alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7010
STEVEN FITZGERALD SAUNDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANDREA E. KIRKLAND; STEPHEN W. WARD; EARLE D. ROBERTS, JR., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-96-186-3-MU) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Fitzgerald Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Saunders v. Kirkland , No. CA-96-186-3-MU (W.D.N.C. June 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ZAGG Incorporated (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Pedersen
II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/
      ROBERT G. PEDERSEN IIRobert
      G. Pedersen IIChief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      12, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young.                    

*Date:*                         May 16, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Susan Wohler Sunnarborg, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National, Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7185, Bethesda, MD 20892,                         *sunnarborgsw@nhlbi.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 17, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-9875 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Re: Farm Bill Implementation Listening Session on HempSince the Agricultural Act of 2014 authorized farming industrial hemp, production across the nation has exploded. In Oregon alone, production in 2018 exceeded 11,000 acres and is expected to reach at least 40,000 acres in 2019, making it the state’s number one commodity. I applaud the 2018 Farm Bill’s further legalization of Industrial Hemp.However, the testing standards need to be addressed to clarify that testing labs should not be changing the molecular make-up of the plant prior to testing, by heating it, and thus changing the results that would otherwise be obtained. The 2018 definition calls for a “delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis”, which is consistent with the 2014 definition and is what the industry has become accustomed to.The potential problem arises under the new testing procedure which calls for “using postdecarboxylation or other similarly reliable methods, ...” I would ask that the USDA allow the “similarly reliable method” to be the preferred method and adopt the current standard of a non-decarboxylation test for delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration. A change from the current standard would render many of the strains, currently in production, illegal and would result in an immediate disruption in this rapidly growing industry.The current non-decarboxylation method has been the industry standard since 2014 and has been proven to be an effective and reliable testing method for the industry. I would ask that this testing method be adopted under the new rules and continue to be the standard that the industry has come to rely on.Thank you for your consideration,Matt Cyrus
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Slade, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.) rendered May 11, 1988, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the hearing court should have suppressed testimony by the victim and the eyewitness as to showup identifications in which they participated on the grounds that those procedures were unduly suggestive and not required by any exigent circumstances. We disagree.

Procedures that are less than ideal may be acceptable in the interest of a prompt identification. This is particularly true in a case such as the present in view of the proximity of the apprehension of the defendant in time and place to the scene of the crime *(see, People v Love,*57 NY2d 1023). Furthermore, consecutive identifications of a showup nature are not presumptively forbidden on the ground that the initial identification automatically negates the at-the-scene existence of exigent circumstances *(see, People v Duuvon,*77 NY2d 541). In *640this regard, the defendant offered no proof at the pretrial hearing that the conduct of the police was unduly suggestive.

The defendant further contends that a statement he made to the police revealing the whereabouts of the complainant’s stolen pocketbook should have been suppressed because it was made in the absence of *Miranda*warnings. The hearing court found this statement—which was made in response to an inquiry as to the defendant’s name and address only—to have been spontaneous and this court finds no basis to disturb that finding as a matter of law *(see, People v Ellis,*58 NY2d *748; cf., People v Lanahan,*55 NY2d 711).

Finally, the court properly exercised its discretion in ruling that the People could inquire into two of the defendant’s prior convictions *(see, People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371). Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 71611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28713]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS13-25]

Appraisal Subcommittee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: Federal Reserve Board--International Square location, 
1850 K Street NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20006.
    Date: December 11, 2013.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

Summary Agenda

October 9, 2013 minutes--Open Session

    (No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)

Discussion Agenda

Delegation of Authority Recommendation
    [cir] 2014 Meeting Schedule
Federal Advisory Committee Charter
Appraisal Foundation August 2013 Grant Reimbursement Request
Compliance Review(s)
Staff Service Recognition

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    If you plan to attend the meeting in person, we ask that you notify 
the Federal Reserve Board via email at appraisal-questions@frb.gov, 
requesting a return meeting registration email. The Federal Reserve Law 
Enforcement Unit will then send an email message with a Web link where 
you may provide your date of birth and social security number through 
their encrypted system. You may register until close of business 
December 4, 2013. You will also be asked to provide identifying 
information, including a valid government-issued photo ID, before being 
admitted to the meeting. Alternatively, you can contact Kevin Wilson at 
202-452-2362 for other registration options. The meeting space is 
intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will 
not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that 
reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, 
photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device 
designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: November 25, 2013.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-28713 Filed 11-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDEDNT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Bradley Real Estate, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-87084 and 33-62200) on Form S-3 and the registration statements (Nos.
33-34884 and 33-65180) on Form S-8 of Bradley Real Estate, Inc. of our report
dated February 19, 1996, except for note 10, which is as of March 15, 1996,
relating to the balance sheets and related schedule of Bradley Real Estate,
Inc. as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related statements of income,
changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1995, which report appears in the December
31, 1995 annual report on Form 10-K of Bradley Real Estate, Inc.



                                                           KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 1996


                                      31
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

VOLTSTAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., FKA HORIZON

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC., A DELAWARE 

CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2014-1772

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:13-cv-05570, Judge 

John Z. Lee.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JOEL B. ROTHMAN, Schneider Rothman IP Law Group, 

Boca Raton, FL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also 

represented by JEROLD I. SCHNEIDER. 

BRADFORD PETER LYERLA, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented 

by JOSHUA SEGAL, Washington, DC.

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (Before PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE,

Circuit Judge, and GILSTRAP, District Judge.

∗

).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 14, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court

∗ Honorable Rodney Gilstrap, District Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, 

sitting by designation.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

January 15, 2015

The Honorable Dana Aunkst

Acting Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Rachel Carson State Office Building

P.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063

Dear Acting Secretary Aunkst:

On September 5, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a 

revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department 

of Environmental Protection. The SIP revision requests redesignation from nonattainment to 

attainment, and approval of the maintenance plan of the Philadelphia-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE 

1997 annual and the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 area. EPA has determined that the submittal is

administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Rose Quinto, Office 

of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2182. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

 Sincerely, 

/s/

David L. Arnold, Acting Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Joyce E. Epps, Director, PADEP Bureau of Air Quality
1517 WEST FRONT STREET SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702 TEL: 903-593-8471 FAX: 903-593-2193

Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van 

Zandt and Wood Counties

www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us

CHIEF JUSTICE

JAMES T. WORTHEN

JUSTICES

BRIAN HOYLE

GREG NEELEY

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

CLERK

CATHY S. LUSK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

MARGARET HUSSEY

April 7, 2015

Ms. Lois Rogers

District Clerk, Smith County

Courthouse, Suite 204

100 North Broadway Avenue

Tyler, TX 75702-7201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 12-14-00096-CR, 12-14-00097-CR, 

12-14-00098-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 114-0549-09, 114-0550-09, 114-0551-09

Style: Demaria Travar Woods

v.

The State of Texas

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the 

Mandate issued in the above causes. When the District or County Clerk has executed the 

Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the 

information below and to return the attached copy to this office.

Very truly yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

CC: Mr. Austin R. Jackson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Michael J. West (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mandate executed on __8TH__ day of __APRIL_______________, 2015.

Brief explanation of action taken: ___SCANNED_______________________________________

____________LINDA RHYMES________________________________District/County Clerk

FILE COPY

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/8/2015 2:10:43 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Perkins, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Levittan, J.), rendered January 11, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him as a violent predicate felon to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

The citizen informant, in the early morning hours, was awakened by the sound of breaking wood. Looking out of her window, she observed defendant, a black male wearing a red sweatshirt, breaking the screen to a basement window and climbing inside. She immediately called the police. When the officers arrived at the scene moments later, a black male wearing a red sweatshirt and the only person in sight, was standing on the corner outside of the building. Defendant was momentarily detained, and escorted into an interior courtyard of the building where he was positively identified.

The information possessed by responding police and the circumstances presented at the crime scene provided a legal predicate for the temporary stop of defendant *(People v Beltraz,*165 AD2d 745). Nor did transporting defendant a very short distance, under minimal restraint, for purposes of conducting a showup identification, convert this into a full-blown arrest *(see, People v Hicks,*68 NY2d 234, 240).

We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Asch and Kassal, JJ.
FORMAL RECOMMENDATION BY THE

NATIONAL ORGANIC STANDARDS BOARD (NOSB) 

TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIC PROGRAM (NOP) 

Date: __May 31, 2006______________________

Subject: Sunset Review - 205.603; Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic livestock 

production 

Chair: Kevin R. O’Rell_________________________________ 

Recommendation

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action: _XXXX_______ 

Guidance Statement: _

Other: ________ 

Statement of the Recommendation:

See attached Recommendation for Renewal of Chlorine Materials as Synthetic substances 

allowed for use in organic livestock production on 205.603, category use (a) as disinfectants, 

sanitizer, and medical treatments as applicable. 

NOSB Vote: 

Moved: Hue Karreman Second: Kevin Engelbert 

Yes – 11 

No – 1 

Abstain – 0 

Absent- 2 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation:

NOSB Sunset Material Vote 

Response by the NOP:
National Organic Standards Board 

Livestock Committee 

Final Recommendation for the Synthetic substances allowed for use in 

organic livestock production 

April 20, 2006

Category Use: 

(a) As disinfectants, sanitizer, and medical treatments as applicable

Committee Summary: 

A number of specific comments were received on chlorine. Several commentors stated 

that chlorine materials (calcium hypochlorite, chlorine dioxide and sodium hypochlorite) 

should remain on the National List. Some commentors stated that chlorine materials 

(calcium hypochlorite, chlorine dioxide, sodium hypochlorite) should be removed from 

the list. The Livestock Committee agrees with the commentors who supported the 

renewal of chlorine materials (calcium hypochlorite, chlorine dioxide and sodium 

hypochlorite) because their use is considered essential for organic livestock production 

and they can be used in a way compatible with organic production practices. 

NOSB Recommendation(s): 

Recommendation Based upon Comments Received – 205.603(a)

The NOSB recommends the renewal of the following substance(s) in this use category: 

 

(5) Chlorine materials—disinfecting and sanitizing facilities and equipment. Residual 

chlorine levels in the water shall not exceed the maximum residual disinfectant 

limit under the Safe Drinking Water Act. 

(i) Calcium hypochlorite. 

(ii) Calcium dioxide. 

(iii) Sodium hypochlorite. 

Moved: Hue Karreman Second: Kevin Engelbert 

Board vote: Yes – 11 No – 1 Abstain – 0 Absent - 2
<PAGE>   1
                           BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION

                                  EXHIBIT 22.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
   Name of Subsidiary                               State in which Incorporated
   ------------------                               ---------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>
Bridgford Distributing Company                              California
Bridgford Meat Company                                      California
Bridgford Foods of Illinois, Inc.                           California
A.S.I. Corporation                                          California
Bridgford Distributing Company of
 Delaware (inactive)                                         Delaware
American Ham Processors, Inc.*
 (inactive)                                                  Delaware
Bert Packing Company (inactive)                              Illinois
Moriarty Meat Company (inactive)                             Illinois
</TABLE>

* No shares have been issued.


                               Page 15 of 15 Pages
i'i 

SERVED NOVEMBER 2,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

•Ei^RTMENTOF 

ANSPORWION 

; € 1 OPERATIONS 

•:0V - 3 A S: 30 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0980 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009SW270126) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Rormie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrativ 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10SW0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Thomas Newton Boiling, Respondent's Counsel 

Managing Attorney, Regulatory Affairs 

Continental Airlines, Inc., Respondent 

1600 Smith Street, 15"' Floor HQSLG 

Houston, TX 77002 

TEL: 713-324-5131 

FAX: 713-324-5160 

Tim Duff, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel, ASW-7 

Southwest Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd. 

Ft. Worth, TX 76193-0007 

TEL 817-222-5099 

FAX 817- 222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202- 366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

i