alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
 
I, **Harpreet S. Sangha**, certify that:

(1)         I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2007 of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

(2)         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)         Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:     January 21, 2008.
*"Harpreet S. Sangha"

By:        Harpreet S. Sangha*
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 14, 2015

Order 

April 14, 2015

150725(191)(194)

MARKELL VANSLEMBROUCK, Minor, by and

through ERIC BRAVERMAN, Conservator,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

KIMBERLY A. VANSLEMBROUCK,

Plaintiff,

v

ANDREW JAY HALPERIN, M.D., and WILLIAM 

BEAUMONT HOSPITAL,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

MICHIGAN INSTITUTE OF GYNECOLOGY

AND OBSTETRICS, P.C.,

Defendant.

SC: 150725

COA: 309680

Oakland CC: 2006-074585-NH

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellants to exceed the 

page limit restriction for their reply brief is GRANTED. The 25-page reply brief 

submitted on April 1, 2015, is accepted for filing. On further order of the Chief Justice, 

the motion of plaintiff-appellee to strike the reply brief and to recover the costs associated 

with filing the motion is DENIED.
According to USDA AMS Specialty Crops webpage, hemp is currently explicitly not considered to be a specialty crop (and therefore not eligible for federal or state specialty crops funding).  Will this change due to the 2018 Farm Bill? 

In addition, we received guidance from USDA NIFA that hemp can be considered a specialty crop by that agency (and therefore potentially eligible for USDA SCRI funding).  Is that currently the case?  Are there any final roadblocks to be cleared?  Lastly, do NIFA and AMS need to be harmonized with each other on this topic?

Thank you,

Mark E. Uchanski, Ph.D.

Colorado State University
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

IN THE MATTER OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL OBLIGATIONS BY THE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS (RESPONDENT) Docket No. 16

- 15-10

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above

- referenced Notice of Investigation init iated in accordance with FAA Rules of Practicefor Fede rally-A s sist e d Airport Enforcement Proceedings> 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules ofPractice)

. Pursuant to the Rules of Practice, §16.ll(a) , the date by which the Dir ector , FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysi s will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extended to on or before September 12, 2016.

# ~l!ltt-ni: Robin K. Hunt Acting Director, Office of Airport Compliance and Management AnalysisCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE



### I HEREBY CERTIFY tha t on May 

# d. 

# S , 2016 , I placed in the United States mail (first class, postage paid), a true copy of the Notice of Extens ion of Time addressed to:
Re spondent 

### W. Eric Pilsk Kaplan Kirsch & 

### Rockwell LLP Counsel to the Respondent 1001 Connecticut Avenue Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 Mark Duebner Director of Aviation City of Dallas 8008 Herb Kelleher Way , LB 16 Dallas, TX 75235
Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket Office of Airport Compliance and Management Anal ysis, AC0-1 00

# J~~ Cla udia Roberts Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

 

**** ****

**** ****

**** ****

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-111476), of Boston Edison Company of our report dated March 7, 2006 relating to the financial statements and the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

 

/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Boston, MassachusettsMarch 7, 2006
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Salvatore DAuria, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tut Systems, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tut
Systems, Inc.



By:

/s/    SALVATORE DAURIASalvatore DAuria Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)




Date: October 30, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 80 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 80

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 14, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Approving the request of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for a waiver 
        under section 1703E(f) of title 38, United States Code.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress approves the 
request for a waiver under

              

section 1703E(f) of title 38, United States Code, as submitted by the 
Secretary on December 6, 2019.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 13, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

I, James A. Konrath,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust (the Registrant), do hereby certify pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code) that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                          |  |  |  |     |  |                                                  
|------------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 18, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James A. Konrath                             
|                          |  |  |  |     |  | James A. Konrath                                 
|                          |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Accredited Mortgage
Loan REIT Trust and will be retained by Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Attachment 6

Marketing and Regulatory Programs

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration

Competitive Areas for Reduction-in-Force

Order of Release from Competitive Level -- Excepted Service

Tenure Group I

Includes each permanent employee whose appointment does not carry a restriction or 

condition, such as conditional, trial period, specific time limit, or indefinite. 

Tenure Group II

Includes employees serving a trial period and employees whose tenure is equivalent to 

career- conditional in the competitive service. 

Tenure Group III

Includes employees whose tenure is indefinite (i.e., without a specific time limit), but not 

actually or potentially permanent. It also includes employees whose appointments have 

a time limit of more than 1 year, or who have served in an appointment limited to 1 year 

or less, but who have been extended so they have actually worked more than 1 year 

without a break in service. 

Veterans’ Preference

Except for a retired member of the Armed Forces, an employee who is eligible for 

veterans’ preference for purpose of initial appointment to the Federal service is also 

eligible for veterans’ preference under the RIF regulation. Each of the three tenure groups 

are divided into three subgroups based upon entitlement to veterans’ preference for 

retention. The tenure subgroups are defined as: 

Subgroup AD: Employees entitled to veteran preference who have a compensable

service-connected disability of 30 % or more.

Subgroup A: Employees entitled to veterans' preference who are not eligible for 

subgroup AD.

Subgroup B: Nonveterans and employees who are not entitled to veteran

preference in subgroups AD and A.

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM FINLAY
ENTERPRISES,  INC.  FORM 10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                         2,762
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  30,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    246,362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               289,671
<PP&E>                                         76,404
<DEPRECIATION>                                 23,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 447,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          217,319
<BONDS>                                        213,685
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       76
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   447,570
<SALES>                                        134,592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,592
<CGS>                                          65,722
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  65,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               67,920
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,749)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,523)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,226)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,226)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.56)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 67531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26731]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary of Transportation

Notice of Availability of Guidance on Accelerated Decisionmaking 
in Environmental Reviews

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Transportation, Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DOT is announcing the availability of guidance implementing 
Section 1319 of MAP-21, on Accelerated Decisionmaking in Environmental 
Reviews. This section of MAP-21 provides for the use of errata sheets 
on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, in lieu of a Final EIS 
(FEIS), when the EIS has limited or factual changes. It also states 
that the lead agency under NEPA shall issue a combined FEIS and ROD 
unless circumstances exist to make it impracticable. This eliminates 
the 30-day wait period between the release of the FEIS and ROD. This 
guidance builds on the interim guidance that was released by FHWA and 
FTA in January 2013, but applies to the entire Department. The FHWA and 
FTA interim guidance is retained as a supplemental appendix specific to 
those agencies. The guidance is available at http://www.dot.gov/office-policy/transportation-policy/guidance-accelerated-decision-making-environmental-reviews.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Higgins, Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE. W84-318, Washington, DC 20590; 
email Rebecca.Higgins@dot.gov; telephone (202) 366-7098.

    Issue Date: November 3, 2014.
Shoshana Lew, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-26731 Filed 11-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING 

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND 

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE.

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT 

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S 

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT 

USDA, AMS, FVP, SCI

831 MITTEN ROAD, ROOM 200

BURLINGAME, CA 94010

PHONE: 650-552-9073

FAX: 650-552-9147

EQUIPMENT CATALOG
LIME COLOR

1 2 3 4

Green Blanched Blanched Yellowing

1. Green color.

2. Uniformly blanched because lime was uniformly shaded (quality)

3. Areas blanched because lime was partially shaded by a leaf, limb, or other 

fruit (quality).

4. Yellowing due to the ripening process (condition).

FOR IDENTIFICATION ONLY LIM-1-IDENT

DECEMBER 1998
SEEDED LIMES

Shape and Texture typical of “Seeded Limes” (Mexican, Key West Indian)

Upper photograph shows a cross-section cut of same specimen.

LIM-CP-1

April 1990 (Previously Aug. 1972)
SEEDLESS LIMES AND STYLAR-END BREAKDOWN

Shape and Texture typical of “Seedless Limes” (Persian and similar varieties). Photograph at left shows 

cross-section cut of same specimen.

Stylar-end Breakdown.

LIM-CP-2

April 1990 (Previously Aug. 1972)
LIMES

SLIDE 103
LIMES

SLIDE 104
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 30, 2019 

# Order

Clerk December 30, 2019

160719 (1 9 )

SONDRA HARDY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

and

STACI HAAG,

Plaintiff,

SC: 160719

v C OA: 351694

SECRETARY OF STATE and DIRECTOR

OF ELECTIONS,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of the American Civil Liberties Union of

Michigan to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on

December 27, 2019, is accepted for filing.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 17, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 17, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0112. FILIBERTA ALEMAN v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 17SC150905
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 10.32

                           AMENDMENT TO GTECH HOLDINGS
                       CORPORATION 1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN



         WHEREAS, GTECH Holdings Corporation (the "Corporation") established the
1997 Stock Option Plan (the "1997 Plan"), effective on May 21, 1997, for the
purpose of granting stock options to officers and other key employees of the
Corporation;

         WHEREAS, the 1997 Plan authorizes an aggregate of 2,800,000 shares of
the Corporation's stock for grants of stock options under th3 1997 Plan;

         WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to increase the number of shares
authorized under the 1997 Plan for grants of stock options to an aggregate of
3,000,000; and

         WHEREAS, the 1997 Plan authorizes the Board of Directors of the
Corporation to make certain amendments to the 1997 Plan without the consent of
the 1997 Plan participants or the Corporation's stockholders, including an
amendment to increase the number of shares of the Corporation's stock for grants
of stock options under the 1997 Plan provided that the amendment does not
materially increase the number of shares of stock that may be issued to
directors and officers of the Corporation.

         NOW THEREFORE, the 1997 Plan is amended as follows:

          1.   Effective on the date of adoption of this Amendment by the Board
               of Directors, Section 3 of the 1997 Plan is amended to provide
               that 3,000,000 shares of the Corporation's stock are authorized
               for stock options.

          2.   Except as provided in paragraph 1 above, the 1997 Plan remains in
               effect.


Adopted by the Board of Directors:

Date:    April 2, 2002

By:      _______________________
         Marc A. Crisafulli,
         Secretary
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




I, Donna
Brandin, the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Company”)
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:





(1) The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m); and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Donna
      BrandinDonna
      BrandinChief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)August
      16, 2010
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1117 

To clarify that individuals excepted from furlough and paid unemployment 

compensation on the basis of Federal service during any lapse in appropriations occurring in fiscal year 2019 are deemed eligible for such 

compensation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2019 

Ms. HILL of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To clarify that individuals excepted from furlough and paid 

unemployment compensation on the basis of Federal 

service during any lapse in appropriations occurring in 

fiscal year 2019 are deemed eligible for such compensation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shutdown Fairness 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1117 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION RELATED TO ELIGIBILITY FOR UN2 EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sions of law, beginning on December 22, 2018, any indi5 vidual who is paid unemployment compensation by a 

6 State, on the basis of the individual’s Federal service (as 

7 defined in section 8501 or 8521 of title 5, United States 

8 Code), for a week during fiscal year 2019 during any part 

9 of which a lapse in appropriations is in effect with respect 

10 to which the individual is excepted from furlough shall be 

11 deemed to be totally separated from Federal service and 

12 eligible for unemployment compensation benefits under 

13 subchapter I of chapter 85 of title 5 of the United States 

14 Code for such week. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply with 

16 respect to weeks beginning on or after December 22, 

17 2018. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS