alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 25 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit 

the number of terms a Representative or Senator may serve. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. BYRNE (for himself and Mr. BARR) submitted the following joint 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to limit the number of terms a Representative 

or Senator may serve. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 25 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person who has been a Senator for 

3 two terms shall again be eligible for election or appoint4 ment to the Senate. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person who has been a Representa6 tive for six terms shall again be eligible for election to the 

7 House of Representatives. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 3. For the purposes of this article, any 

9 term that began before the date of the ratification of this 

10 article shall not be included in determining the number 

11 of terms that a person has been a Senator or Representa12 tive.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1293 

To prohibit the use of amounts appropriated for military construction or 

the Army Corps of Engineers for the construction of barriers, land 

acquisition, or any other associated activities on the southern border 

without specific statutory authorization from Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. VELA (for himself, Mr. VARGAS, and Mr. LUJA ́N) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of amounts appropriated for military 

construction or the Army Corps of Engineers for the 

construction of barriers, land acquisition, or any other 

associated activities on the southern border without specific statutory authorization from Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1293 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restrictions Against 

3 Illegitimate Declarations for Emergency Re-appropria4 tions Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘RAIDER Act of 2019’’. 

5 SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON USE OF EMERGENCY FUNDS FOR 

6 CONSTRUCTION OF BARRIERS OR LAND SEI7 ZURE ALONG THE SOUTHERN BORDER. 

8 Notwithstanding section 201 of the National Emer9 gencies Act of 1976 (50 U.S.C. 1621), section 2808 of 

10 title 10, United States Code, section 923 of the Water Re11 sources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2293), or 

12 any other provision of law, no funds appropriated or other13 wise made available prior to the date of the enactment 

14 of this Act may be used for the construction of barriers, 

15 land acquisition, or any other associated activities on the 

16 southern border without specific statutory authorization 

17 from Congress. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of FAO, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending August 2, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerome A. Kollar, Senior Vice President-Financeof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  September 15, 2003 |                            | /s/  Jerome A. Kollar |   |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                           | Jerome  A. Kollar               |                  |
|                           | Senior  Vice President-Finance  |                  |
|                           | (Principal  Accounting Officer) |                  |

 

----
#### Ronald Eugene JOHNSON, Appellant, STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 4104.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

June 8, 1979.

John W. Hagey, Asst. Public Defender, Fairbanks, Brian C. Shortell, Public Defender, Anchorage, for appellant.

Rhonda F. Butterfield, Asst. Dist. Atty., Harry L. Davis, Dist. Atty., Fairbanks, Av-rum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for ap-pellee.

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CON-NOR, BOOCHEVER, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced to a prison term of fifteen years for the crime of shooting with intent to kill or wound in violation of AS 11.15.150. The underlying facts show that the shooting was a premeditated attempt to kill a witness to an alleged act of statutory rape committed by the appellant. In view of the gravity of the offense we do not believe that the superior court was clearly mistaken in imposing the sentence it did. Nor do we feel that it was error on the superior court’s part to have failed to recommend treatment of Johnson for alcoholism.

AFFIRMED.
(a)  A review of Exeter Finance LLC’s activities
            and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2022 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Exeter Holdings Trust 2022-3, EFCAR, LLC, Exeter Finance LLC, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”),
            Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-3, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and backup servicer, during the period from June 22, 2022 to December 31, 2022 has been made under my supervision.
 
 (b)  To the best of my knowledge,
        based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.
 
   By:  /s/ Ben Miller
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT








I, Ryan M. Hershberger, certify that:





(a)    A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from November 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 has been made under my supervision.





(b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.








Dated March 19, 2024


/s/ Ryan M. HershbergerRyan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2023-C
April 15, 2015

Lisa Matz Via ProDoc E-File

Clerk, Fifth Court of Appeals

600 Commerce Street, Suite 200

Dallas, Texas 75202

Re: Case No. 05-13-01700-CV; Orca Assets, G.P., L.L.C. v. JPMorgan Chase 

Bank, N.A., et al.

Dear Ms. Matz:

Pursuant to the Court’s instruction, please be advised that I will present 

oral argument on behalf of the Appellant Orca Assets, G.P., L.L.C. on 

Wednesday, April 22, 2015, at 11:00 a.m.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

 Very truly yours,

 WARE, JACKSON, LEE & CHAMBERS, L.L.P.

 By: /S/ Timothy F. Lee 

 Timothy F. Lee

TFL:lb

cc: Jessica B. Pulliam Via ProDoc E-File

Stephanie F. Cagniart

 Baker Botts LLP 

2001 Ross Ave., Suite 600

Dallas, Texas 75201

ACCEPTED

05-13-01700-CV

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

4/15/2015 11:22:55 AM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 4/15/2015 11:22:55 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
Lisa Matz, Clerk

April 15, 2015

Page 2

Deborah Hankinson Via ProDoc E-File

Stephanie D. Nelson

Hankinson LLP

750 North St. Paul Street, Suite 1800

Dallas, Texas 75201

James G. Bennett Via ProDoc E-File

H. Allen Pennington

Pennington Hill, LLP

Tindall Square – Warehouse No. 3

509 Pecan Street, Suite 101

Fort Worth, Texas 76102
#### In the Matter of Paul Garvin, Appellant, v County of Erie, Respondent.

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. *1055Memorandum: The court did not abuse its discretion in denying claimant’s motion for leave to file a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5). Claimant failed to prove that the County had actual notice of the incident upon which his claim is based *(see, Wencek v County of Chautauqua,*132 AD2d 950, 951; *cf., Matter of Jakubowicz v Dunkirk Urban Renewal Agency,*75 AD2d 1019), nor did he provide any excuse for the delay in filing his notice of claim *(see, Baehre v County of Erie,*94 AD2d 943). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J.—Late Notice of Claim.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS








I, Jason C. Behnke, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2023-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.





Date:  March 20, 2024


/s/ Jason C. BehnkeJason C. BehnkeVice President - Assistant TreasurerFord Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer(senior officer in charge of servicing function)
Attachment 1 

AMS Directive 4720.1 

4/26/04 

TARGETED DISABILITIES 

1. Hearing Impairments: 

a. Total deafness in both ears, with understandable speech 

b. Total deafness in both ears, and unable to speak clearly 

2. Vision Impairments: 

a. Inability to read ordinary size print, not correctable by glasses (can 

read oversized print or use assisting devices such as magnifiers) 

b. Blind in both eyes (no usable vision, but may have some light 

perception) 

3. Missing Extremities: 

a. One leg 

b. Both hands and arms

c. Both feet and legs 

d. One hand or arm or one foot or leg 

e. One hand or arm or both feet or legs 

f. Both hands or arms or one foot or leg 

g. Both hands or arms or both feet or legs 

4. Partial Paralysis: 

a. Because of a brain, nerve, or muscle problem, including palsy and 

cerebral palsy, there is some loss of ability to move or use a part of 

the body, including legs, arms and/or trunk 

b. Both hands 

c. Both legs, any part 

d. Both arms, any part 

e. One side of the body, including one arm and one leg 

f. Two or more major parts of the body (arms, legs, etc.)

1
2

Attachment 1 

AMS Directive 4720.1 

4/26/04 

5. Paralysis: 

a. Because of a brain, nerve, or muscle problem, including palsy and 

cerebral palsy, there is a complete loss of ability to move or use a 

part of the body, including legs, arms and/or trunk 

b. One arm 

c. Both arms 

d. One leg 

e. Both legs 

f. Lower half of the body, including legs 

g. One side of the body, including one arm and one leg 

h. Three or more major parts of the body (arms and legs)

6. Other Impairments: 

a. Convulsive disorder (such as epilepsy) 

b. Mental retardation (a chronic and lifetime condition involving a 

limited ability to learn and to be trained for useful productive 

employment as certified by a State Vocational Rehabilitation 

agency under section 213.3102(t) of Schedule A) 

c. Mental or emotional illness (a history of treatment for mental or 

emotional problems) 

d. Severe distortion of limbs and/or spine (for example dwarfism, 

kyphosis [severe distortion of back])
Agricultural Marketing Service

1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-0201

www.ams.usda.gov

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

LMR Swine & Pork Stakeholder Meeting Agenda

Federal Mediation & Conciliation Service

250 E Street, SW

7th Floor

Washington, DC 20427

March 21-22, 2017

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

8:00 – 8:30 am Welcome & Introductions Mike Lynch

LPGMN Director

8:30 – 9:30 am Review Role of Facilitators, Federal Mediation &

Procedural Ground Rules, Problem Conciliation Service (FMCS)

Solving Strategies, and Agenda

9:30 – 10:00 am Stakeholder Expectations FMCS

10:00 – 10:15 am Break

10:15 – 11:30 am Confidentiality in Swine & Pork Reporting AMS

11:30 am – 1:00 pm Lunch

1:00 – 2:45 pm Marketing Methods & Purchase Types Group Discussion

• Negotiated

• Negotiated Formula

• Swine & Pork Formulas

• Other Market Formulas

• Other Purchase Arrangements

2:45 – 3:00 pm Break

3:00 – 5:00 pm Marketing Methods & Purchase Types Group Discussion
Agricultural Marketing Service

1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-0201

www.ams.usda.gov

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

8:00 – 9:00 am Sow & Boar Reporting Group Discussion

9:00 – 10:00 am Wholesale Pork Reporting & Cutout Group Discussion

10:00 – 10:15 am Break

10:15 – 11:30 am Wholesale Pork Reporting & Cutout Group Discussion

11:30 am – 1:00 pm Lunch

1:00 – 2:30 pm What Improvements Should AMS Group Discussion

Consider Implementing Now?

2:30 – 2:45 pm Break

2:45 – 3:30 pm Review All Topics & Issues Group Discussion

3:30 – 4:00 pm Wrap-up and Next Steps Mike Lynch

Organizations Represented:

American Farm Bureau Federation – Katelyn McCullock

CME Group – David Lehman, Megan Agruso

Livestock Marketing Information Center – Dr. Joe Parcell

National Farmers Union – Barbara Patterson

National Pork Producers Council – Brian Stevens, Greg Howard

North American Meat Institute – Bob Darrell
USDA’s Winning on Reducing Food Waste Initiative

USDA specialty crops marketing orders can help reduce food waste while increasing producer returns by allowing the 

industry to give fruits and vegetables to secondary markets 

when items don’t meet quality standards but are still 

edible. 

As part of the Winning on Reducing Food Waste 

Initiative, the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)

Specialty Crops Program (SCP) encourages all importers 

of fruits, vegetables and specialty crops to help reduce 

food loss and waste by registering to donate with food 

banks and charitable organizations across the United 

States.

The Florida Citrus Marketing Order and the IdahoEastern Oregon Potato Marketing Order offer prime 

examples of how marketing orders reduce food waste and 

provide consumers with a supply of consistently high-quality product via secondary markets:

Florida Citrus Marketing Order – All distorted, off-sized, blemished and immature Florida citrus fruit are 

separated for secondary markets. Most of the fruits that fail grade-required standards during sorting are 

processed into orange and grapefruit juice. About 5% to 10% of such fruit is sold to roadside vendors or donated 

to local charities and food banks.

Idaho-Eastern Oregon Potato Marketing Order – Potatoes meeting the highest quality standards are called No.1 

potatoes – which appear in produce aisles. Meanwhile, No. 2 potatoes are most often sent to restaurants for 

fresh-cut fries. Of the potatoes that enter the packing shed, 65% fit into the No. 1 or No. 2 category. The 

remaining 35% are processed mostly into dehydrated potatoes, fries or hash browns. 

SCP’s Marketing Order and Agreement Division (MOAD) administers 29 federal marketing orders. About half of them 

have Section 8e import requirements for product imported from other countries. If imported fruit, vegetables or

specialty crops fail to meet Section 8e import requirements, the importer of record has options for the proper 

disposition of the lot. With help from importers, the Winning on Reducing Food Waste Initiative can turn what might 

otherwise be millions of tons of wasted food into nutritional fuel for America’s communities and economy.

More information about filing for SC-6 exemption certificates for donating product to foodbanks and charitable 

organizations is available in an educational video on the USDA-AMS YouTube channel.

You can also call MOAD’s customer service line – 1-888-551-3523 – for more details on how marketing orders support 

the USDA Winning on Reducing Food Waste Initiative.
Formal Recommendation by the 

National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) 

to the National Organic Program (NOP)

Date: December 2, 2011

Subject: Ozone gas: Listing at §205.601 for Sunset 2013 

Chair: Tracy Miedema

 

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action

 

Statement of the Recommendation (Including Recount of Vote): 

The board voted to relist ozone gas to §205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for 

use in organic crop production.

(a) as algaecide, disinfectants, sanitizers, including irrigation system cleaners

(5) Ozone gas- for use as an irrigation system cleaner only. 

The vote was 13 yes and 1 no. 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with 

OFPA and NOP): 

The Crops Committee recommendation is attached. Public comment favored 

continued listing and no new information has come to light. General agreement

within the committee that it is a good alternative to chlorine for this use.

NOSB Vote:

Moved: John Foster Second: Tina Ellor

Yes: 13 No: 1 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recusal: 0
National Organic Standards Board

Crops Committee

2013 Sunset Final Recommendation

Ozone

December 2, 2011

List: §205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production.

(a) As algicide, disinfectants, and sanitizer, including irrigation system cleaning 

systems. 

(5) Ozone gas—for use as irrigation system cleaner only.

Committee Summary 

There was a broad consensus in the organic community at the last round of sunset for 

this use of ozone that it should be kept on the list. There has been no new information 

since that time and it was generally agreed within the committee that it is a good 

alternative to chlorine for this use.

Committee Recommendation

The Crops Committee recommends relisting Ozone gas on 205.601 (a) As algicide, 

disinfectants, and sanitizer, including irrigation system cleaning systems. (5) Ozone 

gas—for use as irrigation system cleaner only.

NOSB Vote 

Motion: John Foster Second: Tina Ellor

Yes: 13 No: 1 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recuse: 0
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 107 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 107

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2021, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2021 (division A of Public Law 116-159) is further 
amended by striking

              

 the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ``December 20, 
2020''.
     This joint resolution may be cited as the ``Further Additional 
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 18, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 107

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2021, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
391 A.2d 685

#### Commonwealth v. Howell, Appellant.

Submitted March 13,1978.

Arthur K. Dils, and Dils, Diveglia & Radcliff, for appellant; Marion E. MacIntyre, Second Assistant District Attorney, and LeRoy S. Zimmerman, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
June 11, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SILVESTRE CORTEZ ROMERO, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00674-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and 

having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment 

requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is 

capeable of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is MODIFIED, to 

delete the specific amount of court costs.

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.