Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Notices 23659 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 76 

FR 5563 (Feb. 1, 2011) (Initiation Notice). 2See Certain Orange Juice From Brazil, 77 FR 

22343 (Apr. 13, 2012) (ITC Final). 

3See Antidumping Duty Order; Frozen 

Concentrated Orange Juice From Brazil, 52 FR 

16426 (May 5, 1987). 

4The Department preliminarily found that Louis 

Dreyfus Commodities Agroindustrial S.A. (Louis 

Dreyfus) is the successor-in-interest to Coinbra 

Frutesp (SA). See Certain Orange Juice From Brazil: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary No 

Shipment Determination, 77 FR 21724 (Apr. 11, 

2012). 

5See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Orange 

Juice from Brazil, 71 FR 12183 (Mar. 9, 2006). 6See Certain Orange Juice From Brazil: Final 

Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30655 (May 26, 

2011). 7See ITC Final and USITC Publication 4311 

(April 2012), titled Certain Orange Juice from Brazil 

(Inv. No. 731–TA–1089). 

California Highway Patrol must approve 

all mixed-use designations. 

Scoping Process 

This notice of intent initiates the 

scoping process, which guides the 

development of the environmental 

impact statement. A public meeting will 

be held in Crescent City on May 9, 2012 

to discuss the proposed action, and 

answer any questions the public may 

have regarding the project. It is 

important that reviewers provide their 

comments at such times and in such 

manner that they are useful to the 

agency’s preparation of the 

environmental impact statement. 

Therefore, comments should be 

provided prior to the close of the 

comment period and should clearly 

articulate the reviewer’s concerns and 

contentions. Comments received in 

response to this solicitation, including 

names and addresses of those who 

comment, will be part of the public 

record for this proposed action. 

Dated: April 2, 2012. 

Tyrone Kelley, 

Forest Supervisor. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8842 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–840] 

Revocation of Antidumping Duty 

Order: Certain Orange Juice From 

Brazil 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On February 1, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated a sunset review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

orange juice (OJ) from Brazil.1 On April 

13, 2012, the International Trade 

Commission (ITC) determined that 

revocation of this order would not be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act).2 Therefore, 

pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(1)(iii), the 

Department is revoking the antidumping 

duty order on OJ from Brazil. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3874. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of the order includes 

certain orange juice for transport and/or 

further manufacturing, produced in two 

different forms: (1) Frozen orange juice 

in a highly concentrated form, 

sometimes referred to as frozen 

concentrated orange juice for 

manufacture (FCOJM); and (2) 

pasteurized single-strength orange juice 

which has not been concentrated, 

referred to as not-from-concentrate 

(NFC). At the time of the filing of the 

petition, there was an existing 

antidumping duty order on frozen 

concentrated orange juice (FCOJ) from 

Brazil.3 Therefore, the scope of the order 

with regard to FCOJM covers only 

FCOJM produced and/or exported by 

those companies which were excluded 

or revoked from the pre-existing 

antidumping order on FCOJ from Brazil 

as of December 27, 2004. Those 

companies are Cargill Citrus Limitada, 

Coinbra Frutesp S.A.,4 Fischer S.A. 

Comercio, Industria, and Agricultura, 

Montecitrus Trading S.A., and 

Sucocitrico Cutrale, S.A. 

Excluded from the scope of the order 

are reconstituted orange juice and 

frozen concentrated orange juice for 

retail (FCOJR). Reconstituted orange 

juice is produced through further 

manufacture of FCOJM, by adding 

water, oils and essences to the orange 

juice concentrate. FCOJR is 

concentrated orange juice, typically at 

42 Brix, in a frozen state, packed in 

retail-sized containers ready for sale to 

consumers. FCOJR, a finished consumer 

product, is produced through further 

manufacture of FCOJM, a bulk 

manufacturer’s product. 

The subject merchandise is currently 

classifiable under subheadings 

2009.11.00, 2009.12.25, 2009.12.45, and 

2009.19.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

These HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and for customs 

purposes only and are not dispositive. 

Rather, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Background 

On March 9, 2006, the Department 

published in the Federal Register an 

antidumping duty order on OJ from 

Brazil.5

On February 1, 2011, the Department 

initiated, and the ITC instituted, a 

sunset review of the antidumping duty 

order on OJ from Brazil. See Initiation 

Notice. As a result of its sunset review 

of this order, the Department found that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order would be likely to lead to the 

continuation or recurrence of dumping.6

The Department notified the ITC of the 

magnitude of the margins likely to 

prevail were the antidumping duty 

order to be revoked. 

On April 13, 2012, the ITC 

determined, pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Act, that revocation of this order 

would not be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time.7

Revocation 

As a result of the determination by the 

ITC that revocation of this order is not 

likely to lead to the continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States, the 

Department, pursuant to section 751(d) 

of the Act, is revoking the antidumping 

duty order on OJ from Brazil. Pursuant 

to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective date of 

revocation is March 9, 2011 (i.e., the 

fifth anniversary of the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the antidumping duty order). The 

Department will notify U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection to discontinue 

suspension of liquidation and collection 

of cash deposits on entries of the subject 

merchandise entered or withdrawn from 

warehouse on or after March 9, 2011, 

the effective date of revocation of the 

antidumping duty order. The 

Department will complete any pending 

administrative reviews of this order. 

This revocation and notice are issued 

in accordance with section 751(d)(2) of 

the Act and published pursuant to 

section 777(i)(1) of the Act. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
23660 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 76 

FR 67412 (November 1, 2011) (‘‘Sunset Initiation’’); 

see also Antidumping Duty Order: Silicon Metal 

From the People’s Republic of China, 56 FR 26649 

(June 10, 1991). 

2See Silicon Metal From the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 

10477 (February 22, 2012). 

3See id. 

4See Silicon Metal From China, 77 FR 20649 

(April 5, 2012). 

Dated: April 16, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9592 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–806] 

Silicon Metal From the People’s 

Republic of China: Continuation of 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of determinations 

by the Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) and the International 

Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on silicon metal from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States, respectively, the Department is 

publishing notice of the continuation of 

the antidumping duty order. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 20, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca Pandolph or Howard Smith, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3627 or (202) 482– 

5193, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 1, 2011, the Department 

published the notice of initiation of the 

third sunset review of the antidumping 

duty order on silicon metal from the 

PRC, pursuant to section 751(c) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’).1 The Department conducted an 

expedited sunset review of the order.2

As a result of its review, the Department 

found that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping and, thus, notified the ITC of 

the magnitude of the margins likely to 

prevail if the order were revoked.3

On April 5, 2012, the ITC published 

its determination, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act, which stated that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on silicon metal from the PRC 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time.4

Scope of the Order 

Imports covered by this order are 

shipments of silicon metal containing at 

least 96.00 but less than 99.99 percent 

of silicon by weight. Also covered by 

this order is silicon metal from the PRC 

containing between 89.00 and 96.00 

percent silicon by weight but which 

contains a higher aluminum content 

than the silicon metal containing at least 

96.00 percent but less than 99.99 

percent silicon by weight. Silicon metal 

is currently provided for under 

subheadings 2804.69.10 and 2804.69.50 

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

(HTS) as a chemical product, but is 

commonly referred to as a metal. 

Semiconductor-grade silicon (silicon 

metal containing by weight not less than 

99.99 percent of silicon and provided 

for in subheading 2804.61.00 of the 

HTS) is not subject to this order. 

Although the HTS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise is dispositive. 

Continuation of the Order 

As a result of determinations by the 

Department and the ITC that revocation 

of the antidumping duty order would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of 

the Act, the Department hereby orders 

the continuation of the antidumping 

duty order on silicon metal from the 

PRC. U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection will continue to collect 

antidumping duty cash deposits at the 

rates in effect at the time of entry for all 

imports of subject merchandise. 

The effective date of continuation of 

the order will be the date of publication 

in the Federal Register of this notice of 

continuation. Pursuant to section 

751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department 

intends to initiate the next five-year 

review of the order not later than 30 

days prior to the fifth anniversary of the 

effective date of continuation. The fiveyear (sunset) review and this notice are 

issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(c) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). 

Dated: April 11, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9347 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– 

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we 

invite comments on the question of 

whether instruments of equivalent 

scientific value, for the purposes for 

which the instruments shown below are 

intended to be used, are being 

manufactured in the United States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and 

be postmarked on or before May 10, 

2012. Address written comments to 

Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 

3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Washington, DC 20230. Applications 

may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 

5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce in Room 3720. 

Docket Number: 12–011. Applicant: 

Cornell University, 120 Baker Lab, 

Ithaca, NY 14853. Instrument: Pixel 

Array Detector. Manufacturer: Dectris 

Ltd., Switzerland. Intended Use: This 

instrument will be used to determine 

the composition of molecules and 

visualizing their interaction sat the 

molecular level. Pertinent 

characteristics of this instrument 

include shutterless data collection, low 

noise, high dynamic range, high readout 

speed and very fine phi slicing, not 

available in conventional chargecoupled device detectors. Justification 

for Duty-Free Entry: There are no 

instruments of the same general 

category manufactured in the United 

States. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: March 22, 

2012. 

Docket Number: 12–017. Applicant: 

Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 

South Cass Avenue, Lemont, IL 60439. 

Instrument: Pilatus 100K–S Detector. 

Manufacturer: Dectris Ltd., Switzerland. 

Intended Use: This instrument will be 

used to measure time evolution of x-ray 

diffraction signals from a variety of 

materials, including complex oxides 

and to determine the time-dependent 

atomic arrangements in those materials. 

Pertinent characteristics of this 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES