alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 10K for year
ended December 31, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
10K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         197,000
<SECURITIES>                                   807,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  719,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     37,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,819,000
<PP&E>                                       3,913,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,998,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,015,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          530,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       268,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,724,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,015,000
<SALES>                                      3,310,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,293,000
<CGS>                                        3,208,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,208,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              76,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                117,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            117,000
<DISCONTINUED>                               (330,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (213,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE VII

GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER

GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER

Article 54

Prohibition of abuse of rights

Nothing in this Charter shall be interpreted as implying any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognised in this Charter or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for herein.

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00055-CV

In re Adrian Acosta

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Adrian Acosta has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to 

compel Pfluger Bars, LLC to make certain business records available for examination. However, 

we lack jurisdiction to issue such a writ of mandamus unless necessary to enforce our 

jurisdiction, which is not implicated here. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(b); see also In re 

Elusive Holdings, Inc., No. 03-21-00563-CV, 2021 WL 6138796, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin 

Dec. 30, 2021, orig. proceeding). The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want 

of jurisdiction. 

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Filed: February 18, 2022
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART FIVE

THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

TITLE III

COOPERATION WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AND HUMANITARIAN AID

COOPERATION WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AND HUMANITARIAN AID

CHAPTER 2

ECONOMIC, FINANCIAL AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION WITH THIRD COUNTRIES

Article 213

When the situation in a third country requires urgent financial assistance from the Union, the Council shall adopt the necessary decisions on a proposal from the Commission.

---
USDA Agricultural Marketing Service 

Pandemic Response and Safety (PRS) Grant Program 

Example Application Form 

The following images are screenshots of the web-based application forms found on the PRS Portal and are intended for informational purposes only. Please visit the 

PRS Portal for more information and to apply for the USDA PRS Grant Program--usda-prs.grantsolutions.gov. 

For questions about this program, please email usda.ams.prs@grantsolutions.gov or call (301) 238-5550. Help desk hours are Monday through Friday, from 9 a.m. to 

9 p.m. Eastern Time. 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender 
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000016104
<NAME> CAGLE'S, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                             226
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    18021
<ALLOWANCES>                                       752
<INVENTORY>                                      32567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 51969
<PP&E>                                          102495
<DEPRECIATION>                                   42808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  139419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23688
<BONDS>                                          48366
<COMMON>                                          5006
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       50136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    139419
<SALES>                                         344886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                344886
<CGS>                                           345498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   345498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (8405)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4120
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1483
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2637
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2637
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012326EN.01039301.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/391 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/391

---

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

TITLE II

FREEDOMS

FREEDOMS

Article 6

Right to liberty and security

Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.

---
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: April 16, 2015 518996 

________________________________

In the Matter of MIGUEL 

VASQUEZ,

Appellant,

v

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner 

of Corrections and 

Community Supervision,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: February 24, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch and Devine, JJ.

__________

Miguel Vasquez, Beacon, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A.

Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Elliott III,

J.), entered May 7, 2014 in Greene County, which dismissed

petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR

article 78, to review a determination of the Central Office

Review Committee denying petitioner's grievance.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, filed a grievance challenging

various aspects of the system implemented to discipline inmates

(see Correction Law §§ 112 [1]; 137 [2]; 7 NYCRR 250.1 et seq.). 

The grievance was denied as unsubstantiated and, upon

administrative review, the Central Office Review Committee upheld

that denial. Petitioner subsequently commenced this CPLR article

78 proceeding and, following joinder of issue, Supreme Court

dismissed the petition. Petitioner now appeals.
-2- 518996 

We affirm. In order to assert a valid grievance, "[a]n

inmate must be personally affected by the policy or issue he/she

is grieving, or must show that he/she will be personally affected

by that policy or issue unless some relief is granted or changes

made" (7 NYCRR 701.3 [b]). Petitioner did not point to any

specific occasion in which he has been, or will be, impacted by

the alleged failings in the disciplinary process. Accordingly,

the Central Office Review Committee rationally determined that

petitioner had not "substantiate[d] any malfeasance by staff"

that would warrant the granting of relief (see Matter of Cliff v

Brady, 290 AD2d 895, 896 [2002], lv dismissed and denied 98 NY2d

642 [2002]). To the extent that the grievance reflects

petitioner's generalized dissatisfaction with the disciplinary

process, such does not present a justiciable controversy (see

Matter of Justice v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1648, 1649 [2010], lv

denied 15 NY3d 710 [2010]; Matter of Cliff v Brady, 290 AD2d at

896).

Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
#### John Senise, Appellant, v Robert A. Mackasek et al., Respondents.

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Francis N. Pécora, J.), entered August 10, 1990, which granted plaintiff’s motion for an order pursuant to CPLR 3126 to the extent of directing defendants to appear for depositions on August 31, 1990, at the New York County Supreme Court, 60 Centre Street, at 10:00 a.m., unanimously modified, on the law the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to grant the motion to the extent of striking defendants’ answer unless, within twenty days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, defendants pay plaintiff a money sanction of $500 and motion costs and is otherwise affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff’s appeal from the order of the same court, entered June 29, 1990, which granted plaintiff’s motion for an order pursuant to CPLR 3126 to the extent of directing defendants to appear for depositions on August 1, 1990, is dismissed as superseded by the appeal from the order entered August 10, 1990, without costs.

IAS’s order entered August 10, 1990 recites that plaintiff’s motion for an order pursuant to CPLR 3126 was returnable on March 13, 1990. In contrast, there is no support in the record for defendants’ assertion, made in their brief, that such motion was adjourned to March 27, 1990. We therefore find that the motion was returnable on March 13, 1990, and that defendants’ service of opposition papers on March 22, 1990 constituted a default on the motion *(see, Romeo v Ben-Soph Food Corp.,*146 AD2d 688, 690 [motion court abused its discretion as a matter of law in accepting tardily submitted papers in opposition with no excuse having been offered for the lateness]). As a condition to vacating the default, we impose a money sanction of $500.

We note that the record contains no indications of any professional courtesies extended by either plaintiff’s attorneys or defendants’ attorneys concerning the implementation of this order, which directed four depositions over a period of nine days. When the first deposition did not take place as scheduled, a phone call might have gone far to straighten matters out. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Smith and Rubin, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of FAO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 3, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry R. Welch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: September 17, 2002 |  | /s/ Jerry R. WelchJerry R. Welch Chief Executive Officer and President
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
# C_2016203EN.01001401.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/14

---

Article 22

1.   If the proprietor of the patent, provisionally protected patent right or utility model and the licensee fail to agree on the amount of compensation, the parties concerned may conclude a special agreement to refer the matter to the Arbitration Committee.

By doing so, the parties waive the right to institute any proceedings other than those provided for in Article 18.

2.   If the licensee refuses to conclude a special agreement, the licence he has been granted shall be deemed void.

If the proprietor refuses to conclude a special agreement, the compensation referred to in this Article shall be determined by the appropriate national authorities.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          82566725
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                    86569214
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  6721343
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               184801846
<CASH>                                          364994
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              990147
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                        12978314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               228885454
<POLICY-LOSSES>                               29811723
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                           43258833
<POLICY-OTHER>                                17890640
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      11419066
<OTHER-SE>                                   105500323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 228885454
<PREMIUMS>                                    77347319
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            7155382
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             8468911
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  382130
<BENEFITS>                                    41165776
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   25387243
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           1293414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               25507309
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7158151
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           18349158
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  18349158
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.66
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                38584084
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                           36041564
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              5124212
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                            15487239
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                              16560258
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                               47702363
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016202EN.01028701.xml

| | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/287 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/287

---

PROTOCOL (No 16)

ON CERTAIN PROVISIONS RELATING TO DENMARK

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT that the Danish Constitution contains provisions which may imply a referendum in Denmark prior to Denmark renouncing its exemption,

GIVEN THAT, on 3 November 1993, the Danish Government notified the Council of its intention not to participate in the third stage of economic and monetary union,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

| 1. | In view of the notice given to the Council by the Danish Government on 3 November 1993, Denmark shall have an exemption. The effect of the exemption shall be that all Articles and provisions of the Treaties and the Statute of the ESCB referring to a derogation shall be applicable to Denmark. |
| --- | --- |

1.

In view of the notice given to the Council by the Danish Government on 3 November 1993, Denmark shall have an exemption. The effect of the exemption shall be that all Articles and provisions of the Treaties and the Statute of the ESCB referring to a derogation shall be applicable to Denmark.

| 2. | As for the abrogation of the exemption, the procedure referred to in Article 140 shall only be initiated at the request of Denmark. |
| --- | --- |

2.

As for the abrogation of the exemption, the procedure referred to in Article 140 shall only be initiated at the request of Denmark.

| 3. | In the event of abrogation of the exemption status, the provisions of this Protocol shall cease to apply. |
| --- | --- |

3.

In the event of abrogation of the exemption status, the provisions of this Protocol shall cease to apply.

---
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE XIX

RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SPACE

RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SPACE

Article 180

(ex Article 164 TEC)

(ex Article 164 TEC)

In pursuing these objectives, the Union shall carry out the following activities, complementing the activities carried out in the Member States:

| (a) | implementation of research, technological development and demonstration programmes, by promoting cooperation with and between undertakings, research centres and universities; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

implementation of research, technological development and demonstration programmes, by promoting cooperation with and between undertakings, research centres and universities;

| (b) | promotion of cooperation in the field of Union research, technological development and demonstration with third countries and international organisations; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

promotion of cooperation in the field of Union research, technological development and demonstration with third countries and international organisations;

| (c) | dissemination and optimisation of the results of activities in Union research, technological development and demonstration; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

dissemination and optimisation of the results of activities in Union research, technological development and demonstration;

| (d) | stimulation of the training and mobility of researchers in the Union. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

stimulation of the training and mobility of researchers in the Union.

---
CERTIFICATION 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE) 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Firstgold Corp. (the “Company”), for the period ended April 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to our knowledge 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                   | FIRSTGOLD CORP.                         |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |                                    |   |
| Dated: October 6, 2009 |                                    |   |
|                   | /s/ Terrence Lynch                      |   |
|                   | Terrence Lynch, Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                   |                                    |   |
|                   |                                    |   |
| Dated: October 6, 2009 |                                    |   |
|                   | /s/ James Kluber                        |   |
|                   | James Kluber, Chief Financial Officer   |   |

 

----