Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-570-891]
 AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         January 9, 2013.
 SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is currently conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on hand trucks and certain parts thereof (hand trucks) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) covering the period of review (POR) of December 1, 2010, through November 30, 2011. We preliminarily determine that sales made by New-Tec Integration (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. (New-Tec) were below normal value (NV). In addition, we are not rescinding this review with respect to WelCom Products, Inc. (WelCom), Yangjiang Shunhe Industrial Co., Ltd. and Yangjiang Shunhe Industrial & Trade Co., Ltd. (collectively, Shunhe), and Yuhuan Tongsheng Industry Company (Tongsheng) at this time (
                        *see*
                         “Intent Not to Rescind in Part,” 
                        *infra*). We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Hoefke, or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4947 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order consists of hand trucks manufactured from any material, whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete, suitable for any use, and certain parts thereof, namely the vertical frame, the handling area and the projecting edges or toe plate, and any combination thereof. They are typically imported under heading 8716.80.50.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), although they may also be imported under heading 8716.80.50.90. and 8716.90.50.60. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only, the written product description, available in 
                    *Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China,*69 FR 70122 (December 2, 2004), remains dispositive. Intent Not To Rescind Review in Part For those companies named in the 
                    *Initiation Notice*
                     [1]
                    
                     for which all review requests have been withdrawn, but which have not previously received separate rate status, the Department's practice is to refrain from rescinding the review with respect to these companies at this time. Both Tongsheng and WelCom timely withdrew their requests for review. While the requests for review were timely withdrawn, the companies remain part of the PRC-wide entity. Additionally, we preliminarily find that Shunhe has no reviewable entries at this time. Although the PRC-
                    ( print page 1836)
                    wide entity is not under review for these preliminary results, the possibility exists that the PRC-wide entity could be under review for the final results of this administrative review. Therefore, we are not rescinding this review with respect to Tongsheng, WelCom, and Shunhe at this time. We intend to rescind this review with respect to Tongsheng and Welcom companies in the final results if the PRC-wide entity is not reviewed and with respect to Shunhe if it is unable to demonstrate that it has reviewable entries. Methodology The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export Price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a non-market economy within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, normal value has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. Specifically, the respondent's factors of production have been valued using Thailand prices (when available); Thailand is economically comparable to the PRC and a significant producer of comparable merchandise. For a full description of these surrogate values and the methodology underlying our conclusions, please see memorandum entitled “Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Surrogate-Value Memorandum” dated concurrently with this notice, and the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, the latter of which is adopted hereby. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
                    *via*
                     Import Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at 
                    *http://iaaccess.trade.gov*
                     and in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at 
                    *http://www.trade.gov.ia.*
                     The signed and electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of the Review The Department has determined that the following preliminary dumping margins exist for the period December 1, 2010, through November 30, 2011: Manufacturer/exporter
Weighted-
                             average margin (percent)New-Tec Integration (Xiamen) Co., Ltd.
9.84
 Disclosure and Public Comment The Department will disclose to parties to this proceeding the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of these preliminary results. 
                    *See*19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit written comments no later than 30 days of publication of the preliminary results. Rebuttals to written comments may be filed no later than five days after the written comments are filed.[2] Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice. Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the case briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the date and time for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230.[3] The Department will issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised in any such comments, within 120 days after the publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Deadline for Submission of Publicly Available Surrogate Value Information In accordance with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(ii), the deadline for submission of publicly available information to value FOPs under 19 CFR 351.408(c) is 20 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(1), if an interested party submits factual information less than ten days before, on, or after (if the Department has extended the deadline), the applicable deadline for submission of such factual information, an interested party may submit factual information to rebut, clarify, or correct the factual information no later than ten days after such factual information is served on the interested party. However, the Department generally will not accept in the rebuttal submission additional or alternative surrogate value information not previously on the record, if the deadline for submission of surrogate value information has passed.[4]
                    
                     Furthermore, the Department generally will not accept business proprietary information in either the surrogate value submissions or the rebuttals thereto, as the regulation regarding the submission of surrogate values allows only for the submission of publicly available information.[5] Assessment Rates Upon issuing the final results of the review, the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of review. For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-average dumping margin is above 
                    *de minimis,*
                     we will calculate importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).[6] We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above 
                    *de minimis.*
                     Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. The Department recently announced a refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the 
                    ( print page 1837)
                    subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (
                    *i.e.,*
                     at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.[7] The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements, when imposed, will apply to all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for New-Tec, which has a separate rate, will be that established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for any previously reviewed or investigated PRC and non-PRC exporter not listed above that received a separate rate in a previous segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity (
                    *i.e.,*
                     383.60 percent); and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied the non-PRC exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This administrative review and notice are in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: January 2, 2013. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
 Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Background 2. Scope of the Order 3. Intent Not To Rescind Review in Part 4. Non-Market-Economy Country Status 5. Separate Rates Determination 6. Absence of de Jure Control 7. Absence of de Facto Control 8. Surrogate Country 9. Fair Value Comparisons 10. U.S. Price 11. Normal Value 12. Factors Valuation 13. Currency Conversion


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Initiation of Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part,*77 FR 4759 (January 24, 2012) (
                        *Initiation Notice*). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d). Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.310(c). Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *See, e.g.,**Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Rescission, In Part,*72 FR 58809 (October 17, 2007), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2. Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.301(c)(3). Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         In these preliminary results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 
                        *Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification,*77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         For a full discussion of this practice, 
                        *see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,*76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2013-00269 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P