alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Dated: October 27, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/    JEFFREY
KATZENBERG            
|                        |  |  |  | Jeffrey Katzenberg                   
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|                        |  | 
|Dated: October 27, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/    LEWIS W.
COLEMAN              
|                        |  |  |  | Lewis W. Coleman                     
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daryl Lattimore, Appellant.

—Appeals from two judgments of the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.), rendered March 3, 1989, convicting defendant upon his pleas of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and attempted rape in the first degree.

Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that the sentences he received were harsh and excessive. We disagree. The 5- to 15-year prison sentence he received upon his guilty plea to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree was well within the statutory guidelines (Penal Law § 70.00 [2] [b]; [3] [b]) and the plea was made in full satisfaction of a three-count indictment. Furthermore, no promises were made to him with respect to the sentence he would receive for that crime. As to the *IVi*to 4Vi-year prison sentence he received for his conviction of attempted rape in the first degree, defendant not only received the most lenient sentence possible (Penal Law § 70.02 [3] [b]; [4]), but he pleaded guilty to that crime knowing that he would receive the sentence ultimately imposed, including the fact that it would be consecutive to the sentence imposed for the drug conviction. Under these circumstances, we find no abuse by County Court in sentencing defendant *(see, People v Dean,*155 AD2d 774, 775, *lv denied*75 NY2d 812; *People v McManus,*124 AD2d 305).

Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1137 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1137

  To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to repeal the 
    authority relating to reprogramming during national emergencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2019

Mr. Garamendi (for himself, Mr. Cisneros, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Bera, Mr. 
Gomez, Mr. Takano, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Rouda, Mr. Carbajal, Mr. Huffman, 
 Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Vargas, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Soto, Ms. Lofgren, Ms. 
 Matsui, Mr. Serrano, Mrs. Napolitano, Ms. Plaskett, and Mr. Harder of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to repeal the 
    authority relating to reprogramming during national emergencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REPROGRAMMING AUTHORITY.

    Section 923 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2293) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Counties Comprising Each Region and Federal Orders

December 2008

Prepared by:

 Market Administrator's Office

 Minneapolis, Minnesota

 May 2011

Arizona

F.O. 131

Pacific 

Northwest

F.O. 124

Central

F.O. 32

Upper

Midwest

F.O. 30

Southwest

F.O. 126 Southeast and Florida

F.O. 7 and 6

Appalachian

F.O. 5

Mideast

F.O. 33

Northeast

F.O. 1
EXHIBIT 4.3

DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE

US$39,010.97

In consideration of receiving a loan of US$39,010.97, the undersigned LONGBOW MINING CORP., of 699B Sierra Rose Drive, Reno, Nevada, USA, 89511, does hereby PROMISE TO PAY to ARCHER PACIFIC MANAGEMENT INC., of 141 - 757 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 1C1, the sum of US$39,010.97, without interest, payable on demand.

The undersigned and each endorser hereof waives demand and presentment for payment, notice of dishonour, notice of nonpayment and notice of this Promissory Note.

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, the 8th day of March, 2002.



	
/s/ "Kathy Wang"

Kathy Wang

Signature of Witness
	
/s/ "Ernest Cheung"

Ernest Cheung, Director

Longbow Mining Corp.
Exhibit 23.3





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Nos. 333-227117, 333-207296, 333-177433, 333-177432, 333-118681) on Form S-8 of Capital Southwest Corporation of our report dated May 10, 2019 relating to the financial statements of I-45 SLF LLC for the year ended March 31, 2019 included as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital Southwest Corporation for the year ended March 31, 2019





/s/ RSM US LLP





Chicago, Illinois


June 4, 2019
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

215) ll-K-(I)-28 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:55 AM Sheet 215 of 325 
P.2 

PlPi 

H-K-CI)-28 

IFCAM MODEL REVIEW. 

EEA, Inc. 

June 29, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-28
# C_2012326EN.01020101.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

PROTOCOL (No 34)

ON SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR GREENLAND

Sole Article

1.   The treatment on import into the Union of products subject to the common organisation of the market in fishery products, originating in Greenland, shall, while complying with the mechanisms of the internal market organisation, involve exemption from customs duties and charges having equivalent effect and the absence of quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent effect if the possibilities for access to Greenland fishing zones granted to the Union pursuant to an agreement between the Union and the authority responsible for Greenland are satisfactory to the Union.

2.   All measures relating to the import arrangements for such products, including those relating to the adoption of such measures, shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 43 of the Treaty establishing the European Union.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association
Members/State Street Collective Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Beth M. Halberstadt, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                                     /s/ Beth M. Halberstadt
                                                    ------------------------
                                                    Beth M. Halberstadt
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    November 14, 2003
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(b)

                        OPINION AND CONSENT OF ACTUARY
<PAGE>

               [Transamerica Life Insurance Company Letterhead]


April 10, 2002


Transamerica Life Insurance Company
4333 Edgewood Road NE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52499-0001

Re:   Atlas Portfolio Builder Variable Annuity
      Separate Account VA A
      Registration on Form N-4

Dear Sir/Madam:

With regard to the above registration statement, I have examined such documents
and made such inquiries as I have deemed necessary and appropriate, and on the
basis of such examination, have the following opinions:

Fees and charges deducted under the Atlas Portfolio Builder Variable Annuity
policies are those deemed necessary to appropriately reflect:

(1)   the expenses incurred in the acquisition and distribution of the policies,

(2)   the expenses associated with the development and servicing of the
      policies,

(3)   the assumption of certain risks arising from the operation and management
      of the policies and/or riders to the policy and that provides for a
      reasonable margin of profit.

Fees and charges assessed against the policy values in the variable account
include:

(i)   Service Charge and Administrative Charge

(ii)  Mortality and Expense Risk Fee (M&E)

(iii) Taxes (including premium and other taxes if applicable)

(iv)  Surrender Charges

(v)   Any applicable rider fees or charges
<PAGE>

Transamerica Life Insurance Company
April 10, 2002
Page 2


The magnitude of each of the individual charges listed above in (i) through (v)
is established in the pricing of the Atlas Portfolio Builder Variable Annuity,
to achieve a reasonable Return on Investment (ROI), which is within the range of
industry practice with respect to comparable variable annuity products.

Except by coincidence, it is not expected that actual charges assessed in a
given year would exactly offset actual expenses incurred. Acquisition expenses
(as well as major product and/or systems development expenses) are incurred "up
front" and recovered, with a reasonable profit margin, through future years'
charges. In addition, the company cannot increase certain charges under the
policies in the pricing process.

Therefore, in my opinion, the fees and charges deducted under the policies, in
the aggregate, are reasonable in relation to the services rendered, the expenses
expected to be incurred, and the risks assumed by the company.

I hereby consent to the use of this opinion, which is included as an Exhibit to
the registration statement.


   /s/ R. Gene Hauser
-----------------------------------------
R. Gene Hauser
Associate Actuary
Transamerica Life Insurance Company
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00097]



[[Page 1265]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-81,317]


Dana Holding Corporation; Power Technologies Group Division; 
Including On-Site Leased Workers From Manpower Milwaukee, WI; Notice of 
Revised Determination on Reconsideration

    On August 8, 2012, the Department of Labor issued a Notice of 
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration 
applicable to workers and former workers of Dana Holding Company, Power 
Technologies Group Division, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (subject firm). The 
worker group includes on-site leased workers from Manpower. The subject 
worker group includes workers engaged in activities related to the 
production of gaskets. The reconsideration investigation revealed that 
the subject workers do not produce exhausts.
    Section 222(a)(1) has been met because a significant number or 
proportion of the workers in the subject firm have become totally or 
partially separated, or are threatened with such separation.
    Based on information provided during the reconsideration 
investigation, the Department determines that worker separations at the 
subject firm are related to a shift in a portion of the production of 
gaskets (or like or directly competitive articles) to a foreign country 
and that the shift in the production of these articles contributed 
importantly to worker separations at the subject firm.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the additional facts obtained during the 
reconsideration investigation, I determine that workers of Dana Holding 
Company, Power Technologies Group Division, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, who 
were engaged in employment related to the production of gaskets, meet 
the worker group certification criteria under Section 222(a) of the 
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). In accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 19 
U.S.C. 2273, I make the following certification:

    All workers of Dana Holding Company, Power Technologies Group 
Division, including on-site leased workers from Manpower, Milwaukee, 
Wisconsin who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after February 8, 2011, through two years from the date of 
certification, and all workers in the group threatened with total or 
partial separation from employment on the date of certification 
through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of November, 2012.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2013-00097 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-81,635-01

IN RE JERAMIAH CLARK, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1299499-A IN THE 184TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Relator filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 184th District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

On July 9, 2014, we held his application in abeyance and ordered Respondent, the District

Clerk of Harris County, to file a response. On March 23, 2015, we received copies of the State’s

acknowledgment of receipt of Relator’s application, dated July 24, 2013, and an order designating

issues (ODI) the trial judge signed on September 11, 2013. This ODI was not timely entered and
2

interfered with Respondent’s duty to forward Relator’s application to this Court. TEX.CODE CRIM.

PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(c); Martin v. Hamlin, 25 S.W.3d 718, 719 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).

We conditionally grant Relator’s application for a writ of mandamus and direct Respondent

to immediately forward his habeas application to this Court. Following custom, we will issue the

writ only if Respondent fails to comply.

Filed: April 15, 2015

Do not publish
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1253 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 13507 Van Nuys Boulevard in Pacoima, California, as the ‘‘Ritchie Valens Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1253 EH

1 SECTION 1. RITCHIE VALENS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 13507 Van Nuys Boulevard in 

4 Pacoima, California, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Ritchie Valens Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ritchie Valens Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1253 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. in Pacoima, California, as the ‘‘Ritchie Valens al Service located at 13507 Van Nuys Boulevard
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00168]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8145]


Waiver and Certification of Statutory Provisions of Section 1003 
of Public Law 100-204 Regarding the Palestine Liberation Organization 
Office

    (U) Pursuant to the authority vested in me as Deputy Secretary of 
State, including by section 7086(b)(1) of the Department of State, 
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. 
L. 112-74, Div. I), as carried forward by the Continuing Appropriations 
Act, 2013, the Delegation of Authority in the President's Memorandum of 
July 21, 2010, and Department of State Delegation of Authority No. 245-
1, I hereby determine and certify that the Palestinians have not, since 
the date of enactment of that Act, obtained in the UN or any 
specialized agency thereof the same standing as member states or full 
membership as a state outside an agreement negotiated between Israel 
and the Palestinians, and waive the provisions of section 1003 of the 
Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987, Public Law 100-204, Title X.
    (U) This waiver shall be effective for a period of six months.
    (U) This determination shall be reported to the Congress promptly 
and published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: October 8, 2012.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-00168 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hardy Renaud, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Murray Mogel, J.), rendered on April 6, 1989, convicting defendant upon a plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree and sentencing defendant as a second violent predicate felon to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from *3Vi*to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

*530We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
Restricted Use Pesticide Recordkeeping Form

Name and Application Brand or EPA Registration Size of Area Rate Total Amount 

Certification Number Date* Product Name Number Treated Per Unit** Applied 

Additional Notes:

* date should include month, day and year ** rate per unit is not required by the Federal Pesticide Recordkeeping Regulations
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 15, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-525

Lower Tribunal No. 12-27546

________________

Daniel Calderon,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alberto Milian, Judge.

Daniel Calderon, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee. 

Before LAGOA, SALTER, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this
Court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See

Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). 

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we

reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters

an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach

record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief. 

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. 

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Geoffrey G. Meyers, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Manor Care, Inc. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period
            ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
            requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Geoffrey G. Meyers
Geoffrey G. Meyers
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
September 27, 2005
D. S., MOTHER OF A. M. AND
A. S., MINOR CHILDREN

,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN

AND FAMILIES

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3985

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. David M. Gooding, Judge

.

Crystal Mcbee Frusciante, Sunrise; Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville; David Paul Krupski, Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.