alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Protected

by law

Traced

from farm to store

Inspected

by experts

Shaped

by public input

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

Final.pdf 1 2/23/2024 9:32:35 AM
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, David D’Addario, certify that: 

1. Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Wise Metals Group LLC; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter covered by this report (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 21, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Francisco Peguero-Santana, Appellant.

—Case held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings, in accordance with same Memorandum as in *People v Peguero-Castillo*(174 AD2d 1026 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 1st Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5

<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE  COMPANY'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED     IN    ITS     ENTIRETY    BY    REFERENCE    TO    SUCH    REPORT.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                          5,886,134
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       6,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                6,000,459
<PP&E>                                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  6,178,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             104,507
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                          554,991
<OTHER-SE>                                                      2,656,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    6,178,559
<SALES>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        0
<CGS>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    21,227
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                21,227
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  (626,654)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (605,423)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (0.19)


</TABLE>
JIMMIE GOODINE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 3563

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed October 14, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo B ondi, Attorney General, and Charles R. McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing and

Certification. We gran t the motion to the extent that it requested the inclusion of a

citation to controlling authority. However, we deny Appellant’s request to certifyquestions of great public importance. Accordingly, we withdraw our former

opinion filed on August 22, 2014, and substitute this opinion in its place.

AFFIRMED. See Williams v. State , 143 So. 3d 423 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

WOLF

, ROWE

, and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.

2
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART THREE

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

UNION POLICIES AND INTERNAL ACTIONS

TITLE IV

FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL

FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, SERVICES AND CAPITAL

CHAPTER 1

WORKERS

Article 48

(ex Article 42 TEC)

(ex Article 42 TEC)

The European Parliament and the Council shall, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, adopt such measures in the field of social security as are necessary to provide freedom of movement for workers; to this end, they shall make arrangements to secure for employed and self-employed migrant workers and their dependants:

| (a) | aggregation, for the purpose of acquiring and retaining the right to benefit and of calculating the amount of benefit, of all periods taken into account under the laws of the several countries; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

aggregation, for the purpose of acquiring and retaining the right to benefit and of calculating the amount of benefit, of all periods taken into account under the laws of the several countries;

| (b) | payment of benefits to persons resident in the territories of Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

payment of benefits to persons resident in the territories of Member States.

Where a member of the Council declares that a draft legislative act referred to in the first subparagraph would affect important aspects of its social security system, including its scope, cost or financial structure, or would affect the financial balance of that system, it may request that the matter be referred to the European Council. In that case, the ordinary legislative procedure shall be suspended. After discussion, the European Council shall, within four months of this suspension, either:

| (a) | refer the draft back to the Council, which shall terminate the suspension of the ordinary legislative procedure; or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

refer the draft back to the Council, which shall terminate the suspension of the ordinary legislative procedure; or

| (b) | take no action or request the Commission to submit a new proposal; in that case, the act originally proposed shall be deemed not to have been adopted. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

take no action or request the Commission to submit a new proposal; in that case, the act originally proposed shall be deemed not to have been adopted.

---
Subsidiary
    
    Registered in
    
    AcquiredA. M. Castle & Co. (Canada) Inc.
    
    Ontario
    
    July 31, 1990Advanced Fabricating Technology LLC.
    
    Delaware
    
    May 1, 2000Castle Metals de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    February 27, 2004A. M. Castle & Co. (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
    
    Singapore
    
    October 13, 2006Keystone Tube Company
    
    Delaware
    
    June 2, 1997Oliver Steel Company
    
    Delaware
    
    July 15, 1998Paramont Machine Company, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    April 1, 1999Total Plastics, Inc.
    
    Michigan
    
    January 2, 1996Transtar Intermediate Holdings #2, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    September 5, 2006Transtar Metals Holdings
    
    Delaware
    
    September 5, 2006Transtar Inventory Corp.
    
    Delaware
    
    September 5, 2006Transtar Metals Corp.
    
    Delaware
    
    September 5, 2006Transtar Marine Corp.
    
    Delaware
    
    September 5, 2006A.M. Castle Metal Materials (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    Pu Dong Province, Peoples Republic of China
    
    November 22, 2007Metals U.K. Group
    
    United Kingdom
    
    January 3, 2008
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING 

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND 

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE.

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT 

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S 

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT 

USDA, AMS, FVP, SCI

831 MITTEN ROAD, ROOM 200

BURLINGAME, CA 94010

PHONE: 650-552-9073

FAX: 650-552-9147

EQUIPMENT CATALOG
BRAZILNUTSFORAFLATOXINANALYSIS

Mold,discoloration,orotherdefectswhichdonotaffectthekerneltoagreaterextentthanshown

abovewillbeclassedaswholesomeandincludedinchemicalanalysis.

USDAOfficialVisualAid BRZ-CP-1(Previouslyslides1-18,1969)August2015
BRAZILNUTSFORAFLATOXINANALYSIS

Mold,discoloration,orotherdefectswhichaffecttheappearancetotheextentshownaboveormore

willbeclassedasobviouslyobjectionableandwillnotbeincludedinchemicalanalysis.

USDAOfficialVisualAid BRZ-CP-2(Previouslyslides19-32,1969)August2015
# C_2012326EN.01004701.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/1

---

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PART SIX

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 2

LEGAL ACTS OF THE UNION, ADOPTION PROCEDURES AND OTHER PROVISIONS

SECTION 2

SECTION 2

PROCEDURES FOR THE ADOPTION OF ACTS AND OTHER PROVISIONS

Article 297

(ex Article 254 TEC)

(ex Article 254 TEC)

1.   Legislative acts adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure shall be signed by the President of the European Parliament and by the President of the Council.

Legislative acts adopted under a special legislative procedure shall be signed by the President of the institution which adopted them.

Legislative acts shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. They shall enter into force on the date specified in them or, in the absence thereof, on the twentieth day following that of their publication.

Official Journal of the European Union

2.   Non-legislative acts adopted in the form of regulations, directives or decisions, when the latter do not specify to whom they are addressed, shall be signed by the President of the institution which adopted them.

Regulations and directives which are addressed to all Member States, as well as decisions which do not specify to whom they are addressed, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. They shall enter into force on the date specified in them or, in the absence thereof, on the twentieth day following that of their publication.

Official Journal of the European Union

Other directives, and decisions which specify to whom they are addressed, shall be notified to those to whom they are addressed and shall take effect upon such notification.

---
<PAGE>


                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
                         AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS OF
                            FINLAY ENTERPRISES, INC.
                            ------------------------

       Effective on and after September 10, 2003, the Amended and Restated
By-Laws (the "By Laws"), of Finlay Enterprises, Inc. is amended pursuant to
Article X thereof in the following respect:


      1.   Section 2 of Article III of the By-Laws shall be amended to read in
its entirety as follows:

           Section 2. Number, Qualification and Election. Except as otherwise
      fixed by or pursuant to the provisions of the Certificate and subject to
      the rights of the holders of any class or series of stock having
      preference over the Common Stock as to dividends or upon liquidation to
      elect additional directors in certain circumstances as provided in the
      Certificate, the number of directors of the Corporation that shall
      constitute the Whole Board shall be no less than eight and no more than
      eleven, as such number shall be increased or decreased as determined by
      the Board of Directors. Each director shall be at least 21 years of age.
      Directors need not be stockholders of the Corporation.

      2.   Except as amended hereby, the By-Laws shall remain in full force and
effect, without change or modification.



                                                        BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF
                                                        DIRECTORS OF FINLAY
                                                        ENTERPRISES, INC.
Order entered May 17, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-11-00279-CV

YVONNE BROWN, Appellant

V.

FALLS ON CLEARWOOD, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-10-07137-A

ORDER

The supplemental clerk’s record, if any, in this case is overdue. By order dated January 

10, 2103, we ordered the Dallas County Clerk to file, within ten days, a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing all papers from the Justice Court filed with the County Court in this case. To 

date, the supplemental clerk’s record has not been filed. Nor have we received any 

correspondence from the County Clerk regarding the status of the supplemental clerk’s record. 

This appeal cannot proceed until the issue of the supplemental clerk’s record is resolved. 

Therefore, the Dallas County Clerk is ORDERED to file, within FIVE DAYS, either (1) 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing all papers from the Justice Court filed with the County 

Court in this case; or (2) written verification that no such papers were filed in this case.
Appellant’s brief in this case is due within THIRTY DAYS of the filing of the 

supplemental clerk’s record or written verification that the requested records have not been filed 

in this case. We CAUTION appellant that no extensions will be granted and that failure to 

timely file a brief in this case will result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8; 42.3.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order, by electronic 

transmission, to all parties and to:

John F. Warren

Dallas County Clerk

Records Building, 2nd Floor

509 Main St., Suite 200

Dallas, TX 75202

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Order filed April 7, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00205-CV

____________

In the Interest of L.E.R., a Child

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-00691J

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the 

termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue. Both parents have appealed. 

Appellant’s brief was due April 2, 2015. Counsel for the father requested and was 

granted an extension of time to file his brief until April 22, 2015. Counsel for the 

mother has not filed a brief or a request for an extension of time

Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be 

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (effective May 1, 2012). The accelerated schedule 

requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines. Therefore we ORDER 
appointed counsel, William M. Thursland, to file appellant’s brief on behalf of 

the mother no later than April 22, 2015. If the brief is not filed by that date, 

counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of 

court.

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**


**OF
      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Sundaresan Raja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      Sundaresan Raja


Sundaresan
      Raja


Principal
      Executive Officer





September
      18, 2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1666

ROSALIE T. JOHNSON, Evangelist,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OLSTEN KIMBERLY QUALITYCARE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-96-3250-2-18AJ)

Submitted: November 12, 1997 Decided: January 9, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rosalie T. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Thomas, GIGNILLIAT,

SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina; Gregory Scott Richters,

IRVIN, STANFORD & KESSLER, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary

judgment in favor of Appellee. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Olsten Kimberly

Qualitycare, No. CA-96-3250-2-18AJ (D.S.C. May 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SCWC-11-0000892

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

HERMAN ALAN SANTIAGO, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-11-0000892; CASE NO. 3DTA-11-00772)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ

of Certiorari, filed on March 10, 2015, is hereby accepted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 14, 2015.

Alen M. Kaneshiro 

for petitioner

Jason R. Kwiat

for respondent

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000892

14-APR-2015

10:12 AM