alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Salvatore DAuria, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Tut Systems Inc., on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Tut Systems, Inc.



Date: June 10, 2004



By:

/s/ Salvatore DAuriaSalvatore DAuria,President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board (Principal Executive Officer)
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-12733

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:16-cv-00040-JRH-GRS

HAMILTON KINARD, 

BRITNEE KINARD, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

JOHN GALLINA, 

Individually and as Agent of Purple Heart Homes, Inc., 

DALE BEATTY, 

Individually and as Agent of Purple Heart Homes, Inc., 

ASHLEY DOANE, 

Individually and as Agent of Purple Heart Homes, Inc., 

JIM LONCAR, 

Individually and as Agent of Purple Heart Homes, Inc., 

PURPLE HEART HOMES, INC., 

 Defendants - Appellees.

Case: 17-12733 Date Filed: 03/05/2018 Page: 1 of 3 
2

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________

(March 5, 2018)

Before MARCUS, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Hamilton and Britnee Kinard, represented by counsel, appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing with prejudice their action for breach of contract, 

intentional tort, and stubborn litigiousness against Purple Heart Homes, Inc. and a 

number of individual defendants. After review, we affirm. 

The Kinards’ brief contains only four paragraphs of argument, and those 

paragraphs contain only general legal principles. The brief does not attempt to 

apply those principles to the allegations in the complaint, nor does it explain why 

the district court erred in concluding that the complaint failed to state claims upon 

which relief could be granted. 

The Kinards have abandoned their claims because they have failed to 

provide appropriate arguments as to why they are entitled to relief. See Sapuppo v. 

Allstate Floridian Ins. Co., 739 F.3d 678, 681 (11th Cir. 2014) (“We have long 

held that an appellant abandons a claim when he either makes only passing 

references to it or raises it in a perfunctory manner without supporting arguments 

Case: 17-12733 Date Filed: 03/05/2018 Page: 2 of 3 
3

and authority.”). See also Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8) (“The appellant’s brief must 

contain . . . appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the 

authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies”). We therefore 

affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 17-12733 Date Filed: 03/05/2018 Page: 3 of 3
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE VII

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

COMMON RULES ON COMPETITION, TAXATION AND APPROXIMATION OF LAWS

CHAPTER 1

RULES ON COMPETITION

SECTION 1

SECTION 1

RULES APPLYING TO UNDERTAKINGS

Article 105

(ex Article 85 TEC)

(ex Article 85 TEC)

1.   Without prejudice to Article 104, the Commission shall ensure the application of the principles laid down in Articles 101 and 102. On application by a Member State or on its own initiative, and in cooperation with the competent authorities in the Member States, which shall give it their assistance, the Commission shall investigate cases of suspected infringement of these principles. If it finds that there has been an infringement, it shall propose appropriate measures to bring it to an end.

2.   If the infringement is not brought to an end, the Commission shall record such infringement of the principles in a reasoned decision. The Commission may publish its decision and authorise Member States to take the measures, the conditions and details of which it shall determine, needed to remedy the situation.

3.   The Commission may adopt regulations relating to the categories of agreement in respect of which the Council has adopted a regulation or a directive pursuant to Article 103(2)(b).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Docket T-2-2012]

On January 12, 2012, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board filed an application submitted by the Lincoln Foreign Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 59, requesting temporary/interim manufacturing (T/IM) authority, on behalf of Novartis Consumer Health, Inc., to manufacture pharmaceutical products under FTZ procedures within FTZ 59—Sites 3 and 4, in Lincoln, Nebraska.

                    The application was processed in accordance with T/IM procedures, as authorized by FTZ Board Orders 1347 (69 FR 52857, 8/30/04) and 1480 (71 FR 55422, 9/22/06), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (77 FR 4758, 1/31/2012). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval under T/IM procedures. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary in the above-referenced Board Orders, the application is approved, effective this date, until March 27, 2014, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.                

Dated: March 27, 2012.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-9357 Filed 4-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1373 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 31, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To protect, for current and future generations, the watershed, ecosystem, and cultural heritage of the Grand Canyon region in the State of Arizona, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1373 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grand Canyon Centen3 nial Protection Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF CERTAIN FEDERAL LAND IN THE 

5 STATE OF ARIZONA. 

6 (a) DEFINITION OF MAP.—In this Act, the term 

7 ‘‘Map’’ means the map prepared by the Bureau of Land 

8 Management entitled ‘‘Grand Canyon Centennial Protec9 tion Act’’ and dated July 11, 2019. 

10 (b) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

11 the approximately 1,006,545 acres of Federal land in the 

12 State of Arizona, generally depicted on the Map as ‘‘Fed13 eral Mineral Estate to be Withdrawn’’, including any land 

14 or interest in land that is acquired by the United States 

15 after the date of the enactment of this Act, are hereby 

16 withdrawn from— 

17 (1) all forms of entry, appropriation, and dis18 posal under the public land laws; 

19 (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining 

20 laws; and 

21 (3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral 

22 materials, and geothermal leasing laws. 

23 (c) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The Map shall be kept 

24 on file and made available for public inspection in the apVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:51 Oct 31, 2019 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1373.RFS H1373

SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1373 RFS

1 propriate offices of the Forest Service and the Bureau of 

2 Land Management. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 30, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Randall K. Gausman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tut Systems Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Tut Systems, Inc.



By:

/s/ Randall K. GausmanRandall K. GausmanVice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary




Date: August 2, 2005
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 115 

AN ACT 

To require the Department of State to establish a policy 

regarding the use of location-tracking consumer devices 

by employees at diplomatic and consular facilities, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 115 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Diplomats 

3 from Surveillance Through Consumer Devices Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SECURING UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC AND CON5 SULAR FACILITIES AGAINST CYBERSURVEIL6 LANCE. 

7 (a) POLICY ON LOCATION-TRACKING CONSUMER DE8 VICES.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the en9 actment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall establish 

10 a policy on the use of location-tracking consumer devices, 

11 including GPS-enabled devices, at United States diplo12 matic and consular facilities by United States Government 

13 employees, contractors, locally employed staff, and mem14 bers of other agencies deployed to or stationed at such 

15 facilities. 

16 (b) SECURITY BRIEFING.—Existing and new employ17 ees at United States diplomatic and consular facilities, in18 cluding contractors, locally employed staff, and members 

19 of other agencies deployed to or stationed at such facili20 ties, shall, as a part of the security briefings provided to 

21 such employees, be informed of the policy described in sub22 section (a) and given instructions on the use of location23 tracking consumer devices both on and off the premises 

24 of such facilities. 

25 (c) COORDINATION.—The Secretary of State shall co26 ordinate with the heads of any other agencies whose em-
3 

•HR 115 EH

1 ployees are deployed to or stationed at United States dip2 lomatic and consular facilities in the formulation of the 

3 policy described in subsection (a) and the dissemination 

4 of such policy pursuant to subsection (b). 

5 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the for6 mulation of the policy described in subsection (a), the Sec7 retary of State shall submit to the Committee on Foreign 

8 Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Com9 mittee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the 

10 details of such policy. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 10, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 115 

AN ACT 

To require the Department of State to establish a 

consular facilities, and for other purposes. sumer devices by employees at diplomatic and policy regarding the use of location-tracking con-
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Aventura  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Craig  A.  Waltzer,  Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that to my knowledge:

(1)     The  report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



November  12,  2005          By:     /s/  Craig  A.  Waltzer
                                     -----------------------
                                     Craig  A.  Waltzer
                                     Chief  Executive  Officer,  President  and
                                     Director
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 8, 2011 

p0228 

Order 

 

March 8, 2011 

141517 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141517 

 COA: 296071 

Wayne CC: 04-011943-FC 

KANYAMA HAMPTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 9, 2010 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000062

27-OCT-2015

08:01 AM
Jack GuentherAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 8, 2015

No. 04-13-00897-CV

Lynn Noble HAWTHORNE a/k/a Lynn Hawthorne,

Appellant

v.

Jack GUENTHER,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-20197

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: S.J.H.-J., A

MINOR

PETITION OF: C.H., MATERNAL AUNT

:

:

:

:

:

No. 103 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: A.O.H.-J., A

MINOR

PETITION OF: C.H., MATERNAL AUNT

:

:

:

:

:

No. 104 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE V

AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

CHAPTER 1

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Article 76

The acts referred to in Chapters 4 and 5, together with the measures referred to in Article 74 which ensure administrative cooperation in the areas covered by these Chapters, shall be adopted:

| (a) | on a proposal from the Commission, or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

on a proposal from the Commission, or

| (b) | on the initiative of a quarter of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

on the initiative of a quarter of the Member States.

---
EXHIBIT 23.3

CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report included in this Form 10-K, into Tom
Brown, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 Nos. 33-42991, 33-60191, 33-60842, 333-13157,
333-30069, 333-42011, 333-56577, 333-69353, 333-89031, 333-89033, 333-31426, 333-51320,
333-57814 and 333-74268.

| |  | RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
| |  | -------------------

March 25,
2003



QuickLinks
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA SANTOS SAENZ OVIEDO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-73083 

Agency No. A094-287-280 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 11, 2017**

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 

Maria Santos Saenz Oviedo, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal 

from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for withholding of 

removal and cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 18 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-73083 

§ 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Latter-Singh v. Holder, 668 F.3d 

1156, 1159 (9th Cir. 2012), and we review for substantial evidence the agency’s 

findings of fact, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We 

deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency correctly determined that Saenz Oviedo’s petty theft convictions 

under California Penal Code section 484 render her statutorily ineligible for 

cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C), 8 U.S.C. § 

1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I); see also Castillo-Cruz v. Holder, 581 F.3d 1154, 1160 (9th

Cir. 2009) (recognizing petty theft under California law as a categorical crime 

involving moral turpitude). Because Saenz Oviedo has been convicted of more 

than one crime involving moral turpitude, Saenz Oviedo does not qualify for the 

petty offense exception. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(ii)(II).

The agency found that Saenz Oviedo failed to establish a clear probability of 

future persecution based on her generalized fear of violence in Honduras or her 

fear that her son will be harmed because he is effeminate. Substantial evidence 

supports these findings. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 

2010) (“An [applicant’s] desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated 

by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected 

ground”); see also Fakhry v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1057, 1066 (9th Cir. 2008)

(evidence did not compel a finding of future persecution). Further, we lack 
3 14-73083 

jurisdiction to consider the particular social group argument that Saenz Oviedo

presents in her opening brief because she did not raise it to the BIA. See Barron v. 

Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (petitioner must exhaust issues or

claims in administrative proceedings below). Thus, we deny the petition as to 

Saenz Oviedo’s withholding of removal claim. 

We deny Sainz Oviedo’s request to refer the case to mediation.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1541

JONATHAN D. MILLER; NYE, PEABODY, STIRLING, HALE & MILLER, 

LLP,

Appellants,

v.

NATIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED,

Appellee.

No. 14-1543

DANIEL JOSEPH SCHENDZIELOS; SCHENDZIELOS & ASSOCIATES, LLC,

Appellants,

v.

NATIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED,

Appellee.

No. 14-1576

JOHN R. BEHRMANN; NANCY BEHRMANN,

Appellants,

v.
2

NATIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED,

Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-01181-LMB-TCB; 09-10525-BFK)

Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: April 8, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John F. Bloss, HIGGINS BENJAMIN PLLC, Greensboro, North 

Carolina; Daniel J. Schendzielos, SCHENDZIELOS & ASSOCIATES, 

LLC, Greenwood Village, Colorado; Jonathan D. Miller, NYE, 

PEABODY, STIRLING, HALE & MILLER, Santa Barbara, California, for 

Appellants. David B. Goroff, FOLEY & LARDNER, LLP, Chicago, 

Illinois; Erika L. Morabito, FOLEY & LARDNER, LLP, Washington, 

D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

John R. Behrmann, Nancy Behrmann, and their attorneys, 

Jonathan Miller, Nye Peabody, Stirling, Hale and Miller, LLP, 

and Daniel Joseph Schendzielos, Schendzielos & Associates, LLC, 

appeal from the district court’s order affirming the orders of 

the bankruptcy court denying the Behrmanns’ motion for leave to 

pursue litigation against the directors and officers of the 

Debtor, National Heritage Foundation, Incorporated, and granting 

National Heritage Foundation’s motion for sanctions. We have 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, and we 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. National Heritage Found., 

Inc. v. Miller, No. 1:13-cv-01181-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. May 5, 

2014). Although we deny National Heritage Foundation’s motion 

to strike the Appellants’ Reply brief, we grant the motion to 

submit these appeals on the briefs and dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED