1250 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 8, 2013 / Notices 

If additional information is required, 

contact Jerri Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3W– 

1407B, Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: January 3, 2013. 

Jerri Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00147 Filed 1–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1103–NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed New Collection; 

Comments Requested; Stress 

Resiliency Study Questionnaires for 

Milwaukee Police Department 

ACTION: 60–Day notice. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ) 

Office of Community Oriented Policing 

Services (COPS) will be submitting the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The revision of 

a previously approved information 

collection is published to obtain 

comments from the public and affected 

agencies. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for 60 days for public comment until 

March 11, 2013. This process is 

conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 

1320.10. 

If you have comments, especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Danielle Ouellette, 

Department of Justice, Office of 

Community Oriented Policing Services, 

145 N Street NE., Washington, DC 

20530. Written comments and 

suggestions from the public and affected 

agencies concerning the proposed 

collection of information are 

encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Proposed new collection; comments 

requested. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: Stress 

Resiliency Study Questionnaires for 

Milwaukee Police Department. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

None. U.S. Department of Justice Office 

of Community Oriented Policing 

Services. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: The Milwaukee Police 

Department (MPD) will be the affected 

public who is subject to this survey 

through a COPS cooperative agreement 

with the MPD. These surveys will be 

used to collect data on MPD officers’ 

perceived stress, responses to stressful 

experiences, stress and its relationship 

to biometrics and related 

questionnaires. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond/reply: It is estimated that 120 

respondents annually will complete the 

form within .57 hours (34 minutes). 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: There are an estimated 68 

total annual burden hours associated 

with this collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Jerri Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3W– 

1407B, Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: January 3, 2013. 

Jerri Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00148 Filed 1–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–AT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Air 

Act 

On December 20, 2012, the 

Department of Justice lodged a proposed 

Consent Decree with the United States 

District Court for the District of 

Massachusetts in the lawsuit entitled, 

United States of America v. Solutia, Inc. 

and INEOS Melamines, LLC, Civil 

Action No. 3:12–cv–12377–KPN. 

In its Complaint, the United States 

alleged that the Defendant’s actions at 

their chemical manufacturing plant 

violated the Clean Air Act, and 

regulations promulgated pursuant to the 

Clean Air Act. The alleged violations 

occurred at the Defendants’ Indian 

Orchard Plant in Springfield, 

Massachusetts. The United States 

alleges in its Complaint that Defendants 

violated: (A) Sections 112 and 502 of the 

Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7412 and 

7661a, and implementing regulations; 

(B) the Final Reasonably Available 

Control Technology Compliance Plan 

Conditional Approval issued by the 

Massachusetts Department of 

Environmental Protection 

(‘‘Massachusetts DEP’’) on June 20, 1989 

which contains requirements on the 

operation of the Plant; and (C) the Air 

Quality Operating Permit issued to 

Solutia Inc. on June 26, 2005 by the 

Massachusetts DEP pursuant to Title V 

of the Clean Air Act and 310 C.M.R. 

7.00: Appendix C which also contains 

requirements on the operation of the 

Plant. 

Upon entry of Consent Decree, the 

Defendants will pay a civil penalty in 

the amount of $970,000 to the United 

States. In addition, under the terms of 

the Consent Decree, the Defendants will 

implement an enhanced leak detection 

and repair system to control and manage 

the air pollutants emitted at the facility. 

As part of this leak detection and repair 

system, the Defendants will undertake 

efforts above and beyond what is 

currently required by the Clean Air Act 

and the regulations that the United 

States alleged were violated at the Plant. 

Pursuant to the proposed Consent 

Decree, the Defendants will conduct 

more frequent monitoring for possible 

equipment leaks, use lower thresholds 

for the repairs of leaks, replace leaking 

equipment more quickly with improved 

equipment, and conduct third-party 

audits of its leak detection and repair 

program. 

The proposed Consent Decree 

resolves both Solutia Inc.’s liability, and 

INEOS Melamines, LLC’s liability for all 

of the violations of the Clean Air Act 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 8, 2013 / Notices 1251 

that the United States alleges in its 

Complaint. 

The publication of this notice initiates 

a 30-day period for public comment on 

the proposed Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and should refer to United 

States of America v. Solutia, Inc. and 

INEOS Melamines, LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 

90–5–2–1–09980. All comments must be 

submitted no later than thirty (30) days 

after the publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit comments: ........ Send them to: 

By e-mail ............................ pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov. 

By mail ............................... Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ–ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the Consent Decree may be examined 

and downloaded at this Justice 

Department Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide 

a paper copy of the Consent Decree 

upon written request and payment of 

reproduction costs. Please mail your 

request and payment to: Consent Decree 

Library, U.S. DOJ–ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $18.25 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury. 

Ronald G. Gluck, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00092 Filed 1–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Air 

Act, the Clean Water Act and the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act 

On December 31, 2012, the 

Department of Justice lodged a proposed 

Consent Decree with the United States 

District Court for the District of South 

Carolina in the lawsuit entitled United 

States v. Weylchem US, Inc., Civil 

Action No. 3:12-cv-03639–CMC. 

In Weylchem, the United States of 

America (‘‘United States’’), on behalf of 

the Administrator of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’), filed a complaint pursuant to 

the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et 

seq.; the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 

1301 et seq.; and the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 

U.S.C. 6901 et seq., alleging violations 

of these statutes at Weylchem US, Inc.’s 

(‘‘Weylchem’’) facilities in Elgin, South 

Carolina and Lugoff, South Carolina. 

The South Carolina Department of 

Health and Environmental Control 

(‘‘SCDHEC’’) filed a Complaint in 

Intervention alleging claims under the 

South Carolina Pollution Control Act, 

S.C. Code Section 48–1–110. Under the 

proposed consent decree, Weylchem 

agrees to come into compliance with the 

requirements of the environmental 

statutes and pay a civil penalty of 

$500,000, of which $175,000 shall be 

paid to SCDHEC. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

Consent Decree. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and should refer to 

United States v. Weylchem US, Inc., D.J. 

Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–08542/1. All 

comments must be submitted no later 

than thirty (30) days after the 

publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit comments: ........ Send them to: 

By e-mail ............................ pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov. 

By mail ............................... Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, D.C. 20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the Consent Decree may be examined 

and downloaded at this Justice 

Department Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide 

a paper copy of the Consent Decree 

upon written request and payment of 

reproduction costs. Please mail your 

request and payment to: Consent Decree 

Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 

7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $30.25 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury. For a paper copy 

without the exhibits and signature 

pages, the cost is $13.00. 

Henry S. Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2013–00060 Filed 1–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Oil 

Pollution Act 

On December 21, 2012, the 

Department of Justice lodged a proposed 

consent decree with the United States 

District Court for the District of Hawaii 

in United States and the State of Hawaii 

v. Cape Flattery Limited et al., Civil 

Action No. 12–00693JMS–BMK. The 

proposed consent decree would require 

Cape Flattery Limited and Pacific Basin 

(HK) Limited to pay $7.5 million to 

resolve the United States’ and the State 

of Hawaii’s (‘‘the State’’) natural 

resource damage claims brought 

pursuant to Sections 1002 and 1006 of 

the Oil Pollution Act, 33 U.S.C. 2702, 

2706, and Section 128D of the Hawaii 

Environmental Response law, Haw. Rev. 

Stat. § 128D. 

In this action, the United States and 

the State seek removal costs, natural 

resource damages, and natural resource 

damage assessment costs relating to the 

February 2005 grounding of the M/V 

Cape Flattery on coral reef habitat 

outside the entrance channel to Barbers 

Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii. The 

proposed $7.5 million payment would 

reimburse the United States and the 

State for removal costs, damages to 

natural resources, and assessment costs. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

consent decree. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and should refer to 

United States and the State of Hawaii v. 

Cape Flattery Limited et al., D.J. Ref. No. 

90–5–1–1–10600. All comments must be 

submitted no later than thirty (30) days 

after the publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with