alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
October 17, 2017

AMENDMENT NO. 3

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION

BULK PRODUCTS FOR FURTHER PROCESSING AUGUST 2012

The purpose of this amendment is to revise the Individual Commodity Specification for Sweet 

Potatoes for Processing. 

The revised text is in blue.

1. Section II. Paragraph C. is revised to read as follows:

Size – Whole sweet potatoes shall be specified not less than 1 3/4 inches to 6 inches

in diameter. Maximum diameter tuber must pass freely through a 6 inch diameter

tube.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Specialty Specialty Crops 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Crops Inspection Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Division Washington, DC 20250-0240
No. 06-14-00099-CV

—————————

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT TEXARKANA

—————————————————————————————————

RICHARD PARKER

Appellant

v.

JOANN PARKER NEAL

Appellee

—————————————————————————————————

On Appeal from the 276th District Court of Camp County

Robert Rolston, Judge Presiding

—————————————————————————————————

APPELLEE’S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

AND DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL

—————————————————————————————————

Appellee JoAnn Neal Parker has been represented in this appeal by her trial

counsel Lance Hinson. Appellee will now also be represented in the Court of

Appeals by the following attorney:

APPELLEE’S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

AND DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL Page 1

ACCEPTED

06-14-00099-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

4/13/2015 10:38:04 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/13/2015 10:38:04 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
Chad M. Ruback

State Bar No. 90001244

The Ruback Law Firm

8117 Preston Road

Suite 300

Dallas, Texas 75225

(214) 522-4243

(214) 522-2191 - facsimile

chad@appeal.pro

Accordingly, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.2, Appellee

requests that Chad M. Ruback be listed as Appellee’s appellate counsel.

And, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.1(b), Appellee

designates the following attorney as her lead counsel on appeal: Chad M. Ruback,

The Ruback Law Firm, 8117 Preston Road, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75225, (214)

522-4243, (214) 522-2191 facsimile, and chad@appeal.pro.

Appellee requests that her lead counsel on appeal, Chad M. Ruback, be given

notice of all filings, settings, and rulings in this appeal.

APPELLEE’S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

AND DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL Page 2
Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Chad M. Ruback

Chad M. Ruback

State Bar No. 90001244

chad@appeal.pro

The Ruback Law Firm

8117 Preston Road

Suite 300

Dallas, Texas 75225

(214) 522-4243

(214) 522-2191 facsimile

chad@appeal.pro

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On April 13, 2015, I served a copy of this document to the following counsel

for Appellant Richard Parker:

Tom S. McCorkle

403 W. Tyler Street

Gilmer, Texas 75644

/s/ Chad M. Ruback

Chad M. Ruback

APPELLEE’S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

AND DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL Page 3
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 0 2 3

- 07 54

_____________________________
E DDIE L EE L ATSON , J R

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

. January 8, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J., and R OWE and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and J asmin e R. Dixon
, Assistant Public Defender
, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody
, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1198 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1198

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 404 South Boulder Highway in Henderson, Nevada, as the ``Henderson 
               Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HENDERSON VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 404 South Boulder Highway in Henderson, Nevada, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Henderson Veterans Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Henderson 
Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1198

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 404 South Boulder Highway in Henderson, Nevada, as the ``Henderson 
               Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.
```
# QuarterlyTruckRatesbyOriginandD
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,736-01

EX PARTE FREDERICK D. ERVIN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 9402JD-HC-1 IN THE 1-A DISTRICT COURT

FROM JASPER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault and sentenced to life imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Applicant has alleged

facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex

parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional

facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960),

the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel
2

to respond to Applicant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims. The trial court may use any

means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether counsel’s

conduct was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make findings and

conclusions as to whether Applicant’s claim is barred by the doctrine of laches. In doing so, the trial

court shall give Applicant an opportunity to respond and explain his delay. Ex parte Smith, 444

S.W.3d 661, 670 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). The trial court shall also make any other findings and

conclusions that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas

corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: April 15, 2015

Do not publish
Updated: December 2023

National Organic Standards Board

NOSB Officers

Kyla Smith, NOSB Chair 

Amy Bruch, NOSB Vice Chair 

Nate Lewis, NOSB Secretary

Executive Committee Representatives

Amy Bruch, Chairperson: Compliance, Accreditation & Certification

Logan Petrey, Chairperson: Crops

Allison Johnson, Chairperson: Handling

Brian Caldwell, Chairperson: Livestock

Franklin Quarcoo, Chairperson: Materials

Nate Lewis, Chairperson: Policy Development

 Subcommittees

COMPLIANCE, ACCREDITATION & 

CERTIFICATION (CACS)

Amy Bruch, Chair 

Allison Johnson, Vice Chair 

Jerry D’Amore

Carolyn Dimitri

Kim Huseman

Nate Lewis

Nate Powell-Palm 

Kyla Smith

CROPS (CS)

Logan Petrey, Chair

Amy Bruch, Vice Chair

Brian Caldwell 

Jerry D’Amore 

Mindee Jeffery 

Nate Lewis

Franklin Quarcoo 

Wood Turner 

Javier Zamora

HANDLING (HS) 

Allison Johnson, Chair

Nate Lewis, Vice Chair

Jerry D’Amore 

Carolyn Dimitri

Kim Huseman 

Dilip Nandwani 

Logan Petrey

Kyla Smith

Wood Turner

 LIVESTOCK (LS) 

Brian Caldwell, Chair

Kim Huseman, Vice Chair 

Nate Lewis

Nate Powell-Palm

Franklin Quarcoo

MATERIALS/GMO ad hoc (MS) 

Franklin Quarcoo, Chair 

Wood Turner, Vice Chair

Brian Caldwell

Mindee Jeffery 

Nate Lewis

Dilip Nandwani 

Logan Petrey 

Kyla Smith

POLICY DEVELOPMENT (PDS)

Nate Lewis, Chair

Amy Bruch, Vice Chair

Jerry D’Amore

Carolyn Dimitri

Allison Johnson
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1252 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

6531 Van Nuys Boulevard in Van Nuys, California, as the ‘‘Marilyn 

Monroe Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. CA ́RDENAS (for himself, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. 

DESAULNIER, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. AGUILAR, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, 

Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CORREA, Mr. 

PETERS, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. HUNTER, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Mr. 

CARBAJAL, Mr. CISNEROS, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. GARAMENDI, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. ROUDA, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. 

BERA, Mr. COOK, Ms. HILL of California, Mr. LEVIN of California, Mrs. 

DAVIS of California, Ms. WATERS, Ms. BASS, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. 

COSTA, Mrs. TORRES of California, Mr. GOMEZ, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. COX of California, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Ms. 

SA ́NCHEZ, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. SPEIER, and Mr. 

RUIZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard in Van Nuys, California, as the ‘‘Marilyn Monroe Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1252 IH

1 SECTION 1. MARILYN MONROE POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard in 

4 Van Nuys, California, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Marilyn Monroe Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Marilyn Monroe Post 

10 Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth Stastny, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 4, 2008



By:

/s/ Kenneth StastnyKenneth StastnyChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dana Stewart, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a *584judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered April 25, 1989, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict,- and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of felony murder and attempted robbery in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. The codefendant testified that the defendant joined him and two others, and that all four men discussed going to the Ravenswood housing projects in Long Island City, Queens, to collect money from the victim which the victim owed to one of the men. The four men, including the defendant, agreed to use force, if necessary, in order to achieve their objective. In his statement to the police, the defendant, although indicating that "it was not part of the plan”, admitted that he intended to take the victim’s money after the victim was beaten up. The codefendant further testified that the defendant stated they would "put [the victim] in a bag”, i.e., they would kill him, if he gave them any trouble. Thus, the testimony of the codefendant, taken together with the defendant’s statement, established that the defendant intended to steal the victim’s money after he had been beaten or killed. Consequently, since the defendant’s act of shooting the victim was conduct which tended to effect the commission of the crime of robbery *(see,*Penal Law § 110.00), the crime of attempted robbery was complete, and it is irrelevant that after the shooting, the defendant did not take any money or other property from the victim *(see, People v Bracey,*41 NY2d 296; *People v Eddy,*95 AD2d 956). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We also find that the trial court did not err in denying defense counsel’s request to charge manslaughter in the second degree and criminally negligent homicide as lesser-included offenses of the intentional murder count. Viewed in a light most favorable to the defendant *(see, People v Martin,*59 NY2d 704; *People v Henderson,*41 NY2d 233), there was no reasonable view of the evidence which would support a finding that the defendant committed one of the lesser offenses, but did not commit intentional murder *(cf., People v Green,*56 NY2d 427).

*585Finally, we find that the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive and we decline to reduce it in the interest of justice *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 1439

ERICK DANILO MARTINEZ GONZALEZ , Petitioner ,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : September 30, 2021 Decided: November 4, 2021

Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jay S. Marks, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anthony P. Nicastro, Assistant Director, Matthew B. George, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED S TATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Erick Danilo Martinez G onzalez , a native and citizen of El Salvador, petition s for
review of an order of the Boa rd of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge ’ s (“IJ”) decision denying Gonzalez’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We deny the petition for review. We have reviewed the administrative record, including the transcript of the merits hearing and all supporting evidence, and considered the arguments pressed on appeal in conjunction with the record and the relevant authorities. We first conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency ’ s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) , and that substantial evidence supports the IJ ’s dispositive ruling,
af firmed by the Board, that Gonzalez failed to show the requisite nexus to a protected ground. See Cortez

- Mendez v. Whitaker , 912 F.3d 205, 209 (4th Cir. 2019) (“Whether a

person ’ s persecution shares a nexus with h is alleged protected ground is a question of fact
entitled to defere nce and reviewed for clear error.”).
W ith regard to the denial of Gonzalez’s claim for CAT relief, we conclude that: (1) substantial evidence supports the relevant factual findings, see Nasrallah v. Barr , 140 S.
Ct. 1683 , 1 692 (2020) ; and (2) the agency committed no legal error in its adjudication of
Gonzalez’s CAT claim . Lastly, we conclude that the Board did not err in determining that
the IJ’s decision did not need to be vacated because the IJ listed the incorrect charge of removability on the first page of the decision

.3 Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re Gonzalez (B.I.A. Mar. 22, 2021 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are a dequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
a ^i , «

btv-j^ . . ooubeofcpdmmipppems

/L,-k*j7^. ~?t?il

vjfrdU^JLOj^

JS&L U-4%C EtMdrfiJ*.—feyc^jjjj^&fijyi^jry fc&f/&*^-

M^gj^ji/dkHiJl-

/!&&r ^/arVLj -±****^/ -^

Gt/?t&( ij£~h *f*v<^ £itd( /Z/&4S / JT J</*uJ?

/

fis&sjuca^&dxL ^dhn^ZLZtg—

yRa*MjjL.fr- dUl -^

M*a~* SLfl4- *- /77<0 Y2SL

fr^MtA //[, A^&tsA3S>^ Ct^/T"

JM2/ /=/A SSS.Z.

ml* yzz,* ?f<tey

*<*•/£kr
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

AURELIO REBOLLAR-ALARCON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-10261

D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01934-DGC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Linda R. Reade, District Judge, Presiding**

Submitted April 7, 2015*** 

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

 

Aurelio Rebollar-Alarcon appeals from the district court’s judgment and

FILED

APR 14 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 

** The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 

 
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for reentry of a

removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rebollar-Alarcon’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there

are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 

We have provided Rebollar-Alarcon the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-10261
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1266 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require firearm assembly kits 

to be considered to be firearms. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. ESPAILLAT (for himself, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. COHEN, 

Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. 

NORTON, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, and Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require firearm 

assembly kits to be considered to be firearms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ghost Guns Are Guns 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FIREARM ASSEMBLY KITS CONSIDERED TO BE 

7 FIREARMS. 

8 Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1266 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘or (D) any 

2 destructive device’’ and inserting ‘‘; (D) any destruc3 tive device; or (E) any combination of parts designed 

4 or intended for use in converting any device into a 

5 firearm and from which a firearm may be readily as6 sembled’’; and 

7 (2) in paragraph (4)— 

8 (A) by adding ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub9 paragraph (A); 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub11 paragraph (B) and inserting a period; and 

12 (C) by striking subparagraph (C). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS