alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  the
undersigned  officers of Newgold,  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of Newgold on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

         (1)      the 10-QSB  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the   information   contained  in  the  10-QSB  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Newgold.

                            NEWGOLD, INC.


Dated:  June 19, 2006       /s/ SCOTT DOCKTER
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Scott Dockter, President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  June 19, 2006       /s/ JAMES KLUBER
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            James Kluber, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE V

AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

CHAPTER 5

POLICE COOPERATION

Article 89

(ex Article 32 TEU)

(ex Article 32 TEU)

The Council, acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure, shall lay down the conditions and limitations under which the competent authorities of the Member States referred to in Articles 82 and 87 may operate in the territory of another Member State in liaison and in agreement with the authorities of that State. The Council shall act unanimously after consulting the European Parliament.

---
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 2.9 (c) of the 2022-2 Servicing Supplement dated as of March 29, 2022 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2022-2 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and GMF Leasing LLC in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from May 11, 2022 through December 31, 2022, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 3, 2023Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                       CAPSTEAD SECURITIES CORPORATION IV
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capstead Securities Corporation IV
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Andrew F. Jacobs, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 11, 2003                  By: /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBS
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Andrew F. Jacobs
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive
                                            Officer and President


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capstead Securities Corporation IV
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Phillip A. Reinsch, Senior Vice President - Control of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 11, 2003                  By: /s/ PHILLIP A. REINSCH
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Phillip A. Reinsch
                                            Senior Vice President - Control
2023 Administrative Committee for Pistachios Roster

Manager Chairperson

Bob Klein, Ph.D. Thomas Coleman

4938 E. Yale Avenue, Ste. 102 285 W Shaw Ave. Ste. 204

Fresno, CA 93727 Fresno, CA 93704

Telephone: (559) 255-6480, ext. 103 Telephone: (559) 222-1055

Fax: (559) 255-6485 Fax: (559) 222-1009

bobk@acpistachios.org tom@colemanfarming.com

Members Alternates Term Ends

Producer Representatives

District 1 - Southern California

Matthew Watte Jeff Nichols 2024

Tulare, CA Hanford, CA

Hiroki Hiura Majic Khabbaz 2024

Terra Bella, CA Thousand Oaks, CA

Brian L. Hauss Ron Marconi 2025

Fresno, CA Visalia, CA

Rudy T. Hernandez Vacancy 2025

San Luis Obispo, CA

District 2 - Central California

Thomas Coleman William Gleason 2024

Fresno, CA Fresno, CA

Zack Raven Brian Spain 2025

Kettleman City, CA Fresno, CA

Tobin Martin Analisa Lane 2025

Fresno, CA Fresno, CA

District 3 - Northern California

Nicholas Edsall Paul Takhar 2024

Woodland, CA Yuba City, CA
District 4 – Arizona and New Mexico

John L. Heuler Adam Kusmak 2025

Tucson, AZ Tularosa, NM

Handler Representatives

Position 1 Kirk Squire Harris Cohen 2025

Tulare, CA Terra Bella, CA

Position 2 Andrew Howe Joel Perkins 2024

Lost Hills, CA Tulare, CA

Public Representatives

Vacancy Christine Milgrom 2022

Fresno, CA
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e), and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i) and 37 CFR 404.7(b)(1)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, revocable license to the invention claimed in U.S. Patent No. 6,316,197, entitled “Method of Diagnosing of Exposure to Toxic Agents by Measuring Distinct Pattern in the Levels of Expression of Specific Genes,” issued on November 13, 2001, and foreign rights to Cascade Biotherapeutics, Inc., with its principal place of business at 4938 Hampden Lane #319, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-2914.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, MD 21702-5012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, Office of Research & Technology Applications, (301) 619-6664. For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808; both at telefax (301) 619-5034.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Anyone wishing to object to grant of this license can file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, within 15 days from the date of this publication. Written objections are to be filed with the Command Judge Advocate (see                     **ADDRESSES**                    ).                

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2013-00226 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1138 

To reauthorize the West Valley demonstration project, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2019 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. HIGGINS of New York) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the West Valley demonstration project, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. 

4 (a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 3(a) of the West 

5 Valley Demonstration Project Act (Public Law 96–368; 

6 42 U.S.C. 2021a note) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘$5,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

8 1981’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

9 2020 through 2026’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1138 IH

1 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the 

2 date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

3 shall submit to Congress a report that describes— 

4 (1) the volumes, origins, and types of radio5 active waste at the Western New York Service Cen6 ter in West Valley, New York; 

7 (2) what options have been identified for dis8 posal of each such type of radioactive waste; 

9 (3) what is known about the costs of, and time10 frames for, each such option; 

11 (4) the benefits and challenges of each such op12 tion, according to the State of New York and the 

13 Department of Energy; and 

14 (5) as of the date of enactment of this Act— 

15 (A) how much has been spent on the dis16 posal of radioactive waste associated with the 

17 demonstration project prescribed by section 

18 2(a) of the West Valley Demonstration Project 

19 Act; and 

20 (B) what volumes and types of radioactive 

21 waste have been disposed of from the Western 

22 New York Service Center. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 7379

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. AQUABEUS MOORE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 2:15

- cr - 00386

- RMG

- 2 )

Submitted : April 28, 2022 Decided: June 3, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Aquabeus Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7379 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/03/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Aquabeus Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Moore’s motion. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied , 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we deny Moore’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States
v. Moore , No. 2:15

- cr - 00386

- RMG

- 2 (D.S.C. Sept. 13 , 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7379 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/03/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.A11
                                                                  --------------

                          Business Ethics and Conduct
                          ---------------------------

The successful business operation and reputation of Dixon Ticonderoga Company is
built upon the principles of fair dealing and ethical  conduct of our employees.
Our reputation for integrity and excellence  requires careful  observance of the
spirit  and  letter  of all  applicable  laws  and  regulations,  as  well  as a
scrupulous regard for the highest standards of conduct and personal integrity.

The  continued  success  of Dixon  Ticonderoga  Company  is  dependent  upon our
customers' trust and we are dedicated to preserving that trust.  Employees owe a
duty to Dixon Ticonderoga Company,  its customers,  and shareholders to act in a
way that will merit the continued trust and confidence of the public.

Dixon  Ticonderoga  Company will comply with all applicable laws and regulations
and  expects its  directors,  officers,  and  employees  to conduct  business in
accordance  with the  letter,  spirit,  and intent of all  relevant  laws and to
refrain from any illegal, dishonest, or unethical conduct.

In general,  the use of good judgment,  based on high ethical  principles,  will
guide you with respect to lines of  acceptable  conduct.  If a situation  arises
where it is  difficult  to  determine  the proper  course of action,  the matter
should be discussed  openly with your  immediate  supervisor  and, if necessary,
with the Company's Human Resources Department for advice and consultation.

Compliance with this policy of business ethics and conduct is the responsibility
of every Dixon Ticonderoga  Company employee.  Disregarding or failing to comply
with this  standard of business  ethics and conduct  could lead to  disciplinary
action, up to and including possible termination of employment.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In re Galveston County Judge Mark Henry, Galveston County 

Commissioner Ryan Dennard, Galveston County Commissioner Joe 

Giusti, Galveston County Commissioner Stephen Holmes, and 

Galveston County Commissioner Ken Clark, in Their Official 

Capacities as the Galveston County Commissioners Court

Appellate case number: 01-14-00820-CV

Trial court: 56th District Court of Galveston County

Date motion filed: February 19, 2015

Party filing motion: Relators

The en banc court has unanimously voted to deny relators’ motion for en banc 

reconsideration. It is ordered that the motion is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting for the Court*

* En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, 

Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd; Justice Massengale, joined by Justice Brown,

concurring in denial of en banc reconsideration.

Date: April 14, 2015
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wniteb ~tate~ <!Court of ~eaI~ 

for tbe jf eberaI <!Circuit 

CHARLES A. MOTT, 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

2012-7083 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in case no.1O-1585, Judge Alan G. 

Lance, Sr. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

Charles A. Mott moves for leave to proceed in forma 

paupens. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 
MOTTv.DVA 

The motion is granted. 

MAR 09 2012 

Date 

cc: Robert P. Walsh, Esq. 

Jeanne A. Davidson, Esq. 

s21 

FOR THE COURT 

lsI Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

2 

ALED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

MAR 092012 

JAN IIOIIIIAIY 

WIll
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 44 

Disapproving the final rule of the Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration titled ‘‘Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. LEVIN of Michigan (for himself, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

HIGGINS of New York, Ms. WILD, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. GREEN of Texas, 

Mr. NADLER, Ms. MOORE, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. TLAIB, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. 

DESAULNIER, Ms. BONAMICI, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mrs. 

DAVIS of California, Mr. POCAN, Ms. HILL of California, Mr. COHEN, 

Mrs. MCBATH, and Ms. STEVENS) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the final rule of the Occupational Safety and 

Health Administration titled ‘‘Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the final rule issued by the Oc4 cupational Safety and Health Administration titled 

5 ‘‘Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses’’ (84 Fed. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 44 IH 

1 Reg. 380) published on January 25, 2019, and such rule 

2 shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Exhibit
32.1





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Finlay
Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2009
(the “Report”) that:





1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the SecuritiesExchange
      Act of 1934; and


2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financialcondition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
June 16, 2009


/s/ Arthur E.
      ReinerArthur
      E. ReinerChairman,
      President and Chief
                Executive
      Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,588,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,828,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (70,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     51,104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,398,288
<PP&E>                                      24,707,550
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,396,414)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,393,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,016,486
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        277
<COMMON>                                       122,367
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,711,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,393,914
<SALES>                                      1,608,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,770,586
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  883,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               406,307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             5,050,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             321,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,516,730)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,992,547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (1,432,973)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,170,302)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.43)
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00555-CV

DENVER ENERGY EXPLORATION, LLC,

Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, Inc.,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 380,714

Honorable Irene Rios, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of 

this appeal are taxed against Appellant.

SIGNED January 8, 2014.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
(^/,'frSD^z

April 3rd, aois

^oo fm l£5

KosWr^V^W^O RECEIVED IM

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

flU W», C-W APR 082015

5upatvM. CouA Mi'ivxji Abel Acosta,Clerk

cW fA^A iU 05 XA* ^ kn^o if ^ *W

ju\c£f«-»iy

Mi

Cc: Wil
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40953

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH NOVAK,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-35-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Joseph Novak has moved to

withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.