alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9914]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Healthcare Delivery Methodologies Member Applications.
    Date: May 7, 2012.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jacinta Bronte-Tinkew, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3164, MSC 7770, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 806-0009, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#46243429283223322f282d23312c2b0625353468282f2e68212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e2c3c21203a2b3a2720252b3924230e2d3d3c6020272660292138">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: Drugs, Alcohol and Learning.
    Date: May 16-17, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Michael Selmanoff, PhD., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3134, MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1119, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dab7a9bfb6b7bbb4b5bcbc9ab9a9a8f4b4b3b2f4bdb5ac"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="315c42545d5c505f5e5757715242431f5f58591f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 16, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-9914 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

R. ALLAN PAYNE,

A ppellant /Petitioner

,

vs.

FERRY LANE MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability

company,

Appellee/Respondent

. Case No.: DA 24

- 0429

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

The parties having filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal pursuant to Rule

16(5), Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure, and good cause appearing therefor;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Motion is GRANTED. This appeal is

dismissed with prejudice and each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees and

costs.

ELECTRONICALLY DATED AND SIGNED BELOW

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 1 2024

10/01/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0429
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3056520-OCT-201009:44 AM
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert E. Schulze, President of Bridgford Foods Corporation (the Company),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year
ended November 1, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                                        

Dated: January 24, 2003



| |  |     |  |                                                           
| |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ |  | Robert E. Schulze                                         
| |  |     |  | Robert E. Schulze, President
(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 4 (Monday, January 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 7577-012]


Burton Creek Hydro Inc., Sollos Energy, LLC'

    Notice of Transfer of Exemption
    1. By letter filed December 19, 2012, Burton Creek Hydro Inc. 
informed the Commission that its exemption from licensing for the 
Burton Creek Hydro Project, FERC No. 7577, originally issued September 
25, 1985,\1\ has been transferred to Sollos Energy, LLC. The project is 
located on Burton Creek in Lewis County, Washington. The transfer of an 
exemption does not require Commission approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 32 FERC ] 62,641, Order Granting Exemption From Licensing of 
a Small Hydroelectric Project of 5 Megawatts or Less.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Sollos Energy, LLC, Mr. Samuel Perry located at 5980 SE 30th 
Street, Mercer Island, Washington 98040 is now the exemptee of the 
Burton Creek Hydro Project, FERC No. 7577.

    Dated: December 26, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-00019 Filed 1-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           1,218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,519
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (43)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,173
<PP&E>                                           8,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,278)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,351
<BONDS>                                          4,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        120
<COMMON>                                           672
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,509
<SALES>                                         22,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,189
<CGS>                                           13,169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,485
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,119
<INCOME-TAX>                                       786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,333
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (811)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       522
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10.5(b)


                                NOMOS CORPORATION


                             1999 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                             ----------------------


         This Amendment No. 1 (this "Amendment") is made to the NOMOS
Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan").


                                    PREAMBLE

         The Board of Directors of the Company desires to amend the Plan to
increase the number of shares available for options under the Plan from
1,500,000 to 7,000,000. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have
the meanings ascribed thereto in the Plan.


                                   AMENDMENTS

         1. The first sentence of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended to
read as follows:

         "Seven Million (7,000,000) of the authorized but unissued shares of the
         Common Stock are hereby reserved for issue upon the exercise of Options
         which may be granted under the Plan; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the number
         of shares so reserved may from time to time be reduced to the extent
         that a corresponding number of issued and outstanding shares of the
         Common Stock are purchased by the Company and set aside for issue upon
         the exercise of Options which may be granted under the Plan."


         2. This Amendment shall be effective as of the date of its adoption by
the Company's Board of Directors and upon approval of the Company's
shareholders.




Adopted by the Board of Directors:  February 14, 2001

Approved by Shareholders:  March 2, 2001



                           ***************************
1517 WEST FRONT STREET SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702 TEL: 903-593-8471 FAX: 903-593-2193

Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van 

Zandt and Wood Counties

www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us

CHIEF JUSTICE

JAMES T. WORTHEN

JUSTICES

BRIAN HOYLE

GREG NEELEY

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

CLERK

CATHY S. LUSK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

MARGARET HUSSEY

April 7, 2015

Ms. Lois Rogers

District Clerk, Smith County

Courthouse, Suite 204

100 North Broadway Avenue

Tyler, TX 75702-7201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 12-14-00203-CV

Trial Court Case Number: 12-1808-D

Style: Linda C. Tate Reddic

v.

Larry D Reddic Sr.

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the 

Mandate issued in the above cause. When the District or County Clerk has executed the 

Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the 

information below and to return the attached copy to this office.

Very truly yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

C

C

:

Ms. Tina High Brumbelow (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Ms. Linda C. Tate Reddic

Mandate executed on __8TH_ day of ___APRIL_______________, 2015.

Brief explanation of action taken: ___SCANNED _______________________________________

___________LINDA RHYMES_______________________________District/County Clerk

FILE COPY

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/8/2015 2:21:05 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Regarding my case #02-15-00041-cv, I have been uable to find an attorney to file 

a motion to re-hear in this short notice. Since I did pay the $195, but just through 

the wrong place, would you please give me more time to have an attorney file 

this motion with the court? Thank you. Gail Sanders
ACCEPTED

02-15-000041-cv

SECOND COURT OF APPEALS

FORT WORTH, TEXAS

4/14/2015 11:57:29 AM

DEBRA SPISAK

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 2nd COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 04/14/2015 11:57:29 AM DEBRA SPISAK Clerk
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 22, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00900

- CV
TIM SCHOENBAUER , Appellant

V. DEUTSCHE BANK , Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 04889


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Schenck, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Schenck On July 22, 2019, the trial court signed an order granting appell ee’s application for an expedited order under rule of civil procedure 736 to proceed with a foreclosure sale of appellant’s property

. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 736. Appellant appeals from this order. Su ch an order is not subject to appeal. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P

. 736.8(c) ; Grant

- Brooks v. FV

- 1, Inc. , 176 S.W.3d
933 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2005, pet. denied). Because it appeared this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, we instructed appellant to file a letter brief addressing our concern with an opportunity for appellee to respond. The parties complied. Nothing in appellant’s letter brief demonstrates this Court’s jurisdiction over this appeal.– 2

–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a).

190900F.P05 /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TIM SCHOENBAUER, Appellant

No. 05

- 19

- 00900

- CV V. DEUTSCHE BANK, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 04889. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. Justices Myers and Carlyle participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee DEUTSCHE BANK recover its costs of this appeal from appellant TIM SCHOENBAUER.

Judgment entered this 22 nd day of November, 2019.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000013156
<NAME> BOOK CORPORATION OF AMERICA

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,307
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,053,459
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,069,766)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,714)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,714)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,714)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 11, 2010

0608 

# Order

June 11, 2010

140514-5

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140514-5 COA: 276423; 276904 Wayne CC: 06-008941-01 ARTHUR RONALD HAILEY, III, 06-008939-01 Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the December 17, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whethe r trial counsel was ineffective for any of the reasons asserted by the defendant.

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are inv ited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups

interested in the determinati on of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00270-CR

RUSSELL LITTLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19F0597-102

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the reporter’s record indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as that 

phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who 

was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). Volumes one 

and sixteen through nineteen of the reporter’s record contain the names of persons who were

minors at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders 

otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, 

must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in 

paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because 

volumes one and sixteen through nineteen of the reporter’s record contain sensitive data, we

order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the 

electronically filed volumes one and sixteen through nineteen of the reporter’s record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: December 22, 2020
[No. 37747.

Department Two.

July 29, 1965.]

#### Robert Eckman, *Respondent,*v. Board of King County Civil Service Commissioners *et al., Appellants.****

*Charles O. Carroll*and *James E. Kennedy,*for appellants.

*Burns & Schneiderman*and *James D. Bums,*for respondent.

*

Reported in 404 P.2d 785.

Per Curiam.

By mandate of the superior court, appellant civil service commission was required to classify respondent under RCW 41.14-.090. The classification was radio shop supervisor. The trial judge made findings of fact as follows:

> Finding of fact No. 5:

> That there was a lack of good faith on the part of the Sheriff’s Civil Service Commission when it held a hearing February 27, 1964 to determine the status of relator. The Commissions’ actions on that day and their prior actions indicate a lack of good faith in their evaluation of this case and further showed that the said Commission had prejudged the matter and did not give relator a fair hearing.

> And, in finding of fact No. *8:*

> That six months prior to December 4, 1958 when RCW 41.14.090 took effect, relator was a Captain in the King County Sheriff’s Office and was performing Captain’s duties.

Appellant states in his brief “. . . The ultimate issue is the factual question of what duties respondent Eckman performed in the King County Sheriff’s Department continuously from June 4, 1958 to December 4, 1958. . . .”

The record contains ample proof to substantiate the court’s findings set out above. *Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.,*54 Wn.2d 570, 343 P.2d 183 (1959).

The judgment is affirmed.
lANCE 

### R. LEFLEUR ROBERT

### J. BENTLEY DIRECTOR GovERNOR Alabama Department of Environmental Management adem.alabama.gov 1400 Coliseum Blvd. 36110·2400 • Post Office Box 301463 Montgomery, Alabama 36130·1463 (334) 271-7700 • FAX (334) 271-7950
March 2, 2012 Mr. Franklin Hill Director, Superfund Division US Environmental Protection Agency 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

### RE: EPALetterProposingPath Forward for Site Completion for AlabamaPlating Alabama Plating, ShelbyCounty, Alabama EPA 

### J.D. No. ALD 004 022 448 Dear Mr. Hill: The Alabama Department ofEnvironmental Management (ADEM or the Department) received your letter on February 23, 2012 proposing a remedial action and path forward for Site completion, to include tlnalizingthe site on the National Priorities List (NPL), for the Alabama PlatingCompany Superfund Site. To address the elevated metals concentrations in the groundwater, EPA is recommending in-situ chemical injections accompanied with monitored natural attenuation. EPA estimates the cost for the selected remedy to be approximately $835,000, with the Statecostshareof$83,500 which would be expected in year20 15 or2016. As stated in ourprevious letters regardingthe listing ofthis siteon the NPL, the Department is committed to a 5-yearpayment schedule for the State share ofcleanup costs associated with the American Brass NPL Site (EPA J.D. No. ALD 981 868 466). This commitment for Alabama Hazardous Substance Cleanup Fund (AHSCF) funds will be completed in 2014. Therefore, the Department would be willing to accept EPA's proposed remedial action and commit to the State cost share of$83,500 since payment obligations would not begin until ADEM's obligation to American Brass is fulfilled. Please note that your letter states that all ofthe steps precedingthe remedial action would be perfonned on a federal fund-lead basis and "would place no additional financial burden on the State ofAlabama". Based on this statement, it is the Department's understandingthat ADEM will not be asked to provide any additional funds beyond those requested in the subject Jetter. Therefore, ADEM would be willing to commit to the agreed upon total Statecost share of$83,500, but cannotcommit to any amountgreater than $100,000.

Birmingham Branch Decatur Branch Mobile Branch Mobile-Coastal 

# . . 110Vulcan Roi3:d 2715Sandtin Road, S. W. 2204 Perimeter Road 4171 Commanders Drive 

### • . 

### • Birmingham,AL 352094702 Decatur, AL 35603-1333 Mobile, AL 36615-1131 Mobite, Al36615-1421 (205)942-6168 (256)353-1713 (251) 450-3400 (251) 432-6533 (205)941-1603 (FAX) (256) 340.9359(FAX) (251) 479-2593{FAX) (251)432-6598(FAX}Mr. Franklin Hill March 2, 2012 

### Page 2 of2

Ifyou have any questions orconcerns regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Stephen A. Cobb at 334­ 271-7739 or via email at sac@adem.state.al.us. Sincerely,

Wrn. Gerald Hardy, Chief Land Division

cc: Mrs. Gwendolyn Keyes Flerning/USEPA Region 4 Mrs. Tracy P. Strickland/ADEM Mrs. Brandi Little/ ADEM