alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  HS3  Technologies,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.    The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


Date:  November 21, 2005

/s/ Lougene Baird
----------------------------------

Lougene Baird
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Salvatore DAuria, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Tut Systems Inc., on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Tut Systems, Inc.



Date: June 10, 2004



By:

/s/ Salvatore DAuriaSalvatore DAuria,President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board (Principal Executive Officer)
Order entered October 16 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 0 1078
- CR
ERIC ROSE , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. F11
- 55385
- Y



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant de sires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective repres entation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
      32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. CODE § 1350








The
      undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Burke Mills, Inc., (the “Issuer”) hereby
      certifies that the foregoing periodic report containing financial statements
      of
      the Issuer fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 USC 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
      information contained in the foregoing report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Issuer.





*/s/
                  Humayun N. Shaikh*Date:
                April 12, 2007
              
              Humayun
                  N. ShaikhChairman
                  and CEO(Principal
                  Executive Officer)










CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. CODE § 1350








The
      undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Burke Mills, Inc., (the “Issuer”) hereby
      certifies that the foregoing periodic report containing financial statements
      of
      the Issuer fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 USC 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
      information contained in the foregoing report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Issuer.





*/s/
                    Thomas I. Nail*Date:
                April 12, 2007
              
              Thomas
                    I. NailPresident
                    and COO(Principal
                    Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
              FROM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONDENSED
              CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND NOTES TO CONDENSED
              CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
              ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          30,000
<SECURITIES>                                    33,811
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                       726
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,581
<PP&E>                                          34,975
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,893
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,250
<SALES>                                        142,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,018
<CGS>                                            6,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,437 <F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,910 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,095)<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,518
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,840
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,678
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,678
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
<FN>
<F1>MINORITY INTEREST SHARE OF NET INCOME AND LOSS ON EQUITY JOINT VENTURES
<F2>REPRESENTS NET INTEREST INCOME
<F3>INCLUDES RESTRUCTURING CHARGES OF 5,561,000 (.23 PER DILUTED SHARE)
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, James S. Phalen, as Chief Executive Officer of the American Bar Association Members/ State Street Collective Trust,certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of the American Bar Association Members/ State Street Collective Trust; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 7, 2004
2022 WASHINGTON CHERRY MARKETING COMMITTEE ROSTER 

 

MANAGER: CHAIRPERSON: 

B. J. Thurlby Kevin Stennes

Washington Cherry Marketing Committee Phone: (506) 733-2195

105 South 18th Street, #205 Email: kevins@chelanfresh.com

Yakima, WA 98901

Phone: (509) 453-4837

Fax: (509) 453-4880

MEMBERS TERM ENDS ALTERNATES TERM ENDS

Grower Representatives 

District 1 

Dennis L. Berdan 2023 Edwin D. Clark 2023

Wenatchee, WA E. Wenatchee, WA

Andy Gale 2023 Vacancy

E. Wenatchee, WA

Dave Eichelberger 2024 Vacancy

Wenatchee, WA

Kevin Files 2024 Norm Gutzwiler 2024

Wenatchee, WA Malaga, WA

Joe Wiggs 2024 Kevin Stennes 2024

Wenatchee, WA Pateros, WA

District 2 

Donald Olmstead 2023 Bob Harris 2023

Grandview, WA Moxee, WA

Edward N. Skelton 2023 Gary Ormiston 2023

Pasco, WA Prosser, WA

Allan Schmidt 2023 Camille A. Smith 2023

Zillah, WA Wapato, WA
Julie Bosma 2024 Shane Stonemetz 2024

Outlook, WA Zillah, WA

Greg Knight 2024 Steve Knight 2024

Naches, WA Naches, WA

Handler Representatives 

District 1 

Ron Gonsalves 2023 Brett Reasor 2023

Peshastin, WA Wenatchee, WA

Javier Sanchez 2024 Jorge Sanchez 2024

E. Wenatchee, WA E. Wenatchee, WA

Tate K. Mathison 2023 Michael S. Taylor 2023

Wenatchee, WA Wenatchee, WA

District 2 

Steve Smith 2024 Doug Gibson 2024

Yakima, WA Yakima, WA

Jeff Baldwin 2024 John Harris 2024

Yakima, WA Yakima, WA

Denny Jones 2023 Cindy Alarcon 2023

Naches, WA Yakima, WA
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAmes True Temper, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) onForm 10-Q for the period ending December  30,  2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the ‘‘Report’’), I, David M.Nuti,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                     |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

|                                                     |  |  |        |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--|--|--------|
| /s/David M.  Nuti                                   |  |  |   |
| David M.Nuti                                        |  |  |   |
| Chief  FinancialOfficer(Principal FinancialOfficer) |  |  |   |
| February  13,2007                                   |  |  |   |
|                                                     |

----
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-2508

___________________________

Bank of America, N.A.

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Gary R. Peterson; Sally L. Peterson

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellants

JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., and its successors and assigns; 

Horizon Bank, National Association; Clear & Close Title Agency, Ltd., 

also all heirs and devisees of any of the above-named persons who 

are deceased; and all other persons or entities claiming any right, 

title, estate, lien or interest in real estate described in the Summons 

and Complaint herein

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: March 4, 2015

 Filed: April 15, 2015

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. In

Peterson v. Bank of America, N.A., 135 S. Ct. 1153 (2015), the Court granted a writ

of certiorari, vacated this court’s judgment in Bank of America, N.A. v. Peterson, 746

F.3d 357 (8th Cir. 2014), and remanded the case to us for reconsidering in light of its

decision in Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 790 (2015).

In Peterson, we relied upon our court’s decision in Keiran v. Home Capital,

Inc., 720 F.3d 721 (8th Cir. 2013), in holding that the Petersons’ claim for rescission

under the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., was time-barred by 15

U.S.C. § 1635(f) because of their failure to file a lawsuit within three years of their

transaction with Bank of America. 746 F.3d at 360. The Supreme Court held in

Jesinoski that the Keiran court had erred in holding that a borrower’s failure to file

a suitfor rescission within three years ofthe transaction’s consummation extinguishes

the right to rescind and bars relief. 135 S. Ct. at 792.

In light of the Court’s holding in Jesinoski, we vacate that portion of our

judgment in Bank of America N.A. v. Peterson that granted Bank of America

summary judgment on the Petersons’ claimfor rescission, reinstate that portion of our

judgment that vacated the grant of summary judgment to Bank of America on the

Petersons’ counterclaim for statutory damages, and remand the case to the district

court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

______________________________

-2-
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 97-31346

____________

CONTINENTAL INSURANCE CO.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FERRELLGAS INC, ET AL,

Defendant-Appellee,

FERRELLGAS INC; FERRELLGAS L P; EMPIREGAS INC

OF EUNICE; EMPIREGAS INC LAKE CHARLES;

EMPIREGAS INC OF LOUISIANA; T I G INSURANCE

COMPANY, A Reliance Group Holding Co; EMPIRE

GAS CORP; AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(96-CV-1860)

December 9, 1998

Before JOLLY, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 25, 2020

a1118

Order 

Clerk

November 25, 2020

161569

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161569

COA: 353093

Ottawa CC: 19-042918-FH

GARY AUSTIN EPPLETT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 29, 2020 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered. Because defendant met the requirements in MCR 

7.204(A)(2)(e), the trial court erred when it denied defendant’s motion to enter claim of 

appeal. MCR 6.425(G)(1)(e). Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to 

appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave 

granted of defendant’s resentencing argument.
# C_2004106EN.01005803.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/58

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 March 2004

in Case T-177/02: Malagutti-Vezinhet SA v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(General safety of products - Community rapid-alert system for foodstuffs - Action for compensation)

(2004/C 106/114)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-177/02: Malagutti-Vezinhet SA, a company in the process of being wound up by court order, having its registered office in Cavaillon (France), represented by B. Favarel Veidig and N. Boron, avocats, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M.-J. Jonczy and M. França) - application for compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following the release by the Commission of a rapid alert message informing consumers of the presence of pesticide residues in apples originating in France and naming the applicant as exporter of the goods in question – the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: N.J. Forwood, President, J. Pirrung and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; B. Pastor, Deputy Registrar, delivered a judgment on 10 March 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| (1) | The application is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The application is dismissed.

| (2) | The applicant is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 233 of 28.09.02.

1

---
In the event, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, does not submit a plan. My question, who would be chosen to test our plant thc level?

Also, a major concern is interstate shipment of raw hemp material to processing facility? Would we be able to set up a processing and production facility on tribal, or allotted land?  If on allotted land, what role would the Bureau of Indian Affairs, have in the process to grow hemp and processing the raw hemp material into finished hemp product? Our Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Constitution prohibits the tribe from regulating allotted land.

Taxation issue, would growing hemp, or manufacturing hemp based products, be considered income derived from the land?

Also, the issue of producing CBD oil on tribal land, or allotted land. Can a tribally chartered organization sell CBD oil within the exterior boundaries of the reservation?

Thank you!

Warm regards, 

Ray Brown
J. 

J. 

assessment" in evaluating risk of reoffending for certain offenses). 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

cc: Hon. Jim C Shirley, District Judge 

John Douglas Sims 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Pershing County Clerk 

SUPREME CmFrr 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 4(j)

                             AMENDATORY ENDORSEMENT
                           INITIAL PAYMENT GUARANTEE
<PAGE>

                     Peoples Benefit Life Insurance Company
     A Stock Company
     Home Office located at: 4333 Edgewood Road NE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52499
     (Hereafter called the Company, we, our or us)  (800)-525-6205


                             AMENDATORY ENDORSEMENT


This endorsement is made part of the annuity contract to which it is attached,
understood and agreed that Section 10 - Annuity Payments, subsection C. Variable
Account Payment Options is amended by adding the following provision:


Optional Initial Payment Guarantee
Upon annuitization, You may elect an option that guarantees Your variable
annuity payments will never be less than a percentage of the initial variable
annuity payment. You cannot terminate the payment guarantee after You have
selected the option. The percentage applicable to the initial payment and the
fee for the option will be those currently applicable at the time of
annuitization.



Further, the existing subsection within the Contract is amended by adding the
following provision:

Determination of Subsequent Variable Payments
The amount of each variable annuity payment after the first will increase or
decrease according to the value of the variable annuity units which reflect the
investment experience of the selected Subaccounts. Each variable annuity payment
after the first will be equal to the number of variable annuity units in the
selected Subaccounts multiplied by the variable annuity unit value on the date
the payment is made. The number of variable annuity units in each selected
Subaccount is determined by dividing the first variable annuity payment
allocated to the Subaccount by the variable annuity unit value of that
Subaccount on the Annuity Commencement Date. If the Optional Initial Payment
Guarantee is chosen, payments would be "stabilized" (would change only once per
year) but "value adjustments" would be made to ensure full value would be
received.



                   Signed for the Company at the Home Office.

/s/ Craig D. Vermie                   /s/ Bart Herbert, Jr.

Craig D. Vermie                       Bart Herbert, Jr.
Secretary                             President


Form No. AE IP 0302