alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

      

      

    

    
      FORIAN INC.

       

      FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2020 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

      

      

    

    
      This First Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of Forian Inc., a Delaware
        corporation (the “Company”), is effective as of the date set forth below. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Plan.

      

      

    

    
      Background

      

      

    

    
      A. The Plan was established to provide designated individuals with the opportunity to receive grants of incentive stock options,
        nonqualified stock options, stock awards, stock units, stock appreciation rights and other equity-based awards.

      

      

      B. Immediately prior to this Amendment, there are 4,000,000 shares of Company Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan.

      

      

      C. The Company desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan by an additional
        2,400,000 shares of Company Stock, each of which may be granted as Incentive Stock Options.

      

      

      D. Section 15(a) of the Plan permits the Company’s Board of Directors to amend the Plan at any time, subject to approval by the
        Company’s stockholders, as applicable.

      

      

    

    
      Amendment

      

      

    

     

    	

          	1.	
            Shares Authorized. Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to
                read as follows:

          


     

    	

          	A.	
            Shares Authorized. Subject to adjustment as described below, the aggregate number of shares of common stock of the Company (“Company Stock”) that may be issued pursuant to Grants under this Plan is 6,400,000 shares, each of
                which may be granted as an Incentive Stock Option.

          


     

    	

          	2.	
            General. The terms and conditions of Section 21 of the Plan shall apply to this
                Amendment and the Plan shall remain in full force and effect except as modified by this Amendment.

          


     

    	

          	3.	
            Effective Date. This Amendment shall be effective on the date on which it is
                approved by the Company’s stockholders.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

The Honorable E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building 400 Market Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101
Dear Secretary Abruzzo: On July 15,2014, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection (DEP) pertaining to the requirements ofClean Air Act Section 128 (State Boards) for all National Ambient Air Quality Standard pollutants. EPA has determined that this submittal is administratively and technically complete. EPA will be reviewing the revision and will prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice (DFRN) action
. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ruth Knapp, Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2191. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

cc: Ms. Joyce E. Epps, Director Bureau ofAir Quality, PADEP Sincerely,

Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division



# 0 Printedon I00% recycled/recyclablepaper with I00%post-consumer fiber andprocess chlorine free. Customer ServiceHotline: 1-800-438-2474
Marketing and Regulatory Programs – Agricultural Marketing Service – Specialty Crops Program – Specialty Crops Inspection Division 1 of 1

 Inspection Aid No. 26

 Canned Lima Beans - Guide for Scoring Clearness of Liquor, Defects, and Character July 2016

A B C

Clearness of Liquor - Score Points 2

10 9 8 7 6 5

Designation Practically Clear Reasonably Clear Fairly Clear

Cloudiness None Slight Somewhat Cloudy Cloudy

Rather viscous,

 Cream-like, or 

starchy

Sediment None Small amount Moderate 

amount

Considerable 

amount Considerable amount

Color of liquor −−−−− −−−−− Slightly dull Dull, but not to extent appearance is 

seriously affected

Defects - Score Points 2

25 24 23 22 21 1 20 1 19 1 18 1

Freedom from Defects Practically Free Reasonably Free Fairly Free

Defects, individually or collectively, may affect 

appearance or eating quality 

2 Not at all Not more than 

slightly Not materially Not seriously

Maximum allowable defects 

Extraneous vegetable matter, per 10 oz. dr. weight

Aggregate area of 1 surface in fractions of sq. inch

None 1/16 1/8 3/16 1/4 3/8 1/2 3/4

Loose Skins, percent by count 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 8

Broken Beans, percent by count 4 and 

Loose Cotyledons, percent by count 5 1 2 3 5 7 10 12 15

Sprouted Beans, percent by count 6 0 0 1 1 2 4 6 8

Blemished,

7

including seriously blemished 8

percent by count 0 1 2 2 3 3 4 4

Seriously Blemished Beans, percent by count 8 Maximum 1/2 of 1 percent 1 1 2 2

Character - Score Points 2 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 1 22 1 21 1

Designation Good Reasonably Good Fairly Good

Maturity Young Reasonably Young Nearly Mature

Tenderness Tender Reasonably Tender Firm and mealy, but not hard; 

or soft, but not mushy 

Width of Canned Lima Beans – (In Fractions of an Inch)

Midget – 28/64 or smaller, Tiny – over 28/64 to and including 30/64, Small – over 30/64 to and including 34/64, Medium – over 34/64 to and including 38/64, Large – over 38/64

 

1

Limiting Rule

2

If sample meets requirements for more than one numerical score, the lowest of such score points will be assigned.

3

“Loose Skin” whole skin or portions aggregating size of average whole skin which have become separated from cotyledons.

4

“Broken” – bean from which half or more of a cotyledon has become detached, or pieces aggregating size of average cotyledon.

5

“Loose Cotyledon” whole cotyledon which has become separated from the skin.

6

“Sprouted” bean is one which shows external shoot protruding beyond cotyledon or skin.

7

“Blemished” by discoloration, pathological or insect injury, or by other means (other than light discoloration), to such an extent that appearance or eating quality of bean or of 

 any detached piece is materially affected.

8

“Seriously Blemished” – to such an extent that appearance or eating quality of bean or detached piece is seriously affected.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF MARKETING  SERVICES GROUP, INC. AS OF AND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,  1999  INCLUDED  IN THIS  REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                             U.S. Dollars

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1
<CASH>                                    3,285,217
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                            27,785,615
<ALLOWANCES>                               (394,910)
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         32,530,448
<PP&E>                                    2,830,836
<DEPRECIATION>                           (1,326,010)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           97,626,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    42,177,319
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                    225,138
<OTHER-SE>                               48,702,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             97,626,949
<SALES>                                  82,241,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         82,241,894
<CGS>                                    52,510,154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            52,510,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         36,803,985
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          516,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (7,588,344)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 57,259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (7,645,603)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                             (7,645,603)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (1.39)


</TABLE>
J. J., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NOS. 1D14-4167 & 1D14-5089

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 6, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Charles W. Dodson, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, 

John Hedrick, Assistant Public Defender, and Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, 

and Matthew Pavese, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-33,972-99

EX P ARTE HERMAN LEE KINDRED, AK A P ONCHO, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. F R 30311-K IN THE 264T H DISTRICT COURT F ROM BELL COUNTY

Per curiam . W A L K E R , J., not participating.

O R D E R Applicant pleade d g uilty to burg lary of a habitation an d wa s s entenc ed to ten y ear s’ community supervision. His community supervision was later revoke d and he was sentenc ed to ten y ear s’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appea ls dismiss ed his appea l. Kindred v. State , No. 03- 85-00020-CR (Tex. App. — Austin Sept. 4, 1985) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the distr i ct cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. We have previously dismiss ed si x s u b s eq u ent applications in this cause . See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 4. I t is obvious from the rec ord that Applicant continues to raise g rounds2

that wer e previously reje cted on the merits or that should have been raised in previous applications. We h o l d t h at Applicant has abused the writ and filed a frivolous lawsuit. See Ex parte Jones , 97 S.W .3 d 5 8 6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); T E X . G O V ’ T C O D E § 498.0045(a- 1). Should Applicant file future habea s applications i n this cause , we will not consider the merits of h i s appli cations unl ess he shows that the fac tual or l ega l basis of his g rounds was unavailable in a previously filed application. This applica tion is di smissed. Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and the Boa rd of Par dons and Paroles.

Filed: Apr il 27, 2022 Do not publish
NOTICE OF OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET ACTION 

Date 03/13/2020 

Department of Agriculture 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

FOR CERTIFYING OFFICIAL: Gary Washington 

FOR CLEARANCE OFFICER: Ruth Brown 

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, OMB has taken action on your request received 

06/28/2019 

ACTION REQUESTED: Revision of a currently approved collection 

TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED: Regular 

ICR REFERENCE NUMBER: 201905-0581-003 

AGENCY ICR TRACKING NUMBER: 

TITLE: Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling of Covered Commodities 

LIST OF INFORMATION COLLECTIONS: See next page 

OMB ACTION: Approved with change 

OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 0581-0250 

The agency is required to display the OMB Control Number and inform respondents of its legal significance in 

accordance with 5 CFR 1320.5(b). 

EXPIRATION DATE: 03/31/2023 DISCONTINUE DATE: 

BURDEN: RESPONSES HOURS COSTS 

Previous 652,842 21,949,487 0 

New 20,966,789 20,966,789 0 

Difference

 Change due to New Statute 0 0 0 

Change due to Agency Discretion 0 0 0 

Change due to Agency Adjustment 20,313,947 -982,698 0 

Change due to PRA Violation 0 0 0 

TERMS OF CLEARANCE: 

OMB Authorizing Official: Dominic J. Mancini 

Deputy and Acting Administrator, 

Office Of Information And Regulatory Affairs 
List of ICs 

IC Title Form No. Form Name CFR Citation 

COOL All Covered 7 CFR 65 

Commodities
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of FAO, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending May 3, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry R. Welch, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  June 16, 2003 |                                                  | /s/  Jerry R. Welch |   |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|                           | Jerry R. Welch  Chief Executive Officer and President |                |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HYPERION SOFTWARE CORPORATION FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          71,624
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,800
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,186
<PP&E>                                          90,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 218,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,177
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           229
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   218,642
<SALES>                                         60,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,904
<CGS>                                           21,056
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,887
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  86
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,512
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,512
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
Inspected

by experts

Traced

from farm to store

Traced

from farm to store

Shaped

by public input

Protected

& enforced by law

Protected

by law

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

Final.pdf 13 2/23/2024 9:32:40 AM
IfcO-ZS'

ELECTRONIC RECORD [^lmlS

COA # 07-13-00149-CR OFFENSE: 22.021

Ernest Glenn Benton v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Collingsworth

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 100th District Court

DATE: 12/09/14 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 2878

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Ernest Glenn Benton v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#:

APPELLANT'S Petition CCA Disposition: _

FORDISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

R^L>5&J> JUDGE:

DATE: Owl# /jots' SIGNED:

14>0-/5T

\4>l-/5

JUDGE: fjuCt,fAAAS&>1— PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, R. Don Morris, President and Peter Passaro, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date:August 13, 2009By:/s/R. Don MorrisR. Don MorrisPresident and DirectorDate:August 13, 2009By:/s/Peter PassaroPeter PassaroChief Financial Officer and Director
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clyde T. Brooks, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contentions that the convictions of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree were against the weight of the evidence and that his sentence was harsh and excessive. Further, we find no merit to defendant’s contention that the statements defendant made to the police should have been suppressed because he was intoxicated at the time he made the statements. " '[P]roof that the accused was intoxicated at the time he confessed his guilt of crime will not, without more, bar the reception of the confession in evidence. But if it is shown that the accused was intoxicated to the degree of mania, or of being unable to understand the meaning of his statements, then the confession is inadmissible’ ” *(People v Schompert,*19 NY2d 300, 305, *cert denied*389 US 874). Because the proof at the suppression hearing failed to show that defendant was intoxicated to the degree of mania or that he was so intoxicated that he was unable to understand the meaning of his statements, we find no occasion to question the court’s determination that the statements were voluntarily given.

We have reviewed the contentions of defendant in his supplemental *pro se*brief and we find them lacking in merit or not preserved for review on appeal. One of the prosecution witnesses, a police officer, testified that he took notes concerning his questioning of defendant but he stated that he was unable to find them. After the witness made the statement, defense counsel made no application concerning the missing notes and, thus, he failed to preserve the issue for appellate review. Where *Rosario*material has been lost or destroyed, reversal is not required unless the defendant has been prejudiced by the People’s failure to preserve the material *(People v Martinez,*71 NY2d 937, 940). By failing to apply for any sanction because of the missing notes, defendant deprived the court of the opportunity to explore the issues of prejudice to *1051defendant and to determine the appropriate sanction, if any, to be applied *(see, People v Martinez, supra,*at 940).

We find, also, that defendant failed to preserve for appellate review the issue of whether the verdict was repugnant. If we were to decide this issue, we would determine that the verdict was not repugnant because the verdict of not guilty of intentional murder did not negate an essential element of the offense of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.—Manslaughter, 2nd Degree.) Present— Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 3:05 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: BB 1 & 2 memo 

The reductions are relative to the base case (baseline), right, not 2005? 

Table 2. Projected CO2 Emission Impacts 

CO2 Emissions

(MM Tonnes)

CO2 Emissions Reductions 

from Reference Case

(MM Tonnes)

CO2 Emissions Reductions: 

Percent Change from 

Reference

2020 2025 2030 2020 2025 2030 2020 2025 2030

Reference 2,161 2,231 2,256

Two-Block Regional 1,949 1,992 2,016 212 239 240 10% 11% 11%

Two-Block State 1,927 1,965 1,982 234 266 274 11% 12% 12%

Source: Integrated Planning Model run by EPA, 2014 

________________________________________________ 

Cortney Higgins, PhD 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov