alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10-185



March 28, 2002



Mr. Michael A. Lubin
Chairman of the Board
Lexington Precision Corporation
767 Third Avenue
New York, NY  10017

Dear Mr. Lubin:

Please be advised that Bank One, NA has approved the extension of the following
credit facilities until July 1, 2002:

-    Note #67 with a current outstanding balance of $906,533.57. This loan will
     continue to amortize based on fixed principal payments of $8,333.33 plus
     accrued interest monthly.

-    Note #158 with a current outstanding balance of $1,255,555.63. This loan
     will continue to amortize based on fixed principal payments of $11,111.11
     plus accrued interest monthly.

-    Note #174 with a current outstanding balance of $2,078,212.10. This loan
     will continue to amortize based on fixed principal payments of $16,759.78
     plus accrued interest monthly.

-    Note #190 with a current outstanding balance of $1,057,777.71. This loan
     will continue to amortize based on fixed principal payments of $8,888.89
     plus accrued interest monthly.

Should you have any questions regarding these amendments / extensions, please
feel free to contact me at (330) 972-1892.

Sincerely,

/s/  Randy J. Abrams

Randy J. Abrams
Assistant Vice President
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1281 

To repeal the Environmental Protection Agency’s most recent rule for new 

residential wood heaters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. ROUZER (for himself and Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal the Environmental Protection Agency’s most recent 

rule for new residential wood heaters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop EPA Overregula5 tion of Rural Americans Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RULE FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL WOOD 

7 HEATERS. 

8 The final rule entitled ‘‘Standards of Performance for 

9 New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic 

10 Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces’’ published at 80 Fed. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1281 IH

1 Reg. 13672 (March 16, 2015) shall have no force or effect 

2 and shall be treated as if such rule had never been issued. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CelaneseHoldings LLC (the "Company") on Form10-Q for the period ending June  30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Corliss J. Nelson,Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|          |                                                                                                                      |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|          |                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. |

Date: August 12, 2005

/s/Corliss J. NelsonCorliss J. NelsonVice President andChief Financial Officer

----
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 25, 2011

On July 7

th, 2011 we held a meeting in Ann Arbor, MI with the Hybrid Manufacturers 

Regulatory Collaboration (HMRC) to discuss concerns raised by members of the HMRC

regarding heavy-duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. Concerns were raised 

during the comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed rulemaking that 

heavy-duty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 heavy-duty OBD regulations 

that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking.1,2 Specifically, they have requested a 

delay of the application of HD OBD requirements for hybrid applications until 2020. Attendees 

from the EPA and HMRC are shown below.

Attendee Affiliation

Cleophas Jackson EPA – Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division

Anthony Neam EPA – Assessment and Standards Division

Amy Kopin EPA – Assessment and Standards Division

Barbara Chance Allison Transmission

Ian McKenzie Eaton Corporation

Derek Matthews BAE Systems

Jim Lyons Sierra Research

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
3/25/2015

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

eSfSPQSv

©FFBCOAL BUSINESSSTATE OF TEX^Sl;".

PENALTY FOR;"'", .>

PRIVATE U$|£: ;'">"*

OLTMAN, RONALD KEITH trl bt. No^wfpt This is to advise that the Court *tes^en.i^wi?hc^^j'iften order the application for

writ of habeas corpus on th^J^iWg^ofttheiri^lQourt without ahearing.

""* 'VVi '"""** Abel Acosta, Clerk

JlT %

«0^CP^BNALD KEITH OLTMAN

c.^

02 1R

0006557458

PIINEV BOWES

MAR 26 2015

MA,LEDFROM;WR?§2)8P4d,-bl
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 4.7    
  


 
 

AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR TO THE
  NON-STANDARDIZED JOINDER AGREEMENT FOR THE
  CROSSMANN COMMUNITIES, INC.
  401(k) PROFIT SHARING PLAN    
  


        THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR is executed on behalf of Crossmann Communities, Inc. ("Crossmann"). 


WITNESSETH: 


        WHEREAS,
Crossmann adopted the Crossmann Communities, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the "Plan"), effective as of February 28, 1991, and such Plan has been subsequently amended from to
time to time; 


        WHEREAS,
pursuant to the provisions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger among Beazer Homes USA, Inc., Beazer Homes Investment Corp. ("Beazer"), and Crossmann (the "Agreement"), Crossmann
shall be merged into Beazer, effective upon the closing of the merger pursuant to the terms of the Agreement (the "Effective Time"), and the surviving corporation shall be Beazer Homes Investment
Corp.; 


        WHEREAS,
Crossmann now desires to amend the Joinder Agreement for the Plan to reflect the merger of Crossmann into Beazer, contingent upon actual closing of the merger under the terms of
the Agreement; and 


        WHEREAS,
Crossmann reserved the right to amend its elections in the Joinder Agreement for Plan pursuant to Sections 7.12 and 8.01(b) of the Plan. 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the Effective Time of the merger; provided, however, if no such merger occurs under the terms of the Agreement, this Amendment
shall have no effect: 



        1.    All
references to "Crossmann Communities, Inc." are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced with "Beazer Homes Investment Corp." 


        2.    All
references to the "Crossmann Communities, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan" are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced with "Beazer Homes Investment Corp.
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan." 


        3.    The
Employer Stock Fund shall hold and invest in Beazer Homes USA, Inc. common stock ("Beazer Stock"), and shall cease to hold Crossmann Stock. 



        4.    Each
Participant with an interest in the Employer Stock Fund shall have such shares converted into Merger Consideration, as defined under the Agreement, in the form of
the "Base Merger Consideration" of cash and Beazer Stock, as specifically provided under Section 2.3(a) of the Agreement. 



[REMAINDER OF PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK] 







        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Crossmann has caused this Amendment Number Four to the Joinder Agreement for the Plan to be executed this 18th day of March, 2002. 



	 	 	CROSSMANN COMMUNITIES, INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ Jennifer Holihen
	 	 	 	 	

	

 	
 	

Title:	
 	

 
	 	 	 	 	












QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 4.7


AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR TO THE NON-STANDARDIZED JOINDER AGREEMENT FOR THE CROSSMANN COMMUNITIES, INC. 401(k) PROFIT SHARING PLAN
#### Jack Colden, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

1. A preliminary question is not objectionable although further evidence may be necessary to render admissible the testimony sought ultimately to be elicited.

2. To avoid improper testimony given in answer to a proper question, there should be a motion to strike.

This case ivas decided by Division A.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Holmes County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*Price &*Watson, for plaintiff in error;

*W. H.*Ellis, Attorney General, for the state.

Cockrell, J.

— Jack Golden, indicted in the circuit court for Holmes county for the murder of Will James, *44was convicted of murder in the second degree and sentenced to life imprisonment. Upon his writ of error he relies for reversal upon the overruling of an objection interposed for him .at the trial.

The state offered as its witness in rebuttal of testimony by one Gus Tanner for the defense, a juror at the coroner’s inquest, and asked him “Do you recollect where Gus Tanner testified'he was standing at the time this occurred ?” Before the question was answered the defense brought out the fact that the coroner took the testimony-down in writing and that it was signed by Tanner and then objected to the question on the ground that such writing was the best evidence. The objection was overruled and the witness answered that he did remember and further gave his recollection of that testimony. No motion was made to strike the answer in whole or in part, and it is evident that the question, a preliminary one, was of itself wholly innocuous. Should we grant the contention of the plaintiff in error that' the “best evidence” rule obtains under these circumstances, it is apparent the state was not called upon to make any further showing at the time until it first ascertained that the witness’ memory was such as to be of assistance, should the difficulty be overcome. Mere preliminary questions ordinarily cannot be objected 'to. Dickens v. State, 50 Fla. 17, 38 South. Rep. 909; Ortiz v. State, 30 Fla. 256, 11 South. Rep. 611.

The judgment is affirmed.

Si-iackleford, C. J., and Wi-iitfield, J., concur;

Taylor, LIocker and Parki-iill, JJ., concur in the opinion.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-99407, 333-58730, 333-105754, and 333-106737)
and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-60544, 333-60536,
333-60546, 333-60548, 333-60542, and 333-103292) of White Electronic Designs
Corporation of our report dated November 25, 2003 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
December 24, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officers of Barra, Inc. (the "Company") each hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 12, 2003



| |     |                    
| | --- | -------------------
| | By: | /s/ Kamal Duggirala

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Kamal Duggirala        
| | Chief Executive Officer



Dated: August 12, 2003



| |     |                  
| | --- | -----------------
| | By: | /s/ Greg Stockett

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Greg Stockett          
| | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, and is
not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

****
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00004-CV

Valley Regional Medical Center

v.

Maria Guadalupe Camacho

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 1 of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2013-CCL-448

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court 

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs 

of the appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 9, 2015
Page 2

        Date:   4/15/16

​​​

TO:  Christopher A. Dowden #1927137

        Wheeler Unit

        986 CR AA

        Plainview, TX 79072

RE:  Case No 02-14-195-CR    Style: Christopher A. Dowden vs. State

We are in receipt of your correspondence in connection with the above case.

Our records do not indicate an appeal pending in this court.  Contact the attorney or the trial court for information about the case, or provide this court with an appeal number.

Our records indicate you are pro se/have counsel.  The attorney is/was

.

Appellant's/State's  was/is due on

.

The status of the above referenced case is:

  Still pending.  No opinion has issued as of this date.

  Opinion has issued.  

**(****The case is closed. Mandate issued on 3/13/15.**

  Pending on motion for rehearing.

  Pending at the Court of Criminal Appeals on a Petition for 

Discretionary Review.

Neither the judges nor the staff of this court can give legal advice.  You may wish to contact Inmate Legal Services, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, P.O. Box 99, Huntsville, TX 77340.

This court has no jurisdiction to compel the trial court to provide you with free copies.  This court does not provide copies of any documents without prepayment of costs.  Our charge is 10 cents per page up to 50 pages and 50 cents per page thereafter, payable in advance by cashier's check or money order.  If you desire copies of any part of your record, send a cashier's check or money order in the amount of $75.00.  There is a $38.66 fee for retrieving any **closed case** from our private storage facilities.  As much of your record will be copied as the remaining will cover.  You will be advised as to the cost for copying the remainder of the record.  Payment for the remainder of the record must be paid within thirty (30) days from the date you are notified.  If your request does not add up to the $75.00, the balance will be returned to you.  **Make cashier’s check or money order payable to Clerk, Court of Appeals.**

The Court of Criminal Appeals, Austin, Texas, has jurisdiction over article 11.07 post conviction writs of habeas corpus/out of time appeals.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011).  This writ can only be filed with the district clerk’s office of the county in which you were convicted.  *Id.*

The papers you requested are enclosed.

The papers you tendered are being returned to you.

Respectfully yours,

DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK

Karen Brown

  By: Karen Brown, Deputy Clerk
Exhibit
      23.2


10K

















Consent
      of Independent
      Registered Public Accounting Firm





The
      Board
      of Directors


The
      Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.:




We
      consent to the
      incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-87450 and
      333-140957) on Form S-8 of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. of our report
      dated March 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofThe Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. and subsidiaries ("the Company")
      as
      of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes
      in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows (before the
      effects of the adjustments described in Note 16 to the consolidated financial
      statements), and the consolidated financial statement schedule included as
      Item
      15(a)(2) on the Company's Form 10-K, for the years ended December 31, 2006
      and
      2005,which report
      appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of the
      Company.




Our
      audit
      report on the consolidated financial statements refers to accounting changes
      as
      a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
      No. 123(R), Share-Based
      Payment.




Our
      audit
      report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the fact that we
      did
      not audit, review, or apply any procedures to the adjustments to retrospectively
      apply the change in accounting described in Note 16 to the consolidated
      financial statements, and that those adjustments were audited by a successor
      auditor.






/s/
      KPMG, LLP


KPMG,
      LLP


McLean,
      Virginia


March
      27,
      2008


65
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1267 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 403
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1267

                          [Report No. 116-503]

    To designate a mountain ridge in the State of Montana as ``B-47 
                                Ridge''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2019

Mr. Gianforte introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

                           September 14, 2020

  Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources; committed to the 
 Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to 
                               be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To designate a mountain ridge in the State of Montana as ``B-47 
                                Ridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``B-47 Ridge Designation Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF B-47 RIDGE, MONTANA.

    (a) Designation.--
            (1) In general.--The unnamed mountain ridge located at 
        4514'40.89"N, 11043'38.75"W that runs south and west of 
        Emigrant Peak in the Absaroka Range in the State of Montana, 
        which is the approximate site of a crash of a B-47, shall be 
        known and designated as ``B-47 Ridge''.
            (2) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
        document, paper, or other record of the United States to the 
        ridge described in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a 
        reference to ``B-47 Ridge''.
    (b) Authorization for Plaque.--
            (1) In general.--A plaque that memorializes the crash of 
        the B-47 (including denoting the names of the victims of the 
        crash) may be installed on B-47 Ridge.
            (2) Funding.--No Federal funds may be used to design, 
        procure, install, or maintain the plaque authorized under 
        paragraph (1).
                                                 Union Calendar No. 403

116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1267

                          [Report No. 116-503]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To designate a mountain ridge in the State of Montana as ``B-47 
                                Ridge''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 14, 2020

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aventura Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig A. Waltzer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |     |  |                                                
|------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|May 14, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Craig A. Waltzer                           
|             |  |     |  | Craig A. Waltzer                               
|             |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

End of Filing