alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association
Members/State Street Collective Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Beth M. Halberstadt, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                          /s/ Beth M. Halberstadt
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Beth M. Halberstadt
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          August 11, 2006
| 1)          | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)          | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      November 15, 2010       | By:    | /s/ J.      Jeremy Barbera                        |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                              |   | J.      Jeremy Barbera                                 |   |
|                                                              |   | Chairman      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                                              |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                     |   |

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 110 

To provide an exception to certain mandatory minimum sentence requirements 

for a person employed outside the United States by a Federal agency, 

who uses, carries, or possesses the firearm during and in relation to 

a crime of violence committed while on-duty with a firearm required 

to be carried while on-duty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide an exception to certain mandatory minimum sentence requirements for a person employed outside the 

United States by a Federal agency, who uses, carries, 

or possesses the firearm during and in relation to a 

crime of violence committed while on-duty with a firearm 

required to be carried while on-duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 110 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO CERTAIN MANDATORY MIN2 IMUM SENTENCING REQUIREMENTS FOR 

3 PERSON EMPLOYED OUTSIDE THE UNITED 

4 STATES BY A FEDERAL AGENCY, WHO USES, 

5 CARRIES, OR POSSESSES A FIREARM DURING 

6 AND IN RELATION TO A CRIME OF VIOLENCE 

7 COMMITTED WHILE ON-DUTY WITH A FIRE8 ARM REQUIRED TO BE CARRIED WHILE ON9 DUTY. 

10 Section 3261 of title 18, United States Code, is 

11 amended by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(e) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, 

13 if the offense is a violation of section 924(c)(1) of this 

14 title, the minimum sentencing requirements of section 

15 924(c)(1)(A) of this title shall not apply if— 

16 ‘‘(1) the person committed a crime of violence 

17 during and in relation to the offense; 

18 ‘‘(2) an agency of the United States required 

19 the person to carry a firearm while on-duty; and 

20 ‘‘(3) at the time the person used, carried, or 

21 possessed the firearm, the person was employed out22 side the United States by the agency, and was on23 duty.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Pg. 1 of 1

Characteristic Schedule CL

Marcho Farms 

Premium Lamb

Live Requirements

Domestic or Non-Domestic Lamb Domestic

Dressed Weight 60 to 80 lbs.

Carcass Requirements

Excellent Condition X

Quality Factors

U.S. Prime X X

U.S. Choice X X

Yield Grade Factors

U.S. Yield 1 or 2 X

U.S. Yield 3.9 or Lower X

USDA Information 

Initial Release Date Nov-89

Revision Date Jul-92

USDA Certified X X

USDA Process Verified X

X-indicates program requirement

Certified Lamb Programs
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Monthly Inventory Report 

As of November 30, 2022 

(Million Units Except as Noted) 

CCC Commodity 

Unit of 

Measure 

Outstanding

Under Loan 

CY 2021 

Outstanding

Under Loan 

CY 2022 

CCC-Owned 

Inventory

(Actual Units) 

Butter Pounds - - -

Cheese Pounds - - -

Nonfat Dry Milk Pounds - - -

Barley Bushels 0.0 0.5 0.0 

Corn Bushels 3.6 164.4 0.0 

Oats Bushels 0.1 0.2 0.0 

Sorghum Cwt. 0.0 0.1 0.0 

Soybeans Bushels 0.5 41.9 0.0 

Wheat Bushels 0.2 8.2 0.0 

Rice Cwt. 0.3 13.1 0.0 

Refined Sugar Pounds 110.0 488.0 0.0 

 In-process Beet Pounds 0.0 385.0 0.0 

Raw Cane Sugar Pounds 0.0 544.0 0.0 

 In-process Cane Pounds - - -

Honey Pounds 0.4 0.0 0.0 

Peanuts 

Tons (not 

millions) 1,550.0 1,651,000.0 0.0 

Canola Seed* Cwt. 0.0 143.0 0.0 

Crambe* Cwt. - - -

Flaxseed* Cwt. 0.0 5.0 0.0 

Mustard Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Rapeseed* Cwt. - - -

Safflower Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Sesame Seed* Cwt. - - -

Sunflower Seed (Oil)* Cwt. 24.0 17.0 0.0 

Sunflower Seed (Other)* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Dry Peas* Cwt. 36.0 58.0 0.0 

Lentils* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Chickpeas* Cwt. 6.0 18.0 0.0 

Upland Cotton 

1,000 

Running 

Bales 6.7 2,762.5 0.0 

ELS Cotton 

1,000 

Running 

Bales 0.4 92.4 0 
Notes: 

 *Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units. 

 CCC acquired 2021 Crop Year Upland (if not specified) and ELS cotton because of the following 

months' forfeited Marketing Assistance Loans: 

o 3 bales from July, 20 bales from August, 15 bales from September and 33 bales from 

October 2022. 

o Invitations sold all 3 bales in August, 20 bales in September, 15 bales in October and 33 

bales in November 2022. 

o In total, there were 0 bales of cotton in inventory as of November 30, 2022. 

Report Completed December 21, 2022.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ZACHERY LAMAR THREATS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 135 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
1

United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

Egg Producer Organizations Certified to Nominate Egg Board Members

And Alternates Under the Egg Research and Promotion Order

AREA III—West States – 6 Members and 6 Alternates

Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, 

Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, 

Washington, and Wyoming)

Kevin Stiles, Executive Director

Iowa Egg Council

8515 Douglas Avenue, Suite 9

Urbandale, Iowa 50322-2924

(515) 727-4701 

(515) 727-4707

KevinS@IowaEgg.org

Dr. Scott Beyer, Executive Secretary

Kansas Poultry Association

Kansas State University

Dept. of Animal Sciences

Room 130, Call Hall

Manhattan, Kansas 66506-1600

(785) 532-1201

(785) 532-5681 Fax

sbeyer@ksu.edu

Kevin Stiles, Executive Director

Chicken & Egg Association of Minnesota

Midwest Poultry Federation, Inc

8515 Douglas Avenue, Suite 9

Urbandale, Iowa 50322-2924

(515) 727-4701 

(515) 727-4707

Kevins@mnchicken.org
2

Debra Murdock

Executive Director/CA Egg Industry Association (CEIA)

Pacific Egg and Poultry Association (PEPA)

1521 “I” Street

Sacramento, California 95814

(916) 441-0801 PEPA

(916) 492-7067 CEIA

(916) 446-1063 Fax (CEIA)

dmurdock@cgfa.org
Exhibit 10(a)  


April 19, 2002 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life Insurance Company

2801 Highway 201 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 


Directors:



        We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 4 to
the registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-81553) filed by Protective Life Insurance Company and Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 













Sincerely,

SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

By: /s/  DAVID S. GOLDSTEIN     








David S. Goldstein
Quality Assurance and 

Compliance Division

Grain Inspection Advisory Committee Meeting

September 2018

Karen Guagliardo, Director
Outline

• Overview

• Reviews/Audits

• Quality Management Program

• Investigations

• Exceptions Programs

• Boundary Review

• Delegation Documents
Overview
Overview

• Audit FGIS Operations

• Authorize Official Service Providers

• Investigate Violations

• Register Exporters

• Manage Quality Program

• Analyze Quality Data
Reviews/Audits

• Synopsis

• Scores

• Gold Standard Less than 

90 percent

Awarded 

Gold 

Standard

90 % or 

Above

QMP Review Scores
Quality Management Program

• History

• Continuous Improvement

• Pilot – Complete

• Standard – Complete

• Internal Audit Guidance

• Training

• Audit Cycle

• New Handbook
Investigations

Reporting Violations of the USGSA or AMA

Official personnel are required to report any violations 

of statutes, policies, procedures or instructions. 

Including:

• program activities

• bribes 

• assaults 

• misconduct

HOTLINE

800-998-3447 
Exceptions Programs
Boundary Review

National Grain & Feed Association recommended FGIS 

review the current boundaries for designated agencies. 

Including:

• Number of facilities using official system

• Volume of grain in the official system

• Estimate of unofficial volume

• Number of carriers in the official system

• Other services provided 

• Fees of services in the official system 
86
76
58
44

Delegation Documents
NO. 12-14-00015-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: §

MAX B. HANSON, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

RELATOR §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Max B. Hanson filed this original mandamus proceeding complaining of the trial court’s 

order setting aside the mediated settlement agreement (MSA) between Max and his wife, Marie, 

in their divorce proceeding. On February 27, 2015, this court conditionally granted Max’s 

petition and directed Respondent to (1) vacate his November 13, 2013 order setting aside the 

MSA and (2) render judgment on the MSA pursuant to Family Code Section 6.602. Respondent 

has now complied with this court’s opinion and order, rendering this proceeding moot. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the Hanson’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

Opinion delivered April 8, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 8, 2015

NO. 12-14-00015-CV

IN RE: MAX B. HANSON,

Relator

v.

HON. ROBERT K. INSELMANN, JR.,

Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by 

MAX B. HANSON, who is the relator in Cause No. DV-00731-12-01, pending on the docket of 

the County Court at Law #1 of Angelina County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus 

having been filed herein on January 15, 2014, and the same having been duly considered, 

because it is the opinion of this Court that this original proceeding should be dismissed as moot, 

it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of 

mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 11

          Statement of computation of earnings per share.
     242
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Statements re: Computation of Earnings Per Share
Brenton Banks, Inc.
<CAPTION>
December 31,                          1996         1995         1994

<S>                               <C>          <C>          <C>
Net income                        $14,015,430  $10,407,354  $10,107,387

Average common shares outstanding   8,223,543    8,440,493    8,679,515

Average shares under long-term
  stock compensation plan              88,877       87,660       67,538

Average common equivalent
  shares outstanding                8,312,420    8,528,153    8,747,053

Earnings per share                $      1.69         1.22         1.15
</TABLE>

Note:  Amounts are restated to reflect the 10% common stock dividend
       effective in 1996.
     243
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Johnson, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Kepner, J.), rendered August 27, 1987, convicting him of leaving the scene of an accident (three counts), criminal mischief in the third degree (three counts), unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle, criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, attempted grand larceny in the second degree (two counts), possession of burglar’s tools, and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial (Santagata, J.), after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain statements made by the defendant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence presented to the hearing court clearly demonstrated that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant *(see,*CPL 140.10 [1] [b]). The arresting officer was *695provided with factual information concerning the defendant’s description and the direction of his flight from the scene of the crime. The defendant was found hiding under a woodpile behind a private residence on a street near the crime scene. Moreover, he matched the general description of one of the perpetrators *(see, People v Cumberbatch,*171 AD2d 671). The description of the defendant, together with his location near the crime scene, and his hiding under a woodpile constituted "facts and circumstances which, viewed together” *(People v Rivera,*166 AD2d 678, 679, quoting *People v Dawkins,*163 AD2d 322) could have led the arresting officer to reasonably conclude that the defendant perpetrated the crimes described over police radio broadcasts *(see, People v Rivera, supra; People v Dawkins, supra).*

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Regional Forester, Pacific Southwest Region, hereby delegates to the Forest Supervisor, Eldorado National Forest, authority to grant a Forest Road and Trail Act easement to El Dorado County for the Rubicon Trail.

# DATES:

April 19, 2012.

# ADDRESSES:

USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, 1323 Club Drive, Vallejo, CA 94592.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ramiro Villalvazo, Director, Public Services, (707) 562-8856.

Randy Moore,

Regional Forester.

[FR Doc. 2012-9945 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
      Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
      of
      Directors of the Company, certifies that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      David
      Lichtenstein


David
      Lichtenstein


Chairman,
      President, and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


August
      11, 2005
[Use Letterhead of Organization Providing the Match]

LETTER OF VERIFICATION FOR MATCHING FUNDS

[Application Authorized Organizational Representative] 

[Applicant Organization Address]

Dear [Application Authorized Organizational Representative]: 

We commit to providing the following matching funds to the [Current Year] [Grant Program] application: [Project title]

1. Cash in the total amount of $XXX, which we will provide during the grant period September 30, [insert year begins] through September 29, [insert year project will terminate].  

a. Funds will be used for [provide particular item(s) corresponding to the budget narrative or describe how the applicant will otherwise use the funds].  

b. We will provide the following amounts per year: 

* Applicable depending on the program.  

2. In-kind contributions in the total amount of $XXX, will be contributed as follows: 

a. Salaries and wages of staff time for the following employees: 

*Applicable depending on the program.

b. The following items/activities with a total fair market value of $XXX: 

* Applicable depending on the program. 

Sincerely,

[Signature of Matching Organization Representative]

[Printed Name of Matching Organization Representative]

[Title]

[Email, address and phone number if not already included on letterhead.]
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0187.GREGHOLLAND et al. v.GUARANTYSOLUTIONSRECOVERY

FUND I, L.P. et al.

In this garnishment action, the trial court entered an order requiring the

Defendant Greg Holland and Third Party Teri Holland to appear for depositions. In

that same order, the trial court denied Defendant Greg Holland’s claim and Third

PartyTeri Holland’s traverse “at present,” and stayed the garnishment action pending

the outcome of motionsin the underlying judgment case. The Hollandsthen filed this

application for discretionary appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Generally, a party must follow the discretionary appeal procedure to appeal an

order in a garnishment case. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (4). However, this case is still

pending below. Because the order that the Hollands wish to appeal is not a final

judgment, they were required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure set

forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 261 Ga.

587, 588-589 (1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991). Although the Hollands did file a

discretionary application pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35, which governs discretionary

appeal procedures, that does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an

interlocutory order fromcomplying with the additionalrequirements of OCGA § 5-6-

34 (b), including obtaining a certificate of immediate review. See Bailey v. Bailey,

266 Ga. 832, 832-833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996). 

The Hollands’ failure to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure

deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this discretionary application, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

February 08, 2021
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/08/2021
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHEL CHATMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-484

[July 29, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Mindy F. Solomon, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

16002652CF10A.

Hilliard E. Moldof of Hillard E. Moldof, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
STATE OF TEM®^!^^^ £? (Lf^ REMALTY F*/" "TM"TM-- 3 ^ — TM"EOWES

o/iu/^U19 PKUVATE U§f|j» \'A~M^MmW$ °°06557458 MAR 13 2015

FEIST, HERBERT HERMAN ^m^o^M^ maiued from ?ip codf trtoi

A^PUCA^N APPLICATION mR^,T^^I^^^0TI0N FOR WRIT OF HABEj||J0gpUS DIRECTLYF0RTO LEAVET^ COURT...". RLE

Abel Acosta, Clerk

HERBERT HERMAN FEIST

JEFFERSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY #

18805

P. O. BOX 26007 fwd

BEAUMONT, TX 77720

IEBN3B 77720 111'•i*»11 *•11»JI'*11' I'••IH i*-'I**1111' 111 •1•1J J*1*1' 11 •111 n*1
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #14-2004 L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





By:
/s/ Matthew A. JonesName:
Matthew A. JonesTitle:
Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
August 13, 2009