alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1051 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1051

   To amend section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, to require 
 payment of interest on back pay for employees affected by a lapse in 
                            appropriations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2019

 Ms. Sewell of Alabama (for herself, Mr. Ruppersberger, Ms. Moore, and 
 Mr. Raskin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, to require 
 payment of interest on back pay for employees affected by a lapse in 
                            appropriations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Back Pay Fairness Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INTEREST ON BACK PAY FOR EMPLOYEES AFFECTED BY A LAPSE IN 
              APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1341(c) of title 31, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
    ``(3)(A) If a payment under paragraph (2) to an employee furloughed 
as a result of a covered lapse in appropriations or to an excepted 
employee is made after the regularly scheduled pay date for such 
payment in the absence of a lapse in appropriations, the payment shall 
include an interest payment prorated daily which shall accrue from such 
regularly scheduled pay date.
    ``(B) An interest payment under subparagraph (A)--
            ``(i) shall be computed at the rate of interest established 
        by the Secretary of the Treasury under section 3902 that is in 
        effect on the first day of the covered lapse in appropriations; 
        and
            ``(ii) shall be in addition to any other remedy available 
        under any other law, rule, or regulation.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by this section shall apply 
with respect to any covered lapse in appropriations (as defined in 
section 1341(c) of title 31, United States Code) that begins before, 
on, or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE III

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

Article 31

1.   A Schengen Facility (hereinafter referred to as ‘the temporary Schengen Facility’) is hereby created as a temporary instrument to help Croatia between the date of accession and the end of 2014 to finance actions at the new external borders of the Union for the implementation of the Schengen acquis and external border control.

acquis

2.   For the period 1 July 2013 to 31 December 2014, the following amounts (current prices) shall be made available to Croatia in the form of lump-sum payments under the temporary Schengen Facility:

| (million EUR, current prices) |
| --- |
| | 2013 | 2014 |
| Croatia | 40 | 80 |

(million EUR, current prices)

2013

2014

Croatia

40

80

3.   The annual amount for 2013 shall be payable to Croatia on 1 July 2013 and the annual amount for 2014 shall be made available on the first working day after 1 January 2014.

4.   The lump-sum payments shall be used within three years from the first payment. Croatia shall submit, no later than six months after expiry of this three-year period, a comprehensive report on the final execution of the payments under the temporary Schengen Facility with a statement justifying the expenditure. Any unused or unjustifiably spent funds shall be recovered by the Commission.

5.   The Commission may adopt any technical provisions necessary for the operation of the temporary Schengen Facility.

---
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

November 17, 2023

CR-2022-1355

Jessie James Sharp v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: 

CC-07-938.63) 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on November 17, 2023, the following action was 

taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cagle's, Inc. for the year ended April 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagle's, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  
1. The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) 
   of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and  
2. The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material 
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date:  June 24, 2004           

By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle   

J. Douglas Cagle                     

Chief Executive Officer                      
. 
. 
. 
. 
. 
. 
. 
. 
. 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cagle's, Inc. for the year ended April 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of  Cagle's, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  
1. The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) 
   of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and  
2. The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material 
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date:  June 24, 2004           

By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV          

Mark M. Ham IV                                

Chief Financial Officer                               
.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF LAMAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 18th 

day of February, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Michael Earitt White, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-13-00110-CR

Trial Court No. 60286

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was error in the judgment of 

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and render a judgment of 

acquittal.

We further order that the appellee, The State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 16th day of April, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
Badlands - Worst - Total Extinction Badlands - Worst - SO4 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

SO4

Extinction

BADL1 NIA 2000 19 63.49 BADL1 NIA 2000 19 18.99

BADL1 NIA 2001 24 59.32 BADL1 NIA 2001 24 23.25

BADL1 NIA 2002 23 51.28 BADL1 NIA 2002 23 17.43

BADL1 NIA 2003 24 61.53 BADL1 NIA 2003 24 16.19

BADL1 NIA 2004 25 50.25 BADL1 NIA 2004 25 18.4

285.87 Total 94.26 Total

57.174 Average 18.852 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Sulfate Share of Particle Light Extinction 33%

Badlands - Best - Total Extinction Badlands - Best - SO4 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

SO4

Extinction

BADL1 NIA 2000 18 21.09 BADL1 NIA 2000 18 4.33

BADL1 NIA 2001 24 21.15 BADL1 NIA 2001 24 3.85

BADL1 NIA 2002 23 19.58 BADL1 NIA 2002 23 2.57

BADL1 NIA 2003 23 18.81 BADL1 NIA 2003 23 3.03

BADL1 NIA 2004 24 19.44 BADL1 NIA 2004 24 3.01

100.07 Total 16.79 Total

20.014 Average 3.358 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Sulfate Share of Particle Light Extinction 17%

Wind Cave - Worst - Total Extinction Wind Cave - Worst - SO4 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

SO4

Extinction

WICA1 NIA 2000 19 51.94 WICA1 NIA 2000 19 11.6

WICA1 NIA 2001 20 48.09 WICA1 NIA 2001 20 14.32

WICA1 NIA 2002 24 55.29 WICA1 NIA 2002 24 14.66

WICA1 NIA 2003 24 51.05 WICA1 NIA 2003 24 12.66

WICA1 NIA 2004 25 47.32 WICA1 NIA 2004 25 12.78

253.69 Total 66.02 Total

50.738 Average 13.204 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Sulfate Share of Particle Light Extinction 26%

Wind Cave - Best - Total Extinction Wind Cave - Best - SO4 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

SO4

Extinction

WICA1 NIA 2000 18 17.59 WICA1 NIA 2000 18 3.05

WICA1 NIA 2001 19 16.75 WICA1 NIA 2001 19 2.65

WICA1 NIA 2002 23 16.95 WICA1 NIA 2002 23 2.27

WICA1 NIA 2003 23 16.5 WICA1 NIA 2003 23 2.51

WICA1 NIA 2004 24 16.26 WICA1 NIA 2004 24 2.41

84.05 Total 12.89 Total

16.81 Average 2.578 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Sulfate Share of Particle Light Extinction 15%
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Walter Billigmeier, Respondent, v Cres Dry Wall et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

—Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 23, 1989, which, *inter alia,*ruled that the workers’ compensation insurance carrier was not entitled to credit for payments made in a previously closed workers’ compensation case.

The workers’ compensation insurance carrier contends that it is entitled to credit for those benefits received by claimant from a prior lump-sum settlement with a different carrier for an unrelated injury. The carrier argues that when the lump-sum settlement is allocated at a weekly rate of $105 and added to claimant’s present weekly benefits of $300, he is receiving benefits in excess of the statutory limit. However, claimant has never received more than $300 per week, the statutory limit (Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 [6] [a] [6]), because he received his entire lump-sum settlement for his unrelated injury before the accident in this case occurred. The allocation is done for the sole purpose of determining when the Special Fund for Reopened Cases would be liable if the case were to be reopened *(see,*Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a [1], [7]), a situation not involved here. The lump-sum payment is not to be viewed as an advance payment of *904benefits to be considered over an allocated period but, rather, a final payment that is separate from any periodic payments *(see, Matter of Newman v Public Oversight Bd.,*127 AD2d 302, 304, *lv denied*70 NY2d 606). Because no reason exists to permit the carrier to reduce its payments to claimant, the decision should be affirmed

Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board.
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00392-CR

CHANCE ROACH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 185th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1394753).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on April 

25, 2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible 

error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered April 16, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle. Opinion delivered by Justice 

Higley.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the amended report of Entrx Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter
L. Hauser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Brian D. Niebur,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  i.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andii.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Peter L. Hauser Peter L. Hauser
Chief Executive Officer
November 29, 2004 /s/ Brian D. Niebur Brian D. Niebur
Chief Financial Officer
November 29, 2004
The number one order of business is to reestablish the U.S. Cultivar and Seed Bank and grant Strain Hunters the International License and Permits to travel all over the world for the best varieties then grow 100% Pure Homegrown Hemp, the best in the world and CBD Oil for intractable epilepsy and pain.

Joel Hatchett
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000016343
<NAME> CALIFORNIA JOCKEY CLUB AND BAY MEADOWS OPERATING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,533
<SECURITIES>                                     6,758
<RECEIVABLES>                                      870
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (77)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,105
<PP&E>                                          39,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,967)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,793
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           116
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,694
<SALES>                                          2,205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,774
<CGS>                                              729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,099
<INCOME-TAX>                                       638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,461
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,461
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
cc: Eighth Judicial District Court, Dept. J 

DeAnn Justine Wiesner 

Daniel Allan Wiesner 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A ea'
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

6.   Declaration on Article 15(5) and (6), Article 17(6) and (7) and Article 18 of the Treaty on European Union

Declaration on Article 15(5) and (6), Article 17(6) and (7) and Article 18 of the Treaty on European Union

In choosing the persons called upon to hold the offices of President of the European Council, President of the Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, due account is to be taken of the need to respect the geographical and demographic diversity of the Union and its Member States.

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the    Registration Statement    No. 333-119300    on    Form S-8    pertaining to The Cato Corporation 2004 Incentive Compensation    Plan, in Registration Statement    No. 333-119299    pertaining to The Cato Corporation 2003 Employee Stock Purchase    Plan, Registration Statement    No. 333-96283    on    Form S-8    pertaining to The Cato Corporation 1999 Incentive Compensation    Plan, in Registration Statement    No. 33-41314    on    Form S-8    pertaining to The Cato Corporation 1987 Incentive Stock Option    Plan, in Registration Statement    No. 33-41315    on    Form S-8    pertaining to The Cato Corporation 1987 Nonqualified Stock    Option Plan, and in Registration Statements Nos.    33-69844 and    333-96285 on    Forms S-8    pertaining to The Cato Corporation 1993 Employee Stock Purchase    Plan, of our report dated April 11, 2006 relating to the    financial statements, financial statement schedule,    management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal    control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this    Form 10-K.     /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     Charlotte, North Carolina    April 11, 2006
CCA # 13-12-00605-CR

STYLE: MARIA ALMAGUER v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

TRIAL COURT: 93rd District Court

TRIAL COURTS: CR-217-09-B /

TRIAL COURTJUDGE: Hon. Rodolfo Delgado

DISPOSITION: VACATED IN PART and AFFIRMFD IN

PART

DATE:

JUSTICE: PC S X

PUBLISH: X

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APPBR:

DNP:

X

X

X

X

> .j

OFFENSE: Manslaughter

COUNTY: Hidalgo

SO

MOTION

FOR REHEARING WAS: DENIED

DATE: October 9. 2014

JUDGE: Gina M. Benavides

SUPP CLK RECORD

SUPP RPT RECORD

SUPP BR X_

PROSE BR

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

CCA#

rKO SE Petition Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW DATE: IN CCA IS:'

JUDGE:

DATE: /tf°>toh /If, ZZO/ST SIGNED: PC

JUDGE: J^CL PUBLISH: DNPMOTION FOR RFHFARIwr; |M MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

ON

JUDGE:

CCA IS: ON

JUDGE:

If %PI
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1347 

To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act to reauthorize 

the Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2019 

Mr. KIND (for himself and Mr. WITTMAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act 

to reauthorize the Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Migratory Birds of 

5 the Americas Conservation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY 

7 BIRD CONSERVATION ACT. 

8 Section 10 of the Neotropical Migratory Bird Con9 servation Act (16 U.S.C. 6109) is amended to read as fol10 lows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1347 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 10. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appro3 priated to carry out this Act $6,500,000 for each of fiscal 

4 years 2020 through 2025. 

5 ‘‘(b) USE OF FUNDS.—Of the amounts made avail6 able under subsection (a) for each fiscal year, not less than 

7 75 percent shall be expended for projects carried out at 

8 a location outside of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Plant Variety Protection - 25 Certificates Issued on March 22, 2023

APPLICATION 

NUMBER

VARIETY NAME CROP APPLICANT / OWNER *CERTIFIED 

SEED ONLY?

202000376 5PNDZ41 Soybean Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000377 5PUZE63 Soybean Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000378 5PRQV49 Soybean Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000379 5PRGU65 Soybean Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202000380 5PZVJ20 Soybean Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. No

202100041 IPG 3628 Peanut International Peanut Group LLC Yes

202100227 Columbia Kintoki Field Bean Pro-Set Seed Company No

202100347 Tamcot 73 Cotton Texas A&M Agrilife Research Yes

202100357 Midnight Roma Tomato Oregon State University No

202100358 Crop77 Potato The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited No

202100359 USDA Diamondback Bean The United States Government as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture Yes

202100378 F0281Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100379 R1580Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100380 T3705Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100381 T3985Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100382 T0383Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100383 R7153Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100384 T0190Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100385 A9959Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100386 F5830Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100387 T6314Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100388 F8300Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100389 F3160Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100400 F1380Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

202100401 A7940Z Corn Monsanto Technology, LLC No

* Certified seed - seed which has been determined by an official seed certifying agency to conform to standards of genetic purity and identity as to variety, 

which standards have been approved by the Secretary.

USDA, AMS, Science and Technology, Plant Variety Protection Office (202) 260-8983 Page 1 of 1