alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Innovative Livestock Services is grateful for the opportunity to provide written comments on the Cattle 

Contracts Library Pilot Program. While we understand the sentiment behind this program we are highly 

skeptical of reporting that could reveal trade secrets and therefore we encourage the AMS to not only 

follow but exceed the required confidentiality standards in this pilot program.

Specifically, we wish for components of the contract to not be identifiably linked to each other in a way 

that allows entire contracts to be reconstructed and that individual premium and discount schedules not 

be revealed. We believe a complete list of the contract components available will allow the majority of 

potentially helpful information to be shared while minimizing confidentiality concerns. We also request 

that in this pilot program, information not be sorted by reporting region, so that identities of contract

parties remain confidential. 

We would like to point out that as this is a pilot program, it remains possible to share more information 

in a full program if authorized later, however it is impossible to reclaim the confidentiality of any 

information shared in this pilot. Therefore we urge AMS to err on the side of releasing less detailed 

information in this pilot, allowing the industry to process this information and have an informed 

discussion of the merits and costs of providing it in a more detailed form.
CERTIFIED PORK PROGRAMS 

Characteristic Montebello Premium Pork 

Live Requirements

Source verified X

Yield Factors

US No. 1 X

USDA Information

Initial release date Jun 2002 Revision date Jun 2002 USDA Certified X

Management Claims

Contact program for requirements X

X-Indicates program requirement March 2, 2005 USDA Certified Programs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PS COURT ASSOCIATES, LLC, T/A AND

GENERAL PARTNER OF PS COURT

ASSOCIATES, LP,

 Petitioner

 v.

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. AND

KING OF PRUSSIA ASSOCIATES,

 Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 926 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0051

SAT Date: 11/6/2012

Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 12

2

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

P2Rec Comments:

Comment: No Comment

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

IRR/POSS CORR-E,S,L,MM

LUNG

LIVER

UNCERT SENS-S,L

AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0050-51
FATE: Estimations for 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 5.24 (E) 

S = Dispersible / 1.20 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.40 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.75 (E)

log Fish BAF = 3.02 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through 

the GI tract, and good through the lung, based on analogs. There are concerns for severe 

irritation/possible corrosion to all exposed tissues, and for cationic binding to lung membranes, 

based on the of the PMN substance. There also is concern for liver 

toxicity and uncertain concern for dermal and respiratory sensitization, based on 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.37 amide SAR

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.068 aliphatic amine SAR

green algal 96-h EC50 0.025 amide SAR

fish _ chronic value 0.005 amide SAR

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.008 aliphatic amine SAR

algal _ chronic 

value

0.011 aliphatic amine SAR

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for aliphatic amines and amides; 

SAR chemical class = aliphatic amine, amide; ; liquid; log Kow = 5.45 (EPI); S = 

dispersible in water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1 both aliphatic amine and amide SARs

SARs aliphatic amines and amides

SAR Class aliphatic amine, amide

Ecotox Category Aliphatic Amines

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
**Exhibit      32.1**

 

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of                Registrant. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                November 12, 2008 |                                                                | /s/                Howard B. Katz |
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                    | Howard                B. KatzChief                Executive Officer |
|                                    |                                                                |                              |

----
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E.
      Eugene Sharer, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.


/s/
                    E. Eugene SharerE.
                        Eugene Sharer
                      Interim
                        Principal Financial Officer




December
      19, 2007
NO. 07-06-0252-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MARCH 27, 2007

______________________________

MIGUEL RUDOLFO GONZALES, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 51,777-E; HONORABLE ABE LOPEZ, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Following a plea of not guilty, Appellant Miguel Rudolfo Gonzales was convicted by

a jury of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to ninety-nine years

confinement. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have both been filed. Three

extensions of time have been granted in order for appointed counsel, Cynthia J. Barela,
2

to complete Appellant’s brief. After the third deadline of February 20, 2007, lapsed, this

Court notified counsel by letter dated February 27, 2007, of the defect and requested that

either the brief or a response to the notice be filed on or before March 9, 2007. Counsel

did not respond nor was the brief filed.

Therefore, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for

further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: 

1. Whether Appellant desires to prosecute this appeal.

2. Why Appellant’s counsel, Cynthia J. Barela, has failed to file a brief.

3. Whether Appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel.

4. Whether Appellant’s counsel, Cynthia J. Barela, should be removed.

5. Whether Appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.

Should the trial court determine that Appellant does want to continue the appeal,

that present counsel should be removed, and that Appellant is indigent and entitled to

court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent Appellant

in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and

state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing counsel. 

The trial court shall cause its finding and recommendations, together with any orders

it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental clerk's
3

record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter’s record of any

proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental reporter’s

record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before April 16, 2007.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association
Members/State Street Collective Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip J. Lussier, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



                                             /s/ Philip J. Lussier
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Philip J. Lussier
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             May 10, 2006
Order filed, April 14, 2015.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-15-00210-CV

FRANCISCO CALLEJA-AHEDO, Appellant

V.

COMPASS BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 2014-22168

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 7, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. 

The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has 

not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we 

issue the following order.

We order Gina Wilburn, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record 

in this appeal, if any, within 30 days of the date of this order.
/s/ Evelyn Keyes

 Acting individually
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #13054 and #13055]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-4061-DR), dated 03/22/2012.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Mudslides, and Landslides.                    

*Incident Period:*                         03/15/2012 through 03/31/2012.                    

*Effective Date:*                         03/31/2012.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/21/2012.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         12/24/2012.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of West Virginia, dated 03/22/2012 is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 03/15/2012 and continuing through 03/31/2012.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2012-9456 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
      Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
      certifies that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Michael
              M. SchurerMichael
              M. SchurerChief
                Financial Officer and Treasurer
              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
              November
                13, 2006
#### BECO EQUIPMENT CO., INC., a Colorado Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. O. Wesley BOX, a/k/a Wesley Box, Defendant-Appellee, Cooper Motors, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, d/b/a Michael Leasing, Inc., Defendant. MICHAEL LEASING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wesley BOX, Defendant-Appellee, Beco Equipment Co., Inc., Defendant.

No. 77-1105.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

Feb. 28, 1980.

Eric Pierson, Aurora, for Beco Equipment Co., Inc.

Fischer & Wilmarth, Elery Wilmarth, Stephen E. Howard, Fort Collins, for Michael Leasing, Inc.

Berenbaum & Berenbaum, Edwin G. Perlmutter, Denver, Yegge, Hall & Evans, Thomas R. Bromberg, Denver, for defendant-appellee.

RULAND, Judge.

We affirm the summary judgment of the district court determining that plaintiffs, Michael Leasing, Inc., and Beco Equipment *851Co., Inc., are not entitled to claim mechanic’s liens against the property of defendant O. Wesley Box.

Lessors of equipment such as Michael Leasing and Beco that provide equipment to a sub-contractor for a construction project must establish entitlement to a lien pursuant to § 38-22-101(1), C.R.S.1973. And, in order to establish that entitlement, the statute has been construed to require that the claimant know, *at the time the lienable work is first performed,*where the property is located which may be subjected to a lien. *Tabor-Pierce Lumber Co. v. International Trust Co.,*19 Colo.App. 108, 75 P. 150 (1904); *see also B. F. Saizer Lumber Co. v. Lindenmeier,*54 Colo. 491, 131 P. 442 (1913).

We find no support for Michael Leasing’s contention that the General Assembly intended to exclude lessors from this requirement in the 1965 amendments to the mechanic’s lien statute. *See*C.R.S.1963, 86-3-1 (1965 Perm.Supp.). Indeed, where, as here, a statute is reenacted without change in the language which has deceived prior judicial construction, “it must be considered that the particular statute is reenacted with the understanding that there be adherence by the judiciary to its former construction.” *Crownover v. Gleichman,*194 Colo. 48, 574 P.2d 497 (1977). *See also Meurer, Serafini & Meurer, Inc. v. Skiland Corp.,*38 Colo.App. 61, 551 P.2d 1089 (1976).

We have considered Michael Leasing’s other contentions and conclude that, based upon the record before us, these contentions lack merit.

Judgment affirmed.

STERNBERG and KIRSHBAUM, JJ., concur.
June 28, 2011

MEMORANDUM

TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0542

SUBJECT: Supplemental Information for Renewable Gasoline and Renewable Gasoline 

Blendstock Pathways Under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) Program 

This memorandum summarizes the lifecycle GHG results from modeling the renewable gasoline and 

renewable gasoline blendstock pathways.
Summary of Lifecycle Results

Figure 1 illustrates the lifecycle GHG emissions results from the renewable gasoline and renewable 

gasoline blendstock modeling. It shows the percent difference between lifecycle GHG emissions in 2022 

for the pathways as compared to the 2005 petroleum gasoline fuel baseline. Results from the RFS2 final 

rule for the cellulosic F-T diesel pathway are also shown for added context. 

Figure 1: Lifecycle GHG Emissions Results from RFS2 Final Rule and 

Renewable Gasoline and Renewable Gasoline Blendstock Pathways Using Corn Stover 

(g CO2-eq./mmBtu)

* Approximated based on biochemical cellulosic ethanol process from RFS2 final rule

Table 1 below breaks down by stage the lifecycle GHG emissions for the cellulosic pathways and the 

2005 petroleum baseline. The table demonstrates the contribution of each stage in the fuel pathway 

and its relative significance in terms of GHG emissions. 

-60000

-40000

-20000

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

2005 Gasoline BaselineDirect Fermentation to Renewable 

Gasoline/Gasoline Blendstock

RFS2 Final Rule F-T Diesel (includes 

naphtha, a gasoline blendstock)

Catalytic Pyrolysis to Renewable 

Gasoline Blendstock

Biochemical Fermentation to 

Renewable Gasoline via Carboxylic 

Acid

Fuel Combustion (Tailpipe)

Fuel & Feedstock Transport

Fuel Production

International Land Use Change

International Farm Inputs and Fert 

N2O

International Livestock

International Rice Methane

Domestic Soil Carbon

Domestic Rice Methane

-67% -65%

-129%* -91%
Table 1: Lifecycle GHG Emissions for RFS2 Cellulosic Pathways and Cellulosic Gasoline Pathways Using Corn Stover, 2022 (kg CO2-eq./mmBtu)

Fuel Type

2005 Gasoline 

Baseline

Direct 

Biochemical 

Fermentation 

to Renewable 

Gasoline and 

Renewable 

Gasoline 

Blendstock**

RFS2 Final Rule

Cellulosic F-T 

Diesel

Catalytic 

Pyrolysis to 

Renewable 

Gasoline 

Blendstock

Biochemical 

Fermentation to 

Renewable 

Gasoline via 

Carboxylic Acid

Net Domestic 

Agriculture (w/o 

land use change) ~11 11 9 8

Domestic Land 

Use Change ~-11 -11 -9 -8

Fuel Production 19 < or = -33 5 28 30

Fuel and 

Feedstock 

Transport * ~2 3 2 2

Tailpipe 

Emissions 79 ~1 1 2 2

Total Emissions 98 < or = -29 9 32 34

*Emissions included in fuel production stage.

** Approximated based on biochemical cellulosic ethanol process from RFS2 final rule.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Zeno,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the  period  ended June 30,  2005 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  August 11, 2005


/s/ Linda Smith
------------------------------
Linda Smith
C.F.O., Treasurer and
principal accounting officer
#### Kenneth E. Hoogs, Appellant, v Donald A. Robinson, Respondent.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Stone, J. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. —Misrepresentation.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 August 7, 2009
    /s/ John R. Eckel, Jr.John R. Eckel, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer