alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00283]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ASTM International Standards

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 12, 2012, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International 
(``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions 
or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of 
current, ongoing ASTM standards activities originating between 
September and December 2012 designated as Work Items. A complete 
listing of ASTM Work Items, along with a brief description of each, is 
available at http://www.astm.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
10, 2012. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on October 11, 2012 (77 FR 61786).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-00283 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
Exhibit 99.1

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of FAO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 2, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry R. Welch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|Date: December 17, 2002 |  | /s/ Jerry R. WelchJerry R. Welch
Chief Executive Officer and President
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
| (1)   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   |                                                           |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:      August 14, 2008 | By:    | /s/      John Horton                                           |
|                        |   | Chief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |
\ot%-m

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 03-13-00701-CR OFFENSE: 38.04

Johnny Ferris aka Johnny Wayne

STYLE: Ferris v.The state of Texas COUNTY: Tom Green

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 51st District Court

DATE: 06/24/14 Publish: NO TC CASE #: A-13-0162-SB

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Johnny Ferris aka Johnny Wayne

STYLE: Ferris v. The State of Texas CCA#: lQ2t-/¥

?*nsz Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

^P^

DATE: N<?jesh'fi0l Jlj 2orf

JUDGE:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 136 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 136

To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect unpaid interns in the 
 Federal Government from workplace harassment and discrimination, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

Mr. Cummings (for himself, Ms. Meng, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Ms. Norton, 
 and Mr. Meadows) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect unpaid interns in the 
 Federal Government from workplace harassment and discrimination, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Intern Protection Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2302 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g)(1) All protections afforded to an employee under 
subparagraphs (A), (B), and (D) of subsection (b)(1) shall be afforded, 
in the same manner and to the same extent, to an intern and an 
applicant for internship.
    ``(2) For purposes of the application of this subsection, a 
reference to an employee shall be considered a reference to an intern 
in--
            ``(A) section 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 
        U.S.C. 2000e-16);
            ``(B) sections 12 and 15 of the Age Discrimination in 
        Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 631, 633a); and
            ``(C) section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 
        U.S.C. 791).
    ``(3) In this subsection, the term `intern' means an individual who 
performs uncompensated voluntary service in an agency to earn credit 
awarded by an educational institution or to learn a trade or 
occupation.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 3111(c)(1) of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting ``section 2302(g) (relating to 
prohibited personnel practices),'' before ``chapter 81''.
                                 <all>
```
J. 

go 

Pickering 

, J. 

124 Nev. 1, 20, 174 P.3d 970, 982 (2008). In the context of unobjected-to 

misconduct, the attorney's conduct must rise to plain error to warrant a 

new trial; and plain error in this context is an "irreparable and 

fundamental error . . . that results in a substantial impairment of justice 

or denial of fundamental rights such that, but for the misconduct, the 

verdict would have been different." Id. at 19, 174 P.3d at 982. Having 

reviewed the briefs and appendices filed in this matter, we conclude that 

no such "substantial impairment of justice or denial of fundamental 

rights" occurred during voir dire or the closing arguments, and therefore, 

the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Campbell's motion 

for a new trial. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

P, I 

Gibbons 

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge 

William C. Turner, Settlement Judge 

Thomas & Springberg, P.C. 

Pyatt Silvestri & Hanlon 

Mandelbaum, Ellerton & Associates 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A e
<PAGE>   1
                                                           Exhibit (10)(xiv)(c)



                             BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC.
                              1997 INCENTIVE PLAN


<TABLE>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                      <C>
Participation            Management staff with ability to impact company performance
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial Measurement    EVA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Award             Percentage of salary. Based on market data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Weight            100% Financial, modified + or -20% by Performance vs. Individual Performance Objectives (IPOs)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Award Amount             Infinite, both + and -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Banking                  Award Amount in excess of 100% Target Award or below 0 Target Award is banked
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Award Payment            Target Award plus 1/3 of bank;
                         Negative amount is paid off as follows:
                              50% in each of the next two years an award is generated
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Larry C. Miller, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
Butler Manufacturing Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the company for the year period
December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
company. March 12, 2004
    
    /s/ Larry C. MillerDated
    
    Larry C. Miller
Vice President  Finance,
and Chief Financial Officer
 A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO BUTLER MANUFACTURING COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY
AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-0916; Dir ID 2011-NM-127-AD Record of Contacts
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1267 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1267

    To designate a mountain ridge in the State of Montana as ``B-47 
                                Ridge''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2019

Mr. Gianforte introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To designate a mountain ridge in the State of Montana as ``B-47 
                                Ridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``B-47 Ridge Designation Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF B-47 RIDGE, MONTANA.

    (a) Designation.--
            (1) In general.--The unnamed mountain ridge located at 
        4514'40.89"N, 11043'38.75"W that runs south and west of 
        Emigrant Peak in the Absaroka Range in the State of Montana, 
        which is the approximate site of a crash of a B-47, shall be 
        known and designated as ``B-47 Ridge''.
            (2) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
        document, paper, or other record of the United States to the 
        ridge described in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a 
        reference to ``B-47 Ridge''.
    (b) Authorization for Plaque.--
            (1) In general.--A plaque that memorializes the crash of 
        the B-47 (including denoting the names of the victims of the 
        crash) may be installed on B-47 Ridge.
            (2) Funding.--No Federal funds may be used to design, 
        procure, install, or maintain the plaque authorized under 
        paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
United States Department of Agriculture 1400 Independence Avenue SW. Notice 11-3 

Agricultural Marketing Service Room 2646-South Building 

National Organic Program Washington, DC 20250 

NOP Notice 11-3Corn Steep Liquor 01 31 11 Authorized Distribution: Public 

Page 1 of 1 

Notice to Stakeholders and Interested Parties 

To: Stakeholders and Interested Parties 

From: Miles McEvoy, Deputy Administrator 

Subject: Corn Steep Liquor 

Date: January 31, 2011 

The National Organic Program (NOP) is allowing the continued use of corn steep liquor to be 

used as a nonsynthetic input in organic crop production. 

Corn steep liquor is a product of the corn wet milling process. For many years corn steep liquor 

has been considered nonsynthetic by the National Organic Program (NOP), the Organic 

Materials Review Institute (OMRI), and accredited certifying agents. In 2009 questions were 

raised of whether the addition of sulfur dioxide during the steeping portion of the wet milling 

process causes chemical changes and therefore classifies corn steep liquor as a synthetic 

substance. 

The National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) is authorized to review and approve substances 

used in organic production and handling. The NOSB reviewed the corn wet milling process 

during their fall 2010 meeting to determine whether corn steep liquor is nonsynthetic or 

synthetic. At this time the full board has yet to vote on a final recommendation. If the NOSB 

determines that corn steep liquor is synthetic, then future uses of the ingredient will be prohibited 

after a 24 month implementation period unless it is added to the National List of Allowed and 

Prohibited Substances. If the NOSB determines that corn steep liquor is nonsynthetic then it will 

continue to be allowed in organic crop production. 

Document Control: 

This document supersedes the National Organic Program Policy Notification on corn steep liquor 

dated November 10, 2009, which is now obsolete.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEON SLOAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 410 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40332 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. LUIS ENRIQUE LOPEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-34-ALL Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Luis Enrique Lopez violated the conditions of his term of supervised release, imposed on him by the district court for the Southern District of Mississippi in 2003, by returning to the United States illegally. After it executed an acceptanc

e of a transfer of jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3605, the district court for the Southern District of Texas revoked Lopez’s term of supervised release and sentenced him to serve 24 months in prison, with that United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 18, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40332

2 term to run consecutively to his new il legal reentry sentence of 41 months of imprisonment. Lopez appeals the revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction over him because the order transferring jurisdiction had not been signed by a j udge of the Southern District of Mississippi, the transferring court. At no time during the district court proceedingsdid Lopez dispute the authenticity of the transfer document or object to having the revocation action heard in Texas or otherwise challenge the revocation proceedings. We ordered a limited remand to the district court for the purpose oftaking such further action as needed todeterminewhether clerical error was the reason for the transfer order’s omission ofthe signature ofthejudge ofthe transferring court. See F ED
. R. C RIM
. P

. 36 (a district court may “correct an error in the record arising from oversight or omission” at any time). Based on documentation produced by the transferring court and entered into evidence without objection, the district court determined that the transf erring court had electronically signed the transfer order prior toany action being taken on the motion to revoke. Consequently, the district court had j urisdiction to revoke Lopez’s term of supervised release. AFFIRMED.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART FIVE

THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

THE UNION'S EXTERNAL ACTION

TITLE VI

THE UNION'S RELATIONS WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS AND THIRD COUNTRIES AND UNION DELEGATIONS

THE UNION'S RELATIONS WITH INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS AND THIRD COUNTRIES AND UNION DELEGATIONS

Article 220

(ex Articles 302 to 304 TEC)

(ex Articles 302 to 304 TEC)

1.   The Union shall establish all appropriate forms of cooperation with the organs of the United Nations and its specialised agencies, the Council of Europe, the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

The Union shall also maintain such relations as are appropriate with other international organisations.

2.   The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Commission shall implement this Article.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Bruce A. Williamson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Dynegy Inc. (Dynegy);



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Dynegy as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. Dynegys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Dynegy and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Dynegy, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of
Dynegys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such
evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this
quarterly report any change in Dynegys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Dynegys
internal control over financial reporting; and



5.
Dynegys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Dynegys auditors and the audit committee of Dynegys board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Dynegys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Dynegys internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                                 
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: January 19, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    BRUCE A.
WILLIAMSON                                                      
|                       |  |     |  | Bruce A. Williamson President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
# QuarterlyTruckRatesforUSAverage
**Exhibit
      No. 23(a)**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33−33520
      on Form S−8, Post−Effective Amendment 1 to Registration Statement No. 33−38349
      on Form S−3, Registration Statement No. 333−81278 on Form S−3, Registration
      Statement No. 333−81278−01 on Form S−3, Registration Statement No. 333−81278−02
      on Form S−3, Registration Statement No. 333−81278−03 on Form S−3, Post−Effective
      Amendment 1 to Registration Statement No. 333−69738 on Form S−3, Registration
      Statement No. 333−70332 on Form S−8, Registration Statement No. 333−87274 on
      Form S−3, Post−Effective Amendment 1 to Registration Statement No. 333−47910 on
      Form S−3, Registration Statement No. 333−52328 on Form S−8, Post−Effective
      Amendment 1 to Registration Statement No. 333−89685 on Form S−8, Registration
      Statement No. 333−48164 on Form S−8, Registration Statement No. 333-114237 on
      Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-104951 on Form S-8 and Registration
      Statement No. 333-104952 on Form S-8 of
      our
      reports dated March 6, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements
      and consolidated financial statement schedule of Progress Energy, Inc. (which
      report on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion
      and includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the adoption of new accounting
      principles in 2005 and 2003) and
      management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting, appearing in this
      Annual Report on Form 10−K of Progress Energy, Inc. for the year ended December
      31, 2005.








/s/
      Deloitte & Touche LLP








Raleigh,
      North Carolina


March
      6,
      2006