Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 8, 2013 / Notices 1247 

to functional estuarine and salt marsh 

habitats. We may also restore a portion 

of the D Street Fill to salt marsh habitat. 

Upland buffers to be provided around 

portions of the restored wetlands would 

be planted with native upland and 

wetland/upland transitional vegetation. 

The major goals of the project are to 

protect, manage, enhance, and restore 

open water coastal wetlands and native 

upland to benefit native fish, wildlife, 

and plant species supported within the 

South San Diego Bay Unit and 

Sweetwater Marsh Unit of the San Diego 

Bay NWR and to provide habitat for 

migratory shorebirds and other saltmarsh-dependent species. 

The uplands portion of the project 

site, which is located within the City of 

San Diego to the west of Interstate 5 

between Main Street to the north and 

Palm Avenue to the south, is included 

entirely within an area managed by the 

Service as a National Wildlife Refuge. 

The eastern portion of the uplands site 

is owned by the Service in fee title, 

while the western portion is leased to 

the Service by the State Lands 

Commission. D Street Fill is located 

west of Interstate 5 and south of the 

Sweetwater River. The Salt Ponds are 

located west of Interstate 5 and south of 

the Chula Vista Marina. 

In order to restore estuarine habitat in 

the Otay River floodplain, we have 

initially estimated that approximately 

75 acres would need to be graded to 

provide both the wetland and upland 

components of the proposed restoration. 

To achieve elevations appropriate for 

supporting the desired estuarine habitat 

types, excavation of 3 to 11 feet of soil 

over an area of approximately 65 acres 

would be required, generating an 

estimated 750,000 to 1 million cubic 

yards of material. The excavated soil 

may be used to create estuarine and salt 

marsh habitats in the salt ponds, with 

the remainder being transported off site 

to an approved disposal site. The 

proposed wetlands would be tidally 

connected to San Diego Bay, directly 

and through the existing Otay River 

channel. Additional grading to 

potentially deepen and widen the Otay 

River channel from the western edge of 

the project site out to the mouth of the 

river, and potentially dredging channels 

in the mudflats to increase tidal 

circulation to the adjacent restored salt 

ponds, may be needed pending 

hydraulic modeling. At the D Street Fill, 

material would be excavated and 

removed to restore historic salt marsh. 

Public Comment 

We are furnishing this second notice 

in accordance with section 1501.7 of the 

NEPA implementing regulations, to 

obtain suggestions and information from 

other agencies and the public on the 

scope of issues to be addressed in the 

EIS. The Service is currently developing 

a range of restoration alternatives to be 

analyzed in the draft EIS, and we invite 

written comments from interested 

parties to ensure identification of the 

full range of alternatives, issues, and 

concerns. Information gathered through 

this scoping process will assist us in 

developing a range of alternatives. A 

detailed description of the proposed 

action and alternatives will be included 

in the EIS. The EIS will also address the 

direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts 

of the alternatives on environmental 

resources and identify appropriate 

mitigation measures for adverse 

environmental effects. 

Written comments we receive become 

part of the public record associated with 

this action. Before including your 

address, phone number, email address, 

or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment, including your personal 

identifying information, may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask us in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

In addition to providing written 

comments, the public is encouraged to 

attend a public scoping meeting to 

provide us with suggestions and 

information on the scope of issues and 

alternatives to consider when drafting 

the EIS. A public scoping meeting will 

be held in San Diego County, California, 

in early 2013. We will mail a separate 

announcement to the public with the 

exact date, time, and location of the 

public scoping meeting. Requests to be 

contacted about the scoping meeting 

should be directed to the contact 

provided under ADDRESSES above. We 

will accept both oral and written 

comments at the scoping meeting. 

Written comments previously provided 

in response to the November 2011 

notice of intent and during the 

December 2011 scoping meeting are part 

of the public record and will be 

considered during our NEPA review. 

Comments submitted previously do not 

need to be resubmitted. 

NEPA Compliance 

We will conduct environmental 

review in accordance with the 

requirements of NEPA, as amended (42 

U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), its implementing 

regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), 

other applicable regulations, and our 

procedures for compliance with those 

regulations. We anticipate that a draft 

EIS will be available for public review 

in the winter of 2014. 

Alexandra Pitts, 

Acting Regional Director, Pacific Southwest 

Region. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00134 Filed 1–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–862] 

Certain Electronic Devices, Including 

Wireless Communication Devices, 

Tablet Computers, Media Players, and 

Televisions, and Components Thereof; 

Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 

United States Code 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

November 30, 2012, under section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Ericsson 

Inc. of Plano, Texas and 

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of 

Stockholm, Sweden. Letters 

supplementing the complaint were filed 

on December 3, December 12, and 

December 19, 2012. The complaint 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain electronic 

devices, including wireless 

communication devices, tablet 

computers, media players, and 

televisions, and components thereof by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of U.S. Patent No. 6,029,052 (‘‘the ‘052 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,058,359 (‘‘the 

‘359 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,278,888 

(‘‘the ‘888 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

6,301,556 (‘‘the ‘556 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 6,418,310 (‘‘the ‘310 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 6,445,917 (‘‘the ‘917 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,473,506 (‘‘the 

‘506 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,519,223 

(‘‘the ‘223 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

6,624,832 (‘‘the ‘832 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 6,772,215 (‘‘the ‘215 patent’’); 

and U.S. Patent No. 8,169,992 (‘‘the ‘992 

patent’’). The complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists or is in the process of being 

established as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337. 

The complainants request that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
1248 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 8, 2013 / Notices 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 

210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2012). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

January 2, 2013, ORDERED THAT— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain electronic 

devices, including wireless 

communication devices, tablet 

computers, media players, and 

televisions, and components thereof that 

infringe one or more of claims 1–3, 5, 

8, 11, 13, 14, and 18 of the ‘052 patent; 

claims 28–33, 36, 37, 39–43, 46, 47, 50, 

51, and 54 of the ‘359 patent; claim 30 

of the ‘888 patent; claims 1–3, 8, 10, 19, 

20, 23, 24, 26–33, 38, 40, 50, 53–55, 57, 

and 62–68 of the ‘556 patent; 1, 4, 6, 9– 

13, and 16–20 of the ‘310 patent; claims 

1, 24–26, 28, 30, and 54 of the ‘917 

patent; claims 1, 4, 6, 7, 17, 20, 22, and 

23 of the ‘506 patent; claims 1–3, 11–14, 

19, 21, 22, and 30–32 of the ‘223 patent, 

claims 1, 4, 9, 10, and 12 of the ‘832 

patent; claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 15, 22, 25, 

26, 29, 32, 34, 45, 46, 49, 52, and 54 of 

the ‘215 patent; claims 1, 3, 5–8, and 

10–15 of the ‘992 patent, and whether 

an industry in the United States exists 

or is in the process of being established 

as required by subsection (a)(2) of 

section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the 

presiding administrative law judge shall 

take evidence or other information and 

hear arguments from the parties and 

other interested persons with respect to 

the public interest in this investigation, 

as appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact and a 

recommended determination on this 

issue, which shall be limited to the 

statutory public interest factors, 19 

U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are: 

Ericsson Inc., 6300 Legacy Drive, Plano, 

TX 75024; 

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericcson, 

Torshamsgatan 23, Kista, 164 83 

Stockholm, Sweden. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 85 

Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, NJ 

07660. 

Samsung Telecommunications America 

LLC, 1301 East Lookout Drive, 

Richardson, TX 75082. 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung 

Electronics Building, 1320–10, 

Seocho 2-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul 

137–857, Republic of Korea. 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: January 3, 2013. 

By order of the Commission. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00149 Filed 1–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–812] 

Certain Computing Devices With 

Associated Instruction Sets and 

Software; Notice of Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Granting a Joint Motion 

To Terminate This Investigation Based 

on a Settlement; Termination of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 18) granting a joint motion 

to terminate this investigation based on 

a settlement. The investigation is hereby 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

James A. Worth, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3065. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with