alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1097 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent unjust and irrational 

criminal punishments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia (for himself and Mr. MASSIE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent unjust 

and irrational criminal punishments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice Safety Valve 

5 Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE A SENTENCE BELOW A 

7 STATUTORY MINIMUM. 

8 Section 3553 of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1097 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub2 section (h); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(g) AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE A SENTENCE BELOW A

6 STATUTORY MINIMUM TO PREVENT AN UNJUST SEN7 TENCE.— 

8 ‘‘(1) GENERAL RULE.—Notwithstanding any 

9 provision of law other than this subsection, the court 

10 may impose a sentence below a statutory minimum 

11 if the court finds that it is necessary to do so in 

12 order to avoid violating the requirements of sub13 section (a). 

14 ‘‘(2) COURT TO GIVE PARTIES NOTICE.—Before 

15 imposing a sentence under paragraph (1), the court 

16 shall give the parties reasonable notice of the court’s 

17 intent to do so and an opportunity to respond. 

18 ‘‘(3) STATEMENT IN WRITING OF FACTORS.— 

19 The court shall state, in the written statement of 

20 reasons, the factors under subsection (a) that re21 quire imposition of a sentence below the statutory 

22 minimum. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1097 IH

1 ‘‘(4) APPEAL RIGHTS NOT LIMITED.—This sub2 section does not limit any right to appeal that would 

3 otherwise exist in its absence.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- Amendment to Employment Agreement



  
  
 EXHIBIT 10.2 
  
 March 25, 2002 
  
 Mr. Christopher J. McGurk 
 c/o Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. 
 2500 Broadway Street 
 Santa Monica, CA 90404 
  
 Dear Mr. McGurk: 
  
 Kindly refer to the
Employment Agreement dated as of April 28, 1999 (the “Employment Agreement”) between you (“Executive”) and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. (the “Company”). 
  
 Effective as of the date hereof, the Company and Executive mutually agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 
  
 1. The term of the Employment Agreement is hereby extended so that it will now expire April 30, 2007. 
  
 The word “Term” as used in the Employment Agreement shall be deemed to include the term as hereby extended. 
  
 2. The base salary set forth in Paragraph 7(a)(i) of the Employment Agreement shall continue in effect through April 30, 2004.
Thereafter through the end of the Term, in consideration for the services to be rendered by Executive and in full discharge of the Company’s salary obligations for such period, the Company shall pay Executive an annualized base salary of
$2,300,000. 
  
 3. Except as herein specifically provided, the Employment Agreement shall not be amended in any
respect whatsoever and shall continue in full force and effect. 
  
 If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding and
agreement, please so indicate by signing in the place for your signature below. 
  

	 	Ve
	ry truly yours, 
 

  
 
	 METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER INC
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/    WILLIAM A. JONES        
 

	  	 	 William A. Jones
 Senior Executive Vice President
 

 
  
 AGREED: 
  


	 
	 /s/    CHRISTOPHER J.
MCGURK        
 

	 Christopher J. McGurk
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Forms S-3 (No. 333-127095, No. 333-125602, No. 333-122752, No. 333-33174, No.
      333-34822 and No. 333-89973) and Forms S-8 (No. 333-121041, No. 333-94603 and
      No. 333-82541) of
      MSGI
      Security Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries, of our report dated November 13,
      2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008
      and
      2007 and for the fiscal years then ended, which is included in this Form 10-KSB
      filing, which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
      explanatory paragraph relating to the ability of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc.
      to continue as a going concern.





/s/
      Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP





November
      13, 2008


Edison,
      New Jersey
OMB No. 0581-0093

LP-14 (Expiration Date 11/30/2024)

NOMINEE’S AGREEMENT TO SERVE

If appointed, I agree to serve on the National Pork Board (Board), and to disclose

to the Secretary of Agriculture any relationship with any pork promotion entity or 

any organization that has a contractual relationship with the Board.

_____________________________ _______________________

Signature Date

Note: According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to 

a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 

0581-0093. There is no time estimated to complete this information collection because it requires only a signature.

In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its 

Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based 

on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, 

family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights 

activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing 

deadlines vary by program or incident. 

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, 

American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or 

contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages 

other than English. 

To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at 

http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all 

of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter 

to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights; 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.;

Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, 

employer, and lender.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code





In connection with the Quarterly Report of OHA Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cory E. Gilbert, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:August 14, 2018/s/ Cory E. GilbertCory E. GilbertChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Sent: Sunday, February 28,201011 :35 AM 

To: Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Subject: FW: Plattsburgh EAS 

From: John [mailto:johnff@charter.net] 


Sent: Sun 2/28/2010 10:18 AM 


To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 


Subject: Plattsburgh EAS 


Sir: 

I urge you to not accept the recommendation of the local legislature to change carriers from 

Cape Air to Colgan. Cape Air has reliably and economically offered frequent service. This is 

contrary to what Colgan has even stated it will offer. . 

There is little to any redeemable value to this recommended change and it world neither meet 

local market needs. 

·Thank you. 

John F. Falcetta . 

Morrisonville, NY 

1
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
      Clay
      Hulette, the Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/
                R. Clay HuletteR.
                Clay HuletteVice
                President and Chief Financial OfficerMay
                14, 2008
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-15-00102-CV 

Andrew H. Jackson 

v. 

John W. Jackson, Victoria Jackson 

Bannister, and Melinda L. Jackson 

as Executrix of the Estate of Monroe 

Scott Jackson, II, Linda M. Welty, 

O.B. Jackson Jr., Gaines Bradford 

Jackson, Susan D. Hensley, and 

Marjorye M. Heldt 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From the 96th District Court 

of Tarrant County (096-271894-14) 

September 22, 2016 

Opinion by Justice Gardner 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

 It is further ordered that Appellant Andrew H. Jackson shall pay all of the 

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Anne Gardner_________________ 

 Justice Anne Gardner
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0385 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2010-NM-256-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of
Bowne & Co., Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Johnson,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | 2. The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                                 
| | --------------------------------
| | /s/ ROBERT M. JOHNSON           
| |                                 
| | Robert M. Johnson               
| | Chairman of the Board, President
| | and Chief Executive Officer     

March 15, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Jenkins, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), rendered May 22, 1989, convicting defendant after a jury trial of sexual abuse in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of *l-Vi*to *A.-V2*years, and a concurrent term of one year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

On appeal, defendant argues that the disparity between his actual appearance and the victim’s description of her attacker, together with the victim’s testimony that she saw defendant several times after the incident but did not call the police, establishes that his conviction is against the weight of the evidence.

The forty-one-year old victim testified that she was attacked inside the elevator of her building while she was on her way *380to work. When defendant approached her with a drawn knife, she offered her valuables, but defendant replied, "I just want you.” The victim was then taken by the arm through a hallway to a stairwell, where defendant ripped open her blouse and began kissing and fondling her neck and breasts. The victim fought back by grabbing the attacker’s hair and ear and knocking his head against the wall, after which she fled to the safety of her apartment.

Police were telephoned immediately and the next morning, the victim reported the crime at the precinct, describing the perpetrator as a five foot, seven inch black man, weighing one hundred seventy pounds. Twice, while the victim was on her way to work, she saw defendant, but said nothing because she did not want "to make trouble” for her son, who was accompanying her. Three months after the attack, while paying her rent, she again observed defendant and identified him to a police officer.

Defendant testified at trial, denying any involvement with the victim. Testimony was adduced that at the time of the incident, defendant had "virginal” facial hair, and stood 6 feet tall, and weighted about 200 pounds.

Defendant’s conviction is not against the weight of the evidence. The relative probative force of the testimony supports the jury’s determination to credit the victim’s identification testimony *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490). The evidence shows that the victim, who reacted calmly to the circumstances, had ample opportunity to observe her attacker at close range under good lighting conditions. The differences in the victim’s description of her attacker and defendant presented a question of fact for the jury to determine *(People v Caban,*120 AD2d 603, *lv denied*68 NY2d 768). So too did the victim’s explanation, which we find reasonable, of her decision not to summon the police on the two occasions, when she had seen the defendant, between the attack and day of defendant’s arrest. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
1

Certified Lamb Nominating Organizations

FEEDERS

West, CO-01-F-02

Colorado Sheep and Wool Authority

Ms. Bonnie Brown

P.O. Box 292 

Delta, CO 81416-0292

(970) 874-1433 

cwgawool@aol.com

West, CO-02-F-02

Colorado Wool Growers Association

Ms. Bonnie Brown

P.O. Box 292

Delta, CO 81416-0292

(970) 874-1433 

cwgawool@aol.com

West, NA-03-F-02

National Lamb Feeders Association

Karen Maneotis

Executive Director

P.O. Box 1698

Craig, CO 81626

(970) 629-5067

Lambfeeders1@outlook.com

karenknez@hotmail.com

East, NY-04-F-02

Empire Sheep Producer Association, Inc.

Mr. W. Keith Stumbo

P.O. Box 121, Ashley Road

Honeoye, NY 14471

(585) 367-2775

sheepkath@aol.com

West, TX-06-F-02

Texas Farm Bureau

Mr. Russell W. Boening

P.O. Box 2689

Waco, TX 76702-2689

(254) 772-3030

rboening@txfb.org
2

West, NA-05-F-21

American Sheep Industry Association

Mr. Peter Orwick

9785 S. Maroon Circle, Suite 360

Englewood, Colorado 80112

(303) 771-3500, ext. 103

porwick@sheepusa.org

East, PA-07-F-02

Pennsylvania Sheep and Wool Growers Association

Mr. Dan Turner, President

(717) 532-2435

danlturner44@gmail.com

psushephard@yahoo.com

East, MI-08-F-04

Michigan Sheep Breeders Association

Mr. Maury Kaercher

5859 East E Avenue

Kalamazoo, MI 49004

(269) 569-9592

kaercher@msu.edu

East, RA-09-F-05

Highland Sheep and Wool Producers'

Mr. Matthew Blagg, President

531 Little Mountain Trail

Doe Hill, VA 24433

(540) 396-3444

midblagst@hotmail.com

As of March 5, 2024
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

** To the extent that Derryberry raises other issues on appeal, the district court granted the certificate of appealability only on the issue concerning the applicability of § 2244(d)’s one-year limitation period. Thus, any other issue

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31211 Conference Calendar

ERNEST D. DERRYBERRY, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-1239

- - - - - - - - - - August 19, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ernest D. Derryberry, Louisiana inmate #117394, appeals the dismissal of his habeas application which challenged his 42-year sentence for manslaughter. He argues that the district court erred in basing the dismissal on the one-year limitation period from 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). ** Because Derryberry delivered hisNo. 97-31211 -2-

raised is not properly before this court. See Lackey v. Johnson , 116 F.3d 149, 151-52 (5th Cir. 1997).

*** Our review of Derryberry’s habeas grounds indicates that Derryberry cannot meet the standard warranting our authorization for filing a second or successive habeas application in the district court. § 2244(b)(1), (2). Those grounds are the following: invalid prior convictions upon which the present sentence was enhanced; violation of due process by the sentencing court’s failure to afford counsel adequate time to review the presentence report; and ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to object to the lack of adequate time for review and for failing to investigate the prior convictions. habeas application to prison officials for mailing before April 24, 1997, the application was timely filed, and the district court’s rationale for dismissal appears to be in error. See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988); United States v. Flores , 135 F.3d 1000, 1004-06 (5th Cir. 1998). We affirm the district court’s dismissal on an alternate basis. Derryberry had filed a prior habeas petition in federal court challenging his continued confinement on his 42-year sentence. That habeas petition was denied, and this court denied Derryberry’s request for a certificate of probable cause. See Derryberry v. Cain , No. 95-30752 (5th Cir. Dec. 13, 1995) (single-judge order). Derryberry’s 1997 federal habeas application was his second challenge, which required this court’s authorization to proceed in the district court. *** § 2244(b). Derryberry failed to obtain our authorization, and thus, the district court was without jurisdiction to entertain the habeas application. § 2244(a).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Nicholas Smith, Chief Financial Officer of Alto Neuroscience, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge,


1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and


2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:March 21, 2024By:/s/ Nicholas SmithNicholas SmithChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)