alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(b)

                         OPINION AND CONSENT OF ACTUARY
<PAGE>

                [Transamerica Life Insurance Company Letterhead]

April 30, 2002


Transamerica Life Insurance Company
4333 Edgewood Road NE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa  52499-0001

Re:      Transamerica Preferred Advantage
         Separate Account VA L
         Registration on Form N-4

Dear Sir/Madam:

With regard to the above registration statement, I have examined such documents
and made such inquiries as I have deemed necessary and appropriate, and on the
basis of such examination, have the following opinions:

Fees and charges deducted under the Transamerica Preferred Advantage policies
are those deemed necessary to appropriately reflect:

(1)      the expenses incurred in the acquisition and distribution of the
         policies,

(2)      the expenses associated with the development and servicing of the
         policies,

(3)      the assumption of certain risks arising from the operation and
         management of the policies and/or riders to the policy and that
         provides for a reasonable margin of profit.

Fees and charges assessed against the policy values in the variable account
include:

(i)      Service Charge and Administrative Charge

(ii)     Mortality and Expense Risk Fee (M&E)

(iii)    Taxes (including premium and other taxes if applicable)

(iv)     Surrender Charges

(v)      Any applicable rider fees or charges
<PAGE>

Transamerica Life Insurance Company
April 30, 2002
Page 2


The magnitude of each of the individual charges listed above in (i) through (v)
is established in the pricing of the Transamerica Preferred Advantage, to
achieve a reasonable Return on Investment (ROI), which is within the range of
industry practice with respect to comparable variable annuity products.

Except by coincidence, it is not expected that actual charges assessed in a
given year would exactly offset actual expenses incurred. Acquisition expenses
(as well as major product and/or systems development expenses) are incurred "up
front" and recovered, with a reasonable profit margin, through future years'
charges. In addition, the company cannot increase certain charges under the
policies in the pricing process.

Therefore, in my opinion, the fees and charges deducted under the policies, in
the aggregate, are reasonable in relation to the services rendered, the expenses
expected to be incurred, and the risks assumed by the company.

I hereby consent to the use of this opinion, which is included as an Exhibit to
the registration statement.



     /s/ R. Gene Hauser
------------------------------------------
R. Gene Hauser
Associate Actuary
Transamerica Life Insurance Company
CCA # 09-14-00190-CR

STYLE:

David Lee Victorick

v. The State of Texas

O30-I5"

ELECTRONIC RECORD

TRIAL COURT:

TRIAL COURT #:

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Judge Michael Seiler

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED

435th District Court

OFFENSE: Solicitation of a Child

PUNISHMENT: 5 years

COUNTY: Montgomery

MOTION

FOR REHEARING IS:

DATE:

JUDGE:

13-11-12323 CR

DATE:

JUSTICE:

PUBLISH:

12-10-14

LeanneJohnson

"yes

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APP BR:

05-19-14

05-15-14

10-20-14

08-20-14

PC NO S YES

DNP: NO

SUPPCLKRECORD:

SUPPRPTRECORD:

SUPP BR:

PRO SE BR:

O 30 -/r

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD CCA # PD-0030-15

APPELLAMT^ Petition Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

JUDGE:

DATE: Olb91MJjJUDGE: fM UUM4*^-

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

CCA IS: ON

JUDGE:

ON

JUDGE:
**EXHIBIT32.2**

BRIGGS &STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

2006 Annual Reporton Form 10-K

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Briggs & Stratton Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 2, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JamesE. Brenn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ James E. Brenn      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| James E. Brenn          |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| September 1, 2006       |   |

 

Thiscertification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
ELECTRONIC RECORD

02-14-00068-CR AGGRAVATED ROBBERY

02-14-00069-CR AGGRAVATED ASSAULT

COA# 02-14-00070-CR OFFENSE: ATT. AGG. KIDNAPPING

STYLE: jones, rory COUNTY: Denton

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 211th District Court

DATE: 11/20/14

F-2014-0079-C, F-2014-0080-C & FPublish:NO TC CASE #: 2014-0081-C

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS . m*-^ +ms /*74*/«f f47T/V

STYLE: JONES, RORY v.

PRo se Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: S/flZO/Z

JUDGE: -?%4, UAAjUfis\ ,

CCA#: u yg»/v

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PRO se

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE: f°^ /4/>r;?)£J 2<?/*~

PC:.

DNP:

MOTION FOR

cf*-n See/

ELECTRONIC RECORD
FIT F COPY OFFICIALNOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS ' ,LjL ^XJl '

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

4/16/2015 f|{ \ill 111 COA No. 02-14-00068-CR

JONES, RORY Tr.efcNoT[E;2014-00f9-C PD-1676-14

Pursuant to Rule 69.4(a) T.R.AP>th@'^eejorfe%eturned to the court of appeals. -^sazntf**- Abe, Acosta C|erk

2ND COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

DEBRASPISAK

401 W. BELKNAP, STE 9000

FORT WORTH, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1424 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure the Secretary of Veterans Affairs permits the display of Fallen 

Soldier Displays in national cemeteries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1424 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Warrior Battle3 field Cross Memorial Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR FALLEN SOLDIER DISPLAYS 

5 IN NATIONAL CEMETERIES. 

6 Section 2403 of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section: 

9 ‘‘(d)(1) Subject to standards established by the Sec10 retary, the Secretary shall permit the display of a Fallen 

11 Soldier Display in any national cemetery. 

12 ‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘Fallen Soldier Dis13 play’ means a memorial monument in honor of fallen 

14 members of the Armed Forces that may include a replica 

15 of an inverted rifle, boots, helmets, and identification 

16 tag.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 12, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1424 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure 

teries. play of Fallen Soldier Displays in national cemethe Secretary of Veterans Affairs permits the dis-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,869                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,773                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,943                       0
<PP&E>                                         256,825                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (43,853)                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,500                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,817                       0
<BONDS>                                        305,853                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     41,159                       0
<COMMON>                                           163                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (135,698)                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,500                       0
<SALES>                                         23,417                  12,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,676                  13,206
<CGS>                                           17,237                   8,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,237                   8,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,727                   9,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,471)                 (4,850)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,471)                 (4,850)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.90)                  (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.90)                  (0.43)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lucas Rodriguez, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, *527Bronx County (George Covington, J.), rendered on June 20, 1989, convicting defendant upon a plea of guilty of two counts of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing defendant to concurrent terms of imprisonment of from 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Briggs &
Stratton Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John S. Shiely, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    John S. Shiely  
|John S. Shiely         
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 27, 2009        

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

Calendar No. 550 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 139 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2020 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 

resource study of the site associated with the 1908 

Springfield Race Riot in the State of Illinois. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Springfield Race Riot 

5 Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESOURCE STUDY OF SPRINGFIELD RACE RIOT. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

8 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of the Interior. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 139 PCS

1 (2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

2 means the archeological site near Madison Street 

3 and the 10th Street Rail Corridor, and other sites 

4 in Springfield, Illinois associated with the 1908 

5 Springfield Race Riot. 

6 (b) SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.— 

7 (1) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a spe8 cial resource study of the study area. 

9 (2) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under 

10 paragraph (1), the Secretary shall— 

11 (A) evaluate the national significance of 

12 the study area; 

13 (B) determine the suitability and feasibility 

14 of designating the study area as a unit of the 

15 National Park System; 

16 (C) consider other alternatives for preser17 vation, protection, and interpretation of the 

18 study area by the Federal Government, State or 

19 local government entities, or private and non20 profit organizations; 

21 (D) consult with interested Federal agen22 cies, State or local governmental entities, pri23 vate and nonprofit organizations, or any other 

24 interested individuals; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 139 PCS

1 (E) identify cost estimates for any Federal 

2 acquisition, development, interpretation, oper3 ation, and maintenance associated with the al4 ternatives. 

5 (3) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required 

6 under paragraph (1) shall be conducted in accord7 ance with section 100507 of title 54, United States 

8 Code. 

9 (4) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the 

10 date on which funds are first made available for the 

11 study under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall sub12 mit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the 

13 House of Representatives and the Committee on En14 ergy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report 

15 that describes— 

16 (A) the results of the study; and 

17 (B) any conclusions and recommendations 

18 of the Secretary. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 550 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 139 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct 

of Illinois. with the 1908 Springfield Race Riot in the State a special resource study of the site associated 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2020 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Disease and Economic Burden of Exposure to Arsenic in

Drinking Water

Abt Associates

2014

D ocument is undergoing final review and will b e available in

the docket at a later date
Exhibit 16

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549



March 28, 2001


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We were previously principal accountants for Florida Progress Corporation (FPC)
and Florida Power Corporation (Florida Power) and, under the date of
February 15, 2001, we reported on the financial statements of FPC and
subsidiaries and Florida Power as of and for the years ended December 31, 2000
and 1999. On March 28, 2001, our appointment as principal accountants was
terminated. We have read FPC's and Florida Power's statements included under
Item 9 of their December 31, 2000 combined Form 10-K, and we agree with such
statements, except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree with FPC's
and Florida Power's statements that the change was approved by the audit
committee of the board of directors and that Deloitte & Touche LLP was not
consulted regarding any of the matters or events set forth in Item 304(a)(2) of
Regulation S-K.


Very truly yours,



/s/KPMG LLP
-----------
KPMG LLP
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Courtney C. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of Specialty Underwriters Alliance, Inc. (the
Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as
follows: (i) The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (ii) The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 16th day of May 2005. /s/ Courtney C. SmithCourtney C. SmithChief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Specialty
Underwriters Alliance, Inc. and will be retained by Specialty Underwriters Alliance, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Lawrence Greenberg, Respondent, v Ronald J. Rosenberg, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

—In an action to recover damages, *inter alia,*for malicious prosecution and false arrest, the defendant Ronald J. Rosenberg appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), dated May 11, 1989, as, after a hearing, denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellant is granted.

In order to avoid his claim being time barred by the Statute of Limitations, the plaintiff was required to serve the appel*602lant on or before December 23, 1986 *(see,*CPLR 203 [a], [b] [1]; CPLR 215 [3]). In this case, the plaintiff attempted to accomplish service by delivery and mailing pursuant to CPLR 308 (2). Although the summons and complaint were delivered to a person of suitable age and discretion at the appellant’s place of business on December 22, 1986, process was not mailed until December 24, 1986, initially to the wrong address, and again on January 16, 1987, to the correct address.

Owing to the failure to complete both steps required under CPLR 308 (2) on or before December 23, 1986, the action is time barred against the appellant *(see, Matter of Zaretski v Tutunjian,*133 AD2d 928, 929; *see also, Furey v Milgrom,*44 AD2d 91, 91-93; Siegel, NY Prac § 72, at 95, n 16 [2d ed]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
United States Agricultural 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Agricultural Department of Marketing Room 2648-S, Mail Stop 0268

Marketing Agriculture Service Washington, D.C. 20250-0268

Service

1

July 24, 2015

MEMORANDUM TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIC STANDARDS BOARD 

FROM: Miles V. McEvoy

Deputy Administrator

Agricultural Marketing Service

National Organic Program (NOP)

SUBJECT: Biodegradable Biobased Mulch Film

On January 22, 2015, the National Organic Program (NOP) published Policy Memo 15-1, 

Biodegradable Biobased Mulch Film. The policy memo clarifies how biodegradable biobased 

mulch film should be reviewed by certifying agents and material evaluation programs for 

compliance with the USDA organic regulations. 

In response to a recommendation of the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), 

biodegradable biobased mulch film was added to the National List on October 30, 2014 (79 FR 

58655). The USDA organic regulations include a definition of biodegradable biobased mulch 

film and include additional criteria for biodegradable biobased mulch film.

Several stakeholders have notified the NOP that there are no products currently on the market 

that meet the requirements for biobased content that are described in Policy Memo 15-1. In 

response to this feedback, the NOP contracted with the Organic Material Review Institute to 

develop a report that describes the biobased status of commercially available biodegradable 

biobased mulch products and their compliance with the USDA organic regulations.

The report is available for the public on the NOP website for Petitioned Substances. The NOP is 

requesting that the NOSB Crops Subcommittee add the review of this report to its work agenda 

to determine if any additional action is needed by the NOSB.

References

Organic Foods Production Act of 1990, as amended

7 U.S.C. § 6517 National List

USDA Organic Regulations (7 CFR Part 205)

7 C.F.R. § 205.2 Terms Defined.
United States Agricultural 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Agricultural Department of Marketing Room 2648-S, Mail Stop 0268

Marketing Agriculture Service Washington, D.C. 20250-0268

Service

2

Biodegradable biobased mulch film. A synthetic mulch film that meets the following 

criteria:

(1) Meets the compostability specifications of one of the following standards: ASTM 

D6400, ASTM D6868, EN 13432, EN 14995, or ISO 17088 (all incorporated by 

reference; see §205.3);

(2) Demonstrates at least 90% biodegradation absolute or relative to microcrystalline 

cellulose in less than two years, in soil, according to one of the following test methods: 

ISO 17556 or ASTM D5988 (both incorporated by reference; see §205.3); and

(3) Must be biobased with content determined using ASTM D6866 (incorporated by 

reference; see §205.3).

7 C.F.R. § 205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production.

(b) As herbicides, weed barriers, as applicable. 

***

(2) Mulches. 

***

(iii) Biodegradable biobased mulch film as defined in §205.2. Must be produced without 

organisms or feedstock derived from excluded methods.

NOSB Recommendations 

NOSB Recommendation for Biodegradable Biobased Mulch Film.