alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE II

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

Article 310

(ex Article 268 TEC)

(ex Article 268 TEC)

1.   All items of revenue and expenditure of the Union shall be included in estimates to be drawn up for each financial year and shall be shown in the budget.

The Union's annual budget shall be established by the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 314.

The revenue and expenditure shown in the budget shall be in balance.

2.   The expenditure shown in the budget shall be authorised for the annual budgetary period in accordance with the regulation referred to in Article 322.

3.   The implementation of expenditure shown in the budget shall require the prior adoption of a legally binding Union act providing a legal basis for its action and for the implementation of the corresponding expenditure in accordance with the regulation referred to in Article 322, except in cases for which that law provides.

4.   With a view to maintaining budgetary discipline, the Union shall not adopt any act which is likely to have appreciable implications for the budget without providing an assurance that the expenditure arising from such an act is capable of being financed within the limit of the Union's own resources and in compliance with the multiannual financial framework referred to in Article 312.

5.   The budget shall be implemented in accordance with the principle of sound financial management. Member States shall cooperate with the Union to ensure that the appropriations entered in the budget are used in accordance with this principle.

6.   The Union and the Member States, in accordance with Article 325, shall counter fraud and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union.

---
1The Honorable Donald E. O'Brien, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1604

___________

Michael Lang, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Northern District of Iowa.

*

Russell Rogerson, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: November 13, 2000

Filed: November 28, 2000

___________

Before BOWMAN, HEANEY, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Lang appeals the order of the District Court1 denying Lang's 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He argues, as he did in the District Court,

that (1) the state's evidence was constitutionally insufficient to support his conviction

under Iowa law for kidnapping, and (2) he was denied the effective assistance of trial

and appellate counsel. Having carefully reviewed the case, we find that the District

Court did not err in its determinations and that Lang's claims for habeas relief were
2–

correctly denied. We affirm on the basis of the reasoning set forth in the District

Court's thorough and well-considered opinion.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE III

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

Article 35

1.   Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (1) shall not apply to Croatia for the whole programming period 2007-2013.

1

In the year 2013, Croatia shall be allocated EUR 27,7 million (current prices) under the Rural Development Component referred to in Article 12 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006.

2.   Temporary additional rural development measures for Croatia are laid out in Annex VI.

3.   The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, adopt rules necessary for the application of Annex VI. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 90(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 in conjunction with Article 13(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers (2) or the relevant procedure as determined in the applicable legislation.

2

4.   The Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission, and after consulting the European Parliament, shall make any adaptations to Annex VI, where necessary, to ensure coherence with the regulations concerning rural development.

---

(1)  OJ L 277, 21.10.2005, p. 1 and OJ L 286M, 4.11.2010, p. 26.

1

(2)  OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9535]



[[Page 23766]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 
92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources 
(<greek-i>1119).
    Date/Time:
May 9, 2012; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
May 10, 2012; 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.

    Place: NSF Headquarters, Room 375, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: YeVonda McIlwaine, National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-8600, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ff6e2ece6e3f8eee6cfe1fce9a1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aed7c3cdc7c2d9cfc7eec0ddc880c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice with respect to the 
Foundation's science, technology, engineering, and mathematics 
(STEM) education and human resources programming.

Agenda

May 9, 2012

    Morning Refreshments/Introductions, 2013 Budget and Planning, 
EHR's R&D Core Launch, E2 Joint Committee with MPS, Moving Forward--
New Direction, Committee Business with Director and Deputy Director, 
Reception

May 10, 2012

    STEM Education: A Matter of Priority, Program Review, Discussion 
with Director.

    Dated: April 17, 2012.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-9535 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.1    
  


 
 

AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO    
  


        This Amendment Number Two (the "Amendment") is made this 27th day of March, 2002 by and between Interactive Software Systems, Inc., a corporation duly
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado (the "Seller"), and Allen Systems Group, Inc., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware
(the "Buyer"). 


        WHERAS,
the Buyer and the Seller are parties to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 30, 2000 (collectively with the exhibits, schedules and ancillary agreements
thereto, the "Agreement"). 


        WHEREAS,
the Buyer and the Seller wish to amend the Agreement on the terms herein. 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Buyer and the Seller hereby agree as follows: 


        1.    The
Buyer shall pay to the Seller One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) (the "Payment"), via wire transfer or certified check within 15 days of the date hereof, in
complete satisfaction, settlement and early retirement of the Buyer's obligation to pay the Seller the outstanding debt amount of $7,254,156.26 owing by Buyer to Seller. 


        2.    Simultaneously
with the receipt of the Payment, the Seller shall forever release the Buyer from all liability in connection with the Purchase Price which was to be paid
by the Buyer to the Seller, including any Purchase Price payments to be made in respect of any time periods after the quarter ended December 31, 2001. Should Buyer fail to pay Seller the amount
due in paragraph 1, above, within 15 days of the date of this Amendment, Seller at its option may declare this Amendment null and void. 



        3.    The
amendments set forth in this Amendment shall be effective as of the date hereof, unless expressly provided otherwise herein. 


        4.    All
capitalized terms used, but not defined, herein, shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. 


        5.    Except
as amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 


        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 



	ALLEN SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.	 	INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
	

/s/  ARTHUR L. ALLEN      
 Name: Arthur L. Allen

Title: President/CEO	
 	

/s/  J. L. HUITT, JR.      
 Name: J. L. Huitt, Jr.

Title: President











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HomePatient, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph F. Furlong, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

This Certification is executed as of August 10, 2005.


                                       /s/ Joseph F. Furlong, III
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Joseph F. Furlong, III
                                       Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VII

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

CHAPTER 3

APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

Article 118

In the context of the establishment and functioning of the internal market, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish measures for the creation of European intellectual property rights to provide uniform protection of intellectual property rights throughout the Union and for the setting up of centralised Union-wide authorisation, coordination and supervision arrangements.

The Council, acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure, shall by means of regulations establish language arrangements for the European intellectual property rights. The Council shall act unanimously after consulting the European Parliament.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40230 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS GONZALEZ-HUITRON, also known as Jesse Gonzales, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:99-CR-53-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - October 19, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Gonzalez-Huitron (Gonzalez) moves for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez has received copies of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s Anders brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
#### In the Matter of L & R Wines and Liquors, Inc., Petitioner, v New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of the respondent New York State Liquor Authority, dated September 26, 1989, which, after a hearing, found that the petitioner had violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1), and ordered a deferred 15-day suspension of the petitioner’s off-premises liquor license plus a $1,000 bond forfeiture.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The petitioner was charged with a violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1), which prohibits the sale of alcohol to persons under 21 years old. At the hearing, evidence was adduced that an employee of the petitioner deliv*571ered alcoholic beverages to an underaged police aide. The police aide was participating in a police investigation whereby he would call local liquor stores and order alcohol to be delivered to him at an apartment. The respondent New York State Liquor Authority sustained the charge against the petitioner and ordered a penalty of a deferred 15-day suspension plus a $1,000 bond forfeiture.

We find that the determination by the New York State Liquor Authority is supported by substantial evidence and must be confirmed *(see, Matter of Oster v New York State Liq. Auth.,*125 AD2d 859). Further, we find that assuming, as the petitioner contends, the defense of entrapment is available in an administrative proceeding such as this one, the petitioner has not established the merits of the defense. The conduct by the police merely afforded the petitioner an opportunity to commit the offense *(see, Matter of Viloria v Sobol,*152 AD2d 92; *Matter of Freyman v Board of Regents,*79 AD2d 719).

We further find that the penalty imposed is not shocking to one’s sense of fairness and should not be disturbed *(see, Matter of Shore Haven Lounge v New York State Liq. Auth.,*37 NY2d 187; *Matter of Vargas v New York State Liq. Auth.,*1ll AD2d 925; *Matter of Ira Wyman Inc. v New York State Liq. Auth.,*170 AD2d 991; *Matter of Heiss v Duffy,*149 AD2d 902). Balletta, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6710** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. RONALD LEE WILSON, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00023

- WO

- 1 )

Submitted : January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Ronald Lee Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Randall Stuart Galyon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United Sta tes Attorney , Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Lee Wilson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (20 12 ) motion for
sentenc e reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilson , No. 1:09

- cr - 00023

- WO

- 1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2013) ; see United
States v. Black , 737 F.3d 28 0, 287 (4th Cir. 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

Appellant,

v.

JOSHUA A. COTTRELL and 

LAUREN M. SMITH,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4222

____________________________/

Opinion filed April 15, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Division of Administrative Hearings, James H. 

Peterson, III, Judge.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Revenue correctly asserts that the Final Administrative 

Support Modification Order entered by the Administrative Law Judge was in error 

because the subject-matter jurisdiction of Division of Administrative Hearings was

not properly invoked under section 409.2563, Florida Statutes (2014). See Dep’t 

of Revenue v. Dove, 152 So. 3d 1278 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). The order on appeal is 
vacated, and the case is remanded to the Division of Administrative Hearings with 

instructions to enter an order directing the Department of Revenue to begin 

modification proceedings under section 409.2563.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CLARK, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2016203EN.01002901.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/29

---

Article 69

The Council may fix prices, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission.

When the Agency lays down, in pursuance of Article 60, the terms on which orders can be met, it may propose to the users who have placed orders that prices be equalized.

---
**Exhibit23**

 

**INDEPENDENTAUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.333-69516 on Form S-3 and Nos. 33-61035, 33-39873, 333-87228, and 333-88419 onForm S-8 of Cascade Natural Gas Corporation of our report datedNovember 21, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CascadeNatural Gas Corporation.

 

 
| DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
| Seattle, Washington       |
| December 19, 2003    |

 

----
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 1

THE INSTITUTIONS

SECTION 5

SECTION 5

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Article 258

(ex Article 226 TEC)

(ex Article 226 TEC)

If the Commission considers that a Member State has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaties, it shall deliver a reasoned opinion on the matter after giving the State concerned the opportunity to submit its observations.

If the State concerned does not comply with the opinion within the period laid down by the Commission, the latter may bring the matter before the Court of Justice of the European Union.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

January 25, 2013

p0122

Order 

January 25, 2013

146099

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146099

COA: 305644

Washtenaw CC: 10-001781-FC

RICHARD CHARLES GENTRY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 13, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tom Brown, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James D. Lightner, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/JAMES D. LIGHTNER Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentAugust 5, 2003

---