alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1293 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1293

 To prohibit the use of amounts appropriated for military construction 
 or the Army Corps of Engineers for the construction of barriers, land 
acquisition, or any other associated activities on the southern border 
        without specific statutory authorization from Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2019

   Mr. Vela (for himself, Mr. Vargas, and Mr. Lujan) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of amounts appropriated for military construction 
 or the Army Corps of Engineers for the construction of barriers, land 
acquisition, or any other associated activities on the southern border 
        without specific statutory authorization from Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restrictions Against Illegitimate 
Declarations for Emergency Re-appropriations Act of 2019'' or the 
``RAIDER Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON USE OF EMERGENCY FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 
              BARRIERS OR LAND SEIZURE ALONG THE SOUTHERN BORDER.

    Notwithstanding section 201 of the National Emergencies Act of 1976 
(50 U.S.C. 1621), section 2808 of title 10, United States Code, section 
923 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2293), or 
any other provision of law, no funds appropriated or otherwise made 
available prior to the date of the enactment of this Act may be used 
for the construction of barriers, land acquisition, or any other 
associated activities on the southern border without specific statutory 
authorization from Congress.
                                 <all>
```
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1381 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to take actions 

necessary to ensure that certain individuals may update 

the burn pit registry with a registered individual’s cause 

of death, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1381 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Burn Pit Registry En3 hancement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. BURN PIT REGISTRY UPDATES. 

5 (a) INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO UPDATE.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 

7 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec8 retary of Veterans Affairs shall take actions nec9 essary to ensure that the burn pit registry may be 

10 updated with the cause of death of a deceased reg11 istered individual by— 

12 (A) an individual designated by such de13 ceased registered individual; or 

14 (B) if no such individual is designated, an 

15 immediate family member of such deceased reg16 istered individual. 

17 (2) DESIGNATION.—The Secretary shall pro18 vide, with respect to the burn pit registry, a process 

19 by which a registered individual may make a des20 ignation for purposes of paragraph (1)(A). 

21 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

22 (1) The term ‘‘burn pit registry’’ means the 

23 registry established under section 201 of the Dig24 nified Burial and Other Veterans’ Benefits Improve25 ment Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–260; 38 U.S.C. 

26 527 note). 
3 

•HR 1381 EH

1 (2) The term ‘‘immediate family member’’, with 

2 respect to a deceased individual, means— 

3 (A) the spouse, parent, brother, sister, or 

4 adult child of the individual; 

5 (B) an adult person to whom the indi6 vidual stands in loco parentis; or 

7 (C) any other adult person— 

8 (i) living in the household of the indi9 vidual at the time of the death of the indi10 vidual; and 

11 (ii) related to the individual by blood 

12 or marriage. 

13 (3) The term ‘‘registered individual’’ means an 

14 individual registered with the burn pit registry. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1381 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to take 

purposes. istered individual’s cause of death, and for other uals may update the burn pit registry with a regactions necessary to ensure that certain individ-
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.32

                       CERTIFICATE OF RETIREMENT OF STOCK

          LEXINGTON PRECISION CORPORATION, a corporation organized and

existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware ("the

Corporation") ,


DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

          FIRST: That the Corporation acquired an aggregate of Four Hundred
Fifty (450) shares of the Corporation's $4 - $8 Cumulative Convertible Preferred
Stock, Series B, par value $100 per share, which shares had capital applied in
connection with their acquisition and which shares upon their acquisition became
retired shares.

          SECOND: That the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation prohibits the reissue of the shares of $4 - $8 Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B, when so retired; and pursuant to the
provisions of Section 243 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, upon the effective date of the filing of this certificate as therein
provided, the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be
amended so as to effect a reduction in the authorized number of shares of the $4
- $8 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B, to the extent of Four
Hundred Fifty (450) shares, being the total number of shares retired with a par
value of $100 per share, and an aggregate par value of $45,000.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be

signed by Dennis J. Welhouse, its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial

Officer, and attested to by Kelly L. MacMillan, its Treasurer, this 13th day of

January, 1999.

                                      LEXINGTON PRECISION CORPORATION

                                      By:    Dennis J. Welhouse
                                         -------------------------------
                                             Dennis J. Welhouse
                                             Senior Vice President
                                             and Chief Financial Officer

ATTEST:

By:    Kelly L. Macmillan
   ---------------------------
       Kelly L. MacMillan
       Treasurer
#### STEWART SUPPLY COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 156, Docket 28325.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 22, 1963.

Decided Nov. 8, 1963.

*234Salem G. Mansour, Niagara Falls, N. Y., for petitioner.

Donald W. Williamson, Jr., Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., (John B. Jones, Jr., Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and Meyer Rothwacks, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

During the summer of 1956 there was a severe wind and rain storm in the vicinity of the taxpayer’s business premises in Niagara Falls, New York. Some months later, in a stretch of cold weather, it was discovered that the front wall of the building was separated from the building and it became necessary to replace the'entire wall. The sole issue before us is whether the cost of replacing the wall was an “ordinary and necessary” business expense, deductible from income pursuant to Section 162(a) of the 1954 Internal Revenue Code, as contended by the taxpayer, or as a capital expenditure to be recovered through periodic deductions for depreciation, as contended by the Commissioner and held by the Tax Court. Cases of this type, in which the taxpayer is denied the deduction as an expense, always involve some hardship; but we are persuaded that the substantial expenditure necessary to make the repairs resulted, at least to an appreciable extent, in an increase in the value of the building and prolonged its life. The Tax Court was not bound to accept at face value the testimony of the taxpayer’s witnesses to the contrary. We are satisfied that the record supports the conclusions of fact and law arrived at by the Tax Court.

Affirmed.
Expires 11-30-2017

Expires 11-30-2017

Expires 11-30-2017

- U.S. Department Of Agriculture
Grain Inspection, Packers And Stockyards Administration
- Section 1 - General Information
- 3c.  Cell Phone No.
- 4.  E-mail Address
- Section 2 - Description Of Business
- 8.  The poultry firm is a (check all that apply)
- Section 3 - Live Poultry Purchases
- Section 4 - Live Poultry Produced Under Growing Arrangements
- Section 5 - Poultry Product Sales
- Section 6 - Poultry Product Sold
- Section 7 – Remarks
- The Packers and Stockyards Act provides in part that “any person who shall willfully make, or cause to be made, any false entry or statement of fact in any report required to be made under this Act ... shall be deemed guilty of an offense against the United States, and shall be subject, upon conviction in any court of the United States of competent jurisdiction, to a fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $5,000, or to imprisonment ...”
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jacqueline L. Harris, Appellant.

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.), rendered June 30, 1989, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of arson in the third degree.

Contrary to defendant’s claim, County Court did not err in failing to instruct the jury on the charge of arson in the fourth degree as a lesser included offense of arson in the third degree. Initially, we note that counsel for defendant never requested that such a charge be made and no objection was made to the charge as given. Therefore, the issue was not properly preserved for review *(see, People v Jackson,*169 AD2d *837887; *People v Moon,*121 AD2d 790, *lv denied*68 NY2d 815). Furthermore, the circumstances of this case do not warrant a reversal of the conviction in the interest of justice *(see, People v Murphy,*128 AD2d 177, *affd*70 NY2d 969). We also reject defendant’s contention that the prison sentence she received of 3 to 9 years was harsh and excessive. The sentence was well within the statutory guidelines and, given the serious nature of the crime involved, there was no abuse of discretion by the court in imposing sentence *(see, People v Pierce,*150 AD2d 948, *lv denied*74 NY2d 817; *People v Whalen,*99 AD2d 883).

Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 17, 2015

p0414

Order 

Clerk

April 17, 2015

151293

In re J J HENDRICKSON, Minor. SC: 151293

COA: 322278

Wayne CC Family Division:

12-506491-NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CARLOS D. WALKER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-848

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed August 22, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Collier County; Christine Greider, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carbajal v. State, 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011); State v. King, 

426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); 

Mosely v. State, 688 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Desmond v. State, 576 So. 2d 743 

(Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Budd v. State, 477 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Foss v. State, 

834 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); McMillan v. State, 832 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 

2002); Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

BLACK, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Beth M. Halberstadt, as Chief Financial Officer of the American Bar Association Members/ State Street Collective Trust,certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of the American Bar Association Members/ State Street Collective Trust; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 7, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 79 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 79

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights 
                               amendment.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding any time 
limit contained in House Joint Resolution 208, 92d Congress, as agreed 
to in the Senate on March 22, 1972, the article of amendment

              

 proposed to the States in that joint resolution shall be valid to all 
intents and purposes as part of the United States Constitution whenever 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 13, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 79

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

    Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights 
                               amendment.
```
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00163-CR

CORY MARTIN COLVIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 115th District Court

Upshur County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16,601

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the court reporter’s record in this case indicates that such record contains 

“sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name 

of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX.R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). 

The court reporter’s record includes the names of persons who were minors at the time the offense 

was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing 

with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX.

R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(f) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(f). Therefore, because the court 

reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we order the Clerk of this Court or her appointee, in 

accordance with Rule 9.10(f), to seal the electronically filed reporter’s record, including all 

exhibits and DVDs, in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: April 14, 2015
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Randall K. Gausman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tut Systems Inc., on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tut Systems, Inc.



Date: May 1, 2003



By:

/s/    RANDALL K.
GAUSMANVice-President, Finance and Administration Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-14-00409-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF A.J.R., A CHILD 

 

On Appeal from the 223rd District Court 

Gray County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 37,116, Honorable Phil N. Vanderpool, Presiding 

 

April 16, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Through his attorney, Jaime Resendiz has filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss 

the appeal. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion pursuant to 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed 

the appeal at the party’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our 

mandate will issue forthwith. 

Per Curiam
<PAGE>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.7.2

                               JO-ANN STORES, INC.

                  LIST OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO ARE PARTIES TO
                   AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE REGISTRANT


The terms of the employment agreements for the following executive officers are
the same in all material respects except for the compensation amounts.


-        David Bolen
-        Brian Carney
-        Rosalind Thompson
-        Mike Edwards
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:

Vol. 77, No. 72, Friday, April 13, 2012, page 22290.

# Announced Time and Date of Meeting: 

Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

# Meeting Canceled: 

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

Dated: April 18, 2012.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-9666 Filed 4-18-12; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P