## DATE: January 30 , 2012

**SUBJECT:** Development of the RTR Risk Modeling Dataset for the Secondary Aluminum Production Source Category **FROM:** Mark Bahner, RTI International **TO:** Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA) The purpose of this memorandum is to document the technical approach and rationale used to develop risk modeling input data for hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions for secondary aluminum production facilities

. This work is being performed pursuant to section 112(f) of the Clean Air Act as part of the residual risk assessment for facilities that are subject to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Secondary Aluminum Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart RRR). **1. Facilities Modeled**  There are an estimated 161 facilities subject to the Secondary Aluminum Production NESHAP. Risk assessment inputs were developed for 155 facilities, as shown in **Table 1** . There were six facilities that are subject to the Secondary Aluminum NESHAP that were not included in the risk assessment input files, as shown in **Table 2** . The facilities that were not included in the risk assessment input files included one major HAP source and five area HAP source s . The major HAP source was not included because the secondary

aluminum equipment at the source consists of group 2 furnaces, which do not have emission limits under the NESHAP. The five area sources were not included because they had no equipment subject to dioxins/furans emissions standards, which are the only standards applicable to secondary aluminum production area sources. **2. Emission Process Groups Modeled**  **Table 3**  shows the secondary aluminum emission process groups that were modeled. Also modeled as part of facility

-wide risk assessments were primary aluminum sources that were collocated at secondary aluminum facilities. Finally, other collocated operations such as coating lines, gas

- fired boilers and other emission processes were also included in the facility

-wide modeling

. Group 2 furnaces were not included in the modeling dataset because the EPA did not have HAP emissions estimates for those furnaces. **3. Collocated Sources**  The modeling inputs for the primary aluminum operations collocated at secondary aluminum production facilities are exactly the same as the inputs used in the recent risk assessment for the primary aluminum production source category

. 1

## 2

**4. Compound** **- Specific Emissions**  The pollutants regulated under subpart RRR are particulate matter (PM), hydrochloric acid (HCl), total hydrocarbon (THC) and dioxins/furans (D/F). Emissions standards for the affected secondary aluminum sources are given in **Table 4**  . Subpart RRR uses PM as a surrogate for metallic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and THC is a surrogate for organic HAPs. Since subpart RRR compliance testing is performed for the surrogate PM and THC, there are limited test data available for compound

- specific metallic and organic HAP emissions. Inorder to generate compound

- specific metallic HAP and organic HAP data, Clean Air Act Section 114 requests (also known as Information Collection Requests or ICRs) were sent to nine companies, asking them to perform tests and provide the resulting data regarding metallic HAP and organic HAP emissions

. 2 

## The metallic HAP data reported in the ICRs consisted of metallic HAP concentrations in the particulate collected in air pollution control devices that controlled emissions from various pieces of equipment. Using these test data, **Table 5**  presents the average , minimum, and maximum concentrations of metallic HAPs in PM emitted from individual secondary aluminum operations. Itshould be noted that the testing ICR was not designed exclusively to obtain metallic HAP data. Rather, the intent was to contact nine companies that operated many pieces of equipment, with an emphasis on companies that operated thermal chip dryers or scrap dryer/delacquering/decoating kilns (because the latter two pieces of equipment are relatively rare in the industry)

. However, even though gathering metallic HAP data was only one of the goals of the testing ICR, the data gathered is considered representative, because in most cases, many data points from multiple plants for each piece of equipment were obtained. See Table 5 for the results of metals testing; the average values in Table 5 were used in the residual risk input file. The data in Table 5 can be used to calculate emissions of specific metallic HAPs from a particular piece of secondary

aluminum equipment. For example, assume a Group 1 f urnace handling other than clean charge receives 100,000 tons p er year (tpy) of charge . The allowable emissions of PM (from Table 4) are 0.4 lb/ton of charge , so allowable emissions of PM are 40,000 lb/year (or 20 tons per year)

. The average concentration of antimony (from Table 5 ) in the PM is 18.6 mg/kg (i.e., 18.6 parts per million, or ppm). The calculated allowable emissions of antimony are therefore 20 tpy

times 18.6 ppm, or 3.72E- 04 tpy. The ICR organic HAP data were collected by performing stack testing on thermal chip dryers and scrap dryer/delacquering decoating kilns, which are the two ty pes of secondary

aluminum sources that are regulated for THC emissions. Testing was conducted for both THC and individual organic HAP emissions . Test results were reported as pounds per ton of feed (lb/ton of feed). The collected information was used to calculate allowable emissions for each organic HAP at the THC limit given in the standard

. For example, the THC limit for a thermal chip dryer is 0.8 lb/ton of feed. If the test results were 0.4 lb/ton of feed for THC, and 1E

- 03 lb/ton of feed for benzene, the allowable benzene emissions would be 2E

- 03 lb/ton of feed (i.e., since the measured THC emissions were half of the NESHAP limit, the measured benzene emissions were multiplied by two to calculate the allowable emissions. Results for allowable emissions of organic HAPs are summarized in **Table 6**  , in kilograms per megagram (kg/Mg) of feed. The results are separated into volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs). The results in Table 6 can be converted to allowable emissions for each organic HAP for each piece of equipment. Take the example, of a thermal chip dryer with a production of 100,000 tpy. The allowable emissions (in the “average” column) for acrylonitrile from a thermal chip dryer are 9.89E- 04 kg/Mg. Therefore, the allowable acrylonitrile emissions for this piece of equipment would be 0.0989 tons per year (i.e., 100,000 tpy, multiplied by 9.89E -4 kg/Mg, divided by 1000 kg/Mg).

## 3

As described above, Tables 5 and 6 were used in conjunction with production data to estimate allowable speciated metallic and organic HAP emissions for each piece of equipment subject to Subpart RRR at each facility. As also described above, it was necessary to do this because the standards for metallic HAPs are in the form of a PM surrogate, and the standards for organic HAPs are in the form of a THC surrogate. Therefore, facilities measure the PM and THC surrogates to determine compliance with the standards, rather than measuring speciated metallic and organic HAPs. This conversion was not necessary for HCl, since HCl is the form of the standard, and facilities are directly measuring HCl. Facilities also report D/F emissions; these emissions will be discussed in Section 8 . **5. All** **- C**  **o mpany ICR Responses**  In addition to the nine

- company testing ICR sent out on May 27, 2010, an ICR was sent to all facilities thought to potentially

be subject to subpart RRR on February 7 , 2011 . 3 

## Responses to this request were used for many of the modeling inputs, including:

 Latitudes and longitudes of stacks  Height, diameter, exhaust gas flow rate, and exhaust gas temperature for stack release s  Ty pe of equipment exhausting to stacks (e.g. scrap shredder, thermal chip dryer, group 1 f urnace handling other than clean charge, etc.)  Aluminum production of equipment exhausting to stacks , and  Reported actual emissions PM (as a surrogate for HAP metals), THC (as a surrogate for organic HAPs), HCl, D/F (either reported as individual congeners or TEQ, or both), and other HAPs, chiefly from collocated sources (except for primary aluminum, for which modeling files had already been developed 1 

## ). Three separate ty

pes of information regarding equipment production or capacity were requested :

 Mass of charge (tons/yr)

– this was the actual charge in the most recent ye ar (after 2004)  Maximum capacity

of unit (tons/year) , and  Charge during most recent performance test (lb/hr) The maximum capacity

of the unit (tons/year) was used to estimate allowable emissions for the unit, whereas actual emissions were based on the amount of charge for the most recent ye ar (after 2004). **6. Allowable Emissions**  **Calculation Procedures** Allowable emissions were calculated as the product of the maximum capacity of the unit (from the all

company ICR response) times a conversion factor that calculated the allowable emissions of the surrogate pollutant (e.g., PM or THC) times the concentration of the compound

- specific metallic or organic HAP (from the nine

- company testing ICR responses, as shown in Tables 5 and 6). **Table 7**  shows how conversion factors were calculated for each piece of equipment and pollutant, and **Ta ble**  **8** summarizes the conversion factors used in the allowable emissions calculations. **Table 9**  provides an example of allowable emissions calculations for a HAP metal (antimony) , HCl, D/F (in toxic equivalents), a volatile organic HAP (acrylonitrile) , and a semi

-volatile organic HAP (acenaphthene)

. **7. Actual Emissions**  **Calculation Procedures** Actual emissions were calculated as a fraction of allowable emissions , using the actual amount charged in the most recent ye ar (from the all

- company ICR responses) , and the actual emissions of sur rogate pollutants (from the all

- company ICR responses)

. Itshould be noted that nearly all companies provided

## 4

only the surrogate pollutant information (i.e., PM and THC) rather than the speciated HAP information (i.e. speciated HAP metals and speciated organic HAP). Further, no company provided the complete suite of metallic and organic HAPs for which extensive testing was conducted in the nine

- company ICR. Therefore, we used reported surrogate emissions and calculated the speciated metallic and organic HAP emissions using the nine

- company testing data. The only instances where we used the facilities’ reported speciated metallic and organic HAP emissions were for the facility

-wide HAP emissions modeling, when processes were not covered under the secondary aluminum or primary aluminum NESHAPs. **Table 1**  **0** provides an example of actual emissions calculations for a HAP metal (antimony), HCl, D/F (in toxic equivalents), a volatile organic HAP (acrylonitrile), and a semi

-volatile organic HAP (acenaphthene). **8. Stack Locations and Stack Characteristics**  Stack latitudes and longitudes as reported in the ICR responses were plotted using Google EarthTM and sent to facilities for confirmation or correction when time was available. The confirmation or correction consisted of sending individual facilities a picture (.jpg) file of the ICR response latitudes and longitudes plotted in Google EarthTM , with a request that the facility either confirm or correct the plotted locations. When there was insufficient time to obtain facility responses, the results plotted in Google EarthTM were simply checked to ensure that the stack latitudes and longitudes were located on a building at the facility site, or at a control device near a building. Where the results were not located on or near a building at the facility site or a control device, the latitudes and longitudes were adjusted. **9. Default Values**  If emissions were not reported in the ICR responses, default emission factors were used. These default emission factors were the average values determined from test results that were reported and credible. **Table 11**  summarizes the default emission factors used for modeling. For example, the a verage D/F emission rate during testing of Group 1 furnaces processing other than clean charge was 2.16 μ g/Mg of feed, and the emission limit is 15 μ g/Mg of feed. Therefore, the average test result was 0.144 times the standard. Similarly, the average PM emission rate during testing of Group 1 furnaces firing other than clean charge was 0.184 lb/ton of feed, and the emission limit is 0.4 lb/ton of feed; therefore, the average test result was 0.460 times the standard. Default production capacity factor values were also used when the actual production in the most recent ye ar was not given, or was claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI). Production capacity factor is the ratio of the actual production for the most recent year divided by the production capacity

. As with the default emission factors, the default production capacities were taken as the average production capacity

for all equipment of the same ty pe. **Table 12**  summarizes default production cap acity factors

. The method in which these defaults were used can be illustrated for a facility that has reported a maximum production capacity for a group 1 furnace handling only cl ean charge of 100,000 tpy, but reported the actual production in the most recent year as CBI. If so, the production capacity factor of 0.493 would be used, and the actual production would be assumed to be 49,300 tpy. Similarly, if HCl emissions were not reported for this furnace, the default emission factor of 0.144 lb/ton would be used. Therefore, the actual HCl emissions would be calculated as 49,300 tpy times 0.144 lb/ton, or 7099 lb/y r, or 3 .55 tpy.

## 5

**10. Chromium and Mercury Speciation**  Mercury emissions from the S econdary Aluminum Production source category are extremely

low (on the order of one pound per year for all of the secondary aluminum production major sources. However, for risk modeling purposes, mercury emissions were assumed to be 80 percent elemental gaseous mercury, 10 percent divalent gaseous mercury and 10 percent particulate mercury

. Chromium speciation between hexavalent chromium and total chromium was as shown in Table 5 for Subpart RRR sources. For other facility

-wide sources, 3 percent of chromium was assumed to be hexavalent. **11. Allowable and**  **Actual Emissions Results for D/F** D/F was determined to be a risk driver for both major sources and area sources. In fact, D/F was the only HAP modeled for area sources. Therefore, the procedures used to calculate D/F emissions and the resulting calculated emissions will be presented here. The all

- company ICR requested that facilities provide individual D/F congener data. However, many facilities provided both individual congener data and TEQ values, and some facilities provided only TEQ values. The May

23, 2000 Federal Register notice for the secondary

aluminum NESHAP directs facilities to calculate TEQ values using EPA

625/3

- 89 - 016, so the individual congener toxic equivalency factor (TEF) values in that document were used to calculate TEQ values for this modeling. Calculated allowable and actual emissions of D/F (in TEQ) for major sources are presented in **Table 1 3**  and for area sources in **Table 1 4**  . **12. Quality Control Checks**  **and Resulting Changes** Data reported in the ICRs were checked in several ways. The paragraphs below discuss data quality checks that were performed and change s that were made when data reported in the ICR responses were found to be incorrect.

 First, the stack latitudes and longitudes reported by facilities were checked in Google EarthTM , as previously

described.  Anomalously

high production value s for RTI #120 (Crestwood Metals) were resolved through discussions with a consultant for that company

.  For RTI #257 and #352, test reports were received but no ExcelTM workbook ICR response s were received. Therefore, risk input files were developed from the test reports and Google EarthTM images. Similarly, air permits were available for RTI #85 and #384, but no ExcelTM workbook ICR responses were received. Risk input files were therefore developed from the air permits and Google EarthTM images.  In general, emissions from non

- Subpart RRR equipment were input directly into risk files. One facility

(RTI #292, NEI8066) reported anomalously high emissions of nickel from a painting line; contacts with the facility established that the painting line did not emit nickel.  Source category

classification (SCC) codes were defaulted where they were missing based on process descriptions. **13. References**  1 . Primary

Aluminum Actual and Allowable Emissions Modeling Files , available as docket item: EPA-HQ - OAR-2011 - 0797 - 0143. 2. Letter, Peter Tsirigotis (U.S. EPA) to Michael Palazollo (Alcoa) et al., “Requirement to provide information according to Title 42 of the United States Code, Chapter 85, Subchapter I, Part A,

## 6

section 7414 (42 U.S.C 7414) , ” May 27, 2010 . This was the cover letter for the nine

- company testing ICR. 3 . Letter, Peter Tsirigotis (U.S. EPA) to Russell Mayfield (Mayfield Salvage Company) et al., “Requirement to provide information according to 42 U.S.C 7414 , ” February 7, 2011. This was the cover letter for the all

- company data collection ICR.

## 7 

# List of Tables Table 1. List of 155 Secondary Aluminum Production Facilities Modeled for Residual Risk

.............. 8 Table 2. List of 6 Aluminum Production Facilities Not Modeled for Secondary Aluminum Risk

...... 14 Table 3. Secondary

Aluminum Emission Process Groups Modeled

................................ .................... 15 Table 4. Emission Standards for New and Existing Affected Sources

................................ ................. 16 Table 5. Summary of Metallic HAP Test Results

................................ ................................ ................. 18 Table 6. Summary

of Organic HAP Test Results, Allowable Emissions (kg/Mg charge)

................... 19 Table 7. Calculations for Conversion Factors

................................ ................................ ....................... 20 Table 8. Conversion Factor Summary

................................ ................................ ................................ .. 23 Table 9. Example of Allowable Emissions Calculations

................................ ................................ ...... 24 Table 10. Example of Actual Emissions Calculations

................................ ................................ ............ 24 Table 11. Default Pollutant Emission Factors

................................ ................................ ........................ 25 Table 12. Default Capacity Factors ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 25 Table 13. Allowable and Actual D/F Emissions, Major Sources

................................ ........................... 26 Table 14. Allowable and Actual D/F Emissions, Area Sources

................................ ............................. 28

## 8

**Table 1. List of 155 Secondary Aluminum Production Facilities Modeled for Residual Risk**  **RTI Number**  **Facility ID**  **Facility Name**  **Facility Address**  **Facility City**  **Facility**

**State Zip Code**  **Major/Area Source**  **Status** 2 NEI3AL01123SMA SMA- Mayfield Salvage Co. P.O. Box 129 Alexander City AL 35011 Area 7 NEI3AL01109Ell Ellis Metals 231 South Brundidge AL 36010 Area 11 NEI3AL01071Imp Imperial Alumin um - Scottsboro 7525 Roy Owens Blvd. Scottsboro AL 35769 Area 17 NEI3AR05017Liv Livingston Pecan & Metal Inc. 219 Commerce Street Lake Village AR 71653 Area 18 NEI3AR05119Met Metro Scrap Metals, Inc. 6915 Hwy. 70 E. North Little Rock AR 72117 Area 20 NE I3AR05033Dav Davis Iron & Metal 611 South 23rd Street Van Buren AR 72956 Area 23 NEI3AZ04019Amc Amcep Metals Company 4484 East Tennessee Street Tucson AZ 85714 Area 25 NEI3CA06037Tho Thorock Metals Company Inc. 435 East W eber Ave Compton CA 90222 Area 3 9 NEI3FL12115Al Al'S Pick N Pull, Inc. 4801 Preymore Street Osprey FL 34229 Area 50 NEI3IA19061Dit Dittmer's Recycling 19108 Herber Rd. Dubuque IA 52001 Area 53 NEI3IA19019Tou Tournier's Recycling Inc. 1644 Nathan Bethel Ave. Independence IA 50644 Area 55 NEI3IA19195Buc Buck's Auto Recycling 1541 A Hwy 9 Manly IA 50456 Area 56 NEI3IA19097BG B. G. Salvage 7141 Hurstville Rd. Maquoketa IA 52060 Area 63 NEI3IN18005Nik Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc 6875 South Inwood Dr. Columbus IN 47201 Area 65 NEI3IN1 8089Uni United Tranz Core LLC 1200 145th Street 4400 Homerlee Ave. East Chicago IN 46312 Area 68 NEI3IN18069Tra Transmetco, Inc. 1750 East Riverfork Drive Huntington IN 46750 Area 71 NEI3IN18169Met Metal Source LLC 1743 S. W abash St. Wa bash IN 46992 Area 72 NEI3IN18069Hea Heartland Aluminum 706 East 9th Street Wa rren IN 46792 Area 73 NEI3KS20001Ray Rays Metal Depot 320 W Highway 54 La Harpe KS 66751 Area 74 NEI3KS20151Arn Arnett Automotive 308 Pedigo Pratt KS 67124 Area 76 NEIKS20173DON Donham Company 1631 S. Hoover Ct. Wi chita KS 67209 Area 79 NEI11365 Rio Tinto Alcan 9404 State Route 2096 Robards KY 42452 Major 80 NEI3MA25013Cen Center Street Auto 651 Center St. Chicopee MA 01013 Area 83 NEI3MA25023Mid Middleboro Recycling 128 Bedford Middleboro M A 02346 Area 85 NEIMD24005MAR Maryland Recycle Company 8920 Yellowbrick Road Baltimore MD 21237 Area 87 NEI3MD24031Mon Montgomery Scrap 15000 Southlawn Dr. Rockville MD 20850 Area 89 NEI3MI26163AMP AM P Recycling Inc. 411 South Fort Detroit MI 48217 Area 91 NEI3MI26077Kai Kaiser Aluminum Fabricated Products, LLC 5205 Kaiser Drive Kalamazoo MI 49048 Area

## 9

**RTI Number**  **Facility ID**  **Facility Name**  **Facility Address**  **Facility City**  **Facility**

**State Zip Code**  **Major/Area Source**  **Status** 93 NEI3MN27063Ron Ron Rehnelt Salvage Berg Street Lakefield MN 56150 Area 95 NEI3MN27103Man Mankato Iron & Metal Company 215 West Elm Street Mankato MN 56001 Area 97 NEI3MN27015New New Ulm Steel & Recycling, Inc. 218 19th Street New Ulm MN 56073 Area 101 NEI2MO097008 Commercial Metals Company 12th and Iowa Streets Joplin MO 64801 Area 112 NEI3NH33015We b We ber Auto And Truck Parts Corp. 135 Island Pond Rd Derry NH 03038 Area 117 NEI3NY36001NH N. H. Kelman, Inc. 41 Euclid Street Cohoes NY 12047 Area 118 NEI3NY36067Met Metalico Aluminum Recovery 6223 Thompson Rd. East Syracuse NY 13057 Area 120 NEI3AL01123Cre Crestwood Metal Company 1100 Lincoln Avenue Holbrook NY 11741 Major 124 NEI3NY360991Luf Luffman Metal Company 2790 Thorpe Road Seneca Falls NY 13148 Area 126 NEI3OH39049G - C G - Cor Automotive 2100 Refugee Road Columbus OH 43207 Area 134 NEI3OH39133Alu Aluminum W heel Technologies, Inc. 446 W Lake S t. Ravenna OH 44266 Area 135 NEI3OH39023Sta Staker Alloys 1075 James St. Springfield OH 45503 Area 136 NEI3OH39023Cit City W ide Towing And Auto Wrecking 930 Dayton Ave. Springfield OH 45506 Area 138 NEI3OH39099Div Diver- Steel City Auto Crushers 590 Himrod Avenue Youngstown OH 44506 Area 141 NEI3OK40101Yaf Yaffe Iron & Metal Co., Inc. Corner G and Lexington Ave Muskogee OK 74403 Area 145 NEI3PA42051Ass Assad Iron & Metals, Inc. Albany Road Brownsville PA 15417 Area 154 NEI3PA42011Rea Reading Alloys Inc

. - Robesonia Old WPenn Ave Robesonia PA 19551 Area 156 NEI3PA42133Pen Pennex Aluminum Company 50 Community Street We llsville PA 17365 Area 164 NEI3TN47113Mos Most, Inc. - Jackson 355 James Lawrence Road Jackson TN 38301 Area 165 NEI3TN47059MD MD Recyc ling, Inc. 1230 Pottertown Road Midway TN 37809 Area 167 NEITN1190123 Tennessee Aluminum Processors, Inc. 7207 Hoover Mason Road Mount Pleasant TN 38474 - 1037 Area 169 NEI3TN47123Val Valley Recycling 325 Industrial Park Road Sweetwater TN 37874 Area 173 NEI3TX48113Bis Bishop Engine And Automotive Building B 224 North Corinth Street Dallas TX 75203 Area 190 NEI3W I55075Kar Karl Schmidt Unisia, Inc. 1731 Industrial Parkway Marinette WI 54143 Area 191 NEIW I079241213720 Miller Compressing Co 1640 W Bruce St Milwaukee WI 53204 Area 195A NEI10933 Alcoa, Inc. (North plant) 2300 North W right Rd Alcoa TN 37701 Major 195B NEI10933b Alcoa, Inc. (South plant) 300 North Hall Rd Alcoa TN 37701 Major 196 NEI3TN47119Sme Smelter Service Corp. 400 Arrow Mines Rd Mount P leasant TN 38474 - 1605 Area 198 NEI3KY21151Nov Novelis Corporation 302 Mayde Rd Berea KY 40403 Major

## 10

**RTI Number**  **Facility ID**  **Facility Name**  **Facility Address**  **Facility City**  **Facility**

**State Zip Code**  **Major/Area Source**  **Status** 199 NEI11360 Southwire Co 1987 State Route 271 North Hawesville KY 42348 Major 200 NEI11362 Aleris Rolled Products, Inc. 1372 State Route 1957 Lewisport KY 423510480 Major 203 NEI11394 Kaiser Aluminum Fabricated Products, LLC 600 Kaiser Drive Heath OH 43056 Area 207 NEI12240 Alcoa Inc. 4879 State St Riverdale IA 52722 Major 210 NEI1532 Golden Aluminum Inc. 1405 East 14th Street Fort Lupton CO 80621 -2718 Area 211 NEI18317 Hydro Aluminum W ells - Monett 120 Industrial Drive Monett MO 65708 Major 212 NEI3AZ04013Hal Halna, Inc. 249 S. 51st Ave. Phoenix AZ 85043 Area 213 NEI3CA06001Cus Custom Alloy Scrap Sales, Inc. 2730 Peralta St. Oakland CA 94607 Area 2 22 NEI22948 Vista Metals Corporation 13425 W hittram Ave Fontana CA 92335 Area 224 NEI3AR05115JW JWAluminum Company 777 Tyler Road Russellville AR 72802 Major 225 NEI2AZT18161 Alcoa Forgings 6833 W. W illis Rd. Chandler AZ 85226 Area 228 NEI2IA01 - 089 Nic hols Aluminum Casting 2101 JM Morris Blvd Davenport IA 52802 Major 231 NEI3MI26145Ale Aleris Specification Alloys, Inc. 2600 Nodular Drive Saginaw MI 48601 Area 232 NEI3MI26023Ale Aleris Recycling, Inc/Aleris Specification Alloys, Inc. 368 West Garfield Avenue Coldwater MI 49036 Major 248 NEI3OH39019Alu Aluminum One 217 Roosevelt St Minerva OH 44657 - 1541 Area 252 NEI3PA42075Bec Beck Aluminum Alloys 24 Keystone Dr Lebanon PA 17042 -9791 Area 253 NEI3TN47105Ale Aleris Recycling, Inc. 388 Wi lliamson Dr Lou don TN 37774 Area 255 NEI3TX48181Kai Kaiser Aluminum Fabricated Products, LLC 4300 S Sam Rayburn Fwy Sherman TX 75090 -9311 Area 256 NEI2TXT17701 Hydro Aluminum 2000 Economic Drive Commerce TX 75428 Area 257 NEI31872 Scepter, Inc. 6487 North Scepter Rd B icknell IN 47512 Area 258 NEI32032 GMPowertrain Bedford Facility 105 GM Drive Bedford IN 47421 Area 260 NEI3IN18169Ale Aleris Specification Alloys, Inc. 4525 West Old 24 Wa bash IN 46992 -0466 Major 261 NEI32661 Alcoa Inc. - Wa rrick Operations JCT Indian a Highways 66 & 61 Newburgh IN 47630 Major 264 NEI34464 Noranda Aluminum, Inc. 391 Saint Jude Industrial Park New Madrid MO 63869 Major 266 NEI3MO29510JW JWAluminum, St. Louis 6100 S. Broadway St. Louis MO 63111 Major 269 NEI3NY36075Nov Novelis Corporation 448 County Rt 1A Oswego NY 13126 Major 270 NEI39458 Alcoa Massena Operations (W est Plant) Park Avenue East Massena NY 13662 Major 272 NEI41217 Alumax of SC, Incorporated 3575 Hwy 52 N Goose Creek SC 29445 Major

## 11

**RTI Number**  **Facility ID**  **Facility Name**  **Facility Address**  **Facility City**  **Facility**

**State Zip Code**  **Major/Area Source**  **Status** 273 NEI3SC45015JW JWAluminum Co 2475 Trenton Ave Wi lliamsport PA 17701 Major 274 NEI42328 Aluminum Co. of America - We natchee W orks 6200 Malaga Alcoa Hwy Malaga WA 98828 Major 276 NEI43018 Mercury Marine - Fond Du Lac Complex W6250 WPioneer Rd Fond Du Lac WI 54935 Major 278 NEI47821 Tria lco, Inc. 900 E. 14th St. Chicago Heights IL 60411 Area 279 NEI3IL17031All Allied Metal Co. 4528 W. Division Street Chicago IL 60616 Area 282 NEI3LA22083Sap Sapa Extrusions, L.L.C. 142 Sapa Drive Delhi LA 71232 Area 283 NEI6464 Alcoa - Rockdale Operatio ns Market Road 1786 Rockdale TX 76567 Major 284 NEI3TX48067Alu Alumax Mill Products, Inc. 300 Alumax Dr Texarkana TX 75501 Major 288 NEI3PA42071Alu Alumax Mill Products Inc. 1480 Manheim Pike Lancaster PA 17604 Major 289 NEI7212 Alcoa Mill Products - Sa n Antonio 14555 Old Corpus Christi Road Elmendorf TX 78112 Major 291 NEI790 Sapa Extrusion 2500 Alumax Road Yankton SD 57078 Major 292 NEI8066 Wi lliam L. Bonnell Co., Inc. 25 Bonnell St Newnan GA 30263 Major 294 NEI8093 Novelis Corporation 1261 Wi llow R un Rd. Greensboro GA 306420837 Major 298a NEI8522 Wi se Alloys LLC -Alloys Reclamation Plant 1009 Ford Road Muscle Shoals AL 35661 Major 298b NEI8522b Wi se Alloys LLC - Alloys Plant 4805 Second St. Muscle Shoals AL 35661 Major 299 NEI3TN47159W il Wi lliam L . Bonnell Company, Inc.(The) 53 Hwy, Bonnell Lane Carthage TN 38563 Major 302 NEI3AL01055Ten Tennessee Aluminum Processors, Inc. 205 Spurline Dr Gadsden AL 35903 -3476 Area 303 NEIALT$4622 Aleris Specifiation Alloys, Inc. 47 Brogdon Rd Steele AL 35987 Maj or 305 NEIART$10783 Reynolds Foil Inc, dba reynolds Consumer Products Company 1333 Hwy. 270 Malvern AR 72104 Major 306 NEIAZ354 Imsamet of Arizona 3829 S. Estrella Pky. Goodyear AZ 85338 Area 307 NEI3CA06037Cus Custom Alloy Light Metals 13329 Ector Stre et City Of Industry CA 91746 Area 310 NEI3CA06071TST TST, Inc. 11601 Etiwanda Ave Fontana CA 92337 Area 312 NEICAT$12566 Kaiser Aluminum & Chem Corp. 6250 E. Bandini Blvd. Los Angeles CA 90040 Area 314 NEICO1011137 Dionisio Metal and Iron, Inc. 1004 Pal o Alto Street Pueblo Area CO 81001 Area 316 NEIFL1030114 Metal Industries, Inc. 301 Commerce Blvd Oldsmar FL 34677 Area 318 NEIFL1090013 Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc 200 Riviera Blvd. St Augustine FL 32086 Area

## 12

**RTI Number**  **Facility ID**  **Facility Name**  **Facility Address**  **Facility City**  **Facility**

**State Zip Code**  **Major/Area Source**  **Status** 322 NEI3ID16055Ale Aleris Recycling 1 6168 WPrairie Ave Post Falls ID 83854 Area 324 NEI3IL17031Ale Aleris Recycling 400 E. Lincoln Hwy. Chicago Heights IL 60411 Major 329 NEI3IL17091KB KB Cores - Kankakee 288 W South Tec Dr Kankakee IL 60901 Area 335 NEI3IN18089Jup Jupiter Aluminum Corporation 1745 - 165th Street Hammond IN 46320 Major 336 NEIIN00286 Superior Aluminum Alloys 14214 Edgerton Road New Haven IN 46774 Major 338 NEI3IN18093Rec Recycling Services of Indiana 4635 Peerless Rd Bedford IN 47421 Major 339 NEIIN1690003 Aleris Recycl ing - Wa bash Operations 305 Dimension Ave Wa bash IN 46992 Area 341 NEIIN567 Aluminum Recovery Technologies, Inc. 2170 Production Road Kendalville IN 46755 Major 344 NEIKY0090065 J.L. French Corp 20 Prestwick Drive Glasgow KY 42141 Major 345 NEI3KY21017Ken Kentucky Smelting Technology, Inc. 140 Bellafato Dr Paris KY 40361 Area 347 NEIKY1010130 Hydro Aluminum - Louisville 5801 Riverport Rd Henderson KY 42420 Area 348 NEIKY101233 Audubon Metals, L.L.C. 3055 Ohio Drive Henderson KY 42420 Area 349 NEIKY210 3100 Aleris Recycling, Inc. 609 Gardner Camp Road Morgantown, KY 42261 Major 351 NEIKY2114100 Logan Aluminum 6920 Lewisburg Rd Russellville KY 42276 Major 352 NEIKY22700135 Owl's Head Alloys, Inc 187 Mitch McConnell Drive Bowling Green KY 42101 -7519 Majo r 354 NEIKY938 Electro Cycle, Inc. 230 Baldwin Drive Madisonville KY 42431 Area 363 NEIMIN5957 Aleris Recycling 267 N. Fillmore Rd Coldwater MI 49036 Major 364 NEIMIN6013 Continental Aluminum 29201 Milford Rd. New Hudson MI 48165 Area 369 NEIMO1130046 Most, Inc. - Troy 50 Cherry Blossom Way Troy MO 63379 Area 372 NEIMST$5321 Taber Metals Gulfport L.P. 1900 34th Street Gulfport MS 39501 Area 375 NEI3NJ34007Alu Aluminum Shapes, L.L.C. 9000 River Rd Delair NJ 08110 -3296 Major 376 NEINJR50539 State Metal Industries, Inc. 941 South Second St Camden NJ 08103 Area 381 NEI3NY360991Sce Scepter Inc. - Seneca Falls Operations 11 Lamb Road Seneca Falls NY 13148 Area 384 NEIOH15144601GNWL M13 GNWAluminum, Inc. 1356 Harrisburg Rd Alliance OH 44601 Area 385 NEI3O H39165Qua Quantum Metals 3675 Taft Ave. Lebanon OH 45036 Area 389 NEI3OH39157Ale Aleris Recycling 7335 Newport Road SE Uhrichsville OH 44683 Major 390 NEIOHT$6308 Aleris Rolled Products Inc. 7319 Newport Rd. S.E. Uhrichsville OH 44683 Major 392 NEIOK183 2 Aleris Recycling, Inc. 1508 N. 8th Street Sapulpa OK 74067 Area 394 NEI3PA42125Rit Ritchey Metals Co., Inc. - Hendersonville Plant 30 Georgetown Rd Hendersonville PA 15339 Area

## 13

**RTI Number**  **Facility ID**  **Facility Name**  **Facility Address**  **Facility City**  **Facility**

**State Zip Code**  **Major/Area Source**  **Status** 395 NEIPA23 -2083 Sapa Extrusions 53 Pottsville St. Cressona PA 17929 Major 398 NEIAL01073Ber Berman Brothers Iron & Metal 616 North 33rd Place Birmingham AL 35222 Area 401 NEI3TN47085Sce Scepter, Inc. 1485 Scepter Ln Waverly TN 37185 -3290 Area 404 NEITNT$5135 Norandal USA, Inc. 400 Bill Brooks Drive Huntingdon TN 38344 Area 405 NEI3UT49049Sap Sapa Extrusions, Inc. 1550 N Kirby Ln Spanish Fork UT 84660 Area 407 NEI3VA51041Ale Aleris Rolled Products, Inc. 1801 Reymet Road Richmond VA 23237 -3794 Area 408 NEIWA0630023 Kaiser Aluminum W ashington 15000 E Euclid Spokane WA 99216 Area 409 NEIWA19906 Intalco Aluminum Corp Ferndale 4050 Mountain View Rd Ferndale WA 98248 Major 412 NEI3W I55071BB B & B Metals Processing Co. 14520 Pioneer Rd. Newton WI 53063 Area 415 NEI3W I15500JL J. L. French Corp. 4243 Gateway Drive Sheboygan WI 530 81 Major 416 NEIW I4600412 J. L. French Corp. 3101 South Taylor Dr Sheboygan WI 53081 Major 420 NEIW IT$8394 Beck Aluminum Racine 1349 23rd St Racine WI 53403 Area 421 NEIWV0043 Alcan Rolled Products, L.L.C. Route 2 South Ravenswood WV 26164 Major 422 N EI3WV54095Ale2 Aleris Recycling, Inc. 3816 S State Rt 2 Friendly WV 26146 Area 423 NEI3WV54095Ale1 Aleris Recycling Bens Run LLC 4203 S State Rt 2 Friendly WV 26146 Area

## 14

**Table 2. List of 6 Aluminum Production Facilities Not Modeled for Secondary Alumin** **um Risk**

**RTI Number**  **Facility ID**  **Facility Name**  **Facility A** **ddress Facility**  **City Facility** 

**State Zip** 

**Code Major/Area** 

**Source Status**  6 Bermco Bros Iron & Metal Co. 2201 Fifth Avenue, North Bessemer AL 35020 Area 69 Alcoa Inc - Lafayette Operations 3131 East Ma in Street Lafayette IN 47905 Area 163 Bodine Aluminum - Tennessee 301 James Lawrence Rd Jackson TN 38301 Area 208 NEI12468 Columbia Falls Aluminum Co. 2000 Aluminum Drive Columbia Falls MT 59912 Major 360 NEIMIB6178 Huron Valley Steel Corp 41000 Huron River Dr Belleville MI 48111 Area 362 NEIMIM4547 Fritz Products 255 Marion River Rouge MI 48218 Area

## 15

**Table 3**  **. Secondary Aluminum Emission Process Groups Modeled** 

**Emission Processing**  **Group Description**  1 Aluminum Scrap Shredder 2 Group 1 furnace

– h andling clean charge only 3 Group 1 furnace

– handling other than clean charge 4 In - line fluxer 5 Rotary dross cooler 6 Scrap dryer/delacquering kiln /decoating kiln 7 Sweat furnace 8 Thermal chip dryer

## 16

**Table 4**  **. Emission Standards for New and Exis** **ting Affected Sources Af**  **fected source/ Emission unit Pollutant**  **Limit Units**  All new and existing affected sources and emission units that are controlled with a PM add -on control device and that choose to monitor with a Continuous Opacity Monitor (COM) and all new and existing aluminum scrap shredders that choose to monitor with a COM or to monitor visible emissions Opacity 10 Percent

New and existing aluminum scrap shredder PM 0.01 gr/dscf New and existing thermal chip dryer THC D/F a 0.80

2.50 lb/ton of feed μg TEQ/Mg of feed New and existing scrap dryer/delacquering kiln/decoating kiln

Or PM HCl THC D/F a 0.08

0.80 0.06 0.25 lb/ton of feed lb/ton of feed lb/ton of feed μg TEQ/Mg of feed Alternative limits if afterburner has a design residence time of at least 1 second and operates at a temperature of at least 1400 °F PM HCl THC D/F a 0.30

1.50 0.20 5.0 lb/ton of feed lb/ton of feed lb/ton of feed μg TEQ/Mg of feed New and existing sweat furnace D/F a 0.80 ng TEQ/dscm @ 11% O 2 b New and existing dross -only furnace PM 0.30 lb/ton of feed New and existing in - line fluxerc HCl PM 0.04

0.01 lb/ton of feed lb/ton of feed New and existing in - line fluxer with no reactive fluxing No limit Wo rk practice: no reactive fluxing New and existing rotary dross cooler PM 0.04 gr/dscf New and existing clean furnace (Group 2) No limit Wo rk practices: clean charge only and no reactive fluxing New and existing group 1 melting/holding furnace (processing only clean charge) c PM HCl 0.80

0.40 or 10 lb/ton of feed lb/ton of feed percent of the HCl upstream of an add -on control device New and existing group 1 furnace c PM HCl 0.40

0.40 or 10 lb/ton of feed lb/ton of feed percent of the HCl upstream of an add -on control device D/F a 15.0 μg TE Q/Mg of feed New and existing group 1 furnace c with clean charge only PM HCl 0.40

0.40 or lb/ton of feed lb/ton of feed 10 percent of the HCl upstream of an add -on control device D/F a No Limit Clean charge only New and existing secondary aluminum processing unita,d (consists of all existing group 1 furnaces and existing in - line flux boxes at the facility, or all simultaneously constructed new group 1 furnaces and new in - line fluxers) PM e 

#     

#  

  

## 

 n i i n i i i t 

## T T L L PM PM 1

1

HCl f 

#  

  

#  

  

## 

 n i i n i i i t 

## T T L L l HC HCl 1

1

## 17

**Af fected source/ Emission unit**  **Pollutant Limit**  **Units** D/F g 

#     

#  

  

## 

 n i i n i i i t 

## T T L L F D F D 1

1 / /

a 

### D/F limit applies to a unit at a major or area source. b 

### Sweat furnaces equipped with afterburners meeting the specifications of §63.1505(f)(1) are not required to conduct a performance test. c 

### These limits are also used to calculate the limits applicable to secondary aluminum processing units. d 

### Equation definitions: LiPM 

### = the PM emission limit for individual emission unit i in the secondary aluminum processing unit [kg/Mg (lb/ton) of feed]; T i 

### = the feed rate for individual emission unit i in the secondary aluminum processing unit; LtPM 

### = the overall PM emission limit for the secondary aluminum processing unit [kg/Mg (lb

-ton) of feed]; LiHCl 

### = the HCl emission limit for individual emission unit i in the secondary aluminum proce ssing unit [kg/Mg (lb/ton) of feed]; LtHCl 

### = the overall HCl emission limit for the secondary aluminum processing unit [kg/Mg (lb/ton) of feed]; LiD/F 

### = the D/F emission limit for individual emission unit i [μg TEQ/Mg (gr TEQ/ton) of feed]; LtD/F 

### = the overall D/F emission limit for the secondary aluminum processing unit [μg TEQ/Mg (gr TEQ/ton) of feed]; n = the number of units in the secondary aluminum processing unit. e 

### In-line fluxers using no reactive flux materials cannot be included in this calculation since they are not subject to the PM limit. f 

### In-line fluxers using no reactive flux materials cannot be included in this calculation since they are not subject to the HCl limit. g 

### Clean charge furnaces cannot be included in this calculation since they are not subject to the D/F limit.

## 18

**Table 5**  **. Summary of Metallic HAP Test Results** 

**Metallic HA P**  **Concentration in Particulate (mg/kg)**

**Al uminum Scrap**  **Shredder Thermal Chip Dry**  **er Scrap Dry** **er/ Delacquering/**  **Decoating Kiln Group 1 Furnace**  **--**

**Handling O** **ther t**  **han C**  **lean C**  **harge Group 1 Furnace**  **-- Clean**  **C harge**  **O nl**  **y Dross**  **- only**  **Furnace In**  **- line Fluxer**  NUMBER OF SAMPLES 7 (^6) 8 9 (^8) 9(^10) 9(^10) 1 1

min ave max min ave max min ave max min ave max min ave max min ave max min ave max Antimony 3.5 9.2 24 8.5* 34 .1 191 2.4 55.6 340 0.5* 18.6 78 0.5* 18.6 78 0.5* 0.5 0.5 0.5* 0.5 0.5 Arsenic 1.6 6.3 16 0.9* 449.1 1370 0.5* 4.3 44 0.5* 1.9 9.1 0.5* 1.9 9.1 0.5* 0.5 0.5 0.5* 0.5 0.5 Beryllium 0.5* 1.4 ^ 4 .9 0. 2 * 0. 9 3.2 0.1* 2 3.3 0.5* 0.5 0.7 0.5* 0.5 0.7 2.8 2.8 2 .8 0.5* 0.5 0.5 Cadmium 0.5* 39.1 99 0.7 17.1 42.1 0.9 34.8 48 0.5* 13.4 51 0.5* 13.4 51 0.5* 0.5 0.5 1.9 1.9 1.9 Chromium III 59 289 ^ 540 16.1 458 1300 16.1 168 360 4.5 11 25 4.5 11 25 460 460 460 4 4 4 Chromium VI 0.0* 0.2 ^ 0.3 0.0* 3.6 11.6 0.0* 0.2 0.5 0.0* 0.2 ^ 0.3 0.0* 0.2 ^ 0.3 0.3 * 0.3 0.3 0.3* 0.3 0.3 Cobalt 2.7 14 47 5.1* 28.8 71 1.7 9.4 37.1 0.5* 1.3 4.3 0.5* 1.3 4.3 2 2 2 1.1 1.1 1.1 Lead 23 936^ 2000 3.5 2768 7400 108 417 2500 2 32.7 130 2 32.7 130 4.9 4.9 4.9 0.5* 0.5 0.5 Manganese 960 12 75 ^ 2000 53.8 2053 4030 48 627 1370 41 101 187 41 101 187 3400 3400 3400 100 100 100 Mercury, elemental 0.02 0.534 1.36 0. 04* 0.08 0.46 0.1 0.49 2 0.008* 0.191 ^ 0.88 0.008* 0.191 ^ 0.88 0.008 * 0.01 0.01 0.008 * 0.008 0.008 Mercury, gaseous 0 0.067 0. 17 0. 0 0* 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.25 0.001* 0.024 ^ 0.11 0.001* 0.024 ^ 0.11 0.001 * 0 0 0.001 * 0.001 0.001 Mercury, particulate 0 0.067 0. 17 0. 00* 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.25 0.001* 0.024 ^ 0.11 0.001* 0.024 ^ 0.11 0.001 * 0 0.01 0.001 * 0.001 0.001 Nickel 34.5 118 280 20 .1 1090 6670 9.4 79 190 4.7 13 24 4.7 13 24 27 27 27 14 14 14 Selenium 0.5* 1.6 3.9 0.5* 15.8 91.9 0.5* 23.1 ^ 26 0.5* 4.1 14 0.5* 4.1 14 0.5* 0.5 0.5 1.9 1.9 1.9 

### 1 ^ indicates that the number of samples for this pollutant was different than for other pollutants. For example, for a scrap shredder, the antimony value was based on seven samples, where the beryllium value was based on six samples. 2 * indicates that some values were below the detection limit and were calculated by the method detection limit divided by two.

## 19

**Table 6. Summary of Organic HAP Test Results, Allowable Emissions (kg/Mg charge)**  **Organic HA P**  **Thermal Chip Dry er**  **Scrap Dry er/ Delacquering/ Decoating Kiln**  **n*** **Min Av** **e Max**  **n Min**  **Av e**  **Max Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)**  Acrylonitrile 107 - 13 - 1 6 3.76E -05 9.89E - 04 1.94E -03 7 2.42E - 05 1.51E -03 3.33E -03 Benzene 71 -43 -2 12 4.28E -06 2.57E - 03 4.52E -03 8 4.06E - 03 5.29E -03 7.19E -03 Bromodichloromethane 75-27 -4 6 3.24E -06 3.24E - 06 3.24E -06 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Carbon disulfide 75- 15-0 9 3.79E -05 1.06E - 04 1.74E -04 8 8.08E - 06 3.80E -03 1.07E -02 Carbon tetrachloride 56 -23 -5 9 3.57E -05 2.38E - 04 4.39E -04 3 2.04E - 05 2.04E -05 2.04E -05 Chlorodibromomethane 124 -48 - 1 6 4.62E -06 4.62E - 06 4.62E -06 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Chloroform 67 -66 -3 12 3.15E -06 2.43E - 04 3.90E -04 6 6.96E - 05 3.05E -04 6.97E -04 Chloroprene 126 - 99 -8 3 7.34E -06 7.34E - 06 7.34E -06 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Dibromomethane 74 -95-3 4 5.29E -06 1.21E - 04 2.38E -04 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1,1 - Dichloroethane 75-34 -3 6 3.24E -06 3.24E - 06 3.24E -06 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1,2 - Dichloroethane 107 - 06 -2 9 3.98E -06 5.13E - 05 9.86E -05 3 2.07E - 05 2.07E -05 2.07E -05 1,1 - Dichloroethene 75-35-4 6 8.26E -06 8.26E - 06 8.26E -06 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 trans - 1,2 - Dichloroethene 156 -60 -5 4 1.31E -05 9.56E - 05 1.78E -04 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1,2 - Dichloropropane 78 -87 - 5 6 4.04E -06 4.04E - 06 4.04E -06 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1,3 - Dichloropropene 542 - 75-6 4 8.18E -06 9.93E - 05 1.90E -04 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00 E+00 Methylene chloride 75-09 -2 15 4.78E -04 1.75E - 03 4.75E -03 10 4.40E - 04 1.44E -03 3.36E -03 Tetrachloroethene 127 - 18 -4 12 9.10E -06 1.77E - 04 3.97E -04 3 5.26E - 05 5.26E -05 5.26E -05 Toluene 108 -88 - 3 12 1.14E -05 1.31E - 03 2.28E -03 7 4.38E - 04 4.81E -03 1. 38E -02 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 71 -55-6 6 4.28E -06 4.28E - 06 4.28E -06 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 79 -00 - 5 6 3.98E -06 3.98E - 06 3.98E -06 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Trichloroethene 79 -01 -6 9 3.98E -06 9.62E - 05 1.88E -04 3 2.48E - 05 2.48E -05 2.48E -05 Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69 -4 12 1.50E -05 5.06E - 04 9.37E -04 6 5.06E - 05 5.06E -04 1.11E -03 **Semi -** **volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC)** Acenaphthene 83 -32 -9 12 0.00E+00 9.23E - 06 2.50E -05 10 0.00E+00 4.05E -04 1.98E - 03 Acenaphthylene 208 -96 -8 10 0.00E+00 3.88E - 05 9.97E -05 11 0.00E+00 1.71E -03 7.96E - 03 Anthracene 120 - 12 - 7 12 0.00E+00 8.12E - 06 2.72E -05 9 0.00E+00 3.17E -04 1.28E - 03 Benz(a)anthracene 56 -55-3 9 0.00E+00 4.69E - 07 1.46E -06 6 0.00E+00 1.08E -04 5.08E - 04 Benzo(a)pyrene 50 -32 -8 8 0.00E+00 6.68E - 07 2.25E -06 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205 -99 -2 12 0.00E+00 4.99E - 06 1.60E -05 6 0.00E+00 7.90E -07 3.86E - 06 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 191 -24 -2 9 0.00E+00 2.62E - 06 7.78E -06 4 0.00E+00 1.66E -04 8.29E - 04 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207 -08 -9 6 0.00E+00 3.07E - 06 1.19E -05 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Chrysene 218 - 01 -9 10 0.00E+00 3.59E - 06 9.71E -06 7 0.00E+00 1.46E -04 6.98E - 04 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 53 - 70 -3 7 0.00E+00 4.12E - 07 1.23E -06 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Flu oranthene 206 -44 -0 13 9.84E -07 8.66E - 05 2.41E -04 14 5.72E - 06 8.48E -04 3.14E - 03 Fluorene 86 - 73 - 7 14 2.79E -06 8.05E - 05 2.65E -04 12 4.20E - 06 4.69E -04 2.14E - 03 Indeno(1,2,3 -cd)pyrene 193 -39 -5 9 0.00E+00 5.04E - 07 1.60E -06 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 N aphthalene 91 -20 -3 15 4.03E -05 3.04E - 04 5.68E -04 15 1.42E - 04 8.15E -02 4.05E - 01 Phenanthrene 85-01 -8 15 7.61E -06 2.11E - 04 5.13E -04 15 1.58E - 05 4.36E -03 1.96E - 02 Pyrene 129 - 00 - 0 13 7.05E -07 4.89E - 05 1.53E -04 10 6.38E - 06 9.62E -04 3.98E - 03

## 20

**Table 7** **. Ca lculations for Conversion Factors**  Ne w an d Ex isting Chi p Dry er -O rgani c HA Ps( lim it isb ui lt into emission fa ctor...se e 9- company te st re sults summary) 1 ton 1 kg 1 Mg 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 1. 00E- 03 yea r 1 Mg 1, 000 kg 1 1 1 1 1 Ne w an d Ex isting Chi p Dry er -D/ F ( lim it = 2. 5 mi crograms TEQ/me gagram feed ) 1 ton 2. 5 mi crograms 1 gram 1 pound 1 ton 1 Mg 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 2. 50E- 12 yea r 1 me gagram feed 1, 000, 000 mi crogram 454 gram 2000 pound 1. 102 ton 1 1

1 ton 0. 3 lb 1 ton 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 1. 50E- 04 yea r 1 ton offeed 2, 000 pounds 1 1 1 1 1

1 ton 1. 5 lb 1 ton 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 7. 50E- 04 yea r 1 ton offeed 2, 000 pounds 1 1 1 1 1

1 ton 1 kg 1 Mg 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 1. 00E- 03 yea r 1 Mg 1, 000 kg 1 1 1 1 1

Ne w an d Scrap dry er

/dela cque ri ng/decoati ng ki ln - D/ F (limit= 0. 25 mi crograms TEQ/me gagram feed ) 1 ton 0. 25 mi crograms 1 gram 1 pound 1 ton 1 Mg 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 2. 50E- 13 yea r 1 me gagram feed 1, 000, 000 mi crogram 454 gram 2000 pound 1. 102 ton 1 1

Swea t fur na ce -D/ F (limit = 0. 8 N g/dsc m @ 11%O 2)

1 ton 148, 416 dscf 0. 8 Ng 1 dsc m 1 gram 1 pound 1 ton Conversi on fa ctor = 3. 70E- 12 yea r 1 ton 1 dsc m 35. 3 dscf 1, 000, 000, 000 Ng 454 grams 2000 pounds Ne w an d Ex isting Scrap Dry er /de la cque ri ng/decoati ng k iln i f afte rb urne r has a re si dence time ofat l ea st 1s econd an d ope rate s at a te mpera ture of at l ea st 1400 deg F- Organ icHA Ps (limiti s buit into emission fa ctor...se e 9 co mpany te st re sul ts) Ne w an d Ex isting Scrap Dry er /de la cque ri ng/decoati ng k iln i f afte rb urne r has a re si dence time ofat l ea st 1s econd an d ope rate s at a te mpera ture of at l ea st 1400 deg F- HC l (lim it= 1. 50 l b/ton offeed) Ne w an d Ex isting Scrap Dry er /de la cque ri ng/decoati ng k iln i f afte rb urne r has a re si dence time ofat l ea st 1s econd an d ope rate s at a te mpera ture of at l ea st 1400 deg F- P M ( lim it = 0. 30 l b/ton of feed )

## 21

Sc rap Shre dder

- P M ( lim it = 0. 01 g r/dscf) 1 scf 0. 01 grai ns 1 pound 1 ton 1440 minutes 365 day 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 3. 75E- 04 mi nute 1 dscf 7000 grai ns 2000 pounds 1 day 1 year 1 1

``` Ne w an d Ex isting dross-only furnace - P M ( lim it = 0. 30 l b/ton of feed )

1 ton 0. 3 lb 1 ton 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 1. 50E- 04 yea r 1 ton offeed 2, 000 pounds 1 1 1 1 1

Ne w an d Ex isting in-line fluxer HCl ( lim it= 0. 04 l b/ton of feed ) 1 ton 0. 04 lb 1 ton 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 2. 00E- 05 yea r 1 ton offeed 2, 000 pounds 1 1 1 1 1 Ne w an d Ex isting in-line fluxer P M (lim it= 0. 01 l b/ton of feed) 1 ton 0. 01 lb 1 ton 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 5. 00E- 06 yea r 1 ton offeed 2, 000 pounds 1 1 1 1 1

Ne w an d exist in g Group I me lt in g/hol di ng f ur nace ( proces si ng onl y cl ea n charge ) - PM( lim it= 0. 80 l b/ton of feed )

1 ton 0. 8 lb 1 ton 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 4. 00E- 04 yea r 1 ton offeed 2, 000 pounds 1 1 1 1 1 Ne w an d exist in g Group I me lt in g/hol di ng f ur nace ( proces si ng onl y cl ea n charge ) - HCl ( lim it= 0. 40 l b/ton of feed)

1 ton 0. 4 lb 1 ton 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 2. 00E- 04 yea r 1 ton offeed 2, 000 pounds 1 1 1 1 1

## 22

Ne w an d exist in g Group I f urnace P M ( lim it= 0. 40 l b/ton off eed)

1 ton 0. 4 lb 1 ton 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 2. 00E- 04 yea r 1 ton offeed 2, 000 pounds 1 1 1 1 1 Ne w an d exist in g Group I f urnace P M ( lim it= 0. 40 l b/ton off eed)

1 ton 0. 4 lb 1 ton 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 2. 00E- 04 yea r 1 ton offeed 2, 000 pounds 1 1 1 1 1 Ne w an d exist in g Group I f urnace D/ F ( lim it= 15. 0 m ic rograms TEQ/me gagram feed)

1 ton 15 mi crograms 1 gram 1 pound 1 ton 1 Mg 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 1. 50E- 11 yea r 1 me gagram feed 1, 000, 000 mi crogram 454 gram 2000 pound 1. 102 ton 1 1

Ne w an d exist in g Group I f urnace w it h only cl ea n charge P M ( lim it= 0. 40 l b/ton of feed )

1 ton 0. 4 lb 1 ton 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 2. 00E- 04 yea r 1 ton offeed 2, 000 pounds 1 1 1 1 1 Ne w an d exist in g Group I f urnace w it h only cl ea n charge HCl ( lim it= 0. 40 l b/ton of feed)

1 ton 0. 4 lb 1 ton 1 1 1 1 1 Conversi on fa ctor = 2. 00E- 04 yea r 1 ton offeed 2, 000 pounds 1 1 1 1 1

## 23

**Table 8**  **. Conversion Factor**  **Summary Equipment**  **Pollutant Conversion Factor**  **( allowable**  **tons of**  **pollutant per ton of feed**  **at the**  **regulatory**

**limit , except where noted)**  Thermal Chip Dryer THC 1.00E - 03 Thermal C hip Dryer D/F 2.50E - 12 Scrap Dryer/delacquering/decoating kiln PM 1.50E - 04 Scrap Dryer/delacquering/decoating kiln HCl 7.50E - 04 Scrap Dryer/delacquering/decoating kiln THC 1.00E - 03 Scrap Dryer/delacquering/decoating kiln D/F 2.50E - 13 Sweat furnace D/F 3.70E - 12 Aluminum Scrap Shredder PM 3.75E - 04 * Dross -only furnace PM 1.50E - 04 In - line fluxer HCl 2.00E - 05 In - line fluxer PM 5.00E - 06 Group 1 melting/holding furnace (processing only clean charge) PM 4.00E - 04 Group 1 melting/holding furnace (proces sing only clean charge) HCl 2.00E - 04 Group 1 Furnace

— Handling other than clean charge PM 2.00E - 04 Group 1 Furnace

— Handling other than clean charge HCl 2.00E - 04 Group 1 Furnace

— Handling other than clean charge D/F 1.50E - 11 Group 1 Furnace

—Clean charge only PM 2.00E - 04 Group 1 Furnace

—Clean charge only HCl 2.00E - 04 

### * Scrap shredder conversion factor is in tons of emissions per dry standard cubic foot per minute of stack gas flow.

## 24

**Table 9. Example of Allowable Emissions Calculations**  **RTI Number**  **Po llutant**  **Equipment Maximum**  **Capacity**

**(TPY) 1**  **Conversion**

**Factor 2**  **HAP**

**Concentration 3**  **Allowable Emissions**  **(TPY)** 409 Antimony Group 1 Furnace Handling Other than Clean Charge 32760 x 2.00E - 04 x 18.6/1E+06 = 1.22E - 04 409 HCl Group 1 Furnace Handling Other tha n Clean Charge 32760 x 2.00E - 04 = 6.55 409 D/F as 2,3,7,8 -

TCDD TEQ Group 1 Furnace Handling

Other than Clean Charge 32760 x 1.50E - 11 = 4.91E - 07 276 Acrylonitrile Thermal Chip Dryer 21600 x 1.00E - 03 x 9.89E - 04 = 2.14 E - 02 276 Acenaphthene Thermal Chip Dryer 21600 x 1.00E - 03 x 9.23E - 06 = 1.99E - 04 

### 1 Maximum capacity values are from all

-company ICR response s . 2 Conversion factors are from Table 8 . 3 HAP concentrations are from nine

-com pany testing ICR (see Table 5 for metallic HAPs, and Table 6 for organic HAPs).



## Table **1 0**  **. Example of**  **Actual Emissions Calculations RTI**  **Number Pollutant**  **Equipment Allowable**  **Emissions (TPY) 1**  **Reported Emissions/**  **Limit 2**  **Production/**

**Maximum Capacity** 

**3 Actual Emissions** 

**(TPY)** 409 Antimony Group 1 Furnace Handling Other than Clean Charge 1.22E - 04 x 0.052/0.4 x 1235/32760 = 5.98E - 07 409 HCl Group 1 Furnace Handling Other than Clean Charge 6.55 x 0.037/0.4 x 1235/32760 = 2.28E - 02 409 D/F as 2,3,7,8 -TCDD

TEQ Group 1 Furnace Handling Other than Clean Charge 4.91E - 07 x 0.48/15 x 1235/32760 = 5.92E - 10 276 Acrylonitrile Thermal Chip Dryer 2.14 E - 02 x 0. 022/0.8 x 6953/21600 = 1.89 E - 04 276 Acenaphthene Thermal Chip Dryer 1.99 E - 04 x 0. 022/0.8 x 6953/21600 = 1.76E - 0 6 

### 1 See T able 9 for allowable emissions. 2 Reported emissions are from ICR responses. Emissions limits are from the standards (see Table 4). 3 Production values for latest year are from the ICR responses. Maximum production capacities are also from ICR responses.

## 25

**Table 11**  **. Default Pollutant Emission Factors**  **Pollutant Equipment**  **Emission rate during testing**  **Rule limits Units**  **1 Fraction,**  **test/standard** Dioxin/Furans Group I furnace handling other than clean charge 2.16 15 ug/Mg 0.144

Delacquering/decoating kiln 1.34 5 ug/Mg 0.269 Chip dryer 0.277 2.5 ug/Mg 0.111 Sweat Furnace 0.35 0.8 ng/dscm 0.438 PM Group I furnace handling other than clean charge 0.184 0.4 lb/ton 0.460

Group I furnace clean charge only 0.165 0.8 lb/ton 0.206 Delacquering/decoating kiln 0.0390 0.3 lb/ton 0.130 Scrap shredder 0.00757 0.01 gr /dscf 0.757 Average N/A N/A N/A 0.388 HCl Group I furnace handling other than clean charge 0.0864 0.4 lb/ton 0.216

Group I furnace handling only clean charge 0.144 0.4 lb/ton 0.360 Delacquering/decoating kiln 0.259 1.5 lb/ton 0.173 Average N/A N/A N/A 0.266 THC Delacquering/decoating kiln 0.0485 0.2 lb/ton 0.243

Chip dryer 0.201 0.8 lb/ton 0.251 

### 1 Units for emission rate during testing are the same as the units for the rule limits. 

## Table **12 . Default Capacity Factors**  **Equipment Capacity**  **Factor (Actual production versus production capacity** **)** Group I furnace handling only clean charge 0.493 Group I furnace handling other than clean charge 0.467 Sweat Furnace 0.412 Delacquering/decoating kiln 0.370 Chip dryer 0.342 Scrap Shredder 0.317 Ave rage 0.400

## 26

**Table 1 3**  **. Allowable and Actual D/F Emissions, Major Sources RTI**  **Number Facility**  **Name TEQ Dioxin/Furan Emissions (TPY)**  **Allowable Emissions**  **Actual Emissions**  120 Crestwood Metal Company 8.18E - 09 4.86E - 09 195A Alcoa, Inc. (North plant) 2.17 E - 06 1.55E - 08 195B Alcoa, Inc. (South plant) 7.27E - 06 6.47E - 08 198 Novelis Corporation 5.99E - 08 6.09E - 12 199 Southwire Co 2.25E - 06 2.25E - 06 200 Aleris Rolled Products, Inc. 6.89E - 06 6.94E - 07 207 Alcoa Inc. 8.96E - 06 7.24E - 07 211 Hydro Aluminum W ells - Monett 1.49E - 06 5.55E - 08 224 JWAluminum Company 4.92E - 07 8.11E - 08 228 Nichols Aluminum Casting 1.57E - 05 1.29E - 06 232 Aleris Recycling, Inc/Aleris Specification Alloys, Inc. 1.03E - 06 2.66E - 08 260 Aleris Specification Alloys, Inc. 5.51E - 06 2.45E - 07 26 1 Alcoa Inc. - Wa rrick Operations 3.45E - 05 1.58E - 07 269 Novelis Corporation 1.11E - 05 1.14E - 06 270 Alcoa Massena Operations (West Plant) 1.49E - 06 9.47E - 07 272 Alumax of SC, Incorporated 1.12E - 06 5.63E - 11 273 JWAluminum Co 1.64E - 06 3.14E - 07 274 Aluminu m Co. of America - Wenatchee Wo rks 1.69E - 06 9.66E - 09 276 Mercury Marine - Fond Du Lac Complex 2.70E - 08 3.55E - 09 284 Alumax Mill Products, Inc. 1.39E - 06 1.56E - 07 288 Alumax Mill Products Inc. 6.75E - 06 4.48E - 07 289 Alcoa Mill Products - San Antonio 1.99E - 06 1.04E - 08 291 Sapa Extrusion 1.48E - 06 7.30E - 08 292 Wi lliam L. Bonnell Co., Inc. 5.81E - 07 3.06E - 08 294 Novelis Corporation 5.18E - 06 1.35E - 06 298a Wi se Alloys LLC -Alloys Reclamation Plant 2.93E - 06 7.02E - 08 299 Wi lliam L. Bonnell Company, Inc.(The) 8. 75E - 07 5.73E - 09 303 Aleris Specifiation Alloys, Inc. 1.15E - 06 8.02E - 07 305 Reynolds Foil Inc, dba reynolds Consumer Products

Company 2.22E - 06 4.88E - 12 324 Aleris Recycling 5.25E - 07 1.09E - 08 335 Jupiter Aluminum Corporation 2.01E - 06 1.41E - 08 336 Superi or Aluminum Alloys 3.74E - 06 9.08E - 07 338 Recycling Services of Indiana 6.43E - 07 1.95E - 09 341 Aluminum Recovery Technologies, Inc. 8.66E - 07 2.72E - 13 344 J.L. French Corp 8.54E - 07 1.06E - 09 349 Aleris Recycling, Inc. 2.42E - 06 3.54E - 07 351 Logan Aluminum 8.99E - 07 2.01E - 12 352 Owl's Head Alloys, Inc 3.98E - 07 2.22E - 07 363 Aleris Recycling 8.40E - 07 9.54E - 09 375 Aluminum Shapes, L.L.C. 1.97E - 06 7.61E - 10 389 Aleris Recycling 2.64E - 06 5.87E - 07

## 27

**RTI Number**  **Facility Name**  **TEQ Dioxin/Furan Emissions (TPY) Allowable**  **Emissions Actual**  **Emissions** 395 Sapa Extrusions 2.66E - 06 2.08E - 06 409 Intalco Aluminum Corp Ferndale 2.46E - 07 5.93E - 10 415 J. L. French Corp. 1.98E - 06 1.84E - 07 416 J. L. French Corp. 3.01E - 08 1.51E - 08 421 Alcan Rolled Products, L.L.C. 9.99E - 06 1.58E - 07

**Grand Total 1.54E**  **- 04**  **1.44E -** **05**

## 28

**Table 1 4**  **. Allowable and Actual D/F Emissions, Area Sour ces** 

**RTI Number Facility**  **Name TEQ Dioxin/Furan Emissions (TPY)**  **Allowable Emissions**  **Actual Emissions**  2 SMA- Mayfield Salvage Co. 6.33E - 09 2.54E - 10 7 Ellis Metals 7.33E - 09 5.06E - 09 11 Imperial Aluminum - Scottsboro 6.18E - 07 2.05E - 08 17 Livingston Pecan & Metal Inc. 1.85E - 10 1.62E - 10 18 Metro Scrap Metals, Inc. 9.25E - 09 5.91E - 10 20 Davis Iron & Metal 2.31E - 09 9.47E - 10 23 Amcep Metals Company 1.03E - 09 4.34E - 10 25 Thorock Metals Company Inc. 1.35E - 07 7.99E - 10 39 Al'S Pick N Pull, Inc. 3.46E - 09 7.48E - 1 0 50 Dittmer's Recycling 1.22E - 08 1.59E - 10 53 Tournier's Recycling Inc. 1.22E - 08 1.81E - 10 55 Buck's Auto Recycling 3.89E - 11 3.40E - 11 56 B. G. Salvage 1.85E - 10 6.67E - 11 63 Nikkei MC Aluminum America, Inc 6.72E - 08 1.39E - 09 65 United Tranz Core LLC 3.46 E - 09 1.18E - 09 68 Transmetco, Inc. 2.10E - 07 9.90E - 09 71 Metal Source LLC 2.03E - 08 1.10E - 08 72 Heartland Aluminum 4.29E - 08 3.21E - 08 73 Rays Metal Depot 4.63E - 09 1.67E - 09 74 Arnett Automotive 1.44E - 08 7.38E - 12 76 Donham Company 9.72E - 09 8.51E - 09 80 Cen ter Street Auto 1.85E - 10 1.30E - 10 83 Middleboro Recycling 1.62E - 08 9.47E - 10 85 Maryland Recycle Company 8.10E - 09 2.92E - 09 87 Montgomery Scrap 4.63E - 09 9.96E - 10 89 AM P Recycling Inc. 1.73E - 08 2.96E - 09 91 Kaiser Aluminum Fabricated Products, LLC 9.61E - 0 7 8.64E - 10 93 Ron Rehnelt Salvage 7.29E - 09 4.05E - 11 95 Mankato Iron & Metal Company 1.62E - 08 6.57E - 09 97 New Ulm Steel & Recycling, Inc. 6.89E - 09 1.49E - 09 101 Commercial Metals Company 2.59E - 08 1.65E - 08 112 We ber Auto And Truck Parts Corp. 1.15E - 09 1. 08E - 10 117 N. H. Kelman, Inc. 1.21E - 08 6.38E - 09 118 Metalico Aluminum Recovery 4.00E - 07 7.95E - 08 124 Luffman Metal Company 4.05E - 09 2.02E - 11 126 G - Cor Automotive 4.86E - 08 1.75E - 08 134 Aluminum W heel Technologies, Inc. 2.74E - 09 3.72E - 13 135 Staker All oys 1.85E - 09 8.39E - 10

## 29

**RTI Number Facility**  **Name TEQ Dioxin/Furan Emissions (TPY)**  **Allowable Emissions**  **Actual Emissions**  136 City W ide Towing And Auto Wrecking 9.92E - 09 0.00E+00 138 Diver- Steel City Auto Crushers 1.20E - 09 5.42E - 10 141 Yaffe Iron & Metal Co., Inc. 2.43E - 08 8.76E - 09 145 Assad Iron & Metals, Inc. 3.27E - 08 1.02E - 09 154 Reading Alloys I nc. - Robesonia 7.09E - 08 9.54E - 09 156 Pennex Aluminum Company 5.62E - 07 4.45E - 07 164 Most, Inc. - Jackson 9.85E - 07 2.44E - 07 165 MD Recycling, Inc. 7.22E - 07 3.66E - 08 167 Tennessee Aluminum Processors, Inc. 7.30E - 07 6.95E - 08 169 Valley Recycling 5.55E - 09 1.54E - 09 173 Bishop Engine And Automotive 1.55E - 08 2.27E - 09 190 Karl Schmidt Unisia, Inc. 1.37E - 08 1.49E - 13 191 Miller Compressing Co 1.00E - 07 2.08E - 11 196 Smelter Service Corp. 1.30E - 06 2.51E - 07 203 Kaiser Aluminum Fabricated Products, LLC 1.58E - 06 5.65E - 08 210 Golden Aluminum Inc. 5.16E - 07 6.20E - 09 212 Halna, Inc. 4.80E - 07 3.85E - 08 213 Custom Alloy Scrap Sales, Inc. 1.08E - 07 1.58E - 08 222 Vista Metals Corporation 1.37E - 07 3.08E - 09 225 Alcoa Forgings 2.25E - 07 3.41E - 08 231 Aleris Specification Al loys, Inc. 1.59E - 06 2.23E - 09 248 Aluminum One 6.65E - 07 1.96E - 08 252 Beck Aluminum Alloys 4.91E - 07 1.92E - 09 253 Aleris Recycling, Inc. 7.20E - 07 2.52E - 08 255 Kaiser Aluminum Fabricated Products, LLC 7.50E - 07 7.82E - 11 256 Hydro Aluminum 9.92E - 07 9.54E - 08 257 Scepter, Inc. 8.04E - 07 1.22E - 07 258 GMPowertrain Bedford Facility 8.32E - 08 3.96E - 09 278 Trialco, Inc. 6.30E - 07 7.47E - 08 279 Allied Metal Co. 4.50E - 07 7.03E - 08 282 Sapa Extrusions, L.L.C. 5.14E - 07 9.89E - 09 302 Tennessee Aluminum Processors, Inc. 6.57E - 07 4.00E - 07 306 Imsamet of Arizona 4.50E - 07 2.38E - 08 307 Custom Alloy Light Metals 7.36E - 07 8.40E - 08 310 TST, Inc. 9.30E - 07 2.49E - 07 312 Kaiser Aluminum & Chem Corp. 9.71E - 07 4.96E - 08 314 Dionisio Metal and Iron, Inc. 4.44E - 10 2.59E - 11 316 Metal Industries, Inc. 1.44E - 07 1.21E - 07 318 Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc 4.68E - 07 4.05E - 07

## 30

**RTI Number Facility**  **Name TEQ Dioxin/Furan Emissions (TPY)**  **Allowable Emissions**  **Actual Emissions**  322 Aleris Recycling 4.10E - 07 5.03E - 08 329 KB Cores - Kankakee 1.11E - 08 4.00E - 09 339 Aleris Recycling - Wa bash Operations 4.58E - 07 6.16E - 08 345 Kentucky Smelting Technology, Inc. 1.20E - 06 3.41E - 09 347 Hydro Aluminum - Louisville 9.74E - 07 9.74E - 07 348 Audubon Metals, L.L.C. 8.70E - 09 7.21E - 11 354 Electro Cycle, Inc. 7.58E - 07 3.59E - 09 364 Continental Aluminum 7.39E - 07 2.67E - 07 369 Most, Inc. - T roy 6.18E - 07 1.04E - 07 372 Taber Metals Gulfport L.P. 6.15E - 07 2.48E - 08 376 State Metal Industries, Inc. 5.60E - 07 2.09E - 07 381 Scepter Inc. - Seneca Falls Operations 4.60E - 07 6.22E - 08 384 GNWAluminum, Inc. 3.89E - 08 1.40E - 08 385 Quantum Metals 3.93E - 09 4.35E - 10 392 Aleris Recycling, Inc. 7.88E - 07 4.49E - 07 394 Ritchey Metals Co., Inc. - Hendersonville Plant 4.50E - 09 9.71E - 10 398 Berman Brothers Iron & Metal 4.28E - 07 9.46E - 08 401 Scepter, Inc. 7.88E - 07 8.65E - 08 404 Norandal USA, Inc. 3.38E - 06 1.31E - 07 405 Sapa Extrusions, Inc. 7.25E - 07 1.05E - 08 407 Aleris Rolled Products, Inc. 1.44E - 06 1.35E - 07 408 Kaiser Aluminum W ashington 4.58E - 06 6.45E - 07 412 B & B Metals Processing Co. 1.33E - 07 1.68E - 09 420 Beck Aluminum Racine 3.94E - 07 3.54E - 10 422 Aleris Recycling, Inc. 4.86E - 07 7.96E - 08 423 Aleris Recycling Bens Run LLC 3.94E - 07 4.47E - 08

**Grand Total 4.28E**  **- 05**  **6.67E -** **06**