alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in the Statement of Additional Information
constituting part of this Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the registration
statement (Form N-4 No. 333-79701) (the "Registration Statement") of our report
dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in such Statement of Additional
Information. We also consent to the use in the Statement of Additional
Information constituting part of this Registration Statement of our report
dated April 6, 2001, relating to the financial statements of Fortis Benefits
Insurance Company Variable Account D, which appears in such Statement of
Additional Information. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Public Accountants" in such Statement of Additional
Information.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 17, 2002
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(b)
                                ---------------

                        OPINION AND CONSENT OF ACTUARY
<PAGE>

               [Transamerica Life Insurance Company Letterhead]

April 10, 2002


Transamerica Life Insurance Company
4333 Edgewood Road NE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52499-0001

Re:   Separate Account VA B
      Registration on Form N-4  SEC File No. 33-33085

Dear Sir/Madam:

With regard to the above registration statement, I have examined such documents
and made such inquiries as I have deemed necessary and appropriate, and on the
basis of such examination, have the following opinions:

Fees and charges deducted under the Transamerica Landmark policy are those
deemed necessary to appropriately reflect:

(1)   the expenses incurred in the acquisition and distribution of the Policies,

(2)   the expenses associated with the development and servicing of the
      policies,

(3)   the assumption of certain risks arising from the operation and management
      of the policies and/or riders to the policy and that provides for a
      reasonable margin of profit.

Fees and charges assessed against the policy values in the variable account
include:

(i)   Service Charge and Administrative Charge

(ii)  Surrender Charge

(iii) Mortality and Expense Risk Fee (M&E)

(iv)  Taxes (including premium and other taxes if applicable)

(v)   Any applicable rider fees or charges

The magnitude of each of the individual charges listed above in (i) through (v)
is established in the pricing of the Transamerica Landmark Variable Annuity, to
achieve a reasonable Return on Investment (ROI), which is within the range of
industry practice with respect to comparable variable annuity products.
<PAGE>

Transamerica Life Insurance Company
April 10, 2002
Page 2

Except by coincidence, it is not expected that actual charges assessed in a
given year would exactly offset actual expenses incurred.  Acquisition expenses
(as well as major product and/or systems development expenses) are incurred "up
front" and recovered, with a reasonable profit margin, through future years'
charges.  In addition, the company cannot increase certain charges under the
Policies in the pricing process.

Therefore, in my opinion, the fees and charges deducted under the Policies, in
the aggregate, are reasonable in relation to the services rendered, the expenses
expected to be incurred, and the risks assumed by the company.

I hereby consent to the use of this opinion, which is included as an Exhibit to
the Registration Statement.



/s/ Calvin R. Birkey
----------------------------------------
Calvin R. Birkey, FSA, MAAA
Managing Actuary
Transamerica Life Insurance Company
#### Robert V. Magee Jr., Also Known as Robb Magee, et al., Respondents, v Larry Hutcher et al., Appellants. (And Another Related Action.)

—Appeal (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from that part of an order of the Supreme Court (Dickinson, J.), entered May 29, 1990 in Putnam County, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for a change of venue.

Although defendants do not oppose consolidation of this matter, they do contend that because they commenced their action first in New York County, Supreme Court erred in fixing the place of trial in Putnam County where the second action was commenced. However, while it is generally true that, in the absence of special circumstances, venue of a consolidated action should be where the first action was instituted *(see, Strasser v Neuringer,*137 AD2d 750; *Boyea v Lambeth,*33 AD2d 928), the final decision rests in the discretion of the court and any circumstances may be considered which negate placing venue where the first action was commenced *(Perinton Assocs. v Heicklen Farms,*67 AD2d 832). Furthermore, venue should normally be in the county where the claim arose *(Jansen v Bernhang,*149 AD2d 468). Here, the claim arose in Putnam County, defendants maintain a residence in that County, an earlier trial could be had there and the convenience of the witnesses would be served by a trial in that County *(see, Colburn v Brown,*23 AD2d 574). These facts establish the special circumstances required for setting venue in Putnam County even though the first action was commenced in New York County *(see, Boyea v Lambeth, supra).*Defendants’ remaining contentions have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Casey, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Cagles, Inc. for the year ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. The Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and

2. The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 4, 2006



By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle

J. Douglas Cagle

Chief Executive Officer























CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Cagles, Inc. for the year ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. The Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and

2. The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 4, 2006



By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV

Mark M. Ham IV

Chief Financial Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1322 

To require a report on the effects of climate change on the Coast Guard, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2019 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York (for himself and Mr. BROWN of 

Maryland) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require a report on the effects of climate change on 

the Coast Guard, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON 

4 COAST GUARD. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commandant of 

7 the Coast Guard shall submit to the Committee on Trans8 portation and Infrastructure of the House of Representa9 tives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

10 Transportation of the Senate a report on vulnerabilities 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1322 IH

1 of Coast Guard installations and requirements resulting 

2 from climate change over the next 20 years. 

3 (b) ELEMENTS.—The report under subsection (a) 

4 shall include the following: 

5 (1) A list of the ten most vulnerable Coast 

6 Guard installations based on the effects of climate 

7 change, including rising sea tides, increased flooding, 

8 drought, desertification, wildfires, thawing perma9 frost, or any other categories the Commandant de10 termines necessary. 

11 (2) An overview of mitigations that may be nec12 essary to ensure the continued operational viability 

13 and to increase the resiliency of such vulnerable in14 stallations and the cost of such mitigations. 

15 (3) A discussion of the climate-change-related 

16 effects on the Coast Guard, including the increase in 

17 the frequency of humanitarian assistance and dis18 aster relief missions and the campaign plans, contin19 gency plans, and operational posture of the Coast 

20 Guard. 

21 (4) An overview of mitigations that may be nec22 essary to ensure mission resiliency and the cost of 

23 such mitigations. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1322 IH

1 (c) FORM.—The report required under subsection (a) 

2 shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain 

3 a classified annex. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
United States Department of Agriculture 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

Cotton and Tobacco Program

October 9, 2014 

National Database 

Credit Card Information

National Database User ID: _______________ 

National Database Customer Name: ____________________________________ 

Taxpayer ID: (U.S. customers only) ____________________________________ 

Credit Card Type (check one): __ MasterCard 

 __ Visa 

 __ American Express 

 __ Discover 

Credit Card Number: ____________________________________ 

Security Code (3 digit number on back of card): ___________ 

 

Expiration Date: ____________________________________ 

Name as it appears on Credit Card: ____________________________________ 

Please check the box below if you agree to the terms listed. 

 I authorize the Cotton Program to charge my account for all usage of the National 

Database accessed using my User ID. I understand monthly bills are generated at 

the beginning of each month and that my account will not be charged until after 

the 15th of that month. 

Authorized Representative: 

Printed name: _______________________________ 

Signature: _______________________________ 

Official Title: _______________________________ 

Date: _______________________________ 

Please fax completed form to (901) 384-3035.
Exhibit 10.21.3

AMENDED  EXHIBIT "A"    To The    GAS PURCHASE CONTRACT    As Of: October 1, 1994    Between    CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION ("BUYER")    and
   IGI RESOURCES, INC. ("SELLER")

Effective
Date of this Exhibit "A":  October 1, 2003

Ending
Date of this Exhibit "A":  March 31, 2004

DELIVERY POINT

As defined in Section 1.01(g) of the Contract noted aboveMAXIMUM DAILY CONTRACT QUANTITY(MMBtu)

7,446DELIVERY POINT SELLING PRICE

1/


---



| |  | "BUYER"
CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
| |  | ---------------------------------------
| |  |                                        
| |  | By:                                    
| |  | Name:                                  
| |  | Title:                                 
| |  |                                        
| |  |                                        
| |  | "SELLER"
IGI RESOURCES, INC.           
| |  |                                        
| |  | By:                                    
| |  | Name:                                  
| |  | Title:                                 

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below, being a member of the Board of Directors of Adaptive Broadband
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitutes and appoints Donna S. Birks and
Kenneth J. Wees, and each of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
agent, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign on his behalf the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended June 30, 1999,
and to execute any amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, with the full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing necessary or advisable to be done in connection
therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and
agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

DATED:      August 18, 1999


       /s/ Frederick D. Lawrence                /s/ William B. Marx, Jr.
---------------------------------        ------------------------------------
Frederick D. Lawrence                    William B. Marx, Jr.



       /s/ Leslie G. Denend                     /s/ Terry W. Ward
---------------------------------        ------------------------------------
Leslie G. Denend                         Terry W. Ward



       /s/ George A. Joulwan                    /s/ Frederick W. Whitridge, Jr.
---------------------------------        ------------------------------------
George A. Joulwan                        Frederick W. Whitridge, Jr.
regarding the lack of findings in the district court's June 4, 2014, order, we 

note that the only sanction imposed on appellant was the dismissal of his 

complaint. In this regard, we also note that appellant's complaint had 

already been dismissed as to all named defendants except Las Vegas 

Metropolitan Police Department Forensic Lab and Clark County 

Metropolitan Police Committee on Fiscal Affairs. Because the claims 

against these defendants were premised on the same nonactionable 

allegations that had been previously dismissed with respect to the other 

defendants, appellant's argument does not warrant reversal. We therefore 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

7 

, J. 

Pickering 

2 0n February 24, 2015, appellant filed two requests for judicial 

notice. Because the first request asks that this court take judicial notice of 

documents that are already part of the record on appeal, no further action 

needs to be taken with respect to this request. Because the second request 

asks that this court take judicial notice of documents that were not 

presented to the district court, that request is denied. See Carson Ready 

Mix, Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank of Nev., 97 Nev. 474, 476-77, 635 P.2d 276, 

277 (1981) (noting that this court may only consider matters appearing in 

the record on appeal). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e 
cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge 

Anthony Dewane Bailey 

North Las Vegas City Attorney 

Clark County District Attorney 

Olson, Cannon, Gormley, Angulo & Stoberski 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A
### Reg u la to ry Eva lu a ti on

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD



### Add the work hour s, parts cost, and number qf

### US. registered products to the t able below

. When you are finished click on the ·'Update Fields,. button to automaticalzvjill in the totals. Update Fields 

# j

E sti m ate d C o sts : Action Costs per Pro d u c t ( e . g., aircraft, eng ine, (e

. g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work

- hours Labor Par1s Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) ( i nclude c o st ( labor+ 

# u .s . for U.S. Fleet Do not includ e oncond ition costs her e access , testing , (@$85/h parts) R e g i stere d and close

- up) our) Pro d ucts Inspection (0.5 hours 

### \**~2** \{'_f) .lJ**~** 

### I 0 per window, 76 

### 38 0 

### '1><2Hl.O< 1 528 l II w indows)



## .. OJ)'J**~** 0.00 \ 

### O

. tiO 

### 0 0 l ,') 

### :1

. on 

### ' 0 IlL ' (}, {) I (I I (I 

### 0 !){, Of) (I 00 ) 

### 0.00

.... 18 I) Ill) 

### ..; <LOO**o.:.~** {l ()(! 

# " 0 00 l)oJ 0.00 ) 

### 0.00 :1- II) l.l,O ') (j 

### .00 

## o.:)**~·** CJ 

### .:.. 0 00 0 (l ( .0(!**~** 

### 0.00**.~** 

### OJ)**~** 

## c l ") (j 

### .00 

### O.J • [l**~** 

## n oo


# , () ,) ., .!'(1**~** 

### 0 00**~"** 

### ) 0 

## •,.u 1**~** 

## u.oo 00 ( I, ' (, lllJ 

## s O.tl 'h**~·** .O(J 

## ' 0 {)()

.... {) (l 

### S I,(.), ' 

## oon 

# s J.O '() fl (' ' (' u{J 

# s Q.u .;, l1 Ot' 

### 0 00
The known n umber of p rod u cts in comp l iance: Number Total Cos t s of comQi iance for U.S. fleet: $4,935,440 Costs covered under war r a n ty 

### (if known) $ Wa rranty

On- C o nditio n

# Cos**·~** Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Produc t Action (include access, (@$85/hour) (e

. g. , Inspection, test ing , and close-

replacement) up ) Inspection 

### .., <1.0.! 

# " O.Ou "> (} tl ) 1) 

## n Oil 

# "' ( 0:1 

# s 1l.Ofl'. 0 00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to e;r:plain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious

. This field can also be used to e.tplain warrant y cost s) : 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a " significant regulatory

# ac**ion"? ~**  YES* 

## 0**NO~** 

### *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:
Is the AD significant?

# '·**~** YES* 

## 0**NO~** 

### *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer.

# · YES 0**NO ~**  

### Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

# ~ YES* 0 NO 

### 181 *Explanation:
P&SP-1300i Page 1 of 1 

Instructions to Complete 

Change of Name of Posted Stockyard 

Form P&SP–1300

As a market agency selling livestock on a commission basis, use form P&SP-1300 when the name of your stockyard 

changes to update the official records about your stockyard as a posted stockyard. 

Mail the completed form to the regional office of the Packers and Stockyards Program that covers your state. The states 

covered by each regional office are listed below the regional office’s address. 

Regional Offices of the Packers and Stockyards Program 

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration

Eastern Regional Office 

Suite 230 

75 Spring Street 

Atlanta, GA 30303-3308 

Telephone: (404) 562-5840 

FAX: (404) 562-5848 

e-mail: 

PSPAtlantaGA.GIPSA@usda.gov

Western Regional Office 

3950 Lewiston St., Suite 200 

Aurora, CO 80011-1556 

Telephone: (303) 375-4240 

FAX: (303) 371-4609 

e-mail: 

PSPDenverCO.GIPSA@usda.gov

Midwestern Regional Office 

Room 317 

210 Walnut Street 

Des Moines, IA 50309-2110 

Telephone: (515) 323-2579 

FAX: (515) 323-2590 

e-mail: 

PSPDesMoinesIA.GIPSA@usda.gov

States Covered States Covered States Covered

AL, AR, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, LA, 

MA, MD, ME, MS, NC, NH, NJ, 

NY, PA, RI, SC, TN, VA, VT, WV

AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, KS, MT, 

NM, NV, OK, OR, TX, UT, WA, 

WY

IA, IL, IN, KY, OH, MI, MO, MN, 

ND, NE, SD, WI

Additional copies of this form may be obtained from the regional office covering your state. All inquiries concerning any 

section or part of a section contained in the form can also be addressed by that regional office. 

Line No. Subject Instruction 

1 Former Name of 

Stockyard 

Enter the previous name of the stockyard as posted. 

2 Location of 

Stockyard 

Enter the number, street, city, state, and 9-digit zip code of the 

physical location of the stockyard. 

3 Facility Number Enter the posted stockyard number. 

4 New Name of 

Stockyard 

Enter the new name of the stockyard. 

5 Stockyard Owned 

By 

Enter the name(s) of owners and/or officers including individuals and 

partners. 

6 Change Date Enter the date of the change of ownership. 

7 Signed An owner or officer of the stockyard must sign the form. 

8 Title Enter the title of the owner or officer who signed the form. 

9 Date Enter the date the form was signed. 

Expires 11-30-2017
(June 27, 1991)

#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jack Sherman, Appellant. Thomas F. Hartnett, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 18, 1989, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he had insufficient earnings or weeks of employment in his base period.

Although it was established that claimant did work for the employer, no payroll records were kept and claimant was paid in cash. Furthermore, claimant failed to produce any documentation showing how long he worked for the employer or the amount of remuneration he received. While he contended that he had kept a record of his weekly earnings, he did not produce these records at the first hearing; nor did he produce them at the second hearing although specifically asked to do so. Whether a claimant has sufficient weeks of employment to entitle him to receive unemployment insurance benefits is a question of fact for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve and, under the circumstances of this case, the Board’s rejection of claimant’s testimony and its conclusion that claimant had failed to establish that he had the required weeks of employment is supported by substantial evidence and *945must be upheld *(see, Matter of Biondo [Levine],*52 AD2d 656; *Matter of Mitagstein [Catherwood]*32 AD2d 584).

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.