40726 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

[FR Doc. 2010–17133 Filed 7–13–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0613] 

Safety Zones: Annual Events 

Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain 

of the Port Buffalo Zone 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of 

regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce 

the safety zones for annual fireworks 

displays in the Captain of the Port 

Buffalo Zone from July 2, 2010 through 

July 31, 2010. This action is necessary 

to protect the safety of life and property 

on navigable waters during these events. 

During the enforcement period, no 

person or vessel may enter the safety 

zones without the permission of the 

Captain of the Port Buffalo. 

DATES: This notice provides information 

about enforcement of safety zones in 33 

CFR Part 165.939 enforced from July 2, 

2010 at 9:30 p.m. through July 25, 2010 

at 10 p.m. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this notice, call 

or e-mail MST2 Jessica Seguin, Marine 

Events Coordinator, Coast Guard Sector 

Buffalo, 1 Fuhrmann Blvd., Buffalo, NY 

14203; Coast Guard telephone 716–843– 

9353, e-mail 

Jessica.L.Seguin@USCG.Mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Coast Guard will enforce the 

following safety zones listed in 33 CFR 

165.939: 

1. Boldt Castle 4th of July Fireworks 

on the St. Lawrence River, Heart Island, 

NY in 33 CFR 165.939(a)(1) on July 4, 

2010 from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. 

2. French Festival Fireworks on the 

St. Lawrence River, Cape Vincent, NY in 

33 CFR 165.939(a)(3) on July 10, 2010 

from 9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. 

3. Brewerton Fireworks on Oneida 

River near Lake Ontario, Brewerton, NY 

in 33 CFR 165.939(a)(4) on July 3, 2010 

from 9:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. 

4. Seneca River Days on the Seneca 

River, Baldwinsville, NY in 33 CFR 

165.939(a)(7) on July 9, 2010 from 9 

p.m. to 10 p.m. 

5. Oswego Harborfest on Lake 

Ontario, Oswego, NY in 33 CFR 

165.939(a)(8) on July 24, 2010 from 9:30 

p.m. to 10 p.m. 

6. Village Fireworks on Sodus Bay, 

Sodus Point, NY in 33 CFR 

165.939(a)(9) on July 3, 2010 from 10 

p.m. to 10:30 p.m. 

7. City of Syracuse Fireworks 

Celebration on Onondaga Lake, 

Syracuse, NY in 33 CFR 165.939(a)(10) 

on July 2, 2010 from 9:30 p.m. to 10:30 

p.m. 

8. Tom Graves Memorial on Port Bay, 

Wolcott, NY in 33 CFR 165.939(a)(11) 

on July 3, 2010 from 9:30 p.m. to 10 

p.m. 

9. North Tonawanda Fireworks 

Display on the East Niagara River, North 

Tonawanda, NY in 33 CFR 

165.939(a)(13) on July 4, 2010 from 9 

p.m. to 10 p.m. 

10. Tonawanda’s Canal Fest 

Fireworks, on the East Niagara River, 

Tonawanda, NY in 33 CFR 

165.393(a)(14) on July 25, 2010 from 

9:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. 

11. Fairport Harbor Mardi Gras 

Fireworks on Lake Erie, Fairport Harbor 

Beach, OH in 33 CFR 165.939(a)(17) on 

July 5, 2010 from 10 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. 

12. Mentor Harbor Yacht Club 

Fireworks Celebration on Lake Erie, 

Mentor Harbor, OH in 33 CFR 

165.939(a)(19) on July 3, 2010 from 10 

p.m. to 10:30 p.m. 

13. City of Cleveland 4th of July 

Fireworks in Cleveland Harbor and Lake 

Erie, Cleveland, OH in 33 CFR 

165.939(a)(21) on July 4, 2010 from 10 

p.m. to 10:20 p.m. 

14. Lorain 4th of July Celebration in 

Lorain Harbor, Lorain, OH in 33 CFR 

165.939(a)(25) on July 4, 2010 from 10 

p.m. to 11 p.m. 

These regulations can be found in 73 

Fed. Reg. 28704 (May 19, 2008). 

Under the provisions of 33 CFR 

165.23, entry into, transiting, or 

anchoring within these safety zones is 

prohibited unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port Buffalo or his 

designated representative. Vessels that 

wish to transit through the safety zones 

may request permission from the 

Captain of the Port Buffalo. Requests 

must be made in advance and approved 

by the Captain of Port before transits 

will be authorized. Approvals will be 

granted on a case-by-case basis. The 

Captain of the Port may be contacted via 

U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo on 

channel 16, VHF–FM. The Coast Guard 

will give notice to the public via a 

Broadcast to Mariners that the 

regulation is in effect. 

This notice is issued under authority 

of 33 CFR 165.939 and 5 U.S.C. 552 (a). 

If the District Commander, Captain of 

the Port, or other official authorized to 

do so, determines that the regulated area 

need not be enforced for the full 

duration stated in this notice, he or she 

may use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners 

to grant general permission to enter the 

safety zone. 

Dated: June 28, 2010. 

R.S. Burchell, 

Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Buffalo. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17168 Filed 7–13–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2010–0514; FRL–9172–3] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Sacramento 

Metropolitan Air Quality Management 

District and South Coast Air Quality 

Management District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action to approve revisions to the 

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality 

Management District (SMAQMD) and 

South Coast Air Quality Management 

District (SCAQMD) portions of the 

California State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). These revisions concern volatile 

organic compound (VOC) from 

vanishing oils, rust inhibitors, plastic 

coatings, rubber coatings, glass coatings, 

and aerospace operations. We are 

approving local rules that regulate these 

emission sources under the Clean Air 

Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the 

Act). 

DATES: This rule is effective on 

September 13, 2010 without further 

notice, unless EPA receives adverse 

comments by August 13, 2010. If we 

receive such comments, we will publish 

a timely withdrawal in the Federal 

Register to notify the public that this 

direct final rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number [EPA–R09– 

OAR–2010–0514], by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

online instructions. 

2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at http://www.regulations.gov, 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 40727 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. 

http://www.regulations.gov is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA 

will not know your identity or contact 

information unless you provide it in the 

body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the public 

comment. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: The index to the docket for 

this action is available electronically at 

http://www.regulations.gov and in hard 

copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 

Street, San Francisco, California. While 

all documents in the docket are listed in 

the index, some information may be 

publicly available only at the hard copy 

location (e.g., copyrighted material), and 

some may not be publicly available in 

either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the 

hard copy materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947– 

4126, law.nicole@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What rules did the State submit? 

B. Are there other versions of these rules? 

C. What is the purpose of the submitted 

rules and rule revisions? 

II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action 

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules? 

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation 

criteria? 

C. EPA Recommendations to Further 

Improve the Rules 

D. Public Comment and Final Action 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What rules did the State submit? 

Table 1 lists the rules we are 

approving with the dates that they were 

adopted by the local air agencies and 

submitted by the California Air 

Resources Board (CARB). 

TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES

Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted/ 

amended Submitted 

SCAQMD .......... 1144 Vanishing Oils and Rust Inhibitors ........................................................................... 03/06/09 05/17/10 

SCAQMD .......... 1145 Plastic, Rubber, Leather, and Glass Coatings ......................................................... 12/04/09 05/17/10 

SMAQMD .......... 456 Aerospace Assembly and Component Coating Operations .................................... 10/23/08 09/15/09 

On June 8, 2010, EPA determined that 

the submittal for SCAQMD 1144 and 

SCAQMD 1145 met the completeness 

criteria in 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix V, 

which must be met before formal EPA 

review. 

On January 21, 2010, EPA determined 

that the submittal for SMAQMD 456 met 

the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 

51 Appendix V, which must be met 

before formal EPA review. 

B. Are there other versions of these 

rules? 

There are no previous versions of 

SCAQMD Rule 1144 in the SIP. We 

approved an earlier version of SCAQMD 

Rule 1145 into the SIP on May 4, 1999 

(64 FR 23774). The SCAQMD adopted 

revisions to the SIP-approved version on 

December 3, 2004 and December 4, 2009 

and CARB submitted them to us on 

March 17, 2009 and May 17, 2010. An 

earlier version of SMAQMD Rule 456 

was approved into the SIP on November 

9, 1998 (63 FR 60214) and the 

SMAQMD adopted a revision to that 

version on October 23, 2008. CARB 

submitted it to us on September 15, 

2009. While we can act on only the most 

recently submitted version, we have 

reviewed materials provided with 

previous submittals. 

C. What is the purpose of the submitted 

rules and rule revisions? 

VOCs help produce ground-level 

ozone and smog, which harm human 

health and the environment. Section 

110(a) of the CAA requires States to 

submit regulations that control VOC 

emissions. SCAQMD Rule 1144 will 

regulate vanishing oils and rust 

inhibitors at industrial facilities. 

SCAQMD Rule 1145 lowers VOC 

content limits and begins to regulate the 

leather coatings. SMAQMD Rule 456 

lowers an exemption threshold and the 

VOC content limit for cleaning solvents. 

EPA’s technical support documents 

(TSD) have more information about 

these rules. 

II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action 

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules? 

Generally, SIP rules must be 

enforceable (see section 110(a) of the 

Act), must require Reasonably Available 

Control Technology (RACT) for each 

category of sources covered by a Control 

Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document 

as well as each major source in 

nonattainment areas (see sections 

182(a)(2) and (b)(2)), and must not relax 

existing requirements (see sections 

110(l) and 193). The SCAQMD and 

SMAQMD regulate ozone 

nonattainment areas (see 40 CFR part 

81), so the districts must implement 

RACT for appropriate source categories. 

Guidance and policy documents that 

we use to evaluate enforceability and 

RACT requirements consistently 

include the following: 

1. ‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation 

Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and 

Deviations,’’ EPA, May 25, 1988 (the 

Bluebook). 

2. ‘‘Guidance Document for Correcting 

Common VOC & Other Rule 

Deficiencies,’’ EPA Region 9, August 21, 

2001 (the Little Bluebook). 

3. ‘‘Model Volatile Organic Compound 

Rules for Reasonable Available Control 

Technology,’’ EPA-Staff Working 

Document, June 1992. 

4. ‘‘Control Techniques Guidelines for 

Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts 

Coatings,’’ EPA–453/R–08–003, 

September 2008. 

5. ‘‘Surface Coating Operations at 

Aerospace Manufacturing & Rework 

Operations,’’ EPA–453/R–97–004, 

December 1997. 

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation 

criteria? 

We believe these rules are consistent 

with the relevant policy and guidance 

regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP 

relaxations. SMAQMD Rule 456 has 

RACT deficiencies, but the rule is not 

subject to RACT because the one facility 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
40728 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

in the district under this category emits 

less than 25 tons of VOC per year. The 

TSDs have more information on our 

evaluation. 

C. EPA Recommendations to Further 

Improve the Rules 

The TSDs describe additional rule 

revisions that we recommend for the 

next time the local agencies modify the 

rules. 

D. Public Comment and Final Action 

As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of 

the Act, EPA is fully approving the 

submitted rules because we believe they 

fulfill all relevant requirements. We do 

not think anyone will object to this 

approval, so we are finalizing it without 

proposing it in advance. However, in 

the Proposed Rules section of this 

Federal Register, we are simultaneously 

proposing approval of the same 

submitted rules. If we receive adverse 

comments by August 13, 2010, we will 

publish a timely withdrawal in the 

Federal Register to notify the public 

that the direct final approval will not 

take effect and we will address the 

comments in a subsequent final action 

based on the proposal. If we do not 

receive timely adverse comments, the 

direct final approval will be effective 

without further notice on September 13, 

2010. This will incorporate the rules 

into the federally enforceable SIP. 

Please note that if EPA receives 

adverse comment on an amendment, 

paragraph, or section of this rule and if 

that provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves State law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by State law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by September 13, 

2010. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. Parties with objections to this 

direct final rule are encouraged to file a 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the Proposed Rules 

section of today’s Federal Register, 

rather than file an immediate petition 

for judicial review of this direct final 

rule, so that EPA can withdraw this 

direct final rule and address the 

comment in the proposed rulemaking. 

This action may not be challenged later 

in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: June 18, 2010. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

■ Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.220, is amended by 

adding paragraphs (c)(377) (i)(A)(3) and 

(379) to read as follows: 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(377) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(A) * * * 

(3) Rule 456, ‘‘Aerospace Assembly 

and Component Coating Operations,’’ 

amended on October 23, 2008. 

* * * * * 

(379) New and amended regulations 

for the following APCDs were submitted 

on May 17, 2010 by the Governor’s 

designee. 

(i) Incorporation by Reference. 

(A) South Coast Air Quality 

Management District. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 14, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 40729 

(1) Rule 1144, ‘‘Vanishing Oils and 

Rust Inhibitors,’’ adopted on March 6, 

2009. 

(2) Rule 1145, ‘‘Plastic, Rubber, 

Leather, and Glass Coatings,’’ amended 

on December 4, 2009. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2010–17077 Filed 7–13–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0533; FRL–8833–2] 

Residues of Quaternary Ammonium 

Compounds, N-Alkyl (C12-14) Dimethyl 

Ethylbenzyl Ammonium Chloride; 

Exemption from the Requirement of a 

Tolerance 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation amends an 

existing exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance for residues 

of n-alkyl (C12-14) dimethyl ethylbenzyl 

ammonium chloride on food contact 

surfaces when applied/used in public 

eating places, dairy processing 

equipment, and/or food processing 

equipment and utensils. The regulation 

will exempt from the requirement of 

tolerance residues in food resulting from 

contact with surfaces treated with 

antimicrobial solutions where the enduse concentration of active quaternary 

compound does not exceed 400 parts 

per million (ppm). 

DATES: This regulation is effective July 

14, 2010. Objections and requests for 

hearings must be received on or before 

September 13, 2010, and must be filed 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under docket 

identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2008–0533. All documents in the 

docket are listed in the docket index 

available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available in the electronic docket at 

http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only 

available in hard copy, at the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 

4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 

2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The 

Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. 

to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The Docket 

Facility telephone number is (703) 305– 

5805. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Velma Noble, Antimicrobials Division 

(7510P), Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 308–6233; e-mail address: 

noble.velma@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this Action Apply to Me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are dairy cattle milk 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

beverage manufacturer. Potentially 

affected entities may include, but are 

not limited to: 

• Dairy cattle milk production 

(NAICS code 11212). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Beverage manufacturing (NAICS 

code 3121). 

This listing is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

affected by this action. Other types of 

entities not listed in this unit could also 

be affected. The North American 

Industrial Classification System 

(NAICS) codes have been provided to 

assist you and others in determining 

whether this action might apply to 

certain entities. If you have any 

questions regarding the applicability of 

this action to a particular entity, consult 

the person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

B. How Can I Get Electronic Access to 

Other Related Information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 

through the Government Printing 

Office’s e-CFR site at http:// 

www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr. 

C. How Can I File an Objection or 

Hearing Request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2008–0533 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before September 13, 2010. Addresses 

for mail and hand delivery of objections 

and hearing requests are provided in 40 

CFR 178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing that does not 

contain any CBI for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information not marked 

confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 

may be disclosed publicly by EPA 

without prior notice. Submit a copy of 

your non-CBI objection or hearing 

request, identified by docket ID number 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0533, by one of 

the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs 

(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket (7502P), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket 

Facility ’s normal hours of operation 

(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays). 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Docket Facility telephone number is 

(703) 305–5805. 

II. Summary of Petitioned-For 

Exemption 

In the Federal Register of November 

28, 2007 (72 FR 67299) (FRL–8141–1), 

EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 

408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 

346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a 

pesticide tolerance petition (PP 8F7323) 

by Stepan Company, 22 West Frontage 

Rd., Northfield, IL 60093. The petition 

requested that 40 CFR 180.940(a) be 

amended by increasing concentration 

limits for n-alkyl (C12-14) dimethyl 

ethylbenzyl ammonium chloride in enduse solutions eligible for tolerance 

exemption. That notice referenced a 

summary of the petition prepared by 

Stepan Company, the registrant, which 

is available in the docket, http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1