alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Why Industrial Hemp? 

1. U.S Agriculture accounts for only 1.05 of the GDP. 

2. In 2012 there were 3.2 M farmers and it went down to 2.06 M. in 2016. 

3. 75% of total Agricultural production is by Large Family Farms and 25% 

by small farms. 

4. 758,000 farms workers were legally employed in 2017. 

5. Only 2% of U.S. population are farmers. 

Observations: 

1. The U.S. Agriculture is decaying each year because new generations of 

farmers do not like the hard work which entails about 80% of weeding 

and working the land. 

2. U.S. Agriculture is on life support and depending on legal or illegal farm 

workers from Latin America. 

3. Large Family Farms receive billions of dollars in subsidies each year. 

Recommendations for considering Industrial & Commercial Hemp 

production: 

1. The U.S. GDP will jump to 10% in a 10-year period. 

2. By 2030 there will be at least 3.2 M farmers back to 2012 level. 

3. 50% of U.S. Agricultural production will be by small farms. 

4. There will be about 3M new U.S. farm jobs 

5. Small farmers will be able to grow hemp feed for their own livestock and 

for themselves. 

6. Hemp wood and hempcrete for residential and commercial construction 

will create about 5 million new jobs over a 10-year period. 

7. Americans will be able to consume homegrown hemp for their diets and 

health regimens. 

8. U.S. will be able to export hemp products instead of importing over 

750M each year. 

Adopting Industrial Hemp for U.S. Agriculture is the SMART thing to do. 

Dr. Manlio V. Mendoza, Ph.D., USAF (Ret.) 

CEO, Super Natural Organic Farms of America 

www.snofa.net ceo@snofa.net 504-913-3971
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING 

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND 

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE.

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT 

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S 

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT 

USDA, AMS, FVP, SCI

831 MITTEN ROAD, ROOM 200

BURLINGAME, CA 94010

PHONE: 650-552-9073

FAX: 650-552-9147

EQUIPMENT CATALOG


Rusty Brown Discoloration 

The photographs below illustrate Rusty Brown Discoloration which occurs in lettuce marketed during The disease is apparently a physiological disorder which originates in the field, but what factor or facto develop are not known. 

Rusty 

May 1990 (Previou
RUSTY BROWN DISCOLORATION shall be considered on the basis of whether it seriou

shipping quality (marketing quality) of the head exclusive of the wrapper leaves. 

THIS PHOTOGRAPH ILLUSTRATES THE MAXIMUM EXTENT TO WHICH A HEAD MAY B

RUSTY BROWN DISCOLORATION IN ANY U.S. GRADE. A HEAD SHALL BE SCORED A

DAMAGED WHEN THIS TYPE OF DISCOLORATION ON HEAD LEAVES AGGREGATES 

AMOUNT AND DEGREE SHOWN.

Example of certifricate statement under “Condition”Head Leaves: From 1 to 4 heads per carton 

 average 12% serious damage  by Rusty Brown Discoloration 

 affecting midribs and veins 

Rusty 

May 1990 (Previou
Discoloration Following Bruising

Discoloration following brusing shall be scored as damage or serious damage respecti

or seriously detracting from the appearance of more than 2 outer head leaves. This photograph illustrates discoloration following bruisng which materially detracts frof one outer head leaf. 

“Damage”When three outer head leaves are 

affected by discoloration following bruising to the extent shown in this photograph the head is 

damaged. 

“Serious DamWhen three oaffected by dibruising to an 

amount and/othis photogra

seriously dam

Discoloratio

March 1990 (prev
“Brown Stain”

The photographs below illustrate Brown Stain, a new lettuce discorder. This condition oval to irregular necrotic area 1⁄4 to 1⁄2 inch in diameter but sometimes larger, particularl

coalesce. Affected areas are generally on the outer surface of the head leaves, on or n

usually extend toward the basal half of the leaf. These areas may be slightly sunken, cstraw to brown, and margins are sometimes dark and mottled. 

May 1990 (Previously 
Brown Stain shall be scored as damage or serious damage respectively when materiall

detractin

g from the appearance, or the edible or shipping quality (marketing quality) of 

of the wrapper leaves. THIS PHOTOGRAPH ILLUSTRATES T

HE MAXIMUM EXTENT

TO WHICH A HEAD MAY BE AFFECTED BY BROW

N STAIN IN 

THE U.S. NO. 1 GRADE. A HEAD SHALL BE SCORED AS DAMAGED WHEN T

HIS TYPE OF DISCOLORATION ON HEAD

LEAVS AGGREGATE

S MORE THAN THE AMOUNT AND 

DEGREE SHOWN. 

THIS PHOTOGRAPH ILLUSTRATES TTO WHICH A HEAD MAY BE AFFECT

THE U.S. NO. 2 GRADE. A HEAD SHA

SERIOUSLY DAMAGED WHEN THIS TDISCOLORATION ON HEAD LEAVES 

THAN T

H

E AMOUNT AND DEGREE S

Example of certificate statement under “Condition”Head leaves: From 1 to 5 heads per carton, average 10

%

 Damage by Brown Stain. 

May 1990 (Previously
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aventura Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig A. Waltzer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                                                
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|November 15, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Craig A. Waltzer                           
|                  |  |     |  | Craig A. Waltzer                               
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

End of Filing
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000422

13-APR-2015

09:03 AM
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6455

SHAWNDELL MONTE MCFARLIN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SCOTT S. HARRIS , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Cameron McGowan Currie , Senior District Judge. ( 2:18

- cv
- 03198

- CMC )

Submitted : August 2 2 , 2019 Decided: August 26, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Shawndell Monte McFarlin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Shawndell Monte McF arlin appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing McFarlin’s complaint

. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012) . The magistrate jud ge recommended th at the complaint be dismissed and advised
McFarlin that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985).
McFarlin has waived appellate review by failing to file timely objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly , we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1133 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities relating to 

the collective bargaining of employees in the Veterans Health Administration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. TAKANO (for himself, Mr. COOPER, Mr. POCAN, Mr. TONKO, Mr. 

KHANNA, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Ms. NORTON, 

Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. RUSH, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Miss RICE of New York, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, 

Ms. HILL of California, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. CISNEROS, Mr. GOMEZ, Mr. 

RASKIN, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire, 

Ms. ESHOO, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. JAYAPAL, and Mr. 

CARBAJAL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities 

relating to the collective bargaining of employees in the 

Veterans Health Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Employee Fairness 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1133 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON COLLECTIVE 

2 BARGAINING OF EMPLOYEES OF THE VET3 ERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. 

4 Section 7422 of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d); and 

7 (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as sub8 section (b). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Maddox
Ungar Silberstein, PLLCCPAs and Business
Advisors


Phone
(248) 203-0080


Fax (248)
281-0940


30600
Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham
Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.maddoxungar.com





March 30,
2009








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of
Directors


Secured
Diversified Investment, Ltd.


Las
Vegas, Nevada





To Whom
It May Concern:





Maddox
Ungar Silberstein, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K,Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by Secured Diversified
Investment, Ltd. of our report dated February 12, 2009, relating to the
financial statements of Galaxy Gaming, Inc. Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as of
and for the periods ending December 31, 2008 and 2007.





Sincerely,





/s/ Maddox Ungar
Silberstein, PLLC


Maddox
Ungar Silberstein, PLLC
dU.IMS -oj 0.2.103

Alejandro Ledesma, Jr.

TDCJ-CID #1134797

French M. Robertson Unit

12071 FM 3522

Abilene, Texas 79601-8749

(325)548-9035

April 5, 2015

Hon. Abel Acosta, Cleric

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

P.O. Box 12308

Austin, Texas 78711-2308

(512)463-1551

www.cca.courts.state.tx.us

RE: STATE V. LEDESMA, Cause No. 2000D04485 (41st Jud. Dlst. Ct. El Paso Co.Tx)

Dear Clerk,

Would you please let me know whether or not an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 Code of Criminal Procedures has ever

been filed in the above-listed case? If so, would you then please send me a

true copy of your official DOCKET so I can see the dates when it was filed and

its final disposition.

If anything further is required from myself, please let me know.

Thank you for your time and assistance.

Sincerely,

l^vAA^r7" fALJ/rjr

COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 08 2.T3

Ab@l Acosta, Clerk
EXHIBIT 10.9



PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   Ministry of Energy Mines and Petroleum Resources


RECORD OF 2 POST CLAIM - MINERAL TENURE ACT

(Section 27)



	
____________________________________
	
391990______________________________

	
Mining Division
	
Tenure No.

	
____________________________________
	
____________________________________

	
Gold Commissioner
	
Date of Record




_____________________________________________________________________________________



APPLICATION TO RECORD A 2 POST CLAIM



I, Stephen Kenwood, Name of Locator, 2073 149th Street, Surrey, British Columbia, V4A 8C4, (604) 535-8146, Client No. 134185, Agent for Paul Reynolds, 4035 W. 31st Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6S 1Y7, Client No. 122617, hereby apply for record of a 2 Post Claim for the location as outlined on the attached copy of mineral titles reference map No. 082L2E, in the Vernon Mining Division.



ACCESS



Describe how you gained access to the location, include reference to roads, trails, topographic features, permanent landmarks and a description of the legal post location.



Access to location gained by traveling east of Vernon on Highway 6 15 km. past Cherryville to Monashee Creek.  The Initial Post is approximately 2.1 km. further south along Highway 6 from Monashee Creek and about 30 metres east of Highway 6.



TAG INFORMATION



I have affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "INITIAL POST" (No. 1) to the initial post and impressed this information on the tag:



TAG NUMBER 706071 M  INITIAL POST (No. 1)



	
CLAIM NAME
	
WYATT 7

	
LOCATOR
	
Stephen Kenwood

	
AGENT FOR
	
Paul Reynolds

	
DATE COMMENCED
	
February 8, 2002

	
TIME COMMENCED
	
12:15

	
DIR. TO F.P.
	
015

	
METRES TO RIGHT
	
500

	
METRES TO LEFT
	
0






"Direction" means a bearing measured between 0 degrees and 360 degrees, where 0 degrees is the bearing of true north.    time is p.m.



I have securely affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "FINAL POST (No. 2)" to the final post (or the witness post) and impressed this information on the tag:

	
CLAIM NAME
	
WYATT 7

	
LOCATOR
	
Stephen Kenwood

	
AGENT FOR
	
Paul Reynolds

	
DIST. FROM I.P.
	
500 metres

	
DATE COMPLETED
	
February 8, 2002

	
TIME COMPLETED
	
1:30






If a witness post was placed for final post:  Bearing and distance from witness post to the true position of the final corner post, exactly as written on the witness post:  _________ degrees, _________ metres.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT



I have complied with all of the terms and conditions of the Mineral Tenure Act and Regulations pertaining to the location of the 2 post claims and have attached a plan of the location on which the positions of the initial and final post (and witness post, if applicable) are indicated.  The tag information supplied above is the identical information that I impressed upon the respective tags affixed to the applicable post when I located this claim, and the information is true and correct.


/s/  "Stephen Kenwood"

Stephen Kenwood

Signature of Locator



SEAL



RECEIVED

SUB-RECORDER

VANCOUVER, BC

FEB. 28, 2002

Recording Stamp
Exhibit 10(a)  


April 19, 2002 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life Insurance Company

2801 Highway 201 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 


Directors:



        We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 5 to
the registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-60149) filed by Protective Life Insurance Company and Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 













Sincerely,

SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

By: /s/  DAVID S. GOLDSTEIN     








David S. Goldstein
DANIEL SMITH, ESQ. 64 Main Street P.O. Box 801 

Montpelier, VT 05601 

(802) 229-6661 phone dsmith@dairycompact.org email

Mr. Paul Kyburz July 13, 2012 

Federal Order # 30 Market Administrator 

4570 West 77th Street, Suite 210 

Minneapolis, MN 55435-5037 

Dear Mr. Kyburz. 

I am writing to follow up on my letter of November 29, 2011. Your office kindly 

provided the data requested in that letter, for one month. I would now like to request that 

the same data be provided for each of the two months, annually (I believe May and 

December), that the data is assembled by your office, for the four-year span 2008-2011. 

This would give us a total eight month sampling. 

Thank you for your consideration of this request. 

Sincerely, 

Daniel Smith, Esq. 

on behalf of MDIA 

cc (email) Dana Coale 

 Will Francis 

 Paul Christ
Manufactured Home Shipments Most Recent 12 Months (August 2013 through July 2014)

State Single Wides Multi Wides Total Floors

AL 1092 1346 2438 3820

FL 971 2452 3423 5944

GA 451 1026 1477 2511

HI 0 3 3 7

LA 2628 1614 4242 5921

MS 1189 1302 2491 3835

SC 848 1247 2095 3357

TX 7707 5840 13547 19450

AR 619 811 1430 2253

AZ 304 832 1136 1998

CA 293 2,142 2,435 4,716

KS 183 191 374 568

KY 920 1,305 2,225 3,537

MO 413 468 881 1,349

NC 1,269 1,327 2,596 3,927

NM 482 587 1,069 1,666

OK 809 832 1,641 2,478

TN 751 1,213 1,964 3,183

AK 37 4 41 45

CO 561 279 840 1,120

CT 53 41 94 135

DE 110 195 305 505

IA 217 105 322 427

ID 86 209 295 525

IL 534 340 874 1,219

IN 640 282 922 1,204

MA 60 89 149 240

MD 149 84 233 317

ME 177 180 357 536

MI 1,030 695 1,725 2,420

MN 219 181 400 582

MT 252 162 414 585

ND 412 363 775 1,149

NE 74 50 124 174

NH 102 183 285 466

NJ 101 114 215 329

NV 48 178 226 419

NY 576 800 1,376 2,178

OH 550 442 992 1,434

OR 193 644 837 1,538

PA 515 769 1,284 2,056

RI 3 4 7 11

SD 264 165 429 595

UT 39 150 189 345

Page 1 of 2
Manufactured Home Shipments Most Recent 12 Months (August 2013 through July 2014)

VA 514 562 1,076 1,639

VT 67 71 138 209

WA 83 603 686 1,371

WI 156 108 264 372

WV 359 730 1,089 1,820

WY 139 79 218 295

Canada 1 0 1 1

Destination Pending 126 101 227 330

Grand Total 29,376 33,500 62,876 97,111

Note that this data represents state of first destination and may not be final state of

installation and occupancy.

Page 2 of 2
iOTiON DENIED

DATE: ^JfL y^ BY: 715 — RECEIVED IN

1(jMj3t)^

^fi&rfl £#/#<?r l&t/etz:

__60UKT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

^.(At-fattf**^^

^%0&;ZjL Xff^O&te&A*^'
<£*£>

oSs*^vv\3*-i &&U&&—

LMZ

*## ^a4*J&<n.

^_/
A/* u)'£-K,*?0-06

P-&&4.

P"&*»*ff'Z%#P. £^ fa/r p_Ua

/,£./?./? fl>Pc£ $^7'Jl^O^k^£&UiM$<z

#^'.flfe^^~z&* c^zsJbi. jJott&^ky<?z*L

£<P&/5£?tPPi&. Qm^3
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0001388

15-APR-2015

11:09 AM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7880

ALAN L. MEADOWS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LIEUTENANT RAYNOR; MR. HARRIS, Unit Manager;

HINNIAN, Sgt.; HOLLINGSWORTH, Sgt.; MOYLE,

C/O,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (CA-03-506-BO)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 16, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan L. Meadows, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Alan L. Meadows appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Meadows v. Raynor, No. CA-03-506-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In re Habeas Corpus of Johnny Lee SANDERS.

No. H-77-587.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Aug. 19, 1977.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Johnny Lee Sanders, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, has filed an application for habeas corpus in this Court, seeking release from confinement under an Order of the Chief Executive revoking his parole.

Petitioner asserts that the proceedings conducted by the Department of Corrections and the Executive Hearing conducted by the Governor’s Office, did not comply with the requirements of due process of law as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma. Proceedings to challenge the validity of the revocation of a parole are governed by the provisions of 22 O.S.1971, § 1080 and 22 O.S.1971, § 1081. The pertinent part of 22 O.S.1971, § 1080, provides:

> “Any person who has been convicted of, or sentenced for, a crime and who claims:

> * * 3⁄8 # * #

> “(e) that his sentence has expired, his suspended sentence, probation, *parole, or conditional release unlawfully revoked,*or he is otherwise unlawfully held in custody or other restraint; or

> 1⁄8 * $ * $ *

> “may institute a proceeding under this act in the court in which the judgment and sentence on conviction was imposed to secure the appropriate relief. Excluding a timely appeal, this act encompasses and replaces all common law and statutory methods of challenging a conviction or sentence.” (Emphasis added]

The pertinent part of 22 O.S.1971, § 1081, provides:

> “A proceeding is commenced by filing a verified ‘application for post-conviction relief with the clerk of the court imposing judgment if an appeal is not pending. *When such a proceeding arises from the revocation of parole or conditional release, the proceeding shall be commenced by filing a verified ‘application for post-conviction relief’ with the Clerk of the District Court in the county in which the parole or conditional release was revoked.*Facts within the personal knowledge of the applicant and the authenticity of all documents and exhibits included in or attached to the application must be sworn to affirmatively as true and correct. * * [Emphasis added]

The application for habeas corpus, on its face, discloses that Petitioner has not followed the proceedings provided by law for challenging the validity of the revocation of his parole. We accordingly dismiss the application for habeas corpus and direct the Petitioner’s attention to the statutes above set forth. If, after instituting the post-conviction proceedings as set forth above, Petitioner is denied his application for post-conviction relief, he must appeal from said order in the manner provided by *332law or he will have been deemed to have waived his right to challenge said revocation.

For the above and foregoing reasons the application for habeas corpus is *DISMISSED.*

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WITNESS OUR HANDS, and the Seal of this Court, this 19th day of August, 1977.

(s) HEZ J. BUSSEY__ HEZ J. BUSSEY, PRESIDING JUDGE

(s) TOM BRETT_ TOM BRETT, JUDGE
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHEL CHATMAN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 484

[ July 29, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Mindy F. Solomon , Judge; L.T. Case No.

16002652CF10A

.

Hilliard E. Moldof of Hillard E. Moldof, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, G ERBER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.