alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steven Johnston, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  April 29, 2005 | /s/ Steven JohnstonSteven Johnston
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Ortiz, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), rendered July 23, 1990.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed *(see, People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1). Bracken, J. P., Hooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.2

INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes
effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a
security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an
accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection with the registration statement.

In
June of 2002, Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") was convicted of obstructing justice, which is a felony offense. The SEC prohibits firms convicted of a felony from auditing public
companies. Andersen is thus unable to consent to the incorporation by reference of the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-42991, 33-60191,
33-60842, 333-13157, 333-30069, 333-42011, 333-56577, 333-69353, 333-89031, 333-89033, 333-31426, 333-51320, 333-57814 and 333-74268) and Andersen's audit report with respect to Tom Brown, Inc.'s
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2001 and for the two years in the period then ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits Tom Brown,
Inc. to file this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statements, without a written consent from Andersen. As a result, with respect to
transactions in Tom Brown, Inc. securities pursuant to the Registration Statements that occur subsequent to the date this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Andersen
or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a claim against Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# DATES:

*Time and Date:*                         1 p.m.-4 p.m., June 20, 2012 (Closed).                    

# PLACE:

Teleconference.

# STATUS:

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.

# MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED:

The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Conducting Operational Research to Measure or Mitigate Morbidity and Mortality of Populations Affected by Humanitarian Emergencies, FOA GH12-007.”

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Diana Bartlett, Scientific Review Officer, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of Science Quality, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop D-72, Atlanta, Georgia 30033, Telephone (404) 639-4938.

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: April 25, 2012.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2012-9924 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Independent Auditors' Consent









Exhibit 10(i)


 



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT


 



To the Board of Directors of




C.M. Life Insurance Company


 



          We consent to the use in this Post Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 333-95845 on Form
N-4 of our report dated February 15, 2002 for the MassMutual Artistry Segment of C.M. Multi-Account A and of our report dated March 1, 2002, on C.M. Life Insurance Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory
paragraphs referring to the use of statutory accounting practices and the change in certain accounting practices as a result of the State of Connecticut Insurance Department’s adoption of the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners’ Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual effective January 1, 2001, all of which practices differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America), appearing in the Statement of Additional
Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Statement of Additional Information.


 



Deloitte & Touche LLP


 



Hartford, Connecticut




April 25, 2002
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(a)

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

<PAGE>

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports
(1) dated February 15, 2002 with respect to the statutory-basis financial
statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company and (2) dated
February 1, 2002 with respect to certain subaccounts of Retirement Builder
Variable Annuity Account, which are available for investment by contract
owners of The One Income Annuity, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 6
to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-78743) and related Prospectus
of The One Income Annuity.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
April 25, 2002
Received:830 Feb 2015 09:38am P001

02-02-'15 09:35 FROM- Atascosa Stat Judge 830 T-741 P0001/0001 F-989

Jfourtl) Court of CO

ro

-o

3:

NOTIFICATION OF LATE RECORD

Court of Appeals No., if known: Q4~15-00017-CR

Trial Court stvie:The State of Texas v. Joseph Losoya

Trial Court No.: 29941

am the official responsible for preparing the clerk's record/reporter's record [circle one] in the abovereferenced appeal. The approximate date of trial was: n-21 -2104

The record was originally due: 1-21-2015 (not sure if this is correct)

anticipate the length of the record to be:

am unable to file the record by the date such record is due because [check one]:

the appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee, and the appellant has railed to pay the

fee or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing such record.

my other duties or activities preclude working on the record and include the following [attach

additional pages if needed]:

Other. Explain [attach additional pages if needed]: Have been OUt SJCk With SJnUS

infection, flu and bronchitis for an extended period.

anticipate the record will be completed by: 3-2-2015

1, as the undersigned court official, certify that copy ofthis Notification of Late Record has been served by first class

mail of fax to the parties to thejudgment or order being appealed.

Date: 2-2-2015

Printed

Name: Cynthia D, Lewis, CSR

Titie: official court reporter

Rev. 1.8.14
(June 25, 1991)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Wright, Appellant.

—Judgment of the Supreme *523Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J.), rendered on November 27, 1989, which convicted defendant, after a jury trial, of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and the matter is remanded for a new trial.

Near the close of the defendant’s case, a sitting juror requested discharge from continued jury service because it would interfere with her vacation plans. The Court excused the juror, without the express consent of the defense, and despite the juror’s expressed willingness to return for summations and deliberations. This was error. (CPL 270.35; *see, People v Washington,*75 NY2d 740.)

The Trial Court also erred in its instruction to the jury with respect to the defendant’s decision not to testify. The Court gave the following instruction to the jury:

"The defendant doesn’t have to take the stand and, indeed, in this case the defendant did not take the stand. That is his absolute election.

"By not taking the stand he essentially says, I don’t have to prove anything. The prosecutor has to prove it. I don’t have to aid or encourage or discourage the prosecution. I believe I’m not guilty and let the prosecutor prove her case.

"Your duty is not to hold it against him when he elects not to testify as he did here, because that is his absolute right under our American system.”

As we stated in *People v Garcia*(160 AD2d 354), which we reversed because of a substantially similar charge, this type of excessively lengthy charge unnecessarily draws attention to defendant’s exercise of his right not to testify. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Asch, Kassal and Smith JJ.
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING 

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND 

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE.

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT 

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S 

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT 

USDA, AMS, FVP, SCI

831 MITTEN ROAD, ROOM 200

BURLINGAME, CA 94010

PHONE: 650-552-9073

FAX: 650-552-9147

EQUIPMENT CATALOG
PEAS 

WELL DEVELOPED PEAS 

FAIRLY WELL DEVELOPED PEAS 

POORLY DEVELOPED PEAS 

Peas, Photo No. 1

October 1990 (Previously No. 1, no date)
PEAS 

NOT U.S. NO. 1 – APPEARANCE OF PODS SERIOUSLY AFFECTED 

Peas, Photo No. 2

October 1990 (Previously No. 2, no date)
#### Robert D. O’Connell, P. C., et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Schlegel Corporation et al., Respondents, and Charles P. Schlegel, II, Intervenor-Respondent-Appellant.

(Appeal No. 3.)

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in *Robert D. O’Connell, P. C. v Schlegel Corp.*([appeal No. 1] 174 AD2d 1024 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J.—Amend Reply.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,904
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  155,869
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,829
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,243
<PP&E>                                         677,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 916,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          140,050
<BONDS>                                        260,365
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           489
<OTHER-SE>                                     428,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   916,027
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               660,874
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  523,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,418
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 74,595
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,901
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             51,694
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,694
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carmelo Alamo Lopez, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Vincent Vitale, J.), rendered on May 4, 1989, convicting defendant upon a plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 8 to 24 years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
**Exhibit 21** **SUBSIDIARIES    OF THE COMPANY**     Listed below are the significant subsidiaries of the Company and    their jurisdictions of organization. All are wholly-owned unless    otherwise indicated. Other subsidiaries have been omitted    because, considered in the aggregate, they would not constitute    a significant subsidiary.      **Name of Subsidiary** **Organization**  Bowne & Co., Inc.           Delaware Bowne Business Communications,    Inc.           New York Bowne Enterprise Solutions, LLC          New York Bowne International de Mexico,    S.A. de C.V.           Mexico Bowne International Holdings GmbH          Switzerland Bowne International, LLC          Delaware Bowne International, Ltd.           United Kingdom Bowne International, SAS          France Bowne Japan & Co,    Inc.           Japan Bowne Litigation Solutions, LP          Delaware Bowne MBC, LLC          Delaware Bowne of Atlanta, Inc.           Georgia Bowne of Boston, Inc.           Massachusetts Bowne of Canada, Ltd.           Ontario, Canada Bowne of Chicago, Inc.           Delaware Bowne of Cleveland, Inc.           Ohio Bowne of Dallas Limited Partnership          Delaware Bowne of Europe, B.V          Netherlands Bowne of Gibraltar B.V          Netherlands Bowne of Los Angeles, Inc.           California Bowne of New York City, LLC          New York Bowne of Phoenix, Inc.           Arizona Bowne of South Bend, Inc.           Delaware Bowne of the Netherlands B.V          Netherlands Bowne Solutions, LLC          Delaware Bowne Technology Enterprise, LLC          New York CaseSoft, Ltd. (1)          Florida CaseVenture, LC (2)          Florida Color Cave, Inc.           California DecisionQuest, Inc.           California DecisionQuest II, LP          Texas DQ Squared, Inc.           California       (1)     49% owned by an affiliate of the Company     (2)     50% owned by an affiliate of the Company
**Received:830 Feb** **2015 09:38am** **P001**

### 02-02-'15**09:35 FROM-** **Atascosa Stat** **Judge 830** **T-741 P0001/0001** **F-989**

# Jfourtl)**Court of** **CO ro** **-o 3:** 

## NOTIFICATION**OF LATE** **RECORD**

# Court**of Appeals** **No., if** **known: Q4~15-00017-CR** **Trial Court** **stvie:The State** **of Texas** **v. Joseph** **Losoya Trial** **Court No.:** **29941 am** **the official** **responsible for** **preparing the** **clerk's record/reporter's** **record [circle** **one] in** **the above** **referenced appeal.** **The approximate** **date of** **trial was:** **n-21 -2104** **The record** **was originally** **due: 1-21-2015** **(not sure** **if this** **is correct)** **anticipate the** **length of** **the record** **to be:** **am unable** **to file** **the record** **by the** **date such** **record is** **due because** **[check one]:** 

### the**appellant is** **not entitled** **to appeal** **without paying** **the fee,** **and the** **appellant has** **railed to** **pay the** **fee or** **make arrangements** **to pay** **the fee** **for preparing** **such record.** 

### my**other duties** **or activities** **preclude working** **on the** **record and** **include the** **following [attach** **additional pages** **if needed]:** 

## Other.**Explain [attach** **additional pages** **if needed]:** **Have been** **OUt SJCk** **With SJnUS** **infection, flu** **and bronchitis** **for an** **extended period.** 

## anticipate**the record** **will be** **completed by:** **3-2-2015 1,** **as the** **undersigned court** **official, certify** **that copy** **of this** **Notification of** **Late Record** **has been** **served by** **first class** **mail of** **fax to** **the parties** **to the** **judgment or** **order being** **appealed.**

### Date:**2-2-2015 Printed** 

## Name:**Cynthia D,** **Lewis, CSR** **Titie: official** **court reporter** **Rev. 1.8.14**
Rule: State Wyoming State Agency Department of Environmental Quality Affected Area EPA-approved source specific requirements Regulation Black Hills Power and Light Rule Number

. Rule Title Order containing schedule for compliance, interim requirements, and monitoring and reporting requirements. State Effective Date 04/25/1979 State Adoption Date

EPA Effective Date 08/01/1979 Notice of Final Rule Date 07/02/1979 Notice of Final Rule Citation 44 FR 38473 Comments

(d) Black Hills PandL (4

-25

- 1979).pdfRule: State Wyoming State Agency Department of Environmental Quality Affected Area EPA-approved source specific requirements Regulation FMC Corporation Rule Number

. Rule Title Order containing schedule for compliance, interim requirements, and monitoring and reporting requirements. State Effective Date 04/25/1979 State Adoption Date

EPA Effective Date 08/01/1979 Notice of Final Rule Date 07/02/1979 Notice of Final Rule Citation 44 FR 38473 Comments

(d) FMC Corp (4

-25

- 1979).pdf
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-13-01000-CV

Contractors Source, Inc. 

v.

Amegy Bank National Association d/b/a Amegy Bank of Texas

NO. 2012-53936 IN THE 157TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

SUPP CLK RECORD

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

STATEWIDE EFILING

FILING

E-TXGOV FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$540.00

$20.00

$175.00

$5.00

$5.00

03/04/2014

01/21/2014

01/10/2014

12/16/2013

12/13/2013

12/13/2013

11/25/2013

11/21/2013

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$775.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 
hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this April 17, 2015.