alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
BEIGENE, LTD. SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
2016 SHARE OPTION AND EQUITY PLAN


This Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment No. 2”) to the BeiGene, Ltd. Second Amended and Restated 2016 Share Option and Equity Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of the date this Amendment No. 2 is approved by the shareholders of BeiGene, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company incorporated with limited liability (the “Company”), as specified below.


Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


“(a)   Shares Issuable.   The maximum number of Shares that have been reserved and available for issuance under the Plan shall be 283,323,772 Shares, of which 114,354,590 Shares are reserved and remain available for issuance (representing approximately 8.6% (or less) of the issued share capital of the Company as of June 22, 2022, being the effective date of the approval of Amendment No. 2 to the second amended and restated Plan by the shareholders (the “Amended Effective Date”)). For purposes of this limitation, the Shares underlying any awards granted under this Plan or the Company’s 2011 Option Plan (including any grants made prior to the Amended Effective Date) that are forfeited, canceled, held back upon exercise of an Option or settlement of an award to cover the exercise price or tax withholding, reacquired by the Company prior to vesting, satisfied without the issuance of Shares or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise) shall be added back to the Shares available for issuance under the Plan, provided that (i) the Shares reserved and available for issuance under the Plan and the Company’s 2018 Inducement Equity Plan (as amended and restated) shall not exceed 133,480,526 Shares as of the Amended Effective Date, being 10% of the issued share capital of the Company as of the Amended Effective Date, (ii) if the Company cancels an Option and issues a new Option to the same Grantee, the issue of such new Option shall be made only to the extent that Shares are reserved and available for issuance excluding the cancelled Option and (iii) notwithstanding the foregoing, no Shares underlying any Options granted under this Plan or the Company’s 2011 Option Plan (including any grants made prior to the Amended Effective Date) shall be added back to the Shares available for issuance under the Plan unless such Options have lapsed or otherwise been terminated in accordance with the terms of the Plan or the 2011 Option Plan. In the event the Company repurchases Shares on the open market, such Shares shall not be added to the Shares available for issuance under the Plan. Subject to such overall limitations, Shares may be issued up to such maximum number pursuant to any type or types of Award. The Shares available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized but unissued Shares or Shares reacquired by the Company.”


Except as provided above, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect without modification.


DATE APPROVED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS: April 17, 2022


DATE APPROVED BY SHAREHOLDERS: June 22, 2022
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Geoffrey G. Meyers, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Manor Care, Inc. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
              ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
              Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
              requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
              the Report.

/s/ Geoffrey G. Meyers

Geoffrey G. Meyers
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 4, 2004
Order filed April 13, 2015

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00192-CV

____________

In the Interest of E.L., a Child

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-05682J

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the 

termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue. Appellant’s brief was due 

April 8, 2015, but it has not been filed. 

Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be 

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (effective May 1, 2012). This accelerated schedule 

requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines. 

Therefore we order appellant’s appointed counsel, Stephen M. Pierce, to file 

appellant’s brief no later than April 24, 2015. If the brief is not filed by that date, 

counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of 
court. In addition, the court may require appointment of new counsel due to the 

failure to timely file appellant’s brief. 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32(c)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Carolina Power & Light Company (the “Company”) for the period
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lloyd M. Yates, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Lloyd M.
Yates


Lloyd M.
Yates


President
and Chief Executive Officer


March 2,
2009








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
ATTACHMENT 2 

Forma para Mantenimento de Records de Plaguicidas de Use Restringido 

El nombre y direcci6n de Ia granja o negocio ------------- - - - - -------- - - --- -

Area tratada Informacion del Qlaguicida Informacion del aQiicador 

La fecha mes/dia/aiio Lamarca El nombre 

El cultlvo 

La ubicaci6n El numero de registro de EPA El numero de certificaci6n 

El tamai\o del area La cantidad total aplicada• 

Notas: 

-

•tndique Ia canlidad total de producto utilizada, por ejemplo Iibras, pintas u onzas, y no ·se refiere at porciento de ingrediente activo. 

Area tratada Informacion del Qlaguicida Informacion del aQiicador 

La fecha mes/dia/aiio Lamarca El nombre 

El cultivo 

La ubicaci6n El numero de registro de EPA El numero de certificaci6n 

El tamai\o del area La cantidad total aplicada* 

Notas: 

•tndique Ia cantidad total de producto utitizada, por ejemplo Iibras, pintas u onzas, y nose refiere at porciento de ingrediente activo. 
Area tratada Informacion del ~laguicida Informacion del a~licador 

La fecha mes/dfa/aiio Lamarca El nombre 

El cultivo 

La ubicaci6n El numero de registro de EPA El numero de certificaci6n 

El tamaiio del area La cantldad total aplicada* 

Notas: 

*lndique Ia cantidad total de producto utilizada, por ejemplo Iibras, pintas u onzas, y no se refiere al porciento de ingrediente activo. 

Area tratada Informacion del agu id a Informacion del a~ icador 

La fecha mes/dia/ai\o Lamarca El nombre 

El cultivo 

La ubicaci6n El numero de registro de EPA El numero de certificaci6n 

El tamano del area La cantidad total aplicada* 

Notas: 

•lndique Ia cantidad total de producto ulilizada, por ejemplo Iibras, pintas u onzas, y nose refiere al porciento de ingrediente activo. 

La ley federal requiere que estos records debe ser anotados durante los primeros 14 dias despues de Ia aplicaci6n de dichos 

plaguicidas. Los records deben manternerse por un perfodo de dos alios despues de Ia aplicaci6n de plaguicidas. 

PARA MAS INFORMACI6N, LLAMA USDA-PESTICIDE RECORDS BRANCH 

(703 330-7826) 

http;//www.ams.usda.gov/ science/sdpr.htm
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CIK>       0000715273
<NAME>      Wyndham International, Inc.
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          69,069                  27,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  185,994                  46,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,583                   9,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               325,950                 100,662
<PP&E>                                         662,135                  29,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,032                   1,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,006,821                 252,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          602,494                 115,656
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         36                       0
<COMMON>                                         2,135                     733
<OTHER-SE>                                     132,923                  80,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,006,821                 252,088
<SALES>                                      1,842,682                 167,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,002,227                 204,134
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,294,746                 142,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               752,751                  60,266
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,690                     933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,826                     373
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (14,381)                   (481)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,257)                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (112,419)                    (20)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.84)                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.84)                       0
        

</TABLE>
FAIRCHILD INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



FAIRCHILD INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Suite 600

595 Hornby Street

Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1A4

 

April 30, 2002

WINSTON CABELL

Dear Winston:

Re:Fairchild International Corporation (the "Corporation") - Stock Option Agreement

This letter will serve to confirm that, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it has been agreed to amend the incentive stock option agreement (the "Stock Option Agreement") entered into between yourself and the Corporation dated effective September 7, 2001 respecting the issuance to you of stock options (the "Options") to purchase up to an aggregate of 100,000 common shares in the capital stock of the Corporation at an exercise price of $0.25 per share exercisable until September 7, 2004.

Pursuant to section 6 of the terms and conditions attached to and forming part of the Stock Option Agreement, , the Stock Option Agreement shall be and is hereby amended to provide that the exercise price of the Options will be $0.06 per share.

The Stock Option Agreement, as amended hereby, shall continue in full force and effect.

Yours truly,

FAIRCHILD INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Per: /s/ Robert Grace

Robert Grace,

President

 

I, WINSTON CABELL, hereby consent to and agree with the foregoing, this 1st day of May, 2002.

/s/ Winston Cabell

_________________________________________

WINSTON CABELL
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE III

ENHANCED COOPERATION

ENHANCED COOPERATION

Article 330

(ex Articles 27a to 27e, 40 to 40b and 43 to 45 TEU and ex Articles 11 and 11a TEC)

(ex Articles 27a

e

b

a

All members of the Council may participate in its deliberations, but only members of the Council representing the Member States participating in enhanced cooperation shall take part in the vote.

Unanimity shall be constituted by the votes of the representatives of the participating Member States only.

A qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3).

---
```

[Federal Register: June 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 114)]
[Notices]               
[Page 33789]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15jn10-57]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2010-OS-0078]

 
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Threat Reduction Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Defense Threat Reduction Agency proposes to delete a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of record systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
July 15, 2010, unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Brenda Carter at (703) 767-1771.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Threat Reduction Agency notices 
for systems of records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 
552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the Freedom of Information and Privacy Office, Defense 
Threat Reduction Agency, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 
22060-6201.
    The Defense Threat Reduction Agency proposes to delete one system 
of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion 
is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, 
(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: June 9, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletion:
    HDTRA 002.

System name:
    Employee Relations (August 3, 2005; 70 FR 44578).

Reason:
    The Defense Threat Reduction Agency has determined that HDTRA 002 
is covered under the OPM/GOVT-1, General Personnel Records (June 19, 
2006, 71 FR 35356) and OPM/GOVT-3, Records of Adverse Actions, 
Performance Based Reduction in Grade and Removal Actions, and 
Termination of Probationers (April 27, 2000; 65 FR 24732) therefore 
this notice can be deleted.
[FR Doc. 2010-14249 Filed 6-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE II

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 5

COMMON PROVISIONS

Article 323

The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall ensure that the financial means are made available to allow the Union to fulfil its legal obligations in respect of third parties.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This Certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report of
Finlay Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
August 2, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The undersigned hereby certifies that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




Date: September 10, 2003

                                                  /s/ Arthur E. Reiner
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                  Arthur E. Reiner
                                                  Chairman, President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer












A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Finlay Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Finlay Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Cite as 2015 Ark. 171

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CR-14-1008

IVORY PURIFOY

PETITIONER

V.

HON. WENDELL LEE GRIFFEN,

JUDGE

RESPONDENT

Opinion Delivered April 16, 2015

PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

[PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

NOS. 60CR-96-871, 60CR-96-1346]

PETITION DENIED IN PART AND

MOOT IN PART.

PER CURIAM

This court requested an amended response from the respondent in this matter, the

Honorable Wendell Lee Griffen. Petitioner Ivory Purifoy filed a petition for writ of mandamus

in this court alleging that Judge Griffen had failed to act in a timely manner on a pro se petition

for declaratory judgment that petitioner had filed in the Pulaski County Circuit Court on June

27, 2014, in two criminal cases, 60CR-96-871 and 60CR-96-1346. The declaratory-judgment

petition sought relief concerning the calculation by the Arkansas Department of Correction

(ADC) of petitioner’s parole eligibility for his criminal convictions in the two cases, and the

mandamus petition requested that this court direct the judge to issue a ruling on the petition for

declaratory judgment. Having now received an amended response and a second amended

response, we now hold that the mandamus petition is denied in part and moot in part.

Judge Griffen filed an initial response to the petition for the writ in which he averred that

the matter had been disposed of through a written order entered on December 3, 2014. Because
Cite as 2015 Ark. 171

the order appeared to address only one of the two criminal cases, 60CR-96-1346, this court

requested that Judge Griffen file an amended response addressing whether the December 3,

2014 order was intended to encompass 60CR-96-871. Purifoy v. Griffen, 2015 Ark. 56 (per

curiam).

Judge Griffen filed an amended response and a second amended response. Although the

first amended response averred that there had been an order entered disposing of the

declaratory-judgment petition in 60CR-96-871, a copy of the order that was attached to the

response had not been file-marked. In the second amended response, Judge Griffen indicates

that no order was entered in 60CR-96-871 because that case was determined to have been

assigned to a different judge.

It is the responsibility of the petitioner to name the correct respondent in a mandamus

action. Standridge v. Putman, 2014 Ark. 208 (per curiam). To the extent that petitioner’s

mandamus petition requests any action regarding the declaratory-judgment petition filed in

60CR-96-871, his petition is therefore denied because the case is not assigned to the respondent. 

To the extent that petitioner sought a ruling on the declaratory-judgment petition as to 60CR-96-

1346, the mandamus petition is moot. 

Petition denied in part and moot in part.

Ivory Purifoy, pro se petitioner.

Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Rebecca Kane, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for respondent.

2