alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000015511
<NAME> THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      691
<ALLOWANCES>                                        49
<INVENTORY>                                        205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,323
<PP&E>                                          22,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,118
<BONDS>                                          1,303
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,848
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,069<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,282<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    659
<INCOME-TAX>                                       248
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                411
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       411
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>RESTATEMENT REFLECTED HEREIN IS THE RESULT OF RECLASSIFICATIONS TO PRIOR
PERIODS' FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO CONFORM TO THE CURRENT PERIOD PRESENTATION.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
 
I, **Sylvia Tang**, certify that:

(1)        I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended February 29, 2008 of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

(2)        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)        The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)        The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:     April 21, 2008.
*"Sylvia Tang"*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Witherspoon, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Vaughn, J.), rendered August 15, 1990, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues *590which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 23


                       Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Brush Wellman Inc. of our report dated January 22, 1996, included in the
1995 Annual Report to Shareholders of Brush Wellman Inc.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of Brush Wellman Inc.
listed in Item 14(a) 2.  This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. 
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule, referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and Post-Effective Amendments of our report dated January 22, 1996,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by
reference and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to
the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Brush Wellman Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1995:

    Registration Statement Number 33-60709 on Form S-8 dated June 29, 1995;

    Registration Statement Number 33-48866 on Form S-8 dated June 27, 1992;

    Registration Statement Number 33-45323 on Form S-8 dated February 3, 1992;

    Post-Effective Amendment Number 1 to Registration Statement Number 33-28950
    on Form S-8 dated February 3, 1992;

    Registration Statement Number 33-35979 on Form S-8 dated July 20, 1990;

    Registration Statement Number 33-28605 on Form S-8 dated May 5, 1989;

    Registration Statement Number 2-90724 on Form S-8 dated April 27, 1984;

    Post-Effective Amendment Number 3 to Registration Statement Number 2-64080
    on Form S-8 dated April 22, 1983.


                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Cleveland, Ohio
March 19, 1996
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7040
ELIZABETH KNEWASSER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE E. HONTS, III, Judge, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-427-R) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 21, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elizabeth Knewasser, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Knewasser v. Honts , No. CA-98-427-R (W.D. Va. July 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DYLAN RANDOLPH WOODWARD, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-2720 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 30, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Daniel Muller, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Upon review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we find no error with Dylan Woodward's judgment or sentence and affirm. We write only to correct a scrivener's error on Mr. Woodward's Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet. Mr. Woodward was found guilty by jury verdict, but his scoresheet incorrectly indicates- 2 -

that the charges were resolved by plea. On remand, the trial court shall correct this
error. Affirmed; remanded for correction of scrivener's error. MORRIS, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART ONE

PRINCIPLES

PRINCIPLES

TITLE II

PROVISIONS HAVING GENERAL APPLICATION

PROVISIONS HAVING GENERAL APPLICATION

Article 11

(ex Article 6 TEC)

(ex Article 6 TEC)

Environmental protection requirements must be integrated into the definition and implementation of the Union's policies and activities, in particular with a view to promoting sustainable development.

---
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| 1.     | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of A. M. Castle & Co. (the “Company”); and |
| 2.     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | June 25, 2013 |   |   |   |
|   |   |   | /s/ Scott F. Stephens |
|   |   |   | Scott F. Stephens |
|   |   |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |
|   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE II

FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

CHAPTER 1

THE CUSTOMS UNION

Article 30

(ex Article 25 TEC)

(ex Article 25 TEC)

Customs duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States. This prohibition shall also apply to customs duties of a fiscal nature.

---
Order filed December 5, 2013 

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

___________

NO. 01-12-00064-CR

____________

SCOTT FANCHER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Crim Ct at Law No 6

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1745796

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit No. 1 (a 

photograph).
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this 

court the original of State’s Exhibit No. 1 (a photograph), on or before December 

11, 2013. This case is set for submission on December 11, 2013. The Clerk of 

this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to 

deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of 

inspection, to return the original of State’s Exhibit No. 1 (a photograph), to the 

clerk of the Harris County District Clerk.

PER CURIAM
Compliance & Enforcement/Appeals Summary

Reporting Period: Fiscal Year (FY) 2016

Want to become an organic insider? Sign up to receive email updates from the NOP: NOPOrganicInsider

COMPLIANCE & ENFORCEMENT: OVERALL SUMMARY

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY 16 Summary (Oct 2015 - Sept 2016)

Incoming Complaints 121 121 135 122 499

Completed Complaint Reviews

and Investigations 82 93 76 106 357

APPEALS: OVERALL SUMMARY 1 (Refer to NOP 4011: Adverse Action Appeal Process for more information)

Number of Incoming 4 8 5 15 32

Appeals by Disposition

Decisions 6 0 1 1 8 (Q1: includes 5 received in FY15 and 1 

in FY 16)

Dismissals 0 2 0 1 3

Referrals 0 0 0 1 1 (Q4: referred to CASOP 2)

Closures 3 6 3 1 4 14 (Q1: includes 4 received in FY15 and 2 

in FY 16)

SUMMARY OF INITIAL ACTIONS TAKEN

Cease & Desist Orders 12 7 4 8 31

Notices of Warning 23 33 23 32 111

Investigation Referrals 13 18 14 13 58

SUMMARY OF DISPOSITIONS (All NOP)

Total # of Settlement Agreements 4 5 2 7 5 19 (Q3: includes 1 received in FY15)

Total # of Consent Decisions 1 0 0 0 1

Total Amount Civil Penalties Levied 5 $34,750 $16,500 $341,000 $5,500 $397,750

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING NOTES

1. On March 30, 2016, Bernard Saul of Bliss, Idaho, pleaded guilty to wire fraud and money laundering in connection with the sale of conventional 

alfalfa seed as organic. The National Organic Program and the Idaho State Department of Agriculture assisted the USDA Office of Inspector General 

with the investigation.

2. On April 1, 2016, a USDA Administrative Law Judge entered a consent decision regarding the sale of agricultural products as organic without 

certification by Yorgo Foods, Inc. (Yorgo), of Manchester, New Hampshire. Per the decision, Yorgo agreed to a 3-year suspension of its organic 

certification and a civil penalty of $880,000, with $540,000 held in abeyance, provided it complies with the OFPA and the USDA organic regulations 

during the period of suspension.

General Notes:

1. Total reflects appeals closed in FY 2016 regardless of when cases were initiated.

2. California State Organic Program (CASOP) oversees organic enforcement in the state of California, and is currently the only approved State 

Organic Program in the United States.

3. All closures in Q4 were the result of the certifier reaching a settlement agreement with the operator to bring the operator into compliance.

4. Not all settlement agreements include civil penalties and not all civil penalties were levied via settlement agreements.

5. Total reflects the amount of penalties initially levied. Amounts may change during negotiation of settlements and individual penalty payments 

may be outstanding.
Exhibit
10.141


 


AMMENDMENT
NO 1. TO THE 2% CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $650,000 DUE JUNE 21, 2022 (“AMENDMENT NO. 1”)


 


Date:
June 20, 2022


 


Reference
is made to that certain 2% Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of $650,000 due June 21, 2022, as may be amended from
tie to time (the “Note”), of Clean Energy Technologies, Inc., a Nevada Corporation
(the “Company”) doing business in Costa Mesa, CA to Universal Scope Inc., a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands
(the “Holder”).


 


The
Holder and the Company agree to modify the terms of the Note as follows:


 


1.
The language of Preamble of the Note shall be modified in the following manner:


 


at
any time on or before June 21, 2022 (the “Maturity Date”)” shall be changed to “at any time on or before June
21, 2023 (the “Maturity Date”).”


 


No
other term of the Note is modified or amended.


 


2.
This Amendment shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and all questions concerning the construction, validity, interpretation
and performance of this Amendment shall be governed by, the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to provisions thereof
regarding conflict of laws. Each party hereby irrevocably submits to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts sitting
in New York, New York for the adjudication of any dispute hereunder or in connection herewith or with any transaction contemplated hereby
or discussed herein, and hereby irrevocably waives, and agrees not to assert in any suit, action or proceeding, any claim that is not
personally subject to the jurisdiction of any such court, that such suit, action or proceeding is brought in an inconvenient forum or
that the venue of such suit, action or proceeding is improper. Each party hereby irrevocably waives personal service of process and consents
to process being served in any such suit, action or proceeding by sending, through certified mail or overnight courier, a copy thereof
to such party at the address for such notices to it under this Amendment and agrees that such service shall constitute good and sufficient
service of process and notice thereof. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to limit in any way any right to serve process in any
manner permitted by law. EACH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLYWAIVES ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE, AND AGREES NOT TO REQUEST, AJURY TRIAL FOR THE ADJUDICATION
OFANY DISPUTE HEREUNDER OR IN CONNECTION HEREWITH OR ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT OR ANYTRANSACTIONCONTEMPLATED HEREBY.


 


3.
This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each
of which shall be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same document. Signatures transmitted by facsimile
shall be deemed valid execution of this Amendment binding on the parties.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.


 


	CLEAN
    ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.	 	UNIVERSAL
    SCOPE, INC
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	By:	 
	Name:	Kambiz
    Mahdi	 	Name:	         
	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer	 	Title:
<PAGE>
                                                               EXHIBIT 10(ii)(w)

                                AMENDMENT NO. 2
                           J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC.
                       1999 SEPARATION ALLOWANCE PROGRAM
                                      FOR
                      PROFIT-SHARING MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors authorized an Agreement and Plan of Merger
(the "Merger Agreement") between J. C. Penney Company, Inc.  ("Company"), J. C.
Penney Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Holdings"), and JCP Merger Sub,
Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Holdings
("Merger Sub");

     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and
into Company, with Company surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings
(the "Merger");

     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Merger, Holdings will amend and restate its
certificate of incorporation to inter alia change its name to "J. C.  Penney
Company, Inc.";

     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Merger, Company will amend and restate its
certificate of incorporation to inter alia, change its name to "J. C. Penney
Corporation, Inc.";

     NOW, THEREFORE, as authorized by the Board, the J. C. Penney Company, Inc.
1999 Separation Allowance Program for Profit-Sharing Management Associates
("SAP"), as amended on September 9, 1999, be, and it hereby is, further amended,
effective as of the effective time of the Merger as set forth in the
Merger Agreement (expected to be January 27, 2002), as follows:

1.   The name of the program shall be the "J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc. 1999
     Separation Allowance Program".

2.   The definition of "Company" in Section 2.01 is amended in its entirety to
     read as follows: "Company" shall mean J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc., a
                       -------
     Delaware corporation and any successor corporation.

3.   All references in the definition of "Change of Control" to "Company" in
                                          -----------------
     Section 2.01 of the SAP are deleted and replaced with "Parent Company."

4.   "Parent Company" is added as a defined term to Section 2.01 of the SAP, as
      --------------
     follows: "Parent Company" shall mean J. C. Penney Holdings, Inc. until such
               --------------
     time as it changes its name to J. C. Penney Company, Inc., at which time it
     shall mean J. C. Penney Company, Inc., and any successor corporation.

In all other respects the SAP, as amended, remains unchanged and in full force
and effect.

DATED this 25th day of January 2002.

                                               J. C. Penney Company, Inc.

                                               /s/Charles R. Lotter
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Charles R. Lotter
                                               Executive Vice President,
                                               Secretary and General Counsel