alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Ronald L. Marsiglio, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of September 30, 2003 of Benthos, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 

 

4.    The small business issuer’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

a.    Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b.    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c.    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlsover financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially effected or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting: and 

 

5.    The small business issuer’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors: 

 

a.    All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.    Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Salvatore D’Auria, certify that:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/AAmendment No.2 of Tut Systems, Inc.;

 

2.                                       Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: September 2, 2004

* *
| * * | * * | *By:*    | */s/ Salvatore D’Auria*                                                                  |
|----------|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| * * | * * | * * | *Salvatore D’Auria,*                                                                     |
| * * | * * | * * | *President, Chief Executive Officer and  Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
        ACT OF 2002**
  Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
        Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
        the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
        certifies that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/
        Michael M. Schurer
 Michael
        M. Schurer
 Chief
        Financial Officer and Treasurer
 (Principal
        Financial and Accounting Officer)
 November
        4, 2005
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                 TOM BROWN, INC.

                           Subsidiaries of Registrant

                                December 31, 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Jurisdiction of            Percent
Name of Subsidiary                     Incorporation/Organization   of Ownership
------------------                     --------------------------   ------------
<S>                                   <C>                           <C>
Retex, Inc.                                   Wyoming                  100%
Rocno Corporation                             Texas                    100%
Wildhorse Energy Partners, L.L.C.             Delaware                  45%
Sauer Drilling Company                        Delaware                 100%
TBI West Virginia, Inc.                       Delaware                 100%
TBI Pipeline Company                          Delaware                 100%
TBI Resources, Ltd.                           Canadian                 100%
</TABLE>
No. 12-15-00082-CR

DAVID MARK DAVIS II,

Appellant,

VS

STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 IN THE TWELFTH 

 

 COURT OF APPEALS

 

 TYLER, TEXAS

APPELLANT’S SUPPLEMENT TO ORIGINAL DOCKETING STATEMENT

Appellant, David Mark Davis II, filed his initial docketing statement for the above styled case 

with this Court on April 1, 2015. At the time he filed said docketing statement, he did not know 

the name of the Court Reporter who will make the Reporter’s Record to be filed in this case. The 

Appellant has since become aware of the name of the Court Reporter and makes this supplement 

to his original docketing statement with this newly discovered information: 

 Court Reporter: Ms. Wendy Wilkerson 

 Appellant request the Honorable Clerk of this Court to supplement the case file with this new 

information as this will provide a more complete record for this appeal. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

David Mark Davis II 

Appellant, Pro Se 

ACCEPTED

12-15-00082-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

4/14/2015 10:29:33 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/14/2015 10:29:33 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that at the time of efiling this document, I served a copy of APPELLANT’S 

SUPPLEMENT TO ORIGINAL DOCKETING STATEMENT on the party listed below by 

electronic service, and the electronic transmission was reported as complete. 

My e-mail address is dmarkdavis2@gmail.com. 

1. Mr. Ed C. Jones 

Attorney for the State 

ejones@angelinacounty.net 

.

David Mark Davis II 

Defendant, Pro Se
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23 (a)

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of these Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-44475);
Form S-4 (No. 33-44403) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-36304, 33-67826, 33-67828 and
33-36305) of our report dated February 26, 1998 appearing on Page F2 of Bird
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.

/s/  Price Waterhouse LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 1998
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROYAL OILFIELD L.L.C.,

APPELLANT,

V.

LEWIS D. MARCELLUS,

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00304-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law

of Reeves County, Texas

APPELLEE.

§

(TC# 4187C)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
SERVED: JANUARY 27, 2011 

:R^RTfvlENTOF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ASPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS • : '''TtRATiONS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

•'M ,AN ->B A *^: 3 3 

IN THE MATTER OF 

POLAR AIR CARGO, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP07EA0006 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2007-27914 

ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

ESTABLISHING PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE 

On December 8, 2010, Claimant's Counsel submitted a letter stating that the parties agree 

to a proposed procedural schedule and that the parties agree to New York, New York, as the 

proposed hearing site.' Accordingly, 

. IT IS ORDERED THAT— 

1. The proposed dates contained in Complainant's Case Management Schedule are 

adopted for these proceedings; and 

2. Any hearing will be held in New York, New York, at a time and place to be set by 

a later order. 

SO ORDERED. 

)nnie A Jiroder 

Chief Administmive Lajst^udge 

The letter, received via facsimile by the Judge on December 8, 2010, is not accompanied by a Certificate 

of Service, but is signed by Complainant's Counsel, includes the notation "Telephone Facsimile and First-Class 

Mail," followed by the address of the Judge, and indicates that a carbon copy was sent to Respondent's Coimsel, 

whose name is followed by a fax number. The rules require filing by personal delivery or mailing to "to the 

appropriate address." 14 C.F.R. § 13.210(a). Parties must ensure that all submissions are properly filed with the 

Hearing Docket Clerk and serve a copy, with certificate of service, on the Judge. 
FAA Docket No. CP07EA0006 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000^ 

ONE COPY 

Paul A. Lange, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Offices of Paul A. Lange, LLC 

80 Ferry Boulevard 

Stratford, CT 06615-6079 

TEL: 203-375-7724 

FAX: 203-375-9397 

Christian L. Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Eastern Region 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3273 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El 2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, 

Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30. 

-2-
United States

Department of 

Agriculture

Agricultural 

Marketing 

Service

Fruit and 

Vegetable 

Programs

Fresh Products 

Branch

Grapes for Processing 

and Freezing

Inspection Instructions 

November 1981
April 1, 2015

STATE OF MINNESOTA 

IN SUPREME COURT 

A14-1930 

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against 

Timothy Christopher Scannell, a Minnesota Attorney, 

Registration No. 326525. 

ORDER 

fl 

O HU:IEOF 

AJIIIB.LAJECcurn 

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition 

for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Timothy Christopher Scannell has 

committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, committing 

two counts of fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct and making derogatory statements 

on his blog about criminal defendants that he was currently prosecuting, in violation of 

Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.6(a), 8.4(b), and 8.4(d). 

Respondent waived his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional 

Responsibility (RLPR), unconditionally admitted the allegations in the petition, and with 

the Director recommended that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension with 

no right to petition for reinstatement for 3 years. 

Following receipt of the parties' stipulation for discipline, we issued an order 

directing the parties to file memoranda of law showing cause why respondent should not 

be subject to more severe discipline. Only the Director filed a memorandum· in response 

to the order to show cause. 

1 
The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended 

disposition. 

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Respondent Timothy Christopher Scannell is indefmitely suspended from 

the practice of law, effective from the date of the filing of this order, with no right to 

petition for reinstatement for 3 years. 

2. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18(a)-(d), 

RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the professional 

responsibility portion of the state bar examination, satisfaction of continuing legal 

education requirements pursuant to Rule 18( e), RLPR, ·and proof of compliance with the 

terms of respondent's criminal probation. 

3. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of 

suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs 

pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR. 

Dated: April 1, 20 15 

BY THE COURT: 

Associate Justice 

GILDEA, C.J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. 

LILLEHAUG, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1250 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1250

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, as the ``Lucas Lowe 
                        Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LUCAS LOWE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lucas Lowe Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lucas Lowe 
Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1250

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, as the ``Lucas Lowe 
                        Memorial Post Office''.
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  Exhibit 23.1



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


       As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
       by reference of our report dated December 4, 1997, included in this Form
       10-K, into the Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. previously filed Form S-8
       Registration Statement File Nos. 33-38117, 33-41281, 33-53393 and 
       33-56583, Form S-3 Registration Statement File Nos. 33-58298 and 33-65055
       and Form S-4 Registration Statement File Nos. 33-52240 and 33-58889.






       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

       Houston, Texas
       December 4, 1997
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), I, Jack A. Cuneo, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1 The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ JACK A. CUNEOJack A. Cuneo President and Chief Executive Officer


November 14, 2007
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7505
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FRANK LEWIS BARBER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-92-88-S, CA-96-192-4) Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 13, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Danny Thomas Ferguson, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order granting in part and denying in part his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Appellant failed to raise his Fourth Amendment claim on direct appeal and he has not shown prejudice from his counsel's failure to raise the claim. See Whren v. United States , ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 4409 (U.S. June 10, 1996) (No. 95-5841); United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 167 (1982). Further, this Court willnot second-guess counsel's tactical decision regarding crossexamination of a Government witness. Goodson v. United States 564 F.2d 1071, 1072 (4th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Barber , Nos. CR-92-88-S; CA-96- 192-4 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
391 A.2d 690

#### Commonwealth v. Loncosky, Appellant.

Submitted March 20,1978.

Richard Hale Pratt, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Kenneth G. Biehn, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

HOFFMAN, J.,

dissented and would grant a new trial because the lower court erred in refusing to charge that character evidence alone could create a reasonable doubt. *Commonwealth v. Goodman,*182 Pa.Sup.Ct. 205, 126 A.2d 763 (1956).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
12/31/98 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      14,964,000
<SECURITIES>                                19,626,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,051,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          63,399
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,886
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,151,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  82,453,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,886,000
<SALES>                                      6,888,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,052,000
<CGS>                                        5,437,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,437,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,744,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             868,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,003,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,878,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,228,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,228,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.32
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT** 

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer ofNew Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1,2023 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC andCNH Equipment Trust 2023-B, does hereby certify that:

 

1.            NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.            The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate tothe Indenture Trustee.

 

3.            This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.            A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2023 and of its performanceunder the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementin all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2023.

 

6.            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 27th day of March, 2024.

 

 

 

 

March 27, 2024