alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dean L. Cash, Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of ATEL
Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 17, 2007



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Dean L. Cash                                                  
|Dean L. Cash President and Chief Executive Officer of Managing Member

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DAVID LIBRACE,

Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM CHESTER COLE, 

DECEASED, AND PATRICIA 

COLE, AND JOHN C. COLE,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1000

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 13, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

David Librace, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

ROWE, MARSTILLER, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Charles Gray, Appellant, v New York State Board of Parole et al., Respondents.

—Mahoney, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered January 30, 1991 in Ulster County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner was released from Wallkill Correctional Facility in Ulster County on parole supervision on December 22, 1989. On February 24, 1990, petitioner was arrested by the City of Kingston Police Department and charged with first degree rape, two counts of first degree sodomy and endangering the welfare of a child, all the result of the sexual assault of his 14-year-old stepdaughter. These charges were ultimately dismissed. On February 28, 1990, the Division of Parole issued a parole violation warrant and charged petitioner with having sexual contact with his stepdaughter as well as forcible sexual intercourse with her, and subjecting her to oral sexual contact. A preliminary parole revocation hearing was held on March 15, 1990 and probable cause was found to believe that petitioner had violated the conditions of his parole. After a final parole revocation hearing, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) recommended that petitioner’s parole be revoked and that petitioner be returned to prison "until maximum expiration of sentence”. A Parole Board member sustained the ALJ’s findings and revoked petitioner’s parole. Petitioner then apparently filed an administrative notice of appeal *(see,*9 NYCRR part 8006) and duly perfected his administrative appeal on December 31, 1990. Approximately four months prior to the perfection of his administrative *875appeal, petitioner sought judicial review of his parole revocation by way of this habeas corpus proceeding. Supreme Court denied the application and this appeal followed.

We affirm. Petitioner must first pursue the administrative remedies available to him pursuant to 9 NYCRR part 8006. The petition must be dismissed because it is undisputed that petitioner "failed to pursue an available administrative appeal to redress the claimed errors in the parole revocation process” *(Matter of Trimaldi v Superintendent of Washington Correctional Facility,*169 AD2d 960, 961). We find unavailing petitioner’s argument that *People ex rel. Robertson v New York State Div. of Parole*(67 NY2d 197) requires a different result. In that case, the Court of Appeals specifically left open the question of whether the writ is appropriate in cases where, as here, the alleged errors may be properly addressed through the administrative appeal process and resort thereto will not prove fruitless *(supra,*at 202, n 4; *see, People ex rel. Walker v New York State Bd. of Parole,*98 AD2d 33).

Casey, Weiss, Yesawich Jr. and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, by Robert Abrams, as Attorney-General, Respondent, v Apple Health and Sports Clubs, Ltd., Inc., et al., Appellants.

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.) entered March 5, 1991, which, *inter alia,*restrained respondents from transferring, withdrawing or otherwise disposing of any money in any bank account in the name of Apple Health and Sports Clubs, Ltd., Inc. ("Apple”) and Thurcon Properties, Ltd. ("Thurcon”) and directed respondents to file a bond in the amount of $500,000, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

It is alleged that the respondents operated four health clubs, now defunct, in violation of General Business Law § 622-a, in that no bond, irrevocable letter of credit, or certificate of deposit was filed with the Attorney-General.

In this special proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 63 (12), the Attorney-General seeks *inter alia,*to enjoin respondents from violating the law and from entering into new membership contracts and renewing existing membership contracts.

While respondents maintain that a preliminary injunction was not warranted, the record clearly demonstrates petitioner’s likelihood of success on the merits, and a balancing of the equities in petitioner’s favor. *(See, Albini v Solork Assocs.,*37 AD2d 835.) Moreover, since the Legislature authorizes injunctive relief for fraudulent and illegal conduct such as that *439which occurred here, proof of irreparable injury is unnecessary. *(See, Village of Pelham Manor v Crea,*112 AD2d 415.)

Respondents contend that the imposition of a $500,000 bond was unconstitutional due to improper notice and an insufficient opportunity to be heard. However, the order to show cause and the pleadings clearly apprised respondents of the relevant facts and the relief sought, and sufficiently afforded respondents an opportunity to respond. *(See, Mullane v Central Hanover Trust Co.,*339 US 306.) Moreover, the prayer for relief requested that the court grant "such other relief as may be deemed just and appropriate”.

We have considered all other issues and find them to be meritless. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.28


                             AMENDMENT NUMBER 3 TO
                            MOVADO GROUP, INC. 1996
                              STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                              --------------------

The Board of Directors of Movado Group, Inc., a New York corporation (the
"Company") hereby adopts this Amendment Number 3 to the Company's 1996 Stock
Incentive Plan, as previously amended, (the "Plan") effective upon approval by
the holders of a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of common
stock and class A common stock of the Company present in person or represented
by proxy and entitled to vote at the next annual meeting of shareholders,
currently scheduled to be held June 19, 2001.

     1. Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
        follows: "3 Eligibility. Awards under the Plan may be granted to such
        officers, directors and executive, managerial, professional, or other
        key employees of the Company or its Affiliates and to such non-employee
        individuals with whom the Company or any of its Affiliates contracts to
        perform consulting or other services as the Committee shall from time to
        time in its sole discretion select".

     2. In Section 4(a) of the Plan, the first sentence thereof is deleted in
        its entirety and the following is substituted in lieu thereof "Subject
        to Section 13 (relating to adjustments upon changes in capitalization),
        the aggregate number of shares of Stock upon which Awards may be based
        shall not exceed 3,500,000 shares".

     3. Section 4(b) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and the following
        is substituted in lieu thereof: "Subject to Section 13 (relating to
        adjustments upon changes in capitalization), the total number of shares
        of Stock in respect of which Awards may be granted to any one
        participant under the Plan during any calendar year shall not exceed
        1,200,000 shares of Stock."

Upon the effectiveness of the foregoing amendments to the Plan, all references
to the Plan shall be deemed to mean the Plan as amended hereby.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1245 

To amend title IV–A of the Social Security Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. LAHOOD (for himself and Mrs. WALORSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title IV–A of the Social Security Act, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Access to 

5 Child Care Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPROVING ACCESS TO CHILD CARE TO SUPPORT 

7 WORK. 

8 Section 418(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 618(a)(3)) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘$2,917,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 and 2018’’ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1245 IH

1 and inserting ‘‘$3,525,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

2 2019 through 2023’’. 

3 SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF CONTINGENCY FUND. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 403 of the Social Security 

5 Act (42 U.S.C. 603) is amended by striking all of sub6 section (b) except paragraph (5). 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

8 (1) TRANSFER OF NEEDY STATE DEFINI9 TION.— 

10 (A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (5) of sec11 tion 403(b) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 603(b)(5)) 

12 is— 

13 (i) amended— 

14 (I) in the matter preceding sub15 paragraph (A), by striking ‘‘para16 graph (4)’’ and inserting ‘‘subpara17 graph (C)’’; 

18 (II) in each of subparagraphs (A) 

19 and (B), by redesignating clauses (i) 

20 and (ii) as subclauses (I) and (II), re21 spectively; 

22 (III) by redesignating subpara23 graphs (A) and (B) as clauses (i) and 

24 (ii), respectively; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1245 IH

1 (IV) by redesignating such para2 graph as subparagraph (D); and 

3 (V) by moving each provision 2 

4 ems to the right; and 

5 (ii) as so amended, hereby transferred 

6 into section 409(a)(3) (42 U.S.C. 

7 609(a)(3)) and added to the end of such 

8 section. 

9 (B) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

10 409(a)(3)(C) (42 U.S.C. 609(a)(3)(C)) is 

11 amended by striking ‘‘(as defined in section 

12 403(b)(5))’’. 

13 (2) ELIMINATION OF PENALTY FOR FAILURE

14 OF STATE RECEIVING AMOUNTS FROM CONTINGENCY

15 FUND TO MAINTAIN 100 PERCENT OF HISTORIC EF16 FORT.—Section 409(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

17 609(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (10). 

18 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

19 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 

20 on October 1, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**The Board of DirectorsBowne & Co., Inc.:     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (Nos. 333-102046, 333-64836, 333-79409, 333-81639,2-96887, 33-48831, 33-35810 and 333-57045) on Forms S-8 andin the registration statements (Nos. 333-109810, 333-25861,333-25849, and 333-18629) filed on Forms S-3 ofBowne & Co., Inc. of our report dated April 27,2005, with respect to management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, whichreport appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report onForm 10-K/ A of Bowne & Co., Inc.     Our report dated April 27, 2005, on management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, expressesour opinion that Bowne & Co., Inc. did not maintaineffective internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2004 because of the effect of materialweaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the controlcriteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states thatBowne & Co., Inc. lacked sufficient reconciliation andreview controls over purchase accounting adjustments for theglobalization segment, and also lacked sufficient reconciliationand review controls over the determination of legal entityprofitability, income tax expense and the related income taxaccounts for the globalization segment./s/     KPMG LLPNew York, New YorkApril 27, 2005
Exhibit
      32.1











Written
      Statement of the President and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C ss.1350 as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Bureau of National
      Affairs, Inc. (the “Company”), for the year ending December 31, 2005 (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, the undersigned, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge and solely for
      the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
                15(d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
                that





2.
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








03/13//06                                         By: 
      s/Paul N. Wojcik


Date  Paul
      N.
      Wojcik


President
      and Chief
      Executive Officer





49
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Allan L. Bridgford, Chairman of the Board of Bridgford Foods Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 29, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: January 27, 2005



/s/    ALLAN L.
BRIDGFORDAllan L. Bridgford,Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132909 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132909 COA: 260020 Wayne CC: 03-010863 JOHN GOLDEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2007

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1118 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1118

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow deductions and 
  credits relating to expenditures in connection with marijuana sales 
                conducted in compliance with State law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2019

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow deductions and 
  credits relating to expenditures in connection with marijuana sales 
                conducted in compliance with State law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Tax Equity Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTIONS AND CREDITS RELATING TO EXPENDITURES IN 
              CONNECTION WITH MARIJUANA SALES CONDUCTED IN COMPLIANCE 
              WITH STATE LAW.

    (a) In General.--Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``, 
unless such trade or business consists of marijuana sales conducted in 
compliance with State law''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

AMNA SALAHUDDIN,

 Petitioner

 v.

ZONING HEARING BOARD OF WEST

CHESTER AND BOROUGH OF WEST

CHESTER,

 Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 921 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Exhibit 99.2





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








Board of Directors and Shareholders


Capital Southwest Corporation and Subsidiaries








Our audit of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated May 24, 2022, appearing in Capital Southwest Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K also included an audit of the senior securities table of Capital Southwest Corporation and Subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) as of March 31, 2022, included in Part II, Item 5 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2022. This table is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits of the consolidated financial statements.





In our opinion, the senior securities table, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.





/s/ RSM US LLP





Chicago, Illinois


May 24, 2022
What measure can be taken to protect farmers/processors/legit retailers with local law enforcement in circumstances such as transporting raw material, selling on open market, selling at farmers markets, etc? 

Farmers need someone to sell product to so buyers can’t be intimated, therefore it’s important to provide measures for farmers to have trade without incident of false arrest, confiscations, etc. 

All the best!

Nicholas Julian

Suolo Therapeutics, LLC
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1173 

To require that $1 coins issued during 2019 honor President George H.W. 

Bush and to direct the Secretary of the Treasury to issue bullion coins 

during 2019 in honor of Barbara Bush. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2019 

Mr. WILLIAMS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require that $1 coins issued during 2019 honor President 

George H.W. Bush and to direct the Secretary of the 

Treasury to issue bullion coins during 2019 in honor 

of Barbara Bush. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘President George H.W. 

5 Bush and Barbara Bush Dollar Coin Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1173 IH

1 SEC. 2. COINS HONORING PRESIDENT GEORGE H.W. BUSH 

2 AND BARBARA BUSH. 

3 (a) CIRCULATING $1 COINS HONORING PRESIDENT

4 GEORGE H.W. BUSH.—Notwithstanding subsections (d), 

5 (n)(2)(E), (n)(3), (n)(4), and (n)(8) of section 5112 of 

6 title 31, United States Code, in addition to the coins to 

7 be issued under subsection (r) of such section 5112, and 

8 in accordance with the other provisions of subsection (n) 

9 of such section 5112, $1 coins issued during the 1-year 

10 period beginning on January 1, 2019, shall bear the image 

11 of President George H.W. Bush. 

12 (b) BULLION COINS HONORING BARBARA BUSH.— 

13 Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (5)(C) of section 

14 5112(o) of title 31, United States Code, and in accordance 

15 with the other provisions of such section 5112(o), the Sec16 retary of the Treasury shall, during the 1-year period be17 ginning on January 1, 2019, issue bullion coins that bear 

18 the image of Barbara Bush. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS