alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 6

SECTION 6

THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

Article 282

1.   The European Central Bank, together with the national central banks, shall constitute the European System of Central Banks (ESCB). The European Central Bank, together with the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro, which constitute the Eurosystem, shall conduct the monetary policy of the Union.

2.   The ESCB shall be governed by the decision-making bodies of the European Central Bank. The primary objective of the ESCB shall be to maintain price stability. Without prejudice to that objective, it shall support the general economic policies in the Union in order to contribute to the achievement of the latter's objectives.

3.   The European Central Bank shall have legal personality. It alone may authorise the issue of the euro. It shall be independent in the exercise of its powers and in the management of its finances. Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and the governments of the Member States shall respect that independence.

4.   The European Central Bank shall adopt such measures as are necessary to carry out its tasks in accordance with Articles 127 to 133, with Article 138, and with the conditions laid down in the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB. In accordance with these same Articles, those Member States whose currency is not the euro, and their central banks, shall retain their powers in monetary matters.

5.   Within the areas falling within its responsibilities, the European Central Bank shall be consulted on all proposed Union acts, and all proposals for regulation at national level, and may give an opinion.

---
* After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submi tted on the briefs and the record. See F ED . R. A PP . P. 34(a)(2)(C). 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted November 23, 2010 * Decided December 1, 2010 Before MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge No. 09-2070 SHONE FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. TAMMY POWELL, Defendant-Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. No. 07-3155 Harold A. Baker, Judge O R D E R In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Shone Foster claims that Tammy Powell, a shift commander at the Sangamon County Detention Facility, violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments by threatening him while he was inpretrial detention. Foster had asked why the jail was on lockdown, and Powell scoffed, “T op Secret, if I told you, I’d have to kill you.” Foster says this expression was not jest and that he feared for his life. And he grew more anxious, he continues, after filing a gr ievance and being confronted by Powell, who accused him of trying to ruin her career an d warned that she could make his stay “very uncomfortable” if he did not “back off.” Fost er did not relent but instead named Powell in NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 09-2070 Page 2 a second grievance. After that he had no fu rther contact with her and suffered no adverse action at the jail. At screening, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the district court allowed Foster’s retaliation theory to proceed, but later the court dismisse d the suit because Foster had not updated his mailing address upon being releas ed from jail. At Foster’s urging, however, the court reconsidered that ruling and reinstated the su it. The court then granted summary judgment for Powell on the ground that her isolated comments, uncoupled from any adverse action, could not have deterred a reasonab le person from exercising hi s First Amendment rights. On appeal Foster primarily challenges the rescinded procedural dismissal, but we construe his pro se filings to contest also the grant of summary judgment for Powell. See Anderson v. Hardman , 241 F.3d 544, 545 (7th Cir. 2001). Even so, the district court properly decided that, as a matter of law, Powell’s remarks could not have deterred a reasonable person from exercising hi s First Amendment rights. See Bridges v. Gilbert , 557 F.3d 541, 552 (7th Cir. 2009); Bart v. Telford , 677 F.2d 622, 625 (7th Cir. 1982); Thaddeus-X v. Blatter , 175 F.3d 378, 398 (6th Cir. 1999). Indeed Foster’s own conduct makes this point evident, since his immediate reaction to both conversations with Powell was to file a grievance. And there is no evidence that he suffered an adverse acti on while confined, i.e., discipline, altered conditions of confinement, loss of priv ileges, reassignment, or otherwise. AFFIRMED.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1365 

AN ACT 

To make technical corrections to the Guam World War II 

Loyalty Recognition Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1365 EH

1 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO GUAM WORLD 

2 WAR II LOYALTY RECOGNITION ACT. 

3 Title XVII of division A of Public Law 114–328 is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in section 1703(e)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘equal to’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘not to exceed’’; and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘covered into the Treasury 

9 as miscellaneous receipts’’ and inserting ‘‘used 

10 to reimburse the applicable appropriations’’; 

11 (2) in section 1704(a) by striking ‘‘, subject to 

12 the availability of appropriations,’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘from the Claims Fund’’; and 

14 (3) by striking section 1707(a). 

15 SEC. 2. BUDGETARY TREATMENT OF TECHNICAL AMEND16 MENTS. 

17 (a) DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.—As 

18 the budgetary effects for spending provided by this Act 

19 were estimated and offset as part of the enactment of the 

20 Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition Act (title XVII 

21 of division A of Public Law 114–328), the budgetary ef22 fects of this Act shall be determined as if the amendments 

23 made by this Act were included in the enactment of the 

24 Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition Act (title XVII 

25 of division A of Public Law 114–328), for purposes of the 
3 

•HR 1365 EH

1 Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and the Statutory Pay2 As-You-Go Act of 2010. 

3 (b) PAY-AS-YOU-GO COMPLIANCE.—The budgetary 

4 effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the 

5 Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be deter6 mined by reference to the latest statement titled ‘‘Budg7 etary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, sub8 mitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the 

9 Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 

10 such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on 

11 passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1365 

AN ACT 

To make technical corrections to the Guam World 

War II Loyalty Recognition Act.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LABORERS’ INTERNATIONAL

UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL

UNION NO. 783; et al.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

 v.

HOLLAND & HART, LLP, Counsel for

Defendants; et al.,

Appellants,

 v.

MAMMOTH PACIFIC, LP, a California

Limited Partnership; et al.,

Defendants.

No. 17-15209

D.C. No. 

2:14-cv-01612-MCE-KJN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

FILED

MAR 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Submitted March 16, 2018** 

San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and ADELMAN,***

 District Judge.

Mammoth Pacific LP and Holland & Hart LLP appeal the district court’s

decision imposing sanctions in the amount of $1,500. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

To the extent the district court based its decision to sanction defendants on

the grounds that their filings were frivolous and violated the court’s warning not to

use footnotes to avoid page limits, the district court did not abuse its discretion. 

See Zambrano v. City of Tustin, 885 F.2d 1473, 1477, 1484 (9th Cir. 1989). But to

the extent the district court based its decision on the ground that the defendants’

filings exceeded the page limits set by the Pretrial Scheduling Order, it was clearly

erroneous. The court failed to recognize that it had set different page limits in its

subsequent October 4, 2016 order (30 pages for dispositive motions and responses,

15 for replies), which were not violated by the defendants’ 29-page summary

judgment motion, and 30-page response. (The 19-page reply brief did exceed the

page limit set by the October 4th order.) Because the district court clearly erred in

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Lynn S. Adelman, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation.

2
disregarding its October 4th order, we vacate and remand for a determination of

whether sanctions are appropriate in light of the correct page limits. Each party

will bear its own costs on appeal. 

VACATED AND REMANDED.

3
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-16,087-39

EX PARTE JAMES EDWARD LEWIS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 867453-H IN THE 232nd DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unauthorized use

of a motor vehicle and sentenced to 15 years years’ imprisonment.

In his present application, Applicant raises five grounds. This application, however, presents

a more serious question. This Court’s records reflect that Applicant has filed six prior applications

pertaining to this conviction. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to raise issues

that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been presented
2

in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders

v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Because of his

repetitive claims, we hold that Applicant’s claims are barred from review under Article 11.07, § 4,

and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. This application is dismissed.

Therefore, we instruct the Honorable Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals,

not to accept or file the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application

pertaining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims

presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous

application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).

Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Filed: April 15, 2015

Do not publish
# C_2016202EN.01015501.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/155 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/155

---

Article 241

(ex Article 208 TEC)

(ex Article 208 TEC)

The Council, acting by a simple majority, may request the Commission to undertake any studies the Council considers desirable for the attainment of the common objectives, and to submit to it any appropriate proposals. If the Commission does not submit a proposal, it shall inform the Council of the reasons.

---
# C_2016202EN.01016601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/166 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/166

---

Article 278

(ex Article 242 TEC)

(ex Article 242 TEC)

Actions brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union shall not have suspensory effect. The Court may, however, if it considers that circumstances so require, order that application of the contested act be suspended.

---
# C_2016202EN.01035201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/352 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/352

---

44.   Declaration on Article 5 of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union

Declaration on Article 5 of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis

The Conference notes that where a Member State has made a notification under Article 5(2) of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union that it does not wish to take part in a proposal or initiative, that notification may be withdrawn at any moment before the adoption of the measure building upon the Schengen acquis.

acquis

acquis

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE II

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 5

COMMON PROVISIONS

Article 320

(ex Article 277 TEC)

(ex Article 277 TEC)

The multiannual financial framework and the annual budget shall be drawn up in euro.

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (the
"Registration Statement") of our report dated April 24, 2002, relating to the
financial statements of The Prudential Variable Contract Account-24, which
appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us
under the headings "Experts" and "Financial Highlights" in such Registration
Statement.

We also consent to the use in this Registration Statement of our report dated
February 12, 2002, relating to the consolidated financial statements of The
Prudential Insurance Company of America, which appears in such Registration
Statement.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
April 24, 2002
Order entered April 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00373-CR

CHARLES WILLIAM DOSS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-58147-Y

ORDER

Appellant has filed a motion in this court that asks the trial court for a free reporter’s 

record of the trial court proceedings. This court issued its opinion on May 28, 2014 and the 

mandate issued on December 1, 2014. Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-
71286, No. 33-51377, and No. 33-29801 on Forms S-3 and No. 33-39873 and No. 33-
61035 on Forms S-8 of Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, of our reports dated
February 5, 1996, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cascade
Natural Gas Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1995.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Seattle, Washington
March 26, 1996

                                      51
Tribal Seafood Pandemic Response and Safety

Grant Program (TSPRS)

Document Checklist

Instructions: Listed below are the components of a complete application package. Use this 

checklist to ensure that your application is complete and in compliance with the application 

requirements. 

Include this checklist with your application

CHECK

OFF REQUIRED DOCUMENTS

☐ TSPRS Application Funding & Request Form (Appendix B) 

☐ Application for Federal Assistance: SF-424 

(See application website)

☐ Tribal Documents of Incorporation (Copy of Tribal Charter)
# C_2016203EN.01001901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/19

---

Article 34

Any Member State in whose territories particularly dangerous experiments are to take place shall take additional health and safety measures, on which it shall first obtain the opinion of the Commission.

The assent of the Commission shall be required where the effects of such experiments are liable to affect the territories of other Member States.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          75061460
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   135373036
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  9999919
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               238140592
<CASH>                                         1544438
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              913186
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                        13524777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               277359597
<POLICY-LOSSES>                               55336376
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                           41541432
<POLICY-OTHER>                                23167674
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      11529376
<OTHER-SE>                                   129786597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 277359597
<PREMIUMS>                                    88629476
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            9119936
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            13198139
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  113005
<BENEFITS>                                    52377114
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   29220814
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           1461640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               28000988
<INCOME-TAX>                                   8577075
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           19423913
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  19423913
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.72
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                71472338
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                           49862090
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              3575305
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                            20035517
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                              26370166
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                               78504050
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 8146]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Impressionism, Fashion, and Modernity,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about February 26, 2013, until on or about May 27, 2013, the Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, from on or about June 25, 2013, until on or about September 23, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: January 2, 2013. 

J. Adam Ereli,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2013-00246 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P