Name: John M. McManus

Title: Vice President- Environmental Service

Company: American Electric Power

Sign Date: 6/30/2010

Name: Scott W. Banach

Title: Director, Project Engineering

Company: Platt Environmental Services, Inc.

Sign Date: 6/25/2010

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 1 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Facility Information:

General James M. Gavin Unit 2- 8102

7397 N. St. Rte. 7

Cheshire OH 45620

Contact: Paul Jackson

Phone: 614-716-3278

Fax: 614-716-1252

Email: pmjackson@aep.com

Testing Company:

Platt Environmental Services, Inc.

1520 Kensington Road

Suite 204

Oak Brook IL 60523

Contact: Scott Banach

Phone: 630-521-9400

Fax: 630-521-9494

Email: sbanach@plattenv.com

Air Permit Number:

06-27-01-0056

Permitted Source ID/Name:

0627010056 General James M. Gavin Unit 2

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:

11936 mmBTU/hr

Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:

11936 mmBTU/hr

Target Process Test Rate

11936 mmBTU/hr

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

Babcock and Wilcox model UP-102 pulverized coal-fired, dry-bottom boiler having a nominal capacity of 11,936 

mmBTU/hr, and controlled with a SCR, ESP, and wet FGD.

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

Industry/SCC/NAIS

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information:

AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description 10100202 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous 

Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Bituminous Coal) 

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

Stack 504 0 0 0 252 1008 4 6

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Duration

Sample 

Location Points Comments

Stack Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 90 0

Stack Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 90 0

Stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 90 0

Stack O2 Method 3A O2 3 90 0

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 2 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 3 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack - Method 26A

Average

Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Test Date 3/11/2010 3/11/2010 3/11/2010

Run Start Time 8:27:00 AM 10:27:00 

AM

12:16:00 PM

Run Finish Time 9:56:00 AM 11:46:00 

AM

1:35:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 53.992 52.928 50.268 52.396

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 15.15 15.77 15.04 15.320

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 12.97 13.49 13.43 13.297

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.1 11.9 12 12.000

Oxygen, % 7 6.9 7 6.967

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 122.75 124.17 124.00 123.640

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 4,000,266.7 3,861,003.8 3,887,833.3 3,916,367.93

3

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 5,303,472.0 5,162,156.9 5,192,913.7 5,219,514.20

0

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 103.5 105.1 99.1 102.567

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9931 9780 9780 9,830.333

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 4 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 5 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Emissions Summary

Process Run Data

Location: Stack - Method 26A

Compound: Hydrogen Chloride

Average

RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Mass_mg 18 18 18 18.000

lb/mmBtuO2 1.10E-02 1.09E-02 1.16E-02 0.011

Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride

Average

RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Mass_mg 120 120 120 120.000

lb/mmBtuO2 7.32E-02 7.30E-02 7.74E-02 0.075

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 6 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Process Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 Bituminous Coal Burned 1134 1000 Tons/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1150

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 7 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

1 Main Steam Pressure 1102 psig The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1100

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 8 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

1 Main Steam Temperature 1008 F The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 9 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

1 Sorbent Injection Rate 0.95 tons/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 10 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

1 NH3 Flow 742.01 gal/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

740

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 11 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

1 Total Excess Air 19.44 % The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

20

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 12 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

1 Gross Load 1414.6 MW The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1300

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 13 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 Bituminous Coal Burned 1128 1000 Tons/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1150

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 14 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 Main Steam Pressure 1100 psig The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1100

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 15 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 Main Steam Temperature 1009 F The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 16 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 Sorbent Injection Rate 1.23 tons/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 17 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 NH3 Flow 742 gal/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

740

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 18 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 Total Excess Air 19.4 % The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

20

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 19 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 Gross Load 1409 MW The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1300

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 20 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

3 Bituminous Coal Burned 1131 1000 Tons/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1150

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 21 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

3 Main Steam Pressure 1100 psig The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1100

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 22 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

3 Main Steam Temperature 1009 F The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 23 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

3 Sorbent Injection Rate 1.31 tons/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 24 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

3 NH3 Flow 742 gal/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

740

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 25 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

3 Total Excess Air 19.42 % The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

20

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 26 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data

3 Gross Load 1411 MW The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1300

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 CATALYTIC REDUCTION 45.1 Nox ppm 50

2 CATALYTIC REDUCTION 44.9 Nox ppm 50

3 CATALYTIC REDUCTION 45.1 Nox ppm 50

1 WET SCRUBBER - HIGH EFFICIENCY 79.61 So2 ppm 85

2 WET SCRUBBER - HIGH EFFICIENCY 78.07 So2 ppm 85

3 WET SCRUBBER - HIGH EFFICIENCY 87.2 So2 ppm 85

1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH 

EFFICIENCY

6.91 opacity % 20

2 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH 

EFFICIENCY

8.3 opacity % 20

3 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH 

EFFICIENCY

8.23 opacity % 20

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 27 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 28 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack - Method 26A

Average

Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Test Date 3/11/2010 3/11/2010 3/11/2010

Run Start Time 8:27:00 AM 10:27:00 AM 12:16:00 PM

Run Finish Time 9:56:00 AM 11:46:00 AM 1:35:00 PM

Net Traversing Points 16 16 16

Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.235 0.235 0.235 0.235

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1 1 1 1.000

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.66 28.66 28.66 28.660

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 2.25 2.14 2.18 2.190

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 54.968 54.685 52.565 54.073

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 57.88 65.42 71.83 65.043

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 53.992 52.928 50.268 52.396

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 204.8 210.6 189 201.467

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 9.64 9.91 8.90 9.483

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 15.15 15.77 15.04 15.320

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 12.97 13.49 13.43 13.297

Dry Mole Fraction 0.8703 0.8651 0.8657 0.867

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.1 11.9 12 12.000

Oxygen, % 7 6.9 7 6.967

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.9 81.2 81 81.033

Fuel Factor 1.15 1.18 1.16

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.22 30.18 30.20 30.200

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.03 28.95 28.85 28.943

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.500

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.62 28.62 28.62 28.620

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 122.75 124.17 124.00 123.640

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.1254567809

426

1.060519149

70358

1.069826945

15065

1.085

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 63.80 62.10 62.47 62.790

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 1,385.442 1,385.442 1,385.442 1,385.442

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 4,000,266.7 3,861,003.8 3,887,833.3 3,916,367.9

33

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 5,303,472.0 5,162,156.9 5,192,913.7 5,219,514.2

00

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 103.5 105.1 99.1 102.567

Percent Excess Air, % 48.8 47.5 48.7 48.333

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9931 9780 9780 9,830.333

Round Duct Diameter, inches 504 504 504

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 29 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 30 of 30
Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 31 of 30