812).

a. Name and Title of Authorized Certifying Official

Prefix: First Name: Middle Name:

Last Name: Suffix:

Title:

b. Signature of Authorized Certifying Official c. Telephone (Area code, number and extension)

d. Email Address e. Date Report Submitted 14. Agency use only:

Standard Form 425
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 19 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to allow 

Congress to limit the number of terms that Representatives and Senators 

may serve. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. NORMAN submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to allow Congress to limit the number of terms 

that Representatives and Senators may serve. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 19 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘Congress may by law limit the number of terms that 

3 Representatives and Senators may serve.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2016

p0922 

# Order

Clerk September 29, 2016

150972

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150972

COA: 324234

Roscommon CC: 14

- 007041

- FH

ROBERT ALLEN BAKER a/k/a

JOHN FRANCIS CAVERLY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 8, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is co nsidered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Roscommon Circuit Court for

consideration of the defendant’s issue regarding the assessment of court costs. On

remand, because the trial court deter mined that it would not take the challenged

information in the PSIR into account at sentencing, the trial court shall also direct the

probation officer to delete the challenged information from the PSIR as required by

MCR 6.425(E)(2)(a) and assure that a c orrected copy of the report is prepared and

transmitted to the Michigan Department of Corrections per MCR 6.425 and

MCL 771.14(6). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Medical Security
Group, Inc. (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Samuel V. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/Samuel V. Miller
--------------------------------------------
Samuel V. Miller, Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2002



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1421 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1421

To repeal debt collection amendments made by the Bipartisan Budget Act 
                    of 2015, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2019

 Ms. Eshoo (for herself, Mr. Cooper, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Khanna, Mr. 
   Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Case, and Mr. Raskin) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal debt collection amendments made by the Bipartisan Budget Act 
                    of 2015, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Help Americans Never Get Unwanted 
Phone calls Act of 2019'' or the ``HANGUP Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DEBT COLLECTION AMENDMENTS; CLARIFYING COVERAGE WITH 
              RESPECT TO GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS.

    (a) In General.--The Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et 
seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 3, by striking paragraph (39) and inserting 
        the following:
            ``(39) Person.--The term `person'--
                    ``(A) includes an individual, partnership, 
                association, joint-stock company, trust, or 
                corporation; and
                    ``(B) for the purposes of section 227, includes a 
                contractor of the United States Government with respect 
                to a call that is made solely to collect a debt owed to 
                or guaranteed by the United States.''; and
            (2) in section 227(b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) in subparagraph (A)(iii), by striking 
                        ``, unless such call is made solely to collect 
                        a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United 
                        States''; and
                            (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``, 
                        is made solely pursuant to the collection of a 
                        debt owed to or guaranteed by the United 
                        States,''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)--
                            (i) in subparagraph (F)(ii), by adding 
                        ``and'' at the end;
                            (ii) in subparagraph (G)(ii), by striking 
                        ``; and'' at the end and inserting a period; 
                        and
                            (iii) by striking subparagraph (H).
    (b) Regulations.--Section 301(b) of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 
2015 (47 U.S.C. 227 note; Public Law 114-74) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
FW: presentation

MOORE Beth t

o

: Jordan Page 02/16/2010 01:07 PM

Cc: "FULTS Janet E", "MASTERSON Kevin"

From: "MOORE Beth" <MOORE.Beth@deq.state.or.us>

To: Jordan Page/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "FULTS Janet E" <Janet.E.Fults@state.or.us>, "MASTERSON Kevin"

<MASTERSON.Kevin@deq.state.or.us>

Jordon. More Pesticide data. Let me know if you have questions.

Beth Moore

General Permits Coordinator

DEQ WQ-Surface Water Management

Phone: (503) 229-6402

Fax: (503) 229-6037

From: MASTERSON Kevin

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 11:14 A M

To: MOORE Beth

Cc: KISHIDA Koto

Subject: presentation

Beth,

As per our discussion, see Diuron detections toward the end of the presentation. There were 46 detects

(most of any of the 100+ we looked for), and one of the local chemical distributors told me it was being

used as an aquatic herbicide in the “distributaries” that course through the orchard areas where we

were monitoring.

Kevin
# C_2016203EN.01002001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/20

---

Article 35

Each Member State shall establish the facilities necessary to carry out continuous monitoring of the level of radioactivity in the air, water and soil and to ensure compliance with the basic standards.

The Commission shall have the right of access to such facilities; it may verify their operation and efficiency.

---
State Department of Agriculture

Division: 

Phone: 

Email:

MEMORANDUM

TO: 

FROM:

DATE: 

RE:

Joey Yonce; Grants Specialist, SPRS Block Grant Program

Tom Jones; Director, Agriculture Administration

April 15, 2022

Request to Amend the Budget for AMS Agreement (insert number)

The State Department of Agriculture (insert your Department) would like to amend the 

projectentitled the Seafood Processors Pandemic Response and Safety (SPRS) Block Grant 

Program in AMS Agreement (insert number). Please see the detail below that describes the 

reason and extent of the changes to the project:

JUSTIFICATION: 

Upon execution of the project entitled the Seafood Processors Pandemic Response and 

Safety (SPRS) Block Grant Program in AMS Agreement, the Department’s staff realized that 

funds in the amount of (insert amount) had not been properly categorized. This is due to 

financial efficiencies found within the project that saved money while maintaining the 

continuity of the project. This is (insert percentage) of this project’s budget of (insert 

amount). The Department has worked to determine the best usage of these funds. As a 

result of this effort, the Department requests to redirect these funds to the (insert approved 

category for project from Project Narrative).

DESCRIPTION: 

With the additional funding of (insert amount) in this new category, the Department plans to 

(provide justification/rationale for funds transfer and benefit of change).
Specifically, the additional funds will be used as follows (example):

Cost Category Original Amended

Supplies

Contractual

Other

$ 17,800

5,000

0

$ 14,557

5,000

3,243

Total SPRS Funds: $ 22,800 $ 22,800

Other ($3,243.00)

(Provide detailed information for activities and amounts for the total requested change)

If you have any questions concerning this requested amendment, please feel free to contact

me. If necessary, I will be more than happy to discuss and ratify this request to ensure that it

meets the requirements of the Seafood Processors Pandemic Response and Safety (SPRS) 

Block Grant Program.

Sincerely,

Autorized Respresentative
EXHIBIT 31(iii)

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, James E. Huston, certify that



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Camco Financial Corporation; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                       
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: July 13, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ James E. Huston                                                   
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | James E. Huston, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)