alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  ZENASCENT INC.
August  , 2001

To Whom It May Concern:

The following are the 3 Consultants hired by Zenascent in accordance with the
CKP merger and the Compensation owed to them respectively. They were an
important piece of bringing this deal together and keeping the parties
interested over the course of the negotiating period. There will be no further
compensation of any sort owed to the parties listed below by Zenascent.

Buffalo Consultants, LLC
32 Rainbow Ridge Drive
Livingston, NJ  07033
400,000 shares of Common Stock
Piggy Back Rights

                                       By:
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Buffalo Consultants, LLC

                                       By:
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Zenascent, Inc.

Sheldan Consulting LLC
110 West View Road
Short Hills, NJ  07078
400,000 shares of Common Stock
Piggy Back Rights
                                       By:
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Sheldan Consulting, LLC

                                       By:
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Zenascent, Inc.

CMR Capital Group, LLC
110 West View Road
Short Hills, NJ  07078
200,000 shares of Common Stock
$44,000
Piggy Back Rights
                                       By:
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          CMR Capital Group, LLC

                                       By:
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Zenascent, Inc.
o/¥-/5*

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA #14-13-00350-CR

STYLE: Jason Ray Bouchard vThe State of Texas

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed

DATE: December 16, 2014 Publish: No

OFFENSE: Capital Murder

COUNTY: Harris

th TRIAL COURT: 178"' District Court

TC CASE #:1374815

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Jason Ray Bouchard vThe State of Texas

CCA#

PRO SE Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

0/¥-/f

DATE: <r?(?//?/%Vr PC:

JUDGE: tftA UMjM*- PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

FOR REHEAF

JUDGE:

tING IN CCA IS:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of
ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 13, 2007



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                      
|Paritosh K. Choksi                          
|Executive Vice President of Managing Member,
|Principal Financial Officer of Registrant   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FILED IN5th COURT OF APPEALS      DALLAS, TEXAS4/14/2015 1:47:17 PM          LISA MATZ              Clerk

- NOTICE
- COC
- MNT
CAUSE NO. 12-14-00328-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DENNIS LYNCH, } APPEALED FROM 241ST DISTRICT COURT

APPELLANT

V. } IN AND FOR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, } SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

ORDER

Appellant is represented by Mr. Clifton Roberson, appointed counsel at trial and on appeal. 

Roberson informed this Court that he does not plan to represent Appellant in this cause. On March 23,

2015, the time to file appellant’s brief expired without a brief or a motion for extension of time. TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.6(a). Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b), counsel was notified on March 26, 2015, that his

brief was past due and was given until April 6, 2015, to file the brief or otherwise explain the delay. No

satisfactory response has been received.

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3), it is ORDERED that Honorable Jack Skeen Jr., Judge of

the 241st District Court of Smith County, Texas, shall immediately conduct a hearing to determine (1)

whether the appellant still desires to prosecute his appeal; (2) whether the appellant is indigent and either

needs counsel appointed, or appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal; or (3) if the appellant is not

indigent, whether a brief has not been completed because retained counsel has either abandoned the

appeal or because appellant has failed to make necessary arrangements for filing a brief; and (4) when

appellant’s counsel anticipates that the appellant’s brief, if a brief is to be filed, will be completed.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the judge shall (1) make appropriate findings as to the above

set forth issues and (2) cause a record of the proceedings to be prepared.

FILE COPY
It is ADDITIONALLY ORDERED that once findings are made as to the above set forth issues,

if appellant is indigent, the judge shall (1) take such measures as may be necessary to assure appellant’s

effective representation, which may include the appointment of new counsel and (2) make

recommendations to this Court regarding a proper filing date for the appellant’s brief.

It is FINALLY ORDERED that the supplemental clerk’s record (including any orders and

findings) and the reporter’s record of said hearing be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before May

8, 2015.

WITNESS the Honorable James T. Worthen, Chief Justice, Court of Appeals, 12th Court of

Appeals District, Tyler, Texas.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE at Tyler, Texas this 8th day of April

2015, A.D.

Respectfully yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: ______________________________

 Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF INTERIM PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**


**OF
      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E.
      Eugene Sharer, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





/s/
                E. Eugene SharerE.
                Eugene SharerInterim
                Principal Financial OfficerNovember
                19, 2008
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.2

1996 Stock Option Plan, Administrative Rules and Agreement under which officers 
of the Company are eligible to receive options to purchase an aggregate of 
1,331,000 shares (restated for the 2-for-1 stock split effective February 1998 
and the 10 percent common stock dividends effective in 1998, 1997 and 1996) of 
the Company's $2.50 par value common stock.  This 1996 Stock Option Plan, 
Administrative Rules and Agreement is incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q 
of Brenton Banks, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
     43
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00335

- CR

Thomas Edward Wildman
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 149th District Court of Brazoria County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 81761

- CR

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by

this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
July 15, 2021
Sait 

required to hold a hearing, see EDCR 2.23(c), and nothing in the record 

suggests that the district court factored appellant's nonattendance into its 

decision. Instead, the district court considered the motion, appellant's 

opposition thereto, even though it was untimely filed, and respondents' 

reply, along with papers and evidence submitted by the parties. Finally, 

to the extent that appellant contends that he has a viable cause of action 

based on respondents seizing and destroying his personal property, 

nothing in the record supports that assertion. Appellant pointed to 

testimony from his criminal hearing during which a detective testified 

that, along with a color copier, forged currency, and mail, which the police 

seized, appellant's hotel room contained "a couple of backpacks" containing 

"clothing" and "personal hygiene objects." Respondents disposed of the 

clothing and hygiene objects for health and safety reasons, and appellant 

cites to no authority to support that the disposal of those items was 

improper under the circumstances. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

V 

Gibbons 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e 

J. 

J. 
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge 

Carl Eric Krehnovi 

L. Kirk Williams 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1 94 7A e
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
DECEMBER 31, 1995 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          71,159
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         265,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            37,600,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                396,370,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     108,082,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       109,131,000
<LOANS>                                    918,901,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                 11,070,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,582,779,000
<DEPOSITS>                               1,361,943,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                43,607,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         19,518,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 38,178,000
<COMMON>                                    38,266,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  81,267,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,582,779,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             82,526,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           26,184,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             2,330,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           111,040,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          53,075,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,633,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       53,332,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,865,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (3,000)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             55,702,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,612,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  13,612,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,407,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.64
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,639,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 2,802,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               178,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              5,619,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            10,913,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                3,377,000
<RECOVERIES>                                 1,669,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           11,070,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        11,070,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING 

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND 

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE.

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT 

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S 

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT 

USDA, AMS, FVP, SCI

831 MITTEN ROAD, ROOM 200

BURLINGAME, CA 94010

PHONE: 650-552-9073

FAX: 650-552-9147

EQUIPMENT CATALOG
NECTARINE

Shape: lower limit “well formed” which is required in U.S. Fancy, U.S. Extra No. 1, and U.S. No. 1.

NECTARINES, C-1

SHAPE

MAY 1990 (Previously C-1, no date)
NECTARINES

2 Nectarines – D and E; 2 views of each.

Both Lower Limit Misshapen (But Not Badly Misshapen)

NECTARINES, C-2

SHAPE

MAY 1990 (Previously no date)
NECTARINE DEFECTS

1. Split pit – Injury. Healed crack 

is more than 1/4” but less than 

3/8” long. Score against U.S. No. 

1. Not borderline.

2. Split Pit – Serious Damage. 

Healed crack is more than 3/8” 

long. Not a limit.

3. Not Well Formed. Score as 

damage against the U.S. No. 1 

Grade. Not borderline.

NEC-CP-3

DEFECTS

MAY 1990 (Previously May 1972)
NECTARINES

SLIDE 191 -- RUSSETING
NECTARINES

SLIDE 193 -- RUSSETING
NECTARINES

SLIDE 194 – RUSSETING AND SPECKLING
NECTARINES

SLIDE 195 – RUSSETING AND GROWTH CRACK
NECTARINES

SLIDE 196 – STAINING AND RUSSETING
NECTARINES

SLIDE 197 – STAINING
NECTARINES

SLIDE 198 – SPECKLING
NECTARINES

SLIDE 199 -- STAINING
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 14, 2016

NO. 03-16-00078-CV

Florencio Cuetara, Appellant

v.

DSCH Capital Partners, LLC, d/b/a Far West Capital, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 19, 2015. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Appellant shall pay all 

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Independent Auditors' Consent


 

 Exhibit 10(i)

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT

 

To the Board of Directors of

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company

 



        We consent to the use in this Post Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registration Statement No. 333-01363 on Form N-4 of our
report dated February 15, 2002 for the Panorama Separate Account and of our report dual dated March 1, 2002 and March 9, 2002, respectively, on Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
explanatory paragraphs referring to the use of statutory accounting practices and the change of certain accounting practices as a result of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Insurance’s adoption of the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners’ Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual effective January 1, 2001, all of which practices differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America), appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Statement of Additional Information.


 

DELOITTE
& TOUCHE 
LLP

 

Hartford, Connecticut

April 25, 2002
National Organic Standards Board

Livestock Committee

Proposed Discussion Document

March 28, 2012

Introduction

Animal welfare is a basic principle of organic production. As the number of farmers in 

the United States decline, consumer concerns for farm animal care have increased. 

There are numerous animal welfare organizations and methods to verify animal welfare. 

The Livestock Committee believes that outcome based scores are the best measure of 

farm animal welfare. 

Background

The United States Congress anticipated the need to elaborate livestock standards in 

1990 when the Organic Foods Production Act was passed. The Humane Society of the 

United States played a central role in advocating for the passage of OFPA. It was 

understood at that time that animal welfare standards would eventually be developed. 

Several animal health and welfare practices were described in the Preamble 

accompanying the NOP Final Rule that organic livestock farmers must adhere to. 

Discussion

The Livestock Committee feels that outcome based standards are the best measure for 

assessing the health and well-being of livestock. The four major concerns for dairy 

cattle are: 

• Body condition 

• Locomotion 

• Cleanliness

• Injury and lesions

These measures are currently in use and have been well documented as welfare 

indicators in the livestock industry. Body condition is affected by stage of lactation and 

diet. Cows generally score less than 2 only if they are ill. Locomotion score may be 2 or 

greater if there is an injury. When cattle have a clean, dry place to lie down the majority 

of the herd will be clean. Grazing cattle generally have safe and spacious environments 

which minimize injuries and lesions. The Livestock Committee will discuss what is 

considered normal and acceptable for each of these measures in the future. Other 

welfare measures on the tally sheet include:

LC 1 outcome score tally sheet
• Cattle affected with mange or lice

• Cattle with broken tails 

• Ammonia concentration in buildings

• Other items that may need attention 

Cattle may be affected with mange and lice during the winter months. This is an 

uncomfortable condition and requires immediate treatment. Broken tails are uncommon 

and are generally the result of an accident. High numbers indicate a problem with 

animal handling or the farm environment. Ammonia smell in buildings may indicate a 

lack of ventilation.

The photographs and descriptions on the dairy score card clearly show the difference 

between scores and have a corresponding spot on the tally sheet. The shaded boxes 

on the tally sheet represent areas of concern. Inspectors should view all of the cows 

and young stock but tally only the animals that would score in a shaded box. This 

identifies any issues that may need to be addressed and minimizes the amount of 

additional inspection time. 

Proposed Materials

I. Dairy auditor tally sheet

II. Dairy Scorecard

Committee Vote

Motion: Wendy Fulwider Second: Colehour Bondera

Yes: 8 No: 0 Absent: 0 Abstain: 0 Recuse: 0 

LC 2 outcome score tally sheet
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

I, Geoffrey G. Meyers, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Manor Care, Inc. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
             ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
             Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
             requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
             Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and result of
             operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
             the Report.

/s/ Geoffrey G. Meyers

Geoffrey G. Meyers
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2002

                                       29
Administrative Offices Civil and Family Division Criminal Division Jury Office (512) 854

- 9457 (512) 854

- 9457 (512) 854

- 9420 (512) 854

- 9669

fax: 854

- 4744 fax: 854

- 9549 fax: 854

- 4566 fax: 854

- 4457 

## Velva L. Price

Travis County District Clerk
Travis County Courthouse Complex

P.O. Box 679003 Austin, Texas 78767

- 9003

March 23, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle Third Court of Appeals

P.O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711

- 2547

Dear Mr. Kyle

,

A clerk’s recor d in cause number, D

- 1

- GV

- 14

- 00 0227 and Court of Appeals number

03

- 5 4

- 00 093

- CV

, styled, The City of Houston, Texas vs Greg Abbott, et al is due in your office today, March 23, 2015 . This office has not received payment for this record as of today ; howeve r, the appellant is going to expedite the payment. T herefore

, I am request ing an extension for filing. Thank you for your consideration.

If you have any questions

, please contact me at (512) 854

- 5835

.

Sincerely,

Bari Henson Deputy Court Clerk II (512) 854

- 5835
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We have issued our reports dated June 3, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Capital Southwest Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2015. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Capital Southwest Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-177433, effective October 21, 2011; File No. 333-177432, effective October 21, 2011; File No. 333-118681, effective August 31, 2004).





/s/ Grant Thornton LLP



Dallas, Texas

June 3, 2015

 

 



---

---