alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE § 

HEATH SERVICES § 

Appellant, §

§

v. § No. 04-15-00042-CV

§

AMY W. ROCKWOOD § 

Appellee. § 

APPELLEE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

COMES NOW Appellee Amy W. Rockwood pursuant to Rules 10.5(b) and 38.6(d), Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure, and moves this Court for an extension of time to file her Appellee’s 

Brief, and shows the Court as follows: 

 Appellant’s Brief was filed on March 16, 2015, and Appellee’s Brief is due on April 15, 2015. 

Appellee requests the Court extend her time to file her Brief from April 15, 2015, to April 22, 2015. 

Appellee’s attorney, R. Chris Pittard, has a response to a motion for summary judgment due on 

Friday, April 17, 2015, and a brief due to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on April 20, 

2015. 

 This is Appellee’s first request for an extension and Appellee does not anticipate any more 

requests for extensions of time to file her Brief. This request is not made for the purposes of 

harassment or delay, but so that justice made be done and Appellee’s Brief can be properly prepared. 

 Appellant’s counsel is unopposed to this extension of time to file Appellee’s Brief.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellee respectfully request that this Court 

grant this motion for extension of time to file Appellee’s Brief for seven (7) days from April 15, 

2015, to April 22, 2015.

ACCEPTED

041500042cv

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

4/15/2015 3:20:20 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 4/15/2015 3:20:20 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
2

Respectfully submitted,

FORTÉ & PITTARD, P.L.L.C.

1777 NE Loop 410, Suite 600

San Antonio, Texas 78217

Telephone: (210) 678-3075

Telecopier: (210) 820-2609

By: /s/ R. Chris Pittard

R. CHRIS PITTARD

State Bar No. 00794465

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

AMY W. ROCKWOOD

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Pursuant to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure Appellee’s counsel, R. Chris Pittard, 

conferred with Appellant’s counsel, Drew Harris on this Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief

and he was unopposed to this Motion.

/s/ R. Chris Pittard

R. CHRIS PITTARD

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Appellee’s Motion for Extension to File Brief has been sent by facsimile and e-file on this 15th day 

of April, 2015, to the following counsel of record:

Drew L. Harris

Assistant District Attorney

General Litigation Division

P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711-2548

/s/ R. Chris Pittard

R. CHRIS PITTARD
# C_2012326EN.01033701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

DECLARATIONS

DECLARATIONS

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON,

ANNEXED TO THE FINAL ACT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE WHICH ADOPTED THE TREATY OF LISBON

signed on 13 December 2007

A.   DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

DECLARATIONS CONCERNING PROVISIONS OF THE TREATIES

42.   Declaration on Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Declaration on Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

The Conference underlines that, in accordance with the settled case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, being an integral part of an institutional system based on the principle of conferred powers, cannot serve as a basis for widening the scope of Union powers beyond the general framework created by the provisions of the Treaties as a whole and, in particular, by those that define the tasks and the activities of the Union. In any event, this Article cannot be used as a basis for the adoption of provisions whose effect would, in substance, be to amend the Treaties without following the procedure which they provide for that purpose.

---
Exhibit 10(a)  


 Consent of Williams & Connolly, LLP  


        We hereby consent to the following: (1) the filing of our legal opinion as Appendix E to the Registration Statement being drafted by your law firm
in connection with the proposed merger contemplated by the above-referenced Merger Agreement; and (2) references to the name of our law firm as counsel to Illini and Merger Sub in the
Registration Statement and Proxy being drafted by your law firm in connection with such proposed merger. 


Very
truly yours, 


/s/
Williams & Connolly LLP 


WILLIAMS &
CONNOLLY LLP 




Date: May 3, 2002

 


108
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

Goody's Family Clothing, Inc.
Knoxville, Tennessee

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial information of Goody's Family Clothing, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of and for the periods ended May 1, 2004 and May 3, 2003 as
indicated in our report dated May 19, 2004; because we did not perform an audit,
we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 2004, is incorporated
by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-32357, 33-51210, 33-68520,
333-00052 and 333-09595 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
May 19, 2004
# C_2016203EN.01002101.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/21

---

Article 41

Persons and undertakings engaged in the industrial activities listed in Annex II to this Treaty shall communicate to the Commission investment projects relating to new installations and also to replacements or conversions which fulfil the criteria as to type and size laid down by the Council on a proposal from the Commission.

The list of industrial activities referred to above may be altered by the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, which shall first obtain the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee.

---
**Exhibit
      No. 23(a)**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33−33520
      on Form S−8, Post−Effective Amendment 1 to Registration Statement No. 33−38349
      on Form S−3, Registration Statement No. 333−81278 on Form S−3, Registration
      Statement No. 333−81278−01 on Form S−3, Registration Statement No. 333−81278−02
      on Form S−3, Registration Statement No. 333−81278−03 on Form S−3, Post−Effective
      Amendment 1 to Registration Statement No. 333−69738 on Form S−3, Registration
      Statement No. 333−70332 on Form S−8, Registration Statement No. 333−87274 on
      Form S−3, Post−Effective Amendment 1 to Registration Statement No. 333−47910 on
      Form S−3, Registration Statement No. 333−52328 on Form S−8, Post−Effective
      Amendment 1 to Registration Statement No. 333−89685 on Form S−8, Registration
      Statement No. 333−48164 on Form S−8, Registration Statement No. 333-114237 on
      Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-104951 on Form S-8 and Registration
      Statement No. 333-104952 on Form S-8 of
      our
      reports dated February
      28 ,
      2007
      relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial
      statement schedule of Progress Energy, Inc. (which
      report on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion
      and includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the adoption of new accounting
      principles in 2006 and 2005) and
      management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting, appearing in this
      Annual Report on Form 10−K of Progress Energy, Inc. for the year ended December
      31, 2006.








/s/
      Deloitte & Touche LLP








Raleigh,
      North Carolina


February 28,
      2007
# C_2016202EN.01013201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/132 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/132

---

Article 191

(ex Article 174 TEC)

(ex Article 174 TEC)

1.   Union policy on the environment shall contribute to pursuit of the following objectives:

| — | preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment, |
| --- | --- |

—

preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment,

| — | protecting human health, |
| --- | --- |

—

protecting human health,

| — | prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources, |
| --- | --- |

—

prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources,

| — | promoting measures at international level to deal with regional or worldwide environmental problems, and in particular combating climate change. |
| --- | --- |

—

promoting measures at international level to deal with regional or worldwide environmental problems, and in particular combating climate change.

2.   Union policy on the environment shall aim at a high level of protection taking into account the diversity of situations in the various regions of the Union. It shall be based on the precautionary principle and on the principles that preventive action should be taken, that environmental damage should as a priority be rectified at source and that the polluter should pay.

In this context, harmonisation measures answering environmental protection requirements shall include, where appropriate, a safeguard clause allowing Member States to take provisional measures, for non-economic environmental reasons, subject to a procedure of inspection by the Union.

3.   In preparing its policy on the environment, the Union shall take account of:

| — | available scientific and technical data, |
| --- | --- |

—

available scientific and technical data,

| — | environmental conditions in the various regions of the Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

environmental conditions in the various regions of the Union,

| — | the potential benefits and costs of action or lack of action, |
| --- | --- |

—

the potential benefits and costs of action or lack of action,

| — | the economic and social development of the Union as a whole and the balanced development of its regions. |
| --- | --- |

—

the economic and social development of the Union as a whole and the balanced development of its regions.

4.   Within their respective spheres of competence, the Union and the Member States shall cooperate with third countries and with the competent international organisations. The arrangements for Union cooperation may be the subject of agreements between the Union and the third parties concerned.

The previous subparagraph shall be without prejudice to Member States' competence to negotiate in international bodies and to conclude international agreements.

---
Consent of Independent Auditors


We  consent  to the  inclusion  in the  Annual  Report  (Form  10-K)  and to the
incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement (Form S-8) pertaining
to the Stock Option Plan of Canada  Southern  Petroleum Ltd. of our report dated
March 18, 1999, with respect to the consolidated  financial statements of Canada
Southern  Petroleum Ltd.  included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1998.





                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                             Chartered Accountants

Calgary, Canada
March 30, 1999
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 20, 2015

No. 04-14-00807-CV

Brad and Randi AERY, and the House Intervenors Lloyd House, Robert Eugene House, 

Magdalen House, Judith Ann House, Wayne House, Jimmy R. House, Edna Pawelek Ulbrich, 

Peter Pawelek, Jesse Pawelek, Ruby Pawelek Schumacher, Elizabeth Pawalek Reigh, Roy 

Mitchell Pawelek, Darlene Robinson Williams, Diane Fischer Casey, Mary Kay Fischer Adams 

and Arley House

Appellants

v.

HOSKINS, INC., et al,

Appellees

From the 36th Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas

Trial Court No. M-12-0045-CV-A

Starr Boldrick Bauer, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee Blake C. Hoskins’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date 

been received and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the 

Appellee’s brief is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to May 20, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Daniel Pozza

Ellen Mitchell

Ezra Johnson

R. Clay Hoblit

Jason Allen Newman

Bruce D. Oakley

David William Navarro

Conner Jackson

C. David Kinder

Rosemarie Kanusky
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Johnny Norman, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Collins, J.), rendered on December 6, 1988, convicting defendant of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing defendant to two to four years incarceration, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 12012M003 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 12012M003

**Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - TITLE I: COMMON PROVISIONS - Article 3 (ex Article 2 TEU) **

*
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012, p. 0017 - 0017 *

Article 3

(ex Article 2 TEU)

1. The Union's aim is to promote peace, its values and the well-being of its peoples.

2. The Union shall offer its citizens an area of freedom, security and justice without internal frontiers, in which the free movement of persons is ensured in conjunction with appropriate measures with respect to external border controls, asylum, immigration and the prevention and combating of crime.

3. The Union shall establish an internal market. It shall work for the sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability, a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. It shall promote scientific and technological advance.

It shall combat social exclusion and discrimination, and shall promote social justice and protection, equality between women and men, solidarity between generations and protection of the rights of the child.

It shall promote economic, social and territorial cohesion, and solidarity among Member States.

It shall respect its rich cultural and linguistic diversity, and shall ensure that Europe's cultural heritage is safeguarded and enhanced.

4. The Union shall establish an economic and monetary union whose currency is the euro.

5. In its relations with the wider world, the Union shall uphold and promote its values and interests and contribute to the protection of its citizens. It shall contribute to peace, security, the sustainable development of the Earth, solidarity and mutual respect among peoples, free and fair trade, eradication of poverty and the protection of human rights, in particular the rights of the child, as well as to the strict observance and the development of international law, including respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter.

6. The Union shall pursue its objectives by appropriate means commensurate with the competences which are conferred upon it in the Treaties.

--------------------------------------------------
NICHOLAS A. PIERCE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4185

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 14, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 12  CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
AND PREFERRED DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS  Twelve
  Months Ended30-Sep-04
  
  30-Sep-03
  
  30-Sep-02
  
  30-Sep-01
  
  30-Sep-00(dollars in thousands)Fixed charges, as defined:Interest expense
  
  $
  12,375
  
  $
  12,363
  
  $
  12,384
  
  $
  10,509
  
  $
  10,936Amortization of debt issuance expense
  
  618
  
  696
  
  652
  
  607
  
  607Total fixed charges
  
  $
  12,993
  
  $
  13,059
  
  $
  13,036
  
  $
  11,116
  
  $
  11,543Earnings, as defined:Net income
  
  $
  13,302
  
  $
  9,104
  
  $
  10,762
  
  $
  17,236
  
  $
  15,374Add (deduct):Income taxes
  
  7,559
  
  4,733
  
  5,781
  
  9,278
  
  9,051Fixed charges
  
  12,993
  
  13,059
  
  13,036
  
  11,116
  
  11,543Total earnings
  
  $
  33,854
  
  $
  26,896
  
  $
  29,579
  
  $
  37,630
  
  $
  35,968Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
  
  2.61
  
  2.06
  
  2.27
  
  3.39
  
  3.12Fixed charges and preferred dividend
  requirements:Fixed charges
  
  $
  12,993
  
  $
  13,059
  
  $
  13,036
  
  $
  11,116
  
  $
  11,543Preferred dividend requirements
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  6Total
  
  $
  12,993
  
  $
  13,059
  
  $
  13,036
  
  $
  11,116
  
  $
  11,549Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
  preferred dividend requirements
  
  2.61
  
  2.06
  
  2.27
  
  3.39
  
  3.12
Exhibit 10(a)  


April 22, 2002 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life Insurance Company

2801 Highway 201 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 


Directors:



        We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 1 to
the registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-63328) filed by Protective Life Insurance Company and Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 



	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	



 	

 	



Sincerely,
	

 	
 	

SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ David S. Goldstein
 David S. Goldstein
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended September 30,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                 SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                        23,623,799
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                  1,014,357
<ALLOWANCES>                      78,837
<INVENTORY>                    1,383,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              26,051,339
<PP&E>                         1,773,899
<DEPRECIATION>                 1,130,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                30,654,766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          2,878,295
<BONDS>                          467,718
<COMMON>                         177,023
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                    27,131,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  30,654,766
<SALES>                        5,103,298
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               5,103,298
<CGS>                          1,479,787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  2,349,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 410,914
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                2,753,331
<INCOME-TAX>                     906,364
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            1,846,967
<DISCONTINUED>                 3,578,737
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                   5,425,704
<EPS-BASIC>                       0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.31



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our reports dated November 8, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over
financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Lubys, Inc. and its subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended August 25, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of
Lubys, Inc. and its subsidiaries on Form S-3/A (File No. 333-135057, effective October 12, 2006) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-135058, effective June 16, 2006; File No. 333-81606, effective January 29, 2002; File
No. 333-81608, effective January 29, 2002; File No. 333-55140, effective February 7, 2001; and File No. 333-70315, effective January 8, 1999).



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/    GRANT THORNTON LLP
|                         
|Houston, Texas           
|November 8, 2010
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: April 16, 2015 519588 

________________________________

In the Matter of the Claim of 

MICHAEL J. KELSEY, 

Appellant.

GALSON LABORATORIES, INC., MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Respondent.

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: February 24, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ.

__________

Michael J. Kelsey, East Syracuse, appellant pro se.

SGS North America Inc., Rutherford, New Jersey (Matthew J.

Cowan of counsel), for Galson Laboratories, Inc., respondent.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Dawn

A. Foshee of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

__________

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal

Board, filed November 6, 2013, which ruled that claimant was

disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits

because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Decision affirmed. No opinion. 

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur.
-2- 519588 

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court