alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1250 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1250

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, as the ``Lucas Lowe Post 
                               Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2019

  Mr. Babin (for himself, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Taylor, Mr. 
Ratcliffe, Mr. Gooden, Mr. Wright, Mr. Green of Texas, Mr. McCaul, Mr. 
Conaway, Ms. Granger, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Gonzalez 
of Texas, Mr. Flores, Mr. Arrington, Mr. Castro of Texas, Mr. Roy, Mr. 
Olson, Mr. Hurd of Texas, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Williams, Mr. Burgess, Mr. 
  Cloud, Mr. Cuellar, Ms. Johnson of Texas, Mr. Carter of Texas, Mr. 
 Allred, Mr. Veasey, Mr. Vela, Mr. Doggett, Mrs. Fletcher, Mr. Brady, 
  Ms. Jackson Lee, and Ms. Garcia of Texas) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, as the ``Lucas Lowe Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LUCAS LOWE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lucas Lowe Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lucas Lowe 
Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1365 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                     February 12, 2020.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
1365) entitled ``An Act to make technical corrections to the Guam World 
War II Loyalty Recognition Act.'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
      following:

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO GUAM WORLD WAR II LOYALTY 
              RECOGNITION ACT.

    Title XVII of division A of Public Law 114-328 is amended--
            (1) in section 1703(e)--
                    (A) by striking ``equal to'' and inserting ``not to 
                exceed''; and
                    (B) by striking ``covered into the Treasury as 
                miscellaneous receipts'' and inserting ``used to 
                reimburse the applicable appropriations'';
            (2) in section 1704(a) by striking ``, subject to the 
        availability of appropriations,'' and inserting ``from the 
        Claims Fund''; and
            (3) by striking section 1707(a).

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 1365

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1324 

To improve the national instant criminal background check system in order 

to search the National Data Exchange database when conducting criminal background checks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2019 

Mr. RICE of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To improve the national instant criminal background check 

system in order to search the National Data Exchange 

database when conducting criminal background checks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FBI Access to Speedy 

5 Technology NICS Act’’ or the ‘‘FAST NICS Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1324 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT THAT THE NICS SYSTEM SEARCH 

2 THE NATIONAL DATA EXCHANGE DATABASE 

3 IN CONDUCTING BACKGROUND CHECKS. 

4 Section 103(e)(1) of the Brady Handgun Violence 

5 Prevention Act (34 U.S.C. 40901(e)(1)) is amended by 

6 adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(L) SEARCH OF NATIONAL DATA EX8 CHANGE DATABASE.—The system established 

9 under this section shall search the database of 

10 the National Data Exchange in conducting a 

11 background check under this section.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### 	

     

	

 		  	 
 !"

 	
	
	 		
				 	

 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	  
	
						
					  
	
				
		 !	"					
#

 $		
				
	
							 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	  	 	 	 	  	
		
	 %		

					!

Model Year: 2007

Model: Range Rover 4.4L V8 naturally aspirated

Test Group: 7LRXT04.2001

VIN Range: SALMF15457A233807 - SALMF154X7A263532

Total Vehicles: 5158


 !"	#	!

& $	 	 
	 	 
	 
	 	 	  '													

 
			
!

$
%&%''(')! 
 !"	#	!

( $		
			
			
					 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	 	  
!

*+%',+!*!-./ '
&' '& ),!

) $		
						
	
				
 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 *	 
	  
		
		
						
		 		%	
										
	

!

)('!

 $		 
	 		 		 
	
		 	 	 	 	  	
		

!	"				
					
 						

				
	 	
				
		
				
	
		 	
			!

,&0

'

%%%! 

### EPA VERR# 4220 Received: April 29, 2011

### 	

     

	

 		  + ,
				
		
								
	 				-	
		
		
		 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 -	 
	 	 
	  
			
		
!

0%&)
')(*+%!

. "		
			
	
 							!  1
(& ''!

/ $		 
	 	 
	
		 	
		 	 	 	 % 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	  			
			%	
	
						  	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 %	 
	 	  	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  										
			%	 			!


0%!

0 "	 	 
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  
			 			!

 !"	#	!

1 $		
			
					
		
 	

	
				 
						!

'
'(%)((!

 $		
	
													 
		!  

### EPA VERR# 4220 Received: April 29, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Capstead
Securities Corporation IV's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 734,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               32
<BONDS>                                        721,063
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   734,645
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,786
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    359
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                359
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       359
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Helen Maxie, Appellant, v John A. Fernandez-Miranda, Respondent.

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered on or about January 14, 1991, which dissolved an ex parte temporary restraining order granted August 15, 1990 enjoining defendant, from enforcing an order of the Circuit Court of the County of Henrico, Virginia, dated July 23, 1990, directed plaintiff to return the parties’ son to Virginia to await that Court’s decision of the child’s custody proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS court that the Virginia courts should determine whether these proceedings should continue in New York or Virginia. In this regard, we note that a court should not exercise jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (Domestic Relations Law § 75-a *et seq.)*where the plaintiff has violated a court decree relating to custody (Domestic Relations Law § 75-i), and that the courts of Virginia have previously exercised jurisdiction in this matter, and directed the plaintiff to return the child to Virginia for a determination as to custody on July 23, 1990, the very day this proceeding was commenced. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1421 

To repeal debt collection amendments made by the Bipartisan Budget Act 

of 2015, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2019 

Ms. ESHOO (for herself, Mr. COOPER, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. 

THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. CASE, and Mr. RASKIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal debt collection amendments made by the 

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Help Americans Never 

5 Get Unwanted Phone calls Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘HANG6 UP Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1421 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DEBT COLLECTION AMENDMENTS; 

2 CLARIFYING COVERAGE WITH RESPECT TO 

3 GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Communications Act of 1934 

5 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) is amended— 

6 (1) in section 3, by striking paragraph (39) and 

7 inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(39) PERSON.—The term ‘person’— 

9 ‘‘(A) includes an individual, partnership, 

10 association, joint-stock company, trust, or cor11 poration; and 

12 ‘‘(B) for the purposes of section 227, in13 cludes a contractor of the United States Gov14 ernment with respect to a call that is made 

15 solely to collect a debt owed to or guaranteed 

16 by the United States.’’; and 

17 (2) in section 227(b)— 

18 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

19 (i) in subparagraph (A)(iii), by strik20 ing ‘‘, unless such call is made solely to 

21 collect a debt owed to or guaranteed by the 

22 United States’’; and 

23 (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

24 ‘‘, is made solely pursuant to the collection 

25 of a debt owed to or guaranteed by the 

26 United States,’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1421 IH

1 (B) in paragraph (2)— 

2 (i) in subparagraph (F)(ii), by adding 

3 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

4 (ii) in subparagraph (G)(ii), by strik5 ing ‘‘; and’’ at the end and inserting a pe6 riod; and 

7 (iii) by striking subparagraph (H). 

8 (b) REGULATIONS.—Section 301(b) of the Bipartisan 

9 Budget Act of 2015 (47 U.S.C. 227 note; Public Law 

10 114–74) is repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
DENY; and Opinion Filed April 1 9 , 2018 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00382 - CV IN RE PETER BEASLEY , Relator Original Proceeding from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296 - 05741 - 2017 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright

Opinion by Justice Brown In this original proceeding, relator complains of the trial court’s order granting t he real parties in interest’s motion to transfer venue to Dallas County. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator is not entitled to the relief requested. First, the order complained of is not subject to appellate or mandamus review. The real partie s in interest moved to transfer venue pursuant to section 15.002(b) of the civil practice and remedies code, and the trial court granted the motion to transfer without stating a reason. Section 15.002(c) of the civil practice and remedies code prohibits a ppellate or mandamus review of the granting of a motion to transfer venue brought under section 15.002(b)

. T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § 15.002(c) (West 2017)

. Where, as here, the motion to transfer sufficiently invoked– 2

–

subsection (b) in requesting a transfer and the trial court did not give a reason for granting the transfer requ e st, the order granting the transfer is statutorily beyond our review

. E.g. In re Coastal Alamo Invs

. , LLC , No. 04

- 16

- 00455

- CV, 2016 WL 4444384, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antoni o Aug. 24, 2016, orig

. proceeding ) (denying mandamus relief where venue transferred pursuant to 15.002(b)); see also Trend Offset Printing Servs., Inc. v. Collin County Cmty. College Dist. , 249 S.W.3d 429, 430 (Tex. 2008) (per curiam); Jones v. Pioneer/Eclipse Corp. , No. 05

- 08

- 00446

- CV, 2009 WL 1395932, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas May 20, 2009, pet. denied) (mem. op.)

. Further, to the extent the order granting the transfer was not based on section 15.002(b), relator has an adequate remedy on appeal because such rulings ar e generally subject to appellate review and none of the limited exceptions to that general rule apply here. See Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Thirteenth Court of Appeals , 929 S.W.2d 440, 441 (Tex. 1996) (a n appellate remedy is gene rally adequate to correc t improper venue determinations); Polaris Inv. Management Corp. v. Abascal , 892 S.W.2d 860, 862 (Tex. 1995) (“Texas law is quite clear that venue determinations are not reviewable by mandamus.”). Accordingly, we deny relator ’s petit ion for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

180382F.P05 /Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE IX

EMPLOYMENT

EMPLOYMENT

Article 148

(ex Article 128 TEC)

(ex Article 128 TEC)

1.   The European Council shall each year consider the employment situation in the Union and adopt conclusions thereon, on the basis of a joint annual report by the Council and the Commission.

2.   On the basis of the conclusions of the European Council, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the Employment Committee referred to in Article 150, shall each year draw up guidelines which the Member States shall take into account in their employment policies. These guidelines shall be consistent with the broad guidelines adopted pursuant to Article 121(2).

3.   Each Member State shall provide the Council and the Commission with an annual report on the principal measures taken to implement its employment policy in the light of the guidelines for employment as referred to in paragraph 2.

4.   The Council, on the basis of the reports referred to in paragraph 3 and having received the views of the Employment Committee, shall each year carry out an examination of the implementation of the employment policies of the Member States in the light of the guidelines for employment. The Council, on a recommendation from the Commission, may, if it considers it appropriate in the light of that examination, make recommendations to Member States.

5.   On the basis of the results of that examination, the Council and the Commission shall make a joint annual report to the European Council on the employment situation in the Union and on the implementation of the guidelines for employment.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CB Richard Ellis RealtyTrust (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”), I, Laurie Romanak, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

May 15, 2007 

 

35
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Noordin Bhamani and * From the 67th District Court

Nooruddin T. “Nick” Bhamani, of Tarrant County,

Trial Court No. 067-249329-10.

Vs. No. 11-13-00041-CV * April 16, 2015

Citizens Enterprises, Inc. and * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

Mohammad Siddique, (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason 

of this appeal are taxed against Noordin Bhamani and Nooruddin T. “Nick” 

Bhamani.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000015511
<NAME> THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      613<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                        71<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        212
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,371<F1>
<PP&E>                                          25,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,310<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,211<F1>
<BONDS>                                          4,729
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,310<F1>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,643
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,444
<INCOME-TAX>                                       545
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                899
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       899
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>RESTATEMENT REFLECTED HEREIN IS THE RESULT OF RECLASSIFICATIONS TO PRIOR
PERIODS' FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO CONFORM TO THE CURRENT PERIOD PRESENTATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
opposition to a motion must be filed within ten days after service of the 

motion and that the district court may construe a party's failure to oppose 

a motion as an admission that the motion is meritorious and a consent to 

granting the motion); see also Walls v. Brewster, 112 Nev. 175, 178, 912 

P.2d 261, 263 (1996). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

-?L A 

J. 

Sa 

J. 

Gibbons 

Pickering 

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge 

Carolyn Worrell, Settlement Judge 

Day & Nance 

Marquis Aurbach Coifing 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

...continued 

the argument for the first time on appeal. Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. Brown, 

97 Nev. 49, 52, 623 P.2d 981, 983 (1981). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 4(041(9