Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2012 / Notices 24537 

communication, the date, time, and 

duration of the communication, the 

medium of the communication, and a 

description of the subject matter of the 

communication (for a collection of 

communications solely concerning a 

single business arrangement that is 

specifically exempted from the 

reporting requirements of Section IV.C 

of this Final Judgment, the Settling 

Defendant may provide a summary of 

the communications rather than logging 

each communication individually); and 

J. Providing to the Department of 

Justice annually, on or before the 

anniversary of the entry of this Final 

Judgment, a written statement as to the 

fact and manner of the Settling 

Defendant’s compliance with Sections 

IV, V, and VII of this Final Judgment. 

VIII. Compliance Inspection 

A. For purposes of determining or 

securing compliance with this Final 

Judgment, or of determining whether 

the Final Judgment should be modified 

or vacated, and subject to any legally 

recognized privilege, from time to time 

duly authorized representatives of the 

Department of Justice, including 

consultants and other persons retained 

by the Department of Justice, shall, 

upon written request of an authorized 

representative of the Assistant Attorney 

General in charge of the Antitrust 

Division, and on reasonable notice to 

Settling Defendants, be permitted: 

1. Access during the Settling 

Defendants’ office hours to inspect and 

copy, or at the option of the United 

States, to require Settling Defendants to 

provide to the United States hard copy 

or electronic copies of all books, ledgers, 

accounts, records, data, and documents 

in the possession, custody, or control of 

Settling Defendants, relating to any 

matters contained in this Final 

Judgment; and 

2. To interview, either informally or 

on the record, the Settling Defendants’ 

officers, employees, or agents, who may 

have their individual counsel present, 

regarding such matters. The interviews 

shall be subject to the reasonable 

convenience of the interviewee and 

without restraint or interference by 

Settling Defendants. 

B. Upon the written request of an 

authorized representative of the 

Assistant Attorney General in charge of 

the Antitrust Division, Settling 

Defendants shall submit written reports 

or respond to written interrogatories, 

under oath if requested, relating to any 

of the matters contained in this Final 

Judgment as may be requested. Written 

reports authorized under this paragraph 

may, in the sole discretion of the United 

States, require Settling Defendants to 

conduct, at their cost, an independent 

audit or analysis relating to any of the 

matters contained in this Final 

Judgment. 

C. No information or documents 

obtained by the means provided in this 

Section shall be divulged by the United 

States to any person other than an 

authorized representative of the 

executive branch of the United States, 

except in the course of legal proceedings 

to which the United States is a party 

(including grand jury proceedings), or 

for the purpose of securing compliance 

with this Final Judgment, or as 

otherwise required by law. 

D. If at the time information or 

documents are furnished by a Settling 

Defendant to the United States, the 

Settling Defendant represents and 

identifies in writing the material in any 

such information or documents to 

which a claim of protection may be 

asserted under Rule 26(c)(1)(G) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and 

the Settling Defendant marks each 

pertinent page of such material, 

‘‘Subject to claim of protection under 

Rule 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure,’’ then the United States 

shall give the Settling Defendant ten 

calendar days notice prior to divulging 

such material in any civil or 

administrative proceeding. 

IX. Retention of Jurisdiction 

This Court retains jurisdiction to 

enable any party to apply to this Court 

at any time for further orders and 

directions as may be necessary or 

appropriate to carry out or construe this 

Final Judgment, to modify any of its 

provisions, to enforce compliance, and 

to punish violations of its provisions. 

X. No Limitation on Government Rights 

Nothing in this Final Judgment shall 

limit the right of the United States to 

investigate and bring actions to prevent 

or restrain violations of the antitrust 

laws concerning any past, present, or 

future conduct, policy, or practice of the 

Settling Defendants. 

XI. Expiration of Final Judgment 

Unless this Court grants an extension, 

this Final Judgment shall expire five 

years from the date of its entry. 

XII. Public Interest Determination 

Entry of this Final Judgment is in the 

public interest. The parties have 

complied with the requirements of the 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 

15 U.S.C. 16, including making copies 

available to the public of this Final 

Judgment, the Competitive Impact 

Statement, and any comments thereon 

and the United States’ responses to 

comments. Based upon the record 

before the Court, which includes the 

Competitive Impact Statement and any 

comments and response to comments 

filed with the Court, entry of this Final 

Judgment is in the public interest. 

Date: llllllllllllllll

Court approval subject to procedures set 

forth in the Antitrust Procedures and 

Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16 

llllllllll 

United States District Judge 

[FR Doc. 2012–9831 Filed 4–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs 

[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1589] 

Draft Standards and Best Practices for 

Interaction Between Medical Examiner/ 

Coroner and Organ and Tissue 

Procurement Organizations 

AGENCY: National Institute of Justice, 

DOJ. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In an effort to obtain 

comments from interested parties, the 

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of 

Justice Programs, National Institute of 

Justice, Scientific Working Group for 

Medicolegal Death Investigation will 

make available to the general public a 

document entitled, ‘‘Organ and Tissue 

Procurement Committee Standards and 

Best Practices for Interaction Between 

Medical Examiner/Coroner Offices and 

Organ Tissue Procurement 

Organizations’’. The opportunity to 

provide comments on this document is 

open to coroner/medical examiner office 

representatives, law enforcement 

agencies, organizations, and all other 

stakeholders and interested parties. 

Those individuals wishing to obtain and 

provide comments on the draft 

document under consideration are 

directed to the following Web site: 

http://www.swgmdi.org. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 12, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patricia Kashtan, by telephone at 202– 

353–1856 [Note: this is not a toll-free 

telephone number], or by email at 

Patricia.Kashtan@usdoj.gov. 

John H. Laub, 

Director, National Institute of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9842 Filed 4–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES