alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10-K

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or                15(d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                that |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March              27, 2008 |   | /s/RobertP.              Ambrosini                                         |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date                   |   | Vice              President and Chief Financial              Officer  |

----
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      SB-2 (No. 333-143496), Forms S-3 (No. 333-127095, No. 333-125602, No.
      333-122752, No. 333-33174, No. 333-34822 and No. 333-89973) and Forms S-8 (No.
      333-121041, No. 333-94603 and No. 333-82541) of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc.
      and subsidiaries, of our report dated October 15, 2007, relating to the
      consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2007 and 2006 and for the
      fiscal years then ended, which is included in this Form 10-KSB filing, which
      report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
      relating to the ability of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. to continue as a going
      concern.






/s/
      Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.




October
      15, 2007


Edison,
      New Jersey ****
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marion Stephens, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered August 11, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), and criminal use of drug paraphernalia in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the conclusion, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant knowingly possessed the cocaine in question *(see,*Penal Law § 220.25 [2]). The evidence demonstrated that when the police entered the curtained-off room where the defendant and his codefendants were found, the table around which they sat held a triple-beam scale with cocaine on it, as well as plastic bags and vials, some of which had been filled with the drug. In addition, more of the drug was located on a bookshelf near the defendant, as was a gym bag containing packaged cocaine and a bowl containing more vials. This evidence established the defendant’s close proximity to drugs and related packaging paraphernalia open to view in a room other than a public place, such that the defendant is presumed by statute to have knowingly possessed them *(see,*Penal Law § 220.25 [2]; *People v Harvey,*174 AD2d 754 [decided herewith]; *People v Riddick,*159 AD2d 596; *People v Alexan*
      *769
      *der,*152 AD2d 587). Furthermore, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Torres,*158 AD2d 730, 731).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                   SECOND AMENDMENT TO 1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN


         This Second Amendment to the Chico's FAS, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan,
which permits the grant of stock options with a vesting schedule more
accelerated than over a period of three years, is hereby adopted, effective
this 8th day of February, 2002, as follows:

         1.       The lead in paragraph to Section 2.4 is hereby amended in its
                  entirety to read as follows:

                        No ISO shall be exercisable either in whole or in part
                        prior to twelve (12) months from the date it is granted.
                        The Committee, in its discretion exercised at the time
                        that it grants an ISO, shall establish such further
                        restrictions on when an ISO shall become partially or
                        fully exercisable; and, unless otherwise specified by
                        the Committee in the grant and reflected in the option
                        agreement or certificate, the vesting provisions for the
                        ISO shall be in accordance with the following vesting
                        schedule:

         2.       The lead in paragraph to Section 3.4 is hereby amended in its
                  entirety to read as follows:

                        The Committee, in its discretion exercised at the time
                        that it grants a NSO, shall establish such further
                        restrictions on when a NSO shall become partially or
                        fully exercisable; and, unless otherwise specified by
                        the Committee in the grant and reflected in the option
                        agreement or certificate, the vesting provisions for the
                        NSO shall be in accordance with the following vesting
                        schedule:
Exhibit 21

                             BLACK HILLS POWER, INC.

              ACTIVE WHOLLY OWNED DIRECT AND INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES


            Acquisition Partners, LP, a New York limited partnership

   Adirondack Hydro - Fourth Branch, LLC, a New York limited liability company

        Adirondack Hydro Development Corporation, a Delaware corporation

    Adirondack Operating Services, LLC, a New York limited liability company

         Black Hills Colorado, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

            Black Hills Energy Capital, Inc., a Delaware corporation

     Black Hills Fountain Valley, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

     Black Hills Idaho Operations, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

              Black Hills Long Beach, Inc., a Delaware corporation

    Black Hills Nevada Operations, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

        Black Hills Nevada Real Estate Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited
                               liability company

          Black Hills Nevada, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

             Black Hills North America, Inc., a Delaware corporation

        Black Hills Southwest, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

           Black Hills Valmont Colorado, Inc., a Delaware corporation

  E NextA Equipment Leasing Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

                   EIF Investors, Inc., a Delaware corporation

        Fountain Valley Power, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

             Hudson Falls, LLC, a New York limited liability company

                                       1
<PAGE>


 Las Vegas Cogeneration Energy Financing Company, LLC, a Delaware limited
                               liability company

      Las Vegas Cogeneration II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

                Middle Falls Corporation, a New York Corporation

           Middle Falls II, LLC, a New York limited liability company

                     NHP, LP, a New York limited partnership

        North American Funding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

            NYSD Limited Partnership, a New York limited partnership

            NYSD Partners, LLC, a New York limited liability company

                 Sissonville Corporation, a New York corporation

            Sissonville II, LLC, a New York limited liability company

     Sissonville Limited Partners, LLC, a New York limited liability company

         Sissonville Limited Partnership, a New York limited partnership

          South Glens Falls, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

                  State Dam Corporation, a New York corporation

             State Dam II, LLC, a New York limited liability company

               Sunco Ltd., LLC, a Nevada limited liability company

                 Warrensburg Corporation, a New York corporation

   Warrensburg Hydro Power Limited Partnership, a New York limited partnership

               Warrensburg II Corporation, a New York corporation



                                       2
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                             396
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      421
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,388
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,164
<PP&E>                                          13,521
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,612
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,281
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,921
<SALES>                                          9,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,009
<CGS>                                            4,917
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        10
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,978)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR Electric Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(i)the enclosed Annual Report of NSTAR Electric Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(ii)the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NSTAR Electric Company.Dated: February 11, 2010/s/ THOMAS J. MAY
Thomas J. May
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Order entered June 12, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00115 - CV SHIHAB DIAIS AND ODE SSA DENTAL SOLUTIONS , P.A., Appellant s V. LAND ROVER DALLAS, L .P. AND SNELL MOTOR COMPANY OPERATIONS G P, LLC, GENERAL PARTN ER, Appellee s On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 13 - 01137



### O RDER We GRANT appellees’ June 10, 2015 second unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no late r than June 26, 2015

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS

APRIL 13, 2015

ABELACOSTA, CLERK No. PD-0186-15

PD-0186-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/7/2015 12:33:28 PM

Accepted 4/13/2015 2:15:31 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

ROBERT LYNN PRIDGEN,

Petitioner,

VS.

IN THE COURT OF

CRIMINAL APPEALS

THE STATE OF TEXAS § AUSTIN, TEXAS

PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

To the Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals:

Robert L. Pridgen, Petitioner, respectfully asks the Court for leave

to amend his petition for discretionary review (PDR) to correct errors in

the appendix.

The PDR was filed on time yesterday, April 6. The appendix to the

PDR contains photographs excluded from trial. (The photos are sexually

explicit; Pridgen requests that the PDR not be publicly filed.)

Pridgen respectfully asks the Court to accept and file the amended

PDR submitted with this motion. The PDR itself is unchanged. The only

changes were in the appendix:

• Correction of one typographical error (identity of one person

in photo was misstated);

Pridgen v. State, No. PD-0186-15

Pridgen's Motion for Leave to Amend PDR

Page 1 of3
• Addition of cover sheets A-l and A-2 to precede and separate

the two appendix items;

® Ehmination of unnecessary text to the A-2 photographs.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Mr. Pridgen's counsel

respectfully asks the Court to grant leave to amend his petition for

discretionary review.

Respectfully submitted this 7 of April 2015,

By:^

JAMES W, VOLBERDING

SEN: 00786313

100 E. Ferguson Street

Suite 500

Tyler, Texas 75702

(903) 597-6622

(866) 398-6883 (Fax)

e-mail:

jamesvolherding@gmail.com

Attorney for Petitioner,

Mr. Robert Lynn Pridgen

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this pleading has

been delivered this 7 day of April 2015 to:

Anderson Co. District Attorney

Courthouse

500 North Church Street

Palestine, TX 75801

Pridgen v. State, No. PD-0186-15

Pridgen's Motion for Leave to Amend PDR

Page 2 of 3
by the following means:

By U.S. Postal Service Certified Mail, R.R.R.

_X By First Class U.S. Mail

By Special Courier

By Hand Delivery

By Fax before 5 p.m. to (903) 723-7818

By Fax after 5 p.m.

By email.

Pridgen v. State, No. PD-0186-15

Pridgen's Motion for Leave to Amend PDR

Page 3 of 3

JAMES W. VOLBERDING
----

|  | 1. | The Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2016 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June 14, 2016 | By:    | /s/ Bowen S. Diehl                    |   |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Bowen S. Diehl                        |   |
|                      |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT N OT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED R USSELL ROWE , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 1918 LT Case No. 05

- 2017

- CF

- 010183

- A STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed June 28, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County , John M

. G riesbaum , Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Glendon George Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. C orrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C .J., WALLIS and TRAVER , JJ., c oncur.
#### VERNAL CITY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Jerry Dean CRITTON, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 14683.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 25, 1977.

Robert M. McRae, Salt Lake City, for defendant-appellant.

Ken Anderton, Vernal City Atty., Vernal, for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals a District Court trial de novo conviction of driving under the influence, having been previously convicted of the offense in Justice Court. He asserts Section 41-6-44.2, U.C.Á.1953,1 was *unconstitutionally applied*and that the admission in evidence of the result of a breathalyzer test without sufficient foundation was a *denial of due process.*

The Utah Constitution and case law are dispositive of this appeal. The pertinent constitutional provision is Article VIII, Section 9, which reads as follows:

> Appeals shall also lie from the final judgment of justices of the peace in civil and criminal cases to the District Courts on both questions of law and fact, with such limitations and restrictions as shall be provided by law; and the decision of the District Court on such appeals shall be final, *except in cases involving the validity or constitutionality of a statute.*[Emphasis added.]

*State v. Robinson,*
      *2*
      **and the numerous cases cited therein, interpret the foregoing constitutional provision and hold that where one does not contend in the court below that the statute under which he was charged was invalid, the decision of the District Court is final and not reviewable on appeal.

Defendant’s claim of unconstitutional application of the statute and lack of due process are clearly not challenges to the validity or constitutionality of the statute itself and hence there is no appropriate issue here for review.

Appeal dismissed.

. Provides as unlawful the driving of a motor vehicle by one having a blood alcohol content of .10% or greater.

. 23 Utah 2d 78, 457 P.2d 969 (1969).
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT M ar c h 27, 2007 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 12162

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 5 - 0 0 1 5 3 - C V- 4 - S P M/AK P I O N E E R M I L I T A R Y L E N D I N G O F G E O R G I A , I N C ., P la in tif f - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s B I L L M C C O L L U M , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lle e .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe N or the rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( M ar c h 27, 2007) B efo re E D M O N D S O N , C h i ef Ju d g e, B IR C H an d W IL S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: P io n ee r M il it ar y L en d in g o f G eo rg ia (“P M L G ”) ap p ea ls th e d istrict co u rt’s d e n i a l o f i t s mo t i o n f

o rap r e l i mi n a ry i n

j u n c t i o n . Be f

o r e th e d i s tr i c tc o u r t , PM LG2

s oughtt o e nj oi n the s t a t e of F l or i daf

r om i nve s t i ga t i ng i t s l e ndi ng pr a c t i c e s a nd s ubpoe na i ng i t s doc um e nt s on the gr ounds tha ts uc h r e gul a t ory a c t i vi ty vi ol a t e d the C o m m e r c e C lau s e . P M L G a r g u e d th a t s in c e its lo a n s w e r e lim ite d to n o n - r e s id e n ts of F l ori da, the st at e’ s i nt er es ti n regul at i ng P M L G l oans w as i nsuffi ci entt o j ust i fy th e b u r d e n o n P M L G ’s u n iq u e le n d in g p r a c tic e s . F in d in g th a t P M L G h a d f a ile d to dem on stra t e asubst ant i al l i kel i ho od of succ es s on the m er i t s, the di stri ctcourt de ni e d the i rm ot i on. T he gr a ntorde ni a l of

apr e l i m i na ry i nj unc t i on i s ade c i s i on w i thi n the d is c r e tio n o f

th e d is tr ic t c o u rt. C ar i l lon I m por te rs , L td. v . Fr ank

P e s c e I nte rn. G r o u p , L td., 112 F . 3d 1125, 1126 ( 11th C i r . 1997) ( pe rc ur i a m ) . O urr e vi e w of th i s d eci si o n i s ex trem el y n arro w i n sco p e an d w e w i l l rev erse o n l y i f th ere i s a c le a rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n . I

d. F ur the rm or e , w e pa y no a tt e nt i on t o the m e r i t s of the controvers y bey on d thatnece ss ary t o d et erm i ne the pres ence or abse nce of s uch an ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n . I

d. W e f i nd thatP M L G has f

ai l ed t o d em on stra t e thatre vers al i s warr a n t e d u n d e rth i s e x tr e m e l y d e f e r e n t i a l s t a n d a r d o f

r e v i e w. Ac c o r d i n g l y , we a f f i rm th e d e c i s i o n b e l o w. AF F I RME D.
EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, T. Joseph Coleman, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer of Sun Network Group, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best
of my knowledge:

(1)      the quarterly report on Form 10-Q and Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 of
         the Company for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report")
         fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated: June 12, 2003

                                       /s/ T. Joseph Coleman
                                       ---------------------
                                       Name: T. Joseph Coleman
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Acting Chief Financial Officer