alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                       CAPSTEAD SECURITIES CORPORATION IV
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capstead Securities Corporation IV
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Andrew F. Jacobs, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 5, 2003                  By:  /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBS
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Andrew F. Jacobs
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive
                                         Officer and President





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capstead Securities Corporation IV
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Phillip A. Reinsch, Senior Vice President - Control of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 5, 2003                  By:  /s/ PHILLIP A.REINSCH
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Phillip A. Reinsch
                                         Senior Vice President - Control
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of White Electronic Designs
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September
27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Roger A. Derse, Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Date: December 16, 2004 /s/Roger A. DerseRoger A. DerseVice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ames True Temper, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, David M. Nuti, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ David M. Nuti
David M. Nuti
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 12, 2008

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.3 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of White Electronic Designs Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hamid Shokrgozar, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to White Electronic Designs Corporation and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. Date: February 7, 2005 /s/Hamid ShokrgozarHamid ShokrgozarChief Executive Officer
H. R. 1252 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6531 Van 

Nuys Boulevard in Van Nuys, California, as the ‘‘Marilyn Monroe Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MARILYN MONROE POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard in Van Nuys, California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Marilyn Monroe 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Marilyn Monroe Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-12-0125 SAT Date: 1/10/2012 Print Date: 12/2/2013

Related cases : Health related cases: Ecotox related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 3 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1-3 1-3 3

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: N o Commen t Keywords : Keywords: SOLV IRR SOLV NEURO PNEUMONIA LIVER KIDNEY BLOOD DEVEL REPRO IMMUNO MUTA ONCOSummary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-12-0125 FATE:

POTW removal (%) = 0-90 via sorption, stripping and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk->mo Sorption to soils/sediments = low - v.strong PBT Potential: P1B1-P3B3 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - rapid

Health : Health Summary: ( N ote: The PMN substance can range in structure from high molecular weight, to low molecular weight Concerns reflect the worst case PMN constituents.) Absorption of the high molecular weight constituents is nil all routes, while absorption of the low molecualr weight is good all routes, based on physical/chemical p roperties and analogs. There are concerns for solvent irritation and solvent neurotoxicity, pneumonia, liver, kidney, and blood toxicities, developmental and reproductive toxicities, immunotoxicity, mutagenicity, and oncogenicity, based on

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value *
algal

_ chronic value *
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; SAR chemical class = MW 483 (representative structure); p H7; effective concentrationsbased on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs neutral organic chemicals SAR Class Ecotox Category N eutral Organics
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
June 23,

MEMOR

STANDA

FROM:

 

 

SUBJEC

The NOP

expertise

CFR 205

inspector

Committ

required 

The crite

various ty

food proc

also be c

The NOP

(www.io

inspector

developm

Riddle J.

The NOP

 2011 

RANDUM F

ARDS BOA

Miles 

Deput

Nation

CT: Quali

P regulations

e in organic p

5.501(a)(5)). 

rs, the NOP r

tee (CACC) 

to meet prio

eria should d

ypes of insp

cessing and 

onsidered. 

P suggests th

ia.org) for th

rs. The NOP

ment of their

 and J. Ford

P appreciates

FOR THE C

ARD (NOSB

McEvoy 

ty Administr

nal Organic 

ifications of

s require that

production a

 To help cla

requests that

develop a co

or to conduct

describe the b

ections, incl

other handli

hat the CACC

heir input on

P also recom

r proposal: IF

. 

s the assistan

CHAIRPER

B) 

rator

Program (N

f Inspectors

t certifiers en

and handling

arify what qu

t the NOSB 

ommittee pro

ting inspecti

baseline stan

luding crops

ing operation

C consult wi

n the subject,

mmends that t

FOAM/IOIA

nce of the CA

RSON OF T

NOP) 

nsure that em

g techniques 

ualifies as “s

Certification

oposal outlin

ons of organ

ndards for ed

, wild crops,

ns. Requirem

ith the Intern

, given their 

the CACC r

A Internation

ACC in wor

1400 In

Room 

Washin

THE NATIO

mployees an

to successfu

sufficient exp

n, Accredita

ning the crite

nic productio

ducation and

, dairy, other

ments for co

national Org

r long experi

refer to the fo

nal Organic I

rking on this

ndependenc

2646-South

ngton, DC 

ONAL ORG

nd contractor

ully perform 

pertise” for 

ation, and Co

eria that insp

on and handl

d experience 

r livestock, g

ontinuing edu

ganic Inspect

ience in train

following ref

Inspection M

s matter. 

ce Avenue, S

h, STOP 026

20250-0201

GANIC 

rs have suffi

their duties 

organic 

ompliance 

pectors shou

ling operatio

needed for 

grower grou

ucation shou

tors Associa

ning organic 

ference in 

Manual, 2000

S.W.

68

1

cient 

(7 

uld be 

ons. 

ups, 

uld 

ation 

0,
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 10, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1956 Lower Tribunal No. F13-13911

________________ 

### Raishawn Robinson , Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and James Odell and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sonia Perez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1072 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1072

To amend title 18, United States Code, to limit the authority of States 
 and localities to regulate conduct, or impose penalties or taxes, in 
                    relation to rifles or shotguns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2019

 Mr. Collins of New York (for himself, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. 
Zeldin, Mr. Duncan, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following bill; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to limit the authority of States 
 and localities to regulate conduct, or impose penalties or taxes, in 
                    relation to rifles or shotguns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Second Amendment Guarantee Act'' or 
the ``SAGA Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY OF STATES AND LOCALITIES TO REGULATE 
              CONDUCT IN RELATION TO RIFLES OR SHOTGUNS.

    Section 927 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``No'' and inserting ``(a) Except as 
        provided in subsection (b), no''; and
            (2) by adding after and below the end the following:
    ``(b)(1) A State or a political subdivision of a State may not 
impose any regulation, prohibition, or registration or licensing 
requirement with respect to the design, manufacture, importation, sale, 
transfer, possession, or marking of a rifle or shotgun that has moved 
in, or any such conduct that affects, interstate or foreign commerce, 
that is more restrictive, or impose any penalty, tax, fee, or charge 
with respect to such a rifle or shotgun or such conduct, in an amount 
greater, than is provided under Federal law. To the extent that a law 
of a State or political subdivision of a State, whether enacted before, 
on, or after the date of the enactment of this subsection, violates the 
preceding sentence, the law shall have no force or effect. For purposes 
of this subsection, the term `rifle or shotgun' includes any part of a 
rifle or shotgun, any detachable magazine or ammunition feeding device, 
and any type of pistol grip or stock design.
    ``(2) In an action brought for damages or relief from a violation 
of paragraph (1), the court shall award the prevailing plaintiff a 
reasonable attorney's fee in addition to any other damages or relief 
awarded.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of FAO, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the periodending August 2, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry R. Welch, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 3, 2003 |                                   | /s/  Jerry R. Welch |   |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|                   | Jerry  R. Welch                        |                |
|                   | Chief  Executive Officer and President |                |

 

----
| (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|            |   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                 |
|-----------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| August 11, 2009 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Craig A. Waltzer                         |
|            |   |   |   | Craig A. Waltzer                                                                                                                                                     |
|            |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director                                                                                                                      |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott Spangenberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Tut Systems Inc., on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tut Systems, Inc.



By:

/s/ Scott SpangenbergScott Spangenberg Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


Date: May 10, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1104 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1104

 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require labeling 
                    of genetically engineered fish.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2019

 Mr. Young (for himself, Mr. DeFazio, and Ms. Bonamici) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require labeling 
                    of genetically engineered fish.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT 
              REGARDING GENETICALLY ENGINEERED SALMON.

    Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
343) is further amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(z) If it contains genetically engineered fish unless the food 
bears a label stating that the food contains genetically engineered 
fish.''.
                                 <all>
```
Statement of the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe

- The Tribe does not accept or believe that is must comply with the 2014 Farm Bill and that Section 297B specifically allows us to submit a plan that meets those provisions.  In fact they Farm Bill does NOT say Hemp Production must cease until USDA regs are in place.  This is contrary to congressional intent.

Tribes may often be not only the primary regulator of the hemp industry in Indian Country, and the primary market participant.  They could also be the ONLY market participant.  This is much different that the state models.

The growth in 2020 would result in lost land lease revenues because of cancelled leases for the 2019 summer, and possibly 2020 summer.

Tribes are fantastic at regulating based on federal guidance, and not direct regulation.  For instance, see Indian Gaming, Natural Resource Development, and Taxation.

Over-regulation will be incredibly costly to the Tribe, and the lack of strong guidance from the USDA will not give lending entities comfort when lending for commercial loans.

State Pre-emption guidance will need to be issued to states, ESPECIALLY a state like South Dakota that is not legalized.  The states must understand that this activity it completely pre-empted, and that they may not interfere with the Tribe’s operation.

When new tobacco regulation was to be instituted, FDA allowed for existing operations to continue to operate under specific guidance.  This is exactly what should happen here so as to not jeopardize existing operations.

Ben Fenner