alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3202

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Carolyn Annette Woods, also known as * Western District of Missouri.

Carolyn A. Hamilton, also known as *

Carolyn Johnson, also known as Caroline * [UNPUBLISHED]

Hamilton, also known as Carolyn Graves, *

also known as Carolyn Scoggins, *

 *

Appellant. *

__________

 Submitted: July 24, 1997

 Filed: July 28, 1997

__________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

__________

PER CURIAM.

From approximately 1991, as part of a drug-distribution conspiracy, cocaine and

crack cocaine were distributed from Carolyn Annette Woods’s residence in Kansas

City, Missouri. In May 1994, after a search warrant was executed at Woods’s

residence, authorities recovered loaded handguns and a rifle. Woods later pleaded

guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine and 
The Honorable D. Brook Bartlett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1

the Western District of Missouri.

-2-

cocaine base from December 1989 through November 1994, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 846 and 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). After calculating a Guidelines sentencing range

of 292 to 365 months--which included enhancements for possessing a firearm and for

her aggravating role in the offense--the district court granted the government’s motion 1

for a downward departure from the statutory minimum and Guidelines range, based on

Woods’s substantial cooperation; the court sentenced Woods to 108 months

imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Woods appeals, and we affirm. 

For reversal, Woods argues the district court erred in assessing a 2-level firearm

enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1), and a 3-level

enhancement for being a manager or supervisor under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

Manual § 3B1.1(b). Without these enhancements, Woods would have had a total

offense level of 35 and a resulting Guidelines range of 168 to 210 months. Because

Woods’s 108-month sentence represents a downward departure from that range, her

sentence is unreviewable. See United States v. Baker, 64 F.3d 439, 441 (8th Cir. 1995)

(where district court departs below applicable Guidelines range with or without

challenged enhancement, this court has consistently held sentence is not reviewable).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Itfrf-/V

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 01-13-00259-CR OFFENSE: DWI

STYLE: Alyssa Pullen v. The State ofTexas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: Co Crim Ct at Law No 4

DATE: 08/26/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1817849

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Alyssa Pullen v. The State c f Texas

Petition

CCA* \LM~l4

h?P£LLAHT'S CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

lcf(/$(T() JUDGE:

DATE: 03/jtf/jU/r

JUDGE: flju UoU^U—

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
The USDA prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, 

age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual 

orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in 

employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or 

employment activities.) To file a complaint of discrimination, write: USDA, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of 

Adjudication, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (866) 632-9992 (Toll-free Customer Service), (800) 877-8339 

(Local or Federal relay), (866) 377-8642 (Relay voice users). 

DATE: July 28, 2014

USDA COOKED TURKEY TACO FILLING PURCHASE PROGRAM ANNOUNCED: 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture today announced plans to purchase cooked turkey taco 

filling (100119) for the National School Lunch Program and other Federal food and nutrition 

assistance programs.

A Request for Proposal (solicitation) will be issued in the near future resulting in an Indefinite 

Quantity/Indefinite Delivery (IDIQ) firm, fixed price with economic price adjustment contract.

The solicitation will be issued for deliveries December 1, 2014, through November 30, 2015. 

All proposals must be submitted electronically through the Web-Based Supply Chain 

Management (WBSCM) website at 

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid=WBSCM

Offers submitted by any means other than WBSCM will be considered non-responsive. 

Offerors are urged to review all documents as they pertain to this program. The Qualification 

Requirements for Prospective Vendors, dated June 2014, is available under “New Vendor 

Information” on the AMS Commodity Procurement website at 

www.ams.usda.gov/commoditypurchasing

Offerors must read all terms of the applicable Solicitation when it is issued. To receive electronic 

(e-mail) notification of the issuance of these solicitations, see the “Subscribe to AMS CP News 

(link)” available on the AMS Commodity Procurement website. Inquiries may be made by 

telephoning (202) 720-4517 or addressing the Contracting Officer, USDA/AMS Commodity 

Procurement Staff, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, STOP 0239, Washington, DC 20250-0256. 

An electronic version of this Purchase Announcement can be obtained through the World Wide 

Web via the Commodity Procurement Home Page at: 

http://www.ams.usda.gov/commoditypurchasing
#### In the Matter of Thomas Godbolt, Appellant, v New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered September 18, 1990 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying his request to change his final declaration of delinquency date.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of Justice S. Peter Feldstein.

Mahoney, P. J., Levine, Mercure, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of Justice S. Peter Feldstein.
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 4 (Monday, January 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00020]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. PR09-22-000; PR00-16-000]


Enogex LLC; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on February 1, 2012, Enogex LLC (Enogex) filed a 
refund report in accordance with the unpublished Delegated Letter Order 
dated December 16, 2011, accepting the Stipulation and Agreement of 
Settlement (``Settlement'') filed by Enogex on October 4, 2011, in the 
above-referenced proceedings, as more fully described in the filing.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#01474453424e6f6d686f64527471716e737541676473622f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9fd9dacddcd0f1f3f6f1facceaefeff0edebdff9faedfcb1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 4, 2013.

    Dated: December 26, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-00020 Filed 1-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE.

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT

USDA, AMS, Dairy Program, Standardization Division

1400 Independence Ave., S.W.

Washington, DC 20250

Contact Haiping Li, Food Technologist

Haiping.Li@usda.gov

 Phone 202- 720-1671
Exhibit 10.3


 


FIRST
AMENDMENT TO Employment Agreement


 


This
First Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement dated December 1, 2021 is made by and between Bit Origin Limited
(Former name-China Xiangtai Food Co., Ltd), a Cayman Islands company (the “Company”), and Jiaming Li (the “Executive”)
on May 31, 2022. The Company and the Executive are hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Parties.” This Amendment shall
be effective as of May 31, 2022.


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
entered into an Employment Agreement, dated December 6, 2021 (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
desire to amend Section 1.03 of the Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE,
the Parties hereto agree that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:


 


1.
The following shall be added as subsection (g): 


 


“(g)
Annual Bonus: The Executive shall be eligible to receive an annual bonus the ("Annual Bonus") as reasonably determined by the
Company’s Board of Directors and/or Compensation Committees. The Annual Bonus shall be paid by the Company to the Executive promptly
after determination.”


 


2.
The following shall be added as subsection (h): 


 


“(h)
Equity Awards. Company hereby provides the Executive with grants of 1,422,049 restricted stock units ("Executive Award"), subject
to the vesting schedule displayed below ("Vesting Schedule"). 


 


	Vesting dates	Number of Shares 
	Date of this agreement	474,016 (33.33%)
	April 27, 2023	118,504 (8.33%)
	July 27, 2023	118,504 (8.33%)
	October 27, 2023	118,504 (8.33%)
	January 27, 2024	118,504 (8.33%)
	April 27, 2024	118,504 (8.33%)
	July 27, 2024	118,504 (8.33%)
	October 27, 2024	118,504 (8.33%)
	January 27, 2025	118,504 (8.33%)
	Total	1,422,049 (100%)


 


In
the event of a Change of Control, specified in section 3.01(b), the remaining unvested rsus will vest immediately.”


 






    	 	 	 



     


    

 


3.
Except as modified by this Amendment, the Parties do hereby acknowledge and agree that the Agreement and all other terms and provisions
contained therein shall remain in full force and effect as set forth in the Agreement.


 


[signature page follows]


 






    	 	 	 



     


    




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first written above:





 


 


	 	
    Bit Origin Limited

	 	 
	 	/s/ Lucas Wang 
	 	
    Name: Lucas Wang

    Title:   CEO

	 	 
	 	 
	 	
    Employee 

	 	 
	 	/s/ Jiaming Li
	 	Jiaming Li
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                          18,790
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    293,578
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               334,039
<PP&E>                                          74,498
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 408,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          549,646
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,496
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,206,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   408,537
<SALES>                                        322,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               322,461
<CGS>                                        (225,356)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (225,356)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (282,955)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (1,200)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (193,050)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (193,050)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 16, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00182-CV

ANTHONY CORLETTO, Appellant

V.

WELLINGTON PARK PATIO HOME ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-29865

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed September 23, 2014. 

The record reflects that no motion for new trial was filed. Appellant’s notice of 

appeal was filed December 22, 2014.

The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the judgment is 

signed when appellant has not filed a timely post-judgment motion. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 26.1. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion for 
2

extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, 

files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1, but within the 15-

day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. 

See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617–18 (1997) (construing the 

predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the 15-

day period provided by Rule 26.3.

On March 26, 2015, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). 

Appellant filed a motion to extend time to file a brief, but filed no response to the 

court’s notification of dismissal. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
From: "Robertson, Dougie (Houston)" <Dougie.Robertson@deepwater.com> To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/06/2012 06:03 PM Subject: RE: U.S. Coast Guard requirements

Melanie,

The rules are stipulated under IMO specifically [IMO MSC/Circ. 645]. This is the basis for all DP regulations.

Attached is the pertinent ruling on power plant. Our drilling rigs are specified DP Class 2 or 3. See attached.

Regards

Dougie

Douglas A Robertson Senior Engineering Specialist

Room 741 4 Greenway Plaza

Houston TX 77046 Direct Line 1(713)232-7120 dougie.robertson@deepwater.com 80% Preparation, 20% Application...

From: Melanie King [mailto:King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:55 To: Robertson, Dougie (Houston) Subject: U.S. Coast Guard requirements Hi Dougie, You've mentioned that you have to operate the main engines at 25-50% load due to U.S. Coast Guard requirements. Is there any documentation of these U.S. Coast Guard requirements that you could send

me?

Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mail Code D243-01
RTP, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments may be privileged, confidential, or proprietary to Transocean. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying, relying upon, or disseminating the information, and the sender disclaims any liability for such unauthorized use. Further, if you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message from your computer. Thank you. (See attached file: DNV DP Power Systems (notated).pdf)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2513
BARBARA HOFFMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusMICHAEL HOFFMAN; JOSEPH ROUSE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; JUDGE RICKS; JUDGE MULLINS; JUDGE DRYDEN; JUDGE GOUDY; JUDGE GREENE, JR.; JUDGE KELLER; ASSIGNMENT OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; KERRY ANDERSON; DAVID BOWERS; GALE ANN BELUCCI; RICHARD BACHARACH, M.D.; DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; GINGER HOWARD; INGRID HOFFMAN; SUE HOUSER; PAM ZIOLKOWSKI; BERNIE DIVVER; EASTERN DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 2927-AMD) Submitted: December 17, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1997 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barbara Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se.23 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), as amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, Appellant's personal injury claim. We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hoffman v. Hoffman , No. CA-96-2927-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE AMMAR AL-ALI, DON CAROTHERS,
DAVID DALKE, MOHAMED K. DIAB,
JULIAN M. GOLDMAN, MASSI E. KIANI,
MICHAEL LEE, JEROME NOVAK, ROBERT SMITH,

AND VAL E. VADEN

____________________

2011-1086 (Serial No. 10/153,263)

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J OSEPH R. R E , Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for appellant. With him on

the brief were J OSEPH S. C IANFRANI , J OHN M. G ROVER and

C HRISTINA J. M C C ULLOUGH ; and C OLIN B. H EIDEMAN , of Seattle, Washington.

M ARY L. K ELLY , Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were R AYMOND
T. C HEN , Solicitor and J OSEPH G. P ICCOLO , Associate

Solicitor. Of counsel was S YDNEY O. J OHNSON

, J R

., Associate Solicitor.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM ( R ADER

, Chief Judge, S CHALL and B RYSON

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 7, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                    21,069,504
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2,987,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                  76,619
<INVENTORY>                                4,211,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          28,991,075
<PP&E>                                     4,390,491
<DEPRECIATION>                             3,355,455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            37,457,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,665,810
<BONDS>                                    3,513,137
<COMMON>                                     197,817
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                32,081,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              37,457,764
<SALES>                                   13,685,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          13,685,906
<CGS>                                      5,859,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              5,859,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           6,243,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              31,938
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            2,313,240
<INCOME-TAX>                                 915,420
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        1,397,820
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,397,820
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.07




</TABLE>
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1449 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3033 203rd Street in Olympia Fields, Illinois, 

as the ‘‘Captain Robert L. Martin Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1449 EH

1 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN ROBERT L. MARTIN POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 3033 203rd Street in Olympia 

4 Fields, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Captain Robert L. Martin Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Robert L. 

10 Martin Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1449 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMartin Post Office’’. pia Fields, Illinois, as the ‘‘Captain Robert L. al Service located at 3033 203rd Street in Olym-