alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-79547) on Form S-8 of Bridgford
Foods Corporation of our report dated January 28, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Bridgford Foods Corporation as of October 31,
2008 and November 2, 2007, and the related statements of operations,
shareholders equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for the fiscal
years ended October 31, 2008 and November 2, 2007, and the related financial
statement schedule, which report appears in the October 31, 2008 annual report
on Form 10-K of Bridgford Foods Corporation.

|                         | /s/ |  | HASKELL & WHITE
      LLP
|------------------------ | --- |  | -------------------------
|                        
|Irvine,
      California |     |  |                          
|January 28,
      2009   |     |  |                          

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


          KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and officers of BRUSH WELLMAN INC., an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"),
hereby constitutes and appoints Gordon D. Harnett, Michael C. Hasychak and David
Porter, and each of them, their true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact,
with full power of substitution and revocation, for them and in their names,
place and stead, to sign on their behalf as a director or officer, or both, as
the case may be, of the Corporation, an Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1999, and to sign any and all amendments to such Annual
Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission granting unto
said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, and each of them, full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their substitute or substitutes,
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands as
of the 7th day of March, 2000.


/s/ Gordon D. Harnett                        /s/ Joseph P. Keithley
---------------------------------------      -----------------------------
Gordon D. Harnett, Chairman, President,      Joseph P. Keithley, Director
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


/s/ Albert C. Bersticker                     /s/ William P. Madar
-------------------------------              -------------------------------
Albert C. Bersticker, Director               William P. Madar, Director


/s/ Charles F. Brush, III                    /s/ Robert M. McInnes
-------------------------------              -------------------------------
Charles F. Brush, III, Director              Robert M. McInnes, Director


/s/ David L. Burner                          /s/ William R. Robertson
---------------------------                  -------------------------------
David L. Burner, Director                    William R. Robertson, Director


/s/ David H. Hoag                            /s/ John Sherwin, Jr.
---------------------------                  -------------------------------
David H. Hoag, Director                      John Sherwin, Jr., Director


/s/ John D. Grampa
---------------------------------------
John D. Grampa, Vice President Finance,
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1207 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to include United States 

nationals among the eligible employees of an EB–5 commercial enterprise, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2019 

Mrs. RADEWAGEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to include 

United States nationals among the eligible employees 

of an EB–5 commercial enterprise, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S. Nationals Em5 ployment Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1207 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF UNITED STATES NATIONALS AS ELI2 GIBLE EMPLOYEES. 

3 Section 203(b)(5)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(A)(ii)) is amended by 

5 inserting after ‘‘not fewer than 10 United States citizens’’ 

6 the following: ‘‘, United States nationals,’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES COLE, on behalf of himself and

all others similarly situated,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CRST VAN EXPEDITED, INC., an Iowa

Corporation, FKA CRST, Inc.,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-55507

D.C. No. 5:08-cv-01570-VAP-OP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 9, 2015** 

Pasadena California

Before: SILVERMAN and BEA, Circuit Judges, and QUIST, Senior District

Judge.*** 

FILED

APR 14 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
Plaintiff James Cole appeals the district court’s grant of judgment on the

pleadings, dismissing Cole’s class action claim against Defendant CRST Van

Expedited, Inc. alleging violations of California’s meal and rest break laws, Cal.

Lab. Code §§ 226.7, 512, and Cal. Code Regs. tit. 8, § 11090. We have

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse.

On appeal, Cole argues that the district court erred in dismissing his meal

and rest break claim on the basis that the Federal Aviation Administration

Authorization Act of 1994 preempts California’s meal and rest break laws. We

review de novo the interpretation and construction of the FAAAA, Tillison v.

Gregoire, 424 F.3d 1093, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005), and a district court’s grant of

judgment on the pleadings, Harris v. County of Orange, 682 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th

Cir. 2012). 

We recently held in Dilts v. Penske Logistics, LLC, 769 F.3d 637, 647-50

(9th Cir. 2014), that California’s meal and rest break laws are not “related to”

prices, routes or services and therefore are not preempted by the FAAAA. In light

of our holding in Dilts, the district court erred by granting CSRT’s motion for

judgment on the pleadings on the basis of FAAAA preemption. Accordingly, we

reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with Dilts.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Brush Wellman Inc. of our report dated January 26, 1999, included in the 1998
Annual Report to Shareholders of Brush Wellman Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Brush Wellman Inc.
listed in Item 14(a) 2. This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and Post-Effective Amendments of our report dated January 26, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by
reference and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the
financial statement schedule included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Brush
Wellman Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998:

       Registration Statement Number 333-63351 on Form S-8 dated September 14,
       1998; 
       Registration Statement Number 333-63353 on Form S-8 dated September 14,
       1998;
       Registration Statement Number 333-63355 on Form S-8 dated September 14,
       1998;
       Registration Statement Number 333-63357 on Form S-8 dated September 14,
       1998;
       Registration Statement Number 333-52141 on Form S-8 dated May 5, 1998;
       Registration Statement Number 33-60709 on Form S-8 dated June 29, 1995;
       Registration Statement Number 33-48866 on Form S-8 dated June 27, 1992;
       Registration Statement Number 33-45323 on Form S-8 dated February 3,
       1992;
       Post-Effective Amendment Number 1 to Registration Statement Number
       33-28950 on Form S-8 dated February 3, 1992;
       Registration Statement Number 33-35979 on Form S-8 dated July 20, 1990;
       Registration Statement Number 33-28605 on Form S-8 dated May 5, 1989;
       Registration Statement Number 2-90724 on Form S-8 dated April 27, 1984;
       Post-Effective Amendment Number 3 to Registration Statement Number
       2-64080 on Form S-8 dated April 22, 1983.



                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 29, 1999
Exhibit 10.1



AMENDMENT

TO

INVESTMENT ADVISOR AGREEMENT



This Amendment to Investment Advisor Agreement
(Amendment) is entered into this 16thday of July, 2004, by and between State Street Bank and Trust
Company, a trust company organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (State Street), and Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the Advisor), with reference to the
following facts:



WHEREAS, State Street and the Advisor
entered into an Investment Advisor Agreement on July 1, 2002 (the Agreement), wherein State Street appointed the Advisor, and the Advisor accepted the appointment, to provide investment management services with respect to a portion of
the assets of the American Bar Association Members/State Street Collective Trust (the ABA Members Collective Trust); and



WHEREAS, State Street and the Advisor hereby agree to amend the Agreement as indicated below.



NOW, THEREFORE, State Street and the Advisor agree as follows:



1. The third paragraph on page one of the Agreement is
hereby amended by replacing the words Intermediate Bond Equity Fund with Intermediate Bond Fund.



2. Section 4(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the last two sentences, starting with Advisor is authorized on behalf
of the Subaccount to enter into individual confirmation documents and replacing such sentences with the following:



For those transactions that constitute an Authorized Transaction under the Agreement, the Advisor is authorized on behalf of the
Subaccount to enter into agreements and execute any documents (which shall include the ISDA Master Agreement and Credit Support Annex and any other documents related thereto) required to make investments that are permitted pursuant to the Fund
Declaration attached as Appendix B hereto, as such appendix may be amended from time to time.



3. Except as modified herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. All capitalized
terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.



EXECUTED on the date first above written.



|                                          |  |                          |  |                                     |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Pacific Investment Management Company LLC |  |                          |  | State Street Bank and Trust Company
|                                          |  |                          |  |                                    
|By:                                       |  | /S/    BRENT L.
HOLDEN   |  |                                     |  | By: |  | /S/    BETH
HALBERSTADT
|                                          |  | Name: Brent L. Holden    |  |                                     |  |     |  | Name: Beth Halberstadt 
|                                          |  | Title: Managing Director |  |                                     |  |     |  | Title: Vice President
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lubys, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Christopher J. Pappas, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    CHRISTOPHER J. PAPPAS         
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Christopher J. Pappas                
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7022** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
MARQUIS ANTHONY NELSON , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Bluefield

. Irene C. Berger , District Judge. ( 1:08

- cr
- 00058

- 1; 1:15

- cv
- 13059 )

Submitted : October 13 , 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by un published per curiam opinion

.

Marquis Anthony Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. John Lanier File, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia; Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublis hed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Marquis Anthony Nelson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. However, we affirm as

modified to reflect that Nelson’s motion is dismissed without
prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Modanlo , 762 F.3d 403, 408 (4th Cir. 2014) (holding that “district court
does not regain jurisdiction until the issuance of the mandate by the clerk of the court of appeals” (internal quotation marks
omitted))

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional proces s.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE IV

OTHER PROVISIONS

OTHER PROVISIONS

Article 41

If transitional measures are necessary to facilitate the transition from the existing regime in Croatia to that resulting from the application of the common agricultural policy under the conditions set out in this Act, they shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 195(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1) in conjunction with Article 13(1)(b) of European Parliament and Council Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 (2) or the relevant procedure as determined in the applicable legislation. They may be adopted within a period of three years from the date of accession and their application shall be limited to that period. The Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, may extend this period.

1

2

Transitional measures referred to in the first paragraph may also be adopted prior to the date of accession, if necessary. Such measures shall be adopted by the Council acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission or, where they affect instruments initially adopted by the Commission, they shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedures required for adopting the instruments in question.

---

(1)  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13.

2

---
_____________ 

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

John Doe, Petitioner, 

v. 

City of Duncan, Respondent. 

Appellate Case No. 2015-000074 

Lower Court Case No. 2008-CP-42-00475 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE 

COURT OF APPEALS 

Appeal From Spartanburg County 

The Honorable J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2015-MO-019 

Submitted March 19, 2015 – Filed April 15, 2015 

REVERSED AND REMANDED 

Gregg E. Meyers, of Jeff Anderson & Associates, PA, of 

St. Paul, Minnesota, for Petitioner. 

William Harrell Foster, III, of Nelson Mullins Riley & 

Scarborough, LLP, of Greenville; A. Mattison Bogan, 

and Miles E. Coleman, both of Nelson Mullins Riley & 

Scarborough, LLP, of Columbia; and Charles Franklin 
Turner, Jr., of Willson Jones Carter & Baxley, P.A., of 

Greenville, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the 

Court of Appeals in Doe v. City of Duncan, Op. No. 2014-UP-400 (S.C. Ct. App. 

filed Nov. 12, 2014). We grant the petition on petitioner's Question 1, deny the 

petition on petitioner's Question 2, and dispense with further briefing. 

The only argument made by petitioner before the circuit court was that his 

summons and complaint were timely served because the time for serving them was 

tolled under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. Although the circuit court judge 

did not specifically state he did not believe the Act applied in this case, he 

implicitly rejected petitioner's argument by finding the service was not timely. 

Therefore, the Court of Appeals incorrectly held the issue raised by petitioner was 

not preserved for appellate review. Staubes v. City of Folly Beach, 339 S.C. 406, 

529 S.E.2d 543 (2000) (this Court does not require parties to engage in futile 

actions in order to preserve issues for appellate review); I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of 

Mt. Pleasant, 338 S.C. 406, 526 S.E.2d 716 (2000) (only when the losing party 

raised an issue in the lower court, but the lower court failed to rule on it, is the 

party required to file a motion to alter or amend the judgment in order to preserve 

the issue for appellate review). 

Accordingly, we reverse the opinion of the Court of Appeals and remand this 

matter to the Court of Appeals to rule on the merits of petitioner's appeal. 

REVERSED AND REMANDED. 

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., 

concur.
Exhibit 23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-207296, No. 333-177433, No. 333-177432, No. 333-118681) on Form S-8 of Capital Southwest Corporation and Subsidiaries (the Company) of our reports dated June 5, 2018, relating to the consolidated financial statements, the financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of the Company, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2018. 

 

 

 

/s/ RSM US LLP

 

 

Dallas, Texas

June 5, 2018

 

 

----
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-184-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                            29,567
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  29,567
<PP&E>                                         4,891,359
<DEPRECIATION>                                    64,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,119,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,181,884
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          18,962
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,144,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,119,118
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    578,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                15,688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (594,362)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (594,362)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (594,362)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.032)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.032)
        

</TABLE>