alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9547]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice With Respect to List of Countries Denying Fair Market 
Opportunities for Government-Funded Airport Construction Projects

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 533 of the Airport and Airway Improvement 
Act of 1982, as amended (49 U.S.C. 50104), the United States Trade 
Representative (USTR) has determined not to list any countries as 
denying fair market opportunities for U.S. products, suppliers, or 
bidders in foreign government-funded airport construction projects.

DATES: Effective Date: Date of Publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Heilman Grier, Senior Procurement 
Negotiator, Office of the United States Trade Representative, (202) 
395-9476, or Greta Milligan, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the 
United States Trade Representative, (202) 395-4678.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 533 of the Airport and Airway 
Improvement Act of 1982, as amended by section 115 of the Airport and 
Airway Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1987, Public Law 100-223 
(codified at 49 U.S.C. 50104) (``the Act''), requires USTR to decide 
whether any foreign country has denied fair market opportunities to 
U.S. products, suppliers, or bidders in connection with airport 
construction projects of $500,000 or more that are funded in whole or 
in part by the government of such country. The list of such countries 
must be published in the Federal Register. USTR has not received any 
complaints or other information that indicates that U.S. products, 
suppliers, or bidders are being denied fair market opportunities in 
such airport construction projects. As a consequence, for purposes of 
the Act, USTR has decided not to list any countries as denying fair 
market opportunities for U.S. products, suppliers, or bidders in 
foreign government-funded airport construction projects.

Ronald Kirk,
United States Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 2012-9547 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-W2-P
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7856]


Waiver and Certification of Statutory Provisions Regarding the 
Palestine Liberation Organization Office

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me as Deputy Secretary of 
State, including by section 7086(b)(1) of the Department of State, 
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. 
L. 112-74, Div. I), the Delegation of Authority in the President's 
Memorandum of July 21, 2010, and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority No. 245-1, I hereby determine and certify that the 
Palestinians have not, since the date of enactment of that Act, 
obtained in the UN or any specialized agency thereof the same standing 
as member states or full membership as a state outside an agreement 
negotiated between Israel and the Palestinians, and waive the 
provisions of section 1003 of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987, Public 
Law 100-204, Title X.
    This waiver shall be effective for a period of six months.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress promptly and 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 9, 2012.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-9932 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
EXHIBIT 10(a)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 5
to  Registration  Statement  No.  333-68879  on Form  N-1A of our  report  dated
February 12, 2002  appearing  in the December 31, 2001 Annual  Report of Merrill
Lynch  Large Cap Growth  Focus  Fund of Mercury  V.I.  Funds,  Inc.,  renamed to
Merrill Lynch Large Cap Growth V.I. Fund of Mercury V.I. Funds, Inc., and to the
reference  to us under the caption  "Financial  Highlights"  in the  Prospectus,
which is part of such Registration Statement.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
April 16, 2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Bennett, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment in excess of that promised. The record indicates that, at the time defendant entered his plea, there was no promised sentence.

Also without merit is defendant’s contention that the sentence should be vacated because certain documents detailing the facts underlying prior convictions were presented to the court at the time of sentencing, and not 10 days prior to sentencing as required for a pre-sentence memorandum *(see,*CPL 390.40 [2]). Although it would have been better practice to submit those written materials within the time for submission of the pre-sentence memorandum, defendant’s attorney had the materials on the day before sentencing, defendant conceded that he had no excuse for his conduct, and defendant’s wife indicated that defendant had received psychiatric treatment for his conduct and that the psychiatrist had opined that the treatment was successful. Defense counsel did not *1060request an adjournment, either at the pre-sentence conference or during sentencing. Defendant had the opportunity to, and did, respond to the written materials, and the circumstances do not warrant vacating the sentence *(see, People v Mullgrav,*137 AD2d 839, 840, *lv denied*71 NY2d 1030). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A0 66 0

. THOMAS W ARREN ENTER P RI SES, I N C. v

. SUNSET HI LL
STONEW ARE, LLC.

Th i s cas e o ri g in at ed i n m ag i s t rat e co u rt

. Aft er an ad vers e ru l i n g, p l ai n t i ff

Th o m as W arren En t erp ri ses , In c., ap p eal ed to t h e s u p eri o r co u rt

. In t h e s u p eri o r

co u rt , Th o m as W arren En t erp ri s es fi l ed an am en d ed co m p l ai n t . Th e s u p eri o r co u rt

en t ered s u m

m ary ju d g m en t in fav o r o f d efen d an t Su n s et Hi l l St o n eware, an d Th o m as

W arren En terp ri s es fi l ed t hi s d i rect ap p eal . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Becau s e t he o rd er at i s su e d i s p o s es o f a d e n o v o ap peal fro m a m ag i s t rat e co u rt

d eci s i o n , Th o m as W arren En terp ri s es was req u i red to fo l l o w t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

p r o c e d ures

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ); Bu l l ock v. S a n d

, 2 6 0 Ga. Ap p

. 8 7 4

, 8 7 5
(5 8 1 SE2 d 3 33 ) (2 0 0 3 ). “ Ev en wh en t h e s u p eri o r co u rt d eci d es an i s s u e t h at was n ot

rai s ed o r co n s i d ered in th e m ag i s t rat e co u rt

, an y ap peal t o t h is co urt m u s t b e p u rs u an t

t o t h e d i s cret i on ary ap p eal p ro ced u re beca u s e t h e cas e reach ed t h e s u peri o r co u rt

t h ro u g h a d e n o v o ap p eal fro m t h e m ag i s t rat e co u rt .” Bu ll o ck

, s u p ra at 8 7 6. It s fai l u re

t o d o s o d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t hi s ap p eal

, wh ich i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/14/2015 January 14, 2015
Opinion issued April 14, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00131-CR

———————————

IME OKON EKWERE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1446601

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Ime Okon Ekwere, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of theft.1

 

The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of 

 1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.03(a), (e)(5) (West Supp. 2014).
2

appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to ten years’ 

confinement. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial 

court’s permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 

2006); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification

showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the 

record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. 

The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the 

defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record 

supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must 

dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App.

2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an 

appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must 

dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the 

appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.
3

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

(Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



BNSF Railway Company



In connection with the Annual Report of BNSF Railway Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned, Matthew K. Rose, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas N. Hund, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge on the date hereof:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                 |  |  |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 16, 2006 |  |                                                 |  | 
|                         |  |                                                 |  | 
|                         |  | /s/ Matthew K. Rose                             |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas N. Hund                                  
|                         |  | Matthew K. Rose                                 |  |  |  |  |  | Thomas N. Hund                                      
|                         |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BNSF Railway Company and will be retained by BNSF Railway Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CALIFORNIA WALNUT BOARD

Marketing Order No. 984 

Term Ends July 31

MANAGER:

Robert Verloop

Phone: (916) 932-7070

RVloop@walnuts.org

CHAIRPERSON:

Jack Mariani

Phone: (530) 662.3311

jack@maraininut.com

GROWERS

District Members Alternates Term Ending

District 1 William D. Carriere

Glenn, CA

Jeff Gallagher

Rio Oso, CA

2025

District 1 Ben Walsh

Orland, CA

Michael Petz

Tracy, CA

2025

District 2 Brent Barton

Escalon, CA

Vacant 2025

District 2 Gregory Wiersma

Visalia, CA

Benjamin Crane

Merced, CA

2025

At-Large Michael Machado

Linden, CA

Michael Andersen

Vina, CA

2025

HANDLERS

District Members Alternates Term Ending

District 1 Eric Heidman

Stockton, CA

Dick Wolf

Stockton, CA

2025

District 1 Jack Mariani

Winters, CA

John Aguiar

Winters, CA

2025

District 2 Mike Poindexter

Selma, CA

William Cox 

Thornton

Hughson, CA

2025

District 2 Frank Guerra

Hollister, CA

Brock Middleton

Hughson, CA

2025

PUBLIC

Members Alternates Term Ending

Rachael Goodhue, Ph.D.

Berkeley, CA

Jerome B. Siebert, Ph.D.

Moraga, CA

2025
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING 

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND 

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE.

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT 

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S 

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT 

USDA, AMS, FVP, SCI

831 MITTEN ROAD, ROOM 200

BURLINGAME, CA 94010

PHONE: 650-552-9073

FAX: 650-552-9147

EQUIPMENT CATALOG
CABBAGE 

Scoring Guide for Seedstems 

The Standards states that U.S. No. 1 shall consist of heads which are free from seedstems; an

defined as heads which have seed stalks showing or in which the formation of seed stalk ha

Photo I Photo II 

U.S. No. 1 

Seedstem with no seed stalks, allowed under definition 

in standards. 

Seedstem with seed stalks plainly b

scored. 

(DISREGARD PUFFINESS)

(pre
CABBAGE 

The handbook states that heads which have noticeable bumps or bulges caused by seedstems scored; and, heads in which a seed stalk penetrates the outer leaves should be scored as serio

Photo III Photo IV 

Seedstem has penetrated the outer leaves (on left) or 

the seed stalks have developed to seriously affect 

appearance, score as serious damage. 

Score as serious dama

(DISREGARD PUFFINESS) 

(pre
CABBAGE 

WELL TRIMMED AND POORLY TRIMMED HEADS 

Cabbage, Photo No. 1

August 1990

(Previously No. 1, no date)
CABBAGE 

STEMS PROPERLY AND IMPROPERLY TRIMMED. 

Ca

(Previou
CABBAGE 

BOTH HEADS ILLUSTRATE LOWER LIMIT OF REASONABLE SOLIDITY FOR 

SOUTHERN DOMESTIC TYPE WHICH SHALL BE AT LEAST FAIRLY FIRM FOR 

U.S. NO. 1 GRADE. 

Cabbage, Photo No. 3

August 1990

(Previously No. 3, no date)
CABBAGE 

HEAD ON LEFT OVER-RIPE, NOTE BASE OF LEAVES SEPARATING FROM STEM. MIDDLE HEASTEM BREAKING THROUGH CROWN. HEAD ON RIGHT SHOWS BAD WORM INJURY. NONE OU.S. NO. 1.

Cabba

(Previousl
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24538-24539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9801]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. EA-12-050, EA-12-051; ASLBP No. 12-918-01-EA-BD01]


Fukushima-Related Orders Modifying Licenses; Establishment of 
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28,710 (1972), and the 
Commission's regulations, see, e.g., 10 CFR 2.104, 2.105, 2.300, 2.309, 
2.313, 2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety 
and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to preside over this 
proceeding, which involves the following consolidated cases:

All Operating Boiling Water Reactor Licensees With Mark I and Mark 
II Containments: Order Modifying Licenses With Regard to Reliable 
Hardened Containment Vents (Effective Immediately) Docket No. Ea-12-
050
All Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in 
Active or Deferred Status: Order Modifying Licenses With Regard To 
Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Effective Immediately) 
Docket No. Ea-12-051

    This proceeding concerns requests for hearing submitted by Pilgrim 
Watch (April 2, 2012) and requests for hearing submitted by co-
petitioner Beyond Nuclear (April 3, 2012) challenging: (1) an 
immediately effective order issued to all operating boiling water 
reactor licensees with Mark I and Mark II Containments directing that 
they modify their licenses with regard to reliable hardened containment 
vents, published in the Federal Register on March 19, 2012 (77 FR 
16,098); and (2) an immediately effective order issued to all power 
reactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or 
deferred status directing that they modify their licenses with regard 
to reliable spent fuel pool instrumentation, published in the Federal 
Register on March 19, 2012 (77 FR 16,082).
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Alan S. Rosenthal, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
E. Roy Hawkens, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dr. Anthony J. Baratta, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in

[[Page 24539]]

accordance with the NRC E-filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in 
August 2007 (72 FR 49,139).

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day of April 2012.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2012-9801 Filed 4-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the
period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: July 28, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/    JEFFREY KATZENBERG            
|                     |  |  |  | Jeffrey Katzenberg                   
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|                     |  | 
|Dated: July 28, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/    LEWIS W. COLEMAN              
|                     |  |  |  | Lewis W. Coleman                     
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order filed, March 23, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-01088-CV

____________

TANGLEWOOD HOMES ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant

V.

STEWART A. FELDMAN, MARLA B. FELDMAN AND MICHAEL T. KELLY, 

TRUSTEE, Appellee

____________

NO. 14-11-01089-CV

____________

STEWART A. FELDMAN, MARLA B. FELDMAN AND MICHAEL T. KELLY, 

TRUSTEE, Appellant

V.

TANGLEWOOD HOMES ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-65420

ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due January 13, 2012, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. To date, Michelle Tucker's portion of the record has not been filed with the court. 

Michelle Tucker has filed a motion for extension of time to file the record which is GRANTED 

IN PART AND DENIED IN PART with the following order.

We order Michelle Tucker, the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal on

or before April 14, 2012, and NO FURTHER EXTENSION WILL BE ENTERTAINED. 

The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is 

timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Michelle Tucker does not timely file the record as 

ordered, the Court may issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine 

the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10793

Conference Calendar

 

JESSIE R. TORRES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FIRST NAME UNKNOWN HAYS, Captain;

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION

Defendants-Appellees.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:98-CV-121

---------------------

February 9, 1999

Before BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

Texas state prisoner Jessie R. Torres, #702908, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint 

with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) as frivolous and for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We 
No. 98-10793

- 2 -

have reviewed the record and Torres’s brief and conclude that 

Torres has failed to identify any error in the dismissal. See

Torres v. Hays, No. 2:98-CV-0121 (N.D. Tex. Jun. 25, 1998). 

Torres’s appeal is without arguable merit and therefore

frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2. We caution Torres that any additional frivolous

appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition

of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Torres is further cautioned to

review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.