alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.1


                  AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION MEMBERS/STATE STREET
                                COLLECTIVE TRUST

                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                   FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED FUND DECLARATION

                               GROWTH EQUITY FUND


                  Pursuant to Sections 3.03 and 7.01 of the Declaration of
Trust, dated December 5, 1991, as amended as of July 31, 1995 and as further
amended as of the date hereof, which authorizes State Street Bank and Trust
Company as trustee ("State Street" or the "Trustee") of the American Bar
Association Members/State Street Collective Trust (the "Collective Trust") to
amend the Fund Declarations of the investment funds established under the
Collective Trust, effective as of August 15, 2001 State Street hereby amends the
Fund Declaration dated January 1, 1999 of the Growth Equity Fund, an investment
fund established under the Collective Trust (the "Fund"), to replace Schedule B
thereto with the Amended and Restated Schedule B attached hereto. The provisions
of the Declaration of Trust are incorporated herein by reference.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY has
caused its name to be signed to this Amendment No.1 to the Fifth Amended and
Restated Fund Declaration for the Growth Equity Fund by its proper officer as of
August 10, 2001.

ATTEST:                            STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST
                                   COMPANY


By:_____________________________    By:______________________________

   Name:                               Name:
   Title:                              Title:


<PAGE>

                                                                               2

                                   SCHEDULE B
                                   ----------

                               GROWTH EQUITY FUND
                   FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED FUND DECLARATION


The Trustee has entered into an Investment Advisor Agreement for the Fund with
the following entities, and the Investment Advisors are entitled to payment of
compensation as specified therein:

                         CAPITAL GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY
                        DRESDNER RCM GLOBAL INVESTORS LLC
                              BANKERS TRUST COMPANY
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.34

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     Whereas UroMed Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation with its principal
place of business at 1400 Providence Highway, Building #2, Norwood,
Massachusetts 02062 ("the Company") and Daniel Muscatello an individual residing
at [  ] ("Employee") are parties to an Employment Agreement dated on February 4,
1997, amended on December 1, 1999 and on March 12, 2001

       Whereas both parties seek to continue the employment relationship on
terms and conditions acceptable to each;

   NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual
promises and covenants contained herein, Employee and the Company hereby agree
as follows:

1. Amend paragraph 2(a) of the aforementioned Employment agreement by striking
it in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

"Employee's annual compensation shall be $295,000.00 ("the Base Salary")
effective as of January 1, 2002. Employee shall be paid on the 15/th/ day and
the last day of each calendar month for the current month's employment. Pay
shall be adjusted pro rata for any partial week of employment and standard
employer deductions shall be made from each payment. Employee's gross
semi-monthly compensation shall be subjected to an annual review and
adjustment."

Both parties agree to add a new paragraph 2(d) of the aforementioned Employment
Agreement

2. Add paragraph 2(d) which should read in its entirety:

"Upon signing an amendment to this Employment Agreement during January, 2002,
the Employee shall immediately be paid a one-time signing bonus in the amount of
$85,000."

3. Amend paragraph 4 of the aforementioned Employment agreement by striking it
in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

"Term. As an at-will employee, Employee understands that this agreement and the
employment hereunder may be terminated by either party hereto at any time with
or without cause. If not terminated, this agreement shall cover the terms of the
Employee's employment for a period ending on December 31, 2002. At such time,
the term of this agreement with automatically be extended for an additional one
year unless either the Employee or the Company provides notice of non-renewal
before September 30 2002. The term of this arrangement is referred to as the
"Term". The Term of this Agreement shall not affect the covenants herein that
are intended to survive the Term. Annual salary adjustments pursuant to section
2 above shall not affect the other terms and conditions hereof nor shall it
necessitate any written modifications hereof."

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have affixed their hands and seals
upon two (2) counterpart originals hereof as of January 23, 2002.

EMPLOYEE                               UROMED CORPORATION


/s/ Daniel Muscatello                  By /s/ Richard Sandberg
---------------------                     --------------------------------------
                                          Chairman of the Compensation Committee
MICHEAL B. MURRAY

DISTRICT ATTORNEY

35TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BROWN AND MILLS COUNTIES 

200 S. BROADWAY, COURTHOUSE

BROWNWOOD, TEXAS 76801

(325) 646-0444 FAX: (325) 643-4053

CHRIS BROWN

FIRST ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY

ELISHA BIRD

ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY

J. CHRISTINA NELSON

ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY

 April 9, 2015 

The Court of Criminal Appeals 

Supreme Court Building 

201 West 14th Street, Room 106 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Re: Travis Edward Anderson, PD-0026-15

To the Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals: 

 The State has received Travis Edward Anderson’s Pro Se Petition for Discretionary 

Review. In lieu of filing a formal response, the State would simply ask this Court to refuse to 

review this case because Petitioner has failed to provide an appropriate reason for review under 

Rule 66.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Although Petitioner has filed pro se, he is 

still required to present an adequate basis for review. 

 The State would point out in support of its claim that the petition does not state an 

adequate basis for review that all of the argument under Ground I of the petition is simply a 

restatement, sometimes a direct copy, of Petitioner’s brief filed in the Eleventh Court of 

Appeals.1

 A petition for discretionary review must do more than simply copy the original brief 

filed in the court below. It must articulate some ground for review under Rule 66.3 or at a 

minimum make some representation as to how the lower court erred in its analysis. 

Furthermore, although Ground II of the petition is not a direct copy of the brief from the 

lower court, Ground II asserts a new basis for review that was not raised on appeal. 

Discretionary review is not available for grounds or issues not decided by the lower court of 

appeals. See Tex. R. App. Proc. §66.1 & 66.3. 

 

1

“Ground I” of the petition is virtually a literal restatement of “Issue One” of the Brief for Appellant filed in the 

Eleventh Court of Appeals. Although there are some differences, most are minor punctuation differences and none 

of the differences assert any substance that differs from the argument in the Brief for Appellant. 

PD-0026-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/9/2015 2:38:22 PM

Accepted 4/15/2015 3:19:14 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
As this Court is aware, refusal of a petition for discretionary review does not constitute 

endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the court of appeals. Aguilar v. State, 

830 S.W.2d 612, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (en banc).

Should this Court choose to grant review, the State requests notice and time to respond to 

the merits of the claims presented by Petitioner.

Sincerely yours,

/S/ Elisha Bird

Elisha Bird

Assistant District Attorney

cc: Travis Edward Anderson, TDCJ #1812491, Wallace Pack 1 Unit, 2400 Wallace Pack Road, 

Navsota, Texas 77868
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This Certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report of
Finlay Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
November 2, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying
the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The undersigned, in their respective
capacities as set forth below, hereby certify that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


    /s/ Arthur E. Reiner, Chief Executive Officer       Date:  December 11, 2002
    --------------------


    /s/ Bruce E. Zurlnick, Chief Financial Officer      Date:  December 11, 2002
    ---------------------
Marketing and Regulatory Programs – Agricultural Marketing Service – Specialty Crops Program – Specialty Crops Inspection Division 1 of 1

 Inspection Aid No. 91

 July 2016
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mark Lana, of HS3 Technologies, Inc., hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
  of HS3 Technologies, Inc. for the six months ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report")
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of HS3 Technologies, Inc.

|Dated: November 14, 2008                                   | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                           | 
|                                                           | 
|/s/ Mark Lana                                              | 
|Mark Lana                                                  | 
|Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director | 
|(Principal Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer  | 
|and Principal Accounting Officer)                          | 

---
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C. 20549




FORM 10-Q/A


Amendment
No. 1




x    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




For the
quarterly period ended November 30, 2008


OR


o    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




For the
transition period from __________ to __________




Commission
File Number: 333-118138




Quantum
Energy, Inc.


(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)




Nevada
            
            
            98-0428608(State
      or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
            
            
            (I.R.S.
      Employer Identification Number)




7250
NW Expressway Suite 260


OKLAHOMA
CITY, OK, 73132


(Address
of principal executive offices)




(405)
728-3800


(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)






(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)




Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.




Yes x   
No o




Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company”) in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.





Large
accelerated filer   o           Accelerated
filer o





Non-accelerated filer o          Smaller
reporting company x







Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).




Yeso    
No x




At
January 13, 2009 49,743,000 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock were
outstanding.





This
amendment is being filed to correct an error made on the cover page of the
original filing that indicated that Quantum Energy, Inc. is a shell
company. Quantum Energy is not a shell company and this amendment has corrected
the error on the cover page













SIGNATURES






In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.






Quantum
Energy, Inc.




By:
            /s/ Richard PorterfieldRichard
      Porterfield
              President
      and Chief Financial Officer




Date:  July
24, 2009
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

Nos. 07-14-00280-CR, 07-14-00281-CR 

TEDDIE WAYNE DAVENPORT, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 77th District Court 

Limestone County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 13,187-A, 13,188-A; Honorable Patrick H. Simmons, Presiding 

 

April 13, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant, Teddie Wayne Davenport, was convicted of burglary of a building,1

and sentenced to ten years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice (ID-TDCJ). In a consolidated trial, appellant was convicted of evading 

arrest in a motor vehicle2 with an affirmative finding of the use of a deadly weapon3for 

 

1

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(a)(1) (West 2011).

2

See id. § 38.04(a), (b)(1)(B) (West Supp. 2014).

3

See id. § 12.35(c)(1) (West Supp. 2014).
2

which he was also sentenced to ten years in the ID-TDCJ for this offense. Appellant 

gave notice of appeal. We will affirm.

Appellant’s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 498 (1967). In support of his 

motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in 

his opinion, the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be 

predicated. Id. at 744-45. In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, 

there is no error in the trial court’s judgment. Additionally, counsel has certified that he 

has provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw and 

appropriately advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response in this matter. 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The Court has also 

advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response. Additionally, appellant’s counsel 

has certified that he has provided appellant with a copy of the record to use in 

preparation of a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has not filed a response. 

By his Anders brief, counsel raises grounds that could possibly support an 

appeal, but concludes the appeal is frivolous. We have reviewed these grounds and 

made an independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any 

arguable grounds which might support an appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 

109 S. Ct. 346, 102 L. Ed. 2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim.
3

App. 2005). We have found no such arguable grounds and agree with counsel that the 

appeal is frivolous.4

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is hereby granted, and the trial court’s 

judgment is affirmed.

Mackey K. Hancock

 Justice

Do not publish. 

 

 

4 Counsel shall, within five days after this opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the 

opinion and judgment, along with notification of appellant=s right to file a pro se petition for discretionary 

review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4.
V 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1150 

For the relief of Enrique Soriano and Areli Soriano. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2019 

Ms. GARCIA of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Enrique Soriano and Areli Soriano. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ENRIQUE 

4 SORIANO AND ARELI SORIANO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Enrique Soriano and Areli Soriano shall each be eligi8 ble for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 

9 of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for perma10 nent residence upon filing an application for issuance of 

11 an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for 

12 adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1150 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Enrique Soriano 

2 or Areli Soriano enters the United States before the filing 

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), he or she shall be con4 sidered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 

5 if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 

6 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

7 as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Enrique Soriano and Areli Soriano, the Sec16 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce 

17 by 2, during the current or next following fiscal year, the 

18 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

19 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section 

20 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli21 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 

22 available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth 

23 under section 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1150 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Enrique Soriano and 

2 Areli Soriano shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 

3 accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi4 gration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 1, 2013.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:

                    1.                     *Van Buren Bancorporation, Inc.,*                     Keosauqua, Iowa; to acquire 100 percent of First Iowa State Bank, Albia, Iowa.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 3, 2013.

Margaret McCloskey Shanks,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2013-00108 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P