alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 8 (Friday, January 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 2427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00319]



[[Page 2427]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-923-1310-FI; WYW144977]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
WYW144977, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as 
amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement from Black Hills Exploration & Productions Inc., 
Chesapeake AEZ Exploration LLC, Chesapeake Exploration LLC, Fossil 
Creek Resources LLC, Jastera LC, Khody Land & Minerals Company, Nerd 
Gas Company LLC, and Slawson Exploration Company Inc., for 
noncompetitive oil and gas lease WYW144977 for land in Niobrara County, 
Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the 
rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. 
Weaver, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at 307-775-6176. Persons 
who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the 
Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact 
the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is 
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question 
with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal 
business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessees have agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $5 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessees have 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $159 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessees 
have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out 
in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate lease WYW144977 
effective April 1, 2012, under the original terms and conditions of the 
lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. The BLM 
has not issued a valid lease to any other interest affecting the lands.

Debra A. Olsen,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 2013-00319 Filed 1-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
#### Eva Chodos, Appellant, v Robert Barresi, Doing Business as Robert Barresi Insurance, Respondent.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered February 26, 1990, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint on the merits, after a non-jury trial, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff asserts that the alleged appearance of bias on the part of the trial court warrants a reversal and a remand for a new trial, based solely on the fact that almost six years prior to the trial she alleges that she had filed a complaint against the Judge with the State Commission on Judicial Conduct. We find this allegation to be without support in the record. While an appearance of bias on the part of a Trial Judge may be proper grounds for reversal, plaintiff’s perception of such bias must be "made in good faith and based upon identifiable factors”. *(People v Zappacosta,*77 AD2d 928, 929.) Here, plaintiff’s complaint about Judge Saks, is not a valid identifiable factor which would warrant a reversal of the instant judgment. (C*f., People v Corelli,*41 AD2d 939.) Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
International Commodity Procurement Division Purchases

FY2018 - Quarter 4

Commodity Qty in MT PO Value Average Cost

BEANS, BLACK BAG-50 KG 230 $191,327.80 $831.86

CORN, YELLOW BAG-50 KG 210 $48,709.50 $231.95

CORNMEAL BAG-HP-25 KG 2,630 $1,104,676.30 $420.03

CORNMEAL, SOY-FORT BAG-HP-25 KG 500 $243,675.80 $487.35

CORN-SOY BLEND PLUS BAG-HP-25 KG 11,510 $7,741,614.30 $672.60

CSB SUPER CEREAL PLUS BOX-10/1.5 KG 1,370 $2,694,553.07 $1,966.77

LENTILS BAG-50 KG 9,660 $4,684,420.40 $484.93

OIL, SOYBEAN, CRUDE, DEGUMMED BULK 16,000 $10,668,400.00 $666.78

OIL, VEGETABLE BOTTLE, PLS-6/4 L 670-719 1,000 $1,050,738.06 $1,050.66

OIL, VEGETABLE CAN-6/4 L 21,501 $25,453,745.77 $1,183.87

OIL, VEGETABLE PAIL-20 L 90 $115,516.44 $1,283.29

PEAS, GREEN, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 630 $262,133.70 $416.09

PEAS, YELLOW, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 28,270 $12,450,071.10 $440.40

PEAS, YELLOW, WHOLE BAG-50 KG 420 $151,317.60 $360.28

RICE, 2/7 LG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 230 $105,938.30 $460.60

RICE, 2/7 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 280 $147,960.40 $528.43

RICE, 3/15 LG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 1,880 $932,068.00 $495.78

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 7,500 $3,780,435.70 $504.06

RICE, MILLED BULK 13,430 $6,864,447.00 $511.13

SORGHUM BAG-50 KG 12,190 $2,544,837.60 $208.76

SORGHUM BULK 59,560 $12,004,868.86 $201.56

SOYBEAN MEAL BULK 12,500 $5,036,125.00 $402.89

WHEAT, HARD RED WINTER BULK 128,590 $28,814,402.70 $224.08

WHEAT, SOFT WHITE BAG-50 KG 2,030 $558,148.50 $274.95

WHEAT, SOFT WHITE BULK 65,540 $14,174,766.30 $216.28

Grand Total 397,750 $141,824,898.20 

Commodity Qty in EA PO Value Average Cost

BAGS, WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE- 50 KG 275,000 $89,470.00 $0.3253
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11275

Summary Calendar

 

MARVIN R. ANSLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HUBE JEAN-LOUIS ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:96-CV-68-BA 

- - - - - - - - - -

April 7, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marvin Ansley (#675445), a state prisoner, has moved for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this appeal from the

partial dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous. He

has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP)

on appeal. The motion for leave to appeal IFP is GRANTED. 

Because the balance in Ansley’s prison trust account, at the

time he filed his notice of appeal was $0.00, no initial partial

filing fee is required. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). Ansley
No. 96-11275

- 2 -

shall make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding

month’s income credited to his account. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of Ansley is directed to

forward payments from his prisoner account to the clerk of the

district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10

until the filing fee of $105 is paid. See id.

Ansley contends that the magistrate judge abused his

discretion in dismissing his claims against Nurses Gray, Maxwell,

and Doe as frivolous. We have reviewed the record, the

magistrate judge’s order, and Ansley’s brief, and hold that the

magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion in determining that

Ansley’s allegations were insufficient to show deliberate

indifference. See Mendoza v. Lynaugh, 989 F.2d 191, 195 (5th

Cir. 1993). There is no reason to believe that Ansley could cure

the defects in his pleading through amendment. 

Ansley has failed to brief any issue with respect to the

dismissal of defendants Dr. Jean-Louis in his official capacity

and B. Prewitt. Those claims are abandoned. Brinkmann v. Dallas

County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

Ansley states that he wishes to assert claims against

Corrections Officers Ortega and McKinnon. Because Ansley has not

yet moved for leave to amend his complaint to state claims

against Ortega and McKinnon, the issue is premature and has not

been considered. 

Ansley’s appeal is without arguable merit and, thus,
No. 96-11275

- 3 -

frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Ansley is cautioned that any future frivolous appeals filed

by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. 

Ansley is cautioned further to review any pending appeals to

ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. 

IFP GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
United States Department of Agriculture 1400 Independence Avenue SW. Policy Memo 11-7

Agricultural Marketing Service Room 2646-South Building

National Organic Program Washington, DC 20250

NOP PM 11-7 Private Label Certification, AMENDED Rev 02 10 31 11 Authorized Distribution: Public 

Page 1 of 1

Policy Memorandum

To: Stakeholders and Interested Parties 

From: Miles McEvoy, Deputy Administrator 

Subject: Retained Memo: “Private Label Certification, AMENDED” 

Date: Original Issue Date – January 31, 2011

Attached is the “Private Label Certification, AMENDED” memo issued by former 

Transportation and Marketing Programs Deputy Administrator Barbara C. Robinson on June 11, 

2008. This memo is being retained by the NOP as a new policy memo and remains in effect. This 

document has been assigned the control number “PM 11-7”.

Enclosure: “Private Label Certification, AMENDED” June 11, 2008 memo
TO: All USDA ACAs 

SUBJECT: "Private Label Certification, AMENDED" 

DATE: June 11, 2008 

On the subject of the so-called "private label certification" issue, there seems to be 

some confusion about recent messages heard in the organic industry. NOP will issue 

guidance on this issue in the near future. For now, however, ACAs who perform 

"private label certification" are expected to use the following guidance: 

1. NOP expects full accountability and traceability in the organic supply chain. 

2. The final handler (private labeler/marketer/commission merchant) may choose the 

ACA to certify product. But that ACA appearing on that product of the final handler must 

be able to address any inquiries about the product, by a consumer or other interested 

party, and is fully responsible for ensuring that the certified operation and organically 

produced product meets all requirements of the NOP regulations. 

3. Provided #1 and #2 are satisfied, ACAs performing "private label certification" will not 

have accreditation placed at risk by the NOP for this activity. 

 If there are any questions about this interim guidance, please contact me. 

Thank you, 

Barbara Robinson 

Director, National Organic Program
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2374

ELENA CHEPURINA, a/k/a Elena Viktorovna Chepurina,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: April 9, 2015 Decided: April 16, 2015

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elena Chepurina, Petitioner Pro Se. Joyce R. Branda, Acting 

Assistant Attorney General, Dalin Riley Holyoak, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Elena Chepurina, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions 

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals 

(“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s 

denial of her requests for asylum and withholding of removal.* 

We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript 

of Chepurina’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We 

conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling 

contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 

U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence 

supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 

U.S. 478, 481 (1992). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the 

reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Chepurina (B.I.A. Nov. 

18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED

 * To the extent that Chepurina seeks to challenge the 

immigration judge’s denial of her request for protection under 

the Convention Against Torture, we lack jurisdiction on the 

ground that Chepurina failed to exhaust her administrative 

remedies before the Board. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2012); 

Massis v. Mukasey, 549 F.3d 631, 638–40 (4th Cir. 2008).
NO. 12-15-00089-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: ROBERT C. MORRIS, 

RELATOR

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Relator, Robert C. Morris, filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus alleging that he 

has been denied certain legal supplies, which violates federal and state law. The respondents are 

Albert Jimenez, Smith Unit Access to Courts Supervisor; Vicky Barrows, TDCJ Access To 

Courts Program Manager; and Cindi Sigsbee, Regional Access to Courts Supervisor. Morris 

requests an order directing the respondents to furnish the legal supplies necessary to provide him 

“meaningful and adequate access to the courts.”

This court’s mandamus jurisdiction is expressly limited to (1) writs against a district 

court judge or county court judge in the court of appeals district, and (2) all writs necessary to 

enforce the jurisdiction of the court of appeals. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (West 

2004). The respondents named in Morris’s mandamus petition are not district judges or county 

court judges. Therefore, this court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over the respondents 

unless mandamus is necessary to enforce the court’s jurisdiction. 

Morris has not shown that mandamus against any of the named respondents is necessary 

to enforce this court’s jurisdiction. Consequently, we lack jurisdiction to grant the requested 

relief. See id. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed. 

Opinion delivered April 15, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 15, 2015

NO. 12-15-00089-CV

IN RE: ROBERT C. MORRIS,

Relator

Original Proceeding from the 349th District Court 

of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 349-6270)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the petition for writ of mandamus filed 

by the Relator herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the petition for writ of mandamus be dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                       1,000

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                          JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                            OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                                               259
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        569
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                       11,954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   1,231
<PP&E>                                                            14,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     6,521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    23,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             11,553
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              2,346
<PREFERRED>                                                        9,325
<COMMON>                                                          22,730
<OTHER-SE>                                                        16,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      23,656
<SALES>                                                           30,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  30,951
<CGS>                                                             15,428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     33,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  (3,406)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   (7,185)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               (7,243)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      (7,243)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        (1.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (1.35)



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

10:30 p.m., Tuesday, January 9, 2013.

# PLACE:

U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE., 3rd Floor, Washington, DC

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Determination on seven original jurisdiction cases.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Patricia W. Moore, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE., 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20530, (202) 346-7001.

Dated: January 3, 2013.

Rockne Chickinell,

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 2013-00112 Filed 1-3-13; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-P
<Page>

                           Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
                         1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
                              Washington, DC 20004
                                Tel: 202.739.3000
                                Fax: 202.739.3001
                              www.morganlewis.com


Michael Berenson
(202) 739-5450
mberenson@morganlewis.com

May 1, 2002

The American Life Insurance Company of New York
The American Separate Account 5
435 Hudson Street, 2nd Floor
New York, New York 10014

Re:  REGISTRATION NO. 333-62662

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Statement of Additional Information contained in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-62662)
for The American Separate Account 5 filed by the Account with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933.

                                                Very truly yours,



                                                MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

                                                By: /s/ Michael Berenson
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                    Michael Berenson
Order entered July 24, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00676-CR

EX PARTE JOHN RIVELLO

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX19-00076-L

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 22, 2019 motion to extend the time to file appellant’s 

brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant’s brief filed on or before July 

25, 2019. The State’s brief shall be due on or before August 14, 2019. 

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
DOT- OST- 1'117-27$5

Schlemmer, Kevin (OST)

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kevin,

Brad Rawson < brad.rawson@skywest.com>

Friday, January 24, 2014 6:23 PM

Schlemmer, Kevin (OST)

RE:Request for clarification on EASproposals for DV~er,d ~f':'!?2 q P 3: 5b

SkyWest's proposal for Jamestown and Devils lake is to provide 11 one-stop round trips at the same subsidy rate as

originally proposed.

If you need any additional details, please let me know.

Brad

From: Kevin.Schlemmer@dot.gov [mailto:Kevin.5chlemmer@dot.gov]

sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 3:45 PM .

To: chowell@f1ygreatlakes.com; dvoss@f1ygreatlakes.com; mmatthews@f1ygreatlakes.com; Brad Rawson; Mike

Thompson

Cc: jmsairport@daktel.com; manager@devilslakeairport.com; Kevin.Adams@dot.gov; Dennis.DeVany@dot.gov

Subject: Request for clarification on EAS proposals for DVL and JMS

Regarding the proposals for Essential Air Service (EAS) at Devils lake and Jamestown, North Dakota, from carriers

holding authority to operate scheduled service, SkyWest Airlines' proposal for service to both communities does not

meet EAS minimums in terms of frequency requirements, specifically 2 daily round trips 6 days a week with not more

than one intermediate stop on each flight per 49 USC41732{b)(1)(a).

Additionally, Great lakes Airlines' current service does not meet the aforementioned EASminimums in terms of

frequency requirements.

Given that neither SkyWest's proposal nor Great lakes' current service meet EASminimum frequency requirements, we

request clarification from both carriers on their proposed service levels at the stated subsidy levels by COB tomorrow

(Thursday, January 23, 2014).

Regards,

Kevin Schlemmer

Chief, Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division

United States Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave SE

Washington, DC 20590

(202) 366-3176 phone

(202) 366-7638 fax

1
lmx10a





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT





	Jonathon P. Reuben
	An Accountancy Corporation
	23440 Hawthorne Blvd. Suite 270
	Torrance, California 90505
	(310) 378-3609








	TO:    The Securities and Exchange Commission
	Washington, D.C. 20549
	 
	RE:    Lightning Marine, Inc.








We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of Lightning Marine, Inc. on Form SB-1, of our report dated April 24, 2002 on the financial statements of Lightning Marine, Inc., appearing in the prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.



We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.






	\S\ Jonathon C. Rueben, CPA
	Jonathon P. Rueben, CPA
	An Accountancy Corporation
	Torrance, California
	April 30, 2002








Page E1






Page 47
# EUR-Lex - 12012M051 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M051

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE VI: FINAL PROVISIONS - Article 51 **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0044 - 0044 *

Article 51

The Protocols and Annexes to the Treaties shall form an integral part thereof.

--------------------------------------------------