alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XVI

TRANS-EUROPEAN NETWORKS

TRANS-EUROPEAN NETWORKS

Article 170

(ex Article 154 TEC)

(ex Article 154 TEC)

1.   To help achieve the objectives referred to in Articles 26 and 174 and to enable citizens of the Union, economic operators and regional and local communities to derive full benefit from the setting-up of an area without internal frontiers, the Union shall contribute to the establishment and development of trans-European networks in the areas of transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructures.

2.   Within the framework of a system of open and competitive markets, action by the Union shall aim at promoting the interconnection and interoperability of national networks as well as access to such networks. It shall take account in particular of the need to link island, landlocked and peripheral regions with the central regions of the Union.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of FAO, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the periodending August 2, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerome A. Kollar, Senior Vice President-Financeof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 3, 2003 |                            | /s/  Jerome A. Kollar |   |
|------------------------|---------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                   | Jerome  A. Kollar               |                  |
|                   | Senior  Vice President-Finance  |                  |
|                   | (Principal  Accounting Officer) |                  |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9525]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, April 
18, 2012 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:

    The Commission will consider whether to adopt joint rules with 
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission relating to the definitions 
of ``Swap Dealer,'' ``Security-Based Swap Dealer,'' ``Major Swap 
Participant,'' ``Major Security-Based Swap Participant,'' and 
``Eligible Contract Participant.''

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, determined that no earlier 
notice thereof was possible.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.


    Dated: April 16, 2012.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9525 Filed 4-17-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
EXHIBIT
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
  I, David
Lichtenstein, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Company”)
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:
 
 (1) The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,
2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m); and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ David
      Lichtenstein
 David
      Lichtenstein
 Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal
      Executive Officer)
 November
      15, 2010
LEONARDO URGUELLES,

Appellant,

v.

EL OASIS CAFE AND 

TECHNOLOGY INS. CO.,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5333

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 15, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Gerardo Castiello, Judge.

Date of Accident: October 19, 2012.

Mark L. Zientz of the Law Offices of Mark L. Zientz, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Rayford H. Taylor of Casey Gilson, P.C., Atlanta, Ga., for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, Claimant argues that the Judge of 

Compensation Claims (JCC) erred when he reduced a stipulated Claimant-paid 
attorney’s fee submitted for his approval to ten percent of the monetary value of past 

benefits secured. Section 440.34(1), Florida Statutes (2012), provides that “any 

attorney’s fee” approved by a JCC must equal 20% of the first $5,000 secured by the 

attorney, 15% of the next $5,000, and 10% of the remaining benefits secured over 

$10,000 (the “20/15/10 formula”). The JCC indicated that he reduced the stipulated

fee amount under the 20/15/10 formula based on his interpretation that the first 

$10,000 in benefits secured, to which the percentages of twenty and fifteen percent 

would apply, had been “exhausted” with the approval of another attorney’s fee on a 

lump-sum settlement (which were collected by another attorney altogether). The 

JCC did not, however, have the benefit of our recent decision in Cortes-Martinez v. 

Palmetto Vegetable Co., 40 Fla. L. Weekly D609 (Fla. 1st DCA Mar. 10, 2015),

where this Court held that each separate and distinct attorney’s fee is subject to the 

20/15/10 formula. Because the reduction here was based on an incorrect 

interpretation of the application of the 20/15/10 formula, we REVERSE and 

REMAND for entry of an order approving the stipulated Claimant-paid attorney’s 

fee. 

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.

2
EXHIBIT 10.1

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   Ministry of Energy Mines and Petroleum Resources

RECORD OF 4 POST CLAIM - MINERAL TENURE ACT

(Section 27)

	
_____________________________________
	
392222________________________________

	
Mining Division
	
Tenure No.

	
_____________________________________
	
_______________________________________

	
Gold Commissioner
	
Date of Record




_____________________________________________________________________________________

APPLICATION TO RECORD A 4 POST CLAIM

I, Stephen Kenwood, Name of Locator, 2073 149th Street, Surrey, British Columbia, V4A 8C4, (604) 535-8146, Client No. 134185, hereby apply for record of a 4 Post Claim for the location as outlined on the attached copy of mineral titles reference map No. 82L02E, in the Vernon Mining Division.

ACCESS

Describe how you gained access to the location, include reference to roads, trails, topographic features, permanent landmarks and a description of the legal post location.

Travel east on Highway 6 from Vernon to Cherryville.  From Cherryville travel approximately 16 km. along Highway 6 to Monashee Creek.  3.7 km. further along Highway 6 LCP is located approximately 200 metres east of Highway 6 along power line.

GPS Co-ordinates taken of posts:  Yes [  ]  No [x]  If yes, complete information chart on reverse.

TAG INFORMATION

I have securely fastened the metal identification tag embossed "LEGAL CORNER POST" to the legal corner post (or "witness post") and impressed this information on the tag:

TAG No. SF 244218  LEGAL CORNER POST

	
CLAIM NAME
	
GABI

	
LOCATOR
	
Stephen Kenwood

	
FMC No.
	
134185

	
DATE COMMENCED
	
March 13, 2002

	
TIME 
	
10:15 a.m.

	
DATE COMPLETED
	
March 13, 2002

	
TIME
	
4:30 p.m.




Number of Claim Units

N 4 S__ E__W 5

IDENTIFICATION POSTS NOT PLACED WERE:  4N0W, 4N1W, 4N2W, 4N3W, 4N4W, 4N5W, 5W3N, 5W2N, 5W1N, 5W0N, 4W0N, 3W0N, 2W0N because deep heavy snow in valley and snow and ice on steep slopes to the west were treacherous.

If a witness post was placed for the legal corner post:

Bearing from witness post to true position of legal corner post is _______degrees at a distance of ______ metres.

NOTE:  Legal Corner Post can be witnessed only if it was not feasible to place any posts.

ACKNOWLEGEMENT

I have complied with all the terms and conditions of the Mineral Tenure Act and Regulation pertaining to the location of 4 post claims and have attached a plan of the location on which the positions of the legal corner post and all other corner posts (and witness and identification post, if applicable) are indicated.  The tag information supplied above is the identical information that I impressed upon the tag affixed to the applicable post when I located this claim and this information is true and correct.

/s/ "Stephen Kenwood"

Stephen Kenwood



Signature of Locator

SEAL

RECEIVED

SUB-RECORDER

VANCOUVER, BC

MAR. 20, 2002

Recording Stamp
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, April 26, 2012 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, April 26, 2012 will be: 

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; 

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings; and 

An opinion.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: April 19, 2012.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-9933 Filed 4-20-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
C100AirQualityManagementSection1141LimitingEmissionsofVolatileOrganicCompoundsfromConsumerandCommercialProducts3.0PortableFuelContainers3.1Applicability.*****3.1.3Therequirementsof3.0ofthisregulationapplyonandafterJanuary1,2003,toanyportablefuelcontainerorspoutorbothportablefuelcontainerandspoutmanufacturedbetweenbefore-January1,2003andDecember31,2008,inclusive,exceptthatanyportablefuelcontainerorspoutorbothportablefuelcontainerandspoutmanufacturedbeforeJanuary1,2003thatdoesnotmeettherequirementsof3.0ofthisregulation,maybesold,supplied,orofferedforsaleuntilJanuary1,2004,providedthatthedateofmanufactureoradatecode,representingthedateofmanufacture,isclearlydisplayedontheportablefuelcontainerorspout.Note:Portablefuelcontainersbecameregulatedunderfederalregulation37FR8428effectiveJanuary1,2009.*****100AirQualityManagementSection1141LimitingEmissionsofVolatileOrganicCompoundsfromConsumerandCommercialProducts04/11/20103.0PortableFuelContainers3.1Applicability.*****3.1.3Therequirementsof3.0ofthisregulationapplytoanyportablefuelcontainerorspoutorbothportablefuelcontainerandspoutmanufacturedbetweenJanuary1,2003andDecember31,2008,inclusive,exceptthatanyportablefuelcontainerorspoutorbothportablefuelcontainerandspoutmanufacturedbeforeJanuary1,2003thatdoesnotmeettherequirementsof3.0ofthisregulation,maybesold,supplied,orofferedforsaleuntilJanuary1,2004,providedthatthedateofmanufactureoradatecode,representingthedateofmanufacture,isclearlydisplayedontheportablefuelcontainerorspout.Note:Portablefuelcontainersbecameregulatedunderfederalregulation37FR8428effectiveJanuary1,2009.*****
FORMAL RECOMMENDATION BY THE

NATIONAL ORGANIC STANDARDS BOARD (NOSB) 

TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIC PROGRAM (NOP) 

Date: May 31, 2006______________________

Subject: Sunset Review - 205.603; Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic 

livestock production 

Chair: Kevin R. O’Rell_________________________________ 

Recommendation

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action: ___XXXXXX_____ 

Guidance Statement: _

Other: ________ 

Statement of the Recommendation:

See attached Recommendation for Renewal of Oxytocin as Synthetic substances allowed for 

use in organic livestock production on 205.603, category use (a) as disinfectants, sanitizer, 

and medical treatments as applicable. 

NOSB Vote: 

Moved: Hue Karreman Second: Nancy Ostiguy 

Yes – 8 

No – 2 

Abstain – 2 

Absent- 2 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation:

NOSB Sunset Material Vote 

Response by the NOP:
National Organic Standards Board 

Livestock Committee 

Final Recommendation for the Synthetic substances allowed for use in 

organic livestock production 

April 20, 2006

Category Use: 

(a) As disinfectants, sanitizer, and medical treatments as applicable 

Committee Summary: 

A number of specific comments were received on oxytocin. Several commentors stated 

that oxytocin should remain on the National List. Some commentors stated that oxytocin 

should be removed from the list. The Livestock Committee agrees with the commentors 

who supported the renewal of oxytocin because its use is considered not harmful to 

humans or the environment, it is considered essential in assuring the health and welfare 

of organic livestock and it can be used in a way compatible with organic production 

practices. 

NOSB Recommendation(s): 

Recommendation Based upon Comments Received – 205.603(a) 

The NOSB recommends the renewal of the following substance(s) in this use category: 

 

(12) Oxytocin—use in postparturition therapeutic applications. 

Moved: Hue Karreman Second: Nancy Ostiguy 

Board vote: Yes – 8 No – 2 Abstain – 2 Absent - 2
1 

Filed 4/16/15 Marriage of Olden CA3 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

COPY 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT 

(Sacramento) 

---- 

In re the Marriage of SHANNON KOLLEEN and 

MARK ALVIN OLDEN. 

C076571 

SHANNON KOLLEEN OLDEN, 

 Respondent, 

 v. 

MARK ALVIN OLDEN, 

 Appellant. 

(Super. Ct. No. 13FL06545) 

 Appellant Mark Alvin Olden appeals from a domestic violence restraining order 

issued on April 11, 2014. Appellant asserts he was not given proper notice of the hearing 

on the restraining order, but he does not provide factual or legal authority to support his 

claim. We affirm the order of the court. 

 “ ‘A judgment or order of the lower court is presumed correct. All intendments 

and presumptions are indulged to support it on matters as to which the record is silent, 
2 

and error must be affirmatively shown. This is not only a general principle of appellate 

practice but an ingredient of the constitutional doctrine of reversible error.’ [Citations.]” 

(Denham v. Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 557, 564.) Accordingly, we must adopt all 

inferences in favor of the judgment, unless the record expressly contradicts them. (See 

Brewer v. Simpson (1960) 53 Cal.2d 567, 583.) It is an appellant’s burden to 

affirmatively show error by citing an adequate record to support his summary of the facts 

and legal authority to support each analytical point made; otherwise, the point is 

forfeited. (See, e.g., Hernandez v. California Hospital Medical Center (2000) 

78 Cal.App.4th 498, 502.) These restrictive rules of appellate procedure apply to 

appellant even though he is representing himself on appeal. (Leslie v. Board of Medical 

Quality Assurance (1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 117, 121; see also Wantuch v. Davis (1995) 

32 Cal.App.4th 786, 795.) 

 Appellant’s sole claim on appeal is he “was not served correctly and due process 

was not adhered to.” Appellant fails, however, to support his claim with any citation to 

authority or the record on appeal. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(1)(B), (C).) 

His claim is thus forfeited. (See Badie v. Bank of America (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 779, 

784-785; see also Opdyk v. California Horse Racing Bd. (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 1826, 

1830-1831, fn. 4.) 

DISPOSITION 

 The order of the trial court is affirmed. 

 RENNER , J. 

We concur: 

 RAYE , P. J. 

 HULL , J.
International Commodity Procurement Division Purchases

FY2021 - Quarter 3

Commodity Qty in MT PO Value Average Cost

BEANS, BLACK BAG-50 KG 920 $939,508.80 $1,021.21

BEANS, PEA BAG-50 KG 130 $121,145.70 $931.89

BEANS, PINTO BAG-50 KG 150 $153,513.00 $1,023.42

BEANS, SMALL RED BAG-50 KG 890 $1,354,497.90 $1,521.91

BULGUR BAG-50 KG 1,130 $573,489.60 $507.51

BULGUR, SOY-FORT BAG-50 KG 860 $540,909.50 $628.96

CORN, YELLOW BAG-50 KG 540 $184,140.00 $341.00

CORNMEAL BAG-HP-25 KG 620 $334,105.60 $538.88

CORNMEAL, SOY-FORT BAG-HP-25 KG 100 $65,910.00 $659.10

CORN-SOY BLEND PLUS BAG-HP-25 KG 6,430 $4,854,445.60 $754.97

CSB SUPER CEREAL PLUS BOX-10/1.5 KG 4,990 $11,651,725.97 $2,334.99

FLOUR, ALL PURPOSE BAG-50 KG 100 $61,729.00 $617.29

LENTILS BAG-50 KG 4,750 $3,544,399.70 $746.19

OIL, SOYBEAN, CRUDE, DEGUMMED BULK 10,610 $16,719,380.00 $1,575.81

OIL, SUNFLOWERSEED CAN-6/4 L 160 $489,318.46 $3,057.80

OIL, VEGETABLE BOTTLE, PLS-6/4 L 670-719 910 $1,814,799.00 $1,994.01

OIL, VEGETABLE CAN-6/4 L 9,530 $21,791,916.07 $2,286.55

OIL, VEGETABLE PAIL-20 L 320 $876,166.66 $2,737.68

PEAS, GREEN, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 7,040 $4,164,441.90 $591.54

PEAS, GREEN, WHOLE BAG-50 KG 220 $102,671.80 $466.69

PEAS, YELLOW, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 30,530 $19,608,595.30 $642.27

PEAS, YELLOW, WHOLE BAG-50 KG 1,480 $775,742.00 $524.15

RICE, 2/7 MG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 180 $120,420.00 $669.00

RICE, 3/15 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 900 $514,404.00 $571.56

RICE, 3/15 MG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 50 $28,766.00 $575.32

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 260 $129,139.40 $496.69

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 12,130 $6,900,076.10 $568.84

RICE, 5/20 MG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 3,410 $1,757,208.10 $515.31

RICE, MILLED BULK 78,640 $43,568,132.80 $554.02

SORGHUM BAG-50 KG 5,430 $1,983,080.00 $365.21

SORGHUM BULK 106,600 $33,223,262.00 $311.66

SOYBEAN MEAL BULK 43,000 $19,797,800.00 $460.41

WHEAT, HARD RED WINTER BULK 440,770 $119,661,447.00 $271.48

WHEAT, SOFT WHITE BULK 196,230 $61,343,291.20 $312.61

Grand Total 970,011 $379,749,578.16

Commodity Qty in EA PO Value Average Cost

BAGS, WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE- 50 KG 5,754,000 $2,950,346.05 $0.5127
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

I, Geoffrey G. Meyers, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Manor Care, Inc. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
              ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
              Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
              requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
              the Report.

/s/ Geoffrey G. Meyers

Geoffrey G. Meyers
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2003

                                       31