alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Since we are basically starting a new industry, can we please address an issue that causes way too much uncertainty (and costs, ....) - THC levels in hemp.

0.3% is an arbitrary number that should be adjusted at this time.  THC is an active molecule so it's percentage of the plant material evolves. The only way to curb all the uncertainty is to create a larger range.

Why not use a THC range of up to 1% or 2% or 10% (as some individual states have in their hemp laws) when differentiating between hemp and marijuana?   Or perhaps a ratio of CBD:THC?  That would be the most scientific as keeping the intoxication out of hemp is desired.

Thank you for your time,

Russell Huxhold
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1254 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to achieve parity between the cost 

of living adjustment with respect to an annuity under the Federal Employees Retirement System and an annuity under the Civil Service Retirement System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. CONNOLLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to achieve parity 

between the cost of living adjustment with respect to 

an annuity under the Federal Employees Retirement 

System and an annuity under the Civil Service Retirement System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal COLA Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1254 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN COLA FOR FERS ANNUITIES. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of subsection (b) 

3 of section 8462 of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

4 to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(1) Except as provided in subsection (c), effective 

6 December 1 of each year, each annuity payable from the 

7 Fund having a commencing date not later than such De8 cember 1 shall be increased by the percent change in the 

9 price index for the base quarter of such year over the price 

10 index for the base quarter of the preceding year in which 

11 an adjustment under this subsection was made, adjusted 

to the nearest 1 12 ⁄10 of 1 percent.’’. 

13 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub14 section (a) shall apply to— 

15 (1) any cost-of-living adjustment under section 

16 8462 of title 5, United States Code, made after the 

17 date of the enactment of this Act; and 

18 (2) any annuity covered by such section com19 mencing before, on, or after such date. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
April 14, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CARLOS ALBERTO BUSTOS, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00872-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1019 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a full military honors 

ceremony for certain deceased veterans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Mr. PANETTA (for himself, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. CRENSHAW, and Mrs. LURIA) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a full 

military honors ceremony for certain deceased veterans, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Full Military Honors 

5 Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FULL MILITARY HONORS CEREMONY FOR CERTAIN 

7 VETERANS. 

8 Section 1491(b) of title 10, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1019 IH

1 ‘‘(3) The Secretary concerned shall provide full mili2 tary honors (as determined by the Secretary concerned) 

3 for the funeral of a veteran who— 

4 ‘‘(A) is first interred or first inurned in Arling5 ton National Cemetery on or after the date of the 

6 enactment of the Full Military Honors Act of 2019; 

7 ‘‘(B) was awarded the medal of honor or the 

8 prisoner-of-war medal; and 

9 ‘‘(C) is not entitled to full military honors by 

10 the grade of that veteran.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Order entered November 6, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01421
- CV AKBAR ALESHA, LLC, Appellant
V. QUIK
- WAY RETAIL ASSOCIATE S II, LTD., Appellee On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 01224
- D 

### O RDER On October 17, 2013, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal . The timeliness of the notice of appeal was dependent on the trial court granting appellant’s pending “Rule 30 6a motion.” See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 306a4

- 5; T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 4.2. On October 28, 2013, appellant in formed the Court that the trial court had denied appellant’s rule 306a motion . Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s extension motion. In its extension motion, appellant urged that if the trial court denied its rule 306a motion, appellant’s notice of appeal could serve as a notice of restricted appeal

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.1( d )(7), 30. Appellant’s notice of appeal, however, does not comply with the requirement s of a notice of restricted appeal. See id. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.1(d)(7). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file , within ten days of the date of this order, an amended notice of restricted appealthat i s in compliance with the rules. See id. We caution appellant that failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice.

/Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Veronica Carpio founder of Grow Hemp Colorado (GHC) an open source hemp org in Colorado, hemp farmer, hemp seed breeder and MJ drug felon6 main points to address1. 2018 Farm bill gave allowance for States and Tribes to be MORE restrictive in their hemp program.... the discriminatory exclusion included in the hemp language in the farm bill, placed a 10 year ban on drug felons ONLY, this ban does not cover the worst kinds of felons like murders, rapist, child molesters and other violent felons which states and tribes may want to protect against and keep outIndustry stakeholders ask that USDA to please clarify in rule, that States/tribes are allowed to have additional restrictions on any type of felons not just drug felons?2. There is currently a Pay-to-play hemp group called the US Hemp Roundtable, pushing and passing hemp legislative language in multiple states which includes the federal 10 year felon ban but intentionally leaves out the grandfather clause in the farm bill, which exempted drug felons from this discriminatory restriction if they were licensed or registered under the 2014 farm bill. When writing rules and regs, please clarify that States and Tribes are NOT allowed to be more restrictive regarding this provision, again please clarify in rule that grand fathered drug felons, like myself and many others, can operate in all states and tribal programs regardless if grandfather clause left out in state/tribal hemp language. 3. Hemp Industry stakeholders request USDA clarification on weather CBD from industrial hemp is legal to both cultivate and sell in a retail market place regardless of the FDA's current position and authority4. As mentioned, in 2015 Colorado became the first state to create a hemp seed certification program. As other states do the same it becomes important that domestic certified hemp seed is eligible for plant variety protection? please include this eligibility in the rules and regs. We also ask that USDA does not make a requirement which only allow certified hemp seed to be planted as the majority of the hemp industry does not support this agenda at this time. 5. GHC stakeholders also support hemp testing standardization but would also request and strongly encourage that the USDA to please provide a testing variance allowance of at least 15% for the 0.3%thc delta 9 concentration total on a dry weight basis in the finial established rules. 6.  A. Finally, please DO NOT required any further restriction on age for those who can grow hemp B. Please also clarify in rule that only the hemp applicants and or licensees will be the only ones required to be finger printed and back ground checked, NOT everyone who will be handling plants, especially minors or those who have access to hemp field as this makes zero sense and it is cost prohibitive. C. Last, please do not create any specific deadlines for hemp farming applications and allow the states to adopt them if they so choose to or not. Thank you again for your time, all efforts made for today’s webinar and future efforts by USDA to ensure we have a thriving us hemp industry which benefits the whole not just a select few.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 7, 2010



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                              
|Dean L. Cash                                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer of      
|ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION FOR THE FIFTY-THREE
WEEKS ENDED NOVEMBER 3, 1995, AS SET FORTH IN ITS FORM 10-K FOR SUCH
FISCAL YEAR, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-03-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-03-1995
<CASH>                                       7,366,362
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,697,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                   505,623
<INVENTORY>                                 13,849,947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,258,422
<PP&E>                                      35,430,317
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,065,322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,623,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,763,845
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     9,453,816
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,405,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,623,417
<SALES>                                    112,497,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           112,497,590
<CGS>                                       71,854,739
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               71,854,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            30,011,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               138,650
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             166,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,630,855
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,040,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,590,855
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,590,855
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
23.1
  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-121041 and 333-82541) of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. of our
report dated November 15, 2010, on the financial statements of MSGI Security Solutions,
Inc., which report appears on Page 26 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended June 30, 2010.
  /s/ L J
Soldinger Associates, LLC
  L J
SOLDINGER ASSOCIATES, LLC
  Deer
Park, Illinois
 November
15, 2010
H. R. 1138 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To reauthorize the West Valley demonstration project, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. 

(a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 3(a) of the West Valley Demonstration Project Act (Public Law 96–368; 42 U.S.C. 2021a note) 

is amended by striking ‘‘$5,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1981’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

2020 through 2026’’. 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress 

a report that describes— 

(1) the volumes, origins, and types of radioactive waste 

at the Western New York Service Center in West Valley, New 

York; 

(2) what options have been identified for disposal of each 

such type of radioactive waste; 

(3) what is known about the costs of, and timeframes 

for, each such option; 

(4) the benefits and challenges of each such option, 

according to the State of New York and the Department of 

Energy; and 

(5) as of the date of enactment of this Act— 

(A) how much has been spent on the disposal of radioactive waste associated with the demonstration project prescribed by section 2(a) of the West Valley Demonstration 

Project Act; and 

(B) what volumes and types of radioactive waste have 

been disposed of from the Western New York Service 

Center. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
I work for an insurance company and I am responsible for monitoring the federal and state law dichotomy with regard to cannabis.  My question is one seeking validation of what I believe to be the current situation -- my read of the current law framework is that while the 2018 Farm Bill has legalized hemp production/processing, the regulatory authority to implement that law resides with the USDA, which has not yet adopted any State plan for the production/processing of Hemp and the USDA is seeking input from stakeholders as part of their regulation-making process.  In the interim and for the 2019 planting season, States can continue operating under authorities of the 2014 Farm Bill, which allows States to implement a pilot program for the growth and cultivation of hemp.

Thus, what could be considered “legal” operations by an entity are those meeting the following 3 criteria, where the entity:  **(i)** is producing/processing hemp (which contains less than 0.3% THC level, as per 2018 Farm Bill); **(ii)** is domiciled and/or has its operations in a state allowing for a pilot program for hemp production under the 2014 Farm Bill; and **(iii)** has a license to grow, process hemp as granted under that pilot program.  **Does that analysis criteria seem proper?**

**Also – is there a resource that outlines which States have a pilot program for hemp under the 2014 Farm Bill?**

****

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter and I look forward to the Webinar.

Regards,

Mark Boone The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Co.
Record of Contacts

 FDMS Docket No. FAA-2011-1089

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Robert Farinas

(613) 952-4379

5/18/11 No Objections

Bombardier 

Aerospace

Robert Farinas 5/18/11 No Objections

Regional Airline

Association

Connie Arnold

202-367-1252

Arnold@raa.org

5/18/11 No Objections
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Sundaresan Raja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





/s/
                Sundaresan RajaSundaresan
                RajaPrincipal
                Executive Officer





March
      10,
      2008
Exhibit 31-1  CERTIFICATION I, Michael A. Lubin, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Lexington Precision Corporation;   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;   4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
           over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  April 23, 2009  /s/ Michael A. Lubin Michael A. Lubin Chairman of the Board (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0378

SAT Date: 4/16/2013

Print Date: 8/30/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 2 Anion2 1 2 Cation

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ; Anion moderate; Cation moderate

Keywords:

 Keywords: SEVER IRR/CORR-E,S,L,GI,MM

SENS-S,L
DEVEL

UNCERT NEUROAQUATOX-A,CSummary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0378

FATE: Estimations for typical anion, log Kow = -0.70 (E)log Koc = 1.00 (E)log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E)FATE: Estimations for cation log Kow = 1.38 (M)log Koc = 2.81 (E)log Fish BCF = 0.58 (E)log Fish BAF = 0.53 (E)PMN Substance: MP < 25 C (E)VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)H < 1.00E-8 (E)POTW removal (%) = Anion 90 via biodeg; Cation 0Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Anion wk; Cation moSorption to soils/sediments = Anion moderate; Cation moderatePBT Potential: Anion P1B1; Cation P2B1*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Anion moderate; Cation moderate

 Health: Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin, and good through the lung and GI trac

physical/chemical properties. There are concerns for severe irritation/possible corrosion to all exposed tissues anrespiratory sensitization, based on information in the PMN MSDS. There also is concern for developmental toxic
 and uncertain concern for neurotoxicity, based on 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured C

fish 96-h LC50 21.2

daphnid 48-h LC50 2.7

green algal 96-h EC50 1.9

fish 

_

chronic value 0.965

daphnid _ chronic value 0.244

algal _ chronic value 0.679

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _Sewage Sludge _ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for with molecular weight adjus

chemical class = log Kow = -4.5 (EPI), (EPI); unknown 

; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; 

mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern (ppb) 24

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat