1248 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 8, 2013 / Notices 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 

210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2012). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

January 2, 2013, ORDERED THAT— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain electronic 

devices, including wireless 

communication devices, tablet 

computers, media players, and 

televisions, and components thereof that 

infringe one or more of claims 1–3, 5, 

8, 11, 13, 14, and 18 of the ‘052 patent; 

claims 28–33, 36, 37, 39–43, 46, 47, 50, 

51, and 54 of the ‘359 patent; claim 30 

of the ‘888 patent; claims 1–3, 8, 10, 19, 

20, 23, 24, 26–33, 38, 40, 50, 53–55, 57, 

and 62–68 of the ‘556 patent; 1, 4, 6, 9– 

13, and 16–20 of the ‘310 patent; claims 

1, 24–26, 28, 30, and 54 of the ‘917 

patent; claims 1, 4, 6, 7, 17, 20, 22, and 

23 of the ‘506 patent; claims 1–3, 11–14, 

19, 21, 22, and 30–32 of the ‘223 patent, 

claims 1, 4, 9, 10, and 12 of the ‘832 

patent; claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 15, 22, 25, 

26, 29, 32, 34, 45, 46, 49, 52, and 54 of 

the ‘215 patent; claims 1, 3, 5–8, and 

10–15 of the ‘992 patent, and whether 

an industry in the United States exists 

or is in the process of being established 

as required by subsection (a)(2) of 

section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the 

presiding administrative law judge shall 

take evidence or other information and 

hear arguments from the parties and 

other interested persons with respect to 

the public interest in this investigation, 

as appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact and a 

recommended determination on this 

issue, which shall be limited to the 

statutory public interest factors, 19 

U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are: 

Ericsson Inc., 6300 Legacy Drive, Plano, 

TX 75024; 

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericcson, 

Torshamsgatan 23, Kista, 164 83 

Stockholm, Sweden. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 85 

Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, NJ 

07660. 

Samsung Telecommunications America 

LLC, 1301 East Lookout Drive, 

Richardson, TX 75082. 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung 

Electronics Building, 1320–10, 

Seocho 2-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul 

137–857, Republic of Korea. 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: January 3, 2013. 

By order of the Commission. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00149 Filed 1–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–812] 

Certain Computing Devices With 

Associated Instruction Sets and 

Software; Notice of Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Granting a Joint Motion 

To Terminate This Investigation Based 

on a Settlement; Termination of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 18) granting a joint motion 

to terminate this investigation based on 

a settlement. The investigation is hereby 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

James A. Worth, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3065. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 8, 2013 / Notices 1249 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

investigation was instituted on February 

27, 2012, based upon a complaint filed 

on behalf of VIA Technologies, Inc. of 

New Taipei City, Taiwan; IP-First, LLC 

of Fremont, California; and Centaur 

Technology, Inc. of Austin, Texas 

(collectively, ‘‘VIA’’) on September 22, 

2011, as amended on October 13, 2011, 

and as further amended on October 31, 

2011. 76 FR 70490 (November 14, 2011). 

The complaint alleged violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. 1337) in the sale for importation, 

importation, or sale after importation in 

the United States of certain computing 

devices with associated instruction sets 

and software by reason of infringement 

of claims 1–4, 7–10, and 26–29 of U.S. 

Patent No. 6,253,312; claims 1, 14, and 

21 of U.S. Patent No. 6,253,311; claims 

20, 27, and 30 of U.S. Patent No. 

6,754,810; claims 1–3 and 10–14 of U.S. 

Patent No. 7,185,180; and claims 23, 24 

and 28–30 of U.S. Patent No. 7,155,598. 

The notice of institution named as 

respondent Apple Inc., a/k/a Apple 

Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, California 

(‘‘Apple’’). 

On November 19, 2012, VIA and 

Apple filed a joint motion seeking to 

terminate the investigation based upon 

a settlement agreement. On November 

29, 2012, the Commission investigative 

attorney filed a response in support of 

the motion. On November 30, 2012, the 

administrative law judge granted the 

motion, finding that termination of the 

investigation based on a settlement 

between VIA and Apple does not 

impose any undue burdens on the 

public health and welfare, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. No petitions for review were 

filed. 

Having considered the record in the 

investigation, the Commission has 

determined not to review the subject ID 

and to terminate the investigation. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 2, 2013. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearing and Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00070 Filed 1–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1121–NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Extension of a Currently 

Approved Collection; Comment 

Request: Equal Employment 

Opportunity Plan Certification and 

Short Form 

ACTION: 30-Day Notice. 

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Office of Justice Programs (OJP) will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. This 

proposed information collection was 

previously published in the Federal 

Register, Volume 77, Number 207, page 

65204, on October 25, 2012, allowing for 

a 60-day comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until February 7, 2013. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to the Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention: Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–7285. Written comments and 

suggestions from the public and affected 

agencies concerning the proposed 

collection of information are 

encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology; e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Revision of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: Equal 

Employment Opportunity Plan 

Certification and Short Form. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

The Office for Civil Rights, Office of 

Justice Programs, United States 

Department of Justice, is sponsoring the 

collection. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: State, and local, 

government instrumentalities. Other: 

For-profit Institutions. 28 CFR 42.301 et 

seq. authorizes the Department of 

Justice to collect information regarding 

employment practices from State or 

Local units of government, agencies of 

State and Local governments, and 

Private entities, institutions or 

organizations to which OJP, COPS or 

OVW extend Federal financial 

assistance. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond/reply: There are a total of 6371 

respondents. It is estimated that it will 

take 1,290 respondents receiving a grant 

of $500,000 or more one hour to 

complete an Equal Employment 

Opportunity Plan Short Form and 

submit it to the Office of Justice 

Programs. In addition, an estimated 

5,081 of respondents seeking grants 

ranging from $25,000 up to $500,000 

will be required to complete 

Certification stating that they are 

maintaining a current Equal 

Employment Opportunity Plan on file 

and submit the certification to OJP. 

Completion and submission of the 

Certification will take 1⁄4 hour. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: For the 6371 respondents, 

the total estimated burden hours on 

respondents would be 2,560 to complete 

the EEOP Short Form or Certification. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with