**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK)**  **(Renewal) 1. Identification of the Information Collection**  **1(a) Title of the Information Collection** NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK) (Renewal), EPA I CR Number 2079.05 , OMB Control Number 2060

- 0541

. **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating were : proposed on January 15, 2003 , promulgated on November 13, 2003 , and last

- amended on April 20 , 2006 . These regulations apply to both existing and new facilities in this source category that : 1) use 5,700 liters (1,500 gallons) or more of coatings per ye ar and ; 2) constitute a major source of hazardous air pollutant (HAP)

. The m etal can surface coating source category include s any facilities that either coat or print or fabricate metal cans and c an parts (e.g., metal ends for composite cans). The source category also includes the coating/printing of metal decorative tins, crowns, and closures, except for coil coating. Regulated activities include the coating/printing of metal sheets for subsequent processing into cans or can parts, but not the coating of metal coils for cans or can parts. New facilities include those that commenced construction or reconstruction after the date of proposal. This information is being collected to assure complianc e with 40 CFR part 63 , subpart KKKK

. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by

the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility , or any period during which the monitoring sy stem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are req

uired of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP

. Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance rep orts, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority

. In the event that there is no such delegated authority , the reports are sent directl y to the U

. S

. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office. Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of one affected facility at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site). Over the next three ye ars, an average of 71 respondents per ye ar will be subject to the se standard s , and no additional respondents per year will become subject to the se standard s
.2

The Office of Management and Budget ( OMB ) approved the currentl y active Information Collection Request ( IC R) without any “ Terms of Clearance. ”
The “Affected Public” is defined as either owners or operators of metal can manufacturing facilities

. The “burden ” to the Affected Public may be found below in Table 1 : Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK) ( Renewal)

. The burden to the Federal Government is attributed entirel y to work performed b y either F ederal emplo ye es or government contractor s
. This burden may

be found be low in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK) (Renewal)

. **2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for**  **the Collection** The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory

of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. Inaddition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any

owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports;

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Admini strator may reasonabl y require. In the Administrator's judgment, HAP emissions from metal can manufacturing operations either cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably

be anticipated to endanger public health and/ or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP were promulgated for this source category

at 40 CFR part 63, subpart KKKK

. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data** The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure s compliance with the applicable regulations which where promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings.3

Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’ s initial capability to comply

with the emission standard s . Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard s at all times. The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the A gency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properl y installed and the standard s are being met. The p erformance test may also be observed. The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility , verify operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations. **3. Non**
**- duplication,**  **Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria** The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 63, subpart KKKK. **3(a) Non**
**- duplication**  If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, duplication does not exist. **3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB** An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published in the Federal Register (78 FR 33409 ) on June 4, 2013

. No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register

. **3(c) Consultations** The Agency

has consulted industry

experts and internal data sources to project the number of affected facilities and industry growth over the next three years. The primary source of information as reported by industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information Sy stem (OTIS) which is operated and maintained b y EPA’s Office of Compliance. OTI S is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data. The growth rate for industry is based on our consultations with the Agency ’s internal industry experts. Industry trade associations and other intere sted parties were provided an o pportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard as it was being developed and the standard4

has been previously

reviewed to determine the minimum information needed for compliance purposes. In developing this I CR, we contacted : 1) the Can Manufacturers Institute , at (202) 232

- 4677 ; and 2) the American Coatings Assoc iation , at (202) 462

- 6272. It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the first Federal Register notice. In this case, no comments were received. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection**  Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequentl y, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility

of detecting violations would be less likely

. **3(e) General Guidelines**
These reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated b y OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five ye ar records retention requirement is consistent with the Part 70 permit program and the five

- ye ar statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. The retention of records for five

- ye ars allow s EPA to establish the compliance history of a source , any pattern of non - compliance and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond five ye ars. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records

. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information su

bmitted to the Agency

for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). **3(g) Sensitive Questions**
The reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive questions.5

**4. The Respondents and the Information Requested**  **4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes** The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are owners or operators of metal can manufacturing facilities . The United States Standard Industrial Classification ( SI C ) code s and corresponding North American Industry Classification System (NAI CS ) codes are presented in the following table.

**Standard (**  **40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK )**  **SIC Codes NAICS Codes**  Metal Can Manufacturing 3411 332431 Metal Crown, Closure, and Other Metal Stamping (except Automotive) 3466 33211 9
Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers 3999 332812

All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing 3497 332999

**4(b) Information**  **Requested (i) Data Items** 
In this ICR , all the data that is recorded or reported is required b y the NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR P art 63, S ubpart KKKK). A source must make the following reports:

**Notification s**  Initial notification 63.3510(b), 63.5(d), 63.9(b) Notification of compliance status 63.3510(c), 63.9(h) Notification of construction or reconstruction 63.3510(a), 63.5 Notification of actual startup 63.3510(a), 63.9(b) Notification of performance test 63.3510(a), 63.7(b), 63.8(e), 63.9(e)6 **Reports** Semiannual report 63.3511(a) Excess emissions report 63.3511(a)(4

- 8) Report of performance test 63.3511(b) Startup, shutdown, malfunction report 63.3511(c) A source must keep the following records: **Recordkeeping** Five ye ar retention of records 63.3513(b), 63.10(b) Material formulation data 63.3512(b) Records of HAP content calculations 63.3512(c) Copies of notifications and reports 63.3512(a) Records of names of materials used 63.3512(d) HAP fractions in each material used 63.3512(e) Coating solids fraction in each material used 63.3512(f) Density of materials used 63.3512(g) Documentation of waste material shipped offsite 63.3512(h) Documentation of deviations 63.3512(i) Start up, shutdown, and malfunction plan/records 63.3512(j), 63.6(e) Records of continuous compliance with operating limits 63.3512(j) Documentation of capture sy stem efficiency determination 63.3512(j) Documentation of add

- on control device destruction or removal efficiency determination 63.3512(j) Documentation of control device performance tests 63.3512(j), 63.10(b) Determination of capture sy stem and add

- on control operating limits 63.3512(j) Work practice plan/records 63.3512(j)
Electronic Reporting Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at a plant site.7

Also, regulatory

agencies in cooperation with th e respondents continue to create reporting s ys tem s to transmit data electronically . However, electronic reporting s ys tems are still not widely used. At this time, it is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the respon dents use electronic reporting.

**(ii) Respondent Activities**

**Respondent Activities**  Read instructions. Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate CMS for temperature, for gas flow, or for pressure drop for oxidizer, carbon adsorber, condenser, concentrator, or capture s ys tem. Perform initial performance test, Reference Method 1, 1A, 2, 2A, 2C, 2D, 2F, 2G, 3, 3A, 3B, 4, 24, 25, 25A, 204, 204A, 204B, 204C, 204D, 204E, 204F, 311, or ASTM Method D1475

- 98, D2697

- 86, D6093

- 97 test, and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required to be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. Currently sources are using monitoring and reporting equipment that provide parameter data in an automated way ( e.g., continuous parameter monitoring s ys tem) . Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the data, this ty pe of monitoring equipment has significantl y reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and**  **Information Management 5(a) Agency Activities**  EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis,8

storage, and distribution of the required information. **Agency Activities** Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Review notifications and reports including: performance test reports; excess emissions reports; startup, shutdown, malfunction plan; and the CMS quality control plan. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information Sy stem ( OTI S )

. **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management**  Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated. Performance test reports are used b y the Agency to discern a source ’ s initial capability to comply with the emission standard. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated an d published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.
In formation contained in the reports is entered into OTI S which is operated and maintained by

EPA's Office of Compliance. OT IS is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses the OTI S for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement b y local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. The records required b y this regulatio n must be retained by the owner/operator for five ye ars. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility** A majority

of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation. Small entities were afforded extensive flexibi lity in demonstrating compliance through compliance options that give small entities flexibility in choosing the most cost effective and least burdensome alternative for their operation. During rulemaking for subpart KKKK, EPA identified 13 small businesses that are subject to th is rule. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the types of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these to be the minimum requirements needed to9

ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larger businesses can use economie s of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced. **5(d) Collection Schedule** The specific frequency

for each information collection activity within this request is shown below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP fo r Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK) (Renewal)

. **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection** Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Wherever appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Numb er. **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden** The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirement s is estimated to be 27,517 hours ( Total Labor Hours from Table 1 below). These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously

- approved ICR, and any comments received. **6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  This I CR uses the following labor rates: Managerial $1 2 2

. 4 9 ($5 8

. 3 3 + 110%) Technical $ 10 1

. 2 8 ($4 8

. 2 3 + 110%) Clerical $ 50

. 80 ($2 4

. 19 + 110%) These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2012 , “ Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. ” The rates are from column 1, “ Total compensation. ” The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed b y private industry

.10 **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs**  This section covers the costs associated with all types of continuous monitoring equipment (e.g., CEMS and continuous parameter monitors). The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard are both labor costs , which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR , and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/startup costs are one time costs when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitors and other costs such as photocopying and postage.

**(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs Capital/Startup vs. Operation**  **and Maintenance (O&M) Costs** (A) Continuous Monitoring Device (B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent (C)

Number of New Respondents (D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) (E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent (F)

Number of Respondents with O&M (G)

Total O&M, (E X F)

CEM $16,000 0 $0 $1,200 71 $85,200 The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are $ 0 . This is the total o f column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this I CR are $ 85,200

. This is the total of column G. The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $ 85,200

. The continuous monitoring costs that are included in this section consist only of those capital/start

- up and O&M costs that a source incurs as a result of the standard. Some continuous monitoring costs may not be included in this section. For instance, if a particular industry ty picall y utilizes a control device that must have a continuous monitor (e.g., temperature, pressure drop, etc.) to function properl y, and the recordation of additional measurements beyond the minimum are required b y the standard, then there is no capital/startup or O & M cost, but there is a lab or cost to record the additional readings. Such a cost would not appear in this section, but in the indus try burden Section 6 (d) below. **6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost** The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with anal ys is of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the examination of records maint ained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information.11

The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 125,208

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows: Managerial $ 6 2.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 3 8. 92 + 60% ) Technical $ 4 6

. 21 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 28. 88 + 60% ) Clerical $2 5.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15. 63 + 60% ) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) , 20 1 2 General Schedule , which excludes locality , rates of pay

. The rates have been increased b y 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees
. Details upon which this estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK)

. **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** Based on our research for this I CR, approximately 71 existing respondents will be subject to the se standard s on an average over the next three years . It is estimated that no additional respondents per ye ar will become subject. The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below, is 71 per year. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three ye ars covered b y this IC R. **Number of Respondents**

Year (A) Number of Ne w Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports (D) Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

1 0 71 0 0 71
2 0 71 0 0 71 3 0 71 0 0 71 Average 0 71 0 0 71
C olumn D is subtracted to avoid double

- counting respondents

. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three ye ar period of this ICR is 71. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table:12 **Total Annual Responses** (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D

Initial notification 0 1 0 0 Notification of compliance status 0 1 0 0 Notification of construction/reconstruction 0 1 0 0 Notification of actual startup 0 1 0 0 Notification of performance test 0 1.2 0 0 Report of performance test 0 1.2 0 0 Semiannual report 71 2 0 142 Excess emissions report 71 2 0 142 Startup, shutdown, malfunction report 18 1 0 18 **Total 302**  The number of Total Annual Responses is 302. The total annual labor costs are $ 3,173,600

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK) (Renewal). **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables** The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Table s 1 and 2 below , respectively , and summarized below. **(i) Respondent Tally** The total annual labor hours are 27,517 hours at a cost of $3,173,600

. Details regarding these estimates may

be found below in Table 1 : Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK) (Renewal). Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 91 hours per response

. The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $85,200

. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.
**(ii) The Agency Tally** 13

The average annual Agency burden and cost over the next three years is estimated to be 2,778 labor hours at a cost of $125,208 ;s ee below Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK) (Renewal). **6( f**  **) Reasons**  **for Change in Burden** There is no change in the labor hours in this I CR compared to the previous ICR. This is due to two considerations: (1) the regulations have not changed over the past three ye ars and are not anticipated to change over the next three ye ars; and (2) the growth rate for the respondents is very low, negative or non

- existent. Therefore, the labor hours in the previous I CR reflect the current burden to the respondents and are reiterated in this I CR. However, there is an adjustment increas e in the respondent cost due to labor rate increases. **6(g) Burden Statement** The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 91 hours per response. “ Burden ” means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to compl y with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train pers onnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for t his I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2013

- 0345

. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/ , which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically

. When in the sy stem , select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), WJC West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:3 0 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone14

number for the docket center i s (202) 566

- 17 52

. Also, you can send comments to the Office of In formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2013

- 0345 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0541 in any correspondence.
**Pa rt B of the Supporting Statement**  This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.15

**Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost** 

**– NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63,**  **Subpart KKKK) (Renewal)** 

**Burden Item A**  **B C**  **D E**  **F G**  **H P**  **erson hours per**  **occurrence No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **Technical**

**person -**  **hours per respondent**  **per year (AxB)**  **Respondents**

**per year**  **a Technical** 

**hours per year**  **(CxD) Managem**  **ent**

**hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) Clerical** 

**hours per year**  **(Ex0.10) Total cost** 

**per year b**  **($)**

1. Reporting Requirements a. Read rule s and instructions 4 1 4 71 284 14.2 28.4 $ 37,668.06 b. Compile and process data 4 4 16 71 1,136 56.8 113.6 $ 150,672.22 c. Write reports i. Initial notification 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $ 0 ii. Notification of compliance status 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $ 0 iii. Notification of construction/reconstruction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $ 0 iv. Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $ 0 v. Notification of performance test c 2 1.2 2.4 0 0 0 0 $ 0 vi. Report of performance test c 10 1.2 12 0 0 0 0 $ 0 vii. Semiannual report e 6 2 12 71 852 42.6 85.2 $ 113,004.17 viii. Excess emissions report f 2 2 4 71 284 14.2 28.4 $ 37,668.06 ix. Startup, shutdown, malfunction report d 2 1 2 18 36 1.8 3.6 $ 4,774.82 **Subtotal for Reporting**  **Requirements 2,98**  **0.8 $**  **343,787 .33**  2. Recordkeeping requirements a. Read rule s and instructions 4 1 4 71 284 14.2 28.4 $ 37,668.06 b. Plan activities 12 1 12 71 852 42.6 85.2 $ 113,004.17 c. Implement activities 12 1 12 71 852 42.6 85.2 $ 113,004.17 d. Maintain record system for material used 20 1 20 71 1,420 71 142 $ 188,340.28 e. Time to enter information i. Material usage g 0.5 365 182.5 71 12,957.5 647.88 1,295.75 $ 1,718,605.06 ii. Compliance calculation h 2 12 24 71 1,704 85.2 170.4 $ 226,008.34 f. Time to train personnel 10 1 10 71 710 35.5 71 $ 94,170.14 g. Store, file, and maintain records h 2 12 24 71 1,704 85.2 170.4 $ 226,008.34 h. Retrieve records/reports i 1 12 12 71 852 42.6 85.2 $ 113,004.17 **Subtotal for Recordkeeping**  **Requirements 24,53**  **5.83 $**  **2,829,81 2.73** 16

**Burden Item A**  **B C**  **D E**  **F G**  **H P**  **erson hours per**  **occurrence No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **Technical**

**person -**  **hours per respondent**  **per year (AxB)**  **Respondents**

**per year**  **a Technical** 

**hours per year**  **(CxD) Managem**  **ent**

**hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) Clerical** 

**hours per year**  **(Ex0.10) Total cost** 

**per year b**  **($)**

**TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST ( rounded** **) 27,517**  **$ 3,173,600** 
**Assu mptions**  **:** a We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be subject to the rule will be 71 existing sources. There will be no additional sources over the thr ee - year period of this ICR. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $101.28 for technical, $122.49 for managerial, and $50.80 for clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2012 , “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry gro up.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those em ployed by private industry.
c This ICR assumes a re

- test rate of 20 percent. d This ICR assumes twenty

- five percent of facilities use add

- on controls and submit startup, shutdown, malfunction reports once per year.
e We have assumed that it will take each respondent 2 hours two time per year to compile semiannual reports. f We have assumed that each respondent will take two hours two time per year to complete the excess emissions report. g We have assumed that each respondent will take 0.5 hours 365 times per year to enter material usa ge. h We have assumed that each respondent will take 2 hours once per month to complete task. i We have assumed that each respondent will take 1 hour once per month to retrieve records/reports.17

**Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost**

**– NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 63,**  **Subpart KKKK) (Renewal)** 

**Activity A**  **B C**  **D E**  **F G**  **H EPA**  **hours per**  **occurrence No. of** 

**occurrences per year**  **EPA**

**h ours per**  **respondent per year**  **(AxB) Plants**  **per**

**year a**  **Technical**

**hours per year**  **(CxD) Managem**  **ent**

**hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) Clerical** 

**hours per year**  **(Ex0.10) Total cost** 

**per year b**  **($)**

1. Initial performance test 24 1 24 0 0 0 0 $ 0 2. Repeat performance test 24 0.2 5 0 0 0 0 $ 0 3. Report review a
. Initial notification 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 $ 0 b

. Notification of performance test 8 1.2 10 0 0 0 0 $ 0 c
. Notification of compliance status 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 $ 0 d

. Notification of construction/reconstruction 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 $ 0 e
. Notification of actual startup 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 $ 0 f

. Report of performance test 8 1.2 10 0 0 0 0 $ 0 g
. Semiannual report c 12 2 24 71 1,704 85.2 170.4 $ 88,308.95 h

. Excess emissions report d 4 2 8 71 568 28.4 56.8 $ 29,436.32 i

. Startup, shutdown, malfunction report e 8 1 8 18 144 7.2 14.4 $ 7,462.73 **TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST ( rounded** **) 2,778**  **$ 125,208**  Notes and Assumptions:
a We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be subject to the rule will be 71 existing sources. There will be no additional sources over the thr ee - year period of this ICR. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $46.21 for techni cal, $62.27 for managerial, and $25.01 for clerical labor. These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2011 General Schedule, which excludes locality , rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.
c We have assumed that it will take each respondent 12 hours two time per year to review the semiannual report. d We have assumed that each respondent will take 4 hours two time per year to review the excess emissions report.
e We have assumed that 25 percent of respondents will each take 8 hours one time per year to review the startup, shutdown, malf unction report.