alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000015511
<NAME>  THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      548<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                        52<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,359<F1>
<PP&E>                                          24,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,746<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,036<F1>
<BONDS>                                          5,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,746<F1>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,147
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    458
<INCOME-TAX>                                       180
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                278
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       278
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>RESTATEMENT REFLECTED HEREIN IS THE RESULT OF RECLASSIFICATIONS TO PRIOR
PERIODS' FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO CONFORM TO THE CURRENT PERIOD PRESENTATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the amended report of Entrx Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Peter L. Hauser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Brian D. Niebur, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  i.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andii.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Peter L. Hauser Peter L. Hauser
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2005 /s/ Brian D. Niebur Brian D. Niebur
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

KHALIL R. WHITE,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 20 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
# C_2012326EN.01020101.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

PROTOCOL (No 23)

ON EXTERNAL RELATIONS OF THE MEMBER STATES WITH REGARD TO THE CROSSING OF EXTERNAL BORDERS

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the need of the Member States to ensure effective controls at their external borders, in cooperation with third countries where appropriate,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

The provisions on the measures on the crossing of external borders included in Article 77(2)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union shall be without prejudice to the competence of Member States to negotiate or conclude agreements with third countries as long as they respect Union law and other relevant international agreements.

---
Martha s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 2, 2014

No. 04-14-00265-CV

John DONOHUE,

Appellant

v.

Martha DONOHUE,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CI19573

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This court has issued a show cause order requiring appellant to establish this court’s 

jurisdiction. Pursuant to that order, all deadlines have been stayed pending further order of this 

court. Accordingly, we DENY AS MOOT the reporter’s request for an extension of time to file 

the record.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,220
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     78,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,072
<PP&E>                                          42,656
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,172
<BONDS>                                         60,946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,964    
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,734
<SALES>                                        236,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               236,998
<CGS>                                          178,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,553)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,527
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (40,080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (40,080)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (13.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (13.07)
        

</TABLE>
CONS. OF INDEP. AUDITORS', DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLP


 








Exhibit 10(i)


 



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT


 



To the Board of Directors of




C.M. Life Insurance Company


 



We consent to the use in this Post Effective Amendment No. 12 to Registration Statement No. 33-45122 on Form N-4 of our report dated February 15, 2002 for the Panorama
Plus Separate Account and of our report dated March 1, 2002 on C.M. Life Insurance Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs referring to the use of statutory accounting practices and the change of
certain accounting practices as a result of the State of Connecticut Insurance Department’s adoption of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual – Version effective
January 1, 2001, all of which practices differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America), appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference
to us under the heading “Experts” in such Statement of Additional Information.


 



DELOITTE
& TOUCHE 
LLP


 



Hartford, Connecticut




April 25, 2002
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0754

_____________________________

EDDIE LEE LATSON, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

January 8, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROWE and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine R. Dixon, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1253 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1253

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 13507 Van Nuys Boulevard in Pacoima, California, as the ``Ritchie 
                     Valens Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RITCHIE VALENS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 13507 Van Nuys Boulevard in Pacoima, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Ritchie Valens Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ritchie 
Valens Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
II 

Calendar No. 296 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1253 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 7, 2019 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 13507 Van Nuys Boulevard in Pacoima, California, as the ‘‘Ritchie Valens Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RITCHIE VALENS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 13507 Van Nuys Boulevard in 

6 Pacoima, California, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Ritchie Valens Post Office Building’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1253 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ritchie Valens Post 

5 Office Building’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 296 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1253 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. in Pacoima, California, as the ‘‘Ritchie Valens al Service located at 13507 Van Nuys Boulevard 

NOVEMBER 7, 2019 

Reported without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. 

Under Contract No. N69450-12-C-0754 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ASBCA No. 62158 

Douglas L. Patin, Esq. 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP 

Washington, DC 

Craig D. Jensen, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Matthew D. Bordelon, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On August 27, 2019, appellant filed a Notice of Appeal predicated upon the 

"deemed denial" of its June 13, 2019 "Termination for Convenience claim and request 

for a final decision to the Contracting Officer [CO]." This was based upon the CO's failure 

to issue a final decision within 60 days or to indicate when this would be done. The appeal 

was docketed as ASBCA No. 62158. By separate correspondence of August 27, 2019, 

Satterfield & Pontikes then notified the Board that it had located a copy of the CO's 

response to the claim, and sought to withdraw the appeal while "reserv[ing] its rights to 

refile a Notice of Appeal at a later date." The Board treats this as a motion to dismiss the 

appeal without prejudice. 

The government was given the opportunity to respond, and initially indicated that 

it would agree to dismissal only if it were done with prejudice. Following further 

discussion, the parties on September 30, 2019, agreed to dismissal of the appeal without 

prejudice upon these terms: 

Appellant dismisses without prejudice its deemed denial 

appeal of August 27, 2019. Appellant will not seek to 

reinstate this "deemed denial" appeal filed August 27, 2019[], 

or seek to file any other deemed denial "relating back" to that 

August 27, 2019 Notice of Appeal. This dismissal without 

prejudice does not affect Appellant's right to appeal a 

contracting officer's final decision regarding Appellant's 

termination for convenience claim dated June 13, 2019, or a 

subsequent, independent deemed denial appeal of that claim. 
We regard this as a joint motion to dismiss ASBCA No. 62158 without prejudice. 

The motion is granted in accordance with Board Rule 18(b ), with the stipulation that 

appellant is not foreclosed from lodging a timely appeal of its June 13, 2019 claim under 

the circumstances stated above. 

Dated: October 2, 2019 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62158, Appeal of Satterfield & Pontikes 

Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

DARIN W. HOFFMAN,

 Petitioner

 v.

SUPERINTENDENT GERALD R.

ROZUM, STATE CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTE AT SOMERSET,

PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 502 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
**Exhibit32.1**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

I, William L. Bridgford, Chairman of the Board ofBridgford Foods Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)                  theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended November 3,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and

(2)                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: February 1, 2007 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    | /s/    WILLIAM  L. BRIDGFORD       |
| ** **              | **William  L. Bridgford,** |
| ** **              | **Chairman  of the Board** |
| ** **              | **(Principal  Executive Officer)** |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1322 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1322

   To require a report on the effects of climate change on the Coast 
                     Guard, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 22, 2019

  Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York (for himself and Mr. Brown of 
  Maryland) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require a report on the effects of climate change on the Coast 
                     Guard, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORT ON EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON COAST GUARD.

    (a) In General.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall submit 
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation of the Senate a report on vulnerabilities of Coast Guard 
installations and requirements resulting from climate change over the 
next 20 years.
    (b) Elements.--The report under subsection (a) shall include the 
following:
            (1) A list of the ten most vulnerable Coast Guard 
        installations based on the effects of climate change, including 
        rising sea tides, increased flooding, drought, desertification, 
        wildfires, thawing permafrost, or any other categories the 
        Commandant determines necessary.
            (2) An overview of mitigations that may be necessary to 
        ensure the continued operational viability and to increase the 
        resiliency of such vulnerable installations and the cost of 
        such mitigations.
            (3) A discussion of the climate-change-related effects on 
        the Coast Guard, including the increase in the frequency of 
        humanitarian assistance and disaster relief missions and the 
        campaign plans, contingency plans, and operational posture of 
        the Coast Guard.
            (4) An overview of mitigations that may be necessary to 
        ensure mission resiliency and the cost of such mitigations.
    (c) Form.--The report required under subsection (a) shall be 
submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.
                                 <all>
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00315

- CR

The State of Texas v. Juan Manuel Perez
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 21

- 03442

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 25 , 2022
<PAGE>
Exhibit 11

          Statement of computation of earnings per share.
     236
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Statements re: Computation of Earnings Per Share
Brenton Banks, Inc.

December 31,                            1999           1998           1997

<S>                             <C>            <C>            <C>

Basic EPS Computation
   Numerator:
     Net income                 $ 16,560,117   $ 20,350,921   $ 18,010,107

   Denominator:
     Average common shares
       Outstanding                20,498,366     20,853,194     21,180,706

   Basic EPS                    $       0.81   $       0.98   $       0.85

Diluted EPS Computation
   Numerator:
     Net income                 $ 16,560,117   $ 20,350,921   $ 18,010,107

   Denominator:
     Average common shares
       Outstanding                20,498,366     20,853,194     21,180,706
     Average stock options           302,913        428,511        343,534
     Average long-term stock
       compensation plan                 ---            ---        169,586

                                  20,801,279     21,281,705     21,693,826

   Diluted EPS                  $       0.80   $       0.96   $       0.83

<FN>
Note:  Amounts are restated for the 2-for-1 stock split effective
       February 1998 and the 10 percent common stock dividends
       effective in 1999 and 1998.
</TABLE>
     237
### SERVE D FEBRUAR

Y 28 , 201 1 •'I'nRTMENTO F

• N-'^PORTATIO N U.S . DEPARTMEN

T O F TRANSPORTATIO

N r! ' i 0PERATI0M

3 OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , DC :*ni ! fP B 7 3 0 2:U 3 I N TH E MATTE RO F 

### RUSHMOR E HELICOPTERS , INC . FA A DOCKE

T NO . CP10GL000 2 (Civil Penalt

y Action ) FA A No . FAA-2010-002 3 HEARIN G NOTIC E NOTICE I S HEREB Y GIVE N tha t testimon y an devidenc e wil l b e hear

dandconsidere d o n Apri l 27 , 2 8 an d29,2011 , inclusive , in th e Conferenc e Room , B16 , Unite dState s Courthouse , 51 5 Ninth Street , Roo m244 , Rapi dCity , S D 57701 . Hearing s wil l commenc e a

t 9:00 a.m . an

dconclud e a t 4:3 0 p.m . each day . Th

e partie s shouldvacat

e th e courthous e o n o

r befor e 5:0 0 p.m . each day . S O ORDERED .

U.S . Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen

t - Servic e Lis t1 - i : FA A Docket No . CP10GL000 2 ^ (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) SERVHlfipS T ORlGi^J^y#^)i ^ CiOP Y ^i Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n >;. | il * :'•• • 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. Washington , D C 2059 1 ^ . Attention : Hearin g Docket Cle^k , ^(|M|| | s Wilbu r Wrigh t Buil4ii%,|^^^»1000 ^ ONE^iaSiP

Y Michae l Jacob , Responden

t Presiden t o r CE O Rushmor e Helicopters , Inc . 24564 Highwa

y 16/38 5 Custer , S D 5773 0 Chri s G . Zurales , Complainant' s Grea t Lake s Region , AGL- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 2300 Eas t Devon Avenu e De s Plaines , I

L 60018-469 6 TEL : 847-294-771 3 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar

dC . Goodwfn* . Offic e of Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen

t of Transportatio n 120 0 New Jersey Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g GroundFloor , Roon l E12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r

- ^ 202-366-512 1 Lega

l Assisten t FAX:~ ^ 202-366-753 6 rf;ij.,»?*J

veLa w Judg e

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail. Fo

r servic e Federa l Aviatio n Administration

, 60 0 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attentio

n courier

, us e th e follomo g address : & , Wilbu r Wrigh t Buil|l%--Suit

e Cleric , AGC-430 .