alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE IV

FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL

FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL

CHAPTER 2

RIGHT OF ESTABLISHMENT

Article 55

(ex Article 294 TEC)

(ex Article 294 TEC)

Member States shall accord nationals of the other Member States the same treatment as their own nationals as regards participation in the capital of companies or firms within the meaning of Article 54, without prejudice to the application of the other provisions of the Treaties.

---
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Ames True Temper, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endingDecember 25, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), I, JudySchuchart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. |

/s/Judy Schuchart                        JudySchuchartChief Financial Officer (Principal FinancialOfficer)February 4, 2005

----
SW-846 Update V Abstract - 1 Revision 3 

 July 2014

ABSTRACT 

Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods (SW-846) provides test 

procedures and guidance which are recommended for use in conducting the evaluations and 

measurements needed to comply with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 

Public Law 94-580, as amended. These methods are approved by the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency for obtaining data to satisfy the requirements of 40 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) Parts 122 through 270 promulgated under RCRA, as amended. This manual 

presents the state-of-the-art in routine analytical testing adapted for the RCRA program. It 

contains procedures for field and laboratory quality control, sampling, determining hazardous 

constituents in wastes, determining the hazardous characteristics of wastes (toxicity, ignitability, 

reactivity, and corrosivity), and for determining physical properties of wastes. It also contains 

guidance on how to select appropriate methods. 

 Several of the hazardous waste regulations under Subtitle C of RCRA require that specific 

testing methods described in SW-846 be employed for certain applications. Refer to 40 CFR Parts 

260 through 270, for those specific requirements. Any reliable analytical method may be used to 

meet other requirements under Subtitle C of RCRA.
#### In the Matter of Michael D. Murphy, an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

January 28, 1992

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Jorge Dopico*of counsel *(Hal R. Lieberman,*attorney), for petitioner.

*Michael D. Murphy,*respondent *pro se.*

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Michael D. Murphy was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Judicial Department, on June 21, 1982.

By affidavit dated November 15, 1991, respondent moved to *86submit his resignation pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.11 as a member of the New York State Bar. In that regard, an examination of respondent’s papers indicates that his affidavit of resignation fully complies with the requirements of this court’s rules relating to the conduct of attorneys. He acknowledges that he is the subject of a pending investigation into allegations that he has been guilty of misconduct by improperly disbursing and applying escrow funds maintained in a client trust account; that his resignation is freely and voluntarily tendered; that he has not been subjected to coercion or duress; that he is fully aware of the implications of tendering his resignation; and that if charges were ultimately predicated upon the conduct for which he is under investigation, he could not successfully defend himself on the merits against such charges. Respondent has also submitted his resignation pursuant to section 605.10 of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR) to the chief counsel of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee, who recommends that the resignation be accepted.

Accordingly, respondent’s resignation from the New York State Bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law is accepted, and respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys, effective November 15, 1991, the date of the affidavit of resignation.

Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Kassal and Smith, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s resignation is accepted and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective January 28,1991.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TONY R. NAVARRO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4966 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 12, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hendry County; James D. Sloan, Judge. Tony R. Navarro, pro se.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. SILBERMAN, VILLANTI and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 21, 2012

d0514 

# Order

May 21, 2012

144527

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144527 COA: 298126 Wayne CC: 09-029908-FC CARLOS LAMONT HICKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
JAMES M. THOMAS,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3553

Opinion filed April 9, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

James M. Thomas, pro se, Petitioner.

Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida 

Commission on Offender Review, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

ROBERTS, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
EX-10.3
ASSIGNMENT OF WORKING INTEREST

                  OFFICIAL RECORDS INSTRUMENT # 200017569 1 Pg
Vol 1096 Page 446

                         ASSIGNMENT OF WORKING INTEREST
                         ------------------------------

       THIS ASSIGNMENT made and entered into this 1st day of December, 2000, by
and between Miller Oil Properties, Inc.., as Assignor and Nova Oil, Inc., 9518 N
Chance Lane, Spokane ,WA 99218-2200, as Assignee.

WITNESSETH:

       That, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Assignor does hereby BARGAIN, SELL, TRANSFER and CONVEY,
without representation of warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, and
without recourse to the Assignor, unto the Assignee an undivided 49.5% working
interest, being a net revenue interest of 38.61%, in and to the oil and gas
which may be produced, saved and marketed from the Smith Boswell #1. The legal
description being:

          Smith-Boswell #1 - 43.7342 Acre Unit in the Ruth Mackey Survey,
          Abstract 47, Bastrop County Texas, RRC # 19600

       The working interest herein assigned to be subject to all costs of
drilling, mining, completing and producing operations as well as all other
costs, and to be subject to its proportionate part of all ad valorem,
production, severance and other similar taxes.

EXECUTED This 18 day of Dec., 2000.

                                        By:  /s/W. Dale Miller
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Miller Oil Properties, Inc.

State of Texas

County of Denton

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 18th day of December,
2000, by W. Dale Miller, President of Miller Oil Properties Inc

WITNESS my hand and seal.

My Commission Expires: May 18, 2002


                                        /s/Sonya Grady
                                        ---------------
                                        Notary Public

                                        Sonya Grady
                                        Printed Name

FILED AND RECORDED
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS

/S/Shirley Wilhelm

2000 DEC 28 08:55 AM 200017569
      MITCHELL $9.00
Shirley Wilhelm COUNTY CLERK
      BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2023

- 0519

_____________________________
D ANIELLE M ICHELLE C OOPER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Timothy Register , Judge

.

December 4, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
K ELSEY , M.K. T HOMAS , and N ORDBY , JJ.
, concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender
, and Justin F. Karpf
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
TRIAL COURT OFFICIAL'S

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RECORD

FAX to: Cathy S. Lusk, Clerk, 12th Court of Appeals, Tyler, at (903)593-2193

Court of Appeals No. (If known): 12 - - - 

Trial Court Style:

Trial Court & County: Trial Court No.:

Date Trial Clerk's Record Originally Due:

Date Court Reporter's/Recorder's Record Originally Due:

Anticipated Number of Pages of Record:

I am responsible for preparing a record in this appeal but I am unable to file the record by the original due date for 

the following reason/s: (Check all that apply - attach additional pages if necessary.)

o to the best of my knowledge, the Appellant has made no claim of indigence and has failed to either pay 

the required fee or to make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record.

o my duties listed below preclude working on this record:

o Other. (Explain.):

I anticipate this record will be completed and forwarded to the 12th Court of Appeals by , and I 

hereby request an additional days within which to prepare it. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3. 

In compliance with TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e), I certify that a copy of this notice has been served on counsel for all 

parties to the trial Court's judgment or order being appealed. I further certify by my signature below that the 

information contained in this notice is true and within my personal knowledge.

Date Signature

Office Phone Number Printed Name

___________________________________ 

E-mail Address (if available) Official Title 

14 00335 CR

The State of Texas vs. Donnie Dale Carr

7th District Court, Smith County 007-0863-14

N/A

12-08-14

500+

X Reporter is currently working on the appellate

record in Aspect International, Inc & James Sterling v. David Tubb & Superior Shooting Systems, Inc., 

13-0367-A, an older case.

2-07-15

30

1-05-15

(903)590-1647

Jennifer Lowrance

jlowrance@smith-county.com

Official Court Reporter

 /s/Jennifer Lowrance

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/5/2015 3:35:13 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Trial Clerk's/Court Reporter's Request for Ext/12th CA-CsL/Tyler/12-3-97/Rev.5-3-2001

TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.5(e) reads:

Certificate requirements. A certificate of service must be signed by the person who made the service 

and must state:

(1) the date and manner of service;

(2) the name and addresses of each person served; and

(3) if the person served is a party's attorney, the name of the party represented by that attorney.

The following parties have been served with a copy of this document:

(Information may be either printed or typed.)

Lead Counsel for APPELLANT(S): Lead Counsel for APPELLEE(S):

Name: Name:

Address: Address:

Phone no.: Phone no.: 

Attorney for: Attorney for:

Lead Counsel for APPELLANT(S): Lead Counsel for APPELLEE(S): 

Name: Name:

Address: Address: 

Phone no.: Phone no.:

Attorney for: Attorney for:

Additional information, if any: 

Mr. Austin Reeve Jackson

112 East Line Street, Suite 310

Tyler, Texas 75702

(903)595-6070

Mr. Carr

Mr. Michael West

100 North Broadway, Fourth Floor

Tyler, Texas 75702

(903)590-1724

The State of Texas
Exhibit 12.1

BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

|                                                                                                  |  | Year Ended December 31 |        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | -------
|
|
|                                                                                                  |  |                        |        
|Interest costs                                                                                    |  | $                      | 134,930
|Guarantee of interest on ESOP debt                                                                |  |                        | 3,976  
|Interest capitalized during the period                                                            |  |                        | 391    
|Interest factor related to noncapitalized leases(a)                                               |  |                        | 15,974 
|                                                                                                  |  |                        |        
|Total fixed charges                                                                               |  | $                      | 155,271
|                                                                                                  |  |                        |        
|Income (loss) before income taxes, minority interest, and cumulative effect of accounting changes |  | $                      | 19,297 
|Undistributed (earnings) losses of less than 50% owned entities, net of distributions received    |  |                        | (8,695 
|Total fixed charges                                                                               |  |                        | 155,271
|Less:  Interest capitalized                                                                       |  |                        | (391   
|Guarantee of interest on ESOP debt                                                                |  |                        | (3,976 
|                                                                                                  |  |                        |        
|Total earnings before fixed charges                                                               |  | $                      | 161,506
|                                                                                                  |  |                        |        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                                |  |                        | 1.04   
|Excess of fixed charges over earnings before fixed charges                                        |  | $                      |       

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terrance Rayford, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the court erred in its charge on intoxication. The charge, when viewed in its entirety, did not impermissibly shift the burden of proof to defendant *(see, People v Lynch,*23 NY2d 262, 268-270). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Salvatore DAuria, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tut Systems, Inc. (the registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: November 14, 2006



By:

/s/    SALVATORE DAURIASalvatore DAuriaPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)
Inspected

by experts

Traced

from farm to store

Traced

from farm to store

Shaped

by public input

Protected

by law

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

B7 Test.pdf 3 2/29/2024 3:38:54 PM
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of White
Electronic Designs Corporation; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report does not contain any
untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report.
  /s/Dan TarantineDan TarantineInterim Office of the President,
Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Salvatore D’Auria,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of TutSystems Inc., on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained insuch Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of TutSystems, Inc.

 

 

|                   | By:    | /s/  SALVATORE D’AURIA                                    |   |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Salvatore  D’Auria                                        |   |
|                   |   | President,  Chief Executive Officer  and Chairman of the Board |   |
| Date: October 28, 2004 |   |                                                           |

 

----
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 16, 

2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00298-CV

THOMAS A. PHILLIPS D/B/A R2CM, Appellant

V.

GENE VINCENT AND KENDRA VINCENT, Appellees

On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-09-09419 CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant filed a notice of appeal from a judgment signed December 12, 

2014. The appeal was transferred to this court from the Ninth Court of Appeals. On 

April 9, 2015, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the parties 

have settled their dispute. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.