alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

 NATIONAL WEEKLY FED CATTLE COMPREHENSIVE REPORT Jul 2017 

The National Weekly Fed Cattle Comprehensive report is released on a weekly basis, at 2:00 p.m. Central 

Time the second reporting day of the week under the National Weekly Fed Cattle Comprehensive link. 

The entire report covers transactions from the previous Monday afternoon through the current Monday 

morning (unless otherwise noted) including domestic and imported cattle through the Livestock 

Mandatory Reporting Act. The fed cattle comprehensive report can be divided into 5 major sections; (1) 

weighted averages (2) spread comparisons (3) grading averages (4) formula volumes (5) purchasing 

volumes. 

(1) WEIGHTED AVERAGE SECTION

 Includes weekly Negotiated, Formula Nets, Forward Contract Nets and Negotiated Grid Nets 

purchase types of beef type and dairy bred cattle.

 Separated into Dressed and Live purchase basis with greater than 65% Choice, less than 65% 

Choice and Total all Grades data. Provides current, week ago and year ago price data.

 All prices are quoted in U.S. dollars per 100 pounds (cwt).

(2) SPREAD COMPARISON

 Beef Type/ Dairy Type Spread

 Difference between beef type compared to dairy bred cattle. Example is shown above with beef 

type price of $190.51 minus dairy bred price of $175.89 equals $14.62.

 Provides price spreads for current, week ago and year ago data.
2

52 Week Rolling Average

 Difference between the 52 week rolling average (Formula Net, Formula Base and Negotiated) 

starting from year ago Monday afternoon data to the current Monday morning data. 

 All live transactions are converted to dressed prices off of reported dressing percentage.

(3) GRADING AVERAGES

 Provides the average weekly percent choice from Formula Net, Contract Net and Negotiated 

Grid Net purchase types.

 Includes only beef type cattle.

 All live transactions are converted to dressed weight off of actual dressing percentage.

 Displays current and previous week data.

(4) FORMULA VOLUMES

 Displays the total daily formula base volumes for the previous 5 days, from the previous Tuesday 

to the current Monday.

 Includes all fed cattle class codes. Steers, Heifers, Mixed Steers/Heifers, Dairybred 

Steers/Heifers and Mixed Steer/Heifer/Cow.
3

(5) PURCHASING VOLUMES

Purchase Type Breakdown

 Summarizes the total weekly purchase type breakdown in a pie chart format along with a

previous year line chart.

 Shows the weekly percentage of total purchases of Negotiated, Formula Net, Forward Contract 

Net and Negotiated Grid Net transactions. 

Delivery Period Breakdown

 Illustrates the weekly volume of domestic and imported negotiated purchases in 1-14 and 15-30 

day delivery. 

 Shows the weekly volumes for the previous year in line chart form.
# L_2012112EN.01002101.xml

| 24.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

ACT

ACT

concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community

PART FOUR

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TEMPORARY PROVISIONS

TITLE IV

OTHER PROVISIONS

OTHER PROVISIONS

Article 39

If there are serious shortcomings or any imminent risk of such shortcomings in Croatia in the transposition or state of implementation of acts adopted by the institutions pursuant to Part Three, Title V of the TFEU as well as of acts adopted by the institutions before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon pursuant to Title VI of the TEU or pursuant to Part Three, Title IV of the Treaty establishing the European Community, the Commission may, until the end of a period of up to three years after accession, upon the reasoned request of a Member State or on its own initiative and after consulting the Member States, adopt appropriate measures and specify the conditions and arrangements applicable thereto.

These measures may take the form of a temporary suspension of the application of relevant provisions and decisions in the relations between Croatia and any other Member State or Member States, without prejudice to the continuation of close judicial cooperation. The safeguard clause may be invoked even before accession on the basis of the monitoring findings and the measures adopted shall enter into force on the date of accession unless they provide for a later date. The measures shall be maintained no longer than strictly necessary and, in any case, shall be lifted when the shortcomings are remedied. They may, however, be applied beyond the period referred to in the first paragraph as long as these shortcomings persist. In response to progress made by Croatia in rectifying the identified shortcomings, the Commission may adapt the measures as appropriate after consulting the Member States. The Commission shall inform the Council in good time before revoking the safeguard measures, and it shall take duly into account any observations of the Council in this respect.

---
PD- 

 

MAHMOUD AFHAMI X IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

 X 

 X

VS. X 

X

X

THE STATE OF TEXAS X OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

COMES NOW, MAHMOUD AFHAMI, Appellant, and moves for an

extension of thirty (30) days in which to file his Petition for Discretionary Review, 

until and including May 18, 2015, and would further show as follows:

A. On March 17, 2015, in cause number 14-13-01013-CR, styled “Mahmoud 

Afhami vs. The State of Texas,” the Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the 

Appellant’s conviction for terroristic threat against a member of Appellant’s 

family. No motion for rehearing was filed.

B. The deadline for filing the Petition for Discretionary Review in this cause is 

currently Thursday, April 16, 2015.

C. A request is hereby made for an extension of time to file the Appellant’s Brief, 

until and including Monday, May 18, 2015.

D. The undersigned attorney, Bob Wicoff, has been unusually busy with other 

matters which have kept him from completing the PDR by the current 

deadline, including, but not limited to, the following:

PD-0399-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/7/2015 1:35:20 PM

Accepted 4/15/2015 10:51:09 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
FEANYICHI UVUKANSI VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS; No. 01-14-00527-

CR; Appellant’s brief filed on March 9, 2015 (capital murder);

GRISELDA AZA VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS; Nos. 14-14-00241-CR and 

14-14-00242-CR; Appellant’s brief filed March 11, 2015;

RICHARD SCOTT VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS; No. 14-14-00726-CR; 

Appellant’s brief filed March 18, 2015;

NORMA SANCHEZ VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS; No. 14-14-00780-CR; 

Appellant’s brief filed March 19, 2015;

JAMIE IBARRA VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS; No. 14-13-00337-CR; 

Appellant’s PDR filed on April 1, 2015;

Additionally, the undersigned serves on the Texas Forensic Science 

Commission Hair Microscopy Panel, as part of a team reviewing hundreds of cases 

involving possible errors in expert testimony.

D. No previous extensions have been requested. If this extension request is 

granted, no further extensions are expected to be needed. 

Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County Texas 

/s/ Bob Wicoff__________

BOB WICOFF

1201 Franklin, Thirteenth Floor

Houston Texas 77002

(713) 274-6781

TBA No. 21422700

Bob.wicoff@pdo.hctx.net
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true copy of this motion has been served electronically on the Harris County 

District Attorney’s Office Appellate Division on the 7th day of April, 2015. 

/s/_Bob Wicoff_________

BOB WICOFF
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001061312
<NAME> GOTHIC PRODUCTION CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,879
<PP&E>                                         275,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (28,441)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,528
<BONDS>                                        298,943
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     34,892
<COMMON>                                           162
<OTHER-SE>                                     (71,141)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,026
<SALES>                                         39,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,648
<CGS>                                           31,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                34,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (50,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (50,406)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (31,459)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (81,865)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (5.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.57)
        

</TABLE>
FORMAL RECOMMENDATION BY THE

NATIONAL ORGANIC STANDARDS BOARD (NOSB) 

TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIC PROGRAM (NOP) 

Date: _____6-3-06___________________

Subject: Sunset Review - 205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop 

production 

Chair: Kevin O’Rell 

Recommendation

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action: _XXXXXX_ 

Guidance Statement: ________ 

Other: ________ 

Statement of the Recommendation (including Recount of Vote):

See attached Recommendation for Renewal of Horticultural Oils as Synthetic substances allowed 

for use in organic crop production on 205.601, category use (e) as insecticides and (i) as plant 

disease control. 

NOSB Vote: 

Moved: Gerald Davis Second: Nancy Ostiguy 

Yes – 9 

No – 3 

Abstain – 0 

Absent – 2 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with OFPA and NOP):

NOSB Sunset Material Vote 

Response by the NOP:
NOSB- Crops Committee 

Horticultural Oils- Sunset Recommendation 

Final NOSB Recommendation 4/20/2006 

I. List: 205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production 

II. Category Use 

 (e): As insecticides 

 (i): As plant disease control 

III. Committee Summary: Pertaining to oils (horticultural), comments were received 

saying that natural alternatives were available as replacements. Vegetable oils were 

mentioned as the natural product replacement, but were questioned to see if these are 

appropriate and effective. According to a representative of one California organic 

certifier, all the vegetable oil formulations for crop protection use have synthetic 

emulsifiers in them. Without the emulsifier, the oils would not work as a spray 

material for crops. It could be argued that these products would not be wholly natural 

substitutes. Further comments were received stating that multi-year grower comparative 

tests between vegetable oil products and the petroleum derived oils showed that the 

vegetable oils did not control certain target pests adequately. Research data that could 

verify the claim that the vegetable oil alternatives are truly adequate as a replacement is 

needed. 

IV. Committee Recommendation: 

Recommendations based upon comments received- 205.601(e) and (i) 

The Crops Committee recommends the renewal of the following material in these 

categories of use: 

(e) As insecticides (including acaricides or mite control). 

(6) Oils, horticultural- narrow range oils as dormant, suffocating, and summer oils. 

(i) As plant disease control. 

(6) Oils, horticultural- narrow range oils as dormant, suffocating, summer oils. 

Moved:Rigoberto Delgado Second: Jeff Moyer 

Committee vote: 3-1 Absent: Ostiguy 

NOSB Vote: 

Moved: Gerald Davis Second: Nancy Ostiguy 

Yes – 9 

No – 3 

Abstain – 0 

Absent – 2
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0886 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2008 - SW - 067 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                        722,502
<SECURITIES>                  257,459 <F1> 
<RECEIVABLES>                 360,206
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        13,451,630 <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                965,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                14,043,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         92,051
<BONDS>                       698,920 <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      13,252,905 <F4>
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  14,043,876
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              468,626 <F5>
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 119,064 <F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              11,492 <F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  338,070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
<FN>
<F1>   "SECURITIES" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE
<F2>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
          BUILDING]
<F3>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MINORITY INTEREST IN JOINT VENTURE
<F4>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F5>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
          INCOME
<F6>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES
<F7>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS MINORITY AND EQUITY INTEREST
          IN JOINT VENTURES' NET INCOME
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Order entered May 1 7 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 11
- 00279
- CV
YVONNE BROWN, Appellant
V. FALLS ON CLEARWOOD, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 10
- 07137
- A 

### O RDER
T he supplemental clerk’s record, if any, in this case is overdue. By order dated January 10, 2103, we ordered the Dallas County Clerk to file, within ten days, a supplemental clerk’s record containing all papers from the Justice Cou rt filed with the County Court in this case. To date, the supplemental clerk’s record has not been filed. Nor have we received any correspondence from the County Clerk regarding the status of the supplemental clerk’s record. This appeal cannot proceed u ntil the issue of the supplemental clerk’s record is resolved. Therefore, the Dallas County Clerk is ORDERED to file, within FIVE DAYS , either (1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing all papers from the Justice Court filed with the County Court in this case; or (2) writ ten verification that no such papers were filed in this case.Appellant’s brief in this case is due within THIRTY DAYS of the filing of the supplemental clerk’s record or written verification that the requested records have not been filed in this case. We CAUTION appellant that no extensions will be granted and that failure to timely file a brief in this case will result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8; 42.3.
We DIRECT the Clerk of t he Court to send a copy of this order, by electronic transmission, to all parties and to:

John F. Warren Dallas County Clerk Records Building, 2 nd Floor 509 Main St., Suite 200 Dallas, TX 75202
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03- 08 -00 439 -CR

Lar r y J ohns on , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 427TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-07 -20 4693 , HO NORAB LE MELI SSA YO UNG G OO DWI N , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Ap pe lla nt L arr y John so n w a s c on vic te d b y the tr ia l c ourt

of a tte mpt e d s e xua l a ssa

ult , enhanc ed by three prior convictions, and was sentenc ed to fiftee n y ear s’ i mprisonment. Appellant’s appointed attorne y

has filed a

brief c oncluding that the appe al is frivolous and without merit. Counsel’s brief me ets the re quirements ofAn de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by pr e se nti ng a pr of

e ssi on a l eva luatio n o f t

he re c or d a

nd de mon str a tin g that th e re are no argua ble g rounds to be adva

nced. Se e Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 7 5, 80 (1 98 8) ; An de rs , 386 U.S. at 743-44; Hi gh v . S tat e , 573 S.W. 2d 80 7, 81 1- 13 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tat e , 516 S.W .2d 684, 68 4 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 74 ); Ga ino us v . S tat e , 436 S.W .2d 137, 138 (Tex. C ri m . Ap p . 1 969). Ap pe lla nt’ s atto rn e y

se nt a pp e lla nt a c op y of the br ie f a

nd adv is ed hi m tha t he ha d th e ri g ht t o examine the rec ord and f ile a pro se brief. S

e e A n d e rs , 38 6 U .S. a t 74 4; J

ac k so n v . S tat e , 485 S.W .2d 553, 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972). No pro se br ief ha s been f iled.No substitut e counsel will be appointed. Should appe llant w ish to seek f urther r eview of 1 his case by

the cour t of criminal appe als, he must either r etain an at t o rn ey t o fi l e a petition for discretionar

y revie w or file a pro se petition for discretionary revie w. See ge nerally Tex. R. App. P. 68-79 (g overningproce eding s in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals). An y p et i t ion for dis c re tio na

ry re vie w mus t be fi le d with in t hir ty da y s f ro m th e date of

e ith e r t his op ini on

or the date this Court overrules the last ti m ely motion for rehe aringfiled. See Tex. R. App. P . 68.2. The petition must be filed with this Court, a fter which it will be forwa rded to the court of c ri m inal appea ls a long with the rest of the filings in the c ause. See Tex. R. App. P . 68.3, 68.7. Any petition for discr etionary

revie w should comply

with rules 68.4 and 68.5 of the rules of

appellate proce dure. See Tex. R. App. P . 68.4, 68.5. 2

We h a ve c on sid e re d th e re c or d a nd c ouns e l’ s brie f a

nd a g re e that th e a

pp e a l is frivolous and without merit. We have r eviewe d the evidenc e pre sented to the jur y and the pr oc e dure s th a t w e re ob se rv e d a nd fi nd no thi ng in the re c or d tha t mig ht a rgua bly su pp or t th e a pp e a l. We gr ant counse l’s motion to wit hdrawand af firm the judg ment of convic tion. 1

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and He nson Affir med Filed: Apr il 8, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Plant Variety Protection Office (PVPO) E-News, Issue 6 - July 2018

This newsletter provides updates about the PVPO team, helpful Plant Variety Protection (PVP) tips, and 

other valuable information that we are certain you will find useful. 

The PVPO has launched a new system that can be used to make fee payments. The current methods of 

making payments by check and credit card will still be honored, but the new form available from 

www.pay.gov is a great way to make and manage payments to the PVPO for applications and services.

The image below is a snapshot of the system available to any PVPO customers and the public to make 

payments for services. This system can be used without accessing the electronic Plant Variety 

Protection (ePVP) System to make payments.
If you are interested in using the ePVP System to submit your application for Plant Variety Protection, it 

can be accessed here: https://pvpo.ams.usda.gov/. Fee payments can also be made from the ePVP 

System.

To subscribe to updates, change your profile, or unsubscribe to this newsletter, go to 

https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDAMS.

We welcome your suggestions on topics for future newsletters, as well as ideas on how we can improve 

our service. Please feel free to contact the PVPO if you have any questions, comments or suggestions.

The USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

For more information, please contact:

Plant Variety Protection Office

Science & Technology Program

Agricultural Marketing Service

United States Department of Agriculture

1400 Independence Ave, SW - Room 4512

Washington, DC 20250

Phone: (202) 260-8983

PVPOmail@ams.usda.gov
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott Spangenberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Tut Systems Inc., on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tut Systems, Inc.



By:

/s/ Scott SpangenbergScott Spangenberg Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


Date: August 21, 2006