alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 4 (Monday, January 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:30 p.m., Tuesday, January 9, 2013.

PLACE: U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE., 3rd Floor, Washington, 
DC

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Determination on seven original jurisdiction 
cases.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Patricia W. Moore, Staff Assistant 
to the Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE., 3rd Floor, 
Washington, DC 20530, (202) 346-7001.

    Dated: January 3, 2013.
Rockne Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-00112 Filed 1-3-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-P
• No GMOs

• Traced from farm to store

• No artificial colors, flavors, 

 or preservatives

Packaged Goods C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

Final.pdf 3 2/23/2024 9:32:35 AM
_____________ No. 95-2281WA

_____________ Tom Brown, * *

Appellant, * * v. * * Kenneth McKee; United States * Marshal's Service, * * Appellees, *

_________________________ * * Tom Brown; * *

Appellant, * * Byron R. Lawler; Lynn Earl * Conley; David Bryan Reed; * Jerold Jetton, Jr.; Lewis Reed; * Benjamin Pavan; Brent May, * * Plaintiffs, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Arkansas. * Kenneth McKee, Sheriff, * [UNPUBLISHED] Washington County, Arkansas; * United States Marshal's Service,* *

Appellees, *

_________________________ * * Tom Brown; * *

Appellant, * * v. * * Stephen E. Barnett; Robert * Jackson Bibey; Ronald Roe; * David Bryan Reed; Lynn Earl * Conley; Brent May; Jerold * Jetton, Jr.; Byron R. Lawler; * Terry Tague; * * Plaintiffs, * *

### -2-

Kenneth McKee, Sheriff * Washington County Sheriff's * Department, * * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: June 4, 1996 Filed: June 6, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________
PER CURIAM. Tom Brown appeals the district court 's judgment dismissing his three 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cases involving claims of denial-of-court-access , interferencewith religious freedom, and jail-cell overcrowding. Having carefullyreviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the district court correctly dismissed these actionsfor the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's thorough report. See8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: June 

### 8, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

SkyWest Airlines, Inc. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ), ) Docket No. FAA-2014-0322 Case No. 2012NM060030 Respondent

) .) ) ) )

-- )

) ) ) ) Docket No. FAA-2014-0686 Case No. 2014WP910006 Docket No. FAA-2014-0809 Case No. 2012NM060029 Docket No. FAA-2014-0810 Case No. 2012NM060123 Docket No. FAA-2014-0811 Case No. 2013NM060083 Docket No. FAA-2016-4267 Case No. 2015WP910079

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' SECOND JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS On April 6, 2016, the undersignedjudge granted in part the parties'joint motion to stay proceedings for a period of60 days and directed the parties to submit ajointreport stating the progress ofthe settlement negotiations by June 6, 2016. On June 6, 2016, the parties submitted a Second Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings. The parties explained that the negotiations involve 28 cases

### ~n various procedural postures, including four within the exclusivejurisdiction ofthe United States District Courts
.. In those four cases, the Respondent has entered into'!

### t~lljng_agr~_e!ll~nt 

## 'Y;i* the Department ofJustice through

i t __i. ., i "-·**~** u**~·**· ...· ..:. ?**~ ~** u**-~-**
;;**~** • '. t I • : ! "' ( •' ''

I t. rL i •October 1, 2016. The parties requested the proceedings in the above captioned cases be stayed until that same date. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.205(a)(8), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The parties' joint motion to stay proceedings is granted through October 1, 2016. 2. The parties must submit ajoint report .stating the progress ofthe global settlement negotiations, including an indication ofhow much additional time, ifany, the negotiations require, no later than October 1, 2016. 

# ----0 

# ,,e:::::_**~ASM.RAWALD.** Administrative Law Judge
Attachment: Service ListDocket No. FAA-2014-0811 (Civil Penalty Acti<?n) SERVICE LIST

- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1

Todd Emerson,'Respondent's Counsel SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 444 S. River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 ONE COPY**J~ffrey** M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 · U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
[No. 37544.

Department One.

June 24, 1965.]

#### Duane Emery, *Respondent,*v. Wendell Brown Agency, Inc., *Appellant.****

*Leavy & Taber,*by *James Leavy,*for appellant.

*Peterson, Taylor & Day,*by *Stanley D. Taylor,*for respondent.

*

Reported in 403 P.2d 671.

Per Curiam

There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury’s verdict in this case that there was a course of conduct between the parties such that appellant was obligated to notify the respondent of the expiration of the latter’s automobile insurance. This court will not substitute its judgment for that of the jury where *522there is substantial evidence to support the verdict. *Kasey v. Suburban Gas Heat of Kennewick, Inc.,*60 Wn.2d 468, 374 P.2d 549 (1962).

Nor can it be successfully contended that the erroneous testimony of the bank president would have altered the outcome in any way. The testimony of appellant’s agent, Richard D. Brown, rather than that of the bank president, established the course of conduct already referred to. One of the requirements to justify the granting of a new trial because of newly discovered evidence is that the new evidence will probably change the result, if a new trial is granted. *Nelson v. Placanica,*33 Wn.2d 523, 206 P.2d 296 (1949). We are not convinced that this requirement has been met here.

Judgment affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lester Binion, Jr., Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that *1058the People failed to establish that he had displayed what appeared to be a firearm while committing a robbery. Viewed in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence showed that defendant entered a restaurant and handed a note to the victim informing her that he had a gun, that, throughout the confrontation, he kept his right hand in his jacket pocket suggesting that he had a gun, and that the victim believed that he had a gun. Under these circumstances, the evidence was sufficient to convict defendant of robbery in the second degree *(see, People v Watts,*151 AD2d 307, *lv denied*74 NY2d 821; *People v Knowles,*79 AD2d 116; *see also,*Penal Law § 160.10 [2] [b]; *People v Lopez,*73 NY2d 214, 222, n 2; *People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932; *People v Suarez,*157 AD2d 757).

We have examined defendant’s other contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.—Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Lawton, Lowery and Davis, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Bureau of the Public Debt

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of the Treasury published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 2, 2013, inviting the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on continuing information collections to reduce paperwork and respondent burden. This document contained incorrect references.                    

*Correction:*                         In the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 2, 2013, in FR Doc. 2012-31534, make the following corrections:                    
      - Page 149, in the second column, replace OMB Number: “1535-0089” with OMB Number: “1535-0114”.

Dated: January 2, 2013.

Bruce A. Sharp,

Bureau Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2013-00005 Filed 1-4-13; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
Exhibit 23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We have issued our reports dated June 14, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Capital Southwest Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2016. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Capital Southwest Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-207296, effective October 5, 2015; File No. 333-177433, effective October 21, 2011; File No. 333-177432, effective October 21, 2011; File No. 333-118681, effective August 31, 2004).

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP



Dallas, Texas

June 14, 2016

 

 



---

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 23, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 23, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0288. CHRISTOPHER M. HUNT, SR., et al. v. GWINNETT COUNTY

COMMISSIONERS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

14A03838
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00108-CV

V. Belafonte Friar

v.

Christopher Blaschke, Independent Executor of the Estate of Mary Anna Majefski 

Windelmann, Deceased

On Appeal from the

County Court of DeWitt County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11347A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The Court 

orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its 

opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 9, 2015
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (the
"Registration Statement") of our report dated April 25, 2002, relating to the
financial statements of the Prudential Individual Variable Contract Account,
which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the use in this
Registration Statement of our report dated February 12, 2002, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of The Prudential Insurance Company of
America, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
April 25, 2002



                                       1
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1235 

To provide that the term of office of certain members of the Merit Systems 

Protection Board shall be extended by a period of 1 year, to limit 

such members from concurrently holding positions within the Federal 

Government, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. CUMMINGS (for himself and Mr. CONNOLLY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To provide that the term of office of certain members of 

the Merit Systems Protection Board shall be extended 

by a period of 1 year, to limit such members from 

concurrently holding positions within the Federal Government, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘MSPB Temporary 

5 Term Extension Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1235 IH

1 SEC. 2. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD MEMBERS: 

2 TERM EXTENSION AND LIMITATION ON SERV3 ICE. 

4 (a) EXTENSION OF TERM.—The term of office of any 

5 member of the Merit Systems Protection Board appointed 

6 under section 1202 of title 5, United States Code, serving 

7 as such a member on the date of enactment of this Act 

8 shall be extended for a period of one year beyond the date 

9 the member’s service would otherwise end under sub10 section (c) of such section. 

11 (b) LIMITATION ON HOLDING FEDERAL POSITIONS

12 CONCURRENTLY.—Notwithstanding section 1201 of title 

13 5, United States Code, any member of the Merit Systems 

14 Protection Board whose term is extended by subsection 

15 (a) may not, while serving as such a member, concurrently 

16 hold another office or position in the Government of the 

17 United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0432

IN THE MATTER OF:

V.K.B.,

A Youth.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 9, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

James Jeremiah Shea

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 7 2021

05/07/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0432
cc: Matthew J. Silva 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I947A
FORMAL RECOMMENDATION BY THE

NATIONAL ORGANIC STANDARDS BOARD (NOSB) 

TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIC PROGRAM (NOP) 

Date: ___3/29/07_____

Subject: _Revision to the NOSB Policy and Procedures Manual – sunset review 

annotations

Chair: __Andrea Caroe__ 

 

Recommendation

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action: _______

Guidance Statement: ________ 

Other: __X___ 

Statement of the Recommendation (including Recount of Vote):

Acceptance of the policy to exclude annotations during sunset review – (Section VIII, 

p52) 

NOSB Vote: Motion: R. Delgado Second: B. James 

Board vote: Yes - 13 No- 0 Abstain- 0 Absent - 2 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with OFPA and NOP):

The proposed revision formalizes a procedure followed by the Board since its 

formation and allows its members to review sunset materials in an effective 

manner.

Response by the NOP:
National Organic Standards Board 

Final Recommendation for 

Revision to the NOSB Policy and Procedures Manual regarding 

annotations during sunset review 

Date: 3/29/07 

I. List: (where in FR rule example 205.606) 

N/A 

II. Committee Summary: 

The proposed revision allows NOSB members to review sunset materials in an effective manner. 

III. Board Recommendation 

To accept a policy to exclude annotations during sunset review (Section VIII of the 

NOSB Policy and Procedures Manual). 

Board vote: 

Moved: R. Delgado Second: B. James 

Board vote: Yes- 13 No- 0 Absent- 2 Abstain-0 Recuse -0
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(a)

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
<PAGE>

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports
(1) dated February 15, 2002 with respect to the statutory-basis financial
statements and schedules of Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company and
(2) dated February 1, 2002 with respect to the subaccounts of Separate
Account VA-2L, which are available for investment by contract owners
of the Dreyfus/Transamerica Triple Advantage Variable Annuity, included in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4
No. 33-49998) and related Prospectus of Dreyfus/Transamerica Triple Advantage
Variable Annuity.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
April 25, 2002
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Briggs &
Stratton Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John S. Shiely, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ John S. Shiely     
|John S. Shiely         
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 28, 2008        

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50198

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HERMAN SALDANA JR

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CR-258-ALL

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Herman Saldana, Jr.,

raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. De Jesus

Batres, 410 F.3d 154, 162 (5th Cir. 2005), which held that proof of specific intent

to violate immigration laws is not an element of the offense of alien harboring.

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 12, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00559-CR

Carmelina Ornelas VALENZUELA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B10726

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

SIGNED April 8, 2015.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 -73

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/06

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 06 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 10.9.2









                                       May 15, 1996



Mr. James J. Judge
Senior Vice President
  and Treasurer
Boston Edison Company
800 Boylston Street
Boston, MA  02199

Dear Jim:

At its April 25, 1996 meeting, the Board of Directors voted to adopt a Special
Retention Program to provide particularly valued employees with an incentive
to remain in the employment of the Company during the next three-year period.
I am pleased to inform you that the directors agreed with my assessment that
your contributions will be very important to the success of the Company during
this critical time.

Under the terms of the Agreement adopted by the Board, if you remain
continuously in the employment of the Company through December 31, 1998, the
Company will pay you an amount equal to the difference between the Performance
Share Plan award which the Board determines to award you in January, 1999, if
any, and $50,000.  The net effect of this program is to guarantee you, if you
stay for the required period, a long-term incentive plan bonus in January of
1999 which will be no less than $50,000.

I look forward to, and depend upon, your assistance over the next three years
in positioning the Company to thrive in the new industry environment.

Sincerely,


/s/ Thomas J. May
--------------------------
    Thomas J. May
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Bowen S. Diehl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:





1The Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2019, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2019 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.





Date:  June 4, 2019By:/s/ Bowen S. DiehlBowen S. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer