alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert J. Hamel, Appellant.

—Mercure, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Fulton County (Mazzone, J.), rendered January 9, 1990, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of rape in the first degree.

On appeal from his conviction of first degree rape, defendant contends that County Court erroneously precluded him from cross-examining the complainant concerning whether she had made prior false claims of rape and that he was unduly prejudiced by the delay in the production of *Rosario*material consisting of the serologist’s handwritten notes. We disagree.

As to defendant’s first claim, we note that in *People v Mandel*(48 NY2d 952, *cert denied, appeal dismissed*446 US 949) the Court of Appeals held that evidence of a victim’s prior complaint of a sex crime does not come within the proscriptive scope of CPL 60.42; therefore, its "admissibility rests within the discretion of the trial court” *(People v Harris,*132 AD2d 940, 941, *lv denied*74 NY2d 810). Inasmuch as defendant sought to impeach the complainant’s credibility through the use of multiple hearsay *(see, People v Hicks,*154 AD2d 713, 714), without an adequate factual basis for believing that the prior complaint was false *(see, People v Lippert,*138 AD2d 770, 771), we see no abuse of County Court’s discretion in denying defendant’s motion to permit cross-examination of the complainant about a prior incident of attempted rape *(see, supra).*

With respect to defendant’s remaining argument, the prosecution admits that the serologist’s notes were not turned over to the defense before the prosecutor’s opening statement as required *(see,*CPL 240.45 [1] [a]; *People v Rosario,*9 NY2d 286, *cert denied*368 US 866). By failing to move for a mistrial or *838otherwise claim prejudice on this ground, however, defendant’s argument is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Kilgore,*168 AD2d 830; *People v Provenzano,*154 AD2d 486, *lv denied*74 NY2d 951). In any event, the *Rosario*violation in the instant case involves only delay in turning over material and does not require reversal in the absence of substantial prejudice *(see, People v Martinez,*71 NY2d 937, 940; *People v Ranghelle,*69 NY2d 56, 63). No such prejudice occurred here. The material was delivered to defense counsel in sufficient time for its use at trial *(see, People v Kilgore, supra).*Accordingly, defendant’s conviction should be affirmed.

Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW173743]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Marlin Oil Co., LLC, for competitive oil and gas lease WYW173743 for land in Weston County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. Weaver, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at 307-775-6176. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 18                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $159 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate lease WYW173743 effective January 1, 2012, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. The BLM has not issued a                           ( print page 2428)                        valid lease to any other interest affecting the lands.                

Debra A. Olsen,

Land Law Examiner.

[FR Doc. 2013-00318 Filed 1-10-13; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

B.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROTOCOLS ANNEXED TO THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROTOCOLS ANNEXED TO THE TREATIES

44.   Declaration on Article 5 of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union

Declaration on Article 5 of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis

The Conference notes that where a Member State has made a notification under Article 5(2) of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union that it does not wish to take part in a proposal or initiative, that notification may be withdrawn at any moment before the adoption of the measure building upon the Schengen acquis.

acquis

acquis

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000015511
<NAME> THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      918
<ALLOWANCES>                                        52
<INVENTORY>                                        230
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,532
<PP&E>                                          21,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,175
<BONDS>                                          1,233
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,437
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,015<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,686<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  66
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    265
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                165
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       165
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>RESTATEMENT REFLECTED HEREIN IS THE RESULT OF RECLASSIFICATIONS TO PRIOR 
PERIODS' FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO CONFORM TO THE CURRENT PERIOD PRESENTATION.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
11/03/201 0 10:1 3 FAX 202493514 2 FA A ^ DMS 21001/00 2

Expres s 

### '•^rPARTyEN T O F •.\NSPORWIO N :-i-~OPERATiON S '•' ! ^'D V - 3 P 1 : 3 0 I I (];i l Drporl'Tion i 302 0 Hack s Cfij-.;

. Hn.i. i Mi:iii(ilii';,T N 3S^2'• i

VT A FEDE X October 29 , 201 0 Hearin g Docket Federa l Aviatio n Adminisiralio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenu e S.W
. Wilbur Wiieh t Building , Suite 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC;-43 0 

# P.blO- 0 53 9 CPlk(^Lm ^

RE : Withdrawa l o

f Reques t fo r Forma l Hearin g - FA A Cas e Mumbcr

- 2009GL700J5 4
Dea r Sir : I n accordanc e wiih 1 4 CF

RSectio n 13.215 , I-cdera

l hxpres s respectfully withdrawal s it s reques t for aforma l hearin g i

n thi s matter . A cop y o f

thi s reques t

i s bein g sent

t o Kat e Barber , Attorney , Grea t Lake s Region , Federal Aviatio n Administration
. Sincerely , FEDERAL E PRPORATIO N Cynthi aChandlcr-Sncl l Sr
. Attome y Kcgulatoi yAffair s (901)434-836 1 FAX : (901 ) 434-828 3 Cynlhia.chandlcr-sncU@Icdcx.co m ccs/sii/Tiu." ; i.rxx

r Cc : Kate Barber , Attorney - Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Co : Th e Honorabl e RichardC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Cc : Davi dLittlcjohn - Corporate Safety , Federa l Expres s11/03/201 0 10:1 3 FA X 202493514 2 FA A+ DM S gl002/00 2

CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y that th e foregoin g Answe r

ha s bee n sent

vi aPriority Overnigh t

o n this , th e [J ^ da

y o f July , 201 0 to : Th e Honorabl e RichardC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S E Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , RoomE l 2-32 0 Washington
. D C 2059 0 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbu r Wright Building , Suite 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Ms
. Kate Barber Attome y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f th e Regiona

l Counse l - Grea

t Lalcc s Regio n 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenu e DcsPlaine.s,n
. 6001 8
Cynthi aChandler-Sncl l Senio r Attorne y - Regulatory Affair s Federal Expres s Corporatio n 362 0 Hack s Cros s Roa d Buildin g B , 3" ^ Floo r Memphis , TN 3812 5 (901 ) 434-83r; i (901 ) 434-828 3 FA X
Planting Stock for Perennial Crops Grown as Annual Crops

The NOSB Crops Committee submits this recommendation to the NOP to clarify Section 205.204, 

the seeds and planting stock practice standard, in the USDA organic standard for clarification to 

growers and certifiers in reference to Section 205.204 of the final rule. 

There are a number of plants crops such as raspberries and strawberries that are perennial crops 

grown from planting stock rather than true seed. In some farming operations, these crops may be 

grown as annuals rather than perennials where new planting stock is used each year to produce 

one harvest season of an organic crop. 

The Crops Committee recommends that in these systems, the planting stock would be 

considered an annual planting stock and comply with the requirements of the rule as it pertains to 

seeds and planting stock in Section 205.204(1) and 205.204(2), rather than those for perennial 

planting stock that is addressed in Section 205.204(4). For annual production, Section 205.204(1) 

and 205.204(2) addressing annual production states that nonorganically produced planting stock, 

whether untreated or treated with a substance on the National List, may be used to produce an 

organic crop when an equivalent organically produced variety is not commercially available. 

Organic seed or planting stock is required for these crops unless an equivalent organically 

produced variety is not commercially available. Growers who do not grow these crops as annual 

planting stock as defined in the rule as "a plant grown from seed that will complete its life cycle or 

produce a harvestable yield within the same crop year or season in which it was planted", would 

be required to comply with the planting stock requirements for perennial crops presented in 

Section 205.204(4).
# C_2016203EN.01000701.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/7

---

Article 5

For purposes of coordinating and complementing research undertaken in Member States, the Commission shall, either by a specific request addressed to a given recipient and conveyed to the government concerned, or by a general published request, call upon Member States, persons or undertakings to communicate to it their programmes relating to the research which it specifies in the request.

After giving those concerned full opportunity to comment, the Commission may deliver a reasoned opinion on each of the programmes communicated to it. The Commission shall deliver such an opinion if the State, person or undertaking which has communicated the programme so requests.

By such opinions the Commission shall discourage unnecessary duplication and shall direct research towards sectors which are insufficiently explored. The Commission may not publish these programmes without the consent of the State, person or undertaking which has communicated them.

The Commission shall publish at regular intervals a list of those sectors of nuclear research which it considers to be insufficiently explored.

The Commission may bring together representatives of public and private research centres as well as any experts engaged in research in the same or related fields for mutual consultation and exchanges of information.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1448 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to waive fees for Purple Heart 

recipients serving on active duty for loans guaranteed under the home 

loan program of Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2019 

Ms. HERRERA BEUTLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to waive fees for 

Purple Heart recipients serving on active duty for loans 

guaranteed under the home loan program of Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF FEES FOR PURPLE HEART RECIPI4 ENTS SERVING ON ACTIVE DUTY FOR LOANS 

5 GUARANTEED UNDER HOME LOAN PROGRAM 

6 OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3729(c)(1) of title 38, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1448 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘or from a surviving spouse’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘, from a surviving spouse’’; and 

3 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 

4 following: ‘‘, or from a member of the Armed Forces 

5 serving on active duty who was awarded the Purple 

6 Heart’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply with respect to a loan guaranteed 

9 under section 3710 of title 38, United States Code, on 

10 or after January 1, 2020. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 364th District Court of Lubbock County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on January 16,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Cecil R. McDonald v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-15-00033-CR Trial Court Number: 2000-434,614

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated January 16, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on April 20, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00319-CV

BEVERLY SCOTT, GWENDOLYN CARPENTER, DERRICK SCOTT,

AND SAMMIE SCOTT, Appellants

V.

DR. ROBIN LYNN ARMSTRONG, CURTIS J. BICKERS,

AND VUJASINOVIC & BECKCOM PLLC, Appellees

Appeal from the 234th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2012-33615).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on April 8, 

2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible 

error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellants, Beverly Scott, Gwendolyn Carpenter, 

Derrick Scott, and Sammie Scott, jointly and severally, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered April 16, 2015.
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Justice 

Massengale.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, John P. D. Cato, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:

|1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended January 30, 2016 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                  

Dated: January 13, 2017

/s/ John P. D. CatoJohn P. D. CatoChairman, President andChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Butler
Manufacturing Company Consolidated Statements of Operation for the year ended
December 31, 1995, and Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1995, and
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000015840
<NAME> BUTLER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           7,253
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     51,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               187,303
<PP&E>                                         206,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                 143,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 282,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          126,132
<BONDS>                                         42,613<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,623
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,395<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   282,869
<SALES>                                        826,538
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               825,173<F3>
<CGS>                                          675,671
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  675,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               103,093<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,309
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,877
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,432
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,432
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.07
<FN>
<F1>Reflects long-term debt, less current maturities
<F2>Reflects other stockholders' equity before deduction of $29.7 million cost of
treasury stock
<F3>Reflects net sales plus net international joint venture income less net other
expense
<F4>Consists of selling, general, and administrative expense
</FN>
        

</TABLE>