alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 21.       Subsidiaries of Registrant
                  --------------------------


                                                      Percentage of Voting
                                                      Securities of Sub-
                                                      sidiaries Owned by
                                    Place of          Registrant as of
Name                             Incorporation        December 31, 1995 (1)(2)
----                             -------------        ------------------------

Charles Burton
Builder, Inc.                       Maryland                100%

Town Center                         District of
Management Corp.                    Columbia                100%

Bresler & Reiner
Investment Co., Inc.                Delaware                100%

Maplewood Manor
Convalescent Center, 
Inc.                                Pennsylvania            100%

Allentown Road
Motel Corporation                   Maryland                100%

Uptown Hotel Corp.                  Maryland                100%

WMC Management Co., Inc.            District of
                                    Columbia                100%

Sudley Corporation                  Virginia                100%


(1)   The names of certain subsidiaries have been omitted because, considered 
      in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they do not constitute a 
      significant subsidiary.

(2)   Included in the consolidated financial statements as significant 
      subsidiaries.

                                     -62-
### Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion). Furthermore,

Mayo stipulated to the sentence he received in his guilty plea agreement. Therefore, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.



# So, pea Hardesty Douglas

cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 J. J.

(C) 1947A
#### Schorr Brothers Development Corp. et al., Plaintiffs, v Continental Insurance Company et al., Defendants, and Citi Drywall, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. George Marchetti Brokerage, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

—In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the third-party defendant George Marchetti Brokerage, Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), entered June 21, 1989, as, in effect, denied its cross motion to sever the third-party action.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the cross motion is granted to the extent that it is directed that the third-party action be tried separately.

It has long been recognized that it is inherently prejudicial to third-party defendant insurers to have the issue of insurance coverage tried before the jury that considers the underlying liability claims *(see, Kelly v Yannotti,*4 NY2d 603; *Dreizen v Morris I. Stoler, Inc.,*98 AD2d 759; *Mancuso v Bellerive,*50 AD2d 802; *Schwartz v Woodner & Co.,*40 AD2d 1027). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# TIME AND DATE:

9 a.m. (Eastern Time) April 30, 2012.

# PLACE:

10th Floor Training Room, 77 K Street NE., Washington, DC 20002.

# STATUS:

Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Parts Open to the Public

1. Approval of the Minutes of the March 26, 2012 Board Member Meeting

2. Approval of the Minutes of the November 15, 2011 ETAC Meeting

3. Monthly Participant Activity Report

4. Legislative Report

5. Discussion on Automatically Increasing Participant Contributions

6. Quarterly Investment Policy Review

7. Discussion of International Fund Index

8. Vendor Financial Review

9. Annual Financial Audit Report

10. Participant Survey Report

11. Update on Deployment of Roth Feature

## Parts Closed to the Public

12. Security

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

Dated: April 20, 2012.

Megan G. Grumbine,

Deputy General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-9966 Filed 4-20-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1391 

To provide regulatory relief for conventional marginally producing oil and 

gas wells from the Environmental Protection Agency’s ‘‘Methane Rule’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2019 

Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide regulatory relief for conventional marginally producing oil and gas wells from the Environmental Protection Agency’s ‘‘Methane Rule’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Methane Rule Relief 

5 Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF METHANE RULE. 

7 The final rule titled ‘‘Oil and Natural Gas Sector: 

8 Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modi9 fied Sources’’ (81 Fed. Reg. 35824, June 3, 2016), and 

10 the document titled ‘‘Control Techniques Guidelines for 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1391 IH

1 the Oil and Natural Gas Industry’’ (October 2016), pub2 lished by the Environmental Protection Agency, shall not 

3 apply with respect to— 

4 (1) any oil well that has a maximum daily aver5 age oil production, during any 12-month consecutive 

6 time period, that does not exceed 15 barrels of oil 

7 per day; 

8 (2) any natural gas well that has a maximum 

9 daily average gas production, during any 12-month 

10 consecutive time period, that does not exceed 90,000 

11 cubic feet per day; or 

12 (3) any emissions source covered by the rule 

13 that is associated with an oil well described in para14 graph (1) or a natural gas well described in para15 graph (2). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

Thursday, April 26, 2012 at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting of April 12, 2012

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-07: Feinstein for Senate

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-08: Repledge

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-09: Points for Politics, LLC

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-10: Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, Inc.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-11: Free Speech

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-12: Dunkin' Brands, Inc.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-13: Physicians Hospitals of America

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-14: Shaun McCutcheon 

Management and Administrative Matters

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2012-9861 Filed 4-20-12; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
PETITIONER

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

RESPONDENT . FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 14 2015 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PDR \ •

Abel Acosta, Clerk

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

Comes now, 1-V/frS fVfa/y t&tttA , Petitioner, and files this motion

for an extension of sixty (60) days in which to file a Petition for Discretionary

Review. In support ofthis motion, Petitioner shows the Court the following:

NO. mi i

I.

IN THE TEXAS COURT

OF

CRIMINAL APPEALS

*h

The Petitioner was convicted in the ♦<?■

the/ok^t: County, Texas of

District Court of

the offense of

in Cause No. l8l"H , styled The

State of Texas vs. M/fa Utah t>ttt<A The Petitioner appealed to the

Court of Appeals, Supreme Judicial District, Appeal No.

/A ^3-00311 -tA . The case was affirmed on

Suulst/f t>4 H^IqU^^a

II.

The present deadline for filing the Petition for Discretionary Review is

Ps@!\) >o ^0)5 . The Petitioner has not requested any extension prior to this

request.

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 13 2015

Abel Acoeta, Clerk

REC'D IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court of Appeals District

APR 0 6 2015

V-A^*r^»«.-==J>W*«-J.-'X.

'••-TYLER t&CAS .CATHY.S.LUSK, CLERK
III.

Petitioner's request for an extension is based upon the following facts:

Petitioner was not informed of the decision of the Court of Appeals in affirming

his case until Wt\tt/h ^b^OlS . Since that time Petitioner has been attempting

to gain legal representation in this matter. His attorney on the appeal,

P\\[£-y\ !/• no.15 __, has informed Petitioner that he will not

.represent him on the Petition for Discretionary Review.

WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays this Court grant this motion and extend

the deadline for filing the Petition for Discretionary Review in Cause No.

i*°n i to jAfiq_j%^i£_.

Respectfully submitted,

Petitioner Pro Se

TDCJ#

Texas Department of Criminal Justice
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Uiil'is Me/ih Crfc-ei do hereby certify that a true and correct copy

of the above and foregoing Motion for Extension of Time to File a Petition for

Discretionary Review, has been forwarded by United States Mail, postage

prepaid, first class, to the State Prosecuting Attorney, P. O. Box 12405, Austin,

TX 78711, and the District Attorney for t-ht/c^t County,

'feJM^- on this the _M

day ofA^y-4^ . 20$JT.

}JJ$X&hx^^

Petitioner Pro Se
DateiH' -&

Ms. Louise Pearson, Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals

PO Box 12308

Austin, TX 78711

Dear Ms. Pearson:

Enclosed please find my pro se Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time

to File a Petition for Discretionary Review. Please file this Motion with the

papers ofthis case and bring it to the attention ofthe Court.

Please date-stamp this letter and return it to me at my address shown

below.

I also request that you notify ine of the Court's ruling on my Motion. <

Sincerely,

^i"J^ £?/U—

Petitioner Pro Se

TDCJ# maW

Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Unit: TA HW>'

Address: Soo?Y*\ *t££»s+

&/<>vini/ec$J)c1<<>%0i
ffmi

\. % '..' \ \ \

•SI

3o

<3-

o- V O

~~- V-

"v

X

O; •o WA **

-?-'• ^r ~S~ *=*>

•^

^

0 •»

€

2 VO

J2. 4-

*3

S.

vo

rcri

- - K-

'•.I
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26


                             IRREVOCABLE UNDERTAKING

To:      Transworld Healthcare (UK) Limited (the "COMPANY")
         Stone Business Park
         Brooms Road, Stone
         Staffordshire ST15 0TL

         Transworld Healthcare Inc.
         555 Madison Avenue
         New York, NY 10022

         Triumph Partners III, L.P.
         28 State Street
         37th Floor
         Boston, MA 02109

                                                                  April 22, 2002

Dear Sirs,

1.   UNDERTAKING

     I, the undersigned, upon issue to me of 684,258 shares of common stock of
     Transworld Healthcare Inc., hereby irrevocably and unconditionally
     undertake not to exercise any rights attaching, now or in the future
     (including any rights in respect of voting, conversion, transfer or
     otherwise), to the redeemable shares of 0.01p each in the capital of the
     Company held by me (the "REDEEMABLE SHARES") until such time as any offer
     is made by the Company to purchase or redeem such Redeemable Shares at
     their nominal value (the "OFFER") and in such event, I hereby agree that I
     will accept the Offer and will exercise such rights in order to comply with
     the terms of the Offer. For the avoidance of doubt, if the Offer is made
     but the related purchase or redemption is not completed for any reason, I
     hereby irrevocably and unconditionally undertake not to exercise any rights
     attaching, now or in the future (including any rights in respect of voting,
     conversion, transfer or otherwise), to the Redeemable Shares.

2.   GOVERNING LAW AND SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION

     This undertaking (and any dispute, controversy, proceedings or claim of
     whatever nature arising out of or in any way relating to this undertaking
     or its formation) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
     English law.


                                      -1-
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26




Signed as a deed            )
by TIMOTHY AITKEN           )     /s/ Timothy Aitken
in the presence of          )

Witness Name: GRAHAM NEWTON       /s/ Graham Newton

Address: 59 BOTTELS ROAD
         WARBOYS
         CAMBS
         PEZB LRZ
         England
























     [Signature page to Irrevocable Undertaking delivered by Timothy Aitken]

                                      -2-
April 16, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF D.T. JR., A CHILD

NO. 14-14-01003-CV

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed 

November 21, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected 

the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court 

below AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
1517 WEST FRONT STREET  SUITE 354  TYLER, TX 75702  TEL: 903-593-8471  FAX: 903-593-2193

Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van 

Zandt and Wood Counties

www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us

CHIEF JUSTICE

JAMES T. WORTHEN

JUSTICES

BRIAN HOYLE

GREG NEELEY

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

CLERK

CATHY S. LUSK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

MARGARET HUSSEY

April 13, 2015

Ms. Lois Rogers

District Clerk, Smith County

Courthouse, Suite 204

100 North Broadway Avenue

Tyler, TX 75702-7201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 12-13-00033-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 114-0770-12

Style: Larry Joe Smith

v.

The State of Texas

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the 

Mandate issued in the above cause. When the District or County Clerk has executed the 

Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the 

information below and to return the attached copy to this office.

Very truly yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

C

C

:

Mr. Austin R. Jackson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Aaron Rediker (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mandate executed on __14th day of __APRIL______________, 2015.

Brief explanation of action taken: ____SCANNED__________________________________

______________________LINDA RHYMES___________________________District/County Clerk

FILE COPY FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/14/2015 10:13:43 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000166

31-MAY-2017

08:16 AM
United States 

Department of 

Agriculture

United States 

Department of 

Agriculture

Market News to improve the quality, 

customization, and accessibility of our 

data. This platform gives you faster, 

easier, and greater access to data and 

reports in one easy-to-use tool. 

DATA 

MY MARKET NEWS 

mymarketnews.ams.usda.gov 

USDA Market News publishes market information 

for hundreds of agricultural commodities. 

Market News information promotes market 

transparency and helps farmers and 

businesses make informed decisions. 

In 2018, Market News launched My public 

Fine-tune datasets to compare 

price and volume trends over time and 

regionally. 

Download customized datasets as CSV, XML or 

Zip files. 

New, coming spring 2021: access market reports and 

datasets for specialty crops. 

standard 

REPORTS 

Access all standard reports. 

New: pull current and historical 

data from reports simultaneously. 

Easily download customized 

data into commonly used 

spreadsheet software. 

Subscribe to have your 

favorite market reports 

delivered to your 

inbox when they 

publish. API 

application 

programming 

interface 

Automatically download large 

datasets in custom formats after 

initial setup 

Contact mars@usda.gov for FAQs, webinars, tutorials, questions or to schedule a demo. 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 

Agricultural Marketing Service, 2020.
----

|   | a. | complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition of the Company at May 31, 2009, and the      results of the Company’s operations for the quarter ended May 31,      2009. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |   |   |   |                                                                              |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  July      24, 2009 |   |   |   | /s/      Sharon Farris                                                            |
|                                |   |   |   |                                                                              |
|                                |   |   |   | Sharon      Farris                                                                |
|                                |   |   |   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial    Officer |

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

C.B., the mother

, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES , and GUARDIAN AD LITEM,

Appellee s

.

No s . 4D 19

- 3292 and 4D19

- 3293

[ May 7, 2020 ]

Consolidated a ppeal s from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert B. Meadows , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 56

- 2018

- DP

- 000144 and 56

- 2018

- DP

- 000215

.
Valarie Linnen, Special Assistant Regional Counsel, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Andre w Feige nbaum, Children ’ s Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for appellee , Department of Children and Families

.
Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Laura J. Lee, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Florida Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for appellee, Guardian Ad Litem.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , G ERBER and F ORST , JJ., conc ur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 17, 2015

s0414

Order 

Clerk

April 17, 2015

151119

DARYL R. WATERS,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 151119

BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and 

relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested 

relief.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,857
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,075
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (417)
<INVENTORY>                                     23,884
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,980
<PP&E>                                          12,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,873)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,602
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,853
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,996
<SALES>                                         87,595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,595
<CGS>                                           56,424
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,869
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,687
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,126
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,561
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,561
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34


</TABLE>