alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-10-00203- CR

Willie Wils on, App ellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 427 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -DC- 09- 2041 29, H ONO RAB LE JIM CO RONADO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant was convicted of drug possession, enhanc ed by sever al prior convictions, and sentenc ed to fiftee n y ear s im p ri s o n m en t

. Appellant’s appointed attorney has filed a brief concluding that the appe al is frivolous and without merit.

Counsel’s brief meets the requi r e me n ts of Anders v. Calif

ornia , 386 U.S. 738, 743-44 (1967), by prese nting a p ro fe s s i o n al evalua tion of the rec ord and demonstrating that there are no
arg uable g rounds to be advanc ed. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); Anders , 386 U.S. at 743-44; High v. State , 573 S.W .2d 807, 811-13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State , 516 S.W .2d 684, 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W .2d 137, 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant’s attorney sent appellant a copy of the brief and ad v i s ed h i m that he had the rig ht to examine the rec ord and file a pro se brief. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; Jack son v. State , 485 S.W .2d 553, 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972). No pro se br ief ha s been f iled.We have considere d the rec ord and counsel’ s b rief and ag ree that the appea l is

frivolous and without merit. We have revie wed the evidenc e prese nted and the proce dures that wer e observe d and find nothing in the rec ord that might arg uably support the appea l. We g rant counsel’s motion to wit hdrawand af firm the judg ment of convic tion. 1

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ David Pury ear , J ustice
Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Rose
Affir med Filed: Mar ch 23, 2011 Do Not Publish

No substitut e counsel will be appointed. Should appellant wish to seek further revie w of 1 his case by the court of criminal appea ls, he must either reta in an at t o rn ey t o fi l e a petition for discretionar

y revie w or file a pro se petition for discretionary revie w. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 68-79 (g overning proce eding s in the Texas Court of Criminal Appea ls)

. An y p et i t ion for discretionar

y revie w must be filed within thirty day s from the date of either this opinion or the date this Court overr

ules the last t i m ely motion for rehe aring filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. The petition must be filed with this Court, afte r which it will be forwa rded to the court of cr i m inal appea ls along with the rest of the filings in the cause
. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.3, 68.7. Any petition for discretionar

y revie w should comply with rules 68.4 and 68.5 of the rules of appellate proce dure. See Tex. R. App. P . 68.4, 68.5. 2
10-K


Exhibit
      23.1





Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The
      Board
      of Directors


The
      Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
      333-87450 and 333-140957) on Form S-8 of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
      of
      our reports dated March 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance
      sheets of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. and subsidiaries ("the Company")
      as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of
      income, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, cash flows and
      the consolidated financial statement schedule included as Item 15(a)(2) on
      the
      Company's Form 10-K for each of the years in the three-year period ended
      December 31, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report
      on Form 10-K of the Company. Our audit report on the consolidated financial
      statements refers to accounting changes as a result of the adoption of Statement
      of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), Share-Based
      Payment.






/s/
      KPMG
      LLP




McLean,
      Virginia


March
      28,
      2007







52
<Page>

                                   EXHIBIT 10(c)

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent
Public Accountants" in the Statement of Additional Information and use of our
report dated February 17, 2000 on the financial statements of Fortis Benefits
Insurance Company in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 (Form N-4 No.
333-43799) to the Registration Statement and related Prospectus and Statement
of Additional Information of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company for the
registration of flexible premium deferred combination variable and fixed
annuity contracts.

Minneapolis, Minnesota                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
April 17, 2002
Updated June 17, 2010

Formal Recommendation by the 

National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) 

to the National Organic Program (NOP)

Date: April 29, 2011

Subject: Sunset 2012 List on §205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for

use in organic crop production (g) As rodenticides

(2) Vitamin D3

Chair: Tracy Miedema

 

 

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action X

Guidance Statement 

Other 

Statement of the Recommendation (Including Recount of Vote): 

The NOSB recommends the relisting of Vitamin D3 as rodenticide on §205.601 

Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production by a vote of 14 

yes and 0 no.

 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with 

OFPA and NOP): 

The Crops Committee requested a new Technical Report for this material for 

this round of sunset. Following a discussion of the new TR and concerns about 

whether current regulation sufficiently prevents inadvertent harm to non-target 

species, the Crops Committee recommended that Vitamin D3 remain on the 

National List §205.601 as a rodenticide as there are very few alternative 

materials allowed for this use in organic crop production. Public comments 

were all in favor of the continued listing of Vitamin D3 for this purpose. 

Committee Vote:

Moved: John Foster Second: Steve DeMuri

Yes: 14 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recusal: 0
National Organic Standards Board 

Crops Committee 

2012 Sunset Proposed Recommendation 

Vitamin D3

April 29, 2011 

List: §205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production. 

(g) As rodenticides 

(2) Vitamin D3 

Committee Summary 

The Crops Committee requested a new Technical Report for this material for this round of 

sunset. Following a discussion of the new TR and concerns about whether current regulation 

sufficiently prevents inadvertent harm to non-target species, the Crops Committee is 

recommending that Vitamin D3 remain on the National List §205.601 as a rodenticide as there 

are very few alternative materials allowed for this use in organic crop production. 

Committee Recommendations 

The Crops Committee recommends the continued listing Vitamin D3 on the National List 

§205.601 (g) As rodenticides. 

Committee Vote 

Motion: to relist vitamin D3 on § 205.601. 

Motion: Tina Ellor Second: Colehour Bondera 

Yes: 5 No: 0 Absent: 2 Abstain: 0 Recuse: 0
391 A.2d 710

#### Liberty Hose & Supply, Inc. v. Three Rivers Enterprises, Inc., Appellant.

Submitted April 18,1978.

Arthur H. Stroyd, Jr., and Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, for appellant; Emil R. Pecori, Jr., and Pecori & Pecori, for appellee.

Order affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Amado MARTINEZ-FUERTE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jose JIMINEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raymond RANGEL GUILLEN and Fernando Medrano-Barragan, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 74-2462, 74-2680, 74-2714.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 20, 1976.

Jack Robinson, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), San Diego, Cal., for the U. S.

Charles M. Sevilla (argued), of Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, Cal., for appellant Martinez-Fuerte.

Frank M. Mangan (argued), of Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, Cal., for appellee Jiminez-Garcia.

Michael J. McCabe of Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., and E. J. Boone, San Diego, Cal., for appellees Rangel Guillen and Medrano-Barragan.

ORDER

Before DUNIWAY and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and WEIGEL, District Judge.

Pursuant to the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States in *United States v. Martinez-Fuerte et*al., 1976, -U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 48 L.Ed.2d-, it is ordered:

1. In No. 74r-2462, the conviction of the appellant Martinez-Fuerte is affirmed.

2. In No. 74-2680, the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

3. In No. 74-2714, the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00838-CR

FINLEY WRIGHT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 174th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1334182).

TO THE 174TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 12th day of February 2015, the case upon appeal to 

revise or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these 

words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed 

by the trial court on August 27, 2013. After submitting the 

case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s 

judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the 

Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered February 12, 2015.
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Higley.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

July 3, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
10-K

|                                      |   | STATE OF            |   |                                |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                                      |   |  INCORPORATION |   | RELATIONSHIP                        |   |
|                                      |   |                |   |                                |   |
| BNA      Holdings, Inc.              |   | Delaware       |   | 100% Owned      by Registrant  |   |
|                                      |   |                |   |                                |   |
| BNA      International, Inc.              |   | Delaware       |   | 100% Owned      by Registrant  |   |
|                                      |   |                |   |                                |   |
| BNA      Washington, Inc.                 |   | Delaware       |   | 100% Owned      by Registrant  |   |
|                                      |   |                |   |                                |   |
| BNA      Subsidiaries, LLC                |   | Delaware       |   | 100% Owned by      Registrant  |   |
|                                      |   |                |   |                                |   |
| The      McArdle Printing Co., Inc.  |   | Delaware       |   | 100% Owned      by Registrant  |   |
|                                      |   |                |   |                                |   |
| STF      Services Corporation        |   | New      York  |   | 100% Owned      by Registrant  |   |
|                                      |   |                |   |                                |   |
| Tax      Management, Inc.       |   | Delaware       |   | 100% Owned      byRegistrant   |

----
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas
NO. 01

- 14

- 00024

- CR
GREGORY G. TOBIAS , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the 208 th District Court of Harris County

.

(Tr. Ct. No. 1392449 ). The cause heard today by the Court is an appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on November 19 , 2013

. After inspecting the record of the court below, the Court holds that it lacks subject

- matter jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, the Court dismisses the appeal.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance. Judgment render ed March 17 , 201 5

. Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Jennings , Higley, and Huddle

.
Marketing and Regulatory Programs – Agricultural Marketing Service – Specialty Crops Program – Specialty Crops Inspection Division 1 of 1

 Inspection Aid No. 25

 Canned Lima Beans - Guide for Scoring Color July 2016

Thin Seeded Type – Thick Seeded Baby Potato Type

A

Green 

% By

Count

White Beans – Percent By Count

0 1 2 3 4-5 6-10 11-15 16-25 26-35 36-50 51-65 66-80 81-100

100 35

99 35 34

98 35 34 33

97 34 33 32 32

96 34 33 31 31 30

95 34 33 31 31 30

94 33 32 31 31 30 30

92-93 33 32 31 30 30 30

90-91 32 32 30 30 30 29

B 1

85-89 31 31 30 30 29 29 29

75-84 31 31 30 30 29 29 29 29

65-74 31 30 30 30 29 29 29 29 28

50-64 30 30 30 30 29 29 29 29 28 27

C 1

35-49 28 28 28 28 28 28 27 27 27 27 26

20-34 28 28 28 28 28 27 27 27 26 26 26 26

0-19 27 27 27 27 27 27 26 26 26 26 26 26 26

Thick Seeded Type

 

1

Limiting Rule

A

Green 

% By 

Count

White Beans – Percent By Count

0 1 2 3 4-5 6-10 11-15 16-25 26-35 36-50 51-65 66-80 81-100

100 35

99 35 34

98 35 34 33 33

97 34 33 32 32

96 34 33 32 32

95 34 33 32 32

94 33 32 32 32

92-93 33 32 32 32 31 30

90-91 33 32 32 32 31 30

B 1

85-89 31 31 31 31 30 30 30

75-84 31 31 31 30 30 30 29 29

65-74 31 30 30 30 30 29 29 29 28

50-64 30 30 30 30 29 29 29 29 28 27

C 1

35-49 28 28 28 28 28 28 27 27 27 27 26

20-34 28 28 28 28 28 27 27 27 26 26 26 26

0-19 27 27 27 27 27 27 26 26 26 26 26 26 26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000015511
<NAME> THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      548<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                        66<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,170<F1>
<PP&E>                                          25,946
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,910<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,194<F1>
<BONDS>                                          4,726
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,910<F1>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,189
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    403
<INCOME-TAX>                                       151
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                252
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       252
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>RESTATEMENT REFLECTED HEREIN IS THE RESULT OF RECLASSIFICATIONS TO PRIOR
PERIODS' FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO CONFORM TO THE CURRENT PERIOD PRESENTATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
SERVED: JUNE 14, 2012 

--------------~----------

IN THE MATTER OF 

WESTOVER CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. F AA-2012 - 0200 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

?[!;z 3: 00 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on November 29 and 30, 2012, inclusive, in the Courtroom #601 Alfred A. Arraj 

United States Courthouse, 90119th Street, 2nd Floor, Denver CO. 80294. Hearings 

will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties shall 

vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00p.m. each day. 

-cllafdC. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 
SE~VICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 fudependence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Howard Bittman, Respondent's Counsel 

P.O. Box 4370 

113 Spruce Street 

Boulder, CO 80306 

TEL: 303-444-8349 

FAX: 303-444-1089 

Courtney Adolph, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, A WP-7.4 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7128 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 .... 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant/Paralegal 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0200 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use· the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
#### Robert F. COCHRANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 4531.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

May 9, 1980.

Sue Ellen Tatter, Asst. Public Defender, Brian Shortell, Public Defender, Anchorage, for appellant.

William L. Mackey, Dist. Atty., Kodiak, Peter Michalski, Asst. Atty. Gen., Anchorage, Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ., and DIMOND, Senior Justice.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Robert F. Cochrane was convicted by a jury of two counts of rape1 and two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon.2 He *62was given concurrent sentences of twelve years imprisonment for each count of rape and five years imprisonment for each count of assault.

On appeal, Cochrane makes several claims of error:

> 1. Trial court’s exclusion of evidence regarding Mrs. Cochrane’s extramarital relationship;

> 2. Trial court’s exclusion of Mrs. Coch-rane’s testimony regarding Cochrane’s expression of amazement upon learning of the rape charges;

> 3. Trial court’s failure to order psychiatric examinations of the complaining witnesses;

> 4. Prosecutor’s failure to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury;

> 5. Evidence before grand jury was insufficient to sustain the indictment for assault with a dangerous weapon.

We believe that there is no merit to these claims and affirm Cochrane’s conviction.

Cochrane additionally appeals his sentence on the ground that it is excessive. Our review of the record convinces us that the sentence is not clearly mistaken.3*McClain v. State,*519 P.2d 811, 813-14 (Alaska 1974).

The judgment of the superior court is AFFIRMED.

1

. AS 11.15.120 provides:

> *Rape.*A person who (1) has carnal knowledge of a female person, forcibly and against her will, or (2) being 16 years of age, carnally knows and abuses a female person under 16 years of age, with her consent, is guilty of rape.

(Repealed effective January 1, 1980 by ch. 166, § 21, SLA 1978).

2

. AS 11.15.220 provides:

> *Assault with dangerous weapon. A*person armed with a dangerous weapon, who assaults another with the weapon, is punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary for not more than 10 years nor less than six months, or by imprisonment in jail for not more than one year nor less than one month, or by a fine of not more than $1,000 nor less than $100.

(Repealed effective January 1, 1980 by ch. 166, § 21, SLA 1978).

3

. The victims, two young women, were raped at gun point, threatened, and subjected to humiliating treatment by the defendant. In addition to the particular facts of this case, the trial court considered a psychiatric evaluation of the defendant, the sentencing criteria enunciated in *State v. Chaney,*477 P.2d 441 (Alaska 1970), and numerous other rape cases and the sentences imposed therein.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Copano Energy, L.L.C. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2005, I, John R. Eckel, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|May 16, 2005 | /s/JOHN R. ECKEL, JR.                                               
|------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|             | John R. Eckel, Jr. Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks