alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

                              SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  OFFICER OR EXECUTIVE                 MULTIPLE
                  --------------------                 --------
<S>                                                   <C>
                  Donald L. Evans                        2.5
                  James D. Lightner                      2.5
                  Thomas W. Dyk                          2
                  Peter R. Scherer                       2
                  Bruce R. DeBoer                        2
                  Daniel G. Blanchard                    2
                  Jack F. Harper                         2
                  R. Kim Harris                          2
                  B. Jack Reed                           2
                  Clifford C. Drescher                   2
                  Hilary G. Dussing                      2
                  Rodney G. Mellott                      2
</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENTRELL D. WELCH, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

NEVADA, STATE OF; JUVENILE 

FOSTER HOME PLACEMENT; CHILD 

PROTECTION SERVICES; CLARK 

COUNTY MUNICIPALITY DISTRICT; 

TICK SEGERBLOOM; MARIYLYN 

KIRKPARTICK, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 22-15342 

D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00113-RCJ-CSD 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2023**

Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Kentrell D. Welch appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that he was abused while in foster 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 10 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-15342 

care. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a 

dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 

213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Welch’s action because Welch failed to 

allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 

662, 678, 681 (2009) (a claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads 

factual content allowing a reasonable inference that a defendant is liable for the 

misconduct alleged; conclusory allegations are not entitled to the presumption of 

truth); see also West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988) (“To state a claim under 

§ 1983, a plaintiff must . . . show that the alleged deprivation was committed by a 

person acting under color of state law.”); Castro v. County of Los Angeles, 833 

F.3d 1060, 1073-76 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (discussing requirements to establish 

municipal liability under Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 

(1978)).

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
lf8t£!. !JtosTI}) CLERJ< 

CR..X/IJJJ/4-L t!f)a~oF /f!fgj£5 a~ TlZJCl,.OS . 

Po&; tJ/1'ft!? r;J.3ofj' 

C/ffJ+WH. fifl7}-7ZZJA1 

/fus't;T;fl, TF~/1$ "?t71 I 

Rrn &r,rof .&/1 Wtf. ~ 79S:o,;). 

APR 17 2015 

katZ f!ktt-J; . Abil Acoot&t, Clerk 

. -jAA- j),epep~J?; ~,V my wd/~ CVHd td/le 

tktdtd ;ne a) Den/a/! ~ Pie k/.&/--P/4z~ ~f, 

~ ~. /& /.2P/bu,_ m1 wv;l and M#'/ me~ 

#.R /:ka!e.td.ud Mk# tM te-ik/ /r? 4 ~ . ~J w$ lt.t ttJd/ A? tMtiP£. !;4-- nze__ c6 M~~ 

~ dditul~ \ y!Jh. Jpk-f ..MJ·· · fo· c/15/Jim:r ~tWJ:t;o/J;~ 

~dwW dJ/TF!e-eade.s, _a&, ;kaJ'e /&~ "o/ uJd/ 

:7o IIJ f ntry' {!.12Hed; ~ tZnJI k /'~ ~ &s 

/f!'l.af ~f . ' 

~~.~~~~ . 

!J7jleel~ ~dl4, ~/;lhs Jt./SCJCf3/p 

VJI)l:c#-A£L UAI..CT ~btP'f fZ/11 ;L!JF7' r-----

~1£-SYE!£~/l)lflt; ./£/}#-5 

7sBfJJ,
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7855]

# AGENCY:

State Department.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Quay Brothers: On Deciphering the Pharmacist's Prescription for Lip-Reading Puppets” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, NY, from on or about August 12, 2012, until on or about January 7, 2013; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: April 16, 2012.

J. Adam Ereli,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2012-9915 Filed 4-23-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF BRADLEY REAL ESTATE, INC.

Bradley Bethal Limited Partnership, a Nebraska limited partnership

Bradley Real Estate Management, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation

Bradley Midwest Management, Inc., a Minnesota corporation

Bradley Operating Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

Bradley Financing Corp., a Delaware corporation

Bradley Financing Partnership, a Delaware partnership

Bradley Management Corp., a Delaware corporation

Bradley Management Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

Bradley Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Bradley Spring Mall, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Bradley Spring Mall Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

BTR Development Corp., a Delaware corporation

BTR Development Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

Williamson Square Associates Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

BOLP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.5
ILIVE, INC,
CONVERTIBLE NOTE

$1,500,000

IRVINE, CA
APRIL 6, 2002

                         EXTENSION OF THE MATURITY DATE

         Street Capital Inc, hereby grants iLive, Inc. a sixty (60) day
extension on the $1,500,000 convertible note issued on October 1, 2000. The
original note was due on or before 5:00PM, Pacific Standard Time, on April 7,
2002. The extension will extend the payment or conversion rights to June 7,
2002.

         This extension is executed by Street Capital Inc. In accordance with
the terms and conditions set forth in the orginal note.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has signed and sealed this Note and
delivered it in Irvine, California as of April 6, 2002.

iLive, Inc.

By: /s/ Albert Aimers
Albert Aimers, CEO

Street Capital, Inc.

By: /s/ Scott Henricks
Scott Henricks, President
# C_2016203EN.01005001.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/50

---

Article 201

The Community shall establish close cooperation with the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the details of which shall be determined by common accord.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NATASHA BECKETT,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 18

- 55086
D.C. No. 2:17

- cv - 08328

- PA

- AS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 6, 2020 ** San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and HILLMAN, *** District Judge.
Plaintiff

- Appellant Natasha Beckett (“Ms. Beckett”) appeals from the dismissal, without leave to amend, of her California common

- law fraud claim

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Timothy Hillman, United States District Judge for the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

JAN 9 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

against Defendant

- Appellee Bank of America, NA (“Ba nk of America”). She argues
that the district court erred in concluding that her claim w as time

- barred because, under either the delayed discovery or estoppel by fraudulent concealment defenses , her claim did not accrue until she learned about the fraud, i.e. , when she read a law
firm advertisement posted by her attorneys. We disagree.
These defenses only delay accrual until a plaintiff “has, or should have, inquiry notice of the cause of action.” Fox v. Ethicon Endo

- Surgery, Inc ., 110 P.3d 914, 920 (Cal. 2005 ) ; see also Platt Elec. Supply, Inc. v. EOFF Elec., Inc. , 522 F.3d 1049, 1057 (9th Cir. 2008)

. Given the volume of missing or allegedly incomplete applications (five), the number of home inspections charged to her account (twenty

five), and her receipt of a notice of foreclosure shortly after she was approved for

— and made several timely paym ents under

— a loan modification plan, Ms. Beckett was on inquiry notice of fraud by, at the latest, the January 2011 short

- sale of her
home. She thus cannot benefit from either d efense

. Ms. Beckett also challenges the district court’s denial of leave to amend her
C omplaint. However, the district court did not err because any amendment would
have been futile. See Deutsch v. Turner Corp. , 324 F.3d 692, 717

– 18 (9th Cir. 2003). For these reasons, the district court’s dismissal of Ms. B eckett’s claim is
AFFIRMED
.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XX

ENVIRONMENT

ENVIRONMENT

Article 193

(ex Article 176 TEC)

(ex Article 176 TEC)

The protective measures adopted pursuant to Article 192 shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective measures. Such measures must be compatible with the Treaties. They shall be notified to the Commission.

---
Exhibit 21.1



BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION



SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                                      |  |                             |  |            |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ---------- |  | 
|Name of Subsidiary                                    |  | State in which Incorporated
|Bridgford Marketing Company                           |  |                             |  | California |  | 
|Bridgford Meat Company                                |  |                             |  | California |  | 
|Bridgford Food Processing Corporation                 |  |                             |  | California |  | 
|Bridgford Food Processing of Texas, L.P.**            |  |                             |  | Texas      |  | 
|A.S.I. Corporation                                    |  |                             |  | California |  | 
|Bridgford Distributing Company of Delaware (inactive) |  |                             |  | Delaware   |  | 
|American Ham Processors, Inc.* (inactive)             |  |                             |  | Delaware   |  | 
|Bert Packing Company (inactive)                       |  |                             |  | Illinois   |  | 
|Moriarty Meat Company (inactive)                      |  |                             |  | Illinois   |  | 



* - No shares have been issued.



** - Limited Partnership.
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

38.   Declaration on Article 252 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union regarding the number of Advocates-General in the Court of Justice

Declaration on Article 252 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union regarding the number of Advocates-General in the Court of Justice

The Conference declares that if, in accordance with Article 252, first paragraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court of Justice requests that the number of Advocates-General be increased by three (eleven instead of eight), the Council will, acting unanimously, agree on such an increase.

In that case, the Conference agrees that Poland will, as is already the case for Germany, France, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom, have a permanent Advocate-General and no longer take part in the rotation system, while the existing rotation system will involve the rotation of five Advocates-General instead of three.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1822]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas,*                     the Ports of Indiana, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 177, has requested manufacturing authority on behalf of Hoosier Stamping & Mfg. Corp. d/b/a Hoosier Wheel (Hoosier Stamping) within FTZ 177 in Chandler, Indiana, (FTZ Docket 68-2011, filed 10-25-2011);                

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (76 FR 67132-67133, 10-31-2011) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;                

*Now, therefore,*                     the Board hereby orders:                

                    The application for manufacturing authority under zone procedures within FTZ 177 on behalf of Hoosier Stamping, as described in the application and                     **Federal Register**                     notice, is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.                

      ( print page 24178)    
Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of April 2012.

Paul Piquado,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

ATTEST:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-9742 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1343 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove an institutional 

bias by making permanent the protection for recipients of home and 

community-based services against spousal impoverishment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2019 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself and Mr. UPTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove 

an institutional bias by making permanent the protection 

for recipients of home and community-based services 

against spousal impoverishment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Married 

5 Seniors from Impoverishment Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1343 IH

1 SEC. 2. MAKING PERMANENT THE PROTECTION UNDER 

2 MEDICAID FOR RECIPIENTS OF HOME AND 

3 COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICES AGAINST 

4 SPOUSAL IMPOVERISHMENT. 

5 Section 1924(h)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 1396r–5(h)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘(at the 

7 option of the State) is described in section 

8 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(VI)’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘be9 fore April 1, 2019, (at the option of the State) is described 

10 in section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(VI), or, beginning April 1, 

11 2019, is eligible for medical assistance for home and com12 munity-based services provided under subsection (c), (d), 

13 or (i) of section 1915, under a waiver approved under sec14 tion 1115, or who is eligible for such medical assistance 

15 by reason of being determined eligible under section 

16 1902(a)(10)(C) or by reason of section 1902(f) or other17 wise on the basis of a reduction of income based on costs 

18 incurred for medical or other remedial care, or who is eligi19 ble for medical assistance for home and community-based 

20 attendant services and supports under section 1915(k)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order

September 28, 2005

128248

CLAYTON W. COBURN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

RICHFIELD INDUSTRIES, and TRAVELERS INSURA NCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/ SC: 128248 COA: 257906 WCAC: 03-000294 Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 4, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l 0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005
Clerk
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 5

SECTION 5

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 273

(ex Article 239 TEC)

(ex Article 239 TEC)

The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction in any dispute between Member States which relates to the subject matter of the Treaties if the dispute is submitted to it under a special agreement between the parties.

---