alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

Date: May 7, 2013

MEMORANDUM

TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0542

SUBJECT: Meeting with the Ministry of Trade for the Republic of Indonesia

On May 7, 2013, EPA met with a delegation from Indonesia led by Astrid Sri Haryati, 

Special Staff to the Minister of Trade for the Republic of Indonesia. Ms. Haryati asked about 

EPA’s rule making process and discussed the importance of environmental issues to the 

government of Indonesia, at all levels. She also discussed upcoming meetings that Indonesia is 

hosting in 2013, including meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation in October and a 

World Trade Organization meeting in December. EPA provided an update informing the 

delegation that the Agency continues to carefully review the comments received on the January

2012 Notice of Data Availability (NODA) concerning palm oil biofuels.

Delegation from Indonesia:

1. Astrid Haryati, Ministry of Trade

2. Mohammad Benyamin Scott Carnadi, Embassy of Indonesia

3. Ni Made Ayu Marthini, Embassy of Indonesia

4. Febby Andryananto, Embassy of Indonesia

EPA Participants:

1. Karl Simon, Office of Air and Radiation (OAR)

2. Sharyn Lie, OAR

3. Aaron Levy, OAR

4. Karen Orehowsky, OAR

5. Mark Kasman, Office of International and Tribal Affairs

6. Steve Wolfson, Office of General Counsel (OGC)

State Department Participants:

1. Paul Guertin, Indonesia Desk Officer
#### Barbara Swanson et al., Respondents, v Estate of Walter L. Von Langendorff, Deceased, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered October 19, 1990, which, *inter alia,*denied the Estate’s, Evyan Perfumes’ and Leona M. Robison’s ("defendants”) motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Evyan Perfumes, was owned by Walter Langer Von Langendorff. Upon his death, the shares of Evyan passed to his estate. John Paul Reiner, an attorney for Evyan, and Leona Robison, an executive of Evyan, were named co-executors of the estate.

Once it was decided that Evyan was to be sold, Robison allegedly orally promised plaintiffs, employees of Evyan, that if they remained with the company until its sale they would receive a years severance pay and a six month extension of medical coverage. However, just before Evyan’s sale, a memorandum was circulated which informed those Evyan employees who had decided to stay until the sale that they would only receive a bonus equal to 5 *Vi*weeks pay.

Plaintiffs thus began this lawsuit against defendants for, *inter alia,*breach of oral contract and fraudulent inducement. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was denied.

While defendants argue that ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974; 29 USC § 1001*et seq.)*is preemptive and bars plaintiffs’ claims, ERISA does not apply to the instant situation. The alleged oral promise by Robison for severance pay and extended medical coverage, apparently a one-time deal, does not constitute an "employee benefit plan” pursuant to ERISA. (29 USC § 1144 [a]; *and see, Fort Halifax Packing Co. v Coyne,*482 US 1.) There was never any estab*515lished severance pay policy nor an intention to create a plan or a program.

Defendants also claim that under State law, Robison’s alleged promise could not bind the estate without the other co-executor’s agreement. However, there is a question of fact as to whether Robison made the promise while acting in the capacity of an executive of Evyan (and thus the other co-executor’s ratification was clearly unnecessary) or in the capacity of a fiduciary of the estate. While Robison may also attempt to shield herself from personal liability pursuant to EPTL 11-4.7, such insulation is only effective if her promise was made while administering the estate. At this point, this cannot be resolved on the record. Accordingly, summary judgment was appropriately denied.

We have considered all other claims and find them to be of no merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ELLIS D. THOMAS, JR.
, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )

v. ) Civil Action No. 2 3

- 0106 (UNA) ) D.C. LAW ENFORCEMENT
, et al.
, ) ) Defendan t s

. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and

his pro se complaint. The Court will GRANT the application and, for the reasons stated below,
DISMISS the complaint.
The Court is mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent
standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner , 404

U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure. Jarr ell v. Tisch , 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the
grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of t he claim
showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader
seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice
to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to
prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies.
Brown v. Califano
, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Plaintiff alleges that defendant Thomas

- Smith has made false reports about him to
various police forces in the Washington, D.C. area over the course of 20 years, and that2

defendant Lindsey is responsible for “never ending entrapment techniques” and “[t]err orizing
[plaintiff] at [his ] jobs, relationships, etc.” Compl. at 4. Further
, he alleges he has been
assaulted physically “ multiple times over the years” “ by multiple officers ” assigned to various
divisions of the Metropolitan Poli ce Department. See id. at 5. For the injuries allegedly
sustained, plaintiff demands an award of $7,750,000. See id.
As drafted, this complaint runs afoul of Rule 8(a). What few factual allegations plaintiff
makes are far too vague to put any defendan t on notice of plaintiff’s legal claims. It is not
enough, for example, that defendants are “depriving [plaintiff] of a job” or harassing, stalking,
and retaliating against him, Compl. at 4, without identifying specific incidents or explaining how

and whe n defendants have caused plaintiff harm.
The Court will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss
the complaint. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE: January 25, 2023 /s/ CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER United States District Judge
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00891-CR

Donald F. HUFF,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR2990

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED to the trial court for a new trial. 

SIGNED April 8, 2015.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
391 A.2d 705

#### Commonwealth v. Wright, Appellant.

Submitted December 6, 1977.

Robert B. Mozenter, for appellant; Michael R. Stiles, Assistant District Attorney, and F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGIONIII_______1650ArchStreetPhiladelphia,Pennsylvania19103-2029JUN262012TheHonorableCollinO’Mara,SecretaryDelawareDepartmentofNaturalResourcesandEnvironmentalControl89KingsHighwayDover,Delaware19901DearMr.O’Mara:OnMarch23,2012,theEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyreceivedarevisiontotheDelawareStateImplementationPlan(SIP)fromtheDelawareDepartmentofNaturalResourcesandEnvironmentalControlpertainingtonewsourcereviewpermittingtoaddressnationalambientairqualitystandardsforparticulatematterlessthan2.5micrometers.EPAhasdeterminedthatthesubmittalisadministrativelyandtechnicallycomplete,andisreviewingittoprepareaNoticeofProposedRulemaking(NPR)action.Ifmembersofyourstaffhaveanyquestions,theymaydirectthemtoMs.GerallynDuke,OfficeofPermitsandAirToxics,at(215)814-2084.Sheistheprincipalcontactforthisrulemaking.Sincerely,DianaEsher,DirectorAirProtectionDivisionCustomerServiceHotline:1-800-438-2474
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              95
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      814
<ALLOWANCES>                                        57
<INVENTORY>                                        222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,410
<PP&E>                                          21,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,578
<BONDS>                                          1,243
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,662
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,187
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,485
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  99
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,640
<INCOME-TAX>                                       628
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,012
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,012
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALFONSO MOUZON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

PAM AHLIN, Ex-Executive Director of

Coalinga State Hospital; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-16261

D.C. No. 1:13-cv-00143-GSA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Gary S. Austin, Magistrate Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted April 7, 2015*** 

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

California civil detainee Alfonso Mouzon appeals pro se from the district

FILED

APR 15 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** Mouzon consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(c).

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging his civil confinement

under California’s Sexually Violent Predators Act (“SVPA”). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Huftile v. Miccio-Fonseca, 410 F.3d 1136, 1138 (9th

Cir. 2005). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Hartmann v.

Cal. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab., 707 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2013). We affirm. 

The district properly dismissed Mouzon’s claim for prospective injunctive

relief because he failed to allege facts sufficient to show that the SVPA’s postcommitment procedures deprived him of due process. See Portman v. County of

Santa Clara, 995 F.2d 898, 904 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth elements of a § 1983

procedural due process claim); see also Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 6608(a) (“A

person who has been committed as a sexually violent predator shall be permitted to

petition the court for conditional release with or without the recommendation or

concurrence of the Director of State Hospitals.”). 

Dismissal of Mouzon’s claims for damages and declaratory relief was proper

because a judgment in Mouzon’s favor would necessarily imply the invalidity of

his SVPA civil commitment. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994)

(§ 1983 claims that necessarily challenge the fact or duration of confinement are

barred unless the conviction or sentence has been invalidated); Huftile, 410 F.3d at

2 14-16261
1139-41, 1142 (applying Heck to civilly committed sex offenders and noting that a

dismissal under Heck is without prejudice). 

We do not consider Mouzon’s ex post facto argument because it was not

properly raised below. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir.

2009) (per curiam). 

AFFIRMED.

3 14-16261
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BOOMERS CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. (the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I, Lorena Jensen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: July 14, 2005                 /s/ Lorena Jensen

---------------------------



Lorena Jensen



Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

TERRANCE BERNARD ROBINSON,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 75 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 22, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00260

- CV

ONE (1) 1992 CHEVROLET PK, VIN. 1GCEC14Z4NE164549, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texa s

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 13890 Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant has filed in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. However, appellant has not established indigence pursuant to rule 20.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. We therefore hold the motion in abeyance and order appellant to file , by May 2, 2014, either the certificate described in Rule 20.1(a)(1) or an affidavit of indigence that complies with the requirements of rule 20.1(b).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of April, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of C ourt
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1318 

To direct the Librarian of Congress to obtain a stained glass panel depicting 

the seal of the District of Columbia and install the panel among the 

stained glass panels depicting the seals of States which overlook the 

Main Reading Room of the Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson Building. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2019 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Librarian of Congress to obtain a stained 

glass panel depicting the seal of the District of Columbia 

and install the panel among the stained glass panels 

depicting the seals of States which overlook the Main 

Reading Room of the Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson Building. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1318 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCLUDING STAINED GLASS PANEL DEPICTING 

2 SEAL OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN LIBRARY 

3 OF CONGRESS THOMAS JEFFERSON BUILD4 ING. 

5 The Librarian of Congress shall obtain a stained 

6 glass panel depicting the seal of the District of Columbia 

7 and install the panel among the panels depicting the seals 

8 of States which overlook the Main Reading Room of the 

9 Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson Building, concur10 rently with the renovation and replacement of the existing 

11 glass panels. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
ACCEPTED

06-15-00014-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

4/8/2015 5:09:25 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/9/2015 8:49:00 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E.
      Eugene Sharer, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





/s/
                E. Eugene SharerE.
                Eugene SharerInterim
                Principal Financial Officer





March
      10,
      2008
CLYDE&COUSLLPTheChiyslerBuUding405LedngtonAvenueNewYorkNewYork10174Telephone:2127103900Facsimile:2127103950w.clydeco.usandrew.harakas@clydeco.usMay25,2010VIAEMAILMr.PaulL.GretchDirectorOfficeofInternationalAviationDepartmentofTransportationRoomW86-3161200NewJerseyAvenue,SEWashington,DC20590Re:ApplicationofAegeanAirlinesSocieteAnonymeDocketDOT-OST-2010-0131DearMr.Gretch:Wehavepolledthecarriersontheservicelistfortheabove-referencedapplicationandhavereceivednon-objectionsfromallU.S.carriersserved.Promptapprovaloftheapplicationisrequested.Sincerelyyours,AndrewJ.HarakCounselforAegeanAirlinesSocieteAnonymed/b/aAegeanAirlinesS.A.AJH/msCc:RobertFinamore,MaryStreet,GeorgeWellingtonAllPartiesontheattachedServiceListDocketDOT-OST-2010-0131Clyde&CoUSLLPisaDelawarelimitedliabilitypartnershipwithofficesinNewYork,SanFranciscoandNewJersey.Clyde&CoUSLU’isaffiliatedwithClyde&CoLLP,alimitedliabilitypartnershipregisteredinEnglandandWalesthatpracticesfrombranchandaffiliate*officesin:AbuDhabi,Baagalore*,Belgrade*,Caracas,DnresSalaam,Doha,Dubai,Gtsildford,HongKong,London,Moscow,Mumbai*,Nantes,Paris,Piraeus,RiodeJaneiro,Riyadh*,Shanghai,SingaporeandSt.Petersburg*219616v1CLYDE&COUSLLPMr.PaulGretchMay25,2010Page2ServiceListmsinick@ssd.cornnssparks@fedex.corncarl.nelson@aa.cornanbird@fedex.comrpommeratIasair.corndavid.heffernan@wilrnerhale.comsascha.vanderbellen@delta.cornjeffrey.manley©united.cornjeff.morgandeIta.cornrnatwood@sherblackwell.cornsarnetta.c.barnett@delta.cornkevin.rnontgornerypoIaraircargo.comchartersevergreenairIines.comdvaughankelleydrye.cornslachter@Iachter-clements.cornrnlbengezsrlaw.cornagoerIichggh-airIaw.cornbill@rnietuslaw.comhoward.kassusairways.comwilliarn.stallingsusdoj.govbenjarnin.sIocumusairways.corndwight.rnoore@ustranscom.miljrichardson@johnlrichardson.corndan.weiss@coair.cornhershel.kamen@coair.cornlhalloway©crowell.com
£3,0 3W-0f,o^s

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 10 2015

^bei-AcostarGlerkV-Vxa^ \S_^uJ>-a^x-cxA:\Ae, b>£>wei^

Ql\A& •=Sj^a^~£-JCJL^a \N>xj>ju£ ^SjLJsJW^

SjCAlV ^^a^ Vj^o^ ^p-VV^j ^fi_JljQ(J^-_U|/>," U^w_

\W- Qy-9-g- *Xfe Aoefx> -j&U*- S'o Hiucu iCU^i^^^^

^JUL^L. ^i\z_L\A^ (X ^C\V OVlc^^^Xih ^Qa^—Ul^-

^QpNV- •V> "^W PaXL/v S>Qvc) vx<^ rp^<V V^hYv A*

i^L Coo^^N C&C Cl^u \lo^V A_\c^f VV^c^^WHr Q^_
-CJyVqvAcNj^^^Cja^ — . "' --y^—^~--—— ==»— \:- \j0^q\A-__\Ajln^^ — —~—. —. ^>W^r 7——-'—— = ^

O^^Va^o rfyA v/y,1-^ S.VxqV e^ox Pu-g/v Lvs W^ii^

VQr ^ao^ \vWv. u\<j*s/L V^\.<p VW- Qj'V V*cVi W^bi.

__ H G©^ A^U5^> ^— " '
And it came to pass in those days

that Jesus came from Nazareth of

Galilee, and was baptized of John

in Jordan*1 (Mark 1:9)

«-^- etec&emee £&ea& ^S&vd^ybiuA ^AvM, taa& "Sorted'w&k Sfiffin, in, 6ap86m,

On,rie<^ dcutof A^ril

€*$££&%%&

*Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,

baptizing them in the name ofthe

Father, and ofthe Son, and of the

Holy Ghost" (Matthew 28:19)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9933]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, April 
26, 2012 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
April 26, 2012 will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings; and
    An opinion.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: April 19, 2012.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9933 Filed 4-20-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P