alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered September 24, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00474
- CV
ISRAEL A. GONZALEZ , Appellant

V. TIMOTHY C. ABIGAIL, ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal fro m the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 20
- 08247

O RDER Before the Court is the September 23, 2021 request of Gina Udall, Official Court Reporter for the 160th Judicial District Court, for a forty

- five day extensi on of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request to the extent that we extend the time to October 25, 2021

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35. 3(c). We caution Ms. Udall that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHI EF JUSTICE
OMB NO. 0581-0093

LP-16 (Expiration Date 11/30/2024) 

NOMINEE’S AGREEMENT TO SERVE

If appointed, I agree to serve on the Sorghum Promotion, Research, and 

Information Board (Board), and to disclose to the Secretary of Agriculture any 

relationship with any sorghum promotion entity or any organization that has a 

contractual relationship with the Board. 

_____________________________ _______________________ 

Signature Date

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a 

collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 

0581-0093. There is no time estimated to complete this information collection because it requires only a signature.

In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its 

Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based 

on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, 

family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights 

activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing 

deadlines vary by program or incident. 

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, 

American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or 

contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages 

other than English. 

To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at 

http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all 

of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter 

to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights; 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.;

Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, 

employer, and lender.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE II

FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

CHAPTER 3

PROHIBITION OF QUANTITATIVE RESTRICTIONS BETWEEN MEMBER STATES

Article 37

(ex Article 31 TEC)

(ex Article 31 TEC)

1.   Member States shall adjust any State monopolies of a commercial character so as to ensure that no discrimination regarding the conditions under which goods are procured and marketed exists between nationals of Member States.

The provisions of this Article shall apply to any body through which a Member State, in law or in fact, either directly or indirectly supervises, determines or appreciably influences imports or exports between Member States. These provisions shall likewise apply to monopolies delegated by the State to others.

2.   Member States shall refrain from introducing any new measure which is contrary to the principles laid down in paragraph 1 or which restricts the scope of the articles dealing with the prohibition of customs duties and quantitative restrictions between Member States.

3.   If a State monopoly of a commercial character has rules which are designed to make it easier to dispose of agricultural products or obtain for them the best return, steps should be taken in applying the rules contained in this Article to ensure equivalent safeguards for the employment and standard of living of the producers concerned.

---
#### Robert B. Essex, Respondent, v James Anderer, Appellant.

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages pursuant to Executive Law § 135 for misconduct by a notary public, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated December 6, 1989, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Upon review of the record, we find that the court properly denied the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment. A triable issue of fact exists as to whether he notarized a deed containing forged signatures resulting in a fraudulent conveyance of certain property upon which the plaintiff was induced to lend money. Mangano, P. J., Kooper, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TUT SYSTEMS,
INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          16,977
<SECURITIES>                                    23,442
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (260)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,306
<PP&E>                                           4,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,403
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,845
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,570
<SALES>                                         15,887
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,165
<CGS>                                            9,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,574)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,575)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,575)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.75)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
      Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
      of
      Directors of the Company, certifies that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      David
      Lichtenstein


David
      Lichtenstein


Chairman,
      President, and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


November
      14, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9570]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLOR957000-L63100000-HD0000: HAG12-0168]


Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands are 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management 
Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon, 30 days from the date 
of this publication.

WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN

Oregon

T. 12 S., R. 2 E., accepted April 6, 2012
T. 27 S., R. 12 W., accepted April 12, 2012
T. 39 S., R. 3 E., accepted April 12, 2012
T. 28 S., R. 11 W., accepted April 12, 2012

ADDRESSES: A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Land Office at 
the Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/Washington State Office, 333 SW. 
1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon required payment. A person or 
party who wishes to protest against a survey must file a notice that 
they wish to protest (at the above address) with the Oregon/Washington 
State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Hensley, (503) 808-6124, Branch 
of Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land Management, 333 SW. 1st Avenue, 
Portland, Oregon 97204. Persons who use a telecommunications device for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business 
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a 
message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply 
during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Before including your address, phone number, 
email address, or other personal identifying information in your 
comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including your 
personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any 
time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal 
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we 
will be able to do so.

Timothy J. Moore,
Acting Chief, Cadastral Surveyor of Oregon/Washington.
[FR Doc. 2012-9570 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                       1,000

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                          JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                            JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                                             1,378
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        638
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                       10,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  14,146
<PP&E>                                                            18,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     7,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    26,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             23,163
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              2,257
<PREFERRED>                                                        5,280
<COMMON>                                                          22,722
<OTHER-SE>                                                        16,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      26,658
<SALES>                                                           29,985
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  29,985
<CGS>                                                             17,640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     40,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  (2,638)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   (8,247)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          39
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               (8,286)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      (8,286)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        (1.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (1.52)


</TABLE>
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 4- 27 95

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e
v. Gary Pen n ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe llan t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Weste rnDis tri ctof M is so ur i - Sp rin gf ie ld

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Decem

be r 1, 2 01 4 Fi le d: Decem

be r 12 , 20 14 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, BOW MAN, an d C OLLOTO N, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM. Gary Pen n ap pe al s aft er th e Dis tri ct Co urt rev ok ed hi s supe rv is ed rel eas e an d 1 se nt en ced hi m wit hi n th e Ch ap te r 7 ad vi so ry Uni te d St at es Sen te nc in g Gui de li ne s
Th e Hon or ab le Beth Ph il li ps , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn 1 Dis tri ctof M is so ur i.ran ge to 12 m on th s i n pr is on . Pen n’s co un se l h as m ov edto wit hd raw an d h as fil ed

a b rie f arg ui ng th atPen n’s s en te nc e is subs tant iv el y un reas on ab le

. Upo n care fu l rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at th e Dis tr i c t Co urt di d no t im po se an un reas on ab le rev oc at io n se nt en ce. See Uni te d St at es v. Gro wde n, 66 3 F.3 d 98 2, 98 4 (8 th Ci r . 20 11 ) (p er curia m) (d es cri bi ng ap pe ll at e rev ie w of rev oc at io n se nt en ces ); Uni te d St at es v. Pet rei ki s, 55 1 F.3 d 82 2, 82 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (ap pl y in g a pr es um pt io n of subs ta nt iv e reas on ab le ne ss to a rev oc at io n se nt en ce wit hi n th e Gui de li ne s ran ge ).
Ac c o r d i n gl y , we affi rm th e jud gm en t of th e Dis tri ct Co urt. W e al so gr an t co un se l’s m ot io n fo r le av e to wit hd raw.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE I

THE INTERNAL MARKET

THE INTERNAL MARKET

Article 26

(ex Article 14 TEC)

(ex Article 14 TEC)

1.   The Union shall adopt measures with the aim of establishing or ensuring the functioning of the internal market, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Treaties.

2.   The internal market shall comprise an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is ensured in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties.

3.   The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall determine the guidelines and conditions necessary to ensure balanced progress in all the sectors concerned.

---
#### WYOMING BANCORPORATION, Appellant, v. Dwight BONHAM, Wyoming State Bank Examiner, and Wyoming Security Bank, Sheridan, Wyoming, a Wyoming Corporation, and its organizers and proposed officers and directors in their official capacity, Appellees.

No. 4589.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

June 14, 1977.

ORDER

GUTHRIE, Chief Justice.

Appellant and Appellees herein having filed their petitions for rehearing in the above matter, 563 P.2d 1382, and it appearing to the court that said petitions do not present any new facts or propositions of law but in effect seek rearguments Upon points decided adversely to the movants; and it appearing that the same should therefore be denied under the authority of *Olds*v. *Hosford,*359 P.2d 406 (Wyo.1961), and *Braten v. Baker,*78 Wyo. 300, 301, 325 P.2d 880 (1958).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petitions for rehearing be and the same are hereby denied.
International Commodity Procurement Division Purchases 

FY2023 - Quarter 3 

Commodity Qty in MT PO Value Average Cost 

BEANS, BLACK BAG-50 KG 270 $278,100.00 $1,030.00 

BEANS, GREAT NORTHERN BAG-50 KG 20 $28,500.00 $1,425.00 

BEANS, PINTO BAG-50 KG 310 $309,344.30 $997.88 

BULGUR BAG-50 KG 200 $178,972.00 $894.86 

CORN, YELLOW BAG-50 KG 340 $141,083.00 $414.95 

CORNMEAL BAG-HP-25 KG 8,390 $6,714,290.30 $800.27 

CORN-SOY BLEND PLUS BAG-HP-25 KG 3,710 $3,270,740.90 $881.60 

LENTILS BAG-50 KG 50 $46,861.00 $937.22 

OIL, VEGETABLE BOTTLE, PLS-6/4 L 670-719 130 $239,252.37 $1,840.11 

OIL, VEGETABLE CAN-6/4 L 5,050 $10,579,807.93 $2,094.89 

PEAS, GREEN, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 80 $52,280.00 $653.50 

PEAS, GREEN, WHOLE BAG-50 KG 80 $48,719.20 $608.99 

PEAS, YELLOW, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 32,800 $19,795,083.40 $603.51 

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 3,970 $2,819,837.30 $710.29 

SORGHUM BAG-50 KG 1,000 $445,000.00 $445.00 

SOYBEAN MEAL BULK 72,500 $35,716,255.00 $492.64 

WHEAT, HARD RED WINTER BULK 63,400 $23,814,967.60 $375.63 

WHEAT, NORTHERN SPRING BULK 8,800 $3,094,080.00 $351.60 

WHEAT, SOFT RED WINTER BULK 4,400 $1,320,000.00 $300.00 

WHEAT, SOFT WHITE BULK 156,000 $43,257,949.00 $277.29 

Grand Total 361,500 $152,151,123.30 

Commodity Qty in EA PO Value Average Cost 

BAGS, WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE- 50 KG 688,000 $472,292.00 $0.69
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

April 3, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00191

- CV

Alexander Webster PIERCE III

,

Appellant

v.

Julia Tomlin PIERCE

, Ap pellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 10620 Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On March 2 8 , 201 9 , the Bexar County District Clerk filed a notification of late record indicating Appellant has not yet paid for the record but i s mailing the payment . The d istrict c lerk requested additional time to prepar e the clerk’s record until April 8 , 2019

. On April 1, 2019, the Bexar County District Clerk filed the record. The motion is GRANTED. The clerk’s record is deemed timely filed.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of April, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-23-00058-CV

IN RE SHAWNEE CREEK LAND OWNERS ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Shawnee Creek Landowners Association, Inc., et al. (collectively Relators), have filed a 

petition for a writ of mandamus, asking this Court to grant their petition and to direct the 

Honorable Jeff M. Addison,

1

presiding judge of the 102nd Judicial District Court of Red River 

County, to vacate its order denying Relators’ Rule 91a motion to dismiss and to enter an order 

dismissing Real Parties in Interest’s (collectively the Landowners) claims, in full or in part. We 

deny Relators’ requested mandamus relief.

I. Background

On February 22, 2023, the Landowners filed a lawsuit against Relators, asserting claims 

for (1) declaratory judgment, (2) breach of restrictive covenants, (3) violation of Section 12.002

of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, (4) violation of the Texas Debt Collection Act, 

(5) trespass, and (6) agency, conspiracy, and respondeat superior. In addition to their request for 

declaratory relief, the Landowners asked for actual, consequential, special, and exemplary 

damages and attorney fees. On April 26, 2023, Relators filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to 

Rule 91a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, arguing that the claims raised in the 

Landowners’ original petition were baseless in fact and in law. After a hearing,

2

the trial court 

denied Relators’ motion to dismiss.

1Both the Relators and the Real Parties in Interest incorrectly refer to the Respondent as the Honorable Jeff M. 

Anderson. The Honorable Jeff M. Addison is the current presiding judge of the 102nd Judicial District Court of Red 

River County and signed the order at issue in this case.

2Although the parties refer to the hearing on Relators’ motion to dismiss, and the trial court’s order denying the 

motion states that a hearing was held, a transcript of the hearing was not included in the mandamus record.
3

III. Relators’ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus

Relators filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, claiming that the trial court abused its 

discretion by failing to dismiss all the Landowners’ causes of action and asking this Court to 

order the trial court to vacate the order denying its motion to dismiss. Relators also requested 

that this Court enter an order dismissing the Landowners’ claims, in full or in part. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered Relators’ petition for a writ of 

mandamus, the Landowners’ response, Relators’ reply, the mandamus record, and the applicable 

law, is of the opinion that the mandamus petition should be denied. 

III. Conclusion

Accordingly, we deny Relators’ petition for a writ of mandamus.

Scott E. Stevens

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: August 24, 2023

Date Decided: August 25, 2023