alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

JOHN T. KING,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2014-7087

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 12-949, Judge Alan G. Lance Sr., 

Judge Lawrence B. Hagel, Judge Margaret C. Bartley.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

KARL A. KAZMIERCZAK, Kazmierczak & Kazmierczak, 

LLP, Oakland, NJ, argued for claimant-appellant.

DOMENIQUE GRACE KIRCHNER, Commercial Litigation 

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. 

Also represented by JOYCE R. BRANDA, ROBERT E.

KIRSCHMAN, JR., MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR.; DAVID J.

BARRANS, RACHAEL BRANT, Office of General Counsel, 
 

United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 8, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRUNO'S, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                           4,908
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    181,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               233,549
<PP&E>                                         466,997
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,911
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 791,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          234,365
<BONDS>                                        400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           253
<OTHER-SE>                                    (330,149)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   791,431
<SALES>                                      2,899,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,899,044
<CGS>                                        2,202,753
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,202,753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               636,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              83,794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (80,212)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (30,697)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (49,515)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,674
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (51,189)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.03)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CB Richard Ellis RealtyTrust (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”), I, Jack A. Cuneo, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1 The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

May 15, 2007 

 

34
Instructions For: KC-140 

WAREHOUSE OPERATORS REPORT OF SPACE AVAILABILITY 

Used by warehouse operators to report storage space available. 

Submit the original of the completed form in hard copy to Kansas City Commodity 

Office, Mail Stop 8748, PO Box 419205, Kansas City, MO 64141-6205 or facsimile to 

KCCO at 816-926-6595. The KC-140 should be submitted to KCCO no later than 

the 5th day of each month. For questions or assistance, contact the Kansas City 

Commodity Office, Commodity Management Division, Storage Contract Branch at 

816-926-1542. 

Features for transmitting the form electronically are available to those customers 

with access credentials only. If you would like to establish online access credentials 

with USDA, follow the instructions provided at the USDA eForms web site. 

Blocks 1-7 must be completed as follows: 

Fld Name / 

Item No. 

Instruction 

1 Date Enter the date. 

2a-d 

Commodity 

For each commodity (dry, cooler, freezer), enter the available space 

in number of car lots, number of trucks, and quantity in pounds. 

3a-f 

Remarks 

Enter each warehouse code, contact person, phone number, fax 

number, load/unload capacity, and any special instruction. 

4a 

Name of 

Warehouse 

(Company) 

Enter the warehouse name or company name. 

4b 

Location of 

warehouse 

Enter the physical address of the storing warehouse. 

5a Signature Have an authorized official sign the block. 

5b Title Enter the title of the authorized official. 

Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 21.1



BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION



SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                                      |  |                            
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                                    |  | State in which Incorporated
|Bridgford Marketing Company                           |  | California                 
|Bridgford Meat Company                                |  | California                 
|Bridgford Food Processing Corporation                 |  | California                 
|Bridgford Food Processing of Texas, L.P.**            |  | Texas                      
|A.S.I. Corporation                                    |  | California                 
|Bridgford Distributing Company of Delaware (inactive) |  | Delaware                   
|American Ham Processors, Inc.*                        |  | Delaware                   
|Bert Packing Company (inactive)                       |  | Illinois                   
|Moriarty Meat Company (inactive)                      |  | Illinois                   

---

|* | - No shares have been issued.
|- | -----------------------------

|** | - Limited Partnership.
|-- | ----------------------
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack A. Cuneo, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ JACK A. CUNEOJack A. CuneoPresident and Chief Executive Officer


November 14, 2008
#### Paul R. Johnson et al., Appellants, v Ronald D. Morganti, Respondent.

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs appeal from an order which denied their motion for partial summary judgment enjoining defendant from soliciting the customers of Waterfalls Machine Co. It is settled law that one who sells a business, including its good will, to another has a legal duty to refrain from soliciting the customers of that business *(Hyde Park Prods. Corp. v Lerner Corp.,*65 NY2d 316, 321; *Mohawk Maintenance Co. v Kessler,*52 NY2d 276, 284-286). Whether the transfer of one’s stock interest in a business includes good will depends upon the circumstances surrounding the sale, particularly the size of the purchase price and the existence of express covenants barring competition by the seller *(Mohawk Maintenance Co. v Kessler, supra,*at 286). In this case, the purchase price was *988modest, about 10% of the tangible assets of the business, and no evidence was submitted that, at the time of the sale, defendant expressly agreed not to compete. Further, the individual plaintiff, who owned the remaining shares of stock in the business, testified at an examination before trial that he and defendant could not get along and that he bought defendant’s stock interest to eliminate the conflicts. Under the circumstances, Supreme Court properly determined that a factual issue existed whether defendant’s transfer of his stock interest in Waterfalls included a transfer of good will. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Seneca County, Falvey, J.— Partial Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.33


                      EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 3

         EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT made as of January 7, 2002 by and
between VFINANCE, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Timothy
Mahoney ("Employee").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, Employee and the Company desire to amend the Employment
Agreement dated January 5, 2001, as amended (the "Employment Agreement").

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Company and Employee hereby agree as follows:

         1. Paragraph 4 (a) to the Employment Agreement shall be amended as
follows:

         4 (a) BASE SALARY. The Company shall pay to Employee an initial base
salary of $208,000 per annum for the first year of this Agreement and shall
increase 5% percent (5%) per annum beginning one year from the date of this
Agreement and each year thereafter ("Base Salary"). The Base Salary and
Employee's other compensation will be reviewed by the Board at least annually
and may be increased (but not decreased) from time to time as the Board may
determine.

         2. Paragraph 4 (c) to the Employment Agreement shall be amended as
follows:

                  (c) OTHER PROVISIONS. Employee shall be entitled to four (4)
weeks paid vacation per annum and shall receive an automobile allowance of
$1,500 per month and shall increase five percent (5%) per annum beginning one
year from the date of this Agreement and each year thereafter. Employee shall be
reimbursed for all reasonable expenses incurred by him in the performance of his
duties, including, but not limited to, cellular telephone, entertainment, travel
and other expenses deemed reasonably necessary by the Board of Directors.

         3. All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date
first hereinabove written.

EMPLOYER:

vFINANCE, INC.

[Leonard J. Sokolow]

By: /s/ Leonard J. Sokolow
    --------------------------------------
    Authorized Representative

EMPLOYEE:


/s/ Timothy Mahoney
------------------------------------------
         Timothy Mahoney
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38126-38127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15598]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7930]

In the Matter of the Designation of Aitzol Iriondo Yarza, also 
known as Gurbitz, also known as Gurbita, also known as Barbas, also 
known as Balak as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to 
Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Aitzol Iriondo 
Yarza, also known as Gurbitz, also known as Gurbita, also known as 
Barbas, also known as Balak, committed, or poses a significant risk of 
committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. 
nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the 
United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.

[[Page 38127]]

    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 14, 2012.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-15598 Filed 6-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/Northern Trust Collective Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Randal Rein, as Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Randal ReinRandal ReinPrincipal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting OfficerMay 13, 2011
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-2 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 June 27, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 1 of 2 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Excel Corporation Sterling Silver

G-2 Specification

1 REQUIREMENTS

Beef carcasses certified under this specification shall meet the following requirements: 

a. Classed as Steer or Heifer carcasses only1;

b. U.S. Prime or Choice and have a minimum marbling score of Modest 01; 

c. Less than 30 months of age with lean color, texture, and firmness, meeting the requirements for

A maturity in the U.S. grade it qualifies for1;

d. Medium or fine marbling texture1, 2; 

e. Moderately thick or thicker muscling and tend to be at least moderately wide and thick in

relation to their length3;

f. No hump exceeding 2 inches in height 4; 

g. Practically free (not detracting from visual quality) of capillary rupture in the ribeye muscle;

and

h. Free of “dark cutting” characteristics.

2 CERTIFICATION

Carcasses to be examined for compliance with this specification shall be clearly identified and 

presented to an AMS grader for certification. Certification procedures for identification, the removal 

of preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, and 

control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment Division 

(QAD) procedures. 

3 LABELING

Labeling of products derived from certified carcasses must follow Food Safety and Inspection Service 

regulations and policy guidelines and QAD procedures. 

1 Determined in accordance with the “Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.” 2 Evaluated using the USDA-AMS-LS-SB-02 Marbling Texture card (included in the Official USDA Marbling Photographs.) 3 Muscle thickness is evaluated by averaging the thickness of the various parts, considering not only the proportion of each part of the 

carcass but also the general value of each part. Superior muscle thickness implies a high proportion of meat to bone and a high 

proportion of the weight of the carcass in the more valuable parts.

4 Measured from a line formed by the extension of the top line (including the fat) and measuring the lean muscle (excluding the fat) 

perpendicular to that line in the center of the hump.
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-2 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 June 27, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 2 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

4 FEES

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by an AMS grader involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the person, 

group, or plant requesting the service.

___________________________________

Chad Nelson, National Meat Supervisor

Quality Assessment Division

Livestock & Poultry Program
```

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Finlay Enterprises, Inc., (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect to
the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended October
28, 2006 (the "Report") that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: December 7, 2006

                                          /s/ Arthur E. Reiner
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Arthur E. Reiner
                                          Chairman, President and
                                          Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
```
### Faulk, Scott (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello, Brennan Lee-Namakaeha <keanu_1992@live.com> Thursday, November 14, 2013 1:21 PM EAS (OST) Support of Makani Kai for EAS in Kalaupapa i ,.
·.: ,. _ _,,

I fully support Makani Kai to have the EAS for Kalaupapa Settlement. They have serviced the peninsula superblyforthe past couple ofyears and Iwish forthem to continue this remarkable air service.

1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 02, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 02, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0319. DEWAYNE CLEMENTS A/K/A DEWAYNE A. CLEMONS v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

11CR1177
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1138 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the West Valley demonstration project, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1138 EH

1 SECTION 1. WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. 

2 (a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 3(a) of the West 

3 Valley Demonstration Project Act (Public Law 96–368; 

4 42 U.S.C. 2021a note) is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘$5,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

6 1981’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

7 2020 through 2026’’. 

8 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the 

9 date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

10 shall submit to Congress a report that describes— 

11 (1) the volumes, origins, and types of radio12 active waste at the Western New York Service Cen13 ter in West Valley, New York; 

14 (2) what options have been identified for dis15 posal of each such type of radioactive waste; 

16 (3) what is known about the costs of, and time17 frames for, each such option; 

18 (4) the benefits and challenges of each such op19 tion, according to the State of New York and the 

20 Department of Energy; and 

21 (5) as of the date of enactment of this Act— 

22 (A) how much has been spent on the dis23 posal of radioactive waste associated with the 

24 demonstration project prescribed by section 

25 2(a) of the West Valley Demonstration Project 

26 Act; and 
3 

•HR 1138 EH

1 (B) what volumes and types of radioactive 

2 waste have been disposed of from the Western 

3 New York Service Center. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1138 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the West Valley demonstration 

project, and for other purposes.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DOMENIC TRICOME,

 Petitioner

 v.

PAUL LARIVIERE, GMP

NUTRACEUTICALS, INC.,

 Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 35 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.