alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DOT- OST- 

# 1'117-27$5 Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: Kevin, Brad Rawson <brad.rawson@skywest.com> Friday, January 24, 2014 6:23 PM Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) RE:Request for clarification on EASproposals for DV~er,d

# ~f':'!? 2q 

# P 3:5b

SkyWest's proposal for Jamestown and Devils lake isto provide 11 one-stop round trips at the same subsidy rate as originally proposed. Ifyou need any additional details, please let me know. Brad
From: Kevin.Schlemmer@dot.gov [mailto:Kevin.5chlemmer@dot.gov] 

### sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 3:45 PM
. To: chowell@f1ygreatlakes.com; dvoss@f1ygreatlakes.com; mmatthews@f1ygreatlakes.com; Brad Rawson; Mike Thompson 

### Cc: jmsairport@daktel.com; manager@devilslakeairport.com; Kevin.Adams@dot.gov; Dennis.DeVany@dot.gov 

### Subject: Request for clarification on EASproposals for DVLand JMS Regarding the proposals for Essential Air Service (EAS)at Devils lake and Jamestown, North Dakota, from carriers holding authority to operate scheduled service, SkyWest Airlines' proposal for service to both communities does not meet EASminimums in terms of frequency requirements, specifically 2daily round trips 6days aweek with not more than one intermediate stop on each flight per 49 USC41732{b)(1)(a). Additionally, Great lakes Airlines' 

## current service does not meet the aforementioned EASminimums in terms of frequency requirements. Given that neither SkyWest's proposal nor Great lakes' current service meet EASminimum frequency requirements, we request clarification from both carriers on their proposed service levels at the stated subsidy levels by COBtomorrow (Thursday, January 23, 2014). Regards, Kevin Schlemmer Chief, EssentialAir Service 

### & Domestic Analysis Division United States Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC20590 (202) 366-3176 phone (202) 366-7638 fax

1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT CHARLES MONTALVO, Petitioner

v. DAVID MARCIAL, ESQUIRE AND THE MARCIAL LAW FIRM, Respondents : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 584 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 10th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
FoUTUE STfcTE oFTOKS '

RECEIVED IN

AMLToU MERKU WILIXKNVS,_ \ COURTOFCRIfWINAL APPEALS

) APR 13 2015

I Case W.. AWAewUGWc

) DoAllS Uuj\h Q\s\ricA Courl

balWs UunV>j (VisVricA Cbvxr\ i Wo.S; C&Se V\b. p~<\S73M0^L',

Mo. SuhU ) {.&U-Ve. o£ Yetos •*, NWl\oo vJerinV

ReSOor\Acu\TC&V )

PETITION foil ftis aeri&^UN fttm^'

totfcES vic^Xhl^ PcViVi6ntr,''lM\W ^ N^WWtws) 1&td st) v -ftUs -Vke

P> d.3 ^ -VW Courts KarcK IS, ao\S Vernal +o r€v\e>w -VW

aboMC &-UU cause's cVeficaV aror r\v\ \\\t ^vxcUmLrd -VV\oc\r \vscor

rect IN reaA-4-eA VKal AW Aale science vms 'imposed was on

MG-UME^T Mfl NTH gdtHI

rjh AW cuuW^ flVea ^rcmSar'ifAs. lr\ -Vke yxAamenA He former

0alias Ccvu«V\i ks^HcV Court V5o. S courV c^eA C3W tWllrN r\^-

a^vierWVU recof^e^ 4WA -H\e souA Wanna da\e \tfas Ata 5a-^

AaAe. 4UA Ser\Vet\c£ n^uS \w\feoSeA- <A Motahv* 334 aA Paa£ 111 •

PeV\V\t>(\er reiwew a A^cce^onarA rexne^J (A AW aUve sAaAe<A

^acA *k<^ -fof AW Cou-A -Vo \^\xe brAe/ £&r 4l\e sa\A (UsAr»cV

faae ft I oA 2
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Luby’s, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 29, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Christopher J. Pappas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 30, 2018By:/s/    CHRISTOPHER J. PAPPASChristopher J. PappasPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1GLOBAL CASH ACCESS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the periodic report of Global Cash Access, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, Kirk E. Sanford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to thebest of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.       Dated: August 11, 2005 By: /s/ Kirk E. Sanford             Kirk E. Sanford
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS OF BENTHOS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARY CONTAINED ELSEWHERE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,663
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                       162
<INVENTORY>                                      2,063
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,881
<PP&E>                                           6,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,862
<BONDS>                                            791
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,076
<SALES>                                         16,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,414
<CGS>                                            7,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    57
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  82
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,525
<INCOME-TAX>                                       967
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,558
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,558
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS
NO. 128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          28,135                  28,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,644,678               1,623,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    193,598                 149,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,336,639               2,117,241
<PP&E>                                       2,626,587               2,446,878
<DEPRECIATION>                               (569,832)               (514,771)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,927,006               5,264,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (2,183,937)             (2,026,323)
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                   (75,418)                (75,418)
<COMMON>                                       (1,555)                 (1,533)
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,120,314)             (1,126,530)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (5,927,006)             (5,264,237)
<SALES>                                    (3,160,757)             (3,278,214)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (3,160,757)             (3,278,214)
<CGS>                                        3,035,010               3,170,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,035,010               3,170,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,725                   1,239
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,186                  18,091
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,510)                  35,043
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,534                  11,602
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,976)                (23,441)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,976)                (23,441)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18                    0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17                    0.14


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Geoffrey G. Meyers, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Manor Care, Inc. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
              ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
              Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
              requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
              the Report.

/s/ Geoffrey G. Meyers

Geoffrey G. Meyers
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
November 2, 2004
Exhibit 99.6



Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd.



Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of

Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code







In connection with the report of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, John W. A. McDonald, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Randy L. Denecky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







by /s/ Randy L. Denecky

by /s/ John W. A. McDonald



Randy L. Denecky

John W. A. McDonald

Chief Financial Officer

President and Chief Executive Officer





Date:  March 28, 2005







The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Report solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), is not deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of filing of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in any such filing.
Formal Recommendation by the 

National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) 

to the National Organic Program (NOP)

 

Date: October 28, 2010 

Subject: Sunset review of ferrous sulfate on National List 

Chair: Daniel G. Giacomini 

 

 

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action X 

Guidance Statement 

Other 

 

Statement of the Recommendation (Including Recount of Vote): 

Ferrous sulfate is used to fortify foods. The NOSB makes the following 

recommendation to re-list ferrous sulfate on 7 CFR §205.605(b): 

Ferrous sulfate 

 

The NOSB unanimously passed the motion to relist ferrous sulfate by a vote of 

14-0. 

 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with 

OFPA and NOP): 

 

The recommendation to re-list ferrous sulfate in 7 CFR §205.605(b) was made 

in accordance with the National Organic Program and the NOSB’s Policy & 

Procedures Manual. The substance is consistent with OFPA 1990 and NOP 

regulations and evaluation criteria. 

 

NOSB Vote: 

Moved: John Foster Second: Steve DeMuri

Yes: 14 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recusal: 0 
National Organic Standards Board 

Handling Committee 

Sunset Recommendation – 2012 

Ferrous Sulfate 

September 7, 2010 

List: 205.605 Nonagricultural (nonorganic) substances allowed as ingredients in 

or on processed products labeled as “organic” or “made with organic (specified 

ingredients or food group(s)).” 

(b) Synthetics allowed: 

Ferrous sulfate 

Committee Summary 

Federal register notice of the sunset of these materials brought forth no public 

comments against re-listing ferrous sulfate. Several commenters supported re-listing 

this material. 

Ferrous sulfate is used to fortify foods. 

Review of the original recommendations, historical documents, and public comments 

does not reveal unacceptable risks to the environment, human, or animal health as a 

result of the use or manufacture of these materials. There is no new information 

contradicting the original recommendation which were the basis for the previous NOSB 

decisions to list and re-list these materials. 

Committee Recommendation(s)

The handling committee recommends the renewal of the following substance in this use 

category as published in the final rule: 

Ferrous sulfate—for iron enrichment or fortification of foods when required by 

regulation or recommended (independent organization). 

Committee Vote 

Motion: John Foster Second: Steve DeMuri 

Yes: 6 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 1
# C_2012326EN.01020101.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

PROTOCOL (No 14)

ON THE EURO GROUP

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

DESIRING to promote conditions for stronger economic growth in the European Union and, to that end, to develop ever-closer coordination of economic policies within the euro area,

CONSCIOUS of the need to lay down special provisions for enhanced dialogue between the Member States whose currency is the euro, pending the euro becoming the currency of all Member States of the Union,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Article 1

The Ministers of the Member States whose currency is the euro shall meet informally. Such meetings shall take place, when necessary, to discuss questions related to the specific responsibilities they share with regard to the single currency. The Commission shall take part in the meetings. The European Central Bank shall be invited to take part in such meetings, which shall be prepared by the representatives of the Ministers with responsibility for finance of the Member States whose currency is the euro and of the Commission.

Article 2

The Ministers of the Member States whose currency is the euro shall elect a president for two and a half years, by a majority of those Member States.

---
# C_2016202EN.01006201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/62

---

Article 39

(ex Article 33 TEC)

(ex Article 33 TEC)

1.   The objectives of the common agricultural policy shall be:

| (a) | to increase agricultural productivity by promoting technical progress and by ensuring the rational development of agricultural production and the optimum utilisation of the factors of production, in particular labour; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

to increase agricultural productivity by promoting technical progress and by ensuring the rational development of agricultural production and the optimum utilisation of the factors of production, in particular labour;

| (b) | thus to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

thus to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture;

| (c) | to stabilise markets; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

to stabilise markets;

| (d) | to assure the availability of supplies; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

to assure the availability of supplies;

| (e) | to ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

to ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices.

2.   In working out the common agricultural policy and the special methods for its application, account shall be taken of:

| (a) | the particular nature of agricultural activity, which results from the social structure of agriculture and from structural and natural disparities between the various agricultural regions; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the particular nature of agricultural activity, which results from the social structure of agriculture and from structural and natural disparities between the various agricultural regions;

| (b) | the need to effect the appropriate adjustments by degrees; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the need to effect the appropriate adjustments by degrees;

| (c) | the fact that in the Member States agriculture constitutes a sector closely linked with the economy as a whole. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the fact that in the Member States agriculture constitutes a sector closely linked with the economy as a whole.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00115

- CV

Gerald VERGOTT

, Appellant

v.

BIRDY APARTMENTS, LLC

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CV00393

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED April 15, 2015.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam , Justice
# C_2016202EN.01031101.xml

| | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/311 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/311

---

PROTOCOL (No 29)

ON THE SYSTEM OF PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN THE MEMBER STATES

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

CONSIDERING that the system of public broadcasting in the Member States is directly related to the democratic, social and cultural needs of each society and to the need to preserve media pluralism,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following interpretive provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

The provisions of the Treaties shall be without prejudice to the competence of Member States to provide for the funding of public service broadcasting and in so far as such funding is granted to broadcasting organisations for the fulfilment of the public service remit as conferred, defined and organised by each Member State, and in so far as such funding does not affect trading conditions and competition in the Union to an extent which would be contrary to the common interest, while the realisation of the remit of that public service shall be taken into account.

---
#### Lebis Contracting, Inc., Appellant, v City of Lock-port, Respondent.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: By failing to object to the qualifications of the law secretary to a Supreme Court Justice to serve as either an arbitrator or a Referee, but, rather, by signing an agreement to arbitrate before an arbitrator to be appointed by the court and then submitting to a hearing before him, petitioner has waived any such objections *(see, Matter of Scinta v Scinta,*129 AD2d 262, 265; *Matter of Frankel v Kissena Jewish Center,*144 Misc 2d 548, 550). Likewise, a party who participates in an arbitration proceeding without demanding that the arbitrator take an oath waives the right to object *(see,*CPLR 7506 [f]; *Matter of Institute of Intl. Educ. [Permanent Mission of Spain to United Nations],*118 AD2d 433, 435-436, *lv denied*68 NY2d 608). We have examined *1013petitioner’s remaining argument and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J.—Article 78.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.