alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1422 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit the acceptance by political committees of online contributions from certain 

unverified sources, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2019 

Mr. GOSAR (for himself, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Ms. 

BROWNLEY of California, Mr. COOPER, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. NEWHOUSE, and 

Mrs. KIRKPATRICK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit the acceptance by political committees of online 

contributions from certain unverified sources, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Foreign Dona5 tions Affecting Our Elections Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1422 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRING DISCLOSURE OF CREDIT VERIFICATION 

2 VALUE AS CONDITION OF ACCEPTANCE OF 

3 ONLINE CONTRIBUTIONS TO FEDERAL ELEC4 TION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 302 of the Federal Elec6 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30102) is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(j)(1) No political committee shall accept any Inter9 net credit card contribution unless— 

10 ‘‘(A) the individual or entity making such con11 tribution is required, at the time such individual 

12 makes such contribution, to disclose the credit 

13 verification value of such credit card; and 

14 ‘‘(B)(i) the billing address associated with such 

15 credit card is located in the United States; or 

16 ‘‘(ii) in the case of a contribution made by an 

17 individual who is a United States citizen living out18 side of the United States, the individual provides the 

19 committee with the United States mailing address 

20 the individual uses for voter registration purposes. 

21 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding subsection (b) or (c), in the 

22 case of an Internet credit card contribution— 

23 ‘‘(A) no later than 10 days after receiving the 

24 contribution, the person who receives the contribu25 tion shall forward to the treasurer such contribution, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1422 IH

1 the name and address of the person making the con2 tribution, and the date of receipt; and 

3 ‘‘(B) the treasurer of a political committee shall 

4 keep an account of the name and address of any 

5 person making any such contribution, together with 

6 the date and amount of such contribution by any 

7 person. 

8 ‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘Internet credit card 

9 contribution’ means a contribution that— 

10 ‘‘(A) is made using a credit card; and 

11 ‘‘(B) is received through an Internet website.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contributions 

14 made after the expiration of the 180-day period which be15 gins on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13A-14**

**PROMULGATED UNDER**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Laurie Romanak, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and 

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986, Section III E.] 

(c)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 14, 2007 

 

37
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE V

CITIZENS' RIGHTS

CITIZENS' RIGHTS

Article 39

Right to vote and to stand as a candidate at elections to the European Parliament

1.   Every citizen of the Union has the right to vote and to stand as a candidate at elections to the European Parliament in the Member State in which he or she resides, under the same conditions as nationals of that State.

2.   Members of the European Parliament shall be elected by direct universal suffrage in a free and secret ballot.

---
S° 7 \l_ C^trr^ U*/r

74*5 /jUy 7SJeJ&

H-«*A\,?//t, 7% -77S&

REC^fsJLcMS

JMrK ADD A*\ffl& IP fcW

M^AC0B».Cte*

v

'

'

:- • • .

.

...'..

: • • - • • .

.

'•w/-...;/;•)••••%'
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





**Exhibit
      32.2**





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63
      of
      Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Finlay
      Enterprises, Inc., (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2,
      2008
      (the “Report”) that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and


2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.


Date:
                  September 11, 2008/s/
                  Bruce E. ZurlnickBruce
                  E. ZurlnickSenior
                  Vice President, Treasurer
                and
                  Chief Financial Officer




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
      States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
      disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S)1350

       (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report of Dynegy Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bruce A. Williamson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: May 14, 2003

                                           /s/ Bruce A. Williamson
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Bruce A. Williamson
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Appellate case name: Blake Alan Cotton v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00444-CR

Trial court case number: 1421756

Trial court: 248th District Court of Harris County

A supplemental clerk’s record has been filed. The record shows Cotton is indigent and 

that Emily Munoz-Detoto was appointed to represent him on appeal. We reinstate this appeal on 

our active docket, and appellant’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order. Due to the 

age of this appeal, no extensions of this deadline will be considered.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 16, 2015
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20612

__________________

WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

Cross-Appellant,

versus

HEEDINGTON INSURANCE LIMITED; TEXACO, INC.;

TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING, INCORPORATED,

Defendants-Appellees

Cross-Appellants.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(1-93-CV-515)

______________________________________________

April 9, 1996

Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After consideration of the briefs and argument of counsel and

relevant portions of the record, we find ourselves essentially in

agreement with the reasoning of the district court on the basis of

which it denied plaintiff recovery. We do not consider plaintiffappellant’s argument respecting the $10,000,000-$11,000,000
2

coverage overlap inasmuch as that issue was not raised in the

district court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.9(b)



                Each of the parties identified in the table below is party to an
employment agreement with Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. in the form attached as
Exhibit 10.9(a). Each party's employment agreement is identical except for such
party's Base Salary, position, agreement date and Prior Agreements, each of
which is set forth in the table below.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EMPLOYEE NAME                       BASE SALARY   POSITION                         AGREEMENT DATE     PRIOR AGREEMENTS
<S>                                 <C>           <C>                              <C>                <C>
Aimee S. Weisner.................   $215,000      Corporate Vice President,        January 18, 2002   Retention Agreement among the
                                                  General Counsel and Secretary                       Company, Allergan and the
                                                                                                      Executive dated January 18,
                                                                                                      2002

Jane E. Rady.....................   $250,000      Corporate Vice President,        April 8, 2002      Agreement between Allergan and
                                                  Strategy and Technology                             Executive dated April 8, 2002
</TABLE>
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE III

AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES

AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES

Article 40

(ex Article 34 TEC)

(ex Article 34 TEC)

1.   In order to attain the objectives set out in Article 39, a common organisation of agricultural markets shall be established.

This organisation shall take one of the following forms, depending on the product concerned:

| (a) | common rules on competition; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

common rules on competition;

| (b) | compulsory coordination of the various national market organisations; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

compulsory coordination of the various national market organisations;

| (c) | a European market organisation. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

a European market organisation.

2.   The common organisation established in accordance with paragraph 1 may include all measures required to attain the objectives set out in Article 39, in particular regulation of prices, aids for the production and marketing of the various products, storage and carryover arrangements and common machinery for stabilising imports or exports.

The common organisation shall be limited to pursuit of the objectives set out in Article 39 and shall exclude any discrimination between producers or consumers within the Union.

Any common price policy shall be based on common criteria and uniform methods of calculation.

3.   In order to enable the common organisation referred to in paragraph 1 to attain its objectives, one or more agricultural guidance and guarantee funds may be set up.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 5

SECTION 5

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 262

(ex Article 229a TEC)

(ex Article 229a

Without prejudice to the other provisions of the Treaties, the Council, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament, may adopt provisions to confer jurisdiction, to the extent that it shall determine, on the Court of Justice of the European Union in disputes relating to the application of acts adopted on the basis of the Treaties which create European intellectual property rights. These provisions shall enter into force after their approval by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

---
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the amended Annual Report of Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-KSB/A-2 for the period ending April 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, R. Don Morris, President and James A. Morris, Secretary of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:7/23/2008By:/s/R. Don MorrisR. Don MorrisPresident and DirectorDate:7/23/2008By:/s/James A. MorrisJames A. MorrisSecretary and Director
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-74,642-03

IN RE MIKE MENDOZA JR., Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 952290 IN THE 262ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 262nd District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
-2-

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Harris County. Should the response

include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was served with

the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to file

a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate

response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: April 8, 2015

Do not publish
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Friday, April 17, 2015

No. 04-15-00045-CR

Freddie Lee SCOTT,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR6965

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On April 6, 2015, we ordered Appellant to provide written proof to this court that the 

reporter’s record has been requested and Appellant was entitled to appeal without paying the 

reporter’s fees. On April 9, 2015, Appellant filed a response satisfying our April 6, 2015 order.

We ORDER court reporter Mary Beth Simpkins to prepare, certify, and file the reporter’s 

record in this court within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P.

35.3(b),(c). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 4.3

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                            LACLEDE CAPITAL TRUST I

         This Certificate of Trust is being executed as of April 4, 2002
and filed in accordance with the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del C.
Section 3801 et seq) and sets forth the following:

         The undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

         1.       Name: The name of the business trust being formed hereby
                  ----
is "Laclede Capital Trust I" (the "Trust").

         2.       Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the
                  ----------------
trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware are as follows:

                           The Bank of New York (Delaware)
                           502 White Clay Center
                           Route 273
                           P. O. Box 6973
                           Newark, Delaware  19711

         3.       Effective. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
                  ---------
immediately upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware.

         4.       Counterparts. This Certificate of Trust may be executed in
                  ------------
one or more counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the trustees of the
Trust, have duly executed this Certificate of Trust as of the day and year
first above written.

ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE              The Bank of New York (Delaware), as
                                    Delaware Trustee
By: /s/ Douglas H. Yaeger
    ----------------------------
Name: Douglas H. Yaeger             By: /s/ Michael Santino
                                        --------------------------------------
                                    Name: Michael Santino
                                    Title: Senior Vice President
ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE

By: /s/ Gerald T. McNeive, Jr.
    ----------------------------    The Bank of New York, as Property Trustee
Name: Gerald T. McNeive, Jr.

                                    By: /s/ Robert A. Massimillo
                                        --------------------------------------
ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE              Name: Robert A. Massimillo
                                    Title: Vice President
By: /s/ Ronald L. Krutzman
    ----------------------------
Name: Ronald L. Krutzman
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONNA KAY LEE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

DEBRA JACQUEZ,

Respondent-Appellee.

No.12-56258

D.C. No.

2:01-cv-10751-

PA-PLA

ORDER

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed September 6, 2016

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Harry Pregerson, and 

Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to the decision of the United States Supreme 

Court in Johnson v. Lee, ___ U.S.___, 136 S. Ct. 1802 

(2016), the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.