alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

Converetible Debebture

Principal Amount:  $370,000-
Dated:  January 18, 2002.

State of Florida

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby promises to pay to the order
of KEN MYRON, the sum of Three hundred & seventy thousand dollars ($370,000- )
together with interest thereon at the rate of 12% per annum on the unpaid
balance. Said sum will be paid in the manner following:

         Interest commence accruing commencing Feb. 1, 2002.

         This debenture is convertible to Newport International Group Inc. is
common stock at $0.10 per share.

         All payments shall be first applied to interest and the balance to
principal. This note may be repaid, at any time, in whole or in part, without
penalty. All repayments shall be applied to principal.

         In the event this note shall be in default, and placed with an attorney
for collection, then the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable attorney fees
and cost of collection. All payments hereunder shall be made to such address as
may from time to time designated by the holder.

         The undersigned and all other parties to this debenture, whether as
endorsers, guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound hereunder until
this debenture shall be fully paid and waive demand, presentment and protest and
all notices thereto and further agree to remain bound, notwithstanding any
extension, renewal, modification, waiver, or other indulgence by any holder or
upon the discharge or release of any obligor hereunder or to this note, or upon
the exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as security for
this debenture. No modification or indulgence by any holder hereof shall be
binding unless in writing; and any indulgence on any one occasion shall not be
an indulgence for any other or future occasion. Any modification or change of
terms, hereunder granted by any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon
each of the undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgement of any of the
undersigned, and each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant to each
of the others a power of attorney to enter into any such modification on their
behalf. The rights of any holder hereof shall be cumulative and not necessary
successive. This note shall take effect as a sealed instrument and shall be
construed, governed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of
Florida. The undersigned hereby execute this debenture as principals and not as
sureties.


<PAGE>

Signed in the presence of:

/s/ SOLOMON LAM
--------------------------------------------

/s/ ILLEGIBLE                                  Witness
--------------------------------------------

Borrower:  Newport International
           Group Inc.


/s/ KEN MYRON
--------------------------------------------

/s/ STEVE BASKO                                 Witness
--------------------------------------------
Holder:  Ken Myron
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Michael L. Fulton, Respondent, v John Vogel, Also Known as AAA Tree Service, Respondent, and R.J. Paludi Insurance Agency et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Mercure, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 3, 1990, which ruled that General Accident Insurance, as insurer for R.J. Paludi Insurance Agency, is liable for the workers’ compensation benefits payable to claimant.

On June 13, 1985, Ronald Paludi, president and sole shareholder of R.J. Paludi Insurance Agency (hereinafter Paludi Agency), took title to a single-family residence in his individual capacity with the intention of converting the property to use as Paludi Agency’s business offices. In that connection, Paludi contracted with John Vogel for the removal of several trees on the property. On June 18, 1985, claimant, Vogel’s employee, was injured while operating a chain saw in connection with that activity, giving rise to this claim for workers’ compensation benefits. When it became apparent that Vogel did not have a policy of workers’ compensation insurance in effect, a dispute arose between Paludi Agency’s compensation carrier, General Accident Insurance, and the Uninsured Employers’ Fund of the Workers’ Compensation Board as to liability for payment. Following a hearing, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge determined that Paludi Agency was a contractor within the purview of Workers’ Compensation Law § 56 and that General Accident was liable for payment of benefits. Upon administrative appeal, the Board affirmed. This appeal ensued.

We affirm. As correctly contended by the Board, whether Paludi Agency was a general contractor under Workers’ Compensation Law §56 is a factual issue within its exclusive *798power to decide *(see, Matter of Green v Continental Transp. Lines,*13 AD2d 564), the controlling factor being the relationship between Paludi and his close corporation *(see, Matter of Gray v Aldrich,*39 AD2d 492, 493, *affd*34 NY2d 553). A reasonable inference that Paludi Agency acted as Paludi’s general contractor with respect to the renovation of the property may be drawn from the evidence adduced at the hearing that the property was being converted to corporate use, that all expenses attributable to the property, including the cost of tree removal, were paid out of corporate funds and that the property was subsequently leased to the corporation *(see, Matter of Green v Continental Transp. Lines, supra).*Thus, the Board’s decision was supported by substantial evidence and should be affirmed.

Mahoney, P. J., Levine, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00101]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-81,646]


CalAmp Wireless Networks Corporation, Waseca, MN; Notice of 
Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated September 26, 2012, the State of Minnesota 
requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative 
determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of 
the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA).
    Following the filing of the request for reconsideration, the 
Department issued a certification that includes workers of the subject 
firm (TA-W-80,399A; CalAmp Wireless Networks Corporation, Waseca, 
Minnesota; expires on December 2, 2013).

Conclusion

    Due to the eligibility of workers and former workers of CalAmp 
Wireless Networks Corporation, Waseca, Minnesota to apply for TAA, the 
Department determines that an investigation would serve no purpose. 
Accordingly, the application is denied.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of November, 2012
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2013-00101 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00083

- CV

Charles “ Chuck ” Bayne

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§ F rom the 43rd District Court

o f Parker County (CV

- 12

- 0187 )

July 18, 2013

P er C uriam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appe al should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
#### Harold JOHNSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 20379.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 21, 1963.

Harold Johnson, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

Edgar L. Jenkins, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and JOHNSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Cawley v. United States, 5th Cir., 251 F.2d 461.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00626-CV

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, and Ken Paxton,

Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellants

v.

Budget PrePay, Inc. , Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-11-001189, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Per Curiam

Appellants Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, and

Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas have filed an agreed motion to abate this appeal

pending consummation of settlement. Accordingly, we grant the motion and abate the appeal 1

until May 6, 2015, or until further order of this Court. All appellate deadlines will be tolled

during the period of abatement. Absent further order of this Court, this appeal will be

automatically reinstated after May 6, 2015.

We substitute Glen Hegar, in his official capacity, as successor to Susan Combs as 1

Comptroller of Public Accounts and Ken Paxton, in his official capacity, as successor to GregAbbott

as Attorney General. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(a).
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Abated

Filed: April 7, 2015

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements  for  American  Mortgage  Investors  Trust  and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000878774
<NAME>                        AMERICAN MORTGAGE INVESTORS TRUST
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,642,073
<SECURITIES>                                    12,508,436
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,140,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,310,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,241,334
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,069,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,310,525
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,143,028
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   434,055
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,708,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,708,973
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
                                               


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the County Court at Law No 3 of Lubbock County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on January 27,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

In the Interest of G.S. and A.S., Children

Case Number: 07-14-00416-CV Trial Court Number: 2013-508,850

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated January 27, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on April 14, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
_________________________________________ 

 

Order 

September 28, 2005 

128248 

CLAYTON W. COBURN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v 

RICHFIELD INDUSTRIES, and

TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 SC: 128248 

 COA: 257906 

WCAC: 03-000294 

Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 4, 

2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 78 

Expressing support for freedom of conscience. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2019 

Mr. BANKS submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for freedom of conscience. 

Whereas the settlement of the 13 colonies was driven in part 

by those seeking refuge from government-sponsored religious persecution; 

Whereas the Framers of the Constitution of the United 

States recognized the centrality of freedom of conscience 

to the establishment of the United States, enshrining in 

the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States that ‘‘Congress shall make no law respecting an 

establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise 

thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the 

press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, 

and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances’’; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 78 IH 

Whereas churches, synagogues, mosques, and other religious 

organizations have played a central and invaluable role in 

life in the United States; and 

Whereas Congress has recognized the importance of religious 

institutions by enacting a variety of legal protections for 

those institutions, including exemption from income 

taxes: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That— 

4 (1) the protections of freedom of conscience en5 shrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution 

6 of the United States remain central to the experi7 ment of the United States in republican self-govern8 ment under the Constitution of the United States; 

9 (2) government should not be in the business of 

10 dictating what ‘‘correct’’ religious beliefs are; and 

11 (3) any effort by the government to condition 

12 the receipt of the protections of the Constitution of 

13 the United States and the laws of the United States, 

14 including an exemption from taxation, on the public 

15 policy positions of an organization is an affront to 

16 the spirit and letter of the First Amendment to the 

17 Constitution of the United States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 3

THE UNION'S ADVISORY BODIES

Article 300

1.   The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall be assisted by an Economic and Social Committee and a Committee of the Regions, exercising advisory functions.

2.   The Economic and Social Committee shall consist of representatives of organisations of employers, of the employed, and of other parties representative of civil society, notably in socio-economic, civic, professional and cultural areas.

3.   The Committee of the Regions shall consist of representatives of regional and local bodies who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly.

4.   The members of the Economic and Social Committee and of the Committee of the Regions shall not be bound by any mandatory instructions. They shall be completely independent in the performance of their duties, in the Union's general interest.

5.   The rules referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 governing the nature of the composition of the Committees shall be reviewed at regular intervals by the Council to take account of economic, social and demographic developments within the Union. The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall adopt decisions to that end.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT NO. 11.1

                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                Years Ended December 31,
                             ------------------------------
                               1996       1995       1994
                             --------   --------   --------
                        (in thousands, except per share amounts)
<S>                          <C>        <C>        <C>      
Primary

   Weighted average common
    shares outstanding         21,116     16,292     15,464
   Net effect of dilutive
    stock options,
     treasury stock method      1,107        560         --
                             --------   --------   --------

            Total common
              shares           22,223     16,852     15,464
                             ========   ========   ========

   Net income to common
    shareholders             $  6,263   $  5,785   $   (160)
                             ========   ========   ========

   Primary earnings per
    common share             $    .28   $    .34   $   (.01)
                             ========   ========   ========

Fully Diluted

   Weighted average common
    shares outstanding         21,116     16,292     15,464
   Net effect of dilutive
    stock options,
     treasury stock method      1,107        560        457
   Effect of convertible
    preferred stock             1,525         --         --
                             --------   --------   --------

            Total common
           shares              23,748     16,292     15,921
                             ========   ========   ========

   Net income to common
     shareholders            $  7,935   $  5,785   $   (160)
                             ========   ========   ========

   Fully diluted earnings
     per common share        $    .33   $    .34   $   (.01)
                             ========   ========   ========
</TABLE>


                                      -65-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                   1

<S>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   APR-30-1998
<CASH>                         160,598
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  491,993
<ALLOWANCES>                   78,736
<INVENTORY>                    1,601,336
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               3,256,414
<PP&E>                         2,279,209
<DEPRECIATION>                 1,060,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 10,870,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          2,388,751
<BONDS>                        2,576,412
<COMMON>                       116,730
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    506,834
<OTHER-SE>                     5,359,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   10,870,445
<SALES>                        5,456,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               5,456,106
<CGS>                          2,727,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  4,801,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               15,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             255,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                418,814
<INCOME-TAX>                   19,880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            398,934
<DISCONTINUED>                 269,219
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   668,153
<EPS-BASIC>                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                  0.00


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the
period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Dated: May 1, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    JEFFREY
KATZENBERG            
|                   |  |  |  | Jeffrey Katzenberg                   
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|                   |  | 
|Dated: May 1, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    LEWIS W. COLEMAN              
|                   |  |  |  | Lewis W. Coleman                     
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.