Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 8, 2014 / Notices 19375 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Parole Commission 

Sunshine Act Meeting 

TIME AND DATE: 12:00 p.m., Thursday, 

April 17, 2014. 

PLACE: U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K 

Street NE., 3rd Floor, Washington, DC. 

STATUS: Closed. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Determination on six original 

jurisdiction cases. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Jacqueline Graham, Staff Assistant to 

the Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission, 

90 K Street NE., 3rd Floor, Washington, 

DC 20530, (202) 346–7001. 

Dated: April 3, 2014. 

J. Patricia W. Smoot, 

Acting General Counsel, U.S. Parole 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–07913 Filed 4–4–14; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–31–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request; 

Application for Waiver of Surface 

Sanitary Facilities Requirements 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor 

(DOL) is submitting the Mine Safety and 

Health Administration (MSHA) 

sponsored information collection 

request (ICR) titled, ‘‘Application for 

Waiver of Surface Sanitary Facilities 

Requirements,’’ to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval for continued use, 

without change, in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Public 

comments on the ICR are invited. 

DATES: The OMB will consider all 

written comments that agency receives 

on or before May 8, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with 

applicable supporting documentation; 

including a description of the likely 

respondents, proposed frequency of 

response, and estimated total burden 

may be obtained free of charge from the 

RegInfo.gov Web site at http:// 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201402-1219-001 

(this link will only become active on the 

day following publication of this notice) 

or by contacting Michel Smyth by 

telephone at 202–693–4129, TTY 202– 

693–8064, (these are not toll-free 

numbers) or by email at 

DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

Submit comments about this request 

by mail or courier to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL– 

MSHA, Office of Management and 

Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street 

NW., Washington, DC 20503; by Fax: 

202–395–6881 (this is not a toll-free 

number); or by email: 

OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Commenters are encouraged, but not 

required, to send a courtesy copy of any 

comments by mail or courier to the U.S. 

Department of Labor-OASAM, Office of 

the Chief Information Officer, Attn: 

Departmental Information Compliance 

Management Program, Room N1301, 

200 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20210; or by email: 

DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693– 

4129, TTY 202–693–8064, (these are not 

toll-free numbers) or by email at 

DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DOL 

seeks to extend PRA authorization for 

the Application for Waiver of Surface 

Sanitary Facilities Requirements 

specified in regulations 30 CFR 71.403, 

71.404, 75.1712–4, and 75.1712–5. 

MSHA regulations require a covered 

coal mine operator to provide bathing 

facilities, clothing change rooms, and 

sanitary flush toilet facilities in a 

location that is convenient for use of the 

miners. See CFR 71.400 through 71.402 

and 75.1712–1 through .1712–3. The 

regulations allow an operator that is 

unable to meet any or all of the 

requirements to apply for a waiver. See 

30 CFR 71.403, 71.404, 75.1712–4, and 

75.1712–5. The coal mine operator files 

the application with the MSHA District 

Manager for the district in which the 

mine is located. The application must 

contain the name and address of the 

mine operator, name and location of the 

mine, and a detailed statement of the 

grounds on which the waiver is 

requested. At the same time the 

application is sent to the MSHA District 

Manager, the operator must forward a 

copy to the appropriate Regional 

Program Director, National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health, and a 

post copy showing the addresses of the 

appropriate District Manager and 

Regional Program Director for at least 

thirty (30) days on the mine bulletin 

board. 

This information collection is subject 

to the PRA. A Federal agency generally 

cannot conduct or sponsor a collection 

of information, and the public is 

generally not required to respond to an 

information collection, unless it is 

approved by the OMB under the PRA 

and displays a currently valid OMB 

Control Number. In addition, 

notwithstanding any other provisions of 

law, no person shall generally be subject 

to penalty for failing to comply with a 

collection of information that does not 

display a valid Control Number. See 5 

CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The DOL 

obtains OMB approval for this 

information collection under Control 

Number 1219–0024. 

OMB authorization for an ICR cannot 

be for more than three (3) years without 

renewal, and the current approval for 

this collection is scheduled to expire on 

June 30, 2014. The DOL seeks to extend 

PRA authorization for this information 

collection for three (3) more years, 

without any change to existing 

requirements. The DOL notes that 

existing information collection 

requirements submitted to the OMB 

receive a month-to-month extension 

while they undergo review. For 

additional substantive information 

about this ICR, see the related notice 

published in the Federal Register on 

December 27, 2013 (78 FR 79008). 

Interested parties are encouraged to 

send comments to the OMB, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs at 

the address shown in the ADDRESSES

section within 30 days of publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register. In 

order to help ensure appropriate 

consideration, comments should 

mention OMB Control Number 1219– 

0024. The OMB is particularly 

interested in comments that: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: DOL–MSHA. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

19376 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 8, 2014 / Notices 

Title of Collection: Application for 

Waiver of Surface Sanitary Facilities 

Requirements. 

OMB Control Number: 1219–0024. 

Affected Public: Private Sector— 

businesses or other for-profits. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Respondents: 887. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Responses: 887. 

Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 

368 hours. 

Total Estimated Annual Other Costs 

Burden: $4,435. 

Dated: April 1, 2014. 

Michel Smyth, 

Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2014–07754 Filed 4–7–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–43–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–83,096] 

Newark Recycled Paperboard 

Solutions; Newark Paperboard 

Products; Greenville, Pennsylvania; 

Notice of Negative Determination 

Regarding Application for 

Reconsideration 

By application dated January 4, 2014 

a worker requested administrative 

reconsideration of the Department’s 

negative determination regarding 

eligibility for workers and former 

workers of Newark Recycled Paperboard 

Solutions, Newark Paperboard Products, 

Greenville, Pennsylvania (subject firm) 

to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA). The negative 

determination was issued on November 

13, 2013, and the Department’s Notice 

of negative determination was 

published in the Federal Register on 

December 9, 2013 (78 FR 73888). The 

subject workers produce recycled 

paperboard tubes and cores. Workers are 

not separately identifiable by product 

line. 

The negative determination was 

issued because the subject firm did not 

shift to a foreign country production of 

articles like or directly competitive with 

the recycled paperboard tubes and cores 

produced by the workers at the subject 

firm; the subject firm did not, during the 

relevant period, increase imports of 

articles like or directly competitive with 

the recycled paperboard tubes and cores 

produced by the workers at the subject 

firm; declining customers of the subject 

firm did not, during the relevant period, 

increase imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with the recycled 

paperboard tubes and cores produced by 

the workers of the subject firm; the 

subject firm was not a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a worker group eligible to 

apply for TAA, per Section 222(b) of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (the 

Act); and the subject firm was not 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission, per Section 222(e) 

of the Act. 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), 

administrative reconsideration may be 

granted under the following 

circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of 

the law justified reconsideration of the 

decision. 

The request for reconsideration 

asserts that, due to the closure of two 

facilities that employed worker groups 

who are eligible to apply for TAA (TA– 

W–80,495 and TA–W–81,155), the costs 

of shipping of raw material to the 

Newark, Pennsylvania facility has 

increased, that ‘‘several of our 

customers have already been transferred 

to Canada’’ and that another customer 

(Aurubis) was scheduled to transfer to 

Canada. The request concludes that the 

increased costs of raw material and the 

customers’ decision to shift operations 

to Canada have ‘‘directly affected’’ 

employment at the subject firm. 

After careful review of the request for 

reconsideration, the support 

documentation, and previously 

submitted materials, the Department 

determines that there is no new 

information that supports a finding that 

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974 

was satisfied and that no mistake or 

misinterpretation of the facts or of the 

law with regards to the number or 

proportion of workers separated from 

the subject firm during the relevant 

period. 

During the initial investigation, the 

Department took into consideration the 

aforementioned certifications, inquired 

into imports of recycled paperboard 

tubes and cores (and like or directly 

competitive articles) by both the subject 

firm and the firm’s major declining 

customers, inquired whether the subject 

firm shifted to a foreign country the 

production of recycled paperboard tubes 

and cores (and like or directly 

competitive articles) or acquired such 

production from a foreign country, 

considered whether or not the workers 

of the subject firm are secondarilyaffected workers, and reviewed the 

International Trade Commission’s 

findings, and did not find that such 

activity occurred during the relevant 

period. 

The Department notes that, for 

purposes of the Act, the shift of 

customers’ operations to a foreign 

country is not a basis for certification. 

Conclusion 

After review of the application and 

investigative findings, I conclude that 

there has been no error or 

misinterpretation of the law or of the 

facts which would justify 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the 

application is denied. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of 

March 2014. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–07743 Filed 4–7–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Eligibility To 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Office of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

Section 221(a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 

the workers are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Title II, 

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations 

will further relate, as appropriate, to the 

determination of the date on which total 

or partial separations began or 

threatened to begin and the subdivision 

of the firm involved. 

The petitioners or any other persons 

showing a substantial interest in the 

subject matter of the investigations may 

request a public hearing, provided such 

request is filed in writing with the 

Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than April 18, 2014. 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments regarding the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES