alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
• 

# 442 \ , J. Hardesty Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Writ relief is generally available, however, only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330. This court has consistently held that an appeal is typically an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.

We have considered the petition and appendix filed in this matter and conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. First, petitioner has failed to provide this court with any of the parties' pleadings or the parties' motions for summary judgment and the oppositions thereto that are essential for this court's consideration of the writ petition. NRAP 21(a)(4); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228-29, 88 P.3d at 844 (requiring petitioner to submit with his petition copies of any parts of the record before the respondent district court that are essential for this court to understand the issues presented). Second, petitioner has an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from any adverse final judgment. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED. 1

Parraguirre Cherry

'In light of this order, we deny petitioner's emergency stay motion.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2cc: Hon. Allan R. Earl, District Judge Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP Sklar Williams LLP Peel Brimley LLP/Henderson Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 3
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Oshawn J. Robinson, Petitioner, 

v. 

State of South Carolina, Respondent. 

Appellate Case No. 2014-000933 

Lower Court Case No. 2012-CP-23-07606 

Appeal From Greenville County 

The Honorable C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge 

The Honorable G. Edward Welmaker, Post Conviction 

Judge
 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2015-MO-018 

Submitted March 19, 2015 – Filed April 15, 2015 

REVERSED AND REMANDED 

Senior Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of 

Columbia, for Petitioner. 

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior 

Assistant Attorney General Karen Christine Ratigan, of 

Columbia, for Respondent. 
PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the dismissal, after a 

hearing, of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR). By separate opinion of 

this same date, we reversed the denial of PCR for petitioner's codefendant, 

Kenneth Workman. See Workman v. State, Op. No. 27514 (S.C. Sup. Ct. dated 

April 15, 2015). For the same reason set forth therein, we grant this petition for a 

writ of certiorari, dispense with further briefing, reverse the PCR judge's denial of 

relief, and remand for a new trial in petitioner's criminal case as well. 

REVERSED AND REMANDED. 

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., 

concur.
National Organic Standards Board 

Policy Development Subcommittee 

Consent Agenda Discussion Document 

July 19, 2020 

Summary: 

The PDS is discussing the use of a consent agenda for voting on Sunset items that are similar, in an effort 

to save time at the NOSB meetings. 

Discussion: 

A consent agenda is a board meeting practice where similar agenda items are grouped into a single 

agenda item for voting purposes. All items under a consent agenda can then be approved in one action, 

rather than board members filing motions on each item separately. Using a consent agenda can save 

time. Many private and governmental boards use a consent agenda for generally non-controversial 

items that do not require much, if any, discussion before a vote. 

For the NOSB, reviews of substances with multiple listings on the National List where the two reviews 

are essentially the same could be grouped for voting. For example, ammonium carbonate and 

ammonium bicarbonate, or copper substances, could be grouped. The consent agenda process allows a 

board member, for any reason, to remove an item from the grouping for further discussion, and possible 

separate vote. However, if the items are not singled out for discussion they can be grouped for voting 

thereby saving time. To maintain transparency the process would only be used for similar, noncontroversial items. 

The Policy Development Subcommittee is seeking feedback from the full Board and public commenters 

to see if there is support for this change before pursuing it further. 

Subcommittee Vote: 

Motion to accept the discussion document on the use of a consent calendar 

Motion by: Rick Greenwood 

Seconded by: Jesse Buie 

Yes: 4 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recuse: 0 

Approved by Rick Greenwood, Policy Development Subcommittee Chair, to transmit to NOP August 9, 

2020 

NOSB Proposals and Discussion Documents October 2020 173 of 173
Exhibit 10.2



Exhibit 10.2 Website Rights Agreement with Mr. Kranyak



                      WEB SITE --Rights Agreement between:

Dennis Kranyak
6397 Union Mill Road
Clifton, VA
20124

AND

To:
jesselivermore.com Inc.
1752 N.W. 3RD Terrace--Ste. 118c
Fort Lauderdale, Fl.--33311

Dated February 1, 1999

jesselivermore.com and Dennis Kranyak agree to develop a complete website
package located on the Internet that will follow the trading principles of Jesse
Livermore as out lined in Richard Smitten's two books listed below.

      The first book is to be published in December of 1999 and is called:
                "Jesse Livermore: World's Greatest Stock Trader"
           written by Richard Smitten and published by Traders Press.

                           The second book is called:
                 To be published in February of 2001 is called:
               "How To Trade in Stocks" written by Jesse Livermore
                   with additional updates by Richard Smitten.
                Both these books were published by Traders Press.


     Examples of some of the jesselivermore.com website features, but not all,
will include:

        Timing:

     1. Break outs to new highs with heavy volume.
     2. Identifying Pivotal Points and Continuation Pivotal Points
     3. Identifying One Day Reversals and Spikes
     4. Identifying Breakouts From A Consolidating Base
     5. Implement a System for Top Down Trading
     6. System To Implement Tandem Trading
     7. Identifying Direction of the Current Market
     8. Identifying Leading Sectors
     9. Identifying Leading Groups
     10. Building Stock Universes
     11. Pin pointing stocks that have had an increase in volume of more than
         50% of normal Volume.

     Money Management

     10. Portfolio/Probes Table
     11. Stop Loss Notification
     12. Overall Portfolio Management Table


     The completion of the 12 points outlined above to be featured on the
website, plus any others that may be agreed upon. These will be completed, on a
timely basis from the effective beginning date of November 19, 1999 and it is
anticipated that these will will be fully operational on the Internet by 2002.

     In return for 1,200,000 common shares of jesselivermore.com, I, Dennis
Kranyak, therefore, agree to grant exclusive ownership and permission to this
website to jesselivermore.com. The name of the website will be: Stock Market
Solutions.



Agreed to and signed: /s/ Dennis Kranyak 

Date:   February 1, 1999




Agreed to and signed:/s/ Richard Smitten on behalf of

jesselivermore.com


Date:  February 1, 1999
#### John Johnson, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida, *En Banc,*

October 22, 1907).

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Jackson county; J Emmet Wolfe, Judge.

*679No appearance for plaintiff in error.

W. H. Ellis, Attorney General, for the state.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in .error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant takes writ of error. Dismissed on motion of counsel for defendant in error.
Negative Declaration

Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials

The District has reviewed its permit files and the emission inventory for its federal Clean Air Plan, as well as business listings and telephone yellow pages, and has contacted potentially impacted businesses, and has determined that there are no stationary sources or emitting facilities for the following CTG category. The District also does not anticipate that any known businesses will propose constructing these sources in the future.

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT TITLE DOCUMENT TYPE DOCUMENT

NUMBER Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials CTG EPA-453/R-08-004
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Agriculture Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration 7 CFR Part 810
RIN 0580-AB12
 AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA.
 ACTION: Proposed rule; corrections.
 SUMMARY: This document corrects the preamble and the regulatory text to a proposed rule published by the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         of April 11, 2012, regarding a proposal to revise the U.S. Standards for Wheat under the U.S. Grain Standards Act. The proposed rule would change the definition of Contrasting classes in Hard White wheat and change the grade limits for shrunken and broken kernels. GIPSA believes that these proposed changes will help to facilitate the marketing of wheat.
 DATES: The comment period closing date for the proposed rule published April 11, 2012, at 77 FR 21685 remains June 11, 2012.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick McCluskey, (816) 872-1258.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2012-21685, published April 11, 2012, at 77 FR 21690, make the following corrections: Preamble Correction 1. On page 21685, in the third column, in the 
                    **ADDRESSES**
                     section, revise the mail entry to read: Irene Omade, GIPSA, USDA, STOP 3642, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room 2530-B, Washington, DC 20250-3604 2. On page 21687, in the second column, 16th line, the phrase “GIPSA does assume however, that there would be no functional downside” is revised to read “GIPSA does not assume however, that there would be no function downside”. Regulatory Text Correction 3. On page 21690, the “Maximum percent limits of” section of the table in § 810.2240(a) is correctly revised to read as follows: § 810.2240
  (a) * * * Grades and Grade Requirements 
 Maximum percent limits of:Defects:Damaged kernelsHeat (part of total)
0.2
0.2
0.5
1.0
3.0Total
2.0
4.0
7.0
10.0
15.0Foreign material
0.4
0.7
1.3
3.0
5.0Shrunken and broken kernels
2.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
20.0Total 1Wheat of other classes: 2Contrasting classes
1.0
2.0
3.0
10.0
10.0Total 3
3.0
5.0
10.0
10.0
10.0Stones
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
 Dated: April 11, 2012. Alan R. Christian, Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-9182 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the following meetings related to the transmission planning activities of the New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO):

## Joint Inter-Regional Planning Task Force/Electric System Planning Working Group

April 23, 2012, 11 a.m.-3 p.m., Local Time;

May 31, 2012, 10 a.m.-4 p.m., Local Time;

June 26, 2012, 10 a.m.-4 p.m., Local Time;

July 10, 2012, 10 a.m.-4 p.m., Local Time;

July 24, 2012, 10 a.m.-4 p.m., Local Time;

August 6, 2012, 10 a.m.-4 p.m., Local Time;

August 28, 2012, 10 a.m.-4 p.m., Local Time;

September 24, 2012, 10 a.m.-4 p.m., Local Time.

The above-referenced meetings will be held at: NYISO's offices, Rensselaer, NY.

The above-referenced meetings are open to stakeholders.

                    Further information may be found at                     *www.nyiso.com.*

The discussions at the meetings described above may address matters at issue in the following proceeding:

                    Docket No. ER08-1281,                     *New York Independent System Operator, Inc.*

                    For more information, contact James Eason, Office of Energy Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-8622 or                     *James.Eason@ferc.gov.*

Dated: April 17, 2012.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-9766 Filed 4-23-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE

COMMISSION,

 Petitioner

 v.

TEAMSTERS LOCAL 250,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 862 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      Dec-31-2000
<CASH>                                    354
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                            4016
<ALLOWANCES>                              (50)
<INVENTORY>                               114
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         4851
<PP&E>                                    936
<DEPRECIATION>                           (600)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          10898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    4098
<BONDS>                                  1339
<COMMON>                                  658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                               5709
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            10898
<SALES>                                 17753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        17769
<CGS>                                   15753
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           17306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       (257)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1765)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (1702)
<DISCONTINUED>                            (63)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1765)
<EPS-BASIC>                            (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (.32)

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 21** **SUBSIDIARIES    OF THE COMPANY**     Listed below are the significant subsidiaries of the Company and    their jurisdictions of organization. All are wholly-owned. Other    subsidiaries have been omitted because, considered in the    aggregate, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary.      **Name of Subsidiary** **Organization**      Bowne & Co., Inc.       Delaware     Bowne Business Communications, Inc.       New York     Bowne Enterprise Solutions, LLC      New York     Bowne International de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.       Mexico     Bowne International, LLC      Delaware     Bowne International, Ltd.       United Kingdom     Bowne International, SAS      France     Bowne Japan & Co, Inc.       Japan     Bowne MBC, LLC      Delaware     Bowne of Atlanta, Inc.       Georgia     Bowne of Boston, Inc.       Massachusetts     Bowne of Canada, Ltd.       Ontario, Canada     Bowne of Chicago, Inc.       Delaware     Bowne of Cleveland, Inc.       Ohio     Bowne of Dallas Limited Partnership      Delaware     Bowne of Europe, B.V.      Netherlands     Bowne of Los Angeles, Inc.       California     Bowne of New York City, LLC      New York     Bowne of Phoenix, Inc.       Arizona     Bowne of South Bend, Inc.       Delaware     Bowne Solutions, LLC      Delaware     Bowne Technology Enterprise, LLC      New York
Meat & 

Poultry 

Processing 

Technical 

Assistance

March 30, 2023 

1:30 - 4 PM 

Location: JBS Global Food Innovation 

Center, Colorado State University

Fort Collins, CO 

Limited Space- Register at 

ams.usda.gov/gradesstandards/beef/cattlecarcass-training-centers

Join USDA and industry experts to 

explore federal programs supporting 

independent processing expansion 

and connect to USDA-funded 

technical assistance. 

ams.usda.gov/mppta 

MPPTA Schedule 

1:30-2:30 PM: USDA Meat and 

Poultry Supply Chain 

Investments 

2:30 PM -3:15 PM: Federal 

Grant Application and Award 

Management 

3:15 PM -4:00 PM: MPPTA 

Technical Consultations 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
** **

** **

**Certifications**

 

 

I, Richard Simpson, certifythat:

 

1.        I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofBenchmark 2023-B39 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.        Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.        All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed inthis report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated parties: Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation; KeyBank National Association; K-Star Asset Management LLC; ParkBridge Lender Services LLC; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; Argentic Services Company LP; Wilmington Trust,National Association; and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC. 

 

 

Date:   March 28,2024

 

 

/s/ Richard Simpson

 

Richard Simpson

President, CitigroupCommercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

(senior officer in charge ofsecuritization of the depositor)
**Exhibit23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 333-79547) of Bridgford Foods Corporation of our report dated January 27,2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in theAnnual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report onForm 10-K.  We also consent to theincorporation by reference of our report dated January 27, 2005 relating to theconsolidated financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.
| **/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|
| **Orange  County, California**     |
| **January  31, 2007**              |

 

1

----
International Commodity Procurement Division Purchases 

FY2022 - Quarter 2 

Commodity Qty in MT PO Value Average Cost 

BEANS, PEA BAG-50 KG 110 $115,958.70 $1,054.17 

BEANS, PINTO BAG-50 KG 250 $301,441.70 $1,205.77 

CORN, YELLOW BAG-50 KG 250 $108,237.50 $432.95 

CORNMEAL BAG-HP-25 KG 18,700 $14,642,089.50 $783.00 

CORN-SOY BLEND PLUS BAG-HP-25 KG 8,400 $8,488,224.80 $1,010.50 

EMERGNCY FD, LNS-MQ POUCH-300/50 G 20 $79,839.90 $3,990.00 

EMERGNCY FD, SF-LNS POUCH-300/50 G 10 $36,918.45 $3,690.00 

FLOUR, ALL PURPOSE BAG-50 KG 310 $280,478.70 $904.77 

LENTILS BAG-50 KG 9,450 $11,013,845.10 $1,165.49 

OIL, SOYBEAN, CRUDE, DEGUMMED BULK 12,000 $16,656,000.00 $1,388.00 

OIL, SUNFLOWERSEED CAN-6/4 L 250 $892,573.71 $3,569.80 

OIL, VEGETABLE BOTTLE, PLS-6/4 L 670-719 410 $911,580.93 $2,223.17 

OIL, VEGETABLE CAN-6/4 L 17,280 $38,339,064.06 $2,218.63 

OIL, VEGETABLE PAIL-20 L 120 $331,930.20 $2,765.74 

PEAS, GREEN, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 150 $120,852.00 $805.68 

PEAS, GREEN, WHOLE BAG-50 KG 8,030 $5,487,732.50 $683.40 

PEAS, YELLOW, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 25,640 $22,182,203.20 $865.14 

RICE, 3/15 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 970 $546,439.30 $563.34 

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 1,640 $867,199.20 $528.78 

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 20,220 $11,844,440.30 $585.78 

RICE, 5/20 MG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 3,200 $2,210,240.00 $690.70 

RICE, MILLED BULK 13,930 $8,570,989.70 $615.29 

SALMON, PINK CAN-24/14.75 OZ 70 $503,468.12 $7,192.30 

SORGHUM BAG-50 KG 7,640 $3,266,466.00 $427.55 

SORGHUM BULK 123,070 $41,862,463.30 $340.15 

SOYBEAN MEAL BULK 47,440 $26,327,120.80 $554.96 

WHEAT, HARD RED WINTER BAG-50 KG 2,200 $1,339,800.00 $609.00 

WHEAT, HARD RED WINTER BULK 114,710 $45,164,747.80 $393.73 

WHEAT, SOFT WHITE BULK 148,010 $55,687,640.40 $376.24 

Grand Total 584,481 $318,179,985.87 

Commodity Qty in EA PO Value Average Cost 

BAGS, WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE- 50 KG 10,086,000 $6,186,956.30 $0.61