alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION FOR THE FIFTY-TWO WEEKS
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997 AS SET FORTH IN ITS 10-K FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                      12,377,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,951,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                   577,156
<INVENTORY>                                 15,556,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,136,786
<PP&E>                                      42,285,721
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,432,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,663,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,454,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,393,298
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,212,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,663,892
<SALES>                                    127,859,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           127,859,491
<CGS>                                       80,621,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               80,621,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            36,583,639
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               149,050
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             235,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,654,354
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,049,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,605,354
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,605,354
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
        

</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-12652

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv-00286-KD-B

ERIC MYREE PERKINS, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

 versus

KUSHLA WATER DISTRICT, 

WILLIAM SILVER, 

ROY KING, 

JAMES TODD, 

 Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

 (April 13, 2015) 

Case: 14-12652 Date Filed: 04/13/2015 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Eric Perkins, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of 

summary judgment for Kushla Water District (“KWD”), William Silver, Roy 

King, and James Todd (“the defendants”), on his claims that the defendants 

discriminated against him on the basis of his race (African-American), maintained 

a hostile work environment, retaliated against him for filing a discrimination 

charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and constructively 

discharged him, in violation of Title VI, Title VII, § 1981, and § 1983.

Briefly stated, the appeal presents two issues:

1. Whether Perkins’s causes of action are vested in his bankruptcy estate so 

that he lacks standing to bring this appeal; and

2. Whether, in determining that Perkins failed to create a triable issue on his 

discrimination and retaliation claims, the district court erroneously viewed the 

evidence in the light most favorable to the defendants.

First, because the instant causes of action arose after Perkins filed for 

bankruptcy, the action did not become part of his bankruptcy estate; and his 

bankruptcy proceeding had no effect on his standing in the district court or on 

Case: 14-12652 Date Filed: 04/13/2015 Page: 2 of 3 
3

appeal. Second, contrary to Perkins’s contentions, the district court viewed the 

evidence in the light most favorable to him; but that court nonetheless concluded 

that he failed -- as a matter of law -- to establish a triable issue for his 

discrimination or retaliation claims. On appeal, Perkins has not challenged the 

district court’s legal standards, although he does quarrel about some immaterial 

facts. The district court mainly concluded that the evidence failed to show 

sufficient adverse employment acts or to show white employees were treated 

differently and better. Because Perkins has failed to point to a reversible error on 

the part of the district court, we affirm the grant of summary judgment for the 

defendants on all of his claims.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-12652 Date Filed: 04/13/2015 Page: 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Doug Berry, President and Chief Executive Officer of Sheer Ventures Inc., certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sheer Ventures

Inc.;



2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue

statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to

make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such

statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered

by this quarterly report;



3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all

material respects the financial condition, results of operations and

cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in

this quarterly report;



4.   The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as

defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and

have:



a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that

material information relating to the registrant, including its

consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within

those entities, particularly during the period in which this

quarterly report is being prepared;



b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls

and procedures as of March 31, 2005 (the Evaluation Date);



c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the

effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our

evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on

my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit

committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing

the equivalent functions):



(a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal

controls which could adversely the registrants ability to record,

process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for

the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal

controls; and



(b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or

other employees who have a significant role in the registrants

internal control over financial reporting; and



6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this

quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal

controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal

controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including

any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material

weaknesses.









Date:  May 10, 2005





/s/ Doug Berry

-------------------------------------------

Doug Berry, President and C.E.O.

Principal Executive Officer
(June 26, 1991)

#### In the Matter of Michael Raphael for Reinstatement as an Attorney, Petitioner.

—Application for reinstatement granted and petitioner, Michael Raphael, reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York, effective immediately. Order entered. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ. concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                         (Page 43)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000013191
<NAME>                        Boonton Electronics
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         113,041
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  971,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,210,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,606,721
<PP&E>                                       2,031,689
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,867,831
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,826,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,110,734
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       155,659
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,062,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,826,998
<SALES>                                      6,038,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,038,336
<CGS>                                        3,408,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,078,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,823)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (474,201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   225,073
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (699,274)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                350,405
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,049,679)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.72)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0383-14

ERIC RAY PRICE, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HAMILTON COUNTY

MEYERS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N

I do not agree with majority’s decision that assault by occlusion is a result-of-conduct

offense only. The majority’s conclusion that the strangulation is not the gravamen of this

offense is incorrect. The strangulation is the only thing that changed this offense from a

misdemeanor to a felony, which clearly demonstrates that the gravamen of assault by

occlusion is the conduct of strangling. The requirement that the defendant have strangled the

victim “by applying pressure to the person’s throat or neck or by blocking the person’s nose
Price dissent - Page 2

or mouth” describes the nature of the conduct, and therefore, a culpable mental state must

apply to it. McQueen v. State, 781 S.W.2d 600, 603 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989).

Error in the jury charge causes egregious harm when it affects the basis of the case or

deprives the defendant of a valuable right. Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157, 172 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1985). Failure to tailor the charge to include a culpable mental state for the nature

of the conduct likely caused egregious harm to Appellant. Because I would grant Appellant

relief and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, I respectfully dissent.

Meyers, J.

Filed: April 15, 2015

Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
12/31/99 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      13,641,000
<SECURITIES>                                35,806,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,148,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      64,366,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,176,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,252,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,054,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  93,400,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               105,252,000
<SALES>                                      7,135,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,682,000
<CGS>                                        6,183,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,183,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,015,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             450,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,034,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,129,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,905,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,905,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       4.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.30



</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JORGE FRANCISCO BRAVO-ROSAS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-10265

D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01009-NVW-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Linda R. Reade, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 6, 2015** 

Pasadena, California

Before: SILVERMAN and BEA, Circuit Judges and DONATO,*** District Judge. 

Jorge Francisco Bravo-Rosas appeals the length of his sentence for violating

the terms of his supervised release. Bravo does not appeal the district court’s

FILED

APR 13 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable James Donato, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
finding that he violated the terms of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

The parties have advised the court that Bravo was released on March 11,

2015. This appeal is therefore moot. See United States v. Polomba, 182 F.3d

1121, 1123, n.3 (9th Cir. 1999). 

DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              The Schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from the financial
                              statements for American Mortgage Investors Trust
                              and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
                              such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000878774
<NAME>                        American Mortgage Investors Trust
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,423,043
<SECURITIES>                                11,602,252
<RECEIVABLES>                               47,242,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,279,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,375,049
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,904,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,279,354
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,103,507
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               143,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                960,107
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   960,107
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1074

In Re: HARRY NOLAN MOODY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:07-cv-00127-LHT)

Submitted: August 27, 2009 Decided: September 4, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Nolan Moody, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Harry Moody petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the

docket sheet reveals that the district court denied the § 2255 motion and dismissed the action on August 20, 2009. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Moody’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JERRY MICHAEL CHANCE D/B/A 

OUTER LIMITS GAMEROOM,

 Appellant,

v.

ELLIOT & LILLIAN, LLC,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00248-CV

Appeal from the

153rd District Court 

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 153-257372-12) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause for 

further proceedings, in accordance with this Court’s opinion. We further order that Appellant 

recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall 

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Larsen, J. (Senior Judge)

Larsen, J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jack A. Cuneo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/ JACK A. CUNEO                    
|Jack A. Cuneo                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer

November 16, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/State Street Collective Trust (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Monet T. Ewing, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes
of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Monet T. EwingMonet T. Ewing Chief
Executive Officer May 17, 2010
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(b)

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

<PAGE>

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Accountants and
Financial Statements" in the prospectus and to the use of our reports (1) dated
February 15, 2002 with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and
schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company of New York and (2) dated
February 1, 2002 with respect to the subaccounts of Separate Account VA-2LNY,
which are available for investment by contract owners of the
Dreyfus/Transamerica Triple Advantage Variable Annuity, included in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4
No. 33-55152) and related Prospectus of Dreyfus/Transamerica Triple Advantage
Variable Annuity.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
April 25, 2002