alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      22,316,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,059,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,279,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      61,196,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,178,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             101,395,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     34,229,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,941,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               101,395,000
<SALES>                                      9,457,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,824,000
<CGS>                                        7,927,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,927,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,108,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,267,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,522,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,087,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,404,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,736,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,140,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.18
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21

                          Subsidiaries


     Avcon Industries, Inc., a Kansas Corporation

     Butler National Services, Inc., a Florida Corporation,
     formerly Lauderdale Services, Inc.

     Butler National Engineers, Inc.,
     a Kansas Corporation, formerly HSD, Inc.

     Butler National Service Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

     Butler National, Inc., a Nevada Corporation

     Butler Temporary Services, Inc., a Missouri Corporation

     Woodson Avionics, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation

     Cansas International Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

     Valu Foods, Inc., a Kansas Corporation





<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                                     BNS Co.
                                     ------
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                         ------------------------------

Subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 2001, are as follows:
                                                            Percentage of
                                  Jurisdiction              Voting Power
                                       of                   Owned by the
         Name of Subsidiary       Incorporation              Registrant
         ------------------       -------------              -----------

BNS Co. (PH) Ltd.                  UK                             100%

Xygent Inc.                        Delaware                      /(1)/

Xygent srl                         Italy                         /(2)/

Xygent SARL                        France                        /(2)/

Xygent GmbH                        Germany                       /(3)/

Xygent (UK) Ltd.                   UK                            /(3)/

/(1)/  Owned 83.3% by BNS Co. and 16.7% by Hexagon Holdings, Inc.
/(2)/  Owned 1% by BNS Co. and 99% by Xygent Inc.
/(3)/  Owned 100% by Xygent Inc.
Order filed November 3, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00249

- CR

____________ ROY G. WALKER , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1395740



### ORDER

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this Court his desire to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).
Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 232nd District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with loca l procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before November 18, 2015 ;that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to

appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se b rief with this court within thirty days
of that date.

PER CURIAM
April 14, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOHN HUGHES HILL, JR., Appellant

NO. 14-14-00337-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Agricultural Marketing Service, Specialty Crops Program, Specialty Crops Inspection Division

This PATCH represents official guidance. This PATCH is scheduled to be incorporated into the 

document listed above. After incorporation into the document listed above this PATCH will 

become obsolete. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 

PATCH # 059 External Sprouts on Potatoes (October 15, 2020) 

SCI Division Inspection Series 

Page 1 of 1 

PATCH # 059

DOCUMENT: Potatoes Shipping Point and Market Inspection Instructions, April 2012 

REMARKS: The En Route or At Destination Scoring Guide for Sprouts (External) (C) on 

page 44 is revised to read as follows: 

Scoring Guide

Damage: 

When more than 5% of the potatoes in any lot have any sprout more than 1/2 inch in length, or 

When numerous individual and /or clusters of sprouts materially detract from the appearance of 

the potato. 

Serious damage (only score serious damage by sprouts for U.S. Commercial and U.S. No. 2 

grades): 

When more than 10% of the potatoes in any lot have any sprout more than 1 inch in length, or 

When numerous individual and/or clusters of sprouts seriously detract from the appearance of 

the potato.
=. west virginia department of environmental protection - SIGN-IN SHEET Public Hearing on proposed 2014 Division ofAir Quality Rules 45CSR8,45CSR14,45CSR16,45CSR18,45CSR19,45CSR25 and 45CSR34 July 8,2013,6:00 p.m. The Department of Environmental Protection asks forthe information below sothat agency staff may provide responses and information about decisions to you. The infomation you voluntarily provide on this sheet becomes partofthe public record related to this topic and may be released if requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Name (please print)

..Jp p&q.. .-,/. .. - - \ Address ,vm.~& - I Organization D? Phone E-mail CommentY/N
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00132-CV

Gaetan Pelletier and Pelletier Management and Consulting, LLC

v.

Victoria Air Conditioning, Ltd.

On Appeal from the

267th District Court of De Witt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16-09-23,901

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 24, 2021
391 A.2d 701

#### Commonwealth v. Tanner, Appellant.

Argued March 22, 1978.

Eugene Edw. J. Maier, for appellant; Flora L. Becker, Assistant District Attorney, and Edward G. Rendell, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
ALASKA SEAFOOD CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2013-0652

DCN: 00090CBI

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
My name is Eric Wendt and I am the Chief Science Officer for Green Leaf Labs, an accredited analytical chemistry laboratory located in Portland Oregon, who has been performing hemp and cannabis testing services since 2011. We have encountered a number of issues regarding hemp testing and consumer protection in Oregon that I believe are applicable to the Federal guidelines that will be implemented. I would like to discuss the following topics during the listening section:

- The discrepancy between testing for delta-9 THC vs THCA and total THC.
- Degradation of THCA into delta-9 THC during storage and transport. 

CBD concentrates and extracts produced from hemp that result in THC levels above 0.3%

Importance of representative sampling of hemp material and the variability of plants in a field. 

These are the topics I would like to comment on during the listening session. If you require a formal written statement please let me know. 

Eric Wendt

Green Leaf Labs
April 3, 2018

AMENDMENT NO. 1

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION 

FROZEN VEGETABLES – June 2017

The purpose of this amendment is for changes in the Commodity Specification for Frozen 

Vegetables:

• Add new package size for Whole Kernel Corn (12/2.5 pound) – for future purchase

• Add new package size for Green Beans (12/2 pound) – for future purchase

• Remove 3–way mixed vegetables from the specification

• Change tolerances and proportions of existing 4-way mixed vegetables

• Add material codes for diced and sliced carrots in to carrot requirements

Black is existing language and additions/changes are shown in blue below:

I. Individual Commodity Specifications

B. Frozen, Whole Kernel Corn

Net Weight

• 30 pounds per case

• 12/2.5 pound container (material code to be determined at a later date)

D. Frozen, Green Beans

 Net Weight 

• 30 pounds per case 

• 12/2 pound container (material code to be determined at a later date)

E. Frozen, Mixed Vegetables

Exceptions to the U.S. Standards for Grades of Frozen Mixed Vegetables

1. Proportions of Ingredients – 4 way mix (plus or minus 7 percent by weight).

a. 30 percent by weight carrots (diced style 3/8 to 1⁄2 inch cube).

b. 20 percent by weight green peas.

c. 20 percent by weight corn (sweet, golden or yellow, whole kernel corn).

d. 30 percent by weight cut style green beans (predominantly of 1/2 inch to 1-1/2 

inch cuts).

Specialty Crops 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Program Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Washington, DC 20250-0240
Frozen Vegetables WBSCM Primary Secondary 

Mixed Vegetables 

(4-way mix, 6/5 pound) 110871 7 15001 10871 5 1 07 15001 10871 2

F. Frozen, Carrots

Frozen Vegetables WBSCM Primary Container Secondary Container

Carrots Sliced (30 lb.) 100352 1 07 15001 00352 9

Carrots Sliced (30 lb.), 

Kosher 110064 1 07 15001 10064 8

Carrots Diced (30 lb.) 110480 1 07 15001 10480 4

Carrots Diced (12/2.5 

lb.) 110481 7 15001 10481 4 1 07 15001 10481 7

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
#### Barbara CELESTINE, Petitioner, v. The DISTRICT COURT FOR the FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, State of Colorado, Division 6, The Honorable Hunter D. Hardeman, District Judge, Respondent.

No. 80SA90.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

May 19, 1980.

J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, Denver, Kenneth Dresner, Deputy State Public Defender, Colorado Springs, for petitioner.

Hunter D. Hardeman, District Judge, Fourth Judicial District, Colorado Springs, pro se.

ERICKSON, Justice.

A petition for a writ of mandamus was sought after the defendant was denied a preliminary hearing. We issued a rule to show cause and now make that rule absolute.

The defendant, Barbara Celestine, was charged with child abuse. *See*sections 18— 6-401(1) and (7), C.R.S.1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8). Thereafter, she requested a preliminary hearing pursuant to Crim.P. 7(h)(1) and section 16-5-301, C.R.S.1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8). On the date scheduled for the hearing, the matter was continued on the basis of a plea agreement which called for the defendant to make an application for deferred sentencing. *See*section 16-7-A03, C.R.S.1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8). The application for deferred sentencing was made, but after the probation report was completed, the trial judge refused to accept the application for deferred sentencing.

Defense counsel then renewed his request for a preliminary hearing. The trial judge rejected the request on the grounds that the application for deferred sentencing constituted a waiver of the defendant’s right to a preliminary hearing. The record does not establish that a preliminary hearing was waived. The application for deferred sentencing does not constitute waiver of the right to a preliminary hearing.

Accordingly, the rule to show cause is made absolute and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 381ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF STARR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on February 4, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

America Amada Gonzalez and Jamie Christina Garza McRae, Appellant

V.

Jose Gilberto Pena, Et Ux., Appellee

No. 04-14-00048-CV and Tr. Ct. No. DC-10-359

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the issues raised by

the appellants regarding the trial court’s conclusions as to title ownership are

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION, and the judgment of the trial

court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellees recover their costs of this

appeal from appellants.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on April 15, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00048-CV

America Amada Gonzalez and Jamie Christina Garza McRae

v.

Jose Gilberto Pena, Et Ux.

(NO. DC-10-359 IN 381ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF STARR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

EXHIBIT TENDERED FOR ORAL

ARGUMENT

EXHIBIT TENDERED FOR ORAL

ARGUMENT

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

CLERK'S RECORD

MOTION FEE

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51

FEE

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

INDIGENT

FILING

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$25.00

$25.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$866.00

$10.00

$50.00

$20.00

$25.00

$100.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

JOSEPH VALE

DAVID JONES

MARGIL SANCHEZ

DAVID JONES

MARGIL SANCHEZ, JR.

DAVID JONES

MARGIL SANCHEZ

MARGIL SANCHEZ

N/A

MARGIL SANCHEZ

MARGIL SANCHEZ

N/A

MARGIL SANCHEZ, JR.

MARGIL SANCHEZ

MARGIL SANCHEZ

MARGIL SANCHEZ

MARGIL SANCHEZ

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this April 15, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) of Left Behind Games, Inc. for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, I, Troy A. Lyndon, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer and Financial/Accounting Officer) of the registrant hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.  Dated: March 18, 2010 /s/ Troy A. Lyndon Troy A. Lyndon Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

FOR THE 

STATE OF TEXAS 

ROBERT OTHELLA LEWIS, § 

A/K/A ROBERT LEWIS § 

APPELLANT § 

 § CCA NO. PD-_____-15 

V. § COA NO. 02-13-00416-CR 

 § 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, § 

APPELLEE § 

STATE’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

FILING OF STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: 

COMES NOW Petitioner, the State of Texas, by and through Sharen 

Wilson, Criminal District Attorney of Tarrant County, and files this the State's 

Motion To Extend Time To File State's Petition For Discretionary review in the 

above captioned appeal and for cause would respectfully show the following:

I. 

The court below is Criminal District Court Number One of Tarrant County, 

Texas, visiting Judge Jerry Woodlock, presiding. The style of the case in the trial 

court is The State of Texas v. Robert Othella Lewis, a/k/a Robert Lewis, No. 

1299359D. Appellant was convicted by a jury of felony driving while intoxicated. 

RR. IV 59. He was then sentenced by that jury to five years’ incarceration. RR. 

IV 134. The style and number of the case in the lower appellate court is Robert 

PD-0410-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/13/2015 12:10:55 PM

Accepted 4/15/2015 4:41:44 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
Othella Lewis a/k/a Robert Lewis v. The State of Texas, No. 02-13-0416-CR. 

Appellant is NOT in custody.

II.

The deadline for filing the State’s petition is April 13, 2014. No extensions 

have previously been granted regarding the State's petition. The length of time 

requested for this extension is 30 days from April 13, 2015 -- until May 13, 2015. 

In light of all the foregoing, the modest extension herein requested, is sought solely 

in the interest of justice and not for purposes of delay.

III.

Recently, undersigned counsel has filed briefs in: Thomas Lester Harper v. 

The State of Texas, No. 02-14-00189-CR; and Michael Raynard Speace, Jr. v. The 

State of Texas, No. 08-15-00445 through 00447-CR.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State of Texas prays that 

this Court grant this State’s Motion for Extension of Time for Filing of State’s 

Petition for Discretionary Review and extend time for filing of the document to 

May 13, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

SHAREN WILSON

Criminal District Attorney

Tarrant County, Texas

2
DEBRA WINDSOR, Assistant

Criminal District Attorney 

Chief of the Appellate Section

 /s/ DANIELLE A. KENNEDY

DANIELLE A. KENNEDY, Assistant

Criminal District Attorney

State Bar No. 12166650

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap

Fort Worth, Texas 76196-0201

(817) 884-1687

FAX (817) 884-1672

CCAAppellatealerts@tarrantcounty.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true copy of the State's brief has been e-served to opposing counsel, the 

Hon. Abe Factor, lawfactor@yahoo.com, 5719 Airport Freeway, Fort Worth, 

Texas 76117, on this, the 13th day of April, 2015

 /s/ DANIELLE A. KENNEDY

DANIELLE A. KENNEDY

H:\KENNEDY.L09 lewis, robert othella pdr extn.mxt

3
ACCEPTED

12-14-00280-CV

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

4/15/2015 3:55:02 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/15/2015 3:55:02 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Monthly Inventory Report

As of July 31, 2022

(Million Units Except as Noted)

CCC Commodity 

Unit of 

Measure

Outstanding

Under Loan

CY 2020

Outstanding

Under Loan

CY 2021

Outstanding

Under Loan

CY 2022

CCC 

Owned 

Inventory 

(Actual)

Butter Pounds - - - -

Cheese Pounds - - - -

Nonfat Dry Milk Pounds - - - -

Barley Bushels 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 

Corn Bushels 0.1 98.0 0.0 0.0 

Oats Bushels 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 

Sorghum Cwt. 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 

Soybeans Bushels

 

0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 

Wheat Bushels 0.1 0.9 2.0 0.0 

Rice Cwt. 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 

Refined Sugar Pounds 0.0 389.7 0.0 0.0 

 In-process Beet Pounds 0.0 437.0 0.0 0.0 

Raw Cane Sugar Pounds 0.0 657.3 0.0 0.0 

 In-process Cane Pounds - - - -

Honey Pounds 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 

Peanuts Tons 50.0 685,650 0.0 0.0 

Canola Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Crambe* Cwt. - - - -

Flaxseed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Mustard Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Rapeseed* Cwt. - - - -

Safflower Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Sesame Seed* Cwt. - - - -

Sunflower Seed (Oil)* Cwt. 0.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 

Sunflower Seed

(Other)* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Dry Peas* Cwt. 0.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 

Lentils* Cwt. 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 

Chickpeas* Cwt. 0.0 19.0 0.0 0.0 

Upland Cotton

1,000 Running

Bales 0.0 

 

496.3 0.0 0.0

ELS Cotton

1,000 Running 

Bales 0.0 30.5 0.0 0.0
Notes: 

• *Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units.

• CCC acquired 2020 Crop Year Upland (if not specified) and ELS cotton because of the following 

months' forfeited Marketing Assistance Loans:

o 22 bales from November 2021, 85 bales from December 2021, 87 bales from January and 

20 bales from February 2022. 

o Invitations sold all 22 bales in November, 85 bales in December, 87 bales in January and 

20 bales in February 2022.

o In total, there were 0 bales of cotton in inventory as of June 22, 2022.

Report Completed: August 24, 2022.
<TABLE>
                                                             Exhibit 12.2



                             Boston Edison Company
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                   and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements
                         Year ended December 31, 1996
                                (in thousands)


<S>                                                    <C>
Net income from continuing operations                  $141,546

Income taxes                                             87,982

Fixed charges                                           120,359
                                                       --------

     Total                                             $349,887
                                                       ========

Interest expense                                       $109,374
Interest component of rentals                            10,985
                                                       --------

     Subtotal                                          $120,359
                                                       --------

Preferred stock dividend requirements                    24,862
                                                       --------

     Total                                             $145,221
                                                       ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
preferred stock dividend requirements                      2.41
                                                           ====

</TABLE>