Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2012 / Notices 24515 

certain consumer electronics, including 

mobile phones and tablets, by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 5,854,893 (‘‘the ‘893 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 6,237,025 (‘‘the ‘025 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,054,904 (‘‘the 

‘904 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,185,054 

(‘‘the ‘054 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 

7,206,809 (‘‘the ‘809 patent’’). The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and cease and desist 

orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

http://www.usitc.gov. The public record 

for this investigation may be viewed on 

the Commission’s electronic docket 

(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 

210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2012). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

April 17, 2012, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain consumer 

electronics, including mobile phones 

and tablets, that infringe one or more of 

claims 13, 15, and 16 of the ‘893 patent; 

claims 33–37 and 43 of the ‘025 patent; 

claims 17, 19, 20, 22, and 23 of the ‘904 

patent; claims 10, 11, 13, and 14 of the 

‘054 patent; claims 1–12, 34, 37, 40, and 

41 of the ‘809 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(1), 19 C.F.R. § 210.50(b)(1), 

the presiding administrative law judge 

shall take evidence or other information 

and hear arguments from the parties and 

other interested persons with respect to 

the public interest in this investigation, 

as appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact and a 

recommended determination on this 

issue, which shall be limited to the 

statutory public interest factors, 19 

U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Pragmatus 

AV, LLC, 601 King Street, Suite 200, 

Alexandria, VA 22314. 

(b) The respondents the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

ASUSTeK Computer, Inc., 4F, 150, LiTe Road, Beitou District, Taipei City, 

Taiwan; 

ASUS Computer International, Inc., 800 

Corporate Way, Fremont, CA 94539; 

HTC Corporation, 23 Xinghua Road, 

Taoyuan, 330, Taiwan; 

HTC America, Inc., 13920 SE Eastgate 

Way, Suite 400, Bellevue, WA 98005; 

LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers, 

20, Yoido-dong, Youngdungpo-gu, 

Seoul, 157–721, Republic of Korea; 

LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., 1000 Sylvan 

Ave., Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632; 

LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., 

Inc., 10101 Old Grove Road, San 

Diego, CA 92131; 

Pantech Co., Ltd., 1–2, DMC Sangamdon Mapo-gu, Seoul, Republic of 

Korea; 

Pantech Wireless, Inc., 5607 Glenridge 

Drive, Suite 500, Atlanta, GA 30342; 

Research In Motion Ltd., 295 Phillip 

Street, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3W8, 

Canada; 

Research In Motion Corp., 122 W. John 

Carpenter Parkway, Suite 430, Irving, 

TX 75039; 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, 1320–10, 

Seocho 2-dong Seocho-gu, Seoul, 

Republic of Korea; 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 105 

Challenger Rd., Ridgefield Park, NJ 

07660; 

Samsung Telecommunications America, 

L.L.C., 1301 East Lookout Drive, 

Richardson, TX 75082. 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 18, 2012. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9767 Filed 4–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Pursuant to the Clean Water Act 

Notice is hereby given that on April 

16, 2012 a proposed Consent Decree 

(‘‘Decree’’) in United States of America 

and the State of Tennessee v. the City 

of Memphis (‘‘City’’), Civil Action No. 

2:10–CV–02083–SHM–dkv was lodged 

with the United States District Court for 

the Western District of Tennessee. This 

Decree represents a settlement of claims 

against the City of Memphis under 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

24516 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2012 / Notices 

Section 301, 309, and 402 of the Clean 

Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1319, and 

1342; and Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 69–3– 

108(b)(6), 114 and 115; and Sections 101 

through 138 of the Tennessee Water 

Quality Control Act (‘‘TWQCA’’). 

Under this settlement between the 

United States and the State and the City, 

the City will be required to develop and 

implement a number of sewer 

management, operation and 

maintenance programs, including: A 

sewer overflow response plan, a fats, 

oils, and grease management program, a 

lift station and force main operations 

and maintenance program, and an 

infrastructure rehabilitation program. 

The City will identify priority 

rehabilitation projects within the first 

year after entry of the proposed Consent 

Decree. The City will assess a minimum 

of 10% of its system and rehabilitate 

approximately 6% of its system in the 

first year of the Consent Decree, 

including major interceptors at risk of 

failures similar to the one that occurred 

on the Wolf River in 2008. The Consent 

Decree also provides for the payment of 

a civil penalty of $1.29 million. The 

penalty will be split evenly between the 

United States and the State. The City 

will pay $645,000 to the United States. 

Tennessee’s payment will be in the form 

of state projects including an effluent 

study at the M.C. Stiles Wastewater 

Treatment Plant discharge point and a 

sewer GPS mapping project. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the proposed Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General of the 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20530, and should refer 

to United States of America and State 

of Tennessee v. City of Memphis, Civil 

Action No. 2:10–CV–02083–SHM–dkv, 

D.J. Ref. 90–5–1–1–09720. 

The proposed Decree may be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site, http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Decree may also be obtained by mail 

from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by 

faxing or emailing a request to ‘‘Consent 

Decree Copy’’ 

(EESCDCopy.ENRD@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–5271. 

If requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library by mail, please enclose 

a check in the amount of $19.50 (25 

cents per page reproduction cost) for the 

Consent Decree alone or $81.50 for the 

Consent Decree and appendices payable 

to the U.S. Treasury or, if requesting by 

email or fax, forward a check in either 

of those amounts to the Consent Decree 

Library at the address given above. 

Henry Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9770 Filed 4–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[Docket No. OTJ 101] 

Solicitation of Comments on Request 

for United States Assumption of 

Concurrent Federal Criminal 

Jurisdiction; Los Coyotes Band of 

Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians 

AGENCY: Office of Tribal Justice, 

Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice solicits public 

comments on the Request for United 

States Assumption of Concurrent 

Federal Criminal Jurisdiction recently 

submitted to the Office of Tribal Justice, 

Department of Justice by the Los 

Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno 

Indians pursuant to the provisions of 28 

CFR 50.25. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

postmarked and electronic comments 

must be submitted on or before June 8, 

2012. Comments received by mail will 

be considered timely if they are 

postmarked on or before that date. The 

electronic Federal Docket Management 

System (FDMS) will accept comments 

until Midnight Eastern Time at the end 

of that day. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier: 

submit written comments via regular or 

express mail to Mr. Tracy Toulou, 

Director, Office of Tribal Justice, 

Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW., Room 2310, Washington, 

DC 20530. 

• Fax: submit comments to the 

attention of Mr. Tracy Toulou, Office of 

Tribal Justice, Department of Justice, 

(202) 514–9078 (not a toll-free number). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Please contact Mr. Tracy Toulou, 

Director, Office of Tribal Justice, 

Department of Justice, at (202) 514–8812 

(not a toll-free number). To ensure 

proper handling of comments, please 

reference ‘‘Docket No. OTJ 101’’ on all 

electronic and written correspondence. 

The Department encourages all 

comments be submitted electronically 

through http://www.regulations.gov 

using the electronic comment form 

provided on that site. An electronic 

copy of the request for United States 

assumption of concurrent federal 

criminal jurisdiction submitted by the 

Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and 

Cupeno Indians is also available at the 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site for 

easy reference. Paper comments that 

duplicate the electronic submission are 

not necessary as all comments 

submitted to http://www.regulations.gov 

will be posted for public review and are 

part of the official docket record. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Posting of Public Comments. Please 

note that all comments received are 

considered part of the public record and 

made available for public inspection 

online at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Such information includes personal 

identifying information (such as your 

name and address) voluntarily 

submitted by the commenter. 

You are not required to submit 

personal identifying information in 

order to comment on this rule. 

Nevertheless, if you want to submit 

personal identifying information (such 

as your name and address) as part of 

your comment, but do not want it to be 

posted online, you must include the 

phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING 

INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph 

of your comment. You also must locate 

all the personal identifying information 

you do not want posted online in the 

first paragraph of your comment and 

identify what information you want 

redacted. 

If you want to submit confidential 

business information as part of your 

comment but do not want it to be posted 

online, you must include the phrase 

‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS 

INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph 

of your comment. You also must 

prominently identify confidential 

business information to be redacted 

within the comment. If a comment has 

so much confidential business 

information that it cannot be effectively 

redacted, all or part of that comment 

may not be posted on http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Personal identifying information and 

confidential business information 

identified and located as set forth above 

will be placed in the agency’s public 

docket file, but not posted online. If you 

wish to inspect the agency’s public 

docket file in person by appointment, 

please see the paragraph above entitled 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES