alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rosemary L. Ross, Respondent, v Delbert Ross, Jr., Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: We agree with defendant’s contention that the judgment of divorce should be modified to provide that his obligation to maintain a life insurance policy in the face amount of $100,000 naming plaintiff as irrevocable beneficiary should cease upon the termination of his obligation to provide plaintiff maintenance or child support (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [8] [a]). We therefore modify the first sentence of the eleventh decretal paragraph to read, "ordered, adjudged and decreed, that Defendant shall be required to maintain in full force and effect the life insurance policy covering his life, under the payroll deduction plan provided by the U. S. Postal Service, and to designate Plaintiff as irrevocable beneficiary of this policy in the face amount of $100,000 until October 31, 1994”. We further modify the judgment of divorce to add a new decretal paragraph to *1046provide that defendant is awarded possession of the gun collection located at the prior marital residence and the 1981 Chevrolet Citation. Because the question of which party should pay the costs of maintaining the marital residence pending its sale was not raised before the trial court, we will not consider it for the first time on appeal. Any request for determination of that issue should be addressed to the trial court. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Willis, J.—Divorce.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Exhibit 32.4





Certification of the Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 US.C. Section, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Michael S. Sarner, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Capital Southwest Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.







Date:  December 13, 2018By:/s/ Michael S. SarnerMichael S. SarnerChief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of
Bowne & Co., Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, C. Cody Colquitt,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                        
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1.     The Report fully
    complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
|
| | 2.     The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    the Company.



| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ C. CODY COLQUITT                                 
| |                                                      
| | C. Cody Colquitt                                     
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

March 15, 2004
Hemp is an incredibly versatile crop that can provide strong fiber, nutritious seed and highly valuable phytocompounds including cannabinoids and terpenes. It is critical that USDA recognize the full value and potential of hemp and create regulations that allow farmers to tap into the entire potential of hemp. We encourage USDA to replace the “Statement of Principles on Industrial Hemp” issued jointly with FDA and DEA, with a new statement acknowledging that hemp is no longer a controlled substance and recognizing that valid hemp uses include all parts of the plant and are not limited only to “industrial purposes.

Carol Lapetino
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00230]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Hearings of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules 
of Bankruptcy Procedure

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcements: 77 FR H9828.

AGENCY: Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Judicial 
Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open Hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the 
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been canceled: Bankruptcy 
Rules Hearing, February 1, 2013, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin J. Robinson, Deputy Rules 
Officer and Counsel, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC. 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: January 2, 2013.

    Notice of Meeting Cancellation.
Benjamin J. Robinson,
Rules Committee Deputy and Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-00230 Filed 1-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
United States

Department of 

Agriculture

Agricultural 

Marketing 

Service

Fruit and 

Vegetable 

Programs

Fresh Products 

Branch

Okra for Processing

Inspection Instructions 

June 1966
FORMAL RECOMMENDATION BY THE

NATIONAL ORGANIC STANDARDS BOARD (NOSB) 

TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIC PROGRAM (NOP) 

Date: ____6-08-06____________________

Subject: Sunset Renewal Vote for Chlorine Materials under 205.605b synthetics allowed. 

Chair: Kevin O’Rell 

 

Recommendation

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action: _XXXXX_ 

Guidance Statement: ________ 

Other: ________ 

Statement of the Recommendation (including Recount of Vote):

Recommendation to Renew Chlorine Materials, 205.605b synthetics allowed. 

Moved: Julie Weisman Second: Nancy Ostiguy 

Yes – 12 

No – 0 

Abstain – 0 

Absent – 2 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with OFPA and NOP):

Sunset Material Vote 

Response by the NOP:
National Organic Standards Board 

Handling Committee 

Final Recommendation for Chlorine Materials 

April 20, 2006 

I. List: 205.605 Nonagricultural (nonorganic) substances allowed as ingredients in or on 

processed products labeled as “organic” or “made with organic (specified ingredients or 

food groups.” 

(b) Synthetics allowed 

II. Committee Summary: The federal register notice regarding Sunset Review asked the public 

to provide evidence and address concerns for any substance they believed should be discontinued. 

Of the many comments received recommending the continued allowance of chlorine materials in 

organic handling, there were no specific comments against the continuation of chlorine materials 

on the National List. 

In addition the NOSB requested that a Technical Evaluation Report be conducted reviewing 

chlorine use in organic handling. The NOSB received this technical report dated January 6, 2006, 

which favorably answered the criteria questions for substances to be used in organic handling. 

This technical review did not indicate that there is any new information about chlorine materials 

since its original petition that would make it inconsistent with organic practices. 

Based on the public comments from Sunset Review and the Technical Report, the Handling 

Committee recommends the continued use of the substance: chlorine materials. 

III. NOSB Recommendation(s): The handling committee recommends the renewal of the 

following substances in this use category as published in the final rule § 205.605(b): 

Chlorine materials - disinfecting and sanitizing food contact surfaces, Except, That, 

residual chlorine levels in the water shall not exceed the maximum residual 

disinfectant limit under the Safe Drinking Water Act (Calcium hypochlorite; 

Chlorine dioxide; and Sodium hypochlorite). 

Moved: Julie Weisman Second: Nancy Ostiguy 

 Board vote: Yes – 12 No – 0 Abstain – 0 Absent - 2
1 

NO. 14-15-00295-CV

 

In the Fourteenth District Court of Appeals

Houston, Texas

KHYATI UNDAVIA, MINU RX, LTD., AND MINU GP, LLC

Appellants, 

v. 

AVANT MEDICAL GROUP, P.A., D/B/A INTERVENTIONAL SPINE ASSOCIATES, AND 

BRETT L. GARNER, D/B/A ALLIED MEDICAL CENTERS

Appellees. 

On Appeal from the 152nd Judicial District Court, 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-22186

NOTICE OF UPDATE ON IDENTITY OF PARTIES

Ashish Mahendru

State Bar No. 00796980

amahendru@thelitigationgroup.com

Darren A. Braun

State Bar No. 24082267

dbraun@thelitigationgroup.com

MAHENDRU, PC

639 Heights Boulevard

Houston, Texas 77007

713-571-1519 

713-651-0776 fax 

APPELLATE COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS

ACCEPTED

14-15-00295-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/16/2015 9:46:12 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/16/2015 9:46:12 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2

NO. 14-15-00295-CV

In the Fourteenth District Court of Appeals

Houston, Texas

KHYATI UNDAVIA, MINU RX, LTD., AND MINU GP, LLC

Appellants, 

v. 

AVANT MEDICAL GROUP, P.A., D/B/A INTERVENTIONAL SPINE ASSOCIATES,

AND BRETT L. GARNER, D/B/A ALLIED MEDICAL CENTERS

Appellees. 

On Appeal from the 152nd Judicial District Court, 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-22186

NOTICE OF UPDATE ON IDENTITY OF PARTIES

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

Appellants, Khyati Undavia, Minu RX, Ltd., and MINU GP, LLC, file this 

Notice of Update on Identity of Parties. In Appellant’s Petition for Permission to 

Appeal Interlocutory Order, Appellant’s identified Compass Bank as a CoDefendant in this case. 
3

Since the filing of the Petition on April 6, 2015, Plaintiffs/Appellees filed a 

non-suit, dismissing Compass Bank from this lawsuit. See Exhibit A. 

Appellants file this notice to update this Court that Compass Bank is no 

longer a party to this action. 

Notwithstanding the non-suit, the substance of Appellant’s Petition remains 

the same. 

Date: April 16, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

MAHENDRU, P.C.

By: 

Ashish Mahendru

Texas Bar No. 00796980

Darren A. Braun

Texas Bar No. 24082267

639 Heights Boulevard

Houston, Texas 77007

(713) 571-1519 (Telephone)

(713) 651-0776 (Facsimile)

amahendru@thelitigationgroup.com

dbraun@thelitigationgroup.com

ATTORNEYS FOR 

DEFENDANTS—APPELLANTS
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing of Appellants’ 

Notice of Dismissal of Party was served on the following counsel of record on the 

16th day of April, 2015 via email:

Matias J. Adrogué via email: mja@mjalawyer.com

Robert Stephan Kaase

1629 West Alabama St.

Houston, Texas 77006

1629 West Alabama St.

Houston, Texas 77006

713-425-7270 (p)

713-425-7271 (f)

Counsel for Plaintiffs/Appellees

William P. Huttenbach via email: whuttenback@hirschwest.com

State Bar No. 24002330

Jacob M. Stephens

State Bar No. 24066143

Hirsch & Westheimer

1415 Louisiana, 36th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 223-5181 (Main)

(713) 223-9319 (Fax)

Counsel for Defendant Compass Bank

Ashish Mahendru
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

B.M., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-2558

[April 15, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; James L. Martz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502013CJ003561A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ellen Griffin, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See C.C. v. State, 150 So. 3d 216, 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) 

(Warner, J., concurring specially).

STEVENSON, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 30510 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. R IC O D E A N G E L O LA W R E N C E , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 5: 08- C R
- 337- 1 B ef ore R E AV L E Y , JO L LY , an d O W E N , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * R i co D ean gel o L aw rence app eal s the7 0- m o nth wi thi n- gui del i n es s en t en ce i m p ose dafter h e plead ed gu i l ty to con sp i ra cyto distrib u te an dto po sse ss w i th i nt entt o di strib u te 5 0 0 gr am s orm or e o f a m i xt ure ors ubst ance c ont ai ni ng a detect able am ou n tof cocai n e h yd rochl ori de (pow der coc ai n e) . La w rence argu es t h at th e sentence i s su bstantivel y u n reasona bl e an d that a 60- m on t h sentence w o u ldm o re a d e q u a te ly a d d re ss th e fac to rs se t for th in1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 (a )(1), (2 ), a n d(4). United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Ma rch 15, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-30510 Document: 00511051158 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/15/2010N o. 09- 30510

2 The r e c o r d s ho w s t hatt he di s t r i c t c o ur t ba s e d La w r e nc e ’ s s e nt e nc e o n t he ad vi s o r y gui de l i ne s r ang e , t h e info r m at i o n i n t he pr e s e nt e nc e r e po r t , a nd the 18 U . S . C . § 3553 ( a) fact ors. Th e courtconsi dered L aw rence’ s argum en t s f or a sen ten ce a t t h e b ottom of th e g u i d eli n es ra n ge an dthe G ov ern m en t’ s ar gu m en ts a g a i ns t s uc h a s e nt e nc e a nd d e t e r m i ne d t ha t a 7 0 - m o nt h s e nt enc e w as a p p r o p r ia te . L a w r e n c e is e s s e n tia llya s k in gth is co u r t t o s u b s tit u te h is a s s e s s me n to f

t h e a p p r o p r i a t e s e n t e n c e f o rt h a to f

t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r t , wh i c h we w ill n o t d o . S ee G allv. Un i t ed S t ate s , 5 5 2 U .S . 3 8 , 5 1 (2 0 0 7 ); Uni t e d St at e s v. Campo s - Maldo nado , 5 3 1 F .3 d3 3 7 , 3 3 9 (5 th C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 129 S. C t . 328 (2 0 0 8 ). H e h a s n o t e s ta b l i s h e d t h a t t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t a b u s e dits d is c r e tio n in i m po s i ng hi s s e nt e nc e , a nd h e ha s no tr e but t e d t he pr e s um pt i o n t hathi s w i t hi ng u id e lin e s s e n te n c e w a s re a s o n a b le . S eeG a ll , 5 5 2 U .S . a t 5 0 -5 1 ; Un i t ed S t ate s v. C i sneros- G u t i errez , 5 1 7 F .3 d7 5 1 , 7 6 4 (5 t h C ir . 2 0 0 8 ). T h e d is t r ic tc o u r t ’s j u d g me n ti s A F F I RMED. Case: 09-30510 Document: 00511051158 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/15/2010
LMR Swine and Pork

Lakisha Aller, Assistant Chief

USDA Market News
Mission and Role

Timely, accurate, and unbiased

Transparent market information for swine, 

pork, cattle, beef, and lamb

Provides information on: 

• price trends

• supply & demand

• various purchase and sales methods

Reflect what’s happening in the marketplace
What’s Covered?

APPLIES TO – Pork, beef, and lamb 

packers meeting reporting thresholds

REQUIRED – Packers must submit all 

livestock purchase transactions and 

wholesale meat sales transactions on 

a daily and weekly basis
Swine & Pork Reporting

Packers that annually slaughter or process an 

average of 100,000 barrows and gilts or 

200,000 sows and boars

55 plants report all transactions of hog 

purchases and domestic pork cuts

LMR captures 96% of hog and pork industry
Confidentiality

The Agricultural Marketing Act of 

1946 requires USDA to publish data 

and information in a manner that 

ensures confidentiality is preserved 

regarding the identity of persons, 

including parties to a contract; and 

proprietary business information.

3/70/20 Confidentiality Guideline
Resources

Homepage: www.ams.usda.gov/LPGMN

My Market News: 

https://mymarketnews.ams.usda.gov/

Datamart: https://mpr.datamart.ams.usda.gov/

LMR: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules- regulations/mmr/lmr
Contact Information

Lakisha Aller

Assistant Chief

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service | Livestock & Poultry Program

515-284-4460 | Lakisha.Aller@usda.gov

Visit us online at:

www.ams.usda.gov/LPGMN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0147

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ALEXANDER GARRETT LAFORGE III,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 21, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 10 2024

05/10/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0147
mo-iH

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 02-14-00390-CR OFFENSE: 64.01

Reginald D. Davis v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Tarrant

COA DISPOSITION: DISMJR TRIAL COURT: 297th District Court

DATE: 10/23/2014 Publish: NO TCCASE#: 0851753D

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Reginald D. Davis v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#: mo*iv

PRO S£

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

trfitjedDATE: O^ktlzOtr

JUDGE: /l* UsUa^^

Petition CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1001 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide a process by which 

a family member of a deceased individual who is eligible for the Department of Veterans Affairs burn pit registry may register for such registry 

on behalf of the deceased individual. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Mr. CASTRO of Texas (for himself, Mrs. WALORSKI, Ms. GABBARD, Mr. RUIZ, 

Mr. WELCH, Mr. THOMPSON of California, and Ms. NORTON) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide a 

process by which a family member of a deceased individual who is eligible for the Department of Veterans 

Affairs burn pit registry may register for such registry 

on behalf of the deceased individual. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Member Access 

5 to Burn Pit Registry Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1001 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR FAMILY MEMBERS TO REGISTER 

2 FOR DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

3 BURN PIT REGISTRY ON BEHALF OF DE4 CEASED ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS. 

5 Section 201 of the Dignified Burial and Other Vet6 erans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2012 (Public Law 

7 112–260; 38 U.S.C. 527 note) is amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub9 section (d); and 

10 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol11 lowing new subsection (c): 

12 ‘‘(c) REGISTRATION ON BEHALF OF DECEASED INDI13 VIDUALS.—In the case of a deceased eligible individual, 

14 the Secretary shall provide a process by which an imme15 diate family member of the individual may register for the 

16 burn pit registry under this section on behalf of the de17 ceased eligible individual.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.2
                                  ------------


                               GEORGE STEWART, CPA
                     2301 SOUTH JACKSON STREET, SUITE 101-G
                            SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98144
                        (206) 328-8554 FAX (206) 328-0383




To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of George Stewart, Certified Public Accountant consents to the
inclusions of my report April 17, 2002 on the Financial Statements of Coronation
Acquisition, Corp., as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, in any
filings that are necessary now or in the future with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission.



Very truly yours,


/s/George Stewart, CPA
-----------------------
George Stewart, CPA

April 18, 2002









                                  Page 52 of 52
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00386-CV

Christopher Martinez and all Occupants

v.

Anna Rodriguez

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2020-CCV-61041-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. No costs are assessed as the appellant filed 

an affidavit of inability to pay costs. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 10, 2020