alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

              Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
            Securities and Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Richard Cohen, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ABC Funding,
Inc.

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
and

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Dated: February 1, 2007               By: /s/ Richard Cohen
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Richard Cohen, Chief Financial Officer
                                          ABC Funding, Inc.
10-K
| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or                15(d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                that |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March              27, 2008 |   | /s/Paul              N. Wojcik               |
|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Date                   |   | Chairman              and Chief Executive Officer |

----
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT (10)(b)


                        OPINION AND CONSENT OF ACTUARY
<PAGE>

               [Transamerica Life Insurance Company Letterhead]

April 10, 2002


Transamerica Life Insurance Company
4333 Edgewood Road NE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa  52499-0001

Re:    Principal-Plus Variable Annuity
       Separate Account VA I
       Registration on Form N-4; SEC File No. 333-46594

Dear Sir/Madam:

With regard to the above registration statement, I have examined such documents
and made such inquiries as I have deemed necessary and appropriate, and on the
basis of such examination, have the following opinions:

Fees and charges deducted under the Principal-Plus Variable Annuity policies are
those deemed necessary to appropriately reflect:

(1)    the expenses incurred in the acquisition and distribution of the
       policies,

(2)    the expenses associated with the development and servicing of the
       policies,

(3)    the assumption of certain risks arising from the operation and management
       of the policies and/or riders to the policy and that provides for a
       reasonable margin of profit.

Fees and charges assessed against the policy values in the variable account
include:

(i)    Service Charge and Administrative Charge

(ii)   Mortality and Expense Risk Fee (M&E)

(iii)  Taxes (including premium and other taxes if applicable)

(iv)   Surrender Charges

(v)    Any applicable rider fees or charges
<PAGE>

Transamerica Life Insurance Company
April 10, 2002
Page 2



The magnitude of each of the individual charges listed above in (i) through (v)
is established in the pricing of the Principal-Plus Variable Annuity, to achieve
a reasonable Return on Investment (ROI), which is within the range of industry
practice with respect to comparable variable annuity products.

Except by coincidence, it is not expected that actual charges assessed in a
given year would exactly offset actual expenses incurred.  Acquisition expenses
(as well as major product and/or systems development expenses) are incurred "up
front" and recovered, with a reasonable profit margin, through future years'
charges.  In addition, the company cannot increase certain charges under the
policies in the pricing process.

Therefore, in my opinion, the fees and charges deducted under the policies, in
the aggregate, are reasonable in relation to the services rendered, the expenses
expected to be incurred, and the risks assumed by the company.

I hereby consent to the use of this opinion, which is included as an Exhibit to
the registration statement.



/s/ R. Gene Hauser
-------------------------------------
R. Gene Hauser
Associate Actuary
Transamerica Life Insurance Company
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/State Street Collective
Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Beth M. Halberstadt, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Beth M. HalberstadtBeth M. HalberstadtChief Financial OfficerMay 15, 2008
Exhibit 12.1   NSTAR Electric Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Year Ended December 31, 2009 (in thousands)   Net income from continuing operations$240,691Less: equity income from investees891Plus: distributed income of equity investees1,661Income taxes151,224Fixed charges (including securitization certificates)84,824Total$477,509Interest expense$77,497Interest component of rentals (estimated as one-third of rental expense)7,327Total$84,824Ratio of earnings to fixed charges5.63     Exhibit 12.2   NSTAR Electric Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements Year Ended December 31, 2009 (in thousands)    Net income from continuing operations (before preferred stock dividend)$240,691Less: equity income from investees891Plus: distributed income of equity investees1,661Income taxes151,224Fixed charges (including securitization certificates)84,824Total$477,509Interest expense$77,497Interest component of rentals (estimated as one-third of rental expense)7,327Subtotal84,824Preferred stock dividend requirements3,191Total$88,015Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividend requirements5.43
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 31, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 31, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15A1171. LAJOHNIA GREENE v. JACQUELINE BURWELL.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
#### Rebecca Sue EVANS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-79-36.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 3, 1980.

Wesley R. Thompson, Sapulpa, for appellant.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., David W. Lee, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

OPINION

BRETT, Judge:

The appellant, Rebecca Sue Evans, pled guilty to the crime of Harboring a Fugitive from Justice, but the imposition of judgment and sentence was deferred for eighteen (18) months. Upon a motion filed by the District Attorney to accelerate the imposition of judgment and sentence, a hearing was held in the District Court in Creek County, Case No. CRF-77-206. The District "Court, the Honorable Lester D. Henderson presiding, sustained the motion to *785accelerate after finding that the appellant had materially violated the conditions of her probation by commission of a burglary, Case No. CRF-78-76. The appellant was committed to the custody of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections for a term of two (2) years. Thereafter, on April 20, 1979, the District Court in Creek County, the Honorable Clyde T. Patrick presiding, dismissed burglary charges against the appellant at the conclusion of the preliminary hearing in Case No. CRF-78-76, for failure of the State to show that a crime had been committed.

In an acceleration of a deferred sentence the State has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that one of the conditions of probation has been violated. *Beller v. State,*Okl.Cr., 597 P.2d 338 (1979). While this is not the same degree required in a conviction, when an acceleration is founded upon a probationer’s criminal conduct, it must, at least, rest upon a prima facie case of the commission of that crime. The only allegation in the motion to accelerate sentencing, which the State attempted to prove in the motion hearing of August 1, 1978, was that the appellant did in fact commit a burglary, CRF-78-76. However, that burglary was not established at the acceleration hearing of August 1, 1978, because the State failed to present sufficient evidence to prove that the appellant had committed the crime of burglary.

Therefore, it is the opinion of this Court that the order accelerating the imposition of judgment and sentence in Case No. CRF—77-206 is *REVERSED.*

CORNISH, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.
**Exhibit 21** **SUBSIDIARIES    OF THE COMPANY**     Listed below are the significant subsidiaries of the Company and    their jurisdictions of organization. All are wholly-owned. Other    subsidiaries have been omitted because, considered in the    aggregate, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary.      **Name of Subsidiary** **Organization**  Bowne & Co., Inc.           Delaware Bowne Business Communications,    Inc.           New York Bowne Enterprise Solutions, LLC          New York Bowne International de Mexico,    S.A. de C.V.           Mexico Bowne International Holdings GmbH          Switzerland Bowne International, LLC           Delaware Bowne International, Ltd.           United Kingdom Bowne International, SAS           France Bowne Japan & Co,    Inc.           Japan Bowne MBC, LLC           Delaware Bowne of Atlanta, Inc.           Georgia Bowne of Boston, Inc.           Massachusetts Bowne of Canada, Ltd.           Ontario, Canada Bowne of Chicago, Inc.           Delaware Bowne of Cleveland, Inc.           Ohio Bowne of Dallas Limited    Partnership           Delaware Bowne of Europe, B.V.           Netherlands Bowne of Gibraltar B.V.           Netherlands Bowne of Los Angeles, Inc.           California Bowne of New York City, LLC           New York Bowne of Phoenix, Inc.           Arizona Bowne of South Bend, Inc.           Delaware Bowne of the Netherlands B.V.           Netherlands Bowne SI, Inc.          Pennsylvania Bowne Solutions, LLC          Delaware Bowne Technology Enterprise,    LLC           New York
**Exhibit 35.2**

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

​

I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Finance Director of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

​

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from October 30, 2023 through October 27, 2024 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 2, 2023 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2023 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

​

| ​                | ​                     | ​                                    |
|------------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 10, 2025 | Deere Credit Services, Inc. |
| ​                | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​                | By:                         | */s/ Steven N. Owenson*                    |
| ​                | ​                     | Steven N. Owenson                          |
| ​                | ​                     | Senior Vice President and Finance Director |
| ​                | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​                | ​                     | ​                                    |

​

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1144 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1144

   To prohibit the use of funds during a lapse in appropriations to 
       support congressional delegations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2019

Mr. Gallagher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the use of funds during a lapse in appropriations to 
       support congressional delegations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No CODELs During Shutdowns Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

    (a) Prohibition.--An executive agency may not expend any funds for 
the purpose of supporting official travel undertaken by more than one 
Member of Congress during any period in which there is a lapse in 
appropriations for any instrumentality of the Federal Government.
    (b) Exception.--An executive agency may expend funds for the 
purpose described under subsection (a) if the President, in 
consultation with the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Majority leader of the Senate, waives the prohibition under such 
subsection for such purpose.
    (c) Executive Agency Defined.--The term ``executive agency'' has 
the meaning given that term in section 133 of title 41, United States 
Code.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
21.1**
 
 **List
of Subsidiaries**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 **Name**
    **%
      Ownership**
    **State
      of Incorporation**
    **Status****Nationwide
      Commercial Brokers Corp**
    **100**
    **California**
    **active****Diversified
      Commercial Brokers, LLC**
    **53.8**
    **California**
    **active****Diversified
      Commercial Mortgage, Corp**
    **100**
    **California**
    **inactive****Dickinson
      Management Inc**
    **100**
    **North
      Dakota**
    **inactive****Spencer
      Springs, LLC**
    **63.0**
    **Nevada**
    **active**
SERVED: OCTOBER 26, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -''^'•'WnD^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ':'^R OPEf M 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AIR Z FLYE^G SERVICE, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPIOSWOOIO 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2010-0974 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009SW910051) has been assigned 

to the undersigned. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding 

shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached 

Service List. 

V 

ie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law 

Attachment - Service List 

l i  
FAA Docket No. CPIOSWOOIO 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Laurence E. Rohl, President 

Air Z Flying Service, Inc., Respondent 

355 Richmond Rd., Hangar 5 

Richmond Heights, OH 44143 

TEL: 

FAX: 

Agnes M. Rodriguez, Complainant's Counsel 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Coimsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-7268 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Rormie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 13-531V

Filed: March 23, 2015

Not for Publication

*************************************

BETTINE DELEA, *

*

 Petitioner, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision based on

 * stipulation of fact

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Ronald C. Homer, Boston, MA, for petitioner.

Glenn A. MacLeod, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On March 23, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an 

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. 

Petitioner filed an application for attorneys’ fees and costs on February 19, 2015, seeking 

$19,977.08 in reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. During informal discussions, 

respondent raised objections to certain items in petitioner’s application. Based on these 

objections, petitioner amends her application to request $19,000.00, consisting of $18,347.25 in 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

redact such material from public access.
2

attorneys’ fees and costs and $652.75 in petitioner’s costs. Respondent does not object to this

amount. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards:

a. $18,347.25, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award 

shall be in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and Conway, Homer & 

Chin-Caplan, P.C. in the amount of $18,347.25; and

b. $652.75, representing reimbursement for petitioner’s costs. The award shall be in the 

form of a check payable to petitioner in the amount of $652.75.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 23, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.