alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 21.1**

**List of Subsidiaries of Apollo Asset Backed Credit Company LLC as of March 28, 2024**

 

Name of Subsidiary
  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization

ABC Holdings 1, L.P.
  Delaware
ABC Holdings 2, L.P.
  Delaware
ABC Holdings 3 (B), L.P.
  Delaware
ABC Holdings 4 (B), L.P.
  Delaware
ABC Intermediate Holdings 1 (DC), LLC
  Delaware
ABC Intermediate Holdings 2 (DC)(B), LLC
  Delaware
ABC Intermediate Holdings 3 (B), LLC
  Cayman
ABC REIT Holdings, LLC
  Delaware
ABC REIT Intermediate Holdings, LLC
  Delaware
ABC REIT TRS (B), LLC
  Delaware**
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of White Electronic Designs
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Hamid Shokrgozar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Date: December 16, 2004 /s/Hamid ShokrgozarHamid ShokrgozarChief Executive Officer
Fruit & Specialty Crops 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Vegetable Inspection Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Division Washington, DC 20250-0240

 May 29, 2013

AMENDMENT NO. 2

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION 

FROZEN VEGETABLES DATED FEBRUARY 2012

The purpose of this amendment is to revise the length of the cobs of the frozen corn on the cob 

specification, and to add the specification for frozen spinach to Section II. Individual 

Commodity Specifications and the Universal Product Codes for primary and secondary 

packaging to Section V, Exhibit 5. 

G. Frozen Corn-on-the-Cob

1. Grade: U.S. Grade A (or U.S. Fancy).

2. Length: Short (3 inches to 31⁄2inches).

3. Color: Golden (or yellow).

4. Style: Trimmed.

5. Unit Size: 1,320 cases.

6. Pack Size: 96 ears per case.

K. Frozen IQF Spinach

1. Grade: U.S. Grade A.

2. Style: Chopped.

3. Package size: 12/2 LB, and 20 LB.

Universal Product Code

 WBSCM

Frozen Vegetables Material Primary Container Secondary Container

SPINACH CHOPPED FRZ IQF-PKG-12/2 LB 110391 7 15001 10391 2 1 07 15001 10391 5

SPINACH CHOPPED FRZ IQF-CTN-20 LB 110392 7 15001 10392 5 1 07 15001 10392 8

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24712-24713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for a license as a 
Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier (NVO) and/or Ocean Freight 
Forwarder

[[Page 24713]]

(OFF)--Ocean Transportation Intermediary (OTI) pursuant to section 19 
of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46 
CFR part 515). Notice is also hereby given of the filing of 
applications to amend an existing OTI license or the Qualifying 
Individual (QI) for a license.
    Interested persons may contact the Office of Transportation 
Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, by 
telephone at (202) 523-5843 or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e9a6bda0a98f848ac78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dc9388959cbab1bff2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>.

Caicos Caribbean Lines, Inc. (NVO & OFF), 9999 NW 89th Avenue, Bay 
20, Medley, FL 33178, Officer: Joanne Tyson, President/Secretary/
Treasurer (Qualifying Individual), Application Type: Add OFF 
Service.
Chartwell Navigation Inc. (NVO), 20 Heather Lane, Belle Mead, NJ 
08502, Officers: Kenneth T. Carr, President/Treasurer/Secretary 
(Qualifying Individual), Application Type: New NVO License.
Choiceone Logistics, Inc. (NVO & OFF), 10025 NW 116th Way, 
<greek-i>17, Medley, FL 33178, Officers: Trina M. Gomez, Pres./VP/
Treas./Sec. (Qualifying Individual), Application Type: New NVO & OFF 
License.
Concord Express, Inc. (NVO), 1031 W. Manchester Blvd., <greek-i>C, 
Inglewood, CA 90301, Officers: Philip Chin, Secretary (Qualifying 
Individual), Application Type: QI Change.
Onsite Global Logistics LLC (OFF), 9816 Whithorn Drive, Suite B, 
Houston, TX 77095, Officer: Herbert R. Hogg, Operating Manager 
(Qualifying Individual), Application Type: New OFF License.
Toyo Logistics America, Inc. (NVO), 20675 S. Western Avenue, 
<greek-i>208, Torrance, CA 90501, Officers: Kyoko V. Thomas, General 
Manager (Qualifying Individual), Koshi Hidaka, President, 
Application Type: QI Change.
USA Tomcargo, Corp. (NVO), 6907 NW 82nd Avenue, Miami, FL 33166, 
Officers: Hector A. Parra, President (Qualifying Individual), Lya A. 
Parra, Secretary, Application Type: New NVO License.
Yuexin Global Logistics (USA) Co., Ltd. (NVO & OFF), 805 W. Duarte 
Road, Suite 107, Arcadia, CA 91007, Officer: Allen Tran, President/
Secretary/Treasurer (Qualifying Individual), Application Type: New 
NVO & OFF License.

     Dated: April 20, 2012.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9989 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 24 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding 

Presidential election voting rights for residents of all United States 

territories and commonwealths. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Ms. PLASKETT submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States regarding Presidential election voting rights for 

residents of all United States territories and commonwealths. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 24 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The right of citizens of the United 

5 States to vote in the election for President and Vice Presi6 dent shall not be denied or abridged by the United States 

7 or by any State on account of residency in a territory or 

8 commonwealth of the United States. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to en10 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
- 1

- Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

s ascha.vanderbellen@ delta .com

October 12 , 2012

via email and regulations.gov

The Honorable Susan Kurland

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Congressional Support for Delta’s Seatt le

- Haneda service proposal

Dear Assistant Secretary Kurland :

Please find enclosed letters from members of the congressional delegations of Alaska, Idaho,

Montana, Oregon and Utah expressing support for Delta’s Seattle

- Haneda service proposal.

These letters are in addition to the letter of support signed by the ten

- member Washington state

delegation that was filed in the docket on August 8, 2012.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

CC: DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 0018

Service ListC ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing document has been ser ved this 1 2 th day of October , 2012 , upon

the following persons via email:

Francis.Heil@aa.com

Robert.Wirick@aa.com

dan.weiss@united.com

thoma s.bolling@united.com

lhalloway@crowell.com

gmurphy@crowell.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com

paul.gretch@dot.gov

keith.glatz@dot.gov

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov

brett.k ruger@dot.gov

todd.homan@dot.gov

urskr@state.gov

eugene_alford@ita.doc.gov

info@airlineinfo.com

Tim.OMalley@alpa.org

Ishiwata.K@portseattle.org

Safora.I@portseattle.org

Kyle.Levine@alaskaair.com

Megan.Lawrence@alaskaair.com
ex_384350.htm


Exhibit 4.11


 


 


 





 


 


July 28, 2021


Fahar Merchant


2 Bloor St. W, 7th Floor


Toronto, ON    M4W 3E2


 


Dear Fahar,


 


We are asking you to agree to certain changes to the written employment agreement dated January 1, 2013 as amended March 1, 2015, October 1, 2016, September 21, 2017 and November 3, 2020 (your "Employment Agreement") a copy of which is enclosed with this amendment letter).


 


We have set out the change that will be made to the terms of your Employment Agreement, below. Please sign and return this document to indicate your acceptance of this change. Once you have accepted the change, this document will constitute an official amendment to the terms of your Employment Agreement.


 


	 	
			1.

				
			Change to your Base Salary - Section 3.1(a) will be modified to reflect your new Base Salary of Cdn $405,000 which is effective as of April 1, 2021.

			
	 	 	 
	 	Finally, all other terms and conditions of your Employment Agreement shall remain the same.



 


Thank you for taking the time to carefully consider this letter. Please return a signed copy at your earliest convenience. In the meantime, if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.


 


Yours Sincerely,


Medicenna Therapeutics


 


Signed: /s/ Elizabeth Williams                            


 


I hereby agree to amend the terms and conditions of my Employment Agreement, as described above. All remaining terms and conditions of my employment will remain in effect, unchanged by this consent.


 


	
			Signed: /s/ Fahar Merchant                                 


			             Fahar Merchant

				
			Date:   July 27, 2021
#### Barbara Kent, Appellant, v Fearless Realty, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Danella Coleman, Respondent.

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Francis N. Pécora, J.), entered January 18, 1991, which granted defendant Coleman’s motion to vacate a default judgment of foreclosure to the extent of permitting said defendant to serve an answer within twenty days of service of the order with notice of entry, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of vacating the extension of leave to serve an answer and instead, granting the motion to the extent of directing a hearing on the issue of proper service of the summons and complaint, and otherwise affirmed, with costs.

In moving to vacate the default judgment of foreclosure in this action six months after that judgment was entered and after the property was noticed for sale, defendant Coleman asserted that at the time of the purported personal service of the summons and complaint she was in South Carolina and that by the time she returned and found a mailed copy of the *500documents, it was too late to answer. Supreme Court found these assertions to be insufficient to rebut the process server’s affidavit, but found Coleman had provided a valid reason for failing to serve a timely answer and had presented a potentially meritorious defense as well. Upon our reading of the record, defendant’s assertions were sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to the validity of service, but utterly failed to offer any other excuse for the default. In these circumstances, there should be a traverse hearing, which will result either in dismissal of the complaint or denial of the motion to vacate the default judgment. Even if a party has a potentially meritorious defense, a default judgment should not be vacated if that party has stood by idly, willfully and persistently, while the action proceeded to judgment and enforcement proceeds. *(See, Kahn v Stamp,*52 AD2d 748; 5 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶5015.04.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.
i% / - i O I FILED IN SS Dft rr! UGtOiJ IC d ,ST court of appeals

Ro zhnroJ 22 nnsr^_ ho***TM*

^ apr -8 Z015

Flpr'fl S , 2-OjsS cHBis^y

CLERK

f. hri'sfophgr R. Pr/;jg ; CJgric Fi'r34 Court o-f App£ftk_

20/ F&ukiI/J Sfrggt

RE: F\r+uro IDg/p Pled//Jft

Cr»us£ Wu-onbdr; oi-U-OOZSliC^

Ol-^b-OOlbO-Cft Ol-%-00 Zkl-Cft.

Dcflr DD.r. Pnu£_;

PRINE

tTlu ptjrpa3£ fu cxjrrtikjo i$ to rgcpgsi- •ffnW Ly/OLJ

iajcai&nd to "T Q. C, o, thei OpLA/10/\7 re KJ d £r Lrd / Kj_ CRUSe A/OS, ^.Hlr7J2J^|/^Hllll.3/_cI.^T5yjL. XAJ_3aiLd

OOxAJioAL -fhi-s C-OLT+ r£-forn~>ed the Tr/fYlJ^Qpri.3-

judcjno<rM-fr TO d^leig th£ R-f-fn-mRTiVs •fj'udi'K/^ Q B_de_Rd1u_jLug_aftQjy.t J tried -to get P> copu o-fth£_ judqmeuf-Fronp th£ d^stnct oierk hu-f -the triftl court

fjj-forrngd ni£ -flint tlngu d/d/o't hftV£ A copq o-P thio,

.0 pi iJ iOM, Sc£ ft ft6 chad.

hftvs. p> cop^ o-f this opi/j<sOM buf TcO. C. cJ. oj>< M0+ hO/JOr_B^COp<-j com", Ma -From n^j [jjmA-f£ . I-f

has -ro r.nniH -From the courts.

SikiCE thnf d^Lj _LV£ b££/J fruiklcj fLO_^Lii X D.C-lJ.

_i— .y-v *-1 — I ,~ i, ,—" .-4- I—* *~ »— 1 — .« .- I , i .— r/N /"V V» . S _L • I ^-1 i i r „ d— —,—* ,r\^\ .y-.*—. , i

±Q deleft fha dendJu mi-Apou -fludikin trom mu

records. "fhr. o/olu_LQ£u_fo_deiejfe J"J" IA "For uou T(l kioti-Pu thirrr> -fhnt th& n-f-Prrmnti\/t5 -fiKicllucj (jjns

indeed delef^d.
CHRIS DANIEL &

14ARRlS£0UN

February 10,2014

Arturo Medina

#743972

59 Darrington Rd

Rosharon, Texas 77583

Re: YourRequestReceived: 01/21/2014

Reference Name: Arturo Medina

Cause Number: 9427213,9427214, & 9427947

CIERK

Dear Arturo Medina,

Certified copies of the Criminal document(s) in the above referenced cause number(s) are

enclosed.

£3 Other: Judgement/Sentence, Second Request for Hearing,Respbnse to 2nd request for hearing,

Motion for NUNC PRO TUNC & Mandate, Docket sheet. There was not a reformed judgment

in your file. You may have to contact First Court of Appeals about getting a reformed

judgement. @ 301 Fannin, Houston, Texas 77002-2066.

Enclosure

Sincerely,

Chris Daniel, District Clerk

Harris County, Texas

vy-M A &Ja Mary S/pJmtoja, Deputy gjjstrict Clerk

201 CAROLINE • P.O. BOX 4651«HOUSTON, TEXAS •77210-4651 • (713)755-7300

www.hcdistrictclerk.com
-J

•j

o

o

W

M

O

s

IS

4- Tl

C 2?

4 (X?

si

to

o

2 j.

•+ $

o

c

"\

D

Pi

° T-,

^ pi

TOtn O \

? T ^ i

-.u-- /-. rs

K

-4

B

ls

"ft

31

\i
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank,N.A. 

 
By: /s/ Corey HenryName: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 31, 2023**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

# AGENCY:

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

# ACTION:

Second extension of hearing record closure date.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 15, 2012, (77 FR 48970), as amended, September 7, 2012, (77 FR 55196). The publication concerned notice of a hearing and meeting on October 2, 2012, regarding safety-related aspects of the design and factors that could affect the timely execution of the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) project at the Y-12 National Security Complex. The Board stated in the August 15, 2012, hearing notice that the hearing record would remain open until November 2, 2012, for the receipt of additional materials. The Board subsequently extended the hearing record closure date to January 2, 2013 (77 FR 65871).                    

*Extension of Time:*                         The Board now extends the period of time for which the hearing record will remain open to January 16, 2013, to further accommodate submission of answers to questions taken for the record during the course of the public hearing.                    

*Contact Person for Further Information:*                         Debra H. Richardson, Deputy General Manager, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-free number.                    

Dated: January 2, 2013.

Peter S. Winokur,

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 2013-00096 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
#### Brian W. MITCHELL, Registered Pharmacist, # 9772, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gail H. KLAPPER, Executive Director, Department of Regulatory Agencies, D. L. Simmons, Executive Secretary, Colorado State Board of Pharmacy, Lance R. Carmean, Pharmaceutical Inspector, Colorado State Board of Pharmacy, George M. Anderson, President, Colorado State Board of Pharmacy, Colorado State Board of Pharmacy, Thomas P. Deutsch, Vice President, Colorado State Board of Pharmacy, K. Morrison Brown, Lucille J. Crumbaker, Pamela S. Ford, Thomas E. Hitt, and Harold S. Kleiner, members, Colorado State Board of Pharmacy, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 80CA0720.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Dec. 31, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1981.

Certiorari Denied April 20, 1981.

Cecil A. Hartman, Englewood, for plaintiff-appellant.

J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., Joyce K. Herr, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for defendants-appel-lees.

PIERCE, Judge.

Appellant, a pharmacist, was charged for several violations of professional misconduct under § 12-22-124, C.R.S. 1973. The hearing officer for the State Board of Pharmacy determined that appellant had committed the violations and ordered that appellant’s license to practice pharmacy be suspended for a period of 30 days, but that the 30-day suspension be waived pending further investigation.

Two weeks later the Board issued its final agency decision which ordered the 30-day suspension without the waiver provision. The changes made by the Board were rendered without notice to appellant or without any further hearings following the hearing officer’s initial decision and order. Review was sought in the district court which upheld the action by the Board. We affirm.

Appellant asserts that the procedure specified in the Administrative Procedure Act, §§ 24-4-105(14) and 24-4-105(15)(a), C.R.S. 1973 (1979 Cum.Supp.), was not followed as to the change made by the Board in the hearing officer’s decision. However, these sections are applicable only when the *1164Board is a party to an action. At the point where the revision was made by the Board, it was still acting in its quasi-judicial capacity and was acting within its authority to modify the decision of the hearing officer under § 12-22-114, C.R.S. 1973. Thus, neither the statute nor due process principles require that the Board issue any notice prior to announcing its final decision.

The Board, under the statute, had the power to modify the recommendation of the hearing officer. *See Dixon v. State Board of Optometric Examiners,*39 Colo.App. 200, 565 P.2d 960 (1977). And, contrary to appellant’s suggestion, the changes in the statute since *Dixon*was decided, do not change our interpretation of the comparable statutory scheme.

Appellant also contends that the Board’s decision was arbitrary and capricious. Our review of the record shows nothing that would indicate that this appellant did not commit the violations alleged or that the sanctions placed upon him by the Board were not reasonable under the circumstances.

Judgment affirmed.

COYTE and RULAND, JJ., concur.