alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                   Exhibit 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


                  KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below, being a member of the Board of Directors of California
Microwave, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby constitutes and appoints Frederick D.
Lawrence and George L. Spillane, and each of them, as his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign on his
behalf the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June
30, 1997, and to execute any amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, with the full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing necessary or advisable to be done in
connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could
do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and
agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

DATED:  July 24, 1997



/s/ Edward E. David, Jr.                    /s/ David B. Leeson
-----------------------                     -----------------------
EDWARD E. DAVID, JR.                        DAVID B. LEESON


/s/ Alfred M. Gray                          /s/ Arthur H. Hausman
-----------------------                     -----------------------
ALFRED M. GRAY                              ARTHUR H. HAUSMAN


/s/ William B. Marx, Jr.                    /s/ Terry W. Ward
-----------------------                     -----------------------
WILLIAM B. MARX, Jr.                        TERRY W. WARD


/s/ Frederick W. Whitridge, Jr.             /s/ J.J. Adorjan
-----------------------                     -----------------------
FREDERICK W. WHITRIDGE, JR.                 J. J. ADORJAN
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350



(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the periodic report of Dynegy Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick J. Caruso, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 4, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    NICK J. CARUSO
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Nick J. Caruso                                      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynegy Inc. and will be retained by Dynegy Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CertificationOf Periodic Report**

 

I,Marvin F. Romanow, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nexen Inc., aCanadian Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                      theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedDecember 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                      theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   February 20,  2009 | /s/ Marvin F. Romanow |
|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                                      |                  | Marvin F. Romanow |
|                                      |                  | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.

 

1

----
# EUR-Lex - 12012M019 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M019

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE III: PROVISIONS ON THE INSTITUTIONS - Article 19 **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0027 - 0027 *

Article 19

1. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall include the Court of Justice, the General Court and specialised courts. It shall ensure that in the interpretation and application of the Treaties the law is observed.

Member States shall provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law.

2. The Court of Justice shall consist of one judge from each Member State. It shall be assisted by Advocates-General.

The General Court shall include at least one judge per Member State.

The Judges and the Advocates-General of the Court of Justice and the Judges of the General Court shall be chosen from persons whose independence is beyond doubt and who satisfy the conditions set out in Articles 253 and 254 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. They shall be appointed by common accord of the governments of the Member States for six years. Retiring Judges and Advocates-General may be reappointed.

3. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall, in accordance with the Treaties:

(a) rule on actions brought by a Member State, an institution or a natural or legal person;

(b) give preliminary rulings, at the request of courts or tribunals of the Member States, on the interpretation of Union law or the validity of acts adopted by the institutions;

(c) rule in other cases provided for in the Treaties.

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000016160
<NAME> CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-29-1999
<CASH>                                          36,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     38,353
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,939
<PP&E>                                         184,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,438
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              176
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   213,682
<SALES>                                        287,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               287,954
<CGS>                                          242,022
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,987
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,080
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39


</TABLE>
# C_2016202EN.01005201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/52

---

Article 5

1.   The Member States shall coordinate their economic policies within the Union. To this end, the Council shall adopt measures, in particular broad guidelines for these policies.

Specific provisions shall apply to those Member States whose currency is the euro.

2.   The Union shall take measures to ensure coordination of the employment policies of the Member States, in particular by defining guidelines for these policies.

3.   The Union may take initiatives to ensure coordination of Member States' social policies.

---
OMB No. 0581-0125 

 Exp. 10/31/2026

SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION 

VENDOR FORM 

TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE ORIGINATING OFFICE 

CHECK ONE: ☐ NEW APPLICANT ☐ UPDATING EXISTING APPLICANT INFORMATION 

DATE: PACA LICENSE NUMBER: 

ORIGINATING OFFICE (include office # and state): APPLICANT NUMBER (IF NEW LEAVE BLANK): 

APPLICANT NAME: CONTACTS: 

ADDRESS (STREET ADDRESS REQUIRED): CITY STATE: ZIP: 

BILLING ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT THAN STREET ADDRESS): CITY: STATE: ZIP: 

DOING BUSINESS AS (Use this section if certificate recipient is different to the person above): 

PHONE: FAX: 

EMAIL: TAX ID NUMBER (REQUIRED): 

☐ SCENARIO A: AN APPLICANT THAT IS NOT LISTED IN THE FEIRS/BIIS GLOBAL LIST OF APPLICANTS.

☐ SCENARIO B: AN APPLICANT THAT IS LISTED IN THE GLOBAL FEIRS/BIIS DATABASE, BUT DOES NOT HAVE AN ACCOUNT NUMBER FOR

THE LOCAL OFFICE. 

APPLICANT WILL BE A: DATE SENT TO SERVICE CENTER OR BILLING STAFF: 

☐ BILLING ☐ COD

TO BE FILLED OUT BY SERVICE CENTER OR BILLING STAFF 

DATE RECEIVED: FMMI NUMBER: 

APPLICANT NUMBER GENERATED (LIST NUMBER HERE): NOTES: 

DATE ENTERED INTO FEIRS/BIIS & FMMI: 

DATE ORIGINATING OFFICE NOTIFIED APP. IS IN FEIRS/BIIS & FMMI: 

SC-430 (01/2024) Destroy previous editions. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
Completion Instructions for Submittal of the Specialty Crops Inspection (SCI) Division Vendor Form for

Audit Services

All applicants choosing to have a USDA specialty crops must follow the following steps to set up or update 

their account with the USDA billing office prior to the scheduling or completion of the audit service. 

1. Complete the SCI Division Vendor Form SC-430. See the attached example for how to complete the 

form. 

2. Send the form to SCI Division Audit Services Branch (ASB) using one of the following methods: 

a. Email to SCReimbursement@usda.gov 

b. Fax to 866-230-9168 

c. Mail to: 

USDA, AMS, SCI, ASB 

1400 Independence Avenue, 

SW Stop 0247, Room 1566-S 

Washington, DC 20250-0247 

Please note that, while the bill will not be issued until after certification or audit documentation is completed, 

failure to set up an account or to pay the USDA bill will be reason to cancel the USDA audit certification. 

If you have any questions, please contact the Audit Services Branch at 202-720-5021 or 

SCAudits@usda.gov 

Issued: February 20, 2019 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Example

SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION

VENDOR FORM

TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE ORIGINATING OFFICE

CHECK ONE: ☐ NEW APPLICANT ☐ UPDATING EXISTING APPLICANT INFORMATION

DATE: PACA LICENSE NUMBER:

October 1, 2018 N/A

ORIGINATING OFFICE (include office # and state): APPLICANT NUMBER (IF NEW LEAVE BLANK):

N/A

APPLICANT NAME: CONTACTS: 

John Smith Farm and Market John Smith

ADDRESS (STREET ADDRESS REQUIRED): CITY STATE: ZIP:

123 Farm and Market Road Anywhere NY 12345

BILLING ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT THAN STREET ADDRESS): CITY: STATE: ZIP:

P.O. Box 123 Anywhere NY 12345

DOING BUSINESS AS (Use this section if certificate recipient is different to the person above):

PHONE: FAX:

100-222-3456 100-222-3457

EMAIL: TAX ID NUMBER (REQUIRED):

johnsmith@farmandmarket.com 10-12345678

☐ SCENARIO A: AN APPLICANT THAT IS NOT LISTED IN THE FEIRS/BIIS GLOBAL LIST OF APPLICANTS.

☐ SCENARIO B: AN APPLICANT THAT IS LISTED IN THE GLOBAL FEIRS/BIIS DATABASE, BUT DOES NOT HAVE AN ACCOUNT NUMBER FOR

THE LOCAL OFFICE.

APPLICANT WILL BE A: DATE SENT TO SERVICE CENTER OR BILLING STAFF:

☐ BILLING ☐ COD September 28, 2018

TO BE FILLED OUT BY SERVICE CENTER OR BILLING STAFF

DATE RECEIVED: FMMI NUMBER: 

APPLICANT NUMBER GENERATED (LIST NUMBER HERE): NOTES:

For audit services, submit the form via one of these methods:

- by email to SCReimbursement@usda.gov

- by fax to 866-230-9168

- by mail to:

USDA, AMS, SCI, ASB

1400 Independence Avenue, SW

Room 1566-S, Stop 0247

Washington, DC 20250-0247

DATE ENTERED INTO FEIRS/BIIS & FMMI:

DATE ORIGINATING OFFICE NOTIFIED APP. IS IN FEIRS/BIIS & FMMI:

SC-430 (09/18) USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00263-CV

NICHOLAS C. DANIELS AND 

ROWENA DANIELS

APPELLANTS

V.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN 

MORTGAGE CORPORATION

APPELLEE

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. CV-2013-00168

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellants Nicholas C. Daniels and Rowena Daniels attempt to appeal 

from a judgment awarding possession of real property at 4009 Crestwood Drive, 

Carrollton, Denton County, Texas to Appellee Federal Home Loan Mortgage 

Corporation as well as from the trial court’s postjudgment order denying their 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

amended motion to dismiss the trial court case for lack of jurisdiction. In our 

February 26, 2015 order, this court stated the following,

We . . . note that Appellee asserts it took possession of the 

property pursuant to the final judgment at issue in this appeal and a 

writ of possession issued out of the County Court at Law on August 

19, 2014. . . . Therefore, we continue to question whether 

Appellants’ appeal has been rendered moot. See Wilhelm v. Fed. 

Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n, 349 S.W.3d 766, 768 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th 

Dist.] 2011, no pet.) (“[A]n appeal from the forcible-detainer 

judgment is moot unless the defendant asserts ‘a potentially 

meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession of the 

(premises).’”). The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have now 

been filed, and, before ordering briefs on the merits to be filed in this 

appeal, we find it necessary to revisit the issues of (1) whether the 

appeal is moot because Appellants no longer have possession of 

the property, and (2) whether Appellants are asserting a potentially 

meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession.

The court requests Appellants to file, on or before Monday, 

March 9, 2015, a brief of no more than ten (10) pages, doublespaced, on why this appeal should not be dismissed as moot for the 

reason that Appellants have previously surrendered possession and 

Appellee now has possession of the property pursuant to execution 

of the writ of possession out of the County Court at Law No. 2. 

Appellants’ failure to file the requested brief by Monday, March 9, 

2015, may result in their appeal being dismissed for failure to comply 

with this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

We have received no response. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 16, 2015

 2

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).
April 14, 2015

John R. Soard

38 Delsie Street

Clarksville, AR 72830

(479) 739-5512

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

Twelfth Court of Appeal

1517 West Front Street, Suite 3564

Tyler, Texas 75702

F1UD IN COURT OF APPEALS

12ih Court of Appeals District

CATHY S. LUSK, C

RE: Case Number 12-14-00211-CV

Trial Court Case No. 3-42005, 3-42004, 3-42003, 3-41396 and CCL-11-13178

Style: John R. Soard

v.

Terry Thorn, Sheila Smith, Mary Page and BJeffery Doran

Dear Ms. McClenny:

This isin response to your letter stating the Appellant's briefin the above-referenced

case was due to have been filed on April 6, 2015.

I have notified you several times that Janice Staples and MistyMcAdams have not filed

the records requested in my designation of recordsfiled on February 18, 2014. (Clerk's rec p29)

According to TRAP 38.6, The Appellant must file a brief within 30 days after the last

records were filed.

On March 18, 2015,1 filed a Motion requesting that the TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

require that the missing files be supplied.

THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN DENIED . The Twelfth Court of Appeals has also denied my

request that I be allowed to supplement the files.

Ifyou direct me to file my brief based on the filesthat have been filed with the court,

and allow me thirty days from the day I am notified, Iwill do my best with what I have.

Very truly yours,

John R. Soard
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

At January 31, 2008, consolidated, wholly-owned subsidiaries of Cascade Corporation were as follows:

Name of Subsidiary

Place of IncorporationCascade Xiamen Forklift Truck Attachment Co., Ltd.

Peoples Republic of ChinaJiahai (Hebei) Forks Co., Ltd.

Peoples Republic of ChinaCascade Hebei Forks Co., Ltd.

Peoples Republic of ChinaCascade (Africa) Pty. Ltd.

South AfricaCascade Korea Limited

South KoreaCascade (U.K.) Limited

United KingdomCascade NV

The NetherlandsCascade (Scandinavia) Hydraulik A.B.

SwedenCascade Hispania S.A.

SpainCascade (France) S.A.R.L.

FranceCascade France MHP, S.A.R.L.

FranceCascade GmbH

GermanyCascade (Japan) Limited

United StatesCascade (Canada) Ltd.

CanadaCascade Kenhar Ltd.

United KingdomCascade Italia S.r.l.

ItalyHyco-Cascade Ltd. (N.Z.)

New ZealandCascade (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

AustraliaCascade IFSC Ltd.

IrelandPSM, LLC

United StatesAmerican Compaction Equipment, Inc.

United States


The
names of certain subsidiaries have been omitted because when considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary they would not, as of January 31, 2008, constitute a
"Significant Subisidiary" as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v *770James Walker, Also Known as Janes Walker, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.), rendered December 8, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Insofar as the defendant challenges the credibility of the prosecution witnesses, we note that the resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). We discern no basis for disturbing the jury’s determination in this case.

Additionally, we find the defendant’s sentence to be neither unduly harsh nor excessive under the circumstances presented *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Kooper, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
# C_2016203EN.01004201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/42

---

Article 164

Enforcement shall be governed by the rules of civil procedure in force in the State in the territory of which it is carried out. The order for its enforcement shall be appended to the decision, without other formality than verification of the authenticity of the decision, by the national authority which the government of each Member State shall designate for this purpose and shall make known to the Commission, to the Court of Justice of the European Union and to the Arbitration Committee set up by Article 18.

When these formalities have been completed on application by the party concerned, the latter may proceed to enforcement in accordance with the national law, by bringing the matter directly before the competent authority.

Enforcement may be suspended only by a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union. However, the courts of the country concerned shall have jurisdiction over complaints that enforcement is being carried out in an irregular manner.

---
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Finlay Enterprises, Inc., (the "Company") does hereby certify with
respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
October 30, 2004 (the "Report") that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: December 9, 2004
                                                  /s/ Arthur E. Reiner
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Arthur E. Reiner
                                                  Chairman, President and Chief
                                                  Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
```